alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), James B. Boyd, the Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 7th day of November, 2008.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|/S/ JAMES. B BOYD                                         
|James B. Boyd                                             
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Milestone Scientific, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the  date hereof (the Report), I, Rosaline Shau, Acting Chief Financial Officer of  Milestone, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of  Milestone.





A signed original of this  written statement  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





| | /s/ Rosaline    Shau      
| | --------------------------
| |                           
| | Rosaline    Shau          
| | Chief    Financial Officer
| | November 14,    2005      




---
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Oliver Nisenson,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the CSAIL 2015-C4Commercial Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division ofPNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real EstateServices, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,National Association, as Primary Servicer for the Arizona Grand Resort &Spa Mortgage Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for theArizona Grand Resort & Spa Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator for the Arizona GrandResort & Spa Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian for the Arizona Grand Resort & Spa Mortgage Loan, and PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor for the Arizona Grand Resort & SpaMortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 20, 2019

 

 

/s/ Oliver Nisenson

 

 

Director

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
GAYLA R. MAY CSR, RPR

27th Judicial District Court

P. O. Box 747

Belton, TX 76513

(254) 933-5270

 August 17, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Third District of Texas 

Court of Appeals

P. O. Box 12547

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: Trial Court No. 68919; State of Texas Vs. Tremaine Saunders;

 27th District Court, Bell County, TX; Case No. 03-15-00273-CR 

 

Dear Mr. Kyle:

In reference to the above-captioned cause, the filing date for the Reporter's Record was 

last Friday, August 14. I am waiting on one reporter's record -- the jury trial -- and she 

notified me on Friday that she could not have it to me until this date: Monday, August 

17. I replied to her it HAD TO BE today so I am waiting for her email with the PDF 

record. I hope to have the complete record filed this evening.

Thank you for your continued assistance.

Sincerely,

Gayla R. May, CSR, RPR

cc: Mr. Bob Odom

 Mrs. Erika Copeland
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation




 Exhibit 10.3(k) 
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation and Benefits 
 Non-employee directors, including
the director emeritus, of ADTRAN, Inc. (“ADTRAN”) currently receive the following compensation for their Board service. 
  

			
	Annual Retainer:	 	$25,000
	
	Annual Committee Chair Retainer: $5,000
		
	Attendance Fees:	 	$1,500 for Board committee meetings attended in person, $1,000 for each committee meeting attended in person and $500 for each Board or committee meeting attended by
telephone.

 All directors are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses in connection with the performance of
their duties. 
 2005 Directors Stock Option Plan 
 ADTRAN’s non-employee directors, including its current director emeritus, are entitled to participate in our 2005 Directors Stock Option Plan, which our stockholders approved at the 2005 annual meeting of
stockholders on May 18, 2005. The 2005 Directors Plan provides for automatic grants of nonqualified stock options to directors who are not otherwise employees of ADTRAN. Under the terms of the 2005 Directors Plan, an eligible director is
granted a nonqualified stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock upon that director’s initial election to the Board, and receives an additional nonqualified stock option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock as of
December 31 of each subsequent calendar year in which the director is still serving as an eligible director. The options granted under the 2005 Directors Plan have a term of ten years, and the exercise price of the options is the fair market
value of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair market value of our common stock under the 2005 Directors Plan is the closing price of a share of common stock on NASDAQ on the date of grant.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  November 10, 2003                    /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                            Title: President and Treasurer

                                            A signed  original  of this  written
                                            statement  required  by Section  906
                                            has been provided to CNL Income Fund
                                            VIII,  Ltd.  and will be retained by
                                            CNL  Income  Fund  VIII,   Ltd.  and
                                            furnished  to  the   Securities  and
                                            Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff
                                            upon request.
427 A.2d 1215

#### Commonwealth v. Townsend, Appellant.

Submitted December 8, 1978.

Robert G. Allman, for appellant;

Robert B. Lawler, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, SPAETH and WATKINS, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.
### -82 -80 -78 -76

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/27 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 29 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 29

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should submit a 
                National Energy Policy Plan to Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 1995

 Mr. Pickett submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should submit a 
                National Energy Policy Plan to Congress.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the President should, no 
later than January 1, 1996, and biennially thereafter through 2006, 
submit a National Energy Policy Plan to the Congress, together with 
proposals for implementing legislation, that will provide for energy 
self-sufficiency for the United States at the earliest practicable 
date.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1.904(g)-0 Outline of regulation provisions.

This section lists the headings for §§ 1.904(g)-1 through 1.904(g)-3.

## § 1.904(g)-1 Overall domestic loss and the overall domestic loss account.

(a) Overview of regulations.

(b) Overall domestic loss accounts.

(1) In general.

(2) Taxable year in which overall domestic loss is sustained.

(c) Determination of a taxpayer's overall domestic loss.

(1) Overall domestic loss defined.

(2) Domestic loss defined.

(3) Qualified taxable year defined.

(4) Method of allocation and apportionment of deductions.

(d) Additions to overall domestic loss accounts.

(1) General rule.

(2) Overall domestic loss of another taxpayer.

(3) Adjustments for capital gains and losses.

(e) Reductions of overall domestic loss accounts.

(1) Pre-recapture reduction for amounts allocated to other taxpayers.

(2) Reduction for amounts recaptured.

(f) Effective/applicability date.

## § 1.904(g)-2 Recapture of overall domestic losses.

(a) In general.

(b) Determination of U.S. source taxable income for purposes of recapture.

(c) Section 904(g)(1) recapture.

(d) Effective/applicability date.

## § 1.904(g)-3 Ordering rules for the allocation of net operating losses, net capital losses, U.S. source losses, and separate limitation losses, and for the recapture of separate limitation losses, overall foreign losses, and overall domestic losses.

(a) In general.

(b) Step One: Allocation of net operating loss and net capital loss carryovers.

(1) In general.

(2) Full net operating loss carryover.

(3) Partial net operating loss carryover.

(4) Net capital loss carryovers.

(c) Step Two: Section 904(b) adjustments.

(d) Step Three: Allocation of separate limitation losses.

(e) Step Four: Allocation of U.S. source losses.

(f) Step Five: Recapture of overall foreign loss accounts.

(g) Step Six: Recapture of separate limitation loss accounts.

(h) Step Seven: Recapture of overall domestic loss accounts.

(i) Step Eight: Dispositions under section 904(f)(3) in which gain would not otherwise be recognized.

(j) [Reserved]

(k) Examples.

(l) Applicability date.

[T.D. 9371, 72 FR 72599, Dec. 21, 2007, as amended by T.D. 9595, 77 FR 37580, June 22, 2012; T.D 9882, 84 FR 69102, Dec. 17, 2019; T.D. 9882, 85 FR 29323, May 15, 2020]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH JEROME PACKNETT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

FERNAND ALVAREZ; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-17198 

D.C. No. 4:15-cv-01229-YGR 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 12, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Kenneth Jerome Packnett appeals pro se from the 

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal 

and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for 

an abuse of discretion the denial of an extension of time to file an opposition. See 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-17198 

Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1258 (9th Cir. 2010). We 

affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Packnett’s seventh

motion to extend the time to file an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary 

judgment because Packnett was warned that he would not be given any further 

extensions, had over ten months to file an opposition, and had extensive access to 

the prison law library during that period. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) (“When an act 

may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend 

the time . . . .”); Ahanchian, 624 F.3d at 1258-60 (discussing good cause 

requirement for extensions of time).

In his opening brief, Packnett fails to address the district court’s grant of

summary judgment for defendants. Therefore, Packnett has waived any challenge 

to the summary judgment. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 

1999) (arguments not raised by party in opening brief are deemed waived).

AFFIRMED.
Order entered April 28, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00473-CV

IN RE LEXON INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-06030

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We DENY relator’s emergency motion to stay proceedings in the trial court pending 

determination of the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We ORDER that relator bear the 

costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ JIM MOSELEY 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Bacillus Anthracis Program Project.                    

*Date:*                         February 19, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         12 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, Room 3122, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brenda Lange-Gustafson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Scientific Review Program, Room 3122, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-3684,                         *bgustafson@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 22, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-1856 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 22-BG-729

IN RE DAVID G. HOFFMAN,

DDN: 2021-D231

An Inactive Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 341560

BEFORE: McLeese and Howard, Associate Judges, and Ferren, Senior Judge.

O R D E R

(FILED—December 1, 2022)

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Virginia revoking 

respondent’s license to practice law; this court’s September 30, 2022, order 

suspending respondent pending final disposition of this proceeding and directing 

him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the 

statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent has not filed a 

response or his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit with this court, it is

ORDERED that David G. Hoffman is hereby disbarred from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) 

(explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of imposition of identical 

discipline and exceptions to this presumption should be rare); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 

194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (explaining that a rebuttable presumption of identical 

reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not 

participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s 

disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully 

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

PER CURIAM