alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RTR NESHAP for Pulp and Paper 

(Subpart S) Promulgation Package

OMB Briefing

July 10, 2012
Overview

 Sector Background

 Proposal Summary

 Package Changes Since Proposal

 Impacts of Regulation

2

 Schedule
Sector Background

 About 350 pulp & paper mills

 175 major sources subject to MACT, 

typically integrated pulp & paper

 175 area sources, paper only

 $115 billion in sales; 400K direct jobs

 79 million tons of paper produced in 2008, 

Pollutant

Sector 

Emissions 

(TPY)

(includes boilers)

HAP 63,400

VOCs 65,000

 79 million tons of paper produced in 2008, 

18% decrease from 1999 peak

 China eclipsed U.S. as largest paper 

producer; U.S. largest in pulp production

 Emissions summary for Subpart S:

 Pre-MACT: 230,000 tons/year

 Post-MACT: 45,160 tons/year

NOx 153,000

PM2.5 27,000

SO2 211,000

CO 161,000

3
Proposal Summary

 Risk Assessment (actuals)

 Risk acceptable with ample margin of safety, no new controls

 10 in 1 million cancer risk; 0.4 maximum chronic non-cancer Target 

Organ-Specific Hazard Index (TOSHI); Hazard Quotient Reference 

Exposure Level or HQREL of 20 (acetaldehyde) at limited public access 

location

 Technology Review

 Kraft condensates: increase HAP control requirement from 92% to 94%

 Require use of Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT); test every permitting 

cycle

 Other Actions

 SSM: removed references so standard applies at all times

 Excess emission allowances: requested comment (retain or remove)

 Cost Impacts

 Total cost: $42.1M

 Annual cost: $6.2M/year

 HAP reduction: 4090 tons/year

4
Impacts of Regulation

 Kraft and bleaching vents:

 No impact

 Kraft condensates:

 No impact

 Additional monitoring:

 Estimated annual costs: $2.1 M/year

5
Schedule

 Proposal Signature (court-ordered) December 

15, 2011

 OMB Package June 28, 2012

 Final Signature (court-ordered) July 31, 2012

6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from Magellan
Technology,  Inc.  Form 10-QSB and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  24,118
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          983,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                            829,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2,005,085
<PP&E>                                               1,163,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                         286,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,383,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6,462,310
<BONDS>                                                501,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 4,880
<OTHER-SE>                                          (2,584,962)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,383,401
<SALES>                                              3,215,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,215,954
<CGS>                                                1,278,115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,801,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       290,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     295,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,448,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,448,939)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (.08)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Mitchell Sepaniak, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of Weida Communications, Inc.

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the condensedconsolidated financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report.

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and we have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: June 13, 2005 |                                                         |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | /s/ Mitchell Sepaniak                                        |   |
|                     | **Mitchell Sepaniak  President and Chief Executive Officer** |

 

----
# Europos Sąjungos C 301A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-521X |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 301A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 49 tomas2006m. gruodžio 12d. |

ISSN 1725-521X

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 301A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

49 tomas2006m. gruodžio 12d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Pranešimai |
| | Komisija |
| 2006/C 301A/1 | Bendrijos augalų veislių tarnyba – Kvietimas dalyvauti konkurse Apeliacinės tarybos pirmininko ir pakaitinio pirmininko pareigoms eiti | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

III   Pranešimai

Komisija

2006/C 301A/1

Bendrijos augalų veislių tarnyba – Kvietimas dalyvauti konkurse Apeliacinės tarybos pirmininko ir pakaitinio pirmininko pareigoms eiti

1

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

III Pranešimai

Komisija

| 12.12.2006 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 301/1

---

BENDRIJOS AUGALŲ VEISLIŲ TARNYBA

Kvietimas dalyvauti konkurse Apeliacinės tarybos pirmininko ir pakaitinio pirmininko pareigoms eiti

(2006/C 301 A/01)

Bendrijos augalų veislių tarnyba ketina paskirti Apeliacinės tarybos pirmininką ir pakaitinį pirmininką.

Kandidatai privalo būti vienos iš Europos Sąjungos valstybių narių piliečiai.

Pirmininką ir pakaitinį pirmininką skiria Taryba iš kandidatų sąrašo, kurį siūlo Komisija, gavusi Tarnybos Administracinės tarybos nuomonę. Paprašius, informacijos apie atlyginimą gali suteikti Apeliacinės tarybos sekretoriatas (Bendrijos augalų veislių tarnyba, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). Bendrijos augalų veislių tarnyba ir Komisija vykdo lygių galimybių politiką.

Pareigybės aprašymą, paraiškos formas ir paraiškos pateikimo taisykles galite parsisiųsti iš interneto šiuo adresu:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

arba

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Galutinė paraiškų priėmimo data – 2007 m. sausio 31 d. (žr. paraiškos pateikimo taisykles).

---
State 2012-2013 

Proposed Budget 

(Tons) 

2012-2013 Final 

Budget (Tons)

Difference 

(Tons)

Percentage 

Difference

Iowa 16,532 16,532 0 0%

Kansas 13,536 N/A -- --

Michigan 25,752 28,041 2,289 9%

Missouri 22,762 22,762 0 0%

Oklahoma 21,835 36,567 21,835 14,732 0 67% 0%

Wisconsin 13,704 14,784 1,080 8%

State 2014 Proposed 

Budget (Tons) 

2014 Final Budget 

(Tons)

Difference 

(Tons)

Percentage 

Difference

Iowa 16,207 16,207 0 0%

Kansas 10,998 N/A -- --

Michigan 24,727 27,016 2,289 9%

Missouri 21,073 21,073 0 0%

Oklahoma 21,835 21,835 0 0%

Wisconsin 13,216 14,296 1,080 8%

2012 Total 

Budget (Tons)

Increase

Final CSAPR Ozone Season NOx Budget w/o Supplemental States 495,314 - -

Final CSAPR and Proposed Supplemental Ozone Season NOx 

Budget *

595,899 100,585

Final CSAPR and Final Supplemental Ozone Season NOx Budget ** 614,000 118,686

* Does not include proposed budget for Kansas

** Includes 2012 budget for Oklahoma (total would be 599,268 tons in 2013)

2014 Total 

Budget (Tons)

Increase

Final CSAPR Ozone Season NOx Budget w/o Supplemental States 466,298 - -

Final CSAPR and Proposed Supplemental Ozone Season NOx 

Budget *

563,356 97,058

Final CSAPR and Final Supplemental Ozone Season NOx Budget 566,725 100,427

* Does not include proposed budget for Kansas
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Wednesday, August 19, 2009.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Enforcement Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-18342 Filed 7-28-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 153

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 153

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 153 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

2 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

3 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa4 tion (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘As5 sociation’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event,

6 soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds on July 13,

7 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House

8 of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

9 Senate may jointly designate.

10 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

11 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

12 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

13 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi14 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

15 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

17 incident to all activities associated with the event.

18 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

19 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

20 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject

21 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

22 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

23 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car24 ried out under this resolution.
3

•HCON 153 EH

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

3 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar4 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

5 under this resolution.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 109 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 109

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 27 (legislative day, October 26), 1995

                                Received

                            October 31, 1995

                  Referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the need for raising the 
                    social security earnings limit.

Whereas the Senate has held hearing on the social security earnings limit in 
        1994 and 1995 and the House has held two hearings on the social security 
        earnings limit in 1995;
Whereas the Senate has overwhelmingly passed Sense of the Senate language 
        calling for substantial reform of the social security earnings limit;
Whereas the House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed legislation to 
        raise the exempt amount under the social security earnings limit three 
        times, in 1989, 1992, and 1995;
Whereas such legislation is a key provision of the Contract with America;
Whereas the President in his 1992 campaign document ``Putting People First'' 
        pledged to lift the social security earnings limit; and
Whereas the social security earnings limit is a depression-era relic that 
        unfairly punishes working seniors: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the intent of the Congress that legislation will be passed 
before the end of 1995 to raise the social security earnings limit for 
working seniors aged 65 through 69 in a manner which will ensure the 
financial integrity of the social security trust funds and will be 
consistent with the goal of achieving a balanced budget in 7 years.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 26, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 34.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Management Committee

BMW Financial Services NA, LLC



We have examined BMW Financial Services NA, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for Asset-Backed Securities, BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2015-2 (except for the servicing criteria described in the following paragraph), which the Company has determined as being applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from October 14, 2015 to December 31, 2015. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria based on our examination.



The Company has determined that the servicing criteria in Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x)(A)-(C), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv)  are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from October 14, 2015 to December 31, 2015.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph of this report and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified in the first paragraph.



In our opinion, BMW Financial Services NA, LLC complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from October 14, 2015 to December 31, 2015.



/s/ CohnReznick LLP



Roseland, New Jersey

March 22, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 146 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.146
                                                Agreed to March 27, 1996

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                          Concurrent Resolution

 
Authorizing the 1996 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
              THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 24, 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
jointly designate, the 1996 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: July 7, 2016 D-42-16

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a.
COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STANDARDS, ON MOTION Petitioner; HASAN TUVAN YALIM, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4347399)
Calendar Date: February 22, 2016 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner. Hasan Tuvan Yalim, Istanbul, Turkey, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2005, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]). Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object-2- D-42-16

to respondent's application. Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately. Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court