alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w6



 








Exhibit 10.6




WINDSTREAM CORPORATION

Director Compensation Program

Approved June 1, 2006

and Amended August 3, 2006,

November 7, 2006, and February 7, 2007



Compensation for directors who are not officers of the Corporation will consist of the following
components:





	 	1.	 	Initial Retainer. Each new member will receive a
grant of $60,000 in restricted stock under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan in connection
with his or her appointment or election to the Board.
	 
	 	2.	 	Annual Retainer. Each member will receive an
annual cash retainer of $60,000. Commencing January 1, 2007, the Chairman will receive a
supplemental annual cash retainer of $25,000.
	 
	 	3.	 	Meeting Fees. Each member will receive a cash fee of $1,750 for each Board and
Committee meeting attended.
	 
	 	4.	 	Committee Chair Fees. Each member who serves as Chair of a Board Committee will
receive the following indicated annual cash fee:





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	•      Audit
	 	 	—	 	 	$	12,500	 
	•      Compensation
	 	 	—	 	 	$	12,500	 
	•      Governance
	 	 	—	 	 	$	12,500	 







5. Annual Restricted Stock. Each member will receive
an annual grant of $60,000 in restricted stock under
the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.


All other terms and conditions of the grants of restricted stock
shall be determined and approved by the Compensation Committee.



Members will receive a prorated amount of the Annual Retainer, Committee Chair Fees and Annual
Restricted Stock Grant for the portion of the first year for which they are appointed or elected to
serve as a Board member or Committee Chair. For future years, directors will receive the Annual
Retainer, Committee
Chair Fees and Restricted Stock grants at the first regularly scheduled board meeting of the year.
exv10w1



 




EXHIBIT 10.1



Independent Auditors’ Consent



The Supervisory Board




SAP Aktiengesellschaft Systeme, Anwendungen,
Produkte in der Datenverarbeitung:




     
We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the registration statement (Nos. 333-60399, 333-65083,
333-30380, 333-41762, 333-63496, 333-63464 and 333-102564) on
Form S-8 of SAP Aktiengesellschaft Systeme, Anwendungen,
Produkte in der Datenverarbeitung and subsidiaries (“SAP
AG”) of our report dated February 21, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheet of SAP AG as of
December 31, 2002 and the related consolidated statements
of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 2002, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the
December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 20-F, as
amended, of SAP AG.



     
Our report refers to our audit of the disclosures
added to revise the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial
statements, as more fully described in Note 14 to the
consolidated financial statements and to our audit of the
adjustments that were applied to the 2001 and 2000 consolidated
financial statements, as more fully described in Note 21 to
the consolidated financial statements. However, we were not
engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001
and 2000 consolidated financial statements other than with
respect to such disclosures and adjustments.




/s/ KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft




Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft





Mannheim, Germany





April 14, 2003
Docket No: FAA - 2016 - 5040 Dir ID: 2013 - NM - 192 - AD
Exhibit 10.39


    Exhibit
      10.39

    Summary
      of Compensation for Non-Employee Directors

    Effective
      January 1, 2007

    


    
      	
              Annual
                Board Retainer

            	
              $
                40,000 

            
	
              Board
                Meeting Fee

            	
              $
                1,500 per meeting attended 

            
	
              Committee
                Chair Annual Retainer

            	 
	
              Audit/Compensation

            	
              $
                15,000

            
	
              Committee
                Chair Annual Retainer

            	 
	
              Other
                Committees

            	
              $
                5,000

            
	
              Committee
                Meeting Fee

            	
              $
                1,500 per meeting attended 

            
	
              Annual
                Equity Grant (1)

            	
              $
                125,000
EX-10.53



 





Exhibit 10.53




Amendment Number One to

The MetLife Non-Management Director Deferred Compensation Plan

(as amended and restated as of December, 2006) (the “Plan”)




     The Plan is hereby amended in the manner set forth below:



     1. The second paragraph of the section entitled “Investment Tracking for Your Deferred Cash
Accounts” is amended and restated to read as follows:




The Plan Administrator may eliminate or replace any investment tracking fund or index at any
time. When the Plan Administrator has determined to make a change, you will be informed and
you will be given an opportunity to change your investment tracking selections to the extent
they are affected by the change. Changes to investment tracking fund or index may be made
without amending the Plan document, but will be reflected in the next amended and restated
Plan document.



     2. This Amendment will be effective immediately upon execution.



     3. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the Plan (including any amendments thereto)
shall continue in full force and effect without amendment.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is approved.




PLAN ADMINISTRATOR





			
	 
	/s/ Andrew J. Bernstein for Margery Brittain	 
	 
	 
	 
	Date:  2-26-07	 
	 
	 
	 
	Witness: /s/ Joo Young Kang
Order filed February 25, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-14-00127-CV

____________

IN RE ROBERT M. SPRAGUE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-48988

ABATEMENT ORDER

On February 11, 2014, relator, Robert M. Sprague, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221. In the petition, 

relator complained of a number of pretrial evidentiary rulings issued by The 

Honorable Judy Warne, Judge of the 257th District Court, Harris County, Texas, in 

trial court cause number 2005-48999, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of R.M. 
2

Sprague and D.L. Sprague. 

This court requested a response to the petition from real party in interest to be 

filed on or before February 18, 2014. On February 18, 2014, the parties in the 

underlying case filed a joint motion to suspend this court’s deadline for filing a 

response to the petition because they are attempting to settle the case. The joint 

motion to suspend is GRANTED. The relator and the real party in interest did not 

suggest a new deadline for filing the response in the event a settlement is not 

reached. Accordingly, we issue the following order. 

The original proceeding is abated for a period of thirty days from the date of 

this order, at which time the relator and the real party in interest are directed to 

advise the court of the status of the settlement. The original proceeding is treated as 

a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The original 

proceeding will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the parties file a 

motion to dismiss the original proceeding or other dispositive motion. This court 

also will consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the original proceeding, or the 

court may reinstate the original proceeding on its own motion.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Wise.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

DocumentNumber: 

3^93$) ll-E-195 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM Sheet 235 of 264 
P.2 

OCT.27.1998 1 3:04PM ©]5EQUENTI_R-GRAND JCT, TNgj RT p NC NO.47b

 Vm<L/% 002/002 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Contact Report 

Kenneth R. Meardon, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

October 27.1998 

Mr. Carl Novak 

Company: Kemlite-Sequetrtia 

Telephone Number: (901)764-2153 

Fax Number: (901)764^6397 

Contact Summary: 

I contacted Mr. Novak to confirm the accuracy ofthe folio-wing cost information for the 

four enclosures built at the Grand Junction facility that was summarized in tiie trip repon 

documenting the July 11,1996 site visit and whether the information is considered to be 

confidential: 

"11. Mr. Novak provided the following estimated costs for installing the four enclosures: 

first line (narrow corrugated): S 8,300 

second line (narrow corrugate): $12,000 

third line (narrow flat): 514,000 

fourth line (wide flat): $23,000 

These costs include design, fkbrication, and installation. He noted that there js some 

effort required to train the employees to use tiie enclosures properly (e.g., do not slam 

windows shut, keep windows shut except when accessing the line). He felt that 

maintenance costs were small, although Mr. Smith noted that there is a constant clean-up 

effort to keep the enclosures clean." 

Mr. Novak indicated that the information is accurate and is not confidential. He also 

noted that tiie costs were incuned prior to our site visit in 1996. He also indicated that they had a 

contractor come in to measure all ofthe li^es-qnd build-th^ enclosures. Finally, Mr. Novak stated 

that the above costs were final projeetj 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE 

RECEIVED TIME OCT, 27. l'STR-l PRINT TIME r>TT.5>-? 1ICODM
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 200

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Secretary of

the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 19 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of

a Secretary of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives be noti2 fied of the election of the Honorable Martha S. Pope as

3 Secretary of the Senate.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margarito RODRIGUEZ-LEON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-50016.

D.C. No. CR-00-02420-1-IEG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 14, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Margarito Rodriguez-Leon appeals the 6-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

Rodriguez-Leon contends that 21 U.S.C. § 960, the statute under which he was convicted, is unconstitutional after *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He further contends that his due process rights were violated because the government did not prove that he knowingly imported 28.8 kilograms of marijuana.

These contentions are foreclosed by our recent decisions in *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104, 1109-10 (9th Cir.2002) (concluding that § 960 is not facially unconstitutional), and *United States v. Carranza,*289 F.3d 634, 643-44 (9th Cir.2002) (rejecting appellant’s argument that the government was required to prove that he knew the type and amount of the imported controlled substance).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 99.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Sr. Vice President of C&M Management Inc. and Director of Accounting of Boston Capital Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  | American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                  |                                                   
|                  | By:                                               
|                  |                                                   
|                  |                                                   
|                  | By:                                               
|                  |                                                   
|                  |                                                   
|                  | By:                                               
|                  |                                                   
|                  |                                                   
|Date:             |                                                   
|November 20, 2002 | By:                                               
|                  |                                                   
|                  |                                                   
|                  |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 153 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.153
                                                 Agreed to June 21, 1996

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                          Concurrent Resolution

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                             Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds 
on July 13, 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly 
designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8016 

To exclude the Arizona Families Tax Rebate from Federal income tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2024 

Mr. STANTON (for himself and Mr. SCHWEIKERT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To exclude the Arizona Families Tax Rebate from Federal 

income tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR ARI4 ZONA FAMILIES TAX REBATE PAYMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986, gross income shall not include any 

7 amount received by an individual as an Arizona Families 

8 Tax Rebate payment. 

9 (b) ARIZONA FAMILIES TAX REBATE PAYMENT.— 

10 For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘Arizona Families 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8016 IH

1 Tax Rebate Payment’’ means any amount received by or 

2 on behalf of an individual— 

3 (1) pursuant to Arizona Senate Bill 1734, and 

4 (2) which is issued by the Arizona Department 

5 of Revenue with respect to the 2023 taxable year. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 1.461-6 Economic performance when certain liabilities are assigned or are extinguished by the establishment of a fund. ( a ) *Qualified assignments of certain personal injury liabilities under section 130.* In the case of a qualified assignment (within the meaning of section 130(c)), economic performance occurs as a taxpayer-assignor makes payments that are excludible from the income of the assignee under section 130(a).
( b ) *Section 468B.* Economic performance occurs as a taxpayer makes qualified payments to a designated settlement fund under section 468B, relating to special rules for designated settlement funds.
( c ) *Payments to other funds or persons that constitute economic performance.* [Reserved]
( d ) *Effective dates.* The rules in paragraph (a) of this section apply to payments after July 18, 1984.
[T.D. 8408, 57 FR 12428, Apr. 10, 1992]
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00453

- CV In the Interest of R.C.H. , a Child From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017PA02163 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Karen Ang elini, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 10, 2018
AFFIRMED , MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED Appellant H.H. appeals the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to his child, R.C.H. Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief containing a
pro fessional evaluation of the record and concludin g there are no arguable grounds for reversal of the termination order

. The brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (recognizing that Anders procedures apply in parental termination cases). Additionally, c ounsel represents that he provided appellant with a copy of the brief and the motion , advised appellant of his right to review the record and file his own brief , and i nformed appellant how to obtain a copy of the record

. We issued an order

se tting deadline s for appellant to request the record and file a pro se brief. The clerk of this court

ma iled copies of the order to appellant’s last known address on two occasions, but the orders were04

- 18

- 00453

- CV

- 2

- returned with the designation “not deliverable as addressed.” Appellant did not request the record

or file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel ’ s brief, we co nclude no plausible grounds exist for reversal of the termination order

. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’ s termination order. However, because counsel does not assert any ground for withdrawal other than his conclusion that the appeal is frivolous, we deny counsel’ s motion to withdraw

. See id. at 2 7

– 28 (holding that counsel’ s obligations in parental termination cases extend through the exhaustion or waiver of all appeals, including the filing of a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Co urt).
Karen Angelini, Justice
#### § 1.563-1 Accumulated earnings tax.

In the determination of the dividends paid deduction for purposes of the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531, a dividend paid after the close of any taxable year and on or before the 15th day of the third month following the close of such taxable year shall be considered as paid during such taxable year, and shall not be included in the computation of the dividends paid deduction for the year of payment. However, the rule provided in section 563(a) is not applicable to dividends paid during the first two and one-half months of the first taxable year of the corporation subject to tax under chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

          - [C-570-946]

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 23, 2009

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Copyak, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 4014, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2209.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 23, 2009, the Department published its notice of initiation of the countervailing duty investigation of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from the People's Republic of China (“PRC”). See Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From the People's Republic of China:                           ( print page 38585)                        Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 74 FR 29670 (June 23, 2009). In that notice, the effective date was listed as June 16, 2009. The effective date should have read June 23, 2009, which was the date of publication of the notice of initiation.                

Dated: July 21, 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary  for Import Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-18594 Filed 8-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S