alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Neenah Foundry Companypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer,and Corporate Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Neenah Foundry Company (the“Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.DATE: February 14, 2008         /s/ Robert E. Ostendorf, Jr.   Robert E. Ostendorf, Jr.   President and Chief Executive Officer       /s/ Gary W. LaChey   Gary W. LaChey   Corporate Vice President — Financeand Chief Financial Officer   
37
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 91

To refer S. 745 entitled ‘‘A Bill for the Relief of Hardwick, Inc.,’’ to

the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 2 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Mr. SIMON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 745 entitled ‘‘A Bill for the Relief of Hardwick,

Inc.,’’ to the Chief Judge of the United States Court

of Federal Claims.

1 Resolved, That the bill S. 745 entitled ‘‘A Bill for the

2 Relief of Hardwick, Inc.’’ now pending in the Senate, to3 gether with all accompanying papers, is referred to the

4 Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

5 The Chief Judge shall proceed with consideration of such

6 case in accordance with the provisions of sections 1492

7 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code (notwithstanding

8 any other appeal, statute, case law, or regulations, includ9 ing section 1500 of title 28, United States Code, that may

10 limit in any way the jurisdiction or authority of the court),
2

•SRES 91 IS

1 and report thereon to the Senate at the earliest practicable

2 date giving findings of fact and conclusions thereon as

3 shall be sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature

4 and character of the demand as a claim, legal or equitable

5 against the United States, and the amount, if any, legally

6 or equitably due to the claimants from the United States.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy Terrell WASHINGTON, a/k/a Antonio Williams, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6380.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Troy Terrell Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Welsh, Assistant United States Attorney, Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Assistant United States Attorney, Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Lynne Ann Battaglia, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Troy Terrell Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Washington,*Nos. CR-96-175; CA-99-2726 (D.Md. Nov. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### § 1.826-4 Allocation of expenses.

An attorney-in-fact allocating expenses as required by section 826(b) and paragraph (b) of § 1.826-3 shall allocate each expense itemized in its income tax return (and accompanying schedules) for the taxable year to each source of gross income (as set forth pursuant to paragraph (b)(2) of § 1.826-3). However, no portion of the net operating loss deduction allowed by section 172 shall be allocated to income received or due from the reciprocal, and no expenses, other than those directly related thereto, shall be allocated to capital gains. Where the method of allocation used by the taxpayer does not reasonably reflect the expenses of the taxpayer allocable to income received or due from the reciprocal, the district director may require the taxpayer to use such other method of allocation as is reasonable under the circumstances.

[T.D. 6681, 28 FR 11126, Oct. 17, 1963]
r7n^-,^:•; .^K

Unitcd 5^tjtcs .^c^^^tc	

,U+'v([Cvua"s:,

vVASI-ilNC.3 rUN, DC 20-510 

October 29, 2013 

The Honorable Gina McCarthy 

Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania nvenue, NW 

Washington, District of Colurnbia 20460 

llear Administrator McCarthy, 

Section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act requires the Environmental Protection Agency to announce 

each November the amount of biofuel, most notably corn ethanol, that our nation will be forced 

to consume in the following year. Current law also allows the EPA to protect Americans by 

ensuring that biofuel mandates are not excessive and do not threaten economic growth. 

I sincerely hope the EPA will not miss this deadline again. Last year's delay not only violated 

federal law, but also increased Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credit prices, whieh 

threatened the viability of numerous oil refineries, including several in Southeastern 

Pennsylvania. 

F'urther, with regard to deciding total biofuel mandates, I hope you will consider the serious harm 

that burning food crops for fuel causes our nation. In 2012, the United States used more corn to 

produce ethanol than it did to produce food products. This unwise use of our nation's agricultural 

resources increases food prices for millions of American families who are already struggling to 

make ends meet. 

I urge you to release a final biofuel mandate for 2014 that lowers harmful consumption 

requirements by the November 31 st deadline. Thank you for your prornpt attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Iat Toomey 

iJnited States Senator
427 A.2d 1217

#### Rigby, Appellant v. Rigby.

Submitted April 11, 1979.

Henry A. Hudson, Jr., for appellant;

Leonard R. Reeves, for appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Order affirmed.
+Corrected 1/5/17

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAROLYN S. HUNT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-15931

D.C. No. 1:13-cv-01999-SKO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Sheila K. Oberto, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 30, 2016** 

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges+

Carolyn Hunt appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for supplemental

security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction

FILED

JAN 04 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, and will reverse only if the

administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision is not supported by substantial

evidence in the record or is based on legal error. Rounds v. Comm’r Soc. Sec.

Admin., 807 F.3d 996, 1002 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

Hunt contends that at step five of the sequential analysis, the ALJ erred by

finding that Hunt had a high school education. However, the ALJ’s finding was

supported by substantial evidence, including her testimony that she had earned a

high school diploma. See 20 C.F.R. § 416.964(a) (formal schooling is the primary

factor in an ALJ’s finding regarding a claimant’s level of education). Hunt’s

evidence that she suffered a deficiency in attention and concentration does not

establish a lack of “ability in reasoning, arithmetic, and language skills.” 20 C.F.R.

§ 416.964(b) (describing how an ALJ evaluates a claimant’s educational level). 

The ALJ properly considered Hunt’s “fair” ability to attend and concentrate in

connection with her residual functional capacity, rather than her education level. 

See 20 C.F.R. § 416.960(c) (at step five, an ALJ must consider both (1) residual

functional capacity and (2) vocational factors of age, education, and work

experience); see 20 C.F.R. § 416.945 (defining residual functional capacity).

The ALJ therefore did not err in concluding that under the MedicalVocational Guidelines, Hunt’s exertional limitations, considered without regard to

2
her non-exertional impairments, did not by themselves warrant a finding of

disability. See 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subpart P, App. 2, § 203.06 (person who has at

least a high school education, is limited to medium work, is closely approaching

retirement age, and has no previous work experience or unskilled work experience

is considered not disabled); cf. id. § 203.02 (similar person with limited or less

education must be found disabled). The Commissioner also met her burden of

showing that Hunt was capable of making a successful adjustment to jobs that

existed in significant numbers in the national economy. See Rounds, 807 F.3d at

1002.

AFFIRMED.

3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Initial Review Group; Genome Research Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         March 5, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NHGRI Twinbrook Library, 5635 Fishers Lane Room 4076, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Keith McKenney, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, NHGRI, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-594-4280,                         *mckenneyk@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 22, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-1853 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 15, 2020

No. 04

- 18

- 00498

- CV

MWM HELOTES RANCH, LTD. and Myfe Moore

,

Appellants

v.

John H. WHITE Jr., Individually; John H. White III, Individually; John H. White Jr., John H.

White III, and Molly C. White, in their capacities as Co

- Trustees of the 1983 John H. W hite

Long

- Term Trust F/B/O John H. White Jr., and of the 1976B Partnership Trust; TCW Helotes

Ranch Ltd; and Tuleta White,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI11563

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge P residing



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sand ee Bryan Marion, C hief Justic e

Rebeca C . Martinez, J ustice

Liza A. Ro d riguez, Justice

The Appellants ’ ( Ric k Harri son , K ev in B rown and Waller , Lansden , Dor tch & Davis

LLP ) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney s of Record is hereby GRAN TED.

_ ________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the s eal of the said

court on this 15th day of April, 2020

._ __________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for
        the
        period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger D. Dudley, Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 **/s/
                  ROGER D. DUDLEY**Roger
                  D. DudleyChief
                  Financial Officer
 Dated
        January 8, 2007
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTrace Contaminant Control for the International Space Station's Node 1- Analysis, Design, and VerificationTrace chemical contaminant generation inside crewed spacecraft cabins is a technical and medical problem that must be continuously evaluated. Although passive control through materials selection and active control by adsorption and catalytic oxidation devices is employed during normal operations of a spacecraft, contaminant buildup can still become a problem. Buildup is particularly troublesome during the stages between the final closure of a spacecraft during ground processing and the time that a crewmember enters for the first time during the mission. Typically, the elapsed time between preflight closure and first entry on orbit for spacecraft such as Spacelab modules was 30 days. During that time, the active contamination control systems are not activated and contaminants can potentially build up to levels which exceed the spacecraft maximum allowable concentrations (SMACs) specified by NASA toxicology experts. To prevent excessively high contamination levels at crew entry, the Spacelab active contamination control system was operated for 53 hours just before launch.Document ID20170005170Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsPerry, J. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 5, 2017Publication DateApril 1, 2017Subject CategorySpace Transportation And SafetyNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2017-218235Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005170.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

      This Report on Form 10-Q of Tri-County Financial Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 Date: November 10, 2005           By: /s/ Michael L. Middleton
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Michael L. Middleton
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

 Date: November 10, 2005           By: /s/ William J. Pasenelli
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       William J. Pasenelli
                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer
From: Szabo, Aaron To: Fisher, Brian ; Risley, David Subject: Summary of Additional Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS (RIN 2060-AS05) Date: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 2:39:59 PM Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO12866_13563 EPA CSAPR Update NPR....docx
Attached please find the summary additional of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 on the draft proposed rule and regulatory impact analysis for the draft proposed rule entitled, Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS

. Thank you and please let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Aaron L. Szabo Policy Analyst Office of Management and Budget 202-395-3621 Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
#### § 1.822-11 Net premiums.

The term “net premiums”, defined in section 822(f)(1), includes deposits and assessments, but excludes amounts returned to policyholders which are treated as dividends under section 822(f)(2). Net premiums are used in sections 822(c)(6) and 832(c)(5) in determining the limitation on certain capital losses and in the application of section 1212.

[T.D. 6681, 28 FR 11115, Oct. 17, 1963]
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20619 Summary Calendar
GERALD ALLEN PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. JOHN B. HOLMES, Former District Attorney of Harri s C ounty; STEVE BALDASSANO, Former Assistant District Attorney of Harris County; BOYOL SMITH, Sergeant; K.R. WILLIAMSON, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CV-3865
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gerald Allen Perry, Texas prisoner # 644896, has b e e n b arred from proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) be c a u s e , on at least three prior occasions whil e i n c ar c e rated, he has brought an action or ap p e al i n a court of the United States that was dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. See Perry v. Johnson, U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 15, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20619 Document: 00511571805 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2011No. 10-20619

No. 5:01-CV-00165 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2003) (unpublished); Perry v. Holmes , No. 05-2013 7 ( 5 th Cir. Nov. 1, 2005) (unpublished). Furthermore, Perry has not alleged that he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” § 1915(g). Thus, the district court improvidently granted Perry leave to proceed IFP on appeal. Accordingly, Perry’s IFP status is decertified, and the appeal is dismissed. Perry has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee to the clerk of the district court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal. Perry’s request for the production of transcripts at government expense is denied.

I F P D E CERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MO T I O N F O R TRANSCRIPTS AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE DENIED.

2 Case: 10-20619 Document: 00511571805 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2011
§ 1.528-2 Organized and operated to provide for the acquisition, construction, management, maintenance and care of association property. ( a ) *Organized and operated* — ( 1 ) *Organized.* To be treated as a homeowners association an organization must be organized and operated primarily for the purpose of carrying on one or more of the exempt functions of a homeowners association. For the purposes of section 528 and these regulations, the exempt functions of a homeowners association are the acquisition, construction, management, maintenance, and care of association property. In determining whether an organization is organized and operated primarily to carry on one or more exempt functions, all the facts and circumstances of each case shall be considered. For example, when an organization provides in its articles of organization that its sole purpose is to carry on one or more exempt functions, in the absence of other relevant factors it will be considered to have met the organizational test. (The term *articles of organization* means the organization's corporate charter, trust instruments, articles of association or other instrument by which it is created.)
( 2 ) *Operated.* An organization will be treated as being operated for the purpose of carrying on one or more of the exempt functions of a homeowners association if it meets the provisions of §§ 1.528-5 and 1.528-6.
( b ) *Terms to be interpreted according to common meaning and usage.* As used in section 528 and these regulations, the terms acquisition, construction, management, maintenance, and care are to be interpreted according to their common meaning and usage. For example, maintenance of association property includes the painting and repairing of such property as well as the gardening and janitorial services associated with its upkeep. Similarly, the term *construction* of association property includes covenants or other rules for preserving the architectural and general appearance of the area. The term also includes regulations relating to the location, color and allowable building materials to be used in all structures. (For the definition of association property see § 1.528-3.)
[T.D. 7692, 45 FR 26321, Apr. 18, 1980]