alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39626.

#### RAY v. EDWARDS. RAY v. KENNESAW FINANCE CORPORATION.

39627.

Decided July 6, 1962.

*John D. Edge,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lokey & Bowden, Hamilton Lokey, Glenn Frick,*contra.

Russell, Judge.

Where as here it does not appear from the record on appeal that there has been either service or waiver of acknowledgment of service of the bill of exceptions as required by *Code Ann.*§ 6-911, this court is without jurisdiction of the writ of error. *Benefield v. Luther,*210 Ga. 544 (3) (81 SE2d 513); *Kinney v. Bell,*104 Ga. App. 398 (121 SE2d 840); *Anderson v. Heyward,*96 Ga. App. 683 (101 SE2d 110).

*Writ of error dismissed. concur.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Eberhardt, J.,*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Gehl
Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet at April 1, 2000 and condensed
consolidated statements of income for the three-month period ended April 1,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                            3254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    99554
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      42219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                154015
<PP&E>                                           83823
<DEPRECIATION>                                   45014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  224591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            61904
<BONDS>                                          53127<F2>
<COMMON>                                           557
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       99078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    224591
<SALES>                                          70696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 70696
<CGS>                                            51414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    51414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6260
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4069
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4069
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .73<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
<FN>
<F1>The Company presents receivables on a net basis in compliance with Article
10 of Regulation S-X.
<F2>Includes all non-current portion of debt obligations
<F3>The EPS under the "EPS-Primary" tag represents Basic Earnings Per Share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from September 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

Dated March 21, 2016

 

 
|   | /s/  Erin M. Rohde                 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Erin M. Rohde                           |
|   | Assistant Treasurer of                  |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company   LLC,        |
|   | as Servicer of Ford Credit   Auto Owner |
|   | Trust 2015-C                            |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of the PrincipalExecutive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas W. McMinn,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 15, 2005 |   /s/ Douglas W. McMinn     |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Douglas W. McMinn,                    |
|                 | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
-Ry 

PICK-UPDATE: 3/8/2007 

BOX 10 OF 10 

Step 2: FOR ASRC INTERNAL USE 

ONLY 

(PART A of B) 

EPA DOCKET ID: 102RQ-RN 

1) INDEX 

3) 102RQ-RN-1-2 

5) 102RQ-RN-1-4 

7) 102RQ-RN-1-6 

9) 102RQ-RN-3-1 

11) 102RQ-RN-3-3 

13) 102RQ-RN-2-1-2 

15) 102RQ-RN-2-1-4 

17) 102RQ-RN-2-2-1 

19) 102RQ-RN-2-3-1 

21) 102RQ-RN-2-4-2 

23) 102RQ-RN-2-4-4 

25) 102RQ-RN-2-4-6 

27X02RQ-RN-2-4-8 ^> 

29) 102RQ-RN-2-4-10 

31) 102RQ-RN-4-2 

33) 102RQ-RN-4-4 

35) 102RQ-RN-4-6 

37) 102RQ-RN-4-8 

39) 102RQ-RN-5-1 

Step 3: FOR ASRC INTERNAL USE 

ONLY 

CD: 

OA: / 

2) 102RQ-RN-1-1 

4) 102RQ-RN-1-3 

6) 102RQ-RN-1-5 

8) 102RQ-RN-1-7 

10) 102RQ-RN-3-2 

12) 102RQ-RN-2-1-1 

14) 102RQ-RN-2-1-3 

16) 102RQ-RN-2-1-5 

18) 102RQ-RN-2-2-2 

20) 102RQ-RN-2-4-1 

22) 102RQ-RN-2-4-3 

24) 102RQ-RN-2-4-5 

26) 102RQ-RN-2-4-7 

28) 102RQ-RN-2-4-9 

30) 102RQ-RN-4-1 

32) 102RQ-RN-4-3 

34) 102RQ-RN-4-5 

36) 102RQ-RN-4-7 

38) 102RQ-RN-4-9 

40) 102RQ-RN-5-2 

»/43\ Step 1: FOR ASRC INTERNAL USE ONLY 

Are there more documents for this Docket in another box? /*YES V NO 

*Fill out Continuation Sheet and go to Step 2 X_^X 

Internal SFUND Box Number 35 OF 283 

Initials/Date: LDS_/_3-8-2007_ 
P2 

/o?/e<p.-ie#- -z-v-s 

F.tCOr.D OF 

CO...V.JNICATION 

TO: 

%L 'fa <U>roj 

SJbJtCT 

(^>«DN_ CALL [jtulC^SHOK Q f,t l-OTRIi » QCONF-.RE.NCE 

QOTMEP IS'ECIFY) 

(F.t:trr t/f ner cl-c:»r. «_,t>»t) 

DATE V//D/fe 

:»--t \_? •' 2nSXp Ai 

X AZ-ror rmcxtionO f eOv0uuy,Vrm / /'S*- of YQ^tiOrAM^fcMc, in) )0 C^ * Pfl-tT "20 

" '•- (Vd7-V^) "^tr-—b

VJ_kkS L » OF C _>_<»-UK I LAT ID* 

?

ue<^c<sf XtX (V &KD I l\)R.C 'huiti/r,AOm+0 &<MIio nvuct idu, &Q J9cQ-<3hm*ri' 

U^nci'UL SoivvQju &r Ut, Jist J^arfiooiicaS/ctecJ LX> ***- W^^ 

p4A)pO<xJrzui*Siorr,s iz> lO-Cf*- MiO . >w. n)t,\M*s, SCU^V %oJ- V^-SpOKi__ 

ou.'VhXQob 6oJ<uO u>/>o LAJOO imuo)iieo( ov He M^i^o^o^f~ & ^ ^ 

fyiopo^JicI reuivS/*0/77& -ho io C£«_ fW- 2.0 v*yhuQyHf'Icwneytf HJ\&r ^ o 

SOUAAXL -hr ifa Jfe-h jrro Myfumcli-p <& yoo^ IC ^ PuJbXx^oOiornJ^O. 

^^I^JWiS jfaMto eytyjCuntc/ Wof nnfiu, mxuc/'CUo QAO J fetid ^ y^ffie^d'/S 

3o War ^atf'tAtnv > ^ UM^ Wttveil U*x J\ree^d- Slab*) 

% "Wife (Vbo Sou# Mc^~ #l£> Co/co/o^b ^ o^-uftSf **> ^^^ 

W ^le£/fe OhO ^^horkwf #W- *>''*» ^f^. *&&'* . 

*%**>. * w a^ a^^i^cc^ •»* *a^ "» ^^ . ^ 

^ruAvtim Put,/^yv&/At¥TMX^-

m 

1 

\XXi 

}-.:•" 

J% 

INFORMATION COPIES 

ro.y, ?V4^c OJU** A^C^ Jrl*Y.<^?(kJl<h$0^d V •XCP' ^ l t ttITJ* T»<—i 1J3I4 (7.72) "t»L*c n (.»_. H . re*** »>e_»i KHIC - MAT » C u»tt> UNTIL »upi>tT 11 U«AUIUO ,
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Docket ID: DoD 2009-OS-0116]

# AGENCY:

Defense Intelligence Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to Delete Systems of Records.

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Intelligence Agency is deleting a system of records notice from its existing inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) as amended.

# DATES:

This proposed action will be effective without further notice on September 8, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

DIA Privacy Act Coordinator, Records Management Section, 200 McDill Blvd, Washington DC 20340.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Theresa Lowery at (202) 231-1193.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Defense Intelligence Agency systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The Defense Intelligence Agency is proposing to delete a system of records notice from its existing inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

Dated: July 27, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## LDIA 0335

### SYSTEM NAME:

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Reporting Program (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10613).

### REASON:

The records contained in this system of records have been migrated into the Employee Assistance Program Case Records (EAP), an approved DIA SORN (LDIA 06-0001).

[FR Doc. E9-18903 Filed 8-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1219 CA 13-02141**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

INCREDIBLE INVESTMENTS LIMITED, ON ITS OWN AND ON BEHALF OF ONE NIAGARA, LLC, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

PAUL GRENGA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PRESIDENT OF WHITESTAR DEVELOPMENT CORP., AND AS CLAIMED CURRENT MANAGER OF ONE NIAGARA, LLC, WHITESTAR DEVELOPMENT CORP., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

LAW OFFICE OF RALPH C. LORIGO, WEST SENECA (JON F. MINEAR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

SANDERS & SANDERS, CHEEKTOWAGA (HARVEY P. SANDERS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered March 8, 2013. The order, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 985, 985).

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### Kenneth B. QUANSAH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, Los Gatos Facility; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-16626.

D.C. No. CV-00-20748-JF.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002 *.

Decided June 18, 2002.

*914Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kenneth B. Quansah, Jr. appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his second amended complaint alleging defendants violated 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 during state court eviction proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim, *Steckman v. Hart Brewing Inc.,*143 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the claims against Menyhart and Advantage Eviction Service because Quansah failed to sufficiently allege a violation of a constitutional right, *see Price v. State of Hawaii*939 F.2d 702, 707-09 (9th Cir.1991) and failed to allege facts demonstrating racial or class-based animus, *cf. Evans v. McKay,*869 F.2d 1341, 1345 (9th Cir.1989).

The district court properly dismissed the claims against the Superior Court of California and its clerk under the Eleventh Amendment. *See Greater Los Angeles Council on Deafness, Inc. v. Zolin,*812 F.2d F.2d 1103, 1110 (9th. Cir.1997).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Shirley Plummer

King, C. J., Aloorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.

Submitted October 28

decided November 20, 1968

*Dennis F. Gaffney,*assistant prosecuting attorney, on the motion, for the appellee (state).

*Roger E. Koonts,*on the motion, for the appellant (defendant).

Per Curiam.

The motion by the defendant for review of the denial by the Circuit Court of her application for a waiver of fees, costs and security was denied by us on July 26, 1967. *State*v. *Plummer,*155 Conn. 720, 231 A.2d 283. The time for reargument has long since passed. Practice Book § 703. The present motion neglects to recite that the motion for review sought an order which properly lay within the jurisdiction of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court rather than of this court. General Statutes § 51-265; Practice Book § 740.

The motion for reargument or for a determination of the basis of the decision on the motion for review is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

Solely for the purposes of complying
with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas M. Rettler, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, of Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three-month period ended March 31,
          2007 (the Quarterly Report) to which this statement is an exhibit
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gehl Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 11, 2007

| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ William D. Gehl  
| | William D. Gehl      
| | /s/ Thomas M. Rettler
| | Thomas M. Rettler
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JONATHAN GREEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D21-1398

September 3, 2021

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit 

Court for Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge.

Jonathan Green, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Brooks, 890 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2005); State v. Gutierrez, 10 So. 3d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

BLACK, SLEET, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



Date:  August 8, 2003                       /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                            --------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                            Title: President and Treasurer

                                            A signed  original  of this  written
                                            statement  required  by Section  906
                                            has been provided to CNL Income Fund
                                            VIII,  Ltd.  and will be retained by
                                            CNL  Income  Fund  VIII,   Ltd.  and
                                            furnished  to  the   Securities  and
                                            Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff
                                            upon request.
# Official Journal C 299/8 De

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 299 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 498 December 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 299

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 498 December 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 299/1 | | s2 |
| 2006/C 299/2 | | s2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

2006/C 299/1

s2

2006/C 299/2

s2

---

| | I   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | EUROPEANPARLIAMENT |
| 2006/C 299/3 | WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERList of titles of Written Questions by Members of the European Parliament indicating the number, original language, author, political group, institution addressed, date submitted and subject of the question | 1 |

I   Information

EUROPEANPARLIAMENT

2006/C 299/3

WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERList of titles of Written Questions by Members of the European Parliament indicating the number, original language, author, political group, institution addressed, date submitted and subject of the question

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CARLA WALLACE, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

ARCELORMITTAL VINTON, INC.,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00095-CV

Appeal from the

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2012-DCV-06529)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until August 27, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Alejandro Acosta, III, the Appellant’s attorney, 

prepare the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 27, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 23-0004 

IN RE THE PETITION OF 

NADINE OLIVIA NADOW 

FILED 

JUL 3 1 2023 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Suprerne Court State of iVlontana 

ORDER 

Nadine Olivia Nadow has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the 

State Bar of Montana after having been on inactive status since February 2021. 

IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of 

Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law in the state of Montana. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six months of the date of this Order, 

Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, 

MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of approved Continuing Legal Education to 

be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive status. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this 31st day of July, 2023. 

For the Court, 

07/31/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0004
Docket Number: FAA - 2013 - 0707
Opinion issued August 20 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 3
- 0 0105
- CV

——————————— BUDGET ROLLOFFS LLC , Appellant V. KIMBERLY NORTON D/B/A NORTON ENTERPR ISES , Appellee

On Appeal from the 506 th District Court Waller County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 13
- 01
- 21751

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Budget Rolloffs LLC , has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1) (“In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the2 appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless disposition would prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.”). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Appellant has not indicated that the parties agree to bear their own costs; thus, we tax all costs against appellant

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, t he court will tax costs against the appellant.”). The Clerk is directed to issue mandate immediately. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 18.1. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley , and Bland

.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 22

- 00154

- CV

IN RE Richard C. REIERSON , Trustee of the Charlotte, Brittingham & Nathaniel Family Trust , Relator

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 22, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 11, 2022, relator, Richard C. Reierson, Trustee of the Charlotte, Brittingham &

Nathaniel Family Trust

, filed a pe tition for writ of mandamus. The real parties in interest filed a

response to which relator replied. After considering the petition, response, reply, and record, this

court concludes relator did not show he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017

- PC

- 2310 , styled Stephen Josh Bell, Next Friend and Parent of Charlotte Bell, Brittingham Bell, and Nathaniel Bell, current beneficiaries of the Charlotte, Brittingham & Nathaniel Family Trust, and Interested Parties in the Estate of Kirsten Bell, deceased v. Richard Reierson, Trustee of the Charlotte, Brittingham & Nathaniel Family Trust and Independent Executor of the Estate of Kirsten Bell, deceased

, pending in the Probate Court No. 2

, Bexar County, Texas, t he Honorable Veronica Vasquez presiding.