alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.584-1 Common trust funds. ( a ) *Method of taxation.* A common trust fund maintained by a bank is not subject to taxation under this chapter and is not considered a corporation. Its participants are taxed on their proportionate share of income from the common trust fund.
( b ) *Conditions for qualification.* ( 1 ) For a fund to be qualified as a common trust fund it must be maintained by a bank (as defined in section 581) in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Comptroller of the Currency, exclusively for the collective investment and reinvestment of contributions to the fund by the bank. The bank may either act alone or with one or more other fiduciaries, but it must act solely in its capacity as one or a combination of the following: ( i ) As a trustee of a trust created by will, deed, agreement, declaration of trust, or order of court;
( ii ) as an executor of a will or as an administrator of an estate;
( iii ) as a guardian (by whatever name known under local law) of the estate of an infant, of an incompentent individual, or of an absent individual; or
( iv ) on or after October 3, 1976, as a custodian of a UniformGifts to Minors account. A Uniform Gifts to Minors account is an account established pursuant to a State law substantially similar to the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act. (*See* the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act of 1956 or the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act of 1966, as published by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.) The Commissioner will publish a list of the States whose laws he determines to be substantially similar to such uniform acts. A bank that maintains a Uniform Gifts to Minors Act account must establish, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner or his delegate, that with respect to the account the bank has duties and responsibilities similar to the duties and responsibilities of a trustee or guardian.
( 2 ) A common trust fund may be a participant in another common trust fund.
( c ) *Affiliated groups.* For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1975, two or more banks that are members of the same affiliated group (within the meaning of section 1504) are treated, for purposes of section 584, as one bank for the period of their affiliation. A common trust fund may be maintained by one or by more than one member of an affiliated group. Any member of the group may, but need not, contribute to the fund. Further, for purposes of this paragraph, members of an affiliated group may be, but need not be, co-trustees of the common trust fund.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11737, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7935, 49 FR 1694, Jan. 13, 1984]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2019

No. 04-19-00494-CR

Richard A. CANTU, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-11-293-CRW

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After we granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief, 

Appellant’s brief was due on December 9, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). After the onceextended due date, Appellant filed a second motion, which seeks a twenty-day extension of time 

to file the brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED; Appellant’s brief is due on December 30, 2019. 

Any further motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s brief is discouraged. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  	/s/Kevin Perry

Name:		  Kevin Perry
Title:	  Chief Financial Officer

Date:		  May 16, 2005
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofNovember 1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer and initial ExcludedSpecial Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, Park BridgeLender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association,as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C26 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director ofSpecial Servicing do hereby certify that:

 

1.       A review of the activities of the Excluded Special Servicer during the periodfrom January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and 

 

2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Excluded SpecialServicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018. 

 

 

/s/Daniel Marthinsen

DanielMarthinsen

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------|
JOHN L. THOMAS, II 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

December 22, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Name Change of Petitioner 

Document ID Number FAA-2007-0001-0001 

John J. Jones Investments, Inc. - Drone Services Orlando, LLC 

Gentlemen: 

611 N. Wymore Road, Suite 105 

Winter Park, Florida 32789 

Telephone (407) 843-1 290 

Facsimile (407) 425-9038 

Email: john@jlthomaslaw.com 

Attached please find Request for Name Change of Petitioner from my clients, John J. Jones 

Investments, Inc. and Drone Services Orlando, LLC 

Please advise if anything further is needed to process this Name Change of the Petitioner. 

Best regards, 

JLT/vtz 

Enclosure 

cc: John J. Jones Investments, Inc. 

cc: Drone Services Orlando, LLC 

) 
DRONE SERVICES ORLANDO, LLC 

PO Box 540118 

Orlando, Florida 32854 

Fax (407) 648-1888 

jjiii05@att.net 

12/15/2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Request for name change 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

John J. Jones Investments, Inc. (the petitioner) seeking exemption would like to 

request a name change to Drone Services Orlando, LLC. 

Our document ID Number is FAA -2007-0001-0001. 

Attached is information from the State of Florida - Divisions of Corporation 

showing Drone Services Orlando, LLC is registered with the State. 

Please advise if there is anything further needed to accompolish this request. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

John J. Jones Investments, Inc. MBR 

John J. Jones, President 

, 

c:> .. ~ (. ;e:.p~ 

Florida Site Selectors, Inc. MBR 

O.H. (Robby) Robinson, President 
Uetatl by Entity Name 

DetaU by Entity Name 

Florida Limited Liability Company 

DRONE SERVICES ORLANDO, LLC 

Filing Information 

Document Number 

FEIIEIN Number 

Date Filed 

State 

Status 

Principal Address 

620 N WYMORE RD #210 

MAITLAND, FL 32751 

Mailing Address 

PO BOX 540118 

ORLANDO, FL 32854 

L15000190001 

NONE 

11/12/2015 

FL 

ACTIVE 

Registered Agent Name & Address 

JOHN J. JONES INVESTMENTS, INC. 

620 N WYMORE RD #21 0 

MAITLAND, FL 32751 

Authorized Person(s) Detai l 

Name & Address 

TitleAMBR 

JONES, BRITI A 

503 GREENBRIAR BLVD 

ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32714 

TitleAMBR 

ECHAVARRIA, JULIAN 

601 ZIAMILANO 

APOPKA, FL 3271 2 

Title MBR 

JOHN J. JONES INVESTMENTS, INC. 

PO BOX 5401 18 

ORLANDO, FL 32854 

Page 1 of2 

http://search.sunbiz.org/lnq uiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=Entit... 12/15/2015 
. uetall by hntity Name 

Title MBR 

FLORIDA SITE SELECTORS, INC. 

620 N WYMORE RD #210 

MAITLAND, FL 32751 

Annual Reports 

No Annual Reports Filed 

Document Images 

11/12/2015 --Florida Limited Liability ._I _ _ V_ie_w_i_m_ag:;_e_i PDF_~_o_r a_t _ __, 

Page 2 of2 

http:/ /search.sunbiz.org!Inquiry /CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail ?inquirytype=Entit... 12/15/201 5
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11820 and #11821]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of North Carolina dated 07/24/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/06/2009. *Effective Date:*
                         07/24/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/22/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/26/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     New Hanover. *Contiguous Counties:* North Carolina: Brunswick, Pender. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentHomeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.437Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11820 6 and for economic injury is 11821 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is North Carolina. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: July 24, 2009. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E9-18247 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
From: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Rosalina Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/01/2012 02:29 PM

Subject: RE: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Thanks Lydia. That’s ok. Just touched base with Rosalina which was helpful. 

From: Lydia Wegman [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 2:21 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.; Karen Martin

Subject: Re: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Nathan,

I'm still travelling and Karen isn't available right now. I may be able to call you around 4:30. 

Sorry about not being able to talk right now. 

 From: "Frey, Nathan J." [Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov]

 Sent: 06/01/2012 05:59 PM GMT

 To: Lydia Wegman; Karen Martin

 Subject: RE: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Just checking in again. Do either of you have time for a quick call? 

From: Frey, Nathan J. 

Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 12:21 PM

To: Lydia Wegman; Karen Martin

Subject: RE: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Lydia – I assume since you are out of the office this week that I should be coordinating logistics etc 

through Karen. If this is the case, Karen -- it would be great to talk via phone at your earliest 

convenience. Please let me know when and what number is best to reach you. Many thanks,

Nathan

From: Lydia Wegman [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 12:03 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.; Karen Martin

Cc: Eloise Shepherd

Subject: Re: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Thanks Nathan. Yes, we do have slides that we can share in advance. Hopefully we can send 

them out this afternoon or Monday morning. 
 From: "Frey, Nathan J." [Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov]

 Sent: 06/01/2012 03:03 PM GMT

 To: Lydia Wegman; Karen Martin

 Cc: Eloise Shepherd

 Subject: RE: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Hi Lydia and Karen,

It looks like we’ve settled on 1:00-2:30 for Monday’s interagency briefing. Does EPA have briefing slides 

prepared that can be shared with reviewers in advance? Many thanks.

From: Frey, Nathan J. 

Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:01 PM

To: Lydia Wegman; Karen Martin

Subject: RE: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Thanks Lydia. Yes, we’ve heard. What time(s) works Monday for your folks? 

From: Lydia Wegman [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:22 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.; Karen Martin

Subject: Re: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Hi Nathan, 

I'm sorry I haven't been available to talk this week. I don't know if you've heard, but we got a court order today 

ordering the proposal to be signed by June 7. Thus, we may want to meet on Monday to start discussions. Let me 

know what you think. 

 From: "Frey, Nathan J." [Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov]

 Sent: 05/31/2012 06:03 PM GMT

 To: Karen Martin

 Cc: Lydia Wegman

 Subject: PM NAAQs Interagency Briefing

Hi Karen,

Thanks for your voice mail. Would Tuesday at 11:00 am work well for scheduling the interagency 

briefing for PM NAAQs? Thanks,

Nathan
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 197 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 197

 To promote clean air and to prevent the import of ``dirty'' gasoline 
                        into the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

  Mr. Baucus (for himself, Mr. Ford, Mr. Warner, Mr. Breaux, and Mr. 
Wofford) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To promote clean air and to prevent the import of ``dirty'' gasoline 
                        into the United States.

Whereas the ``Clear Air Act Amendments of 1990'' (CAAA 1990) is legislation 
        critical for preserving American health and environment;
Whereas the reformulated gasoline program is a key provision of the CAAA 1990;
Whereas the integrity of the clean fuels requirement of the CAAA necessarily 
        involves EPA verification of data submitted;
Whereas the EPA must be able to verify with certainty the foreign submitted data 
        substantiating 1990 baseline standards of foreign refiners of 
        reformulated gasoline;
Whereas the final reformulated gasoline rule issued by EPA on December 15, 1993, 
        recognizes the difficulty EPA has verifying the baseline of gasoline 
        produced abroad and attempts to protect the integrity of the clean fuels 
        requirement in the CAAA 1990;
Whereas foreign refiners might be entitled to claim that the December 15 EPA 
        rule denies them national treatment obligations owed them by the United 
        States under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT);
Whereas the GATT provides a recognized exception to GATT obligations of 
        ``national treatment'' by virtue of a measure's importance to protecting 
        human, animal or plant life or health; and
Whereas the reformulated gasoline EPA rule can be reasonably found to fall 
        within this GATT article XX exception: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the reformulated 
gasoline rule should stand as previously promulgated; and that the 
United States Trade Representative should vigorously defend the 
reformulated gasoline rule under the GATT; and that if the United 
States re-opens the reformulated gasoline rule, the new proposed rule 
to permit foreign refineries to use their own 1990 baselines should be 
subject to rigorous and extensive public notice and comment to ensure 
that it does not consequently result in an increase in the levels of 
ozone over the current reformulated gasoline rule, and does not result 
in discrimination against domestic refiners of reformulated gasoline.

                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued August 20, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00105-CV

———————————

BUDGET ROLLOFFS LLC, Appellant

V.

KIMBERLY NORTON D/B/A NORTON ENTERPRISES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 506th District Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 13-01-21751

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Budget Rolloffs LLC, has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1) (“In accordance with a motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the 
2

appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless disposition would prevent a 

party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.”). We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. Appellant has not indicated that the parties agree to 

bear their own costs; thus, we tax all costs against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the 

appellant.”). The Clerk is directed to issue mandate immediately. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
Order entered January 3 0 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01000
- CV
RUSSELL D. ABEREGG , Appellant

V. MONICA CESCHAN , Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 12
- 00023



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 29, 2014 motion to reset submission of his appeal to a date after February 15, 2014 because he is constructing an amended brief. This case has already been submitted without oral argum ent on January 28, 2014. We therefore DENY appellant’s request to extend the time for submission.
We also DENY appellant’s motion to the extent that he requests an extension of time to
file an amended brief. Appellant filed his original brief on May 20, 2013. On May 23, 2014, we sent appellant a defective brief notice and instructed him to file an amended brief correcting the deficiencies within ten days. Appellant did not file an amended brief as instructed or seek an extension of time to file an amend ed brief

. Rather, he filed a motion for remand for a hearing. We denied his motion for remand by order dated July 2, 2013 and informed appellant that theappeal would be submitted on the brief he initially filed. On August 1, 2013, appellant sought

clar ification of the July 2, 2013 order and a thirty

- day extension of time to file a brief. We denied appellant’s request for an extension of time to file a brief by order dated August 14, 2013. In his motion, appellant also presented additional points labele d (a) through (g) as an “amendment” to his brief. We will consider these points to the extent they concern arguments already raised in appellant’s initial brief.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Allen TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6246.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2002.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Robert Allen Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Lee Evans, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Allen Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Taylor,*Nos. CR-99 — 567—S; CA-01-4256-S (D. Md. filed Jan. 3, 2002 & entered Jan. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 5, 2019 s0225

Order 

Clerk

March 5, 2019

156724

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156724

COA: 339876

Oakland CC: 2016-258995-FC

ERIK DAVON THOMPKINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2017 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for further 

proceedings consistent with this order. On remand, appointed counsel may file, within 

six months of the date of this order, any necessary or appropriate postconviction motions 

in the trial court as to the defendant’s December 13, 2016 plea-based conviction. If a 

postconviction motion is filed in the trial court, counsel may file an application for leave 

to appeal to the Court of Appeals within six months of the order disposing of that motion. 

The defendant was effectively deprived, through no fault of his own, of the opportunity to 

have appointed appellate counsel file a timely motion to withdraw the plea. The Court of 

Appeals erred when it concluded that the defendant had failed to demonstrate that the 

issue should be decided initially by the trial court. In all other respects, leave to appeal is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should 

now be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.