alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39701.

#### NICHOLSON v. HARRISON et al.

Eberhardt, Judge.

Where the holder of a bill of sale to secure debt on crops foreclosed it as a mortgage, and placed the execution in the hands of the sheriff, who notified tenants of the defendant in fi. fa. that the crops, then being gathered, were under levy, and likewise notified mills to which the corn and peanuts were being transported for sale though making no actual seizure of the crops and making no entry of levy on the fi. fa., and where the owner of the lands on which the crops were grown sued out a distress warrant for rent and placed it in the hands of the sheriff, who made an entry of levy thereon as to a portion of the crops, though no actual seizure thereof; and where thereafter the landlord brought a petition to the City Court of Cairo, wherein the foreclosure and distress warrant were pending, in the nature of a money rule against the sheriff, the plaintiff in the foreclosure proceeding and against the two mills where the com and peanuts had been delivered, and where the court directed the mills to pay into the registry of the court the proceeds from the sale of the com and peanuts and thereafter entered a judgment directing disbursement of the funds, first to the landlord, then to the payment of costs and the balance to the holder of the bill of sale to secure debt. *Held:*

Although there was no actual seizure of the com and peanuts by the sheriff, and although they were sold through the mills to which they had been delivered without any judicial process, and although the proceedings were in the City Court of Cairo, having no equity jurisdiction, all parties having acquiesced in the sale of the crops and the payment of the *588pi’oceeds into the registry of the court, the matter will be treated as though the crops had been sold at a judicial sale. Under those circumstances it is well settled that the lien of the landlord for rent is superior to the claim of the holder of the bill of sale to secure debt and there was no error in the judgment fixing priority in the disbursement of the funds. *Code*§§ 61-203, 67-1105.

Decided September 21, 1962

Rehearing denied October 2, 1962.

*Willard H. Chason,*for plaintiff in error.

*Bell & Barker, B. A. Bell,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Sidney Gartel

*Lawrence B. Schwarts,*in support of the petition.

*David B. Cohen,*prosecuting attorney, in opposition.

Submitted July 9

decided October 2, 1963

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
427 A.2d 1208

#### Commonwealth v. Evans, Appellant.

Submitted April 12, 1979.

Daniel R. Lovette, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

Gerard Long, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00359-CV

Eunice Wells

v.

Target Corporation

§

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Parker County (CIV-13-0258)

April 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

Dissent by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further 

proceedings.

It is further ordered that Appellee Target Corporation shall pay all of the 

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
EXHIBIT 10.2

                            FIRST AMENDMENT
                        TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is
made and entered into as of the 4th day of August, 2006, between Giant
Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and Kim H.
Bullerdick (the "Executive").

                              RECITALS

     A.     Pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement (the
            "Agreement"), dated as of December 12, 2003, the Company
            retained the Executive as an executive of the Company, for the
            consideration and on the terms set forth in the Agreement.
            Capitalized terms used herein that are not defined shall have
            the meaning given to such terms in the Agreement.

     B.     The parties now desire to amend certain provisions of the
            Agreement.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of
which are hereby acknowledged, each of the Company and the Executive,
intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

                                 AGREEMENT

     1.     Each reference to "two years", "a two year period", or "two
            fiscal years" in (i) the first paragraph of Section 4.1
            (including the heading), (ii) the heading for Section 4.2 and
            the first paragraph of Section 4.2, (iii) Section 4.2(b), and
            (iv) the first paragraph of Section 4.3 (including the
            heading) is hereby revised to refer to "three years", "a three
            year period", or "three fiscal years", respectively.

     2.     The first line of Section 4.2(b) up to the colon is hereby
            revised to read as follows:

            "pay to the Executive an amount equal to three times the sum
            of:"

     3.     This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
            each of which will be deemed an original but all of which
            taken together will constitute one and the same instrument.

     4.     Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all other
            terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
            force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment
as of the date first above written.


COMPANY:                              EXECUTIVE:

Giant Industries, Inc.                /s/ KIM H. BULLERDICK
                                      ___________________________
                                        Kim H. Bullerdick
By: /s/ LARRY L.DEROIN
   _________________________
Name:  Larry L. DeRoin
Title: Chairman,
       Compensation Committee
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL 

SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION 

PREVENTION

PC Code: 080808

DP Barcode: 432884 

Date: April 21, 2016

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Propazine: Addendum to “Preliminary Risk Assessment for Registration Review 

of Propazine” for Update on ECOTOX Database Query 

TO: Steven Snyderman, Chemical Review Manager 

 Avivah Jakob, Team Leader 

 Kelly Sherman, Branch Chief 

 Risk Management and Implementation Branch 3 

 Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P) 

FROM: Brian D. Kiernan, Biologist 

Environmental Risk Branch 6

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) 

THRU: Monica Wait, Risk Assessment Process Leader 

 Mark Corbin, Branch Chief 

Environmental Risk Branch 6 

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) 

The Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) is providing an addendum to the 

preliminary environmental fate and ecological risk assessment (PRA) conducted in support of 

the Registration Review of the triazine herbicide, propazine (PC Code: 080808)1

. This 

addendum clarifies the role of open literature in the assessment. The ECOTOX database section 

was inadvertently left out of the October 2015 PRA for propazine. 

A comprehensive open literature query by the ORD-Duluth contractor of the ECOTOX database 

was not conducted for propazine. However, queries of the publically available version of the 

ECOTOX database were conducted on May 28, 2015 and again on April 12, 2016. 

                                                            

1

 Preliminary Risk Assessment for Registration Review of Propazine. October 28, 2015. Colletti, M. and Kiernan, 

B. DP 428090. 
The query was limited to open literature articles containing information regarding propazine 

apical endpoints reflecting survival, growth and reproduction. The resulting searches provided 

no reported endpoints that were more sensitive than those used in the October 2015 PRA, and 

thus those results did not alter the PRA’s risk conclusions. EFED notes that some endpoints, for 

atypical test species, may be useful for characterization in a future endangered species 

assessment. 

For terrestrial species, 126 endpoints were reported in ECOTOX while only 22 aquatic endpoints 

were reported. Many of the endpoints are simply reproduced from Office of Pesticide Programs’ 

reports while some others are taken from studies that have durations or reported exposure in 

units incompatible with EFED’s risk assessment process.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue31st FloorNew York, New York 10179  RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C30 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C30 Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  March 1, 2016 /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 15, 2021

NO. 03-19-00552-CR

Jonathan Matthew Maldonado, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgments of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41426

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

JOSHUA THOMAS BENNETT

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 589

Filed: August 11, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho,

Bonneville County. Hon. Joel E. Tingey , District Judge.

Appeal from judgment of conviction and unified fifteen

- year sentence with three

year determinate term for conspiracy to deliver marijuana, dismissed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Eric D. Fredericksen , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Joshua Thomas Bennett ple d guilty to conspiracy to deliver

marijuana, with an enhancement for having previously been convicted of delivering a controlled

substance, Idaho C ode § § 37

- 2732(a)(1)(B), 37

- 2732(f), 37

- 2739A. The district court sentenced

Bennett to a unified term of fif teen years, with a minimum term of confinement of three years, to

be served concurrently with a previously imposed sentence. Bennett appeals, contending that the

district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Bennett’s appeal must be dismissed because he waived the right to appeal with respect to

the issues that he now attempts to present to this Court. Idaho Criminal Rule 11(d)(3)2 specifically contemplates that a defendant’s right of appeal may be waived as a component of a

plea agreement. Such waivers are enforceable when they are made knowingly, voluntarily, and

intelligently. State v. Murphy , 125 Idaho 456, 457, 872 P.2d 719, 720 (1994). Bennett does not

dispute the validity of his waiver. Because Bennett has waived his rig ht to appeal, this appeal is

dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RAHEEM WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 26 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in precluding the questioning of jurors

about their views on guns and gun violence during voir dire ?
www.lilly.com 

i% 

M , Eli Lilly and Company 

Lilly Corporate Center 

^cpf r •'OFliAriOi'i Indianapolis, Indiana 46285 

"'•-'' ' -I ; U.S.A. 

Phone 317 276 2000 

March 9, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and 

Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in 

reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by 

U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and 

Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's 

financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. 

American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of 

business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air service 

since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from 

these proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need 

your help to make the JFK/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from 

Kennedy to Haneda! 

ley 

Director, Travel & Meeting Services 

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 

Answers That Matter.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 232

To congratulate the Houston Rockets for winning the 1994 National

Basketball Association Championship.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 23 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. GRAMM (for himself and Mrs. HUTCHISON) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To congratulate the Houston Rockets for winning the 1994

National Basketball Association Championship.

Whereas the Houston Rockets began the 1993–94 season

with a 15–0 start, tying an NBA record;

Whereas the Rockets finished the 1993–94 season with a 58–

24 record, second best in the NBA, and won the Midwest

Division for the second consecutive year;

Whereas second-year coach Rudy Tomjanovich and his assistants helped transform the Rockets from a solid playoff

team into the NBA’s best;

Whereas Hakeem Olajuwon was named the NBA’s most valuable player for the regular season, defensive player of the

year, and most valuable player of the NBA Finals;
2

SRES 232 IS

Whereas the Rockets won a hard-fought seven game series

with the New York Knicks in which each game was decided by less than ten points; and

Whereas the Rockets gave the city of Houston its first NBA

Championship, a unique and special accomplishment in

Houston sports history: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the Houston

2 Rockets for their outstanding heart, resolve, and deter3 mination in winning the 1994 National Basketball Asso4 ciation Championship.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3200 Finger joint metal/metal constrained uncemented prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A finger joint metal/metal constrained uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a metacarpophalangeal or proximal interphalangeal (finger) joint. The device prevents dislocation in more than one anatomic plane and consists of two components which are linked together. This generic type of device includes prostheses made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, or protheses made from alloys and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to prostheses intended for use without bone cement (§ 888.3027).
( b ) *Classification.* Class III.
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before December 26, 1996 for any finger joint metal/metal constrained uncemented prosthesis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before December 26, 1996 been found to be substantially equivalent to a finger joint metal/metal constrained uncemented prosthesis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other finger joint metal/metal constrained uncemented prosthesis shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 50709, Sept. 27, 1996]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary.

# ACTION:

National Biodefense Science Board; Notification of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

The Secretary of Health and Human Services has renewed the National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) charter for an additional two-year period through July 3, 2011.

# SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

 As stipulated by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Section 9(c), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is hereby giving notice of the renewal of the NBSB charter for an additional two-year period. The Board shall provide expert advice and guidance to the Secretary on scientific, technical, and other matters of special interest to the Department of Health and Human Services regarding current and future chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological agents, whether naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate. The Board may also provide advice and guidance to the Secretary on other matters related to public health emergency preparedness and response.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        CAPT Leigh A. Sawyer, D.V.M., M.P.H., Executive Director, National Biodefense Science Board, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 330 C Street, SW., Switzer Building Room 5127, Washington, DC 20447; 202-205-3815;                         *fax:*                         202-205-8508;                         *e-mail address: leigh.sawyer@hhs.gov.*

Dated: July 23, 2009.

Nicole Lurie,

Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

[FR Doc. E9-18375 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-37-P
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 30

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 16 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, February 16, 1995, it stand ad4 journed until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 21, 1995,

5 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified

6 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res7 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

8 recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday,

9 February 16, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the

10 majority leader or his designee, in accordance with this

11 resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon, or

12 at such time on that day as may be specified by the major13 ity leader or his designee in the motion to recess or ad-
2

HCON 30 RDS

1 journ, on Wednesday, February 22, 1995, or until noon

2 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem3 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

4 whichever occurs first.

5 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority

6 leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

7 the minority leader of the House and the minority leader

8 of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and

9 Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their opin10 ion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives February 16,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Order entered December 1 5 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 01546 - CV OKLAHOMA SURETY COMP ANY, Appellant /Cross - Appellee V. STEVE NOVIELLO, ASSI GNEE OF METRO TOWNHO MES & HOMES, INC. AN D METRO TOWNHOMES LIMI TED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee /Cross - Appellant

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10 - 00335



### O RDER The Court GRANTS appellant /cross

- appellee ’s unopposed motion to file a post

submission letter brief. The le tter brief received on December 11, 2013 is considered filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS PRESIDING JUSTICE