alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 95

To designate October 1993 as ‘‘National Breast Cancer Awareness Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 19 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. PELL (for himself, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BOREN, Mr. COATS, Mr.

COCHRAN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. DANFORTH, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr. DODD, Mr.

DORGAN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FORD, Mr. GLENN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr.

HATCH, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. MACK, Mr. MATHEWS, Mr.

MITCHELL, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SIMON, Mr. STEVENS,

and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following joint resolution; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate October 1993 as ‘‘National Breast Cancer

Awareness Month’’.

Whereas breast cancer will strike an estimated 182,000

women and 1,000 men in the United States in 1993;

Whereas the risk of developing breast cancer increases as a

woman grows older;

Whereas breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer

death in women, and will kill an estimated 46,000 women

and 300 men in 1993;

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for localized breast cancer

has risen from 78 percent in the 1940’s to over 90 percent today;
2

•SJ 95 IS

Whereas most breast cancers are detected by the woman herself;

Whereas educating both the public and health care providers

about the importance of early detection will result in reducing breast cancer mortality;

Whereas appropriate use of screening mammography, in conjunction with clinical examination and breast self-examination, can result in the detection of many breast cancers early in their development and increase the survival

rate to nearly 100 percent;

Whereas data from controlled trials clearly demonstrate that

deaths from breast cancer are significantly reduced in

women who have been screened by mammography;

Whereas many women are reluctant to have screening mammograms for a variety of reasons, such as the cost of

testing, lack of information, or fear;

Whereas access to screening mammography is directly related

to socioeconomic status;

Whereas increased awareness about the importance of screening mammography will result in the procedure being regularly requested by the patient and recommended by the

health care provider; and

Whereas it is projected that more women will use this lifesaving test as it becomes increasingly available and affordable: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That October 1993 is designated as ‘‘National Breast

4 Cancer Awareness Month’’ and the President is authorized
3

•SJ 95 IS

1 and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the

2 people of the United States to observe the month with ap3 propriate programs and activities.

Æ
#### § 1.662(b)-1 Character of amounts; when no charitable contributions are made.

In determining the amount includible in the gross income of a beneficiary, the amounts which are determined under section 662(a) and §§ 1.662(a)-1 through 1.662(a)-4 shall have the same character in the hands of the beneficiary as in the hands of the estate or trust. The amounts are treated as consisting of the same proportion of each class of items entering into the computation of distributable net income as the total of each class bears to the total distributable net income of the estate or trust unless the terms of the governing instrument specifically allocate different classes of income to different beneficiaries, or unless local law requires such an allocation. For this purpose, the principles contained in § 1.652(b)-1 shall apply.
|                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  				Home | Contact Us | Site Map | Search | The "About the Clinical Center" navigation menu has been enchanced by javascript. You may also reach the non-javascript version from here. | The "For Researchers and Physicians" navigation menu has been enchanced by javascript. You may also reach the non-javascript version from here. | The "Participate in Clinical Studies" navigation menu has been enchanced by javascript. You may also reach the non-javascript version from here. |
|                                                                               |

| Back to: Clinical Center Home Page  Past Clinical Center News
**2015**
- January ( html  |  pdf )    (357 KB)
- February ( html  |  pdf )    (432 KB)
- March ( html  |  pdf )    (290 KB)
- April ( html  |  pdf )    (455 KB)
- May ( html  |  pdf )    (352 KB)

**2014**
- January ( html  |  pdf )    (354 KB)
- February ( html  |  pdf )    (350 KB)
- March ( html  |  pdf )    (609 KB)
- April ( html  |  pdf )    (452 KB)
- May ( html  |  pdf )    (333 KB)
- June ( html  |  pdf )    (316 KB)
- July ( html  |  pdf )    (548 KB)
- August ( html  |  pdf )    (431 KB)
- September ( html  |  pdf )    (613 KB)
- October ( html  |  pdf )    (449 KB)
- November ( html  |  pdf )    (471 KB)
- December ( html  |  pdf )    (363 KB)

**Additional past *Clinical Center News* issues by year**
- 2013
- 2012
- 2011
- 2010
- 2009
- 2008
- 2007
- 2006
- 2005
- 2004
- 2003
- 2002
- 2001
- 2000
- 1999
- 1998
- 1997
- 1996

NOTE: PDF documents require the free Adobe Reader.

This page last updated on 07/01/2015
Accessibility  |  DisclaimerPrivacy Statement  |  FOIANational Institutesof Health Department of Healthand Human Services                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1.466-4 Manner of and time for making election under section 373(c) of the Revenue Act of 1978. ( a ) *In general.* Section 373(c)(2) of the Revenue Act of 1978 (92 Stat. 2865) provides an election for taxpayers who satisfy the requirements of section 373(c)(2)(A) (i) and (ii) of the Act. The election is made with respect to a method of accounting for the redemption costs of discount coupons used by the electing taxpayer in a continuous period of one or more taxable years ending before January 1, 1979. The election must be made in the manner prescribed by this section. The election does not require the prior consent of the Internal Revenue Service.
( b ) *Manner of and time for making election* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the election under section 373(c) of the Revenue Act of 1978 is made by filing a statement of election containing the information described in paragraph (c) of this section with the taxpayer's income tax return for the taxpayer's first taxable year ending after December 31, 1978. The election must be made not later than the time prescribed by law (including extensions thereof) for filing the income tax return for the taxpayer's first taxable year ending after December 31, 1978. Thus, the election may not be made with an amended income tax return for such year filed after the time prescribed (including extensions) for filing the original return.
( 2 ) *Transitional rule.* If the last day of the time prescribed by law (including extensions thereof) for filing a taxpayer's income tax return for the taxpayer's first taxable year ending after December 31, 1978, falls before December 3, 1979, and the taxpayer does not make an election in the manner prescribed by paragraph (b)(1) of this section, an election is made under section 373(c) of the Act and this section with respect to a continuous period if— ( i ) Within the time prescribed by law (including extensions thereof) for filing the taxpayer's income tax return for the taxpayer's first taxable year ending after December 31, 1978, the taxpayer has made a reasonable effort to notify the Commissioner of the taxpayer's intent to make election under section 373(c) of the Act with respect to the continuous period, and
( ii ) Before January 2, 1980, the taxpayer files a statement of election containing the information described in paragraph (c) of this section to be associated with the taxpayer's income tax return for the taxpayer's first taxable year ending after December 31, 1978.
( c ) *Required information.* The statement of election required by paragraph (b) of this section must indicate that the taxpayer (identified by name, address, and taxpayer identification number) is making an election under section 373(c) of the Revenue Act of 1978 and must set forth the taxable years in the continuous period for which the election is made. The statement of election should be made on the same form 3115 on which the taxpayer has made a statement of election under section 466. The Form 3115 need contain no information other than that required by this paragraph or paragraph (c) of § 1466-3.
[T.D. 8022, 50 FR 18478, May 1, 1985]
# t~issouri e;;.a;;;s•"':r&'·M

601 Historic 66 W Waynesville, Mo 65583 Phone: 573-774-6171 Fax: 573-774-5()47 www.waynesvillemo.org

September 24, 2012



### Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis US Department ofTransportation 

### 400 Seventh 

### St, S.W. Washington, DC 

### 20590

Dear Mr. DeVany:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Essential Air Services proposals submitted for air service at the Waynesville/St. Robert Regional Airport at Forney Field on Fort Leonard Wood. Our commitment to air service for our communities led to a unique partnership between the Cities of Waynesville, 

### St. Robert and Fort Leonard Wood. As the civilian sponsors ofthe existing joint use Agreement on Fort Leonard Wood, the continuance ofviable 

### air service from the Fort Leonard Wood Region is of prime importance to the Cities ofSt. Robert and Waynesville and our regional neighbors.**""''"'~** 

# BERT**111o..~\lfl,\:f>AVi'fl:ll'\ ",ti~t**  A**(Jr~i'tll~>l~l·tr. \I~V,~!{h(~** **~~.J** 'JJ:ll'>li'lllla(l'\ii!O')**~~~** W•**'oll·l(ld~) Wrl\~.l.lir.trtl.HI.Hn** 

Although, we were pleased with the submitted proposals, based on our review ofthe EAS proposals and Discussions with Fort Leonard Wood official, the Cities ofWaynesville and St. Robert recommend accepting the proposal submitted by Cape Air. The cities are extremely pleased with the performance of Cape Air which has resulted in a growing passenger service in this area. We recommend Cape Air as the best balance between value and service for our community.

On behalf of the Cities ofWaynesville and St. Robert, thank you for your continued support of the EAS program. Please do not hesitate to contact us ifyou need further input.

Sincerely,



### Mayor Luge Hardman City ofWaynesville

# /.t-~-;t:L-**~~~ t~~**  · Mayor George Sanders

City of St. Robert
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0028

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY JOHN STRYKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 1 2021

12/01/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0028
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3849

_____________________________
P HILLIP K ESSLER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Francis Allman , Judge

. July 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , C.J., and B.L. T HOMAS and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Phillip Kessler, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: DESIGNATION OF CHAIR AND

VICE-CHAIR OF THE DISCIPLINARY 

BOARD OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

:

No. 288

DISCIPLINARY BOARD APPOINTMENT 

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2016, Jane Gowen Penny, Esquire, is 

hereby designated as Chair and David E. Schwager, Esquire, as Vice-Chair of the 

Disciplinary Board of Pennsylvania commencing April 1, 2016.

Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HealthChoice, Inc.  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A  for  the  period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
 with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the
 "Report"), I, Dr. J. W. Stucki,  Chief Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,
 certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 1350,  as adopted pursuant to S 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

           (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements of  Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)  The information contained in  the Report fairly presents,  in
           all material  respects,  the  financial condition  and  result  of
           operations of the Company.



 /s/ Dr. J. W. Stucki


 Dr. J. W. Stucki

 Chief Executive Officer

 July 14, 2006
#### § 1.9006 Statutory provisions; Tax Reform Act of 1969.

Section 946 of the Tax Reform Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 729) provides as follows:

Sec. 946. *Interest and penalties in case of certain taxable years*—(a) *Interest on underpayment.* Notwithstanding section 6601 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, in the case of any taxable year ending before the date of the enactment of this Act, no interest on any underpayment of tax, to the extent such underpayment is attributable to the amendments made by this Act, shall be assessed or collected for any period before the 90th day after such date.

(b) *Declarations of estimated tax.* In the case of a taxable year beginning before the date of the enactment of this Act, if any taxpayer is required to make a declaration or amended declaration of estimated tax, or to pay any amount or additional amount of estimated tax, by reason of the amendments made by this Act, such amount or additional amount shall be paid ratably on or before each of the remaining installment dates for the taxable year beginning with the first installment date on or after the 30th day after such date of enactment. With respect to any declaration or payment of estimated tax before such first installment date, sections 6015, 6154, 6654, and 6655 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 shall be applied without regard to the amendments made by this Act. For purposes of this subsection, the term “installment date” means any date on which, under section 6153 or 6154 of such Code (whichever is applicable), an installment payment of estimated tax is required to be made by the taxpayer.

[T.D. 7088, 36 FR 3052, Feb. 17, 1971]
§ 1.954(c)(6)-1 Certain cases in which section 954(c)(6) exception not available. ( a ) *Cross-references to other rules.* For a non-exclusive list of rules that in certain cases limit the applicability of the exception to foreign personal holding company income under section 954(c)(6), see— ( 1 ) Section 1.245A-5(d) (rules regarding the application of section 954(c)(6) to extraordinary disposition amounts);
( 2 ) Section 1.245A-5(f) (rules regarding the application of section 954(c)(6) to tiered extraordinary reduction amounts);
( 3 ) Section 1.245A(e)-1(c) (rules regarding tiered hybrid dividends);
( 4 ) Section 1.367(b)-4(e)(4) (rules regarding income inclusion and gain recognition in certain exchanges following an inversion transaction);
( 5 ) Section 964(e)(4)(A) (rules regarding certain gain from the sale or exchange of stock that is recharacterized as a dividend); and
( 6 ) Section 1.7701(l)-4(e) (rules regarding recharacterization of certain transactions following an inversion transaction).
( b ) *Applicability date.* This section applies as of August 27, 2020.
[T.D. 9909, 85 FR 53097, Aug. 27, 2020]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2637

ARNOLD VANCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL HOLLAND, Trustee; DONALD PIERCE, JR.,

Trustee; JOHN WALTON, Trustee; JOSEPH J.

STAHL, II, Trustee; TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED

MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1974 PENSION TRUST,

United Mine Workers of America,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District

Judge. (CA-97-269-B)

Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999

Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnold Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Mims, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF

AMERICA, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arnold Vance appeals a district court order granting summary

judgment to the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974

Pension Trust, finding that the Trustees’ decision to deny benefits

under the pension plan was not an abuse of discretion in this

action filed pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security

Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1132(a)(1)(B) (West Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record de novo and agree with the district

court that the Trustees did not abuse their discretion. See

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 115 (1989);

Brogan v. Holland, 105 F.3d 158, 161 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly,

we affirm the district court order. See Vance v. Holland, No. CA97-269-B (W.D. Va. Oct. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
balance sheet of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. at March 31, 2000, and its statement
of income for the three  months then ended and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference  to the Form 10Q of CNL Income  Fund VIII, Ltd.  for the three  months
ended March 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                                         1,664,519
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  53,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                   17,494
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         17,454,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,060,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,400,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,185,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,400,410
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               793,091
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                657,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            657,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   657,317
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its  industry,  CNL Income Fund VIII,  Ltd, has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 230 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 230

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the sine die adjournment of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Fourth Congress.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 230

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Monday, 
September 30, 1996, or of Tuesday, October 1, 1996, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by the Majority Leader, or his 
designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, and that when the Senate adjourns on Monday, 
September 30, 1996, or Tuesday, October 1, 1996, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by the Majority Leader, or his 
designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```