### 58989 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2012 / Notices

denied the August 4, 2011, Petition (Petition), submitted under title V of the Clean Air Act (Act) by WildEarth Guardians (Petitioner), to object to WDEQ’s June 7, 2011 Permit (Permit) issued to Cheyenne Light, Fuel & Power (CLF&P) for their Wygen II power plant (Wygen II).

Pursuant to sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the Act, a petition for judicial review of those portions of the Order that deny issues in the Petition may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register

. **ADDRESSES :**  You may review copies of the final Order, the Petition, and other supporting information at the EPA Region 8 Office, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the individual listed in the **FOR**
**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section to view the copies of the final Order, the Petition, and other supporting information. You may view the hard copies Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. If you wish to examine these documents, you should make an appointment at least 24 hours in advance. Additionally, the final Order for CLF&P Wygen II is available electronically at: http://www. epa.gov/region07/air/title5/petitiondb/ petitions/wygen2

_response2011.pdf.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Donald Law, Air Program (8P–AR), EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202–1129. Phone: (303) 312–7015. Email: law.donald@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Act affords EPA a 45-day period to review and object to, as appropriate, a title V operating permit proposed by State permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes any person to petition the EPA Administrator, within 60 days after the expiration of this review period, to object to a title V operating permit if EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based only on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period provided by the State, unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues during the comment period or the grounds for the issues arose after this period. EPA received a petition from WildEarth Petitioner dated August 4, 2011, requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the Permit to CLF&P for the Wygen II power plant located in Campbell County, Wyoming. The Petition alleges that WDEQ failed to respond to comments on the draft permit. On August 23, 2012, the Administrator issued an Order denying the Petition. The Order explains the reasons behind EPA’s conclusions.

Dated: September 11, 2012. James B. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2012–23590 Filed 9–24–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9720–7]**

**Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement for the**  **Buckbee-Mears Co. Superfund Site in Cortland, NY, Cortland County** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice; request for public
comment.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with Section 122 (h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement for recovery of past response costs concerning the Buckbee-Mears Co. Superfund Site located in Cortland, Cortland County, New York, (the ‘‘Site’’) with the State Bank of India, New York Branch (the ‘‘Bank’’). Pursuant to the settlement EPA will receive: (1) All funds in an escrow account with accrued interest(approximately $116,500); (2) Twentyfive percent of any funds the Bank collects from the principals of International Electron Devices (USA), LLC, the current owner and past operator of the Site at the time of disposal; and (3) A share of the proceeds from the sale of two parcels of land within the Site (‘‘Properties’’) following the Bank’s foreclosure sale and distribution of certain amounts to the City of Cortland (‘‘City’’) and Cortland County (‘‘County’’) in settlement of their respective tax liens. The sales proceeds shall be distributed as follows: (a) The Bank will pay to the City the greater of $302,881 or 15% after the Bank is paid $150,000 attributable to the costs of marketing and selling the Properties; (b) The Bank will pay to the County $2,120; and (c) Any proceeds from the foreclosure sale remaining after the above payments will be distributed in proportion to the following lien amounts: (1) For EPA, $8,323.204; (2) for the Bank, $8,434,911; (3) for the City, $1,199,043 minus the greater of $302,881 or fifteen percent (15%) of the proceeds from the sale of the Properties. The settlement also includes a covenant not to sue the settling party pursuant to Sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, for Existing Contamination, as defined in the settlement, at the Site. For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

**DATES :**  Comments must be provided within thirty days of the publication of this notice.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments should be addressed to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Regional Counsel, 290 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10007–1866 and should refer to the Buckbee-Mears Co. Superfund Site located in Cortland, New York, Cortland County, EPA Region II Docket No. CERCLA–02–
2012–2017.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Regional Counsel, 290 Broadway, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10007–1866, Attention: Marla E. Wieder, Assistant Regional Counsel at (212) 637–3184.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  A copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from Marla Wieder, Assistant Regional Counsel at the address above, or via email at wieder.marla@epa.gov.

Dated: July 20, 2012. John LaPadula, Deputy Director, Emergency & Remedial Response Division.
[FR Doc. 2012–23587 Filed 9–24–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**EXPORT–IMPORT BANK**

**[Public Notice 2012–0505]**

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; Comment**  **Request**

**AGENCY :**  Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

**ACTION :**  Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

Form Title: EIB 11–05 Exporter’s Certificate for Loan Guarantee & MT Insurance Programs
**SUMMARY :**  The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,


### 58990 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 186 / Tuesday, September 25, 2012 / Notices

invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

Ex-Im Bank’s borrowers, financial institution policy holders and guaranteed lenders provide this form to U.S. exporters, who certify to the eligibility of their exports for Ex-Im Bank support. For direct loans and loan guarantees, the completed form is required to be submitted at time of disbursement and held by either the guaranteed lender or Ex-Im Bank. For MT insurance, the completed forms are held by the financial institution, only to be submitted to Ex-Im Bank in the event of a claim filing. Ex-Im Bank believes that EIB 11–05 requires emergency approval in order to continue operation of its long- and medium-term financing programs. It is an integral component of the programs and is heavily used.

Lack of an emergency approval of this form would preclude our ability to continue operation of its long- and medium-term financial institution programs. Ex-Im Bank developed the referenced form to obtain exporter certifications regarding the export transaction, content sourcing, and their eligibility to participate in USG programs. These details are necessary to determine the value and legitimacy of Ex-Im Bank financing support and claims submitted. It also provides the financial institutions a check on the export transaction’s eligibility at the time it is fulfilling a financing request.

Accordingly, Ex-Im Bank requests emergency approval of EIB 11–05 in order to continue operation of these important export programs.

The form can be viewed at: www. exim.gov/pub/pending/eib11-05.pdf.

**DATES :**  Comments should be received on or before October 25, 2012 to be assured of consideration.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments may be submitted electronically on WWW. REGULATIONS.GOV or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 3048–XXXX.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Titles and Form Number EIB 11–05 Exporter’s Certificate for Direct Loan, Loan Guarantee & MT Insurance Programs

OMB Number: 3048–0043. Type of Review: New. Need and Use: The information collected will provide information needed to determine compliance and content for transaction requests submitted to the Export-Import Bank under its insurance, guarantee, and direct loan programs.

Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export of U.S. goods and services.

Annual Number of Respondents: 4,000.

Estimated Time per Respondent: 30 minutes.

Total Burden: 2,000 hours. Government Reviews only forms when a claim is filed—in FY 2011 54 claims were filed utilizing this form.

Government Annual Burden Hours:
54.

Frequency of Reporting or Use: As needed.

Total Cost to the Government: $2,090.88.

Sharon A. Whitt, Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012–23561 Filed 9–24–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6690–01–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications**  **Commission**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.

**DATES :**  Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before November 26, 2012. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

**ADDRESSES :**  Direct all PRA comments to the Federal Communications Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov and Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0692. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Title: Sections 76.802 and 76.804, Home Wiring Provisions; Section76.613, Interference from a Multichannel Video Programming Distributor (MVPD).

Form Number: N/A. Respondents: Individuals or households; Business or other for-profit entities.

Number of Respondents: 22,000. Estimated Time per Response: 0.083— 2 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement; Recordkeeping requirement; Annual reporting requirement; Third party disclosure requirement.

Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection is contained in Sections 1, 4, 224, 251, 303, 601, 623, 624 and 632 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

Total Annual Burden: 36,114 hours. Total Annual Cost: None. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s).

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for confidentiality with this collection of information.

Needs and Uses: In the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Congress directed the FCC to adopt rules governing the disposition of home wiring owned by a cable operator when a subscriber terminates service. The rules at 76.800 et seq., implement that directive. The intention of the rules is to clarify the status and provide for thedisposition of existing cable operatorowned wiring in single family homes