U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

23–873 PDF 2017

S. HRG. 114–640 

REDUCING THE FEDERAL TAX BURDEN 

FOR AMERICA’S SMALL BUSINESSES 

FIELD HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS 

AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

APRIL 2, 2015 

Printed for the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

(II) 

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

DAVID VITTER, Louisiana, Chairman 

BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland, Ranking Member 

JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho 

MARCO RUBIO, Florida 

RAND PAUL, Kentucky 

TIM SCOTT, South Carolina 

DEB FISCHER, Nebraska 

CORY GARDNER, Colorado 

JONI ERNST, Iowa 

KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire 

MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming 

MARIA CANTWELL, Washington 

JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire 

HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota 

EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts 

CORY A. BOOKER, New Jersey 

CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware 

MAZIE K. HIRONO, Hawaii 

GARY C. PETERS, Michigan 

ZAK BAIG, Republican Staff Director 

ANN JACOBS, Democratic Staff Director 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

(III) 

C O N T E N T S 

OPENING STATEMENTS

Page 

Vitter, Hon. David, Chairman, and a U.S. Senator from Louisiana ................... 1 

WITNESSES

Boustany, Hon. Charles, a U.S. Representative from Louisiana ......................... 6 

Shamsie, Sadie, President and Co-Founder, Licensed Title Insurance Agent, 

Standard Title, Lafayette, LA ............................................................................. 14 

Moring, Robert, Owner, Weld Done Design, Carencro, LA .................................. 15 

Hebert, Alan D., Partner, Thibodaux Hebert Deshotels Leblanc, L.L.C., Lafayette, LA ................................................................................................................. 20 

Feibus, Dan, Chief Executive Officer, Zagis USA, Lafayette, LA ........................ 25 

ALPHABETICAL LISTING

Boustany, Hon. Charles 

Opening statement ........................................................................................... 6 

Feibus, Dan 

Testimony .......................................................................................................... 25 

Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 27 

Hebert, Alan 

Testimony .......................................................................................................... 20 

Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 22 

Moring, Robert 

Testimony .......................................................................................................... 15 

Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 18 

Shamsie, Sadie 

Testimony .......................................................................................................... 14 

Vitter, Hon. David 

Opening statement ........................................................................................... 1 

Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 4 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

(1) 

REDUCING THE FEDERAL TAX BURDEN 

FOR AMERICA’S SMALL BUSINESSES 

THURSDAY, APRIL 2, 2015 

COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 

LAFAYETTE CITY HALL, 

Lafayette, LA. 

The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 8:00 a.m., at Lafayette City Hall, 705 West University Avenue, Hon. David Vitter, 

Chairman of the Committee, presiding. 

Present: Senator Vitter. 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. DAVID VITTER, CHAIRMAN, 

AND A U.S. SENATOR FROM LOUISIANA 

Chairman VITTER. Good morning, everyone. How’s everyone 

doing? Welcome, this is a combination Town Hall Meeting and 

Field Hearing by the Senate Small Business Committee. I’m really 

honored to be joined by Congressman Charles Boustany who is cohosting this event with me. We are honored to have you. 

Why don’t we get started in the right frame of mind, and right 

frame of heart, by standing for a prayer, and then please remain 

standing right after the prayer. We’ll have the Pledge of Allegiance 

to the Flag. But first, we’ll be led in prayer by the Reverend Blaine 

Peterson, of the Church of the Ascension. 

Reverend. 

Reverend PETERSON. Today is Maundy Thursday. This is the day 

that Jesus gave his followers a new commandment, a new perspective of the call to care for others, to serve others and yes to serve 

on behalf of others. The Apostle Paul writes: Let the same mind 

be in you that was in Christ Jesus, who though he was in the form 

of God, did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born 

in human likeness. And being found in human form, he humbled 

himself and became obedient to the point of death, even death on 

a cross. 

Let us pray: Lord make us instruments of your peace. Where 

there is hatred, let us sow love; where there is injury, pardon; 

where there is discord, union; where there is doubt, faith; where 

there is despair, hope; where there is darkness, light; where there 

is sadness, joy. Grant that we may not so much seek to be consoled 

as to console; to be understood as to understand; to be loved as to 

love; for it is in giving that we receive; it is in pardoning that we 

are pardoned, and it is in dying that we are born to eternal life. 

Amen. 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

2 

Chairman VITTER. Thank you so much, Reverend. Please remain 

standing for the Pledge of Allegiance. We will be led in the pledge 

by Norword Meche, Commander of the VFW Post 9822. 

Commander. 

Commander MECHE. I’m glad to be here. Would everybody remain standing, and face the flag and salute. I pledge allegiance to 

the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for 

which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty 

and justice for all. 

Chairman VITTER. Thank you Commander. Please be seated. We 

are also going to open our program today, since this is about small 

business, with the recognition of a small business here in Louisiana. One this I’m interested in as the new Chair of the Senate 

Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship is to recognize 

a vibrant, successful, leading small business every week, including 

with comments in the Congressional Record, and this week we are 

recognizing Jill Listi Dance Studio, from right here in Acadiana. 

Jill is with us, and I want to present her with this formal copy of 

the comments in the Congressional Record, and I’ll just read a 

paragraph of it: 

‘‘Listi’s Dance Studio is committed to providing opportunities in 

the arts to children and adults throughout Acadiana. The studio 

values the opportunity to introduce students to dance while instilling a firm foundation that promotes the respect and understanding 

for the art of dance.’’ 

Jill, congratulations, and I’ll be presenting this to you. Congratulations. 

[Applause]. 

Chairman VITTER. Thank you very much, Jill. Your business is 

a prime example of how small business is the heart and soul of our 

economy throughout the country, including right here in Acadiana, 

and that’s why we are meeting today in Lafayette, to talk about 

some important small business issues. 

Let me explain how the program will work. As I said, this is a 

combination Town Hall Meeting and we want to hear your comments and questions, and it’s also a Field Hearing of the Senate 

Small Business Committee featuring four key witnesses, and the 

broad theme is small business tax issues, the hurdles, the costs, 

the expense, the complication in our present tax system that’s a 

burden and a problem for small business. 

Now the meeting will proceed and in a minute I will turn it over 

to Charles for opening comments. After that, I’ll have a few on the 

topic of small business tax issues, with a very brief slide show myself, and then we’ll go into the Town Hall Meeting portion of the 

program. I want to hear from you, your comments and questions. 

If you haven’t already, we’re passing around a little form. Just use 

that to jot your comment or question, and give it to the staff, and 

we’ll get through absolutely as many of those as possible. Hopefully, most are on topic about these key small business issues. We’ll 

certainly take others off topic as well. 

And then, after we do that for roughly 30, 35 minutes, then we’ll 

proceed to the Field Hearing. Charles and I will introduce our four 

great witnesses, and each of them will testify about their challenges and experience with the Tax Code for about five minutes, 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

3 

and then following their testimony, we’ll have a conversation with 

them with comments and questions and interplay involving 

Charles and myself. So that’s how we will proceed. With that, let 

me thank again our co-host today, who has been a great leader in 

this area, and was really super in co-hosting this Town Hall Meeting and Field Hearing, Congressman Charles Boustany. 

[The prepared statement of Chairman Vitter follows:] 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

4 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 1 here 23873.001
5 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 2 here 23873.002
6 

OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. CHARLES BOUSTANY, A U.S. 

REPRESENTATIVE FROM LOUISIANA 

Representative BOUSTANY. Well, thank you David, and let me 

thank you for holding the hearing and the Town Hall Meeting, and 

I want to thank you for your leadership on the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee. It’s a very important committee because small businesses are the backbone of growth. They 

drive growth, they drive job creation, and so understanding the 

things that have an impact on small businesses is really critical, 

and obviously taxation is one of those, and let me just say, I serve 

of the Tax Writing Committee in Congress, the House Ways and 

Means Committee, where all tax revenue measures begin, according to the Constitution. 

We have been working for three years on tax reform with an eye 

towards what is the impact on startups and entrepreneurs and 

businesses, and recognizing the distinction between those kinds of 

businesses that we have in our community versus large corporations who are looking for a corporate rate reduction. If we get a corporate rate reduction, that’s great, it’s going to help our large companies, but it’s not going to help the entrepreneurs who are out 

there, and the small business owners who day in and day out 

throughout their toil of work, and try to make cash flow needs in 

their businesses, dealing with tight credit situations, and having 

the Government taking more and more of their money, so I think 

it’s really appropriate that we have this conversation as we approach tax day, recognizing that what’s happened under this current Administration, we’ve seen the highest tax rate go up to nearly 45% at the Federal level alone, and this is directly affecting 

small business owners here in Louisiana, and across our great 

country. 

Secondly, we also have the issue of the Estate Tax, the Death 

Tax, which really disproportionately hits small businesses and 

farmers around our area, and is something that we need to address. So I think this is a timely subject, and I’m really happy to 

be here with you. Again, David, thank you for your leadership in 

all this, and we want to hear questions from the audience, and 

then we’ll get into the Field Hearing. 

Chairman VITTER. Thanks Charles. A few opening comments of 

mine. I’m going to refer to this slide show, if we can go to the first 

slide. 

This makes the point. This is a Small Business Survey that was 

done by a leading small business group, and they asked a simple 

question. What’s the bigger problem, what’s the bigger burden, the 

check you have to write for taxes, or actually the administrative 

burden, the time and the expense of figuring it all out, doing the 

paperwork, complying with the law. Actually a majority of businesses said, it’s the administrative burden. I mean, they weren’t 

happy with the size of the check. Don’t get me wrong; but the time, 

the burden of figuring out an overly complicated system was actually an even greater burden, which is sort of amazing. 

Go to the next slide. This is what tax complexity has done over 

time. You know, in the early part of the last century, we started 

with a Tax Code that was about 400 pages long. It’s now 74,000 

pages long. That chart on the right basically shows the increase in 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

7 

the size of the Code. Just under the present Federal Administration, it’s grown 7,000 pages, 10%, just this one Administration, and 

that has led to that spike in the last several decades. That is just 

unacceptable. 

Next slide. This also is about the tax compliance burden. It’s 

based on the same survey as the first slide was based on; 40% of 

all small businesses say they spent over 80 hours a year on tax 

compliance. So two full work weeks, just figuring out the Tax Code, 

and then a quarter spent over 120 hours a year, so that’s a huge 

burden on small business. 

Next slide. Okay, this is the next. One in three businesses spend over $10,000 on compliance, just on the Federal side; that’s not 

even counting State and local. Over half spent more than $5,000. 

Again, huge burden. 

Next slide. Now Solutions. As chair of the Small Business Committee, I’ve been collecting a lot of ideas from small businesses 

about how we can make some significant improvements, and in the 

next several weeks, we’re going to be introducing a Small Business 

Tax Relief Bill that’s going to propose doing a bunch of these 

things. Now this isn’t overall tax reform. This isn’t everything we 

need to do to simply the Code, but it’s some key provisions, particularly for small businesses, and these are some of the main elements 

of it. I don’t want to get into the weeds, but for those of you in 

business, you know how important some of these things are. Extending Section 179 expensing; increasing the limit for cash basis 

accounting; increasing the minimum safe harbor threshold, et 

cetera. So look for that bill we’re going to be introducing soon in 

the Small Business Committee. 

Next slide. Is that it? Great. Okay, just to put a little but more 

meat on the bone, this overly complicated Tax Code we are talking 

about, we could describe it this way. Let me find it in my notes. 

It’s equivalent to over 50 King James Bibles. We are in Easter 

week, so pile up 50 Bibles; that’s the number of words, the length, 

the complexity of the Tax Code. It takes an average person to figure it out, and comply in small business, three 40-hour work 

weeks, cost an average small business in terms of compliance, not 

the tax check you write, but compliance, the cost of taking your 

family to Disney World. That’s all an enormous burden, particularly the smaller businesses. Now big corporations have full compliance departments; it’s still a burden on them. I’m not saying it’s 

not, but for a smaller business, those sorts of burdens can actually 

be crushing. So that’s what we are here to talk about today, including with you, including with our witnesses. 

With that, let’s go to your comments and questions. Charles and 

I will alternate, as I get to you, you can stand up and we can have 

a conversation about your concern. Where is Raymond Rosemuster? 

Mr. ROSEMUSTER. Right here. 

Chairman VITTER. Yes, sir. 

Mr. ROSEMUSTER. I used to be an inventor, and I’m working on 

a few patents right now. I have one that works. It’s old science, but 

before I, in other words, get a handfull of other interested people 

to either invest, you know, I want to check on this new Pacific 

Trade thing that’s going on. That doesn’t guarantee anything with 

intellectual property laws or copyrights or patents on such. In my 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

8 

past experience, I had U.S. Patents. They took the National Gazette in New Orleans, as a matter of record. I had Canadian patents. I also had Taiwan and South Korean patents, and you know, 

futuristically having a product made overseas at those markets. 

Now, there’s no security, because they read our mail. There was a 

time, 30 years ago, when I read the CFR 37, the Copyright and 

Trademark and all that, and patents, that you know, even though 

it may have taken a year or a year-and-a-half before they did a review to see if your concept was patentable, at least there was some 

security during that initial patent pending or the newness of it. 

You didn’t have to worry about confidentiality or secrecy or what 

they said proprietary. Now—— 

Chairman VITTER. Raymond, I don’t want to cut you off, but we 

want to get to—— 

Mr. ROSEMUSTER. But the problem is, first you file and there’s 

no security. The Chinese are reading our mail. You get on the computer, your personal file, you file with the patent office, and the 

Chinese are making it before you can even raise the capital and 

start the manufacturing process, so where does that leave the entrepreneur today? 

Chairman VITTER. Raymond, a huge business issue, particularly 

for innovator and entrepreneurs. But when patents and copyrights 

were recognized by the Founding Fathers as essential property 

rights. 

Mr. ROSEMUSTER. It is. 

Chairman VITTER. It is in the Constitution, so we need to protect 

that. Charles and I are working on several things that relate to 

that, and first of all there needs to be proper protection and reforms in the Patent Office. Secondly, you mention the Pacific Trade 

deal. 

Mr. ROSEMUSTER. Yes. 

Chairman VITTER. That’s not final yet, but when it is, and when 

we look at the details, certainly I’m going to concentrate on that 

sort of patent and copyright protection, because that is the perennial problem, particularly with countries like China and the Pacific 

Rim, and third, we’ve got to combat that sort of outright theft by 

countries like China. 

Mr. ROSEMUSTER. I do have a recommendation that might give 

us more security, like I say, for proprietary information, that if the 

Patent Office would just accept, say, overnight express packet with 

the disc, to file, and keep it in house, rather than out there in the 

public, you know, where the Chinese are reading our mail, and 

where it doesn’t give the entrepreneur an opportunity either raise 

capital, and I don’t want to get a handful of my acquaintances involved in any of business venture without my being confident, assured, there’d be some sort of protection. And I’ve [inaudible] about 

filing in Federal Court jurisdiction, where you would have clones 

or knock offs being made and done, and where I would do the research and investigation, but when you have paid—this is going 

back a quarter century, $300,400,000 within the Federal Court jurisdiction to get that clone or knock off off the market because it’s 

competing with your 60 or 100 employee business, it’s astounding 

how they would just pack up and move to different Federal Court 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

9 

jurisdiction, so you’re chasing, chasing, chasing during the life of 

the patent. It’s a very costly operation. 

Chairman VITTER. I hear you. Raymond, I don’t want to cut you 

off. We’ve got to get to other people, but let me give Charles a 

chance to respond as well. 

Mr. ROSEMUSTER. I speak to the Speaker, and I do want to keep 

up on this, because I don’t want to make a commitment for or have 

any of my associates make a commitment for any kind of operation 

for which there is no recourse. 

Chairman VITTER. Yes. I heard you. 

Representative BOUSTANY. Let me just briefly make a few comments. I’m one of the leaders of the House overseeing what’s happening with the TPP, the committee and jurisdiction that’s focused 

on it. One of the things we are intent upon is addressing these 

issues, but not just tariff barriers, but all these other issues dealing 

with cyber security, dealing with how some of these state-owned 

enterprises steal American patent secrets and trade secrets and 

use them to leapfrog or get a competitive advantage. We are all 

over this issue, and we’re going to—we’re focused on making sure 

that whatever the final agreement looks like, has to have very 

strong protections in it, and these ways of settling disputes that 

are fair to American business, otherwise we will not agree to this 

trade agreement. 

Chairman VITTER. As we go on to the next question, let me also 

mention, Raymond, there is proposed patent and copyright reform 

in Congress. I’m looking at that very carefully. Quite frankly, I 

have big concerns with the so-called comprehensive bill in the Senate, because I think it would be a setback in significant ways for 

inventors and innovators, including folks they work with, universities, et cetera; so I’m looking at that very hard. I’m on the relevant Committee judiciary, and I have real concerns with this socalled comprehensive bill. 

Charles, do you want to go to the next? 

Representative BOUSTANY. Yes, let’s go to Terrell Hebert. Terrell 

asks ‘‘do you see cost segregation as an asset for small businesses.’’ 

Why don’t you elaborate on your question? 

Mr. HEBERT. Cost segregation is a method of paying taxes on 

commercial property, and we know big business is always looking 

to spend money, because they are always, you know, adding, building new buildings, et cetera. Small business, my perception is that 

most small business people are going to build one building and 

that’s all they are going to be doing. Do you see cost segregation 

as being beneficial to a small business? 

Representative BOUSTANY. Well it could be. It depends on the 

small business, and what that business is engaged in. Part of what 

we want to do as we go through tax reform, is to take that deep 

dive and look at what the impact is on some of these tax provisions 

and how they work for small business. I can tell you that over the 

last three years, I remember being in meetings as we were looking 

at here’s current law, here’s some options, and there was this big 

discussion about whether to use accrual accounting and where to 

start accrual accounting versus, you know, cost accounting, and I 

was very unhappy with it because what was being proposed was 

going to actually affect a lot of small businesses here. Cash flow is 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

10 

king, as far as small business. If we don’t pay attention to that, 

we’re going to hurt a lot of people, so I think those are key issues. 

Making sure we understand the consequences of what we do in tax 

policy at the ground level is critical, because we will set up a Tax 

Code that has problems. So when you do tax reform, you know, you 

start up talking about fairness, simplicity, lower compliance burden, lower rates. That’s all fine and good; I think everybody would 

agree with that. The devil is in the details, and you’ve got to get 

a document out there with the real proposal to start a real conversation about it, and so I would welcome a whole lot more information on your perspective on this, and if you want to comment 

further on it, you know, please. 

Mr. HEBERT. Sure. My experience with cost segregation is it’s 

going to be beneficial on a case by case basis. Some people have 

different reasons for why they need that money up front. We never 

know what that’s going to be. That’s between them and their CPA. 

So, yeah, because as you mentioned, cash flow is critical for most 

businesses, we are finding that people who will take the opportunity to take a look at it and see, then when they have all the 

information in front of them, they’ll be able to determine yes, it’s 

beneficial, or maybe no, it’s not beneficial. We’re finding some 

CPAs have their own reasons why they don’t want to utilize it; 

they don’t always go into the details about it. But again, on a case 

by case basis, some companies need it, most companies need it because they need their money up front. 

Representative BOUSTANY. Yeah, I think the key, you hit one key 

point, and that is, we don’t want to generalize when we try to 

make tax policy. We need to look at the specifics and what’s actually happening. 

David, do you want to—— 

Chairman VITTER. Jeff Johnson is asking about Iran. Jeff, why 

don’t you elaborate? 

Mr. JOHNSON. Sir, I don’t have a question. I just have a statement. By signing the letter to the Ayatollah, you sir are a traitor, 

a disloyal, un-American traitor. That’s my statement. 

Chairman VITTER. Well, I appreciate your right to free speech. I 

wish you would appreciate my right to free speech, because what 

I did is sent a letter to certain folks in Iran, co-signed by 46 other 

U.S. Senators, simply stating a fact, and the fact is that is they 

reach a deal with President Obama, and that deal isn’t certified or 

passed off on or acted upon in some way by the U.S. Congress, it 

is just that, a deal with President Obama. And it doesn’t have longstanding stature beyond President Obama, so that’s what I did. So 

I wrote a letter, 46 other Senators, and I stated a fact. Now, I think 

the substance of the matter is, what is the deal being negotiated? 

I’m really concerned that this Administration wants a deal at all 

costs, and whenever you want a deal at all costs, whether it’s negotiated with Iran or doing a business deal, you usually get a really 

bad deal. We can’t afford to enter into a really bad deal with a 

power like Iran’s extreme leaders clearly bent on the destruction of 

the West, the United States, Israel and others, who are working 

hard for nuclear weapons, so that’s the substance of the matter 

that I’m very concerned about, and I hope we don’t rush into that 

sort of bad deal. 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

11 

[Applause]. 

Charles. 

Representative BOUSTANY. No, I would just add that any deal 

with Iran is going to impact sanctions that were imposed by Congress. That means Congress made that law saying it is the law of 

the United States to impose these sanctions on Iran by our country. 

Congress is the only entity that can reverse those sanctions, and 

so we have to have a full say in what happens in all this at the 

end of the day. I personally am very skeptical that we’ll get to a 

deal with Iran based on all the reading and studying and briefings 

I’ve had on this. It’s in the late stage; it doesn’t look good, but I 

will not sit back and be quiet if the Administration tries to push 

forward a deal that will hurt U.S. interests in the long run. I’m 

very adamant about this. This is a critical massive security issue, 

but anything that the Administration decides to do, to accommodate Iran, will involve sanctions law and U.S., which is something 

we would have to reverse or change, and so that’s another reason 

why Congress has to be involved in this over and above, in addition 

to the elements that Senator Vitter has laid out. 

Chairman VITTER. Charles, do you want to go to the next? Are 

there any more questions? We have one here. I can’t quite make 

out the name, is it Mel Keatings? 

Mr. KEATINGS. Mike. 

Chairman VITTER. ‘‘Is Congress going to’’—I want you to elaborate. I can’t make out your handwriting. Are you a doctor? No offense. 

Mr. KEATINGS. No offense taken. The big thing for me is in small 

business dealings and so forth, I do a little business with Columbia 

and so forth. I’m returned from National Oilwell/Varco. So, I do 

dabble still in the oilfield, and so forth like that, but my big question is, is there anything on the horizon or changes coming up in 

the IRS or is there a possibility that we’re going to go to a flat tax? 

Chairman VITTER. Well, Congress is seriously considering tax reform. Now a few minutes ago, I outlined the focus of the Small 

Business Tax Bill that I’m working on. That’s very specific provisions that are important for small business, but on a broader level, 

and Charles is very involved in this, because he’s on the relevant 

House Committee, on a broader level there’s a big discussion of 

much more fundamental tax reform, and obviously a flat tax or 

something close to that is a version of that where we tremendously 

simplify the Code to lower those compliance costs that I was talking about in the slide show. 

Mr. KEATINGS. I have one more question for the Congressman. 

Congressman, since you’re on the Tax Committee and so forth, do 

y’all ever, or your staff, ever review the bureaucrat’s writings and 

laws and things like that. Do y’all ever pull it up and say, wait a 

minute, this doesn’t make sense to the average guy out on the 

street? 

Representative BOUSTANY. Oh, yeah. 

Mr. KEATINGS. Because I know in my dealings, and every time 

I have people come in from Columbia or vice versa, it’s a horrendous amount of paperwork. Nothing sticks from yesterday. It’s always do it, re-do it, and I go guys, don’t y’all have something on 

file, and they go yeah, but this is a new deal. You know, so I mean, 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

12 

maybe these large corporations can handle this, but a small individual person cannot. I think this is a horrendous thing that these 

bureaucrats sit back and write the laws and everything else and 

it seems like there’s no review on it. And then the other thing that 

I would like to bring up to both of y’all is that these billions of dollars that we spend on educational programs that never change 

things. Go all the way back to Jimmy Carter, and they’re still sitting there monitoring the classroom but they’re paying them, and 

you know this waste has to stop. The businessman is paying for 

this waste. If we did that in our businesses, or in our [inaudible], 

we wouldn’t exist, and you wouldn’t be necessary, because this 

country wouldn’t be what it is for the individual taxpayer. So, I’m 

asking how close are y’all or are the Democrats aboard on making 

these changes; are any of them privy to the idea that there has to 

be some changes made? 

Representative BOUSTANY. If I could address that and make a 

few points. First of all, with regard to what the IRS is doing, we 

are doing a number of things to truly try to hold them accountable. 

I spent the last four years chairing the Oversight Subcommittee on 

the Tax Writing Committee, really pounding them about a number 

of issues. We have gotten them changed in a few instances, and 

some they are resistant and we are still in that fight. I have a tax 

legislative assistant, plus some staff on our committee that review 

every single regulation that comes out, and we question them, they 

send letters, we call, we work with them for clarification. 

I think the latest case in point, we had Secretary Lew, the Treasury Secretary, in front of our Committee a few weeks ago, and they 

took this ObamaCare tax provision pertaining to health reimbursement accounts for small businesses, and imposed these monumental penalties on small businesses if they tried to use these, and 

I pointed this out to the Secretary. I said this is completely and 

grossly unfair. You’re giving unfair advantage to labor unions, to 

large corporations at the expense of small business, and he looked 

baffled by it. He turned to one of his technical assistants or advisors who then whispered back to him that I was right. And he said, 

we’re looking at this, and a week later they made a change and 

they put the whole thing on hold for six months as a result of my 

question. I have now introduced legislation to get rid of that program, because it’s faulty, and it’s wrong, and it’s very prejudicial 

towards small business. 

The second point I want to make is just more broadly on tax reform. We’ve been working very hard on the Ways and Means Committee in the House. We’ve actually formulated a complete re-write 

of the Tax Code in draft form. There are a number of problems 

with it, and we are still working on it. Under Paul Ryan’s leadership, who chairs the Committee, and I chair one of the subcommittees, we are really focused on this to do a number of things. To 

eliminate all—you know, get rid of the seven tax brackets for individuals and go to two, simplify; 25 and 10, combine a bunch of 

things. For instance, things like raising the Standard Deductions 

significantly so that you have fewer people having to itemize all 

this complexity. A simpler form for filing. Taking all the education 

tax credits that are out there, and combining them down to three. 

A lot of simplification. We are not finished with it. We want to get 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

13 

the simplicity, flatness, we want to lower rates, and we want to 

make this Tax Code fair and easy to navigate to really markedly 

lower your compliance costs. The more we have gotten into it, the 

more I realize this is pretty complex, because you don’t want to create unintended consequences, you know, by just generalizing as I 

said earlier. You’ve got to really look at the specifics and the interaction of all of this, so technically we are getting closer to having 

something that we will finalize, and our goal would be to have it 

completed. We don’t think we’d get anywhere with this current administration on it, but we’ll tee it up for our Republican nominee, 

and hopefully they can run with a real tax plan. 

Chairman VITTER. Great. Let’s drop up with one more question 

again from Raymond Rosemuster, asking about the national debt, 

18 trillion dollars. This is a dire condition. Raymond, I agree. I 

carry around something with me in my wallet that illustrates how 

big a problem this can get to when you have debt and economic policy out of control. This is a note that was, when it was printed, a 

real note in Zimbabwe. It’s their 100 trillion dollar note. This was 

real when it was printed. It’s not worth anything anymore—100 

trillion dollars. Now, what led to this is out of control economic policy that didn’t make sense, including printing money, including 

spending beyond your means. What’s interesting about these 100 

trillion dollar notes, about four years before, you know what the exchange rate between Zimbabwe and the U.S. dollar was? One to 

one. It can happen pretty quickly when you have out of control economic policy. That’s why we are trying to address that, including 

with a real budget. 

Just in the last few weeks, both the House and the Senate debated and passed a budget that actually balances at some point in 

the future, in contrast to President Obama’s submitted budget 

which raises taxes, raises spending, raises borrowing, and never 

balances. It’s not a question of when. It’s not a question of it takes 

too long, it never ever, ever balances. 

Mr. ROSEMUSTER. Well, let’s start, it looks dire to me, that if you 

look at the report that we have like 8,000 tons of gold, and the 

present value of gold, we’re only placing it at about 40 trillion dollars. So if we look at the economy as far as what they call velocity 

within the economy to achieve that, and if you look at the debt, you 

know, okay, it might be just about even, 40 trillion, that’s the gold 

price right now. But, if you consider other avenues for other ventures where, say like factory costs, two or three percent of factory 

transactions, say like on credit cards, two or three percent on a trillion dollars is 20, 30 million dollars, and then if you look at the 

interest on it, on say, credit cards, you have 200 million dollars a 

year. And then you see what’s happening is that you see tax loopholes, but what is happening with say, a quarter trillion dollars a 

year with factory costs or interest? 

Chairman VITTER. Raymond, again, I don’t want to cut you off, 

but we do want to go to the Field Hearing portion of our program. 

That’s what we are going to do right now. So let me begin to introduce our witnesses. 

We have four great small business witnesses today. We’re going 

to introduce each one in turn, and they are going to talk about 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

14 

their personal experience in small business, particularly on tax 

issues and tax burdens for about five minutes each. 

First is Sadie Shamsie. Sadie is the co-owner, the President of 

Standard Title. That’s been in business since September 2001, with 

their main office here in Lafayette, and now a second office in Lake 

Charles. Standard Title provides title research, examination, title 

insurance and escrow services for commercial and residential real 

estate transactions, and presently has nine employees. Sadie and 

Standard Title are affiliated with the Louisiana Land Title Association, and other realty and other associations. Sadie, thanks for joining us. 

SADIE SHAMSIE, PRESIDENT AND CO-FOUNDER, LICENSED 

TITLE INSURANCE AGENT, STANDARD TITLE, LAFAYETTE, LA 

Ms. SHAMSIE. Thank you, Senator. First, I’d like to thank both 

Congressman Boustany and Senator Vitter for inviting me here to 

testify this morning. I truly have a small business. We have nine 

employees, and undoubtedly the most pressing problem we have is 

dealing with the complexity of the Internal Revenue Service, the 

code, the constant change in laws. Because of this, we have to hire 

a CPA firm that takes care of all our tax issues. I did the calculations this week, and the amount of money I spend paying my accounting firm, I could actually hire one full-time employee. 

Solutions to that? One of the things, I think, if we could simplify 

things, and that’s what y’all were talking about. A single tax rate 

schedule for all business income. Reducing the tax burden on small 

businesses will allow us to reinvest in our company, hire new people. I think a lot of people fail to realize, I have an S–Corp, so I 

pay individual income taxes. Well, when President Obama increased my personal taxes, it was a tax increase on my business 

and did affect my business in a negative way. If we want to promote economic growth and fairness between large and small businesses, it needs to be a fair playing ground. It obviously isn’t. I 

mean, big corporations have the ability to hire attorneys and accounting firms, and for us it’s just an enormous expense that quite 

frankly we really can’t afford. 

Another problem is the continual changes and temporary nature 

of many of the credited deductions. The example is Section 179. I 

mean, gee whiz. It almost feels like we are being held hostage by 

a bunch of lunatics every year. 

Chairman VITTER. It’s only because you are. 

Ms. SHAMSIE. I mean, it’s like, you know, do we do, well we don’t 

know. They might extend it, they might not extend it. I mean, you 

can’t run a business that way. I don’t even pretend that I understand the tax laws and the compliance issues; just quite frankly, 

I don’t. I mean, sometimes I wonder if my CPA firm even does. An 

example of that is, these are letters from the IRS. They always 

happen the same. I get a letter in, it says, we realize you owe more 

taxes. And then the next letter I get is saying that they received 

my correspondence, and they are looking at it, but it will take 40 

to 60 days to respond, and then eventually, I get a letter in that 

says, I actually got one in that said, oh sorry. We owe you a refund. 

The IRS deals this, I think a lot of us as taxpayers and small 

business owners, it’s almost like when you get that letter back, 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

15 

says you don’t owe anything, it’s like whew, thank goodness. But, 

if I make a mistake on my tax returns, if I sign that, I’m saying 

that everything in there is correct, I am held accountable for that, 

and if I make a mistake, guess what? There’s a penalty that I have 

to pay. 

The IRS is not held accountable for that, are they? Because even 

when this, and I have to hire my CPA firm to deal with this, I may 

not have to pay the taxes I didn’t owe to start with, but I have to 

pay my CPA firm to take care of this. I would love to see maybe 

if we could get a tax credit when the IRS screws up, and hold them 

accountable, hold their employees accountable, because it seems to 

really, really not be the case at all. 

Chairman VITTER. Absolutely. Thank you very much, Sadie. 

Great testimony. Next, we’re going to hear from Robert Moring. 

Robert and his son, Joshua, are owners of Weld Done Design, 

which manufactures and services residential metal and copper door 

and window awnings, as well as commercial storefront awnings. 

They are just north of Carencro, been in business since 2006, serving all of Acadiana and also serving the South Louisiana area from 

New Orleans to the Texas line. They are an accredited member of 

the Better Business Bureau, of the Carencro Business Association, 

State Police Association, and the Louisiana Sheriff’s Association 

Support Group. Robert, welcome. 

ROBERT MORING, OWNER, WELD DONE DESIGN, 

CARENCRO, LA 

Mr. MORING. Thank you, Congressman, Senator. Thank you for 

welcoming my testimony here. The Senate Committee on Small 

Business and Entrepreneurship focuses on the Federal tax burden 

on America’s small businesses. When I say I have a small business, 

I have a rather small business, and just like Ms. Shamsie was saying, I think the biggest burden here is the expenses that us small 

business people have to incur with our CPAs as a result of the IRS 

complexity. I’d like to share my thoughts and opinions on what I 

feel are key areas of concern. The area of concern that I’d like to 

address is the complexity of the IRS Tax Code, Social Security, tax 

legislation, and the future of our small businesses. 

My primary concern is the complexity of the IRS Tax Code. The 

Tax Code for small businesses is very complex and makes it difficult for me to handle the administrative part, like I was saying, 

so we have to outsource that to a CPA. CPAs charge a lot, they 

really do. Maybe I should become a CPA. It takes time for me to 

prepare my documents. When I first went in business, my CPA was 

doing everything for me, and I learned real quickly that I could 

hire two more people if I would just lower that cost. I figured it 

out; I can’t lower that cost. I managed to get it minimized as much 

as I could. I file as much as I can, I try to handle as many forms 

as I can, but you know, the fear of the IRS comes into play. The 

IRS, we’ve all watched the movies with the mobs, and if they don’t 

get them on the murder charge, they’re going to get them on the 

tax evasion part. So, it’s true, and you know, like Ms. Shamsie was 

saying, when I get to the mailbox and I see a letter from the IRS, 

I don’t even make it back to my office, because you know it’s not 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

16 

good. It’s negative, so the connotation of the IRS is bitter in a small 

business person’s mind, it really is. 

Personally, I worked for my competitor at one time, and he got 

in trouble with the IRS, and this is a true story. His brother was 

working with him, and he wasn’t even at—his brother was working 

at a different business, and because he was limited, he was listed 

on the LLC as a corporation, he was liable for that tax burden as 

well. The penalties and interest went well over a million dollars for 

that very small business. It was crushing; it was crushing. 

I feel the average small business owner has a great burden of research and to try to untangle the Tax Code for just a simple purpose to operate its software. The cost of the software is very expensive in itself, and the updates and the upgrades and to do the payroll modules, that’s to be able to handle what we can do that we 

don’t want our CPAs to bill us for. The IRS has a threatening presence. You know, it’s pretty fearful that you might accidentally miss 

a deadline or file the wrong form, send it to the wrong address, 

didn’t file it on line correctly. It gets complicated, and I’m talking 

specifically just of Federal tax, but it’s all taxes that we have to 

deal with, but the Federal gets a little precarious at times, especially if the EFTPS website is down. You know, we have to make 

our monthly deposits, [inaudible] quarterly files, whereas it just 

gets confusing. I feel that a separate Tax Code and lower tax rates 

would help me expand my business, bottom line. 

Another one of my great concerns is the Social Security matters. 

When we talk about Federal taxes, I don’t know if the—I don’t hear 

much about Social Security. Social Security is probably one of the 

largest concerns for us, for me and my son, and for our business 

and for most families. You know, where are these monies going, 

and will it be available for me and my employees when it comes 

time for us to be able to collect what we contributed. As a business 

owner, I’m responsible for matching that contribution and sending 

it in. I can tell you personally, my Social Security tax with matching contribution is three times what my Federal tax is. That’s 

crushing to a small business, thus creating a strain on the system. 

You know, we hear this, about the Social Security system, there’s 

a strain, there’s going to be a collapse or a downfall. What I would 

like to see better communications and answers given to the Social 

Security questions from the Legislature and from the IRS and the 

Social Security Administration. We hear nothing but the negative. 

It’s kind of like the taxes. So the Social Security Administration is 

now becoming one of those evil doers as well, you know. 

I feel the complex tax laws are not all the fault of the IRS alone, 

but legislation as well. With laws constantly changing, it’s very difficult for the small business owner like myself to make and follow 

a plan and make an important decision, like the ones, the Section 

179. Absolutely crazy. The bonus depreciation was a law that was 

designed to stimulate the economy, and was put into place for several years; however, in 2014 small business owners were told not 

to rely on that bonus depreciation any longer, so we planned accordingly. We planned our expenses, our fixed assets. For some reason, that I’ve yet to understand, the legislation was passed in December as an economic stimulus. It was supposed to help small 

business owners that was no help whatsoever. It’s like having a toy 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

17 

and you can’t take it out until December, and when you take it out 

in December, they say oh, you could have played with it all year 

long! It just doesn’t make any sense. 

My final thought and concern is about the future of our small 

business. My son is an important contributor to my business. It’s 

just me and my wife and my son who have any dealings with this 

business. My son has a great a great entrepreneurial spirit. He has 

great dreams of expanding our business every day. In fact we’re 

putting a new building up today that I had to fork out of my pocket 

to do. At the same time, he sees the daily struggles and the efforts 

it takes to operate a business, and I’m fortunate that he has a positive attitude and a drive to succeed. I also realize that he is rare. 

I have met several young would-be entrepreneurs that have decided to just give up the dream of owning their own business with 

the difficulty of building and managing a business primarily when 

they see what the involvement is with the taxes, the Federal tax, 

State tax, school board and what have you. We need to see—will 

we continue to see the American entrepreneurial spirit in the next 

generation? It’s a great concern of mine, not just my son but for 

my grandson. 

Again, I thank you for allowing me to voice my thoughts and 

opinions in this Field Hearing, and I hope that my small contribution might plant a seed that Americans who operate small businesses will benefit and thrive through the efforts of this Senate 

Committee. Thank you. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Moring follows:] 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

18 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 3 here 23873.003
19 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 4 here 23873.004
20 

Chairman VITTER. Thank you very much, Robert. 

Representative BOUSTANY. David, next we’ll hear from Mr. Alan 

Hebert. Alan is a partner in a well-established accounting firm 

here in town, Thibodeaux, Hebert, Deshotels and LeBlanc, LLC. In 

addition to being a very accomplished accountant, Alan has been 

very involved in business consulting, is an owner in several small 

business ventures in a wide range of areas. I think Alan, with your 

background, you bring a very unique perspective to this debate and 

discussion from an accounting and a small business perspective, so 

Alan, by all means, let’s hear your testimony. 

ALAN D. HEBERT, PARTNER, THIBODAUX HEBERT DESHOTELS 

LEBLANC, L.L.C., LAFAYETTE, LA 

Mr. HEBERT. Sure. Congressman Boustany, Senator Vitter, 

thanks for inviting me today to address this hearing. I’ve heard 

some of the earlier testimony, and as a CPA I share the concerns 

because I deal with those things every day, you know, on their behalf, in addition, to some of the businesses that I own, and I understand the problems. During my 37 years as a CPA and a business 

consultant, I spent countless hours listening to and addressing 

business concerns with clients. As a small business owner, I have 

experienced the issues first hand and through the entities that I 

own covering a wide spectrum from oil field services to rice milling. 

Small business more than ever must rely on professionals such 

as myself to meet the heavy burden presented by the complexity 

of our tax laws and the related compliance requirements. Many 

times, when they should be focused on running their business to 

the best of their ability, they are focused on tax and compliance 

issues and end up making decisions that they would not make otherwise. The days of my grandfather who had a auto parts store 

where he and my uncle and father worked, he prepared every form 

himself with a Number 2 pencil. Those days are gone. 

Just to illustrate, and you’ve heard about Section 179. Various 

methods can be used just to deduct the cost of an asset as one example of the multi-layered web of rules that the average small 

business owner has trouble understanding. The business owner 

must decide whether to use IRS Code 179 expensing, bonus depreciation, regular depreciation, and if that wasn’t enough, in 2013, 

the Minimis Safe Harbor Rules were passed that govern the immediate write-off of small assets. Most small businesses can only 

write-off assets under $500. This limit is way too small, and requires additional compliance time recording these assets on the depreciation schedule, deciding which of all these expensing options 

are available, and then tracking them for years to come. Additionally to comply, taxpayers are required to file and adopt a capitalization policy, and make an election every year going forward. Extenders, you’ve heard about the 179 and bonus depreciation. Extenders are great but tax law needs to be permanent. Until Congress decides that there needs to be a change, all these extenders 

drive business people crazy, and they cannot plan. 

There has been much discussion lately about corporate tax reform. While there is much room for improvement in that arena, I 

don’t think a change in corporate rates will affect many small businesses as the vast majority pass through entities bounding as partLAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

21 

nerships, S–Corporations, disregarded entities which pass through 

the income to the owner’s individual tax return. It would be helpful 

to the small business owners to simplify the rules regarding income 

and deductions at the company level. The tax burden will only be 

affected if rates were changed at the individual level. Compliance 

and related penalties create a daunting task for any business 

owner navigating the complex and ever increasing matrix of deadlines or quarter income tax estimates, income tax returns, payroll 

tax reports, and payroll tax deposits, not to mention all of the local 

sales tax and the local requirements. 

Penalties are assessed by the IRS when the computerized system 

detects an error before asking the taxpayer for additional information to clarify discrepancies. The long and expensive task of proving 

that information was reported correctly begins. Of course, it’s nearly impossible to contact anyone by phone and correspondence is not 

answered for 90 days, so notices cross in the mail. I have on multiple occasions corresponded with the IRS for years without resolution while the taxpayer continues to receive penalty notices and 

threatened seizure of assets and liens on bank accounts. 

In summary, my testimony only covers a few areas of the tax 

law. It does not even venture into the bizarre areas of alternative 

minimum tax, tax credits, limits on capital losses, and of course 

corporate requirements to report according to ObamaCare now. The 

small business owner who has taken risk with the opportunity to 

own their business, provide jobs for others, and purchase the goods 

of fellow entrepreneurs who are providing jobs usually does not realize that in addition to worrying about payroll, rent and mortgages, they now must face the task of worrying about complex tax 

laws and regulations. Every business owner understands their activity must be reported and taxes must be paid, paid to fund government services, but bad for a simple and fair system of taxation 

in compliance. Thank you. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Hebert follows:] 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

22 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 5 here 23873.005
23 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 6 here 23873.006
24 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 7 here 23873.007
25 

Chairman VITTER. Thank you. 

Representative BOUSTANY. Next we will have Mr. Dan Feibus. 

Dan is a newcomer to Louisiana. He’s the Chief Executive Officer 

of Zagis, USA. Dan’s business is something new in Jeff Davis Parish, and what he’s done is brought diversification to that area. 

They buy cotton. They fabricate it and manufacture it into yarn, 

and sell about 80% of it overseas, so it’s a new type of business. 

What, 80 jobs now, Dan? So we welcome. We look forward to you 

testifying. 

DAN FEIBUS, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZAGIS USA, 

LAFAYETTE, LA 

Mr. FEIBUS. Thank you Senator Vitter. Thank you Congressman 

Boustany. A little but about our company. It’s called Zagis, USA 

which is a partnership between myself and some former textile executives that they grew the Zagis Group out of Mexico. Our customers are large brands like Hanes or Fruit of the Loom that you 

are probably familiar with. We commissioned our plant in 2009, 

and since its opening, we have almost doubled our production investing somewhere in the neighborhood of 30 million dollars in 

CAPEX and construction. We employ about 80 full-time hourly associates in addition to our operations management team. There are 

only three people in the company who are transplants on the Carolinas, and two of those are competent of the third. We export over 

80% of what we manufacture, and we purchase all of our raw material which is cotton in bail form through the Mid-South region. 

We are the largest customer of our electrical co-op, Jeff Davis CoOp. We use approximately five megs of power, and we are a proud 

member of our local community. 

I am very grateful to the Committee for inviting me here today 

to share with you some of the impact of Federal taxation regulation, on the growth and health of our business and businesses that 

we interact with. In general, I strongly believe in tax reform that 

will lower corporate and individual tax rates substantially, and 

that will diminish the effects of the differential rates, earned income and unearned income, and capital gains. I believe there is a 

simpler and more transparent approach to taxation that will minimize compliance costs, and get businesses focused on investing and 

growing business, as opposed to developing tax compliance and 

minimization strategies. I also believe that our tax policies should 

be more neutral, instead of trying to pick winners and losers to the 

tax code. I think that we all win with taxes that are lower and require less compliance. 

In regards to the industry that I am part of, the impact of trade 

legislation before the Congress and President, the TPP, will be felt 

for a long time to come. This is something that we need to get right 

as a country, because often in the past my industry has been 

viewed as having had its best year or something that is no longer 

an area where we have a competitive advantage. This could not be 

farther from the truth. Our industry as a whole employs over 

400,000 full-time employees in the United States, with their numbers growing. The productivity gains in the industry that I am a 

part of have been nothing short of remarkable. We could make 

more pounds in less space with fewer people who are better paid 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

26 

than ever before. As an industry, we are in the process of a major 

re-investment with new entrant coming into the market and hundreds of millions of dollars of new plant equipment being added in 

the last year alone. These facilities add value to rural communities, 

stabilize the power grid, and add value to our planters of cotton 

and growers. Every pound of cotton that we grow here is one less 

pound that requires government assistance and [inaudible] of GSM 

export support and results in better margins for our farmers and 

better opportunities for our rural communities. I would strongly encourage the Committee to take into account the impact of taxation 

and regulatory policy on our industry, specifically as mentioned tax 

reforms with lower rates will make compliance earlier, customs reforms to modernize and streamline the system which is antiquated 

and has been just really a mess. Continue support for programs 

like new market tax credits and ED5 with a view to having them 

be more effective as a support to permanent manufacturing and job 

creation as opposed to safe harbor real estate investments and 

achieving a TPP agreement that does not penalize my industry. An 

awareness to government mandates, and particularly when they 

are in effect hidden, taxation has an impact on all of us as citizens, 

business owners and participants in this economy. 

I would also like to take this opportunity to point out to the Committee how important the USDA B&I Guaranteed Loan Program 

has been to our startup business and how it impacts rural communities that they can reach for economic growth. This program allows local banks to provide credit support necessary for businesses 

located and expanding in their communities. This program as well 

as the great work done by the SBA, especially on Export Finance, 

allow the world of small businesses to compete globally. At Zagis, 

we were fortunate to be able to secure USDA B&I loan when we 

started out, and it was extremely helpful in getting it [inaudible]. 

I am very grateful for this opportunity, and I thank you both for 

inviting me. 

[The prepared statement of Mr. Feibus follows:] 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

27 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 8 here 23873.008
28 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER


Insert offset folio 9 here 23873.009
29 

Chairman VITTER. Thank you very much, Dan. Now we are going 

to go into a discussion, questions and answers, to explore some of 

these points further. In starting, let me say as I mentioned toward 

the beginning, we are working on a focused Small Business Tax 

Bill, and I really encourage and appreciate all of y’all specific suggestions about that. We do raise that, the Minimis number, which 

is way, way too low. I think it’s $500 which you mentioned, to 

$2,500 for small business. We also mandate to the IRS, once we 

pass this, you got to come back to us within a certain period of time 

with specific proposals to dramatically reduce small business compliance cost, and have a number attached to each proposal so it’s 

real, and it really does that, and we are going to mandate that 

there can be panels with small business representatives to actually 

impact, to access the impact, particularly of their proposed regulations. 

Let me ask, Sadie certainly made the point that a lot of small 

businesses are pass-throughs, right? They are not corporations, so 

you are paying the individual rate. I just want to note, we hear a 

lot in national debate about the rich need to pay more, the top rate 

needs to be higher. I mean, that is basically the small business 

rate, for the most part. So a lot of the small businesses, because 

of the size of their operations, are paying the top individual rate. 

It doesn’t mean the owners are ultra-wealthy, but that is the small 

business rate. I just want to ask for y’all’s reaction to that, and so 

that the impact of that, when we have any of these debates that 

are often on the left of us on increasing substantially the top rate. 

Anybody want to react? 

Mr. FEIBUS. It always seems to me that it’s crazy that you have 

a completely different tax system for the LLC as opposed to just 

fixing the corporate tax or having the tax rates that applicable to 

everyone. It’s a deep threat. I mean, if you look at it, you know, 

we’re involved and we did a new market tax credit deal a while 

back, and basically those are credits that allow—it’s a really complicated system, but the buyers of those credits tend to be large 

banks, like J.P. Morgan or General Electric, and the idea that the 

large corporations have a tax rate that they are able to effectively 

pay a lower rate because of the way the system is so complicated, 

is bizarre. It’s just crazy. It should be transparent and understandable. 

Chairman VITTER. Yes. Anybody else? 

Mr. HEBERT. I’d just like to say, you mentioned a lot about the 

pass-through entity so it doesn’t—it is affected at the individual 

level, and not only just income tax, but then what people don’t realize is the self-employed person is the employment tax, which is Social Security, Medicare, now ObamaCare, on top of income tax. I’ve 

hear a lot, you know, in the news about the rich getting richer. 

What I’ve seen over my 37 years is there used to be corporations 

and there were individuals. With the tax law changes, there are 

been a lot of flow through entities, so I think it’s a misguided number that they’re looking at individual returns and thinking people 

are getting wealthier and what actually is happening is they are 

reporting the income of their business on their personal tax return. 

They are no longer two separate entities. So I think it is a very 

misguided look at it. The other thing people don’t realize is, income 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

30 

does not equal cash flow. So if you have—you make a million dollars and it flows through your personal return, that does not mean 

that you got a million dollars. It means the business had a net income of a million. They could have given you two hundred thousand dollars of cash to pay taxes, and used the rest to buy assets. 

So for those that don’t prepare returns and don’t understand that 

system, income reported has nothing to do with cash flow. 

Chairman VITTER. And Alan, related to this broad issue, let me 

ask you this. There is some discussion in Congress about perhaps 

doing a more focused tax reform bill on the corporate side, corporate tax reform, lowering corporate rates because our top corporate rate is way out of kilter with the rest of the world. It’s a 

competition issue. I have a big concern about that because of this 

thing we’re talking about here, leaving our small business, you’re 

increasing this disparity. If a focused corporate tax reform bill were 

done, which I have misgivings about, would there be a simple way 

to make sure that flow through income is also treated at that rate? 

Mr. HEBERT. Well, I think you could do it, but it may be a little 

complex because now you have to treat that income differently. 

Just like capital gains is treated differently than earned income. 

Now you have a—— 

Chairman VITTER. So you could do it, but it’s another complication. 

Mr. HEBERT. Right. I would say in Acadiana there are very few 

businesses of any size that are still C–Corporations paying tax, and 

all that came about when the law was changed 20 or 30 years ago 

to where you’d get double-taxed if you sell the assets of your company. When that happened, that change was made, that if you 

have a C–Corporation, and you pay double taxation if you sell your 

company, everyone immediately went to flow through entities, and 

so the corporate tax rate in 90% of the businesses in this area have 

no impact. 

Chairman VITTER. Okay. 

Charles. 

Representative BOUSTANY. David, this is really good testimony 

because it’s right at the heart of what we need to do with tax reform. There’s been a lot of talk in Washington about corporate tax 

reform as David said, because we currently have the highest corporate tax rate in the world, but yet many of these big corporations 

have tax planning offices that actually lower their effective tax rate 

to a significantly lower level than that 35%, whereas small businesses don’t have a whole lot of options. 

All of you have done a really good job of pointing out the problems with the uncertainty related to temporary tax measures, and 

the complexity of compliance and costs that you bear. I want to tell 

you, I’ve heard you, and I know a number of us on the Ways and 

Means Committee in the House have heard the cry from small 

business about the uncertainty. In fact, we were very close in December to having an agreement to make Section 179 expensing permanent, bonus depreciation permanent, and a number of other 

small business tax related items permanent to give you that kind 

of relief. It fell through at the end of the year. The Administration 

put up opposition and we were not able to get it done. In fact, one 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

31 

of the rare times the Senate Majority Leader at the time, Harry 

Reid, agreed, was with us on this, and the President intervened. 

We’ve started early this year. We’ve already passed legislation in 

Committee to move it forward to the House floor to make those 

items permanent. Let me ask you this, since there’s a lot of talk 

about corporate tax reform in Washington, if we were to sort of 

take Senator Vitter’s lead on this, and we did something with corporate tax reform but also brought into it, making a number of 

these items permanent, does that give adequate relief? Frankly, I’d 

like to do the whole shooting match, where we get parity with the 

players, bring the corporate rate down, maybe in the mid-20s, but 

also flatten the Code on the individual side, with maybe two rates, 

25 and 10. Simplify and do a lot of these things that we talked 

about earlier. Do you think, I mean, as a temporary measure, trying to get to full tax reform, is it sufficient to do a corporate tax 

rate reduction plus add in making permanent 179 expensing, allow 

for more cash full accounting, many of the things Senator Vitter 

has laid out, cost depreciation and make that permanent? Any of 

you want to comment on that? 

Mr. HEBERT. Let me just say, you know, anything you could 

make permanent, to me if it’s important, make it permanent. You 

could, you know, it doesn’t mean it’s permanent; it means it’s permanent until you change it again. These extenders for one or two 

years just drive people crazy. With regard to changing the corporate rate, like I said, that won’t affect 90% of the corporations 

in this area. I’m sure it’s really for large corporations, and with regard to different tax rates at the corporate level and individual, 

people make—they don’t just sit still. They make decisions about 

the differential in the rate, so you have to be very careful and have 

different rates for corporations and individuals because there could 

be a substantial change in the way they do business, so—and I will 

look at, you know, a list of these [inaudible], but we talk about Section 179, bonus depreciation minimis, that doesn’t even drill down 

to regular depreciation where over the years it’s been straight line 

MACRS, ACRS; there needs to be substantial reform in the write 

off of assets and consolidate all that, and come up with one method. Maybe combine Section 179 and bonus into a much simpler 

arena and get rid of all of the old code. I mean, I’d like to know, 

I should have looked, at how many there are just on depreciation 

but it’s huge. 

Representative BOUSTANY. Yeah, the depreciation issue, based on 

my reading of it, as to regard to tax reform, is just mind boggling. 

I can’t imagine, you know, having to deal with it day in and day 

out. Alan, you also mentioned AMT, and I’m sure this has affected 

some of our small business owners here. It is something we would 

like to get rid of, repealing AMT, putting that to rest once small, 

because it started as something, I think it was back in the Johnson 

Administration, targeting a handfull of wealthy people and this 

thing has just grown out of proportion affecting small businesses 

all across this country. Have any of you been affected adversely by 

the application of AMT? 

Mr. HEBERT. The AMT affects either mainly folks that, you 

know, sell capital, items that have capital gain most of the time. 

So, you have these tax laws that say if you have certain kinds of 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

32 

income it’s taxed at one rate, but if you have capital gain, it’s taxed 

at a lower rate because you’ve already been taxed on that money, 

but just in case you make too much, too big of a percentage of your 

income, it’s capital gains that they take away from you because you 

have this alternative minimum tax. So you have all these rules 

that supposedly meant to really spur investment and to compensate people for taking risks, but then you take it away if they 

do too good at it, so really people don’t understand it’s very complicated. You make them add back State income taxes. It just was, 

in my opinion, it’s a very bizarre calculation and it’s like, we’re 

going to give you all these things but then we are going to take 

them away at some point. 

Representative BOUSTANY. One final question, Sadie and Robert, 

both of you mentioned the cost of complying with the Tax Code and 

how it’s not only a nightmare, a headache, you have to deal with 

the IRS, but both of you would reinvest in your business and hire 

more people if you didn’t have to deal with it. Can you elaborate 

a little further on this? 

Ms. SHAMSIE. Absolutely. Absolutely I would. I’m so fearful of the 

IRS, and like I said, it just amazes me some of the letters I receive 

from them. My CPA firm, they handle everything, okay. I don’t, I 

gave that up. The time it would take me, and time is money, the 

time it would take me, my time is better spent trying to grow my 

business. I honestly could hire a full time employee, and we looked 

at possibly hiring someone fresh out of college with an accounting 

degree and I talked to a couple of friends, and they said, and I’m 

sure you had suggested, they said bad idea. It’s too complicated. All 

you’re going to do is get yourself in trouble and waste this money, 

stick with what you have. But, gee, I pay my accounting firm a lot 

of money and still, we—up until a couple of months ago, I honestly 

thought, I was starting to doubt, but we’ve been with the same 

CPA firm as long as we’ve been in business, that they were doing 

a bad job because of all these letters I was get sent, oh you didn’t 

pay. Then I found out from all the other small business owners, 

like oh, no, we get the same thing. So this happens to everyone. 

Yeah, it’s—gee wiz, it is complicated, it really is. For me it is, and 

I have a degree in Political Science; I don’t have an accounting 

background. Yeah, it’s just, and eight employees, nine employees, 

I have a small business. It’s way over my head. 

Chairman VITTER. And Sadie, if I could jump in just to put a little more meat on the bone. These letters get held up and those 

issues and questions when often the IRS is wrong, and you figured 

that out dollars and months or years later. In a year, how many 

of those sorts of matters from the IRS might you get, number one? 

Number two, an individual letter, if you put a dollar cost on that 

in terms of your cost hiring accountants, et cetera, what might it 

be for one of those letters? 

Ms. SHAMSIE. I know of one instance specifically, they were saying that there was like $325 I owed them in back taxes, and I was 

going to pay it, because my accountant said, I can take care of it, 

it’ll cost you $150, $200. Also I was advised, don’t pay it. Red flags 

are going to go up. It’s a mistake on their part. I kid you not, you 

know, I get so many of these letters is what I do now is I just stack 

them and I bring them to the accountant at the end of the month. 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

33 

In a month’s time, I promise you I always get at least one from the 

IRS. 

Chairman VITTER. Per month? 

Ms. SHAMSIE. Per month, yes. 

Chairman VITTER. And one of the more complicated or cumbersome letters, what might the final bill to your business have 

been? 

Ms. SHAMSIE. We had one that reporting 1099–S to the IRS when 

we started doing it electronically. We spent several thousand dollars because they waited two years to tell us that they didn’t receive the data, and we were like, oh no, we emailed it timely. We 

have the email confirming it, but they said the file is corrupt. Well 

it took them two years, so I had all these back taxes for not reporting these 1099–S. I spent several thousand dollars to clear the matter up, and it took about two years and more penalties, more penalties, and then finally at the end of it all—at one point it was over 

$60,000 they said we owed, and at the end of it all, I had what 

was, I think, $326; $265, and I was like let’s pay this, but several 

thousand dollars I spent. 

Chairman VITTER. Right. 

Charles. 

Representative BOUSTANY. That’s all I have. 

Mr. HEBERT. She brings up a good point. The IRS never issues 

notices quickly, so there’s a three year statute of limitations. Normally their notices come between the second and the third year. By 

then the penalties have racked up and the information is cold, and 

they never, ever, ever send you a notice like six months after you 

the return, two years later. 

Mr. MORING. I think that’s one of the biggest obstacles with the 

IRS is the lack of communication. You can’t even get anyone on the 

phone, for one thing. You know going back to that bonus depreciation, that was—even the media didn’t report that. From what I understand, that was probably one of the largest tax changes we’ve 

had in this country since the Reagan Administration, and you 

never heard word of it. Communication is key for a small business 

person. I think that going back to the bonus ending, 179 making 

it permanent, I think yes. But to answer your question, I think it’s 

going to be advantageous to us. Anything that we can do to lower 

the cost of the CPA, and that we have to outsource. I understood, 

one time my CPA told me, and I wanted to share that with y’all, 

is that there’s a form out there. It’s 80, 3115, or something like 

that, something to do with the bonus that was retro back, kind of 

mishandled by the IRS, that form is estimated an 84 hours to fill 

it out. I don’t know about y’all, but I can’t afford 84 hours to my 

accountant’s time to fill one form out that I don’t even understand 

so, you know, I’m sitting here on the side of Sadie, that we don’t 

understand a lot of it, we just outsource it. But we do know the 

bottom line is that if we can get the taxes lowered, and I think 

that’s the reason why we’re both S–Corps right now, is because 

that was the lesser of the evils for us to choose. 

Chairman VITTER. And another theme I certainly hear is certainty, predictability; right? Know what the rules are and know it 

is going to be permanent. Know what’s coming. 

Mr. MORING. Amen. 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

34 

Chairman VITTER. And we have a number of these things like 

Section 179, that are almost certainly going to be extended, but 

they’re only done at the last minute, or even retroactively. Now 

Alan, let me ask you, when Congress does that, when Washington 

does that, you know, these are provisions that are supposed to spur 

investment and spur activity, but if we do that at the eleventh 

hour, or at the thirteenth hour and do it retroactively, aren’t we 

essentially throwing most of that spur impact out the window? 

Mr. HEBERT. You absolutely are. That really makes no sense, but 

they were, as I understood, they were designed to spur activity, to 

buy equipment, to get manufacturing going, but when you pass it, 

I think on December 19, retroactive to January 1, that doesn’t do 

a whole lot of good. As we are staring it in the face again, what’s 

it going to be in the future? People don’t always just make decisions for that year. They make long term decisions also. I heard a 

lot about needing to hire extra people or accountants. A lot of clients have CPAs, CFOs, and they can’t, they don’t understand the 

tax law, so they still have to hire us. We’re more like a tax firm 

now because the laws are so complicated and so ever changing, and 

the 3115 he was talking about has to do with the Minimis rules. 

You have to fill out a change in accounting policy. That’s an 8-page 

form, and it took a lot of time. They have made some changes, 

though. It only applies to a few people, but when we first got it, 

the rules were such that everyone, every business was going to 

have to file one of those. 

Chairman VITTER. Right. Well, we’re going to wrap up. First, 

let’s all thank our great witnesses for giving us insight into these 

issues. Thank y’all very much. 

[Applause]. 

I really appreciate your being here. You gave very compelling 

testimony about what it’s like in the real world dealing with this 

stuff. Also, I want to thank my colleague, Charles Boustany. 

Charles, thanks for co-hosting this event. Even more important, 

thanks for all your work on these issues, including on the Ways 

and Means Committee. 

Representative BOUSTANY. Well, thank you, David. Thank you 

for your leadership. 

Chairman VITTER. Thank you. And we want to thank the City/ 

Parish for hosting us today, and last but certainly not least, thanks 

to all of you for coming out and directly participating. As I said at 

the beginning, when I became Chair of the Small Business Committee, the first thing I wanted to do was to take the Committee 

to the real world, not keep it in a bubble in Washington. Take it 

to the real world, including Louisiana; talk to people in the real 

world; understand the real challenges of small businesses and 

make the count in terms of the IRS, Small Business Administration, and other things. So this forum was really helpful in that regard. Thank you for coming out and being a key part of it. Finally, 

I want to keep in touch with you on an ongoing basis. If you have 

a handout from me here, please keep that handy, because the blue 

column on the left side of the page has all of my contact information, including our Lafayette office, including our website, which 

has easy email access. So please use all of that to stay in touch. 

Thank y’all very much. 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER

35 

[Applause]. 

[Whereupon, at 9:32 a.m., the hearing was adjourned.] 

Æ 

LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER