alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07-0146-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MAY 15, 2007

______________________________

DUTCH GIRL OF TEXAS, INC., ET AL, APPELLANTS

V.

HRH OF AMARILLO, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 90,114-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By letter dated April 17, 2007, this Court directed Appellant, Dutch Girl of Texas,

Inc., et al, to pay the required filing fee of $125 within ten days. The Court noted that

failure to do so might result in dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the Clerk of this
2

Court is required to collect filing fees set by statute or the Supreme Court when an item is

presented for filing. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 and 12.1(b). Although the filing of a notice of

appeal invokes this Court’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of

appellate procedure, the appeal may be dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b).

Consequently, because the filing fee remains unpaid, we must dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure and with a notice from the Clerk requiring payment of the filing fee

within ten days. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
P.O. BOX 790490 • SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78279-0490 • (210) 824-9421

SUBJECT: REVISION TO SA26-AT DASH TWO AFM

TO: ALL OPERATORS AND AFM MANAGERS OF THE SA26-AT DASH TWO

1. Attached is the Revision dated May 14, 2015 to your AFM. 

2. File this transmittal letter in your AFM binder behind the Title Page.

3. Insert Revision 9 Log of Effective Pages behind the Transmittal Page.

4. Replace Section III Index with the revised Index.

5. Replace Section III pages III-1 thru III-8 with revised pages.



































ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
ENTERED IN ERROR 

DO NOT USE
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 24, 2023 No. 04-22-00477-CR EX PARTE Ricardo Guevara AGUIRRE From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10426CR Honorable Dennis Powell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Pending before the court is Appellant’s request to file supplemental briefing. We hereby grant Appellant’s request and accept Appellant’s supplemental brief as filed. We also note that the State has filed a response to Appellant’s supplement, and we accept it as filed.
It is so ORDERED on January 24, 2023. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            561,104
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     720,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,133,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,647,792
<PP&E>                                          1,347,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5,314,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,458,827
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           10,753
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,520,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    5,314,303
<SALES>                                         4,465,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,465,876
<CGS>                                           2,163,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,492,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                111,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,301,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,301,086)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,301,086)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.32)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6861

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIE BURLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-59, CA-97-186) Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Burley, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Willie Burley appeals the district court’s order denying hisFed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking relief from an earlier district court order denying Burley’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burley , Nos. CR-94-59; CA-97-186 (N.D.W. Va. May 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bing Yeh, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Silicon Storage
Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure control and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

1. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003



|/s/ Bing Yeh                                  
|----------------------------------------------
|Bing Yeh
President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23-0644

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

MATTHEW ROBERTS,

Petitioner and Appellee,

and

FIDELA ROBERTS,

Respondent and Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S 

RESPONSE BRIEF

Pursuant to authority granted under M. R. App. P. 26(1), Appellee is given an 

extension of time until March 29, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve Appellee’s 

response brief.

DATED this ____ day of February 2024.

Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court 

__________________________________________________________________

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 27 2024

02/27/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0644
Motion Granted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and 

Memorandum Opinion filed October 3, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00654-CV

IN RE AIDA TIPTON, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Probate Court No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 518,963

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 5, 2024, relator Aida Tipton filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Pamela 

Medina, presiding judge of the Probate Court No. 2 of Harris County, to vacate the 

trial court’s August 16, 2024, order granting amended Rule 202 petition for 

deposition to investigate for potential claims.
2

On September 20, 2024, real party in interest Vickie Dempsey, individually 

and as executor of the estate of Michael Tipton, deceased (“RPI”), filed a motion 

to dismiss, arguing the petition for writ of mandamus is moot because RPI filed a 

dismissal of the Rule 202 petition in the trial court. 

Because the record reflects that on September 17, 2024, RPI filed in the trial 

court a dismissal of RPI’s Rule 202 petition, we grant RPI’s motion to dismiss

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

Solely for the purposes of complying
with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas M. Rettler, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, of Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge, that:

| | (1) | the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three- and nine-month periods ended
          September 30, 2006 (the Quarterly Report) to which this statement
is           an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Gehl Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 7, 2006

| | /s/ William D. Gehl  
| | ---------------------
| | William D. Gehl      
| | /s/ Thomas M. Rettler
| | Thomas M. Rettler
Gormas, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Follow Up Flag: 

Flag Status: 

Dear Mr. Gormas, 

Glen Boyd <gboyd@ci.show-low.az.us> 

Friday, December 19, 2014 5:56 PM 

Gormas, Michael (OST) 

Bill Kopp 

EAS proposal deadline extension 

Follow up 

Completed 

We understand that Mokulele Flight Service Inc. has requested a four week extension from you for their EAS proposal 

submission. The original deadline is December 22, 2014 and they have asked for an extension to January 20, 2015. 

We feel that this is a reasonable request and we support an extension of the deadline to at least January 20, 2015. 

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Glen Boyd 

Manager 

Show Low Regional Airport 

Show Low~ Arizona 

928-532-4192 

1 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Essential Air Service at 

KINGMAN, ARIZONA 

PAGE, ARIZONA 

PRESCOTT, ARIZONA 

SHOW LOW, ARIZONA 

Under 49 U.S.C. §41731 et seq. 

) 

) 

) 

) Docket OST-1996-1899 

) Docket OST-1997-2694 

) Docket OST-1996-1899 

) Docket OST-1998-4409 

) 

) 

REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENTION 

BY MOKULELE FLIGHT SERVICE INC. 

Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: 

Ron Hansen 

CEO 

Mokulele Flight Service Inc. 

73-350 U'u Street 

Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 

Telephone: 808-840-9002 

Fax: 808-326-1266 

Email: ron.hansen@mokulelehawaii.com 

Mokulele Flight Service Inc. respectfully requests a four week extension of the submission 

deadline date of December 22, 2014 as set by the Department of Transportation in its' 

solicitation of carrier proposals in the above mentioned cities to on or about January 20, 2014 (as 

Monday January 19 is a Federal holiday). Mokulele requests the additional time to complete its 

necessary due diligence on these markets and complete negotiations with potential codeshare 

partners and aircraft manufacturers. 

Submitted: December 19, 2014 

Ron Hansen 

CEO 

Mokulele Flight Service Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Gehl
Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 29, 1997 and condensed
consolidated statements of income for the three-month period ended March 29,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                            3137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    70183
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      17483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 97659
<PP&E>                                           58511
<DEPRECIATION>                                   36024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  129258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35257
<BONDS>                                          22414<F2>
<COMMON>                                           619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       66928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    129258
<SALES>                                          43675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 43675
<CGS>                                            30692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    30692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3952
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1423
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Company presents receivables on a net basis in compliance with Article 10
of Regulation S-X.
<F2>Includes all non-current portion of debt obligations
<F3>Not reported
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Final Order Approving Certification - In re: FPL Port Everglades Energy Center 

(PA12-57) - OGC 12-0710

Linero, Alvaro to: Andrew Parks 11/13/2012 02:24 PM

Cc: Heather Ceron, Kathleen Forney, Gregg Worley

Hi Andrew:

Attached is the Final Florida Power Plant Site Certification regarding the Port Everglades project.

Thank you.

Al Linero.

A. A. Linero, P.E.

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Office of Permitting and Compliance

850‐717‐9076

Did you know that the Department may not require you to submit a Title V fee for the 2012 calendar year? To learn more, 

please visit us online at the following web address: www.title5feeholiday.com

Please take a few minutes to share your comments on the service you received from the department by 

clicking on this link DEP Customer Survey.

*********************** ATTACHMENT NOT DELIVERED 

*******************

This Email message contained an attachment named 

 image001.jpg 

which may be a computer program. This attached computer program 

could

contain a computer virus which could cause harm to EPA's 

computers, 

network, and data. The attachment has been deleted.

This was done to limit the distribution of computer viruses 

introduced

into the EPA network. EPA is deleting all computer program 

attachments

sent from the Internet into the agency via Email.

If the message sender is known and the attachment was legitimate, 

you

should contact the sender and request that they rename the file 
name

extension and resend the Email with the renamed attachment. 

After

receiving the revised Email, containing the renamed attachment, 

you can

rename the file extension to its correct name.

For further information, please contact the EPA Call Center at

(866) 411-4EPA (4372). The TDD number is (866) 489-4900.

*********************** ATTACHMENT NOT DELIVERED 

***********************

12-0710 12-0710 - Final Order.pd Order.pdf
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)
AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended

June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick W. Cavanagh, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
 Company.

|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ PATRICK W. CAVANAGH
|                       
|Patrick W. Cavanagh    
|Chief Executive Officer
|Williams Controls, Inc.
|August 7, 2009         

---
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 26 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -01113- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.R.A. AND M.V.A., CHILDREN ,

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-47980

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from a contempt order. A court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review a contempt order on direct appeal. Tex. Animal Health
Comm ’n v. Nunley , 647 S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. 1983).
On October 22, 2019, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before November 4, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P

. 42.3(a). Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the appeal.2

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRYCE J. WALLACE, ELITE

DRILLERS CORPORATION, and

Intervenor UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY

COMPANY and its parent, UNITED FIRE

GROUP, INC.,

Appellants,

v.

ENERGEN RESOURCES

CORPORATION,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00248

- CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 15

- 04

- 21001

- CVR)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the

cou rt below and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion . We

further order that Appellants recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution

issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

I T IS SO ORDERED THIS 24 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00123-CV

CULBERSON-STOWERS, INC.; RICHARD 

W. STOWERS JR.; AND CULBERSON 

RENTAL AND LEASING CO., INC.,

Appellants

V.

LEASE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, 

Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at Law 

No. 2

of Tarrant County (2020-004176-2)

November 16, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

It is further ordered that Culberson-Stowers, Inc.; Richard W. Stowers Jr.; and 

Culberson Rental and Leasing Co., Inc. shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let 

execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel