alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          40,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,457
<PP&E>                                           3,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,777)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,073
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,691
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,873
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,550
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock-Option Plan



 
Exhibit 10.04a 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 PRAXAIR, INC. 1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

 Section 9 of the Praxair, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors is hereby amended in its entirety as follows,
effective as of October 24, 2006: 
 “9. Dilution and Other Adjustment. 
 In the event of any change in the outstanding shares of the Company by reason of any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, consolidation,
combination or exchange of shares or other similar corporate change or in the event of any special distribution to the stockholders, the Committee shall make equitable adjustments in the number of shares and prices per share applicable to options
then outstanding and in the number of shares which are available thereafter for option grants, both under the Plan as a whole and with respect to individuals. Such adjustments shall be made in a manner that the Committee determines is necessary and
appropriate, and shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes of the Plan.” 
  

	
	October 24, 2006
	
	PRAXAIR, INC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. at June 30, 1998, and its statement of income
for the six months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. for the six months ended June 30,
1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         822,009
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,911
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      17,552,433
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,321,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,301,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,401,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,301,757
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,296,861
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  235,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,204,135
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,204,135
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,204,135
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

d0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138957

CONNER CREEK ACADEMY EAST, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138957 COA: 289241 Macomb CC: 07-004923-CZ DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH and BUREAU OF CONSTRUCTION CODES, Defendant-Appellee,

and

CITY OF WARREN, Intervening Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 16, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Order entered October 9, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01305
- CV DEEN T. WILLIAMSON, Appellant
V. CRAIG HOWARD, ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. CC
- 13
- 03662
- B 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s September 26, 2013 “motion for review of the trial court sustaining appellant’s affidavit of indigence” and her September 30, 2013 motion to correct the title of the September 26, 2013 motion and “amended motion requesting the Fifth Court of Appeals review the trial court’s sustaining the contest against appellant’s affidavit of indigence.” The Court GRANTS the motions

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1(j)(4). We ORDER Lanetta J. Williams, Off icial Court Reporter of the County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas, to file the court reporter’s record in this case within thirty days of the date of this order, without requiring prepayment of costs. We ORDER the Dallas County Clerk to file t he clerk’s record in this case within thirty days of the date of this order, without requiring prepayment of costs./s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5802 Transcranial magnetic stimulation system for neurological and psychiatric disorders and conditions. ( a ) *Identification.* A transcranial magnetic stimulation system for neurological and psychiatric disorders and conditions is a prescription, non-implantable device that uses brief duration, rapidly alternating, or pulsed, magnetic fields to induce neural activity in the cerebral cortex. It is not intended for applying or focusing magnetic fields towards brain areas outside cerebral cortex (e.g., cerebellum). A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation system that is intended to treat major depressive disorder is classified in § 882.5805. A transcranial magnetic stimulation system for headache is classified in § 882.5808.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Performance testing must demonstrate electromagnetic compatibility, electrical safety, and thermal safety.
( 2 ) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
( 3 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 4 ) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Magnetic pulse output testing;
( ii ) Magnetic and electrical field testing;
( iii ) Testing of the safety features built into the device; and
( iv ) Testing of the sound levels patients are exposed to during device use.
( 5 ) The physician and patient labeling must include the following: ( i ) The risks and benefits associated with use of the device;
( ii ) Detailed instructions to prevent seizures, to monitor the patient for seizure activity during treatment, and to provide seizure management care if one were to occur during treatment; and
( iii ) A description of the ear protection to be worn by the patient during use of the device, including the type of protection and its noise reduction rating.
[84 FR 9230, Mar. 14, 2019]
#### ROBERT A. HOOE AND ARTHUR HERBERT v. THE UNITED STATES.

[43 C. Cls. R., 245; 218 U. S. R., 322.]

Congress appropriate “m *full compensation ”*for the rent of a building for the Civil Service Commission $4,000. In pursuance of the statute creating the commission (22 Stat. L., p. 403), which provides “ *That it shall he the duty of the Secretary of the Interior to cause suitable and convenient rooms * *** *to be provided** * * *for carrying on the world of saAd commission,”*the Secretary rents a building for the use of the commission “ *except the basement thereof,”*paying therefor the amount appropriated. The commission holds over for a number of years, the defendants paying the same rent, but the owners demanding a higher rent. Subsequently the commission occupies the basement, though not included in the lease. During this continued occupancy the owners demand rent for the basement in excess of the amount appropriated by Congress.

The court below decides:

I.Where the Government goes into possession under a written lease and continues to occupy after the expiration of the term, the relation between the owners and the Government is that of a tenant holding over.

II.Complaints and threats on the part of the owners of a building do not amount to a notice to quit.

III.Where the landlord suffers the tenant to continue in possession, the law presumes the holding to' be upon the same terms prescribed in the written lease; and rent paid by the Government and receipts given by the owner enlarge this presumption into a positive conclusion.

*656IV. Congress bold the purse strings of the Government, and no officer can by evasion or indirection deprive Congress of their authority to control and direct appropriations.

Y. The Civil Service Commission, being in possession of a part of-a building under an express lease, could not, by using the whole of the building, increase the liability of the Government beyond the amount to which the rental was limited by an appropriation act.

VI. The rule to be deduced from the statutes regulating the renting of buildings for Government purposes in the District of Columbia and from the decisions interpreting them is this: Where there is no specific appropriation limiting the amount which may be paid as rent, an implied contract may arise by reason of a public officer in the performance of a duty taking possession of and using a building for Government purposes. But where there is a specific appropriation limiting the amount to be paid as rent, a lease which reserves a rent exceeding the amount authorized by Congress is expressly-prohibited by other statutes and is *pro tanto*void; and no contract can be implied from the occupancy which will involve the Government in a greater liability than that fixed by Congress.

The decision of the court below is affirmed on the same grounds.

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court November 28, 1910.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 7th day of November, 2008.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/S/ BING YEH                         
|Bing Yeh                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, September 15, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, September 15, 2009 at 1 p.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: July 30, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-18774 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 1.860-5 Effective date. ( a ) *In general.* Section 860 and §§ 1.860-1 through 1.860-4 apply with respect to determinations after November 6, 1978.
( b ) *Prior determination of real estate investments trusts.* Section 859 (as in effect before the enactment of the Revenue Act of 1978) applies to determinations with respect to real estate investment trusts occurring after October 4, 1976, and before November 7, 1978. In the case of such a determination, the rules in §§ 1.860-1 through 1.860-4 apply, a reference in this chapter 1 to section 860 (or to a particular provision of section 860) shall be considered to be a reference to section 859 (or to the corresponding substantive provision of section 859), as in effect before enactment of the Revenue Act of 1978, and “qualified investment entity” in §§ 1.381(c)25-1(a) and 1.860-1 through 1.860-3 means a real estate investment trust.
(Sec. 7805, 68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805; sec. 860(e) (92 Stat. 2849, 26 U.S.C. 860(e)); sec. 860(g) (92 Stat. 2850, 26 U.S.C. 860(g)))
[T.D. 7936, 49 FR 2109, Jan. 18, 1984]
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Council Directive on control of San José Scale

COM(2006) 123 final — 2006/0040 (CNS)

(2006/C 309/15)

On 2 May 2006 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 37 and 94 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

The Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 24 May 2006. The rapporteur was Mr Siecker.

At its 428th plenary session, held on 5 and 6 July 2006 (meeting of 5 July), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 166 votes to two with one abstention.

1.   Introduction

2.   General comments

Brussels, 5 July 2006.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----
# NAVIGATOR CS, LLC

Chart a Course to Project Success

March 2, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request in accordance with 14 CFR Part 11 and Section 333 of Public Law 112-95 (the 2012 Reform Act) from 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H; 14 CFR 61.113 (a) and (b); 14 CFR 91.7(a); 14 CFR 91.103(b); 14 CFR 91.119(c); 14 CFR 91.121; 14 CFR 91.151(a)(1); 14 CFR 91.405(a); 14 CFR 91.407(a)(1); 14 CFR 91.409 (a)(1) and (2);14 CFR 91.417 (a) and ib).

Dear Sir or Madam: 

### Attached please find Navigator CS, LLC's ("Navigator") request for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations to allow commercial operation of its Small Unmanned Aircraft System ("sUAS") Inspire 1, manufactured by DJI Innovations. Navigator intends to use the Inspire 1 to obtain 

### aerial imaging in support of engineering surveys of construction sites, existing buildings and facilities, and other sites, for the purpose of monitoring and ensuring site safety, proper material usage, quality of workmanship, and/or to inspect the integrity of buildings and/or structures, including but not limited to bridges, dams and others. Also attached to this letter is the Operating Manual for the Inspire 1, outlining its operating requirements, limitations, and technical specifications; as well as "Navigator CS, LLC's Pre-Flight Checklist for Srnall Unmanned Aircraft 

### Systems (sUAS) Used in Commercial Operations." 

### Navigator submits this Checklist as proprietary information pursuant to 14 CFR 11.35 (b). The Checklist contains operating conditions and procedures that are not available to the public and are protected from release under the Freedom of Information Act 5 USC 552 et. seq. We at Navigator CS, LLC thank you in advance for your time and consideration. We trust that the attached documents are self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions or comments, or need further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me by phone at (703)568-7780 or by e-mail at gmiller@navigatores.com

. Very truly yours,

~S~ 

# u hr ~ • Y~'~•.~-c~. Gladys M. gliller, M.S., M.B.A. Senior Project Engineer Attachment A: "Navigator CS, LLC's Pre-Flight Checklist for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) Used in

Com mercial Operations" Attachment B: "lnspire 1 Operating Manual"

1523 Kinnaird Ter NE, Leesburg, VA 20176 (T) 571-309-7995 * WWW.NAVIGATORCS.COM
#### KELLY *v.*CASS.

Deeds — Evidence—Undue Influence — Fkaud.

Reviewing the conclusion of the circuit judge upon the evidence, a deed of conveyance from deceased to defendants, *held,*to have been intelligently and freely executed.

Appeal from Eaton; Smith, J.

Submitted April 21, 1915.

(Docket No. 129.)

Decided June 7, 1915.

Bill by Angeline, Kelly and another against Lincoln Cass and others to set aside a certain conveyance. From a decree for defendants, complainants appeal.

Affirmed.

*George Huggett*and *John C. Nichols,*for complainants.

*Elmer N. Peters (Garry C. Fox,*of counsel), for defendants.

Ostrander, J.

A single ultimate question of fact is involved. It is whether Laura J. Vickery, deceased, intelligently and freely executed a certain conveyance of real estate. An analysis of the testimony will profit no one. We are impressed that the preponderance of evidence supports the conclusion of the court below, and the decree is therefore affirmed, with costs to appellees.

Brooke, C. J., and McAlvay, Kuhn, Stone, Bird, Moore, and Steere, JJ., concurred.