alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ROBERT LEE MYERS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 747 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 18th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### Bo LIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6528.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 19, 2002.

Bo Lin, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Bo Lin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Lin v. Ashcroft,*No. CA-02-37-L (D.Md. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Ziegler, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 23, 2016  /s/ Karen Ziegler Karen Ziegler Principal Financial Officer Principal Executive Officer
39669.

#### HEFFNER v. DUTTON, by Next Friend.

Decided October 11, 1962

Rehearing denied October 25, 1962.

*Bagwell & Hames, Merritt & Pruitt, James A. Bagwell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ludo L. Russo, Allen J. Hamner,*contra.

Bell, Judge.

The only question to be decided here is whether the plaintiff’s petition contains a sufficient prayer for process. The defendant’s highly technical argument is that because there *787was no express prayer for the issuance of process, the process was issued without authority and was, therefore, void.

Process has been defined as the means whereby a court compels the appearance of the defendant before it or a compliance with its demands. It is necessary in order to give the court jurisdiction of the proceedings brought against the defendant. *Neal-Millard Co. v. Owens,*115 Ga. 959, 961 (42 SE 266). The only purpose of process is to give the party proper notice of the proceedings and when his appearance will be required, and where that is done, the process has served its purpose. *Gay v. Sylvania Central Railway Co.,*79 Ga. App. 362 (1), 366 (53 SE2d 713). Furthermore, no technical or formal objections shall be held to invalidate process, and if it conforms substantially to the requirements of the statute and the defendant has notice of the pendency of the cause, it is adequate. *Code*§ 81-220. We feel the same principle should apply to the prayer for process which should not be vitiated by such objections. “No technical or formal objections shall invalidate any petition; but if the same shall substantially conform to the requirements of this Code, and the defendant has had notice of the pendency of the cause, all other objections shall be disregarded, provided a legal cause of action ... is set forth.” *Code*§ 81-114.

In the present case process was not only issued but was duly served upon the defendant. While the prayer of the petition did not literally call for process to be *issued,*it did ask that service of process be *perfected*upon the defendant. This, we feel, necessarily included a request for process to be issued. How could it be served upon the defendant if it were not issued? How could it be “perfected” (as prayed) if it were never issued?

While the prayer as to process was not perfect, it was adequate and within the spirit and the purpose of the law. The prayer in the present petition, we think, necessarily included a prayer that process be issued.

The trial court properly denied the motion to vacate the judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Hall, J., concur*
EXHIBIT 32.2

            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


I, Mark B. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Giant Industries, Inc. ("Giant"),
do hereby certify that: (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Giant for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") to which this
certification is being furnished as an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Giant.

Giant Industries, Inc.


By:  /s/ MARK B. COX
-----------------------------
Name:   Mark B. Cox
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:   August 13, 2003.
# C_2015354EN.01003802.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — Laverana v OHIM (BIO organic)

(Case T-610/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark BIO organic - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 354/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laverana GmbH & Co. KG (Wennigsen, Germany) (represented by: J. Wachinger, M. Zöbisch and D. Chatterjee, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 June 2014 (Case R 301/2014-4) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign BIO organic as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Laverana GmbH & Co. KG to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laverana GmbH & Co. KG to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39098-39099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMTC03000-L10200000-PK0000]


Notice of Public Meeting, Dakotas Resource Advisory Council 
Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory

[[Page 39099]]

Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Dakotas Resource Advisory Council will 
meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 2, 2009. The meeting will 
begin at 8 a.m. on September 2, 2009. The public comment period will 
begin at 1 p.m. on Wednesday, September 2, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the BLM North Dakota Field 
Office, 99 23rd Avenue West, Dickinson, North Dakota 58601.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in North and South Dakota. All meetings are open to the public. The 
public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council 
meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. 
Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time 
available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation, or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact the BLM as provided below. The Council will hear updates 
to ongoing planning efforts and assist in evaluating areas of 
ecological importance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lonny Bagley, Field Manager, North 
Dakota Field Office, 99 23rd Avenue West, Dickinson, North Dakota 
701.227.7700, or Marian Atkins, Field Manager, South Dakota Field 
Office, 310 Roundup St., Belle Fourche, South Dakota, 605.892.7000.

    Dated: July 30, 2009.
Lonny R. Bagley,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. E9-18700 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certification ofthe Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas W. McMinn, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| November 13, 2007 |   | /s/ Douglas W. McMinn                 |
|-------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|              |   | Douglas W. McMinn,                    |
|              |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 35.3



| | 
| | 



Annual
StatementofCompliance

Morgan
StanleyBankofAmericaMerrillLynchTrust2015-C25



VIA:
EMAIL



Banc
ofAmericaMerrillLynchCommercialMortgageInc.

One
BryantPark

New
York,NewYork10036

Attention:
LelandF.Bunch,III

leland.f.bunch@baml.com



EightfoldRealEstate
Capital,L.P.

1111
LincolnRoad,Suite802

Miami
Beach,Florida33139

Attention:
BrianTageson

btageson@eightfoldcapital.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com



| | Re: | Pooling
                                         andServicingAgreementdatedasofOctober1,
                                         2015(the“Agreement”)
                                         betweenBanc ofAmerica MerrillLynch Commercial Mortgage
                                         Inc.,asDepositor, Wells FargoBank, National
                                         Association, asMaster Servicer, Midland
                                         Loan Services, aDivision of PNCBank, National Association,as Special
                                         Servicer, Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC,as Trust Advisor and U.S.Bank National
                                         Association, asTrustee, CertificateAdministrator,Certificate Registrar,
                                         Authenticating Agentand Custodian.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I,KimberlyO.Jacobs,aSeniorVicePresident ofU.S.BankNational Association,asCertificateAdministrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:



(1)A
reviewoftheactivitiesoftheCertificateAdministratorduring
theprecedingcalendaryear (the“ReportingPeriod”)andoftheperformanceoftheCertificate
Administrator undertheAgreement has been
made undermy supervision; and



(2)To
thebestofmyknowledge,basedonsuchreview,theCertificateAdministratorhasfulfilledallitsobligationsunder the Agreement
in all materialrespectsthroughout such
Reporting Period.





CapitalizedtermsusedbutnotdefinedhereinhavethemeaningssetforthintheAgreement.





Date:   March
10, 2016





U.S.
BankNationalAssociation,asCertificateAdministrator





|By: | /s/
    Kimberly O. Jacobs                       | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|    | Kimberly
    O. Jacobs
    Senior Vice President |
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4449 — KKR/SIF (Tarkett))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 305/08)

On 7 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John T. Grigsby, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/JOHN T. GRIGSBY, JR.John T. Grigsby, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

November 14, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 38473)    
Notice is hereby given that, on June 17, 2009, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on High-Efficiency Dilute Gasoline Engine II, (“HEDGE II”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Herndon, VA has been added as a party to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group remains open, and HEDGE II intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On February 19, 2009, HEDGE II filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on April 2, 2009 (74 FR 15003).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-18324 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2015-CCRE26 Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 29, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 30 Agreed to House (ATH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 30

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 1995

 Mr. Scarborough submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
February 16, 1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
February 21, 1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, February 16, 1995, 
pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader or his designee, in 
accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon, or at such time on that day as may be specified by the majority 
leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, on 
Wednesday, February 22, 1995, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the House and the minority leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
#### State of Connecticut *v.*James A. Moore

Argued March 5

decided March 5, 1968

*Edward J. Daly,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state)

*Arnold M. Schwolsky,*assistant public defender, for the appellant (defendant).

The motion by the state to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County so far as it relates to the second count of the information is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


I, Fred L. Holliger, Chief Executive Officer of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant"), do hereby certify that: (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Giant for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") to which
this certification is being furnished as an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Giant.

Giant Industries, Inc.


By:  /s/ FRED L. HOLLIGER
--------------------------------
Name:  Fred L. Holliger
Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date:   August 13, 2003.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 92

Condemning the proposed withdrawal of North Korea from the Treaty on

the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 2 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Mr. ROBB (for himself, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. HELMS, Mr. MURKOWSKI, and Mr.

D’AMATO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Condemning the proposed withdrawal of North Korea from

the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,

and for other purposes.

Whereas North Korea stated its intention on March 12,

1993, to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done on July 1, 1968;

Whereas North Korea remains obligated under the Treaty for

a 90-day period;

Whereas no other country has ever formally withdrawn from

the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;

Whereas no other country has ever compelled the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to request a special inspection of its nuclear facilities;
2

•SRES 92 IS

Whereas North Korea refuses to allow a special inspection of

suspected nuclear waste sites in violation of the Treaty

on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;

Whereas representatives from 35 countries make up the

IAEA Board of Governors allowing the Agency to act in

an impartial manner;

Whereas the United States withdrew all tactical nuclear

weapons from the Korean peninsula in 1991; and

Whereas annual Team Spirit U.S.-Republic of Korea exercises are conducted for defensive purposes and are not a

provocative act of war: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That (a) the Senate hereby condemns North

2 Korea for its stated intention to withdraw from the Treaty

3 on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

4 (b) It is the sense of the Senate that the United

5 States and its international partners should take meas6 ured steps to compel North Korea to remain a party to

7 the Treaty and to allow unconditional special inspections

8 of apparent nuclear waste sites and other areas suspected

9 of harboring a nuclear weapons-building program.

Æ