alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.1256(e)-1 Identification of hedging transactions. ( a ) *Identification and recordkeeping requirements.* Under section 1256(e)(2), a taxpayer that enters into a hedging transaction must identify the transaction as a hedging transaction before the close of the day on which the taxpayer enters into the transaction.
( b ) *Requirements for identification.* The identification of a hedging transaction for purposes of section 1256(e)(2) must satisfy the requirements of § 1.1221-2(f)(1). Solely for purposes of section 1256(f)(1), however, an identification that does not satisfy all of the requirements of § 1.1221-2(f)(1) is nevertheless treated as an identification under section 1256(e)(2).
( c ) *Consistency with § 1.1221-2 .* Any identification for purposes of § 1.1221-2(f)(1) is also an identification for purposes of this section. If a taxpayer satisfies the requirements of § 1.1221-2(g)(1)(ii), the transaction is treated as if it were not identified as a hedging transaction for purposes of section 1256(e)(2).
( d ) *Effective date.* The rules of this section apply to transactions entered into on or after March 20, 2002.
[T.D. 8985, 67 FR 12870, Mar. 20, 2002; 67 FR 31955, May 13, 2002]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 145 (Thursday, July 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,882]


Belcher-Robinson Foundry, Alexander City, AL; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated June 25, 2009, the petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on 
June 17, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the Federal 
Register on July 14, 2009 (74 FR 34038).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of automotive drive train components 
did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject 
firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information regarding customers of the subject firm and 
imports of automotive drive train components.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of July 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18180 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

2021-NCSC-8

No. 190A20

Filed 12 March 2021

PAMELA GAY, Executrix of the Estate of JOAN R. FRANKLIN

v.

SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP, L.L.C., and AUTUMN CORPORATION, d/b/a 

Autumn Care of Raeford

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 

the Court of Appeals, 842 S.E.2d 635 (N.C. Ct. App. 2020), affirming an order denying 

defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings entered on 11 June 

2019 by Judge Mary Ann Tally in Superior Court, Hoke County. Heard in the 

Supreme Court on 17 February 2021.

Rachel A. Fuerst and Rebecca J. Britton for plaintiff-appellee.

Bradley K. Overcash and Daniel E. Peterson for defendant-appellants.

Narendra K. Ghosh for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin
J. Cullum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2015-C Owner Trust
(the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association

Date: June 26, 2018



By: /s/ Kevin J. CullumKevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

VICOR CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

SYNQOR, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1593

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,702.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Vicor Corporation moves unopposed to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42(b) (2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. Case: 22-1593 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 01/13/2023VICOR CORPORATION v. SYNQOR

, INC

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

January 13 , 2023

Dat e F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: J anuary 13, 2023 Case: 22-1593 Document: 27 Page: 2 Filed: 01/13/2023
# Euroopan unionin C 301A/12.

| | ISSN 1725-2490 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 301A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 49. vuosikerta12. joulukuuta 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2490

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 301A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

49. vuosikerta12. joulukuuta 2006

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Tiedotteita |
| | Komissio |
| 2006/C 301A/1 | Yhteisön kasvilajikevirasto – Kiinnostuksen ilmaisupyyntö yhteisön kasvilajikeviraston valituslautakunnan puheenjohtajan ja varapuheenjohtajan paikkaa varten | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

III   Tiedotteita

Komissio

2006/C 301A/1

Yhteisön kasvilajikevirasto – Kiinnostuksen ilmaisupyyntö yhteisön kasvilajikeviraston valituslautakunnan puheenjohtajan ja varapuheenjohtajan paikkaa varten

1

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

III Tiedotteita

Komissio

| 12.12.2006 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 301/1

---

YHTEISÖN KASVILAJIKEVIRASTO

Kiinnostuksen ilmaisupyyntö yhteisön kasvilajikeviraston valituslautakunnan puheenjohtajan ja varapuheenjohtajan paikkaa varten

(2006/C 301 A/01)

Kasvilajikevirasto etsii valituslautakuntaansa puheenjohtajaa ja varapuheenjohtajaa.

Hakijan on oltava Euroopan unionin jonkin jäsenvaltion kansalainen.

Neuvosto nimittää puheenjohtajan ja varapuheenjohtajan ehdokasluettelon perusteella, jonka komissio esittää saatuaan viraston hallintoneuvoston lausunnon. Tietoja maksettavasta korvauksesta voi pyytää valituslautakunnan sihteeristöltä (Community Plant Variety Office, 3 Boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). Yhteisön kasvilajikevirasto ja komissio noudattavat tasa-arvopolitiikkaa.

Toimenkuvauksen, hakulomakkeet ja hakemusten lähettämistä koskevat ohjeet voi ladata Internet-osoitteesta:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

tai

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Hakemuksia otetaan vastaan 31. tammikuuta 2007 saakka (ks. lisätiedot hakuohjeista).

---
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-16-000035216-MAR-201807:52 AM
November 22, 2011

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590

Itai Shoshani

Chief Pilot

Zip Aviation

14 Hangar Road

White Plains, NY 106

Certificate # Z6VA330L

Phone # 646-961-3233

To whom it may concern,

Zip Aviation LLC, Certificate # Z6VA330L and 91.146 LOA # ZIPJEA11 3/11/2011, would 

like to apply for a grant of exemption from Title 14, Part 120, to permit us, operating 

under separate parts of the regulations, to cover, with an equivalent level of safety, our 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

We are currently covered for both our 135 and our Air Tour

programs by an approved FAA/DOT drug and alcohol testing program,

through a Consortium/Third Party Administrator:

Professional Air Charter Services, Inc.

(program manager John Carpenter)

Drug Abatement / AMPP Consortium

Kansas City, MO

816 942 2144

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Itai Shoshani
### Order issuedJAM - 5 , 2.000

In The 

## Court afAppeals Jftftlj WxBttxtt of teas at Dallas No. 05-96-01989-CR 

### PATRICKDEON HOWARD, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ORDER The motion ofthe Attorney General ofTexas to withdraw the record is GRANTED. 

### The Clerkof this Courtis ORDERED to send the appellate record in the abovenumbered cause to: Charles A. Plamer, Assistant Attorney General c/o John Davilia, Records Clerk Price Daniel, Sr. Bldg. P.O.Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-2548 

### Charles A. Palmer, Assistant Attorney General, is ORDERED to return the appellaterecord in the above-numbered cause to this Court within sixty days ofthe dateofUhis Order. 

### )A THOMAj CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT OF ACTING 

PRESIDENT JUDGE OF THE TWENTYEIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, 

VENANGO COUNTY

:

:

:

:

:

No. 368 Judicial Classification Docket 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

 AND NOW, this 17

th day of November 2021, due to the unavailability of the Honorable 

Oliver J. Lobaugh, President Judge of the Twenty-eighth Judicial District, Venango 

County, pursuant to Article V, §10(a) of the Pennsylvania Constitution, the Honorable 

Thomas King Kistler is hereby appointed acting President Judge of the Twenty-eighth 

Judicial District, Venango County, effective November 22, 2021, until further Order of this 

Court.
GEHL COMPANY
                            2003 INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN


     The purpose of the Gehl Company (the "Company") 2003 Incentive Bonus Plan
("Plan") is to provide a system of incentive compensation which will reward
participants for achieving Company net income and asset reduction targets, as
well as their personal / departmental goals. This Plan supercedes and replaces
the SVA Management Incentive Compensation Plan dated December 15, 1995.

     All exempt employees shall be considered participants in the Plan, and each
participant will be assigned a target bonus based upon a percentage of their
annual salary, which in most cases will be similar to the target bonus
percentage assigned to the participant under the former SVA Management Incentive
Compensation Plan dated December 15, 1995.

     Any bonus payable under the Plan will be paid after the 2003 fiscal results
are finalized by the Company's auditors and approved by the Company's Audit
Committee. Participants must be employed by the Company on the date the bonuses
are paid. If a participant voluntarily leaves the Company's employ for reasons
other than retirement, or is terminated prior to the date the bonuses are paid,
the participant will be ineligible to receive any bonus.

     The Plan shall be effective for the 2003 fiscal year and may be modified or
terminated by the Board of Directors at its sole discretion. It is the intent of
the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors to review the
Plan annually and adjust the targets consistent with the Company's overall
business and strategic plan objectives.

     The Bonus Pool components are as follows:

          Net Income                         70%
          Asset Reduction                    20%
          Individual / Department Goals      10%

     A full (100%) payout occurs when the assigned net income and asset
reduction targets for the year are met and the participant meets the individual
/ departmental goals. Above and below the 100% Plan target is a 20% band: 80%
minimum threshold, 120% maximum; the same for both net income and asset
reduction, as well as individual performance.

     The Net Income and Asset Reduction targets for 2003 shall be determined by
the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors.

     Any extraordinary event such as the sale of assets not in the ordinary
course of business or extraordinary gains or losses shall not be taken into
account in computing actual net income and asset reduction for 2003. The
components of asset reduction are wholesale and retail receivables, fixed
assets, inventories and current liabilities.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 84

To make a technical correction with respect to the Albert Einstein

Congressional Fellowship Program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 30, (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Mr. HATFIELD (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To make a technical correction with respect to the Albert

Einstein Congressional Fellowship Program.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

3 Senate Resolution 239 of the One Hundred Second

4 Congress (agreed to on November 27, 1991) is amended

5 in section 4(e)(2) by striking ‘‘at not to’’ and all that fol6 lows through ‘‘6(a)’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited consolidated financial statements for the nine month period
ended september 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,963
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,577
<ALLOWANCES>                                       426
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,019
<PP&E>                                          49,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,869
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,381
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,414
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   285
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    948
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                948
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       948
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 37

Concerning the 28th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 9, 1995

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the 28th anniversary of the reunification of

Jerusalem.

Whereas for 3000 years Jerusalem has been the focal point

of Jewish religious devotion;

Whereas Jerusalem is also considered a holy city by the members of other religious faiths;

Whereas the once thriving Jewish majority of the historic Old

City of Jerusalem was driven out by force during the

1948 Arab-Israeli War;

Whereas from 1948 to 1967 Jerusalem was a divided city

and Israeli citizens of all faiths as well as Jewish citizens

of all states were denied access to holy sites in the area

controlled by Jordan;

Whereas in 1967 Jerusalem was reunited during the conflict

known as the Six Day War;
2

•HCON 37 IH

Whereas since 1967 Jerusalem has been a united city administered by Israel and persons of all religious faiths have

been guaranteed full access to holy sites within the city;

Whereas this year marks the 28th year that Jerusalem has

been administered as a unified city in which the rights

of all faiths have been respected and protected;

Whereas in 1990 the United States Senate and House of

Representatives overwhelmingly adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution 106 and House Concurrent Resolution

290 declaring that Jerusalem, the capital of Israel,

‘‘must remain an undivided city’’;

Whereas subsequent statements by the Government of the

United States, including support for United Nations Security Council Resolutions 681 and 726, have raised understandable concern in Israel that Jerusalem might one

day be redivided and access to religious sites in Jerusalem denied to Israeli citizens of all faiths and Jewish citizens of other states; and

Whereas such concerns inhibit and complicate the search for

a lasting peace in the region: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the residents of Jerusalem

4 and the people of Israel on the 28th anniversary of

5 the reunification of that historic city;

6 (2) strongly believes that Jerusalem must re7 main an undivided city in which the rights of every

8 ethnic and religious group are protected as they

9 have been by Israel during the past 28 years; and
3

•HCON 37 IH

1 (3) calls upon the President and the Secretary

2 of State to issue an unequivocal statement in sup3 port of paragraphs (1) and (2).

Æ
§ 1.955-0 Effective dates. ( a ) *Section 955 as in effect before the enactment of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975* — ( 1 ) *In general.* In general, §§ 1.955-1 through 1.955-6 are applicable with respect to withdrawals of previously excluded subpart F income from qualified investment in less developed countries for taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 1962, and to taxable years of United States shareholders (as defined in section 951(b)) within which or with which such taxable years of such foreign corporations end. However, such sections are effective with respect to withdrawals of amounts invested in less developed country shipping companies described in section 955(c)(2) (as in effect before the enactment of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975) only for taxable years of foreign corporations beginning before January 1, 1976, and for taxable years of United States shareholders (as defined in section 951(b)) within which or with which such taxable years of such foreign corporations end. For rules applicable to withdrawals of amounts invested in less developed country shipping companies described in section 955(c)(2) (as in effect before such enactment), in taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 1975, see section 955(b)(5) (as amended by such Act) and §§ 1.955A-1 through 1.955A-4.
( 2 ) *References.* Except as otherwise provided therein, all references contained in §§ 1.955-1 through 1.955-6 to section 954 or 955 or to the regulations under section 954 are to those sections and regulations as in effect before the enactment of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975. For regulations under section 954 (as in effect before such enactment), see 26 CFR § 1.954-1 through 1.954-5 (Revised as of April 1, 1975). For taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 1975, and for taxable years of United States shareholders (as described in section 951(b)) within which or with which such taxable years of such foreign corporations end, the definitions of less developed countries and less developed country corporations contained in section 902(d) (as amended by such Act) and § 1.902-2 apply for purposes of determining the credit for corporate stockholders in foreign corporations under section 902.
( b ) *Section 955 as amended by the Tax Reduction Act of 1975.* Except as otherwise provided therein, §§ 1.955A-1 through 1.955A-4 are applicable to taxable years of foreign corporations beginning after December 31, 1975, and to taxable years of United States shareholders (as defined in section 951(b)) within which or with which such taxable years of such foreign corporations end.
[T.D. 7893, 48 FR 22508, May 19, 1983, as amended by T.D. 7894, 48 FR 22529, May 19, 1983]