Filed 7/17/14 P. v. Ysaguirre CA2/3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION THREE 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

EUSEBIO YSAGUIRRE, JR., 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 B254419 

 (Los Angeles County 

 Super. Ct. No. VA131973) 

 APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Peter 

Paul Espinoza, Judge. Affirmed. 

 Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant. 

 No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. 
2

 Defendant and appellant, Eusebio Ysaguirre, Jr., appeals from the judgment 

entered following his plea of no contest to making criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422, 

subd. (a))1

 and his admission he previously had suffered a conviction for the serious 

felony of robbery (§ 211) within the meaning of the Three Strikes law (§§ 667, 

subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)) and section 667, subdivision (a). The trial court 

sentenced Ysaguirre to seven years eight months in state prison. We affirm. 

BACKGROUND 

At proceedings held on November 4, 2013, the prosecutor addressed Ysaguirre 

and informed him he had been charged in count 2 of a felony complaint filed 

September 24, 2013 with the crime of “criminal threats, in violation of . . . section 422[,] 

sub[division] (a), a felony.”2

 The prosecutor continued: “There is also a strike alleged. 

Plus there is a five-year prior alleged, making the total on what you’re admitting and 

pleading to a maximum of 11 years in state prison.” The prosecutor then indicated 

Ysaguirre’s counsel had informed her Ysaguirre wished to “plead guilty for the low term 

doubled, because of the strike, for 32 months, plus five years for the five-year prior, 

making [Ysaguirre’s] term seven years, eight months in . . . state prison.” Ysaguirre 

personally indicated that was his understanding of the agreement. 

 After indicating he understood his constitutional rights and the consequences of 

his plea, Ysaguirre indicated he was freely waiving his rights and taking responsibility for 

the consequences, then pled “[n]o contest” to count 2, making criminal threats in 

violation of section 422, subdivision (a), a felony. Ysaguirre then admitted, for purposes 

of the Three Strikes law and the “five-year prior” alleged pursuant to section 667, 

subdivision (a)(1), he had been convicted of robbery in violation of section 211 on 

February 24, 2004. 

 

1

 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated. 

2

 Ysaguirre apparently entered his plea at the same proceedings as a codefendant, 

Jeffrey Garcia. Garcia pled no contest to second degree commercial burglary in violation 

of section 459 and admitted previously having committed a “strike.” 
3

 After Ysaguirre’s counsel “join[ed] in the waivers, concur[red] with the plea, and 

stipulate[d] to a factual basis [for the plea] based on the police reports,” the trial court 

found Ysaguirre had made “knowing and intelligent” waivers. The court accepted the 

plea and admission, found Ysaguirre guilty of making criminal threats and determined 

the “allegation[] of [a] prior conviction[] to be true.” After dismissing two pending 

misdemeanors, both of which had been for being under the influence of opiates, the trial 

court set sentencing in the present matter for December 18, 2013. 

 At the December 18, 2013 sentencing proceedings, the trial court denied a grant of 

probation. The court sentenced Ysaguirre to state prison for the low term of 16 months 

for his conviction of making criminal threats, then doubled the term to 32 months 

pursuant to the Three Strikes law, after which it “add[ed] a five-year prior that [Ysaguirre 

had] admitted to . . . for a total commitment of seven years and eight months.” The trial 

court granted Ysaguirre presentence custody credit for 91 days actually served and 91 

days of good time/work time, then imposed a $280 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a 

suspended $280 parole revocation restitution fine (§ 1202.45), a $40 court security fee 

(§ 1465.8), and a $30 court operations assessment (Gov. Code, § 70373). 

 Ysaguirre filed a timely notice of appeal on February 14, 2014. His request for a 

certificate of probable cause was denied. After Ysaguirre’s appellate counsel forwarded 

to this court a copy of the request for the certificate of probable cause and supporting 

documents apparently sent to her by Ysaguirre, on April 28, 2014 the Administrative 

Presiding Justice of this court issued an order stating: “This appeal is limited to noncertificate issues.” 

CONTENTIONS 

 After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief which raised no 

issues and requested this court to conduct an independent review of the record. By notice 

filed May 12, 2014, the clerk of this court advised Ysaguirre to submit within 30 days 

any contentions, grounds of appeal or arguments he wished this court to consider. No 

response has been received to date. 
4

REVIEW ON APPEAL 

 We have examined the entire record and are satisfied counsel has complied fully 

with counsel’s responsibilities. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278-284; People 

v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443.) 

DISPOSITION 

 The judgment is affirmed. 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS 

 KITCHING, J. 

We concur: 

 KLEIN, P. J. 

 ALDRICH, J.