alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 02-220V

Filed: August 20, 2015

(Not to be Published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

*

JOSE VALLE and ANDREA VALLE, *

on behalf of their minor child, * Decision on Interim Attorneys’

J.V., a minor, * Fees and Costs

 *

Petitioners, *

*

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *

HUMAN SERVICES *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

DECISION AWARDING INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

HASTINGS, Special Master. 

On March 20, 2002, Petitioners filed a Petition for Vaccine Compensation in the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Program”),1alleging that J.V. was injured by a 

vaccine or vaccines listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. See § 14. On April 16, 2015, the parties 

filed a joint stipulation concerning interim attorney’s fees and costs incurred in this matter. The 

parties’ stipulation requests a total payment of $24,000.00, representing attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Respondent does not object to an award of this amount.

I find that an award of interim attorneys’ fees and costs is appropriate in this case. 

Interim attorneys’ fees and costs are explicitly authorized by the binding precedent of the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Avera v. HHS, 515 F.3d. 1343; Shaw v. HHS, 

609 F.3d 1372, 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (“the Vaccine Act permits [an] award of interim fees and 

costs”); Cloer v. HHS, 675 F.3d 1358, 1361-62 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (“Congress made clear that 

 

1 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 

Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereafter, 

individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act.
2

denying interim attorneys’ fees under the Vaccine Act is contrary to an underlying purpose of the 

Vaccine Act.”). See also Vaccine Rule 13(b). 

The request for interim attorneys’ fees and costs is hereby granted. I find that the 

petition was brought in good faith and upon a reasonable basis, and the amounts requested are

reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award the following attorneys’ fees and costs 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1): 

• a lump sum of $24,000.00, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioners 

 and Petitioners’ counsel, Edward Kraus, on account of services performed 

by counsel’s law firm. 

In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of the 

Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in 

accordance herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ George L. Hastings, Jr.

 George L. Hastings, Jr.

 Special Master

 

2 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. See 

Vaccine Rule 11(a).
Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 30, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00971-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF S.M.U., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 470th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 470-54214-2020 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Molberg, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle 

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness 

Before the Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. In 

the motion, Appellant informs the Court that the parties have settled their disputes, 

and the trial court has approved the parties’ settlement agreement and signed a final 

judgment. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). 

210971F.P05 

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF S.M.U., A 

CHILD 

No. 05-21-00971-CV 

 On Appeal from the 470th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 470-54214-

2020. 

Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness. Justices Molberg and 

Carlyle participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 30th day of December 2022.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00123

- CV

C ULBERSON

- S TOWERS , I NC .; R ICHARD W. S TOWERS J R .; AND C ULBERSON R ENTAL AND L EASING C O ., I NC

. , Appellants

V

.

L EASE C ORPO R ATION OF A MERICA , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Tarrant County ( 2020

- 004176

- 2 )

November 16 , 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and hol ds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Culberson

- Stowers, Inc.; Richard W. Stowers Jr.; and

Culberson Rental and Leasing Co., Inc. shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let

execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel Justice Dabney Bassel
I-90

SD 79

US 16

SD 44

US 385

CUSTER

HILL CITY

Nemo Road

Deerfield Road

US 16A

US 385

US 385

Mystic Road

RAPID CITY

SD 40

Map 1 - Pactola Project Area

Vicinity Map

SILVER

CITY

FSR 231

FSR 208

Legend

Project Area

Pactola Reservoir

Highways

County Roads

Pactola

Reservoir

ROCHFORD

0 2 4 8

®

Miles Map by R. Rick
§ 1.669(b)-1 Information requirements. The election of a beneficiary who is a U.S. person to apply the limitations on tax provided in section 669(a) shall not be effective unless the beneficiary, at or before the time the election is made, supplies, in a letter addressed to the district director for the internal revenue district in which the taxpayer files his return (or the Director of International Operations where appropriate), or in a statement attached to his return, the following information with respect to the operation and accounts of the foreign trust created by a U.S. person for each of the preceding taxable years, on the last day of which an amount is deemed distributed under section 666(a): ( a ) The gross income of the trust: The gross income should be separated to show the amount of each type of income received by the trust and to identify its source. For example, the beneficiary should list separately, by type (dividends, rents, capital gains, taxable interest, exempt interest, etc.) and source (name and country of payor), each item of income included in the gross income of the trust. For this purpose, the gross income of the trust includes gross income from U.S. sources which is exempt from taxation under section 894.
( b ) The amount of tax withheld under section 1441 by the United States on income from sources within the United States.
( c ) The amount of the tax paid to each foreign country by the trust.
( d ) The expenses of the trust attributable to each type of income disclosed in paragraph (b) of this section, and the general expenses of the trust.
( e ) The distributions, if any, made by the trust to the beneficiaries (including those who are not U.S. persons). These distributions should be separated into amounts of income required to be distributed currently within the meaning of section 661(a)(1), and any other amounts properly paid, credited, or required to be distributed within the meaning of section 661(a)(2).
( f ) Any other information which is necessary for the computation of tax on the accumulation distribution as provided in section 669(a).
( g ) If the foreign trust created by a U.S. person is less than the entire foreign trust, the information listed in paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section shall also be furnished with respect to that portion of the entire foreign trust which is not a foreign trust created by a U.S. person.
[T.D. 6989, 34 FR 740, Jan. 17, 1969]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                   OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Fred L. Holliger, Chief Executive Officer of Giant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Giant.


                             By: /s/ FRED L. HOLLIGER
                                --------------------------------
                             Name:   Fred L. Holliger
                             Title:  Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 11, 2004.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 141 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 141

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for the adjournment of the two Houses.
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 141

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
February 1, 1996, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, 
February 26, 1996, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, February 1, 1996, 
Tuesday, February 6, 1996, Wednesday, February, 7, 1996, Thursday, 
February 8, 1996, Tuesday, February 13, 1996, Wednesday, February 14, 
1996, or Thursday, February 15, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this resolution, it 
stand recessed or adjourned until 3 p.m. on Monday, February 26, 1996, 
or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interst shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 160) IV-C-12

7 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:59AM Sheet 160of 232P.2

^*" > P ^ v i UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y 

# J Z 

# -c - 12 7
AN N ARBOR
. MICHIGA N 4810 5
OFFIC E O F AI R AN O RADIATIO N 

### SE P 

## I 198

8

Mr . Marce l Halberstad t Moto r Vehicl e Manufacturer s Associatio n 30 0 Ne wCente r Buildin g Detroit , M I 4820 2
Dea r Mr . Halberstadt : O nJun e 30 , 198 8 EP Ahel da publi c worksho p o nth e propose d tes t procedure s fo r evaporativ e andrefuelin g emissio n whic hhad accompanyin g it s refuelin g an dvolatilit yNPRMs . A t tha t worksho p w e describe dsevera l change s t o th e propose d procedure s designe d t o simplif yth e refuelin g tes t andt o insur e tha t non-integrate drefuelin g control s o r evaporative-onl ycontrol s woul d hav e equivalen t in-us e performanc e t o integrate d refuelin g contro l systems . Enclose d fo r you r revie wi s a copyo f draf t regulation s embodyin g th e change s describe d a t th e workshop , plu s othe r lesse r change s resultin g fro mEPA' s revie wo f tes t procedur e comments . Thes e regulation s wil l giv e yo u ful l detail s o f th e change s whic hw e ar e anticipatin g fo r ou r upcomin g reproposa l action . I f yo u hav e anyquestions , pleas e contac t Pete r Hutchin s o f m

ystaf f a t (313 ) 668-4340 . T o assis t i nou r incorporatio no f you r view s o nthes e draf t regulation s int o ou r reproposal , w e reques t tha t yo u suppl yu s you r comment s b yn o later"tha nSeptembe r 15 , 1988 . Sincerel yyours^ , i 0\^uuiA^ ••' *s'~*-y >-\ .. . Charle s L . Gray' , --Jr . Directo r Amissio nContro l Technolog yDivisio n Enclosur e cc: Docke t A-87-1 1 6 309 WP. 3



# * NV 

# '»°<^

'&NT, 

## ceNrn

## „ ^ 

## % S-by^CKFT •-'i\l -' 'Or

V
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-4597
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DREW ELLIOTT MCGILL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00204-WLO) Submitted: January 9, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas N. Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Michael A. DeFranco, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Drew Elliott McGill pled guilty to one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B), (b)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). On appeal, he challenges the district court’s imposition of the statutory maximum sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment. We affirm. We find that the district court properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines and considered the relevant sentencing factors before imposing the 120-month sentence. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). Additionally, we find that the sentence imposed was reasonable. See United States v. Johnson , 445 F.3d 339, 341 (4th Cir. 2006); Rita v. United States , 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-69 (2007) (upholding presumption of reasonableness accorded within-guidelines sentence). Accordingly, we affirm McGill’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1.863-3AT Income from the sale of personal property derived partly from within and partly from without the United States (temporary regulations). ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Income partly from sources within a foreign country.* ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) *Allocation or apportionment.* Example 1. [Reserved]
Example 2. (i) Where an independent factory or production price has not been established as provided under *Example* (1), the gross income derived from the sale of personal property produced (in whole or in part) by the taxpayer within the United States and sold within a foreign country or produced (in whole or in part) by the taxpayer within a foreign country and sold within the United States shall be computed. (ii) Of this gross amount, one-half shall be apportioned in accordance with the value of the taxpayer's property within the United States and within the foreign country, the portion attributable to sources within the United States being determined by multiplying such one-half by a fraction, the numerator of which consists of the value of the taxpayer's property within the United States and the denominator of which consists of the value of the taxpayer's property both within the United States and within the foreign country. The remaining one-half of such gross income shall be apportioned in accordance with the gross sales of the taxpayer within the United States and within the foreign country, the portion attributable to sources within the United States being determined by multiplying such one-half by a fraction the numerator of which consists of the taxpayer's gross sales for the taxable year or period within the United States, and the denominator of which consists of the taxpayer's gross sales for the taxable year or period both within the United States and within the foreign country. Deductions from gross income that are allocable and apportionable to gross income described in paragraph (i) of this *Example* 2 shall be apportioned between the United States and foreign source portions of such income, as determined under this paragraph (ii), on a pro rata basis, without regard to whether the deduction relates primarily or exclusively to the production of property or to the sale of property.
( b ) (2) *Example* (2)(iii) through (c)(4) [Reserved]
[T.D. 8228, 53 FR 35506, Sept. 14, 1988. Redesignated by T.D. 8687, 61 FR 60545, Nov. 29, 1996]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 5, 2018

NO. 03-18-00502-CV

F. M. J., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the order of termination signed by the trial court on July 12, 2018. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s order of termination. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s order of termination. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
#### § 1.6031(c)-2T Nominee reporting of REMIC information (temporary). [Reserved]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1375** 

In re: HARRY CHARITY, III , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. (1:06

- cr - 00175

- CMH

- 1; 1:13

- cv - 00736

- CMH)

Submitted : October 26, 2016 Decided: November 7, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Harry Charity, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Harry Charity, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion . He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the dist rict court’s docket reveals that the district court ruled on the § 2255 motion, denying it and declining to grant a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Charity ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00084-CR

Glen L. Williams, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 10-1680-K26, HONORABLE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Glen L. Williams filed a notice of appeal from a judgment of conviction for

unauthorized use of a vehicle. However, the trial court certified that: (1) this is a plea bargain case

and Williams has no right of appeal, and (2) Williams waived the right of appeal. Williams and his

counsel signed the certification.

The appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

 

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: August 5, 2011

Do Not Publish
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTank System Integrated Model: A Cryogenic Tank Performance Prediction ProgramAccurate predictions of the thermodynamic state of the cryogenic propellants, pressurization rate, and performance of pressure control techniques in cryogenic tanks are required for development of cryogenic fluid long-duration storage technology and planning for future space exploration missions. This Technical Memorandum (TM) presents the analytical tool, Tank System Integrated Model (TankSIM), which can be used for modeling pressure control and predicting the behavior of cryogenic propellant for long-term storage for future space missions. Utilizing TankSIM, the following processes can be modeled: tank self-pressurization, boiloff, ullage venting, mixing, and condensation on the tank wall. This TM also includes comparisons of TankSIM program predictions with the test data andexamples of multiphase mission calculations.Document ID20170005533Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBolshinskiy, L. G.*(Jacobs Engineering and Science Services and Skills Augmentation Group (ESSSA) Huntsville, AL, United States)*Hedayat, A.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Hastings, L. J.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Sutherlin, S. G.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Schnell, A. R.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Moder, J. P.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 13, 2017Publication DateApril 1, 2017Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberM-1431NASA/TM-2017-218239Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005533.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024