alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Honorable William Jay Riley became Chief Judge of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2010. 

2

The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-2574

___________

Joshua Ray Puffinbarger, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of *

Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: March 24, 2010

Filed: April 30, 2010

___________

Before RILEY,1

 Chief Judge, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Ray Puffinbarger appeals the district court’s2

 order affirming the denial

of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Puffinbarger

alleged disability from, among other things, arthritis, herniated discs in his neck and

back, and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). After a hearing, an administrative law judge
-2-

(ALJ) determined that (1) Puffinbarger’s combined impairments--degenerative disc

disease, CTS, diabetes, hypertension, depression, personality disorder, and history of

kidney stones and rotator-cuff injury--were severe, but did not meet or equal the

requirements of any listing alone or combined; (2) his subjective complaints were not

entirely credible; and (3) based on the testimony of a vocational expert, Puffinbarger’s

residual functional capacity (RFC) did not preclude his past relevant work as an

inspector or security guard. The Appeals Council denied review, and the district court

affirmed. After de novo review of the record, see Davidson v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 838,

841-42 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review), we affirm.

We reject Puffinbarger’s challenges to the ALJ’s credibility findings, as those

findings were based on multiple valid reasons. See Finch v. Astrue, 547 F.3d 933,

935-36 (8th Cir. 2008) (where ALJ explicitly discredits claimant and gives good

reasons for doing so, courts will normally defer to his judgment); see also Gowell v.

Apfel, 242 F.3d 793, 796 (8th Cir. 2001) (real issue is severity of claimant’s pain).

We also find that the ALJ’s determination of Puffinbarger’s physical RFC is

supported by substantial evidence. See Moore v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 520, 523 (8th Cir.

2009) (considerations in RFC determination); Goff v. Barnhart, 421 F.3d 785, 790

(8th Cir. 2005) (burden is on claimant to establish RFC).

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   39,139
<SECURITIES>                                          1,600,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                         1,666,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                            251,460
<INVENTORY>                                             143,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      3,258,886
<PP&E>                                                  399,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                          168,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        5,028,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 4,642,210
<BONDS>                                                  27,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  5,765
<OTHER-SE>                                             (353,225)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          5,028,725
<SALES>                                               4,774,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      4,774,099
<CGS>                                                   631,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4,789,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      346,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (199,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (199,224)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (199,224)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.01)


</TABLE>
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0264 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM244AD

A300 - 28 - 6068 --- 7/20/05 A300 - 28 - 6077 , R0 1 --- 10/26/06

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Loading

×Sorry to interrupt
Refresh
|US
    Bank(logo) | All
    of us serving you
|----------------- | -------------------------





Annual Statement of Compliance

Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Trust 2015-C25



VIA: EMAIL



Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.

One Bryant Park

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Leland F. Bunch, III

leland.f.bunch@baml.com



Eightfold Real Estate Capital, L.P.

1111 Lincoln Road, Suite 802

Miami Beach, Florida 33139

Attention: Brian Tageson

btageson@eightfoldcapital.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com



Re:	      Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015
(the “Agreement”) between Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special
Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator,
Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian.



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President
of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:



(1) A review of the activities
of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date: March 7, 2017



|U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|By:                                                         
|                                                            
|
PUBLIC LAW 115–42—JUNE 27, 2017 131 STAT. 883 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1083: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

May 11, considered and passed Senate. 

May 25, considered and passed House, amended. 

June 14, Senate concurred in House amendment. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–42 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend section 1214 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for stays during 

a period that the Merit Systems Protection Board lacks a quorum. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STAYS BY MSPB DURING PERIODS WITH NO QUORUM. 

Section 1214(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ before ‘‘The Board may’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ii) If the Board lacks the number of members appointed 

under section 1201 required to constitute a quorum, any remaining 

member of the Board who was appointed, by and with the advice 

and consent of the Senate, may, upon request by the Special 

Counsel, extend the period of any stay granted under subparagraph 

(A).’’. 

Approved June 27, 2017. 

June 27, 2017 

[S. 1083]
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Michael L. Middleton, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-County Financial Corporation,certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tri-County FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board or directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: August 12, 2005 /s/ Michael L. Middleton     Michael L. Middleton
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title: Emergingpowers and future threats : implications for the U.S. and global defenseindustry
 
PDF | MOBI | EPUB
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146/3:EM 3
Item Number:0307-A-18 (online)
CGP System Number:001020307
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 25, 2017********
IV

★

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 11

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the expression of selfdetermination by the people of Puerto Rico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SERRANO submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations and, in addition, to

the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the

expression of self-determination by the people of Puerto Rico.

Whereas the people of Puerto Rico are natural-born citizens

of the United States but do not enjoy all of the individual

rights and liberties accorded to other American citizens

under the United States Constitution;

Whereas the future status of Puerto Rico remains under discussion among residents of the Island of Puerto Rico and

among Puerto Ricans residing in the 50 States of the

United States; and

Whereas the Charter of the United Nations, a treaty to which

the United States is a signatory, expresses the right of

self-determination, that is the right of a people to decide
2

HCON 11 IH1S

for themselves the political status under which they live:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) reaffirms the commitment of the people of

4 the United States to the principle of self-determina5 tion;

6 (2) reasserts the principle, first articulated by

7 the Congress in its ratification of the Charter of the

8 United Nations, that with respect to territories

9 whose peoples have not yet attained a full measure

10 of self-government, the interests of the inhabitants

11 of such territories are paramount; and

12 (3) endorses the right of the people of Puerto

13 Rico to political self-determination.

Æ
III

★(Star Print)

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 108

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 19 (legislative day, OCTOBER 18), 1995

Received

OCTOBER 23, 1995

Referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill

H.R. 1594.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 1594) to place restrictions on the promotion by the De4 partment of Labor and other Federal agencies and instru5 mentalities of economically targeted investments in con6 nection with employee benefit plans, the Clerk of the

7 House of Representatives shall, in section 5 of the bill,

8 strike ‘‘Nothing’’ and all that follows through the end of

9 such section and insert the following: ‘‘Nothing in this Act

10 is intended to affect the ability of the Department of

11 Labor to issue advisory opinions, information letters, tech-
2

HCON 108 RFS1S

1 nical releases, prohibited transaction exemptions, or other

2 pronouncements interpreting and applying the fiduciary

3 responsibility rules of the Employee Retirement Income

4 Security Act of 1974 in relation to particular factual situ5 ations, or exempting specific transactions from the prohib6 ited transaction provisions of such Act (pursuant to sec7 tions 406 and 408 of such Act (29 U.S.C. 1106, 1108)).’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 24 1 . J EROME I BAMBASI v . ENATHA I BAMBASI

.

In t h is d o m es t i c rel at i o n s cas e, t h e t ri al co u rt en tered an o rd er on Ju l y 1 4

, 2 0 2 1,

fi n d i n g J e r o m e Ib am

b as i i n co n t em

p t fo r fai l i n g t o p ay p ri o r at t o rn ey fee award s

. Ib am b as i ap p eal ed o n Au g u s t 2 6 , 2 0 2 1 . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct io n fo r t wo reas o n s

. Fi rs t

, a n ot i c e o f a p p eal m u st b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f t h e o rd er

s o u g ht t o b e ap p eal ed

. O CGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). “ Th e p ro p er an d t im el y fi li n g o f a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal i s an ab s o l u t e req ui rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i ct i on u p on an ap p el lat e co u rt .”

Per l ma n v. Per l ma n , 3 1 8 Ga. Ap p

. 7 3 1

, 73 9 (4 ) (7 3 4 SE2 d 5 6 0 ) (2 0 1 2 ) (p u n ct u at i o n

o m it t ed ). Be cau s e Ib am

b as i fi l ed a n ot i ce o f ap p eal 4 3 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e

co n tem p t o rd er, t h i s ap p eal i s u n t i m el y

. Seco n d

, ap p eal s fro m “

ju d g m en t s o r o r d e r s in d iv o rce, al im o n y , an d o t h er

d o m es t ic rel at i o n s c a s e s ” m us t b e m ad e b y ap pl i cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ); acco rd Vo yl es v. Vo

yl es , 3 0 1 Ga. 4 4

, 4 7 (7 9 9 SE2 d 1 6 0 )
(2 0 1 7) (an ap p eal i n a d om es ti c rel at i on s cas e in wh i ch cu s t o d y i s n o t at i s s u e m

u s t

b e b ro u g h t b y d i s cret i o nary ap p l i cat i o n ). “ [C] om p l i an ce wi t h t h e d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal s p ro ced u re i s ju ri s d i ct i o n al .” Fa b e v. Fl o yd

, 1 9 9 G a. Ap p

. 3 2 2

, 3 3 2 (1 ) (4 0 5

SE2 d 2 6 5 ) (1 9 9 1 ). Ib am

b as i ’ s fai l u re t o fo l lo w t h e d i s cret i o n ary a p p eal p ro ced u re

t h u s d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i on o v er t h i s d i rect ap peal

. December 10, 2021Ap p el l ee En at h a Ib am b as i h as fi l ed a m ot i o n t o d i s m is s t h e ap p eal

. T he m o t i o n

i s GRANTED, an d t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.
W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/10/2021
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE WILLIAM D. GEHL/GEHL COMPANY
                       SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AGREEMENT
                         DATED AS OF DECEMBER 15, 1995.

     THIS AMENDMENT is made by and between Gehl Company ("GEHL"), a Wisconsin
corporation with its principal place of business in West Bend, Wisconsin, and
William D. Gehl, ("Employee") as of April 20, 2000.

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, GEHL and Employee wish to amend the Supplemental Retirement
Agreement between the parties dated as of December 15, 1995.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

     Section 2, Supplemental Retirement Benefits (a) (i) shall be revised to
read as follows:  sixty percent (60%) of the Employee's Average Monthly
Compensation, less . . .

     Section 3, Pre-Retirement Death Benefit (c) shall be revised to read as
follows:  The amount of each of the ten (10) payments shall be 3.6 times the
Employee's Average Monthly Compensation as of the employee's date of death
(i.e., forty percent (40%) of the Employee's Average Monthly compensation
annualized).

     Section 11, Acceleration shall be added as follows:  In the event that
payment of the benefits provided by Section 2 hereunder is accelerated in a
present value payment pursuant to the Change in Control Section of the
Employee's Employment Agreement, all other benefits and provisions hereof
shall be deemed terminated.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GEHL has caused this Agreement to be executed by its
duly authorized officers, and Employee has hereunto set his hand, all as of
the date set forth above.

                              GEHL COMPANY


                              ___________________________________
                              Its Director


                              ___________________________________
                              Employee
-82 -80 -78 -76

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/27

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

Solely for the purposes of complying
with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas M. Rettler, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, of Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge, that:

| | (1) | the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30,
          2007 (the Quarterly Report) to which this statement is an exhibit
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities           Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Gehl Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 6, 2007

| | /s/ William D. Gehl  
| | ---------------------
| | William D. Gehl      
| | /s/ Thomas M. Rettler
| | Thomas M. Rettler