alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 189

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of United States membership and participation

in regional South Pacific organizations.

Whereas the United States and the South Pacific region

enjoy a close and historic partnership built on a strong

foundation of shared values and an unshakable commitment to democracy, development, and human rights;

Whereas the Pacific Island Nations and Governments, together with New Zealand and Australia, share many of

the global objectives of the United States, including the

nonproliferation of nuclear weapons, the protection of
2

HCON 189 RDS

unique ecosystems, and sustainable economic development

consistent with good resource management practices;

Whereas the United States, through support of the EastWest Center in Hawaii, has facilitated establishment of

the Pacific Islands Conference, wherein the heads of Pacific Island governments have met triennially to target

critical research in furtherance of the region’s trade, environment, and development; and

Whereas the United States is a member of the regional economic and social development body, the South Pacific

Commission, participates in and plans to become a party

to the regional environmental body, the South Pacific Regional Environment Program, as well as being a dialogue

partner for the regional political body, the South Pacific

Forum: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the traditional and close ties be4 tween the United States and the South Pacific re5 gion and reaffirms the value of these ties;

6 (2)(A) notes the need to continue to support

7 the efforts of the nations and governments of the re8 gion to enhance the sustainable development of the

9 more fragile island economies and their integration

10 into the regional economy, while helping to ensure

11 the protection of the unique ecosystems of the re12 gion; and
3

HCON 189 RDS

1 (B) recognizes the efforts of the East-West

2 Center and Pacific Islands Conference in further3 ance of the efforts described in subparagraph (A);

4 (3) commends the South Pacific Commission

5 for the process of managerial and organizational re6 form currently being undertaken, and recognizes the

7 important role the United States financial contribu8 tion to, and participation in, the organization makes

9 in assisting it to realize the gradual economic self10 sufficiency to all members of the organization; and

11 (4) reaffirms the commitment of the United

12 States as a member of the South Pacific Commis13 sion and a participant in the South Pacific Regional

14 Environment Programme, and a member of the

15 post-Forum dialogue partnership of the United

16 States with the South Pacific Forum.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 211 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 211

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a technical 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3060.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3060) to implement the 
Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty, the Clerk 
of the House of Representatives shall make the following technical 
correction: In section 201(a)(1) strike ``paragraphs (1) through (9) of 
subsection (a) as paragraphs (3) through (11)'' and insert in lieu 
thereof ``paragraphs (1) through (10) of subsection (a) as paragraphs 
(3) through (12)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
SHELBY COUNTY 

HEALTH DEPARTMENT 

MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR. jANET L. SHIPMAN, J.D. HELEN MORROW, M.D., M.P.A. Public Health 

MAYOR INTERIM DIRECTOR HEALTH OFFICER 

CERTIFIED MAIL# 7002 2030 0003 5399 2931 

November 5, 2015 

Heather McTeer Toney, Regional Administrator 

EPA Region4 

61 Forsyth Street SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303 

Dear Ms. Toney, 

Prll'VI!nt. Promote. Pr.:~t.,ct. 

In accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.102, this serves as notice of the scheduling of 

a public hearing to receive comments on proposed amendments to the state implementation plan. 

Copies of the proposed SIP amendment are available for public inspection at the SCHD office 

during normal business hours and an electronic copy of the proposal along with all technical 

support docwnents can be found at the following ftp site: 

ht!ps://xfer.shelbvcountvtn.gov/ 

The usemame and password are both 'public'. 

A public hearing regarding this matter has been scheduled at the SCHD Auditorium at 814 

Jefferson Avenue Memphis, TN on December 15,2015 at 5:30pm. 

Please feel free to contact me if you have any question regarding this matter. 

Respectfully, 

1?~/2?~ 

Robert Rogers, P .E., Manager 

Pollution Control 

Mission 

To promote, protect and improve the health and environment of all Shelby County residents. 

814 Jefferson Avenue + Memphis, Tennessee 38105 

(901) 222·9000
212-896-5160 

To: 

From: 

Subject: 

ARTHURJ. VIVIANI 

33-16157TH STREET 

FLUSHING, N.Y. 11354 

718-762-3412 

Email: aviviani@cbs-collins.com 

08:19:17a.m. 11-05-2014 

November 5, 2014 

(VIA FAX ONLY TO 202-493-2251) 

Docket Operation M-30 

U.S. Dept. Trans. 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Room W 12-140 

West Building Ground Floor 

Washington D.C., 20590-0001 

Arthur J. Viviani 

Docket Number FAA-2014-0510 Implementation of Catex Porcedures. 

I am a member of Queens Quiet Skies and file this comment after October 20 but before 

_November 10, 2014, since I had to review the FAA's position on the above Subject since that 

position was delayed in being published on the internet. 

I oppose the use of the Net Noise Reduction Method to measure reductions in noise per 

flight since it results in shifting noise among different residential areas. Moreover, it is based 

on day/night noise levels, a method not intended for measuring noise per each flight. In 

addition, it will increase noise for numerous residents from concentrated flights while 

decreasing it for others. I do not want others to feel the torture we have felt for the past 2 

years. 

As to the remaining 3 questions (3, 4 and 5) in your implementation plan, 1 accept the 

position of Queens Quiet Skies, previously filed with the FAA, as though fully stated here. 

111
Pat McCrory 

Governor 

Heather McTeer Toney 

Regional Administrator 

USEP A Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 

June 26, 2015 

Donald R. van der Vaart 

Secretary 

Subject: Recession ofNorth Carolina's September 3, 2014, Withdrawal of2008 Ozone 

Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Certification Pertaining to Interstate 

Transport (Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)) 

Dear Ms. Toney: 

On November 2, 2012, North Carolina submitted its certification demonstrating that the North 

Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Air Quality (NC DAQ) 

had met the requirements ofthe Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(1) and (2) infrastructure State 

Implementation Plan for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. North 

Carolina's submittal demonstrated compliance with all requirements including the good neighbor 

provision. NC DAQ believes modeling performed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) would have supported our conclusion; however, that modeling was not yet available. 

Subsequently, in August 2014, EPA informed NC DAQ that it intended to disapprove this 

submittal because it did not include a modeling demonstration. Therefore, on September 3, 

2014, North Carolina requested withdrawal of the Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) portion of the 

submittal pending availability of EPA's modeling. 

On January 22, 2015, EPA's preliminary air quality modeling results became available which 

supported NC DAQ's November 2, 2012 submittal that demonstrated North Carolina does not 

significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the standard in a 

neighboring state. 

Therefore, North Carolina believes it has met its obligations under Section 11 O(a)(1) and (2) 

related to interstate transport. North Carolina rescinds its September 3, 2014, withdrawal and 

therefore, does not expect to receive a finding of failure to submit. 

1641 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641 

Phone: 919-707-8400 I lnternei: www.ncdenr.gov 

An Equal Opportunity \Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paper 
Heather McTeer Toney 

June 26,2015 

Page2 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (919) 707-8430. 

SCH/ssm 

cc: Michael Abraczinskas, DAQ 

Sushma Masemore, DAQ 

Scott Davis, EPA 

Lynorae Benjamin, EPA 

Sincerely, 

Sheila C. Holman 

Division of Air Quality, NCDENR 

Leslie Rhodes, Mecklenburg County Air Quality 

William Barnette, Forsyth County Office of Environmental Assistance and Protection 

David Brigman, Western Regional Air Quality Agency
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,030,949
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,356,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,386,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          427,195
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,959,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,386,968
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,190
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               54,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                144,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   144,903
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 154 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 154

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 1996

      Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
To congratulate the Republic of China on Taiwan on the occasion of its 
first direct and democratic presidential election and the inauguration 
                           of its president.

    Whereas March 23, 1996, was the first time in the history of the 
            Republic of China on Taiwan that a presidential election 
            was held through direct popular vote by the people of 
            Taiwan;
    Whereas the election was held under great difficulties caused by 
            extensive military threats from the People's Republic of 
            China; and
    Whereas the presidential inauguration will be held on May 20, 1996, 
            and should be honored: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) the Congress congratulates the people of Taiwan on 
        holding their first direct and democratic presidential 
        election;
            (2) the United States continues its commitment to move 
        nations toward freedom and democracy; and
            (3) the United States is committed to encouraging and 
        protecting its democratic friends on Taiwan, within the 
        framework of the Taiwan Relations Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6169

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus VICTOR JARVIS, a/k/a Vic, a/k/a V, a/k/a Powder Man, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-95-26, CA-99-21-4) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion as time barred. We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jarvis , Nos. CR-95-26; CA-99-21-4 (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Dtfr-oisri^^*'-i^o3 

TOW^ ^ O F SIUV^E R CIT Y BOX uss, SILVERcnr, NEW MEXICO88062» (575) S38.37}i« FAX (575) 538.5123 

February 22, 2011 

^'.0 

•- I 

' o j 

} > 

c5 

— 

f ' ~ 1- " 

.--6^^'^. 

ni^r n 

^ ^ 5 

09^ 

•:/:: 

-O 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis, Room 6401 

Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Docket Nos. OST 1996-1902/1903 

Essential Air Service Silver City 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Afler much consideration of the competing proposals for essential air service between Silver 

City and Albuquerque, New Mexico, it is the position of the Town of Silver City that retaining 

the status quo with Great Lakes Aviation is in the best interest of the Town. 

At this time and with regard to the other applicant, the Town is not in favor of granting waivers 

which would obviate the current right of the Town to service with twin-engine, 15 passenger, 

pressurized aircraft. 

Very truly yours. 

JanjKs R. Marshall 

Mayor, Town of Silver City, New Mexico
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 248 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 248

 To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the 
          name of the Senate in United States v. Durenberger.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              August 13 (legislative day, August 11), 1994

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the 
          name of the Senate in United States v. Durenberger.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Durenberger, No. 94-3105, pending on 
        appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 
        Columbia Circuit, the powers and responsibilities of Congress and the 
        relationship among the branches of government have been placed in issue; 
        and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(c), 706(a), and 713(a) of the Ethics in 
        Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(c), 288e(a), and 288l(a) (1988), 
        the Senate may direct its Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the name 
        of the Senate in any legal action which places in issue the powers and 
        responsibilities of Congress under the Constitution: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to appear as 
amicus curiae in the name of the Senate in United States v. 
Durenberger, for the limited purpose of requesting the Court to give 
plenary consideration to the contentions of the United States and 
Senator Durenberger in regard to the separation of powers questions 
presented by the appeal.
                                 <all>
```
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. ZJj) ,:(~ -2 p 2: 5 Ll 

Motion of 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

DOT-OST-1996-1203 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FO~ 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent 

to: 

FRANCIS C. HEIL 

Managing Director -

Legal and Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5642 

francis.heil@aa.com 

March 30, 2015 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D . C . 

Motion of 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

DOT-OST-1996-1203 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby 

moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 4Q2014, be accorded 

confidential treatment and withheld from public disclosure. 

The information for which confidential treatment is requested 

pertains to American's airframe and aircraft engine 

acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report 

electronically to http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov 

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted 

confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data 

filed by American. For the reasons stated in that letter, the 

current submission should also receive confidential treatment 

for 10 years. 
2 -

WHEREFORE, American moves that the schedule being 

submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be 

withheld from public disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 

10 years. 

March 30, 2015 

Respectfully submitted, 

Francis C. Heil 

Managing Director -

Legal and Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc.
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

December 13, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

03-60609 Summary Calendar

FELIPE GUILLERMO PENA LAVERDE,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA No. A79 470 556)

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Felipe Guillermo Pena Laverde petitions f or review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen

and for reconsideration of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision.

The IJ denied Laverde’s application for asylum and withholding of

removal. Laverde contends the IJ erred because there was

unequivocal evidence that he will be persecuted due to his

membership in a particular social group if he is returned to

Colombia.2

Laverde’s petition for review was timely only as to, and

sought review only of, the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen and

for reconsideration. See Stone v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 395 (1995).

Accordingly, we have jurisdiction t o review only whether BIA’s

denial was an abuse of discretion. S ee Karimian-Kaklaki v. INS

,

997 F.2d 108, 113 (5th Cir. 1993).

Laverde has not addressed the reasons advanced in th e BIA’s

denial of his motion to reopen and for reconsideration. Review of

this issue is, therefore, waived. S ee Soadjede v. Ashcroft

, 324

F.3d 830, 832 (5th Cir. 2003); see also Brinkmann v. Dallas County

Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

DENIED