alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 229 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 229

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make corrections in the 
                         enrollment of S. 1004.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 229

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill S. 1004, the Secretary of the 
Senate shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 1106(c), in the text added to section 5 of 
        the Act of January 2, 1951--
                    (A) strike ``This section does not prohibit, nor 
                may any State make'' and insert in lieu thereof ``With 
                respect to a vessel operating in Alaska, this section 
                does not prohibit, nor may the State of Alaska make'';
                    (B) strike ``except that a State may'' and insert 
                in lieu thereof ``except that such State may''; and
                    (C) strike paragraph (2) and insert in lieu thereof 
                the following:
    ``(2) A voyage referred to in paragraph (1) is a voyage that--
            ``(A) includes a stop in Canada or in a State other than 
        the State of Alaska;
            ``(B) includes stops in at least 2 different ports situated 
        in the State of Alaska; and
            ``(C) is of at least 60 hours duration.''.
            (2) In section 1113(d), in the text added to section 12106 
        of title 46, United States Code, in subsection (e)(1)(E) strike 
        ``section 12102'' and insert in lieu thereof ``this section''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 1.167(a)-9 Obsolescence.

The depreciation allowance includes an allowance for normal obsolescence which should be taken into account to the extent that the expected useful life of property will be shortened by reason thereof. Obsolescence may render an asset economically useless to the taxpayer regardless of its physical condition. Obsolescence is attributable to many causes, including technological improvements and reasonably foreseeable economic changes. Among these causes are normal progress of the arts and sciences, supersession or inadequacy brought about by developments in the industry, products, methods, markets, sources of supply, and other like changes, and legislative or regulatory action. In any case in which the taxpayer shows that the estimated useful life previously used should be shortened by reason of obsolescence greater than had been assumed in computing such estimated useful life, a change to a new and shorter estimated useful life computed in accordance with such showing will be permitted. No such change will be permitted merely because in the unsupported opinion of the taxpayer the property may become obsolete. For rules governing the allowance of a loss when the usefulness of depreciable property is suddenly terminated, see § 1.167(a)-8. If the estimated useful life and the depreciation rates have been the subject of a previous agreement, see section 167(d) and § 1.167(d)-1.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3862EA

_____________

Carrie Woods Gray, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

City of Helena; Joann Smith, *

Individually and in her official capacity * [UNPUBLISHED]

as Mayor, *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: April 17, 1998

Filed: April 22, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Carrie Woods Gray appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary

judgment on Gray's race-based employment discrimination claim. Having reviewed the

record and the materials submitted by the parties, we see no error by the district court.

We also conclude that an extended discussion is unnecessary in this fact-intensive case.

We believe the district court is correct, and we affirm on the basis of the district court's

memorandum opinion and order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             8,863
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       80,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 186,019
<PP&E>                                           492,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                   169,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   554,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            127,346
<BONDS>                                          274,108
<COMMON>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     554,731
<SALES>                                          225,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 225,134
<CGS>                                            177,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    215,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (2,731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (1,099)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1,632)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,632)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.17)


</TABLE>
Neuroinvasive

Encephalitis / Meningitis Fever Unspecified Clinical

1999 1 59 3 62 7

2000 3 19 2 21 2

2001 10 64 2 33 9

2002 40 2946 1160 50 4516 284

2003 46 2866 6830 166 9862 264

2004 41 1142 1269 128 2539 100

2005 44 1294 1607 99 3000 119

2006 44 1459 2616 194 4269 177

2007 43 1130 2215 59 3404 98

2008 46 687 624 45 1356 44

According to CDC, the counts of neuroinvasive WNV are more accurate than fever or other clinical symptoms for the 

entire range of this time period. 

Cases of West Nile Virus in the U.S. 

Data from CDC Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases

Year Number of States Total Deaths

Non-neuroinvasive

Cases of Neuroinvasive West Nile Virus in the U.S. 1999 - 2008

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

# of cases

Deaths from West Nile Virus in the U.S. 1999-2008

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

# of deaths
# C_2015007EN.01001701.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari (Italy) lodged on 27 October 2014 — Criminal proceedings against Roberto Siddu

(Case C-478/14)

(2015/C 007/22)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Roberto Siddu

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in [Joined Cases C-72/10 and C 77/10 Costa and Cifone [2012] ECR] to be interpreted as precluding a call for tenders for the award of licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past, where that tendering procedure has been launched in order to remedy the consequences of the unlawful exclusion of a certain number of operators from earlier tendering procedures? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in [Joined Cases C-72/10 and C 77/10 Costa and Cifone [2012] ECR] to be interpreted as precluding a call for tenders for the award of licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past, where that tendering procedure has been launched in order to remedy the consequences of the unlawful exclusion of a certain number of operators from earlier tendering procedures?

| 2. | Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Costa and Cifone to be interpreted as precluding the possibility that sufficient justification for the shorter period of validity of licences offered for tender, as compared with licences awarded in the past, can be found in the requirement for the licensing system to be reorganised through the alignment of licence expiry dates? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are Article 49 et seq. TFEU and Article 56 et seq. TFEU and the principles laid down by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Costa and Cifone to be interpreted as precluding the possibility that sufficient justification for the shorter period of validity of licences offered for tender, as compared with licences awarded in the past, can be found in the requirement for the licensing system to be reorganised through the alignment of licence expiry dates?

---
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-5 for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-5 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2017By:

/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 30, 2017
AL DEPOSITO RY LIBRARIES

mation, Dedicated Service, Limitless Possibilities

dicated | Limitless Free | Dedicated | Limitless 

Free Information, Dedicated Service, Limitless Possibilities

EPOSITO RY LIBRARIES

Dedicated Service, Limitless Possibilities

federal depository libraries
The Federal Depository Library Program was established by Congress to ensure that 

the American public has access to its Government’s information. The U.S. Government 

Printing Office (GPO) administers the FDLP on behalf of the participating libraries 

and the public. Information products from the Federal Government are disseminated to 

these nationwide libraries that, in turn, ensure the American public has free access to the 

materials, both in print and online. 

Depositories provide online access to Government information. GPO services are offered 

to help users of all ages find Federal information, and depository librarians provide expert 

assistance in using these online services:

Catalog of U.S. Government Publications http://catalog.gpo.gov

 The finding tool for descriptive records for historic and current publications from the 

Government

 Direct links to online publications

Federal Digital System (FDsys) www.fdsys.gov

 America’s authentic Government information

Ben’s Guide to U.S. Government www.bensguide.gpo.gov

 Resources that teach how Government works

federal depository libraries

WHAT IS A FEDERAL DEPOSITORY LIBRARY? 

Federal Government information is made available for FREE public use in Federal 

depository libraries located throughout the United States and its territories. What’s more, 

SKILLED and knowledgeable librarians are available to assist in their use. 

ANYONE can visit Federal depository libraries and access the collections. 

Find your local Federal depository library today at:

http://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/public.jsp

WHAT CAN I FIND AT A FEDERAL DEPOSITORY LIBRARY?

 Information on topics such as health, business, careers, the military, science, technology, 

travel, nutrition, and more

 Books, maps, microfiche, journals, periodicals, and more

 Historical publications dating back to the early days of the Republic

 Expert reference assistance from Government information librarians

 Access to online Government information resources

 A network of librarians to facilitate access to materials located at other libraries

Learn more about Federal depository libraries at www.gpo.gov/libraries.
Federal depository libraries are located within all types of 

libraries throughout the United States and its territories. 

Find a local Federal depository library near you:

http://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/public.jsp

For additional information, contact the GPO Contact Center:

Toll-Free 866.512.1800

DC Metro 202.512.1800

ContactCenter@gpo.gov

FEDERAL DEPOSITO RY LIBRARIES

Free Information, Dedicated Service, Limitless Possibilities

Free | Dedicated | Limitless Free | Dedicated | Limitless
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3942

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Troy S. Thompson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 6, 2007 Filed: April 12, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Troy S. Thompson appeals the 24-month pr ison sentence that the district court 1 imposed after revoking his probation. We affirm. Specifically, because the revocation sent ence was within authorized limits and the district court considered appr opriate factors in imposing it, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3565(a), we conclude that Thompson’s sentence is not unreasonable, see United States v. Tyson , 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation-2- sentences are reviewed for unreasonablen ess in accordance with United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005)); cf. United States v. Franklin , 397 F.3d 604, 606-07 (8th Cir. 2005) (24-month revocation sent ence, where Guidelines recommended 8-14 months, was not abuse of discretion wher e transcript showed court was aware of defendant’s multiple violations of superv ised-release conditions and of Guidelines range and statutory maximum). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
# NationalArchives andRecordsAdministration Office a/the Federal Register
November 4, 20I0 FAA 800 Independence Avenue, SW Room 915.1, Regulations DivIsion Washington, DC 2059\ ATTN: Nancy Molitor. FA.A. Liaison Officer forthe Federal Register Dear Ms. Molitor: The material1istcd inthe attachment isapproved for incorporation by reference in 14eFR Part 39. This approval iscontingent upon the final rule containing any language changes, which were agreed upon by our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) iseffective 011 the effective date OfYOUf final rule. [fyou wish toenforce some other edition ofthe publication(s) approved, you must: I. Publish notice ofthe change inthe Federal Register. and amend IheCode ofFederal Regulations: and 2. Ensure that acopy of that edition ison file atthe Office ofthe Federal Register: and 3. Notify me in writing orthe change. Sincerely, 

### .{Pu~ 

# j,

# u.-'4 .(l,- RAYMOND A. MOSLEY Director ofthe Fedenll Register federal Register Attorncy:,o!tW 

### Attachment

us. mail address: 8601 Adl'lphi Rood, College Park,. MD 20740-6001

Office location: 800North CapjtolStrecl. NW, Suite 700,Washington,. OC 200024244 Federal Register web sites: http://w,,"w.archlves.gov/fuderal.rcgistcr amf http://w,,,,v.gpo<'lCCe5s.gov/naraIncorporatioll byReferellce Docket No. FAA~2010-0483,- DireclOrate Identifier 2010-NM-U65-AD.- Amendment 39-16501: AD 1010-23-13 Boeing Commercial Airplanes Special Attenliorl Service Bulletin 757~ 57-0070 01127/2010
DockI!I/'/O. FAA-2010-0548; Directorate Identifier 20IO~NM-041-AD: Amendment 39-16·J97; AD 2010-23-08 Bombardier, Inc. Bombardier,lnc_ Service Bulletin 700- 1A11-24-014 Service Bulletin 700- 24-075 Revision 2 Revision 2 03l15f2010 03l15f2010 Duckel No. FAA-2010-0675: Direclorafe Idelll{fier 20/0-NM-061-AD: AlIIl!l1dmr!llf 39-1fi501: AD 20/0-23-12 Airbus A330 and 340 Mandatory Service 01120/2010 Bulielin A330-34-3232, excluding Appendix 01 Airbus A330 and 340 Mandatory Service 01120/2010 Bulletin A340-34-4239, excluding Appendix 01 Airbus A330 and 340 Mandatory Service 01/20/2010 Bulletin A340-34-5072, excluding Appendix 01 Thales Service Bulletin Revision 1 1210312009 C16291A-34-007 Docket No. FAA-2010-0700: Directorale Idemijier 2010-NM-/23-AD. Amendment 39-/6500: AD 2010-23-1 I Bombardier, Inc Alert Service Bulletin Revision A A670BA-27-054 dated01/18t2010 Docket No. FAA-lOlD-07D5; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-206-AD: Amendmeni 39-l6499: AD 2010-23-10 Boeing Service Bulletin De9- Revision 1 57·223 08/13/2009 DockeI.No. FAA-10IO-0870: DireClorale ldelllifier 2010-CE-0-15-AD: AlIIl!mlmem39-16505: AD 2010-23~/6 EMBRAER Phenom

Printed '1/4/20W Service Bulletin 500- 21-0001 1210912009

P(l~e lof2Incorporatioll byReference Docket No. FAA-20ID-II02; Direclorate Identifier 2010-NM-OI6-AD: Amendment 39-16507: AD 2010-23-18 Airbus A380 Mandatory Service Bulletin A380-36-8009, including Service Bulletin Report Sheet 12/0712009

Dockel No. F'AA-201O-1106: Directorate Idl!lIlijier201O-IVM-237-AD: Amendmellt39-16508: AD 2010-23-19 Bombardier, Inc.

Primed 11l4/2(jIO Alert Service Bulletin Revision A A670BA-32-Q30, including Appendix A 1012212010

Page 2of2
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 29229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12500]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Aliante Station, 7300 Aliante Parkway, North Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89084.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Rupp, Board Administrator, 232 
Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 657-
9088; Fax (702) 295-5300 or E-mail: ntscab@nv.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the 
areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related 
activities.
    Tentative Agenda:
    1. Recommendation Development: Greater-Than-Class C Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
    2. CAU 106 Soils Update
    3. Site-Wide EIS Work Plan Development
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Nevada, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Denise Rupp at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the phone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral presentations pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Denise Rupp at the telephone number listed above. The request 
must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comments will be provided a maximum 
of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing to Denise Rupp at the 
address listed above or at the following Web site: http://nv.energy.gov/nssab/MeetingMinutes.aspx.

    Issued at Washington, DC on May 16, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-12500 Filed 5-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of the PrincipalFinancial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marian P. Hamlett,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 15, 2005 |   /s/ Marian P. Hamlett |   |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Marian P. Hamlett,                |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer           |

 

----