alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 207 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 207

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Approving certain regulations to implement provisions of the 
 Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 relating to labor-management 
 relations with respect to covered employees, other than employees of 
the House of Representatives and employees of the Senate, and for other 
                               purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 207

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The regulations described in subsection (b) are 
hereby approved, insofar as such regulations apply to covered employees 
under the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (other than 
employees of the House of Representatives and employees of the Senate) 
and to the extent such regulations are consistent with the provisions 
of such Act.
    (b) Regulations Approved.--The regulations referred to in 
subsection (a) are the regulations issued by the Office of Compliance 
on July 9, 1996, under section 220(d) of the Congressional 
Accountability Act of 1995 to implement section 220 of such Act 
(relating to the application of chapter 71 of title 5, United States 
Code), as published in the Congressional Record on July 11, 1996 
(Volume 142, daily edition), beginning on page H7454.

SEC. 2. ADOPTION OF REGULATIONS RELATING TO HEARING OFFICERS.

    The Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance shall adopt 
regulations (in accordance with section 304 of the Congressional 
Accountability Act of 1995) to implement the requirement that the Board 
refer any matter under section 220(c)(1) of such Act which relates to 
covered employees (other than employees of the House of Representatives 
and employees of the Senate) to a hearing officer.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### Open Literature Review Screen Chemical Name: Atrazine 

### CAS No: 1912-24-9 

### Citation: Berard, A., T. Pelte, et al. (1998). "Characterisation ofphytoplankton from two limnic systems contaminated by a herbicidal photosynthetic inhibitor. The PICT method (Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance): application and significance." Annales De Limnologie-International Journal ofLimnology 34(3): 269-282. 

### (iMKI()**l-t~T** 

### 3)"CZ.) Date ofScreen: 08/24/09 

### Rationale for Not Conducting aFull Open Literature Review Summary: The study was notwritten in English. Study text was written in French and only the abstract, table titles and figure titles were interpreted. 

### Primary Reviewer: Lisa Muto, StaffScientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc. 

### Secondary Reviewer: Teri Myers, Senior Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.



# 1111••••11 2087833
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 12, 2002

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41275

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MANUEL MARTINEZ-REYES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-01-CR-449-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Manuel Martinez-Reyes appeals his guilty plea

conviction and sentence for being found in the United States

after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MartinezReyes argues that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

are unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case. 

He contends that the unconstitutional portions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326

should be severed from the statute. He asks us to vacate his
No. 01-41275

-2-

conviction and sentence, reform the judgment to reflect a

conviction only under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and remand his case for

resentencing under that provision. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Martinez-Reyes acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been called

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489-90

(2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review.

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Id. at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. The Government asks that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134846 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134846 

 COA: 262673 
 Barry CC: 02-100200-FH 

TIMMY ALLEN ROSENBERG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1213 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 20, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854860
<NAME>                        Williams Controlsm Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          3,091
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (445)
<INVENTORY>                                    14,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,749
<PP&E>                                         25,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                  6,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,260
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          179
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   53,942
<SALES>                                        42,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               42,305
<CGS>                                          32,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  39,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                      589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               846
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,172)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,210)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                               1,101,210
<SECURITIES>                         1,174,085
<RECEIVABLES>                          697,517
<ALLOWANCES>                            27,870
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     3,129,175
<PP&E>                                 221,234
<DEPRECIATION>                         141,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       3,886,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  582,736
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                             30,000
<COMMON>                                10,421
<OTHER-SE>                           3,262,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         3,886,137
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     1,520,756
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          655,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        864,992
<INCOME-TAX>                           864,992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    864,992
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           864,992
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.08


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 56099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23188]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1325; Airspace Docket No. 10-ASO-40]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Orangeburg, SC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects the geographic coordinates and state 
abbreviation of a final rule published in the Federal Register of July 
25, 2011, that amends Class E airspace at Orangeburg Municipal Airport, 
Orangeburg, SC.

DATES: Effective Date 0901 UTC, October 20, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Horrocks, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register Docket No. FAA-2010-1325, Airspace Docket No. 10-
ASO-40, published in the Federal Register of July 25, 2011 (76 FR 
44257), amends Class E airspace at Orangeburg Municipal Airport, 
Orangeburg, SC. A typographical error was made in the state 
abbreviation and geographic coordinates of the airport listed in the 
airspace description. This action corrects that error.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of 
FAA Order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010 and effective September 15, 
2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, in FR Doc. 
2011-18173 published on July 25, 2011 (76 FR 44257) on page 44257, 
column 3, line 26, correct the airspace descriptor from ``ASO GA E5 
Orangeburg, SC [Amended]'' to ``ASO SC E5 Orangeburg, SC [Amended]'', 
and on page 44257, column 3, line 28, in the airspace description under 
Orangeburg Municipal Airport, SC, remove ``lat. 33[deg]27[min]39[sec] 
N., long. 80[deg]51[min]32[sec] W.'' and insert ``lat. 
33[deg]27[min]25[sec] N., long. 80[deg]51[min]34[sec] W.''

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 19, 2011.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2011-23188 Filed 9-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
President's Cancer Panel.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: President's Cancer Panel.
    Date: September 22, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4:10 p.m.
    Agenda: America's Demographic and Cultural Transformation: 
Implications for the Cancer Enterprise.
    Place: The Westin Seattle, 1900 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101.
    Contact Person: Abby B. Sandler, PhD, Executive Secretary, 
Chief, Institute Review Office, Office of the Director, 6116 
Executive Blvd., Suite 220, MSC 8349, National Cancer Institute, 
NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-8349. (301) 451-9399. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cdbeaca3a9a1a8bfac8da0aca4a1e3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa899b949e969f889bba979b9396d4949392d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/pcp.htm, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 28, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-18531 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 30

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 16, 1995

Mr. SCARBOROUGH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, February 16, 1995, it stand ad4 journed until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 21, 1995,

5 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified

6 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res7 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

8 recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday,

9 February 16, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the

10 majority leader or his designee, in accordance with this

11 resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon, or

12 at such time on that day as may be specified by the major13 ity leader or his designee in the motion to recess or ad-
2

HCON 30 ATH

1 journ, on Wednesday, February 22, 1995, or until noon

2 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem3 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

4 whichever occurs first.

5 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority

6 leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

7 the minority leader of the House and the minority leader

8 of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and

9 Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their opin10 ion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
Water quality standards are:• Legally binding provisions of law that describe the desired condition of awaterbody or the level of protection or mandate how it will be expressedor established for such waters in the future.• The foundation of the water quality-based control program mandated bythe Clean Water Act (CWA).Water quality standards consist of:• Designated uses of the water body (e.g., recreation, water supply,aquatic life, agriculture).• Water quality criteria to protect designated uses (numeric pollutantconcentrations and narrative requirements).• An antidegradation requirements to maintain and protect existing usesand high quality waters.• General policies addressing implementation issues.10General BackgroundWho sets WQS?• Under the CWA, states and authorized tribes establishstandards.• States and tribes must hold public hearings to review theirstandards every 3 years and revise them as necessary.• EPA must approve the standards in order for them to be ineffect for CWA purposes.• The CWA requires EPA to impose federal WQS, if EPAdisapproves WQS or determines that new or revised WQSare necessary to meet the requirements of the CWA, unlessthe state or tribe adopts WQS that meet CWA requirements.11General Background12General BackgroundWhat Does the WQS Regulation Do?Adds detail to the CWA provisions for standards:• Defines when and how designated uses may be revised.• Requires criteria to protect uses.• Requires water quality achieved to be maintained, exceptunder certain circumstances.• Requires states/tribes to review their WQS every threeyears and engage the public in any changes to WQS.• Specifies roles of states, tribes, and EPA, andadministrative procedures.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 104 Agreed to House (ATH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 104

            Providing for an adjournment of the two houses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1995

  Mr. Shays submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, 
September 29, 1995, it stand adjourned until 10 a.m. on Friday, October 
6, 1995, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
on any day beginning with Friday, September 29, 1995, through Friday, 
October 6, 1995, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or 
his designee in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Tuesday, October 10, 1995, or until such time 
on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997                    
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             7,136
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       56,305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 121,929
<PP&E>                                           391,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                   116,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   434,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             79,863
<BONDS>                                          202,358
<COMMON>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     434,371
<SALES>                                          270,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 270,261
<CGS>                                            198,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    243,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   11,335
<INCOME-TAX>                                       4,536
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                6,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       6,799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        

</TABLE>