alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification**
I, William J. Pasenelli, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer of Tri-County Financial Corporation, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tri-County FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (d) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (e) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and  (f) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard or directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (c) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (d) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 15, 2004      /s/ William J. Pasenelli   William J. Pasenelli   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
J .,jEo 3rA,~ S W O Z 4C pR0S7 

### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII 901 NORTH 5TH STREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101 

### 2 S OCT 2M8 Mr . Dan Schuette, Director Division of Environmental Quality Missouri Department ofNatural Resources Jefferson State Office Building P.O . Box 176 Jefferson City, MO 65102 Dear Mr. Schuette: On September 16, 2008, we received your request to amend the Missouri State Implementation Plan to revise 10CSR 10-6.220, "Restriction ofVisible Air Contaminants." The intent ofthis revision is to remove redundant definitions, remove an outdated exemptionfor incinerators used to burn refuse in the outstate area of Missouri, clarify that all sources shall have the opacity ofvisible emissions determined by one of the test methods in the rule, and update the test method for continuous opacity monitoring systems to the latest test reference. We have determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete. This determination does not mean that we have made anyjudgment as to the approvability ofthe submittal . We are reviewing it against applicable Environmental Protection Agency criteria so that we can take formal action on the submittal . Final action will be taken after publication of notice in the Federal Register and an opportunity forpublic comment. The principal contact for this rulemaking is Amy Algoe-Eakin. Ifyou have any questions, please contact her at (913) 551-7942. Sincerely, BeckyWeber Director Air and Waste Management Division cc: Mr. James Kavanaugh Director, Air Pollution Control Program, MDNR



### RECYCLE
#### § 157.6151-1 Time and place for paying of tax shown on returns.

The tax under chapter 55 (Structured Settlement Factoring Transactions) of the Internal Revenue Code shown on any return must, without assessment or notice and demand, be paid at the time and place specified in the forms and instructions provided by the Internal Revenue Service. For provisions relating to the time and place for filing such return, see § 157.6071-1 and § 157.6091-1. For provisions relating to the extension of time for paying the tax, see § 157.6161-1.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 13-908

________________________________________________________________________

WEAPONS

Proliferation

Memorandum of Understanding

 Between the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and LIBYA

Signed at Tripoli September 8, 2013 

with

Exchange of Notes

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
 LIBYA

 Weapons: Proliferation

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Tripoli September 8, 2013;

 Entered into force September 8, 2013.

 With exchange of notes.
1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3942

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Troy S. Thompson, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 6, 2007

Filed: April 12, 2007

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Troy S. Thompson appeals the 24-month prison sentence that the district court1

imposed after revoking his probation. We affirm. 

Specifically, because the revocation sentence was within authorized limits and

the district court considered appropriate factors in imposing it, see 18 U.S.C.

§§ 3553(a), 3565(a), we conclude that Thompson’s sentence is not unreasonable, see

United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation
-2-

sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)); cf. United States v. Franklin, 397 F.3d 604, 606-07

(8th Cir. 2005) (24-month revocation sentence, where Guidelines recommended 8-14

months, was not abuse of discretion where transcript showed court was aware of

defendant’s multiple violations of supervised-release conditions and of Guidelines

range and statutory maximum). 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. 

______________________________
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services,a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the“Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv),which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 26

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
issued to honor the 100th anniversary of the Jewish War Veterans of the 
                       United States of America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1995

    Mr. Talent (for himself and Mr. Gilman) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be 
issued to honor the 100th anniversary of the Jewish War Veterans of the 
                       United States of America.

Whereas the Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, an organization 
        of patriotic Americans dedicated to highlighting the role of Jews in the 
        United States Armed Forces, will celebrate 100 years of patriotic 
        service to the Nation on March 15, 1996;
Whereas thousands of Jews have proudly served the Nation in times of war;
Whereas thousands of Jews have died in combat while serving in the United States 
        Armed Forces;
Whereas, in World War II alone, Jews received more than 52,000 awards for 
        outstanding service in the United States Armed Forces, including the 
        Medal of Honor, the Air Medal, the Silver Star, and the Purple Heart;
Whereas, in World War II alone, over 11,000 Jews died in combat while serving in 
        the United States Armed Forces;
Whereas members of the Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America have 
        volunteered over 10,000,000 hours at veterans' hospitals; and
Whereas honoring the sacrifices of Jewish veterans is an important component of 
        recognizing the strong and patriotic role Jews have played in the United 
        States Armed Forces: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a postage stamp should be issued to honor the 100th 
        anniversary of the Jewish War Veterans of the United States of 
        America; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee of the United 
        States Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster 
        General that such a postage stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Overseas Private Investment Corporation

# Time and Date:

 2 p.m., Thursday, September 3, 2009.

# Place:

 Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

 Hearing open to the Public at 2 p.m.

# Purpose:

 Public Hearing in conjunction with each meeting of OPIC's Board of Directors, to afford an opportunity for any person to present views regarding the activities of the Corporation.

# Procedures:

 Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must provide advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 p.m. Thursday, August 27, 2009. The notice must include the individual's name, title, organization, address, and telephone number, and a concise summary of the subject matter to be presented.

Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request to participate an opportunity to be heard.

Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 p.m. Thursday, August 27, 2009. Such statement must be typewritten, double-spaced, and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.

Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda for the hearing identifying speakers, setting forth the subject on which each participant will speak, and the time allotted for each presentation. The agenda will be available at the hearing.

A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary will be made available, upon written request to OPIC's Corporate Secretary, at the cost of reproduction.

# Contact Person for Information:

                         Information on the hearing may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 218-0136, or via e-mail at                         *Connie.Downs@opic.gov.*

 Dated: August 3, 2009.

Connie M. Downs,

OPIC Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-18836 Filed 8-3-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
#### § 20.2103-1 Estates of nonresidents not citizens; “entire gross estate”.

The “entire gross estate” wherever situated of a nonresident who was not a citizen of the United States at the time of his death is made up in the same way as the “gross estate” of a citizen or resident of the United States. See §§ 20.2031-1 through 20.2044-1. See paragraphs (a) and (c) of § 20.2031-1 for the circumstances under which real property situated outside the United States is excluded from the gross estate of a citizen or resident of the United States. However, except as provided in section 2107(b) with respect to the estates of certain expatriates, in the case of a nonresident not a citizen, only that part of the entire gross estate which on the date of the decedent's death is situated in the United States is included in his taxable estate. In fact, property situated outside the United States need not be disclosed on the return unless section 2107 is applicable, certain deductions are claimed, or information is specifically requested. See §§ 20.2106-1, 20.2106-2, and 20.2107-1. For a description of property considered to be situated in the United States, see § 20.2104-1. For a description of property considered to be situated outside the United States, see § 20.2105-1.

[T.D. 7296, 38 FR 34195, Dec. 12, 1973]
§ 1.852-7 Additional information required in returns of shareholders. Any person who fails or refuses to comply with the demand of a regulated investment company for the written statements which § 1.852-6 requires the company to demand from its shareholders shall submit as a part of his income tax return a statement showing, to the best of his knowledge and belief— ( a ) The number of shares actually owned by him at any and all times during the period for which the return is filed in any company claiming to be a regulated investment company;
( b ) The dates of acquisition of any such stock during such period and the names and addresses of persons from whom it was acquired;
( c ) The dates of disposition of any such stock during such period and the names and addresses of the transferees thereof;
( d ) The names and addresses of the members of his family (as defined in section 544(a)(2)); the names and addresses of his partners, if any, in any partnership; and the maximum number of shares, if any, actually owned by each in any corporation claiming to be a regulated investment company, at any time during the last half of the taxable year of such company;
( e ) The names and addresses of any corporation, partnership, association, or trust in which he had a beneficial interest to the extent of at least 10 percent at any time during the period for which such return is made, and the number of shares of any corporation claiming to be a regulated investment company actually owned by each;
( f ) The maximum number of shares (including the number and face value of securities convertible into stock of the corporation) in any domestic corporation claiming to be a regulated investment company to be considered as constructively owned by such individual at any time during the last half of the corporation's taxable year, as provided in section 544 and the regulations thereunder; and
( g ) The amount and date of receipt of each dividend received during such period from every corporation claiming to be a regulated investment company.
427 A.2d 1208

#### Commonwealth v. Drayton, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

Edward T. Feierstein, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, WIEAND and VAN der VOORT, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation.

Order affirmed.
H. Con. Res. 211 Agreed to September 17, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a technical correction

in the enrollment of H.R. 3060.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3060) to implement

the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty,

the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the following

technical correction: In section 201(a)(1) strike ‘‘paragraphs (1)

through (9) of subsection (a) as paragraphs (3) through (11)’’ and

insert in lieu thereof ‘‘paragraphs (1) through (10) of subsection

(a) as paragraphs (3) through (12)’’.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 106 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.106
                                             Agreed to December 22, 1995

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used from 8 o'clock 
ante meridiem until 3 o'clock post meridiem on April 16, 1996, for a 
ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of 
victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 
be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of 
the Capitol may prescribe.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
#### Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emil P. Johnson, Administrator of the Estate of Charles E. Johnson, Deceased, and Edna Johnson, Defendants-Appellants.

Gen. No. 68-25.

Third District.

December 23, 1968.

Gerard & Gerard, of Chicago, and Covey, Kehr & Covey, of Chillicothe, for appellants;

McConnell, Kennedy, McConnell & Morris, and Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, of Peoria, for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE STOUDER.

Not to be published in full.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 85 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 85

   To authorize the printing of additional copies of a Senate report 
               entitled ``Developments in Aging: 1992''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 31 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

Mr. Pryor submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize the printing of additional copies of a Senate report 
               entitled ``Developments in Aging: 1992''.

    Resolved, That there shall be printed for the use of the Special 
Committee on Aging, in addition to the usual number of copies, the 
maximum number of copies of volumes 1 and 2 of the annual report of the 
committee to the Senate, entitled ``Developments in Aging: 1992'', 
which additional copies may be printed at a cost not to exceed $1,200.

                                 <all>
```