40762 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

emissions allowable under the 

exemptions from its tunnel dryers 

numbered #1, #2, #3, and #4, and fluid 

bed dryers numbered #1, #2, and #3. 

This amendment reduces combined 

cutoffs for these seven dryers while 

increasing Abbott’s operational 

flexibility, by allowing it to make 

preferential use of the more efficient 

fluid bed dryers. 

IV. What is EPA’s analysis of Illinois’ 

revised pharmaceutical manufacturing 

rule? 

The revisions to Illinois’ 

pharmaceutical manufacturing rule are 

approvable because it lowers the total 

allowable emissions from seven dryers 

and is consistent with the CAA, EPA 

regulations, and relevant policy. 

More specifically, the individual 

applicability cutoffs for the seven 

affected dryers results in a combined 

allowable emission total of 45 tons of 

VOC per year. The 45 tons VOC per year 

is based on a 5 tons VOC cutoff (in prior 

subsection 218.480(b)(2)) for each of the 

three fluid bed dryers and a 7.5 tons 

VOC per year cutoff (in prior subsection 

218.480 (b)(3) for each of the four tunnel 

dryers. This compares with a 20.6 tons 

VOC per year total in new subsection 

218.480(b)(4) for tunnel dryers 

numbered #1, #2, #3, and #4, and fluid 

bed dryers numbered #1, #2, and #3. 

Subsection 218.480(b)(4) replaces 

subsections 218.480(b)(2) and 

218.480(b)(3) for these seven dryers. 

The main basis for evaluating this 

proposal is EPA’s January 2001 policy 

on Economic Incentive Programs (EIP), 

which is EPA’s applicable policy for 

evaluating emission averaging plans, 

also referred to as ‘‘bubbles.’’ Under the 

EIP policy, a combined emission limit is 

based on the lower of actual or 

allowable emissions. Actual emissions 

are based on the highest consecutive 

two-year period during the preceding 

ten-year period, which in this case is 

1999–2000. The average annual actual 

emissions for the seven dryers during 

this two-year period was calculated to 

be 22.9 tons VOC per year. The EIP 

policy also requires reducing this 

annual emission average by ten percent 

to establish an environmental benefit. 

This results in a combined emission 

limit of 20.6 tons VOC per year, which 

is the value in the new subsection 

218.480(b)(4). 

Illinois amended its July 17, 2009, SIP 

submittal in a May 12, 2010, letter and 

attachments from Laurel L. Kroack, 

Chief, Bureau of Air, Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency, to 

EPA. This letter establishes how 

compliance with Abbott’s 20.6 tons 

VOC per year limit is determined as 

well as Abbott’s recordkeeping 

requirements. Specifically, this letter 

states: 

It is the Illinois EPA’s interpretation that 

compliance with Abbott’s 20.6 tons VOC per 

year limit shall be determined on a monthly 

basis from the sum of the data for the current 

month plus the preceding 11 months 

(running 12 month total) consistent with 

Condition 7.1.6(i) of Abbott’s current Title V 

permit #96010010, issued on September 26, 

2007. Compliance will be demonstrated 

according to the compliance calculation 

methodology and corresponding 

recordkeeping procedures in Katherine 

Hodge’s April 23, 2008 email to EPA, 

including both the body of the email and its 

attachments, as well as the compliance 

procedures in Condition 7.1.12(e) of Abbott’s 

current Title V permit. Also, Abbott’s 

recordkeeping requirements should also be 

consistent with the recordkeeping 

requirements reflected in Katherine Hodge’s 

April 23, 2008 email, including both the 

body of the e-mail and its attachments. These 

records would need to be maintained for five 

years. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: June 30, 2010. 

Walter W. Kovalick Jr., 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17139 Filed 7–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0514; FRL–9172–2] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Sacramento 

Metropolitan Air Quality Management 

District and South Coast Air Quality 

Management District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Sacramento 

Metropolitan Air Quality Management 

District (SMAQMD) and South Coast Air 

Quality Management District 

(SCAQMD) portions of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from 

vanishing oils, rust inhibitors, plastic 

coatings, rubber coatings, glass coatings, 

and aerospace operations. We are 

proposing to approve these local rules to 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 134 / Wednesday, July 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules 40763 

regulate these emission sources under 

the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 

(CAA or the Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by August 13, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number [EPA–R09– 

OAR–2010–0514], by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions. 

2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at http://www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. 

http://www.regulations.gov is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA 

will not know your identity or contact 

information unless you provide it in the 

body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the public 

comment. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: The index to the docket for 

this action is available electronically at 

http://www.regulations.gov and in hard 

copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, California. While 

all documents in the docket are listed in 

the index, some information may be 

publicly available only at the hard copy 

location (e.g., copyrighted material), and 

some may not be publicly available in 

either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the 

hard copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947– 

4126, law.nicole@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rules: SCAQMD 1144, SCAQMD 1145, 

and SMAQMD 456. In the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving these local 

rules in a direct final action without 

prior proposal because we believe these 

SIP revisions are not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: June 18, 2010. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2010–17074 Filed 7–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

41 CFR Part 102–38 

[FMR Case 2010–102–3; Docket 2010–0014; 

Sequence 1] 

RIN 3090–AJ04 

Federal Management Regulation; Sale 

of Personal Property 

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide 

Policy, General Services Administration 

(GSA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The General Services 

Administration is amending the Federal 

Management Regulation (FMR) by 

amending the provisions for the sale of 

personal property through Federal Asset 

Sales (FAS) Sales Centers. 

DATES: Interested parties should submit 

comments in writing on or before 

August 13, 2010 to be considered in the 

formulation of a final rule. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

identified by FMR case 2010–102–3 by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Agency Web Site: http:// 

www.gsa.gov/fmr. Click on FMR 

Proposed Rules, and the FMR case 

number to submit comments. 

• E-mail: fmrcase.2010–102– 

3@gsa.gov. Include FMR case 2010– 

102–3 in the subject line of the message. 

• Fax: 202–501–4067. 

• Mail: General Services 

Administration, Regulatory Secretariat 

(MVCB), 1800 F Street, NW., Room 

4041, ATTN: Hada Flowers, 

Washington, DC 20405. 

Instructions: Please submit comments 

only and cite FMR case 2010–102–3 in 

all correspondence related to this case. 

All comments received will be posted 

without change to http://www.gsa.gov/ 

fmr, including any personal information 

provided. Click on FMR Public 

Comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Regulatory Secretariat, Room 4041, GS 

Building, Washington, DC 20405, at 

(202) 501–4755 for information 

pertaining to status or publication 

schedules. For clarification of content, 

contact Mr. Robert Holcombe, Office of 

Governmentwide Policy, Personal 

Property Management Policy, at 

(202) 501–3828, or e-mail at 

robert.holcombe@gsa.gov. Please cite 

FMR case 2010–102–3. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

This proposed amendment to part 

102–38 of the Federal Management 

Regulation (41 CFR part 102–38) 

updates policy pursuant to the transfer 

of the oversight of the Federal Asset 

Sales program from GSA’s Office of 

Governmentwide Policy to GSA’s 

Federal Acquisition Service. Due to this 

transfer, and the incorporation of these 

practices into the way the Government 

sells its property, references to the 

Executive Steering Committee, Planning 

Office and the eFAS acronym are 

proposed to be removed. 

This proposed amendment also— 

1. Adds the definition for contractor 

inventory and revises the definitions for 

Federal Asset Sales and Sales Center 

(section 102–38.35); 

2. Clarifies that contractor inventory 

may be disposed of by the contractor 

when required by the Federal contract 

(section 102–38.40); 

3. Clarifies the reporting requirement 

for negotiated sales (section 102– 

38.115(a)); 

4. Removes reference to Standard 

Form (SF) 97A, as this form is no longer 

available from GSA. (Section 

102.38.285.); 

5. Clarifies the policy on antitrust 

requirements (section 102–38.325); and 

6. Makes minor edits, updates 

organizational designations, and makes 

non-substantive changes to improve the 

readability and ease of use of this 

policy. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1