alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.6091-3 Filing certain international income tax returns. The following income tax returns shall be filed as directed in the applicable forms and instructions: ( a ) Income tax returns on which all, or a portion, of the tax is to be paid in foreign currency. See §§ 301.6316-1 to 301.6316-6 inclusive, and §§ 301.6316-8 and 301.6316-9 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).
( b ) Income tax returns on an individual citizen of the United States whose principal place of abode for the period with respect to which the return is filed is outside the United States. A taxpayer's principal place of abode will be considered to be outside the United States if his legal residence is outside the United States or if his return bears a foreign address.
( c ) Income tax returns of an individual citizen of a possession of the United States (whether or not a citizen of the United States) who has no legal residence or principal place of business in any internal revenue district in the United States.
( d ) Except in the case of any departing alien return under section 6851 and § 1.6851-2, the income tax return of any nonresident alien (other than one treated as a resident under section 6013 (g) or (h)).
( e ) The income tax return of an estate or trust the fiduciary of which is outside the United States and has no legal residence or principal place of business in any internal revenue district in the United States.
( f ) Income tax returns of foreign corporations.
( g ) The return by a withholding agent of the income tax required to be withheld at source under chapter 3 of the Code on nonresident aliens and foreign corporations and tax-free covenant bonds, as provided in § 1.1461-2.
( h ) Income tax returns of persons who claim the benefits of section 911 (relating to earned income from sources without the United States).
( i ) Income tax returns of corporations which claim the benefits of section 922 (relating to special deduction for Western Hemisphere trade corporations) except in the case of consolidated returns filed pursuant to the regulations under section 1502.
( j ) Income tax returns of persons who claim the benefits of section 931 (relating to income from sources within possessions of the United States).
( k ) Income tax returns of persons who claim the benefits of section 933 (relating to income from sources within Puerto Rico).
( l ) Income tax returns of corporations which claim the benefits of section 941 (relating to the special deduction for China Trade Act corporations).
[T.D. 6950, 33 FR 5357, Apr. 4, 1968, as amended by T.D. 7012, 34 FR 7690, May 15, 1969; T.D. 7670, 45 FR 6931, Jan. 31, 1980; T.D. 9156, 69 FR 55744, Sept. 16, 2004]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 15, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131765 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. STACEY HELFER, Next Friend of Amber 

Stephen J. Markman, Seilicki, Minor, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131765 

 COA: 265757 

Macomb CC: 04-003161-NI 

CENTER LINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS and 

DEANNA LYNN MULRENIN, 

Defendants, 

Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and 

MICHELLE SLOAT,

 Defendant,

 Third-Party Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for 

the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we REMAND this case 

to the Macomb Circuit Court for entry of an order granting summary disposition in favor 

of the defendants. 

t1108 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 15, 2006 

 Clerk
Extension Agreement



 Exhibit 10.17b 
 
EXTENSION AGREEMENT 
 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 
 as Administrative Agent 
 under the Credit Agreement 
 referred to below 
 270 Park Avenue 
 New York, NY 10017 
 Gentlemen: 
 The undersigned hereby agrees to extend, effective October 18, 2006, the Termination Date under the Credit Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004 (as
amended from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) among Praxair, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), the Subsidiaries referred to therein, the Lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent (the “Administrative Agent”), Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent and Citibank, N.A. and Credit Suisse First Boston, as Co-Documentation Agents, for one year to December 23, 2011. Terms defined in the
Credit Agreement are used herein with the same meaning. 
 This Extension Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the
law of the State of New York. 
  

			
	[LENDERS]
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	


 Agreed and accepted: 
  

			
	PRAXAIR, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Micheal J. Allan

	Name:	 	Micheal J. Allan
	Title:	 	Vice President and Treasurer

  

			
	 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as
 Administrative Agent

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stacey Haimes

	Name:	 	Stacey Haimes
	Title:	 	Vice President
#### § 1.815-1 Taxable years affected.

Sections 1.815-2 through 1.815-6, except as otherwise provided therein, are applicable only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1957, and all references to sections of part I, subchapter L, chapter 1 of the Code are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended by the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 (73 Stat. 112), the Act of October 10, 1962 (76 Stat. 808), and the Act of October 23, 1962 (76 Stat. 1134).

[T.D. 6886, 31 FR 8689, June 23, 1966]
§ 1.6061-1 Signing of returns and other documents by individuals. ( a ) *Requirement.* Each individual (including a fiduciary) shall sign the income tax return required to be made by him, except that the return may be signed for the taxpayer by an agent who is duly authorized in accordance with paragraph (a)(5) or (b) of § 1.6012-1 to make such return. Other returns, statements, or documents required under the provisions of subtitle A or F of the Code or of the regulations thereunder to be made by any person with respect to any tax imposed by subtitle A of the Code shall be signed in accordance with any regulations contained in this chapter, or any instructions, issued with respect to such returns, statements, or other documents.
( b ) *Cross references.* For provisions relating to the signing of returns, statements, or other documents required to be made by corporations and partnerships with respect to any tax imposed by subtitle A of the Code, see §§ 1.6062-1 and 1.6063-1, respectively. For provisions relating to the making of returns by agents, see paragraphs (a)(5) and (b) of § 1.6012-1; and to the making of returns for minors and persons under a disability, see paragraph (a)(4) of § 1.6012-1 and paragraph (b) of § 1.6012-3.
[T.D. 7332, 39 FR 44232, Dec. 23, 1974]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                       553
<INVENTORY>                                        607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,922
<PP&E>                                          46,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,891
<SALES>                                         11,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,284
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   218
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
§ 1.613-1 Percentage depletion; general rule. ( a ) *In general.* In the case of a taxpayer computing the deduction for depletion under section 611 with respect to minerals on the basis of a percentage of gross income from the property, as defined in section 613(c) and §§ 1.613-3 and 1.613-4, the deduction shall be the percentage of the gross income as specified in section 613(b) and § 1.613-2. The deduction shall not exceed 50 percent (100 percent in the case of oil and gas properties for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1990) of the taxpayer's taxable income from the property (computed without regard to the allowance for depletion). The taxable income shall be computed in accordance with § 1.613-5. In no case shall the deduction for depletion computed under this section be less than the deduction computed upon the cost or other basis of the property provided in section 612 and the regulations thereunder. The apportionment of the deduction between the several owners of economic interests in a mineral deposit will be made as provided in paragraph (c) of § 1.611-1. For rules with respect to “gross income from the property” and for definition of the term “mining,” see §§ 1.613-3 and 1.613-4. For definitions of the terms “property,” “mineral deposit,” and “minerals,” see paragraph (d) of § 1.611-1.
( b ) *Denial of percentage depletion in case of oil and gas wells.* Except as otherwise provided in section 613A and the regulations thereunder, in the case of oil or gas which is produced after December 31, 1974, and to which gross income is attributable after that date, the allowance for depletion shall be computed without regard to section 613.
[T.D. 8348, 56 FR 21938, May 13, 1991, as amended by T.D. 8437, 57 FR 43899, Sept. 23, 1992]
##### 



Exhibit 11

POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN
INC.

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30


|  |  |                                                                               |  |      |            |      |  |   |            | 
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | 
|  |  |                                                                               |  | 2003 |            | 2002
| 
| 
|A |  | Net (loss) income as reported, Canadian GAAP ($
    millions)                 |  | $    | (152.8     | )    |  | $ | 39.2       | 
|B |  | Items adjusting net (loss) income ($ millions)                                |  | $    | 40.2       |      |  | $ | 5.3        | 
|C |  | Net (loss) income, US GAAP ($ millions)                                       |  | $    | (112.6     | )    |  | $ | 44.5       | 
|D |  | Weighted average number of shares outstanding                                 |  |      | 52,106,000 |      |  |   | 52,006,000 | 
|E |  | Net additional shares issuable for diluted
    earnings per share calculation |  |      |           |      |  |   | 256,000    | 
|  |  | CANADIAN GAAP                                                                 |  |      |            |      |  |   |            | 
|  |  | Basic (loss) earnings per share (A/D)                                         |  | $    | (2.93      | )    |  | $ | 0.75       | 
|  |  | Diluted (loss) earnings per share (A/(D+E))                                   |  | $    | (2.93      | )    |  | $ | 0.75       | 
|  |  | UNITED STATES GAAP                                                            |  |      |            |      |  |   |            | 
|  |  | Basic (loss) earnings per share (C/D)                                         |  | $    | (2.16      | )    |  | $ | 0.86       | 
|  |  | Diluted (loss) earnings per share (C/(D+E))                                   |  | $    | (2.16      | )    |  | $ | 0.85       | 

xi
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alpha Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Ziegler, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 12, 2016  /s/ Karen Ziegler Karen Ziegler Principal Financial Officer Principal Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 10, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00397

- CV

INTEREST OF S.D.A., et al,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013EM506191

Honorable E ric Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On November 25, 2014, we issued an order setting this appeal for submission on briefs.

Upon further examination of the briefs and the record, we conclude our prior order setting this

appeal for submission was premature and should be withdrawn.

This is an appeal from an order in a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship filed by

the Attorney General of Texas. The appellant is Sam Marlon Alvarez. The appellees are the

Attorney Gene ral of Texas and Dulce Reynoso Alvarez. The trial court’s order includes a finding

pursuant to section 105.006(c) of the Texas Family Code and restricts the disclosure of Ms.

Alvarez’s address and other identifying information. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 105 .006(c)

(West 2014). The Clerk of this Court was never provided with an address for Ms. Alvarez. As a

consequence, no correspondence concerning this appeal has been sent to Ms. Alvarez.

Appellant’s brief has been filed

. The Attorney General of Texas has declined to file a

brief. For obvious reasons, Ms. Alvarez has not filed a brief in this appeal.

T he Attorney General of Texas has recently taken steps to inform Ms. Alvarez of the

existence of this ap peal and to provide her with inform ation about how to contact the Clerk of

this C ourt for more information concerning this appeal

.

In light of the fact that Ms. Alvarez has not been given an opportunity to file a brief, o ur

November 25, 2014 order setting this appeal for submission on January 7, 2015

, is

WI THDRAWN pending further order of th is Court.

### PER CURIAM

A ttested to:

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

d0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138957 

CONNER CREEK ACADEMY EAST, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138957 

 COA: 289241 

 Macomb CC: 07-004923-CZ 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 

ECONOMIC GROWTH and BUREAU 

OF CONSTRUCTION CODES, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

CITY OF WARREN, 

Intervening Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of October1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Servicer and Special Servicer and U.S. BankNational Association, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-HAUL (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.8 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of theServicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the“Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during suchperiod has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
# C_2014409EN.01006201.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/62

---

Action brought on 2 October 2014 — Grundig Multimedia v OHIM (DetergentOptimiser)

(Case T-707/14)

2014/C 409/83

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grundig Multimedia AG (Stansstad, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Walter and M. Neuner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 July 2014 given in Case R 172/2014-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 July 2014 given in Case R 172/2014-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings, including those incurred before the Office. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings, including those incurred before the Office.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘DetergentOptimiser’ for goods in Class 7 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 9 49  559

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) in conjunction Article 7(2) of Regulation No. 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 18, 2010 

Order 

 

August 18, 2010 

139799(56)(58) 

JOHN F. SINGER, III, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC: 139799 

v COA: 284575 

Macomb CC: 06-002281-NI 

ANURADHA SREENIVASAN and 

BALAJI GANAPATHY, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by Michigan Defense Trial Counsel for 

leave to file a brief amicus curiae is considered and it is GRANTED. The motion by 

plaintiff-appellant for extension to August 11, 2010 of the time for filing his brief is 

considered and it is GRANTED.