alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 3/13/15 P. v. Snyder CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RYAN ANTHONY SNYDER,

Defendant and Appellant.

 B260959

 (Los Angeles County

 Super. Ct. No. YA043498)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Alan B. 

Honeycutt, Judge. Dismissed.

Ryan Anthony Snyder, in pro. per.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
2

Defendant, Ryan Anthony Snyder, purports to appeal from an order denying his 

motion to vacate the judgment. The gravamen of defendant’s papers filed in the trial 

court resembles a habeas corpus petition. We recognized the order under review may not 

be appealable. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction on our own 

motion. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 

Cal.3d 390, 398.) Hence, we issued an order to show cause and calendared the matter of 

argument which was waived. 

The denial of a motion to vacate the judgment is, under our circumstances, 

nonappealable. (People v. Banks (1959) 53 Cal.2d 370, 378; People v. Gallardo (2000) 

77 Cal.App.4th 971, 980.) In many respects, defendant’s paperwork bears a remarkable 

resemblance to a habeas corpus petition. The denial of a habeas corpus petition is not 

appealable. (In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767, fn. 7; In re Hochberg (1970) 2 Cal.3d 

870, 876, disapproved on other grounds in In re Fields (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1063, 1070, fn. 

3.) Thus, the order under review is not appealable.

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

TURNER, P. J.

We concur:

MOSK, J.

KRIEGLER, J.
# C_2015081EN.01002901.xml

| 9.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/29

---

Order of the General Court of 12 January 2015 — Luxembourg v Commission

(Case T-258/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 081/37)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fifth Chamber (extended composition) has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Martin J. Reid, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ibis TechnologyCorporation;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:

a)             designed such disclosure controlsand procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)             all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 15, 2006 | /s/Martin J. Reid                     |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Martin J. Reid                        |   |
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Base from U.S. Geological Survey, 2010,

 1:2,000,000-scale digital data

Lambert Conformal Conic projection

Standard parallels 41° and 45°, Central meridian -107°30’

Latitude of origin 41°, meters

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83)

0.6

Map Showing Variations in Vitrinite Reflectance at the top of the Lower Shaly Member of the Cody Shale, 

Bighorn Basin, Wyoming and Montana

By

Thomas M. Finn and Mark J. Pawlewicz

2014

Manuscript approved for publication January 16, 2014

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Scientific Investigations Map 3285

Sheet 2 of 3

Pamphlet accompanies map

Clark's

Range

sub-basin

Absaroka

Basin

Oregon

fault

Fork

Beartooth

Mountains

Bighorn 

M

o

u

n t

a i

n

s

O w l

C r e e k

M o u n t a i n s

WYOMING

MONTANA

10 0 10 20 30 5 40 KILOMETERS

10 0 5 10 30 30 40 MILES

0.8

0.6

1.35

0.8

1.1

0.6

1.1

1.1

1.35

2.0

0.6

0.8

1.1

0.8

1.1

0.8

1.1

1.35

T

50

N

T

45

N

T

45

N

T

40

N

T

55

N

R 95 W

R 94 W R 90 W R 85 W

R 96 W

R 100 W

R 4 W

R 5 W R 1 W R 1 E R 5 E

R 102 W

T

8

N

R 32 W

R 31 W

R 30 W

R 29 W

R 22 W R 24 W R 26 W R 28 W

R 20 W

R 18 W

R 16 W R 26 W R 27 W

R 34 W

R 90 W

R 101 W R 95 W

R 36 W R 38 W R 40 W

T

8

N

T

58

S

T

57

S

T

8

S

T

6

S

T

4

S

R 108 W R 105 W

R 104 W

T

40

N

T

4

N

T

5

N

R 3 E

T

5

S

T

50

N

30'

30'

30'

44°

110° 30'

30'

30' 30'

45°

30'

30'

44°

45°

108°

107°

107°

30'

109°

110° 109° 30' 108° 30'

MONTANA

WYOMING

EXPLANATION

Tertiary volcanic rock

Frontier/Mowry/Muddy/Thermopolis

 Formations outcrop

Precambrian rock

Vitrinite Reflectance (%Ro)

Line of section (see fig. 7)

Bighorn Basin Province boundary

High-angle fault

Thrust fault—Sawteeth on upper plate

Contour line—Dashed where estimated. 

 Contour interval varies

Well sample point

Composite well sample point

Outcrop sample point

1.35–2.0

2.0+

1.1–1.35

0.8–1.1

0.6–0.8

< 0.6

SCALE 1:500 000

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for 

descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the 

U.S. Government

Publishing support provided by:

Denver Publishing Service Center

To learn about the USGS and its information products visit 

http://www.usgs.gov/

1-888-ASK-USGS

For more information concerning this publication, contact:

Center Director

USGS Central Energy Resources Science Center

Box 25046, Mail Stop 939

Denver, CO 80225

(303) 236–1647

Or visit the Central Energy Resources Science Center Web site at:

http://energy.usgs.gov/

Suggested Citation:

Finn, T.M., and Pawlewicz, M.J., 2014, Maps showing thermal maturity of Upper Cretaceous marine shales in the Bighorn Basin, 

Wyoming and Montana: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3285, 14 p., 3 sheets, scale 1:500,000, 

http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3285.

ISSN 2329-132X (online)

http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sim3285
§ 1.741-1 Recognition and character of gain or loss on sale or exchange. ( a ) The sale or exchange of an interest in a partnership shall, except to the extent section 751(a) applies, be treated as the sale or exchange of a capital asset, resulting in capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the amount realized and the adjusted basis of the partnership interest, as determined under section 705. For treatment of selling partner's distributive share up to date of sale, see section 706(c)(2). Where the provisions of section 751 require the recognition of ordinary income or loss with respect to a portion of the amount realized from such sale or exchange, the amount realized shall be reduced by the amount attributable under section 751 to unrealized receivables and substantially appreciated inventory items, and the adjusted basis of the transferor partner's interest in the partnership shall be reduced by the portion of such basis attributable to such unrealized receivables and substantially appreciated inventory items. See section 751 and § 1.751-1.
( b ) Section 741 shall apply whether the partnership interest is sold to one or more members of the partnership or to one or more persons who are not members of the partnership. Section 741 shall also apply even though the sale of the partnership interest results in a termination of the partnership under section 708(b). Thus, the provisions of section 741 shall be applicable ( 1 ) to the transferor partner in a 2-man partnership when he sells his interest to the other partner, and
( 2 ) to all the members of a partnership when they sell their interests to one or more persons outside the partnership.
( c ) See section 351 for nonrecognition of gain or loss upon transfer of a partnership interest to a corporation controlled by the transferor.
( d ) For rules relating to the treatment of liabilities on the sale or exchange of interests in a partnership see §§ 1.752-1 and 1.1001-2.
( e ) For rules relating to the capital gain or loss recognized when a partner sells or exchanges an interest in a partnership that holds appreciated collectibles or section 1250 property with section 1250 capital gain, see § 1.1(h)-1. This paragraph (e) applies to transfers of interests in partnerships that occur on or after September 21, 2000.
( f ) For rules relating to dividing the holding period of an interest in a partnership, see § 1.1223-3. This paragraph (f) applies to transfers of partnership interests and distributions of property from a partnership that occur on or after September 21, 2000.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11814, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7741, 45 FR 81745, Dec. 12, 1980; T.D. 8902, 65 FR 57099, Sept. 21, 2000]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1


                           SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

PRIMARY BASIS:
                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                              --------------------------------
                                                    1996          1997
                                                  -------       -------
Weighted average shares of common stock            23,098        23,112
Weighted average shares of common stock
 obtainable on exercise of options                  1,901         2,196
                                                  -------       -------
Shares used in per share calculations              24,999        25,308
                                                  -------       -------
Net income                                        $ 3,693       $   395
                                                  -------       -------
Net income per share                              $  0.15       $  0.02
                                                  -------       -------
                                                  -------       -------
PRIMARY BASIS:
                                               NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                               -------------------------------
                                                    1996          1997
                                                  -------       -------
Weighted average shares of common stock            22,934        23,231
Weighted average shares of common stock
 obtainable on exercise of options                  2,224
                                                  -------       -------
Shares used in per share calculations              25,158        23,231
                                                  -------       -------
Net income (loss)                                 $11,614       $(3,143)
                                                  -------       -------
Net income (loss) per share                       $  0.46       $ (0.14)
                                                  -------       -------
                                                  -------       -------

Net income (loss) per share is presented in the Company's financial 
statements under the primary basis as the effect of dilution under the fully 
diluted basis is not material.

                                       14
Order entered April 27, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-20-00204-CV

IN RE THE CITY OF MESQUITE, T EXAS, BRUCE ARCHER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS M AYOR OF THE CITY OF MESQUITE, ET AL, Relators

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 2 Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 104439-CC2

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ

of mandamus as moot to the extent relators complain of the amen ded temporary

restraining order, and we DENY the petition as premature to the extent relators

seek relief regarding their ju risdictional and venue challenges

.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
§ 1.852-3 Investment company taxable income. Section 852(b)(2) requires certain adjustments to be made to convert taxable income of the investment company to investment company taxable income, as follows: ( a ) The excess, if any, of the net long-term capital gain over the net short-term capital loss shall be excluded;
( b ) The net operating loss deduction provided in section 172 shall not be allowed;
( c ) The special deductions provided in part VIII (section 241 and following, except section 248), subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Code, shall not be allowed. Those not allowed are the deduction for partially tax-exempt interest provided by section 242, the deductions for dividends received provided by sections 243, 244, and 245, and the deduction for certain dividends paid provided by section 247. However, the deduction provided by section 248 (relating to organizational expenditures), otherwise allowable in computing taxable income, shall likewise be allowed in computing the investment company taxable income. See section 852(b)(1) and paragraph (a) of § 1.852-2 for treatment of the deduction for partially tax-exempt interest (provided by section 242) for purposes of computing the normal tax under section 11;
( d ) The deduction for dividends paid (as defined in section 561) shall be allowed, but shall be computed without regard to capital gains dividends (as defined in section 852(b)(3)(C) and paragraph (c) of § 1.852-4); and
( e ) The taxable income shall be computed without regard to section 443(b). Thus, the taxable income for a period of less than 12 months shall not be placed on an annual basis even though such short taxable year results from a change of accounting period.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 173 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 173

To extend the time of the Senate Ethics Study Commission for making its 
            findings and recommendations to the Leadership.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To extend the time of the Senate Ethics Study Commission for making its 
            findings and recommendations to the Leadership.

    Resolved, That S. Res. 111, which was adopted May 21, 1993, is 
hereby amended by striking ``December 31, 1993'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``March 1, 1994''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-5 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-5 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Servicing Agreement, dated July 15, 2016 (the Servicing Agreement), by and between Santander Consumer USA Inc. and Santander
Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC, and the related Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule (Publicly Registered Transactions), dated as of June 28, 2017 (the Second Amended and Restated Program Portfolio Schedule, together
with the Servicing Agreement, the Subservicing Agreement), during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the Subservicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the
subject of the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Jose RamirezName:

Jose RamirezTitle:

Vice President of Servicing for Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico, LLCDate:

March 30, 2018
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 19, 2016

No. 04-15-00473-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE—Division of Workers’ Compensation and 

Commissioner Ryan Brannan, in his official capacity,

Appellants

v.

Dale BRUMFIELD,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-07374

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On August 1, 2016, appellee filed a motion for rehearing en banc. The Court has 

considered the motion. Appellee’s motion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of August, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### Ronjee**Middleton v.** **State, 04-14-00678-CR** **(Tex. App.** **2014) Cou** **rt of** **Appeals of** **Texas Filed:** **December 31st,** **2014 Status:** **Precedential Docket** **Number: 04-14-00678-CR** **Fingerprint: b9907e254a35190f710ac5a0318ae24478850076** **The State** **of TexasAppellee/s** **r--3 en** **■ I. ro** **1, cn** **Fourth Court of** **Appeals San** **Antonio, Texas** **December 29,** **No. 04-14-00678-CR** **Ronjee MIDDLETON,** **Appellant v.** **THE STATE** **OF TEXAS,** **Appellee From the** **227th Judicial District** **Court, Bexar** **County, Texas** **Trial Court** **No. 2013CR0666** **Honorable Philip** **A. Kazen,** **Jr., Judge** **Presiding ORDER** **Appellant filed** **motion to** **unseal Defendant's** **Exhibit 1,** **the juror** **information sheets.** **January 15,** **2015**

### Regarding:**Ronjee Middleton** **v. State,** **04-14-00678-CR Concern** **for the** **Motion to** **Unseal Juror** **Information Sheets** **from Prior** **Trial To** **the Texas** **Court of** **Appeals:**

### As**juror on** **the trial** **that convicted** **and sentenced** **Ronjee Middleton** **for aggravated** **assault with** **a deadly weapon,** **became aware** **of his** **pending request** **to have** **the juror** **information sheets** **unsealed. My** **concern is** **the juror** **information sheets** **contain personally** **identifiable information** **such as my** **name, address,** **etc. Given** **Mr. Middleton's** **criminal and** **gang-related history,** **and his** **most-likely ongoing** **external contact** **with known** **gang members,** **this**

### raises**concern for** **my family's** **safety. Please ensure** **this letter** **of concern** **is filed** **with visibility** **to the** **appropriate court,** **and presented** **to any** **decision makers** **in this** **motion, including** **presiding judge,** **panel, jury,** **etc.**

### My**request is** **for denial** **of the** **motion to** **have the** **juror information** **sheets unsealed.** **Or, only** **demographically relevant information** **be extracted** **then released,** **not the** **entire sheets** **(only race,** **sex, age).** 

### The**following page** **is from** **the document** **that my** **awareness of** **this issue** **came from.** **Given this** **letter of** **concern may** **be made** **public, legal** **counsel has** **instructed me** **to not** **use my** **name; this** **may again** **put my** **family at** **risk. Thank** **you for** **understanding and** **deciding appropriately.** **2: ^'-~** **■■ , ■** **j-***