" ! COMMITTEE PRINT 113TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

NO. 2 

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 

LEGISLATIVE TEXT 

AND

JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT 

TO ACCOMPANY

H.R. 3304 

PUBLIC LAW 113–66 

DECEMBER 2013 

Printed for the use of the Committee on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARINGcongress.#13
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

86–280 

" ! COMMITTEE PRINT 113TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

NO. 2 

2014

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT 

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 

LEGISLATIVE TEXT 

AND

JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT 

TO ACCOMPANY

H.R. 3304 

PUBLIC LAW 113–66 

DECEMBER 2013 

Printed for the use of the Committee on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARINGcongress.#13
(II) 

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES 

ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS

HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, California, Chairman 

MAC THORNBERRY, Texas 

WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina 

J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia 

JEFF MILLER, Florida 

JOE WILSON, South Carolina 

FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey 

ROB BISHOP, Utah 

MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio 

JOHN KLINE, Minnesota 

MIKE ROGERS, Alabama 

TRENT FRANKS, Arizona 

BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania 

K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas 

DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado 

ROBERT J. WITTMAN, Virginia 

DUNCAN HUNTER, California 

JOHN FLEMING, Louisiana 

MIKE COFFMAN, Colorado 

E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia 

CHRISTOPHER P. GIBSON, New York 

VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri 

JOSEPH J. HECK, Nevada 

JON RUNYAN, New Jersey 

AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia 

STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi 

MO BROOKS, Alabama 

RICHARD B. NUGENT, Florida 

KRISTI L. NOEM, South Dakota 

PAUL COOK, California 

JIM BRIDENSTINE, Oklahoma 

BRAD R. WENSTRUP, Ohio 

JACKIE WALORSKI, Indiana 

ADAM SMITH, Washington 

LORETTA SANCHEZ, California 

MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina 

ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania 

ROBERT E. ANDREWS, New Jersey 

SUSAN A. DAVIS, California 

JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island 

RICK LARSEN, Washington 

JIM COOPER, Tennessee 

MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO, Guam 

JOE COURTNEY, Connecticut 

DAVID LOEBSACK, Iowa 

NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts 

JOHN GARAMENDI, California 

HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia 

COLLEEN W. HANABUSA, Hawaii 

JACKIE SPEIER, California 

RON BARBER, Arizona 

ANDRE ́ CARSON, Indiana 

CAROL SHEA-PORTER, New Hampshire 

DANIEL B. MAFFEI, New York 

DEREK KILMER, Washington 

JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas 

TAMMY DUCKWORTH, Illinois 

SCOTT H. PETERS, California 

WILLIAM L. ENYART, Illinois 

PETE P. GALLEGO, Texas 

MARC A. VEASEY, Texas 

ROBERT L. SIMMONS II, Staff Director 

ZACH STEACY, Director, Legislative Operations 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(III)

NOTE FROM THE DIRECTOR, LEGISLATIVE OPERATIONS

This committee print consists of the enrolled text and explanatory material for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2014 (H.R. 3304; Public Law 113–66). 

This Act and the material found in this committee print are the 

product of an agreement between the Chairman and Ranking 

Member of the House Committee on Armed Services and the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Armed 

Services on the reconciliation of H.R. 1960, as passed by the House 

of Representatives on June 14, 2013, and S. 1197, as reported out 

of committee on June 20, 2013. The Senate began consideration of 

S. 1197 on November 18, 2013, but did not complete consideration 

of S. 1197 and therefore was unable to initiate a formal conference 

with the House. 

In order to ensure the enactment of an annual defense bill by the 

end of the calendar year, the Chairman and Ranking Member of 

the House Committee on Armed Services and the Chairman and 

Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Armed Services 

agreed to reconcile the provisions of H.R. 1960 and S. 1197, including a number of amendments submitted during the Senate’s consideration of its bill which were cleared by both sides, but were not 

adopted by the Senate due to insufficient time. The negotiated 

agreement was brought to the House Floor in the form of an 

amendment to the Senate amendments to H.R. 3304, a Medal of 

Honor bill referred to the Committee on Armed Services, which had 

previously passed in the House and was then amended and passed 

by the Senate. On December 12, 2013, pursuant to H. Res. 441, 

which provided for the concurrence by the House in the Senate 

amendments to H.R. 3304, with an amendment, the House considered and passed the negotiated agreement by a vote of 350–69. On 

December 19, 2013, the Senate agreed to the House amendment to 

the Senate amendment, and passed the negotiated text, by recorded vote, 84–15. The President signed the legislation on December 26, 2013, and it became Public Law 113–66. 

Because the House and Senate negotiators were unable to convene a formal conference committee to reconcile the differences in 

the respective versions of the bill, there is no conference report and 

no formal ‘‘joint explanatory statement of the conference committee’’ for H.R. 3304. Instead, Chairman Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ 

McKeon submitted a ‘‘Joint Explanatory Statement to Accompany 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014’’ in 

the Congressional Record on December 12, 2013 (pages H7894– 

H8037). The text of the joint explanatory statement is included in 

this committee print. Section 4 of H.R. 3304 specifies that this explanatory material shall have the same effect with respect to the 

implementation of this legislation as if it were a joint explanatory 

statement of a committee of conference. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
IV

In this committee print, the provisions of H.R. 1960, the Housepassed version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2014, are generally referred to as ‘‘the House bill.’’ The provisions of S. 1197, the Senate Committee on Armed Services committee-reported version of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2014, and selected manager’s package amendments, 

are generally referred to as ‘‘the Senate committee-reported bill.’’ 

The final form of the agreements reached during negotiations between the House and the Senate are referred to as ‘‘the agreement.’’ 

The following pages are organized in the manner of a traditional 

conference report. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(V) 

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

LEGISLATIVE TEXT .............................................................................................. 1 

JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY THE NATIONAL 

DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 ...................... 509 

Compliance with rules of the House of Representatives and Senate regarding 

earmarks and congressionally directed spending items ................................... 509 

Summary of discretionary authorizations and budget implication ..................... 509 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS ................. 510 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT ................................................................................... 510 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 510 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101) .............................................. 510 

Subtitle B—Army Programs ............................................................................ 510 

Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program (sec. 

111) ......................................................................................................... 510 

Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for tactical 

vehicles (sec. 112) .................................................................................. 510 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs ............................................................................ 510 

CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program (sec. 121) .................................. 510 

Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface 

combatants (sec. 122) ............................................................................ 511 

Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program (sec. 

123) ......................................................................................................... 511 

Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship (sec. 

124) ......................................................................................................... 511 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs ..................................................................... 512 

Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC–135E 

aircraft (sec. 131) ................................................................................... 512 

Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft (sec. 132) .......... 512 

Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization 

program for C–130 aircraft (sec. 133) .................................................. 512 

Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J aircraft by the 

Air Force (sec. 134) ................................................................................ 513 

Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters ......................... 513 

Personal protection equipment procurement (sec. 141) ......................... 513 

Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements (sec. 142) ..................... 514 

Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global 

Hawk unmanned aircraft systems and A–10 aircraft (sec. 143) ........ 514 

MC–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft (sec. 144) ........................................................................................ 515 

Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers (sec. 

145) ......................................................................................................... 515 

Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety 

risks associated with ejection seats (sec. 146) ..................................... 516 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 516 

Modification of requirements to sustain Navy airborne intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities ..................................... 516 

Multiyear procurement authority for Ground-Based Interceptors ........ 518 

Sense of Senate on the United States helicopter industrial base ......... 518 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION .......... 518 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 518 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 201) .............................................. 518 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations ............ 518 

Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (sec. 211) ......................... 518 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

VI 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION—Continued 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations—Continued 

Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering and manufacturing phase (sec. 212) ....................................... 519 

Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrierlaunched surveillance and strike system program (sec. 213) ............. 519 

Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation (sec. 214) ............................................................................... 520 

Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of the Air Force (sec. 215) .......................................................... 520 

Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition program (sec. 216) .......................................................................... 520 

Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on availability 

of funds for noncompetitive procedures for offensive anti-surface 

warfare weapon contracts of the Navy (sec. 217) ................................ 520 

Review of software development for F–35 aircraft (sec. 218) ................ 521 

Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground system 

(sec. 219) ................................................................................................. 521 

Operationally responsive space (sec. 220) ............................................... 522 

Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance capabilities (sec. 221) ........................................... 522 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs ........................................................... 523 

Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system (sec. 231) ............................................................... 523 

Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program (sec. 232) .................. 523 

Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of certain missile 

defense systems; report on regional ballistic missile defense (sec. 

233) ......................................................................................................... 524 

Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system in the United States (sec. 234) .............................. 525 

Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the United 

States homeland (sec. 235) .................................................................... 525 

Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense sensor architectures (sec. 236) .................................................................................. 526 

Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system (sec. 

237) ......................................................................................................... 526 

Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense options 

(sec. 238) ................................................................................................. 527 

Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile defense matters (sec. 239) ......................................................................................... 527 

Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense burdensharing (sec. 240) ................................................................................... 528 

Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile defense 

capabilities (sec. 241) ............................................................................. 529 

Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II 

exoatmospheric kill vehicle (sec. 242) .................................................. 529 

Subtitle D—Reports ......................................................................................... 529 

Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program (sec. 251) ........................................................ 529 

Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter (sec. 252) .... 529 

Report on strategy to improve body armor (sec. 253) ............................. 529 

Subtitle E—Other Matters .............................................................................. 530 

Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory 

Board (sec. 261) ...................................................................................... 530 

Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense 

laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions (sec. 262) ......................................................................... 530 

Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology 

achievements (sec. 263) ......................................................................... 530 

Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection 

features during research and development of certain defense systems (sec. 264) ........................................................................................ 531 

Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of Defense (sec. 

265) ......................................................................................................... 531 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

VII 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION—Continued 

Subtitle E—Other Matters—Continued 

Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom’s Vanguard successor program (sec. 266) .................................... 531 

Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile project (sec. 267) ............................................................................. 531 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 532 

Conventional Prompt Global Strike program ......................................... 532 

Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement ...... 532 

Requirement to complete individual carbine testing .............................. 533 

Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser 

weapon system ....................................................................................... 533 

Analysis of alternatives for successor to Precision Tracking Space 

System .................................................................................................... 534 

Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative ...................................................................................................... 534 

Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the missile defenses of 

the United States ................................................................................... 534 

Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency .............................................. 534 

Report on powered rail system ................................................................. 535 

Report on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics scholarship program .......................................................................................... 535 

Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in defense experimental program to stimulate competitive research ............................ 536 

Briefing on power and energy research conducted at university-affiliated research centers ............................................................................. 536 

Approval of certain new uses of research, development, test, and 

evaluation land ...................................................................................... 536 

Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors 537 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ................................................ 538 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 538 

Operation and maintenance funding (sec. 301) ...................................... 538 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environment ............................................................ 538 

Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities 

relating to operational energy strategy (sec. 311) ............................... 538 

Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of 

the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid 

or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities (sec. 

312) ......................................................................................................... 538 

Reauthorization of Sikes Act (sec. 313) ................................................... 539 

Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn 

pits (sec. 314) ......................................................................................... 539 

Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels 

(sec. 315) ................................................................................................. 539 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment .......................................................... 540 

Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment (sec. 321) .. 540 

Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report (sec. 

322) ......................................................................................................... 540 

Consideration of Army arsenals’ capabilities to fulfill manufacturing 

requirements (sec. 323) ......................................................................... 540 

Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement 

of operating forces used to support overseas contingency operations 

(sec. 324) ................................................................................................. 541 

Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan (sec. 325) ................ 541 

Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility (sec. 

326) ......................................................................................................... 541 

Subtitle D—Reports ......................................................................................... 542 

Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit 

readiness (sec. 331) ................................................................................ 542 

Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for equipment 

readiness and strategic capability (sec. 332) ....................................... 542 

Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding information technology capital assets (sec. 333) ........................... 542 

Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention reporting 

requirements (sec. 334) ......................................................................... 543 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

VIII 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority ................................... 543 

Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores 

(sec. 341) ................................................................................................. 543 

Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration teams outside the United States (sec. 342) ....................... 543 

Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations Command National Capital Region (sec. 343) ............................................ 544 

Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative 

(sec. 344) ................................................................................................. 544 

Subtitle F—Other Matters ............................................................................... 545 

Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units (sec. 351) ............. 545 

Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms 

(sec. 352) ................................................................................................. 545 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 547 

Authorization of appropriations for the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group ............................................................................................... 547 

Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response Force ................... 547 

Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management related to Department of Defense readiness activities .......................... 547 

Exclusions from definition of ‘‘chemical substance’’ under Toxic Substances Control Act ................................................................................ 547 

Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement .................................................................................. 547 

Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels 

refineries ................................................................................................. 548 

Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation ........................ 548 

Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned and controlled by women and minorities required before conversion of certain functions to contractor performance ............................................. 548 

Ordnance related records review and reporting requirement for 

Vieques and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico .......................................... 548 

Authorization to institute a centralized, automated mail redirection 

system to improve the delivery of absentee ballots to military personnel serving outside the United States ............................................ 549 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS ............................... 549 

Subtitle A—Active Forces ................................................................................ 549 

End strengths for active forces (sec. 401) ................................................ 549 

Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels 

and in annual limitation on certain end strength reductions (sec. 

402) ......................................................................................................... 550 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces ............................................................................. 551 

End strengths for Selected Reserve (sec. 411) ........................................ 551 

End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves 

(sec. 412) ................................................................................................. 551 

End strengths for military technicians (dual status) (sec. 413) ............ 552 

Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians 

(sec. 414) ................................................................................................. 552 

Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active 

duty for operational support (sec. 415) ................................................ 553 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 553 

Military personnel (sec. 421) .................................................................... 553 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY ..................................................... 553 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally ............................................. 553 

Congressional notification requirements related to increases in number of general and flag officers on Active Duty or in joint duty 

assignments (sec. 501) ........................................................................... 553 

Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education upon 

original appointment as a commissioned officer (sec. 502) ................ 554 

Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and selective 

early removal of officers from reserve active-status list (sec. 503) .... 554 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management .............................................. 555 

Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve components 

(sec. 511) ................................................................................................. 555 

Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active 

and inactive National Guard (sec. 512) ............................................... 555 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

IX 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY—Continued 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management—Continued 

Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve component units and involuntary mobilizations of certain Reserves (sec. 

513) ......................................................................................................... 556 

Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component 

general and flag officers in an active status (sec. 514) ....................... 556 

Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands 

(sec. 515) ................................................................................................. 556 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities ........................................................ 557 

Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program about 

disability-related employment and education protections (sec. 521) . 557 

Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic stress 

disorder or traumatic brain injury before administrative separation 

(sec. 522) ................................................................................................. 557 

Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators (sec. 523) .......... 557 

Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation 

Plan (sec. 524) ........................................................................................ 558 

Provision of military service records to the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs in an electronic format (sec. 525) ............................................. 558 

Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System (sec. 526) .............. 558 

Subtitle D—Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault Prevention and Response and Related Reforms ..................................................... 559 

Modification of eligibility for appointment as judge on the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (sec. 531) ................... 559 

Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of 

the Armed Forces and chaplains of such members (sec. 532) ............ 559 

Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance with 

regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of members 

of the Armed Forces and their chaplains (sec. 533) ............................ 559 

Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense policy 

regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious services (sec. 534) ... 560 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training ............................................... 560 

Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for 

purposes of certain educational assistance under laws administered 

by the Secretary of Defense (sec. 541) ................................................. 560 

Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military occupational specialties with skills and training required for 

civilian certifications and licenses (sec. 542) ....................................... 561 

Report on the Troops to Teachers program (sec. 543) ............................ 561 

Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct student 

loans of certain members of the Armed Forces (sec. 544) .................. 561 

Subtitle F—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters .................................................................................................. 562 

Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that 

benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees (sec. 551) ..................................... 562 

Impact aid for children with severe disabilities (sec. 552) ..................... 562 

Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and 

secondary education component of Department of Defense education program (sec. 553) ...................................................................... 562 

Family support programs for immediate family members of members 

of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces (sec. 

554) ......................................................................................................... 563 

Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the armed forces 

in child custody determinations (sec. 555) ........................................... 563 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards ............................................................. 564 

Repeal of limitation on number of Medals of Honor that may be 

awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces (sec. 561) ........... 564 

Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding 

Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air 

Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal (sec. 562) .................. 564 

Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 

Guard Medal of Honor Roll requirements (sec. 563) .......................... 564 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

X 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY—Continued 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards—Continued 

Prompt replacement of military decorations (sec. 564) .......................... 564 

Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to victims of 

the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and 

at Fort Hood, Texas (sec. 565) .............................................................. 565 

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former members 

of the Armed Forces previously recommended for award of the 

Medal of Honor (sec. 566) ...................................................................... 565 

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of valor 

during the Vietnam War (sec. 567) ...................................................... 566 

Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross for acts 

of valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars (sec. 568) .................. 566 

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant 

Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War (sec. 

569) ......................................................................................................... 566 

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports ......................... 566 

Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation reports 

to include 360-degree assessment approach (sec. 571) ....................... 566 

Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members of the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B (sec. 572) ........... 567 

Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary schools (sec. 573) ....................................................................... 567 

Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality 

disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members from 

the Armed Forces (sec. 574) .................................................................. 567 

Subtitle I—Other Matters ................................................................................ 568 

Accounting for members of the armed forces and Department of 

Defense civilian employees listed as missing and related reports 

(sec. 581) ................................................................................................. 568 

Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing reports 

of certain recovered persons who were never placed in a missing 

status (sec. 582) ..................................................................................... 568 

Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation 

of North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville 

State College (sec. 583) ......................................................................... 569 

Review of security of military installations, including barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family residences (sec. 584) ....... 569 

Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military Cemeteries (sec. 585) ..................................................................... 569 

Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members 

of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans (sec. 586) ........ 570 

Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results (sec. 

587) ......................................................................................................... 570 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 571 

Designation of state student cadet corps as Department of Defense 

youth organizations ............................................................................... 571 

National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program ........................................... 571 

Authority for joint professional military education phase II instruction and credit to be offered and awarded through senior-level 

course of School of Advanced Military Studies of the United States 

Army Command and General Staff College ........................................ 571 

Authority for Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences 

to support undergraduate and other medical education and training programs for military medical personnel ...................................... 572 

Command responsibility and accountability for remains of members 

of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who die outside 

the United States ................................................................................... 572 

Expansion of eligibility for associate degree programs under the Community College of the Air Force ........................................................... 572 

Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating 

to correction of military records ........................................................... 573 

Coverage of military occupational specialties relating to military information technology under pilot program on receipt of civilian 

credentials for skills required for military occupational specialties .. 573 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XI 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted—Continued 

Report on data and information collected in connection with Department of Defense review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting 

service of female members of the Armed Forces ................................. 573 

Meetings with respect to religious liberty ............................................... 574 

Proof of period of military service for purposes of interest rate limitation under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act ................................. 574 

Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel ......................................... 574 

Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the 

Armed Forces who serve in combat zones ........................................... 575 

Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for active 

duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing .......................................... 575 

Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their families from 

military to civilian life ........................................................................... 576 

Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces, surviving 

spouses, and certain veterans and other improvements to the 

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act .......................................................... 576 

Department of Defense recognition of dependents of members of the 

Armed Forces who serve in combat zones ........................................... 577 

Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior Reserve 

Officers’ Training Corps Program ........................................................ 577 

Requirement to continue provision of tuition assistance for members 

of the Armed Forces .............................................................................. 577 

Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and 

Marine Corps serving in combat zones ................................................ 577 

Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition 

of military dependent students ............................................................. 577 

Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations or 

medals ..................................................................................................... 578 

Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge ................................. 578 

Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal 

of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta ........ 578 

Required gold content for Medal of Honor .............................................. 578 

Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations ................................... 578 

Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal 

of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht ........................ 579 

Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues ... 579 

Commission on Service to the Nation ...................................................... 579 

Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain 

members of the Armed Forces killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica .......................................................................................................... 580 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS .......... 580 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances ..................................................................... 580 

Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of 

basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances (sec. 601) . 580 

Recognition of additional means by which members of the National 

Guard called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less 

may initially report for duty for entitlement to basic pay (sec. 

602) ......................................................................................................... 580 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays ................................... 580 

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for 

reserve forces (sec. 611) ......................................................................... 580 

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for 

health care professionals (sec. 612) ...................................................... 581 

One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear 

officers (sec. 613) .................................................................................... 581 

One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated 

special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities (sec. 614) .............. 581 

One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 

37 bonuses and special pays (sec. 615) ................................................ 582 

One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members 

of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency (sec. 616) ................................................................................... 582 

Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (sec. 617) ....... 582 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XII 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS—Continued 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays—Continued 

Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned officers 

in the reserve components (sec. 618) .................................................... 582 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances ...................................... 583 

Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense 

travel and transportation authorities in connection with reform 

of such authorities (sec. 621) ................................................................ 583 

Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits ......................... 583 

Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case of 

members whose retired pay is computed using high-three (sec. 

631) ......................................................................................................... 583 

Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early retirement 

credit earned for significant periods of active Federal status or 

active duty (sec. 632) ............................................................................. 583 

Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other dependents 

(sec. 633) ................................................................................................. 583 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality 

Benefits and Operations ............................................................................... 584 

Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals (sec. 641) .................................................... 584 

Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities for 

purposes of certain civil service laws (sec. 642) .................................. 584 

Subtitle F—Other Matters ............................................................................... 585 

Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of 

human remains that were retained by the Department of Defense 

for forensic pathology investigation (sec. 651) ..................................... 585 

Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional compensation and other transitional benefits to dependents of members 

separated for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice 

(sec. 652) ................................................................................................. 585 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 585 

Fiscal year 2014 increase in military basic pay ...................................... 585 

Correction of citation for extension of reimbursement authority for 

travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance and additional one-year extension ........................... 586 

Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable 

materials for resale in commissary and exchange store systems ...... 586 

Exchange store system participation in the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh ...................................................................... 586 

Effect on division of retired pay of election to receive combat-related 

special compensation after previous election to receive concurrent 

retirement and disability compensation .............................................. 586 

Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of the 

reserve components as veterans ........................................................... 587 

Survey of military pay and benefits preferences .................................... 587 

Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available basis for 

disabled veterans with a service-connected, permanent disability 

rated as total .......................................................................................... 587 

Preservation of retiree dependent status for certain dependents upon 

death or permanent incapacitation of the retired member on whom 

dependent status is based ..................................................................... 588 

Enhanced role for the Department of Justice under the Military 

Lending Act ............................................................................................ 588 

Extension of ongoing pilot programs under temporary Army incentive 

to provide additional recruitment incentives ....................................... 588 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS ......................................................... 589 

Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits .............................. 589 

Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime (sec. 701) .................................................... 589 

Mental health care treatment through telemedicine (sec. 702) ............. 589 

Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of 

members of the Armed Forces with urotrauma (sec. 703) ................. 590 

Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the Armed 

Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder (sec. 704) ....................................................................................... 590 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XIII 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS—Continued 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration ....................................................... 591 

Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to 

enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to other 

nonprofit entities (sec. 711) ................................................................... 591 

Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in 

military medical treatment facilities (sec. 712) ................................... 591 

Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs (sec. 713) ............................................... 591 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters ......................................................... 593 

Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers 

of the reserve components (sec. 721) .................................................... 593 

Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain Centers 

of Excellence (sec. 722) .......................................................................... 593 

Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries (sec. 

723) ......................................................................................................... 593 

Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to members 

of the Armed Forces and veterans (sec. 724) ....................................... 594 

Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program 

and availability of compounded pharmaceuticals (sec. 725) .............. 594 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 595 

Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces ............. 595 

Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed 

Forces ...................................................................................................... 595 

Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under 

TRICARE ................................................................................................ 595 

Cooperative health care agreements between the military departments and non-military health care entities ....................................... 595 

Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic health 

record program ....................................................................................... 596 

Mental health support for military personnel and families .................. 596 

Research regarding hydrocephalus .......................................................... 597 

Traumatic brain injury research .............................................................. 597 

Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple negative breast 

cancer ...................................................................................................... 597 

Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for members of the 

Armed Forces and their families .......................................................... 597 

Preliminary mental health assessments ................................................. 598 

Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan .......................... 598 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND 

RELATED MATTERS ......................................................................................... 598 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management .......................................... 598 

Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense 

laboratories (sec. 801) ............................................................................ 598 

Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for 

contract services (sec. 802) .................................................................... 598 

Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts (sec. 803) .. 599 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, 

and Limitations ............................................................................................. 599 

Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation (sec. 811) ............................................................................... 599 

Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports 

(sec. 812) ................................................................................................. 599 

Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension 

or debarment (sec. 813) ......................................................................... 600 

Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items (sec. 814) ............................................................. 600 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs ... 600 

Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense acquisition programs (sec. 821) ........................................................................ 600 

Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone B 

approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a 

space program (sec. 822) ....................................................................... 601 

Additional responsibility for product support managers for major 

weapon systems (sec. 823) ..................................................................... 601 

Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes for 

the acquisition of weapons systems (sec. 824) ..................................... 601 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XIV 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND 

RELATED MATTERS—Continued 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency 

Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan .............................................................. 602 

Prohibition on contracting with the enemy (sec. 831) ............................ 602 

Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced 

in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan (sec. 

832) ......................................................................................................... 602 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 603 

Modification of reporting requirement for Department of Defense 

business system acquisition programs when initial operating capability is not achieved within 5 years of Milestone A approval ........... 603 

Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to multiyear 

defense acquisitions to be specifically authorized by law ................... 603 

Report on program manager training and experience ........................... 603 

Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts .............................. 604 

Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be given 

at least equal importance as technical or other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense contracts ............................... 604 

Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources .................. 605 

Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan .......... 606 

Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities ............................. 606 

Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned small businesses ...................................................................................................... 607 

Revisions to requirements relating to justification and approval of 

sole-source defense contracts ................................................................ 607 

Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to take into account sourcing laws ............................................... 607 

Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in the United 

States ...................................................................................................... 607 

Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial 

entry into the Armed Forces ................................................................. 607 

Implementation by Department of Defense of certain recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States on oversight 

of pensions offered by Department contractors ................................... 608 

Report on the elimination of improper payments ................................... 609 

Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act ...................... 609 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................... 610 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management ......................................... 610 

Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise architecture (sec. 901) ............................................................. 610 

Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government tenants onto military installations in the United States (sec. 

902) ......................................................................................................... 610 

Clarification of authority for the command acquisition executive of 

the United States Special Operations Command (sec. 903) ............... 610 

Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters 

(sec. 904) ................................................................................................. 611 

Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and education 

(sec. 905) ................................................................................................. 612 

Modification of reference to major Department of Defense headquarters activities instruction (sec. 906) .............................................. 612 

Personnel security (sec. 907) .................................................................... 612 

Subtitle B—Space Activities ............................................................................ 613 

National security space satellite reporting policy (sec. 911) .................. 613 

National security space defense and protection (sec. 912) ..................... 614 

Space acquisition strategy (sec. 913) ....................................................... 614 

Space control mission report (sec. 914) ................................................... 615 

Responsive launch (sec. 915) .................................................................... 615 

Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program (sec. 916) .... 615 

Eagle Vision system (sec. 917) ................................................................. 616 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities ......... 616 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XV 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT—Continued 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities— 

Continued 

Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial 

activities as security for intelligence collection activities (sec. 921) .. 616 

Department of Defense intelligence priorities (sec. 922) ....................... 617 

Defense Clandestine Service (sec. 923) .................................................... 617 

Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation (sec. 924) 618 

Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters ....................................................... 618 

Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense 

tactical data link systems (sec. 931) .................................................... 618 

Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States Cyber 

Command (sec. 932) ............................................................................... 618 

Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense (sec. 

933) ......................................................................................................... 620 

Modification of requirement for Report on Department of Defense 

Progress in Defending the Department and the Defense Industrial 

Base from Cyber Events (sec. 934) ....................................................... 620 

Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense (sec. 935) ............................................................. 620 

Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses (sec. 936) . 621 

Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the Department of Defense (sec. 937) .................................................................... 621 

Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities (sec. 

938) ......................................................................................................... 622 

Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems and 

tactical communications systems (sec. 939) ......................................... 623 

Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons (sec. 940) ........................ 623 

Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace (sec. 941) ............ 623 

National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance 

Education matters (sec. 942) ................................................................ 623 

Subtitle E—Total Force Management ............................................................ 624 

Reviews of appropriate manpower performance (sec. 951) .................... 624 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 625 

Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department 

of the Navy and Marine Corps ............................................................. 625 

Under Secretary of Defense for Management ......................................... 625 

Report on strategic importance of United States military installation 

of the U.S. Pacific Command ................................................................ 625 

Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory Panel from 

Department of the Navy to National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration ....................................................................................... 626 

Navy broad-area maritime surveillance aircraft .................................... 626 

Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative cybersecurity activities with China ................................................................................. 626 

Small business cybersecurity solutions office ......................................... 626 

Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of government oversight of 

functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions ........................................................................................................ 627 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS ..................................................................... 627 

Budget Item ...................................................................................................... 627 

Funding for New START Treaty preparatory activities ........................ 627 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters ........................................................................ 627 

General transfer authority (sec. 1001) .................................................... 627 

Budgetary effects of this Act (sec. 1002) ................................................. 628 

Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements 

(sec. 1003) ............................................................................................... 628 

Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization (sec. 1004) ....... 628 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities .............................................................. 628 

Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (sec. 1011) ....................................... 628 

Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to 

law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities 

(sec. 1012) ............................................................................................... 629 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XVI 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS—Continued 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities—Continued 

Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support 

for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments (sec. 

1013) ....................................................................................................... 629 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards ...................................................... 630 

Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the construction of naval vessels (sec. 1021) ................................................... 630 

Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no 

cost to the Navy (sec. 1022) .................................................................. 630 

Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga 

class cruisers or dock landing ships (sec. 1023) .................................. 630 

Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions (sec. 1024) ..... 631 

Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships 

(sec. 1025) ............................................................................................... 631 

Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment (sec. 

1026) ....................................................................................................... 631 

Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of the 

strike forces of the Navy (sec. 1027) .................................................... 632 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism ......................................................................... 632 

Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military 

commissions (sec. 1031) ......................................................................... 632 

Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship 

Program reporting requirement (sec. 1032) ......................................... 632 

Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the 

United States to house detainees transferred from United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1033) ............................ 633 

Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba (sec. 1034) ..................................................................................... 633 

Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1035) ................ 633 

Report on information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, 

Afghanistan (sec. 1036) ......................................................................... 634 

Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo 

(sec. 1037) ............................................................................................... 634 

Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, 

and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen (sec. 1038) ................................................................... 635 

Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo if transferred to the United States (sec. 1039) .......................... 635 

Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations ..................................................... 636 

Congressional notification of sensitive military operations (sec. 1041) 636 

Counterterrorism operational briefings (sec. 1042) ................................ 636 

Report on process for determining targets of lethal or capture operations (sec. 1043) .................................................................................... 636 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces .............................................................................. 637 

Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable 

aircraft based in Europe (sec. 1051) ..................................................... 637 

Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, 

and Communications System (sec. 1052) ............................................. 637 

Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of Nuclear Weapons Council (sec. 1053) ....................................................... 638 

Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, 

and nuclear weapons command and control system (sec. 1054) ........ 638 

Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad (sec. 1055) .......................... 638 

Implementation of New START Treaty (sec. 1056) ................................ 639 

Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable 

reentry vehicles (sec. 1057) ................................................................... 640 

Report on New START Treaty (sec. 1058) .............................................. 640 

Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares 

Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report (sec. 

1059) ....................................................................................................... 641 

Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms reductions with 

the Russian Federation (sec. 1060) ...................................................... 641 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XVII 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS—Continued 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces—Continued 

Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control treaty 

obligations (sec. 1061) ............................................................................ 641 

Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the nuclear 

forces of the United States (sec. 1062) ................................................. 642 

Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations ............................... 642 

Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze 

captured records (sec. 1071) .................................................................. 642 

Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic spectrum 

(sec. 1072) ............................................................................................... 642 

Extension of authority to provide military transportation services 

to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate (sec. 1073) ............................................................................. 643 

Notification of modifications to Army force structure (sec. 1074) ......... 643 

Aircraft joint training (sec. 1075) ............................................................. 644 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports .................................................................... 644 

Online availability of reports submitted to Congress (sec. 1081) .......... 644 

Oversight of combat support agencies (sec. 1082) .................................. 644 

Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination 

relating to humanitarian demining technology (sec. 1083) ................ 644 

Repeal and modification of reporting requirements (sec. 1084) ............ 645 

Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department of Defense efficiencies (sec. 1085) ............................................... 645 

Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces 

and United States Special Operations Command (sec. 1086) ............ 645 

Reports on unmanned aircraft systems (sec. 1087) ................................ 645 

Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department 

of Defense (sec. 1088) ............................................................................ 646 

Civil Air Patrol (sec. 1089) ....................................................................... 646 

Subtitle I—Other Matters ................................................................................ 646 

Technical and clerical amendments (sec. 1091) ...................................... 646 

Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated 

information system programs (sec. 1092) ............................................ 646 

Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue nonpremium aviation insurance (sec. 1093) .............................................. 646 

Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and authority 

to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for certain nongovernmental personnel (sec. 1094) ................................................................. 647 

Amendments to certain national commissions (sec. 1095) ..................... 647 

Strategy for future military information operations capabilities (sec. 

1096) ....................................................................................................... 648 

Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security (sec. 1097) ....... 648 

Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire suppression 

and other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force (sec. 1098) 648 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 649 

Department of Defense Readiness Restoration Fund ............................. 649 

Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-Narcotic 

Program .................................................................................................. 649 

Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards ..................................................... 649 

Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States 

for emergency or critical medical treatment ....................................... 650 

Assessment of affiliates and adherents of Al-Qaeda outside the 

United States ......................................................................................... 650 

Designation of Department of Defense senior official for facilitating 

the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba ............................................................... 651 

Summary of information relating to individuals detained at Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist groups ........................ 651 

Procedures governing United States citizens apprehended inside the 

United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military 

Force ....................................................................................................... 651 

Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational facilities for individuals detained at Guantanamo .............................................................. 651 

Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen ...................................................................................... 651 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XVIII 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted—Continued 

Department of Defense representation in dispute resolution regarding surrender of Department of Defense bands of electromagnetic 

frequencies .............................................................................................. 652 

Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People’s Republic 

of China .................................................................................................. 652 

Cost estimates for nuclear weapons ........................................................ 652 

Report on plans for the disposition of the Mine Resistant Ambush 

Protected vehicle fleet ........................................................................... 653 

Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation activities ..... 653 

Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 Quadrennial 

Defense Review ...................................................................................... 653 

Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency operation 

plan information to Congress ............................................................... 654 

Report on U.S. citizens subject to military detention ............................ 654 

Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation 

Enduring Freedom ................................................................................. 654 

Report on air transportation of supplies for the United States ............ 654 

Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces from 

nonprofit organizations ......................................................................... 655 

Protection of tier one task critical assets from electromagnetic pulse 

and high-powered microwave systems ................................................. 655 

Compliance of military departments with minimum safe staffing 

standards ................................................................................................ 656 

Determination and disclosure of transportation costs incurred by Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United States . 657 

Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the Tethered 

Aerostat Radar System ......................................................................... 657 

Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities ..................................................................................................... 657 

Unmanned aircraft systems and National Airspace .............................. 658 

Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain federal 

property .................................................................................................. 658 

Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices ............................... 658 

Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard and Military 

Reserve force .......................................................................................... 659 

Access of employees of congressional support offices to Department 

of Defense facilities ................................................................................ 659 

Cost of wars ............................................................................................... 659 

Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign languages and 

cultures in the building of partner capacity ........................................ 660 

Sense of Congress regarding preservation of second amendment 

rights of active duty military personnel stationed or residing in 

the District of Columbia ........................................................................ 660 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS ................................................. 660 

One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian 

employees working overseas (sec. 1101) .............................................. 660 

One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, 

benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat 

zone (sec. 1102) ...................................................................................... 661 

Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees of the Department of Defense (sec. 1103) ............................... 661 

Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to 

Department of Defense employees (sec. 1104) .................................... 661 

Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation 

(SMART) Defense Education Program and assessment of STEM 

and other programs (sec. 1105) ............................................................ 661 

Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel (sec. 1106) ................................................................................... 662 

Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense 

research and engineering facilities (sec. 1107) .................................... 662 

Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian 

personnel (sec. 1108) ............................................................................. 663 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XIX 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS—Continued 

Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for 

civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured 

members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1109) ........................................... 663 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 663 

Flexibility in employment and compensation of civilian faculty at 

certain additional Department of Defense schools .............................. 663 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS .......................... 664 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training .............................................................. 664 

Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build 

the capacity of foreign military forces (sec. 1201) ............................... 664 

Global Security Contingency Fund (sec. 1202) ....................................... 665 

Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces 

with military and other security forces of friendly foreign countries 

(sec. 1203) ............................................................................................... 666 

Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign 

countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction (sec. 1204) ............................................................................... 666 

Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program (sec. 

1205) ....................................................................................................... 667 

United States security and assistance strategies in Africa (sec. 1206) 668 

Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations (sec. 1207) .................................................................................... 668 

Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the 

Lord’s Resistance Army (sec. 1208) ...................................................... 669 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq .............. 670 

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan (sec. 

1211) ....................................................................................................... 670 

One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan (sec. 1212) ............................................................. 670 

Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations 

for support provided to United States military operations (sec. 

1213) ....................................................................................................... 670 

Extension and modification of authority to support operations and 

activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (sec. 1214) ... 671 

One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan (sec. 

1215) ....................................................................................................... 672 

Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed 

by Afghanistan (sec. 1216) .................................................................... 672 

Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces supporting or participating with the United States Armed Forces (sec. 

1217) ....................................................................................................... 673 

Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program (sec. 1218) ..................................................................................... 673 

Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program (sec. 

1219) ....................................................................................................... 673 

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014 .............................. 674 

Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities 

and finances (sec. 1221) ........................................................................ 674 

Completion of accelerated transition of security responsibility from 

United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security 

Forces (sec. 1222) ................................................................................... 674 

Defense Intelligence Plan (sec. 1223) ...................................................... 674 

Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan (sec. 1224) ...................................................................................... 675 

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran ............................................................. 675 

Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation 

Council countries (sec. 1231) ................................................................ 675 

Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran (sec. 

1232) ....................................................................................................... 676 

Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations 

in Southwest Asia (sec. 1233) ............................................................... 676 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters ......................................................... 676 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XX 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS—Continued 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters—Continued 

Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities (sec. 1241) ............................................................... 676 

Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic 

of China (sec. 1242) ............................................................................... 677 

Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond 

to an attack or other contingency against United States diplomatic 

facilities overseas (sec. 1243) ................................................................ 677 

Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces 

Coordination Centers (sec. 1244) .......................................................... 678 

Additional reports on military and security developments involving 

the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (sec. 1245) ....................... 678 

Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the Russian 

Federation and limitations on providing certain missile defense 

information to the Russian Federation (sec. 1246) ............................. 679 

Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament 

Act (sec. 1247) ........................................................................................ 679 

Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile proliferation 

(sec. 1248) ............................................................................................... 679 

Reports on international agreements relating to the Department of 

Defense (sec. 1249) ................................................................................ 680 

Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations and related NATO agreements (sec. 1250) ................................. 680 

Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to ballistic missile defense (sec. 1251) ........................................................... 680 

Rule of construction (sec. 1252) ................................................................ 681 

Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade 

Treaty (sec. 1253) ................................................................................... 681 

Report on military and security developments involving the Russian 

Federation (sec. 1254) ............................................................................ 681 

Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements 

with Rosoboronexport (sec. 1255) ......................................................... 682 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 682 

Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and 

civic aid programs of the Department of Defense ............................... 682 

Special Immigrant Visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies ................ 683 

Sense of Congress on commencement of new long-term nation building or large-scale infrastructure development projects in Afghanistan ......................................................................................................... 683 

Sense of Congress ...................................................................................... 683 

Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations 

or bases in Afghanistan ......................................................................... 683 

Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf .......................... 684 

Statement of policy on condemning the Government of Iran for its 

state-sponsored persecution of its Baha’i minority ............................. 684 

Technical correction relating to funding for NATO Special Operations 

Headquarters ......................................................................................... 684 

Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national security .. 684 

Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean peninsula .......................................................................................................... 685 

Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia ................ 685 

Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria .............................................. 685 

Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction Engagement 

activities and United States contributions to the Comprehensive 

Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty ....................................................................... 685 

Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation between the 

United States and Burma ..................................................................... 685 

Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces in Europe ......................................................................................................... 686 

Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People’s Republic 

of China .................................................................................................. 686 

Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan .............................. 687 

Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah ............................. 687 

Combating crime through intelligence capabilities ................................ 687 

War Powers of Congress ........................................................................... 687 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXI 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS—Continued 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted—Continued 

Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States citizens ................... 688 

Sale of F–16 fighter aircraft to Taiwan ................................................... 688 

Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of Israel to 

self-defense ............................................................................................. 688 

Report on collective and national security implications of Central 

Asian and South Caucasus energy development ................................. 688 

Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other riot control 

items ....................................................................................................... 689 

Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan military .................... 689 

Israel’s right to self-defense ...................................................................... 689 

Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full implementation of 

United States and international sanctions on Iran and urging the 

President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation ....................................................................................................... 689 

Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons programs of Iran 

and North Korea .................................................................................... 690 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ....................................... 690 

Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds (sec. 

1301) ....................................................................................................... 690 

Funding allocations (sec. 1302) ................................................................ 690 

Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the cooperative threat reduction program (sec. 1303) ............................................ 691 

Strategy to modernize Cooperative Threat Reduction and prevent 

the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region (sec. 1304) ............ 691 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ........................................................... 691 

Subtitle A—Military Programs ........................................................................ 691 

Working capital funds (sec. 1401) ............................................................ 691 

National Defense Sealift Fund (sec. 1402) .............................................. 691 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (sec. 1403) ....... 692 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide (sec. 

1404) ....................................................................................................... 692 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1405) ..................................................... 692 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1406) ........................................................ 692 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile ......................................................... 692 

Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic 

and critical materials supply (sec. 1411) ............................................. 692 

Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense 

Stockpile (sec. 1412) .............................................................................. 693 

Subtitle C—Other Matters .............................................................................. 693 

Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of DefenseDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration 

Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois 

(sec. 1421) ............................................................................................... 693 

Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home 

(sec. 1422) ............................................................................................... 693 

Cemeterial expenses (sec. 1423) ............................................................... 693 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ................................................... 693 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations .............................. 693 

Purpose (sec. 1501) .................................................................................... 693 

Procurement (sec. 1502) ............................................................................ 694 

Research, development, test, and evaluation (sec. 1503) ....................... 694 

Operation and maintenance (sec. 1504) .................................................. 694 

Military personnel (sec. 1505) .................................................................. 694 

Working capital funds (sec. 1506) ............................................................ 694 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide (sec. 

1507) ....................................................................................................... 695 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1508) ..................................................... 695 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1509) ........................................................ 695 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters ........................................................................ 695 

Treatment as additional authorizations (sec. 1521) ............................... 695 

Special transfer authority (sec. 1522) ...................................................... 695 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters .................................. 695 

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (sec. 1531) ........................................ 695 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXII 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS—Continued 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters—Continued 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund (sec. 1532) ................. 696 

Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization 

(sec. 1533) ............................................................................................... 696 

Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability 

Operations in Afghanistan (sec. 1534) ................................................. 697 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 697 

National Defense Sealift Fund ................................................................. 697 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense .......................... 697 

Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support 

for Operation Observant Compass ....................................................... 697 

Report on U.S. force levels and costs of military operations in Afghanistan ................................................................................................ 698 

Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund to 

acquire certain aircraft, vehicles, and equipment ............................... 698 

TITLE XVI—INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS ..................................................... 698 

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base Matters ................................................ 698 

Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of 

Department of Defense (sec. 1601) ....................................................... 698 

Foreign space activities (sec. 1602) .......................................................... 698 

Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program (sec. 1603) ............ 699 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns .......................... 699 

Advancing small business growth (sec. 1611) ......................................... 699 

Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (sec. 1612) .................................................... 700 

Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business concerns (sec. 1613) ....................................................................... 700 

Credit for certain small business subcontractors (sec. 1614) ................. 700 

Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts 

(sec. 1615) ............................................................................................... 700 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 701 

Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of meals 

ready-to-eat ............................................................................................ 701 

Program to provide federal contracts to early stage small businesses . 701 

GAO study on subcontracting reporting systems ................................... 701 

TITLE XVII—SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND 

RELATED REFORMS ......................................................................................... 702 

Subtitle A—Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice ............................. 702 

Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1701) ...................................... 702 

Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1702) ........................................................................................ 702 

Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes (sec. 1703) . 703 

Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense 

in presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim, or a Sexual 

Assault Victim Advocate (sec. 1704) .................................................... 703 

Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of 

such offenses by general courts-martial (sec. 1705) ............................ 703 

Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial process 

(sec. 1706) ............................................................................................... 704 

Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice (sec. 1707) ............................................................... 704 

Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor relating 

to character and military service of the accused in rule on initial 

disposition of offenses (sec. 1708) ......................................................... 705 

Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed Forces for 

reporting a criminal offense (sec. 1709) ............................................... 705 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code ................ 705 

Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who have 

been convicted of certain sexual offenses (sec. 1711) .......................... 705 

Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of request for permanent change of station or unit transfer by victim of sexual assault (sec. 1712) ........................................... 705 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXIII 

TITLE XVII—SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND 

RELATED REFORMS—Continued 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code—Continued 

Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of 

the Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of committing 

a sexual assault or related offense (sec. 1713) .................................... 706 

Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions (sec. 1714) ....................................................................... 706 

Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel 

actions taken in response to making protected communications 

regarding sexual assault (sec. 1715) .................................................... 707 

Designation and availability of Special Victims’ Counsel for victims 

of sex-related offenses (sec. 1716) ......................................................... 707 

Subtitle C—Amendments to Other Laws ....................................................... 707 

Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing and responding to sexual assaults (sec. 1721) ............................................... 707 

Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent panel 

on assessment of military response systems to sexual assault (sec. 

1722) ....................................................................................................... 708 

Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports 

and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members 

of the Armed Forces (sec. 1723) ............................................................ 708 

Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by members 

of the National Guard and Reserves (sec. 1724) ................................. 708 

Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual assault 

prevention and response personnel and required availability of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (sec. 1725) ............................................ 709 

Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention 

and response program (sec. 1726) ........................................................ 709 

Subtitle D—Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports ..................................... 711 

Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military 

Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases (sec. 1731) . 711 

Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative 

practices in response to allegations of Uniform Code of Military 

Justice violations (sec. 1732) ................................................................. 712 

Review of training and education provided members of the Armed 

Forces on sexual assault prevention and response (sec. 1733) .......... 712 

Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on the 

retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual 

assaults involving members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1734) ............ 713 

Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases (sec. 1735) ............................. 713 

Subtitle E—Other Matters .............................................................................. 714 

Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members 

of the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training 

(sec. 1741) ............................................................................................... 714 

Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses involving 

members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1742) ........................................... 714 

Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted 

report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the 

Armed Forces (sec. 1743) ...................................................................... 715 

Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses 

for trial by court-martial (sec. 1744) .................................................... 715 

Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related offenses 

in personnel service records of members of the Armed Forces (sec. 

1745) ....................................................................................................... 715 

Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies (sec. 

1746) ....................................................................................................... 716 

Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces are 

completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National 

Security Positions (sec. 1747) ............................................................... 716 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions ...................................................... 717 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXIV 

TITLE XVII—SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND 

RELATED REFORMS—Continued 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions—Continued 

Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for command 

climate free of retaliation (sec. 1751) ................................................... 717 

Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain sexual 

misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice 

through courts-martial (sec. 1752) ....................................................... 717 

Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of members of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related offenses (sec. 

1753) ....................................................................................................... 717 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 718 

Servicemembers’ accountability, rights, and responsibilities training . 718 

Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of separation 

of members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted reports 

of sexual assault .................................................................................... 718 

Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military justice 

process .................................................................................................... 718 

Enhancement to requirements for availability of information on sexual assault prevention and response resources ................................... 718 

Health welfare inspections ....................................................................... 719 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS ................... 719 

Summary and explanation of funding tables .......................................... 719 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 719 

Short title (sec. 2001) ................................................................................ 719 

Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified 

by law (sec. 2002) ................................................................................... 719 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 720 

Effective date ............................................................................................. 720 

TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ............................................. 720 

Summary .................................................................................................... 720 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 720 

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2101) ....................................................................................................... 720 

Family housing (sec. 2102) ....................................................................... 720 

Authorization of appropriations, Army (sec. 2103) ................................. 721 

Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military Academy, New York (sec. 2104) ................................................... 721 

Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project 

(sec. 2105) ............................................................................................... 721 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project 

(sec. 2106) ............................................................................................... 721 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project 

(sec. 2107) ............................................................................................... 722 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects (sec. 

2108) ....................................................................................................... 722 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec. 

2109) ....................................................................................................... 722 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 722 

Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill, 

Dahlonega, Georgia ............................................................................... 722 

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project ................. 723 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 723 

Summary .................................................................................................... 723 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 723 

Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2201) ....................................................................................................... 723 

Family housing (sec. 2202) ....................................................................... 724 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2203) .................. 724 

Authorization of appropriations, Navy (sec. 2204) ................................. 724 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project 

(sec. 2205) ............................................................................................... 724 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project 

(sec. 2206) ............................................................................................... 724 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec. 

2207) ....................................................................................................... 725 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 725 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXV 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION—Continued 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted—Continued 

Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 

2014 project ............................................................................................ 725 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ................................ 725 

Summary .................................................................................................... 725 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 726 

Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2301) ....................................................................................................... 726 

Family housing (sec. 2302) ....................................................................... 726 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2303) .................. 727 

Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (sec. 2304) .......................... 727 

Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 

2014 project (sec. 2305) ......................................................................... 727 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project 

(sec. 2306) ............................................................................................... 727 

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project (sec. 

2307) ....................................................................................................... 728 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION .............. 728 

Budget Items ..................................................................................................... 728 

Summary .................................................................................................... 728 

U.S. Special Operations Command Military Construction Requirements ...................................................................................................... 729 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations .................................................. 730 

Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2401) ................................................................................. 730 

Authorized energy conservation projects (sec. 2402) .............................. 730 

Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (sec. 2403) ............. 731 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations ................................ 731 

Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide (sec. 2411) ............................................................... 731 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY 

INVESTMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................. 731 

Summary .................................................................................................... 731 

Legislative Provisions Adopted ........................................................................ 731 

Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2501) ....................................................................................................... 731 

Authorization of appropriations, NATO (sec. 2502) ............................... 732 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES ........................ 732 

Summary .................................................................................................... 732 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations ... 732 

Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2601) ................................................................................. 732 

Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2602) ............................................................................................... 732 

Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction 

and land acquisition projects (sec. 2603) ............................................. 733 

Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2604) ................................................................................. 733 

Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2605) ................................................................................. 733 

Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve (sec. 

2606) ....................................................................................................... 733 

Subtitle B—Other Matters .............................................................................. 734 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project 

(sec. 2611) ............................................................................................... 734 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec. 

2612) ....................................................................................................... 734 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES ............ 734 

Summary .................................................................................................... 734 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations ................................................. 734 

Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account (sec. 2701) ..................................................................................... 734 

Subtitle B—Other Matters .............................................................................. 735 

Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure 

(BRAC) round (sec. 2711) ...................................................................... 735 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXVI 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES—Continued 

Subtitle B—Other Matters—Continued 

Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability of military health care in National Capital Region (sec. 

2712) ....................................................................................................... 735 

Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative 

(sec. 2713) ............................................................................................... 735 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 735 

Consideration of the value of services provided by a local community 

to the Armed Forces as part of the economic analysis in making 

base realignment or closure decisions .................................................. 735 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS ....... 736 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing 

Changes ......................................................................................................... 736 

Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified minor 

military construction authority for laboratory revitalization projects 

(sec. 2801) ............................................................................................... 736 

Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with 

private developers of housing (sec. 2802) ............................................ 736 

Military construction standards to improve force protection (sec. 

2803) ....................................................................................................... 737 

Application of cash payments received for utilities and services (sec. 

2804) ....................................................................................................... 737 

Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing investment authority (sec. 2805) .................................................... 737 

Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization projects (sec. 2806) ......................................................................... 737 

Policies and requirements regarding overseas military construction 

and closure and realignment of United States military installations 

in foreign countries (sec. 2807) ............................................................. 737 

Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use 

operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas outside the United States (sec. 2808) ................................ 738 

Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of 

responsibility (sec. 2809) ....................................................................... 739 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration ............................. 739 

Development of master plans for major military installations (sec. 

2811) ....................................................................................................... 739 

Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses 

associated with real property leases and easements (sec. 2812) ....... 739 

Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt 

of utility services as consideration for utility systems conveyances 

(sec. 2813) ............................................................................................... 739 

Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real property 

(sec. 2814) ............................................................................................... 740 

Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pin ̃ on Canyon 

Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado (sec. 2815) .............................. 740 

Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment ......... 740 

Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period 

covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of 

Inspectors General for Guam Realignment (sec. 2821) ...................... 740 

Realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region (sec. 

2822) ....................................................................................................... 740 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances ....................................................................... 741 

Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California 

(sec. 2831) ............................................................................................... 741 

Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, 

California (sec. 2832) ............................................................................. 742 

Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii (sec. 

2833) ....................................................................................................... 742 

Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (sec. 2834) ................................................................................ 742 

Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah (sec. 2835) .............................. 742 

Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch 

Mountains, Utah (sec. 2836) ................................................................. 742 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXVII 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS— 

Continued 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances—Continued 

Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania (sec. 2837) ................... 743 

Subtitle E—Other Matters .............................................................................. 743 

Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement (sec. 2841) ..................................................................................... 743 

Establishment of military divers memorial (sec. 2842) .......................... 743 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 743 

Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room patterns and 

floor areas for military family housing and submission of net floor 

area information .................................................................................... 743 

Department of Defense report on Military Housing Privatization Initiative ...................................................................................................... 744 

Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership in Energy 

and Environmental Design (LEED) gold or platinum certification ... 744 

Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia .................. 744 

Naming Provisions .................................................................................... 744 

Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical 

Park, Ohio .............................................................................................. 745 

Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial in Riverside, California ................................................................................... 745 

Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military memorials ............... 745 

TITLE XXIX—WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC LANDS TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY ....... 746 

Short title (sec. 2901) ................................................................................ 746 

Definitions (sec. 2902) ............................................................................... 746 

Subtitle A—General Provisions ....................................................................... 746 

General applicability; definitions (sec. 2911) .......................................... 746 

Maps and legal descriptions (sec. 2912) .................................................. 746 

Access restrictions (sec. 2913) .................................................................. 746 

Changes in use (sec. 2914) ........................................................................ 746 

Brush and range fire prevention and suppression (sec. 2915) .............. 746 

Ongoing decontamination (sec. 2916) ...................................................... 746 

Water rights (sec. 2917) ............................................................................ 747 

Hunting, fishing, and trapping (sec. 2918) .............................................. 747 

Limitation on extensions and renewals (sec. 2919) ................................ 747 

Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2920) ... 747 

Limitation on subsequent availability of land for appropriation (sec. 

2921) ....................................................................................................... 747 

Relinquishment (sec. 2922) ....................................................................... 748 

Immunity of the United States (sec. 2923) ............................................. 748 

Subtitle B—Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana .................................. 748 

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2931) .......................... 748 

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2932) .................... 748 

Special rules governing minerals management (sec. 2933) ................... 748 

Grazing (sec. 2934) .................................................................................... 749 

Payments in lieu of taxes (sec. 2935) ....................................................... 749 

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2936) .............................. 749 

Subtitle C—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, 

California ....................................................................................................... 749 

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2941) .......................... 749 

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2942) .................... 749 

Public access (sec. 2943) ........................................................................... 750 

Resource management group (sec. 2944) ................................................. 750 

Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area (sec. 2945) ....... 750 

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2946) .............................. 750 

Subtitle D—White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, 

Texas .............................................................................................................. 750 

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2951) .......................... 750 

Grazing (sec. 2952) .................................................................................... 750 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California ........... 750 

Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land (sec. 2961) ......... 750 

Management and use of transferred land (sec. 2962) ............................ 751 

Effect of termination of military use (sec. 2963) ..................................... 751 

Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period (sec. 2964) ........... 751 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXVIII 

TITLE XXIX—WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC LANDS TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY— 

Continued 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California—Continued 

Water rights (sec. 2965) ............................................................................ 751 

Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title (sec. 

2966) ....................................................................................................... 752 

Subtitle F—Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California ................. 752 

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2971) .......................... 752 

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2972) .................... 752 

Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the Navy 

(sec. 2973) ............................................................................................... 752 

Geothermal resources (sec. 2974) ............................................................. 752 

Wild horses and burros (sec. 2975) .......................................................... 753 

Continuation of existing agreement (sec. 2976) ...................................... 753 

Management plans (sec. 2977) ................................................................. 753 

Termination of prior withdrawals (sec. 2978) ......................................... 753 

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2979) .............................. 753 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 753 

Water rights ............................................................................................... 753 

Withdrawal ................................................................................................ 753 

Water rights ............................................................................................... 754 

Withdrawal ................................................................................................ 754 

Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study Area, Marine 

Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California ... 754 

Water rights ............................................................................................... 754 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ...................................... 754 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS ................................................................................................................. 754 

Overview .................................................................................................... 754 

Budget Item ...................................................................................................... 756 

Project 99–D–143, mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility ......................... 756 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations .............................. 756 

National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101) .......................... 756 

Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102) ............................................ 757 

Other defense activities (sec. 3103) ......................................................... 757 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations ........... 757 

Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3111) ....................................................................................... 757 

Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3112) ............................................................. 757 

Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk (sec. 

3113) ....................................................................................................... 758 

Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security 

Administration (sec. 3114) .................................................................... 759 

Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator 

for Nuclear Security (sec. 3115) ............................................................ 760 

Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, 

and Testing (sec. 3116) .......................................................................... 760 

Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the 

replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research 

Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico (sec. 3117) 760 

Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options (sec. 3118) .... 761 

Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions to carry out certain research projects (sec. 3119) ................... 761 

Increase in construction design threshold (sec. 3120) ............................ 761 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports ........................................................................ 762 

Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy 

defense facilities (sec. 3121) .................................................................. 762 

Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear weapons stockpile (sec. 3122) ...................................................... 762 

Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan (sec. 3123) 763 

Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management 

and operating contracts (sec. 3124) ...................................................... 763 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXIX 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS—Continued 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports—Continued 

Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to program on 

scientific engagement for nonproliferation (sec. 3125) ....................... 763 

Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium capabilities replacement project (sec. 3126) ................................................ 764 

Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation (sec. 3127) 764 

Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of 

nuclear security enterprise (sec. 3128) ................................................ 764 

Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such computing into the stockpile stewardship program (sec. 3129) ................ 765 

Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles 

(sec. 3130) ............................................................................................... 766 

Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries (sec. 3131) ..... 766 

Repeal of certain reporting requirements (sec. 3132) ............................. 766 

Subtitle D—Other Matters .............................................................................. 767 

Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy (sec. 3141) .......................... 767 

Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on the 

Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise (sec. 3142) ............... 767 

Department of Energy land conveyances (sec. 3143) ............................. 767 

Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (sec. 3144) .......... 768 

Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (sec. 3145) ................................................................................ 768 

Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act (sec. 3146) .... 768 

Sense of Congress on B61–12 life extension program (sec. 3147) ......... 768 

Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic 

substances and worker health (sec. 3148) ........................................... 769 

Legislative Provisions Not Adopted ................................................................ 769 

Energy security and assurance ................................................................ 769 

Termination of Department of Energy Employees to Protect National 

Security ................................................................................................... 769 

Assessment of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration ............................................................... 770 

Government Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Extension ............................... 771 

Manhattan Project National Historic Park ............................................. 772 

TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD ............. 772 

Authorization (sec. 3201) .......................................................................... 772 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 772 

Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board ............. 772 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES ........................................... 774 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 3401) ............................................ 774 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION ................................................. 774 

Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the 

Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014 (sec. 3501) ............................... 774 

5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program (sec. 

3502) ....................................................................................................... 774 

Sense of Congress (sec. 3503) ................................................................... 774 

Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility, 

Port of Anchorage, Alaska (sec. 3504) .................................................. 774 

Strategic seaports (sec. 3505) ................................................................... 775 

Legislative Provision Not Adopted .................................................................. 775 

Maritime Administration .......................................................................... 775 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES ....................................................................... 775 

Authorization of amounts in funding tables (sec. 4001) ......................... 775 

Summary of National Defense Authorizations for Fiscal Year 2014 .... 775 

National Defense Budget Authority Implication .................................... 780 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT .............................................................................. 782 

Procurement (sec. 4101) ............................................................................ 782 

Procurement for Overseas Contingency Operations (sec. 4102) ............ 816 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION ..... 824 

Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (sec. 4201) .................... 824 

Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation for Overseas Contingency Operations (sec. 4202) ................................................................. 859 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ........................................... 861 

Operation and Maintenance (sec. 4301) .................................................. 861 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
Page

XXX 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE—Continued 

Operation and Maintenance for Overseas Contingency Operations 

(sec. 4302) ............................................................................................... 881 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL .............................................................. 892 

Military Personnel (sec. 4401) .................................................................. 892 

Military Personnel for Overseas Contingency Operations (sec. 4402) .. 893 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS .......................................................... 894 

Other Authorizations (sec. 4501) ............................................................. 894 

Other Authorizations for Overseas Contingency Operations (sec. 

4502) ....................................................................................................... 898 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ....................................................... 900 

Military Construction (sec. 4601) ............................................................. 900 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS ................................................................................................................. 917 

Department of Energy National Security Programs (sec. 4701) ........... 917 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR 

FISCAL YEAR 2014 

LEGISLATIVE TEXT 

[Note from the Director, Legislative Operations: The following is 

the enrolled legislative text of H.R. 3304, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2014, as passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate] 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. ORGANIZATION OF ACT INTO DIVISIONS; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 

(a) DIVISIONS.—This Act is organized into four divisions as follows: 

(1) Division A—Department of Defense Authorizations. 

(2) Division B—Military Construction Authorizations. 

(3) Division C—Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other Authorizations. 

(4) Division D—Funding Tables. 

(b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act is as 

follows: 

Sec. 1. Short title. 

Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents. 

Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees. 

Sec. 4. Explanatory statement. 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program. 

Sec. 112. Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for tactical vehicles. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

Sec. 121. CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program. 

Sec. 122. Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface combatants. 

Sec. 123. Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program. 

Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

Sec. 131. Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC–135E aircraft. 

Sec. 132. Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft. 

Sec. 133. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft. 

Sec. 134. Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J aircraft by the Air Force. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
2 

Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 

Sec. 141. Personal protection equipment procurement. 

Sec. 142. Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements. 

Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global Hawk 

unmanned aircraft systems and A–10 aircraft. 

Sec. 144. MC–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft. 

Sec. 145. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers. 

Sec. 146. Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety risks associated with ejection seats. 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 211. Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. 

Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering 

and manufacturing phase. 

Sec. 213. Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program. 

Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation. 

Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of 

the Air Force. 

Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition 

program. 

Sec. 217. Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on availability of 

funds for noncompetitive procedures for offensive anti-surface warfare 

weapon contracts of the Navy. 

Sec. 218. Review of software development for F–35 aircraft. 

Sec. 219. Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground system. 

Sec. 220. Operationally responsive space. 

Sec. 221. Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, surveillance, and 

reconnaissance capabilities. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

Sec. 231. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system. 

Sec. 232. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program. 

Sec. 233. Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of certain missile defense systems; report on regional ballistic missile defense. 

Sec. 234. Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system in the United States. 

Sec. 235. Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the United States 

homeland. 

Sec. 236. Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense sensor architectures. 

Sec. 237. Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system. 

Sec. 238. Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense options. 

Sec. 239. Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile defense matters. 

Sec. 240. Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense burden-sharing. 

Sec. 241. Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile defense capabilities. 

Sec. 242. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II 

exoatmospheric kill vehicle. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program. 

Sec. 252. Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the acquisition 

program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter. 

Sec. 253. Report on strategy to improve body armor. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 261. Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory Board. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
3 

Sec. 262. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions. 

Sec. 263. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology achievements. 

Sec. 264. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems. 

Sec. 265. Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 266. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment 

of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom’s Vanguard successor program. 

Sec. 267. Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile 

project. 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environment 

Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities relating to operational energy strategy. 

Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities. 

Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act. 

Sec. 314. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn pits. 

Sec. 315. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

Sec. 321. Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment. 

Sec. 322. Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report. 

Sec. 323. Consideration of Army arsenals’ capabilities to fulfill manufacturing requirements. 

Sec. 324. Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of operating forces used to support overseas contingency operations. 

Sec. 325. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan. 

Sec. 326. Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit readiness. 

Sec. 332. Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for equipment readiness and strategic capability. 

Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding 

information technology capital assets. 

Sec. 334. Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention reporting requirements. 

Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority 

Sec. 341. Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores. 

Sec. 342. Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration 

teams outside the United States. 

Sec. 343. Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations Command 

National Capital Region. 

Sec. 344. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 351. Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units. 

Sec. 352. Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms. 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. 

Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels and in 

annual limitation on certain end strength reductions. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
4 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. 

Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. 

Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). 

Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. 

Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for 

operational support. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 421. Military personnel. 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 

Sec. 501. Congressional notification requirements related to increases in number of 

general and flag officers on active duty or in joint duty assignments. 

Sec. 502. Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education upon original appointment as a commissioned officer. 

Sec. 503. Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and selective early 

removal of officers from reserve active-status list. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

Sec. 511. Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve components. 

Sec. 512. Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active and 

inactive National Guard. 

Sec. 513. Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve component 

units and involuntary mobilizations of certain Reserves. 

Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component general 

and flag officers in an active status. 

Sec. 515. Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

Sec. 521. Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program about disability-related employment and education protections. 

Sec. 522. Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury before administrative separation. 

Sec. 523. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators. 

Sec. 524. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation Plan. 

Sec. 525. Provision of military service records to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

in an electronic format. 

Sec. 526. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System. 

Subtitle D—Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault Prevention and 

Response and Related Reforms 

Sec. 531. Modification of eligibility for appointment as Judge on the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 532. Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed 

Forces and chaplains of such members. 

Sec. 533. Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance with regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed 

Forces and their chaplains. 

Sec. 534. Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense policy regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious services. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training 

Sec. 541. Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for purposes of certain educational assistance under laws administered by the 

Secretary of Defense. 

Sec. 542. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military 

occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian 

certifications and licenses. 

Sec. 543. Report on the Troops to Teachers program. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
5 

Sec. 544. Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation 

of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct student loans of 

certain members of the Armed Forces. 

Subtitle F—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters 

Sec. 551. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit 

dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees. 

Sec. 552. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. 

Sec. 553. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and secondary education component of Department of Defense education program. 

Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of members of 

the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces. 

Sec. 555. Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the Armed Forces in 

child custody determinations. 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards 

Sec. 561. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be awarded 

to the same member of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 562. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of 

Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and 

Distinguished-Service Medal. 

Sec. 563. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard 

Medal of Honor Roll requirements. 

Sec. 564. Prompt replacement of military decorations. 

Sec. 565. Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, 

Texas. 

Sec. 566. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former members of the 

Armed Forces previously recommended for award of the Medal of 

Honor. 

Sec. 567. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of valor during 

the Vietnam War. 

Sec. 568. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross for acts of 

valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars. 

Sec. 569. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant Alonzo 

H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War. 

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Sec. 571. Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation reports to include 360-degree assessment approach. 

Sec. 572. Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members of 

the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B. 

Sec. 573. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary 

schools. 

Sec. 574. Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality disorder 

or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members from the Armed 

Forces. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 581. Accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees listed as missing and related reports. 

Sec. 582. Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing reports of 

certain recovered persons who were never placed in a missing status. 

Sec. 583. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation of 

North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville State College. 

Sec. 584. Review of security of military installations, including barracks, temporary 

lodging facilities, and multi-family residences. 

Sec. 585. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military 

Cemeteries. 

Sec. 586. Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members of the 

Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans. 

Sec. 587. Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
6 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances. 

Sec. 602. Recognition of additional means by which members of the National Guard 

called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less may initially 

report for duty for entitlement to basic pay. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve 

forces. 

Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health 

care professionals. 

Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. 

Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special 

pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. 

Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. 

Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of 

precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency. 

Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in 

the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. 

Sec. 618. Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned officers in the 

reserve components. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances 

Sec. 621. Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense travel 

and transportation authorities in connection with reform of such authorities. 

Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits 

Sec. 631. Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case of members 

whose retired pay is computed using high-three. 

Sec. 632. Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early retirement credit 

earned for significant periods of active Federal status or active duty. 

Sec. 633. Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other dependents. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 

Operations 

Sec. 641. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals. 

Sec. 642. Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service laws. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 651. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human 

remains that were retained by the Department of Defense for forensic pathology investigation. 

Sec. 652. Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional compensation 

and other transitional benefits to dependents of members separated for 

violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 

Sec. 701. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled in 

TRICARE Prime. 

Sec. 702. Mental health care treatment through telemedicine. 

Sec. 703. Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of members 

of the Armed Forces with urotrauma. 

Sec. 704. Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the Armed 

Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
7 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

Sec. 711. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to enter into 

contracts and agreements and make grants to other nonprofit entities. 

Sec. 712. Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities. 

Sec. 713. Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of the 

reserve components. 

Sec. 722. Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain Centers of Excellence. 

Sec. 723. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries. 

Sec. 724. Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to members of 

the Armed Forces and veterans. 

Sec. 725. Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program and 

availability of compounded pharmaceuticals. 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND 

RELATED MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

Sec. 801. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense laboratories. 

Sec. 802. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract 

services. 

Sec. 803. Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations 

Sec. 811. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation. 

Sec. 812. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports. 

Sec. 813. Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension or debarment. 

Sec. 814. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs 

Sec. 821. Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense acquisition 

programs. 

Sec. 822. Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone B approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a space program. 

Sec. 823. Additional responsibility for product support managers for major weapon 

systems. 

Sec. 824. Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes for the acquisition of weapon systems. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations 

in Iraq or Afghanistan 

Sec. 831. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy. 

Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan. 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

Sec. 901. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise 

architecture. 

Sec. 902. Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government 

tenants onto military installations in the United States. 

Sec. 903. Clarification of authority for the command acquisition executive of the 

United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 904. Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
8 

Sec. 905. Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and education. 

Sec. 906. Modification of reference to major Department of Defense headquarters activities instruction. 

Sec. 907. Personnel security. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy. 

Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection. 

Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy. 

Sec. 914. Space control mission report. 

Sec. 915. Responsive launch. 

Sec. 916. Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program. 

Sec. 917. Eagle Vision system. 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities 

Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. 

Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities. 

Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service. 

Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation. 

Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters 

Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense tactical 

data link systems. 

Sec. 932. Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States Cyber Command. 

Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense. 

Sec. 934. Modification of requirement for Report on Department of Defense Progress 

in Defending the Department and the Defense Industrial Base from 

Cyber Events. 

Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 936. Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses. 

Sec. 937. Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the Department 

of Defense. 

Sec. 938. Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities. 

Sec. 939. Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems and tactical communications systems. 

Sec. 940. Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons. 

Sec. 941. Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace. 

Sec. 942. National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education matters. 

Subtitle E—Total Force Management 

Sec. 951. Reviews of appropriate manpower performance. 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. 

Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act. 

Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements. 

Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. 

Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. 

Sec. 1013. Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for 

counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

Sec. 1021. Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the construction of naval vessels. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
9 

Sec. 1022. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no cost 

to the Navy. 

Sec. 1023. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class 

cruisers or dock landing ships. 

Sec. 1024. Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions. 

Sec. 1025. Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships. 

Sec. 1026. Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment. 

Sec. 1027. Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of the strike 

forces of the Navy. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

Sec. 1031. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military commissions. 

Sec. 1032. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program reporting requirement. 

Sec. 1033. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United 

States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals 

detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1035. Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1036. Report on information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1037. Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo. 

Sec. 1038. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, and 

prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to 

Yemen. 

Sec. 1039. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo 

if transferred to the United States. 

Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations 

Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations. 

Sec. 1042. Counterterrorism operational briefings. 

Sec. 1043. Report on process for determining targets of lethal or capture operations. 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces 

Sec. 1051. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe. 

Sec. 1052. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and 

Communications System. 

Sec. 1053. Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of Nuclear 

Weapons Council. 

Sec. 1054. Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons stockpile, 

nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system. 

Sec. 1055. Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad. 

Sec. 1056. Implementation of New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1057. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles. 

Sec. 1058. Report on New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1059. Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report. 

Sec. 1060. Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms reductions with the 

Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1061. Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control treaty obligations. 

Sec. 1062. Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the nuclear forces 

of the United States. 

Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

Sec. 1071. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze 

captured records. 

Sec. 1072. Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic spectrum. 

Sec. 1073. Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
10 

Sec. 1074. Notification of modifications to Army force structure. 

Sec. 1075. Aircraft joint training. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

Sec. 1081. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress. 

Sec. 1082. Oversight of combat support agencies. 

Sec. 1083. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology. 

Sec. 1084. Repeal and modification of reporting requirements. 

Sec. 1085. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department 

of Defense efficiencies. 

Sec. 1086. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces and 

United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 1087. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems. 

Sec. 1088. Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1089. Civil Air Patrol. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 1091. Technical and clerical amendments. 

Sec. 1092. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated information system programs. 

Sec. 1093. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance. 

Sec. 1094. Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and authority to waive 

reimbursement of costs of activities for certain nongovernmental personnel. 

Sec. 1095. Amendments to certain national commissions. 

Sec. 1096. Strategy for future military information operations capabilities. 

Sec. 1097. Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security. 

Sec. 1098. Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire suppression and 

other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force. 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS 

Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 

pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 

working overseas. 

Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone. 

Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees 

of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees. 

Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense 

Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program and assessment of STEM and other programs. 

Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel. 

Sec. 1107. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities. 

Sec. 1108. Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian personnel. 

Sec. 1109. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members 

of the Armed Forces. 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the 

capacity of foreign military forces. 

Sec. 1202. Global Security Contingency Fund. 

Sec. 1203. Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces 

with military and other security forces of friendly foreign countries. 

Sec. 1204. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. 

Sec. 1205. Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program. 

Sec. 1206. United States security and assistance strategies in Africa. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
11 

Sec. 1207. Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations. 

Sec. 1208. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord’s 

Resistance Army. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq 

Sec. 1211. Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in 

Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for 

support provided to United States military operations. 

Sec. 1214. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. 

Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop 

and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1216. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1217. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces supporting 

or participating with the United States Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1218. Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program. 

Sec. 1219. Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program. 

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014 

Sec. 1221. Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities and 

finances. 

Sec. 1222. Completion of accelerated transition of security responsibility from 

United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security Forces. 

Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan. 

Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan. 

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran 

Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation 

Council countries. 

Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran. 

Sec. 1233. Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in 

Southwest Asia. 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 1241. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. 

Sec. 1242. Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on military 

and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. 

Sec. 1243. Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond to an 

attack or other contingency against United States diplomatic facilities 

overseas. 

Sec. 1244. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers. 

Sec. 1245. Additional reports on military and security developments involving the 

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. 

Sec. 1246. Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the Russian Federation and limitations on providing certain missile defense information 

to the Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament 

Act. 

Sec. 1248. Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile proliferation. 

Sec. 1249. Reports on international agreements relating to the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1250. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations 

and related NATO agreements. 

Sec. 1251. Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to ballistic 

missile defense. 

Sec. 1252. Rule of construction. 

Sec. 1253. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty. 

Sec. 1254. Report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
12 

Sec. 1255. Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with 

Rosoboronexport. 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds. 

Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. 

Sec. 1303. Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the cooperative 

threat reduction program. 

Sec. 1304. Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the 

Middle East and North Africa region. 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund. 

Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. 

Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program. 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic and 

critical materials supply. 

Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense Stockpile. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 

Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses. 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

Sec. 1501. Purpose. 

Sec. 1502. Procurement. 

Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 1505. Military personnel. 

Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 

Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters 

Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. 

Sec. 1532. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 

Sec. 1533. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization. 

Sec. 1534. Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. 

TITLE XVI—INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1602. Foreign space activities. 

Sec. 1603. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
13 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns 

Sec. 1611. Advancing small business growth. 

Sec. 1612. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative 

Agreement Program. 

Sec. 1613. Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business 

concerns. Sec. 1614. Credit for certain small business subcontractors. 

Sec. 1615. Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts. 

TITLE XVII—SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND 

RELATED REFORMS 

Subtitle A—Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice 

Sec. 1701. Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 1702. Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 1703. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial 

for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes. 

Sec. 1704. Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense in 

presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

Sec. 1705. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of such 

offenses by general courts-martial. 

Sec. 1706. Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial process. 

Sec. 1707. Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice. 

Sec. 1708. Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor relating to 

character and military service of the accused in rule on initial disposition of offenses. 

Sec. 1709. Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed Forces for reporting a criminal offense. 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code 

Sec. 1711. Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who have been 

convicted of certain sexual offenses. 

Sec. 1712. Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of request for permanent change of station or unit transfer by victim of sexual assault. 

Sec. 1713. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of the 

Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense. 

Sec. 1714. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions. 

Sec. 1715. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding 

sexual assault. 

Sec. 1716. Designation and availability of Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of 

sex-related offenses. 

Subtitle C—Amendments to Other Laws 

Sec. 1721. Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing and responding to 

sexual assaults. 

Sec. 1722. Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent panel on assessment of military response systems to sexual assault. 

Sec. 1723. Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of the Armed 

Forces. 

Sec. 1724. Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by members of 

the National Guard and Reserves. 

Sec. 1725. Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response personnel and required availability of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners. 

Sec. 1726. Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 

Office for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response 

program. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
14 

Subtitle D—Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Sec. 1731. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases. 

Sec. 1732. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative practices in response to allegations of Uniform Code of Military Justice violations. 

Sec. 1733. Review of training and education provided members of the Armed Forces 

on sexual assault prevention and response. 

Sec. 1734. Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1735. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity 

role in sexual harassment cases. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 1741. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of the 

Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training. 

Sec. 1742. Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses involving members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1743. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the Armed 

Forces. 

Sec. 1744. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses for 

trial by court-martial. 

Sec. 1745. Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related offenses in 

personnel service records of members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1746. Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies. 

Sec. 1747. Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces are completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security 

Positions. 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions 

Sec. 1751. Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for command climate free of retaliation. 

Sec. 1752. Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice through 

courts-martial. 

Sec. 1753. Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of members 

of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related offenses. 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 2001. Short title. 

Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law. 

TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2102. Family housing. 

Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 

Sec. 2104. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military 

Academy, New York. 

Sec. 2105. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. 

Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 

Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects. 

Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2202. Family housing. 

Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 

Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. 

Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
15 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2302. Family housing. 

Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 

Sec. 2305. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 

project. 

Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. 

Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 

Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 

defense-wide. 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY 

INVESTMENT PROGRAM 

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 

land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. 

Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure 

(BRAC) round. 

Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability 

of military health care in National Capital Region. 

Sec. 2713. Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative. 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 

Sec. 2801. Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified minor military construction authority for laboratory revitalization projects. 

Sec. 2802. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with private developers of housing. 

Sec. 2803. Military construction standards to improve force protection. 

Sec. 2804. Application of cash payments received for utilities and services. 

Sec. 2805. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing investment authority. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
16 

Sec. 2806. Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization 

projects. 

Sec. 2807. Policies and requirements regarding overseas military construction and 

closure and realignment of United States military installations in foreign countries. 

Sec. 2808. Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas 

outside the United States. 

Sec. 2809. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

Sec. 2811. Development of master plans for major military installations. 

Sec. 2812. Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses associated with real property leases and easements. 

Sec. 2813. Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt of 

utility services as consideration for utility systems conveyances. 

Sec. 2814. Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real property. 

Sec. 2815. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pin ̃ on Canyon Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment 

Sec. 2821. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period 

covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment. 

Sec. 2822. Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region. 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances 

Sec. 2831. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California. 

Sec. 2832. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, California. 

Sec. 2833. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. 

Sec. 2834. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 

Sec. 2835. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah. 

Sec. 2836. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch 

Mountains, Utah. 

Sec. 2837. Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 2841. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement. 

Sec. 2842. Establishment of military divers memorial. 

TITLE XXIX—WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC 

LANDS TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY 

Sec. 2901. Short title. 

Sec. 2902. Definitions. 

Subtitle A—General Provisions 

Sec. 2911. General applicability; definitions. 

Sec. 2912. Maps and legal descriptions. 

Sec. 2913. Access restrictions. 

Sec. 2914. Changes in use. 

Sec. 2915. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression. 

Sec. 2916. Ongoing decontamination. 

Sec. 2917. Water rights. 

Sec. 2918. Hunting, fishing, and trapping. 

Sec. 2919. Limitation on extensions and renewals. 

Sec. 2920. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation. 

Sec. 2921. Limitation on subsequent availability of land for appropriation. 

Sec. 2922. Relinquishment. 

Sec. 2923. Immunity of the United States. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
17 

Subtitle B—Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana 

Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2932. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2933. Special rules governing minerals management. 

Sec. 2934. Grazing. 

Sec. 2935. Payments in lieu of taxes. 

Sec. 2936. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

Subtitle C—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California 

Sec. 2941. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2942. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2943. Public access. 

Sec. 2944. Resource management group. 

Sec. 2945. Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. 

Sec. 2946. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

Subtitle D—White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas 

Sec. 2951. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2952. Grazing. 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California 

Sec. 2961. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land. 

Sec. 2962. Management and use of transferred land. 

Sec. 2963. Effect of termination of military use. 

Sec. 2964. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period. 

Sec. 2965. Water rights. 

Sec. 2966. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title. 

Subtitle F—Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California 

Sec. 2971. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2972. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2973. Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the Navy. 

Sec. 2974. Geothermal resources. 

Sec. 2975. Wild horses and burros. 

Sec. 2976. Continuation of existing agreement. 

Sec. 2977. Management plans. 

Sec. 2978. Termination of prior withdrawals. 

Sec. 2979. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY 

AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 

Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3112. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security 

Administration. 

Sec. 3113. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk. 

Sec. 3114. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3115. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security. 

Sec. 3116. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, and 

Testing. 

Sec. 3117. Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building, 

Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. 

Sec. 3118. Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options. 

Sec. 3119. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions 

to carry out certain research projects. 

Sec. 3120. Increase in construction design threshold. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
18 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 

Sec. 3121. Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy defense facilities. 

Sec. 3122. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear 

weapons stockpile. 

Sec. 3123. Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons stockpile 

stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan. 

Sec. 3124. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and 

operating contracts. 

Sec. 3125. Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation. 

Sec. 3126. Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium capabilities replacement project. 

Sec. 3127. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation. 

Sec. 3128. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear security enterprise. 

Sec. 3129. Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such computing into the stockpile stewardship program. 

Sec. 3130. Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles. 

Sec. 3131. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries. 

Sec. 3132. Repeal of certain reporting requirements. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

Sec. 3141. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy. 

Sec. 3142. Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise. 

Sec. 3143. Department of Energy land conveyance. 

Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

Sec. 3145. Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration 

Act. 

Sec. 3146. Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act. 

Sec. 3147. Sense of Congress on B61–12 life extension program. 

Sec. 3148. Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic substances and worker health. 

TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD 

Sec. 3201. Authorization. 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES 

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION 

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014. 

Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program. 

Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress. 

Sec. 3504. Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility, Port 

of Anchorage, Alaska. 

Sec. 3505. Strategic seaports. 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

Sec. 4101. Procurement. 

Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
19 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

Sec. 4401. Military personnel. 

Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. 

Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 4601. Military construction. 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Sec. 4701. Department of energy national security programs. 

SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES. 

For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘congressional defense committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 

10, United States Code. 

SEC. 4. EXPLANATORY STATEMENT. 

The explanatory statement regarding this Act, printed in the 

House section of the Congressional Record on or about December 11, 

2013, by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the 

House of Representatives, shall have the same effect with respect to 

the implementation of this Act as if it were a joint explanatory statement of a committee of conference. 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

Sec. 111. Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program. 

Sec. 112. Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for tactical vehicles. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

Sec. 121. CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program. 

Sec. 122. Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface combatants. 

Sec. 123. Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program. 

Sec. 124. Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

Sec. 131. Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC–135E aircraft. 

Sec. 132. Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft. 

Sec. 133. Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft. 

Sec. 134. Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J aircraft by the Air Force. 

Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 

Sec. 141. Personal protection equipment procurement. 

Sec. 142. Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements. 

Sec. 143. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global Hawk 

unmanned aircraft systems and A–10 aircraft. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
20 

Sec. 144. MC–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft. 

Sec. 145. Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers. 

Sec. 146. Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety risks associated with ejection seats. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 101. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, 

the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

SEC. 111. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR STRYKER VEHICLE PROGRAM. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for weapons and tracked combat vehicles, Army, for the procurement or upgrade of Stryker vehicles, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following 

the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits the report 

under subsection (b). 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the 

Stryker vehicle spare parts inventory located in Auburn, Washington, cited in the report of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (number 2013–025) dated November 30, 2012. The 

report submitted under this subsection shall include the following: 

(1) The status of the implementation by the Secretary of the 

recommendations specified on pages 30 to 34 of the report by 

the Inspector General. 

(2) The value of the parts remaining in warehouse that may 

still be used by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, or reset 

of Stryker vehicles. 

(3) The value of the parts remaining in the warehouse that 

are no longer usable by the Secretary for the repair, upgrade, 

or reset of Stryker vehicles. 

(4) A cost estimate of the monthly cost of maintaining the inventory of such parts that are no longer usable by the Secretary. 

(5) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. 

SEC. 112. STUDY ON MULTIYEAR, MULTIVEHICLE PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR TACTICAL VEHICLES. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) budget uncertainty and reduced defense procurements 

have had negative impacts on the tactical vehicle industrial 

base; and 

(2) in such environment, the Army should consider innovative 

contracting and acquisition strategies to maximize cost savings, 

improve the sustainment of the tactical vehicle industrial base, 

and reduce risk during this downturn in defense procurement. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
21 

(b) STUDY REQUIRED.— 

(1) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Army, in consultation with 

the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and 

Logistics, shall conduct a study of the desirability and feasibility of requesting legislative authority, in accordance with section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, to enter into one or 

more multiyear, multivehicle contracts for the procurement of 

tactical vehicles beginning in fiscal year 2015 or thereafter. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report on the possible multiyear, multivehicle contracting options and other innovative contracting options considered in the 

study under paragraph (1). Such report should include the following: 

(A) A business case analysis of a multiyear, multivehicle 

contract for tactical vehicles, including any potential increases in cost, savings, or risk that may derive from such 

a contract in comparison to standard contracting methods. 

(B) An evaluation of whether the Secretary requires legislative action to enter into such a multiyear, multivehicle 

contract. 

(C) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

SEC. 121. CVN–78 CLASS AIRCRAFT CARRIER PROGRAM. 

(a) COST LIMITATION BASELINE FOR LEAD SHIP.—Subsection (a) 

of section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2104) is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) LIMITATION.— 

‘‘(1) LEAD SHIP.—The total amount obligated from funds appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and 

Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement account, for the 

aircraft carrier designated as CVN–78 may not exceed 

$12,887,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to subsection (b)). 

‘‘(2) FOLLOW-ON SHIPS.—The total amount obligated from 

funds appropriated or otherwise made available for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, or for any other procurement 

account, for the construction of any ship that is constructed in 

the CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers after the lead ship of that 

class may not exceed $11,498,000,000 (as adjusted pursuant to 

subsection (b)).’’. 

(b) HULL NUMBER; ADDITIONAL FACTOR FOR ADJUSTMENT OF

LIMITATION AMOUNT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended— 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 

‘‘CVN–21’’ and inserting ‘‘CVN–78’’; 

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2006’’ and inserting 

‘‘2013’’; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
22 

(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(7) With respect to the aircraft carrier designated as CVN– 

78, the amounts of increases or decreases in costs of that ship 

that are attributable solely to an urgent and unforeseen requirement identified as a result of the shipboard test program.’’. 

(2) LIMITATION ON ADJUSTMENT.—Such section is further 

amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) LIMITATION ON SHIPBOARD TEST PROGRAM COST ADJUSTMENT.—With respect to using the authority under subsection (b)(7) 

to adjust the amount set forth in subsection (a)(1) for the aircraft 

carrier designated as CVN–78 for reasons relating to an urgent and 

unforeseen requirement identified as a result of the shipboard test 

program, the Secretary may only use such authority if— 

‘‘(1) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that such requirement was not 

known before the date of the submittal to Congress of the budget for fiscal year 2014 (as submitted pursuant to section 1105 

of title 31, United States Code); 

‘‘(2) the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees, that waiting on an action by Congress to raise the cost cap specified in such subsection (a)(1) to 

account for such requirement will result in a delay in the delivery of that ship or a delay in the date of initial operating capability of that ship; and 

‘‘(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a description of such requirement 

before the obligation of additional funds pursuant to such authority.’’. 

(c) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN–79.—Such section is further amended by adding after subsection (e), as added by subsection (b)(2), the 

following new subsection: 

‘‘(f) REQUIREMENTS FOR CVN–79.— 

‘‘(1) QUARTERLY COST ESTIMATE.—The Secretary of the Navy 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees on a quarterly basis a report setting forth the most current cost estimate 

for the aircraft carrier designated as CVN–79 (as estimated by 

the program manager). Each cost estimate shall include the 

current percentage of completion of the program, the total costs 

incurred, and an estimate of costs at completion for ship construction, Government-furnished equipment, and engineering 

and support costs. 

‘‘(2) DIRECTION FOR NEGOTIATING CERTAIN CONTRACTS.—The 

Secretary shall ensure that each prime contract for the aircraft 

carrier designated as CVN–79 includes an incentive fee structure that will, throughout the period of performance of the contract, provide incentives for each contractor to meet the portion 

of the cost of the ship, as limited by subsection (a)(2) and adjusted pursuant to subsection (b), for which the contractor is responsible.’’. 

(d) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
23 

‘‘SEC. 122. ADHERENCE TO NAVY COST ESTIMATES FOR CVN–78 CLASS 

OF AIRCRAFT CARRIERS.’’. 

(e) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents at the beginning 

of such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 122 

and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 122. Adherence to Navy cost estimates for CVN–78 class of aircraft carriers.’’. 

SEC. 122. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PROCUREMENT 

OF FUTURE SURFACE COMBATANTS. 

Section 125 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2214; 10 U.S.C. 7291 

note) is repealed. 

SEC. 123. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR E–2D AIRCRAFT 

PROGRAM. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy 

may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the 

fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of E–2D aircraft. 

(b) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAYMENTS.—A contract 

entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation 

of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 

SEC. 124. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LITTORAL 

COMBAT SHIP. 

(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for construction or advanced procurement of materials for the Littoral 

Combat Ships designated as LCS 25 or LCS 26 may be obligated 

or expended until the Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following: 

(1) The report required by subsection (b)(1). 

(2) A coordinated determination by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics that successful 

completion of the test evaluation master plan for both seaframes 

and each mission module will demonstrate operational effectiveness and operational suitability. 

(3) A certification that the Joint Requirements Oversight 

Council— 

(A) has reviewed the capabilities of the legacy systems 

that the Littoral Combat Ship is planned to replace and 

has compared such capabilities to the capabilities to be provided by the Littoral Combat Ship; 

(B) has assessed the adequacy of the current capabilities 

development document for the Littoral Combat Ship to 

meet the requirements of the combatant commands and to 

address future threats as reflected in the latest assessment 

by the defense intelligence community; and 

(C) has either validated the current capabilities development document or directed the Secretary to update the current capabilities development document based on the performance of the Littoral Combat Ship and mission modules 

to date. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
24 

(4) A report on the expected performance of each seaframe 

variant and mission module against the current or updated capabilities development document. 

(5) Certification that a capability production document will 

be completed for each mission module before operational testing. 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Chief of Naval Operations, in coordination with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the current concept of operations and expected survivability attributes of each of the Littoral Combat Ship seaframes. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

set forth the following: 

(A) A review of the current concept of operations of the 

Littoral Combat Ship and a comparison of such concept of 

operations with the original concept of operations of the Littoral Combat Ship. 

(B) An assessment of the ability of the Littoral Combat 

Ship to carry out the core missions of the Cooperative 

Strategy for 21st Century Seapower of the Navy. 

(C) A comparison of the combat capabilities for the three 

missions assigned to the Littoral Combat Ship seaframes 

(anti-surface warfare, mine countermeasures, and anti-submarine warfare) with the combat capabilities for each of 

such missions of the systems the Littoral Combat Ship is 

replacing. 

(D) An assessment of expected survivability of the Littoral 

Combat Ship seaframes in the context of the planned employment of the Littoral Combat Ship as described in the 

concept of operations. 

(E) The current status of operational testing for the 

seaframes and the mission modules of the Littoral Combat 

Ship. 

(F) An updated test and evaluation master plan for the 

Littoral Combat Ship. 

(G) A review of survivability testing, modeling, and simulation conducted to date on the two seaframes of the Littoral Combat Ship. 

(H) An updated assessment of the endurance of the Littoral Combat Ship at sea with respect to maintenance, fuel 

use, and sustainment of crew and mission modules. 

(I) An assessment of the adequacy of current ship manning plans for the Littoral Combat Ship and an assessment 

of the impact that increased manning has on design 

changes and the endurance of the Littoral Combat Ship. 

(J) A list of the casualty reports to date on each Littoral 

Combat Ship, including a description of the impact of such 

casualties on the design or ability of that Littoral Combat 

Ship to perform assigned missions. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in classified form and unclassified form. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
25 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

SEC. 131. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN 

RETIRED KC–135E AIRCRAFT. 

Section 135 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2114), as 

amended by section 131 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 

4377), is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘(a) LIMITATION.—’’; and 

(2) by striking subsection (b). 

SEC. 132. MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY FOR C–130J AIRCRAFT. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR MULTIYEAR PROCUREMENT.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air 

Force may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning 

with the fiscal year 2014 program year, for the procurement of C– 

130J aircraft for the Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Navy. 

(b) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAYMENTS.—A contract 

entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation 

of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year. 

SEC. 133. PROHIBITION ON CANCELLATION OR MODIFICATION OF AVIONICS MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FOR C–130 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 

for the Air Force may be used to— 

(1) take any action to cancel or modify the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft; or 

(2) initiate an alternative communication, navigation, surveillance, and air traffic management program for C–130 aircraft 

that is designed or intended to replace the avionics modernization program described in paragraph (1). 

(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than April 1, 

2014, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a sufficiency review of the costbenefit analysis conducted under section 143(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 

126 Stat. 1662), including any findings and recommendations relating to such review. 

SEC. 134. PROHIBITION OF PROCUREMENT OF UNNECESSARY C–27J 

AIRCRAFT BY THE AIR FORCE. 

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) 

for aircraft procurement, Air Force, that remain available to the 

Secretary of the Air Force on or after the date of the enactment of 

this Act may be obligated or expended for the procurement of additional C-27J aircraft that are not on contract as of June 1, 2013. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
26 

Subtitle E—Defense-wide, Joint, and 

Multiservice Matters 

SEC. 141. PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT. 

(a) CONSOLIDATED BUDGET JUSTIFICATION DISPLAY.—Chapter 9 

of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding after section 

235 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 236. Personal protection equipment procurement: display 

of budget information 

‘‘(a) BUDGET JUSTIFICATION DISPLAY.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to Congress, as a part of the defense budget materials 

for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2014, a consolidated budget justification display that covers all programs and activities associated 

with the procurement of personal protection equipment during the 

period covered by the future-years defense program submitted in 

that fiscal year under section 221. 

‘‘(b) REQUIREMENTS FOR BUDGET DISPLAY.—The consolidated 

budget justification display under subsection (a) for a fiscal year 

shall include the following: 

‘‘(1) The amount for personal protection equipment included 

in both the base budget of the President and any overseas contingency operations budget of the President. 

‘‘(2) A brief description of each category of personal protection 

equipment for each military department planned to be procured 

and developed. 

‘‘(3) For each category planned to be procured using funds 

made available for operation and maintenance (whether under 

the base budget or any overseas contingency operations budget)— 

‘‘(A) the relevant appropriations account, budget activity, 

and subactivity group for the category; and 

‘‘(B) the funding profile for the fiscal year as requested, 

including cost and quantities, and an estimate of projected 

investments or procurements for each of the subsequent five 

fiscal years. 

‘‘(4) For each category planned to be developed using funds 

made available for research, development, test, and evaluation 

(whether under the base budget or any overseas contingency operations budget)— 

‘‘(A) the relevant appropriations account, program, 

project or activity; program element number, and line number; and 

‘‘(B) the funding profile for the fiscal year as requested 

and an estimate of projected investments for each of the 

subsequent five fiscal years. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The terms ‘budget’ and ‘defense budget materials’ have 

the meaning given those terms in section 234 of this title. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘category of personal protection equipment’ 

means the following: 

‘‘(A) Body armor components. 

‘‘(B) Combat helmets. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
27 

‘‘(C) Combat protective eyewear. 

‘‘(D) Other items as determined appropriate by the Secretary.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 235 the following new item: 

‘‘236. Personal protection equipment procurement: display of budget information.’’. 

SEC. 142. REPEAL OF CERTAIN F–35 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4157) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (b); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b). 

SEC. 143. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT 

OF RQ–4 GLOBAL HAWK UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS 

AND A–10 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) LIMITATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to manning levels with respect to covered aircraft or to retire, prepare to retire, or place 

in storage a covered aircraft. 

(2) COVERED AIRCRAFT.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘covered 

aircraft’’ means the following: 

(A) A–10 aircraft (except for such aircraft that the Secretary of the Air Force, as of April 9, 2013, plans to retire). 

(B) RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems. 

(b) ADDITIONAL LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF CERTAIN A–10 

AIRCRAFT.—In addition to the limitation in subsection (a)(1), during 

the period preceding December 31, 2014, the Secretary of the Air 

Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage A–10 aircraft (except for such aircraft that the Secretary, as of April 9, 2013, 

plans to retire). 

(c) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on all 

high-altitude airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems operated, or planned for future operation, by the 

Department of Defense. 

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) 

shall include— 

(A) the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities of each high-altitude intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance system covered by the report; 

(B) the plans to upgrade such capabilities in the future; 

(C) the fully-burdened cost-per-flight-hour of each such 

system; 

(D) the number of requests for each such system made by 

commanders of the combatant commands during the fiveVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
28 

year period prior to the report, including the percentage of 

such requests that have been fulfilled to meet the requirements of such commanders; 

(E) a description of the assumptions used by the Secretary in carrying out this subsection; and 

(F) any other information that the Secretary considers 

appropriate with respect to the analysis of high-altitude intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance systems. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

(4) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to 

limit or otherwise affect the requirement to maintain the operational 

capability of RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk unmanned aircraft systems under section 154(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1666). 

SEC. 144. MC–12 LIBERTY INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Beginning on the date that is 60 days after the 

date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report under 

subsection (d)(1), the Secretary may transfer MC–12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft from the Air Force 

to the Army in accordance with the plan developed under subsection 

(b)(1). 

(b) PLAN.— 

(1) PLAN REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop 

a plan for the potential transfer of MC–12 Liberty intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft from the Air Force to 

the Army pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall— 

(A) ensure that any transfer described in such paragraph 

does not adversely affect ongoing intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance operations, including such operations 

in Afghanistan; 

(B) identify the appropriate size, composition, and configuration of the fleet of MC–12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft required by the Army; 

(C) identify the appropriate size, composition, configuration, and disposition of the remaining fleet of MC–12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft 

required by the Air Force; 

(D) provide for the modification of the MC–12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft that 

are transferred to the Army pursuant to the plan in order 

to meet the long-term needs of the Army; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
29 

(E) for any aircraft that are so transferred, include a 

time line for the orderly transfer of the aircraft in a manner 

consistent with subparagraph (A). 

(c) EFFECT ON OTHER PROGRAMS.— (1) PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PROCURE- MENT.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Army may be obligated or expended to procure additional aircraft under the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and 

Surveillance System program during fiscal year 2014. 

(2) CONVERSION OF AIRCRAFT.—The Secretary of the Army 

shall convert aircraft described in paragraph (3) to the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System program configuration to meet the requirements of the 

Army. The Secretary shall carry out this paragraph using funds 

authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 

available for fiscal year 2013 or 2014 for the Enhanced Medium 

Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance System program. 

(3) AIRCRAFT DESCRIBED.—The aircraft described in this 

paragraph are the following: 

(A) MC–12 Liberty intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft of the Air Force that are transferred to 

the Army pursuant to subsection (a). 

(B) Army Medium Altitude Multi-Intelligence intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance C–12 Quick Reaction Capability aircraft. 

(d) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the date on which the budget 

of the President for fiscal year 2015 is submitted to Congress 

pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the 

Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the plan required by subsection (b)(1). 

(2) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

(3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 145. COMPETITION FOR EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROVIDERS. 

(a) PLAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop 

a plan to implement the new acquisition strategy for the evolved 

expendable launch vehicle program described in the acquisition 

decision memorandum dated November 27, 2012. 

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The plan to implement the new acquisition strategy for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program under paragraph (1) shall include a general description 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
30 

of how the Secretary will conduct competition with respect to 

awarding a contract to certified evolved expendable launch vehicle providers. Such description may include the following 

with respect to such acquisition strategy: 

(A) The proposed cost, schedule, and performance. 

(B) Mission assurance activities. 

(C) The manner in which the contractor will operate 

under the Federal Acquisition Regulation. 

(D) The effect of other contracts in which the contractor 

is entered into with the Federal Government, including the 

evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability contract, the space station commercial resupply services contracts, and other relevant contracts regarding national security space and strategic programs. 

(E) Any other areas the Secretary determines appropriate. 

(b) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—At the same time that the Secretary issues 

a draft of the request for proposals with respect to a contract 

for the evolved expendable launch vehicle provider, the Secretary shall— 

(A) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 

report that includes the plan under subsection (a)(1); or 

(B) provide to such committees a briefing on such plan. 

(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means the following: 

(A) The congressional defense committees. 

(B) The Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of 

the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. 

(C) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the Senate. 

SEC. 146. REPORTS ON PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT AND 

HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH EJECTION 

SEATS. 

(a) STUDY ON PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into 

a contract with a federally funded research and development 

center to conduct a study to identify and assess cost-effective 

and efficient alternative means for the procurement and research and development of personal protection equipment that 

supports and promotes competition and innovation in the personal protection equipment industrial base. 

(2) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 120 days after the date on 

which the contract is entered into under paragraph (1), the federally funded research and development center conducting the 

study under such paragraph shall submit to the Secretary the 

study, including any findings and recommendations. 

(3) REPORT.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date 

on which the Secretary receives the study under paragraph 

(2), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
31 

committees a report that includes the study under paragraph (1), the matters described in subparagraph (B), and 

any related findings, recommendations, comments, and 

plans of the Secretary. 

(B) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subparagraph (A) shall include the following: 

(i) The findings and recommendations of the federally funded research and development center submitted 

to the Secretary under paragraph (2). 

(ii) An assessment of current and future technologies 

that could markedly improve body armor, including by 

decreasing weight, increasing survivability, and making other relevant improvements. 

(iii) An analysis of the capability of the personal protection equipment industrial base to leverage such technologies to produce the next generation body armor. 

(iv) An assessment of alternative body armor acquisition models, including different types of contracting 

and budgeting practices of the Department of Defense. 

(4) PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT.—In this subsection, 

the term ‘‘personal protection equipment’’ includes— 

(A) body armor components; 

(B) combat helmets; 

(C) combat protective eyewear; 

(D) environmental and fire-resistant clothing; and 

(E) other individual equipment items as determined appropriate by the Secretary. 

(b) REPORT ON HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH

EJECTION SEATS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting 

forth an assessment of the risks to the health and safety of 

members of the Armed Forces of the ejection seats currently in 

operational use by the Air Force. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include 

the following: 

(A) An assessment of whether aircrew members wearing 

advanced helmets, night vision systems, helmet-mounted 

cueing system, or other helmet-mounted devices or attachments are at increased risk of serious injury or death during a high-speed ejection sequence. 

(B) An analysis of how ejection seats currently in operational use provide protection against head, neck, and spinal cord injuries during an ejection sequence. 

(C) An analysis of initiatives to decrease the risk of death 

or serious injury during an ejection sequence. 

(D) The status of any testing or qualifications on upgraded ejection seats that may reduce the risk of death or 

serious injury during an ejection sequence. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
32 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, 

TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 211. Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. 

Sec. 212. Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering 

and manufacturing phase. 

Sec. 213. Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program. 

Sec. 214. Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation. 

Sec. 215. Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of 

the Air Force. 

Sec. 216. Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition 

program. 

Sec. 217. Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on availability of 

funds for noncompetitive procedures for offensive anti-surface warfare 

weapon contracts of the Navy. 

Sec. 218. Review of software development for F–35 aircraft. 

Sec. 219. Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground system. 

Sec. 220. Operationally responsive space. 

Sec. 221. Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, surveillance, and 

reconnaissance capabilities. 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

Sec. 231. Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system. 

Sec. 232. Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program. 

Sec. 233. Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of certain missile defense systems; report on regional ballistic missile defense. 

Sec. 234. Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system in the United States. 

Sec. 235. Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the United States 

homeland. 

Sec. 236. Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense sensor architectures. 

Sec. 237. Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system. 

Sec. 238. Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense options. 

Sec. 239. Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile defense matters. 

Sec. 240. Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense burden-sharing. 

Sec. 241. Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile defense capabilities. 

Sec. 242. Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II 

exoatmospheric kill vehicle. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 251. Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program. 

Sec. 252. Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the acquisition 

program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter. 

Sec. 253. Report on strategy to improve body armor. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 261. Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory Board. 

Sec. 262. Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies for military missions. 

Sec. 263. Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology achievements. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
33 

Sec. 264. Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection features during research and development of certain defense systems. 

Sec. 265. Briefing on biometrics activities of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 266. Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment 

of Ohio-class replacement program with the United Kingdom’s Vanguard successor program. 

Sec. 267. Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile 

project. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, 

Restrictions, and Limitations 

SEC. 211. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS ON BIENNIAL STRATEGIC 

PLAN FOR THE DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH 

PROJECTS AGENCY. 

(a) ELEMENTS OF STRATEGIC PLAN.—Subsection (b) of section 

2352 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows: 

‘‘(1) The strategic objectives of that agency, and the linkage 

between such objectives and the missions of the armed forces.’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking ‘‘goals’’ and inserting ‘‘objectives’’; 

(3) by striking paragraph (3); 

(4) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) 

and (4), respectively; and 

(5) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (4) of this 

subsection, by striking ‘‘for the programs of that agency’’ and inserting ‘‘for programs demonstrating military systems to one or 

more of the armed forces’’. 

(b) RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUBMISSION OF PLAN.—Subsection (c) of 

such section is amended by striking ‘‘Secretary of Defense shall’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Director shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary 

of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics,’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall 

apply with respect to biennial strategic plans submitted under section 2352 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this section, after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 212. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING 

PHASE. 

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Army may be 

obligated or expended for post-Milestone B engineering and manufacturing phase development activities for the ground combat vehicle program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
34 

on which the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: 

(1) An independent assessment of the draft milestone B documentation for the ground combat vehicle that— 

(A) is performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and 

Program Evaluation, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Research and Engineering, or other similar official; and 

(B) analyzes whether there is a sufficient business case to 

proceed with the engineering and manufacturing development phase for the ground combat vehicle using only one 

contractor. 

(2) A certification by the Secretary that the ground combat vehicle program has— 

(A) feasible, fully defined, and stable requirements; 

(B) been demonstrated in a relevant environment in accordance with section 2366b(a)(3)(D) of title 10, United 

States Code, and achieved technology readiness or maturity; 

(C) independent and high-confidence cost estimates; 

(D) sufficient funding available during fiscal year 2014 

and sufficient funding planned for the period covered by 

the current future-years defense plan; and 

(E) a realistic and achievable schedule. 

SEC. 213. LIMITATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR UNMANNED CARRIER-LAUNCHED SURVEILLANCE AND 

STRIKE SYSTEM PROGRAM. 

(a) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF AIR VEHICLES.—The Secretary of 

Defense may not acquire more than six air vehicles of the unmanned 

carrier-launched surveillance and strike system prior to receiving 

milestone B approval (as defined in section 2366(e)(7) of title 10, 

United States Code) for engineering and manufacturing development and low-rate initial production. 

(b) QUARTERLY COST REPORTS.—Beginning 90 days after the date 

on which the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike 

system receives milestone A approval, and each 90-day period thereafter until such system receives milestone B approval, the Secretary 

of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report that includes, at a minimum— 

(1) the current cost estimate and schedule, as of the date of 

the report, for all segments of the unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program; 

(2) any changes to such cost estimate or schedule from the 

previous report; and 

(3) an explanation for any changes to the cost estimate or 

schedule or to the key performance parameters or key system attributes used for such program. 

(c) BUDGET DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT.—In the budget materials submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense in connection with the submission to Congress, pursuant to section 1105 

of title 31, United States Code, of the budget for fiscal year 2015, 

and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary shall include individual project lines for each program segment of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system, within program element 0604404N, that articulate all costs, contractual actions, and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
35 

other information associated with technology development for each 

such program segment. 

(d) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.— (1) REVIEW.—The Comptroller General of the United States 

shall annually conduct a review of the acquisition program for 

the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 1 of each year, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review under paragraph (1). 

(3) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (2) shall include such matters as the Comptroller General considers appropriate to fully inform the congressional defense committees of 

the status of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and 

strike system program. Such matters should include, at a minimum, the following: 

(A) The extent to which the unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program is meeting cost, 

schedule, and performance goals. 

(B) The progress and results of developmental testing. 

(C) An assessment of the acquisition strategy for the program, including whether the strategy is consistent with acquisition management best practices identified by the 

Comptroller General for the purposes of the program. 

(4) SUNSET.—The Comptroller General shall carry out this 

subsection until the earlier of— 

(A) the date on which the Secretary of the Navy awards 

a contract for the full-rate production of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system; or 

(B) the date on which the unmanned carrier-launched 

surveillance and strike system program is terminated. 

SEC. 214. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR AIR FORCE LOGISTICS TRANSFORMATION. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for procurement, Air Force, 

or research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for logistics information technology, including for the expeditionary combat 

support system, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the 

Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary will modernize and update 

the logistics information technology systems of the Air Force following the cancellation of the expeditionary combat support system. 

Such report shall include— 

(1) a detailed strategy and timeline for implementing the recommendations from the Expeditionary Combat Support System 

Acquisition Investigation Review Team Final Report; and 

(2) a description of the near-term options for maintaining or 

incrementally modernizing the logistics information technology 

systems of the Air Force until a replacement for the expeditionary combat support system can be determined. 

SEC. 215. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEFENSIVE 

CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS OF THE AIR FORCE. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for proVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
36 

curement, Air Force, or research, development, test, and evaluation, 

Air Force, for Defensive Cyberspace Operations (Program Element 

0202088F), not more than 90 percent may be obligated or expended 

until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which 

the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the Application Software Assurance Center 

of Excellence. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) A description of how the Application Software Assurance 

Center of Excellence is used to support the software assurance 

activities of the Air Force and other elements of the Department 

of Defense, including pursuant to section 933 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 

112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note). 

(2) A description of the resources used to support the Center 

of Excellence from the beginning of the Center through fiscal 

year 2014. 

(3) The plan of the Secretary for sustaining the Center of Excellence during the period covered by the future-years defense 

program submitted in 2013 under section 221 of title 10, United 

States Code. 

SEC. 216. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PRECISION 

EXTENDED RANGE MUNITION PROGRAM. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended for 

the precision extended range munition program until the date on 

which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff submits to the congressional defense committees written certification that— 

(1) such program is necessary to meet a valid operational 

need that cannot be met by the existing precision guided mortar 

munition of the Army, other indirect fire weapons, or aerial-delivered joint fires; and 

(2) a sufficient business case exists to proceed with the development and production of such program. 

SEC. 217. LONG-RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON REQUIREMENT; PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR NONCOMPETITIVE 

PROCEDURES FOR OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE 

WEAPON CONTRACTS OF THE NAVY. 

(a) LONG-RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop 

a follow-on air-launched cruise missile to the AGM–86 that— 

(A) achieves initial operating capability for conventional 

missions prior to the retirement of the conventionally 

armed AGM–86; 

(B) achieves initial operating capability for nuclear missions prior to the retirement of the nuclear-armed AGM–86; 

and 

(C) is capable of internal carriage and employment for 

both conventional and nuclear missions on the next-generation long-range strike bomber. 

(2) CONSECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT.—In developing a follow-on 

air-launched cruise missile to the AGM–86 in accordance with 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
37 

paragraph (1), the Secretary may carry out development and 

production activities with respect to nuclear missions prior to 

carrying out such activities with respect to conventional missions if the Secretary determines such consecutive order of development and production activities to be cost effective. 

(b) OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON CONTRACTS OF

THE NAVY.— (1) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided by paragraph (2), none 

of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the offensive antisurface warfare weapon may be used to enter into or modify a 

contract using procedures other than competitive procedures (as 

defined in section 2302(2) of title 10, United States Code). 

(2) EXEMPTION; WAIVER.— (A) EXEMPTED ACTIVITIES.—The prohibition in paragraph (1) shall not apply to funds specified in such paragraph that are made available for the development, testing, 

and fielding of aircraft-launched offensive anti-surface warfare weapons capabilities. 

(B) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in paragraph 

(1) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the 

national security interests of the United States. 

SEC. 218. REVIEW OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR F–35 AIRCRAFT. 

(a) SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.— (1) REVIEW.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics shall establish an independent team 

consisting of subject matter experts to review the development of 

software for the F–35 aircraft program (in this subsection referred to as the ‘‘software development program’’), including by 

reviewing the progress made with respect to— 

(A) managing the software development program; and 

(B) delivering critical software capability in accordance 

with current program milestones. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 3, 2014, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report on the review under paragraph (1). Such report shall include the following: 

(A) An assessment by the independent team with respect 

to whether the software development program— 

(i) has been successful in meeting the key milestone 

dates occurring before the date of the report; and 

(ii) will be successful in meeting the established program schedule. 

(B) Any recommendations of the independent team with 

respect to improving the software development program to 

ensure that, in support of the start of initial operational 

testing, the established program schedule is met on time. 

(C) If the independent team determines that the software 

development program will be unable to deliver the full complement of software within the established program schedule, any potential alternatives that the independent team 

considers appropriate to deliver such software within such 

schedule. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
38 

(b) AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT

REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act, the Under Secretary, in consultation with the Joint 

Strike Fighter Joint Program Office, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on current plans, as of the date 

of the report, for long-term sustainment of the autonomic logistics 

information system of F–35 aircraft. Such report shall include the 

following: 

(1) Current plans for acquisition of technical data rights to 

autonomic logistics information system software and the potential competitive sustainment of elements of the autonomic logistics information system. 

(2) How sustainment of the autonomic logistics information 

system may take advantage of public-private partnerships authorized by section 2474 of title 10, United States Code, including schedules for actions necessary for such sustainment. 

(3) Any current plan to select, designate, and activate any 

Government-owned and Government-operated site to serve as 

the autonomic logistics operating unit. 

(4) Current plans to ensure that the autonomic logistics information system provides total asset visibility and accountability, 

including asset valuation and tracking, and for potential integration with other automated logistics systems. 

SEC. 219. EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND SYSTEM. 

(a) PROJECT CODES FOR BUDGET SUBMISSIONS.—In the budget 

submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 of title 

31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent 

fiscal year, each capability component within the distributed common ground system program shall be set forth as a separate project 

code within the program element line, and each covered official 

shall submit supporting justification for the project code within the 

program element descriptive summary. 

(b) ANALYSIS.— 

(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct an analysis 

of capability components that are compliant with the intelligence community data standards and could be used to meet 

the requirements of the distributed common ground system program. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The analysis required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) Revalidation of the distributed common ground system program requirements based on current program 

needs, recent operational experience, and the requirement 

for nonproprietary solutions that adhere to open-architecture principles. 

(B) Market research of current commercially available 

tools to determine whether any such tools could potentially 

satisfy the requirements described in subparagraph (A). 

(C) Analysis of the competitive acquisition options for any 

tools identified in subparagraph (B). 

(3) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
39 

the congressional defense committees the results of the analysis 

conducted under paragraph (1). 

(c) COVERED OFFICIAL DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered official’’ means the following: 

(1) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to matters concerning the Army. 

(2) The Secretary of the Navy, with respect to matters concerning the Navy. 

(3) The Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to matters 

concerning the Air Force. 

(4) The Commandant of the Marine Corps, with respect to 

matters concerning the Marine Corps. 

(5) The Commander of the United States Special Operations 

Command, with respect to matters concerning the United States 

Special Operations Command. 

SEC. 220. OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) it remains the policy of the United States, as expressed in 

section 913(a) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 

2355), to demonstrate, acquire, and deploy an effective capability for operationally responsive space to support military 

users and operations from space, which shall consist of— 

(A) responsive satellite payloads and busses built to common technical standards; 

(B) low-cost space launch vehicles and supporting range 

operations that facilitate the timely launch and on-orbit operations of satellites; 

(C) responsive command and control capabilities; and 

(D) concepts of operations, tactics, techniques, and procedures that permit the use of responsive space assets for 

combat and military operations other than war; and 

(2) the Operationally Responsive Space Program Office has 

demonstrated through multiple launches since 2009 an ability 

to accomplish many of the policy objectives of the Operationally 

Responsive Space Program through specific missions, but has 

not executed a mission that leverages all policy objectives of 

such Program in a single mission. 

(b) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for the space-based infrared systems space modernization initiative wide-field-of-view testbed, not more than 50 

percent may be obligated or expended until the Executive Agent for 

Space of the Department of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of Defense is carrying out the 

Operationally Responsive Space Program Office in accordance with 

section 2273a of title 10, United States Code. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Executive Agent for Space of the Department 

of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding a potential mission that would seek to leverage all 

policy objectives of the Operationally Responsive Space Program in 

a single mission. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
40 

SEC. 221. SUSTAINMENT OR REPLACEMENT OF BLUE DEVIL INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE CAPABILITIES. 

(a) PLAN TO RETAIN CAPABILITY.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

shall develop a plan to sustain the operational capabilities of the 

Blue Devil 1 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Systems 

(in this section referred to as ‘‘Blue Devil 1 system’’), including precision signal geolocation, by— 

(1) procuring the existing Blue Devil 1 system; 

(2) developing a new system; or 

(3) basing a new system on capabilities that are adapted and 

integrated from existing programs and programs being developed. 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on— 

(1) the potential cost of procuring, operating, and sustaining 

current Blue Devil 1 systems for fiscal years 2014 through 2019, 

including costs relating to procurement, research and development, personnel, operation and maintenance, and military construction; 

(2) the ability of other current platforms and subsystems as 

of the date of the report to provide intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance support similar to the support provided by 

the current Blue Devil 1 system; and 

(3) a listing of programs of the Air Force and other programs 

of the Department of Defense in development as of the date of 

the report that could provide such similar support in the future. 

(c) REQUIREMENT TO COORDINATE.—In preparing the report under 

subsection (b), the Secretary shall— 

(1) coordinate with the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command regarding the operational needs of 

the United States Special Operations Command; and 

(2) coordinate with the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency with respect to information regarding 

the transfer to the Air Force of the technology developed under 

the wide-area network detection program for operational integration of wide-area motion imagery and near-vertical direction-finding data for effective target detection, identification, 

and tracking for potential incorporation, as practical and appropriate, into other platforms. 

(d) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
41 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

SEC. 231. IMPROVEMENTS TO ACQUISITION ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS ON BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM. 

(a) IMPROVEMENT TO OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT COST ESTIMATES.—In preparing the acquisition accountability reports on the 

ballistic missile defense system required by section 225 of title 10, 

United States Code, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall 

improve the quality of cost estimates relating to operations and 

sustainment that are included in such reports under subsection 

(b)(3)(A) of such section, including with respect to the confidence levels of such cost estimates. 

(b) OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT RESPONSIBILITY.—Section 225 

of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) OPERATIONS AND SUSTAINMENT COST ESTIMATES.—The Director shall ensure that each life-cycle cost estimate included in an 

acquisition baseline pursuant to subsection (b)(3)(A) includes— 

‘‘(1) all of the operations and sustainment costs for which the 

Director is responsible; and 

‘‘(2) a description of the operations and sustainment functions 

and costs for which a military department is responsible.’’. 

(c) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

outlining the plans of the Director to improve the quality of cost 

estimates pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include— 

(A) a description of the actions planned to improve the 

quality of cost estimates included in the acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense system 

required by section 225 of title 10, United States Code; 

(B) the schedule for such planned actions, including the 

planned schedule for meeting the requirements of subsection (e) of such section 225, as added by subsection (b); 

(C) a description of any steps taken during the previous 

year to improve the quality of such cost estimates; 

(D) an assessment of how the planned improvements 

compare to the best practices and cost-estimation guidelines 

recommended by the Comptroller General of the United 

States for cost estimates of the ballistic missile defense system; 

(E) any other matters the Director considers appropriate; 

and 

(F) the views of the Comptroller General of the United 

States with respect to the contents of the report. 

(3) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form. 

SEC. 232. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR MEADS PROGRAM. 

None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
42 

Defense may be obligated or expended for the medium extended air 

defense system. 

SEC. 233. PROHIBITION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INTEGRATION OF CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS; REPORT 

ON REGIONAL BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 

(a) PROHIBITION ON INTEGRATION OF CERTAIN SYSTEMS.— (1) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that 

missile defense systems of the People’s Republic of China should 

not be integrated into the missile defense systems of the United 

States or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 

(2) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 

2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to integrate missile defense systems of the People’s Republic of China into missile defense systems of the United 

States. 

(b) REPORT ON REGIONAL BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report on the status 

and progress of regional missile defense programs and efforts. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include 

the following: 

(A) A description of the overall risk assessment from the 

most recent Global Ballistic Missile Defense Assessment of 

regional missile defense capabilities relative to meeting the 

operational needs of the commanders of the geographic 

combatant commands, including the need for force protection of forward-deployed forces and capabilities of the 

United States and for the defense of allies and partners of 

the United States. 

(B) An assessment of whether and how the currently 

planned phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in 

Europe and other planned regional missile defense approaches and capabilities of the United States meet the integrated priorities of the commanders of the geographic 

combatant commands to achieve the operational requirements of the commanders to defend against the ballistic 

missile threat to deployed forces of the United States and 

allies of the United States, including a description of 

planned force structure deployment options to increase missile defense capabilities in the area of responsibility of a 

commander, if needed, in the event of warning of an imminent ballistic missile attack. 

(C) A detailed explanation of the current and planned 

concept of operations for the phased, adaptive approach to 

missile defense in Europe, including— 

(i) arrangements for allocating the command of assets of such approach between the Commander of the 

United States European Command and the Supreme 

Allied Commander, Europe; 

(ii) an explanation of the circumstances under which 

such command would be allocated to each commander; 

and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
43 

(iii) a description of the prioritization of defense of 

both the deployed forces of the United States and the 

territory of the member states of the North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization using available missile defense interceptor inventory. 

(D) A description of the progress made in the development and testing of elements of systems intended for deployment in phases 2 and 3 of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, including the standard 

missile–3 block IB, the standard missile–3 block IIA interceptors, and the Aegis Ashore system, and any areas where 

work remains to ensure such phases are ready for deployment as specified in the 2010 Ballistic Missile Defense Review. 

(E) A description of the manner in which elements of regional missile defense architectures, such as forward-based 

X-band radars in Japan, Israel, Turkey, and the area of responsibility of the Commander of the United States Central 

Command, contribute to the enhancement of the homeland 

defense of the United States. 

(F) A description of the manner in which enhanced integration of offensive military capabilities and defensive missile defense capabilities, including the potential for improved intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, will 

fit into regional missile defense planning and force structure assessments. 

(G) A description of how the contributions of allies and 

partners of the United States that have purchased missile 

defense technology of the United States could aid in reducing the costs of deployment of regional missile defense capabilities of the United States, and how the systems of such 

allies and partners could be better networked and integrated to provide mutual force multiplication benefits. 

(H) A description of how the Secretary of Defense is working with allies and partners of the United States that have 

purchased air and missile defense technology of the United 

States to integrate the capabilities of such allies and partners provided by such technology with the air and missile 

defense systems and networks of the United States to provide mutual benefit. 

(I) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

SEC. 234. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CO-PRODUCTION OF IRON 

DOME SHORT-RANGE ROCKET DEFENSE SYSTEM IN THE 

UNITED STATES. 

(a) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.— (1) IN GENERAL.— Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for 

the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $15,000,000 may be 

obligated or expended for nonrecurring engineering costs in conVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
44 

nection with the establishment of a capacity for co-production 

in the United States by industry of the United States of parts 

and components for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense 

program. Such obligation or expenditure shall be made pursuant to an agreement described in paragraph (2). 

(2) AGREEMENT DESCRIBED.—An agreement described in this 

paragraph is an agreement entered into by the Government of 

the United States and the Government of Israel with respect to 

the co-production in the United States of parts and components 

for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program. 

(b) REPORT ON CO-PRODUCTION.—Not later than 30 days after obligating or expending funds specified in subsection (a), the Director 

of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the plan to implement an agreement 

described in paragraph (2) of such subsection, including the following: 

(1) A description of the estimated cost of implementing the 

agreement, including the costs to be paid by industry. 

(2) The expected schedule to implement the agreement. 

(3) A description of any efforts to minimize the costs of the 

agreement to the Government of the United States. 

(c) REPORT ON MISSILE DEFENSE COOPERATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on the status of 

missile defense cooperation between the United States and 

Israel. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include 

the following: 

(A) A description of the current program of ballistic missile defense cooperation between the United States and 

Israel, including the objectives and results of such cooperation as of the date of the report. 

(B) A description of steps taken during the year prior to 

the report, and steps planned to be taken during the year 

following the report, by the governments of the United 

States and Israel to improve the coordination, interoperability, and integration of the missile defense capabilities of 

the United States and Israel. 

(C) A description of joint missile defense exercises and 

training that have been conducted by the United States and 

Israel, and the lessons learned from such exercises. 

(D) A description of joint efforts of the United States and 

Israel to develop ballistic missile defense technologies and 

capabilities. 

(E) Any other matters that the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to 

alter or affect the procurement schedule, or anticipated procurement 

numbers, under the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program. 

(e) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) second-source production of parts and components of the 

Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program that is based in 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
45 

the United States is in the national security interest of both 

Israel and the United States; and 

(2) the move towards such a second-source capacity in the 

United States for integration and assembly of all-up rounds of 

the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program will further 

enhance the security of Israel by ensuring added production capability of such vital program. 

SEC. 235. ADDITIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE UNITED STATES HOMELAND. 

(a) DEPLOYMENT OF LONG-RANGE DISCRIMINATING RADAR.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Missile Defense Agency 

shall deploy a long-range discriminating radar against longrange ballistic missile threats from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Such radar shall be located at a location optimized to support the defense of the homeland of the United 

States. 

(2) FUNDING.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the Missile Defense Agency for BMD Sensors (PE 

63884C), as specified in the funding table in section 4201, 

$30,000,000 shall be available for initial costs toward the deployment of the radar required by paragraph (1). 

(b) ADDITIONAL SENSOR COVERAGE FOR THREATS FROM IRAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that 

the Secretary is able to deploy additional tracking and discrimination sensor capabilities to support the defense of the 

homeland of the United States from future long-range ballistic 

missile threats that emerge from Iran. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that details what sensor capabilities of the United States, including re-locatable land- and 

sea-based capabilities, are or will become available to support 

the defense of the homeland of the United States from future 

long-range ballistic missile threats that emerge from Iran. Such 

report shall include the following: 

(A) With respect to the capabilities included in the report, 

an identification of such capabilities that can be located on 

the Atlantic-side of the United States by not later than 

2019, or sooner if long-range ballistic missile threats from 

Iran are successfully flight-tested prior to 2019. 

(B) A description of the manner in which the United 

States will maintain such capabilities so as to ensure the 

deployment of the capabilities in time to support the missile 

defense of the United States from long-range ballistic missile threats from Iran. 

SEC. 236. EVALUATION OF OPTIONS FOR FUTURE BALLISTIC MISSILE 

DEFENSE SENSOR ARCHITECTURES. 

(a) EVALUATION REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through 

the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall 

conduct an evaluation of options and alternatives for future 

sensor architectures for ballistic missile defense in order to enVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
46 

hance the ballistic missile defense capabilities of the United 

States. 

(2) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consult with the heads of departments and agencies 

of the Federal Government that the Secretary determines appropriate. 

(3) SCOPE OF EVALUATION.—In conducting the evaluation 

under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall consider the following: 

(A) A wide range of options for a future sensor architecture for ballistic missile defense, including— 

(i) options regarding the future development, integration, exploitation, and deployment of existing or new 

missile defense sensor systems and assets; and 

(ii) options regarding using capabilities of the Federal Government that exist or are planned as of the 

date of the evaluation that are not primarily focused on 

missile defense, including such capabilities that may 

require modification to be used for missile defense. 

(B) The potential costs, advantages, and feasibility of 

using such future sensor architecture for purposes other 

than missile defense, including for technical intelligence 

collection or space situational awareness. 

(C) Whether and how such future sensor architectures 

could be designed and employed to fulfill missions other 

than missile defense when not required for such missile defense missions. 

(4) OBJECTIVE.—The objective of the evaluation shall be to 

identify one or more future sensor architectures for ballistic 

missile defense that will result in an improvement of the performance of the ballistic missile defense system in a cost-effective, operationally effective, timely, and affordable manner. 

(b) ELEMENTS TO BE EVALUATED.—The evaluation required by 

subsection (a) shall include a consideration of the following: 

(1) SENSOR TYPES.—At a minimum, the types of sensors as 

follows: 

(A) Radar. 

(B) Infrared. 

(C) Optical and electro-optical. 

(D) Directed energy. 

(2) SENSOR MODES.—Deployment modes of sensors as follows: 

(A) Ground-based sensors. 

(B) Sea-based sensors. 

(C) Airborne sensors. 

(D) Space-based sensors. 

(3) SENSOR FUNCTIONS.—At a minimum, missile defense-related sensor functions as follows: 

(A) Detection. 

(B) Tracking. 

(C) Characterization. 

(D) Classification. 

(E) Discrimination. 

(F) Debris mitigation. 

(G) Kill assessment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
47 

(4) SENSOR ARCHITECTURE CAPABILITIES.—At a minimum, 

maximization or improvement of sensor-related capabilities as 

follows: 

(A) Handling of increasing raid sizes. 

(B) Precision tracking of threat missiles. 

(C) Providing fire-control quality tracks of evolving threat 

missiles. 

(D) Enabling launch-on-remote and engage-on-remote capabilities. 

(E) Discriminating lethal objects (warheads) from other 

objects. 

(F) Effectively assessing the results of engagements. 

(G) Enabling enhanced shot doctrine. 

(H) Other capabilities that the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate. 

(c) REPORT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the results of 

the evaluation required by subsection (a). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include 

the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Secretary 

with respect to— 

(A) future sensor architectures evaluated under subsection (a)(3)(A)(i). 

(B) existing or planned capabilities of the Federal Government evaluated under subsection (a)(3)(A)(ii); 

(C) using future sensor architecture for additional purposes as described in subsection (a)(3)(B); and 

(D) the design and employment of future sensor architectures to fulfill missions other than missile defense as described in subsection (a)(3)(C). 

(3) FORM.—The report shall be submitted in unclassified 

form, but may include a classified annex. 

(d) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 224 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 1675) is repealed. 

SEC. 237. PLANS TO IMPROVE THE GROUND-BASED MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SYSTEM. 

(a) IMPROVED KILL ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY.—The Director of the 

Missile Defense Agency, in consultation with the Commander of the 

United States Strategic Command and the Commander of the 

United States Northern Command, shall develop— 

(1) options to achieve an improved kill assessment capability 

for the ground-based midcourse defense system that can be developed as soon as practicable with acceptable acquisition risk, 

with the objective of achieving initial operating capability by 

not later than December 31, 2019, including by improving— 

(A) the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the ground-based 

interceptor; 

(B) the command, control, battle management, and communications system; and 

(C) the sensor and communications architecture of the 

ballistic missile defense system; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
48 

(2) a plan to carry out such options that gives priority to including such improved capabilities in at least some of the 14 

ground-based interceptors that will be procured by the Director, 

as announced by the Secretary of Defense on March 15, 2013. 

(b) IMPROVED HIT ASSESSMENT.—The Director, in consultation 

with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command and 

the Commander of the United States Northern Command, shall 

take appropriate steps to develop an interim capability for improved 

hit assessment for the ground-based midcourse defense system that 

can be integrated into near-term exo-atmospheric kill vehicle upgrades and refurbishment. 

(c) REPORT ON IMPROVED CAPABILITIES.—Not later than April 1, 

2014, the Director, the Commander of the United States Strategic 

Command, and the Commander of the United States Northern 

Command shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on— 

(1) the development of an improved kill assessment capability 

under subsection (a), including the plan developed under paragraph (2) of such subsection; and 

(2) the development of an interim capability for improved hit 

assessment under subsection (b). 

(d) PLAN FOR UPGRADED ENHANCED EXO-ATMOSPHERIC KILL VEHICLE.— 

(1) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a plan to use covered funding 

to develop, test, and deploy an upgraded enhanced exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the ground-based midcourse defense system that— 

(A) is tested under a test program coordinated with the 

Director of Operational Test and Evaluation; and 

(B) following such test program, is capable of being deployed during fiscal year 2018 or thereafter. 

(2) PRIORITY.—In developing the plan for an upgraded enhanced exo-atmospheric kill vehicle under paragraph (1), the 

Director shall give priority to the following attributes: 

(A) Cost effectiveness and high reliability, testability, 

producibility, modularity, and maintainability. 

(B) Capability across the midcourse battle space. 

(C) Ability to leverage ballistic missile defense system 

data with kill vehicle on-board capability to discriminate 

lethal objects. 

(D) Reliable on-demand communications. 

(E) Sufficient flexibility to ensure that the potential for 

future enhancements, including ballistic missile defense 

system interceptor commonality and multiple and volume 

kill capability, is maintained. 

(3) COVERED FUNDING DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term 

‘‘covered funding’’ means— 

(A) funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Missile Defense Agency, as specified in the funding table in section 4201; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
49 

(B) funds authorized to be appropriated by the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 

112–239) or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2013 

that are available to the Director to carry out the plan 

under paragraph (1). 

SEC. 238. REPORT ON POTENTIAL FUTURE HOMELAND BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE OPTIONS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 240 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on potential future options for enhancing the ballistic missile defense of the homeland of 

the United States. 

(b) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall prepare the report under 

subsection (a) in consultation with the Commander of the United 

States Strategic Command, the Commander of the United States 

Northern Command, and the Director of the Missile Defense Agency. 

(c) ELEMENTS.—The report under subsection (a) shall include the 

following: 

(1) A description of the current assessment of the threat to the 

United States from limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate), particularly from countries such as North Korea and Iran, and an assessment of the 

projected future threat through 2022, including a discussion of 

confidence levels and uncertainties in such threat assessment. 

(2) A description of the current capability of the ballistic missile defense of the homeland of the United States to defend 

against the current threat of limited ballistic missile attack 

(whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate), particularly 

from countries such as North Korea and Iran. 

(3) A description of the status of efforts to correct the problems that caused the flight test failures of the ground-based 

midcourse defense system in December 2010 and July 2013 and 

plans for future efforts, including additional flight testing, to 

demonstrate that the problems have been successfully corrected. 

(4) A description of planned improvements to the current ballistic missile defense system of the homeland of the United 

States, and the enhancements to the capability of such system 

that would result from such planned improvements, including— 

(A) deployment of 14 additional ground-based interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska; 

(B) missile defense upgrades of early warning radars at 

Clear, Alaska, and Cape Cod, Massachusetts; 

(C) deployment of an in-flight interceptor communications system data terminal at Fort Drum, New York; and 

(D) improvements to the effectiveness and reliability of 

the ground-based interceptors and the overall ground-based 

midcourse defense system. 

(5) In accordance with subsection (d), a description of potential additional future options for the ballistic missile defense of 

the homeland of the United States, in addition to the improvements described in paragraph (4), if future ballistic missile 

threats warrant deployment of such options to increase the capabilities of such ballistic missile defense, including— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
50 

(A) deployment of a missile defense interceptor site on the 

East Coast; 

(B) deployment of a missile defense interceptor site in another location in the United States, other than on the East 

Coast; 

(C) expansion of Missile Field–1 at Fort Greely, Alaska, 

to an operationally available 20-silo configuration, to permit further interceptor deployments; 

(D) deployment of additional ground-based interceptors 

for the ground-based midcourse defense system at Fort 

Greely, Alaska, or Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, 

or both; 

(E) deployment of additional missile defense sensors, including at a site in Alaska as well as an X-band radar on 

or near the East Coast or elsewhere, to enhance system 

tracking and discrimination, including various sensor options; 

(F) enhancements to the operational effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and overall performance of the ground-based 

midcourse defense system through improvements to system 

reliability, discrimination, battle management, exo-atmospheric kill vehicle capability, and related functions; 

(G) the potential for future enhancement and deployment 

of the standard missile–3 block IIA interceptor to augment 

the ballistic missile defense of the homeland of the United 

States; 

(H) missile defense options to defend the homeland of the 

United States against ballistic missiles that could be 

launched from vessels on the seas around the United 

States, including the Gulf of Mexico, or other ballistic missile threats that could approach the United States from the 

south, should such a threat arise in the future; and 

(I) any other options the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(d) EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL OPTIONS.—For each option described under subsection (c)(5), the Secretary shall provide an evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of such option. The 

evaluation of each such option shall include consideration of the following: 

(1) Technical feasibility. 

(2) Operational effectiveness and utility against the projected 

future threat. 

(3) Cost, cost effectiveness, and affordability. 

(4) Schedule considerations. 

(5) Agility to respond to changes in future threat evolution. 

(e) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—Based on the evaluations required by subsection (d), the Secretary shall include in the 

report under subsection (a) such findings, conclusions, and recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for potential 

future options for the ballistic missile defense of the homeland of the 

United States. 

(f) FORM.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in 

unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
51 

SEC. 239. BRIEFINGS ON STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN 

MISSILE DEFENSE MATTERS. 

Not later than 180 days after the completion of the site evaluation 

study required by subsection (a) of section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 

126 Stat. 1678), and again one year after such date, the Secretary 

of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a 

detailed briefing on the current status of efforts and plans to implement the requirements of such section, including— 

(1) the progress and plans toward preparation of the environmental impact statement required by subsection (b) of such section; and 

(2) the development of the contingency plan under subsection 

(d) of such section for deployment of an additional homeland 

missile defense interceptor site in case the President determines 

to proceed with such an additional deployment. 

SEC. 240. SENSE OF CONGRESS AND REPORT ON NATO AND MISSILE 

DEFENSE BURDEN-SHARING. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that as defense budget resources continue to decline in the United States, including by reason of funding reductions under the Budget Control 

Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25), and the sequestration in effect by 

reason of such Act, the importance of burden-sharing among members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for missile defense 

is increasing. 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on the cost of missile 

defense for members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (in 

this section referred to as ‘‘NATO’’), including the phased, adaptive 

approach to missile defense in Europe, and the contributions made 

by members of NATO for such missile defense. 

(c) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (b) shall include the following: 

(1) The total estimated cost directly attributable to the various phases of the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense 

in Europe, including costs relating to research, development, 

testing, and evaluation, procurement, and military construction. 

(2) With respect to the cost of missile defense for NATO, including the phased, adaptive approach to missile defense in Europe, a description of the level of burden-sharing among members of NATO as of the date of the report, including through 

contributions made by a member in the form of hosting elements of such approach to missile defense in the territory of the 

member. 

(3) An assessment of, and recommendations for, areas where 

the Secretary determines that NATO and the members of NATO 

could improve the burden-sharing among members with respect 

to the cost of missile defense for NATO described in paragraph 

(2), including through the possible pooling of missile defense 

interceptors. 

(d) FORM.—The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
52 

SEC. 241. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DEPLOYMENT OF REGIONAL BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE CAPABILITIES. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the United States develops and deploys regional ballistic 

missile defense capabilities to protect the forward-deployed 

forces, allies, and partners of the United States against regional 

ballistic missile threats, consistent with the security obligations 

of the United States and as part of the broader theater security 

and military plans of the geographic combatant commanders of 

the United States; 

(2) in deciding on the deployment of regional missile defense 

assets and capabilities of the United States, the Secretary of Defense should give priority consideration to the capabilities needed to deter and defend against the ballistic missile threat, including the recommendations of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and 

the priorities of the geographic combatant commanders for 

meeting the operational needs of the commanders for ballistic 

missile defense; 

(3) such deployment decisions should take into account all of 

the ballistic missile threats to the forces, allies, and partners of 

the United States in each region; 

(4) the United States should encourage the allies and partners of the United States to acquire and contribute to integrated 

and complementary regional ballistic missile defense capabilities—including coordination, data sharing, and networking arrangements—and such allied and partner capabilities should 

be taken into account in deciding on the deployment of regional 

missile defense capabilities of the United States; and 

(5) the United States should cooperate closely with the allies 

and partners of the United States, including such allies and 

partners in East Asia, on missile defense deployments and cooperation that enhance the mutual security of the United States 

and such allies and partners. 

SEC. 242. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PROCUREMENT OF CAPABILITY ENHANCEMENT II EXOATMOSPHERIC KILL VEHICLE. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should not 

procure a Capability Enhancement II exoatmospheric kill vehicle for 

deployment until after the date on which a successful intercept 

flight test of the Capability Enhancement II ground-based interceptor has occurred, unless such procurement is for test assets or to 

maintain a warm line for the industrial base. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

SEC. 251. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON THE AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE ACQUISITION PROGRAM. 

(a) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.—During the period beginning on the 

date of the enactment of this Act and ending on March 1, 2018, the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an annual 

review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of each year beginning in 2014 and ending in 2018, the Comptroller General 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
53 

the review of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program conducted under subsection (a). 

(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report under paragraph 

(1) shall include the following: 

(A) The extent to which the program is meeting development and procurement cost, schedule, performance, and 

risk mitigation goals. 

(B) With respect to meeting the desired initial operational 

capability and full operational capability dates for the amphibious combat vehicle, the progress and results of— 

(i) developmental and operational testing of the vehicle; and 

(ii) plans for correcting deficiencies in vehicle performance, operational effectiveness, reliability, suitability, and safety. 

(C) An assessment of procurement plans, production results, and efforts to improve manufacturing efficiency and 

supplier performance. 

(D) An assessment of the acquisition strategy of the amphibious combat vehicle, including whether such strategy is 

in compliance with acquisition management best-practices 

and the acquisition policy and regulations of the Department of Defense. 

(E) An assessment of the projected operations and support costs and the viability of the Marine Corps to afford 

to operate and sustain the amphibious combat vehicle. 

(3) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—In submitting to the congressional defense committees the first report under paragraph (1) 

and a report following any changes made by the Secretary of 

the Navy to the baseline documentation of the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program, the Comptroller General shall 

include, with respect to such program, an assessment of the sufficiency and objectivity of— 

(A) the analysis of alternatives; 

(B) the initial capabilities document; and 

(C) the capabilities development document. 

SEC. 252. ANNUAL COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES 

REPORT ON THE ACQUISITION PROGRAM FOR THE VXX 

PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER. 

(a) ANNUAL GAO REVIEW.—The Comptroller General of the 

United States shall conduct annually a review of the acquisition 

program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 each year, the 

Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the review conducted under subsection 

(a) during the preceding year. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include such matters as the Comptroller General considers appropriate to fully inform the congressional defense committees of 

the stage of the acquisition process for the VXX Presidential 

Helicopter aircraft covered by the review described in such report. Such matters may include the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
54 

(A) The extent to which the acquisition program for the 

VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft is meeting cost, schedule, and performance goals. 

(B) The progress and results of developmental testing. 

(C) An assessment of the acquisition strategy for the program, including whether the strategy is consistent with acquisition management best practices identified by the 

Comptroller General for purposes of the program. 

(c) SUNSET.—The requirements in this section shall terminate 

upon the earlier of— 

(1) the date on which the Navy awards a contract for full-rate 

production for the VXX Presidential Helicopter aircraft; or 

(2) the date on which the acquisition program for such aircraft is terminated. 

SEC. 253. REPORT ON STRATEGY TO IMPROVE BODY ARMOR. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the comprehensive research and development strategy of the Secretary to achieve significant reductions in the weight of body armor. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) A brief description of each solution for body armor weight 

reduction that is being developed as of the date of the report. 

(2) For each such solution— 

(A) the costs, schedules, and performance requirements; 

(B) the research and development funding profile; 

(C) a description of the materials being used in the solution; and 

(D) the feasibility and technology readiness levels of the 

solution and the materials. 

(3) A strategy to provide resources for future research and development of body armor weight reduction. 

(4) An explanation of how the Secretary is using a modular 

or tailorable solution to approach body armor weight reduction. 

(5) A description of how the Secretary coordinates the research and development of body armor weight reduction being 

carried out by the military departments. 

(6) Any other matter the Secretary considers appropriate. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

SEC. 261. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY REVIEW 

AND ADVISORY BOARD. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 189. Communications Security Review and Advisory Board 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There shall be in the Department of Defense a Communications Security Review and Advisory Board (in 

this section referred to as the ‘Board’) to review and assess the comVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
55 

munications security, cryptographic modernization, and related key 

management activities of the Department and provide advice to the 

Secretary with respect to such activities. 

‘‘(b) MEMBERS.—(1) The Secretary shall determine the number of 

members of the Board. 

‘‘(2) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense 

shall serve as chairman of the Board. 

‘‘(3) The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of general 

or admiral and civilian employees of the Department of Defense in 

the Senior Executive Service to serve as members of the Board. 

‘‘(c) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Board shall— 

‘‘(1) monitor the overall communications security, cryptographic modernization, and key management efforts of the 

Department, including activities under major defense acquisition programs (as defined in section 139c of this title), by— 

‘‘(A) requiring each Chief Information Officer of each 

military department to report the communications security 

activities of the military department to the Board; 

‘‘(B) tracking compliance of each military department 

with respect to communications security modernization efforts; 

‘‘(C) validating lifecycle communications security modernization plans for major defense acquisition programs; 

‘‘(2) validate the need to replace cryptographic equipment 

based on the expiration dates of the equipment and evaluate the 

risks of continuing to use cryptographic equipment after such 

expiration dates; 

‘‘(3) convene in-depth program reviews for specific cryptographic modernization developments with respect to validating requirements and identifying programmatic risks; 

‘‘(4) develop a long-term roadmap for communications security to identify potential issues and ensure synchronization with 

major planning documents; and 

‘‘(5) advise the Secretary on the cryptographic posture of the 

Department, including budgetary recommendations. 

‘‘(d) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN PROGRAMS.—The Board shall not include the consideration of programs funded under the National Intelligence Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying out this section.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 188 the following new item: 

‘‘189. Communications Security Review and Advisory Board’’. 

SEC. 262. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF MECHANISMS TO PROVIDE 

FUNDS FOR DEFENSE LABORATORIES FOR RESEARCH 

AND DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR MILITARY 

MISSIONS. 

(a) CLARIFICATION OF AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Section 219 of 

the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(1)(D), by striking ‘‘and recapitalization’’ 

through the period at the end and inserting ‘‘recapitalization, or 

minor military construction of the laboratory infrastructure, in 

accordance with subsection (b).’’; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
56 

(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) 

and (d), respectively; and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this subsection, 

funds available under a mechanism under subsection (a)(1)(D) 

that are solely intended to carry out a laboratory infrastructure 

project shall be available for such project until expended. 

‘‘(2) PRIOR NOTICE OF COSTS OF PROJECTS.—Funds shall be 

available in accordance with paragraph (1) for a project referred to in such paragraph only if the Secretary notifies the 

congressional defense committees of the total cost of the project 

before the date on which the Secretary uses a mechanism under 

subsection (a)(1)(D) for such project. 

‘‘(3) ACCUMULATION OF FUNDS FOR PROJECTS.—Funds may 

accumulate under a mechanism under subsection (a) for a 

project referred to in paragraph (1) for not more than five years. 

‘‘(4) COST LIMIT COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary shall ensure 

that a project referred to in paragraph (1) for which funds are 

made available in accordance with such paragraph complies 

with the applicable cost limitations in the following provisions 

of law: 

‘‘(A) Section 2805(d) of title 10, United States Code, with 

respect to revitalization and recapitalization projects. 

‘‘(B) Section 2811 of such title, with respect to repair 

projects.’’. 

(b) EXTENSION.—Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated 

by subsection (a)(2) of this section, is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2020’’. 

(c) APPLICATION.—Subsection (b) of such section 219, as added by 

subsection (a)(3), shall apply with respect to funds made available 

under such section on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 263. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO AWARD PRIZES FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ACHIEVEMENTS. 

Section 2374a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2018’’. 

SEC. 264. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM TO INCLUDE 

TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION FEATURES DURING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN DEFENSE SYSTEMS. 

Section 243(d) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) 

is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 

2020’’. 

SEC. 265. BRIEFING ON BIOMETRICS ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT 

OF DEFENSE. 

(a) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on an assessment of the future program structure for 

biometrics oversight and execution and architectural requirements 

for biometrics-enabling capability. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
57 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The briefing under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the roles and responsibilities of the principal staff assistant for biometrics, the program manager for 

biometrics, and the Defense Forensics and Biometrics Agency, 

including— 

(A) the roles and responsibilities of each element of the 

Department of Defense, including each military department, with responsibility for biometrics and each such element that is responsible for requirements and testing regarding biometrics; and 

(B) whether the executive management responsibilities of 

the Department of Defense program manager for biometrics 

should be retained by the Army or transferred to another 

element of the Department. 

(2) An assessment of the current requirements for biometricsenabling capability, including with respect to— 

(A) a governance process for capturing, vetting, and validating requirements and business processes across military 

department, interagency, and international partners; and 

(B) a process to determine resourcing business rules to establish and sustain such capabilities. 

(3) An evaluation of the most appropriate element of the Department to take responsibility for defining and managing the 

end-to-end performance of the biometric enterprise, beginning 

and ending at the point of biometric encounter, as described in 

the report of the Comptroller General of the United States titled 

‘‘Defense Biometrics: Additional Training for Leaders and More 

Timely Transmission of Data Could Enhance the Use of Biometrics in Afghanistan’’, numbered 12–442. 

SEC. 266. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON IMPORTANCE OF ALIGNING COMMON MISSILE COMPARTMENT OF OHIO-CLASS REPLACEMENT PROGRAM WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM’S VANGUARD SUCCESSOR PROGRAM. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of the Navy should make every effort to ensure that the 

common missile compartment associated with the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine replacement program stays on schedule and 

is aligned with the Vanguard-successor program of the United 

Kingdom in order for the United States to fulfill its longstanding 

commitment to our ally and partner in sea-based strategic deterrence. 

SEC. 267. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COUNTER-ELECTRONICS HIGH 

POWER MICROWAVE MISSILE PROJECT. 

It is the sense of the Congress that— 

(1) in carrying out the non-kinetic counter-electronics developmental planning effort of the Air Force, the Secretary of Defense 

should consider the results of the successful joint technology capability demonstration that the counter-electronics high power 

microwave missile project conducted in 2012; 

(2) an analysis of alternatives is an important step in the 

long-term development of a non-kinetic counter-electronic system; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
58 

(3) the Secretary should pursue both near- and far-term joint 

non-kinetic counter-electronic systems; and 

(4) the counter-electronics high power microwave missile 

project (or a variant thereof) should be considered among the 

options for a possible materiel solution in response to any nearterm joint urgent operational need, joint emergent operational 

need, or combatant command integrated priority for a non-kinetic counter-electronic system. 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND 

MAINTENANCE 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 301. Operation and maintenance funding. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environment 

Sec. 311. Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities relating to operational energy strategy. 

Sec. 312. Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities. 

Sec. 313. Reauthorization of Sikes Act. 

Sec. 314. Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn pits. 

Sec. 315. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

Sec. 321. Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment. 

Sec. 322. Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report. 

Sec. 323. Consideration of Army arsenals’ capabilities to fulfill manufacturing requirements. 

Sec. 324. Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of operating forces used to support overseas contingency operations. 

Sec. 325. Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan. 

Sec. 326. Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Sec. 331. Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit readiness. 

Sec. 332. Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for equipment readiness and strategic capability. 

Sec. 333. Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding 

information technology capital assets. 

Sec. 334. Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention reporting requirements. 

Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority 

Sec. 341. Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores. 

Sec. 342. Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration 

teams outside the United States. 

Sec. 343. Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations Command 

National Capital Region. 

Sec. 344. Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 351. Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units. 

Sec. 352. Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
59 

Subtitle A—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environment 

SEC. 311. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF REPORTS ON PROPOSED 

BUDGETS FOR ACTIVITIES RELATING TO OPERATIONAL 

ENERGY STRATEGY. 

Section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘Not later than 30 days after 

the date on which the budget for a fiscal year is submitted to 

Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of 

Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed 

budgets for that fiscal year’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed budgets 

for a fiscal year’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) The report required by paragraph (4) for a fiscal year shall 

be submitted by the later of the following dates: 

‘‘(A) The date that is 30 days after the date on which the 

budget for that fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to 

section 1105 of title 31. 

‘‘(B) March 31 of the previous fiscal year.’’. 

SEC. 312. FACILITATION OF INTERAGENCY COOPERATION IN CONSERVATION PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF DEFENSE, AGRICULTURE, AND INTERIOR TO AVOID OR REDUCE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON MILITARY READINESS ACTIVITIES. 

(a) USE OF FUNDS UNDER CERTAIN AGREEMENTS.—Section 2684a 

of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (h) and (i) as subsections (i) 

and (j), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h): 

‘‘(h) INTERAGENCY COOPERATION IN CONSERVATION PROGRAMS TO

AVOID OR REDUCE ADVERSE IMPACTS ON MILITARY READINESS ACTIVITIES.—In order to facilitate interagency cooperation and enhance the effectiveness of actions that will protect both the environment and military readiness, the recipient of funds provided pursuant an agreement under this section or under the Sikes Act (16 

U.S.C. et seq.) may, with regard to the lands and waters within the 

scope of the agreement, use such funds to satisfy any matching 

funds or cost-sharing requirement of any conservation program of 

the Department of Agriculture or the Department of the Interior notwithstanding any limitation of such program on the source of 

matching or cost-sharing funds.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
60 

(b) SUNSET.—This section and subsection (h) of section 2684a of 

title 10, United States Code, as added by this section, shall expire 

on October 1, 2019, except that any agreement referred to in such 

subsection that is entered into on or before September 30, 2019, 

shall continue according to its terms and conditions as if this section has not expired. 

SEC. 313. REAUTHORIZATION OF SIKES ACT. 

Section 108 of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670f) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2009 through 2014’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2014 through 2019’’. 

SEC. 314. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON DISPOSING OF WASTE 

IN OPEN-AIR BURN PITS. 

Section 317(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10 U.S.C. 

2701 note) is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

(2) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (Q); 

and 

(3) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 

subparagraphs: 

‘‘(C) tires; 

‘‘(D) treated wood; 

‘‘(E) batteries; 

‘‘(F) plastics, except insignificant amounts of plastic remaining after a good-faith effort to remove or recover plastic materials from the solid waste stream; 

‘‘(G) munitions and explosives, except when disposed of in 

compliance with guidance on the destruction of munitions 

and explosives contained in the Department of Defense Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards, DoD Manual 

6055.09-M; 

‘‘(H) compressed gas cylinders, unless empty with valves 

removed; 

‘‘(I) fuel containers, unless completely evacuated of its 

contents; 

‘‘(J) aerosol cans; 

‘‘(K) polychlorinated biphenyls; 

‘‘(L) petroleum, oils, and lubricants products (other than 

waste fuel for initial combustion); 

‘‘(M) asbestos; 

‘‘(N) mercury; 

‘‘(O) foam tent material; 

‘‘(P) any item containing any of the materials referred to 

in a preceding paragraph; and’’. 

SEC. 315. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR PROCUREMENT OF DROP-IN FUELS. 

(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make a bulk 

purchase of a drop-in fuel for operational purposes unless the cost 

of that drop-in fuel is cost-competitive with the cost of a traditional 

fuel available for the same purpose. 

(b) WAIVER.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
61 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the requirements of paragraph 

(2), the Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under 

subparagraph (a) with respect to a purchase. 

(2) NOTICE REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after issuing 

a waiver under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees notice of the waiver. Any 

such notice shall include each of the following: 

(A) The rationale of the Secretary for issuing the waiver 

(B) A certification that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States. 

(C) The expected cost of the purchase for which the waiver is issued. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this section— 

(1) The term ‘‘drop-in fuel’’ means a neat or blended liquid 

hydrocarbon fuel designed as a direct replacement for a traditional fuel with comparable performance characteristics and 

compatible with existing infrastructure and equipment 

(2) The term ‘‘traditional fuel’’ means a liquid hydrocarbon 

fuel derived or refined from petroleum. 

(3) The term ‘‘operational purposes’’ means for the purposes 

of conducting military operations, including training, exercises, 

large scale demonstrations, and moving and sustaining military forces and military platforms. Such term does not include 

research, development, testing, evaluation, fuel certification, or 

other demonstrations. 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

SEC. 321. STRATEGIC POLICY FOR PREPOSITIONED MATERIEL AND 

EQUIPMENT. 

(a) MODIFICATIONS TO STRATEGIC POLICY.—Section 2229(a) of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) POLICY REQUIRED.— ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall maintain a 

strategic policy on the programs of the Department of Defense 

for prepositioned materiel and equipment. Such policy shall 

take into account national security threats, strategic mobility, 

service requirements, and the requirements of the combatant 

commands, and shall address how the Department’s 

prepositioning programs, both ground and afloat, align with 

national defense strategies and departmental priorities. 

‘‘(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategic policy required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

‘‘(A) Overarching strategic guidance concerning planning 

and resource priorities that link the Department of Defense’s current and future needs for prepositioned stocks, 

such as desired responsiveness, to evolving national defense 

objectives. 

‘‘(B) A description of the Department’s vision for 

prepositioning programs and the desired end state. 

‘‘(C) Specific interim goals demonstrating how the vision 

and end state will be achieved. 

‘‘(D) A description of the strategic environment, requirements for, and challenges associated with, prepositioning. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
62 

‘‘(E) Metrics for how the Department will evaluate the extent to which prepositioned assets are achieving defense objectives. 

‘‘(F) A framework for joint departmental oversight that 

reviews and synchronizes the military services’ 

prepositioning strategies to minimize potentially duplicative 

efforts and maximize efficiencies in prepositioned materiel 

and equipment across the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(3) JOINT OVERSIGHT.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish joint oversight of the military services’ prepositioning efforts to maximize efficiencies across the Department of Defense.’’. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a plan for implementation of the prepositioning strategic policy required under section 

2229(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a). 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The implementation plan required under 

paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

(A) Detailed guidance for how the Department of Defense 

will achieve the vision, end state, and goals outlined in the 

strategic policy. 

(B) A comprehensive list of the Department’s 

prepositioned materiel and equipment programs. 

(C) A detailed description of how the plan will be implemented. 

(D) A schedule with milestones for the implementation of 

the plan. 

(E) An assignment of roles and responsibilities for the 

implementation of the plan. 

(F) A description of the resources required to implement 

the plan. 

(G) A description of how the plan will be reviewed and 

assessed to monitor progress. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, 

the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the implementation plan submitted under subsection (b) and the 

prepositioning strategic policy required under section 2229(a) of title 

10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), and submit 

to the congressional defense committees a report describing the findings of such review and including any additional information relating to the propositioning strategic policy and plan that the Comptroller General determines appropriate. 

SEC. 322. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANUFACTURING ARSENAL 

STUDY AND REPORT. 

(a) REVIEW.— 

(1) MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the military services and Defense 

Agencies, shall review— 

(A) current and expected manufacturing requirements 

across the military services and Defense Agencies to identify 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
63 

critical manufacturing competencies and supplies, components, end items, parts, assemblies, and sub-assemblies for 

which there is no or limited domestic commercial source 

and which are appropriate for manufacturing within an 

arsenal owned by the United States in order to support critical manufacturing capabilities; 

(B) how the Department of Defense can more effectively 

use and manage public-private partnerships to preserve 

critical industrial capabilities at such arsenals for future 

national security requirements while providing to the Department of the Army a return on its investment; 

(C) the effectiveness of the strategy of the Department of 

Defense to assign workload to each of the arsenals and the 

potential for alternative strategies that could better identify 

workload for each arsenal; 

(D) the impact of the rate structure driven by the Department of the Army working-capital funds on public-private 

partnerships at each such arsenal; 

(E) the extent to which operations at each such arsenal 

can be streamlined, improved, or enhanced; and 

(F) the effectiveness of the implementation by the Department of the Army of cooperative agreements authorized at 

manufacturing arsenals under section 4544 of title 10, 

United States Code. 

(2) MECHANISMS FOR DETERMINING MANUFACTURING CAPABILITIES.—The Secretary shall review mechanisms within the 

Department of Defense for ensuring that appropriate consideration is given to the unique manufacturing capabilities of arsenals owned by the United States to fulfill manufacturing requirements of the Department of Defense for which there is no 

or limited domestic commercial capability. 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report that includes the results of the reviews conducted under subsection (a) and a description of actions planned to support critical manufacturing capabilities within arsenals owned by the United States. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than one year 

after the date on which the report required under subsection (b) is 

submitted, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an assessment of the 

report together with the recommendations of the Comptroller General to improve the strategy of the Department of Defense to assign 

workload. 

SEC. 323. CONSIDERATION OF ARMY ARSENALS’ CAPABILITIES TO FULFILL MANUFACTURING REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) CONSIDERATION OF CAPABILITY OF ARSENALS.—When undertaking a make-or-buy analysis, a program executive officer or program manager of a military service or Defense Agency shall consider the capability of arsenals owned by the United States to fulfill 

a manufacturing requirement. 

(b) NOTIFICATION OF SOLICITATIONS.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall establish and begin implementation of a system for ensuring 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
64 

that the arsenals owned by the United States are notified of any solicitation that fulfills a manufacturing requirement for which there 

is no or limited domestic commercial source and which may be appropriate for manufacturing within an arsenal owned by the United 

States. 

SEC. 324. STRATEGIC POLICY FOR THE RETROGRADE, RECONSTITUTION, AND REPLACEMENT OF OPERATING FORCES USED 

TO SUPPORT OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF POLICY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a 

policy setting forth the programs and priorities of the Department of Defense for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of units and materiel used to support overseas contingency 

operations. The policy shall take into account national security 

threats, the requirements of the combatant commands, the current readiness of the operating forces of the military departments, and risk associated with strategic depth and the time 

necessary to reestablish required personnel, equipment, and 

training readiness in such operating forces. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The policy required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following elements: 

(A) Establishment and assignment of responsibilities and 

authorities within the Department for oversight and execution of the planning, organization, and management of the 

programs to reestablish the readiness of redeployed operating forces. 

(B) Guidance concerning priorities, goals, objectives, 

timelines, and resources to reestablish the readiness of redeployed operating forces in support of national defense objectives and combatant command requirements. 

(C) Oversight reporting requirements and metrics for the 

evaluation of Department of Defense and military department progress on restoring the readiness of redeployed operating forces in accordance with the policy required under 

paragraph (1). 

(D) A framework for joint departmental reviews of military services’ annual budgets proposed for retrograde, reconstitution, or replacement activities, including an assessment of the strategic and operational risk assumed by the 

proposed levels of investment across the Department of Defense. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a plan for implementation 

of the policy required under this section. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The implementation plan required under 

paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

(A) The assignment of responsibilities and authorities for 

oversight and execution of the planning, organization, and 

management of the programs to reestablish the readiness of 

redeployed operating forces. 

(B) Establishment of priorities, goals, objectives, 

timelines, and resources to reestablish the readiness of reVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
65 

deployed operating forces in support of national defense objectives and combatant command requirements. 

(C) A description of how the plan will be implemented, 

including a schedule with milestones to meet the goals of 

the plan. 

(D) An estimate of the resources by military service and 

by year required to implement the plan, including an assessment of the risks assumed in the plan. 

(3) UPDATES.—Not later than one year after submitting the 

plan required under paragraph (1), and annually thereafter for 

two years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an update on progress toward meeting the goals of the plan. 

(c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than 120 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually after the 

submittal of each update to the implementation plan under subsection (b), the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the implementation plan submitted under subsection (b) and 

the policy required by subsection (a), and submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the findings of such 

review and progress made toward meeting the goals of the plan and 

including any additional information relating to the policy and 

plan that the Comptroller General determines appropriate. 

SEC. 325. LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP STRATEGIC SUSTAINMENT PLAN. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees and to the Comptroller General of 

the United States a strategic sustainment plan for the Littoral Combat Ship. Such plan shall include each of the following: 

(1) An estimate of the cost and schedule of implementing the 

plan. 

(2) An identification of the requirements and planning for the 

long-term sustainment of the Littoral Combat Ship and its mission modules in accordance with section 2366b of title 10, 

United States Code, as amended by section 801 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 

112–81; 125 Stat. 1482). 

(3) A description of the current and future operating environments of the Littoral Combat Ship, as specified or referred to 

in strategic guidance and planning documents of the Department of Defense. 

(4) The facility, supply, and logistics systems requirements, 

including contractor support, of the Littoral Combat Ship when 

forward deployed, and an estimate of the cost and personnel required to conduct the necessary maintenance activities. 

(5) Any required updates to host-nation agreements to facilitate the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship, including a discussion of overseas management of Ship ordnance and hazardous materials and delivery 

of equipment and spare parts needed for emergent repair. 

(6) An evaluation of the forward-deployed maintenance requirements of the Littoral Combat Ship and a schedule of pierside maintenance timelines when forward-deployed, including 

requirements for multiple ships and variants. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
66 

(7) An assessment of the total quantity of equipment, spare 

parts, permanently forward-stationed personnel, and size of fly 

away teams required to support forward-deployed maintenance 

requirements for the U.S.S. Freedom while in Singapore, and 

estimates for follow-on deployments of Littoral Combat Ships of 

both variants. 

(8) A detailed description of the continuity of operations plans 

for the Littoral Combat Ship Squadron and of any plans to increase the number of Squadron personnel. 

(9) An identification of mission critical single point of failure 

equipment for which a sufficient number spare parts are necessary to have on hand, and determination of Littoral Combat 

Ship forward deployed equipment and spare parts locations 

and levels. 

(b) FORM.—The plan required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may have a classified annex. 

SEC. 326. STRATEGY FOR IMPROVING ASSET TRACKING AND IN-TRANSIT VISIBILITY. 

(a) STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility across 

the Department of Defense, together with the plans of the military departments for implementing the strategy. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategy and implementation plans required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: 

(A) The overarching goals and objectives desired from implementation of the strategy. 

(B) A description of steps to achieve those goals and objectives, as well as milestones and performance measures to 

gauge results. 

(C) An estimate of the costs associated with executing the 

plan, and the sources and types of resources and investments, including skills, technology, human capital, information, and other resources, required to meet the goals and 

objectives. 

(D) A description of roles and responsibilities for managing and overseeing the implementation of the strategy, 

including the role of program managers, and the establishment of mechanisms for multiple stakeholders to coordinate 

their efforts throughout implementation and make necessary adjustments to the strategy based on performance. 

(E) A description of key factors external to the Department of Defense and beyond its control that could significantly affect the achievement of the long-term goals contained in the strategy. 

(F) A detailed description of asset marking requirements 

and how automated information and data capture technologies could improve readiness, cost effectiveness, and 

performance. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
67 

(G) A defined list of all categories of items that program 

managers are required to identify for the purposes of asset 

marking. 

(H) A description of steps to improve asset tracking and 

in-transit visibility for classified programs. 

(I) Steps to be undertaken to facilitate collaboration with 

industry designed to capture best practices, lessons learned, 

and any relevant technical matters. 

(J) A description of how improved asset tracking and intransit visibility could enhance audit readiness, reduce 

counterfeit risk, enhance logistical processes, and otherwise 

benefit the Department of Defense. 

(K) An operational security assessment designed to ensure that all Department of Defense assets are appropriately protected during the execution of the strategy and 

implementation plan. 

(b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than one year 

after the strategy is submitted under subsection (a), the Comptroller 

General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of the extent 

to which the strategy and accompanying implementation plans— 

(1) include the elements set forth under subsection (a)(2); 

(2) align to achieve the overarching asset tracking and intransit visibility goals and objectives of the Department of Defense; 

(3) incorporate, as appropriate, industry best practices related 

to automated information and data capture technologies for 

asset tracking and in-transit visibility; 

(4) effectively execute the policies prescribed in Department of 

Defense Instruction 8320.04; and 

(5) have been implemented. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

SEC. 331. ADDITIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 

PERSONNEL AND UNIT READINESS. 

(a) ASSESSMENT OF ASSIGNED MISSIONS AND CONTRACTOR SUP- PORT.—Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The report for a quarter’’ and inserting 

‘‘Each report’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘(e), and (f)’’ and inserting ‘‘(f), (g), (h), (i), 

(j), and (k), and the reports for the second and fourth quarters of a calendar year shall also contain the information 

required by subsection (e)’’; 

(2) in subsection (d)— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘, including the 

extent’’ and all that follows through the period at the 

end and inserting the following: ‘‘, including an assessment of the manning of units (authorized versus assigned numbers of personnel) for units not scheduled 

for deployment and the timing of the arrival of personnel into units preparing for deployments.’’; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
68 

(ii) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘unit’’ before 

‘‘personnel strength’’; 

(B) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: 

‘‘(2) PERSONNEL TURBULENCE.— ‘‘(A) Recruit quality. 

‘‘(B) Personnel assigned to a unit but not trained for the 

level of assigned responsibility or mission. 

‘‘(C) Fitness for deployment. 

‘‘(D) Recruiting and retention status.’’; 

(C) by striking paragraph (3) and redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3); and 

(D) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(C), by striking ‘‘Training commitments’’ and inserting 

‘‘Mission rehearsals’’; 

(3) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g), as subsections (f), (g), and (l), respectively; 

(4) by inserting after subsection (d)(3), as redesignated by 

paragraph (1)(C), the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) LOGISTICS INDICATORS.—The reports for the second and 

fourth quarters of a calendar year shall also include information regarding the active components of the armed forces (and an evaluation of such information) with respect to each of the following logistics indicators:’’; 

(5) in subsection (e), as designated by paragraph (4)— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

(B) in paragraph (1), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(A), by striking subparagraph (E); and 

(C) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated— 

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Maintenance’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Depot maintenance’’; and 

(ii) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following 

new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) Equipment not available due to a lack of supplies or 

parts.’’; and 

(6) by inserting after subsection (g), as redesignated by paragraph (3), the following new subsections: 

‘‘(h) COMBATANT COMMAND ASSIGNED MISSION ASSESSMENTS.— (1) Each report shall also include an assessment by each commander of a geographic or functional combatant command of the 

ability of the command to successfully execute each of the assigned 

missions of the command. Each such assessment for a combatant 

command shall also include a list of the mission essential tasks for 

each assigned mission of the command and an assessment of the 

ability of the command to successfully complete each task within 

prescribed timeframes. 

‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘assigned mission’ 

means any contingency response program plan, theater campaign 

plan, or named operation that is approved and assigned by the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(i) RISK ASSESSMENT OF DEPENDENCE ON CONTRACTOR SUP- PORT.—Each report shall also include an assessment by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the level of risk incurred by using 

contract support in contingency operations as required under DeVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
69 

partment of Defense Instruction 1100.22, ‘Policies and Procedures 

for Determining Workforce Mix’. 

‘‘(j) COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES ASSESSMENT.—(1) Each report 

shall also include an assessment by the Secretary of Defense of the 

military readiness of the combat support agencies, including, for 

each such agency— 

‘‘(A) a determination with respect to the responsiveness and 

readiness of the agency to support operating forces in the event 

of a war or threat to national security, including— 

‘‘(i) a list of mission essential tasks and an assessment of 

the ability of the agency to successfully perform those tasks; 

‘‘(ii) an assessment of how the ability of the agency to accomplish the tasks referred to in subparagraph (A) affects 

the ability of the military departments and the unified and 

geographic combatant commands to execute operations and 

contingency plans by number; 

‘‘(iii) any readiness deficiencies and actions recommended 

to address such deficiencies; and 

‘‘(iv) key indicators and other relevant information related to any deficiency or other problem identified; 

‘‘(B) any recommendations that the Secretary considers appropriate. 

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘combat support agency’ means 

any of the following Defense Agencies: 

‘‘(A) The Defense Information Systems Agency. 

‘‘(B) The Defense Intelligence Agency. 

‘‘(C) The Defense Logistics Agency. 

‘‘(D) The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (but only 

with respect to combat support functions that the agencies perform for the Department of Defense). 

‘‘(E) The Defense Contract Management Agency. 

‘‘(F) The Defense Threat Reduction Agency. 

‘‘(G) The National Reconnaissance Office. 

‘‘(H) The National Security Agency (but only with respect to 

combat support functions that the agencies perform for the Department of Defense) and Central Security Service. 

‘‘(I) Any other Defense Agency designated as a combat support 

agency by the Secretary of Defense. 

‘‘(k) MAJOR EXERCISE ASSESSMENTS.—(1) Each report shall also 

include an after-action assessment of each major exercise by the 

commander of the geographic or functional combatant command 

concerned or the chief of the military service concerned, as appropriate, that includes— 

‘‘(A) a brief description of the exercise; 

‘‘(B) planned training objectives for the exercise; 

‘‘(C) a full summary of cost associated with the exercise, including in-kind and direct contributions to allies and partners; 

and 

‘‘(D) an executive summary of the lessons learned and training objectives met by conducting the exercise. 

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘major exercise’ means a named 

major training event, an integrated or joint exercise, or a unilateral 

major exercise.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
70 

SEC. 332. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON PRIORITIZATION OF 

FUNDS FOR EQUIPMENT READINESS AND STRATEGIC CAPABILITY. 

(a) INCLUSION OF MARINE CORPS IN REQUIREMENTS.—Section 323 

of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2007 (10 U.S.C. 229 note) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting 

the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) the Secretary of the Army to meet the requirements of the 

Army, and the Secretary of the Navy to meet the requirements 

of the Marine Corps, for that fiscal year, in addition to the requirements under paragraph (1), for the reconstitution of equipment and materiel in prepositioned stocks in accordance with 

requirements under the policy or strategy implemented under 

the guidelines in section 2229 of title 10, United States Code.’’; 

and 

(2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph (B): 

‘‘(B) the Army and the Marine Corps for the reconstitution of equipment and materiel in prepositioned stocks.’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL ARMY REPORT AND

GAO REVIEW.—Such section is further amended by striking subsections (c) through (f) and inserting the following new subsection 

(c): 

‘‘(c) CONTINGENCY OPERATION DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘contingency operation’ has the meaning given that term in section 

101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.’’. 

SEC. 333. REVISION TO REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL SUBMISSION OF 

INFORMATION REGARDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 

CAPITAL ASSETS. 

Section 351(a)(1) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 221 

note) is amended by striking ‘‘in excess of $30,000,000’’ and all that 

follows and inserting ‘‘(as computed in fiscal year 2000 constant 

dollars) in excess of $32,000,000 or an estimated total cost for the 

future-years defense program for which the budget is submitted (as 

computed in fiscal year 2000 constant dollars) in excess of 

$378,000,000, for all expenditures, for all increments, regardless of 

the appropriation and fund source, directly related to the assets definition, design, development, deployment, sustainment, and disposal.’’. 

SEC. 334. MODIFICATION OF ANNUAL CORROSION CONTROL AND PREVENTION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

Section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 

2228 note) is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(5)’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) The report required under subparagraph (A) shall— 

‘‘(i) provide a clear linkage between the corrosion control and 

prevention program of the military department and the overarching goals and objectives of the long-term corrosion control 

and prevention strategy developed and implemented by the SecVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
71 

retary of Defense under section 2228(d) of title 10, United States 

Code; and 

‘‘(ii) include performance measures to ensure that the corrosion control and prevention program is achieving the goals and 

objectives described in clause (i).’’. 

Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of 

Authority 

SEC. 341. CERTIFICATION FOR REALIGNMENT OF FORCES AT LAJES 

AIR FORCE BASE, AZORES. 

The Secretary of Defense shall certify to the congressional defense 

committees, prior to taking any action to realign forces at Lajes Air 

Force Base, Azores, that the action is supported by a European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the Secretary of 

Defense on January 25, 2013. The certification shall include a specific assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, in 

support of the United States overseas force posture. 

SEC. 342. LIMITATION ON PERFORMANCE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAMS OUTSIDE THE 

UNITED STATES. 

If, during fiscal year 2014 or 2015, any performance by a flight 

demonstration team under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense that is scheduled for a location within the United States is 

cancelled by reason of budget reductions made pursuant to an order 

for sequestration issued by the President under section 251A of the 

Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, then 

no such flight demonstration team may perform at any location outside the United States during such fiscal year. 

SEC. 343. LIMITATION ON FUNDING FOR UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 

(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the United 

States Special Operations Command National Capital Region 

(USSOCOM–NCR) until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the 

USSOCOM–NCR. 

(b) REPORT ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) 

shall include the following elements: 

(1) A description of the purpose of the USSOCOM-NCR. 

(2) A description of the activities to be performed by the 

USSOCOM–NCR. 

(3) An explanation of the impact of the USSOCOM-NCR on 

existing activities at United States Special Operations Command headquarters. 

(4) A detailed, by fiscal year, breakout of the staffing and 

other costs associated with the USSOCOM-NCR over the futureyears defense program. 

(5) A description of the relationship between the USSOCOMNCR and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
72 

(6) A description of the role of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict in providing oversight of USSOCOM-NCR activities. 

(7) Any other matters the Secretary determines appropriate. 

SEC. 344. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR TRANS REGIONAL WEB INITIATIVE. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the 

funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the Trans Regional Web Initiative. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), of the amounts 

authorized to be appropriated by section 301 for operation and 

maintenance, Defense-wide, not more than $2,000,000 may be obligated or expended for— 

(1) the termination of the Trans Regional Web Initiative as 

managed by Special Operations Command; or 

(2) transitioning appropriate capabilities of such Initiative to 

other agencies. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

SEC. 351. GIFTS MADE FOR THE BENEFIT OF MILITARY MUSICAL 

UNITS. 

Section 974 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) 

and (f), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following: 

‘‘(d) PRIVATE DONATIONS.—(1) The Secretary concerned may accept contributions of money, personal property, or services on the 

condition that such money, property, or services be used for the benefit of a military musical unit under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. 

‘‘(2) Any contribution of money under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the appropriation or account providing the funds for such 

military musical unit. Any amount so credited shall be merged with 

amounts in the appropriation or account to which credited, and 

shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same 

conditions and limitations, as amounts in such appropriation or account. 

‘‘(3) Not later than January 30 of each year, the Secretary concerned shall submit to Congress a report on any contributions of 

money, personal property, and services accepted under paragraph 

(1) during the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which the 

report is submitted.’’. 

SEC. 352. REVISED POLICY ON GROUND COMBAT AND CAMOUFLAGE 

UTILITY UNIFORMS. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the United 

States that the Secretary of Defense shall eliminate the development 

and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms and families of uniforms in order to adopt and field a 

common combat and camouflage utility uniform or family of uniforms for specific combat environments to be used by all members 

of the Armed Forces. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
73 

(b) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection (c), after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of a military department may not adopt any new camouflage pattern design or uniform 

fabric for any combat or camouflage utility uniform or family of 

uniforms for use by an Armed Force, unless— 

(1) the new design or fabric is a combat or camouflage utility 

uniform or family of uniforms that will be adopted by all 

Armed Forces; 

(2) the Secretary adopts a uniform already in use by another 

Armed Force; or 

(3) the Secretary of Defense grants an exception based on 

unique circumstances or operational requirements. 

(c) EXCEPTIONS.—Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed 

as— 

(1) prohibiting the development of combat and camouflage 

utility uniforms and families of uniforms for use by personnel 

assigned to or operating in support of the unified combatant 

command for special operations forces described in section 167 

of title 10, United States Code; 

(2) prohibiting engineering modifications to existing uniforms 

that improve the performance of combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms, including power harnessing or generating textiles, 

fire resistant fabrics, and anti-vector, anti-microbial, and antibacterial treatments; 

(3) prohibiting the Secretary of a military department from 

fielding ancillary uniform items, including headwear, footwear, 

body armor, and any other such items as determined by the 

Secretary; 

(4) prohibiting the Secretary of a military department from 

issuing vehicle crew uniforms; 

(5) prohibiting cosmetic service-specific uniform modifications 

to include insignia, pocket orientation, closure devices, inserts, 

and undergarments; or 

(6) prohibiting the continued fielding or use of pre-existing 

service-specific or operation-specific combat uniforms as long as 

the uniforms continue to meet operational requirements. 

(d) REGISTRATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of a military department shall formally register with the Joint Clothing and Textiles 

Governance Board all uniforms in use by an Armed Force under the 

jurisdiction of the Secretary and all such uniforms planned for use 

by such an Armed Force. 

(e) LIMITATION ON RESTRICTION.—The Secretary of a military department may not prevent the Secretary of another military department from authorizing the use of any combat or camouflage utility 

uniform or family of uniforms. 

(f) GUIDANCE REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to implement this section. 

(2) CONTENT.—At a minimum, the guidance required by 

paragraph (1) shall require the Secretary of each of the military 

departments— 

(A) in cooperation with the commanders of the combatant 

commands, including the unified combatant command for 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
74 

special operations forces, to establish, by not later than 180 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act, joint criteria for combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms, which shall be included in all new requirements documents for such uniforms; 

(B) to continually work together to assess and develop 

new technologies that could be incorporated into future 

combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of 

uniforms to improve war fighter survivability; 

(C) to ensure that new combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms and families of uniforms meet the geographic and 

operational requirements of the commanders of the combatant commands; and 

(D) to ensure that all new combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms and families of uniforms achieve interoperability 

with all components of individual war fighter systems, including body armor, organizational clothing and individual equipment, and other individual protective systems. 

(g) REPEAL OF POLICY.—Section 352 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84, 123 Stat. 

2262; 10 U.S.C. 771 note) is repealed. 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces. 

Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels and in 

annual limitation on certain end strength reductions. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve. 

Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves. 

Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status). 

Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians. 

Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for 

operational support. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 421. Military personnel. 

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

SEC. 401. END STRENGTHS FOR ACTIVE FORCES. 

The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2014, as follows: 

(1) The Army, 520,000. 

(2) The Navy, 323,600. 

(3) The Marine Corps, 190,200. 

(4) The Air Force, 327,600. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
75 

SEC. 402. REVISIONS IN PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH 

MINIMUM LEVELS AND IN ANNUAL LIMITATION ON CERTAIN END STRENGTH REDUCTIONS. 

(a) PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY END STRENGTH MINIMUM LEVELS.—Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new 

paragraphs: 

‘‘(1) For the Army, 510,000. 

‘‘(2) For the Navy, 323,600. 

‘‘(3) For the Marine Corps, 188,000. 

‘‘(4) For the Air Force, 327,600.’’. 

(b) ANNUAL MAXIMUM AUTHORIZED REDUCTION IN END

STRENGTHS.— 

(1) ARMY END STRENGTHS.—Subsection (a) of section 403 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1708) is amended by striking 

‘‘15,000 members’’ and inserting ‘‘25,000 members’’. 

(2) MARINE CORPS END STRENGTHS.—Subsection (b) of such 

section is amended by striking ‘‘5,000 members’’ and inserting 

‘‘7,500 members’’. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

SEC. 411. END STRENGTHS FOR SELECTED RESERVE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for 

Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2014, as follows: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 354,200. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 205,000. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 59,100. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600. 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 105,400. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 70,400. 

(7) The Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000. 

(b) END STRENGTH REDUCTIONS.—The end strengths prescribed 

by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component 

shall be proportionately reduced by— 

(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as 

units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on 

active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal 

year; and 

(2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at 

the end of the fiscal year. 

(c) END STRENGTH INCREASES.—Whenever units or individual 

members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve 

component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized 

strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual 

members. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
76 

SEC. 412. END STRENGTHS FOR RESERVES ON ACTIVE DUTY IN SUPPORT OF THE RESERVES. 

Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve 

components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 

2014, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National 

Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 16,261. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 10,159. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261. 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 14,734. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 2,911. 

SEC. 413. END STRENGTHS FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS (DUAL STATUS). 

The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of 

the last day of fiscal year 2014 for the reserve components of the 

Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, 

United States Code) shall be the following: 

(1) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 

27,210. 

(2) For the Army Reserve, 8,395. 

(3) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 21,875. 

(4) For the Air Force Reserve, 10,429. 

SEC. 414. FISCAL YEAR 2014 LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF NON-DUAL 

STATUS TECHNICIANS. 

(a) LIMITATIONS.— (1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of 

non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as 

of September 30, 2014, may not exceed the following: 

(A) For the Army National Guard of the United States, 

1,600. 

(B) For the Air National Guard of the United States, 350. 

(2) ARMY RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2014, 

may not exceed 595. 

(3) AIR FORCE RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status 

technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 

30, 2014, may not exceed 90. 

(b) NON-DUAL STATUS TECHNICIANS DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘‘non-dual status technician’’ has the meaning given that 

term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 415. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESERVE PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED 

TO BE ON ACTIVE DUTY FOR OPERATIONAL SUPPORT. 

During fiscal year 2014, the maximum number of members of the 

reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any 

time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of 

title 10, United States Code, is the following: 

(1) The Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000. 

(2) The Army Reserve, 13,000. 

(3) The Navy Reserve, 6,200. 

(4) The Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
77 

(5) The Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000. 

(6) The Air Force Reserve, 14,000. 

Subtitle C—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 421. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the 

Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department 

of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401. 

(b) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORIZATION.—The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of 

appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal 

year 2014. 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 

Sec. 501. Congressional notification requirements related to increases in number of 

general and flag officers on active duty or in joint duty assignments. 

Sec. 502. Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education upon original appointment as a commissioned officer. 

Sec. 503. Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and selective early 

removal of officers from reserve active-status list. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

Sec. 511. Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve components. 

Sec. 512. Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active and 

inactive National Guard. 

Sec. 513. Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve component 

units and involuntary mobilizations of certain Reserves. 

Sec. 514. Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component general 

and flag officers in an active status. 

Sec. 515. Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

Sec. 521. Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program about disability-related employment and education protections. 

Sec. 522. Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury before administrative separation. 

Sec. 523. Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators. 

Sec. 524. Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation Plan. 

Sec. 525. Provision of military service records to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

in an electronic format. 

Sec. 526. Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System. 

Subtitle D—Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault Prevention and 

Response and Related Reforms 

Sec. 531. Modification of eligibility for appointment as Judge on the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 532. Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed 

Forces and chaplains of such members. 

Sec. 533. Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance with regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of members of the Armed 

Forces and their chaplains. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
78 

Sec. 534. Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense policy regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious services. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training 

Sec. 541. Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for purposes of certain educational assistance under laws administered by the 

Secretary of Defense. 

Sec. 542. Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for military 

occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian 

certifications and licenses. 

Sec. 543. Report on the Troops to Teachers program. 

Sec. 544. Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation 

of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct student loans of 

certain members of the Armed Forces. 

Subtitle F—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family Readiness Matters 

Sec. 551. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit 

dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees. 

Sec. 552. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities. 

Sec. 553. Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and secondary education component of Department of Defense education program. 

Sec. 554. Family support programs for immediate family members of members of 

the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces. 

Sec. 555. Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the Armed Forces in 

child custody determinations. 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards 

Sec. 561. Repeal of limitation on number of medals of honor that may be awarded 

to the same member of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 562. Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding Medal of 

Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air Force Cross, and 

Distinguished-Service Medal. 

Sec. 563. Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard 

Medal of Honor Roll requirements. 

Sec. 564. Prompt replacement of military decorations. 

Sec. 565. Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to victims of the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, 

Texas. 

Sec. 566. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former members of the 

Armed Forces previously recommended for award of the Medal of 

Honor. 

Sec. 567. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of valor during 

the Vietnam War. 

Sec. 568. Authorization for award of the Distinguished-Service Cross for acts of 

valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars. 

Sec. 569. Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant Alonzo 

H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War. 

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Sec. 571. Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation reports to include 360-degree assessment approach. 

Sec. 572. Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members of 

the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B. 

Sec. 573. Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary 

schools. 

Sec. 574. Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality disorder 

or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members from the Armed 

Forces. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 581. Accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense 

civilian employees listed as missing and related reports. 

Sec. 582. Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing reports of 

certain recovered persons who were never placed in a missing status. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
79 

Sec. 583. Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation of 

North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville State College. 

Sec. 584. Review of security of military installations, including barracks, temporary 

lodging facilities, and multi-family residences. 

Sec. 585. Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military 

Cemeteries. 

Sec. 586. Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members of the 

Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans. 

Sec. 587. Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results. 

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy 

Generally 

SEC. 501. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS RELATED 

TO INCREASES IN NUMBER OF GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS ON ACTIVE DUTY OR IN JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENTS. 

(a) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION REQUIRED; BASELINES.—Section 526 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) through (h) as subsections 

(c) through (g), respectively; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsections: 

‘‘(h) ACTIVE-DUTY BASELINE.— 

‘‘(1) NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENT.—If the Secretary of a 

military department proposes an action that would increase 

above the baseline the number of general officers or flag officers 

of an armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary who 

would be on active duty and would count against the statutory 

limit applicable to that armed force under subsection (a), the 

action shall not take effect until after the end of the 60-calendar 

day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary provides notice of the proposed action, including the rationale for 

the action, to the Committees on Armed Services of the House 

of Representatives and the Senate. 

‘‘(2) BASELINE DEFINED.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the 

term ‘baseline’ for an armed force means the lower of— 

‘‘(A) the statutory limit of general officers or flag officers 

of that armed force under subsection (a); or 

‘‘(B) the actual number of general officers or flag officers 

of that armed force who, as of January 1, 2014, counted toward the statutory limit of general officers or flag officers 

of that armed force under subsection (a). 

‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—If, at any time, the actual number of general officers or flag officers of an armed force who count toward 

the statutory limit of general officers or flag officers of that 

armed force under subsection (a) exceeds such statutory limit, 

then no increase described in paragraph (1) for that armed 

force may occur until the general officer or flag officer total for 

that armed force is reduced below such statutory limit. 

‘‘(i) JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENT BASELINE.— 

‘‘(1) NOTICE AND WAIT REQUIREMENT.—If the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, or the Chairman 

of the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposes an action that would increase above the baseline the number of general officers and 

flag officers of the armed forces in joint duty assignments who 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
80 

count against the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1), the action shall not take effect until after the end of the 60-calendar 

day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary or 

Chairman, as the case may be, provides notice of the proposed 

action, including the rationale for the action, to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate. 

‘‘(2) BASELINE DEFINED.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the 

term ‘baseline’ means the lower of— 

‘‘(A) the statutory limit on general officer and flag officer 

positions that are joint duty assignments under subsection 

(b)(1); or 

‘‘(B) the actual number of general officers and flag officers who, as of January 1, 2014, were in joint duty assignments counted toward the statutory limit under subsection 

(b)(1). 

‘‘(3) LIMITATION.—If, at any time, the actual number of general officers and flag officers in joint duty assignments counted 

toward the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1) exceeds such 

statutory limit, then no increase described in paragraph (1) 

may occur until the number of general officers and flag officers 

in joint duty assignments is reduced below such statutory 

limit.’’. 

(b) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.— (1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than February 1, 2014, the 

Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report 

specifying— 

(A) the numbers of general officers and flag officers who, 

as of January 1, 2014, counted toward the service-specific 

limits of subsection (a) of section 526 of title 10, United 

States Code; and 

(B) the number of general officers and flag officers in 

joint duty assignments who, as of January 1, 2014, counted 

toward the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1) of such 

section. 

(2) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Section 526 of title 10, United States 

Code, is further amended by inserting after subsection (i), as 

added by subsection (a)(2) of this section, the following new 

subsection: 

‘‘(j) ANNUAL REPORT ON GENERAL OFFICER AND FLAG OFFICER

NUMBERS.—Not later than March 1, 2015, and each March 1 thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report specifying— 

‘‘(1) the numbers of general officers and flag officers who, as 

of January 1 of the calendar year in which the report is submitted, counted toward the service-specific limits of subsection 

(a); and 

‘‘(2) the number of general officers and flag officers in joint 

duty assignments who, as of such January 1, counted toward 

the statutory limit under subsection (b)(1).’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this is section 

shall take effect on January 1, 2014. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
81 

SEC. 502. SERVICE CREDIT FOR CYBERSPACE EXPERIENCE OR ADVANCED EDUCATION UPON ORIGINAL APPOINTMENT AS A 

COMMISSIONED OFFICER. 

Section 533 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsections (a)(2) and (c), by inserting ‘‘or (g)’’ after 

‘‘subsection (b)’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g)(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, 

if the Secretary of a military department determines that the number of commissioned officers with cyberspace-related experience or 

advanced education serving on active duty in an armed force under 

the jurisdiction of such Secretary is critically below the number 

needed, such Secretary may credit any person receiving an original 

appointment with a period of constructive service for the following: 

‘‘(A) Special experience or training in a particular cyberspacerelated field if such experience or training is directly related to 

the operational needs of the armed force concerned. 

‘‘(B) Any period of advanced education in a cyberspace-related 

field beyond the baccalaureate degree level if such advanced 

education is directly related to the operational needs of the 

armed force concerned. 

‘‘(2) Constructive service credited an officer under this subsection 

shall not exceed one year for each year of special experience, training, or advanced education, and not more than three years total 

constructive service may be credited. 

‘‘(3) Constructive service credited an officer under this subsection 

is in addition to any service credited that officer under subsection 

(a) and shall be credited at the time of the original appointment of 

the officer. 

‘‘(4) The authority to award constructive service credit under this 

subsection expires on December 31, 2018.’’. 

SEC. 503. SELECTIVE EARLY RETIREMENT AUTHORITY FOR REGULAR 

OFFICERS AND SELECTIVE EARLY REMOVAL OF OFFICERS 

FROM RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST. 

(a) REGULAR OFFICERS ON THE ACTIVE-DUTY LIST CONSIDERED

FOR SELECTIVE EARLY RETIREMENT.— (1) LIEUTENANT COLONELS AND COMMANDERS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 638a(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by striking ‘‘would be subject to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘two or more times)’’ and inserting ‘‘have failed of 

selection for promotion at least one time and whose names are 

not on a list of officers recommended for promotion’’. 

(2) COLONELS AND NAVY CAPTAINS.—Subparagraph (B) of 

such section is amended by striking ‘‘would be subject to’’ and 

all that follows through ‘‘not less than two years)’’ and inserting 

‘‘have served on active duty in that grade for at least two years 

and whose names are not on a list of officers recommended for 

promotion’’. 

(b) OFFICERS CONSIDERED FOR SELECTIVE EARLY REMOVAL FROM

RESERVE ACTIVE-STATUS LIST.—Section 14704 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before ‘‘Whenever’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘all officers on that list’’ and inserting ‘‘officers on the reserve active-status list’’; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
82 

(C) by striking ‘‘the reserve active-status list, in the number specified by the Secretary by each grade and competitive category.’’ and inserting ‘‘that list.’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), the list of officers in a 

reserve component whose names are submitted to a board under 

paragraph (1) shall include each officer on the reserve active-status 

list for that reserve component in the same grade and competitive 

category whose position on the reserve active-status list is between— 

‘‘(A) that of the most junior officer in that grade and competitive category whose name is submitted to the board; and 

‘‘(B) that of the most senior officer in that grade and competitive category whose name is submitted to the board. 

‘‘(3) A list submitted to a board under paragraph (1) may not include an officer who— 

‘‘(A) has been approved for voluntary retirement; or 

‘‘(B) is to be involuntarily retired under any provision of law 

during the fiscal year in which the board is convened or during 

the following fiscal year.’’; 

(2) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) 

and (d), respectively; and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) SPECIFICATION OF NUMBER OF OFFICERS WHO MAY BE RECOMMENDED FOR SEPARATION.—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall specify the number of officers described in subsection (a)(1) that a board may recommend for separation under 

subsection (c).’’. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component 

Management 

SEC. 511. SUICIDE PREVENTION EFFORTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS. 

(a) IMPROVED OUTREACH UNDER SUICIDE PREVENTION AND RESILIENCE PROGRAM.—Section 10219 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): 

‘‘(f) OUTREACH FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS.—(1) Upon the request of an adjutant general of a State, the 

Secretary may share with the adjutant general the contact information of members described in paragraph (2) who reside in such 

State in order for the adjutant general to include such members in 

suicide prevention efforts conducted under this section. 

‘‘(2) Members described in this paragraph are— 

‘‘(A) members of the Individual Ready Reserve; and 

‘‘(B) members of a reserve component who are individual mobilization augmentees.’’. 

(b) INCLUSION IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 706 of the National Defense 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
83 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 1800; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended— 

(1) in subsections (a) and (e), by striking ‘‘and substance use 

disorders and traumatic brain injury’’ and inserting ‘‘, substance use disorders, traumatic brain injury, and suicide prevention’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c)(3), by striking ‘‘and substance use disorders and traumatic brain injury described in paragraph (1)’’ 

and inserting ‘‘, substance use disorders, traumatic brain injury, and suicide prevention’’. 

SEC. 512. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTIONS ON THE TRANSFER OF OFFICERS BETWEEN THE ACTIVE AND INACTIVE NATIONAL 

GUARD. 

(a) ARMY NATIONAL GUARD.—During the period ending on December 31, 2016, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Army: 

(1) An officer of the Army National Guard who fills a vacancy 

in a federally recognized unit of the Army National Guard may 

be transferred from the active Army National Guard to the inactive Army National Guard. 

(2) An officer of the Army National Guard transferred to the 

inactive Army National Guard pursuant to paragraph (1) may 

be transferred from the inactive Army National Guard to the 

active Army National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized unit. 

(b) AIR NATIONAL GUARD.—During the period ending on December 31, 2016, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Air Force: 

(1) An officer of the Air National Guard who fills a vacancy 

in a federally recognized unit of the Air National Guard may 

be transferred from the active Air National Guard to the inactive Air National Guard. 

(2) An officer of the Air National Guard transferred to the inactive Air National Guard pursuant to paragraph (1) may be 

transferred from the inactive Air National Guard to the active 

Air National Guard to fill a vacancy in a federally recognized 

unit. 

SEC. 513. LIMITATIONS ON CANCELLATIONS OF DEPLOYMENT OF CERTAIN RESERVE COMPONENT UNITS AND INVOLUNTARY 

MOBILIZATIONS OF CERTAIN RESERVES. 

(a) LIMITATION ON CANCELLATION OF DEPLOYMENT OF CERTAIN

UNITS WITHIN 180 DAYS OF SCHEDULED DEPLOYMENT.— 

(1) LIMITATION.—The deployment of a unit of a reserve component of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2) may not 

be cancelled during the 180-day period ending on the date on 

which the unit is otherwise scheduled for deployment without 

the approval, in writing, of the Secretary of Defense. 

(2) COVERED DEPLOYMENTS.—A deployment of a unit of a reserve component described in this paragraph is a deployment 

whose cancellation as described in paragraph (1) is due to the 

deployment of a unit of a regular component of the Armed 

Forces to carry out the mission for which the unit of the reserve 

component was otherwise to be deployed. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
84 

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS AND GOVERNORS ON APPROVAL OF

CANCELLATION OF DEPLOYMENT.—On approving the cancellation 

of deployment of a unit under paragraph (1), the Secretary 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the 

Governor concerned a notice on the approval of cancellation of 

deployment of the unit. 

(b) ADVANCE NOTICE TO CERTAIN RESERVES ON INVOLUNTARY

MOBILIZATION.— (1) ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED.—The Secretary concerned 

may not provide less than 120 days advance notice of an involuntary mobilization to a member of the reserve component of 

the Armed Forces described in paragraph (2) without the approval, in writing, of the Secretary of Defense. 

(2) COVERED RESERVES.—A member of a reserve component 

described in this paragraph is a member as follows: 

(A) A member who is not assigned to a unit organized to 

serve as a unit. 

(B) A member who is to be mobilized apart from the 

member’s unit. 

(3) COMMENCEMENT OF APPLICABILITY.—This subsection shall 

apply with respect to members who are mobilized on or after the 

date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(4) SECRETARY CONCERNED DEFINED.—In this subsection, the 

term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code. 

(5) SUNSET.—This subsection shall cease to apply as of the 

date of the completion of the withdrawal of United States combat forces from Afghanistan. 

(c) NONDELEGATION OF APPROVAL.—The Secretary of Defense may 

not delegate the approval of cancellations of deployments of units 

under subsection (a) or the approval of mobilization of Reserves 

without advance notice under subsection (b). 

SEC. 514. REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZATIONS FOR RESERVE COMPONENT GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS IN AN 

ACTIVE STATUS. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 

review of the general officer and flag officer requirements for members of the reserve component in an active status. 

(b) PURPOSE OF REVIEW.—The purpose of the review is to ensure 

that the authorized strengths provided in section 12004 of title 10, 

United States Code, for reserve general officers and reserve flag officers in an active status— 

(1) are based on an objective requirements process and are 

sufficient for the effective management, leadership, and administration of the reserve components; 

(2) provide a qualified, sufficient pool from which reserve 

component general and flag officers can continue to be assigned 

on active duty in joint duty and in-service military positions; 

(3) reflect a review of the appropriateness and number of exemptions provided by subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 

12004 of title 10, United States Code; 

(4) reflect the efficiencies that can be achieved through downgrading or elimination of reserve component general or flag officer positions, including through the conversion of certain reVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00116 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
85 

serve component general or flag officer positions to senior civilian positions; and 

(5) are subjected to periodic review, control, and adjustment. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review, including 

such recommendations for changes in law and policy related to authorized reserve general and flag officers strengths as the Secretary 

considers to be appropriate. 

SEC. 515. FEASIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A UNIT OF THE NATIONAL 

GUARD IN AMERICAN SAMOA AND IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. 

(a) DETERMINATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

determine the feasibility of establishing— 

(1) a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa; and 

(2) a unit of the National Guard in the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands. 

(b) FORCE STRUCTURE ELEMENTS.—In making the feasibility determination under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following: 

(1) The allocation of National Guard force structure and 

manpower to American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands in the event of the establishment of 

a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the 

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the impact of this allocation on existing National Guard units in the 

50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the District of Columbia. 

(2) The Federal funding that would be required to support 

pay, benefits, training operations, and missions of members of 

a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, based on the allocation derived from paragraph (1), and the equipment, including maintenance, required to support such force structure. 

(3) The presence of existing infrastructure to support a unit 

of the National Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the requirement 

for additional infrastructure, including information technology 

infrastructure, to support such force structure, based on the allocation derived from paragraph (1). 

(4) How a unit of the National Guard in American Samoa 

and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Island would 

accommodate the National Guard Bureau’s ‘‘Essential Ten’’ 

homeland defense capabilities (i.e., aviation, engineering, civil 

support teams, security, medical, transportation, maintenance, 

logistics, joint force headquarters, and communications) and reflect regional needs. 

(5) The manpower cadre, both military personnel and fulltime support, including National Guard technicians, required 

to establish, maintain, and sustain a unit of the National 

Guard in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands, and the ability of American Samoa 

and of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
86 

support demographically a unit of the National Guard at each 

location. 

(6) The ability of a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to maintain unit readiness and the logistical challenges 

associated with transportation, communications, supply/resupply, and training operations and missions. 

(c) SUBMISSION OF CONCLUSION.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

notify the congressional defense committees of the results of the feasibility determination made under subsection (a). If the Secretary 

determines that establishment of a unit of the National Guard in 

American Samoa or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

Islands (or both) is feasible, the Secretary shall include in the notification the following: 

(1) A determination of whether the executive branch of American Samoa and of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands has enacted and implemented statutory authorization for an organized militia as a prerequisite for establishing 

a unit of the National Guard, and a description of any other 

steps that such executive branches must take to request and 

carry out the establishment of a National Guard unit. 

(2) A list of any amendments to titles 10, 32, and 37, United 

States Code, that would have to be enacted by Congress to provide for the establishment of a unit of the National Guard in 

American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern 

Mariana Islands. 

(3) A description of any required Department of Defense actions to establish a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

(4) A suggested timeline for completion of the steps and actions described in the preceding paragraphs. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

SEC. 521. PROVISION OF INFORMATION UNDER TRANSITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ABOUT DISABILITY-RELATED EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION PROTECTIONS. 

(a) ADDITIONAL ELEMENT OF PROGRAM.—Section 1144(b) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(9) Provide information about disability-related employment 

and education protections.’’. 

(b) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—The program carried out 

under section 1144 of title 10, United States Code, shall comply 

with the requirements of subsection (b)(9) of such section, as added 

by subsection (a), by not later than April 1, 2015. 

SEC. 522. MEDICAL EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS REGARDING POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER OR TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION. 

Section 1177(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

inserting after ‘‘honorable’’ the following: ‘‘, including an administrative separation in lieu of court-martial,’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
87 

SEC. 523. ESTABLISHMENT AND USE OF CONSISTENT DEFINITION OF 

GENDER-NEUTRAL OCCUPATIONAL STANDARD FOR MILITARY CAREER DESIGNATORS. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF DEFINITIONS.—Section 543 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103– 

160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) GENDER-NEUTRAL OCCUPATIONAL STANDARD.—The term 

‘gender-neutral occupational standard’, with respect to a military career designator, means that all members of the Armed 

Forces serving in or assigned to the military career designator 

must meet the same performance outcome-based standards for 

the successful accomplishment of the necessary and required 

specific tasks associated with the qualifications and duties performed while serving in or assigned to the military career designator. 

‘‘(2) MILITARY CAREER DESIGNATOR.—The term ‘military career designator’ refers to— 

‘‘(A) in the case of enlisted members and warrant officers 

of the Armed Forces, military occupational specialties, specialty codes, enlisted designators, enlisted classification 

codes, additional skill identifiers, and special qualification 

identifiers; and 

‘‘(B) in the case of commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers), officer areas of concentration, 

occupational specialties, specialty codes, additional skill 

identifiers, and special qualification identifiers.’’. 

(b) USE OF DEFINITIONS.—Such section is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 

‘‘military occupational career field’’ and inserting ‘‘military 

career designator’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘common, relevant performance standards’’ and inserting ‘‘an occupational standard’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘any military occupational specialty’’ 

and inserting ‘‘any military career designator’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘requirements for members in that 

specialty and shall ensure (in the case of an occupational specialty’’ and inserting ‘‘requirements as part of 

the gender-neutral occupational standard for members 

in that career designator and shall ensure (in the case 

of a career designator’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘an occupational specialty’’ and inserting ‘‘a military career designator’’; 

(ii) by striking ‘‘that occupational specialty’’ and inserting ‘‘that military career designator’’; and 

(iii) by striking ‘‘that specialty’’ and inserting ‘‘that 

military career designator’’; and 

(3) in subsection (c)— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
88 

(A) by striking ‘‘the occupational standards for a military 

occupational field’’ and inserting ‘‘the gender-neutral occupational standard for a military career designator’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘that occupational field’’ and inserting 

‘‘that military career designator’’. 

SEC. 524. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE WOMEN IN SERVICE 

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretaries of the military departments— 

(1) no later than September 2015, should develop, review, and 

validate individual occupational standards, using validated 

gender-neutral occupational standards, so as to assess and assign members of the Armed Forces to units, including Special 

Operations Forces; and 

(2) no later than January 1, 2016, should complete all assessments. 

SEC. 525. PROVISION OF MILITARY SERVICE RECORDS TO THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS IN AN ELECTRONIC FORMAT. 

(a) PROVISION IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT.—In accordance with subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall make the covered records of each 

member of the Armed Forces available to the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs in an electronic format. 

(b) DEADLINE FOR PROVISION OF RECORDS.—With respect to a 

member of the Armed Forces who is discharged or released from the 

Armed Forces on or after January 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense 

shall ensure that the covered records of the member are made available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs not later than 90 days after 

the date of the member’s discharge or release. 

(c) SHARING OF PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION.—For purposes 

of the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health 

Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 

104–191; 42 U.S.C. 1320d–2 note), making medical records available to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subsection (a) shall 

be treated as a permitted disclosure. 

(d) RECORDS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO SECRETARY OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation with 

the Secretary of Defense, shall ensure that the covered records of 

members of the Armed Forces that are available to the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs as of the date of the enactment of this Act are made 

electronically accessible and available as soon as practicable after 

that date to the Veterans Benefits Administration. 

(e) COVERED RECORDS DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered records’’ means, with respect to a member of the Armed 

Forces— 

(1) service treatment records; 

(2) accompanying personal records; 

(3) relevant unit records; and 

(4) medical records created by reason of treatment or services 

received pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
89 

SEC. 526. REVIEW OF INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM. 

(a) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall conduct a review of— 

(1) the backlog of pending cases in the Integrated Disability 

Evaluation System with respect to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces for the purpose of addressing the 

matters specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (b); and 

(2) the improvements to the Integrated Disability Evaluation 

System specified in paragraph (2) of such subsection. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the House of 

Representatives and the Senate a report on the review conducted 

under subsection (a). Such report shall include the following: 

(1) With respect to the reserve components of the Armed 

Forces— 

(A) the number of pending cases that exist as of the date 

of the report, listed by military department, component, 

and, with respect to the National Guard, State; 

(B) as of the date of the report, the average time it takes 

the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans 

Affairs to process a case through each phase or step of the 

Integrated Disability Evaluation System under that Department’s control; 

(C) a description of the measures the Secretary has taken, 

and will take, to resolve the backlog of cases in the Integrated Disability Evaluation System; and 

(D) the date by which the Secretary plans to resolve such 

backlog for each military department. 

(2) With respect to the regular components and reserve components of the Armed Forces— 

(A) a description of the progress being made by both the 

Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to transition the Integrated Disability Evaluation System to an integrated and readily accessible electronic format that a member of the Armed Forces may access to see 

the status of the member during each phase or step of the 

system; 

(B) an estimate of the cost to complete the transition to 

an integrated and readily accessible electronic format; and 

(C) an assessment of the feasibility of improving in-transit visibility of pending cases, including by establishing a 

method of tracking a pending case when— 

(i) a military treatment facility is assigned a packet 

and pending case for action regarding a member; and 

(ii) a packet is at the Veterans Tracking Application 

and Disability Rating Activity Site of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

(c) PENDING CASE DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘pending 

case’’ means a case involving a member of the Armed Forces who, 

as of the date of the review under subsection (a), is within the Integrated Disability Evaluation System and has been referred to a 

medical evaluation board. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
90 

Subtitle D—Military Justice Matters, Other 

Than Sexual Assault Prevention and Response and Related Reforms 

SEC. 531. MODIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR APPOINTMENT AS 

JUDGE ON THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) MODIFICATION.—Paragraph (4) of section 942(b) of title 10, 

United States Code (article 142(b) of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice), is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(4) A person may not be appointed as a judge of the court within 

seven years after retirement from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall 

apply with respect to appointments to the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Armed Forces that occur on or after that date. 

SEC. 532. ENHANCEMENT OF PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE 

OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND CHAPLAINS OF 

SUCH MEMBERS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 533 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘The Armed Forces shall accommodate the beliefs’’ and inserting ‘‘Unless it could have an adverse impact on 

military readiness, unit cohesion, and good order and discipline, the Armed Forces shall accommodate individual expressions of belief’’; 

(2) by inserting ‘‘sincerely held’’ before ‘‘conscience’’; and 

(3) by striking ‘‘use such beliefs’’ and inserting ‘‘use such expression of belief’’. 

(b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the 

implementing regulations required by subsection (c) of such section. 

In prescribing such regulations, the Secretary shall consult with the 

official military faith-group representatives who endorse military 

chaplains. 

SEC. 533. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ARMED FORCES 

COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS FOR THE PROTECTION 

OF RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES AND THEIR CHAPLAINS. 

(a) INVESTIGATION INTO COMPLIANCE; REPORT.—Not later than 

18 months after the date on which regulations are issued implementing the protections afforded by section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 

126 Stat. 1727; 10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note), as amended by section 

532, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report— 

(1) setting forth the results of an investigation by the Inspector General during that 18-month period into the compliance by 

the Armed Forces with the elements of such regulations on adverse personnel actions, discrimination, or denials of promotion, 

schooling, training, or assignment for members of the Armed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
91 

Forces based on conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs; and 

(2) identifying the number of times during the investigation 

period that the Inspector General of the Department of Defense 

or the Inspector General of a military department was contacted 

regarding an incident involving the conscience, moral principles, or religious beliefs of a member of the Armed Forces. 

(b) CONSULTATION.—In conducting any analysis, investigation, or 

survey for purposes of this section, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall consult with the Armed Forces Chaplains 

Board, as appropriate. 

SEC. 534. SURVEY OF MILITARY CHAPLAINS VIEWS ON DEPARTMENT 

OF DEFENSE POLICY REGARDING CHAPLAIN PRAYERS 

OUTSIDE OF RELIGIOUS SERVICES. 

(a) SURVEY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 

survey among a statistically valid sample of military chaplains of 

the regular and reserve components of the Armed Forces, to be selected at random, to assess whether— 

(1) restrictions placed on prayers offered in a public or nonreligious setting have prevented military chaplains from exercising the tenets of their faith as prescribed by their endorsing 

faith group; and 

(2) those restrictions have had an adverse impact on the ability of military chaplains to fulfill their duties to minister to 

members of the Armed Forces and their dependents. 

(b) DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

complete the survey required by subsection (a) within one year after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(c) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 90 days after completing the survey required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing— 

(1) the survey questionnaire; and 

(2) the results of the survey. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and 

Training 

SEC. 541. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY 

THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by inserting after section 2006 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2006a. Assistance for education and training: availability 

of certain assistance for use only for certain programs of education 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Effective as of August, 1, 2014, an individual 

eligible for assistance under a Department of Defense educational 

assistance program or authority covered by this section may, except 

as provided in subsection (b), only use such assistance for educational expenses incurred for a program as follows: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
92 

‘‘(1) An eligible program (as defined in section 481 of the 

Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088)) that is offered 

by an institution of higher education that has entered into, and 

is complying with, a program participation agreement under 

section 487 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1094). 

‘‘(2) In the case of a program designed to prepare individuals 

for licensure or certification in any State, if the program meets 

the instructional curriculum licensure or certification requirements of such State. 

‘‘(3) In the case of a program designed to prepare individuals 

for employment pursuant to standards developed by a State 

board or agency in an occupation that requires approval or licensure for such employment, if the program is approved or licensed by such State board or agency. 

‘‘(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may, by regulation, authorize the use of educational assistance under a Department of Defense educational assistance program or authority covered by this 

chapter for educational expenses incurred for a program of education that is not described in subsection (a) if the program— 

‘‘(1) is accredited and approved by a nationally or regionally 

recognized accrediting agency or association recognized by the 

Department of Education; 

‘‘(2) was not an eligible program described in subsection (a) 

at any time during the most recent two-year period; 

‘‘(3) is a program that the Secretary determines would further 

the purposes of the educational assistance programs or authorities covered by this chapter, or would further the education interests of students eligible for assistance under the such programs or authorities; and 

‘‘(4) the institution providing the program does not provide 

any commission, bonus, or other incentive payment based directly or indirectly on success in securing enrollments or financial aid to any persons or entities engaged in any student recruiting or admission activities or in making decisions regarding the award of student financial assistance, except for the recruitment of foreign students residing in foreign countries who 

are not eligible to receive Federal student assistance. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘Department of Defense educational assistance 

programs and authorities covered by this section’ means the 

programs and authorities as follows: 

‘‘(A) The programs to assist military spouses in achieving 

education and training to expand employment and portable 

career opportunities under section 1784a of this title. 

‘‘(B) The authority to pay tuition for off-duty training or 

education of members of the armed forces under section 

2007 of this title. 

‘‘(C) The program of educational assistance for members 

of the Selected Reserve under chapter 1606 of this title. 

‘‘(D) The program of educational assistance for reserve 

component members supporting contingency operations and 

certain other operations under chapter 1607 of this title. 

‘‘(E) Any other program or authority of the Department of 

Defense for assistance in education or training carried out 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
93 

under the laws administered by the Secretary of Defense 

that is designated by the Secretary, by regulation, for purposes of this section. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘institution of higher education’ has the meaning given that term in section 102 of the Higher Education Act 

for 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of chapter 101 of such title is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 2006 the following new item: 

‘‘2006a. Assistance for education and training: availability of certain assistance for 

use only for certain programs of education.’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall 

take effect on August 1, 2014. 

SEC. 542. ENHANCEMENT OF MECHANISMS TO CORRELATE SKILLS 

AND TRAINING FOR MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES WITH SKILLS AND TRAINING REQUIRED FOR CIVILIAN CERTIFICATIONS AND LICENSES. 

(a) IMPROVEMENT OF INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS OF

THE ARMED FORCES ABOUT CORRELATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military departments, 

in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make information on civilian credentialing opportunities available to members of the Armed Forces beginning with, 

and at every stage of, training of members for military occupational specialties, in order to permit members— 

(A) to evaluate the extent to which such training correlates with the skills and training required in connection 

with various civilian certifications and licenses; and 

(B) to assess the suitability of such training for obtaining 

or pursuing such civilian certifications and licenses. 

(2) COORDINATION WITH TRANSITION GOALS PLANS SUCCESS

PROGRAM.—Information shall be made available under paragraph (1) in a manner consistent with the Transition Goals 

Plans Success (GPS) program. 

(3) TYPES OF INFORMATION.—The information made available 

under paragraph (1) shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 

(A) Information on the civilian occupational equivalents 

of military occupational specialties (MOS). 

(B) Information on civilian license or certification requirements, including examination requirements. 

(C) Information on the availability and opportunities for 

use of educational benefits available to members of the 

Armed Forces, as appropriate, corresponding training, or 

continuing education that leads to a certification exam in 

order to provide a pathway to credentialing opportunities. 

(4) USE AND ADAPTATION OF CERTAIN PROGRAMS.—In making 

information available under paragraph (1), the Secretaries of 

the military departments may use and adapt appropriate portions of the Credentialing Opportunities On-Line (COOL) programs of the Army and the Navy and the Credentialing and 

Educational Research Tool (CERT) of the Air Force. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
94 

(b) IMPROVEMENT OF ACCESS OF ACCREDITED CIVILIAN

CREDENTIALING AND RELATED ENTITIES TO MILITARY TRAINING

CONTENT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of the military departments, 

in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall, to the maximum extent practicable 

consistent with national security and privacy requirements, 

make available to entities specified in paragraph (2), upon request of such entities, information such as military course 

training curricula, syllabi, and materials, levels of military advancement attained, and professional skills developed. 

(2) ENTITIES.—The entities specified in this paragraph are 

the following: 

(A) Civilian credentialing agencies. 

(B) Entities approved by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or by State approving agencies, for purposes of the 

use of educational assistance benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

(3) CENTRAL REPOSITORY.—The actions taken pursuant to 

paragraph (1) may include the establishment of a central repository of information on training and training materials provided members in connection with military occupational specialities that is readily accessible by entities specified in paragraph (2) in order to meet requests described in paragraph (1). 

SEC. 543. REPORT ON THE TROOPS TO TEACHERS PROGRAM. 

Not later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives a report on the Troops to Teachers program that includes each of the following: 

(1) An evaluation of whether there is a need to broaden eligibility to allow service members and veterans without a bachelor’s degree admission into the program and whether the program can be strengthened. 

(2) An evaluation of whether a pilot program should be established to demonstrate the potential benefit of an institutionalbased award for troops to teachers, as long as any such pilot 

program maximizes benefits to service members and minimizes 

administrative and other overhead costs at the participating 

academic institutions. 

SEC. 544. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF REQUIRING AUTOMATIC OPERATION OF CURRENT PROHIBITION ON ACCRUAL OF INTEREST ON DIRECT STUDENT 

LOANS OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with relevant Federal agencies, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of 

the House of Representatives and the Senate a report addressing— 

(1) the feasibility of automatic application of the benefits provided under section 455(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

(20 U.S.C. 1087e(o)) for members of the Armed Forces eligible 

for the benefits; and 

(2) if the Secretary determines automatic application of such 

benefits is feasible, how the Department of Defense would implement the automatic operation of the current prohibition on 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
95 

the accrual of interest on direct student loans of certain members, including the Federal agencies with which the Department 

of Defense would coordinate. 

Subtitle F—Defense Dependents’ Education 

and Military Family Readiness Matters 

SEC. 551. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITY TO ASSIST LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES THAT BENEFIT DEPENDENTS OF 

MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES. 

(a) ASSISTANCE TO SCHOOLS WITH SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS OF

MILITARY DEPENDENT STUDENTS.—Of the amount authorized to be 

appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 301 and available for 

operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified 

in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000 shall be available 

only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational 

agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 

U.S.C. 7703b). 

(b) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘‘local educational agency’’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)). 

SEC. 552. IMPACT AID FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES. 

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 

pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in 

section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 

114 Stat. 1654A–77; 20 U.S.C. 7703a). 

SEC. 553. TREATMENT OF TUITION PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR VIRTUAL 

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COMPONENT 

OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM. 

(a) CREDITING OF PAYMENTS.—Section 2164(l) of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

paragraph: 

‘‘(3) Any payments received by the Secretary of Defense under this 

subsection shall be credited to the account designated by the Secretary for the operation of the virtual educational program under 

this subsection. Payments so credited shall be merged with other 

funds in the account and shall be available, to the extent provided 

in advance in appropriation Acts, for the same purposes and the 

same period as other funds in the account.’’. 

(b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply only with respect to tuition payments received 

under section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, for enrollments 

authorized by such section, after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, in the virtual elementary and secondary education program of 

the Department of Defense education program. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
96 

SEC. 554. FAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBERS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ASSIGNED TO 

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAMS AUTHORIZED.—Consistent with such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe to carry out this section, the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command may conduct up to three pilot programs to assess the feasibility and benefits of providing family support activities for the immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned 

to special operations forces. In selecting and conducting any pilot 

program under this subsection, the Commander shall coordinate 

with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. 

(b) SELECTION OF PROGRAMS.—In selecting the pilot programs to 

be conducted under subsection (a), the Commander shall— 

(1) identify family support activities that have a direct and 

concrete impact on the readiness of special operations forces, 

but that are not being provided by the Secretary of a military 

department to the immediate family members of members of the 

Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces; and 

(2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis of each family support activity proposed to be included in a pilot program. 

(c) EVALUATION.—The Commander shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the success of each family support activity included in a pilot program under subsection (a). 

(d) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The Commander may expend up to 

$5,000,000 during each fiscal year specified in subsection (f) to 

carry out the pilot programs under subsection (a). 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘Commander’’ means the Commander of the 

United States Special Operations Command. 

(2) The term ‘‘immediate family members’’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 1789(c) of title 10, United States 

Code. 

(3) The term ‘‘special operations forces’’ means those forces of 

the Armed Forces identified as special operations forces under 

section 167(i) of such title. 

(f) DURATION OF PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORITY.—The authority provided by subsection (a) is available to the Commander during fiscal 

years 2014 through 2016. 

(g) REPORT REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after completing a 

pilot program under subsection (a), the Commander shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing 

the results of the pilot program. The Commander shall prepare 

the report in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Personnel and Readiness. 

(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report shall include the following: 

(A) A description of the pilot program to address family 

support requirements not being provided by the Secretary of 

a military department to immediate family members of 

members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations 

forces. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
97 

(B) An assessment of the impact of the pilot program on 

the readiness of members of the Armed Forces assigned to 

special operations forces. 

(C) A comparison of the pilot program to other programs 

conducted by the Secretaries of the military departments to 

provide family support to immediate family members of 

members of the Armed Forces. 

(D) Recommendations for incorporating the lessons 

learned from the pilot program into family support programs conducted by the Secretaries of the military departments. 

(E) Any other matters considered appropriate by the 

Commander or the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. 

SEC. 555. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON PARENTAL RIGHTS OF MEMBERS 

OF THE ARMED FORCES IN CHILD CUSTODY DETERMINATIONS. 

It is the sense of Congress that State courts should not consider 

a military deployment, including past, present, or future deployment, as the sole factor in determining child custody in a State 

court proceeding involving a parent who is a member of the Armed 

Forces. The best interest of the child should always prevail in custody cases, but members of the Armed Forces should not lose custody of their children based solely upon service in the Armed Forces 

in defense of the United States. 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards 

SEC. 561. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF MEDALS OF HONOR 

THAT MAY BE AWARDED TO THE SAME MEMBER OF THE 

ARMED FORCES. 

(a) ARMY.—Section 3744(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by striking ‘‘medal of honor, distinguished-service cross,’’ 

and inserting ‘‘distinguished-service cross’’. 

(b) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.—Section 6247 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘medal of honor,’’. 

(c) AIR FORCE.—Section 8744(a) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by striking ‘‘medal of honor, Air Force cross,’’ and inserting ‘‘Air Force Cross’’. 

SEC. 562. STANDARDIZATION OF TIME-LIMITS FOR RECOMMENDING 

AND AWARDING MEDAL OF HONOR, DISTINGUISHEDSERVICE CROSS, NAVY CROSS, AIR FORCE CROSS, AND 

DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE MEDAL. 

(a) ARMY.—Section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘three years’’ and inserting ‘‘five years’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘two years’’ and inserting ‘‘three years’’; and 

(2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘two years’’ and inserting 

‘‘three years’’. 

(b) AIR FORCE.—Section 8744 of such title is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
98 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘three years’’ and inserting ‘‘five years’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘two years’’ and inserting ‘‘three years’’; and 

(2) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘two years’’ and inserting 

‘‘three years’’. 

SEC. 563. RECODIFICATION AND REVISION OF ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, 

AND COAST GUARD MEDAL OF HONOR ROLL REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT AND FURNISHING OF CERTIFICATE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 1134 the following new 

section: 

‘‘§ 1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 

Guard Medal of Honor Roll 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There shall be in the Department of the 

Army, the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Air Force, 

and the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating a roll 

designated as the ‘Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal 

of Honor Roll’. 

‘‘(b) ENROLLMENT.—The Secretary concerned shall enter and 

record on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of 

Honor Roll the name of each person who has served on active duty 

in the armed forces and who has been awarded a medal of honor 

pursuant to section 3741, 6241, or 8741 of this title or section 491 

of title 14. 

‘‘(c) ISSUANCE OF ENROLLMENT CERTIFICATE.—Each living person 

whose name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 

Guard Medal of Honor Roll shall be issued a certificate of enrollment on the roll. 

‘‘(d) ENTITLEMENT TO SPECIAL PENSION; NOTICE TO SECRETARY

OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.—The Secretary concerned shall deliver to 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs a certified copy of each certificate 

of enrollment issued under subsection (c). The copy of the certificate 

shall authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to pay the special 

pension provided by section 1562 of title 38 to the person named in 

the certificate.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 1134 the following new item: 

‘‘1134a. Medal of honor: Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of Honor 

Roll.’’. 

(b) SPECIAL PENSION.— 

(1) AUTOMATIC ENTITLEMENT.—Subsection (a) of section 1562 

of title 38, United States Code, is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘each person’’ and inserting ‘‘each living 

person’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘Honor roll’’ and inserting ‘‘Honor Roll’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘subsection (c) of section 1561 of this title’’ 

and inserting ‘‘subsection (d) of section 1134a of title 10’’; 

and 

(D) by striking ‘‘date of application therefor under section 

1560 of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘date on which the person’s 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
99 

name is entered on the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 

Guard Medal of Honor Roll under subsection (b) of such 

section’’. 

(2) ELECTION TO DECLINE SPECIAL PENSION.—Such section is 

further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g)(1) A person who is entitled to special pension under subsection (a) may elect not to receive special pension by notifying the 

Secretary of such election in writing. 

‘‘(2) Upon receipt of an election made by a person under paragraph (1) not to receive special pension, the Secretary shall cease 

payments of special pension to the person.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— (1) REPEAL OF RECODIFIED PROVISIONS.—Sections 1560 and 

1561 of title 38, United States Code, are repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by striking the 

items relating to sections 1560 and 1561. 

(d) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by 

this section shall apply with respect to Medals of Honor awarded 

on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 564. PROMPT REPLACEMENT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS. 

Section 1135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) PROMPT REPLACEMENT REQUIRED.—When a request for the 

replacement of a military decoration is received under this section 

or section 3747, 3751, 6253, 8747, or 8751 of this title, the Secretary 

concerned shall ensure that— 

‘‘(1) all actions to be taken with respect to the request, including verification of the service record of the recipient of the military decoration, are completed within one year; and 

‘‘(2) the replacement military decoration is mailed to the person requesting the replacement military decoration within 90 

days after verification of the service record.’’. 

SEC. 565. REVIEW OF ELIGIBILITY FOR, AND AWARD OF, PURPLE 

HEART TO VICTIMS OF THE ATTACKS AT RECRUITING STATION IN LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AND AT FORT HOOD, 

TEXAS. 

(a) REVIEW REGARDING SPECIFIED ATTACKS.— 

(1) REVIEW AND AWARD REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall— 

(A) review the circumstances of the attacks that occurred 

at the recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 

1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, in 

which members of the Armed Forces were killed and 

wounded; and 

(B) award the Purple Heart to each member determined 

pursuant to such review to be eligible for the award of the 

Purple Heart in connection with the death or wounding of 

the member in the attacks. 

(2) CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN EVIDENCE.—In reviewing all 

the evidence related to the incidents described in paragraph (1) 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
100 

and the criteria established under Executive Order 11016 (Authorizing the Award of the Purple Heart), the Secretary of the 

military department concerned shall specifically, but not exclusively, assess whether the members of the Armed Forces killed 

or wounded at Fort Hood and Little Rock qualify for award of 

the Purple Heart under the criteria as members of the Armed 

Forces who were killed or wounded as a result of an act of an 

enemy of the United States. 

(3) SUBMISSION.—The results of the review shall be provided 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives within 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act. 

(4) EXCEPTION.—A Purple Heart may not be awarded pursuant to paragraph (1)(B) to a member of the Armed Forces whose 

death or wound in an attack described in paragraph (1)(A) was 

the result of the willful misconduct of the member. 

(b) REVIEW OF THE CRITERIA FOR AWARDING PURPLE HEART.— 

(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the criteria used to determine the eligibility of 

members of the Armed Forces for the award of the Purple 

Heart. The review shall include the policies and procedures for 

determining eligibility for the award of the Purple Heart to 

members who sustain injuries through acts of violence. The purpose of the review is to determine whether those criteria remain 

relevant for the broad range of circumstances in and outside the 

United States in which members are killed or wounded. 

(2) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives a report containing the results 

of the review. The report shall include the findings of the review 

and any recommendations the Secretary considers appropriate 

regarding modifying the criteria for eligibility for the Purple 

Heart. 

SEC. 566. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO 

FORMER MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES PREVIOUSLY 

RECOMMENDED FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR. 

Section 552(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 10 U.S.C. 3741 note) is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘HONOR.—’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) In addition to the authority provided by paragraph (1), a 

Medal of Honor may be awarded to a veteran of the Armed Forces 

who, although not a Jewish-American war veteran or HispanicAmerican war veteran described in subsection (b), was identified 

during the review of service records conducted under subsection (a) 

and regarding whom the Secretary of Defense submitted, before 

January 1, 2014, a recommendation to the President that the President award the Medal of Honor to that veteran.’’. 

SEC. 567. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR FOR 

ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE VIETNAM WAR. 

(a) SERGEANT FIRST CLASS BENNIE G. ADKINS.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
101 

(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time 

limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States 

Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding 

of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, 

the President may award the Medal of Honor under section 

3741 of such title to Bennie G. Adkins of the United States 

Army for the acts of valor during the Vietnam War described 

in paragraph (2). 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to 

in paragraph (1) are the actions of then Sergeant First Class 

Bennie G. Adkins of the United States Army serving with Special Forces Detachment A–102 from March 9 to 12, 1966, during the Vietnam War for which he was originally awarded the 

Distinguished-Service Cross. 

(b) SPECIALIST FOUR DONALD P. SLOAT.— 

(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time 

limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States 

Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding 

of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, 

the President may award the Medal of Honor under section 

3741 of such title to Donald P. Sloat of the United States Army 

for the acts of valor during the Vietnam War described in paragraph (2). 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to 

in paragraph (1) are the actions of then Specialist Four Donald 

P. Sloat of the United States Army serving with 3rd Platoon, 

Delta Company, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th Light Infantry Brigade, Americal Division on January 17, 1970, during the 

Vietnam War. 

SEC. 568. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE DISTINGUISHED-SERVICE CROSS FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING THE KOREAN 

AND VIETNAM WARS. 

(a) SERGEANT FIRST CLASS ROBERT F. KEISER.— (1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time 

limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States 

Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding 

of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, 

the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished-Service 

Cross under section 3742 of such title to Sergeant First Class 

Robert F. Keiser for the acts of valor described in paragraph (2) 

during the Korean War. 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to 

in paragraph (1) are the actions of Robert F. Keiser’s on November 30, 1950, as a member of the 2d Military Police Company, 

2d Infantry Division, United States Army, during the Division’s 

successful withdrawal from the Kunuri-Sunchon Pass. 

(b) SERGEANT FIRST CLASS PATRICK N. WATKINS, JR..— 

(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time 

limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States 

Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding 

of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, 

the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished Service 

Cross under section 3742 of that title to Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., 

for the acts of valor described in paragraph (2). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
102 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to 

in paragraph (1) are the actions of Sergeant First Class Patrick 

N. Watkins, Jr., from August 22 to August 23, 1968, as a member of the United States Army serving in the grade of Sergeant 

First Class in the Republic of Vietnam while serving with 

Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 5th Special Forces 

Group (Airborne), 1st Special Forces Regiment. 

(c) SPECIALIST FOUR ROBERT L. TOWLES.— 

(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time 

limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States 

Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding 

of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, 

the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished Service 

Cross under section 3742 of that title to Robert L. Towles for 

the acts of valor described in paragraph (2). 

(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to 

in paragraph (1) are the actions of Specialist Four Robert L. 

Towles, on November 17, 1965, as a member of the United 

States Army serving in the grade of Specialist Four during the 

Vietnam War while serving in Company D, 2d Battalion, 7th 

Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division, for which he was originally 

awarded the Bronze Star with ‘‘V’’ Device. 

SEC. 569. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF HONOR TO 

FIRST LIEUTENANT ALONZO H. CUSHING FOR ACTS OF 

VALOR DURING THE CIVIL WAR. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other 

time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to 

persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award 

the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to then First 

Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for conspicuous acts of gallantry and 

intrepidity at the risk of life and beyond the call of duty in the Civil 

War, as described in subsection (b). 

(b) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to in 

subsection (a) are the actions of then First Lieutenant Alonzo H. 

Cushing while in command of Battery A, 4th United States Artillery, Army of the Potomac, at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on July 3, 

1863, during the Civil War. 

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, 

Policies, and Reports 

SEC. 571. REPORT ON FEASIBILITY OF EXPANDING PERFORMANCE 

EVALUATION REPORTS TO INCLUDE 360-DEGREE ASSESSMENT APPROACH. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of an assessment of the feasibility of including a 360-degree assessment approach, modeled after the current Department of the Army Multi-Source Assessment and Feedback (MSAF) Program, as part of performance evaluation reports. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
103 

SEC. 572. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL POLICIES REGARDING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WITH 

HIV OR HEPATITIS B. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members of the Armed Forces infected with human immunodeficiency 

virus (HIV) or Hepatitis B. The report shall include the following: 

(1) A description of policies addressing the enlistment or commissioning of individuals with these conditions and retention 

policies, deployment policies, discharge policies, and disciplinary policies regarding individuals with these conditions. 

(2) An assessment of these policies, including an assessment 

of whether the policies reflect an evidence-based, medically accurate understanding of how these conditions are contracted, 

how these conditions can be transmitted to other individuals, 

and the risk of transmission. 

SEC. 573. POLICY ON MILITARY RECRUITMENT AND ENLISTMENT OF 

GRADUATES OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS. 

(a) CONDITIONS ON USE OF TEST, ASSESSMENT, OR SCREENING

TOOLS.—In the case of any test, assessment, or screening tool utilized under the policy on recruitment and enlistment required by 

subsection (b) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1403; 10 

U.S.C. 503 note) for the purpose of identifying persons for recruitment and enlistment in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense 

shall— 

(1) implement a means for ensuring that graduates of a secondary school (as defined in section 9101(38) of the Elementary 

and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection (a)(2) of section 532 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, 

are required to meet the same standard on the test, assessment, 

or screening tool; and 

(2) use uniform testing requirements and grading standards. 

(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in section 532(b) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 or this section shall be construed to permit the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department to create or use a different grading 

standard on any test, assessment, or screening tool utilized for the 

purpose of identifying graduates of a secondary school (as defined 

in section 9101(38) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801(38)), including all persons described in subsection (a)(2) of section 532 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012, for recruitment and enlistment in the 

Armed Forces. 

SEC. 574. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON USE OF DETERMINATION OF PERSONALITY DISORDER OR ADJUSTMENT DISORDER AS BASIS TO SEPARATE MEMBERS FROM THE 

ARMED FORCES. 

Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report evaluating— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
104 

(1) the use by the Secretaries of the military departments, 

since January 1, 2007, of the authority to separate members of 

the Armed Forces from the Armed Forces due of unfitness for 

duty because of a mental condition not amounting to disability, 

including separation on the basis of a personality disorder or 

adjustment disorder and the total number of members separated on such basis; 

(2) the extent to which the Secretaries failed to comply with 

regulatory requirements in separating members of the Armed 

Forces on the basis of a personality or adjustment disorder; and 

(3) the impact of such a separation on the ability of veterans 

so separated to access service-connected disability compensation, disability severance pay, and disability retirement pay. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

SEC. 581. ACCOUNTING FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES LISTED 

AS MISSING AND RELATED REPORTS. 

(a) SYSTEM FOR ACCOUNTING FOR MISSING PERSONS.—Section 

1501(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and 

inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) the dissemination of appropriate information on the status of missing persons to authorized family members.’’. 

(b) REPORT ON ACCOUNTING FOR POW/MIAS.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on 

accounting for missing persons from covered conflicts. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) The total number of missing persons in all covered 

conflicts and in each covered conflict. 

(B) The total number of missing persons in all covered 

conflicts, and in each covered conflict, that are considered 

unrecoverable, including— 

(i) the total number in each conflict that are considered unrecoverable by being lost at sea or in inaccessible terrain; 

(ii) the total number from the Korean War that are 

considered to be located in each of China, North Korea, 

and Russia. 

(C) The total number of missing persons in all covered 

conflicts, and in each covered conflict, that were interred 

without identification, including the locations of interment. 

(D) The number of remains in the custody of the Department of Defense that are awaiting identification, and the 

number of such remains estimated by the Department to be 

likely to be identified using current technology. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
105 

(E) The total number of identifications of remains that 

have been made since January 1, 1970, for all covered conflicts and for each covered conflict. 

(F) The number of instances where next of kin have refused to provide a DNA sample for the identification of recovered remains, for each covered conflict. 

(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

(A) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 

means— 

(i) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and 

(ii) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the 

House of Representatives. 

(B) The term ‘‘covered conflicts’’ means the conflicts specified in or designated under section 1509(a) of title 10, 

United States Code, as of the date of the report required by 

paragraph (1). 

(C) The term ‘‘missing persons’’ has the meaning given 

that term in section 1513(1) of such title. 

(c) REPORT ON POW/MIA ACCOUNTING COMMUNITY.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the POW/ 

MIA accounting community. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1)) shall 

including the following: 

(A) A description and assessment of the current structure 

of the POW/MIA accounting community. 

(B) A description of how the Secretary of Defense will ensure increased oversight of the POW/MIA accounting mission regardless of changes to the POW/MIA accounting 

community. 

(C) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of 

reorganizing the community into a single, central command, including— 

(i) an identification of the elements that could be organized into such command; and 

(ii) an assessment of cost-savings, advantages, and 

disadvantages of— 

(I) transferring the command and control of the 

Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC) 

and the Central Identification Laboratory (CIL) 

from the United States Pacific Command to the 

Office of the Secretary of Defense; 

(II) merging the Joint POW/MIA Accounting 

Command and the Central Identification Laboratory with the Defense Prisoner of War/Missing 

Personnel Office (DPMO); and 

(III) merging the Central Identification Laboratory with the Armed Forces DNA Identification 

Lab (AF-DIL). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
106 

(D) A recommendation on the element of the Department 

of Defense to be responsible for directing POW/MIA accounting activities, and on whether all elements of the 

POW/MIA accounting community should report to that element. 

(E) An estimate of the costs to be incurred, and the cost 

savings to be achieved— 

(i) by relocating central POW/MIA accounting activities to the continental United States; 

(ii) by closing or consolidating existing Joint POW/ 

MIA Accounting Command facilities; and 

(iii) through any actions with respect to the POW/ 

MIA accounting community and POW/MIA accounting 

activities that the Secretary considers advisable for 

purposes of the report. 

(F) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of 

the use by the Department of university anthropology or archaeology programs to conduct field work, particularly in 

politically sensitive environments, including an assessment 

of— 

(i) the potential cost of the use of such programs; 

(ii) whether the use of such programs would result in 

a greater number of identifications; and 

(iii) whether the use of such programs would be consistent with requirements to preserve the integrity of 

the identification process. 

(G) A survey of the manner in which other countries conduct accounting for missing persons, and an assessment 

whether such practices can be used by the United States to 

enhance programs to recover and identify missing members 

of the United States Armed Forces. 

(H) A recommendation as to the advisability of continuing to use a military model for recovery operations, including the impact of the use of such model on diplomatic 

relations with countries in which the United States seeks to 

conduct recovery operations. 

(I) Such recommendations for the reorganization of the 

POW/MIA accounting community as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the other elements of the report, including an estimate of the additional numbers of recoveries and identifications anticipated to be made by the 

accounting community as a result of implementation of the 

reorganization. 

(3) BASIS IN PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall take into account recommendations previously made by the Director of Cost Assessment and 

Program Evaluation, the Inspector General of the Department 

of Defense, and the Comptroller General of the United States regarding the organization of the POW/MIA accounting community. 

(4) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

(A) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 

means— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
107 

(i) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and 

(ii) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the 

House of Representatives. 

(B) The term ‘‘POW/MIA accounting community’’ has the 

meaning given that term in section 1509(b)(2) of title 10, 

United States Code. 

SEC. 582. EXPANSION OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION AUTHORITIES TO 

DEBRIEFING REPORTS OF CERTAIN RECOVERED PERSONS 

WHO WERE NEVER PLACED IN A MISSING STATUS. 

(a) EXPANSION OF COVERED REPORTS.—Section 1506 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (d)— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

(B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 

paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) The Secretary concerned shall withhold from personnel files 

under this section, as privileged information, any survival, evasion, 

resistance, and escape debriefing report provided by a person described in section 1501(c) of this title who is returned to United 

States control which is obtained under a promise of confidentiality 

made for the purpose of ensuring the fullest possible disclosure of 

information.’’; and 

(2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘paragraphs (3) and (4)’’. 

(b) DEFINITION APPLICABLE TO COVERED REPORTS.—Section 1513 

of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new 

paragraph: 

‘‘(9) The term ‘survival, evasion, resistance, and escape debriefing’ means an interview conducted with a person described 

in section 1501(c) of this title who is returned to United States 

control in order to record the person’s experiences while surviving, evading, resisting interrogation or exploitation, or escaping.’’. 

SEC. 583. REVISION OF SPECIFIED SENIOR MILITARY COLLEGES TO 

REFLECT CONSOLIDATION OF NORTH GEORGIA COLLEGE 

AND STATE UNIVERSITY AND GAINESVILLE STATE COLLEGE. 

Paragraph (6) of section 2111a(f) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(6) The University of North Georgia.’’. 

SEC. 584. REVIEW OF SECURITY OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, INCLUDING BARRACKS, TEMPORARY LODGING FACILITIES, 

AND MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES. 

(a) REVIEW OF SECURITY MEASURES.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall conduct a review of security measures on United States military installations, specifically with regard to access to barracks, 

temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family residences on military installations, for the purpose of ensuring the safety of members 

of the Armed Forces and their dependents who reside on military 

installations. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
108 

(b) ELEMENTS OF STUDY.—In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

(1) identify security gaps on military installations; and 

(2) evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using 24-hour 

electronic monitoring or other security measures to protect members and their dependents. 

(c) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study conducted under 

subsection (a), including proposed security measures and an estimate of the costs— 

(1) to eliminate all security gaps identified under subsection 

(b)(1); and 

(2) to provide 24-hour security monitoring or other security 

measures as evaluated under subsection (b)(2). 

SEC. 585. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO CONCESSIONS CONTRACTS AT 

ARMY NATIONAL MILITARY CEMETERIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 446 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 4727. Cemetery concessions contracts 

‘‘(a) CONTRACTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Army may 

enter into a contract with an appropriate entity for the provision of 

transportation, interpretative, or other necessary or appropriate concession services to visitors at the Army National Military Cemeteries. 

‘‘(b) SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS.—(1) The Secretary of the Army 

shall establish and include in each concession contract such requirements as the Secretary determines are necessary to ensure the protection, dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery at which services are 

provided under the contract. 

‘‘(2) A concession contract shall not include operation of the gift 

shop at Arlington National Cemetery without the specific prior authorization by an Act of Congress. 

‘‘(c) FRANCHISE FEES.—A concession contract shall provide for 

payment to the United States of a franchise fee or such other monetary consideration as determined by the Secretary of the Army. The 

Secretary shall ensure that the objective of generating revenue for 

the United States is subordinate to the objectives of honoring the 

service and sacrifices of the deceased members of the armed forces 

and of providing necessary and appropriate services for visitors to 

the Cemeteries at reasonable rates. 

‘‘(d) SPECIAL ACCOUNT.—All franchise fees (and other monetary 

consideration) collected by the United States under subsection (c) 

shall be deposited into a special account established in the Treasury 

of the United States. The funds deposited in such account shall be 

available for expenditure by the Secretary of the Army, to the extent 

authorized and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts, to support activities at the Cemeteries. The funds 

deposited into the account shall remain available until expended. 

‘‘(e) CONCESSION CONTRACT DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘concession contract’ means a contract authorized and entered into 

under this section.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
109 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new 

item: 

‘‘4727. Cemetery concessions contracts.’’. 

SEC. 586. MILITARY SALUTE DURING RECITATION OF PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES NOT IN 

UNIFORM AND BY VETERANS. 

Section 4 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Members of the Armed Forces 

not in uniform and veterans may render the military salute in the 

manner provided for persons in uniform.’’. 

SEC. 587. IMPROVED CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS AND DISSEMINATION OF 

RESULTS. 

(a) IMPROVED DISSEMINATION OF RESULTS IN CHAIN OF COM- MAND.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the results of 

command climate assessments are provided to the relevant individual commander and to the next higher level of command. 

(b) EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary of each military 

department shall require in the performance evaluations and assessments used by each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary a statement by the commander regarding whether the commander has conducted the required command climate assessments. 

(c) EFFECT OF FAILURE TO CONDUCT ASSESSMENT.—The failure of 

a commander to conduct the required command climate assessments 

shall be noted in the commander’s performance evaluation. 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER 

PERSONNEL BENEFITS 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

Sec. 601. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances. 

Sec. 602. Recognition of additional means by which members of the National Guard 

called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less may initially 

report for duty for entitlement to basic pay. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve 

forces. 

Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health 

care professionals. 

Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers. Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special 

pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities. 

Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays. 

Sec. 616. One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of 

precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency. 

Sec. 617. Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in 

the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. 

Sec. 618. Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned officers in the 

reserve components. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances 

Sec. 621. Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense travel 

and transportation authorities in connection with reform of such authorities. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
110 

Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits 

Sec. 631. Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case of members 

whose retired pay is computed using high-three. 

Sec. 632. Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early retirement credit 

earned for significant periods of active Federal status or active duty. 

Sec. 633. Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other dependents. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and 

Operations 

Sec. 641. Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals. 

Sec. 642. Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities for purposes of certain civil service laws. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Sec. 651. Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of human 

remains that were retained by the Department of Defense for forensic pathology investigation. 

Sec. 652. Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional compensation 

and other transitional benefits to dependents of members separated for 

violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

SEC. 601. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY INCREASE IN RATES OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING 

UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. 

Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

SEC. 602. RECOGNITION OF ADDITIONAL MEANS BY WHICH MEMBERS 

OF THE NATIONAL GUARD CALLED INTO FEDERAL SERVICE FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS OR LESS MAY INITIALLY 

REPORT FOR DUTY FOR ENTITLEMENT TO BASIC PAY. 

Subsection (c) of section 204 of title 37, United States Code, is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(c)(1) A member of the National Guard who is called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less is entitled to basic pay 

from the date on which the member, in person or by authorized telephonic or electronic means, contacts the member’s unit. 

‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) does not authorize any expenditure to be paid 

for a period before the date on which the unit receives the member’s 

contact provided under such paragraph. 

‘‘(3) The Secretary of the Army, with respect to the Army National 

Guard, and the Secretary of the Air Force, with respect to the Air 

National Guard, shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this subsection.’’. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and 

Incentive Pays 

SEC. 611. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL 

PAY AUTHORITIES FOR RESERVE FORCES. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2014’’: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
111 

(1) Section 308b(g), relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment 

bonus. 

(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or 

enlistment bonus. 

(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units. 

(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment 

bonus for persons without prior service. 

(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and 

reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. 

(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and 

reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service. 

(7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting 

distance. 

(8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments 

for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service. 

SEC. 612. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN BONUS AND SPECIAL 

PAY AUTHORITIES FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS. 

(a) TITLE 10 AUTHORITIES.—The following sections of title 10, 

United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’: 

(1) Section 2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program. 

(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans 

for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve. 

(b) TITLE 37 AUTHORITIES.—The following sections of title 37, 

United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’: 

(1) Section 302c–1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists. 

(2) Section 302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses. 

(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for 

nurse anesthetists. 

(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties. 

(5) Section 302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental 

officers. 

(6) Section 302j(a), relating to accession bonus for pharmacy 

officers. 

(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties. 

(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. 

SEC. 613. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL PAY AND BONUS AUTHORITIES FOR NUCLEAR OFFICERS. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2014’’: 

(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified 

officers extending period of active service. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
112 

(2) Section 312b(c), relating to nuclear career accession bonus. 

(3) Section 312c(d), relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus. 

SEC. 614. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO TITLE 

37 CONSOLIDATED SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND 

BONUS AUTHORITIES. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2014’’: 

(1) Section 331(h), relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members. 

(2) Section 332(g), relating to general bonus authority for officers. 

(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay 

authorities for nuclear officers. 

(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay 

and bonus authorities for officers. 

(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay 

authorities for officers in health professions. 

(6) Section 351(h), relating to hazardous duty pay. 

(7) Section 352(g), relating to assignment pay or special duty 

pay. 

(8) Section 353(i), relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency 

bonus. 

(9) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. 

SEC. 615. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PAYMENT OF OTHER TITLE 37 BONUSES AND SPECIAL PAYS. 

The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

2014’’: 

(1) Section 301b(a), relating to aviation officer retention 

bonus. 

(2) Section 307a(g), relating to assignment incentive pay. 

(3) Section 308(g), relating to reenlistment bonus for active 

members. 

(4) Section 309(e), relating to enlistment bonus. 

(5) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers 

in critical skills. 

(6) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion 

to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage. 

(7) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between armed forces. 

(8) Section 330(f), relating to accession bonus for officer candidates. 

SEC. 616. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE INCENTIVE PAY FOR MEMBERS OF PRECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMS PURSUING FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY. 

Section 316a(g) of title 37, United States Code is amended by 

striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
113 

SEC. 617. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE BONUS TO CERTAIN CADETS AND 

MIDSHIPMEN ENROLLED IN THE SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS’ TRAINING CORPS. 

(a) BONUS AUTHORIZED.—Chapter 5 of title 37, United States 

Code, is amended by inserting after section 335 the following new 

section: 

‘‘§ 336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training 

Corps 

‘‘(a) CONTRACTING BONUS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary concerned 

may pay a bonus under this section to a cadet or midshipman enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps who executes 

a written agreement described in subsection (c). 

‘‘(b) AMOUNT OF BONUS.—The amount of a bonus under subsection (a) may not exceed $5,000. 

‘‘(c) AGREEMENT.—A written agreement referred to in subsection 

(a) is a written agreement by the cadet or midshipman— 

‘‘(1) to complete field training or a practice cruise under section 2104(b)(6)(A)(ii) of title 10; 

‘‘(2) to complete advanced training under chapter 103 of title 

10; 

‘‘(3) to accept a commission or appointment as an officer of 

the armed forces; and 

‘‘(4) to serve on active duty. 

‘‘(d) PAYMENT METHOD.—Upon acceptance of a written agreement 

under subsection (a) by the Secretary concerned, the total amount 

of the bonus payable under the agreement becomes fixed. The agreement shall specify when the bonus will be paid and whether the 

bonus will be paid in a lump sum or in installments. 

‘‘(e) REPAYMENT.—A person who, having received all or part of a 

bonus under subsection (a), fails to fulfill the terms of the written 

agreement required by such subsection for receipt of the bonus shall 

be subject to the repayment provisions of section 373 of this title. 

‘‘(f) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary concerned shall issue such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. 

‘‘(g) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—No agreement under this section may be entered into after December 31, 2014.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to 

section 335 the following new item: 

‘‘336. Contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve 

Officers’ Training Corps.’’. 

SEC. 618. HEALTH PROFESSIONS STIPEND PROGRAM TO OBTAIN COMMISSIONED OFFICERS IN THE RESERVE COMPONENTS. 

(a) AVAILABILITY OF STIPEND FOR REGISTERED NURSES IN CRITICAL SPECIALTIES.—Subsection (d) of section 16201 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) is eligible for appointment as a Reserve officer for service 

in a reserve component in a Nurse Corps or as a nurse; and’’; 

and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
114 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(B) the participant shall not be eligible to receive such stipend before being appointed as a Reserve officer for service in 

the Ready Reserve in a Nurse Corps or as a nurse;’’. 

(b) SERVICE REQUIRED IN SELECTED RESERVE.—Such section is 

further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the Ready Reserve’’ and inserting ‘‘the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) the participant shall agree to serve, upon successful completion of the program, one year in the Selected Reserve for each 

six months, or part thereof, for which the stipend is provided.’’; 

(3) in subsection (d)(2), by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) the participant shall agree to serve, upon successful completion of the program, one year in the Selected Reserve for each 

six months, or part thereof, for which the stipend is provided.’’; 

and 

(4) in subsection (e)(2)(D), by striking ‘‘the Ready Reserve’’ 

and inserting ‘‘the Selected Reserve’’. 

(c) AMOUNT OF STIPEND.—Subsection (g) of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(g) AMOUNT OF STIPEND.—The amount of a stipend under an 

agreement under subsection (b), (c), (d), or (f) shall be the stipend 

rate in effect for participants in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program under section 2121(d) of this title.’’. 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation 

Allowances 

SEC. 621. TECHNICAL AND STANDARDIZING AMENDMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION 

AUTHORITIES IN CONNECTION WITH REFORM OF SUCH 

AUTHORITIES. 

(a) ESCORTS OF DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS.— (1) INCORPORATION OF ESCORTS OF DEPENDENTS UNDER GEN- ERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 451(a)(2)(C) of title 37, United 

States Code, is amended by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘or as an escort or attendant for dependents of a member for necessary travel performed not later than one year after 

the member is unable to accompany the dependents who are incapable of traveling alone’’. 

(2) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—(A) Section 1036 of 

title 10, United States Code, is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of 

such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 

1036. 

(b) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION OF DEPENDENT PATIENTS.— Section 1040 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘round-trip transportation’’ and all that follows through ‘‘may be paid at the expense of the United States’’ and inserting ‘‘travel and transporVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
115 

tation allowances may be furnished to necessary attendants. 

The dependents and any attendants shall be furnished such 

travel and transportation allowances as specified in regulations 

prescribed under section 464 of title 37.’’; and 

(2) by striking subsection (d). 

(c) TRAVEL IN CONNECTION WITH LEAVE CANCELLED DUE TO

CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.— 

(1) INCORPORATION OF EXPENSES UNDER GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Section 453 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g) REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL IN CONNECTION WITH LEAVE

CANCELLED DUE TO CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.—A member may be 

reimbursed as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 

of this title for travel and related expenses incurred by the member 

as a result of the cancellation of previously approved leave when the 

leave is cancelled in conjunction with the member’s participation in 

a contingency operation and the cancellation occurs within 48 hours 

of the time the leave would have commenced. The settlement for reimbursement under this subsection is final and conclusive.’’. 

(2) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—(A) Section 1053a of 

title 10, United States Code, is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of 

such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 

1053a. 

(d) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION FOR TRAVEL FOR SPECIALTY

HEALTH CARE.—Section 1074i of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses’’ and inserting ‘‘travel and transportation 

allowances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 

464 of title 37’’; and 

(2) in subsection (b), striking ‘‘REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL

UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES.—The Secretary of Defense may provide reimbursement for reasonable travel expenses 

of’’ and inserting ‘‘ALLOWABLE TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION

UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES.—The Secretary of Defense may provide travel and transportation allowances as specified in the regulations referred to in subsection (a) for’’. 

(e) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISPOSITION OF REMAINS OF MEMBERS.—Section 1482(a)(8) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘and roundtrip transportation and prescribed allowances’’ and inserting ‘‘and travel and 

transportation allowances as specified in regulations prescribed 

under section 464 of title 37’’. 

(f) TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION IN CONNECTION WITH FUNERAL

HONORS FUNCTIONS AT FUNERALS FOR VETERANS.—Section 

1491(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 

‘‘transportation (or reimbursement for transportation) and expenses’’ 

and inserting ‘‘travel and transportation allowances as specified in 

regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37’’. 

(g) REPEAL OF REDUNDANT AUTHORITY ON MOTOR VEHICLE

TRANSPORTATION OR STORAGE FOR MEMBERS UNDERGOING PCS OR

EXTENDED DEPLOYMENT.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
116 

(1) REPEAL.—Section 2634 of title 10, United States Code, is 

repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking the 

item relating to section 2634. 

(h) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON TRANSPORTATION OF

HOUSEHOLD GOODS.—Section 453(c)(3) of title 37, United States 

Code, is amended by striking ‘‘(including packing, crating, and 

household goods in temporary storage)’’ and inserting ‘‘(including 

household goods in temporary storage, but excluding packing and 

crating)’’. 

Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay, and 

Survivor Benefits 

SEC. 631. CLARIFICATION OF PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSION IN THE CASE OF MEMBERS WHOSE RETIRED PAY IS 

COMPUTED USING HIGH-THREE. 

(a) CLARIFICATION.—Subsection (f) of section 1401a of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSIONS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the’’ 

and inserting ‘‘PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSIONS

FOR MEMBERS WITH RETIRED PAY COMPUTED USING FINAL

BASIC PAY.—The’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘who first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, and’’ after ‘‘of an 

armed force’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) PREVENTION OF RETIRED PAY INVERSIONS FOR MEMBERS

WITH RETIRED PAY COMPUTED USING HIGH-THREE.—Subject to 

subsections (d) and (e), the monthly retired pay of a member or 

former member of an armed force who first became a member 

of a uniformed service on or after September 8, 1980, may not 

be less, on the date on which the member or former member initially becomes entitled to such pay, than the monthly retired 

pay to which the member or former member would be entitled 

on that date if the member or former member had become entitled to retired pay on an earlier date, adjusted to reflect any applicable increases in such pay under this section. However, in 

the case of a member or former member whose retired pay is 

computed subject to section 1407(f) of this title, paragraph (1) 

(rather than the preceding sentence) shall apply in the same 

manner as if the member or former member first became a 

member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, but 

only with respect to a calculation as of the date on which the 

member or former member first became entitled to retired pay.’’. 

(b) CROSS-REFERENCE AMENDMENTS.—Such section is further 

amended by striking ‘‘subsection (f)(2)’’ in subsections (c)(1), (c)(2), 

(d), and (e) and inserting ‘‘subsection (f)(3)’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
117 

(c) APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (2) of section 1401a(f) of title 10, 

United States Code, as added by the amendment made by subsection (a)(3), applies to the computation of retired pay or retainer 

pay of any person who first became a member of a uniformed service 

on or after September 8, 1980, regardless of when the member first 

becomes entitled to retired or retainer pay. 

SEC. 632. PERIODIC NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE READY RESERVE ON 

EARLY RETIREMENT CREDIT EARNED FOR SIGNIFICANT 

PERIODS OF ACTIVE FEDERAL STATUS OR ACTIVE DUTY. 

Section 12731(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) The Secretary concerned shall periodically notify each member of the Ready Reserve described by paragraph (2) of the current 

eligibility age for retired pay of such member under this section, including any reduced eligibility age by reason of the operation of that 

paragraph. Notice shall be provided by such means as the Secretary 

considers appropriate taking into account the cost of provision of notice and the convenience of members.’’. 

SEC. 633. IMPROVED ASSISTANCE FOR GOLD STAR SPOUSES AND 

OTHER DEPENDENTS. 

(a) ADVOCATES FOR GOLD STAR SPOUSES AND OTHER DEPEND- ENTS.—Each Secretary of a military department shall designate for 

each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary a member of such Armed Force or civilian employee of such military department to assist spouses and other dependents of members of such 

Armed Force (including reserve components thereof) who die on active duty through the provision of the following services: 

(1) Addressing complaints by spouses and other dependents of 

deceased members regarding casualty assistance or receipt of 

benefits authorized by law for such spouses and dependents. 

(2) Providing support to such spouses and dependents regarding such casualty assistance or receipt of such benefits. 

(3) Making reports to appropriate officers or officials in the 

Department of Defense or the military department concerned regarding resolution of such complaints, including recommendations regarding the settlement of claims with respect to such 

benefits, as appropriate. 

(4) Performing such other actions as the Secretary of the military department concerned considers appropriate. 

(b) TRAINING FOR CASUALTY ASSISTANCE PERSONNEL.— 

(1) TRAINING PROGRAM REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense 

shall implement a standardized comprehensive training program on casualty assistance for the following personnel of the 

Department of Defense: 

(A) Casualty assistance officers. 

(B) Casualty assistance calls officers. 

(C) Casualty assistance representatives. 

(2) GENERAL ELEMENTS.—The training program required by 

paragraph (1) shall include training designed to ensure that the 

personnel specified in that paragraph provide the spouse and 

other dependents of a deceased member of the Armed Forces 

with accurate information on the benefits to which they are entitled and other casualty assistance available to them when the 

member dies while serving on active duty in the Armed Forces. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
118 

(3) SERVICE-SPECIFIC ELEMENTS.—The Secretary of the military department concerned may, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, provide for the inclusion in the training program required by paragraph (1) that is provided to casualty assistance personnel of such military department such elements of 

training that are specific or unique to the requirements or particulars of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such military department as the Secretary of the military department 

concerned considers appropriate. 

(4) FREQUENCY OF TRAINING.—Training shall be provided 

under the program required by paragraph (1) not less often 

than annually. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations 

SEC. 641. EXPANSION OF PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND INSTRUMENTALITIES FROM REPRISALS. 

Section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after ‘‘take or fail to take’’ the following: ‘‘, or threaten to 

take or fail to take,’’. 

SEC. 642. MODERNIZATION OF TITLES OF NONAPPROPRIATED FUND 

INSTRUMENTALITIES FOR PURPOSES OF CERTAIN CIVIL 

SERVICE LAWS. 

Section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in the 

matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘Army and Air Force 

Motion Picture Service, Navy Ship’s Stores Ashore’’ and inserting 

‘‘Navy Ships Stores Program’’. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

SEC. 651. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXPENSES FOR CARE AND 

DISPOSITION OF HUMAN REMAINS THAT WERE RETAINED 

BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR FORENSIC PATHOLOGY INVESTIGATION. 

(a) DISPOSITION OF REMAINS OF PERSONS WHOSE DEATH IS INVESTIGATED BY THE ARMED FORCES MEDICAL EXAMINER.— 

(1) COVERED DECEDENTS.—Section 1481(a) of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 

new paragraph: 

‘‘(10) To the extent authorized under section 1482(g) of this 

title, any person not otherwise covered by the preceding paragraphs whose remains (or partial remains) have been retained 

by the Secretary concerned for purposes of a forensic pathology 

investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title.’’. 

(2) AUTHORIZED EXPENSES RELATING TO CARE AND DISPOSITION OF REMAINS.—Section 1482 of such title is amended by 

adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g)(1) The payment of expenses incident to the recovery, care, and 

disposition of the remains of a decedent covered by section 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
119 

1481(a)(10) of this title is limited to those expenses that, as determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, 

would not have been incurred but for the retention of those remains 

for purposes of a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed 

Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of this title. 

‘‘(2) In a case covered by paragraph (1), if the person designated 

under subsection (c) to direct disposition of the remains of a decedent does not direct disposition of the remains that were retained 

for the forensic pathology investigation, the Secretary may pay for 

the transportation of those remains to, and interment or inurnment 

of those remains in, an appropriate place selected by the Secretary, 

in lieu of the transportation authorized to be paid under paragraph 

(8) of subsection (a). 

‘‘(3) In a case covered by paragraph (1), expenses that may be 

paid do not include expenses with respect to an escort under paragraph (8) of subsection (a), whether or not on a reimbursable basis. 

‘‘(4) The Secretary concerned may pay any other expenses relating 

to the remains of such a decedent that are authorized to be paid 

under this section on a reimbursable basis. Amounts reimbursed to 

the Secretary concerned under this subsection shall be credited to 

appropriations available at the time of reimbursement for the payment of such expenses.’’. 

(b) CLARIFICATION OF COVERAGE OF INURNMENT.—Section 

1482(a)(9) of such title is amended by inserting ‘‘or inurnment’’ after 

‘‘Interment’’. 

(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 1482(f) of such title is 

amended by striking the third sentence and inserting the following 

new sentence: ‘‘The Secretary concerned may pay any other expenses 

relating to the remains of such a decedent that are authorized to be 

paid under this section only on a reimbursable basis.’’. 

SEC. 652. STUDY OF THE MERITS AND FEASIBILITY OF PROVIDING 

TRANSITIONAL COMPENSATION AND OTHER TRANSITIONAL BENEFITS TO DEPENDENTS OF MEMBERS SEPARATED FOR VIOLATION OF THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 

study regarding the merits and feasibility of providing transitional 

compensation and other transitional benefits to dependents or 

former dependents of members of the Armed Forces who are separated from the Armed Forces for a violation of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice under the circumstances described in subsection 

(b). 

(b) COVERED MEMBERS AND CIRCUMSTANCES.—The scope of the 

study required by subsection (a) is limited to those circumstances in 

which members of the Armed Forces— 

(1) are convicted by court-martial of an offense under chapter 

47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice); 

(2) are separated from active duty pursuant to the sentence of 

the court-martial; and 

(3) forfeit all pay and allowances pursuant to such sentence. 

(c) STUDY ELEMENTS.—In conducting the study required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
120 

(1) The appropriateness of providing transitional compensation and other benefits, including commissary and exchange 

benefits, to dependents or former dependents of members described in subsection (b), particularly in situations in which 

such dependents or former dependents would be entitled, or 

soon be entitled, to such benefits on account of the years of service of a member. 

(2) Whether there may be instances in which the provision of 

such transitional compensation would not be appropriate. 

(3) Whether such transitional compensation should be limited 

to dependent children of members described in subsection (b). 

(4) The appropriate duration of such transitional compensation for such dependents or former dependents. 

(5) The potential duplication of such transitional compensation with benefits otherwise available for such dependents or 

former dependents under title 10, United States Code, or other 

laws. 

(d) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives a report containing the results of the study 

required by subsection (a), including the Secretary’s determination 

regarding the need for transitional compensation. 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 

Sec. 701. Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled in 

TRICARE Prime. 

Sec. 702. Mental health care treatment through telemedicine. 

Sec. 703. Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of members 

of the Armed Forces with urotrauma. 

Sec. 704. Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the Armed 

Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder. 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

Sec. 711. Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to enter into 

contracts and agreements and make grants to other nonprofit entities. 

Sec. 712. Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in military medical treatment facilities. 

Sec. 713. Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 721. Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of the 

reserve components. 

Sec. 722. Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain Centers of Excellence. 

Sec. 723. Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries. 

Sec. 724. Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to members of 

the Armed Forces and veterans. 

Sec. 725. Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program and 

availability of compounded pharmaceuticals. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
121 

Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health 

Care Benefits 

SEC. 701. FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME FOR CERTAIN 

BENEFICIARIES ENROLLED IN TRICARE PRIME. 

Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1816) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) ACCESS TO TRICARE PRIME.— ‘‘(1) ONE-TIME ELECTION.—Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary shall ensure that each affected eligible beneficiary who is 

enrolled in TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013, may 

make a one-time election to continue such enrollment in 

TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding that a contract described in 

subsection (a)(2)(A) does not allow for such enrollment based on 

the location in which such beneficiary resides. The beneficiary 

may continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime so long as 

the beneficiary resides in the same ZIP code as the ZIP code in 

which the beneficiary resided at the time of such election. 

‘‘(2) ENROLLMENT IN TRICARE STANDARD.—If an affected eligible beneficiary makes the one-time election under paragraph (1), 

the beneficiary may thereafter elect to enroll in TRICARE 

Standard at any time in accordance with a contract described 

in subsection (a)(2)(A). 

‘‘(3) RESIDENCE AT TIME OF ELECTION.—An affected eligible 

beneficiary may not make the one-time election under paragraph (1) if, at the time of such election, the beneficiary does not 

reside— 

‘‘(A) in a ZIP code that is in a region described in subsection (c)(1)(B); and 

‘‘(B) within 100 miles of a military medical treatment facility. 

‘‘(4) NETWORK.—In continuing enrollment in TRICARE Prime 

pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary may determine whether to maintain a TRICARE network of providers in an area 

that is between 40 and 100 miles of a military medical treatment facility.’’. 

SEC. 702. MENTAL HEALTH CARE TREATMENT THROUGH TELEMEDICINE. 

(a) PROVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH CARE VIA TELEMEDICINE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the Transitional Assistance 

Management Program, the Secretary of Defense may extend the 

coverage of such program for covered individuals for an additional 180 days for mental health care provided through telemedicine. 

(2) REPORT.—If the Secretary extends coverage under paragraph (1), by not later than one year after the date of carrying 

out such extension, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following: 

(A) The rate at which individuals are using the extended 

coverage provided pursuant to paragraph (1). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
122 

(B) A description of the mental health care provided pursuant to such subsection. 

(C) An analysis of how the Secretary and the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs coordinate the continuation of care with 

respect to veterans who are no longer eligible for the Transitional Assistance Management Program. 

(D) Any other factors the Secretary of Defense determines 

necessary with respect to extending coverage of the Transitional Assistance Management Program. 

(3) TERMINATION.—The authority of the Secretary to carry out 

subsection (a) shall terminate on December 31, 2018. 

(b) REPORT ON USE OF TELEMEDICINE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the use of telemedicine to improve the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic 

stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental health 

conditions. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall address the following: 

(A) The current status, as of the date of the report, of telemedicine initiatives within the Department of Defense to diagnose and treat post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic 

brain injuries, and mental health conditions. 

(B) Plans for integrating telemedicine into the military 

health care system, including in health care delivery, 

records management, medical education, public health, and 

private sector partnerships. 

(C) The status of the integration of the telemedicine initiatives of the Department with the telemedicine initiatives 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

(D) A description and assessment of challenges to the use 

of telemedicine as a means of in-home treatment, outreach 

in rural areas, and in settings that provide group treatment 

or therapy in connection with treatment of post-traumatic 

stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental 

health conditions, and a description and assessment of efforts to address such challenges. 

(E) A description of privacy issues related to the use of 

telemedicine for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental health conditions, and recommendations for mechanisms to remedy any 

privacy concerns relating to such use of telemedicine. 

(F) A description of professional licensing issues with respect to licensed medical providers who provide treatment 

using telemedicine. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘covered individual’’ means an individual who— 

(A) during the initial 180-day period of being enrolled in 

the Transitional Assistance Management Program, received 

any mental health care; or 

(B) during the one-year period preceding separation or 

discharge from the Armed Forces, received any mental 

health care. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
123 

(2) The term ‘‘telemedicine’’ means the use by a health care 

provider of telecommunications to assist in the diagnosis or 

treatment of a patient’s medical condition. 

SEC. 703. COMPREHENSIVE POLICY ON IMPROVEMENTS TO CARE AND 

TRANSITION OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WITH 

UROTRAUMA. 

(a) COMPREHENSIVE POLICY REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly develop and implement 

a comprehensive policy on improvements to the care, management, and transition of recovering members of the Armed 

Forces with urotrauma. 

(2) SCOPE OF POLICY.—The policy shall cover each of the following: 

(A) The care and management of the specific needs of 

members who are urotrauma patients, including eligibility 

for the Recovery Care Coordinator Program pursuant to the 

Wounded Warrior Act (10 U.S.C. 1071 note). 

(B) The return of members who have recovered to active 

duty when appropriate. 

(C) The transition of recovering members from receipt of 

care and services through the Department of Defense to receipt of care and services through the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after implementing 

the policy under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of Defense and 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes— 

(A) a review that identifies gaps in the care of members 

who are urotrauma patients; and 

(B) suggested options to respond to such gaps. 

(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means the following: 

(A) The Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives. 

(B) The Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 704. PILOT PROGRAM ON INVESTIGATIONAL TREATMENT OF 

MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR TRAUMATIC BRAIN 

INJURY AND POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary shall establish 

a process for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of investigational treatments (including diagnostic testing) of traumatic 

brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder received by members 

of the Armed Forces in health care facilities other than military 

treatment facilities. 

(b) CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL.—The approval by the Secretary 

for a treatment pursuant to subsection (a) shall be subject to the following conditions: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
124 

(1) Any drug or device used in the treatment must be approved, cleared, or made subject to an investigational use exemption by the Food and Drug Administration, and the use of 

the drug or device must comply with rules of the Food and 

Drug Administration applicable to investigational new drugs or 

investigational devices. 

(2) The treatment must be approved by the Secretary following approval by an institutional review board operating in 

accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of Health 

and Human Services, in addition to regulations issued by the 

Secretary of Defense regarding institutional review boards. 

(3) The patient receiving the treatment may not be a retired 

member of the Armed Forces who is entitled to benefits under 

part A, or eligible to enroll under part B, of title XVIII of the 

Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.). 

(c) ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary may 

establish additional restrictions or conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to ensure the protection of human research subjects, appropriate fiscal management, and the validity of the research results. 

(d) DATA COLLECTION AND AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary shall develop and maintain a database containing data from each patient 

case involving the use of a treatment under this section. The Secretary shall ensure that the database preserves confidentiality and 

that any use of the database or disclosures of such data are limited 

to such use and disclosures permitted by law and applicable regulations. 

(e) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after the last 

day of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

a report on the implementation of this section and any available results on investigational treatment clinical trials authorized under 

this section during such fiscal year. 

(f) TERMINATION.—The authority of the Secretary to carry out the 

pilot program authorized by subsection (a) shall terminate on December 31, 2018. 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

SEC. 711. AUTHORITY OF UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF 

HEALTH SCIENCES TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS AND 

AGREEMENTS AND MAKE GRANTS TO OTHER NONPROFIT 

ENTITIES. 

Section 2113(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (B)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘, or any other nonprofit entity’’ after 

‘‘Military Medicine’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘, or nonprofit entity,’’ after ‘‘such Foundation’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (C)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘, or any other nonprofit entity,’’ after 

‘‘Military Medicine’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘, or nonprofit entity,’’ after ‘‘such foundation’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
125 

SEC. 712. PILOT PROGRAM ON INCREASED THIRD-PARTY COLLECTION 

REIMBURSEMENTS IN MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT 

FACILITIES. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAM.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination 

with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall carry out 

a pilot program to demonstrate and assess the feasibility of implementing processes described in paragraph (2) to increase the 

amounts collected under section 1095 of title 10, United States 

Code, from a third-party payer for charges for health care services incurred by the United States at a military medical treatment facility. 

(2) PROCESSES DESCRIBED.—The processes described in this 

paragraph are commercially available enhanced recovery practices for medical payment collection, including revenue-cycle 

management together with rates and percentages of collection in 

accordance with industry standards for such practices. 

(b) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall— 

(1) identify and analyze the best practice option, including 

commercial best practices, with respect to the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that are used in nonmilitary health 

care facilities; and 

(2) conduct a cost-benefit analysis to assess measurable results of the pilot program, including an analysis of— 

(A) the different processes used in the pilot program; 

(B) the amount of third-party collections that resulted 

from such processes; 

(C) the cost to implement and sustain such processes; and 

(D) any other factors the Secretary determines appropriate to assess the pilot program. 

(c) LOCATIONS.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program 

under subsection (a)(1)— 

(1) at military installations that have a military medical 

treatment facility with inpatient and outpatient capabilities; 

and 

(2) at a number of such installations of different military departments that the Secretary determines sufficient to fully assess the results of the pilot program. 

(d) DURATION.—The Secretary shall commence the pilot program 

under subsection (a)(1) by not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act and shall carry out such program for three 

years. 

(e) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after completing the pilot 

program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report describing the results of 

the program, including— 

(1) a comparison of— 

(A) the processes described in subsection (a)(2) that were 

used in the military medical treatment facilities participating in the program; and 

(B) the third-party collection processes used by military 

medical treatment facilities not included in the program; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
126 

(2) a cost analysis of implementing the processes described in 

subsection (a)(2) for third-party collections at military medical 

treatment facilities; 

(3) an assessment of the program, including any recommendations to improve third-party collections; and 

(4) an analysis of the methods employed by the military departments prior to the program with respect to collecting 

charges from third-party payers incurred at military medical 

treatment facilities, including specific data with respect to the 

dollar amount of third-party collections that resulted from each 

method used throughout the military departments. 

SEC. 713. ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs have failed to implement a solution that allows for seamless electronic sharing of medical health care data; and 

(2) despite the significant amount of read-only information 

shared between the Department of Defense and Department of 

Veterans Affairs, most of the information shared as of the date 

of the enactment of this Act is not standardized or available in 

real time to support all clinical decisions. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs— 

(1) shall each ensure that the electronic health record systems 

of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans 

Affairs are interoperable with an integrated display of data, or 

a single electronic health record, by complying with the national standards and architectural requirements identified by 

the Interagency Program Office of the Departments (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Office’’), in collaboration with the Office 

of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 

of the Department of Health and Human Services; and 

(2) shall each deploy modernized electronic health record software supporting clinicians of the Departments by no later than 

December 31, 2016, while ensuring continued support and compatibility with the interoperability platform and full standardsbased interoperability. 

(c) DESIGN PRINCIPLES.—The interoperable electronic health 

records with integrated display of data, or a single electronic health 

record, established under subsection (b) shall adhere to the following principles: 

(1) To the extent practicable, efforts to establish such records 

shall be based on objectives, activities, and milestones established by the Joint Executive Committee Joint Strategic Plan 

Fiscal Years 2013–2015, as well as future addendums or revisions. 

(2) Transition the current data exchanges between the Departments and private sector health care providers where practical 

to modern, open-architecture frameworks that use computable 

data mapped to national standards to make data available for 

determining medical trends and for enhanced clinician decision 

support. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
127 

(3) Principles with respect to open architecture standards, including— 

(A) adoption of national data standards; 

(B) if such national standards do not exist as of the date 

on which the record is being established, adoption of the articulation of data of the Health Data Dictionary until such 

national standards are established; 

(C) use of enterprise investment strategies that maximize 

the use of commercial best practices to ensure robust competition and best value; 

(D) aggressive life-cycle sustainment planning that uses 

proven technology insertion strategies and product upgrade 

techniques; 

(E) enforcement of system design transparency, continuous design disclosure and improvement, and peer reviews 

that align with the requirements of the Federal Acquisition 

Regulation; and 

(F) strategies for data management rights to ensure a 

level competitive playing field and access to alternative solutions and sources across the life-cycle of the programs. 

(4) By the point of deployment, such record must be at a generation 3 level or better for a health information technology system. 

(5) To the extent the Secretaries consider feasible and advisable, principles with respect to— 

(A) the creation of a health data authoritative source by 

the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans 

Affairs that can be accessed by multiple providers and 

standardizes the input of new medical information; 

(B) the ability of patients of both the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to download, 

or otherwise receive electronically, the medical records of 

the patient; and 

(C) the feasibility of establishing a secure, remote, network-accessible computer storage system to provide members of the Armed Forces and veterans the ability to upload 

the health care records of the member or veteran if the 

member or veteran elects to do so and allow medical providers of the Department of Defense and the Department of 

Veterans Affairs to access such records in the course of providing care to the member or veteran. 

(d) PROGRAMS PLAN.—Not later than January 31, 2014, the Secretaries shall prepare and brief the appropriate congressional committees with a detailed programs plan for the oversight and execution of the interoperable electronic health records with an integrated 

display of data, or a single electronic health record, established 

under subsection (b). This briefing and supporting documentation 

shall include— 

(1) programs objectives; 

(2) organization; 

(3) responsibilities of the Departments; 

(4) technical objectives and design principles; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
128 

(5) milestones, including a schedule for the development, acquisition, or industry competitions for capabilities needed to 

satisfy the technical system requirements; 

(6) data standards being adopted by the programs; 

(7) outcome-based metrics proposed to measure the performance and effectiveness of the programs; and 

(8) the level of funding for fiscal years 2014 through 2017. 

(e) LIMITATION ON FUNDS.—Not more than 25 percent of the 

amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 

made available for development, procurement, modernization, or enhancement of the interoperable electronic health records with an integrated display of data, or a single electronic health record, established under subsection (b) for the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs may be obligated or expended until the 

date on which the Secretaries brief the appropriate congressional 

committees of the programs plan under subsection (d). 

(f) REPORTING.— 

(1) QUARTERLY REPORTING.—On a quarterly basis, the Secretaries shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees 

a detailed financial summary. 

(2) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense and Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs shall submit to the appropriate congressional 

committees written notification prior to obligating funds for any 

contract or task order for electronic health record system modernization efforts that is in excess of $5,000,000. 

(g) REQUIREMENTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than October 1, 2014, all health 

care data contained in the Department of Defense AHLTA and 

the Department of Veterans Affairs VistA systems shall be computable in real time and comply with the existing national data 

standards and have a process in place to ensure data is standardized as national standards continue to evolve. On a quarterly basis, the Secretaries shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees updates on the progress of data sharing. 

(2) CERTIFICATION.—At such time as the operational capability described in subsection (b)(1) is achieved, the Secretaries 

shall jointly certify to the appropriate congressional committees 

that the Secretaries have complied with such data standards 

described in paragraph (1). 

(3) RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL.—The Secretaries shall each identify a senior official to be responsible for the modern platforms 

supporting an interoperable electronic health record with an integrated display of data, or a single electronic health record, established under subsection (b). The Secretaries shall also each 

identify a senior official to be responsible for modernizing the 

electronic health record software of the respective Department. 

Such official shall have included within their performance evaluation performance metrics related to the execution of the responsibilities under this paragraph. Not later than 30 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary shall 

submit to the appropriate congressional committees the name of 

each senior official selected under this paragraph. 

(4) COMPTROLLER GENERAL ASSESSMENT.—If both Secretaries 

do not meet the requirements under paragraph (1), the CompVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00160 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
129 

troller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the performance of the compliance of both Secretaries of such requirements. 

(h) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.— (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 60 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall jointly establish 

an executive committee to support the development and validation of adopted standards, required architectural platforms and 

structure, and the capacity to enforce such standards, platforms, and structure as the Secretaries execute requirements 

and develop programmatic assessment as needed by the Secretaries to ensure interoperable electronic health records with an 

integrated display of data, or a single electronic health record, 

are established pursuant to the requirements of subsection (b). 

The Executive Committee shall annually certify to the appropriate congressional committees that such record meets the definition of ‘‘integrated’’ as specified in subsection (k)(4). 

(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The Executive Committee established 

under paragraph (1) shall consist of not more than 6 members, 

appointed by the Secretaries as follows: 

(A) Two co-chairs, one appointed by each of the Secretaries. 

(B) One member from the technical community of the Department of Defense appointed by the Secretary of Defense. 

(C) One member from the technical community of the Department of Veterans Affairs appointed by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs. 

(D) One member from the clinical community of the Department of Defense appointed by the Secretary of Defense. 

(E) One member from the clinical community of the Department of Veterans Affairs appointed by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs. 

(3) REPORTING.—Not later than June 1, 2014, and on a quarterly basis thereafter, the Executive Committee shall submit to 

the appropriate congressional committees a report on the activities of the Committee. 

(i) INDEPENDENT REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall request 

the Defense Science Board to conduct an annual review of the 

progress of the Secretary toward achieving the requirements in 

paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b). The Defense Science Board 

shall submit to the Secretary a report of the findings of the review. 

Not later than 30 days after receiving the report, the Secretary shall 

submit to the appropriate congressional committees the report with 

any comments considered appropriate by the Secretary. 

(j) DEADLINE FOR COMPLETION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

HEALTHCARE ARTIFACT AND IMAGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION PROGRAM.— 

(1) DEADLINE.—The Secretary of Defense shall complete the 

implementation of the Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution program of the Department of Defense by not 

later than the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) REPORT.—Upon completion of the implementation of the 

Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution program, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
130 

the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional 

committees a report describing the extent of the interoperability 

between the Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution program and the Veterans Benefits Management System of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

(k) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 

‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the congressional defense committees; and 

(B) the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives. 

(2) GENERATION 3.—The term ‘‘generation 3’’ means, with respect to an electronic health system, a system that has the technical capability to bring evidence-based medicine to the point of 

care and provide functionality for multiple care venues. 

(3) INTEROPERABLE.—The term ‘‘interoperable’’ refers to the 

ability of different electronic health records systems or software 

to meaningfully exchange information in real time and provide 

useful results to one or more systems. 

(4) INTEGRATED.—The term ‘‘integrated’’ refers to the integration of health data from the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs and outside providers to provide 

clinicians with a comprehensive medical record that allows 

data existing on disparate systems to be shared or accessed 

across functional or system boundaries in order to make the 

most informed decisions when treating patients. 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

SEC. 721. DISPLAY OF BUDGET INFORMATION FOR EMBEDDED MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS OF THE RESERVE COMPONENTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by adding after section 236, as added by section 141 of 

this Act, the following new section: 

‘‘§ 237. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components: display of budget information 

‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a part of 

the documentation that supports the President’s annual budget for 

the Department of Defense, a budget justification display with respect to embedded mental health providers within each reserve component, including the amount requested for each such component.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new 

item: 

‘‘237. Embedded mental health providers of the reserve components: display of budget 

information.’’. 

SEC. 722. REPORT ON ROLE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

IN CERTAIN CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to 

the appropriate congressional committees a report on covered centers 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
131 

of excellence. Such report shall include the following with respect to 

each covered center of excellence: 

(1) The amount of resources obligated by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in support of the center beginning on the date on 

which the center was established, including the amount of 

funds, personnel, time, and functions provided in support of the 

center. 

(2) An estimate of the amount of resources the Secretary plans 

to dedicate to the center during each of fiscal years 2014 

through 2018. 

(3) A description of the role of the Secretary. 

(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means 

the following: 

(A) The Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(B) The Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate. 

(2) The term ‘‘covered centers of excellence’’ means the following: 

(A) The centers established under sections 1621, 1622, 

and 1623 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public 

Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note). 

(B) The center established under section 721 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note). 

(C) The center established under section 723 of such Act 

(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4508). 

SEC. 723. REPORT ON MEMORANDUM REGARDING TRAUMATIC BRAIN 

INJURIES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary identifies, refers, 

and treats traumatic brain injuries with respect to members of the 

Armed Forces who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom before the effective date in June 2010 of directive type memorandum 09–033 titled ‘‘Policy Guidance for Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Deployed 

Setting’’, regarding using a 50-meter distance from an explosion as 

a criterion to properly identify, refer, and treat members for potential traumatic brain injury. 

SEC. 724. REPORT ON PROVISION OF ADVANCED PROSTHETICS AND 

ORTHOTICS TO MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND 

VETERANS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the plans of the Department of Defense 

and the Department of Veterans Affairs, respectively, to ensure that 

the most clinically appropriate prosthetics and orthotics are made 

available to injured members of the Armed Forces and veterans 

using technological advances as appropriate. Such report shall include a description of the processes of each Secretary with respect 

to coordinating and identifying care in the Department of Veterans 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
132 

Affairs for an injured member of the Armed Forces who, prior to the 

member being discharged or released from the Armed Forces, has 

an advanced technology prosthetic. 

(b) COVERED PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS.—The prosthetics and 

orthotics to be covered by the report under subsection (a) shall include powered prosthetics and orthotics that will enable members of 

the Armed Forces and veterans who have suffered amputation and, 

in the case of orthotics wearers, other injuries with limb salvage, to 

restore functionality to the maximum extent practicable. 

(c) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 725. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORTS ON TRICARE RECOVERY 

AUDIT PROGRAM AND AVAILABILITY OF COMPOUNDED 

PHARMACEUTICALS. 

(a) RECOVERY AUDIT PROGRAM.— 

(1) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 

States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report that evaluates the similarities and differences of Medicare and the TRICARE program with respect to identifying and 

recovering improper payments. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report shall contain an evaluation of the 

following: 

(A) Claims processing efforts of both Medicare and the 

TRICARE program to prevent improper payments by denying claims prior to payment. 

(B) Claims processing efforts of both Medicare and the 

TRICARE program to correct improper payments post-payment. 

(C) The effectiveness of post-payment audit programs of 

both Medicare and the TRICARE program to identify and 

correct improper payments that are returned to Medicare or 

the TRICARE program, respectively. 

(b) COMPOUNDED PHARMACEUTICALS.— (1) REPORT.—Not later than September 30, 2014, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the availability of compounded pharmaceuticals in the military health care system. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include 

the following: 

(A) A description of the number of prescriptions for compounded pharmaceuticals processed, and the types of compounded pharmaceuticals dispensed, during fiscal year 

2013 in pharmacy venues. 

(B) A description of the categories of eligible beneficiaries 

who received compounded pharmaceuticals in each pharmacy venue during fiscal year 2013. 

(C) A description of the claims reimbursement methodology used by the manager of the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program to reimburse pharmacy providers for comVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00164 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
133 

pounded pharmaceuticals, and an assessment of the manner in which such methodology compares with reimbursement methodologies used by other health programs of the 

Federal Government. 

(D) A review of the existing accreditation standards, as 

of the date of the report, intended to assure the safety and 

efficacy of compounded pharmaceuticals available through 

the military health care system. 

(3) PHARMACY VENUE DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term 

‘‘pharmacy venue’’ means facilities of the uniformed services, retail pharmacies, and the national mail-order pharmacy program, as described in section 1074g(a)(2)(E) of title 10, United 

States Code. 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

Sec. 801. Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense laboratories. 

Sec. 802. Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for contract 

services. 

Sec. 803. Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations 

Sec. 811. Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation. 

Sec. 812. Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports. 

Sec. 813. Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension or debarment. 

Sec. 814. Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition Programs 

Sec. 821. Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense acquisition 

programs. 

Sec. 822. Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone B approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a space program. 

Sec. 823. Additional responsibility for product support managers for major weapon 

systems. 

Sec. 824. Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes for the acquisition of weapon systems. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations 

in Iraq or Afghanistan 

Sec. 831. Prohibition on contracting with the enemy. 

Sec. 832. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
134 

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and 

Management 

SEC. 801. ENHANCED TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED AT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LABORATORIES. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘military department’’ has the meaning provided 

in section 101 of title 10, United States Code. 

(2) The term ‘‘DOD laboratory’’ or ‘‘laboratory’’ means any facility or group of facilities that— 

(A) is owned, leased, operated, or otherwise used by the 

Department of Defense; and 

(B) meets the definition of ‘‘laboratory’’ as provided in 

subsection (d)(2) of section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler 

Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a). 

(b) AUTHORITY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of a military department each may authorize the heads of DOD 

laboratories to grant nonexclusive, exclusive, or partially exclusive licenses, royalty free or for royalties or for rights to other 

intellectual property, for computer software and its related documentation developed at a DOD laboratory, but only if— 

(A) the computer software and related documentation 

would be a trade secret under the meaning of section 

552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, if the information 

had been obtained from a non-Federal party; 

(B) the public is notified of the availability of the software and related documentation for licensing and interested parties have a fair opportunity to submit applications 

for licensing; 

(C) such licensing activities and licenses comply with the 

requirements under section 209 of title 35, United States 

Code; and 

(D) the software originally was developed to meet the 

military needs of the Department of Defense. 

(2) PROTECTIONS AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE.—The 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of a military department 

each shall provide appropriate precautions against the unauthorized disclosure of any computer software or documentation 

covered by paragraph (1)(A), including exemption from section 

552 of title 5, United States Code, for a period of up to 5 years 

after the development of the computer software by the DOD laboratory. 

(c) ROYALTIES.— 

(1) USE OF ROYALTIES.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), 

any royalties or other payments received by the Department of 

Defense or a military department from licensing computer software or documentation under paragraph (b)(1) shall be retained by the Department of Defense or the military department 

and shall be disposed of as follows: 

(A)(i) The Department of Defense or the military department shall pay each year the first $2,000, and thereafter at 

least 15 percent, of the royalties or other payments, to be diVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00166 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
135 

vided among the employees who developed the computer 

software. 

(ii) The Department of Defense or the military department may provide appropriate lesser incentives, from the 

royalties or other payments, to laboratory employees who 

are not developers of such computer software but who substantially increased the technical value of the software. 

(iii) The Department of Defense or the military department shall retain the royalties and other payments received 

until it makes payments to employees of a DOD laboratory 

under clause (i) or (ii). 

(iv) The Department of Defense or the military department may retain an amount reasonably necessary to pay 

expenses incidental to the administration and distribution 

of royalties or other payments under this section by an organizational unit of the Department of Defense or military 

department other than its laboratories. 

(B) The balance of the royalties or other payments shall be 

transferred by the Department of Defense or the military department to its laboratories, with the majority share of the royalties or other payments going to the laboratory where the development occurred. The royalties or other payments so transferred to any DOD laboratory may be used or obligated by that 

laboratory during the fiscal year in which they are received or 

during the 2 succeeding fiscal years— 

(i) to reward scientific, engineering, and technical employees of the DOD laboratory, including developers of sensitive or classified technology, regardless of whether the 

technology has commercial applications; 

(ii) to further scientific exchange among the laboratories 

of the agency; 

(iii) for education and training of employees consistent 

with the research and development missions and objectives 

of the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD 

laboratory, and for other activities that increase the potential for transfer of the technology of the DOD laboratory; 

(iv) for payment of expenses incidental to the administration and licensing of computer software or other intellectual 

property made at the DOD laboratory, including the fees or 

other costs for the services of other agencies, persons, or organizations for intellectual property management and licensing services; or 

(v) for scientific research and development consistent 

with the research and development missions and objectives 

of the DOD laboratory. 

(C) All royalties or other payments retained by the Department of Defense, military department, or DOD laboratory after 

payments have been made pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and 

(B) that are unobligated and unexpended at the end of the second fiscal year succeeding the fiscal year in which the royalties 

and other payments were received shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States. 

(2) EXCEPTION.—If, after payments under paragraph (1)(A), 

the balance of the royalties or other payments received by the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
136 

Department of Defense or the military department in any fiscal 

year exceed 5 percent of the funds received for use by the DOD 

laboratory for research, development, engineering, testing, and 

evaluation or other related administrative, processing, or valueadded activities for that year, 75 percent of such excess shall be 

paid to the Treasury of the United States and the remaining 25 

percent may be used or obligated under paragraph (1)(B). Any 

funds not so used or obligated shall be paid into the Treasury 

of the United States. 

(3) STATUS OF PAYMENTS TO EMPLOYEES.—Any payment 

made to an employee under this section shall be in addition to 

the regular pay of the employee and to any other awards made 

to the employee, and shall not affect the entitlement of the employee to any regular pay, annuity, or award to which the employee is otherwise entitled or for which the employee is otherwise eligible or limit the amount thereof except that the monetary value of an award for the same project or effort shall be 

deducted from the amount otherwise available under this paragraph. Payments, determined under the terms of this paragraph 

and made to an employee developer as such, may continue after 

the developer leaves the DOD laboratory or the Department of 

Defense or military department. Payments made under this section shall not exceed $75,000 per year to any one person, unless 

the President approves a larger award (with the excess over 

$75,000 being treated as a Presidential award under section 

4504 of title 5, United States Code). 

(d) INFORMATION IN REPORT.—The report required by section 

2515(d) of title 10, United States Code, shall include information regarding the implementation and effectiveness of this section. 

(e) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided in this section shall expire on December 31, 2017. 

SEC. 802. EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON AGGREGATE ANNUAL 

AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACT SERVICES. 

Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489) is amended— 

(1) in subsections (a) and (b), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012 or 

2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012, 2013, or 2014’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘during fiscal years 2012 and 2013’’ in the 

matter preceding paragraph (1); 

(B) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and redesignating 

paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), 

respectively; and 

(C) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2012 and 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2012, 

2013, and 2014’’; 

(3) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012 or 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2012, 2013, or 2014’’; and 

(4) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) CARRYOVER OF REDUCTIONS REQUIRED.—If the reductions required by subsection (c)(2) for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 are not 

implemented, the amounts remaining for those reductions in fiscal 

years 2012 and 2013 shall be implemented in fiscal year 2014.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
137 

SEC. 803. IDENTIFICATION AND REPLACEMENT OF OBSOLETE ELECTRONIC PARTS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement a 

process for the expedited identification and replacement of obsolete 

electronic parts included in acquisition programs of the Department 

of Defense. 

(b) ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED.—At a minimum, the expedited 

process established pursuant to subsection (a) shall— 

(1) include a mechanism pursuant to which contractors, or 

other sources of supply, may provide to appropriate Department 

of Defense officials information that identifies— 

(A) obsolete electronic parts that are included in the specifications for an acquisition program of the Department of 

Defense; and 

(B) suitable replacements for such electronic parts; 

(2) specify timelines for the expedited review and validation 

of information submitted by contractors, or other sources of supply, pursuant to paragraph (1); 

(3) specify procedures and timelines for the rapid submission 

and approval of engineering change proposals needed to accomplish the substitution of replacement parts that have been validated pursuant to paragraph (2); 

(4) provide for any incentives for contractor participation in 

the expedited process that the Secretary may determine to be appropriate; and 

(5) provide that, in addition to the responsibilities under section 2337 of title 10, United States Code, a product support 

manager for a major weapon system shall work to identify obsolete electronic parts that are included in the specifications for 

an aquisition program of the Department of Defense and approve suitable replacements for such electronic parts. 

(c) ADDITIONAL MATTERS.—For the purposes of this section— 

(1) an electronic part is obsolete if— 

(A) the part is no longer in production; and 

(B) the original manufacturer of the part and its authorized dealers do not have sufficient parts in stock to meet the 

requirements of such an acquisition program; and 

(2) an electronic part is a suitable replacement for an obsolete 

electronic part if— 

(A) the part could be substituted for an obsolete part 

without incurring unreasonable expense and without degrading system performance; and 

(B) the part is or will be available in sufficient quantity 

to meet the requirements of such an acquisition program. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
138 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and 

Limitations 

SEC. 811. GOVERNMENT-WIDE LIMITATIONS ON ALLOWABLE COSTS 

FOR CONTRACTOR COMPENSATION. 

(a) AMENDMENT RELATING TO CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES UNDER

DEFENSE CONTRACTS.—Subparagraph (P) of section 2324(e)(1) of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(P) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for a 

fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to the extent that such compensation exceeds $625,000 adjusted annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost 

Index for total compensation for private industry workers, by 

occupational and industry group not seasonally adjusted, except 

that the Secretary of Defense may establish exceptions for positions in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, and cybersecurity fields and other fields requiring unique 

areas of expertise upon a determination that such exceptions are 

needed to ensure that the Department of Defense has continued 

access to needed skills and capabilities.’’. 

(b) AMENDMENT RELATING TO CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES UNDER

CIVILIAN AGENCY CONTRACTS.—Paragraph (16) of section 4304(a) of 

title 41, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(16) Costs of compensation of any contractor employee for a 

fiscal year, regardless of the contract funding source, to the extent that such compensation exceeds $625,000 adjusted annually for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost 

Index for total compensation for private industry workers, by 

occupational and industry group not seasonally adjusted, except 

that the executive agency may establish exceptions for positions 

in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics, medical, 

and cybersecurity fields and other fields requiring unique areas 

of expertise upon a determination that such exceptions are needed to ensure that the executive agency has continued access to 

needed skills and capabilities.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Chapter 11 of title 41, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking section 1127; and 

(2) by striking the item relating to that section in the table 

of sections at the beginning of such chapter. 

(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred under 

contracts entered into on or after the date that is 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 812. INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL COST ESTIMATE INFORMATION 

IN CERTAIN REPORTS. 

(a) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED IN SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORTS.—Section 2432(c)(1) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) as subparagraphs (E), (F), and (G), respectively; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
139 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new 

subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D): 

‘‘(B) for each major defense acquisition program or designated 

major subprogram included in the report— 

‘‘(i) the Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined in section 2433(a)(2) of this title), along with the associated risk 

and sensitivity analysis of that estimate; 

‘‘(ii) the original Baseline Estimate (as that term is defined in section 2435(d)(1) of this title), along with the associated risk and sensitivity analysis of that estimate; 

‘‘(iii) if the original Baseline Estimate was adjusted or revised pursuant to section 2435(d)(2) of this title, such adjusted or revised estimate, along with the associated risk 

and sensitivity analysis of that estimate; and 

‘‘(iv) the primary risk parameters associated with the current procurement cost for the program (as that term is used 

in section 2432(e)(4) of this title); 

‘‘(C) a summary of the history of significant developments 

from the date each major defense acquisition program or designated major subprogram included in the report was first included in a Selected Acquisition Report and program highlights 

since the last Selected Acquisition Report; 

‘‘(D) the significant schedule and technical risks for each such 

program or subprogram, identified at each major milestone and 

as of the quarter for which the current report is submitted;’’; 

(3) in subparagraph (E), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘major defense acquisition program or 

designated major subprogram’’ and inserting ‘‘such program or subprogram’’; 

(B) by inserting ‘‘program acquisition cost and’’ after 

‘‘current’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘that cost’’ and inserting ‘‘those costs’’; and 

(D) by striking ‘‘date the program or subprogram was 

first included in a Selected Acquisition Report’’ and inserting ‘‘December 2001 reporting period’’; and 

(4) in subparagraph (F), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘major defense acquisition program or 

designated major subprogram’’ and inserting ‘‘such program or subprogram’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘date the program or subprogram was 

first included in a Selected Acquisition Report’’ and inserting ‘‘December 2001 reporting period’’. 

(b) PHASE-IN OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS.—Section 2432(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), shall apply to Selected Acquisition Reports after the date 

of the enactment of this Act as follows: 

(1) For the December 2014 reporting period, to Selected Acquisition Reports for five major defense acquisition programs or 

designated major subprograms, as determined by the Secretary. 

(2) For the December 2019 reporting period and each reporting period thereafter, to Selected Acquisition Reports for all 

major defense acquisition programs or designated major subprograms. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
140 

(c) ADDITIONAL DUTIES OF DIRECTOR OF COST ASSESSMENT AND

PROGRAM EVALUATION WITH RESPECT TO SELECTED ACQUISITION

REPORTS.— 

(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Section 2334(a) of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (6); 

(B) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; and’’ at the end 

of paragraph (7); and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph 

(8): 

‘‘(8) annually review the cost and associated information required to be included, by section 2432(c)(1) of this title, in the 

Selected Acquisition Reports required by that section.’’. 

(2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 2334(f)(1) of such title is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘report, an assessment of—’’ and inserting 

‘‘report—’’; 

(B) in each of subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), by inserting ‘‘an assessment of’’ before the first word of the text; 

(C) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(D) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(E) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) a summary of the cost and associated information reviewed under subsection (a)(8), an identification of any trends 

in that information, an aggregation of the cumulative risk of 

the portfolio of systems reviewed under that subsection, and recommendations for improving cost estimates on the basis of the 

review under that subsection.’’. 

SEC. 813. AMENDMENT RELATING TO COMPELLING REASONS FOR 

WAIVING SUSPENSION OR DEBARMENT. 

Section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the 

second sentence by striking ‘‘in a file available for public inspection’’ 

and inserting ‘‘on a publicly accessible website to the maximum extent practicable’’. 

SEC. 814. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM ON ACQUISITION OF MILITARY PURPOSE NONDEVELOPMENTAL ITEMS. 

Section 866(f)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4296; 

10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking ‘‘the date that is five 

years after the date of the enactment of this Act.’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2019.’’. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major 

Defense Acquisition Programs 

SEC. 821. SYNCHRONIZATION OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS FOR 

MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2366b(a)(3) of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
141 

(2) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as subparagraph (H); 

and 

(3) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the following new subparagraph (G): 

‘‘(G) there is a plan to mitigate and account for any costs 

in connection with any anticipated de-certification of cryptographic systems and components during the production 

and procurement of the major defense acquisition program 

to be acquired; and’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall 

apply with respect to major defense acquisition programs which are 

subject to Milestone B approval on or after the date occurring six 

months after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 822. ASSESSMENT OF DEDICATED GROUND CONTROL SYSTEM BEFORE MILESTONE B APPROVAL OF MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS CONSTITUTING A SPACE PROGRAM. 

(a) COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS REQUIRED.—Section 2366b(a) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) in the case of a space system, performs a cost benefit 

analysis for any new or follow-on satellite system using a dedicated ground control system instead of a shared ground control 

system, except that no cost benefit analysis is required to be performed under this paragraph for any Milestone B approval of 

a space system after December 31, 2019.’’. 

(b) REQUIREMENT FOR PLAN AND BRIEFING.—Not later than one 

year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) develop a Department of Defense-wide long-term plan for 

satellite ground control systems, including the Department’s Air 

Force Satellite Control Network; and 

(2) brief the congressional defense committees on such plan. 

SEC. 823. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PRODUCT SUPPORT MANAGERS FOR MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS. 

Section 2337(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (G), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the end 

and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(I) ensure that product support arrangements for the 

weapon system describe how such arrangements will ensure 

efficient procurement, management, and allocation of Government-owned parts inventories in order to prevent unnecessary procurements of such parts.’’. 

SEC. 824. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROCESSES FOR THE ACQUISITION OF WEAPON 

SYSTEMS. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United 

States shall carry out a comprehensive review of the processes and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
142 

procedures of the Department of Defense for the acquisition of weapon systems. 

(b) OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW.—The objective of the review required 

by subsection (a) shall be to identify processes and procedures for 

the acquisition of weapon systems that provide little or no value 

added or for which any value added is outweighed by cost or schedule delays without adding commensurate value. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than January 31, 2015, the Comptroller 

General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review required by subsection (a) and 

based on the objective set forth in subsection (b). The report shall 

include, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) A statement of any processes, procedures, organizations, or 

layers of review that are recommended by the Comptroller General for modification or elimination, including the rationale for 

the modification or elimination recommended based on the objective set forth in subsection (b). 

(2) Such other findings and recommendations, including recommendations for legislative or administrative action, as the 

Comptroller General considers appropriate in light of the review 

required by subsection (a) and the objective set forth in subsection (b). 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan 

SEC. 831. PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH THE ENEMY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TERMINATE OR VOID CONTRACTS, GRANTS, AND

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS AND TO RESTRICT FUTURE AWARD.— (1) IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS AND ENTITIES.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish in each covered combatant 

command a program to identify persons or entities, within the 

area of responsibility of such covered combatant command, 

that— 

(A) provide funds received under a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of the Department of Defense directly 

or indirectly to a covered person or entity; or 

(B) fail to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of 

the funds received under a contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement of the Department of Defense are provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity. 

(2) NOTICE OF PERSONS OR ENTITIES IDENTIFIED.—Upon the 

identification of a person or entity as meeting subparagraph (A) 

or (B) of paragraph (1), the commander of the combatant command concerned, and any deputies of the commander specified 

by the commander for purposes of this section, shall be notified 

in writing of such identification of such person or entity. 

(3) RESPONSIVE ACTIONS.—Upon receipt of a notice under 

paragraph (2), the commander of the combatant command concerned may, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics, and the appropriate Chief of MisVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00174 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
143 

sion, notify the heads of appropriate contracting activities, in 

writing, of such identification and request that the heads of 

such contracting activities exercise the authorities provided pursuant to paragraph (4) and the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, as revised, with respect to any contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that provides funding directly or indirectly to the person or entity covered by the notice. 

(4) AUTHORITIES.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise 

the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to authorize the head of a contracting activity 

in each covered combatant command, pursuant to a request 

from the commander of a covered combatant command under 

paragraph (3)— 

(A) to prohibit, limit, or otherwise place restrictions on 

the award of any Department of Defense contract, grant, or 

cooperative agreement to a person or entity identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(A); 

(B) to terminate for default any Department contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement awarded to a person or entity identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(B); or 

(C) to void in whole or in part any Department contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement awarded to a person or entity identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(A). 

(b) CONTRACT CLAUSE.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Supplement to 

the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised to require 

that— 

(A) the clause described in paragraph (2) shall be included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative 

agreement of the Department of Defense that is awarded on 

or after the date of the enactment of this Act; and 

(B) to the maximum extent practicable, each covered contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of the Department 

of Defense that is awarded before the date of the enactment 

of this Act shall be modified to include the clause described 

in paragraph (2). 

(2) CLAUSE DESCRIBED.—The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that— 

(A) requires the contractor, or the recipient of the grant 

or cooperative agreement, to exercise due diligence to ensure 

that none of the funds received under the contract, grant, 

or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly 

to a covered person or entity; and 

(B) notifies the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or 

cooperative agreement, of the authority of the head of the 

contracting activity to terminate or void the contract, grant, 

or cooperative agreement, in whole or in part. 

(3) COVERED CONTRACT, GRANT, OR COOPERATIVE AGREE- MENT.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘covered contract, grant, or 

cooperative agreement’’ means a contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement with an estimated value in excess of $50,000. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
144 

(4) TREATMENT AS VOID.—For purposes of subsection (a)(4) 

and the exercise under subsection (a)(3) of the authorities in the 

Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition 

Regulation pursuant to this subsection: 

(A) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is 

void is unenforceable as contrary to public policy. 

(B) A contract, grant, or cooperative agreement that is 

void in part is unenforceable as contrary to public policy 

with regard to a segregable task or effort under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement. 

(c) REQUIREMENTS FOLLOWING CONTRACT ACTIONS.—Not later 

than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation 

shall be revised as follows: 

(1) To require that any head of contracting activity taking an 

action pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) to terminate, void, 

or restrict a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement notify in 

writing the contractor or recipient of the grant or cooperative 

agreement, as applicable, of the action. 

(2) To permit, in such manner as the Department of Defense 

Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation as so revised 

shall provide, the contractor or recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement subject to an action taken pursuant to subsection 

(a)(3) or (a)(4) to terminate or void the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement, as the case may be, an opportunity to challenge the action by requesting administrative review within 30 

days after receipt of notice of the action. 

(d) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The commanders of the covered combatant 

commands shall, on an annual basis, review the lists of persons and 

entities previously identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1) in order 

to determine whether or not such persons and entities continue to 

warrant identification pursuant to that subsection. If a commander 

determines pursuant to such a review that a person or entity no 

longer warrants identification pursuant to subsection (a)(1), the 

commander shall notify the heads of contracting activities of the Department of Defense in writing of such determination. 

(e) PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—Classified information relied upon to make an identification pursuant to subsection 

(a)(1) may not be disclosed to a contractor or a recipient of a grant 

or cooperative agreement with respect to which an action is taken 

pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) or to their representatives, in 

the absence of a protective order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction established under Article I or Article III of the Constitution of the United States that specifically addresses the conditions 

upon which such classified information may be so disclosed. 

(f) DELEGATION.— 

(1) RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO IDENTIFICATION AND RE- VIEW.—The commander of a covered combatant command may 

delegate the responsibilities in subsection (a)(3) to any deputies 

of the commander specified by the commander pursuant to that 

subsection. The commander may delegate any responsibilities 

under subsection (d) to the deputy commander of the combatant 

command. Any delegation of responsibilities under this paragraph shall be made in writing. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
145 

(2) NONDELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTRACT ACTIONS.—The authority provided by subsections (a)(3) and (a)(4) 

to terminate, void, or restrict contracts, grants, and cooperative 

agreements may not be delegated below the level of head of contracting activity. 

(g) INCLUSION OF INFORMATION ON CONTRACT ACTIONS IN

FAPIIS.—Upon the termination, voiding, or restriction of a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (a)(3) 

or (a)(4), the head of contracting activity concerned shall provide for 

the inclusion in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other formal system of records on 

contractors or entities, of appropriate information on the termination, voiding, or restriction of the contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement. 

(h) REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 each year through 

2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on the use of the authorities in this 

section in the preceding calendar year, including the following: 

(A) For each instance in which a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement was terminated or voided, or entry into 

contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements was restricted, pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), the following: 

(i) An explanation of the basis for the action taken. 

(ii) The value of the contract, grant, or cooperative 

agreement terminated or voided. 

(iii) The value of all contracts, grants, or cooperative 

agreements of the Department of Defense in force with 

the person or entity concerned at the time the contract, 

grant, or cooperative agreement was terminated or 

voided. 

(iv) Information on how the goods or services covered 

by the terminated or voided contract, grant, or cooperative agreement were otherwise obtained by the commander of the combatant command concerned. 

(B) For each instance in which a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of a person or entity identified pursuant 

to subsection (a)(1) was not terminated or voided pursuant 

to subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4), or the future award of contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements to such person or 

entity was not restricted pursuant to subsection (a)(3) or 

(a)(4), an explanation why such action was not taken. 

(2) FORM.—Any report under this subsection may be submitted in classified form. 

(i) OTHER DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘covered combatant command’’ means United 

States Central Command, United States European Command, 

United States Africa Command, United States Southern Command, or United States Pacific Command. 

(2) The term ‘‘head of contracting activity’’ has the meaning 

given that term in subpart 601 of part 1 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
146 

(3) The term ‘‘covered person or entity’’ means a person or entity that is actively opposing United States or coalition forces 

involved in a contingency operation in which members of the 

armed forces are actively engaged in hostilities. 

(j) SUNSET.—The provisions of this section shall cease to be effective on December 31, 2018. 

SEC. 832. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PRODUCTS AND 

SERVICES PRODUCED IN COUNTRIES ALONG A MAJOR 

ROUTE OF SUPPLY TO AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (f) of section 801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 

123 Stat. 2399), as amended by section 841(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 

126 Stat. 1845), is further amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2015’’. 

(b) CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (b)(1)(B) of such 

section is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and the NATO International Security Assistance Force’’ and inserting ‘‘or NATO forces’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘to Afghanistan’’ and inserting ‘‘to or from Afghanistan’’. 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

Sec. 901. Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise 

architecture. 

Sec. 902. Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government 

tenants onto military installations in the United States. 

Sec. 903. Clarification of authority for the command acquisition executive of the 

United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 904. Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters. 

Sec. 905. Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and education. 

Sec. 906. Modification of reference to major Department of Defense headquarters activities instruction. 

Sec. 907. Personnel security. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

Sec. 911. National security space satellite reporting policy. 

Sec. 912. National security space defense and protection. 

Sec. 913. Space acquisition strategy. 

Sec. 914. Space control mission report. 

Sec. 915. Responsive launch. 

Sec. 916. Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program. 

Sec. 917. Eagle Vision system. 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities 

Sec. 921. Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities. 

Sec. 922. Department of Defense intelligence priorities. 

Sec. 923. Defense Clandestine Service. 

Sec. 924. Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation. 

Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters 

Sec. 931. Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense tactical 

data link systems. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
147 

Sec. 932. Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States Cyber Command. 

Sec. 933. Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense. 

Sec. 934. Modification of requirement for Report on Department of Defense Progress 

in Defending the Department and the Defense Industrial Base from 

Cyber Events. 

Sec. 935. Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 936. Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses. 

Sec. 937. Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the Department 

of Defense. 

Sec. 938. Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities. 

Sec. 939. Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems and tactical communications systems. 

Sec. 940. Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons. 

Sec. 941. Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace. 

Sec. 942. National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education matters. 

Subtitle E—Total Force Management 

Sec. 951. Reviews of appropriate manpower performance. 

Subtitle A—Department of Defense 

Management 

SEC. 901. REVISIONS TO COMPOSITION OF TRANSITION PLAN FOR DEFENSE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE. 

Section 2222(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘defense business enterprise 

architecture’’ and inserting ‘‘target defense business systems 

computing environment described in subsection (d)(3)’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘existing as of September 30, 2011 (known 

as ‘legacy systems’) that will not be part of the defense business enterprise architecture’’ and inserting ‘‘that will be 

phased out of the defense business systems computing environment within three years after review and certification as 

‘legacy systems’ by the investment management process established under subsection (g)’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘that provides for reducing the use of 

those legacy systems in phases’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘legacy systems (referred to 

in subparagraph (B)) that will be a part of the target defense 

business systems computing environment described in subsection (d)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘existing systems that are part of 

the target defense business systems computing environment’’. 

SEC. 902. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON POTENTIAL RELOCATION OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TENANTS ONTO MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United 

States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

containing the results of a review of the potential for and obstacles 

to Federal agencies other than the Department of Defense relocating 

onto military installations to save costs or enhance security. At a 

minimum, the Comptroller General shall answer the following questions in the report: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
148 

(1) What opportunities exist to permit non-Department of Defense Federal agencies to locate operations onto military installations having excess facilities adequate for the tenant agencies’ 

mission needs? 

(2) What factors would the Department of Defense and the potential tenant agencies need to consider in determining whether 

such tenancy would be viable? 

(3) What obstacles exist to the consolidation of non-Department of Defense Federal agencies onto military installations 

having adequate excess capacity? 

(4) What non-Federal organizations are tenants on the installations (such as those under the enhanced use leasing program)? 

(b) SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION OF INSTALLATIONS THAT SUPPORT

ARCTIC MISSIONS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall 

specifically evaluate the potential for and obstacles to consolidation 

of Federal tenants on installations that support Arctic missions, focusing on Federal entities with homeland security, defense, international trade, commerce, and other national security-related functions that are compatible with the missions of the military installations, or can be used to protect national interests in the Arctic region. 

SEC. 903. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE COMMAND ACQUISITION EXECUTIVE OF THE UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. 

Section 167(e)(4)(C)(ii) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by inserting after ‘‘shall be’’ the following: ‘‘responsible to the commander for rapidly delivering acquisition solutions to meet validated special operations-peculiar requirements, subordinate to the 

Defense Acquisition Executive in matters of acquisition, subject to 

the same oversight as the service acquisition executives, and’’. 

SEC. 904. STREAMLINING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a 

plan for streamlining Department of Defense management headquarters by changing or reducing the size of staffs, eliminating tiers 

of management, cutting functions that provide little or no added 

value, and consolidating overlapping and duplicative programs and 

offices. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF PLAN.—The plan required by subsection (a) 

shall include the following for each covered organization: 

(1) A description of the planned changes or reductions in 

staffing and services provided by military personnel, civilian 

personnel, and contractor personnel. 

(2) A description of the planned changes or reductions in 

management, functions, and programs and offices. 

(3) The estimated cumulative savings to be achieved over a 

10-fiscal-year period beginning with fiscal year 2015, and estimated savings to be achieved for each of fiscal years 2015 

through 2024. 

(c) COVERED ORGANIZATION.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered 

organization’’ includes each of the following: 

(1) The Office of the Secretary of Defense. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
149 

(2) The Joint Staff. 

(3) The Defense Agencies. 

(4) The Department of Defense field activities. 

(5) The headquarters of the combatant commands. 

(6) Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief of Staff 

of the Army, and the Army Staff. 

(7) The major command headquarters of the Army. 

(8) The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office of the 

Chief of Naval Operations, and Headquarters, United States 

Marine Corps. 

(9) The major command headquarters of the Navy and the 

Marine Corps. 

(10) Headquarters, Department of the Air Force, including 

the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of the Air 

Force Chief of Staff, and the Air Staff. 

(11) The major command headquarters of the Air Force. 

(12) The National Guard Bureau. 

(d) REPORTS.— 

(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a). 

(2) STATUS REPORT.—The Secretary shall include with the 

Department of Defense materials submitted to Congress with 

the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2016 through 

2024 (as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 

31, United States Code) a report describing the implementation 

of the plan required by subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year and any modifications to the plan required due to 

changing circumstances. Each such report shall include the following: 

(A) A summary of savings achieved for each covered organization in the fiscal year covered by such report. 

(B) A description of the savings through changes or reductions in staffing and services provided by military personnel, civilian personnel, and contractor personnel in the 

fiscal year covered by such report. 

(C) A description of the savings through changes or reductions in management, functions, and programs and offices in the fiscal year covered by such report. 

(D) In any case in which savings under the plan fall 

short of the objective of the plan for the fiscal year covered 

by such report, an explanation of the reasons for the shortfall. 

(E) A description of any modifications to the plan made 

during the fiscal year covered by such report, and an explanation of the reasons for such modifications. 

SEC. 905. UPDATE OF STATUTORY STATEMENT OF FUNCTIONS OF THE 

CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF RELATING TO 

DOCTRINE, TRAINING, AND EDUCATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (5) of section 153(a) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
150 

(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and technical standards, and executing actions,’’ after ‘‘policies’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and training’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(D) Formulating policies for concept development and experimentation for the joint employment of the armed forces. 

‘‘(E) Formulating policies for gathering, developing, and disseminating joint lessons learned for the armed forces.’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such paragraph 

is amended by striking ‘‘DOCTRINE, TRAINING, AND EDUCATION’’ and 

inserting ‘‘JOINT FORCE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES’’. 

SEC. 906. MODIFICATION OF REFERENCE TO MAJOR DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES INSTRUCTION. 

Section 194(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Directive 5100.73’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘Instruction 5100.73, titled ‘Major DoD Headquarters Activities’.’’. 

SEC. 907. PERSONNEL SECURITY. 

(a) COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, acting 

through the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation and in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, submit to the appropriate committees of 

Congress a report setting forth a comprehensive analysis comparing the quality, cost, and timeliness of personnel security 

clearance investigations and reinvestigations for employees and 

contractor personnel of the Department of Defense that are conducted by the Office of Personnel Management with the quality, 

cost, and timeliness of personnel security clearance investigations and reinvestigations for such personnel that are conducted 

by components of the Department of Defense. 

(2) ELEMENTS OF ANALYSIS.—The analysis under paragraph 

(1) shall do the following: 

(A) Determine and compare, for each of the Office of Personnel Management and the components of the Department 

that conduct personnel security investigations as of the date 

of the analysis, the quality, cost, and timeliness associated 

with personnel security investigations and reinvestigations 

of each type and level of clearance, and identify the elements that contribute to such cost, schedule, and performance. 

(B) Identify mechanisms for permanently improving the 

transparency of the cost structure of personnel security investigations and reinvestigations. 

(b) PERSONNEL SECURITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EMPLOYEES AND CONTRACTORS.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that 

the current approach for obtaining personnel security investigations 

and reinvestigations for employees and contractor personnel of the 

Department of Defense is not the most efficient and effective approach for the Department, the Secretary shall develop a plan, by 

not later than October 1, 2014, for the transition of personnel security investigations and reinvestigations to the approach preferred by 

the Secretary. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
151 

(c) STRATEGY FOR MODERNIZING PERSONNEL SECURITY.— (1) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the 

Director of National Intelligence, and the Director of the Office 

of Management and Budget shall jointly develop, implement, 

and provide to the appropriate committees of Congress a strategy to modernize all aspects of personnel security for the Department of Defense with the objectives of improving quality, 

providing for continuous monitoring, decreasing unauthorized 

disclosures of classified information, lowering costs, increasing 

efficiencies, and enabling and encouraging reciprocity. 

(2) CONSIDERATION OF ANALYSIS.—In developing the strategy 

under paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Directors shall consider the results of the analysis required by subsection (a) and 

the results of any ongoing reviews of recent unauthorized disclosures of national security information. 

(3) METRICS.— 

(A) METRICS REQUIRED.—In developing the strategy required by paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Directors 

shall jointly establish metrics to measure the effectiveness 

of the strategy in meeting the objectives specified in that 

paragraph. 

(B) REPORT.—At the same time the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2019 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, 

United States Code, the Secretary and the Directors shall 

jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a 

report on the metrics established under paragraph (1), including an assessment using the metrics of the effectiveness 

of the strategy in meeting the objectives specified in paragraph (1). 

(4) ELEMENTS.—In developing the strategy required by paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Directors shall address issues 

including but not limited to the following: 

(A) Elimination of manual or inefficient processes in investigations and reinvestigations for personnel security, 

wherever practicable, and automating and integrating the 

elements of the investigation and adjudication processes, 

including in the following: 

(i) The clearance application process. 

(ii) Investigation case management. 

(iii) Adjudication case management. 

(iv) Investigation methods for the collection, analysis, 

storage, retrieval, and transfer of data and records 

from investigative sources and between any case management systems. 

(v) Records management for hiring and clearance decisions. 

(B) Elimination or reduction, where possible, of the use 

of databases and information sources that cannot be 

accessed and processed automatically electronically, or 

modification of such databases and information sources, if 

appropriate and cost-effective, to enable electronic access 

and processing. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
152 

(C) Access and analysis of government, publically available, and commercial data sources, including social media, 

that provide independent information pertinent to adjudication guidelines and termination standards to improve 

quality and timeliness, and reduce costs, of investigations 

and reinvestigations. 

(D) Use of government-developed and commercial technology for continuous monitoring and evaluation of government and commercial data sources that can identify and 

flag information pertinent to hiring and clearance determinations. 

(E) Standardization of forms used for routine reporting 

required of cleared personnel (such as travel, foreign contacts, and financial disclosures) and use of continuous 

monitoring technology to access databases containing such 

reportable information to independently obtain and analyze 

reportable data and events. 

(F) Establishment of an authoritative central repository 

of personnel security information that is accessible electronically at multiple levels of classification and eliminates 

technical barriers to rapid access to information necessary 

for eligibility determinations and reciprocal recognition 

thereof, including the ability to monitor the status of an individual and any events related to the continued eligibility 

of such individual for employment or clearance during intervals between investigations. 

(G) Elimination or reduction of the scope of, or alteration 

of the schedule for, periodic reinvestigations of cleared personnel, when such action is appropriate in light of the information provided by continuous monitoring or evaluation 

technology. 

(H) Electronic integration of personnel security processes 

and information systems with insider threat detection and 

monitoring systems, and pertinent law enforcement, counterintelligence and intelligence information, for threat detection and correlation, including those processes and systems operated by components of the Department of Defense 

for purposes of local security, workforce management, or 

other related purposes. 

(5) RISK-BASED MONITORING.—The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall— 

(A) include the development of a risk-based approach to 

monitoring and reinvestigation that prioritizes which 

cleared individuals shall be subject to frequent reinvestigations and random checks, such as the personnel with the 

broadest access to classified information or with access to 

the most sensitive classified information, including information technology specialists or other individuals with 

such broad access commonly known as ‘‘super users’’; 

(B) ensure that if the system of continuous monitoring for 

all cleared individuals described in paragraph (4)(D) is implemented in phases, such system shall be implemented on 

a priority basis for the individuals prioritized under subparagraph (A); and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
153 

(C) ensure that the activities of individuals prioritized 

under subparagraph (A) shall be monitored especially 

closely. 

(d) RECIPROCITY OF CLEARANCES.—The Secretary of Defense and 

the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly ensure the reciprocity of personnel security clearances among positions requiring 

personnel holding secret, top secret, or sensitive compartmented information clearances, to the maximum extent feasible consistent 

with national security requirements. 

(e) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.— (1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Not later than 150 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the 

United States shall carry out a review of the personnel security 

process. 

(2) OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW.—The objective of the review required by paragraph (1) shall be to identify the following: 

(A) Differences between the metrics used by the Department of Defense and other departments and agencies that 

grant security clearances in granting reciprocity for security 

clearances, and the manner in which such differences can 

be harmonized. 

(B) The extent to which existing Federal Investigative 

Standards are relevant, complete, and sufficient for guiding 

agencies and individual investigators as they conduct their 

security clearance background investigations. 

(C) The processes agencies have implemented to ensure 

quality in the security clearance background investigation 

process. 

(D) The extent to which agencies have developed and implemented outcome-focused performance measures to track 

the quality of security clearance investigations and any insights from these measures. 

(E) The processes agencies have implemented for resolving incomplete or subpar investigations, and the actions 

taken against government employees and contractor personnel who have demonstrated a consistent failure to abide 

by quality assurance measures. 

(3) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the 

appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results of 

the review required by paragraph (1). 

(f) TASK FORCE ON RECORDS ACCESS FOR SECURITY CLEARANCE

BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS.— 

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Suitability and Security Clearance 

Performance Accountability Council, as established by Executive Order No. 13467, shall convene a task force to examine the 

different policies and procedures that determine the level of access to public records provided by State and local authorities in 

response to investigative requests by Federal Government employees or contracted employees carrying out background investigations to determine an individual’s suitability for access to 

classified information or secure government facilities. 

(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The members of the task force shall include, but need not be limited to, the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
154 

(A) The Chair of the Suitability and Security Clearance 

Performance and Accountability Council, who shall serve 

as chair of the task force. 

(B) A representative from the Office of Personnel Management. 

(C) A representative from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 

(D) A representative from the Department of Defense responsible for administering security clearance background 

investigations. 

(E) Representatives from Federal law enforcement agencies within the Department of Justice and the Department 

of Homeland Security involved in security clearance background investigations. 

(F) Representatives from State and local law enforcement 

agencies, including— 

(i) agencies in rural areas that have limited resources and less than 500 officers; and 

(ii) agencies that have more than 1,000 officers and 

significant technological resources. 

(G) A representative from Federal, State, and local law 

enforcement associations involved with security clearance 

background administrative actions and appeals. 

(H) Representatives from Federal, State, and local judicial systems involved in the sharing of records to support 

security clearance background investigations. 

(3) INITIAL MEETING.—The task force shall convene its initial 

meeting not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment 

of this Act. 

(4) DUTIES.—The task force shall do the following: 

(A) Analyze the degree to which State and local authorities comply with investigative requests made by Federal 

Government employees or contractor employees carrying out 

background investigations to determine an individual’s 

suitability for access to classified information or secure government facilities, including the degree to which investigative requests are required but never formally requested. 

(B) Analyze limitations on the access to public records 

provided by State and local authorities in response to investigative requests by Federal Government employees and 

contractor employees described in subparagraph (A), including, but not be limited to, limitations relating to budget 

and staffing constraints on State and local authorities, any 

procedural and legal obstacles impairing Federal access to 

State and local law enforcement records, or inadequate investigative procedural standards for background investigators. 

(C) Provide recommendations for improving the degree of 

cooperation and records-sharing between State and local 

authorities and Federal Government employees and contractor employees described in subparagraph (A). 

(5) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the task force shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a detailed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
155 

statement of the findings and conclusions of the task force pursuant to this subsection, together with the recommendations of 

the task force for such legislative or administrative action as 

the task force considers appropriate. 

(g) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee 

on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of 

the House of Representatives. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

SEC. 911. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE SATELLITE REPORTING POLICY. 

(a) NOTIFICATION OF FOREIGN INTERFERENCE OF NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE.—Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space 

‘‘(a) NOTICE REQUIRED.—The Commander of the United States 

Strategic Command shall, with respect to each intentional attempt 

by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States 

national security space capability, provide to the appropriate congressional committees— 

‘‘(1) not later than 48 hours after the Commander determines 

that there is reason to believe such attempt occurred, notice of 

such attempt; and 

‘‘(2) not later than 10 days after the date on which the Commander determines that there is reason to believe such attempt 

occurred, a notification described in subsection (b) with respect 

to such attempt. 

‘‘(b) NOTIFICATION DESCRIPTION.—A notification described in this 

subsection is a written notification that includes— 

‘‘(1) the name and a brief description of the national security 

space capability that was impacted by an attempt by a foreign 

actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a United States national 

security space capability; 

‘‘(2) a description of such attempt, including the foreign actor, 

the date and time of such attempt, and any related capability 

outage and the mission impact of such outage; and 

‘‘(3) any other information the Commander considers relevant. 

‘‘(c) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ 

means— 

‘‘(1) the congressional defense committees; and 

‘‘(2) with respect to a notice or notification related to an attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
156 

United States national security space capability that is intelligence-related, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.’’. 

(b) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the 

beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following item: 

‘‘2278. Notification of foreign interference of national security space.’’. 

SEC. 912. NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE DEFENSE AND PROTECTION. 

(a) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly enter into an arrangement with the 

National Research Council to respond to the near-term and longterm threats to the national security space systems of the United 

States by— 

(1) conducting a review of— 

(A) the range of options available to address such threats, 

in terms of deterring hostile actions, defeating hostile actions, and surviving hostile actions until such actions conclude; 

(B) strategies and plans to counter such threats, including resilience, reconstitution, disaggregation, and other appropriate concepts; and 

(C) existing and planned architectures, warfighter requirements, technology development, systems, workforce, or 

other factors related to addressing such threats; and 

(2) recommending architectures, capabilities, and courses of 

action to address such threats and actions to address the affordability, technology risk, and any other potential barriers or 

limiting factors in implementing such courses of action. 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the National Research Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, 

and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a report 

containing the results of the review conducted pursuant to the 

arrangement under subsection (a) and the recommended courses 

of action identified pursuant to such arrangement. 

(2) FORM.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex. 

(c) SPACE PROTECTION STRATEGY.—Section 911(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 

2271 note) is amended by striking ‘‘including each of the matters required by subsection (c).’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘including— 

‘‘(A) each of the matters required by subsection (c); and 

‘‘(B) a description of how the Department of Defense and 

the intelligence community plan to provide necessary national security capabilities, through alternative space, airborne, or ground systems, if a foreign actor degrades, denies access to, or destroys United States national security 

space capabilities.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
157 

SEC. 913. SPACE ACQUISITION STRATEGY. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) commercial satellite services, particularly communications, are needed to satisfy Department of Defense requirements; 

(2) the Department predominately uses one-year leases to obtain commercial satellite services, which are often the most expensive and least strategic method to acquire necessary commercial satellite services; and 

(3) consistent with the required authorization and appropriations, Congress encourages the Department to pursue a variety 

of methods to reduce cost and meet the necessary military requirements, including multi-year leases and procurement of 

Government-owned payloads on commercial satellites. 

(b) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief 

Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall establish a 

strategy to enable the multi-year procurement of commercial satellite services. 

(c) BASIS.—The strategy required under subsection (b) shall include and be based on— 

(1) an analysis of financial or other benefits to acquiring satellite services through multi-year acquisition approaches; 

(2) an analysis of the risks associated with such acquisition 

approaches; 

(3) an identification of methods to address planning, programming, budgeting, and execution challenges to such approaches, including methods to address potential termination 

liability or cancellation costs generally associated with multiyear contracts; 

(4) an identification of any changes needed in the requirements development and approval processes of the Department of 

Defense to facilitate effective and efficient implementation of 

such strategy, including an identification of any consolidation 

of requirements for such services across the Department that 

may achieve increased buying power and efficiency; and 

(5) an identification of any necessary changes to policies, procedures, regulations, or statutes. 

(d) BRIEFINGS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief 

Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall provide 

to the congressional defense committees a briefing regarding the 

strategy required under subsection (b), including the elements 

required under subsection (c). 

(2) INTERIM BRIEFING.—At the same time that the budget for 

fiscal year 2015 is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) 

of title 31, United States Code, the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with 

the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, 

shall provide to the congressional defense committees an interim briefing regarding the strategy required under subsection 

(b). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
158 

SEC. 914. SPACE CONTROL MISSION REPORT. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the space control mission of the Department of Defense. Such report shall include— 

(1) an identification of existing offensive and defensive space 

control systems, policies, and technical possibilities of future 

systems; 

(2) an identification of any gaps or risks in existing space 

control system architecture and possibilities for improvement or 

mitigation of such gaps or risks; 

(3) a description of existing and future sensor coverage and 

ground processing capabilities for space situational awareness; 

(4) an explanation of the extent to which all relevant and 

available information is being utilized for space situational 

awareness to detect, track, and identify objects in space; 

(5) a description of existing space situational awareness data 

sharing practices, including what information is being shared 

and what the benefits and risks of such sharing are to the national security of the United States; and 

(6) plans for the future space control mission, including force 

levels and structure. 

SEC. 915. RESPONSIVE LAUNCH. 

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

(1) United States Strategic Command has identified three 

needs as a result of dramatically increased demand and dependence on space capabilities as follows: 

(A) To rapidly augment existing space capabilities when 

needed to expand operational capability. 

(B) To rapidly reconstitute or replenish critical space capabilities to preserve continuity of operations capability. 

(C) To rapidly exploit and infuse space technological or 

operational innovations to increase the advantage of the 

United States. 

(2) Operationally responsive low cost launch could assist in 

addressing such needs of the combatant commands. 

(b) STUDY.—The Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space 

shall conduct a study on responsive, low-cost launch efforts. Such 

study shall include— 

(1) a review of existing and past operationally responsive, 

low-cost launch efforts by domestic or foreign governments or 

industry; 

(2) an identification of the conditions or requirements for responsive launch that would provide the necessary military 

value, including the requisite payload capacity, timelines for responsiveness, and the target launch costs; 

(3) a technology assessment of various methods to develop an 

operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability; and 

(4) an assessment of the viability of greater utilization of innovative methods, including the use of secondary payload 

adapters on existing launch vehicles. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Department of Defense Executive Agent for 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
159 

Space shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

containing— 

(1) the results of the study conducted under subsection (b); 

and 

(2) a consolidated plan for development within the Department of Defense of an operationally responsive, low-cost launch 

capability. 

(d) GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE REVIEW.—Not later 

than 60 days after the date on which the report required under subsection (c) is submitted to the congressional defense committees, the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of such report and any 

related findings or recommendations that the Comptroller General 

considers appropriate. 

SEC. 916. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR SPACE PROTECTION 

PROGRAM. 

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 

by section 201 for the Department of Defense for research, test, development, and evaluation, Air Force, and available for the Space 

Protection Program (PE# 0603830F) as specified in the funding 

table in section 4201, $10,000,000 may not be obligated or expended 

until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense 

committees a copy of the study conducted at the direction of the Deputy Secretary of Defense on the counter space strategy of the Department of Defense that resulted in significant revisions to that strategy by the Department. 

SEC. 917. EAGLE VISION SYSTEM. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the Eagle Vision system. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

include a description and assessment of the various commands, 

components of the Armed Forces, and Defense Agencies to which 

control of the Eagle Vision system could be transferred from the 

Headquarters of the Air Force, including the actions to be completed before transfer, potential schedules for transfer, and the 

effects of transfer on the capabilities of the system or use of the 

system by other elements of the Department. 

(b) LIMITATION ON CERTAIN ACTIONS.—The Secretary of the Air 

Force may not undertake any changes to the organization or control 

of the Eagle Vision system until 90 days after the date of the submittal to the congressional defense committees of the report required 

by subsection (a). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
160 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and 

Intelligence-Related Activities 

SEC. 921. REVISION OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY TO ENGAGE IN COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES AS SECURITY FOR INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES. 

(a) CONGRESSIONAL SUBMISSION FOR REQUIRED AUDITS.—The 

second sentence of section 432(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by striking ‘‘the intelligence committees’’ and all that 

follows and inserting ‘‘the congressional defense committees and the 

congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 437(c) of 

this title).’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF DESIGNATION OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

AS REQUIRED OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—Section 436(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘Defense Intelligence Agency’’ and inserting 

‘‘Department of Defense’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘management and supervision’’ and inserting 

‘‘oversight’’. 

(c) CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.—Section 437 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the intelligence committees’’ 

and inserting ‘‘congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Consistent with’’ and all that follows 

through ‘‘the Secretary’’ and insert ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the intelligence committees’’ and inserting 

‘‘congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) CONGRESSIONAL INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘congressional intelligence committees’ has the 

meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 

1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).’’. 

SEC. 922. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PRIORITIES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) establish a written policy governing the internal coordination and prioritization of intelligence priorities of the Office of 

the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the military departments to improve identification 

of the intelligence needs of the Department of Defense; 

(2) identify any significant intelligence gaps of the Office of 

the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and the military departments; and 

(3) provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

Senate a briefing on the policy established under paragraph (1) 

and the gaps identified under paragraph (2). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
161 

SEC. 923. DEFENSE CLANDESTINE SERVICE. 

(a) CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.—Not more than 50 percent of the 

funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise available to the Department of Defense for the Defense Clandestine Service for fiscal year 2014 may be obligated or expended for the Defense 

Clandestine Service until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the covered congressional committees that— 

(1) the Defense Clandestine Service is designed primarily to— 

(A) fulfill priorities of the Department of Defense that are 

unique to the Department of Defense or otherwise unmet; 

and 

(B) provide unique capabilities to the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act 

of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))); and 

(2) the Secretary of Defense has designed metrics that will be 

used to ensure that the Defense Clandestine Service is employed 

as described in paragraph (1). 

(b) ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS.—Not later than 120 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for five 

years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the covered congressional committees a detailed assessment of Defense Clandestine 

Service employment and performance based on the metrics referred 

to in subsection (a)(2). 

(c) NOTIFICATION OF FUTURE CHANGES TO DESIGN.—Following 

the submittal of the certification referred to in subsection (a), in the 

event that any significant change is made to the Defense Clandestine Service, the Secretary shall promptly notify the covered congressional committees of the nature of such change. 

(d) QUARTERLY BRIEFINGS.—The Secretary of Defense shall quarterly provide to the covered congressional committees a briefing on 

the deployments and collection activities of personnel of the Defense 

Clandestine Service. 

(e) COVERED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered congressional committees’’ means the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. 

SEC. 924. PROHIBITION ON NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM CONSOLIDATION. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated or 

otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used 

during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act 

and ending on December 31, 2014, to execute— 

(1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program budget from the Department of Defense budget; 

(2) the consolidation of the National Intelligence Program 

budget within the Department of Defense budget; or 

(3) the establishment of a new appropriations account or appropriations account structure for the National Intelligence Program budget. 

(b) BRIEFING REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 30 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the 

Director of National Intelligence shall jointly provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on IntelVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00193 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
162 

ligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the Senate a briefing regarding any planning relating 

to the future execution of the activities described in subsection (a) 

that has occurred during the two-year period ending on such date 

and any anticipated future planning relating to such execution or 

related efforts. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘National 

Intelligence Program’’ has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). 

(2) NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM BUDGET.—The term 

‘‘National Intelligence Program budget’’ means the portions of 

the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence Program. 

Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters 

SEC. 931. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR INVENTORY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TACTICAL DATA LINK SYSTEMS. 

Section 934(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1885; 10 U.S.C. 

2225 note) is amended by inserting ‘‘and an assessment of 

vulnerabilities to such systems in anti-access or area-denial environments’’ before the semicolon. 

SEC. 932. AUTHORITIES, CAPABILITIES, AND OVERSIGHT OF THE 

UNITED STATES CYBER COMMAND. 

(a) PROVISION OF CERTAIN OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES.—The Secretary of Defense shall take such actions as the Secretary considers 

appropriate to provide the United States Cyber Command operational military units with infrastructure and equipment enabling 

access to the Internet and other types of networks to permit the 

United States Cyber Command to conduct the peacetime and wartime missions of the Command. 

(b) CYBER RANGES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall review existing cyber 

ranges and adapt one or more such ranges, as necessary, to 

support training and exercises of cyber units that are assigned 

to execute offensive military cyber operations. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each range adapted under paragraph (1) 

shall have the capability to support offensive military operations against targets that— 

(A) have not been previously identified and prepared for 

attack; and 

(B) must be compromised or neutralized immediately 

without regard to whether the adversary can detect or attribute the attack. 

(c) PRINCIPAL ADVISOR ON MILITARY CYBER FORCE MATTERS.— 

(1) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall designate, from 

among the personnel of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, a Principal Cyber Advisor to act as the principal advisor to the Secretary on military cyber forces and activities. The Secretary may only designate an official under this 

paragraph if such official was appointed to the position in 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
163 

which such official serves by and with the advice and consent 

of the Senate. 

(2) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Principal Cyber Advisor shall be 

responsible for the following: 

(A) Overall supervision of cyber activities related to offensive missions, defense of the United States, and defense of 

Department of Defense networks, including oversight of policy and operational considerations, resources, personnel, 

and acquisition and technology. 

(B) Such other matters relating to offensive military cyber 

forces as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of this 

subsection. 

(3) CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM.—The Principal Cyber Advisor 

shall— 

(A) integrate the cyber expertise and perspectives of appropriate organizations within the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense, Joint Staff, military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commands, by establishing and maintaining a full-time cross-functional team of subject matter 

experts from those organizations; and 

(B) select team members, and designate a team leader, 

from among those personnel nominated by the heads of 

such organizations. 

(d) TRAINING OF CYBER PERSONNEL.—The Secretary shall establish and maintain training capabilities and facilities in the Armed 

Forces and, as the Secretary considers appropriate, at the United 

States Cyber Command, to support the needs of the Armed Forces 

and the United States Cyber Command for personnel who are assigned offensive and defensive cyber missions in the Department of 

Defense. 

SEC. 933. MISSION ANALYSIS FOR CYBER OPERATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) MISSION ANALYSIS REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

conduct a mission analysis of the cyber operations of the Department of Defense. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The mission analysis under subsection (a) shall 

include the following: 

(1) The concept of operations and concept of employment for 

cyber operations forces. 

(2) An assessment of the manpower needs for cyber operations 

forces, including military requirements for both active and reserve components and civilian requirements. 

(3) An assessment of the mechanisms for improving recruitment, retention, and management of cyber operations forces, including through focused recruiting; educational, training, or 

certification scholarships; bonuses; or the use of short-term or 

virtual deployments without the need for permanent relocation. 

(4) A description of the alignment of the organization and reporting chains of the Department, the military departments, 

and the combatant commands. 

(5) An assessment of the current, as of the date of the analysis, and projected equipping needs of cyber operations forces. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
164 

(6) An analysis of how the Secretary, for purposes of cyber operations, depends upon organizations outside of the Department, including industry and international partners. 

(7) Methods for ensuring resilience, mission assurance, and 

continuity of operations for cyber operations. 

(8) An evaluation of the potential roles of the reserve components in the concept of operations and concept of employment 

for cyber operations forces required under paragraph (1), including— 

(A) in consultation with the Secretaries of the military 

departments and the Commander of the United States 

Cyber Command, an identification of the Department of 

Defense cyber mission requirements that could be discharged by members of the reserve components; 

(B) in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, consideration of ways to ensure that the Governors of 

the several States, through the Council of Governors, as appropriate, have an opportunity to provide the Secretary of 

Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security an independent evaluation of State cyber capabilities, and State 

cyber needs that cannot be fulfilled through the private sector; 

(C) an identification of the existing capabilities, facilities, 

and plans for cyber activities of the reserve components, including— 

(i) an identification of current positions in the reserve 

components serving Department cyber missions; 

(ii) an inventory of the existing cyber skills of reserve 

component personnel, including the skills of units and 

elements of the reserve components that are 

transitioning to cyber missions; 

(iii) an inventory of the existing infrastructure of the 

reserve components that contributes to the cyber missions of the United States Cyber Command, including 

the infrastructure available to units and elements of 

the reserve components that are transitioning to such 

missions; and 

(iv) an assessment of the manner in which the military departments plan to use the reserve components to 

meet total force resource requirements, and the effect of 

such plans on the potential ability of members of the 

reserve components to support the cyber missions of the 

United States Cyber Command; 

(D) an assessment of whether the National Guard, when 

activated in a State status (either State Active Duty or in 

a duty status under title 32, United States Code) can operate under unique and useful authorities to support domestic cyber missions and requirements of the Department or 

the United States Cyber Command; 

(E) an assessment of the appropriateness of hiring on a 

part-time basis non-dual status technicians who possess appropriate cyber security expertise for purposes of assisting 

the National Guard in protecting critical infrastructure 

and carrying out cyber missions; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
165 

(F) an assessment of the current and potential ability of 

the reserve components to— 

(i) attract and retain personnel with substantial, relevant cyber technical expertise who use those skills in 

the private sector; 

(ii) organize such personnel into units at the State, 

regional, or national level under appropriate command 

and control arrangements for Department cyber missions; 

(iii) meet and sustain the training standards of the 

United States Cyber Command; and 

(iv) establish and manage career paths for such personnel; 

(G) a determination of how the reserve components could 

contribute to total force solutions to cyber operations requirements of the United States Cyber Command; and 

(H) development of an estimate of the personnel, infrastructure, and training required, and the costs that would 

be incurred, in connection with implementing a strategy for 

integrating the reserve components into the total force for 

support of the cyber missions of the Department and United 

States Cyber Command, including by taking into account 

the potential savings under the strategy through use of personnel referred to in subparagraph (C)(i), provided that for 

specific cyber units that exist or are transitioning to a cyber 

mission, the estimate shall examine whether there are misalignments in existing plans between unit missions and facility readiness to support such missions. 

(c) LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN ACTIONS.— 

(1) REDUCTION IN PERSONNEL OF AIR NATIONAL GUARD CYBER

UNITS.—No reduction in personnel of a cyber unit of the Air National Guard of the United States may be implemented or carried out in fiscal year 2014 before the submittal of the report 

required by subsection (d). 

(2) REDUCTION IN PERSONNEL AND CAPACITY OF AIR NATIONAL

GUARD RED TEAMS.—No reduction in the personnel or capacity 

of a Red Team of the Air National Guard of the United States 

may be implemented or carried out unless the report required 

by subsection (d) includes a certification that the personnel or 

capacity to be reduced is directly related to Red Team capabilities that are no longer required. 

(d) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the completion of the mission analysis under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing— 

(1) the results of the mission analysis; 

(2) recommendations for improving or changing the roles, organization, missions, concept of operations, or authorities related to the cyber operations of the Department; and 

(3) any other matters concerning the mission analysis that the 

Secretary considers appropriate. 

(e) NATIONAL GUARD ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 30 days after 

the date on which the Secretary submits the report required under 

subsection (d), the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall submit 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
166 

to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the role of 

the National Guard in supporting the cyber operations mission of 

the Department of Defense as such mission is described in such report. 

(f) FORM.—The report under subsection (d) shall be submitted in 

unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 934. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT FOR REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRESS IN DEFENDING THE DEPARTMENT AND THE DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE FROM 

CYBER EVENTS. 

Section 935(b)(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4339) 

is amended— 

(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘capabilities.’’ and inserting ‘‘capabilities, including estimated economic impacts.’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘remediation.’’ and inserting ‘‘remediation and estimates of economic losses resulting 

from such event.’’. 

SEC. 935. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE SOFTWARE 

LICENSES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) UPDATED PLAN.— (1) UPDATE.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department of the Defense shall, in consultation with the chief information officers of the military departments and the Defense 

Agencies, update the plan for the inventory of selected software 

licenses of the Department of Defense required under section 

937 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 2223 note) to include a plan for the inventory of all software licenses of the Department of Defense for 

which a military department spends more than $5,000,000 annually on any individual title, including a comparison of licenses purchased with licenses in use. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The update required under paragraph (1) 

shall— 

(A) include plans for implementing an automated solution capable of reporting the software license compliance 

position of the Department and providing a verified audit 

trail, or an audit trail otherwise produced and verified by 

an independent third party; 

(B) include details on the process and business systems 

necessary to regularly perform reviews, a procedure for 

validating and reporting deregistering and registering new 

software, and a mechanism and plan to relay that information to the appropriate chief information officer; and 

(C) a proposed timeline for implementation of the updated plan in accordance with paragraph (3). 

(3) SUBMISSION.—Not later than September 30, 2015, the 

Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees the updated 

plan required under paragraph (1). 

(b) PERFORMANCE PLAN.—If the Chief Information Officer of the 

Department of Defense determines through the implementation of 

the process and business systems in the updated plan required by 

subsection (a) that the number of software licenses of the DepartVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00198 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
167 

ment for an individual title for which a military department spends 

greater than $5,000,000 annually exceeds the needs of the Department for such software licenses, or the inventory discloses that there 

is a discrepancy between the number of software licenses purchased 

and those in actual use, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall implement a plan to bring the number of such 

software licenses into balance with the needs of the Department and 

the terms of any relevant contract. 

SEC. 936. CYBER OUTREACH AND THREAT AWARENESS FOR SMALL 

BUSINESSES. 

Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a briefing 

on options for strengthening outreach and threat awareness programs for small businesses (as defined in section 3 of the Small 

Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) that are awarded contracts by the Department of Defense to assist such businesses to— 

(1) understand the gravity and scope of cyber threats; 

(2) develop a plan to protect intellectual property; and 

(3) develop a plan to protect the networks of such businesses. 

SEC. 937. JOINT FEDERATED CENTERS FOR TRUSTED DEFENSE SYSTEMS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) FEDERATION REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for 

the establishment of a joint federation of capabilities to support 

the trusted defense system needs of the Department of Defense 

(in this section referred to as the ‘‘federation’’). 

(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the federation shall be to serve 

as a joint, Department-wide federation of capabilities to support 

the trusted defense system needs of the Department to ensure security in the software and hardware developed, acquired, maintained, and used by the Department, pursuant to the trusted defense systems strategy of the Department and supporting policies related to software assurance and supply chain risk management. 

(b) DISCHARGE OF ESTABLISHMENT.—In providing for the establishment of the federation, the Secretary shall consider whether the 

purpose of the federation can be met by existing centers in the Department. If the Department determines that there are capabilities 

gaps that cannot be satisfied by existing centers, the Department 

shall devise a strategy for creating and providing resources for such 

capabilities to fill such gaps. 

(c) CHARTER.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a charter for the federation. The charter shall— 

(1) be established pursuant to the trusted defense systems 

strategy of the Department and supporting policies related to 

software assurance and supply chain risk management; and 

(2) set forth— 

(A) the role of the federation in supporting program offices in implementing the trusted defense systems strategy 

of the Department; 

(B) the software and hardware assurance expertise and 

capabilities of the federation, including policies, standards, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
168 

requirements, best practices, contracting, training, and testing; 

(C) the requirements for the discharge by the federation, 

in coordination with the Center for Assured Software of the 

National Security Agency, of a program of research and development to improve automated software code vulnerability analysis and testing tools; 

(D) the requirements for the federation to procure, manage, and distribute enterprise licenses for automated software vulnerability analysis tools; and 

(E) the requirements for the discharge by the federation, 

in coordination with the Defense Microelectronics Activity, 

of a program of research and development to improve hardware vulnerability, testing, and protection tools. 

(d) REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, at the time of the submittal to Congress of the 

budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 pursuant to section 1105 

of title 31, United States Code, a report on the funding and management of the federation. The report shall set forth such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate regarding the optimal 

placement of the federation within the organizational structure of 

the Department, including responsibility for the funding and management of the federation. 

SEC. 938. SUPERVISION OF THE ACQUISITION OF CLOUD COMPUTING 

CAPABILITIES. 

(a) SUPERVISION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, acting 

through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight 

Council, supervise the following: 

(A) Review, development, modification, and approval of 

requirements for cloud computing solutions for data analysis and storage by the Armed Forces and the Defense 

Agencies, including requirements for cross-domain, enterprise-wide discovery and correlation of data stored in cloud 

and non-cloud computing databases, relational and non-relational databases, and hybrid databases. 

(B) Review, development, modification, approval, and implementation of plans for the competitive acquisition of 

cloud computing systems or services to meet requirements 

described in subparagraph (A), including plans for the 

transition from current computing systems to systems or 

services acquired. 

(C) Development and implementation of plans to ensure 

that the cloud systems or services acquired pursuant to subparagraph (B) are interoperable and universally accessible 

and usable through attribute-based access controls. 

(D) Integration of plans under subparagraphs (B) and 

(C) with enterprise-wide plans of the Armed Forces and the 

Department of Defense for the Joint Information Environment and the Defense Intelligence Information Environment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
169 

(2) DIRECTION.—The Secretary shall provide direction to the 

Armed Forces and the Defense Agencies on the matters covered 

by paragraph (1) by not later than March 15, 2014. 

(b) INTEGRATION WITH INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY EFFORTS.—The 

Secretary shall coordinate with the Director of National Intelligence 

to ensure that activities under this section are integrated with the 

Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise in order 

to achieve interoperability, information sharing, and other efficiencies. 

(c) LIMITATION.—The requirements of subparagraphs (B), (C), and 

(D) of subsection (a)(1) shall not apply to a contract for the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities in an amount less than 

$1,000,000. 

(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to alter or affect the authorities or responsibilities of the 

Director of National Intelligence under section 102A of the National 

Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3024). 

SEC. 939. CYBER VULNERABILITIES OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

WEAPON SYSTEMS AND TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

Congress a report on the status of the capability of each military department to operate in non-permissive and hostile cyber environments. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) A description and assessment of potential cyber threats or 

threat systems to major weapon systems and tactical communications systems that could emerge in the next five years. 

(2) A description and assessment of cyber vulnerabilities of 

current major weapon and tactical communications systems. 

(3) A detailed description of the current strategy to detect, 

deter, and defend against cyber attacks on current and planned 

major weapon systems and tactical communications systems. 

(4) An estimate of the costs anticipated to be incurred in addressing cyber vulnerabilities to Department of Defense weapon 

systems and tactical communications systems over the next five 

years. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 940. CONTROL OF THE PROLIFERATION OF CYBER WEAPONS. 

(a) INTERAGENCY PROCESS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF POLICY.—The 

President shall establish an interagency process to provide for the 

establishment of an integrated policy to control the proliferation of 

cyber weapons through unilateral and cooperative law enforcement 

activities, financial means, diplomatic engagement, and such other 

means as the President considers appropriate. 

(b) INDUSTRY PARTICIPATION.—The President shall include, to the 

extent practicable, private industry participation in the process established under subsection (a). 

(c) OBJECTIVES.—The objectives of the interagency process established under subsection (a) shall be as follows: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
170 

(1) To identify the intelligence, law enforcement, and financial sanctions tools that can and should be used to suppress the 

trade in cyber tools and infrastructure that are or can be used 

for criminal, terrorist, or military activities while preserving the 

ability of governments and the private sector to use such tools 

for legitimate purposes of self-defense. 

(2) To establish a statement of principles to control the proliferation of cyber weapons, including principles for controlling 

the proliferation of cyber weapons that can lead to expanded cooperation and engagement with international partners. 

(d) RECOMMENDATIONS.—The interagency process established 

under subsection (a) shall develop, by not later than 270 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, recommendations on means for 

the control of the proliferation of cyber weapons, including a draft 

statement of principles and a review of applicable legal authorities. 

SEC. 941. INTEGRATED POLICY TO DETER ADVERSARIES IN CYBERSPACE. 

(a) INTEGRATED POLICY.—The President shall establish an interagency process to provide for the development of an integrated policy 

to deter adversaries in cyberspace. 

(b) OBJECTIVE.—The objective of the interagency process established under subsection (a) shall be to develop a deterrence policy 

for reducing cyber risks to the United States and our allies. 

(c) REPORT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the integrated policy developed pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) FORM.—The report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 942. NATIONAL CENTERS OF ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE EDUCATION MATTERS. 

(a) PRESERVATION OF DESIGNATION DURING ACADEMIC YEARS

2013–2014 AND 2014–2015.—Each institution of higher education 

that was designated by the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security as a National Center of Academic 

Excellence in Information Assurance Education as of January 1, 

2013, shall continue to be designated as such a Center through 

June 30, 2015, provided that such institution maintains the standards by which such institution was originally designated as such a 

Center. 

(b) ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATION OF ACCREDITATION OR

DESIGNATION PROCESS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation 

with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the National Security Agency, and other appropriate departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government and non-Federal organizations, 

shall— 

(1) assess the National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education program strengths and weaknesses, including processes and criteria used to develop curricula and designate an institution of higher education as a 

National Center of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
171 

(2) assess the maturity of information assurance as an academic discipline; 

(3) assess the role the Federal Government should play in the 

future development of curricula and other criteria for designating or accrediting information assurance education programs of institutions of higher education as National Centers 

of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education; 

(4) assess the advantages and disadvantages of broadening 

the governance structure of such Centers; 

(5) assess the extent to which existing and emerging curricula 

and other criteria for designation as such a Center is aligned 

with the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education and 

will provide the knowledge and skills needed by the information 

assurance workforce for existing and future employment; 

(6) make recommendations for improving and evolving the 

mechanisms and processes for developing the curricula and 

other criteria for accrediting or designating information assurance programs of institutions of higher education as Centers; 

and 

(7) make recommendations on transitioning the responsibility 

for developing the curricula and other criteria for accrediting or 

designating information assurance programs of institutions of 

higher education as Centers from the sole administration of the 

National Security Agency. 

(c) ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COLLABORATION

WITH CENTERS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall assess the collaboration of the Department of Defense with the National Centers of 

Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education. Such assessment shall include— 

(1) the extent to which the information security scholarship 

program of the Department of Defense established under chapter 112 of title 10, United States Code, contributes to— 

(A) building the capacity to educate the information assurance and cybersecurity workforce needed for the future; 

and 

(B) employing exceptional information assurance and cybersecurity workers in the Department; and 

(2) mechanisms for increasing Department employment of 

graduates of such Centers. 

(d) PLAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation 

with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the 

National Security Agency, and other appropriate departments 

and agencies of the Federal Government and non-Federal organizations, shall submit to Congress— 

(A) a plan for implementing the recommendations made 

pursuant to subsection (b) on improving and evolving the 

mechanisms and processes for developing the curricula and 

other criteria for accrediting or designating the information 

assurance programs of institutions of higher education as 

National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information 

Assurance Education; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
172 

(B) the results of the assessments conducted under subsections (b) and (c); and 

(C) the recommendations made under subsection (b). 

(2) CONSULTATION.—In developing the plan under paragraph 

(1), the Secretary shall consult with appropriate representatives 

of information assurance interests in departments and agencies 

of the Federal Government, State and local governments, academia, and the private sector. 

(e) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the meaning 

given the term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

(20 U.S.C. 1001). 

Subtitle E—Total Force Management 

SEC. 951. REVIEWS OF APPROPRIATE MANPOWER PERFORMANCE. 

(a) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Section 2330a of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (i) 

and (j), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsections (g) and (h): 

‘‘(g) INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than May 1 of each 

year, beginning with 2014 and ending with 2016, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report containing the Inspector General’s assessment of— 

‘‘(1) the efforts by the Department of Defense to compile the 

inventory pursuant to subsection (c); and 

‘‘(2) the reviews conducted under subsection (e), including the 

actions taken to resolve the findings of the reviews in accordance with section 2463 of this title. 

‘‘(h) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than September 

30 of each year, beginning with 2014 and ending with 2016, the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the Comptroller 

General’s assessment of the efforts by the Department of Defense to 

implement subsections (e) and (f).’’. 

(b) EXTENSION OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT ON INVENTORY.—Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2402) is amended 

by striking ‘‘2011 and 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 

and 2015’’. 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1001. General transfer authority. 

Sec. 1002. Budgetary effects of this Act. 

Sec. 1003. Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements. 

Sec. 1004. Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
173 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia. 

Sec. 1012. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities. 

Sec. 1013. Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for 

counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

Sec. 1021. Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the construction of naval vessels. 

Sec. 1022. Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no cost 

to the Navy. 

Sec. 1023. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class 

cruisers or dock landing ships. 

Sec. 1024. Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions. 

Sec. 1025. Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships. 

Sec. 1026. Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment. 

Sec. 1027. Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of the strike 

forces of the Navy. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

Sec. 1031. Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military commissions. 

Sec. 1032. Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program reporting requirement. 

Sec. 1033. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United 

States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1034. Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals 

detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1035. Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

Sec. 1036. Report on information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1037. Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo. 

Sec. 1038. Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, and 

prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to 

Yemen. 

Sec. 1039. Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo 

if transferred to the United States. 

Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations 

Sec. 1041. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations. 

Sec. 1042. Counterterrorism operational briefings. 

Sec. 1043. Report on process for determining targets of lethal or capture operations. 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces 

Sec. 1051. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe. 

Sec. 1052. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and 

Communications System. 

Sec. 1053. Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of Nuclear 

Weapons Council. 

Sec. 1054. Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons stockpile, 

nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system. 

Sec. 1055. Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad. 

Sec. 1056. Implementation of New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1057. Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles. 

Sec. 1058. Report on New START Treaty. 

Sec. 1059. Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
174 

Sec. 1060. Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms reductions with the 

Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1061. Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control treaty obligations. 

Sec. 1062. Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the nuclear forces 

of the United States. 

Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

Sec. 1071. Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze 

captured records. 

Sec. 1072. Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic spectrum. 

Sec. 1073. Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate. 

Sec. 1074. Notification of modifications to Army force structure. 

Sec. 1075. Aircraft joint training. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

Sec. 1081. Online availability of reports submitted to Congress. 

Sec. 1082. Oversight of combat support agencies. 

Sec. 1083. Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology. 

Sec. 1084. Repeal and modification of reporting requirements. 

Sec. 1085. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department 

of Defense efficiencies. 

Sec. 1086. Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces and 

United States Special Operations Command. 

Sec. 1087. Reports on unmanned aircraft systems. 

Sec. 1088. Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1089. Civil Air Patrol. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Sec. 1091. Technical and clerical amendments. 

Sec. 1092. Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated information system programs. 

Sec. 1093. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance. 

Sec. 1094. Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and authority to waive 

reimbursement of costs of activities for certain nongovernmental personnel. 

Sec. 1095. Amendments to certain national commissions. 

Sec. 1096. Strategy for future military information operations capabilities. 

Sec. 1097. Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security. 

Sec. 1098. Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire suppression and 

other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force. 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

SEC. 1001. GENERAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the 

Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 

2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or 

any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 

(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), the 

total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer 

under the authority of this section may not exceed 

$5,000,000,000. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
175 

(3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of funds between military 

personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2). 

(b) LIMITATIONS.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to 

transfer authorizations— 

(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have 

a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and 

(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has 

been denied authorization by Congress. 

(c) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A transfer made from 

one account to another under the authority of this section shall be 

deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which 

the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred. 

(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall promptly notify 

Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a). 

SEC. 1002. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, jointly submitted for printing in 

the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and Senate 

Budget Committees, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage in the House acting first on the 

conference report or amendment between the Houses. 

SEC. 1003. AUDIT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FISCAL YEAR 2018 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 

(a) AUDIT OF DOD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.—In addition to the 

requirement under section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 

U.S.C. 2222 note) that the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan describe specific actions to be taken and the costs associated with ensuring that the financial statements of the Department 

of Defense are validated as ready for audit by not later than September 30, 2017, upon the conclusion of fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that a full audit is performed on the 

financial statements of the Department of Defense for such fiscal 

year. The Secretary shall submit to Congress the results of that 

audit by not later than March 31, 2019. 

(b) INCLUSION OF AUDIT IN FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AUDIT

READINESS PLAN.—Section 1003(a)(2)(A) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 

U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended— 

(1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new clause: 

‘‘(iii) ensuring the audit of the financial statements of 

the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2018 occurs 

by not later than March 31, 2019.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
176 

SEC. 1004. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO SUSTAIN NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION. 

(a) TRANSFER AUTHORIZED.—If the amount authorized to be appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made available 

for fiscal year 2014 is less than $8,400,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal year 2014 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 

2549)), the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 

2014 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary of Energy an amount, 

not to exceed $150,000,000, to be available only for weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration. 

(b) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—In the event of a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify Congress 

of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the Department of 

Defense account or accounts from which funds are transferred. 

(c) TRANSFER MECHANISM.—Any funds transferred under this section shall be transferred in accordance with established procedures 

for reprogramming under section 1001 or successor provisions of 

law. 

(d) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority provided under subsection (a) is in addition to any other transfer authority provided under this Act. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

SEC. 1011. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT UNIFIED 

COUNTER-DRUG AND COUNTERTERRORISM CAMPAIGN IN 

COLOMBIA. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108– 

375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1010 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1907), is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2014’’; 

and 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2014’’. 

(b) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON ASSISTANCE.—Not later than 15 

days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald 

W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 

(as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal year 

2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, 

including the types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the anticipated completion date and duration of the provision of such assistance. 

SEC. 1012. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR JOINT TASK FORCES TO 

PROVIDE SUPPORT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 

CONDUCTING COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTIVITIES. 

Section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1594; 10 U.S.C. 371 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
177 

note), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 

126 Stat. 1907) is amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

SEC. 1013. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE 

ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES 

OF CERTAIN FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 

111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1006 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1557), is further amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

(b) MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF SUPPORT.—Subsection (e)(2) of such 

section 1033, as so amended, is further amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2016’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE SUPPORT.— Subsection (b) of such section 1033, as so amended, is further 

amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(36) Government of Chad. 

‘‘(37) Government of Libya. 

‘‘(38) Government of Mali. 

‘‘(39) Government of Niger.’’. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

SEC. 1021. MODIFICATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL LONGRANGE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL VESSELS. 

(a) ANNUAL NAVAL VESSEL CONSTRUCTION PLAN.—Subsection (b) 

of section 231 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘should be designed’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘shall be designed’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘is capable of supporting’’ both places it 

appears and inserting ‘‘supports’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘and capabilities’’ 

after ‘‘naval vessel force structure’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) The estimated total cost of construction for each vessel 

used to determine estimated levels of annual funding under 

subparagraph (C).’’. 

(b) ASSESSMENT WHEN CONSTRUCTION PLAN DOES NOT MEET

FORCE STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS.—Such section is further amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection (c): 

‘‘(c) ASSESSMENT WHEN ANNUAL NAVAL VESSEL CONSTRUCTION

PLAN DOES NOT MEET FORCE STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS.—If the 

annual naval vessel construction plan for a fiscal year under subsection (b) does not result in a force structure or capabilities that 

meet the requirements identified in subsection (b)(2)(B), the Secretary shall include with the defense budget materials for that fiscal 

year an assessment of the extent of the strategic and operational risk 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
178 

to national security associated with the reduced force structure of 

naval vessels over the period of time that the required force structure or capabilities are not achieved. Such assessment shall include 

an analysis of whether the risks are acceptable, and plans to mitigate such risks. Such assessment shall be coordinated in advance 

with the commanders of the combatant commands and the Nuclear 

Weapons Council under section 179 of this title.’’. 

SEC. 1022. CLARIFICATION OF SOLE OWNERSHIP RESULTING FROM 

SHIP DONATIONS AT NO COST TO THE NAVY. 

(a) CLARIFICATION OF TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of 

section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as 

follows: 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY TO MAKE TRANSFER.—The Secretary of the Navy 

may convey, by donation, all right, title, and interest to any vessel 

stricken from the Naval Vessel Register or any captured vessel, for 

use as a museum or memorial for public display in the United 

States, to— 

‘‘(1) any State, the District of Columbia, any Commonwealth 

or possession of the United States, or any municipal corporation 

or political subdivision thereof; or 

‘‘(2) any nonprofit entity.’’. 

(b) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY AND RESPONSI- BILITY.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY.—(1) The 

United States and all departments and agencies thereof, and their 

officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity for any 

injury or damage to any person or property occurring on a vessel 

donated under this section. 

‘‘(2) Notwithstanding any other law, the Department of Defense, 

and the officers and employees of the Department of Defense, shall 

have no responsibility or obligation to make, engage in, or provide 

funding for, any improvement, upgrade, modification, maintenance, 

preservation, or repair to a vessel donated under this section.’’. 

(c) CLARIFICATION THAT TRANSFERS TO BE MADE AT NO COST TO

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended— 

(A) by inserting after ‘‘under this section’’ the following: 

‘‘, the maintenance and preservation of that vessel as a museum or memorial, and the ultimate disposal of that vessel, 

including demilitarization of Munitions List items at the 

end of the useful life of the vessel as a museum or memorial,’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the United States’’ and inserting ‘‘the Department of Defense’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading for subsection (c) of 

such section is amended by striking ‘‘UNITED STATES’’ and inserting ‘‘DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE’’. 

(d) APPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS; DEFINITIONS.—Such 

section is further amended by adding at the end the following new 

subsections: 

‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.—Nothing in this section shall affect the applicability of Federal, State, interstate, and 

local environmental laws and regulations, including the Toxic SubVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00210 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
179 

stances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) and the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 

(42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), to the Department of Defense or to a donee. 

‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘nonprofit entity’ means any entity qualifying as 

an exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘Munitions List’ means the United States Munitions List created and controlled under section 38 of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778). 

‘‘(3) The term ‘donee’ means any entity receiving a vessel pursuant to subsection (a).’’. 

(e) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— (1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured 

vessels: conveyance by donation’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The item relating to such section in 

the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of such title 

is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘7306. Vessels stricken from Naval Vessel Register; captured vessels: conveyance by 

donation.’ ’’’. 

SEC. 1023. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RETIREMENT OR INACTIVATION OF TICONDEROGA CLASS CRUISERS OR DOCK LANDING SHIPS. 

(a) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Except as provided 

in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing ship. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the funds referred to in such subsection may be obligated or expended to retire 

the U.S.S. Denver, LPD9. 

SEC. 1024. EXTENSION AND REMEDIATION OF NAVY CONTRACTING ACTIONS. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR SHORT-TERM EXTENSION OR RENEWAL OF

LEASES FOR VESSELS SUPPORTING THE TRANSIT PROTECTION SYS- TEM ESCORT PROGRAM.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 2401 of title 10, 

United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may extend or 

renew the lease of not more than four blocking vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program after the 

date of the expiration of the lease of such vessels, as in effect 

on the date of the enactment of this Act. Such an extension 

shall be for a term that is the shorter of— 

(A) the period beginning on the date of the expiration of 

the lease in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 

and ending on the date on which the Secretary determines 

that a substitute is available for the capabilities provided 

by the lease, or that the capabilities provided by the vessel 

are no longer required; or 

(B) 180 days. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
180 

(2) FUNDING.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance, Navy, as 

specified in the funding tables in section 4301, may be available 

for the extension or renewal of a lease under paragraph (1). 

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Prior to extending or renewing a 

lease under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees notification of the 

proposed extension or renewal. Such notification shall include— 

(A) a detailed description of the term of the proposed contract for the extension or renewal of the lease and a justification for extending or renewing the lease rather than 

obtaining the capability provided for by the lease, charter, 

or services involved through purchase of the vessel; and 

(B) a plan for meeting the capability provided for by the 

lease upon the completion of the term of the lease contract, 

as extended or renewed under paragraph (1). 

(b) AUTHORITY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PAYMENT IN KIND IN SETTLE- MENT OF A–12 AIRCRAFT LITIGATION.—Notwithstanding any other 

provision of law, during fiscal year 2014 and any subsequent fiscal 

year, the Secretary of the Navy is authorized to accept and retain 

the following consideration in lieu of a monetary payment for purposes of the settlement of A–12 aircraft litigation arising from the 

default termination of Contract No. N00019-88-C-0050: 

(1) From General Dynamics Corporation, credit in an amount 

not to exceed $198,000,000 toward the design, construction, and 

delivery of the steel deckhouse, hangar, and aft missile launching system for the DDG 1002. 

(2) From the Boeing Company, three EA-18G Growler aircraft, with installed Airborne Electric Attack kits, valued at an 

amount not to exceed $198,000,000, at no cost to the Department of the Navy. 

SEC. 1025. REPORT COMPARING COSTS OF DDG 1000 AND DDG 51 

FLIGHT III SHIPS. 

Not later than March 15, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a report providing 

an updated comparison of the costs and risks of acquiring DDG 

1000 and DDG 51 Flight III vessels equipped for enhanced ballistic 

missile defense capability. The report shall include each of the following: 

(1) An updated estimate of the total cost to develop, procure, 

operate, and support ballistic missile defense capable DDG 

1000 destroyers equipped with the air and missile defense 

radar. 

(2) The estimate of the Secretary of the total cost of the current plan to develop, procure, operate, and support Flight III 

DDG 51 destroyers. 

(3) Details on the assumed ballistic missile defense requirements and construction schedules for both the DDG 1000 and 

DDG 51 Flight III destroyers referred to in paragraphs (1) and 

(2), respectively. 

(4) An updated comparison of the program risks and the resulting ship capabilities in all dimensions (not just ballistic 

missile defense) of the options referred to in paragraphs (1) and 

(2). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
181 

(5) Any other information the Secretary determines appropriate. 

SEC. 1026. REPORT ON NAVAL VESSELS AND THE FORCE STRUCTURE 

ASSESSMENT. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the date of 

the submittal of the annual naval vessel construction plan required 

under section 231 of title 10, United States Code, for fiscal year 

2015, the Chief of Naval Operations shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the current requirements for 

combatant vessels of the Navy and the anticipated requirements for 

such vessels during the 30-year period following the submittal of the 

report. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following: 

(1) A description of the naval capability requirements identified by the combatant commands in developing the Force Structure Assessment in 2005 and revalidating that Assessment in 

2010. 

(2) The capabilities for each class of vessel that was assumed 

in the Force Structure Assessment. 

(3) An assessment of the capabilities of the current fleet of 

combatant vessels of the Navy to meet current and anticipated 

requirements. 

(4) An assessment of how the Navy is currently managing deployment schedules to meet combatant commander requirements with a smaller force than specified in the Force Structure 

Assessment of 2005, including the impact on— 

(A) the material condition of the naval force due to longer 

deployment times; and 

(B) long-term retention rates, especially in critical specialties. 

(5) An assessment of the capabilities of the anticipated fleet 

of combatant vessels of the Navy to meet emerging threats over 

the next 30 years. 

(6) An assessment of how the Navy will meet combatant command requirements for forward-deployed naval capabilities 

with a smaller number of ships and submarines. 

(7) An assessment of how the Navy will manage the risk of 

massing a greater set of capabilities on a smaller number of 

ships while facing an expanding range of asymmetrical threats, 

including— 

(A) anti-access/area-denial capabilities; 

(B) diesel-electric submarines; 

(C) mines; and 

(D) anti-ship cruise and ballistic missiles. 

(8) The assessment of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 

of— 

(A) the operational risk associated with the current and 

the planned number of ships of the amphibious assault 

force, including vessels designated as LHA, LHD, LPD, or 

LSD; and 

(B) the capabilities required to meet the needs of the Marine Corps for future ships of the amphibious assault force. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
182 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

SEC. 1027. MODIFICATION OF POLICY RELATING TO MAJOR COMBATANT VESSELS OF THE STRIKE FORCES OF THE NAVY. 

Section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 7291 note) is amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (a) and redesignating subsections 

(b) and (c) as subsections (a) and (b), respectively; and 

(2) in subsection (a), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the request shall be for’’ and inserting 

‘‘the request shall include a specific assessment of’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘in the analysis of alternatives’’ after 

‘‘nuclear power system’’. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

SEC. 1031. CLARIFICATION OF PROCEDURES FOR USE OF ALTERNATE 

MEMBERS ON MILITARY COMMISSIONS. 

(a) PRIMARY AND ALTERNATE MEMBERS.— 

(1) NUMBER OF MEMBERS.—Subsection (a) of section 948m of 

title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘at least five members’’ and inserting 

‘‘at least five primary members and as many alternate 

members as the convening authority shall detail’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

‘‘Alternate members shall be designated in the order in 

which they will replace an excused primary member.’’; 

and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘primary’’ after ‘‘the 

number of’’. 

(2) GENERAL RULES.—Such section is further amended— 

(A) by redesignating subsection (b) and (c) as subsections 

(d) and (e), respectively; and 

(B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 

subsections (b) and (c): 

‘‘(b) PRIMARY MEMBERS.—Primary members of a military commission under this chapter are voting members. 

‘‘(c) ALTERNATE MEMBERS.—(1) A military commission may include alternate members to replace primary members who are excused from service on the commission. 

‘‘(2) Whenever a primary member is excused from service on the 

commission, an alternate member, if available, shall replace the excused primary member and the trial may proceed.’’. 

(3) EXCUSE OF MEMBERS.—Subsection (d) of such section, as 

redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended— 

(A) in the matter before paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘primary or alternate’’ before ‘‘member’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (2); 

(C) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and 

inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
183 

‘‘(4) in the case of an alternate member, in order to reduce the 

number of alternate members required for service on the commission, as determined by the convening authority.’’. 

(4) ABSENT AND ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.—Subsection (e) of 

such section, as redesignated by paragraph (2)(A), is amended— 

(A) in the first sentence— 

(i) by inserting ‘‘the number of primary members of’’ 

after ‘‘Whenever’’; 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘primary’’ before ‘‘members required 

by’’; and 

(iii) by inserting ‘‘and there are no remaining alternate members to replace the excused primary members’’ 

after ‘‘subsection (a)’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘An 

alternate member who was present for the introduction of 

all evidence shall not be considered to be a new or additional member.’’. 

(b) CHALLENGES.—Section 949f of such title is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘primary or alternate’’ before ‘‘members’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following new 

sentence: ‘‘Nothing in this section prohibits the military judge 

from awarding to each party such additional peremptory challenges as may be required in the interests of justice.’’. 

(c) NUMBER OF VOTES REQUIRED.—Section 949m of such title is 

amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘primary’’ before ‘‘members’’ each place it appears; and 

(2) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following new 

paragraph: 

‘‘(4) The primary members present for a vote on a sentence need 

not be the same primary members who voted on the conviction if the 

requirements of section 948m(d) of this title are met.’’. 

SEC. 1032. MODIFICATION OF REGIONAL DEFENSE COMBATING TERRORISM FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2249c(c) of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘, including engagement activities for program alumni,’’ after ‘‘subsection (a)’’; 

(2) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ‘‘program’’ the following: ‘‘, including a list of any unfunded or unmet training 

requirements and requests’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(5) A discussion and justification of how the program fits 

within the theater security priorities of each of the commanders 

of the geographic combatant commands.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 

shall apply with respect to a report submitted for a fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
184 

SEC. 1033. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CONSTRUCT OR MODIFY FACILITIES IN THE UNITED STATES TO HOUSE DETAINEES TRANSFERRED FROM UNITED STATES NAVAL 

STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated or 

otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used 

during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act 

and ending on December 31, 2014, to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any 

individual detained at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or 

imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department 

of Defense unless authorized by Congress. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply 

to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, 

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

(c) INDIVIDUAL DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ has the meaning given that term in section 1035(e)(2). 

SEC. 1034. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FUNDS FOR THE TRANSFER 

OR RELEASE OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED 

STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 

available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 

on December 31, 2014, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer 

or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who— 

(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed 

Forces of the United States; and 

(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense. 

SEC. 1035. TRANSFERS TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.— 

The Secretary of Defense is authorized to transfer or release any individual detained at Guantanamo to the individual’s country of origin, or any other foreign country, if— 

(1) the Secretary determines, following a review conducted in 

accordance with the requirements of section 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 

U.S.C. 801 note) and Executive Order No. 13567, that the individual is no longer a threat to the national security of the 

United States; or 

(2) such transfer or release outside the United States is to effectuate an order affecting disposition of the individual by a 

court or competent tribunal of the United States having jurisdiction. 

(b) DETERMINATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO TRANSFER.—Except as 

provided in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may transfer an 

individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the 

individual’s country origin, or any other foreign country, only if the 

Secretary determines that— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
185 

(1) actions that have been or are planned to be taken will substantially mitigate the risk of such individual engaging or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile activity that threatens 

the United States or United States persons or interests; and 

(2) the transfer is in the national security interest of the 

United States. 

(c) FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN MAKING DETERMINATION.—In 

making the determination specified in subsection (b), the Secretary 

of Defense shall specifically evaluate and take into consideration the 

following factors: 

(1) The recommendations of the Guantanamo Detainee Review Task Force established pursuant to Executive Order No. 

13492 and the recommendations of the Periodic Review Boards 

established pursuant to No. Executive Order 13567, as applicable. 

(2) The security situation in the foreign country to which the 

individual is to be transferred, including whether or not the 

country is a state sponsor of terrorism, the presence of foreign 

terrorist groups, and the threat posed by such groups to the 

United States. 

(3) Any confirmed case in which an individual transferred to 

the foreign country to which the individual is to be transferred 

subsequently engaged in terrorist or other hostile activity that 

threatened the United States or United States persons or interests. 

(4) Any actions taken by the United States or the foreign 

country to which the individual is to be transferred, or change 

in circumstances in such country, that reduce the risk of reengagement of the type described in paragraph (3). 

(5) Any assurances provided by the government of the foreign 

country to which the individual is to be transferred, including 

that— 

(A) such government maintains control over any facility 

at which the individual is to be detained if the individual 

is to be housed in a government-controlled facility; and 

(B) such government has taken or agreed to take actions 

to substantially mitigate the risk of the individual engaging 

or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile activity that 

threatens the United States or United States persons or interests. 

(6) An assessment of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country described in paragraph (5) in meeting any assurances it has provided, including 

assurances under paragraph (5) regarding its capacity and 

willingness to mitigate the risk of reengagement. 

(7) Any record of cooperation by the individual to be transferred with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense, and any agreements and effective mechanisms that may 

be in place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
186 

(8) In the case of an individual who has been tried in a court 

or competent tribunal of the United States having jurisdiction 

on charges based on the same conduct that serves as a basis for 

the determination that the individual is an enemy combatant, 

whether or not the individual has been acquitted of such 

charges or has been convicted and has completed serving the 

sentence pursuant to the conviction. 

(d) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress of a determination of the Secretary 

under subsection (a) or (b) not later than 30 days before the transfer 

or release of the individual under such subsection. Each notification 

shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) A detailed statement of the basis for the transfer or release. 

(2) An explanation of why the transfer or release is in the national security interests of the United States. 

(3) A description of any actions taken to mitigate the risks of 

reengagement by the individual to be transferred or released, 

including any actions taken to address factors relevant to a 

prior case of reengagement described in subsection (c)(3). 

(4) A copy of any Periodic Review Board findings relating to 

the individual. 

(5) A description of the evaluation conducted pursuant to subsection (c), including a summary of the assessment required by 

paragraph (6) of such subsection. 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and 

the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the 

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 

Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ means 

any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who— 

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of 

the Armed Forces of the United States; and 

(B) is— 

(i) in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or 

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval 

Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

(f) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITIES.—The following provisions of law are repealed: 

(1) Section 1028 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1567; 10 

U.S.C. 801 note). 

(2) Section 1028 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1914; 10 

U.S.C. 801 note). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
187 

SEC. 1036. REPORT ON INFORMATION RELATING TO INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT PARWAN, AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) CLASSIFIED REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a classified report on information relating to the individuals detained by the Department of 

Defense at the Detention Facility at Parwan, Afghanistan, pursuant 

to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 

50 U.S.C. 1541 note) who have been determined to represent an enduring security threat to the United States. Such report shall cover 

any individual detained at such facility as of the date of the enactment of this Act. Such report shall include for each such covered individual— 

(1) a description of the relevant organization or organizations 

with which the individual is affiliated; 

(2) whether the individual had ever been in the custody or 

under the effective control of the United States at any time before being detained at such facility and, if so, where the individual had been in such custody or under such effective control; 

and 

(3) whether the individual has been directly linked to the 

death of any member of the United States Armed Forces or any 

United States Government employee. 

(b) DECLASSIFICATION REVIEW.—Upon submittal of the classified 

report required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall 

conduct a declassification review of such report to determine what 

information, if any, may be made publicly available in an unclassified summary of the information contained in the report. In conducting such declassification review, the Secretary shall make such 

summary information publicly available to the maximum extent 

practicable, consistent with national security. 

SEC. 1037. GRADE OF CHIEF PROSECUTOR AND CHIEF DEFENSE COUNSEL IN MILITARY COMMISSIONS ESTABLISHED TO TRY INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of any military commission established under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to try an 

alien unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms are defined in 

section 948a of such title) who is detained at United States Naval 

Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the chief defense counsel and the 

chief prosecutor shall have the same grade (as that term is defined 

in section 101(b)(7) of such title). 

(b) WAIVER.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may temporarily 

waive the requirement specified in subsection (a), if the Secretary determines that compliance with such subsection 

would— 

(A) be infeasible due to a non-availability of qualified officers of the same grade to fill the billets of chief defense 

counsel and chief prosecutor; or 

(B) cause a significant disruption to proceedings established under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code. 

(2) REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after the Secretary 

issues a waiver under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
188 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives the following: 

(A) A copy of the waiver and the determination of the 

Secretary to issue the waiver. 

(B) A statement of the basis for the determination, including an explanation of the non-availability of qualified 

officers or the significant disruption concerned. 

(C) Notice of the time period during which the waiver is 

in effect. 

(c) GUIDANCE.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to ensure that the office of the chief defense counsel and the office of the 

chief prosecutor receive equitable resources, personnel support, and 

logistical support for conducting their respective duties in connection with any military commission established under chapter 47A of 

title 10, United States Code, to try an alien unprivileged enemy belligerent (as such terms are defined in section 948a of such title) who 

is detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba. 

SEC. 1038. REPORT ON CAPABILITY OF YEMENI GOVERNMENT TO DETAIN, REHABILITATE, AND PROSECUTE INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO WHO ARE TRANSFERRED TO 

YEMEN. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of State shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, 

and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on 

the capability of the government of Yemen to detain, rehabilitate, 

and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are transferred to Yemen. Such report shall include an assessment of any humanitarian issues that may be encountered in transferring individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen. 

(b) INDIVIDUAL DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘individual detained at Guantanamo’’ has the meaning given such term in section 1035(e)(2). 

SEC. 1039. REPORT ON ATTACHMENT OF RIGHTS TO INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT GUANTANAMO IF TRANSFERRED TO THE 

UNITED STATES. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report on 

the legal rights, if any, for which an individual detained at Guantanamo (as such term is defined in section 1035(e)(2)), if transferred 

to the United States, may become eligible, by reason of such transfer. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection (a) 

shall include each of the following: 

(1) An assessment of the extent to which an individual detained at Guantanamo, if transferred to the United States, 

could become eligible, by reason of such transfer, for— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
189 

(A) relief from removal from the United States, including 

pursuant to the Convention against Torture and Other 

Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; 

(B) any required release from immigration detention, including pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court in 

Zadvydas v. Davis; 

(C) asylum or withholding of removal; or 

(D) any additional constitutional right. 

(2) For any right referred to in paragraph (1) for which the 

Attorney General determine such an individual could become eligible if so transferred, a description of the reasoning behind 

such determination and an explanation of the nature of the 

right. 

(3) An analysis of the extent to which legislation or other 

steps could address any legal rights described in paragraph (1). 

Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations 

SEC. 1041. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE MILITARY 

OPERATIONS. 

(a) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 130f. Congressional notification of sensitive military operations 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall promptly submit to the congressional defense committees notice in writing of any 

sensitive military operation conducted under this title following 

such operation. Department of Defense support to operations conducted under the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et 

seq.) is addressed in the classified annex prepared to accompany the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. 

‘‘(b) PROCEDURES.—(1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish 

and submit to the congressional defense committees procedures for 

complying with the requirements of subsection (a) consistent with 

the national security of the United States and the protection of operational integrity. 

‘‘(2) The congressional defense committees shall ensure that committee procedures designed to protect from unauthorized disclosure 

classified information relating to national security of the United 

States are sufficient to protect the information that is submitted to 

the committees pursuant to this section. 

‘‘(c) BRIEFING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall periodically brief the congressional defense committees on Department 

of Defense personnel and equipment assigned to sensitive military 

operations. 

‘‘(d) SENSITIVE MILITARY OPERATION DEFINED.—The term ‘sensitive military operation’ means a lethal operation or capture operation conducted by the armed forces outside the United States and 

outside a theater of major hostilities pursuant to— 

‘‘(1) the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 

107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note); or 

‘‘(2) any other authority except— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
190 

‘‘(A) a declaration of war; or 

‘‘(B) a specific statutory authorization for the use of force 

other than the authorization referred to in paragraph (1). 

‘‘(e) EXCEPTION.—The notification requirement under subsection 

(a) shall not apply with respect to a sensitive military operation executed within the territory of Afghanistan pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 

note). 

‘‘(f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to provide any new authority or to alter or otherwise affect the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.), the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 

1541 note), or any requirement under the National Security Act of 

1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 130e the following new item: 

‘‘130f. Congressional notification regarding sensitive military operations.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 130f of title 10, United States 

Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to any 

sensitive military operation (as defined in subsection (d) of such section) executed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(c) DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL OF PROCEDURES.—The Secretary of 

Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the 

procedures required under section 130f(b) of title 10, United States 

Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later than 60 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 1042. COUNTERTERRORISM OPERATIONAL BRIEFINGS. 

(a) BRIEFINGS REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 484 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 485. Quarterly counterterrorism operations briefings 

‘‘(a) BRIEFINGS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly briefings outlining Department of Defense counterterrorism operations and related activities. 

‘‘(b) ELEMENTS.—Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include 

each of the following: 

‘‘(1) A global update on activity within each geographic combatant command and how such activity supports the respective 

theater campaign plan. 

‘‘(2) An overview of authorities and legal issues, including 

limitations. 

‘‘(3) An overview of interagency activities and initiatives. 

‘‘(4) Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 484 the following new item: 

‘‘485. Quarterly counterterrorism operations briefings.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
191 

(b) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1031 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1570; 10 U.S.C. 167 note) is hereby repealed. 

SEC. 1043. REPORT ON PROCESS FOR DETERMINING TARGETS OF LETHAL OR CAPTURE OPERATIONS. 

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report containing an explanation of the legal and policy considerations and approval processes used in determining 

whether an individual or group of individuals could be the target 

of a lethal operation or capture operation conducted by the Armed 

Forces of the United States outside the United States and outside 

of Afghanistan. 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces 

SEC. 1051. NOTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR REDUCTION OR CONSOLIDATION OF DUAL-CAPABLE AIRCRAFT BASED IN EUROPE. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the 

President should not reduce or consolidate the basing of dual-capable aircraft of the United States that are based in Europe unless— 

(1) the President takes into account whether the Russian Federation has carried out similar reductions or consolidations 

with respect to dual-capable aircraft of Russia; 

(2) the Secretary of Defense has consulted with the member 

states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) with 

respect to the planned reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft of the United States; and 

(3) there is a consensus among such member states that the 

nuclear posture of NATO is not adversely affected by such reduction or consolidation. 

(b) NOTIFICATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 24 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 497 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 497a. Notification required for reduction or consolidation 

of dual-capable aircraft based in Europe 

‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION.—Not less than 90 days before the date on 

which the Secretary of Defense reduces or consolidates the dual-capable aircraft of the United States that are based in Europe, the 

Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notification of such planned reduction or consolidation, including the 

following: 

‘‘(1) The reasons for such planned reduction or consolidation. 

‘‘(2) Any effects of such planned reduction or consolidation on 

the extended deterrence mission of the United States. 

‘‘(3) The manner in which the military requirements of the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) will continue to be 

met in light of such planned reduction or consolidation. 

‘‘(4) A statement by the Secretary on the response of NATO to 

such planned reduction or consolidation. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
192 

‘‘(5) Whether there is any change in the force posture of the 

Russian Federation as a result of such planned reduction or 

consolidation, including with respect to the nonstrategic nuclear 

weapons of Russia that are within range of the member states 

of NATO. 

‘‘(b) DUAL-CAPABLE AIRCRAFT DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘dual-capable aircraft’ means aircraft that can perform both conventional and nuclear missions.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 497 the following new item: 

‘‘497a. Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable aircraft 

based in Europe.’’. 

SEC. 1052. COUNCIL ON OVERSIGHT OF THE NATIONAL LEADERSHIP 

COMMAND, CONTROL, AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 171 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 171a. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership 

Command, Control, and Communications System 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is within the Department of Defense 

a council to be known as the ‘Council on Oversight of the National 

Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System’ (in 

this section referred to as the ‘Council’). 

‘‘(b) MEMBERSHIP.—The members of the Council shall be as follows: 

‘‘(1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. 

‘‘(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 

‘‘(3) The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(4) The Commander of the United States Strategic Command. 

‘‘(5) The Director of the National Security Agency. 

‘‘(6) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(7) Such other officers of the Department of Defense as the 

Secretary may designate. 

‘‘(c) CO-CHAIR.—The Council shall be co-chaired by the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and 

the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(d) RESPONSIBILITIES.—(1) The Council shall be responsible for 

oversight of the command, control, and communications system for 

the national leadership of the United States, including nuclear command, control, and communications. 

‘‘(2) In carrying out the responsibility for oversight of the command, control, and communications system as specified in paragraph (1), the Council shall be responsible for the following: 

‘‘(A) Oversight of performance assessments (including interoperability). 

‘‘(B) Vulnerability identification and mitigation. 

‘‘(C) Architecture development. 

‘‘(D) Resource prioritization. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
193 

‘‘(E) Such other responsibilities as the Secretary of Defense 

shall specify for purposes of this section. 

‘‘(e) ANNUAL REPORTS.—At the same time each year that the 

budget of the President is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 

1105(a) of title 31, the Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities of the Council. Each report shall include the following: 

‘‘(1) A description and assessment of the activities of the 

Council during the previous fiscal year. 

‘‘(2) A description of the activities proposed to be undertaken 

by the Council during the period covered by the current futureyears defense program under section 221 of this title. 

‘‘(3) Any changes to the requirements of the command, control, and communications system for the national leadership of 

the United States made during the previous year, along with an 

explanation for why the changes were made and a description 

of the effects of the changes to the capability of the system. 

‘‘(4) A breakdown of each program element in such budget 

that relates to the system, including how such program element 

relates to the operation and sustainment, research and development, procurement, or other activity of the system. 

‘‘(f) BUDGET AND FUNDING MATTERS.—(1) Not later than 30 days 

after the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year 

under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the United 

States Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment of— 

‘‘(A) whether such budget allows the Federal Government to 

meet the required capabilities of the command, control, and 

communications system for the national leadership of the 

United States during the fiscal year covered by the budget and 

the four subsequent fiscal years; and 

‘‘(B) if the Commander determines that such budget does not 

allow the Federal Government to meet such required capabilities, a description of the steps being taken to meet such required 

capabilities. 

‘‘(2) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Chairman 

of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assessment of the Commander of the United States Strategic Command under paragraph 

(1), the Chairman shall submit to the congressional defense committees— 

‘‘(A) such assessment as it was submitted to the Chairman; 

and 

‘‘(B) any comments of the Chairman. 

‘‘(3) If a House of Congress adopts a bill authorizing or appropriating funds for the activities of the command, control, and communications system for the national leadership of the United States 

that, as determined by the Council, provides insufficient funds for 

such activities for the period covered by such bill, the Council shall 

notify the congressional defense committees of the determination. 

‘‘(g) NOTIFICATION OF ANOMALIES.—(1) The Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notification of an anomaly in the nuclear command, control, and communications system for the national leadership of the United States 

that is reported to the Secretary or the Council by not later than 14 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
194 

days after the date on which the Secretary or the Council learns of 

such anomaly, as the case may be. 

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘anomaly’ means any unplanned, 

irregular, or abnormal event, whether unexplained or caused intentionally or unintentionally by a person or a system. 

‘‘(h) NATIONAL LEADERSHIP OF THE UNITED STATES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘national leadership of the United States’ 

means the following: 

‘‘(1) The President. 

‘‘(2) The Vice President. 

‘‘(3) Such other civilian officials of the United States Government as the President shall designate for purposes of this section.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 of such title is amended by inserting after 

the item relating to section 171 the following new item: 

‘‘171a. Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and 

Communications System.’’. 

(3) REPORT ON ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 60 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, 

Control, and Communications System established by section 

171a of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), 

including the following: 

(A) The charter and organizational structure of the Council. 

(B) Such recommendations for legislative action as the 

Secretary considers appropriate to improve the authorities 

relating to the Council. 

(C) A funding plan over the period of the current futureyears defense program under section 221 of title 10, United 

States Code, to ensure a robust and modern nuclear command, control, and communications capability. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 491 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (c); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c). 

SEC. 1053. MODIFICATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS COUNCIL. 

(a) RESPONSIBILITIES.—Subsection (d) of section 179 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking paragraph (10); and 

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (11) and (12) as paragraphs 

(10) and (11), respectively. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended 

by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(6) A description and assessment of the joint efforts of the 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy to develop 

common security practices that improve the security of the nuclear weapons and facilities of the Department of Defense and 

the Department of Energy.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
195 

(c) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Such subsection (g) is further 

amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘on the 

following’’ and inserting ‘‘that includes the following’’. 

SEC. 1054. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINE FOR REPORT ON PLAN FOR 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE, NUCLEAR WEAPONS 

COMPLEX, NUCLEAR WEAPONS DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM. 

Section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576) is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘ON THE PLAN’’ and 

all that follows through ‘‘CONTROL SYSTEM’’ and inserting ‘‘REQUIRED’’; 

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Together with the budget of 

the President submitted to Congress’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later 

than 30 days after the submission to Congress of the budget of 

the President’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(4) EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR REPORT.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), if the 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy jointly determine that a report required by paragraph (1) for a fiscal 

year will not be able to be transmitted to the committees 

specified in that paragraph by the time required under that 

paragraph, such Secretaries shall— 

‘‘(i) promptly, and before the submission to Congress 

of the budget of the President for that fiscal year under 

section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, notify 

those committees of the expected date for the transmission of the report; and 

‘‘(ii) not later than 30 days after the submission of 

that budget to Congress, provide a briefing to those 

committees on the content of the report. 

‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—In no case may the President transmit 

a report required by paragraph (1) for a fiscal year to the 

committees specified in that paragraph later than 60 days 

after the submission to Congress of the budget of the President for that fiscal year.’’. 

SEC. 1055. PROHIBITION ON ELIMINATION OF NUCLEAR TRIAD. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 

for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to reduce, convert, or decommission any strategic delivery system if such 

reduction, conversion, or decommissioning would eliminate a leg of 

the nuclear triad. 

(b) NUCLEAR TRIAD DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘nuclear 

triad’’ means the nuclear deterrent capabilities of the United States 

composed of the following: 

(1) Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles. 

(2) Submarine-launched ballistic missiles and associated ballistic missile submarines. 

(3) Nuclear-certified strategic bombers. 

SEC. 1056. IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW START TREATY. 

(a) IMPLEMENTATION.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
196 

(1) FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACTIVITIES.—With respect to reductions 

to the nuclear forces of the United States necessary to meet the 

New START Treaty levels, the Secretary of Defense may only 

use funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 

made available for fiscal year 2014 to carry out activities to 

prepare for such reductions. Subject to the limitation in subsection (b), such activities may include the preparation of any 

documents needed to support an environmental assessment 

process under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) that may be required to support such 

reductions. 

(2) CONSOLIDATED BUDGET DISPLAY.—The Secretary shall include with the defense budget materials for each fiscal year 

specified in paragraph (3) a consolidated budget justification 

display that individually covers each program and activity associated with the implementation of the New START Treaty for 

the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, at or 

about the time as such defense budget materials are submitted. 

(3) FISCAL YEAR SPECIFIED.—A fiscal year specified in this 

paragraph is each fiscal year that occurs during the period beginning with fiscal year 2015 and ending on the date on which 

the New START Treaty is no longer in force. 

(b) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for environmental assessment activities to support reductions to the nuclear 

forces of the United States, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until— 

(1) the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress the plan required by subsection (a) of section 1042 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1575), including a description of various options for the 

nuclear force structure of the United States under the New 

START Treaty, including the preferred force structure option of 

the Secretary (such plan and options may be subject to modification based on the results of the environmental assessment 

and other subsequent developments); 

(2) the Commander of the United States Strategic Command 

submits to the congressional defense committees a report providing the assessment of the Commander with respect to the options contained in the plan described in paragraph (1), including the preferred force structure option of the Secretary; and 

(3) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certifies to the 

congressional defense committees that conducting such environmental assessment activities will not imperil the ability of the 

military to comply with the New START Treaty levels by February 2018. 

(c) MODIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF B–52 AIRCRAFT.— 

(1) COMMON CONVENTIONAL CAPABILITY CONFIGURATION.— Subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 131 of the John Warner National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 

109–364; 120 Stat. 2111), as added by section 137(a)(1)(C) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
197 

(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 32), is amended by striking 

‘‘common capability configuration’’ and inserting ‘‘common conventional capability configuration’’. 

(2) CONVERSION.—Notwithstanding such section 131 or any 

other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may not convert 

a B–52 aircraft described in subsection (a)(1)(C) of such section 

131 to a configuration that does not allow the aircraft to perform nuclear missions unless the Secretary has submitted to 

Congress the information required under subsection (b). 

(d) REPORT ON COLLABORATION AMONG THE STRATEGIC FORCES

OF THE ARMED FORCES.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on collaboration among the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force on activities related to strategic systems to provide efficiencies, improve 

technology sharing, and yield other potential benefits. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include 

the following: 

(A) A description of current collaboration among the 

Army, the Navy, and the Air Force on strategic system programs, including strategic missiles systems, conventional 

prompt global strike, and other strategic forces as the Secretary determines appropriate. 

(B) A description and assessment of any additional opportunities for such collaboration, including the benefits 

that may be realized by such efforts, the risks and costs to 

existing programs, and potential effects on the defense industrial base that supports strategic systems. 

(e) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the successful implementation of the New START Treaty 

requires the partnership of the President and Congress; 

(2) the force structure required by the New START Treaty 

should preserve Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile 

silos that contain a deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act in, at a minimum, a warm status that enables 

such silo to be made fully operational with a deployed missile 

and remain a fully functioning element of the interconnected 

and redundant command and control system of the missile 

field; and 

(3) the distribution of any such warm-status silos should not 

disproportionally affect the force structure of any one operational intercontinental ballistic missile wing. 

(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘defense budget materials’’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 231(f) of title 10, United States Code. 

(2) The term ‘‘New START Treaty’’ means the Treaty between 

the United States of America and the Russian Federation on 

Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic 

Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, and entered into force 

on February 5, 2011. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
198 

SEC. 1057. RETENTION OF CAPABILITY TO REDEPLOY MULTIPLE INDEPENDENTLY TARGETABLE REENTRY VEHICLES. 

(a) DEPLOYMENT CAPABILITY.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

shall ensure that the Air Force is capable of— 

(1) deploying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles; and 

(2) commencing such deployment not later than 180 days 

after the date on which the President determines such deployment necessary. 

(b) WARHEAD CAPABILITY.—The Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall ensure 

that— 

(1) the nuclear weapons stockpile contains a sufficient number of nuclear warheads that are capable of being deployed as 

multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles with respect 

to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles; and 

(2) such deployment is capable of being commenced not later 

than 180 days after the date on which the President determines 

such deployment necessary. 

SEC. 1058. REPORT ON NEW START TREATY. 

Not later than January 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense and the 

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the 

congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on whether the New START Treaty 

(as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D)(ii) of title 10, United States Code) 

is in the national security interests of the United States. 

SEC. 1059. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS 

OF THE PALOMARES NUCLEAR WEAPONS ACCIDENT REVISED DOSE EVALUATION REPORT. 

Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the recommendations of the 

Palomares Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report released by the Air Force in April 2001. 

SEC. 1060. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON FURTHER STRATEGIC NUCLEAR 

ARMS REDUCTIONS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—It is the sense of Congress that, if the United 

States seeks further strategic nuclear arms reductions with the Russian Federation that are below the levels of the New START Treaty, 

such reductions should— 

(1) be pursued through a mutually negotiated agreement with 

Russia; 

(2) be verifiable; 

(3) be made pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President as set forth in Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution; and 

(4) take into account the full range of nuclear weapon capabilities that threaten the United States and the forward-deployed forces and allies of the United States, including such capabilities relating to nonstrategic nuclear weapons. 

(b) NEW START TREATY DEFINED.—The term ‘‘New START Treaty’’ means the Treaty between the United States of America and the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
199 

Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and 

Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, signed on April 8, 2010, 

and entered into force on February 5, 2011. 

SEC. 1061. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMPLIANCE WITH NUCLEAR 

ARMS CONTROL TREATY OBLIGATIONS. 

It is the sense of Congress that, if the President determines that 

a foreign nation is in substantial noncompliance with its obligations 

under a nuclear arms control treaty to which the United States is 

a party in a manner that adversely affects the national security of 

the United States or its allies or alliances, the President should— 

(1) conduct an assessment of the effect of such noncompliance 

on the national security interests of the United States and its 

allies; 

(2) determine what further actions are warranted by the 

United States in response to such noncompliance; 

(3) determine whether such noncompliance threatens the viability of such treaty; 

(4) take appropriate steps to resolve the noncompliance issue; 

(5) keep Congress informed of developments relating to such 

noncompliance issue; 

(6) inform Congress of the assessment and plan of the President to resolve such noncompliance issue, including any plans 

to address the issue diplomatically with the government of the 

noncompliant nation and the affected allies and alliances; 

(7) consider if the United States should, in light of such noncompliance, engage in future nuclear arms control negotiations 

with the government of the noncompliant nation; and 

(8) consider the potential effect of such noncompliance on the 

consideration by the Senate of a future nuclear arms reduction 

treaty involving the government of the noncompliant nation. 

SEC. 1062. SENSES OF CONGRESS ON ENSURING THE MODERNIZATION 

OF THE NUCLEAR FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES. 

(a) POLICY.—It is the policy of the United States to— 

(1) modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear delivery 

systems; 

(2) proceed with a robust stockpile stewardship program; 

(3) maintain and modernize the nuclear weapons production 

capabilities that will ensure the safety, security, reliability, and 

performance of the nuclear forces of the United States at the 

levels required by the New START Treaty; and 

(4) underpin deterrence by meeting the requirements for hedging against possible international developments or technical 

problems, in accordance with the policies of the United States. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MODERNIZATION OF NUCLEAR

FORCES.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) Congress is committed to providing the resources needed 

to achieve the objectives stated in subsection (a) at a minimum 

at the level set forth in the 10-year plan provided to Congress 

on an annual basis pursuant to section 1043 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 

112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), as amended; 

(2) Congress supports the modernization or replacement of the 

triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems consisting of— 

(A) a heavy bomber and air-launched cruise missile; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
200 

(B) an intercontinental ballistic missile; and 

(C) a ballistic missile submarine and submarinelaunched ballistic missile; and 

(3) the President and Congress should work together to meet 

the objectives stated in subsection (a) in the most cost-efficient 

manner possible. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON LONG-RANGE STRIKE BOMBER AIRCRAFT.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) advancements in air-to-air and surface-to-air weapons 

systems by foreign powers will require increasingly sophisticated long-range strike capabilities; 

(2) upgrading the existing bomber aircraft fleet of the United 

States consisting of B–1B, B–2, and B–52 bomber aircraft must 

remain a high budget priority in order to maintain the combat 

effectiveness of such fleet; and 

(3) the Air Force should continue to prioritize development 

and acquisition of the long-range strike bomber program. 

Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and 

Limitations 

SEC. 1071. ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO ANALYZE CAPTURED RECORDS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by inserting after section 426 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 427. Conflict Records Research Center 

‘‘(a) CENTER AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Defense may establish a center to be known as the ‘Conflict Records Research Center’ 

(in this section referred to as the ‘Center’). 

‘‘(b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the Center shall be the following: 

‘‘(1) To establish a digital research database, including translations, and to facilitate research and analysis of records captured from countries, organizations, and individuals, now or 

once hostile to the United States, with rigid adherence to academic freedom and integrity. 

‘‘(2) Consistent with the protection of national security information, personally identifiable information, and intelligence 

sources and methods, to make a significant portion of these 

records available to researchers as quickly and responsibly as 

possible while taking into account the integrity of the academic 

process and risks to innocents or third parties. 

‘‘(3) To conduct and disseminate research and analysis to increase the understanding of factors related to international relations, counterterrorism, and conventional and unconventional 

warfare and, ultimately, enhance national security. 

‘‘(4) To collaborate with members of academic and broad national security communities, both domestic and international, 

on research, conferences, seminars, and other information exchanges to identify topics of importance for the leadership of the 

United States Government and the scholarly community. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
201 

‘‘(c) CONCURRENCE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall seek the concurrence of the 

Director of National Intelligence to the extent the efforts and activities of the Center involve the entities referred to in subsection (b)(4). 

‘‘(d) SUPPORT FROM OTHER UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS OR AGENCIES.—The head of any non-Department of Defense department or agency of the United States Government may— 

‘‘(1) provide to the Secretary of Defense services, including 

personnel support, to support the operations of the Center; and 

‘‘(2) transfer funds to the Secretary of Defense to support the 

operations of the Center. 

‘‘(e) ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS AND DONATIONS.—(1) Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may accept from any source specified in paragraph (2) any gift or donation for purposes of defraying 

the costs or enhancing the operations of the Center. 

‘‘(2) The sources specified in this paragraph are the following: 

‘‘(A) The government of a State or a political subdivision of 

a State. 

‘‘(B) The government of a foreign country. 

‘‘(C) A foundation or other charitable organization, including 

a foundation or charitable organization that is organized or operates under the laws of a foreign country. 

‘‘(D) Any source in the private sector of the United States or 

a foreign country. 

‘‘(3) The Secretary may not accept a gift or donation under this 

subsection if acceptance of the gift or donation would compromise 

or appear to compromise— 

‘‘(A) the ability of the Department of Defense, any employee of 

the Department, or any member of the armed forces to carry out 

the responsibility or duty of the Department in a fair and objective manner; or 

‘‘(B) the integrity of any program of the Department or of any 

person involved in such a program. 

‘‘(4) The Secretary shall provide written guidance setting forth the 

criteria to be used in determining the applicability of paragraph (3) 

to any proposed gift or donation under this subsection. 

‘‘(f) CREDITING OF FUNDS TRANSFERRED OR ACCEPTED.—Funds 

transferred to or accepted by the Secretary of Defense under this section shall be credited to appropriations available to the Department 

of Defense for the Center, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as the appropriations with which merged. Any funds so transferred or accepted shall remain available until expended. 

‘‘(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘captured record’ means a document, audio file, 

video file, or other material captured during combat operations 

from countries, organizations, or individuals, now or once hostile to the United States. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘gift or donation’ means any gift or donation of 

funds, materials (including research materials), real or personal property, or services (including lecture services and faculty services).’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
202 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of subchapter I of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 

item relating to section 426 the following new item: 

‘‘427. Conflict Records Research Center.’’. 

SEC. 1072. STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 488 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘other year, and in time for submission to 

Congress under subsection (b),’’ and inserting ‘‘three years’’; 

(B) by inserting after ‘‘Secretary of Defense’’ the following: 

‘‘, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence 

and the Secretary of Commerce,’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘the mission of the Department of Defense.’’ and inserting ‘‘the national security of the United 

States. Each such strategic plan shall include each of the 

following:’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(1) An inventory of the uses of the electromagnetic spectrum 

for national security purposes and other purposes. 

‘‘(2) An estimate of the need for electromagnetic spectrum for 

national security and other purposes over each of the periods 

specified in subsection (b). 

‘‘(3) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce, considers appropriate for the strategic 

plan.’’; 

(2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c) and inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) PERIODS COVERED BY STRATEGIC PLAN.—Each strategic plan 

prepared under subsection (a) shall cover each of the following periods (counting from the date of the issuance of the plan): 

‘‘(1) Zero to five years. 

‘‘(2) Five to ten years. 

‘‘(3) Ten to thirty years.’’; 

(3) in subsection (c), as so redesignated— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) The 

Secretary’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) Each strategic plan submitted under paragraph (1) shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified 

annex.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(1) HEADING.—The section heading for section 488 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘: biennial strategic plan’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 488 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘488. Management of electromagnetic spectrum.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
203 

SEC. 1073. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE MILITARY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TO CERTAIN OTHER AGENCIES AT 

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REIMBURSEMENT RATE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 2642 of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘airlift’’ each place it appears and inserting 

‘‘transportation’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘October 28, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2019’’; 

(B) by inserting and ‘‘military transportation services 

provided in support of foreign military sales’’ after ‘‘Department of Defense’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘air industry’’ and inserting ‘‘transportation industry’’. 

(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading for such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘Airlift’’ and inserting ‘‘Transportation’’. 

(c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of chapter 157 of such title is amended by striking the item relating 

to section 2642 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘2642. Transportation services provided to certain other agencies: use of Department 

of Defense reimbursement rates.’’. 

SEC. 1074. NOTIFICATION OF MODIFICATIONS TO ARMY FORCE STRUCTURE. 

(a) CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary of the Army shall certify to the congressional defense committees that Army force structure modifications, reductions, and additions authorized as of the date of the enactment of this Act that will 

utilize funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 

made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of the Army 

are compliant with the provisions of the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

(b) NOTIFICATION OF NECESSARY ASSESSMENTS OR STUDIES.—The 

Secretary of the Army, when making a congressional notification in 

accordance with section 993 of title 10, United States Code, shall include the Secretary’s assessment of whether or not the changes covered by the notification require an Environmental Assessment or 

Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and, if 

an assessment or study is required, the plan for conducting such assessment or study. 

SEC. 1075. AIRCRAFT JOINT TRAINING. 

(a) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT JOINT TRAINING AND USAGE PLAN.— 

(1) METHODS.—The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of 

Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly develop and implement plans 

and procedures to review the potential of joint testing and evaluation of unmanned aircraft equipment and systems with other 

appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government that may serve the dual purpose of providing capabilities 

to the Department of Defense to meet the future requirements of 

combatant commanders and domestically to strengthen international border security. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
204 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of 

Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall jointly submit to Congress a report on 

the status of the development of the plans and procedures required under paragraph (1), including a cost-benefit analysis of 

the shared expenses between the Department of Defense and 

other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government to support such plans. 

(b) AIRCRAFT SIMULATOR TRAINING.—It is the sense of Congress 

that— 

(1) the use of aircraft simulators offers cost savings and provides members of the Armed Forces cost-effective preparation for 

combat; and 

(2) existing synergies between the Department of Defense and 

entities in the private sector should be maintained and cultivated to provide members of the Armed Forces with the most 

cost-effective aircraft simulation capabilities possible. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

SEC. 1081. ONLINE AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 122a of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—To the maximum extent practicable, on or after 

the date on which each report described in subsection (b) is submitted to Congress, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs, shall ensure that the report is made available to the public by— 

‘‘(1) posting the report on a publicly accessible Internet 

website of the Department of Defense; and 

‘‘(2) upon request, transmitting the report by other means, as 

long as such transmission is at no cost to the Department.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall apply with respect to reports submitted to Congress after the 

date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 1082. OVERSIGHT OF COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES. 

Section 193(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in 

the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘‘and the congressional defense committees’’ after ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’. 

SEC. 1083. INCLUSION IN ANNUAL REPORT OF DESCRIPTION OF 

INTERAGENCY COORDINATION RELATING TO HUMANITARIAN DEMINING TECHNOLOGY. 

Section 407(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; 

and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(5) a description of interagency efforts to coordinate and improve research, development, test, and evaluation for humanitarian demining technology and mechanical clearance methods, 

including the transfer of relevant counter-improvised explosive 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
205 

device technology with potential humanitarian demining applications.’’. 

SEC. 1084. REPEAL AND MODIFICATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, United States 

Code, is amended as follows: 

(1)(A) Section 483 is repealed. 

(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 483. 

(2) Section 2216 is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (i); and 

(B) by redesignating subsections (j) and (k) as subsections 

(i) and (j), respectively. 

(3) Section 2885(a)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘If a project’’ 

and inserting ‘‘In the case of a project for new construction, if 

the project’’. 

(b) ANNUAL NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACTS.— 

(1) FISCAL YEAR 2009.—Section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 

(Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note), as amended by section 334, is further amended by striking subparagraph (A), as 

designated by such section, and inserting the following new 

subparagraph (A): 

‘‘(A) Not later than December 31 of each year, the corrosion control and prevention executive of a military department shall submit 

to the Secretary of Defense a report containing recommendations 

pertaining to the corrosion control and prevention program of the 

military department. Such report shall include recommendations for 

the funding levels necessary for the executive to carry out the duties 

of the executive under this section.’’. 

(2) FISCAL YEAR 2008.—The National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as 

follows: 

(A) Section 1074(b)(6) (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended— 

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in subparagraph 

(D), the Secretary’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) EXCEPTIONS.—Subparagraph (A) does not apply to 

determinations made with respect to the following individuals: 

‘‘(i) An individual described in paragraph (2)(C) who 

is otherwise sponsored by the Secretary of Defense, the 

Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff, or the Vice Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff. 

‘‘(ii) An individual described in paragraph (2)(E).’’. 

(B) Section 2864 (10 U.S.C. 2911 note) is repealed. 

(3) FISCAL YEAR 2007.—Section 226 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public 

Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2131) is repealed. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
206 

SEC. 1085. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR COMPTROLLER GENERAL 

ASSESSMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EFFICIENCIES. 

Section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1582) is repealed. 

SEC. 1086. REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES AND UNITED STATES SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review 

of the United States Special Operations Forces organization, capabilities, structure, and oversight. 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review conducted 

under subsection (a). Such report shall include an analysis and, 

where appropriate, an assessment of the adequacy of each of the following: 

(1) The organizational structure of the United States Special 

Operations Command and each subordinate component, as in 

effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) The policy and civilian oversight structures for Special 

Operations Forces within the Department of Defense, as in effect 

as of the date of the enactment of this Act, including the statutory structures and responsibilities of the Office of the Secretary 

of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict 

and the alignment of resources, including human capital, with 

regard to such responsibilities within the Department. 

(3) The roles and responsibilities of United States Special Operations Command and Special Operations Forces under section 167 of title 10, United States Code. 

(4) Current and future special operations peculiar requirements of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands and Theater Special Operations Commands. 

(5) Command relationships between United States Special 

Operations Command, its subordinate component commands, 

and the geographic combatant commands. 

(6) The funding authorities, uses, acquisition processes, and 

civilian oversight mechanisms of Major Force Program–11. 

(7) Changes to structure, authorities, acquisition processes, 

oversight mechanisms, Major Force Program–11 funding, roles, 

and responsibilities assumed in the 2014 Quadrennial Defense 

Review. 

(8) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense determines are 

appropriate to ensure a comprehensive review and assessment. 

(c) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which 

the report required by subsection (b) is submitted, the Comptroller 

General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of the report. Such review shall include 

an assessment of— 

(1) United States Special Operations Forces organization, 

force structure, capabilities, authorities, acquisition processes, 

and civilian oversight mechanisms; 

(2) how the special operations force structure is aligned with 

conventional force structures and national military strategies; 

and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
207 

(3) any other matters the Comptroller General determines are 

relevant. 

SEC. 1087. REPORTS ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS. 

(a) REPORT ON COLLABORATION, DEMONSTRATION, AND USE

CASES AND DATA SHARING.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary 

of Transportation, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics 

and Space Administration, on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee, shall submit jointly to the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth the following: 

(1) The collaboration, demonstrations, and initial fielding of 

unmanned aircraft systems at test sites within and outside of 

restricted airspace. 

(2) The progress being made to develop public and civil senseand-avoid and command-and-control technology. 

(3) An assessment on the sharing of operational, programmatic, and research data relating to unmanned aircraft 

systems operations by the Federal Aviation Administration, the 

Department of Defense, and the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration to help the Federal Aviation Administration establish civil unmanned aircraft systems certification 

standards, pilot certification and licensing, and air traffic control procedures, including identifying the locations selected to 

collect, analyze, and store the data. 

(b) REPORT ON RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS NEEDED FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS DESCRIBED IN THE 5-YEAR ROADMAP.— 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

the Secretary of Defense, on behalf of the UAS Executive Committee, 

shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 

setting forth the resource requirements needed to meet the milestones for unmanned aircraft systems integration described in the 5- 

year roadmap under section 332(a)(5) of the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act (Public Law 112–95; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note). 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Commerce, Science and Transportation, and the Committee 

on Appropriations of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure, the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘UAS Executive Committee’’ means the Department of Defense-Federal Aviation Administration executive committee described in section 1036(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public 

Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4596) established by the Secretary of 

Defense and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
208 

SEC. 1088. REPORT ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE SUPPORT CONTRACTS 

FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment 

of the current approach of the Department of Defense to managing 

foreign language support contracts for the Department. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following: 

(1) A description and analysis of the spending by the Department on all types of foreign language support services and products acquired by the components of the Department. 

(2) An assessment, in light of the analysis under paragraph 

(1), of whether any adjustment is needed in the management of 

foreign language support contracts for the Department in order 

to obtain efficiencies in contracts for all types of foreign language support for the Department. 

SEC. 1089. CIVIL AIR PATROL. 

(a) REPORT.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the Civil Air Patrol 

fleet. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of whether the current number of aircraft, 

operating locations, and types of aircraft in the Civil Air Patrol 

fleet are suitable for each of the following: 

(A) Emergency missions in support of the Air Force, the 

Federal Emergency Management Agency, State and local 

governments, and others. 

(B) Other operational missions in support of the Air 

Force, other Federal agencies, State and local governments, 

and others. 

(C) Flight proficiency, flight training, and operational 

mission training and support for cadet orientation and 

cadet flight training programs in every State Civil Air Patrol wing. 

(2) An assessment of the ideal overall size of the Civil Air Patrol aircraft fleet, including a description of the factors used in 

determining that size. 

(3) An assessment of the process used by the Civil Air Patrol 

and the Air Force to determine aircraft operating locations, and 

whether State wing commanders are appropriately involved in 

that process. 

(4) An assessment of the process used by the Civil Air Patrol, 

the Air Force, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and 

others to determine the type of aircraft and number of aircraft 

to be needed to support emergency, operational, and training 

missions. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
209 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

SEC. 1091. TECHNICAL AND CLERICAL AMENDMENTS. 

(a) TITLE 10.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows: 

(1) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and 

at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each amended 

by striking the item relating to chapter 24 and inserting the following: 

‘‘24. Nuclear Posture ......................................................................................... 491’’. 

(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 130e and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of critical infrastructure security 

information.’’. 

(3) Section 179(a)(5) is amended by striking ‘‘commander’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Commander’’. 

(4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 9 is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 231 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘231. Budgeting for construction of naval vessels: annual plan and certification.’’. 

(5) Section 231a(a) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year of Defense’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense’’. 

(6) Chapter 24 is amended by adding a period at the end of 

the enumerator of section 498. 

(7) Section 494(c) is amended by striking ‘‘the date of the enactment of this Act’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’. 

(8) Section 673(a) is amended by inserting ‘‘of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice’’ after ‘‘120c’’. 

(9) Section 1401a is amended by striking ‘‘before the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2008’’ in subsections (d) and (e) and inserting ‘‘before January 

28, 2008’’. 

(10) Section 2359b(k)(4)(B) is amended by adding a period at 

the end. 

(11) Section 2461(a)(5)(E)(i) is amended by striking ‘‘the a’’ 

and inserting ‘‘the’’. 

(b) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR

2013.—Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein 

as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112–239) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 322(e)(2) (126 Stat. 1695) is amended by striking 

‘‘Section 2366b(A)(3)(F)’’ and inserting ‘‘Section 2366b(a)(3)(F)’’. 

(2) Section 371(a)(1) (126 Stat. 1706) is amended by striking 

‘‘subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively’’ 

and inserting ‘‘subsection (f) as subsection (g)’’. 

(3) Section 611(7) (126 Stat. 1776) is amended by striking 

‘‘Section 408a(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘Section 478a(e)’’. 

(4) Section 822(b) (126 Stat. 1830) is amended by striking 

‘‘such Act’’ and inserting ‘‘such section’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
210 

(5) Section 1031(b)(3)(B) (126 Stat. 1918) is amended by 

striking the subclause (III) immediately below clause (iv). 

(6) Section 1031(b)(4) (126 Stat. 1919) is amended by striking 

‘‘Section 1031(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘Section 1041(b)’’. 

(7) Section 1086(d)(1) (126 Stat. 1969) is amended by striking 

‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’. 

(8) Section 1221(a)(2) (126 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking ‘‘FISCAL’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘FISCAL’’. 

(9) Section 1804 (126 Stat. 2111) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (h)(1)(B), by striking ‘‘inserting ‘; and’;’’ 

and inserting ‘‘inserting a semicolon;’’; and 

(B) in subsection (i), by inserting after ‘‘it appears’’ the 

following: ‘‘(except in those places in which ‘Administrator 

of FEMA’ already appears)’’. 

(c) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR

2012.—Effective as of December 31, 2011, and as if included therein 

as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2012 (Public Law 112–81) is amended as follows: 

(1) Section 312(b)(6)(F) (125 Stat. 1354) is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (D)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)’’. 

(2) Section 585(a)(1) (125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is 

amended by striking ‘‘experts sexual’’ and inserting ‘‘experts in 

sexual’’. 

(d) NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR

2004.—Section 338(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 5013 note), as 

most recently amended by section 321 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 

1694), is amended by striking ‘‘subsection 4703’’ and inserting ‘‘section 4703’’. 

(e) AMENDMENT TO TITLE 41.—Section 4712(i) is amended by inserting before ‘‘the enactment’’ the following: ‘‘that is 180 days after 

the date’’. 

(f) COORDINATION WITH OTHER AMENDMENTS MADE BY THIS

ACT.—For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of 

this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any 

amendment made by other provisions of this Act. 

SEC. 1092. REDUCTION IN COSTS TO REPORT CRITICAL CHANGES TO 

MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAMS. 

(a) EXTENSION OF A PROGRAM DEFINED.—Section 2445a of title 

10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(g) EXTENSION OF A PROGRAM.—In this chapter, the term ‘extension of a program’ means, with respect to a major automated information system program or other major information technology investment program, the further deployment or planned deployment to 

additional users of the system which has already been found operationally effective and suitable by an independent test agency or the 

Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, beyond the scope 

planned in the original estimate or information originally submitted 

on the program.’’. 

(b) REPORTS ON CRITICAL CHANGES IN MAIS PROGRAMS.—Subsection (d) of section 2445c of such title is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
211 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (3)’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) CERTIFICATION WHEN VARIANCE DUE TO EXTENSION OF

PROGRAM.—If an official with milestone decision authority for 

a program who, following receipt of a quarterly report described 

in paragraph (1) and making a determination described in 

paragraph (3), also determines that the circumstances resulting 

in the determination described in paragraph (3) (A) is primarily 

due to an extension of a program, and (B) involves minimal developmental risk, the official may, in lieu of carrying out an 

evaluation and submitting a report in accordance with paragraph (1), submit to the congressional defense committees, within 45 days after receiving the quarterly report, a certification 

that the official has made those determinations. If such a certification is submitted, the limitation in subsection (g)(1) does 

not apply with respect to that determination under paragraph 

(3).’’. 

(c) CONFORMING CROSS-REFERENCE AMENDMENT.—Subsection 

(g)(1) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (d)(2)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘subsection (d)(3)’’. 

(d) TOTAL ACQUISITION COST INFORMATION.—Title 10, United 

States Code, is further amended— 

(1) in section 2445b(b)(3), by striking ‘‘development costs’’ and 

inserting ‘‘total acquisition costs’’; and 

(2) in section 2445c— 

(A) in subparagraph (B) of subsection (c)(2), by striking 

‘‘program development cost’’ and inserting ‘‘total acquisition 

cost’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (C) of subsection (d)(3) (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)), by striking ‘‘program development cost’’ and inserting ‘‘total acquisition cost’’. 

(e) CLARIFICATION OF CROSS-REFERENCE.—Section 2445c(g)(2) of 

such title is amended by striking ‘‘in compliance with the requirements of subsection (d)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘under subsection 

(d)(1)(B)’’. 

SEC. 1093. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION TO ISSUE NON-PREMIUM AVIATION INSURANCE. 

Section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before ‘‘The authority’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘this chapter’’ and inserting ‘‘any provision of 

this chapter other than section 44305’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b) INSURANCE OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PROPERTY.— 

The authority of the Secretary of Transportation to provide insurance and reinsurance for a department, agency, or instrumentality 

of the United States Government under section 44305 is not effective 

after December 31, 2018.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
212 

SEC. 1094. EXTENSION OF MINISTRY OF DEFENSE ADVISOR PROGRAM 

AND AUTHORITY TO WAIVE REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS 

OF ACTIVITIES FOR CERTAIN NONGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL. 

(a) EXTENSION OF MINISTER OF DEFENSE ADVISOR PROGRAM AUTHORITY.— 

(1) Subsection (b) of section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2017’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012, 2013, 

or 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘a fiscal year ending on or before 

that date’’. 

(2) UPDATE OF POLICY GUIDANCE ON AUTHORITY.—The Under 

Secretary of Defense for Policy shall issue an update of the policy of the Department of Defense for assignment of civilian employees of the Department as advisors to foreign ministries of 

defense under the authority in section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as amended by 

this section. 

(3) ADDITIONAL ANNUAL REPORTS.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

(4) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (c)(4) of such section 

is amended by striking ‘‘carried out such by such’’ and inserting 

‘‘carried out by such’’. 

(5) DATE FOR SUBMITTAL OF COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE

UNITED STATES REPORT.—Subsection (d) of such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘December 30, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’ 

(b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE REIMBURSEMENT OF

COSTS OF ACTIVITIES FOR NONGOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL AT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REGIONAL CENTERS FOR SECURITY STUDIES.—Section 941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 184 note) is amended by striking ‘‘through 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2014’’. 

SEC. 1095. AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN NATIONAL COMMISSIONS. 

(a) NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE AIR

FORCE.— 

(1) REVISION OF MEMBERS COMPENSATION.—Section 365(a) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1705) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘shall be compensated’’ and inserting 

‘‘may be compensated’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘equal to’’ and inserting ‘‘not to exceed’’; 

and 

(C) by inserting ‘‘of $155,400’’ after ‘‘annual rate’’. 

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by paragraph 

(1) shall apply with respect to compensation for a duty performed on or after April 2, 2013. 

(b) MILITARY COMPENSATION AND RETIREMENT MODERNIZATION

COMMISSION.— 

(1) SCOPE OF MILITARY COMPENSATION SYSTEM.—Section 

671(c)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
213 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1788) is amended by 

inserting before the period the following ‘‘, and includes any 

other laws, policies, or practices of the Federal Government that 

result in any direct payment of authorized or appropriated 

funds to the persons specified in subsection (b)(1)(A)’’. 

(2) COMMISSION AUTHORITIES.—Section 673 of such Act (126 

Stat. 1790) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

subsections: 

‘‘(g) USE OF GOVERNMENT INFORMATION.—The Commission may 

secure directly from any department or agency of the Federal Government such information as the Commission considers necessary to 

carry out its duties. Upon such request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission. 

‘‘(h) POSTAL SERVICES.—The Commission may use the United 

States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as 

departments and agencies of the United States. 

‘‘(i) AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT GIFTS.—The Commission may accept, 

use, and dispose of gifts or donations of services, goods, and property from non-Federal entities for the purposes of aiding and facilitating the work of the Commission. The authority in this subsection 

does not extend to gifts of money. 

‘‘(j) PERSONAL SERVICES.— ‘‘(1) AUTHORITY TO PROCURE.—The Commission may— 

‘‘(A) procure the services of experts or consultants (or of 

organizations of experts or consultants) in accordance with 

the provisions of section 3109 of title 5, United States Code; 

and 

‘‘(B) pay in connection with such services travel expenses 

of individuals, including transportation and per diem in 

lieu of subsistence, while such individuals are traveling 

from their homes or places of business to duty stations. 

‘‘(2) LIMITATION.—The total number of experts or consultants 

procured pursuant to paragraph (1) may not exceed five experts 

or consultants. 

‘‘(3) MAXIMUM DAILY PAY RATES.—The daily rate paid an expert or consultant procured pursuant to paragraph (1) may not 

exceed the daily rate paid a person occupying a position at level 

IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, 

United States Code.’’. 

(3) COMMISSION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—Section 

674(f) of such Act (126 Stat. 1792) is amended— 

(A) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘15 months’’ and inserting ‘‘24 

months’’; and 

(ii) by inserting ‘‘and recommendations for administrative actions’’ after ‘‘legislative language’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (6), by inserting ‘‘, and shall publish a 

copy of that report on an Internet website available to the 

public,’’ after ‘‘its report to Congress’’. 

(4) PRESIDENTIAL CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION REC- OMMENDATIONS.—Section 675 of such Act (126 Stat. 1793) is 

amended by striking subsection (d). 

(5) COMMISSION STAFF.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
214 

(A) DETAILEES RECEIVING MILITARY RETIRED PAY.—Subsection (b)(3) of section 677 of such Act (126 Stat. 1794) is 

amended— 

(i) in the paragraph heading, by striking ‘‘ELIGIBLE

FOR’’ and inserting ‘‘RECEIVING’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘eligible for or receiving military retired pay’’ and inserting ‘‘who are receiving military retired pay or who, but for being under the eligibility age 

applicable under section 12731 of title 10, United 

States Code, would be eligible to receive retired pay’’. 

(B) PERFORMANCE REVIEWS.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended— 

(i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘other than a member of the uniformed services or 

officer or employee who is detailed to the Commission,’’ 

after ‘‘executive branch department,’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘(other than for 

administrative accuracy)’’ before the semicolon. 

(6) TERMINATION OF COMMISSION.—Section 679 of such Act 

(126 Stat. 1795) is amended by striking ‘‘26 months’’ and inserting ‘‘35 months’’. 

(7) FUNDING.—Section 680 of such Act (126 Stat. 1795) is 

amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$15,000,000’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: 

‘‘Amounts made available under this section after the date 

of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2014 shall be derived from fiscal year 2013 

balances that remain available for obligation on that 

date.’’. 

SEC. 1096. STRATEGY FOR FUTURE MILITARY INFORMATION OPERATIONS CAPABILITIES. 

(a) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop 

and implement a strategy for developing and sustaining through fiscal year 2020 information operations capabilities for future contingencies. The Secretary shall submit such strategy to the congressional defense committees by not later than 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 

(b) CONTENTS OF STRATEGY.—The strategy required by subsection 

(a) shall include each of the following: 

(1) A plan for the sustainment of existing capabilities that 

have been developed during the ten-year period prior to the date 

of the enactment of this Act, including such capabilities developed using funds authorized to be appropriated for overseas 

contingency operations determined to be of enduring value for 

continued sustainment. 

(2) A discussion of how the capabilities referred to in paragraph (1) are integrated into policy, doctrine, and operations. 

(3) An assessment of the force structure that is required to 

sustain operational planning and potential contingency operations, including the integration across the active and reserve 

components. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
215 

(4) Estimates of the steady-state resources needed to support 

the force structure referred to in paragraph (3), as well as estimates for resources that might be needed based on selected 

operational plans, contingency plans, and named operations. 

(5) An assessment of the impact of how new and emerging 

technologies can be incorporated into policy, doctrine, and operations. 

(6) A description of ongoing research into new capabilities 

that may be needed to fill any identified gaps and programs 

that might be required to develop such capabilities. 

(7) Potential policy implications or legal challenges that may 

prevent the integration of new and emerging technologies into 

the projected force structure. 

(8) Potential policy implications or challenges to the better 

leveraging of capabilities from interagency partners. 

SEC. 1097. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COLLABORATION ON BORDER SECURITY. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of Homeland Security should, consistent with existing law 

and authorities, seek to collaborate on enhanced United States border security, including by identifying excess property of the Department of Defense, if any, that may be suitable for use by the Department of Homeland Security to support border security efforts. 

SEC. 1098. TRANSFER OF AIRCRAFT TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS FOR 

WILDFIRE SUPPRESSION AND OTHER PURPOSES; TACTICAL AIRLIFT FLEET OF THE AIR FORCE. 

(a) TRANSFER OF HC–130H AIRCRAFT.— 

(1) TRANSFER BY DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 45 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act and subject to the certification 

requirement under subsection (f), the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Defense, shall begin transfer, 

without reimbursement, of— 

(i) the seven demilitarized HC–130H aircraft specified in subparagraph (C) to the Secretary of the Air 

Force; and 

(ii) initial spares and necessary ground support 

equipment for HC–130H aircraft to the Secretary of Agriculture for use by the Director of Aviation and Fire 

Management of the Forest Service. 

(B) CALCULATION OF INITIAL SPARES.—For purposes of 

clause (ii) of subparagraph (A), initial spares shall be calculated based on shelf stock support for seven aircraft and 

each aircraft flying 400 hours each year. 

(C) AIRCRAFT SPECIFIED.—The aircraft specified in this 

subparagraph are the HC–130H Coast Guard aircraft with 

serial numbers 1706, 1708, 1709, 1713, 1714, 1719, and 

1721. 

(2) AIR FORCE ACTIONS.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall accept the HC–130H aircraft transferred by the Secretary of 

Homeland Security under paragraph (1) and, subject to the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
216 

availability of funds as supplemented by transfers under 

paragraph (4), shall— 

(i) at the first available opportunity, promptly schedule and serially synchronize with the Secretary of 

Homeland Security and the Secretary of Agriculture 

the induction of HC–130H aircraft to minimize maintenance induction on-ramp wait time of HC–130H aircraft; 

(ii) except as provided in subparagraph (B), perform 

center and outer wing-box replacement modifications, 

programmed depot-level maintenance, and modifications necessary to procure and integrate a gravity-drop 

aerial fire retardant dispersal system in each such HC– 

130H aircraft; and 

(iii) after modifications described in clause (ii) are 

completed for each such HC–130H aircraft, transfer 

each such aircraft, without reimbursement, to the Secretary of Agriculture for use by the Director of Aviation 

and Fire Management of the Forest Service. 

(B) EXCEPTIONS.—Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), 

the Secretary of the Air Force may not— 

(i) perform center wing-box replacement modifications on the HC–130H aircraft with serial numbers 

1706, 1708, 1714, and 1721; or 

(ii) perform an outer wing-box replacement modification on the HC–130H aircraft with serial number 1721. 

(C) LIMITATIONS ON OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not obligate more than— (i) $5,000,000 per each HC–130H aircraft transferred 

under paragraph (1) to perform the modifications necessary to procure and integrate a gravity-drop aerial 

fire retardant dispersal system in each such HC–130H 

aircraft unless, by reimbursable order, the Secretary of 

Agriculture provides the additional funding necessary 

to the Secretary of the Air Force to complete such modifications; and 

(ii) $130,000,000 to perform all programmed depotlevel maintenance and modifications described in subparagraph (A)(ii) for all such aircraft unless, by reimbursable order, the Secretary of Agriculture provides 

the additional funding necessary to the Secretary of the 

Air Force to complete such modifications. 

(3) COAST GUARD ACTIONS.—In the case of any HC–130 aircraft that is identified for transfer to the Secretary of the Air 

Force and requires induction into depot-level maintenance, the 

Commandant of the Coast Guard may utilize, on a limited 

basis, such aircraft prior to depot-level maintenance to fulfill 

high-priority maritime patrol mission requirements of the Coast 

Guard. The authority under this paragraph does not include 

aircraft that are modified under paragraph (2)(A)(ii). 

(4) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may use any 

appropriations or funds of the Department of Defense available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
217 

Act, and shall make transfers as necessary to supplement 

accounts of the Department of the Air Force, to perform the 

HC–130H modifications described under paragraph (2). 

(B) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER AUTHORITY.—Transfer authority provided under this paragraph is in addition to any 

other transfer authority available to the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2014. 

(C) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 15 days after 

making a transfer pursuant to this paragraph, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees of such transfer. 

(b) TRANSFER OF C–23B+ SHERPA AIRCRAFT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

law, not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, and subject to the certification requirement under subsection (f), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the 

Secretary of Agriculture, shall begin transfer, without reimbursement, of— 

(A) not more than 15 demilitarized C–23B+ Sherpa aircraft to the Secretary of Agriculture, subject to the quantity 

of C–23B+ Sherpa aircraft that the Director of Aviation 

and Fire Management of the Forest Service determines are 

required to meet fire-fighting requirements; and 

(B) initial spares and necessary ground support equipment for operation of C–23B+Sherpa aircraft to the Secretary of Agriculture for use by the Director of Aviation and 

Fire Management of the Forest Service. 

(2) CALCULATION OF INITIAL SPARES.—For purposes of paragraph (1), initial spares shall be calculated based on shelf stock 

support for the quantity of aircraft the Director of Aviation and 

Fire Management of the Forest Service determines necessary to 

meet fire-fighting requirements and each aircraft flying 300 

hours each year. 

(c) CONDITIONS OF TRANSFERS.—Aircraft transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture under this section— 

(1) may be used only for wildfire suppression purposes; 

(2) may not be flown outside of, or otherwise removed from, 

the United States unless dispatched by the National Interagency Fire Center in support of an international agreement to 

assist in wildfire suppression efforts or for other purposes approved by the Secretary of Agriculture in writing in advance; 

and 

(3) may not be sold by the Secretary of Agriculture after 

transfer. 

(d) COSTS AFTER TRANSFER.—Any costs of operation, maintenance, sustainment, and disposal of excess aircraft, initial spares, 

and ground support equipment transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture under this section that are incurred after the date of transfer 

shall be borne by the Secretary of Agriculture. 

(e) TRANSFER OF C–27J AIRCRAFT.—Promptly following the completion of the certification requirement under subsection (f) and notwithstanding section 1091 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1971; 10 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
218 

U.S.C. 2576 note), the Secretary of Defense shall begin transfer, 

without reimbursement, of— 

(1) 14 C–27J aircraft to the Secretary of Homeland Security; 

and 

(2) excess initial spares and necessary ground support equipment for 14 C–27J aircraft to the Secretary of Homeland Security for use by the Commandant of the Coast Guard as maritime patrol aircraft. 

(f) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—Notwithstanding any other 

provision of law, the Secretary of Defense may not transfer any aircraft to either the Secretary of Agriculture or the Secretary of Homeland Security until the Secretary of Defense and the Director of the 

Office of Management and Budget submit, by not later than 45 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, to the congressional defense committees certification that adequate funding has been transferred to the Department of the Air Force for the purpose of modifying HC–130H aircraft identified for transfer pursuant to subsection (a). 

(g) TRANSFER OF CERTAIN C–23 AIRCRAFT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.— 

(A) OFFER OF TRANSFER.—Not later than 30 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 

Defense shall extend to the chief executive officer of the 

State of Alaska the opportunity to take title to not more 

than eight C–23 aircraft with tail numbers specified in subparagraph (B). 

(B) TAIL NUMBERS.—The tail numbers of the C–23 aircraft subject to transfer under subparagraph (A) are as follows: 93–01319, 93–01329, 94–00308, 94–00309, 88–01869, 

90–07015, 90–07016, and 90–07012. 

(2) REQUIREMENTS.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 112 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 

(Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1318) shall apply with respect 

to the transfer of any C–23 aircraft under this subsection in the 

same manner as the transfer of aircraft under such section. 

(h) TACTICAL AIRLIFT FLEET OF THE AIR FORCE.— 

(1) CONSIDERATION OF UPGRADES OF CERTAIN AIRCRAFT IN

RECAPITALIZATION OF FLEET.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

shall consider, as part of the recapitalization of the tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force, upgrades to C–130H aircraft designed 

to help such aircraft meet the fuel efficiency goals of the Department of the Air Force and retention of such aircraft, as so upgraded, in the tactical airlift fleet. 

(2) MANNER OF UPGRADES.—The Secretary shall ensure that 

upgrades to the C–130H aircraft fleet are made in a manner 

that is proportional to the number of C–130H aircraft in the 

force structure of the regular Air Force, the Air Force Reserve, 

and the Air National Guard. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
219 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL 

MATTERS 

Sec. 1101. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium 

pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees 

working overseas. 

Sec. 1102. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat zone. 

Sec. 1103. Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees 

of the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1104. Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees. 

Sec. 1105. Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense 

Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) Defense Education Program and assessment of STEM and other programs. 

Sec. 1106. Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel. 

Sec. 1107. Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities. 

Sec. 1108. Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian personnel. 

Sec. 1109. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members 

of the Armed Forces. 

SEC. 1101. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANNUAL 

LIMITATION ON PREMIUM PAY AND AGGREGATE LIMITATION ON PAY FOR FEDERAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES WORKING OVERSEAS. 

Effective January 1, 2014, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public 

Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 

1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1973), is further amended by striking ‘‘through 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2014’’. 

SEC. 1102. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO 

GRANT ALLOWANCES, BENEFITS, AND GRATUITIES TO 

PERSONNEL ON OFFICIAL DUTY IN A COMBAT ZONE. 

Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental 

Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as 

added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 

4616) and most recently amended by section 1104 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 125 Stat. 1973), is further amended by striking ‘‘2014’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

SEC. 1103. EXTENSION OF VOLUNTARY REDUCTION-IN-FORCE AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

Section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘September 30, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2018’’. 

SEC. 1104. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE LUMP-SUM SEVERANCE PAYMENTS TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EMPLOYEES. 

Section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘October 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2018’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
220 

SEC. 1105. REVISION TO AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS, AND 

RESEARCH FOR TRANSFORMATION (SMART) DEFENSE 

EDUCATION PROGRAM AND ASSESSMENT OF STEM AND 

OTHER PROGRAMS. 

(a) REVISION TO FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SMART PROGRAM.— 

(1) REVISION.—Paragraph (2) of section 2192a(b) of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the amount determined’’ and all that follows through ‘‘room and board’’ and inserting ‘‘an amount determined by the Secretary of Defense’’. 

(2) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives, within 60 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, a briefing that assesses the impacts of the 

rising costs of higher education tuition on the number of students that the Department of Defense can accept into the 

Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation 

(SMART) Defense Education Program under section 2192a of 

title 10, United States Code. 

(b) ASSESSMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCIENCE, 

TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS PROGRAMS OF THE

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.— 

(1) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.— 

(A) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of each program as follows: 

(i) The Army Educational Outreach Program 

(AEOP). 

(ii) The STEM2Stern program of the Navy. 

(iii) The DoD STARBASE program carried out by 

the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 

Readiness. 

(iv) Prekindergarten through 12th grade activities of 

the National Defense Education Program. 

(B) The Secretary of Defense shall conduct assessments 

under this paragraph in consultation with the Secretary of 

Education and the heads of other appropriate Federal 

agencies. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment of a program under paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

(A) An assessment of the current status of the program. 

(B) A determination to retain, terminate, or transfer the 

program to another agency, together with a justification for 

the determination. 

(C) For a program determined under subparagraph (B) 

to be terminated, a justification why the science, technology, 

engineering, and mathematics education requirements of 

the program are no longer required. 

(D) For a program determined under subparagraph (B) 

to be transferred to the jurisdiction of another agency— 

(i) the name of such agency; 

(ii) the funding anticipated to be provided the program by such agency during the five-year period beginning on the date of transfer; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
221 

(iii) mechanisms to ensure that education under the 

program will continue to meet the science, technology, 

engineering, and mathematics education requirements 

of the Department of Defense, including requirements 

for the dependents covered by the program. 

(E) Metrics to assess whether a program under subparagraph (C) or (D) is meeting the requirements applicable to 

such program under such subparagraph. 

(3) LIMITATION ON CERTAIN ACTIONS ON PROGRAMS PENDING

SUBMITTAL OF ASSESSMENT.—A program specified in paragraph 

(1)(A) may not be terminated or transferred to the jurisdiction 

of another agency until 30 days after the date on which the report required by that paragraph is submitted to the congressional defense committees. 

(c) ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY SCIENCE AND ENGI- NEERING FACULTY FELLOWSHIP.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

provide to the congressional defense committees, within 90 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, a briefing that assesses 

the National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellowship 

(in this subsection referred to as the ‘‘Fellowship’’). The briefing 

shall include an assessment of the following: 

(1) The return on investment and qualitative impact of the research funded by Fellowship awardees. 

(2) Distribution of researcher awards from the past three 

years, including identification of researchers (if any) that have 

not done research with the Department of Defense in the past 

five years. 

(3) The number of new and continuing students supported by 

Fellowship funding, as well as the number of those students 

that later receive employment by the Department of Defense, Department of Defense contractors, or other academic institutions 

supported by Department of Defense grants. 

(4) A description of Fellowship awards and the use of the 

award funds. 

(5) Recommendations for improving the effectiveness or efficiency of the Fellowship. 

SEC. 1106. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM FOR EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY PERSONNEL. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1110(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 3702 note) is amended 

by striking ‘‘2013.’’ and inserting ‘‘2018.’’. 

(b) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 1110(i) of such Act is 

amended by striking ‘‘2015,’’ and inserting ‘‘2019,’’. 

SEC. 1107. TEMPORARY AUTHORITIES FOR CERTAIN POSITIONS AT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING 

FACILITIES. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO MAKE DIRECT APPOINTMENTS.— 

(1) CANDIDATES FOR SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING POSITIONS

AT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY REINVENTION LABORATORIES.— 

The director of any Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (hereinafter in this section referred to as an ‘‘STRL’’) 

may appoint qualified candidates possessing a bachelor’s degree 

to positions described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b) as an 

employee in a laboratory described in that paragraph without 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
222 

regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, 

United States Code (other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such 

title). 

(2) VETERAN CANDIDATES FOR SIMILAR POSITIONS AT RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FACILITIES.—The director of any 

STRL may appoint qualified veteran candidates to positions described in paragraph (2) of subsection (b) as an employee at a 

laboratory, agency, or organization specified in that paragraph 

without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 

of title 5, United States Code. 

(b) COVERED POSITIONS.— 

(1) CANDIDATES FOR SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING POSITIONS.—The positions described in this paragraph are scientific 

and engineering positions that may be temporary, term, or permanent in any laboratory designated by section 1105(a) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratory. 

(2) QUALIFIED VETERAN CANDIDATES.—The positions described in this paragraph are scientific, technical, engineering, 

and mathematics positions, including technicians, in the following: 

(A) Any laboratory referred to in paragraph (1). 

(B) Any other Department of Defense research and engineering agency or organization designated by the Secretary 

for purposes of subsection (a)(2). 

(c) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF APPOINTMENTS ALLOWABLE IN A

CALENDAR YEAR.—The authority under subsection (a) may not, in 

any calendar year and with respect to any laboratory, agency, or organization described in subsection (b), be exercised with respect to 

a number of candidates greater than the following: 

(1) In the case of a laboratory described in subsection (b)(1), 

with respect to appointment authority under subsection (a)(1), 

the number equal to 3 percent of the total number of scientific 

and engineering positions in such laboratory that are filled as 

of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the start of such 

calendar year. 

(2) In the case of a laboratory, agency, or organization described in subsection (b)(2), with respect to appointment authority under subsection (a)(2), the number equal to 1 percent of the 

total number of scientific, technical, engineering, mathematics, 

and technician positions in such laboratory, agency, or organization that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending 

before the start of such calendar year. 

(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘employee’’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 2105 of title 5, United States Code. 

(2) The term ‘‘veteran’’ has the meaning given that term in 

section 101 of title 38, United States Code. 

(e) SUNSET.—Appointments under subsection (a) may not be made 

after December 31, 2019. 

(f) SENIOR SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL MANAGERS.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
223 

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is hereby established in each 

STRL a category of senior professional scientific and technical 

positions, the incumbents of which shall be designated as ‘‘senior scientific technical managers’’ and which shall be positions 

classified above GS–15 of the General Schedule, notwithstanding section 5108(a) of title 5, United States Code. The primary functions of such positions shall be— 

(A) to engage in research and development in the physical, biological, medical, or engineering sciences, or another 

field closely related to the mission of such STRL; and 

(B) to carry out technical supervisory responsibilities. 

(2) APPOINTMENTS.—The positions described in paragraph (1) 

may be filled, and shall be managed, by the director of the 

STRL involved, under criteria established pursuant to section 

342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), relating to personnel demonstration projects at laboratories of the Department 

of Defense, except that the director of the laboratory involved 

shall determine the number of such positions at such laboratory, not to exceed 1 percent of the number of scientists and engineers employed at such laboratory as of the close of the last 

fiscal year before the fiscal year in which any appointments 

subject to that numerical limitation are made. 

(3) SUNSET.—Appointments under this subsection may not be 

made after December 31, 2019. 

(g) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report on 

the operation of this section. Each such report shall include, for the 

period covered by such report— 

(1) the total number of individuals appointed under subsection (a)(1) during such period; 

(2) the total number of individuals appointed under subsection (a)(2) during such period; and 

(3) the total number of senior scientific technical managers at 

each STRL as of the end of such period. 

(h) EXCLUSION FROM PERSONNEL LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The director of an STRL shall manage the 

workforce strength, structure, positions, and compensation of 

such STRL— 

(A) without regard to any limitation on appointments, positions, or funding with respect to such STRL, subject to 

subparagraph (B); and 

(B) in a manner consistent with the budget available 

with respect to such STRL. 

(2) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to Senior Executive Service positions (as defined in section 3132(a) of title 

5, United States Code) or scientific and professional positions 

authorized under section 3104 of such title. 

SEC. 1108. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF 

FUNDING FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL. 

(a) REGULATIONS.—No later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations implementing the authority in subsection (a) of section 1111 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
224 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 1580 note prec.). 

(b) COORDINATION.—The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall be responsible for coordinating the 

preparation of the regulations required under subsection (a). 

(c) LIMITATIONS.—The regulations required under subsection (a) 

shall not be restricted by any civilian full-time equivalent or endstrength limitation, nor shall such regulations require offsetting civilian pay funding, civilian full-time equivalents, or civilian endstrengths. 

SEC. 1109. EXTENSION OF ENHANCED APPOINTMENT AND COMPENSATION AUTHORITY FOR CIVILIAN PERSONNEL FOR CARE 

AND TREATMENT OF WOUNDED AND INJURED MEMBERS 

OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (c) of section 1599c of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2015’’ both 

places it appears and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2020’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF FULFILLED REQUIREMENT.—Such section is further 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (b); and 

(2) by redesignating subsection (c), as amended by subsection 

(a), as subsection (b). 

(c) REPEAL OF REFERENCES TO CERTAIN TITLE 5 AUTHORITIES.— 

Subsection (a)(2)(A) of such section is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘sections 3304, 5333, and 5753 of title 5’’ and 

inserting ‘‘section 3304 of title 5’’; and 

(2) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘the authorities in such sections’’ 

and inserting ‘‘the authority in such section’’. 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO 

FOREIGN NATIONS 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

Sec. 1201. Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to build the 

capacity of foreign military forces. 

Sec. 1202. Global Security Contingency Fund. 

Sec. 1203. Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces 

with military and other security forces of friendly foreign countries. 

Sec. 1204. Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. 

Sec. 1205. Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program. 

Sec. 1206. United States security and assistance strategies in Africa. 

Sec. 1207. Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations. 

Sec. 1208. Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the Lord’s 

Resistance Army. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq 

Sec. 1211. Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1212. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in 

Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1213. Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for 

support provided to United States military operations. 

Sec. 1214. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq. 

Sec. 1215. One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop 

and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
225 

Sec. 1216. Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed by Afghanistan. 

Sec. 1217. Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces supporting 

or participating with the United States Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1218. Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program. 

Sec. 1219. Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program. 

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014 

Sec. 1221. Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities and 

finances. 

Sec. 1222. Completion of accelerated transition of security responsibility from 

United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security Forces. 

Sec. 1223. Defense intelligence plan. 

Sec. 1224. Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan. 

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran 

Sec. 1231. Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation 

Council countries. 

Sec. 1232. Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran. 

Sec. 1233. Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in 

Southwest Asia. 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters 

Sec. 1241. Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities. 

Sec. 1242. Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on military 

and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. 

Sec. 1243. Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond to an 

attack or other contingency against United States diplomatic facilities 

overseas. 

Sec. 1244. Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers. 

Sec. 1245. Additional reports on military and security developments involving the 

Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. 

Sec. 1246. Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the Russian Federation and limitations on providing certain missile defense information 

to the Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1247. Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament 

Act. 

Sec. 1248. Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile proliferation. 

Sec. 1249. Reports on international agreements relating to the Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1250. Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations 

and related NATO agreements. 

Sec. 1251. Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to ballistic 

missile defense. 

Sec. 1252. Rule of construction. 

Sec. 1253. Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade Treaty. 

Sec. 1254. Report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation. 

Sec. 1255. Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with 

Rosoboronexport. 

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

SEC. 1201. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROGRAM TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF FOREIGN 

MILITARY FORCES. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 1206 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109– 

163; 119 Stat. 3456), as most recently amended by section 1206 of 

the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
226 

Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4625), is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) To build the capacity of a foreign country’s security forces 

to conduct counterterrorism operations.’’. 

(b) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Subsection (c)(5) of section 1206 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as 

most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 

1979), is further amended— (1) by striking ‘‘not more than $75,000,000 may be used dur- ing fiscal year 2010, not more than $75,000,000 may be used 

during fiscal year 2011, and’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘each of fiscal years 2012, 2013, and 2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘each fiscal year through fiscal year 2017’’. 

(c) LIMITATION ON FISCAL YEAR 2015 FUNDS.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 1206 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 or otherwise made 

available for fiscal year 2015, not more than $262,500,000 may be 

obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the proposed planning and execution 

of programs intended to be conducted or supported under subsection 

(a)(3) of section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2006, as added by subsection (a), during fiscal year 

2015, including a description of the proposed planning and execution of the amount of funds to be made available for such programs. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with 

the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the scope of counterterrorism operations for which 

assistance is authorized to be provided under section 1206 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006. The report 

shall include the following: 

(1) A statement of the purposes for which assistance may be 

provided under the authority of section 1206 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, consistent with 

the Presidential Policy Directive on United States Security Sector Assistance issued on April 5, 2013. 

(2) A description of the types of activities that are appropriately within the scope of capacity building assistance under 

such authority. 

(3) A description and assessment of the monitoring and evaluation procedures for such assistance, including measures of effectiveness applicable to counterterrorism capacity building activities under such authority. 

(4) A prioritized list and discussion of the primary security 

threats as of the date of the report against which counterterrorism capacity building under such authority is or may be directed, in light of the end of combat operations in Iraq and the 

expected completion of combat operations by coalition forces in 

Afghanistan by December 2014. 

(e) TERMINATION OF PROGRAM.—Subsection (g) of section 1206 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, as 

most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense AuVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00258 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
227 

thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, is further amended by striking 

‘‘2014’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘2017’’. 

SEC. 1202. GLOBAL SECURITY CONTINGENCY FUND. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (b) of section 1207 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 

125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended— 

(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or regions’’ after ‘‘countries’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 

‘‘and other national security forces’’ and inserting ‘‘or other 

national security forces’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (A)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘and counterterrorism operations’’ and 

inserting ‘‘or counterterrorism operations’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end and inserting ‘‘or’’. 

(b) NOTICES TO CONGRESS.—Subsection (l) of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(l) NOTICES TO CONGRESS.—Not less than 30 days before initiating an activity under a program of assistance under subsection 

(b), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall jointly 

submit to the specified congressional committees a notification that 

includes the following: 

‘‘(1) A notification of the intent to transfer funds into the 

Fund under subsection (f) or any other authority, including the 

original source of the funds. 

‘‘(2) A detailed justification for the total anticipated program 

for each country, including total anticipated costs and the specific activities contained therein. 

‘‘(3) The budget, execution plan and timeline, and anticipated 

completion date for the activity. 

‘‘(4) A list of other security-related assistance or justice sector 

and stabilization assistance that the United States is currently 

providing the country concerned and that is related to or supported by the activity. 

‘‘(5) Such other information relating to the program or activity as the Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense considers 

appropriate.’’. 

(c) TRANSITIONAL AUTHORITIES; GUIDANCE AND PROCESSES FOR

EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.—Such section, as so amended, is further 

amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (n); 

(2) by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n); and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (l), as so amended, the following new subsection (m): 

‘‘(m) GUIDANCE AND PROCESSES FOR EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.— 

Not later than 15 days after the date on which guidance and processes for implementation of the authority in subsection (b) have been 

issued, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall 

jointly submit a report to the specified congressional committees on 

such guidance and processes. The Secretary of State and Secretary 

of Defense shall jointly submit additional reports not later than 15 

days after the date on which any future modifications to the guidVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00259 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
228 

ance and processes for implementation of the authority in subsection 

(b) are issued.’’. 

(d) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Subsection (n) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (c)(2) of this section, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘October 30, 2012, and annually thereafter’’ 

and inserting ‘‘October 30 each year’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘subsection (q)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (p)’’. 

(e) FUNDING.—Such section, as so amended, is further amended— 

(1) by striking subsection (o); and 

(2) by redesignating subsections (p) and (q) as subsections (o) 

and (p), respectively. 

SEC. 1203. TRAINING OF GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES OF THE UNITED 

STATES ARMED FORCES WITH MILITARY AND OTHER SECURITY FORCES OF FRIENDLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES. 

(a) TRAINING AUTHORIZED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Under regulations prescribed under subsection (f), general purpose forces of the United States Armed 

Forces may train with the military forces or other security 

forces of a friendly foreign country if the Secretary of Defense 

determines that it is in the national security interests of the 

United States to do so. Training may be conducted under this 

section only with the prior approval of the Secretary of Defense. 

(2) CONCURRENCE.—Before conducting a training event in or 

with a foreign country under this subsection, the Secretary of 

Defense shall seek the concurrence of the Secretary of State in 

such training event. 

(b) TYPES OF TRAINING AUTHORIZED.—Any training conducted by 

the United States Armed Forces pursuant to subsection (a) shall, to 

the maximum extent practicable— 

(1) support the mission essential tasks for which the training 

unit providing such training is responsible; 

(2) be with a foreign unit or organization with equipment 

that is functionally similar to such training unit; and 

(3) include elements that promote— 

(A) observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; and 

(B) respect for legitimate civilian authority within the 

foreign country or countries concerned. 

(c) AUTHORITY TO PAY EXPENSES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of a military department or 

the commander of a combatant command may pay, or authorize 

payment for, the incremental expenses incurred by a friendly 

foreign country as the direct result of training with general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) LIMITATION.—The amount of incremental expenses payable under paragraph (1) in any fiscal year may not exceed 

$10,000,000. 

(d) NOTICE BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF TRAINING.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and the House of Representatives not later than 15 days 

before the commencement of any training event pursuant to subsection (a). The notice on a training event shall include a descripVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00260 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
229 

tion of the event and the foreign country or countries involved in the 

event. 

(e) ANNUAL REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Not later than April 1 of 

each year following a fiscal year in which training is conducted pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

appropriate committees of Congress a report on the training conducted pursuant to that subsection. Each report shall specify the following: 

(1) For the fiscal year covered by such report, the following: 

(A) Each country in which training was conducted. 

(B) The type of training conducted, the duration of such 

training, and the number of members of the United States 

Armed Forces involved in such training. 

(C) The extent of participation in such training by foreign 

military forces and other security forces, including the 

number and service affiliation of foreign military and other 

security force personnel involved and the physical and financial contribution of each country specified in subparagraph (A) in such training. 

(D) The relationship of such training to other overseas 

training programs conducted by the United States Armed 

Forces, such as military exercise programs sponsored by the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff, military exercise programs sponsored 

by a combatant command, and military training activities 

sponsored by a military department (including deployments 

for training, short duration exercises, and other similar 

unit training events). 

(E) A summary of the expenditures under subsection (c) 

in connection with such training. 

(F) A description and assessment of the unique military 

training benefits for members of the United States Armed 

Forces involved in such training. 

(2) A list of the training events to be conducted during the 12- 

month period beginning on April 1 of the year in which such 

report is submitted. 

(f) REGULATIONS.—Any training conducted pursuant to subsection 

(a) shall be conducted under regulations prescribed by the Secretary 

of Defense for the administration of this section. The regulations 

shall be prescribed not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of 

the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of 

the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘incremental expenses’’, with respect to a friendly 

foreign country, means the reasonable and proper costs of rations, fuel, training ammunition, transportation, and other 

goods and services consumed by such country as a direct result 

of that country’s participation in training conducted pursuant 

to subsection (a), except that such term does not include pay, alVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00261 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
230 

lowances, and other normal costs of such country’s military or 

security force personnel. 

(3) The term ‘‘other security forces’’ includes national security 

forces that conduct border and maritime security, but does not 

include civilian police. 

(h) EXPIRATION.—The authority under this section may not be exercised after September 30, 2017. 

SEC. 1204. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE THE CAPABILITY OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO RESPOND TO INCIDENTS INVOLVING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide assistance to the military 

and civilian first responder organizations of countries that share a 

border with Syria in order to enhance the capability of such countries to respond effectively to potential incidents involving weapons 

of mass destruction in Syria and the surrounding region. 

(b) AVAILABILITY OF AUTHORITY FOR OTHER COUNTRIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of Defense determines, with 

the concurrence of the Secretary of State, that the Department 

of Defense should provide the assistance authorized in subsection (a) to countries other than the countries described in 

subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may provide such assistance to such other countries. 

(2) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may not provide 

assistance under paragraph (1) until the Secretary provides 

written notification to the congressional defense committees of 

the Secretary’s intention to provide such assistance, together 

with an explanation of the scope of the assistance and the reasons for providing the assistance. 

(c) AUTHORIZED ELEMENTS.—Assistance provided under this section may include training, equipment, and supplies. 

(d) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.— 

(1) FUNDS AVAILABLE.—Amounts for assistance under this 

section in a fiscal year shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency for such fiscal year. 

(2) AVAILABILITY ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.—Amounts available 

under paragraph (1) may be available for assistance that begins 

in a fiscal year and ends in the next fiscal year. 

(e) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON CERTAIN ASSISTANCE.—If the 

amount of assistance to be provided under this section in a fiscal 

year is anticipated to exceed $4,000,000, the Secretary of Defense 

shall notify the congressional defense committees in writing of that 

fact. 

(f) INTERAGENCY COORDINATION.—In carrying out this section, the 

Secretary of Defense shall comply with all applicable requirements 

for coordination and consultation within the Executive Branch. 

(g) REPORTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the authority 

in subsection (a) is first exercised and 60 days after the end of 

any fiscal year in which the authority under this section is exercised, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate 

committees of Congress a report setting forth the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
231 

(A) A list of the countries to which the assistance has 

been or is being provided under the authority in this section, and a description of the assistance provided to each 

country under such authority. 

(B) A description of how such assistance advances the national security interests of the United States and is consistent with broader United States national security policy 

and strategy in each country provided assistance and within the applicable region. 

(C) The amount of funds used to provide such assistance 

to each country during the fiscal year covered by the report. 

(D) Any other matters the Secretary of Defense considers 

appropriate. 

(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of 

the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of 

the House of Representatives. 

(h) EXPIRATION.—The authority to provide assistance under this 

section may not be exercised after September 30, 2017. 

SEC. 1205. AUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL GUARD STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM. 

(a) AUTHORITY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized to establish a program of exchanges of members of the National Guard of a State 

or territory and the military forces, or security forces or other 

government organizations whose primary functions include disaster response or emergency response, of a foreign country. 

(2) STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.—Each program established under this subsection shall be known as a ‘‘State Partnership Program’’. 

(b) LIMITATION.—An activity under a program established under 

subsection (a) that involves the security forces or other government 

organizations whose primary functions include disaster response or 

emergency response of a foreign country, or an activity that the Secretary of Defense determines is a matter within the core competencies of the National Guard of a State or territory, may be carried out only if the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the 

Secretary of State, determines and notifies the appropriate congressional committees not less than 15 days before initiating such activity that the activity is in the national security interests of the United 

States. 

(c) REGULATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. Such regulations 

shall establish accounting procedures to ensure that expenditures of funds to carry out this section are accounted for and 

appropriate. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
232 

(2) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 15 days after the date on 

which such regulations have been prescribed, the Secretary of 

Defense— 

(A) shall notify the appropriate congressional committees 

that the regulations have been prescribed; and 

(B) shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a copy of the regulations. 

(d) AVAILABILITY OF AUTHORIZED FUNDS FOR PROGRAM.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Funds authorized to be appropriated to the 

Department of Defense, including funds authorized to be appropriated for the Army National Guard and Air National Guard, 

are authorized to be available— 

(A) for payment of costs incurred by the National Guard 

of a State or territory to conduct activities under a program 

established under subsection (a); and 

(B) for payment of incremental expenses of a foreign 

country to conduct activities under a program established 

under subsection (a). 

(2) LIMITATIONS.— 

(A) ACTIVE DUTY REQUIREMENT.—Funds shall not be 

available under paragraph (1) for the participation of a 

member of the National Guard of a State or territory in activities in a foreign country unless the member is on active 

duty in the Armed Forces at the time of such participation 

(B) INCREMENTAL EXPENSES.—The total amount of payments for incremental expenses of foreign countries as authorized under paragraph (1)(B) for activities under programs established under subsection (a) in any fiscal year 

may not exceed $10,000,000. 

(e) REPORTS AND NOTIFICATIONS.— 

(1) REVIEW AND REPORT OF EXISTING PROGRAMS.— 

(A) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall conduct a comprehensive review of each program under the State Partnership 

Program as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(B) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 

on— 

(i) the findings of the review conducted under subparagraph (A); and 

(ii) any recommendations with respect to the review 

conducted under subparagraph (A). 

(2) ANNUAL REPORT.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 31 of each year 

following a fiscal year in which activities under a program 

established under subsection (a) are carried out, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on such activities under the program. 

(B) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Each report shall specify, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
233 

(i) Each foreign country in which the activities were 

conducted. 

(ii) The type of activities conducted, the duration of 

the activities, and the number of members of the National Guard of each State or territory involved in such 

activities. 

(iii) The extent of participation in the activities by 

the military forces and security forces of such foreign 

country. 

(iv) A summary of expenditures to conduct the activities, including the annual cost of the activities, with a 

breakdown of such expenditures by geographic combatant command. 

(v) With respect to activities described in subsection 

(b), the objective of the activities, and a description of 

how the activities support the theater campaign plan of 

the commander of the geographic combatant command 

with responsibility for the country or countries in 

which the training occurred. 

(f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any authority under title 10, United States 

Code, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 

‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(2) INCREMENTAL EXPENSES.—The term ‘‘incremental expenses’’, with respect to a foreign country— 

(A) means the reasonable and proper costs of rations, 

fuel, training ammunition, transportation, and other goods 

and services consumed by the country as a direct result of 

the country’s participation in activities conducted under 

subsection (a); and 

(B) does not include— 

(i) any form of lethal assistance (excluding training 

ammunition); or 

(ii) pay, allowances, and other normal costs of the 

personnel of the country. 

(h) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 1210 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 

111–84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is repealed. 

(i) TERMINATION.—The authority granted under subsection (a) 

shall terminate on September 30, 2016. 

SEC. 1206. UNITED STATES SECURITY AND ASSISTANCE STRATEGIES 

IN AFRICA. 

(a) STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR COUNTERTERRORISM ASSISTANCE

AND COOPERATION IN THE SAHEL AND THE MAGHREB REGIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, develop a strategic framework 

for United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation 

in the Sahel and Maghreb regions of Africa, including for proVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00265 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
234 

grams conducted under the Trans-Sahara Counter Terrorism 

Partnership, Operation Enduring Freedom–Trans Sahara, and 

related security assistance authorities. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategic framework required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

(A) An evaluation of the threat of terrorist organizations 

operating in the Sahel and Maghreb regions to the national 

security of the United States. 

(B) An identification on a regional basis of the primary 

objectives, priorities, and desired end-states of United 

States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs in the region, and of the resources required to 

achieve such objectives, priorities, and end-states. 

(C) A methodology for assessing the effectiveness of 

United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation 

programs in the region in making progress towards the objectives and desired end-states identified pursuant to subparagraph (B), including an identification of key benchmarks of such progress. 

(D) Criteria for bilateral and multilateral partnerships in 

the region. 

(E) Plans for enhancing coordination among United 

States and international agencies for planning and implementation of United States counterterrorism assistance and 

cooperation programs for the region on a regional basis, 

rather than a country-by-country basis, in order to improve 

coordination among United States regional and bilateral 

counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs in 

the region. 

(3) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of 

Congress a report that includes the following: 

(A) A comprehensive description of the strategic framework required by paragraph (1). 

(B) A description of lessons learned regarding the organization and implementation of United States counterterrorism assistance and cooperation programs for the Sahel 

and Maghreb regions of Africa, including an evaluation of 

the performance and commitment of regional partners in 

the Sahel and Maghreb regions, including Mali in particular, in 2012 and 2013. 

(b) STRATEGY TO SUPPORT CONSOLIDATION OF SECURITY AND

GOVERNANCE GAINS IN SOMALIA.— 

(1) REQUIREMENT FOR STRATEGY.—Not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall 

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a strategy to 

guide future United States policy and programs in Somalia to 

counter armed threats and support regional security, and in 

support of Somali and international efforts to foster economic 

growth and opportunity, counter armed threats to stability, and 

develop credible, transparent, and representative government 

systems and institutions. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
235 

(2) CONTENT OF STRATEGY.—The strategy required under 

paragraph (1) should include the following elements: 

(A) An interagency framework to plan, coordinate and review diplomatic, military, intelligence, development, and 

humanitarian elements of the United States policy regarding Somalia. 

(B) Plans and benchmarks for strengthening efforts, as 

appropriate, of the Government of Somalia, the African 

Union, and regional governments to stabilize the security 

situation within Somalia and further degrade al-Shabaab’s 

capabilities, in order to enable the eventual transfer of security operations to Somali security forces capable of— 

(i) maintaining and expanding security and stability 

within Somalia; 

(ii) confronting transnational security threats; and 

(iii) preventing human rights abuses. 

(C) A plan to support the development and 

professionalization of credible, civilian led, Somali security 

forces that are representative of the population, including 

the infrastructure and procedures required to ensure chain 

of custody and the safe storage of military equipment and 

an assessment of the benefits and risks of the provision of 

weaponry to the Somali security forces by the United 

States. 

(D) A description of United States national security objectives addressed through military-to-military cooperation activities with Somali security forces. 

(E) A description of security risks to any United States 

personnel conducting security cooperation activities within 

Somalia and plans to assist the Somali security forces in 

preventing infiltration and insider attacks, including 

through the application of lessons learned in United States 

military training efforts in Afghanistan. 

(F) A description of United States tools for monitoring 

and responding to violations of the United Nations Security 

Council arms embargo, charcoal ban, and other international agreements affecting the stability of Somalia. 

(G) A description of mechanisms for coordinating United 

States military and non-military assistance with other 

international donors, regional governments, and relevant 

multilateral organizations. 

(H) A plan to support the consolidation of political gains 

at the national level, while also encouraging and supporting complementary processes at the local and regional 

levels and encouraging improved collaboration among Somali national and regional administrations. 

(I) Any plans to increase United States diplomatic engagement with Somalia, including through the future establishment of an embassy or other diplomatic posts in 

Mogadishu. 

(J) Any other element the President determines appropriate. 

(3) REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

submission of the strategy required under paragraph (1), and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
236 

annually thereafter for three years, the President shall submit 

to the appropriate committees of Congress an update on implementation of the strategy and progress made in Somalia and 

associated benchmarks for security, stability, development, and 

governance. 

(4) FORM.—The strategy required under paragraph (1) and 

the reports required under paragraph (3) shall be submitted in 

unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(c) INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENT AND REPORT ON AL-SHABAAB.— 

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate 

committees of Congress a classified intelligence assessment of the 

terrorist organization known as al-Shabaab. Such assessment shall 

include the following: 

(1) A description of organizational structure, operational objectives, and funding sources for al-Shabaab. 

(2) An assessment of the extent to which al-Shabaab threatens 

security and stability within Somalia and surrounding countries. 

(3) An assessment of the extent to which al-Shabaab threatens 

the security of United States citizens or the national security or 

interests of the United States. 

(4) The description of the relationship between al-Shabaab 

and al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda affiliates. 

(5) An assessment of the capacity of the Government of Somalia to counter the threat posed by al-Shabaab. 

(6) An assessment of the capacity of regional countries and 

organizations, including the African Union, to counter the 

threat posed by al-Shabaab. 

(d) DESIGNATION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL FOR AFRICA EXPORT

POLICY.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, and for the following three years, the President shall designate an existing senior United States Government official with existing interagency authority for export policy for Africa to coordinate 

among various United States Government agencies existing export 

strategies with the goal of significantly increasing United States exports to Africa in real dollar value. 

(e) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select 

Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1207. ASSISTANCE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF JORDAN FOR BORDER SECURITY OPERATIONS. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, provide assistance on a reimbursement basis to the Government of Jordan for purposes of 

supporting and maintaining efforts of the armed forces of JorVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00268 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
237 

dan to increase security and sustain increased security along 

the border between Jordan and Syria. 

(2) FREQUENCY.—Assistance under this subsection may be 

provided on a quarterly basis. 

(3) CERTIFICATION.—Assistance may be provided under this 

subsection only if the Secretary of Defense certifies to the specified congressional committees that the Government of Jordan is 

continuing to support and maintain efforts of the armed forces 

of Jordan to increase security or sustain increased security 

along the border between Jordan and Syria. 

(b) FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR ASSISTANCE.—Amounts authorized to 

be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by title XV and available for 

reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to 

United States military operations pursuant to section 1233 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 

Law 110–181) as specified in the funding table in section 4302 may 

be used to provide assistance under the authority in subsection (a). 

(c) LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—The total amount of assistance 

provided under the authority in subsection (a) may not exceed 

$150,000,000. 

(2) PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense may not enter into any contractual obligation 

to provide assistance under the authority in subsection (a). 

(d) NOTICE BEFORE EXERCISE.—Not later than 15 days before 

providing assistance under the authority in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report setting forth a full description of the assistance to be 

provided, including the amount of assistance to be provided, and 

the timeline for the provision of such assistance. 

(e) SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this section, the 

term ‘‘specified congressional committees’’ means— 

(1) the congressional defense committees; and 

(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(f) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—No assistance may be provided 

under the authority in subsection (a) after December 31, 2015. 

SEC. 1208. SUPPORT OF FOREIGN FORCES PARTICIPATING IN OPERATIONS TO DISARM THE LORD’S RESISTANCE ARMY. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Pursuant to the policy established by the Lord’s 

Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act 

of 2009 (Public Law 111–172; 124 Stat. 1209), the Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of Secretary of State, provide logistic support, supplies, and services, and intelligence support, to foreign forces participating in operations to mitigate and eliminate the 

threat posed by the Lord’s Resistance Army as follows: 

(1) The national military forces of Uganda. 

(2) The national military forces of any other country determined by the Secretary of Defense to be participating in such 

operations. 

(b) FUNDING.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for the Department of Defense for operVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00269 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
238 

ation and maintenance, not more than $50,000,000 may be 

used in such fiscal year to provide support under subsection (a). 

(2) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.—Amounts 

available under this subsection for a fiscal year for support 

under the authority in subsection (a) may be used for support 

under that authority that begins in such fiscal year but ends in 

the next fiscal year. 

(c) LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the 

authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of support that 

is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law. 

(2) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014.—Of the 

amount available under subsection (b) for fiscal year 2014, not 

more than $37,500,000 may be obligated or expended to provide 

support under subsection (a) until the Secretary submits to the 

appropriate committees of Congress a report on Operation Observant Compass, including the specific goals of the campaign 

to counter the Lord’s Resistance Army, the precise metrics used 

to measure progress in the campaign, and the actions that will 

be taken to transition the campaign if it is determined that it 

is no longer necessary for the United States to support the mission of the campaign. 

(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON SUPPORT TO BE PROVIDED.—Not 

less than 15 days before the date on which funds are obligated to 

provide support under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice setting 

forth the following: 

(1) The type of support to be provided. 

(2) The national military forces to be supported. 

(3) The objectives of such support. 

(4) The estimated cost of such support. 

(5) The intended duration of such support. 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of 

the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of 

the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘logistic support, supplies, and services’’ has the 

meaning given that term in section 2350(1) of title 10, United 

States Code. 

(f) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided under this section may 

not be exercised after September 30, 2017. 

(g) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY.—Section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 

112–81; 125 Stat. 1624; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is repealed. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
239 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to 

Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq 

SEC. 1211. COMMANDERS’ EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM IN AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) ONE YEAR EXTENSION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1619), as amended by section 1221 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 

126 Stat. 1992), is further amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 

2013’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of subsection (a) 

of such section is amended by striking ‘‘FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013’’. 

(b) FUNDS AVAILABLE DURING FISCAL YEAR 2014.—Subsection (a) 

of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking 

‘‘$200,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$60,000,000’’. 

(c) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR QUARTERLY BRIEFINGS.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘AND BRIEFINGS’’; 

and 

(2) by striking paragraph (3). 

(d) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation 

with the Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, the 

Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, and the Government 

Accountability Office, shall submit to Congress a comprehensive report on lessons learned and best practices from execution of the 

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program (CERP) from Iraq and 

Afghanistan. 

(e) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection (d) 

shall include the following: 

(1) A description of any modifications to CERP since the commencement of the program. 

(2) A description of CERP best practices and lessons learned 

related to the following: 

(A) Requirements, training, and certifications for CERP 

managers in the field and headquarters. 

(B) Project planning, execution, management, closeout, 

sustainability, and transfer to host government. 

(C) Project approval process, including appropriate approval levels for higher-value projects. 

(D) Project monitoring and evaluation. 

(E) Control and accountability of funds. 

(F) Procurement procedures, including local procurement. 

(G) Processes to maintain flexibility and rapid implementation of funds, but retain accountability of CERP projects. 

(H) Reporting requirements to the Department of Defense 

and Congress. 

(I) Recommendations for the use of CERP in future contingency operations. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
240 

(J) Recommendations for developing a CERP handbook 

for use by future CERP administrators. 

(3) A description and assessment of the application of CERP 

practices in the success of reconstruction efforts and of commanders’ pursuit of their missions. 

SEC. 1212. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO USE FUNDS FOR 

REINTEGRATION ACTIVITIES IN AFGHANISTAN. 

Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392), as 

most recently amended by section 1218 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 

1990), is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘$35,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$25,000,000’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘for fiscal year 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘for 

fiscal year 2014’’; and 

(2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘December 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

SEC. 1213. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED TO 

UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS. 

(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public 

Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 

1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2000), is further amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT AVAILABLE.—Subsection (d)(1) of such 

section 1233, as so amended, is further amended by striking ‘‘during 

fiscal year 2013 may not exceed $1,650,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘during fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000’’. 

(c) EXTENSION OF NOTICE REQUIREMENT RELATING TO REIMBURSEMENT OF PAKISTAN FOR SUPPORT PROVIDED BY PAKISTAN.— 

Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 

1213(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1630), is further amended by 

striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2014’’. 

(d) EXTENSION OF LIMITATION ON REIMBURSEMENT OF PAKISTAN

PENDING CERTIFICATION ON PAKISTAN.—Subsection (d) of section 

1227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(126 Stat. 2000) is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘IN FISCAL YEAR

2013’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Effective as of the date of 

the enactment of this Act,’’ and all that follows through ‘‘remain 

available for obligation’’ and inserting ‘‘No amounts authorized 

to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 

2014 or any prior fiscal year’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
241 

SEC. 1214. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO SUPPORT OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE OF 

SECURITY COOPERATION IN IRAQ. 

(a) EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (f) 

of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘(f)’’ and all that follows through ‘‘fiscal year 

2013,’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(f) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY FOR ACTIVITIES OF OSCI.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—During fiscal year 2014,’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF TRAINING.—The training conducted under paragraph (1) shall include elements that promote 

the following: 

‘‘(A) Observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. 

‘‘(B) Military professionalism. 

‘‘(C) Respect for legitimate civilian authority within 

Iraq.’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—Subsection (c) of such section is 

amended by striking ‘‘2012’’ and all that follows through the period 

at the end and inserting ‘‘2014 may not exceed $209,000,000.’’. 

(c) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012 or fiscal year 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2012 or 2013, as the case may be,’’ 

and inserting ‘‘that fiscal year’’. 

(d) UPDATES OF REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF OSCI.—Section 

1211(d)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1983) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘UPDATE REQUIRED.—Not later than September 30, 2013,’’ and inserting ‘‘UPDATES REQUIRED.—Not 

later than September 30, 2013, and every 180 days thereafter 

until the authority in section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 expires,’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘including’’ and all that follows and inserting 

‘‘including the following: 

‘‘(A) A description of any changes to the specific element 

or process described in subparagraphs (A) through (F) of 

paragraph (2). 

‘‘(B) An evaluation of the activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq based on the measures of effectiveness described in paragraph (2)(F) and a discussion of any 

determinations to expand, alter, or terminate specific activities of the Office based on those measures. 

‘‘(C) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the training provided pursuant to section 1215(f)(2) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 in promoting respect 

for human rights, military professionalism, and respect for 

legitimate civilian authority in Iraq.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
242 

SEC. 1215. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY 

FOR PROGRAM TO DEVELOP AND CARRY OUT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 1217(f) of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4393), as most recently amended by section 

1219 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1991), is further amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following new 

subparagraph: ‘‘(C) Up to $250,000,000 made available to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for fiscal 

year 2014.’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘, or phase of a project,’’ after ‘‘each project’’; 

(B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph 

(D); and 

(C) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 

subparagraph (C): 

‘‘(C) An assessment of the capability of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to provide security for such 

project after January 1, 2015, including an estimate of the 

ANSF force levels, if any, required to secure such project. 

Such assessment should include the estimated costs of providing security and whether or not the Government of Afghanistan is committed to providing such security.’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following new 

subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) In the case of funds for fiscal year 2014, until September 30, 2015.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on October 1, 2013. 

(c) REPORT ON TRANSITION OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT.— (1) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the 

United States Agency for International Development, submit to 

the congressional defense committees a plan for the transition 

to the Government of Afghanistan, or a utility entity owned by 

the Government of Afghanistan, of the project management of 

projects funded with amounts authorized by this Act for the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund. Such transition shall be 

planned to be completed by not later December 31, 2014. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) 

shall include the following: 

(A) A description of the projects to be transitioned as described in that paragraph, the cost of such projects, and the 

timelines for completion and other key implementation 

milestones for such projects. 

(B) For each such project, the following: 

(i) An estimate of the financial and other requirements necessary to manage such project, and sustain 

the infrastructure developed through such project, on 

an annual basis after the completion of such project. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
243 

(ii) An assessment of the capacity of the Government 

of Afghanistan or such utility entity to manage such 

project, and maintain and use the infrastructure developed through such project, after the completion of such 

project. 

(iii) A description of any arrangements, and an estimate of associated costs, to support the Government of 

Afghanistan or such utility entity if the Government of 

Afghanistan or such utility entity, as the case may be, 

lacks the capacity (in either financial or human resources) to manage such project, or sustain the infrastructure developed through such project, after the completion of such project. 

(C) An assessment of the ministries or organizations of 

Afghanistan that will be responsible for the management of 

such projects after transition, including an assessment of 

any critical institutional shortfalls of such ministries and 

organizations that must be addressed for such ministries 

and organization to acquire the capacity required to assume project management responsibilities for such projects. 

SEC. 1216. REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN IN AMOUNT EQUIVALENT 

TO 100 PERCENT OF ALL TAXES ASSESSED BY AFGHANISTAN TO EXTENT SUCH TAXES ARE NOT REIMBURSED BY 

AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) REQUIREMENT TO WITHHOLD ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN.— 

An amount equivalent to 100 percent of the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance shall be withheld by the Secretary 

of Defense from obligation from funds appropriated for such assistance for fiscal year 2014 to the extent that the Secretary of Defense 

certifies and reports in writing to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives that such taxes have 

not been reimbursed by the Government of Afghanistan to the Department of Defense or the grantee, contractor, or subcontractor concerned. 

(b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the 

requirement in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such 

a waiver is necessary to achieve United States goals in Afghanistan. 

(c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the total taxes assessed during fiscal year 

2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on all Department of Defense assistance. 

(d) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ASSISTANCE DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Department of Defense assistance’’ means funds provided during fiscal year 2013 to Afghanistan by the Department of 

Defense, either directly or through grantees, contractors, or subcontractors. 

(e) TERMINATION.—This section shall terminate at the close of the 

date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

a notification that the United States and Afghanistan have signed 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
244 

a bilateral security agreement and such agreement has entered into 

force. 

SEC. 1217. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN AUTHORITIES FOR SUPPORT OF 

FOREIGN FORCES SUPPORTING OR PARTICIPATING WITH 

THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. 

(a) LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR COALITION FORCES SUPPORTING

UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.—Section 

1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 

(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended by 

section 1216(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1989), is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’; 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘in fiscal year 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘during the period beginning on October 1, 2013, and 

ending on December 31, 2014,’’; and 

(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘of fiscal year 2013’’ and 

inserting ‘‘through December 31, 2014’’. 

(b) USE OF ACQUISITION AND CROSS-SERVICING AGREEMENTS TO

LEND CERTAIN MILITARY EQUIPMENT TO CERTAIN FOREIGN FORCES

FOR PERSONNEL PROTECTION AND SURVIVABILITY.—Section 1202(e) 

of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2413), as most recently 

amended by section 1202(b) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1621), is 

further amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2014’’ and inserting 

‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

SEC. 1218. EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE IRAQI SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA PROGRAM. 

The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (8 U.S.C. 1157 note) is 

amended— 

(1) in section 1242, by striking subsection (c) and inserting 

the following: 

‘‘(c) IMPROVED APPLICATION PROCESS.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 

Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall improve the efficiency by which applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a), are processed so 

that all steps under the control of the respective departments incidental to the issuance of such visas, including required 

screenings and background checks, should be completed not 

later than 9 months after the date on which an eligible alien 

submits all required materials to complete an application for 

such visa. 

‘‘(2) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ability of a Secretary referred to in paragraph (1) to take longer than 9 months to complete those steps 

incidental to the issuance of such visas in high-risk cases for 

which satisfaction of national security concerns requires additional time. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
245 

‘‘(d) REPRESENTATION.—An alien applying for admission to the 

United States pursuant to this subtitle may be represented during 

the application process, including at relevant interviews and examinations, by an attorney or other accredited representative. Such representation shall not be at the expense of the United States Government.’’; 

(2) in section 1244— 

(A) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (4)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘A recommendation’’ and inserting 

the following: 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under subparagraph (B), a recommendation’’; and 

(II) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) REVIEW PROCESS FOR DENIAL BY CHIEF OF MISSION.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—An applicant who has been denied 

Chief of Mission approval required by subparagraph 

(A) shall— 

‘‘(I) receive a written decision that provides, to 

the maximum extent feasible, information describing the basis for the denial, including the facts 

and inferences underlying the individual determination; and 

‘‘(II) be provided not more than one written appeal— 

‘‘(aa) that shall be submitted not more than 

120 days after the date that the applicant receives such decision in writing; and 

‘‘(bb) that may request reopening of such decision and provide additional information, 

clarify existing information, or explain any 

unfavorable information. 

‘‘(ii) IRAQI SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA COORDINATOR.— 

The Secretary of State shall designate, in the Embassy 

of the United States in Baghdad, Iraq, an Iraqi Special 

Immigrant Visa Coordinator responsible for overseeing 

the efficiency and integrity of the processing of special 

immigrant visas under this section, who shall be 

given— 

‘‘(I) sufficiently high security clearance to review 

information supporting Chief of Mission denials if 

an appeal of a denial is filed; 

‘‘(II) responsibility for ensuring that an applicant described in clause (i) receives the information described in clause (i)(I); and 

‘‘(III) responsibility for ensuring that every applicant is provided a reasonable opportunity to provide additional information, clarify existing information, or explain any unfavorable information 

pursuant to clause (i)(II).’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(5) EVIDENCE OF SERIOUS THREAT.—A credible sworn statement depicting dangerous country conditions, together with offiVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00277 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
246 

cial evidence of such country conditions from the United States 

Government, should be considered as a factor in determination 

of whether the alien has experienced or is experiencing an ongoing serious threat as a consequence of the alien’s employment by 

the United States Government for purposes of paragraph 

(1)(D).’’; and 

(B) in subsection (c)(3), by striking subparagraph (C) and 

inserting the following: 

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF VISAS.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The total number of principal 

aliens who may be provided special immigrant status 

under this section after January 1, 2014, shall be not 

more than 2500. 

‘‘(ii) EMPLOYMENT PERIOD.—The 1-year period during which the principal alien is required to have been 

employed by or on behalf of the United States Government in Iraq under subsection (b)(1)(B) shall begin on 

or after March 20, 2003, and end on or before September 30, 2013. 

‘‘(iii) APPLICATION DEADLINE.—The principal alien 

seeking special immigrant status under this subparagraph shall apply to the Chief of Mission in accordance 

with subsection (b)(4) not later than September 30, 

2014.’’; and 

(3) in section 1248, by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(f) REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of 

Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit a report, with a classified annex, if necessary, to— 

‘‘(A) the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Armed Services of 

the Senate; and 

‘‘(B) the Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Armed Services of 

the House of Representatives. 

‘‘(2) CONTENTS.—The report submitted under paragraph (1) 

shall describe the implementation of improvements to the processing of applications for special immigrant visas under section 

1244(a), including information relating to— 

‘‘(A) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special 

immigrant status, which shall— 

‘‘(i) support immigration security; and 

‘‘(ii) provide for the orderly processing of such applications without significant delay; 

‘‘(B) the financial, security, and personnel considerations 

and resources necessary to carry out this subtitle; 

‘‘(C) the number of aliens who have applied for special 

immigrant visas under section 1244 during each month of 

the preceding fiscal year; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
247 

‘‘(D) the reasons for the failure to process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 months; 

‘‘(E) the total number of applications that are pending 

due to the failure— 

‘‘(i) to receive approval from the Chief of Mission; 

‘‘(ii) of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to 

complete the adjudication of the Form I–360; 

‘‘(iii) to conduct a visa interview; or 

‘‘(iv) to issue the visa to an eligible alien; 

‘‘(F) the average wait times for an applicant at each of 

the stages described in subparagraph (E); 

‘‘(G) the number of denials or rejections at each of the 

stages described in subparagraph (E); and 

‘‘(H) the reasons for denials by the Chief of Mission based 

on the categories already made available to denied special 

immigrant visa applicants in the denial letter sent to them 

by the Chief of Mission. 

‘‘(g) PUBLIC QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Not later than 120 days after 

the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, the Secretary 

of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation 

with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a report on the website 

of the Department of State that describes the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications for special immigrant visas under section 1244(a) are processed, including information described in subparagraphs (C) through (H) of subsection (f)(2). 

‘‘(h) SENIOR COORDINATING OFFICIALS.— ‘‘(1) REQUIREMENT TO DESIGNATE.—The Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Defense shall each designate a senior coordinating official, with 

sufficient expertise, authority, and resources, to carry out the 

duties described in paragraph (2), with regard to the issuance 

of special immigrant visas under this subtitle and the Afghan 

Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note). 

‘‘(2) DUTIES.—Each senior coordinating official designated 

under paragraph (1) shall— 

‘‘(A) develop proposals to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the process for issuing special immigrant visas 

under this subtitle and the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 

2009; 

‘‘(B) coordinate and monitor the implementation of such 

proposals; 

‘‘(C) include such proposals in the report required by subsection (f) and in each quarterly report required by subsection (g); and 

‘‘(D) implement appropriate actions as authorized by law 

to carry out the improvements described in the report required by subsection (f). 

‘‘(3) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 days after 

the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of Homeland Security, 

the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of Defense shall each 

submit to the committees set out in subparagraphs (A) and (B) 

of subsection (f)(1) the name and title of the senior coordinating 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
248 

official designated under paragraph (1) by each such Secretary, 

along with a description of the relevant expertise, authority, 

and resources of such official.’’. 

SEC. 1219. IMPROVEMENT OF THE AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA 

PROGRAM. 

Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 

U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in subparagraph (D)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘A recommendation’’ and inserting the 

following: 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under clause 

(ii), a recommendation’’; and 

(ii) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ii) REVIEW PROCESS FOR DENIAL BY CHIEF OF MIS- SION.— 

‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—An applicant who has been 

denied Chief of Mission approval shall— 

‘‘(aa) receive a written decision that provides, to the maximum extent feasible, information describing the basis for the denial, including the facts and inferences underlying the 

individual determination; and 

‘‘(bb) be provided not more than one written 

appeal— 

‘‘(AA) that shall be submitted not more 

than 120 days after the date that the applicant receives such decision in writing; 

and 

‘‘(BB) that may request reopening of 

such decision and provide additional information, clarify existing information, or 

explain any unfavorable information. 

‘‘(II) AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA COORDINATOR.—The Secretary of State shall designate, in 

the Embassy of the United States in Kabul, Afghanistan, an Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Coordinator responsible for overseeing the efficiency 

and integrity of the processing of special immigrant visas under this section, who shall be 

given— 

‘‘(aa) sufficiently high security clearance to 

review information supporting Chief of Mission denials if an appeal of a denial is filed; 

‘‘(bb) responsibility for ensuring that an applicant described in subclause (I) receives the 

information described in subclause (I)(aa); 

and 

‘‘(cc) responsibility for ensuring that every 

applicant is provided a reasonable opportunity 

to provide additional information, clarify existing information, or explain any unfavorable 

information pursuant to clause (I)(bb).’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
249 

‘‘(E) EVIDENCE OF SERIOUS THREAT.—A credible sworn 

statement depicting dangerous country conditions, together 

with official evidence of such country conditions from the 

United States Government, should be considered as a factor 

in determination of whether the alien has experienced or is 

experiencing an ongoing serious threat as a consequence of 

the alien’s employment by the United States Government 

for purposes of subparagraph (A)(iv). 

‘‘(F) REPRESENTATION.—An alien applying for admission 

to the United States pursuant to this title may be represented during the application process, including at relevant interviews and examinations, by an attorney or other 

accredited representative. Such representation shall not be 

at the expense of the United States Government.’’; 

(2) in paragraph (4)— 

(A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘PROHIBITION ON FEES.— 

’’ and inserting ‘‘APPLICATION PROCESS.—’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall improve the efficiency by which applications for special immigrant visas under paragraph (1), 

are processed so that all steps under the control of the respective departments incidental to the issuance of such 

visas, including required screenings and background 

checks, should be completed not later than 9 months after 

the date on which an eligible alien submits all required 

materials to complete an application for such visa. 

‘‘(B) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to limit the ability of a Secretary referred to in 

subparagraph (A) to take longer than 9 months to complete 

those steps incidental to the issuance of such visas in highrisk cases for which satisfaction of national security concerns requires additional time. 

‘‘(C) PROHIBITION ON FEES.—The Secretary’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(12) REPORT ON IMPROVEMENTS.— 

‘‘(A) REQUIREMENT FOR REPORT.—Not later than 120 

days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, the Secretary of 

State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report, with a classified 

annex, if necessary. 

‘‘(B) CONTENTS.—The report required by subparagraph 

(A) shall describe the implementation of improvements to 

the processing of applications for special immigrant visas 

under this subsection, including information relating to— 

‘‘(i) enhancing existing systems for conducting background and security checks of persons applying for special immigrant status, which shall— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
250 

‘‘(I) support immigration security; and 

‘‘(II) provide for the orderly processing of such 

applications without significant delay; 

‘‘(ii) the financial, security, and personnel considerations and resources necessary to carry out this section; 

‘‘(iii) the number of aliens who have applied for special immigrant visas under this subsection during each 

month of the preceding fiscal year; 

‘‘(iv) the reasons for the failure to process any applications that have been pending for longer than 9 

months; 

‘‘(v) the total number of applications that are pending due to the failure— 

‘‘(I) to receive approval from the Chief of Mission; 

‘‘(II) of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to complete the adjudication of the Form I– 

360; 

‘‘(III) to conduct a visa interview; or 

‘‘(IV) to issue the visa to an eligible alien; 

‘‘(vi) the average wait times for an applicant at each 

of the stages described in clause (v); 

‘‘(vii) the number of denials or rejections at each of 

the stages described in clause (v); and 

‘‘(viii) the reasons for denials by the Chief of Mission 

based on the categories already made available to denied special immigrant visa applicants in the denial 

letter sent to them by the Chief of Mission. 

‘‘(13) PUBLIC QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Not later than 120 days 

after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, and every 3 months thereafter, 

the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, 

in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall publish a 

report on the website of the Department of State that describes 

the efficiency improvements made in the process by which applications for special immigrant visas under this subsection are 

processed, including information described in clauses (iii) 

through (viii) of paragraph (12)(B).’’. 

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to 

Afghanistan Post 2014 

SEC. 1221. REPORT ON PLANS TO DISRUPT AND DEGRADE HAQQANI 

NETWORK ACTIVITIES AND FINANCES. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) disrupting and degrading the Haqqani Network should be 

a high priority; and 

(2) the Administration should use the full extent of its authority to deny the organization the finances required to carry out 

its activities. 

(b) REPORT ON ACTIVITIES AND PLAN TO DISRUPT AND DEGRADE

HAQQANI NETWORK ACTIVITIES AND FINANCES.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
251 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than nine months after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall report to 

the appropriate committees of Congress on activities and the 

plan to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities and finances. 

(2) COORDINATION.—The report required by paragraph (1) 

shall be prepared by the Secretary of Defense, in coordination 

with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the 

Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, and 

any other department or agency of the United States Government that has lead responsibility for activities directed at disrupting and degrading the Haqqani Network. 

(3) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall 

include the following: 

(A) A description of the current activities of the Department of Defense, the Department of State, the Department 

of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the elements of the intelligence community to disrupt and degrade 

Haqqani Network activities, finances, and resources. 

(B) An assessment of the intelligence community— 

(i) of the operations of the Haqqani Network in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and its activities outside the 

region; and 

(ii) of the relationships, networks, and vulnerabilities 

of the Haqqani Network, including with Pakistan’s 

military, intelligence services, and government officials, 

including provincial and district officials. 

(C) A review of the plans and intentions of the Haqqani 

Network with respect to the continued drawdown of United 

States and coalition troops. 

(D) A review of the current United States policies, activities, and funding, and a description of a plan, for applying 

sustained and systemic pressure against the Haqqani Network’s financial infrastructure, including— 

(i) identification of the agencies that would participate in implementing the plan; 

(ii) a description of the legal authorities under which 

the plan would be conducted; 

(iii) a description of the objectives and desired outcomes of the plan, including specific steps to achieve 

these objectives and outcomes; 

(iv) metrics to measure the success of the plan; and 

(v) the identity of the agency or office to be designated as the lead agency in implementing the plan. 

(E) An examination of the extent, if any, to which current 

United States and coalition contracting processes have 

furthered the financial interests of the Haqqani Network, 

and how the activities and plans specified in paragraph (1) 

would mitigate the unintended consequences of such processes. 

(F) An assessment of formal and informal business sectors penetrated by the Haqqani Network in Afghanistan, 

Pakistan, and other countries, particularly in the Persian 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
252 

Gulf region, and a description of steps to counter these activities. 

(G) An estimate of costs associated with the implementation of the plan to disrupt and degrade the Haqqani Network’s financial activities. 

(H) A description of how activities and plans specified in 

paragraph (1) fit in the broader United States efforts to stabilize Afghanistan and prevent the region from being a safe 

haven for al Qaeda and its affiliates. 

(4) UPDATE OF REPORT ON ACTIVITIES AND PLAN.—Not later 

than 180 days after the submission of the report required by 

paragraph (1), the President shall submit an update of the report to the appropriate committees of Congress. 

(5) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) and the update required by paragraph (4) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—The term ‘‘appropriate committees of Congress’’ means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence 

of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

(2) INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.—The term ‘‘intelligence community’’ has the meaning given that term in section 3(4) of the 

National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). 

SEC. 1222. COMPLETION OF ACCELERATED TRANSITION OF SECURITY 

RESPONSIBILITY FROM UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES 

TO THE AFGHAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—It is the policy of the United States, in coordination with the Government of Afghanistan, North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization (NATO) member countries, and other allies in Afghanistan, that— 

(1) the accelerated transition of security responsibility from 

United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security 

Forces and the associated draw down of United States Armed 

Forces from Afghanistan shall be completed by not later than 

December 31, 2014; 

(2) the United States shall support an Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace negotiation process leading to a political settlement of the conflict in Afghanistan, with the goal of establishing a secure and independent Afghanistan and promoting 

regional security and stability; and 

(3) any political settlement resulting from such peace negotiations must result in insurgent groups breaking ties with al 

Qaeda, renouncing violence, and accepting the Afghanistan constitution, including its protections for women and minorities. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that, before 

making a public announcement regarding a decision on a United 

States military presence in Afghanistan after December 31, 2014, 

the President should consult with Congress regarding the size, mission, and estimated duration of such a presence. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
253 

(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed so as to limit or prohibit any authority of the President 

to modify the military strategy, tactics, and operations of United 

States Armed Forces as such Armed Forces draw down from Afghanistan. 

SEC. 1223. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE PLAN. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select 

Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a Department of Defense 

plan regarding covered defense intelligence assets in relation to the 

drawdown of the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan. Such 

plan shall include— 

(1) a description of the covered defense intelligence assets; 

(2) a description of any such assets to remain in Afghanistan 

after December 31, 2014, to continue to support military operations; 

(3) a description of any such assets that will be or have been 

reallocated to other locations outside of the United States in 

support of the Department of Defense; 

(4) the defense intelligence priorities that will be or have been 

addressed with the reallocation of such assets from Afghanistan; 

(5) the necessary logistics, operations, and maintenance plans 

to operate in the locations where such assets will be or have 

been reallocated, including personnel, basing, and any host 

country agreements; and 

(6) a description of any such assets that will be or have been 

returned to the United States. 

(b) COVERED DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE ASSETS DEFINED.—In this 

section, the term ‘‘covered defense intelligence assets’’ means Department of Defense intelligence assets and personnel supporting military operations in Afghanistan at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 1224. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN AUTHORITIES FOR AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) LIMITATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 to 

carry out each of the provisions of law described in paragraph 

(2), not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended 

until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense 

submits to the specified congressional committees the certification described in subsection (b). 

(2) PROVISIONS OF LAW.—The provisions of law referred to in 

paragraph (1) are the following: 

(A) Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 

1619; relating to the Commanders’ Emergency Response 

Program in Afghanistan). 

(B) Section 1217 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
254 

124 Stat. 4393; relating to authority for program to develop 

and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan). 

(C) Section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 

428; relating to the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund). 

(b) CERTIFICATION DESCRIBED.—The certification referred to in 

subsection (a) is a certification of the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, that the United States and Afghanistan have signed a bilateral security agreement that is in the 

national security interests of the United States. 

(c) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of 

Defense may waive the applicability of the limitation in subsection 

(a)(1) if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in the national 

security interests of the United States. 

(d) SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—In this section, the 

term ‘‘specified congressional committees’’ means— 

(1) the congressional defense committees; and 

(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran 

SEC. 1231. REPORT ON UNITED STATES MILITARY PARTNERSHIP WITH 

GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COUNTRIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the United States military partnership with 

Gulf Cooperation Council countries. 

(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An explanation of the steps that the Department of Defense has taken and is planning to take to improve the coordination, effectiveness, and interoperability of the regional missile 

defense systems and capabilities of the United States and Gulf 

Cooperation Council countries, both bilaterally and multilaterally. 

(2) An outline of the defense agreements with Gulf Cooperation Council countries, including caveats and restrictions on 

United States operations. 

(3) An outline of United States efforts in Gulf Cooperation 

Council countries that are funded by overseas contingency operations funding, an explanation of overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts, and a plan to transition overseas contingency operations funding for such efforts to longterm, sustainable funding sources. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form. 

SEC. 1232. ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS IN ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY 

POWER OF IRAN. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1245(b)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 

2542) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
255 

(1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 

and inserting ‘‘; and’’ ; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(E) a description of the structure of Iran’s global network of terrorist and criminal groups and an analysis of 

the capability of such network of groups and how such network of groups operates to support and reinforce Iran’s 

grand strategy.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section 

shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall 

apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under section 

1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2010, as so amended, on or after that date. 

SEC. 1233. INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE PROGRAMS AT 

TRAINING LOCATIONS IN SOUTHWEST ASIA. 

Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 

2347c(c)(1)) is amended— 

(1) in the first sentence, by inserting after ‘‘programs’’ the following: ‘‘and integrated air and missile defense programs’’; and 

(2) in the second sentence, by adding at the end before the period the following: ‘‘and integrated air and missile defense 

training’’. 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters 

SEC. 1241. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-CONVENTIONAL ASSISTED RECOVERY CAPABILITIES. 

Section 943(h) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), 

as amended by section 1205(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624), 

is further amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

SEC. 1242. ELEMENT ON 5TH GENERATION FIGHTER PROGRAM IN ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

Section 1202(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by adding at the end 

the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(20) The status of the 5th generation fighter program of the 

People’s Republic of China, including an assessment of each individual aircraft type, estimated initial and full operational capability dates, and the ability of such aircraft to provide air superiority.’’. 

SEC. 1243. REPORT ON POSTURE AND READINESS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES TO RESPOND TO AN ATTACK OR OTHER CONTINGENCY AGAINST UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC FACILITIES 

OVERSEAS. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than April 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State 

and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the posture and readiness 

of the United States Armed Forces to respond to a request by the 

Department of State to supplement or support existing embassy seVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00287 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
256 

curity assets in the case of an attack or other contingency against 

a United States diplomatic facility overseas. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) A description and assessment of the posture and readiness 

of the United States Armed Forces that are expected or available to be tasked to supplement or support United States embassy security, including an assessment of the following: 

(A) Forward deployed assets that are capable of responding to an attack or other contingency against a United 

States diplomatic facility overseas. 

(B) Department of Defense support of the efforts of the 

Department of State to improve diplomatic security at 

United States diplomatic facilities overseas (in terms of 

both personnel and installations). 

(C) Potential enhancements of intelligence support to ensure that the United States Armed Forces in the vicinity of 

high threat, high risk United States diplomatic facilities 

overseas are in an appropriate posture to respond to an attack or other contingency against such facilities. 

(2) A description of any unfulfilled Marine Security Detachment requirements with respect to high threat, high risk United 

States diplomatic facilities overseas, a description and assessment of mitigation efforts to meet such requirements, and a 

schedule for meeting such requirements. 

(c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form. 

SEC. 1244. LIMITATION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF REGIONAL SPECIAL 

OPERATIONS FORCES COORDINATION CENTERS. 

(a) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated 

by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the 

Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to establish 

Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers (RSCCs). 

(b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional committees specified in subsection (c) a report on the following: 

(1) A detailed description of the intent and purpose of the 

RSCCs concept. 

(2) Defined and validated requirements justifying the establishment of RSCCs or similar entities within each geographic 

combatant command, to include how such RSCCs or similar 

entities have been coordinated and de-conflicted with existing 

regional and multilateral frameworks or approaches. 

(3) The relevance to and coordination with other multilateral 

engagement activities and academic institutions supported by 

the geographic combatant commanders and the Department of 

State. 

(4) Cost estimates across the Future Years Defense Program 

for RSCCs or similar entities, to include estimates of contributions of participating nations. 

(5) Any legislative authorities that may be needed to establish 

RSCCs or similar entities. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
257 

(6) Any other matters that the Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State determines appropriate. 

(c) SPECIFIED CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The congressional 

committees referred to in subsection (b) are— 

(1) the congressional defense committees; and 

(2) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1245. ADDITIONAL REPORTS ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA. 

(a) REPORT.—Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 

125 Stat. 1641), as amended by section 1292 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 2042), is further amended by striking ‘‘November 1, 2012, and 

November 1, 2013,’’ and inserting ‘‘November 1, 2013, November 1, 

2015, and November 1, 2017,’’. 

(b) UPDATE.—Section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) UPDATE.—The Secretary of Defense shall revise or supplement 

the most recent report submitted pursuant to subsection (a) if, in the 

Secretary’s estimation, interim events or developments occurring in 

a period between reports required under subsection (a) warrant revision or supplement.’’. 

SEC. 1246. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON MISSILE DEFENSE COOPERATION 

WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND LIMITATIONS ON 

PROVIDING CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION TO 

THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

(a) FINDING.—Congress finds that the President certified to the 

Senate on February 2, 2011, pursuant to condition (5) of the resolution of the Senate giving the advice and consent of the Senate to the 

ratification of the Treaty Between the United States of America and 

the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and 

Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (commonly referred to as the 

‘‘New START Treaty’’), signed in Prague on April 8, 2010, the following: ‘‘The New START Treaty does not require, at any point during which it will be in force, the United States to provide to the Russian Federation telemetric information under Article IX of the New 

START Treaty, Part Seven of the Protocol, and the Annex on Telemetric Information to the Protocol for the launch of (a) any missile 

defense interceptor, as defined in paragraph 44 of Part One of the 

Protocol to the New START Treaty; (b) any satellite launches, missile defense sensor targets, and missile defense intercept targets, the 

launch of which uses the first stage of an existing type of United 

States intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) or submarinelaunched ballistic missile (SLBM) listed in paragraph 8 of Article 

III of the New START Treaty; or (c) any missile described in clause 

(a) of paragraph 7 of Article III of the New START Treaty.’’. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
258 

(1) as stated in declaration (1) of the resolution of the Senate 

giving the advice and consent of the Senate to the ratification 

of the New START Treaty— 

(A) ‘‘further limitations on the missile defense capabilities 

of the United States are not in the national security interest 

of the United States’’; and 

(B) ‘‘[t]he New START Treaty and the April 7, 2010, unilateral statement of the Russian Federation on missile defense do not limit in any way, and shall not be interpreted 

as limiting, activities that the United States Government 

currently plans or that might be required over the duration 

of the New START Treaty to protect the United States pursuant to the National Missile Defense Act of 1999, or to 

protect United States Armed Forces and United States allies from limited ballistic missile attack, including further 

planned enhancements to the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system and all phases of the Phased Adaptive Approach to missile defense in Europe.’’; 

(2) as stated in declaration (2) of the resolution of the Senate 

giving the advice and consent of the Senate to the ratification 

of the New START Treaty, ‘‘the United States will welcome 

steps by the Russian Federation also to adopt a fundamentally 

defensive strategic posture that no longer views robust strategic 

defensive capabilities as undermining the overall strategic balance, and stands ready to cooperate with the Russian Federation on strategic defensive capabilities, as long as such cooperation is aimed at fostering and in no way constrains the defensive capabilities of both sides’’; 

(3) any missile defense cooperation with the Russian Federation should not in any way limit United States’ or NATO’s missile defense capabilities, and should be mutually beneficial and 

reciprocal in nature; 

(4) the United States should not provide the Russian Federation with sensitive missile defense information that would in 

any way compromise United States national security, including 

‘‘hit-to-kill’’ technology and telemetry data for missile defense 

interceptors or target vehicles; and 

(5) the sovereignty of the United States and its ability to unilaterally pursue its own missile defense program shall be protected. 

(c) LIMITATIONS ON PROVIDING CERTAIN MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.— 

(1) CERTAIN ‘‘HIT-TO-KILL’’ TECHNOLOGY AND TELEMETRY

DATA.—No funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise 

made available for fiscal years 2014 through 2016 for the Department of Defense may be used to provide the Russian Federation with ‘‘hit-to-kill’’ technology and telemetry data for missile defense interceptors or target vehicles. 

(2) OTHER SENSITIVE MISSILE DEFENSE INFORMATION.—No 

funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense may be 

used to provide the Russian Federation with sensitive missile 

defense information that would in any way compromise United 

States national security. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
259 

(3) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—If the Secretary of Defense intends to provide the Russian Federation with any sensitive missile defense information that the Secretary determines 

will not compromise United States national security, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of the 

Secretary’s intent to provide such information not less than 7 

days prior to the provision of such information, including an 

explanation of the reasons for providing the information and 

the reasons why providing the information will not compromise 

United States national security. 

SEC. 1247. AMENDMENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT UNDER ARMS CONTROL 

AND DISARMAMENT ACT. 

(a) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—Section 403 of 

the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) is 

amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives and to the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate’’ and inserting ‘‘the appropriate 

congressional committees’’; 

(2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘Congress’’ and inserting ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ 

means— 

‘‘(1) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on 

Armed Services, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

Senate; and 

‘‘(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on 

Armed Services, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.’’. 

(b) CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING.—Section 403 of the Arms Control 

and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), as amended by subsection 

(a) of this section, is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING.—Not later than May 15 of each 

year, the President shall provide to the appropriate congressional 

committees a briefing on the most-recent report required by this section.’’. 

SEC. 1248. REPORT ON ACTIONS TO REDUCE SUPPORT FOR BALLISTIC 

MISSILE PROLIFERATION. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the United States Government should develop a plan to reduce the spread of technology and expertise that could support 

the ballistic missile development programs of Iran, North 

Korea, and Syria, as well as any other nation determined by the 

United States Government to be a ballistic missile proliferation 

risk; and 

(2) such plan should include efforts to secure the cooperation 

of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China 

to help reduce the spread of such ballistic missile technology 

and expertise. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
260 

(b) REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 240 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with appropriate Federal departments and agencies, shall 

submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on 

steps that have been taken, and that are planned to be taken, 

to reduce the spread of technology and expertise that could support the ballistic missile development programs of Iran, North 

Korea, and Syria, as well as any other nation the Secretary determines to be a ballistic missile proliferation risk. 

(2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate 

congressional committees’’ means— 

(A) the congressional defense committees; 

(B) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate 

and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

House of Representatives; and 

(C) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(3) FORM.—The report required by this subsection shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 

annex, if necessary. 

SEC. 1249. REPORTS ON INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS RELATING TO 

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) REPORTS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall semi-annually submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on agreements described in subsection (b) 

which have entered into force, have been amended, or have been terminated during the previous 6-month period and with respect to 

which such agreements were previously notified by the Secretary of 

State to the Congress pursuant to section 112b of title 1, United 

States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Case-Zablocki Act’’). 

(b) AGREEMENTS DESCRIBED.—Agreements referred to in subsection (a) are agreements relating to matters primarily or significantly related to or involving the Department of Defense, including, 

but not limited to— 

(1) matters such as where the Department of Defense will 

carry out activities under the agreement; and 

(2) matters such as where Department of Defense personnel 

are able to be present in a foreign country in light of the status 

protections, exemptions, and responsibilities afforded by the 

agreement. 

(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to supersede the requirements of section 112b of title 1, 

United States Code. 

(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect on the date of 

the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to an agreement described in subsection (b) on or after that date. 

(e) TERMINATION.—The section shall terminate at the close of December 31, 2019. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
261 

SEC. 1250. REVISION OF STATUTORY REFERENCES TO FORMER NATO 

SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS AND RELATED NATO AGREEMENTS. 

(a) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Section 2350d of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘NATO Maintenance and Supply Organization’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘NATO Support Organization and its executive agencies’’; 

(2) in subsection (a)(1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Weapon System Partnership Agreements’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Support Partnership Agreements’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘a specific weapon 

system’’ and inserting ‘‘activities’’; and 

(3) in subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), by striking ‘‘Weapon 

System Partnership Agreement’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Support Partnership Agreement’’. 

(b) ARMS EXPORT CONTROL ACT.—Section 21(e)(3) of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761(e)(3)) is amended— 

(1) in subparagraphs (A) and (C)(i), by striking ‘‘Maintenance 

and Supply Agency of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’’ 

and inserting ‘‘North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 

Support Organization and its executive agencies’’; 

(2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ‘‘weapon system partnership agreement’’ and inserting ‘‘support partnership agreement’’; and 

(3) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking ‘‘a specific weapon 

system’’ and inserting ‘‘activities’’. 

SEC. 1251. EXECUTIVE AGREEMENTS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

RELATING TO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that any executive agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation relating to ballistic missile defense should not limit the development or deployment of ballistic missile defense systems or capabilities of the United States or of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 

(b) BRIEFING.—Prior to signing an executive agreement with the 

Russian Federation relating to ballistic missile defense, the President, or the President’s designee, shall brief the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives on the objectives and contents of the executive agreement. 

SEC. 1252. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of 

force against Syria or Iran. 

SEC. 1253. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT 

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 

for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or to make any change to existing 

programs, projects, or activities as approved by Congress in furtherance of, pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms Trade 

Treaty, unless the Arms Trade Treaty has received the advice and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
262 

consent of the Senate and has been the subject of implementing legislation, as required, by the Congress. 

(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be 

construed to preclude the Department of Defense from assisting foreign countries in bringing their laws and regulations up to United 

States standards. 

SEC. 1254. REPORT ON MILITARY AND SECURITY DEVELOPMENTS INVOLVING THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

(a) REPORT.—Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report 

on the security and military strategy of the Russian Federation. 

(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the security priorities and objectives of 

Russia. 

(2) The goals and factors shaping Russian security and military strategy, including military spending and investment priorities. 

(3) An assessment of the Russian military’s force structure. 

(4) Recent developments in Russian military doctrine and 

training. 

(5) The current state of United States military-to-military cooperation with Russia’s armed forces, which shall include the 

following: 

(A) A comprehensive and coordinated strategy for such 

military-to-military cooperation. 

(B) A summary of all such military-to-military cooperation during the one-year period preceding the report, including a summary of topics discussed. 

(C) A description of such military-to-military cooperation 

planned for the 12-month period following such report. 

(D) The Secretary’s assessment of the benefits the Russians expect to gain from such military-to-military cooperation. 

(E) The Secretary’s assessment of the benefits the Department of Defense expects to gain from such military-to-military cooperation, and any concerns regarding such cooperation. 

(F) The Secretary’s assessment of how such military-tomilitary cooperation fit into the larger security relationship 

between the United States and the Russian Federation. 

(6) A description of Russia’s key military-to-military relationships with other countries, and how these relationships fit into 

Russia’s larger security and military strategy. 

(7) Other military and security developments involving Russia that the Secretary of Defense considers relevant to United 

States national security. 

(c) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

(d) DEFINITION.—In this section the term ‘‘specified congressional 

committees’’ means— 

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
263 

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 

Foreign Relations of the Senate. 

SEC. 1255. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS OR AGREEMENTS WITH ROSOBORONEXPORT. 

(a) PROHIBITION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 may be 

used to enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, to make a grant, to, or to provide a loan 

or loan guarantee to Rosoboronexport. 

(b) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of 

Defense may waive the applicability of subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States. 

(c) REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO USE OF FUNDS PURSUANT TO

WAIVER.— 

(1) NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE OBLIGATION OF FUNDS.— 

Not later than 30 days before obligating funds pursuant to the 

waiver under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a notice on the obligation of funds pursuant to 

the waiver. 

(2) REPORT.—Not later than 15 days after the submittal of 

the notice under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to 

Congress a report setting forth the following: 

(A) An assessment of the number, if any, of S–300 advanced anti-aircraft missiles that Rosoboronexport has delivered to the Assad regime in Syria. 

(B) A list of the known contracts, if any, that 

Rosoboronexport has signed with the Assad regime since 

January 1, 2013. 

(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated for 

the Department of Defense to enter into a contract or other agreement with Rosoboronexport for the purpose of supplying spare parts 

for the sustained maintenance of helicopters operated by the Afghan 

National Security Forces. 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT 

REDUCTION 

Sec. 1301. Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds. 

Sec. 1302. Funding allocations. 

Sec. 1303. Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the cooperative 

threat reduction program. 

Sec. 1304. Strategy to modernize cooperative threat reduction and prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the 

Middle East and North Africa region. 

SEC. 1301. SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

PROGRAMS AND FUNDS. 

(a) SPECIFICATION OF COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION PROGRAMS.—For purposes of section 301 and other provisions of this 

Act, Cooperative Threat Reduction programs are the programs specified in section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 1997 (50 U.S.C. 2362 note). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
264 

(b) FISCAL YEAR 2014 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION FUNDS

DEFINED.—As used in this title, the term ‘‘fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds’’ means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made 

available by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative 

Threat Reduction programs. 

(c) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds appropriated pursuant to the 

authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available 

by the funding table in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2014, 

2015, and 2016. 

SEC. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS. 

(a) FUNDING FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES.—Of the $528,455,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal 

year 2014 in section 301 and made available by the funding table 

in section 4301 for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified: (1) For strategic offensive arms elimination, $5,700,000. 

(2) For chemical weapons destruction, $13,000,000. 

(3) For global nuclear security, $32,808,000. 

(4) For cooperative biological engagement, $306,325,000. 

(5) For proliferation prevention, $136,072,000. 

(6) For threat reduction engagement, $6,375,000. 

(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Adminis- trative Costs, $28,175,000. 

(b) REPORT ON OBLIGATION OR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR

OTHER PURPOSES.—No fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than 

a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) until 

15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated 

or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. 

Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing 

the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2014 Cooperative Threat 

Reduction funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title or any 

other provision of law. 

(c) LIMITED AUTHORITY TO VARY INDIVIDUAL AMOUNTS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in 

which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary 

to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate 

amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2014 for a purpose listed 

in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the 

specific amount authorized for that purpose. 

(2) NOTICE-AND-WAIT REQUIRED.—An obligation of funds for 

a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) 

in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose 

may be made using the authority provided in paragraph (1) 

only after— 

(A) the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the 

intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the 

justification for doing so; and 

(B) 15 days have elapsed following the date of the notification. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
265 

(d) ENHANCED AUTHORITY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The percentage limitation specified in subsection (a) of section 1305 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (22 U.S.C. 5965) shall not apply with 

respect to amounts appropriated or otherwise made available 

for fiscal year 2014 or 2015 for the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program of the Department of Defense to the extent that 

amounts expended in excess of such percentage limitation for either such fiscal year are expended for activities undertaken 

under that section with respect to Syria. 

(2) QUARTERLY BRIEFINGS.— (A) INITIAL BRIEFING.—Not later than April 15, 2014, the 

Secretary shall provide to the appropriate congressional 

committees a briefing on activities described in subsection 

(a) that includes the following: 

(i) A comprehensive assessment of the chemical 

weapons stockpiles in Syria, including names, types, 

and quantities of chemical weapons agents, types of 

munitions, and location and form of storage, production, and research and development facilities. 

(ii) An assessment of undeclared chemical weapons 

stockpiles, munitions, and facilities. 

(iii) A detailed plan for carrying out such activities. 

(iv) Estimated costs, timelines, and milestones for 

carrying out the plan, including accounting of funds 

expended between September 27, 2013, and the date of 

the initial briefing. 

(v) A discussion of the planned final disposition of 

equipment and facilities procured using funds authorized for such activities. 

(vi) A detailed list of pledges made and funds received by foreign nations and multilateral organizations. 

(vii) Any other issues or events that reflect the current status of the efforts to remove and destroy Syria’s 

chemical weapons. 

(B) SUBSEQUENT BRIEFINGS.—Not later than 90 days 

after providing the briefing required by subparagraph (A), 

and each 90-day period thereafter, the Secretary shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing 

on the activities carried out under subsection (a) that includes the following: 

(i) An accounting of the funds expended as of the 

date of the briefing to carry out such activities. 

(ii) An estimate of the funds that are expected to be 

expended for such activities in the 90-day period following the briefing. 

(iii) An identification of recipients of assistance pursuant to such activities. 

(iv) A description of the types of equipment and services procured in carrying out such activities. 

(v) A detailed list of pledges made and funds received by foreign nations and multilateral organizations. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
266 

(vi) Any other issues or events that reflect the current 

status of the efforts to remove and destroy Syria’s 

chemical weapons. 

(3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means the following: 

(A) The congressional defense committees. 

(B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1303. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR UTILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION 

PROGRAM. 

Section 1303(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2557; 22 U.S.C. 5952 

note) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2015’’ and inserting 

‘‘December 31, 2018’’. 

SEC. 1304. STRATEGY TO MODERNIZE COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION AND PREVENT THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS 

OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND RELATED MATERIALS IN THE 

MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA REGION. 

(a) STRATEGY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, shall 

establish a comprehensive and broad nonproliferation strategy to 

advance cooperative efforts with the governments of countries in the 

Middle East and North Africa to reduce the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall— 

(1) build upon the current activities of the nonproliferation 

programs of the Department of Defense, the Department of 

State, the Department of Energy, and other departments and 

agencies of the Federal Government designed to mitigate the 

range of threats posed by weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa region; 

(2) review issues relating to the threat from the proliferation 

of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the 

Middle East and North Africa region on a regional basis as 

well as on a country-by-country basis; 

(3) review the activities and achievements in the Middle East 

and North Africa region of— 

(A) the Cooperative Threat Reduction program of the Department of Defense; 

(B) the nonproliferation programs of the Department of 

State and the Department of Energy; and 

(C) programs of other departments and agencies of the 

Federal Government designed to address nuclear, chemical, 

and biological safety and security issues; 

(4) ensure the continued coordination of cooperative nonproliferation efforts within the Federal Government; 

(5) mobilize and leverage additional resources from countries 

that cooperate with the United States with respect to nonproliferation efforts, nongovernmental and multilateral organizations, and international institutions; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
267 

(6) include an assessment of what countries are financially, 

materially, or technologically supporting proliferation in the 

Middle East and North Africa region and how the strategy will 

prevent, stop, or interdict such support; 

(7) include an estimate of associated costs required to plan 

and execute the proposed cooperative threat reduction activities 

under the strategy; and 

(8) include a discussion of the metrics to measure the success 

of the strategy and such activities in reducing the regional 

threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. 

(c) INTEGRATION AND COORDINATION.—The strategy required by 

subsection (a) shall include— 

(1) an assessment of gaps in current cooperative efforts to reduce the threat from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North 

Africa region; 

(2) an articulation of the priorities of the United States with 

respect to reducing such threat; 

(3) the establishment of appropriate metrics for determining 

success with respect to reducing such threat; and 

(4) methods for ensuring that the strategy conforms to broader efforts by the United States to reduce the threat from weapons of mass destruction. 

(d) CONSULTATIONS.—In establishing the strategy required by 

subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with governmental and nongovernmental experts in matters relating to nonproliferation that present a diverse set of views. 

(e) SUBMISSION OF STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional 

committees the strategy required by subsection (a) and a plan 

for the implementation of the strategy. 

(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means the following: 

(A) The congressional defense committees. 

(B) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 

and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives. 

(3) FORM.—The strategy and plan required by paragraph (1) 

shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

Sec. 1401. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1402. National Defense Sealift Fund. 

Sec. 1403. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense. 

Sec. 1404. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1405. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1406. Defense Health Program. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
268 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

Sec. 1411. Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic and 

critical materials supply. 

Sec. 1412. Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense Stockpile. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois. 

Sec. 1422. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

Sec. 1423. Cemeterial expenses. 

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

SEC. 1401. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working 

capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1402. NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1403. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION, DEFENSE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal 

year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical 

Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

(b) USE.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for— 

(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in 

accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and 

(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United 

States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act. 

SEC. 1404. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1405. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department 

of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

SEC. 1406. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activiVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00300 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
269 

ties and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the 

health of eligible beneficiaries. 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

SEC. 1411. USE OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE FOR THE CONSERVATION OF A STRATEGIC AND CRITICAL MATERIALS 

SUPPLY. 

(a) PRESIDENTIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSERVATION OF STOCKPILE MATERIALS.—Section 6(a) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98e(a)) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (6) 

and (7), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): 

‘‘(5) provide for the appropriate recovery of any strategic and 

critical materials under section 3(a) that may be available from 

excess materials made available for recovery purposes by other 

Federal agencies;’’. 

(b) USES OF NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE TRANSACTION

FUND.—Section 9(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 98h(b)(2)) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (L) as subparagraphs (E) through (M), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new 

subparagraph (D): 

‘‘(D) Encouraging the appropriate conservation of strategic 

and critical materials.’’. 

(c) DEVELOPMENT OF DOMESTIC SOURCES.—Section 15(a) of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 98h–6(a)) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and appropriate conservation’’ after ‘‘development’’. 

SEC. 1412. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE 

NATIONAL DEFENSE STOCKPILE. 

(a) ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—Using funds available in the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National Defense 

Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials determined 

to be strategic and critical materials required to meet the defense, 

industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States: 

(1) Ferroniobium. 

(2) Dysprosium Metal. 

(3) Yttrium Oxide. 

(4) Cadmium Zinc Tellurium Substrate Materials. 

(5) Lithium Ion Precursors. 

(6) Triamino-Trinitrobenzene and Insensitive High Explosive 

Molding Powders. 

(b) AMOUNT OF AUTHORITY.—The National Defense Stockpile 

Manager may use up to $41,000,000 of the National Stockpile 

Transaction Fund for acquisition of the materials specified in subsection (a). 

(c) FISCAL YEAR LIMITATION.—The authority under this section is 

available for purchases during fiscal year 2014 through fiscal year 

2019. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
270 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

SEC. 1421. AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO JOINT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE–DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

MEDICAL FACILITY DEMONSTRATION FUND FOR CAPTAIN 

JAMES A. LOVELL HEALTH CARE CENTER, ILLINOIS. 

(a) AUTHORITY FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $143,087,000 

may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility 

Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection 

(a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated 

as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose 

of such a transfer. 

(b) USE OF TRANSFERRED FUNDS.—For the purposes of subsection 

(b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the 

North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 

4500). 

SEC. 1422. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ARMED FORCES 

RETIREMENT HOME. 

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 

from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of 

$67,800,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement 

Home. 

SEC. 1423. CEMETERIAL EXPENSES. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of the Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial expenses, not 

otherwise provided for, in the amount of $45,800,000. 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

Sec. 1501. Purpose. 

Sec. 1502. Procurement. 

Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 1505. Military personnel. 

Sec. 1506. Working capital funds. 

Sec. 1507. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide. 

Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General. 

Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
271 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations. 

Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority. 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters 

Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund. 

Sec. 1532. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 

Sec. 1533. Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization. 

Sec. 1534. Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional 

Appropriations 

SEC. 1501. PURPOSE. 

The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the 

Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 to provide additional 

funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the 

Armed Forces. 

SEC. 1502. PROCUREMENT. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified 

in the funding table in section 4102. 

SEC. 1503. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202. 

SEC. 1504. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302. 

SEC. 1505. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table 

in section 4402. 

SEC. 1506. WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working 

capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

SEC. 1507. DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE-WIDE. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise proVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00303 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
272 

vided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

SEC. 1508. DEFENSE INSPECTOR GENERAL. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department 

of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

SEC. 1509. DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2014 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

SEC. 1521. TREATMENT AS ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. 

The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act. 

SEC. 1522. SPECIAL TRANSFER AUTHORITY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER AUTHORIZATIONS.— 

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the 

Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 

2014 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or 

any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred. 

(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that the 

Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection 

may not exceed $4,000,000,000. 

(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—Transfers under this section shall 

be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001. 

(c) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY.—The transfer authority provided by 

this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under 

section 1001. 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other 

Matters 

SEC. 1531. AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND. 

(a) CONTINUATION OF EXISTING LIMITATIONS ON USE OF FUNDS

IN FUND.—Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2014 shall be subject 

to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 

1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 

(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) 

of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
273 

(b) REVISION OF PLAN FOR USE OF AFGHANISTAN SECURITY

FORCES FUND.— (1) REVISION AND PURPOSE.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

revise the plan required by section 1531(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 2056) regarding use of the Afghanistan Security 

Forces Fund through September 30, 2017, to ensure that an office or official of the Department of Defense is identified as responsible for each program or activity supported using funds 

available to the Department of Defense through the Afghanistan 

Security Forces Fund. 

(2) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional committees the plan as revised pursuant to 

paragraph (1). 

(c) PROMOTION OF RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF WOMEN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds available to the Department of 

Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 

2014, no less than $25,000,000 shall be available to be used for 

programs and activities to support the recruitment, integration, 

retention, training, and treatment of women in the Afghanistan 

National Security Forces (ANSF). 

(2) TYPES OF PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.—Such programs 

and activities may include, but are not limited to— 

(A) efforts to recruit women into the ANSF, including the 

special operations forces; 

(B) programs and activities of the Afghan Ministry of Defense Directorate of Human Rights and Gender Integration 

and the Afghan Ministry of Interior Office of Human 

Rights, Gender and Child Rights; 

(C) development and dissemination of gender and human 

rights educational and training materials and programs 

within the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the Afghan 

Ministry of Interior; 

(D) efforts to address harassment and violence against 

women within the ANSF; 

(E) efforts to increase female security personnel in connection with elections in Afghanistan; and 

(F) improvements to infrastructure that address the requirements of women serving in the ANSF. 

(d) EQUIPMENT DISPOSAL.— 

(1) ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT.—The Secretary of 

Defense may accept equipment procured using funds authorized 

under prior Acts that was transferred to the security forces of 

Afghanistan and returned by such forces to the United States 

if the Secretary provides written notification to the congressional defense committees of the Secretary’s intention to accept 

such equipment. 

(2) TREATMENT AS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STOCKS.—The 

equipment described in paragraph (1), and equipment not yet 

transferred to the security forces of Afghanistan that is determined by the Commander, Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (or the Commander’s designee) to no longer 

be required for transfer to such forces, may be treated as stocks 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
274 

of the Department of Defense upon notification to the congressional defense committees of such treatment. 

(3) REPORTS.— 

(A) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that details all equipment that was transferred to the 

security forces of Afghanistan and returned by such forces 

to the United States, including type of equipment and reason for its return. 

(B) SUBSEQUENT REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after 

the end of the first two fiscal year quarters of fiscal year 

2014, and not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal half-year thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the equipment 

accepted under paragraph (1) during such fiscal year quarter or half-year, as the case may be. Each report shall include, for the period covered by such report, a list of all 

equipment accepted under paragraph (1) that was treated 

as the stocks of the Department pursuant to paragraph (2). 

SEC. 1532. JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND. 

(a) USE AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in 

effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan 

Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 

(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the funds 

made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2014. 

(b) TERMINATION OF NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—Effective December 31, 2014, paragraph (4) of subsection (c) of section 1514 of 

the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as amended by 

section 1503(c) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), 

is repealed. 

(c) EXTENSION OF INTERDICTION OF IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE PRECURSOR CHEMICALS AUTHORITY.—Section 1532(c)(4) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2057) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 

2013’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

(d) SEMIANNUAL OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURE REPORTS.—Not 

later April 15 and October 15, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall 

provide to the congressional defense committees a report on the 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund explaining commitments, obligations, and expenditures by line of operation during the 

preceding six months. 

SEC. 1533. FUTURE ROLE OF JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE 

DEFEAT ORGANIZATION. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report on the future plans of 

the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
275 

Defeat Organization (JIEDDO). The Secretary shall prepare the report in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. 

(b) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection (a) 

shall include the following elements: 

(1) The operational and enduring requirements considered in 

determining the future plans for JIEDDO. 

(2) If the Secretary of Defense plans to discontinue JIEDDO— 

(A) a description of how JIEDDO’s major programs, capabilities, and lines of operations will be integrated into 

other components within the Department of Defense or discontinued; and 

(B) a statement of the estimated costs to other components of the Department for any JIEDDO program, capability, or line of operations reassigned to such components. 

(3) If the Secretary of Defense plans to continue JIEDDO— 

(A) a statement of the expected mission of JIEDDO; 

(B) a description of the expected organizational structure 

for JIEDDO, including the reporting structure and lines of 

operation within the Department and personnel strength, 

including contractors; and 

(C) a statement of the estimated costs and budgetary impacts related to implementing any changes to the mission 

of JIEDDO and its organizational structure. 

(4) A timeline for implementation of the selected alternative 

described in paragraph (2) or (3). 

(5) A description of how the Department will identify and incorporate lessons learned from establishing and managing 

JIEDDO and its programs. 

SEC. 1534. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS AND STABILITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (a) of section 1535 of the Ike Skelton 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public 

Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4426), as most recently amended by section 

1533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2058), is further amended— 

(1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and October 31, 2011, October 31, 2012, and October 31, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘October 31 

of each of 2011 through 2014’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ and 

inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’. 

(b) FUNDING.—Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4) of such subsection, as so amended, is further amended— 

(1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new clause: 

‘‘(iii) may not exceed $63,800,000 for fiscal year 

2014.’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Paragraph (4) of such subsection is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D); 

(2) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 

subparagraph (C): 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
276 

‘‘(C) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL

YEAR 2014.—None of the funds available for fiscal year 2014 

pursuant to subparagraph (B)(iii) may be obligated to assist the Government of Afghanistan in the purchase of 

equipment, supplies, or materials for mining and oil and 

gas resources during fiscal year 2014 or the installation of 

such equipment, supplies, or materials, until the date on 

which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the Government of Afghanistan has agreed 

to reimburse the Government of the United States for the 

amount of any such funds, from royalties received from 

mining or oil and gas contracts awarded by the Government of Afghanistan.’’; and 

(3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by 

inserting ‘‘OF FUNDS ACROSS FISCAL YEARS’’ after ‘‘AVAILABILITY’’. 

(d) CONVERSION OF UPDATE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSITION

ACTION PLAN FROM QUARTERLY TO BIANNUALLY.—Paragraph (7)(B) 

of such subsection, as so amended, is further amended by striking 

‘‘90 days’’ and inserting ‘‘180 days’’. 

TITLE XVI—INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS 

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

Sec. 1601. Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of Department of Defense. 

Sec. 1602. Foreign space activities. 

Sec. 1603. Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns 

Sec. 1611. Advancing small business growth. 

Sec. 1612. Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative 

Agreement Program. 

Sec. 1613. Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small business 

concerns. 

Sec. 1614. Credit for certain small business subcontractors. 

Sec. 1615. Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts. 

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base 

Matters 

SEC. 1601. PERIODIC AUDITS OF CONTRACTING COMPLIANCE BY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

(a) REQUIREMENT FOR PERIODIC AUDITS OF CONTRACTING COMPLIANCE.—The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall 

conduct periodic audits of contracting practices and policies related 

to procurement under section 2533a of title 10, United States Code. 

(b) REQUIREMENT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SEMIANNUAL

REPORTS.—The Inspector General of the Department of Defense 

shall ensure that findings and other information resulting from audits conducted pursuant to subsection (a) are included in the semiannual report transmitted to congressional committees under section 

8(f)(1) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
277 

SEC. 1602. FOREIGN SPACE ACTIVITIES. 

(a) CONTRACTS WITH CERTAIN FOREIGN ENTITIES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, 

as amended by section 911(a) of this Act, is further amended by 

adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2279. Foreign commercial satellite services 

‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract for satellite services 

with a foreign entity if the Secretary reasonably believes that— 

‘‘(1) the foreign entity is an entity in which the government of 

a covered foreign country has an ownership interest that enables that government to affect satellite operations; or 

‘‘(2) the foreign entity plans to or is expected to provide 

launch or other satellite services under the contract from a covered foreign country. 

‘‘(b) NOTICE AND EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in subsection (a) 

shall not apply to a contract if— 

‘‘(1) the Secretary determines it is in the national security of 

the United States to enter into such contract; and 

‘‘(2) not later than 7 days before entering into such contract, 

the Secretary, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, submits to the congressional defense committees a 

national security assessment for such contract that includes the 

following: 

‘‘(A) The projected period of performance (including any 

period covered by options to extend the contract), the financial terms, and a description of the services to be provided 

under the contract. 

‘‘(B) To the extent practicable, a description of the ownership interest that a covered foreign country has in the foreign entity providing satellite services to the Department of 

Defense under the contract and the launch or other satellite 

services that will be provided in a covered foreign country 

under the contract. 

‘‘(C) A justification for entering into a contract with such 

foreign entity and a description of the actions necessary to 

eliminate the need to enter into such a contract with such 

foreign entity in the future. 

‘‘(D) A risk assessment of entering into a contract with 

such foreign entity, including an assessment of mission assurance and security of information and a description of 

any measures necessary to mitigate risks found by such risk 

assessment. 

‘‘(c) DELEGATION OF NOTICE AND EXCEPTION AUTHORITY.—The 

Secretary of Defense may only delegate the authority under subsection (b) to enter into a contract subject to the prohibition under 

subsection (a) to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, or the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and such authority may not 

be further delegated. 

‘‘(d) FORM OF ASSESSMENTS.—Each assessment under subsection 

(b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
278 

‘‘(e) COVERED FOREIGN COUNTRY DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘covered foreign country’ means a country described in section 

1261(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2019).’’. 

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at 

the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 911(b) of 

this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following 

item: 

‘‘2279. Foreign commercial satellite services.’’. 

(b) LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION ON UNITED STATES TERRITORY

OF SATELLITE POSITIONING GROUND MONITORING STATIONS OF

FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS.— 

(1) CERTIFICATION.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The President may not authorize or 

permit the construction of a global navigation satellite system ground monitoring station directly or indirectly controlled by a foreign government (including a ground monitoring station owned, operated, or controlled on behalf of a 

foreign government) in the territory of the United States 

unless the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National 

Intelligence jointly certify to the appropriate congressional 

committees that such ground monitoring station will not 

possess the capability or potential to be used for the purpose of gathering intelligence in the United States or improving any foreign weapon system. 

(B) FORM.—Each certification under subparagraph (A) 

shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a 

classified annex. 

(2) NATIONAL SECURITY WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense 

and the Director of National Intelligence may jointly waive the 

certification requirement in paragraph (1) for a ground monitoring station if— 

(A) the Secretary and the Director jointly determine that 

the waiver is in the vital interests of the national security 

of the United States; and 

(B) the Secretary and the Director ensure that— 

(i) all data collected or transmitted from ground 

monitoring stations covered by the waiver are not 

encrypted; 

(ii) all persons involved in the construction, operation, and maintenance of such ground monitoring stations are United States persons; 

(iii) such ground monitoring stations are not located 

in geographic proximity to sensitive United States national security sites; 

(iv) the United States approves all equipment to be 

located at such ground monitoring stations; 

(v) appropriate actions are taken to ensure that any 

such ground monitoring stations do not pose a cyber 

espionage or other threat, including intelligence or 

counterintelligence, to the national security of the 

United States; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
279 

(vi) any improvements to such ground monitoring 

stations do not reduce or compete with the advantages 

of Global Positioning System technology for users. 

(3) WAIVER REPORT.—For each waiver under paragraph (2), 

the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall jointly 

submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report 

containing— 

(A) the reason why it is not possible to provide the certification under paragraph (1) for the ground monitoring stations covered by such waiver; 

(B) an assessment of the impact of the exercise of authority under paragraph (2) with respect to such ground monitoring stations on the national security of the United 

States; 

(C) a description of the means to be used to mitigate any 

such impact to the United States for the duration that such 

ground monitoring stations are operated in the territory of 

the United States; and 

(D) any other information in connection with the waiver 

that the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National 

Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of State, 

consider appropriate. 

(4) NOTICE.—Not later than 30 days before the exercise of the 

authority to waive under paragraph (2) the certification requirement under paragraph (1) for a ground monitoring station, the 

Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence 

shall jointly provide to the appropriate congressional committees notice of the exercise of such authority and the report required under paragraph (3) with respect to such ground monitoring station. 

(5) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In 

this subsection, the term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ 

means— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on 

Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence 

of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the committee on 

Foreign Affairs, and the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

(6) SUNSET.—Effective on the date that is five years after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, paragraphs (1) through (5) 

are repealed. 

SEC. 1603. PROOF OF CONCEPT COMMERCIALIZATION PILOT PROGRAM. 

(a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through 

the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, 

may establish and implement a pilot program, to be known as the 

‘‘Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program’’, in accordance 

with this section. 

(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the pilot program is to accelerate 

the commercialization of basic research innovations from qualifying 

institutions. 

(c) AWARDS.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
280 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Under the pilot program, the Secretary 

shall make financial awards to qualifying institutions in accordance with this subsection. 

(2) COMPETITIVE, MERIT-BASED PROCESS.—An award under 

the pilot program shall be made using a competitive, meritbased process. 

(3) ELIGIBILITY.—A qualifying institution shall be eligible for 

an award under the pilot program if the institution agrees to— 

(A) use funds from the award for the uses specified in 

paragraph (5); and 

(B) oversee the use of the funds through— 

(i) a rigorous, diverse review board comprised of experts in translational and proof of concept research, including industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, 

financial, and business experts and university technology transfer officials; 

(ii) technology validation milestones focused on market feasibility; 

(iii) simple reporting on program progress; and 

(iv) a process to reallocate funding from poor performing projects to those with more potential. 

(4) CRITERIA.—An award may be made under the pilot program to a qualifying institution in accordance with the following criteria: 

(A) The extent to which a qualifying institution— 

(i) has an established and proven technology transfer 

or commercialization office and has a plan for engaging that office in the program’s implementation or has 

outlined an innovative approach to technology transfer 

that has the potential to increase or accelerate technology transfer outcomes and can be adopted by other 

qualifying institutions; 

(ii) can assemble a project management board comprised of industry, start-up, venture capital, technical, 

financial, and business experts; 

(iii) has an intellectual property rights strategy or office; and 

(iv) demonstrates a plan for sustainability beyond 

the duration of the funding from the award. 

(B) Such other criteria as the Secretary determines necessary. 

(5) USE OF AWARD.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), the funds 

from an award may be used to evaluate the commercial potential of existing discoveries, including activities that contribute to determining a project’s commercialization path, 

including technical validations, market research, clarifying 

intellectual property rights, and investigating commercial 

and business opportunities. 

(B) LIMITATIONS.— (i) The amount of an award may not exceed $500,000 

a year. 

(ii) Funds from an award may not be used for basic 

research, or to fund the acquisition of research equipVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00312 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
281 

ment or supplies unrelated to commercialization activities. 

(d) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the establishment of 

the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees and to the Committee on Science, Space, and 

Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report evaluating the effectiveness of the activities of the pilot program. The report shall include— 

(1) a detailed description of the pilot program, including incentives and activities undertaken by review board experts; 

(2) an accounting of the funds used in the pilot program; 

(3) a detailed description of the institutional selection process; 

(4) a detailed compilation of results achieved by the pilot program; and 

(5) an analysis of the program’s effectiveness, with data supporting the analysis. 

(e) QUALIFYING INSTITUTION DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘qualifying institution’’ means a nonprofit institution, as defined in 

section 4(3) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 

1980 (15 U.S.C. 3703(3)), or a Federal laboratory, as defined in section 4(4) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 

(15 U.S.C. 3703(4)). 

(f) LIMITATION.—Not more than $5,000,000 may be obligated or 

expended to conduct the pilot program under this section. 

(g) TERMINATION.—The pilot program conducted under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2018. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small 

Business Concerns 

SEC. 1611. ADVANCING SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH. 

(a) ADVANCING SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 142 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(A) by redesignating section 2419 as section 2420; and 

(B) by inserting after section 2418 the following new section 2419: 

‘‘§ 2419. Advancing small business growth 

‘‘(a) CONTRACT CLAUSE REQUIRED.—(1) The Under Secretary of 

Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall require the 

clause described in paragraph (2) to be included in each covered 

contract awarded by the Department of Defense. 

‘‘(2) The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that— 

‘‘(A) requires the contractor to acknowledge that acceptance of 

the contract may cause the business to exceed the applicable 

small business size standards (established pursuant to section 

3(a) of the Small Business Act) for the industry concerned and 

that the contractor may no longer qualify as a small business 

concern for that industry; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
282 

‘‘(B) encourages the contractor to develop capabilities and 

characteristics typically desired in contractors that are competitive as an other-than-small business in that industry. 

‘‘(b) AVAILABILITY OF ASSISTANCE.—Covered small businesses may 

be provided assistance as part of any procurement technical assistance furnished pursuant to this chapter. 

‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘covered contract’ means a contract— 

‘‘(A) awarded to a qualified small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of the Small Business Act; 

and 

‘‘(B) with an estimated annual value— 

‘‘(i) that will exceed the applicable receipt-based 

small business size standard; or 

‘‘(ii) if the contract is in an industry with an employee-based size standard, that will exceed 

$70,000,000. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘covered small business’ means a qualified 

small business concern as defined pursuant to section 3(a) of 

the Small Business Act that has entered into a contract with 

the Department of Defense that includes a contract clause described in subsection (a)(2).’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by striking the item relating to section 2419 and inserting the following: 

‘‘2419. Advancing small business growth. 

‘‘2420. Regulations.’’. 

(b) EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION ON FUNDING.—Section 2414 of such 

title is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The value’’ and inserting 

‘‘Except as provided in subsection (c), the value’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection (c): 

‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—The value of the assistance provided in accordance with section 2419(b) of this title is not subject to the limitations 

in subsection (a).’’. 

(c) REVISIONS TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.— (1) FULL FUNDING ALLOWED FOR CERTAIN ASSISTANCE.—Section 2413(b) of such title is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘except that in the case’’ and inserting: 

‘‘except that— 

‘‘(1) in the case’’; 

(B) by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; 

and’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) in the case of a program sponsored by such an entity that 

provides assistance for covered small businesses pursuant to 

section 2419(b) of this title, the Secretary may agree to furnish 

the full cost of such assistance.’’. 

(2) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS.—Section 2413 of such title 

is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) In determining the level of funding to provide under an agreement under subsection (b), the Secretary shall consider the forecast 

by the eligible entity of demand for procurement technical assistVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00314 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
283 

ance, and, in the case of an established program under this chapter, 

the outlays and receipts of such program during prior years of operation.’’. 

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2413(d) of such title 

is amended by striking ‘‘and in determining the level of funding 

to provide under an agreement under subsection (b),’’. 

(d) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 15, of 2015, 2016, 

and 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional 

defense committees a report on the implementation of the amendments made by this section, along with any recommendations for 

improving the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program. 

SEC. 1612. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PROCUREMENT TECHNICAL 

ASSISTANCE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM. 

(a) INCREASE IN GOVERNMENT SHARE.—Section 2413(b) of title 

10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘one-half’’ both places it appears and inserting 

‘‘65 percent’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘three-fourths’’ and inserting ‘‘75 percent’’. 

(b) INCREASE IN LIMITATIONS ON VALUE OF ASSISTANCE.—Section 

2414(a) of such title is amended— 

(1) in paragraphs (1) and (4), by striking ‘‘$600,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$750,000’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘$300,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$450,000’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘$150,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$300,000’’. 

SEC. 1613. REPORTING ON GOALS FOR PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS 

AWARDED TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

Subsection (h)(1) of section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 644) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (B); 

(2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) and 

inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) a remediation plan with proposed new practices to 

better meet such goals, including analysis of factors leading 

to any failure to achieve such goals.’’. 

SEC. 1614. CREDIT FOR CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTORS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 

U.S.C. 637(d)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (6)(D), by adding before the semicolon at the 

end the following: ‘‘, and assurances at a minimum that the offeror or bidder, and all subcontractors required to maintain 

subcontracting plans pursuant to this paragraph, will— 

‘‘(i) review and approve subcontracting plans submitted 

by their subcontractors; 

‘‘(ii) monitor subcontractor compliance with their approved subcontracting plans; 

‘‘(iii) ensure that subcontracting reports are submitted by 

their subcontractors when required; 

‘‘(iv) acknowledge receipt of their subcontractors’ reports; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
284 

‘‘(v) compare the performance of their subcontractors to 

subcontracting plans and goals; and 

‘‘(vi) discuss performance with subcontractors when necessary to ensure their subcontractors make a good faith effort to comply with their subcontracting plans’’; 

(2) in paragraph (6)(F), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(3) by redesignating subparagraph (G) of paragraph (6) as 

subparagraph (H), and inserting after subparagraph (F) of 

paragraph (6) the following new subparagraph (G): 

‘‘(G) a recitation of the types of records the successful offeror 

or bidder will maintain to demonstrate procedures which have 

been adopted to ensure subcontractors at all tiers comply with 

the requirements and goals set forth in the plan established in 

accordance with subparagraph (D) of this paragraph, including— 

‘‘(i) the establishment of source lists of small business 

concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by 

veterans, small business concerns owned and controlled by 

service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns owned and controlled by 

women; and 

‘‘(ii) efforts to identify and award subcontracts to such 

small business concerns; and’’; 

(4) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(16) CREDIT FOR CERTAIN SUBCONTRACTORS.— ‘‘(A) For purposes of determining whether or not a prime contractor has attained the percentage goals specified in paragraph 

(6)— 

‘‘(i) if the subcontracting goals pertain only to a single 

contract with the executive agency, the prime contractor 

shall receive credit for small business concerns performing 

as first tier subcontractors or subcontractors at any tier 

pursuant to the subcontracting plans required under paragraph (6)(D) in an amount equal to the dollar value of 

work awarded to such small business concerns; and 

‘‘(ii) if the subcontracting goals pertain to more than one 

contract with one or more executive agencies, or to one contract with more than one executive agency, the prime contractor may only count first tier subcontractors that are 

small business concerns. 

‘‘(B) Nothing in this paragraph shall abrogate the responsibility of a prime contractor to make a good-faith effort to 

achieve the first tier small business subcontracting goals negotiated under paragraph (6)(A), or the requirement for subcontractors with further opportunities for subcontracting to 

make a good-faith effort to achieve the goals established under 

paragraph (6)(D).’’. 

(b) DEFINITIONS PERTAINING TO SUBCONTRACTING.—Section 3 of 

the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632) is amended by adding at 

the end the following: 

‘‘(dd) DEFINITIONS PERTAINING TO SUBCONTRACTING.—In this 

Act: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
285 

‘‘(1) SUBCONTRACT.—The term ‘subcontract’ means a legally 

binding agreement between a contractor that is already under 

contract to another party to perform work, and a third party, 

hereinafter referred to as the subcontractor, for the subcontractor to perform a part, or all, of the work that the contractor 

has undertaken. 

‘‘(2) FIRST TIER SUBCONTRACTOR.—The term ‘first tier subcontractor’ means a subcontractor who has a subcontract directly 

with the prime contractor. 

‘‘(3) AT ANY TIER.—The term ‘at any tier’ means any subcontractor other than a subcontractor who is a first tier subcontractor.’’. 

(c) IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

(1) REQUIREMENT FOR PLAN.—Not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the 

Small Business Administration, the Secretary of Defense, and 

the Administrator of General Services shall submit to the Committee on Small Business and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

Small Business and Entrepreneurship and the Committee on 

Armed Services of the Senate a plan to implement this section 

and the amendments made by this section. The plan shall contain assurances that the appropriate tracking mechanisms are 

in place to enable transparency of subcontracting activities at 

all tiers. 

(2) COMPLETION OF PLAN ACTIONS.—Not later than one year 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

the Small Business Administration, the Secretary of Defense, 

and the Administrator of General Services shall complete the 

actions required by the plan. 

(3) REGULATIONS.—No later than 18 months after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall promulgate any regulations necessary, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be revised, 

to implement this section and the amendments made by this 

section. 

(4) APPLICABILITY.—Any regulations promulgated pursuant to 

paragraph (3) shall apply to contracts entered into after the last 

day of the fiscal year in which the regulations are promulgated. 

SEC. 1615. INAPPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENT TO REVIEW AND JUSTIFY CERTAIN CONTRACTS. 

In the case of a contract to which the provisions of section 46 of 

the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657s) apply, the requirements 

under section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1824; 10 U.S.C. 2304 

note) do not apply. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
286 

TITLE XVII—SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND RELATED 

REFORMS 

Subtitle A—Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice 

Sec. 1701. Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 1702. Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

Sec. 1703. Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial 

for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes. 

Sec. 1704. Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense in 

presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

Sec. 1705. Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of such 

offenses by general courts-martial. 

Sec. 1706. Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial process. 

Sec. 1707. Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice. 

Sec. 1708. Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor relating to 

character and military service of the accused in rule on initial disposition of offenses. 

Sec. 1709. Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed Forces for reporting a criminal offense. 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code 

Sec. 1711. Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who have been 

convicted of certain sexual offenses. 

Sec. 1712. Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of request for permanent change of station or unit transfer by victim of sexual assault. 

Sec. 1713. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of the 

Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense. 

Sec. 1714. Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions. 

Sec. 1715. Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding 

sexual assault. 

Sec. 1716. Designation and availability of Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of 

sex-related offenses. 

Subtitle C—Amendments to Other Laws 

Sec. 1721. Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing and responding to 

sexual assaults. 

Sec. 1722. Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent panel on assessment of military response systems to sexual assault. 

Sec. 1723. Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports and Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of the Armed 

Forces. 

Sec. 1724. Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by members of 

the National Guard and Reserves. 

Sec. 1725. Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response personnel and required availability of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners. 

Sec. 1726. Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 

Office for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response 

program. 

Subtitle D—Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Sec. 1731. Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
287 

Sec. 1732. Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative practices in response to allegations of Uniform Code of Military Justice violations. 

Sec. 1733. Review of training and education provided members of the Armed Forces 

on sexual assault prevention and response. 

Sec. 1734. Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1735. Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity 

role in sexual harassment cases. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 1741. Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of the 

Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training. 

Sec. 1742. Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses involving members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1743. Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the Armed 

Forces. 

Sec. 1744. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses for 

trial by court-martial. 

Sec. 1745. Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related offenses in 

personnel service records of members of the Armed Forces. 

Sec. 1746. Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies. 

Sec. 1747. Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces are completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security 

Positions. 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions 

Sec. 1751. Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for command climate free of retaliation. 

Sec. 1752. Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice through 

courts-martial. 

Sec. 1753. Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of members 

of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related offenses. 

Subtitle A—Reform of Uniform Code of 

Military Justice 

SEC. 1701. EXTENSION OF CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS TO VICTIMS OF OFFENSES UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) VICTIMS’ RIGHTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 47 of title 10, 

United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is 

amended by adding at the end the following new section (article): 

‘‘§ 806b. Art. 6b. Rights of the victim of an offense under this 

chapter 

‘‘(a) RIGHTS OF A VICTIM OF AN OFFENSE UNDER THIS CHAPTER.—A victim of an offense under this chapter has the following 

rights: 

‘‘(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. 

‘‘(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of 

any of the following: 

‘‘(A) A public hearing concerning the continuation of confinement prior to trial of the accused. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
288 

‘‘(B) A preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title 

(article 32) relating to the offense. 

‘‘(C) A court-martial relating to the offense. 

‘‘(D) A public proceeding of the service clemency and parole board relating to the offense. 

‘‘(E) The release or escape of the accused, unless such notice may endanger the safety of any person. 

‘‘(3) The right not to be excluded from any public hearing or 

proceeding described in paragraph (2) unless the military judge 

or investigating officer, as applicable, after receiving clear and 

convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim of 

an offense under this chapter would be materially altered if the 

victim heard other testimony at that hearing or proceeding. 

‘‘(4) The right to be reasonably heard at any of the following: 

‘‘(A) A public hearing concerning the continuation of confinement prior to trial of the accused. 

‘‘(B) A sentencing hearing relating to the offense. 

‘‘(C) A public proceeding of the service clemency and parole board relating to the offense. 

‘‘(5) The reasonable right to confer with the counsel representing the Government at any proceeding described in paragraph (2). 

‘‘(6) The right to receive restitution as provided in law. 

‘‘(7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay. 

‘‘(8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for 

the dignity and privacy of the victim of an offense under this 

chapter. 

‘‘(b) VICTIM OF AN OFFENSE UNDER THIS CHAPTER DEFINED.—In 

this section, the term ‘victim of an offense under this chapter’ means 

a person who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary 

harm as a result of the commission of an offense under this chapter 

(the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

‘‘(c) LEGAL GUARDIAN FOR CERTAIN VICTIMS.—In the case of a victim of an offense under this chapter who is under 18 years of age, 

incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the military judge shall 

designate a legal guardian from among the representatives of the estate of the victim, a family member, or other suitable person to assume the victim’s rights under this section. However, in no event 

may the person so designated be the accused. 

‘‘(d) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section (article) 

shall be construed— 

‘‘(1) to authorize a cause of action for damages; or 

‘‘(2) to create, to enlarge, or to imply any duty or obligation 

to any victim of an offense under this chapter or other person 

for the breach of which the United States or any of its officers 

or employees could be held liable in damages.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at the end the 

following new item: 

‘‘806b. Art. 6b. Rights of the victim of an offense under this chapter.’’. 

(b) IMPLEMENTATION.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
289 

(1) ISSUANCE.—Not later than one year after the date of the 

enactment of this Act— 

(A) the Secretary of Defense shall recommend to the 

President changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial to implement section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 

6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by 

subsection (a); and 

(B) the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland 

Security (with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy) shall prescribe such regulations as each such Secretary considers appropriate to implement such section. 

(2) MECHANISMS FOR AFFORDING RIGHTS.—The recommendations and regulations required by paragraph (1) shall include 

the following: 

(A) Mechanisms for ensuring that victims are notified of, 

and accorded, the rights specified in section 806b of title 

10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice), as added by subsection (a). 

(B) Mechanisms for ensuring that members of the Armed 

Forces and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense 

and the Coast Guard make their best efforts to ensure that 

victims are notified of, and accorded, the rights specified in 

such section. 

(C) Mechanisms for the enforcement of such rights, including mechanisms for application for such rights and for 

consideration and disposition of applications for such 

rights. 

(D) The designation of an authority within each Armed 

Force to receive and investigate complaints relating to the 

provision or violation of such rights. 

(E) Disciplinary sanctions for members of the Armed 

Forces and other personnel of the Department of Defense 

and Coast Guard who willfully or wantonly fail to comply 

with requirements relating to such rights. 

SEC. 1702. REVISION OF ARTICLE 32 AND ARTICLE 60, UNIFORM CODE 

OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) USE OF PRELIMINARY HEARINGS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 832 of title 10, United States Code 

(article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended 

to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 832. Art. 32. Preliminary hearing 

‘‘(a) PRELIMINARY HEARING REQUIRED.—(1) No charge or specification may be referred to a general court-martial for trial until 

completion of a preliminary hearing. 

‘‘(2) The purpose of the preliminary hearing shall be limited to the 

following: 

‘‘(A) Determining whether there is probable cause to believe 

an offense has been committed and the accused committed the 

offense. 

‘‘(B) Determining whether the convening authority has courtmartial jurisdiction over the offense and the accused. 

‘‘(C) Considering the form of charges. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
290 

‘‘(D) Recommending the disposition that should be made of 

the case. 

‘‘(b) HEARING OFFICER.—(1) A preliminary hearing under subsection (a) shall be conducted by an impartial judge advocate certified under section 827(b) of this title (article 27(b)) whenever practicable or, in exceptional circumstances in which the interests of justice warrant, by an impartial hearing officer who is not a judge advocate. If the hearing officer is not a judge advocate, a judge advocate certified under section 827(b) of this title (article 27(b)) shall 

be available to provide legal advice to the hearing officer. 

‘‘(2) Whenever practicable, when the judge advocate or other hearing officer is detailed to conduct the preliminary hearing, the officer 

shall be equal to or senior in grade to military counsel detailed to 

represent the accused or the Government at the preliminary hearing. 

‘‘(c) REPORT OF RESULTS.—After conducting a preliminary hearing under subsection (a), the judge advocate or other officer conducting the preliminary hearing shall prepare a report that addresses the matters specified in subsections (a)(2) and (f). 

‘‘(d) RIGHTS OF ACCUSED AND VICTIM.—(1) The accused shall be 

advised of the charges against the accused and of the accused’s 

right to be represented by counsel at the preliminary hearing under 

subsection (a). The accused has the right to be represented at the 

preliminary hearing as provided in section 838 of this title (article 

38) and in regulations prescribed under that section. 

‘‘(2) The accused may cross-examine witnesses who testify at the 

preliminary hearing and present additional evidence in defense and 

mitigation, relevant to the limited purposes of the hearing, as provided for in paragraph (4) and subsection (a)(2). 

‘‘(3) A victim may not be required to testify at the preliminary 

hearing. A victim who declines to testify shall be deemed to be not 

available for purposes of the preliminary hearing. 

‘‘(4) The presentation of evidence and examination (including 

cross-examination) of witnesses at a preliminary hearing shall be 

limited to the matters relevant to the limited purposes of the hearing, as provided in subsection (a)(2). 

‘‘(e) RECORDING OF PRELIMINARY HEARING.—A preliminary hearing under subsection (a) shall be recorded by a suitable recording 

device. The victim may request the recording and shall have access 

to the recording as prescribed by the Manual for Courts-Martial. 

‘‘(f) EFFECT OF EVIDENCE OF UNCHARGED OFFENSE.—If evidence 

adduced in a preliminary hearing under subsection (a) indicates 

that the accused committed an uncharged offense, the hearing officer may consider the subject matter of that offense without the accused having first been charged with the offense if the accused— 

‘‘(1) is present at the preliminary hearing; 

‘‘(2) is informed of the nature of each uncharged offense considered; and 

‘‘(3) is afforded the opportunities for representation, cross-examination, and presentation consistent with subsection (d). 

‘‘(g) EFFECT OF VIOLATION.—The requirements of this section are 

binding on all persons administering this chapter, but failure to follow the requirements does not constitute jurisdictional error. 

‘‘(h) VICTIM DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘victim’ means a 

person who— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
291 

‘‘(1) is alleged to have suffered a direct physical, emotional, 

or pecuniary harm as a result of the matters set forth in a 

charge or specification being considered; and 

‘‘(2) is named in one of the specifications.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VI of chapter 47 of such title is amended 

by striking the item relating to section 832 and inserting the 

following new item: 

‘‘832. Art 32. Preliminary hearing.’’. 

(b) ELIMINATION OF UNLIMITED COMMAND PREROGATIVE AND DISCRETION; IMPOSITION OF ADDITIONAL LIMITATIONS.—Subsection (c) 

of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(c)(1) Under regulations of the Secretary concerned, a commissioned officer commanding for the time being, a successor in command, or any person exercising general court-martial jurisdiction 

may act under this section in place of the convening authority. 

‘‘(2)(A) Action on the sentence of a court-martial shall be taken by 

the convening authority or by another person authorized to act 

under this section. Subject to regulations of the Secretary concerned, 

such action may be taken only after consideration of any matters 

submitted by the accused under subsection (b) or after the time for 

submitting such matters expires, whichever is earlier. 

‘‘(B) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the convening authority 

or another person authorized to act under this section may approve, 

disapprove, commute, or suspend the sentence of the court-martial 

in whole or in part. 

‘‘(C) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act 

under this section acts to disapprove, commute, or suspend, in 

whole or in part, the sentence of the court-martial for an offense 

(other than a qualifying offense), the convening authority or other 

person shall provide, at that same time, a written explanation of the 

reasons for such action. The written explanation shall be made a 

part of the record of the trial and action thereon. 

‘‘(3)(A) Action on the findings of a court-martial by the convening 

authority or by another person authorized to act under this section 

is not required. 

‘‘(B) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act 

under this section acts on the findings of a court-martial, the convening authority or other person— 

‘‘(i) may not dismiss any charge or specification, other than 

a charge or specification for a qualifying offense, by setting 

aside a finding of guilty thereto; or 

‘‘(ii) may not change a finding of guilty to a charge or specification, other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense, to a finding of guilty to an offense that is a lesser included offense of the offense stated in the charge or specification. 

‘‘(C) If the convening authority or another person authorized to act 

under this section acts on the findings to dismiss or change any 

charge or specification for an offense (other than a qualifying offense), the convening authority or other person shall provide, at that 

same time, a written explanation of the reasons for such action. The 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
292 

written explanation shall be made a part of the record of the trial 

and action thereon. 

‘‘(D)(i) In this subsection, the term ‘qualifying offense’ means, except in the case of an offense excluded pursuant to clause (ii), an 

offense under this chapter for which— 

‘‘(I) the maximum sentence of confinement that may be adjudged does not exceed two years; and 

‘‘(II) the sentence adjudged does not include dismissal, a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for more 

than six months. 

‘‘(ii) Such term does not include any of the following: 

‘‘(I) An offense under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of 

this title (article 120). 

‘‘(II) An offense under section 920b or 925 of this title (articles 

120b and 125). 

‘‘(III) Such other offenses as the Secretary of Defense may 

specify by regulation. 

‘‘(4)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B) or (C), the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section may not disapprove, commute, or suspend in whole or in part 

an adjudged sentence of confinement for more than six months or 

a sentence of dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad conduct discharge. 

‘‘(B) Upon the recommendation of the trial counsel, in recognition 

of the substantial assistance by the accused in the investigation or 

prosecution of another person who has committed an offense, the 

convening authority or another person authorized to act under this 

section shall have the authority to disapprove, commute, or suspend 

the adjudged sentence in whole or in part, even with respect to an 

offense for which a mandatory minimum sentence exists. 

‘‘(C) If a pre-trial agreement has been entered into by the convening authority and the accused, as authorized by Rule for Courts– 

Martial 705, the convening authority or another person authorized 

to act under this section shall have the authority to approve, disapprove, commute, or suspend a sentence in whole or in part pursuant to the terms of the pre-trial agreement, subject to the following 

limitations for convictions of offenses that involve a mandatory minimum sentence: 

‘‘(i) If a mandatory minimum sentence of a dishonorable discharge applies to an offense for which the accused has been convicted, the convening authority or another person authorized to 

act under this section may commute the dishonorable discharge 

to a bad conduct discharge pursuant to the terms of the pretrial agreement. 

‘‘(ii) Except as provided in clause (i), if a mandatory minimum sentence applies to an offense for which the accused has 

been convicted, the convening authority or another person authorized to act under this section may not disapprove, otherwise 

commute, or suspend the mandatory minimum sentence in 

whole or in part, unless authorized to do so under subparagraph (B).’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— (1) REFERENCES TO SOLE DISCRETION AND OTHER PERSONS

AUTHORIZED TO ACT UNDER ARTICLE 60.—Section 860 of title 10, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
293 

United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice), is further amended— 

(A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘or other person taking action under this section’’ and inserting ‘‘or another 

person authorized to act under this section’’; 

(B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘or other person taking 

action under this section’’ the first place it appears and inserting ‘‘or another person authorized to act under this section’’; 

(C) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘or other person taking action under this section, in his sole discretion,’’ and inserting ‘‘or another person authorized to act under this section’’; and 

(D) in subsection (e)(3), by striking ‘‘or other person taking action under this section’’ and inserting ‘‘or another 

person authorized to act under this section’’. 

(2) OTHER AUTHORITY FOR CONVENING AUTHORITY TO SUS- PEND SENTENCE.—Section 871(d) of such title (article 71(d) of 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by adding at 

the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Paragraphs (2) and (4) of 

subsection (c) of section 860 of this title (article 60) shall apply 

to any decision by the convening authority or another person 

authorized to act under this section to suspend the execution of 

any sentence or part thereof under this subsection.’’. 

(3) REFERENCES TO ARTICLE 32 INVESTIGATION.—(A) Section 

802(d)(1)(A) of such title (article 2(d)(1)(A) of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice) is amended by striking ‘‘investigation under 

section 832’’ and inserting ‘‘a preliminary hearing under section 

832’’. 

(B) Section 834(a)(2) of such title (article 34(a)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking ‘‘investigation under section 832 of this title (article 32) (if there is 

such a report)’’ and inserting ‘‘a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32)’’. 

(C) Section 838(b)(1) of such title (article 38(b)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking ‘‘an investigation under section 832’’ and inserting ‘‘a preliminary 

hearing under section 832’’. 

(D) Section 847(a)(1) of such title (article 47(a)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by striking ‘‘an investigation pursuant to section 832(b) of this title (article 32(b))’’ 

and inserting ‘‘a preliminary hearing pursuant to section 832 of 

this title (article 32)’’. 

(E) Section 948b(d)(1)(C) of such title is amended by striking 

‘‘pretrial investigation’’ and inserting ‘‘preliminary hearing’’. 

(d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

(1) ARTICLE 32 AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by 

subsections (a) and (c)(3) shall take effect one year after the date 

of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to offenses committed under chapter 47 of title 10, United States 

Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), on or after that effective date. 

(2) ARTICLE 60 AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by 

subsection (b) and paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (c) shall 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
294 

take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act 

and shall apply with respect to offenses committed under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), on or after that effective date. 

SEC. 1703. ELIMINATION OF FIVE-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON 

TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL FOR ADDITIONAL OFFENSES 

INVOLVING SEX-RELATED CRIMES. 

(a) INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL OFFENSES.—Section 843(a) of title 

10, United States Code (article 43(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking ‘‘rape, or rape of a child’’ and 

inserting ‘‘rape or sexual assault, or rape or sexual assault of a 

child’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 843(b)(2)(B)(i) of title 10, 

United States Code (article 43(b)(2)(B)(i) of the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice), is amended by inserting before the period at the 

end the following: ‘‘, unless the offense is covered by subsection (a)’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall 

take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply 

with respect to an offense covered by section 920(b) or 920b(b) of 

title 10, United States Code (article 120(b) or 120b(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), that is committed on or after that 

date. 

SEC. 1704. DEFENSE COUNSEL INTERVIEW OF VICTIM OF AN ALLEGED 

SEX-RELATED OFFENSE IN PRESENCE OF TRIAL COUNSEL, 

COUNSEL FOR THE VICTIM, OR A SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE. 

Section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a) OPPORTUNITY TO OBTAIN WITNESSES

AND OTHER EVIDENCE.—’’before ‘‘The trial counsel’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘Process issued’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(c) PROCESS.—Process issued’’; and 

(3) by inserting after subsection (a), as designated by paragraph (1), the following new subsection (b): 

‘‘(b) DEFENSE COUNSEL INTERVIEW OF VICTIM OF ALLEGED SEXRELATED OFFENSE.—(1) Upon notice by trial counsel to defense 

counsel of the name of an alleged victim of an alleged sex-related 

offense who trial counsel intends to call to testify at a preliminary 

hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a court-martial 

under this chapter, defense counsel shall make any request to interview the victim through trial counsel. 

‘‘(2) If requested by an alleged victim of an alleged sex-related offense who is subject to a request for interview under paragraph (1), 

any interview of the victim by defense counsel shall take place only 

in the presence of trial counsel, a counsel for the victim, or a Sexual 

Assault Victim Advocate. 

‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘alleged sex-related offense’ means 

any allegation of— 

‘‘(A) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of 

this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125); or 

‘‘(B) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph 

(1) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80).’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
295 

SEC. 1705. DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL FOR CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES AND TRIAL OF SUCH OFFENSES BY GENERAL 

COURTS-MARTIAL. 

(a) MANDATORY DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL REQUIRED.— 

(1) IMPOSITION.—Section 856 of title 10, United States Code 

(article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘The punishment’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(b)(1) While a person subject to this chapter who is found guilty 

of an offense specified in paragraph (2) shall be punished as a general court-martial may direct, such punishment must include, at a 

minimum, dismissal or dishonorable discharge, except as provided 

for in section 860 of this title (article 60). 

‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies to the following offenses: 

‘‘(A) An offense in violation of subsection (a) or (b) of section 

920 of this title (article 120(a) or (b)). 

‘‘(B) Rape and sexual assault of a child under subsection (a) 

or (b) of section 920b of this title (article 120b). 

‘‘(C) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of this title (article 

125). 

‘‘(D) An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) that is punishable under section 880 of 

this title (article 80).’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.— 

(A) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 856. Art. 56. Maximum and minimum limits’’. 

(B) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of such title is 

amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and 

inserting the following new item: 

‘‘856. Art 56. Maximum and minimum limits.’’. 

(b) JURISDICTION LIMITED TO GENERAL COURTS-MARTIAL.—Section 818 of title 10, United States Code (article 18 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), is amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before the first sentence; 

(2) in the third sentence, by striking ‘‘However, a general 

court-martial’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(b) A general court-martial’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) Consistent with sections 819, 820, and 856(b) of this title (articles 19, 20, and 56(b)), only general courts-martial have jurisdiction over an offense specified in section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 

56(b)(2)).’’. 

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall 

take effect 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and 

apply to offenses specified in section 856(b)(2) of title 10, United 

States Code (article 56(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a)(1), committed on or after that date. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
296 

SEC. 1706. PARTICIPATION BY VICTIM IN CLEMENCY PHASE OF 

COURTS-MARTIAL PROCESS. 

(a) VICTIM SUBMISSION OF MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION BY CONVENING AUTHORITY.—Section 860 of title 10, United States Code 

(article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by 

section 1702, is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) 

and (f), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d)(1) In any case in which findings and sentence have been adjudged for an offense that involved a victim, the victim shall be provided an opportunity to submit matters for consideration by the convening authority or by another person authorized to act under this 

section before the convening authority or such other person takes action under this section. 

‘‘(2)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the submission of 

matters under paragraph (1) shall be made within 10 days after the 

later of— 

‘‘(i) the date on which the victim has been given an authenticated record of trial in accordance with section 854(e) of this 

title (article 54(e)); and 

‘‘(ii) if applicable, the date on which the victim has been given 

the recommendation of the staff judge advocate or legal officer 

under subsection (e). 

‘‘(B) In the case of a summary court-martial, the submission of 

matters under paragraph (1) shall be made within seven days after 

the date on which the sentence is announced. 

‘‘(3) If a victim shows that additional time is required for submission of matters under paragraph (1), the convening authority or 

other person taking action under this section, for good cause, may 

extend the submission period under paragraph (2) for not more than 

an additional 20 days. 

‘‘(4) A victim may waive the right under this subsection to make 

a submission to the convening authority or other person taking action under this section. Such a waiver shall be made in writing and 

may not be revoked. For the purposes of subsection (c)(2), the time 

within which a victim may make a submission under this subsection shall be deemed to have expired upon the submission of such 

waiver to the convening authority or such other person. 

‘‘(5) In this section, the term ‘victim’ means a person who has suffered a direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary loss as a result of 

a commission of an offense under this chapter (the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice) and on which the convening authority or other 

person authorized to take action under this section is taking action 

under this section.’’. 

(b) LIMITATIONS ON CONSIDERATION OF VICTIM’S CHARACTER.— 

Subsection (b) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 

60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding 

at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(5) The convening authority or other person taking action under 

this section shall not consider under this section any submitted matters that relate to the character of a victim unless such matters were 

presented as evidence at trial and not excluded at trial.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
297 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 860 of 

title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (d)’’ and inserting 

‘‘subsection (e)’’. 

SEC. 1707. REPEAL OF THE OFFENSE OF CONSENSUAL SODOMY UNDER 

THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

(a) RESTATEMENT OF ARTICLE 125 WITH CONSENSUAL SODOMY

OMITTED.—Section 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 125 

of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 925. Art 125. Forcible sodomy; bestiality 

‘‘(a) FORCIBLE SODOMY.—Any person subject to this chapter who 

engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the 

same or opposite sex by force or without the consent of the other person is guilty of forcible sodomy and shall be punished as a courtmartial may direct. 

‘‘(b) BESTIALITY.—Any person subject to this chapter who engages 

in unnatural carnal copulation with an animal is guilty of bestiality and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. 

‘‘(c) SCOPE OF OFFENSES.—Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete an offense under subsection (a) or (b).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking the item 

relating to section 925 (article 125) and inserting the following new 

item: 

‘‘925. Art 125. Forcible sodomy; bestiality.’’. 

SEC. 1708. MODIFICATION OF MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL TO 

ELIMINATE FACTOR RELATING TO CHARACTER AND MILITARY SERVICE OF THE ACCUSED IN RULE ON INITIAL DISPOSITION OF OFFENSES. 

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the discussion pertaining to Rule 306 of the Manual for CourtsMartial (relating to policy on initial disposition of offenses) shall be 

amended to strike the character and military service of the accused 

from the matters a commander should consider in deciding how to 

dispose of an offense. 

SEC. 1709. PROHIBITION OF RETALIATION AGAINST MEMBERS OF THE 

ARMED FORCES FOR REPORTING A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. 

(a) REGULATIONS ON PROHIBITION OF RETALIATION.— 

(1) REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

prescribe regulations, or require the Secretaries of the military 

departments to prescribe regulations, that prohibit retaliation 

against an alleged victim or other member of the Armed Forces 

who reports a criminal offense. The regulations shall prescribe 

that a violation of the regulations is an offense punishable 

under section 892 of title 10, United States Code (article 92 of 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(2) DEADLINE.—The regulations required by this subsection 

shall be prescribed not later than 120 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act. 

(b) RETALIATION AND PERSONNEL ACTION DESCRIBED.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
298 

(1) RETALIATION.—For purposes of the regulations required 

by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall define retaliation to include, at a minimum— 

(A) taking or threatening to take an adverse personnel action, or withholding or threatening to withhold a favorable 

personnel action, with respect to a member of the Armed 

Forces because the member reported a criminal offense; and 

(B) ostracism and such of acts of maltreatment, as designated by the Secretary of Defense, committed by peers of 

a member of the Armed Forces or by other persons because 

the member reported a criminal offense. 

(2) PERSONNEL ACTIONS.—For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), 

the Secretary of Defense shall define the personnel actions to be 

covered by the regulations. 

(c) REPORT ON SEPARATE PUNITIVE ARTICLE.—Not later than 180 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the recommendations of the Secretary regarding whether chapter 47 of title 

10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), 

should be amended to add a new punitive article to subchapter X 

of such chapter to prohibit retaliation against an alleged victim or 

other member of the Armed Forces who reports a criminal offense. 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, 

United States Code 

SEC. 1711. PROHIBITION ON SERVICE IN THE ARMED FORCES BY INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF CERTAIN SEXUAL OFFENSES. 

(a) PROHIBITION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 37 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 657. Prohibition on service in the armed forces by individuals convicted of certain sexual offenses 

‘‘(a) PROHIBITION ON COMMISSIONING OR ENLISTMENT.—A person 

who has been convicted of an offense specified in subsection (b) 

under Federal or State law may not be processed for commissioning 

or permitted to enlist in the armed forces. 

‘‘(b) COVERED OFFENSES.—An offense specified in this subsection 

is any felony offense as follows: 

‘‘(1) Rape or sexual assault. 

‘‘(2) Forcible sodomy. 

‘‘(3) Incest. 

‘‘(4) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 

(1) through (3), as punishable under applicable Federal or State 

law.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 37 of such title is amended by adding at the 

end the following new item: 

‘‘657. Prohibition on service in the armed forces by individuals convicted of certain 

sexual offenses.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
299 

(b) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROHIBITION.—Section 523 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 

112–239; 126 Stat. 1723; 10 U.S.C. 504 note) is repealed. 

SEC. 1712. ISSUANCE OF REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE COAST 

GUARD REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR 

PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION OR UNIT TRANSFER BY 

VICTIM OF SEXUAL ASSAULT. 

Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘The Secretaries of the military departments’’ and inserting 

‘‘The Secretary concerned’’. 

SEC. 1713. TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATIVE REASSIGNMENT OR REMOVAL OF A MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES ON ACTIVE 

DUTY WHO IS ACCUSED OF COMMITTING A SEXUAL ASSAULT OR RELATED OFFENSE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 39 of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended by inserting after section 673 the following new section: 

‘‘§ 674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of 

a member on active duty accused of committing a 

sexual assault or related offense 

‘‘(a) GUIDANCE FOR TIMELY CONSIDERATION AND ACTION.—The 

Secretary concerned may provide guidance, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense, for commanders regarding their 

authority to make a timely determination, and to take action, regarding whether a member of the armed forces serving on active 

duty who is alleged to have committed an offense under section 920, 

920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, 

or 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or an attempt to 

commit such an offense as punishable under section 880 of this title 

(article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) should be temporarily reassigned or removed from a position of authority or from 

an assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely for the purpose 

of maintaining good order and discipline within the member’s unit. 

‘‘(b) TIME FOR DETERMINATION.—A determination described in 

subsection (a) may be made at any time afer receipt of notification 

of an unrestricted report of a sexual assault or other sex-related offense that identifies the member as an alleged perpetrator.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning 

of chapter 39 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 673 the following new item: 

‘‘674. Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member on active duty 

accused of committing a sexual assault or related offense.’’. 

(c) ADDITIONAL TRAINING REQUIREMENT FOR COMMANDERS.—The 

Secretary of Defense shall provide for the inclusion of information 

and discussion regarding the availability and use of the authority 

described by section 674 of title 10, United States Code, as added 

by subsection (a), as part of the training for new and prospective 

commanders at all levels of command required by section 585(b) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
300 

SEC. 1714. EXPANSION AND ENHANCEMENT OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS OF MEMBERS OF 

THE ARMED FORCES AND PROHIBITED RETALIATORY ACTIONS. 

(a) EXPANSION OF PROHIBITED RETALIATORY PERSONNEL AC- TIONS.—Subsection (b) of section 1034 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘preparing—’’ and inserting ‘‘preparing or 

being perceived as making or preparing—’’; 

(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(C) in subparagraph (B)— 

(i) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(ii) by redesignating clause (v) as clause (vi) and, in 

such clause, by striking the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(iii) by inserting after clause (iv) the following new 

clause (v): 

‘‘(v) a court-martial proceeding; or’’; and 

(D) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(C) testimony, or otherwise participating in or assisting in 

an investigation or proceeding related to a communication 

under subparagraph (A) or (B), or filing, causing to be filed, 

participating in, or otherwise assisting in an action brought 

under this section.’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘unfavorable action’’ and inserting a comma; and 

(B) by inserting after ‘‘any favorable action’’ the following: ‘‘, or making or threatening to make a significant 

change in the duties or responsibilities of a member of the 

armed forces not commensurate with the member’s grade’’. 

(b) INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS OF ALLEGATIONS.—Subsection (c) of section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (4)’’; 

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively; 

(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3): 

‘‘(3) A communication described in paragraph (2) shall not be excluded from the protections provided in this section because— 

‘‘(A) the communication was made to a person who participated in an activity that the member reasonably believed to be 

covered by paragraph (2); 

‘‘(B) the communication revealed information that had previously been disclosed; 

‘‘(C) of the member’s motive for making the communication; 

‘‘(D) the communication was not made in writing; 

‘‘(E) the communication was made while the member was off 

duty; and 

‘‘(F) the communication was made during the normal course 

of duties of the member.’’; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
301 

(4) in paragraph (5), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this 

subsection— 

(A) by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (4)(A)’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)(D)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (4)(D)’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘60 days’’ and inserting ‘‘one year’’; and 

(5) in paragraph (6), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this 

subsection, by striking ‘‘outside the immediate chain of command of both the member submitting the allegation and the individual or individuals alleged to have taken the retaliatory action.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘one or both of the following: 

‘‘(A) Outside the immediate chain of command of both the 

member submitting the allegation and the individual or individuals alleged to have taken the retaliatory action. 

‘‘(B) At least one organization higher in the chain of command than the organization of the member submitting the allegation and the individual or individuals alleged to have taken 

the retaliatory action.’’. 

(c) INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS OF UNDERLYING ALLE- GATIONS.—Subsection (d) of section 1034 of title 10, United States 

Code, is amended by striking ‘‘subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection 

(c)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection 

(c)(2)’’. 

(d) REPORTS ON INVESTIGATIONS.—Subsection (e) of section 1034 

of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘subsection (c)(3)(E)’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘subsection (c)(4)(E)’’; 

(B) by inserting ‘‘and the Secretary of the military department concerned’’ after ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘transmitted to the Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘transmitted to such Secretaries’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘and the Secretary of the 

military department concerned’’ after ‘‘the Secretary of Defense’’. 

(e) ACTION IN CASE OF VIOLATIONS.—Section 1034 of title 10, 

United States Code, is further amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h), and (i) as subsections (g), (h), (i), and (j), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): 

‘‘(f) ACTION IN CASE OF VIOLATIONS.—(1) Not later than 30 days 

after receiving a report from the Inspector General under subsection 

(e), the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of the military department concerned, as applicable, shall determine whether 

there is sufficient basis to conclude whether a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred. 

‘‘(2) If the Secretary concerned determines under paragraph (1) 

that a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b) has occurred, 

the Secretary shall— 

‘‘(A) order such action as is necessary to correct the record of 

a personnel action prohibited by subsection (b); and 

‘‘(B) take any appropriate disciplinary action against the individual who committed such prohibited personnel action. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
302 

‘‘(3) If the Secretary concerned determines under paragraph (1) 

that an order for corrective or disciplinary action is not appropriate, 

not later than 30 days after making the determination, such Secretary shall— 

‘‘(A) provide to the Secretary of Defense and the member or 

former member a notice of the determination and the reasons 

for not taking action; and 

‘‘(B) when appropriate, refer the report to the appropriate 

board for the correction of military records for further review 

under subsection (g).’’. 

(f) CORRECTION OF RECORDS.—Subsection (g) of section 1034 of 

title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection (e)(1) of 

this section, is amended in paragraph (3)— 

(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 

‘‘board elects to hold’’ and inserting ‘‘board holds’’; and 

(2) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ‘‘the case is unusually 

complex or otherwise requires’’ and inserting ‘‘the member or 

former member would benefit from’’. 

SEC. 1715. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS OF 

RETALIATORY PERSONNEL ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE 

TO MAKING PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING 

SEXUAL ASSAULT. 

Section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 

by striking ‘‘sexual harassment or’’ and inserting ‘‘rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in violation of sections 920 

through 920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment, or’’. 

SEC. 1716. DESIGNATION AND AVAILABILITY OF SPECIAL VICTIMS’ 

COUNSEL FOR VICTIMS OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES. 

(a) DESIGNATION AND DUTIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, 

is amended by inserting after section 1044d the following new 

section: 

‘‘§ 1044e. Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related 

offenses 

‘‘(a) DESIGNATION; PURPOSES.—The Secretary concerned shall 

designate legal counsel (to be known as ‘Special Victims’ Counsel’) 

for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title who 

is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of whether 

the report of that offense is restricted or unrestricted. 

‘‘(b) TYPES OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED.—The types of 

legal assistance authorized by subsection (a) include the following: 

‘‘(1) Legal consultation regarding potential criminal liability 

of the victim stemming from or in relation to the circumstances 

surrounding the alleged sex-related offense and the victim’s 

right to seek military defense services. 

‘‘(2) Legal consultation regarding the Victim Witness Assistance Program, including— 

‘‘(A) the rights and benefits afforded the victim; 

‘‘(B) the role of the Victim Witness Assistance Program liaison and what privileges do or do not exist between the 

victim and the liaison; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
303 

‘‘(C) the nature of communication made to the liaison in 

comparison to communication made to a Special Victims’ 

Counsel or a legal assistance attorney under section 1044 

of this title. 

‘‘(3) Legal consultation regarding the responsibilities and support provided to the victim by the Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a unit or installation Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, or domestic abuse advocate, to include any privileges that 

may exist regarding communications between those persons and 

the victim. 

‘‘(4) Legal consultation regarding the potential for civil litigation against other parties (other than the Department of Defense). 

‘‘(5) Legal consultation regarding the military justice system, 

including (but not limited to)— 

‘‘(A) the roles and responsibilities of the trial counsel, the 

defense counsel, and investigators; 

‘‘(B) any proceedings of the military justice process in 

which the victim may observe; 

‘‘(C) the Government’s authority to compel cooperation 

and testimony; and 

‘‘(D) the victim’s responsibility to testify, and other duties 

to the court. 

‘‘(6) Accompanying the victim at any proceedings in connection with the reporting, military investigation, and military 

prosecution of the alleged sex-related offense. 

‘‘(7) Legal consultation regarding eligibility and requirements 

for services available from appropriate agencies or offices for 

emotional and mental health counseling and other medical 

services; 

‘‘(8) Legal consultation and assistance— 

‘‘(A) in personal civil legal matters in accordance with 

section 1044 of this title; 

‘‘(B) in any proceedings of the military justice process in 

which a victim can participate as a witness or other party; 

‘‘(C) in understanding the availability of, and obtaining 

any protections offered by, civilian and military protecting 

or restraining orders; and 

‘‘(D) in understanding the eligibility and requirements 

for, and obtaining, any available military and veteran benefits, such as transitional compensation benefits found in 

section 1059 of this title and other State and Federal victims’ compensation programs. 

‘‘(9) Such other legal assistance as the Secretary of Defense 

(or, in the case of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating) may authorize in 

the regulations prescribed under subsection (h). 

‘‘(c) NATURE OF RELATIONSHIP.—The relationship between a Special Victims’ Counsel and a victim in the provision of legal advice 

and assistance shall be the relationship between an attorney and 

client. 

‘‘(d) QUALIFICATIONS.—An individual may not be designated as a 

Special Victims’ Counsel under this section unless the individual— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
304 

‘‘(1) meets the qualifications specified in section 1044(d)(2) of 

this title; and 

‘‘(2) is certified as competent to be designated as a Special 

Victims’ Counsel by the Judge Advocate General of the armed 

force in which the judge advocate is a member or by which the 

civilian attorney is employed. 

‘‘(e) ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY.—(1) Consistent with the 

regulations prescribed under subsection (h), the Judge Advocate 

General (as defined in section 801(1) of this title) under the jurisdiction of the Secretary, and within the Marine Corps the Staff Judge 

Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, is responsible for 

the establishment and supervision of individuals designated as Special Victims’ Counsel. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense (and, in the case of the Coast Guard, 

the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating) shall conduct a periodic evaluation of the Special Victims’ 

Counsel programs operated under this section. 

‘‘(f) AVAILABILITY OF SPECIAL VICTIMS’ COUNSEL.—(1) An individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of 

this title who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense shall be 

offered the option of receiving assistance from a Special Victims’ 

Counsel upon report of an alleged sex-related offense or at the time 

the victim seeks assistance from a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, a military criminal investigator, a victim/witness liaison, a trial counsel, a healthcare provider, or any other personnel designated by the Secretary concerned 

for purposes of this subsection. 

‘‘(2) The assistance of a Special Victims’ Counsel under this subsection shall be available to an individual eligible for military legal 

assistance under section 1044 of this title regardless of whether the 

individual elects unrestricted or restricted reporting of the alleged 

sex-related offense. The individual shall also be informed that the 

assistance of a Special Victims’ Counsel may be declined, in whole 

or in part, but that declining such assistance does not preclude the 

individual from subsequently requesting the assistance of a Special 

Victims’ Counsel. 

‘‘(g) ALLEGED SEX-RELATED OFFENSE DEFINED.—In this section, 

the term ‘alleged sex-related offense’ means any allegation of— 

‘‘(1) a violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 925 of this 

title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 125 of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice); or 

‘‘(2) an attempt to commit an offense specified in a paragraph 

(1) as punishable under section 880 of this title (article 80 of 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

‘‘(h) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.’’. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item 

relating to section 1044d the following new item: 

‘‘1044e. Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses.’’. 

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
305 

(A) QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONS PROVIDING LEGAL AS- SISTANCE.—Section 1044(d)(2) of such title is amended by 

inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘and, 

for purposes of service as a Special Victims’ Counsel under 

section 1044e of this title, meets the additional qualifications specified in subsection (d)(2) of such section.’’. 

(B) INCLUSION IN DEFINITION OF MILITARY LEGAL ASSIST- ANCE.—Section 1044(d)(3)(B) of such title is amended by 

striking ‘‘and 1044d’’ and inserting ‘‘1044d, 1044e, and 

1565b(a)(1)(A)’’. 

(C) ACCESS TO LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND SERVICES.—Section 1565b(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking 

‘‘section 1044’’ and inserting ‘‘sections 1044 and 1044e’’. 

(4) IMPLEMENTATION.—Section 1044e of title 10, United 

States Code, as added by paragraph (1), shall be implemented 

within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(b) ENHANCED TRAINING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of each 

military department, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with 

respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in 

the Department of the Navy, shall implement, consistent with the 

guidelines provided under section 1044e of title 10, United States 

Code, as added by subsection (a), in-depth and advanced training 

for all military and civilian attorneys providing legal assistance 

under section 1044 or 1044e of such title to support victims of alleged sex-related offenses. 

(c) SECRETARY OF DEFENSE IMPLEMENTATION REPORT.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to 

the Coast Guard, shall submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 

Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report describing how the Armed Forces will implement the requirements of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as 

added by subsection (a). 

(2) ADDITIONAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall also be submitted to the independent review panel established by the Secretary of Defense 

under section 576(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758) 

and to the Joint Services Committee on Military Justice. 

Subtitle C—Amendments to Other Laws 

SEC. 1721. TRACKING OF COMPLIANCE OF COMMANDING OFFICERS IN 

CONDUCTING ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE ASSESSMENTS 

FOR PURPOSES OF PREVENTING AND RESPONDING TO 

SEXUAL ASSAULTS. 

Section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1753; 10 U.S.C. 1561 

note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) TRACKING OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE ASSESSMENT COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Secretaries of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
306 

the military departments to verify and track the compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments, 

as required by subsection (a)(3).’’. 

SEC. 1722. ADVANCEMENT OF SUBMITTAL DEADLINE FOR REPORT OF 

INDEPENDENT PANEL ON ASSESSMENT OF MILITARY RESPONSE SYSTEMS TO SEXUAL ASSAULT. 

Section 576(c)(1)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1759) is amended 

by striking ‘‘Eighteen months’’ and inserting ‘‘Twelve months’’. 

SEC. 1723. RETENTION OF CERTAIN FORMS IN CONNECTION WITH RESTRICTED REPORTS AND UNRESTRICTED REPORTS ON 

SEXUAL ASSAULT INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES. 

(a) REQUIREMENT FOR RETENTION.—Subsection (a) of section 577 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1762; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘At the request of a member of the Armed 

Forces who files a Restricted Report on an incident of sexual assault involving the member, the Secretary of Defense shall’’ and 

inserting ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘the Restricted Report’’ and inserting ‘‘a Restricted Report or Unrestricted Report on an incident of sexual 

assault involving a member of the Armed Forces’’. 

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 577. RETENTION OF CERTAIN FORMS IN CONNECTION WITH RESTRICTED REPORTS AND UNRESTRICTED REPORTS ON 

SEXUAL ASSAULT INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

FORCES.’’. 

SEC. 1724. TIMELY ACCESS TO SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE COORDINATORS BY MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES. 

Section 584(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1433; 10 U.S.C. 1561 

note) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): 

‘‘(2) AVAILABILITY FOR RESERVE COMPONENT MEMBERS.—The 

Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure the 

timely access to a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator by any 

member of the National Guard or Reserve who— 

‘‘(A) is the victim of a sexual assault during the performance of duties as a member of the National Guard or Reserves; or 

‘‘(B) is the victim of a sexual assault committed by a 

member of the National Guard or Reserves.’’. 

SEC. 1725. QUALIFICATIONS AND SELECTION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 

PERSONNEL AND REQUIRED AVAILABILITY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINERS. 

(a) QUALIFICATIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT.—Section 1602(e)(2) of the 

Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
307 

(Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 124 Stat. 4431) is 

amended— 

(1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); 

and 

(2) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following 

new subparagraphs: 

‘‘(A) the qualifications necessary for a member of the 

Armed Forces or a civilian employee of the Department of 

Defense to be selected for assignment to duty as a Sexual 

Assault Response and Prevention Program Manager, Sexual Assault Response Coordinator, or Sexual Assault Victim Advocate, whether assigned to such duty on a full-time 

or part-time basis; 

‘‘(B) consistent with section 584(c) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 

81; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note; 125 Stat. 1433), the training, certification, and status of members of the Armed Forces and 

civilian employees of the department assigned to duty as 

Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, and Sexual 

Assault Victim Advocates for the Armed Forces; and’’. 

(b) AVAILABILITY OF SEXUAL ASSAULT NURSE EXAMINERS AT MILI- TARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES.— (1) FACILITIES WITH FULL-TIME EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT.— The Secretary of a military department shall require the assignment of at least one full-time sexual assault nurse examiner to 

each military medical treatment facility under the jurisdiction 

of that Secretary in which an emergency department operates 

24 hours per day. The Secretary may assign additional sexual 

assault nurse examiners based on the demographics of the patients who utilize the military medical treatment facility. 

(2) OTHER FACILITIES.—In the case of a military medical 

treatment facility not covered by paragraph (1), the Secretary of 

the military department concerned shall require that a sexual 

assault nurse examiner be made available to a patient of the facility, consistent with the Department of Justice National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations, 

Adult/Adolescent, when a determination is made regarding the 

patient’s need for the services of a sexual assault nurse examiner. 

(3) QUALIFICATIONS.—A sexual assault nurse examiner assigned under paragraph (1) or made available under paragraph 

(2) shall meet such training and certification requirements as 

are prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. 

(c) REPORT ON TRAINING, QUALIFICATIONS, AND EXPERIENCE OF

SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PERSONNEL.— 

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall prepare a report 

on the review, conducted pursuant to the Secretary of Defense 

Memorandum of May 17, 2013, of the adequacy of the training, 

qualifications, and experience of each member of the Armed 

Forces and civilian employee of the Department of Defense who 

is assigned to a position that includes responsibility for sexual 

assault prevention and response within the Armed Forces for 

the successful discharge of such responsibility. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
308 

(2) REPORT ELEMENTS.—The report shall include the following: 

(A) An assessment of the adequacy of the training and 

certifications required for members and employees described in paragraph (1). 

(B) The number of such members and employees who did 

not have the training, qualifications, or experience required 

to successfully discharge their responsibility for sexual assault prevention and response within the Armed Forces. 

(C) The actions taken by the Secretary of Defense with respect to such members and employees who were found to 

lack the training, qualifications, or experience to successfully discharge such responsibility. 

(D) Such improvements as the Secretary considers appropriate in the process used to select and assign members and 

employees to positions that include responsibility for sexual 

assault prevention and response within the Armed Forces 

in order to ensure the highest caliber candidates are selected and assigned to such positions. 

(3) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

the report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 1726. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE OFFICE FOR DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE 

PROGRAM. 

(a) ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR DUTIES.—Subsection (b) of section 1611 

of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (2); 

(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (3) and inserting a semicolon; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(4) collect and maintain data of the military departments on 

sexual assault in accordance with subsection (e); 

‘‘(5) act as liaison between the Department of Defense and 

other Federal and State agencies on programs and efforts relating to sexual assault prevention and response; and 

‘‘(6) oversee development of strategic program guidance and 

joint planning objectives for resources in support of the sexual 

assault prevention and response program, and make recommendations on modifications to policy, law, and regulations 

needed to ensure the continuing availability of such resources.’’. 

(b) COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DATA.—Such section is 

further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(e) DATA COLLECTION AND MAINTENANCE METRICS.—In carrying 

out the requirements of subsection (b)(4), the Director of the Sexual 

Assault Prevention and Response Office shall develop metrics to 

measure the effectiveness of, and compliance with, training and 

awareness objectives of the military departments on sexual assault 

prevention and response.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
309 

Subtitle D—Studies, Reviews, Policies, and 

Reports 

SEC. 1731. INDEPENDENT REVIEWS AND ASSESSMENTS OF UNIFORM 

CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT CASES. 

(a) ADDITIONAL DUTIES FOR RESPONSE SYSTEMS PANEL.— 

(1) ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIFIED.—The independent 

panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 

(a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), 

known as the ‘‘response systems panel’’, shall conduct the following: 

(A) An assessment of the impact, if any, that removing 

from the chain of command any disposition authority regarding charges preferred under chapter 47 of title 10, 

United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), 

would have on overall reporting and prosecution of sexual 

assault cases. 

(B) An assessment regarding whether the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of Special Victims’ Counsel to 

provide legal assistance under section 1044e of title 10, 

United States Code, as added by section 1716, to victims of 

alleged sex-related offenses should be expanded to include 

legal standing to represent the victim during investigative 

and military justice proceedings in connection with the 

prosecution of the offense. 

(C) An assessment of the feasibility and appropriateness 

of extending to victims of crimes covered by chapter 47 of 

title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice), the right afforded a crime victim in civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection (a)(4) of section 

3771 of title 18, United States Code, and the legal standing 

to seek enforcement of crime victim rights provided by subsection (d) of such section. 

(D) An assessment of the means by which the name, if 

known, and other necessary identifying information of an 

alleged offender that is collected as part of a restricted report of a sexual assault could be compiled into a protected, 

searchable database accessible only to military criminal investigators, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, or other 

appropriate personnel only for the purposes of identifying 

individuals who are subjects of multiple accusations of sexual assault and encouraging victims to make an unrestricted report of sexual assault in those cases in order to 

facilitate increased prosecutions, particularly of serial offenders. The assessment should include an evaluation of 

the appropriate content to be included in the database, as 

well as the best means to maintain the privacy of those 

making a restricted report. 

(E) As part of the comparison of military and civilian 

systems for the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication 

of adult sexual assault crimes, as required by subsection 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
310 

(d)(1)(B) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, an assessment of the opportunities for clemency provided in the military and civilian 

systems, the appropriateness of clemency proceedings in the 

military system, the manner in which clemency is used in 

the military system, and whether clemency in the military 

justice system could be reserved until the end of the military appeals process. 

(F) An assessment of whether the Department of Defense 

should promulgate, and ensure the understanding of and 

compliance with, a formal statement of what accountability, rights, and responsibilities a member of the Armed 

Forces has with regard to matters of sexual assault prevention and response, as a means of addressing those issues 

within the Armed Forces. If the response systems panel recommends such a formal statement, the response systems 

panel shall provide key elements or principles that should 

be included in the formal statement. 

(2) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—The response systems panel 

shall include the results of the assessments required by paragraph (1) in the report required by subsection (c)(1) of section 

576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013, as amended by section 1722. 

(b) ADDITIONAL DUTIES FOR JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS PANEL.— (1) ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIFIED.—The independent 

panel established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection 

(a)(2) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), 

known as the ‘‘judicial proceedings panel’’, shall conduct the following: 

(A) An assessment of the likely consequences of amending 

the definition of rape and sexual assault under section 920 

of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), to expressly cover a situation in 

which a person subject to chapter 47 of title 10, United 

States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), commits a sexual act upon another person by abusing one’s position in the chain of command of the other person to gain 

access to or coerce the other person. 

(B) An assessment of the implementation and effect of 

section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by 

section 1716, and make such recommendations for modification of such section 1044e as the judicial proceedings 

panel considers appropriate. 

(C) An assessment of the implementation and effect of the 

mandatory minimum sentences established by section 

856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) of the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 

1705, and the appropriateness of statutorily mandated minimum sentencing provisions for additional offenses under 

chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice). 

(D) An assessment of the adequacy of the provision of 

compensation and restitution for victims of offenses under 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
311 

chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), and develop recommendations on 

expanding such compensation and restitution, including 

consideration of the options as follows: 

(i) Providing the forfeited wages of incarcerated 

members of the Armed Forces to victims of offenses as 

compensation. 

(ii) Including bodily harm among the injuries meriting compensation for redress under section 939 of title 

10, United States Code (article 139 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice). 

(iii) Requiring restitution by members of the Armed 

Forces to victims of their offenses upon the direction of 

a court-martial. 

(2) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—The judicial proceedings panel 

shall include the results of the assessments required by paragraph (1) in one of the reports required by subsection (c)(2)(B) 

of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. 

SEC. 1732. REVIEW AND POLICY REGARDING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INVESTIGATIVE PRACTICES IN RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS OF UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE 

VIOLATIONS. 

(a) REVIEW.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of 

the practices of the military criminal investigative organizations 

(Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and Air Force Office of Special Investigation) in response to an allegation that a member of the Armed Forces has committed an offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, including the extent to which the military criminal investigative organizations make a recommendation regarding whether an allegation 

appears founded or unfounded. 

(b) POLICY.—After conducting the review required by subsection 

(a), the Secretary of Defense shall develop a uniform policy for the 

Armed Forces, to the extent practicable, regarding the use of case 

determinations to record the results of the investigation of an alleged violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. In developing the policy, the Secretary shall consider the feasibility of adopting case determination methods, such as the uniform crime report, 

used by nonmilitary law enforcement agencies. 

SEC. 1733. REVIEW OF TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROVIDED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ON SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out 

a review of the adequacy of the training and education provided 

members of the Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response. 

(b) RESPONSIVE ACTION.—Upon completion of the review, the Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) identify common core elements that must be included in 

any training or education provided members of the Armed 

Forces on sexual assault prevention and response; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
312 

(2) recommend such other modifications of such training and 

education as the Secretary considers appropriate to address any 

inadequacies identified during the review. 

(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a report containing the results of the review, including the common core elements identified in the review that will be 

included in any training or education provided members of the 

Armed Forces on sexual assault prevention and response. 

SEC. 1734. REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE POLICY ON THE RETENTION OF AND ACCESS TO 

EVIDENCE AND RECORDS RELATING TO SEXUAL ASSAULTS INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) REVIEW OF EVIDENCE AND RECORDS RETENTION AND ACCESS

POLICY.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the 

progress made in developing and implementing the comprehensive 

policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating 

to sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces, which 

was required by section 586 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 

U.S.C. 1561 note). 

(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a report containing the results of the review. In the 

report, the Secretary shall explain how the Secretary has addressed 

each of the matters listed in paragraphs (1) through (11) of subsection (c) of section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 that, at a minimum, were required to be considered in the development of the policy. 

SEC. 1735. REVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND 

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ROLE IN SEXUAL HARASSMENT 

CASES. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a 

review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity for the purposes specified in subsection (b). 

(b) ELEMENTS OF STUDY.—In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall— 

(1) determine whether sexual harassment cases should be 

evaluated or addressed within the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity; 

(2) identify and evaluate how the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity works with the Sexual Assault 

Prevention and Response Office to address sexual harassment 

in the Armed Forces and the current role of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity in sexual harassment 

cases; 

(3) identify and evaluate the resource and personnel gaps, if 

any, in the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity to adequately address sexual harassment cases; and 

(4) identify and assess the capability of the Office of Diversity 

Management and Equal Opportunity to track incidences of sexual harassment cases. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
313 

(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘sexual harassment’’ 

has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense Directive 1350.2, Department of Defense Military Equal Opportunity Program. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

SEC. 1741. ENHANCED PROTECTIONS FOR PROSPECTIVE MEMBERS 

AND NEW MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES DURING 

ENTRY-LEVEL PROCESSING AND TRAINING. 

(a) DEFINING INAPPROPRIATE AND PROHIBITED RELATIONSHIPS, 

COMMUNICATION, CONDUCT, AND CONTACT BETWEEN CERTAIN MEMBERS.— 

(1) POLICY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of a military department and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast 

Guard is operating shall maintain a policy that defines and 

prescribes, for the persons described in paragraph (2), what 

constitutes an inappropriate and prohibited relationship, communication, conduct, or contact, including when such an action 

is consensual, between a member of the Armed Forces described 

in paragraph (2)(A) and a prospective member or member of the 

Armed Forces described in paragraph (2)(B). 

(2) COVERED MEMBERS.—The policy required by paragraph 

(1) shall apply to— 

(A) a member of the Armed Forces who exercises authority or control over, or supervises, a person described in subparagraph (B) during the entry-level processing or training 

of the person; and 

(B) a prospective member of the Armed Forces or a member of the Armed Forces undergoing entry-level processing 

or training. 

(3) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN MEMBERS REQUIRED.—The members of the Armed Forces covered by paragraph (2)(A) shall include, at a minimum, military personnel assigned or attached 

to duty— 

(A) for the purpose of recruiting or assessing persons for 

enlistment or appointment as a commissioned officer, warrant officer, or enlisted member of the Armed Forces; 

(B) at a Military Entrance Processing Station; or 

(C) at an entry-level training facility or school of an 

Armed Force. 

(b) EFFECT OF VIOLATIONS.—A member of the Armed Forces who 

violates the policy required by subsection (a) shall be subject to prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

(c) PROCESSING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—(A) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating 

shall require the processing for administrative separation of 

any member of the Armed Forces described in subsection 

(a)(2)(A) in response to the first substantiated violation by the 

member of the policy required by subsection (a), when the member is not otherwise punitively discharged or dismissed from the 

Armed Forces for that violation. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
314 

(B) The Secretary of a military department shall revise regulations applicable to the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of 

that Secretary as necessary to ensure compliance with the requirement under subparagraph (A). 

(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—(A) In imposing the requirement 

under paragraph (1), the Secretaries shall ensure that any separation decision regarding a member of the Armed Forces is 

based on the full facts of the case and that due process procedures are provided under existing law or regulations or additionally prescribed, as considered necessary by the Secretaries, 

pursuant to subsection (f). 

(B) The requirement imposed by paragraph (1) shall not be 

interpreted to limit or alter the authority of the Secretary of a 

military department and the Secretary of the Department in 

which the Coast Guard is operating to process members of the 

Armed Forces for administrative separation— 

(i) for reasons other than a substantiated violation of the 

policy required by subsection (a); or 

(ii) under other provisions of law or regulation. 

(3) SUBSTANTIATED VIOLATION.—For purposes of paragraph 

(1), a violation by a member of the Armed Forces described in 

subsection (a)(2)(A) of the policy required by subsection (a) shall 

be treated as substantiated if— 

(A) there has been a court-martial conviction for violation 

of the policy, but the adjudged sentence does not include 

discharge or dismissal; or 

(B) a nonjudicial punishment authority under section 

815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), has determined that a member has committed an offense in violation of the policy and 

imposed nonjudicial punishment upon the member. 

(d) REPORT ON NEED FOR UCMJ PUNITIVE ARTICLE.—Not later 

than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing 

the recommendations of the Secretary regarding the need to amend 

chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice), to create an additional article under subchapter 

X of such chapter to address violations of the policy required by subsection (a). 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘entry-level processing or training’’, with respect 

to a member of the Armed Forces, means the period beginning 

on the date on which the member became a member of the 

Armed Forces and ending on the date on which the member 

physically arrives at that member’s first duty assignment following completion of initial entry training (or its equivalent), as 

defined by the Secretary of the military department concerned 

or the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard 

is operating. 

(2) The term ‘‘prospective member of the Armed Forces’’ 

means a person who has had a face-to-face meeting with a 

member of the Armed Forces assigned or attached to duty described in subsection (a)(3)(A) regarding becoming a member of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
315 

the Armed Forces, regardless of whether the person eventually 

becomes a member of the Armed Forces. 

(f) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall issue 

such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this section. The 

Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, to the extent practicable, the 

regulations are uniform for each armed force under the jurisdiction 

of that Secretary. 

SEC. 1742. COMMANDING OFFICER ACTION ON REPORTS ON SEXUAL 

OFFENSES INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED.—A commanding officer who receives a report of a sex-related offense involving a member of the 

Armed Forces in the chain of command of such officer shall act 

upon the report in accordance with subsection (b) immediately after 

receipt of the report by the commanding officer. 

(b) ACTION REQUIRED.—The action required by this subsection 

with respect to a report described in subsection (a) is the referral of 

the report to the military criminal investigation organization with 

responsibility for investigating that offense of the military department concerned or such other investigation service of the military 

department concerned as the Secretary of the military department 

concerned may specify for purposes of this section. 

SEC. 1743. EIGHT-DAY INCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENT IN RESPONSE TO UNRESTRICTED REPORT OF SEXUAL ASSAULT 

IN WHICH THE VICTIM IS A MEMBER OF THE ARMED 

FORCES. 

(a) INCIDENT REPORTING POLICY REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary 

of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast 

Guard is operating shall establish and maintain a policy to require 

the submission by a designated person of a written incident report 

not later than eight days after an unrestricted report of sexual assault has been made in which a member of the Armed Forces is the 

victim. At a minimum, this incident report shall be provided to the 

following: 

(1) The installation commander, if such incident occurred on 

or in the vicinity of a military installation. 

(2) The first officer in the grade of 0–6, and the first general 

officer or flag officer, in the chain of command of the victim. 

(3) The first officer in the grade of 0–6, and the first general 

officer or flag officer, in the chain of command of the alleged 

offender if the alleged offender is a member of the Armed 

Forces. 

(b) PURPOSE OF REPORT.—The purpose of the required incident 

report under subsection (a) is to detail the actions taken or in 

progress to provide the necessary care and support to the victim of 

the assault, to refer the allegation of sexual assault to the appropriate investigatory agency, and to provide initial notification of the 

serious incident when that notification has not already taken place. 

(c) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The report of an incident under subsection 

(a) shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(A) Time/Date/Location of the alleged incident. 

(B) Type of offense alleged. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
316 

(C) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the 

victim. 

(D) Service affiliation, assigned unit, and location of the 

alleged offender, including information regarding whether 

the alleged offender has been temporarily transferred or removed from an assigned billet or ordered to pretrial confinement or otherwise restricted, if applicable. 

(E) Post-incident actions taken in connection with the incident, including the following: 

(i) Referral of the victim to a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator for referral to services available to 

members of the Armed Forces who are victims of sexual 

assault, including the date of each such referral. 

(ii) Notification of incident to appropriate military 

criminal investigative organization, including the organization notified and date of such notification. 

(iii) Receipt and processing status of a request for expedited victim transfer, if applicable. 

(iv) Issuance of any military protective orders in connection with the incident. 

(2) MODIFICATION.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may modify 

the elements required in a report under this section regarding an incident involving a member of the Armed Forces 

(including the Coast Guard when it is operating as service 

in the Department of the Navy) if the Secretary determines 

that such modification will facilitate compliance with best 

practices for such reporting as identified by the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office of the Department of 

Defense. 

(B) COAST GUARD.—The Secretary of the Department in 

which the Coast Guard is operating may modify the elements required in a report under this section regarding an 

incident involving a member of the Coast Guard if the Secretary determines that such modification will facilitate 

compliance with best practices for such reporting as identified by the Coast Guard Office of Work-Life Programs. 

(d) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. 

SEC. 1744. REVIEW OF DECISIONS NOT TO REFER CHARGES OF CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES FOR TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL. 

(a) REVIEW REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall require the 

Secretaries of the military departments to provide for review of 

decisions not to refer charges for trial by court-martial in cases 

where a sex-related offense has been alleged by a victim of the 

alleged offense. 

(2) SPECIFIC REVIEW REQUIREMENTS.—As part of a review 

conducted pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary of a military department shall require that— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
317 

(A) consideration be given to the victim’s statement provided during the course of the criminal investigation regarding the alleged sex-related offense perpetrated against 

the victim; and 

(B) a determination be made whether the victim’s statement and views concerning disposition of the alleged sexrelated offense were considered by the convening authority 

in making the referral decision. 

(b) SEX-RELATED OFFENSE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘sex-related offense’’ means any of the following: 

(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title (article 

125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 

(1) or (2) as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 

80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(c) REVIEW OF CASES NOT REFERRED TO COURT-MARTIAL FOLLOWING STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE RECOMMENDATION OF REFERRAL

FOR TRIAL.—In any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant to 

section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), recommends that charges of a sex-related 

offense be referred for trial by court-martial and the convening authority decides not to refer any charges to a court-martial, the convening authority shall forward the case file to the Secretary of the 

military department concerned for review as a superior authorized 

to exercise general court-martial convening authority. 

(d) REVIEW OF CASES NOT REFERRED TO COURT-MARTIAL FOLLOWING STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE RECOMMENDATION NOT TO REFER

FOR TRIAL.—In any case where a staff judge advocate, pursuant to 

section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice), recommends that charges of a sex-related 

offense should not be referred for trial by court-martial and the convening authority decides not to refer any charges to a court-martial, 

the convening authority shall forward the case file for review to the 

next superior commander authorized to exercise general court-martial convening authority. 

(e) ELEMENTS OF CASE FILE.—A case file forwarded to higher authority for review pursuant to subsection (c) or (d) shall include the 

following: 

(1) All charges and specifications preferred under section 830 

of title 10, United States Code (article 30 of the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice). 

(2) All reports of investigations of such charges, including the 

military criminal investigative organization investigation report 

and the report prepared under section 832 of title 10, United 

States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), 

as amended by section 1702. 

(3) A certification that the victim of the alleged sex-related offense was notified of the opportunity to express views on the victim’s preferred disposition of the alleged offense for consideration by the convening authority. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
318 

(4) All statements of the victim provided to the military criminal investigative organization and to the victim’s chain of command relating to the alleged sex-related offense and any statement provided by the victim to the convening authority expressing the victim’s view on the victim’s preferred disposition of the 

alleged offense. 

(5) The written advice of the staff judge advocate to the convening authority pursuant to section 834 of title 10, United 

States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(6) A written statement explaining the reasons for the convening authority’s decision not to refer any charges for trial by 

court-martial. 

(7) A certification that the victim of the alleged sex-related offense was informed of the convening authority’s decision to forward the case as provided in subsection (c) or (d). 

(f) NOTICE ON RESULTS OR REVIEW.—The victim of the alleged 

sex-related offense shall be notified of the results of the review conducted under subsection (c) or (d) in the manner prescribed by the 

victims and witness assistance program of the Armed Force concerned. 

(g) VICTIM ALLEGATION OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSE.—The Secretary of Defense shall require the Secretaries of the military departments to develop a system to ensure that a victim of a possible sexrelated offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice is given 

the opportunity to state, either at the time of making an unrestricted 

report of the allegation or during the criminal investigation of the 

allegation, whether or not the victim believes that the offense alleged 

is a sex-related offense subject to the requirements of this section. 

SEC. 1745. INCLUSION AND COMMAND REVIEW OF INFORMATION ON 

SEX-RELATED OFFENSES IN PERSONNEL SERVICE 

RECORDS OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

(a) INFORMATION ON REPORTS ON SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If a complaint of a sex-related offense is 

made against a member of the Armed Forces and the member 

is convicted by court-martial or receives non-judicial punishment or punitive administrative action for such sex-related offense, a notation to that effect shall be placed in the personnel 

service record of the member, regardless of the member’s grade. 

(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the inclusion of information in 

personnel service records under paragraph (1) is to alert commanders to the members of their command who have received 

courts-martial conviction, non-judicial punishment, or punitive 

administrative action for sex-related offenses in order to reduce 

the likelihood that repeat offenses will escape the notice of commanders. 

(b) LIMITATION ON PLACEMENT.—A notation under subsection (a) 

may not be placed in the restricted section of the personnel service 

record of a member. 

(c) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) may be construed to prohibit or limit the capacity of a member of the Armed 

Forces to challenge or appeal the placement of a notation, or location of placement of a notation, in the member’s personnel service 

record in accordance with procedures otherwise applicable to such 

challenges or appeals. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
319 

(d) COMMAND REVIEW OF HISTORY OF SEX-RELATED OFFENSES OF

MEMBERS UPON ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER TO NEW UNIT.— 

(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Under uniform regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the commanding officer of 

a facility, installation, or unit to which a member of the Armed 

Forces described in paragraph (2) is permanently assigned or 

transferred shall review the history of sex-related offenses as 

documented in the personnel service record of the member in 

order to familiarize such officer with such history of the member. 

(2) COVERED MEMBERS.—A member of the Armed Forces described in this paragraph is a member of the Armed Forces 

who, at the time of assignment or transfer as described in paragraph (1), has a history of one or more sex-related offenses as 

documented in the personnel service record of such member or 

such other records or files as the Secretary shall specify in the 

regulations prescribed under paragraph (1). 

SEC. 1746. PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AT MILITARY SERVICE 

ACADEMIES. 

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the United 

States Air Force Academy include a section in the curricula of that 

military service academy that outlines honor, respect, and character 

development as such pertain to the issue of preventing sexual assault in the Armed Forces. Such curricula section shall include a 

brief history of the problem of sexual assault in the Armed Forces, 

a definition of sexual assault, information relating to reporting a 

sexual assault, victims’ rights, and dismissal and dishonorable discharge for offenders. Training in such section in the curricula shall 

be provided within 14 days after the initial arrival of a new cadet 

or midshipman at that military service academy and repeated annually thereafter. 

SEC. 1747. REQUIRED NOTIFICATION WHENEVER MEMBERS OF THE 

ARMED FORCES ARE COMPLETING STANDARD FORM 86 OF 

THE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY POSITIONS. 

(a) NOTIFICATION OF POLICY.—Whenever a member of the Armed 

Forces is required to complete Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security Positions in connection with an application, investigation, or reinvestigation for a security clearance, the 

member shall be notified of the policy described in subsection (b) regarding question 21 of such form. 

(b) POLICY DESCRIBED.—The policy referred to in subsection (a) is 

the policy of instructing an individual to answer ‘‘no’’ to question 21 

of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security Positions with respect to consultation with a health care professional 

if— 

(1) the individual is a victim of a sexual assault; and 

(2) the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional or 

mental health condition strictly in relation to the sexual assault. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
320 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions 

SEC. 1751. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMMANDING OFFICER RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMMAND CLIMATE FREE OF RETALIATION. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) commanding officers in the Armed Forces are responsible 

for establishing a command climate in which sexual assault allegations are properly managed and fairly evaluated and in 

which a victim can report criminal activity, including sexual 

assault, without fear of retaliation, including ostracism and 

group pressure from other members of the command; 

(2) the failure of commanding officers to maintain such a 

command climate is an appropriate basis for relief from their 

command positions; and 

(3) senior officers should evaluate subordinate commanding 

officers on their performance in establishing a command climate as described in paragraph (1) during the regular periodic 

counseling and performance appraisal process prescribed by the 

Armed Force concerned for inclusion in the systems of records 

maintained and used for assignment and promotion selection 

boards. 

SEC. 1752. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON DISPOSITION OF CHARGES INVOLVING CERTAIN SEXUAL MISCONDUCT OFFENSES 

UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE 

THROUGH COURTS-MARTIAL. 

(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) any charge regarding an offense specified in subsection (b) 

should be disposed of by court-martial, rather than by non-judicial punishment or administrative action; and 

(2) in the case of any charge regarding an offense specified in 

subsection (b) that is disposed of by non-judicial punishment or 

administrative action, rather than by court-martial, the disposition authority should include in the case file a justification for 

the disposition of the charge by non-judicial punishment or administrative action, rather than by court-martial. 

(b) COVERED OFFENSES.—An offense specified in this subsection is 

any of the following offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United 

States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice): 

(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of such title (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(2) Forcible sodomy under section 925 of such title (article 

125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

(3) An attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph 

(1) or (2), as punishable under section 880 of such title (article 

80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). 

SEC. 1753. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON THE DISCHARGE IN LIEU OF 

COURT-MARTIAL OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES 

WHO COMMIT SEX-RELATED OFFENSES. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the Armed Forces should be exceedingly sparing in discharging in lieu of court-martial members of the Armed Forces 

who have committed rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy, or 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
321 

attempts to commit such offenses, and should do so only when 

the facts of the case clearly warrant such discharge; 

(2) whenever possible, the victims of offenses referred to in 

paragraph (1) shall be consulted prior to the determination regarding whether to discharge the members who committed such 

offenses; 

(3) convening authorities should consider the views of victims 

of offenses referred to in paragraph (1) when determining 

whether to discharge the members who committed such offenses 

in lieu of trying such members by court-martial; and 

(4) the discharge of any member who is discharged as described in paragraph (1) should be characterized as Other Than 

Honorable. 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

AUTHORIZATIONS 

SEC. 2001. SHORT TITLE. 

This division may be cited as the ‘‘Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014’’. 

SEC. 2002. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIED BY LAW. 

(a) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AFTER THREE YEARS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in 

titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions 

to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on 

the later of— 

(1) October 1, 2016; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for 

military construction for fiscal year 2017. 

(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations 

for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing 

projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations 

of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been 

obligated before the later of— 

(1) October 1, 2016; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for 

fiscal year 2017 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to 

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 

Program. 

TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2102. Family housing. 

Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
322 

Sec. 2104. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military 

Academy, New York. 

Sec. 2105. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project. 

Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project. 

Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

Sec. 2108. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects. 

Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and 

available for military construction projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction 

projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, 

and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Army: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alaska ..................... Fort Wainwright ....................................... $103,000,000 

Colorado .................. Fort Carson, Colorado ............................. $242,200,000 

Florida .................... Eglin Air Force Base ................................ $4,700,000 

Georgia .................... Fort Gordon .............................................. $61,000,000 

Hawaii .................... Fort Shafter .............................................. $70,000,000 

Kansas ..................... Fort Leavenworth ..................................... $17,000,000 

Kentucky ................. Fort Campbell, Kentucky ......................... $4,800,000 

Maryland ................ Aberdeen Proving Ground ....................... $21,000,000 

Fort Detrick ............................................... $7,100,000 

Missouri .................. Fort Leonard Wood .................................. $90,700,000 

North Carolina ....... Fort Bragg ................................................ $5,900,000 

Texas ....................... Fort Bliss .................................................. $46,800,000 

Virginia ................... Joint Base Langley-Eustis ....................... $50,000,000 

Washington ............. Joint Base Lewis-McChord ...................... $144,000,000 

Yakima ...................................................... $9,100,00 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and 

available for military construction projects outside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installations or locations outside the United 

States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table: 

Army: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Japan ....................... Kyoga-Misaki ............................................. $33,000,000 

Marshall Islands ..... Kwajalein Atoll ......................................... $63,000,000 

SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING. 

(a) CONSTRUCTION AND ACQUISITION.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 

2103 and available for military family housing functions as speciVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00354 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
323 

fied in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army 

may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, 

in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table: 

Army: Family Housing 

Country Installation Units Amount 

Germany .................. South Camp Vilseck 29 ............................. $16,600,000 

Wisconsin ................ Fort McCoy ............. 56 ............................. $23,000,000 

(b) PLANNING AND DESIGN.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out 

architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family 

housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,408,000. 

SEC. 2103. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 

military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as 

specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of 

title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 

2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(2) $64,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 2119) for cadet barracks increment 2 at the United States 

Military Academy, New York). 

SEC. 2104. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION OF CADET BARRACKS AT 

UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY, NEW YORK. 

No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction of 

increment 2 of the Cadet Barracks at the United States Military 

Academy, New York, as authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division 

B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), until the Secretary of the 

Army certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary intends to award a contract for the renovation of MacArthur 

Short Barracks at the United States Military Academy concurrent 

with assuming beneficial occupancy of the renovated Scott Barracks 

at the United States Military Academy. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
324 

SEC. 2105. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL 

YEAR 2004 PROJECT. 

(a) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.—In connection with the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, 

for construction of a Research and Development Loading Facility, 

the Secretary of the Army may carry out a military construction 

project in the amount of $4,500,000 to complete work on the facility 

within the initial scope of the project. 

(b) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of the Army 

shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of title 

10, United States Code, regarding the project described in subsection (a). 

SEC. 2106. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2010 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 

2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) for 

Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, for construction of APS Warehouses, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 74,976 square meters of 

hardstand parking, 22,741 square meters of access roads, a 6 megawatt power plant, and 50,724 square meters of humidity-controlled 

warehouses. 

SEC. 2107. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 

2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for 

Fort Lewis, Washington, for construction of a Regional Logistic 

Support Complex at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may 

construct up to 98,381 square yards of Organizational Vehicle Parking. 

SEC. 2108. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2010 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of 

Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2627), the authorizations set forth in 

the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act 

(126 Stat. 2628) and extended by section 2106 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2121), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 

funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is 

later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations 

State Installation 

or Location Project Amount 

Virginia ............ Fort Belvoir Road and Access Control 

Point ................................ $9,500,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
325 

Army: Extension of 2010 Project Authorizations—Continued 

State Installation 

or Location Project Amount 

Washington ....... Fort Lewis .... Fort Lewis-McChord AFB 

Joint Access .................... $9,000,000 

Kuwait .............. Camp 

Arifjian.

APS Warehouses ................ $82,000,000 

SEC. 2109. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2011 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSIONS.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of 

Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth 

in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act 

(124 Stat. 4437), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the 

date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Army: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations 

State Installation or 

Location Project Amount 

California ..... Presidio of Monterey.Advanced Individual Training Barracks ..................... $63,000,000 

Georgia ......... Fort Benning .......... Land Acquisition ................. $12,200,000 

New Mexico .. White Sands Missile Range.Barracks ............................... $29,000,000 

Germany ....... Wiesbaden Air Base Access Control Point ............ $5,100,000 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2202. Family housing. 

Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy. 

Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project. 

Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and 

available for military construction projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction 

projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, 

and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
326 

Navy: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

California ................ Barstow ....................................................... $14,998,000 

Camp Pendleton ......................................... $13,124,000 

Coronado ..................................................... $8,910,000 

Point Mugu ................................................. $24,667,000 

Port Hueneme ............................................. $33,600,000 

San Diego .................................................... $34,331,000 

Twentynine Palms ...................................... $33,437,000 

Florida .................... Jacksonville ................................................ $20,752,000 

Key West ...................................................... $14,001,000 

Mayport ....................................................... $16,093,000 

Georgia .................... Albany ......................................................... $16,610,000 

Savannah .................................................... $61,717,000 

Guam ...................... Joint Region Marianas .............................. $318,377,000 

Hawaii .................... Kaneohe Bay ............................................... $236,982,000 

Pearl City .................................................... $30,100,000 

Pearl Harbor ............................................... $57,998,000 

Illinois ..................... Great Lakes ................................................. $35,851,000 

Maine ...................... Bangor ......................................................... $13,800,000 

Kittery .......................................................... $11,522,000 

Maryland ................ Fort Meade .................................................. $83,988,000 

Nevada .................... Fallon .......................................................... $11,334,000 

North Carolina ....... Camp Lejeune ............................................. $77,999,000 

New River ................................................... $45,863,000 

Oklahoma ............... Tinker Air Force Base ................................ $14,144,000 

Rhode Island .......... Newport ....................................................... $12,422,000 

South Carolina ....... Charleston ................................................... $73,932,000 

Virginia ................... Dam Neck .................................................... $10,587,000 

Norfolk ........................................................ $3,380,000 

Quantico ...................................................... $38,374,000 

Yorktown ..................................................... $18,700,000 

Washington ............. Bremerton ................................................... $18,189,000 

Whidbey Island ........................................... $117,649,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and 

available for military construction projects outside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction 

projects for the installation or location outside the United States, 

and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Navy: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Djibouti ..................... Camp Lemonier .......................................... $29,000,000 

Japan ........................ Camp Butler ............................................... $5,820,000 

Yokosuka ..................................................... $7,568,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
327 

SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering 

services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not 

to exceed $4,438,000. 

SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using 

amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 and available for military family housing 

functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing 

units in an amount not to exceed $68,969,000. 

SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 

military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as 

specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of 

title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 

2201 of this Act and the projects described in paragraphs (2) and 

(3) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(2) $357,877,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1666) for an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap, Washington). 

(3) $68,196,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 

Stat. 2633) for ramp parking at Joint Region Marianas, 

Guam). 

SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2011 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 

2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4441) for 

Southwest Asia, Bahrain, for construction of Navy Central Command Ammunition Magazines, the Secretary of the Navy may construct additional Type C earth covered magazines (to provide a 

project total of eighteen), ten new modular storage magazines, an 

inert storage facility, a maintenance and ground support equipment 

facility, concrete pads for portable ready service lockers, and associated supporting facilities using appropriations available for the 

project. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
328 

SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2012 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 

2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) for 

Kitsap, Washington, for construction of Explosives Handling Wharf 

No. 2, the Secretary of the Navy may construct new hardened facilities in lieu of hardening existing structures and a new facility to replace the existing Coast Guard Maritime Force Protection Unit and 

the Naval Undersea Warfare Command unhardened facilities using 

appropriations available for the project. 

SEC. 2207. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2011 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of 

Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth 

in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act 

(124 Stat. 4441), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the 

date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Navy: Extension of 2011 Project Authorizations 

State/Country Installation or Location Project Amount 

Bahrain ..................... Southwest Asia ........ Navy Central Command Ammunition 

Magazines ............ $89,280,000 

Guam ........................ Naval Activities, 

Guam.

Defense Access 

Roads Improvements .................... $66,730,000 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2302. Family housing. 

Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units. 

Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force. 

Sec. 2305. Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 

project. 

Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. 

Sec. 2307. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project. 

SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and 

available for military construction projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United 

States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
329 

Air Force: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Arizona ................................ Luke Air Force Base ................... $26,900,000 

California ............................ Beale Air Force Base .................. $62,000,000 

Florida ................................. Tyndall Air Force Base .............. $9,100,000 

Guam ................................... Joint Region Marianas .............. $176,230,000 

Hawaii ................................. Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam.$4,800,000 

Kansas ................................. McConnell Air Force Base ......... $219,120,000 

Kentucky .............................. Fort Campbell ............................ $8,000,000 

Mariana Islands ................. Saipan ........................................ $29,300,000 

Maryland ............................. Fort Meade ................................. $358,000,000 

Joint Base Andrews ................... $30,000,000 

Missouri ............................... Whiteman Air Force Base .......... $5,900,000 

New Mexico ......................... Cannon Air Force Base .............. $34,100,000 

Holloman Air Force Base .......... $2,250,000 

Kirtland Air Force Base ............ $30,500,000 

Nevada ................................ Nellis Air Force Base ................. $78,500,000 

.............................................. ...................................................... ..............................

North Dakota ...................... Minot Air Force Base ................. $23,830,000 

Oklahoma ............................ Altus Air Force Base .................. $30,850,000 

Tinker Air Force Base ................ $8,600,000 

Texas .................................... Fort Bliss .................................... $3,350,000 

Utah ..................................... Hill Air Force Base .................... $32,000,000 

Virginia ............................... Joint Base Langley-Eustis ......... $4,800,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and 

available for military construction projects outside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the 

Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the 

United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Air Force: Outside the United States 

Country Installation Amount 

Greenland .................................. Thule AB .................................... $43,904,000 

United Kingdom ....................... RAF Lakenheath ........................ $22,047,000 

SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304 and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the 

construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount 

not to exceed $4,267,000. 

SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS. 

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using 

amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriaVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00361 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
330 

tions in section 2304 and available for military family housing 

functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $72,093,000. 

SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 

military family housing functions of the Department of the Air 

Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of 

title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 

2301 of this Act and the project described in paragraph (2) of this 

subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(2) $69,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1670) for the United States Strategic Command Headquarters at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska). 

SEC. 2305. LIMITATION ON PROJECT AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT 

CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2014 PROJECT. 

No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction of 

a maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport storage facility in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 

as authorized by section 2301(a), until the Secretary of the Air Force 

submits a report to the congressional defense committees that provides— 

(1) a summary of alternatives considered to support divertfield operations associated with Andersen Air Force Base; 

(2) a description of the overall construction requirements to 

support divert-field operations associated with Andersen Air 

Force Base and any other alternative considered; and 

(3) a comparison of the costs and benefits of leasing, as compared to purchasing real estate in fee, that supports the entirety 

of the divert-field requirement. 

SEC. 2306. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT. 

The table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 

126 Stat. 2126) is amended in the item relating to Andersen Air 

Force Base, Guam, for construction of a hangar by striking 

‘‘$58,000,000’’ in the amount column and inserting ‘‘$128,000,000’’. 

SEC. 2307. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2011 PROJECT. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of 

Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in 

the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act 

(124 Stat. 4444), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2014, or the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
331 

date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project Authorization 

State Installation or 

Location Project Amount 

Bahrain .......... Southwest Asia ..... North Apron Expansion .. $45,000,000 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects. 

Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies. 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, 

defense-wide. 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and 

available for military construction projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of 

Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United 

States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alaska ................................ Clear Air Force Base .................... $17,204,000 

Fort Greely .................................... $82,000,000 

California .......................... Brawley ......................................... $23,095,000 

Defense Distribution Depot-Tracy $37,554,000 

Miramar ........................................ $6,000,000 

Colorado ............................ Fort Carson ................................... $22,282,000 

Florida ............................... Hurlburt Field .............................. $7,900,000 

Jacksonville .................................. $7,500,000 

Key West ........................................ $3,600,000 

Panama City ................................. $2,600,000 

Tyndall Air Force Base ................ $9,500,000 

Georgia .............................. Fort Benning ................................ $43,335,000 

Fort Stewart ................................. $44,504,000 

Hunter Army Airfield ................... $13,500,000 

Moody Air Force Base .................. $3,800,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
332 

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States—Continued 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Hawaii ............................... Ford Island ................................... $2,615,000 

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam $2,800,000 

Kentucky ............................ Fort Campbell .............................. $124,211,000 

Fort Knox ...................................... $303,023,000 

Maryland ........................... Aberdeen Proving Ground ........... $210,000,000 

Bethesda Naval Hospital ............. $66,800,000 

Massachusetts ................... Hanscom Air Force Base ............. $36,213,000 

New Jersey ........................ Joint Base Mcguire-DixLakehurst .................................. $10,000,000 

New Mexico ....................... Holloman Air Force Base ............ $81,400,000 

North Carolina ................. Camp Lejeune ............................... $43,377,000 

Fort Bragg .................................... $172,065,000 

North Dakota .................... Minot Air Force Base ................... $6,400,000 

Oklahoma .......................... Altus Air Force Base .................... $2,100,000 

Tinker Air Force Base .................. $36,000,000 

Pennsylvania ..................... Defense Distribution Depot New 

Cumberland .............................. $9,000,000 

South Carolina ................. Beaufort ........................................ $41,324,000 

Tennessee ........................... Arnold Air Force Base ................. $2,200,000 

Texas .................................. Joint Base San Antonio ............... $12,600,000 

Virginia ............................. Dam Neck ..................................... $11,147,000 

Defense Distribution Depot Richmond .......................................... $87,000,000 

Joint Expeditionary Base Little 

Creek - Story ............................. $30,404,000 

Pentagon ....................................... $57,600,000 

Quantico ........................................ $40,586,000 

Washington ....................... Whidbey Island ............................ $10,000,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and 

available for military construction projects outside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of 

Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United 

States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Bahrain Island ...... Southwest Asia ........................................ $45,400,000 

Belgium .................. Brussels ................................................... $67,613,000 

Germany ................. Kaiserlautern Air Base ........................... $49,907,000 

Ramstein Air Base .................................. $98,762,000 

Weisbaden ................................................ $109,655,000 

Japan ...................... Atsugi ....................................................... $4,100,000 

Iwakuni ................................................... $34,000,000 

Kadena Air Base ..................................... $38,792,000 

Kyoga-Misaki ........................................... $15,000,000 

Torri Commo Station .............................. $71,451,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
333 

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States—Continued 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Yokosuka .................................................. $10,600,000 

Korea ....................... Camp Walker ........................................... $52,164,000 

United Kingdom .... Royal Air Force Lakenheath .................. $69,638,000 

Royal Air Force Mildenhall .................... $84,629,000 

SEC. 2402. AUTHORIZED ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS. 

(a) INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and 

available for energy conservation projects inside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of 

Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 

173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations 

inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States 

State Installation or Location Amount 

Alabama ....................... Anniston Army Depot ....................... $2,700,000 

California ..................... MCAS Miramar ................................ $17,968,000 

Parks DRTA ...................................... $4,150,000 

Florida .......................... NAS Jacksonville .............................. $2,840,000 

Hawaii .......................... Camp Smith ...................................... $7,966,000 

Hickam .............................................. $3,100,000 

Hickam .............................................. $3,000,000 

Idaho ............................. Mountain Home ................................ $2,630,000 

Kansas .......................... Tokepka Readiness Center ............... $2,050,000 

Massachusetts .............. Devens ................................................ $2,600,000 

New York ...................... US Military Academy ....................... $3,200,000 

South Carolina ............. Shaw .................................................. $2,500,000 

Texas ............................. NAS Corpus Christi ......................... $2,340,000 

Sheppard ........................................... $3,779,000 

Laughlin ............................................ $2,800,000 

Utah .............................. Dugway Proving Ground ................. $9,966,000 

Tooele Army Depot ............................ $5,900,000 

Tooele Army Depot ............................ $5,500,000 

Tooele Army Depot ............................ $4,300,000 

Virginia ......................... NSA Hampton Roads ....................... $4,060,000 

Pentagon ............................................ $2,120,000 

Various Locations ........ Various Locations ............................. $20,476,000 

(b) OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.—Using amounts appropriated 

pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403 and 

available for energy conservation projects outside the United States 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of 

Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 

173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations 

outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
334 

Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States 

Country Installation or Location Amount 

Germany .................................. Ramstein ................................ $2,140,000 

Greenland ................................ Thule ...................................... $5,175,000 

Italy .......................................... NAS Sigonella ....................... $3,300,000 

Japan ....................................... CFA Sasebo ............................ $14,766,000 

Yokota ..................................... $5,674,000 

Various Locations .................... Various Locations .................. $3,000,000 

SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and 

military family housing functions of the Department of Defense 

(other than the military departments), as specified in the funding 

table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of 

title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 

2401 of this Act and the projects described in paragraphs (2) 

through (11) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(2) $190,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2401(a) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Fort Knox, 

Kentucky). 

(3) $135,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2401(a) for a Public Health Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland). 

(4) $45,600,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 2128) for NSAW Recapitalize Building #1 at Fort Meade, 

Maryland). 

(5) $20,800,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 2129) for the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System Complex at Deveselu, Romania). 

(6) $175,639,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1672) for a data center at Fort Meade, Maryland). 

(7) $11,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center Phase III at Joint 

Base Andrews, Maryland). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
335 

(8) $134,900,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center Phase III at Joint 

Base San Antonio, Texas). 

(9) $715,863,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under 

section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 

Stat. 1673) for a hospital at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany). 

(10) $412,869,000 (the balance of the amount authorized 

under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111– 

84; 123 Stat. 2640) for a hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas). 

(11) $41,913,000 (the balance of the amount authorized as a 

Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by title X of the 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 

123 Stat. 1888) for a data center at Camp Williams, Utah). 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization 

Authorizations 

SEC. 2411. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction and land acquisition for 

chemical demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.— 

Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of 

title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under subsection (a) and the project described in paragraph (2) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following: 

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under 

subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(2) $36,433,000 (the balance of the amount authorized for 

ammunition demilitarization at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106– 

65; 113 Stat. 835), as most recently amended by section 2412 

of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011 (division B Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450). 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY 

ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
336 

SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount 

not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated 

for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States. 

SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2013, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, 

for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE 

FORCES FACILITIES 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and 

land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects. 

Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects. 

Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2611. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project. 

Sec. 2612. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects. 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and 

Authorization of Appropriations 

SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Army National Guard: Inside the United States 

State Location Amount 

Alabama ................... Decatur ....................................................... $4,000,000 

Arkansas .................. Fort Chaffee ............................................... $21,000,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
337 

Army National Guard: Inside the United States—Continued 

State Location Amount 

Florida ..................... Pinellas Park ............................................. $5,700,000 

Illinois ...................... Kankakee .................................................... $42,000,000 

Massachusetts .......... Camp Edwards .......................................... $19,000,000 

Michigan .................. Camp Grayling .......................................... $17,000,000 

Minnesota ................. Stillwater ................................................... $17,000,000 

Mississippi ............... Camp Shelby ............................................. $3,000,000 

................................... Pascagoula ................................................. $4,500,000 

Missouri ................... Macon ......................................................... $9,100,000 

Whiteman AFB .......................................... $5,000,000 

New York .................. New York ................................................... $31,000,000 

Ohio .......................... Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant .......... $5,200,000 

Pennsylvania ............ Fort Indiantown Gap ................................ $40,000,000 

Puerto Rico ............... Camp Santiago .......................................... $5,600,000 

South Carolina ........ Greenville ................................................... $26,000,000 

Texas ........................ Fort Worth ................................................. $14,270,000 

Wyoming .................. Afton ........................................................... $10,200,000 

SEC. 2602. AUTHORIZED ARMY RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND 

ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the 

United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Army Reserve 

State Location Amount 

California ..................... Camp Parks .......................................... $17,500,000 

Fort Hunter Liggett .............................. $16,500,000 

Maryland ...................... Bowie ..................................................... $25,500,000 

North Carolina ............. Fort Bragg ............................................. $24,500,000 

New Jersey ................... Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst ..... $36,200,000 

New York ...................... Bullville ................................................. $14,500,000 

Wisconsin ...................... Fort McCoy ............................................ $23,400,000 

SEC. 2603. AUTHORIZED NAVY RESERVE AND MARINE CORPS RESERVE 

CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps 

Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set 

forth in the following table: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
338 

Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve 

State Location Amount 

California ...................... March Air Force Base .......................... $11,086,000 

Missouri ......................... Kansas City .......................................... $15,020,000 

Tennessee ....................... Memphis ............................................... $4,330,000 

SEC. 2604. AUTHORIZED AIR NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 

military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations 

inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Air National Guard 

State Location Amount 

Alabama ......................... Birmingham International Airport .... $8,500,000 

Indiana ........................... Hulman Regional Airport ................... $7,300,000 

Maryland ...................... Fort Meade .......................................... $4,000,000 

Martin State Airport ........................... $8,000,000 

Montana ......................... Great Falls International Airport ...... $22,000,000 

New York ........................ Fort Drum ........................................... $4,700,000 

Ohio ................................ Springfield Beckley-Map .................... $7,200,000 

Pennsylvania .................. Fort Indiantown Gap .......................... $7,700,000 

Rhode Island .................. Quonset State Airport ......................... $6,000,000 

Tennessee ........................ Mcghee-Tyson Airport ......................... $18,000,000 

SEC. 2605. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND 

LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS. 

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard 

and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the 

Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out 

military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: 

Air Force Reserve 

State Location Amount 

California ..................... March Air Force Base ........................... $19,900,000 

Florida .......................... Homestead Air Reserve Base ................ $9,800,000 

Oklahoma ..................... Tinker Air Force Base .......................... $12,200,000 

SEC. 2606. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATIONAL GUARD 

AND RESERVE. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after SepVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00370 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
339 

tember 30, 2013, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of 

title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of 

land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 

(b) LIMITATION ON COMMENCING CERTAIN PROJECTS.—No 

amounts may be obligated or expended for the projects associated 

with the 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility at Fort Meade, 

Maryland, or the Cyber/ISR Facility at Martin State Airport, 

Maryland, as authorized by section 2604, until the date on which 

the Commander of the United States Cyber Command certifies to 

the congressional defense committees, and provides adequate supporting documentation, that— 

(1) the scope of the military construction projects referred to 

in this subsection is consistent with the organizational manning 

construct being developed by the United States Cyber Command; 

(2) units operating within such facilities will be trained to the 

readiness standards set by the Armed Force concerned and the 

United States Cyber Command for the missions to which these 

units will be assigned; 

(3) plans for proper mitigation measures will be implemented 

to prevent inadvertent disclosure of classified information; and 

(4) rules exist or will be developed to control access to classified systems operating pursuant to authorities under title 10, 

United States Code, when operations are conducted pursuant to 

authorities under title 32, United States Code. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

SEC. 2611. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2013 PROJECT. 

In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 

2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2135) for Fort 

Des Moines, Iowa, for construction of a Joint Reserve Center at that 

location, the Secretary of the Navy may, instead of constructing a 

new facility at Camp Dodge, acquire up to approximately 20 acres 

to construct a Joint Reserve Center and associated supporting facilities in the greater Des Moines, Iowa, area using amounts appropriated for the project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 of such Act (126 Stat. 2136). 

SEC. 2612. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 

2011 PROJECTS. 

(a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of 

Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth 

in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 2602, 

and 2604 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452, 4453, 4454), shall remain in 

effect until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act 

authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, 

whichever is later. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
340 

(b) TABLE.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: 

Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorizations 

State Installation or Location Project Amount 

Puerto Rice ............... Camp Santiago ....... Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range $9,200,000 

Tennessee ................. Nashville International Airport .. Intelligence Group 

and Remotely Piloted Aircraft Remote Split Operations Group ........ $5,500,000 

Virginia .................... Fort Story ................ Army Reserve Center ......................... $11,000,000 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND 

CLOSURE ACTIVITIES 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Sec. 2711. Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure 

(BRAC) round. 

Sec. 2712. Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability 

of military health care in National Capital Region. 

Sec. 2713. Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of 

Appropriations 

SEC. 2701. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES FUNDED THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 

beginning after September 30, 2013, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and 

Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101– 

510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of 

Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of such 

Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in section 

4601. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
341 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

SEC. 2711. PROHIBITION ON CONDUCTING ADDITIONAL BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE (BRAC) ROUND. 

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional 

Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. 

SEC. 2712. ELIMINATION OF QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF MILITARY HEALTH 

CARE IN NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 

Section 1674(c) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public 

Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 483) is amended by striking ‘‘on a quarterly 

basis’’. 

SEC. 2713. REPORT ON 2005 BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT JOINT 

BASING INITIATIVE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the 2005 base closure and realignment 

joint basing initiative. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements: 

(1) An analysis and explanation of the costs necessary to implement the joint basing initiative. 

(2) An analysis and explanation of any savings achieved to 

date and planned in future years, including quantifiable goals 

and a timeline for meeting such goals. 

(3) A description of implementation challenges and other lessons learned. 

(4) An assessment of any additional savings that could be 

achieved through more rigorous management and streamlined 

administration of joint bases. 

(5) Any other matters the Under Secretary considers appropriate. 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY 

CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes 

Sec. 2801. Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified minor military construction authority for laboratory revitalization projects. 

Sec. 2802. Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with private developers of housing. 

Sec. 2803. Military construction standards to improve force protection. 

Sec. 2804. Application of cash payments received for utilities and services. 

Sec. 2805. Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing investment authority. 

Sec. 2806. Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization 

projects. 

Sec. 2807. Policies and requirements regarding overseas military construction and 

closure and realignment of United States military installations in foreign countries. 

Sec. 2808. Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in certain areas 

outside the United States. 

Sec. 2809. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
342 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

Sec. 2811. Development of master plans for major military installations. 

Sec. 2812. Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses associated with real property leases and easements. 

Sec. 2813. Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt of 

utility services as consideration for utility systems conveyances. 

Sec. 2814. Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real property. 

Sec. 2815. Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pin ̃ on Canyon Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment 

Sec. 2821. Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period 

covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment. 

Sec. 2822. Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region. 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances 

Sec. 2831. Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California. 

Sec. 2832. Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, California. 

Sec. 2833. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. 

Sec. 2834. Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 

Sec. 2835. Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah. 

Sec. 2836. Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch 

Mountains, Utah. 

Sec. 2837. Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Sec. 2841. Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement. 

Sec. 2842. Establishment of military divers memorial. 

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program 

and Military Family Housing Changes 

SEC. 2801. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO UTILIZE 

UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY FOR LABORATORY REVITALIZATION PROJECTS. 

(a) MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 

2805(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘not more than 

$2,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘not more than $4,000,000, notwithstanding subsection (c)’’; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: ‘‘For purposes of this subsection, an unspecified minor military construction project is a military construction project that (notwithstanding subsection (a)) has an approved cost equal to or less than $4,000,000.’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘2016’’ and inserting ‘‘2018’’. 

(b) NO APPLICATION TO CURRENT PROJECTS.—The amendments 

made by subsection (a) do not apply to any laboratory revitalization 

project for which the design phase has been completed as of the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 2802. REPEAL OF SEPARATE AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIPS WITH PRIVATE DEVELOPERS OF HOUSING. 

(a) REPEAL.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
343 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 2837 of title 10, United States 

Code, is repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 169 of such title is amended 

by striking the item relating to section 2837. 

(b) EFFECT ON EXISTING CONTRACTS.—The repeal of section 2837 

of title 10, United States Code, shall not affect the validity or terms 

of any contract in connection with a limited partnership under subsection (a) or a collateral incentive agreement under subsection (b) 

of such section entered into before the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

(c) EFFECT ON DEFENSE HOUSING INVESTMENT ACCOUNT.—Any 

unobligated amounts remaining in the Defense Housing Investment 

Account on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be transferred 

to the Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund. 

Amounts transferred shall be merged with amounts in such fund 

and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the 

same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund. 

SEC. 2803. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS TO IMPROVE FORCE 

PROTECTION. 

(a) CONSIDERATION OF OTHER AVAILABLE SECURITY OR FORCE- PROTECTION MEASURES.—Section 2859(a)(2) of title 10, United 

States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘develop construction standards 

designed’’ and inserting ‘‘develop construction standards that, taking into consideration other security or force-protection measures 

available for the facility or military installation concerned, are designed’’. 

(b) REPORT ON CURRENT AND ADDITIONAL SECURITY SYSTEMS

AND TECHNOLOGIES.— (1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing and evaluating— 

(A) current expeditionary physical barrier systems; and 

(B) new systems or technologies that are being used for, 

or can be adopted for use for, force protection, including 

providing blast protection for forces supporting contingency 

operations. 

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by this subsection shall 

include the following: 

(A) A review of current and projected threats in connection with force protection, a description of any recent 

changes to policies on force protection, and an assessment 

of current planning methods on force protection, including 

standoff distances and physical barriers, to provide consistent and adequate levels of force protection. 

(B) An assessment of the use of expeditionary physical 

barrier systems to meet the goals of the combatant commands for force protection and force resiliency. 

(C) A description of the specifications developed by the 

Department of Defense to meet requirements for effectiveness, affordability, lifecycle management, and reuse or disposal of expeditionary physical barrier systems. 

(D) A description of the process used within the Department to ensure appropriate consideration of the decommisVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00375 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
344 

sioning cost, environmental impact, and subsequent disposal of expeditionary physical barrier materials in the procurement process for such materials. 

(E) An assessment of the availability of new technologies 

or designs that improve the capabilities or lifecycle costs of 

expeditionary physical barrier systems. 

(3) FORMS OF REPORT.—The report required by this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 

a classified annex. 

SEC. 2804. APPLICATION OF CASH PAYMENTS RECEIVED FOR UTILITIES AND SERVICES. 

Section 2872a(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘under paragraph (1) shall be’’ and all that 

follows through ‘‘was paid.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘under 

paragraph (1) as reimbursement for the cost of furnishing utilities or services shall— 

‘‘(A) in the case of a cost paid using funds appropriated or 

otherwise made available before October 1, 2014, be credited to 

the appropriation or working capital account from which the 

cost of furnishing utilities or services concerned was paid; or 

‘‘(B) in the case of a cost paid using funds appropriated or 

otherwise made available on or after October 1, 2014, be credited to the appropriation or working capital account currently 

available for the purpose of furnishing utilities or services 

under subsection (a).’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘Amounts so credited’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(3) Amounts credited under paragraph (2)’’. 

SEC. 2805. REPEAL OF ADVANCE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR 

USE OF MILITARY HOUSING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY. 

Section 2875 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (e). 

SEC. 2806. ADDITIONAL ELEMENT FOR ANNUAL REPORT ON MILITARY 

HOUSING PRIVATIZATION PROJECTS. 

Section 2884(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, to specifically 

include any unique variances associated with litigation costs’’. 

SEC. 2807. POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS REGARDING OVERSEAS 

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT OF UNITED STATES MILITARY INSTALLATIONS IN 

FOREIGN COUNTRIES. 

(a) OVERSEAS BASE CLOSURES AND REALIGNMENTS AND BASING

MASTER PLANS.—Section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘§ 2687a. Overseas base closures and realignments and basing master plans 

‘‘(a) ANNUAL REPORT ON STATUS OF OVERSEAS CLOSURES AND

REALIGNMENTS AND MASTER PLANS.—(1) At the same time that the 

budget is submitted under section 1105(a) of title 31 for a fiscal 

year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
345 

‘‘(A) the status of overseas base closure and realignment actions undertaken as part of a global defense posture realignment strategy; and 

‘‘(B) the status of development and execution of comprehensive 

master plans for overseas military main operating bases, forward operating sites, and cooperative security locations. 

‘‘(2) A report under paragraph (1) shall address the following: 

‘‘(A) How the master plans described in paragraph (1)(B) 

would support the security commitments undertaken by the 

United States pursuant to any international security treaty. 

‘‘(B) The impact of such plans on the current security environments in the combatant commands, including United States 

participation in theater security cooperation activities and bilateral partnership, exchanges, and training exercises. 

‘‘(C) Any comments of the Secretary of Defense resulting from 

an interagency review of these plans that includes the Department of State and other Federal departments and agencies that 

the Secretary of Defense considers necessary for national security. 

‘‘(b) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OVERSEAS MILITARY FACILITY IN- VESTMENT RECOVERY ACCOUNT.—(1) Except as provided in subsection (c), amounts paid to the United States, pursuant to any treaty, status of forces agreement, or other international agreement to 

which the United States is a party, for the residual value of real 

property or improvements to real property used by civilian or military personnel of the Department of Defense shall be deposited into 

the Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment 

Recovery Account. 

‘‘(2) Money deposited in the Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment Recovery Account shall be available to the 

Secretary of Defense for payment, as provided in appropriation Acts, 

of costs incurred by the Department of Defense in connection with— 

‘‘(A) military construction, facility maintenance and repair, 

and environmental restoration at military installations in the 

United States; and 

‘‘(B) military construction, facility maintenance and repair, 

and compliance with applicable environmental laws at military 

installations outside the United States at which the Secretary 

anticipates the United States will have an enduring presence. 

‘‘(3) Funds in the Department of Defense Overseas Facility Investment Recovery Account shall remain available until expended. 

‘‘(4) Not later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

detailing all expenditures made from the Department of Defense 

Overseas Facility Investment Recovery Account during the preceding 

fiscal year. 

‘‘(c) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS CORRESPONDING TO THE VALUE OF

PROPERTY PURCHASED WITH NONAPPROPRIATED FUNDS.—In the 

case of a payment referred to in subsection (b)(1) for the residual 

value of real property or improvements at an overseas military facility, the portion of the payment that is equal to the depreciated value 

of the investment made with nonappropriated funds shall be deposited in the reserve account established under section 204(b)(7)(C) of 

the Defense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and ReVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00377 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
346 

alignment Act (Public Law 100–526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). The Secretary of Defense may use amounts in the account (in such an aggregate amount as is provided in advance by appropriation Acts) for 

the purpose of acquiring, constructing, or improving commissary 

stores and nonappropriated fund instrumentalities. 

‘‘(d) OMB REVIEW OF PROPOSED OVERSEAS BASING SETTLE- MENTS.—(1) The Secretary of Defense may not enter into an agreement of settlement with a host country regarding the release to the 

host country of improvements made by the United States to facilities 

at an installation located in the host country until 30 days after the 

date on which the Secretary submits the proposed settlement to the 

Director of the Office of Management and Budget. The prohibition 

set forth in the preceding sentence shall apply only to agreements 

of settlement for improvements having a value in excess of 

$10,000,000. The Director shall evaluate the overall equity of the 

proposed settlement. In evaluating the proposed settlement, the Director shall consider such factors as the extent of the United States 

capital investment in the improvements being released to the host 

country, the depreciation of the improvements, the condition of the 

improvements, and any applicable requirements for environmental 

remediation or restoration at the installation. 

‘‘(2) Each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on each proposed agreement of settlement that 

was not submitted by the Secretary to the Director of the Office of 

Management and Budget in the previous year under paragraph (1) 

because the value of the improvements to be released pursuant to the 

proposed agreement did not exceed $10,000,000. 

‘‘(e) CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT OF USE OF PAYMENTS-IN-KIND

FOR CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATIONS.—(1) Before concluding an 

agreement for acceptance of military construction or facility improvements as a payment-in-kind, the Secretary of Defense shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees a notification on the 

proposed agreement. Any such notification shall contain the following: 

‘‘(A) A description of the military construction project or facility improvement project. 

‘‘(B) An explanation of the military requirement to be satisfied 

with the project. 

‘‘(C) A certification that the project is included in the current 

future-years defense program. 

‘‘(2) Before concluding an agreement for acceptance of host nation 

support or host nation payment of operating costs of United States 

forces as a payment-in-kind, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

to the congressional defense committees a notification on the proposed agreement. Any such notification shall contain the following: 

‘‘(A) A description of each activity to be covered by the payment-in-kind. 

‘‘(B) A certification that the costs to be covered by the payment-in-kind are included in the budget of one or more of the 

military departments or that it will otherwise be necessary to 

provide for payment of such costs in a budget of one or more 

of the military departments in the current or the next fiscal 

year. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
347 

‘‘(3) When the Secretary of Defense submits a notification of a proposed agreement under paragraph (1) or (2), the Secretary may then 

enter into the agreement described in the notification only after the 

end of the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the notification is submitted or, if earlier, the end of the 14-day period beginning on the date on which a copy of the notification is provided in 

an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title. 

‘‘(f) AUTHORIZED USE OF PAYMENTS-IN-KIND.—(1) A military construction project, as defined in chapter 159 of this title, may be accepted as a payment-in-kind contribution pursuant to a bilateral 

agreement with a host country only if that military construction 

project is authorized by law. 

‘‘(2) Operations of United States forces may be funded through a 

payment-in-kind contribution under this section only if the costs 

covered by such payment are included in the budget justification 

documents for the Department of Defense submitted to Congress in 

connection with the budget submitted under 1105 of title 31. 

‘‘(3) If funds previously appropriated for a military construction 

project, facility improvement, or operating costs are subsequently 

addressed in an agreement for a payment-in-kind contribution, the 

Secretary of Defense shall return to the Treasury funds in the 

amount equal to the value of the appropriated funds. 

‘‘(4) This subsection does not apply to a military construction 

project that— 

‘‘(A) was specified in a bilateral agreement with a host country that was entered into prior to the date of the enactment of 

the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2014; 

‘‘(B) was accepted as payment-in-kind for the residual value 

of improvements made by the United States at military installations released to the host country under section 2921 of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 

(division B of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) prior 

to the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014; or 

‘‘(C) subject to paragraph (5), will cost less than the cost specified in subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of this title for certain 

unspecified minor military construction projects. 

‘‘(5) In the case of a military construction project excluded pursuant to paragraph (4)(C) whose cost will exceed the cost specified in 

subsection (b) of section 2805 of this title for certain unspecified 

minor military construction projects, the congressional notification 

requirements and waiting period specified in paragraph (2) of such 

subsection shall apply. 

‘‘(g) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) The term ‘fair market value of the improvements’ means 

the value of improvements determined by the Secretary of Defense on the basis of their highest use. 

‘‘(2) The term ‘improvements’ includes new construction of facilities and all additions, improvements, modifications, or renovations made to existing facilities or to real property, without 

regard to whether they were carried out with appropriated or 

nonappropriated funds. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
348 

‘‘(3) The term ‘nonappropriated funds’ means funds received 

from— 

‘‘(A) the adjustment of, or surcharge on, selling prices at 

commissary stores fixed under section 2685 of this title; or 

‘‘(B) a nonappropriated fund instrumentality. 

‘‘(4) The term ‘nonappropriated fund instrumentality’ means 

an instrumentality of the United States under the jurisdiction 

of the armed forces (including the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, the Navy Resale and Services Support Office, 

and the Marine Corps exchanges) which is conducted for the 

comfort, pleasure, contentment, or physical or mental improvement of members of the armed forces.’’. 

(b) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED PROVISIONS RELATED TO OVERSEAS

BASE CLOSURES AND REALIGNMENTS .— 

(1) REPEAL; RETENTION OF SENSE OF CONGRESS.—Section 

2921 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘(a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—’’; and 

(B) by striking subsections (b) through (g). 

(2) TREATMENT OF SPECIAL ACCOUNT.—The repeal of subsection (c) of section 2921 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 1991 by paragraph (1)(B) shall not affect the 

Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment 

Recovery Account established by such subsection, amounts in 

such account, or the continued use of such account as provided 

in section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by 

subsection (a) of this section. 

(c) REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO PAYMENT-IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS

PURSUANT TO BILATERAL AGREEMENTS WITH HOST COUNTRIES.— 

Section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding 

at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d)(1) The requirement under subsection (a) that a military construction project must be authorized by law includes military construction projects funded through payment-in-kind contributions 

pursuant to a bilateral agreement with a host country. 

‘‘(2) The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary concerned shall include military construction projects covered under paragraph (1) in 

the budget justification documents for the Department of Defense 

submitted to Congress in connection with the budget for a fiscal 

year submitted under 1105 of title 31. 

‘‘(3) This subsection does not apply to a military construction 

project that— 

‘‘(A) was specified in a bilateral agreement with a host country that was entered into prior to the date of the enactment of 

the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2014; 

‘‘(B) was accepted as payment-in-kind for the residual value 

of improvements made by the United States at military installations released to the host country under section 2921 of the 

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 

(division B of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) prior 

to the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014; or 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
349 

‘‘(C) will cost less than the cost specified in subsection (a)(2) 

of section 2805 of this title for certain unspecified minor military construction projects. 

‘‘(4) In the case of a military construction project excluded pursuant to paragraph (3)(C) whose cost will exceed the cost specified in 

subsection (b) of section 2805 of this title for certain unspecified 

minor military construction projects, the congressional notification 

requirements and waiting period specified in paragraph (2) of such 

subsection shall apply.’’. 

SEC. 2808. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF TEMPORARY, LIMITED 

AUTHORITY TO USE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN CERTAIN 

AREAS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. 

Section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 

1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of 

Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2149), is further amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and all that 

follows through ‘‘conditions:’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary of 

Defense may obligate appropriated funds available for operation and maintenance to carry out, inside the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command or certain countries in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa 

Command, a construction project that the Secretary determines 

meets each of the following conditions:’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘shall not exceed’’ and all 

that follows through the period at the end and inserting ‘‘shall 

not exceed $100,000,000 between October 1, 2013, and the earlier of December 31, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an 

Act authorizing funds for military activities of the Department 

of Defense for fiscal year 2015.’’; 

(3) in subsection (h)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2013’’ 

and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2014’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2014’’ and 

inserting ‘‘fiscal year 2015’’; and 

(4) by striking subsection (i) and inserting the following new 

subsection: 

‘‘(i) CERTAIN COUNTRIES IN THE AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY OF

UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘certain countries in the area of responsibility of the United 

States Africa Command’ means Kenya, Somalia, Ethiopia, Djibouti, 

Seychelles, Burundi, and Uganda.’’. 

SEC. 2809. LIMITATION ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN EUROPEAN 

COMMAND AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subjection (b), the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department shall not 

award any contract in connection with a construction project authorized by this division to be carried out at an installation operated in the European Command area of responsibility until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees 

that— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
350 

(1) the installation and specific military construction requirement— 

(A) have been assessed as part of the basing assessment 

initiated by the Secretary of Defense on January 25, 2013 

(known as the ‘‘European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment’’); and 

(B) have been determined, pursuant to such assessment, 

to be of an enduring nature; and 

(2) the specific military construction requirement most effectively meets combatant commander requirements at the authorized location. 

(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to a 

construction project that— 

(1) is authorized by law before the date of the enactment of 

this Act; 

(2) is carried out at an installation located in Greenland; 

(3) is funded through the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

Security Investment Program or intended to specifically support 

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; or 

(4) is carried out under the authority of, and subject to the 

limits specified in, section 2805 of title 10, United States Code. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities 

Administration 

SEC. 2811. DEVELOPMENT OF MASTER PLANS FOR MAJOR MILITARY 

INSTALLATIONS. 

Section 2864 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘At a time’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) At a time’’; 

and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) To address the requirements under paragraph (1), each installation master plan shall include consideration of— 

‘‘(A) planning for compact and infill development; 

‘‘(B) horizontal and vertical mixed-use development; 

‘‘(C) the full lifecycle costs of real property planning decisions; 

and 

‘‘(D) capacity planning through the establishment of growth 

boundaries around cantonment areas to focus development towards the core and preserve range and training space.’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The transportation’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) 

The transportation’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(2) To address the requirements under subsection (a) and paragraph (1), each installation master plan shall include consideration 

of ways to diversify and connect transit systems.’’; 

(3) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and 

(4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: 

‘‘(c) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this section shall supersede the 

requirements of section 2859(a) of this title.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
351 

SEC. 2812. AUTHORITY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS TO COVER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ASSOCIATED WITH REAL PROPERTY 

LEASES AND EASEMENTS. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (e)(1)(C) of section 2667 of title 10, 

United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following 

new clause: 

‘‘(vi) Administrative expenses incurred by the Secretary concerned under this section and for easements under section 2668 

of this title.’’. 

(b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES DEFINED.—Subsection (i) of such 

section is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the 

following new paragraph (1): 

‘‘(1) The term ‘administrative expenses’ means only those expenses related to assessing, negotiating, executing, and managing lease and easement transactions. The term does not include any Government personnel costs.’’. 

SEC. 2813. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LONG-TERM 

CONTRACTS FOR RECEIPT OF UTILITY SERVICES AS CONSIDERATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS CONVEYANCES. 

Section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The determination 

of cost effectiveness shall be made using a business case analysis 

that includes an independent estimate of the level of investment that 

should be required to maintain adequate operation of the utility system over the proposed term of the contract.’’. 

SEC. 2814. REPORT ON EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE REAL PROPERTY. 

(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to 

Congress a report on the efficient utilization of real property across 

the Department of Defense. 

(b) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by subsection (a) 

shall describe the following: 

(1) The strategy of the Department of Defense for maximizing 

efficient utilization of existing facilities, progress implementing 

this strategy, and obstacles to implementing this strategy. 

(2) The efforts of the Department of Defense to systematically 

collect, process, and analyze data on the efficient utilization of 

real property to aid in the planning and implementation of the 

strategy referred to in paragraph (1). 

(3) The number of underutilized Department facilities, to be 

defined as facilities rated less than 66 percent utilization, and 

unutilized Department facilities, to be defined as facilities rated 

at zero percent utilization, in the Real Property Inventory Database of the Department of Defense. 

(4) The annual cost of maintaining and improving such underutilized and unutilized Department facilities. 

(5) The efforts of the Department of Defense to dispose of underutilized and unutilized facilities. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
352 

(c) CLASSIFIED ANNEX.—The report required by subsection (a) 

may include a classified annex if necessary to fully describe the 

matters required by subsection (b). 

SEC. 2815. CONDITIONS ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXPANSION OF 

PIN ̃ ON CANYON MANEUVER SITE, FORT CARSON, COLORADO. 

The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not 

acquire, by purchase, condemnation, or other means, any land to expand the size of the Pin ̃ on Canyon Maneuver Site near Fort Carson, 

Colorado, unless each of the following occurs: 

(1) The land acquisition is specifically authorized in an Act 

of Congress enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(2) Funds are specifically appropriated for the land acquisition. 

(3) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army 

comply with the environmental review requirements of section 

102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4332(2)) with respect to the land acquisition. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Related to AsiaPacific Military Realignment 

SEC. 2821. CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR TO PREVIOUS 

FISCAL YEAR FOR PERIOD COVERED BY ANNUAL REPORT 

OF INTERAGENCY COORDINATION GROUP OF INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR GUAM REALIGNMENT. 

Section 2835(e)(1) of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is 

amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘calendar year’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year’’. 

SEC. 2822. REALIGNMENT OF MARINES CORPS FORCES IN ASIA-PACIFIC REGION. 

(a) RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated under 

this Act, and none of the amounts provided by the Government of 

Japan for construction activities on land under the jurisdiction of 

the Department of Defense, may be obligated to implement the realignment of Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam or Hawaii until the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following: 

(1) The report required by section 1068(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239; 126 Stat. 1945). 

(2) Master plans for the construction of facilities and infrastructure to execute the Marine Corps distributed lay-down on 

Guam and Hawaii, including a detailed description of costs 

and the schedule for such construction. 

(3) A plan, coordinated by all pertinent Federal agencies, detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a schedule for completion of construction, improvements, and repairs to the non-military utilities, facilities, and infrastructure, if any, on Guam affected by the realignment of forces. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
353 

(b) EXCEPTIONS TO RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may use funds described in such subsection for the following purposes: 

(1) To complete additional analysis or studies required under 

the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 

et seq.) for proposed actions on Guam or Hawaii. 

(2) To initiate planning and design of construction projects on 

Guam. 

(3) To carry out any military construction project for which 

an authorization of appropriations is provided in section 2204, 

as specified in the funding table in section 4601. 

(4) To carry out the construction of a utility and site improvement project to support the North Ramp expansion at Andersen 

Air Force Base. 

(c) RESTRICTION ON DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, or 

supplement of funds available in fiscal year 2014 under Federal 

programs administered by agencies other than the Department of 

Defense will result in the development (including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, 

or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary of 

Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding is specifically authorized 

by law. 

(d) ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF ADDI- TIONAL GUAM PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING SOURCES.— (1) CONVENING OF COMMITTEE.—Not later than 90 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, 

as the chairperson of the Economic Adjustment Committee established in Executive Order No. 127887 (10 U.S.C. 2391 note), 

shall convene the Economic Adjustment Committee to consider 

assistance, including assistance to support public infrastructure 

requirements, necessary to support the preferred alternative for 

the relocation of Marine Corps forces to Guam. 

(2) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than the date on which the 

Record of Decision for the relocation of Marine Corps forces to 

Guam associated with the ‘‘Guam and CNMI Military Relocation (2012 Roadmap Adjustments) Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement’’ is issued, the Secretary of Defense 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report— 

(A) describing the results of the Economic Adjustment 

Committee deliberations required by paragraph (1); and 

(B) containing an implementation plan to support the 

preferred alternative for the relocation of Marine Corps 

forces to Guam. 

(e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) DISTRIBUTED LAY-DOWN.—The term ‘‘distributed laydown’’ refers to the planned distribution of members of the Marine Corps in Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii, Australia, and possibly 

elsewhere that is contemplated in support of the joint statement 

of the United States–Japan Security Consultative Committee 

issued April 26, 2012, in the District of Columbia (April 27, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
354 

2012, in Tokyo, Japan) and revised on October 3, 2013, in 

Tokyo. 

(2) MASTER PLAN.—The term ‘‘master plan’’ means documentation that provides the scope, cost, and schedule for each 

military construction project. 

(3) PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.—The term ‘‘public infrastructure’’ means any utility, method of transportation, item of 

equipment, or facility under the control of a public entity or 

State or local government that is used by, or constructed for the 

benefit of, the general public. 

(f) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED LAW.—Section 2832 of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of 

Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2155) is repealed. 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances 

SEC. 2831. REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION, NAVAL BASE VENTURA 

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 

(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Navy may acquire all right, 

title, and interest in and to real property, including improvements 

thereon, located at Naval Base Ventura County, California, that 

was initially constructed under the former section 2828(g) of title 

10, United States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Build to Lease 

program’’), as added by section 801 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984 (Public Law 98–115; 97 Stat 782). 

(b) USE.—Upon acquiring the real property under subsection (a), 

the Secretary of the Navy may use the improvements as provided in 

sections 2835 and 2835a of title 10, United States Code. 

SEC. 2832. LAND CONVEYANCE, FORMER OXNARD AIR FORCE BASE, 

VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may 

convey, without consideration, to Ventura County, California (in 

this section referred to as the ‘‘County’’), all right, title, and interest 

of the United States in and to the real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of former Oxnard Air Force Base for 

the purpose of permitting the County to use the property for public 

purposes. 

(b) CONDITION ON USE OF REVENUES.—If the property conveyed 

under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such subsection, for a 

public purpose that results in the generation of revenue for the 

County, the County shall agree to use the generated revenue only for 

airport purposes by depositing the revenues in an airport fund designated for airport use. 

(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Navy shall require the County to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, 

or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and 

any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If 

amounts are collected from the County in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
355 

the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to 

the County. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as 

reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 

fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by 

the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, 

and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the 

same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or 

account. 

(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall 

be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy. 

(e) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If the Secretary of the Navy determines at any time that the real property conveyed under subsection 

(a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a) or that the County has violated the 

condition on the use of revenues imposed by subsection (b), all right, 

title, and interest in and to such real property, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to 

and become the property of the United States, and the United States 

shall have the right of immediate entry onto such real property. A 

determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be made 

on the record after an opportunity for a hearing. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary of the Navy may require 

such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests 

of the United States. 

SEC. 2833. LAND CONVEYANCE, JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, 

HAWAII. 

(a) CONVEYANCES AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may 

convey to the Hale Keiki School all right, title, and interest of the 

United States, or any portion thereof, in and to certain real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 11 acres located at or in the nearby vicinity of 153 Bougainville Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii (City and County of Honolulu Tax 

Map Key No. 9–9–02:37), which is part of the Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, before such real property, or any portion thereof, is 

made available for transfer pursuant to the Hawaiian Home Lands 

Recovery Act (title II of Public Law 104–42; 109 Stat. 357), for use 

by any other Federal agency, or for disposal under applicable laws. 

(b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for a conveyance under 

subsection (a), the Hale Keiki School shall provide the United 

States, whether by cash payment, in-kind consideration described in 

section 2667(c) of title 10, United States Code, or a combination 

thereof, an amount that is not less than the fair market value of the 

conveyed property, as determined pursuant to an appraisal acceptable to the Secretary. 

(c) EXERCISE OF RIGHT TO PURCHASE PROPERTY.— 

(1) ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER.—For a period of 180 days beginning on the date the Secretary makes a written offer to convey 

the property or any portion thereof under subsection (a), the 

Hale Keiki School shall have the exclusive right to accept such 

offer by providing written notice of acceptance to the Secretary 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
356 

within the specified 180-day time period. If the Secretary’s offer 

is not so accepted within the 180-day period, the offer shall expire. 

(2) CONVEYANCE DEADLINE.—If the Hale Keiki School accepts 

the offer to convey the property or a portion thereof in accordance with paragraph (1), the conveyance shall take place not 

later than two years after the date of the Hale Keiki School’s 

written acceptance. The Secretary and the Hale Keiki School, by 

mutual agreement, may extend the two-year conveyance deadline for a reasonable period of time, as evidenced by a new lease 

or license executed by the parties before the deadline. 

(d) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCES.— (1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall require the 

Hale Keiki School to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, 

or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out a conveyance under subsection (a), including 

survey costs, related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected 

from the Hale Keiki School in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs 

actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, 

the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Hale Keiki 

School. The Secretary may collect the costs from the Hale Keiki 

School in advance of incurring any costs and may pay the administrative costs of processing the conveyance as they are incurred or at any time thereafter. 

(2) ASSUMPTION OF RISK OF PAYING COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

In the event that the conveyance is not completed by the deadline set forth in subsection (c)(2), including any extension thereof, the amounts collected from the Hale Keiki School under 

paragraph (1) will not be refunded or reimbursed. The Hale 

Keiki School shall be considered to have assumed the risk of 

paying all costs of processing the conveyance after the offer has 

been accepted by the Hale Keiki School, regardless of whether 

or not the conveyance is ever completed. 

(3) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received 

under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the 

Secretary to carry out a conveyance under subsection (a) shall 

be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the 

costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. 

Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such 

fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, 

and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 

in such fund or account. 

(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal description of any real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 

shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERM AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with a 

conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

SEC. 2834. LAND CONVEYANCE, PHILADELPHIA NAVAL SHIPYARD, 

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may 

convey to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority (in this section 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
357 

referred to as the ‘‘Port Authority’’) all right, title, and interest of the 

United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately .595 acres located 

at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 

The Secretary may void any land use restrictions associated with 

the property to be conveyed under this subsection. 

(b) CONSIDERATION.— (1) AMOUNT AND DETERMINATION.—As consideration for the 

conveyance under subsection (a), the Port Authority shall pay to 

the Secretary of the Navy an amount that is not less than the 

fair market value of the property conveyed, as determined by 

the Secretary. The Secretary’s determination of fair market 

value shall be final. In lieu of all or a portion of cash payment 

of consideration, the Secretary may accept in-kind consideration. 

(2) TREATMENT OF CASH CONSIDERATION.—The Secretary 

shall deposit any cash payment received under paragraph (1) in 

the special account in the Treasury established for that Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10, United 

States Code. The entire amount deposited shall be available for 

use in accordance with paragraph (1)(D) of such subsection. 

(c) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— (1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Navy shall require the Port Authority to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the 

Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs 

actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, 

the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Port Authority. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as 

reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 

fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by 

the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and 

shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the 

same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or 

account. 

(d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal description of the parcel of real property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy. 

(e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary of the 

Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

SEC. 2835. LAND CONVEYANCE, CAMP WILLIAMS, UTAH. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Land Management, may convey, without 

consideration, to the State of Utah all right, title, and interest of the 

United States in and to certain lands comprising approximately 420 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
358 

acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘‘Proposed Camp Williams Land Transfer’’ and dated June 14, 2011, which are located 

within the boundaries of the public lands currently withdrawn for 

military use by the Utah National Guard and known as Camp Williams, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the Utah National Guard 

to use the conveyed land for military purposes. 

(b) SUPERSEDENCE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER.—Executive Order No. 

1922 of April 24, 1914, as amended by section 907 of the Camp 

W.G. Williams Land Exchange Act of 1989 (title IX of Public Law 

101–628; 104 Stat. 4501), is hereby superseded, only insofar as it affects the lands conveyed to the State of Utah under subsection (a). 

(c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If the Secretary of the Army, in 

consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, determines at any 

time that the lands conveyed under subsection (a), or any portion 

thereof, are sold or attempted to be sold, or that the lands, or any 

portion thereof, are not being used in a manner consistent with the 

purpose of the conveyance specified in such subsection, all right, 

title, and interest in and to the lands shall, at the option of the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the 

United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto the 

lands. A determination under this subsection shall be made on the 

record after an opportunity for a hearing. 

(d) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 

under subsection (a) as the Secretary of the Interior considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

SEC. 2836. CONVEYANCE, AIR NATIONAL GUARD RADAR SITE, FRANCIS 

PEAK, WASATCH MOUNTAINS, UTAH. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Air Force 

may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah (in this section referred to as the ‘‘State’’), all right, title, and interest of the 

United States in and to the structures, including equipment and 

any other personal property related thereto, comprising the Air National Guard radar site located on Francis Peak, Utah, for the purpose of permitting the State to use the structures to support emergency public safety communications, including 911 emergency response service for Northern Utah. 

(b) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force may 

require the State to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, 

or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, 

and other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If 

amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the 

Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the State. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as 

reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 

fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the 

Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited 

shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
359 

shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the 

same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or 

account. 

(c) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact inventory of equipment 

and other personal property to be conveyed under subsection (a) 

shall be determined by the Secretary of the Air Force. 

(d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Secretary of the 

Air Force may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary 

considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

(e) CONTINUATION OF LAND USE PERMIT.—The conveyance of the 

structures under subsection (a) shall not affect the validity and continued applicability of the land use permit, in effect on the date of 

the enactment of this Act, that was issued by the Forest Service for 

placement and use of the structures. 

(f) DURATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority to make a conveyance under this section shall expire on the later of— 

(1) September 30, 2014; or 

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for 

military construction for fiscal year 2015. 

SEC. 2837. LAND CONVEYANCES, FORMER UNITED STATES ARMY RESERVE CENTERS, CONNECTICUT, NEW HAMPSHIRE, AND 

PENNSYLVANIA. 

(a) CONVEYANCES AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Army may 

convey, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the 

United States in and to the parcels of real property described in 

paragraphs (1) through (4), including any improvements thereon 

and easements related thereto, to the entity specified in such a paragraph for the corresponding parcel and for the purposes specified in 

such paragraph: 

(1) Approximately 5.11 acres and improvements known as the 

LT John S. Turner Army Reserve Center in Fairfield, Connecticut, to the City of Fairfield, Connecticut, for the public benefit of a public park or recreational use. 

(2) Approximately 6.9 acres and improvements known as the 

Paul J. Sutcovoy Army Reserve Center in Waterbury, Connecticut, to the City of Waterbury, Connecticut, for the public 

benefit of emergency services and public safety activities. 

(3) Approximately 3.4 acres and improvements known as the 

Paul A. Doble Army Reserve Center in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, to the City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, for the public 

benefit of a public park or recreational use. 

(4) Approximately 4.52 acres and containing the Mifflin 

County Army Reserve Center located at 73 Reserve Lane, 

Lewistown, Pennsylvania (parcel number 16,01–0113J) to Derry 

Township, Pennsylvania for a regional police headquarters or 

other purposes of public benefit. 

(b) TERMS APPLICABLE TO MIFFLIN COUNTY ARMY RESERVE CENTER CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) INTERIM LEASE.—Until such time as the real property described in subsection (a)(4) is conveyed to Derry Township, 

Pennsylvania, the Secretary of the Army may lease the property 

to the Township. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
360 

(2) CONDITIONS OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance of the real 

property under subsection (a)(4) shall be subject to the condition 

that Derry Township, Pennsylvania, not use any Federal funds 

to cover— 

(A) any portion of the conveyance costs required by subsection (d) to be paid by the Township; or 

(B) to cover the costs for the design or construction of any 

facility on the property. 

(c) REVERSION; EXCEPTION.— 

(1) REVERSION.—The deed of conveyance for a parcel of real 

property conveyed under this section shall provide that all of 

the property be used and maintained for the purpose for which 

it was conveyed, as specified in subsection (a). If the Secretary 

of the Army determines at any time that the real property is no 

longer used or maintained in accordance with the purpose of 

the conveyance, all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall revert, at the option of the Secretary, to the United 

States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate 

entry onto the property. Any determination of the Secretary 

under this paragraph shall be made on the record after an opportunity for hearing. 

(2) PAYMENT OF CONSIDERATION IN LIEU OF REVERSION.—In 

lieu of exercising the right of reversion retained under paragraph (1) with respect to a parcel of real property conveyed 

under this section, the Secretary may require the recipient of the 

property to pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair 

market value of the property conveyed. The fair market value of 

the property shall be determined by the Secretary. 

(3) TREATMENT OF CASH CONSIDERATION.—Any cash payment 

received by the United States under paragraph (2) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established under 

subsection (b) of section 572 of title 40, United States Code, and 

shall be available in accordance with paragraph (5)(B) of such 

subsection. 

(d) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall require the recipient of a parcel of real property conveyed under 

this section to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to 

reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance of the property, including 

survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any 

other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts 

are collected from the recipient of the property in advance of the 

Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected 

exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out 

the conveyance of the property, the Secretary shall refund the 

excess amount to the recipient of the property. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as 

reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 

fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by 

the Secretary in carrying out the conveyances under this section. 

Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such 

fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
361 

and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts 

in such fund or account. 

(e) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES.—The exact acreage and legal description of a parcel of real property to be conveyed under this section shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of 

the Army. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS.—The Secretary of the Army may require 

such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance of a parcel of real property under this section as the Secretary 

considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

SEC. 2841. REPEAL OF ANNUAL ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE 

REPORTING REQUIREMENT. 

Subsection (d) of section 4004 of the Defense Economic Adjustment, Diversification, Conversion, and Stabilization Act of 1990 (division D of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2391 note), as amended 

by section 4212(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 106 Stat. 2664), is further 

amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (1); 

(2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting a period; and 

(3) by striking paragraph (3). 

SEC. 2842. ESTABLISHMENT OF MILITARY DIVERS MEMORIAL. 

(a) MEMORIAL AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Navy may permit a third party to establish and maintain a memorial to honor 

the members of the United States Armed Forces who have served as 

divers and whose service in defense of the United States has been 

carried out beneath the waters of the world. 

(b) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROHIBITED.—Federal funds may not 

be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the memorial authorized by subsection (a), but the Secretary may accept and 

expend contributions of non-Federal funds and resources for such 

purposes. 

(c) LOCATION OF MEMORIAL.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Consistent with the sense of the Congress 

expressed in section 2855 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2162), 

the Secretary may permit the memorial authorized by subsection (a) to be established— 

(A) at a suitable location at the former Navy Dive School 

at the Washington Navy Yard in the District of Columbia; 

or 

(B) at another suitable location under the jurisdiction of 

the Secretary. 

(2) CONDITION.—The memorial authorized by subsection (a) 

may not be established at any location under the jurisdiction of 

the Secretary until the Secretary determines that an assured 

source of non-Federal funding has been established for the design, procurement, installation, and maintenance of the memorial. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
362 

(d) DESIGN OF MEMORIAL.—The final design of the memorial authorized by subsection (a) shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary. 

TITLE XXIX—WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF PUBLIC 

LANDS TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY 

Sec. 2901. Short title. 

Sec. 2902. Definitions. 

Subtitle A—General Provisions 

Sec. 2911. General applicability; definitions. 

Sec. 2912. Maps and legal descriptions. 

Sec. 2913. Access restrictions. 

Sec. 2914. Changes in use. 

Sec. 2915. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression. 

Sec. 2916. Ongoing decontamination. 

Sec. 2917. Water rights. 

Sec. 2918. Hunting, fishing, and trapping. 

Sec. 2919. Limitation on extensions and renewals. 

Sec. 2920. Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation. 

Sec. 2921. Limitation on subsequent availability of land for appropriation. 

Sec. 2922. Relinquishment. 

Sec. 2923. Immunity of the United States. 

Subtitle B—Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana 

Sec. 2931. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2932. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2933. Special rules governing minerals management. 

Sec. 2934. Grazing. 

Sec. 2935. Payments in lieu of taxes. 

Sec. 2936. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

Subtitle C—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California 

Sec. 2941. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2942. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2943. Public access. 

Sec. 2944. Resource management group. 

Sec. 2945. Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area. 

Sec. 2946. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

Subtitle D—White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas 

Sec. 2951. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2952. Grazing. 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California 

Sec. 2961. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land. 

Sec. 2962. Management and use of transferred land. 

Sec. 2963. Effect of termination of military use. 

Sec. 2964. Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period. 

Sec. 2965. Water rights. 

Sec. 2966. Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title. 

Subtitle F—Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California 

Sec. 2971. Withdrawal and reservation of public land. 

Sec. 2972. Management of withdrawn and reserved land. 

Sec. 2973. Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the Navy. 

Sec. 2974. Geothermal resources. 

Sec. 2975. Wild horses and burros. 

Sec. 2976. Continuation of existing agreement. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
363 

Sec. 2977. Management plans. 

Sec. 2978. Termination of prior withdrawals. 

Sec. 2979. Duration of withdrawal and reservation. 

SEC. 2901. SHORT TITLE. 

This title may be cited as the ‘‘Military Land Withdrawals Act of 

2013’’. 

SEC. 2902. DEFINITIONS. 

In this title: 

(1) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ has the meaning 

given the term in section 102 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a). 

(2) MANAGE; MANAGEMENT.— (A) INCLUSIONS.—The terms ‘‘manage’’ and ‘‘management’’ include the authority to exercise jurisdiction, custody, 

and control over the land withdrawn and reserved by this 

title. 

(B) EXCLUSIONS.—The terms ‘‘manage’’ and ‘‘management’’ do not include authority for disposal of the land 

withdrawn and reserved by this title. 

(3) SECRETARY CONCERNED.—The term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ 

has the meaning given the term in section 101(a) of title 10, 

United States Code. 

Subtitle A—General Provisions 

SEC. 2911. GENERAL APPLICABILITY; DEFINITIONS. 

(a) APPLICABILITY.—This subtitle applies to each land withdrawal 

and reservation made by this title. 

(b) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this title assigns management of real property under the administrative jurisdiction of the 

Secretary concerned to the Secretary of the Interior. 

SEC. 2912. MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS. 

(a) PREPARATION OF MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.—As soon as 

practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

the Interior shall— 

(1) publish in the Federal Register a notice containing the 

legal descriptions of the land withdrawn and reserved by this 

title; and 

(2) file maps and legal descriptions of the land withdrawn 

and reserved by this title with— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives. 

(b) LEGAL EFFECT.—The maps and legal descriptions filed under 

subsection (a)(2) shall have the same force and effect as if the maps 

and legal descriptions were included in this title, except that the 

Secretary of the Interior may correct any clerical and typographical 

errors in the maps and legal descriptions. 

(c) AVAILABILITY.—Copies of the maps and legal descriptions filed 

under subsection (a)(2) shall be available for public inspection— 

(1) in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
364 

(2) in the office of the commanding officer of the military installation for which the land is withdrawn; and 

(3) if the military installation is under the management of the 

National Guard, in the office of the Adjutant General of the 

State in which the military installation is located. 

(d) COSTS.—The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for the costs incurred by the Secretary of the 

Interior in implementing this section. 

SEC. 2913. ACCESS RESTRICTIONS. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS.—If the Secretary concerned determines that military operations, public safety, or national security require the closure to the public of any road, trail, 

or other portion of land withdrawn and reserved by this title, the 

Secretary may take such action as the Secretary determines to be 

necessary to implement and maintain the closure. 

(b) LIMITATION.—Any closure under subsection (a) shall be limited 

to the minimum area and duration that the Secretary concerned determines are required for the purposes of the closure. 

(c) CONSULTATION REQUIRED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), before a closure is 

implemented under this section, the Secretary concerned shall 

consult with the Secretary of the Interior. 

(2) INDIAN TRIBE.—Subject to paragraph (3), if a closure proposed under this section may affect access to or use of sacred 

sites or resources considered to be important by an Indian tribe, 

the Secretary concerned shall consult, at the earliest practicable 

date, with the affected Indian tribe. 

(3) LIMITATION.—No consultation shall be required under 

paragraph (1) or (2)— 

(A) if the closure is provided for in an integrated natural 

resources management plan, an installation cultural resources management plan, or a land use management plan; 

or 

(B) in the case of an emergency, as determined by the 

Secretary concerned. 

(d) NOTICE.—Immediately preceding and during any closure implemented under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall post 

appropriate warning notices and take other appropriate actions to 

notify the public of the closure. 

SEC. 2914. CHANGES IN USE. 

(a) OTHER USES AUTHORIZED.—In addition to the purposes described in a subtitle of this title applicable to the land withdrawal 

and reservation made by that subtitle, the Secretary concerned may 

authorize the use of land withdrawn and reserved by this title for 

defense-related purposes. 

(b) NOTICE TO SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary concerned shall promptly notify the Secretary of the Interior if the land withdrawn and reserved by this title is used for additional defense-related purposes. 

(2) REQUIREMENTS.—A notification under paragraph (1) shall 

specify— 

(A) each additional use; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
365 

(B) the planned duration of each additional use; and 

(C) the extent to which each additional use would require 

that additional or more stringent conditions or restrictions 

be imposed on otherwise-permitted nondefense-related uses 

of the withdrawn and reserved land or portions of withdrawn and reserved land. 

SEC. 2915. BRUSH AND RANGE FIRE PREVENTION AND SUPPRESSION. 

(a) REQUIRED ACTIVITIES.—Consistent with any applicable land 

management plan, the Secretary concerned shall take necessary precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range fires 

occurring as a result of military activities on the land withdrawn 

and reserved by this title, including fires that occur on other land 

that spread from the withdrawn and reserved land. 

(b) COOPERATION OF SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—At the request of the Secretary concerned, 

the Secretary of the Interior shall provide assistance in the suppression of fires under subsection (a). The Secretary concerned 

shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for the costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior in providing such assistance. 

(2) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Notwithstanding section 2215 of 

title 10, United States Code, the Secretary concerned may transfer to the Secretary of the Interior, in advance, funds to be used 

to reimburse the costs of the Department of the Interior in providing assistance under this subsection. 

SEC. 2916. ONGOING DECONTAMINATION. 

(a) PROGRAM OF DECONTAMINATION REQUIRED.—During the period of a withdrawal and reservation of land under this title, the 

Secretary concerned shall maintain, to the extent funds are available to carry out this subsection, a program of decontamination of 

contamination caused by defense-related uses on the withdrawn 

land. The decontamination program shall be carried out consistent 

with applicable Federal and State law. 

(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall include in 

the annual report required by section 2711 of title 10, United States 

Code, a description of decontamination activities conducted under 

subsection (a). 

SEC. 2917. WATER RIGHTS. 

(a) NO RESERVATION OF WATER RIGHTS.—Nothing in this title— 

(1) establishes a reservation in favor of the United States 

with respect to any water or water right on the land withdrawn 

and reserved by this title; or 

(2) authorizes the appropriation of water on the land withdrawn and reserved by this title, except in accordance with applicable State law. 

(b) EFFECT ON PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED OR RESERVED WATER

RIGHTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section affects any water 

rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date 

of enactment of this Act on the land withdrawn and reserved 

by this title. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
366 

(2) AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY CONCERNED.—The Secretary 

concerned may exercise any water rights described in paragraph (1). 

SEC. 2918. HUNTING, FISHING, AND TRAPPING. 

Section 2671 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply to all 

hunting, fishing, and trapping on the land— 

(1) that is withdrawn and reserved by this title; and 

(2) for which management of the land has been assigned to 

the Secretary concerned. 

SEC. 2919. LIMITATION ON EXTENSIONS AND RENEWALS. 

The withdrawals and reservations established under this title 

may not be extended or renewed except by a law enacted after the 

date of enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 2920. APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF A WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 

To the extent practicable, not later than five years before the date 

of termination of a withdrawal and reservation made by a subtitle 

of this title, the Secretary concerned shall— 

(1) notify the Secretary of the Interior as to whether the Secretary concerned will have a continuing defense-related need for 

any of the land withdrawn and reserved by that subtitle after 

the termination date of the withdrawal and reservation; and 

(2) transmit a copy of the notice submitted under paragraph 

(1) to— 

(A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; and 

(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee 

on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives. 

SEC. 2921. LIMITATION ON SUBSEQUENT AVAILABILITY OF LAND FOR 

APPROPRIATION. 

On the termination of a withdrawal and reservation made by this 

title, the previously withdrawn land shall not be open to any form 

of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining 

laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws, 

unless the Secretary of the Interior publishes in the Federal Register 

an appropriate order specifying the date on which the land shall 

be— 

(1) restored to the public domain; and 

(2) opened for appropriation under the public land laws. 

SEC. 2922. RELINQUISHMENT. 

(a) NOTICE OF INTENTION TO RELINQUISH.—If, during the period 

of withdrawal and reservation made by a subtitle of this title, the 

Secretary concerned decides to relinquish any or all of the land 

withdrawn and reserved by that subtitle, the Secretary concerned 

shall submit to the Secretary of the Interior notice of the intention 

to relinquish the land. 

(b) DETERMINATION OF CONTAMINATION.—The Secretary concerned shall include in the notice submitted under subsection (a) a 

written determination concerning whether and to what extent the 

land that is to be relinquished is contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous substances. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
367 

(c) PUBLIC NOTICE.—The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in 

the Federal Register the notice of intention to relinquish the land 

under this section, including the determination concerning the contaminated state of the land. 

(d) DECONTAMINATION OF LAND TO BE RELINQUISHED.— 

(1) DECONTAMINATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary concerned 

shall decontaminate land subject to a notice of intention under 

subsection (a) to the extent that funds are appropriated for that 

purpose, if— 

(A) the land subject to the notice of intention is contaminated, as determined by the Secretary concerned; and 

(B) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the 

Secretary concerned, determines that— 

(i) decontamination is practicable and economically 

feasible, after taking into consideration the potential 

future use and value of the contaminated land; and 

(ii) on decontamination of the land, the land could 

be opened to operation of some or all of the public land 

laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing 

laws, and the geothermal leasing laws. 

(2) ALTERNATIVES TO RELINQUISHMENT.—The Secretary of the 

Interior shall not be required to accept the land proposed for relinquishment under subsection (a), if— 

(A) the Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with 

the Secretary concerned, determines that— 

(i) decontamination of the land is not practicable or 

economically feasible; or 

(ii) the land cannot be decontaminated sufficiently to 

be opened to operation of some or all of the public land 

laws; or 

(B) sufficient funds are not appropriated for the decontamination of the land. 

(3) STATUS OF CONTAMINATED LAND ON TERMINATION.—If, because of the contaminated state of the land, the Secretary of the 

Interior declines to accept land withdrawn and reserved by this 

title that has been proposed for relinquishment, or if at the expiration of the withdrawal and reservation, the Secretary of the 

Interior determines that a portion of the land withdrawn and 

reserved is contaminated to an extent that prevents opening the 

contaminated land to operation of the public land laws— 

(A) the Secretary concerned shall take appropriate steps 

to warn the public of— 

(i) the contaminated state of the land; and 

(ii) any risks associated with entry onto the land; 

(B) after the expiration of the withdrawal and reservation, the Secretary concerned shall undertake no activities 

on the contaminated land, except for activities relating to 

the decontamination of the land; and 

(C) the Secretary concerned shall submit to the Secretary 

of the Interior and Congress a report describing— 

(i) the status of the land; and 

(ii) any actions taken under this paragraph. 

(e) REVOCATION AUTHORITY.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
368 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of the Interior determines 

that it is in the public interest to accept the land proposed for 

relinquishment under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior may order the revocation of a withdrawal and reservation 

made by this title. 

(2) REVOCATION ORDER.—To carry out a revocation under 

paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the 

Federal Register a revocation order that— 

(A) terminates the withdrawal and reservation; 

(B) constitutes official acceptance of the land by the Secretary of the Interior; and 

(C) specifies the date on which the land will be opened 

to the operation of some or all of the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the 

geothermal leasing laws. 

(f) ACCEPTANCE BY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section requires the Secretary of the Interior to accept the land proposed for relinquishment if the Secretary determines that the land is not suitable 

for return to the public domain. 

(2) NOTICE.—If the Secretary makes a determination that the 

land is not suitable for return to the public domain, the Secretary shall provide notice of the determination to Congress. 

SEC. 2923. IMMUNITY OF THE UNITED STATES. 

The United States and officers and employees of the United States 

shall be held harmless and shall not be liable for any injuries or 

damages to persons or property incurred as a result of any mining 

or mineral or geothermal leasing activity or other authorized nondefense-related activity conducted on land withdrawn and reserved 

by this title. 

Subtitle B—Limestone Hills Training Area, 

Montana 

SEC. 2931. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND. 

(a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights and except as 

otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land (including interests in land) described in subsection (b), and all other areas within 

the boundaries of the land as depicted on the map referred to in 

such subsection that may become subject to the operation of the public land laws, is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under 

the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws. 

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The public land (including interests 

in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal land comprising 

approximately 18,644 acres in Broadwater County, Montana, generally depicted as ‘‘Proposed Land Withdrawal’’ on the map entitled 

‘‘Limestone Hills Training Area Land Withdrawal’’, dated April 10, 

2013, and filed in accordance with section 2912. 

(c) RESERVATION; PURPOSE.—Subject to the limitations and restrictions contained in section 2933, the public land withdrawn by 

subsection (a) is reserved for use by the Secretary of the Army for 

the following purposes: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
369 

(1) The conduct of training for active and reserve components 

of the Armed Forces. 

(2) The construction, operation, and maintenance of organizational support and maintenance facilities for component units 

conducting training. 

(3) The conduct of training by the Montana Department of 

Military Affairs, provided that the training does not interfere 

with the purposes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2). 

(4) The conduct of training by State and local law enforcement agencies, civil defense organizations, and public education 

institutions, provided that the training does not interfere with 

the purposes specified in paragraphs (1) and (2). 

(5) Other defense-related purposes consistent with the preceding purposes. 

(d) INDIAN TRIBES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this subtitle alters any rights reserved for an Indian tribe for tribal use of the public land withdrawn by subsection (a) by treaty or Federal law. 

(2) CONSULTATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army 

shall consult with any Indian tribes in the vicinity of the public 

land withdrawn by subsection (a) before taking any action 

within the public land affecting tribal rights or cultural resources protected by treaty or Federal law. 

SEC. 2932. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND. 

During the period of the withdrawal and reservation of land 

made by section 2931, the Secretary of the Army shall manage the 

land withdrawn and reserved by such section for the purposes described in subsection (c) of such section— 

(1) subject to the limitations and restrictions contained in section 2933; and 

(2) in accordance with— 

(A) an integrated natural resources management plan 

prepared and implemented under title I of the Sikes Act (16 

U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 

(B) subtitle A and this subtitle; and 

(C) other applicable law. 

SEC. 2933. SPECIAL RULES GOVERNING MINERALS MANAGEMENT. 

(a) INDIAN CREEK MINE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the land withdrawn by section 2931, 

locatable mineral activities in the approved Indian Creek Mine 

plan of operations, MTM–78300, shall be regulated in accordance with subparts 3715 and 3809 of title 43, Code of Federal 

Regulations. 

(2) RESTRICTIONS ON SECRETARY OF THE ARMY.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall make 

no determination that the disposition of, or exploration for, 

minerals as provided for in the approved plan of operations 

described in paragraph (1) is inconsistent with the defenserelated uses of the land withdrawn under section 2931. 

(B) COORDINATION.—The coordination of the disposition 

of and exploration for minerals with defense-related uses of 

the land shall be determined in accordance with procedures 

in an agreement provided for under subsection (c). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
370 

(b) REMOVAL OF UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE ON LAND TO BE

MINED.— 

(1) REMOVAL ACTIVITIES.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of funds appropriated for such purpose, the Secretary of the Army 

shall remove unexploded ordnance on land withdrawn by 

section 2931 that is subject to mining under subsection (a), 

consistent with applicable Federal and State law. 

(B) PHASES.—The Secretary of the Army may provide for 

the removal of unexploded ordnance in phases to accommodate the development of the Indian Creek Mine under subsection (a). 

(2) REPORT ON REMOVAL ACTIVITIES.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall annually submit to the Secretary of the Interior a report regarding any unexploded ordnance removal activities conducted 

during the previous fiscal year in accordance with this subsection. 

(B) INCLUSIONS.—The report under this paragraph shall 

include— 

(i) a description of the amounts expended for 

unexploded ordnance removal on the withdrawn land 

during the period covered by the report; and 

(ii) the identification of the land cleared of 

unexploded ordnance and approved for mining activities by the Secretary of the Interior. 

(c) IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT FOR MINING ACTIVITIES.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall enter into an agreement to implement 

this section with respect to the coordination of defense-related 

uses and mining and the ongoing removal of unexploded ordnance. 

(2) DURATION.—The duration of the agreement shall be equal 

to the period of the withdrawal under section 2936, but may be 

amended from time to time. 

(3) REQUIREMENTS.—The agreement shall provide the following: 

(A) That Graymont Western US, Inc., or any successor or 

assign of the approved Indian Creek Mine mining plan of 

operations, MTM–78300, shall be invited to be a party to 

the agreement. 

(B) Provisions regarding the day-to-day joint-use of the 

Limestone Hills Training Area. 

(C) Provisions addressing periods during which military 

and other authorized uses of the withdrawn land will 

occur. 

(D) Provisions regarding when and where military use or 

training with explosive material will occur. 

(E) Provisions regarding the scheduling of training activities conducted within the withdrawn land that restrict 

mining activities. 

(F) Procedures for deconfliction with mining operations, 

including parameters for notification and resolution of anticipated changes to the schedule. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
371 

(G) Procedures for access through mining operations covered by this section to training areas within the boundaries 

of the Limestone Hills Training Area. 

(H) Procedures for scheduling of the removal of 

unexploded ordnance. 

(d) EXISTING MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT.—Until the date on 

which the agreement under subsection (c) becomes effective, the compatible joint use of the land withdrawn and reserved by section 

2931 shall be governed, to the extent compatible, by the terms of the 

2005 Memorandum of Agreement among the Montana Army National Guard, Graymont Western US, Inc., and the Bureau of Land 

Management. 

SEC. 2934. GRAZING. 

(a) ISSUANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF PERMITS AND LEASES.— 

The Secretary of the Interior shall manage the issuance and administration of grazing permits and leases, including the renewal of 

permits and leases, on the public land withdrawn by section 2931, 

consistent with all applicable laws (including regulations) and policies of the Secretary of the Interior relating to the permits and 

leases. 

(b) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.—With respect to any grazing permit 

or lease issued after the date of enactment of this Act for land withdrawn by section 2931, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly establish procedures that— 

(1) are consistent with Department of the Army explosive and 

range safety standards; and 

(2) provide for the safe use of the withdrawn land. 

(c) ASSIGNMENT.—With the agreement of the Secretary of the 

Army, the Secretary of the Interior may assign the authority to issue 

and to administer grazing permits and leases to the Secretary of the 

Army, except that the assignment may not include the authority to 

discontinue grazing on the land withdrawn by section 2931. 

SEC. 2935. PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF TAXES. 

The land withdrawn by section 2931 is deemed to be entitlement 

land for purposes of chapter 69 of title 31, United States Code. 

SEC. 2936. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 

The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 

2931 shall terminate on March 31, 2039. 

Subtitle C—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, California 

SEC. 2941. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND. 

(a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights and except as 

otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land (including interests in land) described in subsection (b), and all other areas within 

the boundary of the land depicted on the map described in such 

subsection that may become subject to the operation of the public 

land laws, is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the 

public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing 

laws, and the geothermal leasing laws. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
372 

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The public land (including interests 

in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal land comprising 

approximately 150,928 acres in San Bernardino County, California, 

generally depicted on the map titled ‘‘MCAGCC 29 Palms Expansion Map-Johnson Valley Off Highway Vehicle Recreation Area’’, 

dated December 5, 2013, and filed in accordance with section 2912, 

which is divided into the following two areas: 

(1) The Exclusive Military Use Area (in this subtitle referred 

to as the ‘‘Exclusive Military Use Area’’), consisting of the following two areas: 

(A) One area to the west of the Marine Corps Air Ground 

Combat Center, consisting of approximately 78,993 acres. 

(B) One area south of the Marine Corps Air Ground 

Combat Center, consisting of approximately 18,704 acres. 

(2) The Shared Use Area (in this subtitle referred to as the 

‘‘Shared Use Area’’), consisting of approximately 53,231 acres. 

(c) RESERVATION FOR SECRETARY OF THE NAVY; PURPOSES.—The 

Exclusive Military Use Area is reserved for use by the Secretary of 

the Navy for the following purposes: 

(1) Sustained, combined arms, live-fire, and maneuver field 

training for large-scale Marine air ground task forces. 

(2) Individual and unit live-fire training ranges. 

(3) Equipment and tactics development. 

(4) Other defense-related purposes that are— 

(A) consistent with the purposes described in the preceding paragraphs; and 

(B) authorized under section 2914. 

(d) RESERVATION FOR SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR; PURPOSES.— 

The Shared Use Area is reserved— 

(1) for use by the Secretary of the Navy for the purposes described in subsection (c); and 

(2) for use by the Secretary of the Interior for the following 

purposes: 

(A) Public recreation— 

(i) during any period in which the land is not being 

used for military training; and 

(ii) as determined to be suitable for public use. 

(B) Natural resources conservation. 

(e) ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the Exclusive Military Use 

Area at Emerson Ridge provided in subsection (b)(1) shall be located in such as manner so as to ensure access to the pass northwest 

of the ridge for purposes described in subsection (d). 

SEC. 2942. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND. 

(a) MANAGEMENT BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY; CONDITION.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (b), during 

the period of withdrawal and reservation of land made by section 2941, the Secretary of the Navy shall manage the land 

withdrawn and reserved by such section for the purposes described in subsection (c) of such section in accordance with— 

(A) an integrated natural resources management plan 

prepared and implemented under title I of the Sikes Act (16 

U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 

(B) subtitle A and this subtitle; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
373 

(C) a programmatic agreement between the Marine Corps 

and the California State Historic Preservation Officer regarding operation, maintenance, training, and construction 

at the United States Marine Air Ground Task Force Training Command, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, 

Twentynine Palms, California; and 

(D) any other applicable law. 

(2) LIVE-FIRE TRAINING.—The boundary of the Exclusive Military Use Area described in section 2941 shall be clearly identified before the Exclusive Military Use Area is used for any livefire military training. The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure 

the military boundary is maintained. 

(b) MANAGEMENT BY THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR; EXCEPTION.— 

(1) SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR MANAGEMENT.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), 

during the period of withdrawal and reservation of land 

made by section 2941, the Secretary of the Interior shall 

manage the Shared Use Area. 

(B) APPLICABLE LAW.—During the period of the management by the Secretary of the Interior under this paragraph, 

the Secretary of the Interior shall manage the Shared Use 

Area for the purposes described in subsection (d) of section 

2941 in accordance with— 

(i) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 

1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(ii) any other applicable law. 

(2) SECRETARY OF THE NAVY MANAGEMENT.— 

(A) EXCEPTION.—Twice a year during the period of withdrawal and reservation of land by this section, there shall 

be a 30-day period during which the Secretary of the Navy 

shall— 

(i) manage the Shared Use Area; and 

(ii) exclusively use the Shared Use Area for military 

training purposes. 

(B) APPLICABLE LAW.—During the period of the management by the Secretary of the Navy under this paragraph, 

the Secretary of the Navy shall manage the Shared Use 

Area for the purposes described in subsection (c) of section 

2941 in accordance with— 

(i) an integrated natural resources management plan 

prepared and implemented in accordance with title I of 

the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 

(ii) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(iii) the programmatic agreement described in subsection (a)(3); and 

(iv) any other applicable law. 

(C) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Navy shall prohibit the firing of dud-producing ordnance into the Shared 

Use Area. 

(c) IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall enter into a written agreement to impleVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00405 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
374 

ment the management responsibilities of the respective Secretaries with respect to the Shared Use Area. 

(2) COMPONENTS.—The agreement entered into under paragraph (1)— 

(A) shall be of a duration that is equal to the period of 

the withdrawal and reservation of land under section 2941; 

(B) may be amended from time to time; 

(C) may provide for the integration of the management 

plans required of the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy; 

(D) may provide for delegation, to civilian law enforcement personnel of the Department of the Navy, of the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to enforce laws relating to protection of natural and cultural resources and fish 

and wildlife; and 

(E) may provide for the Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Navy to share resources so as to most efficiently and effectively manage the Shared Use Area. 

(3) LINKAGE.—The Secretary of the Interior shall ensure access is provided between the two non-contiguous Johnson Valley 

Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area parcels described in section 2945. 

(d) MILITARY TRAINING.— (1) NOT CONDITIONAL.—Military training within the Shared 

Use Area shall not be conditioned on— 

(A) the existence of, or precluded by the lack of, a recreation management plan or land use management plan for 

the area developed and implemented by the Secretary of the 

Interior; or 

(B) the existence of any legal or administrative challenge 

to such a recreation management plan or land use plan. 

(2) MANAGEMENT.— 

(A) USE AGREEMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

enter into an agreement with the Secretary of the Navy 

within one year of the date of the enactment of this Act for 

the exclusive use by the Marine Corps of two company objective areas, each measuring approximately 300 meters 

square (approximately 22 acres), located inside the boundaries of the Shared Use Area and totaling approximately 44 

acres. These areas will be closed to all public access for the 

period of the withdrawal specified in section 2946. The purpose of this agreement will be to accommodate the construction, maintenance, modification, and use of these areas for 

the purposes identified in section 2941(c). 

(B) RANGE MANAGEMENT.—Small, static, short-range explosives may be used in the two company objective areas 

described in subparagraph (A). Explosives that fail to function in the company objective areas will be immediately 

identified and located, training will temporarily halt, and 

on-scene explosive ordnance disposal personnel will render 

the munition safe before training resumes. Existing Marine 

Corps range safety policies and procedures as identified in 

Marine Corps Order 3570.1X will be followed to ensure all 

munitions are rendered safe and the area will again be 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
375 

swept after the training exercise by qualified personnel to 

further ensure no hazards remain. 

(C) ACCESS.—The Shared Use Area shall be managed in 

a manner that does not compromise the ability of the Navy 

to conduct military training in such area. 

SEC. 2943. PUBLIC ACCESS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 2913, the Exclusive 

Military Use Area shall be closed to all public access unless otherwise authorized by the Secretary of the Navy. 

(b) PUBLIC RECREATIONAL USE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Shared Use Area shall be open to public recreational use during the period in which the area is 

under the management of the Secretary of the Interior, if there 

is a determination by the Secretary of the Navy that the area 

is suitable for public use. 

(2) DETERMINATION.—A determination of suitability under 

paragraph (1) shall not be withheld without a specified reason. 

(c) UTILITIES.—Nothing in this subtitle prohibits the construction, 

operation, maintenance, inspection, and access to existing or future 

utility facilities located within a utility right of way in existence on 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 2944. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior, by agreement, shall establish a Resource Management Group for the land withdrawn and reserved by section 

2941 to be comprised of representatives of the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Navy. 

(b) DUTIES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Resource Management Group shall— 

(A) develop and implement a public outreach plan to inform the public of the land uses changes and safety restrictions affecting the land withdrawn and reserved by section 

2941; and 

(B) advise the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 

of the Navy with respect to the issues associated with the 

multiple uses of the Shared Use Area. 

(2) SITING PROCESS.—The Resource Management Group shall 

determine the location of the company objective areas. In siting 

the two areas, the Resource Management Group will seek information from representatives of relevant State agencies, Off 

Highway Vehicle and other recreation interest groups, and environmental advocacy groups. The Resource Management Group 

shall consider potential recreational and conservation uses of 

the area when making their location determination. 

(c) MEETINGS.—The Resource Management Group shall— 

(1) meet at least once a year; and 

(2) solicit input from relevant State agencies, private off-highway vehicle interest groups, event managers, environmental advocacy groups, and others relating to the management and facilitation of recreational use within the Shared Use Area. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
376 

SEC. 2945. JOHNSON VALLEY OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE RECREATION 

AREA. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—There is hereby designated the ‘‘Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area’’, consisting of— 

(1) 43,431 acres (as depicted on the map referred to in subsection (b) of section 2941) of the existing Bureau of Land Management-designated Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Area 

that is not withdrawn and reserved for defense-related uses by 

such section; and 

(2) The Shared Use Area. 

(b) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.—To the extent consistent with applicable Federal law (including regulations) and this subtitle, any authorized recreation activities and use designation in effect on the 

date of enactment of this Act and applicable to the Johnson Valley 

Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area may continue, including casual off-highway vehicular use and recreation. 

(c) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary of the Interior shall administer the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area 

(other than the Shared Use Area, which is being managed in accordance with the other provisions of this subtitle) in accordance 

with— 

(1) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(2) any other applicable law. 

(d) TRANSIT.—In coordination with the Secretary of the Interior, 

the Secretary of the Navy may authorize transit through the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area for defense-related 

purposes supporting military training (including military range 

management and management of exercise activities) conducted on 

the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2941. 

SEC. 2946. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 

The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 

2941 shall terminate on March 31, 2039. 

Subtitle D—White Sands Missile Range, 

New Mexico, and Fort Bliss, Texas 

SEC. 2951. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND. 

(a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal 

land described in subsection (b) is withdrawn from— 

(1) entry, appropriation, and disposal under the public land 

laws; 

(2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and 

(3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, and 

geothermal leasing laws. 

(b) DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL LAND.—The Federal land referred 

to in subsection (a) consists of approximately 5,100 acres of land depicted as ‘‘Parcel 1’’ on the map entitled ‘‘White Sands Missile 

Range/Fort Bliss/BLM Land Transfer and Withdrawal’’, dated 

April 3, 2012, and filed in accordance with section 2912. 

(c) RESERVATION.—The Federal land described in subsection (b) is 

reserved for use by the Secretary of the Army for military purposes 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
377 

in accordance with Public Land Order 833, dated May 27, 1952 (17 

Fed. Reg. 4822). 

SEC. 2952. GRAZING. 

(a) ISSUANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF PERMITS AND LEASES.— The Secretary of the Interior shall manage the issuance and administration of grazing permits and leases, including the renewal of 

permits and leases, on the public land withdrawn by section 2951, 

consistent with all applicable laws (including regulations) and policies of the Secretary of the Interior relating to the permits and 

leases. 

(b) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.—With respect to any grazing permit 

or lease issued after the date of enactment of this Act for land withdrawn by section 2951, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Army shall jointly establish procedures that— 

(1) are consistent with Department of the Army explosive and 

range safety standards; and 

(2) provide for the safe use of the withdrawn land. 

(c) ASSIGNMENT.—With the agreement of the Secretary of the 

Army, the Secretary of the Interior may assign the authority to issue 

and to administer grazing permits and leases to the Secretary of the 

Army, except that the assignment may not include the authority to 

discontinue grazing on the land withdrawn by section 2951. 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial 

Gunnery Range, California 

SEC. 2961. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION OF PUBLIC 

LAND. 

(a) TRANSFER REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the 

Navy certain public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management in Imperial and Riverside Counties, California, consisting 

of approximately 228,324 acres, as generally depicted on the map titled ‘‘Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range-Administration’s 

Land Withdrawal Legislation Proposal Map’’, dated October 30, 

2013, and filed in accordance with subsection (d). 

(b) VALID EXISTING RIGHTS.—The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall be subject to any valid existing 

rights, including any property, easements, or improvements held by 

the Bureau of Reclamation and appurtenant to the Coachella 

Canal. The Secretary of the Navy shall provide for reasonable access by the Bureau of Reclamation for inspection and maintenance 

purposes not inconsistent with military training. 

(c) TIME FOR CONVEYANCE.—The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall occur pursuant to a schedule 

agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the 

Navy. 

(d) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.— 

(1) PREPARATION AND PUBLICATION.—The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description 

of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a). 

(2) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of the Interior 

shall file with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
378 

of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the 

House of Representatives— 

(A) a copy of the legal description prepared under paragraph (1); and 

(B) the map referred to in subsection (a). 

(3) AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION.—Copies of the legal 

description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of— 

(A) the Bureau of Land Management; 

(B) the Office of the Commanding Officer, Marine Corps 

Air Station Yuma, Arizona; 

(C) the Office of the Commander, Navy Region Southwest; and 

(D) the Office of the Secretary of the Navy. 

(4) FORCE OF LAW.—The legal description and map filed 

under paragraph (2) shall have the same force and effect as if 

included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior 

may correct clerical and typographical errors in the legal description or map. 

(5) REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS.—The transfer required by 

subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except that 

the Secretary of the Navy shall reimburse the Secretary of the 

Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior 

to prepare the legal description and map under this subsection. 

SEC. 2962. MANAGEMENT AND USE OF TRANSFERRED LAND. 

(a) TREATMENT AND USE OF TRANSFERRED LAND.—Upon the receipt of the land under section 2961— 

(1) the land shall be treated as property (as defined in section 

102(9) of title 40, United States Code) under the administrative 

jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy; and 

(2) the Secretary of the Navy shall administer the land as the 

Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California, and 

continue to authorize use of the land for military purposes. 

(b) PROTECTION OF DESERT TORTOISE.—Nothing in the transfer 

required by section 2961 shall affect the prior designation of certain 

lands within the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range as critical habitat for the desert tortoise (Gopherus Agassizii). 

(c) WITHDRAWAL OF MINERAL ESTATE.—Subject to valid existing 

rights, the mineral estate of the land to be transferred under section 

2961 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public 

land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, 

and geothermal leasing laws, for as long as the land is under the 

administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. 

(d) INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN.—Not 

later than one year after the transfer of the land under section 2961, 

the Secretary of the Navy, in cooperation with the Secretary of the 

Interior, shall prepare an integrated natural resources management 

plan pursuant to the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.) for the 

transferred land and for land that, as of the date of the enactment 

of this Act, is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy underlying the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range. 

(e) RELATION TO GENERAL PROVISIONS.—Subtitle A does not 

apply to the land transferred under section 2961 or to the management of such land as provided for in this subtitle. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
379 

SEC. 2963. EFFECT OF TERMINATION OF MILITARY USE. 

(a) NOTICE AND EFFECT.—Upon a determination by the Secretary 

of the Navy that there is no longer a military need for all or portions of the land transferred under section 2961, the Secretary of the 

Navy shall notify the Secretary of the Interior of such determination. Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d), the Secretary of the 

Navy shall transfer the land subject to such a notice back to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior. 

(b) CONTAMINATION.—Before transmitting a notice under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall prepare a written determination concerning whether and to what extent the land to be 

transferred is contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous substances. A copy of the determination shall be transmitted 

with the notice. Copies of the notice and the determination shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

(c) DECONTAMINATION.—The Secretary of the Navy shall decontaminate any contaminated land that is the subject of a notice 

under subsection (a) if— 

(1) the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, determines that— 

(A) decontamination is practicable and economically feasible (taking into consideration the potential future use and 

value of the land); and 

(B) upon decontamination, the land could be opened to 

operation of some or all of the public land laws, including 

the mining laws; and 

(2) funds are appropriated for such decontamination. 

(d) ALTERNATIVE.—The Secretary of the Interior is not required to 

accept land proposed for transfer under subsection (a) if the Secretary of the Interior is unable to make the determinations under 

subsection (c)(1) or if Congress does not appropriate a sufficient 

amount of funds for the decontamination of the land. 

SEC. 2964. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF EXISTING WITHDRAWAL PERIOD. 

Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the California 

Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (title VIII 

of Public Law 103–433; 108 Stat. 4505), the withdrawal and reservation of the land transferred under section 2961 shall not terminate until the date on which the land transfer required by section 

2961 is executed. 

SEC. 2965. WATER RIGHTS. 

(a) NO RESERVATION OF WATER RIGHTS.—Nothing in this subtitle— 

(1) establishes a reservation in favor of the United States 

with respect to any water or water right on the land transferred 

by this subtitle; or 

(2) to authorize the appropriation of water on the land transferred by this subtitle except in accordance with applicable 

State law. 

(b) EFFECT ON PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED OR RESERVED WATER

RIGHTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this subtitle affects any water 

rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date 

of enactment of this Act on the land transferred by this subtitle. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
380 

(2) AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY.—The Secretary of the Navy 

may exercise any water rights described in paragraph (1). 

SEC. 2966. REALIGNMENT OF RANGE BOUNDARY AND RELATED TRANSFER OF TITLE. 

(a) REALIGNMENT; PURPOSE.—The Secretary of the Interior and 

the Secretary of the Navy shall realign the boundary of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, as in effect on the date of the 

enactment of this Act, to improve public safety and management of 

the Range, consistent with the following: 

(1) The northwestern boundary of the Chocolate Mountain 

Aerial Gunnery Range shall be realigned to the edge of the 

Bradshaw Trail so that the Trail is entirely on public land 

under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior. 

(2) The centerline of the Bradshaw Trail shall be delineated 

by the Secretary of the Interior in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, beginning at its western terminus at Township 8 South, Range 12 East, Section 6 eastward to Township 

8 South, Range 17 East, Section 32 where it leaves the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range. 

(3) The Secretary of the Navy shall relinquish to the Secretary of the Interior the approximately 2,000 acres of public 

land withdrawn for military use that is located immediately 

north of the Bradshaw Trail, and the Secretary of the Interior 

shall manage the land in accordance with the applicable land 

use plan developed under section of section 202 of the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712). 

(b) TRANSFERS RELATED TO REALIGNMENT.— (1) TRANSFERS TO REFLECT BOUNDARY REALIGNMENT.—The 

Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy shall 

make such transfers of administrative jurisdiction as may be 

necessary to reflect the results of the boundary realignment carried out pursuant to subsection (a). 

(2) BRADSHAW TRAIL MANAGEMENT.—The approximately 600 

acres of land north of the Bradshaw Trail identified as feeowned lands available for disposal may be used to establish a 

maximum number of acres of land that the Secretary of the 

Navy may transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior in order to improve management of the 

Bradshaw Trail. 

(c) APPLICABILITY OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF

1969.—The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 

4321 et seq.) shall not apply to any transfer of land made under 

subsection (b) or any decontamination actions undertaken in connection with such a transfer. 

(d) DECONTAMINATION.—The Secretary of the Navy shall maintain, to the extent funds are available for such purpose and consistent with applicable Federal and State law, a program of decontamination of any contamination caused by defense-related uses on 

land transferred under subsection (b). The Secretary of Defense 

shall include a description of such decontamination activities in the 

annual report required by section 2711 of title 10, United States 

Code. 

(e) TIMELINE.—The delineation of the Bradshaw Trail under subsection (a) and any transfer of land under subsection (b) shall occur 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
381 

pursuant to a schedule agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and 

the Secretary of the Navy, but in no case later than two years after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Subtitle F—Naval Air Weapons Station 

China Lake, California 

SEC. 2971. WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION OF PUBLIC LAND. 

(a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights and except as 

otherwise provided in this subtitle, the public land (including interests in land) described in subsection (b), and all other areas within 

the boundary of the land depicted on the map described in that subsection that may become subject to the operation of the public land 

laws, is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public 

land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, 

and the geothermal leasing laws. 

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The public land (including interests 

in land) referred to in subsection (a) is the Federal land located 

within the boundaries of the Naval Air Weapons Station China 

Lake, California, comprising approximately 1,045,000 acres in Inyo, 

Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California, as generally depicted on the maps entitled ‘‘Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake 

Withdrawal—Renewal’’, ‘‘North Range’’, and ‘‘South Range’’, dated 

March 18, 2013, and filed in accordance with section 2912. 

(c) RESERVATION.—The land withdrawn by subsection (a) is reserved for use by the Secretary of the Navy for the following purposes: 

(1) Use as a research, development, test, and evaluation laboratory. 

(2) Use as a range for air warfare weapons and weapon systems. 

(3) Use as a high-hazard testing and training area for aerial 

gunnery, rocketry, electronic warfare and countermeasures, tactical maneuvering and air support, and directed energy and unmanned aerial systems. 

(4) Geothermal leasing, development, and related power production activities. 

(5) Other defense-related purposes that are— 

(A) consistent with the purposes described in the preceding paragraphs; and 

(B) authorized under section 2914. 

SEC. 2972. MANAGEMENT OF WITHDRAWN AND RESERVED LAND. 

(a) APPLICABLE LAWS.—Except as provided in section 2973, during the period of the withdrawal and reservation of land by section 

2971, the Secretary of the Interior shall manage the land withdrawn and reserved by that section in accordance with— 

(1) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(2) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(3) any other applicable law. 

(b) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.—To the extent consistent with applicable law and Executive orders, the land withdrawn by section 2971 

may be managed in a manner that permits the following activities: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
382 

(1) Grazing. 

(2) Protection of wildlife and wildlife habitat. 

(3) Preservation of cultural properties. 

(4) Control of predatory and other animals. 

(5) Recreation and education. 

(6) Prevention and appropriate suppression of brush and 

range fires resulting from non-military activities. 

(7) Geothermal leasing and development and related power 

production activities. 

(c) NONDEFENSE USES.—All nondefense-related uses of the land 

withdrawn by this section (including the uses described in subsection (b)), shall be subject to any conditions and restrictions that 

the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy jointly 

determine to be necessary to permit the defense-related use of the 

land for the purposes described in this section. 

(d) ISSUANCE OF LEASES AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall be responsible for the issuance of any lease, easement, right-of-way, 

permit, license, or other instrument authorized by law with respect to any activity that involves both— 

(A) the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971; 

and 

(B) any other public land in the vicinity of the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971 that is not under the 

administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. 

(2) CONSENT REQUIRED.—Subject to section 2974, any lease, 

easement, right-of-way, permit, license, or other instrument 

issued under paragraph (1) shall— 

(A) only be issued with the consent of the Secretary of the 

Navy; and 

(B) be subject to such conditions as the Secretary of the 

Navy may require with respect to the land withdrawn and 

reserved by section 2971. 

SEC. 2973. ASSIGNMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY TO SECRETARY OF THE NAVY. 

(a) AUTHORITY TO ASSIGN MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY.—The 

Secretary of the Interior may assign the management responsibility, 

in whole or in part, for the land withdrawn and reserved by section 

2971 to the Secretary of the Navy. 

(b) APPLICABLE LAW.—On assignment of the management responsibility under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall manage 

the land in accordance with— 

(1) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(2) title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); 

(3) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); 

(4) cooperative management arrangements entered into by the 

Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy; and 

(5) any other applicable law. 

SEC. 2974. GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES. 

(a) TREATMENT OF EXISTING LEASES.—Nothing in this subtitle affects— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
383 

(1) geothermal leases issued by the Secretary of the Interior 

before the date of enactment of this Act; or 

(2) the responsibility of the Secretary of the Interior to administer and manage the leases described in paragraph (1) consistent with the provisions of this subtitle. 

(b) AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.—Nothing in 

this subtitle or any other provision of law prohibits the Secretary of 

the Interior from issuing, subject to the concurrence of the Secretary 

of the Navy, and administering any lease under the Geothermal 

Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) and any other applicable 

law for the development and use of geothermal steam and associated geothermal resources on the land withdrawn and reserved by 

section 2971. 

(c) APPLICABLE LAW.—Nothing in this subtitle affects the geothermal exploration and development authority of the Secretary of 

the Navy under section 2917 of title 10, United States Code, with 

respect to the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971, except 

that the Secretary of the Navy shall obtain the concurrence of the 

Secretary of the Interior before taking action under section 2917 of 

title 10, United States Code. 

(d) NAVY CONTRACTS.—On the expiration of the withdrawal and 

reservation of land under section 2971 or the relinquishment of the 

land, any Navy contract for the development of geothermal resources 

at Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake that is in effect on the 

date of the expiration or relinquishment shall remain in effect, except that the Secretary of the Interior, with the consent of the Secretary of the Navy, may offer to substitute a standard geothermal 

lease for the contract. 

SEC. 2975. WILD HORSES AND BURROS. 

(a) MANAGEMENT.—The Secretary of the Navy— 

(1) shall be responsible for the management of wild horses 

and burros located on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971; and 

(2) may use helicopters and motorized vehicles for the management of wild horses and burros on such land. 

(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The activities authorized under subsection 

(a) shall be conducted in accordance with laws applicable to the 

management of wild horses and burros on public land. 

(c) AGREEMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary 

of the Navy shall enter into an agreement for the implementation 

of the management of wild horses and burros under this section. 

SEC. 2976. CONTINUATION OF EXISTING AGREEMENT. 

The agreement between the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy entered into before the date of enactment of this 

Act under section 805 of the California Military Lands Withdrawal 

and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–433; 108 Stat. 4503) 

shall continue in effect until the earlier of— 

(1) the date on which the Secretary of the Interior and the 

Secretary of the Navy enter into a new agreement to replace 

such section 805 agreement; or 

(2) the date that is one year after the date of enactment of this 

Act. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
384 

SEC. 2977. MANAGEMENT PLANS. 

(a) COOPERATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT PLAN.—The 

Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall update 

and maintain cooperative arrangements concerning land resources 

and land uses on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971. 

(b) PURPOSE.—A cooperative arrangement entered into under subsection (a) shall focus on and apply to sustainable management and 

protection of the natural and cultural resources and environmental 

values found on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971, 

consistent with the defense-related purposes for which the land is 

withdrawn and reserved. 

(c) COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MANAGEMENT PLAN.—A cooperative arrangement entered into under subsection (a) shall include a 

comprehensive land use management plan that integrates and is 

consistent with any applicable law, including— 

(1) subtitle A and this subtitle; 

(2) title I of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.); and 

(3) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

(d) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall— 

(1) annually review the comprehensive land use management 

plan developed under subsection (c); and 

(2) update the comprehensive land use management plan as 

the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior determine to be necessary— 

(A) to respond to evolving management requirements; 

and 

(B) to complement the updates of other applicable land 

use and resource management and planning. 

(e) IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a written agreement to implement the comprehensive land use management plan developed 

under subsection (c). 

(2) COMPONENTS.—Such an implementation agreement— 

(A) shall be for a duration that is equal to the period of 

the withdrawal and reservation of land under section 2971; 

and 

(B) may be amended from time to time. 

SEC. 2978. TERMINATION OF PRIOR WITHDRAWALS. 

(a) TERMINATION.—Subject to subsection (b), the withdrawal and 

reservation under section 803(a) of the California Military Lands 

Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–433; 108 

Stat. 4502) is terminated. 

(b) LIMITATION.—Notwithstanding the termination under subsection (a), all rules, regulations, orders, permits, and other privileges issued or granted by the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of the Navy with respect to the land withdrawn and reserved 

under section 803(a) of the California Military Lands Withdrawal 

and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–433; 108 Stat. 4502), 

unless inconsistent with the provisions of this subtitle, shall remain 

in force until modified, suspended, overruled, or otherwise changed 

by— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
385 

(1) the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of the Navy 

(as applicable); 

(2) a court of competent jurisdiction; or 

(3) operation of law. 

SEC. 2979. DURATION OF WITHDRAWAL AND RESERVATION. 

The withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 

2971 shall terminate on March 31, 2039. 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup. 

Sec. 3103. Other defense activities. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Sec. 3111. Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3112. Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security 

Administration. 

Sec. 3113. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk. 

Sec. 3114. Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security Administration. 

Sec. 3115. Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security. 

Sec. 3116. Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, and 

Testing. 

Sec. 3117. Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building, 

Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. 

Sec. 3118. Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options. 

Sec. 3119. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions 

to carry out certain research projects. 

Sec. 3120. Increase in construction design threshold. 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 

Sec. 3121. Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy defense facilities. 

Sec. 3122. Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear 

weapons stockpile. 

Sec. 3123. Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons stockpile 

stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan. 

Sec. 3124. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and 

operating contracts. 

Sec. 3125. Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation. 

Sec. 3126. Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium capabilities replacement project. 

Sec. 3127. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation. 

Sec. 3128. Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of nuclear security enterprise. 

Sec. 3129. Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such computing into the stockpile stewardship program. 

Sec. 3130. Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles. 

Sec. 3131. Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries. 

Sec. 3132. Repeal of certain reporting requirements. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
386 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

Sec. 3141. Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy. 

Sec. 3142. Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise. 

Sec. 3143. Department of Energy land conveyance. 

Sec. 3144. Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

Sec. 3145. Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration 

Act. 

Sec. 3146. Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act. 

Sec. 3147. Sense of Congress on B61–12 life extension program. 

Sec. 3148. Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic substances and worker health. 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs 

Authorizations 

SEC. 3101. NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

(a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal 

year 2014 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table 

in section 4701. 

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF NEW PLANT PROJECTS.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant 

projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects 

for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows: 

Project 14–D–710, Device Assembly Facility Argus Installation Project, Nevada National Security Site, Las Vegas, 

Nevada, $14,000,000. 

Project 14–D–901, Spent Fueling Handling Recapitalization Project, Naval Reactors Facility, Idaho, $45,400,000. 

Project 14–D–902, KL Materials Characterization Laboratory, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, 

New York, $1,000,000. 

SEC. 3102. DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding 

table in section 4701. 

SEC. 3103. OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for other defense activities in 

carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 

4701. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, 

Restrictions, and Limitations 

SEC. 3111. CLARIFICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

Subsection (c) of section 3211 of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) is amended to read as follows: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
387 

‘‘(c) OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT CONSIST- ENTLY WITH CERTAIN PRINCIPLES.—In carrying out the mission of 

the Administration, the Administrator shall ensure that all operations and activities of the Administration are consistent with the 

principles of— 

‘‘(1) protecting the environment; 

‘‘(2) safeguarding the safety and health of the public and of 

the workforce of the Administration; and 

‘‘(3) ensuring the security of the nuclear weapons, nuclear material, and classified information in the custody of the Administration.’’. 

SEC. 3112. COST ESTIMATION AND PROGRAM EVALUATION BY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT OF DIRECTOR FOR COST ESTIMATING AND

PROGRAM EVALUATION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘SEC. 3221. DIRECTOR FOR COST ESTIMATING AND PROGRAM EVALUATION. 

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—(1) There is in the Administration a Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation (in this section referred to as the ‘Director’). 

‘‘(2) The position of the Director shall be a Senior Executive Service position (as defined in section 3132(a) of title 5, United States 

Code). 

‘‘(b) DUTIES.—(1) The Director shall be the principal advisor to 

the Administrator, the Deputy Secretary of Energy, and the Secretary of Energy with respect to cost estimation and program evaluation for the Administration. 

‘‘(2) The Administrator may not delegate responsibility for receiving or acting on communications from the Director with respect to 

cost estimation and program evaluation for the Administration. 

‘‘(c) ACTIVITIES FOR COST ESTIMATION.—(1) The Director shall be 

the responsible for the following activities relating to cost estimation: 

‘‘(A) Advising the Administrator on policies and procedures 

for cost analysis and estimation by the Administration, including the determination of confidence levels with respect to cost 

estimates. 

‘‘(B) Reviewing cost estimates and evaluating the performance 

baseline for each major atomic energy defense acquisition program. 

‘‘(C) Advising the Administrator on policies and procedures 

for developing technology readiness assessments for major 

atomic energy defense acquisition programs that are consistent 

with the guidelines of the Department of Energy for technology 

readiness assessments. 

‘‘(D) Reviewing technology readiness assessments for such 

programs to ensure that such programs are meeting levels of 

confidence associated with appropriate overall system performance. 

‘‘(E) As directed by the Administrator, conducting independent cost estimates for such programs. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
388 

‘‘(2) A review, evaluation, or cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) shall be considered an 

inherently governmental function, but the Director may use data 

collected by a national security laboratory or a management and operating contractor of the Administration in conducting such a review, evaluation, or cost estimate. 

‘‘(3) The Director shall submit in writing to the Administrator the 

following: 

‘‘(A) The certification of the Director with respect to each review, evaluation, and cost estimate conducted under subparagraph (B), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1). 

‘‘(B) A statement of the confidence level of the Director with 

respect to each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate, including an identification of areas of uncertainty, risk, and opportunity discovered in conducting each such review, evaluation, and cost estimate. 

‘‘(d) ACTIVITIES FOR PROGRAM EVALUATION.—(1) The Director 

shall be responsible for the following activities relating to program 

evaluation: 

‘‘(A) Reviewing and commenting on policies and procedures 

for setting requirements for the future-years nuclear security 

program under section 3253 and for prioritizing and estimating 

the funding required by the Administration for that program. 

‘‘(B) Reviewing the future-years nuclear security program on 

an annual basis to ensure that the program is accurate and 

thorough. 

‘‘(C) Advising the Administrator on policies and procedures 

for analyses of alternatives for major atomic energy defense acquisition programs. 

‘‘(D) As part of the planning, programming, and budgeting 

process of the Administration under sections 3251 and 3252, 

analyzing the planning phase of that process, advising on programmatic and fiscal year guidance, and managing the program review phase of that process. 

‘‘(E) Developing and managing the submittal of the Selected 

Acquisition Reports and independent cost estimates on nuclear 

weapons systems undergoing major life extension under section 

4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537). 

‘‘(F) Reviewing cost and schedule baselines for projects under 

section 4713 of that Act (50 U.S.C. 2753) and managing notifications to the congressional defense committees of cost overruns 

under that section. 

‘‘(2) A review conducted under paragraph (1)(B) shall be considered an inherently governmental function, but the Director may use 

data collected by a national security laboratory or a management 

and operating contractor of the Administration in conducting such 

a review. 

‘‘(3) The Director shall submit to Congress a report on any major 

programmatic deviations from the future-years nuclear security program discovered in conducting a review under paragraph (1)(B) at 

or about the time the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for the 

next fiscal year. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
389 

‘‘(e) DATA COLLECTION AND ACCESSIBILITY.—The Administrator, 

acting through the Director, shall, as appropriate, seek to use procedures, processes, and policies for collecting cost data and making 

that data accessible that are similar to the procedures, processes, 

and policies used by the Defense Cost Analysis Resource Center of 

the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense for those purposes. 

‘‘(f) STAFF.—The Administrator shall ensure that the Director has 

sufficient numbers of personnel who have competence in technical 

matters, budgetary matters, cost estimation, technology readiness 

analysis, and other appropriate matters to carry out the functions 

required by this section. 

‘‘(g) REPORTS BY DIRECTOR.—The Director shall submit to Congress at or about the time that the budget of the President is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United 

States Code, for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2018, a report 

that includes the following: 

‘‘(1) A description of activities conducted by the Director during the calendar year preceding the submission of the report 

that are related to the duties and activities described in this 

section. 

‘‘(2) A list of all major atomic energy defense acquisition programs and a concise description of the status of each such program and project in meeting cost and critical schedule milestones. 

‘‘(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) MAJOR ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAM.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph 

(B), the term ‘major atomic energy defense acquisition program’ means an atomic energy defense acquisition program 

of the Administration— 

‘‘(i) the total project cost of which is more than 

$500,000,000; or 

‘‘(ii) the total lifetime cost of which is more than 

$1,000,000,000. 

‘‘(B) EXCLUSION OF CAPITAL ASSETS ACQUISITION

PROJECTS.—The term ‘major atomic energy defense acquisition program’ does not include a project covered by Department of Energy Order 413.3 (or a successor order) for the 

acquisition of capital assets for atomic energy defense activities. 

‘‘(2) PERFORMANCE BASELINE.—The term ‘performance baseline’, with respect to a major atomic energy defense acquisition 

program, means the key parameters with respect to performance, scope, cost, and schedule for the project budget of the program.’’. 

(2) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 270 days after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear 

Security and the Director of the Office of Cost Assessment and 

Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense shall jointly 

submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the 

implementation of section 3221 of the National Nuclear SecuVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00421 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
390 

rity Administration Act, as added by paragraph (1), that includes the following: 

(A) An identification of the number of personnel required 

to support the Director for Cost Estimating and Program 

Evaluation established under such section 3221. 

(B) A description of the functions of such personnel. 

(C) A plan for training such personnel in coordination 

with the Office of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation 

of the Department of Defense with respect to the activities 

described in subsections (c)(1) and (d)(1) of such section 

3221. 

(D) An estimate of the time required to hire and train 

such personnel. 

(E) A plan for developing cost estimation and program 

evaluation activities jointly with the Department of Defense 

on strategic system programs to the extent practicable and 

beneficial to both the National Nuclear Security Administration and the Department of Defense. 

(3) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the National Nuclear Security Administration Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3220 the following new 

item: 

‘‘Sec. 3221. Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation.’’. 

(b) INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATES ON LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAMS AND NEW NUCLEAR FACILITIES.—Section 4217(b) of the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘for purposes of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘submitted under this subsection before 

October 1, 2015,’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) Each cost estimate submitted under this subsection shall be 

submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex 

if necessary.’’. 

SEC. 3113. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SUPPLY CHAIN RISK. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic Energy 

Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is amended by adding at the 

end the following new section: 

‘‘SEC. 4806. ENHANCED PROCUREMENT AUTHORITY TO MANAGE SUPPLY CHAIN RISK. 

‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Energy may— 

‘‘(1) carry out a covered procurement action; and 

‘‘(2) notwithstanding any other provision of law, limit, in 

whole or in part, the disclosure of information relating to the 

basis for carrying out a covered procurement action. 

‘‘(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary may exercise the authority 

under subsection (a) only after— 

‘‘(1) obtaining a risk assessment that demonstrates that there 

is a significant supply chain risk to a covered system; 

‘‘(2) making a determination in writing, in unclassified or 

classified form, that— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
391 

‘‘(A) the use of the authority under subsection (a) is necessary to protect national security by reducing supply chain 

risk; 

‘‘(B) less restrictive measures are not reasonably available 

to reduce the supply chain risk; and 

‘‘(C) in a case in which the Secretary plans to limit disclosure of information under subsection (a)(2), the risk to 

national security of the disclosure of the information outweighs the risk of not disclosing the information; and 

‘‘(3) submitting to the appropriate congressional committees, 

not later than seven days after the date on which the Secretary 

makes the determination under paragraph (2), a notice of such 

determination, in classified or unclassified form, that includes— 

‘‘(A) the information required by section 3304(e)(2)(A) of 

title 41, United States Code; 

‘‘(B) a summary of the risk assessment required under 

paragraph (1); and 

‘‘(C) a summary of the basis for the determination, including a discussion of less restrictive measures that were 

considered and why such measures were not reasonably 

available to reduce supply chain risk. 

‘‘(c) NOTIFICATIONS.—If the Secretary has exercised the authority 

under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

‘‘(1) notify appropriate parties of the covered procurement action and the basis for the action only to the extent necessary to 

carry out the covered procurement action; 

‘‘(2) notify other Federal agencies responsible for procurement 

that may be subject to the same or similar supply chain risk, 

in a manner and to the extent consistent with the requirements 

of national security; and 

‘‘(3) ensure the confidentiality of any notifications under paragraph (1) or (2). 

‘‘(d) LIMITATION OF REVIEW.—No action taken by the Secretary 

under the authority under subsection (a) shall be subject to review 

in any Federal court. 

‘‘(e) REVIEW BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED

STATES.—Not later than one year after the effective date specified in 

subsection (g)(1), and annually for four years thereafter, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— 

‘‘(1) review the authority provided under subsection (a), including— 

‘‘(A) the adequacy of resources, such as trained personnel, 

to effectively exercise that authority during the four-year period beginning on that effective date; and 

‘‘(B) the sufficiency of determinations under subsection 

(b)(2); 

‘‘(2) review the thoroughness of the process and systems utilized by the Office of the Chief Information Officer and the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence of the Department of 

Energy to reasonably detect supply chain threats to the national 

security functions of the Department; and 

‘‘(3) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
392 

‘‘(A) the results of the reviews conducted under paragraphs (1) and (2); 

‘‘(B) any recommendations of the Comptroller General for 

improving the process and systems described in paragraph 

(2); and 

‘‘(C) a description of the status of the implementation of 

recommendations, if any, with respect to that process and 

such systems made by the Comptroller General in previous 

years. 

‘‘(f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

‘‘(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term 

‘appropriate congressional committees’ means— 

‘‘(A) the congressional defense committees; and 

‘‘(B) the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of 

the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of 

the House of Representatives. 

‘‘(2) COVERED ITEM OF SUPPLY.—The term ‘covered item of 

supply’ means an item— 

‘‘(A) that is purchased for inclusion in a covered system; 

and 

‘‘(B) the loss of integrity of which could result in a supply 

chain risk for a covered system. 

‘‘(3) COVERED PROCUREMENT.—The term ‘covered procurement’ means the following: 

‘‘(A) A source selection for a covered system or a covered 

item of supply involving either a performance specification, 

as described in subsection (a)(3)(B) of section 3306 of title 

41, United States Code, or an evaluation factor, as described in subsection (b)(1) of such section, relating to supply chain risk. 

‘‘(B) The consideration of proposals for and issuance of a 

task or delivery order for a covered system or a covered 

item of supply, as provided in section 4106(d)(3) of title 41, 

United States Code, where the task or delivery order contract concerned includes a contract clause establishing a requirement relating to supply chain risk. 

‘‘(C) Any contract action involving a contract for a covered system or a covered item of supply if the contract includes a clause establishing requirements relating to supply 

chain risk. 

‘‘(4) COVERED PROCUREMENT ACTION.—The term ‘covered procurement action’ means, with respect to an action that occurs in 

the course of conducting a covered procurement, any of the following: 

‘‘(A) The exclusion of a source that fails to meet qualification requirements established pursuant to section 3311 of 

title 41, United States Code, for the purpose of reducing 

supply chain risk in the acquisition of covered systems. 

‘‘(B) The exclusion of a source that fails to achieve an acceptable rating with regard to an evaluation factor providing for the consideration of supply chain risk in the 

evaluation of proposals for the award of a contract or the 

issuance of a task or delivery order. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
393 

‘‘(C) The withholding of consent for a contractor to subcontract with a particular source or the direction to a contractor for a covered system to exclude a particular source 

from consideration for a subcontract under the contract. 

‘‘(5) COVERED SYSTEM.—The term ‘covered system’ means the 

following: 

‘‘(A) National security systems (as defined in section 

3542(b) of title 44, United States Code) and components of 

such systems. 

‘‘(B) Nuclear weapons and components of nuclear weapons. 

‘‘(C) Items associated with the design, development, production, and maintenance of nuclear weapons or components of nuclear weapons. 

‘‘(D) Items associated with the surveillance of the nuclear 

weapon stockpile. 

‘‘(E) Items associated with the design and development of 

nonproliferation and counterproliferation programs and 

systems. 

‘‘(6) SUPPLY CHAIN RISK.—The term ‘supply chain risk’ means 

the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce 

unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, 

manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, 

or maintenance of a covered system or covered item of supply 

so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or operation of the system or item of supply. 

‘‘(g) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This section shall take effect on the date 

that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. 

‘‘(2) APPLICABILITY.—The authority under subsection (a) shall 

apply to— 

‘‘(A) contracts awarded on or after the effective date specified in paragraph (1); and 

‘‘(B) task and delivery orders issued on or after that effective date pursuant to contracts awarded before, on, or after 

that effective date. 

‘‘(3) TERMINATION.—The authority under this section shall 

terminate on the date that is four years after the effective date 

specified in paragraph (1).’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the Atomic 

Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 4805 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4806. Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk.’’. 

SEC. 3114. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR NATIONAL 

NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

(a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subsection (d), of the 

funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made 

available for fiscal year 2014 for the National Nuclear Security Administration, the amount specified in subsection (c) may not be obligated or expended until the date on which the Administrator for 

Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees— 

(1) a detailed plan to realize the planned efficiencies; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
394 

(2) written certification that the planned efficiencies will be 

achieved during fiscal year 2014. 

(b) UNREALIZED EFFICIENCIES.—If the Administrator does not 

submit to the congressional defense committees the matters described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a) by the date that 

is 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

on— 

(1) the amount of planned efficiencies that will not be realized 

during fiscal year 2014; and 

(2) any effects caused by such unrealized planned efficiencies 

to the programs funded under the directed stockpile work and 

nuclear programs accounts. 

(c) AMOUNT SPECIFIED.—The amount specified in this subsection is $139,500,000, reduced by the amount the Administrator certifies 

to the congressional defense committees that the Administrator has 

saved through the planned efficiencies realized during fiscal year 

2014. 

(d) EXCEPTIONS.—The limitation under subsection (a) shall not— 

(1) apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for directed 

stockpile work, nuclear programs, or Naval Reactors; or 

(2) affect the authority of the Secretary of Energy under sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751). 

(e) EFFECT OF PLANNED EFFICIENCIES ON LABORATORY-DIRECTED

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.—The implementation of the planned 

efficiencies may not result in reductions in amounts provided for 

laboratory-directed research and development under section 4811(c) 

of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2791(c)) in fiscal year 

2014. 

(f) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The limitation under subsection (a) 

shall not be considered a specific denial of funds for purposes of the 

authority referred to in subsection (d)(2). 

(g) PLANNED EFFICIENCIES DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘planned efficiencies’’ means the $106,800,000, with respect to directed stockpile work, and $32,700,000, with respect to nuclear programs, that the Administrator plans to save during fiscal year 2014 

through management efficiency and workforce restructuring reductions, as described in the budget request for fiscal year 2014 that 

the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 

31, United States Code. 

SEC. 3115. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR OFFICE OF 

THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY. 

Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by 

section 3101 and available for the Office of the Administrator as 

specified in the funding table in section 4701, or otherwise made 

available for that Office for that fiscal year, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until— 

(1) the President transmits to Congress the matters required 

to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 under section 

4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2525(f)(2)); 

(2) the President transmits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
395 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the matters— 

(A) required to be transmitted during 2013 and 2014 

under section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 

1576); and 

(B) with respect to which the Secretary of Energy is responsible; 

(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives 

the reports required to be submitted during 2013 and 2014 

under section 3122(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1710); and 

(4) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees— 

(A) the detailed report on the stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan required to be submitted 

during 2013 under paragraph (2) of section 4203(b) of the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)); and 

(B) the summary of the plan required to be submitted 

during 2014 under paragraph (1) of such section. 

SEC. 3116. ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTER FOR SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, 

ANALYSIS, RESPONSE, AND TESTING. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security 

shall establish within the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in 

section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501) a 

Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, and Testing. 

(b) DUTIES.—The center established under subsection (a) shall 

carry out the following: 

(1) Provide to the Administrator, the Chief of Defense Nuclear 

Security, and the management and operating contractors of the 

nuclear security enterprise a wide range of objective expertise on 

security technologies, systems, analysis, testing, and response 

forces. 

(2) Assist the Administrator in developing standards, requirements, analysis methods, and testing criteria with respect to security. 

(3) Collect, analyze, and distribute lessons learned with respect to security. 

(4) Support inspections and oversight activities with respect 

to security. 

(5) Promote professional development and training for security professionals. 

(6) Provide for advance and bulk procurement for security-related acquisitions that affect multiple facilities of the nuclear 

security enterprise. 

(7) Advocate for continual improvement and security excellence throughout the nuclear security enterprise. 

(8) Such other duties as the Administrator may assign. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
396 

SEC. 3117. AUTHORIZATION OF MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY AS AN 

ALTERNATIVE TO THE REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR THE 

CHEMISTRY AND METALLURGY RESEARCH BUILDING, LOS 

ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY, NEW MEXICO. 

Section 3114(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2171; 50 U.S.C. 2535 

note) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘No funds’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Except as provided in 

paragraph (2), no funds’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

‘‘(2) USE OF FUNDS FOR MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY.—The 

Administrator for Nuclear Security may obligate and expend 

funds referred to in paragraph (1) for activities relating to a 

modular building strategy on and after the date that is 60 days 

after the date on which the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, notifies 

the congressional defense committees that— 

‘‘(A) the modular building strategy— 

‘‘(i) meets requirements for maintaining the nuclear 

weapons stockpile over a 30-year period; 

‘‘(ii) meets requirements for implementation of a responsive infrastructure, including meeting plutonium 

pit production requirements; and 

‘‘(iii) will achieve full operating capability for not 

less than two modular structures by not later than 

2027; 

‘‘(B) in fiscal year 2015, the National Nuclear Security 

Administration will begin the process of designing and 

building modular buildings in accordance with Department of Energy Order 413.3 (relating to relating to program management and project management for the acquisition of capital assets); and 

‘‘(C) the Administrator will include the costs of the modular building strategy in the estimated expenditures and 

proposed appropriations reflected in the future-years nuclear security program submitted under section 3253 of the 

National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 

2453). 

‘‘(3) MODULAR BUILDING STRATEGY DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘modular building strategy’ means an alternative strategy to the replacement project that consists of 

repurposing existing facilities and constructing a series of modular structures, each of which is fully useable, to complement 

the function of the plutonium facility (PF–4) at Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, in accordance with all applicable safety and security standards of the Department of Energy.’’. 

SEC. 3118. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WARHEAD LIFE EXTENSION 

OPTIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out Phase 6.2 and Phase 6.2A of 

the Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension Program, the Secretary 

of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Nuclear 

Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United 

States Code, shall conduct a comparative analysis of the feasibility 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
397 

of, and preliminary design definitions and cost estimates for, each 

of the following life extension options: 

(1) A separate life extension option to produce a W78–1 warhead. 

(2) A separate life extension option to produce a W88–1 warhead. 

(3) An interoperable W78/88–1 life extension option. 

(4) Any other life extension option the Nuclear Weapons 

Council considers appropriate. 

(b) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—None of the funds authorized 

to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended for 

Phase 6.3 (development engineering) activities for the Joint W78/ 

88–1 Warhead Life Extension Program until the date that is 90 

days after the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council submits 

to the congressional defense committees a report containing the comparative analysis required by subsection (a). 

SEC. 3119. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY TO 

ENTER INTO TRANSACTIONS TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN RESEARCH PROJECTS. 

Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Organization Act 

(42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

2015’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2020’’. 

SEC. 3120. INCREASE IN CONSTRUCTION DESIGN THRESHOLD. 

Section 4706(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2746(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘$600,000’’ both places it appears 

and inserting ‘‘$1,000,000’’. 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 

SEC. 3121. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF SECURITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE FACILITIES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act 

(50 U.S.C. 2657) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘SEC. 4506. ANNUAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON STATUS OF SECURITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE FACILITIES. 

‘‘(a) REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE.—(1) Not later than September 30 of each year, the Administrator shall submit to the Secretary of Energy— 

‘‘(A) a report detailing the status of security at facilities holding Category I and II quantities of special nuclear material that 

are administered by the Administration; and 

‘‘(B) written certification that such facilities are secure and 

that the security measures at such facilities meet the security 

standards and requirements of the Administration and the Department of Energy. 

‘‘(2) If the Administrator is unable to make the certification described in paragraph (1)(B) with respect to a facility, the Administrator shall submit to the Secretary with the matters required by 

paragraph (1) a corrective action plan for the facility describing— 

‘‘(A) the deficiency that resulted in the Administrator being 

unable to make the certification; 

‘‘(B) the actions to be taken to correct the deficiency; and 

‘‘(C) timelines for taking such actions. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
398 

‘‘(3) Not later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees the unaltered report, 

certification, and any corrective action plans submitted by the Administrator under paragraphs (1) and (2) together with any comments of the Secretary. 

‘‘(b) REPORT AND CERTIFICATION ON ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE

FACILITIES NOT ADMINISTERED BY THE ADMINISTRATION.—(1) Not 

later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary shall submit to 

the congressional defense committees— 

‘‘(A) a report detailing the status of the security of atomic energy defense facilities holding Category I and II quantities of 

special nuclear material that are not administered by the Administration; and 

‘‘(B) written certification that such facilities meet the security 

standards and requirements of the Department of Energy. 

‘‘(2) If the Secretary is unable to make the certification described 

in paragraph (1)(B) with respect to a facility, the Secretary shall 

submit to the congressional defense committees, together with the 

matters required by paragraph (1), a corrective action plan describing— 

‘‘(A) the deficiency that resulted in the Secretary being unable 

to make the certification; 

‘‘(B) the actions to be taken to correct the deficiency; and 

‘‘(C) timelines for taking such actions.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the Atomic 

Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4506 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4506. Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy defense facilities.’’. 

SEC. 3122. MODIFICATIONS TO ANNUAL REPORTS REGARDING THE 

CONDITION OF THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE. 

(a) REPORT ON ASSESSMENTS.—Subsection (e) of section 4205 of 

the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a semicolon; 

(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(E) a concise summary of any significant finding investigations initiated or active during the previous year for 

which the head of the national security laboratory has full 

or partial responsibility.’’; and 

(2) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows: 

‘‘(4) In the case of a report submitted by the Commander of 

the United States Strategic Command— 

‘‘(A) a discussion of the relative merits of other nuclear 

weapon types (if any), or compensatory measures (if any) 

that could be taken, that could enable accomplishment of 

the missions of the nuclear weapon types to which the assessments relate, should such assessments identify any deficiency with respect to such nuclear weapon types; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
399 

‘‘(B) a summary of all major assembly releases in place 

as of the date of the report for the active and inactive nuclear weapon stockpiles.’’. 

(b) REPORTS SUBMITTED TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS.— 

Subsection (f) of such section is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘March 1’’ and inserting 

‘‘February 1’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) If the President does not forward to Congress the matters required under paragraph (2) by the date required by such paragraph, the officials specified in subsection (b) shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees not later than March 30 

on the report such officials submitted to the Secretary concerned 

under subsection (e).’’. 

SEC. 3123. INCLUSION OF INTEGRATED PLUTONIUM STRATEGY IN NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN. 

Section 4203(d) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2523(d)) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph (6): 

‘‘(6) A strategy for the integrated management of plutonium 

for stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs over a 20-year period that includes the following: 

‘‘(A) An assessment of the baseline science issues necessary to understand plutonium aging under static and dynamic conditions under manufactured and nonmanufactured plutonium geometries. 

‘‘(B) An assessment of scientific and testing instrumentation for plutonium at elemental and bulk conditions. 

‘‘(C) An assessment of manufacturing and handling technology for plutonium and plutonium components. 

‘‘(D) An assessment of computational models of plutonium performance under static and dynamic loading, including manufactured and nonmanufactured conditions. 

‘‘(E) An identification of any capability gaps with respect 

to the assessments described in subparagraphs (A) through 

(D). 

‘‘(F) An estimate of costs relating to the issues, instrumentation, technology, and models described in subparagraphs (A) through (D) over the period covered by the future-years nuclear security program under section 3253 of 

the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 

U.S.C. 2453). 

‘‘(G) An estimate of the cost of eliminating the capability 

gaps identified under subparagraph (E) over the period 

covered by the future-years nuclear security program. 

‘‘(H) Such other items as the Administrator considers important for the integrated management of plutonium for 

stockpile and stockpile stewardship needs.’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
400 

SEC. 3124. MODIFICATIONS TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS. 

(a) ANALYSES OF BID PROTESTS.—Subsection (a) of section 3121 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2175) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(a) REPORTS REQUIRED.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

described in subsection (b) by not later than 30 days after the later 

of— 

‘‘(1) the date on which the Administrator awards a contract 

to manage and operate a facility of the National Nuclear Security Administration; or 

‘‘(2) the date on which a protest concerning an alleged violation of a procurement statute or regulation brought under subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31, United States Code, with respect to such a contract is resolved.’’. 

(b) REPORTING ON EXPECTED COST SAVINGS.—Subsection (b)(1) of 

such section is amended by inserting ‘‘, including a description of 

the assumptions used and analysis conducted to determine such expected cost savings’’ before the semicolon. 

(c) REVIEW BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.— Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(c) REVIEW BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED

STATES.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 

Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the 

congressional defense committees a review of each report required by subsection (a) or (d)(2) not later than 180 days after 

the report is submitted to such committees. 

‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The Comptroller General may not conduct 

a review under paragraph (1) of a report relating to a contract 

to manage and operate a facility of the National Nuclear Security Administration while a protest described in subsection 

(a)(2) is pending with respect to that contract.’’. 

(d) EXCEPTION FOR NAVAL REACTORS.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) NAVAL REACTORS.—The requirement for reports under 

subsections (a) and (d)(2) shall not apply with respect to a management and operations contract for a Naval Reactor facility.’’. 

SEC. 3125. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES FOR CERTAIN REPORTS RELATING TO PROGRAM ON SCIENTIFIC ENGAGEMENT FOR 

NONPROLIFERATION. 

Section 3122 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2176; 50 U.S.C. 2562 

note) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘, and to the Comptroller 

General of the United States,’’ after ‘‘the appropriate congressional committees’’; 

(2) in subsection (c)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘15’’ and inserting ‘‘30’’; 

(B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 

paragraph (3): 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
401 

‘‘(3) WAIVER.—The Administrator may waive the requirement 

under paragraph (1) to submit a report on a modification in the 

program under subsection (a) not later than 30 days before 

making the modification if the Administrator— 

‘‘(A) determines that the modification is urgent and necessary to the national security interests of the United 

States; and 

‘‘(B) not later than 30 days after making the modification, submits to the appropriate congressional committees— 

‘‘(i) the report on the modification required by paragraph (1); and 

‘‘(ii) a justification for exercising the waiver authority 

under this paragraph.’’; and 

(D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘The report under paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘Each report submitted under paragraph (1) or 

(3)(B)’’; and 

(3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking ‘‘two years after the date 

of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘18 months after the 

date of the submittal of the report described in subsection 

(b)(1)’’. 

SEC. 3126. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN REPORTS ON COST CONTAINMENT FOR URANIUM CAPABILITIES REPLACEMENT 

PROJECT. 

Section 3123(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2178) is amended— 

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘QUARTERLY’’; 

(2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new 

paragraph (1): 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United 

States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a 

report on the project referred to in subsection (a)— 

‘‘(A) not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 90 days thereafter through the 

date that is one year after such date of enactment; and 

‘‘(B) after the date that is one year after such date of enactment, at such times as the Comptroller General, in consultation with the congressional defense committees, determines appropriate, taking into consideration the critical decision points of the project (as defined in orders of the Department of Energy).’’; and 

(3) in paragraph (2)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and the progress on 

meeting the requirements of section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2753)’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘programmatic’’. 

SEC. 3127. PLAN FOR TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle D of title XLIV of the Atomic Energy 

Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2621 et seq.) is amended by adding at the 

end the following new section: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
402 

‘‘SEC. 4445. PLAN FOR TANK FARM WASTE AT HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION. 

‘‘(a) PLAN.—Not later than June 1, 2014, the Secretary of Energy 

shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the 

initial activities (as defined in subsection (d)) for the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant and any related, required infrastructure facilities. 

‘‘(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The plan under subsection (a) shall include the following: 

‘‘(1) A list of significant requirements needed for the initial 

activities. 

‘‘(2) A schedule of significant activities needed to carry out the 

initial activities. 

‘‘(3) Actions required to accelerate, to the extent possible, the 

treatment of lower risk, low-activity waste while continuing efforts to resolve the technical challenges associated with higher 

risk, high-activity waste. 

‘‘(4) A description of how the Secretary will— 

‘‘(A) provide adequate protection to workers and the public under the plan; and 

‘‘(B) incorporate into the plan any significant new science 

and technical information that was not available before the 

development of the plan. 

‘‘(c) DETERMINATIONS.—(1) For each significant requirement identified by the Secretary under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary shall 

include in the plan submitted under subsection (a) a determination 

regarding whether such requirement is finalized and will be used 

to inform the initial activities. 

‘‘(2) For each significant requirement that the Secretary cannot 

make a finalized determination for under paragraph (1) by the date 

on which the plan under subsection (a) is submitted to the congressional defense committees, the Secretary shall— 

‘‘(A) include in the plan— 

‘‘(i) a description of the requirement; 

‘‘(ii) a list of significant activities required to finalize the 

requirement; and 

‘‘(iii) the date on which the Secretary anticipates making 

such determination; and 

‘‘(B) once the Secretary makes a determination that such a 

significant requirement is finalized, submit to such committees 

notification that the requirement is finalized and will be used 

to inform the initial activities. 

‘‘(3)(A) Notwithstanding any determination made under paragraph (1) with respect to a significant requirement identified by the 

Secretary under subsection (b)(1)— 

‘‘(i) the Secretary shall change a requirement if necessary to 

provide adequate protection to workers and the public; and 

‘‘(ii) the Secretary may change a requirement if the Secretary 

determines such change is necessary. 

‘‘(B) If the Secretary authorizes a change to a requirement under 

subparagraph (A) that will have a significant material effect on the 

schedule or cost of the initial activities, the Secretary shall promptly 

notify the congressional defense committees of such change. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
403 

‘‘(C) The authority of the Secretary under this paragraph may be 

delegated only to the Deputy Secretary of Energy. 

‘‘(d) INITIAL ACTIVITIES DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘initial activities’ means activities necessary to start the operations of 

the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant at the Hanford 

Tank Farms of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington, with respect to the design, construction, and operating of the 

Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant and any related, required infrastructure facilities.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the Atomic 

Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating 

to section 4444 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4445. Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.’’. 

SEC. 3128. PLAN FOR IMPROVEMENT AND INTEGRATION OF FINANCIAL 

MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall 

develop a plan for improving and integrating the financial management of the nuclear security enterprise. 

(b) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The plan required by subsection 

(a) shall include the following: 

(1) An assessment of the expected results of the plan. 

(2) An assessment of the feasibility of the plan. 

(3) The estimated costs of carrying out the plan. 

(4) A timeline for implementation of the plan. 

(c) CONSIDERATIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN.—In developing 

the plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider 

the following: 

(1) Efforts to improve the structure for the allocation of work 

to be used by the entities within the nuclear security enterprise 

for the activities carried out by those entities. 

(2) Efforts to develop a clear and consistent cost structure for 

each program and entity within the nuclear security enterprise. 

(3) Methodologies for identifying costs for programs of record 

and base capabilities required for programs carried out by the 

nuclear security enterprise. 

(4) Mechanisms for monitoring those programs during the 

execution of those programs and to provide data to inform oversight of those programs. 

(5) Reporting frameworks to be used by the entities within the 

nuclear security enterprise to facilitate analyses, projections, 

and comparisons of similar activities carried out by different 

programs across the nuclear security enterprise. 

(6) Effects of the plan on the facilities and management and 

operating contractors of the nuclear security enterprise. 

(d) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—The Administrator shall submit 

the plan required by subsection (a) to the congressional defense committees not later than one year after the date of the enactment of 

this Act. 

(e) NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE DEFINED.—In this section, the 

term ‘‘nuclear security enterprise’’ has the meaning given that term 

in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
404 

SEC. 3129. PLAN FOR DEVELOPING EXASCALE COMPUTING AND INCORPORATING SUCH COMPUTING INTO THE STOCKPILE 

STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM. 

(a) PLAN REQUIRED.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security 

shall develop and carry out a plan to develop exascale computing 

and incorporate such computing into the stockpile stewardship program under section 4201 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 

U.S.C. 2521) during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the 

enactment of this Act. 

(b) MILESTONES.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include major programmatic milestones in— 

(1) the development of a prototype exascale computer for the 

stockpile stewardship program; and 

(2) mitigating disruptions resulting from the transition to 

exascale computing. 

(c) COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES.—In developing the 

plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall coordinate, 

as appropriate, with the Under Secretary of Energy for Science, the 

Secretary of Defense, and elements of the intelligence community (as 

defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

U.S.C. 3003(4))). 

(d) INCLUSION OF COSTS IN FUTURE-YEARS NUCLEAR SECURITY

PROGRAM.—The Administrator shall— 

(1) address, in the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations reflected in each future-years nuclear security program submitted under section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2453) during the 10-year 

period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

costs of— 

(A) developing exascale computing and incorporating 

such computing into the stockpile stewardship program; 

and 

(B) mitigating potential disruptions resulting from the 

transition to exascale computing; and 

(2) include in each such future-years nuclear security program a description of the costs of efforts to develop exascale 

computing borne by the National Nuclear Security Administration, the Office of Science of the Department of Energy, other 

Federal agencies, and private industry. 

(e) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—The Administrator shall submit 

the plan required by subsection (a) to the congressional defense committees with each summary of the plan required by subsection (a) 

of section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523) 

submitted under subsection (b)(1) of that section during the 10-year 

period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(f) EXASCALE COMPUTING DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

‘‘exascale computing’’ means computing through the use of a computing machine that performs near or above 10 to the 18th power 

floating point operations per second. 

SEC. 3130. STUDY AND PLAN FOR EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PILOT PROGRAM PRINCIPLES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall 

conduct a study of the feasibility of, and develop a plan for, extending the principles of the pilot program to improve and streamline 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
405 

oversight of the Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, Missouri, initiated 

on or about April 2006, to additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise. 

(b) ELEMENTS.—The study and plan required by subsection (a) 

shall address the following: 

(1) The applicability of all or some of the principles of the 

pilot program to additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise. 

(2) The costs, benefits, risks, opportunities, and cost 

avoidances that may result from the extension of the principles 

of the pilot program to additional facilities. 

(3) The cost avoidances that have been realized from the pilot 

program described in subsection (a) since the pilot program was 

initiated. 

(4) The actions and timelines that would be required to extend the principles of the pilot program to additional facilities 

if the Administrator determines that extending such principles 

is feasible. 

(c) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following: 

(1) The results of the study and the plan required by subsection (a). 

(2) The determination of the Administrator regarding whether the principles of the pilot program will be extended to additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise. 

(d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional committees’’ means 

the following: 

(A) The congressional defense committees. 

(B) The Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of 

the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of 

the House of Representatives. 

(2) The term ‘‘nuclear security enterprise’’ has the meaning 

given that term in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2501). 

(3) The term ‘‘principles of the pilot program’’ means the principles regarding the use of third-party certification, industrial 

standards, best business practices, and verification of internal 

procedures and performance to improve and streamline oversight, as demonstrated in the pilot program at the Kansas City 

Plant described in subsection (a). 

SEC. 3131. STUDY OF POTENTIAL REUSE OF NUCLEAR WEAPON 

SECONDARIES. 

(a) STUDY.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall conduct a study of the potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries 

that includes an assessment of the potential for reusing secondaries 

in future life extension programs, including— 

(1) a description of which secondaries could be reused; 

(2) the number of such secondaries available in the stockpile 

as of the date of the study; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
406 

(3) the number of such secondaries that are planned to be 

available after such date as a result of the dismantlement of 

nuclear weapons. 

(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The study under subsection (a) shall include the following: 

(1) The feasibility and practicability of potential full or partial reuse options with respect to nuclear weapon secondaries. 

(2) The benefits and risks of reusing such secondaries. 

(3) A list of technical challenges that must be resolved to certify aged materials under dynamic loading conditions and the 

full stockpile-to-target sequence of weapons, including a program plan and timeline for resolving such technical challenges 

and an assessment of the importance of resolving outstanding 

materials issues on certifying aged secondaries. 

(4) The potential costs and cost savings of such reuse. 

(5) The effects of such reuse on the requirements for 

secondaries manufacturing. 

(6) An assessment of how such reuse affects plans to build a 

responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure. 

(c) SUBMISSION.—Not later than March 1, 2014, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees the 

study under subsection (a). 

SEC. 3132. REPEAL OF CERTAIN REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) REPORT ON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY PRACTICES

AT NATIONAL SECURITY LABORATORIES.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 4507 of the Atomic Energy Defense 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2658) is repealed. 

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the 

Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 4507. 

(b) REPORTS ON ADVANCED SUPERCOMPUTER SALES TO CERTAIN

FOREIGN NATIONS.—Section 3157 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 50 U.S.C. 

App. 2404 note) is repealed. 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

SEC. 3141. CLARIFICATION OF ROLE OF SECRETARY OF ENERGY. 

The amendment made by section 3113 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 

Stat. 2169) to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 

U.S.C. 2512) may not be construed as affecting the authority of the 

Secretary of Energy, in carrying out national security programs, 

with respect to the management, planning, and oversight of the National Nuclear Security Administration or as affecting the delegation by the Secretary of authority to carry out such activities, as set 

forth under subsection (a) of such section 4102 as it existed before 

the amendment made by such section 3113. 

SEC. 3142. MODIFICATION OF DEADLINES FOR CONGRESSIONAL ADVISORY PANEL ON THE GOVERNANCE OF THE NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE. 

Section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2208) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
407 

(1) in subsection (d)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘March 1, 

2014’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘February 1, 2014’’ and 

inserting ‘‘July 1, 2014’’; and 

(2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘June 1, 2014’’ and inserting 

‘‘September 30, 2014’’. 

SEC. 3143. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LAND CONVEYANCE. 

(a) CONSOLIDATION OF TITLE TO BANNISTER FEDERAL COMPLEX.— 

Notwithstanding sections 521 and 522 of title 40, United States 

Code, the Administrator of General Services may transfer custody of 

and accountability for the portion of the real property described in 

subsection (b) in the custody of the General Services Administration 

on the date of the enactment of this Act to the National Nuclear Security Administration. 

(b) REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The real property described in this subsection is the real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of the Bannister Federal Complex in Kansas City, 

Missouri. 

(2) FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 

and legal description of the real property described in this subsection shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Administrator of General Services. 

(c) AUTHORITIES RELATING TO CONVEYANCE OF BANNISTER FEDERAL COMPLEX.—After the consolidation of custody of and accountability for the real property described in subsection (b) in the National Nuclear Security Administration under subsection (a), the 

Administrator for Nuclear Security may— 

(1) negotiate an agreement to convey to an eligible entity all 

right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real 

property described in subsection (b); and 

(2) enter into an agreement, on a reimbursable basis or otherwise, with the eligible entity to provide funding for the costs 

of— 

(A) the negotiation of the agreement described in paragraph (1); 

(B) planning for the disposition of the property; and 

(C) carrying out the responsibilities of the Administrator 

under section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 

U.S.C. 9620(h)) with respect to the property, including— 

(i) identification, investigation, and clean up of, and 

research and development with respect to, contamination from a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant; 

(ii) correction of other environmental damage that 

creates an imminent and substantial endangerment to 

the public health or welfare or to the environment; and 

(iii) demolition and removal of buildings and structures as required to clean up contamination or as reVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00439 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
408 

quired for completion of the responsibilities of the Administrator under that section. 

(d) LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) PRICE.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall select, through a public process provided for under the regulations of the Department of Energy, the eligible entity to which 

the real property described in subsection (b) is to be conveyed 

under subsection (c). The Administrator shall use good faith efforts to ensure the greatest possible return on such conveyance 

considering the conditions described in paragraphs (2) and (3). 

(2) CONDITION ON CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance under subsection (c) shall be subject to the requirements relating to transfer of property by the Federal Government under section 120(h) 

of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 

and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)). 

(3) OCCUPANCY BY NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION.—The conveyance under subsection (c) shall be 

subject to the condition that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may continue to occupy until December 

31, 2015, the space in the real property described in subsection 

(b) that the Administration occupies as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

(e) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.— 

(1) REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall use any funds received from 

the conveyance under subsection (c) to reimburse the Administrator for costs (other than costs referred to in paragraph (2) of 

that subsection) incurred by the Administrator to carry out the 

conveyance, including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the 

conveyance. 

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as 

reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the 

fund or account that was used to cover the costs referred to in 

that paragraph. Amounts so credited shall be merged with 

amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the 

same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account. 

(f) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The Administrator for 

Nuclear Security may require such additional terms and conditions 

in connection with the conveyance under subsection (c) as the Administrator considers appropriate to protect the interests of the 

United States. 

(g) ELIGIBLE ENTITY DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘eligible 

entity’’ means a nongovernmental entity that has demonstrated to 

the Administrator for Nuclear Security, in the Administrator’s sole 

discretion, that the entity has the capability to operate and maintain the real property described in subsection (b). 

SEC. 3144. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954. 

Chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131 et 

seq.), as amended by section 3176 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 

2215), is amended in the matter following section 111 by inserting 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
409 

before ‘‘a. The Commission’’ the following: ‘‘Sec. 112. DOMESTIC

MEDICAL ISOTOPE PRODUCTION.—’’. 

SEC. 3145. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ACT. 

(a) ADMINISTRATOR FOR NUCLEAR SECURITY.—Section 3212(c) of 

the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 

2402(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code’’. 

(b) STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION AND CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL.— Section 3220 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2410) is amended in subsection 

(a)(1)(A) and subsection (b) by inserting ‘‘(42 U.S.C. 7132(c)(3))’’ 

after ‘‘section 202(c)(3) of the Department of Energy Organization 

Act’’. 

(c) GOVERNMENT ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND COMPUTERS.— Section 3235(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2425(b)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(Public Law 99–508; 100 Stat. 1848)’’ after ‘‘of 1986’’. 

(d) AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN POSITIONS.—Section 3241 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2441) is amended in the last sentence— 

(1) by striking ‘‘excepted positions established’’ and inserting 

‘‘positions established’’; 

(2) by striking ‘‘an excepted position’’ and inserting ‘‘a position’’; and 

(3) by striking ‘‘nonexcepted position’’ and inserting ‘‘position 

not established under this section’’. 

(e) SEPARATE TREATMENT IN BUDGET.—Section 3251(a) of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2451(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(f) FUTURE-YEARS NUCLEAR SECURITY PROGRAM.—Section 

3253(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2453(b)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘five-fiscal year’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘five-fiscal-year’’; 

(2) by striking paragraph (5) and by redesignating paragraph 

(6) as paragraph (5); and 

(3) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (5), as redesignated by 

paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘National Nuclear Security’’. 

(g) COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION.—Section 3262 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2462) is amended by striking ‘‘the 

Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et seq.)’’ 

and inserting ‘‘section 1303(a)(1) of title 41, United States Code’’. 

(h) USE OF CAPABILITIES OF NATIONAL SECURITY LABORA- TORIES.—Section 3264 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2464) is amended by 

inserting ‘‘of Energy’’ after ‘‘Secretary’’. 

(i) DEFINITIONS.—Section 3281(2)(F) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2471(2)(F)) is amended by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and inserting 

‘‘Congress’’. 

(j) FUNCTIONS TRANSFERRED.—Section 3291(d)(1) of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2481(d)(1)) is amended by moving the flush text after subparagraph (B) 2 ems to the left. 

SEC. 3146. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACT. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2501) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
410 

(A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘In 

this division’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as otherwise provided, 

in this division’’; 

(B) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8) as 

paragraphs (6), (7), (9), and (10), respectively; 

(C) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new 

paragraph (5): 

‘‘(5) The terms ‘defense nuclear facility’ and ‘Department of 

Energy defense nuclear facility’ have the meaning given the 

term ‘Department of Energy defense nuclear facility’ in section 

318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286g).’’; 

(D) by inserting after paragraph (7), as redesignated by 

subparagraph (B), the following new paragraph (8): 

‘‘(8) The term ‘Nuclear Weapons Council’ means the Nuclear 

Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United 

States Code.’’; and 

(E) in paragraph (10), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘restricted data’’ and inserting ‘‘Restricted 

Data’’. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

(A) NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP PLAN.— Section 4203(e)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(e)(1)) is 

amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by 

striking ‘‘established by section 179 of title 10, United 

States Code,’’. 

(B) REPORTS ON LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAMS.—Section 

4216(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2536(a)) is amended in the 

matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘established by 

section 179 of title 10, United States Code,’’. 

(C) SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORTS.—Section 4217(b)(1) 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)(1)) is amended in the matter 

preceding subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘established under 

section 179 of title 10, United States Code,’’. 

(D) ADVICE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.—Section 

4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is amended— 

(i) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘Joint’’; and 

(ii) in subsection (f)(1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘established under section 

179 of title 10, United States Code’’. 

(E) REPORTS ON PERMANENT CLOSURES OF DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES.—Section 4422(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2602(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘(as defined in section 318 

of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286(g))’’. 

(F) PROHIBITION ON INTERNATIONAL INSPECTIONS.—Section 4501(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended by 

striking ‘‘restricted data’’ and inserting ‘‘Restricted Data’’. 

(G) REVIEW OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BEFORE DECLAS- SIFICATION AND RELEASE.—Section 4521 of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2671) is amended by striking ‘‘restricted data’’ each 

place it appears and inserting ‘‘Restricted Data’’. 

(H) PROTECTION AGAINST INADVERTENT RELEASE OF RE- STRICTED DATA AND FORMERLY RESTRICTED DATA.—Section 

4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended by striking 

subsection (g). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
411 

(I) DEFINITIONS.—Section 4701 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2741) is amended— 

(i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2). 

(J) PROHIBITION AND REPORT ON BONUSES TO CONTRAC- TORS.—Section 4802 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2782) is 

amended— 

(i) by striking subsection (b); and 

(ii) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b). 

(K) TRANSFERS OF REAL PROPERTY.—Section 4831(f) of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2811(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘section:’’ and all that follows through ‘‘(2) The terms’’ and inserting ‘‘section, the terms’’. 

(b) RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN LICENSING REQUIREMENT.—Section 

4103 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2513) is amended by inserting ‘‘; 94 

Stat. 3197’’ after ‘‘Public Law 96–540’’. 

(c) NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE MATTERS.— 

(1) STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 4201 of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2521) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph 

(1), by striking ‘‘for Nuclear Security’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (4)(D), by striking ‘‘Nevada national 

security site’’ and inserting ‘‘Nevada National Security 

Site’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (5)— 

(I) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (D) 

and inserting the following new subparagraph (A): 

‘‘(A) the nuclear weapons production facilities; and’’; and 

(II) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (B). 

(2) STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.—Section 4204(a) of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2524(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘for Nuclear Security’’. 

(3) ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCK- PILE.—Section 4205 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2525) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (c), in the matter preceding paragraph 

(1), by striking ‘‘for Nuclear Security’’; and 

(B) in subsection (h)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘DEFINITIONS’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFINITION’’; 

(ii) by striking ‘‘section:’’ and all that follows through 

‘‘(2) The term’’ and inserting ‘‘section, the term’’; and 

(iii) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as 

paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and by moving 

such paragraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the left. 

(4) NUCLEAR TEST BAN READINESS PROGRAM.—Section 4207 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2527) is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (a); 

(B) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (a), (b), and (c), respectively; 

(C) in subsection (a), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘Soviet Union’’ and inserting ‘‘Russian Federation’’; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
412 

(D) in subsection (b), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘subsection (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection 

(a)’’; and 

(E) in subsection (c), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘subsection (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘national nuclear weapons laboratories’’ and inserting ‘‘national security laboratories’’. 

(5) REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC REQUEST FOR NEW OR MODI- FIED NUCLEAR WEAPONS.—Section 4209(d) of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2529(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘the date of the enactment of this Act’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘December 

2, 2002’’. 

(6) MANUFACTURING INFRASTRUCTURE.—Section 4212 of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2532) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘Review’’ and inserting ‘‘Memorandum’’; and 

(B) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(7) REPORTS ON CRITICAL DIFFICULTIES.—Section 4213 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2533) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘PLANTS’’ 

and inserting ‘‘FACILITIES’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘plant’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘facility’’; and 

(B) in subsection (d)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘CERTIFICATION’’ and inserting ‘‘ASSESSMENT’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘included with the decision documents’’ and all that follows through ‘‘the President’’ 

and inserting ‘‘submitted to the President and Congress 

with the matters required to be submitted under section 

4205(f)’’. 

(8) PLAN FOR TRANSFORMATION OF NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTER- PRISE.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Section 4214 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2534) 

is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4214. 

(9) REPLACEMENT PROJECT FOR CHEMISTRY AND METALLURGY

RESEARCH BUILDING.—Section 4215(d)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2535(d)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘National Nuclear Security’’. 

(10) ADVICE ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE.—Section 4218 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538), as amended by subsection 

(a)(2)(D), is further amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (a); 

(B) by redesignating subsections (b) through (g) as subsections (a) through (f), respectively; and 

(C) in subsection (d), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(B), by striking ‘‘(under section 3159 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
413 

104–201; 42 U.S.C. 7274o))’’ and inserting ‘‘under section 

4213’’. 

(11) TRITIUM PRODUCTION PROGRAM.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 4233 of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2543) is— 

(i) transferred to the end of section 4231 (50 U.S.C. 

2541); and 

(ii) redesignated as subsection (c). 

(B) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 4233 of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2543) is repealed. 

(C) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4233. 

(d) PROLIFERATION MATTERS.— 

(1) NONPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES AND ACTIVITIES.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Section 4302 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2562) 

is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4302. 

(2) NUCLEAR CITIES INITIATIVE.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Section 4304 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2564) 

is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4304. 

(e) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.— 

(1) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP ACCOUNT.—Section 

4401 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2581) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘RESTORATION

AND WASTE MANAGEMENT’’ and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Restoration and Waste 

Management’’ and inserting ‘‘Cleanup’’; and 

(C) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’. 

(2) FUTURE USE PLANS FOR DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.—Section 4402 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2582) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’; 

(C) in subsection (b)— 

(i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively; 

(D) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘for program direction 

in carrying out environmental restoration and waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘for defense environmental cleanup’’; 

(E) by striking subsection (f); 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
414 

(F) by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and 

(G) in paragraph (2) of subsection (g), as redesignated by 

subparagraph (F)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘an environmental restoration or waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘a defense environmental 

cleanup’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup’’. 

(3) FUTURE-YEARS DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

PLAN.—Section 4402A of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2582A) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘MANAGEMENT’’ 

and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking 

‘‘management’’ and inserting ‘‘cleanup’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘environmental 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup’’; and 

(C) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘management’’ each 

place it appears and inserting ‘‘cleanup’’. 

(4) INTEGRATED FISSILE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN.—Section 4403 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2583) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a)(1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘the Office of Fissile Materials Disposition, the Office of Nuclear Energy, and the Office of Defense Programs’’ and inserting ‘‘the Office of Nuclear 

Energy, and the Administration’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘storage’’ and inserting ‘‘storage,’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘March 31, 2000’’ and 

inserting ‘‘March 31, 2014’’. 

(5) BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REPORTS.—Section 4404 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2584) is repealed. 

(6) ACCELERATED SCHEDULE FOR DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL

CLEANUP ACTIVITIES.—Section 4405 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2585) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL

RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT’’ and inserting 

‘‘DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’; 

(C) in subsection (b)— 

(i) by striking paragraph (2); and 

(ii) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as 

paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively; 

(D) by striking subsection (c); 

(E) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c); and 

(F) in subsection (c), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(E)— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
415 

(i) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration or waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental 

cleanup’’. 

(7) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.—Section 4406 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2586) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘WASTE’’ and inserting ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL’’; 

(B) by striking subsections (b) and (c); and 

(C) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (b). 

(8) REPORT ON DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP EXPENDITURES.—Section 4407 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2587) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL

RESTORATION’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL

CLEANUP’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste 

management funds for defense activities’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup funds’’. 

(9) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PLANNING FOR DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.—Section 4408 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2588) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL

RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘Attorneys General’’ and inserting ‘‘attorneys general’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup activities’’. 

(10) PROJECTS TO ACCELERATE CLOSURE ACTIVITIES.—Section 

4421 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2601) is repealed. 

(11) REPORTS IN CONNECTION WITH CLOSURES.—Section 4422 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2602) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), as amended by subsection 

(a)(2)(E)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘must’’ and inserting ‘‘shall’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘environmental remediation and 

cleanup’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and other remediation and cleanup efforts’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup activities’’. 

(12) DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRIVATIZATION

PROJECTS.—Subtitle C of title XLIV of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2611) is repealed. 

(13) HANFORD WASTE TANK CLEANUP PROGRAM.—Section 

4442(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2622(b)(2)) is amended by 

striking ‘‘responsible for’’ and all that follows through ‘‘aspects’’ 

and inserting ‘‘responsible for managing all aspects’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
416 

(14) FUNDING FOR TERMINATION COSTS OF RIVER PROTECTION

PROJECT.—Section 4444(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2624(2)) is 

amended by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and waste 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’. 

(15) SAVANNAH RIVER SITE.—Subtitle E of title XLIV of such 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2631 et seq.) is amended by striking sections 

4453A, 4453B, 4453C, and 4453D. 

(16) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title XLIV of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2581 et seq.) is amended— 

(A) in the title heading, by striking ‘‘ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT’’ and inserting ‘‘DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL 

CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in the subtitle heading for subtitle A, by striking ‘‘Environmental Restoration and Waste Management’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Defense Environmental Cleanup’’; and 

(C) by redesignating subtitles D and E as subtitles C and 

D, respectively. 

(17) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for such 

Act is amended by striking the items relating to title XLIV and 

inserting the following new items: 

‘‘TITLE XLIV—DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP MATTERS 

‘‘Subtitle A—Defense Environmental Cleanup 

‘‘Sec. 4401. Defense Environmental Cleanup Account. 

‘‘Sec. 4402. Requirement to develop future use plans for defense environmental 

cleanup. 

‘‘Sec. 4402A. Future-years defense environmental cleanup plan. 

‘‘Sec. 4403. Integrated fissile materials management plan. 

‘‘Sec. 4405. Accelerated schedule for defense environmental cleanup activities. 

‘‘Sec. 4406. Defense environmental cleanup technology program. 

‘‘Sec. 4407. Report on defense environmental cleanup expenditures. 

‘‘Sec. 4408. Public participation in planning for defense environmental cleanup. 

‘‘Subtitle B—Closure of Facilities 

‘‘Sec. 4422. Reports in connection with permanent closures of Department of Energy 

defense nuclear facilities. 

‘‘Subtitle C—Hanford Reservation, Washington 

‘‘Sec. 4441. Safety measures for waste tanks at Hanford nuclear reservation. 

‘‘Sec. 4442. Hanford waste tank cleanup program reforms. 

‘‘Sec. 4443. River Protection Project. 

‘‘Sec. 4444. Funding for termination costs of River Protection Project, Richland, 

Washington. 

‘‘Subtitle D—Savannah River Site, South Carolina 

‘‘Sec. 4451. Accelerated schedule for isolating high-level nuclear waste at the defense 

waste processing facility, Savannah River Site. 

‘‘Sec. 4452. Multi-year plan for clean-up. 

‘‘Sec. 4453. Continuation of processing, treatment, and disposal of legacy nuclear 

materials. 

‘‘Sec. 4454. Limitation on use of funds for decommissioning F–canyon facility.’’. 

(f) SAFEGUARDS AND SECURITY MATTERS.— 

(1) RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS TO NATIONAL SECURITY LABORA- TORIES.—Section 4502 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2652) is amended— 

(A) by striking subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e); 

(B) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 

(b) and (c), respectively; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
417 

(C) in paragraph (2) of subsection (c), as redesignated by 

subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘as in effect on January 1, 

1999’’. 

(2) COUNTERINTELLIGENCE POLYGRAPH PROGRAM.—Section 

4504 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2654) is amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (d); and 

(B) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d). 

(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS OF CERTAIN SECURITY AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FAILURES.—Section 4505(e)(2) of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2656(e)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(4) AMOUNTS FOR DECLASSIFICATION ACTIVITIES.—Section 

4525 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675) is amended by striking subsection (c). 

(5) RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEFENSE PROGRAMS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Subtitle C of title XLV of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2691) is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the items relating to subtitle C of title XLV. 

(g) PERSONNEL MATTERS.— 

(1) APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONNEL.—Section 4601(a) 

of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2701(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (4). 

(2) WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION PROGRAM.—Section 4602 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2702) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (l), by striking ‘‘Public Law 101–512’’ 

and inserting ‘‘Public Law 101–12; 103 Stat. 16’’; and 

(B) by striking subsection (n). 

(3) INCENTIVES FOR EMPLOYEES AT CLOSURE PROJECT FACILITIES.— 

(A) REPEAL.—Section 4603 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2703) 

is repealed. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4603. 

(4) WORKFORCE RESTRUCTURING PLACE.—Section 4604 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (c)(6)(A), by inserting ‘‘(29 U.S.C. 2801 

et seq.)’’ after ‘‘of 1998’’; and 

(B) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ‘‘the 236 H facility at 

Savannah River, South Carolina; and the Mound Laboratory, Ohio’’ and inserting ‘‘and the 236 H facility at Savannah River, South Carolina’’. 

(5) CERTIFICATES OF COMMENDATION.—Section 4605(b) of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2705(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘Cold War’’ 

and inserting ‘‘cold war’’. 

(6) EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TRAINING.—Section 4621(b)(6) of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2721(b)(6)) is amended by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and defense waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
418 

(7) STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP RECRUITMENT AND TRAINING

PROGRAM.—Section 4622 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2722) is 

amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Sandia’’ and all that 

follows through ‘‘Los Alamos National Laboratory’’ and inserting ‘‘national security laboratories’’; and 

(B) in subsections (b) and (c), by striking ‘‘laboratories referred to in subsection (a)(1)’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘national security laboratories’’. 

(8) FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 4623(b) of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2723(b)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph 

(1) by inserting ‘‘either of’’ after ‘‘who are’’. 

(9) WORKER PROTECTION.—Section 4641 of such Act (50 

U.S.C. 2731) is amended by striking subsection (e). 

(10) SAFETY OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT.—Section 4642 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2732) is amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘(a) SAFETY AT DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILI- TIES.—’’; and 

(B) by striking subsection (b). 

(11) MONITORING WORKERS EXPOSED TO HAZARDOUS AND RA- DIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES.—Section 4643 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2733) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘of Energy’’ after ‘‘Secretary’’; and 

(B) in subsection (b)— 

(i) in paragraph (2)(B)— 

(I) by inserting ‘‘and Prevention’’ after ‘‘Disease 

Control’’; and 

(II) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting a period; 

(ii) in paragraph (3)(C), by inserting ‘‘and Measurements’’ after ‘‘Radiation Protection’’; 

(iii) in paragraph (4)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(D)’’ and inserting 

‘‘paragraph (1)(B)’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(E)’’ and inserting 

‘‘paragraph (1)’’; and 

(iv) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)(E)’’ 

and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’. 

(12) PROGRAMS RELATING TO EXPOSURE ON HANFORD RESERVATION.—Section 4644(c) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2734(c)) is 

amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ each place it appears and 

inserting ‘‘Congress’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (4), by inserting ‘‘and Prevention’’ after 

‘‘Disease Control’’. 

(13) NOTIFICATION OF NUCLEAR CRITICALITY AND NON-NU- CLEAR INCIDENTS.—Section 4646(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2736(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘Energy and’’ and inserting 

‘‘Energy or’’. 

(h) BUDGET AND FINANCIAL MATTERS.— (1) REPROGRAMMING.—Section 4702(c) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2742(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (a)’’ and insert ‘‘this 

subsection’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
419 

(2) TRANSFER OF DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

FUNDS.—Section 4710 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750) is amended— 

(A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘MANAGEMENT’’ 

and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; 

(B) in subsection (a)— 

(i) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘MANAGEMENT’’ and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘management’’ and inserting ‘‘cleanup’’; and 

(C) in subsection (e)— 

(i) in paragraph (1)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration or 

waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘environmental management’’ 

and inserting ‘‘environmental cleanup’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (2)— 

(I) by striking ‘‘environmental management’’ and 

inserting ‘‘environmental cleanup’’; and 

(II) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration and 

waste management’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’. 

(3) TRANSFER OF WEAPONS ACTIVITIES FUNDS.—Section 

4711(d) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2751(d)) is amended by striking 

‘‘for Nuclear Security’’. 

(4) NOTIFICATION OF COST OVERRUNS.—Section 4713(a)(3) of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2753(a)(3)) is amended— 

(A) in the paragraph heading, by striking ‘‘MANAGEMENT’’ 

and inserting ‘‘CLEANUP’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘environmental 

management’’ and inserting ‘‘environmental cleanup’’. 

(5) USE OF FUNDS FOR PENALTIES UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL

LAWS.—Section 4721(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2761(b)(2)) is 

amended by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(6) RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS TO PAY CERTAIN PENALTIES.—Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762) is amended— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘; 94 Stat. 3197’’ after ‘‘Public Law 96– 

540’’; and 

(B) by striking ‘‘the Congress’’ and inserting ‘‘Congress’’. 

(i) ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS.— 

(1) COSTS NOT ALLOWED UNDER COVERED CONTRACTS.—Section 4801(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2781(b)(1)) is amended by 

striking ‘‘section 22 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy 

Act (41 U.S.C. 418b)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1707 of title 41, 

United States Code’’. 

(2) CONTRACTOR LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN INJURIES OR LOSS OF

PROPERTY.—Section 4803(b)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2783(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘by the Act of March 9, 1920 

(46 U.S.C. App. 741–752), or by the Act of March 3, 1925 (46 

U.S.C. App. 781–790)’’ and inserting ‘‘or by chapter 309 or 311 

of title 46, United States Code’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
420 

(3) USE OF FUNDS FOR LABORATORY-DIRECTED RESEARCH AND

DEVELOPMENT.—Section 4812 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2792) is 

amended— 

(A) by striking subsection (b); 

(B) by striking ‘‘GENERAL LIMITATIONS.—(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘LIMITATION ON USE OF WEAPONS ACTIVITIES FUNDS.— ’’; 

(C) by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON

USE OF CERTAIN OTHER FUNDS.—’’; and 

(D) in subsection (b), as redesignated by subparagraph 

(C)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration, waste 

management, or nuclear materials and facilities stabilization’’ and inserting ‘‘defense environmental cleanup’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘environmental restoration mission, 

waste management mission, or materials stabilization 

mission, as the case may be,’’ and inserting ‘‘defense 

environmental cleanup mission’’. 

(4) REPORT ON LABORATORY-DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVEL- OPMENT FUNDS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Section 4812A of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2793) is amended— 

(i) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘LIMITATION’’ 

and inserting ‘‘REPORT’’; 

(ii) by striking subsection (a); 

(iii) by striking ‘‘(b) ANNUAL REPORT.—(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) REPORT REQUIRED.—’’; 

(iv) by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b) PREPARATION

OF REPORT.—’’; and 

(v) by striking ‘‘(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(c) CRITERIA USED

IN PREPARATION OF REPORT.—’’. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4812A and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4812A. Report on use of funds for certain research and development purposes.’’. 

(5) CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS.—Section 4813 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794) is amended— 

(A) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘for Nuclear Security’’; and 

(B) in subsection (c)— 

(i) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (C) 

and inserting the following new subparagraph (C): 

‘‘(C) that is a defense critical technology (as defined in 

section 2500 of title 10, United States Code).’’; and 

(ii) in paragraph (3)(B)(iii), by striking ‘‘Governments’’ and inserting ‘‘governments’’. 

(6) CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF REAL PROPERTY.—Section 4831 of 

such Act (50 U.S.C. 2811), as amended by subsection (a)(2)(K), 

is further amended— 

(A) by striking ‘‘Secretary of Energy’’ each place it appears (other than in subsection (a)(1)) and inserting ‘‘Secretary’’; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
421 

(B) in subsection (d), in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘OF ENERGY’’. 

(7) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 4832 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 

2812) is amended in the section heading by striking ‘‘PLANT

MANAGERS OF CERTAIN NUCLEAR WEAPONS PRODUCTION

PLANTS’’ and inserting ‘‘MANAGERS OF CERTAIN NUCLEAR

WEAPONS PRODUCTION FACILITIES’’. 

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for 

such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 

4832 and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 4832. Engineering and manufacturing research, development, and demonstration by managers of certain nuclear weapons production facilities.’’. 

SEC. 3147. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON B61–12 LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM. 

It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) the B61–12 life extension program must be a high priority 

of the National Nuclear Security Administration; 

(2) the B61–12 life extension program must be given top priority in the budget of the Administration and, if necessary, 

funding should be shifted from other programs of the Administration to ensure that the B61–12 life extension program stays 

on schedule to begin delivering B61–12 nuclear bombs to the 

military by not later than fiscal year 2020; and 

(3) further delays to the B61–12 life extension program would 

undermine the credibility and reliability of the nuclear deterrent of the United States and the assurances provided to allies 

of the United States. 

SEC. 3148. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADVISORY 

BOARD ON TOXIC SUBSTANCES AND WORKER HEALTH. 

It is the sense of Congress that the President should establish an 

Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health, as described in the report of the Comptroller General of the United States 

titled ‘‘Energy Employees Compensation: Additional Independent 

Oversight and Transparency Would Improve Program’s Credibility’’, 

numbered GAO–10–302, to— 

(1) advise the President concerning the review and approval 

of the Department of Labor site exposure matrix; 

(2) conduct periodic peer reviews of, and approve, medical 

guidance for part E claims examiners with respect to the weighing of a claimant’s medical evidence; 

(3) obtain periodic expert review of evidentiary requirements 

for part B claims related to lung disease regardless of approval; 

(4) provide oversight over industrial hygienists, Department 

of Labor staff physicians, and Department of Labor’s consulting 

physicians and their reports to ensure quality, objectivity, and 

consistency; and 

(5) coordinate exchanges of data and findings with the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (under section 

3624 the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384o)) to the extent necessary. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
422 

TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR 

FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD 

Sec. 3201. Authorization. 

SEC. 3201. AUTHORIZATION. 

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014, 

$29,915,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

U.S.C. 2286 et seq.). 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM 

RESERVES 

Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations. 

SEC. 3401. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

(a) AMOUNT.—There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to 

the Secretary of Energy $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United 

States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves. 

(b) PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.—Funds appropriated pursuant to 

the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain 

available until expended. 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME 

ADMINISTRATION 

Sec. 3501. Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014. 

Sec. 3502. 5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program. 

Sec. 3503. Sense of Congress. 

Sec. 3504. Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility, Port 

of Anchorage, Alaska. 

Sec. 3505. Strategic seaports. 

SEC. 3501. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY ASPECTS OF THE MERCHANT MARINE FOR FISCAL 

YEAR 2014. 

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 

2014, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in 

appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transportation 

for Maritime Administration programs associated with maintaining 

national security aspects of the merchant marine, as follows: 

(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United States 

Merchant Marine Academy, $81,268,000, of which— 

(A) $67,268,000 shall remain available until expended 

for Academy operations; and 

(B) $14,000,000 shall remain available until expended 

for capital asset management at the Academy. 

(2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime 

academies, $17,100,000, of which— 

(A) $2,400,000 shall remain available until expended for 

student incentive payments; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
423 

(B) $3,600,000 shall remain available until expended for 

direct payments to such academies; and 

(C) $11,100,000 shall remain available until expended 

for maintenance and repair of State maritime academy 

training vessels. 

(3) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $2,000,000, to remain available 

until expended. 

(4) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United Statesflag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the 

United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, 

$186,000,000. 

(5) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal 

Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan guarantees 

under the program authorized by chapter 537 of title 46, United 

States Code, $72,655,000, of which $2,655,000 shall remain 

available until expended for administrative expenses of the program. 

SEC. 3502. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF VESSEL WAR RISK INSURANCE PROGRAM. 

Section 53912 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by 

striking ‘‘December 31, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2020’’. 

SEC. 3503. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

(1) It is in the interest of United States national security that 

the United States merchant marine, both ships and mariners, 

serve as a naval auxiliary in times of war or national emergency. 

(2) The readiness of the United States merchant fleet should 

be augmented by a Government-owned reserve fleet comprised 

of ships with national defense features that may not be available immediately in sufficient numbers or types in the active 

United States-owned, United States-flagged, and United Statescrewed commercial industry. 

(3) The Ready Reserve Force of the Maritime Administration, 

a component of the National Defense Reserve Fleet, plays an important role in United States national security by providing 

necessary readiness and efficiency in the form of a Governmentowned sealift fleet. 

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

(1) maintaining a United States shipbuilding base is critical 

to meeting United States national security requirements; 

(2) it is of vital importance that the Ready Reserve Force of 

the Maritime Administration remains capable, modern, and efficient in order to best serve the national security needs of the 

United States in times of war or national emergency; 

(3) Federal agencies must consider investment options for replacing aging vessels within the Ready Reserve Force to meet 

future operational commitments; 

(4) investment in recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force may 

include— 

(A) construction of dual-use vessels, based on need, for 

use in the America’s Marine Highway Program of the DeVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00455 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
424 

partment of Transportation, as a recent study performed 

under a cooperative agreement between the Maritime Administration and the Navy demonstrated that dual-use vessels transporting domestic freight between United States 

ports could be called upon to supplement sealift capacity; 

(B) construction of tanker vessels to meet military transport needs; and 

(C) construction of vessels for use in transporting potential new energy exports; and 

(5) the Department of Transportation, in consultation with 

the Navy, should pursue the most cost-effective means of recapitalizing the Ready Reserve Force, including by promoting the 

building of new vessels that are militarily useful and commercially viable. 

SEC. 3504. TREATMENT OF FUNDS FOR INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION MARITIME FACILITY, PORT OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA. 

Section 10205 of Public Law 109–59 (119 Stat. 1934) is amended 

by striking ‘‘shall’’ and inserting ‘‘may’’. 

SEC. 3505. STRATEGIC SEAPORTS. 

(a) PRIORITY.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Under the port infrastructure development 

program established under section 50302(c) of title 46, United 

States Code, the Maritime Administrator, in consultation with 

the Secretary of Defense, may give priority to providing funding 

to strategic seaports in support of national security requirements. 

(2) STRATEGIC SEAPORT DEFINED.—In this subsection the term 

‘‘strategic seaport’’ means a military port or and commercial 

port that is subject to a port planning order or Basic Ordering 

Agreement (or both) that is projected to be used for the deployment of forces and shipment of ammunition or sustainment 

supplies in support of military operations. 

(b) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—Section 50302(c)(2)(D) of title 46, 

United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘and financial assistance, including grants,’’ after ‘‘technical assistance’’. 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 

Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

Sec. 4101. Procurement. 

Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation. 

Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance. 

Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
425 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

Sec. 4401. Military personnel. 

Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

Sec. 4501. Other authorizations. 

Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations. 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

Sec. 4601. Military construction. 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

Sec. 4701. Department of energy national security programs. 

SEC. 4001. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS IN FUNDING TABLES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, 

the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the 

project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the 

availability of appropriations. 

(b) MERIT-BASED DECISIONS.—A decision to commit, obligate, or 

expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar 

amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall— 

(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 

10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and 

(2) comply with other applicable provisions of law. 

(c) RELATIONSHIP TO TRANSFER AND PROGRAMMING AUTHORITY.— An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be 

transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming 

authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. 

The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such 

funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers 

or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act 

or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts. 

(d) APPLICABILITY TO CLASSIFIED ANNEX.—This section applies to 

any classified annex that accompanies this Act. 

(e) ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.—No oral or written 

communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section. 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT. 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

FIXED WING 

001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT ................................................................ 19,730 19,730 

003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) ..................................... 142,050 85,050 

Reduction of EMARSS LRIP aircraft ........................................ [–57,000 ] 

004 MQ–1 UAV .......................................................................................... 518,460 518,460 

005 RQ–11 (RAVEN) ................................................................................. 10,772 10,772 

ROTARY 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
426 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

006 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) ......................................... 96,227 171,227 

Program increase for additional aircraft ................................... [75,000 ] 

007 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN ............................................ 608,469 608,469 

008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 150,931 150,931 

012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) ......................................... 1,046,976 1,032,915 

Transfer to PE 0203774A at Army request ................................ [–14,061 ] 

013 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 116,001 116,001 

014 CH–47 HELICOPTER ........................................................................ 801,650 801,650 

015 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 98,376 98,376 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

016 MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS ..................................................................... 97,781 97,781 

017 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) ............................................................... 10,262 10,262 

018 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ............................................. 12,467 12,467 

019 AH–64 MODS ...................................................................................... 53,559 53,559 

020 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) ................................. 149,764 149,764 

021 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS ............................................. 17,500 17,500 

022 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS ....................................................... 74,095 74,095 

023 KIOWA MODS WARRIOR ................................................................. 184,044 184,044 

024 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN ................................................... 152,569 152,569 

025 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE ..................................................... 92,779 92,779 

026 GATM ROLLUP .................................................................................. 65,613 65,613 

027 RQ–7 UAV MODS .............................................................................. 121,902 121,902 

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 

028 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .................................. 47,610 47,610 

029 SURVIVABILITY CM ........................................................................ 5,700 5,700 

030 CMWS .................................................................................................. 126,869 126,869 

OTHER SUPPORT 

031 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 6,809 6,809 

032 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ................................................. 65,397 65,397 

033 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS .............................................. 45,841 45,841 

034 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ................................................................. 79,692 79,692 

035 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .............................................................. 1,615 1,615 

036 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET .............................................................. 2,877 2,877 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................. 5,024,387 5,028,326 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 

002 MSE MISSILE .................................................................................... 540,401 540,401 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ............................................................. 4,464 4,464 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

004 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY .................................... 110,510 110,510 

005 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY ............................................................ 49,354 49,354 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 19,965 19,965 

007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) ................................................ 237,216 237,216 

008 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) .......... 19,022 19,022 

MODIFICATIONS 

011 PATRIOT MODS ................................................................................ 256,438 256,438 

012 STINGER MODS ................................................................................ 37,252 37,252 

013 ITAS/TOW MODS ............................................................................. 20,000 20,000 

014 MLRS MODS ...................................................................................... 11,571 11,571 

015 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS ............................................................. 6,105 6,105 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

016 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 11,222 11,222 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

017 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS ................................................................ 3,530 3,530 

018 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) ........................................ 1,748 1,748 

019 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ..................................................... 5,285 5,285 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................... 1,334,083 1,334,083 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 STRYKER VEHICLE ......................................................................... 374,100 374,100 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
427 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

002 STRYKER (MOD) ............................................................................... 20,522 20,522 

003 FIST VEHICLE (MOD) ...................................................................... 29,965 29,965 

004 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .......................................................... 158,000 158,000 

005 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) ........................ 4,769 4,769 

006 PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) .......................... 260,177 219,477 

Transfer to PE 0604854A at Army Request ............................... [–40,700 ] 

007 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) .......... 111,031 186,031 

Program increase ......................................................................... [75,000 ] 

008 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) ............................................................... 2,500 2,500 

009 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE ................................................... 62,951 62,951 

010 M88 FOV MODS ................................................................................. 28,469 28,469 

011 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE ............................................................... 2,002 2,002 

012 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) .............................................................. 178,100 178,100 

013 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM ..................................................... 90,000 

Program increase ......................................................................... [90,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

014 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) .............................. 1,544 1,544 

WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

015 INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY ........... 69,147 0 

Transfer to PE 0604601A per Army’s request ............................ [–11,000 ] 

XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement ............................. [–58,147 ] 

018 MORTAR SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 5,310 5,310 

019 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) ........................ 24,049 24,049 

021 CARBINE ............................................................................................ 70,846 21,254 

Individual Carbine program cancelation ................................... [–49,592 ] 

023 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION ........ 56,580 56,580 

024 HANDGUN .......................................................................................... 300 300 

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

026 M777 MODS ........................................................................................ 39,300 39,300 

027 M4 CARBINE MODS ......................................................................... 10,300 10,300 

028 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................ 33,691 33,691 

029 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................ 7,608 7,608 

030 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS ........................................ 2,719 2,719 

031 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS ............................................... 7,017 7,017 

032 M119 MODIFICATIONS ................................................................... 18,707 18,707 

033 M16 RIFLE MODS ............................................................................. 2,136 2,136 

034 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ................ 1,569 1,569 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

035 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ................................... 2,024 2,024 

036 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) .......................... 10,108 10,108 

037 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ..................................................... 459 459 

038 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) ................. 1,267 1,267 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY ................ 1,597,267 1,602,828 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 112,167 87,167 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ...................... [–25,000 ] 

003 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 58,571 53,571 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ...................... [–5,000 ] 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES ........................................................ 9,858 9,858 

005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 80,037 55,037 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ...................... [–25,000 ] 

007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 16,496 6,196 

Program decrease ......................................................................... [–10,300 ] 

008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 69,533 50,033 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ...................... [–19,500 ] 

009 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 55,781 55,781 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 38,029 38,029 

011 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 24,656 24,656 

012 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ........................................................ 60,781 60,781 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
428 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

TANK AMMUNITION 

013 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES .......... 121,551 121,551 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES ....... 39,825 39,825 

015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ........................ 37,902 37,902 

016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 ...................................... 67,896 67,896 

017 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL ...... 71,205 71,205 

ROCKETS 

020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................. 1,012 1,012 

021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES .................................................. 108,476 108,476 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ..................................... 24,074 24,074 

023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 33,242 33,242 

024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 7,609 7,609 

025 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ............................................................. 5,228 5,228 

MISCELLANEOUS 

026 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES .............................................. 16,700 16,700 

027 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES .................................. 7,366 7,366 

028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 3,614 3,614 

029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) ................................... 12,423 12,423 

030 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT ...................................... 16,604 16,604 

031 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) .................. 14,328 14,328 

032 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES ................................................................ 108 108 

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

033 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ................................. 242,324 242,324 

034 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION ............... 179,605 179,605 

035 ARMS INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 3,436 3,436 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .... 1,540,437 1,455,637 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS ............................................ 4,000 4,000 

002 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: ........................................................... 6,841 6,841 

003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) ........................... 223,910 223,910 

004 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP ............ 11,880 11,880 

005 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) ................... 14,731 14,731 

006 PLS ESP .............................................................................................. 44,252 44,252 

009 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV ........ 39,525 39,525 

011 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS ............... 51,258 25,958 

Funding ahead of need ................................................................ [–25,300 ] 

012 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP .............................................. 49,904 49,904 

013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ...... 2,200 2,200 

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 

014 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN ............................................................. 400 400 

015 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 716 716 

016 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER ............................................. 5,619 5,619 

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

018 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK .................... 973,477 973,477 

019 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ........................................ 14,120 14,120 

020 JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY ..... 7,869 7,869 

021 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) ................................................. 5,296 5,296 

COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

022 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS ...... 147,212 147,212 

023 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS.7,998 7,998 

024 SHF TERM ......................................................................................... 7,232 7,232 

025 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) ............... 3,308 3,308 

026 SMART-T (SPACE) ............................................................................ 13,992 13,992 

028 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS ......................................................... 28,206 28,206 

029 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) ............................................... 2,778 2,778 

COMM—C3 SYSTEM 

031 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) ....................... 17,590 17,590 

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
429 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

032 ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) ............. 786 786 

033 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ............................................... 382,930 382,930 

034 MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) ........... 19,200 19,200 

035 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) .......................................... 1,438 1,438 

036 SINCGARS FAMILY .......................................................................... 9,856 9,856 

037 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2 ....................................................... 14,184 14,184 

038 TRACTOR DESK ................................................................................ 6,271 6,271 

040 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS.1,030 1,030 

041 TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM 31,868 31,868 

042 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE .......................................................... 18,000 18,000 

044 RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY ...................................... 1,166 1,166 

045 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE ..... 22,867 22,867 

COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 

048 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE .............................................. 1,512 1,512 

049 ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT .............................................. 61,096 61,096 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

050 TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) ........................................... 13,890 13,890 

051 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP .............. 23,245 23,245 

052 BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE ........................................................... 3,800 3,800 

053 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) ................................ 24,711 24,711 

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

055 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS .......................................... 43,395 43,395 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

057 INFORMATION SYSTEMS .............................................................. 104,577 104,577 

058 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) .......................................... 612 612 

059 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 39,000 39,000 

060 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM .. 248,477 248,477 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

064 JTT/CIBS-M ....................................................................................... 824 824 

065 PROPHET GROUND ......................................................................... 59,198 59,198 

067 DCGS-A (MIP) .................................................................................... 267,214 267,214 

068 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) ......................... 9,899 9,899 

069 TROJAN (MIP) ................................................................................... 24,598 24,598 

070 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) ................................ 1,927 1,927 

071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) ................ 6,169 6,169 

072 MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M 2,924 2,924 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................. 40,735 40,735 

075 EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) ................ 13 13 

076 ENEMY UAS ...................................................................................... 2,800 2,800 

079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES.1,237 1,237 

080 CI MODERNIZATION ....................................................................... 1,399 1,399 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

082 SENTINEL MODS ............................................................................. 47,983 47,983 

083 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) ........................................ 142 142 

084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES ................................................................ 202,428 202,428 

085 LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM 5,183 5,183 

086 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT ...................................... 14,074 14,074 

087 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF ............ 22,300 22,300 

089 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM (GLIS) ....................... 1,016 1,016 

090 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS ............ 55,354 55,354 

091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP .................................................... 800 800 

092 PROFILER .......................................................................................... 3,027 3,027 

093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) ...................... 1,185 1,185 

094 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) .................... 103,214 103,214 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) ..................................................... 26,037 26,037 

097 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM .............................................. 23,100 23,100 

098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ................................................................. 312,727 312,727 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

101 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY ........................................................... 43,228 43,228 

102 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM ....... 14,446 14,446 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
430 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

103 FAAD C2 ............................................................................................. 4,607 4,607 

104 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ............... 33,090 33,090 

105 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM ............................................ 21,200 21,200 

107 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) ................................ 1,795 1,795 

109 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE 54,327 54,327 

110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ....................................... 59,171 59,171 

111 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) .......... 83,936 83,936 

113 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION ............................................................. 25,476 25,476 

114 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET .... 19,341 19,341 

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 

115 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION ............................................ 11,865 11,865 

116 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP .................................. 219,431 219,431 

117 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM ... 6,414 6,414 

118 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) .......................... 62,683 62,683 

120 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) ................ 34,951 34,951 

ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 

121 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) .................................................... 7,440 7,440 

122 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) .............. 1,615 1,615 

ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 

123 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) ........................................... 554 554 

124 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ............................................... 20,000 20,000 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

124A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 3,558 3,558 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ....................... 762 762 

127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ................................................. 20,630 20,630 

128 CBRN DEFENSE ............................................................................... 22,151 22,151 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

130 TACTICAL BRIDGING ...................................................................... 14,188 14,188 

131 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ........................................... 23,101 23,101 

132 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP .................... 15,416 15,416 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

134 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) ......... 50,465 50,465 

135 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) ......................... 6,490 6,490 

136 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION ...................... 1,563 1,563 

137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ... 20,921 20,921 

138 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS ............................................... 100 100 

139 < $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT .......................................... 2,271 2,271 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 HEATERS AND ECU’S ..................................................................... 7,269 7,269 

141 LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES ................................... 200 200 

142 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ............................................................. 1,468 1,468 

143 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) .............. 26,526 26,526 

144 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM ......................................................... 81,680 71,680 

Unjustified unit cost growth ....................................................... [–10,000 ] 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 28,096 28,096 

148 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM 56,150 56,150 

149 MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS ................................................... 3,242 3,242 

150 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS ...... 38,141 38,141 

151 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) ............................................. 5,859 5,859 

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER ................ 60,612 60,612 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

153 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ....................................................... 22,042 22,042 

154 MEDEVAC MISSON EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP) .................. 35,318 35,318 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

155 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS .................... 19,427 19,427 

156 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) ....................................... 3,860 3,860 

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 

157 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) ...................................... 2,000 2,000 

159 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING .......................................................... 36,078 36,078 

160 MISSION MODULES—ENGINEERING ......................................... 9,721 9,721 

162 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR .............................................................. 50,122 50,122 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
431 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

163 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED ........................................................... 28,828 28,828 

164 ALL TERRAIN CRANES ................................................................... 19,863 19,863 

166 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) .................. 23,465 23,465 

168 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP ......... 13,590 13,590 

169 CONST EQUIP ESP .......................................................................... 16,088 16,088 

170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) ................................ 6,850 6,850 

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 

171 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP .............................................................. 38,007 19,007 

Funding ahead of need ................................................................ [–19,000 ] 

172 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) ................................... 10,605 10,605 

GENERATORS 

173 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP .................................. 129,437 129,437 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

174 ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER (RTCH) .................. 1,250 1,250 

175 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS .................................................................. 8,260 8,260 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT .................................. 121,710 121,710 

177 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM ............................................. 225,200 225,200 

178 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER ........................................ 30,063 30,063 

179 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER ................. 34,913 34,913 

180 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING .. 9,955 9,955 

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 

181 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT ............................................... 8,241 8,241 

182 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) ............. 67,506 67,506 

183 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) ....................... 18,755 18,755 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

184 M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR ...................................................... 5,110 5,110 

185 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............ 5,110 5,110 

186 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) ..................................... 62,904 62,904 

187 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT .......................................... 1,427 1,427 

188 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) .................... 96,661 96,661 

189 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) ......................................... 2,450 2,450 

190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING ............................. 11,593 11,593 

191 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 ......................................................... 8,948 8,948 

192 TRACTOR YARD ................................................................................ 8,000 8,000 

OPA2 

195 INITIAL SPARES—C&E ................................................................... 59,700 59,700 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ....................... 6,465,218 6,410,918 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

001 EA–18G ................................................................................................ 2,001,787 1,940,874 

Excess engineering change order funding .................................. [–8,790 ] 

GFE electronics cost growth ........................................................ [–5,943 ] 

Other GFE cost growth ................................................................ [–1,180 ] 

Program adjustment .................................................................... [–45,000 ] 

003 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET ................................................... 206,551 206,551 

004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 75,000 

Program increase ......................................................................... [75,000 ] 

005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV ......................................................... 1,135,444 1,135,444 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 94,766 94,766 

007 JSF STOVL ......................................................................................... 1,267,260 1,267,260 

008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 103,195 103,195 

009 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) ....................................................................... 1,432,573 1,432,573 

010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 55,196 55,196 

011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) ................................................... 749,962 749,962 

012 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 71,000 71,000 

013 MH–60S (MYP) ................................................................................... 383,831 383,831 

014 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 37,278 37,278 

015 MH–60R (MYP) ................................................................................... 599,237 599,237 

016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 231,834 231,834 

017 P–8A POSEIDON ............................................................................... 3,189,989 3,189,989 

018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 313,160 313,160 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
432 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

019 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ....................................................................... 997,107 997,107 

020 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 266,542 266,542 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

021 JPATS .................................................................................................. 249,080 249,080 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

022 KC–130J .............................................................................................. 134,358 134,358 

023 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 32,288 32,288 

025 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 52,002 4,802 

Advance procurement appropriated in fiscal year 2013 ........... [–47,200 ] 

026 MQ–8 UAV .......................................................................................... 60,980 60,980 

028 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT ........................................................ 14,958 14,958 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

029 EA–6 SERIES ..................................................................................... 18,577 18,577 

030 AEA SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 48,502 48,502 

031 AV–8 SERIES ..................................................................................... 41,575 41,575 

032 ADVERSARY ...................................................................................... 2,992 2,992 

033 F–18 SERIES ...................................................................................... 875,371 833,530 

ECP 6038 radome kits cost growth (OSIP 002–07) ................... [–2,952 ] 

Integrated logistics support growth (OSIP 14–03) .................... [–8,000 ] 

Other support and ILS ahead of need (OSIP 04–14) ................ [–20,989 ] 

Retrofit radars (APG–79B) cost growth (OSIP 002–07) ............ [–9,900 ] 

034 H–46 SERIES ..................................................................................... 2,127 2,127 

036 H–53 SERIES ..................................................................................... 67,675 67,675 

037 SH–60 SERIES ................................................................................... 135,054 135,054 

038 H–1 SERIES ....................................................................................... 41,706 41,706 

039 EP–3 SERIES ..................................................................................... 55,903 77,903 

12th aircraft to Spiral 3 .............................................................. [8,000 ] 

Sensor obsolescence ...................................................................... [14,000 ] 

040 P–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 37,436 37,436 

041 E–2 SERIES ........................................................................................ 31,044 31,044 

042 TRAINER A/C SERIES .................................................................... 43,720 40,520 

Avionics Obsolescence installation cost growth ......................... [–3,200 ] 

043 C–2A ..................................................................................................... 902 902 

044 C–130 SERIES .................................................................................... 47,587 47,587 

045 FEWSG ................................................................................................ 665 665 

046 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES ............................................... 14,587 14,587 

047 E–6 SERIES ........................................................................................ 189,312 183,218 

FAB-T funding previously appropriated (OSIP 014–14) .......... [–6,094 ] 

048 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES ........................................... 85,537 85,537 

049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ...................................................... 3,684 13,684 

Program office sustainment ........................................................ [5,000 ] 

Sensor obsolescence ...................................................................... [5,000 ] 

050 T–45 SERIES ...................................................................................... 98,128 98,128 

051 POWER PLANT CHANGES .............................................................. 22,999 22,999 

052 JPATS SERIES .................................................................................. 1,576 1,576 

053 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS ................................................. 6,267 6,267 

054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 141,685 141,685 

055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .................................................... 120,660 120,660 

056 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM ................................. 3,554 3,554 

057 ID SYSTEMS ...................................................................................... 41,800 41,800 

058 P–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 9,485 9,485 

059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ............................................................ 14,431 14,431 

060 MQ–8 SERIES .................................................................................... 1,001 1,001 

061 RQ–7 SERIES ..................................................................................... 26,433 26,433 

062 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY ............................................. 160,834 160,834 

063 F–35 STOVL SERIES ........................................................................ 147,130 147,130 

064 F–35 CV SERIES ................................................................................ 31,100 31,100 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 1,142,461 1,142,461 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 

066 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ................................................. 410,044 410,044 

067 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .......................................... 27,450 27,450 

068 WAR CONSUMABLES ...................................................................... 28,930 28,930 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
433 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

069 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ................................................. 5,268 5,268 

070 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................. 60,306 60,306 

071 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................. 1,775 1,775 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY .................. 17,927,651 17,875,403 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

001 TRIDENT II MODS ........................................................................... 1,140,865 1,140,865 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ............................................. 7,617 7,617 

STRATEGIC MISSILES 

003 TOMAHAWK ....................................................................................... 312,456 312,456 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

004 AMRAAM ............................................................................................ 95,413 95,413 

005 SIDEWINDER .................................................................................... 117,208 117,208 

006 JSOW ................................................................................................... 136,794 136,794 

007 STANDARD MISSILE ....................................................................... 367,985 367,985 

008 RAM ..................................................................................................... 67,596 65,984 

Guidance and control assembly contract savings ...................... [–1,612 ] 

009 HELLFIRE .......................................................................................... 33,916 33,916 

011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) ....... 6,278 6,278 

012 AERIAL TARGETS ............................................................................ 41,799 41,799 

013 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT ........................................................... 3,538 3,538 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

014 ESSM ................................................................................................... 76,749 76,749 

015 HARM MODS ..................................................................................... 111,902 111,902 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES .......................................... 1,138 1,138 

017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON ..................................... 23,014 23,014 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

018 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................ 84,318 84,318 

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

019 SSTD ................................................................................................... 3,978 3,978 

020 ASW TARGETS .................................................................................. 8,031 8,031 

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

021 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS ................................................................. 125,898 125,898 

022 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS ................................................... 53,203 53,203 

023 QUICKSTRIKE MINE ....................................................................... 7,800 7,800 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

024 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 59,730 59,730 

025 ASW RANGE SUPPORT ................................................................... 4,222 4,222 

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

026 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................. 3,963 3,963 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ....................................................... 12,513 12,513 

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

028 CIWS MODS ....................................................................................... 56,308 62,708 

Additional RMA kits ................................................................... [6,400 ] 

029 COAST GUARD WEAPONS .............................................................. 10,727 7,269 

Machine gun equipment cost growth .......................................... [–3,458 ] 

030 GUN MOUNT MODS ......................................................................... 72,901 59,521 

MK38 gun kits cost growth ......................................................... [–13,380 ] 

031 CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS ...................................... 1,943 1,943 

032 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS ....................... 19,758 19,758 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

034 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 52,632 52,632 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY .................. 3,122,193 3,110,143 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 

NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 37,703 37,703 

002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................... 65,411 65,411 

003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ...................................................... 20,284 20,284 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
434 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

004 PRACTICE BOMBS ........................................................................... 37,870 37,870 

005 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES ............................ 53,764 53,764 

006 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES .................................. 67,194 67,194 

007 JATOS ................................................................................................. 2,749 2,749 

008 LRLAP 6′′ LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE ........................ 3,906 3,906 

009 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION ..................................................... 24,151 24,151 

010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION ........................ 33,080 33,080 

011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ................................................ 40,398 40,398 

012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO .................................. 61,219 61,219 

013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .............................................. 10,637 10,637 

014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION ..................................... 4,578 4,578 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ......................................................... 26,297 26,297 

016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .................................................... 6,088 6,088 

017 40 MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 7,644 7,644 

018 60MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 3,349 3,349 

020 120MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 13,361 13,361 

022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 2,149 2,149 

023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .................................................................... 27,465 27,465 

026 FUZE, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 26,366 26,366 

028 AMMO MODERNIZATION ............................................................... 8,403 8,403 

029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 5,201 5,201 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ....... 589,267 589,267 

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY 

OTHER WARSHIPS 

001 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ......................................... 944,866 944,866 

003 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ..................................................... 2,930,704 3,422,704 

Increase to Virginia class ............................................................ [492,000 ] 

004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 2,354,612 2,354,612 

005 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS .................................................... 1,705,424 1,683,353 

CVN 72 requirement previously funded in Fiscal Year 2012 

reprogramming.

[–22,071 ] 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 245,793 245,793 

007 DDG 1000 ............................................................................................ 231,694 231,694 

008 DDG–51 ............................................................................................... 1,615,564 1,615,564 

009 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 388,551 388,551 

010 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP .............................................................. 1,793,014 1,793,014 

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 

012 AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE ............................................ 524,000 579,300 

Navy requested adjustment ......................................................... [55,300 ] 

014 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL ........................................................ 2,732 2,732 

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 

016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 183,900 207,300 

Program shortfall ........................................................................ [23,400 ] 

017 OUTFITTING ..................................................................................... 450,163 450,163 

019 LCAC SLEP ........................................................................................ 80,987 80,987 

020 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS .................. 625,800 733,400 

DDG–51 ........................................................................................ [100,000 ] 

Joint High Speed Vessel .............................................................. [7,600 ] 

TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY ........ 14,077,804 14,734,033 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 

001 LM–2500 GAS TURBINE .................................................................. 10,180 10,180 

002 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE ....................................................... 5,536 5,536 

003 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) ................................................. 16,956 3,956 

Contract delay .............................................................................. [–13,000 ] 

GENERATORS 

004 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E ..................................................... 19,782 19,782 

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 

005 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT .............................................. 39,509 39,509 

PERISCOPES 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
435 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

006 SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP ........................................ 52,515 52,515 

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 

007 DDG MOD ........................................................................................... 285,994 285,994 

008 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 14,389 14,389 

009 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD .............................. 2,436 2,436 

010 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE ......................................................................... 12,700 12,700 

011 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM ................... 40,329 40,329 

012 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT .......................................... 19,603 19,603 

013 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 8,678 8,678 

014 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................. 74,209 74,209 

015 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................. 47,078 47,078 

016 SUBMARINE BATTERIES ............................................................... 37,000 37,000 

017 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................ 25,053 25,053 

018 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ................................. 12,986 12,986 

019 DSSP EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 2,455 2,455 

020 CG MODERNIZATION ...................................................................... 10,539 10,539 

021 LCAC ................................................................................................... 14,431 14,431 

022 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS .................................................. 36,700 36,700 

023 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 119,902 119,902 

024 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS ............................................ 3,678 3,678 

025 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................ 8,292 8,292 

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 

027 REACTOR COMPONENTS ............................................................... 286,744 286,744 

OCEAN ENGINEERING 

028 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT .......................................... 8,780 8,780 

SMALL BOATS 

029 STANDARD BOATS .......................................................................... 36,452 33,056 

CNIC force protection medium contract delay ........................... [–3,396 ] 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

030 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT ...................................... 36,145 36,145 

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 

031 OPERATING FORCES IPE ............................................................... 69,368 49,868 

Emergent repair facility outfitting ahead of need ..................... [–19,500 ] 

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 

032 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS .............................................................. 106,328 106,328 

033 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT .................... 45,966 45,966 

034 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES ..................................................... 59,885 59,885 

035 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES ...................................................... 37,168 37,168 

LOGISTIC SUPPORT 

036 LSD MIDLIFE .................................................................................... 77,974 77,974 

SHIP SONARS 

038 SPQ–9B RADAR ................................................................................. 27,934 27,934 

039 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM ................................ 83,231 83,231 

040 SSN ACOUSTICS .............................................................................. 199,438 199,438 

041 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................ 9,394 9,394 

042 SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS ................................... 12,953 12,953 

043 ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC ................................................ 8,958 8,958 

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

044 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM ............................ 24,077 24,077 

045 SSTD ................................................................................................... 11,925 8,500 

AN/SLQ–25X cancellation .......................................................... [–3,425 ] 

046 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .................................................. 94,338 94,338 

047 SURTASS ............................................................................................ 9,680 9,680 

048 MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE ............ 18,130 18,130 

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 

049 AN/SLQ–32 ........................................................................................ 203,375 199,691 

Excess block 2 support funding .................................................. [–3,684 ] 

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 

050 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT ............................................................... 123,656 123,656 

051 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) ........................ 896 896 

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 

052 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG .............................. 49,475 49,475 

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
436 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

053 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY ............................. 34,692 34,692 

054 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) ................................... 396 396 

055 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) .. 15,703 15,703 

056 ATDLS ................................................................................................. 3,836 3,836 

057 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) ................. 7,201 7,201 

058 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ............................... 54,400 54,400 

059 SHALLOW WATER MCM ................................................................. 8,548 8,548 

060 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) ........................................... 11,765 11,765 

061 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE ......................... 6,483 6,483 

062 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ................................. 7,631 7,631 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

063 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................................... 53,644 53,644 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

064 MATCALS ........................................................................................... 7,461 7,461 

065 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ......................................... 9,140 9,140 

066 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ................................ 20,798 20,798 

067 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM ................................................... 19,754 19,754 

068 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS ................................ 8,909 8,909 

069 LANDING SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 13,554 13,554 

070 ID SYSTEMS ...................................................................................... 38,934 38,934 

071 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ...................................... 14,131 14,131 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

072 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL ......................... 3,249 3,249 

073 MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM ..................... 11,646 11,646 

074 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS .............................................. 18,189 18,189 

075 DCGS-N ............................................................................................... 17,350 17,350 

076 CANES ................................................................................................ 340,567 340,567 

077 RADIAC ............................................................................................... 9,835 9,835 

078 CANES-INTELL ................................................................................. 59,652 59,652 

079 GPETE ................................................................................................. 6,253 6,253 

080 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY ................................. 4,963 4,963 

081 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION ........................................... 4,664 4,664 

082 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 66,889 66,889 

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 

084 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION ................................... 23,877 23,877 

086 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M .................................... 28,001 28,001 

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 

087 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT .......................................... 7,856 7,856 

088 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT .......................... 74,376 74,376 

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

089 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ............................... 27,381 27,381 

090 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) ........................................ 215,952 215,952 

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 

091 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ........................................ 4,463 4,463 

092 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS ................................................... 778 778 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 

094 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ........................... 133,530 133,530 

095 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM ............................................... 1,000 1,000 

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 

096 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP ............................... 12,251 12,251 

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 

097 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 2,893 2,893 

SONOBUOYS 

099 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES ............................................................. 179,927 179,927 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 55,279 55,279 

101 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ........................................................ 8,792 8,792 

102 AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT ........................................... 11,364 11,364 

103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT ..................... 59,502 59,502 

104 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT ................................................ 19,118 19,118 

105 DCRS/DPL ......................................................................................... 1,425 1,425 

106 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT ............................................................. 29,670 29,670 

107 AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES .................................... 101,554 101,554 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
437 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

108 LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT ................................... 18,293 18,293 

109 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS ...................... 7,969 7,969 

110 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 5,215 5,215 

111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS) ..... 4,827 4,827 

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 

112 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM ............................................... 1,188 1,188 

113 GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT .............................................. 4,447 4,447 

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 

114 NATO SEASPARROW ....................................................................... 58,368 58,368 

115 RAM GMLS ......................................................................................... 491 491 

116 SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM ..................................................... 51,858 51,858 

117 AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 59,757 59,757 

118 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................... 71,559 71,559 

119 VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS ..................................................... 626 626 

120 MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS .............. 2,779 2,779 

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

121 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP ..................................... 224,484 224,484 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

122 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................. 85,678 85,678 

123 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................ 3,913 3,913 

124 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................... 3,909 3,909 

125 ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 28,694 28,694 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

126 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP ............................... 46,586 46,586 

127 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 11,933 11,933 

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 

128 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM ......................................... 62,361 62,361 

129 SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ........................................... 41,813 41,813 

130 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ..................................... 26,672 26,672 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

131 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 5,600 5,600 

132 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS ....................................................... 3,717 3,717 

133 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP ............................... 10,881 10,881 

134 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 14,748 14,748 

135 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 5,540 5,540 

136 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 5,741 5,741 

137 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT .......................................... 3,852 3,852 

138 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION ........................................................... 25,757 25,757 

139 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES ................................................. 1,182 1,182 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ........................................ 14,250 14,250 

141 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................... 6,401 6,401 

142 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................. 5,718 5,718 

143 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS ...................................... 22,597 22,597 

TRAINING DEVICES 

144 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............................................. 22,527 22,527 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

145 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................. 50,428 50,428 

146 EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 2,292 2,292 

147 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................ 4,925 4,925 

149 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................ 3,202 3,202 

151 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................... 24,294 24,294 

152 C4ISR EQUIPMENT .......................................................................... 4,287 4,287 

153 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................... 18,276 18,276 

154 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................................. 134,495 134,495 

155 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................ 324,327 324,327 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

156A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 12,140 12,140 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

157 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 317,234 317,234 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ........................ 6,310,257 6,267,252 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
438 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 AAV7A1 PIP ........................................................................................ 32,360 32,360 

002 LAV PIP ............................................................................................... 6,003 6,003 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ............................... 589 589 

004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ............................... 3,655 3,655 

005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM ...................... 5,467 5,467 

006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION .... 20,354 20,354 

OTHER SUPPORT 

007 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 38,446 38,446 

008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM ...................................... 4,734 4,734 

GUIDED MISSILES 

009 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE ................................................... 15,713 15,713 

010 JAVELIN ............................................................................................. 36,175 36,175 

012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) ............... 1,136 1,136 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 33,976 30,078 

TOW Unit Cost Growth ............................................................... [–3,898 ] 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 

014 UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER ........................................................ 16,273 16,273 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .................................................. 41,063 41,063 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ......................................................... 2,930 2,930 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................... 1,637 1,637 

019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS ................................................... 18,394 18,394 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

020 RADAR SYSTEMS ............................................................................. 114,051 101,941 

Previously funded EDM refurbishment ...................................... [–12,110 ] 

021 RQ–21 UAS ......................................................................................... 66,612 66,612 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

022 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 3,749 3,749 

023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................... 75,979 75,979 

026 RQ–11 UAV ......................................................................................... 1,653 1,653 

027 DCGS-MC ............................................................................................ 9,494 9,494 

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 6,171 6,171 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ............................................ 121,955 119,955 

Unit cost growth .......................................................................... [–2,000 ] 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS .......................................................... 83,294 83,294 

031 RADIO SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 74,718 74,718 

032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS .............................. 47,613 47,613 

033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ......................... 19,573 19,573 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 5,659 5,659 

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 

034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES ...................................... 1,039 1,039 

035 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES ................................................ 31,050 31,050 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

036 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) .......................................................... 36,333 36,333 

037 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS ...................................... 3,137 3,137 

040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ................................................ 27,385 27,385 

OTHER SUPPORT 

041 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 7,016 7,016 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................... 14,377 14,377 

043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 24,864 24,864 

044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ............................................................ 21,592 21,592 

045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ................................................. 61,353 61,353 

046 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................ 4,827 4,827 

047 EOD SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 40,011 40,011 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
439 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

048 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................................. 16,809 16,809 

049 GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE) ........... 3,408 3,408 

050 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ...................................................... 48,549 48,549 

051 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................. 190 190 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

052 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 23,129 23,129 

053 TRAINING DEVICES ........................................................................ 8,346 8,346 

054 CONTAINER FAMILY ....................................................................... 1,857 1,857 

055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................... 36,198 36,198 

056 RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN .................................................... 2,390 2,390 

OTHER SUPPORT 

057 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 6,525 6,525 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

058 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 13,700 13,700 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................... 1,343,511 1,325,503 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

TACTICAL FORCES 

001 F–35 ..................................................................................................... 3,060,770 2,989,270 

Decrease non-recurring engineering initiatives ......................... [–71,500 ] 

002 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 363,783 363,783 

OTHER AIRLIFT 

005 C–130J ................................................................................................. 537,517 537,517 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 162,000 162,000 

007 HC–130J .............................................................................................. 132,121 132,121 

008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 88,000 88,000 

009 MC–130J .............................................................................................. 389,434 389,434 

010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 104,000 104,000 

HELICOPTERS 

015 CV–22 (MYP) ....................................................................................... 230,798 230,798 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

017 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C .................................................................. 2,541 2,541 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

020 TARGET DRONES ............................................................................. 138,669 138,669 

022 AC–130J .............................................................................................. 470,019 470,019 

024 RQ–4 .................................................................................................... 27,000 11,000 

Production closeout ...................................................................... [–16,000 ] 

027 MQ–9 .................................................................................................... 272,217 352,217 

Program increase ......................................................................... [80,000 ] 

028 RQ–4 BLOCK 40 PROC ..................................................................... 1,747 1,747 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

029 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 20,019 20,019 

030 B–1B ..................................................................................................... 132,222 132,222 

031 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 111,002 105,882 

Internal Weapons Bay Upgrade defer low rate initial production.[–5,120 ] 

032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES ............. 27,197 27,197 

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 

033 A–10 ..................................................................................................... 47,598 47,598 

034 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 354,624 354,624 

035 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 11,794 11,794 

036 F–22A ................................................................................................... 285,830 285,830 

037 F–35 MODIFICATIONS ..................................................................... 157,777 157,777 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

038 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 2,456 2,456 

039 C–5M .................................................................................................... 1,021,967 983,967 

Program excess ............................................................................. [–38,000 ] 

042 C–17A ................................................................................................... 143,197 143,197 

043 C–21 ..................................................................................................... 103 103 

044 C–32A ................................................................................................... 9,780 9,780 

045 C–37A ................................................................................................... 452 452 

LRIP Kit Procurement ................................................................. [47,300 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
440 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Transfer to Title II, RDAF, line 230 .......................................... [–47,300 ] 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

047 GLIDER MODS .................................................................................. 128 128 

048 T–6 ....................................................................................................... 6,427 6,427 

049 T–1 ....................................................................................................... 277 277 

050 T–38 ..................................................................................................... 28,686 28,686 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

052 U–2 MODS .......................................................................................... 45,591 45,591 

053 KC–10A (ATCA) .................................................................................. 70,918 70,918 

054 C–12 ..................................................................................................... 1,876 1,876 

055 MC–12W .............................................................................................. 5,000 5,000 

056 C–20 MODS ........................................................................................ 192 192 

057 VC–25A MOD ...................................................................................... 263 263 

058 C–40 ..................................................................................................... 6,119 6,119 

059 C–130 ................................................................................................... 58,577 74,277 

C–130H Propulsion System Engine Upgrades .......................... [15,700 ] 

061 C–130J MODS .................................................................................... 10,475 10,475 

062 C–135 ................................................................................................... 46,556 46,556 

063 COMPASS CALL MODS ................................................................... 34,494 34,494 

064 RC–135 ................................................................................................ 171,813 171,813 

065 E–3 ....................................................................................................... 197,087 197,087 

066 E–4 ....................................................................................................... 14,304 14,304 

067 E–8 ....................................................................................................... 57,472 57,472 

068 H–1 ....................................................................................................... 6,627 6,627 

069 H–60 ..................................................................................................... 27,654 27,654 

070 RQ–4 MODS ........................................................................................ 9,313 9,313 

071 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ....................................................... 16,300 16,300 

072 OTHER AIRCRAFT ........................................................................... 6,948 6,948 

073 MQ–1 MODS ....................................................................................... 9,734 9,734 

074 MQ–9 MODS ....................................................................................... 102,970 62,970 

Anti-ice production ahead of need .............................................. [–5,520 ] 

Lynx radar reduction ................................................................... [–34,480 ] 

076 RQ–4 GSRA/CSRA MODS ................................................................ 30,000 30,000 

077 CV–22 MODS ...................................................................................... 23,310 23,310 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

078 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ................................................ 463,285 463,285 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ........................... 49,140 49,140 

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 

081 B–1 ....................................................................................................... 3,683 3,683 

083 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 43,786 43,786 

084 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 7,000 7,000 

087 C–17A ................................................................................................... 81,952 81,952 

089 C–135 ................................................................................................... 8,597 8,597 

090 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 2,403 2,403 

091 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 3,455 3,455 

092 F–22A ................................................................................................... 5,911 5,911 

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 

094 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS ................................................. 21,148 21,148 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

095 WAR CONSUMABLES ...................................................................... 94,947 94,947 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

096 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ................................................. 1,242,004 1,242,004 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

101A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 75,845 75,845 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....... 11,398,901 11,323,981 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 

001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC ................................... 39,104 39,104 

TACTICAL 

002 JASSM ................................................................................................. 291,151 291,151 

003 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) ................................................................... 119,904 119,904 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
441 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

004 AMRAAM ............................................................................................ 340,015 340,015 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE ................................................... 48,548 48,548 

006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB .............................................................. 42,347 42,347 

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

007 INDUSTR’L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION ......................... 752 752 

CLASS IV 

009 MM III MODIFICATIONS ................................................................ 21,635 21,635 

010 AGM–65D MAVERICK ....................................................................... 276 276 

011 AGM–88A HARM ................................................................................ 580 580 

012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ...................................... 6,888 6,888 

013 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB .............................................................. 5,000 5,000 

MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

014 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ................................................ 72,080 72,080 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

015 ADVANCED EHF ............................................................................... 379,586 379,586 

016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE) .......................... 38,398 38,398 

017 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT .............................................................. 403,431 403,431 

018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ............................................... 74,167 74,167 

019 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) .................................................. 5,244 5,244 

020 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) ................................................... 55,997 55,997 

021 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE) ............................. 95,673 95,673 

022 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) ...................... 1,852,900 1,852,900 

023 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) ......................................................................... 583,192 583,192 

SPECIAL PROGRAMS 

029 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS ..................................................... 36,716 36,716 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

029A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 829,702 829,702 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......... 5,343,286 5,343,286 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ........................................................................................... 15,735 15,735 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ..................................................................................... 129,921 129,921 

BOMBS 

003 PRACTICE BOMBS ........................................................................... 30,840 30,840 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 187,397 187,397 

005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ............................................ 188,510 188,510 

OTHER ITEMS 

006 CAD/PAD ............................................................................................ 35,837 35,837 

007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) ................................. 7,531 7,531 

008 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 499 499 

009 MODIFICATIONS .............................................................................. 480 480 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 9,765 9,765 

FLARES 

011 FLARES ............................................................................................... 55,864 55,864 

FUZES 

013 FUZES ................................................................................................. 76,037 76,037 

SMALL ARMS 

014 SMALL ARMS .................................................................................... 21,026 21,026 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR 

FORCE.

759,442 759,442 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ............................................ 2,048 2,048 

CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 

002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE ...................................................... 8,019 8,019 

003 CAP VEHICLES ................................................................................. 946 946 

004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 7,138 7,138 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES ....................................... 13,093 13,093 

006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 13,983 13,983 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
442 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ........................... 23,794 23,794 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

008 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 8,669 8,669 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 

009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP .......................... 6,144 6,144 

010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 1,580 1,580 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

012 COMSEC EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 149,661 149,661 

013 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) .......................................................... 726 726 

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................... 2,789 2,789 

015 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT .......................................... 31,875 31,875 

016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS ............................................................ 452 452 

017 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .................................................... 14,203 14,203 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS ................................. 46,232 46,232 

019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM .................................................... 11,685 11,685 

020 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED .......................................... 19,248 19,248 

021 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS ...................... 19,292 19,292 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ........................................ 17,166 17,166 

023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL ..................................... 22,723 22,723 

024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX ............................................. 27,930 27,930 

025 TAC SIGNIT SPT ............................................................................... 217 217 

SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

027 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .................................. 49,627 49,627 

028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS .................................. 13,559 13,559 

029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL ....................................... 11,186 11,186 

030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM .............................. 43,238 43,238 

031 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES ........................................................ 10,431 10,431 

032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES ............................................................... 13,769 13,769 

033 GCSS-AF FOS .................................................................................... 19,138 19,138 

034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM .......................................... 8,809 8,809 

035 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS ............................... 26,935 26,935 

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 

036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS ...................................... 80,558 80,558 

038 AFNET ................................................................................................. 97,588 97,588 

039 VOICE SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 8,419 8,419 

040 USCENTCOM ..................................................................................... 34,276 34,276 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE ..................................... 28,235 28,235 

042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE ..................................................................... 2,061 2,061 

043 NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE .................................................. 4,415 4,415 

044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE ............................ 30,237 30,237 

045 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE ........................................... 98,062 98,062 

046 MILSATCOM SPACE ........................................................................ 105,935 105,935 

047 SPACE MODS SPACE ....................................................................... 37,861 37,861 

048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM ............................................................. 7,171 7,171 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 83,537 83,537 

050 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER .................................... 11,884 8,634 

Unjustified unit cost growth for batteries .................................. [–3,250 ] 

051 RADIO EQUIPMENT ........................................................................ 14,711 14,711 

052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT .............................................. 10,275 10,275 

053 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................. 50,907 50,907 

MODIFICATIONS 

054 COMM ELECT MODS ....................................................................... 55,701 55,701 

PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 

055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES .............................................................. 14,524 4,036 

Night Vision Cueing and Display termination .......................... [–10,488 ] 

056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 28,655 28,655 

DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 

057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP .......................... 9,332 9,332 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
443 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

058 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT .................................................... 16,762 16,762 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ....................................................... 33,768 33,768 

060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT .................................... 2,495 2,495 

061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 12,859 12,859 

062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 1,954 1,954 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

064 DARP RC135 ....................................................................................... 24,528 24,528 

065 DCGS-AF ............................................................................................. 137,819 137,819 

067 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM ........................................................ 479,586 479,586 

068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. ........................... 45,159 45,159 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 14,519,256 14,519,256 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

069 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 25,746 25,746 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............. 16,760,581 16,746,843 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 

001 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 1,291 1,291 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 

002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 5,711 5,711 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 

003 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION .................................................. 47,201 47,201 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

009 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY .......................................... 16,189 16,189 

012 TELEPORT PROGRAM ..................................................................... 66,075 66,075 

013 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ................................................... 83,881 83,881 

014 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ...................... 2,572 2,572 

015 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK ......................... 125,557 125,557 

017 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ..................................................... 16,941 16,941 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 

018 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 13,137 13,137 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 

019 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 15,414 15,414 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 

020 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS ....... 1,454 1,454 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 

021 EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................... 978 978 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 

022 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ....................................................................... 5,020 5,020 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION 

AGENCY 

023 VEHICLES .......................................................................................... 100 100 

024 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 13,395 13,395 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 

026 THAAD ................................................................................................ 581,005 581,005 

027 AEGIS BMD ........................................................................................ 580,814 580,814 

028 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS .............................................................. 62,000 62,000 

029 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III ............................................................. 131,400 131,400 

031 IRON DOME ....................................................................................... 220,309 220,309 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

039 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ......... 14,363 14,363 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

040 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD ............................................................. 37,345 37,345 

041 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ........................................ 16,678 16,678 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 

042 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS .............................................................. 14,792 14,792 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 

043 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS ............................................................ 35,259 35,259 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 544,272 544,272 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
444 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AVIATION PROGRAMS 

045 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT ..................... 112,456 112,456 

046 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM .......................................... 81,457 81,457 

047 NON-STANDARD AVIATION ........................................................... 2,650 2,650 

048 U–28 ..................................................................................................... 56,208 56,208 

049 MH–47 CHINOOK .............................................................................. 19,766 19,766 

050 RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ........................................ 850 850 

051 CV–22 MODIFICATION .................................................................... 98,927 98,927 

052 MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ......................................... 20,576 20,576 

053 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ......................................... 1,893 14,893 

Capability Improvements ............................................................ [13,000 ] 

055 STUASL0 ............................................................................................ 13,166 13,166 

056 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE ..................................................... 107,687 107,687 

057 AC/MC–130J ...................................................................................... 51,870 51,870 

059 C–130 MODIFICATIONS .................................................................. 71,940 61,317 

C–130 TF/TA—early to need ...................................................... [–10,623 ] 

SHIPBUILDING 

061 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ............................................................... 37,439 37,439 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

063 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M ............................................................... 159,029 159,029 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 79,819 79,819 

068 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ...... 14,906 14,906 

070 OTHER ITEMS <$5M ........................................................................ 81,711 81,711 

071 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS .................................................... 35,053 33,897 

CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request ............................... [–1,156 ] 

074 SPECIAL PROGRAMS ...................................................................... 41,526 41,526 

075 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 43,353 43,353 

076 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M ............................................................. 210,540 210,540 

078 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS .......................................... 20,000 20,000 

082 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES .......................... 6,645 6,645 

083 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ................. 25,581 25,581 

089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................ 191,061 191,061 

CBDP 

091 INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION ........................................ 14,271 14,271 

092 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ............................................................ 101,667 101,667 

094 JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM (MEDICAL) ............................ 13,447 13,447 

095 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION ........................................................... 20,896 20,896 

096 CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE .................................................... 144,540 144,540 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ................... 4,534,083 4,535,304 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ........................ 98,800 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–98,800 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS 

FUND.

98,800 0 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT ..................................................... 98,227,168 98,442,249 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

FIXED WING 

002 SATURN ARCH (MIP) ....................................................................... 48,000 48,000 

004 MQ–1 UAV .......................................................................................... 31,988 31,988 

ROTARY 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
445 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

009 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD ................................... 142,000 142,000 

011 KIOWA WARRIOR WRA .................................................................... 163,800 163,800 

014 CH–47 HELICOPTER ........................................................................ 386,000 386,000 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................. 771,788 771,788 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ............................................................. 54,000 54,000 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) ................................................ 39,045 39,045 

010 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM .................... 35,600 35,600 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................... 128,645 128,645 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY 

SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 4,400 4,400 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES ........................................................ 1,500 1,500 

005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ............................................................... 5,000 5,000 

008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 60,000 60,000 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 5,000 5,000 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES ....... 10,000 10,000 

015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ........................ 10,000 10,000 

016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 ...................................... 11,000 11,000 

ROCKETS 

021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES .................................................. 57,000 57,000 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ..................................... 4,000 4,000 

023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 3,000 3,000 

024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 8,000 8,000 

MISCELLANEOUS 

028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 2,000 2,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY .... 180,900 180,900 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY 

013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ...... 321,040 321,040 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

060 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM .. 25,000 25,000 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

067 DCGS-A (MIP) .................................................................................... 7,200 7,200 

071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) ................ 5,980 5,980 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................. 57,800 57,800 

078 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE ...... 15,300 15,300 

079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES.4,221 4,221 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP .................................................... 1,834 1,834 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) ..................................................... 21,000 21,000 

098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ................................................................. 85,830 85,830 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

146 FORCE PROVIDER ........................................................................... 51,654 51,654 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 6,264 6,264 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ....................... 603,123 603,123 

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND 

NETWORK ATTACK 

001 ATTACK THE NETWORK ................................................................ 417,700 417,700 

JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT 

002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE ..................................................................... 248,886 248,886 

FORCE TRAINING 

003 TRAIN THE FORCE .......................................................................... 106,000 106,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
446 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

004 OPERATIONS .................................................................................... 227,414 182,414 

Program decrease ......................................................................... [–45,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT 

FUND.

1,000,000 955,000 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) ................................................... 29,520 29,520 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

026 MQ–8 UAV .......................................................................................... 13,100 13,100 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

031 AV–8 SERIES ..................................................................................... 57,652 57,652 

033 F–18 SERIES ...................................................................................... 35,500 35,500 

039 EP–3 SERIES ..................................................................................... 2,700 2,700 

049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ...................................................... 3,375 3,375 

054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 49,183 49,183 

055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .................................................... 4,190 4,190 

059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ............................................................ 20,700 20,700 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ........................................................ 24,776 24,776 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY .................. 240,696 240,696 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

TACTICAL MISSILES 

009 HELLFIRE .......................................................................................... 27,000 27,000 

010 LASER MAVERICK ........................................................................... 58,000 58,000 

011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) ....... 1,500 1,500 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY .................. 86,500 86,500 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC 

NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 11,424 11,424 

002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................... 30,332 30,332 

003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ...................................................... 8,282 8,282 

006 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES .................................. 31,884 31,884 

011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ................................................ 409 409 

012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO .................................. 11,976 11,976 

013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .............................................. 2,447 2,447 

014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION ..................................... 7,692 7,692 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ......................................................... 13,461 13,461 

016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .................................................... 3,310 3,310 

017 40 MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 6,244 6,244 

018 60MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 3,368 3,368 

019 81MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 9,162 9,162 

020 120MM, ALL TYPES .......................................................................... 10,266 10,266 

021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................... 1,887 1,887 

022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 1,611 1,611 

023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .................................................................... 37,459 37,459 

024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES ................................................................. 970 970 

025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES ..................................... 418 418 

026 FUZE, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 14,219 14,219 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ....... 206,821 206,821 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

135 TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................................................................... 17,968 17,968 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ........................ 17,968 17,968 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS 

GUIDED MISSILES 

010 JAVELIN ............................................................................................. 29,334 29,334 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
447 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW ................................................................... 105 105 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 16,081 13,183 

TOW Unit Cost Growth ............................................................... [–2,898 ] 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT .................................................. 16,081 16,081 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

017 MODIFICATION KITS ...................................................................... 2,831 2,831 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................... 8,170 8,170 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................... 2,700 2,700 

026 RQ–11 UAV ......................................................................................... 2,830 2,830 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ............................................ 4,866 4,866 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS .......................................................... 265 265 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................... 114 114 

043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 523 523 

044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ............................................................ 365 365 

045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ................................................. 2,004 2,004 

047 EOD SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 42,930 42,930 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................... 385 385 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................... 129,584 126,686 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES ............. 94,050 94,050 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

052 U–2 MODS .......................................................................................... 11,300 11,300 

059 C–130 ................................................................................................... 1,618 1,618 

064 RC–135 ................................................................................................ 2,700 2,700 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ........................... 6,000 6,000 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....... 115,668 115,668 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

TACTICAL 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE ................................................... 24,200 24,200 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......... 24,200 24,200 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE 

ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ........................................................................................... 326 326 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ..................................................................................... 17,634 17,634 

BOMBS 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS ......................................................... 37,514 37,514 

005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ............................................ 84,459 84,459 

FLARES 

011 FLARES ............................................................................................... 14,973 14,973 

012 FUZES ................................................................................................. 3,859 3,859 

SMALL ARMS 

014 SMALL ARMS .................................................................................... 1,200 1,200 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR 

FORCE.

159,965 159,965 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ........................................ 1,800 1,800 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

046 MILSATCOM SPACE ........................................................................ 5,695 5,695 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
448 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ....................................................... 60,600 60,600 

061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 68,000 68,000 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. ........................... 58,250 58,250 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 2,380,501 2,380,501 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............. 2,574,846 2,574,846 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

012 TELEPORT PROGRAM ..................................................................... 4,760 4,760 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................................ 78,986 78,986 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

062 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT ..................................................... 2,841 2,841 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 13,300 13,300 

084 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS ................. 8,034 8,034 

089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................ 3,354 3,354 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE ................... 111,275 111,275 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ........................ 15,000 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–15,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS 

FUND.

15,000 0 

NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

999 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ................................................... 400,000 

Program increase ......................................................................... [400,000 ] 

TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT.400,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT ..................................................... 6,366,979 6,704,081 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, 

TEST, AND EVALUATION 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601101A IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH.21,803 21,803 

002 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ................................... 221,901 221,901 

003 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ......................... 79,359 79,359 

004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS 113,662 113,662 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 436,725 436,725 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

005 0602105A MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY .............................................. 26,585 26,585 

006 0602120A SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY ........... 43,170 43,170 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
449 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP ...................................................................... 36,293 36,293 

008 0602211A AVIATION TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 55,615 55,615 

009 0602270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ....................... 17,585 17,585 

010 0602303A MISSILE TECHNOLOGY .................................................... 51,528 51,528 

011 0602307A ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ........................... 26,162 26,162 

012 0602308A ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION .................. 24,063 24,063 

013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY.64,589 64,589 

014 0602618A BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY .............................................. 68,300 76,300 

WIAMan schedule adjustment ....................................... [8,000 ] 

015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING 

TECHNOLOGY.

4,490 4,490 

016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM ................... 7,818 7,818 

017 0602624A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ................ 37,798 37,798 

018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES ............... 59,021 59,021 

019 0602709A NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 43,426 43,426 

020 0602712A COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS ................................................ 20,574 20,574 

021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ..... 21,339 21,339 

022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ................ 20,316 20,316 

023 0602782A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY.34,209 34,209 

024 0602783A COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY ............... 10,439 10,439 

025 0602784A MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY .................... 70,064 70,064 

026 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY 17,654 17,654 

027 0602786A WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 31,546 31,546 

028 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 93,340 93,340 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 885,924 893,924 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

029 0603001A WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................... 56,056 56,056 

030 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................ 62,032 62,032 

031 0603003A AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........................... 81,080 81,080 

032 0603004A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.63,919 63,919 

033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

97,043 97,043 

034 0603006A SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 5,866 5,866 

035 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.7,800 7,800 

036 0603008A ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 40,416 40,416 

037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE ................................................................... 9,166 9,166 

038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS.13,627 13,627 

039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE .................................................................. 10,667 10,667 

041 0603125A COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.15,054 15,054 

042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL .................................................................... 3,194 3,194 

043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS .................................................................. 2,367 2,367 

044 0603270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ....................... 25,348 25,348 

045 0603313A MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ... 64,009 64,009 

046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE .................................................................. 11,083 11,083 

047 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.180,662 180,662 

048 0603606A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

22,806 22,806 

049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM ................... 5,030 5,030 

050 0603710A NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................. 36,407 36,407 

051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.11,745 11,745 

052 0603734A MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.23,717 23,717 

053 0603772A ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND 

SENSOR TECHNOLOGY.

33,012 33,012 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
450 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.882,106 882,106 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

054 0603305A ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION .. 15,301 15,301 

055 0603308A ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ........................ 13,592 13,592 

056 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV ....... 10,625 0 

Program deferred to fiscal year 2019 ............................ [–10,625 ] 

058 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION ............. 30,612 30,612 

059 0603653A ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) ......... 49,989 49,989 

060 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY ................... 6,703 6,703 

061 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM— 

ADV DEV.

6,894 6,894 

062 0603774A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.9,066 9,066 

063 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/ 

VAL.

2,633 2,633 

064 0603782A WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL—DEM/VAL.272,384 235,384 

Excess program growth .................................................. [–37,000 ] 

065 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 3,874 3,874 

066 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV ......................................................... 5,018 5,018 

067 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV 11,556 11,556 

069 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV ....................................... 15,603 15,603 

070 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .... 14,159 14,159 

071 0603850A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE ............................ 79 79 

072 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES ................. 55,605 55,605 

074 0604319A INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2).79,232 79,232 

075 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 

4).

4,476 4,476 

076 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS ............................................................ 28,991 0 

LEMV termination ......................................................... [–28,991 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.636,392 559,776 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

077 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ......................................................... 76,588 76,588 

078 0604220A ARMED, DEPLOYABLE HELOS ........................................ 73,309 73,309 

079 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 154,621 154,621 

080 0604280A JOINT TACTICAL RADIO ................................................... 31,826 31,826 

081 0604290A MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO 

(MNVR).

23,341 23,341 

082 0604321A ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM ................................... 4,839 4,839 

083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE .................................................................. 23,841 23,841 

084 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS ..................................... 79,855 90,855 

Transfer from WTCV line 15—XM25 development ...... [11,000 ] 

085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES ....................................... 2,140 2,140 

086 0604611A JAVELIN ................................................................................ 5,002 5,002 

087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES .................... 21,321 21,321 

088 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .................................................... 514 514 

093 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV ............................ 43,405 43,405 

094 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT ... 1,939 1,939 

095 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV ........... 18,980 18,980 

097 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV.18,294 18,294 

098 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.17,013 17,013 

099 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT ...... 6,701 6,701 

100 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)— 

ENG DEV.

14,575 14,575 

101 0604780A COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE 27,634 27,634 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
451 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

102 0604798A BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION.193,748 193,748 

103 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV ....................... 15,721 15,721 

104 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 41,703 41,703 

105 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV.7,379 7,379 

106 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV.39,468 39,468 

107 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV ............... 92,285 92,285 

108 0604814A ARTILLERY MUNITIONS—EMD ...................................... 8,209 8,209 

109 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE.22,958 22,958 

110 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 1,549 1,549 

111 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM 

(GFEBS).

17,342 227 

Excess to requirement ..................................................... [–17,115 ] 

112 0604823A FIREFINDER ........................................................................ 47,221 47,221 

113 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL .................. 48,477 48,477 

114 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD ........................................... 80,613 121,313 

Transfer from WTCV 6 at Army Request ..................... [40,700 ] 

117 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 68,814 68,814 

118 0605018A INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY 

(IPPS-A).

137,290 137,290 

119 0605028A ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) ........... 116,298 116,298 

120 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) ............. 68,148 68,148 

121 0605380A AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS) ........... 33,219 33,219 

122 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) .................... 15,127 15,127 

124 0605456A PAC–3/MSE MISSILE ......................................................... 68,843 68,843 

125 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE 

(AIAMD).

364,649 364,649 

126 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE ........................................... 592,201 592,201 

127 0605626A AERIAL COMMON SENSOR .............................................. 10,382 10,382 

128 0605766A NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) ......... 21,143 21,143 

129 0605812A JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

PH.

84,230 84,230 

130 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 ................................................................... 3,465 3,465 

131 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 10,806 10,806 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.2,857,026 2,891,611 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

132 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 16,934 16,934 

133 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................... 13,488 13,488 

134 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT .............................................. 46,672 46,672 

135 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER ................................................... 11,919 11,919 

136 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL ................................................ 193,658 193,658 

137 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM ................ 37,158 37,158 

139 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES ......................... 340,659 340,659 

140 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND 

TARGETS.

66,061 66,061 

141 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS ...................... 43,280 43,280 

143 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION ............................................. 6,025 6,025 

144 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES.7,349 7,349 

145 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ..................................... 19,809 19,809 

146 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS ............................. 5,941 5,941 

147 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING ......................... 55,504 55,504 

148 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER .......................................... 65,274 65,274 

149 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION 

& INTEG.

1,283 1,283 

150 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................ 82,035 82,035 

151 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES ..................... 33,853 33,853 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
452 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

152 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS 

AND SAFETY.

53,340 53,340 

153 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT 

SUPPORT.

5,193 5,193 

154 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................. 54,175 54,175 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..... 1,159,610 1,159,610 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

156 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............... 110,576 110,576 

157 0607141A LOGISTICS AUTOMATION ................................................ 3,717 3,717 

159 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT ............................. 70,053 70,053 

160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE ............................ 98,450 83,450 

JLENS program reduction ............................................ [–15,000 ] 

161 0203726A ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM .... 30,940 30,940 

162 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ........ 177,532 177,532 

163 0203740A MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM ..................................... 36,495 36,495 

164 0203744A AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS.257,187 271,248 

Transfer from APA 11 at Army request ........................ [14,061 ] 

165 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

315 315 

166 0203758A DIGITIZATION ..................................................................... 6,186 6,186 

167 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

1,578 1,578 

168 0203802A OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS.62,100 62,100 

169 0203808A TRACTOR CARD .................................................................. 18,778 18,778 

170 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM ............................. 7,108 7,108 

173 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES .............. 7,600 7,600 

174 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 9,357 9,357 

175 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 41,225 41,225 

176 0303142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) ............... 18,197 18,197 

177 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM.14,215 14,215 

179 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ................. 33,533 33,533 

180 0305208A DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.27,622 27,622 

181 0305219A MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS ................................................. 10,901 10,901 

182 0305232A RQ–11 UAV ............................................................................ 2,321 2,321 

183 0305233A RQ–7 UAV .............................................................................. 12,031 12,031 

185 0307665A BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE ...................... 12,449 12,449 

186 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES.56,136 56,136 

186A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 4,717 4,717 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.1,131,319 1,130,380 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, ARMY.

7,989,102 7,954,132 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ......................... 112,617 112,617 

002 0601152N IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH.18,230 18,230 

003 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ................................... 484,459 484,459 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 615,306 615,306 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ................ 104,513 104,513 

005 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ................. 145,307 145,307 

006 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY ..... 47,334 47,334 

007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH .................... 34,163 34,163 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
453 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

008 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH 49,689 49,689 

009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH.97,701 97,701 

010 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED 

RESEARCH.

45,685 60,685 

AGOR mid life refit ........................................................ [15,000 ] 

011 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH.6,060 6,060 

012 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ............... 103,050 103,050 

013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH.169,710 169,710 

014 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED 

RESEARCH.

31,326 31,326 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 834,538 849,538 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

015 0603114N POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 48,201 48,201 

016 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...... 28,328 28,328 

019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.56,179 56,179 

020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION 

(ATD).

132,400 132,400 

021 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.11,854 11,854 

022 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.247,931 247,931 

023 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY.4,760 4,760 

025 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS.51,463 51,463 

026 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED 

TECHNOLOGY.

2,000 2,000 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.583,116 583,116 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

027 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS ........................ 42,246 42,246 

028 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY .............................................. 5,591 5,591 

029 0603237N DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL ....... 3,262 3,262 

030 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS .......................................................... 74 74 

031 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 7,964 7,964 

032 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE ................... 5,257 5,257 

033 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY .......... 1,570 1,570 

034 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES.168,040 168,040 

035 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE ............................ 88,649 88,649 

036 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................. 83,902 83,902 

037 0603525N PILOT FISH .......................................................................... 108,713 108,713 

038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH ................................................................ 9,316 9,316 

039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER ............................................................ 77,108 77,108 

040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL ............................................... 762 762 

041 0603553N SURFACE ASW ..................................................................... 2,349 2,349 

042 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ... 852,977 852,977 

043 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS ............. 8,764 8,764 

044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN ............................. 20,501 20,501 

045 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES.27,052 27,052 

046 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ..................... 428,933 428,933 

047 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS ........... 27,154 22,902 

Program execution .......................................................... [–4,252 ] 

048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE ..................................................................... 519,140 519,140 

049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) ...................................... 406,389 406,389 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
454 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ................................... 36,570 18,530 

Late contract awards ...................................................... [–18,040 ] 

051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ......................................... 8,404 8,404 

052 0603611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES ........................... 136,967 122,967 

Program delay ................................................................ [–14,000 ] 

053 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM.1,489 1,489 

054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.38,422 38,422 

055 0603658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT ........................................ 69,312 64,012 

Common array block antenna contract delay ............... [–5,300 ] 

056 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.9,196 9,196 

057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION .................................... 18,850 18,850 

058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM ................................................ 45,618 45,618 

059 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT ............................................ 3,019 3,019 

060 0603734N CHALK CORAL ..................................................................... 144,951 144,951 

061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY .................................... 5,797 5,797 

062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE ................................................................ 308,131 308,131 

063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA ................................................................. 195,189 195,189 

064 0603751N RETRACT ELM ..................................................................... 56,358 56,358 

065 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN .............................................................. 55,378 55,378 

066 0603787N SPECIAL PROCESSES ........................................................ 48,842 48,842 

067 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 7,509 7,509 

068 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 5,075 0 

Early to need ................................................................... [–5,075 ] 

069 0603851M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING ................... 51,178 51,178 

070 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL.205,615 194,719 

JPALS 1B follow-on platform integration delay .......... [–7,437 ] 

JPALS 1B test early to need .......................................... [–3,459 ] 

072 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM).37,227 37,227 

073 0604279N ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION ...................... 169 169 

074 0604653N JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW).20,874 17,874 

Schedule delay ................................................................ [–3,000 ] 

075 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.2,257 2,257 

076 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT.38,327 38,327 

077 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT.135,985 105,985 

Adjust program to more realistic schedule ................... [–30,000 ] 

078 0605812M JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT 

PH.

50,362 50,362 

079 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP ........................... 8,448 4,908 

Program delay ................................................................ [–3,540 ] 

080 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP .......... 153 153 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.4,641,385 4,547,282 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

081 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 40,558 40,558 

082 0604214N AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV ........................................... 35,825 33,325 

Excess program management ........................................ [–2,500 ] 

083 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT .......................................... 99,891 99,891 

084 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT.17,565 17,565 

085 0604218N AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING .................... 4,026 4,026 

086 0604221N P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ................................... 1,791 1,791 

087 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM ......................................... 11,725 11,725 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
455 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

088 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM ....................................... 68,463 68,463 

089 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE ....................................................... 152,041 152,041 

090 0604245N H–1 UPGRADES ................................................................... 47,123 47,123 

091 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS ........................................ 30,208 30,208 

092 0604262N V–22A ..................................................................................... 43,084 43,084 

093 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................... 11,401 11,401 

094 0604269N EA–18 ..................................................................................... 11,138 11,138 

095 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 34,964 34,964 

096 0604273N VH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT ................ 94,238 94,238 

097 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) ............................. 257,796 257,796 

098 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRSNAVY).3,302 3,302 

099 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING.240,298 240,298 

100 0604311N LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ...................... 1,214 1,214 

101 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ..................................... 46,007 46,007 

102 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS ......................... 75,592 75,592 

103 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM ................................................................. 117,854 117,854 

104 0604376M MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION.10,080 10,080 

105 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER 

AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.

21,413 21,413 

106 0604404N UNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM.146,683 133,683 

Schedule delay ................................................................ [–13,000 ] 

107 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS ........................... 275,871 196,071 

Air and missile defense radar contract delay ............... [–79,800 ] 

108 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION .................. 89,672 89,672 

109 0604504N AIR CONTROL ...................................................................... 13,754 13,754 

110 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS .................................. 69,615 69,615 

112 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN .............................................................. 121,566 121,566 

113 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM ................ 49,143 49,143 

114 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E ................. 155,254 175,254 

Increased LHA–8 design efforts ..................................... [20,000 ] 

115 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES .................. 3,689 3,689 

116 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... 5,041 5,041 

117 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT .................. 26,444 26,444 

118 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT.8,897 8,897 

119 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND 

HUMAN FACTORS.

6,233 6,233 

120 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS ......................... 442 442 

121 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) ............. 130,360 130,360 

122 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) ............. 50,209 50,209 

123 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) ...... 164,799 114,799 

SEWIP block 3 program delay ...................................... [–50,000 ] 

124 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING ...................................... 1,984 1,984 

125 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT ................................................ 9,458 9,458 

126 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM ................................................ 51,430 51,430 

127 0604800M JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ........................... 512,631 502,631 

F–35B follow-on development ahead of need ................ [–10,000 ] 

128 0604800N JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ........................... 534,187 524,187 

F–35B follow-on development ahead of need ................ [–10,000 ] 

129 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 5,564 5,564 

130 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 69,659 62,823 

Unjustified request ......................................................... [–6,836 ] 

132 0605212N CH–53K RDTE ....................................................................... 503,180 503,180 

133 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) .................... 5,500 0 

Program uncertainty ...................................................... [–5,500 ] 

134 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) ........... 317,358 287,358 

P–8A spiral 2 development milestone B slip ................. [–30,000 ] 

135 0204202N DDG–1000 .............................................................................. 187,910 187,910 

136 0304231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP ............................ 2,140 2,140 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
456 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

137 0304785N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS ............................. 9,406 9,406 

138 0305124N SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM .............................. 22,800 22,800 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.5,028,476 4,840,840 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

139 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 43,261 43,261 

140 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................... 71,872 71,872 

141 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT .............................................. 38,033 38,033 

142 0605126N JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION.1,352 1,352 

143 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY ................ 5,566 5,566 

144 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES .................................... 48,345 48,345 

146 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES ........................ 637 637 

147 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL 

SUPPORT.

76,585 76,585 

148 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT ............................... 3,221 3,221 

149 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT.72,725 72,725 

150 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT ....................... 141,778 141,778 

151 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ............................... 331,219 331,219 

152 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY.16,565 16,565 

153 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) 

SUPPORT.

3,265 3,265 

154 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT 7,134 7,134 

155 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT ................ 24,082 24,082 

156 0305885N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES ......................... 497 497 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .................... 886,137 886,137 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

159 0604227N HARPOON MODIFICATIONS ............................................ 699 699 

160 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT.

20,961 20,961 

162 0604766M MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS .................................... 35 35 

163 0605525N CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON .. 2,460 2,460 

164 0605555N STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT ............................... 9,757 9,757 

165 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT ..... 98,057 98,057 

166 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ................. 31,768 31,768 

167 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 1,464 1,464 

168 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 21,729 21,729 

169 0203761N RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) .................... 13,561 13,561 

170 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS .......................................................... 131,118 131,118 

171 0204152N E–2 SQUADRONS ................................................................ 1,971 1,971 

172 0204163N FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) ............. 46,155 34,423 

Joint Aerial Layer Network program delay .................. [–11,732 ] 

173 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT ........................................................... 2,374 2,374 

174 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING 

CENTER (TMPC).

12,407 12,407 

175 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ....................... 41,609 41,609 

176 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT).7,240 7,240 

177 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) .... 78,208 78,208 

178 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.45,124 45,124 

179 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT .................................. 2,703 2,703 

180 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 19,563 19,563 

181 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT ...................................................... 13,586 13,586 

182 0205604N TACTICAL DATA LINKS ..................................................... 197,538 197,538 

183 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ...... 31,863 31,863 

184 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP ...................................................................... 12,806 12,806 

185 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS ............................................. 88,607 88,607 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
457 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

187 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ............... 116,928 116,928 

188 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ......... 178,753 178,753 

189 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING 

ARMS SYSTEMS.

139,594 118,719 

Marine Personnel Carrier program deferred ................ [–20,875 ] 

190 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT ......... 42,647 37,034 

Prior year carry over ...................................................... [–5,613 ] 

191 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE 

SYSTEMS (MIP).

34,394 34,394 

192 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................. 39,159 31,159 

Program delay ................................................................ [–8,000 ] 

193 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE 

(AMRAAM).

2,613 2,613 

194 0208058N JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ............................. 986 986 

199 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) ..................... 66,231 66,231 

200 0303138N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE 

SERVICES (CANES).

24,476 24,476 

201 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 23,531 23,531 

206 0305160N NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORSSPACE (METOC).742 742 

207 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES.4,804 4,804 

208 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ................. 8,381 8,381 

211 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.5,535 5,535 

212 0305208N DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.19,718 19,718 

213 0305220N RQ–4 UAV .............................................................................. 375,235 375,235 

214 0305231N MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................. 48,713 48,713 

215 0305232M RQ–11 UAV ............................................................................ 102 102 

216 0305233N RQ–7 UAV .............................................................................. 710 710 

217 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) .............. 5,013 5,013 

219 0305239M RQ–21A ................................................................................... 11,122 11,122 

220 0305241N MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT ...... 28,851 28,851 

221 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT .................... 5,116 5,116 

222 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) .................................... 28,042 28,042 

223 0708011N INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ........................................ 50,933 50,933 

224 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) ........................ 4,998 4,998 

224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 1,185,132 1,185,132 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.3,385,822 3,339,602 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, NAVY.

15,974,780 15,661,821 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ................................... 373,151 373,151 

002 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ......................... 138,333 138,333 

003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES ........ 13,286 13,286 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 524,770 524,770 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602102F MATERIALS .......................................................................... 116,846 116,846 

005 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES ....................... 119,672 119,672 

006 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH ........ 89,483 89,483 

007 0602203F AEROSPACE PROPULSION ............................................... 197,546 197,546 

008 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS ...................................................... 127,539 127,539 

009 0602601F SPACE TECHNOLOGY ........................................................ 104,063 104,063 

010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS ......................................... 81,521 81,521 

011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ............................... 112,845 112,845 

012 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS.138,161 138,161 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
458 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH ................................. 40,217 40,217 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 1,127,893 1,127,893 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

014 0603112F ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS ..... 39,572 49,572 

Program increase ............................................................ [10,000 ] 

015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) 12,800 12,800 

016 0603203F ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS ............................... 30,579 30,579 

017 0603211F AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO ...................... 77,347 77,347 

018 0603216F AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY.149,321 149,321 

019 0603270F ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY .......................... 49,128 49,128 

020 0603401F ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY ..................... 68,071 68,071 

021 0603444F MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) .......... 26,299 26,299 

022 0603456F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.20,967 20,967 

023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................. 33,996 33,996 

024 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ........................... 19,000 19,000 

025 0603680F MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ............. 41,353 41,353 

026 0603788F BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND 

DEMONSTRATION.

49,093 49,093 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.617,526 627,526 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .............. 3,983 3,983 

029 0603287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................... 3,874 3,874 

032 0603438F SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY .................................... 27,024 27,024 

033 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY .................. 15,899 15,899 

034 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ....................... 4,568 4,568 

035 0603791F INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D ............ 379 379 

036 0603830F SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) .......................... 28,764 28,764 

038 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/ 

VAL.

86,737 86,737 

040 0603859F POLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL ......................... 953 953 

042 0604015F LONG RANGE STRIKE ....................................................... 379,437 379,437 

044 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ................................................ 2,606 2,606 

045 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM.103 103 

047 0604337F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION ........ 16,018 16,018 

049 0604458F AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER .............................................. 58,861 58,861 

050 0604618F JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ............................... 2,500 2,500 

051 0604635F GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT 21,175 21,175 

052 0604857F OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE ........................ 10,000 

Program increase ............................................................ [10,000 ] 

053 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM ........................................ 13,636 13,636 

054 0105921F SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES.2,799 2,799 

055 0207455F THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR 

(3DELRR).

70,160 70,160 

056 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER 

EQUIPMENT) (SPACE).

137,233 137,233 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES.876,709 886,709 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

058 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .............. 977 977 

061 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING.3,601 3,601 

062 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ..................... 1,971 1,971 

064 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE ................. 51,456 51,456 

065 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ............................... 50 50 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
459 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

066 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD ......................... 115,000 115,000 

067 0604421F COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS ............................................. 23,930 23,930 

068 0604425F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS ................. 400,258 400,258 

069 0604429F AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK ................................. 4,575 4,575 

070 0604441F SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH 

EMD.

352,532 322,832 

Modernization projects execution delays excluding exploitation efforts.[–29,700 ] 

071 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................... 16,284 16,284 

072 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS .................................................................. 2,564 2,564 

073 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT ................................................ 17,036 17,036 

074 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS ................................................. 7,273 7,273 

075 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES .......................................... 33,200 33,200 

078 0604800F F–35—EMD ............................................................................ 816,335 816,335 

079 0604851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—EMD ..... 145,442 145,442 

080 0604853F EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD.27,963 27,963 

081 0604932F LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON ............................... 5,000 5,000 

082 0604933F ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION ........................................ 129,411 129,411 

083 0605213F F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B .................... 131,100 131,100 

084 0605221F KC–46 ..................................................................................... 1,558,590 1,558,590 

085 0605229F CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION .................................. 393,558 333,558 

Program delays / projected savings pending updated 

program estimate.

[–60,000 ] 

086 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E .............................................. 6,242 6,242 

087 0605431F ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) ......................... 272,872 272,872 

088 0605432F POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) ........................................... 124,805 124,805 

089 0605433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) ......................... 13,948 13,948 

090 0605931F B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .................... 303,500 303,500 

091 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION ....................... 67,874 67,874 

094 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING .............................. 4,663 4,663 

097 0401318F CV–22 ..................................................................................... 46,705 46,705 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.5,078,715 4,989,015 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

099 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT .......................... 17,690 17,690 

100 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT .............................................. 34,841 34,841 

101 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE ............................................ 32,956 32,956 

103 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION ........... 13,610 13,610 

104 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ............................... 742,658 742,658 

105 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) ....... 14,203 14,203 

106 0605864F SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) ......................................... 13,000 13,000 

107 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT.44,160 44,160 

108 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT.27,643 27,643 

109 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE.13,935 13,935 

110 0606392F SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN 

WORKFORCE.

192,348 192,348 

111 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............ 28,647 28,647 

112 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING ............................................. 315 315 

114 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES ......................................... 3,785 3,785 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .................... 1,179,791 1,179,791 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

115 0603423F GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL 

CONTROL SEGMENT.

383,500 383,500 

117 0604445F WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE ........................................... 5,000 5,000 

118 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM 

(AF-IPPS).

90,097 90,097 

119 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY 32,086 32,086 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
460 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

121 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS .............................................................. 24,007 24,007 

122 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ................... 450 450 

123 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS .............................................................. 19,589 19,589 

124 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS ................................................................ 100,194 100,194 

125 0101313F STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM ..... 37,448 37,448 

128 0102326F REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER 

MODERNIZATION PROGRAM.

1,700 1,700 

130 0203761F WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS 

(WRAP) RAPID TRANSITION FUND.

3,844 3,844 

131 0205219F MQ–9 UAV ............................................................................. 128,328 128,328 

133 0207131F A–10 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 9,614 9,614 

134 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 177,298 177,298 

135 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS ............................................................ 244,289 244,289 

136 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION ...................... 13,138 13,138 

137 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS ............................................................ 328,542 328,542 

138 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS ............................................................... 33,000 33,000 

139 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................. 15,460 15,460 

140 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE 

(AMRAAM).

84,172 84,172 

142 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY ............................... 2,582 2,582 

143 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE ................................. 542 542 

144 0207247F AF TENCAP ........................................................................... 89,816 89,816 

145 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT ........ 1,075 1,075 

146 0207253F COMPASS CALL ................................................................... 10,782 10,782 

147 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT 

PROGRAM.

139,369 139,369 

149 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE 

(JASSM).

6,373 6,373 

150 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) ................. 22,820 22,820 

151 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) ................ 7,029 7,029 

152 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM 

(AWACS).

186,256 186,256 

153 0207418F TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS ................. 743 743 

156 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES .. 4,471 4,471 

158 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD .......................... 10,250 10,250 

159 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK ........................................... 1,431 1,431 

160 0207449F COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION .... 7,329 7,329 

161 0207452F DCAPES ................................................................................. 15,081 15,081 

162 0207581F JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR 

SYSTEM (JSTARS).

13,248 23,148 

Continue T–3 testing operations .................................... [9,900 ] 

163 0207590F SEEK EAGLE ........................................................................ 24,342 24,342 

164 0207601F USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION ............................ 10,448 10,448 

165 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS ................. 5,512 5,512 

166 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES ................. 3,301 3,301 

167 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ....................................... 62,605 62,605 

169 0208059F CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES ....................................... 68,099 68,099 

170 0208087F AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ............... 14,047 14,047 

171 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ............... 5,853 5,853 

179 0301400F SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE .......................... 12,197 12,197 

180 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER 

(NAOC).

18,267 18,267 

181 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN).36,288 36,288 

182 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 90,231 100,231 

ASACoE program ........................................................... [10,000 ] 

183 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 725 725 

185 0303601F MILSATCOM TERMINALS ................................................. 140,170 140,170 

187 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE ................................... 117,110 117,110 

190 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) ........... 4,430 4,430 

191 0305103F CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 2,048 2,048 

192 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER ........................................... 288 288 

193 0305110F SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) .................. 35,698 35,698 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
461 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

194 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE ........................................................... 24,667 24,667 

195 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING 

SYSTEM (ATCALS).

35,674 35,674 

196 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS ............................................................... 21,186 21,186 

199 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES ............. 195 195 

200 0305145F ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION ............................ 1,430 1,430 

201 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.330 330 

206 0305173F SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER.3,696 3,696 

207 0305174F SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID 

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.

2,469 2,469 

208 0305179F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) .................. 8,289 8,289 

209 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) ........................... 13,345 13,345 

211 0305202F DRAGON U–2 ........................................................................ 18,700 18,700 

212 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ........... 3,000 3,000 

213 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .................... 37,828 50,328 

Blue Devil Replacement WAMI/NVDF ......................... [12,500 ] 

214 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS ....................... 13,491 13,491 

215 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.7,498 7,498 

216 0305219F MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV ................................................... 3,326 3,326 

217 0305220F RQ–4 UAV .............................................................................. 134,406 114,406 

Multiple execution delays ............................................... [–20,000 ] 

218 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING 7,413 7,413 

219 0305236F COMMON DATA LINK (CDL) ............................................. 40,503 40,503 

220 0305238F NATO AGS ............................................................................. 264,134 264,134 

221 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE .................................. 23,016 23,016 

222 0305265F GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ................................................. 221,276 221,276 

223 0305614F JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM ................................................. 58,523 58,523 

224 0305881F RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION ........................................... 2,218 2,218 

226 0305913F NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) .......................... 50,547 50,547 

227 0305940F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS .......... 18,807 18,807 

229 0308699F SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) ................................... 1,079 1,079 

230 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON .............................................. 400 73,700 

C–130 AMP ..................................................................... [47,300 ] 

C–130H Propulsion System Propeller Upgrades .......... [26,000 ] 

231 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) ........................................ 61,492 61,492 

232 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) ............................................................ 109,134 109,134 

233 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM ............................................................... 22,443 22,443 

234 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES 

(LAIRCM).

4,116 4,116 

238 0401314F OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT ................................. 44,553 44,553 

239 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL ..................... 6,213 6,213 

240 0702207F DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) .................................... 1,605 1,605 

242 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) ... 95,238 95,238 

243 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ............................ 10,925 10,925 

244 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING ............................................... 1,347 1,347 

245 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES ................................... 65 65 

246 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY .................... 1,083 1,083 

247 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM .......................... 1,577 1,577 

248 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION ..................................... 5,990 5,990 

249 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY .......... 786 786 

250 0901279F FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE ............. 654 654 

251 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.135,735 135,735 

252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 11,874,528 11,874,528 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.16,297,542 16,383,242 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, AF.

25,702,946 25,718,946 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
462 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW 

BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE ............................ 45,837 45,837 

002 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ................................... 315,033 315,033 

003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES ..................................... 11,171 11,171 

004 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH 

SCIENCE.

49,500 49,500 

005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM ............ 84,271 84,271 

006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS.30,895 35,895 

Program increase ............................................................ [5,000 ] 

007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 51,426 51,426 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH .................................. 588,133 593,133 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ................................ 20,065 20,065 

009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 114,790 114,790 

011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM ......... 46,875 41,875 

MIT LL reduction ........................................................... [–5,000 ] 

013 0602251D8Z APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF 

S&T PRIORITIES.

45,000 40,000 

PSC S&T reduction ........................................................ [–5,000 ] 

014 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 413,260 415,760 

Plan X increase ............................................................... [2,500 ] 

015 0602304E COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS .............................. 16,330 16,330 

017 0602383E BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE ................................. 24,537 24,537 

018 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 227,065 217,065 

Program decrease ........................................................... [–10,000 ] 

020 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH ........................................ 18,908 18,908 

021 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) APPLIED RESEARCH.2,500 

HSCB Apl Res extension ................................................ [2,500 ] 

022 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY ................................................. 225,977 225,977 

023 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY ........... 166,654 166,654 

024 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 243,469 243,469 

025 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES.175,282 175,282 

026 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH.11,107 11,107 

027 1160401BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.29,246 29,246 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 1,778,565 1,763,565 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

028 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......... 26,646 21,646 

Program decrease ........................................................... [–5,000 ] 

029 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ............................. 19,420 19,420 

030 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT 77,792 77,792 

031 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT.274,033 274,033 

032 0603175C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ........... 309,203 214,203 

Advanced Technology—unsustainable growth ............. [–20,000 ] 

Common Kill VehicleTechnology—transfer to line 

032X.

[–70,000 ] 

Directed energy—DPALS ............................................... [–5,000 ] 

032X 0603XXXC COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ...................... 100,000 

Common Kill Vehicle Technology—transfer from line 

032.

[70,000 ] 

Increase for CKVT design and development ................. [30,000 ] 

034 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.19,305 19,305 

035 0603264S AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 

(AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY.

7,565 7,565 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
463 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

036 0603274C SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY ................... 40,426 40,426 

037 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS ............................... 149,804 149,804 

038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY ....................... 172,546 172,546 

039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.170,847 170,847 

040 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........ 9,009 9,009 

041 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.174,428 167,428 

Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts ........... [–7,000 ] 

042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES ..... 20,000 5,000 

Net Comm reduction ...................................................... [–15,000 ] 

045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH .................. 19,668 19,668 

046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT.2,500 

HSCB Adv Dev extension ............................................... [2,500 ] 

047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND 

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM.

34,041 59,041 

IBIF ................................................................................. [25,000 ] 

048 0603699D8Z EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.61,971 53,971 

Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts ........... [–8,000 ] 

050 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS.20,000 20,000 

051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE 

TECHNOLOGY.

30,256 30,256 

052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM.72,324 72,324 

053 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT.82,700 82,700 

054 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM ................................... 8,431 8,431 

055 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES .............. 117,080 117,080 

057 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS.

239,078 239,078 

059 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .......... 259,006 259,006 

060 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY .................................................... 286,364 286,364 

061 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.12,116 12,116 

062 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE ........................ 19,008 19,008 

063 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS ........................ 78,532 68,532 

Quick & Rapid Reaction Fund reduction ..................... [–10,000 ] 

065 0603828J JOINT EXPERIMENTATION ............................................. 12,667 12,667 

066 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE.

41,370 41,370 

069 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ..... 92,508 92,508 

070 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT.52,001 52,001 

071 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS ................................................................. 52,053 55,053 

Program increase ............................................................ [3,000 ] 

072 1160402BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY 

DEVELOPMENT.

46,809 46,809 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.3,109,007 3,099,507 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND 

PROTOTYPES 

075 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P.63,641 63,641 

076 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH ................................................................ 19,152 19,152 

077 0603600D8Z WALKOFF .............................................................................. 70,763 70,763 

079 0603714D8Z ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM ........ 17,230 19,230 

Sustain testing effort ...................................................... [2,000 ] 

080 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.71,453 71,453 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
464 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

081 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT.268,990 268,990 

082 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT.1,033,903 1,133,903 

Continue activities relative to site evaluation, EIS, 

and planning.

[20,000 ] 

FTG-07 failure review board and return to flight ........ [80,000 ] 

083 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL.196,237 196,237 

084 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS .................... 315,183 395,183 

Additional homeland missile defense radar ................. [30,000 ] 

Enhanced discrimination capability ............................. [50,000 ] 

086 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS ........................................... 377,605 377,605 

087 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA ............................................. 286,613 286,613 

088 0603892C AEGIS BMD ........................................................................... 937,056 937,056 

089 0603893C SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .......... 44,947 44,947 

090 0603895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS.6,515 6,515 

091 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND 

CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND 

COMMUNICATI.

418,355 418,355 

092 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER 

SUPPORT.

47,419 47,419 

093 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS 

CENTER (MDIOC).

52,131 52,131 

094 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH ........................................................ 13,864 13,864 

095 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) ................................. 44,478 44,478 

096 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS ............................. 95,782 283,782 

Arrow Weapon System Improvements ........................... [33,700 ] 

Arrow–3 Interceptor ........................................................ [22,100 ] 

David’s Sling short-range BMD .................................... [117,200 ] 

US co-production capability for Iron Dome parts and 

components.

[15,000 ] 

097 0603914C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST ............................ 375,866 375,866 

098 0603915C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS .................... 495,257 495,257 

099 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ............................................ 11,704 11,704 

100 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE ....................................................... 9,842 9,842 

101 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM 3,312 13,312 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ............ [10,000 ] 

102 0604250D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES ................. 130,000 100,000 

Decrease to SCO efforts .................................................. [–30,000 ] 

103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT.8,300 8,300 

104 0604445J WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE ........................................... 30,000 30,000 

105 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING.2,500 

HSCB Modeling R&E extension .................................... [2,500 ] 

106 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM .................. 200,000 

Rapid Innovation Program ............................................ [200,000 ] 

108 0604787J JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ..................................... 7,402 7,402 

110 0604828J JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM.7,506 7,506 

111 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) ............................................ 129,374 129,374 

112 0604881C AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT ............... 308,522 308,522 

115 0303191D8Z JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) 

PROGRAM.

3,169 3,169 

116 0305103C CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 946 946 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES.5,902,517 6,455,017 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 

118 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD.8,155 8,155 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
465 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

119 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT.65,440 65,440 

120 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD.451,306 451,306 

122 0604764K ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE 

(AITS-JPO).

29,138 29,138 

123 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION 

SYSTEM (JTIDS).

19,475 19,475 

124 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES.12,901 12,901 

125 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .......... 13,812 13,812 

126 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE ...... 386 386 

127 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM ......................... 3,763 3,763 

128 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES .................... 6,788 6,788 

129 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND 

DEMONSTRATION.

27,917 27,917 

130 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION ................................ 22,297 22,297 

131 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL 

SYSTEM.

51,689 51,689 

132 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES.6,184 6,184 

133 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................... 12,083 12,083 

134 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM).3,302 3,302 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION.734,636 734,636 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

135 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) 6,393 6,393 

136 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT ... 2,479 2,479 

137 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT 

DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP).

240,213 240,213 

138 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS .............................. 2,127 2,127 

139 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR ................................................................ 8,287 8,287 

140 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY 

(JMETC).

31,000 31,000 

141 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS ..... 24,379 24,379 

143 0605117D8Z FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION.54,311 54,311 

144 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE 

ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO).

47,462 47,462 

146 0605130D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING ............................... 12,134 12,134 

147 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ................................................. 44,237 44,237 

148 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD ................... 5,871 5,871 

149 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY ................. 5,028 5,028 

150 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION.6,301 6,301 

151 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) .......... 6,504 6,504 

152 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM 92,046 92,046 

158 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ 

SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (S.

1,868 1,868 

159 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS .............................. 8,362 8,362 

160 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 

(DTIC).

56,024 56,024 

161 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING 

AND EVALUATION.

6,908 6,908 

162 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION .................... 15,451 19,451 

Program increase ............................................................ [4,000 ] 

164 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................. 71,659 71,659 

165 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS .................... 4,083 4,083 

167 0203345D8Z DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE 

(DOSI).

5,306 5,306 

168 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT .......................... 2,097 2,097 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
466 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

172 0303166J SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES.8,394 8,394 

175 0305193D8Z CYBER INTELLIGENCE ..................................................... 7,624 7,624 

178 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING 

TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2).

43,247 43,247 

179 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA ................................................. 37,712 37,712 

180 0901598D8W MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS ......................... 607 607 

181A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 54,914 54,914 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .................... 913,028 917,028 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 

182 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) ....................... 7,552 7,552 

183 0605127T REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND 

PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA.

3,270 3,270 

184 0605147T OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED 

INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS).

287 287 

185 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT 

SUPPORT.

14,000 14,000 

186 0607310D8Z OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ................... 1,955 1,955 

187 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS).13,250 13,250 

188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT).13,026 13,026 

190 0607828J JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ....... 12,652 12,652 

191 0208043J PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) ........ 3,061 3,061 

192 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY ................................................... 72,726 72,726 

194 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING.6,524 6,524 

201 0302016K NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE 

SUPPORT.

512 512 

202 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING 

AND INTEGRATION.

12,867 12,867 

203 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS ........................ 36,565 36,565 

204 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN).13,144 13,144 

205 0303135G PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) .......................... 1,060 1,060 

206 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) ........... 33,279 33,279 

207 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 10,673 10,673 

208 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ........ 181,567 181,567 

210 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM ............. 34,288 34,288 

211 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION ........................ 7,741 7,741 

212 0303170K NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ......... 3,325 3,325 

213 0303260D8Z DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO).1,246 1,246 

214 0303610K TELEPORT PROGRAM ....................................................... 5,147 5,147 

216 0304210BB SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES ....... 17,352 17,352 

220 0305103K CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ........................................ 3,658 3,658 

221 0305125D8Z CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) ..... 9,752 9,752 

225 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS .................................................. 3,210 4,210 

CRRC extension .............................................................. [1,000 ] 

227 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY ............................................................... 21,602 21,602 

230 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.5,195 5,195 

233 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS.3,348 3,348 

235 0305219BB MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV ................................................... 641 641 

238 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 

PROGRAM.

2,338 2,338 

239 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY 

AND ARCHITECTURES.

4,372 4,372 

247 0708011S INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ........................................ 24,691 24,691 

248 0708012S LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ................................. 4,659 4,659 

249 0902298J MANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS ................................................ 3,533 3,533 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
467 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

250 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV ............................................................................. 1,314 13,314 

Capability Improvements ............................................... [12,000 ] 

254 1160403BB AVIATION SYSTEMS .......................................................... 156,561 156,561 

256 1160405BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS 

DEVELOPMENT.

7,705 7,705 

257 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS .......................... 42,620 42,620 

261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS ........................................................... 17,970 17,970 

262 1160432BB SPECIAL PROGRAMS ......................................................... 7,424 7,424 

268 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES ................................................ 2,206 2,206 

271 1160483BB MARITIME SYSTEMS ......................................................... 18,325 19,481 

CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request .................. [1,156 ] 

274 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES .... 3,304 3,304 

275 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE.16,021 16,021 

275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................. 3,773,704 3,773,704 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT.4,641,222 4,655,378 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, DW.

17,667,108 18,218,264 

OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION ...................... 75,720 75,720 

002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION .............................. 48,423 48,423 

003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES ... 62,157 62,157 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT .................... 186,300 186,300 

TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE.186,300 186,300 

TOTAL RDT&E ......................................................... 67,520,236 67,739,463 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR 

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES ...................... 7,000 7,000 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION.7,000 7,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, ARMY.

7,000 7,000 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................... 34,426 34,426 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.34,426 34,426 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, NAVY.

34,426 34,426 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................... 9,000 9,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT.9,000 9,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
468 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program 

Element Item FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, AF.

9,000 9,000 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 

275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................... 66,208 66,208 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT.66,208 66,208 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & 

EVAL, DW.

66,208 66,208 

TOTAL RDT&E .......................................................... 116,634 116,634 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND 

MAINTENANCE 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ...................................................... 888,114 1,059,114 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [171,000 ] 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............................. 72,624 72,624 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 617,402 617,402 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 602,262 602,262 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................. 1,032,484 1,032,484 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ....................................................... 1,287,462 1,303,262 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [15,800 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........ 3,559,656 3,768,656 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [209,000 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................... 454,477 454,477 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 1,481,156 1,706,156 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [225,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................. 7,278,154 7,278,154 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 2,754,712 3,011,712 

Realignment of Arlington National Cemetary operations .................................................................. [–25,000 ] 

Sustainment to 90% ................................................. [282,000 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ............. 425,271 425,271 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 185,064 185,064 

170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS .......................................................................... 463,270 463,270 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 21,102,108 21,979,908 

MOBILIZATION 

180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY ................................................ 360,240 360,240 

190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS ............................ 192,105 192,105 

200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS .................................. 7,101 7,101 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION .............................. 559,446 559,446 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
469 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

210 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 115,992 115,992 

220 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 52,323 52,323 

230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING ................................ 43,589 43,589 

240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS 453,745 453,745 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................... 1,034,495 1,034,495 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 1,016,876 1,016,876 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 186,565 186,565 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 652,514 652,514 

290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 485,500 485,500 

300 EXAMINING ................................................................... 170,912 170,912 

310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 251,523 251,523 

320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 184,422 184,422 

330 JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................... 181,105 181,105 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 4,829,561 4,829,561 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 690,089 690,089 

360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ................................ 774,120 774,120 

370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ............................. 651,765 651,765 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT .................................. 453,051 453,051 

390 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 487,737 487,737 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 1,563,115 1,563,115 

410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 326,853 326,853 

420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ................................ 234,364 234,364 

430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ....................................... 1,212,091 1,212,091 

440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES ........................................ 243,540 243,540 

450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT .................................. 241,101 241,101 

460 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................. 226,291 226,291 

470 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS ........................... 426,651 457,851 

Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters from O&M Defense-wide ....................... [31,200 ] 

480 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS .................... 27,248 27,248 

525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................ 1,023,946 1,023,946 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 8,581,962 8,613,162 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

530 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –284,300 

Average civilian end strength above projection ...... [–284,300 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –284,300 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY ................................................................ 35,073,077 35,697,777 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ...................................................... 1,621 1,621 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............................. 24,429 24,429 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 657,099 657,099 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 122,485 122,485 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................. 584,058 584,058 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ....................................................... 79,380 79,380 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........ 471,616 471,616 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................... 74,243 74,243 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
470 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 70,894 146,694 

Army Reserve identified shortfall—restore unjustified efficiency reduction ........................................ [75,800 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................. 569,801 569,801 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 294,145 330,545 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [36,400 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ............. 51,853 51,853 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 3,001,624 3,113,824 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 10,735 10,735 

140 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 24,197 24,197 

150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 10,304 10,304 

160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 10,319 10,319 

170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 37,857 37,857 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 93,412 93,412 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY RES ....................................................... 3,095,036 3,207,236 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ...................................................... 800,880 800,880 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES .............................. 178,650 178,650 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE .................................... 771,503 771,503 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS .......................................... 98,699 98,699 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................. 38,779 38,779 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ....................................................... 922,503 922,503 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........ 761,056 761,056 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS .................... 62,971 62,971 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................. 233,105 233,105 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................. 1,019,059 1,019,059 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 712,139 786,339 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [74,200 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ............. 1,013,715 1,000,418 

Army National Guard identified severance pay excess to requirement ............................................... [–13,297 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 6,613,059 6,673,962 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 10,812 10,812 

140 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT .................................. 1,551 1,551 

150 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 78,284 78,284 

160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 46,995 46,995 

170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ...................................... 6,390 6,390 

180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 297,105 297,105 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 441,137 441,137 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

190 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –15,000 

Unjustified Growth For Civilian Personnel Compensation ............................................................... [–15,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –15,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
471 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARNG ................................................................ 7,054,196 7,100,099 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ....... 4,952,522 4,985,022 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [32,500 ] 

020 FLEET AIR TRAINING ................................................. 1,826,404 1,826,404 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING 

SERVICES ................................................................... 38,639 38,639 

040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ............ 90,030 90,030 

050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ............................................. 362,700 362,700 

060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................... 915,881 955,881 

Navy Unfunded Requirement for Air Depot Maintenance ................................................................... [40,000 ] 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........... 35,838 35,838 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ................................................. 379,914 379,914 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ............ 3,884,836 3,995,736 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [99,500 ] 

Spares ........................................................................ [11,400 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ........... 734,852 734,852 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... 5,191,511 5,191,511 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ..................... 1,351,274 1,381,274 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [30,000 ] 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .................................... 701,316 701,316 

140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE ............................................. 97,710 97,710 

150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE ................. 172,330 172,330 

160 WARFARE TACTICS ...................................................... 454,682 454,682 

170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ......................................................................... 328,406 328,406 

180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................... 946,429 1,083,297 

Navy Unfunded Requirement for Navy Expeditionary Combat Enterprise Reset/Depot ............. [148,000 ] 

Unjustified growth for human resources functions [–11,132 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE .................................... 142,249 142,249 

200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................... 2,603 2,603 

210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 102,970 102,970 

220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT .................................................................... 199,128 199,128 

230 CRUISE MISSILE .......................................................... 92,671 92,671 

240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE ....................................... 1,193,188 1,193,188 

250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ......... 105,985 105,985 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ......................................... 532,627 532,627 

270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT .................... 304,160 304,160 

280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION .................................... 1,011,528 1,011,528 

290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 1,996,821 2,132,821 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [136,000 ] 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 4,460,918 4,460,918 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 32,610,122 33,096,390 

MOBILIZATION 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE ...................... 331,576 331,576 

320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ........... 6,638 6,638 

330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ..................... 222,752 222,752 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS 73,310 73,310 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
472 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS .......................................... 2,675 2,675 

360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ........................................... 23,794 23,794 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION .............................. 660,745 660,745 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

370 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 148,516 148,516 

380 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 9,384 9,384 

390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS ................. 139,876 139,876 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................... 630,069 630,069 

410 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 9,294 9,294 

420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 169,082 169,082 

430 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 164,368 164,368 

440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 241,733 242,833 

Naval Sea Cadets ..................................................... [1,100 ] 

450 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 139,815 139,815 

460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 94,632 94,632 

470 JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................... 51,373 51,373 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 1,798,142 1,799,242 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 886,088 886,088 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS .............................................. 13,131 13,131 

500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 115,742 115,742 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 382,150 382,150 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ................................ 268,403 268,403 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 317,293 317,293 

550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 207,128 207,128 

570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .............. 295,855 295,855 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..... 1,140,484 1,140,484 

590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT ............................................................................ 52,873 52,873 

600 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS ................................. 27,587 27,587 

610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS .. 75,728 75,728 

620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ............................ 543,026 543,026 

680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES ............................................................................. 4,965 4,965 

705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................ 545,775 545,775 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 4,876,228 4,876,228 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

710 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –30,000 

Average civilian end strength above projection ...... [–30,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –30,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY ................................................................. 39,945,237 40,402,605 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE 

CORPS 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES .............................................. 837,012 912,012 

Crisis Response Force ............................................... [40,000 ] 

Marine Security Guard ............................................ [35,000 ] 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS ........................................................ 894,555 894,555 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
473 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 223,337 279,337 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [56,000 ] 

040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING ................................... 97,878 97,878 

050 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................................................. 774,619 774,619 

060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 2,166,661 2,166,661 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 4,994,062 5,125,062 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

070 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 17,693 17,693 

080 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 896 896 

090 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................... 100,806 100,806 

100 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 46,928 46,928 

110 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 356,426 356,426 

120 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 179,747 179,747 

130 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 52,255 52,255 

140 JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................... 23,138 23,138 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 777,889 777,889 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 43,816 43,816 

160 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 305,107 305,107 

180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..... 87,500 87,500 

185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................ 46,276 46,276 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 482,699 482,699 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

MARINE CORPS ............................................ 6,254,650 6,385,650 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ....... 586,620 588,520 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [1,900 ] 

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .............................. 7,008 7,008 

040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .......................... 100,657 109,557 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [8,900 ] 

050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........... 305 305 

060 AVIATION LOGISTICS ................................................. 3,927 3,927 

070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ............ 75,933 75,933 

080 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ........... 601 601 

090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................... 44,364 44,364 

100 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .................................... 15,477 15,477 

110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................... 115,608 115,608 

120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE ......................................... 1,967 1,967 

130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION .................................... 43,726 43,726 

140 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 69,011 74,011 

Sustainment to 90% ................................................. [5,000 ] 

150 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 109,604 109,604 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 1,174,808 1,190,608 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

160 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 2,905 2,905 

170 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 14,425 14,425 

180 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 2,485 2,485 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
474 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

190 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..... 3,129 3,129 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 22,944 22,944 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY RES ........................................................ 1,197,752 1,213,552 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES ................................................... 96,244 96,244 

020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 17,581 17,581 

030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 32,438 32,738 

Sustainment to 90% ................................................. [300 ] 

040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ..................................... 95,259 95,259 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 241,522 241,822 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

050 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .......................... 894 894 

060 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 11,743 11,743 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 9,158 9,158 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 21,795 21,795 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

MC RESERVE ................................................. 263,317 263,617 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...................................... 3,295,814 3,442,614 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [146,800 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ......................... 1,875,095 1,875,095 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN 

SKILLS) ....................................................................... 1,559,109 1,579,109 

Increase for ranges ................................................... [20,000 ] 

040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 5,956,304 6,146,304 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [190,000 ] 

050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 1,834,424 1,934,738 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [100,314 ] 

060 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 2,779,811 2,779,811 

070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ........................ 913,841 911,329 

Remove program growth for foreign currency fluctuation ................................................................... [–2,512 ] 

080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ................... 916,837 916,837 

100 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ............................................................................. 720,349 720,349 

110 LAUNCH FACILITIES ................................................... 305,275 305,275 

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ...................................... 433,658 433,658 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT .................................................................... 1,146,016 1,146,016 

140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS 231,830 231,830 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 21,968,363 22,422,965 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ................................................ 2,015,902 2,015,902 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ............................. 147,216 147,216 

170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 1,556,232 1,556,232 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
475 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 167,402 167,402 

190 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 707,040 707,040 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION .............................. 4,593,792 4,593,792 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................. 102,334 102,334 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING .................................................... 17,733 17,733 

220 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ... 94,600 94,600 

230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 217,011 217,011 

240 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 800,327 800,327 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ............................... 399,364 399,364 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING ....................................................... 792,275 792,275 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ..... 248,958 248,958 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................... 106,741 106,741 

290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 319,331 339,331 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [20,000 ] 

300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 122,736 122,736 

310 EXAMINING ................................................................... 3,679 3,679 

320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ............ 137,255 137,255 

330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING .................. 176,153 176,153 

340 JUNIOR ROTC ............................................................... 67,018 67,018 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 3,605,515 3,625,515 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ........................................... 1,103,684 1,103,684 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ......................... 919,923 919,923 

370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 56,601 56,601 

380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 281,061 281,061 

390 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 1,203,305 1,198,128 

Unjustified increase for public-private competitions ....................................................................... [–5,177 ] 

400 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 593,865 593,865 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ......................... 574,609 574,609 

420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ......................... 1,028,600 1,028,600 

430 CIVIL AIR PATROL ....................................................... 24,720 24,720 

460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ....................................... 89,008 89,008 

465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................ 1,227,796 1,227,796 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES .. 7,103,172 7,097,995 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... –200,000 

Average civilian end strength above projection ...... [–200,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... –200,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

AIR FORCE ...................................................... 37,270,842 37,540,267 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...................................... 1,857,951 1,857,951 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................ 224,462 220,062 

Unjustified growth in civilian personnel compensation ............................................................... [–4,400 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
476 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 521,182 521,182 

040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 89,704 98,674 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [8,970 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 360,836 360,836 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 3,054,135 3,058,705 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 64,362 64,362 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 15,056 15,056 

080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) 23,617 23,617 

090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) ........ 6,618 6,618 

100 AUDIOVISUAL ............................................................... 819 819 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND 

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ........................... 110,472 110,472 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

AF RESERVE .................................................. 3,164,607 3,169,177 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS ............................................ 3,371,871 3,371,871 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................ 720,305 720,305 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................... 1,514,870 1,514,870 

040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION ..................................................... 296,953 325,153 

Readiness funding increase ..................................... [28,200 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ............................................................. 597,303 597,303 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 6,501,302 6,529,502 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 32,117 32,117 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ............................ 32,585 32,585 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES .................................... 64,702 64,702 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ANG ................................................................... 6,566,004 6,594,204 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSEWIDE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ........................................... 472,239 472,239 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .......................... 5,261,463 5,233,611 

AFSOC Flying Hour Program ................................. [70,100 ] 

International SOF Information Sharing System ... [–7,017 ] 

Ongoing baseline contingency operations ............... [–35,519 ] 

Other Operations—military construction collateral 

equipment non-recurring costs ............................. [–5,000 ] 

Pilot program for SOF family members ................. [5,000 ] 

Preserve the force and families—human performance program ........................................................ [–11,605 ] 

Preserve the force and families—resiliency ............ [–8,786 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
477 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters to O&M, Army ....................................... [–31,200 ] 

Regional SOF Coordination Centers ....................... [–14,725 ] 

USASOC Flying Hour Program .............................. [18,000 ] 

USSOCOM NCR Contractor Support ..................... [–7,100 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ................... 5,733,702 5,705,850 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

040 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY .................... 157,397 157,397 

050 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY ......................... 84,899 84,899 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ... 242,296 242,296 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS ..................................... 144,443 166,142 

STARBASE ............................................................... [21,699 ] 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ................... 612,207 583,207 

Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent 

Targets ................................................................... [–29,000 ] 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ... 1,378,606 1,319,606 

Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent 

Targets ................................................................... [–59,000 ] 

110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY ............ 763,091 763,091 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ...... 1,326,243 1,326,243 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY .................... 29,933 29,933 

150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ................................. 462,545 451,517 

Cost of DISA computing service rates ..................... [–11,028 ] 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ....................................... 222,979 222,979 

170 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE ..................................... 21,594 21,594 

180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY ..... 788,389 761,589 

Combating terrorism fellowship program .............. [–7,000 ] 

Global Train and Equip .......................................... [–7,800 ] 

Regional centers for security centers—undistributed decrease ......................................................... [–12,000 ] 

190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE ................................. 546,603 546,603 

210 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................... 35,151 35,151 

220 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ............. 438,033 438,033 

240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY ................................................................................ 2,713,756 2,713,756 

250 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ..................................... 256,201 254,801 

THAAD excess to requirement ................................. [–1,400 ] 

270 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT ................... 371,615 217,715 

Program decrease ..................................................... [–273,300 ] 

Rephasing of Guam civilian water and waste 

water infrastructure projects ................................ [119,400 ] 

280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE .......... 2,010,176 1,995,176 

BRAC 2015 Initiative ............................................... [–8,000 ] 

OUSD(P) program decrease ..................................... [–7,000 ] 

290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES .......... 616,572 611,572 

Price Growth Requested as Program Growth ......... [–5,000 ] 

295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................ 14,283,558 14,323,558 

Classified adjustment .............................................. [10,000 ] 

Increase to Operation Observant Compass ............. [30,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND 

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ........................... 27,021,695 26,782,266 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
478 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

305 UNDISTRIBUTED .......................................................... 30,000 

Impact Aid ................................................................ [25,000 ] 

Impact Aid for Children with Severe Disabilities .. [5,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED .......................... 30,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

DEFENSE-WIDE ............................................. 32,997,693 32,760,412 

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 

040 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED 

FORCES, DEFENSE .................................................. 13,606 13,606 

050 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND 

CIVIC AID .................................................................... 109,500 109,500 

060 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ..................... 528,455 528,455 

080 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD ......................................... 256,031 131,331 

Program decrease ..................................................... [–124,700 ] 

090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY .............. 298,815 298,815 

100 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY .............. 316,103 316,103 

110 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE .... 439,820 439,820 

120 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE ...... 10,757 10,757 

130 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY 

USED SITES ............................................................... 237,443 237,443 

160 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

TRANSFER FUND ...................................................... 5,000 0 

Program reduction ................................................... [–5,000 ] 

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ............................................................... 2,215,530 2,085,830 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ..... 175,097,941 176,420,426 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................ 217,571 217,571 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ................................... 8,266 8,266 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ......................................... 56,626 56,626 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ............................................... 4,209,942 4,209,942 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................... 950,567 950,567 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ............................................................ 474,288 474,288 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............. 1,349,152 1,349,152 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ......................... 655,000 655,000 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................... 301,563 301,563 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................ 706,214 706,214 

140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES ................................................ 11,519,498 11,519,498 

150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM 60,000 60,000 

160 RESET .................................................................................. 2,240,358 3,340,358 

Restore Critical Army Reset .......................................... [1,100,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
479 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 22,749,045 23,849,045 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ............................... 4,601,356 4,601,356 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT ....................................... 17,418 17,418 

400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................. 110,000 110,000 

420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ..................................... 94,820 94,820 

430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ............................................ 54,000 54,000 

450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ....................................... 250,000 250,000 

525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................. 1,402,994 1,402,994 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ... 6,530,588 6,530,588 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY ..................................................................... 29,279,633 30,379,633 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES 

OPERATING FORCES 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ......................................... 6,995 6,995 

050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................... 2,332 2,332 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............. 608 608 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................ 33,000 33,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 42,935 42,935 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARMY RES ............................................................ 42,935 42,935 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................ 29,314 29,314 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ................................... 1,494 1,494 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ......................................... 15,343 15,343 

040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ............................................... 1,549 1,549 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ............................................................ 64,504 64,504 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............. 31,512 31,512 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ........................................ 42,179 42,179 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ................... 11,996 11,996 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 197,891 197,891 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................. 1,480 1,480 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ....... 1,480 1,480 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

ARNG ..................................................................... 199,371 199,371 

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND 

MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 

010 SUSTAINMENT ................................................................... 2,735,603 2,735,603 

020 INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................... 278,650 278,650 

030 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ......................... 2,180,382 2,180,382 

040 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ........................................ 626,550 626,550 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE .................. 5,821,185 5,821,185 

MINISTRY OF INTERIOR 

060 SUSTAINMENT ................................................................... 1,214,995 1,214,995 

080 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION ......................... 54,696 54,696 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
480 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

090 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ........................................ 626,119 626,119 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR ................. 1,895,810 1,895,810 

DETAINEE OPS 

110 SUSTAINMENT ................................................................... 7,225 7,225 

140 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ........................................ 2,500 2,500 

SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS ................................... 9,725 9,725 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

160 UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................... –1,500,000 

Program decrease .......................................................... [–1,500,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................... –1,500,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES 

FUND ..................................................................... 7,726,720 6,226,720 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 

010 POWER ................................................................................. 279,000 250,000 

Unjustified expenditure ................................................. [–29,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND ............................................................ 279,000 250,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE 

FUND ..................................................................... 279,000 250,000 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ............ 845,169 845,169 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING 

SERVICES ........................................................................ 600 600 

040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT ................. 17,489 17,489 

050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT .................................................. 78,491 78,491 

060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................... 162,420 162,420 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................ 2,700 2,700 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ...................................................... 50,130 50,130 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ................. 949,539 949,539 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ................ 20,226 20,226 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ......................................... 1,679,660 1,679,660 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ......................................... 37,760 37,760 

160 WARFARE TACTICS ........................................................... 25,351 25,351 

170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ............................................................................... 20,045 20,045 

180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ........................................... 1,212,296 1,212,296 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ......................................... 10,203 10,203 

250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT .............. 127,972 127,972 

260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .............................................. 221,427 221,427 

290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION .................................................................................. 13,386 13,386 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .......................................... 110,940 110,940 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 5,585,804 5,585,804 

MOBILIZATION 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS ....... 18,460 18,460 

360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ................................................ 227,033 227,033 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ................................... 245,493 245,493 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
481 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ..................................... 50,269 50,269 

430 TRAINING SUPPORT ......................................................... 5,400 5,400 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ........ 55,669 55,669 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................. 2,418 2,418 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS ................................................... 516 516 

510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 5,107 5,107 

520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ..................................... 1,411 1,411 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................. 2,545 2,545 

550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ............................... 153,427 153,427 

580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT .......... 8,570 8,570 

620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ................................. 1,425 1,425 

705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................. 5,608 5,608 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ....... 181,027 181,027 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY ...................................................................... 6,067,993 6,067,993 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES ................................................... 992,190 992,190 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS .............................................................. 559,574 559,574 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................... 570,000 570,000 

060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .......................................... 69,726 69,726 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 2,191,490 2,191,490 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

110 TRAINING SUPPORT ......................................................... 108,270 108,270 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ........ 108,270 108,270 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ............................... 365,555 365,555 

160 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................. 3,675 3,675 

185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................. 825 825 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ....... 370,055 370,055 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS ........................................................ 2,669,815 2,669,815 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ............ 17,196 17,196 

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE ................................... 200 200 

040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................... 6,000 6,000 

070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS ................. 12,304 12,304 

090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ......................................... 6,790 6,790 

110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ........................................... 13,210 13,210 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 55,700 55,700 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, 

NAVY RES ............................................................. 55,700 55,700 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
482 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES ........................................................ 11,124 11,124 

040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .......................................... 1,410 1,410 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 12,534 12,534 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC 

RESERVE .............................................................. 12,534 12,534 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE 

OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ........................................... 1,712,393 1,712,393 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES .............................. 836,104 836,104 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN 

SKILLS) ............................................................................. 14,118 14,118 

040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................... 1,373,480 1,373,480 

050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION .......................................................... 122,712 122,712 

060 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 1,520,333 1,520,333 

070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ............................. 31,582 31,582 

080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ........................ 147,524 147,524 

110 LAUNCH FACILITIES ........................................................ 857 857 

120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................... 8,353 8,353 

130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION 

SUPPORT .......................................................................... 50,495 50,495 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 5,817,951 5,817,951 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ...................................................... 3,091,133 3,091,133 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS .................................. 47,897 47,897 

170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................... 387,179 517,179 

Program increase ........................................................... [130,000 ] 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & 

MODERNIZATION .......................................................... 7,043 7,043 

190 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 68,382 68,382 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ................................... 3,601,634 3,731,634 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION ................................................... 100 100 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING ......................................................... 478 478 

240 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 19,256 19,256 

250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ..................................... 12,845 12,845 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING ............................................................ 731 731 

270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION .......... 607 607 

280 TRAINING SUPPORT ......................................................... 720 720 

320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION ................. 152 152 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING ........ 34,889 34,889 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ................................................ 86,273 86,273 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES .............................. 2,511 2,511 

390 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 19,887 19,887 

400 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................. 3,493 3,493 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS .............................. 152,086 152,086 

420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES .............................. 269,825 269,825 

460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ............................................ 117 117 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
483 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................. 16,558 16,558 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ....... 550,750 550,750 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR 

FORCE ................................................................... 10,005,224 10,135,224 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE 

OPERATING FORCES 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE .................................................... 26,599 26,599 

050 BASE SUPPORT .................................................................. 6,250 6,250 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 32,849 32,849 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF 

RESERVE .............................................................. 32,849 32,849 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 

OPERATING FORCES 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ................................. 22,200 22,200 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 22,200 22,200 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG 22,200 22,200 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE 

OPERATING FORCES 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ............................... 2,222,868 2,222,868 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ........................ 2,222,868 2,222,868 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ........................ 27,781 27,781 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ........ 45,746 45,746 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ........... 76,348 76,348 

140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY ......................... 99,538 99,538 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ............................................ 9,620 9,620 

180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY .......... 1,950,000 1,950,000 

240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY 100,100 100,100 

280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ............... 38,227 38,227 

290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES ............... 2,784 2,784 

295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ................................................. 1,862,066 1,862,066 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND 

SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ................................ 4,212,210 4,212,210 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................................ 6,435,078 6,435,078 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE .......... 62,829,052 62,530,052 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
484 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Military Personnel Appropriations ............................................... 130,399,881 129,716,981 

Enlistment bonuses excess to requirement ........................... [–38,000 ] 

Excess to requirement ............................................................ [–64,300 ] 

Full Time Pay and Allowances projected underexecution .. [–10,000 ] 

Full Time Support projected underexecution ...................... [–1,000 ] 

Military Personnel unobligated ............................................ [–186,000 ] 

Permanent Change of Station Travel—Army ...................... [–150,000 ] 

Recruiting and Retention programs excess to requirement [–1,800 ] 

Reenlistment bonuses excess to requirement ........................ [–68,300 ] 

Reserve Incentive Programs excess to requirement ............. [–7,750 ] 

Travel, Active Duty for Training, projected underexecution [–18,000 ] 

Undistributed reduction consistent with pace of drawdown ..................................................................................... [–137,750 ] 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions ............... 6,676,750 6,676,750 

Total, Military Personnel .................................................. 137,076,631 136,393,731 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Military Personnel Appropriations ............................................... 9,689,307 9,648,807 

Projected underexecution ....................................................... [–40,500 ] 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions ............... 164,033 164,033 

Total, Military Personnel .................................................. 9,853,340 9,812,840 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 

PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ........................... 25,158 25,158 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ................. 25,158 25,158 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 

FUEL COSTS 

SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL) ............. 61,731 61,731 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE ...... 61,731 61,731 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
485 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .................................... 46,428 46,428 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSEWIDE ................................................................................... 46,428 46,428 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ........................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ................. 1,412,510 1,412,510 

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND 

LMSR 

MPF MLP ....................................................................................... 134,917 22,717 

Navy requested adjustment ........................................... [–112,200 ] 

POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING ....................................... 43,404 43,404 

NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL 

LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE .................................... 116,784 116,784 

DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS ...................................... 60,703 60,703 

TAH MAINTENANCE .................................................................. 19,809 19,809 

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 56,058 56,058 

READY RESERVE FORCE .......................................................... 299,025 299,025 

TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND ......... 730,700 618,500 

CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ............................................... 451,572 451,572 

RDT&E ........................................................................................... 604,183 604,183 

PROCUREMENT .......................................................................... 1,368 1,368 

TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION ................................................................................... 1,057,123 1,057,123 

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF 

OPERATING FORCES ................................................................. 815,965 815,965 

DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM .............................. 122,580 122,580 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF ................................................................. 938,545 938,545 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .......................................... 311,131 346,000 

Program increase ............................................................ [34,869 ] 

RDT&E 

PROCUREMENT .......................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ..... 312,131 347,000 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

IN-HOUSE CARE ......................................................................... 8,880,738 8,880,738 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ........................................................... 15,842,732 15,775,732 

Pharmaceutical drugs excess growth ............................ [–67,000 ] 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ..................................... 2,505,640 2,505,640 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ............................................... 1,450,619 1,450,619 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ..................................................... 368,248 368,248 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................... 733,097 733,097 

BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS ............................. 1,872,660 1,872,660 

R&D RESEARCH .......................................................................... 9,162 9,162 

R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 47,977 47,977 

R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 291,156 291,156 

R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION .................................. 132,430 132,430 

R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT .................................... 161,674 161,674 

R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT ...................................... 72,568 72,568 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
486 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT .................................... 14,646 14,646 

RDT&E UNDISTRIBUTED 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING ..................................................... 89,404 89,404 

PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION ......................... 377,577 377,577 

PROC IEHR ................................................................................... 204,200 204,200 

UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................ –57,000 

DHP Unobligated ........................................................... [–275,000 ] 

Restore Tricare savings .................................................. [218,000 ] 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ....................... 33,054,528 32,930,528 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ............................. 37,638,854 37,437,523 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY 

OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY 

PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ................................... 44,732 44,732 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ......................... 44,732 44,732 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE 

C–17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR ............................................................... 78,500 78,500 

TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES ........................................... 10,000 10,000 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .............. 88,500 88,500 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE 

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) ............................................ 131,678 131,678 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ..... 131,678 131,678 

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF 

OPERATING FORCES ......................................................................... 376,305 376,305 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF .................................................................................. 376,305 376,305 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .................................................. 10,766 10,766 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ............. 10,766 10,766 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM 

IN-HOUSE CARE ................................................................................. 375,958 375,958 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ................................................................... 382,560 382,560 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ............................................. 132,749 132,749 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ....................................................... 2,238 2,238 

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES ............................................................. 460 460 

EDUCATION AND TRAINING ........................................................... 10,236 10,236 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ............................... 904,201 904,201 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ..................................... 1,556,182 1,556,182 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
487 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Alaska 

Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Battalion Complex ..................... 45,000 45,000 

Army Fort Wainwright Aviation Storage Hangar .......................... 58,000 58,000 

Colorado 

Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 66,000 66,000 

Army Fort Carson Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 73,000 73,000 

Army Fort Carson Central Energy Plant ................................ 34,000 34,000 

Army Fort Carson Fire Station ............................................... 12,000 12,000 

Army Fort Carson Headquarters Building ............................. 33,000 33,000 

Army Fort Carson Runway ...................................................... 12,000 12,000 

Army Fort Carson Simulator Building ................................... 12,200 12,200 

Florida 

Army Eglin AFB Automated Sniper Field Fire Range ........ 4,700 4,700 

Georgia 

Army Fort Gordon Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, 

Ph2.

61,000 61,000 

Hawaii 

Army Fort Shafter Command and Control Facility—Admin 75,000 70,000 

Kansas 

Army Fort Leavenworth Simulations Center ................................... 17,000 17,000 

Kentucky 

Army Fort Campbell Battlefield Weather Support Facility ....... 4,800 4,800 

Maryland 

Army Aberdeen Proving 

Ground 

Operations and Maintenance Facilities ... 21,000 21,000 

Army Fort Detrick Entry Control Point .................................. 2,500 2,500 

Army Fort Detrick Hazardous Material Storage Building .... 4,600 4,600 

Missouri 

Army Fort Leonard 

Wood 

Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, 

Ph1.

86,000 86,000 

Army Fort Leonard 

Wood 

Simulator Building ................................... 4,700 4,700 

New York 

Army U.S. Military 

Academy 

Cadet Barracks, Incr 2 ............................. 42,000 42,000 

North Carolina 

Army Fort Bragg Command and Control Facility ............... 5,900 5,900 

Texas 

Army Fort Bliss Control Tower ............................................ 10,800 10,800 

Army Fort Bliss Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Complex ......... 36,000 36,000 

Virginia 

Army Joint Base Langley-Eustis Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, 

Ph3.

50,000 50,000 

Washington 

Army Joint Base LewisMcchord Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 79,000 79,000 

Army Joint Base LewisMcchord Airfield Operations Complex .................... 37,000 37,000 

Army Joint Base LewisMcchord Aviation Battalion Complex ..................... 28,000 28,000 

Army Yakima Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun 

Range.

9,100 9,100 

Worldwide Classified 

Army Classified Location Company Operations Complex ................. 33,000 0 

Japan 

Army Kyoga Misaki Company Operations Complex ................. 0 33,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
488 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Kwajalein 

Army Kwajalein Atoll Pier ............................................................. 63,000 63,000 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Host Nation Support Fy14 ....................... 33,000 28,000 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Minor Construction Fy14 .......................... 25,000 25,000 

Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design Fy14 ....................... 41,575 41,575 

Total Military Construction, Army ............................................................... 1,119,875 1,109,875 

California 

Navy Barstow Engine Dynamometer Facility .................. 14,998 14,998 

Navy Camp Pendleton Ammunition Supply Point Upgrade ........ 13,124 13,124 

Navy Coronado H–60 Trainer Facility ............................... 8,910 8,910 

Navy Point Mugu Aircraft Engine Test Pads ........................ 7,198 7,198 

Navy Point Mugu Bams Consolidated Maintenance Hangar 17,469 17,469 

Navy Port Hueneme Unaccompanied Housing Conversion ...... 33,600 33,600 

Navy San Diego Steam Plant Decentralization .................. 34,331 34,331 

Navy Twentynine Palms Camp Wilson Infrastructure Upgrades ... 33,437 33,437 

Florida 

Navy Jacksonville P–8a Training & Parking Apron Expansion.20,752 20,752 

Navy Key West Aircraft Crash/Rescue & Fire Headquarters.14,001 14,001 

Navy Mayport Lcs Logistics Support Facility .................. 16,093 16,093 

Georgia 

Navy Albany Cers Dispatch Facility .............................. 1,010 1,010 

Navy Albany Weapons Storage and Inspection Facility 15,600 15,600 

Navy Savannah Townsend Bombing Range Land Acq— 

Phase 1.

61,717 61,717 

Guam 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Aircraft Maintenance Hangar—North 

Ramp.

85,673 85,673 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Bams Forward Operational & Maintenance Hangar.61,702 61,702 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Dehumidified Supply Storage Facility .... 17,170 17,170 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Emergent Repair Facility Expansion ....... 35,860 35,860 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Modular Storage Magazines .................... 63,382 63,382 

Navy Joint Region Marianas Sierra Wharf Improvements ..................... 1,170 1,170 

Navy Joint Region Marianas X-Ray Wharf Improvements ..................... 53,420 53,420 

Hawaii 

Navy Kaneohe Bay 3rd Radio Bn Maintenance/Operations 

Complex.

25,336 25,336 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Aircraft Maintenance Expansion ............. 16,968 16,968 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Upgrades 31,820 31,820 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Armory Addition and Renovation ............ 12,952 12,952 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Aviation Simulator Modernization/Addition.17,724 17,724 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Mv–22 Hangar ........................................... 57,517 57,517 

Navy Kaneohe Bay Mv–22 Parking Apron and Infrastructure 74,665 74,665 

Navy Pearl City Water Transmission Line ......................... 30,100 30,100 

Navy Pearl Harbor Drydock Waterfront Facility ..................... 22,721 22,721 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
489 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Navy Pearl Harbor Submarine Production Support Facility 35,277 35,277 

Illinois 

Navy Great Lakes Unaccompanied Housing .......................... 35,851 35,851 

Maine 

Navy Bangor Nctams Vlf Commercial Power Connection.13,800 13,800 

Navy Kittery Structural Shops Consolidation ............... 11,522 11,522 

Maryland 

Navy Fort Meade Marforcybercom HQ-Ops Building .......... 83,988 83,988 

Nevada 

Navy Fallon Wastewater Treatment Plant .................... 11,334 11,334 

North Carolina 

Navy Camp Lejeune Landfill—Phase 4 ..................................... 20,795 20,795 

Navy Camp Lejeune Operations Training Complex .................. 22,515 22,515 

Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization—BEQ Nodes ...... 18,679 18,679 

Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization—Camp Johnson 2,620 2,620 

Navy Camp Lejeune Steam Decentralization—Hadnot Point .. 13,390 13,390 

Navy New River Ch–53k Maintenance Training Facility ... 13,218 13,218 

Navy New River Corrosion Control Hangar ........................ 12,547 12,547 

Navy New River Regional Communication Station ............ 20,098 20,098 

Oklahoma 

Navy Tinker AFB Tacamo E–6B Hangar .............................. 14,144 14,144 

Rhode Island 

Navy Newport Hewitt Hall Research Center .................... 12,422 12,422 

South Carolina 

Navy Charleston Nuclear Power Operational Training Facility.73,932 73,932 

Virginia 

Navy Dam Neck Aerial Target Operation Consolidation ... 10,587 10,587 

Navy Norfolk Pier 11 Power Upgrades for Cvn–78 ........ 3,380 3,380 

Navy Quantico Academic Instruction Facility Tecom 

Schools.

25,731 25,731 

Navy Quantico Atc Transmitter/Receiver Relocation ....... 3,630 3,630 

Navy Quantico Fuller Road Improvements ....................... 9,013 9,013 

Navy Yorktown Small Arms Ranges .................................. 18,700 18,700 

Washington 

Navy Bremerton Integrated Water Treatment Sys Dry 

Docks 3&4.

18,189 18,189 

Navy Kitsap Explosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc) ....... 24,880 24,880 

Navy Whidbey Island Ea–18g Facility Improvements ................. 32,482 32,482 

Navy Whidbey Island P–8a Hangar and Training Facilities ..... 85,167 85,167 

Djibouti 

Navy Camp Lemonier Armory ....................................................... 6,420 6,420 

Navy Camp Lemonier Unaccompanied Housing .......................... 22,580 22,580 

Japan 

Navy Camp Butler Airfield Security Upgrades ....................... 5,820 5,820 

Navy Yokosuka Communication System Upgrade ............ 7,568 7,568 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Mcon Design Funds .................................. 89,830 89,830 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 19,740 19,740 

Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Worldwide Construction ....... 0 0 

Total Military Construction, Navy ............................................................... 1,700,269 1,700,269 

Arizona 

AF Luke AFB F–35 Field Training Detachment ............. 5,500 5,500 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
490 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AF Luke AFB F–35 Sq Ops/Aircraft Maintenance Unit 

#3.

21,400 21,400 

California 

AF Beale AFB Distributed Common Ground Station 

Ops Bldg.

62,000 62,000 

Florida 

AF Tyndall AFB F–22 Munitions Storage Complex ............ 9,100 9,100 

Guam 

AF Joint Region Marianas Par—Fuel Sys Hardened Bldgs ............... 20,000 20,000 

AF Joint Region Marianas Par—Strike Tactical Missile Mxs Facility 10,530 10,530 

AF Joint Region Marianas Par—Tanker Gp Mx Hangar/AMU/Sqd 

Ops.

132,600 132,600 

AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc Red Horse Airfield Operations Facility.8,500 8,500 

AF Joint Region Marianas Prtc Sf Fire Rescue & Emergency Mgt .... 4,600 4,600 

Hawaii 

AF Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

C–17 Modernize Hgr 35, Docks 1&2 ........ 4,800 4,800 

Kansas 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a 2–Bay Corrosion Control/Fuel 

Cell Hangar.

0 82,000 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a 3–Bay General Purpose Maintenance Hangar.0 80,000 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Aircraft Parking Apron Alteration.0 2,200 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Aprons Fuels Distribution System.0 12,800 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Flight Simulator Facility Phase 

1.

0 2,150 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a General Maintenance Hangar .... 0 32,000 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Miscellaneous Facilities Alteration.0 970 

AF Mcconnell AFB KC–46a Pipeline Student Dormatory ...... 0 7,000 

Kentucky 

AF Fort Campbell 19th Air Support Operations Sqdrn Expansion.8,000 8,000 

Maryland 

AF Fort Meade Cybercom Joint Operations Center, Increment 1.85,000 85,000 

AF Joint Base Andrews Helicopter Operations Facility ................. 30,000 30,000 

Missouri 

AF Whiteman AFB Wsa Mop Igloos and Assembly Facility ... 5,900 5,900 

Nebraska 

AF Offutt AFB Usstratcom Replacement Facility, Incr 3 136,000 136,000 

Nevada 

AF Nellis AFB Add Rpa Weapons School Facility ........... 20,000 20,000 

AF Nellis AFB Dormitory (240 Rm) .................................. 35,000 35,000 

AF Nellis AFB F–35 Alt Mission Equip (Ame) Storage ... 5,000 5,000 

AF Nellis AFB F–35 Fuel Cell Hangar ............................. 9,400 9,400 

AF Nellis AFB F–35 Parts Store ....................................... 9,100 9,100 

New Mexico 

AF Cannon AFB Airmen and Family Readiness Center ..... 5,500 5,500 

AF Cannon AFB Dormitory (144 Rm) .................................. 22,000 22,000 

AF Cannon AFB Satellite Dining Facility ........................... 6,600 6,600 

AF Holloman AFB F–16 Aircraft Covered Washrack and 

Pad.

2,250 2,250 

AF Kirtland AFB Nuclear Systems Wing & Sustainment 

Center (Ph.

30,500 30,500 

North Dakota 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
491 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

AF Minot AFB B–52 Adal Aircraft Maintenance Unit .... 15,530 15,530 

AF Minot AFB B–52 Munitions Storage Igloos ................ 8,300 8,300 

Oklahoma 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Adal Fuel Systems Maintenance Dock.0 3,350 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Adal Squad Ops/AMU ....... 0 7,400 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Flight Training Center Simulators Facility Phase 1.0 12,600 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Fuselage Trainer Phase 1 ... 0 6,300 

AF Altus AFB KC–46a Ftu Renovate Facility ................. 0 1,200 

AF Tinker AFB KC–46a Land Acquisition ........................ 8,600 8,600 

Texas 

AF Fort Bliss F–16 Bak 12/14 Aircraft Arresting System.3,350 3,350 

Utah 

AF Hill AFB F–35 Aircraft Mx Unit Hangar 45e Ops 

#1.

13,500 13,500 

AF Hill AFB Fire Crash Rescue Station ........................ 18,500 18,500 

Virginia 

AF Joint Base Langley-Eustis 4–Bay Conventional Munitions Inspection Bldg.4,800 4,800 

Greenland 

AF Thule Ab Thule Consolidation, Phase 2 .................. 43,904 43,904 

Mariana Islands 

AF Saipan Par—Airport Pol/Bulk Storage Ast ......... 18,500 18,500 

AF Saipan Par—Hazardous Cargo Pad ..................... 8,000 8,000 

AF Saipan Par—Maintenance Facility ....................... 2,800 2,800 

United Kingdom 

AF Croughton Raf Main Gate Complex .................................. 12,000 0 

AF Varlocs Guardian Angel Operations Facility ....... 22,047 22,047 

Worldwide Unspecified 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

KC–46a Ftu Facility Projects ................... 63,000 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

KC–46a Mob #1 Facility Projects ............. 192,700 0 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning & Design ................................... 11,314 11,314 

AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 20,448 20,448 

Total Military Construction, Air Force ....................................................... 1,156,573 1,138,843 

Alaska 

Def-Wide Clear AFS Bmds Upgrade Early Warning Radar .... 17,204 17,204 

Def-Wide Fort Greely Mechanical-Electrical Bldg Missile Field 

#1.

82,000 82,000 

California 

Def-Wide Brawley SOF Desert Warfare Training Center ...... 23,095 23,095 

Def-Wide Defense Distribution DepotTracy 

General Purpose Warehouse ..................... 37,554 37,554 

Def-Wide Miramar Replace Fuel Pipeline ................................ 6,000 6,000 

Colorado 

Def-Wide Fort Carson SOF Group Support Battalion ................. 22,282 22,282 

Florida 

Def-Wide Hurlburt Field SOF Add/Alter Operations Facility ........ 7,900 7,900 

Def-Wide Jacksonville Replace Fuel Pipeline ................................ 7,500 7,500 

Def-Wide Key West SOF Boat Docks ........................................ 3,600 3,600 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
492 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Def-Wide Panama City Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility 2,600 2,600 

Def-Wide Tyndall AFB Replace Fuel Pipeline ................................ 9,500 9,500 

Georgia 

Def-Wide Fort Benning Faith Middle School Addition .................. 6,031 6,031 

Def-Wide Fort Benning White Elemtary School Replacement ....... 37,304 37,304 

Def-Wide Fort Stewart Diamond Elementary School Replacement.44,504 44,504 

Def-Wide Hunter Army Airfield Replace Fuel Island .................................. 13,500 13,500 

Def-Wide Moody AFB Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility 3,800 3,800 

Hawaii 

Def-Wide Ford Island DISA Pacific Facility Upgrades ............... 2,615 2,615 

Def-Wide Joint Base Pearl 

Harbor-Hickam 

Alter Warehouse Space ............................. 2,800 2,800 

Kentucky 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell Fort Campbell High School Replacement 59,278 59,278 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell Marshall Elementary School Replacement.38,591 38,591 

Def-Wide Fort Campbell SOF Group Special Troops Battalion ...... 26,342 26,342 

Def-Wide Fort Knox Ambulatory Health Center ....................... 265,000 145,000 

Def-Wide Fort Knox Consolidate/Replace Van Voorhis-Mudge 

Es.

38,023 38,023 

Maryland 

Def-Wide Aberdeen Proving 

Ground 

Public Health Command Lab Replacement.210,000 75,000 

Def-Wide Bethesda Naval 

Hospital 

Mech & Electrical Improvements ............. 46,800 46,800 

Def-Wide Bethesda Naval 

Hospital 

Parking Garage ......................................... 20,000 20,000 

Def-Wide Fort Detrick USAMRIID Replacement Stage 1, Incr 8 13,000 13,000 

Def-Wide Fort Meade High Performance Computing Capacity 

Inc 3.

431,000 396,000 

Def-Wide Fort Meade NSAW Recapitalize Building #1/Site M 

Inc 2.

58,000 58,000 

Def-Wide Joint Base Andrews Ambulatory Care Center Inc 2 ................. 76,200 38,100 

Massachusetts 

Def-Wide Hanscom AFB Hanscom Primary School Replacement ... 36,213 36,213 

New Jersey 

Def-Wide Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Replace Fuel Distribution Components ... 10,000 10,000 

New Mexico 

Def-Wide Holloman AFB Medical Clinic Replacement ..................... 60,000 60,000 

Def-Wide Holloman AFB Replace Hydrant Fuel System .................. 21,400 21,400 

North Carolina 

Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Performance Resiliency Center ........ 14,400 14,400 

Def-Wide Camp Lejeune SOF Sustainment Training Complex ...... 28,977 28,977 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg Consolidate/Replace Pope Holbrook Elementary.37,032 37,032 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Civil Affairs Battalion Annex .......... 37,689 37,689 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Combat Medic Skills Sustain. 

Course Bldg.

7,600 7,600 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Engineer Training Facility .............. 10,419 10,419 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Language and Cultural Center ....... 64,606 64,606 

Def-Wide Fort Bragg SOF Upgrade Training Facility .............. 14,719 14,719 

North Dakota 

Def-Wide Minot AFB Replace Fuel Pipeline ................................ 6,400 6,400 

Oklahoma 

Def-Wide Altus AFB Replace Refueler Parking ......................... 2,100 2,100 

Def-Wide Tinker AFB Replace Fuel Distribution Facilities ........ 36,000 36,000 

Pennsylvania 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
493 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot New 

Cumberland 

Upgrade Hazardous Material Warehouse 3,100 3,100 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot New 

Cumberland 

Upgrade Public Safety Facility ................ 5,900 5,900 

South Carolina 

Def-Wide Beaufort Bolden Elementary/Middle School Replacement.41,324 41,324 

Tennessee 

Def-Wide Arnold Air Force 

Base 

Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility 2,200 2,200 

Texas 

Def-Wide Fort Bliss Hospital Replacement Incr 5 .................... 252,100 100,000 

Def-Wide Joint Base San 

Antonio 

Sammc Hyperbaric Facility Addition ...... 12,600 12,600 

Virginia 

Def-Wide Dam Neck SOF Human Performance Center ............ 11,147 11,147 

Def-Wide Def Distribution 

Depot Richmond 

Operations Center Phase 1 ....................... 87,000 87,000 

Def-Wide Joint Expeditionary Base 

Little Creek— 

Story 

SOF Logsu Two Operations Facility ....... 30,404 30,404 

Def-Wide Pentagon Boundary Channel Access Control Point 6,700 6,700 

Def-Wide Pentagon Army Navy Drive Tour Bus Drop Off ...... 1,850 0 

Def-Wide Pentagon Pfpa Support Operations Center .............. 14,800 14,800 

Def-Wide Pentagon Raven Rock Administrative Facility Upgrade.32,000 32,000 

Def-Wide Pentagon Raven Rock Exterior Cooling Tower ........ 4,100 4,100 

Def-Wide Quantico Quantico Middle/High School Replacement.40,586 40,586 

Washington 

Def-Wide Whidbey Island Replace Fuel Pier Breakwater .................. 10,000 10,000 

Worldwide Classified 

Def-Wide Classified Location an/Tpy–2 Radar Site ................................ 15,000 0 

Bahrain Island 

Def-Wide Sw Asia Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement ........ 45,400 45,400 

Belgium 

Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Facility ................... 38,513 38,513 

Def-Wide Brussels NATO Headquarters Fit-Out ................... 29,100 29,100 

Germany 

Def-Wide Kaiserlautern Ab Kaiserslautern Elementary School Replacement.49,907 49,907 

Def-Wide Ramstein Ab Ramstein High School Replacement ........ 98,762 98,762 

Def-Wide Rhine Ordnance 

Barracks 

Medical Center Replacement, Incr 3 ........ 151,545 76,545 

Def-Wide Weisbaden Hainerberg Elementary School Replacement.58,899 58,899 

Def-Wide Weisbaden Wiesbaden Middle School Replacement .. 50,756 50,756 

Japan 

Def-Wide Atsugi Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility 4,100 4,100 

Def-Wide Iwakuni Construct Hydrant Fuel System ............... 34,000 34,000 

Def-Wide Kadena Ab Kadena Middle School Addition/Renovation.38,792 38,792 

Def-Wide Kyoga Misaki an/Tpy–2 Radar Site ................................ 0 15,000 

Def-Wide Torri Commo Station SOF Facility Augmentation ..................... 71,451 71,451 

Def-Wide Yokosuka Upgrade Fuel Pumps ................................ 10,600 10,600 

Korea 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
494 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Def-Wide Camp Walker Daegu Middle/High School Replacement 52,164 52,164 

Romania 

Def-Wide Deveselu Aegis Ashore Missile Def Sys Cmplx, 

Increm. 2.

85,000 80,000 

United Kingdom 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall Replace Fuel Storage ................................ 17,732 17,732 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Airfield Pavements and Hangar/ 

AMU.

0 48,448 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Airfiled Pavements ........................... 24,077 0 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Hangar/AMU ................................... 24,371 0 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Mrsp and Parts Storage ................... 6,797 6,797 

Def-Wide Raf Mildenhall SOF Squadron Operations Facility ......... 11,652 11,652 

Def-Wide Royal Air Force 

Lakenheath 

Lakenheath High School Replacement .... 69,638 69,638 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Contingency Construction ......................... 10,000 0 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Energy Conservation Investment Program.150,000 150,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Exercise Related Minor Construction ...... 9,730 9,730 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning & Design ................................... 10,891 10,891 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 50,192 50,192 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 75,905 75,905 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 57,053 57,053 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 36,866 36,866 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 6,931 6,931 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 3,000 3,000 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 7,430 7,430 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 5,409 5,409 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 5,170 5,170 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 9,578 9,578 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 2,000 2,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
495 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Def-Wide Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 1,500 1,500 

Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide ................................................ 3,985,300 3,413,250 

Kentucky 

Chem Demil Blue Grass Army 

Depot 

Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, 

Ph Xiv.

122,536 122,536 

Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense ....................... 122,536 122,536 

Worldwide Unspecified 

NATO NATO Security 

Investment Program 

NATO Security Investment Program ....... 239,700 199,700 

Total NATO Security Investment Program ................................................ 239,700 199,700 

Alabama 

Army NG Decatur National Guard Readiness Center Add/ 

Alt.

4,000 4,000 

Arkansas 

Army NG Fort Chaffee Scout/Recce Gunnery Complex ................ 21,000 21,000 

Florida 

Army NG Pinellas Park Ready Building ......................................... 5,700 5,700 

Illinois 

Army NG Kankakee Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 28,000 28,000 

Army NG Kankakee Readiness Center ....................................... 14,000 14,000 

Massachusetts 

Army NG Camp Edwards Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training 

Add.

19,000 19,000 

Michigan 

Army NG Camp Grayling Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training ... 17,000 17,000 

Minnesota 

Army NG Stillwater Readiness Center ....................................... 17,000 17,000 

Mississippi 

Army NG Camp Shelby Water Supply/Treatment Building, Potable.3,000 3,000 

Army NG Pascagoula Readiness Center ....................................... 4,500 4,500 

Missouri 

Army NG Macon Vehicle Maintenance Shop ....................... 9,100 9,100 

Army NG Whiteman AFB Aircraft Maintenance Hangar .................. 5,000 5,000 

New York 

Army NG New York Readiness Center Add/Alt ........................ 31,000 31,000 

Ohio 

Army NG Ravenna Army 

Ammunition 

Plant 

Sanitary Sewer .......................................... 5,200 5,200 

Pennsylvania 

Army NG Fort Indiantown 

Gap 

Aircraft Maintenance Instructional 

Building.

40,000 40,000 

Puerto Rico 

Army NG Camp Santiago Maneuver Area Training & Equipment 

Site Addit.

5,600 5,600 

South Carolina 

Army NG Greenville Readiness Center ....................................... 13,000 13,000 

Army NG Greenville Vehicle Maintenance Shop ....................... 13,000 13,000 

Texas 

Army NG Fort Worth Armed Forces Reserve Center Add ........... 14,270 14,270 

Wyoming 

Army NG Afton National Guard Readiness Center ........... 10,200 10,200 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
496 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 29,005 24,005 

Army NG Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 12,240 12,240 

Total Military Construction, Army National Guard ............................... 320,815 315,815 

California 

Army Res Camp Parks Army Reserve Center ................................. 17,500 17,500 

Army Res Fort Hunter 

Liggett 

Tass Training Center (Ttc) ....................... 16,500 16,500 

Maryland 

Army Res Bowie Army Reserve Center ................................. 25,500 25,500 

New Jersey 

Army Res Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun 

(Mpmg).

9,500 9,500 

Army Res Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Central Issue Facility ................................ 7,900 7,900 

Army Res Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Consolidated Dining Facility ................... 13,400 13,400 

Army Res Joint Base 

Mcguire-DixLakehurst 

Modified Record Fire Range ..................... 5,400 5,400 

New York 

Army Res Bullville Army Reserve Center ................................. 14,500 14,500 

North Carolina 

Army Res Fort Bragg Army Reserve Center ................................. 24,500 24,500 

Wisconsin 

Army Res Fort Mccoy Access Control Point/Mail/Freight Center.17,500 17,500 

Army Res Fort Mccoy Nco Academy Dining Facility .................. 5,900 5,900 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Army Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 14,212 14,212 

Army Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 1,748 1,748 

Total Military Construction, Army Reserve ............................................... 174,060 174,060 

California 

N/MC Res March AFB NOSC Moreno Valley Reserve Training 

Center.

11,086 11,086 

Missouri 

N/MC Res Kansas City Reserve Training Center—Belton, Missouri.15,020 15,020 

Tennessee 

N/MC Res Memphis Reserve Boat Maintenance and Storage 

Facility.

4,330 4,330 

Worldwide Unspecified 

N/MC Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Mcnr Planning & Design ......................... 1,500 1,500 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
497 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

N/MC Res Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Usmcr Planning and Design .................... 1,040 1,040 

Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve ............. 32,976 32,976 

Alabama 

Air NG Birmingham IAP Add to and Alter Distributed Ground 

Station F.

8,500 8,500 

Indiana 

Air NG Hulman Regional 

Airport 

Add/Alter Bldg 37 for Dist Common 

Ground Sta.

7,300 7,300 

Maryland 

Air NG Fort Meade 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility.4,000 4,000 

Air NG Martin State Airport Cyber/ISR Facility ................................... 8,000 8,000 

Montana 

Air NG Great Falls IAP Intra-Theater Airlift Conversion .............. 22,000 22,000 

New York 

Air NG Fort Drum Mq–9 Flight Training Unit Hangar ........ 4,700 4,700 

Ohio 

Air NG Springfield Beckley-Map Alter Intelligence Operations Facility ...... 7,200 7,200 

Pennsylvania 

Air NG Fort Indiantown 

Gap 

Communications Operations and Training Facili.7,700 7,700 

Rhode Island 

Air NG Quonset State Airport C–130J Flight Simulator Training Facility.6,000 6,000 

Tennessee 

Air NG Mcghee-Tyson Airport Tec Expansion- Dormitory & Classroom 

Facility.

18,000 18,000 

Worldwide Unspecified 

Air NG Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design ................................ 13,400 13,400 

Air NG Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 13,000 13,000 

Total Military Construction, Air National Guard ................................... 119,800 119,800 

California 

AF Res March AFB Joint Regional Deployment Processing 

Center,.

19,900 19,900 

Florida 

AF Res Homestead AFS Entry Control Complex ............................. 9,800 9,800 

Oklahoma 

AF Res Tinker AFB Air Control Group Squadron Operations 12,200 12,200 

Worldwide Unspecified 

AF Res Various Worldwide Locations Planning and Design ................................ 2,229 2,229 

AF Res Various Worldwide Locations Unspecified Minor Construction .............. 1,530 1,530 

Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve ........................................ 45,659 45,659 

Wisconsin 

FH Con Army Fort Mccoy Family Housing New Construction (56 

Units).

23,000 23,000 

Germany 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
498 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

FH Con Army South Camp 

Vilseck 

Family Housing New Construction (29 

Units).

16,600 16,600 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Family Housing P & D ............................. 4,408 4,408 

Total Family Housing Construction, Army ................................................ 44,008 44,008 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings ............................................... 33,125 33,125 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leased Housing ......................................... 180,924 180,924 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property Facilities .. 107,639 107,639 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................ 54,433 54,433 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Military Housing Privitization Initiative 25,661 25,661 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous ............................................ 646 646 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services ...................................................... 13,536 13,536 

FH Ops Army Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities ...................................................... 96,907 96,907 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army ........................ 512,871 512,871 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Improvements ............................................ 72,093 72,093 

FH Con AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Planning and Design ................................ 4,267 4,267 

Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force ........................................ 76,360 76,360 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 39,470 39,470 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Housing Privatization ............................... 41,436 41,436 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ....................................................... 54,514 54,514 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
499 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance (Rpma Rpmc) ...................... 110,786 110,786 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................ 53,044 53,044 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous Account .............................. 1,954 1,954 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ........................................ 16,862 16,862 

FH Ops AF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ........................................ 70,532 70,532 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ................ 388,598 388,598 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Con Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Design ........................................................ 4,438 4,438 

FH Con Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Improvements ............................................ 68,969 68,969 

Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps .............. 73,407 73,407 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 21,073 21,073 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ....................................................... 74,962 74,962 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property .................. 90,122 90,122 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................ 60,782 60,782 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Miscellaneous Account .............................. 362 362 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Privatization Support Costs ..................... 27,634 27,634 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ........................................ 20,596 20,596 

FH Ops Navy Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ........................................ 94,313 94,313 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine 

Corps.

389,844 389,844 

Worldwide Unspecified 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
500 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 67 67 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 3,196 3,196 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Furnishings Account ................................. 20 20 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ....................................................... 10,994 10,994 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Leasing ....................................................... 40,433 40,433 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property .................. 311 311 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Maintenance of Real Property .................. 74 74 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Management Account ................................ 418 418 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Services Account ........................................ 32 32 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ........................................ 12 12 

FH Ops DW Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Utilities Account ........................................ 288 288 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide ......... 55,845 55,845 

Worldwide Unspecified 

FHIF Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Family Housing Improvement Fund ....... 1,780 1,780 

Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund ....................................... 1,780 1,780 

Worldwide Unspecified 

BRAC Base Realignment 

& Closure, 

Army 

Base Realignment and Closure ................ 180,401 180,401 

BRAC Base Realignment 

& Closure, 

Navy 

Base Realignment & Closure ................... 108,300 108,300 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Dod BRAC Activities—Air Force .............. 126,376 126,376 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–100: Planing, Design and Management.7,277 7,277 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–101: Various Locations ..................... 20,988 20,988 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
501 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/Country and 

Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–138: NAS Brunswick, ME ................ 993 993 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–157: Mcsa Kansas City, MO ............ 40 40 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA 5,766 5,766 

BRAC Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Don–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria 

Reg Ap.

1,216 1,216 

Total Base Realignment and Closure Account ......................................... 451,357 451,357 

Worldwide Unspecified 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—ANG Unspecified 

Minor Construction.

0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Army Bid Savings 0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Army Planning and 

Design Fy12.

0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Defense Wide Bid 

Savings.

0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Defense Wide Unspecified Minor Construction.0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Navy Bid Savings .. 0 0 

PYS Unspecified 

Worldwide Locations 

Prior Year Savings—Section 1013 of the 

Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan 

Development Act of 1966, AS Amended.

0 0 

Total Prior Year Savings ............................................................................... 0 0 

Total Military Construction ........................................................................... 11,011,633 10,366,853 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Discretionary Summary By Appropriation 

Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies 

Appropriation Summary: 

Energy Programs 

Electricity delivery and energy reliability ..................... 16,000 0 

Nuclear Energy ............................................................... 94,000 94,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
502 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

National nuclear security administration: 

Weapons activities ................................................... 7,868,409 7,909,252 

Defense nuclear nonproliferation ........................... 2,140,142 2,180,142 

Naval reactors ......................................................... 1,246,134 1,246,134 

Office of the administrator ..................................... 397,784 389,784 

Total, National nuclear security administration 11,652,469 11,725,312 

Environmental and other defense activities: 

Defense environmental cleanup .............................. 5,316,909 5,015,409 

Other defense activities ........................................... 749,080 758,658 

Total, Environmental & other defense activities 6,065,989 5,774,067 

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities ....................... 17,718,458 17,499,379 

Total, Discretionary Funding ........................................................ 17,828,458 17,593,379 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Infrastructure security & energy restoration (HS) .............. 16,000 0 

Nuclear Energy 

Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ...................................... 94,000 94,000 

Weapons Activities 

Life extension programs and major alterations 

B61 Life extension program ........................................... 537,044 537,044 

W76 Life extension program .......................................... 235,382 245,082 

W78/88–1 Life extension program ................................ 72,691 72,691 

W88 ALT 370 .................................................................. 169,487 169,487 

Total, Stockpile assessment and design ....................... 1,014,604 1,024,304 

Stockpile systems 

B61 Stockpile systems .................................................... 83,536 83,536 

W76 Stockpile systems ................................................... 47,187 47,187 

W78 Stockpile systems ................................................... 54,381 54,381 

W80 Stockpile systems ................................................... 50,330 50,330 

B83 Stockpile systems .................................................... 54,948 54,948 

W87 Stockpile systems ................................................... 101,506 101,506 

W88 Stockpile systems ................................................... 62,600 62,600 

Stockpile systems 

Total, Stockpile systems .................................................... 454,488 454,488 

Surveillance 

Weapons dismantlement and disposition 

Operations and maintenance ......................................... 49,264 55,264 

Stockpile services 

Production support ......................................................... 321,416 345,000 

Research and development support ............................... 26,349 26,349 

R&D certification and safety ......................................... 191,259 191,259 

Management, technology, and production .................... 214,187 214,187 

Plutonium sustainment .................................................. 156,949 156,949 

Total, Stockpile services ................................................... 910,160 933,744 

Total, Directed stockpile work ............................................... 2,428,516 2,467,800 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
503 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Campaigns: 

Science campaign 

Advanced certification .................................................... 54,730 54,730 

Primary assessment technologies .................................. 109,231 109,231 

Dynamic materials properties ....................................... 116,965 116,965 

Advanced radiography ................................................... 30,509 30,509 

Secondary assessment technologies ............................... 86,467 86,467 

Total, Science campaign .................................................. 397,902 397,902 

Engineering campaign 

Enhanced surety ............................................................. 51,771 51,771 

Weapon systems engineering assessment technology ... 23,727 23,727 

Nuclear survivability ..................................................... 19,504 19,504 

Enhanced surveillance ................................................... 54,909 54,909 

Total, Engineering campaign ......................................... 149,911 149,911 

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield 

campaign 

Ignition ........................................................................... 80,245 80,245 

Support of other stockpile programs ............................. 15,001 15,001 

Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support ...... 59,897 59,897 

Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion .................... 5,024 5,024 

Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas .............................................................................. 8,198 8,198 

Facility operations and target production .................... 232,678 232,678 

Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield 

campaign .......................................................................... 401,043 401,043 

Advanced simulation and computing campaign ................. 564,329 564,329 

Technology Maturation Campaign 

Readiness Campaign 

Component manufacturing development ...................... 106,085 106,085 

Tritium readiness ........................................................... 91,695 91,695 

Total, Readiness campaign ............................................. 197,780 197,780 

Total, Campaigns ...................................................................... 1,710,965 1,710,965 

Nuclear programs 

Nuclear operations capability ............................................... 265,937 265,937 

Capabilities based investments ............................................ 39,558 39,558 

Construction: 

12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL ......................... 26,722 26,722 

11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, 

LANL ........................................................................... 30,679 30,679 

07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility 

upgrade project, LANL ............................................... 55,719 55,719 

06–D–141 PED/Construction, Uranium Capabilities 

Replacement Project Y–12 .......................................... 325,835 325,835 

Total, Construction ............................................................ 438,955 438,955 

Total, Nuclear programs ......................................................... 744,450 744,450 

Secure transportation asset 

Operations and equipment .................................................... 122,072 122,072 

Program direction .................................................................. 97,118 97,118 

Total, Secure transportation asset ....................................... 219,190 219,190 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
504 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Site stewardship 

Nuclear materials integration .............................................. 17,679 17,679 

Corporate project management ............................................. 13,017 13,017 

Minority serving institution partnerships program ............ 14,531 14,531 

Enterprise infrastructure 

Site Operations ............................................................... 1,112,455 1,112,455 

Site Support .................................................................... 109,561 109,561 

Sustainment .................................................................... 433,764 433,764 

Facilities disposition ...................................................... 5,000 5,000 

Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure .............................. 1,660,780 1,660,780 

Total, Site stewardship ............................................................ 1,706,007 1,706,007 

Defense nuclear security 

Operations and maintenance ................................................ 664,981 664,981 

Construction: 

14–D–710 DAF Argus, NNSS ........................................ 14,000 

Total, Defense nuclear security ............................................. 678,981 678,981 

NNSA CIO activities .................................................................... 148,441 150,000 

Legacy contractor pensions .......................................................... 279,597 279,597 

Subtotal, Weapons activities .......................................................... 7,916,147 7,956,990 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances .................................................... –47,738 –47,738 

Total, Adjustments .................................................................... –47,738 –47,738 

Total, Weapons Activities ............................................................... 7,868,409 7,909,252 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs 

Global threat reduction initiative ......................................... 424,487 424,487 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D 

Operations and maintenance ......................................... 388,838 388,838 

Nonproliferation and international security ....................... 141,675 141,675 

International material protection and cooperation ............. 369,625 369,625 

Fissile materials disposition 

U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition 

Operations and maintenance 

U.S. plutonium disposition ............................. 157,557 157,557 

U.S. uranium disposition ................................ 25,000 25,000 

Total, Operations and maintenance ............... 182,557 182,557 

Construction: 

99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC .............................. 320,000 360,000 

Total, Construction ............................................. 320,000 360,000 

Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition 502,557 542,557 

Total, Fissile materials disposition ............................... 502,557 542,557 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
505 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Legacy contractor pensions ................................................... 93,703 93,703 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs ........ 1,920,885 1,962,444 

Nuclear counterterrorism incident response program ................ 181,293 181,293 

Counterterrorism and counterproliferation programs ................ 74,666 74,666 

Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ...................... 2,176,844 2,216,844 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances .................................................... –36,702 –36,702 

Total, Adjustments .................................................................... –36,702 –36,702 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ................................... 2,140,142 2,180,142 

Naval Reactors 

Naval reactors operations and infrastructure ............................ 455,740 453,740 

Naval reactors development ......................................................... 419,400 419,400 

Ohio replacement reactor systems development .......................... 126,400 126,400 

S8G Prototype refueling ............................................................... 144,400 144,400 

Program direction ......................................................................... 44,404 44,404 

Construction: 

14–D–902 KL Materials characterization laboratory expansion, KAPL ................................................................... 1,000 1,000 

14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, 

NRF .................................................................................... 45,400 45,400 

13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL .... 21,073 21,073 

13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, 

KSO .................................................................................... 600 2,600 

Naval Reactor Facility, ID .................................................... 1,700 1,700 

Total, Construction ................................................................... 69,773 71,773 

Subtotal, Naval Reactors ................................................................ 1,260,117 1,260,117 

Adjustments: 

Use of prior year balances (Naval reactors) ........................ –13,983 –13,983 

Total, Naval Reactors ...................................................................... 1,246,134 1,246,134 

Office Of The Administrator 

Office of the administrator ........................................................... 397,784 389,784 

Total, Office Of The Administrator .............................................. 397,784 389,784 

Defense Environmental Cleanup 

Closure sites: 

Closure sites administration ................................................. 4,702 4,702 

Hanford site: 

River corridor and other cleanup operations ....................... 393,634 408,634 

Central plateau remediation ................................................. 513,450 513,450 

Richland community and regulatory support ..................... 14,701 14,701 

Total, Hanford site .................................................................... 921,785 936,785 

Idaho National Laboratory: 

Idaho cleanup and waste disposition ................................... 362,100 372,600 

Idaho community and regulatory support ........................... 2,910 2,910 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
506 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Total, Idaho National Laboratory ........................................ 365,010 375,510 

NNSA sites 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ........................... 1,476 1,476 

Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research Unit 23,700 23,700 

Nevada ................................................................................... 61,897 61,897 

Sandia National Laboratories .............................................. 2,814 2,814 

Los Alamos National Laboratory ......................................... 219,789 234,789 

Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ............................... 309,676 324,676 

Oak Ridge Reservation: 

OR Nuclear facility D & D ................................................... 73,716 73,716 

OR cleanup and disposition ................................................. 115,855 115,855 

OR reservation community and regulatory support ............ 4,365 4,365 

Total, Oak Ridge Reservation ................................................ 193,936 193,936 

Office of River Protection: 

Waste treatment and immobilization plant 

01–D–416 A–E/ORP–0060 / Major construction ........ 690,000 690,000 

Tank farm activities 

Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ... 520,216 520,216 

Total, Office of River protection ............................................ 1,210,216 1,210,216 

Savannah River sites: 

Savannah River risk management operations .................... 432,491 432,491 

SR community and regulatory support ................................ 11,210 11,210 

Radioactive liquid tank waste: 

Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ........................................................................ 552,560 657,560 

Construction: 

05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River ............................................................. 92,000 92,000 

Total, Construction .................................................... 92,000 92,000 

Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste ............................ 644,560 749,560 

Total, Savannah River site ..................................................... 1,088,261 1,193,261 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 

Waste isolation pilot plant .................................................... 203,390 219,390 

Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant ......................................... 203,390 219,390 

Program direction ......................................................................... 280,784 280,784 

Program support ........................................................................... 17,979 17,979 

Safeguards and Security: 

Oak Ridge Reservation .......................................................... 18,800 18,800 

Paducah ................................................................................. 9,435 9,435 

Portsmouth ............................................................................. 8,578 8,578 

Richland/Hanford Site ......................................................... 69,078 69,078 

Savannah River Site ............................................................. 121,196 121,196 

Waste Isolation Pilot Project ................................................. 4,977 4,977 

West Valley ............................................................................. 2,015 2,015 

Technology development ............................................................... 24,091 24,091 

Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup .................................. 4,853,909 5,015,409 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
507 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution ............................ 463,000 0 

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup ...................................... 5,316,909 5,015,409 

Other Defense Activities 

Health, safety and security 

Health, safety and security ................................................... 143,616 143,616 

Program direction .................................................................. 108,301 108,301 

Total, Health, safety and security ......................................... 251,917 251,917 

Specialized security activities ...................................................... 196,322 205,900 

Office of Legacy Management 

Legacy management .............................................................. 163,271 163,271 

Program direction .................................................................. 13,712 13,712 

Total, Office of Legacy Management .................................... 176,983 176,983 

Defense-related activities 

Defense related administrative support 

Chief financial officer ............................................................ 38,979 38,979 

Chief information officer ....................................................... 79,857 79,857 

Total, Defense related administrative support .................. 118,836 118,836 

Office of hearings and appeals .................................................... 5,022 5,022 

Subtotal, Other defense activities ................................................ 749,080 758,658 

Total, Other Defense Activities ...................................................... 749,080 758,658 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
(509) 

JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY THE 

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL 

YEAR 2014 

[Note from the Director, Legislative Operations: The following is 

the text of the Joint Explanatory Statement to Accompany the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as printed in 

the Congressional Record on December 12, 2013] 

Compliance with rules of the House of Representatives and Senate 

regarding earmarks and congressionally directed spending 

items 

Consistent with the intent of clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules 

of the House of Representatives and rule XLIV of the Standing 

Rules of the Senate, neither the bill nor the accompanying joint explanatory statement contains any congressional earmarks, congressionally directed spending items, limited tax benefits, or limited 

tariff benefits, as defined in such rules. 

Summary of discretionary authorizations and budget implication 

The administration’s budget request for national defense discretionary programs within the jurisdiction of the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives for 

fiscal year 2014 was $625.2 billion. Of this amount, $526.6 billion 

was requested for base Department of Defense (DOD) programs, 

$80.7 billion was requested for overseas contingency operations 

(OCO), and $17.9 billion was requested for national security programs in the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB). 

The bill authorizes $625.1 billion in fiscal year 2014, including 

$526.8 billion for base DOD programs, $80.7 billion for OCO, and 

$17.6 billion for national security programs in the DOE and the 

DNFSB. 

The two tables preceding the detailed program adjustments in 

Division D of this Joint Explanatory Statement summarize the direct discretionary authorizations in the agreement and the equivalent budget authority levels for fiscal year 2014 defense programs. 

The first table summarizes the agreement on authorizations within 

the jurisdiction of the Armed Services Committees. The second 

table details the budget authority implication of the discretionary 

authorizations in the agreement when accounting for national defense items that are not in the jurisdiction of the Armed Services 

Committees. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
510 

DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE I—PROCUREMENT

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 101) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for procurement for the Army, the 

Navy and Marine Corps, the Air Force, and defense-wide activities, 

as specified in the funding table in section 4101. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 101). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—Army Programs 

Limitation on availability of funds for Stryker vehicle program (sec. 

111) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 111) that would limit 

the availability of funds for the Stryker vehicle program to not 

more than 75 percent until the Secretary of the Army submits a 

report on Stryker spare parts inventories. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Study on multiyear, multivehicle procurement authority for tactical 

vehicles (sec. 112) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 142) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to enter into a 5-year pilot program for the multiyear multivehicle procurement of tactical 

wheeled vehicles. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would express a sense of Congress and require a study and report 

on multiyear multivehicle procurement. 

Subtitle C—Navy Programs 

CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program (sec. 121) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 122) that would amend 

section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) by: (1) Adjusting the cap 

for CVN–78 from $10,500.0 million to $12,887.0 million; (2) Adjusting the cost cap for subsequent ships in the class from $8,100.0 

million to $11,411.0 million; and (3) Adding a new factor for adjustment, allowing increases or decreases in the cost of CVN–78 that 

are attributable to the shipboard test program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 122) that would amend section 122 by: (1) Adjusting the cost 

cap for CVN–78 from $10,500.0 million to $12,887.0 million; (2) 

Adding a new factor for adjustment, allowing increases or decreases in the cost of the CVN–78 class that are attributable to the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
511 

shipboard test program; (3) Requiring quarterly updates on the cost 

of CVN–79; and (4) Preventing the Navy from paying fees under 

any cost-type or incentive fee contract if the program manager’s estimate of the total cost of CVN–79 exceeds the cost cap for CVN– 

79. 

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) by: (1) Adjusting the cap for 

CVN–78 from $10,500.0 million to $12,887.0 million; (2) Adjusting 

the cost cap for subsequent ships in the class from $8,100.0 million 

to $11,498.0 million; (3) Adding a new factor for adjustment, allowing increases or decreases in the cost of CVN–78 that are attributable to the shipboard test program, but only when the changes 

result for urgent and unforeseen testing problems that would delay 

delivery or initial operating capability of the ship; (4) Requiring 

quarterly updates on the cost of CVN–79; and (5) Directing the Secretary of the Navy to ensure that each prime contract for CVN–79 

includes an incentive fee structure that will, throughout the entire 

period of performance of the contract, provide incentives for each 

contractor to meet the portion of the cost of the ship for which the 

contractor is responsible. 

Repeal of requirements relating to procurement of future surface 

combatants (sec. 122) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

123) that would repeal a reporting requirement in section 125 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84). The report submitted by the Secretary of the Navy 

to Congress of February 2010 provided the Department of the 

Navy’s implementation plan to complete these reports. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Multiyear procurement authority for E–2D aircraft program (sec. 

123) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 121) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to buy E–2D aircraft and E–2D 

mission equipment under one or more multiyear procurement contracts. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

121) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to buy E–2D 

aircraft under one or more multiyear procurement contracts. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship (sec. 

124) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

125) that would require that the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), 

in coordination with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on 

the current concept of operations and expected survivability attributes of each of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) sea frames when 

they would be employed according to the concept of operations. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
512 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would fence funding for LCS–25 and LCS–26 until: (1) 

The Navy provides certain reports about the LCS program; and (2) 

The Joint Requirements Oversight Council makes certain certifications about the LCS program. 

Subtitle D—Air Force Programs 

Repeal of requirement for maintenance of certain retired KC–135E 

aircraft (sec. 131) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

133) that would repeal section 135(b) of the John Warner National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109– 

364). Section 135(b) requires that the Secretary of the Air Force 

maintain at least 74 of the KC–135E aircraft retired after September 30, 2006 in a condition that would allow recall of the aircraft to future service in the Air Force Reserve, Air National 

Guard, or active forces aerial refueling force structure. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The House bill, however, contained a provision (sec. 133) that 

would require that the Secretary of the Air Force maintain any retired KC–135R aircraft in a condition that would allow recall of the 

aircraft to future service in the Air Force Reserve, Air National 

Guard, or active forces aerial refueling force structure. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical/ 

clarifying amendment. 

Multiyear procurement authority for C–130J aircraft (sec. 132) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 131) that would authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to enter into one or more 

multiyear contracts to procure multiple variants of the C–130J aircraft. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 151) that would allow the Secretary of the Air Force to enter 

into one or more multiyear contracts to procure C–130J aircraft. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Prohibition on cancellation or modification of avionics modernization program for C–130 aircraft (sec. 133) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 132) that would prohibit the Secretary of the Air Force from terminating the legacy C– 

130H Avionics Modernization Program (AMP). The House report 

accompanying H.R. 1960 (H. Rept. 113–102) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 recommended an increase of $47.3 million in Aircraft Procurement, Air Force (APAF), 

to fund modifications of legacy C–130 with the original AMP upgrade. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. The Senate report accompanying S. 1197 (S. Rept. 113–44) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 recommended an increase of $47.3 million in APAF to fund modifications of legacy C–130 with either: (1) the original AMP upgrade; or 

(2) an alternative program that would upgrade and modernize the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
513 

legacy C–130 airlift fleet using a reduced scope program for avionics and mission planning systems. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would add a requirement that the Comptroller General conduct a sufficiency review of the cost-benefit analysis conducted 

under section 143(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), including any findings and 

recommendations relating to such review. The agreement also recommends an increase of $47.3 million for Research, Development, 

Test, and Evaluation, Air Force, in PE 41115F for C–130 Airlift 

Squadrons, pending completion of that sufficiency review. This is 

in lieu of a recommendation for additional procurement funding in 

fiscal year 2014, since procurement funding for modernizing C–130 

avionics would be premature. 

Prohibition of procurement of unnecessary C–27J aircraft by the Air 

Force (sec. 134) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

134) that would prevent the Secretary of the Air Force from obligating or expending any funds for the procurement of C–27J aircraft not on contract as of June 1, 2013. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the provision with an amendment that 

would narrow the prohibition to the use of funds authorized in fiscal year 2012, since all C–27J funds except the fiscal year 2012 

funds have been obligated or transferred to other programs. 

Subtitle E—Defense-Wide, Joint, and Multiservice Matters 

Personal protection equipment procurement (sec. 141) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 144) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that within each military 

service procurement account, a separate procurement budget line 

item is designated for personal protection equipment (PPE) investment and funding transparency. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would direct the Secretary of Defense to submit with the annual 

budget request a consolidated budget display that describes and 

justifies all programs and activities, in the appropriations accounts 

for operation and maintenance as well as research, development, 

test, and evaluation, associated with the development and procurement of PPE. 

After 12 years of war and billions of dollars spent to develop, 

produce, and field the best available individual PPE, such as body 

armor and helmets, the Department of Defense should not lose momentum in its search for better protection at lower weight and cost 

for individual soldiers, marines, airmen, and sailors. One of the 

most important lessons of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is that 

research, development, and acquisition (RDA) of improved ballistic 

protection for our troops must anticipate, not react, to likely 

threats. In this regard, budget visibility must be sufficient to allow 

for comprehensive oversight of the Department’s RDA efforts as reVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00545 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
514 

flected in the annual budget request accompanied by spending estimates projected over the subsequent 5 years. Subject to the completeness and usefulness of the information provided in the budget 

exhibits that would be required by this provision, Congress may 

consider other budgetary methods for ensuring the Department’s 

investments over time sustain the importance of and momentum 

for achieving technological improvements in PPE into the future. 

We also note that the Department categorizes PPE, including 

body armor, as an ‘‘expendable’’ item consistent with current acquisition and financial management policy definitions. Nonetheless, 

given the military’s experiences during operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, the significant RDA investment for body armor, and the 

fact that body armor is now an essential part of individual combat 

equipment, one could question whether the categorization of PPE, 

and body armor in particular, should change from ‘‘expendable’’ to 

another category that could improve resource stability and provide 

for better management throughout the RDA process. Accordingly, 

the Secretary of Defense is encouraged to reassess the Department’s categorization of PPE and body armor as ‘‘expendable’’ 

items. 

Repeal of certain F–35 reporting requirements (sec. 142) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 145) that would amend 

section 122 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) to eliminate the requirement to provide an annual update to the F–35 system maturity 

matrix. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RQ–4 Global 

Hawk unmanned aircraft systems and A–10 aircraft (sec. 143) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 143) that would limit 

the use of funds to retire Global Hawk Block 30 unmanned aircraft 

systems and would require the Secretary of the Air Force to take 

all actions necessary to maintain the operational capability of the 

RQ–4 Block 30 Global Hawk through December 31, 2016. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would: (1) Prohibit spending funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available during fiscal year 2014 to retire Global Hawk Block 30 unmanned aircraft systems or A–10 aircraft (except for A–10s planned for retirement on or before April 9, 

2013); (2) Modify the prohibited spending to include making significant changes to Global Hawk and A–10 manning levels during fiscal year 2014; (3) Prohibit the Secretary of the Air Force from retiring or planning to retire A–10 aircraft (except for A–10s planned 

for retirement on or before April 9, 2013) between October 1, 2014 

and December 31, 2014; and (4) Add a requirement that the Secretary of Defense provide a report on all high-altitude intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance systems that the Department of 

Defense is operating or plans to operate in the future. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
515 

We intend that the prohibition on making additional A–10 aircraft retirements before December 31, 2014, be to provide breathing space for Congress to conduct oversight and to consider what 

actions to take on any force structure changes the Air Force may 

propose in fiscal year 2015. 

MC–12 Liberty Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance aircraft (sec. 144) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

934) that would require the Secretary of Defense to develop and 

carry out a plan for the transfer of Air Force MC–12 aircraft to the 

Army. The provision would also prohibit the Army from acquiring 

the Enhanced Medium Altitude Reconnaissance and Surveillance 

System (EMARSS) in fiscal year 2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that directs the Secretary of Defense to develop a plan for the 

potential transfer of MC–12 Liberty aircraft from the Air Force to 

the Army. In addition, the provision prohibits the Army from using 

fiscal year 2014 funds to procure additional aircraft under the 

EMARSS program, but does allow the Army to use fiscal year 2014 

funds to complete conversion efforts of existing aircraft that have 

already been procured, and to convert transferred Liberty aircraft 

to the EMARSS configuration. 

Competition for evolved expendable launch vehicle providers (sec. 

145) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 134) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop and implement a 

plan to ensure the fair evaluation of competing contractors in 

awarding a contract to a certified evolved expendable launch vehicle provider. This plan would include descriptions of how the following areas would be addressed in the evaluation: the proposed 

cost, schedule, and performance; mission assurance activities; the 

manner in which the contractor will operate under the Federal Acquisition Regulation; the effect of other contracts in which the contractor is entered into with the Federal Government, such as the 

Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) launch capability and 

the space station commercial resupply services contracts; and any 

other areas determined appropriate by the Secretary. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that requires the plan at the same time that the Secretary issues 

a draft request for proposals for a contract on the EELV with respect to how the Secretary will conduct competition in awarding 

the contract in addition to the specific areas listed in the original 

House bill. 

We note that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) is conducting ongoing work regarding the EELV competition. We request 

that GAO conduct a review of the Air Force EELV acquisition 

strategy, which should include an assessment of the methodology, 

potential challenges, gaps, and acquisition planning process of the 

Air Force for evaluating competitors, and that GAO brief the deVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00547 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
516 

fense and intelligence committees on its review. We request that 

this briefing be provided before a draft request for proposal is released by the Air Force. 

This legislative provision should not be construed as direction regarding ongoing procurement or any aspect of source selection criteria. 

Reports on personal protection equipment and health and safety 

risks associated with ejection seats (sec. 146) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 146) that would require the Secretary of Defense to enter into a contract with a federally-funded research and development center (FFRDC) to conduct 

a study to identify and assess alternative and effective means for 

stimulating competition and innovation in the personal protection 

equipment industrial base. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would also require the Secretary of the Air Force to conduct a 

study to assess the safety of ejection seats currently in operational 

use by the Air Force. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Modification of requirements to sustain Navy airborne intelligence, 

surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

124) that would amend section 112 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) 

to require the Secretary of the Navy to maintain sufficient numbers 

of EP–3 Airborne Reconnaissance Integrated Electronic System II 

(ARIES II) Spiral 3 aircraft and Special Projects Aircraft (SPA) 

version P909 to support the wartime operational plans of U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM), and to maintain the capacity to support 

five EP–3s for allocation to the combatant commands under the 

Global Force Management Allocation Plan (GFMAP), until the 

Navy’s multi-intelligence (Multi-INT) Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) System TRITON aircraft with signals intelligence 

(SIGINT) capabilities reaches initial operational capability (IOC). 

The provision also would require the Secretary to upgrade the final 

(12th) EP–3 ARIES II aircraft to the Spiral 3 configuration, and to 

correct electronic intelligence (ELINT) obsolescence problems on 

both the EP–3 and the SPA aircraft. Finally, the provision would 

require the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council 

(JROC) to coordinate with the Commanders of PACOM and the 

U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) to determine requirements for the special capabilities provided by the SPA aircraft, and 

would require the Secretary to sustain sufficient numbers of SPA 

aircraft to meet those requirements until the Navy achieves IOC of 

a system with capabilities greater than or equal to the SPA. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Section 112 of Public Law 111–383 is intended to prevent a capacity decline in capabilities as the Navy developed replacements 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
517 

for the EP–3 and the SPA intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems. The Navy budget request, which is counter to 

congressional intent, creates a plan for transitioning from the EP– 

3/SPA systems to the TRITON Multi-INT and P–8 Quick Reaction 

Capability (QRC) that would result in a capacity decline beginning 

in fiscal year 2015. 

The Navy also informed Congress that the JROC supports the 

Navy’s transition plan, but in fact the JROC Memorandum 

(JROCM) on this issue expresses concern about the Navy’s plan 

and requires numerous follow-up actions. In addition, the JROCM 

instructs the Navy to develop requirements for the Multi-INT TRITON prior to the program’s next acquisition milestone review. Congressional review of the TRITON Capabilities Development Document confirms that a robust SIGNIT capability is documented only 

as a ‘‘potential future capability,’’ and not a validated requirement 

as implied by Navy officials to Congress. 

The Navy also proposes to prematurely remove highly-skilled 

personnel from the EP–3/SPA programs, resulting in a reduction of 

the number of available aircraft to support GFMAP and wartime 

requirements. Congress is concerned that harvesting these personnel to support an early version of TRITON that provides only 

optical and radar sensing, but little or no SIGINT capability, does 

not maximize utilization of highly-skilled personnel with perishable 

skill sets. Furthermore, the lack of a validated requirement for a 

robust SIGINT capability for TRITON raises concerns that the capacity and capability decline will turn out to be a permanent ISR 

capability loss. 

We have serious concerns about the Navy’s non-compliant EP–3/ 

SPA to P–8 QRC/TRITON Multi-INT transition plan. Therefore, we 

direct that: 

(1) The JROC review and report to Congress the combatant 

commander requirements for the simultaneous ISR collection 

capability provided by EP–3/SPA assets under current Operational Plans and for the GFMAP; 

(2) The Joint Staff and the Under Secretary of Defense for 

Intelligence (USDI) identify and report to Congress alternative 

EP–3/SPA to P–8 QRC/TRITON Multi-INT transition options 

that do not result in a capacity decline or capability gap, including such options as using Navy reserve personnel to stand 

up the baseline TRITON system; 

(3) The JROC collaborate with the Navy to develop and document a formal requirement for TRITON Multi-INT; 

(4) The USDI develop, and report to Congress, a mitigation 

plan to address the ELINT obsolescence issues identified in the 

Senate report accompanying S. 1197 (S. Rept. 113–44) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014; and, 

(5) The JROC and USDI to determine, and report to Congress, the force structure quantity and type of federated ISR 

systems and sensors required to wholly replace the EP–3/SPA 

force structure of aircraft to meet or exceed the current capacity and diversity of ISR collection capability inherently resident 

on the EP–3/SPA aircraft. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
518 

Multiyear procurement authority for Ground-Based Interceptors 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 141) that would provide multi-year procurement authority and advance procurement 

authority to the Director of the Missile Defense Agency for the procurement of 14 Ground-Based Interceptors. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Senate on the United States helicopter industrial base 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

152) that would express the sense of Senate on the health of the 

helicopter industrial base. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

TITLE II—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 201) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 201) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Department of 

Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified 

in the funding table in section 4201. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 201). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—Program Requirements, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Modification of requirements on biennial strategic plan for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (sec. 211) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

212) that would modify the biennial strategic plan requirement for 

the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to make 

more explicit the linkages between the strategic objections of the 

agency with the missions of the armed forces. Additionally, the provision would reassign responsibility for submission of the plan from 

the Secretary of Defense to the Director of DARPA, in coordination 

with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

We recognize the value that DARPA brings to the Department of 

Defense, especially in terms of high risk research that can be potentially game changing. We believe that such research has the 

highest probability of successful transition when it is linked early 

with the operational defense community. 

For example, DARPA’s Phoenix program has the potential to 

change radically how the United States approaches space systems 

development and servicing. As the only program looking at satellite 

servicing and advanced robotics for geosynchronous earth orbit systems, this program has significant national security, civil, and as 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
519 

well as, commercial potential. However, we note that the development of such capabilities may raise complex policy issues, as well 

as pose as a disruptive technology to established approaches and 

operations. We encourage DARPA to not only continue its technical 

leadership in this field, but to also work with other entities in the 

Department of Defense—such as the Air Force, the National Reconnaissance Office, and the Under Secretaries of Defense for Policy 

and Intelligence—to ensure the development of operational concepts for this capability. 

Limitation on availability of funds for ground combat vehicle engineering and manufacturing phase (sec. 212) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 211) that would prohibit the Army from obligating post-Milestone B funds for the 

Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) program until the Secretary of the 

Army submits a report to the congressional defense committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with technical and clarifying amendments. 

Additionally, the Comptroller General of the United States is directed to submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

setting forth an assessment by the Comptroller General of the 

study of the Army on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle industrial base 

submitted to Congress pursuant to the Conference Report to accompany H.R. 4310 (112th Congress), the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (House Report 112–705). The report 

required shall include an assessment of the reasonableness of the 

study’s methods including, but not limited to, the sufficiency, validity, and reliability of the data used to conduct the study, and include findings and recommendations, if any, on the combat vehicle 

industrial base. In conducting this review the Comptroller General 

should not replicate the Army study. 

Limitation and reporting requirements for unmanned carrierlaunched surveillance and strike system program (sec. 213) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 212) that would prohibit the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics from approving a Milestone. A technology development contract award for the Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne 

Surveillance and Strike (UCLASS) program until 30 days after the 

Under Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees 

that the software and system engineering designs for the control 

system and connectivity segment and the aircraft carrier segment 

of the UCLASS system can achieve, at a low level of integration 

risk, successful compatibility and operability with the air vehicle 

segment planned for selection at Milestone A contract award. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would modify the language to require that: (1) The Navy to 

limit the number of air vehicle segments acquired prior to receiving 

Milestone B approval for UCLASS; (2) The Navy provide periodic 

reports on cost, schedule and requirements changes for UCLASS; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
520 

and (3) The Comptroller General conduct annual reviews of the 

UCLASS program. 

Limitation on availability of funds for Air Force logistics transformation (sec. 214) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 213) that would restrict the obligation and expenditure of Air Force procurement and 

research, development, test, and evaluation funds for logistics information technology programs until 30 days after the date on 

which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional 

defense committees a report on the modernization and update of 

Air Force logistics information technology systems following the 

cancellation of the expeditionary combat support system. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Limitation on availability of funds for defensive cyberspace operations of the Air Force (sec. 215) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 214) that would limit 

the funds the Air Force may obligate or expend for Defensive 

Cyberspace Operations in PE 0202088F to not more than 90 percent until a period of 30 days after the date on which the Secretary 

of the Air Force submits a report to the congressional defense committees detailing the Air Force’s plan for sustainment of the Application Software Assurance Center of Excellence (ASACOE) across 

the Future Years Defense Program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision but included elsewhere in the committee-reported bill is $10.0 

million in PE 33140F for sustainment of the ASACOE. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Limitation on availability of funds for precision extended range munition program (sec. 216) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 215) that would limit 

funds for the precision extended range munition program until the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics provides the congressional defense committees with certain 

written certifications and a sufficient business case analysis. 

The Senate committee-report bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Long-range standoff weapon requirement; prohibition on availability of funds for noncompetitive procedures for offensive antisurface warfare weapon contracts of the Navy (sec. 217) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 218) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop a follow-on airlaunched cruise missile, Long Range Stand Off (LRSO) weapon to 

the AGM–86 that achieves initial operating capability for both conventional and nuclear missions by not later than 2030 and is certified for internal carriage and employment for both conventional 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
521 

and nuclear missions on the next-generation long-range strike 

bomber by not later than 2034. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that requires the LRSO to achieve initial operating capability for 

conventional missions prior to the retirement of the AGM–86, for 

nuclear missions prior to the retirement of the nuclear armed 

AGM–86 and is capable of internal carriage and employment for 

both missions in the long-range strike bomber. The amendment 

provides that the Secretary may carry out the consecutive development of the nuclear and conventional capabilities, with the nuclear 

capability first, if it is determined to be cost effective. 

The amendment further includes a provision that would prohibit, 

during fiscal year 2014, using available funds to contract for Navy 

offensive anti-surface warfare weapons using other than through 

competitive procedures. Development, testing, and fielding of aircraft-launched offensive anti-surface warfare weapons would be exempted from that prohibition. Included in the provision is a waiver 

of the prohibition by the Secretary of Defense if the Secretary determines that waiving this prohibition is in the national security 

interests of the United States. 

Review of software development for F–35 aircraft (sec. 218) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 219) that would require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) to establish an independent team consisting of subject matter experts to review the development of software for the F–35 aircraft program and to report on the results of 

that review. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the USD(AT&L) to provide a plan for the 

sustainment of the Autonomic Logistics Information System for the 

F–35 aircraft. 

Evaluation and assessment of the distributed common ground system (sec. 219) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 220) that would require that: (1) Beginning with the budget request for fiscal year 

2015, future budget submissions include separate project codes for 

each capability component within each program element for each 

service version of the Distributed Common Ground System (DCGS); 

(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics (USD(AT&L)) conduct an analysis of commercial link 

analysis tools that could be used to meet the requirements of each 

of the service versions of the DCGS; and (3) If one or more commercial link analysis tools were found to meet the requirements of the 

program, the responsible service secretary would be required to initiate a request for proposals to purchase those tools. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
522 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would include the requirement that: (1) The services’ budget 

submissions include separate project codes for each capability component within each program element for each service version of the 

DCGS; and (2) The USD(AT&L) conduct an analysis of capability 

components of DCGS that are compliant with the intelligence community data standards and could be used to meet the requirements 

of the DCGS program. The provision would require the 

USD(AT&L) to submit a report of that analysis within 180 days of 

enactment of this Act. We expect that the USD(AT&L) will adjust 

the acquisition plans for DCGS if his analysis of the competitive acquisition options for capability components within DCGS shows 

that expanded competition shows promise. 

Operationally responsive space (sec. 220) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 225) that would prohibit expending more than 50 percent of the funds authorized or 

expended for the space-based infrared system modernization initiative wide field of view test bed until the Executive Agent for Space 

certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary 

of Defense is carrying out the Operationally Responsive Space program office in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2273a. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes an amendment requiring a report no 

later than 60 days from the date of enactment regarding a potential mission that would seek to leverage all the policy objectives of 

the Operationally Responsive Space Program in a single mission. 

Sustainment or replacement of Blue Devil intelligence, surveillance, 

and reconnaissance capabilities (sec. 221) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

216) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to procure 

the currently deployed Blue Devil intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) system or to develop a plan to replace that system with a comparable or improved system. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop 

a plan to sustain the operational capabilities of the Blue Devil I 

ISR Systems, including precision signal geolocation, by procuring 

the existing Blue Devil I aircraft, developing a new system, or 

adapting and integrating capabilities from existing and development programs. The Secretary is required to submit a report that 

addresses the cost of procuring, operating, and sustaining Blue 

Devil I aircraft system; the ability of other platforms to provide 

similar intelligence capabilities; and a listing of related U.S. Air 

Force and Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency (DARPA) 

programs. The report should be coordinated with the Commander 

of U.S. Special Operations Command and the Director of DARPA. 

We agree that the necessary capability to sustain is both widearea motion imagery combined with precision signal geolocation. 

The integration of these two capabilities provides significant operational utility. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
523 

Subtitle C—Missile Defense Programs 

Improvements to acquisition accountability reports on ballistic missile defense system (sec. 231) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 234) that would require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to make 

certain improvements to the cost estimates included in its annual 

acquisition accountability reports on the ballistic missile defense 

system (BMDS), and to provide a report on the plans and schedule 

for making such improvements. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would clarify that each 

cost estimate shall include all of the operation and sustainment 

(O&S) costs for which the Director is responsible, and also include 

a summary description of the O&S functions and costs for which 

the military departments are responsible, consistent with the Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum of June 10, 2011, on funding responsibilities for BMDS elements. 

We note that, although the MDA is required to provide life-cycle 

cost estimates of its acquisition programs—including O&S costs— 

it does not include in those cost estimates the O&S costs for which 

the military departments that own and operate elements of the 

BMDS are responsible. As the Government Accountability Office 

has noted, this makes it difficult to understand the comprehensive 

life-cycle costs of BMDS elements. Therefore, we direct the Director 

of the MDA to work with the military departments that own or operate elements of the BMDS to make a recommendation for how 

those functions and related costs should be reported in either future annual BMDS Accountability Reports or other similar reports 

to Congress, including annual budget submission justification materials. We believe that the military departments should provide to 

the congressional defense committees the life-cycle cost estimates 

for the O&S functions of the BMDS elements for which they are 

responsible, and urge them to do so as soon as possible. Furthermore, we expect the Director of the MDA to take steps to ensure 

that the cost estimate improvements required by the provision are 

made in a manner as consistent as practicable with the guidance 

issued pursuant to section 832 of Public Law 112–81, relative to 

O&S costs, and with the guidance issued pursuant to section 

2334(d) of title 10, United States Code, relative to confidence levels 

of baseline cost estimates. 

Prohibition on use of funds for MEADS program (sec. 232) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 231) that would prohibit the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2014 funds for the 

Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), and would also 

place conditions on the harvesting of MEADS technology. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 236) that would prohibit the use of fiscal year 2014 funds for 

MEADS. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

We note that the Department of Defense has invested more than 

$2.5 billion in the development of MEADS technology, and has a 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
524 

substantial interest in making constructive use of any MEADS 

data and technology owned by the United States. We direct the 

Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees, not later than 180 days after the enactment of 

this Act, providing: (1) An explanation of who owns the technology 

and data developed under the tri-national MEADS development 

program; (2) How the Secretary intends to ensure that the Department gets the maximum benefit from the U.S. investment in 

MEADS, including by making such technology and data appropriately available for ‘‘technology harvesting’’ for improvements to 

the Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) system program of 

record, taking into account the report required by House Report 

113–102, ‘‘Technology harvesting of the Medium Extended Air Defense System’’; and (3) U.S. policy regarding 3rd Party Sales of 

such technology, which we believe could be of benefit to the United 

States and its allies. 

Prohibition on availability of funds for integration of certain missile 

defense systems; report on regional ballistic missile defense (sec. 

233) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

232) that would express the sense of Congress regarding regional 

ballistic missile defenses and would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on 

the status and progress of regional missile defense programs and 

efforts. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would clarify the elements of the required report. It 

would also include a prohibition on the use of fiscal year 2014 

funds to integrate missile defense systems of the People’s Republic 

of China into U.S. missile defense systems. 

We are concerned that the Government of Turkey made an initial 

decision to purchase a Chinese air and missile defense system for 

its territorial use. Such a system would not be compatible with, 

and should not be integrated with, missile defense systems of the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 

We direct that, not later than 60 days after submission of the report required by the provision, the Government Accountability Office shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees providing its views on the report. 

We further direct that, not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act, the Joint Staff and Joint Force Component Command for Integrated Missile Defense (JFCC-IMD) shall provide a 

briefing to the congressional defense committees with respect to 

any significant changes in the regional missile defense environment since the April 2011 Joint Capability Mix (JCM) III Study 

was completed, and whether and how the study could be updated 

to provide useful insights for future force structure levels and employment plans. The briefing should be based on updated intelligence information, updated missile defense systems efficacy and 

reliability information, and current and planned future budget levels, and any other matters the Joint Staff and JFCC-IMD consider 

useful. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
525 

Availability of funds for co-production of Iron Dome short-range 

rocket defense system in the United States (sec. 234) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 237) that would au- thorize $15.0 million to enhance the capability for producing the 

Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system in the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize up to $15.0 million for non-recurring engineering costs associated with 

establishing the capacity for United States industry to produce 

parts and components of the Iron Dome system in the United 

States, subject to an agreement between the United States and 

Israel for co-production of Iron Dome parts and components. The 

provision would also require the Director of the Missile Defense 

Agency to submit a report to Congress on the plan to implement 

such agreement, including the estimated costs, schedule, and steps 

to minimize costs to the government of the United States to implement the agreement. The provision would also clarify that it is not 

intended to alter the planned Iron Dome procurement schedule or 

numbers, and would express the sense of Congress on the importance of a second production source in the United States. The provision would also require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the 

congressional defense committees a report on the status of missile 

defense cooperation between the United States and Israel. 

We believe it is important for industry to pay for a substantial 

share of the cost of establishing a co-production capacity in the 

United States. Further, we direct that the Missile Defense Agency 

not use funds from other programs of record to pay for establishing 

an Iron Dome production capacity in the United States. 

Additional missile defense radar for the protection of the United 

States homeland (sec. 235) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

234) that would require the Missile Defense Agency to deploy an 

additional missile defense radar for homeland missile defense, and 

would authorize $30.0 million for initial costs toward such deployment. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Missile Defense Agency to deploy a missile defense radar at a location 

optimized to support defense of the homeland against long-range 

missile threats from North Korea, and would authorize $30.0 million for initial costs toward such deployment. The provision would 

also require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the United 

States is able to deploy additional tracking and discrimination sensor capabilities to support defense of the United States from future 

long-range ballistic missile threats that emerge from Iran. The provision would require the Secretary to submit a report on what sensor capabilities will be available for deployment on the Atlantic 

side of the United States by 2019, or sooner if Iran flight tests 

long-range missiles before then, and the manner in which such capabilities will be maintained to ensure they can be deployed in 

time to support the missile defense of the United States from longrange ballistic missile threats from Iran. We note that the seaVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00557 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
526 

based X-band radar platform and the Cobra Judy ship-based radar 

platform could serve as interim or surge sensor capabilities in the 

Atlantic region to support homeland defense against future longrange missile threats that emerge from Iran. 

The agreement also authorizes an additional $50.0 million for the 

Missile Defense Agency to develop enhanced discrimination capability for the Ballistic Missile Defense System, as reflected in the 

tables in section 4201. The Missile Defense Agency and the missile 

defense operational community have identified such discrimination 

enhancement as a priority for improving the future effectiveness of 

missile defenses, particularly for homeland missile defense. 

Evaluation of options for future ballistic missile defense sensor architectures (sec. 236) 

The Senate committee-reported bill included a provision (sec. 

235) that would require the Secretary of Defense to evaluate options for future ballistic missile defense sensor architectures and to 

report to the congressional defense committees the results of the 

evaluation. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would include consideration of options for maximizing 

the use of various sensors for missile defense and for other missions. 

Plans to improve the ground-based midcourse defense system (sec. 

237) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 236) that would require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Commander of the U.S. Northern Command to develop options and a 

plan to improve the kill assessment capability and the hit assessment capability of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) 

system, and to submit a report on the development of such capabilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would also require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency 

to submit a plan for the use of fiscal years 2013 and 2014 funds 

to develop, test, and deploy an upgraded enhanced exo-atmospheric 

kill vehicle for the GMD system. 

If the report required by the provision is not submitted by April 

1, 2014, we direct the Department of Defense to provide a briefing 

to the congressional defense committees on the subject matter required in the report not later than April 1, 2014. 

The agreement authorizes $100.0 million for design and development of common kill vehicle technology for an upgraded enhanced 

exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the GMD system, an increase of 

$30.0 million above the budget request, to accelerate design and development efforts, as reflected in the tables in section 4201. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
527 

Report on potential future homeland ballistic missile defense options (sec. 238) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

231) that would express the sense of Congress concerning the importance of homeland ballistic missile defense against the threat of 

limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran, and 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on potential future options for enhancing homeland ballistic missile defense. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision requiring the report, with a clarifying amendment. 

The agreement authorizes an additional $80.0 million for the 

Missile Defense Agency to continue efforts to understand the cause 

of the problem that resulted in the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system flight test failure on July 5, 2013, using the Capability Enhancement-I (CE–I) kill vehicle, and take the necessary 

steps to correct the problem and demonstrate the correction in an 

intercept flight test. 

The CE–I flight test failure occurred after the budget was submitted, and no funds were planned or budgeted to analyze and correct the problem, or to conduct another intercept flight test to demonstrate the correction of the problem. The Missile Defense Agency 

has stated that its highest priority is correcting the problems associated with the flight test failures of the CE–II and CE–I kill vehicles, and demonstrating the successful corrections through additional intercept flight tests. 

We direct that, not later than 60 days after the submission of the 

report required by the provision, the Government Accountability 

Office provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees 

providing its views on the report. 

Briefings on status of implementation of certain missile defense 

matters (sec. 239) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 232) that would require the Missile Defense Agency to construct and make operational in fiscal year 2018 an additional homeland missile defense 

site, designed to complement the existing sites in Alaska and California, to deal more effectively with missile threats from the Middle 

East. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide, not later than 180 days after the completion of the site evaluation study required by section 227(a) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public 

Law 112–239), and 1 year later, a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the status of current efforts and plans to implement the requirements of section 227, including progress and 

plans toward preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement 

required by section 227(b), and the development of the contingency 

plan for the deployment of an additional homeland missile defense 

interceptor site, in case the President determines to proceed with 

such an additional deployment, as required by section 227(d). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
528 

The agreement authorizes an additional $20.0 million for the 

Missile Defense Agency to continue activities relative to the site 

evaluation study, the Environmental Impact Statement, and planning activities consistent with the requirements of section 227(d) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, including the development of the contingency plan for the deployment of an additional homeland missile defense interceptor site. 

Such planning activities should include efforts to update the relevant planning documents from the deployment of missile fields at 

Fort Greely, Alaska, and plans for the possible deployment of a 

ground-based-interceptor site in Europe, to prepare for the potential deployment of an additional missile defense site in the continental United States, as well as such other preliminary planning 

activities as can practicably be commenced prior to site selection, 

or updated upon site selection. 

Sense of Congress and report on NATO and missile defense burdensharing (sec. 240) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 238) that would require the President to seek specific levels of funding from the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for various phases of 

the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) to missile defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would express the sense 

of Congress concerning the increasing importance of burden-sharing among the NATO allies for missile defense, and would require 

the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees providing: (1) The estimated costs for the EPAA; 

(2) A description of the level of NATO burden-sharing for the costs 

of NATO missile defense, including the EPAA; and (3) An assessment of, and recommendations for, areas where the Secretary believes NATO and its members could make additional burden-sharing contributions to NATO missile defense, including the EPAA. 

We note that, as declared at the 2010 Lisbon Summit, the United 

States and its NATO allies share a strong interest in developing 

and deploying an operationally-effective and cost-effective missile 

defense capability to defend the territory, population, and military 

forces of NATO—including forward deployed United States forces— 

in Europe. The United States and its NATO partners are making 

a variety of contributions, both individually and collectively, to 

NATO missile defense, including through national contributions, 

host-nation basing agreements, and collective funding arrangements. The United States is contributing to the EPAA as its national contribution to NATO missile defense, and a number of 

NATO allies are providing important support for the EPAA, as well 

as other support for NATO missile defense. The cancellation of 

Phase 4 of the EPAA eliminated the contribution that the EPAA 

would have made toward augmenting U.S. homeland missile defenses against potential Iranian intercontinental ballistic missiles. 

We believe that burden-sharing is an important NATO principle, 

and is important to the recently adopted NATO mission of missile 

defense of NATO territory, population, and military forces. ThereVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00560 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
529 

fore, while recognizing the important support provided by a number of NATO allies for key aspects of the EPAA, we believe the 

U.S. Government should encourage other NATO members to provide additional support for NATO missile defense, including the 

EPAA, to ensure an appropriate level of burden-sharing. 

Sense of Congress on deployment of regional ballistic missile defense 

capabilities (sec. 241) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 233) that would limit 

the use of funds to remove United States missile defense equipment in East Asia until after certain conditions are met. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would express the sense 

of Congress concerning the deployment of regional ballistic missile 

defense capabilities. 

Sense of Congress on procurement of capability enhancement II 

exoatmospheric kill vehicle (sec. 242) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 239) that would express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should 

not procure additional Capability Enhancement II (CE–II) exo-atmospheric kill vehicles for deployment until after the date on which 

a successful operational flight test of the CE–II has occurred. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Annual Comptroller General report on the amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program (sec. 251) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 251) that would require the Comptroller General to provide an annual report on the 

Marine Corps’ amphibious combat vehicle acquisition program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Annual Comptroller General of the United States report on the acquisition program for the VXX Presidential Helicopter (sec. 252) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

251) that would require the Comptroller General to produce an annual report on the VXX presidential helicopter program until the 

program enters full-rate production or is cancelled, whichever 

comes first. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical/ 

clarifying amendment. 

Report on strategy to improve body armor (sec. 253) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 252) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional deVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00561 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
530 

fense committees a comprehensive research and development strategy for achieving significant weight reductions for body armor components. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with a technical amendment. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Establishment of Communications Security Review and Advisory 

Board (sec. 261) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 261) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a senior-level body, to 

be known as the Cryptographic Modernization Review and Advisory Board, to assess and advise the cryptographic modernization 

activities of the Department of Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Chief Information Officer to chair the 

Board, with the Board monitoring overall communications security, 

cryptographic modernization, and key management efforts of the 

Department. 

Extension and expansion of mechanisms to provide funds for defense laboratories for research and development of technologies 

for military missions (sec. 262) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 263) that would extend 

section 219 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2009 

(Public Law 110–417) to September 2020. In addition, this provision would allow for funds to be accumulated for not more than 5 

years for individual Department of Defense laboratory revitalization projects with costs up to $4 million, provided prior notification 

of the total project cost is provided to the congressional defense 

committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

215) that extended section 219 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2009 (Public Law 110–417) to September 2020. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that requires an annual report on the use of the authority granted 

by this provision, as well as some other clarifying elements. 

Extension of authority to award prizes for advanced technology 

achievements (sec. 263) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 264) that would extend 

the authority of the Department of Defense to award prizes for advanced technology achievements until September 2018. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 213) that would extend this authority until September 2017. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
531 

Five-year extension of pilot program to include technology protection 

features during research and development of certain defense 

systems (sec. 264) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 265) that would extend 

the Defense Exportability Features pilot program until October 1, 

2020. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 214). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Briefing on biometrics of the Department of Defense (sec. 265) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 216) that would place 

limitations on the Department of Defense to obligate or expend 

more than 75 percent of funds for future biometric architectures or 

systems until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense submits a report to the congressional defense committees assessing the future 

program structure and architectural requirements for biometrics 

enabling capability. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would remove the funding limitation and request a briefing, 

including an assessment of the governance process for requirements across the Department of Defense, as well as interagency 

and international partners. 

Sense of Congress on importance of aligning common missile compartment of Ohio-class replacement program with the United 

Kingdom’s Vanguard successor program (sec. 266) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 223) that would make 

a series of findings and express the sense of Congress regarding 

the importance of aligning the common missile compartment of the 

Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine program with the Vanguardclass successor program of the United Kingdom of Great Britain 

and Northern Ireland. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

eliminates the findings contained in the House provision. 

Sense of Congress on counter-electronics high power microwave missile project (sec. 267) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 224) that expressed a 

sense of Congress urging the Air Force to consider the Counterelectronics High Power Microwave Advanced Missile Program 

(CHAMP) technology capability demonstration as a potential weapon option available to combatant commanders by 2016. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

clarifying the need to complete developmental planning for such 

weapons systems if requirements are established by the combatant 

commanders in the future. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
532 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Conventional Prompt Global Strike Program 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

211) that would prohibit the Department of Defense from executing 

any funds for the Conventional Prompt Global Strike (CPGS) program until 60 days after they deliver a report to the congressional 

defense committees addressing the policy consideration concerning 

the ambiguity problems regarding the launch of CPGS missiles 

from submarine platforms. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We agree that no more than 75 percent of the funds authorized 

to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for research, development, test and evaluation and available for the Prompt Global 

Strike Capability Development program (PE#64165D8Z) for the 

CPGS program should be obligated or expended for any activities 

relating to the development of a submarine-launched capability 

under that program until 60 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees 

a report that addresses the policy considerations concerning any 

potential ambiguity problems regarding the launch of a conventionally-armed missile from submarine platforms, potential verification 

measures, any target sets the Secretary believes a submarinelaunched conventionally-armed missile could reach that a missile 

on board another platform could not reach, the comparative cost 

considerations of submarine-launched conventional missiles and 

such systems launched by other platforms. 

We also note that in congressional testimony, the Commander, 

U.S. Strategic Command, stated that ‘‘[t]oday, the only prompt 

global strike capability to engage potentially time-sensitive, fleeting 

targets continues to be ballistic missile systems armed with nuclear weapons. We continue to require a deployed conventional 

prompt strike capability to provide the President a range of flexible 

military options to address a small number of highest-value targets, including in an anti-access and area denial environment.’’ 

Unmanned combat air system demonstration testing requirement 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 217) that would require the Secretary of the Navy to demonstrate unmanned, autonomous aerial refueling within the X–47B aircraft testing and evaluation program. The X–47B is an unmanned aircraft being tested 

under the Unmanned Combat Air System (UCAS) demonstration 

program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We understand that the Chief of Naval Operations has decided 

that, unlike the original Navy plan, the Navy will continue flying 

the X–47B during fiscal year 2014, and will pursue a number of 

risk reduction activities. We support these Navy plans for continuing risk reduction activities for UCAS, and encourage the Navy 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
533 

to consider performing the aerial refueling demonstration as part 

of these additional risk reduction activities. 

Requirement to complete individual carbine testing 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 221) that would require the Department of the Army to complete planned testing for 

an individual carbine. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain this provision. 

We understand that during the Army’s testing of eight candidate 

carbines under the individual carbine program that none of the carbines met the Army’s target for improved reliability requirements. 

We further understand that these results may be attributable to 

the interactions between the carbines and the recently introduced 

M855A1 standard 5.56mm rounds that were used during the test 

and evaluation. These test results suggest the Army may have used 

an unrealistically high reliability standard. 

Accordingly, we urge the Army to re-evaluate the reliability 

standard used for this test, as well as other standards as appropriate. We encourage the Secretary of the Army to consider a process for continuous test and evaluation of alternatives to the M4A1 

carbine that is based on realistic operational requirements and 

with significantly improved, but reasonably achievable, performance and reliability. We note that, while the Army may have reduced needs and limited funds to procure large numbers of new rifles or carbines in the near future, maintaining research and development efforts for new small arms in this class is essential to ensure that the industrial base can respond to sudden increases in 

demand as it did during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation 

Enduring Freedom. In this regard, the Secretary of the Army, or 

designee, is directed to provide the congressional defense committees a briefing that details the Army’s long range standard rifle 

and carbine modernization strategy. This briefing shall be provided 

not later than April 1, 2014, and shall include the Army’s plans, 

including where appropriate, schedules and funding profiles, for requirements development, technology research and development, 

procurement, and test and evaluation of commercially available 

and militarily suitable alternatives. 

Establishment of funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser 

weapon system 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 222) that would establish a funding line and fielding plan for a Navy laser weapon system for fiscal year 2018 and beyond. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We are supportive of accelerating the development and transition 

of directed energy weapons to programs of record, in the Navy as 

well as the other military departments. However, we believe that 

it is premature to create such a funding line. We also note that 

many of the current activities supporting development of directed 

energy weapons are already embedded in existing research and deVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00565 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
534 

velopment program elements, and therefore the creation of a consolidated funding line at this stage could be disruptive to those efforts and potentially detrimental to overall efforts to develop and 

field a militarily-relevant system. 

Analysis of alternatives for successor to Precision Tracking Space 

System 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 235) that would require the Director of the Missile Defense Agency to perform an 

analysis of alternatives for a successor sensor system to the Precision Tracking Space System. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress on 30th anniversary of the Strategic Defense Initiative 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 240) that would express the sense of Congress concerning the 30th anniversary of the 

Strategic Defense Initiative. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress on negotiations affecting the missile defenses of 

the United States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 242) that would express the sense of Congress concerning negotiations with the Russian Federation that would affect the missile defenses of the 

United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Report on main battle tank fuel efficiency 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 253) that would require the Secretary of the Army to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on an investment strategy to accelerate 

fuel efficiency improvements to the engine and transmission of the 

M1 Abrams tank. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the Army and Marine Corps currently have no plan 

to replace the M1A2 or M1A1 Abrams main battle tank. We are 

also aware that the Army intends to proceed with a series of engineering change proposals that will incrementally enhance the platform’s capabilities. We believe that the Army should accelerate the 

next series of Abrams upgrades where warranted by capability 

gaps or opportunities, technological maturity, and affordability. In 

this regard, the Army and Marine Corps should consider replacement of the current engine with a modern, fuel efficient power 

train. Therefore, the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with 

the Secretary of the Navy, is directed to submit a report to the conVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00566 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
535 

gressional defense committees, not later than June 1, 2014, on a 

business case analysis and an investment strategy that could accelerate the technology development and engineering change proposal 

processes to include a modern fuel efficient engine and transmission for the M1 Abrams series main battle tank. 

Report on powered rail system 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 254) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the congressional defense committees that comprehensively reviews and compares powered rail systems for the M4 Carbine system. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

The Secretary of the Army, or designee, is directed to provide a 

report to the congressional defense committees not later than April 

1, 2014 on an assessment of the current M4/M16-mounted battery 

requirements associated with a 3-day dismounted mission for an 

Army infantry platoon compared to the same unit and mission if 

the members were equipped with an integrated weapon-mounted 

power source. The assessment should compare the battery requirements, numbers, weight, costs, as well as the likely impact on the 

operational functionality of the M4/M16 configured with an integrated power source, including weapons system effectiveness, efficiency, ergonomics, maintainability, reliability, and related risk. 

The assessment should also include a business case analysis of the 

potential acquisition and sustainment costs and savings associated 

with transitioning to an integrated M4/M16-mounted power technology to replace batteries for individual weapon-mounted components. Finally, the assessment should address the potential utility, 

if any, of incorporating a data link via such a weapon-mounted 

power source between soldier communications systems and soldier 

and weapon sensors. The Director, Operational Test and Evaluation is also directed to oversee the Army’s live fire or other operational testing, if any, conducted as part of gathering data for this 

report. 

Report on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics scholarship program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 255) that would require the Secretary of Defense to assess whether the Department 

of Defense Science, Mathematics and Research for Transformation 

(SMART) scholarship program, or similar programs, could meet the 

undergraduate and graduate science, technology, engineering and 

mathematics (STEM) workforce needs of the intelligence community (IC). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We note that the national security community, in general, faces 

growing challenges with meeting its STEM workforce needs, in particular, attracting top-level U.S. citizens that are eligible for security clearances. The SMART program was established by the Department of Defense to attract and retain promising candidates 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
536 

and STEM leaders into the Department, including components of 

the IC. SMART provides scholarships to students pursuing technical degrees in disciplines of interest to the Department and the 

IC. We recognize that the SMART program has been useful in 

meeting its intent and believe that data provided on the program 

shows that the SMART program could be used by a broader community within the IC, but any further expansion would require further socialization to increase participation, as well as additional resources to fund any additional students supporting the needs of the 

IC. 

Clarification of eligibility of a State to participate in defense experimental program to stimulate competitive research 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 262) that would modify 

the eligibility requirements for the Defense Experimental Program 

to Stimulate Competitive Research (DEPSCOR) to bring it more in 

line with the eligibility requirements of the Experimental Program 

to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCOR) under the National 

Science Foundation (NSF). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that while the Department of Defense maintains the 

statutory authority for DEPSCOR, the Department has not included funds to support the program since 2009 due to changing research needs and priorities. Additionally, even should funds be 

made available for DEPSCOR in the future, we would be concerned 

about potential duplication with NSF’s EPSCOR. DEPSCOR was 

originally established as a separate activity from EPSCOR in section 257 of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 

1995 (Public Law 103–337) because the needs of the Department 

were not being met by the EPSCOR. Should the Department 

choose to revitalize the DEPSCOR activity, we believe it should 

maintain a separate and distinct eligibility requirement to ensure 

that it is able to meet the separate and distinct research needs of 

the Department of Defense. 

Briefing on power and energy research conducted at university-affiliated research centers 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 266) that would require the Secretary of Defense to brief the congressional defense 

authorizing committees on power and energy research conducted at 

university-affiliated research centers. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Approval of certain new uses of research, development, test, and 

evaluation land 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 267) that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense or the head of any other department 

or agency of the Federal Government from finalizing any decision 

regarding new land use activity on ranges, test areas, or other land 

used by the Department of Defense (DOD) for activities related to 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
537 

research, development, test, and evaluation and determined to be 

critical to national security unless the secretary concerned approves such activity in writing. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the DOD Siting Clearinghouse was created to preserve military readiness and protect DOD capabilities from incompatible energy infrastructure development by collaborating with 

DOD components and external stakeholders to prevent, minimize, 

or mitigate adverse impacts on military operations, readiness, and 

testing. The Clearinghouse is intended to be the single point of contact and principal advocate for DOD equities in all such deliberations. 

We understand that as a result of the Clearinghouse review of 

the Sun Zia Southwest Transmission Project, DOD raised significant concerns and identified potential impacts on the capabilities 

of the White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) in New Mexico. According to an August 7, 2013, letter from the Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment to the Principal Deputy Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), 

the route of the proposed transmission line, without mitigation, 

‘‘would result in an unacceptable risk to national security. If a bulk 

power transmission line is constructed along the selected route, it 

would preclude our capability to fully test the Joint Integrated Air 

and Missile Defense Architecture and other weapon systems under 

realistic threat environments at WSMR. This testing is absolutely 

necessary and it should be clearly understood that no other location 

exists in the United States where it is possible to conduct flight 

tests with the footprint requirements these weapons systems 

present. Critical to fully testing joint military weapons are the 

preservation of the restricted airspace (from the surface to unlimited) on the range area on WSMR, and the permanently-designated 

and specially-allocated restricted airspace in the northern extension area.’’ 

We expect that as the Sun Zia Southwest Transmission project 

approval request proceeds, DOD concerns will be addressed by the 

executive branch to preserve this critical resource. We expect that 

appropriate mitigation measures will be included concurrent to the 

issuance of a Record of Decision by BLM. 

Should DOD concerns not be addressed in this case, we direct 

the Secretary of Defense to review the processes and effectiveness 

of the DOD Siting Clearinghouse and to provide a report to the 

congressional defense committees not later than 90 days after a 

Record of Decision with proposals that will improve the ability of 

the Clearinghouse to assess impacts to national security in a timely 

manner and ultimately preserve military readiness and protect 

DOD capabilities from incompatible energy infrastructure development. 

Canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 268) that would require the Department of Defense (DOD) to provide a report on the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
538 

capability and infrastructure required to support canines as standoff detection of explosives and explosive precursors. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives no later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

of this Act. The report shall make a determination based on requirements if the DOD, and each military service, intends to develop and maintain the capability and infrastructure required to 

support canines as stand-off detection of explosives and explosive 

precursors. If deemed appropriate by the Secretary, the report shall 

also detail: (1) The acquisition process with respect to canines as 

stand-off detection of explosives and explosive precursors; (2) The 

procedures established by the DOD to ensure that canines reach or 

exceed the appropriate performance standards; (3) A plan to ensure 

that the latest data and information regarding canine capabilities 

are distributed throughout the DOD; (4) Any technologies capable 

of replacing the canine as a stand-off detection capability; and (5) 

A determination of the relevant office to oversee the above elements. 

TITLE III—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Operation and maintenance funding (sec. 301) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 301) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the armed forces and 

agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise 

provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4301. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 301). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—Energy and Environment 

Deadline for submission of reports on proposed budgets for activities 

relating to operational energy strategy (sec. 311) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 311) that would amend 

section 138c(e) of title 10, United States Code, to revise the date 

of submission for the report on the proposed budgets that were not 

certified for that fiscal year. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Facilitation of interagency cooperation in conservation programs of 

the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Interior to avoid 

or reduce adverse impacts on military readiness activities (sec. 

312) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 312) that would amend 

section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, to permit a recipient 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
539 

of funds under the Sikes Act to be able to use the funds for matching funds or cost-sharing requirements of conservation programs. 

This section would also expire the authority on October 1, 2019, 

but permit any agreements that were entered into prior to September 30, 2019, to continue according to its terms and conditions. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Reauthorization of Sikes Act (sec. 313) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 313) that would extend 

the authority of the Sikes Act through 2019. 

The Senate committee-reported bill amendment contained no 

similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Clarification of prohibition on disposing of waste in open-air burn 

pits (sec. 314) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 317) that would codify 

the definition of covered waste as it relates to the requirements established by section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010, title 10 of United States Code 2701 note (Public Law 111–84). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels 

(sec. 315) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 319) that would limit 

the Department of Defense’s (DOD) ability to purchase or produce 

biofuels until the earlier of either the date on which the Budget 

Control Act of 2011 is no longer in effect, or the date on which the 

cost of biofuel is equal to the cost of conventional fuels. The provision would provide an exception for biofuel test and certification 

and research and development. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment that would prohibit DOD funds to be used for bulk 

purchases of drop-in fuel for operational purposes during fiscal year 

2014, unless the cost of that drop-in fuel is cost competitive with 

traditional fuel, subject to a national security waiver. We note that 

the phrase ‘‘cost competitive’’ in this section generally refers to 

prices that are equal to or lower than prices offered by competitors 

for similar goods or services. However, we note that terms and conditions for particular purchases may vary; in particular, long-term 

energy purchases are likely to have different pricing structures 

from short-term or spot-market purchases. Accordingly, some flexibility in the application of this phrase is anticipated, where necessary to address such differences. We understand that average 

prices over the period of a long-term contract would be cost competitive. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
540 

Subtitle C—Logistics and Sustainment 

Strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment (sec. 321) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

312) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to develop an overarching strategy, along with an implementation plan, to integrate 

and synchronize at a Department-wide level, the services’ 

prepositioning programs. The strategy and implementation plan 

would ensure that the Department of Defense (DOD) prepositioning 

programs, both ground and afloat, align with national defense 

strategies and new DOD priorities, and emphasize joint oversight 

to maximize effectiveness and efficiencies in prepositioned materiel 

and equipment across the DOD. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Department of Defense manufacturing arsenal study and report (sec. 

322) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 322) that would require the Secretary of Defense to review current and expected manufacturing requirements across the Department of Defense to identify critical manufacturing capabilities which could be executed by 

the government-owned arsenals, and to brief the results of the review to the congressional defense committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 311) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the military services and defense agencies, to review current and expected manufacturing requirements for which there is 

no or limited domestic commercial source and which are appropriate for manufacturing within an arsenal owned by the United 

States in order to support critical manufacturing capabilities. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to review arsenals owned by the United States in order to support critical manufacturing capabilities. The agreement also directs the Government 

Accountability Office to report and assess the Department’s review 

with recommendations. 

Consideration of Army arsenals’ capabilities to fulfill manufacturing requirements (sec. 323) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 323) that would require program executive officers and program managers to solicit 

information from government-owned arsenals when undertaking a 

make-or-buy analysis, notify government-owned arsenals of the requirement, and allow arsenals that have the capability to fulfill a 

manufacturing requirement to submit a proposal for the requirement. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
541 

Strategic policy for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement 

of operating forces used to support overseas contingency operations (sec. 324) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

322) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to establish a policy 

setting forth the program and priorities of the Department of Defense for the retrograde, reconstitution, and replacement of units 

and materiel used to support overseas contingency operations. The 

provision directed that the policy shall take into account national 

security threats, the requirements of the combatant commands, the 

current readiness of the operational forces of the military departments, and risk associated with strategic depth and the time necessary to reestablish required personnel, equipment, and training 

readiness in such operating forces. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Littoral Combat Ship Strategic Sustainment Plan (sec. 325) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 321) that would require the Secretary of the Navy to submit a strategic sustainment 

plan for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program to the congressional defense committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would clarify that the strategic sustainment plan would have 

to identify specifically any contractor support needed by the LCS 

vessels when they are forward deployed. 

Strategy for improving asset tracking and in-transit visibility (sec. 

326) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 836) that would direct 

the Secretary of Defense to improve the management of defense 

equipment and supplies throughout their lifecycles by adopting and 

implementing item unique identification, radio frequency identification, biometrics, and other automated information and data capture 

technologies for the tracking, management, and accountability for 

deployed assets. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 331) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to complete 

a comprehensive strategy and implementation plan for improving 

asset tracking and in-transit visibility across the Department of 

Defense. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment that would include an operational security assessment 

to ensure all DOD assets are appropriately protected during the 

execution of the comprehensive strategy and implementation plan. 

We recognize the challenges in supply chain management, including asset tracking and in-transit visibility capabilities. We see 

this posing an acute near-term challenge, especially in light of the 

experience with retrograde operations from the Republic of Iraq 

and the on-going operations in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
542 

Furthermore, we note that supply chain management challenges 

have been an on-going source of concern for the Department of Defense, from the emergence of the Government Accountability Office’s high risk list in 1990, to the current need to achieve 

auditability and financial management goals set by the Secretary 

of Defense and Congress. 

We believe that the strategy called for by this provision is an important step to improving the Department’s supply chain management shortfalls. In developing and implementing this strategy, we 

urge the Department to look at how it can better leverage new 

technologies. For example, item unique identification, radio frequency identification, and biometrics could be more effectively used 

to interface with enterprise resource planning systems and improve 

the tracking, management, and accountability for all Department 

assets. 

Subtitle D—Reports 

Additional reporting requirements relating to personnel and unit 

readiness (sec. 331) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 331) that would amend 

the report required under section 482 of title 10, United States 

Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to report to the congressional defense committees on the ability of the geographic and 

functional combatant commanders to successfully meet their respective contingency and operational plans and key mission essential tasks. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 332) that would amend section 482 of title 10, United States 

Code, to update and streamline the quarterly readiness report to 

Congress. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment that would combine both provisions and would amend 

section 482 of title 10, United States Code. 

Modification of authorities on prioritization of funds for equipment 

readiness and strategic capability (sec. 332) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 332) that would repeal 

the requirement that the Comptroller General of the United States 

report on the Army’s progress in moving to a modular force design. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 321) that would repeal the requirement for modularity reports 

by both the Army and the Government Accountability Office and 

would also add a requirement that the Marine Corps report budget 

information regarding funding for the reset of equipment and reconstitution of prepositioned stocks. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Revision to requirement for annual submission of information regarding information technology capital assets (sec. 333) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 333) that would amend 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) to align Department of Defense high-threshold information technology Capital Asset reportVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00574 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
543 

ing with the Department’s Major Automated Information Systems 

reporting and its Exhibit 300 reporting to the Office of Management and Budget. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 333). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Modification of annual corrosion control and prevention reporting 

requirements (sec. 334) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

334) that would amend section 903(b)(5) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (P.L. 110– 

417; 10 U.S.C. 2228 note) to update the military departments’ strategic plans with performance measures and show clear linkage to 

the Department of Defense’s overarching goals and objectives as 

described in the Department’s strategic plan for corrosion control 

and prevention. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Subtitle E—Limitations and Extensions of Authority 

Certification for realignment of forces at Lajes Air Force Base, 

Azores (sec. 341) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 341) that would restrict the Secretary of the Air Force from reducing the force structure at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, (Lajes) until 30 days after the 

European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment is completed 

and is briefed to the congressional defense committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contains no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision requiring that, prior to taking any action to realign forces at Lajes, the Secretary of Defense 

must certify to the congressional defense committees that the realignment is supported by a European Infrastructure Consolidation 

Assessment. 

Limitation on performance of Department of Defense flight demonstration teams outside the United States (sec. 342) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 342) that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from using any fiscal year 2014 or 

2015 funds to allow flight demonstration teams to perform at any 

location outside the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. The Senate report accompanying S. 1197 (S. Rpt. 113–44) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 commented on Department of Defense (DOD) guidance prohibiting all 

aerial demonstrations, including flyovers, jump team demonstrations, and participation in civilian air shows and military open 

houses. The report observed that: (1) There may be certain circumstances where an exception to this general policy could provide 

some level of community engagement as a no-cost addition to activities that are required for training or readiness; and (2) DOD 

should reconsider whether this policy should be enforced on a blanket basis or whether the policy should allow for community engageVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00575 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
544 

ment if that engagement can be completed as a no-cost adjunct to 

missions fulfilling other required operational or training activities. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would prohibit spending funds for performances of flight demonstration teams outside the United States if the Department has 

cancelled any performances of flight demonstration teams inside 

the United States by reason of insufficient funds due to a sequestration. We are intending that this provision cover the Air Force 

Thunderbirds, the Navy Blue Angels and the Army Golden 

Knights. 

Limitation on funding for United States Special Operations Command National Capital Region (sec. 343) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

341) that would prohibit the expenditure of any funds for the U.S. 

Special Operations Command National Capital Region 

(USSOCOM–NCR) until 30 days after the Secretary of Defense provides the congressional defense committees a report which describes, at a minimum: (1) The purpose of the USSOCOM–NCR; (2) 

The activities to be performed by the USSOCOM–NCR; (3) An explanation of the impact of the USSOCOM–NCR on existing activities at USSOCOM headquarters; (4) A detailed breakout, by fiscal 

year, of the staffing and other costs associated with the 

USSOCOM–NCR over the future years defense program; (5) A description of the relationship between the USSOCOM–NCR and the 

Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations 

and Low-Intensity Conflict (ASD SOLIC); (6) The role of the ASD 

SOLIC in providing oversight of USSOCOM–NCR activities; and 

(7) Any other matters the Secretary deems appropriate. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Limitation on availability of funds for Trans Regional Web Initiative (sec. 344) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

343) that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from expending 

any funds in Operation and Maintenance, defense-wide (OMDW), 

for the Trans Regional Web Initiative (TRWI). 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from expending 

more than $2.0 million in OMDW for TRWI and restrict the use of 

such funds for the termination of the program as managed by U.S. 

Special Operations Command or for purposes of transitioning appropriate TRWI capabilities to other agencies. 

In light of budget concerns for the U.S. Government, resource 

constraints for the Department of Defense, and shifts in the geopolitical environment and security strategies, we note our concern 

with regard to the Department’s direction for strategically engaging in the information environment. We remain skeptical of the effectiveness of the websites established under the TRWI and believe 

that available resources may better be used to support tactical and 

operational military information support activities. We believe strategic information operations activities, like TRWI, may more approVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00576 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
545 

priately be managed by other relevant U.S. Government agencies, 

with the Department of Defense focused on contributing to an 

interagency approach that is responsive to military-specific operational requirements. 

If the Secretary of Defense deems it to be in the national security 

interests of the United States and appropriate under current fiscal 

pressures, we note the Department of Defense may use funds authorized by this Act for TRWI to conduct a pilot project using existing authorities with an appropriate U.S. Government agency, such 

as the Broadcasting Board of Governors. Such a pilot could be used 

to demonstrate the transition of appropriate TRWI capabilities to 

such agency and support the strategic information operations requirements of the Geographic Combatant Commanders. We believe 

that any such pilot should seek to demonstrate responsiveness to 

the time sensitive needs of the Department of Defense while integrating such activities with broader U.S. strategic communications 

objectives. Consistent with this provision, we expect that the Department of Defense will not request additional funding for TRWI 

in fiscal year 2015 and beyond. 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Gifts made for the benefit of military musical units (sec. 351) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 599) that would amend 

section 974 of title 10, United States Code, to require that any gift 

made on the condition that the gift be used for the benefit of a military musical unit be credited to the appropriation or account providing the funds for such musical unit. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize service 

secretaries to accept contributions of money, personal property, or 

services on the condition that such money, property, or services be 

used for the benefit of a military musical unit, and requiring that 

such contributions be credited to the appropriation or account for 

that musical unit. 

Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms 

(sec. 352) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 351) that would establish as national policy a requirement for all the U.S. military services to use a joint combat camouflage uniform by October 1, 2018, 

with certain exceptions. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 351) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to reduce the 

separate development and fielding of service-specific combat and 

camouflage utility uniforms in order to collectively adopt and field 

the same combat and camouflage utility uniforms for use by all 

members of the Armed Forces. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment that would combine both provisions and eliminate the 

2018 deadline. 

We note the provision adopted makes it the policy of the United 

States for the Secretary of Defense to eliminate the development 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
546 

and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and camouflage utility 

uniforms and families of uniforms, in order to adopt and field a 

common combat and camouflage utility uniform, or family of uniforms, for specific combat environments, to be used by all members 

of the Armed Forces. Each Armed Force will be prohibited from 

adopting new combat and camouflage utility uniforms unless: (1) 

All the Armed Forces adopt the same uniform or family of uniforms; (2) An Armed Force adopts a uniform currently in use by another Armed Force; or (3) The Secretary of Defense grants an exception, based on unique circumstances or operational requirements. 

We note that exceptions granted to this policy include: (1) Combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms for 

use by special operations personnel; (2) Engineering modifications 

to existing combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of 

uniforms such as power harnessing or generating textiles, fire resistant fabrics, and anti-vector, anti-microbial, and anti-bacterial 

treatments; (3) Ancillary uniform items such as headwear, footwear, body armor, and other items designated by the secretaries of 

the military departments; (4) Vehicle crew uniforms; (5) Servicespecific cosmetic modifications; or (6) existing Service-specific uniforms that meet operational requirements. 

We note that a secretary of a military department may not prevent the secretary of another military department from authorizing 

the use of any combat or camouflage utility uniform or family of 

uniforms approved for use by an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of the secretary. Furthermore, the secretary of a military department shall formally register with the Joint Clothing and Textiles Governance Board all current and future combat uniforms, 

camouflage utility uniforms, and families of uniforms. 

We also note that 60 days after the enactment of this Act, the 

Secretary of Defense shall issue implementation guidance that requires the secretaries of the military departments to: (1) Establish 

joint performance criteria for the design, development, fielding, and 

characteristics of combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms and include that criteria in all new requirements 

documents; (2) Continue to work together to assess and develop 

new technologies that could be incorporated into future combat and 

camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms to improve 

warfighter survivability; (3) Ensure that new combat and camouflage utility uniforms and families of uniforms meet the geographic 

and operational requirements of the commanders of the combatant 

commands; and (4) Ensure that all new combat and camouflage 

utility uniforms and families of uniforms achieve interoperability 

with all components of individual warfighter systems, including 

body armor, organizational clothing and equipment, and other individual protective systems. 

We fully expect the Secretary of Defense to enforce this policy 

and not deviate from its intent to reduce the separate development 

and fielding of Armed Force-specific combat and camouflage uniforms and families of uniforms. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
547 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Authorization of appropriations for the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 302) that would increase funding for the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group by 

$13.4 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note the funding tables reflect an increase of $35.0 million 

for the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group. 

Authorization of appropriations for Crisis Response Force 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 303) that would in- crease funding for Crisis Response Force by $10.6 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note the funding tables reflect an increase of $40.0 million 

for Crisis Response Force. 

Cooperative agreements under Sikes Act for land management related to Department of Defense readiness activities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 314) that would amend 

section 103A of the Sikes Act, section 670c–1 of title 16, United 

States Code, to permit lump sum payment and accrual of interest 

used for the purposes of the original agreement. This section would 

also permit the cooperative agreements to be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the U.S. Government, and sets limitations on agreements that are not on military 

installations. Finally, this section would also expire the authority 

on October 1, 2019, but permit any agreements that were entered 

into prior to September 30, 2019, to continue according to its terms 

and conditions. 

The Senate committee-reported bill amendment contained no 

similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain this provision. 

Exclusions from definition of ‘‘chemical substance’’ under Toxic Substances Control Act 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 315) that would modify 

section 2602(2)(B) of title 15, United States Code, to add to the exclusions any component of any article including shot, bullets and 

other projectiles, propellants when manufactured for or used in 

such an article, and primers. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

Exemption of Department of Defense from alternative fuel procurement requirement 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 316) that would amend 

section 526 of the Energy Independence Security Act (Section 42 of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
548 

United States Code 17142) to exempt the Department of Defense 

from the requirements related to contracts for alternative or synthetic fuel in that section. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Limitation on plan, design, refurbishing, or construction of biofuels 

refineries 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 318) that would require the Department of Defense to obtain a congressional authorization before entering into a contract for the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuels refinery. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Military readiness and southern sea otter conservation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 320) that would amend 

section 631 of title 10, United States Code, by adding a provision 

permitting the Secretary of the Defense to establish ‘‘Southern Sea 

Otter Military Readiness Areas.’’ This provision would exempt 

southern sea otters from the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 

U.S.C. 1533, 1538) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 

(16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain this provision. 

Assessment of outreach for small business concerns owned and controlled by women and minorities required before conversion of 

certain functions to contractor performance 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 324) that would forbid 

a Department of Defense function performed by Department of Defense civilian employees and tied to a military base from being converted into a contractor function until the Secretary of Defense conducts an assessment to determine if the Department of Defense has 

carried out sufficient outreach programs to assist small businesses 

owned and controlled by women and socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain this provision. 

Ordnance related records review and reporting requirement for 

Vieques and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 334) that would require the Secretary of Defense conduct a review of all Department 

of Defense records detailing the historical use of military munitions 

and training on Vieques and Culebra Islands, Puerto Rico. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
549 

We note that the Department of Defense, for land and water 

sites on Culebra Island for which the Department is responsible, 

has completed historical research under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) 

process and issued Preliminary Assessment reports concerning the 

Department’s former use of sites on Culebra Island for live-fire 

training. 

We also note that for these sites, the Army has completed site 

inspections and is currently conducting remedial investigations 

that will determine whether an environmental response action is 

required at specific sites. 

Finally, we note that the Department of Defense is in the process 

of cleaning up portions of the former operational ranges on Vieques 

and also is conducting preliminary assessments, site inspections, 

and remedial investigations to determine whether a response action is required under CERCLA at Vieques. Therefore, we encourage the Department of Defense to work with the Commonwealth of 

Puerto Rico to ensure the documents and reports from the historical records reviews and investigations that the Department of Defense and the Army completed for those former military sites on 

Culebra and Vieques are made available to the public. 

Authorization to institute a centralized, automated mail redirection 

system to improve the delivery of absentee ballots to military 

personnel serving outside the United States 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

352) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer up 

to $4.5 million from defense-wide operation and maintenance to the 

Postal Service Fund for purposes of implementing the modernization of the U.S. Postal Service’s mail delivery system to improve 

the delivery of absentee ballots to military personnel serving outside the United States. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We understand that alternate funding has been used to modernize the U.S. Postal Service’s mail delivery system to improve the 

delivery of absentee ballots to military personnel serving outside 

the United States. 

TITLE IV—MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A—Active Forces 

End strengths for active forces (sec. 401) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 401) that would authorize the following end strengths for active duty personnel of the 

armed forces as of September 30, 2014: Army, 520,000; Navy, 

323,600; Marine Corps, 190,200; and Air Force, 327,600. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 401). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

End strength levels for the active forces for fiscal year 2014 are 

set forth in the following table: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
550 

Service FY 2013 

Authorized 

FY 2014 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2014 

Request 

FY 2013 

Authorized 

Army ...................................................................... 552,100 520,000 520,000 0 ¥32,100 

Navy ....................................................................... 322,700 323,600 323,600 0 900 

Marine Corps ......................................................... 197,300 190,200 190,200 0 ¥7,100 

Air Force ................................................................ 329,460 327,600 327,600 0 ¥1,860 

DOD Total ..................................................... 1,401,560 1,361,400 1,361,400 0 ¥40,160 

Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels 

and in annual limitation on certain end strength reductions 

(sec. 402) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 402) that would establish the following minimum end strengths for active-duty personnel 

as of September 30, 2014: Army, 520,000; Navy, 323,600; Marine 

Corps, 190,200; and Air Force, 327,600. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would establish minimum active-duty end strengths for the 

Army of 510,000 and the Marine Corps of 188,000, and would 

amend section 403 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to increase the maximum 

annual reduction in end strength authorized by that section for the 

Army to 25,000 and for the Marine Corps to 7,500. 

Minimum end strength levels for active-duty personnel for fiscal 

year 2014 are set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2013 

Authorized 

FY 2014 Change from 

Recommendation FY 2013 

Army ............................................................................................................ 542,700 510,000 ¥32,700 

Navy ............................................................................................................ 322,700 323,600 900 

Marine Corps ............................................................................................... 193,500 188,000 ¥5,500 

Air Force ...................................................................................................... 329,460 327,600 ¥1,860 

DOD Total ........................................................................................... 1,388,360 1,349,200 ¥39,160 

We note that continued fiscal constraints have forced the Army 

and the Marine Corps to alter their end strength reduction plans 

to reach their pre-sequester end strength targets of 490,000 for the 

Army and 182,100 for the Marine Corps by the end of fiscal year 

2015, 2 years before originally anticipated. In order to maintain a 

balance between end strength, readiness of the force, and modernization, we will support this altered reduction plan. However, 

we remain concerned that unfettered reductions in end strength 

will have a detrimental impact on force structure and, ultimately, 

operational mission capability and capacity among the services, 

and harm the morale of the force. The services should be very cautious in their efforts to further reduce the force to ensure that we 

do not break faith with those who continue to serve in the current 

conflicts, and those who have served our nation in war. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
551 

Subtitle B—Reserve Forces 

End strengths for Selected Reserve (sec. 411) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 411) that would authorize the following end strengths for Selected Reserve personnel, 

including the end strengths for reserves on active duty in support 

of the reserves, as of September 30, 2014: the Army National 

Guard of the United States, 354,200; the Army Reserve, 205,000; 

the Navy Reserve, 59,100; the Marine Corps Reserve, 39,600; the 

Air National Guard of the United States, 105,400; the Air Force 

Reserve, 70,400; and the Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 411). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

End strength levels for the Selected Reserve for fiscal year 2014 

are set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2013 

Authorized 

FY 2014 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2014 

Request 

FY 2013 

Authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 358,200 354,200 354,200 0 ¥4,000 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 205,000 205,000 205,000 0 0 

Navy Reserve ......................................................... 62,500 59,100 59,100 0 ¥3,400 

Marine Corps Reserve ........................................... 39,600 39,600 39,600 0 0 

Air National Guard ................................................ 105,700 105,400 105,400 0 ¥300 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 70,880 70,400 70,400 0 ¥480 

DOD Total ..................................................... 841,880 833,700 833,700 0 ¥8,180 

Coast Guard Reserve ............................................ 9,000 9,000 9,000 0 0 

End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves 

(sec. 412) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 412) that would authorize the following end strengths for reserves on active duty in 

support of the reserve components as of September 30, 2014: the 

Army National Guard of the United States, 32,060; the Army Reserve, 16,261; the Navy Reserve, 10,159; the Marine Corps Reserve, 

2,261; the Air National Guard of the United States, 14,734; and the 

Air Force Reserve, 2,911. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 412). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

End strength levels for reserves on active duty in support of the 

reserves for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2013 

Authorized 

FY 2014 Change from 

Request Recommenda- tion 

FY 2014 

Request 

FY 2013 

Authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 32,060 32,060 32,060 0 0 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 16,277 16,261 16,261 0 ¥16 

Navy Reserve ......................................................... 10,114 10,159 10,159 0 45 

Marine Corps Reserve ........................................... 2,261 2,261 2,261 0 0 

Air National Guard ................................................ 14,765 14,734 14,734 0 ¥31 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 2,888 2,911 2,911 0 23 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
552 

Service FY 2013 

Authorized 

FY 2014 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2014 

Request 

FY 2013 

Authorized 

DOD Total ..................................................... 78,365 78,386 78,386 0 21 

End strengths for military technicians (dual status) (sec. 413) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 413) that would authorize the following end strengths for military technicians (dual 

status) as of September 30, 2014: the Army National Guard of the 

United States, 27,210; the Army Reserve, 8,395; the Air National 

Guard of the United States, 21,875; and the Air Force Reserve, 

10,429. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 413). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

End strength levels for military technicians (dual status) for fiscal year 2014 are set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2013 

Authorized 

FY 2014 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2014 

Request 

FY 2013 

Authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 27,210 27,210 27,210 0 0 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 8,395 8,395 8,395 0 0 

Air National Guard ................................................ 22,180 21,875 21,875 0 ¥305 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 10,400 10,429 10,429 0 29 

DOD Total ..................................................... 68,185 67,909 67,909 0 ¥276 

Fiscal year 2014 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians (sec. 414) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 414) that would establish the following personnel limits for the reserve components of 

the Army and Air Force for non-dual status technicians as of September 30, 2014: the Army National Guard of the United States, 

1,600; the Air National Guard of the United States, 350; the Army 

Reserve, 595; and the Air Force Reserve, 90. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 414). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Personnel limitations for non-dual status technicians for fiscal 

year 2014 are set forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2013 

Authorized 

FY 2014 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2014 

Request 

FY 2013 

Authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 1,600 1,600 1,600 0 0 

Air National Guard ................................................ 350 350 350 0 0 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 595 595 595 0 0 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 90 90 90 0 0 

DOD Total ..................................................... 2,635 2,635 2,635 0 0 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
553 

Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active 

duty for operational support (sec. 415) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 415) that would authorize the maximum number of reserve component personnel who 

may be on active duty or full-time National Guard duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal year 2014 

to provide operational support. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 415). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

The maximum number of reserve component personnel who may 

be on active duty or full-time National Guard duty under section 

115(b) of title 10, United States Code, during fiscal year 2014 is set 

forth in the following table: 

Service FY 2013 

Authorized 

FY 2014 Change from 

Request Recommendation 

FY 2014 

Request 

FY 2013 

Authorized 

Army National Guard ............................................. 17,000 17,000 17,000 0 0 

Army Reserve ......................................................... 13,000 13,000 13,000 0 0 

Navy Reserve ......................................................... 6,200 6,200 6,200 0 0 

Marine Corps Reserve ........................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0 

Air National Guard ................................................ 16,000 16,000 16,000 0 0 

Air Force Reserve .................................................. 14,000 14,000 14,000 0 0 

DOD Total ..................................................... 69,200 69,200 69,200 0 0 

Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations 

Military personnel (sec. 421) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 421) that would authorize appropriations for military personnel at the levels identified 

in section 4401 of division D of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 421). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

TITLE V—MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY

Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy Generally 

Congressional notification requirements related to increases in number of general and flag officers on Active Duty or in joint duty 

assignments (sec. 501) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 501) that would amend 

sections 526 of title 10, United States Code, to reduce by 14 the 

total of the number of general and flag officers authorized to be on 

active duty in the military services, and by 10 the number of general and flag officers authorized to be assigned to joint duty assignments. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

526 of title 10, United States Code, to require the secretary of a 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
554 

military department to provide notice and rationale to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives whenever the secretary proposes to increase the number of 

general or flag officers above the lower of the statutory limit on the 

number of general or flag officers on active duty or the number of 

general or flag officers on active duty on January 1, 2014. The provision would also require the Secretary of Defense, the secretary of 

a military department, or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 

to provide notice and rationale to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives whenever the 

secretary or Chairman proposes to increase the number of general 

or flag officers above the lower of the statutory limit of general or 

flag officers in joint duty assignments or the number of general or 

flag officers in joint duty assignments on January 1, 2014. The proposed increases will not take place until after the end of the 60- 

calendar day beginning on the date that notice is provided. The 

provision would also require the Secretary of Defense, beginning on 

March 1, 2015, to submit to the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and the House of Representatives an annual report on 

the number of general and flag officers on Active Duty and in joint 

duty assignments on January 1 of the year in which the report is 

submitted. 

Service credit for cyberspace experience or advanced education upon 

original appointment as a commissioned officer (sec. 502) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

501) that would authorize service secretaries to award constructive 

service credit upon original appointment as a commissioned officer 

for special experience or training in certain cyberspace-related 

fields and for periods of advanced education in certain cyberspacerelated fields beyond the baccalaureate degree level. Constructive 

service credited under this provision is limited to 1 year for each 

year of special experience, training or advanced education, and 3 

years total of constructive service credit. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Selective early retirement authority for regular officers and selective 

early removal of officers from reserve active-status list (sec. 503) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 512) that would amend 

section 14704 of title 10, United States Code, to require service secretaries to submit to selection boards considering officers for selective early removal from the reserve active-status list a list of reserve component officers that includes the name of each officer on 

the reserve active-status list in the same grade and competitive 

category in the zone of consideration except for officers who have 

been approved for voluntary retirement or who will be involuntarily retired. The provision would also require service secretaries 

to specify the number of officers that a selection board may recommend for removal from the reserve active-status list. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 506). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment and would also amend section 638a(b)(2) of title 10, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
555 

United States Code, to authorize consideration for selective early 

retirement of: (1) officers in the regular grade of lieutenant colonel 

or commander who have failed to be selected for promotion at least 

one time, and (2) officers in the grade of colonel, or in the case of 

the Navy, captain, who have served on active duty in that grade 

for at least 2 years and whose names are not on a list of officers 

recommended for promotion. 

Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management 

Suicide prevention efforts for members of the reserve components 

(sec. 511) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 726) that would require the Secretary of Defense to share with any adjutant general 

of a state the contact information of members of the Individual 

Ready Reserve and individual mobilization augmentees who reside 

in the state of such adjutant general for the purpose of conducting 

suicide prevention outreach efforts. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would amend section 10219 of title 10, United States Code, to 

authorize the Secretary of Defense to share with the adjutant general of a state, upon request, the contact information of members 

of the Individual Ready Reserve and individual mobilization 

augmentees in order for the adjutant general to include those members in suicide prevention efforts. The amendment would also 

amend section 706 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to authorize education and 

outreach for suicide prevention in the existing pilot program on enhancements of Department of Defense efforts on mental health in 

the National Guard and reserves through community partnerships. 

Removal of restrictions on the transfer of officers between the active 

and inactive National Guard (sec. 512) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 513) that would provide temporary authority for the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Air Force to maintain an active status and an inactive 

status list of members in the inactive National Guard. The provision would also authorize the transfer of officers of the Army and 

Air National Guard from the Selected Reserve to the inactive National Guard and from the inactive National Guard to the Selected 

Reserve. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

507) that would authorize the transfer of officers of the Army and 

Air National Guard from the Selected Reserve to the inactive National Guard and from the inactive National Guard to the Selected 

Reserve during the period ending on December 31, 2016. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
556 

Limitations on cancellations of deployment of certain reserve component units and involuntary mobilizations of certain Reserves 

(sec. 513) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 511) that would require the service secretaries to provide at least 120 days advance 

notice to reserve component units, and individuals not part of a 

unit, prior to an order to active duty for deployment in connection 

with a contingency operation, and 120 days advance notice to such 

units if their deployments are canceled, postponed, or altered. In 

the event such notice was not provided, the provision would require 

the Secretary concerned to report to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives explaining 

the reasons for such failure. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

508) that would require the Secretary of Defense to personally approve of any decision to cancel the deployment of a reserve component unit within 180 days of its scheduled deployment date when 

an active-duty unit would be sent instead to perform the same mission, and to notify the congressional defense committees and governors concerned whenever such a decision is made. The agreement 

includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would add 

the requirement for the service secretaries to provide at least 120 

days advance notice of an involuntary mobilization of a member of 

a reserve component who is not assigned to a unit or who is to be 

mobilized apart from the member’s unit. This requirement would 

apply to individual members mobilized on or after the date that is 

120 days after the date of enactment of this Act and would sunset 

on the date of the completion of the withdrawal of United States 

combat forces from Afghanistan. 

Review of requirements and authorizations for reserve component 

general and flag officers in an active status (sec. 514) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 514) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the general 

officer and flag officer requirements for members of the reserve 

component in an active status, and to submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives containing the results of the review not later than 18 

months after the date of enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (sec. 515) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 515) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study to determine the 

feasibility of establishing a unit of the National Guard in American 

Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
557 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to report on the feasibility of establishing a unit 

of the National Guard in American Samoa and in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

Subtitle C—General Service Authorities 

Provision of information under Transition Assistance Program 

about disability-related employment and education protections 

(sec. 521) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 524) that would expand the training required under the transition assistance program 

to include information about disability-related employment and 

education protections available to service members and information 

on eligibility for certain education assistance programs administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. The provision would 

also require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report to 

the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committees on Armed 

Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate assessing 

the feasibility of providing certain transition assistance program instruction at overseas locations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would expand transition assistance program training to include information on disability-related employment and education 

protections, but would strike the rest of section 524 of the House 

bill. 

Medical examination requirements regarding post-traumatic stress 

disorder or traumatic brain injury before administrative separation (sec. 522) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 528) that would amend 

section 1177 of title 10, United States Code, to remove the exception for proceedings under the Uniform Code of Military Justice 

from the requirement for a medical examination of certain members diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic 

brain injury, or who otherwise reasonably alleges the influence of 

such a condition. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

1177 of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that an administrative separation in lieu of court-martial is an administrative separation within the meaning of this statute. 

Establishment and use of consistent definition of gender-neutral occupational standard for military career designators (sec. 523) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 526) that would amend 

section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160) to establish a consistent definition 

of ‘‘gender-neutral occupational standard’’ for use pursuant to the 

requirements of that section. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
558 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Sense of Congress regarding the Women in Service Implementation 

Plan (sec. 524) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530D) that would express the sense of the Congress that no later than September 2015 

the service secretaries should develop, review, and validate individual occupational standards to assess and assign members of the 

armed forces to units, including special operation forces, and that 

they should complete all assessments relating to the women in 

service implementation review by January 1, 2016. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Provision of military service records to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format (sec. 525) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 597) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs, to make specified records of each member of 

the armed forces who was discharged or released from the armed 

forces on or after September 11, 2001, available to the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require that the 

specified records of service members discharged or released from 

the armed forces on or after January 1, 2014, be made available 

to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs in an electronic format. 

Review of Integrated Disability Evaluation System (sec. 526) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 521) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the backlog 

of pending reserve component cases in the Integrated Disability 

Evaluation System (IDES) and provide a description of the 

progress being made to improve the tracking and visibility of pending cases by both active duty and reserve component members during each phase or step of the IDES. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, to conduct a review of the backlog of pending reserve component cases in the IDES and provide 

a description of the progress being made to improve the tracking 

and visibility of pending cases by both active duty and reserve component members during each phase or step of the IDES, to include 

when a military treatment facility is assigned a packet and pending case for action regarding a service member and when a packet 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
559 

is at the Veterans Tracking Application and Disability Rating Activity Site of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Subtitle D—Military Justice Matters, Other Than Sexual Assault 

Prevention and Response and Related Reforms 

Modification of eligibility for appointment as judge on the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (sec. 531) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

561) that would amend Article 142 of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (section 942 of title 10, United States Code) to authorize appointment of former commissioned officers of a regular component 

of an armed force as judges on the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Armed Forces. However, these former officers could not be 

appointed as a judge of the court within 7 years after relief from 

active duty. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would amend Article 

142 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (section 942 of title 10, 

United States Code) to provide that a person may not be appointed 

as a judge of the court within seven years after retirement from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an 

armed force. 

Enhancement of protection of rights of conscience of members of the 

Armed Forces and chaplains of such members (sec. 532) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530) that would amend 

section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) (‘‘section 533’’) to expand the required accommodation of the moral and religious beliefs of service 

members to include actions and speech, and would limit disciplinary and administrative action to those beliefs, actions, and speech 

that cause actual harm to good order and discipline. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

512) that would amend section 533 to require the accommodation 

of individual expressions of belief by service members unless such 

expressions of belief could have an adverse impact on military 

readiness, unit cohesion, and good order and discipline. The Senate 

provision would also require that regulations implementing section 

533 be prescribed within 120 days of enactment of this Act. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the regulations implementing section 533 

be prescribed within 90 days of the date of enactment of this Act. 

Inspector General investigation of Armed Forces compliance with 

regulations for the protection of rights of conscience of members 

of the Armed Forces and their chaplains (sec. 533) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

513) that would require the Department of Defense Inspector General (DOD IG) to assess and report to the congressional defense 

committees on the compliance of the Department of Defense with 

regulations promulgated under section 533 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), within 180 days of promulgation. The provision would also require the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
560 

DOD IG to investigate the Department’s and the services’ compliance with those regulations with respect to adverse personnel actions within 18 months of promulgating the regulations. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would strike the first report required within 180 days 

of the regulatory promulgation. 

Survey of military chaplains views on Department of Defense policy 

regarding chaplain prayers outside of religious services (sec. 

534) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 529) that would amend 

sections 3547, 4337, 6031, 8547, and 9337 of title 10, United States 

Code, to provide that a chaplain, if called upon to lead a prayer 

outside of a religious service, had the prerogative to close such 

prayer according to the traditions, expressions, and religious exercises of that chaplain’s endorsing faith group. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a survey of military chaplains to assess whether restrictions placed on prayers offered in public or 

non-religious settings have prevented them from exercising the tenets of their faith as prescribed by their endorsing faith group, and 

whether those restrictions have had an adverse impact on their 

ability to fulfill their duties to minister to members of the armed 

forces and their families. 

Subtitle E—Member Education and Training 

Additional requirements for approval of educational programs for 

purposes of certain educational assistance under laws administered by the Secretary of Defense (sec. 541) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 567) that would place 

limitations on when educational assistance may be used to pursue 

civilian certifications and licenses, and would authorize the use of 

various educational assistance benefits under the administration of 

the Secretary of Defense to pursue civilian certifications and licenses. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

524) that would establish a new section 2006a of title 10, United 

States Code, to require that educational institutions participating 

in certain Department of Defense education assistance programs 

enter into and comply with program participation agreements 

under title IV of the Higher Education Act, and to meet certain 

other standards. The provision would authorize the Secretary of 

Defense to waive these requirements in certain cases. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would modify the conditions under which the Secretary 

may authorize education assistance for programs that do not meet 

the standards specified in the provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
561 

Enhancement of mechanisms to correlate skills and training for 

military occupational specialties with skills and training required for civilian certifications and licenses (sec. 542) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 566) that would require the service secretaries to make information on civilian 

credentialing opportunities available to members of the armed 

forces during all stages of their military occupational specialty 

training. The provision would also require the service secretaries to 

provide information on military course training curricula, syllabi, 

and materials, levels of military advancement attained, and professional skills developed by service members, to civilian credentialing 

agencies, for the purposes of the administration of education benefits under the purview of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 525) that would require the information on course materials, 

levels of military advancement attained, and professional skills to 

be provided to entities approved by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or by state approving agencies, in addition to civilian 

credentialing agencies. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Report on the Troops to Teachers program (sec. 543) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 570) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not 

later than March 1, 2014, a report on the Troops to Teachers program that includes an evaluation of whether: (1) there is a need 

to broaden eligibility to allow service members and veterans without a bachelor’s degree admission into the program and whether 

the program can be strengthened, and (2) a pilot program should 

be established to demonstrate the potential benefit of an institution-based award for troops to teachers. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

527) that would express the sense of the Senate to strongly urge 

the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the Troops to Teachers program is a priority of the Nation’s commitment to the higher education of members of the armed forces, and to provide funds to the 

Troops to Teachers program in order to help separating members 

of the armed forces and veterans who wish to transition into a 

teaching career. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Secretary of Defense report on feasibility of requiring automatic operation of current prohibition on accrual of interest on direct 

student loans of certain members of the Armed Forces (sec. 544) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 570A) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress within 90 days assessing the feasibility of automatically applying the 

prohibition on accrual of interest on student loans for certain deployed service members, and how the Department would implement such automatic application. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
562 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

to require the report within 180 days after the date of enactment 

of this Act. 

Subtitle F—Defense Dependents’ Education and Military Family 

Readiness Matters 

Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that 

benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees (sec. 551) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 571) that would authorize $20.0 million for continuation of the Department of Defense 

(DOD) assistance program to local educational agencies (LEAs) 

that are impacted by the enrollment of dependent children of military members and DOD civilian employees. The provision would 

also authorize $5.0 million for assistance to LEAs with significant 

changes in enrollment of school-aged dependents of military members and civilian employees due to base closures, force structure 

changes, or force relocations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

571) that would authorize $25.0 million for the assistance program 

to LEAs impacted by the enrollment of dependent children of military members and civilian employees. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Impact aid for children with severe disabilities (sec. 552) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

572) that would authorize $5.0 million in defense-wide operation 

and maintenance for impact aid payments for children with disabilities under section 8003(d) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(d)), using the formula set forth 

in section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106–398), for continuation of Department of Defense assistance to local educational 

agencies that benefit eligible dependents with severe disabilities. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Treatment of tuition payments received for virtual elementary and 

secondary education component of Department of Defense education program (sec. 553) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 573) that would amend 

section 2164(l) of title 10, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of Defense to retain the tuition payments made by participants in the Department of Defense virtual elementary and secondary education programs. The retained tuition would be used to 

provide support for the virtual education programs authorized by 

section 2164(l). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
563 

Family support programs for immediate family members of members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces 

(sec. 554) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 554) that would authorize the Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, to conduct up to three pilot programs to assess the feasibility and benefits of providing family support activities for the immediate family 

members of the armed forces assigned to special operations forces. 

The provision would require that family support programs provided 

under the pilot not duplicate those family support programs being 

provided by the secretary of a military department. The provision 

would limit authorization for any program conducted under the 

pilot to fiscal years 2014 through 2016, and limit to $5.0 million 

the amount that may be spent on the pilot programs in a fiscal 

year. The provision would also require the Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command, to provide a report to the congressional 

defense committees within 180 days of the completion of a program 

conducted under this pilot. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would authorize the Commander, U.S. Special Operations 

Command, to conduct up to three pilot programs to assess the feasibility and benefits of providing family support activities for the 

immediate family members of the armed forces assigned to special 

operations forces. In selecting and conducting any pilot program, 

the Commander would be required to coordinate with the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. The amendment 

would require that family support programs provided under the 

pilot not duplicate those family support programs being provided 

by the secretary of a military department. The amendment would 

limit authorization for any program conducted under the pilot to 

fiscal years 2014 through 2016, and limit to $5.0 million the 

amount that may be spent on the pilot programs in a fiscal year. 

The amendment would also require the Commander, U.S. Special 

Operations Command, in coordination with the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Personnel and Readiness, to provide a detailed report 

to the congressional defense committees within 180 days of the 

completion of a program conducted under this pilot. 

Sense of Congress on parental rights of members of the armed forces 

in child custody determinations (sec. 555) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 552) that would amend 

title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 

et seq.) to provide that if a court renders a temporary custody order 

based solely on the deployment or anticipated deployment of a service member, the court shall require the reinstatement of the prior 

custody order upon the return of the service member from deployment, unless the court finds that reinstatement is not in the best 

interest of the child. The provision would also prohibit a court from 

considering the absence of a servicemember by reason of deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole factor in determining the best interest of a child. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
564 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1053) that would express the sense of the Senate that State courts 

should not consider military deployment as the sole factor in determining child custody in a State court proceeding involving a parent 

who is a member of the armed forces. The best interest of the child 

should always prevail in custody cases, but members of the armed 

forces should not lose custody of their children based solely upon 

service to our country. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would make it a sense of Congress. 

Subtitle G—Decorations and Awards 

Repeal of limitation on number of Medals of Honor that may be 

awarded to the same member of the Armed Forces (sec. 561) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 582) that would amend 

sections 3744, 6247, and 8744 of title 10, United States Code, to 

authorize the award of more than one Medal of Honor to a person 

whose subsequent acts justify an additional award. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 581(a)). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Standardization of time-limits for recommending and awarding 

Medal of Honor, Distinguished-Service Cross, Navy Cross, Air 

Force Cross, and Distinguished-Service Medal (sec. 562) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 583) that would amend 

sections 3744 and 8744 of title 10, United States Code, to require 

that recommendations for the award of the Medal of Honor, Distinguished Service Cross, Air Force Cross, or Distinguished Service 

Medal for members of the Army and Air Force be made within 3 

years and that the award be made within 5 years after the date 

of the act justifying the award. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 581(b)). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Recodification and revision of Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast 

Guard Medal of Honor roll requirements (sec. 563) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 584) that would amend 

chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to establish a roll designated as the ‘‘Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard Medal of 

Honor Roll’’ and require the service secretaries to record on this 

roll the name of each person who has been awarded a Medal of 

Honor. The provision would also amend section 1562 of title 38, 

United States Code, to provide for the automatic enrollment and 

payment of the special pension to living Medal of Honor recipients. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 582). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Prompt replacement of military decorations (sec. 564) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590B) that would 

amend section 1135 of title 10, United States Code, to require servVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00596 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
565 

ice secretaries, upon receipt of a request for the replacement of a 

military decoration, to ensure that: (1) all actions to be taken with 

respect to the request, including verification of the service record 

of the recipient of the military decoration, are completed within one 

year; and (2) the replacement military decoration is mailed to the 

person requesting the replacement military decoration within 60 

days after the verification of the service record. The provision 

would also require an annual report on compliance with this requirement 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require mailing of the replacement military decoration 

within 90 days of verification of the service record and that would 

delete the requirement for an annual report. 

Review of eligibility for, and award of, Purple Heart to victims of 

the attacks at recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, and 

at Fort Hood, Texas (sec. 565) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 585) that would require the award of the Purple Heart to the victims of the attacks 

that occurred at the recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas on 

June 1, 2009, and at Fort Hood, Texas on November 5, 2009. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the service secretary concerned to review the circumstances of and available evidence pertaining to the attacks at the recruiting station in 

Little Rock, Arkansas, and at Fort Hood, Texas; to award the Purple Heart to victims of those attacks determined pursuant to that 

review to be eligible for the award; and to report to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

within 180 days of the date of enactment of this Act on the results 

of that review. The included provision would also require the Secretary of Defense to review the eligibility criteria for the Purple 

Heart to establish the actions or conditions for which the Purple 

Heart shall be awarded to a member of an armed force who has 

been wounded in such action. The included provision would require 

the Secretary to report to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House of Representatives within 180 days of the 

date of enactment of this Act on the results of that review, including any recommendations for change to the Purple Heart criteria 

the Secretary considers appropriate. 

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to former members 

of the Armed Forces previously recommended for award of the 

Medal of Honor (sec. 566) 

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

552(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2002 (Public Law 107–107), to authorize the award of the Medal 

of Honor to veterans of the armed forces who, although they were 

not Jewish-American or Hispanic-American war veterans, were recommended for award of the Medal of Honor as a result of the reVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00597 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
566 

quired review of service records of certain Jewish-American war 

veterans and Hispanic-American war veterans. 

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor for acts of valor during the Vietnam War (sec. 567) 

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the 

President to award the Medal of Honor to Sergeant First Class 

Bennie G. Adkins, United States Army, and to Specialist Four Donald P. Sloat, United States Army, for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. 

Authorization for award of the Distinguished Service Cross for acts 

of valor during the Korean and Vietnam Wars (sec. 568) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 588) that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished Service Cross to Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor 

during the Korean War. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 583) and a provision (sec. 584) that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished Service Cross to 

Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., for acts of valor during the Vietnam War. 

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the 

Secretary of the Army to award the Distinguished Service Cross to 

Sergeant First Class Robert F. Keiser for acts of valor during the 

Korean War; to Patrick N. Watkins, Jr., for acts of valor during the 

Vietnam War; and to Specialist Four Robert L. Towles for acts of 

valor during the Vietnam War. 

Authorization for award of the Medal of Honor to First Lieutenant 

Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil War (sec. 

569) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590C) that would authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor to then First 

Lieutenant Alonzo H. Cushing for acts of valor during the Civil 

War, effective upon receipt by the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives of a report providing information on the process and materials used by review 

boards for the consideration of Medal of Honor recommendations 

for acts of heroism that occurred during the Civil War. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would remove the requirement for receipt of the report as the 

report has already been received by the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. 

Subtitle H—Other Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Report on feasibility of expanding performance evaluation reports to 

include 360-degree assessment approach (sec. 571) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 563) that would require service secretaries to develop an assessment program modeled after the current Department of the Army Multi-Source Assessment and Feedback Program, known as the ‘‘360-degree apVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00598 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
567 

proach,’’ and would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to 

Congress, not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this 

Act, a report containing the results of an assessment of the feasibility of including the 360-degree approach as part of the performance evaluation reports. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on Armed Services 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives, not later than 180 

days after the date of enactment of this Act, a report containing the 

results of an assessment of the feasibility of including a 360-degree 

assessment approach as part of performance evaluation reports. 

Report on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members of the Armed Forces with HIV or Hepatitis B (sec. 572) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550F) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on 

the use of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Manual for 

Courts-Martial, and related policies, punitive articles, and regulations with regard to service members living with or at risk of contracting HIV. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit, not later than 180 days after the date 

of enactment of this Act, a report to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on Department of Defense personnel policies regarding members of the 

armed forces infected with human immunodeficiency virus or Hepatitis B. The report shall include an assessment of whether the 

policies reflect an evidence-based, medically accurate understanding of how these conditions are contracted, how they can be 

transmitted to others, and the risk of transmission. 

Policy on military recruitment and enlistment of graduates of secondary schools (sec. 573) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530G) that would require the Secretary of Defense to implement a means for ensuring 

that graduates of a secondary school, including graduates who receive diplomas from secondary schools that are legally operating or 

who otherwise complete a program of secondary education in compliance with state law, are required to meet the same standard of 

any test, assessment, or screening tool used to identify persons for 

recruitment and enlistment in the armed forces. 

The Senate committee-passed bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Comptroller General report on use of determination of personality 

disorder or adjustment disorder as basis to separate members 

from the Armed Forces (sec. 574) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530H) that would require the Comptroller General of the United States, not later than 

180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, to submit to the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
568 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a report evaluating: (1) the use by the secretaries 

of the military departments, since January 1, 2007, of the authority 

to separate members due to unfitness for duty because of a mental 

condition not amounting to disability, including separation on the 

basis of a personality disorder or adjustment disorder and the number of members separated on such basis; (2) the extent to which the 

secretaries failed to comply with regulatory requirements in separating members of the armed forces on the basis of a personality 

or adjustment disorder; and (3) the impact of such a separation on 

the ability of veterans so separated to access service-connected disability compensation, disability severance pay, and disability retirement pay. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Comptroller General to submit the report to 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives not later than one year after the date of enactment 

of this Act. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Accounting for members of the armed forces and Department of Defense civilian employees listed as missing and related reports 

(sec. 581) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

591) that would amend section 1501 of title 10, United States Code, 

to require the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Prisoner 

of War/Missing Personnel Affairs to conduct periodic briefings for 

families of missing persons on Department activities to account for 

those persons. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense 

for Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Affairs to disseminate appropriate information on the status of missing persons to authorized family members. The provision would also require the Secretary of Defense, by no later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, to submit a report to the appropriate committees 

of the Senate and the House of Representatives detailing certain 

statistical data relative to the recovery of remains of missing service members from various conflicts, including those that remain 

missing, and a report assessing the organization of the prisoner of 

war/missing in action accounting community, including command 

and control over its constituent elements, whether certain of those 

elements should be reorganized, moved, or consolidated, and how 

the Secretary will ensure greater oversight of the community. 

Expansion of privileged information authorities to debriefing reports 

of certain recovered persons who were never placed in a missing 

status (sec. 582) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

592) that would amend sections 1506 and 1513 of title 10, United 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
569 

States Code, to include as privileged information, for the purposes 

of personnel files maintained under the system for accounting for 

missing persons, any survival, evasion, resistance, and escape debriefing reports by certain persons returned to United States control under a promise of confidentiality. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Revision of specified senior military colleges to reflect consolidation 

of North Georgia College and State University and Gainesville 

State College (sec. 583) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 591) that would amend 

section 2111a(f) of title 10, United States Code, to reflect the name 

change of North Georgia College and State University to The University of North Georgia. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 528). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Review of security of military installations, including barracks, temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family residences (sec. 584) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 565) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of security 

measures on military installations, specifically with regard to barracks and multi-family housing units on military installations, for 

the purpose of ensuring the safety of members of the armed forces 

and their dependents who reside on military installations, and to 

submit a report containing the results of the review to Congress 

not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of security measures on military installations, specifically with regard to access to barracks, 

temporary lodging facilities, and multi-family housing units on 

military installations, for the purpose of ensuring the safety of 

members of the armed forces and their dependents who reside on 

military installations, and to submit a report containing the results 

of the review to Congress not later than 180 days after the date 

of enactment of this Act. 

We intend for the Secretary’s review to consider a wide range of 

access and security issues, including but not limited to issues regarding sexual assault prevention and response. We expect the Secretary to take into consideration the findings of the three reviews 

of security measures at U.S. military installations worldwide by 

the Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, and the 

independent panel following the shooting at the Washington Navy 

Yard. 

Authority to enter into concessions contracts at Army National Military Cemeteries (sec. 585) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 592) that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to enter into concession contracts 

for transportation, interpretative, and other services in support of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
570 

visitors at Arlington National Cemetery and the United States Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery. This section would 

also require that each concession contract ensure the protection, 

dignity, and solemnity of the cemetery at which services are provided. Furthermore, the section would prohibit the Secretary of the 

Army from instituting a concession contract for operation of the gift 

shop at Arlington National Cemetery without subsequent authorization. In providing for transportation services at Arlington National Cemetery, the provision directs the Secretary of the Army to 

ensure that service provides visitors with access to the Custis Lee 

Mansion. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a technical amendment. 

Military salute during recitation of pledge of allegiance by members 

of the Armed Forces not in uniform and by veterans (sec. 586) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 596) that would amend 

section 4 of title 4, United States Code, to authorize members of 

the armed forces not in uniform and veterans to render the military salute in the manner provided for persons in uniform. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Improved climate assessments and dissemination of results (sec. 

587) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 562) that would direct 

the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the results of command climate assessments are provided to the relevant individual commander and to the next higher level of command; require service 

secretaries to include in the performance evaluation of commanders 

a designated form where senior commanders can indicate whether 

the commander has conducted the required climate assessments; 

require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to develop a system to track whether commanders are conducting command climate assessments; and require unit commanders to develop a compliance report that includes a comprehensive overview 

of the concerns that unit members expressed in climate assessments, data showing how leadership is perceived in the unit, and 

a detailed strategic plan on how leadership plans to address the expressed concerns. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the results of command climate assessments are provided to the relevant 

individual commander and to the next higher level of command; require service secretaries to include in the performance evaluation 

of commanders a statement by the commander regarding whether 

the commander has conducted the required command climate assessments; and require that the failure of a commander to conduct 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
571 

the required command climate assessments be noted in the commander’s performance evaluation. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Designation of state student cadet corps as Department of Defense 

youth organizations 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 516) that would amend 

section 508(d) of title 32, United States Code, to add to the list of 

youth and charitable organizations eligible to receive certain services from the National Guard any state student cadet corps authorized under state law. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

509) that would amend section 509 of title 32, United States Code, 

to require the Secretary of Defense to use the National Guard to 

conduct the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program, and require the Chief of the National Guard Bureau to conduct the program in such states as the Chief considers appropriate, to prescribe 

the standards and procedures for selecting program participants, 

and to submit a report to Congress annually on the program. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

Authority for joint professional military education phase II instruction and credit to be offered and awarded through senior-level 

course of School of Advanced Military Studies of the United 

States Army Command and General Staff College 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

521) that would amend section 2151(b) of title 10, United States 

Code, to authorize the School of Advanced Military Studies seniorlevel course at the Army Command and General Staff College to 

offer joint professional military education (JPME) phase II instruction and credit. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the conference report to accompany the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239) recommended that JPME II credit for participation in the senior-level course of the School of Advanced Military Studies of the 

United States Army Command and General Staff College be awarded through the Army War College. This is a senior service college 

level course and attendance is determined through the selection 

process for Senior Service College. We direct the Army to work 

with the Middle States Commission on Higher Learning to designate the School of Advanced Military Studies to be an additional 

location of study for the U.S. Army War College in order to award 

JPME II credit to students who successfully complete this course. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
572 

Authority for Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences 

to support undergraduate and other medical education and 

training programs for military medical personnel 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

522) that would amend sections 2112(a) and 2113 of title 10, 

United States Code, to provide greater flexibility to the Secretary 

of Defense, through the Uniformed Services University of the 

Health Sciences (USUHS), to access federal resources outside of the 

National Capital Region and to enable the USUHS to grant undergraduate degrees, certificates, and certifications in addition to advanced degrees. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We believe that further analysis and review of the authorities 

and support that may be necessary to allow the Medical Education 

and Training Campus (METC), the tri-service medical training center in San Antonio, Texas, to upgrade its health education programs is required. We understand that the Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Health Affairs has established a working group to address several of these issues. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense to expand this working group 

to include the Director of Training Readiness and Strategy of the 

Department of Defense, and other appropriate representatives outside of the health communities that may be impacted, to develop 

a consensus on a way forward that meets the needs of the services 

and the service members in a cost-efficient manner. We will await 

the results of such a consensus before considering expanding authorities to various organizations to support the METC. 

Command responsibility and accountability for remains of members 

of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps who die outside the United States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 523) that would require the Secretary of Defense, within 60 days of enactment of this 

Act, to take such steps as necessary to ensure that there is continuous, designated military command responsibility and accountability for the care, handling, and transportation of the remains of 

each deceased member of the armed services who dies outside the 

United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We expect the Department of Defense and the military services 

to ensure the effective exercise of command oversight over the process of returning the remains of service members to their families. 

Expansion of eligibility for associate degree programs under the 

Community College of the Air Force 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

523) that would amend section 9315(b) of title 10, United States 

Code, to authorize the Community College of the Air Force to 

award associate degrees to enlisted members of armed forces other 

than the Air Force who participate in joint-service medical training 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
573 

and education or instructors in such joint-service medical training 

and education. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We believe that further analysis and review of the authorities 

and support is required before the Medical Education and Training 

Campus (METC), the tri-Service medical training center in San Antonio, Texas, upgrades its health education programs. We understand that the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs 

has established a working group to address several of these issues. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense to expand the working group 

to include representatives from the Department’s Office of Transition Assistance and other appropriate representatives outside of 

the health communities that may be impacted to develop a plan 

that meets the needs of the Services and the service members in 

a cost-efficient manner. We will await the completion of the plan 

before authorizing additional authorities for the various organizations that support the METC. 

Procedures for judicial review of military personnel decisions relating to correction of military records 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 525) that would amend 

chapter 79 and sections 1034 and 1552 of title 10, United States 

Code, to revise procedures for judicial review of final military personnel decisions relating to correction of military records. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Coverage of military occupational specialties relating to military information technology under pilot program on receipt of civilian 

credentials for skills required for military occupational specialties 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

526) that would require that the military occupational specialties 

designated for the purposes of the pilot program on receipt of civilian credentials authorized by section 558 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) include 

those specialties relating to the military information technology 

workforce. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Report on data and information collected in connection with Department of Defense review of laws, policies, and regulations restricting service of female members of the Armed Forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530C) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide the Committees on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 

report containing the specific results and data produced during the 

research programs, tests, surveys, consultant reports, assessments, 

and similar projects conducted in support of the requirement in 

section 535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) to review laws, policies, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
574 

and regulations restricting the service of female members of the 

armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the Department of Defense has provided the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives RAND’s 2012 technical report entitled ‘‘A New Look at 

Gender and Minority Differences in Officer Career Progression in 

the Military’’ prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense as 

part of the review required by section 535 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011. 

Meetings with respect to religious liberty 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530E) that would require the Department of Defense to provide to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives advance written notice of any meeting held between Department employees and civilians for the purpose of writing, revising, implementing, enforcing, or seeking advice, input, or counsel regarding 

military policy related to religious liberty. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We believe the Department and the military services should 

proactively reach out to and meet with religious groups of all faiths 

when formulating and revising policies that impact religious freedom and tolerance within the military. We are becoming increasingly concerned over reports that the Department and the services 

appear more responsive to some religious groups and interests than 

others. The Department and the services must be proactive in their 

efforts to overcome this perception and to ensure the fairness and 

equity of policies and regulations that address the religious liberty 

of service members and their families. 

Proof of period of military service for purposes of interest rate limitation under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530F) that would 

amend section 207 of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 

U.S.C. App. 527) to expand the ways in which a servicemember 

may prove a period of military service for the purposes of the interest rate limitation under that Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550C) that would establish the Military Hazing Prevention Oversight Panel to provide 

recommendations to the service secretaries on the development of 

policies, programs, and procedures to prevent and respond to hazing in the armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
575 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that section 534 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013, Public Law 112–239, required the Services, along with the Coast Guard, to review the treatment of hazing 

and report the results of the reviews to the appropriate congressional committees. As a result of the review, the Marine Corps revised its hazing policy on May 20, 2013, to prohibit all forms of 

hazing. The Army established a Hazing Policy Assessment Team to 

review all hazing cases from 2006 through 2013, and the Navy established the Office of Hazing Prevention. 

In addition, the Services are either tracking or in the process of 

tracking hazing incidents, and are continuing efforts to address 

prevention of hazing in their force. We understand that the Joint 

Service Committee on Military Justice recommended changes to 

specifically address hazing under the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (UCMJ). We expect the Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security for the Coast Guard, to continue to 

monitor this issue to ensure that the recommended changes to the 

UCMJ are implemented, and that all the Services have the ability 

to track hazing incidents within their Service. 

Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the 

Armed Forces who serve in combat zones 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 551) that would amend 

chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to require the design of 

a spouse-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, approved by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize the spouse of a member 

of the armed forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone 

for a period of more than 30 days. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that section 901(b) of title 36, United States Code, authorizes the wearing of a service lapel button approved by the Secretary of Defense by the immediate family of an individual serving 

in the armed forces of the United States during any period of war 

or hostilities in which the armed forces of the United States are engaged. 

Treatment of relocation of members of the Armed Forces for active 

duty for purposes of mortgage refinancing 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 553) that would amend 

the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et seq.) to 

authorize a service member to refinance a principal residence in 

circumstances where the service member was unable to continue 

residing in the residence by virtue of receiving permanent change 

of station orders, or when deployed or mobilized in support of a 

military operation for a period of at least 18 months. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
576 

Transition of members of the Armed Forces and their families from 

military to civilian life 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 555) that would express the sense of the Congress on the role of federal and State 

governments in ensuring a seamless transition back to civilian life 

for service members and their families. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We believe that members of the armed forces and their families 

make great sacrifices on behalf of the country, and their transition 

from military to civilian life should be as seamless as possible by 

providing them opportunities to earn civilian occupational credentials and licenses. State and local governments and industries 

should streamline methods for assessing the equivalency of military training and experience, and accelerate occupational and professional licensure and certifications for members and spouses. 

Further, we believe that private employers should, to the extent 

practicable, do their utmost to educate and inform their managers, 

supervisors, and human resource departments on the advantages of 

hiring qualified veterans who have service-connected permanent 

total disabilities, as well as qualified surviving spouses of service 

members killed in action. 

We note that the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) required the Department of Defense to carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of permitting enlisted members of the armed forces to obtain civilian credentialing or licensing for skills required for military occupational specialties or qualification for duty specialty 

codes. The Department recently successfully completed the initial 

phase which had selected five civilian occupations for the pilot, 

which included aircraft mechanics, automotive mechanics, 

healthcare support, logistics and supply, and truck drivers. These 

occupations were chosen because the labor market outlook projects 

medium to high wages, high employment, and significant growth 

for civilian jobs in these occupations. As a result of the initial results, the Department recommends continuing and expanding the 

pilot program, expanding credentialing opportunities to military occupational codes in law enforcement, and including greater participation by the reserve components as well as wounded, ill, or injured service members. 

Mortgage protection for members of the Armed Forces, surviving 

spouses, and certain veterans and other improvements to the 

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 556) that would amend 

the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 501 et seq.) to 

enhance mortgage protections under that Act for service members, 

surviving spouses, and certain veterans. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
577 

Department of Defense recognition of dependents of members of the 

Armed Forces who serve in combat zones 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 557) that would amend 

chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, to require the design of 

a dependent-of-a-combat-veteran lapel button, approved by the Secretary of Defense, to identify and recognize the dependent of a 

member of the armed forces who is serving or has served in a combat zone for a period of more than 30 days. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that section 901(b) of title 36, United States Code, authorizes the wearing of a service lapel button approved by the Secretary of Defense by the immediate family of an individual serving 

in the armed forces of the United States during any period of war 

or hostilities in which the armed forces of the United States are engaged. 

Inclusion of Freely Associated States within scope of Junior Reserve 

Officers’ Training Corps Program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 561) that would amend 

section 2031(a) of title 10, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of a military department to establish and maintain a 

unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps at a secondary 

education institution in the Freely Associated States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Requirement to continue provision of tuition assistance for members 

of the Armed Forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 568) that would require the service secretaries to fund tuition assistance programs at 

appropriated levels for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

Internet access for members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps serving in combat zones 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 569) that would require the secretaries of the military departments to ensure that 

members of the armed forces deployed in an area for which imminent danger pay or hazardous duty pay is authorized have reasonable access to the Internet. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Support for efforts to improve academic achievement and transition 

of military dependent students 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 572) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to make grants to non-profit organizations that provide services to improve the academic achieveVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00609 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
578 

ment of military dependent students, including those organizations 

whose programs focus on improving the civic responsibility of military dependent students and their understanding of the Federal 

Government through direct exposure to government operations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

Fraudulent representations about receipt of military decorations or 

medals 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 581) that would amend 

title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulently claiming to be 

a recipient of certain decorations or medals with the intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefits a crime. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that this provision has already been enacted in the Stolen Valor Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–12). 

Retroactive award of Army Combat Action Badge 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 586) that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to award the Army Combat Action Badge to a person who, while a member of the Army, participated in combat during which the person personally engaged, or 

was personally engaged by, the enemy at any time during the period beginning on December 7, 1941, and ending on September 18, 

2001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Report on Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal 

of Honor nomination of Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 587) that would require the Secretary of the Navy to submit a report on the Navy review, findings, and actions pertaining to the Medal of Honor nomination of Sergeant Rafael Peralta to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Required gold content for Medal of Honor 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 589) that would require the metal content of the Medal of Honor to be 90 percent gold 

and 10 percent alloy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Consideration of Silver Star Award nominations 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590) that would require the Secretary of the Army to consider the nominations for the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
579 

Silver Star Award, as previously submitted, for retired Master Sergeants Michael McElhiney, Ronnie Raikes, Gilbert Magallanes, and 

Staff Sergeant Wesley McGirr. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We are aware of the errors contained in the Valor Awards Database established by the Department of Defense in July 2012. These 

errors led to confusion regarding individuals whose names appear 

on the database as having earned a particular award for valor but 

have never received such award. We expect the Department of Defense and the military services to review their procedures for validating the information contained in the Valor Awards Database to 

eliminate the possibility of clerical errors in the future. 

Report on Army review, findings, and actions pertaining to Medal 

of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 590A) that would require the Secretary of the Army to submit to the Committee on 

Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report pertaining 

to the Medal of Honor nomination of Captain William L. Albracht. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Commission on Military Behavioral Health and Disciplinary Issues 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 593) that would establish a commission to study whether the Department of Defense 

mechanisms for disciplinary action adequately address the impact 

of service-connected mental disorders and traumatic brain injury 

on the basis for the disciplinary action. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Commission on Service to the Nation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 594) that would establish the Commission on Service to the Nation to study the effect 

of warfare on service members, their families, and their communities; the outgoing experience and transition between military and 

civilian life; and the gaps between the military and those Americans who do not participate directly in the military community. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 

the Comptroller General of the United States shall provide to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives a comprehensive listing of Department of Defense 

and Department of Veterans Affairs programs that address (1) the 

effect of warfare, focusing on recent wars and conflicts, on members 

of the armed forces, the families of members of the armed forces, 

and the communities of members of the armed forces; (2) the outgoing experience and transition between military and civilian life; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
580 

and (3) the gaps between the military and those Americans who do 

not participate directly in the military community. 

Sense of Congress regarding the recovery of the remains of certain 

members of the Armed Forces killed in Thurston Island, Antarctica 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 598) that would express the sense of Congress that the remains of service members 

killed at Thurston Island, Antarctica should be recovered and repatriated. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

TITLE VI—COMPENSATION AND OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS

Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances 

Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of 

basic allowance for housing under certain circumstances (sec. 

601) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 601) that would extend 

for 1 year the authority of the Secretary of Defense to temporarily 

increase the rate of basic allowance for housing in areas impacted 

by natural disasters or experiencing a sudden influx of personnel. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 603). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Recognition of additional means by which members of the National 

Guard called into Federal service for a period of 30 days or less 

may initially report for duty for entitlement to basic pay (sec. 

602) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 602) that would amend 

section 204(c) of title 37, United States Code, to provide additional 

means by which members of the National Guard called into federal 

service for a period of 30 days or less may become entitled to basic 

pay by including the date on which a member contacts their unit 

through authorized telephonic or electronic means. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

602) that would repeal section 204(c) of title 37, United States 

Code. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays 

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for 

reserve forces (sec. 611) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 611) that would extend 

for 1 year the authority to pay the Selected Reserve reenlistment 

bonus, the Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus, special 

pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units, 

the Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service, the Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for perVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00612 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
581 

sons with prior service, the Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service, reimbursement of 

travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance, and income replacement for reserve component 

members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 611). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for 

health care professionals (sec. 612) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 612) that would extend 

for 1 year the authority to pay the nurse officer candidate accession 

bonus, education loan repayment for certain health professionals 

who serve in the Selected Reserve, accession and retention bonuses 

for psychologists, the accession bonus for registered nurses, incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists, special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties, 

the accession bonus for dental officers, the accession bonus for 

pharmacy officers, the accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties, and the accession bonus for dental 

specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 612). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear 

officers (sec. 613) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 613) that would extend 

for 1 year the authority to pay the special pay for nuclear-qualified 

officers extending period of active service, the nuclear career accession bonus, and the nuclear career annual incentive bonus. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 613). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated 

special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities (sec. 614) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 614) that would extend 

for 1 year the general bonus authority for enlisted members, the 

general bonus authority for officers, special bonus and incentive 

pay authorities for nuclear officers, special aviation incentive pay 

and bonus authorities for officers, and special bonus and incentive 

pay authorities for officers in health professions. The provision 

would also extend for 1 year the authority to pay hazardous duty 

pay, assignment or special duty pay, skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus, and retention incentives for members qualified in 

critical military skills or assigned to high priority units. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 614). 

The agreement includes this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
582 

One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 

37 bonuses and special pays (sec. 615) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 615) that would extend 

for 1 year the authority to pay the aviation officer retention bonus, 

assignment incentive pay, the reenlistment bonus for active members, the enlistment bonus, the accession bonus for new officers in 

critical skills, the incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage, the incentive bonus for 

transfer between armed forces, and the accession bonus for officer 

candidates. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 615). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

One-year extension of authority to provide incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language 

proficiency (sec. 616) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 616) that would extend 

for 1 year the authority to provide incentive pay for members of 

precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Authority to provide bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (sec. 617) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 617) that would create 

a new section 336 in title 37, United States Code, to authorize a 

bonus to certain cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Health Professions Stipend Program to obtain commissioned officers 

in the reserve components (sec. 618) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

617) that would amend section 16201(d) of title 10, United States 

Code, to authorize payment of the health professions stipend to a 

nurse enrolled in an accredited program of nursing in a specialty 

designated as critical by the Secretary of Defense who is eligible for 

appointment as a Reserve officer in any of the reserve components. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require all individuals receiving stipends under 

the authority of section 16201 of title 10, United States Code, to 

agree to serve in the Selected Reserve for 1 year for each 6 months 

for which the stipend is provided. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
583 

Subtitle C—Travel and Transportation Allowances 

Technical and standardizing amendments to Department of Defense 

travel and transportation authorities in connection with reform 

of such authorities (sec. 621) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

631) that would amend sections 1040, 1074i, 1482, and 1491 of title 

10, United States Code, and sections 451 and 453 of title 37, 

United States Code, to make technical changes to those sections to 

conform with the travel consolidation reform enacted in sections 

631 and 632 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81). The provision would also repeal 

sections 1036, 1053a, and 2634 of title 10, United States Code, as 

superseded. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Subtitle D—Disability, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits 

Clarification of prevention of retired pay inversion in the case of 

members whose retired pay is computed using high-three (sec. 

631) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 622) that would make 

a technical amendment to section 1401a of title 10, United States 

Code, to clarify that certain provisions of subsection (f) of that section do not apply to the computation of retired pay of members who 

first entered active duty on or after September 8, 1980. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 641). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Periodic notice to members of the Ready Reserve on early retirement 

credit earned for significant periods of active Federal status or 

active duty (sec. 632) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 595) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish an electronic means by 

which members of the Ready Reserve could track qualifying service 

performed under section 12731(f)(2) of title 10, United States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

644) that would require the secretary concerned to periodically notify members of the Ready Reserve having performed qualifying 

duty under section 12731(f)(2) of title 10, United States Code, of 

their current eligibility age for retired pay by such means as the 

secretary concerned considers appropriate accounting for the cost of 

providing notice and the convenience of service members. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Improved assistance for Gold Star spouses and other dependents 

(sec. 633) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

643) that would amend sections 1450 and 1455 of title 10, United 

States Code, to authorize the payment of the Survivor Benefit Plan 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
584 

annuity to a special needs trust created under subparagraph (A) or 

(C) of section 1396p(d)(4) of title 42, United States Code, for the 

sole benefit of a disabled dependent child incapable of self-support 

because of mental or physical incapacity. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the service secretaries to designate a military member or civilian employee 

to provide certain assistance to spouses and other dependents of 

service members who die on active duty. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Health and Human 

Services, to assess the needs of Survivor Benefit Plan participants 

who have dependent children and spouses with special needs, and 

the feasibility and advisability of authorizing such participants to 

direct their annuity to a special needs trust for the benefit of the 

disabled child or spouse. The assessment should include a review 

of the number of dependents who would be potentially affected by 

such a change, the laws and regulations under which special needs 

trusts operate, and obstacles to efficient and transparent implementation of any such change, should the Secretary determine it 

is feasible and advisable. We direct the Secretary to submit the results of this review to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House of Representatives by no later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Subtitle E—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund 

Instrumentality Benefits and Operations 

Expansion of protection of employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities from reprisals (sec. 641) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 631) that would amend 

section 1587(b) of title 10, United States Code, to align protections 

from reprisals for employees of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities with protections from reprisals for other Department of Defense civilian personnel. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1103). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Modernization of titles of nonappropriated fund instrumentalities 

for purposes of certain civil service laws (sec. 642) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 633) that would amend 

section 2105(c) of title 5, United States Code, to remove the reference to Army and Air Force Motion Picture Service and Navy 

Ship’s Stores Ashore and replace it with the Navy Ships Stores 

Program in order to provide a more accurate and current definition 

of nonappropriated fund instrumentality employees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1108). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

amendment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
585 

Subtitle F—Other Matters 

Authority to provide certain expenses for care and disposition of 

human remains that were retained by the Department of Defense for forensic pathology investigation (sec. 651) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 641) that would authorize the payment of certain expenses for the care and disposition of human remains retained by a service secretary pursuant to 

a forensic pathology investigation by the Armed Forces Medical Examiner under section 1471 of title 10, United States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 671). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Study of the merits and feasibility of providing transitional compensation and other transitional benefits to dependents of members separated for violation of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (sec. 652) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 621) that would establish a new section 1059a of title 10, United States Code, to authorize a monthly transitional compensation benefit for dependents of 

service members with more than 20 years of service who are convicted by court-martial of an offense under the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice (UCMJ), and who, as a result of the sentence of 

the court-martial, are separated from active duty and forfeit all pay 

and allowances. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study regarding the merits and feasibility of providing transitional compensation benefits to dependents or former dependents of members of the armed forces who are 

convicted by court-martial under the UCMJ, and who, as a result 

of the sentence of the court-martial, are separated from active duty 

and forfeit all pays and allowances, and to report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the results of that study by no later than 180 days after 

the date of enactment of this Act. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Fiscal year 2014 increase in military basic pay 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

601) that would authorize an across-the-board pay raise for members of the uniformed services of 1 percent effective January 1, 

2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that on August 30, 2013, the President transmitted to 

Congress an alternative pay plan establishing an across-the-board 

pay increase of 1 percent for members of the uniformed services for 

calendar year 2014 rather than the 1.8 percent that would otherwise have taken effect under current law. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
586 

Correction of citation for extension of reimbursement authority for 

travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal 

commuting distance and additional one-year extension 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

616) that would correct an erroneous citation in section 611(7) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) that extended authority to pay travel expenses for 

certain inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distances. The provision would further extend the authority to December 31, 2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the technical correction contained in this section 

and further extension of authority appear elsewhere in this Act. 

Purchase of sustainable products, local food products, and recyclable materials for resale in commissary and exchange store systems 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 632) that would require the governing body providing oversight and management direction to the military exchange and commissary systems to establish guidelines for the identification of fresh meat, poultry, seafood, 

produce, and other products raised or produced through sustainable 

methods. The provision would also require the governing body to 

establish, not later than September 30, 2018, goals for all exchange 

and commissary stores to purchase sustainable products, local food 

products, and recyclable materials. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Exchange store system participation in the Accord on Fire and 

Building Safety in Bangladesh 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 634) that would require the defense commissary system and the exchange store system comply with the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh and give preference to signatories to the Accord on Fire 

and Building Safety in Bangladesh. The Department of Defense 

must notify Congress of garments sold in defense commissaries or 

exchanges that are manufactured in Bangladesh by manufacturers 

who are not signatories to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety 

in Bangladesh. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Effect on division of retired pay of election to receive combat-related 

special compensation after previous election to receive concurrent retirement and disability compensation 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

642) that would amend section 1414 of title 10, United States Code, 

to clarify the effect of an election to receive combat-related special 

compensation (CRSC) after a previous election to receive concurrent retirement and disability compensation (CRDP) was made relVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00618 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
587 

ative to the division of retired pay under section 1408 of title 10, 

United States Code. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We understand that a retiree’s decision to receive CRSC may 

have significant consequences on a former spouse who has been receiving a division of retired pay, including a division of CRDP. 

Such a decision can leave a former spouse with a sizable debt to 

the Federal Government for the past divisions of CRDP already 

paid. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) has the 

authority to waive those debts upon application. We expect DFAS 

to waive those debts relative to past divisions of CRDP when requested, and to make retirees, spouses, and former spouses aware 

of their options in seeking debt forgiveness in this circumstance. 

Provision of status under law by honoring certain members of the 

reserve components as veterans 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 642) that would add 

a new section 107A to title 38, United States Code, to honor as a 

veteran any person entitled to retired pay for nonregular service 

under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, or who, but for 

age, would be entitled to such retired pay. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

Survey of military pay and benefits preferences 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 643) that would require the Secretary of Defense to carry out an anonymous survey 

of random service members regarding military pay and benefit 

preferences. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

Transportation on military aircraft on a space-available basis for 

disabled veterans with a service-connected, permanent disability rated as total 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 644) that would amend 

section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to provide space-available travel on military aircraft to veterans with service-connected, permanent disabilities 

rated as total. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 

Technology, and Logistics issued a letter, dated November 12, 

2013, acknowledging the authority provided by section 622 of the 

National Defense Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), 

regarding the space-available transportation program. The Department is currently conducting a detailed review of the program, to 

include the authorities established under section 622, and will update the appropriate regulatory issuances upon completion. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
588 

Preservation of retiree dependent status for certain dependents upon 

death or permanent incapacitation of the retired member on 

whom dependent status is based 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

645) that would amend section 1060b of title 10, United States 

Code, to clarify that no further certification of a dependent for financial support shall be required or carried out in the case of a dependent who has been granted a permanent identification card by 

reason of permanent disability when the member or retiree providing the basis for dependency dies or becomes permanently incapacitated. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Enhanced role for the Department of Justice under the Military 

Lending Act 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

661) that would amend section 987 of title 10, United States Code, 

to provide civil enforcement authority over the Military Lending 

Act (MLA) to the Department of Justice. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We remain concerned about reports that predatory lenders continue to prey on service members and their families using forms of 

credit designed specifically to evade coverage of the MLA under the 

rules promulgated by the Department of Defense. We strongly encourage agencies with either explicit or implied enforcement authority over the MLA to enforce the MLA to the maximum extent 

possible. In the conference report accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), 

the conferees expressed concern over the evolution of these predatory products and practices since 2006. The conferees thus directed 

the Secretary of Defense to review the evolution of predatory products and practices since 2006 and ‘‘to determine if changes to rules 

implementing section 987 are necessary to protect covered borrowers from continuing and evolving predatory lending practices, 

and to report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate 

and House of Representatives’’ by January 2, 2014, on the results 

of this review. In furtherance of this effort, the Department issued 

an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on June 17, 2013. We 

expect the Department to issue its report by the end of the year 

together with new rules implementing the MLA that will address 

lending products crafted to evade coverage under existing MLA regulations, and all agencies with enforcement powers over the MLA 

to exercise those powers under these new rules to protect service 

members and their families from predatory lending practices. 

Extension of ongoing pilot programs under temporary Army incentive to provide additional recruitment incentives 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

672) that would amend section 681 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163) to authorize 

the Secretary of the Army to continue through December 31, 2015, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
589 

any pilot program carried out under that section that was ongoing 

as of December 31, 2012. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

TITLE VII—HEALTH CARE PROVISIONS

Subtitle A—TRICARE and Other Health Care Benefits 

Future availability of TRICARE Prime for certain beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime (sec. 701) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 711) that would authorize a one-time opt-in to TRICARE Prime for beneficiaries who 

were eligible for TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013, provided the beneficiary remains in the same ZIP code as the ZIP code 

the beneficiary resided in at the time of the opt-in, notwithstanding 

eligibility for enrollment based on the location at which the beneficiary resides. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would authorize a beneficiary who was enrolled in TRICARE Prime 

as of September 30, 2013, to make a one-time election to continue 

such enrollment in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding eligibility for 

enrollment based on the location at which the beneficiary resides, 

provided the beneficiary remains in the same ZIP code as the ZIP 

code the beneficiary resided in at the time of the opt-in, and the 

beneficiary lives within 100 miles of a military medical treatment 

facility. The amendment would also clarify that the Secretary may 

determine whether to maintain a TRICARE network of providers 

in an area that is between 40 and 100 miles of a military medical 

treatment facility. 

Mental health care treatment through telemedicine (sec. 702) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 704) that would require the Secretary of Defense to extend coverage of the Transitional Assistance Management Program (TAMP) to individuals by 

an additional 180 days for treatment provided through telemedicine. The provision would also require the Secretary to extend coverage under TAMP for behavioral health services provided through 

telemedicine for certain individuals for an indefinite period of time. 

This authority would terminate on December 31, 2018. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to extend TAMP coverage for certain individuals for an additional 180 days for mental 

health care provided through telemedicine. If the Secretary chooses 

to extend such coverage, the amendment would require the Secretary to report to the congressional defense committees on the 

rates of utilization of this coverage, the types of mental health care 

provided, and an analysis of how the Secretary of Defense and the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs coordinate the continuation of care 

for veterans who are no longer eligible for TAMP. This authority 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
590 

would terminate on December 31, 2018. The amendment would 

also require the Secretary of Defense, not later than 270 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the use of telemedicine to improve the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injuries, and mental health conditions. 

Comprehensive policy on improvements to care and transition of 

members of the Armed Forces with urotrauma (sec. 703) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 705) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to, not later than January 1, 2014, jointly develop and implement a comprehensive policy on improvements to the care, management, and transition of recovering service members with 

urotrauma. The provision would also require the secretaries to develop the policy in consultation with the heads of other appropriate 

federal agencies, representatives of military service organizations, 

and nongovernmental organizations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs to, not later than 180 days after the enactment of 

this Act, jointly develop and implement a comprehensive policy on 

improvements to the care, management, and transition of recovering service members with urotrauma. 

In developing the comprehensive policy, we encourage the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to consult 

with the heads of other appropriate departments and agencies of 

the Federal Government, representatives of military service organizations representing the interests of service members who are 

urotrauma patients, and appropriate nongovernmental organizations with expertise in matters relating to urotrauma. 

Pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the 

Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic 

stress disorder (sec. 704) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 733) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a 5-year pilot program 

to establish a process to provide payment for investigational treatments of traumatic brain injury (TBI) or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for service members in health care facilities other 

than military treatment facilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot 

program under which the Secretary establishes a process for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of investigational treatments of TBI or PTSD for service members in health care facilities 

other than military treatment facilities. The authority to carry out 

the pilot program would terminate on December 31, 2018. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
591 

Subtitle B—Health Care Administration 

Authority of Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences to 

enter into contracts and agreements and make grants to other 

nonprofit entities (sec. 711) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 722) that would clarify 

the authority of the Secretary of Defense, with regard to the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, to enter into 

contracts and agreements and make grants to nonprofit entities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Pilot program on increased third-party collection reimbursements in 

military medical treatment facilities (sec. 712) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 714) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the service secretaries, to carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility of 

using revenue-cycle management processes, including cash-flow 

management and accounts-receivable processes, for medical payment collection at military medical treatment facilities. The provision would also require the Secretary to submit a report on the 

pilot program not later than 180 days after completion of the program, as well as a report on the current methods employed by the 

military departments to collect charges from third-party payers incurred at military medical treatment facilities not later than 180 

days after the enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 711). 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with 

the service secretaries, to carry out a pilot program to assess the 

feasibility of using commercially-available enhanced recovery practices for medical payment collection, including revenue-cycle management together with rates and percentages of collection in accordance with industry standards, for medical payment collection 

at military medical treatment facilities. The amendment would also 

require the Secretary to submit a report on the pilot program not 

later than 180 days after completion of the program. 

Electronic health records of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs (sec. 713) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 734) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to implement an integrated electronic health record to be used 

by each of the secretaries, by not later than October 1, 2016. The 

provision would also prescribe design principles, technical objectives, activities, and milestones that must be met and require the 

secretaries to jointly develop and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a programs plan for the oversight and execution of the integrated electronic health record program. In addition, 

the provision would limit funding for the integrated electronic 

health record until programs plan and certification requirements 

are completed. The provision would also require the secretaries to 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
592 

jointly establish an advisory panel to support the development and 

validation of requirements, programmatic assessment, and other 

actions with respect to the integrated electronic health record. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

712) that would express the sense of the Senate that: (1) Despite 

years of effort and the expenditure of significant resources, full 

electronic interoperability between the health record systems of the 

Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs has 

not yet been achieved; (2) The Secretary of Defense, in collaboration with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, should fully staff the 

Interagency Program Office and establish challenging, but achievable, deadlines for development and implementation of measures 

and goals for electronic health record interoperability; and (3) The 

Interagency Program Office should establish a secure, remote, and 

network-accessible computer storage system. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs to ensure that the departments’ electronic health 

record systems are interoperable with integrated display of data, or 

a single electronic health record, and that each complies with national standards and architectural requirements. The provision 

would require each department to deploy modernized electronic 

health record software supporting clinicians by no later than December 31, 2016. The provision would also prescribe design principles, technical objectives, activities, and milestones that must be 

met, as well as suggest design elements for the secretaries to consider. The amendment would require the secretaries to prepare and 

brief the appropriate congressional committees with a programs 

plan for the oversight and execution of the interoperable electronic 

health records with integrated display of data, or single electronic 

health record, and would limit funding for the records or record 

until the programs plan is submitted. The amendment would require the secretaries to jointly establish an executive committee to 

support the development and validation of adopted standards, required architectural platforms and structure, and the capacity to 

enforce them. 

In addition, the amendment would require the Secretary of Defense to request the Defense Science Board to conduct an annual 

review of the progress of the Secretary of Defense in achieving the 

mandates prescribed by the amendment. The amendment would 

also require the Secretary of Defense to complete the implementation of the Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution 

(HAIMS) program not later than 180 days after the enactment of 

this Act and, upon completion of such implementation, to provide 

a report to the appropriate congressional committees describing the 

extent of the interoperability between HAIMS and the Veterans 

Benefit Management System of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
593 

Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters 

Display of budget information for embedded mental health providers of the reserve components (sec. 721) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 721) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress, as a part of 

the documentation that supports the President’s annual budget for 

the Department of Defense, a budget justification display for embedded mental health providers within each reserve component, including the amount requested for each reserve component. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Report on role of Department of Veterans Affairs in certain Centers 

of Excellence (sec. 722) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 729) that would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, not later than 60 days after 

the enactment of this Act, to report to the Committees on Armed 

Services and Veterans Affairs of the House of Representatives and 

the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans Affairs of the 

Senate, on the centers of excellence in the prevention, diagnosis, 

mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of: traumatic brain injury; 

post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health conditions; 

and military eye injuries established under sections 1621, 1622, 

and 1623, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, not later than 180 

days after the enactment of this Act, to report to the Committees 

on Armed Services and Veterans Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans Affairs 

of the Senate on the centers of excellence in the prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of: traumatic brain 

injury; post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health conditions; and military eye injuries established under sections 1621, 

1622, and 1623, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181). The amendment would also 

require the Secretary to report on the center of excellence in prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of 

hearing loss and auditory system injuries established under section 

721 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417), as well as the center of excellence in the mitigation, treatment, and rehabilitation of traumatic extremity injuries and amputations established under section 

723 of Public Law 110–417. 

Report on memorandum regarding traumatic brain injuries (sec. 

723) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 732) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary will identify, refer, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
594 

and treat traumatic brain injuries with respect to service members 

who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi 

Freedom before the effective date in June 2010 of the directive type 

memorandum regarding using a 50-meter distance from an explosion as a criterion to properly identify, refer, and treat members for 

potential traumatic brain injury. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Secretary identifies, 

refers, and treats traumatic brain injuries with respect to service 

members who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation 

Iraqi Freedom before the effective date in June 2010 of directive 

type memorandum 09–033 regarding using a 50-meter distance 

from an explosion as a criterion to properly identify, refer, and 

treat members for potential traumatic brain injury. 

Report on provision of advanced prosthetics and orthotics to members of the Armed Forces and veterans (sec. 724) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

721) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs to report, not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, on the plans of the Department of Defense 

(DOD) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to ensure that 

the most clinically appropriate prosthetics and orthotics are made 

available to injured service members and veterans using technological advances as appropriate. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to report, not later than 180 days after the enactment 

of this Act, on the plans of the DOD and VA to ensure that the 

most clinically appropriate prosthetics and orthotics are made 

available to injured service members and veterans using technological advances as appropriate; and to include a description of the 

processes of each Secretary to coordinate and identify care in the 

VA for an injured service member who, prior to being discharged 

or released from the armed forces, has an advanced technology 

prosthetic. 

Comptroller General reports on TRICARE recovery audit program 

and availability of compounded pharmaceuticals (sec. 725) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 735) that would require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit to 

the congressional defense committees a report, not later than 180 

days after the enactment of this Act, that evaluates the similarities 

and differences in the approaches to identifying and recovering improper payments across Medicare and TRICARE. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit to the congressional defense committees a report, not later 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
595 

than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, that evaluates the similarities and differences of Medicare and the TRICARE 

program with respect to identifying and recovering improper payments. The amendment would also require the Comptroller General to submit a report not later than September 30, 2014, to the 

congressional defense committees on the availability of compounded pharmaceuticals in the military health care system. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 701) that would amend 

section 1074m of title 10, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to provide person-to-person mental health assessments once during each 180-day period during which a service 

member is deployed. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that each of the military departments has embedded behavioral health care providers in certain operational and 

deployable units whose purpose is to provide increased access to behavioral health care for service members in theater. 

Periodic mental health assessments for members of the Armed 

Forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 702) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide periodic person-to-person 

mental health assessments to each member of the armed forces 

serving on active duty. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities under 

TRICARE 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 703) that would amend 

section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize behavioral 

health treatment, including applied behavior analysis therapy, for 

all developmental disabilities as defined by section 15002(8) of title 

42, United States Code, including autism spectrum disorders, when 

prescribed by a physician to be covered under the basic TRICARE 

program for certain beneficiaries. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Cooperative health care agreements between the military departments and non-military health care entities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 712) that would authorize the secretaries of the military departments to establish cooperative health care agreements between military installations 

and local or regional non-military health care entities. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
596 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We note that the Secretary of Defense was provided the authority to enter into cooperative health care agreements under section 

713 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

(10 U.S.C. 1073 note), and that the Secretary may delegate this authority. We believe that in circumstances where the Secretary 

deems it appropriate, the Secretary should utilize or delegate this 

authority. 

Limitation on availability of funds for integrated electronic health 

record program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 713) that would limit 

the amount of funds the Secretary of Defense may obligate or expend for procurement or research, development, test and evaluation 

for the integrated electronic health record program until 30 days 

after the date that the Secretary submits a report detailing an 

analysis of alternatives for the plan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Mental health support for military personnel and families 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 723) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to carry out collaborative programs to: respond to suicide and combat stress-related arrest rates 

of service members; train active-duty members to recognize and respond to combat stress disorder, suicide risk, substance addiction, 

risk-taking behaviors, and family violence; and determine the effectiveness of Department of Defense (DOD) efforts to reduce military 

suicide rates. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that in December 2012, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) published in the Federal Register a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to implement the Secure and Responsible Drug 

Disposal Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–273). We believe that the 

proposed rule severely hampers DOD efforts to collect and safely 

dispose of unused prescription drugs. The Assistant Secretary of 

Defense for Health Affairs has expressed concern that DEA’s proposed rule will ‘‘limit DOD’s ability to accept unused patient medications in a routine setting and reduce the potential effectiveness 

of efforts to eliminate opportunities for medication misuse, abuse 

and tragic adverse events.’’ We understand that the DEA has been 

in discussions with the Department to develop workable, accessible, 

readily-available means for service members, retirees, and their dependents to dispose of unused or unwanted controlled substances 

efficiently, but we are discouraged that substantial progress has 

not yet been made. We expect that the DEA’s final rule, once published, will provide the Department with the means to establish a 

meaningful drug take-back program for its beneficiaries toreduce 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
597 

prescription drug misuse, abuse and potential tragic adverse 

events. 

Research regarding hydrocephalus 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 724) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, in conducting the Peer Reviewed 

Medical Research Program, to consider selecting medical research 

projects relating to hydrocephalus. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We encourage the Secretary of Defense to consider including 

medical research on hydrocephalus in Department of Defense research efforts. 

Traumatic brain injury research 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 725) that would require the Secretary of Defense to carry out research, development, 

test, and evaluation activities with respect to traumatic brain injury and psychological health, including activities regarding drug 

development to halt neurodegeneration following traumatic brain 

injury. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Increased collaboration with NIH to combat triple negative breast 

cancer 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 727) that would require the Department of Defense to work in collaboration with the 

National Institutes of Health to identify specific genetic and molecular targets and biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer and 

to provide information that will enable triple negative breast cancer patients to be identified earlier and aid the development of 

therapies for the disease. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We urge the Secretary of Defense to consider conducting research 

to identify specific genetic and molecular targets and biomarkers 

for triple negative breast cancer. 

Sense of Congress on mental health counselors for members of the 

Armed Forces and their families 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 728) that would express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should 

develop a plan to ensure a sustainable flow of qualified counselors 

to meet the long-term needs of service members and their families 

for counselors, to include the participation of accredited schools and 

universities, health care providers, professional counselors, family 

service or support centers, chaplains, and other appropriate Department of Defense resources. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
598 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Preliminary mental health assessments 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 730) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide a mental health assessment to any individual enlisting or being commissioned as an officer in the armed forces prior to such enlistment or commissioning, 

and to use the results of such an assessment as a baseline for any 

subsequent mental health examinations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress on the traumatic brain injury plan 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 731) that would express the sense of Congress that section 739(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) 

requires the Secretary of Defense, not later than 180 days after the 

enactment of such Act, to submit a plan to Congress to improve the 

coordination and integration of Department of Defense programs 

that address traumatic brain injury and the psychological health of 

service members, and that the Secretary should deliver the report 

within the required time frame. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We expect the Secretary of Defense to submit the plan required 

by section 739(b) to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives as soon as possible. 

TITLE VIII—ACQUISITION POLICY, ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT, AND

RELATED MATTERS

Subtitle A—Acquisition Policy and Management 

Enhanced transfer of technology developed at Department of Defense 

laboratories (sec. 801) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 802) that would establish a pilot program to allow Department of Defense (DOD) laboratories to license DOD-owned intellectual property that may or may 

not be patented, and to retain associated royalties consistent with 

existing statues on patent licensing. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Extension of limitation on aggregate annual amount available for 

contract services (sec. 802) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 803) that would extend 

limitations on contract services under section 808 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 111– 

84), through 2015. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
599 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would extend the provision for 1 year. 

Identification and replacement of obsolete electronic parts (sec. 803) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 812) that would amend 

section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) to expand the conditions under 

which covered contractors can qualify for exemption from strict liability associated with rework and corrective action related to counterfeits of obsolete electronic parts. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would require the Department to work with contractors or other 

sources of supply to identify obsolete parts and replace them 

through an expedited engineering change process. 

Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, 

Procedures, and Limitations 

Government-wide limitations on allowable costs for contractor compensation (sec. 811) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 813) that would amend 

section 2324(e)(1)(P) of title 10, United States Code, and section 

4304(a) of title 41, United States Code, to replace the current statutory benchmark compensation formula used to determine the 

amount of contractor compensation that is considered an allowable 

cost for a federal contract, with the current compensation benchmark amount for fiscal year 2013 of $763,209. This section would 

also make unallowable the entire cost of compensation for the five 

most-highly compensated employees of a contractor that was 

awarded more than $500.0 million in federal contracts in the previous fiscal year. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 841) that would reduce the cap on allowable costs of compensation of contractor employees to an amount consistent with the 

original legislative cap, adjusted for inflation, and provide for future annual adjustments by reflecting the change in the Employment Cost Index for all workers, as calculated by the Bureau of 

Labor and Statistics. According to this calculation, the cap for fiscal 

year 2014 would be at $487,325. 

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would revise the cap on compensation of contractor employees and 

provide for future annual adjustments. 

Inclusion of additional cost estimate information in certain reports 

(sec. 812) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 814) that would amend 

section 2432 of title 10, United States Code, to require that the program’s baseline cost estimate, along with the associated risk curve 

and sensitivity of that estimate be provided in the quarterly selected acquisition reports. In addition, this section would require 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
600 

that the reports include the current point estimate bounded by the 

low-end and high-end estimates and the associated sensitivity of 

those estimates, and identification of the primary risk parameters 

associated with the estimate. Furthermore, this section would require reportingof estimated termination liability remaining on the 

contract. Finally, this section would amend section 2334(f) of title 

10, United States Code, to require the Director, Cost Assessment 

and Program Evaluation, to review the information required by 

this section and to include trend information, a summary of findings and recommendations to improve the cost estimates of the Department of Defense in the annual report to Congress on cost assessment activities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a technical amendment. We encourage the Secretary of Defense to include at least 

three programs designated as Acquisition Category I programs in 

the December 2014 reporting period. 

Amendment relating to compelling reasons for waiving suspension 

or debarment (sec. 813) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 815) that would amend 

section 2393(b) of title 10, United States Code, by requiring the 

Secretary of Defense to make available on a publicly accessible 

website any determination that there is a compelling reason to solicit an offer from, award a contract to, extend a contract with, or 

approve a subcontract with an offeror or contractor that has been 

debarred or suspended by a federal agency. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a technical amendment. 

Extension of pilot program on acquisition of military purpose nondevelopmental items (sec. 814) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 831) that would amend 

section 866 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383), by extending the program authority to December 31, 2019. Furthermore, the committee encouraged 

the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and 

Logistics to review the military purpose non-developmental items 

implementation guidance and to exercise the authority provided in 

section 866. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Major Defense Acquisition 

Programs 

Synchronization of cryptographic systems for major defense acquisition programs (sec. 821) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

821) that as part of a milestone B decision for a major defense acVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00632 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
601 

quisition program, would require that there be a plan in place to 

mitigate and account for costs in connection with decertification of 

cryptographic equipment during production and procurement of the 

system. The provision includes a waiver based on national security 

needs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that changes the date of applying this provision to 6 months 

after the date of enactment. 

Assessment of dedicated ground control system before Milestone B 

approval of major defense acquisition programs constituting a 

space program (sec. 822) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

822) that would implement a recommendation from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, Satellite Control Operations, GAO–13–315, concerning the use of dedicated satellite control systems. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that modified title 10, United States Code, and requires the 

Secretary of Defense to develop a long-term plan for satellite 

ground control systems. The plan must be submitted to the congressional defense committees 1 year after the date of enactment. 

We expect that the cost-benefit analysis be based on life-cycle 

cost estimates found within the DOD 5000 directive and instructions. 

The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the 

implementation plan and submit its views no later than 90 days 

after the plan is submitted to the congressional defense committees. 

Additional responsibility for product support managers for major 

weapon systems (sec. 823) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

823) that would amend section 2337 of title 10, United States Code, 

and section 823 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), to provide an assurance that 

all product support arrangements explicitly state how the arrangement will maximize use of government-owned inventory before obtaining inventory from commercial sources. This provision is a result of a Department of Defense Inspector General investigation 

into the Defense Logistics Agency. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a technical amendment. 

Comptroller General review of Department of Defense processes for 

the acquisition of weapons systems (sec. 824) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

824) requiring the Comptroller General to carry out a comprehensive review of the processes and procedures of the Department of 

Defense for the acquisition of weapon systems. The objective of the 

review is to identify processes and procedures for the acquisition of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
602 

weapon systems that provide little or no value or for which any 

value added is outweighed by cost or schedule delays without adding commensurate value. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains this provision with a clarifying amendment. 

We direct the Comptroller General to provide the congressional 

defense committees with the required report no later than January 

31, 2015. 

Subtitle D—Provisions Relating to Contracts in Support of 

Contingency Operations in Iraq or Afghanistan 

Prohibition on contracting with the enemy (sec. 831) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 821) that would amend 

section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81), regarding the authority of the Secretary of Defense to void a contract that is directly or indirectly 

funding a person or entity who actively supports an insurgency or 

otherwise actively opposes the United States or its coalition partners in a contingency operation in the United States Central Command theater of operations , to: (1) Lower the threshold for covered 

contracts from $0.1 million to $0.05 million; (2) Provide the authority to certain other geographic combatant commands during a contingency operation as defined by section 101(a)(13) of title 10, 

United States Code; and (3) Make the authority permanent. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 861) that would amend section 841 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) by 

striking ‘‘the date that is three years after the date of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2016.’’ 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an additional similar provision (section 862) that would expand section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 

112–81) to all combatant commanders. 

The agreement contains that provision with an amendment that 

would amend section 841 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81), making the authorities provided in section 841 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) available to certain 

other combatant commanders. 

We intend that the definition of a ‘‘covered person or entity’’ 

would not mean a person or entity that is engaged in speech activities but rather actions involving hostile opposition to United States 

or coalition forces. 

Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in 

countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan (sec. 

832) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 832) that would extend 

through December 31, 2015, the authority under section 801 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 

Law 111–84), as amended, to procure products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
603 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 802). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Modification of reporting requirement for Department of Defense 

business system acquisition programs when initial operating capability is not achieved within 5 years of Milestone A approval 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 801) that wouldamend 

the reporting requirement imposed on defense business systems 

(DBS) acquisition programs by section 811 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) by 

clarifying the separate treatment of Major Automated Information 

Systems (MAIS) DBS and non-MAIS DBS. Specifically, this section 

would clarify that section 811 is inapplicable to MAIS DBS acquisition programs because such programs are independently subject to 

critical change reporting under section 2445c of title 10, United 

States Code. This section would also modify the requirement for 

non-MAIS DBS reporting a failure to achieve initial operational capacity (IOC) within 5 years of milestone A approval from a critical 

change report to a report to the Department of Defense pre-certification authority explaining the causes and circumstances surrounding the failure to achieve IOC within the required time. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to multiyear 

defense acquisitions to be specifically authorized by law 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

801) that would clarify and reorganize the reporting and certification requirements of the Department of Defense when requesting 

specific authorization for multiyear contract authority. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

Report on program manager training and experience 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

803) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit an updated version of the 2009 Department of Defense report titled: 

‘‘OSD [Office of the Secretary of Defense] Study of Program Manager Training and Experience’’ not later than 120 days from enactment of this Act. 

The report found senior military officers, including general officers, and civilians in charge of acquisition programs did not believe 

their acquisition training was ‘‘sufficiently practical and comprehensive’’ regarding a number of fundamental areas of acquisition management. For example, the following is a partial list of responses showing the percent of program managers polled at that 

time who believed their acquisition training was sufficiently practical and comprehensive: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
604 

Overseeing Contractor Performance ......................................................................................................................... 31% 

Cost Estimating Challenges ..................................................................................................................................... 27% 

Software Management Challenges ........................................................................................................................... 25% 

Cost Control Challenges ........................................................................................................................................... 25% 

Unexpected Cost Growth .......................................................................................................................................... 14% 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain this provision. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive update of the 2009 report not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

The update should also identify, describe, and analyze trends in 

the training and experience of personnel acquisition program management since the issuance of the 2009 report, and should provide 

recommendations for improving the training and experience of personnel performing acquisition program management functions. 

We further direct the Secretary to specifically examine the training, qualifications, and experience of personnel performing acquisition program management functions on programs designated as Acquisition Category I, IA, and II and provide recommendations on 

the ways to improve the practicality and comprehensiveness of the 

acquisition training provided to such personnel. 

Additional contractor responsibilities in regulations relating to detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 811) that would amend 

section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) to provide that the costs associated 

with the use of counterfeit electronic parts, and the subsequent cost 

of rework or corrective action that may be required to remedy the 

use of inclusion of such parts, are allowable costs under Department of Defense contracts if the counterfeit electronic parts were 

procured from an original manufacturer or its authorized dealer, or 

from a trusted supplier. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain this provision. 

Requirement that cost or price to the Federal Government be given 

at least equal importance as technical or other criteria in evaluating competitive proposals for defense contracts 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 816) that would amend 

section 2305(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, to require that 

the head of an agency of the Department of Defense, in prescribing 

the evaluation factors to be included in each solicitation for competitive proposals, assign importance to cost or price at least equal 

to all evaluation factors other than cost or price when combined. 

This section would allow the head of an agency to waive the requirement, and it would require the Secretary of Defense to submit 

to Congress, not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal 

year, a report containing a list of each waiver issued during the 

preceding fiscal year. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
605 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

The Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 15 permits the use of 

several best value competitive source selection techniques. Within 

the best value continuum, the government should utilize the technique that is most advantageous to its interests. 

The government may choose to use the lowest price technically 

acceptable source selection process for acquisitions in which best 

value can be expected to result from the selection of the technically 

acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. 

The government may also choose to use a trade-off source selection process for acquisitions in which it may be in the best interest 

of the government to grant an award to an offeror other than the 

lowest priced offeror or the highest technically rated offeror. In 

such cases, non-cost or price evaluation factors may be weighed 

against cost or price factors in competitive source selections. 

We are concerned that best value competitive source selection 

processes are not always properly implemented. Therefore, we direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a 

study on Department of Defense procurements that use best value 

competitive source selection techniques. The study shall include, at 

a minimum, an assessment of: 

(1) The frequency with which evaluation factors other than 

cost or price, when combined, are given more weight than cost 

or price in solicitations for competitive proposals; 

(2) The types of contracts for products or services for which 

such evaluation factors are most frequently used; 

(3) The reasons why the Department of Defense chooses to 

use such evaluation factors; 

(4) The extent to which the use of such factors is or is not 

in the interest of the Department of Defense; 

(5) The efficacy with which the Department of Defense’s acquisition workforce implements best value competitive source 

selection techniques; 

(6) The Department of Defense’s guidance and directives on 

the appropriate use of best value competitive source selection 

techniques; and 

(7) The extent to which budgetary constraints affect the use 

of best value competitive source selection techniques. 

We direct the Comptroller General to submit to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

a report on the results of this study not later than 180 days after 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Requirement to buy American flags from domestic sources 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 817) that would amend 

section 2533a(b) of title 10, United States Code, to include ‘‘a flag 

of the United States of America’’ to the list of items that the Department of Defense may not procure unless the item is grown, 

processed, reused, or produced in the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
606 

We note that flags of the United States procured by the Department of Defense are procured in accordance with section 

2533a(b)(1)(D) of title 10, United States Code. 

Collection of data relating to contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 822) that would amend 

section 861 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181), as amended, to allow contracts in 

Afghanistan entered into after the enactment of this Act to include 

a clause requiring the imposition of a penalty on any contractor 

that does not comply with the policies, guidance, or regulations 

issued pursuant to that section. This section would also amend section 863 of Public Law 110–181 to require that the Annual Joint 

Report on Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan include information 

on any penalties imposed on contractors for failing to comply with 

requirements under section 861(e) of Public Law 110–181. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

We are concerned about reports of contractor noncompliance with 

relevant policies, guidance, and regulations in Afghanistan, including contractor noncompliance with requirements to provide information for the common databases identified by section 861(b)(4) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181), as amended. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Administrator for the United States Agency 

for International Development, to submit to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, 

the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, not later 

than 180 days after enactment of this Act, a report on contractor 

compliance in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

At a minimum, the report shall include a detailed discussion of 

any outstanding contractor compliance issues or concerns, including any issues or concerns pertaining to the provision of information to common databases or the management thereof; a discussion 

of any lessons learned in Iraq or Afghanistan for improving contractor compliance in a contingency environment; and best practice 

recommendations for ensuring contractor compliance in future contingency contracting operations. 

Report on procurement supply chain vulnerabilities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 833) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report regarding how 

sole source suppliers of components to the Department of Defense 

procurement supply chain creates vulnerabilities to military attack, 

terrorism, natural disaster, industrial shock, financial crisis, or 

geopolitical crisis, such as an embargo of key raw materials or industrial inputs. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
607 

Study on the impact of contracting with veteran-owned small businesses 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 834) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report regarding impacts of the Department of Defense contracting with small businesses owned and controlled by veterans and service-disabled veterans on veteran entrepreneurship and unemployment; impact on 

veteran suicide and homelessness; and the feasibility and expected 

impacts of implementation of the small business goals and preferences detailed in section 8127, title 38, United States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The provision does not contain the agreement. 

Revisions to requirements relating to justification and approval of 

sole-source defense contracts 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 835) that would modify 

the provisions of the Department of Defense Supplement to the 

Federal Acquisition Regulation that implement section 811 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public 

Law 111–84), clarifying the delegable authority of the head of an 

agency to make an award. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

Revision of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to take into account sourcing laws 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 837) that would revise 

the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition 

Regulation to implement requirements imposed by sections 129, 

129a, 2330a, 2461, and 2463 of title 10, United States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

Prohibition on purchase of military coins not made in the United 

States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 838) that would prohibit the purchase of any military coins not produced in the United 

States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

We note military coins are generally purchased with unit-level 

morale funds or funds personally contributed by the members of 

the unit and not with appropriated funds. 

Compliance with domestic source requirements for footwear furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry into the Armed Forces 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 839) that would amend 

section 418 of title 37, United States Code, by requiring the Department of Defense to issue athletic footwear compliant with the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
608 

requirement detailed in section 2533a of title 10, United States 

Code, to members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry in 

lieu of a cash allowance. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

We note that Congress passed the Berry Amendment in 1941 to 

ensure that American soldiers train and operate, to the greatest extent practicable, in American-made materials. The Berry Amendment specifically covers footwear listed in Federal Supply Class 

8430 or 8435. 

The Army, in 2001, and the Air Force, in 2008, have moved away 

from issuing athletic footwear to new recruits. Instead, new recruits are given an allowance to acquire athletic footwear from the 

service exchange. 

During this period of time, no athletic footwear was available 

that could have met the requirements of the Berry Amendment 

without a waiver. It has been reported that at least one domestic 

contractor is now producing such footwear. 

Therefore, we direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to issue a Sources Sought to determine whether there are any domestic manufacturers of Berry 

Amendment-compliant athletic footwear that meets the Department’s requirements. 

We further direct that any responses to the Sources Sought be 

evaluated by the Defense Logistics Agency and an independent entity to determine whether (1) such offered athletic footwear meets 

the requirements of the Berry Amendment and (2) whether Department requirements are actually met. Such review should consider 

the various sizes and fits of athletic shoes offered, cost, and capacity of suppliers to meet military requirements. 

Implementation by Department of Defense of certain recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States on oversight of pensions offered by Department contractors 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

842) that would require the Secretary of Defense to assign responsibility within the Department of Defense (DOD) for oversight of 

the reasonableness of the pension plans offered by Department contractors and issue certain guidance on pension benefits. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

We note that, according to the Government Accountability Office 

(GAO), DOD contractors are among the largest sponsors of defined 

benefit pension plans in the United States and also factor pension 

costs into the price of DOD contracts. We also note that in its January 2013 report, GAO made the following recommendations to the 

Secretary of Defense in order to improve oversight, management, 

and accountability of such pension plans: 

(1) Assign responsibility within the DOD for oversight of the 

reasonableness of the pension plans offered by Department contractors, specifically the value of benefits earned by participants in 

such pension plans; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
609 

(2) Issue guidance on the measurement of the value of pension 

benefits that participants earn in a given year, in order to permit 

the Department to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the 

total compensation provided to employees by Department contractors; 

(3) Issue guidance on the extent to which defined benefit pension plans will be included in assessments of the reasonableness of 

compensation for executives of Department contractors; and 

(4) Issue guidance for the acquisition organizations of the Department, including the Defense Contract Management Activity 

and Defense Contract Audit Activity, in regards to the discount 

rate or rates that are acceptable for Department contractors to use 

in calculating person costs for forward pricing purposes. 

We are pleased that the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, concurred with all such recommendations in his 

January 2, 2013 response letter and note that he also expressed 

clear intent to implement them. However, we are concerned that 

according to GAO, all four recommendations are yet to be closed. 

Therefore, we encourage the Secretary of Defense to move expeditiously to close out implementation of the recommendations, and to 

keep the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives informed of the progress. 

Report on the elimination of improper payments 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

863) that would require the Secretary of Defense to report on the 

Department’s plan to implement the recommendations of the 

Comptroller General regarding the elimination of improper payments. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act 

The House bill contained a set of provisions (sec. 5001–5506) that 

would increase the authority of Chief Information Officers (CIO) regarding information technology (IT) investment practices for the 16 

major civilian agencies, including the Department of Defense. The 

purpose of these provisions was to increase efficiencies governmentwide by streamlining the acquisition process, increasing transparency, eliminating duplication and waste, and strengthening 

public-private partnerships by empowering the CIO with greater 

responsibility for IT systems within a government agency. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the acquisition of information technology is a challenge across the Federal Government and that reform of the information technology acquisition process remains a priority in the defense committees and the Congress. We expect to continue working 

on improvements in this area and hope to bring a set of comprehensive reforms forward in the next fiscal year. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
610 

TITLE IX—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ORGANIZATION AND

MANAGEMENT

Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management 

Revisions to composition of transition plan for defense business enterprise architecture (sec. 901) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 902) that would revise 

the definition for legacy systems in section 2222 of title 10, United 

States Code, to align with the updated business systems investment review process. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does contain the provision. 

Comptroller General report on potential relocation of Federal Government tenants onto military installations in the United States 

(sec. 902) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 904) that would require the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a report to Congress regarding potential consolidation of federal agency 

facilities onto military installations, with specific consideration of 

installations that support Arctic missions. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment. 

Clarification of authority for the command acquisition executive of 

the United States Special Operations Command (sec. 903) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

902) that would make the U.S. Special Operations Command 

(USSOCOM) Acquisition Executive subject to the direction of the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD (AT&L)). The provision would also require the USD 

(AT&L) to designate an appropriate official within the Office of the 

USD (AT&L) to provide such oversight and direction for those programs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would modify the provision to make clear that the 

USSOCOM Acquisition Executive is responsible to the Commander 

of USSOCOM for the acquisition of special operations-peculiar 

equipment and subordinate to the USD (AT&L) for all acquisition 

matters. The provision would not alter the relationship between 

the USSOCOM Acquisition Executive and the Commander of 

USSOCOM. Further, it is not the intent of the provision to delay, 

unnecessarily impede, or undermine the flexibility of USSOCOM 

development and acquisition efforts. 

We remain supportive of USSOCOM’s unique acquisition authorities to provide for the special operations-peculiar requirements 

of its forces, including rapid acquisition of urgently needed capabilities for deployed or deploying special operations forces. Further, we 

note that the flexibility inherent in these authorities is important 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
611 

to ensuring that special operations forces can adapt to the rapidly 

evolving nature of global threats. However, given the significant 

growth in USSOCOM’s budget in recent years and current fiscal 

pressures, we believe it is necessary to clarify civilian oversight of 

USSOCOM investment programs, particularly the development and 

acquisition of special operations-peculiar platforms. 

We note that the John Warner National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364), as amended, requires the Secretary of Defense to designate a senior acquisition official within USD (AT&L) to oversee the exercise of acquisition authority by USSOCOM, among others. Additionally, section 138 of 

title 10, United States Code, states that the ‘‘principal duty’’ of the 

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict (ASD SOLIC) is ‘‘overall supervision (including 

oversight of policy and resources) of special operations activities.’’ 

We believe appropriate civilian oversight by USD (AT&L) and ASD 

SOLIC of USSOCOM acquisition activities is critical to ensuring effective use of taxpayer funds, particularly with regard to the development and acquisition of special operations-peculiar platforms and 

advanced technology programs that are at greatest risk of incurring delays and additional costs. Therefore, we direct the Secretary 

of Defense to provide the congressional defense committees, not 

later than 90 days after enactment of this act, a directive type 

memorandum outlining the respective roles and responsibilities of 

the USD (AT&L) and ASD SOLIC with regard to the oversight of 

USSOCOM acquisition activities and the mechanisms through 

which such oversight will occur. 

Streamlining of Department of Defense management headquarters 

(sec. 904) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

905) that would require the Secretary of Defense to develop a plan 

for streamlining Department of Defense management headquarters 

by reducing the size of staffs, eliminating tiers of management, cutting functions that provide little or no added value, and consolidating overlapping and duplicative program offices. The objective is 

to reduce aggregate spending for management headquarters by not 

less than $100.0 billion over a 10 fiscal-year period beginning with 

fiscal year 2015. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would remove the savings objective from bill language. We note the 

Secretary of Defense’s recent announcement that he is seeking 

$40.0 billion in savings in these areas. We expect that the Secretary’s goal will be met. 

We also note that section 113 of title 10, United States Code, requires the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress each year a 

report that contains a comprehensive net assessment of the defense 

capabilities and programs of the armed forces of the United States 

and its allies as compared with those of their potential adversaries. 

We are concerned that in the course of a review intended to identify potential efficiencies and cost savings in the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) the recommendation has been made to 

make the net assessment function subordinate to another OSD ofVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00643 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
612 

fice. Such a change would risk compromising the independence of 

the Office of Net Assessment without achieving significant efficiencies. 

Accordingly, we direct the Secretary of Defense to provide to the 

congressional defense committees, not later than March 1, 2014, a 

report that identifies the estimated savings and efficiencies that 

would be achieved through the reorganization or realignment of the 

Office of Net Assessment and explains how the Secretary of Defense would ensure the continuing independence of net assessment 

and the ability to report directly to the Secretary, in the event that 

a decision were made to modify the organizational structure or reporting arrangements of the office. 

Update of statutory statement of functions of the Chairman of the 

Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to doctrine, training, and education (sec. 905) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

906), as requested by the Department of Defense, that would codify 

the responsibility of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 

(CJCS) by amending section 153 of title 10, United States Code, to 

reflect the current joint training, doctrine, education, and force development functions that are overseen by the CJCS. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Modification of reference to major Department of Defense headquarters activities instruction (sec. 906) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

907) that would amend section 194(f) of title 10, United States 

Code, to update the reference to Department of Defense Instruction 

5100.73, titled ‘‘Major DOD Headquarters Activities.’’ 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision. 

Personnel security (sec. 907) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

931) that would require major reform of the personnel security 

clearance investigation, adjudication, and transfer processes to improve security and reduce costs. Specifically, the provision would 

require: 

(1) The Director of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation to 

conduct a comprehensive, comparative analysis of the cost, schedule, and performance of personnel security investigations acquired 

through the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and through 

components of the Department of Defense (DOD); 

(2) The Secretary of Defense to develop a plan by October 1, 

2014, to acquire investigations through the approach most advantageous to DOD; 

(3) The Secretary and the Director of National Intelligence 

(DNI) to develop a joint strategy to modernize all aspects of personnel security to lower costs and improve security, and to develop 

and report annually on metrics that will demonstrate progress in 

achieving those objectives; 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
613 

(4) The Secretary and the DNI to consider, and allow them to 

adopt, a series of innovations in security investigation methods and 

data sources that have been shown to be effective through analysis 

and/or demonstrations; 

(5) The Secretary and the DNI to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, reciprocal acceptance of clearances; and 

(6) Development of benchmarks by which to measure the current level of reciprocity in clearance transfers and the costs imposed by delays. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would (1) include the Director of the Office of Management and Budget along with the Secretary of Defense and the DNI 

in the requirement to develop and implement a strategy to modernize the personnel security process; (2) require the Secretary and 

the Directors to consider the results of ongoing reviews occasioned 

by unauthorized disclosures of classified information and by the 

events at the Washington Navy Yard; (3) require the strategy to include a risk-based monitoring approach based on the responsibilities and accesses of cleared personnel; require the Comptroller 

General to conduct a review of the personnel security process; and 

require the Suitability and Security Performance Accountability 

Council to convene a task force to examine access to State and local 

public records of Federal Government and contractor investigators. 

Subtitle B—Space Activities 

National security space satellite reporting policy (sec. 911) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 911) that would amend 

chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, to add a notification, 

required of the Secretary of Defense, of each attempt by a foreign 

actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a U.S. national security space 

capability. The notification shall be submitted to the appropriate 

congressional committees not later than 48 hours after the Secretary determines that there is reason to believe such an attempt 

occurred. Not later than 10 days after the date on which the Secretary determines that there is reason to believe such an attempt 

occurred, further information should be provided including the 

name and a brief description of the national security space capability that was impacted by such an attempt; a description of the 

attempt, including the foreign actor, the date and time of the attempt, and any related capability outage and the mission impact of 

such outage; and any other information considered relevant by the 

Secretary. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that strikes the sense of Congress, provides that the Commander 

of U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) provide the notice instead of the Secretary, and adds other information the Commander 

considers relevant to the notice. 

We note that the notice is not intended to be a duplicative process and should leverage existing STRATCOM anomaly processes. 

We further note that this notice is not intended to be notification 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
614 

of every anomaly instance; this is only notification when there is 

reason to believe that there was an intentional attempt to disrupt, 

degrade, or destroy a national security space capability. 

National security space defense and protection (sec. 912) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 912) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to enter into an arrangement 

with the National Research Council to conduct a review in response 

to the near-term and long-term threats to the national security 

space systems of the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence to enter into an arrangement with the National 

Research Council while requiring, in addition to other elements of 

the study, the Council take into account the affordability and technical risk of recommended courses of action. 

Space acquisition strategy (sec. 913) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 913) that would require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of 

the Department of Defense, to establish a strategy for the multiyear procurement of commercial satellite services. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that changes the report to a briefing within 90 days after the date 

of enactment with an interim briefing at the time of the fiscal year 

2015 budget submission. 

Consistent with the Defense Business Board report, ‘‘Taking Advantage of Opportunities for Commercial Satellite Services,’’ Report 

FY13–02, February 2013, we direct the Executive Agent for Space 

to report back to the congressional defense committees before 

March 1, 2014, on how this office will take a more active role in 

implementing recommendation 10 of the report titled, ‘‘Facilitate 

future governance by designating a single DoD organization for 

procuring all SATCOM assets and services.’’ 

We understand the U.S. Strategic Command, through the Defense Information Systems Agency, is involved with developing a 

long-term strategy for satellite communications titled, ‘‘Mix of 

Media Study.’’ We direct the Director of the Defense Information 

Systems Agency to brief the congressional defense committees on 

this study. 

We are concerned about the Department’s reliance on 1–year 

high-cost commercial satellite communications leases, and encourage the Department to continue to pursue innovative acquisition 

approaches, including multi-year leases and the procurement of 

government-owned transponders and payloads on commercial communication satellites. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
615 

Space control mission report (sec. 914) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 914) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the space control mission of the Department of Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that requires an additional element of the report regarding force 

levels and structure of the future space control missions. 

We believe the nature of the Department’s space control mission 

is fundamentally changing from purely collision avoidance and cataloging space objects, to additionally ensuring that the United 

States has, according to section 4(b) of the October 18, 2012, Department of Defense Directive on Space Policy, ‘‘the capabilities to 

respond at the time and place of our choosing’’ to ‘‘purposeful interference with U.S. space systems, including their supporting infrastructure’’ in ensuring the right of ‘‘free access and use of space.’’ 

Consistent with the space policy directive, it is incumbent upon the 

Department to ensure there is a clear and concise concept of operations which supports the directive and that the congressional defense committees are updated on any significant developments as 

this additional mission evolves. 

Responsive launch (sec. 915) 

The House amendment contained a provision (sec. 915) that 

would require a study by the Department of Defense 

Executive Agent for Space on responsive, low-cost launch efforts 

to include a review of existing and past operationally responsive, 

low-cost launch capabilities; a technology assessment of various 

methods to develop an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability; and an assessment of the viability of any other innovative 

methods, such as secondary payload adapters on existing launch 

vehicles. In addition, this section would require a report from the 

Executive Agent for Space regarding the results of the above mentioned study, as well as a consolidated plan for development within 

the Department of an operationally responsive, low-cost launch capability. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would add as one of the factors the Executive Agent for Space 

to consider as part of the study to be the identification of the conditions or requirements for responsive launch, which would provide 

the necessary military value, such as the requisite payload capacity, timelines for responsiveness, and the target launch costs. The 

amendment would also require a Government Accountability Office 

(GAO) review of the report by the Executive Agent for Space. The 

GAO may present the results of their review in the form of a briefing to the congressional defense committees. 

Limitation on use of funds for Space Protection Program (sec. 916) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

921) that would limit the amount of money able to be obligated or 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
616 

expended for the Space Protection Program by $10 million until the 

Secretary of Defense submitted to the congressional defense committees a copy of all materials presented to inform the decision of 

the Deputy Secretary of Defense on the counter space strategy of 

the Department of Defense during the 3–year period ending on the 

date of the enactment of this Act that resulted in significant revisions to said strategy. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

We agree that the Secretary of Defense should provide the briefing, report, or other materials that were presented to the Deputy 

Secretary of Defense, which includes the Deputy Secretary Management Action Group briefing materials. We do not expect new 

work product to be produced. We expect the Department of Defense 

to submit only the materials that were presented to the Secretary 

to inform his decision on the way forward for the counterspace 

strategy, which would not include preliminary or background materials. 

Eagle Vision system (sec. 917) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1065) that would require the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, within 

180 days of the enactment of this Act, to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Eagle Vision imagery 

ground station. The report elements would include a description 

and assessment of the Department of Defense organizations to 

which the Eagle Vision system could be transferred, as well as the 

actions that would need to be taken prior to a transfer; the potential schedule for a transfer; and the possible effects of a transfer 

on the capabilities or use of the system. The provision would prohibit the Air Force from making changes to the organization and 

management of the program until 90 days after the submission of 

the report to Congress. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported provision. 

Subtitle C—Defense Intelligence and Intelligence-Related Activities 

Revision of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial 

activities as security for intelligence collection activities (sec. 

921) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 921) that would modify 

current statutory authority for the Secretary of Defense to conduct 

commercial activities that are necessary to provide security for authorized intelligence collection activities abroad undertaken by the 

Department of Defense. The provision would remove the requirement that the Secretary of Defense designate a single office within 

the Defense Intelligence Agency to be responsible for the management and supervision of all commercial activities authorized by the 

intelligence commercial activity statute; change the annual audit 

requirement to a biennial audit requirement; and add the congressional defense committees to the reporting requirement. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
617 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would maintain the annual audit requirement. 

Department of Defense intelligence priorities (sec. 922) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 922) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a written policy governing the internal coordination and prioritization of intelligence 

priorities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, 

the combatant commands, and the military departments to improve 

identification of the intelligence needs of the Department of Defense. This section would also require the Secretary of Defense to 

identify any significant intelligence gaps of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and 

the military departments. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Defense Clandestine Service (sec. 923) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 923) that would prohibit the use of 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise available to the Department of Defense (DOD) for fiscal year 2014 for the Defense Clandestine Service (DCS) to be obligated or expended for the DCS until such time 

as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense 

committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence 

of the Senate, that the DCS is designed primarily to fulfill priorities of the DOD that are unique to the DOD or otherwise unmet; 

and provide unique capabilities to the intelligence community (as 

defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

U.S.C. 401a(4))). 

This section would also require the Secretary of Defense to design metrics that will be used to ensure that the DCS is employed 

in the manner certified; provide annual assessments for 5 years 

based on the metrics established; submit prompt notifications of 

any significant changes; and provide quarterly briefings on deployments and collection activities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

932) that would require the Secretary of Defense, acting through 

the Director of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation, and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, acting through 

the Cost Analysis Improvement Group, and the Director of the 

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), to assess the potential cost savings and effectiveness improvements from consolidating clandestine 

human intelligence collection in the National Clandestine Service 

managed by the CIA. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
618 

Prohibition on National Intelligence Program consolidation (sec. 

924) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 924) that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense from using any of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department 

of Defense during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2014, to execute: the 

separation of the portion of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the National Intelligence Program from the rest 

of the Department of Defense budget; the consolidation of the portion of the Department of Defense budget designated as part of the 

National Intelligence Program within the Department of Defense 

budget; or the establishment of a new appropriations account or appropriations account structure for such funds. The provision would 

also require the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National 

Intelligence to jointly brief the congressional defense and intelligence committees not later than 30 days after enactment of this 

Act on any planning relating to future execution that has occurred 

during the past 2 years and any anticipated future planning and 

related efforts. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle D—Cyberspace-Related Matters 

Modification of requirement for inventory of Department of Defense 

tactical data link systems (sec. 931) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 931) that would amend 

section 934 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to include a requirement that the 

vulnerabilities of data link systems be assessed in anti-access or 

area-denial environments. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Authorities, capabilities, and oversight of the United States Cyber 

Command (sec. 932) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 932) that would require the Defense Science Board to conduct an independent assessment of the organization, missions, and authorities of U.S. Cyber 

Command (CYBERCOM). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 941) that would require the Secretary of Defense to delegate 

signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection authorities to CYBERCOM; 

provide CYBERCOM with the infrastructure and equipment to operate independently of the National Security Agency (NSA) to conduct operations in cyberspace; provide range capabilities to meet 

CYBERCOM’s unique requirements for wartime offensive operations; designate an official within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy to serve as the Secretary’s principal advisor on offensive military cyber operations and to supervise the organization, manning, and equipping of such forces; and to establish 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
619 

appropriate training facilities for cyber personnel. In addition, the 

provision would express the sense of Congress that CYBERCOM 

personnel assigned to support offensive cyber missions should be 

funded and managed outside of the Military Intelligence Program 

(MIP) and Information Systems Security Program (ISSP). 

The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported provision 

with an amendment. The amendment would assign to the principal 

advisor responsibility for the overall supervision of cyber activities 

in the Department, including oversight of policy and operational 

matters, resources, personnel, acquisition, and technology. In carrying out these responsibilities, the principal advisor shall create 

a full-time cross-functional team of subject-matter experts from the 

Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the military departments, defense agencies, and combatant commands. 

We stress that this construct of an interdepartmental team 

under the direction of the principal advisor for cyber is not intended to be merely a coordinating committee, but will provide 

strong leadership through a joint mechanism to achieve a common 

purpose and unity of effort in policy, planning, programming, and 

oversight to support a complex mission that spans the entire Department of Defense. We believe there are good models for effective 

cross-functional teams, such as the Joint Inter Agency Task ForceSouth, which successfully brings stakeholders together, including 

their specific authorities and capabilities, under a single organization. This team concept requires that members operate and think 

holistically, without regard to home institution loyalties, and receive training in team dynamics and conflict resolution. 

With regard to cyber acquisitions, we note that there is an existing congressionally-mandated joint entity, the Cyber Investment 

Management Board, which is chaired by the Under Secretary of 

Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and the Vice Chairman of the Joint 

Chiefs of Staff. We believe such organizations should be leveraged 

to the extent possible in organizing this cross functional team. 

The amendment does not include the requirement for the Secretary of Defense to delegate SIGINT authority to CYBERCOM, because the NSA Director has already made such a delegation. If a 

decision is made in the future to separate the positions of NSA Director and Commander of CYBERCOM, it would be appropriate for 

this delegation to come directly from the Secretary of Defense. 

The amendment also does not include the sense of the Congress 

that CYBERCOM personnel assigned to support offensive missions 

should be funded and managed outside of the MIP and ISSP. We 

expect the Secretary of Defense to devise means to ensure that 

CYBERCOM personnel include non-career intelligence and cybersecurity officers and enlisted personnel with experience in combat 

arms. 

We are aware that there are renewed deliberations about the potential of elevating U.S. Cyber Command from a sub-unified command to a full unified command. As noted by section 940 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 

112–239), we expect to be briefed and consulted on any such proposal at the time when the Secretary of Defense makes such a decision. As these policy discussions progress, we expect the DepartVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00651 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
620 

ment to keep the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives informed, upon request, during the 

quarterly cyber operations briefings, particularly as they relate to 

the estimated costs and policy implications associated with making 

the U.S. Cyber Command a unified command. 

Mission analysis for cyber operations of Department of Defense (sec. 

933) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 933) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a mission analysis of Department of Defense cyber operations and to provide a report on 

the results of the mission analysis to the congressional defense 

committees. It would also require the Chief of the National Guard 

Bureau to provide an assessment of the role of the National Guard 

in supporting Department of Defense cyber missions. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 945) that would require the Secretary of Defense to develop 

a strategy for using the reserve components of the armed forces to 

support the cyber missions of U.S. Cyber Command, including in 

support of civil authorities, and to report to the congressional defense committees on this strategy within 180 days of the enactment 

of this Act. 

The agreement merges these provisions with minor modifications 

to each. 

Modification of requirement for Report on Department of Defense 

Progress in Defending the Department and the Defense Industrial Base from Cyber Events (sec. 934) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 934) that would require that the Secretary of Defense provide written notification to 

the congressional defense committees within 30 days of the initiation of any investigations carried out related to the potential compromise of Department of Defense critical program information related to weapon systems and other developmental activities, and 

within 30 days of the completion of any such investigations. Additionally, the provision would require a report to be submitted to the 

congressional defense committees within 60 days after the date of 

the enactment of this Act, on all of the known network cyber intrusions from January 1, 2000, until August 1, 2013, resulting in compromise of critical program information. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would modify section 935(b)(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) 

to include an element in the existing reporting requirement to address the economic impacts of reported network intrusions. 

Additional requirements relating to the software licenses of the Department of Defense (sec. 935) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 935) that would require the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense 

to revise the reporting requirements of section 937 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to inVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00652 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
621 

clude new elements that would verify that the format of the process 

was verified by an independent third party, implement processes 

for validating and reporting registration and deregistration of new 

software, and update the timeline for implementation based on 

these new requirements. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a technical amendment. 

Cyber outreach and threat awareness for small businesses (sec. 936) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 938) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish an outreach and education program to assist small businesses to help them understand 

the cyber threat, and develop plans to protect their intellectual 

property and networks. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require a briefing to the congressional defense committees within 60 days of the enactment of this Act on options for 

strengthening outreach and threat awareness activities for small 

businesses. 

We recognize the challenges faced by industry, especially small 

businesses, when it comes to understanding and defending against 

advanced cyber threats. There are a number of initiatives and 

mechanisms within the Department that address aspects of this 

challenge, such as the Defense Industrial Base Information Assurance/Cyber Security program. Because these other efforts exist, we 

believe that new programs are not needed. We believe, though, that 

inadequate attention has been paid to effectively coordinate those 

initiatives, focus them on supporting the needs of small businesses, 

or attempt to measure the strategic effectiveness of those programs. 

Joint Federated Centers for Trusted Defense Systems for the Department of Defense (sec. 937) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

942) that would require the Secretary of Defense to establish a 

joint software assurance center to serve as a resource for securing 

the software acquired, developed, maintained, and used in the Department of Defense (DOD). The provision would require the Secretary to consider whether an existing center could fulfill the purposes of the required center. 

The provision would require the Secretary, within 180 days after 

the date of enactment of this Act, to issue a charter for the center 

that lays out: (1) The center’s role in supporting program offices in 

implementing DOD’s supply chain risk management strategy and 

policies; (2) The center’s expertise and capabilities; (3) The center’s 

management, in coordination with the Center for Assured Software 

(CAS) of the National Security Agency, of a research and development program to improve the capability of automated software 

analysis tools; and (4) The center’s management of the procurement 

and distribution of enterprise licenses for such analysis tools. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
622 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would create a federation of capabilities, rather than a 

single center, as well as link existing resources and centers of excellence, for hardware as well as software assurance. Additionally, 

the amendment would emphasize supporting the trusted defense 

systems strategy, which includes both software assurance activities, as well as assurance of hardware components. In assessing the 

capabilities that exist throughout the Department that could be 

used to support the trusted defense strategy, the Department shall 

only create new centers or new resources when it has conducted a 

gap analysis that indicates the need for new resources or capabilities. 

We believe that the trusted defense systems strategy provides a 

good foundation for guiding the work of these centers in supporting 

the acquisition and testing community. As it relates specifically to 

software assurance, we further note that the DOD is in the process 

of developing a baseline software assurance policy for the entire life 

cycle of covered systems in response to section 933 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239). We believe that any such guidance and direction for Department program managers should, where possible, and where consistent with adequate security for covered systems and the national 

security, be consistent with recognized standards, and should explore options for accepting self-certification or third-party certification for compliance purposes. 

Furthermore, we believe that this software assurance policy 

should, where possible, and where consistent with adequate security for covered systems and the national security, be developed in 

compliance with the Office of Management and Budget Memorandum for Chief Information Officers and Senior Procurement Executive’s titled ‘‘Technology Neutrality,’’ dated January 7, 2011. We 

also believe that any future software assurance policy that includes 

requirements concerning Federal participation in the development 

and use of voluntary consensus standards should be conducted in 

accordance with the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, section 272 of title 15, United States Code, and 

the Office of Management and Budget Circular A–119. 

Supervision of the acquisition of cloud computing capabilities (sec. 

938) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

943) that would require the Secretary of Defense, through the 

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Under Secretary of the Defense for Intelligence, the Chief 

Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, to supervise the 

development and implementation of plans for the acquisition of 

cloud computing capabilities for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance data analysis in the military services and defense 

agencies. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
623 

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would make the supervisory requirements apply to all cloud computing acquisition decisions in excess of $1.0 million. 

Cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense weapon systems and 

tactical communications systems (sec. 939) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

944) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide an assessment of the cyber threats to major weapons systems and tactical communications systems that could emerge within the next 

years; an assessment of the cyber vulnerabilities of major weapons 

systems and tactical communications systems; a description of the 

current strategy to defend against battlefield cyber attacks; and an 

estimate of the costs to correct the vulnerabilities in the future. 

That report would be required within 180 days. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the report within 1 year. 

Control of the proliferation of cyber weapons (sec. 940) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

946) that would require the President to establish an interagency 

process to develop policy to control the proliferation of cyber weapons through unilateral and cooperative export controls, law enforcement activities, financial means, diplomatic engagement, and other 

means that the President considers appropriate. The provision 

would also require the President to develop a statement of principles regarding U.S. positions on controlling the proliferation of 

cyber weapons to create new opportunities for bilateral and multilateral cooperation to address this shared threat. The provision 

would require the interagency process to produce recommendations 

within 270 days of the enactment of this Act. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the President, to the extent practicable, 

to provide for industry participation in the interagency process. 

Integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace (sec. 941) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

947) that would require the President to establish an interagency 

process to develop an integrated policy to deter adversaries in 

cyberspace. The provision would require the President to provide a 

report to the congressional defense committees on this policy within 270 days after the enactment of this Act. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

National Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance 

Education matters (sec. 942) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

948) that would ensure that Centers of Academic Excellence 

(CAEs) in Information Assurance do not lose their certification as 

CAEs in fiscal year 2014 as a result of recent changes in the certification criteria developed by the National Security Agency (NSA). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
624 

The provision also would require the President, in consultation 

with the Secretary of Education and with the advice of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, 

to: (1) Determine whether information assurance has matured to 

the point where the Federal Government should no longer serve as 

the accrediting authority for information assurance programs at institutions of higher education; and (2) Based on that determination, 

reform the current practice of NSA developing the criteria to guide 

the curricula and certifying the status of the CAEs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would: (1) Extend the period through which the current 

CAEs would preserve their designation to June 30, 2015; (2) Task 

the Secretary of Defense to thoroughly assess the CAEs program, 

the maturity of cybersecurity as an academic discipline, the role 

that the Federal Government should continue to play in developing 

curricula and accrediting programs, and the alignment of current 

processes with the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education; 

(3) Require the Secretary to make recommendations for improving 

the curricula and designation process and for transitioning that 

process from the sole administration of NSA; (4) Require the Secretary to assess the Department’s scholarship for service program 

with the CAEs; and (5) Require the Secretary to submit to Congress a plan for implementing his recommendations and the results 

of his assessments. The provision requires the Secretary to consult 

with the Secretary of Homeland Security, a wide variety of others, 

including the Director of NSA, and other government organizations, academia, and the private sector. 

Subtitle E—Total Force Management 

Reviews of appropriate manpower performance (sec. 951) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 942) that would require the Secretary of Defense to certify that all contractor positions performing inherently governmental functions have been 

eliminated. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with an amendment that 

would extend the requirement contained in section 803(c) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010 (P.L. 111– 

84) for 3 years and require the Department of Defense (DOD) Inspector General to report to the congressional defense committees 

the Inspector General’s assessment of DOD’s efforts to compile the 

inventory, including the actions taken to resolve the findings of the 

reviews, pursuant to section 2463 of this title. 

Six years beyond the original requirement to implement an inventory of contracted services, DOD has taken its first steps to implement a November 2011 plan to collect contractor manpower data 

from contractors. These steps included directing components to 

start collecting direct labor hours and associated costs from contractors and initiating efforts to develop and implement a department-wide data collection system based on the Army’s Contractor 

Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA) to collect and store inVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00656 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
625 

ventory data, including contractor manpower data. Reportedly, 

DOD officials estimate that the new system will be available in fiscal year 2014, with DOD components reporting on most of their 

contracted services by fiscal year 2016. 

We expect DOD to continue to make progress towards implementing these goals, and therefore, have continued the reporting 

requirements in section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2010 (P.L. 111–84) for 3 years. We expect 

the Comptroller General to submit a report consistent with that 

section including a review of progress made to develop and implement a department-wide data collection system based on CMRA. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Redesignation of the Department of the Navy as the Department of 

the Navy and Marine Corps 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 901) that would redesignate the Department of the Navy as the Department of the Navy 

and Marine Corps, and redesignate the position of the Secretary of 

the Navy as the Secretary of the Navy and the Marine Corps. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Under Secretary of Defense for Management 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

901) that would convert the position of Deputy Chief Management 

Officer (DCMO) to Under Secretary of Defense for Management 

(USD(M)) and to designate that position as the Chief Information 

Officer (CIO) of the Department of Defense. This provision would 

mandate the USD(M) exercise authority, direction, and control over 

the Information Assurance Directorate of the National Security 

Agency. Additionally, this provision would unify roles and functions 

traditionally formed by the CIO and strengthen the office by making it a Senate-confirmed position again, but without creating a 

new position. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

We note that the Department has recently made the congressional defense committees aware of a proposal that addresses the 

concerns raised by the Senate committee-reported bill. We will 

evaluate this proposal before making a decision on elevating the 

DCMO and designating that new position as responsible for the 

CIO roles. 

Report on strategic importance of United States military installation of the U.S. Pacific Command 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 903) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on the strategic 

value of each major installation that supports operations in the 

U.S. Pacific Command area of responsibility. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
626 

Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory Panel from 

Department of the Navy to National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

904) that would transfer responsibility for administration of the 

Ocean Research Advisory Panel from the Department of the Navy 

to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Navy broad-area maritime surveillance aircraft 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

933) that would require the Secretary of Defense to take appropriate actions to modify the Navy’s Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) aircraft fleet to provide a ground moving target indicator (GMTI) collection, processing, and dissemination capability 

that is comparable to the performance of the Air Force’s Global 

Hawk Block 40 Multi-Platform Radar Insertion Program. The provision would also require the Secretary to designate the BAMS aircraft fleet as a joint asset available to support the operational requirements of the unified combatant commands. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We agree, however, that the Department of Defense should determine whether a GMTI capability should be integrated into the 

Navy’s BAMS aircraft fleet, and whether this system should be a 

joint asset for the combatant commands. Therefore, we direct the 

Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in his capacity as the 

Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC), to 

conduct a study and provide a report to the appropriate congressional committees on the JROC’s assessment of whether adding a 

GMTI capability to the Navy’s BAMS aircraft fleet is feasible, affordable, and advisable by June 2, 2014. For this report, the appropriate congressional defense committees are the Committee on 

Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select 

Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and the Committee on 

Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

Limitation on availability of funds for collaborative cybersecurity 

activities with China 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 936) that would prevent appropriated funds to be used for collaborative cybersecurity 

activities with the People’s Republic of China. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

Small business cybersecurity solutions office 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 937) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress on 

the feasibility of establishing a small business cyber technology ofVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00658 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
627 

fice to assist small businesses in providing cybersecurity solutions 

to the Federal Government. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We recognize the challenges faced by the government in gaining 

access to truly innovative solutions for cybersecurity threats. Many 

of the most innovative technologies available to the government 

come from small businesses. However, it is also clear that the defense acquisition system, which can be difficult to navigate even for 

large businesses, can pose acute difficulties for small businesses to 

be able to find opportunities, respond effectively to lengthy contracting paperwork, and maintain compliance with arcane acquisition regulations. Within the Department of Defense, there exist offices for small and disadvantaged businesses which have been established to help support small businesses specifically to navigate 

these problems. We recognize the value these organizations already 

provide in supporting small businesses, and believe it would be redundant to create new offices to focus solely on cybersecurity solutions. 

Requirement to ensure sufficient levels of government oversight of 

functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 941) that would amend 

sections 129a and 2330a of title 10, United States Code, to ensure 

that sufficient levels of government oversight are in place for contracted services and aligns current Department of Defense policies 

related to Total Force Management. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

TITLE X—GENERAL PROVISIONS

BUDGET ITEM

Funding for New START Treaty preparatory activities 

The funding authorized by this Act would include funds for activities to prepare to implement nuclear force reductions to meet 

the levels prescribed by the New START Treaty. Elsewhere in this 

Act, a limitation is included that would ensure only preparatory activities for such reductions may be carried out in fiscal year 2014. 

Subtitle A—Financial Matters 

General transfer authority (sec. 1001) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1001) that would provide the Department of Defense with $3.5 billion of general transfer authority in fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1001) that would provide the Department of Defense with $4.0 

billion of general transfer authority in fiscal year 2014. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
628 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would provide the Department of Defense with $5.0 billion of general transfer authority in fiscal year 2014. 

Budgetary effects of this Act (sec. 1002) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1002) that would determine the budgetary effects of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 4). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Audit of Department of Defense fiscal year 2018 financial statements (sec. 1003) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1003) that would express the sense of Congress regarding the Department of Defense’s 

ongoing Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness process and 

support the goal of audit readiness across the Department by 2017. 

This section would also require that a full and complete audit takes 

place for fiscal year 2018. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a technical amendment. 

Authority to transfer funds to the National Nuclear Security Administration to sustain nuclear weapons modernization (sec. 1004) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1004) that would provide the Secretary of Defense the authority to transfer up to $150.0 

million to the nuclear weapons program of the National Nuclear 

Security Administration if the amount authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for that program is less than 

$8.4 billion (the amount specified for fiscal year 2014 in the report 

required by section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84)). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities 

Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia (sec. 1011) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1011) that would extend, by 1 year, the unified counter-drug and counterterrorism 

campaign in the Republic of Colombia originally authorized by section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375), and most recently 

amended by section 1013 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1011) that would extend, for 2 fiscal years, the authority of 

the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance to support the unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign of the Government of Colombia. The provision would also incorporate a notificaVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00660 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
629 

tion to Congress to improve transparency of the Department of Defense’s use of this authority. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would modify the extension of the underlying authority 

by 1 fiscal year and modify elements of the notification requirement. 

We note that the Government of Colombia has made and continues to make progress combating narcotics trafficking and designated foreign terrorist organizations. This type of flexible authority remains required to assist the Government of Colombia consolidate its hard-fought gains. 

Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law 

enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities 

(sec. 1012) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1012) that would extend, by 1 fiscal year, the support by joint task forces under section 

1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2004 (Public Law 108–136), as most recently amended by section 

1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2013 (Public Law 112–239). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1012) to extend by 2 fiscal years the support under section 

1022(b). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support 

for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments (sec. 

1013) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1013) that would extend, by 2 years, the authority to provide support for counter-drug 

activities of certain foreign governments, originally authorized by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85), and most recently amended by section 1006 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1013) that would extend, by 5 years, the authority to provide support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments 

under subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85), as most 

recently amended by section 1006 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81). The provision 

would also expand the list of countries eligible to receive support 

to include the Governments of Chad, Libya, Mali, and Niger. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would extend the underlying authority for 3 years and 

expand the list of countries eligible to receive support. 

We direct the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Counternarcotics and Global Threats (DASD CN/GT) to provide a briefing 

to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House 

of Representatives in fiscal year 2014 on the country plans associated with the four additional countries under this authority, including a description of the status of any assistance to be provided or 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
630 

planned to be provided, how the effectiveness of this assistance is 

to be measured, and how this assistance will reinforce other related 

Department of Defense activities in the region. The committee further directs the DASD CN/GT to submit a report updating the 

aforementioned committees on the status of these matters in fiscal 

year 2015. 

Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards 

Modification of requirements for annual long-range plan for the 

construction of naval vessels (sec. 1021) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1026) that would modify section 231 of title 10, United States Code, 

to include a requirement to report on the total cost of construction 

for each vessel used to determine estimated levels of annual funding in the report, and an assessment of the extent of the strategic 

and operational risk to national security whenever the number or 

capabilities of the naval vessels in the plan do not meet requirements. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical/ 

clarifying amendment. 

Clarification of sole ownership resulting from ship donations at no 

cost to the Navy (sec. 1022) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1021) would amend 

subsection (a) of section 7306 of title 10, United States Code, to 

clarify that ship donations would be only to operate the vessel as 

a museum or memorial for public display in the United States. 

This language would provide the Navy with the flexibility to oversee a vessel donee’s actions, without any implication that the Navy 

retains ownership of the vessel. The provision would also prevent 

the Federal Government from providing funding for any improvement, upgrade, modification, maintenance, preservation, or repair 

to a vessel donated under this section. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1024). 

The agreement includes this provision, but with modifications 

that would prevent the Department of Defense from providing additional funding for any donated vessel, not the Federal Government as a whole. These modifications would allow other federal departments to contribute to ship museums or ship memorials to the 

extent that the departments have authorization to do so. 

Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga 

class cruisers or dock landing ships (sec. 1023) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1022) that would limit 

the obligation and expenditure of funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the retirement, inactivation, or storage of a cruiser or dock landing ship. 

This section would provide an exception for the retirement of the 

U.S.S. Denver (LPD–9). The provision would also provide additional transfer authority for the purpose of providing sufficient appropriations to support the modernization of seven cruisers. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
631 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would delete the additional transfer authority. 

Extension and remediation of Navy contracting actions (sec. 1024) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1025) that would allow 

the Secretary of the Navy to extend or renew the lease of not more 

than four blocking vessels supporting the Transit Protection System Escort Program. The provision would also require the Secretary, prior to extending or renewing such a lease, to submit to 

the congressional defense committees a notification of the proposed 

extension or renewal, along with a detailed description of the term 

of the proposed contract and a justification for extending or renewing the lease, as opposed to obtaining the capability through purchase of such vessels. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would allow the Secretary of the Navy to accept and retain 

payment-in-kind in lieu of monetary payment for purposes of settling the litigation arising from the default termination on contract 

number N00019–88–C–0050 for development and production of the 

A–12 aircraft. Also, it is understood that the Secretary of the Navy 

is authorized to enter into agreements to modify contracts in order 

to effect a settlement to the litigation. 

Report comparing costs of DDG 1000 and DDG 51 Flight III ships 

(sec. 1025) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1026) that would require the Secretary of the Navy to submit to the congressional defense committees a report providing an updated comparison of the 

costs and risks of acquiring DDG–1000 and DDG–51 Flight III vessels equipped for enhanced ballistic missile defense capability. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical/ 

clarifying amendment. 

Report on naval vessels and the Force Structure Assessment (sec. 

1026) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1022) that would direct the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) to 

provide a report to the congressional defense committees no later 

than February 1, 2014, that would assess the current fleet capabilities compared to the threat and the likely situation over the next 

30 years. The CNO should produce an unclassified report, as well 

as a classified annex to that report. 

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 1024) that 

would express the sense of Congress that additional funding should 

be prioritized toward shipbuilding efforts and that Department of 

the Navy budget projections should realistically anticipate the true 

investment to meet force structure goals. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
632 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would add several items to the list of issues to be addressed in the report, including an assessment by the Commandant 

of the Marine Corps of: (1) The operational risk associated with the 

current and the planned number of ships of the amphibious assault 

force; and (2) The capabilities required to meet the needs of the 

Marine Corps for future ships of the amphibious assault force. The 

amendment would also delay the required date for the report until 

30 days after the Secretary of Defense submits the annual naval 

vessel construction plan required by section 231 of title 10, United 

States Code. 

Modification of policy relating to major combatant vessels of the 

strike forces of the Navy (sec. 1027) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1023) that would repeal section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181). That 

section requires that the Navy build any new class of major surface 

combatant and amphibious assault ship with an integrated nuclear 

power system, unless the Secretary of the Navy notifies the congressional defense committees that, as a result of a cost-benefit 

analysis, it would not be practical for the Navy to design the class 

of ships with an integrated nuclear power system. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would amend section 1021 to: (1) delete the requirement 

to include integrated nuclear power systems in any new ship class, 

and (2) add the requirement that the Navy analyze integrated nuclear power alternative in its analysis of alternatives for new ship 

classes, and report the results of that analysis in the budget request. 

Subtitle D—Counterterrorism 

Clarification of procedures for use of alternate members on military 

commissions (sec. 1031) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1030) that would 

amend chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to clarify the 

procedures for the convening authority to detail alternate members 

to a military commission. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1034). 

The agreement contains the House provision. 

Modification of Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship 

Program reporting requirement (sec. 1032) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1031) that would modify the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program 

to require additional annual reporting requirements. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
633 

Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the 

United States to house detainees transferred from United States 

Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1033) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1032) that would prohibit the use of Department of Defense (DOD) funds through December 31, 2014, to construct or modify facilities in the United 

States, its territories, or possessions, to house any detainee transferred from U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for the 

purposes of detention or imprisonment in DOD custody or control 

unless authorized by Congress. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo 

Bay, Cuba (sec. 1034) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1034) that would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to transfer or release 

any detainee at U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to or 

within the United States, its territories, or possessions through December 31, 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1033) that would prohibit the transfer or release of Guantanamo 

detainees to the United States during fiscal year 2014, except that 

the Secretary of Defense could authorize such a transfer for detention and trial if the Secretary determines that doing so would be 

in the U.S. national security interest and that appropriate actions 

have been or will be taken to address any public safety risks that 

could arise in connection with the transfer. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Transfers to foreign countries of individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (sec. 1035) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1033) that would restrict the Secretary of Defense from transferring or releasing individuals detained at U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

(GTMO) to a foreign country or foreign entity unless the Secretary 

makes certain specified certifications to Congress not later than 30 

days prior to any such transfer or release. The restrictions of this 

provision would apply through December 31, 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1031) that would authorize two procedures for the transfer or release of Guantanamo detainees to their country of origin or another 

country other than the United States. The first part of the provision would authorize such transfers or releases under certain specified circumstances, specifically: (1) If following a review by a Periodic Review Board, the detainee is determined to no longer be a 

threat to U.S. national security; (2) In order to effectuate a court 

order; or (3) If a detainee has been tried and acquitted or tried, 

convicted, and has served his sentence. The second part of the provision would allow the Secretary of Defense to authorize the transfer of Guantanamo detainees overseas only if he determines, following a rigorous assessment of a number of specified factors, that 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
634 

doing so would be in the U.S. national security interest and steps 

have been or will be taken to mitigate the risk of recidivism by the 

individual to be transferred. The provision would require the Secretary of Defense to notify Congress of a determination to transfer 

or release a Guantanamo detainee not later than 30 days prior to 

the transfer or release, and specifies the information that must be 

provided as part of such notifications. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would: 

(a) narrow the specified circumstances under which transfers 

or releases are authorized under the first part of the provision 

to only (1) and (2) above; 

(b) expand the factors that the Secretary of Defense must 

specifically evaluate and consider in making his determination 

whether to transfer a Guantanamo detainee overseas, including the security situation in the country to which the detainee 

would be transferred, the presence of foreign terrorist groups 

in the recipient country, whether the recipient country is a 

state sponsor of terrorism, and whether the detainee has been 

tried and acquitted or tried, convicted, and completed his sentence; and 

(c) expand the information that must be included in the congressional notification provided not later than 30 days prior to 

the transfer, including information on any actions taken to address the risk of reengagement by the detainee in terrorist activities, a copy of any Periodic Review Board findings, an assessment of the capacity of the receiving country, and a description of the Secretary of Defense’s evaluation of the factors 

to be considered in making the Secretary’s determination in 

support of the transfer. 

Report on information relating to individuals detained at Parwan, 

Afghanistan (sec. 1036) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1035) that would require the public disclosure of an unclassified summary of certain 

information relating to individuals held at the Detention Facility in 

Parwan, Afghanistan, that have been designated as enduring security threats to the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a classified report containing certain specified information relating to detainees at Parwan that have been designated as enduring security threats. The Secretary would also be required to review the classified report to determine what summary information, 

if any, can be declassified and made publicly available, to the maximum extent practicable consistent with national security. 

Grade of chief prosecutor and chief defense counsel in military commissions established to try individuals detained at Guantanamo (sec. 1037) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1038) that would require that, for purposes of any military commission trial of an indiVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00666 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
635 

vidual detained at the U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, 

the chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor must have the 

same rank. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require that for purposes of any such military commission trial, the chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor must 

have the same grade. The amendment would also provide that the 

Secretary of Defense may temporarily waive this requirement if the 

Secretary determines that compliance with the requirement either 

would be infeasible due to the non-availability of qualified officers 

of the same grade to fill the billets or would cause significant disruption to the trial proceedings. The amendment would also require the Secretary of Defense to issue guidance to ensure that the 

offices of the chief defense counsel and the chief prosecutor receive 

equitable resources, personnel support, and logistical support for 

conducting their duties in connection with any such military commission trial. We note that the intent of this requirement is to ensure fairness and impartiality in the resources and support provided to each of these offices. 

Report on capability of Yemeni government to detain, rehabilitate, 

and prosecute individuals detained at Guantanamo who are 

transferred to Yemen (sec. 1038) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1039) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to jointly 

submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, a report on the capability of the Republic of Yemen to detain, rehabilitate, and prosecute individuals transferred there from U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Report on attachment of rights to individuals detained at Guantanamo if transferred to the United States (sec. 1039) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General to jointly 

submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives, a report on whether detainees, if transferred to the United 

States from the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility, would become 

eligible for certain legal rights by reason of their transfer. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committees 

on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives, 

a report on the legal rights, if any, for which a Guantanamo detainee, if transferred to the United States, may become eligible, by 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
636 

reason of such transfer. The report would also include an analysis 

of the extent to which legislation or other steps could address any 

such legal rights. 

Subtitle E—Sensitive Military Operations 

Congressional notification of sensitive military operations (sec. 

1041) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1041) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees notice in writing of any sensitive military operation following such operation. This section would also require the 

Secretary of Defense to establish procedures not later than 60 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act for providing such notice 

in a manner consistent with the national security of the United 

States and the protection of operational integrity. 

The Senate committee-passed bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Counterterrorism operational briefings (sec. 1042) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1043) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide quarterly briefings to the 

congressional defense committees outlining Department of Defense 

counterterrorism operations and related activities. Each briefing 

would include: a global update on activity within each geographic 

combatant command; an overview of authorities and legal issues 

including limitations; an outline of interagency activities and initiatives; and any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would: (1) modify the elements required as part of the briefings and (2) repeal section 1031 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81)—a nearly identical requirement. 

Report on process for determining targets of lethal or capture operations (sec. 1043) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1042) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report within 60 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act containing an explanation of the legal and policy considerations and approval processes 

used in determining whether an individual or group of individuals 

could be the target of a lethal operation or capture operation conducted by the Armed Forces of the United States outside the 

United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would provide 90 days for the Secretary of Defense to provide 

the required report and make a number of technical modifications. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
637 

Subtitle F—Nuclear Forces 

Notification required for reduction or consolidation of dual-capable 

aircraft based in Europe (sec. 1051) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1053) that would provide that funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available may not be used to reduce or consolidate U.S. 

dual-capable aircraft in Europe until 90 days after the Secretary of 

Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the 

Russian Federation has carried out similar actions; the Secretary 

has consulted with the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization (NATO) about the proposed action with respect to 

U.S. dual capable aircraft; and, there is a consensus among NATO 

member states in support of such action. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

replacing the provisions with a sense of Congress regarding reductions or consolidations of dual-capable aircraft. The amendment 

also requires a notification 90 days before the date on which the 

Secretary reduces or consolidates dual capable aircraft that includes the reason for the reduction or consolidation, any effects 

from such action on the extended deterrence mission of the United 

States, the manner in which the military requirements of the 

NATO will be met following such actions, a statement by the Secretary on the response of NATO to such actions, and whether there 

is any change in the force posture of Russia from such actions including nonstrategic nuclear weapons. 

Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System (sec. 1052) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

903) that would establish a council to coordinate activities related 

to national leadership command, control, and communications systems, including the nuclear command, control, and communications 

system. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would change the co-chairs of the Council to the Under 

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the 

Vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and would add the Director of the National Security Agency to the Council. The amendment requires an annual report by the Commander, U.S. Strategic 

Command, through the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on 

the adequacy of the President’s budget to meet required capabilities of the nuclear command and control communications system 

for national leadership of the United States and the impact, if any, 

if annual appropriations do not meet the President’s budget request. The amendment would also seek to add more transparency 

to the budget for Nuclear Command and Control activities. A clerical amendment is made transferring a provision from 10 U.S.C. 

491 regarding anomalies in the Nuclear Command and Control system to this new provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
638 

Modification of responsibilities and reporting requirements of Nuclear Weapons Council (sec. 1053) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1041) that would amend section 179 of title 10, United States Code, 

by striking the responsibilities for nuclear command, control, and 

communications since another section of this Act establishes a 

Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System. The Senate committee-reported 

bill also contained a provision adding a new requirement to report 

on joint activities between the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy on nuclear security. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that clarifies the nature of the joint report by the Department 

of Defense and the Department of Energy. We believe the information required to be provided in this joint report should be substantially similar as that provided in the Joint Surety Report pursuant 

to National Security Presidential Directive 28. 

Modification of deadline for report on plan for nuclear weapons 

stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery 

systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system 

(sec. 1054) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1042) that would amend section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2012 (Public Law 112–81), which 

provides for a report to the congressional defense committees with 

a 10–year funding profile for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) 

and the Department of Defense’s (DOD) strategic deterrent modernization program. Specifically, the provision would give both departments 60 days after budget submission to deliver the section 

1043 report. If a delay is anticipated that is greater than 60 days, 

DOE and DOD must notify the congressional defense committees 

before the President’s budget submission and provide a briefing no 

later than 30 days after budget submission. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would move the report deadline to 30 days after the 

President’s budget submission. The amendment would also provide 

that, if it is determined that the report submission will require 

longer than 30 days, a briefing will be provided to the congressional defense committees within 30 days after submission of the 

budget request. Regardless of any such determination or briefing, 

the report would be required to be submitted no later than 60 days 

after submission of the budget request. 

Prohibition on elimination of nuclear triad (sec. 1055) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1051) that would prohibit any of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or 

otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department 

of Defense from being obligated or expended to reduce, convert, or 

decommission any strategic delivery system of the United States if 

such reduction, conversion, or decommissioning would eliminate a 

leg of the nuclear triad. This section defines ‘‘nuclear triad’’ as: (1) 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
639 

land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles; (2) submarinelaunched ballistic missiles and their associated ballistic missile 

submarines; and (3) nuclear-certified strategic bombers. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

containing technical corrections. 

Implementation of New START Treaty (sec. 1056) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

132) that would amend section 131(a)(1) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (P.L. 109– 

364) by striking the term in a common capability configuration. 

The House bill (section 241) contained a provision that requires 

the Secretary of Defense to keep each Minuteman III silo as of the 

date of enactment of this Act in a warm status and that it remains 

a functioning element of the missile field and can be made functional with a deployed missile. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1045) that states the Secretary of Defense may, in a manner 

consistent with international obligations, retain missile launch facilities currently supporting up to 800 deployed and non-deployed 

strategic launchers, maintain intercontinental ballistic missiles 

(ICBM) on alert or operationally deployed status, and preserve 

ICBM silos in operational or warm status. 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1052) that would provide that none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense or the National Nuclear Security Administration 

may be obligated or expended to carry out reductions to the nuclear 

forces of the United States required by the New START Treaty 

until the Secretary of Defense provides the plan required by section 

1042(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 

2012 (Public Law 112–81) and the President certifies that any reductions to U.S. nuclear forces below the level required by the New 

START Treaty will be carried out only pursuant to a treaty or 

international agreement approved according to the Treaty Clause 

of the Constitution of the United States or an affirmative act of 

Congress. 

The agreement includes a provision that would authorize the use 

of fiscal year 2014 funds for the purpose of preparing to implement 

reductions in nuclear forces necessary to meet the levels required 

by the New START Treaty subject to additional limitations as 

found in subsection (b) of the agreement. The agreement requires 

the Secretary of Defense to include with the defense budget materials a consolidated budget justification display that covers each activity associated with implementation of the New START Treaty. 

Subsection (b) of the provision would limit amounts spent for an 

environmental assessment for any proposed reduction in ICBM 

silos to 50 percent subject to receiving the nuclear force structure 

plan required by section 1042(a) of the Fiscal Year 2012 National 

Defense Authorization Act, which is unacceptably almost 2 full 

years late. That plan would be required to include the various options under consideration for treaty implementation, along with a 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
640 

preferred final force structure option, which may be modified upon 

the conclusion of the environmental assessment. That plan would 

be accompanied by a report from the Commander of U.S. Strategic 

Command on his assessment of the force structure options provided 

by the Secretary of Defense, including the preferred final force 

structure option. Lastly, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 

would be required to certify to the congressional defense committees that conducting the environmental assessment will not imperil 

the ability of the military to comply with the deployed or non-deployed force levels of the New START Treaty by February 2018. 

The agreement would prohibit the conversion of nuclear capable 

B–52 aircraft to conventional aircraft until the information required under subsection (b) is submitted, and requires that all B– 

52s in the inventory remain in a common conventional weapons 

employment capability configuration once nuclear decertification 

and modification commences for currently an undetermined quantity of B–52 aircraft. 

The agreement would further require a report on collaboration 

between the Army, Navy, and Air Force on activities related to 

strategic systems to improve efficiencies, technology sharing, and 

other benefits. 

The agreement would also express a sense of the Congress that 

the force structure required by the New START Treaty should preserve Minuteman III ballistic missile silos in a warm status and 

any non-deployed missiles and silos should be spread amongst the 

three missile wings in the Air Force ICBM force. 

Finally, the agreement would also include, in another section of 

this report accompanying section 4201, an explanatory statement 

on the budget for activities to prepare for the implementation of 

the New START Treaty. 

Retention of capability to redeploy multiple independently targetable 

reentry vehicles (sec. 1057) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1056) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to ensure that the Air Force 

is capable of deploying multiple independently targetable reentry 

vehicles to Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles 

(ICBM) and any ground-based strategic deterrent follow-on to such 

missiles. This section would require the Secretary to ensure that 

the Air Force is capable of commencing such deployment not later 

than 270 days after the date on which the President determines 

such deployment is necessary. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that changes the 270 days to 180 days and narrows the requirement to apply only to the Minuteman III ICBM system. 

Report on New START Treaty (sec. 1058) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1059) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of 

Staff to jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and 

the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, a report on 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
641 

whether the New START Treaty is in the national security interests of the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Report on implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares 

Nuclear Weapons Accident Revised Dose Evaluation Report 

(sec. 1059) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080A) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to report on the implementation of the recommendations of the Palomares Nuclear Weapons 

Accident Dose Evaluation Report released by the Air Force in April 

2001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would modify the deadline for the report from 180 days to 1 

year. 

Sense of Congress on further strategic nuclear arms reductions with 

the Russian Federation (sec. 1060) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1054) that would provide a statement of policy concerning implementation of further nuclear arms reductions below the levels of the New START Treaty, 

and would limit funds to make such reductions unless certain conditions are met. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would express the sense 

of Congress that, if the United States seeks further strategic nuclear arms reductions with the Russian Federation that are below 

the levels of the New START Treaty, such reductions should: (1) 

Be pursued through a mutually negotiated agreement; (2) Be 

verifiable; (3) Be pursued through the treaty-making power of the 

President; and (4) Take into account the full range of nuclear weapon capabilities that threaten the United States and its allies, including non-strategic nuclear weapon capabilities. 

Sense of Congress on compliance with nuclear arms control treaty 

obligations (sec. 1061) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1055) that would express the sense of Congress that the President should consider not 

seeking further nuclear arms reductions with a foreign country 

that is in noncompliance with its nuclear arms control treaty obligations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would express the sense 

of Congress that, if the President determines that a foreign nation 

is in substantial noncompliance with its nuclear arms control treaty obligations in a manner that adversely affects the national security of the United States or its allies or alliances, the President 

should take certain specified steps. These steps include informing 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
642 

Congress of the President’s assessment of the effect of such noncompliance and the President’s plans to resolve such noncompliance. They also include considering whether, in light of the noncompliance, the United States should engage in future nuclear 

arms control negotiations with the noncompliant government, and 

considering the potential effect of the noncompliance on the consideration by the Senate of a future nuclear arms reduction treaty 

with the noncompliant government. 

Senses of Congress on ensuring the modernization of the nuclear 

forces of the United States (sec. 1062) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1044) that states it is the policy of the United States to modernize 

the nuclear triad and sustain the nuclear stockpile, its production 

facilities, and science base, and a sense of Congress expressing that 

Congress is committed to providing the resources needed for this 

modernization and that Congress supports the modernization or replacement of the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes an amendment that includes an additional sense of Congress supporting continued upgrades of the existing B–1B, B–2, and B–52 bomber aircraft, and that the Air Force 

should continue to prioritize the continued development and acquisition of the long-range strike bomber program. 

Subtitle G—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations 

Enhancement of capacity of the United States Government to analyze captured records (sec. 1071) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1061) that would provide the statutory authority to the Secretary of Defense to establish 

a Conflict Records Research Center to facilitate research and analysis of records captured from countries, organizations, and individuals, now or once hostile, to the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision, but recommended funding of the current center, which already exists at the National Defense University, for $1 million in 

the budget request for fiscal year 2014. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note that while such a center currently exists, additional 

statutory authorization would allow the center to be funded collectively by the Department of Defense, the Office of the Director of 

National Intelligence, and other departments and agencies, rather 

than rely on discrete partner funding for each activity. This authorization would also allow the center to receive funding from other 

agencies, states, or other foreign and domestic entities, including 

academic and philanthropic organizations, to support important research in international relations, counterterrorism, conventional 

warfare and unconventional warfare. 

Strategic plan for the management of the electromagnetic spectrum 

(sec. 1072) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1051) that would require a national security spectrum strategy to 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
643 

be performed at least once every 5 years. The strategy is to provide 

near-term (5 years), mid-term (10 years), and long-term (30 years) 

assessments of the need for national security spectrum. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment to title 10 of the United States Code, section 488, ‘‘Management of Electromagnetic spectrum: biennial strategic plan,’’ that requires the plan be submitted in consultation with the Director of 

National Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce. The plan 

shall include an inventory of the electromagnetic spectrum uses for 

national security and other purposes, an estimate of the need for 

electromagnetic spectrum over the time periods of the Senate committee-reported provision, and any additional matters the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce, considers appropriate. 

Extension of authority to provide military transportation services to 

certain other agencies at the Department of Defense reimbursement rate (sec. 1073) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1062) that would 

amend section 2642(a) of title 10, United States Code, to extend the 

authority to provide to other federal agencies airlift transportation 

at the same rate the Department of Defense (DOD) charges its own 

units for similar transportation and to expand the authority to include all means of transportation, not just airlift. The DOD currently uses this authority to: (1) provide transportation support to 

other departments and agencies to increase peacetime business, 

and (2) promote the improved use of airlift by filling excess capacity with paying cargo. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 313). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Notification of modifications to Army force structure (sec. 1074) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1063) that would prevent the Department of the Army from spending any fiscal year 

2014 funds to modify the force structure or basing strategy of the 

Army until the Secretary of the Army submits the report required 

by section 1066 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1943). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement would require the Secretary of the Army to certify that Army force structure changes authorized as of the date of 

the enactment of this Act comply with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

The provision would also require that as part of any congressional 

notifications of future force structure changes, in accordance with 

section 993 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary should include an assessment whether or not such changes require an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
644 

Aircraft joint training (sec. 1075) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1065) that would require the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 

to develop and implement plans and procedures to review the potential of joint testing and evaluation of unmanned aircraft equipment and systems with other appropriate departments and agencies of the Federal Government that may serve the dual purpose 

of providing capabilities to the Department of Defense (DOD) to 

meet the future requirements of combatant commanders and, domestically, to strengthen international border security. The two 

secretaries and the Administrator would also be required to submit 

a report on the status of the plans within 270 days of the date of 

enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would express the sense of Congress that simulators offer cost 

savings to DOD, can contribute to training members of the armed 

services for combat, and highlights the need for synergy between 

the DOD and private sector. 

Subtitle H—Studies and Reports 

Online availability of reports submitted to Congress (sec. 1081) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1078) that would 

amend section 122a of title 10, United States Code, to require certain unclassified reports be made available on a publicly accessible 

website of the Department of Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a technical amendment. 

Oversight of combat support agencies (sec. 1082) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1071) that would require that assessments of combat support agencies undertaken pursuant to section 193(a) of title 10, United States Code, be submitted to the congressional defense committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Inclusion in annual report of description of interagency coordination relating to humanitarian demining technology (sec. 1083) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1072) that would modify current reporting requirements for humanitarian demining as 

defined within section 407(d) of title 10, United States Code, to include interagency, research, and development activities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
645 

Repeal and modification of reporting requirements (sec. 1084) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1061) that would repeal or modify a number of reporting requirements that have been included in law in past years. The requirements recommended for repeal or modification in this provision are 

requirements identified by the committee as being no longer relevant or necessary and that can be repealed or modified without 

adversely affecting the committee’s oversight responsibilities. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying amendment. 

Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General assessment of Department of Defense efficiencies (sec. 1085) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1074) that would repeal section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81), relating to the implementation of the efficiencies undertaken in 2010 by the Department of 

Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision. 

Review and assessment of United States Special Operations Forces 

and United States Special Operations Command (sec. 1086) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1076) that would require the Secretary of Defense to review and assess the organization, missions, and authorities related to U.S. Special Operations 

Forces and U.S. Special Operations Command and to provide a report to the congressional defense committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Reports on unmanned aircraft systems (sec. 1087) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1077) that would require the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Transportation, the 

Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 

on behalf of the Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Executive Committee, to jointly submit a report on unmanned aircraft system collaboration, demonstration, use cases and data sharing to the appropriate committees of Congress within 90 days after the date of the 

enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would extend the reporting deadline to 180 days after the date 

of the enactment of this Act. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
646 

Report on foreign language support contracts for the Department of 

Defense (sec. 1088) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1063) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to assess the Department’s current approach for managing foreign language support contracts. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

We note that at a minimum, the assessment shall include an 

analysis of spending for all the types of foreign language support 

services and products that have been acquired by the Department 

of Defense (DOD) components. Additionally, the assessment shall 

include a reevaluation, based on the results of the analysis of 

spending, of the scope of the DOD executive agent’s management 

of foreign language support contracts to determine whether any adjustments are needed. 

Civil Air Patrol (sec. 1089) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1064) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to produce 

a report on the Civil Air Patrol (CAP) that would, among other 

things, identify the requirement for the total fleet of CAP aircraft. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle I—Other Matters 

Technical and clerical amendments (sec. 1091) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1081) that would make 

a number of technical and clerical amendments of a non-substantive nature to existing law. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Reduction in costs to report critical changes to major automated information system programs (sec. 1092) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1083) that would give 

Department of Defense senior officials responsible for major automated information system programs the option of submitting to the 

congressional defense committees either a critical change report 

when required, or a streamlined notification when the official further concludes that the critical change occurred primarily due to 

congressional action, such as a reduction in program funding. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying amendment. 

Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue nonpremium aviation insurance (sec. 1093) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1084) that would 

amend section 44310 of title 49, United States Code, relating to the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
647 

expiration of non-premium insurance under chapter 443 of that 

title, to extend the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to 

provide insurance and reinsurance. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Extension of Ministry of Defense Advisor Program and authority to 

waive reimbursement of costs of activities for certain nongovernmental personnel (sec. 1094) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1073) that would modify section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81), to extend the deadline for the 

required report of the Comptroller General of the United States 

from December 30, 2013, to December 30, 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision that 

would modify section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) to extend the authority of the Secretary of Defense to advise foreign defense ministries 

for an additional 5 fiscal years. The provision would also extend the 

requirement of the Secretary of Defense to provide an annual report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives, and would provide the Comptroller General of the United States an additional year to conduct the evaluation of the effectiveness of the program under the original authority. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would extend the program through the end of fiscal year 

2017. The agreement also extends, for 1 fiscal year, the authority 

of the Secretary of Defense to waive the reimbursement of costs requirement for certain nongovernmental personnel at the Department of Defense regional centers for security studies (as most recently amended section 941(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009). 

Amendments to certain national commissions (sec. 1095) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1085) that would enable parity for compensation and ethics workday computations by 

decreasing and making optional the annual compensation rate for 

commissioners appointed to the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force that was established in subtitle G of title III 

of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 

(Public Law 112–239). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would make various technical changes to the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission, enacted in 

sections 671 through 680 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), including additional authorities for the Commission, extended timelines and milestones, 

and increased funding. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
648 

Strategy for future military information operations capabilities (sec. 

1096) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1087) that would require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a strategy 

for developing and sustaining military information operations capabilities for future contingencies. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Sense of Congress on collaboration on border security (sec. 1097) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1090) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to coordinate with the Secretary 

of Homeland Security on the transfer or long-term loan to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of excess Department of Defense (DOD) equipment that may be appropriate for use in efforts 

related to improving U.S. border security. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would express the sense 

of Congress that DOD and DHS should, consistent with existing 

laws and authorities, seek to collaborate on enhanced U.S. border 

security, including by identifying excess property of DOD, if any, 

that may be suitable for use by the DHS to support border security 

efforts. We believe such collaboration could be useful to increase 

situational awareness and to help achieve operational control of the 

international borders of the United States. 

Transfer of aircraft to other departments for wildfire suppression 

and other purposes; tactical airlift fleet of the Air Force (sec. 

1098) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

131) that would require the Secretary of the Air Force to consider, 

as part of the recapitalization of the tactical airlift fleet of the Air 

Force: (1) Upgrades to legacy C–130H aircraft designed to help 

such aircraft meet the fuel economy goals of the Air Force; and (2) 

Retention of such upgraded aircraft in the tactical airlift fleet. It 

would also require that the Secretary ensure that upgrades to the 

C–130H fleet are made in a manner that is proportional to the 

number of C–130H aircraft in the force structure of the active Air 

Force, the Air Force Reserve, and the Air National Guard. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would add direction that: (1) The Secretary of the Army 

offer to transfer eight specific C–23Bs to the Governor of Alaska; 

(2) The Secretary of Defense transfer up to 15 C–23Bs to the Forest 

Service; (3) The Coast Guard transfer seven C–130s to the Air 

Force; (4) The Air Force modify the Coast Guard C–130s to serve 

as firefighting tanker aircraft for the Forest Service; and (5) The 

Secretary of Defense transfer 14 C–27J aircraft to the Coast Guard 

upon completion of these actions. 

We also direct the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary 

of the Army to provide the Committees on Armed Services of the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
649 

Senate and the House of Representatives, not later than January 

30, 2014, a quarterly report or briefing on the cost, schedule, and 

execution of notable events related to the aircraft transfers and 

modifications required within the provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Department of Defense Readiness Restoration Fund 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1002) that would establish a Department of Defense (DOD) Readiness Restoration Fund in order to provide the DOD with increased 

flexibility to transfer funds that may be available to high priority 

readiness accounts, where necessary to address significant shortfalls in funding otherwise available for the training activities of the 

armed forces (including flying hours and steaming days) and the 

maintenance of military equipment. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the reductions in discretionary appropriations and 

direct spending accounts under section 251A of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901a) were 

never intended to take effect, the readiness of the Nation’s military 

is weakened by sequestration, sequestration has budgetary and 

cost impacts beyond the programmatic level, and there is limited 

information about these indirect costs to the Federal Government. 

It is the sense of Congress that the Government Accountability Office should report on the long-term budgetary costs and effects of 

sequestration, including on procurement activities and contracts 

with the Federal Government. 

Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Counter-Narcotic 

Program 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1014) that would express the sense of Congress regarding the importance of the National Guard Counterdrug Program (CDP) as a tool in combating 

drug trafficking into the United States and the need for continued 

support and funding of such programs, especially along the Southwest border. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the Department of Defense requests funding annually to support the National Guard CDP. We believe that the CDP 

plays an important role in providing military-specific capabilities 

and expertise resident within the National Guard to support the 

counterdrug activities of federal, state, and local authorities. We 

believe this support has proven effective in helping to meet national counterdrug objectives. 

Repair of vessels in foreign shipyards 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1023) that would 

amend section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, to require that 

naval vessels that do not have a designated homeport to be treated 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
650 

as homeported in the United States or Guam, and to change the 

definition of voyage repair. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We direct the Secretary of the Navy, not later than June 30, 

2014, to submit to the congressional defense committees a report 

on ship repair capabilities in Guam—including skilled personnel, 

equipment, and facilities—in support of Department of the Navy 

capabilities needed to sustain United States naval forces readiness 

in the Guam region. 

Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United 

States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United 

States for emergency or critical medical treatment 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1032) that would provide the Secretary of Defense the authority to 

temporarily transfer individuals detained at the Guantanamo detention facility (GTMO) to a Department of Defense medical facility 

for the sole purpose of providing emergency or critical medical 

treatment if such treatment is not available at GTMO and is necessary to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to 

the individual’s health. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Assessment of affiliates and adherents of Al-Qaeda outside the 

United States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1036) that would require an assessment of any group operating outside the United 

States that is an affiliate or adherent of, or otherwise related to, 

Al Qaeda; a summary of relevant information relating to each such 

group; an assessment of whether each group is part of or substantially supporting Al Qaeda or the Taliban, or constitutes an associated force that is engaged in hostilities against the United States 

or its coalition partners; and the criteria used to determine the nature and extent of each group’s relationship to Al Qaeda. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense, not later than 120 days after 

the enactment of this Act, to provide a briefing to the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

that provides definitions and the processes to determine if an entity is an affiliate, associated force and/or an adherent of al Qaeda 

or the Taliban; and an assessment of the groups or entities that the 

Department considers to be affiliates or adherents of al Qaeda. 

In consultation with the committees of jurisdiction over the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 110–40), we direct 

the Secretary of State to provide the same briefing to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives on the aforementioned matters. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
651 

Designation of Department of Defense senior official for facilitating 

the transfer of individuals detained at United States Naval 

Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1037) that would require the Secretary of Defense to designate a senior official within 

the Department of Defense (DOD) with principal responsibility for 

the coordination and management of the transfer of individuals detained at U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We note that the 

Secretary of Defense appointed the senior DOD official responsible 

for coordinating and managing transfers of Guantanamo detainees 

in October 2013. 

Summary of information relating to individuals detained at Guantanamo who became leaders of foreign terrorist groups 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040A) that would require the public release of summary information on individuals formerly detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, 

Cuba, who have, since being transferred or released from such detention, become leaders or involved in the leadership structure of 

a foreign terrorist group. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Procedures governing United States citizens apprehended inside the 

United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military 

Force 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040B) that would affirm the availability of the writ of habeas corpus for any U.S. citizen apprehended inside the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 

1541 note), and set out certain procedural requirements for any habeas proceeding brought by such a U.S. citizen. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Prohibition on the use of funds for recreational facilities for individuals detained at Guantanamo 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040C) that would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to provide additional 

or upgraded recreational facilities for individuals detained at 

United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Prohibition on transfer or release of individuals detained at Guantanamo to Yemen 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1040D) that would prohibit the use of Department of Defense funds to transfer, release, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
652 

or assist in the transfer or release, of any individual detained at 

Guantanamo to the Republic of Yemen or any entity within Yemen 

during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act 

and ending on December 31, 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Department of Defense representation in dispute resolution regarding surrender of Department of Defense bands of electromagnetic frequencies 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1052) that would amend section 1062(b)(1) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65) to require that the Department of Defense be adequately represented to 

convey its views with the interagency process for spectrum allocation. 

The House bill contained no similar amendment. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Assessment of nuclear weapons program of the People’s Republic of 

China 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1057) that would 

amend section 1045(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to extend the date of the 

required assessment until August 15, 2014. The section would also 

provide not more than 75 percent of the funds made available to 

the Office of the Secretary of Defense for travel may be obligated 

or expended until 30 days after the Secretary notifies the appropriate congressional committees that the assessment has begun. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Subsequent to passage by the House of H.R. 1960, the Department of Defense entered into a contract with the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) to carry out the requirement of section 

1045(b). We have been informed that IDA was given notice to proceed on this work on September 18, 2013, and will be required to 

submit to the Department its draft report on July 1, 2014, with a 

formal final report to be submitted by August 29, 2014. We look 

forward to the report assembled by IDA and its panel of independent experts. 

Cost estimates for nuclear weapons 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1058) that would 

amend section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) to include in the annual 

report required by such section a detailed estimate of the personnel 

costs associated with sustaining and modernizing the nuclear deterrent and nuclear weapons stockpile of the United States. The 

annual report would also be required to describe how and which locations were included in the cost estimate. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
653 

Report on plans for the disposition of the Mine Resistant Ambush 

Protected vehicle fleet 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1062) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report on the Department’s analysis and plans for the disposition and 

sustainment of its fleet of Mine Resistant Ambush Protected 

(MRAP) vehicles. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Limitation on use of funds for public-private cooperation activities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1064) that would prohibit the obligation or expenditure of funds for any public-private 

cooperation activity by a combatant command until the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives 

receive the Defense Business Board report that the Secretary of 

Defense was directed to provide under the committee report accompanying H.R. 4310 of the 112th Congress (H. Rept. 112–479). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We note that the 

specified report was received by the committees in October 2013. 

We encourage the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the proper 

guidance and procedures are in place for such public-private cooperation activities by the combatant commands and to consult regularly with the committees regarding the proper scope and implementation of such activities. 

Matters for inclusion in the assessment of the 2013 Quadrennial Defense Review 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1075) that would require the National Defense Panel (NDP) established pursuant to 

subsection 118(f) of title 10, United States Code, to assess the recommendation of the 2009 Quadrennial Defense Review Independent Panel (QDRIP), to establish a standing, independent strategic review panel. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Under the provisions of section 118(f)(9)(A) of title 10, United 

States Code, the heads of departments and agencies of the Department of Defense are required, upon request, to cooperate with the 

NDP to ensure that information it considers necessary to carry out 

its duties is promptly provided to the maximum extent practical. It 

is particularly important for the NDP to have access, upon request, 

to information, including appropriate access to previous studies, 

data, assumptions, scenarios, analysis, and recommendations related to the Department’s series of recent strategy and program reviews such as the Defense Strategic Guidance, Strategic Choices 

and Management Review, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of 

Staff Risk Assessment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
654 

Provision of defense planning guidance and contingency operation 

plan information to Congress 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1079) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide to the congressional defense committees an annual report containing summaries of the 

Secretary’s defense planning guidance and guidance to the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff for contingency operation plans. This 

provision would also prohibit the obligation or expenditure of 75 

percent of the funds, authorized to be appropriated for operation 

and maintenance, defense-wide, for the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense, until the Secretary of Defense submits the first report. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Last year’s statement of managers to accompany the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239) directs the Secretary of Defense, upon request, to provide the 

congressional defense committees with a briefing that describes the 

defense planning guidance, as required by section 113 of title 10, 

United States Code, and from which the budget request submitted 

was developed. Such a briefing is particularly important now given 

the significant changes in the strategic and fiscal plans currently 

under consideration by the Department. For this reason we expect 

the Department to provide the required briefing, upon request, 

with regard to existing defense policy guidance used for the Department’s fiscal year 2014 budget request. This briefing will serve 

as a baseline to help the committees understand any changes to 

the guidance that may be adopted in the course of the current review and to assist with the oversight and assessment of any subsequent strategic or budgetary changes. 

Report on U.S. citizens subject to military detention 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide an annual report on U.S. 

citizens subject to military detention. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Report on long-term costs of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1080B) that would require the President to submit to Congress a report containing an 

estimate of the previous costs of Operation New Dawn and the 

long-term costs of Operation Enduring Freedom. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Report on air transportation of supplies for the United States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1082) that would: (1) 

Modify section 2631a of title 10, United States Code, to provide a 

preference for Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) aircraft for the transportation of Department of Defense (DOD) supplies; (2) Require the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
655 

DOD to submit an annual report regarding use of outsize and oversize cargo flights; and (3) Amend chapter 401 of title 49, United 

States Code, to direct at least 50 percent of the gross tonnage of 

the equipment, materials, or commodities that are procured, contracted, or subcontracted for by the U.S. Government to be transported by CRAF aircraft. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We agree that the Secretary of Defense should provide a report 

to the congressional defense committees within 180 days of enactment of this Act that includes assessments of the following: 

(1) The effects on CRAF carriers of section 41106 of title 49, 

United States Code, and that section’s ability to help the Secretary of Defense support the goals of the National Airlift Policy and maintain an adequate industrial base for CRAF carriers; 

(2) The percentages of the gross tonnage of the equipment, 

materials, or commodities transported on fixed wing aircraft 

broken out by organic airlift and specific commercial carriers; 

(4) The volume of outsize and oversize cargo flights, to include requirements and procedures; 

(5) The ability of CRAF carriers to meet requirements to 

transport any equipment, materials, or commodities for the use 

of U.S. military operations and respond to a humanitarian disaster; and 

(6) Current waiver authorities and whether there is any 

need to change those authorities to help the Secretary of Defense support the goals of the National Airlift Policy and maintain an adequate industrial base for CRAF carriers. 

Transportation of supplies to members of the Armed Forces from 

nonprofit organizations 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1082A) that would insert a new section after section 402 in title 10, United States Code, 

to allow the Secretary of Defense to transport, on a space available 

basis and without charge, supplies that have been furnished by a 

nonprofit organization and that are intended for distribution to 

members of the armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

The Secretary of Defense informed us that he already has the authority to accept donations and gifts for the benefit of our armed 

forces, but that the Department of Defense has very limited resources to receive, screen, and transport donations and gifts. 

Protection of tier one task critical assets from electromagnetic pulse 

and high-powered microwave systems 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1086) that would require the Secretary of Defense to certify to the congressional defense committees that certain defense critical assets are protected 

from the adverse effects of electromagnetic pulses (EMP) and highpowered microwave (HPM) systems, and to prepare a plan to enVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00687 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
656 

sure protected electrical power for any such assets that are not certified. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We note that the Department of Defense (DOD) has in place 

well-documented policies and practices for the protection of defense 

critical infrastructure against a wide variety of potential threats 

and hazards. This all-hazards risk mitigation and protection approach covers both natural phenomena and man-made hazards and 

attacks, including EMP and potential electrical power disruption, 

and considers both the probability and severity of potential hazards. 

The Department’s Defense Critical Infrastructure Protection 

(DCIP) program is focused on mission assurance to meet DOD 

needs. It performs recurring analyses of infrastructure vulnerability and risk mitigation options to reduce vulnerability and enhance mission assurance in a cost-effective manner. These assessments result in prioritized plans to mitigate risks to defense critical infrastructure, which changes as mission requirements change 

and as additional redundancy is established. The Department then 

takes appropriate risk mitigation steps according to these 

prioritized plans. 

In reviewing the methodology supporting this prioritization, we 

believe DCIP has institutionalized a process that can address the 

type of certification process called for in the House provision, without injecting unwarranted redundant assessment or planning processes. We expect the DOD to continue using the DCIP program to 

review its assets against EMP and other emerging threats to ensure ongoing protection efforts supporting mission assurance. We 

expect the Department to keep the congressional defense committees apprised of any significant updates or changes to the DCIP 

program, as well as to the status of any specific infrastructure assets assessed to have a critical vulnerability to EMP, as they conduct future assessments. 

While we believe the Department has a good process for evaluating the risks and mitigation measures for EMP through the 

DCIP program, we believe that a better understanding of the intelligence community’s views on the threats posed by EMP or HPM 

systems would be helpful in understanding what more might be 

done by DOD to enhance its protective posture. Therefore, we direct the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency to provide a 

briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives, within 60 days of the enactment of 

this Act, on the threats posed to DOD infrastructure by the natural 

occurrence or intentional use of EMP or HPM effects. 

Compliance of military departments with minimum safe staffing 

standards 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1088) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that all military departments comply with Department of Defense Fire and Emergency 

Services Program policy requirements on safe staffing. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
657 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

Determination and disclosure of transportation costs incurred by 

Secretary of Defense for congressional trips outside the United 

States 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1089) that would require the Secretary of Defense to determine the cost of the transportation provided in the case of a trip taken by a member, officer, 

or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying 

out official duties outside the United States for which the Department of Defense provides transportation and to provide a written 

statement of the cost not later than 10 days after completion of the 

trip to the member, officer, or employee involved and to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate or the House of Representatives. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We support public disclosure of official foreign travel by members, officers, and employees of the House of Representatives and 

Senate. To this end, we note that section 1754 (b) of title 22, 

United States Code, contains reporting and disclosure requirements for congressional travel outside the United States, including 

a requirement for reports to be open to public inspection and published in the Congressional Record. We recognize there are circumstances under which transportation provided by the Department of Defense best meets the needs of congressional delegations, 

ranging from protecting the safety and security of the delegation to 

expediency and accessing destinations that have little to no commercial air service. We further note that the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives each 

maintain policies and processes to provide further oversight of travel requests by members and employees of the committees. 

Transfer to the Department of Homeland Security of the Tethered 

Aerostat Radar System 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1091) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer to the Department of 

Homeland Security the Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the transfer of the TARS program took place after 

the House bill was written. 

Sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1092) that would 

amend section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, to permit the 

Secretary of Defense to transfer personal property to border security activities in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
658 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

We note that that the Department of Homeland Security can participate in the sale or donation of excess personal property for border security activities under the current law. 

We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study of the Department of Defense’s process for disposing 

of surplus personal property, focusing on: (1) an overview of how 

the disposal process works in practice; (2) the means used to dispose of surplus property; and (3) recommendations to improve the 

efficiency and effectiveness of the current disposal process. 

Unmanned aircraft systems and National Airspace 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1093) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to enter into a memorandum of 

understanding with a non-Department of Defense entity that is engaged in the test range program authorized under section 332(c) of 

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112– 

95) to allow such entity access to non-regulatory special use airspace if such access: (1) is used by the entity as part of such test 

range program; and (2) does not interfere with the activities of the 

Secretary or otherwise interrupt or delay missions or training of 

the Department of Defense (DOD). The underlying Act authorized 

the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to identify up to six test 

ranges at which interested parties could develop and test procedures under which the FAA might allow access to the National Airspace System on a routine basis. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

However, we agree that: (1) developing established procedures to 

integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the National Airspace 

System will be very important in allowing both DOD and non-DOD 

entities to train with and operate these systems on a routine basis; 

and (2) developing these procedures could include the use of FAAdesignated DOD non-regulatory special use airspace. 

Days on which the POW/MIA flag is displayed on certain federal 

property 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1094) that would require that, on federal installations, the National League of Families POW/MIA Flag be displayed on all days on which the flag of 

the United States is displayed. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress on improvised explosive devices 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1095) that would express the sense of Congress on the use of improvised explosive devices against members of the United States Armed Forces or people 

of the United States. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
659 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress to maintain a strong National Guard and Military Reserve force 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1096) that would express the sense of Congress that (1) the Secretary of Defense 

should make every effort to ensure the Military Reserve and National Guard forces are sustained by a fully-manned and fully-funded force and that the United States fulfill its longstanding commitment to unyielding readiness in terms of defense; (2) the Secretary 

of Defense should act with the knowledge that the National Guard 

and Reserves are critical components of the armed forces, particularly as a means of preserving combat power during a time of budget austerity; and (3) Congress repudiates proposals to diminish the 

National Guard or Reserves and affirms the growth of these components as circumstances warrant. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Access of employees of congressional support offices to Department 

of Defense facilities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1097) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide employees of any congressional support office who work on issues related to national security with access to facilities of the Department of Defense in the 

same manner, and subject to the same terms and conditions, as 

employees of the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

the House of Representatives. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We encourage the Secretary of Defense to implement procedures 

for providing Pentagon access to employees of congressional support offices similar to the procedures currently used to provide access to Government Accountability Office employees and to keep 

the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives informed of the progress of implementing such procedures. 

Cost of wars 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1098) that would require the Department of Defense to post on its public web site the 

costs of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that reports on the costs of the wars in Afghanistan and 

Iraq have been published by the Congressional Budget Office 

(CBO) and the Congressional Research Service (CRS). We further 

note that CBO reports are publicly available and published on the 

Internet, and CRS reports are available to Members of Congress. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
660 

Sense of Congress regarding consideration of foreign languages and 

cultures in the building of partner capacity 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099) that would express the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense (DOD) 

should take into consideration foreign languages and cultures in 

DOD’s training, tools and methodologies for military-to-military activities and building partner capacity. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We encourage the 

DOD to incorporate the consideration of foreign languages and cultures into its training and procedures for engaging in and benefiting from military-to-military cooperation and building partner 

capacity activities. 

Sense of Congress regarding preservation of second amendment 

rights of active duty military personnel stationed or residing in 

the District of Columbia 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1099A) that would express the sense of Congress that active duty military personnel 

who are stationed or residing in the District of Columbia should be 

permitted to exercise fully their rights under the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and therefore should 

be exempt from the District of Columbia’s restrictions on the possession of firearms. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

TITLE XI—CIVILIAN PERSONNEL MATTERS

One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian 

employees working overseas (sec. 1101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1101) that would authorize the head of an executive agency to waive limitations on the 

aggregate of basic and premium pay payable through calendar year 

2014 to an employee who performs work in an overseas location 

that is in the area of responsibility of the Commander, U.S. Central 

Command (CENTCOM), or a location that was formerly in 

CENTCOM but has been moved to an area of responsibility of the 

Commander, U.S. Africa Command, in support of a contingency operation or an operation in response to a declared emergency. The 

amount payable may not exceed the total annual compensation 

payable to the Vice President under section 104 of title 3, United 

States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
661 

One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, 

benefits, and gratuities to personnel on official duty in a combat 

zone (sec. 1102) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1102) that would authorize temporary discretionary authority to federal agencies to 

grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities comparable to those provided to members of the foreign service to an agency’s civilian employees on official duty in a combat zone. This authority would expire at the end of fiscal year 2015. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Extension of voluntary reduction-in-force authority for civilian employees of the Department of Defense (sec. 1103) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1103) that would 

amend section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States Code, to extend 

through September 30, 2015, the authority of the Secretary of Defense or the secretary of a military department to allow certain civilian employees to volunteer for reduction-in-force separations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1101) that would amend section 3502(f)(5) of title 5, United States 

Code, to extend through September 30, 2018, the authority of the 

Secretary of Defense or the secretary of a military department to 

allow certain civilian employees to volunteer for reduction-in-force 

separations. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Extension of authority to make lump-sum severance payments to Department of Defense employees (sec. 1104) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1104) that would 

amend section 5595(i)(4) of title 5, United States Code, to extend 

until October 1, 2018, the authority for the Secretary of Defense or 

the secretary of a military department to pay the total amount of 

severance pay to an eligible civilian employee in one lump sum. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1102). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Revision to amount of financial assistance under Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation 

(SMART) Defense Education Program and assessment of STEM 

and other programs (sec. 1105) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1105) that would increase the flexibility of the Secretary of Defense to determine the 

amount of the financial assistance delivered by the Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1105). 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

requiring an assessment of the SMART program, as well as for the 

National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellowship 

(NSSEFF) program, and a number of Department of Defense PreVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00693 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
662 

Kindergarten through 12th grade Science, Technology, Engineering 

and Mathematics (STEM) programs. 

Extension of program for exchange of information-technology personnel (sec. 1106) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1106) that would authorize for an additional 10 years the Information Technology Exchange Program for the Department of Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would authorize for an additional 5 years the Information Technology Exchange Program for the Department of Defense. 

Temporary authorities for certain positions at Department of Defense research and engineering facilities (sec. 1107) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1107) that would establish new authorities for the direct hiring and management of 

personnel at Department of Defense (DOD) Science and Technology 

Reinvention Laboratories. Specific elements addressed qualified 

candidates possessing a bachelor’s degree, qualified veterans, students, members of the Senior Executive Service (SES), Senior Scientific Technical Managers (SSTM), and specially qualified scientific and professional personnel (known as ST). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1107) that contained a number of similar elements of the House 

provision, namely the direct hiring authority for qualified candidates possessing a bachelor’s degree as well as qualified veteran 

candidates. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that removes elements relating to students, SESs, and STs. 

We note that there have been concerns raised about the management of the senior scientific and technical workforce within DOD 

laboratories. Therefore, we direct the Under Secretary of Defense 

for Personnel and Readiness to submit a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives within 90 days of the enactment of this Act on challenges to 

the management of the scientific and technical workforce of the Department, and recommendations for possible actions to improve 

such management. In preparing this briefing, the Under Secretary 

shall work with the relevant science and technology executives and 

personnel leadership in the Services to identify challenges to this 

workforce and examine opportunities to change policies and practices to improve the effectiveness and efficiencies of management 

procedures and practices. We note that DOD laboratories need to 

have streamlined, effective, and efficient personnel system practices in order to be competitive employers of world-class scientific 

and technical talent. 

Furthermore, as a subset of this review, we believe that the Department should also examine the mechanisms for bringing in interns and other undergraduate students from cooperative education 

programs into the Department’s laboratories to determine if existing means are effective, and to propose any changes that might be 

necessary to improve those programs. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
663 

Compliance with law regarding availability of funding for civilian 

personnel (sec. 1108) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1108) that would require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations, no later 

than 45 days after the enactment of this Act, implementing the authority provided in subsection (a) of section 1111 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

84). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision with an amendment that 

would require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations, no 

later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act, implementing 

the authority provided in subsection (a) of section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. 

Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for 

civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1109) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1109) that would 

amend section 1599c of title 10, United States Code, to extend 

through December 31, 2020, the existing authority of the Secretary 

of Defense to exercise any authority for the appointment and pay 

of health care personnel under chapter 74 of title 38, United States 

Code, for purposes of recruitment, employment, and retention of civilian health care professionals for the Department of Defense. The 

provision would repeal the now-obsolete section 1599c requirement 

for the service secretaries to develop and implement a strategy to 

disseminate the authorities and best practices for the recruitment 

of medical and health professionals. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1104). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Flexibility in employment and compensation of civilian faculty at 

certain additional Department of Defense schools 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1106) that would amend section 1595(c) of title 10, United States 

Code, to add the Defense Institute for Security Assistance Management and the Joint Special Operations University to the list of Department of Defense schools at which the Secretary of Defense may 

employ and compensate civilian faculty as the Secretary considers 

necessary. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the Department of Defense and the military departments have proposed changes over the past several years to extend 

the use of civilian faculty employed under title 10, United States 

Code, at Department of Defense schools and Professional Military 

Education (PME) programs that provide less than 10 months of 

academic instruction. We believe the Department and the Services 

have not applied adequate rigorous analysis of and justification for 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
664 

these requests. Section 1124 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law 101–189) expanded 

the authority to employ civilian faculty at PME schools beyond the 

Naval War College to the National Defense University, the Army 

War College and United States Army Command and General Staff 

College, the Marine Corps Command and Staff College and Air 

University for principal courses of instruction of at least 10 

months. As stated in the Report of the Panel on Military Education 

of the One Hundredth Congress of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, the intent of the expansion was 

that intermediate and senior PME schools were graduate level programs of instruction and civilian instructors were key to maintaining a high quality of instruction. The panel believed competitive civilian faculty could help attract other quality faculty from civilian 

education institutions and add depth to the curriculum, thus improving the quality of instruction. We believe this principle still applies in today’s environment and that the employment of civilian 

faculty under title 10, United States Code, at PME institutions and 

schools should be reserved for courses of instruction that are graduate level in nature. 

Therefore, we direct the Secretary of Defense to review the civilian faculty requirements for all Department of Defense and PME 

schools, universities, and institutes to determine if there are graduate level courses of instruction that are less than 10 months in 

duration that may be authorized the employment of civilian faculty 

under title 10, United States Code. The review should include byprogram justification for the utilization of civilian instructors rather than military instructors or contract instructors, and an accompanying cost-benefit analysis. The Secretary of Defense shall submit the findings of the review and any recommendations for 

changes to the employment of civilian faculty to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives no 

later than March 1, 2015. 

TITLE XII—MATTERS RELATING TO FOREIGN NATIONS

Subtitle A—Assistance and Training 

Modification and extension of authorities relating to program to 

build the capacity of foreign military forces (sec. 1201) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1201) that would extend and modify the authority under section 1206 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109– 

163), as amended, to conduct a program to build the capacity of foreign military forces to conduct counterterrorism operations or stability operations (the ‘‘global train and equip program’’). The provision would expand the purposes for which train and equip assistance may be provided under this program, and expand the types 

of security forces that may receive such assistance. The provision 

would also require that information be submitted, as part of the 

annual budget justification materials, on the planning and execution of the global train and equip program for the coming fiscal 

year. The limitation on funds available for the program would be 

increased from $350.0 million to $425.0 million per fiscal year, and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
665 

the termination of the program would be extended until September 

30, 2016. Finally, the House provision would repeal existing authorities for training and equipping counterterrorism forces in 

Yemen and East Africa. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1201) that would extend the authority for the global train and 

equip program through fiscal year 2018 and require a report on 

counterterrorism-related assistance under the program. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would maintain the current purposes for which train and 

equip assistance may be provided under the program, specifically 

building capability relating to the conduct of counterterrorism operations, and military and stability operations in conjunction with 

U.S. forces. The amendment would expand the types of forces that 

may receive assistance under the program to include a foreign 

country’s security forces with a counterterrorism mission. We recognize that in certain countries the lead counterterrorism unit is 

not located in the Ministry of Defense (MOD). 

The provision included in the agreement would also limit the 

level of funding available annually for the global train and equip 

program to $350.0 million and extend the authority for the program through fiscal year 2017. In addition, funds available for fiscal year 2015 would be restricted to no more than $262.5 million 

until the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, submits a non-binding report on the proposed planning and execution of fiscal year 2015 programs intended to be conducted or supported under the authority to build the capacity of a 

foreign country’s security forces, other than MOD forces, to conduct 

counterterrorism operations. 

The provision in the agreement would include the reporting requirement from the Senate provision regarding counterterrorismrelated assistance, but would not include the House provision’s repeal of existing authorities for training and equipping security 

forces in Yemen and East Africa. 

Global Security Contingency Fund (sec. 1202) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1203) that would make 

certain technical amendments to the authority for the Global Security Contingency Fund (GSCF) under section 1207 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 

81), including changes to the notification requirements. The provision would also require a report to the specified congressional committees on the guidance and processes for the GSCF. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1202) making technical changes to GSCF. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical and 

clarifying amendment. 

We are concerned about the procedures and processes for implementation of the GSCF program and the coordination of GSCF activities with other programs for building partner capacity. Therefore, the Comptroller General is directed to conduct a review of the 

procedures and processes established by the Department of Defense 

(DOD) and Department of State (DOS) to administer and impleVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00697 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
666 

ment activities funded by GSCF. Specifically, the Comptroller General is directed to review: 

(1) The process for the DOS and DOD, including the defense 

agencies and the combatant commands, to identify proposed 

GSCF activities; 

(2) The extent to which DOD, in conjunction with DOS, has 

procedures in place to review, prioritize, and approve activities 

to be funded through GSCF and coordinate those activities 

with other programs to build partner capacity; and 

(3) The extent to which DOD, in conjunction with DOS, has 

developed a monitoring and evaluation framework to measure 

the effectiveness of the activities implemented and funded by 

the GSCF. 

The Comptroller General is directed to submit the report containing the findings of this review to the relevant congressional 

committees by October 1, 2014. For purposes of this requirement, 

the relevant congressional committees are the Committees on 

Armed Services, Foreign Relations, and Appropriations of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, and 

Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 

Training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed 

Forces with military and other security forces of friendly foreign 

countries (sec. 1203) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1203) that would permit the Secretary of Defense to authorize 

training with the military forces or other security forces of a friendly foreign country in order to prepare the U.S. armed forces to 

train the military forces or other security forces of a friendly foreign country and enhance interoperability. Training with foreign 

military forces under this authority must be in the U.S. national 

interest and consistent with U.S. national security strategy as well 

as the recent presidential guidance on security sector assistance. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would: (1) Modify elements of the annual reporting requirement; (2) Add a section relating to the types of training authorized; (3) Provide for coordination and concurrence of the Secretary of State; (4) Establish a notification requirement; and (5) Define for purposes of the delivery of the annual report the appropriate congressional committees. 

We are concerned about the deteriorating readiness of U.S. general purpose forces, particularly ground forces, to conduct their 

mission-essential tasks. We intend to monitor the execution of this 

authority closely and expect activities authorized by this provision 

to be used in a way that most effectively supports the readiness requirements of U.S. forces. 

Authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign 

countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction (sec. 1204) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1205) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, in concurrence with the Secretary 

of State, to provide assistance to the military and civilian response 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
667 

organizations of certain foreign countries in the region around 

Syria in order for such countries to respond effectively to incidents 

involving weapons of mass destruction. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1206) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to provide 

such assistance to foreign nations, without limiting the assistance 

to countries in the region around Syria. 

The agreement includes a provision that would incorporate elements of each bill provision. It would provide the authority for the 

Secretary of Defense to provide assistance to the military and civilian first responder organizations of the nations that border Syria, 

and to provide such assistance to other nations if the Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees of the Secretary’s intention to do so. The provision would also require reports for each year 

in which the authority is used, including details on the assistance 

provided and the costs incurred. The provision would also require 

the Secretary to provide notification if the Secretary plans to use 

more than $4.0 million for the program in a fiscal year. Finally, the 

authority provided in the provision would expire after September 

30, 2017. 

Authorization of National Guard State Partnership Program (sec. 

1205) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1204) that would codify 

the National Guard State Partnership Program in chapter 1 of title 

32, United States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 

the Secretary of State, to establish a program for bilateral or multilateral military-to-military exchanges with the National Guard of 

a State or territory and the national military forces of a foreign nation (‘‘State Partnership Program’’). The provision would also require the publication of new regulations to modify existing regulation to conform to this new authority; provide certain authorization 

for the payment of expenses; require a series of notifications and 

reports; repeal Section 1210 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2517; 32 

U.S.C. 107 note); and establish a sunset of the underlying authority at the end of fiscal year 2016. 

We intend for engagement with other than the military forces to 

be focused—to the maximum extent—on disaster response or emergency response. For military-to-military engagement, we anticipate 

that annual reporting may be done in tabular format, but that the 

Department of Defense should provide a sufficient level of information so that extensive follow-up is not required. This authority is 

in no way intended to preclude National Guard personnel from engaging with partnered forces under other Department of Defense 

and State Department authorities, for example, Joint Combined 

Exchange Training (10 U.S.C. 2011) and implementation of Foreign 

Military Financing programs (22 U.S.C. 2752). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
668 

United States security and assistance strategies in Africa (sec. 1206) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1204) that would direct the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategic framework for U.S. counterterrorism assistance and cooperation in North Africa, including but not limited to programs conducted under the Trans-Sahara Counter Terrorism Partnership, 

Operation Enduring Freedom-Trans Sahara, and other related security assistance activities. The provision would also require the 

Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress on the details 

of this framework, as well as on lessons-learned from recent developments in Mali and the region. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

and clarifying amendment. The agreement also includes provisions 

that would: (1) Require an interagency strategy that supports the 

recent security and political gains in Somalia; (2) Require a classified intelligence assessment on al Shabaab; and (3) Designate an 

existing senior U.S. Government official with existing interagency 

authority for export policy for Africa to coordinate among various 

U.S. Government agencies existing export strategies with the goal 

of significantly increasing U.S. exports to Africa. 

We also acknowledge that the number of armed robbery at sea 

and piracy attacks in the Gulf of Guinea are increasing, with an 

ongoing pattern of cargo thefts and robbery, often occurring in the 

territorial waters of West and Central African states. Ongoing piracy and armed robbery at sea in the Gulf of Guinea pose a threat 

to international navigation, security, and the economic development of states in the region. It has been the U.S. strategy to improve the region’s trade competitiveness and encourage the diversification of exports beyond natural resources. No later than 90 

days after enactment of this Act, we direct the Secretary of Defense 

to provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House of Representatives on the Department of Defense strategy to use its existing authorities to build capacity to 

combat armed robbery at sea, piracy, and other maritime threats. 

We further note the importance of bringing to justice those individuals who committed, conspired to commit, attempted to commit, 

or aided or abetted in the commission of the September 11–12, 

2012, terrorist attack on the Special Mission Compound and Annex 

in Benghazi, Libya. We note that, in January 2013, the Secretary 

of State has authorized a reward of up to $10 million for information leading to the arrest of those individuals. 

Assistance to the Government of Jordan for border security operations (sec. 1207) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1205) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, upon a determination from the President that it is in the national security interests of the United States, to use up to $75.0 million of amounts 

authorized for the Coalition Support Fund account in fiscal years 

2013 and 2014 to support the border security operations of the Jordanian Armed Forces. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
669 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to provide assistance—on a reimbursable basis—to the Government of Jordan for purposes of 

supporting their armed forces efforts to increase security along the 

border between Jordan and Syria. Prior to any reimbursement, the 

provision would require the Secretary of Defense that the Government of Jordan is continuing to support and maintain efforts of the 

armed forces of Jordan to increase security or sustain increased security along the border between Jordan and Syria. Upon such certification, the Secretary of Defense may provide up to $150.0 million from fiscal year 2014 funds, to be expended in fiscal years 

2014 and 2015. 

Support of foreign forces participating in operations to disarm the 

Lord’s Resistance Army (sec. 1208) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1207) that would authorize the Department of Defense to obligate 

not more than $50.0 million in each fiscal year in operation and 

maintenance funding to provide logistical support, services and 

supplies, and intelligence support to: (1) The national military 

forces of Uganda participating in operations to mitigate or eliminate the threat posed by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA); and (2) 

The national military forces of any other countries determined by 

the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of 

State, to be participating in operations to mitigate or eliminate the 

threat posed by the LRA. The Secretary’s authority would expire 

upon the termination of Operation Observant Compass. 

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 1206). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would: (1) Extend the underlying authority through the 

end of fiscal year 2017; (2) Require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report relating to various matters associated with the ongoing operation to support foreign forces; and (3) Prohibit utilizing 25 

percent of the underlying provision until the Secretary submits the 

required report to Congress. 

We note that the support provided by U.S. military advisors was 

unnecessarily restricted due to interpretation of a combat exclusion 

clause and therefore removed it from the existing authority. We believe that U.S. military advisers should assist their partners with 

the full-range of activities short of direct combat. We note this provision expands the previous authority and increases the authorized 

funding level to $50.0 million to provide in-the-field advice, assistance and support to foreign forces searching for Joseph Kony and 

his senior lieutenants, thereby strengthening the training and capabilities of the foreign forces to counter the LRA’s capabilities in 

the region. With this expanded authority, we expect the Department of Defense to continue their progress towards the mission objectives of Operation Observant Compass. We remain fully supportive of this advise and assist operation. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
670 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq 

Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan (sec. 

1211) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1213) that would extend through fiscal year 2014 the authority under section 1201 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as amended, for the Commanders’ 

Emergency Response Program (CERP). The provision would limit 

the amount of funds available for the program to $60.0 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1211) that would extend the CERP authority for one year and 

would require a report on lessons learned and best practices from 

the execution of CERP in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in Afghanistan (sec. 1212) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1212) that would 

amend section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383), as amended, 

to extend the authority to use Department of Defense funds to support reintegration activities in Afghanistan and authorize the use 

of up to $25.0 million for these purposes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1213). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Extension of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations 

(sec. 1213) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1211) that would extend for fiscal year 2014 and modify the authority under section 

1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2008 (Public Law 110–181), as amended, to provide reimbursements to certain nations for support provided to U.S. military operations in Operation Enduring Freedom. The provision would limit 

funds available under this authority (‘‘Coalition Support Funds’’) 

for fiscal year 2014 to $1.5 billion. The provision would also require 

that, prior to making reimbursements to Pakistan, the Secretary of 

Defense must make certain certifications to the congressional defense committees, or invoke a national security waiver. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1215) that would extend the authority under section 1233 of 

Public Law 110–181, as amended, for fiscal year 2014. The provision would also extend through fiscal year 2014 the notification requirements, under section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393) as amended, 

relating to Coalition Support Funds reimbursements for Pakistan 

for support provided by Pakistan. The provision would further extend the limitations, under section 1227(d) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
671 

Stat. 2000), on reimbursements of Pakistan pending certain certifications regarding Pakistan. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Extension and modification of authority to support operations and 

activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (sec. 

1214) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1214) that would extend for fiscal year 2014 the authority under section 1215 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public 

Law 112–81), as amended by section 1211 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–329), for 

the Secretary of Defense to use up to $209.0 million in funds to 

support the operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq (OSC–I). The provision would also authorize the 

OSC–I during fiscal year 2014 to conduct non-operational training 

of Iraqi Ministry of Defense (MOD) personnel in an institutional 

environment to build certain capabilities of the Iraqi security 

forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1212) that would extend for fiscal year 2014 the authority to 

fund the OSC–I under section 1215 of Public Law 112–81, as 

amended. The provision would also authorize the OSC–I during fiscal year 2014 to conduct non-operational, institution-based training 

of Iraqi MOD and Counter Terrorism Service personnel. Such 

training would be required to include elements that promote the 

observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, military professionalism, and respect for legitimate civilian 

authority within Iraq. 

The agreement includes the provision in the Senate committeereported bill. 

An issue of concern is the safety and security of the residents of 

Camp Liberty (Hurriya), Iraq, and impediments to their resettlement in other countries. We direct the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland 

Security, and the Attorney General, to submit a report on the current security situation at Camp Liberty and efforts to relocate the 

camp residents to other countries. The report should include: 

(1) A description of the current security situation at Camp 

Liberty, the disposition of security resources such as T-walls 

and sandbags, and decisions by camp residents on how to use 

those resources; 

(2) A description of the status review and resettlement process conducted by the United Nations High Commissioner on 

Refugees (UNHCR), a discussion of the degree of cooperation 

by camp residents with that process, and an estimate of when 

that process is expected to be completed; 

(3) An estimate as of the date of the report on the number 

of residents still at Camp Liberty, the number of residents that 

have received refugee status, the number of residents that 

have been relocated (including to which countries), and the 

countries that have indicated a willingness to receive resettled 

residents; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
672 

(4) A discussion of the steps that would need to be taken by 

recipient countries, the UNHCR, and the camp residents to relocate the residents to other countries. 

The report should be provided not later than 120 days after the 

date of enactment of this Act to the Committees on Foreign Relations, Armed Services, Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and Judiciary of the Senate and the Committees on Foreign 

Affairs, Armed Services, Homeland Security, and Judiciary of the 

House of Representatives. 

One-year extension and modification of authority for program to develop and carry out infrastructure projects in Afghanistan (sec. 

1215) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1215) that would extend the authority under section 1217 of the Ike Skelton National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111– 

383), as amended, for the program to build large-scale infrastructure projects funded by the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund (AIF). 

The provision would limit the amount available for the AIF in fiscal year 2014 to $279.0 million. The provision would also amend 

the reporting elements of the plan that must be submitted to the 

appropriate congressional committees prior to the use of AIF funds 

in any given fiscal year. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1214) that would extend the authority under section 1217 of Public 

Law 111–383 and limit AIF funding during fiscal year 2014 to 

$250.0 million. It would also require a report on the plan for 

transitioning to the Government of Afghanistan, or a utility owned 

by the Government of Afghanistan, the project management of any 

projects funded with fiscal year 2014 AIF funds. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with technical and 

clarifying amendments. We believe that with the drawdown of U.S. 

troops in Afghanistan and the approaching conclusion of the International Security Assistance Force mission at the end of December 

2014, the justification for the Department of Defense funding largescale infrastructure projects in Afghanistan is increasingly attenuated. We expect that the Department of Defense will cease AIF 

funding for any new large-scale infrastructure projects after fiscal 

year 2014. 

Requirement to withhold Department of Defense assistance to Afghanistan in amount equivalent to 100 percent of all taxes assessed by Afghanistan to extent such taxes are not reimbursed 

by Afghanistan (sec. 1216) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1217) that would require the withholding of Department of Defense (DOD) assistance 

for Afghanistan during fiscal year 2014 in an amount equal to the 

total of all taxes assessed during fiscal year 2013 by the Government of Afghanistan on assistance provided by DOD. The Secretary 

of Defense would be able to waive this requirement if the Secretary 

determines that doing so is necessary to achieve U.S. goals in Afghanistan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
673 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would provide that the requirements of this section terminate 

on the date when the Secretary of Defense notifies the Committees 

on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives that 

a bilateral security agreement between the United States and Afghanistan has entered into force. 

Extension of certain authorities for support of foreign forces supporting or participating with the United States Armed Forces 

(sec. 1217) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1216) that would extend through fiscal year 2014 the authority 

under section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181), as amended, to provide 

logistical support to coalition partners in Afghanistan. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would extend through 

December 31, 2014, two authorities for supporting foreign forces 

participating in coalition operations with U.S. armed forces. First, 

the provision would extend the authority under section 1234 of 

Public Law 110–181 to provide logistical support to coalition partners in Afghanistan. Second, the provision would extend the authority under section 1202 of the John Warner National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364), as 

amended, to use acquisition and cross-servicing agreements to loan 

personnel protection equipment to partner nations in coalition operations and in connection with training for deployment to such operations. The Department has requested the extension of both of 

these authorities in connection with coalition operations in Afghanistan. 

Extension and improvement of the Iraqi special immigrant visa program (sec. 1218) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1218) that would make 

certain improvements to the Iraq Special Immigrant Visa program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1217). 

The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported bill provision with a technical/clarifying amendment. 

Improvement of the Afghan special immigrant visa program (sec. 

1219) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1219) that would make 

improvements to Afghan Special Immigrant Visa program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1218). 

The agreement includes the Senate committee-reported bill provision with a technical/clarifying amendment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
674 

Subtitle C—Matters Relating to Afghanistan Post 2014 

Report on plans to disrupt and degrade Haqqani Network activities 

and finances (sec. 1221) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1221) that would modify the report required under section 1230 of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181), as 

amended, to require additional reporting semi-annually on: The redeployment of U.S. armed forces from Afghanistan; the transfer of 

Department of Defense tasks and functions to other entities as part 

of the transition; and the long-term capability of the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to sustain infrastructure projects 

constructed for the ANSF. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the President to submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report 

on U.S. Government activities and plans to disrupt and degrade 

Haqqani Network activities and finances. The provision sets out 

specific elements of the report, which would be required to be submitted not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Completion of accelerated transition of security responsibility from 

United States Armed Forces to the Afghan National Security 

Forces (sec. 1222) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1222) that would set 

out the policy of the United States and a sense of Congress relating 

to the security transition and the post–2014 U.S. military presence 

in Afghanistan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

We expect the Department of Defense to note the cost of any 

post–2014 presence in its budget request so that Congress can appropriately consider the presence and maintain oversight of U.S. efforts in Afghanistan. 

Defense Intelligence Plan (sec. 1223) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1223) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense and intelligence committees a plan regarding defense intelligence assets in relation to the drawdown of U.S. forces in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. The provision would require the 

plan to include a description of the defense intelligence assets; a 

description of any such assets that are slated to remain in Afghanistan after December 31, 2014; a description of any such assets that 

will be, or have been, reallocated to other locations outside of the 

United States; the defense intelligence priorities that will be, or 

have been, addressed with the reallocation of such assets; the necessary logistics, and operation and maintenance plans, to operate 

in the locations where such assets will be, or have been, reallocated, including personnel, basing, and any host country agreeVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00706 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
675 

ments; and a description of any such assets that will be, or have 

been, returned to the United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Limitation on availability of funds for certain authorities for Afghanistan (sec. 1224) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1224) that would restrict the availability of funds for certain authorities in Afghanistan until 15 days after the Secretary of Defense certifies that the 

United States and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan have concluded a Bilateral Security Agreement (BSA) that meets certain 

specified criteria. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contains no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would limit the availability of funds for certain authorities in 

Afghanistan to no more than 50 percent of the amount authorized 

to be appropriated until 15 days after the Secretary of Defense certifies that a BSA has been signed that is in the national security 

interest of the United States. The Secretary of Defense would be 

authorized to waive the requirements of this provision if the Secretary determines that doing so is in the U.S. national security interest. If the waiver is invoked, the Secretary of Defense is directed 

to brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives on the basis for the determination. 

We believe that such a BSA should ensure that: 

(1) the Department of Defense, its military and civilian personnel, and its contractors are protected from liability to pay 

taxes or other similar charges associated with efforts to carry 

out missions in Afghanistan that have been mutually agreed to 

between the U.S. Government and the Afghan Government; 

(2) the United States has exclusive legal jurisdiction over 

U.S. Armed Forces deployed in Afghanistan; 

(3) the right of self-defense of the U.S. military mission and 

of U.S. military personnel is not infringed; 

(4) the U.S. military in Afghanistan is able to take the necessary measures to protect other U.S. Government offices and 

personnel in Afghanistan; and 

(5) the U.S. military has sufficient access to bases and freedom of movement to carry out such missions and activities as 

the President assigns the military in Afghanistan, including 

the continuing effort to counter al Qaeda and its associated 

forces. 

Subtitle D—Matters Relating to Iran 

Report on United States military partnership with Gulf Cooperation 

Council countries (sec. 1231) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1231) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to the congressional defense committees, within 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, on the United States military partnership with 

the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
676 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical/ 

clarifying amendment. 

Additional elements in annual report on military power of Iran (sec. 

1232) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1232) that would 

amend section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84) by requiring the Secretary 

of Defense to provide information on the global Iranian threat network and how the Iranian threat network reinforces the grand 

strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Additionally, this section 

would require the Secretary of Defense to provide a list of gaps in 

intelligence and to prioritize those gaps by operational need. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the report to include a section on Iran’s global 

network of terrorist and criminal groups and the associated capabilities of those entities. 

We urge the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to describe the 

Department of Defense’s gaps in intelligence associated with Iran’s 

global network of terrorist and criminal groups when the Chairman 

prepares the report required under section 1231 of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112– 

239). 

Integrated air and missile defense programs at training locations in 

Southwest Asia (sec. 1233) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1234) that would 

amend Section 544(c)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 

U.S.C. 2347c(c)(1)) to allow for multilateral missile defense exercises. 

The Senate committee-reported bill included no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Subtitle E—Reports and Other Matters 

Two-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted 

recovery capabilities (sec. 1241) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1202) that would extend the authority of the Department of Defense to establish, develop, and maintain non-conventional assisted recovery (NAR) capabilities for 3 additional years. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1231) that would extend the authority of the Department of 

Defense to establish, develop, and maintain non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities for 2 additional years. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

We remain concerned about the lack of clarity in the reporting 

of NAR activities to include planning, prioritization, and execution 

and have included a statement on their concerns in the classified 

annex accompanying this report. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
677 

Element on 5th generation fighter program in annual report on 

military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China (sec. 1242) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1232) that would add a requirement for the Department of Defense 

to include information on China’s 5th generation fighter programs 

in the congressionally-mandated Annual Report on Military and 

Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

To improve insight into the dynamics of the relationship and 

interactions between the United States and the People’s Republic 

of China and their impact on security, we direct the Chairman of 

the United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission, not later than March 15, 2014, to submit a report on the mandate and purpose of the Commission to the appropriate congressional committees. 

The report shall include: (1) A summary and description of the 

changes that have occurred in the relationship between the United 

States and China since December 31, 2000, with respect to those 

national security and economic issues that would impact the mandate of the Commission; and (2) Recommendations of the Commission for statutory changes to update the mandate and purpose of 

the Commission, taking into the account changes in the relationship between the United States and China. 

The appropriate congressional committees include (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the 

Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Finance of 

the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and 

the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. 

Report on posture and readiness of the Armed Forces to respond to 

an attack or other contingency against United States diplomatic 

facilities overseas (sec. 1243) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1241) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Chairman, 

Joint Chiefs of Staff, to submit a report, not later than 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, to the Senate Committee on Armed Services, the House Committee on Armed Services, the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, and the House 

Committee on Foreign Affairs, that assesses the terrorist groups 

that threaten the United States in Africa and a description of the 

readiness, posture, and alert status of relevant U.S. Armed Forces 

in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the United States; and any 

changes implemented since the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would make modifications to the required contents of the report. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
678 

Limitation on establishment of Regional Special Operations Forces 

Coordination Centers (sec. 1244) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1245) that would prohibit the expenditure of funds for the establishment of Regional 

Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers (RSCC) or similar 

regional entities and require a joint report by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to be submitted to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations 

of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House 

of Representatives. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 342) that would prohibit the expenditure of any funds for the 

RSCCs in fiscal year 2014 and direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, in coordination with the Commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, 

not later than September 30, 2013, to submit a report to the congressional defense committees outlining, at a minimum: (1) the requirement and justification for the establishment of RSCCs; (2) the 

number and locations of planned RSCCs; (3) the projected cost to 

establish and maintain the proposed RSCCs in future years; (4) the 

relevance to and coordination with other multilateral engagement 

activities and academic institutes supported by the geographic combatant commanders and State Department; and (5) any legislative 

authorities that may be needed to establish RSCCs. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Additional reports on military and security developments involving 

the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (sec. 1245) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1246) that would 

amend the report on Military and Security Developments Involving 

the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), as originally required by section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81), to require the Secretary 

of Defense to submit the report every 2 years beginning on November 1, 2013, through November 1, 2017. The section would also require the Secretary of Defense to submit an update to the report 

if, in the Secretary of Defense’s estimation, interim events or developments occurring during the 2–year period between reports requires an update. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note that the only change to section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 is that the report will 

be submitted every 2 years instead of every year, and interim reports may be submitted, as needed. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to provide a classified briefing to the appropriate 

congressional committees, not later than 270 days after the date of 

enactment of this Act, on the following issues related to the DPRK: 

(1) A description of the governmental and economic activities, including bilateral trade, economic development, and fiVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00710 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
679 

nancial investment, between the People’s Republic of China 

and the DPRK. 

(2) A description of the entities and individuals of the People’s Republic of China engaged in the activities described 

under subparagraph (1). 

(3) An assessment of the impact of the activities described 

under subparagraph (1) on the weapons of mass destruction 

program and ballistic missile program of the DPRK. 

The appropriate congressional committees are (1) the Committee 

on Armed Services, the Committee on Finance, and the Committee 

on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on 

Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives. 

Sense of Congress on missile defense cooperation with the Russian 

Federation and limitations on providing certain missile defense 

information to the Russian Federation (sec. 1246) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1248) that would limit 

funds to provide the Russian Federation with access to certain missile defense information. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 233) that would express the sense of Congress concerning missile defense cooperation with Russia and would also limit funds to 

provide the Russian Federation access to certain missile defense information. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would express the sense of Congress concerning missile 

defense cooperation with the Russian Federation and would establish several limitations on providing the Russian Federation with 

access to certain missile defense information. 

Amendments to annual report under Arms Control and Disarmament Act (sec. 1247) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1247) that would modify section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (Title 22, 

United States Code, section 2593a) to define the appropriate congressional committees to which the annual report required under 

section 2593a would be provided. Those committees are: the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, 

and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, 

and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House 

of Representatives. The provision would also require a briefing to 

the appropriate congressional committees each spring on the most 

recent version of the report. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Report on actions to reduce support for ballistic missile proliferation 

(sec. 1248) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1249) that would require reports on efforts to gain the cooperation of Russia and China 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
680 

to reduce the spread of technology and expertise that supports the 

ballistic missile programs of Iran, North Korea, Syria, and other 

nations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report on steps that have been taken, 

and that are planned to be taken, to reduce the spread of technology and expertise that could support the ballistic missile development programs of Iran, North Korea, Syria, and other nations. 

We expect the appropriate elements of the Intelligence Community to brief the appropriate committees of Congress on the ballistic 

missile development programs of Iran, North Korea, and Syria, as 

well as other nations of proliferation concern, and the spread of 

technology and expertise that supports those programs. 

Reports on international agreements relating to the Department of 

Defense (sec. 1249) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1250) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary 

of State, to notify the congressional defense committees, and the 

House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Committee on 

Foreign Relations, not later than 15 days after the date on which 

a Status of Forces Agreement between the United States and a foreign nation is signed, renewed, amended, otherwise revised, or terminated. This section would apply to such agreements that are 

signed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit semi-annually a report on certain agreements pertaining to matters primarily 

or significantly related to or involving the Department of Defense. 

The amendment would also terminate the requirement established 

in this provision on December 31, 2019. 

We note that nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede section 112b of title 1 United States Code (commonly known 

as the ‘‘Case-Zablocki Act’’). 

Revision of statutory references to former NATO support organizations and related NATO agreements (sec. 1250) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1252) that would revise certain references in titles 10 and 22, United States Code, to 

reflect recent changes to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

organizational structure. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1234). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Executive agreements with the Russian Federation relating to ballistic missile defense (sec. 1251) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1253) that would limit 

funds to implement executive agreements relating to the ballistic 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
681 

missile defense capabilities of the United States, unless certain 

conditions are met. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would express the sense 

of Congress that any executive agreement between the United 

States and the Russian Federation relating to ballistic missile defense should not limit the development or deployment of missile defense systems or capabilities of the United States or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It would also require the President, or 

the President’s designee, to brief the appropriate committees of 

Congress prior to signing an executive agreement with Russia relating to ballistic missile defense. 

Rule of construction (sec. 1252) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1258) that would set 

forth that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the 

use of force against the Syrian Arab Republic or the Islamic Republic of Iran. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note that this provision shall not be construed to infringe on 

the President’s constitutional authorities to preserve, protect, and 

defend the Nation. 

Limitation on availability of funds to implement the Arms Trade 

Treaty (sec. 1253) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1262) that would limit 

the availability of funds available to the Department of Defense for 

the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would add a clause stating that nothing in this provision 

would preclude the Department of Defense from assisting foreign 

countries in bringing their laws and regulations up to U.S. standards. Should the Secretary of Defense determine such activities are 

required and appropriate, we encourage the Secretary to coordinate, to the maximum extent practicable, on such activities with 

the Secretary of State. 

Report on military and security developments involving the Russian 

Federation (sec. 1254) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1268) that would require the Secretary of Defense, not later than June 1, 2014, and 

annually thereafter through 2017, to submit to the specified congressional committees a report on the current and future military 

power of the Russian Federation. The report would address the 

current and probable future course of military-technological development of the Russian military, the tenets and probable development of Russian security and military strategy, and military organizations and operational concepts, for the 20-year period following 

the report. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
682 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require a one-time report by the Secretary of Defense 

to the specified congressional committees on the security and military strategy of the Russian Federation. The amendment would require that the report include certain specified matters. 

Prohibition on use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements 

with Rosoboronexport (sec. 1255) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1274) that would prohibit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense after fiscal year 2013 for the purchase of any 

equipment from the Russian state corporation, Rosoboronexport, 

until the Secretary of Defense makes certain specified certifications 

to the congressional defense committees. The Secretary of Defense 

would be authorized to waive this restriction if the Secretary certifies that doing so is in the national security interests of the 

United States. If the waiver is invoked, the Secretary is required 

to submit a report to Congress not later than 30 days before purchasing equipment from Rosoboronexport. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1233). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would clarify that nothing in the Act would prohibit the 

supply of spare parts for the sustained maintenance of helicopters 

operated by the Afghan National Security Forces. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Monitoring and evaluation of overseas humanitarian, disaster, and 

civic aid programs of the Department of Defense 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1207) that would permit that up to 5 percent of funds authorized to be appropriated by 

this Act to carry out sections 401, 402, 404, 407, 2557, and 2561 

of title 10, United States Code, may be made available to conduct 

monitoring and evaluation of programs conducted pursuant to such 

authorities during fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We understand the Department of Defense is in the process of 

developing metrics and incorporating them into existing program 

management tools to better monitor and evaluate overseas humanitarian, disaster, and civic aid programs of the Department. However, according to the Department, such efforts are not expected to 

be fully implemented for at least 1 to 2 years. 

We, therefore, direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy 

to provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House Representatives on the status of the Department’s implementation efforts no later than 180 days after enactment of this Act. The briefing shall include, but not be limited to, 

a status update on metrics development and implementation, a description of how the Department plans to evaluate program and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
683 

project outcomes and impact, including cost effectiveness and the 

extent to which programs meet designated goals, and an analysis 

of steps taken to implement the recommendations from the following reports: (1) The Government Accountability Office’s Report 

titled ‘‘Project Evaluations and Better Information Sharing Needed 

to Manage the Military’s Efforts’’; (2) The Department of Defense 

Inspector General Report numbered ‘‘DODIG–2012–119’’; and (3) 

The RAND Corporation’s Report prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense titled ‘‘Developing a Prototype Handbook for 

Monitoring and Evaluating Department of Defense Humanitarian 

Assistance Projects.’’ 

Special Immigrant Visas for certain Iraqi and Afghan allies 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1216) that would make 

certain amendments to section 602(b) of Afghan Allies Protection 

Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–8) and section 1244 of the Refugee 

Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–181). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress on commencement of new long-term nation building or large-scale infrastructure development projects in Afghanistan 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1219) that would express the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should seek not to commence any new long-term 

nation building or large-scale infrastructure development project in 

Afghanistan after 2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We expect that, 

with the conclusion of the International Security Assistance Force 

mission at the end of 2014, the Department of Defense should no 

longer seek to begin new large-scale infrastructure development 

projects in Afghanistan. 

Sense of Congress 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1220) expressing the 

Sense of the House of Representatives that the Special Immigration Visa programs for Iraqis and Afghans are critical to the U.S. 

national security, and that these programs must be reformed and 

extended in order to meet the congressional intent with which they 

were created. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Limitation on funds to establish permanent military installations or 

bases in Afghanistan 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1225) that would prohibit the use of funds to establish any military installation or base 

for the permanent stationing of U.S. armed forces in Afghanistan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
684 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress on the defense of the Arabian Gulf 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1233) that would express the sense of Congress with respect to the importance of the 

defense of the Arabian Gulf. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We believe that the United States should continue to maintain 

the appropriate posture to defend the Arabian Gulf. 

Statement of policy on condemning the Government of Iran for its 

state-sponsored persecution of its Baha’i minority 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1235) that would condemn the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its persecution of its Baha’i minority in Iran. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that both the U.S. House of Representatives and the 

U.S. Senate have passed similar resolutions condemning the actions of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran as it relates to the Baha’i minority. 

Technical correction relating to funding for NATO Special Operations Headquarters 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1235) that would make technical modifications to section 1244 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84), as amended, that would authorize the Secretary 

of Defense to use up to $50.0 million from Operation and Maintenance in any fiscal year to support the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Special Operations Headquarters. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Role of the Government of Egypt to United States national security 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1242) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary 

of State, to submit a report that contains a plan for United States 

military assistance and cooperation with Egypt. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note the continuing national security interests of the United 

States in ensuring that the Government of Egypt enhances its ability to detect, disrupt, dismantle, and defeat terrorist organizations 

and that Egypt remains a stable, strategic partner in the region. 

We urge the Secretary of Defense to ensure that any plan to modernize and improve U.S. security cooperation with and assistance 

to Egypt addresses these matters. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
685 

Sense of Congress on the military developments on the Korean peninsula 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1243) that would express certain findings and the sense of Congress regarding the military developments on the Korean peninsula. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

Statement of Congress on defense cooperation with Georgia 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1244) that would express findings and a statement of Congress with respect to the Republic of Georgia. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress on the conflict in Syria 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1251) that would express the sense of Congress with respect to the situation in Syria. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Limitation on availability of funds for Threat Reduction Engagement activities and United States contributions to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1254) that would provide that none of the funds made available for fiscal year 2014 for 

Threat Reduction Engagement activities may be obligated or expended until the President certifies to Congress that no state party 

to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) has undertaken nuclear weapons test activities in fiscal year 2013 that are 

inconsistent with U.S. interpretations regarding obligations under 

such Treaty. 

This section would also provide that none of the funds made 

available for fiscal year 2014 for contributions to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization may be used for lobbying or advocacy in the United States relating to the CTBT. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that regarding lobbying and advocacy activities in the 

United States by the Comprehensive Ban Treaty Organization (18 

U.S.C. 1913) prohibits such activities. 

Sense of Congress on military-to-military cooperation between the 

United States and Burma 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1255) that would express the sense of Congress regarding military-to-military cooperation between the United States and the Union of Burma. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
686 

We have a pronounced interest in the status of military-to-military relations between the United States and the Union of Burma 

and support efforts to enhance military professionalism, accountability, and civilian controls. We recognize that high standards of 

military professionalism, strict accountability, and effective civilian 

controls reduce the risks of abuse committed by military forces and 

encourage the Secretary of Defense to keep the congressional defense committees informed of military-to-military engagements between the United States and the Union of Burma. 

Sense of Congress on the stationing of United States forces in Europe 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1256) that would express certain findings and the sense of Congress with respect to the 

stationing of U.S. armed forces in Europe. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that an enduring U.S. presence and engagement with allies and other partners across Europe and Eurasia provides critical 

access and infrastructure necessary to accomplish U.S. strategic 

priorities and to facilitate a rapid U.S. response for complex contingencies in Europe, Eurasia, the Middle East, Africa as well as the 

Mediterranean and Atlantic Ocean. We further note that the 

United States continues to have an interest in supporting the stability and security of Europe. 

Accordingly, we direct the Secretary of Defense, not later than 90 

days after the date of enactment of this Act, to provide the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on: 

(1) The plans, if any, of the Department of Defense to maintain and enhance the capabilities of the forward-stationed active duty service members, forward-deployed rotational units, 

and reserve forces assigned to U.S. European Command to fulfill U.S. commitments under Article V of the North Atlantic 

Charter and other missions vital to protecting U.S. national security interests; 

(2) The plans, if any, of the Department of Defense to maintain and enhance the capabilities of such forces to provide 

logistical and operational support to U.S. Central Command, 

U.S. Africa Command, and U.S. Strategic Command; and 

(3) The steps, if any, that the Department of Defense has 

taken to implement the recommendations of the Government 

Accountability Office with regard to improved cost estimation 

to support informed force posture decisions with regard to the 

stationing of U.S. armed forces in Europe. 

Sense of Congress on military capabilities of the People’s Republic 

of China 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1257) that would express certain findings and the sense of Congress regarding the military developments of the People’s Republic of China. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
687 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We reaffirm our interest in the Asia-Pacific region and the implementation of the rebalance to that region, as described in the Defense Strategic Guidance, dated January 2012. We encourage the 

Secretary of Defense to continue engaging with the congressional 

defense committees to facilitate the successful implementation of 

the strategic rebalance and to continue to support the national security interests of the United States and its allies and partners in 

the Asia-Pacific region. 

Sense of Congress regarding relations with Taiwan 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1259) that would express the sense of Congress regarding the diplomatic allowances 

granted to high-level Taiwanese officials and commercial interests. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

Sense of Congress on the threat posed by Hezbollah 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1260) that would express the sense of Congress with respect to the threat posed by 

Hezbollah. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Combating crime through intelligence capabilities 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1261) that would authorize the supply of intelligence resources to the Joint Interagency 

Task Force South (JIATF–S) in coordination with U.S. Southern 

Command (SOUTHCOM) to combat crime. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note sequestration and budget restrictions are having a negative impact not only on readiness and modernization accounts, but 

also on the ability of the Department of Defense (DOD) to carry out 

ongoing missions. 

Budgetary restrictions have drastically reduced the ability of 

DOD and partner agencies to allocate assets—particularly as it 

pertains to intelligence capabilities to the JIATF–S mission of 

countering illicit drug trafficking and disruption of transnational 

criminal organizations in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility. 

We believe that the across-the-board sequestration cuts to the 

DOD budget are arbitrary and undermine the national security of 

the United States. We encourage the Secretary of Defense to do as 

much as practicable to continue key operations of the geographic 

combatant commands, such as the counternarcotics missions of 

SOUTHCOM and JIATF–S. 

War Powers of Congress 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1263) that would set 

forth that nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize any 

use of military force. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
688 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Prohibition on use of drones to kill United States citizens 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1264) that would prohibit the Department of Defense from using drones to kill U.S. citizens. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sale of F–16 fighter aircraft to Taiwan 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1265) that would require the sale of no fewer than 66 F–16C/D multirole fighter aircraft to Taiwan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We recognize that the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8) 

states that ‘‘the United States will make available to Taiwan such 

defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be 

necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability’’ and that ‘‘the President and the Congress shall determine 

the nature and quantity of such defense articles based solely upon 

their judgment on the needs of Taiwan, in accordance with procedures established by law.’’ We believe the President should continue to take steps, consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act, to 

enable the Taiwan air forces to contribute to a sufficient self-defense capability. 

Statement of policy and report on the inherent right of Israel to selfdefense 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1266) that would make 

a statement of policy and require a report on the inherent right of 

Israel to self-defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We reaffirm the U.S. commitment to the security of the State of 

Israel to help the Government of Israel preserve its qualitative 

military edge. 

Report on collective and national security implications of Central 

Asian and South Caucasus energy development 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1267) that would require the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary 

of State and the Secretary of Energy, to submit to the appropriate 

congressional committees a detailed report on the implications of 

new energy resource development and distribution networks, in the 

areas surrounding the Caspian Sea, for energy security strategies 

of the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

(NATO). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
689 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, not later than 90 days after enactment of the Act, 

on regional security in the Caucasus region and its implications for 

the security interests of the United States and NATO. 

Limitation on assistance to provide tear gas or other riot control 

items 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1269) that would prohibit funds authorized or appropriated by the House bill from being 

used to provide tear gas or other riot control items to the government of a country undergoing a transition to democracy in the Middle East or North Africa without certification from the Secretary of 

Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Report on certain financial assistance to Afghan military 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1270) that would require the Secretary of Defense to report to Congress on measures 

to monitor and ensure that U.S. financial assistance to the Afghan 

National Security Forces (ANSF) is not being used to purchase fuel 

from Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We direct the Secretary of Defense to provide the Committees on Armed Services of 

the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing, within 90 

days of the enactment of this Act, on the Department’s measures 

to monitor and ensure that U.S. financial assistance to the ANSF 

is not being used to purchase Iranian fuel in violation of U.S. sanctions. 

Israel’s right to self-defense 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1271) that would express the support of Congress for Israel’s lawful exercise of self-defense including actions to halt regional aggression. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress strongly supporting the full implementation of 

United States and international sanctions on Iran and urging 

the President to continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions 

legislation 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1272) that would express Congress’ support for full implementation of U.S. and international sanctions against Iran and would urge the President to 

continue to strengthen enforcement of sanctions legislation. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
690 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Sense of Congress on the illegal nuclear weapons programs of Iran 

and North Korea 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1273) that would express the sense of Congress regarding the threat posed by nuclear 

proliferation in North Korea and Iran. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION

Specification of cooperative threat reduction programs and funds 

(sec. 1301) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1301) that would define the programs and funds that are Cooperative Threat Reduction 

(CTR) programs and funds as those authorized to be appropriated 

in section 301 of this Act and specify that CTR funds shall remain 

available for obligation for 3 fiscal years. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1301). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Funding allocations (sec. 1302) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1302) that would allocate specific amounts for each program element under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Program 

from within the overall $528.5 million that the committee would 

authorize for the CTR program. This section would also require notification to Congress 15 days before the Secretary of Defense obligates and expends fiscal year 2014 funds for purposes other than 

those specifically authorized. In addition, this section would provide limited authority to obligate amounts for a program element 

under the CTR program in excess of the amount specifically authorized for that purpose. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1302). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that provides that for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 the Department may exceed the 10-percent limitation of section 5965 of title 

22, United States Code for activities with respect to Syria. This enhanced authority is an extraordinary measure that is without 

precedent in the CTR program, and we will exercise congressional 

oversight to ensure the enhanced authority is properly and effectively used. We expect the Department to balance the need for destroying the Syrian chemical weapons stockpile, an urgent national 

security threat, with the expediency of using the CTR funds to assist in this effort. Given the fluid and urgent nature of this endeavor, the amendment contains enhanced briefing requirements rather 

than detailed reports. We expect these briefings to provide the appropriate congressional committees with the necessary detailed inVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00722 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
691 

formation to ensure an accounting of the funding provided under 

the program while achieving the ultimate goal of destroying Syria’s 

chemical stockpile. We expect the Department to provide, without 

delay, thorough answers to questions that might arise during these 

briefings to ensure adequate oversight in the use of this enhanced 

authority. 

Extension of authority for utilization of contributions to the cooperative threat reduction program (sec. 1303) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1303) that would extend the authority of the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program to accept monetary contributions from partner nations, as set 

forth in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2010 (Public Law 111–84), from December 31, 2015, to December 

31, 2018. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1303). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Strategy to modernize Cooperative Threat Reduction and prevent 

the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and related 

materials in the Middle East and North Africa region (sec. 

1304) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1304) that would direct 

the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of 

State and the Secretary of Energy, to prepare a strategy and implementation plan for preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass 

destruction and related materials in the Middle East and North Africa not later than March 31, 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1236) requiring the President to prepare such report and 

strategy. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would make technical changes. 

TITLE XIV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS

Subtitle A—Military Programs 

Working capital funds (sec. 1401) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1401) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the armed forces and 

agencies of the Department of Defense for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1401). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

National Defense Sealift Fund (sec. 1402) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1402) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the National Defense Sealift 

Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1402). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
692 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense (sec. 1403) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1403) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for 

chemical agents and munitions destruction, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4501. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1403). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug activities, Defense-wide (sec. 

1404) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1404) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for 

drug interdiction and counterdrug activities, defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1404). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1405) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1405) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for 

the Office of the Inspector General, as specified in the funding 

table in section 4501. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1405). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1406) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1406) authorizing appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Defense Health Program, 

as specified in the funding table in section 4501. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1406). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile 

Use of National Defense Stockpile for the conservation of a strategic 

and critical materials supply (sec. 1411) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1411) that would modify certain provisions of the President’s authority to maintain and 

manage a national defense stockpile to allow the Defense Logistics 

Agency to more proactively engage in the market. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
693 

Authority to acquire additional materials for the National Defense 

Stockpile (sec. 1412) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1412) that would provide authority to acquire certain additional strategic and critical 

materials for the National Defense Stockpile. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Subtitle C—Other Matters 

Authority for transfer of funds to Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration 

Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois 

(sec. 1421) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1421) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to transfer $143.1 million from the 

Defense Health Program to the Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund 

created by section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84) for the operations of the 

Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1422). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home 

(sec. 1422) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1422) that would authorize $67.8 million to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 from 

the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund for the operation 

of the Armed Forces Retirement Home. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1421). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Cemeterial expenses (sec. 1423) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1423) that would authorize $45.8 million to be appropriated for the Department of the 

Army for fiscal year 2014 for cemeterial expenses. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

TITLE XV—AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR

OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS

Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations 

Purpose (sec. 1501) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1501) stating the purpose of the title. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
694 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1501). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Procurement (sec. 1502) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1502) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for procurement accounts 

for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and 

defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 

4102. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1502). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Research, development, test, and evaluation (sec. 1503) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1503) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified 

in the funding table in section 4202. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1503). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Operation and maintenance (sec. 1504) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1504) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the Armed 

Forces and other agencies of the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 

4302. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1504). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Military personnel (sec. 1505) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1505) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the armed 

forces and other agencies of the Department of Defense for military 

personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4402. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1505). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Working capital funds (sec. 1506) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1506) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the armed 

forces and other agencies of the Department of Defense for working 

capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1506). 

The agreement includes this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
695 

Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide (sec. 

1507) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1507) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for drug interdiction and counterdrug activities, defense-wide, 

as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1509). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Defense Inspector General (sec. 1508) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1508) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the Department of Defense for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of 

Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1510). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Defense Health Program (sec. 1509) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1509) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for the use of the armed 

forces and other agencies of the Department of Defense for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 

4502. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1511). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—Financial Matters 

Treatment as additional authorizations (sec. 1521) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1521) stating that the 

amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition 

to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 1521). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Special transfer authority (sec. 1522) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1522) that would provide the Department of Defense with $3.0 billion of special transfer 

authority in fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1522) that would provide the Department of Defense with $4.0 

billion of special transfer authority in fiscal year 2014. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters 

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (sec. 1531) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1531) that would require that funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (ASFF) for fiscal year 2014 be subVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00727 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
696 

ject to the specified conditions contained in section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 

110–181), as amended. The provision would also require that an office or official be identified as responsible for each program or activity supported with ASFF. In addition, the provision would require that not less than $47.3 million of ASFF for fiscal year 2014 

be used for the recruitment and retention of women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1532) that would require that ASFF for fiscal year 2014 be subject 

to the specified conditions contained in section 1513 of Public Law 

110–181. The provision would also provide the Secretary of Defense 

certain authorities for the disposal of equipment in Afghanistan. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require that not less than $25.0 million of ASFF for fiscal year 2014 be available to be used for programs and activities 

to support the recruitment, integration, retention, training, and 

treatment of women in the ANSF. The amendment would also include certain authorities for the Secretary of Defense relating to 

the disposal of equipment in Afghanistan. In this regard, we direct 

the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense 

committees a report on the Department’s plans for the final disposition of the C–27A aircraft acquired to build the capabilities of 

the ANSF. The report should be submitted not later than 180 days 

after the enactment of this Act. 

A key objective of the ASFF is to build the capacity of the ANSF, 

specifically the Afghan Air Force and the Special Mission Wing, to 

operate, maintain, and sustain rotary wing aircraft. We direct the 

Secretary of Defense, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, to submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the potential to incorporate U.S.-manufactured rotary wing aircraft into the ANSF after the current program 

of record is completed. The report should include an estimate of the 

anticipated costs (including costs associated with procurement and 

sustainment), schedule, and a description of the training required 

for potentially incorporating U.S.-manufactured rotary wing aircraft into the ANSF. The report should also include a description 

of any other actions required to be undertaken to facilitate incorporating such aircraft into the ANSF. 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund (sec. 1532) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1531) that would authorize annual transfer authorities, current reporting requirements, and other associated activities for the Joint 

Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical/ 

clarifying amendment. 

Future role of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (sec. 1533) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1532) that would require the Secretary of Defense to provide a report to Congress on 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
697 

the future role of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical/ 

clarifying amendment. 

Extension of authority for Task Force for Business and Stability Operations in Afghanistan (sec. 1534) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1533) that would extend the authority under section 1535 of the 

Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2011 (Public Law 111–383) for the Task Force for Business and 

Stability Operations in Afghanistan. The provision would limit 

funding available for the programs of the Task Force to $63.8 million during fiscal year 2014. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

National Defense Sealift Fund 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1507) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

the National Defense Sealift Fund as specified in the funding table 

in section 4502. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

1508) authorizing additional appropriations for fiscal year 2014 for 

chemical agents and munitions destruction as specified in the funding table in section 4502. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Limitation on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support 

for Operation Observant Compass 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1533) that would require that none of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for 

operation and maintenance by section 1504, as specified in the 

funding table in section 4302 of this Act, may be obligated or expended for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support 

for Operation Observant Compass until the Secretary of Defense 

submits to the congressional defense committees a report, required 

elsewhere in this Act, on Operation Observant Compass. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
698 

Report on U.S. force levels and costs of military operations in Afghanistan 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1534) that would require the Secretary of Defense to report to the Committees on 

Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on 

U.S. forces levels in Afghanistan and the estimated costs of U.S. 

military operations in Afghanistan for each of fiscal years 2015 

through 2020. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Limitation on funds for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund to acquire certain aircraft, vehicles, and equipment 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1535) that would limit 

the availability of $2.6 billion of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund (ASFF) until the 

Secretary of Defense submits a report to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the aircraft, vehicles, and equipment to be purchased with ASFF authorized to be appropriated by this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. We note that the 

Department of Defense has revised its requested funding for the 

ASFF, resulting in a reduction of $1.45 billion from the budget request. 

TITLE XVI—INDUSTRIAL BASE MATTERS

Subtitle A—Defense Industrial Base Matters 

Periodic audits of contracting compliance by Inspector General of 

Department of Defense (sec. 1601) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1601) that would require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to conduct an audit of the Department’s compliance with contracting 

practices and policies related to procurement under section 2533a 

of title 10, United States Code, which pertains to the requirement 

to buy certain articles from American sources and is frequently referred to as the ‘‘Berry Amendment.’’ This section would also require the Inspector General to include the findings of such periodic 

audits as part of the semiannual report transmitted to congressional committees as required by the Inspector General Act of 1978 

(Public Law 95–452). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying amendment. 

Foreign space activities (sec. 1602) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1605) that would prevent the Secretary of Defense from entering into contracts for comVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00730 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
699 

mercial satellite services with a covered foreign entity in a covered 

foreign country. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would add a determination standard (of reasonable belief) that 

the covered foreign entity has an ownership interest that enables 

that government to affect satellite operations. The notice and exception provision has also been adjusted to require a 7–day noticeand-wait to the congressional defense committee. 

The amendment further contains a provision that prohibits the 

President from authorizing or permitting the construction of a global navigation satellite system ground monitoring station owned or 

operated on behalf of a foreign government on U.S. territory unless 

the Secretary of Defense and Director of National Intelligence certify that the ground station will not be capable of being used to 

gather intelligence in the United States or to improve a foreign 

weapons system. The amendment contains a national security 

waiver if certain conditions are met, and a report to accompany the 

waiver with a notice to the appropriate congressional committees 

30 days before such waiver is used. The provision has a sunset period of 5 years following the date of enactment. 

We do not intend this provision to affect general private or scientific cooperation with other parties. 

Proof of Concept Commercialization Pilot Program (sec. 1603) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1606) that would allow 

the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering to 

establish a 5–year pilot program to accelerate the commercialization of basic research innovations from qualifying institutions. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying amendment. 

Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Small Business Concerns 

Advancing small business growth (sec. 1611) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1602) that would require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, 

and Logistics to publish, and update annually, a list of capabilities 

and characteristics that would enable a qualified small business 

concern to become competitive as an other-than-small business for 

future contracts awarded by the Department of Defense. 

This section would also require any contract awarded to a qualified small business concern that would exceed the applicable receipt-based small business size standard (or if the contract would 

exceed $70.0 million in an industry with an employee based size 

standard) to include a contract clause that would encourage the 

small business to develop the capabilities and characteristics identified by the Under Secretary if they desire to remain competitive 

as other-than-small business in that industry. 

In addition, this section would amend chapter 142 of title 10, 

United States Code, to enable Procurement Technical Assistance 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
700 

Centers (PTAC) to provide additional support to these businesses 

without the funding and cost-share limitations that are otherwise 

applicable to PTAC support. 

Finally, this section would require the Secretary of Defense to 

submit three annual reports to the congressional defense committees beginning on March 1, 2015, on the implementation of the 

amendments made by this section, along with any recommendations for improving the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying amendment. 

Amendments relating to Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (sec. 1612) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1603) that would 

amend section 2413 of title 10, United States Code, to allow the 

Secretary of Defense to defray up to 65 percent of the eligible entity’s cost of furnishing assistance under the program and would also 

amend section 2414 of title 10, United States Code, to increase limitations on the value of assistance that may be provided under the 

program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision. 

Reporting on goals for procurement contracts awarded to small 

business concerns (sec. 1613) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1607) that would 

amend section 644 of title 15, United States Code, to require each 

federal agency to submit a report detailing small business concerns. This report would include information regarding, among 

other concerns, veteran and service-disabled veteran-owned small 

businesses. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying amendment. 

Credit for certain small business subcontractors (sec. 1614) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1609) that would 

amend section 637d of title 15, United States Code, redefining pertaining to subcontracting. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision with a clarifying amendment. 

Inapplicability of requirement to review and justify certain contracts 

(sec. 1615) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1611) that would dismiss the requirements stated in section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 pertaining to the proVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00732 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
701 

visions of section 46 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657s). 

The purpose of this provision is to reduce the number of unnecessarily duplicative reports. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Strategic plan for requirements for war reserve stocks of meals 

ready-to-eat 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1604) that would require the Administrator of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) not 

to make any reductions in requirements for war reserve stocks of 

meals ready-to-eat (MRE) until a comprehensive strategy is developed and briefed to the congressional defense committees. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We note that the DLA has developed a comprehensive strategic 

plan that: ensures an adequate MRE inventory for each of the 

Services; maintains the appropriate levels of MRE war reserves; 

and provides for a surge capability to support unforeseen contingencies. We also acknowledge that the DLA has decided to hold 

current MRE stock levels steady through the end of combat operations in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan until the enduring requirement can be fully established. 

Program to provide federal contracts to early stage small businesses 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1608) that would 

amend section 631 of title 15, United States Code, which would 

provide improved access to federal contract opportunities for early 

stage small business concerns. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

GAO study on subcontracting reporting systems 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1610) that would require the Comptroller General to submit a report to the Committee 

on Small Business of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate regarding the feasibility of using federal subcontracting reporting 

systems. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not contain the provision. 

We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to submit not later than 365 days after enactment of this Act a report 

studying the feasibility of using federal subcontracting reporting 

systems, including the federal subcontracting reporting system required by section 2 of the Federal Funding Accountability and 

Transparency Act of 2006 and any electronic subcontracting reporting award system used by the Small Business Administration, to 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
702 

attribute subcontractors to any particular contracts in the case of 

contractors that have subcontracting plans under section 8(d) of the 

Small Business Act that pertain to multiple contracts with executive agencies. 

TITLE XVII—SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE AND

RELATED REFORMS

Subtitle A—Reform of Uniform Code of Military Justice 

Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the 

Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1701) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 542) that would amend 

chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, to include in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) specified rights for victims 

of offenses under the UCMJ. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 564) that would require the Secretary of Defense to recommend modifications to the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) to 

include in the MCM specified rights for victims of offenses under 

the UCMJ. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Revision of Article 32 and Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice (sec. 1702) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 531) that would amend 

Article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) (10 

U.S.C. 860) to limit the authority of a court-martial convening authority to modify the findings and sentence imposed by a courtmartial. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 555). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment and a provision that would amend Article 32, UCMJ, 

(10 U.S.C. 832) to require the completion of a preliminary hearing, 

normally conducted by a judge advocate, prior to referral to general 

court-martial for trial of any charge or specification. 

The changes to Article 60, UCMJ, included in the agreement significantly restrict the ability of a convening authority to modify the 

adjudged findings and sentence of a court-martial, except in limited 

circumstances. 

The provision included in the agreement changes Article 32, 

UCMJ, proceedings from an investigation to a preliminary hearing. 

Under current law and Rule 405 of the Rules for Court-Martial, an 

Article 32, UCMJ, investigation includes inquiry into the truth of 

the matters set forth in the charges, provides a means to ascertain 

and impartially weigh all available facts in arriving at conclusions 

and recommendations, and serves as a tool of discovery. The agreement establishes that an Article 32, UCMJ, preliminary hearing 

has a narrower objective: (1) To determine whether there is probable cause to believe an offense has been committed and the accused committed the offense; (2) Determine whether the convening 

authority has court-martial jurisdiction over the offense and the acVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00734 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
703 

cused; (3) Consider the form of the charges; and (4) Recommend the 

disposition that should be made of the case. 

The Secretary of Defense is directed to recommend changes to 

Rule 405 of the Rules for Court-Martial and other rules, if appropriate, in the Manual for Courts-Martial to facilitate the purposes 

of the Article 32, UCMJ, preliminary investigation, as revised by 

the agreement. Changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial shall be 

completed in time to coincide with the effective date of changes to 

Article 32, UCMJ, effectuated by this Act. 

Elimination of five-year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for additional offenses involving sex-related crimes (sec. 

1703) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 532) that would amend 

Article 43 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (section 843 of 

title 10, United States Code) to eliminate the 5–year statute of limitations on trial by court-martial for sexual assault and sexual assault of a child. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 551). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense 

in presence of trial counsel, counsel for the victim, or a Sexual 

Assault Victim Advocate (sec. 1704) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 543) that would amend 

Article 46 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 846) 

to require that, upon notice by trial counsel to defense counsel that 

trial counsel intends to call a complaining witness to testify at an 

investigation under Article 32, Uniform Code of Military Justice 

(10 U.S.C. 842) or court-martial, the defense counsel shall make all 

requests to interview the complaining witness through the trial 

counsel, and, if requested by the complaining witness, the defense 

counsel interview shall take place only in the presence of the counsel for the complaining witness or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 553). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment that would require that, if requested by an alleged victim of an alleged sex-related offense who is subject to a request for 

interview by defense counsel, such interview shall take place only 

in the presence of trial counsel, a counsel for the victim, or a Sexual Assault Victim Advocate. 

Discharge or dismissal for certain sex-related offenses and trial of 

such offenses by general courts-martial (sec. 1705) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 533) that would amend 

article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 856) 

to require that the sentence for a person found guilty of specified 

sex-related offenses include, at a minimum, a dismissal or dishonorable discharge. 

The House bill also contained a provision (sec. 550A) that would 

amend article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
704 

856) to require that the sentence for a person found guilty of specified sex-related offenses include, at a minimum, a dismissal or dishonorable discharge and confinement for 2 years. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

554) that would amend article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (10 U.S.C. 856) to require that the sentence for a person 

found guilty of specified sex-related offenses include, at a minimum, a dismissal or dishonorable discharge, and would limit jurisdiction over these specified sex-related offenses to a general courtmartial. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Participation by victim in clemency phase of courts-martial process 

(sec. 1706) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 544) that would amend 

Article 60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 

860(b)) to require that complaining witnesses be provided an opportunity to submit matters for consideration by the convening authority before the convening authority acts on the findings and sentence of a court-martial. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

556) that would amend Article 60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 860(b)) to: (1) Afford a complaining witness 

an opportunity to respond to any clemency matters submitted by 

an accused to the convening authority that refer to the complaining 

witness; (2) Afford a complaining witness an opportunity to submit 

matters to the convening authority in any case in which findings 

and sentence have been adjudged for an offense involving the complaining witness; and (3) Prohibit the convening authority from 

considering matters that go to the character of a complaining witness unless the matters were presented at the court-martial. 

The agreement includes a provision that would amend Article 

60(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. 860(b)) to 

require that a victim be provided an opportunity to submit matters 

for consideration by the convening authority before the convening 

authority takes action on the findings or sentence of a court-martial that involved the victim, and to provide that the convening authority shall not consider any submitted matters that relate to the 

character of a victim unless such matters were presented as evidence at trial and not excluded at trial. 

Repeal of the offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code 

of Military Justice (sec. 1707) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

562) that would amend Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (section 925 of title 10, United States Code) to prohibit forcible sodomy and bestiality. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
705 

Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial to eliminate factor relating to character and military service of the accused in rule on 

initial disposition of offenses (sec. 1708) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 546) that would require the Secretary of Defense to recommend to the President a 

change to the Manual for Courts-Martial that would strike the 

character and the military service of the accused from the factors 

a commander should consider when deciding how to dispose of sexrelated offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 565) that would require that the discussion pertaining to Rule 

306 of the Manual for Courts-Martial be amended, not later than 

180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, to strike the character and military service of the accused from the factors a commander should consider in deciding how to dispose of any offense. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Prohibition of retaliation against members of the Armed Forces for 

reporting a criminal offense (sec. 1709) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

563) that would require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations, not later than 120 days after the enactment of this Act, 

that prohibit retaliation against an alleged victim or other member 

of the armed forces who reports a criminal offense. This provision 

would also require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to 

Congress, not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, 

setting forth recommendations as to whether the Uniform Code of 

Military Justice should be amended to prohibit retaliation against 

an alleged victim or other member of the armed forces who reports 

a criminal offense. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Subtitle B—Other Amendments to Title 10, United States Code 

Prohibition on service in the Armed Forces by individuals who have 

been convicted of certain sexual offenses (sec. 1711) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

531) that would amend chapter 37 of title 10, United States Code, 

to prohibit the commissioning or enlistment in the armed forces of 

individuals who have been convicted of felony offenses of rape or 

sexual assault, forcible sodomy, incest, or of an attempt to commit 

these offenses. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding 

consideration of request for permanent change of station or unit 

transfer by victim of sexual assault (sec. 1712) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 534) that would amend 

section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, to clarify that the requirement for timely determination and action on an application by 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
706 

a victim of certain sexual offenses for a change of station or unit 

transfer applies to the Coast Guard. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 533). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Temporary administrative reassignment or removal of a member of 

the Armed Forces on active duty who is accused of committing 

a sexual assault or related offense (sec. 1713) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 535) that would authorize service secretaries to provide guidance for commanders regarding their authority to make a timely determination and to take 

action regarding whether a service member serving on active duty 

who is alleged to have committed specified sexual offenses under 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice should be temporarily reassigned or removed from a position of authority or from an assignment, not as a punitive measure, but solely for the purpose of 

maintaining good order and discipline within the unit. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 532). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Expansion and enhancement of authorities relating to protected 

communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions (sec. 1714) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 527) that would amend 

section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, to enhance protections 

for military whistleblowers. The House provision would: expand the 

categories of prohibited personnel actions; expand the class of communications protected under the statute; increase the time period 

during which an allegation of reprisal must be investigated from 60 

days to 1 year; require Department of Defense Inspectors General 

to make explicit determinations as to whether a prohibited personnel action had occurred, a determination that is now made by 

the Secretary concerned; require the Secretary concerned, in cases 

where a violation occurred, to take corrective action on behalf of 

the whistleblower and appropriate disciplinary action against the 

individual who committed the prohibited personnel action; require 

military legal assistance before a board for correction of military 

records on behalf of whistleblowers; and apply the burdens of proof 

applicable in civilian whistleblower cases under title 5, United 

States Code, to military whistleblower cases. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 511) that would amend section 1034 of title 10, United States 

Code, to: expand the categories of prohibited personnel actions and 

class of protected communications under the statute; increase the 

time period during which an allegation of reprisal must be investigated from 60 days to 180 days; retain the authority of the Secretary concerned to make the determination as to whether reprisal 

occurred, but require such Secretary to make such a determination 

within 30 days of receiving a report from an Inspector General, and 

if so determined, to take corrective action on behalf of the whistleblower and appropriate disciplinary action against the individual 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
707 

who committed the prohibited personnel action; and retain the current burdens of proof applicable to military whistleblower cases. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would: increase the time period during which an allegation of reprisal must be investigated from 60 days to 1 year; authorize military legal assistance before a board for correction of 

military records on behalf of a whistleblower in cases where the 

Judge Advocate General concerned determines that the whistleblower would benefit from such assistance; and require that the Inspector General investigation be conducted outside the immediate 

chain of command, or at least one organization higher in the chain 

of command, relative to the whistleblower and the person alleged 

to have taken the retaliatory action. 

Inspector General investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault (sec. 1715) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 537) that would amend 

section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, to require the 

Inspector General to review and investigate allegations of retaliatory personnel actions for making a protected communication regarding violations of law or regulation that prohibit rape, sexual 

assault, or other sexual misconduct. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 542). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Designation and availability of Special Victims’ Counsel for victims 

of sex-related offenses (sec. 1716) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 536) that would amend 

chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, to require service secretaries to designate legal counsel (to be known as ‘‘Victims’ Counsel’’) for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an individual 

eligible for legal assistance who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of whether the report of that offense is restricted or unrestricted. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 539) that would require the service secretaries to implement 

a program to provide a Special Victims’ Counsel to service members who are victims of a sexual assault committed by a member 

of the armed forces. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

clarifying the types of legal assistance that may be provided under 

this provision. 

Subtitle C—Amendments to Other Laws 

Tracking of compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments for purposes of preventing and 

responding to sexual assaults (sec. 1721) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 522) that would require the Secretary of Defense to direct service secretaries to verify 

and track the compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments required as part of the comVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00739 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
708 

prehensive policy for the Department of Defense sexual assault 

prevention and response program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would amend section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to require the 

Secretary of Defense to direct the service secretaries to verify and 

track the compliance of commanding officers in conducting organizational climate assessments. 

Advancement of submittal deadline for report of independent panel 

on assessment of military response systems to sexual assault 

(sec. 1722) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 549(b)) that would 

amend section 576(c)(1)(B) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to provide that the 

panel established to conduct an independent review and assessment of the systems used to investigate, prosecute, and adjudicate 

crimes involving sexual assault and related offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice would terminate no later than one 

year after the first meeting of the panel. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 543). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Retention of certain forms in connection with Restricted Reports and 

Unrestricted Reports on sexual assault involving members of 

the Armed Forces (sec. 1723) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

538) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that 

copies of Department of Defense Forms 2910 and 2911 filed in connection with Restricted Reports and Unrestricted Reports of sexual 

assault are retained for the longer of 50 years or the period that 

such forms are required to be retained pursuant to Department of 

Defense directives. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Timely access to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators by members 

of the National Guard and Reserves (sec. 1724) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

537) that would require service secretaries to ensure that each 

member of the National Guard or Reserves who is the victim of a 

sexual assault either during the performance of duties as a member of the National Guard or Reserves, or is a victim of a sexual 

assault by another member of the National Guard or Reserves, has 

access to a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator not later than 2 

business days following a request for such assistance. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require that each member of the National Guard 

or Reserves who is the victim of a sexual assault either during the 

performance of duties as a member of the National Guard or ReVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00740 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
709 

serves, or is a victim of a sexual assault by another member of the 

National Guard or Reserves, has timely access to a Sexual Assault 

Response Coordinator. 

Qualifications and selection of Department of Defense sexual assault 

prevention and response personnel and required availability of 

Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (sec. 1725) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 541) that would amend 

section 1602(e)(2) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) to require the 

Secretary of Defense to establish selection qualifications for members of the armed forces or civilian employees for assignment to 

duty as Sexual Assault Response and Prevention Program Managers, Sexual Assault Response Coordinators, and Sexual Assault 

Victim Advocates. In addition, this provision would require the Secretary of each military department to assign at least one Sexual 

Assault Nurse Examiner-Adult/Adolescent to each brigade or equivalent unit level unless the Secretary determines that compliance 

would impose an undue burden. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

536(b)) that would require the Secretary of Defense to review the 

adequacy of the training, qualifications, and experience of service 

members and civilian employees assigned to a position that includes responsibility for sexual assault prevention and response. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would: (1) Require the assignment of at least one full-time sexual assault nurse examiner to each military medical treatment facility in which an emergency department operates 24 hours per 

day; (2) Require that a sexual assault nurse examiner be made 

available at other military medical treatment facilities, consistent 

with the Department of Justice National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations, Adult/Adolescent; and (3) Require that the Secretary of Defense submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this 

Act, on the review of the adequacy of the training, qualifications, 

and experience of service members and civilian employees assigned 

to positions that include responsibility for sexual assault prevention and response in the armed forces. 

We encourage the Department of Defense to include board certification to the extent possible as part of the training and certification requirement for sexual assault nurse examiners. 

Additional responsibilities of Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office for Department of Defense sexual assault prevention and response program (sec. 1726) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

535) that would amend section 1611(b) of the Ike Skelton National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111– 

383) to require the Director of the Sexual Assault Prevention and 

Response Office (the Director) to: (1) oversee development and implementation of the comprehensive policy for the Department of 

Defense (DOD) sexual assault prevention and response program; 

(2) serve as the single point of authority, accountability, and overVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00741 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
710 

sight for the sexual assault prevention and response program; (3) 

undertake responsibility for the oversight of the implementation of 

the sexual assault prevention and response program by the armed 

forces; (4) collect and maintain data of the military departments on 

sexual assault; (5) provide oversight to ensure that the military departments maintain documents relating to allegations and complaints of sexual assault involving service members and courtsmartial or trials of service members for sexual assault offenses; (6) 

act as a liaison between DOD and other federal and state agencies 

on programs and efforts relating to sexual assault prevention and 

response; (7) oversee development of strategic program guidance 

and joint planning objectives for resources in support of the sexual 

assault prevention and response program, and make recommendations on modifications to policy, law, and regulations needed to ensure the continuing availability of such resources; and (8) provide 

the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) any 

records or documents on sexual assault in the armed forces, including restricted reports with the approval of the individuals who filed 

such reports, that are required for the purposes of the administration of the laws administered by the Secretary of the VA. 

The provision would amend subtitle A of title XVI of the Ike 

Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 

(Public Law 111–383) to require the Director to collect and maintain data from the services on sexual assaults involving service 

members and to develop metrics to measure the effectiveness of, 

and compliance with, the training and awareness objectives on sexual assault and prevention. 

The provision would also amend section 1631(f) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) to require the service secretaries to include in the 

case synopsis portion of the annual report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the armed forces the unit of each service member accused of committing a sexual assault and the unit of 

each service member who is a victim of a sexual assault. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would amend section 

1611(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) to require the Director to 

collect and maintain data of the military departments on sexual assault; act as a liaison between DOD and other federal and state 

agencies on programs and efforts relating to sexual assault prevention and response; oversee development of strategic program guidance and joint planning objectives for resources in support of the 

sexual assault prevention and response program, and make recommendations on modifications to policy, law, and regulations 

needed to ensure the continuing availability of such resources; and 

develop metrics to measure the effectiveness of, and compliance 

with, training and awareness objectives of the military departments on sexual assault prevention and response. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
711 

Subtitle D—Studies, Reviews, Policies, and Reports 

Independent reviews and assessments of Uniform Code of Military 

Justice and judicial proceedings of sexual assault cases (sec. 

1731) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 533(c)) that would require the Response Systems Panel established under subsection 

(a)(1) of section 576 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) (FY13 NDAA) to assess the 

appropriateness of statutorily mandated minimum sentencing provisions for additional offenses under the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice (UCMJ), and would require the Judicial Proceedings Panel 

established under subsection (a)(2) of the FY13 NDAA to assess the 

implementation and effect of the mandatory minimum sentences 

established elsewhere in this bill. 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 536(c)) that would require the Response Systems Panel to conduct an assessment regarding whether the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of Victims’ Counsel to provide legal assistance to victims of alleged sexrelated offenses should be expanded to include legal standing to 

represent the victim during investigative and military justice proceedings in connection with the prosecution of the offense; and 

would require the Judicial Proceedings Panel to conduct an assessment of the implementation and effect of authorizing Victims’ 

Counsel to provide legal assistance to victims of alleged sex-related 

offenses. 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 542(c)) that would require the Response Systems Panel to assess the feasibility and appropriateness of extending to victims of military crimes the additional right afforded a crime victim in civilian criminal legal proceedings under subsection (a)(4) of section 3771 of title 18, United 

States Code, and the legal standing to seek enforcement of crime 

victim rights provided by subsection (d) of such section. 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 549 (a),(c), and (d)) 

that would require the Response Systems Panel to conduct an assessment of the impact, if any, that removing from the chain of 

command any disposition authority regarding charges preferred 

under the UCMJ would have on overall reporting and prosecution 

of sexual assault cases, and to review and provide comment on the 

report of the Secretary of Defense on the role of military commanders in the military justice process required elsewhere in this 

Act; and would require the Judicial Proceedings Panel to assess the 

likely consequences of amending of the definition of rape and sexual assault under Article 120 of the UCMJ to expressly cover a situation in which a person subject to the UCMJ commits a sexual 

act upon another person by abusing one’s position in the chain of 

command of the other person to gain access to or coerce the other 

person. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

544) that would require the Response Systems Panel to include in 

the comparison of military and civilian systems for the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of adult sexual assault crimes, 

required by section 576(d)(1)(B), an assessment of the opportunities 

for clemency provided in the military and civilian systems, the apVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00743 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
712 

propriateness of clemency proceedings in the military system, the 

manner in which clemency is used in the military system, and 

whether clemency in the military justice system could be reserved 

until the end of the military appeals process. The provision would 

also require the Response Systems Panel to assess the means by 

which the name, if known, and other necessary identifying information of an alleged offender that is collected as part of a restricted 

report of a sexual assault could be compiled into a protected, 

searchable database. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

546) that would require the Judicial Proceedings Panel to assess 

the adequacy of the provision of compensation and restitution for 

victims of offenses under the UCMJ, and develop recommendations 

on expanding such compensation and restitution. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

545) that would require the Response Systems Panel and the Judicial Proceedings Panel to assess the effectiveness of provisions of 

law on sexual assault prevention and response adopted and provisions offered but not adopted during the markup by the Senate 

Committee on Armed Services of the bill to enact the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. 

The agreement includes a provision that would consolidate the 

provisions, delete redundant provisions, and align the additional 

responsibilities as appropriate under the Response Systems Panel 

and the Judicial Proceedings Panel. 

Review and policy regarding Department of Defense investigative 

practices in response to allegations of Uniform Code of Military 

Justice violations (sec. 1732) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 539) that would require the Secretary of Defense to review the practices of military 

criminal investigative organizations (MCIO) regarding the investigation of alleged sex-related offenses involving members of the 

armed forces, including the extent to which the MCIOs make a recommendation regarding whether an allegation of a sex-related offense appears founded or unfounded, and to develop a uniform policy regarding the use of case determinations to record the results 

of investigations of violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would expand the scope of the review to MCIO investigations 

of allegations of any offense under the Uniform Code of Military 

Justice. 

Review of training and education provided members of the Armed 

Forces on sexual assault prevention and response (sec. 1733) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 540) that would require the Secretary of Defense to develop a uniform curriculum, to 

include lesson plans, to ensure that sexual assault prevention and 

response training and education for members of the armed forces 

are uniform across the Department of Defense. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
713 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

536(a)) that would require the Secretary to review the adequacy of 

the training provided to service members on sexual assault prevention and response, and to prescribe any modifications necessary to 

the training provided members of the armed forces on sexual assault prevention and response. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the Secretary of Defense to identify common core elements that must be included in any training or education provided to service members on sexual assault prevention 

and response and to submit a report containing the results of the 

review, including the common core elements identified in the review, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives not later than 120 days after the date of 

enactment of this Act. 

Report on implementation of Department of Defense policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual 

assaults involving members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1734) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550G) that would 

amend section 1631(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) to require 

service secretaries to include in their annual reports to the Secretary of Defense on sexual assaults: (1) A description of the implementation of the comprehensive policy on the retention of and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults involving 

service members; and (2) The policies, procedures, and the processes implemented by the secretary concerned to ensure detailed 

evidence and records are transmitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs for sexual trauma that occurred during active duty 

service. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the progress made in developing and implementing the comprehensive policy on the retention and access to evidence and records relating to sexual assaults 

involving service members and to submit a report containing the 

results of the review to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

Senate and the House of Representatives not later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Review of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment cases (sec. 1735) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550) that would require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the Office of 

Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity for the purposes of 

identifying resource and personnel gaps in the office, the role of the 

office in sexual harassment cases, and evaluating how the office 

works with the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office to 

address sexual assault in the armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
714 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to determine whether 

sexual harassment cases should be evaluated or addressed within 

the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity and to 

identify and assess the capability of the Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity to track sexual harassment cases. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Enhanced protections for prospective members and new members of 

the Armed Forces during entry-level processing and training 

(sec. 1741) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 548) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the secretary of the department 

in which the Coast Guard is operating to maintain a policy that defines and prescribes what constitutes an inappropriate relationship, 

communication, conduct, or contact, including when such an action 

is consensual, between a service member who exercises authority 

or control over, or supervises a prospective member of the armed 

forces undergoing entry-level processing or training. The provision 

would also require that a service member who violates this policy 

be processed for administrative separation when the member is not 

otherwise punitively discharged or dismissed from the armed forces 

for that violation, and would require the Secretary of Defense to 

submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

House of Representatives a proposed amendment to chapter 47 of 

title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), 

to create an additional article regarding violations of the policy described above. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

557) that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit to the 

Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of 

Representatives, not later than 120 days after the enactment of 

this act, a report on whether legislative action is required to modify 

the Uniform Code of Military Justice (chapter 47 of title 10, United 

States Code), to prohibit sexual acts and contacts between military 

instructors and their trainees. 

The agreement includes a provision that would combine the 

House and Senate provisions. 

Commanding officer action on reports on sexual offenses involving 

members of the Armed Forces (sec. 1742) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

541) that would require commanding officers to immediately refer 

to the appropriate military criminal investigation organization reports of sex-related offenses involving members of the commander’s 

chain of command. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
715 

Eight-day incident reporting requirement in response to unrestricted 

report of sexual assault in which the victim is a member of the 

Armed Forces (sec. 1743) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 545) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating to establish and maintain a policy for a written incident report to detail actions taken 

or in progress to provide the victim of a sexual assault with necessary care and support, to refer the allegation of sexual assault to 

the appropriate investigative agency, and to provide initial notification to the chain of command above the unit in which the victim 

served when such notification had not already taken place. This 

provision would require the incident report to be provided within 

8 days of the unrestricted report of a sexual assault, and would require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations to carry out 

the policy within 180 days of the date of enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses for trial by court-martial (sec. 1744) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

552) that would require review of decisions not to refer charges of 

rape or sexual assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts to commit 

these offenses to trial by court-martial. In any case in which the 

staff judge advocate recommends that the charges be referred to 

trial by court-martial and the convening authority decides not to 

refer the charges to trial by court-martial, the convening authority 

would be required to forward the case file to the service secretary 

for review. In cases where the staff judge advocate recommends 

that the charges not be referred to trial by court-martial and the 

convening authority agrees, the convening authority would be required to forward the case file to a superior commander authorized 

to exercise general court-martial convening authority for review. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Inclusion and command review of information on sex-related offenses in personnel service records of members of the Armed 

Forces (sec. 1745) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 547) that would require the Secretary of Defense to require commanders to include 

letters of reprimand, nonpunitive letters of actions and counseling 

statements involving substantiated cases of sexual harassment or 

sexual assault in the performance evaluation reports of service 

members. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

534) that would require that complaints of a sex-related offense resulting in a court-martial conviction, non-judicial punishment, or 

administrative action be noted in the personnel service record of 

the service member, regardless of the member’s grade. The proviVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00747 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
716 

sion would also require the Secretary of Defense to prescribe regulations requiring commanders to review the history of substantiated sexual offenses of service members permanently assigned to 

the commander’s facility, installation, or unit. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Prevention of sexual assault at military service academies (sec. 

1746) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550D) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that each of the military 

service academies adds a section in the ethics curricula of such 

academies that outlines honor, respect, and character development 

as such pertain to the issue of preventing sexual assault in the 

armed forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the curricula of each of the military service academies to include a section 

that outlines honor, respect, and character development as such 

pertain to the issue of preventing sexual assault in the armed 

forces and that the training included in the curricula be provided 

within 14 days after the initial arrival of a new cadet or midshipman at the military service academy and repeated annually 

thereafter. 

Required notification whenever members of the Armed Forces are 

completing Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National 

Security Positions (sec. 1747) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550E) that would require the Secretary of Defense to inform service members at the 

earliest time possible, such as upon enlistment and commissioning, 

and during sexual assault awareness training and service member 

interactions with sexual assault response coordinators, of the policy 

of instructing an individual to answer ‘‘no’’ to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security Positions 

with respect to consultation with a health care professional if the 

individual is a victim of sexual assault and the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional or mental health condition 

strictly in relation to the sexual assault. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require that a service member be notified of the policy 

of instructing an individual to answer ‘‘no’’ to question 21 of Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for National Security Positions 

with respect to consultation with a health care professional if the 

individual is a victim of sexual assault and the consultation occurred with respect to an emotional or mental health condition 

strictly in relation to the sexual assault whenever the member is 

required to complete Standard Form 86 of the Questionnaire for 

National Security Positions. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
717 

Subtitle F—Sense of Congress Provisions 

Sense of Congress on commanding officer responsibility for command climate free of retaliation (sec. 1751) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

540) that would express the sense of Congress that: (1) commanding officers are responsible for establishing a command climate in which sexual assault allegations are properly managed and 

fairly evaluated and a victim can report criminal activity, including 

sexual assault, without fear of retaliation, including ostracism and 

group pressure from other members of the command; (2) the failure 

of commanding officers to maintain such a command climate is an 

appropriate basis for relief from their command positions; and (3) 

senior officers should evaluate subordinate commanding officers on 

their performance in establishing a command climate free of retaliation. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Sense of Congress on disposition of charges involving certain sexual 

misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice 

through courts-martial (sec. 1752) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

558) that would express the sense of the Senate that charges of 

rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy, or attempts to commit these 

offenses should be disposed of by court-martial rather than by nonjudicial punishment or administrative action, and that the disposition authority should include in the case file a justification in any 

case where these charges are disposed of by non-judicial punishment or administrative action. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would express the sense of Congress. 

Sense of Congress on the discharge in lieu of court-martial of members of the Armed Forces who commit sex-related offenses (sec. 

1753) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

559) that would express the sense of the Senate that: (1) the armed 

forces should be sparing in discharging in lieu of court-martial 

service members who have committed rape, sexual assault, forcible 

sodomy, or attempts to commit such offenses, and should do so only 

when the facts of the case clearly warrant such discharge; (2) 

whenever possible, victims of these offenses should be consulted 

about the discharge of the service member; (3) commanding officers 

should consider the views of these victims when determining 

whether to discharge service members in lieu of court-martial; and 

(4) discharges of service members in lieu of court-martial for the 

specified offenses should be characterized as Other Than Honorable. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment that would express a sense of Congress. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
718 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Servicemembers’ accountability, rights, and responsibilities training 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530A) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that all service members 

understand and comply with specified rights and responsibilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Inspector General of the Department of Defense review of separation 

of members of the Armed Forces who made unrestricted reports 

of sexual assault 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 530B) that would require the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to conduct a review to identify all members of the armed forces who, 

since January 1, 2002, were separated from the armed forces after 

making an unrestricted report of sexual assault. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Secretary of Defense report on role of commanders in military justice process 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 538) that would require the Secretary of Defense to assess the current role and authorities of commanders in the administration of military justice 

and the investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of offenses 

under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Enhancement to requirements for availability of information on sexual assault prevention and response resources 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 550B) that would require the Secretary of Defense to ensure that information relating 

to sexual assault prevention and response and resource information 

is prominently posted in specified locations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that section 572(a)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) requires the 

Department of Defense to ‘‘post and widely disseminate information about the resources available to report and respond to sexual 

assaults, including the establishment of a hotline phone number 

and Internet websites available to all members of the armed 

forces.’’ We further understand that the Sexual Assault Prevention 

and Response Office is currently updating existing policy to include 

this requirement, and look forward to the final policy being published as soon as possible. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
719 

Health welfare inspections 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 564) that would require the secretary of each military department to conduct health 

and welfare inspections on a monthly basis to ensure and maintain 

security, military readiness, and good order and discipline. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

DIVISION B—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS 

Summary and explanation of funding tables 

Division B of this Act authorizes funding for military construction projects of the Department of Defense. It includes funding authorizations for the construction and operation of military family 

housing as well as military construction for the reserve components, the defense agencies, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. It also provides authorization 

for the base closure accounts that fund military construction, environmental cleanup, and other activities required to implement the 

decisions in base closure rounds. 

The following tables provide the project-level authorizations for 

the military construction funding authorized in Division B of this 

Act and summarize that funding by account. Funding for base closure projects is summarized in the table that follows, and is explained in additional detail in the table included in title XXVII of 

this report. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Short title (sec. 2001) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2001) that would designate division B of this Act as the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 2001). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified 

by law (sec. 2002) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2002) that would ensure that the authorizations provided in titles XXI through XXVII 

and XXIX shall expire on October 1, 2016, or the date of enactment 

of an act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 

2017, whichever is later. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2002). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
720 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Effective date 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2003) that would provide that titles XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, XXVI, XXVII, and 

XXIX of this Act take effect on October 1, 2013, or the date of enactment of this Act, whichever is later. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

TITLE XXI—ARMY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary 

The Department of Defense requested authorization of appropriations of $1.1 billion for military construction and $556.9 million for 

family housing for the Army for fiscal year 2014. The agreement 

includes authorization of appropriations of $1.1 billion for military 

construction and $556.9 million for family housing for the Army for 

fiscal year 2014. 

The budget request included $75.0 million for a Command and 

Control facility for U.S. Army Pacific. While we support the requirement for this facility, we are concerned that the unit cost for 

this facility is high compared to a standard design even when accounting for Area Cost Factors. Additionally, we believe the full 

amount requested by the Department is not necessary in light of 

efforts to reduce the size of headquarters staffs across the Department. Therefore, the agreement includes $70.0 million, a reduction 

of $5.0 million, for this facility. 

The budget request included $33.0 million for Host Nation Support Planning and Design. In light of unobligated balances in the 

Planning and Design accounts from previous years, the agreement 

reflects a $5.0 million reduction. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2101) that would authorize military construction projects for the active component of 

the Army for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2101). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Family housing (sec. 2102) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2102) that would authorize new construction and planning and design of family housing units for the Army for fiscal year 2014. It would also authorize 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
721 

funds for facilities that support family housing, including housing 

management offices and housing maintenance and storage facilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2102). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Authorization of appropriations, Army (sec. 2103) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2103) that would authorize appropriations for the active component military construction and family housing projects of the Army for fiscal year 2014. 

This provision would also provide an overall limitation on the cost 

of the fiscal year 2014 military construction and family housing 

projects authorized for the active duty component of the Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2103). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military Academy, New York (sec. 2104) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2109) that would prohibit the obligation or expenditure of funds for 

the second increment of barracks construction at the U.S. Military 

Academy (USMA), New York, as requested, until the Secretary of 

the Army certifies to the congressional defense committees that the 

Secretary has entered into a contract for the renovation of MacArthur Short Barracks at the USMA, consistent with the plan provided to the congressional defense committees in March 2013. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the Secretary of the Army to certify to the 

congressional defense committees that the Secretary intends to 

award a contract for the renovation of MacArthur Short Barracks 

concurrent with assuming beneficial occupancy of the renovated 

Scott Barracks. 

Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project 

(sec. 2105) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2104) that would provide additional authority for a project initially provided in section 

2101 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136) at Picatinny Arsenal, New 

Jersey, for construction of a Research and Development Loading 

Facility. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2106). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 

project (sec. 2106) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2105) that would modify the authorization contained in section 2101(b) of the Military 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
722 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of 

Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) for construction of an APS 

Warehouses at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2105). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 

project (sec. 2107) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2106) that would modify the authorization contained in section 2101(a) of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of 

Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for construction of a Regional 

Logistic Support Complex at Fort Lewis, Washington. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2104). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2010 projects (sec. 

2108) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2107) that would extend the authorizations for three projects originally authorized by 

section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 11–84) until October 1, 

2014, or the date of the enactment of an act authorizing funds for 

military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2108). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec. 

2109) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2108) that would extend the authorizations listed until October 1, 2014, or the date of 

the enactment of an act authorizing funds for military construction 

for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 2107). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill, 

Dahlonega, Georgia 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2109) that would require the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer certain Federal land 

administered as part of the Chattahoochee National Forest to the 

administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We believe that the current agreement between the Department 

of Agriculture and the Department of the Army related to an Army 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
723 

Ranger training area at Camp Frank D. Merrill in Dahlonega, 

Georgia, is inadequate to support the existing missions of the Department of the Army. We note that Secretary of the Army and the 

Secretary of Agriculture have entered into discussions to address 

procedures for management and administration of the property 

that we expect will ameliorate these concerns. We urge the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture to expeditiously conclude these discussions to preserve and enhance the 

training and military readiness capacity at Camp Frank D. Merrill. 

Lastly, we direct the Secretary of the Army to submit a report to 

the congressional defense committees on the status of negotiations 

not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act and summarizing the results of the negotiations not later than 90 days after 

an agreement is reached. 

Authorized Army construction and land acquisition project 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2901) that would authorize Army construction projects for fiscal year 2014 at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The provision would also require the Secretary of 

Defense to provide a brief to the congressional defense committees 

on infrastructure costs associated with continued detention operations at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and would require the President 

to provide a plan relating to detainees at Guantanamo Bay, future 

terrorist captures, and detainees held at the detention Facility at 

Parwan, Afghanistan. 

The Senate committee-reported bill did not contain a similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

TITLE XXII—NAVY MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary 

The Department of Defense requested authorization of appropriations of $1.7 billion for military construction and $463.2 million for 

family housing for the Department of the Navy for fiscal year 2014. 

The agreement includes the requested amounts. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2201) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2201) that would authorize military construction projects for the active component of 

the Navy for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2201). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
724 

Family housing (sec. 2202) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2202) that would authorize new construction and planning and design of family housing units for the Navy for fiscal year 2014. It would also authorize 

funds for facilities that support family housing, including housing 

management offices and housing maintenance and storage facilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2202). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2203) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2203) that would authorize funding for fiscal year 2014 to improve existing Navy family 

housing. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2203). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Authorization of appropriations, Navy (sec. 2204) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2204) that would authorize appropriations for the active component military construction and family housing projects of the Navy for fiscal year 2014. 

This provision would also provide an overall limitation on the cost 

of the fiscal year 2014 military construction and family housing 

projects authorized for the active duty component of the Navy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2204). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 

project (sec. 2205) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2206) that would modify the authorization contained in section 2201(b) of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of 

Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4441), for construction of Navy Central Command ammunition magazines in Bahrain. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2206). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 

project (sec. 2206) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2207) that would modify the authorization contained in section 2201(a) of the Military 

Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of 

Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) for construction of Explosives 

Handling Wharf No. 2 at Kitsap, Washington. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2205). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
725 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec. 

2207) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2208) that would extend the fiscal year 2011 authorization for two projects until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing 

funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is 

later. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2207) that would extend the fiscal year 2011 authorization for 

one project until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of 

an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 

2015, whichever is later and another similar provision (sec. 2208) 

that would extend the fiscal year 2011 authorization for one project 

until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, 

whichever is later. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 

2014 project 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2205) that would prohibit the Secretary of the Navy from obligating or expending any 

funds authorized for land acquisition related to the Townsend 

Bombing Range near Savannah, Georgia, until the Secretary certifies in writing to the congressional defense committees that the 

Secretary has entered into mutually-acceptable agreements with 

the governments of Long and McIntosh Counties, Georgia. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

The agreement includes an authorization of $61.7 million to acquire real estate interests as the first phase of an expansion of the 

Townsend Bombing Range in Georgia in order to support the training of Navy and Marine Corps aviators in air-to-ground employment of precision guided munitions. Considering the fact that the 

first phase of the expansion will require the purchase of approximately 20,000 acres from private entities, we expect that the Department of the Navy will continue efforts to engage community 

representatives from Long County, Georgia and McIntosh County, 

Georgia with the goal of achieving a mutually acceptable agreement regarding terms for the real property to be acquired for the 

expansion of the Townsend Bombing Range that protects and supports the mission of the range. 

TITLE XXIII—AIR FORCE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

Summary 

The Department of Defense requested authorization of appropriations of $1.1 billion for military construction and $464.9 million for 

family housing for the Air Force in fiscal year 2014. The agreement 

includes authorization of appropriations of $1.1 billion for military 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
726 

construction and $464.9 million for family housing for fiscal year 

2014. 

The budget request included $192.7 million for KC–46A Main 

Operating Base (MOB) #1 facilities and $63.0 million for KC–46A 

Formal Training Unit (FTU) facilities at unspecified locations. On 

May 22, 2013, the Air Force announced McConnell Air Force Base, 

Kansas, as its preferred alternative for the KC–46A MOB #1 and 

Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, as its preferred alternative for 

the KC–46A FTU. Concurrent with this announcement, the Air 

Force also requested an amendment to its budget request specifying location-specific requirements for KC–46A bed down, including $219.1 million for eight military construction projects at 

McConnell Air Force Base and $30.9 million for five military construction projects at Altus Air Force Base. The agreement reflects 

these amounts. 

The budget request included $12.0 million for a Main Gate Complex at Royal Air Force Station Croughton, United Kingdom. The 

House bill included no funding for this project and the report accompanying the House bill (H. Rept. 113–102) directed the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to the congressional defense 

committees by September 30, 2013, regarding the costs and benefits of locating various intelligence functions at the installation. 

The required report has not been provided to the congressional defense committees and, therefore, the agreement includes no funding 

for this project. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2301) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2301) that would authorize military construction projects for the active component of 

the Air Force for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2301). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Family housing (sec. 2302) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2302) that would authorize new construction and planning and design of family housing units for the Air Force for fiscal year 2014. It would also authorize funds for facilities that support family housing, including 

housing management offices and housing maintenance and storage 

facilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2302). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
727 

Improvements to military family housing units (sec. 2303) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2303) that would authorize funding for fiscal year 2014 to improve existing Air Force 

family housing. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2303). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Authorization of appropriations, Air Force (sec. 2304) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2304) that would authorize appropriations for the active component military construction and family housing projects of the Air Force for fiscal year 

2014. This provision would also provide an overall limitation on the 

cost of the fiscal year 2014 military construction and family housing projects authorized for the active duty component of the Air 

Force. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2304). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Limitation on project authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 

2014 project (sec. 2305) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2306) that would limit 

the Secretary of the Air Force from expending any funds authorized by this title that are associated with the construction of a 

maintenance facility, a hazardous cargo pad, or an airport storage 

facility at Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, until the Secretary certifies that the Department of the Air 

Force will purchase the requisite real estate necessary to support 

these projects. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would limit funds for the construction of projects in fiscal year 

2014 to support divert field operations in the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands until the Secretary of the Air Force provides a summary of alternatives considered, a description of the 

overall construction requirements, and a comparison of the costs 

and benefits of leasing compared to purchasing real estate to support the divert field requirements. 

In addition, we note that the Governor of the Commonwealth of 

the Northern Mariana Islands has expressed concerns regarding 

the proposed location of the divert field and whether it should be 

sited on Saipan or Tinian. As such, we expect the Secretary of the 

Air Force to consult with the Governor of the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands regarding the location of projects to support divert field operations with the goal of achieving a mutually 

agreeable solution. 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 

project (sec. 2306) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2305) that would increase the construction scope associated with a Fuel Systems MainVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00759 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
728 

tenance Hangar authorization at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, 

provided in the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239), to $128.0 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project (sec. 

2307) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2307) that would extend the authorization listed until October 1, 2014, or the date of 

the enactment of an act authorizing funds for military construction 

for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2305). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

TITLE XXIV—DEFENSE AGENCIES MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

BUDGET ITEMS

Summary 

The Department of Defense (DOD) requested authorization of appropriations of $4.0 billion for military construction for the defense 

agencies, $150.0 million for energy conservation projects, $122.5 

million for chemical demilitarization construction, and $57.6 million for family housing for the defense agencies for fiscal year 2014. 

The agreement includes authorization of appropriations of $3.4 billion for military construction, $150.0 million for energy conservation projects, $122.5 million for chemical demilitarization construction, and $57.6 million for family housing for the defense agencies 

for fiscal year 2014. 

The budget request included $431.0 million for the third increment of the High Performance Computing Center at Fort Meade, 

Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend the full 

amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, therefore, the 

agreement reflects a $35.0 million reduction. 

The budget request included $265.0 million for an Ambulatory 

Health Center at Fort Knox, Kentucky. We understand DOD would 

be unable to expend the full amount of the budget request in fiscal 

year 2014 and, therefore, the agreement reflects a $120.0 million 

reduction. 

The budget request included $210.0 million for replacement of 

the Public Health Command Laboratory at Aberdeen Proving 

Ground, Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, 

therefore, the agreement reflects a $135.0 million reduction. 

The budget request included $76.2 million for the second increment of the Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. We understand DOD would be unable to expend the full 

amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, therefore, the 

agreement reflects a $38.1 million reduction. The budget request included $251.2 million for the fifth increment of the Hospital Replacement at Fort Bliss, Texas. We underVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00760 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
729 

stand DOD would be unable to expend the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, therefore, the agreement reflects 

a $152.1 million reduction. 

The budget request included $151.5 million for the third increment of the Medical Center Replacement at Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany. We understand DOD would be unable to expend 

the full amount of the budget request in fiscal year 2014 and, 

therefore, the agreement reflects a $75.0 million reduction. The budget request included $1.8 million for a Tour Bus Drop Off 

at the Pentagon Reservation, Virginia. We believe this project is 

unjustified given the current fiscal pressures facing DOD and does 

little to improve the safety of visitors to the Pentagon and, therefore, the agreement includes no funding for this project. The budget request included $85.0 million for the second increment of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense Systems Complex in 

Deveselu, Romania. We understand that this project was awarded 

significantly below the authorized level and, therefore, the agreement reflects a $5.0 million reduction. 

The budget request included $10.0 million for Contingency Construction. In light of unobligated balances in the Contingency Construction account from previous years, the agreement reflects a 

$10.0 million reduction. 

U.S. Special Operations Command Military Construction Requirements 

The budget request included a total of $32.9 million for three 

military construction projects that support Special Operations 

Forces (SOF) Resiliency and Human Performance Centers. 

The House bill did not authorize the three military construction 

projects because of concerns about duplication of existing physical 

fitness facilities provided by the military services and potential conflicts with medical care provided by the TRICARE Management Activity. 

The Senate committee-reported bill included the requested funds. 

The agreement includes the requested funds. 

We fully support the intent of the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) Preservation of the Force and Families 

(POTFF) initiative. However, we are concerned about the affordability of USSOCOM’s current plan for the POTFF and, specifically, its projected cost of almost $500.0 million, including $200.0 

million for military construction, across the future year’s defense 

plan (FYDP) in light of current budgetary pressures. We are also 

concerned about the adverse impact of prioritizing military construction investments to support the POTFF at the expense of 

other longstanding USSOCOM military construction requirements 

to recapitalize old and failing facilities. Lastly, we believe that 

USSOCOM Major Force Program 11 (MFP–11) military construction funds should only be used to fulfill ‘‘special operations-peculiar’’ facility requirements and should not be used to duplicate facilities provided by the military services. 

In order to better assess USSOCOM’s future military construction requirements, we direct the Secretary of Defense, concurrent 

with the budget request for fiscal year 2015, to provide the congressional defense committees with an assessment of military construcVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00761 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
730 

tion requirements for USSOCOM and those necessary to support 

the USSOCOM POTFF across the FYDP. This assessment shall include, at a minimum, the following: 

(1) The definition of ‘‘SOF-peculiar’’ as it applies to the use 

of USSOCOM MFP–11 funding to meet military construction 

requirements; 

(2) A description of the decision making process for determining whether a military construction project should be funded through MFP–11 or by the military services; 

(3) An assessment of the feasibility of military construction 

investments to support the POTFF initiative, as outlined in 

the FYDP, in light of current budgetary pressures; 

(4) The rationale for funding military construction projects in 

support of the POTFF initiative, as outlined in the FYDP, 

through MFP–11 as opposed to the budgets of the military 

services, including a description of any POTFF military construction requirements that can be satisfied by the military 

services; 

(5) A prioritized list, by component, of military construction 

projects included in the FYDP that support the POTFF initiative, including cost and location; and 

(6) A detailed listing of all military construction facilities 

within USSOCOM that are failing or have exceeded their lifetime of use by component, by function, and by military base, 

and a detailed listing of all unfunded USSOCOM military construction requirements by component, function and military 

base. 

Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations 

Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2401) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2401) that would authorize military construction projects for the defense agencies for 

fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2401). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorized energy conservation projects (sec. 2402) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2402) that would authorize energy conservation projects for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2402). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
731 

Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies (sec. 2403) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2403) that would authorize appropriations for the construction and family housing 

projects of the defense agencies for fiscal year 2014. This provision 

would also provide an overall limitation on the cost of the fiscal 

year 2014 military construction and family housing projects authorized for the defense agencies. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2403). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations 

Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide (sec. 2411) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2411) that would authorize appropriations for military construction projects for the 

chemical demilitarization program for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2411). 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

TITLE XXV—NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY

INVESTMENT PROGRAM

Summary 

The Department of Defense requested authorization of appropriations of $239.7 million for military construction in fiscal year 2014 

for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment 

Program. The agreement includes authorization of appropriations 

of $200.0 million for military construction in fiscal year 2014 for 

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 

We understand that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program has expended prior year funds more 

slowly than anticipated and does not require the full requested 

amount for fiscal year 2014. Therefore, the agreement reflects a 

$40.0 million reduction. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ADOPTED

Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects (sec. 

2501) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2501) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to make contributions to the North 

Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program in an 

amount equal to the sum of the amount specifically authorized in 

section 2502 of this title and the amount of recoupment due to the 

United States for construction previously financed by the United 

States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 2501). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
732 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Authorization of appropriations, NATO (sec. 2502) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2502) that would authorize the U.S. contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2502). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

TITLE XXVI—GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

Summary 

The Department of Defense requested authorization of appropriations of $693.3 million for military construction in fiscal year 2014 

for facilities for the guard and reserve components. The agreement 

includes authorization of appropriations of $688.3 million for military construction in fiscal year 2014 for facilities for the guard and 

reserve components. 

The budget request included $29.0 million for Planning and Design for Army National Guard facilities. In light of unobligated balances in the Planning and Design accounts from previous years, 

the agreement reflects a $5.0 million reduction. 

Subtitle A—Project Authorizations and Authorization of 

Appropriations 

Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2601) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2601) that would authorize military construction projects for the Army National Guard 

for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2601). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects 

(sec. 2602) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2602) that would authorize military construction projects for the Army Reserve for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2602). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
733 

Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction 

and land acquisition projects (sec. 2603) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2603) that would authorize military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and the 

Marine Corps Reserve for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2603). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2604) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2604) that would authorize military construction projects for the Air National Guard 

for fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2604). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition 

projects (sec. 2605) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2605) that would authorize military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve for 

fiscal year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2605). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

We note the authorized amounts are listed in this provision on 

an installation-by-installation basis. A State list of projects contained in the table in section 4601 of this Act provides the binding 

list of specific construction projects authorized at each location. 

Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve (sec. 

2606) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2606) that would authorize appropriations for the reserve component military construction projects for fiscal year 2014. This provision would also provide 

an overall limitation on the cost of the fiscal year 2014 military 

construction projects authorized for the reserve components. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2606). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would prohibit obligation or expenditure of authorized 

funds for military construction projects associated with the 175th 

Network Warfare Squadron Facility at Fort Meade, Maryland, or 

the Cyber/ISR Facility at Martin State Airport, Maryland, until the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
734 

Secretary of Defense makes several certifications to the congressional defense committees. 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 

project (sec. 2611) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2611) that would modify the authority provided by section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public 

Law 112–239) and authorize the Secretary of the Navy to make 

certain modifications to the scope of a previously authorized construction project. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2611). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects (sec. 

2612) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2612) that would extend the authorizations for three fiscal year 2011 projects until October 1, 2014, or the date of the enactment of an act authorizing 

funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is 

later. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained two similar provisions (sec. 2612 and sec. 2613) that would extend the fiscal year 

2011 authorization for two projects until October 1, 2014, or the 

date of the enactment of an act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015, whichever is later. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

TITLE XXVII—BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACTIVITIES

Summary 

The Department of Defense requested $451.4 million for the ongoing cost of environmental remediation and other activities necessary to continue implementation of the 1988, 1991, 1993, 1995, 

and 2005 Base Realignment and Closure rounds. The agreement 

includes the requested amount. 

Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations 

Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure 

activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure 

Account (sec. 2701) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2701) that would authorize appropriations for ongoing activities that are required to 

implement the decision of base realignment and closure activities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2701). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
735 

Subtitle B—Other Matters 

Prohibition on conducting additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round (sec. 2711) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2711) that would prohibit funds, appropriated pursuant to an authorization of appropriations contained in this Act, to be used to propose, plan for, or 

execute an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 

round. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2702) that would establish, as a precondition for the authorization 

of a future BRAC round, a requirement for the Department of Defense to submit to Congress a formal review of overseas military 

facility structure. 

The agreement includes a provision that would make clear that 

nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize a future BRAC 

round. 

We note that the agreement also reduces the budget request by 

$8.0 million in Operation and Maintenance, defense-wide requested 

by the Department to ‘‘develop recommendations and manage a 

new BRAC round.’’ 

Elimination of quarterly certification requirement regarding availability of military health care in National Capital Region (sec. 

2712) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2712) that would repeal a quarterly reporting requirement regarding the capacity of 

the military health care system in the National Capital Region. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Report on 2005 base closure and realignment joint basing initiative 

(sec. 2713) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2703) that would require the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense 

for Installations and Environment to submit a report to the congressional defense committees on the 2005 BRAC joint basing initiative. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Consideration of the value of services provided by a local community to the Armed Forces as part of the economic analysis in 

making base realignment or closure decisions 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2713) that would require the Secretary of Defense to include an accounting of the 

value of services that are provided by the local community to the 

military as part of the economic analysis conducted in making any 

base realignment or closure decision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
736 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We believe that to the extent services provided by a local community directly reduce the cost of Department of Defense operations 

at a particular installation, such savings should be included in the 

evaluation of the fiscal consequences of proposed base closures and 

realignments under sections 993 and 2687 of title 10, United States 

Code. We note that sections 993 and 2687 of title 10, United States 

Code, apply to the Department’s authorities to carry out base closures and realignments below certain thresholds, not a formal base 

realignment and closure process which would have to be specifically authorized by Congress. 

TITLE XXVIII—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family 

Housing Changes 

Modification and extension of authority to utilize unspecified minor 

military construction authority for laboratory revitalization 

projects (sec. 2801) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2801) that would modify section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, and allow the 

threshold of the unspecified minor construction (UMMC) project to 

be adjusted based on area cost factors and modify several unspecified minor military construction thresholds. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would modify the UMMC threshold for the use of Operation 

and Maintenance funds for laboratory revitalization projects from 

$2.0 million to $4.0 million and extend the underlying authority 

from 2016 to 2018. The agreement does not include any other 

changes to UMMC thresholds or area cost factor adjustments. 

We note that, historically, the Department of Defense laboratory 

enterprise has not received adequate attention with regard to the 

revitalization of its infrastructure. Given that the laboratory enterprise is crucial to the development of future technologies that provide our warfighters a decisive technological edge on the battlefield, 

we strongly encourage the Department to place a higher priority on 

the revitalization and modernization of infrastructure across the 

laboratory enterprise. 

Repeal of separate authority to enter into limited partnerships with 

private developers of housing (sec. 2802) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2803) that would repeal the limited authority of the Department of Defense to enter 

into partnerships with private developers for the purpose of providing family housing construction. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
737 

Military construction standards to improve force protection (sec. 

2803) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2804) that would provide additional latitude to the Department of Defense (DOD) to 

apply local threat criteria in the design and construction of DOD 

facilities. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to 

the congressional defense committees on current expeditionary 

physical barrier systems and new technologies that can be used for 

force protection and to provide blast protection. 

Application of cash payments received for utilities and services (sec. 

2804) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2805) that would authorize the secretaries of the military departments, beginning fiscal 

year 2014, to credit cash payments received as compensation for 

utilities or services provided to eligible entities that operate family 

or military unaccompanied housing projects to the appropriation or 

working capital account currently available for the purpose of furnishing such utilities or services. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2812). 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Repeal of advance notification requirement for use of military housing investment authority (sec. 2805) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2806) that would repeal a notification required by section 2875 of title 10, United 

States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Additional element for annual report on military housing privatization projects (sec. 2806) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2807) that would provide additional oversight and accountability in the pursuit of military family housing privatization projects to include an assessment 

of litigation costs that are being pursued by the privatization partners. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Policies and requirements regarding overseas military construction 

and closure and realignment of United States military installations in foreign countries (sec. 2807) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2801) that would require all future military construction projects 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
738 

funded using in-kind payments pursuant to bilateral agreements 

with partner nations be submitted for congressional authorization 

in the Military Construction Authorization Act. The provision 

would also require that DOD include operational expenses funded 

through residual value payments in-kind in the budget justification 

documents submitted to Congress in connection with the annual 

budget request. 

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 2811) that 

would repeal section 2921 of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510) and consolidate the 

requirements of overseas basing notification process in section 

2687a of title 10, United States Code. This section would also remove a redundant reporting requirement associated with the proposed residual value of foreign military closure determinations. 

The agreement includes a provision that would combine the two 

provisions and make other clarifying and technical modifications to 

sections 2802 and 2867a of title 10, United States Code, relating 

to overseas basing. 

Extension and modification of temporary, limited authority to use 

operation and maintenance funds for construction projects in 

certain areas outside the United States (sec. 2808) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2808) that would 

amend section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136) and extend 

the Department of Defense’s ability to use operation and maintenance appropriations for military construction purposes in the 

United States Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility (AOR) and certain countries in the United States United 

States Africa Command (AFRICOM) AOR until September 30, 

2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2802) that would extend the authority and revise the list of 

countries in the AFRICOM AOR in which the authority may be 

used. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Additionally, we note that the process by which the Department 

of Defense receives an authorization from Congress for military 

construction projects required to support overseas contingency operations can be cumbersome and extend over a long period of time. 

We also note that the fast pace of contingency operations, changes 

in the number of military forces in theater, and the contributions 

of partner countries may result in a change to or elimination of a 

military construction requirement in the time between the request 

to Congress for an authorization and the actual award of a construction contract. In order to ensure that funds are not expended 

on projects that no longer satisfy a valid military requirement, we 

believe the Secretary of Defense should review the process by 

which contracts for military construction projects overseas in connection with a contingency operation, as defined in section 

101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code, are awarded and how 

such projects are carried out. This review should be conducted with 

the objective of developing a methodology to ensure that any 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
739 

changes in military requirements are taken into account when 

making decisions to construct, or continue constructing, a project. 

Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of 

responsibility (sec. 2809) 

The Senate committee-reported bill decreased authorization of 

appropriations from the budget request for military construction by 

$463.3 million for certain new military construction and family 

housing projects in the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) area of 

responsibility. 

The House bill contained no similar funding cuts. 

The agreement contains authorization of appropriations of $463.3 

million for the projects in EUCOM and includes a new provision 

that would prohibit the Secretary of Defense or a Secretary of a 

military department from awarding a contract for any new military 

construction and family housing project, with certain exceptions, in 

the EUCOM area of responsibility until the Secretary of Defense 

certifies to the congressional defense committees that the installations and specific military construction requirements authorized in 

this Act have been examined as part of the ongoing European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment, have been determined to be 

of an enduring nature, and most effectively meet military requirements at the authorized location. 

Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration 

Development of master plans for major military installations (sec. 

2811) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2809) that would require the consideration of additional elements as part of master 

plans for major military installations. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Authority for acceptance of funds to cover administrative expenses 

associated with real property leases and easements (sec. 2812) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2811) that would amend section 2667 of title 10, United States 

Code, to allow for the use of proceeds from leases and easements 

to be used to offset administrative costs incurred by the military 

departments in entering into and managing such leases and easements. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Modification of authority to enter into long-term contracts for receipt of utility services as consideration for utility systems conveyances (sec. 2813) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2813) that would amend section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, United 

States Code, by requiring the Secretary of a military department, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
740 

prior to conveying a utility system under this section, to obtain an 

independent estimate of the level of investment that should be required to maintain adequate operation of the utility system over 

the term of the conveyance. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Report on efficient utilization of Department of Defense real property (sec. 2814) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2809) that would require a report on the utilization of real property across the Department of Defense. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Conditions on Department of Defense expansion of Pin ̃ on Canyon 

Maneuver Site, Fort Carson, Colorado (sec. 2815) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2813) that would place 

conditions on the expansion of the Pin ̃ on Canyon Maneuver Site in 

Fort Carson, Colorado. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military 

Realignment 

Change from previous calendar year to previous fiscal year for period covered by annual report of Interagency Coordination 

Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment (sec. 2821) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2831) that would modify the reporting period for the annual Guam realignment report 

from calendar year to fiscal year. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2822). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Realignment of Marine Corps forces in Asia-Pacific Region (sec. 

2822) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2832) that would repeal section 2832 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2821) that would extend the prohibition on funds for construction 

activities to implement the realignment of Marine Corps forces 

from Okinawa, Japan, with certain exceptions. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would modify the conditions that must be met before 

funds may be obligated to implement the realignment of Marine 

Corps forces, provide specific exceptions for the use of U.S. and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
741 

Japanese funds, and direct the Secretary of Defense, as chairperson 

of the Economic Adjustment Committee (EAC), to convene the EAC 

to consider assistance necessary to support the preferred alternative for the relocation of Marine Corps forces to Guam. 

We note that the agreement includes $85.7 million for an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar for the Marine Corps at Andersen Air 

Force Base and provides a specific exception for the use of Japanese funds to carry out the construction of a utility and site improvement project based on assurances from the Navy that both 

projects have military value independent of the movement of Marines from Okinawa to Guam. Specifically, the construction description of the Aircraft Maintenance Hangar indicates the project ‘‘supports an enduring support requirement for 1st MAW [Marine Aircraft Wing] squadrons that frequently deploy to Guam for training 

as part of the bilateral ‘‘Aviation Training Relocation’’ (ATR) agreement.’’ With regard to the Japanese-funded utility and site improvement project on the North ramp of Andersen Air Force Base, 

the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, 

Installations, and Environment indicated in an October 28, 2013, 

letter that the ‘‘project supports current and future training requirements that will increase the operational readiness of units in 

the Pacific Command Area of Responsibility consistent with the 

Combatant Commander’s theater objectives and requirements 

while depressurizing training airspace in Japan.’’ 

We note that the draft Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement for the siting of a cantonment area and training range 

to support the 4,700 Marines to be stationed or deployed to Guam 

on a rotational basis should be released in early 2014. As such, we 

strongly encourage the Department to complete, as quickly as possible, the master plan for Guam, including detailed descriptions of 

scope, cost estimates, and timing for each military construction 

project needed to support the relocation of Marines to Guam so 

that Congress will be able to assess the affordability, feasibility, 

and strategic value of the plan. Until then, we believe it is important to ensure that any funds provided by the Governments of 

Japan or the United States are spent on new facilities that will satisfy valid military requirements. We believe this approach mitigates the risk of approving the construction of facilities that have 

not yet been justified within the context of a master plan or for 

which an Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision 

have not been rendered. 

Subtitle D—Land Conveyances 

Real property acquisition, Naval Base Ventura County, California 

(sec. 2831) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2841) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to acquire 300 units of military 

family housing constructed under section 801 of the Military Construction Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–115) at Naval Base Ventura 

County, California. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 2814). 

The agreement includes the House provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
742 

Land conveyance, former Oxnard Air Force Base, Ventura County, 

California (sec. 2832) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2842) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey, without consideration, 

the Oxnard Air Force Base at Ventura, California, the Ventura 

County for public purposes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would ensure that any revenue resulting from the conveyance 

be used only for public airport purposes and provide for the reversion of such property to the Navy if it is determined it is not being 

used in accordance with the conveyance. 

Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii (sec. 

2833) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2831) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey approximately 11 acres of Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, 

to the Hale Keiki School in return for a cash payment, in-kind consideration, or a combination thereof, in an amount that is not less 

than the fair market value of the conveyed property. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision. 

Land conveyance, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania (sec. 2834) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2843) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to convey certain properties and 

improvements at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania, 

to the Philadelphia Regional Port Authority for fair market value. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Land conveyance, Camp Williams, Utah (sec. 2835) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2844) that would require the Secretary of the Interior to transfer 420 acres to the 

State of Utah for the purpose of permitting the Utah National 

Guard to use the conveyed land for military use. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would make the conveyance permissive and make other clarifying changes. 

Conveyance, Air National Guard radar site, Francis Peak, Wasatch 

Mountains, Utah (sec. 2836) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2845) that would authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to convey, without consideration, certain Air National Guard facilities at Francis Peak, Utah, 

for purposes of permitting the State of Utah to use the structures 

to support emergency public safety communications. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
743 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Land conveyances, former United States Army Reserve Centers, 

Connecticut, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania (sec. 2837) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2847) that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey, without consideration, 

to Derry Township, Pennsylvania, certain properties for the purpose of permitting the Township to use these properties for public 

purposes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would authorize the Secretary of the Army to convey other 

properties supporting former Army Reserve Centers. 

Subtitle E—Other Matters 

Repeal of annual Economic Adjustment Committee reporting requirement (sec. 2841) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2861) that would repeal an annual Economic Adjustment Committee report required 

by section 4004 of the Defense Economic Adjustment, Diversification, and Stabilization Act of 1990 (division D of Public Law 101– 

510). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Establishment of military divers memorial (sec. 2842) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2866) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to permit a third party to establish and maintain at the former Navy Dive School at the Washington Navy Yard a memorial to honor divers in the United States 

Armed Forces. Federal funds may not be used to design, procure, 

prepare, install, or maintain the memorial. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Repeal of requirements for local comparability of room patterns and 

floor areas for military family housing and submission of net 

floor area information 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2802) that would repeal section 2826 of title 10, United States Code, that required the 

Secretary concerned to acquire military family housing that is comparable in structure to family housing available in the local community. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
744 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Department of Defense report on Military Housing Privatization Initiative 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2807A) that would require the Secretary of Defense to issue a report to Congress on the 

Military Housing Privatization Initiative, including the details of 

any project where the project owner has outstanding local, county, 

city, town, or state tax obligations dating back over 12 months. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Continuation of limitation on use of funds for Leadership in Energy 

and Environmental Design (LEED) gold or platinum certification 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2821) that would continue the prohibition on the use of funds for Leadership in Energy 

and Environmental Design gold or platinum certifications for fiscal 

year 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We commend the Department for formalizing its new sustainable 

design criteria and policy governing investments in energy and 

water efficiency initiatives. As a result of the new policy, we expect 

all such investments going forward will be underpinned by a costbenefit analysis and reflective of local conditions. We believe that 

such an approach is critical to ensuring the cost-effective use of 

taxpayer dollars, especially in light of current budgetary pressures. 

Land conveyance, former Fort Monroe, Hampton, Virginia 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2846) that would require the Secretary of the Army to convey certain properties at 

Fort Monroe, Virginia, to the Commonwealth of Virginia. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that the Fort Monroe Authority has completed a reuse 

plan and is preparing an Economic Development Conveyance for 

consideration by the Secretary of the Army. We expect that continued active dialogue between both parties will result in a compromise for the timely conveyance of the remaining parcels at Fort 

Monroe to the Fort Monroe Authority. 

Naming Provisions 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2862) that would name 

the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies at Honolulu, Hawaii, 

as the ‘‘Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies’’ 

and make other conforming changes. The House bill also contained 

a provision (sec. 2863) that would rename the Graduate School of 

Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
745 

Sciences, as the ‘‘Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing’’ 

and make other conforming changes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

that would name the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies at 

Honolulu, Hawaii, as the ‘‘Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for 

Security Studies’’ and make other conforming changes (sec. 2841). 

The agreement does not include these provisions. 

We believe the naming of facilities, infrastructure, and/or programs is appropriately accomplished under existing Department of 

Defense (DOD) policies and procedures, including the request for 

legislative action, when necessary. We believe the naming of appropriate facilities, infrastructure, and/or programs would be a fitting 

tribute to the late Senator Daniel K. Inouye and would look favorably upon a request from DOD for legislative action to that effect, 

if required. 

Renaming site of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical 

Park, Ohio 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2864) that would modify the name of the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers Aviation 

Center to the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers National Museum, Dayton, Ohio. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Designation of Distinguished Flying Cross National Memorial in 

Riverside, California 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2865) that would authorize a memorial to members of the Armed Forces who have been 

awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross. The memorial is located 

at March Field Air Museum in Riverside, California, and would 

hereby be designated as the Distinguished Flying Cross National 

Memorial. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Inclusion of emblems of belief as part of military memorials 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 2867) that would 

amend chapter 21 of title 36, United States Code, allowing emblems of belief to be included in military memorials. Emblems of 

belief include all emblems authorized by the National Cemetery 

Administration. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

2832) that would authorize the Secretary of Defense to sell or exchange the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego, California, to an eligible entity on the condition that it continues to be 

maintained as a veterans’ memorial. 

The agreement does not include these provisions. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
746 

TITLE XXIX—WITHDRAWAL, RESERVATION, AND TRANSFER OF

PUBLIC LANDS TO SUPPORT MILITARY READINESS AND SECURITY

Short title (sec. 2901) 

The agreement includes a provision that would designate title 

XXIX of this Act as the ‘‘Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013.’’ 

Definitions (sec. 2902) 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide definitions for title XXIX of this Act. 

Subtitle A—General Provisions 

General applicability; definitions (sec. 2911) 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for the 

applicability and rules of construction of title XXIX of this Act. 

Maps and legal descriptions (sec. 2912) 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for the 

preparation of maps, legal descriptions, and other processes related 

to lands covered by this title. 

Access restrictions (sec. 2913) 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide authority 

for the Secretary concerned to impose certain restrictions on access 

to lands withdrawn and reserved by this title if required for military operations, public safety, or national security. 

Changes in use (sec. 2914) 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide authority 

for the Secretary concerned to authorize additional defense-related 

purposes for land withdrawn and reserved by this title. 

Brush and range fire prevention and suppression (sec. 2915) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3009) that would require the Secretary of the Army to take necessary precautions to 

prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range fires occurring 

as a result of military activities on the lands withdrawn by section 

3001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary concerned to take necessary precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range fires occurring as a result of 

military activities on land withdrawn and reserved by this title. 

Ongoing decontamination (sec. 2916) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3010) that would require the Secretary of the Army to maintain a program of decontamination on the withdrawn land provided by section 3001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary concerned to maintain, to the extent funds are available for 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
747 

such purposes, a program of decontamination of contamination 

caused by defense-related uses of land withdrawn and reserved by 

this title. 

Water rights (sec. 2917) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3008) that would retain water rights in existence prior to the withdrawal authorized 

in section 3001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would make clear nothing in this title establishes a new reservation of the United States 

with respect to any water or water right on land withdrawn and 

reserved by this title or affects any water rights acquired or reserved by the United States before the date of enactment of this 

Act. 

Hunting, fishing, and trapping (sec. 2918) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3007) that would require hunting, fishing and trapping on the lands withdrawn in section 3001 to be conducted in accordance with section 2671 of title 

10, United States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would apply section 

2671 of title 10, United States Code, to land withdrawn and reserved by this title. 

Limitation on extensions and renewals (sec. 2919) 

The agreement includes a provision that would require withdrawals and reservations established under this title to be extended or renewed only through a law enacted after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Application for renewal of a withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2920) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3011) that would require the Secretary of the Army, not later than 5 years before the 

termination of the withdrawal and reservation, to notify the Secretary of the Interior of a continuing defense-related need after the 

termination date for any land withdrawn and reserved by section 

3011. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary concerned, not later than 5 years before the termination of 

the withdrawal and reservation, to notify the Secretary of the Interior of a continuing defense-related need after the termination date 

for any land withdrawn and reserved by this title. 

Limitation on subsequent availability of land for appropriation (sec. 

2921) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3012) that would withdraw the lands transferred in section 3001 from all forms of appropriation under public land laws. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
748 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that prohibits previously 

withdrawn and reserved land from being open to any form of appropriation under the public land laws unless the Secretary of the 

Interior publishes an appropriate order in the Federal Register. 

Relinquishment (sec. 2922) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3013) that would provide authority and procedures for the Secretary of the Army to relinquish any or all of the lands withdrawn or reserved authorized 

in section 3001. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that provides a process for 

the Secretary concerned to relinquish land withdrawn and reserved 

by this title. 

Immunity of the United States (sec. 2923) 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide that the 

United States and its officers or employees shall be held harmless 

and shall not be liable for any injuries or damages to persons or 

property as a result of nondefense-related activities conducted on 

land withdrawn and reserved by this title. 

Subtitle B—Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana 

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2931) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3001) that would withdraw the lands described at Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana, for use by the Department of the Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for the 

withdrawal and reservation of public lands for Limestone Hills 

Training Area, Montana. 

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2932) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3002) that would require the Secretary of the Army to manage the lands withdrawn 

in section 3001 in accordance with the limitations and restrictions 

of section 3003. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Special rules governing minerals management (sec. 2933) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3003) that would establish additional rules governing mineral management at Limestone Hills Training Area, Montana. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
749 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Grazing (sec. 2934) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3004) that would require the Secretary of the Interior to continue and manage grazing 

permits and leases. The Secretary of the Interior, with the agreement of the Secretary of the Army, may delegate such authority to 

the Secretary of the Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Payments in lieu of taxes (sec. 2935) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3006) that would authorize the lands withdrawn in section 3001 to remain entitlement 

land under section 6901 of title 31, United States Code. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would deem land withdrawn by section 2931 to be entitlement land for purposes of section 6901 of title 31, United States Code. 

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2936) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3005) that would terminate the land withdrawal authorized in this subtitle on March 

31, 2039. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Subtitle C—Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine 

Palms, California 

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2941) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3052) that would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide for the Secretary of 

the Navy’s use of the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle 

Recreation Area twice in each calendar year for up to a total of 60 

days per year for certain purposes. Any agreement for the military 

use of the Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation 

Area shall terminate not later than March 31, 2039. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains a provision that would provide for the 

withdrawal and reservation of public land for the Marine Corps Air 

Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California. 

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2942) 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of the Navy to manage the land withdrawn by section 2941. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
750 

Public access (sec. 2943) 

The agreement includes a provision that would prohibit public 

access to the Exclusive Military Use Area unless otherwise authorized by the Secretary of the Navy. 

Resource management group (sec. 2944) 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy to establish a Resource Management Group for the land withdrawn and reserved by section 2941. 

Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area (sec. 2945) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3051) that would designate certain lands administered by the Secretary of the Interior 

in San Bernardino County, California, as the ‘‘Johnson Valley National Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.’’ This section would 

further withdraw the lands designated in this section from all 

forms of appropriation under public land laws. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2946) 

The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the 

withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 2941 on 

March 31, 2039. 

Subtitle D—White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, and Fort 

Bliss, Texas 

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2951) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3021) that would 

transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands located in 

Dona Ana County, New Mexico, from the Secretary of the Interior 

to the Secretary of the Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for the 

withdrawal of public land for White Sands Missile Range, New 

Mexico. 

Grazing (sec. 2952) 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretary of the Interior to continue and manage grazing permits and 

leases. The Secretary of the Interior, with the agreement of the 

Secretary of the Army, may delegate such authority to the Secretary of the Army. 

Subtitle E—Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery Range, California 

Transfer of administrative jurisdiction of public land (sec. 2961) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3041) that would 

transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands located in 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
751 

Imperial and Riverside Counties, California, from the Secretary of 

the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Management and use of transferred land (sec. 2962) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3042) that would authorize the Secretary of the Navy to use the lands transferred in 

section 3041 for military purposes. This section would also limit 

any diminution of these lands as critical habitat for the desert tortoise. Finally, this section would withdraw the lands transferred in 

section 3041 from all forms of appropriation under public land laws 

so long as the lands remain under the administrative jurisdiction 

of the Secretary of the Navy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Effect of termination of military use (sec. 2963) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3044) that would require that if the Secretary of the Navy determines that there is no 

longer a military need for the lands transferred by section 3041, 

the Secretary of the Navy shall assess the level of contamination 

and determine, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, 

whether decontamination is practical and economically feasible. If 

the Secretary of the Navy determines that decontamination is practical, the Secretary of the Navy shall provide funds for such decontamination. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Temporary extension of existing withdrawal period (sec. 2964) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3045) that would find 

that notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 806 of the California 

Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflight Act of 1994 (title VIII 

of Public Law 103–433), the withdrawal and reservation of land 

transferred under section 3041 shall not terminate until the date 

on which the land transfer required by section 3041 is executed. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Water rights (sec. 2965) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3046) that would retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3041. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
752 

The agreement includes the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. 

Realignment of range boundary and related transfer of title (sec. 

2966) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3043) that would authorize the realignment of the range boundary to ensure that the 

northwestern boundary of the Chocolate Mountain Aerial Gunnery 

Range shall be realigned to the edge of the Bradshaw trail so that 

the trail remains entirely under the jurisdiction of the Department 

of the Interior. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall not apply to any transfer provided by this 

section. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement contains the House provision with a clarifying 

amendment. We note that the redrawn range boundary would include approximately 200 acres formerly acquired through the Land 

and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) or donation. It is our intent 

that the Secretary of the Navy transfer to the Secretary of the Interior acreage at least equal to the lands formerly acquired through 

the LWCF or donation. 

Subtitle F—Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California 

Withdrawal and reservation of public land (sec. 2971) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3031) that would 

transfer the administrative jurisdiction of certain lands located in 

Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, California, from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes provisions that would provide for the 

withdrawal and reservation of public land for Naval Air Weapons 

Station China Lake, California. 

Management of withdrawn and reserved land (sec. 2972) 

The agreement includes a provision that would provide for the 

management of withdrawn and reserved land for Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, California. 

Assignment of management responsibility to Secretary of the Navy 

(sec. 2973) 

The agreement includes a provision that would allow the Secretary of the Interior to assign management responsibility for withdrawn and reserved land for Naval Air Weapons Station China 

Lake, California, to the Secretary of the Navy. 

Geothermal resources (sec. 2974) 

The agreement includes a provision that would make clear that 

nothing in this subtitle affects geothermal leases issued by the Secretary of the Interior before the date of enactment of this Act or 

the responsibility of the Secretary of the Interior to manage and 

administer such leases. The provision would also clarify other auVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00784 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
753 

thorities and responsibilities of the Secretary of the Navy with regard to geothermal exploration and development. 

Wild horses and burros (sec. 2975) 

The agreement includes a provision that would make the Secretary of the Navy responsible for the management of wild horses 

and burros on land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971. 

Continuation of existing agreement (sec. 2976) 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the agreement between the Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy under 

section 805 of the California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–433) to continue until the earlier of a new agreement being reached or 1 year after the date of 

enactment of this Act. 

Management plans (sec. 2977) 

The agreement includes a provision that would require the Secretaries of the Interior and the Navy to update and maintain cooperative arrangements concerning land resources and land uses on the 

land withdrawn and reserved by section 2971. 

Termination of prior withdrawals (sec. 2978) 

The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the 

prior withdrawal and reservation of land under section 803(a) of 

the California Military Lands Withdrawal and Overflights Act of 

1994 (Public Law 103–433). 

Duration of withdrawal and reservation (sec. 2979) 

The agreement includes a provision that would terminate the 

withdrawal and reservation of public land made by section 2971 on 

March 31, 2039. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Water rights 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3022) that would retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3021. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Withdrawal 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3023) that would withdraw the lands transferred in section 3021 from all forms of appropriation under public land laws so long as the lands remain under 

the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
754 

Water rights 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3032) that would retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3031. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Withdrawal 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3033) that would withdraw the lands transferred in section 3031 from all forms of appropriation under public land laws so long as the lands remain under 

the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Southern Study Area, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, 

California 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3053) that would 

transfer certain lands in San Bernardino County, California, as 

generally depicted as the ‘‘Southern Study Area,’’ to be transferred 

from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of the Navy for 

military purposes. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Water rights 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3054) that would retain water rights in existence prior to the transfer of administrative jurisdiction authorized in section 3051. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY

PROGRAMS

Overview 

Title XXXI authorizes appropriations for atomic energy defense 

activities of the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014, including: the purchase, construction, and acquisition of plant and capital 

equipment; research and development; nuclear weapons activities; 

nuclear nonproliferation activities; naval nuclear propulsion; environmental cleanup; operating expenses; and other expenses necessary to carry out the purposes of the Department of Energy Organization Act (Public Law 95–91). This title authorizes appropriations in five categories: (1) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); (2) Defense environmental cleanup; (3) Other defense 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
755 

activities; (4) Defense nuclear waste disposal; and (5) Energy security and assurance. 

National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3101) that would au- thorize $11.8 billion for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), an increase of $212.0 million above the budget request. The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision (sec. 3101) that would authorize $11.5 billion for the NNSA, 

an increase of $80.0 million above the budget request. We agree to include a provision that would authorize $11.7 bil- lion, an increase of $72.8 million above the budget request. Within NNSA, the provision would authorize $7.9 billion for weapons activities, an increase of $40.8 million above the budget 

request; $2.2 billion for defense nuclear nonproliferation, an increase of $40.0 million above the budget request; $1.2 billion for 

naval reactors, the amount of the budget request; and $387.7 million for the Office of the Administrator, a decrease of $8.0 million 

below the budget request. 

Within weapons activities, for directed stockpile work the provi- sion would authorize $2.5 billion, an increase of $39.2 million above 

the budget request. For campaigns, the provision would authorize 

$1.7 billion, the amount of the budget request. For nuclear programs, the provision would authorize $744.5 million, the amount of 

the budget request. 

Within defense nuclear nonproliferation, for nonproliferation and 

verification research and development the provision would authorize $388.8 million, the amount of the budget request. For nonproliferation and international security, the provision would authorize $141.7 million, the amount of the budget request. For international nuclear materials protection and cooperation, the provision would authorize $369.6 million, the amount of the budget request. For fissile materials disposition, the provision would authorize $542.6 million, $40.0 million above the amount of the budget request. For the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, the provision 

would authorize $424.5 million, the amount of the budget request. 

Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3102) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 defense environmental 

cleanup activities at $4.9 billion. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 3102) that authorized appropriations at $5.0 billion. 

We agree to include a provision that would authorize appropriations at $5.0 billion. 

Other defense activities (sec. 3103) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3103) that would authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2014 other defense activities 

at $749.1 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 3103) that authorized appropriations at $749.1 million. 

We agree to include a provision that would authorize appropriations at $758.7 million, $9.6 million above the budget request. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
756 

BUDGET ITEM

Project 99–D–143, mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility 

The House bill proposed funding the mixed oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication facility at the fiscal year 2014 request of $320 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill proposed funding the project 

at $80.0 million above the fiscal year budget 2014 request as a way 

to stabilize the program at the fiscal year 2013 levels while a strategic review is being conducted. 

We agree to fund the construction project at $360.0 million, $40.0 

million above the fiscal year 2014 budget request. We note that 

this project has been fraught with cost overruns and program 

delays. In fiscal year 2012, a decision was made to cancel the feedstock facility, which was to reduce old pits from nuclear weapons 

into feedstock for the MOX fuel plant, at a cost of some $730.0 million being spent in designing the facility. The MOX fuel plant and 

related support facilities has risen from an initial cost estimate of 

$1.0 billion to $7.7 billion, and it is projected to be at least 3 years 

late in its initial operation in 2020. The Government Accountability 

Office estimates, through fiscal year 2036, that the total life cycle 

cost will exceed $24.2 billion, including actual costs of $5.2 billion 

for prior years (fiscal year 1999 to fiscal year 2012). Despite years 

of outreach to the nuclear industry, there is currently no agreement with any utility to use the MOX fuel and it is not yet clear 

whether commercial nuclear power plants will even accept the 

MOX fuel at market rates or whether the Department of Energy 

will have to subsidize, at taxpayers’ expense, the sale of the fuel 

to make it competitive with commercially produced low-enriched 

uranium. 

We believe the rising costs associated with the program, canceled 

facilities, missed deadlines, and questionable ability to produce fuel 

at market prices are unacceptable. We caution that further cost increases would undermine the feasibility and affordability of the 

program. We understand the Department is now undertaking a 

strategic review of the program and other alternatives. We expect 

to be fully briefed on this strategic review, including the new cost 

estimates and projected construction timeline, and what actions the 

Department is taking or will take to reign in the program costs 

and, if necessary, consider less costly alternatives for disposing of 

the plutonium from retire nuclear weapons. If the Department of 

Energy considers any future increases to the MOX facility, we expect those proposed increases to come from outside of budget function 050, which funds the Nation’s critical national security priorities. We believe the Department must make its national security 

activities its top priority in budgeting, and expect that critical National Nuclear Security Administration programs should not become the source of funds for future increases to the MOX program. 

Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations 

National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3101) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3101) that would authorize appropriations for the National Nuclear Security Administration for fiscal year 2014, including funds for weapons activities, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
757 

defense nuclear nonproliferation programs, naval reactor programs, 

and the Office of the Administrator, at the levels identified in section 4701 of division D of this Act. This section would also authorize several new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security 

Administration. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

Defense environmental cleanup (sec. 3102) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3102) authorizing appropriations for the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for 

defense environmental cleanup activities as specified in the funding 

table in section 4701. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 3102). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Other defense activities (sec. 3103) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3103) authorizing appropriations for the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2014 for 

other defense activities as specified in the funding table in section 

4701. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 3103). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations 

Clarification of principles of National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3111) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3111) that would 

amend section 3211 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401) to clarify the set of principles with which 

the National Nuclear Security Administration must carry out its 

operations and activities. Specifically, this section would add the 

requirement that all operations and activities of the Administration 

be conducted consistent with the principle of ‘‘ensuring the security 

of the nuclear weapons, nuclear material, and classified information in the custody of the Administration.’’ 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Cost estimation and program evaluation by National Nuclear Security Administration (sec. 3112) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3113) that would 

amend section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2537) to require that any independent cost estimate carried out 

pursuant to section 4217 be conducted by the Secretary of Defense, 

acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE). The Director would be authorized to delegate carrying out such cost estimates to other elements of the Department 

of Defense. This section would also provide the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator for Nuclear Security 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
758 

and acting through the Director of CAPE, the authority to conduct 

an independent cost assessment of any initiative or program of the 

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) that is estimated to cost more than $500.0 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3111) that would amend the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.) to establish an Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation within NNSA whose director 

would be Senate-confirmed. The Senate committee-reported bill 

also contained a provision (sec. 3118) that would require any cost 

estimates submitted pursuant to section 4217 of the Atomic Energy 

Defense Act be submitted in unclassified form, with a classified 

annex if necessary. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that changes the Director of the new office from a Senate-confirmed position to a Senior Executive Service position. The amendment eliminates the requirement for two deputy directors, and 

modifies several of the responsibilities and authorities of the Director, and would require a joint implementation plan for the new office to be submitted by the NNSA Administrator and the Director 

of DOD’s CAPE. 

Given the size of the NNSA’s Office of the Administrator of approximately 1,800 personnel, we believe that requiring the Director 

to be a Senior Executive Service officer is adequate to ensure seniority and credibility within the NNSA. Further, we believe that 

the joint NNSA–DOD implementation plan will be important to 

standing up this new office. We expect the DOD CAPE to play an 

active role in not only training personnel of the new NNSA office, 

but helping shape and ensure quality cost estimates and program 

evaluations during the early years of the new NNSA office. We understand that the work for cost estimation at the NNSA will have 

periods between major projects where the personnel from this office 

can assist the DOD CAPE on subject matter unique to the NNSA 

that is not present in the DOD CAPE office. We encourage as a 

matter of good government such collaboration. 

The credibility of the NNSA with Congress and other agencies of 

the Executive Branch has been hurt by high-profile failures in cost 

estimation and program evaluation. We expect the NNSA to embrace this new Cost Estimation and Program Evaluation office as 

a means to help regain its credibility. 

Enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk (sec. 

3113) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3115) that would provide the Secretary of Energy, given the critical national security 

function of the National Nuclear Security Administration and the 

Department’s Office of Intelligence functions, with the authority to 

take certain actions with regard to the protection of the supply 

chain of the Department of Energy (DOE). This authority would 

replicate the authority provided to the Department of Defense in 

section 806 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) and to the intelligence 

community in section 309 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–87). 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
759 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

containing technical changes. The amendment includes a sunset of 

the authority 4 years after the date of enactment, a notice to the 

appropriate committees within 7 days after a supply chain source 

exclusion determination is made, and a review on an annual basis 

(for 4 years) by the Comptroller General on the implementation of 

this section by the Department of Energy, including on the adequacy of resources available to perform supply chain source exclusion determinations. 

We note this authority is intended to be used when existing supply chain management authorities are not sufficient to protect the 

national security of the United States. Use of this authority by 

DOE is expected to be limited in frequency. We encourage DOE to 

partner with supply chain sources, to the extent practicable, to implement this authority. 

Limitation on availability of funds for National Nuclear Security 

Administration (sec. 3114) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3116) that would limit 

the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise 

made available for fiscal year 2014 for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) such that $139.5 million may not be 

obligated or expended until the Administrator for Nuclear Security 

submits to the congressional defense committees a detailed plan to 

achieve certain planned efficiencies and written certification that 

the planned efficiencies will be achieved. If the Administrator does 

not submit the plan or is unable to certify within 60 days of the 

date of the enactment of this Act that the efficiencies will be 

achieved, the Administrator would be required to submit a report 

to the congressional defense committees on the amount of planned 

efficiencies that will not be realized and any effects caused by 

planned but unrealized efficiencies in the Directed Stockpile Work 

and Nuclear Programs accounts. The limitation of funds for NNSA 

would not apply to funds authorized to be appropriated for Directed 

Stockpile Work, Nuclear Programs, or Naval Reactors, and should 

not result in reductions in Laboratory Directed Research and Development funding. Finally, the limitation on obligation of funds 

would not affect the authority of the Secretary of Energy to reprogram or transfer funding under sections 4702, 4705, and 4711 of 

the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2742, 2745, and 2751). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that provides a rule of construction that the funds limitation shall 

not be considered a specific denial of funds relative to the authorities associated with subsection (d)(2). The amendment also provides 

that the amount of funds limited by this section would be reduced 

by the amount the Administrator is able to certify has been saved 

through the planned efficiencies. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
760 

Limitation on availability of funds for Office of the Administrator 

for Nuclear Security (sec. 3115) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3117) that would limit 

the availability of funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act 

or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the National 

Nuclear Security Administration’s Office of the Administrator to 

not more than 75 percent until several statutorily required reports 

are submitted to Congress in 2013 and 2014. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

containing technical and clarifying changes. 

Establishment of Center for Security Technology, Analysis, Response, and Testing (sec. 3116) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3119) that would require the Administrator for Nuclear Security to establish a Center 

for Security Technology, Analysis, Testing, and Response within 

the nuclear security enterprise. The Center would be responsible 

for a range of activities, but would primarily serve to provide the 

Administrator, the Chief of Defense Nuclear Security, and the 

management and operating contractors of the nuclear security enterprise, a wide range of objective expertise on security technologies, systems, analysis, testing, and response forces. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would modify the name of the organization to the Center for 

Security Technology, Analysis, Response, and Testing (CSTART) 

and authorize the Administrator to provide additional duties to the 

center. 

Authorization of modular building strategy as an alternative to the 

replacement project for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research 

Building, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico (sec. 

3117) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3116) that would extend section 3144(c) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to 

permit consideration of a modular building strategy for engineering 

and design if it meets long term stockpile requirements. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would change the notice and wait requirement from 30 

to 60 days. The amendment would also add to the notification required by the Nuclear Weapons Council to the congressional defense committees such that it includes notification that the modular strategy: (1) meets requirements for implementation of a responsive infrastructure, including meeting plutonium pit production requirements; and (2) will achieve full operating capability for 

not less than two modular structures by not later than 2027. 

We are aware that further detail on requirements and plans for 

the modular approach are being developed and refined. We expect 

the Nuclear Weapons Council to keep Congress informed as the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
761 

modular approach is developed and implemented to meet requirements for pit production and a responsive infrastructure. Furthermore, we encourage the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the 

Nuclear Weapons Council to expeditiously carry out such efforts to 

both ensure construction of a responsive nuclear infrastructure and 

to enable a timely transition of nuclear operations out of decaying 

and increasingly unsafe facilities such as the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Building. Finally, we note the reprogramming action concerning unobligated funds for the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Nuclear Facility is still pending, and 

look forward to working with the Nuclear Weapons Council to resolve the deferred reprogramming proposal. 

Comparative analysis of warhead life extension options (sec. 3118) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3121) that would require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, acting 

through the Nuclear Weapons Council, to include several warhead 

life extension options through all of Phase 6.2 and all of Phase 6.2A 

of the Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension Program. The options are the W78–1 life extension and the W88–1 life extension. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 1043) that would require the Director of Cost Analysis and 

Program Evaluation to conduct a similar analysis of alternatives 

for the Joint W78/88–1 Warhead Life Extension Program. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that none of the funds may be obligated or expended for phase 6.3 

of the combined W78/88–1 warhead until 90 days after the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council submits a comparative analysis of the alternative options of life extending the W78–1 and the 

W88–1 systems individually, so as to compare to the cost to the 

combined W78/88–1 warhead system. 

We encourage the Administrator to leverage, for the purposes of 

this section, the NNSA Director for Cost Estimating and Program 

Evaluation created elsewhere in this Act, and, during the transition period when the capabilities of such Director are being stood 

up, to work jointly with the Department of Defense Office of Cost 

Assessment and Program Evaluation. 

Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions to carry out certain research projects (sec. 3119) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3123) that would extend section 646(g)(10) of the Department of Energy Organization 

Act (P.L. 95–91, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)), from September 30, 2015 to September 30, 2020. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Increase in construction design threshold (sec. 3120) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3117) that would increase the major capital construction design 

threshold for the National Nuclear Security Administration from 

$600,000 to $1.2 million to account for increased construction costs. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
762 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would increase the capital construction design threshold 

to $1.0 million. 

Subtitle C—Plans and Reports 

Annual report and certification on status of security of atomic energy defense facilities (sec. 3121) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3131) that would 

amend section 4506 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act to require 

that, not later than September 30 of each year, the Administrator 

of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) submit to 

the Secretary of Energy and to the congressional defense committees, a report detailing and certifying the status of the security of 

the nuclear security enterprise, including the status of the security 

of special nuclear material, nuclear weapons, and classified information at each nuclear weapons production facility and national security laboratory. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a similar provision 

(sec. 3113) that would require the Secretary of Energy to certify the 

that atomic energy defense facilities of the Department of Energy 

containing quantities of category I and II special nuclear material 

meet Department security requirements. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Administrator to certify to the Secretary of 

Energy that the NNSA facilities containing quantities of Category 

I and II special nuclear material meet NNSA and Department of 

Energy security standards and requirements and for those that do 

not, actions and timelines to correct any deficiency. The Secretary 

would be required to transmit this certification to the congressional 

defense committees with any comments of the Secretary by December 1 of each year. The amendment also requires the Secretary to 

certify to the congressional defense committees by December 1 each 

year that atomic energy defense facilities other than those of the 

NNSA containing quantities of category I and II special nuclear 

materials shall meet Department security standards and requirements and for those facilities that do not to develop a correction action plan with timelines to correct any deficiency. 

Modifications to annual reports regarding the condition of the nuclear weapons stockpile (sec. 3122) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3132) that would 

amend section 4205 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2525) to clarify requirements related to the statutorily required annual assessments regarding the condition of the nuclear weapons 

stockpile. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would modify the date that such assessments are due from the 

Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy to the President 

to February 1 of each year. The amendment would also require 

that, if the report containing such assessments is not be received 

by the Congress by March 15, the covered officials under section 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
763 

4205(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(b)) shall 

provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees to ensure information regarding the status of the stockpile is available 

to inform congressional oversight and provide timely input to the 

annual legislative cycle. 

Inclusion of integrated plutonium strategy in nuclear weapons 

stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan 

(sec. 3123) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3115) that would amend the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 

2521 et seq.) to provide for a long-term plutonium strategy for the 

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) as part of its 

Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan. Plutonium 

sustainment is at the core of the NNSA stockpile mission. This integrated plan would ensure the NNSA remains focused on its plutonium mission. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would eliminate the external review and incorporate the 

requirement for an integrated plutonium strategy into section 4203 

of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523). 

Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts (sec. 3124) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3120) that would 

amend section 3121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to clarify that, if a management and operating contract awarded by the Administrator for Nuclear Security is protested, the report required by such section to 

be submitted to Congress shall be submitted not later than 30 days 

after such protest is resolved. This section would also require any 

report under section 3121 to include a description of the assumptions used and analysis conducted to determine cost savings expected from the competition of the contract and exempt contracts 

for managing and operating facilities of the Naval Reactors Program from the requirements of section 3121. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3122) that would amend section 3121(e) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to reduce the number of reports by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that combines the two provisions, changes the existing 90-day reporting requirement for the GAO to 180 days, and provides flexibility to ensure the reporting requirements for both the National 

Nuclear Security Administration and the GAO do not interfere 

with any award protests. 

Modification of deadlines for certain reports relating to program on 

scientific engagement for nonproliferation (sec. 3125) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3123) that would amend section 3122(e) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to reVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00795 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
764 

quire a 30-day notice for extending the program on scientific engagement for non-proliferation to a new country. The provision 

gives the Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration a national security waiver of the requirement as long as 

there is a report filed within 30 days. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would add the Comptroller General to the program commencement report with its analysis by the Comptroller General due 

no later than 18 months after receipt of the report. 

Modification of certain reports on cost containment for uranium capabilities replacement project (sec. 3126) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3124) that would amend section 3123(f) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (P.L. 112–239) to change 

the Government Accountability Office reporting requirement from 

the end of project life to 1 year after the date of enactment in consultation with the congressional defense committees. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Plan for tank farm waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation (sec. 

3127) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3114) that would require the Secretary of Energy to submit a comprehensive plan 

through 2025 to the congressional defense committees by March 1, 

2014, for the safe and effective retrieval, treatment, and disposition 

of nuclear waste contained in the tank farms of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Richland, Washington. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would require the Secretary of Energy to submit a plan for 

tank farm waste at Hanford, including the activities necessary to 

start operations at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant 

(WTP) and activities necessary to design, construct, and operate 

the WTP and any related infrastructure facilities. The amendment 

would require the Secretary to identify any significant requirements needed to inform such activities and require the Secretary 

to determine whether such requirements are finalized. The Secretary would be authorized to change any such significant requirements that are determined to be finalized, but would require 

prompt congressional notification of such changes if they have significant material effect on the schedule or cost of the project. The 

plan would be required to be submitted to the congressional defense committees by June 1, 2014. 

Plan for improvement and integration of financial management of 

nuclear security enterprise (sec. 3128) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3112) that would require the Administrator of the National Nuclear 

Security Administration (NNSA) to develop a plan for a common 

cost structure between activities at different sites with the purpose 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
765 

of comparing how efficiently different sites within the NNSA complex are carrying out similar activities. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the Administrator to submit a plan for improving and integrating financial management of the nuclear security enterprise to the congressional defense committees not later 

than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. 

We direct the Comptroller General of the United States to review 

the plan submitted by the Administrator and brief the congressional defense committees within 60 days of submission of such 

plan by the Administrator on the adequacy of this plan in meeting 

the objectives set forth in this section and offer recommendations 

for improvement. 

Plan for developing exascale computing and incorporating such 

computing into the stockpile stewardship program (sec. 3129) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3114) that would add a new section to the Atomic Energy Defense 

Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) requiring the Administrator for Nuclear Security to develop and carry out a plan to incorporate 

exascale computing in the stockpile stewardship program. Such 

plan would be required to cover the 20-year period after the date 

of enactment of this Act, and would be submitted to the congressional defense committees annually. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment that would require the plan to include information on developing exascale computing, alter the timeframe for the plan to 10 

years after enactment of this Act, and require inclusion of milestones to be achieved to mitigate disruptions resulting from the 

transition to exascale computing. The amendment would also require that the Future-Years Nuclear Security Program, report submitted pursuant to section 3253 of the National Nuclear Security 

Administration (NNSA) Act (50 U.S.C. 2453), include a description 

of the costs borne by the NNSA, the Department of Energy’s Office 

of Science, other federal agencies, and industry to develop exascale 

computing. Finally, the amendment would eliminate the requirement for annual reporting on advances outside the United States 

in exascale computing and require that the plan required by this 

section be submitted with each summary of the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan submitted to the congressional defense 

committees in each even-numbered year pursuant to section 4203 

of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523). 

We understand the value of maintaining U.S. leadership in high 

performance computing and believe achieving exascale computing 

within the next decade must be a national goal. However, we note 

that NNSA’s top priority must remain sustainment and modernization of the nuclear weapons stockpile. High performance computing 

is an important capability that underpins these efforts via the 

stockpile stewardship program, but the costs of achieving exascale 

computing must not be borne by NNSA alone. Due to the broad 

benefits exascale would bring to the Federal Government and the 

U.S. economy in general, we encourage the Administrator to partVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00797 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
766 

ner with and leverage other stakeholders in government and industry. 

Study and plan for extension of certain pilot program principles 

(sec. 3130) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3122) that would make 

a series of findings related to a pilot program conducted by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) at the Kansas City 

Plant (KCP) starting in April 2006, and would require the Administrator for Nuclear Security to extend the principles of such pilot 

program. The Administrator would be required to implement the 

principles of the pilot program permanently at the Kansas City 

Plant and extend the principles of the pilot program, with modifications as the Administrator determines appropriate, to not less than 

two additional facilities of the nuclear security enterprise within 1 

year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

requiring a study of the feasibility of extending the Kansas City 

Plant pilot program to other National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) sites with a report to Congress within 180 days after 

enactment on the results of the study and a determination of 

whether the principles will be extended. We do not mandate extending the principles. We also note the on-going work by Comptroller General of the United States to assess the risks, benefits 

and applicability of extending the pilot program to other facilities. 

Given the success of the pilot program at the Kansas City Plant, 

we direct the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Secretary 

of Energy to ensure, to the greatest extent possible, that these 

principles are permanently implemented at the Kansas City Plant. 

Study of potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries (sec. 3131) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3142) that would require the Administrator for Nuclear Security, not later than 60 

days after the date of the enactment of this Act, to conduct a study 

of the potential reuse of nuclear weapon secondaries. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Repeal of certain reporting requirements (sec. 3132) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3133) that would repeal two statutes requiring submission of annual, recurring reports: (1) a report on Counterintelligence and Security Practices at 

National Laboratories required by section 4507 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2658); and (2) a report on Advanced 

Supercomputer Sales to Certain Foreign Nations contained in section 3157 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

1998 (Public Law 105–85). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

containing technical corrections. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
767 

Subtitle D—Other Matters 

Clarification of role of Secretary of Energy (sec. 3141) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3143) that would clarify that the amendment made by section 3113 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) 

to section 4102 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2512) 

may not be construed to affect the authority of the Secretary of Energy, in carrying out national security programs, with respect to 

the management, planning, and oversight of the National Nuclear 

Security Administration, or as affecting the delegation by the Secretary of Energy of authority to carry out such activities, as set 

forth under subsection (a) of section 4102, as it existed before the 

amendment made by section 3113. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with a technical 

amendment. 

Modification of deadlines for Congressional Advisory Panel on the 

Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise (sec. 3142) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3141) that would 

amend section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to modify statutory deadlines regarding the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise. The advisory panel’s interim report would be due by October 1, 2013, instead of 180 days 

after enactment of Public Law 112–239. Also, the advisory panel’s 

full report would be due March 1, 2014, instead of February 1, 

2014. Finally, the advisory panel would terminate not later than 

September 30, 2014, instead of June 1, 2014. This section would 

also enable the advisory panel to submit a final report on its activities and recommendations prior to termination. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3125) that would amend section 3166(d)(1) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239) to extend the date of the interim report from 180 days after the date 

of enactment to 180 days after the first meeting of the advisory 

panel. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would change the interim report due date to March 1, 2014 

with the full report due by July 1, 2014. 

Department of Energy land conveyance (sec. 3143) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3146) that would convey in fee simple, excess land from the Hanford Reservation to the 

Hanford Community Re-Use Organization. 

The Senate committee-passed bill had no similar provision. 

The agreement includes a provision authorizing the transfer of 

the Bannister Federal Complex, Kansas City Missouri, from the 

General Services Administration to the National Nuclear Security 

Administration (NNSA), which may convey for consideration the 

real property using existing Department of Energy regulations. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
768 

We request monthly reports on the status of the conveyance of 

Hanford land to the Hanford Community Re-Use Organization. 

In addition, we request a monthly report on the status of conveying the land at the Hanford reservation to the Hanford Community Re-Use Organization. 

Technical amendment to Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (sec. 3144) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3144) that would make 

a technical amendment to chapter 10 of the Atomic Energy Act of 

1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.). 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Technical corrections to the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (sec. 3145) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3131) that would amend the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2401 et. seq.) with technical and clarifying corrections. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Technical corrections to the Atomic Energy Defense Act (sec. 3146) 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3132) that would amend the Atomic Energy Defense Act (42 U.S.C. 

2501 et. seq.) with technical and clarifying corrections. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the Senate provision with an amendment containing technical and conforming changes. 

Sense of Congress on B61–12 life extension program (sec. 3147) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3118) that would express the sense of Congress that, particularly in a constrained 

budget environment, the National Nuclear Security Administration 

(NNSA) should prioritize its primary mission of sustaining and 

modernizing the nuclear weapons stockpile and, if required, shift 

funding from secondary missions to ensure critical nuclear weapons 

modernization programs stay on schedule and deliver nuclear warheads needed to support military requirements. This section would 

also require that, of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this 

Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014 for the Global 

Threat Reduction Initiative of the NNSA, not more than 80 percent 

may be obligated or expended unless, by not later than 60 days 

after the date of enactment, the NNSA Administrator certifies to 

the congressional defense committees that the B61 Life Extension 

Program will deliver a first production unit in fiscal year 2019. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision with an amendment 

that would express a sense of Congress that the B61–12 Life Extension Program is a high priority of the NNSA; that, if necessary 

to avoid delays, funds should be shifted from other programs to ensure the B61–12 Life Extension Program stays on schedule; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
769 

that further delays to the program would undermine the credibility 

and reliability of the nation’s nuclear deterrent and the extended 

deterrent provided by the United States to allies. 

Sense of Congress on establishment of an advisory board on toxic 

substances and worker health (sec. 3148) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 1027) that would express the sense of Congress that the President should establish an 

Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health as part of 

the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Program. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS NOT ADOPTED

Energy security and assurance 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3104) that would authorize appropriations for energy security and assurance programs 

for fiscal year 2014, at the levels identified in section 4701 of division D of this Act. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision as both budget tables in section 4701 authorized no funding for the program. 

Termination of Department of Energy Employees to Protect National 

Security 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3112) that would authorize the Secretary of Energy to terminate an employee of the 

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) or any element 

of the Department of Energy (DOE) that involves nuclear security 

if the Secretary determines the employee acted in a manner that 

endangers the security of special nuclear material or classified information. To exercise such authority, the Secretary would have to 

consider the termination to be in the interests of the United States 

and determine that the termination procedures prescribed by other 

provisions of law cannot be invoked in a manner that the Secretary 

considers consistent with national security. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include the provision. 

We understand that, following the July 2012 security breach at 

the Y–12 National Security Complex by several anti-nuclear activists, including an octogenarian nun, several federal employees were 

reassigned or allowed to retire. However, no federal employees 

have been terminated from federal service. We find this lack of robust accountability to be unacceptable and dangerous. Multiple reviews since the incident have found failures at every level contributed to this incident, and that there has been a distinct failure to 

take corrective actions identified by previous security incidents. 

For example, senior leaders in the Department of Energy’s Office 

of Health, Safety, and Security have held top security policy and 

oversight positions for well over a decade despite repeated security 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
770 

failures during this tenure. These same senior leaders are now 

inexplicably being counted on to implement reforms. This is despite 

the fact that this same office conducted a review of Y–12’s physical 

security systems just 2 months prior to the July 2012 break-in and 

gave Y–12’s security a clean bill of health. This lack of accountability, whether at senior levels or throughout the DOE, is outrageous and must not be tolerated. 

It is also contrary to the strong leadership and accountability example set by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates in 2008 when he 

fired several top Air Force officials for significant and repeated nuclear weapon security failures. Unlike DOE, Secretary Gates sent 

a strong message to the Air Force that continuation of the failures 

would not be tolerated and officials at all levels were accountable 

for failure. Senior officials from the Department of Energy have indicated that federal employment laws and regulations prevented or 

severely impeded termination of any federal employees in response 

to the Y–12 incident. If true, we believe the inability of the Secretary of Energy to fire federal employees for major security failures would represent a critical problem and national security risk. 

Therefore, we direct the Secretary of Energy to submit a report to 

the congressional defense committees by March 15, 2014, on the 

authorities available to the Secretary to terminate federal employees. Such report should include a description of the authorities 

available and describe in detail why such authorities were insufficient to terminate employees in the aftermath of the Y–12 incident. 

The report should also include a list of the officials in the DOE and 

NNSA structure that had responsibility for security at Y–12 in July 

2012, a description of any disciplinary actions taken with respect 

to such officials, and such officials’ current positions. Finally, the 

report should also provide a description of the Secretary’s views on 

accountability for security failures, whether actions taken in response to the Y–12 incident conform to these views, and how these 

views will be applied in the future. 

Assessment of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National 

Nuclear Security Administration 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3121) that would require the National Nuclear Security Administration to undergo a review of their nuclear nonproliferation programs by the National Academies of Science. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

The Comptroller General of the United States is directed to provide a report to the congressional defense committees assessing the 

existing and future nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration. The report shall include 

the following elements: 

(1) An assessment of the threat of nuclear proliferation, including fissile materials, technology and expertise related to 

nuclear weapons, plutonium reprocessing and uranium enrichment. 

(2) The status of nuclear nonproliferation programs of the 

National Nuclear Security Administration as of the date of the 

enactment of this Act. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
771 

(3) An assessment of whether those programs are meeting 

the goals of those programs and reducing the assessed threat 

of nuclear proliferation including: Preventing nuclear terrorism 

by securing and removing highly-enriched uranium and plutonium worldwide; converting research reactors from highly-enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium in Russia and other 

countries; providing radiation detection capability at ports and 

borders; securing and removing radiological materials worldwide; developing and improving technology to detect nuclear 

proliferation and nuclear weapons detonation, to verify foreign 

commitments to treaties and agreements with respect to nuclear weapons, and detect the diversion of materials, including 

safeguards technology; and preventing and countering the proliferation and use of nuclear weapons (including materials, 

technology and expertise). 

(4) The extent of the work remaining for those programs to 

meet those goals, including an estimated timeline and costs 

and what gaps remain in those goals. 

(5) The nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National 

Nuclear Security Administration and nuclear cooperation 

agreements with countries that have obtained nuclear weapons 

and are not parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of 

Nuclear Weapons, done at Washington, London, and Moscow 

July 1, 1968, and entered into force March 5, 1970 (21 UST 

483) (commonly known as the ‘‘Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty’’). 

(6) The nuclear nonproliferation programs of the National 

Nuclear Security Administration and nuclear cooperation 

agreements with countries that are non-nuclear weapon state 

parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and are acquiring nuclear materials in violation of commitments under the 

Treaty. 

(7) The status, level of, and gaps related to, coordination of 

the programs of the NNSA and the Department of Energy with 

other agencies and departments of the Federal Government 

that have nuclear nonproliferation responsibilities. 

(8) In addition, the report shall include an assessment of the 

budget requirements of the NNSA, including the costs associated with the implementation of nuclear nonproliferation programs, to reduce the threat of nuclear proliferation. 

We are cognizant that this report may require a significant effort 

by the Government Accountability Office. The Comptroller General 

of the United States shall provide quarterly updates on the status 

of the report with a final report due no later than August 31, 2015. 

Government Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Extension 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3145) that would permit government owned non-defense transuranic waste to be disposed of in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant subject to meeting the 

waste acceptance criteria outlined in ‘‘Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant,’’ dated April 21, 

2011, published by the Department of Energy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
772 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

Manhattan Project National Historic Park 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3147) that would establish as a unit of the National Park System a series of historical 

sites associated with the Manhattan Project at facilities administered by the Department of Energy. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD

Authorization (sec. 3201) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3201) that would authorize the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board at $29.915 million. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Improvements to the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3202) that would 

amend section 315 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 

2286d) to enable the Secretary of Energy to request an analysis regarding the costs and benefits of any draft or final recommendation 

of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB). If the Secretary requests such an analysis, the Board would be required to 

transmit such an analysis to the Department of Energy (DOE) 

within 30 days and make such analysis public when the associated 

recommendation is made available to the public. Additionally, if 

the Secretary requests such an analysis from the Board, the Secretary would be required to conduct a similar analysis of the costs 

and benefits of the recommendation and make such analysis available to the public. The provision would also amend section 312 of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (U.S.C. 2286a) to clarify that, in 

making recommendations to the Secretary of Energy, the Board 

must use rigorous, quantitative analysis and specifically assess the 

use of various administrative, passive, and engineered controls for 

implementing the recommended measures. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

We note that a variety of independent assessments in recent 

years have indicated that DNFSB oversight, coupled with DOE’s 

history of not challenging DNFSB recommendations, have contributed to increasing costs within the nuclear security enterprise that 

may achieve comparatively small safety benefits. For instance, a 

2011 study of two major DOE defense nuclear facility construction 

projects by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (USD AT&L) found that ‘‘the current process 

involving oversight by the DNFSB is not working well. Differing inVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:57 Feb 12, 2014 Jkt 086280 PO 00000 Frm 00804 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\D280.XXX D280

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
773 

terpretations of DOE regulations between the DNFSB, and the 

DOE and its contractors have diverted attention and resources for 

arguably increased safety.’’ The study found that, ‘‘in certain cases, 

the DOE has failed to ‘push back’ on DNFSB recommendations 

that don’t cost-effectively buy down risk, creating conditions in 

which the DFNSB becomes a de facto program manager.’’ The USD 

AT&L report and the 2009 report of the bipartisan Commission on 

the Strategic Posture of the United States ultimately recommended 

eliminating DNFSB oversight in favor of regulation of DOE facilities by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

In 2005, a report by the Secretary of Energy’s Advisory Board 

(SEAB) concluded that, although the DNFSB only issues recommendations and not requirements, ‘‘their recommendations have 

the implicit status of requirements because of the current lack of 

a specific mechanism for implementation assessment.’’ The SEAB 

emphasized that an analysis of the costs of implementation, safety 

benefits, and risks of an idea should drive every decision and recommendation made to and within the enterprise, and suggested the 

DNFSB use this mechanism every time they make recommendations. In its Phase I report on Managing for High Quality Science 

and Engineering at the National Nuclear Security Administration 

(NNSA) laboratories, the National Academies of Science (NAS) concluded that ‘‘the role that non-regulatory agencies (particularly the 

DNFSB) have had on the laboratories is excessive. Although the 

Board lacks independent regulatory enforcement authority, it has 

issued more than 30 formal recommendations to the Secretary of 

Energy since 1990.’’ In its Phase II report in 2013, the NAS pointed 

out that ‘‘the DNFSB is an advisory body that does not directly impose regulations, although DOE and NNSA usually accept DNFSB 

recommendations.’’ The 2013 report also stated that safety assessments by overlapping oversight bodies, including the DNFSB, 

‘‘adds to the cost of conducting experiments and can slow or deter 

experimental work . . . Moreover, these assessments generally focus 

on the safety risks associated with particular experiments rather 

than weighing those risks against the benefits to be derived from 

the experiments and the risks to the nuclear weapons program 

from not conducting the experiments.’’ Most recently, in September 

2013 an assessment of the safety culture at NNSA found a perception among NNSA employees that ‘‘NNSA leadership is very reactive to the DNFSB and will make sudden changes rather than 

question or say no to the Board.’’ While we do not comment on individual cases or circumstances, we believe it is imperative that the 

Secretary of Energy assess the costs and benefits of any recommendation made by the DNFSB. We believe it is incumbent 

upon the Secretary to reject or request modifications to DNFSB 

recommendations if the costs of implementing the recommendations are not commensurate with the safety benefits gained. We 

note that existing statute provides the Secretary with this authority, and encourage the Secretary to use it, when appropriate. Risk 

acceptance, if considered carefully and transparently, is an important risk management practice. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
774 

TITLE XXXIV—NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVES

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 3401) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3401) that would authorize $20.0 million for fiscal year 2014 for the purpose of carrying 

out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the Naval Petroleum and Oil Reserves. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes the House provision. 

TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

Authorization of appropriations for national security aspects of the 

Merchant Marine for fiscal year 2014 (sec. 3501) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3501) that would authorize appropriations for the Maritime Administration of the Department of Transportation for those activities of the Maritime Administration associated with maintaining national defense sealift. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

5-year reauthorization of vessel war risk insurance program (sec. 

3502) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3502) that would extend the sunset date on the authorization to issue war risk insurance from December 31, 2015, to December 31, 2020. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Sense of Congress (sec. 3503) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3503) that would express the sense of Congress on the importance of the United States 

shipbuilding industry and specifically the Ready Reserve Force of 

the Maritime Administration to the national security needs of the 

United States. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Treatment of funds for intermodal transportation maritime facility, 

Port of Anchorage, Alaska (sec. 3504) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3504) that would modify the current language requiring that any funds provided for the 

federal share, and any funds provided for the non-federal share, for 

an intermodal transportation maritime facility at the Port of Anchorage, Alaska, must be transferred to the Administrator of the 

Maritime Administration. The provision would change current laws 

to a permission to transfer the funds, rather than a requirement 

to transfer the funds. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
775 

The agreement includes this provision. 

Strategic seaports (sec. 3505) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 3505) that would allow 

the Maritime Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of 

Defense, to give priority to providing funding to strategic seaports 

in support of national security requirements. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement includes this provision. 

LEGISLATIVE PROVISION NOT ADOPTED

Maritime Administration 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained a provision (sec. 

3501) that would re-authorize certain aspects of the Maritime Administration. 

The House bill contained no similar provision. 

The agreement does not include this provision. 

DIVISION D—FUNDING TABLES 

Authorization of appropriations (sec. 4001) 

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 4001) that would provide for the authorization of projects, programs, and activities in 

accordance with the tables in division D. 

The Senate committee-reported bill contained an identical provision (sec. 4001). 

The agreement includes this provision. 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

DISCRETIONARY AUTHORIZATIONS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE 

Function 051, Department of Defense-Military 

Division A: Department of Defense Authorizations 

Title I—Procurement 

Aircraft Procurement, Army ......................................... 5,024,387 3,939 5,028,326 

Missile Procurement, Army .......................................... 1,334,083 1,334,083 

Weapons & Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army .............. 1,597,267 5,561 1,602,828 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army .............................. 1,540,437 –84,800 1,455,637 

Other Procurement, Army ............................................. 6,465,218 –54,300 6,410,918 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy .......................................... 17,927,651 –52,248 17,875,403 

Weapons Procurement, Navy ....................................... 3,122,193 –12,050 3,110,143 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy & Marine Corps ... 589,267 589,267 

Shipbuilding & Conversion, Navy ................................ 14,077,804 656,229 14,734,033 

Other Procurement, Navy ............................................. 6,310,257 –43,005 6,267,252 

Procurement, Marine Corps ......................................... 1,343,511 –18,008 1,325,503 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ................................... 11,398,901 –74,920 11,323,981 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
776 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Missile Procurement, Air Force .................................... 5,343,286 5,343,286 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ....................... 759,442 759,442 

Other Procurement, Air Force ...................................... 16,760,581 –13,738 16,746,843 

Procurement, Defense-Wide ......................................... 4,534,083 1,221 4,535,304 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ......................... 98,800 –98,800 0 

Subtotal, Title I—Procurement ................................. 98,227,168 215,081 98,442,249 

Title II—Research, Development, Test and Evaluation 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army ...... 7,989,102 –34,970 7,954,132 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy ...... 15,974,780 –312,959 15,661,821 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force 25,702,946 16,000 25,718,946 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, DefenseWide ......................................................................... 17,667,108 551,156 18,218,264 

Operational Test & Evaluation, Defense ..................... 186,300 186,300 

Subtotal, Title II—Research, Development, Test 

and Evaluation ........................................................ 67,520,236 219,227 67,739,463 

Title III—Operation and Maintenance 

Operation & Maintenance, Army ................................. 35,073,077 624,700 35,697,777 

Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve .................... 3,095,036 112,200 3,207,236 

Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard ........ 7,054,196 45,903 7,100,099 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy .................................. 39,945,237 457,368 40,402,605 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps .................... 6,254,650 131,000 6,385,650 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve .................... 1,197,752 15,800 1,213,552 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve ...... 263,317 300 263,617 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ........................... 37,270,842 269,425 37,540,267 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve ............. 3,164,607 4,570 3,169,177 

Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard ........... 6,566,004 28,200 6,594,204 

Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide .................... 32,997,693 –237,281 32,760,412 

US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, Defense .. 13,606 13,606 

Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid ........ 109,500 109,500 

Cooperative Threat Reduction ..................................... 528,455 528,455 

Defense Acquisition Development Workforce Fund ..... 256,031 –124,700 131,331 

Environmental Restoration, Army ................................ 298,815 298,815 

Environmental Restoration, Navy ................................ 316,103 316,103 

Environmental Restoration, Air Force .......................... 439,820 439,820 

Environmental Restoration, Defense ........................... 10,757 10,757 

Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Sites ........ 237,443 237,443 

Overseas Contingency Operations Transfer Fund ....... 5,000 –5,000 0 

Subtotal, Title III—Operation and Maintenance ...... 175,097,941 1,322,485 176,420,426 

Title IV—Military Personnel 

Military Personnel Appropriations ................................ 130,399,881 –682,900 129,716,981 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions 6,676,750 6,676,750 

Subtotal, Title IV—Military Personnel ...................... 137,076,631 –682,900 136,393,731 

Title XIV—Other Authorizations 

Working Capital Fund, Army ........................................ 25,158 25,158 

Working Capital Fund, Air Force ................................. 61,731 61,731 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
777 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide .......................... 46,428 46,428 

Working Capital Fund, DECA ....................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 

National Defense Sealift Fund .................................... 730,700 –112,200 618,500 

Defense Health Program .............................................. 33,054,528 –124,000 32,930,528 

Chemical Agents & Munitions Destruction ................. 1,057,123 1,057,123 

Drug Interdiction and Counter Drug Activities ........... 938,545 938,545 

Office of the Inspector General ................................... 312,131 34,869 347,000 

Subtotal, Title XIV—Other Authorizations ................ 37,638,854 –201,331 37,437,523 

Total, Division A: Department of Defense Authorizations ........................................................................ 515,560,830 872,562 516,433,392 

Division B: Military Construction Authorizations 

Military Construction 

Army ............................................................................. 1,119,875 –10,000 1,109,875 

Navy ............................................................................. 1,700,269 1,700,269 

Air Force ....................................................................... 1,156,573 –17,730 1,138,843 

Defense-Wide ............................................................... 3,985,300 –572,050 3,413,250 

Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense ....... 122,536 122,536 

NATO Security Investment Program ............................. 239,700 –40,000 199,700 

Army National Guard ................................................... 320,815 –5,000 315,815 

Army Reserve ............................................................... 174,060 174,060 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve ................................. 32,976 32,976 

Air National Guard ....................................................... 119,800 119,800 

Air Force Reserve ......................................................... 45,659 45,659 

Subtotal, Military Construction .................................. 9,017,563 –644,780 8,372,783 

Family Housing 

Construction, Army ...................................................... 44,008 44,008 

Operation & Maintenance, Army ................................. 512,871 512,871 

Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ........................ 73,407 73,407 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps ... 389,844 389,844 

Construction, Air Force ................................................ 76,360 76,360 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ........................... 388,598 388,598 

Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide .................... 55,845 55,845 

Family Housing Improvement Fund ............................. 1,780 1,780 

Subtotal, Family Housing ........................................... 1,542,713 1,542,713 

Base Realignment and Closure 

Base Realignment and Closure—Army ...................... 180,401 180,401 

Base Realignment and Closure—Navy ....................... 144,580 144,580 

Base Realignment and Closure—Air Force ................ 126,376 126,376 

Subtotal, Base Realignment and Closure ................. 451,357 451,357 

Total, Division B: Military Construction Authorizations ........................................................................ 11,011,633 –644,780 10,366,853 

Total, 051, Department of Defense-Military ............. 526,572,463 227,782 526,800,245 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
778 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Function 053, Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

Division C: Department of Energy National Security Authorization and Other Authorizations 

Department of Energy Authorizations 

Energy Programs 

Electricity delivery and energy reliability .................... 16,000 –16,000 0 

Nuclear Energy ............................................................. 94,000 94,000 

Subtotal, Energy Programs ........................................ 110,000 –16,000 94,000 

National Nuclear Security Administration 

Weapons Activities ....................................................... 7,868,409 40,843 7,909,252 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ................................ 2,140,142 40,000 2,180,142 

Naval Reactors ............................................................ 1,246,134 1,246,134 

Office of the Administrator ......................................... 397,784 –8,000 389,784 

Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Administration 11,652,469 72,843 11,725,312 

Environmental and Other Defense Activities: 

Defense Environmental Cleanup ................................. 5,316,909 –301,500 5,015,409 

Other Defense Activities .............................................. 749,080 9,578 758,658 

Subtotal, Environmental and Other Defense Activities .......................................................................... 6,065,989 -291,922 5,774,067 

Subtotal, Department of Energy Authorizations ....... 17,828,458 –235,079 17,593,379 

Independent Federal Agency Authorization 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board ..................... 29,915 29,915 

Subtotal, Independent Federal Agency Authorization .......................................................................... 29,915 29,915 

Subtotal, Division C: Department of Energy National Security Authorization and Other Authorizations ................................................................... 17,858,373 –235,079 17,623,294 

Subtotal, 053, Atomic Energy Defense Activities ..... 17,858,373 –235,079 17,623,294 

Total, National Defense Funding, Base Budget Request ....................................................................... 544,430,836 –7,297 544,423,539 

National Defense Funding, OCO Budget Request 

Function 051, Department of Defense-Military 

Procurement 

Aircraft Procurement, Army ......................................... 771,788 771,788 

Missile Procurement, Army .......................................... 128,645 128,645 

Procurement of Ammunition, Army .............................. 180,900 180,900 

Other Procurement, Army ............................................. 603,123 603,123 

Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund .......... 1,000,000 –45,000 955,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
779 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Aircraft Procurement, Navy .......................................... 240,696 240,696 

Weapons Procurement, Navy ....................................... 86,500 86,500 

Procurement of Ammunition, Navy & Marine Corps ... 206,821 206,821 

Other Procurement, Navy ............................................. 17,968 17,968 

Procurement, Marine Corps ......................................... 129,584 –2,898 126,686 

Aircraft Procurement, Air Force ................................... 115,668 115,668 

Missile Procurement, Air Force .................................... 24,200 24,200 

Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force ....................... 159,965 159,965 

Other Procurement, Air Force ...................................... 2,574,846 2,574,846 

Procurement, Defense-Wide ......................................... 111,275 111,275 

Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund ......................... 15,000 –15,000 0 

National Guard & Reserve Equipment ........................ 0 400,000 400,000 

Subtotal, Procurement ............................................... 6,366,979 337,102 6,704,081 

Research, Development, Test and Evaluation 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Army ...... 7,000 7,000 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy ...... 34,426 34,426 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force 9,000 9,000 

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, DefenseWide ......................................................................... 66,208 66,208 

Subtotal, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation .......................................................................... 116,634 116,634 

Operation and Maintenance 

Operation & Maintenance, Army ................................. 29,279,633 1,100,000 30,379,633 

Operation & Maintenance, Army Reserve .................... 42,935 42,935 

Operation & Maintenance, Army National Guard ........ 199,371 199,371 

Afghanistan Security Forces Fund ............................... 7,726,720 –1,500,000 6,226,720 

Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund ................................. 279,000 –29,000 250,000 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy .................................. 6,067,993 6,067,993 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps .................... 2,669,815 2,669,815 

Operation & Maintenance, Navy Reserve .................... 55,700 55,700 

Operation & Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve ...... 12,534 12,534 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ........................... 10,005,224 130,000 10,135,224 

Operation & Maintenance, Air Force Reserve ............. 32,849 32,849 

Operation & Maintenance, Air National Guard ........... 22,200 22,200 

Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide .................... 6,435,078 6,435,078 

Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance ....................... 62,829,052 –299,000 62,530,052 

Military Personnel 

Military Personnel Appropriations ................................ 9,689,307 –40,500 9,648,807 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions 164,033 164,033 

Subtotal, Military Personnel ...................................... 9,853,340 –40,500 9,812,840 

Other Authorizations 

Working Capital Fund, Army ........................................ 44,732 44,732 

Working Capital Fund, Air Force ................................. 88,500 88,500 

Working Capital Fund, Defense-Wide .......................... 131,678 131,678 

Defense Health Program .............................................. 904,201 904,201 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
780 

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Drug Interdiction and Counter Drug Activities ........... 376,305 376,305 

Office of the Inspector General ................................... 10,766 10,766 

Subtotal, Other Authorizations ................................... 1,556,182 1,556,182 

Total, National Defense Funding, OCO Budget Request ....................................................................... 80,722,187 –2,398 80,719,789 

Total, National Defense .............................................. 625,153,023 –9,695 625,143,328 

MEMORANDUM: NON-DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS 

Title XIV—Armed Forces Retirement Home (Function 

600) ......................................................................... 67,800 67,800 

Title XIV—Cemeterial Expenses, Army (Function 700) 45,800 25,000 70,800 

Title XXXIV—Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves (Function 270) ............................................. 20,000 20,000 

Title XXXV—Maritime Administration (Function 400) 152,168 45,000 197,168 

MEMORANDUM: TRANSFER AUTHORITIES (NON-ADD) 

Title X—General Transfer Authority ............................ [4,000,000 ] [1,000,000 ] [5,000,000 ] 

Title XV—Special Transfer Authority .......................... [4,000,000 ] [4,000,000 ] 

MEMORANDUM: DEFENSE AUTHORIZATIONS NOT UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE (NON-ADD) 

Defense Production Act ............................................... [25,135 ] [25,135 ] 

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET AUTHORITY IMPLICATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Summary, Discretionary Authorizations Within the Jurisdiction of the Armed Services Committee 

SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (051) ........................... 526,572,463 227,782 526,800,245 

SUBTOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE PROGRAMS (053) ........ 17,858,373 –235,079 17,623,294 

TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE (050)—BASE BILL ........................ 544,430,836 –7,297 544,423,539 

TOTAL, OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS ........................ 80,722,187 –2,398 80,719,789 

GRAND TOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE ........................................... 625,153,023 –9,695 625,143,328 

Base National Defense Discretionary Programs that are 

Not In the Jurisdiction of the Armed Services Committee or Do Not Require Additional Authorization 

Defense Production Act Purchases ............................................ 25,135 25,135 

Indefinite Account: Disposal Of DOD Real Property .................. 10,000 10,000 

Indefinite Account: Lease Of DOD Real Property ...................... 30,000 30,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 051 ........................................ 65,135 65,135 

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program ..................... 104,000 104,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 053 ........................................ 104,000 104,000 

Other Discretionary Programs .................................................... 7,407,000 7,407,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
781 

NATIONAL DEFENSE BUDGET AUTHORITY IMPLICATION—Continued 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

FY 2014 

Request 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 054 ........................................ 7,407,000 7,407,000 

Total Defense Discretionary Adjustments (050) ..................... 7,576,135 7,576,135 

Budget Authority Implication, National Defense Discretionary 

Department of Defense--Military (051) ..................................... 607,359,785 225,384 607,585,169 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities (053) .................................... 17,962,373 –235,079 17,727,294 

Defense-Related Activities (054) ............................................... 7,407,000 7,407,000 

Total BA Implication, National Defense Discretionary ........... 632,729,158 –9,695 632,719,463 

National Defense Mandatory Programs, Current Law 

Concurrent receipt accrual payments to the Military Retirement Fund (OMB Estimate) .................................................. 6,970,000 6,970,000 

Revolving, trust and other DOD Mandatory .............................. 1,156,000 1,156,000 

Offsetting receipts ..................................................................... –1,752,000 –1,752,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 051 ........................................ 6,374,000 6,374,000 

Energy employees occupational illness compensation programs and other ................................................................... 1,281,000 1,281,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 053 ........................................ 1,281,000 1,281,000 

Radiation exposure compensation trust fund ........................... 76,000 76,000 

Payment to CIA retirement fund and other .............................. 514,000 514,000 

Subtotal, Budget Sub-Function 054 ........................................ 590,000 590,000 

Total National Defense Mandatory (050) ................................ 8,245,000 8,245,000 

Budget Authority Implication, National Defense Discretionary and Mandatory 

Department of Defense--Military (051) ..................................... 613,733,785 225,384 613,959,169 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities (053) .................................... 19,243,373 –235,079 19,008,294 

Defense-Related Activities (054) ............................................... 7,997,000 7,997,000 

Total BA Implication, National Defense Discretionary and 

Mandatory ............................................................................. 640,974,158 –9,695 640,964,463 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
782 

TITLE XLI—PROCUREMENT 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT. 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 

001 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT .......................................................................... 1 19,730 1 19,730 1 19,730 1 19,730 

003 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) ................................................ 4 142,050 4 142,050 4 142,050 –57,000 4 85,050 

Modification of 12 transferred Liberty A/C ................................. [114,700 ] Reduction of EMARSS LRIP aircraft ............................................ [–114,700 ] [–57,000 ] 

004 MQ–1 UAV ............................................................................................ 15 518,460 19 518,460 15 518,460 15 518,460 

005 RQ–11 (RAVEN) .................................................................................... 10,772 10,772 10,772 10,772 

ROTARY 

006 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) ....................................................... 10 96,227 31 231,327 10 96,227 10 75,000 20 171,227 

Program increase for additional aircraft .................................... [21 ] [115,100 ] [10 ] [75,000 ] Program increase for fielding ..................................................... [20,000 ] 

007 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN ...................................................... 42 608,469 42 608,469 42 608,469 42 608,469 

008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 150,931 150,931 150,931 150,931 012 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) .................................................. 65 1,046,976 65 1,046,976 65 1,026,992 –14,061 65 1,032,915 

Transfer to PE 0203774A at Army request ................................. [–19,984 ] [–14,061 ] 

013 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 116,001 116,001 116,001 116,001 014 CH–47 HELICOPTER .............................................................................. 28 801,650 28 801,650 28 801,650 28 801,650 

015 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 98,376 98,376 98,376 98,376 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

016 MQ–1 PAYLOAD—UAS .......................................................................... 97,781 97,781 97,781 97,781 017 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) ....................................................................... 10,262 10,262 10,262 10,262 018 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) ....................................................... 12,467 12,467 12,467 12,467 019 AH–64 MODS ........................................................................................ 53,559 53,559 53,559 53,559 

020 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) ............................................ 149,764 149,764 149,764 149,764 021 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS .......................................................... 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
783 

022 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS .................................................................. 167 74,095 167 74,095 167 74,095 167 74,095 023 KIOWA MODS WARRIOR ........................................................................ 3 184,044 3 184,044 3 184,044 3 184,044 024 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN .............................................................. 152,569 152,569 152,569 152,569 025 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE ................................................................ 92,779 92,779 92,779 92,779 026 GATM ROLLUP ....................................................................................... 65,613 65,613 65,613 65,613 027 RQ–7 UAV MODS .................................................................................. 121,902 121,902 121,902 121,902 

GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS 

028 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT .................................................. 47,610 47,610 47,610 47,610 029 SURVIVABILITY CM ................................................................................ 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 030 CMWS .................................................................................................... 126,869 126,869 126,869 126,869 

OTHER SUPPORT 

031 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 705 6,809 705 6,809 705 6,809 705 6,809 

032 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 65,397 65,397 65,397 65,397 033 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS .......................................................... 45,841 45,841 45,841 45,841 034 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL .......................................................................... 79,692 79,692 79,692 79,692 035 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ......................................................................... 1,615 1,615 1,615 1,615 036 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET ..................................................................... 2,877 2,877 2,877 2,877 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................ 1,040 5,024,387 1,065 5,159,487 1,040 5,004,403 10 3,939 1,050 5,028,326 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM 

002 MSE MISSILE ......................................................................................... 56 540,401 56 540,401 56 540,401 56 540,401 

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ...................................................................... 4,464 4,464 4,464 4,464 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

004 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY ................................................. 449 110,510 449 110,510 449 110,510 449 110,510 

005 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY .................................................................... 988 49,354 988 49,354 988 49,354 988 49,354 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 19,965 19,965 19,965 19,965 007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) .......................................................... 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216 1,788 237,216 008 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) .......................... 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 2,412 19,022 

MODIFICATIONS 

011 PATRIOT MODS ...................................................................................... 256,438 256,438 256,438 256,438 012 STINGER MODS ..................................................................................... 37,252 37,252 37,252 37,252 013 ITAS/TOW MODS .................................................................................... 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 014 MLRS MODS .......................................................................................... 11,571 11,571 11,571 11,571 015 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS ....................................................................... 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

016 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 11,222 11,222 11,222 11,222 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

017 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS ......................................................................... 3,530 3,530 3,530 3,530 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
784 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

018 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) ................................................... 1,748 1,748 1,748 1,748 019 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT ............................................................... 5,285 5,285 5,285 5,285 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................... 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083 5,693 1,334,083 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 STRYKER VEHICLE ................................................................................ 374,100 374,100 374,100 374,100 

MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

002 STRYKER (MOD) .................................................................................... 20,522 20,522 20,522 20,522 

003 FIST VEHICLE (MOD) ............................................................................. 29,965 29,965 29,965 29,965 004 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) .................................................................. 158,000 158,000 158,000 158,000 005 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) ................................... 4,769 4,769 4,769 4,769 006 PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) .......................................... 18 260,177 18 260,177 18 219,477 –40,700 18 219,477 

Transfer to PE 0604854A at Army Request ................................ [–40,700 ] [–40,700 ] 

007 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) ........................... 111,031 186,031 111,031 75,000 186,031 

Program increase ........................................................................ [75,000 ] [75,000 ] 

008 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) ....................................................................... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 009 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE .............................................................. 14 62,951 21 93,951 14 62,951 14 62,951 

Program increase ........................................................................ [7 ] [31,000 ] 

010 M88 FOV MODS .................................................................................... 28,469 28,469 28,469 28,469

011 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE ........................................................................ 2,002 2,002 2,002 2,002 012 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) ..................................................................... 178,100 178,100 178,100 178,100 013 ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM .............................................................. 168,000 90,000 90,000 

Program increase ........................................................................ [168,000 ] [90,000 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

014 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) ........................................... 1,544 1,544 1,544 1,544 

WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES 

015 INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY .............................. 1,424 69,147 8,147 –1424 –69,147 0 

Transfer to PE 0604601A per Army’s request ............................ [–11,000 ] [–11,000 ] XM25 Counter Defilade Target Engagement ............................... [–1,424 ] [–50,000 ] [–1,424 ] [–69,147 ] [–1,424 ] [–58,147 ] 

018 MORTAR SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 5,310 5,310 5,310 5,310 019 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) ...................................... 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 5,061 24,049 021 CARBINE ............................................................................................... 41,897 70,846 41,897 48,846 12,000 21,254 –29897 –49,592 12,000 21,254 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
785 

Individual Carbine program cancelation .................................... [–22,000 ] [–29,897 ] [–49,592 ] [–29,897 ] [–49,592 ] 

023 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION ........................... 242 56,580 242 56,580 242 56,580 242 56,580 024 HANDGUN .............................................................................................. 300 300 300 300 

MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

026 M777 MODS .......................................................................................... 39,300 39,300 39,300 39,300 027 M4 CARBINE MODS .............................................................................. 10,300 10,300 10,300 10,300 028 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS ......................................................... 33,691 33,691 33,691 33,691 029 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS ......................................................... 7,608 7,608 7,608 7,608 030 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS ................................................... 2,719 2,719 2,719 2,719 031 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS ............................................................ 7,017 7,017 7,017 7,017 032 M119 MODIFICATIONS ........................................................................... 18,707 18,707 18,707 18,707 033 M16 RIFLE MODS .................................................................................. 2,136 2,136 2,136 2,136 034 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) ............................... 1,569 1,569 1,569 1,569 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

035 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) .............................................. 2,024 2,024 2,024 2,024 036 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) ........................................ 10,108 10,108 10,108 10,108 037 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ................................................................ 459 459 459 459 038 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) ................................. 1,267 1,267 1,267 1,267 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .............................. 48,656 1,597,267 47,239 1,788,267 17,335 1,437,828 –31,321 5,561 17,335 1,602,828 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 112,167 87,167 87,167 –25,000 87,167 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ..................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

003 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 58,571 53,571 53,571 –5,000 53,571 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ..................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 9,858 9,858 9,858 9,858 005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 80,037 55,037 55,037 –25,000 55,037 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ..................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] 

007 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 16,496 16,496 6,196 –10,300 6,196 

Program decrease ........................................................................ [–10,300 ] [–10,300 ] 

008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 69,533 50,033 50,033 –19,500 50,033 

Unit cost efficiencies—Army requested reduction ..................... [–19,500 ] [–19,500 ] [–19,500 ] 

009 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 55,781 55,781 55,781 55,781 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 38,029 38,029 38,029 38,029 011 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 24,656 24,656 24,656 24,656 012 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES ................................................................ 60,781 60,781 60,781 60,781 

TANK AMMUNITION 

013 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES ......................... 121,551 121,551 121,551 121,551 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
786 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES ....................... 39,825 39,825 39,825 39,825 015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ....................................... 37,902 37,902 37,902 37,902 016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 ................................................ 802 67,896 802 67,896 802 67,896 802 67,896 017 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL ......................... 71,205 71,205 71,205 71,205 

ROCKETS 

020 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................... 1,012 1,012 1,012 1,012 021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES ........................................................... 108,476 108,476 108,476 108,476 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 24,074 24,074 24,074 24,074 023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 33,242 33,242 33,242 33,242 024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 7,609 7,609 7,609 7,609 025 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES ...................................................................... 5,228 5,228 5,228 5,228 

MISCELLANEOUS 

026 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES ......................................................... 16,700 16,700 16,700 16,700 027 NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES ................................................. 7,366 7,366 7,366 7,366 028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 3,614 3,614 3,614 3,614 029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) ............................................... 12,423 12,423 12,423 12,423 030 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT .................................................... 16,604 16,604 16,604 16,604 031 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) .................................... 14,328 14,328 14,328 14,328 032 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES .......................................................................... 108 108 108 108 

PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT 

033 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ................................................. 242,324 242,324 242,324 242,324 034 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION .................................... 179,605 179,605 179,605 179,605 035 ARMS INITIATIVE ................................................................................... 3,436 3,436 3,436 3,436 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY ..................... 802 1,540,437 802 1,465,937 802 1,455,637 –84,800 802 1,455,637 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 

001 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS .......................................................... 25 4,000 25 4,000 25 4,000 25 4,000 002 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: ..................................................................... 40 6,841 40 6,841 40 6,841 40 6,841 003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) .......................................... 837 223,910 837 223,910 837 223,910 837 223,910 004 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP ............................... 11,880 11,880 11,880 11,880 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
787 

005 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) .................................... 220 14,731 220 14,731 220 14,731 220 14,731 006 PLS ESP ................................................................................................ 74 44,252 74 44,252 74 44,252 74 44,252 009 HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV .......................... 77 39,525 77 39,525 77 39,525 77 39,525 011 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS .................................. 746 51,258 746 25,958 746 51,258 –25,300 746 25,958 

Funding ahead of need ............................................................... [–25,300 ] [–25,300 ] 

012 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP .......................................................... 34 49,904 34 49,904 34 49,904 34 49,904 

013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ........................ 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 

NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES 

014 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN ...................................................................... 400 400 400 400 015 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 716 716 716 716 016 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER .......................................................... 5,619 5,619 5,619 5,619 

COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS 

018 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK ................................... 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 2,139 973,477 019 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 14,120 14,120 14,120 14,120 020 JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY .......................... 7,869 7,869 7,869 7,869 021 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) ............................................................ 5,296 5,296 5,296 5,296 

COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 

022 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS ......................... 31 147,212 31 147,212 31 147,212 31 147,212 023 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS .................. 7,998 7,998 7,998 7,998 024 SHF TERM ............................................................................................. 7,232 7,232 7,232 7,232 025 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) ................................ 3,308 3,308 3,308 3,308 026 SMART-T (SPACE) ................................................................................. 13,992 13,992 13,992 13,992028 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS ................................................................ 94 28,206 94 28,206 94 28,206 94 28,206 029 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) ........................................................ 15 2,778 15 2,778 15 2,778 15 2,778 

COMM—C3 SYSTEM 

031 ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) ................................... 17,590 17,590 17,590 17,590 

COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS 

032 ARMY DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (DATA RADIO) .............................. 786 786 786 786 033 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM ........................................................... 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 10,523 382,930 034 MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) ............................. 130 19,200 130 19,200 130 19,200 130 19,200 035 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) ..................................................... 1,438 1,438 1,438 1,438 036 SINCGARS FAMILY ................................................................................. 9,856 9,856 9,856 9,856 037 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2 ............................................................... 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 2,066 14,184 038 TRACTOR DESK ..................................................................................... 6,271 6,271 6,271 6,271 040 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS ................... 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 041 TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM ..................... 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 15,967 31,868 042 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE .................................................................... 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 044 RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY .................................................. 1,166 1,166 1,166 1,166 045 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE ....................... 22,867 22,867 22,867 22,867 

COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
788 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

048 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE ........................................................... 1,512 1,512 1,512 1,512 049 ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 323 61,096 323 61,096 323 61,096 323 61,096 

INFORMATION SECURITY 

050 TSEC—ARMY KEY MGT SYS (AKMS) .................................................... 13,890 13,890 13,890 13,890 051 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP ............................... 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 1,133 23,245 052 BIOMETRICS ENTERPRISE ..................................................................... 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 053 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) .............................................. 877 24,711 877 24,711 877 24,711 877 24,711 

COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS 

055 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS ....................................................... 43,395 43,395 43,395 43,395 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

057 INFORMATION SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 104,577 104,577 104,577 104,577 058 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) ...................................................... 612 612 612 612 059 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..................... 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 060 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM ....................... 248,477 248,477 248,477 248,477 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

064 JTT/CIBS-M ............................................................................................ 824 824 824 824 065 PROPHET GROUND ................................................................................ 10 59,198 10 59,198 10 59,198 10 59,198 

067 DCGS-A (MIP) ....................................................................................... 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 2,717 267,214 068 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) .......................................... 5 9,899 5 9,899 5 9,899 5 9,899 069 TROJAN (MIP) ........................................................................................ 24,598 24,598 24,598 24,598 070 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) ........................................... 1,927 1,927 1,927 1,927 071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) ................................ 6,169 6,169 6,169 6,169 072 MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M .................... 2,924 2,924 2,924 2,924 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................................. 18 40,735 18 40,735 18 40,735 18 40,735 075 EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) ................................. 13 13 13 13 076 ENEMY UAS ........................................................................................... 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES ...................... 1,237 1,237 1,237 1,237 080 CI MODERNIZATION ............................................................................... 1,399 1,399 1,399 1,399 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

082 SENTINEL MODS .................................................................................... 86 47,983 86 47,983 86 47,983 86 47,983 083 SENSE THROUGH THE WALL (STTW) ..................................................... 142 142 142 142 084 NIGHT VISION DEVICES ......................................................................... 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428 6,879 202,428 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
789 

085 LONG RANGE ADVANCED SCOUT SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ................... 5,183 5,183 5,183 5,183 086 NIGHT VISION, THERMAL WPN SIGHT ................................................... 14,074 14,074 14,074 14,074 087 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF ............................... 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300 1,491 22,300089 GREEN LASER INTERDICTION SYSTEM (GLIS) ....................................... 1,016 1,016 1,016 1,016 090 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS ............................... 5 55,354 5 55,354 5 55,354 5 55,354 091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP ............................................................... 800 800 800 800 092 PROFILER .............................................................................................. 3,027 3,027 3,027 3,027 093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) .................................... 1,185 1,185 1,185 1,185 094 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) .................................... 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 3,866 103,214 096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) ............................................................. 167 26,037 167 26,037 167 26,037 167 26,037 097 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM ......................................................... 120 23,100 120 23,100 120 23,100 120 23,100 098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ......................................................................... 19 312,727 19 312,727 19 312,727 19 312,727 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

101 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY .................................................................... 574 43,228 574 43,228 574 43,228 574 43,228 

102 BATTLE COMMAND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM .......................... 167 14,446 167 14,446 167 14,446 167 14,446 103 FAAD C2 ................................................................................................ 4,607 4,607 4,607 4,607 104 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS ............................... 8 33,090 8 33,090 8 33,090 8 33,090 105 IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM ........................................................ 21,200 21,200 21,200 21,200 107 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) ............................................. 1,795 1,795 1,795 1,795 109 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE ....................... 54,327 54,327 54,327 54,327 110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ................................................... 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 2,959 59,171 111 GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) .......................... 83,936 83,936 83,936 83,936 113 LOGISTICS AUTOMATION ....................................................................... 25,476 25,476 25,476 25,476 114 RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET ........................ 212 19,341 212 19,341 212 19,341 212 19,341 

ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION 

115 ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION ......................................................... 11,865 11,865 11,865 11,865 116 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP ................................................ 219,431 219,431 219,431 219,431 117 GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM ....................... 6,414 6,414 6,414 6,414 118 HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) ....................................... 62,683 62,683 62,683 62,683 120 RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) ................................ 34,951 34,951 34,951 34,951 

ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) 

121 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (A/V) ............................................................ 7,440 7,440 7,440 7,440 122 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) ............................... 16 1,615 16 1,615 16 1,615 16 1,615 

ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT 

123 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) ..................................................... 554 554 554 554 124 BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ........................................................... 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

124A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 3,558 3,558 3,558 3,558 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ........................................ 762 762 762 762 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
790 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ........................................................... 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 3,759 20,630 128 CBRN DEFENSE ..................................................................................... 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 24,530 22,151 

BRIDGING EQUIPMENT 

130 TACTICAL BRIDGING .............................................................................. 2 14,188 2 14,188 2 14,188 2 14,188 

131 TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON ....................................................... 34 23,101 34 23,101 34 23,101 34 23,101132 COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP ................................... 15,416 15,416 15,416 15,416 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

134 GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) ........................... 311 50,465 311 50,465 311 50,465 311 50,465 135 ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) ...................................... 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 136 EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION ....................................... 1,563 1,563 1,563 1,563 137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ...................... 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 6,774 20,921 138 REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS ............................................................ 100 100 100 100 139 < $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT ..................................................... 70 2,271 70 2,271 70 2,271 70 2,271 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 HEATERS AND ECU’S ............................................................................ 464 7,269 464 7,269 464 7,269 464 7,269 141 LAUNDRIES, SHOWERS AND LATRINES ................................................. 200 200 200 200 142 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT ....................................................................... 1,468 1,468 1,468 1,468 143 PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) .............................. 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 31,530 26,526 144 GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM ................................................................... 5,547 81,680 5,547 71,680 5,547 81,680 –10,000 5,547 71,680 

Unjustified unit cost growth ....................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 217 28,096 217 28,096 217 28,096 217 28,096 

148 CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM .................... 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 6,904 56,150 149 MORTUARY AFFAIRS SYSTEMS .............................................................. 248 3,242 248 3,242 248 3,242 248 3,242 150 FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS ........................ 289 38,141 289 38,141 289 38,141 289 38,141 151 ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) ....................................................... 210 5,859 210 5,859 210 5,859 210 5,859

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER .................................. 508 60,612 508 60,612 508 60,612 508 60,612 

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT 

153 COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL ................................................................. 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 3,258 22,042 

154 MEDEVAC MISSON EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (MEP) .................................. 88 35,318 88 35,318 88 35,318 88 35,318 

MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 

155 MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS ...................................... 25 19,427 25 19,427 25 19,427 25 19,427 156 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) .................................................. 347 3,860 347 3,860 347 3,860 347 3,860 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
791 

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 

157 GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) ............................................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 159 SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING ................................................................... 52 36,078 52 36,078 52 36,078 52 36,078 

160 MISSION MODULES—ENGINEERING ..................................................... 13 9,721 13 9,721 13 9,721 13 9,721 162 HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR ....................................................................... 109 50,122 109 50,122 109 50,122 109 50,122 163 TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED ..................................................................... 84 28,828 84 28,828 84 28,828 84 28,828 164 ALL TERRAIN CRANES ........................................................................... 19 19,863 19 19,863 19 19,863 19 19,863 166 HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) ................................... 34 23,465 34 23,465 34 23,465 34 23,465 168 ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP ............................ 109 13,590 109 13,590 109 13,590 109 13,590 169 CONST EQUIP ESP ................................................................................ 80 16,088 80 16,088 80 16,088 80 16,088 170 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) ............................................ 66 6,850 66 6,850 66 6,850 66 6,850 

RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT 

171 ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP ....................................................................... 38,007 19,007 38,007 –19,000 19,007 

Funding ahead of need ............................................................... [–19,000 ] [–19,000 ] 

172 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) ................................................ 10,605 10,605 10,605 10,605 

GENERATORS 

173 GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP ................................................ 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 5,239 129,437 

MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

174 ROUGH TERRAIN CONTAINER HANDLER (RTCH) ................................... 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 175 FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS ........................................................................... 60 8,260 60 8,260 60 8,260 60 8,260 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT ................................................ 309 121,710 309 121,710 309 121,710 309 121,710 

177 TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM .......................................................... 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200 8,181 225,200 178 CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER ..................................................... 15 30,063 15 30,063 15 30,063 15 30,063 179 AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER ................................... 2 34,913 2 34,913 2 34,913 2 34,913 180 GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING ..................... 9,955 9,955 9,955 9,955 

TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) 

181 CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 3 8,241 3 8,241 3 8,241 3 8,241 182 INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) ................................ 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 1,810 67,506 183 TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) ........................................ 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 2,105 18,755 

OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

184 M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR ............................................................... 647 5,110 647 5,110 647 5,110 647 5,110 

185 RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................... 5,110 5,110 5,110 5,110 186 PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) ................................................. 62,904 62,904 62,904 62,904 187 BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 1,427 1,427 1,427 1,427 188 MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) ................................... 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 1,936 96,661 189 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) ..................................................... 2,450 2,450 2,450 2,450 190 SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING ............................................ 69 11,593 69 11,593 69 11,593 69 11,593 191 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 .................................................................. 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 1,597 8,948 192 TRACTOR YARD ..................................................................................... 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
792 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

OPA2 

195 INITIAL SPARES—C&E .......................................................................... 15 59,700 15 59,700 15 59,700 15 59,700 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................................... 162,339 6,465,218 162,339 6,410,918 162,339 6,465,218 –54,300 162,339 6,410,918 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

001 EA–18G ................................................................................................. 21 2,001,787 21 1,956,787 21 2,001,787 –60,913 21 1,940,874 

Excess engineering change order funding .................................. [–8,790 ] GFE electronics cost growth ........................................................ [–5,943 ] Other GFE cost growth ................................................................ [–1,180 ] Program adjustment .................................................................... [–45,000 ] [–45,000 ] 

003 F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET .............................................................. 206,551 206,551 206,551 206,551 004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 75,000 75,000 75,000 

Program increase ........................................................................ [75,000 ] [75,000 ] 

005 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV .................................................................... 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444 4 1,135,444 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 94,766 94,766 94,766 94,766 007 JSF STOVL ............................................................................................. 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260 6 1,267,260 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 103,195 103,195 103,195 103,195 009 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) ............................................................................ 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 18 1,432,573 010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 55,196 55,196 55,196 55,196 011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) .......................................................... 25 749,962 25 749,962 25 749,962 25 749,962 

012 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 71,000 71,000 71,000 71,000 013 MH–60S (MYP) ..................................................................................... 18 383,831 18 383,831 18 383,831 18 383,831 014 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 37,278 37,278 37,278 37,278 015 MH–60R (MYP) ..................................................................................... 19 599,237 20 599,237 19 599,237 19 599,237 016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 231,834 231,834 231,834 231,834 017 P–8A POSEIDON .................................................................................... 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 16 3,189,989 018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 313,160 313,160 313,160 313,160 019 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE ............................................................................. 5 997,107 5 962,107 5 997,107 5 997,107 

Unjustified CRI Funding .............................................................. [–35,000 ] 

020 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 266,542 266,542 266,542 266,542 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 

021 JPATS .................................................................................................... 29 249,080 29 249,080 29 249,080 29 249,080 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
793 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

022 KC–130J ................................................................................................ 2 134,358 2 134,358 2 134,358 2 134,358 

023 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 32,288 32,288 32,288 32,288 025 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 52,002 52,002 52,002 –47,200 4,802 

Advance procurement appropriated in fiscal year 2013 ............ [–47,200 ] 

026 MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................................ 1 60,980 1 60,980 1 60,980 1 60,980 028 OTHER SUPPORT AIRCRAFT .................................................................. 1 14,958 1 14,958 1 14,958 1 14,958

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

029 EA–6 SERIES ........................................................................................ 18,577 18,577 18,577 18,577 

030 AEA SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 48,502 48,502 48,502 48,502 031 AV–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 41,575 41,575 41,575 41,575 032 ADVERSARY ........................................................................................... 2,992 2,992 2,992 2,992033 F–18 SERIES ......................................................................................... 875,371 875,371 875,371 –41,841 833,530 

ECP 6038 radome kits cost growth (OSIP 002–07) ................... [–2,952 ] 

Integrated logistics support growth (OSIP 14–03) ..................... [–8,000 ] Other support and ILS ahead of need (OSIP 04–14) ................. [–20,989 ] Retrofit radars (APG–79B) cost growth (OSIP 002–07) ............. [–9,900 ] 

034 H–46 SERIES ........................................................................................ 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 036 H–53 SERIES ........................................................................................ 67,675 67,675 67,675 67,675 037 SH–60 SERIES ...................................................................................... 135,054 135,054 135,054 135,054 038 H–1 SERIES .......................................................................................... 41,706 41,706 41,706 41,706 039 EP–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 55,903 12 77,903 77,903 22,000 77,903 

12th aircraft to Spiral 3 ............................................................. [8,000 ] [8,000 ] [8,000 ] Sensor obsolescence .................................................................... [12 ] [14,000 ] [14,000 ] [14,000 ] 

040 P–3 SERIES .......................................................................................... 37,436 37,436 37,436 37,436 

041 E–2 SERIES .......................................................................................... 31,044 31,044 31,044 31,044 042 TRAINER A/C SERIES ............................................................................ 43,720 43,720 43,720 –3,200 40,520 

Avionics Obsolescence installation cost growth ......................... [–3,200 ] 

043 C–2A ..................................................................................................... 902 902 902 902 044 C–130 SERIES ...................................................................................... 47,587 47,587 47,587 47,587 045 FEWSG ................................................................................................... 665 665 665 665 046 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES ........................................................... 14,587 14,587 14,587 14,587 047 E–6 SERIES .......................................................................................... 189,312 189,312 189,312 –6,094 183,218 

FAB-T funding previously appropriated (OSIP 014–14) ............. [–6,094 ] 

048 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES ........................................................ 85,537 85,537 85,537 85,537 049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ................................................................ 3,684 4 16,684 13,684 10,000 13,684

Program office sustainment ........................................................ [8,000 ] [5,000 ] [5,000 ] Sensor obsolescence .................................................................... [4 ] [5,000 ] [5,000 ] [5,000 ] 

050 T–45 SERIES ......................................................................................... 98,128 98,128 98,128 98,128 

051 POWER PLANT CHANGES ...................................................................... 22,999 22,999 22,999 22,999 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
794 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

052 JPATS SERIES ........................................................................................ 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576053 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS ............................................................ 6,267 6,267 6,267 6,267 054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 141,685 141,685 141,685 141,685 055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .............................................................. 120,660 120,660 120,660 120,660 056 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM ............................................... 3,554 3,554 3,554 3,554 057 ID SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 41,800 41,800 41,800 41,800 058 P–8 SERIES .......................................................................................... 9,485 9,485 9,485 9,485059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ..................................................................... 14,431 14,431 14,431 14,431 060 MQ–8 SERIES ....................................................................................... 1,001 1,001 1,001 1,001 061 RQ–7 SERIES ........................................................................................ 26,433 26,433 26,433 26,433 062 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY ........................................................ 160,834 160,834 160,834 160,834 063 F–35 STOVL SERIES ............................................................................. 147,130 147,130 147,130 147,130 064 F–35 CV SERIES ................................................................................... 31,100 31,100 31,100 31,100 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 1,142,461 1,142,461 1,142,461 1,142,461 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES 

066 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 410,044 410,044 410,044 410,044 067 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................ 27,450 27,450 27,450 27,450 068 WAR CONSUMABLES ............................................................................. 28,930 28,930 28,930 28,930 069 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................ 5,268 5,268 5,268 5,268 070 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 60,306 60,306 60,306 60,306 071 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 1,775 1,775 1,775 1,775 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 165 17,927,651 182 17,957,651 165 17,959,651 –52,248 165 17,875,403 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

001 TRIDENT II MODS .................................................................................. 1,140,865 1,126,765 1,140,865 1,140,865 

Equipment related to New START treaty implementation .......... [–14,100 ] 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

002 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................... 7,617 7,617 7,617 7,617 

STRATEGIC MISSILES 

003 TOMAHAWK ............................................................................................ 196 312,456 196 312,456 196 312,456 196 312,456 

TACTICAL MISSILES 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
795 

004 AMRAAM ................................................................................................ 54 95,413 54 95,413 54 95,413 54 95,413 005 SIDEWINDER .......................................................................................... 225 117,208 225 117,208 225 117,208 225 117,208 006 JSOW ..................................................................................................... 328 136,794 328 136,794 328 136,794 328 136,794 007 STANDARD MISSILE ............................................................................... 81 367,985 81 367,985 81 367,985 81 367,985 008 RAM ...................................................................................................... 66 67,596 66 67,596 66 67,596 –1,612 66 65,984 

Guidance and control assembly contract savings ..................... [–1,612 ] 

009 HELLFIRE ............................................................................................... 363 33,916 363 33,916 363 33,916 363 33,916 011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) .......................... 50 6,278 50 6,278 50 6,278 50 6,278 012 AERIAL TARGETS ................................................................................... 41,799 41,799 41,799 41,799 013 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT ..................................................................... 3,538 3,538 3,538 3,538 

MODIFICATION OF MISSILES 

014 ESSM ..................................................................................................... 53 76,749 53 76,749 53 76,749 53 76,749 015 HARM MODS ......................................................................................... 143 111,902 143 111,902 143 111,902 143 111,902 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES 

016 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ........................................................ 1,138 1,138 1,138 1,138 017 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON ................................................... 23,014 23,014 23,014 23,014 

ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

018 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 84,318 84,318 84,318 84,318 

TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

019 SSTD ..................................................................................................... 3,978 3,978 3,978 3,978 

020 ASW TARGETS ....................................................................................... 8,031 8,031 8,031 8,031 

MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP 

021 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS ....................................................................... 150 125,898 150 125,898 150 125,898 150 125,898 022 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS ........................................................... 108 53,203 108 53,203 108 53,203 108 53,203 023 QUICKSTRIKE MINE ............................................................................... 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 

SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

024 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 59,730 59,730 59,730 59,730 025 ASW RANGE SUPPORT .......................................................................... 4,222 4,222 4,222 4,222 

DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION 

026 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 3,963 3,963 3,963 3,963 

GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

027 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS ................................................................ 12,513 12,513 12,513 12,513 

MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS 

028 CIWS MODS ........................................................................................... 56,308 56,308 62,708 6,400 62,708 

Additional RMA kits ..................................................................... [6,400 ] [6,400 ] 

029 COAST GUARD WEAPONS ...................................................................... 10,727 10,727 10,727 –3,458 7,269 

Machine gun equipment cost growth ......................................... [–3,458 ] 

030 GUN MOUNT MODS ............................................................................... 72,901 72,901 72,901 –13,380 59,521 

MK38 gun kits cost growth ......................................................... [–13,380 ] 

031 CRUISER MODERNIZATION WEAPONS ................................................... 1,943 1 1,943 1,943 1,943 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
796 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

032 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS ........................................ 19,758 19,758 19,758 19,758 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

034 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 52,632 52,632 52,632 52,632 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 1,817 3,122,193 1,818 3,108,093 1,817 3,128,593 –12,050 1,817 3,110,143 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 37,703 37,703 37,703 37,703 002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 65,411 65,411 65,411 65,411 003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ................................................................. 20,284 20,284 20,284 20,284 004 PRACTICE BOMBS ................................................................................. 37,870 37,870 37,870 37,870 005 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES ........................................... 53,764 53,764 53,764 53,764 006 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES ................................................ 67,194 67,194 67,194 67,194 007 JATOS .................................................................................................... 2,749 2,749 2,749 2,749 008 LRLAP 6′′ LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE ....................................... 3,906 3,906 3,906 3,906 

009 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................... 24,151 24,151 24,151 24,151 010 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION ......................................... 33,080 33,080 33,080 33,080 011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................ 40,398 40,398 40,398 40,398 012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO ............................................... 61,219 61,219 61,219 61,219 013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .......................................................... 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637 014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION .................................................. 4,578 4,578 4,578 4,578 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ................................................................... 26,297 26,297 26,297 26,297 016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .............................................................. 6,088 6,088 6,088 6,088 017 40 MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 7,644 7,644 7,644 7,644 018 60MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 3,349 3,349 3,349 3,349 020 120MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 13,361 13,361 13,361 13,361 022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 2,149 2,149 2,149 2,149 023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 27,465 27,465 27,465 27,465 026 FUZE, ALL TYPES .................................................................................. 26,366 26,366 26,366 26,366 

028 AMMO MODERNIZATION ........................................................................ 8,403 8,403 8,403 8,403 029 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 5,201 5,201 5,201 5,201 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ...................... 589,267 589,267 589,267 589,267 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
797 

SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY OTHER WARSHIPS 

001 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................... 944,866 944,866 944,866 944,866 003 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE ................................................................ 2 2,930,704 2 3,422,704 2 2,930,704 492,000 2 3,422,704 

Increase to Virginia class ........................................................... [492,000 ] [492,000 ] 

004 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 2,354,612 2,354,612 2,354,612 2,354,612 005 CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS ................................................................ 1,705,424 1,705,424 1,705,424 –22,071 1,683,353 

CVN 72 requirement previously funded in Fiscal Year 2012 reprogramming. [–22,071 ] 

006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 245,793 245,793 245,793 245,793 007 DDG 1000 ............................................................................................. 231,694 310,994 231,694 231,694 

Increase to DDG 1000 ................................................................. [79,300 ] 

008 DDG–51 ................................................................................................ 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 1 1,615,564 

009 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 388,551 388,551 388,551 388,551 010 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP ....................................................................... 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 4 1,793,014 

AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS 

012 AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE ........................................................ 1 524,000 1 524,000 1 579,300 55,300 1 579,300 

Navy requested adjustment ........................................................ [55,300 ] [55,300 ] 

014 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL ................................................................... 2,732 2,732 2,732 2,732 

AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST 

016 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 183,900 183,900 183,900 23,400 207,300 

Program shortfall ........................................................................ [23,400 ] 

017 OUTFITTING ........................................................................................... 450,163 450,163 450,163 450,163 019 LCAC SLEP ............................................................................................ 4 80,987 4 80,987 4 80,987 4 80,987 020 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS ................................... 625,800 988,800 725,800 107,600 733,400 

DDG–51 ....................................................................................... [332,000 ] [100,000 ] Help buy 3rd DDG–51 in FY 13 .................................................. [100,000 ] Joint High Speed Vessel .............................................................. [7,600 ] [7,600 ] MTS .............................................................................................. [23,400 ] 

TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY ......................... 12 14,077,804 12 15,012,104 12 14,233,104 656,229 12 14,734,033 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT 

001 LM–2500 GAS TURBINE ........................................................................ 10,180 10,180 10,180 10,180 002 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE ................................................................ 5,536 5,536 5,536 5,536 003 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) ........................................................... 16,956 16,956 16,956 –13,000 3,956 

Contract delay ............................................................................. [–13,000 ] 

GENERATORS 

004 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E ............................................................... 19,782 19,782 19,782 19,782 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
798 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT 

005 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 39,509 39,509 39,509 39,509 

PERISCOPES 

006 SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP .................................................... 52,515 52,515 52,515 52,515 

OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT 

007 DDG MOD .............................................................................................. 285,994 285,994 285,994 285,994 

008 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 14,389 14,389 14,389 14,389 009 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD ............................................ 2,436 2,436 2,436 2,436 010 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE .................................................................................. 12,700 12,700 12,700 12,700 

011 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM .................................. 40,329 40,329 40,329 40,329 012 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 19,603 19,603 19,603 19,603 013 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 8,678 8,678 8,678 8,678 014 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................ 74,209 74,209 74,209 74,209 015 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 47,078 47,078 47,078 47,078 016 SUBMARINE BATTERIES ........................................................................ 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 017 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 25,053 25,053 25,053 25,053 018 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ............................................... 12,986 12,986 12,986 12,986 019 DSSP EQUIPMENT ................................................................................. 2,455 2,455 2,455 2,455 020 CG MODERNIZATION ............................................................................. 10,539 1 10,539 10,539 10,539 021 LCAC ..................................................................................................... 14,431 14,431 14,431 14,431 022 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS ............................................................ 36,700 36,700 36,700 36,700 023 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 119,902 119,902 119,902 119,902 024 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS ......................................................... 3,678 3,678 3,678 3,678 025 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................................................... 8,292 8,292 8,292 8,292 

REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT 

027 REACTOR COMPONENTS ....................................................................... 286,744 286,744 286,744 286,744 

OCEAN ENGINEERING 

028 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 8,780 8,780 8,780 8,780 

SMALL BOATS 

029 STANDARD BOATS ................................................................................. 36,452 36,452 36,452 –3,396 33,056 

CNIC force protection medium contract delay ............................ [–3,396 ] 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

030 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT .................................................... 36,145 36,145 36,145 36,145 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
799 

PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT 

031 OPERATING FORCES IPE ....................................................................... 69,368 69,368 69,368 –19,500 49,868 

Emergent repair facility outfitting ahead of need ..................... [–19,500 ] 

OTHER SHIP SUPPORT 

032 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS ........................................................................ 106,328 106,328 106,328 106,328 033 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT .................................... 45,966 45,966 45,966 45,966 034 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES ............................................................... 59,885 59,885 59,885 59,885 035 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES ............................................................... 37,168 37,168 37,168 37,168 

LOGISTIC SUPPORT 

036 LSD MIDLIFE ......................................................................................... 77,974 1 77,974 77,974 77,974 

SHIP SONARS 

038 SPQ–9B RADAR .................................................................................... 27,934 27,934 27,934 27,934

039 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM ............................................ 83,231 83,231 83,231 83,231 040 SSN ACOUSTICS .................................................................................... 199,438 199,438 199,438 199,438 041 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................ 9,394 9,394 9,394 9,394 042 SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS ................................................ 12,953 12,953 12,953 12,953 043 ELECTRONIC WARFARE MILDEC ............................................................ 8,958 8,958 8,958 8,958 

ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

044 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM ........................................... 24,077 24,077 24,077 24,077 045 SSTD ..................................................................................................... 11,925 11,925 11,925 –3,425 8,500 

AN/SLQ–25X cancellation ............................................................ [–3,425 ] 

046 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM ............................................................. 94,338 94,338 94,338 94,338 047 SURTASS ............................................................................................... 9,680 9,680 9,680 9,680 048 MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE .............................. 18,130 18,130 18,130 18,130 

ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT 

049 AN/SLQ–32 ............................................................................................ 203,375 1 203,375 203,375 –3,684 199,691 

Excess block 2 support funding ................................................. [–3,684 ] 

RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT 

050 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT ........................................................................ 123,656 1 123,656 123,656 123,656 

051 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) ......................................... 896 896 896 896 

SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT 

052 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG ............................................. 49,475 49,475 49,475 49,475 

OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

053 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY ............................................. 34,692 34,692 34,692 34,692 054 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) ................................................. 396 396 396 396 055 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) ..................... 15,703 15,703 15,703 15,703 056 ATDLS .................................................................................................... 3,836 3,836 3,836 3,836 057 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) ................................ 7,201 7,201 7,201 7,201 058 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT ............................................... 54,400 54,400 54,400 54,400 059 SHALLOW WATER MCM ......................................................................... 8,548 8,548 8,548 8,548 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
800 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

060 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) ...................................................... 11,765 11,765 11,765 11,765 061 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE ....................................... 6,483 6,483 6,483 6,483 062 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP ............................................... 7,631 7,631 7,631 7,631 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

063 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT ............................................................... 53,644 53,644 53,644 53,644 

AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

064 MATCALS ............................................................................................... 7,461 7,461 7,461 7,461 065 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ...................................................... 9,140 9,140 9,140 9,140 066 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM ............................................... 20,798 20,798 20,798 20,798 067 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM .............................................................. 19,754 19,754 19,754 19,754 068 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................... 8,909 8,909 8,909 8,909 069 LANDING SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 13,554 13,554 13,554 13,554 070 ID SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 38,934 38,934 38,934 38,934 071 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ................................................... 14,131 14,131 14,131 14,131 

OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT 

072 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL ......................................... 3,249 3,249 3,249 3,249 073 MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM ...................................... 11,646 11,646 11,646 11,646 074 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS ........................................................... 18,189 18,189 18,189 18,189 075 DCGS-N ................................................................................................. 17,350 17,350 17,350 17,350 076 CANES ................................................................................................... 340,567 1 340,567 340,567 340,567 077 RADIAC .................................................................................................. 9,835 9,835 9,835 9,835 078 CANES-INTELL ....................................................................................... 59,652 59,652 59,652 59,652 079 GPETE ................................................................................................... 6,253 6,253 6,253 6,253 080 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY ............................................... 4,963 4,963 4,963 4,963 081 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION ........................................................ 4,664 4,664 4,664 4,664 082 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 66,889 66,889 66,889 66,889 

SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS 

084 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION .................................................. 23,877 1 23,877 23,877 23,877 086 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M ................................................. 28,001 28,001 28,001 28,001 

SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS 

087 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT ...................................................... 7,856 7,856 7,856 7,856 088 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT .......................................... 74,376 74,376 74,376 74,376 

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
801 

089 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ............................................... 27,381 27,381 27,381 27,381 090 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) ..................................................... 215,952 1 215,952 215,952 215,952 

SHORE COMMUNICATIONS 

091 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 4,463 4,463 4,463 4,463 092 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS .............................................................. 778 778 778 778 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT 

094 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ......................................... 133,530 133,530 133,530 133,530 095 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM ............................................................ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 

CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT 

096 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP .............................................. 12,251 12,251 12,251 12,251 

OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT 

097 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 2,893 2,893 2,893 2,893 

SONOBUOYS 

099 SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 179,927 179,927 179,927 179,927 

AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

100 WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .............................................. 55,279 55,279 55,279 55,279 101 EXPEDITIONARY AIRFIELDS ................................................................... 8,792 8,792 8,792 8,792 102 AIRCRAFT REARMING EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 11,364 11,364 11,364 11,364 103 AIRCRAFT LAUNCH & RECOVERY EQUIPMENT ...................................... 59,502 59,502 59,502 59,502 104 METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 19,118 19,118 19,118 19,118 105 DCRS/DPL ............................................................................................. 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 106 AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT ....................................................................... 29,670 29,670 29,670 29,670 107 AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES .................................................. 101,554 101,554 101,554 101,554 108 LAMPS MK III SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT ................................................. 18,293 18,293 18,293 18,293 109 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE AIDS ....................................... 7,969 7,969 7,969 7,969 110 OTHER AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 5,215 5,215 5,215 5,215 111 AUTONOMIC LOGISTICS INFORMATION SYSTEM (ALIS) ......................... 4,827 4,827 4,827 4,827 

SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT 

112 NAVAL FIRES CONTROL SYSTEM ........................................................... 1,188 1,188 1,188 1,188 113 GUN FIRE CONTROL EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 4,447 4,447 4,447 4,447 

SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 

114 NATO SEASPARROW .............................................................................. 58,368 58,368 58,368 58,368 115 RAM GMLS ............................................................................................ 491 491 491 491 116 SHIP SELF DEFENSE SYSTEM ............................................................... 51,858 51,858 51,858 51,858 117 AEGIS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................................ 59,757 59,757 59,757 59,757 118 TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 71,559 71,559 71,559 71,559 119 VERTICAL LAUNCH SYSTEMS ................................................................ 626 626 626 626 120 MARITIME INTEGRATED PLANNING SYSTEM-MIPS ................................ 2,779 2,779 2,779 2,779 

FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

121 STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP ................................................... 224,484 198,565 224,484 224,484 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
802 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

New START treaty implementation .............................................. [–25,919 ] 

ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

122 SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................................ 85,678 85,678 85,678 85,678 123 SUBMARINE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 3,913 3,913 3,913 3,913 124 SURFACE ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 3,909 3,909 3,909 3,909 125 ASW RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 28,694 28,694 28,694 28,694 

OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

126 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP .............................................. 46,586 46,586 46,586 46,586 127 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 11,933 11,933 11,933 11,933 

OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE 

128 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM ..................................................... 62,361 1 62,361 62,361 62,361 129 SURFACE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ....................................................... 41,813 41,813 41,813 41,813 130 SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS ................................................... 26,672 26,672 26,672 26,672 

CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

131 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 132 GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS ................................................................. 3,717 3,717 3,717 3,717 133 CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP .............................................. 10,881 10,881 10,881 10,881 134 FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 14,748 14,748 14,748 14,748 135 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 5,540 5,540 5,540 5,540 136 AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT ...................................................................... 5,741 5,741 5,741 5,741 137 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 3,852 3,852 3,852 3,852 138 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION .................................................................... 25,757 25,757 25,757 25,757 139 PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES ............................................................ 1,182 1,182 1,182 1,182 

SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

140 MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT ....................................................... 14,250 14,250 14,250 14,250 141 OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .................................................. 6,401 6,401 6,401 6,401 142 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 5,718 5,718 5,718 5,718 143 SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS ................................................... 22,597 22,597 22,597 22,597 

TRAINING DEVICES 

144 TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 22,527 22,527 22,527 22,527 

COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

145 COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 50,428 50,428 50,428 50,428 146 EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 2,292 2,292 2,292 2,292 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
803 

147 MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................................ 4,925 4,925 4,925 4,925 149 NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 3,202 3,202 3,202 3,202 151 OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT .......................................... 24,294 24,294 24,294 24,294 152 C4ISR EQUIPMENT ................................................................................ 4,287 4,287 4,287 4,287 153 ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ............................................... 18,276 18,276 18,276 18,276 154 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 134,495 134,495 134,495 134,495 155 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 324,327 324,327 324,327 324,327 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

156A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 12,140 12,140 12,140 12,140 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

157 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 317,234 316,959 317,234 317,234 

New START treaty implementation .............................................. [–275 ] 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ...................................... 6,310,257 8 6,284,063 6,310,257 –43,005 6,267,252 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES 

001 AAV7A1 PIP ........................................................................................... 32,360 32,360 32,360 32,360 

002 LAV PIP ................................................................................................. 6,003 6,003 6,003 6,003 

ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS 

003 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM .............................................. 589 589 589 589 004 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER ............................................. 3,655 3,655 3,655 3,655 005 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM ....................................... 5,467 5,467 5,467 5,467 006 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION ...................... 20,354 20,354 20,354 20,354 

OTHER SUPPORT 

007 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 38,446 38,446 38,446 38,446

008 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM .................................................... 4,734 4,734 4,734 4,734 

GUIDED MISSILES 

009 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE ............................................................. 15,713 15,713 15,713 15,713 010 JAVELIN ................................................................................................. 219 36,175 219 36,175 219 36,175 219 36,175 012 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) .............................. 1,136 1,136 1,136 1,136 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 33,976 33,976 33,976 –3,898 30,078 

TOW Unit Cost Growth ................................................................. [–3,898 ] 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 

014 UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER ................................................................... 16,273 16,273 16,273 16,273 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 41,063 41,063 41,063 41,063 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

016 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM .................................................................. 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
804 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................................ 1,637 1,637 1,637 1,637 019 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS ............................................................. 18,394 18,394 18,394 18,394 

RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

020 RADAR SYSTEMS ................................................................................... 114,051 114,051 114,051 –12,110 101,941 

Previously funded EDM refurbishment ........................................ [–12,110 ] 

021 RQ–21 UAS ........................................................................................... 25 66,612 25 66,612 25 66,612 25 66,612 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

022 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM ........................................................................ 3,749 3,749 3,749 3,749 023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 75,979 75,979 75,979 75,979 026 RQ–11 UAV ........................................................................................... 1,653 1,653 1,653 1,653

027 DCGS-MC .............................................................................................. 9,494 9,494 9,494 9,494 

OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

028 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 6,171 6,171 6,171 6,171 

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ....................................................... 121,955 121,955 121,955 –2,000 119,955 

Unit cost growth .......................................................................... [–2,000 ] 

030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ................................................................... 83,294 83,294 83,294 83,294 031 RADIO SYSTEMS .................................................................................... 74,718 74,718 74,718 74,718 032 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................ 47,613 47,613 47,613 47,613 033 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT ........................................ 19,573 19,573 19,573 19,573 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

033A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 5,659 5,659 5,659 5,659 

ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES 

034 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES ................................................... 1,039 1,039 1,039 1,039 035 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES ........................................................... 31,050 31,050 31,050 31,050 

TACTICAL VEHICLES 

036 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) .................................................................. 36,333 36,333 36,333 36,333 037 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS .................................................... 3,137 3,137 3,137 3,137 040 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS ............................................................ 27,385 27,385 27,385 27,385 

OTHER SUPPORT 

041 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 7,016 7,016 7,016 7,016 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................................... 14,377 14,377 14,377 14,377 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
805 

043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 24,864 24,864 24,864 24,864 044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ..................................................................... 21,592 21,592 21,592 21,592 045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ............................................................ 61,353 61,353 61,353 61,353 046 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 4,827 4,827 4,827 4,827 047 EOD SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 40,011 40,011 40,011 40,011 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

048 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ......................................................... 16,809 16,809 16,809 16,809 049 GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE) ............................. 3,408 3,408 3,408 3,408 050 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ................................................................. 48,549 48,549 48,549 48,549 051 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION ................................................. 190 190 190 190 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

052 FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ................................................................. 23,129 23,129 23,129 23,129 053 TRAINING DEVICES ................................................................................ 8,346 8,346 8,346 8,346 054 CONTAINER FAMILY ............................................................................... 1,857 1,857 1,857 1,857 055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................................... 36,198 36,198 36,198 36,198 056 RAPID DEPLOYABLE KITCHEN ............................................................... 2,390 2,390 2,390 2,390 

OTHER SUPPORT 

057 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 6,525 6,525 6,525 6,525 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

058 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 13,700 13,700 13,700 13,700 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................................. 244 1,343,511 244 1,343,511 244 1,343,511 –18,008 244 1,325,503 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL FORCES 

001 F–35 ..................................................................................................... 19 3,060,770 19 3,060,770 19 3,060,770 –71,500 19 2,989,270 

Decrease non-recurring engineering initiatives .......................... [–71,500 ] 

002 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 363,783 363,783 363,783 363,783 

OTHER AIRLIFT 

005 C–130J .................................................................................................. 6 537,517 6 537,517 6 537,517 6 537,517 006 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 162,000 162,000 162,000 162,000 007 HC–130J ............................................................................................... 1 132,121 1 132,121 1 132,121 1 132,121 008 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 88,000 88,000 88,000 88,000 009 MC–130J ............................................................................................... 4 389,434 4 389,434 4 389,434 4 389,434 010 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 104,000 104,000 104,000 104,000 

HELICOPTERS 

015 CV–22 (MYP) ........................................................................................ 3 230,798 3 230,798 3 230,798 3 230,798 

MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT 

017 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C .......................................................................... 6 2,541 6 2,541 6 2,541 6 2,541 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

020 TARGET DRONES ................................................................................... 41 138,669 41 138,669 41 138,669 41 138,669 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
806 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

022 AC–130J ................................................................................................ 5 470,019 5 470,019 5 470,019 5 470,019 024 RQ–4 ..................................................................................................... 27,000 27,000 27,000 –16,000 11,000 

Production closeout ..................................................................... [–16,000 ] 

027 MQ–9 .................................................................................................... 12 272,217 18 352,217 12 242,217 6 80,000 18 352,217 

Prior year savings ....................................................................... [–30,000 ] Program increase ........................................................................ [6 ] [80,000 ] [6 ] [80,000 ] 

028 RQ–4 BLOCK 40 PROC ......................................................................... 1,747 1,747 1,747 1,747 

STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 

029 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 20,019 20,019 20,019 20,019 

030 B–1B ..................................................................................................... 132,222 132,222 132,222 132,222 031 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 111,002 110,502 111,002 –5,120 105,882 

B–52 conversions related to New START treaty implementation [–500 ] Internal Weapons Bay Upgrade defer low rate initial production. [–5,120 ] 

032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES ............................... 27,197 27,197 27,197 27,197 

TACTICAL AIRCRAFT 

033 A–10 ..................................................................................................... 47,598 47,598 47,598 47,598 034 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 354,624 354,624 354,624 354,624 035 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 11,794 11,794 11,794 11,794 036 F–22A ................................................................................................... 285,830 285,830 285,830 285,830 037 F–35 MODIFICATIONS ........................................................................... 157,777 157,777 157,777 157,777 

AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT 

038 C–5 ....................................................................................................... 2,456 2,456 2,456 2,456 

039 C–5M .................................................................................................... 1,021,967 1,021,967 1,021,967 –38,000 983,967 

Program excess ........................................................................... [–38,000 ] 

042 C–17A ................................................................................................... 143,197 143,197 143,197 143,197 043 C–21 ..................................................................................................... 103 103 103 103 044 C–32A ................................................................................................... 9,780 9,780 9,780 9,780 045 C–37A ................................................................................................... 452 452 452 452 046 C–130 AMP ........................................................................................... 8 47,300 0 

LRIP Kit Procurement .................................................................. [8 ] [47,300 ] [47,300 ] Transfer to Title II, RDAF, line 230 ............................................. [–47,300 ] 

TRAINER AIRCRAFT 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
807 

047 GLIDER MODS ....................................................................................... 128 128 128 128 048 T–6 ....................................................................................................... 6,427 6,427 6,427 6,427 049 T–1 ....................................................................................................... 277 277 277 277 050 T–38 ..................................................................................................... 28,686 28,686 28,686 28,686 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

052 U–2 MODS ............................................................................................ 45,591 45,591 45,591 45,591 

053 KC–10A (ATCA) ..................................................................................... 70,918 70,918 70,918 70,918 054 C–12 ..................................................................................................... 1,876 1,876 1,876 1,876 055 MC–12W ............................................................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 056 C–20 MODS .......................................................................................... 192 192 192 192 057 VC–25A MOD ........................................................................................ 263 263 263 263 058 C–40 ..................................................................................................... 6,119 6,119 6,119 6,119 059 C–130 ................................................................................................... 58,577 74,277 105,877 15,700 74,277 

C–130 avionics upgrades ........................................................... [47,300 ] C–130H Propulsion System Engine Upgrades ............................ [15,700 ] [15,700 ] 

061 C–130J MODS ....................................................................................... 10,475 10,475 10,475 10,475 

062 C–135 ................................................................................................... 46,556 46,556 46,556 46,556 063 COMPASS CALL MODS .......................................................................... 34,494 34,494 34,494 34,494 064 RC–135 ................................................................................................. 171,813 171,813 171,813 171,813 065 E–3 ....................................................................................................... 197,087 197,087 197,087 197,087 066 E–4 ....................................................................................................... 14,304 14,304 14,304 14,304 067 E–8 ....................................................................................................... 57,472 57,472 57,472 57,472 068 H–1 ....................................................................................................... 6,627 6,627 6,627 6,627 069 H–60 ..................................................................................................... 27,654 27,654 27,654 27,654 070 RQ–4 MODS .......................................................................................... 9,313 9,313 9,313 9,313 071 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS ................................................................ 16,300 16,300 16,300 16,300 072 OTHER AIRCRAFT .................................................................................. 6,948 6,948 6,948 6,948 073 MQ–1 MODS ......................................................................................... 9,734 9,734 9,734 9,734 074 MQ–9 MODS ......................................................................................... 102,970 102,970 68,470 –40,000 62,970 

Anti-ice production ahead of need ............................................. [–5,520 ] Lynx radar reduction ................................................................... [–34,500 ] [–34,480 ] 

076 RQ–4 GSRA/CSRA MODS ...................................................................... 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 077 CV–22 MODS ........................................................................................ 23,310 23,310 23,310 23,310 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

078 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ............................................................. 463,285 25 639,285 463,285 463,285 

F100–229 spare engine shortfall ............................................... [25 ] [165,000 ] MQ–9 spares ............................................................................... [11,000 ] 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ........................................... 49,140 49,140 49,140 49,140 

POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
808 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

081 B–1 ....................................................................................................... 3,683 3,683 3,683 3,683 083 B–2A ..................................................................................................... 43,786 43,786 43,786 43,786 084 B–52 ..................................................................................................... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 087 C–17A ................................................................................................... 81,952 81,952 81,952 81,952 089 C–135 ................................................................................................... 8,597 8,597 8,597 8,597 090 F–15 ..................................................................................................... 2,403 2,403 2,403 2,403 091 F–16 ..................................................................................................... 3,455 3,455 3,455 3,455 092 F–22A ................................................................................................... 5,911 5,911 5,911 5,911 

INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS 

094 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS ............................................................. 21,148 21,148 21,148 21,148 

WAR CONSUMABLES 

095 WAR CONSUMABLES ............................................................................. 94,947 94,947 94,947 94,947 

OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES 

096 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES ............................................................ 1,242,004 1,242,004 1,242,004 1,242,004

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

101A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 75,845 67,545 75,845 75,845 

Program Decrease ....................................................................... [–8,300 ] 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....................... 97 11,398,901 136 11,709,101 97 11,381,701 6 –74,920 103 11,323,981 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC 

001 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC ................................................. 39,104 39,104 39,104 39,104 

TACTICAL 

002 JASSM ................................................................................................... 183 291,151 183 291,151 183 291,151 183 291,151 003 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) .......................................................................... 225 119,904 225 119,904 225 119,904 225 119,904 004 AMRAAM ................................................................................................ 199 340,015 199 340,015 199 340,015 199 340,015 005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE .............................................................. 413 48,548 413 48,548 413 48,548 413 48,548 006 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB ....................................................................... 144 42,347 144 42,347 144 42,347 144 42,347 

INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES 

007 INDUSTR’L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION .......................................... 752 752 752 752 

CLASS IV 

009 MM III MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 21,635 21,635 21,635 21,635 010 AGM–65D MAVERICK ............................................................................ 276 276 276 276 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
809 

011 AGM–88A HARM ................................................................................... 580 580 580 580 012 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) .................................................. 6,888 6,888 6,888 6,888 013 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB ....................................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

014 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS ............................................................. 72,080 71,377 72,080 72,080 

Spares and repair parts related to New START treaty implementation. [–703 ] 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

015 ADVANCED EHF ..................................................................................... 379,586 379,586 379,586 379,586 

016 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE) .......................................... 38,398 38,398 38,398 38,398 017 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT ...................................................................... 2 403,431 2 403,431 2 403,431 2 403,431 018 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 74,167 74,167 74,167 74,167 019 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) ............................................................ 5,244 5,244 5,244 5,244 020 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) ............................................................. 55,997 55,997 55,997 55,997 021 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE) ........................................... 95,673 95,673 95,673 95,673 022 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) ...................................... 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900 5 1,852,900 023 SBIR HIGH (SPACE) .............................................................................. 583,192 583,192 583,192 583,192 

SPECIAL PROGRAMS 

029 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS ............................................................... 36,716 36,716 36,716 36,716 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

029A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 829,702 829,702 829,702 829,702

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......................... 1,171 5,343,286 1,171 5,342,583 1,171 5,343,286 1,171 5,343,286 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ............................................................................................... 15,735 15,735 15,735 15,735 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ......................................................................................... 129,921 129,921 129,921 129,921 

BOMBS 

003 PRACTICE BOMBS ................................................................................. 30,840 30,840 30,840 30,840 004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 187,397 187,397 187,397 187,397 005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION .......................................................... 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 6,965 188,510 

OTHER ITEMS 

006 CAD/PAD ............................................................................................... 35,837 35,837 35,837 35,837 

007 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) .............................................. 7,531 7,531 7,531 7,531 008 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 499 499 499 499 009 MODIFICATIONS ..................................................................................... 480 480 480 480 010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 9,765 9,765 9,765 9,765 

FLARES 

011 FLARES .................................................................................................. 55,864 55,864 55,864 55,864 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
810 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

FUZES 

013 FUZES ................................................................................................... 76,037 76,037 76,037 76,037 

SMALL ARMS 

014 SMALL ARMS ......................................................................................... 21,026 21,026 21,026 21,026 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ............ 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442 6,965 759,442 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES 

001 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES ........................................................ 2,048 2,048 2,048 2,048 

CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES 

002 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE ................................................................. 8,019 8,019 8,019 8,019 003 CAP VEHICLES ...................................................................................... 946 946 946 946 004 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 

SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES 

005 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES ..................................................... 13,093 13,093 13,093 13,093 006 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 13,983 13,983 13,983 13,983 

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT 

007 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES ........................................... 23,794 23,794 23,794 23,794 

MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT 

008 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 8,669 8,669 8,669 8,669 

BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 

009 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP ........................................ 6,144 6,144 6,144 6,144 010 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 1,580 1,580 1,580 1,580 

COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) 

012 COMSEC EQUIPMENT ............................................................................ 149,661 149,661 149,661 149,661

013 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) ................................................................... 726 726 726 726 

INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS 

014 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT ................................................... 2,789 2,789 2,789 2,789 015 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT ........................................................ 31,875 31,875 31,875 31,875 016 ADVANCE TECH SENSORS ..................................................................... 452 452 452 452 017 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS ............................................................... 14,203 14,203 14,203 14,203 

ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

018 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS ............................................... 46,232 46,232 46,232 46,232 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
811 

019 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM ............................................................... 11,685 11,685 11,685 11,685 020 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED ...................................................... 19,248 19,248 19,248 19,248 021 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS ...................................... 19,292 19,292 19,292 19,292 022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ..................................................... 17,166 17,166 17,166 17,166 023 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL .................................................. 22,723 22,723 22,723 22,723 024 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX .......................................................... 27,930 27,930 27,930 27,930 025 TAC SIGNIT SPT .................................................................................... 217 217 217 217 

SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS 

027 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ................................................. 49,627 49,627 49,627 49,627 028 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS .............................................. 13,559 13,559 13,559 13,559 029 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL .................................................... 11,186 11,186 11,186 11,186 030 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM ............................................ 43,238 43,238 43,238 43,238 031 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES .................................................................. 10,431 10,431 10,431 10,431 032 C3 COUNTERMEASURES ....................................................................... 13,769 13,769 13,769 13,769 033 GCSS-AF FOS ........................................................................................ 19,138 19,138 19,138 19,138 034 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM ...................................................... 8,809 8,809 8,809 8,809 035 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS ........................................... 26,935 26,935 26,935 26,935 

AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS 

036 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS .................................................... 80,558 80,558 80,558 80,558 038 AFNET .................................................................................................... 97,588 97,588 97,588 97,588 039 VOICE SYSTEMS .................................................................................... 8,419 8,419 8,419 8,419 040 USCENTCOM .......................................................................................... 34,276 34,276 34,276 34,276 

SPACE PROGRAMS 

041 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE ................................................ 28,235 28,235 28,235 28,235 042 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE ............................................................................ 2,061 2,061 2,061 2,061 043 NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE ............................................................. 4,415 4,415 4,415 4,415 044 AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE ........................................... 30,237 30,237 30,237 30,237 045 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE ....................................................... 98,062 98,062 98,062 98,062 046 MILSATCOM SPACE ............................................................................... 105,935 105,935 105,935 105,935 

047 SPACE MODS SPACE ............................................................................. 37,861 37,861 37,861 37,861 048 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM ...................................................................... 7,171 7,171 7,171 7,171 

ORGANIZATION AND BASE 

049 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT .................................................................... 83,537 83,537 83,537 83,537 050 COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATER ................................................. 11,884 11,884 11,884 –3,250 8,634 

Unjustified unit cost growth for batteries .................................. [–3,250 ] 

051 RADIO EQUIPMENT ................................................................................ 14,711 14,711 14,711 14,711 052 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 10,275 10,275 10,275 10,275 053 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................ 50,907 50,907 50,907 50,907 

MODIFICATIONS 

054 COMM ELECT MODS ............................................................................. 55,701 55,701 55,701 55,701 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
812 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP 

055 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES ........................................................................ 14,524 14,524 14,524 –10,488 4,036 

Night Vision Cueing and Display termination ............................ [–10,488 ] 

056 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 28,655 28,655 28,655 28,655 

DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ 

057 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP ........................................... 9,332 9,332 9,332 9,332 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

058 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT .............................................................. 16,762 16,762 16,762 16,762 059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .................................................................. 33,768 33,768 33,768 33,768 060 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT ................................................... 2,495 2,495 2,495 2,495 061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 12,859 12,859 12,859 12,859 062 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,954 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

064 DARP RC135 ......................................................................................... 24,528 24,528 24,528 24,528 065 DCGS-AF ............................................................................................... 137,819 137,819 137,819 137,819 067 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM ................................................................. 479,586 479,586 479,586 479,586 068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. .......................................... 45,159 45,159 45,159 45,159 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 14,519,256 14,519,256 14,519,256 14,519,256 

SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

069 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 25,746 25,746 25,746 25,746 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............................ 16,760,581 16,760,581 16,760,581 –13,738 16,746,843 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA 

001 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 1,291 1,291 1,291 1,291 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA 

002 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 5,711 5,711 5,711 5,711 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA 

003 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 47,201 47,201 47,201 47,201 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

009 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY ....................................................... 16,189 16,189 16,189 16,189 012 TELEPORT PROGRAM ............................................................................ 66,075 66,075 66,075 66,075 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
813 

013 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION ............................................................. 83,881 83,881 83,881 83,881 014 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ...................................... 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 015 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK ......................................... 125,557 125,557 125,557 125,557 017 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ................................................................ 16,941 16,941 16,941 16,941 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA 

018 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 13,137 13,137 13,137 13,137 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT 

019 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 5 15,414 5 15,414 5 15,414 5 15,414 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA 

020 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS ............................ 1,454 1,454 1,454 1,454 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY 

021 EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................... 978 978 978 978 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS 

022 MAJOR EQUIPMENT ............................................................................... 5,020 5,020 5,020 5,020 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY 

023 VEHICLES .............................................................................................. 2 100 2 100 2 100 2 100 

024 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 3 13,395 3 13,395 3 13,395 3 13,395

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY 

026 THAAD ................................................................................................... 36 581,005 36 581,005 36 581,005 36 581,005 

027 AEGIS BMD ........................................................................................... 52 580,814 52 580,814 52 580,814 52 580,814 028 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS ..................................................................... 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 029 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III ...................................................................... 1 131,400 1 131,400 1 131,400 1 131,400 

031 IRON DOME ........................................................................................... 1 220,309 1 220,309 1 220,309 1 220,309 033 ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) ........................................................ 107,000 0 

Advance Procurement of 14 GBIs, beginning with booster 

motor sets.

[107,000 ] 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA 

039 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) ........................... 14,363 14,363 14,363 14,363 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD 

040 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD ...................................................................... 37,345 37,345 37,345 37,345 041 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, INTELLIGENCE ...................................................... 16,678 16,678 16,678 16,678 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS 

042 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS ........................................................................ 14,792 14,792 14,792 14,792 

MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS 

043 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS ...................................................................... 35,259 35,259 35,259 35,259 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 544,272 544,272 544,272 544,272

AVIATION PROGRAMS 

045 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT ..................................... 112,456 112,456 112,456 112,456 046 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 81,457 81,457 81,457 81,457 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
814 

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

047 NON-STANDARD AVIATION ..................................................................... 2,650 2,650 2,650 2,650 048 U–28 ..................................................................................................... 56,208 56,208 56,208 56,208 049 MH–47 CHINOOK .................................................................................. 19,766 19,766 19,766 19,766 050 RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE .................................................... 850 850 850 850 051 CV–22 MODIFICATION ........................................................................... 3 98,927 3 98,927 3 98,927 3 98,927 052 MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ..................................................... 20,576 20,576 20,576 20,576 053 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ..................................................... 1,893 1,893 14,893 13,000 14,893 

Capability Improvements ............................................................. [13,000 ] [13,000 ] 

055 STUASL0 ................................................................................................ 13,166 13,166 13,166 13,166 

056 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE ................................................................ 107,687 107,687 107,687 107,687 057 AC/MC–130J ......................................................................................... 51,870 51,870 51,870 51,870 059 C–130 MODIFICATIONS ......................................................................... 71,940 71,940 71,940 –10,623 61,317 

C–130 TF/TA—early to need ...................................................... [–10,623 ] 

SHIPBUILDING 

061 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS ........................................................................ 37,439 37,439 37,439 37,439 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

063 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M ...................................................................... 159,029 159,029 159,029 159,029 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 79,819 79,819 79,819 79,819 068 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS .......................... 14,906 14,906 14,906 14,906 070 OTHER ITEMS <$5M ............................................................................. 81,711 81,711 81,711 81,711 071 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS ............................................................... 35,053 35,053 33,897 –1,156 33,897 

CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request ................................... [–1,156 ] [–1,156 ] 

074 SPECIAL PROGRAMS ............................................................................. 41,526 41,526 41,526 41,526 075 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 43,353 43,353 43,353 43,353 076 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M .................................................................... 210,540 210,540 210,540 210,540 078 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 082 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ........................................... 6,645 6,645 6,645 6,645 083 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ..................................... 25,581 25,581 25,581 25,581 089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................. 191,061 191,061 191,061 191,061 

CBDP 

091 INSTALLATION FORCE PROTECTION ...................................................... 14,271 14,271 14,271 14,271 092 INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION ...................................................................... 101,667 101,667 101,667 101,667 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
815 

094 JOINT BIO DEFENSE PROGRAM (MEDICAL) ........................................... 13,447 13,447 13,447 13,447 095 COLLECTIVE PROTECTION ..................................................................... 20,896 20,896 20,896 20,896 096 CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE ................................................................ 144,540 144,540 144,540 144,540 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................. 103 4,534,083 103 4,641,083 103 4,545,927 1,221 103 4,535,304 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND .......................................... 98,800 98,800 –98,800 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–98,800 ] [–98,800 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ................ 98,800 98,800 –98,800 0 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT ............................................................. 229,104 98,227,168 227,777 99,666,171 197,783 98,151,289 –31,305 215,081 197,799 98,442,249 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
816 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY FIXED WING 

002 SATURN ARCH (MIP) ............................................................................. 4 48,000 4 48,000 4 48,000 4 48,000 

004 MQ–1 UAV ............................................................................................ 4 31,988 4 31,988 4 31,988 4 31,988 

ROTARY 

009 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD ............................................... 4 142,000 4 142,000 4 142,000 4 142,000 011 KIOWA WARRIOR WRA ........................................................................... 14 163,800 14 163,800 14 163,800 14 163,800 

014 CH–47 HELICOPTER .............................................................................. 10 386,000 10 386,000 10 386,000 10 386,000 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................ 36 771,788 36 771,788 36 771,788 36 771,788 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM 

003 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY ...................................................................... 550 54,000 550 79,887 550 54,000 550 54,000 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [25,887 ] 

ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS 

007 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) .......................................................... 383 39,045 383 39,045 383 39,045 383 39,045 

010 ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM ................................. 38 35,600 38 35,600 38 35,600 38 35,600 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY ................................... 971 128,645 971 154,532 971 128,645 971 128,645 

PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH 

033 M16 RIFLE MODS .................................................................................. 15,422 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [15,422 ] 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY .............................. 15,422 0 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION 

002 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
817 

004 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 005 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES ..................................................................... 5,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [5,000 ] 

008 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES ........................................................................ 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 

MORTAR AMMUNITION 

010 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES .................................................................. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

ARTILLERY AMMUNITION 

014 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES ....................... 10,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [20,000 ] 

015 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES ....................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 016 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 ................................................ 120 11,000 120 11,000 120 11,000 120 11,000 

MINES 

018 MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES .......................................... 9,482 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [9,482 ] 

ROCKETS 

021 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES ........................................................... 57,000 57,000 57,000 57,000 

OTHER AMMUNITION 

022 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 023 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 024 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 

MISCELLANEOUS 

028 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES ............................................................................. 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY ..................... 120 180,900 120 215,382 120 180,900 120 180,900 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TACTICAL VEHICLES 

003 FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) .......................................... 2,500 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [2,500 ] 

005 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) .................................... 2,050 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [2,050 ] 

013 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS ........................ 321,040 562,596 321,040 321,040 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [241,556 ] 

COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS 

060 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM ....................... 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
818 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) 

067 DCGS-A (MIP) ....................................................................................... 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 071 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) ................................ 5,980 5,980 5,980 5,980 

ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

074 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR ............................................. 67 57,800 67 83,255 67 57,800 67 57,800 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [25,455 ] 

078 FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE ........................... 15,300 15,300 15,300 15,300 079 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES ...................... 4,221 4,221 4,221 4,221 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) 

091 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP ............................................................... 34 1,834 34 1,834 34 1,834 34 1,834 093 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) .................................... 8,400 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [8,400 ] 

096 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) ............................................................. 137 21,000 137 21,000 137 21,000 137 21,000 

098 COUNTERFIRE RADARS ......................................................................... 4 85,830 4 85,830 4 85,830 4 85,830 

ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS 

110 MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) ................................................... 3,200 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [3,200 ] 

112 SINGLE ARMY LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE (SALE) ..................................... 5,160 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [5,160 ] 

CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT 

126 FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) ........................................ 15,000 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [15,000 ] 

127 BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) ........................................................... 24,932 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [24,932 ] 

ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT 

137 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) ...................... 3,565 0 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
819 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [3,565 ] 

COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

146 FORCE PROVIDER ................................................................................. 3 51,654 3 51,654 3 51,654 3 51,654 

147 FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT .................................................................. 18 6,264 18 6,264 18 6,264 18 6,264 

PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT 

152 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER .................................. 2,119 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [2,119 ] 

TRAINING EQUIPMENT 

176 COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT ................................................ 7,000 0 

Restoral of funds based on offsets used for April 2013 reprogramming. [7,000 ] 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY ..................................... 263 603,123 263 944,060 263 603,123 263 603,123 

JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND NETWORK ATTACK 

001 ATTACK THE NETWORK ......................................................................... 417,700 417,700 417,700 417,700 

JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT 

002 DEFEAT THE DEVICE ............................................................................. 248,886 248,886 248,886 248,886 

FORCE TRAINING 

003 TRAIN THE FORCE ................................................................................. 106,000 106,000 106,000 

Program decrease ........................................................................ [–106,000 ] 

STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE 

004 OPERATIONS .......................................................................................... 227,414 227,414 182,414 –45,000 182,414 

Program decrease ........................................................................ [–45,000 ] [–45,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND ................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 849,000 –45,000 955,000 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY COMBAT AIRCRAFT 

011 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) .......................................................... 1 29,520 1 29,520 1 29,520 1 29,520 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

026 MQ–8 UAV ............................................................................................ 1 13,100 1 13,100 1 13,100 1 13,100 

MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT 

031 AV–8 SERIES ........................................................................................ 57,652 57,652 57,652 57,652 

033 F–18 SERIES ......................................................................................... 35,500 35,500 35,500 35,500 039 EP–3 SERIES ........................................................................................ 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 049 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT ................................................................ 3,375 3,375 3,375 3,375 054 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT ................................................................... 49,183 49,183 49,183 49,183 055 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES .............................................................. 4,190 4,190 4,190 4,190 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
820 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

059 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION ..................................................................... 20,700 20,700 20,700 20,700 

AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS 

065 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS ................................................................. 24,776 24,776 24,776 24,776 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 2 240,696 2 240,696 2 240,696 2 240,696 

WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY TACTICAL MISSILES 

009 HELLFIRE ............................................................................................... 270 27,000 270 27,000 270 27,000 270 27,000 010 LASER MAVERICK .................................................................................. 500 58,000 500 58,000 500 58,000 500 58,000 011 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) .......................... 9 1,500 9 1,500 9 1,500 9 1,500 

TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY ................................. 779 86,500 779 86,500 779 86,500 779 86,500 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC NAVY AMMUNITION 

001 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 11,424 11,424 11,424 11,424 002 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES .......................................................... 30,332 30,332 30,332 30,332 003 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION ................................................................. 8,282 8,282 8,282 8,282 006 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES ................................................ 31,884 31,884 31,884 31,884 011 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION ............................................................ 409 409 409 409 012 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO ............................................... 11,976 11,976 11,976 11,976 013 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION .......................................................... 2,447 2,447 2,447 2,447 014 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION .................................................. 7,692 7,692 7,692 7,692 

MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION 

015 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION ................................................................... 13,461 13,461 13,461 13,461 016 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES .............................................................. 3,310 3,310 3,310 3,310 017 40 MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 6,244 6,244 6,244 6,244 018 60MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 3,368 3,368 3,368 3,368 019 81MM, ALL TYPES ................................................................................. 9,162 9,162 9,162 9,162 020 120MM, ALL TYPES ............................................................................... 10,266 10,266 10,266 10,266 021 CTG 25MM, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 1,887 1,887 1,887 1,887 022 GRENADES, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 023 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES ............................................................................ 37,459 37,459 37,459 37,459 024 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES ......................................................................... 970 970 970 970 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
821 

025 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES .................................................... 418 418 418 418 026 FUZE, ALL TYPES .................................................................................. 14,219 14,219 14,219 14,219 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC ...................... 206,821 206,821 206,821 206,821 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

135 TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................................. 17,968 17,968 17,968 17,968 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY ...................................... 17,968 17,968 17,968 17,968 

PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS GUIDED MISSILES 

010 JAVELIN ................................................................................................. 180 29,334 180 29,334 180 29,334 180 29,334 

011 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW .......................................................................... 105 105 105 105 

OTHER SUPPORT 

013 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 16,081 16,081 16,081 –2,898 13,183 

TOW Unit Cost Growth ................................................................. [–2,898 ] 

REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT 

015 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT ............................................................. 16,081 16,081 16,081 16,081 

OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) 

017 MODIFICATION KITS ............................................................................... 2,831 2,831 2,831 2,831 

COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) 

018 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) ........................................ 8,170 8,170 8,170 8,170 

INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) 

023 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ................................................... 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 026 RQ–11 UAV ........................................................................................... 2,830 2,830 2,830 2,830

OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) 

029 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES ....................................................... 4,866 4,866 4,866 4,866 030 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS ................................................................... 265 265 265 265 

ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT 

042 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT .......................................... 114 114 114 114 043 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 523 523 523 523 044 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS ..................................................................... 365 365 365 365 045 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED ............................................................ 2,004 2,004 2,004 2,004 047 EOD SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 42,930 42,930 42,930 42,930 

GENERAL PROPERTY 

055 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................................... 385 385 385 385 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS ................................. 180 129,584 180 129,584 180 129,584 –2,898 180 126,686 

AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
822 

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item 

FY 2014 

Request 

House 

Authorized 

Senate 

Authorized 

Agreement 

Change 

Agreement 

Authorized 

Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost Qty Cost 

032 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES ............................... 94,050 94,050 94,050 94,050 

OTHER AIRCRAFT 

052 U–2 MODS ............................................................................................ 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 059 C–130 ................................................................................................... 1,618 1,618 1,618 1,618 064 RC–135 ................................................................................................. 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 

COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

079 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP ........................................... 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 

TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ....................... 115,668 115,668 115,668 115,668 

MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TACTICAL 

005 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE .............................................................. 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 

TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE .......................... 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 211 24,200 

PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ROCKETS 

001 ROCKETS ............................................................................................... 326 326 326 326 

CARTRIDGES 

002 CARTRIDGES ......................................................................................... 17,634 17,634 17,634 17,634 

BOMBS 

004 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS .................................................................. 37,514 37,514 37,514 37,514 005 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION .......................................................... 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459 2,879 84,459 

FLARES 

011 FLARES .................................................................................................. 14,973 14,973 14,973 14,973 

012 FUZES ................................................................................................... 3,859 3,859 3,859 3,859 

SMALL ARMS 

014 SMALL ARMS ......................................................................................... 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE ............ 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965 2,879 159,965 

OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS 

022 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST ..................................................... 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 

SPACE PROGRAMS 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
823 

046 MILSATCOM SPACE ............................................................................... 5,695 5,695 5,695 5,695 

BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 

059 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS .................................................................. 60,600 60,600 60,600 60,600 061 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT ........................................................................... 68,000 68,000 68,000 68,000 

SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS 

068 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. .......................................... 58,250 58,250 58,250 58,250 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

068A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 2,380,501 2,380,501 2,380,501 2,380,501 

TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE ............................ 2,574,846 2,574,846 2,574,846 2,574,846 

PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA 

012 TELEPORT PROGRAM ............................................................................ 4,760 4,760 4,760 4,760 

CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS 

043A CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ........................................................................ 78,986 78,986 78,986 78,986 

AMMUNITION PROGRAMS 

062 ORDNANCE REPLENISHMENT ................................................................ 25 2,841 25 2,841 25 2,841 25 2,841 

OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS 

066 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 1 13,300 1 13,300 1 13,300 1 13,300 

084 SOLDIER PROTECTION AND SURVIVAL SYSTEMS .................................. 53 8,034 53 8,034 53 8,034 53 8,034 089 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ............................................................. 126 3,354 126 3,354 126 3,354 126 3,354 

TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE .................................. 205 111,275 205 111,275 205 111,275 205 111,275 

JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND 

001 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND .......................................... 15,000 15,000 –15,000 0 

Program reduction ....................................................................... [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND ................ 15,000 15,000 –15,000 0 

NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT UNDISTRIBUTED 

999 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ............................................................... 400,000 400,000 400,000 

Program increase ........................................................................ [400,000 ] [400,000 ] 

TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT ................. 400,000 400,000 400,000 TOTAL PROCUREMENT ............................................................. 5,646 6,366,979 5,646 7,168,707 5,646 6,215,979 337,102 5,646 6,704,081 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
824 

TITLE XLII—RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND 

EVALUATION 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION. 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601101A IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ......................................... 21,803 21,803 21,803 21,803 002 0601102A DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 221,901 221,901 221,901 221,901 

003 0601103A UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 79,359 79,359 79,359 79,359 004 0601104A UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS ........................................... 113,662 113,662 113,662 113,662

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 436,725 436,725 436,725 436,725 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

005 0602105A MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................. 26,585 26,585 26,585 26,585 

006 0602120A SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY .................................................... 43,170 43,170 43,170 43,170 007 0602122A TRACTOR HIP .................................................................................................... 36,293 36,293 36,293 36,293 008 0602211A AVIATION TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 55,615 55,615 55,615 55,615 009 0602270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .............................................................. 17,585 17,585 17,585 17,585 010 0602303A MISSILE TECHNOLOGY ...................................................................................... 51,528 51,528 51,528 51,528 011 0602307A ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................. 26,162 26,162 26,162 26,162 012 0602308A ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION ......................................................... 24,063 24,063 24,063 24,063 013 0602601A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY ......................................... 64,589 64,589 64,589 64,589 014 0602618A BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................. 68,300 68,300 78,300 8,000 76,300 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
825 

WIAMan schedule adjustment ................................................................ [10,000 ] [8,000 ] 

015 0602622A CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY ...................... 4,490 4,490 4,490 4,490 016 0602623A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .......................................................... 7,818 7,818 7,818 7,818 017 0602624A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ........................................................ 37,798 37,798 37,798 37,798 

018 0602705A ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES ....................................................... 59,021 59,021 59,021 59,021 019 0602709A NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 43,426 43,426 43,426 43,426 020 0602712A COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 20,574 20,574 20,574 20,574 021 0602716A HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 21,339 21,339 21,339 21,339 022 0602720A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY ......................................................... 20,316 20,316 20,316 20,316 023 0602782A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY ................................. 34,209 34,209 34,209 34,209 024 0602783A COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY ....................................................... 10,439 10,439 10,439 10,439025 0602784A MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 70,064 70,064 70,064 70,064 026 0602785A MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 027 0602786A WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY .............................................................................. 31,546 31,546 31,546 31,546 028 0602787A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 93,340 93,340 93,340 93,340 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 885,924 885,924 895,924 8,000 893,924 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

029 0603001A WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................................ 56,056 56,056 56,056 56,056 

030 0603002A MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................................. 62,032 62,032 62,032 62,032 031 0603003A AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................................. 81,080 81,080 81,080 81,080 032 0603004A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................................... 63,919 63,919 63,919 63,919 033 0603005A COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................... 97,043 97,043 97,043 97,043 034 0603006A SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 5,866 5,866 5,866 5,866 035 0603007A MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................ 7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 036 0603008A ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................ 40,416 40,416 40,416 40,416 037 0603009A TRACTOR HIKE .................................................................................................. 9,166 9,166 9,166 9,166 038 0603015A NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS ................................... 13,627 13,627 13,627 13,627 039 0603020A TRACTOR ROSE ................................................................................................ 10,667 10,667 10,667 10,667 041 0603125A COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................ 15,054 15,054 15,054 15,054 042 0603130A TRACTOR NAIL .................................................................................................. 3,194 3,194 3,194 3,194 043 0603131A TRACTOR EGGS ................................................................................................ 2,367 2,367 2,367 2,367 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
826 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

044 0603270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY .............................................................. 25,348 25,348 25,348 25,348 045 0603313A MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ............................................. 64,009 64,009 64,009 64,009 046 0603322A TRACTOR CAGE ................................................................................................ 11,083 11,083 11,083 11,083 047 0603461A HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ....................... 180,662 180,662 180,662 180,662 048 0603606A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ........................ 22,806 22,806 22,806 22,806 049 0603607A JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM .......................................................... 5,030 5,030 5,030 5,030 050 0603710A NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......................................................... 36,407 36,407 36,407 36,407 051 0603728A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ........................... 11,745 11,745 11,745 11,745 052 0603734A MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 23,717 23,717 23,717 23,717 053 0603772A ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ......... 33,012 33,012 33,012 33,012 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 882,106 882,106 882,106 882,106 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

054 0603305A ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ............................................. 15,301 15,301 15,301 15,301 055 0603308A ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION .............................................................. 13,592 13,592 13,592 13,592 

056 0603619A LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV .............................................. 10,625 10,625 10,625 –10,625 0 

Program deferred to fiscal year 2019 .................................................... [–10,625 ] 

058 0603639A TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION ...................................................... 30,612 30,612 30,612 30,612 059 0603653A ADVANCED TANK ARMAMENT SYSTEM (ATAS) ................................................. 49,989 49,989 49,989 49,989 060 0603747A SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY ........................................................... 6,703 6,703 6,703 6,703 061 0603766A TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV ........................... 6,894 6,894 6,894 6,894 062 0603774A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 9,066 9,066 9,066 9,066 063 0603779A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL ....................................... 2,633 2,633 2,633 2,633 064 0603782A WARFIGHTER INFORMATION NETWORK-TACTICAL—DEM/VAL .......................... 272,384 272,384 272,384 –37,000 235,384 

Excess program growth .......................................................................... [–37,000 ] 

065 0603790A NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 3,874 3,874 3,874 3,874066 0603801A AVIATION—ADV DEV ........................................................................................ 5,018 5,018 5,018 5,018 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
827 

067 0603804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV ......................................... 11,556 11,556 11,556 11,556 069 0603807A MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV ........................................................................ 15,603 15,603 15,603 15,603 070 0603827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 14,159 14,159 14,159 14,159 071 0603850A INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE .................................................................. 79 79 79 79 072 0604115A TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES ........................................................... 55,605 55,605 55,605 55,605 074 0604319A INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2) 79,232 79,232 79,232 79,232 075 0604785A INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4) ........................................ 4,476 4,476 4,476 4,476 076 0305205A ENDURANCE UAVS ............................................................................................ 28,991 991 –28,991 0 

LEMV termination .................................................................................... [–28,000 ] [–28,991 ] [–28,991 ] 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 636,392 608,392 607,401 –76,616 559,776 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

077 0604201A AIRCRAFT AVIONICS ......................................................................................... 76,588 76,588 76,588 76,588 078 0604220A ARMED, DEPLOYABLE HELOS ........................................................................... 73,309 73,309 73,309 73,309 079 0604270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 154,621 154,621 154,621 154,621 080 0604280A JOINT TACTICAL RADIO ..................................................................................... 31,826 31,826 31,826 31,826 081 0604290A MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) ........................................ 23,341 23,341 23,341 23,341 082 0604321A ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM ...................................................................... 4,839 4,839 4,839 4,839 

083 0604328A TRACTOR CAGE ................................................................................................ 23,841 23,841 23,841 23,841 084 0604601A INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS ......................................................................... 79,855 90,855 79,855 11,000 90,855 

Transfer from WTCV line 15—XM25 development ................................ [11,000 ] [11,000 ] 

085 0604604A MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................................................... 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140 

086 0604611A JAVELIN ............................................................................................................. 5,002 5,002 5,002 5,002 087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES ........................................................... 21,321 21,321 21,321 21,321 

088 0604633A AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................................................................... 514 514 514 514 093 0604710A NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV ................................................................. 43,405 43,405 43,405 43,405 094 0604713A COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT .............................................. 1,939 1,939 1,939 1,939 095 0604715A NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV .................................................. 18,980 18,980 18,980 18,980 097 0604741A AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV .............. 18,294 18,294 18,294 18,294 098 0604742A CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 17,013 17,013 17,013 17,013 099 0604746A AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT .................................................. 6,701 6,701 6,701 6,701 100 0604760A DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV ........................... 14,575 14,575 14,575 14,575 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
828 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

101 0604780A COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE ........................................ 27,634 27,634 27,634 27,634 102 0604798A BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION ...................................... 193,748 193,748 193,748 193,748 103 0604802A WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV ............................................................ 15,721 15,721 15,721 15,721 104 0604804A LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV ......................................... 41,703 41,703 41,703 41,703 105 0604805A COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV ..................... 7,379 7,379 7,379 7,379 106 0604807A MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV 39,468 39,468 39,468 39,468 107 0604808A LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV ...................................................... 92,285 92,285 92,285 92,285 108 0604814A ARTILLERY MUNITIONS—EMD .......................................................................... 8,209 8,209 8,209 8,209 109 0604818A ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE ................ 22,958 22,958 22,958 22,958 110 0604820A RADAR DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................... 1,549 1,549 1,549 1,549 111 0604822A GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) .............................. 17,342 17,342 227 –17,115 227 

Excess to requirement ............................................................................ [–17,115 ] [–17,115 ] 

112 0604823A FIREFINDER ....................................................................................................... 47,221 47,221 47,221 47,221 113 0604827A SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL ......................................................... 48,477 48,477 48,477 48,477 114 0604854A ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD ............................................................................. 80,613 80,613 121,313 40,700 121,313 

Transfer from WTCV 6 at Army Request ................................................ [40,700 ] [40,700 ] 

117 0605013A INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 68,814 68,814 68,814 68,814 118 0605018A INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) ........................... 137,290 137,290 137,290 137,290 119 0605028A ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) .................................................. 116,298 116,298 116,298 116,298 

120 0605030A JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) ...................................................... 68,148 68,148 68,148 68,148 121 0605380A AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS) .................................................... 33,219 33,219 33,219 33,219 122 0605450A JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ........................................................... 15,127 15,127 15,127 15,127 124 0605456A PAC–3/MSE MISSILE ........................................................................................ 68,843 68,843 68,843 68,843 125 0605457A ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) ................................ 364,649 364,649 364,649 364,649 126 0605625A MANNED GROUND VEHICLE .............................................................................. 592,201 592,201 592,201 592,201 127 0605626A AERIAL COMMON SENSOR ................................................................................ 10,382 10,382 10,382 10,382 128 0605766A NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) ................................................... 21,143 21,143 21,143 21,143 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
829 

129 0605812A JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING 

DEVELOPMENT PH.

84,230 84,230 84,230 84,230 

130 0303032A TROJAN—RH12 ................................................................................................ 3,465 3,465 3,465 3,465 131 0304270A ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 10,806 10,806 10,806 10,806 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 2,857,026 2,868,026 2,880,611 34,585 2,891,611 

RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

132 0604256A THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 16,934 16,934 16,934 16,934 133 0604258A TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 13,488 13,488 13,488 13,488 134 0604759A MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 46,672 46,672 46,672 46,672 135 0605103A RAND ARROYO CENTER .................................................................................... 11,919 11,919 11,919 11,919 136 0605301A ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL .................................................................................. 193,658 193,658 193,658 193,658 137 0605326A CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM ........................................................ 37,158 37,158 37,158 37,158 139 0605601A ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES ............................................................... 340,659 340,659 340,659 340,659 140 0605602A ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS ............................. 66,061 66,061 66,061 66,061 141 0605604A SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS ................................................................ 43,280 43,280 43,280 43,280 143 0605606A AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION ................................................................................. 6,025 6,025 6,025 6,025 144 0605702A METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES ........................................ 7,349 7,349 7,349 7,349 145 0605706A MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 19,809 19,809 19,809 19,809 146 0605709A EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS ................................................................... 5,941 5,941 5,941 5,941 147 0605712A SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING ............................................................... 55,504 55,504 55,504 55,504 148 0605716A ARMY EVALUATION CENTER ............................................................................. 65,274 65,274 65,274 65,274 149 0605718A ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG ............................ 1,283 1,283 1,283 1,283 150 0605801A PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................................................... 82,035 82,035 82,035 82,035 151 0605803A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES .............................................................. 33,853 33,853 38,853 33,853 

Internet mapping .................................................................................... [5,000 ] 

152 0605805A MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY ......................... 53,340 53,340 53,340 53,340 153 0605857A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT .............................. 5,193 5,193 5,193 5,193 154 0605898A MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................................................. 54,175 54,175 54,175 54,175 

SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ................................................ 1,159,610 1,159,610 1,164,610 1,159,610 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
830 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

156 0603778A MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ...................................................... 110,576 110,576 110,576 110,576 157 0607141A LOGISTICS AUTOMATION ................................................................................... 3,717 3,717 3,717 3,717 159 0607865A PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT ................................................................... 70,053 70,053 70,053 70,053 160 0102419A AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE ................................................................... 98,450 68,450 98,450 –15,000 83,450 

JLENS program reduction ........................................................................ [–30,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

161 0203726A ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM .............................................. 30,940 30,940 30,940 30,940 162 0203735A COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ................................................. 177,532 177,532 177,532 177,532 

163 0203740A MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM ......................................................................... 36,495 36,495 36,495 36,495 164 0203744A AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS .................... 257,187 257,187 277,171 14,061 271,248 

Transfer from APA 11 at Army request .................................................. [19,984 ] [14,061 ] 

165 0203752A AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................. 315 315 315 315 166 0203758A DIGITIZATION ..................................................................................................... 6,186 6,186 6,186 6,186 167 0203801A MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................ 1,578 1,578 1,578 1,578 168 0203802A OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS .................................... 62,100 62,100 62,100 62,100 169 0203808A TRACTOR CARD ................................................................................................ 18,778 18,778 18,778 18,778 170 0208053A JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM ................................................................... 7,108 7,108 7,108 7,108 173 0303028A SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600174 0303140A INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 9,357 9,357 9,357 9,357 175 0303141A GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 41,225 41,225 41,225 41,225 176 0303142A SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) ...................................................... 18,197 18,197 18,197 18,197177 0303150A WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................... 14,215 14,215 14,215 14,215 179 0305204A TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ......................................................... 33,533 33,533 33,533 33,533 180 0305208A DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 27,622 27,622 27,622 27,622 181 0305219A MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS ................................................................................ 10,901 10,901 10,901 10,901 182 0305232A RQ–11 UAV ....................................................................................................... 2,321 2,321 2,321 2,321 183 0305233A RQ–7 UAV ........................................................................................................ 12,031 12,031 12,031 12,031 185 0307665A BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE .............................................................. 12,449 12,449 12,449 12,449 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
831 

186 0708045A END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES ......................................... 56,136 56,136 56,136 56,136 

186A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 4,717 4,717 4,717 4,717 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 1,131,319 1,101,319 1,151,303 –939 1,130,380 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY ................... 7,989,102 7,942,102 8,018,680 –34,970 7,954,132 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601103N UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 112,617 122,617 112,617 112,617 

Program increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] 

002 0601152N IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ......................................... 18,230 18,230 18,230 18,230 003 0601153N DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 484,459 484,459 484,459 484,459 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 615,306 625,306 615,306 615,306 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602114N POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ........................................................ 104,513 104,513 104,513 104,513 

005 0602123N FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH ........................................................ 145,307 145,307 145,307 145,307 006 0602131M MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY ............................................... 47,334 47,334 47,334 47,334 007 0602235N COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH .......................................................... 34,163 34,163 34,163 34,163 008 0602236N WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH ............................................ 49,689 49,689 49,689 49,689 009 0602271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH ......................................... 97,701 97,701 97,701 97,701 010 0602435N OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH .............................. 45,685 63,685 45,685 15,000 60,685 

AGOR mid life refit ................................................................................. [18,000 ] [15,000 ] 

011 0602651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH ......................................... 6,060 6,060 6,060 6,060 012 0602747N UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ...................................................... 103,050 103,050 103,050 103,050 013 0602750N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH .......................................... 169,710 169,710 169,710 169,710 014 0602782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH ............................. 31,326 31,326 31,326 31,326 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 834,538 852,538 834,538 15,000 849,538 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

015 0603114N POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 48,201 48,201 48,201 48,201 016 0603123N FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................................ 28,328 28,328 28,328 28,328 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
832 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

019 0603271N ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ................................. 56,179 56,179 56,179 56,179 020 0603640M USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) ................................ 132,400 132,400 132,400 132,400 021 0603651M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................... 11,854 11,854 11,854 11,854 022 0603673N FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ......... 247,931 247,931 247,931 247,931 023 0603729N WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ...................................... 4,760 4,760 4,760 4,760 025 0603758N NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS ............................ 51,463 51,463 51,463 51,463 026 0603782N MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ..................... 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 583,116 583,116 583,116 583,116 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

027 0603207N AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS ................................................................ 42,246 42,246 42,246 42,246 028 0603216N AVIATION SURVIVABILITY .................................................................................. 5,591 5,591 5,591 5,591 029 0603237N DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL ................................................ 3,262 3,262 3,262 3,262 030 0603251N AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 74 74 74 74 031 0603254N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 7,964 7,964 7,964 7,964 032 0603261N TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE .......................................................... 5,257 5,257 5,257 5,257 033 0603382N ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY ................................................... 1,570 1,570 1,570 1,570 034 0603502N SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES ........................... 168,040 168,040 168,040 168,040 035 0603506N SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE .................................................................. 88,649 88,649 88,649 88,649 036 0603512N CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 83,902 83,902 83,902 83,902 

037 0603525N PILOT FISH ........................................................................................................ 108,713 108,713 108,713 108,713 038 0603527N RETRACT LARCH ............................................................................................... 9,316 9,316 9,316 9,316 039 0603536N RETRACT JUNIPER ............................................................................................ 77,108 77,108 77,108 77,108 040 0603542N RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL .................................................................................. 762 762 762 762 041 0603553N SURFACE ASW .................................................................................................. 2,349 2,349 2,349 2,349 042 0603561N ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 852,977 874,977 852,977 852,977 

Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Development ......................................... [22,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
833 

043 0603562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS ..................................................... 8,764 8,764 8,764 8,764 044 0603563N SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN .................................................................. 20,501 20,501 20,501 20,501 045 0603564N SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES ....................................... 27,052 27,052 27,052 27,052 046 0603570N ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ........................................................... 428,933 428,933 428,933 428,933 047 0603573N ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS .................................................... 27,154 27,154 27,154 –4,252 22,902 

Program execution .................................................................................. [–4,252 ] 

048 0603576N CHALK EAGLE ................................................................................................... 519,140 519,140 519,140 519,140 

049 0603581N LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) ......................................................................... 406,389 406,389 406,389 406,389 050 0603582N COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ....................................................................... 36,570 36,570 36,570 –18,040 18,530 

Late contract awards .............................................................................. [–18,040 ] 

051 0603609N CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS .............................................................................. 8,404 8,404 8,404 8,404 

052 0603611M MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES ................................................................ 136,967 136,967 136,967 –14,000 122,967 

Program delay ......................................................................................... [–14,000 ] 

053 0603635M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM ..................................... 1,489 1,489 1,489 1,489 054 0603654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 38,422 38,422 38,422 38,422 055 0603658N COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................ 69,312 69,312 69,312 –5,300 64,012 

Common array block antenna contract delay ........................................ [–5,300 ] 

056 0603713N OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 9,196 9,196 9,196 9,196 057 0603721N ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ......................................................................... 18,850 18,850 18,850 18,850 

058 0603724N NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM ................................................................................. 45,618 45,618 45,618 45,618 059 0603725N FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT ................................................................................ 3,019 3,019 3,019 3,019 060 0603734N CHALK CORAL ................................................................................................... 144,951 144,951 144,951 144,951 061 0603739N NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY ......................................................................... 5,797 5,797 5,797 5,797 062 0603746N RETRACT MAPLE ............................................................................................... 308,131 308,131 308,131 308,131 063 0603748N LINK PLUMERIA ................................................................................................. 195,189 195,189 195,189 195,189 064 0603751N RETRACT ELM ................................................................................................... 56,358 56,358 56,358 56,358 065 0603764N LINK EVERGREEN .............................................................................................. 55,378 55,378 55,378 55,378 066 0603787N SPECIAL PROCESSES ........................................................................................ 48,842 48,842 48,842 48,842 067 0603790N NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 7,509 7,509 7,509 7,509068 0603795N LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 5,075 5,075 5,075 –5,075 0 

Early to need ........................................................................................... [–5,075 ] 

069 0603851M JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING ............................................................ 51,178 51,178 51,178 51,178 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
834 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

070 0603860N JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL .................. 205,615 205,615 205,615 –10,896 194,719 

JPALS 1B follow-on platform integration delay ...................................... [–7,437 ] JPALS 1B test early to need ................................................................... [–3,459 ] 

072 0604272N TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) ........ 37,227 37,227 37,227 37,227 073 0604279N ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION ............................................................. 169 169 169 169 074 0604653N JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW) ... 20,874 10,874 20,874 –3,000 17,874 

Schedule delay ........................................................................................ [–10,000 ] [–3,000 ] 

075 0604659N PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ................................. 2,257 2,257 2,257 2,257 076 0604707N SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING 

SUPPORT.

38,327 38,327 38,327 38,327 

077 0604786N OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT ........................ 135,985 135,985 35,985 –30,000 105,985 

Adjust program to more realistic schedule ............................................ [–100,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

078 0605812M JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING 

DEVELOPMENT PH.

50,362 50,362 50,362 50,362 

079 0303354N ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP ............................................................... 8,448 8,448 8,448 –3,540 4,908 

Program delay ......................................................................................... [–3,540 ] 

080 0304270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP .................................................. 153 153 153 153 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 4,641,385 4,653,385 4,541,385 –94,103 4,547,282 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

081 0604212N OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 40,558 40,558 40,558 40,558 082 0604214N AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV ........................................................................... 35,825 35,825 35,825 –2,500 33,325 

Excess program management ................................................................ [–2,500 ] 

083 0604215N STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................. 99,891 99,891 99,891 99,891 

084 0604216N MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 17,565 17,565 17,565 17,565 085 0604218N AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING ............................................................. 4,026 4,026 4,026 4,026 086 0604221N P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ...................................................................... 1,791 1,791 1,791 1,791 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
835 

087 0604230N WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM ............................................................................ 11,725 11,725 11,725 11,725 088 0604231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM .......................................................................... 68,463 68,463 68,463 68,463 089 0604234N ADVANCED HAWKEYE ........................................................................................ 152,041 152,041 152,041 152,041 090 0604245N H–1 UPGRADES ................................................................................................ 47,123 47,123 47,123 47,123 091 0604261N ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS ........................................................................... 30,208 30,208 30,208 30,208 092 0604262N V–22A ............................................................................................................... 43,084 43,084 43,084 43,084 093 0604264N AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ................................................................ 11,401 11,401 11,401 11,401 094 0604269N EA–18 ............................................................................................................... 11,138 11,138 11,138 11,138 095 0604270N ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 34,964 34,964 34,964 34,964 096 0604273N VH–71A EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT ....................................................... 94,238 94,238 94,238 94,238 097 0604274N NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) ................................................................... 257,796 257,796 257,796 257,796 098 0604280N JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) ..................................... 3,302 3,302 3,302 3,302 099 0604307N SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING .................................. 240,298 240,298 240,298 240,298 100 0604311N LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION ........................................................... 1,214 1,214 1,214 1,214101 0604329N SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) ........................................................................ 46,007 46,007 46,007 46,007 102 0604366N STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................ 75,592 75,592 75,592 75,592 103 0604373N AIRBORNE MCM ................................................................................................ 117,854 117,854 117,854 117,854 104 0604376M MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) 

FOR AVIATION.

10,080 10,080 10,080 10,080 

105 0604378N NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 21,413 21,413 21,413 21,413 106 0604404N UNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE 

(UCLASS) SYSTEM.

146,683 146,683 146,683 –13,000 133,683 

Schedule delay ........................................................................................ [–13,000 ] 

107 0604501N ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS ............................................................... 275,871 275,871 275,871 –79,800 196,071 

Air and missile defense radar contract delay ....................................... [–79,800 ] 

108 0604503N SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 89,672 89,672 89,672 89,672 

109 0604504N AIR CONTROL ................................................................................................... 13,754 13,754 13,754 13,754 110 0604512N SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 69,615 69,615 69,615 69,615 112 0604558N NEW DESIGN SSN ............................................................................................. 121,566 121,566 121,566 121,566 113 0604562N SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM ....................................................... 49,143 49,143 49,143 49,143 114 0604567N SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E ........................................................ 155,254 155,254 175,254 20,000 175,254 

Increased LHA–8 design efforts ............................................................. [20,000 ] [20,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
836 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

115 0604574N NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES ......................................................... 3,689 3,689 3,689 3,689 116 0604601N MINE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................ 5,041 5,041 5,041 5,041 117 0604610N LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT ........................................................... 26,444 26,444 26,444 26,444 118 0604654N JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ................................... 8,897 8,897 8,897 8,897 119 0604703N PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS .......................... 6,233 6,233 6,233 6,233 120 0604727N JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS ................................................................ 442 442 442 442 121 0604755N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) ..................................................... 130,360 130,360 130,360 130,360 122 0604756N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) ..................................................... 50,209 50,209 50,209 50,209 123 0604757N SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) ................................................ 164,799 164,799 164,799 –50,000 114,799 

SEWIP block 3 program delay ................................................................ [–50,000 ] 

124 0604761N INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING ............................................................................ 1,984 1,984 1,984 1,984 

125 0604771N MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 9,458 9,458 9,458 9,458 126 0604777N NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM .................................................................................... 51,430 51,430 51,430 51,430 127 0604800M JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ................................................................. 512,631 512,631 512,631 –10,000 502,631 

F–35B follow-on development ahead of need ....................................... [–10,000 ] 

128 0604800N JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD ................................................................. 534,187 534,187 534,187 –10,000 524,187 

F–35B follow-on development ahead of need ....................................... [–10,000 ] 

129 0605013M INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 5,564 5,564 5,564 5,564 130 0605013N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 69,659 69,659 69,659 –6,836 62,823 

Unjustified request ................................................................................. [–6,836 ] 

132 0605212N CH–53K RDTE ................................................................................................... 503,180 503,180 503,180 503,180 

133 0605450N JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) ........................................................... 5,500 5,500 5,500 –5,500 0 

Program uncertainty ............................................................................... [–5,500 ] 

134 0605500N MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) ................................................... 317,358 317,358 317,358 –30,000 287,358 

P–8A spiral 2 development milestone B slip ........................................ [–30,000 ] 

135 0204202N DDG–1000 ........................................................................................................ 187,910 187,910 187,910 187,910 

136 0304231N TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP ................................................................ 2,140 2,140 2,140 2,140


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
837 

137 0304785N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS ................................................................... 9,406 9,406 9,406 9,406 138 0305124N SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM ................................................................... 22,800 22,800 22,800 22,800 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 5,028,476 5,028,476 5,048,476 –187,636 4,840,840 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

139 0604256N THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 43,261 43,261 43,261 43,261 140 0604258N TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 71,872 71,872 71,872 71,872 141 0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 38,033 38,033 38,033 38,033 142 0605126N JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION ............................ 1,352 1,352 1,352 1,352 143 0605152N STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY ...................................................... 5,566 5,566 5,566 5,566 144 0605154N CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ........................................................................ 48,345 48,345 48,345 48,345 146 0605804N TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES ............................................................... 637 637 637 637 147 0605853N MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ................................. 76,585 76,585 76,585 76,585 148 0605856N STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT ..................................................................... 3,221 3,221 3,221 3,221 149 0605861N RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT ......................................... 72,725 72,725 72,725 72,725 150 0605863N RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT ............................................................. 141,778 141,778 141,778 141,778 151 0605864N TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ..................................................................... 331,219 331,219 331,219 331,219 152 0605865N OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY .......................................... 16,565 16,565 16,565 16,565 153 0605866N NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT ............................ 3,265 3,265 3,265 3,265 154 0605867N SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT ........................................... 7,134 7,134 7,134 7,134 155 0605873M MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT ...................................................... 24,082 24,082 24,082 24,082156 0305885N TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 497 497 497 497 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............................................................ 886,137 886,137 886,137 886,137 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

159 0604227N HARPOON MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................ 699 699 699 699 

160 0604402N UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND 

PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT.

20,961 40,961 20,961 20,961 

X–47B Aerial Refueling Test & Evaluation ............................................ [20,000 ] 

162 0604766M MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS ....................................................................... 35 35 35 35 163 0605525N CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON .......................................... 2,460 2,460 2,460 2,460 164 0605555N STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................... 9,757 9,757 9,757 9,757 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
838 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

165 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT ............................................. 98,057 121,957 98,057 98,057 

Reentry System Applications and Strategic Guidance Applications ...... [23,900 ] 

166 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ........................................................ 31,768 31,768 31,768 31,768 167 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................ 1,464 1,464 1,464 1,464 168 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................... 21,729 21,729 21,729 21,729 169 0203761N RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) ........................................................... 13,561 13,561 13,561 13,561 170 0204136N F/A–18 SQUADRONS ......................................................................................... 131,118 131,118 131,118 131,118 171 0204152N E–2 SQUADRONS .............................................................................................. 1,971 1,971 1,971 1,971 172 0204163N FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) ....................................................... 46,155 46,155 46,155 –11,732 34,423 

Joint Aerial Layer Network program delay .............................................. [–11,732 ] 

173 0204228N SURFACE SUPPORT ........................................................................................... 2,374 2,374 2,374 2,374 

174 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) ................. 12,407 12,407 12,407 12,407 175 0204311N INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .............................................................. 41,609 41,609 41,609 41,609 

176 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) ................... 7,240 7,240 7,240 7,240 177 0204460M GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) .............................................. 78,208 78,208 78,208 78,208 178 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 45,124 45,124 45,124 45,124 179 0204574N CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT ...................................................................... 2,703 2,703 2,703 2,703 180 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT ......................................... 19,563 19,563 19,563 19,563 181 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT ....................................................................................... 13,586 13,586 13,586 13,586 182 0205604N TACTICAL DATA LINKS ...................................................................................... 197,538 197,538 197,538 197,538 183 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION ............................................... 31,863 31,863 31,863 31,863 184 0205632N MK–48 ADCAP .................................................................................................. 12,806 12,806 12,806 12,806 185 0205633N AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................ 88,607 88,607 88,607 88,607 187 0205675N OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS ...................................................... 116,928 116,928 116,928 116,928 188 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS .................................................. 178,753 178,753 178,753 178,753 189 0206623M MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS ................... 139,594 113,794 118,719 –20,875 118,719 

Marine Personnel Carrier program deferred ........................................... [–20,800 ] [–20,875 ] [–20,875 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
839 

Precision extended range munition program reduction ......................... [–5,000 ] 

190 0206624M MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT ................................................. 42,647 42,647 42,647 –5,613 37,034 

Prior year carry over ............................................................................... [–5,613 ] 

191 0206625M USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) ......................... 34,394 34,394 34,394 34,394 192 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................................................... 39,159 39,159 39,159 –8,000 31,159 

Program delay ......................................................................................... [–8,000 ] 

193 0207163N ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .......................... 2,613 2,613 2,613 2,613 194 0208058N JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL (JHSV) ................................................................... 986 986 986 986 199 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) ............................................................ 66,231 66,231 66,231 66,231 

200 0303138N CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) ............... 24,476 24,476 24,476 24,476 201 0303140N INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 23,531 23,531 23,531 23,531 206 0305160N NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC) ................... 742 742 742 742 207 0305192N MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES ..................................... 4,804 4,804 4,804 4,804 208 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ......................................................... 8,381 8,381 8,381 8,381 211 0305208M DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 5,535 5,535 5,535 5,535 212 0305208N DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 19,718 19,718 19,718 19,718 213 0305220N RQ–4 UAV ......................................................................................................... 375,235 375,235 375,235 375,235 214 0305231N MQ–8 UAV ........................................................................................................ 48,713 48,713 48,713 48,713 215 0305232M RQ–11 UAV ....................................................................................................... 102 102 102 102 216 0305233N RQ–7 UAV ......................................................................................................... 710 710 710 710 217 0305234N SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) .................................................... 5,013 5,013 5,013 5,013 219 0305239M RQ–21A ............................................................................................................ 11,122 11,122 11,122 11,122 220 0305241N MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................. 28,851 28,851 28,851 28,851 221 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT ............................................................ 5,116 5,116 5,116 5,116222 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) ........................................................................ 28,042 28,042 28,042 28,042 223 0708011N INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................ 50,933 50,933 50,933 50,933 224 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) ............................................................... 4,998 4,998 4,998 4,998 

224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 1,185,132 1,185,132 1,185,132 1,185,132 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 3,385,822 3,403,922 3,364,947 –46,220 3,339,602 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY .................... 15,974,780 16,032,880 15,873,905 –312,959 15,661,821 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
840 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601102F DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 373,151 373,151 373,151 373,151 

002 0601103F UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES ................................................................. 138,333 138,333 138,333 138,333 003 0601108F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES .................................................. 13,286 13,286 13,286 13,286 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 524,770 524,770 524,770 524,770 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

004 0602102F MATERIALS ........................................................................................................ 116,846 116,846 116,846 116,846 005 0602201F AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES .............................................................. 119,672 119,672 119,672 119,672 

006 0602202F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH .................................................. 89,483 89,483 89,483 89,483 007 0602203F AEROSPACE PROPULSION ................................................................................. 197,546 197,546 197,546 197,546 008 0602204F AEROSPACE SENSORS ...................................................................................... 127,539 127,539 127,539 127,539 009 0602601F SPACE TECHNOLOGY ........................................................................................ 104,063 104,063 104,063 104,063 010 0602602F CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS .............................................................................. 81,521 81,521 81,521 81,521 011 0602605F DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY .................................................................... 112,845 112,845 112,845 112,845 012 0602788F DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS ....................................... 138,161 138,161 138,161 138,161 013 0602890F HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH ..................................................................... 40,217 40,217 40,217 40,217 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 1,127,893 1,127,893 1,127,893 1,127,893 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

014 0603112F ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS .............................................. 39,572 49,572 39,572 10,000 49,572 

Program increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] [10,000 ] 

015 0603199F SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) ........................................... 12,800 12,800 12,800 12,800 016 0603203F ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS ................................................................... 30,579 30,579 30,579 30,579 

017 0603211F AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO ............................................................. 77,347 77,347 77,347 77,347 018 0603216F AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY ..................................... 149,321 149,321 149,321 149,321 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
841 

019 0603270F ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY ................................................................ 49,128 49,128 49,128 49,128 020 0603401F ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY ............................................................ 68,071 68,071 68,071 68,071 021 0603444F MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) ................................................. 26,299 26,299 26,299 26,299 022 0603456F HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................. 20,967 20,967 20,967 20,967 023 0603601F CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY .......................................................... 33,996 33,996 33,996 33,996 024 0603605F ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY ................................................................. 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 025 0603680F MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ...................................................... 41,353 41,353 41,353 41,353 026 0603788F BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ................. 49,093 49,093 49,093 49,093 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 617,526 627,526 617,526 10,000 627,526 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES 

028 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................ 3,983 3,983 3,983 3,983 029 0603287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 3,874 3,874 3,874 3,874 

032 0603438F SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY ........................................................................ 27,024 27,024 27,024 27,024 033 0603742F COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY ........................................................... 15,899 15,899 15,899 15,899 034 0603790F NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .............................................................. 4,568 4,568 4,568 4,568035 0603791F INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D ..................................................... 379 379 379 379 036 0603830F SPACE PROTECTION PROGRAM (SPP) .............................................................. 28,764 28,764 28,764 28,764 038 0603851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL ........................................ 86,737 86,737 86,737 86,737 040 0603859F POLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL ................................................................ 953 953 953 953 042 0604015F LONG RANGE STRIKE ........................................................................................ 379,437 379,437 379,437 379,437 044 0604317F TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER .................................................................................. 2,606 2,606 2,606 2,606 045 0604327F HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM .. 103 103 103 103 047 0604337F REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION .................................................. 16,018 16,018 16,018 16,018 049 0604458F AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER .............................................................................. 58,861 58,861 58,861 58,861 050 0604618F JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION ..................................................................... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 051 0604635F GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 21,175 21,175 21,175 21,175 052 0604857F OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE ............................................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 

Program increase .................................................................................... [10,000 ] [10,000 ] 

053 0604858F TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM ........................................................................... 13,636 13,636 13,636 13,636 054 0105921F SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES .................................. 2,799 2,799 2,799 2,799 055 0207455F THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) ..................................... 70,160 70,160 70,160 70,160 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
842 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

056 0305164F NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) ........... 137,233 137,233 137,233 137,233 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES ......... 876,709 876,709 886,709 10,000 886,709 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

058 0603260F INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................ 977 977 977 977 061 0604233F SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING ........................................... 3,601 3,601 3,601 3,601 062 0604270F ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 1,971 1,971 1,971 1,971 064 0604281F TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE ......................................................... 51,456 51,456 36,256 51,456 

Unjustified request ................................................................................. [–15,200 ] 

065 0604287F PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT ..................................................................... 50 50 50 50 066 0604329F SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD ............................................................ 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 

067 0604421F COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS ................................................................................ 23,930 23,930 23,930 23,930 068 0604425F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS ........................................................ 400,258 400,258 400,258 400,258 069 0604429F AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK ...................................................................... 4,575 4,575 4,575 4,575 070 0604441F SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD .................................... 352,532 372,532 352,532 –29,700 322,832 

Modernization projects execution delays excluding exploitation efforts [–29,700 ] Space Based Infrared Systems (SBIRS) Data Exploitation .................... [20,000 ] 

071 0604602F ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 16,284 16,284 16,284 16,284 

072 0604604F SUBMUNITIONS ................................................................................................. 2,564 2,564 2,564 2,564 073 0604617F AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT ................................................................................. 17,036 17,036 17,036 17,036 074 0604706F LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS .................................................................................. 7,273 7,273 7,273 7,273 075 0604735F COMBAT TRAINING RANGES ............................................................................. 33,200 33,200 33,200 33,200 078 0604800F F–35—EMD ...................................................................................................... 816,335 816,335 816,335 816,335 079 0604851F INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—EMD ............................................... 145,442 145,442 145,442 145,442 080 0604853F EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD ............. 27,963 27,963 27,963 27,963 081 0604932F LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON .................................................................... 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 082 0604933F ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION ............................................................................ 129,411 129,411 129,411 129,411 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
843 

083 0605213F F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B ......................................................... 131,100 131,100 131,100 131,100 084 0605221F KC–46 ............................................................................................................... 1,558,590 1,558,590 1,558,590 1,558,590 085 0605229F CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION ..................................................................... 393,558 393,558 393,558 –60,000 333,558 

Program delays / projected savings pending updated program estimate. [–60,000 ] 

086 0605278F HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E .............................................................................. 6,242 6,242 6,242 6,242 087 0605431F ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) .............................................................. 272,872 272,872 272,872 272,872 088 0605432F POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) ............................................................................ 124,805 124,805 124,805 124,805 089 0605433F WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) .............................................................. 13,948 13,948 13,948 13,948 

090 0605931F B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .......................................................... 303,500 303,500 303,500 303,500 091 0101125F NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION .............................................................. 67,874 67,874 67,874 67,874 094 0207701F FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING .................................................................... 4,663 4,663 4,663 4,663 097 0401318F CV–22 ............................................................................................................... 46,705 46,705 46,705 46,705 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ............................. 5,078,715 5,098,715 5,063,515 –89,700 4,989,015 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

099 0604256F THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 17,690 17,690 17,690 17,690 

100 0604759F MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT ................................................................................. 34,841 34,841 34,841 34,841 101 0605101F RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE .............................................................................. 32,956 32,956 32,956 32,956 103 0605712F INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION ..................................................... 13,610 13,610 13,610 13,610 104 0605807F TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ..................................................................... 742,658 742,658 742,658 742,658 105 0605860F ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) ............................................... 14,203 14,203 14,203 14,203 106 0605864F SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) ........................................................................... 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 107 0605976F FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION 

SUPPORT.

44,160 44,160 44,160 44,160 

108 0605978F FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT ........................ 27,643 27,643 27,643 27,643 109 0606323F MULTI-SERVICE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING INITIATIVE ........................................ 13,935 13,935 13,935 13,935 110 0606392F SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE ............................ 192,348 192,348 192,348 192,348 111 0702806F ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ..................................................... 28,647 28,647 28,647 28,647112 0804731F GENERAL SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................ 315 315 315 315 114 1001004F INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES .............................................................................. 3,785 3,785 3,785 3,785 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............................................................ 1,179,791 1,179,791 1,179,791 1,179,791 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
844 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

115 0603423F GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT .......... 383,500 383,500 383,500 383,500 117 0604445F WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE .............................................................................. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 

118 0605018F AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) .............................. 90,097 90,097 90,097 90,097 119 0605024F ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY ............................................ 32,086 32,086 32,086 32,086 121 0101113F B–52 SQUADRONS ........................................................................................... 24,007 24,007 24,007 24,007 122 0101122F AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) ......................................................... 450 450 450 450 123 0101126F B–1B SQUADRONS ........................................................................................... 19,589 19,589 19,589 19,589 124 0101127F B–2 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................. 100,194 100,194 100,194 100,194 125 0101313F STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM .............................................. 37,448 37,448 37,448 37,448 128 0102326F REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,700 130 0203761F WARFIGHTER RAPID ACQUISITION PROCESS (WRAP) RAPID TRANSITION 

FUND.

3,844 3,844 3,844 3,844 

131 0205219F MQ–9 UAV ........................................................................................................ 128,328 128,328 128,328 128,328 133 0207131F A–10 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 9,614 9,614 9,614 9,614 134 0207133F F–16 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 177,298 177,298 177,298 177,298 135 0207134F F–15E SQUADRONS .......................................................................................... 244,289 244,289 244,289 244,289 136 0207136F MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION ............................................................. 13,138 13,138 13,138 13,138 137 0207138F F–22A SQUADRONS .......................................................................................... 328,542 328,542 328,542 328,542 138 0207142F F–35 SQUADRONS ............................................................................................ 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 139 0207161F TACTICAL AIM MISSILES ................................................................................... 15,460 15,460 15,460 15,460 140 0207163F ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) .......................... 84,172 84,172 84,172 84,172 142 0207224F COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY ................................................................... 2,582 2,582 2,582 2,582 143 0207227F COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE .................................................................... 542 542 542 542 144 0207247F AF TENCAP ....................................................................................................... 89,816 89,816 13,016 89,816 

Reduction fighter communications POD ................................................. [–76,800 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
845 

145 0207249F PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT ................................................. 1,075 1,075 1,075 1,075 146 0207253F COMPASS CALL ................................................................................................ 10,782 10,782 10,782 10,782 147 0207268F AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ............................. 139,369 139,369 139,369 139,369 149 0207325F JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) ....................................... 6,373 6,373 6,373 6,373 150 0207410F AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) ...................................................... 22,820 22,820 22,820 22,820 151 0207412F CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) ...................................................... 7,029 7,029 7,029 7,029 152 0207417F AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) ................................... 186,256 186,256 186,256 186,256 153 0207418F TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS ........................................................ 743 743 743 743 156 0207431F COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES ............................................. 4,471 4,471 4,471 4,471 158 0207444F TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD ............................................................... 10,250 10,250 10,250 10,250 159 0207448F C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK ............................................................................. 1,431 1,431 1,431 1,431 160 0207449F COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) CONSTELLATION ............................................. 7,329 7,329 7,329 7,329 161 0207452F DCAPES ............................................................................................................. 15,081 15,081 15,081 15,081 162 0207581F JOINT SURVEILLANCE/TARGET ATTACK RADAR SYSTEM (JSTARS) ................... 13,248 13,248 23,148 9,900 23,148 

Continue T–3 testing operations ............................................................ [9,900 ] [9,900 ] 

163 0207590F SEEK EAGLE ...................................................................................................... 24,342 24,342 24,342 24,342 164 0207601F USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION .................................................................. 10,448 10,448 10,448 10,448 165 0207605F WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS ......................................................... 5,512 5,512 5,512 5,512 166 0207697F DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES ......................................................... 3,301 3,301 3,301 3,301167 0208006F MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 62,605 62,605 62,605 62,605 169 0208059F CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES .......................................................................... 68,099 68,099 68,099 68,099 170 0208087F AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ....................................................... 14,047 14,047 14,047 14,047 171 0208088F AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS ....................................................... 5,853 5,853 5,853 5,853 179 0301400F SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE ................................................................. 12,197 12,197 12,197 12,197 180 0302015F E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) .............................. 18,267 18,267 18,267 18,267 181 0303131F MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) .... 36,288 36,288 36,288 36,288 182 0303140F INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 90,231 90,231 100,231 10,000 100,231 

ASACoE program ..................................................................................... [10,000 ] [10,000 ] 

183 0303141F GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 725 725 725 725 185 0303601F MILSATCOM TERMINALS ................................................................................... 140,170 140,170 140,170 140,170 

187 0304260F AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE ........................................................................ 117,110 117,110 117,110 117,110 190 0305099F GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) ................................................... 4,430 4,430 4,430 4,430 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
846 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

191 0305103F CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 2,048 2,048 2,048 2,048 192 0305105F DOD CYBER CRIME CENTER ............................................................................ 288 288 288 288 193 0305110F SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) .......................................................... 35,698 35,698 35,698 35,698 194 0305111F WEATHER SERVICE ........................................................................................... 24,667 24,667 24,667 24,667 195 0305114F AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) ............ 35,674 35,674 35,674 35,674 196 0305116F AERIAL TARGETS .............................................................................................. 21,186 21,186 21,186 21,186 199 0305128F SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 195 195 195 195 200 0305145F ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................... 1,430 1,430 1,430 1,430 201 0305146F DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES ........................................ 330 330 330 330 206 0305173F SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER ..................................... 3,696 3,696 3,696 3,696 207 0305174F SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 2,469 2,469 2,469 2,469 208 0305179F INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) ......................................................... 8,289 8,289 8,289 8,289209 0305182F SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) ................................................................ 13,345 13,345 13,345 13,345 211 0305202F DRAGON U–2 .................................................................................................... 18,700 18,700 18,700 18,700 212 0305205F ENDURANCE UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES ..................................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 213 0305206F AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS .......................................................... 37,828 37,828 50,328 12,500 50,328 

Blue Devil Replacement WAMI/NVDF ...................................................... [15,000 ] [12,500 ] Unjustified amount ................................................................................. [–2,500 ] 

214 0305207F MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS ............................................................. 13,491 13,491 13,491 13,491 

215 0305208F DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 7,498 7,498 7,498 7,498 216 0305219F MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV .................................................................................. 3,326 3,326 3,326 3,326 217 0305220F RQ–4 UAV ........................................................................................................ 134,406 134,406 134,406 –20,000 114,406 

Multiple execution delays ....................................................................... [–20,000 ] 

218 0305221F NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING ............................................ 7,413 7,413 7,413 7,413 219 0305236F COMMON DATA LINK (CDL) .............................................................................. 40,503 40,503 40,503 40,503 220 0305238F NATO AGS ......................................................................................................... 264,134 264,134 264,134 264,134 221 0305240F SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE ...................................................................... 23,016 23,016 23,016 23,016 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
847 

222 0305265F GPS III SPACE SEGMENT .................................................................................. 221,276 221,276 221,276 221,276 223 0305614F JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM .................................................................................. 58,523 58,523 58,523 58,523 224 0305881F RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION .............................................................................. 2,218 2,218 2,218 2,218 226 0305913F NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) ............................................................... 50,547 50,547 50,547 50,547 227 0305940F SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS ................................................... 18,807 18,807 18,807 18,807229 0308699F SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) ...................................................................... 1,079 1,079 1,079 1,079 230 0401115F C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON .............................................................................. 400 26,400 400 73,300 73,700 

C–130 AMP ............................................................................................. [47,300 ] C–130H Propulsion System Propeller Upgrades ..................................... [26,000 ] [26,000 ] 

231 0401119F C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) .......................................................................... 61,492 61,492 61,492 61,492 

232 0401130F C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) ......................................................................................... 109,134 109,134 109,134 109,134 233 0401132F C–130J PROGRAM ............................................................................................ 22,443 22,443 22,443 22,443 234 0401134F LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) ....................................... 4,116 4,116 4,116 4,116 238 0401314F OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT ...................................................................... 44,553 44,553 44,553 44,553 239 0408011F SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL ............................................................ 6,213 6,213 6,213 6,213 

240 0702207F DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) ........................................................................ 1,605 1,605 1,605 1,605 242 0708610F LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) .............................................. 95,238 95,238 95,238 95,238 243 0708611F SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 10,925 10,925 10,925 10,925 244 0804743F OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING .................................................................................. 1,347 1,347 1,347 1,347 245 0808716F OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 65 65 65 65 246 0901202F JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY ........................................................... 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 247 0901218F CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM ................................................................ 1,577 1,577 1,577 1,577 248 0901220F PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................... 5,990 5,990 5,990 5,990 249 0901226F AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY .................................................. 786 786 786 786 250 0901279F FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE ....................................................... 654 654 654 654 251 0901538F FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................. 135,735 135,735 135,735 135,735 

252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 11,874,528 11,894,528 11,874,528 11,874,528 

Increase to classified program ............................................................... [70,000 ] Program Increase .................................................................................... [20,000 ] Reduction to classified program ............................................................ [–70,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................... 16,297,542 16,343,542 16,253,142 85,700 16,383,242 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
848 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF ........................ 25,702,946 25,778,946 25,653,346 16,000 25,718,946 

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW BASIC RESEARCH 

001 0601000BR DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE .................................................................. 45,837 45,837 45,837 45,837 

002 0601101E DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES ....................................................................... 315,033 315,033 315,033 315,033 003 0601110D8Z BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES .......................................................................... 11,171 11,171 11,171 11,171 004 0601117E BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE ....................................... 49,500 49,500 49,500 49,500 005 0601120D8Z NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM ..................................................... 84,271 89,271 84,271 84,271 

Restore PK–12 funding ........................................................................... [5,000 ] 

006 0601228D8Z HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS 30,895 35,895 30,895 5,000 35,895 

Program increase .................................................................................... [5,000 ] [5,000 ] 

007 0601384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 51,426 51,426 51,426 51,426 

SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH ....................................................................... 588,133 598,133 588,133 5,000 593,133 

APPLIED RESEARCH 

008 0602000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 20,065 13,565 20,065 20,065 

Decrease to insensitive munitions program ........................................... [–6,500 ] 

009 0602115E BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................... 114,790 114,790 114,790 114,790 

011 0602234D8Z LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM ................................................. 46,875 46,875 41,875 –5,000 41,875 

MIT LL reduction ..................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

013 0602251D8Z APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES ................. 45,000 45,000 30,000 –5,000 40,000 

PSC S&T reduction .................................................................................. [–15,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

014 0602303E INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY .......................................... 413,260 413,260 418,260 2,500 415,760 

Plan X increase ....................................................................................... [5,000 ] [2,500 ] 

015 0602304E COGNITIVE COMPUTING SYSTEMS .................................................................... 16,330 16,330 16,330 16,330 

017 0602383E BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE ...................................................................... 24,537 24,537 24,537 24,537 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
849 

018 0602384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 227,065 217,065 227,065 –10,000 217,065 

Program decrease ................................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

020 0602668D8Z CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH ........................................................................... 18,908 18,908 18,908 18,908 

Assuring effective missions .................................................................... [–2,000 ] Automated software analysis tools ........................................................ [2,000 ] 

021 0602670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) APPLIED RESEARCH. 5,000 2,500 2,500 

HSCB Apl Res extension ......................................................................... [5,000 ] [2,500 ] 

022 0602702E TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY .................................................................................... 225,977 225,977 225,977 225,977 

023 0602715E MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY ..................................................... 166,654 166,654 166,654 166,654 024 0602716E ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................. 243,469 243,469 243,469 243,469 025 0602718BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES ............................ 175,282 175,282 175,282 175,282 026 0602751D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH ...................... 11,107 11,107 11,107 11,107 027 1160401BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 29,246 29,246 29,246 29,246 

SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH ................................................................... 1,778,565 1,762,065 1,768,565 –15,000 1,763,565 

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 

028 0603000D8Z JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................... 26,646 26,646 26,646 –5,000 21,646 

Program decrease ................................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

029 0603121D8Z SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................... 19,420 19,920 19,420 19,420 

Program increase for future information operations strategy ............... [500 ] 

030 0603122D8Z COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT ............................................ 77,792 77,792 60,792 77,792 

Reduction due to redundancy ................................................................. [–17,000 ] 

031 0603160BR COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND 

DEFEAT.

274,033 274,033 274,033 274,033 

032 0603175C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ..................................................... 309,203 239,203 279,203 –95,000 214,203 

Advanced Technology—unsustainable growth ....................................... [–25,000 ] [–20,000 ] Common Kill VehicleTechnology—transfer to line 032X ....................... [–70,000 ] [–70,000 ] Directed energy—DPALS ......................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

032X 0603XXXC COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 70,000 100,000 100,000

Common Kill Vehicle Technology—transfer from line 032 .................... [70,000 ] [70,000 ] Increase for CKVT design and development .......................................... [30,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
850 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

034 0603225D8Z JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .............................. 19,305 19,305 19,305 19,305 035 0603264S AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY. 7,565 7,565 7,565 7,565 036 0603274C SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY ......................................................... 40,426 40,426 40,426 40,426037 0603286E ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS .................................................................... 149,804 149,804 149,804 149,804 038 0603287E SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY ............................................................. 172,546 172,546 172,546 172,546 039 0603384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT. 170,847 170,847 170,847 170,847 040 0603618D8Z JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 9,009 9,009 9,009 9,009 041 0603648D8Z JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ........................................ 174,428 167,428 164,428 –7,000 167,428 

Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts .................................. [–7,000 ] [–10,000 ] [–7,000 ] 

042 0603662D8Z NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES ................................................ 20,000 20,000 5,000 –15,000 5,000 

Net Comm reduction ............................................................................... [–15,000 ] [–15,000 ] 

045 0603668D8Z CYBER SECURITY ADVANCED RESEARCH ........................................................ 19,668 19,668 19,668 19,668 

Assuring effective missions .................................................................... [–3,000 ] Automated software analysis tools ........................................................ [3,000 ] 

046 0603670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) ADVANCED 

DEVELOPMENT.

5,000 2,500 2,500 

HSCB Adv Dev extension ........................................................................ [5,000 ] [2,500 ] 

047 0603680D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ...... 34,041 34,041 59,041 25,000 59,041 

IBIF .......................................................................................................... [25,000 ] [25,000 ] 

048 0603699D8Z EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 61,971 53,971 61,971 –8,000 53,971 

Decrease to Strategic Capabilities Office efforts .................................. [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] 

050 0603712S GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS ............................ 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 051 0603713S DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY ......................... 30,256 30,256 30,256 30,256 052 0603716D8Z STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM ........................................ 72,324 72,324 72,324 72,324 053 0603720S MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT .................. 82,700 82,700 82,700 82,700 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
851 

054 0603727D8Z JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM ........................................................................ 8,431 8,431 8,431 8,431 055 0603739E ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES ....................................................... 117,080 117,080 117,080 117,080 057 0603760E COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ................................. 239,078 239,078 239,078 239,078 059 0603766E NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY ................................................... 259,006 259,006 259,006 259,006 060 0603767E SENSOR TECHNOLOGY ...................................................................................... 286,364 286,364 286,364 286,364 061 0603769SE DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................. 12,116 12,116 12,116 12,116 062 0603781D8Z SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE ................................................................ 19,008 19,008 19,008 19,008 063 0603826D8Z QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS .............................................................. 78,532 78,532 58,532 –10,000 68,532 

Quick & Rapid Reaction Fund reduction ................................................ [–20,000 ] [–10,000 ] 

065 0603828J JOINT EXPERIMENTATION .................................................................................. 12,667 12,667 12,667 12,667 

066 0603832D8Z DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE ................................ 41,370 41,370 41,370 41,370 069 0603941D8Z TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ............................................... 92,508 92,508 92,508 92,508070 0604055D8Z OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT ......................................... 52,001 60,001 52,001 52,001 

Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund ................................. [8,000 ] 

071 0303310D8Z CWMD SYSTEMS ............................................................................................... 52,053 52,053 55,053 3,000 55,053 

Program increase .................................................................................... [3,000 ] [3,000 ] 

072 1160402BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ..................... 46,809 46,809 46,809 46,809 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ................................... 3,109,007 3,102,507 3,050,007 –9,500 3,099,507 

ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES 

075 0603161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E 

ADC&P.

63,641 63,641 63,641 63,641 

076 0603527D8Z RETRACT LARCH ............................................................................................... 19,152 19,152 19,152 19,152 077 0603600D8Z WALKOFF ........................................................................................................... 70,763 70,763 70,763 70,763 079 0603714D8Z ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM ................................................. 17,230 17,230 19,230 2,000 19,230 

Sustain testing effort ............................................................................. [2,000 ] [2,000 ] 

080 0603851D8Z ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ................ 71,453 71,453 71,453 71,453 081 0603881C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT .......................... 268,990 268,990 268,990 268,990 082 0603882C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT ....................... 1,033,903 1,174,303 1,033,903 100,000 1,133,903 

Continue activities relative to site evaluation, EIS, and planning ....... [20,400 ] [20,000 ] FTG-07 failure review board and return to flight .................................. [80,000 ] Planning and Design (35% to 100% design) ....................................... [50,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
852 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

RDT&E Ground Systems Development .................................................... [70,000 ] 

083 0603884BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL ......................... 196,237 196,237 196,237 196,237 084 0603884C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS ........................................................... 315,183 315,183 345,183 80,000 395,183 

Additional homeland missile defense radar .......................................... [30,000 ] [30,000 ] Enhanced discrimination capability ....................................................... [50,000 ] 

086 0603890C BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS ............................................................................. 377,605 377,605 377,605 377,605 

087 0603891C SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA ............................................................................. 286,613 286,613 286,613 286,613 088 0603892C AEGIS BMD ....................................................................................................... 937,056 937,056 937,056 937,056 089 0603893C SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM .................................................. 44,947 44,947 44,947 44,947 090 0603895C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS .............................. 6,515 6,515 6,515 6,515 091 0603896C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI. 418,355 418,355 418,355 418,355 

092 0603898C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT ............................ 47,419 47,419 47,419 47,419 093 0603904C MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) ................. 52,131 52,131 52,131 52,131 094 0603906C REGARDING TRENCH ........................................................................................ 13,864 13,864 13,864 13,864 

095 0603907C SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) ................................................................... 44,478 44,478 44,478 44,478 096 0603913C ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS .................................................................. 95,782 283,782 245,782 188,000 283,782 

Arrow Weapon System Improvements ..................................................... [30,000 ] [33,700 ] Arrow–3 Interceptor ................................................................................ [20,000 ] [22,100 ] David’s Sling short-range BMD .............................................................. [100,000 ] [117,200 ] Increase Israeli Cooperative Programs ................................................... [173,000 ] US co-production capability for Iron Dome parts and components ...... [15,000 ] [15,000 ] 

097 0603914C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST .................................................................. 375,866 375,866 375,866 375,866 

098 0603915C BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS ............................................................ 495,257 495,257 495,257 495,257 099 0603920D8Z HUMANITARIAN DEMINING ................................................................................ 11,704 11,704 11,704 11,704 100 0603923D8Z COALITION WARFARE ........................................................................................ 9,842 9,842 9,842 9,842 101 0604016D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM ......................................... 3,312 13,312 3,312 10,000 13,312


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
853 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ....................................... [10,000 ] [10,000 ] 

102 0604250D8Z ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES .......................................................... 130,000 25,000 100,000 –30,000 100,000 

Decrease to SCO efforts ......................................................................... [–105,000 ] [–30,000 ] [–30,000 ] 

103 0604400D8Z DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) 

COMMON DEVELOPMENT.

8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300 

104 0604445J WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE .............................................................................. 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 105 0604670D8Z HUMAN, SOCIAL AND CULTURE BEHAVIOR MODELING (HSCB) RESEARCH 

AND ENGINEERING.

5,000 2,500 2,500 

HSCB Modeling R&E extension ............................................................... [5,000 ] [2,500 ] 

106 0604775D8Z DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM .......................................................... 250,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 

Rapid Innovation Program ...................................................................... [250,000 ] [150,000 ] [200,000 ] 

108 0604787J JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION .......................................................................... 7,402 7,402 7,402 7,402 

110 0604828J JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM ............................... 7,506 7,506 7,506 7,506 111 0604880C LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) ........................................................................... 129,374 129,374 129,374 129,374 112 0604881C AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 308,522 308,522 308,522 308,522 115 0303191D8Z JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM ................................ 3,169 3,169 3,169 3,169 116 0305103C CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 946 946 946 946 

SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES ..... 5,902,517 6,385,917 6,209,517 552,500 6,455,017 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION 

118 0604161D8Z NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD 8,155 8,155 8,155 8,155 119 0604165D8Z PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 65,440 65,440 65,440 65,440 120 0604384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD ................................ 451,306 451,306 451,306 451,306 122 0604764K ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO) ......................... 29,138 29,138 29,138 29,138 123 0604771D8Z JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) ....................... 19,475 19,475 19,475 19,475 124 0605000BR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES ............................... 12,901 12,901 12,901 12,901 125 0605013BL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 13,812 13,812 13,812 13,812126 0605021SE HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE ................................................. 386 386 386 386 127 0605022D8Z DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM ................................................................ 3,763 3,763 3,763 3,763 128 0605027D8Z OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES ........................................................... 6,788 6,788 6,788 6,788 129 0605070S DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ................ 27,917 27,917 27,917 27,917 130 0605075D8Z DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION .................................................................... 22,297 22,297 22,297 22,297 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
854 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

131 0605080S DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM .............................. 51,689 51,689 51,689 51,689 132 0605210D8Z DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES ............................ 6,184 6,184 6,184 6,184 133 0303141K GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM ................................................................ 12,083 12,083 12,083 12,083 134 0305304D8Z DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) ..................... 3,302 3,302 3,302 3,302 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION ......................... 734,636 734,636 734,636 734,636 

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

135 0604774D8Z DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) ......................................... 6,393 6,393 6,393 6,393 136 0604875D8Z JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT .............................................. 2,479 2,479 2,479 2,479 137 0604940D8Z CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) .......... 240,213 240,213 240,213 240,213 138 0604942D8Z ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS ................................................................... 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 

139 0604943D8Z THERMAL VICAR ............................................................................................... 8,287 8,287 8,287 8,287 140 0605100D8Z JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) ............................... 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 141 0605104D8Z TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS ............................................... 24,379 24,379 24,379 24,379 143 0605117D8Z FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION ..................................... 54,311 54,311 54,311 54,311 144 0605126J JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) ....... 47,462 47,462 47,462 47,462 146 0605130D8Z FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING ..................................................................... 12,134 12,134 12,134 12,134 147 0605142D8Z SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ................................................................................... 44,237 44,237 39,237 44,237 

SE transfer to DT&E ............................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

148 0605151D8Z STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD ........................................................ 5,871 5,871 5,871 5,871 149 0605161D8Z NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY ........................................................ 5,028 5,028 5,028 5,028

150 0605170D8Z SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION ............................. 6,301 6,301 6,301 6,301 151 0605200D8Z GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) ................................................... 6,504 6,504 6,504 6,504 152 0605384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ........................................... 92,046 92,046 92,046 92,046 158 0605790D8Z SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (S. 1,868 1,868 1,868 1,868 

159 0605798D8Z DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS .................................................................... 8,362 8,362 8,362 8,362 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
855 

160 0605801KA DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) ....................................... 56,024 56,024 46,024 56,024 

DTIC reduction ........................................................................................ [–10,000 ] 

161 0605803SE R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION .............. 6,908 6,908 6,908 6,908 162 0605804D8Z DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION ............................................................ 15,451 19,451 20,451 4,000 19,451 

DT&E transfer from SE ........................................................................... [5,000 ] Program increase .................................................................................... [4,000 ] [4,000 ] 

164 0605898E MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D ................................................................................. 71,659 71,659 71,659 71,659 

165 0606100D8Z BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS ........................................................... 4,083 4,083 4,083 4,083

167 0203345D8Z DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) ........................................ 5,306 5,306 5,306 5,306 168 0204571J JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT ................................................................. 2,097 2,097 2,097 2,097 172 0303166J SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES ........................... 8,394 8,394 8,394 8,394 175 0305193D8Z CYBER INTELLIGENCE ...................................................................................... 7,624 7,624 7,624 7,624 178 0804767D8Z COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2) 43,247 43,247 43,247 43,247 179 0901598C MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA ................................................................................. 37,712 37,712 37,712 37,712 180 0901598D8W MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS ................................................................ 607 607 607 607 

181A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 54,914 54,914 54,914 54,914 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............................................................ 913,028 917,028 903,028 4,000 917,028 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 

182 0604130V ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) ............................................................ 7,552 7,552 7,552 7,552 

183 0605127T REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE 

INFORMATION MANA.

3,270 3,270 3,270 3,270 

184 0605147T OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM 

(OHASIS).

287 287 287 287 

185 0607210D8Z INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT ............................. 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 186 0607310D8Z OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ........................................................... 1,955 1,955 1,955 1,955 

187 0607327T GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION 

SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS).

13,250 13,250 13,250 13,250 

188 0607384BP CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT). 13,026 13,026 13,026 13,026 

190 0607828J JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ................................................... 12,652 12,652 12,652 12,652 191 0208043J PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) ................................................ 3,061 3,061 3,061 3,061 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
856 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

192 0208045K C4I INTEROPERABILITY ..................................................................................... 72,726 72,726 72,726 72,726 194 0301144K JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING ............................................ 6,524 6,524 6,524 6,524 201 0302016K NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT ................................ 512 512 512 512 202 0302019K DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION ............... 12,867 12,867 12,867 12,867 203 0303126K LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS ............................................................. 36,565 36,565 36,565 36,565 204 0303131K MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) .... 13,144 13,144 13,144 13,144 205 0303135G PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) ............................................................... 1,060 1,060 1,060 1,060 206 0303136G KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) .................................................... 33,279 33,279 33,279 33,279207 0303140D8Z INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 10,673 10,673 10,673 10,673208 0303140G INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM ................................................. 181,567 179,291 181,567 181,567 

Excess to need ........................................................................................ [–2,276 ] 

210 0303150K GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM .................................................... 34,288 34,288 34,288 34,288 211 0303153K DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION ............................................................... 7,741 7,741 7,741 7,741 

212 0303170K NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) ................................................. 3,325 3,325 3,325 3,325 213 0303260D8Z DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO) .......................... 1,246 1,246 1,246 1,246 214 0303610K TELEPORT PROGRAM ........................................................................................ 5,147 5,147 5,147 5,147 216 0304210BB SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES ................................................. 17,352 17,352 17,352 17,352 220 0305103K CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE ............................................................................ 3,658 3,658 3,658 3,658 221 0305125D8Z CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) ............................................... 9,752 9,752 9,752 9,752 225 0305186D8Z POLICY R&D PROGRAMS .................................................................................. 3,210 3,210 4,210 1,000 4,210 

CRRC extension ....................................................................................... [1,000 ] [1,000 ] 

227 0305199D8Z NET CENTRICITY ............................................................................................... 21,602 21,602 21,602 21,602 

230 0305208BB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 5,195 5,195 5,195 5,195 233 0305208K DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS ..................................... 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 235 0305219BB MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV .................................................................................. 641 641 641 641 

238 0305387D8Z HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM .............................. 2,338 2,338 2,338 2,338 239 0305600D8Z INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES ............... 4,372 4,372 4,372 4,372 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
857 

247 0708011S INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................ 24,691 24,691 24,691 24,691 248 0708012S LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................... 4,659 4,659 4,659 4,659 249 0902298J MANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS ................................................................................. 3,533 3,533 3,533 3,533 250 1105219BB MQ–9 UAV ........................................................................................................ 1,314 1,314 13,314 12,000 13,314 

Capability Improvements ........................................................................ [12,000 ] [12,000 ] 

254 1160403BB AVIATION SYSTEMS ........................................................................................... 156,561 156,561 156,561 156,561 256 1160405BB SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT ...................... 7,705 7,705 7,705 7,705 257 1160408BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS ................................................................. 42,620 42,620 42,620 42,620 261 1160431BB WARRIOR SYSTEMS .......................................................................................... 17,970 17,970 17,970 17,970 262 1160432BB SPECIAL PROGRAMS ......................................................................................... 7,424 7,424 7,424 7,424 268 1160480BB SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES .................................................................................. 2,206 2,206 2,206 2,206 271 1160483BB MARITIME SYSTEMS ......................................................................................... 18,325 18,325 19,481 1,156 19,481 

CCFLIR—Transfer at USSOCOM Request ............................................... [1,156 ] [1,156 ] 

274 1160489BB SOF GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES ............................................... 3,304 3,304 3,304 3,304 275 1160490BB SOF OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE ......................................... 16,021 16,021 16,021 16,021 

275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................... 3,773,704 3,773,704 3,773,704 3,773,704 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 4,641,222 4,638,946 4,655,378 14,156 4,655,378 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

276 999999999 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................ –100,000 0 

DARPA undistributed reduction .............................................................. [–100,000 ] 

SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ......................................................................... –100,000 0 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW ....................... 17,667,108 18,139,232 17,809,264 551,156 18,218,264 

OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT 

001 0605118OTE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION .............................................................. 75,720 75,720 75,720 75,720 

002 0605131OTE LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION .................................................................... 48,423 48,423 48,423 48,423 003 0605814OTE OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES ............................................... 62,157 62,157 62,157 62,157 

SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ............................................................ 186,300 186,300 186,300 186,300 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
858 

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE ................................... 186,300 186,300 186,300 186,300 

TOTAL RDT&E ...................................................................................... 67,520,236 68,079,460 67,541,495 219,227 67,739,463 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
859 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION 

087 0604622A FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES .............................................................. 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 

SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION ........................... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY ..................... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

224A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................. 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY ...................... 34,426 34,426 34,426 34,426 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 

252A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT .................................. 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF .......................... 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 

OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 

275A 9999999999 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208 

SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT .................................... 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208 

TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW ......................... 66,208 66,208 66,208 66,208 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
860 

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Program Element Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

TOTAL RDT&E ........................................................................................ 116,634 116,634 116,634 116,634 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
861 

TITLE XLIII—OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................................................................. 888,114 1,072,714 1,084,014 171,000 1,059,114 

Missile Defense Deployment to Guam .................................................................... [13,100 ] Program decrease .................................................................................................... [–24,000 ] Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [195,500 ] [195,900 ] [171,000 ] 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ........................................................................................ 72,624 72,624 72,624 72,624 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ............................................................................................. 617,402 617,402 617,402 617,402 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................................................................... 602,262 602,262 602,262 602,262 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 1,032,484 1,032,484 1,032,484 1,032,484 060 AVIATION ASSETS .............................................................................................................. 1,287,462 1,303,262 1,303,262 15,800 1,303,262 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [15,800 ] [15,800 ] [15,800 ] 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................... 3,559,656 3,559,656 3,769,556 209,000 3,768,656 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [209,900 ] [209,000 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ................................................................................ 454,477 454,477 454,477 454,477 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................... 1,481,156 1,481,156 1,681,156 225,000 1,706,156 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [200,000 ] [225,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................................ 7,278,154 7,278,154 7,278,154 7,278,154 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 2,754,712 3,011,712 2,754,712 257,000 3,011,712 

Realignment of Arlington National Cemetary operations ....................................... [–25,000 ] [–25,000 ] Sustainment to 90% ............................................................................................... [282,000 ] [282,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
862 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ........................................................................... 425,271 425,271 425,271 425,271 130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .............................................................. 185,064 185,064 180,064 185,064 

Unjustified growth ................................................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

170 COMBATANT COMMANDERS ANCILLARY MISSIONS .......................................................... 463,270 456,594 463,270 463,270 

Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations .............................................. [3,100 ] Unjustified EUCOM Growth ...................................................................................... [–9,776 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 21,102,108 21,552,832 21,718,708 877,800 21,979,908 

MOBILIZATION 

180 STRATEGIC MOBILITY ........................................................................................................ 360,240 360,240 360,240 360,240 

190 ARMY PREPOSITIONING STOCKS ....................................................................................... 192,105 192,105 192,105 192,105 200 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ............................................................................................ 7,101 7,101 7,101 7,101 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ........................................................................................ 559,446 559,446 559,446 559,446 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

210 OFFICER ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 115,992 115,992 115,992 115,992 

220 RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................................................... 52,323 52,323 52,323 52,323 230 ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING ........................................................................................... 43,589 43,589 43,589 43,589 240 SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS ................................................................ 453,745 453,745 453,745 453,745 250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................................................................... 1,034,495 1,034,495 1,034,495 1,034,495 260 FLIGHT TRAINING .............................................................................................................. 1,016,876 1,016,876 1,016,876 1,016,876 270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ...................................................................... 186,565 186,565 186,565 186,565 280 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................................................................... 652,514 652,514 652,514 652,514 290 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 485,500 485,500 485,500 485,500 300 EXAMINING ........................................................................................................................ 170,912 170,912 170,912 170,912 310 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................................................... 251,523 251,523 251,523 251,523 320 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................................................ 184,422 184,422 184,422 184,422 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
863 

330 JUNIOR ROTC .................................................................................................................... 181,105 181,105 181,105 181,105 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 4,829,561 4,829,561 4,829,561 4,829,561 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 690,089 690,089 690,089 690,089 

360 CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................... 774,120 779,120 774,120 774,120 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ........................................................ [5,000 ] 

370 LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................... 651,765 651,765 651,765 651,765 

380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................. 453,051 453,051 453,051 453,051 390 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 487,737 487,737 487,737 487,737 400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 1,563,115 1,563,115 1,563,115 1,563,115 410 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 326,853 326,853 326,853 326,853 420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ........................................................................................... 234,364 234,364 234,364 234,364 430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 1,212,091 1,212,091 1,212,091 1,212,091 440 ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................. 243,540 243,540 243,540 243,540 450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................. 241,101 241,101 241,101 241,101 460 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................................ 226,291 226,291 226,291 226,291 470 SUPPORT OF NATO OPERATIONS ...................................................................................... 426,651 457,851 426,651 31,200 457,851 

Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters from O&M Defense-wide [31,200 ] [31,200 ] 

480 MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS ................................................................................ 27,248 24,148 27,248 27,248 

Realignment of SOUTHCOM Information Operations .............................................. [–3,100 ] 

525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 1,023,946 1,023,946 1,023,946 1,023,946 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................................. 8,581,962 8,615,062 8,581,962 31,200 8,613,162 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

530 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –740,300 –284,300 –284,300 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..................................................... [–284,300 ] [–284,300 ] Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–456,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –740,300 –284,300 –284,300 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY ....................................................... 35,073,077 34,816,601 35,689,677 624,700 35,697,777 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
864 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................................................................. 1,621 1,621 1,621 1,621 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ........................................................................................ 24,429 24,429 24,429 24,429 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ............................................................................................. 657,099 657,099 657,099 657,099 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................................................................... 122,485 122,485 122,485 122,485 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 584,058 584,058 584,058 584,058 060 AVIATION ASSETS .............................................................................................................. 79,380 79,380 79,380 79,380 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................... 471,616 471,616 471,616 471,616 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ................................................................................ 74,243 74,243 74,243 74,243 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................... 70,894 70,894 70,894 75,800 146,694 

Army Reserve identified shortfall—restore unjustified efficiency reduction ......... [75,800 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................................ 569,801 569,801 569,801 569,801 

110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 294,145 323,245 330,545 36,400 330,545 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [29,100 ] [36,400 ] [36,400 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ........................................................................... 51,853 51,853 51,853 51,853 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 3,001,624 3,030,724 3,038,024 112,200 3,113,824 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 10,735 10,735 10,735 10,735 

140 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 24,197 24,197 24,197 24,197 150 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 10,304 10,304 10,304 10,304 160 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 10,319 10,319 10,319 10,319 170 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 37,857 37,857 37,857 37,857 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 93,412 93,412 93,412 93,412 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES ............................................... 3,095,036 3,124,136 3,131,436 112,200 3,207,236 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
865 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ............................................................................................................. 800,880 800,880 800,880 800,880 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ........................................................................................ 178,650 178,650 178,650 178,650 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ............................................................................................. 771,503 771,503 771,503 771,503 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ................................................................................................... 98,699 98,699 98,699 98,699 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 38,779 38,779 38,779 38,779 060 AVIATION ASSETS .............................................................................................................. 922,503 922,503 922,503 922,503 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................... 761,056 761,056 761,056 761,056 080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ................................................................................ 62,971 62,971 62,971 62,971 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................... 233,105 233,105 233,105 233,105 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................................................ 1,019,059 1,019,059 1,019,059 1,019,059 110 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 712,139 786,339 786,339 74,200 786,339 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [74,200 ] [74,200 ] [74,200 ] 

120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ........................................................................... 1,013,715 1,013,715 1,013,715 –13,297 1,000,418 

Army National Guard identified severance pay excess to requirement ................. [–13,297 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 6,613,059 6,687,259 6,687,259 60,903 6,673,962 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

130 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 10,812 10,812 10,812 10,812 

140 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................. 1,551 1,551 1,551 1,551 150 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 78,284 78,284 78,284 78,284 160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 46,995 46,995 46,995 46,995 170 MANPOWER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 6,390 6,390 6,390 6,390 180 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 297,105 297,105 297,105 297,105 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 441,137 441,137 441,137 441,137 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

190 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –15,000 –15,000 

Unjustified Growth For Civilian Personnel Compensation ...................................... [–15,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –15,000 –15,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
866 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG ....................................................... 7,054,196 7,128,396 7,128,396 45,903 7,100,099 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ....................................................................... 4,952,522 4,952,522 4,985,022 32,500 4,985,022 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [32,500 ] [32,500 ] 

020 FLEET AIR TRAINING ......................................................................................................... 1,826,404 1,826,404 1,837,604 1,826,404 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [11,200 ] 

030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES ................................................... 38,639 38,639 38,639 38,639 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT .......................................................................... 90,030 90,030 90,030 90,030 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 362,700 362,700 362,700 362,700 060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................... 915,881 915,881 915,881 40,000 955,881 

Navy Unfunded Requirement for Air Depot Maintenance ....................................... [40,000 ] 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................................... 35,838 35,838 36,446 35,838 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [608 ] 

080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ......................................................................................................... 379,914 448,414 379,914 379,914 

CLS for AVN Logistics ............................................................................................. [68,500 ] 

090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .......................................................................... 3,884,836 3,884,836 3,984,336 110,900 3,995,736 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [99,500 ] [99,500 ] Spares ...................................................................................................................... [11,400 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ......................................................................... 734,852 734,852 796,252 734,852 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [61,400 ] 

110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 5,191,511 5,191,511 5,197,211 5,191,511 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [5,700 ] 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................. 1,351,274 1,351,274 1,477,474 30,000 1,381,274 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [126,200 ] [30,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
867 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .............................................................................................. 701,316 691,722 701,316 701,316 

New START treaty implementation, excluding verification and inspection activities ...................................................................................................................... [–9,594 ] 

140 ELECTRONIC WARFARE ..................................................................................................... 97,710 97,710 97,710 97,710 150 SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE .............................................................................. 172,330 172,330 172,330 172,330 160 WARFARE TACTICS ............................................................................................................ 454,682 454,682 454,682 454,682 170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ........................................................ 328,406 328,406 328,406 328,406 180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .............................................................................................. 946,429 946,429 946,429 136,868 1,083,297 

Navy Unfunded Requirement for Navy Expeditionary Combat Enterprise Reset/ 

Depot ................................................................................................................... [148,000 ] 

Unjustified growth for human resources functions ................................................ [–11,132 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................... 142,249 148,249 142,249 142,249 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ........................................................ [6,000 ] 

200 DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT .......................................................................................... 2,603 2,603 3,263 2,603 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [660 ] 

210 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .............................................................. 102,970 102,970 102,970 102,970 

220 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT .................................................. 199,128 199,128 196,128 199,128 

Classified program decrease .................................................................................. [–3,000 ] 

230 CRUISE MISSILE ................................................................................................................ 92,671 92,671 92,671 92,671 

240 FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE ................................................................................................. 1,193,188 1,193,188 1,193,188 1,193,188 250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT ...................................................................... 105,985 105,985 105,985 105,985 260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 532,627 532,627 532,627 532,627 270 OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT ................................................................................ 304,160 304,160 304,160 304,160 280 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 1,011,528 1,011,528 1,011,528 1,011,528 290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 1,996,821 2,182,021 2,096,821 136,000 2,132,821 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [185,200 ] [100,000 ] [136,000 ] 

300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 4,460,918 4,460,918 4,460,918 4,460,918 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 32,610,122 32,860,228 33,044,890 486,268 33,096,390 

MOBILIZATION 

310 SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE .................................................................................. 331,576 331,576 331,576 331,576 

320 AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS ............................................................................ 6,638 6,638 6,638 6,638 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
868 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

330 SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS .................................................................................... 222,752 222,752 222,752 222,752 340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS .................................................................. 73,310 73,310 73,310 73,310 350 INDUSTRIAL READINESS .................................................................................................... 2,675 2,675 2,675 2,675 360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT ................................................................................................... 23,794 23,794 23,794 23,794 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ........................................................................................ 660,745 660,745 660,745 660,745 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

370 OFFICER ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 148,516 148,516 148,516 148,516 

380 RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................................................... 9,384 9,384 9,384 9,384 390 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS .............................................................................. 139,876 139,876 139,876 139,876 400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................................................................... 630,069 630,069 630,069 630,069 410 FLIGHT TRAINING .............................................................................................................. 9,294 9,294 9,294 9,294 420 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ...................................................................... 169,082 169,082 169,082 169,082 430 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................................................................... 164,368 164,368 164,368 164,368 440 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 241,733 242,833 241,733 1,100 242,833 

Naval Sea Cadets .................................................................................................... [1,100 ] [1,100 ] 

450 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................................................... 139,815 139,815 139,815 139,815 460 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................................................ 94,632 94,632 94,632 94,632 470 JUNIOR ROTC .................................................................................................................... 51,373 51,373 51,373 51,373 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 1,798,142 1,799,242 1,798,142 1,100 1,799,242 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 886,088 886,088 886,088 886,088 

490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS ....................................................................................................... 13,131 13,131 13,131 13,131 500 CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ..................................................... 115,742 115,742 115,742 115,742 510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................... 382,150 382,150 382,150 382,150 520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT ........................................................................................... 268,403 268,403 268,403 268,403 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
869 

530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 317,293 317,293 317,293 317,293 550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 207,128 207,128 207,128 207,128 570 PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ............................................................................ 295,855 295,855 295,855 295,855 580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 1,140,484 1,140,484 1,140,484 1,140,484 590 HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT .............................................................. 52,873 52,873 52,873 52,873 600 COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS ............................................................................................ 27,587 27,587 27,587 27,587 610 SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS ................................................................. 75,728 75,728 75,728 75,728 620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ........................................................................................ 543,026 543,026 543,026 543,026 680 INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES ............................................................. 4,965 4,965 4,965 4,965705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 545,775 545,775 545,775 545,775 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 4,876,228 4,876,228 4,876,228 4,876,228 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

710 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –278,200 –30,000 –30,000 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..................................................... [–38,500 ] [–30,000 ] Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–239,700 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –278,200 –30,000 –30,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY ........................................................ 39,945,237 39,918,243 40,380,005 457,368 40,402,605 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES ...................................................................................................... 837,012 926,012 837,012 75,000 912,012 

Crisis Response Force ............................................................................................. [40,600 ] [40,000 ] Marine Security Guard ............................................................................................. [48,400 ] [35,000 ] 

020 FIELD LOGISTICS ............................................................................................................... 894,555 898,555 894,555 894,555 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ........................................................ [4,000 ] 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 223,337 221,337 279,337 56,000 279,337 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [56,000 ] [56,000 ] Unjustified Growth HUMVEE Modifications ............................................................. [–2,000 ] 

040 MARITIME PREPOSITIONING .............................................................................................. 97,878 97,878 97,878 97,878 

050 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ............................................................ 774,619 781,719 774,619 774,619 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
870 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Sustainment to 90% ............................................................................................... [7,100 ] 

060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 2,166,661 2,166,661 2,166,661 2,166,661 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 4,994,062 5,092,162 5,050,062 131,000 5,125,062 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

070 RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................................................... 17,693 17,693 17,693 17,693 

080 OFFICER ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 896 896 896 896 090 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................................................................... 100,806 100,806 100,806 100,806 100 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ...................................................................... 46,928 46,928 46,928 46,928 110 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................................................................... 356,426 356,426 356,426 356,426 120 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 179,747 179,747 179,747 179,747 130 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................................................... 52,255 52,255 52,255 52,255 140 JUNIOR ROTC .................................................................................................................... 23,138 23,138 23,138 23,138 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 777,889 777,889 777,889 777,889 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 43,816 43,816 43,816 43,816 

160 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 305,107 305,107 305,107 305,107 180 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 87,500 87,500 87,500 87,500 185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 46,276 46,276 46,276 46,276 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 482,699 482,699 482,699 482,699 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

190 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –50,000 0 

Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–50,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –50,000 0 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
871 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS ....................................... 6,254,650 6,302,750 6,310,650 131,000 6,385,650 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS ....................................................................... 586,620 586,620 588,520 1,900 588,520 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [1,900 ] [1,900 ]

020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................... 7,008 7,008 7,008 7,008 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................... 100,657 100,657 109,557 8,900 109,557 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [8,900 ] [8,900 ]

050 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................................... 305 305 305 305 060 AVIATION LOGISTICS ......................................................................................................... 3,927 3,927 3,927 3,927 070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .......................................................................... 75,933 75,933 75,933 75,933 080 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ......................................................................... 601 601 601 601 090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 44,364 44,364 44,364 44,364 100 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS .............................................................................................. 15,477 15,477 15,477 15,477 110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES .............................................................................................. 115,608 115,608 115,608 115,608 120 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 1,967 1,967 1,967 1,967 130 ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 43,726 43,726 43,726 43,726 140 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 69,011 74,011 69,011 5,000 74,011 

Sustainment to 90% ............................................................................................... [5,000 ] [5,000 ] 

150 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 109,604 109,604 109,604 109,604 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 1,174,808 1,179,808 1,185,608 15,800 1,190,608 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

160 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 2,905 2,905 2,905 2,905 

170 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ................................................... 14,425 14,425 14,425 14,425 180 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 2,485 2,485 2,485 2,485 190 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 3,129 3,129 3,129 3,129 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 22,944 22,944 22,944 22,944 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES ................................................ 1,197,752 1,202,752 1,208,552 15,800 1,213,552 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
872 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES .......................................................................................................... 96,244 96,244 96,244 96,244 

020 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 17,581 19,081 17,581 17,581 

Restore Critical Depot Maintenance ....................................................................... [1,500 ] 

030 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ........................................................ 32,438 32,738 32,438 300 32,738 

Sustainment to 90% ............................................................................................... [300 ] [300 ] 

040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT .............................................................................................. 95,259 95,259 95,259 95,259 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 241,522 243,322 241,522 300 241,822 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

050 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................... 894 894 894 894 

060 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 11,743 11,743 11,743 11,743 070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 9,158 9,158 9,158 9,158 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 21,795 21,795 21,795 21,795 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE ........................................... 263,317 265,117 263,317 300 263,617 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .............................................................................................. 3,295,814 3,295,814 3,515,814 146,800 3,442,614 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [220,000 ] [146,800 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ..................................................................................... 1,875,095 1,875,095 1,875,095 1,875,095 030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) ........................................................ 1,559,109 1,559,109 1,589,109 20,000 1,579,109 

Increase for ranges ................................................................................................. [30,000 ] [20,000 ] 

040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 5,956,304 5,961,304 6,146,304 190,000 6,146,304 

Corrosion Prevention, Control, and Mitigation ........................................................ [5,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
873 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [190,000 ] [190,000 ] 

050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 1,834,424 2,224,454 1,909,424 100,314 1,934,738 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [219,500 ] [75,000 ] [100,314 ] Restoration, Modernization, and Demolition project shortfalls .............................. [170,530 ] 

060 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 2,779,811 2,779,811 2,779,811 2,779,811 070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING ................................................................................... 913,841 913,841 913,841 –2,512 911,329 

Remove program growth for foreign currency fluctuation ..................................... [–2,512 ] 

080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS .............................................................................. 916,837 916,837 916,837 916,837 

100 TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ............................................................ 720,349 720,349 720,349 720,349 110 LAUNCH FACILITIES ........................................................................................................... 305,275 305,275 305,275 305,275 120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ............................................................................................... 433,658 433,658 433,658 433,658 130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT .................................................. 1,146,016 1,147,116 1,123,616 1,146,016 

Classified program decrease .................................................................................. [–22,400 ] NORTHCOM VOICE program ..................................................................................... [1,100 ] 

140 COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS .............................................................. 231,830 231,830 231,830 231,830 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 21,968,363 22,364,493 22,460,963 454,602 22,422,965 

MOBILIZATION 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ......................................................................................................... 2,015,902 2,015,902 2,015,902 2,015,902 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ......................................................................................... 147,216 147,216 147,216 147,216 170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 1,556,232 1,556,232 1,556,232 1,556,232 180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 167,402 167,402 167,402 167,402 190 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 707,040 707,040 707,040 707,040 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ........................................................................................ 4,593,792 4,593,792 4,593,792 4,593,792 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION ....................................................................................................... 102,334 102,334 102,334 102,334 

210 RECRUIT TRAINING ........................................................................................................... 17,733 17,733 17,733 17,733 220 RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) ................................................................. 94,600 94,600 94,600 94,600 230 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 217,011 217,011 217,011 217,011 240 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 800,327 800,327 800,327 800,327 250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ........................................................................................... 399,364 399,364 399,364 399,364 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
874 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

260 FLIGHT TRAINING .............................................................................................................. 792,275 792,275 792,275 792,275 270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION ...................................................................... 248,958 248,958 248,958 248,958 280 TRAINING SUPPORT ........................................................................................................... 106,741 106,741 106,741 106,741 290 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 319,331 319,331 339,331 20,000 339,331 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [20,000 ] [20,000 ] 

300 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 122,736 122,736 122,736 122,736 310 EXAMINING ........................................................................................................................ 3,679 3,679 3,679 3,679 320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .......................................................................... 137,255 137,255 137,255 137,255 330 CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING ................................................................................ 176,153 176,153 176,153 176,153 340 JUNIOR ROTC .................................................................................................................... 67,018 67,018 67,018 67,018 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 3,605,515 3,605,515 3,625,515 20,000 3,625,515 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS .................................................................................................... 1,103,684 1,103,684 1,103,684 1,103,684 

360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................... 919,923 919,923 919,923 919,923 370 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 56,601 52,601 56,601 56,601 

Heavy bomber eliminations related to New START treaty implementation ............ [–400 ] ICBM reductions related to New START implementation ....................................... [–3,600 ] 

380 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 281,061 281,061 281,061 281,061 

390 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 1,203,305 1,203,305 1,203,305 –5,177 1,198,128 

Unjustified increase for public-private competitions ............................................. [–5,177 ] 

400 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 593,865 593,865 593,865 593,865 

410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................... 574,609 574,609 574,609 574,609 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................... 1,028,600 1,013,200 1,028,600 1,028,600 

De-MIRVing ICBMs related to New START treaty implementation ......................... [–700 ] ICBM eliminations and Environmental Impact Study related to New START treaty implementation ............................................................................................... [–14,700 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
875 

430 CIVIL AIR PATROL ............................................................................................................. 24,720 24,720 24,720 24,720 460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 89,008 89,008 89,008 89,008 465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 1,227,796 1,222,996 1,227,796 1,227,796 

Classified Adjustment ............................................................................................. [–4,800 ] SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ................................................................ 7,103,172 7,078,972 7,103,172 –5,177 7,097,995 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –205,100 –200,000 –200,000 

Average civilian end strength above projection ..................................................... [–18,700 ] [–200,000 ] Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–186,400 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –205,100 –200,000 –200,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE .............................................. 37,270,842 37,437,672 37,783,442 269,425 37,540,267 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES .............................................................................................. 1,857,951 1,857,951 1,857,951 1,857,951 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................... 224,462 224,462 224,462 –4,400 220,062 

Unjustified growth in civilian personnel compensation ......................................... [–4,400 ] 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 521,182 521,182 521,182 521,182 

040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 89,704 98,804 98,404 8,970 98,674 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [9,100 ] [8,700 ] [8,970 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 360,836 360,836 360,836 360,836 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 3,054,135 3,063,235 3,062,835 4,570 3,058,705 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 64,362 64,362 64,362 64,362 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 15,056 15,056 15,056 15,056 080 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) .............................................................. 23,617 23,617 23,617 23,617 

090 OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) ..................................................................... 6,618 6,618 6,618 6,618 100 AUDIOVISUAL ..................................................................................................................... 819 819 819 819 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ................................. 110,472 110,472 110,472 110,472 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
876 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE ............................................ 3,164,607 3,173,707 3,173,307 4,570 3,169,177 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 

010 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 3,371,871 3,371,871 3,371,871 3,371,871 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................... 720,305 720,305 720,305 720,305 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 1,514,870 1,514,870 1,514,870 1,514,870 040 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION .......................................... 296,953 323,853 325,153 28,200 325,153 

Readiness funding increase .................................................................................... [26,900 ] [28,200 ] [28,200 ] 

050 BASE SUPPORT ................................................................................................................. 597,303 597,303 597,303 597,303 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 6,501,302 6,528,202 6,529,502 28,200 6,529,502 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................... 32,117 32,117 32,117 32,117 

070 RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING ........................................................................................ 32,585 32,585 32,585 32,585 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES ............................... 64,702 64,702 64,702 64,702 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG ......................................................... 6,566,004 6,592,904 6,594,204 28,200 6,594,204 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 

010 JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF .................................................................................................... 472,239 472,239 472,239 472,239 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ..................................................................................... 5,261,463 5,230,711 5,239,663 –27,852 5,233,611 

AFSOC Flying Hour Program .................................................................................... [70,100 ] [70,100 ] International SOF Information Sharing System ...................................................... [–7,017 ] [–7,017 ] Ongoing baseline contingency operations .............................................................. [–35,519 ] [–35,519 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
877 

Other Operations—military construction collateral equipment non-recurring 

costs .................................................................................................................... [–5,000 ] 

Pilot program for SOF family members .................................................................. [5,000 ] [5,000 ] Preserve the force and families—human performance program .......................... [–16,605 ] [–11,605 ] Preserve the force and families—resiliency .......................................................... [–8,786 ] [–8,786 ] Realignment of NATO Special Operations Headquarters to O&M, Army ................ [–31,200 ] [–31,200 ] Regional SOF Coordination Centers ........................................................................ [–14,725 ] [–14,725 ] USASOC Flying Hour Program ................................................................................. [18,000 ] [18,000 ] USSOCOM NCR Contractor Support ......................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–7,100 ] [–7,100 ] USSOCOM RSCC ...................................................................................................... [–14,700 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES .............................................................................. 5,733,702 5,702,950 5,711,902 –27,852 5,705,850 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

040 DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY .................................................................................. 157,397 157,397 157,397 157,397 

050 NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY ...................................................................................... 84,899 84,899 84,899 84,899 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .................................................................. 242,296 242,296 242,296 242,296 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

060 CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS .............................................................................................. 144,443 165,443 166,142 21,699 166,142 

STARBASE ................................................................................................................ [21,000 ] [21,699 ] [21,699 ] 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ................................................................................ 612,207 612,207 612,207 –29,000 583,207 

Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ....................................... [–29,000 ] 

090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ................................................................... 1,378,606 1,378,606 1,378,606 –59,000 1,319,606 

Overestimation of Civilian Full Time Equivalent Targets ....................................... [–59,000 ] 

110 DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY .......................................................................... 763,091 763,091 763,091 763,091 

120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY ...................................................................... 1,326,243 1,326,243 1,326,243 1,326,243 140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY ................................................................................. 29,933 29,933 29,933 29,933 150 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ........................................................................................... 462,545 462,545 462,545 –11,028 451,517 

Cost of DISA computing service rates .................................................................... [–11,028 ] 

160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ................................................................................................ 222,979 222,979 222,979 222,979 

170 DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE ............................................................................................... 21,594 21,594 21,594 21,594 180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY .................................................................... 788,389 788,389 769,389 –26,800 761,589 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
878 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Combating terrorism fellowship program ............................................................... [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] Global Train and Equip ........................................................................................... [–7,800 ] Regional centers for security centers—undistributed decrease ............................ [–12,000 ] [–12,000 ] 

190 DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE ........................................................................................... 546,603 546,603 546,603 546,603 

210 DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ........................................................ 35,151 35,151 35,151 35,151 220 DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ............................................................................ 438,033 438,033 438,033 438,033 240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY ............................................................ 2,713,756 2,713,756 2,743,756 2,713,756 

Disability Impact Aid ............................................................................................... [5,000 ] Supplemental Impact Aid ........................................................................................ [25,000 ] 

250 MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY ............................................................................................... 256,201 256,201 256,201 –1,400 254,801 

THAAD excess to requirement ................................................................................. [–1,400 ] 

270 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT ................................................................................. 371,615 217,715 98,315 –153,900 217,715 

Program decrease .................................................................................................... [–273,300 ] [–273,300 ] Program reduction ................................................................................................... [–153,900 ]Rephasing of Guam civilian water and waste water infrastructure projects ....... [119,400 ] 

280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ........................................................................ 2,010,176 1,922,676 2,003,176 –15,000 1,995,176 

BRAC 2015 Initiative ............................................................................................... [–8,000 ] [–8,000 ] Combatant Commanders Exercise Engagement Training Transformation ............. [90,500 ] OUSD(P) program decrease ..................................................................................... [–10,000 ] [–7,000 ] [–7,000 ] Procurement Technical Assistance Program—Enhanced Business Support ......... [10,000 ] Program decrease .................................................................................................... [–60,000 ] Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authorities .................................... [–35,000 ] Reduction to Building Partnership Capacity authorities ........................................ [–75,000 ] 

290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES ......................................................................... 616,572 616,572 616,572 –5,000 611,572 

Price Growth Requested as Program Growth ......................................................... [–5,000 ] 

295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS .................................................................................................... 14,283,558 14,287,648 14,308,558 40,000 14,323,558 

Classified adjustment ............................................................................................. [4,090 ] [10,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
879 

Increase to Operation Observant Compass ............................................................ [40,000 ] [30,000 ] Reduction to Operation Observant Compass .......................................................... [–15,000 ] SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ................................. 27,021,695 26,805,385 26,799,094 –239,429 26,782,266 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

305 UNDISTRIBUTED ................................................................................................................ –320,000 30,000 30,000 

Impact Aid ............................................................................................................... [25,000 ] [25,000 ] Impact Aid for Children with Severe Disabilities ................................................... [5,000 ] [5,000 ] Section 514. Study of Reserve Component General and Flag Officers ................. [3,000 ] Section 621. Expand the victims transitional compensation benefit .................... [10,000 ] Unobligated balances .............................................................................................. [–363,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................................... –320,000 30,000 30,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE ....................................... 32,997,693 32,430,631 32,753,292 –237,281 32,760,412 

MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS 

040 US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE 13,606 12,626 13,606 13,606 

Unjustified Growth ................................................................................................... [–980 ] 

050 OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID ..................................................... 109,500 109,500 109,500 109,500 

060 COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION .................................................................................. 528,455 528,455 528,455 528,455 080 ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD ................................................................................................ 256,031 256,031 256,031 –124,700 131,331 

Program decrease .................................................................................................... [–124,700 ]

090 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY ............................................................................ 298,815 298,815 298,815 298,815 100 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY ............................................................................. 316,103 316,103 316,103 316,103 110 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE .................................................................... 439,820 439,820 439,820 439,820 120 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE ....................................................................... 10,757 10,757 10,757 10,757 130 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES ................................................. 237,443 237,443 237,443 237,443 160 OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND ................................................ 5,000 5,000 –5,000 0 

Program reduction ................................................................................................... [–5,000 ] [–5,000 ] 

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS ......................................................... 2,215,530 2,209,550 2,215,530 –129,700 2,085,830 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
880 

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE .................................................................. 175,097,941 174,602,459 176,631,808 1,322,485 176,420,426 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
881 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ..................................................................................................................... 217,571 247,571 217,571 217,571 

Missile Defense Deployment—Other .............................................................................. [15,000 ] Missile Defense Deployment to Turkey ........................................................................... [15,000 ] 

020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ................................................................................................ 8,266 8,266 8,266 8,266 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ..................................................................................................... 56,626 56,626 56,626 56,626 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ........................................................................................................... 4,209,942 4,209,942 4,209,942 4,209,942 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................................... 950,567 950,567 943,567 950,567 

NSHQ—Transfer at DoD Request ................................................................................... [–7,000 ] 

060 AVIATION ASSETS ...................................................................................................................... 474,288 474,288 474,288 474,288 

070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 1,349,152 1,349,152 1,485,452 1,349,152 

BuckEye terrain data increase ........................................................................................ [56,300 ] Transfer from JIEDDO—Train the Force ......................................................................... [80,000 ] 

080 LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS ........................................................................................ 655,000 655,000 655,000 655,000 

090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................... 301,563 796,563 301,563 301,563 

Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance ....................................................................... [495,000 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 706,214 706,214 706,214 706,214 

140 ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................ 11,519,498 11,519,498 11,519,498 11,519,498 150 COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM .................................................................. 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 160 RESET ....................................................................................................................................... 2,240,358 3,740,358 2,240,358 1,100,000 3,340,358 

Restore Critical Army Reset ............................................................................................ [1,500,000 ] [1,100,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 22,749,045 24,774,045 22,878,345 1,100,000 23,849,045 

ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
882 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

350 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................. 4,601,356 4,601,356 4,601,356 4,601,356 380 AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 17,418 17,418 17,418 17,418 400 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 420 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .................................................................................................. 94,820 94,820 94,820 94,820 430 OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT ........................................................................................................ 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 450 REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 525 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 1,402,994 1,402,994 1,402,994 1,402,994 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES ..................................................................... 6,530,588 6,530,588 6,530,588 6,530,588 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

530 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ 91,100 

Increase to support higher fuel rates ............................................................................ [91,100 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. 91,100 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY ............................................................... 29,279,633 31,395,733 29,408,933 1,100,000 30,379,633 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES OPERATING FORCES 

030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ..................................................................................................... 6,995 6,995 6,995 6,995 050 LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT ...................................................................................... 2,332 2,332 2,332 2,332 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 608 608 608 608 090 LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................... 75,800 

Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance ....................................................................... [75,800 ] 

100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 42,935 118,735 42,935 42,935 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES ....................................................... 42,935 118,735 42,935 42,935 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
883 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG OPERATING FORCES 

010 MANEUVER UNITS ..................................................................................................................... 29,314 29,314 29,314 29,314 020 MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES ................................................................................................ 1,494 1,494 1,494 1,494 030 ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE ..................................................................................................... 15,343 15,343 15,343 15,343 040 THEATER LEVEL ASSETS ........................................................................................................... 1,549 1,549 1,549 1,549 060 AVIATION ASSETS ...................................................................................................................... 64,504 64,504 64,504 64,504 070 FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 31,512 31,512 31,512 31,512 100 BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 42,179 42,179 42,179 42,179 120 MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HQ’S ................................................................................... 11,996 11,996 11,996 11,996 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 197,891 197,891 197,891 197,891 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

160 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 1,480 1,480 1,480 1,480 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 1,480 1,480 1,480 1,480 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG ............................................................... 199,371 199,371 199,371 199,371 

AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND MINISTRY OF DEFENSE 

010 SUSTAINMENT ........................................................................................................................... 2,735,603 2,735,603 2,735,603 2,735,603 020 INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................................................... 278,650 278,650 278,650 278,650 030 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION .......................................................................................... 2,180,382 2,180,382 2,180,382 2,180,382 040 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 626,550 626,550 626,550 626,550 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE ................................................................................. 5,821,185 5,821,185 5,821,185 5,821,185 

MINISTRY OF INTERIOR 

060 SUSTAINMENT ........................................................................................................................... 1,214,995 1,214,995 1,214,995 1,214,995 080 EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION .......................................................................................... 54,696 54,696 54,696 54,696 090 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 626,119 626,119 626,119 626,119 

SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR ................................................................................. 1,895,810 1,895,810 1,895,810 1,895,810 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
884 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

DETAINEE OPS 

110 SUSTAINMENT ........................................................................................................................... 7,225 7,225 7,225 7,225 140 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS ..................................................................................................... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 

SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS ............................................................................................... 9,725 9,725 9,725 9,725 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

160 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ –1,500,000 –1,500,000 

Program decrease ........................................................................................................... [–1,500,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. –1,500,000 –1,500,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND ......................................................... 7,726,720 7,726,720 7,726,720 –1,500,000 6,226,720 

AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 

010 POWER ...................................................................................................................................... 279,000 279,000 250,000 –29,000 250,000 

Unjustified expenditure ................................................................................................... [–29,000 ] [–29,000 ] SUBTOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND ........................................................ 279,000 279,000 250,000 –29,000 250,000 

TOTAL AFGHANISTAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND .......................................................... 279,000 279,000 250,000 –29,000 250,000 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............................................................................. 845,169 845,169 845,169 845,169 030 AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES .......................................................... 600 600 600 600 040 AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT .................................................................................. 17,489 17,489 17,489 17,489 050 AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT ............................................................................................................ 78,491 78,491 78,491 78,491 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
885 

060 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 162,420 202,420 162,420 162,420 

Restore critical depot maintenance ................................................................................ [40,000 ] 

070 AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ................................................................................. 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 080 AVIATION LOGISTICS ................................................................................................................. 50,130 50,130 50,130 50,130 090 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .................................................................................. 949,539 960,939 949,539 949,539 

Spares ............................................................................................................................. [11,400 ] 

100 SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING ................................................................................ 20,226 20,226 20,226 20,226 110 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 1,679,660 1,843,660 1,679,660 1,679,660 

Program increase ............................................................................................................ [164,000 ] 

120 SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................................................... 126,000 

Program increase ............................................................................................................ [126,000 ] 

130 COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS ..................................................................................................... 37,760 37,760 37,760 37,760 160 WARFARE TACTICS .................................................................................................................... 25,351 25,351 25,351 25,351 170 OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY ............................................................... 20,045 20,045 20,045 20,045 180 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................................................................................... 1,212,296 1,665,296 1,212,296 1,212,296 

Combat forces equipment ............................................................................................... [148,000 ] Combat forces shortfall .................................................................................................. [305,000 ] 

190 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ....................................................................................................... 10,203 10,203 10,203 10,203 250 IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT .............................................................................. 127,972 127,972 127,972 127,972 260 WEAPONS MAINTENANCE .......................................................................................................... 221,427 221,427 221,427 221,427 290 SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION ............................................................... 13,386 13,386 13,386 13,386 300 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ...................................................................................................... 110,940 110,940 110,940 110,940 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 5,585,804 6,380,204 5,585,804 5,585,804 

MOBILIZATION 

340 EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS .......................................................................... 18,460 18,460 18,460 18,460 360 COAST GUARD SUPPORT .......................................................................................................... 227,033 227,033 227,033 227,033 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ................................................................................................ 245,493 245,493 245,493 245,493 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

400 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................................... 50,269 50,269 50,269 50,269 430 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................................................................................. 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
886 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......................................................................... 55,669 55,669 55,669 55,669 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

480 ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................................... 2,418 2,418 2,418 2,418 490 EXTERNAL RELATIONS .............................................................................................................. 516 516 516 516 510 MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ........................................................... 5,107 5,107 5,107 5,107 520 OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT .................................................................................................. 1,411 1,411 1,411 1,411 530 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 550 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................. 153,427 153,427 153,427 153,427 580 ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ............................................................................ 8,570 8,570 8,570 8,570 620 NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE ................................................................................................ 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 705 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 5,608 5,608 5,608 5,608 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 181,027 181,027 181,027 181,027 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

710 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ 155,400 

Increase to support higher fuel rates ............................................................................ [155,400 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. 155,400 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY ............................................................... 6,067,993 7,017,793 6,067,993 6,067,993 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATIONAL FORCES .............................................................................................................. 992,190 992,190 992,190 992,190 020 FIELD LOGISTICS ....................................................................................................................... 559,574 559,574 559,574 559,574 030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 570,000 626,000 570,000 570,000 

Restore High Priority Depot Maintenance ....................................................................... [56,000 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
887 

060 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ...................................................................................................... 69,726 69,726 69,726 69,726 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 2,191,490 2,247,490 2,191,490 2,191,490 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

110 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................................................................................. 108,270 108,270 134,270 108,270 

Transfer from JIEDDO—Train the Force ......................................................................... [26,000 ] SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......................................................................... 108,270 108,270 134,270 108,270 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

150 SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................................. 365,555 365,555 365,555 365,555 160 ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................................... 3,675 3,675 3,675 3,675 185 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 825 825 825 825 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 370,055 370,055 370,055 370,055 

UNDISTRIBUTED 

190 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ 5,400 

Increase to support higher fuel rates ............................................................................ [5,400 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. 5,400 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS ............................................... 2,669,815 2,731,215 2,695,815 2,669,815 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES OPERATING FORCES 

010 MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS .............................................................................. 17,196 17,196 17,196 17,196 020 INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 200 200 200 200 040 AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 070 MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS .................................................................................. 12,304 12,304 12,304 12,304 090 SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 6,790 6,790 6,790 6,790 110 COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES ...................................................................................................... 13,210 13,210 13,210 13,210 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 55,700 55,700 55,700 55,700 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES ........................................................ 55,700 55,700 55,700 55,700 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
888 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

010 OPERATING FORCES ................................................................................................................. 11,124 11,124 11,124 11,124 040 BASE OPERATING SUPPORT ...................................................................................................... 1,410 1,410 1,410 1,410 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 12,534 12,534 12,534 12,534 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE ................................................... 12,534 12,534 12,534 12,534 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE OPERATING FORCES 

010 PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES ...................................................................................................... 1,712,393 1,782,393 1,712,393 1,712,393 

Restore Critical Depot Maintenance ............................................................................... [70,000 ] 

020 COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES ............................................................................................. 836,104 836,104 836,104 836,104 

030 AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) ................................................................ 14,118 14,118 14,118 14,118 040 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 1,373,480 1,473,480 1,373,480 1,373,480 

Program increase ............................................................................................................ [100,000 ] 

050 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ................................................. 122,712 122,712 122,712 122,712 060 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 1,520,333 1,520,333 1,520,333 1,520,333 070 GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING .......................................................................................... 31,582 31,582 31,582 31,582 080 OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS ...................................................................................... 147,524 147,524 147,524 147,524 110 LAUNCH FACILITIES .................................................................................................................. 857 857 857 857 120 SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................... 8,353 8,353 8,353 8,353 130 COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT .......................................................... 50,495 50,495 50,495 50,495 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 5,817,951 5,987,951 5,817,951 5,817,951 

MOBILIZATION 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
889 

150 AIRLIFT OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................ 3,091,133 3,141,133 3,091,133 3,091,133 

Restore Critical Depot Maintenance ............................................................................... [50,000 ] 

160 MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS ................................................................................................ 47,897 47,897 47,897 47,897 170 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 387,179 887,179 387,179 130,000 517,179 

Program increase ............................................................................................................ [500,000 ] [130,000 ] 

180 FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION ................................................. 7,043 7,043 7,043 7,043190 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 68,382 68,382 68,382 68,382 

SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION ................................................................................................ 3,601,634 4,151,634 3,601,634 130,000 3,731,634 

TRAINING AND RECRUITING 

200 OFFICER ACQUISITION .............................................................................................................. 100 100 100 100 210 RECRUIT TRAINING ................................................................................................................... 478 478 478 478 240 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 19,256 19,256 19,256 19,256 250 SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING ................................................................................................... 12,845 12,845 12,845 12,845 260 FLIGHT TRAINING ...................................................................................................................... 731 731 731 731 270 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION .............................................................................. 607 607 607 607 280 TRAINING SUPPORT .................................................................................................................. 720 720 720 720 320 OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION .................................................................................. 152 152 152 152 

SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING .......................................................................... 34,889 34,889 34,889 34,889 

ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES 

350 LOGISTICS OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................ 86,273 86,273 86,273 86,273 360 TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................. 2,511 2,511 2,511 2,511 390 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 19,887 19,887 19,887 19,887 400 ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................................... 3,493 3,493 3,493 3,493 410 SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS ............................................................................................. 152,086 152,086 152,086 152,086 420 OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................. 269,825 269,825 269,825 269,825 460 INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ......................................................................................................... 117 117 117 117 465 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 16,558 16,558 16,558 16,558 

SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES ........................................................................ 550,750 550,750 550,750 550,750 

UNDISTRIBUTED 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
890 

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Line Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

470 UNDISTRIBUTED ........................................................................................................................ 284,000 

Increase to support higher fuel rates ............................................................................ [284,000 ] SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................. 284,000 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE ...................................................... 10,005,224 11,009,224 10,005,224 130,000 10,135,224 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE OPERATING FORCES 

030 DEPOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................... 26,599 26,599 26,599 26,599 050 BASE SUPPORT ......................................................................................................................... 6,250 6,250 6,250 6,250 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 32,849 32,849 32,849 32,849 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE .................................................... 32,849 32,849 32,849 32,849 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG OPERATING FORCES 

020 MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................... 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 

SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG ................................................................. 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE OPERATING FORCES 

020 SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ............................................................................................. 2,222,868 2,222,868 2,229,868 2,222,868 

NSHQ—Transfer at DoD Request ................................................................................... [7,000 ] SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................... 2,222,868 2,222,868 2,229,868 2,222,868 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
891 

ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES 

080 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY ........................................................................................ 27,781 27,781 27,781 27,781 090 DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY ........................................................................... 45,746 45,746 45,746 45,746 120 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY .............................................................................. 76,348 76,348 76,348 76,348 140 DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY ........................................................................................ 99,538 99,538 99,538 99,538 160 DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY ........................................................................................................ 9,620 9,620 9,620 9,620 180 DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY ............................................................................ 1,950,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 240 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY .................................................................... 100,100 100,100 100,100 100,100 280 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE ................................................................................ 38,227 73,227 38,227 38,227 

Realignment to Building Partnership Capacity authories .............................................. [35,000 ] 

290 WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES ................................................................................. 2,784 2,784 2,784 2,784 

295 CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................ 1,862,066 1,862,066 1,862,066 1,862,066 

SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES ......................................... 4,212,210 4,247,210 4,212,210 4,212,210 

TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE ............................................... 6,435,078 6,470,078 6,442,078 6,435,078 TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE .......................................................................... 62,829,052 67,071,152 62,962,352 –299,000 62,530,052 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
892 

TITLE XLIV—MILITARY PERSONNEL 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL. 

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Military Personnel Appropriations ................................................................................................. 130,399,881 130,219,281 130,129,881 –682,900 129,716,981 

Enlistment bonuses excess to requirement ....................................................................... [–38,000 ] Excess to requirement ........................................................................................................ [–64,300 ] 

Flight Paramedic Training Pay and Allowances—Army Guard ......................................... [4,500 ] Flight Paramedic Training Pay and Allowances—Army Reserve ...................................... [900 ] Full Time Pay and Allowances projected underexecution .................................................. [–10,000 ] Full Time Support projected underexecution ...................................................................... [–1,000 ] Military Personnel unobligated ........................................................................................... [–186,000 ] [–186,000 ] Permanent Change of Station Travel—Army ..................................................................... [–150,000 ] [–150,000 ] Recruiting and Retention programs excess to requirement .............................................. [–1,800 ] Reenlistment bonuses excess to requirement .................................................................... [–68,300 ] Reserve Incentive Programs excess to requirement .......................................................... [–7,750 ] Travel, Active Duty for Training, projected underexecution ............................................... [–18,000 ] Undistributed reduction consistent with pace of drawdown ............................................. [–120,000 ] [–137,750 ] 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions .................................................................. 6,676,750 6,676,750 6,676,750 6,676,750 Total, Military Personnel ............................................................................................................. 137,076,631 136,896,031 136,806,631 –682,900 136,393,731 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
893 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Item FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Military Personnel Appropriations ................................................................................................. 9,689,307 9,689,307 9,689,307 –40,500 9,648,807 

Projected underexecution .................................................................................................... [–40,500 ] 

Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions .................................................................. 164,033 164,033 164,033 164,033 Total, Military Personnel ............................................................................................................. 9,853,340 9,853,340 9,853,340 –40,500 9,812,840 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
894 

TITLE XLV—OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS. 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ....................................................................................... 25,158 25,158 25,158 25,158 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ........................................................... 25,158 25,158 25,158 25,158 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE FUEL COSTS SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL) ............................................................................. 61,731 61,731 61,731 61,731 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .................................................. 61,731 61,731 61,731 61,731 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .............................................................................................. 46,428 46,428 46,428 46,428 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................... 46,428 46,428 46,428 46,428 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA .................................................................................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA ........................................................... 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 1,412,510 

NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND LMSR MPF MLP ........................................................................................................................................ 134,917 134,917 22,717 –112,200 22,717 

Navy requested adjustment ....................................................................................... [–112,200 ] [–112,200 ] 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
895 

POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING .................................................................................................. 43,404 43,404 43,404 43,404 NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................. 116,784 116,784 116,784 116,784 DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS ................................................................................................. 60,703 60,703 60,703 60,703 TAH MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................................ 19,809 19,809 19,809 19,809 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................... 56,058 56,058 56,058 56,058 READY RESERVE FORCE ................................................................................................................ 299,025 299,025 299,025 299,025 

TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND ....................................................... 730,700 730,700 618,500 –112,200 618,500 

CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION OPERATION & MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................................ 451,572 451,572 451,572 451,572 RDT&E ........................................................................................................................................... 604,183 604,183 604,183 604,183 PROCUREMENT .............................................................................................................................. 1,368 1,368 1,368 1,368 

TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION ........................................ 1,057,123 1,057,123 1,057,123 1,057,123 

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................................................... 815,965 815,965 810,125 815,965 

Joint Interagency Task Force—West (PC3309) ......................................................... [–3,000 ] U.S. European Comman Counternarcotics Hedquaters Support (PC2346) ............... [–1,640 ] U.S. Special Operations Forces Support to U.S. European Command (PC6505) ..... [–1,200 ] 

DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM ......................................................................................... 122,580 122,580 122,580 122,580 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF ........................... 938,545 938,545 932,705 938,545 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................... 311,131 311,131 347,031 34,869 346,000 

Program increase ....................................................................................................... [35,900 ] [34,869 ] 

RDT&E PROCUREMENT .............................................................................................................................. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL .................................................. 312,131 312,131 348,031 34,869 347,000 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE ............................................................................................................................. 8,880,738 8,880,738 8,880,738 8,880,738 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
896 

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ................................................................................................................. 15,842,732 15,912,732 15,842,732 –67,000 15,775,732 

Behavioral health treatment of developmental disabilities ..................................... [60,000 ] Pharmaceutical drugs excess growth ....................................................................... [–67,000 ] Pilot program for investigational treatment of members of the Armed Forces for 

TBI and PTSD .......................................................................................................... [10,000 ]

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 2,505,640 2,505,640 2,505,640 2,505,640 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 1,450,619 1,450,619 1,450,619 1,450,619 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................. 368,248 368,248 368,248 368,248 EDUCATION AND TRAINING ............................................................................................................ 733,097 733,097 733,097 733,097 BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS .......................................................................................... 1,872,660 1,872,660 1,872,660 1,872,660 R&D RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................. 9,162 9,162 9,162 9,162 R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................. 47,977 47,977 47,977 47,977 R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................... 291,156 291,156 291,156 291,156 R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION ............................................................................................... 132,430 132,430 132,430 132,430 R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................ 161,674 161,674 161,674 161,674 R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT ................................................................................................ 72,568 72,568 72,568 72,568 R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT ............................................................................................... 14,646 14,646 14,646 14,646 RDT&E UNDISTRIBUTED DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING .............................................................................................................. 89,404 89,404 89,404 89,404 PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION ..................................................................................... 377,577 377,577 377,577 377,577 PROC IEHR .................................................................................................................................... 204,200 204,200 204,200 204,200 UNDISTRIBUTED ............................................................................................................................. –276,800 218,000 –57,000 –57,000 

DHP Unobligated ........................................................................................................ [–440,800 ] [–275,000 ] Restore Tricare savings ............................................................................................. [164,000 ] [218,000 ] [218,000 ] 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ................................................................. 33,054,528 32,847,728 33,272,528 –124,000 32,930,528 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
897 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ....................................................................... 37,638,854 37,432,054 37,774,714 –201,331 37,437,523 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
898 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS. 

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS ....................................................................................... 44,732 44,732 44,732 44,732 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY ........................................................... 44,732 44,732 44,732 44,732 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE C–17 CLS ENGINE REPAIR ............................................................................................................ 78,500 78,500 78,500 78,500 TRANSPORTATION FALLEN HEROES ............................................................................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE .................................................. 88,500 88,500 88,500 88,500 

WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) .............................................................................................. 131,678 131,678 131,678 131,678 

TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE ........................................... 131,678 131,678 131,678 131,678 

DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF OPERATING FORCES ...................................................................................................................... 376,305 376,305 376,305 376,305 

TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF ........................... 376,305 376,305 376,305 376,305 

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................... 10,766 10,766 10,766 10,766 

TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL .................................................. 10,766 10,766 10,766 10,766 

DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM IN-HOUSE CARE ............................................................................................................................. 375,958 375,958 375,958 375,958 PRIVATE SECTOR CARE ................................................................................................................. 382,560 382,560 382,560 382,560 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
899 

CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT ................................................................................................. 132,749 132,749 132,749 132,749 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 2,238 2,238 2,238 2,238 MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES .............................................................................................................. 460 460 460 460 EDUCATION AND TRAINING ............................................................................................................ 10,236 10,236 10,236 10,236 

TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM ................................................................. 904,201 904,201 904,201 904,201 

TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ....................................................................... 1,556,182 1,556,182 1,556,182 1,556,182 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
900 

TITLE XLVI—MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION. 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Army ALASKA Fort Wainwright AVIATION BATTALION COMPLEX 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 Army ALASKA Fort Wainwright AVIATION STORAGE HANGAR 58,000 58,000 58,000 58,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 66,000 66,000 66,000 66,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 73,000 73,000 73,000 73,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson CENTRAL ENERGY PLANT 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson FIRE STATION 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson RUNWAY 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Army COLORADO Fort Carson SIMULATOR BUILDING 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200 Army FLORIDA Eglin AFB AUTOMATED SNIPER FIELD FIRE RANGE 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Army GEORGIA Fort Gordon ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS CPLX, PH2 61,000 61,000 61,000 61,000 Army HAWAII Fort Shafter COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY—ADMIN 75,000 65,000 75,000 –5,000 70,000 Army KANSAS Fort Leavenworth SIMULATIONS CENTER 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Army KENTUCKY Fort Campbell BATTLEFIELD WEATHER SUPPORT FACILITY 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 Army MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving Ground OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 Army MARYLAND Fort Detrick ENTRY CONTROL POINT 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Army MARYLAND Fort Detrick HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE BUILDING 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 Army MISSOURI Fort Leonard Wood ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS CPLX, PH1 86,000 86,000 86,000 86,000 Army MISSOURI Fort Leonard Wood SIMULATOR BUILDING 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Army NEW YORK U.S. Military Academy CADET BARRACKS, INCR 2 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 Army NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss CONTROL TOWER 10,800 10,800 10,800 10,800 Army TEXAS Fort Bliss UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE COMPLEX 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Army VIRGINIA Joint Base Langley-Eustis ADV INDIVIDUAL TRAINING BARRACKS CPLX, PH3 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
901 

Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis-McChord AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 79,000 79,000 79,000 79,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis-McChord AIRFIELD OPERATIONS COMPLEX 37,000 37,000 37,000 37,000 Army WASHINGTON Joint Base Lewis-McChord AVIATION BATTALION COMPLEX 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 Army WASHINGTON Yakima AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN RANGE 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 Army WORLDWIDE 

CLASSIFIED 

Classified Location COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX 33,000 33,000 33,000 –33,000 0 

Army JAPAN Kyoga Misaki COMPANY OPERATIONS COMPLEX 0 0 0 33,000 33,000 Army KWAJALEIN Kwajalein Atoll PIER 63,000 63,000 63,000 63,000 Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations HOST NATION SUPPORT FY14 33,000 23,000 33,000 –5,000 28,000 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MINOR CONSTRUCTION FY14 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 

Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN FY14 41,575 41,575 41,575 41,575 

Total Military Construction, Army ................................................................................................................................. 1,119,875 1,099,875 1,119,875 –10,000 1,109,875 

Navy CALIFORNIA Barstow ENGINE DYNAMOMETER FACILITY 14,998 14,998 14,998 14,998 Navy CALIFORNIA Camp Pendleton AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT UPGRADE 13,124 13,124 13,124 13,124 Navy CALIFORNIA Coronado H–60 TRAINER FACILITY 8,910 8,910 8,910 8,910 Navy CALIFORNIA Point Mugu AIRCRAFT ENGINE TEST PADS 7,198 7,198 7,198 7,198 Navy CALIFORNIA Point Mugu BAMS CONSOLIDATED MAINTENANCE HANGAR 17,469 17,469 17,469 17,469 Navy CALIFORNIA Port Hueneme UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING CONVERSION 33,600 33,600 33,600 33,600 Navy CALIFORNIA San Diego STEAM PLANT DECENTRALIZATION 34,331 34,331 34,331 34,331 Navy CALIFORNIA Twentynine Palms CAMP WILSON INFRASTRUCTURE UPGRADES 33,437 33,437 33,437 33,437 Navy FLORIDA Jacksonville P–8A TRAINING & PARKING APRON EXPANSION 20,752 20,752 20,752 20,752 Navy FLORIDA Key West AIRCRAFT CRASH/RESCUE & FIRE HEADQUARTERS 14,001 14,001 14,001 14,001 Navy FLORIDA Mayport LCS LOGISTICS SUPPORT FACILITY 16,093 16,093 16,093 16,093 Navy GEORGIA Albany CERS DISPATCH FACILITY 1,010 1,010 1,010 1,010 Navy GEORGIA Albany WEAPONS STORAGE AND INSPECTION FACILITY 15,600 15,600 15,600 15,600 Navy GEORGIA Savannah TOWNSEND BOMBING RANGE LAND ACQ—PHASE 1 61,717 61,717 61,717 61,717 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR—NORTH RAMP 85,673 85,673 0 85,673 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas BAMS FORWARD OPERATIONAL & MAINTENANCE 

HANGAR 

61,702 61,702 61,702 61,702 

Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas DEHUMIDIFIED SUPPLY STORAGE FACILITY 17,170 17,170 17,170 17,170 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas EMERGENT REPAIR FACILITY EXPANSION 35,860 35,860 35,860 35,860 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas MODULAR STORAGE MAGAZINES 63,382 63,382 63,382 63,382 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
902 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas SIERRA WHARF IMPROVEMENTS 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 Navy GUAM Joint Region Marianas X-RAY WHARF IMPROVEMENTS 53,420 53,420 53,420 53,420 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay 3RD RADIO BN MAINTENANCE/OPERATIONS COMPLEX 25,336 25,336 25,336 25,336 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE EXPANSION 16,968 16,968 16,968 16,968 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR UPGRADES 31,820 31,820 31,820 31,820 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay ARMORY ADDITION AND RENOVATION 12,952 12,952 12,952 12,952 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay AVIATION SIMULATOR MODERNIZATION/ADDITION 17,724 17,724 17,724 17,724 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay MV–22 HANGAR 57,517 57,517 57,517 57,517 Navy HAWAII Kaneohe Bay MV–22 PARKING APRON AND INFRASTRUCTURE 74,665 74,665 74,665 74,665 Navy HAWAII Pearl City WATER TRANSMISSION LINE 30,100 30,100 30,100 30,100 Navy HAWAII Pearl Harbor DRYDOCK WATERFRONT FACILITY 22,721 22,721 22,721 22,721 Navy HAWAII Pearl Harbor SUBMARINE PRODUCTION SUPPORT FACILITY 35,277 35,277 35,277 35,277 Navy ILLINOIS Great Lakes UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING 35,851 35,851 35,851 35,851 Navy MAINE Bangor NCTAMS VLF COMMERCIAL POWER CONNECTION 13,800 13,800 13,800 13,800 Navy MAINE Kittery STRUCTURAL SHOPS CONSOLIDATION 11,522 11,522 11,522 11,522 Navy MARYLAND Fort Meade MARFORCYBERCOM HQ-OPS BUILDING 83,988 83,988 83,988 83,988 Navy NEVADA Fallon WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 11,334 11,334 11,334 11,334 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune LANDFILL—PHASE 4 20,795 20,795 20,795 20,795 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune OPERATIONS TRAINING COMPLEX 22,515 22,515 22,515 22,515 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION—BEQ NODES 18,679 18,679 18,679 18,679 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION—CAMP JOHNSON 2,620 2,620 2,620 2,620 Navy NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune STEAM DECENTRALIZATION—HADNOT POINT 13,390 13,390 13,390 13,390 Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River CH–53K MAINTENANCE TRAINING FACILITY 13,218 13,218 13,218 13,218 Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR 12,547 12,547 12,547 12,547 Navy NORTH CAROLINA New River REGIONAL COMMUNICATION STATION 20,098 20,098 20,098 20,098 Navy OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB TACAMO E–6B HANGAR 14,144 14,144 14,144 14,144 Navy RHODE ISLAND Newport HEWITT HALL RESEARCH CENTER 12,422 12,422 12,422 12,422 Navy SOUTH CAROLINA Charleston NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONAL TRAINING FACILITY 73,932 73,932 73,932 73,932 Navy VIRGINIA Dam Neck AERIAL TARGET OPERATION CONSOLIDATION 10,587 10,587 10,587 10,587 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
903 

Navy VIRGINIA Norfolk PIER 11 POWER UPGRADES FOR CVN–78 3,380 3,380 3,380 3,380 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION FACILITY TECOM SCHOOLS 25,731 25,731 25,731 25,731 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico ATC TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER RELOCATION 3,630 3,630 3,630 3,630 Navy VIRGINIA Quantico FULLER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 9,013 9,013 9,013 9,013 Navy VIRGINIA Yorktown SMALL ARMS RANGES 18,700 18,700 18,700 18,700 Navy WASHINGTON Bremerton INTEGRATED WATER TREATMENT SYS DRY DOCKS 

3&4 

18,189 18,189 18,189 18,189 

Navy WASHINGTON Kitsap EXPLOSIVES HANDLING WHARF #2 (INC) 24,880 24,880 24,880 24,880 Navy WASHINGTON Whidbey Island EA–18G FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 32,482 32,482 32,482 32,482 Navy WASHINGTON Whidbey Island P–8A HANGAR AND TRAINING FACILITIES 85,167 85,167 85,167 85,167 Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier ARMORY 6,420 6,420 6,420 6,420 Navy DJIBOUTI Camp Lemonier UNACCOMPANIED HOUSING 22,580 22,580 22,580 22,580 Navy JAPAN Camp Butler AIRFIELD SECURITY UPGRADES 5,820 5,820 5,820 5,820 Navy JAPAN Yokosuka COMMUNICATION SYSTEM UPGRADE 7,568 7,568 7,568 7,568 Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MCON DESIGN FUNDS 89,830 89,830 89,830 89,830 

Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 19,740 19,740 19,740 19,740 

Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 

Total Military Construction, Navy ................................................................................................................................. 1,700,269 1,700,269 1,614,596 0 1,700,269 

AF ARIZONA Luke AFB F–35 FIELD TRAINING DETACHMENT 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 AF ARIZONA Luke AFB F–35 SQ OPS/AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT #3 21,400 21,400 21,400 21,400 AF CALIFORNIA Beale AFB DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND STATION OPS BLDG 62,000 62,000 62,000 62,000 AF FLORIDA Tyndall AFB F–22 MUNITIONS STORAGE COMPLEX 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR—FUEL SYS HARDENED BLDGS 20,000 20,000 0 20,000 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR—STRIKE TACTICAL MISSILE MXS FACILITY 10,530 10,530 10,530 10,530 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PAR—TANKER GP MX HANGAR/AMU/SQD OPS 132,600 132,600 0 132,600 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC RED HORSE AIRFIELD OPERATIONS FACILITY 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 AF GUAM Joint Region Marianas PRTC SF FIRE RESCUE & EMERGENCY MGT 4,600 4,600 4,600 4,600 AF HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam C–17 MODERNIZE HGR 35, DOCKS 1&2 4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 

AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A 2–Bay Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Hangar 0 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A 3–Bay General Purpose Maintenance Hangar 0 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
904 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Aircraft Parking Apron Alteration 0 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Aprons Fuels Distribution System 0 12,800 12,800 12,800 12,800 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Flight Simulator Facility Phase 1 0 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A General Maintenance Hangar 0 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Miscellaneous Facilities Alteration 0 970 970 970 970 AF KANSAS McConnell AFB KC–46A Pipeline Student Dormatory 0 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 AF KENTUCKY Fort Campbell 19TH AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS SQDRN EXPANSION 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 AF MARYLAND Fort Meade CYBERCOM JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER, INCREMENT 

1 

85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 

AF MARYLAND Joint Base Andrews HELICOPTER OPERATIONS FACILITY 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 AF MISSOURI Whiteman AFB WSA MOP IGLOOS AND ASSEMBLY FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 AF NEBRASKA Offutt AFB USSTRATCOM REPLACEMENT FACILITY, INCR 3 136,000 136,000 136,000 136,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB ADD RPA WEAPONS SCHOOL FACILITY 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB DORMITORY (240 RM) 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F–35 ALT MISSION EQUIP (AME) STORAGE 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F–35 FUEL CELL HANGAR 9,400 9,400 9,400 9,400 AF NEVADA Nellis AFB F–35 PARTS STORE 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB AIRMEN AND FAMILY READINESS CENTER 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB DORMITORY (144 RM) 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 AF NEW MEXICO Cannon AFB SATELLITE DINING FACILITY 6,600 6,600 6,600 6,600 AF NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB F–16 AIRCRAFT COVERED WASHRACK AND PAD 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 AF NEW MEXICO Kirtland AFB NUCLEAR SYSTEMS WING & SUSTAINMENT CENTER 

(PH 

30,500 30,500 30,500 30,500 

AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB B–52 ADAL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE UNIT 15,530 15,530 15,530 15,530 AF NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB B–52 MUNITIONS STORAGE IGLOOS 8,300 8,300 8,300 8,300 AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU ADAL Fuel Systems Maintenance Dock 0 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350 AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU ADAL Squad Ops/AMU 0 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU Flight Training Center Simulators Facility Phase 1 0 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600 

AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU Fuselage Trainer Phase 1 0 6,300 6,300 6,300 6,300 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
905 

AF OKLAHOMA Altus AFB KC–46A FTU Renovate Facility 0 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 AF OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB KC–46A LAND ACQUISITION 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 AF TEXAS Fort Bliss F–16 BAK 12/14 AIRCRAFT ARRESTING SYSTEM 3,350 3,350 3,350 3,350 AF UTAH Hill AFB F–35 AIRCRAFT MX UNIT HANGAR 45E OPS #1 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 AF UTAH Hill AFB FIRE CRASH RESCUE STATION 18,500 18,500 18,500 18,500 AF VIRGINIA Joint Base Langley-Eustis 4–BAY CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS INSPECTION 

BLDG 

4,800 4,800 4,800 4,800 

AF GREENLAND Thule AB THULE CONSOLIDATION, PHASE 2 43,904 43,904 43,904 43,904 AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR—AIRPORT POL/BULK STORAGE AST 18,500 18,500 18,500 18,500 AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR—HAZARDOUS CARGO PAD 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 AF MARIANA ISLANDS Saipan PAR—MAINTENANCE FACILITY 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 AF UNITED KINGDOM Croughton RAF MAIN GATE COMPLEX 12,000 0 0 –12,000 0 AF UNITED KINGDOM VARLOCS GUARDIAN ANGEL OPERATIONS FACILITY 22,047 22,047 0 22,047 AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations KC–46A FTU FACILITY PROJECTS 63,000 0 0 –63,000 0 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations KC–46A MOB #1 FACILITY PROJECTS 192,700 0 0 –192,700 0 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING & DESIGN 11,314 11,314 11,314 11,314 

AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 20,448 20,448 20,448 20,448 

Total Military Construction, Air Force .......................................................................................................................... 1,156,573 1,138,843 964,196 –17,730 1,138,843 

Def-Wide ALASKA Clear AFS BMDS UPGRADE EARLY WARNING RADAR 17,204 17,204 17,204 17,204 Def-Wide ALASKA Fort Greely MECHANICAL-ELECTRICAL BLDG MISSILE FIELD #1 82,000 82,000 82,000 82,000 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Brawley SOF DESERT WARFARE TRAINING CENTER 23,095 23,095 23,095 23,095 Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Defense Distribution 

Depot-Tracy 

GENERAL PURPOSE WAREHOUSE 37,554 37,554 37,554 37,554 

Def-Wide CALIFORNIA Miramar REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Def-Wide COLORADO Fort Carson SOF GROUP SUPPORT BATTALION 22,282 22,282 22,282 22,282 Def-Wide FLORIDA Hurlburt Field SOF ADD/ALTER OPERATIONS FACILITY 7,900 7,900 7,900 7,900 Def-Wide FLORIDA Jacksonville REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Def-Wide FLORIDA Key West SOF BOAT DOCKS 3,600 0 3,600 3,600 Def-Wide FLORIDA Panama City REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING FACILITY 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Def-Wide FLORIDA Tyndall AFB REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Benning FAITH MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITION 6,031 6,031 6,031 6,031 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
906 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Benning WHITE ELEMTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 37,304 37,304 37,304 37,304 Def-Wide GEORGIA Fort Stewart DIAMOND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 44,504 44,504 44,504 44,504 Def-Wide GEORGIA Hunter Army Airfield REPLACE FUEL ISLAND 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 Def-Wide GEORGIA Moody AFB REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING FACILITY 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 Def-Wide HAWAII Ford Island DISA PACIFIC FACILITY UPGRADES 2,615 2,615 2,615 2,615 Def-Wide HAWAII Joint Base Pearl HarborHickam ALTER WAREHOUSE SPACE 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 

Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell FORT CAMPBELL HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 59,278 59,278 59,278 59,278 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell MARSHALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 38,591 38,591 38,591 38,591 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Campbell SOF GROUP SPECIAL TROOPS BATTALION 26,342 26,342 26,342 26,342 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Knox AMBULATORY HEALTH CENTER 265,000 265,000 75,000 –120,000 145,000 Def-Wide KENTUCKY Fort Knox CONSOLIDATE/REPLACE VAN VOORHIS-MUDGE ES 38,023 38,023 38,023 38,023 Def-Wide MARYLAND Aberdeen Proving Ground PUBLIC HEALTH COMMAND LAB REPLACEMENT 210,000 110,000 75,000 –135,000 75,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Bethesda Naval Hospital MECH & ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS 46,800 46,800 46,800 46,800 Def-Wide MARYLAND Bethesda Naval Hospital PARKING GARAGE 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Detrick USAMRIID REPLACEMENT STAGE 1, INCR 8 13,000 0 13,000 13,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Meade HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING CAPACITY INC 3 431,000 431,000 381,000 –35,000 396,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Fort Meade NSAW RECAPITALIZE BUILDING #1/SITE M INC 2 58,000 58,000 58,000 58,000 Def-Wide MARYLAND Joint Base Andrews AMBULATORY CARE CENTER INC 2 76,200 63,800 38,100 –38,100 38,100 Def-Wide MASSACHUSETTS Hanscom AFB HANSCOM PRIMARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 36,213 36,213 36,213 36,213 Def-Wide NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst REPLACE FUEL DISTRIBUTION COMPONENTS 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 

Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB MEDICAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Def-Wide NEW MEXICO Holloman AFB REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 21,400 21,400 21,400 21,400 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune SOF PERFORMANCE RESILIENCY CENTER 14,400 0 14,400 14,400 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Camp Lejeune SOF SUSTAINMENT TRAINING COMPLEX 28,977 28,977 28,977 28,977 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg CONSOLIDATE/REPLACE POPE HOLBROOK ELEMENTARY 37,032 37,032 37,032 37,032 

Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF CIVIL AFFAIRS BATTALION ANNEX 37,689 37,689 37,689 37,689 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF COMBAT MEDIC SKILLS SUSTAIN. COURSE BLDG 7,600 7,600 7,600 7,600 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
907 

Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF ENGINEER TRAINING FACILITY 10,419 10,419 10,419 10,419 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF LANGUAGE AND CULTURAL CENTER 64,606 64,606 64,606 64,606 Def-Wide NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg SOF UPGRADE TRAINING FACILITY 14,719 14,719 14,719 14,719 Def-Wide NORTH DAKOTA Minot AFB REPLACE FUEL PIPELINE 6,400 6,400 6,400 6,400 Def-Wide OKLAHOMA Altus AFB REPLACE REFUELER PARKING 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Def-Wide OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB REPLACE FUEL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA Def Distribution Depot 

New Cumberland 

UPGRADE HAZARDOUS MATERIAL WAREHOUSE 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 

Def-Wide PENNSYLVANIA Def Distribution Depot 

New Cumberland 

UPGRADE PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 

Def-Wide SOUTH CAROLINA Beaufort BOLDEN ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 41,324 41,324 41,324 41,324 

Def-Wide TENNESSEE Arnold Air Force Base REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING FACILITY 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 Def-Wide TEXAS Fort Bliss HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT INCR 5 252,100 152,100 100,000 –152,100 100,000 Def-Wide TEXAS Joint Base San Antonio SAMMC HYPERBARIC FACILITY ADDITION 12,600 12,600 12,600 12,600 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Dam Neck SOF HUMAN PERFORMANCE CENTER 11,147 0 11,147 11,147 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Def Distribution Depot 

Richmond 

OPERATIONS CENTER PHASE 1 87,000 87,000 87,000 87,000 

Def-Wide VIRGINIA Joint Expeditionary Base 

Little Creek—Story 

SOF LOGSU TWO OPERATIONS FACILITY 30,404 30,404 30,404 30,404 

Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon BOUNDARY CHANNEL ACCESS CONTROL POINT 6,700 6,700 6,700 6,700 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon ARMY NAVY DRIVE TOUR BUS DROP OFF 1,850 1,850 0 –1,850 0 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon PFPA SUPPORT OPERATIONS CENTER 14,800 14,800 14,800 14,800 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon RAVEN ROCK ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITY UPGRADE 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Pentagon RAVEN ROCK EXTERIOR COOLING TOWER 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 Def-Wide VIRGINIA Quantico QUANTICO MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 40,586 40,586 40,586 40,586 Def-Wide WASHINGTON Whidbey Island REPLACE FUEL PIER BREAKWATER 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Def-Wide WORLDWIDE 

CLASSIFIED 

Classified Location AN/TPY–2 RADAR SITE 15,000 15,000 15,000 –15,000 0 

Def-Wide BAHRAIN ISLAND SW Asia MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT 45,400 45,400 45,400 45,400 Def-Wide BELGIUM Brussels NATO HEADQUARTERS FACILITY 38,513 38,513 38,513 38,513 Def-Wide BELGIUM Brussels NATO HEADQUARTERS FIT-OUT 29,100 29,100 29,100 29,100 Def-Wide GERMANY Kaiserlautern AB KAISERSLAUTERN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 49,907 49,907 0 49,907 

Def-Wide GERMANY Ramstein AB RAMSTEIN HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 98,762 98,762 0 98,762 Def-Wide GERMANY Rhine Ordnance Barracks MEDICAL CENTER REPLACEMENT, INCR 3 151,545 151,545 76,545 –75,000 76,545 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
908 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Def-Wide GERMANY Weisbaden HAINERBERG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 58,899 58,899 0 58,899 Def-Wide GERMANY Weisbaden WIESBADEN MIDDLE SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 50,756 50,756 0 50,756 Def-Wide JAPAN Atsugi REPLACE GROUND VEHICLE FUELING FACILITY 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 Def-Wide JAPAN Iwakuni CONSTRUCT HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 Def-Wide JAPAN Kadena AB KADENA MIDDLE SCHOOL ADDITION/RENOVATION 38,792 38,792 38,792 38,792 Def-Wide JAPAN Kyoga Misaki AN/TPY–2 RADAR SITE 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 Def-Wide JAPAN Torri Commo Station SOF FACILITY AUGMENTATION 71,451 64,071 71,451 71,451 Def-Wide JAPAN Yokosuka UPGRADE FUEL PUMPS 10,600 10,600 10,600 10,600 Def-Wide KOREA Camp Walker DAEGU MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 52,164 52,164 52,164 52,164 Def-Wide ROMANIA Deveselu AEGIS ASHORE MISSILE DEF SYS CMPLX, INCREM. 2 85,000 80,000 85,000 –5,000 80,000 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall REPLACE FUEL STORAGE 17,732 17,732 0 17,732 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS AND HANGAR/AMU 0 48,448 0 48,448 48,448 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF AIRFILED PAVEMENTS 24,077 0 0 –24,077 0 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF HANGAR/AMU 24,371 0 0 –24,371 0 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF MRSP AND PARTS STORAGE 6,797 6,797 0 6,797 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Raf Mildenhall SOF SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY 11,652 11,652 0 11,652 Def-Wide UNITED KINGDOM Royal Air Force 

Lakenheath 

LAKENHEATH HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT 69,638 69,638 0 69,638 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION 10,000 0 10,000 –10,000 0 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations ENERGY CONSERVATION INVESTMENT PROGRAM 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations EXERCISE RELATED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 9,730 9,730 9,730 9,730 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING & DESIGN 10,891 10,891 10,891 10,891 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 50,192 50,192 50,192 50,192 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 75,905 75,905 75,905 75,905 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
909 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 57,053 57,053 57,053 57,053 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 36,866 36,866 36,866 36,866 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 6,931 6,931 6,931 6,931 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 7,430 7,430 7,430 7,430 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 5,409 5,409 5,409 5,409 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 5,170 5,170 5,170 5,170 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 9,578 9,578 9,578 9,578 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 

Def-Wide WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 

Total Military Construction, Defense-Wide .................................................................................................................. 3,985,300 3,708,373 2,930,659 –572,050 3,413,250 

Chem Demil KENTUCKY Blue Grass Army Depot AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY, PH XIV 122,536 122,536 122,536 122,536 

Total Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense ............................................................................................. 122,536 122,536 122,536 0 122,536 

NATO WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Nato Security Investment Program NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM 239,700 199,700 239,700 –40,000 199,700 

Total NATO Security Investment Program .................................................................................................................... 239,700 199,700 239,700 –40,000 199,700 

Army NG ALABAMA Decatur NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Army NG ARKANSAS Fort Chaffee SCOUT/RECCE GUNNERY COMPLEX 21,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 Army NG FLORIDA Pinellas Park READY BUILDING 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 Army NG ILLINOIS Kankakee AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 Army NG ILLINOIS Kankakee READINESS CENTER 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Army NG MASSACHUSETTS Camp Edwards ENLISTED BARRACKS, TRANSIENT TRAINING ADD 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Army NG MICHIGAN Camp Grayling ENLISTED BARRACKS, TRANSIENT TRAINING 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
910 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Army NG MINNESOTA Stillwater READINESS CENTER 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Army NG MISSISSIPPI Camp Shelby WATER SUPPLY/TREATMENT BUILDING, POTABLE 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Army NG MISSISSIPPI Pascagoula READINESS CENTER 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 Army NG MISSOURI Macon VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 9,100 9,100 9,100 9,100 Army NG MISSOURI Whiteman AFB AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Army NG NEW YORK New York READINESS CENTER ADD/ALT 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 Army NG OHIO Ravenna Army Ammunition Plant SANITARY SEWER 5,200 5,200 5,200 5,200 

Army NG PENNSYLVANIA Fort Indiantown Gap AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONAL BUILDING 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Army NG PUERTO RICO Camp Santiago MANEUVER AREA TRAINING & EQUIPMENT SITE 

ADDIT 

5,600 5,600 5,600 5,600 

Army NG SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville READINESS CENTER 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Army NG SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Army NG TEXAS Fort Worth ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER ADD 14,270 14,270 14,270 14,270 Army NG WYOMING Afton NATIONAL GUARD READINESS CENTER 10,200 10,200 10,200 10,200 Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 29,005 24,005 29,005 –5,000 24,005 

Army NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 12,240 12,240 12,240 12,240 

Total Military Construction, Army National Guard ....................................................................................................... 320,815 315,815 320,815 –5,000 315,815 

Army Res CALIFORNIA Camp Parks ARMY RESERVE CENTER 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 Army Res CALIFORNIA Fort Hunter Liggett TASS TRAINING CENTER (TTC) 16,500 16,500 16,500 16,500 Army Res MARYLAND Bowie ARMY RESERVE CENTER 25,500 25,500 25,500 25,500 Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst AUTOMATED MULTIPURPOSE MACHINE GUN (MPMG) 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 

Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst CENTRAL ISSUE FACILITY 7,900 7,900 7,900 7,900 

Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst CONSOLIDATED DINING FACILITY 13,400 13,400 13,400 13,400 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
911 

Army Res NEW JERSEY Joint Base McGuire-DixLakehurst MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE 5,400 5,400 5,400 5,400 

Army Res NEW YORK Bullville ARMY RESERVE CENTER 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 Army Res NORTH CAROLINA Fort Bragg ARMY RESERVE CENTER 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy ACCESS CONTROL POINT/MAIL/FREIGHT CENTER 17,500 17,500 17,500 17,500 Army Res WISCONSIN Fort McCoy NCO ACADEMY DINING FACILITY 5,900 5,900 5,900 5,900 Army Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 14,212 14,212 14,212 14,212 

Army Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,748 1,748 1,748 1,748 

Total Military Construction, Army Reserve .................................................................................................................. 174,060 174,060 174,060 0 174,060 

N/MC Res CALIFORNIA March AFB NOSC MORENO VALLEY RESERVE TRAINING CENTER 11,086 11,086 11,086 11,086 N/MC Res MISSOURI Kansas City RESERVE TRAINING CENTER—BELTON, MISSOURI 15,020 15,020 15,020 15,020 N/MC Res TENNESSEE Memphis RESERVE BOAT MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY 4,330 4,330 4,330 4,330 

N/MC Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MCNR PLANNING & DESIGN 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 

N/MC Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations USMCR PLANNING AND DESIGN 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 

Total Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Reserve ................................................................................... 32,976 32,976 32,976 0 32,976 

Air NG ALABAMA Birmingham IAP ADD TO AND ALTER DISTRIBUTED GROUND STATION 

F 

8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 

Air NG INDIANA Hulman Regional Airport ADD/ALTER BLDG 37 FOR DIST COMMON GROUND 

STA 

7,300 7,300 7,300 7,300 

Air NG MARYLAND Fort Meade 175TH NETWORK WARFARE SQUADRON FACILITY 4,000 0 4,000 4,000 Air NG MARYLAND Martin State Airport CYBER/ISR FACILITY 8,000 0 8,000 8,000 Air NG MONTANA Great Falls IAP INTRA-THEATER AIRLIFT CONVERSION 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Air NG NEW YORK Fort Drum MQ–9 FLIGHT TRAINING UNIT HANGAR 4,700 4,700 4,700 4,700 Air NG OHIO Springfield Beckley-Map ALTER INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS FACILITY 7,200 7,200 7,200 7,200 Air NG PENNSYLVANIA Fort Indiantown Gap COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS AND TRAINING 

FACILI 

7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 

Air NG RHODE ISLAND Quonset State Airport C–130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR TRAINING FACILITY 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Air NG TENNESSEE McGhee-Tyson Airport TEC EXPANSION- DORMITORY & CLASSROOM FACILITY 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
912 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions PLANNING AND DESIGN 13,400 13,400 13,400 13,400 

Air NG WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 

Total Military Construction, Air National Guard .......................................................................................................... 119,800 107,800 119,800 0 119,800 

AF Res CALIFORNIA March AFB JOINT REGIONAL DEPLOYMENT PROCESSING CENTER, 19,900 19,900 19,900 19,900 

AF Res FLORIDA Homestead AFS ENTRY CONTROL COMPLEX 9,800 9,800 9,800 9,800 AF Res OKLAHOMA Tinker AFB AIR CONTROL GROUP SQUADRON OPERATIONS 12,200 12,200 12,200 12,200 AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions PLANNING AND DESIGN 2,229 2,229 2,229 2,229 

AF Res WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Various Worldwide Loca- tions UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 1,530 1,530 1,530 1,530 

Total Military Construction, Air Force Reserve ........................................................................................................... 45,659 45,659 45,659 0 45,659 

FH Con Army WISCONSIN Fort McCoy FAMILY HOUSING NEW CONSTRUCTION (56 UNITS) 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 FH Con Army GERMANY South Camp Vilseck FAMILY HOUSING NEW CONSTRUCTION (29 UNITS) 16,600 16,600 0 16,600 FH Con Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FAMILY HOUSING P & D 4,408 4,408 4,408 4,408 

Total Family Housing Construction, Army .................................................................................................................... 44,008 44,008 27,408 0 44,008 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS 33,125 33,125 33,125 33,125 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASED HOUSING 180,924 180,924 180,924 180,924 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY FACILITIES 107,639 107,639 107,639 107,639 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 54,433 54,433 54,433 54,433 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
913 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MILITARY HOUSING PRIVITIZATION INITIATIVE 25,661 25,661 25,661 25,661 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MISCELLANEOUS 646 646 646 646 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SERVICES 13,536 13,536 13,536 13,536 

FH Ops Army WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES 96,907 96,907 96,907 96,907 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Army .............................................................................................. 512,871 512,871 512,871 0 512,871 

FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IMPROVEMENTS 72,093 72,093 72,093 72,093 

FH Con AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PLANNING AND DESIGN 4,267 4,267 4,267 4,267 

Total Family Housing Construction, Air Force ............................................................................................................. 76,360 76,360 76,360 0 76,360 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 39,470 39,470 39,470 39,470 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations HOUSING PRIVATIZATION 41,436 41,436 41,436 41,436 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASING 54,514 54,514 54,514 54,514 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE (RPMA RPMC) 110,786 110,786 110,786 110,786 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 53,044 53,044 53,044 53,044 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,954 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SERVICES ACCOUNT 16,862 16,862 16,862 16,862 

FH Ops AF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES ACCOUNT 70,532 70,532 70,532 70,532 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Air Force ....................................................................................... 388,598 388,598 388,598 0 388,598 

FH Con Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DESIGN 4,438 4,438 4,438 4,438 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
914 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

FH Con Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations IMPROVEMENTS 68,969 68,969 68,969 68,969 

Total Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps ..................................................................................... 73,407 73,407 73,407 0 73,407 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 21,073 21,073 21,073 21,073 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASING 74,962 74,962 74,962 74,962 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 90,122 90,122 90,122 90,122 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 60,782 60,782 60,782 60,782 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT 362 362 362 362 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COSTS 27,634 27,634 27,634 27,634 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SERVICES ACCOUNT 20,596 20,596 20,596 20,596 

FH Ops Navy WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES ACCOUNT 94,313 94,313 94,313 94,313 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Navy and Marine Corps ................................................................ 389,844 389,844 389,844 0 389,844 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 67 67 67 67 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 3,196 3,196 3,196 3,196 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT 20 20 20 20 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASING 10,994 10,994 10,994 10,994 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
915 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations LEASING 40,433 40,433 40,433 40,433 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 311 311 311 311 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY 74 74 74 74 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT 418 418 418 418 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations SERVICES ACCOUNT 32 32 32 32 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES ACCOUNT 12 12 12 12 

FH Ops DW WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations UTILITIES ACCOUNT 288 288 288 288 

Total Family Housing Operation & Maintenance, Defense-Wide ................................................................................ 55,845 55,845 55,845 0 55,845 

FHIF WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND 1,780 1,780 1,780 1,780 

Total DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund ............................................................................................................ 1,780 1,780 1,780 0 1,780 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Base Realignment & Clo- sure, Army BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE 180,401 180,401 180,401 180,401 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Base Realignment & Clo- sure, Navy BASE REALIGNMENT & CLOSURE 108,300 108,300 108,300 108,300 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DOD BRAC ACTIVITIES—AIR FORCE 126,376 126,376 126,376 126,376 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–100: PLANING, DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT 7,277 7,277 7,277 7,277 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–101: VARIOUS LOCATIONS 20,988 20,988 20,988 20,988 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–138: NAS BRUNSWICK, ME 993 993 993 993 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–157: MCSA KANSAS CITY, MO 40 40 40 40 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
916 

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Account State/ Country Installation Project Title FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–172: NWS SEAL BEACH, CONCORD, CA 5,766 5,766 5,766 5,766 

BRAC WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations DON–84: JRB WILLOW GROVE & CAMBRIA REG AP 1,216 1,216 1,216 1,216 

Total Base Realignment and Closure Account ............................................................................................................ 451,357 451,357 451,357 0 451,357 

PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—ANG UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 0 –45,623 0 0 

PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—ARMY BID SAVINGS 0 –14,000 0 0 

PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—ARMY PLANNING AND DE- SIGN FY12 0 –50,000 0 0 

PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—DEFENSE WIDE BID SAVINGS 0 –358,400 0 0 

PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—DEFENSE WIDE UNSPEC- IFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 0 –16,470 0 0 

PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—NAVY BID SAVINGS 0 –49,920 0 0 

PYS WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED Unspecified Worldwide Lo- cations PRIOR YEAR SAVINGS—SECTION 1013 OF THE DEMONSTRATION CITIES AND METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1966, AS AMENDED 0 –50,000 0 0 

Total Prior Year Savings ............................................................................................................................................... 0 –584,413 0 0 0 Total Military Construction ............................................................................................................................................ 11,011,633 10,055,563 9,662,342 –644,780 10,366,853 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
917 

TITLE XLVII—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL 

SECURITY PROGRAMS 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Discretionary Summary By Appropriation 

Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies Appropriation Summary: 

Energy Programs 

Electricity delivery and energy reliability ................................................................................... 16,000 –16,000 –16,000 –16,000 0 Nuclear Energy ........................................................................................................................... 94,000 0 0 0 94,000 

Atomic Energy Defense Activities 

National nuclear security administration: 

Weapons activities ............................................................................................................ 7,868,409 220,000 0 40,843 7,909,252 Defense nuclear nonproliferation ...................................................................................... 2,140,142 0 80,000 40,000 2,180,142 Naval reactors ................................................................................................................... 1,246,134 0 0 0 1,246,134 

Office of the administrator ............................................................................................... 397,784 –8,000 0 –8,000 389,784 

Total, National nuclear security administration ..................................................................... 11,652,469 212,000 80,000 72,843 11,725,312 Environmental and other defense activities: 

Defense environmental cleanup ........................................................................................ 5,316,909 –358,000 –80,000 –301,500 5,015,409 Other defense activities .................................................................................................... 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658 

Total, Environmental & other defense activities .................................................................... 6,065,989 –358,000 –80,000 –291,922 5,774,067 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
918 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities .......................................................................................... 17,718,458 –146,000 0 –219,079 17,499,379 

Total, Discretionary Funding ............................................................................................................................... 17,828,458 –162,000 –16,000 –235,079 17,593,379 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability 

Infrastructure security & energy restoration (HS) .............................................................................. 16,000 –16,000 –16,000 –16,000 0 

Nuclear Energy 

Idaho sitewide safeguards and security ..................................................................................................... 94,000 94,000 

Weapons Activities 

Life extension programs and major alterations 

B61 Life extension program ....................................................................................................... 537,044 44,000 537,044 W76 Life extension program ...................................................................................................... 235,382 9,700 9,700 245,082 W78/88–1 Life extension program ............................................................................................. 72,691 5,600 72,691 W88 ALT 370 .............................................................................................................................. 169,487 169,487 

Total, Stockpile assessment and design .......................................................................................... 1,014,604 59,300 0 9,700 1,024,304 Stockpile systems 

B61 Stockpile systems ............................................................................................................... 83,536 83,536 

W76 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 47,187 47,187 

W78 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 54,381 54,381 W80 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 50,330 50,330 B83 Stockpile systems ............................................................................................................... 54,948 6,000 54,948 

W87 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 101,506 101,506 

W88 Stockpile systems .............................................................................................................. 62,600 62,600 Stockpile systems 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
919 

Total, Stockpile systems .................................................................................................................... 454,488 6,000 0 0 454,488 Surveillance Weapons dismantlement and disposition 

Operations and maintenance ..................................................................................................... 49,264 6,000 55,264 

Stockpile services 

Production support ..................................................................................................................... 321,416 29,600 23,584 345,000 

Research and development support .......................................................................................... 26,349 3,200 26,349 

R&D certification and safety ..................................................................................................... 191,259 18,300 191,259 Management, technology, and production ................................................................................. 214,187 214,187 Plutonium sustainment .............................................................................................................. 156,949 9,500 156,949 

Total, Stockpile services ................................................................................................................... 910,160 60,600 0 23,584 933,744 

Total, Directed stockpile work ................................................................................................................... 2,428,516 125,900 0 39,284 2,467,800 Campaigns: 

Science campaign 

Advanced certification ............................................................................................................... 54,730 54,730 

Primary assessment technologies .............................................................................................. 109,231 109,231 

Dynamic materials properties .................................................................................................... 116,965 116,965 Advanced radiography ................................................................................................................ 30,509 30,509 

Secondary assessment technologies .......................................................................................... 86,467 86,467 

Total, Science campaign ................................................................................................................... 397,902 0 0 0 397,902 Engineering campaign 

Enhanced surety ......................................................................................................................... 51,771 2,500 51,771 

Weapon systems engineering assessment technology .............................................................. 23,727 23,727 Nuclear survivability .................................................................................................................. 19,504 19,504 Enhanced surveillance ............................................................................................................... 54,909 4,000 54,909 

Total, Engineering campaign ............................................................................................................. 149,911 6,500 0 0 149,911 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
920 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign 

Ignition ....................................................................................................................................... 80,245 80,245 Support of other stockpile programs ......................................................................................... 15,001 15,001 Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support ................................................................... 59,897 59,897 Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion ................................................................................. 5,024 5,024 Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas ....................................................... 8,198 8,198 Facility operations and target production ................................................................................. 232,678 232,678 

Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign ......................................................... 401,043 0 0 0 401,043 

Advanced simulation and computing campaign ................................................................................ 564,329 564,329 Technology Maturation Campaign Readiness Campaign 

Component manufacturing development ................................................................................... 106,085 106,085 Tritium readiness ....................................................................................................................... 91,695 91,695 

Total, Readiness campaign ............................................................................................................... 197,780 0 0 0 197,780 

Total, Campaigns ......................................................................................................................................... 1,710,965 6,500 0 0 1,710,965 

Nuclear programs 

Nuclear operations capability ............................................................................................................. 265,937 265,937 Capabilities based investments ......................................................................................................... 39,558 39,558 Construction: 

12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL ...................................................................................... 26,722 26,722 11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, LANL ........................................................... 30,679 30,679 07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility upgrade project, LANL ....................... 55,719 55,719 06–D–141 PED/Construction, Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project Y–12 ..................... 325,835 325,835 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
921 

Total, Construction ............................................................................................................................. 438,955 0 0 0 438,955 

Total, Nuclear programs ............................................................................................................................. 744,450 0 0 0 744,450 

Secure transportation asset 

Operations and equipment ................................................................................................................. 122,072 122,072 Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 97,118 97,118 

Total, Secure transportation asset ............................................................................................................ 219,190 0 0 0 219,190 

Site stewardship 

Nuclear materials integration ............................................................................................................. 17,679 17,679 Corporate project management .......................................................................................................... 13,017 13,017 Minority serving institution partnerships program ............................................................................. 14,531 14,531 Enterprise infrastructure 

Site Operations ........................................................................................................................... 1,112,455 1,112,455 

Site Support ............................................................................................................................... 109,561 109,561 

Sustainment ............................................................................................................................... 433,764 65,100 433,764 

Facilities disposition .................................................................................................................. 5,000 5,000 

Subtotal, Enterprise infrastructure ................................................................................................... 1,660,780 65,100 0 0 1,660,780 

Total, Site stewardship ............................................................................................................................... 1,706,007 65,100 0 0 1,706,007 Defense nuclear security 

Operations and maintenance .............................................................................................................. 664,981 664,981 Construction: 

14–D–710 DAF Argus, NNSS ..................................................................................................... 14,000 

Total, Defense nuclear security ................................................................................................................. 678,981 0 0 0 678,981 

NNSA CIO activities ...................................................................................................................................... 148,441 22,500 1,559 150,000 Legacy contractor pensions ......................................................................................................................... 279,597 279,597 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
922 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Subtotal, Weapons activities ............................................................................................................................... 7,916,147 220,000 0 40,843 7,956,990 

Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................. –47,738 –47,738 

Total, Adjustments ....................................................................................................................................... –47,738 0 0 0 –47,738 

Total, Weapons Activities .................................................................................................................................... 7,868,409 220,000 0 40,843 7,909,252 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs 

Global threat reduction initiative ....................................................................................................... 424,487 23,000 424,487 Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D 

Operations and maintenance ..................................................................................................... 388,838 388,838 

Nonproliferation and international security ........................................................................................ 141,675 141,675 International material protection and cooperation ............................................................................. 369,625 –23,000 369,625 Fissile materials disposition 

U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition 

Operations and maintenance 

U.S. plutonium disposition ....................................................................................... 157,557 157,557 U.S. uranium disposition ......................................................................................... 25,000 25,000 

Total, Operations and maintenance ................................................................................ 182,557 0 0 0 182,557 Construction: 

99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC ................... 320,000 80,000 40,000 360,000 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
923 

Total, Construction ........................................................................................................... 320,000 0 80,000 40,000 360,000 

Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition ..................................................................... 502,557 0 80,000 40,000 542,557 

Total, Fissile materials disposition ................................................................................................... 502,557 0 80,000 40,000 542,557 

Legacy contractor pensions ................................................................................................................ 93,703 93,703 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs ................................................................................. 1,920,885 0 80,000 41,559 1,962,444 

Nuclear counterterrorism incident response program ................................................................................. 181,293 181,293 Counterterrorism and counterproliferation programs .................................................................................. 74,666 74,666 Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ............................................................................................. 2,176,844 0 80,000 40,000 2,216,844 Adjustments 

Use of prior year balances ................................................................................................................. –36,702 –36,702 

Total, Adjustments ....................................................................................................................................... –36,702 0 0 0 –36,702 

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ............................................................................................................ 2,140,142 0 80,000 40,000 2,180,142 

Naval Reactors 

Naval reactors operations and infrastructure ............................................................................................. 455,740 –2,000 –2,000 –2,000 453,740 Naval reactors development ........................................................................................................................ 419,400 419,400 Ohio replacement reactor systems development ......................................................................................... 126,400 126,400 S8G Prototype refueling ............................................................................................................................... 144,400 144,400 Program direction ......................................................................................................................................... 44,404 44,404 Construction: 

14–D–902 KL Materials characterization laboratory expansion, KAPL .............................................. 1,000 1,000 14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF ........................................................... 45,400 45,400 13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL .................................................................. 21,073 21,073 13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, KSO ............................................................ 600 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,600 Naval Reactor Facility, ID ................................................................................................................... 1,700 1,700 

Total, Construction ...................................................................................................................................... 69,773 2,000 2,000 2,000 71,773 

Subtotal, Naval Reactors ..................................................................................................................................... 1,260,117 0 0 0 1,260,117 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
924 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Adjustments: 

Use of prior year balances (Naval reactors) ...................................................................................... –13,983 –13,983 

Total, Naval Reactors .......................................................................................................................................... 1,246,134 0 0 0 1,246,134 

Office Of The Administrator 

Office of the administrator .......................................................................................................................... 397,784 –8,000 –8,000 389,784 

Total, Office Of The Administrator ...................................................................................................................... 397,784 –8,000 0 –8,000 389,784 Defense Environmental Cleanup 

Closure sites: 

Closure sites administration ............................................................................................................... 4,702 4,702 

Hanford site: 

River corridor and other cleanup operations ...................................................................................... 393,634 20,000 15,000 408,634 Central plateau remediation ............................................................................................................... 513,450 513,450 Richland community and regulatory support ..................................................................................... 14,701 14,701 

Total, Hanford site ...................................................................................................................................... 921,785 0 20,000 15,000 936,785 

Idaho National Laboratory: 

Idaho cleanup and waste disposition ................................................................................................ 362,100 30,000 10,500 372,600 Idaho community and regulatory support .......................................................................................... 2,910 2,910 

Total, Idaho National Laboratory ............................................................................................................... 365,010 0 30,000 10,500 375,510 NNSA sites 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
925 

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ............................................................................................ 1,476 1,476 Nuclear facility D & D Separations Process Research Unit .............................................................. 23,700 23,700 Nevada ................................................................................................................................................ 61,897 61,897 Sandia National Laboratories ............................................................................................................. 2,814 2,814 Los Alamos National Laboratory ......................................................................................................... 219,789 40,000 15,000 234,789 

Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites ..................................................................................................... 309,676 0 40,000 15,000 324,676 

Oak Ridge Reservation: 

OR Nuclear facility D & D .................................................................................................................. 73,716 73,716 OR cleanup and disposition ............................................................................................................... 115,855 10,000 115,855 OR reservation community and regulatory support ............................................................................ 4,365 4,365 

Total, Oak Ridge Reservation ..................................................................................................................... 193,936 0 10,000 0 193,936 

Office of River Protection: 

Waste treatment and immobilization plant 

01–D–416 A–E/ORP–0060 / Major construction ....................................................................... 690,000 690,000 

Tank farm activities 

Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition ................................................................ 520,216 50,000 520,216 

Total, Office of River protection ................................................................................................................ 1,210,216 0 50,000 0 1,210,216 Savannah River sites: 

Savannah River risk management operations ................................................................................... 432,491 432,491 SR community and regulatory support ............................................................................................... 11,210 11,210 Radioactive liquid tank waste: 

Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition .................................................... 552,560 95,000 150,000 105,000 657,560 Construction: 

05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River ............................................ 92,000 92,000 

Total, Construction .................................................................................................................... 92,000 0 0 0 92,000 

Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste ................................................................................................ 644,560 95,000 150,000 105,000 749,560 

Total, Savannah River site ......................................................................................................................... 1,088,261 95,000 150,000 105,000 1,193,261 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
926 

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 

(In Thousands of Dollars) 

Program FY 2014 Request House Authorized Senate Authorized Agreement Change Agreement Authorized 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 

Waste isolation pilot plant ................................................................................................................. 203,390 33,000 16,000 219,390 

Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant .............................................................................................................. 203,390 0 33,000 16,000 219,390 

Program direction ......................................................................................................................................... 280,784 20,000 280,784 Program support .......................................................................................................................................... 17,979 17,979 Safeguards and Security: 

Oak Ridge Reservation ........................................................................................................................ 18,800 18,800 

Paducah .............................................................................................................................................. 9,435 9,435 

Portsmouth .......................................................................................................................................... 8,578 8,578 Richland/Hanford Site ......................................................................................................................... 69,078 10,000 69,078 

Savannah River Site ........................................................................................................................... 121,196 10,000 121,196 

Waste Isolation Pilot Project ............................................................................................................... 4,977 4,977 West Valley .......................................................................................................................................... 2,015 2,015 

Technology development .............................................................................................................................. 24,091 10,000 10,000 24,091 

Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup ......................................................................................................... 4,853,909 105,000 383,000 161,500 5,015,409 

Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution ............................................................................................... 463,000 –463,000 –463,000 –463,000 0 

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup ............................................................................................................... 5,316,909 –358,000 –80,000 –301,500 5,015,409 Other Defense Activities 

Health, safety and security 

Health, safety and security ................................................................................................................. 143,616 143,616 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
927 

Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 108,301 108,301 

Total, Health, safety and security ............................................................................................................. 251,917 0 0 0 251,917 Specialized security activities ...................................................................................................................... 196,322 9,578 205,900 Office of Legacy Management 

Legacy management ........................................................................................................................... 163,271 163,271 Program direction ................................................................................................................................ 13,712 13,712 

Total, Office of Legacy Management ......................................................................................................... 176,983 0 0 0 176,983 Defense-related activities Defense related administrative support 

Chief financial officer ......................................................................................................................... 38,979 38,979 Chief information officer ..................................................................................................................... 79,857 79,857 

Total, Defense related administrative support ......................................................................................... 118,836 0 0 0 118,836 

Office of hearings and appeals ................................................................................................................... 5,022 5,022 

Subtotal, Other defense activities ...................................................................................................................... 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658 Total, Other Defense Activities ........................................................................................................................... 749,080 0 0 9,578 758,658 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING
928 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with HEARING