T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e B a rryT e d M os kow i t z , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f or ** * the S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof C a l i f orni a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C L I F F O R D C H E W, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. G U Y H A L L , W ar den, T R C I, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 35801 D. C . No . 6 : 0 7 - c v - 0 1 3 3 0 - AA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon A nn L . A i ke n, C hi e f

D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r9, 2010 ** S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on Be f o r e : O’ SC AN NLAI N a n d TALL M AN , Ci r c u i tJ u d g e s , a n dM OSKO W I TZ , D i stri ctJudg e. *** 

# FI LED DE C 16 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

C h e w c la im s th a t th e tr ia l c o u rt v io la te dh is S ix th A m e n d m e n t r ig h ts w h e n it ap p o in te dE a r l W o o d s to a d v is e h is b r o th e rR o d n e yb e f o r e R o d n e yte s tif

ie d . H o w e v e r , C h e w d idn o t o b je c t to th e c o u rt’s d e c is io n a t tr ia l, a n dh e d idn o t f a ir ly pr e s e nthi s c l a i m of

tr i a l c ourte rr oron di r e c tappe a l t o the O r e gon C ourtof A ppe a l s orthe O r e gon S upr e m e C ourt . H e f a i l e d t o r e f

e r e nc e f e de r a l l a w orthe U n i t ed S t at es C o n st i tu t i o n i n h i s B al f ourbr i e f , a nd he c i t e d no c a s e s i n s upportof h is c la im th a t w o u ldh a v e a le rte d th o s e c o u rts to th e f e d e r a l n a tu r e o f

h is c la im . Se e Fi e lds v . W

addi ngton , 40 1 F . 3d 10 18 , 10 21 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). O re go n l aw th e r e f o r e b a rr e d C h e w f

r o m b r in g in g th is c la im o f tr ia l c o u rt e rr o rin s ta te p o s tc o n v ic tio n r e v ie w p r o c e e d in g s . Se e P a lm e rv . S ta te , 86 7 P . 2d 13 68 , 13 73 (O r. 1 9 9 4 ) . B e c au s e C h e w w a s p r o c e d u r a llyb a rr e df r o m r a is in g th e is s u e in s ta te p o s tc o n v ic tio n r e v ie w , h is f e d e r a l c la im is lik e w is e p r o c e d u r a llyd e f au lte d . C ol em an v. T hom ps on , 501 U . S . 722, 728–29 ( 1991) . C he w ha s notde m ons tr a t e d c aus e f or th e d e f au lt o ra c tu a l p r e

ju d ic e a s ar e s u lt o f

th e a lle g e dv io la tio n o f f e d e r a l la w . I

d. a t750. N orha s C he w s how n tha t“ f a i l ur e t o c ons i de rthe c l a i m s w oul d r e s ul ti n a fund am ent al m i sc arri age of j ust i ce . ” I d. I n s o f a ra s C h e w c la im s th a t W o o d s v io la te dh is S ix th A m e n d m e n t r ig h t to c o n f lic t- f r e e c o u n s e l b ya d v is in g R o d n e y , C h e w f a ils to s ta te av iab le S ix th3

A m e n d m e n t c la im . Mi c ke ns v . T ay lor , 535 U . S . 162, 174 ( 2002) . W oods di d not re pres entC hew attri al , and h ad no tre pres ent ed C hew for the si x w ee ks before tri al . T h erefo re, C h ew can n o tp o ssi b l y sh o w th atan “ actu al co n fl i cto f i n t erest advers el y a ff

ec t edh is la w

yer’s perf

orm ance . ” C uy le rv . Sul l i v an , 446 U . S . 335, 34 9 (19 80 ) ( em ph as i s a dd ed). AFFI RM ED