# Patent

## Title
Microbicide substances

## Abstract

The present application relates to biocidal substances comprising at least one isothiazolinone from the group consisting of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT) and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MIT), and at least one N-alkyl-guanidinium salt, methods for the production thereof, and their use for protecting technical materials and products which can be attacked by microorganisms.

## Background
The present application relates to biocidal substances comprising at least one isothiazolinone from the group consisting of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT) and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MIT), and at least one N-alkyl-guanidinium salt, to methods for the production thereof, and to their use for protecting technical materials and products which can be attacked by microorganisms.
N-alkylguanidine salts have good bactericidal effectiveness, good rate of action and are very readily soluble in water. However, the use of relatively large amounts of N-alkyl-guanidinium salts may lead to foaming, which hinders the use or makes it impossible. Furthermore, in practice very high dosage amounts may be necessary in some cases to achieve satisfactory results. Furthermore, the high solubility in water can be disadvantageous for exterior applications since weathering rapidly leads to them being washed out.
From U.S. Pat. No. 4,661,503 synergistic mixtures of dodecylguanidinium hydrochloroide with a mixture of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (CMIT) and MIT in a weight ratio of about 3 to 1, which are said to have a good effect against bacteria and fungi. However, it is desirable to further improve such mixtures.
BIT and its salts, such as in particular its sodium, potassium and lithium salts, are active ingredients that have been used in practice for a long time for producing microbicidally effective formulations. BIT is notable for good chemical and thermal stability and in principle has a broad antimicrobial effect (bacteria, fungi, yeasts). However, the efficacy against certain types of bacteria is not always satisfactory and the observed rate of action is often insufficient for avoiding microbiologically induced material damage.
To improve the efficacy and efficiency of BIT, it is known for example from EP 1 005 271 A1 to add MIT and optionally further biocides such as, for example, formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing substances.
However, an improvement in the activity spectrum, the rate of action or the amount of biocides to be used overall is also desirable for such mixtures.
Biocidal substances have been found which comprise

    
    
        (a) at least one isothiazolinone from the group consisting of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one
        and
        (b) at least one N-alkyl-guanidinium salt,
        where, if the biocidal substances comprises only 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one as component (a), the biocidal substance furthermore comprises either
        
            no 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one or
            comprises 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, where then the weight ratio of 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one to 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one is at least 0.35:1, preferably at least 1:1, such as, for example, 1:1 to 1000:1, particularly preferably at least 2:1, such as, for example, 2:1 to 1000:1, very particularly preferably at least 10:1, such as, for example, 10:1 to 1000:1 and yet further preferably at least 50:1, such as, for example, 50:1 to 1000:1.
        
        
    
    


Besides the specified ranges and preferred ranges of formulae and parameters, the scope of the invention also includes any desired combinations thereof, even if they are not explicitly listed in their entirety below for practical reasons.
The mixtures according to the invention have a strong effect against microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, yeast and algae and can be used for protecting technical materials against attack and destruction by microorganisms.
According to the invention, N-alkyl-guanidinium salts are understood as meaning compounds which have at least one guanidinium group or biguanide group, which have an alkyl radical on at least one of their nitrogen atoms, or compounds in which, in each case two groups selected from guanidinium groups and biguanide groups, are linked via at least in each case one of their nitrogen atoms via an alkylene radical. Examples of compounds of the latter type include chlorohexidine and polyhexanide.
Preferred N-alkyl-guanidinium salts are those of formula (I)

[H2N—(C═NH2)—NH—R]+X−  (I)

    
    
        in which R is a C8-C18 alkyl radical and X− is a monovalent anion or 1/p equivalents of a p-valent anion, where p is a natural number of 2 or more.
        R is preferably n-dodecyl,
        X− is preferably formate, acetate, nitrate, halide such as, for example, chloride or bromide.
    
    


Particularly preferred compounds of formula (I) are n-dodecylguanidinium acetate and n-dodecylguanidinium chloride.
Preferred biocidal substances comprise, as component (a), 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one.
The relative ratios of components (a) and (b) can be varied in the mixtures according to the invention over a wide range.
For example, the weight ratio of components (a) and (b) to one another is for example 10:1 to 1:10, preferably 5:1 to 1:5 and particularly preferably 2:1 to 1:5.
If BIT and MIT are used as component (a), their weight ratio is for example 1:100 to 100:1 preferably 3:1 to 1:3 and particularly preferably 1.5:1 to 1:2.5.
The substances according to the invention are exceptionally suitable as preservatives for technical materials. The term “technical materials” includes in general, but without limitation thereto, the following materials and products:

    
    
        paints, inks, plasters and other coating compositions
        starch solutions and slurries or other products produced on the basis of starch, such as e.g. printing thickeners
        slurries of other raw materials such as color pigments (e.g. iron oxide pigments, carbon black pigments, titanium dioxide pigments) or slurries of inorganic fillers and pigments such as kaolin, calcium carbonate, gypsum, bentonite, magnesium silicate, smectite or talc,
        construction chemical products such as concrete additives, for example based on molasses, lignosulfonate or polyacrylates, bitumen emulsions or joint sealants
        glues or adhesives based on known animal, vegetable or synthetic raw materials
        polymer dispersions based on e.g. polyacrylate, polystyrene acrylate, styrene butadiene, polyvinyl acetate, etc.
        detergents and cleaners for industrial and household use
        mineral oils and mineral oil products (such as e.g. diesel fuels)
        cooling lubricants for metal working based on mineral oil-containing, semisynthetic or synthetic concentrates
        auxiliaries for the leather, textile or photochemical industry
        preproducts and intermediates of the chemical industry, e.g. during dye production and storage
        inks or washes
        wax and clay emulsions.
    
    


Preferably, the technical materials are:

    
    
        starch solutions and slurries or other products produced on the basis of starch such as e.g. printing thickeners
        slurries of other raw materials such as colored pigments (e.g. iron oxide pigments, carbon black pigments, titanium dioxide pigments) or slurries or inorganic fillers and pigments such as kaolin, calcium carbonate, gypsum, bentonite, magnesium silicate, smectite or talc.
    
    


Particularly preferably, the technical materials are:

    
    
        slurries of inorganic fillers and pigments such as kaolin, calcium carbonate, gypsum, bentonite, magnesium silicate, smectite or talc, with slurries of calcium carbonate being yet further preferred.
    
    


The substances according to the invention can be used particularly efficiently in a method for protecting technical materials against infestation with and/or destruction by microorganisms. They are especially effective against bacteria, fungi and slime organisms. By way of example, mention may be made of the following microorganisms:
Bacteria:
Alcaligenes such as Alcaligenes faecalis, Bacillus such as Bacillus subtilis, Citrobacter such as Citrobacter freundii, Corynebacterium such as Corynebacterium ammoniagenes, Enterobacter such as Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterococcus such as Enterococcus hirae, Escherichia such as Escherichia coli, Proteus such as Proteus hauseri, Pseudomonas such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens or Pseudomonas stutzeri, Salmonella such as Salmonella enterica, Staphylococcus such as Staphylococcus aureus; 
Fungi:
Acremonium such as Acremonium stricturn, Alternaria such as Alternaria tenuis or Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus such as Aspergillus niger or Aspergillus brasiliensis, Candida such as Candida albicans, Chaetomium such as Chaetoinium globosum, Fusarium such as Fusarium solani, Geotrichum such as Geotrichum candiduria, Lentinus such as Lentinus tigrinus, Penicillium such as Penicillium glaucum or Penicillium pinophilum, Rhodotorula such as Rhodotorula rubra or Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Stachybotrys such as Stachybotrys chartanim, Trichoderma such as Trichoderma virens. 
The mixtures according to the invention can comprise, as component c), additionally either no, one or more further biocidal active ingredients. For example, these further biocidal active ingredients can be selected from the group consisting of bronopol, benzylhemiformal, trimethylene-2-methylisothiazolinon-3-one, N-methyylbenzisothiazolinone, 2-n-ortylisothiazolin-3-one, tetramethylolacetylenediurea (TMAD), 1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione (DMDMH), p-chloro-m-cresol, dimethyiolurea, 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane, 2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilopropioriamide, glutardialdehyde, ethylene glycol hemiformal, ethylene glycol bis-hemiformal, N-methylolurea, thiabendazole, carbendazim, zinc pyrithione, sodium pyrithione, 2-phenoxyethanol, phenoxypropariol, o-phenylphenol, chlorophene and quaternary ammonium salts, such as e.g. N-alkyl-N,N-dimethyibenzylammonium chloroide, and CMIT with the limitations mentioned at the start.
The application concentrations of the substances according to invention and the ratio of components (a) and (b) and the optionally present further active ingredients is governed by the type and occurrence of the microorganisms to be controlled, the microbial starting load, and also by the composition of the material to be protected. The optimum use amount for a specific application can be easily ascertained prior to use in practice by test series in the laboratory in a manner sufficiently known to the person skilled in the art.
Furthermore, the invention also encompasses the technical materials treated with the substances according to the invention.
In general, in total 2 to 50 000 ppm of components (a) and (b), preferably 5 to 5000 ppm, particularly preferably 10 to 2000 ppm and particularly preferably 200 to 1000 ppm, are present in the technical material for preservation. The invention therefore also encompasses technical materials which have been treated with substances according to the invention, or in another embodiment comprise the aforementioned amounts of components (a) and (b).
In the substances according to the invention, the sum of components (a) and (b) can be varied within a broad range. In general, the sum of components (a) and (b) is 1 to 80% by weight, preferably 2 to 70% by weight and particularly preferably 4 to 50% by weight, based on the total weight of the substances according to the invention.
The fraction of further active ingredients optionally used in the substances according to the invention as component (c) can vary within a wide range and depends heavily on the nature of the active ingredient and medium to be protected. In general, it can be between 0.2 and 20% by weight, preferably between 0.5 and 10% by weight and particularly preferably between 0.5 and 5% by weight, based on the total weight of the concentrates or formulations.
In further aspects, the invention encompasses the use, independent in each case, of MIT or BIT or N-alkyl-guanidinium salts for producing the substances according to the invention or technical materials.
The substances according to the invention can, depending on their particular physical and/or chemical properties, either be used separately in the form of a metered addition of the individual active ingredient to the technical material to be protected, in which case an individual adjustment of the concentration ratio can be performed depending on the requirements of the preservation problem to be solved, or the metered addition of a finished biocidal substance comprising components (a) and (b) can take place.
The formulation of the substances according to the invention is arbitrary and can take place for example in the form of solutions, emulsions, suspensions, powders, foams, pastes, granules, aerosols and microencapsulations in polymeric substances.
The substances according to the invention may therefore in each case further comprise or not comprise:

    
    
        Interface-active substances, such as, for example, surfactants. Surfactants can be, for example, nonionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants, preferably anionic surfactants. Suitable anionic surfactants are, for example, alkyl sulfates, alkyl ether sulfates, alkylaryl sulfonates, alkyl succinates, alkyl sulfosuccinates, N-alkoylsarcosinates, acyl taurates, acyl isethionates, alkyl phosphates, alkyl ether phosphates, alkyl ether carboxylates, alpha-olefinsulfonates, in particular the alkali metal and alkaline earth metal salts, e.g. sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and also ammonium and triethanolamine salts. The alkyl ether sulfates, alkyl ether phosphates and alkyl ether carboxylates can in each case have for example between 1 and 10 ethylene oxide or propylene oxide units, preferably 1 to 3 ethylene oxide units. Of suitability are, for example, sodium lauryl sulfate, ammonium lauryl sulfate, sodium lauryl ether sulfate, ammonium lauryl ether sulfate, sodium lauryl sarcosinate, sodium oleyl succinate, ammonium lauryl salfosuccinate, sodium dodecylhenzenesulfonate, triethanolamine dodecylbenzenesulfonate.
        Wetting agents, such as, for example, alkali metal salts, alkaline earth metal salts, ammonium salts of aromatic sulfonic acids, e.g. ligno-, phenol-, naphthalene- and dibutylnaphthalenesulfonic acid, and also of fatty acids, alkyl- and alkylarylsulfonates, alkyl, lauryl ether and fatty alcohol sulfates, and also salts of sulfated hexa-, hepta- and octaderanols or fatty alcohol glycol ethers, condensation products of sulfonated naphthalene and its derivatives with formaldehyde, condensation products of naphthalene or of naphthalenesulfonic acids with phenol and formaldehyde, polyoxyethylene octyl phenol ether, ethoxylated isooctyl-, octyl- or nonylphenol, alkylphenol or tributylphenyl polyglycol ether, alkylayl polyether alcohols, isotridecyl alcohol, fatty alcohol ethylene oxide condensates, ethoxylated castor oil, polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers or polyoxypropylene, lauryl alcohol polyglycol ether acetate, sorbital esters, ligno sulfite waste liquors or methylcellulose.
        Emulsifiers, such as, for example, sodium, potassium and ammonium salts of straight-chain aliphatic carboxylic acids of chain length C12-C20, sodium hydroxyoctadecanesulfonate, sodium, potassium and ammonium salts of hydroxy fatty acids of chain length C12-C20 and sulfation or acetylation products thereof, alkyl sulfates, also as triethanolamine salts, alkyl-(C10-C20)-sulfonates, alkyl(C10-C20)-arylsulfonates, dimethyldialkyl(C8-C18)-ammonium chloride, acyl, alkyl, oleyl and alkylaryl oxethylates and their sulfation products, alkali metal salts of the sulfosuccinic acid esters with aliphatic saturated monohydric alcohols of chain length C4-C16, sulfosuccinic acid 4-esters with polyethylene glycol ethers of monohydric aliphatic alcohols of chain length C10-C12 (disodium salt), sulfosuccinic acid 4-esters with polyethylene glycol nonylphenyl ether (disodium salt), sulfosuccinic acid bis-cyclohexylester (sodium salt), lignosulfonic acid, and calcium, magnesium, sodium and ammonium salts thereof, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate with 20 ethylene oxide groups, resin acids, hydrogenated and dehydrogenated resin acids, and alkali metal salts thereof, dodecylated diphenyl ether disulfonic acid sodium, and copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide with a minimum content of 10% by weight of ethylene oxide. Preferably, the emulsifiers used are: sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium lauryl ether sulfate, ethoxylated (3 ethylene oxide groups); the polyethylene glycol (4-20) ethers of oleyl alcohol, and the polyethene oxide-(4-14) ethers of nonylphenol.
        Dispersants, such as, for example, alkylphenol polyglycol ethers.
        Stabilizers, such as, e.g. cellulose and cellulose derivatives.
        Adhesives and thickeners, such as carboxymethylcellulose, natural and synthetic pulverulent, granular or latex-like polymers are used, such as gum arabic, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, and natural phospholipids, such as cephalins and lecithins and synthetic phospholipid, and mineral or vegetable oils.
        Spreading agents, such as, for example, isopropyl myristate, polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether and polyoxyethylene lauryl phenyl ether.
        Organic solvents, such as, for example, mono- or polyhydric alcohols, esters, ketones and hydrocarbons. Examples of suitable solvents are paraffins, e.g. petroleum fractions, mineral and vegetable oils, butanol or glycol, and ethers and esters thereof, ketones such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone or cyclohexanone.
        Fragrances and dyes, such as inorganic pigments, e.g. iron oxide, titanium oxide, Prussian blue and organic dyes, such as alizarin, azo and metallophthalocyanine dyes and trace nutrients such as salts of iron, manganese, boron, copper, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc.
        Dedusting agents, such as, for example, polyglycols and polyglycol ethers. The at least essentially solid formulations here can comprise, for example, in each case 0.01 to 2, preferably 0.05 to 1, particularly preferably 0.1 to 0.5% by weight, of dedusting agents.
        Buffer substances, buffer systems or pH regulators. The at least essentially solid formulations can here comprise for example in each case 0.01 to 10, preferably 0.1 to 5, % by weight of buffer substances, buffer systems or pH regulators.
        Solid carriers such as, for example, natural stone flours, such as kaolins, clay earths, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite or diatomerous earths, as well as synthetic stone flours, such as highly dispersed silica, aluminum oxide and silicates;
        Examples of suitable solid carriers especially for granules are: broken and fractionated natural stones such as calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite, dolomite, and synthetic granules made of inorganic and organic flours, and also granules made of organic materials such as saw dust, coconut shells, corn cobs and tobacco stems;
        water
    
    


The particular advantage of the invention lies in the provision of unusually highly effective predominantly synergistic biocidal substances with a broad activity spectrum and high rate of action which are significantly increased compared to combinations of BIT and MIT alone.


EXAMPLES
The growth of bacteria and fungi upon the addition of different biocidal mixtures was tested. The concentration above which growth is no longer detected is given as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The precultivation of the bacteria which were used in the test was performed on tryptone soya agar. The precultivation of the fungi which were used in the test was performed on malt extract agar. The growth in the MIC tests was checked in tryptone soya broth (bacteria) or malt extract Bouillon (fungi). The organisms were incubated at 26° C. and a relative broth humidity of 70 to 80%. The bacteria were evaluated after 4 days, and the fungi were evaluated atmospheric after 7 days.
The synergistic index (SI) was determined in accordance with the method described by Kull et al. (F. C. Kull et al., Applied Microbiology 9 (1961), 538-541).
The following equation applies here: SI=QA/Qa+QB/Qb




  
    
      Qa
      ×
      
        
          MIC
          ⁡
          
            (
            
              A
              +
              B
            
            )
          
        
        
          MIC
          ⁡
          
            (
            A
            )
          
        
      
    
    ⊕
    
      Qb
      ×
      
        
          MIC
          ⁡
          
            (
            
              A
              +
              B
            
            )
          
        
        
          MIC
          ⁡
          
            (
            B
            )
          
        
      
    
  
  =
  SI




Qa=fraction of substance A
Qb=fraction of substance B
MIC(A)=concentration of substance A which suppresses germ growth
MIC(B)=concentration of substance B which suppresses germ growth
MIC(A+B)=concentration of A+B which suppresses germ growth
If SI has a value above 1, this means that an antagonism is present.
If SI assumes the value 1, this means that an addition of the effect is present.
If SI assumes of below 1, this means that a synergism exists.
Example 1
The effect of an active ingredient combination of BIT and MIT in the weight ratio of 1:1 and varying amounts of dodecylguanidine hydrochloride (DGH, data likewise refer to weight ratios) was tested.
Table 1: gives the MIC values for various bacteria
Table 2: gives the synergy indices calculated for the results according to table 1
Table 3: gives the MIC values for various fungi
Table 4: gives the synergy indices calculated for the results according to table 3













TABLE 1






BIT:MIT







Strain
(1:1)
1:1
2:3
1:4
1:9
DGH





















Bacillus subtilis
10
5
5
2.5
5
5


Citrobacter freundii
25
10
10
5
10
10


Corynebacterium
62.5
5
5
2.5
5
5


ammoniagenes








Enterococcus hirae
25
5
5
1.75
5
5


Pseudomonas aeruginosa
25
25
25
25
25
50


Staphylococcus aureus
25
2.5
1
1
2.5
2.5




















TABLE 2





Strain
1:1
2:3
1:4
1:9







Bacillus subtilis
0.75
0.80
0.45
0.95 


Citrobacter freundii
0.70
0.76
0.44
0.94


Corynebacterium ammoniagenes
0.54
0.63
0.41
0.91


Enterococcus hirae
0.60
0.68
0.29
0.92


Pseudomonas aeruginosa
0.75
0.70
0.60
0.55


Staphylococcus aureus
0.55
0.26
0.33
0.91
























TABLE 3






BIT:MIT









Strain
(1:1)
9:1
4:1
1.1
2:3
1:4
1:9
DGH























Acremonium strictum
25
10
7.5
2.5
1
1
2.5
5


Alternaria alternata
25
10
7.5
7.5
2.5
2.5
5
5


Candida albicans
50
25
25
25
25
10
25
25


Fusarium solani
62.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
25
37.5
37.5
50


Geotrichum candidum
50
37.5
25
25
25
10
25
25


Penicillium pinophilum
175
50
50
17.5
10
10
17.5
17.5


Rhodotorula mucilaginosa
50
25
25
25
25
10
25
25


Stachybotrys chartarum
50
50
25
25
25
10
25
25


Trichoderma virens
175
25
37.5
25
25
25
10
37.5






















TABLE 4





Strain
9:1
4:1
1:1
2:3
1:4
1:9







Acremonium strictum
0.56
0.54
0.30
0.14
0.17
0.46


Alternaria alternata
0.56
0.54
0.90
0.34
0.42
0.92


Candida albicans
0.55
0.60
0.75
0.80
0.36
0.95


Fusarium solani
0.62
0.63
0.68
0.46
0.72
0.74


Geotrichum candidum
0.83
0.60
0.75
0.80
0.36
0.95


Penicillium pinophilum
0.54
0.80
0.55
0.37
0.47
0.91


Rhodotorula mucilaginosa
0.55
0.60
0.75
0.80
0.36
0.95


Stachybotrys chartarum
1.10
0.60
0.75
0.80
0.36
0.95


Trichoderma virens
0.20
0.37
0.40
0.46
0.56
0.92









Example 2
The effect of an active ingredient combination of BIT and MIT in the weight ratio of 1:2 and varying amounts of dodecylguanidine hydrochloride (DGH, data likewise refer to weight ratios) was tested.
Table 5: gives the MIC values for various bacteria
Table 6: gives the synergy indices calculated for the results according to table 5
Table 7: gives the MIC values and synergy indices for various bacteria
Table 8: gives the MIC values for various fungi
Table 9: gives the synergy indices calculated for the results according to table 8
Table 10: gives the MIC values and synergy indices for various fungi













TABLE 5






BIT:MIT







Strain
(1:2)
3:2
1:1
1:4
1:9
DGH





















Corynebacterium
25
5
5
5
2.5
5


ammoniagenes








Enterobacter aerogenes
37.5
10
10
10
10
10


Enterococcus hirae
25
5
5
5
3.75
5


Proteus hauseri
10
5
5
10
10
10




















TABLE 6





Strain
3:2
1:1
1:4
1:9







Corynebacterium ammoniagenes
0.52
0.60
0.84
0.46


Enterobacter aerogenes
0.56
0.63
0.85
0.93


Enterococcus hirae
0.52
0.60
0.84
0.69


Proteus hauseri
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00



















TABLE 7









MIC [ppm]













BIT/MIT
(BIT/MIT




Strain
(1:2)
(1:2)):DGH (4:1)
DGH
SI














Alcaligenes faecalis
5
5
10
0.90


Bacillus subtilis
10
5
2.5
0.80


Citrobacter freundii
17.5
10
5
0.86


Staphylococcus aureus
25
2.5
1
0.58
























TABLE 8






BIT:MIT









Strain
(1:2)
9:1
4:1
3:2
1:1
2:3
1:4
DGH























Acremonium
25
10
5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5


strictum










Alternaria
37.5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5


alternata










Aspergillus
250
75
75
82.5
25
50
37.5
37.5


brasiliensis










Aureoba-
25
17.5
10
5
5
5
5
5


sidium










pullulans










Candida
50
25
25
25
25
25
25
25


albicans










Chaetomium
250
75
50
50
50
*
25
25


globosum










Fusarium
50
25
25
17.5
10
25
25
25


solani










Rhodotorula
50
25
25
10
10
10
25
25


mucilaginosa










Trichoderma
250
50
50
50
25
25
25
25


virens





* not determined



















TABLE 9





Strain
9:1
4:1
3:2
1:1
2:3
1:4







Acremonium strictum
0.76
0.56
0.46
0.55
0.64
0.82


Alternaria alternata
0.44
0.31
0.48
0.57
0.65
0.83


Aspergillus brasiliensis
0.47
0.64
1.08
0.38
0.88
0.83


Aureobasidium pullulans
0.98
0.72
0.52
0.60
0.68
0.84


Candida albicans
0.55
0.60
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.90


Chaetomium globosum
0.57
0.56
0.92
1.10
*
0.82


Fusarium solani
0.55
0.60
0.49
0.30
0.80
0.90


Rhodotorula mucilaginosa
0.55
0.60
0.28
0.30
0.32
0.90


Trichoderma virens
0.38
0.56
0.92
0.55
0.64
0.82





* not determined
















TABLE 10









MIC [ppm]













BIT/MIT

(BIT/MIT



Strain
(1:2)
DHG
(1:2)):DGH (1:1)
SI














Stachybotrys chartarum
50
7.5
10
0.77


Paecilomyces formosus
10
5
7.5
0.79


Geotrichum candidum
50
10
10
0.60


Penicillium pinophilum
75
7.5
10
0.73









The above tables 1-10 clearly show that for three-component mixtures according to the invention of BIT, MIT and DGH in various mixing ratios, a marked synergism against various bacteria and fungi is present.
Example 3
The effect of an active ingredient combination BIT and dodecylguanidine hydrochloride (DGH, data likewise refer to weight ratios) in various weight ratios was tested.

    
    
        Table 11: shows the MIC values and synergy indices for various fungi at a BIT to DGH weight ratio of 3:2
        Table 11 shows the MIC values and synergy indices for various bacteria
        Table 13: shows the synergy indices calculated for the results according to table 12
        Table 14: shows the MIC values as synergy indices for Staphylococcus aureus at various BIT to DGH weight ratios
        Table 15: shows the MIC values and synergy indices for various fungi
        Table 16: shows the synergy indices calculated for the results according to table 15
        Table 17: shows the MIC values and synergy indices for Candida albicans at various BIT to DGH weight ratios
    
    












TABLE 11









MIC [ppm]














BIT:DGH




Strain
BIT
(3:2)
DGH
SI














Alcaligenes faecalis
2.5
2.5
10
0.70


Bacillus subtilis
5
2.5
3.75
0.56


Citrobacter freundii
10
5
5
0.70


Corynebacterium ammoniagenes
37.5
2.5
2.5
0.44


Enterobacter aerogenes
25
10
10
0.64


Enterococcus hirae
10
2.5
2.5
0.55


Proteus hauseri
7.5
5
10
0.60


Pseudomonas aeruginosa
50
25
25
0.70


Pseudomonas stutzeri
10
5
5
0.70


Salmonella enterica
10
5
10
0.50





















TABLE 12





Strain
BIT
1:1
1:4
1:9
DGH




















Bacillus subtilis
5
3.75
2.5
2.5
3.75


Enterobacter aerogenes
25
10
10
10
10


Proteus hauseri
7.5
7.5
5
7.5
10


Pseudomonas aeruginosa
50
25
25
25
25





















TABLE 13







Strain
1:1
1:4
1:9









Bacillus subtilis
0.88
0.63
0.64



Enterobacter aerogenes
0.70
0.88
0.94



Proteus hauseri
0.88
0.53
0.78



Pseudomonas aeruginosa
0.75
0.90
0.95






















TABLE 14







Active






ingredient
Mixing ratio
MIC [ppm]
SI





















BIT

5




BIT:DGH
3:2
1
0.52



BIT:DGH
1:1
1
0.60



BIT:DGH
2:3
0.1
0.07



DGH

1


























TABLE 15






BIT
9:1
4:1
3:2
1:1
2:3
1:4
1:9
DGH
























Acremonium strictum
17.5
7.5
10
1.75
3.75
5
5
5
7.5


Aureobasidium pullulans
25
10
10
5
5
5
7.5
7.5
10


Chaetomium globosum
100
75
37.5
17.5
37.5
37.5
25
25
37.5


Fusarium solani
37.5
37.5
10
5
10
10
17.5
10
25


Geotrichum candidum
25
10
10
5
10
10
10
10
10


Penicillium pinophilum
37.5
17.5
10
5
5
7.5
5
5
5


Rhodotorula mucilaginosa
25
23
10
5
10
10
10
10
25


Trichoderma virens
87.5
37.5
25
17.5
25
25
37.5
25
37.5























TABLE 16






9:1
4:1
3:2
1:1
2:3
1:4
1:9







Acremonium strictum
0.49
0.72
0.16
0.36
0.51
0.59
0.63


Aureobasidium
0.46
0.52
0.32
0.35
0.38
0.66
0.71


pullulans









Chaetomium globosum
0.88
0.30
0.29
0.69
0.75
0.58
0.63


Fusarium solani
1.05
0.29
0.16
0.33
0.35
0.65
0.39


Geotrichum candidum
0.46
0.52
0.32
0.70
0.76
0.88
0.94


Penicillium
0.77
0.61
0.48
0.57
0.98
0.83
0.91


pinophilum









Rhodotorula
1.00
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40


mucilaginosa









Trichoderma virens
0.49
0.36
0.31
0.48
0.51
0.89
0.63























TABLE 17






BIT
9:1
4:1
3:2
1:1
2:3
DGH






















MIC [ppm]
25
10
10
5
10
10
25


SI

0.40
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.40









The above tables 11-17 clearly show that for two-component mixtures according to the invention of BIT and DGH in various mixing ratios, a marked synergism against various bacteria and fungi is present.
Example 4
The effect of an active ingredient combination of MIT and dodecylguanidine hydrochloride (DGH, data likewise refer to weight ratios) in various weight ratios was tested.

    
    
        Table 18: shows the MIC values and synergy indices for various bacteria at a MIT to DGH weight ratio of 9:1
        Table 19: shows the MIC values and synergy indices for Escherichia coli 
        Table 20: shows the MIC values and synergy indices for various fungi
        Table 21; shows the synergy indices calculated for the results according to table 20
        Table 22: shows the MIC values and synergy indices for Alternaria alternata at various MIT to DGH weight ratios
        Table 23: shows the MIC values and synergy indices for Stachybotrys chartarum at various MIT to DGH weight ratios
    
    















TABLE 18







Strain
MIT
9:1
DGH
SI






















Bacillus subtilis
25
10
2.5
0.76



Salmonella enterica
17.5
10
10
0.61



Staphylococcus aureus
50
5
1
0.59























TABLE 19







MIT
3:2
1:4
1:9
DGH























MIC [ppm]
25
7.5
5
2.5
5



SI

0.78
0.84
0.46























TABLE 20





Strain
MIT
9:1
4:1
3:2
1:4
DGH





















Aspergillus brasiliensis
1000
175
62.5
50
*
25


Candida albicans
250
50
50
25
25
25


Chaetomium globosum
500
62.5
50
50
25
25


Fusarium solani
250
50
50
25
25
25


Rhodotorula mucilaginosa
250
50
25
25
25
25


Trichoderma virens
750
62.5
62.5
37.5
25
25





* not determined



















TABLE 21







Strain
9:1
4:1
3:2
1:4









Aspergillus brasiliensis
0.86
0.55
0.83
*



Candida albicans
0.38
0.56
0.46
0.82



Chaetomium globosum
0.36
0.48
0.86
0.81



Fusarium solani
0.38
0.56
0.46
0.82



Rhodotorula mucilaginosa
0.38
0.28
0.46
0.82



Trichoderma virens
0.33
0.57
0.63
0.81







* not determined





















TABLE 22






MIT
9:1
4:1
3:2
2:3
1:4
1:9
DGH























MIC [ppm]
100
25
25
5
10
10
5
10


SI

0.48
0.70
0.23
0.64
0.82
0.46





















TABLE 23







MIT
9:1
4:1
DGH






















MIC [ppm]
250
50
25
10



SI

0.68
0.58










The above tables 18-23 clearly show that for two-component mixtures according to the invention of MIT and DGH in various mixing ratios, a marked synergism against various bacteria and fungi is present.
Example 5: Microbiological Load Test
A microbiological load test was used to test the susceptibility of water-based systems to microbial infestation and the effect of preservatives. For this, the preservatives were incorporated into the water-based systems in defined concentrations. To simulate conditions encountered in practice, the samples were subjected, following incorporation of the particular biocide products in the stated concentrations, to thermal treatment for 3 days at 60° C. in order to identify labile active ingredient constituents in the biocide products even in this phase of the experiment through subsequent ineffectiveness. Then, over an experiment period of 6 weeks, contamination with microorganisms was performed as stated below at weekly intervals such that after each contamination approx. 106-107 bacteria per/g are present. 3 and 7 days after each contamination it was established by germ count determination whether complete killing (=0 bacteria per/g) or at least replication inhibition (to 105-101 bacteria per/g) of the incorporated microorganisms has arisen compared to the non-preserved control samples.
As water-based system, a slurry of calcium carbonate (calcium carbonate slurry) with a solids fraction of 75% by weight was carried out. The microorganisms used for the experiment were the following types of bacteria in a mixture:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas oleovorans, Pseudomonas rubescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Alcaligenes faecalis, Citrobacter freuridii, Corynebacterium sp.
A very good effectiveness is achieved if the preserved samples bring about complete killing (=0 bacteria per/g) of the incorporated microorganisms (3=very good). A good effect is present if a greatly reduced microbe level is observed (to 103-101 bacteria per/g) compared to the nonpreserved sample.
A moderate effect is present if, compared to the nonpreserved sample, a slightly reduced microbe level is observed (to 104-103 bacteria per/g). A deficient effect is present if no or only a slight reduction in the microbe level is observed compared to the nonpreserved sample (to 107-105 bacteria per/g).
The achieved results are given in table 24.













TABLE 24





Dosage of








the biocide








mixtures
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 6







BIT/MIT








(each 2.5%)








500 ppm
2
1
1
1
0
0


750 ppm
3
2
1
1
0
0


1000 ppm 
3
3
2
1
0
0


500 ppm +
3
3
3
3
2
2


100 ppm DGH





500 ppm: addition of 0.05% of a liquid mixture of BIT (2.5%) and MIT (2.5%) to the finished calcium carbonate slurry






Assessment of the Preservation
0=deficient (107-105 bacteria per/g)
1=moderate (104-103 bacteria per/g)
2=good (103-101 bacteria per/g)
3=very good (0 bacteria per/g)
As the above table reveals, by adding DGH it is possible to boost the effect of mixtures of BIT and MIT known from the prior art, and antimicrobially, in particular antibacterially more resistant suspensions, dispersions or slurries of minerals, fillers or pigments result.

## Claims

1. A biocidal substance comprising:
(a) 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl 4-isothiazolin-3-one; and
(b) dodecylguanidine hydrochloride, wherein the 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, the 2-methyl 4-isothiazolin-3-one, and the dodecylguanidine hydrochloride are present in a weight ratio effective for providing biocidal synergy.

2. The biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1, wherein:
a weight ratio of components (a):(b) is 10:1 to 1:10; and
a sum of components (a) and (b) is 1 to 80% by weight, based on the total weight of the biocidal substance.

3. The biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1, wherein a weight ratio of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one to 2-methyl 4-isothiazolin-3-one is 1:100 to 100:1.

4. The biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1, wherein:
a weight ratio of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one to 2-methyl 4-isothiazolin-3-one is 1.5:1 to 1:2.5;
a weight ratio of components (a):(b) is 2:1 to 1:5; and
a sum of components (a) and (b) is 4 to 50% by weight, based on the total weight of the biocidal substance.

5. The biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1, further comprising, based on the total weight of the biocidal substance, 0.2 to 20% by weight of one or more further biocidal active ingredients selected from the group consisting of bronopol, benzylhemiformal, trimethylene-2-methylisothiazolinon-3-one, N-methylbenzisothiazolinone, 2-n-octylisothiazolin-3-one, tetramethylolacetylenediurea (TMAD), 1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)-5,5-dimethylimidazolidine-2,4-dione (DMDMH), p-chloro-m-cresol, dimethylolurea, 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutene, 2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilipropionamide, glutardialdehyde, ethylene glycol hemiformal, ethylene glycol bis-hemiformal, N-methylolurea, thiabendazole, carbendazim, zinc pyrithione, sodium pyrithione, 2-phenoxyethanol, phenoxypropanol, o-phenylphenol, chlorophene, quaternary ammonium salts, and 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one.

6. The biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1, wherein the biocidal substance contains no further biocidal active ingredients.

7. The biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1, wherein the biocidal substance is one of solutions, emulsions, suspensions, powders, foams, pastes, granules, aerosols and microencapsulations in polymeric substances.

8. The biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1, further comprising at least one of: interface-active substances, wetting agents, emulsifiers, dispersants, stabilizers, adhesives, thickeners, spreading agents, organic solvents, fragrances, dyes, buffer substances, buffer systems, pH regulators, solid carriers, and water.

9. A technical material containing the biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1.

10. The technical material as claimed in claim 9, wherein the technical material is selected from the group consisting of: a coating, a starch solution, a starch slurry, a product based on starch, a slurry of colored pigments, a slurry including both inorganic pigments and fillers, a construction chemical product, an adhesive based on animal raw materials, an adhesive based on vegetable raw materials, an adhesive based on synthetic raw materials, a polymer dispersion based on polyacrylate, a polymer dispersion based on polystyrene acrylate, a polymer dispersion based on styrene butadiene, a polymer dispersion based on polyvinyl acetate, a cleaner for industrial use, a cleaner for domestic use, a mineral oil, a mineral oil product, a cooling lubricant for metal working based on mineral oil-containing concentrates, a cooling lubricant for metal working based on semisynthetic concentrates, a cooling lubricant for metal working based on synthetic concentrates, an auxiliary for the leather industry, an auxiliary for the textile industry, an auxiliary for the photochemical industry, a pre-product of the chemical industry, an intermediate of the chemical industry, an ink, a wash, a wax emulsion, and a clay emulsion.

11. A method for protecting a technical material against infestation with microorganisms, for protecting a technical material from destruction by microorganisms, for controlling microorganisms on a technical material, or for controlling microorganisms in a technical material, the method comprising contacting the technical material with the biocidal substance of claim 1.

12. The biocidal substance as claimed in claim 1, wherein the biocidal substance does not include any of: interface-active substances, wetting agents, emulsifiers, dispersants, stabilizers, adhesives, thickeners, spreading agents, organic solvents, fragrances, dyes, buffer substances, buffer systems, pH regulators, solid carriers, and water.