alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,163
<SECURITIES>                                    24,570
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,638
<INVENTORY>                                     19,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,369
<PP&E>                                          17,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,393
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,856
<OTHER-SE>                                       (276)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,973
<SALES>                                         15,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,365
<CGS>                                           14,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,841
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,325)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph Dunn *v.*Richard J. Finley

Decided December 3, 1963

It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County at Waterbury with proper diligence, it is ordered that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION     I, Edward P. Smolyansky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Lifeway Foods, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for three month period ended March 31, 2006:     (1) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     (2) that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.Date: May 15, 2006       /s/ Edward P. Smolyansky         Chief Financial and Accounting Officerand Treasurer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsConsiderations for the Use of Remote Gaze Tracking to Assess Behavior in Flight SimulatorsComplex user interfaces (such as those found in an aircraft cockpit) may be designed from first principles, but inevitably must be evaluated with real users. User gaze data can provide valuable information that can help to interpret other actions that change the state of the system. However, care must be taken to ensure that any conclusions drawn from gaze data are well supported. Through a combination of empirical and simulated data, we identify several considerations and potential pitfalls when measuring gaze behavior in high-fidelity simulators. We show that physical layout, behavioral differences, and noise levels can all substantially alter the quality of fit for algorithms that segment gaze measurements into individual fixations. We provide guidelines to help investigators ensure that conclusions drawn from gaze tracking data are not artifactual consequences of data quality or analysis techniques.Document ID20170005592Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKalar, Donald J.*(San Jose State Univ. Research Foundation San Jose, CA, United States)*Liston, Dorion*(San Jose State Univ. Research Foundation San Jose, CA, United States)*Mulligan, Jeffrey B.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Beutter, Brent*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Feary, Michael*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredJune 15, 2017Publication DateOctober 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberARC-E-DAA-TN36043NASA/TM-2016-219424Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 330693.04.80.01.10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordseye trackingsimulationgaze trackingAvailable DownloadsNameType20170005592.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 83

Authorizing use of the Hart Building atrium for a concert by the

Congressional Chorus.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 29 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Mr. BAUCUS submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing use of the Hart Building atrium for a concert

by the Congressional Chorus.

1 Resolved, That the atrium of the Senate Hart Office

2 Building may be used from 12:00 noon until 1:00 p.m.

3 on one day during the spring and one day during the win4 ter of each session of the One Hundred Third Congress,

5 for a concert of American music to be presented by the

6 Congressional Chorus.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HealthChoice, Inc.  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
 Dr. J. W. Stucki, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant
 to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as adopted pursuant to S 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
 of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

           (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements of  Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)  The information contained in  the Report fairly presents,  in
           all material  respects,  the  financial condition  and  result  of
           operations of the Company.



 /s/ Dr. J. W. Stucki


 Dr. J. W. Stucki

 Chief Executive Officer

 May 15, 2006
Sixth Amendment to the benefit Restoration Plan of Avon Products Inc 9/8/2006



 EXHIBIT 10.34 
 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 BENEFIT RESTORATION PENSION PLAN OF AVON PRODUCTS, INC. 
 THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT is made to the Benefit Restoration Pension Plan of Avon Products, Inc. by AVON PRODUCTS, INC., a corporation duly organized and
existing under the laws of the State of New York (the “Company”). 
 INTRODUCTION 
 The Company maintains the Benefit Restoration Pension Plan of Avon Products, Inc. (the “Plan”) which was last amended and restated as of
December 1, 2005. The Company now desires to amend the Plan to require the Company to cash-out a member, if the lump sum equivalent actuarial cash value of the member’s accrued benefit on the date the member’s benefit is payable is
$25,000 or less, regardless of the deferral election such member has made. In addition, in the event a benefit is payable to a beneficiary as a result of the member’s death, the Company also has the right to cash out the beneficiary if the lump
sum equivalent actuarial cash value is $25,000 or less. Such amendment will be effective on September 8, 2006. 
 AMENDMENT

 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company does hereby amend the Plan as follows: 
 Effective as of September 8, 2006, by adding a new Section 3.5 to read as follows: 
 “3.5
Mandatory Cash-Out of Small Account Balances. On and after September 8, 2006, if the Equivalent Actuarial Value of a Member’s Supplemental Benefit at the time of the Member’s termination of employment is less than or equal to
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), then the Company will pay the Member or his or her Beneficiary, if applicable, a cash lump sum payment, regardless of the form and timing of benefit payments that the Member has previously elected, if any;
provided that such payment by the Company may only be made if the payment is made in connection with the termination of such Member’s interests in all similar arrangements that would constitute non-qualified deferred compensation plans under
Code Section 409A (as provided under Internal Revenue Service regulations and other guidance issued thereunder). Any such payment will be made by the Company no later than December 31 of the year in which the Member’s termination of
employment occurs or, if later, by the 15th day of the third month following the month in which the Member’s termination of employment occurs. 
 Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Sixth Amendment. 
  







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Sixth Amendment to be executed on the date set forth
below. 
  

					
		 	AVON PRODUCTS, INC.
			
	Date: September 7, 2006	 	By:	 	 /s/ Andrea Jung

		 	Title:	 	Chairman & CEO

  

 2
Exhibit 10(b)

                         CONSENT OF SHEARMAN & STERLING

      We hereby consent to the reference to our firm included in the prospectus
and statement of additional information of Merrill Lynch Large Cap Growth V.I.
Fund of Mercury Funds, Inc. filed as part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to
the Registration Statement (File No. 333-68879) and to the use of our opinion of
counsel, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 9 to Post-Effective Amendment No.
5 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A (File no. 333-68879).

                                                       /s/ Shearman & Sterling
                                                       -----------------------
                                                           Shearman & Sterling

New York, New York
April 15, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 192 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.192
                                                 Agreed to June 27, 1996

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                          Concurrent Resolution

 
             Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative days of Thursday, June 
27, 1996, or Friday, June 28, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until noon on 
Monday, July 8, 1996, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, June 27, 1996, 
Friday, June 28, 1996, Saturday, June 29, 1996, or Sunday, June 30, 
1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned 
until noon on Monday, July 8, 1996, or until such time on that day as 
may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion 
to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Distilled Solutions, LLC a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license to practice in the United States, the Government-owned invention described in U.S. Patent No. 6,893,540, entitled “High Temperature Peltier Effect Water Distiller,”  issued May 17, 2005, Navy Case No. 82,363.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than March 25, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City, 110 Vernon Ave., Code CDL, Panama City, FL 32407-7001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. James Shepherd, Patent Counsel, Naval Surface Warfare Center Panama City, 110 Vernon Ave., Panama City, FL 32407-7001, telephone 850-234-4646, fax 850-235-5497, or                         *james.t.shepherd@navy.mil.*

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: March 2, 2010.

A.M. Vallandingam,

Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-5089 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
EXHIBIT 31.1
  SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF C.E.O.
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    I, Julie Smolyansky, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lifeway Foods, Inc.; and
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
    Date:  October 3, 2014                                                       By: /s/ Julie Smolyansky
 Julie Smolyansky
 Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Amistad National Recreation Area huntingseason information
 
2007/2008| 2008/2009 | 2009/2010
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.39:AM 5/2/
Item Number:0654 (online)
CGP System Number:000992553
 
 
September 15, 2017**
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 192

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 192

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive days of Thursday, June 27, 1996, or Friday, June

4 28, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority

5 Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until noon on

6 Monday, July 8, 1996, or until noon on the second day

7 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec8 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

9 and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

10 of business on Thursday, June 27, 1996, Friday, June

11 28, 1996, Saturday, June 29, 1996, or Sunday, June 30,

12 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader

13 or his designee in accordance with this resolution, it stand

14 recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, July 8,

15 1996, or until such time on that day as may be specified

16 by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to

17 recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after

18 Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

19 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
2

•HCON 192 EH

1 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

2 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

3 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead4 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

5 and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

6 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
QUERYOBJECT CORPORATION

COMPURATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Three Months Ended Septmer 30,    Nine Months Ended September 30,
                                                      ------------------------------    -------------------------------
                                                          2000              1999            2000            1999
                                                          ----              ----            ----            ----

<S>                                                    <C>               <C>              <C>             <C>
Common shares outstanding at beginning of year         4,983,663         1,707,662        4,983,663       1,707,662

    Conversions of preferred stock into common shares  4,238,908           166,306        3,740,964         107,671

    Warrants exercised into common shares                591,696           462,162          578,594         293,208

    Stock options exercised into common shares            30,693                 -           21,933               -
                                                       ---------         ---------        ---------       ---------

Weighted average common shares outstanding             9,844,960         2,336,130        9,325,154       2,108,541
                                                       =========         =========        =========       =========

Net loss                                             $(2,686,570)      $(1,190,203)     $(6,753,364)    $(4,443,060)
                                                       =========         =========        =========       =========

Basic and diluted net loss per common share          $     (0.27)      $     (0.51)     $     (0.72)    $     (2.11)
                                                       =========         =========        =========       =========
</TABLE>
Order entered March 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01137-CV

BISHOP ABBEY HOMES, LTD. AND NATHAN HALSEY, Appellants

V.

BYRON AND PAIGE HALE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-11-1207

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ March 2, 2015 second unopposed motion for extension of time to 

file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than March 25, 2015. No further extensions will 

be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 74

Expressing the opposition of the Senate to the imposition of a fee on or

in-kind storage diversion requirement for imported crude oil and refined

petroleum products.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. PELL (for himself, Mr. MITCHELL, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr.

DODD, Mr. KERRY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. SMITH, Mr.

COHEN, Mr. GREGG, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. ROTH)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Finance

RESOLUTION

Expressing the opposition of the Senate to the imposition

of a fee on or in-kind storage diversion requirement

for imported crude oil and refined petroleum products.

Whereas a fee on imported crude oil and refined petroleum

products, whether in the form of a levy for general revenues, a levy to fund specific programs, or an in-kind storage requirement of a percentage of imported crude oil

and refined petroleum products, and whether fixed or

variable, would directly increase the costs of production

and manufacturing for industries that use petroleum

products;
2

•SRES 74 IS

Whereas the increased production costs resulting from such

a fee, levy, or diversion would impair the ability of industries to compete in international markets;

Whereas such a fee, levy, or diversion would directly increase

the costs to other users of petroleum products, including

those dependent on oil and oil products to heat their

homes and those who use electricity generated from oil;

and

Whereas the increased costs to industry and to homeowners

from such a fee, levy, or diversion would not be uniformly

distributed among geographic regions or economic sectors, but would be borne disproportionately by the regions and economic sectors that are most dependent on

petroleum products: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that nei2 ther the President nor the Congress should impose fees,

3 levies, or diversion requirements on imported crude oil and

4 refined petroleum products.

Æ
----

Action brought on 20 September 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Ireland

(Case C-391/06)

(2006/C 294/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Lawunmi, U. Wölker, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive had to be transposed expired on 14 February 2005.

----

(1)  OJ L 94, P.49

----