alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1.9005-3 Statutes of limitation.

Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the period within which the assessment of any deficiency attributable to the election may be made, or within which the credit or refund of any overpayment attributable to the election may be made, shall not expire sooner than one year after the last day for making the election. Thus, if assessment of a deficiency or credit or refund of an overpayment, whichever is applicable, was not prevented on September 26, 1961, the time for making assessment or credit or refund shall not expire for at least one year after the last day for making the election. Even though assessment of a deficiency was prevented on September 26, 1961, if commencement of a suit for recovery of a refund under section 7405 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 may have been made on such date, then any deficiency resulting from the election may be assessed at any time within one year after the last day for making the election. If a taxpayer makes the election, he shall be deemed to have consented to the application of the provisions of section 2 of the Act extending the time for assessing a deficiency attributable to the election. Section 2 of the Act does not shorten the period of limitations otherwise applicable. An agreement may be entered into under section 6501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and corresponding provisions of prior law to extend the period for assessment.

(Sec. 2(f), 75 Stat. 683; 26 U.S.C. 613 note)

[T.D. 6583, 26 FR 12079, Dec. 16, 1961]
#### § 1.356-4 Exchanges for section 306 stock.

If, in a transaction to which section 356 is applicable, other property or money is received in exchange for section 306 stock, an amount equal to the fair market value of the property plus the money, if any, shall be treated as a distribution of property to which section 301 is applicable. The determination of whether section 306 stock is surrendered for other property (including money) is a question of fact to be decided under all of the circumstances of each case. Ordinarily, the other property (including money) received will first be treated as received in exchange for any section 306 stock owned by a shareholder prior to such transaction. For example, if a shareholder who owns a share of common stock (having a basis to him of $100) and a share of preferred stock which is section 306 stock (having a basis to him of $100) surrenders both shares in a transaction to which section 356 is applicable for one share of common stock having a fair market value of $80 and one $100 bond having a fair market value of $100, the bond will be deemed received in exchange for the section 306 stock and it will be treated as a distribution to which section 301 is applicable to the extent of its entire fair market value ($100).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7971 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide timely equitable relief to an individual who suffers 

a loss based on an administrative error by the Secretary, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2024 

Mr. VAN ORDEN (for himself, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. EDWARDS, and Mr. 

CISCOMANI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide timely equitable 

relief to an individual who suffers a loss based on an 

administrative error by the Secretary, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENTS TO EQUITABLE RELIEF IN THE 

4 CASE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE ERROR BY THE 

5 SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 (a) AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO PROVIDE TIMELY EQUI7 TABLE RELIEF.—Section 503 of title 38, United States 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7971 IH

1 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘may’’ both places it appears 

2 and inserting ‘‘shall, not later than 120 days after such 

3 determination,’’. 

4 (b) ELIMINATION OF EXPIRED REPORT.—Such sec5 tion is further amended by striking subsection (c). 

6 (c) CANCELLATION OF DEBT COLLECTION.—Section 

7 5314 of such title is amended, in subsection (a), by adding 

8 at the end the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(3) The Secretary shall promptly cancel any agree10 ment, entered into by the Secretary with a debt collector 

11 (as defined in section 803 of the Fair Debt Collection 

12 Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692a)) to collect an amount of 

13 indebtedness described in paragraph (1), if the Secretary 

14 determines that the determination of such indebtedness 

15 was in error.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
      2005,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Gary M.
      De
      Laurentiis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Frederick Smith, Jr.,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
      pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
      to
      his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








August
      15, 2005                
      /s/ Gary M. De
      Laurentiis


Gary M. De Laurentiis


Chairman & Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)








August
      15, 2005                
      /s/ Frederick Smith,
      Jr.


Frederick Smith, Jr.


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)





[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Itec Environmental Group, Inc. and will be retained by Itec Environmental Group,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.]





11
#### § 1.993-7 Definition of United States.

Under section 993(g), the term “United States” includes the States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and possessions of the United States. For the requirement that a DISC must be incorporated and existing under the laws of a State or the District of Columbia, see § 1.992-1(a)(1).

[T.D. 7514, 42 FR 55468, Oct. 17, 1977]
### Gormas, Michael (OST) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status:

Dear Mr. Gormas, Glen Boyd <gboyd@ci.show-low.az.us> Friday, December 19, 2014 5:56 PM Gormas, Michael (OST) Bill Kopp EAS proposal deadline extension Follow up Completed

We understand that Mokulele Flight Service Inc. has requested afour week extension from you fortheir EAS proposal submission. The original deadline is December 22, 2014 and they have asked for an extension to January 20, 2015. We feel that this is a reasonable request and we support an extension ofthe deadline to at least January 20, 2015. Ifyou have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Glen Boyd Manager ShowLowRegionalAirport Show**Low~** Arizona 928-532-4192

1BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Essential Air Service at KINGMAN,ARIZONA PAGE,ARIZONA PRESCOTT,ARIZONA SHOW LOW,ARIZONA Under 49 U.S.C. §41731 

### etseq. ) ) ) ) Docket OST-1996-1899 ) Docket OST-1997-2694 ) Docket OST-1996-1899 ) Docket OST-1998-4409 ) )
REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENTION BYMOKULELE FLIGHT SERVICE INC. Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: Ron Hansen CEO Mokulele Flight Service Inc. 73-350 U'u Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Telephone: 808-840-9002 Fax: 808-326-1266 Email: ron.hansen@mokulelehawaii.com Mokulele Flight Service Inc. respectfully requests a four week extension ofthe submission deadline date ofDecember 22, 2014 as setbythe Department ofTransportation in its' solicitation ofcarrierproposals in the above mentioned cities to on or about January 20, 2014 (as Monday January 19 is a Federal holiday). Mokulele requests the additional time to complete its necessary due diligence on these markets and complete negotiations with potential codeshare partners and aircraft manufacturers. Submitted: December 19, 2014 Ron Hansen CEO Mokulele Flight Service Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Gehl
Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 28, 1997 and consolidated
statements of income for the six month period ended June 28, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                            6576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    71235
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      17579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                101166
<PP&E>                                           59928
<DEPRECIATION>                                   36407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  134212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            38884
<BONDS>                                          19989<F2>
<COMMON>                                           620
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       70672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    134212
<SALES>                                          95267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 95267
<CGS>                                            66737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    66737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10022 
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Company presents receivables on a net basis in compliance with Article 10
of Regulation S-X.
<F2>Includes all non-current portion of debt obligations
<F3>Not reported
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

Re:        Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill LynchTrust 2015-C26, Commercial  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C26

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)         A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)         To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### § 1.904(i)-0 Outline of regulation provisions.

This section lists the headings for § 1.904(i)-1.

## § 1.904(i)-1 Limitation on use of deconsolidation to avoid foreign tax credit limitations.

(a) General rule.

(1) Determination of taxable income.

(2) Allocation.

(b) Definitions and special rules.

(1) Affiliate.

(i) Generally.

(ii) Rules for consolidated groups.

(iii) Exception for newly acquired affiliates.

(2) Includible corporation.

(c) Taxable years.

(d) Consistent treatment of foreign taxes paid.

(e) Effective date.

[T.D. 9371, 72 FR 72603, Dec. 21, 2007]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8109 

To amend the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 to make permanent the Money 

Follows the Person rebalancing demonstration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2024 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. BALDERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 to make permanent the Money Follows the Person rebalancing demonstration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Money Follows the 

5 Person Permanency Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF MONEY FOLLOWS THE 

7 PERSON REBALANCING DEMONSTRATION. 

8 Section 6071(h)(1)(L) of the Deficit Reduction Act 

9 of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 1396a note) is amended by striking 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8109 IH

1 ‘‘each of fiscal years 2024 through 2027’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘fiscal year 2024 and each subsequent fiscal year’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAWANTAYE BOSWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, 

at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cr-00032-FPS-RWT1; 5:14-cv-00131-FPS-RWT)

Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dawantaye Boswell, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Michael Adkins, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, Randolph John Bernard, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dawantaye Boswell seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boswell has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

Boswell’s motions for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9                     
<CIK> 0000855876                
<NAME> CITIZENS BANCSHARES, INC 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000              
                                
<S>                             <C>                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          37,213
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,976
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    326,646
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          90,052
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            89,813
<LOANS>                                        706,200
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,203,983
<DEPOSITS>                                     887,136
<SHORT-TERM>                                   157,287
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,630
<LONG-TERM>                                     43,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,014
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,203,983
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,457
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,710
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   330
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,497
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,136
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,210
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,287
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      418
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (4)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,907
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,907
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.46
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,026
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,198
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   411
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,348
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,395
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      628
<RECOVERIES>                                       259
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,444
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,059
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         10,385
                                

</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About SBA 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Office of Hearings and Appeals 
-  OHA decisions 

## Section navigation

-  SBA locations 
-  Open government 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA 
-  Organization 
-  Oversight and advocacy    -  Office of Hearings and Appeals      -  PPP Appeals 
    -  Size appeals 
    -  8(a) appeals 
    -  NAICS appeals 
    -  WOSB and EDWOSB appeals 
    -  VOSB and SDVOSB protest and appeals 
    -  OHA Decisions 
    -  Appeal Publication Policy 
    -  Protective Order Information 
  -  Office of Inspector General 
  -  Office of the National Ombudsman 
  -  Office of Advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

# OHA decisions

The Office of Hearings and Appeals publishes unredacted final decisions within a few days of issuance. This policy is consistent with the Open Government Act, which promotes transparency, the presumption of openness, and proactive disclosures.

A party may request the public decision be redacted by contacting OHA promptly once an appeal is filed and requesting a protective order. For information on protective orders and OHA’s treatment of confidential information, see 13 C.F.R. § 134.205.

Search the decisions database using keywords, decision date, decision number, and/or the name of the party involved. Selecting the “Search” button will display your results in a new window.

### Search by Appeal Number

### Search by Appellant Name

### Plain text search

### Boolean search with field limits