alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
300

300

350

350

350

350

350

350

350

350

350

250

400

300

350

350

350

350

350

350

350

A L E JA N D R E N A S R D

C O X C A M P R D

E L T IG R E R D

L O S L O B O S R D

A L E JA N D R E JA S R D

A L E JA N D R E N A S R D

A L E JA N D E N A S

R D

A L E JA N D R E N A S R D

C O X C A M P R D

E L T IG R E R D

L O S L O B O S R D

A L E JA N D R E JA S R D

A L E JA N D R E N A S R D

A L E JA N D E N A S

R D

Rio

Gra

n

d

e

Rio

Grande

Rio

Grande

Arroyo Loma Blanca

FAL

CON

RESERVOIR

BECKWITH

ARM

Bronco

Canyon

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

Juan Vela

Lake Dam

Zapata SE

Falcon

Village Salineño

Arroyo

Miguel

Arroyo

Clareño

Beckwith

Arm Lopeño

FEET

FEET

740 000FEET

30" 99°07'30"

45'

99°

30"

26°

10'

26°

15'

12'

45'

99°

30"

07'

37'

12' 30"

26°

99° 10'

37'30"

15'

26°

42'30" 42'30"

40' 40'

16 790 000

780 000FEET

16 760000

E

4

4

29

4

4

29

4

29

29

29

4

29

4

000m

000m

29

4

4

29

29

4

29

4

29

29

29

4

29

4

29

29

4

000m

29

4 4

4 4

29

4

29

4

4

29

29

4

4

29

29

29

29

4

29

000m

54

57

76

51

79

55

83

58

81

53

49

87

46

87

50

77

85

46

55

79

86

N

80

82

58

84

78

51

48

80

84 85

50

81

49

47

86

52

76 78

57

54

45

56

52

56

82

83

48

E

77

53

N

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2699-413

BECKWITH ARM, TX-TAM

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

BECKWITH ARM QUADRANGLE

TEXAS-TAMAULIPAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 5 ́

1 MILS

5° 30 ́

98 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

MQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8116 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8116

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal 
  funds for live tissue training for Department of Justice personnel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2024

  Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania (for herself and Mr. Nehls) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal 
  funds for live tissue training for Department of Justice personnel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Wasteful and Outdated Medical 
Training on Animals Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR LIVE TISSUE TRAINING.

    Section 530C(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Limitation on use of funds for live tissue 
        training.--
                    ``(A) In general.--No Federal funds available to 
                the Attorney General may be used to conduct, contract 
                for, or otherwise support, live tissue training for 
                Department of Justice personnel, unless the Attorney 
                General issues a written, nondelegable determination 
                that such training is medically necessary and cannot be 
                replicated by simulators and other human-based training 
                methods.
                    ``(B) Definitions.--In this paragraph--
                            ``(i) the term `Federal funds' includes 
                        direct and indirect Federal financial 
                        assistance;
                            ``(ii) the term `human-based training 
                        methods' means medical training methodologies 
                        that do not use animals, including human 
                        patient simulators, task trainers, and 
                        cadavers; and
                            ``(iii) the term `live tissue training' 
                        means training procedures that inflict wounds 
                        and injuries on live animals to teach personnel 
                        to treat human casualties.''.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SSL SERVICES, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

2010-1107

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for theNorthern District of California Georgia in No. 08-CV5758, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J ONATHAN S. K AGAN , Irell & Manella LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were M ORGAN C HU and D AVID C. M CPHIE

.

P AUL K. V ICKREY , Niro, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were D INA M. H AYES and F REDERICK C. L ANEY

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L INN , P LAGER , and P ROST , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 13, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
427 A.2d 1231

#### Commonwealth ex rel. Osmolski v. Osmolski, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

Stephen M. Foxman, for appellant;

George Reed, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, WIEAND and VAN der VOORT, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation.

Order affirmed.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 220

Recognizing Portugal’s special relationship with the United States, and the

contribution of Portuguese Americans to American life.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 9 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

JUNE 10 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Recognizing Portugal’s special relationship with the United

States, and the contribution of Portuguese Americans

to American life.

Whereas June 10, Portugal’s National Day, celebrates the

life and work of the 16th century poet Luis Vaz de

Cam ̃oes of Portugal, whose work extols the courage and

exploits of Portuguese explorers who sailed to points beyond the horizon;

Whereas thousands of Portuguese have embarked on their

own voyages to the United States, and today over

2,000,000 Americans are able to trace their ancestry to

Portugal;
2

SRES 220 ATS

Whereas Portuguese Americans have distinguished themselves as honest, hard-working, patriotic, and family-oriented;

Whereas Portuguese Americans have achieved an important

place in American culture through their participation in

the arts, commerce, academics, sports, politics, and religion;

Whereas Portugal and the United States have had friendly

and cordial relations since American independence;

Whereas Portugal and the United States continue to work together, cooperating through their membership in the

North Atlantic Treaty Organization, to promote peace

and to adapt to the challenges of a changing world in

light of the lifting of the Iron Curtain;

Whereas Portugal and the United States have a relationship

based on mutual respect and a sharing of interests and

ideals, particularly a deeply held commitment to democratic values;

Whereas it is appropriate to honor Portuguese Americans

and celebrate the unique contributions both have made

throughout the history of the United States; and

Whereas it is appropriate to honor Portuguese people and

their national day: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Portugal is hereby recognized for its

2 special relationship with the United States, and that Por3 tuguese people are hereby recognized for their special con4 tributions to the United States.

Æ
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-50850

____________________

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

versus

CURTIS BLACKMORE, ET AL. DEFENDANTS

KIMBERLY JOYCE, Individually, As Representative

of the Estate of Joshua McNair, Deceased and 

As Next Friend of Shawna Martin, Shawnte Martin, 

Aryana McNair, and Michael McNair, Minors DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

___________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas, Austin

(A-95-CV-839)

___________________________________________

September 8, 1997

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.
Exhibit 32.1



Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas A. Murdock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thomas A. Murdock

Thomas A. Murdock

Chief Executive Officer







---

Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Roger D. Dudley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Roger D. Dudley

Roger D. Dudley

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 208 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 208

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3103.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 208

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3103), to amend the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 to improve portability and continuity of health 
insurance coverage in the group and individual markets, to combat 
waste, fraud, and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery, 
to promote the use of medical savings accounts, to improve access to 
long-term care services and coverage, to simplify the administration of 
health insurance, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following correction:
            Strike subtitle H of title II of the bill and the items 
        corresponding to such subtitle in the table of contents of the 
        bill in section 1(b).

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 1.9200-2 Manner of taking deduction. ( a ) *In general.* The deduction provided by § 1.9200-1 shall be taken by multiplying the amount of the monthly deduction determined under § 1.9200-1 (c)(2) for each motor carrier operating authority by the number of months in the taxable year for which the deduction is allowable, and entering the resulting amount at the appropriate place on the taxpayer's return for each year in which the deduction is properly claimed. Additionally, any taxpayer who has claimed the deduction provided by § 1.9200-1 must (unless it has already filed a statement containing the required information) attach a statement to the next income tax return of the taxpayer which has a filing due date on or after June 4, 1984. The statement shall provide, in addition to the taxpayer's name, address, and taxpayer identification number, the following information for each motor carrier operating authority for which a deduction was claimed: ( 1 ) The taxable year of the taxpayer for which the deduction was first claimed;
( 2 ) Whether the taxpayer's deduction was determined using the adjusted basis of the authority under section 1012 or an allocated stock basis under § 1.9200-1(e)(2); and
( 3 ) If an allocation of stock basis has been made under § 1.9200-1(e)(2), the calculations made in determining the amount of basis to be allocated to the authority.
( b ) *Filing and amendment of returns.* A taxpayer who has filed its return for the taxable year that includes July 1, 1980, claiming the deduction allowed under § 1.9200-1, may amend its return for such year in order to elect under § 1.9200-1(c)(1)(ii) to begin the 60-month period in the subsequent taxable year. A taxpayer eligible to take the deduction under § 1.9200-1 who has filed its returns for both the taxable year that includes July 1, 1980, and the following taxable year without claiming the deduction, may claim the deduction by filing amended returns or claims for refund for the taxable year in which the taxpayer elects to begin the 60-month period, and for subsequent taxable years. If a taxpayer first claims the deduction on an amended return under the preceding sentence, the statement required by paragraph (a) of this section must be attached to such amended return.
( c ) *Deduction taken for operating authority other than under § 1.9200-1 .* If a deduction other than the deduction allowed under § 1.9200-1 was taken in any taxable year for the reduction in value of a motor carrier operating authority caused by administrative or legislative actions to decrease restrictions on entry into the interstate motor carrier business, the taxpayer should file an amended return for such taxable year which computes taxable income without regard to such deduction.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1545-0767) (Sec. 266, Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (Pub. L. 97-34; 95 Stat. 265); sec. 517, Highway Revenue Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-424; 96 Stat. 2097); and sec. 7805, Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805)
[T.D. 7947, 49 FR 8249, Mar. 6, 1984]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  UCAP   Incorporated  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Lynn
Bradley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ J. Lynn Bradley
-----------------------
J. Lynn Bradley
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003





<PAGE>
§ 1.742-1 Basis of transferee partner's interest. ( a ) *In general.* The basis to a transferee partner of an interest in a partnership shall be determined under the general basis rules for property provided by part II (section 1011 and following), Subchapter O, Chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code. Thus, the basis of a purchased interest will be its cost. Generally, the basis of a partnership interest acquired from a decedent is the fair market value of the interest at the date of his death or at the alternate valuation date, increased by his estate's or other successor's share of partnership liabilities, if any, on that date, and reduced to the extent that such value is attributable to items constituting income in respect of a decedent (see section 753 and §§ 1.706-1(c)(3)(v) and 1.753-1(b)) under section 691. See section 1014(c). However, the basis of a partnership interest acquired from a decedent is determined under section 1022 if the decedent died in 2010 and the decedent's executor elected to have section 1022 apply to the decedent's estate. For basis of contributing partner's interest, see section 722. The basis so determined is then subject to the adjustments provided in section 705.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies on and after January 19, 2017. For rules before January 19, 2017, see § 1.742-1 as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 2016.
[T.D. 9811, 82 FR 6239, Jan. 19, 2017]
427 A.2d 1212

#### Commonwealth v. Diggs, Appellant.

Submitted April 12, 1979.

H. Patrick McFalls, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

*610Before ..VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and WATKINS, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1820

___________ Jeffrey L. Thurman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Michael Kemna, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: August 26, 2005 Filed: August 31, 2005

___________ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Jeffrey Thurman appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Having conducted careful de novo review, see Gordon v. Hansen , 168 F.3d 1109, 1113 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Mr. Thurman’s complaint. We also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mr. Thurman’s motions to amend his complaint, or in-2- refusing to order the production of documents at this early stage of the litigation. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 4.42





ADDENDUM TO BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT
DATED SEPTEMBER 24, 2018



|Borrower: | Ehave, Inc. of 277 Lakeshore Road East, Suite 203, Oakville, ON L6J 6J3 (the “Borrower”)
|--------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|          |                                                                                         
|Lender:   | ___________ of ___________ (the “Lender”)                                               



Principal Amount: $_______ CDN



| | 1. | FOR VALUE RECEIVED, before the Initial Closing Date. If the proposed recapitalization of the company and bridge financing does
not close in its entirety by October 31st, 2018, this note shall pay $_________ CDN and be considered part of the existing
senior debt of the Borrower.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Any time while not in default under this Note, the Borrower may repay the outstanding balance then owing under this Note to
the Lender without further bonus or penalty.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | This Note will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | This Note will endure to the benefit of and be binding upon the representative heirs, executors, administrators, successors
and assigns of the Borrower and the Lender.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly affixed their
signatures under seal on this 27 day of September, 2018.



|SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED | Ehave, Inc.        
|---------------------------- | -------------------
|                             |                    
|September 27, 2018           |                    
|                             |                    
|                             | Per                
|                             |                    
|SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED | ___________________
|                             |                    
|September 27, 2018           |                    
|                             |                    
|                             | Per