alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         120,304
<SECURITIES>                                   149,920
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               449,063
<PP&E>                                         126,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,053,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          404,999
<BONDS>                                        247,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,389
<OTHER-SE>                                     386,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,053,137
<SALES>                                        476,761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               482,244
<CGS>                                          343,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  467,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 208

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a correction

in the enrollment of H.R. 3103.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. THOMAS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make

a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3103.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 3103), to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to

4 improve portability and continuity of health insurance cov5 erage in the group and individual markets, to combat

6 waste, fraud, and abuse in health insurance and health

7 care delivery, to promote the use of medical savings ac8 counts, to improve access to long-term care services and

9 coverage, to simplify the administration of health insur-
2

•HCON 208 ATH

1 ance, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of

2 Representatives shall make the following correction:

3 Strike subtitle H of title II of the bill and the

4 items corresponding to such subtitle in the table of

5 contents of the bill in section 1(b).

Æ
exv10w45



 





Exhibit 10.45




PLAINS ALL AMERICAN

PPX SUCCESSOR

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN




Section 1. Background.




     On November 15, 2006 (the “merger date”), Pacific Energy Partners, L.P. (“Pacific”) was merged
with and into Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (“PAA”). As of the merger date, Plains All
American GP, LLC assumed the Amended and Restated Pacific Energy GP, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan
(the “Pacific Legacy Plan”). On February 22, 2007, the Plains All American PPX Successor Long-Term
Incentive Plan (this “Successor Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors of Plains All
American GP LLC. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are defined in the Plains All
American 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2005 LTIP”)



Section 2. Units.




     A total of 999,809 Units (representing the units previously available under the Pacific Legacy
Plan, after conversion at 0.77 Units for each Pacific unit) may be issued under this Successor
Plan.



Section 3. Awards.




     For purposes of this Successor Plan, “Award” shall mean Options or Phantom Units (with or
without tandem DERs) granted under the Successor Plan.



Section 4. Eligibility.




     Awards under this Successor Plan may only be made to (i) individuals employed by Pacific or
its affiliates on the merger date or (ii) individuals hired by PAA or its affiliates at any time
after the merger date.



Section 5. 2005 LTIP Governs.




     Awards with respect to Units that may be issued under the Successor Plan will be governed by
and administered pursuant to terms and conditions set forth in the 2005 LTIP, except as such terms
and conditions may be modified by the limitations set forth in the Successor Plan.



Section 6. Term.




     This Successor Plan shall be effective on the date of its approval by the Board and shall
continue until the date terminated by the Board or Units are no longer available for grants of
Awards under this Successor Plan, whichever occurs first. However, unless otherwise expressly
provided in this Successor Plan or in an applicable Award, any Award granted prior to such
termination, and the authority of the Board or the Committee to amend, alter, adjust, suspend,
discontinue, or terminate any such Award or to waive any conditions or rights under such Award,
shall extend beyond such termination date.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6169

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

VICTOR JARVIS, a/k/a Vic, a/k/a V, a/k/a

Powder Man,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-26, CA-99-21-4)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion as time

barred. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Jarvis, Nos. CR-95-26;

CA-99-21-4 (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7984 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7984

 To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
improve access to disaster assistance for individuals located in rural 
                     areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2024

Mr. Pappas (for himself, Mr. Bean of Florida, Mr. Golden of Maine, and 
  Mr. Mann) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
improve access to disaster assistance for individuals located in rural 
                     areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Small Business Resilience 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESS TO DISASTER ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS LOCATED IN RURAL 
              AREAS.

    Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall 
ensure that the Associate Administrator of the Office of Disaster 
Recovery and Resilience of the Administration takes such actions as 
necessary to ensure that individuals located in rural areas (as defined 
in paragraph (16) of section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
636(b)(16))) for which a disaster declaration has been made under such 
section 7(b) have full access to assistance provided under such 
section, including by providing targeted outreach and marketing 
materials to such individuals.

SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

    The second paragraph (16) (relating to statute of limitations) of 
section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)) is 
redesignated as paragraph (17).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1.274-1 Disallowance of certain entertainment, gift and travel expenses.

Section 274 disallows in whole, or in part, certain expenditures for entertainment, gifts and travel which would otherwise be allowable under Chapter 1 of the Code. The requirements imposed by section 274 are in addition to the requirements for deductibility imposed by other provisions of the Code. If a deduction is claimed for an expenditure for entertainment, gifts, or travel, the taxpayer must first establish that it is otherwise allowable as a deduction under Chapter 1 of the Code before the provisions of section 274 become applicable. An expenditure for entertainment, to the extent it is lavish or extravagant, shall not be allowable as a deduction. The taxpayer should then substantiate such an expenditure in accordance with the rules under section 274(d). See § 1.274-5. Section 274 is a disallowance provision exclusively, and does not make deductible any expense which is disallowed under any other provision of the Code. Similarly, section 274 does not affect the includability of an item in, or the excludability of an item from, the gross income of any taxpayer. For specific provisions with respect to the deductibility of expenditures: for an activity of a type generally considered to constitute entertainment, amusement, or recreation, and for a facility used in connection with such an activity, as well as certain travel expenses of a spouse, etc., see § 1.274-2; for expenses for gifts, see § 1.274-3; for expenses for foreign travel, see § 1.274-4; for expenditures deductible without regard to business activity, see § 1.274-6; and for treatment of personal portion of entertainment facility, see § 1.274-7.

[T.D. 6659, 28 FR 6499, June 25, 1963, as amended by T.D. 8666, 61 FR 27006, May 30, 1996]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 20 Engrossed in House (EH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 20

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used from 8 o'clock 
ante meridiem until 3 o'clock post meridiem on April 27, 1995, for 
ceremonies as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of 
victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremonies 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 23, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 20

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for ceremonies as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 172 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                         June 11, 1996.
      Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives 
(H. Con. Res. 172) entitled ``Concurrent resolution authorizing the 
1996 Summer Olympic Torch Relay to be run through the Capitol Grounds, 
and for other purposes.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 2, line 8, strike out all after ``Grounds'' down to and 
including ``overnight,'' in line 9

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session 

                            H. CON. RES. 172

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
i1iiiti.'

rc: )( %OO' 

August 8, 2012 

Administrator Lisa Jackson 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Room 300, Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Aye, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Administrator Jackson, 

I am writing today to ask that you immediately consider using your existing waiver 

authority to adjust the corn-ethanol mandate for the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) 

to reflect the impact the mandate is having on increasing food and feed costs. 

Additionally, I would urge you to take into consideration that impact as you decide on 

the volumetric requirements for the RFS for the 2013. 

According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), drought conditions 

and a "rapid decline in crop conditions" since early June have caused the USDA to 

reduce the projected U.S. corn yield by 20 bushels per acre in its latest forecast, The 

USDA also reported that the 50 percent of the nation's corn crop was rated as poor-tovery-poor earlier this week. Last month, similar forecasts pushed U.S. corn prices to 

record levels, and the price remains exceptionally high today. 

The use of corn to meet the requirements of the RFS is contributing to higher prices 

because a substantial amount of our nation's food crop is diverted to make fuel. With 

approximately 40 percent of our nation's corn crop diverted from the normal food supply 

chain to make fuel, feed and food prices are skyrocketing to unacceptable levels for 

producers and working families. 

All of these factors make it essential for you to use the authority given to the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to waive all or portions of the RFS if there is 

inadequate supply to meet the mandate or when such a waiver will prevent economic 

harm to the country, a region, or a state. When you combine the USDA's projections for 

food price inflation at levels significantly higher than normal economic inflation with the 

already struggling economy, families and businesses will continue to struggle if you do 

not grant this waiver. 

I look forward to your prompt consideration of this request and hope that you will agree 

that an immediate adjustment of the corn-ethanol mandate is necessary. 

Michael B. Enzi 

United States Senate
1

Assessing	the	Effect	of	Five	Gasoline	Properties	on	Exhaust	Emissions	from	LightDuty	Vehicles	certified	to	Tier-2	Standards

Analysis	of	Data	from	EPA	Phase	3

(EPAct/V2/E-89)

Appendix		Q.4

Model	Fitting	Information	for

Ethane (Bag	2)

This appendix summarizes model fitting for Bag-2 Ethane. Model-fitting techniques and approaches 

summarized in Section 8.7. Features of the data and modeling for this compound are listed below.

Fuel-parameter matrix: REDUCED

Media contamination: NO

No. measurements: 62

No. censored values: 1

Modeling approach: MIXED MODEL

Estimated Dependent Variable model: NO
2

Models fit for Bag-2 Ethane

Model term Notation Model

Full FM1

etOH Ze ● ×

Arom Za ● ●

T50 Z5 ● ●

T90 Z9 ● ●

1

Indicates “Full minus 1,” etc.

Fitting history for Bag-2 Ethane – with “FM1” selected as best fit model.

Fit Parameters Test with respect to

Full

Test with respect to

Previous Model

Model p -2lnL BIC

1 Dev.1

d Pr>χ

2 Dev. d Pr>χ2

Full 5 84.42 95.68 0.6829 1 0.41

FM1 4 85.96 95.62 2.2256 2 0.33 1.54 1 0.21

1 A lower value indicates a better fit. 1 The deviation is the difference in

the -2loglik statistics for the 

nested and reference models,

respectively, per Error! Reference source not found..

Coefficients and Type-III Tests of Effect for the Full and Best-Fit Models – Ethane (Bag 2).

Effect Full Model Best-Fit Model (MM1)

Estimate Std.Err. d.f. t-value Pr>t Estimate Std.Err. d.f. t-value Pr>t

Intercept -7.7241 0.7325 5.00 -10.5 0.00013 -7.7241 0.7320 5.00 -10.55 0.00013

Ze 0.07345 0.05873 57.00 1.25 0.22

Za

-0.1260 0.05151 57.00 -2.45 0.018 -0.1092 0.05041 57.00 -2.17 0.034

Z5 0.1815 0.05727 57.00 3.17 0.0025 0.1452 0.05006 57.00 2.90 0.0053

Z9 0.1322 0.04994 57.00 2.65 0.010 0.1270 0.05044 57.00 2.52 0.015

2  veh 2.6785 2.6669

2 

0.1458 0.1517
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Magellan Technology, Inc. Form 10-QSB 1st Qtr 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                66,298
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        915,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                         213,800
<INVENTORY>                                          916,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,893,958
<PP&E>                                             1,147,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                       236,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     4,404,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              6,153,066
<BONDS>                                              567,381
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               4,689
<OTHER-SE>                                        (2,320,932)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       4,404,204
<SALES>                                            1,417,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,417,997
<CGS>                                                327,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        906,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     863,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   160,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (840,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (840,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (840,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.05)
        

</TABLE>
§ 1.6414-1 Credit or refund of tax withheld on nonresident aliens and foreign corporations. ( a ) *In general.* Any withholding agent who for the calendar year pays more than the correct amount of: ( 1 ) Tax required to be withheld under chapter 3 of the Code, or
( 2 ) Interest, addition to the tax, additional amount, or penalty with respect to such tax, may file a claim for credit or refund of the overpayment in the manner and subject to the conditions stated in the Procedure and Administration Regulations (Part 301 of this chapter) under section 6402, or may claim credit for the overpayment as provided in paragraph (b) of this section. With respect to the payment of withholding tax under section 1446, this section shall only apply to a publicly traded partnership described in § 1.1446-4. See § 1.1446-3(d)(2)(iv) for rules regarding refunds to a withholding agent under section 1446.
( b ) *Claim for credit on Form 1042.* The withholding agent may claim credit of an overpayment described in paragraph (a) of this section for any calendar year by showing the amount of overpayment on the return on Form 1042 for such calendar year, which shall constitute a claim for credit under this paragraph. The claim for credit shall be evidenced by a statement on the return setting forth the amount determined as an overpayment and showing such other information as may be required by the instructions relating to the return. The amount claimed as a credit may be applied, to the extent it has not been applied under § 1.1461-2(b), by the withholding agent to reduce the amount of a payment or deposit of tax required by § 1.1461-1 or § 1.6302-2(a) for any payment period occurring in the calendar year following the calendar year of overwithholding. The amount so claimed as a credit shall also be entered on the annual return on Form 1042 for the calendar year following the calendar year of overwithholding and shall be applied as a payment on account of the tax shown on such form. If the withholding agent files a claim for credit or refund of the overpayment on Form 843 in accordance with § 301.6402-2 of this chapter (Procedure and Administration Regulations), or a claim for refund of the overpayment on Form 1042 in accordance with § 301.6402-3 of such chapter, he may not claim credit for the overpayment under this paragraph.
( c ) *Overpayment of amounts actually withheld.* No credit or refund to the withholding agent shall be allowed for the amount of any overpayment of tax which, after taking into account paragraph (b) of § 1.1464-1, the withholding agent has actually withheld from an item of income under chapter 3 of the Code.
( d ) *Effective/Applicability date.* The last two sentences of paragraph (a) of this section shall apply to partnership taxable years beginning after April 29, 2008.
[T.D. 6922, 32 FR 8714, June 17, 1967, as amended by T.D. 9394, 73 FR 23085, Apr. 29, 2008]