alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 193

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the cost of Government spending

and regulatory programs should be reduced so that American families

will be able to keep more of what they earn.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 1996

Mr. DELAY (for himself, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BLILEY, Mr.

BURR, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CUNNINGHAM,

Mr. EWING, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr.

MANZULLO, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. MICA, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. SAXTON, Mrs.

VUCANOVICH, Mr. GINGRICH, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr.

ZELIFF, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. WICKER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr.

POMBO, Mr. COX of California, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr. ROTH,

Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. PACKARD, Mr.

ALLARD, Mr. HEINEMAN, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, and Mr. ARMEY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the cost of Government spending and regulatory programs should be

reduced so that American families will be able to keep

more of what they earn.

Whereas the total cost of Government spending and regulations (total cost of Government) has increased from 48.2

percent of the net national product (NNP) in 1989 to an

estimated 50.4 percent of NNP in 1996;
2

•HCON 193 IH

Whereas the total cost of Government now exceeds

$3,380,000,000,000 annually;

Whereas Federal regulatory costs now exceed

$730,000,000,000 annually;

Whereas the cost of Government in general and excessive regulations in particular have placed a tremendous drain on

the economy in recent years by reducing worker productivity, increasing prices to consumers, and increasing unemployment;

Whereas, if the average American worker were to spend all

of his or her gross earnings on nothing else besides meeting his or her share of the total cost of Government for

the current year, that total cost would not be met until

July 3, 1996;

Whereas July 3, 1996, should therefore be considered Cost

of Government Day 1996; and

Whereas it is not right that the American family has to give

up more than 50 percent of what it earns to the government: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that, as

3 part of balancing the budget and reevaluating the role of

4 government, Federal, State, and local elected officials

5 should carefully consider the costs of Government spend6 ing and regulatory programs in the year to come so that

7 American families will be able to keep more of what they

8 earn.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the three months
of which the quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
        Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the three months covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants three months
then ended that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2006/s/ Jay N. Torok

Jay N. TorokChairman of the BoardGreat Western Land and Recreation, Inc.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 148

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United Nations should be encouraged to permit representatives of Taiwan to participate fully in its

activities, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Mr. SIMON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United Nations

should be encouraged to permit representatives of Taiwan to participate fully in its activities, and for other

purposes.

Whereas the United States has had a long history of friendship with the government of the Republic of China, more

widely known as Taiwan;

Whereas Taiwan has the largest foreign reserves of any nation and a strong, vibrant economy, and now has the

20th largest gross national product in the world;

Whereas Taiwan has dramatically improved its record on

human rights and now routinely holds free and fair elections in a multiparty political system;
2

•SRES 148 IS

Whereas agencies of the United States Government or the

United Nations working with Taiwan does not prevent or

imperil a possible voluntary union between the People’s

Republic of China and Taiwan any more than recognizing

separate governments in the former West Germany and

the former East Germany prevented the voluntary reunification of Germany;

Whereas Taiwan has much to contribute to the work and

funding of the United Nations;

Whereas governments of other nations that maintain diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China such

as France and Norway, have also had ministerial-level exchanges with Taipei; and

Whereas it is in the interest of the United States and the

United Nations to maintain good relations with a government and an economy as significant as that on Taiwan:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) the President, acting through the United

3 States Permanent Representative to the United

4 Nations, should encourage the United Nations to

5 permit representatives of Taiwan to participate fully

6 in the activities of the United Nations and its spe7 cialized agencies; and

8 (2) Cabinet-level exchanges between Taiwan

9 and the United States should take place in the inter10 ests of both nations.
3

•SRES 148 IS

1 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

2 a copy of this resolution to the President.

Æ
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Max Fenster

*Harold B. Bean,*assistant prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state).

*G. Robert Satti,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued December 3

decided December 17, 1963

It appearing that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court so far as it affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit finding the defendant guilty under the second count of the information, it is ordered that the judgments of the trial court and the Appellate Division under the second count are set aside and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment dismissing the second count of the information.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0585

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHARLES GEOFFREY SANTORO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 26, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 19 2022

08/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0585
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19 - 6121
ALBERTO CEJA

- VARGAS , Petitioner

- Appellant , v. M. BRECKON, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Elizabeth Kay Dillon , District Judge. ( 7:18

- cv - 00022

- EKD

- RSB )
Submitted : May 16, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019
Before DIAZ and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
. Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Alberto Ceja

- Vargas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alberto Ceja

- Vargas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting Respondent’s motion for summary judgment on Ceja

- Vargas’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, althoug h we grant Ceja

- Vargas leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
. See Ceja

- Vargas v. Breckon , No. 7:18

- cv - 00022

- EKD

- RSB ( W.D. Va
. Jan. 2, 2019 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00330-CR

Britt Lee Miller

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1456595D)

June 7, 2018

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0530

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

DAVID ABRAHAM LORENZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 26, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 19 2022

09/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0530
427 A.2d 1221

#### Commonwealth v. Strohl, Appellant.

*624Submitted June 29, 1979.

Terance L. Faul, for appellant;

John E. Gallagher, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, GATES and DOWLING, JJ.*

*

 President Judge G. Thomas Gates of the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, and Judge John C. Dowling of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, are sitting by designation.

AND NOW, to-wit, this 18th day of April, 1980, this record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County for the appointment of new PCHA counsel, other than a public defender, who will not have a conflict in such representation and who will immediately undertake to represent appellant as to the question raised on this appeal claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 193 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 193

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Expressing the sense of the Congress that the cost of Government 
  spending and regulatory programs should be reduced so that American 
         families will be able to keep more of what they earn.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 193

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the total cost of Government spending and regulations (total cost of 
        Government) has increased from 48.2 percent of the net national product 
        (NNP) in 1989 to an estimated 50.4 percent of NNP in 1996;
Whereas the total cost of Government now exceeds $3,380,000,000,000 annually;
Whereas Federal regulatory costs now exceed $730,000,000,000 annually;
Whereas the cost of Government in general and excessive regulations in 
        particular have placed a tremendous drain on the economy in recent years 
        by reducing worker productivity, increasing prices to consumers, and 
        increasing unemployment;
Whereas, if the average American worker were to spend all of his or her gross 
        earnings on nothing else besides meeting his or her share of the total 
        cost of Government for the current year, that total cost would not be 
        met until July 3, 1996;
Whereas July 3, 1996, should therefore be considered Cost of Government Day 
        1996; and
Whereas it is not right that the American family has to give up more than 50 
        percent of what it earns to the government: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that, as part of balancing the 
budget and reevaluating the role of government, Federal, State, and 
local elected officials should carefully consider the costs of 
Government spending and regulatory programs in the year to come so that 
American families will be able to keep more of what they earn.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 22, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 01316
- CV
ERIC DEWAYNE PRICE , Appellant

V. JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN, AS TRUSTEES OF JAME S SKOKAN &

DIANA C. SKOKAN 1989 INTER VIVOS TRUST , Appellee s On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 08631 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Myers, and Boatrig ht Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated January 16, 2018, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days . We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has n ot filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Cou rt regarding the status of this appeal

. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

171316F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ERIC DEWAYNE PRICE, Appellant

No. 05

- 17

- 01316

- CV V.

JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN, AS TRUSTEES OF JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN 1989 INTER VIVOS TRUST, Appellees On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. DC

- 16

- 08631. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers. Justices Myers and Boatright participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellees JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN , AS TRUSTEES OF JAMES SKOKAN & DIANA C. SKOKAN 1989 INTER VIVOS TRUST recover their costs of this appeal from appellant ERIC DEWAYNE PRICE.

Judgment entered this 22nd day of February, 2018.
PUBLIC LAW 113–83—FEB. 15, 2014 128 STAT. 1011 

Public Law 113–83 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To temporarily extend the public debt limit, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Temporary Debt Limit Extension 

Act’’. 

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3101(b) of title 31, United States 

Code, shall not apply for the period beginning on the date of 

the enactment of this Act and ending on March 15, 2015. 

(b) SPECIAL RULE RELATING TO OBLIGATIONS ISSUED DURING

EXTENSION PERIOD.—Effective March 16, 2015, the limitation in 

effect under section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, shall 

be increased to the extent that— 

(1) the face amount of obligations issued under chapter 

31 of such title and the face amount of obligations whose 

principal and interest are guaranteed by the United States 

Government (except guaranteed obligations held by the Secretary of the Treasury) outstanding on March 16, 2015, exceeds 

(2) the face amount of such obligations outstanding on 

the date of the enactment of this Act. 

SEC. 3. RESTORING CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY OVER THE 

NATIONAL DEBT. 

(a) EXTENSION LIMITED TO NECESSARY OBLIGATIONS.—An 

obligation shall not be taken into account under section 2(b)(1) 

unless the issuance of such obligation was necessary to fund a 

commitment incurred pursuant to law by the Federal Government 

that required payment before March 16, 2015. 

(b) PROHIBITION ON CREATION OF CASH RESERVE DURING

EXTENSION PERIOD.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall not issue 

obligations during the period specified in section 2(a) for the purpose 

Effective date. 

Temporary 

Debt Limit 

Extension Act. 

31 USC 3101 

note. 

Feb. 15, 2014 

[S. 540] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
128 STAT. 1012 PUBLIC LAW 113–83—FEB. 15, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 540: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 159 (2013): Mar. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 160 (2014): Feb. 11, considered and passed House, amended. 

Feb. 12, Senate concurred in House amendment. 

Æ 

of increasing the cash balance above normal operating balances 

in anticipation of the expiration of such period. 

Approved February 15, 2014. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20032 USDC No. CA-H-95-1279

PAUL EARL DORSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN E. STINE; MARSHALL D. HERKLOT; B. DRIVER; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - July 25, 1996 Before DAVIS, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paul Earl Dorsey, Texas prisoner #642562, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). For the first time on appeal, Dorsey argues that prison officials violated certain prison regulations concerning access to medical treatment. Because Dorsey raised this claim for the first time on appeal, we review for plain error. Douglass v. United Serv. Auto. Ass’n , 79No. 96-20032 - 2 - F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc). Dorsey’s allegation that prison officials violated a prison regulation does not establish a constitutional violation. See Jackson v. Cain , 864 F.2d 1235, 1251 (5th Cir. 1989). Therefore, there is no error, plain or otherwise. Dorsey argues that the punishment imposed in the disciplinary proceedings, the loss of a substantial amount of good-time credits, was excessive and disproportionate to the offenses charged. Because Dorsey’s claim calls into question the duration of his confinement, he must challenge successfully the decision denying his good-time credits in a habeas corpus action before bringing a § 1983 action. See Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994); Preiser v. Rodriguez , 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973); Wilson v. Foti , 832 F.2d 891, 892 (5th Cir. 1987). Dorsey argues that the three disciplinary proceedings violated his due process rights, that they were not supported by the evidence, and that he was denied access to the prison grievance system. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion in the dismissal.
See Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 31-32 (1992). Dorsey has not raised a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, his motion for IFP is DENIED and his appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Dorsey’s “Application for Process of Service,” motion for discovery, motion forNo. 96-20032 - 3 - production of documents, motion for interrogatories, motion for admission, and motion for continuance are also DENIED.
MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of the Chief FinancialOfficer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S. C.Section 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marian P.Hamlett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| November 14, 2005 |   /s/ Marian P. Hamlett |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Marian P. Hamlett,                |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer           |

 

----