alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 23

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current link between the

levels of earnings allowed for blind individuals entitled to disability insurance benefits and the exempt amounts allowed for purposes of the social

security earnings test for individuals who have attained retirement age

should be maintained.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1995

Mrs. KENNELLY (for herself, Mr. ROSE, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr.

HAYWORTH, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. JACOBS, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota,

Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Mr. PASTOR), submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current link

between the levels of earnings allowed for blind individuals entitled to disability insurance benefits and the exempt amounts allowed for purposes of the social security

earnings test for individuals who have attained retirement age should be maintained.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that, in

3 considering legislation providing for increases in exempt

4 amounts allowed for purposes of the social security earn5 ings test under section 203(f)(8) of the Social Security
2

•HCON 23 IH

1 Act for individuals who have attained retirement age, the

2 Congress should ensure that the equivalency currently pro3 vided between—

4 (1) such exempt amounts, and

5 (2) the levels of earnings allowed under section

6 223(d)(4) of such Act, for individuals entitled to dis7 ability insurance benefits based on blindness, with8 out demonstrating substantial gainful activity,

9 will be maintained.

Æ
United States Department of the Interior

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Air Resources Division

P.O. Box 25287

Denver, Colorado 80225

April 27, 2016

Mr. Lew Weinstock

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Room C304-02

Re: Certification of National Park Service, Gaseous Pollutant Monitoring Program Data for 2015

Dear Mr. Weinstock,

The National Park Service, Air Resources Division, hereby certifies the NPS Gaseous Pollutant Monitoring 

Program (GPMP) ozone data for the year 2015 that currently reside on the EPA AQS. The ambient concentration data 

and associated quality assurance data have been completely submitted to AQS for the year 2015. These data have 

undergone stringent validation procedures and are believed to be a consistent and accurate representation of ambient air 

quality conditions within the monitored NPS units. All quality assurance findings have been taken into account in 

determining the data’s validity.

Attached are:

• A summary table of NPS units that the NPS intends to certify for 2015.

• AMP600 Data Certification Report for 2015 data.

Please refer to the attached summary table that lists which sites the NPS intends to certify. There are sites 

operated by the NPS that we do not wish to certify because of the method used or because the site does not belong 

solely to the NPS. These sites are not included in the table. Please contact me (barkley_sive@nps.gov; 303-987-6947) if 

you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Barkley Sive

BS:jw Program Manager

Cc: John Vimont

Kristi Morris
Exh. 10.5.2 Def. Comp. Trust. Amend. 4





Exhibit 10.5.2

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO

NORTHEAST UTILITIES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR TRUSTEES







The Northeast Utilities Deferred Compensation Plan for Trustees, as amended (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended, effective September 12, 2006, as follows:




Article 8 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:




“This Plan may be amended or terminated by the Board of Trustees or by the Compensation Committee of the Board at any time; provided, however, that no such amendment or termination, unless required under statute, regulation, other law, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation, shall serve to diminish the rights of a Trustee with respect to amounts credited to his or her Deferred Cash and/or Deferred Stock Compensation Accounts or accelerate payment of such amounts.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMERISOURCE
HEALTH AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          66,834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  499,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,775
<INVENTORY>                                    825,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,397,754
<PP&E>                                         112,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,519,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          865,672
<BONDS>                                        656,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           270
<OTHER-SE>                                     (13,351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,519,505
<SALES>                                      3,532,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,532,404
<CGS>                                        3,353,351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,353,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               117,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,273
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,949
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,982)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,967
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GUADALUPE ROSAS-ROSAS,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

Respondent.

No. 23-1840

Agency No.

A208-586-937

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 22, 2024**

Portland, Oregon

Before: WALLACH***, CHRISTEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Guadalupe Rosas-Rosas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing an appeal from 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Senior Circuit Judge

for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

FILED

AUG 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-1840

an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of removal, 

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Exercising 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, we deny the petition.

1. Substantial evidence supports the denial of asylum and withholding 

based on Rosas’s failure to demonstrate a nexus between membership in a particular 

social group (“PSG”) and any past or feared future harm. Rosas asserted 

membership in a PSG of “Mexican young men who have resisted cartel gang 

recruitment, with parents who refuse to pay for their protection,” but conceded that 

his father paid the cartel twice. Moreover, the agency reasonably concluded “that a 

person who resists gang recruitment is not a member of a cognizable particular social 

group.” See Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d 855, 860–62 (9th Cir. 2009)

(rejecting similar PSG), abrogated on other grounds by Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 

707 F.3d 1081, 1093 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc).

2. Substantial evidence also supports the denial of CAT relief. An 

applicant seeking CAT relief must demonstrate “that it is more likely than not that 

he or she would be tortured if removed,” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2), “by, or at the 

instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of, a public official . . . or other 

person acting in an official capacity,” id. § 1208.18(a)(1). Substantial record 

evidence supports the IJ’s determination—rendered after considering all record 

evidence, including expert testimony—that “the government of Mexico continues to 
3 23-1840

fight against cartels” and would not acquiesce to torture. See Andrade-Garcia v. 

Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 836 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[G]eneral ineffectiveness on the 

government’s part to investigate and prevent crime will not suffice to show 

acquiescence.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### § 1.468B-4 Taxability of distributions to claimants.

Whether a distribution to a claimant is includible in the claimant's gross income is generally determined by reference to the claim in respect of which the distribution is made and as if the distribution were made directly by the transferor. For example, to the extent a distribution is in satisfaction of damages on account of personal injury or sickness, the distribution may be excludable from gross income under section 104(a)(2). Similarly, to the extent a distribution is in satisfaction of a claim for foregone taxable interest, the distribution is includible in the claimant's gross income under section 61(a)(4).

[T.D. 8459, 57 FR 60994, Dec. 23, 1992]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 

______________________________

)

MOHAMMED ABDULLAH )

TAHA MATTAN (ISN 684), )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 09-CV-0745 (RCL)

)

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

 )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondents’ Consent Motion [1183] for Extension of Time to Respond

to Petitioner’s Motion for Expedited Judgment, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Respondents are allowed until June 1, 2009, to file their opposition;

and it is further

 ORDERED that Respondents' Motion [1163] for Stay is DENIED.

 SO ORDERED. 

Date: May 19, 2009. ___/s/______________________________

 ROYCE C. LAMBERTH

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 16, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 16, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0400. MOOSA COMPANY, LLC v. COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA 

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2018CV312091
Exhibit 11
 POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31
 2011
    
    
    2010A Net income as reported, IFRS ($ millions)
    
    
    732
    
    
    
    444B Items adjusting net income ($ millions)
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    14C Net income, US GAAP ($ millions)
    
    
    742
    
    
    
    458D Weighted average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    854,033,000
    
    
    
    888,357,000E Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share
calculation (IFRS)
    
    
    22,434,000
    
    
    
    25,755,000F Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation (US GAAP)
    
    
    22,428,000
    
    
    
    25,755,000IFRSBasic earnings per share (A/D)
    
    
    0.86
    
    
    
    0.50Diluted earnings per share (A/(D+E))
    
    
    0.84
    
    
    
    0.49UNITED STATES GAAPBasic earnings per share (C/D)
    
    
    0.87
    
    
    
    0.52Diluted earnings per share (C/(D+F))
    
    
    0.85
    
    
    
    0.50
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 83 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 83

   Authorizing use of the Hart Building atrium for a concert by the 
                         Congressional Chorus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 29 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

Mr. Baucus submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing use of the Hart Building atrium for a concert by the 
                         Congressional Chorus.

    Resolved, That the atrium of the Senate Hart Office Building may be 
used from 12:00 noon until 1:00 p.m. on one day during the spring and 
one day during the winter of each session of the One Hundred Third 
Congress, for a concert of American music to be presented by the 
Congressional Chorus.

                                 <all>
```
§ 1.875-2 Beneficiaries of estates or trusts. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Exception for certain taxable years.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, for any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1975, the grantor of a trust, whether revocable or irrevocable, is not deemed to be engaged in trade or business within the United States merely because the trustee is engaged in trade or business within the United States.
( c ) [Reserved]
[T.D. 7332, 39 FR 44233, Dec. 23, 1974]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****What you need to know aboutlung cancer**
 
PDF | Mobi | epub
 
SuDoc:HE 20.3152:L 97/2012
Item Number:Link0507-G-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000910675
 
December 13, 2017
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00359

- CV

Eunice Wells

v.

Target Corporation §

§

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 2

of Parker County (CIV

- 13

- 0258)

Apri l 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

Dissent by Justice Gabriel



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the

trial court i s reversed and the case i s remanded to the trial court for further

proceedings.

It is further ordered that Appellee Target Corporation shall pay all of the

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Le e Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
#### § 1.832-3 Taxable years affected.

Sections 1.832-1 and 1.832-2 are applicable only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953, and before January 1, 1963, and ending after August 16, 1954, and all references therein to sections of the Code and regulations are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the regulations thereunder before amendments. Sections 1.832-4, 1.832-5, and 1.832-6 are applicable only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1962, and all references therein to sections of the Code and regulations are to sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 as amended.

[T.D. 6681, 28 FR 11129, Oct. 17, 1963]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

      ( print page 37988)    

# Time and Date:

 11 a.m., Friday, August 14, 2009.

# Place:

 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

 Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

 Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-18347 Filed 7-28-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 116 Engrossed in House (EH)]

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 116

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1060, to provide for the 
disclosure of lobbying activities to influence the Federal Government, 
and for other purposes, the Secretary of the Senate shall make the 
following corrections:

            (1) In section 6(8), strike ``6'' and insert ``7''.
            (2) In section 9(7), insert ``and'' after the semicolon, in 
        section 9(8), strike ``; and'' and insert a period, and strike 
        paragraph (9) of section 9.
            (3) In section 12(c), strike ``7'' and insert ``6''.
            (4) In section 15(a)(2), strike ``8'' and insert ``7''.
            (5) In section 15(b)(1), strike ``, 5(a)(2),'' and in 
        section 15(b)(2), strike ``8'' and insert ``7''.
            (6) In section 24(b), strike ``13, 14, 15, and 16'' and 
        insert ``9, 10, 11, and 12''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 116

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in 
                       the enrollment of S.1060.
```
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATION**     This Report on Form 10-Q of Tri – County Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for thequarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Date: November 13, 2006 By: /s/ Michael L. Middleton Michael L. Middleton      President and Chief Executive Officer         Date: November 13, 2006 By: /s/ William J. Pasenelli William J. Pasenelli      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Ernesta B. BARNES, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, and Time Oil Company, Real Party in Interest.

No. 86-7040.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 13, 1986.

Kathleen P. Dewey, Robert L. Klarquist, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.

William H. Bode, Donald W. Fowler, Spriggs, Bode & Hollingsworth, Washington, D.C., Terrill L. Henderson, Jackson J. Fox, U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for respondent.

Before SCHROEDER, FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The petition for a writ of mandamus is granted. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601*et seq.*does not authorize pre-enforcement review of Environmental Protection Agency orders. *See Wheaton Industries v. United States Environmental Protection Agency,*781 F.2d 354, 356 (3d Cir.1986); *J.V. Peters & Co., Inc. v. Administrator, EPA,*767 F.2d 263, 265 (6th Cir.1985). The district court is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

A certified copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of the court.
QUERYOBJECT SYSTEMS CORPORATION                                    EXHIBIT  11.1

Computation of Net Loss Per Share
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                             ----------------------------
                                                                 2000         1999
                                                             -----------   --------------


<S>                                                           <C>          <C>
Common shares outstanding at beginning of year                4,983,663    1,707,662

         Conversions of preferred stock into common shares    2,766,756       34,722

         Warrants exercised into common shares                  552,246       85,731

         Stock options exercised into common shares              10,707         --
                                                            ----------- ------------

Weighted average common shares outstanding                    8,313,372    1,828,115
                                                            =========== ============


Net loss                                                    $(1,994,892) $(1,717,537)
                                                            =========== ============


Basic and diluted net loss per common share                 $     (0.24) $     (0.94)
                                                            =========== ============
</TABLE>