1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: 

John Pennick

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS 

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION

OF DJI Phantom 3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF 

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 

(PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Submitted on June 22, 2015 

John Pennick

318 E. via Puente de las Rosas

Sahuarita, AZ 85629

408-857-7444

john@pennick.com
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS..............................................................................................3

SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................4 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER...................................................................4 

BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................4 

BASIS FOR PETITION................................................................................................................4

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER.....................................................................................6

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH JOHN PENNICK SEEKS 

EXEMPTION.............................................................................................................................6

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF JOHN PENNICK SEEKS AND THE REASON JOHN PENNICK SEEKS THE 

RELIEF.......................................................................................................................................9

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING JOHN PENNICK’S REQUEST WOULD

BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ..................................................................................................11

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT 

SAFETY...................................................................................................................................13

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER.........................................23

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE 

TO SUPPORT JOHN PENNICK ’S REQUEST..............................................................................23

CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................................24

DJI PHANTOM 3 OPERATION MANUEL IS ATTACHED
3

 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation 

GCS Ground Control Station 

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link 

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command 

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333 

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures 

UA Unmanned Aircraft 

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System 

VFR Visual Flight Rules 

VLOS Visual Line of Site 

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions 

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing
4

SUMMARY

JOHN PENNICK seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned 

Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This 

exemption will permit JOHN PENNICK to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the 

commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of real estate, and landscape over 

certain areas of the United States. 

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

JOHN PENNICK provides his clients with photography and videography of properties for the purpose of 

advertising. JOHN PENNICK has hundreds of hours Hobby RC flying experience and over 6 years flying 

Hobby RC Helicopters with video and camera attachments. The objective of JOHN PENNICK and his 

aerial operations is to provide high quality imaging for a variety of commercial, public, and residential 

uses, specifically targeting:

• Residential Construction 

• Real-estate marketing 

• Filmmaking

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft System: DJI Phantom 3 UAS

JOHN PENNICK seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation or hire within the NAS. The 

DJI Phantom 3 is a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control 

Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The DJI Phantom 3 has a maximum 

gross weight of 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, a length of 17.3 inches, width of 17.7 inches, height of 11.8 inches, 

and a maximum speed of approximately 42 knots. The DJI Phantom 3 UA is equipped with four main 

rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors. 

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, JOHN PENNICK, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 

11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for 

Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 

14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 

91.417(a) & (b). 
5

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, JOHN PENNICK's operation of DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of 

FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Accordingly, JOHN PENNICK requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), 

and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft 

with an airworthiness certificate. 

JOHN PENNICK submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be 

ensured. JOHN PENNICK will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, 

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices 

prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction 

Manual). Furthermore, JOHN PENNICK will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS.

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and 

limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by JOHN PENNICK to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in 

Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, 

and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is 

able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including 

evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles 

and structures. 

JOHN PENNICK seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 

Subpart H. As such, JOHN PENNICK submits that he will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UA is in an 

airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UAS is in compliance with the 

operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log and the DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual), and 

that the aircraft is in a condition for safe flight. 

JOHN PENNICK also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter 

Settings, as the DJI Phantom 3 UA will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However, 

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UA will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System 

(GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the 

GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with JOHN PENNICK’s 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a 

level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. 

Additionally, JOHN PENNICK seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled 

Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. JOHN PENNICK submits that safety will not be affected by 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) 
6

under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approximately 

14.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that 

for at least 4.5 minutes.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, JOHN PENNICK provides the following information in support of its 

petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner. 

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is: 

John Pennick

318 E. via Puente de las Rosas

Sahuarita, AZ 85629

408-857-7444

john@pennick.com

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption. 

1. JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) and (b). 

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections (a) and (b) 

prescribe the following, in relevant part: 

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an 

aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for 

compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft. 

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any 

business or employment if—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a). 

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following: 

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition. 
7

3. JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121. 

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part:

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that 

aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating--

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of 

the aircraft; 

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current 

reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or 

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an 

appropriate altimeter setting available before departure. 

4. JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b). 

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection (b), states the 

following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and 

forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, 

assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes. 

5. JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a). 

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or 

operator of an aircraft—

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required 

inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as 

prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.] 

6. JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1) 

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration, 

subsection (a)(1), states the following: 
8

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, 

rebuilding, or alteration unless--

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.] 

7. JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within 

the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had --

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to 

service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or 

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this 

chapter. 

8. JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And 91.417(b). 

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following: 

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or 

operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section: 

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of the 100-hour, 

annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft 

(including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must 

include--

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed; 

and 

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and 

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return to 

service. 

(2) Records containing the following information: 

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor. 
9

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and 

appliance. 

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be 

overhauled on a specified time basis. 

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection 

required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained. 

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, 

for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the 

AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is 

required. 

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the 

airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances. 

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed: 

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is 

repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed. 

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferred 

with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold. 

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter 

shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service. 

C. The Extent Of Relief JOHN PENNICK Seeks And The Reason JOHN PENNICK Seeks The Relief. 

1. Extent Of Relief JOHN PENNICK Seeks And The Reason JOHN PENNICK Seeks Relief From 

Section 61.113(a) And (b). 

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, 

is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as 

well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight-hour and currency 

requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire. This relief is 

requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may, for 

compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if: 

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry 

passengers or property for compensation or hire. 
10

As set forth more fully below, JOHN PENNICK submits that an equivalent level of safety will be 

maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has met 

certain flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this 

exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances 

from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Further, JOHN PENNICK submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS conducted by the PIC pursuant 

to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to JOHN PENNICK’s business; and (2) will not carry 

passengers or property for compensation or hire. 

2. Extent Of Relief JOHN PENNICK Seeks And The Reason JOHN PENNICK Seeks Relief From Section 

91.7(a). 

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent required to 

allow JOHN PENNICK to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in airworthy condition prior to every 

flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., the JOHN PENNICK

Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and the DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). 

JOHN PENNICK seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not require an 

airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, JOHN PENNICK will 

ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the 

operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and the DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual) prior 

to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the 

conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief JOHN PENNICK Seeks And The Reason JOHN PENNICK Seeks Relief From Section 

91.121. 

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations of the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio 

communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the 

ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS 

operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), JOHN PENNICK seeks 

the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet 

AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight. 

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the 

extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully 

set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 3 UA's altitude 

information will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio 
11

communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of 

the flight path.

4. Extent Of Relief JOHN PENNICK Seeks And The Reason JOHN PENNICK Seeks Relief From Section 

91.151(b). 

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is requested to the 

extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UA during daylight hours in visual 

meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 14.5 minutes to 

the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 

minutes. JOHN PENNICK seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 

91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UA will severely constrain the 

practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that JOHN PENNICK proposes to conduct 

pursuant to this Petition. 

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS's operating 

documents, and JOHN PENNICK’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that JOHN PENNICK will safely 

operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UA during daylight hours in visual meteorological 

conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 

14.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that 

for at least 4.5 minutes. 

5. Extent Of Relief JOHN PENNICK Seeks And The Reason JOHN PENNICK Seeks Relief From Sections 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b). 

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft 

with an airworthiness certificate, JOHN PENNICK requests relief from these Sections because the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate. As set forth more fully below, the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness 

certificate. Accordingly, JOHN PENNICK will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, 

or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the 

UAS operating documents (i.e., the JOHN PENNICK Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance 

Log, and the DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, JOHN PENNICK will document and 

maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

D. The Reasons Why Granting JOHN PENNICK Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That Is, How It 

Would Benefit The Public As A Whole. 

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing JOHN PENNICK to safely, 

efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of real estate, and landscape over 

certain areas of the United States. 
12

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and 

provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of JOHN PENNICK’s proposed 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy issues. 

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 3 UA is battery powered and serves as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to 

the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the amount of manned 

aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 3 UAS 

would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as 

increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground. 

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around 

airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3 UA does not 

require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video 

and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control 

during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations. 

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will greatly 

benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during 

traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and electric 

motors, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS produces no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally 

conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically 

utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 20-30 gallons per hour of leaded 

aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 UA, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also 

eliminates noise pollution, as the UAs are propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an 

internal combustion engine.

By using the DJI Phantom 3 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in 

the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, 

will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members 

located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 UA (gross weight of 6 pounds 7.5 ounces, a length of 

17.3 inches, width of 17.7 inches, height of 11.8 inches, and a maximum speed of approximately 42 

knots and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property 

on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations 

(weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, 

and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons). 
13

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Benefit The 

Economy. 

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is also an economical alternative to using 

manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will 

allow United States based companies, like JOHN PENNICK, to remain competitive and contribute to 

growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental 

Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and 

operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to remain competitive. 

Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS is one such technology that not only allows 

companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility 

without the high operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft. 

By operating the DJI Phantom 3 UAS companies such as JOHN PENNICK, can remain competitive and 

profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will 

ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. 

companies, through commercial use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, provides a stable workforce that 

increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to 

invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and 

abroad. 

4. There Are No Privacy Issues. 

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, JOHN 

PENNICK’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not implicate any privacy issues. 

Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., 

the JOHN PENNICK Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and the DJI Phantom 3 

Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement 

notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude 

requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The 

Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From Which 

JOHN PENNICK Seeks Exemption. 

1. Reasons Why the DJI Phantom 3 UA Meet The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization and Reform 

Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333. 

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, JOHN PENNICK’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of 

FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, 

Subpart H. 
14

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth 

requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part:

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the 

plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this 

Act. 

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under subsection (a), the 

Secretary shall determine, at a minimum--

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational 

capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not 

create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national 

security; and 

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under 

section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems 

identified under paragraph (1). 

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.-- If the Secretary determines under this section that certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall 

establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system. 

In seeking this exemption, JOHN PENNICK submits that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS can operate safely in the 

NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations. 

a. The Specifications Of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Demonstrates Its Safe Characteristics.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a 

threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability. 

i. Technical Specifications Of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is set forth by the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, 

attached hereto.

ii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Autonomous Flight And Navigation Modes Enable The UAS To Remain 

Within A Defined Operational Area. 

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous flight modes. A 

complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is provided in the 

DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, attached hereto.
15

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS is Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of 

Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation. 

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 UA will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds or 

more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 UA does not reacquire control link data from the GCS, the 

UAs will assume that the Control Link is lost and the UAs will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe 

mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown. 

A complete description of Failsafe Functions and the flight control software of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is 

provided in the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, attached hereto.

b. Flight Operations Of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in 

Command With A Safety Observer. 

JOHN PENNICK will be the only person to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. 

Additionally, a safety observer will assist in flights.

c. Flights Of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations. 

In seeking this exemption, JOHN PENNICK proposes to commercially operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS for 

the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United States, 

pursuant to the following specific operating limitations: 

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described in 

the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: and 

DJI Phantom 3 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new 

petition or a petition to amend this grant. 

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of 

aerial video and photography. 

3. The UAs may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots. 

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL), as 

indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and 

approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 

5. The UAs must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the 

PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on 

the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted. 

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS 

requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and PIC must be able to 

communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight 
16

operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for 

the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the 

operating documents. 

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air 

traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or 

other instruments. 

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and 

made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating 

documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and 

must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s 

responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator 

upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for 

extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or 

revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must 

petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may be 

contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents. 

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If 

the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited 

from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a 

condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All 

maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records. 

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight 

characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The 

PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records. 

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, 

items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating documents. 

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. 

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in 

accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of 

replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in 

service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS 

to service. 

15. Each UASs operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins. 
17

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken 

against discrepancies discovered between inspections. 

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third- class medical 

certificate. 

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification 

criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS 

will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must 

be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the 

operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only 

be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience-building 

flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must 

operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119. 

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must 

be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special 

request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under special 

visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized. 

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted on a 

current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is 

obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s 

COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the 

Administrator upon request. 

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a 

cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC. 

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a pre-determined location 

within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating 

documents. 

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance 

with the operating documents. 

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather 

conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land 

the UA with 25% battery power remaining. 

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or 

Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also 

require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but 

not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with 
18

airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential 

transponder requirements. 

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, 

registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N- Number) markings in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable. 

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the 

UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government 

oversight agency requirements. 

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the 

Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made 

available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation operations and activities 

at all times. 

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons 

other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: 

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the 

UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating 

persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave 

such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately 

and/or; 

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of 

such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety 

assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard, and; 

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an 

undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a). 

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with permission from 

the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or 

authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted. 

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the 

operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office 

(AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board 

(NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. 
19

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety. 

JOHN PENNICK submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will 

be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has 

demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely 

operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and 

emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and 

structures. 

Considering JOHN PENNICK’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forthabove; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial 

pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS, JOHN PENNICK submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a 

commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for JOHN 

PENNICK’s specific proposed flight operations. The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 

61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented 

herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 

11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

JOHN PENNICK will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has 

demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 UAS training and 

currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner 

consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 

61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a 

UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). 

In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 

90 days (for currency purposes). 

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was obtained 

in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during JOHN 

PENNICK’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience 

that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as 

follows: 

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of motion 

picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner 

consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 

hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the 

PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same 

make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA 
20

considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and 

model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the 

total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 

takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a 

minimum, the flight-hour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build 

proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also 

finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable 

regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience-building flights can also 

be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, 

proficiency, and experience-building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate 

distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. 

Accordingly, JOHN PENNICK will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency 

requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with 

the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances 

from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not Adversely Affect 

Safety. 

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every 

flight, JOHN PENNICK will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon 

the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions and limitations 

herein. 

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 

11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 

11159, 11160, 11161). 

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not Adversely Affect 

Safety. 

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude 

information of the DJI Phantom 3 UA will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio 

communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of 

the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with JOHN PENNICK’s operation of the 

and DJI Phantom 3 UAs within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety 

equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment installed 

onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by 

the UASs at ground level. 
21

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all 

material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 

11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161). 

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not Adversely 

Affect Safety. 

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 

91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (2) the limitations on 

the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Accordingly, JOHN 

PENNICK will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UA during daylight 

hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first 

point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. 

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; the limitations 

on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure an 

equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured 

as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS provides audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UA

experiences low battery voltage, the first warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery 

power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the 

DJI Phantom 3 UAS will descend and land automatically. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is 

not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are 

considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums 

prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has 

previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material 

respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 

11159, 11160, 11161). 

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections  91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety. 

In seeking this exemption, JOHN PENNICK submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the 

regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because JOHN PENNICK will use trained technicians 

to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, 

techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the JOHN PENNICK Aerial 

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and the DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). 

Furthermore, JOHN PENNICK will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 3 

UAS. Since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, JOHN 
22

PENNICK will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 

91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual is attached hereto.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because JOHN PENNICK will use trained 

technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the 

methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents. 

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 

91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be performed 

by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly 

maintenance log. 

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the 

technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. 

In consideration of JOHN PENNICK’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the 

technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, JOHN PENNICK submits that safety will not be adversely 

affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), 

and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in 

all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 

11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 

11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation. 

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. 

§ 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, JOHN PENNICK requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions 

for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS which contain such safety standards that the 

Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. 

Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAs 

for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United 

States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether 

a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national 

security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification 

in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the 

NAS. 

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for 

operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not 

contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the 

aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following: 
23

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual 

design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and 

amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of 

this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA 

finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. 

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16. 

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special 

conditions for JOHN PENNICK’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which contain such safety 

standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that 

established by 14 C.F.R. 

Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

• A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules From Which 

John Pennick Seeks Exemption: 

JOHN PENNICK seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). 

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption JOHN PENNICK Seeks: 

This exemption will permit JOHN PENNICK to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) 

for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. 

• Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support JOHN PENNICK’s 

Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333, 

which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in the NAS. 

As such, JOHN PENNICK’s request for exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA 

Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above. 

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to 

users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the 

authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. 

As discussed in detail above, JOHN PENNICK will operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS safely in the NAS, 

without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national 

security. 
24

CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, JOHN PENNICK seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of 

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the DJI 

Phantom 3 UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of 

conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By granting this 

Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing JOHN PENNICK to 

safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially within the NAS. 

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, JOHN PENNICK respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this 

Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit John Pennick to

operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography over certain areas of the United States.

Dated: June 22, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

John Pennick

318 E. via Puente de las Rosas

Sahuarita, AZ 85629

408-857-7444

john@pennick.com