alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 164

Expressing the sense of the Senate commemorating the bombing

of Pan Am Flight 103.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. GRASSLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

NOVEMBER 20 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Committee discharged

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate commemorating the

bombing of Pan Am Flight 103.

Whereas two hundred and fifty-nine passengers and crew

members of Pan American Airways Flight 103 and eleven persons on the ground in Lockerbie, Scotland, were

killed by a terrorist bomb on December 21, 1988;

Whereas one hundred and eighty-nine Americans were victims of this heinous attack along with citizens from

twenty other nations;

Whereas this was effectively an attack on the United States

and on all nations which support the rule of law;
2

SRES 164 CDS

Whereas the families and friends of the victims of this outrageous and criminal act have suffered an incalculable

loss and have worked actively to diminish the possibility

of future attacks;

Whereas, on December 21, 1993, five years will have passed

without the terrorists who murdered the passengers and

crew of Pan Am Flight 103 being brought to justice;

Whereas the United States must never forget the victims of

this crime nor weaken in its resolve to bring their murderers to justice; and

Whereas it is appropriate and fitting that the United States

set aside a day to commemorate the bombing of Pan Am

Flight 103 as an act of remembrance for the victims, an

expression of solidarity with their loved ones and a token

of the abiding United States commitment to obtain justice for their murderers: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That December 21, 1993, is designated a

2 ‘‘Fifth Anniversary Day of Remembrance for the Victims

3 of the Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103’’, and the President

4 is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

5 upon the people of the United States to observe this day

6 with appropriate ceremonies.

Æ
1

The Honorable F. A. Gossett, III, United States Magistrate Judge for the

District of Nebraska, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3515

___________

Marlin E. Jones, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Nebraska.

*

Terry L. Burns, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: April 22, 2010

Filed: April 27, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Marlin E. Jones appeals the district court’s1

 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(b) dismissal of his action for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court

orders. We conclude that dismissal was not an abuse of discretion because, without

sufficient justification, Jones did not attend the final pretrial conference and did not

appear for trial. See DuBose v. Minnesota, 893 F.2d 169, 171 (8th Cir. 1990)

(standard of review; affirming Rule 41(b) dismissal where pro se plaintiff failed to
-2-

attend pretrial conference or appear for trial). We likewise conclude that the court did

not abuse its discretion in declining to appoint counsel to represent Jones, see Phillips

v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; outlining

factors), or in denying Jones’s late-tendered motion to transfer venue, see Terra Int’l,

Inc. v. Miss. Chem. Corp., 119 F.3d 688, 696 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Edd Helms Group, Inc.
and Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, W. Edd Helms, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the company.

Date: October 20, 2008      /s/  W. Edd Helms, Jr.
      ---------------      ----------------------
                           W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer

      October 20, 2008     /s/  Dean A. Goodson
      ---------------      --------------------
                           Dean A. Goodson, Chief Financial Officer

      October 20, 2008      /s/  L. Wade Helms
      ---------------      ------------------
                           L. Wade Helms, Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>                      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
                              FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                              FROM 10Q DATED JUNE 30, 1999 AND
                              IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                              REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                              STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                        182871
<SECURITIES>                  1188130
<RECEIVABLES>                 95813
<ALLOWANCES>                  4896
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1552435
<PP&E>                        158803
<DEPRECIATION>                109342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2072535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         181040
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      225
<OTHER-SE>                    1689561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2072535
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              224864
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 174607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               35838
<INCOME-TAX>                  14300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           12698
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  12698
<EPS-BASIC>                 .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .56



</TABLE>
#### § 1.534-3 Jeopardy assessments in Tax Court cases.

In the case of a jeopardy assessment, a notice of deficiency is required to be sent to the taxpayer by registered mail (or by certified or registered mail, if the notice is mailed after September 2, 1958) within 60 days after the making of the assessment. See section 6861. If a jeopardy assessment is made before the mailing of the deficiency notice, then in the case of a proceeding in the Tax Court, if the deficiency notice informs the taxpayer that an amount of accumulated earnings tax is included in the deficiency, such notice shall constitute the notification provided for in section 534(b) and paragraph (c) of § 1.534-2. Under such circumstances the statement described in section 534(c) and paragraph (d) of § 1.534-2 shall instead be included in the taxpayer's petition to the Tax Court, if the taxpayer desires to submit such statement. See paragraph (b) of § 1.534-2, relating to burden of proof on the taxpayer.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 8134 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 256

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

c ost

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 12 $ 1,020.0

0 $ 1,020.00 

### 166 $ 169,320.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of produc ts in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 169,320



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can als o be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Ac t:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Map 1
NFBR Mining Project Area

icinity Map
ae _
2a
b
nS
iB
(244) -
.
Greentom,

La Grande

(203)

Legend

oo
WZ, Project area
HEB ocai cities

[ ‘Wallowa Whitman NF

Highway
Interstate

7

| ind rg
\ 6 LS N
Mp ey oN

TN Phe

‘The Wallowa Whitman National Forest cannot assure
the reliability or suitability of this information
for a particular purpose. Original data was compiled
from various sources. Spatial information may not
‘meet National Map Standards. Scaled to fit the page
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00372-CV

Herminio CHAPA Jr., et al.,

Appellant

v.

MUSEUM REACH LOFTS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CV06009

Honorable Kevin Henderson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 27, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was originally due July 28, 2023 and was not filed. On August 8, 2023, 

we ordered appellant to file, by August 23, 2023: (1) his brief; and (2) a written response 

reasonably explaining his failure to timely file a brief. In our order, we cautioned the appellant that 

if he failed to timely file a brief and written response, we would dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). 

Appellant did not respond to our order. Because appellant has failed to timely file a brief, 

this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Jordan American Holdings, Inc. for the period ending
June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,178,224
<SECURITIES>                                   391,637
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,793,789
<PP&E>                                         270,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,089,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          390,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,540
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,658,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,089,461
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               523,999
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (328,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (328,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (328,976)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        



</TABLE>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 10

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax

deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home

should not be further restricted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mrs. ROUKEMA submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home should not be further

restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal,

which promotes social and economic benefits beyond the

benefits that accrue to the occupant of the home;

Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting

economic security and stability for American families;

Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is and should continue to be to encourage homeownership;
2

HCON 10 IH

Whereas the increase in the cost of housing over the last 10

years has been greater than the increase in family income;

Whereas, for the first time in 50 years, the percentage of

people in the United States owning their own homes has

declined;

Whereas the percentage of people in the United States between the ages of 25 and 29 who own their own home

has declined from 43 percent in 1976 to 38 percent

today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation’s housing policy for most

of this century and may well be the most important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by second homes is of crucial

importance to the economies of many communities;

Whereas the continued deductibility of interest paid on debt

secured by a first or second home has particular importance in promoting other desirable social goals, such as

education of young people; and

Whereas the Federal income tax deduction for interest paid

on debt secured by a first or second home has been limited twice in the last 6 years, and was further eroded as

a result of the 1990 Budget Act: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on
3

HCON 10 IH

1 debt secured by a first or second home should not be fur2 ther restricted.

Æ
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 116

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 29, 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1060,

3 to provide for the disclosure of lobbying activities to influ4 ence the Federal Government, and for other purposes, the

5 Secretary of the Senate shall make the following correc6 tions:

7 (1) In section 6(8), strike ‘‘6’’ and insert ‘‘7’’.
2

•HCON 116 RDS

1 (2) In section 9(7), insert ‘‘and’’ after the semi2 colon, in section 9(8), strike ‘‘; and’’ and insert a pe3 riod, and strike paragraph (9) of section 9.

4 (3) In section 12(c), strike ‘‘7’’ and insert ‘‘6’’.

5 (4) In section 15(a)(2), strike ‘‘8’’ and insert

6 ‘‘7’’.

7 (5) In section 15(b)(1), strike ‘‘, 5(a)(2),’’ and

8 in section 15(b)(2), strike ‘‘8’’ and insert ‘‘7’’.

9 (6) In section 24(b), strike ‘‘13, 14, 15, and

10 16’’ and insert ‘‘9, 10, 11, and 12’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 29,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****What you need to know aboutleukemia**
 
PDF | Mobi | epub
 
SuDoc:HE 20.3152:L 57/7/2013
Item Number:0507-G-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000920680
 
December 13, 2017
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Alluvial fans and near-surface subsidence in western Fresno 
County, California

#### Professional Paper 437-A

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp437A 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:11
B+H/PHOTOMATRIX BUSINESS AGREEMENT

This document amends the current business agreement in place between Bell+Howell
and Photomatrix dated 12-29-1997. Modifications to the agreement are as follows:

1.  PRICE PROTECTION

A. All existing  Bell+Howell  stock of the PS Series (5104,  5124, 5154) will be
price  protected  by  Photomatrix  for $1500 per unit  (TOTAL  PRICE  PROTECTION
PAYMENT NOT TO EXCEED $30,000).  Paymenet of the price protection to Bell+Howell
will be made as the units are sold from B+H inventory.

2.  CONDITIONS

A. Bell+Howell  will receive a 3 month  moratorium  (EFFECTIVE UNTIL 6-30-98) on
the purchase of additional scanners. After this moratorium (7-1-98), the channel
will be open for  Bell+Howell  and  Photomatrix  to sell to any account of their
choice.

B. Starting in July 98,  Bell+Howell  will purchase 3 each 9000 Series  scanners
per month for a  duration  of 9 months (27  TOTAL).  Release of orders by B+H to
Photomatrix will be documented by the 21st of each month.

BELL+HOWELL, IMPG                      Photomatrix Corporation

By:_____________________________       By:_____________________________________
   Bob Hunn                               Dell Glover
Title:  Product Marketing Manager      Title:  Vice President, Marketing & Sales
Date:  June 30, 1998                   Date:  June 30, 1998