Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 4, 2009 / Notices 38633 

ARRA ADJUSTMENTS TO FMAP Q3 FY09 

State 

FY08 

original 

FMAP 

FY09 

original 

FMAP 

Hold 

harmless FY 

09 

Hold 

harmless 

FY09 

FMAP 

with 

6.2%pt 

increase 

1st and 

2nd quarter FY09 

FMAP Adjust (incl 

HH–6.2– 

unemployment) 

3–Month 

average 

unemployment ending Mar 

2009 

Minimum 

unemployment 

Unemployment difference 

Unemployment tier 

Unemployment adjustment 

Q3 

FY09 

3nd quarter FY09 

FMAP adjust (incl 

HH–6.2– 

unemployment) 

Alabama ................................. 67.62 67.98 67.98 74.18 76.64 8.4 3.3 5.1 11.5 3.33 77.51 

Alaska .................................... 52.48 50.53 52.48 58.68 58.68 8.0 6.0 2.0 5.5 2.44 61.12 

Arizona ................................... 66.20 65.77 66.20 72.40 75.01 7.4 3.6 3.8 11.5 3.53 75.93 

Arkansas ................................ 72.94 72.81 72.94 79.14 79.14 6.4 4.8 1.6 5.5 1.32 80.46 

California ................................ 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 61.59 10.6 4.8 5.8 11.5 5.39 61.59 

Colorado ................................ 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 58.78 7.1 3.6 3.5 11.5 5.39 61.59 

Connecticut ............................ 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 60.19 7.4 4.3 3.1 8.5 3.99 60.19 

Delaware ................................ 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 60.19 7.2 3.3 3.9 11.5 5.39 61.59 

District of Columbia ............... 70.00 70.00 70.00 76.20 77.68 9.6 5.4 4.2 11.5 3.09 79.29 

Florida .................................... 56.83 55.40 56.83 63.03 67.64 9.4 3.3 6.1 11.5 4.61 67.64 

Georgia .................................. 63.10 64.49 64.49 70.69 73.44 8.9 4.3 4.6 11.5 3.73 74.42 

Hawaii .................................... 56.50 55.11 56.50 62.70 66.13 6.6 2.2 4.4 11.5 4.65 67.35 

Idaho ...................................... 69.87 69.77 69.87 76.07 78.37 6.8 2.8 4.0 11.5 3.11 79.18 

Illinois ..................................... 50.00 50.32 50.32 56.52 60.48 8.5 4.4 4.1 11.5 5.36 61.88 

Indiana ................................... 62.69 64.26 64.26 70.46 73.23 9.6 4.4 5.2 11.5 3.75 74.21 

Iowa ....................................... 61.73 62.62 62.62 68.82 68.82 5.0 3.7 1.3 0.0 0.00 68.82 

Kansas ................................... 59.43 60.08 60.08 66.28 66.28 5.9 4.0 1.9 5.5 2.03 68.31 

Kentucky ................................ 69.78 70.13 70.13 76.33 77.80 9.3 5.4 3.9 11.5 3.08 79.41 

Louisiana ................................ 72.47 71.31 72.47 78.67 80.01 5.6 3.5 2.1 5.5 1.34 80.01 

Maine ..................................... 63.31 64.41 64.41 70.61 72.40 7.9 4.4 3.5 11.5 3.74 74.35 

Maryland ................................ 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 58.78 6.6 3.4 3.2 8.5 3.99 60.19 

Massachusetts ....................... 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 58.78 7.6 4.4 3.2 8.5 3.99 60.19 

Michigan ................................. 58.10 60.27 60.27 66.47 69.58 12.1 6.7 5.4 11.5 4.21 70.68 

Minnesota .............................. 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 60.19 7.9 3.9 4.0 11.5 5.39 61.59 

Mississippi .............................. 76.29 75.84 76.29 82.49 83.62 9.1 6.0 3.1 8.5 1.75 84.24 

Missouri .................................. 62.42 63.19 63.19 69.39 71.24 8.4 4.7 3.7 11.5 3.88 73.27 

Montana ................................. 68.53 68.04 68.53 74.73 76.29 5.9 3.2 2.7 8.5 2.41 77.14 

Nebraska ................................ 58.02 59.54 59.54 65.74 65.74 4.5 2.8 1.7 5.5 2.05 67.79 

Nevada ................................... 52.64 50.00 52.64 58.84 63.93 10.0 4.2 5.8 11.5 5.09 63.93 

New Hampshire ..................... 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 56.20 5.7 3.4 2.3 5.5 2.58 58.78 

New Jersey ............................ 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 58.78 7.9 4.2 3.7 11.5 5.39 61.59 

New Mexico ........................... 71.04 70.88 71.04 77.24 77.24 5.5 3.5 2.0 5.5 1.42 78.66 

New York ............................... 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 58.78 7.5 4.3 3.2 8.5 3.99 60.19 

North Carolina ........................ 64.05 64.60 64.60 70.80 73.55 10.4 4.5 5.9 11.5 3.71 74.51 

North Dakota .......................... 63.75 63.15 63.75 69.95 69.95 4.2 3.0 1.2 0.0 0.00 69.95 

Ohio ....................................... 60.79 62.14 62.14 68.34 70.25 9.3 5.3 4.0 11.5 4.00 72.34 

Oklahoma ............................... 67.10 65.90 67.10 73.30 74.94 5.5 3.3 2.2 5.5 1.64 74.94 

Oregon ................................... 60.86 62.45 62.45 68.65 71.58 10.8 5.0 5.8 11.5 3.96 72.61 

Pennsylvania .......................... 54.08 54.52 54.52 60.72 63.05 7.5 4.3 3.2 8.5 3.60 64.32 

Rhode Island .......................... 52.51 52.59 52.59 58.79 63.89 10.4 4.8 5.6 11.5 5.10 63.89 

South Carolina ....................... 69.79 70.07 70.07 76.27 78.55 10.9 5.5 5.4 11.5 3.09 79.36 

South Dakota ......................... 60.03 62.55 62.55 68.75 68.75 4.6 2.7 1.9 5.5 1.89 70.64 

Tennessee ............................. 63.71 64.28 64.28 70.48 73.25 9.1 4.5 4.6 11.5 3.75 74.23 

Texas ..................................... 60.56 59.44 60.56 66.76 68.76 6.5 4.4 2.1 5.5 2.00 68.76 

Utah ....................................... 71.63 70.71 71.63 77.83 77.83 5.0 2.5 2.5 8.5 2.15 79.98 

Vermont ................................. 59.03 59.45 59.45 65.65 67.71 7.0 3.5 3.5 11.5 4.31 69.96 

Virginia ................................... 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 58.78 6.4 2.8 3.6 11.5 5.39 61.59 

Washington ............................ 51.52 50.94 51.52 57.72 60.22 8.4 4.4 4.0 11.5 5.22 62.94 

West Virginia .......................... 74.25 73.73 74.25 80.45 80.45 6.0 4.2 1.8 5.5 1.25 81.70 

Wisconsin ............................... 57.62 59.38 59.38 65.58 65.58 7.8 4.4 3.4 8.5 3.19 68.77 

Wyoming ................................ 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.20 56.20 4.0 2.8 1.2 0.0 0.00 56.20 

[FR Doc. E9–18544 Filed 7–31–09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Renewal of Charter for the Presidential 

Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS 

AGENCY: Department of Health and 

Human Services, Office of the Secretary, 

Office of Public Health and Science. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: As stipulated by the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 

U.S.C. Appendix 2), the U.S. 

Department of Health and Human 

Services is hereby announcing renewal 

of the charter for the Presidential 

Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS 

(PACHA). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Christopher Bates, Interim Executive 

Director, PACHA, Department of Health 

and Human Services, 200 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Room 443H; (202) 690– 

5560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PACHA 

was established by Executive Order 

12963, dated June 14, 1995, as amended 

by Executive Order 13009, dated June 

14, 1996; and Section 222 of the Public 

Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 217a). The 

Council was established to provide 

advice, information, and 

recommendations to the Secretary of 

Health and Human Services regarding 

programs and policies to promote 

effective prevention and cure of HIV 

disease and AIDS. The functions of the 

Council shall be solely advisory in 

nature. 

Since PACHA was established, 

renewal of its charter has been carried 

out at the appropriate intervals as 

stipulated by FACA. The previous 

Council charter was scheduled to expire 

on July 27, 2009. On July 24, 2009, the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

38634 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 4, 2009 / Notices 

Secretary of Health and Human Services 

approved for the Council charter to be 

renewed. Renewal of the PACHA 

charter provides authorization for the 

Council to operate until July 27, 2011. 

A copy of the Council charter is 

available on the PACHA Web site at 

http://www.pacha.gov. A copy of the 

Council charter also can be obtained by 

accessing the FACA database that is 

maintained by the Committee 

Management Secretariat under the 

General Services Administration. The 

Web site address for the FACA database 

is http://fido.gov/facadatabase. 

Dated: July 28, 2009. 

Christopher H. Bates, 

Interim Executive Director, Presidential 

Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS. 

[FR Doc. E9–18572 Filed 8–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150–43–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

[Docket No. FDA–2007–D–0372] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Announcement of Office of 

Management and Budget Approval; 

Adverse Event Reporting and 

Recordkeeping for Dietary 

Supplements as Required by the 

Dietary Supplement and 

Nonprescription Drug Consumer 

Protection Act 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is announcing 

that a collection of information entitled 

Adverse Event Reporting and 

Recordkeeping for Dietary Supplements 

as Required by the Dietary Supplement 

and Nonprescription Drug Consumer 

Protection Act has been approved by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel Gittleson, Office of Information 

Management (HFA–710), Food and Drug 

Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 

Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–5156. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Federal Register of September 15, 2008 

(73 FR 53252), the agency announced 

that the proposed information collection 

had been submitted to OMB for review 

and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and 

a person is not required to respond to, 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. OMB has now approved the 

information collection and has assigned 

OMB control number 0910–0635. The 

approval expires on May 31, 2012. A 

copy of the supporting statement for this 

information collection is available on 

the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain. 

Dated: July 28, 2009. 

Jeffrey Shuren, 

Associate Commissioner for Policy and 

Planning. 

[FR Doc. E9–18532 Filed 8–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–S 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention 

[60Day–09–09CH] 

Proposed Data Collections Submitted 

for Public Comment and 

Recommendations 

In compliance with the requirement 

of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for 

opportunity for public comment on 

proposed data collection projects, the 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic 

summaries of proposed projects. To 

request more information on the 

proposed projects or to obtain a copy of 

the data collection plans and 

instruments, call 404–639–5960 and 

send comments to Maryam I. Daneshvar, 

CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer, 

1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, 

GA 30333 or send an e-mail to 

omb@cdc.gov. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. Written comments should 

be received within 60 days of this 

notice. 

Proposed Project 

A Controlled Evaluation of Expect 

Respect Support Groups (ERSG): 

Preventing and Interrupting Teen Dating 

Violence among At-Risk Middle and 

High School Students—New—National 

Center for Injury Prevention and Control 

(NCIPC), Division of Violence 

Prevention (DVP), Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention (CDC). 

Background and Brief Description 

The prevalence and consequences of 

teen dating violence make it a public 

health concern that requires early and 

effective prevention. To date, only three 

prevention strategies—Safe Dates, the 

Youth Relationships Project, and 4th 

R—have demonstrated reductions in 

dating violence behaviors in rigorous, 

controlled evaluations. In order to 

protect young people and build an 

evidence-base of effective prevention 

strategies, evaluation of additional 

programs is needed, including those 

programs currently in the field. Expect 

Respect Support Groups (provided by 

SafePlace) are currently in use in the 

Austin Independent School District and 

demonstrated promising results in an 

uncontrolled program evaluation, 

suggesting a controlled evaluation is 

warranted to more rigorously examine 

program effects. The proposed study has 

one primary aim and two exploratory 

aims. The primary aim is to evaluate the 

effectiveness of Expect Respect Support 

Groups (ERSG) to prevent and reduce 

teen dating violence and increase 

healthy conflict resolution skills 

reported by at-risk male and female 

middle and high school students 

compared to at-risk students in control 

schools who do not receive ERSG. The 

exploratory aims are: (1) To evaluate 

whether or not the effectiveness of 

ERSG is enhanced by the presence of a 

universal, school-wide prevention 

program, and (2) To examine 

moderators and mediators of targeted 

and universal teen dating violence 

interventions, such as biological sex and 

history of abuse at intake. 

The proposed evaluation will use a 

quasi-experimental/non-randomized 

design in which a convenience sample 

of participants in schools receiving 

targeted prevention services are 

compared to students in control schools 

in which no dating violence prevention 

services are available. Control schools 

will be selected that have characteristics 

(e.g., risk status, socio-economic status) 

similar to the Austin Independent 

School District intervention schools. 

Based on past, uncontrolled program 

evaluation of Expect Respect Support 

groups, we anticipate that in the Austin 

Independent School District and 

neighboring district(s), 800 students will 

undergo an intake assessment, of whom 

600 will be eligible for Expect Respect 

Support groups and will complete the 

baseline survey. We expect 400 students 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES