alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KaiserGroup Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), we, John T. Grigsby, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Marijo L.Ahlgrimm, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 14,  2003 |   /s/ John T. Grigsby, Jr. |                                                   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                            | John  T. Grigsby, Jr.,                                 |
|                  |                            | President  and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                  |                            |
|                  |                            |
|                  |   /s/ Marijo L. Ahlgrimm   |                                                   |
|                  |                            | Marijo  L. Ahlgrimm,                                   |
|                  |                            | Executive  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|                       |                                 |                                                        |  |

 

----
Swanson, Brian (OST) From: Andy Sajor [andy_sajor@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:40 AM To: Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) Subject: Cape Air vs. Cogan
Dear Sirs: Having flown CapeAir many times, I found the aircraft to be quite acceptable, the price more than fair, and the schedule extremely convenient. IfCape Air is a commuter airline that is supposed to serve the needs ofour local area, not that ofthe greater Montreal population, why would want to paymore for less? Just to have a bigger aircraft? I think the local populationwould'weigh in with a firm No! Tobegin with, Cape Airflights are seldomfull, and iftheir loads increase, I understand they are ready to add capacity. As I understand it, EAS is designed to aid a communitythat would notnormally be able to sustain frequent air service without a subsidy, Why would we waste this valuable resource on a companywith a poortrack record, when we have one operating here with a proven one? Please consider all aspects ofthe issue before you pull the plug on Cape Air. This issue can always berevisited ifthe community needs increase orchange. Sincerely Andrew Sajor 41 Trafalgar Drive Plattsburgh, NY 12901

1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin T. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Kevin T. Thompson       
|Kevin T. Thompson           
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     



November 5, 2004
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

oIut.0 c. MIWW 

A-.- 
i 

Fpn . Xlter C. ?~:oodwnrd, 

Article 7064a, 

lature reads 8s follows: 

T'ase 2 

as amnded by the 46th&egti- 

*Every group of individuals, society, 

association or oorporation dcmici&ed in the 

State of Texas twnsaatlng the busiress of 

life, aooldent, or lire and accident, health . 

and eccident insurance for profit, or for 

mutual bene 'It or protoatlon, shall at the time of filing its annulil a&at6Dlbnt mbport 

to th6 Bard at fne\raanoo oOnieSion6ra th6 gro66 

-tufQremlum5rrael~rrc8Iarppoothe 

llY66ofmmull5r48illingardumlull64Lnthle .. 

stat6aiulrIgth8plw6dlngy6arandwah~~m& 

it*lumpayth6faxll6r6ial6Yiel¶upon~ 

glvss pramon for 6wh klD& ef s.wurenu6 rriftsn; 

the proYlsicm6 of thla Aut alall not ,appl.y to fdmwnal - ol=ganlzations UT ,~uul6tlea wn¶t uait th4ss.r lEaprbasship to on6 06ullpat~all. 

The report ot the -8s pramiun raedpts al&l 

bemadeupontheawurndMmentattnu(8~ 

plalulpal offia6re, Dsduutiontl fxwi the gnwp 

p&lm lwrblpt5aha3lbeallolda~uy~Qt 

hillvldual6, eooi6ty, aa8ouiatioxt. er uorporatlon 

of an aagul.e~tXon ooet uf all oi the f-t year*8 

praxiium~,axa~tthatan induatrialbus%noWsui?h 

aompanlss shall be penaltted to deduat one anil 

one-half (141 times the agpunt or the tinat year*6 
prealums as acquisition costs. Upon receipt 

by it, of the sworn statements above provided 

for, the Board of Insurance Cotissioners shall 

certify to the State Treasurer the m:ountoof 

taxes due by each of such group of Individuals. 

society, assoolatlon, or co poration, which tax 

shall be pald to the Sate .reasurer on or before the 1st of Karch following and the Treasurer 

shall Issue his recei'pt therefor as evidence of 

the payment of such taxes. 170 such group of lndlvtiuals, society, association, or COrpOI=tiOn 

shall reaelve a permit to do business until all 

suahtaxes~epa~d. l&4 tax48 4.foreeaid tatall 

4ontttitttt6 all tax68 atui liOette6 f64e uoll60tl~l6 

'uttaert3t4lrnaorthitt~tuegaitt6tadJnwh 

ittmtr6aee er@ttmat1utts, uxwpt the *44s)?rwia6d 

wet quota tzrn wordS*& l4!@+ea, Vol. 6. page 8514 

as folltmtt 

Tl9nb 6onalderrtlon'pald for a poliay af 

lnsunnee 1s aallsd th4 lLmnllim* 

aTheflrstpre&ummmns thsffratpqmant 

or pmamlum as dlstingni&@ fnrmtha first annual 

prdllDI." 

First p&lay m mana yearfor wbS.oh pOl.lOy w&s 

fhtt lastted,. Words B Phnrsss, VQ& 3, page 685.. dlrpo 800 
Hon. Wdter C. Woohard, pat34 4 

the oases of Carter vs. Standard fnmranoe ~oqm.nyLZ38 ' 

Paa. 259; American National Insuranoe Qnqx3ny vs. Thcnnpson, 

186 SW 254. 

Artlale 7064a, sup?& spaoliloally provides that 

the deductions iram,the gross p&urn receipts shall be 

allowed any gmup or +llviduals, saalety, assoolatlon, or 

oorporatlon of an aoqulaitlon sot& of all th4 rirst par%4 

pretdtmle uxaept, that on lnatlstrpkl btlel4ee "uf4o~
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

132) ll-K- (B)-122 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:52 AM Sheet 132 of 325 
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC jft Q O H 7 

July 21,\1983 

i 

II-K-(B)-122 

Mr. Robert Short 

Economic Analysis Branch " 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Drop-12 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Subject: EPA Contract No. 68-02-5564, Work Assignment #8 

Dear Robert: 

As I noted in my letter of July 15, 1983, there are relatively few new 

coal-fired industrial boilers selecting scrubbers in recent IFCAM Base 

Case projections. Only about 10-15 percent of new coal-fired industrial 

boilers less than 250 MMBtu/hr selected scrubbers in the Base Case in 

the March 1983 or July 8, 1983 projections. Boilers that select scrubbers with PM emissions control capability (e.g., lime spray drying in 

the July 8, 1983 projections or the dual alkali/single mechanical collector system in the March 1983 set of IFCAM projections) in the Base 

Case will not be subject to a cost increase under the proposed PM NSPS. 

In the July 8, 1983 Base Case IFCAM projections, only four new coalfired industrial boilers less than 250 MMBtu/hr chose to scrub a bituminous coal type (which was the cheapest coal type in all five cases) 

with a lime spray drying FGD system as opposed to selecting a more 

expensive compliance coal type with a side stream separator. Scrubbing 

was not selected for any bituminous coal boiler which could use a single 

or dual mechanical collector. The attached table summarizes the cost 

differences for each of these four boilers. 

If scrubbing was not permitted in the Base Case, the first two boilers 

in the attached table Would not have selected the compliance coal type. 

Natural gas would have been chosen for the first boiler and residual 

fuel oil would have been chosen for the second boiler. 

Please call me if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Tim Hogan fj 

TH:mk 

Attachment 

cc: Al Wehe 

Economic s / Engineerin g 
P.3 

COMPARISON OF COMPLIANCE STRATEGIES 

FOR NEW INDUSTRIAL COAL-FIRED BOILERSa 

Size 

(MMBtu/hr) 

125 

125 

175 

175 

Capacity 

utilization 

rate (%) 

65 

65 

65 

65 

s

. 

compliance 

coal type 

(lb SO /MMBtu) 

0.80 

0.95 

2.10 

2.85 

Difference in 

(1982 $/MMBtu) 

0.76 

0.42 

0.49 

0.35 

aft er-tax NPV 

(000 $1982) 

541 

299 

488 

349 

Base Case. Low excess air on all new industrial boilers. Consistent 

with IFCAM projections dated July 8, 1983. 

Cost of SO„ compliance coal type less cost of scrubbing the cheapest 

coal in the region (with at least 50 percent S02 removal), including 

boiler, pollution control equipment and fuel expenses.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1995                    
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                            34,520
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       33,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  89,919
<PP&E>                                           325,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                   153,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   279,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             42,713
<BONDS>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     279,252
<SALES>                                          230,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 230,742
<CGS>                                            157,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    208,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    6,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                       2,060
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                4,277
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       4,277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION


     To my knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September
30, 2002 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Tri-County Financial Corporation.



                                    By: /s/ Michael L. Middleton
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Michael L. Middleton
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer



                                    By: /s/ William J. Pasenelli
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        William J. Pasenelli
                                        Executive Vice President and  Chief
                                        Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18

- 2321

_____________________________

E ARL R AYMOND C AMPOS ,
Appellant,

v.

J OANA C AMPOS ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. J

. Lee Marsh , Judge.

March 26, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.
W ETHERELL , R AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Emilian “Ian” Bucataru of Bucataru Law Firm PLLC

, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Jerry L. Rumph, Jr. and Jennifer L. Sweeting of Sweeting & Rumph, P.A.

, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4461 — Accor Services France/Groupe Caisse d'Épargne/Accor Emploi Services Universel JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 298/10)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certificationof Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuantto Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended**

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted), Arthur O. Whipple,the Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Silicon StorageTechnology, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

1.               TheCompany’s Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2006, to which this Certification isattached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

2.               Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his handhereto as of the 9th day of November, 2006.
| /s/ Arthur O. Whipple                               |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |
| Arthur O. Whipple                                   |
| Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has beenprovided to Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and will be retained by SiliconStorage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to whichit relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission andis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespectiveof any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
October 22, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 22nd day of October, 2015.

10-15-00192-CVIN THE INTEREST OF A.C., A CHILD - ON APPEAL FROM THE 272ND  DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 14-002213-CV-272 – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment of the court below; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the court below be, and hereby is, affirmed.  It is further ordered that costs of appeal be, and hereby are, adjudged against Appellants Eric Cabrera and Jennifer Cabrera although they are exempt from payment due to their affidavit of inability to pay costs, and that this decision be certified below for observance.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         437,477
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,015,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,831,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          498,400
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,333,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,831,991
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               63,335
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   53,780
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00


</TABLE>
39527.

#### CONSOLIDATED UNDERWRITERS et al. v. SMITH.

Decided May 28, 1962

Rehearing denied June 18, 1962.

*Woodruff, Latimer, Saveli, Lane .& Williams, John M. Williams,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. F. Blanks,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The claimant was originally injured in March, 1959, when he hurt his back when he jumped from a scaffold after losing his balance and notified his employer of such accidental injury, but no claim was filed with the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation to recover compensation as a result of such injury during the statutory period. Thereafter, according to the claimant’s testimony adduced on the hearing, claimant continued to have trouble with his back when lifting five-gallon cans of solvent, etc., until he was no longer able to continue his work. On direct examination he was asked if he made a report to his foreman and he answered *168that he did and when asked the nature of the report he replied: “I told him, I was having trouble with my back. I told him I couldn’t pick up those cans and get upon the scaffold, and I got to where I just couldn’t hardly go.” On cross-examination he testified that he told his foreman that his back was giving him trouble, and when asked if he ever told him that he had injured his back on the job outside of March 4, 1959, he replied: “I don’t know, don’t believe, I am not sure of that.” No other evidence was adduced to show that the notice required by *Code*§ 114-303 was given the employer. As was said in *Fountain v. Ga. Marble Co.,*95 Ga. App. 21, 22 (96 SE2d 656), “While it is true that the evidence presented at the hearing supported the findings of fact that the employer had notice that the claimant was absent from work due to a back injury, where the employer had no notice that such injury was the result of an event, which took place in the course of the claimant’s employment . . . this notice did not comply with *Code*§ 114-303.” See also *Smith v. Continental Cas. Co.,*102 Ga. App. 559 (116 SE2d 888); *Complete Auto Transit v. Reavis,*105 Ga. App. 364 (124 SE2d 491); and *Royal Indem. Co. v. Coulter,*213 Ga. 277 (98 SE2d 899). There being no evidence adduced to show that the employer had any notice sufficient to put it on notice to make an investigation if it desired to do so, the award granting compensation was not supported by the evidence and the judgment of the superior court affirming such award must be reversed.

What is above held does not conflict with the decision in *Ideal Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ray,*92 Ga. App. 273 (88 SE2d 428), cited by the board in its award, for, as there held, a back injury is compensable where a sudden injury does not take place (where the disability results from continually lifting heavy objects), but the statutory notice of an accidental injury must be given to the employer.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on form 10-QSB of Edd Helms Group,  Inc.
and Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
we, W. Edd Helms, Jr., President and Chief Executive  Officer,  Dean A. Goodson,
Chief  Financial  Officer,  and L. Wade Helms,  Executive  Vice President of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of our
knowledge:

     (1)The  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Date: February 21, 2006        /s/  W. Edd Helms, Jr.
      -----------------       ----------------------
                              W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief
                              Executive Officer

      February 21, 2006       /s/  Dean A. Goodson
      -----------------       --------------------
                              Dean A. Goodson, Chief Financial Officer

      February 21, 2006       /s/  L. Wade Helms
      -----------------       ------------------
                              L. Wade Helms, Executive Vice President