alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|US
    Bank(logo) | All
    of us serving you
|----------------- | -------------------------





Annual Statement of Compliance

Bank of America Merrill Lynch Commercial
Mortgage Trust 2015-UBS7



VIA: EMAIL



Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc.

One Bryant Park

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Leland F. Bunch, III

leland.f.bunch@baml.com



Ellington Management Group, LLC

53 Forest Avenue

Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870

Attention: Leo Huang

lhuang@ellington.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com



Re:	      Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1,
2015 (the “Agreement”) between Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc., as Depositor, Midland
Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha
Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar,
Authenticating Agent and Custodian.



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President
of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:



(1) A review of the activities
of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date: March 7, 2017



|U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|By:                                                         
|                                                            
|
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 62

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the

name of the Senate in Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., et al. v.

Federal Communications Commission, et al. and consolidated cases.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus

curiae in the name of the Senate in Turner Broadcasting

System, Inc., et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al. and consolidated cases.

Whereas, in the case of Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., et

al. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al., No.

92–2247, and consolidated cases Nos. 92–2292, 92–

2494, 92–2495, 92–2558, pending before a three-judge

court of the United States District Court for the District

of Columbia, the plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of sections 4 and 5 of the Cable Television

Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Pub.

L. No. 102–385, 106 Stat. 1460, 1471–81, which require

cable operators to carry the signals of certain local com-
2

SRES 62 ATS

mercial and noncommercial educational television stations; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(c), 706(a), and 713(a) of

the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(c),

288e(a), and 288l(a) (1988), the Senate may direct its

Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the name of the

Senate in any legal action in which the powers and responsibilities of Congress under the Constitution are

placed in issue: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to appear as amicus curiae on behalf of the Senate in

3 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., et al. v. Federal Com4 munications Commission, et al., and consolidated cases in

5 support of the constitutionality of sections 4 and 5 of the

6 Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition

7 Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102–385, 106 Stat. 1460, 1471–

8 81.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50304

Summary Calendar

 

RANDELL J. REDMOND,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

D.J. BRZOZOWSKI, Sheriff, Individually

and in his Official Capacity; GONZALES

COUNTY COMMISSIONER’S COURT; BRIGGS, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CA-342-RBO

--------------------

November 5, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Randell Redmond (“Redmond”), Texas state prisoner #727110,

filed a pro se lawsuit, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging

that Sheriff Donald Brzozowski, the Gonzalez County

Commissioner’s Court, and Officer Ken Briggs violated his

constitutional rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. 

The parties consented to proceed before the magistrate judge for

all purposes. The magistrate judge granted the defendants’

motions for summary judgment and dismissed Redmond’s claims with 
No. 98-50304

-2-

prejudice as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). We have

reviewed the briefs and the record and conclude that granting

summary judgment in favor of the appellees was correct for

essentially the same reasons set forth by the magistrate judge in

his comprehensive opinion. See Redmond v. Brzozowski, No. SA-96-

CA-342-RBO (W.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 1998).

AFFIRMED.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 011

Attachment Name

Attachment 11 LaPbTiZrO

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.A, id. (#4)

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

CONSi 10317786855351
00~

00

0

(I)D

0~ - U 

0 Cd~~O

00

0 79

04 0 c) r

* ~ ~~~ S ._____________ 0 

0n

5) 0 c,-

O0

0 * SO

0 +, 0

00- in0-,

cz~
00

00 i

-4 I

C2 C4

6 to 

0 0. 42 o d) co

(DQ

Cl) 40 l

-05

0) 0i N cisL

00

ol 0.0. c

-o0 0 C 0-

0 *l 0

M V

4- 0 ~t

A CA

c - ~IC40 . C) "

N um

o ~~; (U(A8,>

60 0 00
00

00

Cf)

0

z

0

0z0

cl >

> a)

Sl u 0 0 0

00c 0c

c 0 o 0) in,

0 ) 1))
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3/21/00 10Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          49,240                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  642,485                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,981                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,272,795                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,969,070                       0
<PP&E>                                         134,223                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,823                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,101,696                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,409,526                       0
<BONDS>                                        469,398                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           580                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     213,212                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,101,696                       0
<SALES>                                      2,842,203               5,681,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,842,203               5,681,585
<CGS>                                        2,710,797               5,430,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,710,797               5,430,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                80,292                 154,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,912                   2,615
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,922                  22,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,192                  74,029
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,893                  28,131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,299                  45,898
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,299                  45,898
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47                     .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47                     .89


</TABLE>
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES




Executive Officers’ Bonus Plans



The following summarizes the terms of the bonus arrangements approved by our Compensation Committee
with respect to our executive officers:



MALCOLM S. MORRIS, as Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer, shall receive in
addition to his salary, 1% on the first $20,000,000 of the consolidated pretax income (calculated
after deducting minority interests) of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its
stockholder, .75% of the pretax profits from $20,000,001 to $40,000,000, .50% of the pretax profits
from $40,000,001 to $60,000,000 and .35% of the pretax profits exceeding $60,000,000.



STEWART MORRIS, JR., as President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, shall receive in addition to his
salary, 1% on the first $20,000,000 of the consolidated pretax income (calculated after deducting
minority interests) of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder, .75% of the
pretax profits from $20,000,001 to $40,000,000, .50% of the pretax profits from $40,000,001 to
$60,000,000 and .35% of the pretax profits exceeding $60,000,000.



MAX CRISP, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, shall receive in addition to
his salary, .50% of the first $50,000,000 of the consolidated pretax income (calculated after
deducting minority interests) of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder,
..40% of the pretax profits from $50,000,001 to $75,000,000, .30% of the pretax profits from
$75,000,001 to $100,000,000 and .20% of the pretax profits exceeding $100,000,000. Mr. Max Crisp’s
compensation from base salary plus bonus may not exceed 75% of the total base salary plus bonus
earned by a Chief Executive Officer.



E. ASHLEY SMITH, as Executive Vice President — General Counsel, shall receive in addition to his
salary $125,000 in bonus compensation. In addition, in 2006 Mr. E. Ashley Smith will receive a
one-time bonus of $67,500 in recognition of his efforts related to certain initiatives.



MATTHEW W. MORRIS, as Senior Vice President — Planning and Development, shall receive in addition
to his salary, .15% of the consolidated pretax income (calculated after deducting minority
interests) of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder. In addition, Mr.
Matthew W. Morris may be eligible to receive up to $25,000 of discretionary bonuses based on the
completion of certain projects and the approval of Mr. Stewart Morris, Jr.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 186 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 186

   To authorize testimony by and representation of Senate employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 8 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

 Mr. Hollings (for Mr. Mitchell) (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize testimony by and representation of Senate employees.

Whereas, in the case of Haywood Galbreath v. Associated Press, Case No. CV 
        933132, pending in the United States District Court for the Central 
        District of California, the defendant Associated Press seeks the 
        testimony of Maurice Johnson, an employee of the Senate who is the 
        Superintendent of the Press Photographers' Gallery of the Senate;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2) (1988), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent committees, Members, officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to testimony and documents provided 
        in their official capacity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Maurice Johnson, and any other employee of the 
Senate from whom testimony or the production of documents is required, 
are authorized to testify and to produce documents in the case of 
Haywood Galbreath v. Associated Press, except concerning matters for 
which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
Maurice Johnson, and any other employee of the Senate whose testimony 
is required, in connection with the testimony and production of 
documents authorized under section 1.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,478,510
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    224,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                      16,000
<INVENTORY>                                    3,026,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,016,733
<PP&E>                                         4,305,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,959,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,449,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            307,839
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,146
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,914,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,449,674
<SALES>                                        7,134,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,134,301
<CGS>                                          2,048,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,048,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,657,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                29,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (94,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (31,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (125,347)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                        (96,045)
<NET-INCOME>                                    (221,391)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.04)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 191 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 191

  To recognize and honor the Filipino World War II veterans for their 
 defense of democratic ideals and their important contribution to the 
                        outcome of World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1996

  Mr. Gilman (for himself, Mr. Filner, Mr. Stump, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. 
   Solomon, Mr. Dornan, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Flanagan, Mr. 
 Talent, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Abercrombie, Mrs. Mink of Hawaii, Mr. Evans, 
 Mr. Miller of California, and Mr. Gutierrez) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To recognize and honor the Filipino World War II veterans for their 
 defense of democratic ideals and their important contribution to the 
                        outcome of World War II.

Whereas the Commonwealth of the Philippines was strategically located and thus 
        vital to the defense of the United States during World War II;
Whereas the military forces of the Commonwealth of the Philippines were called 
        into the United States Armed Forces during World War II by Executive 
        order and were put under the command of General Douglas MacArthur;
Whereas the participation of the military forces of the Commonwealth of the 
        Philippines in the battles of Bataan and Corregidor and in other smaller 
        skirmishes delayed and disrupted the initial Japanese effort to conquer 
        the Western Pacific;
Whereas that delay and disruption allowed the United States the vital time to 
        prepare the forces which were needed to drive the Japanese from the 
        Western Pacific and to defeat Japan;
Whereas after the recovery of the Philippine Islands from Japan, the United 
        States was able to use the strategically located Commonwealth of the 
        Philippines as a base from which to launch the final efforts to defeat 
        Japan;
Whereas every American deserves to know the important contribution that the 
        military forces of the Commonwealth of the Philippines made to the 
        outcome of World War II; and
Whereas the Filipino World War II veterans deserve recognition and honor for 
        their important contribution to the outcome of World War II: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress recognizes and honors the Filipino World War II 
veterans for their defense of democratic ideals and their important 
contribution to the outcome of World War II.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20877

USDC No. H-97-CV-2335

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RUBEN DARIO SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

---------------------

July 2, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ruben Dario Sanchez, federal prisoner #60156-079, seeks to

appeal the district court’s dismissal of his motion to vacate his

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. This court must examine

the basis of its subject-matter jurisdiction on its own motion if

necessary. Giannakos v. M/V BRAVO TRADER, 762 F.2d 1295, 1297

(5th Cir. 1985). Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act (AEDPA), a prisoner seeking to file a second or

successive § 2255 motion in the district court must apply for

leave to do so from this court. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A),
O R D E R

No. 97-20877

- 2 -

2255. Because Sanchez had not obtained prior permission from

this court to file his successive § 2255 motion, the district

court was without jurisdiction to entertain his successive § 2255

motion. See id. A certificate of appealability is GRANTED, and

the district court’s judgment is VACATED. The case is REMANDED

to the district court for the entry of a judgment dismissing

Sanchez’s successive § 2255 motion for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction.
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 180

Commending the Americans who served the United States during the period

known as the Cold War.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 1996

Mr. LAZIO of New York (for himself, Mr. DELAY, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. STUMP,

and Mr. PARKER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on National Security, and in addition to

the Committees on International Relations, and Intelligence (Permanent

Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the Americans who served the United States

during the period known as the Cold War.

Whereas the most dangerous military competition in the history of mankind has come to a close without a nuclear

holocaust;

Whereas men and women in the armed forces, intelligence

community, and foreign service community of the United

States faithfully performed their duties during the period

known as the Cold War;

Whereas many of these persons were isolated from family and

friends and served under arduous conditions in far away
2

HCON 180 IH

lands in order to preserve peace and harmony throughout

the world;

Whereas these persons performed their duty in the most successful, extended, military competition in the history of

mankind and ensured that weapons of mass destruction,

capable of destroying all humanity, were never released;

Whereas the self-discipline and dedication of these persons

were fundamental to the prevention of a Super Power

conflict; and

Whereas the silent determination of these persons brought a

peaceful victory to all the people of the world: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress acknowledges the service and

3 sacrifices of these Americans who contributed to historic

4 victory in the Cold War.

Æ