alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Notice on letters of nomination.

# SUMMARY:

The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA) established the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC) to review Medicaid and CHIP access and payment policies and to advise Congress on issues affecting Medicaid and CHIP. CHIPRA gave the Comptroller General of the United States responsibility for appointing MACPAC's 17 members, with initial appointments to be made not later than January 1, 2010. For these appointments, I am announcing the following: Letters of nomination and resumes will be accepted through October 1st, 2009 to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees prior to appointment of members.

# ADDRESSES:

                        GAO: 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20548 or                         *MACPACappointments@gao.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

GAO: Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800, Public Law 111-3, Section 506; 42 U.S.C. 1396.

Gene L. Dodaro,

Acting Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. E9-18596 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASA ATD-1 Avionics Phase 2: Flight Test PlanThe purpose of this flight test plan is to describe procedures for conducting FIM operations with the FIM Avionics Systems installed in two test aircraft.Document ID20170004499Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBrown, John A.*(Boeing Research and Technology Seattle, WA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 9, 2017Publication DateMarch 1, 2017Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2017-219595NF1676L-26806Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL13AA03BTASK: NNL15AB46TWBS: WBS 330693.04.10.07.09Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170004499.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 1.871-6 Duty of withholding agent to determine status of alien payees.

For the obligation of a withholding agent to withhold the tax imposed by this section, see chapter 3 of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder.

[T.D. 8734, 62 FR 53416, Oct. 14, 1997]
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 17

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any

constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, for the purposes of any constitutional

3 amendment requiring a balanced budget, the appropriate

4 committees of the House and the Senate shall report to

5 their respective Houses implementing legislation to

6 achieve a balanced budget without increasing the receipts

7 or reducing the disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and

8 Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disabil9 ity Insurance Trust Fund to achieve that goal.

Passed the House of Representatives January 25,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
First Amendment to the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan



 
Exhibit 10.04c 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 2005 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN 
 FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OF PRAXAIR, INC.

 Section 5.10 of the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Praxair, Inc., is hereby amended in its entirety
as follows, effective as of October 24, 2006: 
 “5.10 Adjustment in the Event of Recapitalization, etc. 

In the event of any change in the outstanding shares of the Company by reason of any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger,
consolidation, combination or exchange of shares or other similar corporate change or in the event of any special distribution to the stockholders, the Committee shall make equitable adjustments in the number of shares and prices per share
applicable to Stock Option grants then outstanding and in the number of shares which are available thereafter for Stock Option grants or other awards, both under the Plan as a whole and with respect to individuals and award type. Such adjustments
shall be made in a manner that the Committee determines is necessary and appropriate, and shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes of the Plan.” 
  

	
	October 24, 2006
	
	PRAXAIR, INC.
H

" î

H î

"

H î "

H

"î

?

?

300

300

300

300

250

250

250

300

250

250

250 250

250

250

300

250

250

San Rafael

Ranch Airport

FM-755

RANCH ROAD 755

OLD CHURCH RD

KELSY BASS RD

BAZO

N RANCH RD

FM-755

B

R

O

O

K

S

C

O

JIM

H

O

G

G

C

O

B

R

O

O

K

S

C

O

STARR CO STARR CO

BROOKS CO

JIM

H

O

G

G

C

O

JIM HOGG CO

Santa

Elena

Kelsey Bass Oil Field

Blanco Windmill

Estrella Windmill

Mirasol Windmill

Mercedes Windmill

Kelsey Bass Camp

La Particion Ranch

Escondido Windmill

Esteritos Windmill

Kelsey

Windmill

Old Encinitos

Windmill

SantaTeresa

Windmill

Casa Blanca

Windmill

Corrales Windmill

La

Gloria

Agua

Nueva SE

Santa

Elena NW

Agua

Nueva

Santa

Elena

La

Reforma

Tacubaya

Santa

Elena SE

San

Isidro

68

52'

22'

53

000m

22' E

800

5

29

45'

30"

47'

E 000m 5

16

5

47'

16

5 5

50'

5

50'

29

840 000

29

29

55

29

N

FEET

5

29

FEET

98° 51 5

29

5

30"

65

5 56

51

98°

26°52'

000

67

1

29

98° 27'

5

64

60

29

5 000

000

29

30"

000m

59

29

29

5

65

29

29

30"

5

29

59

000m

30"

62

30"

29

29

45'

020

29

29

5

30"

5

26° 54 57

60

57

29

5

25'

29

50

71

25'

66

30'

5

70

26° 61 5

68

29

58

5

60

59

29

63

53

61

29

98°

29

66

30'

69

52 5

52

990 59

61

63

72

26°

69

5

56

71

60

FEET

29

30"

29

N

29

61

27'

70

72

50

67

62

64

FEET

55

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

SANTA ELENA QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

SANTA ELENA, TX

2012

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Imagery..................................................NAIP, April 2010

Roads..............................................©2006-2012 TomTom

Names..........................................................GNIS, 2012

Hydrography....................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2008

Boundaries....................Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2012

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 14R

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983 (south zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.7

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

NQ

14R

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2012 MAGNETIC NORTH

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 15 ́

5 MILS

4° 53 ́

87 MILS
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 198

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the first annual Congressional

Family Picnic.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1996

Mr. GINGRICH (for himself, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. CARDIN, and

Mr. GILCHREST) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the first

annual Congressional Family Picnic.

Whereas the Member’s and Family Room is an official entity

of the House of Representatives, administratively under

the Office of the Clerk of the House;

Whereas the purpose of the Member’s and Family Room is

to facilitate family life in congressional families, and to

promote collegial relationships among the sitting Member

of Congress; and

Whereas a family picnic on the Capitol grounds would promote the purposes of the Member’s and Family Room:

Now, therefore, be it
2

HCON 198 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF FIRST ANNUAL CONGRES4 SIONAL FAMILY PICNIC ON CAPITOL

5 GROUNDS.

6 The Advisory Board of the Member’s and Family

7 Room (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Advisory

8 Board’’) shall be permitted to sponsor an event, the first

9 annual Congressional Family Picnic, on the Capitol

10 grounds on July 30, 1996, or on such other date as the

11 Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Presi12 dent pro tempore of the Senate may jointly designate.

13 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

14 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

15 be arranged under conditions to be prescribed by the Ar16 chitect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

17 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

18 For the purposes of this resolution, the Advisory

19 Board is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds,

20 subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol,

21 such structures and equipment (including cooking equip22 ment) as may be required for the event to be carried out

23 under this resolution.
3

HCON 198 IH

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

3 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar4 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

5 under this resolution.

Æ
EXHIBIT 4.46

                                                                   June 20, 2003

To the Holders
      of the 6% / 12% Secured Notes
      (formerly the 20% Secured Notes)

      We hereby seek your approval for the extension of the maturity date of the
6% / 12% Secured Notes from July 1, 2003 until September 30, 2003. This
extension will enable us to satisfy the Notes in a manner that meets the needs
of both the Noteholders and the Company.

      Our cash resources are currently inadequate to allow us to pay the Notes
at maturity in cash. Further, though we have the right to pay the Notes and
certain similar debt obligations in Common Stock at maturity, at the $.30
closing price of our shares on May 30, 2003 this would have required issuance of
15,857,000 shares, a number which exceeds the 12,633,370 shares now outstanding
and also exceeds the number of shares available for issuance. Accordingly, we
have submitted to our stockholders for approval a proposed amendment to our
Certificate of Incorporation increasing the authorized shares of Common Stock.

      At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders we are also seeking approval of the
creation of a new class of "blank check" Preferred Stock. The existence of a
blank check Preferred Stock would also allow us to offer payment of the debt
through issuance of a security which would have rights more beneficial to the
investors and superior to the Common Stock, which we would otherwise be forced
to use. For example, the Preferred Stock could have significant liquidation
preferences over the Common Stock, and could be convertible at the option of the
holder. Thus investors would be given, for the first time, the opportunity to
have liquidity on their investment. To protect investors in the Notes against
the extraordinary dilution which would occur through issuance of the tremendous
number of shares of Common Stock now required to satisfy the debt, there could
also be limitations on the magnitude of sales of the Common Stock issued in
conversion at any time, depending on market conditions. Of course, these are
just illustrations. Whether the investors will prefer to receive Preferred Stock
instead of Common Stock and the terms of the Preferred Stock are yet to be
discussed. For that reason, some time is necessary to allow these discussions to
occur.

      Accordingly, to allow time for the orderly payment of the Notes and to
avoid the adverse consequences of a default, we would appreciate your agreeing
to the extension by executing and returning the attached copy of this letter.

                                           Very truly yours,


                                           Leonard Osser
                                           Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Accepted and approved this
     day of June 2003

[Note Holder.]


by:
   ----------------------------
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40341

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERALD LEE POWERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(L-96-CR-163-1)

March 5, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Charged with interference with a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

111, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 182

U.S.C. § 922, Gerald Lee Powers pled guilty to both charges, reserving his right to

appeal the denial of a motion to suppress certain critical evidence relative thereto.

Having considered the briefs and oral arguments of the parties and pertinent parts

of the record, and finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: February 10, 2015

TO: Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR–2014-0866

FROM: Melanie King, Office of Ai r Quality Planning and Standards

SUBJECT: February 4, 2015 Call with ADEC and AEA regarding the NSPS for Stationary CI Engines

SUMMARY

A call was held between EPA, the Alaska Depart ment of Environmental Conservation (ADEC), and the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) on Februa ry 4, 2015, to discuss the November 28, 2014 request

from ADEC to revise the New Source Performa nce Standards (NSPS) for stationary compression ignition internal combustion engines. The pa rticipants in the call are listed below.

ATTENDEES

Steve Fruh, EPA Melanie King, EPA Sheila Igoe, EPA Heather Valdez, EPA Alice Edwards, ADEC Tom Turner, ADEC Rebecca Smith, ADEC David Lockard, AEA Sandra Moller, AEA
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

139001 

CHARLES C. ADAMS, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139001 

 COA: 289518 

WCAC: 07-000278 

EATON CORPORATION and OLD 

REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Charles Anton McKAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-6627.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided June 19, 2002.

Charles Anton McKain, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Anton McKain appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for the return of property and the marginal order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See McKain v. United States,*No. CA-02-474B (D. Md. Mar. 22 *&*Apr. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the *672facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of July 22, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2015-B Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2019. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 211

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 10, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make

a technical correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3060.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3060)

3 to implement the Protocol on Environmental Protection

4 to the Antarctic Treaty, the Clerk of the House of Rep5 resentatives shall make the following technical correction:

6 In section 201(a)(1) strike ‘‘paragraphs (1) through (9)

7 of subsection (a) as paragraphs (3) through (11)’’ and in8 sert in lieu thereof ‘‘paragraphs (1) through (10) of sub9 section (a) as paragraphs (3) through (12)’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 10,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
State 2012-2013 Proposed Budget (Tons) 2012-2013 Final

Budget (Tons) Difference

(Tons) Percentage

Difference Iowa 16,532 16,532 0 0% Kansas 13,536 N/A -- -- Michigan 25,752 28,041 2,289 9% Missouri 22,762 22,762 0 0% Oklahoma 21,835 36,567 21,835 14,732 0 67% 0% Wisconsin 13,704 14,784 1,080 8%

State 2014 Proposed

Budget (Tons) 2014 Final Budget (Tons) Difference

(Tons) Percentage

Difference Iowa 16,207 16,207 0 0% Kansas 10,998 N/A -- -- Michigan 24,727 27,016 2,289 9% Missouri 21,073 21,073 0 0% Oklahoma 21,835 21,835 0 0% Wisconsin 13,216 14,296 1, 080 8 %

2012 Total Budget (Tons) Increase Final CSAPR Ozone Season NOx Budget w/o Supplemental States 495,314
- - Final CSAPR and Proposed Supplemental Ozone Season NOx Budget * 595,899 100,585 Final CSAPR and Final Supplemental Ozone Season NOx Budget ** 614,000 118,686 * Does not include proposed budget for Kansas ** Includes 2012 budget for Oklahoma (total would be 599,268 tons in 2013)

2014 Total Budget (Tons) Increase Final CSAPR Ozone Season NOx Budget w/o Supplemental States 466,298
- - Final CSAPR and Proposed Supplemental Ozone Season NOx Budget * 563,356 97,058 Final CSAPR and Final Supplemental Ozone Season NOx Budget 566,725 100,427 * Does not include proposed budget for Kansas
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific Inc on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard Osser, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Leonard Osser
                                        ----------------------
                                        Leonard Osser
                                        Chief Executive Officer

August 17, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark B. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Giant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Giant.


                                       By: /s/ MARK B. COX
                                         -------------------------------
                                       Name:   Mark B. Cox
                                       Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 8, 2006