IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 66

Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government

for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 11, 1995

Mr. NEUMANN (for himself, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. CHRYSLER, Mr. TIAHRT, Mrs.

CUBIN, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. COBURN, Mr. DREIER, Mr. GOSS, Mr. ZELIFF,

Mr. UPTON, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. ROTH, Mr.

HILLEARY, Mr. FRISA, Mrs. SMITH of Washington, Mr. STOCKMAN, Mr.

COOLEY, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. METCALF, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mr.

BROWNBACK, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. CHRISTENSEN,

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr.

COMBEST, and Mr. HORN) submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States

Government for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,

2000, 2001, and 2002.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET

4 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.

5 The Congress determines and declares that this reso6 lution is the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal
2

•HCON 66 IH

1 year 1996, including the appropriate budgetary levels for

2 fiscal years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, as

3 required by section 301 of the Congressional Budget Act

4 of 1974.

5 SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

6 The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the

7 fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995, October 1,

8 1996, October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, October 1, 1999,

9 October 1, 2000, and October 1, 2001:

10 (1) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are

11 as follows:

12 Fiscal year 1996: $1,056,600,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 1997: $1,057,400,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 1998: $1,096,300,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 1999: $1,138,900,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2000: $1,187,200,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2001: $1,240,700,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 2002: $1,300,500,000,000.

19 and the amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal

20 revenues should be increased are as follows:

21 Fiscal year 1996: $13,600,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 1997: ¥$26,600,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 1998: ¥$38,700,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 1999: ¥$48,100,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2000: ¥$57,800,000,000.
3

•HCON 66 IH

1 Fiscal year 2001: ¥$70,300,000,000.

2 Fiscal year 2002: ¥$80,500,000,000.

3 and the amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act

4 revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended

5 levels of Federal revenues are as follows:

6 Fiscal year 1996: $101,900,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 1997: $105,900,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 1998: $110,500,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 1999: $115,600,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2000: $120,700,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 2001: $125,900,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2002: $130,900,000,000.

13 (2) The appropriate levels of total new budget author14 ity are as follows:

15 Fiscal year 1996: $1,219,700,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 1997: $1,236,000,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 1998: $1,251,900,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1999: $1,253,800,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 2000: $1,275,300,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2001: $1,312,600,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2002: $1,359,600,000,000.

22 (3) The appropriate levels of total budget outlays are

23 as follows:

24 Fiscal year 1996: $1,238,700,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 1997: $1,245,700,000,000.
4

•HCON 66 IH

1 Fiscal year 1998: $1,251,200,000,000.

2 Fiscal year 1999: $1,233,400,000,000.

3 Fiscal year 2000: $1,260,700,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2001: $1,302,800,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2002: $1,352,400,000,000.

6 (4) The amounts of the deficits are as follows:

7 Fiscal year 1996: $182,100,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 1997: $188,300,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 1998: $154,900,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 1999: $94,500,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 2000: $73,500,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2001: $62,100,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2002: $51,900,000,000.

14 (5) The appropriate levels of the public debt are as

15 follows:

16 Fiscal year 1996: $5,214,000,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 1997: $5,470,000,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1998: $5,697,000,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 1999: $5,896,000,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2000: $6,081,000,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2001: $6,157,000,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2002: $6,216,000,000,000.

23 (6) The appropriate levels of total Federal credit ac24 tivity for the fiscal years beginning on October 1, 1995,

25 October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997, October 1, 1998, Octo-
5

•HCON 66 IH

1 ber 1, 1999, October 1, 2000, and October 1, 2001 are

2 as follows:

3 Fiscal year 1996:

4 (A) New direct loan obligations,

5 $18,200,000,000.

6 (B) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $170,600,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 1997:

9 (A) New direct loan obligations,

10 $17,200,000,000.

11 (B) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $167,800,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 1998:

14 (A) New direct loan obligations,

15 $16,200,000,000.

16 (B) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $165,000,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1999:

19 (A) New direct loan obligations,

20 $15,200,000,000.

21 (B) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $162,200,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 2000:

24 (A) New direct loan obligations,

25 $14,200,000,000.
6

•HCON 66 IH

1 (B) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $159,400,000,000.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New direct loan obligations,

5 $14,200,000,000.

6 (B) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $159,400,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2002:

9 (A) New direct loan obligations,

10 $14,200,000,000.

11 (B) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $159,400,000.000.

13 SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

14 The Congress determines and declares that the ap15 propriate levels of new budget authority, budget outlays,

16 new direct loan obligations, new primary loan guarantee

17 commitments, and new secondary loan guarantee commit18 ments for fiscal years 1996 through 2002 for each major

19 functional category are:

20 (1) National Defense (050):

21 Fiscal year 1996:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $261,200,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
7

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 1997:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $260,000,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

10 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit11 ments, $0.

12 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com13 mitments, $0.

14 Fiscal year 1998:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $260,000,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com22 mitments, $0.

23 Fiscal year 1999:

24 (A) New budget authority,

25 $260,000,000,000.
8

•HCON 66 IH

1 (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

2 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $0.

5 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com6 mitments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 2000:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $260,000,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $260,000,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $0.

14 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com15 mitments, $0.

16 Fiscal year 2001:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $265,000,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $263,000,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

21 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $0.

23 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com24 mitments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 2002:
9

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $270,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $270,000,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 (2) International Affairs (150):

10 Fiscal year 1996:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $10,900,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $13,400,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations,

15 $4,800,000,000.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $15,200,000,000.

18 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com19 mitments, $0.

20 Fiscal year 1997:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $9,400,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $14,000,000,000.

24 (C) New direct loan obligations,

25 $3,800,000,000.
10

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $12,400,000,000.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 1998:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $8,000,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $2,800,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $9,600,000,000.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1999:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $6,800,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations,

20 $1,800,000,000.

21 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $6,800,000,000.

23 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com24 mitments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 2000:
11

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $8,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations,

5 $800,000,000.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $4,000,000,000.

8 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com9 mitments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 2001:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $8,000,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations,

15 $800,000,000.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $4,000,000,000.

18 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com19 mitments, $0.

20 Fiscal year 2002:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $8,000,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

24 (C) New direct loan obligations,

25 $800,000,000.
12

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $4,000,000,000.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):

6 Fiscal year 1996:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $14,100,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, $15,000,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1997:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $14,100,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $14,400,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com23 mitments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 1998:
13

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $14,500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 1999:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $14,500,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2000:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $14,500,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.
14

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $14,500,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 Fiscal year 2002:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $14,500,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $0.

19 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com20 mitments, $0.

21 (4) Energy (270):

22 Fiscal year 1996:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $3,900,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $3,500,000,000.
15

•HCON 66 IH

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com5 mitments, $0.

6 Fiscal year 1997:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $3,200,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, $2,200,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1998:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $2,600,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $1,900,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com23 mitments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 1999:
16

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $2,300,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $1,300,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 2000:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $1,900,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $1,300,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2001:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $2,000,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $2,000,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.
17

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2002:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $2,500,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $2,500,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):

13 Fiscal year 1996:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $18,600,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $20,700,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $20,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com22 mitments, $0.

23 Fiscal year 1997:

24 (A) New budget authority,

25 $17,600,000,000.
18

•HCON 66 IH

1 (B) Outlays, $19,300,000,000.

2 (C) New direct loan obligations,

3 $20,000,000.

4 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit5 ments, $0.

6 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com7 mitments, $0.

8 Fiscal year 1998:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $17,600,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $17,900,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations,

13 $20,000,000.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 1999:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $17,600,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations,

23 $20,000,000.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $0.
19

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2000:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $17,200,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations,

8 $20,000,000.

9 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit10 ments, $0.

11 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com12 mitments, $0.

13 Fiscal year 2001:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $17,500,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $20,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com22 mitments, $0.

23 Fiscal year 2002:

24 (A) New budget authority,

25 $17,500,000,000.
20

•HCON 66 IH

1 (B) Outlays, $16,500,000,000.

2 (C) New direct loan obligations,

3 $20,000,000.

4 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit5 ments, $0.

6 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com7 mitments, $0.

8 (6) Agriculture (350):

9 Fiscal year 1996:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $12,800,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations,

14 $11,500,000,000.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $2,700,000,000.

17 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com18 mitments, $0.

19 Fiscal year 1997:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 $11,000,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations,

24 $11,500,000,000.
21

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $2,700,000,000.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 1998:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $9,500,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $9,200,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $11,500,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $2,700,000,000.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1999:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $8,200,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations,

20 $11,500,000,000.

21 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $2,700,000,000.

23 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com24 mitments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 2000:
22

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $7,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations,

5 $11,500,000,000.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $2,700,000,000.

8 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com9 mitments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 2001:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $8,500,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $8,000,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations,

15 $11,500,000,000.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $2,700,000,000.

18 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com19 mitments, $0.

20 Fiscal year 2002:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $8,500,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.

24 (C) New direct loan obligations,

25 $11,500,000,000.
23

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $2,700,000,000.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):

6 Fiscal year 1996:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $2,000,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, ¥$7,600,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $97,500,000,000.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $110,000,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 1997:

16 (A) New budget authority, $900,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, ¥$6,000,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $97,500,000,000.

21 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com22 mitments, $80,000,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 1998:

24 (A) New budget authority,

25 ¥$1,400,000,000.
24

•HCON 66 IH

1 (B) Outlays, ¥$9,000,000,000.

2 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $97,500,000,000.

5 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com6 mitments, $50,000,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 1999:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $¥2,100,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, ¥$9,400,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $97,500,000,000.

14 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com15 mitments, $25,000,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2000:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 ¥$3,700,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, ¥$9,700,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

21 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $97,500,000,000.

23 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com24 mitments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 2001:
25

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 ¥$3,700,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$9,700,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $97,500,000,000.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 2002:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 ¥$3,700,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, ¥$9,700,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $97,500,000,000.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 (8) Transportation (400):

19 Fiscal year 1996:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 $29,600,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, $36,100,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations,

24 $200,000,000.
26

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 1997:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $32,000,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $33,500,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $200,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1998:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $31,500,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $32,500,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations,

20 $200,000,000.

21 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $0.

23 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com24 mitments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 1999:
27

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $31,500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $27,800,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations,

5 $200,000,000.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $0.

8 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com9 mitments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 2000:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $30,000,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $29,000,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations,

15 $200,000,000.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $0.

18 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com19 mitments, $0.

20 Fiscal year 2001:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $31,000,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $31,000,000,000.

24 (C) New direct loan obligations,

25 $200,000,000.
28

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 2002:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $32,000,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $32,000,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $200,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 (9) Community and Regional Development (450):

16 Fiscal year 1996:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $6,600,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $10,200,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

21 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $0.

23 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com24 mitments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 1997:
29

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $6,600,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $8,100,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 1998:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $6,400,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $6,900,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 1999:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $6,400,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $6,000,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.
30

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2000:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $6,200,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $6,000,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 Fiscal year 2001:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $7,000,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $0.

19 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com20 mitments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 2002:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $7,500,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $7,500,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
31

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social

6 Services (500):

7 Fiscal year 1996:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $43,300,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $51,000,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $27,400,000,000.

14 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com15 mitments, $0.

16 Fiscal year 1997:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $40,600,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $42,300,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

21 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $27,400,000,000.

23 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com24 mitments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 1998:
32

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $40,800,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $40,400,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $27,400,000,000.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 1999:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $41,500,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $39,500,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $27,400,000,000.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2000:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $41,500,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $40,500,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $27,400,000,000.
33

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $42,100,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $42,000,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $27,400,000,000.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 Fiscal year 2002:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $44,000,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $44,000,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $27,400,000,000.

19 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com20 mitments, $0.

21 (11) Health (550):

22 Fiscal year 1996:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $118,000,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $116,000,000,000.
34

•HCON 66 IH

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $400,000,000.

4 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com5 mitments, $0.

6 Fiscal year 1997:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $120,000,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, $119,000,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $400,000,000.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1998:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $123,000,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $122,000,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $400,000,000.

22 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com23 mitments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 1999:
35

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $127,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $124,000,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $400,000,000.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 2000:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $131,000,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $130,000,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $400,000,000.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2001:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $133,000,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $133,000,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $400,000,000.
36

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2002:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $136,000,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $136,000,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $400,000,000.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 (12) Medicare (570):

13 Fiscal year 1996:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $171,700,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $170,100,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

18 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit19 ments, $0.

20 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com21 mitments, $0.

22 Fiscal year 1997:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $181,400,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $179,600,000,000.
37

•HCON 66 IH

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com5 mitments, $0.

6 Fiscal year 1998:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $191,500,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, $189,700,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1999:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $202,200,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $200,000,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com23 mitments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 2000:
38

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $213,600,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $210,000,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 2001:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $223,000,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $223,000,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2002:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $236,000,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $236,000,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.
39

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 (13) Income Security (600):

4 Fiscal year 1996:

5 (A) New budget authority, $205,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $214,000,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $20,000,000.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 Fiscal year 1997:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $208,000,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $216,000,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $20,000,000.

19 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com20 mitments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 1998:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $214,000,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $218,000,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
40

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $20,000,000.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 1999:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $220,000,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $220,000,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

10 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit11 ments, $20,000,000.

12 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com13 mitments, $0.

14 Fiscal year 2000:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $229,000,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $229,000,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $20,000,000.

21 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com22 mitments, $0.

23 Fiscal year 2001:

24 (A) New budget authority,

25 $233,000,000,000.
41

•HCON 66 IH

1 (B) Outlays, $233,000,000,000.

2 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $20,000,000.

5 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com6 mitments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 2002:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $237,000,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $237,000,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $20,000,000.

14 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com15 mitments, $0.

16 (14) Social Security (650):

17 Fiscal year 1996:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $5,400,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $5,400,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $0.

24 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com25 mitments, $0.
42

•HCON 66 IH

1 Fiscal year 1997:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $6,200,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $6,200,000,000.

5 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $0.

8 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com9 mitments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 1998:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $5,600,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $5,600,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com18 mitments, $0.

19 Fiscal year 1999:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 $5,300,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, $5,300,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $0.
43

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2000:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $4,900,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $4,900,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 Fiscal year 2001:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $4,700,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $4,700,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $0.

19 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com20 mitments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 2002:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $4,900,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $4,900,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
44

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):

6 Fiscal year 1996:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $36,300,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, $35,800,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations,

11 $1,700,000,000.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $27,400,000,000.

14 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com15 mitments, $0.

16 Fiscal year 1997:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $37,200,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $37,000,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations,

21 $1,700,000,000.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $27,400,000,000.

24 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com25 mitments, $0.
45

•HCON 66 IH

1 Fiscal year 1998:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $37,500,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $37,400,000,000.

5 (C) New direct loan obligations,

6 $1,700,000,000.

7 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit8 ments, $27,400,000,000.

9 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com10 mitments, $0.

11 Fiscal year 1999:

12 (A) New budget authority,

13 $38,000,000,000.

14 (B) Outlays, $38,000,000,000.

15 (C) New direct loan obligations,

16 $1,700,000,000.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $27,400,000,000.

19 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com20 mitments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 2000:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $40,000,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $40,000,000,000.
46

•HCON 66 IH

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $1,700,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $27,400,000,000.

5 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com6 mitments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 2001:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $41,000,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $41,000,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations,

12 $1,700,000,000.

13 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit14 ments, $27,400,000,000.

15 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com16 mitments, $0.

17 Fiscal year 2002:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $43,000,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $43,000,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations,

22 $1,700,000,000.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $27,400,000,000.
47

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 (16) Administration of Justice (750):

4 Fiscal year 1996:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $16,200,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $16,100,000,000.

8 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

9 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit10 ments, $0.

11 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com12 mitments, $0.

13 Fiscal year 1997:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $16,100,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

18 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit19 ments, $0.

20 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com21 mitments, $0.

22 Fiscal year 1998:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $16,000,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.
48

•HCON 66 IH

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com5 mitments, $0.

6 Fiscal year 1999:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $16,000,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, $15,700,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 2000:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $16,000,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $15,600,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com23 mitments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 2001:
49

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $16,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 2002:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $16,000,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 (17) General Government (800):

19 Fiscal year 1996:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 $12,800,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $0.
50

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 1997:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $12,600,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 Fiscal year 1998:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $12,400,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $0.

19 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com20 mitments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 1999:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $12,400,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
51

•HCON 66 IH

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com4 mitments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 2000:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $12,400,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

10 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit11 ments, $0.

12 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com13 mitments, $0.

14 Fiscal year 2001:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $12,400,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com22 mitments, $0.

23 Fiscal year 2002:

24 (A) New budget authority,

25 $12,400,000,000.
52

•HCON 66 IH

1 (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.

2 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $0.

5 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com6 mitments, $0.

7 (18) Net Interest (900):

8 Fiscal year 1996:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $297,100,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $297,100,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

13 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit14 ments, $0.

15 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com16 mitments, $0.

17 Fiscal year 1997:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $305,600,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $305,600,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $0.

24 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com25 mitments, $0.
53

•HCON 66 IH

1 Fiscal year 1998:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $309,800,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $309,800,000,000.

5 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $0.

8 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com9 mitments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 1999:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $315,800,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $315,800,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com18 mitments, $0.

19 Fiscal year 2000:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 $321,200,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, $321,200,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $0.
54

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $326,000,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $326,000,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 Fiscal year 2002:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $332,000,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $332,000,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $0.

19 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com20 mitments, $0.

21 (19) Allowances (920):

22 Fiscal year 1996:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 ¥$14,500,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, ¥$12,300,000,000.
55

•HCON 66 IH

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com5 mitments, $0.

6 Fiscal year 1997:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 ¥$15,100,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, ¥$13,100,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1998:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 ¥$15,400,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, ¥$13,400,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com23 mitments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 1999:
56

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 ¥$33,900,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$32,900,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 2000:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 ¥$38,500,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, ¥$38,500,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2001:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 ¥$32,800,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays,

22 (C) New direct loan obligations,

23 ¥$32,800,000,000.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $0.
57

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2002:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 ¥$20,800,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, ¥$20,800,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com11 mitments, $0.

12 (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):

13 Fiscal year 1996:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 ¥$31,300,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, ¥$31,300,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

18 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit19 ments, $0.

20 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com21 mitments, $0.

22 Fiscal year 1997:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 ¥$31,200,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, ¥$31,200,000,000.
58

•HCON 66 IH

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com5 mitments, $0.

6 Fiscal year 1998:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 ¥$31,900,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, ¥$31,900,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com14 mitments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1999:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 ¥$35,800,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, ¥$35,800,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com23 mitments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 2000:
59

•HCON 66 IH

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 ¥$36,800,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$36,800,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com8 mitments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 2001:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 ¥$35,600,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, ¥$35,600,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com17 mitments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2002:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 ¥$37,700,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, ¥$37,700,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.
60

•HCON 66 IH

1 (E) New secondary loan guarantee com2 mitments, $0.

3 SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

4 (a) Not later than July 14, 1995, the House commit5 tees named in subsections (b) through (o) of this section

6 shall submit their recommendations to the House Budget

7 Committee. After receiving those recommendations, the

8 House Budget Committee shall report to the House a rec9 onciliation bill or resolution or both carrying out all such

10 recommendations without any substantive revision.

11 (b) The House Committee on Agriculture shall report

12 changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct

13 spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays

14 as follows: $6,200,000,000 in budget authority and

15 $6,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

16 $11,500,000,000 in budget authority and

17 $11,500,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

18 $14,400,000,000 in budget authority and

19 $14,400,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

20 $17,100,000,000 in budget authority and

21 $17,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

22 $19,400,000,000 in budget authority and

23 $19,400,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

24 $21,100,000,000 in budget authority and

25 $21,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and
61

•HCON 66 IH

1 $23,600,000,000 in budget authority and

2 $23,600,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

3 (c) The House Committee on Banking and Financial

4 Services shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction

5 that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget

6 authority and outlays as follows: $800,000,000 in budget

7 authority and $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

8 $800,000,000 in budget authority and $800,000,000 in

9 outlays in fiscal year 1997, $800,000,000 in budget au10 thority and $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

11 $800,000,000 in budget authority and $800,000,000 in

12 outlays in fiscal year 1999, $800,000,000 in budget au13 thority and $800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

14 $800,000,000 in budget authority and $800,000,000 in

15 outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $800,000,000 in budget

16 authority and $800,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

17 (d) The House Committee on Commerce shall report

18 changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct

19 spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays

20 as follows: $19,900,000,000 in budget authority and

21 $19,300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

22 $36,800,000,000 in budget authority and

23 $37,200,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

24 $55,900,000,000 in budget authority and

25 $56,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,
62

•HCON 66 IH

1 $80,300,000,000 in budget authority and

2 $79,700,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

3 $100,600,000,000 in budget authority and

4 $100,800,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

5 $124,900,000,000 in budget authority and

6 $124,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and

7 $148,400,000,000 in budget authority and

8 $148,400,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

9 (e) The House Committee on Economic and Edu10 cational Opportunities shall report changes in laws within

11 its jurisdiction that provide direct spending sufficient to

12 reduce budget authority and outlays as follows:

13 $1,600,000,000 in budget authority and $1,600,000,000

14 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $2,500,000,000 in budget

15 authority and $2,500,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

16 1997, $2,600,000,000 in budget authority and

17 $2,600,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

18 $2,800,000,000 in budget authority and $2,800,000,000

19 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $2,900,000,000 in budget

20 authority and $2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

21 2000, $3,100,000,000 in budget authority and

22 $3,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and

23 $3,300,000,000 in budget authority and $3,300,000,000

24 in fiscal year 2002.
63

•HCON 66 IH

1 (f) The House Committee on Government Reform

2 and Oversight shall report changes in laws within its juris3 diction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce

4 budget authority and outlays as follows: $1,800,000,000

5 in budget authority and $1,800,000,000 in outlays in fis6 cal year 1996, $2,600,000,000 in budget authority and

7 $2,600,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1997,

8 $2,900,000,000 in budget authority and $2,900,000,000

9 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, $2,900,000,000 in budget

10 authority and $2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

11 1999, $2,900,000,000 in budget authority and

12 $2,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2000,

13 $2,900,000,000 in budget authority and $2,900,000,000

14 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $2,900,000,000 in

15 budget authority and $2,900,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

16 (g) The House Committee on International Relations

17 shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that

18 provide direct spending sufficient to reduce budget author19 ity and outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0

20 in outlays in fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and

21 $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $0 in budget authority

22 and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget author23 ity and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget

24 authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $0 in
64

•HCON 66 IH

1 budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001,

2 and $0 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

3 (h) The House Committee on the Judiciary shall re4 port changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

5 direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and

6 outlays as follows: $1,000,000,000 in budget authority

7 and $750,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

8 $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and $800,000,000 in

9 outlays in fiscal year 1997, $1,000,000,000 in budget au10 thority and $900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1998,

11 $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and $1,000,000,000

12 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $1,000,000,000 in budget

13 authority and $1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

14 2000, $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and

15 $1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and

16 $1,000,000,000 in budget authority and $1,000,000,000

17 in fiscal year 2002.

18 (i) The House Committee on National Security shall

19 report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

20 direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and

21 outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in out22 lays in fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0

23 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $0 in budget authority and

24 $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget authority

25 and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget author-
65

•HCON 66 IH

1 ity and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $0 in budget

2 authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $0

3 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

4 (j) The House Committee on Resources shall report

5 changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct

6 spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays

7 as follows: $4,200,000,000 in budget authority and

8 $4,100,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

9 $5,800,000,000 in budget authority and $5,800,000,000

10 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $5,000,000,000 in budget

11 authority and $5,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

12 1998, $3,900,000,000 in budget authority and

13 $3,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

14 $4,000,000,000 in budget authority and $4,000,000,000

15 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $3,400,000,000 in budget

16 authority and $3,400,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

17 2001, and $3,400,000,000 in budget authority and

18 $3,400,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

19 (k) The House Committee on Science shall report

20 changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct

21 spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays

22 as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in

23 fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0 in outlays

24 in fiscal year 1997, $0 in budget authority and $0 in out25 lays in fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget authority and $0
66

•HCON 66 IH

1 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget authority and

2 $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $0 in budget authority

3 and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $0 in budget

4 authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

5 (l) The House Committee on Small Business shall re6 port changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

7 direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and

8 outlays as follows: $0 in budget authority and $0 in out9 lays in fiscal year 1996, $0 in budget authority and $0

10 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $0 in budget authority and

11 $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, $0 in budget authority

12 and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1999, $0 in budget author13 ity and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $0 in budget

14 authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $0

15 in budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

16 (m) The House Committee on Transportation and In17 frastructure shall report changes in laws within its juris18 diction that provide direct spending sufficient to reduce

19 budget authority and outlays as follows: $5,000,000,000

20 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

21 $8,200,000,000 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in

22 fiscal year 1997, $8,500,000,000 in budget authority and

23 $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1998, $8,800,000,000 in budg24 et authority and $0 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

25 $9,100,000,000 in budget authority and $0 in outlays in
67

•HCON 66 IH

1 fiscal year 2000, $9,400,000,000 in budget authority and

2 $0 in outlays in fiscal year 2001, and $9,800,000,000 in

3 budget authority and $0 in fiscal year 2002.

4 (n) The House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs shall

5 report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

6 direct spending sufficient to reduce budget authority and

7 outlays as follows: $1,100,000,000 in budget authority

8 and $1,000,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1996,

9 $1,200,000,000 in budget authority and $1,200,000,000

10 in outlays in fiscal year 1997, $1,300,000,000 in budget

11 authority and $1,300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

12 1998, $1,900,000,000 in budget authority and

13 $1,900,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year 1999,

14 $2,100,000,000 in budget authority and $2,200,000,000

15 in outlays in fiscal year 2000, $2,100,000,000 in budget

16 authority and $2,300,000,000 in outlays in fiscal year

17 2001, and $2,400,000,000 in budget authority and

18 $2,600,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

19 (o) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall

20 report changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to

21 reduce the deficit, as follows: $45,300,000,000 in fiscal

22 year 1996, $32,000,000,000 in fiscal year 1997,

23 $39,300,000,000 in fiscal year 1998, $52,000,000,000 in

24 fiscal year 1999, $66,700,000,000 in fiscal year 2000,
68

•HCON 66 IH

1 $82,100,000,000 in fiscal year 2001, and

2 $97,400,000,000 in fiscal year 2002.

3 (p) For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘direct

4 spending’’ has the meaning given to such term in section

5 250(c)(8) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

6 Control Act of 1985 and the term ‘‘new budget authority’’

7 has the meaning given to such term in section 3(2) of the

8 Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of

9 1974.

10 SEC. 5. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING SOCIAL

11 SECURITY.

12 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that

13 legislation should be enacted that:

14 (1) Prohibits the use of the surplus funds col15 lected as part of the social security payroll tax from

16 being used to balance the budget or reduce the defi17 cit.

18 (2) Starting in 1996, sets aside these surplus

19 funds to preserve and protect the social security sys20 tem.

21 (3) Establishes a bipartisan commission to

22 oversee the protection of these surplus funds, the

23 primary purpose of which is to establish a safe and

24 secure mechanism to preserve these funds.
69

•HCON 66 IH

1 (4) Provides that as the Federal debt is repaid,

2 the social security funds that are currently part of

3 the $4,900,000,000,000 Federal debt as well as in4 terest on these funds shall also be repaid and set

5 aside under the mechanism established under para6 graphs (2) and (3).

7 SEC. 6. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING DEBT REPAY8 MENT.

9 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that:

10 (1) The Congress has a basic moral and ethical

11 responsibility to future generations to repay the

12 Federal debt. The Congress should enact a plan that

13 not only balances the budget but also institutes a

14 regimen for paying off the Federal debt.

15 (2) After the budget is balanced, spending

16 should be allowed to grow at a rate slower than ex17 pected revenues so that a surplus is created which

18 can be used to begin paying off the debt.

19 (3) Such a plan should be enacted into law so

20 that this generation can save our children and

21 grandchildren from the crushing burdens of the Fed22 eral debt.

Æ

HCON 66 IH——2

HCON 66 IH——3
70

•HCON 66 IH

HCON 66 IH——4

HCON 66 IH——5

HCON 66 IH——6

HCON 66 IH——7