DAVIDS. MA C I <EY dma c ke y@a nd e r so nkr e i ger.com T: 617-621

-653 1 F : 617-621-663

1 August 5, 20 1 6 ANDERSON KREIGER BY EMAIL AN D US MAIL (9-A WA-AGC-Part-16
@f aa.gov) FAA Part 16 A i rport Proce
e ding s Docket AGC -600 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Ind ependence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 2 0591 Re: Mark Smith, eta/. v. City of Sa uta il'lonica, Ca lifornia, Docket No. 16-16-02 Dear Sir or Madam: I have enclose
d for filing a s i gne d origina

l a nd thr ee cop ie s of RE S P ONDENT's
A SSE NT ED-To MOTION TO EXTEN D T I ME. On e of the copies of thi s document

i s unbound,
as s p ec i fied in th e No ti ceof D ocke tin ga nd 1 4C.F.R

.§ 16.1 3. 1 e l y, **Da id** **~** E nclo
s ur es cc: Richard K. Simon (by e m a il a nd US m a il) A ND ERSO N &

! <RE IGER LLP

I O N E CANA
L PARK

,S UIT E 2 00
,CA M B R

I DGE, MA 0 2 141

I 617.621.6500BEFORE THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. MARK SMITH ET AL. Complainants,

' v.

; Docket No. 16-16-02 CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S ASSENTED-TO MOTION TO EXTEND TIME The Respondent, the City of Santa Monica (the "City"), moves to extend the time to file a Rebuttal by approximately four weeks, from August 11, 2016 to Tuesday, September 13, 2016. In support of its motion, the City states as follows: I. On April II, 2016, the City filed a Motion to Dismiss Part N of the Complaint. On April22, the Complainants filed an Answer to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. The FAA has not yet issued
a decision on the Motion to Dismiss. 2. Per the FAA's June
I 0, 2016 Order, the City filed its Answer to the Complaint on July I, 2016. 3. The Complainants filed their Reply to the Answer on August I, 2016. Under 14 C.P.R.§ 16.23(£), the Respondent's Rebuttal
is cunently due on Thursday, August II. 4. The City needs the additional time it now seeks to prepare its Rebuttal, and the Complainants will not be prejudiced by the proposed extension of time. 5. Complainants' counsel has consented
to this proposed extension of time.For these reasons

,the City respectfu

ll ymovesthat the time tofileits Rebuttal be extended to September
13 ,2016. Asse nted to by
: MARK SMITH ETAL. Q\vWvJ **~· St~;** lsrrv-J Richard K. Simon 1700 Deck erSchool Lane Malibu, CA 90265 310-503-7286 rsimon3 @veri zon.net August

5 ,2 016

Byits attorneys, **/** ScottP. Lewis David S. Mackey JessicaA. Wall ANDERSON

& KREIG ERLLP 1 Canal Park, Suite 200 Cambridge, MA 02141 61 7.62 1. 6560 slew

i s@andersonk.reiger

.com MarshaMoutrie City Attorney CITY OF S ANTA MO NICA 1685 Main Stree

t ,Room 310 Santa Monica, CA 9040
1 Marsha .moutr
i e@smgov .net 2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby ce1tify in accordance with 14 CFR § 16

.15(a) that
I have on this day
s erved the foregoing Respondent's Assented-to Motion to Extend Time on the following per s ons at the following addre ss e s by email and first-cla ss mail: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk AGC-600 Fed e ral Aviation Administration 800 Independence

A venue, SW Wa s hington, D.C

.20591 9-A **WA-AGC-P~t-16@faa.gov** Dated this 5th day of August

,2016. **!v L**  David S. Mackey "'( for the Respond

e nt

3 Richard K. Simon 1700 Decker School Lane Malibu

,CA 90265 310-503-7286 rsimon3 @ verizon.net