alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
39348.

#### DAVIS v. HARRELL CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC.

Decided April 4, 1962

Rehearing denied April 24, 1962.

*786*George A. Horkan, Jr., William C. Peters,*for plaintiff in error.

*Whelchel ■& Whelchel, Hoyt H. Whelchel, Jr., James C. Whelchel,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The petition, while nowhere alleging expressly that the stacking of the cement in irregular and unbalanced stacks, together with the vibration caused by the heavy machinery located immediately adjacent to the cement house, caused the bag of cement to fall from the top of a nearby stack, does allege the acts of negligence relied upon in paragraph 6 of the petition, and paragraph 7 alleges that, because of such want of ordinary care the plaintiff received the injuries complained of.

While on demurrer pleadings must be construed most strongly against the pleader, yet they must be accepted as true and, as *787against general demurrer, a general allegation of negligence is sufficient. See *Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.,*122 Ga. 695 (1) (50 SE 974); *Whitsett v. Hester-Bowman Enterprises, Inc.,*94 Ga. App. 78, 83 (93 SE2d 788). The petition was sufficient to show a duty, a breach thereof, and an injury. *Ellison v. Georgia R. Co.,*87 Ga. 691 (13 SE 809).

The defendant contends, however, that the petition shows that the plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care for his own safety and that an action is therefore barred by *Code*§ 106-603. Such contention is without merit, for, under the allegations of the petition, the danger, or defect in the premises, was not one that was so conspicuous as to be obvious to all who entered the building save those who were failing to exercise ordinary care for their own safety, for, while the plaintiff would have seen the bags of cement in the exercise of ordinary care for his own safety, the petition does not make it appear that in the exercise of ordinary care for his own safety he should have realized the danger connected therewith, to wit: that the vibrations caused by the heavy machinery located immediately adjacent thereto would cause the top bag of cement to fall. See, as to plaintiff’s duty to exercise ordinary care for his own safety, *Wynne v. Southern Bell Tel. &c. Co.,*159 Ga. 623 (2) (126 SE 388); *Glover v. City Council of Augusta,*83 Ga. App. 314 (63 SE2d 422), and citations. The petition was not subject to the defendant’s general demurrer, and the judgment of the trial court sustaining such demurrer must be reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
#### § 1.812-1 Taxable years affected.

Sections 1.812-2 through 1.812-8, except as otherwise provided therein, are applicable only to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1957, and all references to sections of part I, subchapter L, chapter 1 of the Code are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended by the Life Insurance Company Income Tax Act of 1959 (73 Stat. 112) and the Act of October 23, 1962 (76 Stat. 1134).

[T.D. 6886, 31 FR 8689, June 23, 1966]
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 203

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in consonance with section 132(a) of

3 the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, when the

4 House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, August

5 1, 1996, Friday, August 2, 1996, or Saturday, August 3,
2

HCON 203 RDS

1 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader

2 or his designee, it stand adjourned until noon on Wednes3 day, September 4, 1996, or until noon on the second day

4 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec5 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first;

6 and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

7 of business on Thursday, August 1, 1996, Friday, August

8 2, 1996, Saturday, August 3, 1996, or Sunday, August

9 4, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Lead10 er or his designee in accordance with this resolution, it

11 stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, Sep12 tember 3, 1996, or until such time on that day as may

13 be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the

14 motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second

15 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

16 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

17 first.

18 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

19 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

20 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead21 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House
3

HCON 203 RDS

1 and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their

2 opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
[4910-13-P] DEPARTMENT OF iRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration :(}~ClJR"n,cp~< "OllTlNG SYMBl;lL 

## tllo-KI< 14CFR Part39 INITIAlS'SiC .) 

## a-J.,
DATE

RIN 2120-AA64 

### i-IS--ic [Docket No. FAA-2009-0614; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-045-AD; Amendme lITlNGSY"A(ll, 39

# ~f(2*~b,AD***~eLOI

-/0-D7 lilo-i<EJ IN.""!.S.' LQ 1(. ~ 

# "ie/V!liD Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mo '&jmNGSVMOOL , I 

# l~,~e,P£JjERJ 170 and Model ERJ 190 Airplanes 

# W.

DATE AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). RO~'TING S"MIIOI. 

### AN/", 

# -1-

NlTlALS'<lG

ROUT,,,G ''-MeOL !<OUT,NG S'·MBOL



## * * ACTION: Final rule. 

## C~ l>ATo SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness dir.ctive (AD) forthe products lis 3Jlff.

# 1(0

I 

# I I 

## RO~::c;.'~~OOL above. This AD results from mandatory continuing 31'l0rthiness information (MeAl) ~'Al.5'5i" 

## /Ii

.. db I h· [h ·d .[' d ~ 

### 10 ongmate yan a~la~lonaut onty 0 anot ercoun~l to I entl yan c~~ect an uosa), A 

# h~ condltton on an aViationproduct. The MeAl descnbes lle unsafe conditIon as: .0 /1/JM- 

### '0 

## I INIT',LS;?'

# n Ithas been found the occurrence ofoutboard sia skew sensor failure in C U-- open or closed position. The combination of

# ah ~utboard slat skew sensor 

# 1-(w;; t:l failed closed, an outboard slat actuator stmctJral failure (mpture) and its adjacent actuatbr torque limiter failing high (indws higher loads tothe panel struc1ure~occurring inthe same slat surfade, under nOlmal f1lght loads, may lead [the] slat surface to detach frdmlthe wmg with the posslbdlty ofhitting and damagmg the honzohdl stabJilzer and elevator, which may affect the atrplane controllability 

# I

~ * * * * rNrTIAL'I;]G

DAT~ We are issuing this AID to require actions to correct the nsafe condition on these



# , I
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1257

JAMES R. REGISTER; JACK B. WATSON,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

SEAFARERS PENSION PLAN; LOU DELMA, Plan

Administrator of Seafarers Pension Plan; JOHN

FAY, Trustee of Seafarers Pension Plan; BYRON

KELLEY; GEORGE MCCARTNEY, Trustee of Seafarers

Pension Plan; HOSEA PEREZ, Trustee of Seafarers Pension Plan; AUGUSTINE TELLEZ, Trustee

of Seafarers Pension Plan; JOSEPH CECIRE,

Trustee of Seafarers Pension Plan; EDMOND

DAVIS, Trustee of Seafarers Pension Plan;

MICHAEL DIPRISCO, Trustee of Seafarers Pension

Plan; WILLIAM PAGENDARM, Trustee of Seafarers

Pension Plan; MICHAEL SWAYNE, Trustee of Seafarers Pension Plan; SEAFARERS WELFARE PLAN;

PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF SEAFARERS WELFARE PLAN,

Defendants - Appellants,

and

SEAFARERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH

AMERICA, ATLANTIC, GULF, LAKES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-00-143-7-F(1))
2

Submitted: July 17, 2001 Decided: July 30, 2001

Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ellen A. Silver, Camp Springs, Maryland; Lisa Grafstein, GRAFSTEIN

& WALCZYK, P.L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellants. Mark

S. Thomas, Terence D. Freidman, Joanne Lambert, MAUPIN, TAYLOR &

ELLIS, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motion for a preliminary injunction and subsequent orders

implementing the injunction. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. See Register v. Seafarers

Pension Plan, No. CA-00-143-7-F(1) (E.D.N.C. Jan 12 & 22, 2001;

Feb. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
TS-FC12NT

Attachment No. 004

PMN Page 10 Section II.B.1 (NCS Offsite Use Description and Diagram)

 

 



 





 

 ** COMPANY SANITIZED **
TS-FC12NT

Attachment No. 004

PMN Page 10 Section II.B.1 (NCS Offsite Use Description and Diagram)

 

 ** COMPANY SANITIZED **
TS-FC12NT

Attachment No. 004

PMN Page 10 Section II.B.1 (NCS Offsite Use Description and Diagram)

[



























( g )

 ** COMPANY SANITIZED **
TS-FC12NT

Attachment No. 004

PMN Page 10 Section II.B.1 (NCS Offsite Use Description and Diagram)





 ** COMPANY SANITIZED **
Exhibit 11

POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE
EARNINGS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30



|                                                                                 |  |      |             |  |      |  |             | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----------- |  | ---- |  | ----------- | 
|                                                                                 |  | 2012 |             |  | 2011 | 
|A      Net income as reported ($ millions)                                       |  |      | 1,658       |  |      |  | 2,398       | 
|B      Weighted average number of shares outstanding                             |  |      | 859,118,000 |  |      |  | 855,024,000 | 
|C      Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation |  |      | 16,767,000  |  |      |  | 21,820,000  | 
|                                                                                 |  |     
|IFRS                                                                             |  |      |             |  |      |  |             | 
|Basic earnings per share (A/B)                                                   |  |      | 1.93        |  |      |  | 2.80        | 
|Diluted earnings per share (A/(B+C))                                             |  |      | 1.89        |  |      |  | 2.73        |
§ 1.951A-6 Adjustments related to tested losses. ( a ) *Scope.* This section provides rules relating to adjustments related to tested losses. Paragraph (b) of this section provides rules that increase the earnings and profits of a tested loss CFC for purposes of section 952(c)(1)(A). Paragraph (c) of this section is reserved for a rule for tested loss adjustments.
( b ) *Increase of earnings and profits of tested loss CFC for purposes of section 952(c)(1)(A).* For purposes of section 952(c)(1)(A) with respect to a CFC inclusion year, the earnings and profits of a tested loss CFC are increased by an amount equal to the tested loss of the tested loss CFC for the CFC inclusion year.
( c ) [Reserved]
[T.D. 9866, 84 FR 29341, June 21, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 41 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on Thursday, March 16, 1995, it stand 
adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 21, 1995.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Providing for an adjournment of the House from Thursday, March 16, 
                   1995, to Tuesday, March 21, 1995.
```
EXHIBIT 35.1



World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB



I, Joseph A. Venezia,
do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify
on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of October 14, 2015 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2015-B, as Issuing Entity,
World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:



(i)        A
review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
made under my supervision.



(ii)       To
the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 8, 2019.



| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.
| | --------------------------



| | By: | /s/Joseph A. Venezia          
| | --- | ------------------------------
| |     | Name: Joseph A. Venezia       
| |     | Title: Chief Financial Officer
§ 1.897-8T Status as a U.S. real property holding corporation as a condition for electing section 897(i) pursuant to § 1.897-3 (temporary). ( a ) *Purpose and scope.* This section provides a temporary regulation that if and when adopted as a final regulation, will be added to paragraph (b) of § 1.897-3. Paragraph (b) of this section would then appear as paragraph (b)(4) of § 1.897-3.
( b ) *General conditions.* The foreign corporation upon making an election under section 897(i) (including any retroactive election) must qualify as a U.S. real property holding corporation as defined in paragraph (b)(1) of § 1.897-2.
( c ) *Effective Date.* Section 1.897-8T shall be effective as of June 6, 1988, with respect to foreign corporations making an election under section 897(i) after May 5, 1988.
[T.D. 8198, 53 FR 16229, May 5, 1988]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Comparison of Three Random Number Generators for Aircraft Dynamic Modeling ApplicationsThree random number generators, which produce Gaussian white noise sequences, were compared to assess their suitability in aircraft dynamic modeling applications. The first generator considered was the MATLAB (registered) implementation of the Mersenne-Twister algorithm. The second generator was a website called Random.org, which processes atmospheric noise measured using radios to create the random numbers. The third generator was based on synthesis of the Fourier series, where the random number sequences are constructed from prescribed amplitude and phase spectra. A total of 200 sequences, each having 601 random numbers, for each generator were collected and analyzed in terms of the mean, variance, normality, autocorrelation, and power spectral density. These sequences were then applied to two problems in aircraft dynamic modeling, namely estimating stability and control derivatives from simulated onboard sensor data, and simulating flight in atmospheric turbulence. In general, each random number generator had good performance and is well-suited for aircraft dynamic modeling applications. Specific strengths and weaknesses of each generator are discussed. For Monte Carlo simulation, the Fourier synthesis method is recommended because it most accurately and consistently approximated Gaussian white noise and can be implemented with reasonable computational effort.Document ID20170005202Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGrauer, Jared A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 6, 2017Publication DateMay 1, 2017Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlStatistics And ProbabilityReport/Patent NumberL-20807NASA/TM-2017-219612NF1676L-26863Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.07.02.10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005202.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Den Europæiske Unions C 301A/12.

| | ISSN 1725-2393 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 301A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 49. årgang12. december 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2393

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 301A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

49. årgang12. december 2006

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oplysninger |
| | Kommissionen |
| 2006/C 301A/1 | EF-Sortsmyndigheden — Indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser med henblik på udnævnelse til formand for appelkammeret ved EF-Sortsmyndigheden og til suppleant herfor | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

III   Oplysninger

Kommissionen

2006/C 301A/1

EF-Sortsmyndigheden — Indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser med henblik på udnævnelse til formand for appelkammeret ved EF-Sortsmyndigheden og til suppleant herfor

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

III Oplysninger

Kommissionen

| 12.12.2006 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 301/1

---

EF-SORTSMYNDIGHEDEN

Indkaldelse af interessetilkendegivelser med henblik på udnævnelse til formand for appelkammeret ved EF-Sortsmyndigheden og til suppleant herfor

(2006/C 301 A/01)

EF-Sortsmyndigheden søger en formand for appelkammeret samt en suppleant herfor.

Ansøgerne skal være statsborgere i en af Den Europæiske Unions medlemsstater.

Formanden og dennes suppleant udnævnes af Rådet på grundlag af en liste over ansøgere, som Kommissionen opstiller efter at have indhentet udtalelse fra Sortsmyndighedens administrationsråd. Oplysninger om vederlag kan fås ved henvendelse til appelkammerets sekretariat (EF-Sortsmyndigheden, 3 boulevard Maréchal Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). EF-Sortsmyndigheden og Kommissionen fører en aktiv ligestillingspolitik.

Stillingsbeskrivelse, ansøgningsformular og en ansøgningsvejledning kan hentes på følgende websted:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

eller

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Ansøgninger skal være modtaget senest den 31. januar 2007 (se nærmere enkeltheder i ansøgningsvejledningen).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from R. P.
Scherer Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form
10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          52,097
<SECURITIES>                                     3,455
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,000
<INVENTORY>                                     70,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               252,979
<PP&E>                                         449,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                 139,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 754,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,332
<BONDS>                                        185,886
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           235
<OTHER-SE>                                     339,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   754,155
<SALES>                                        438,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               438,625
<CGS>                                          294,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  363,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,142
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.63
        

</TABLE>