alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J~~cEO srqr~ 

s. 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

~rtM/o 

PROjEGC 

MAR 1 3 20'12 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

J.R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

We received your letter dated February 21, 2012, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft expansion memo to expand certification of the Los Alamos 

National Laboratory (LANL). The purpose of the memo is to add High Energy Real-Time Radiography 

(HE RTR), a new piece of characterization equipment, to Central Characterization Project's transuranic 

waste characterization program at LANL. EPA had not inspected operation of this unit, and therefore, 

wanted to evaluate objective evidence supporting its operation prior to concurring with this draft 

expansion memo. As a result, we requested DVDs and batch data reports, which EPA reviewed. Based 

on our review, we concur with CBFO's draft expansion memo which will allow LANL to use the HE 

RTR to identify physical contents of the remote-handled waste being characterized at LANL. We plan to 

evaluate the operation of the HE RTR the next time we are at LANL. 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU waste are appropriately 

included in Attachment 4 of the draft certification expansion memo. The waste characterization 

equipment, procedures and processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals 

at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft certification memo for INL CCP. If 

you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343- 

9422. 

Sincerely, 

/ 

C 

Rajani Joglekar 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 1 DO°/a Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Court Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Site Documents, CBFO 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,098] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on June 9, 2009, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of American Roller Bearing, Hiddenite, North Carolina. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition (TA-W-71,074) filed on June 3, 2009 that is the subject of an ongoing investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of July 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-18654 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT FO R THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21-0083, DA 21-0084, DA 21-0085 IN THE MATTER OF: M.L.W., J.R.W. AND E.R.W. Youths In Need Of Care. ORDER Upon consideration of Mother a nd Appellant’s Motion To Consoli date Cases, and with good cause shown , it is hereby ORDERED that the abovecaptioned cases will be consolidat ed for purposes of appeal und er Cause No. DA 21-0083.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 26 2021

05/26/2021
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

December 7, 2015

Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: Juan Lizcano

v. Texas

No. 15-65

(Your No. WR-68,348-03)

Dear Clerk:

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202)479-3011

RECEIVED IN

COURTOFCRIMINAL APPEALS

DEC 1 h 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

~6u\

Scott S. Harris, Clerk
#### Josephine Tabshey *v.*Sebastiano Fiume

King, C. J., Murphy, Shea, Alcorn and Comxey, Js.

Argued December 4, 1963

decided January 21, 1964

*Harold F. O’Brien,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Anthony L. DiLorenso,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Alcorn, J.

The plaintiff sued her father to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when she fell on the waxed floor of the kitchen in her father’s house. The case was tried to a jury, which failed to answer interrogatories which were submitted by the court. The jury did, however, return a general verdict awarding damages to the plaintiff. *303The defendant has appealed, assigning error in the court’s denial of a motion to set aside the verdict, in the acceptance of the verdict without answers to the interrogatories, and in the charge.

The essential facts are not disputed. It was customary for the plaintiff to visit her father’s house periodically to prepare the payroll for his employees, to run errands and to do other domestic chores for her parents. On the evening prior to her fall, the plaintiff, accompanied by her three small children, went to her father’s house, and, after putting the children to bed, retired about 9 or 9:30 p.m. After the defendant and all others in the house had retired for the night, the plaintiff’s mother waxed the kitchen floor. About 8 o’clock on the following morning, and before any of the others had arisen, the plaintiff entered the kitchen. While there she slipped on wax on the floor and fell, sustaining the injuries complained of.

There is no evidence that the plaintiff’s mother acted as the defendant’s agent in waxing the floor. She was not the defendant’s agent or servant merely by reason of the fact that she was his wife. General Statutes §§46-9, 52-79; *Laube*v. *Stevenson,*137 Conn. 469, 475, 78 A.2d 693; see *Deacy*v. *McDonnell,*131 Conn. 101, 104, 38 A.2d 181. The only condition claimed to have caused the plaintiff’s fall was the wax applied by the plaintiff’s mother after everyone else had gone to bed. There is no evidence that the plaintiff’s father, the only defendant in the case and the owner of the house, had any knowledge, either actual or constructive, that the plaintiff’s mother had waxed the floor after he had retired for the night. Before the defendant could be found negligent, there had to be evidence sufficient to establish that he had notice of the condition which caused the plaintiff’s *304fall. *Bernstein*v. *Grand Union Co.,*148 Conn. 726, 727, 169 A.2d 267; *Long*v. *Savin Rock Amusement Co.,*141 Conn. 150, 153, 104 A.2d 221. The evidence before the jury was insufficient to impose liability on the defendant, and the court should have set the verdict aside. See *Markee*v. *Turner,*140 Conn. 701, 704, 103 A.2d 533. In view of this conclusion, it is unnecessary to consider the other assignments of error.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to grant the motion to set the verdict aside.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.
ByWilliam E. Godsey, PG Engineering Geologist
- President Geo Logic Environmental Services, LLC Longview, Texas bill.godsey@geologicenvironmental.com 903-753-8200

# Introduction
 Appropriate environmental, hydrogeologic and regional geologic investigations coupled with proper well construction techniques can all but eliminate the potential for problems with adverse impact related to hydraulic fracturing.

# Purpose
 The purpose of this presentation is to outline the tasks that can be undertaken concurrent with leasing, site acquisition, permitting and development of prospect areas to identify and mitigate potential pathways of frac fluids other than intended target zones.

# Location
 Almost without exception, shale gas plays occur where existing oil and gas production, mining or known geologic structures are known. In many cases, these plays are now located in populated rural areas and urban settings where development and water supply wells are located.

# Study Area
 The area selected for study is in East Texas where the Haynesville Shale extends into and under existing oil and gas fields and underlies extensive fresh water aquifers and lignite fields. There are also numerous gas storage fields, brine injection/disposal wells and complex geologic structures located in this area.

# When to Conduct Due Diligence
 1. Prospect is developed.  2. Land is leased.  3. Conduct due diligence investigation.  4. Casing and cementing program design.

# Information Sources
 Records Research  Well Log Review  Published Reports  Economic Data  Public Records  State Geologists  University/College  GIS Mapping  Private Data Bases  Regulatory Agency  Surface Geology  Groundwater/Soil  Appraisal/Real Est.  USGS/Fed. Agency

# Aquifer Protection Investigation  Identify all aquifers  Determine base of usable quality water  Locate municipal water supply wells and/or large irrigation wells  Locate productive oil/gas intervals  Isolate pressured or lost circulation zones

# Illustrations Presented
 Oil and Gas Fields with Well Locations  Stratigraphic Column  Location Maps With Wells  Major and Minor Aquifer Maps  Alluvial Aquifer Maps  Rural Water Supply Wells

# Illustrations (continued)
 Well Log  Municipal Water Supply Well Locations  Lignite and Coal Map  Casing and Cementing Criteria

### What Tasks Needed to Complete An Appropriate Inquiry Into Potential Pathways?

 Determine Area of Well Bore Influence  Determine Regional Geologic Conditions  Indentify Hydrogeologic Setting  Locate Oil/Gas Fields/Mining Areas/Minerals  Municipal Water Supply Wells/Fields  Identify All Well Penetrations and Depths  Determine Status of Wells

# Summary and Conclusions Hydraulic fracturing can be conducted safely and aquifer protection can be provided when appropriate site investigation is conducted. Once aquifers and potential pathways of exposure are identified, casing and cementing programs can be developed to address specific applications. Geologic conditions vary from site to site and there are numerous frac methods to address the individual circumstances and assure aquifer protection.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John T. Grigsby, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/JOHN T. GRIGSBY, JR.John T. Grigsby, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

August 13, 2002

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 160 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.160
                                                 Agreed to June 28, 1996

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                          Concurrent Resolution

 
Congratulating the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone on the success 
            of their recent democratic multiparty elections.

Whereas since 1991 the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone have 
  endured a horrific civil war that has killed thousands of individuals 
  and displaced more than half the population of the country;
Whereas for the first time in almost 30 years, the Republic of Sierra 
  Leone held its first truly democratic multiparty elections to elect a 
  president and parliament and put an end to military rule;
Whereas the elections held on February 26, 1996, and the subsequent 
  runoff election held on March 15, 1996, were deemed by international 
  and domestic observers to be free and fair and legitimate expressions 
  of the will of the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone;
Whereas success of the newly elected democratic government led by 
  President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah could have a positive effect on the West 
  African neighbors of the Republic of Sierra Leone; and
Whereas the historic event of democratic multiparty elections in the 
  Republic of Sierra Leone should be honored: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
        (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone 
    for holding their first democratic multiparty presidential and 
    parliamentary elections in nearly 30 years;
        (2) encourages all people of the Republic of Sierra Leone to 
    continue to negotiate an end to the civil war and to work together 
    after taking the critical first step of holding democratic 
    elections in that country;
        (3) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to help 
    nations move toward freedom and democracy; and
        (4) further reaffirms that the United States is committed to 
    encouraging peace, democracy, and economic development on the 
    African continent.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
§ 157.6694-2 Penalties for understatement due to an unreasonable position. ( a ) *In general.* A person who is a tax return preparer of any return or claim for refund of tax under section 5891 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) shall be subject to penalties under section 6694(a) of the Code in the manner stated in § 1.6694-2 of this chapter.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable to returns and claims for refund filed, and advice provided, after December 31, 2008.
[T.D. 9436, 73 FR 78462, Dec. 22, 2008]
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4168 — Österreichische Post/trans-o-flex)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 287/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 30 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 30

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to dispense with the reading 
                         of conference reports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

Mr. Mitchell submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to dispense with the reading 
                         of conference reports.

    Resolved, That rule XXVIII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 
amended by striking ``and shall be determined without debate.'' in 
paragraph 1. and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 
``notwithstanding a request for the reading of the conference report, 
and shall be determined without debate.''.

                                 <all>
```
AMENDMENT 2 TO THE WILLIAM D. GEHL/GEHL COMPANY
                   AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                         DATED AS OF DECEMBER 19, 1997.

     THIS AMENDMENT is made by and between Gehl Company ("GEHL"), a Wisconsin
corporation with its principal place of business in West Bend, Wisconsin, and
William D. Gehl, ("Employee") as of April 19, 2000.

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, GEHL and Employee wish to amend the Employment Agreement between
the parties dated December 19, 1997, previously amended as of December 18,
1998.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

     Section 5, Change in Control, shall be revised as follows:  A new
Subsection "(e)" shall be added:

     "(e) The present value of the Employee's benefits under Section 2 of the
          Employee's most current Supplemental Retirement Benefit Agreement
          using a discount rate equal to the "GATT" interest rate that would
          be used by the Gehl Company Retirement Income Plan "B" to calculate
          the amount of a lump sum distribution to be made on the same date as
          the payment hereunder."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GEHL has caused this Agreement to be executed by its
duly authorized officers, and Employee has hereunto set his hand, all as of
the date set forth above.


                              GEHL COMPANY


                              ___________________________________
                              Its Director


                              ___________________________________
                              Employee
null

2012-03-14

198.04836

eng - Argued: 2012-03-14. Docket number: 5-11-0239
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WILLIAM MALONE,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 18-1534 (JEB)

COMMANDER IN CHIEF, et al.,

Defendants.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pro se Plaintiff William Malone initially filed this action in the Eastern District of Texas, 

which transferred it here on June 22, 2018. See ECF No. 8. Although the Complaint was 

essentially indecipherable, the Court permitted Plaintiff another opportunity to file an Amended 

Complaint that “clearly set forth what his causes of action are and the facts showing how he has 

been harmed and by whom.” Minute Order of July 12, 2018. 

In his latest 65-page iteration, see ECF No. 10, Malone attaches a number of documents 

and alludes to a number of legal theories, but never explains what he is actually suing about. For 

example, he discusses 1933 governmental actions and mentions “the design of the Roman 

papacy, spearheaded by the military order of the Society of Jesus, to overthrow the liberties of 

Private National Citizens of the United States. . . .” Id. at 15. Yet, he mentions no harm to 

himself or specific relief he is seeking.

Without any harm that he has suffered, he has no standing, and the Court thus is without 

subject-matter jurisdiction to hear his suit. It will, consequently, issue a simultaneous Order 

dismissing the case without prejudice.
2

 /s/ James E. Boasberg 

 JAMES E. BOASBERG

 United States District Judge

Date: August 28, 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2114

JUDY CURRY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

THE POCAHONTAS TIMES, County newspaper,

business, located in Marlinton, WV; PAMELA

PRITT, Personally and in her professional

capacity as Managing Editor, The Pocahontas

Times; WILLIAM P. MCNEEL, Personally and in

his professional capacity as Editor and owner,

The Pocahontas Times; JANE PRICE-SHARP,

Personally and in her capacity as Editor

Emerita and owner, The Pocahontas Times,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-106)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 14, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Judy Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Vaughan Saffer, Marlinton,

West Virginia, for Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Judy Curry appeals the district court’s order dismissing

her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Curry v. Pocahontas Times, No. CA-03-106

(N.D.W. Va. Aug. 4, 2004). We deny Curry’s motions to proceed in

forma pauperis, to suspend the briefing order, and to expedite and

transfer the case. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-30804 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. TRAVIS L. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:07-CR-70-2
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to r e p r esent Travis L

. W illiams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United S tates v . F lores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). W illiams h as not filed a response. W e have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan t p ortions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED,

cou n s e l is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 16, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-30804 Document: 00512209543 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2013
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5460 Therapeutic humidifier for home use. ( a ) *Identification.* A therapeutic humidifier for home use is a device that adds water vapor to breathing gases and that is intended for respiratory therapy or other medical purposes. The vapor produced by the device pervades the area surrounding the patient, who breathes the vapor during normal respiration.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 868.9.
[47 FR 31142, July 16, 1982; 47 FR 40410, Sept. 14, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 1120, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38795, July 25, 2001]