alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 7

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain of the standing

committees for the 103d Congress, or until their successors are chosen.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 7 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. BURNS (for Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain

of the standing committees for the 103d Congress, or

until their successors are chosen.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the mi2 nority party’s membership on the following standing com3 mittees for the 103d Congress, or until their successors

4 are chosen:

5 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, AND

6 FORESTRY: Mr. Lugar, Mr. Dole, Mr. Helms, Mr. Coch7 ran, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Craig, Mr. Coverdell, and Mr.

8 Grassley.

9 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Hatfield, Mr.

10 Stevens, Mr. Cochran, Mr. D’Amato, Mr. Specter, Mr. Do-
2

SRES 7 ATS

1 menici, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Bond, Mr. Gorton,

2 Mr. McConnell, Mr. Mack, and Mr. Burns.

3 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Thurmond,

4 Mr. Warner, Mr. Cohen, Mr. McCain, Mr. Lott, Mr.

5 Coats, Mr. Smith, Mr. Kempthorne, and Mr. Faircloth.

6 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN

7 AFFAIRS: Mr. D’Amato, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Bond, Mr.

8 Mack, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Roth, and Mr. Do9 menici.

10 COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANS11 PORTATION: Mr. Danforth, Mr. Packwood, Mr. Pressler,

12 Mr. Stevens, Mr. McCain, Mr. Burns, Mr. Gorton, Mr.

13 Lott, and Mr. Gregg.

14 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES:

15 Mr. Wallop, Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Murkowski,

16 Mr. Nickles, Mr. Craig, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Specter, and

17 Mr. Lott.

18 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS:

19 Mr. Chafee, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Durenberger, Mr. Warner,

20 Mr. Smith, Mr. Faircloth, and Mr. Kempthorne.

21 COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: Mr. Packwood, Mr. Dole,

22 Mr. Roth, Mr. Danforth, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Durenberger,

23 Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Wallop.
3

SRES 7 ATS

1 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Mr. Helms,

2 Mr. Lugar, Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. Pressler, Mr. Murkow3 ski, Mr. Brown, Mr. Jeffords, and Mr. Coverdell.

4 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS: Mr. Roth,

5 Mr. Stevens, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. McCain.

6 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Hatch, Mr.

7 Thurmond, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Specter, Mr.

8 Brown, Mr. Cohen, and Mr. Pressler.

9 COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND HUMAN RESOURCES:

10 Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Coats, Mr. Gregg, Mr.

11 Thurmond, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Durenberger.

Æ
§ 1.472-3 Time and manner of making election. ( a ) The LIFO inventory method may be adopted and used only if the taxpayer files with his income tax return for the taxable year as of the close of which the method is first to be used a statement of his election to use such inventory method. The statement shall be made on Form 970 pursuant to the instructions printed with respect thereto and to the requirements of this section, or in such other manner as may be acceptable to the Commissioner. Such statement shall be accompanied by an analysis of all inventories of the taxpayer as of the beginning and as of the end of the taxable year for which the LIFO inventory method is proposed first to be used, and also as of the beginning of the prior taxable year. In the case of a manufacturer, this analysis shall show in detail the manner in which costs are computed with respect to raw materials, goods in process, and finished goods, segregating the products (whether in process or finished goods) into natural groups on the basis of either ( 1 ) similarity in factory processes through which they pass, or
( 2 ) similarity of raw materials used, or
( 3 ) similarity in style, shape, or use of finished products. Each group of products shall be clearly described.
( b ) The taxpayer shall submit for the consideration of the Commissioner in connection with the taxpayer's adoption or use of the LIFO inventory method such other detailed information with respect to his business or accounting system as may be at any time requested by the Commissioner.
( c ) As a condition to the taxpayer's use of the LIFO inventory method, the Commissioner may require that the method be used with respect to goods other than those specified in the taxpayer's statement of election if, in the opinion of the Commissioner, the use of such method with respect to such other goods is essential to a clear reflection of income.
( d ) Whether or not the taxpayer's application for the adoption and use of the LIFO inventory method should be approved, and whether or not such method, once adopted, may be continued, and the propriety of all computations incidental to the use of such method, will be determined by the Commissioner in connection with the examination of the taxpayer's income tax returns.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11729, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7295, 38 FR 34203, Dec. 12, 1973]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00018-CR

Clifford Lee Grant, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-05-202634, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant Clifford Lee Grant guilty of tampering with physical evidence.

See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 37.09 (West 2003). The trial court assessed punishment at five years’

imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573

S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to
2

examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief or other written response has

been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

___________________________________________

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Waldrop

Affirmed

Filed: June 30, 2006

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Sean P. Nolan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AveXis, Inc.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 30, 2018

 
|     | /s/ SEAN P. NOLAN                         |
|----------|-------------------------------------------|
|     | Sean P. Nolan                             |
| * * | *President   and Chief Executive Officer* |
| * * | *(Principal   Executive Officer)*         |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      55,756,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              240,729,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (11,240,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           304,755,000
<PP&E>                                      13,915,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (10,934,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             354,864,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      242,738,000
<BONDS>                                    137,851,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       238,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (45,362,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               354,864,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           699,904,000<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              654,572,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            54,456,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,336,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (24,460,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   364,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (24,096,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                              48,356,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                17,239,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
<FN>
<F1>Represents gross revenue, which includes costs of certain services
subcontracted to third parties and other reimbursable direct project costs, such
as materials procured by the company on behalf of its customers. Gross revenue
also includes equity in net income of unconsolidated subsidiaries for purpose of
this schedule.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KEILA PALAMAR,

Petitioner

v.

JASON PALAMAR,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 518 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 166

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 23, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the

Washington for Jesus 1996 prayer rally.

Whereas One Nation Under God, Inc. has sponsored two previous prayer rallies entitled Washington for Jesus in the

city of Washington and plans a third such event over a

two-day period on April 29 and 30, 1996;

Whereas public assembly for giving thanks and praying for

the United States is a tradition in this Nation dating
2

HCON 166 RDS

from before the Nation’s founding and commemorated

each year by a national Thanksgiving holiday; and

Whereas the Washington for Jesus prayer rally provides for

the peaceable assembly and public expression of peoples

of all faiths to pray and give thanks for the United

States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION. 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR WASHINGTON

4 FOR JESUS 1996 PRAYER RALLY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—One Nation Under God, Inc. (in

6 this resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be per7 mitted to sponsor a public event (in this resolution re8 ferred to as the ‘‘event’’) over a two-day period on April

9 29 and 30, 1996 (plus one day before and one day after

10 the event to fully accommodate for setup, takedown, and

11 cleanup).

12 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The event shall be

13 free of any admission charge to the public and arranged

14 so as not to interfere with the needs of Congress, subject

15 to conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Cap16 itol and the Capitol Police Board. The sponsor shall as17 sume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities inci18 dent to all activities associated with the event.

19 (c) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—For the pur20 poses of this resolution, the sponsor is authorized to erect
3

HCON 166 RDS

1 upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound amplification

2 devices, and related structures and equipment as may be

3 required to conduct the event, subject to approval of the

4 Architect of the Capitol.

5 (d) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

6 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are authorized

7 to make any such additional arrangements as may be nec8 essary to carry out the event consistent with good order,

9 public health, safety, and protection of the Capitol and

10 the Capitol Grounds.

11 SEC. 2. SPONSORSHIP OR ENDORSEMENT.

12 Nothing contained in this resolution shall be con13 strued as an endorsement of the sponsor or the event (or

14 any related activities or expressions, religious or other15 wise). The sponsor shall not represent either directly or

16 indirectly that this resolution or any activity carried out

17 under this resolution in any way constitutes approval or

18 endorsement by the United States Government, or any of

19 its agencies, of any activity or expression, religious or oth20 erwise, of the sponsor or the event.

Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
exv10w3



 






EXHIBIT 10.3




SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

1989 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

(As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2005)




W I T N E S S E T H




     WHEREAS, Smith International, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Smith International, Inc.
1989 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for the purpose of providing additional
incentives to officers and other valued employees of the Company; and



     WHEREAS, in Section 7.7 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”)
reserved the discretionary right to amend the Plan at any time; and



     WHEREAS, the Board now desires to amend the Plan, to (i) permit an electronic Incentive
Agreement (the “Agreement”) as evidence of the award; and (ii) permit that the Agreement, with the
approval of the Board, need not be signed by a representative of the Company or a Participant but
can be accepted by electronic means.



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the dates specified below, the Plan is hereby amended by this
Second Amendment thereto, as follows:



     1. Effective as of January 1, 2006, Section 1.2(s) of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing
the definition of “Incentive Agreement” used therein with the following new definition:




     Incentive Agreement. The written agreement (whether in a hard copy or in an
electronic form approved by the Committee) between the Company and the Grantee setting forth
the terms and conditions pursuant to which an Incentive Award is granted under the Plan, as
such agreement is further defined in Section 6.1.




2. Effective as of January 1, 2006, Section 2.2(a) of the plan is here by amended by
replacing the first sentence of the Section with the following sentence:



     Each grant of a Stock Option shall be evidenced by a written Incentive Agreement, either in
hard copy or in an electronic form approved by the Committee.



     3. Effective as of January 1, 2006, Section 6.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing the
last sentence of the Section with the following sentence:




     The Incentive Agreement shall be signed by the Grantee to whom the Incentive Award is
made and by an Authorized Officer; provided, however, the Committee, in its discretion, may
from time to time approve another method of acceptance by the Grantee.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment to the Plan is hereby executed on this 17th day of
October, 2006, to be effective as of the dates specified therein.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	 	 	SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ PAMELA L. KUNKEMOELLER
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ RICHARD E. CHANDLER, JR.
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Pamela L. Kunkemoeller
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Richard E. Chandler, Jr.
	Title:

	 	Senior Corporate Counsel and
Assistant
      Secretary
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and 
     Secretary






63
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12066 and #12067]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for public assistance only for the  District of Columbia (FEMA-1882-DR), dated 03/03/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe winter storm and snowstorm. *Incident Period:*
                         12/18/2009 through 12/20/2009. *Effective Date:*
                         03/03/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/03/2010. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/03/2010
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on  03/03/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Disaster Area:*
                     District of Columbia. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12066B and for economic injury is 12067B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-5253 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as One Court Square Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as  Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2015-C Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
  Date:  June 23, 2017
 By:/s/ Mark KaczynskiMark KaczynskiPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of theservicing function)
 9