alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark B. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Giant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Giant.


                                 By:     /s/ MARK B. COX
                                    -----------------------------
                                 Name:   Mark B. Cox
                                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:   May 14, 2004.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer        Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Amended

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted), Bing Yeh, the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 18th day of January, 2008.

|/s/BING YEH                                    |  | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Bing Yeh President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, has been provided to Silicon Storage
Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
**UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA** 

) PAMELA CARTER-FROST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) Civil Action No. 15-930 (EGS) ) Defendant. ) )

**ORDER** For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion it is hereby

**ORDERED** that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff’s gender discrimination claim is **DENIED** . Only Ms. Carter-Frost’s gender discrimination regarding the defendant’s decision to laterally transfer her to the Fifth District for patrol work may proceed; and it is further

**ORDERED** that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff’s retaliation claim is **GRANTED** ; and it is further

**ORDERED** that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim is **GRANTED**

. **SO ORDERED. Signed: Emmet G. Sullivan**  **United States District Judge April 9, 2018**
§ 1.636-2 Production payments retained in leasing transactions. ( a ) *Treatment by lessee.* In the case of a production payment (as defined in paragraph (a) of § 1.636-3) which is retained by the lessor in a leasing transaction (including a sublease or the exercise of an option to acquire a lease or sublease), the lessee (or his successors in interest) shall treat the retained production payment for purposes of subtitle A of the Code as if it were a bonus granted by the lessee to the lessor payable in installments. Accordingly, the lessee shall include the proceeds from (or, if paid in kind, the value of) the mineral produced and applied to the satisfaction of the production payment in his gross income for the taxable year so applied. The lessee shall capitalize each payment (including any interest and any amounts added on to the production payment other than amounts for which the lessee would be liable in the absence of the production payment) paid or incurred with respect to such production payment. See paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of § 1.613-2 for rules relating to computation of percentage depletion with respect to a mineral property burdened by a production payment treated as a bonus under section 636(c) and this section.
( b ) *Treatment by lessor.* The lessor who retains a production payment in a leasing transaction (or his successors in interest) shall treat the production payment without regard to the provisions of section 636 and § 1.636-1. Thus, the production payment will be treated as an economic interest in the mineral in place in the hands of the lessor (or his successors in interest) and the receipts in discharge of the production payment will constitute ordinary income subject to depletion.
( c ) *Example.* The provisions of this section may be illustrated by the following example:
Example. In 1971, A leases a mineral property to B reserving a one-eighth royalty and a production payment (as defined in § 1.636-3(a)) with a principal amount of $300,000 plus an amount equivalent to interest. In 1972, B pays to A $60,000 with respect to the principal amount of the production payment plus $16,350 equivalent to interest. The adjusted basis of the property in the hands of B for cost depletion and other purposes for 1972 and subsequent years will include (subject to proper adjustment under section 1016) the $76,350 paid to A. In 1973, B pays to A $60,000 with respect to the principal amount of the production payment plus $12,750 equivalent to interest. The adjusted basis of the property in the hands of B for cost depletion and other purposes for 1973 and subsequent years will include (subject to proper adjustment under section 1016) the $72,750 paid to A. The $76,350 received by A in 1972, and the $72,750 received by A in 1973, will constitute ordinary income subject to depletion in the hands of A in the years of receipt of such amounts by A.
[T.D. 7261, 38 FR 5465, Mar. 1, 1973]
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex parte Julio Baquedano-Cardenas, * From the County Court at Law No. 1

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 1-430-20

No. 11-20-00171-CR * May 12, 2022

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,751]


Freeport McMoran Copper and Gold, Tyrone, NM; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 29, 2009, in response to a worker 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Freeport McMoran Copper and 
Gold, Tyrone, New Mexico.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an earlier petition 
(TA-W-70,264) filed on May 21, 2009, that is the subject of an ongoing 
investigation for which a determination has not yet been issued. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of July 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18050 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
§ 1.150-5 Filing notices and elections. ( a ) *In general.* Notices and elections under the following sections must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Attention: T:GE:TEB:O, Washington, DC 20224 or such other place designated by publication of a notice in the Internal Revenue Bulletin— ( 1 ) Section 1.141-12(d)(4);
( 2 ) Section 1.142(f)(4)-1; and
( 3 ) Section 1.142-2(c)(2).
( b ) *Effective dates.* This section applies to notices and elections filed on or after January 19, 2001.
[T.D. 8941, 66 FR 4671, Jan. 18, 2001, as amended by T.D. 9741, 80 FR 65646, Oct. 27, 2015]
#### Wainwright Estate

Before Klein, P. J., Bolger, Lefever, Saylor and Shoyer, JJ.

*433*White, Williams & Scott,*for exceptants.

*Pepper Bodine, Stokes & Hamilton*and *Hall, Hamilton, Wainwright & Welsh,*contra.

May 29, 1953.

Lefever, J.,

Testatrix expressly provided for three contingencies: (1) That her two sons should die leaving surviving issue; (2) that both sons should die without issue, and (3) that one son should die with issue *after*his brother had died without issue. The question now before the court is whether a gift should be implied upon the event, which actually *434occurred and which was not expressly provided for in the will, namely, the son with surviving issue died *before*the son who left no surviving issue.

A reading of the handwritten will indicates that testatrix thought she was providing for all contingencies. She apparently intended to benefit her descendants, if there were any. Thus, she created family trusts with remainders over to future generations; she gave the remainder to charity only in the event that both sons died without leaving issue.

> “The law will impute to a testator’s words such a meaning as under all the circumstances will conform to his probable intention and be most agreeable to reason and justice”: Riegel et al., v. Oliver et al., 352 Pa. 244, 247 (and cases cited).

The instant case is a typical situation requiring the application of the doctrine of gift by implication: Cope’s Estate, 353 Pa. 306; Rouse Estate, 369 Pa. 568. See Crossman Estate, 24 Dist. R. 600. The facts are exactly analogous to those in Howell’s Estate, 41 D. & C. 332.

“. . . there is a presumption testator intends to dispose of his whole estate. Such presumption, however, is met by an equally potent presumption that an heir is not to be disinherited except by plain words or necessary implication. The effect of the conflict of rules is well stated by Judge Hunter in his Pennsylvania Orphans’ Court Commonplace Book, Vol. 2, Wills, sec. 4(b), p. 1436, in the following language:

> “ ‘These presumptions are of like force and effect, and in applying one we must not overlook the other. Neither presumption, however, can be permitted to defeat the intention of the testator which is expressed in apt words or appears by clear implication.’ See Grothe’s Estate, 229 Pa. 186, 78 A. 88; French’s Estate, 292 Pa. 37, 140 A. 549; Loving Estate, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 339, 48 A. 2d 39. This language does not *435reveal an express intent by testator to die intestate as to this portion of the trust corpus”: Rouse Estate, supra, at page 572.

We all agree with the learned auditing judge “that there is an implied gift to the issue of Clement R. Wainwright, Jr., Francis King Wainwright having died without issue”.

Accordingly, the exceptions are dismissed, and the adjudication is confirmed absolutely.
#### Madeline T. Berkeley *v.*Frederick D. Berkeley III et al., Executors (Estate of Frederick D. Berkeley)

*Samuel B. Dorrance,*on the motion.

Submitted May 11

decided May 26, 1964

The motion by the defendants to strike an assignment of error in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1150 Visual acuity chart. ( a ) *Identification.* A visual acuity chart is a device that is a chart, such as a Snellen chart with block letters or other symbols in graduated sizes, intended to test visual acuity.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 33355, Sept. 2, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 35603, Sept. 14, 1988; 53 FR 40825, Oct. 18, 1988; 66 FR 38810, July 25, 2001]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

 

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as  Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates  Series 2015-SG1(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice 135605 & (80)(81)(82) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 135605 COA: 273056 Wayne CC: 06-006411-01 DERRICK CLAYTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions

for miscellaneous relief are DENIED.

t0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

RAYMOND W. FARABAUGH,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 155 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. section 1350, I, the
undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Gehl Company
(the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ William D. Gehl
Date:  May 9, 2003                         -----------------------------------
                                           William D. Gehl
                                           Chairman of the Board
                                           and Chief Executive Officer



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 has
been provided to Gehl Company and will be retained by Gehl Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
★

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas, on December 17, 1994, the helicopter of Army

Chief Warrant Officer David Hilemon and Army Chief

Warrant Officer Bobby W. Hall II was shot down over

North Korea;

Whereas, as a result of this incident, Chief Warrant Officer

Hilemon sacrificed his life for his country and Chief Warrant Officer Hall was taken captive by the Korean People’s Army;
2

HCON 1 EH1S

Whereas, on December 22, 1994, Chief Warrant Officer

Hilemon’s remains were returned to the United States at

the Demilitarized Zone at Panmunjom and on December

28, 1994, he was laid to rest with full military honors

and in full view of Mt. Rainier in the State of Washington, in accordance with the wishes of Chief Warrant Officer Hilemon; and

Whereas Chief Warrant Officer Hall, held in captivity for 13

days under stressful circumstances, served his country

above and beyond the call of duty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the sacrifice of Army Chief War4 rant Officer David Hilemon to his country and ex5 presses gratitude for his selflessness and deepest re6 gret for his loss to his family; and

7 (2) recognizes the exceptional service of Army

8 Chief Warrant Officer Bobby W. Hall II to his coun9 try and expresses commendation for his courage.

Passed the House of Representatives January 5

(legislative day, January 4), 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the sacrifice and courage of Army

North Korea on December 17, 1994.Hall II, whose helicopter was shot down overWarrant Officers David Hilemon and Bobby W.
Exhibit 10.12


 


DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION


The following
compensation arrangements have been established for the Board of Directors of
the Company: All outside directors will receive an annual retainer of $25,000. The
chairpersons of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Risk
Oversight Committee, and the Nominating / Governance Committee will for this
service receive retainers of $10,000, of $7,000, of $5,000, and of $5,000
respectively. Outside directors also receive a meeting fee of $1,000 for each
Board and Committee meeting attended. Outside directors also receive an annual
grant of $25,000 of restricted stock, which stock has 3-year cliff vesting.
Directors have the option to receive their $25,000 annual retainer in the form
of stock at a 25% premium (i.e., $31,250 of stock) if they agree to hold the
stock for at least one year. No separate compensation is paid to directors who
are also employees of the Company.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 104

Relating to Bosnia and Herzegovina’s right to self-defense.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 29 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. DECONCINI (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Relating to Bosnia and Herzegovina’s right to self-defense.

Whereas Bosnia and Herzegovina is a sovereign and independent State, a member of the United Nations, and a

participating State of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe;

Whereas the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina have been

and remain the target of armed aggression by Serbia,

Serbian-backed forces, and other irregular forces which

have subjected civilians to organized, systematic, and premeditated war crimes, crimes against humanity and

genocide;

Whereas the armed aggression and ‘‘ethnic cleansing’’ in

Bosnia and Herzegovina have resulted in human suffering and loss of life which has reached an unprecedented

scale in post-World War II Europe;
2

SRES 104 IS

Whereas diplomacy has not worked and negotiations have

consumed significant time during which the situation on

the ground in Bosnia has further deteriorated;

Whereas the United States shares with Europe not only a

moral and legal obligation, but a genuine strategic interest in ending aggression and genocide in Bosnia and

Herzegovina before it spreads elsewhere in the former

Yugoslavia and beyond; and

Whereas as a sovereign member of the United Nations,

Bosnia and Herzegovina has the right, under Article 51

of the United Nations Charter, to individual or collective

self-defense, if attacked: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the Sense of the Senate that (1)

2 the United States should, without further delay, assemble

3 and lead a multinational coalition to undertake resolute

4 action in order to prevent the wholesale slaughter and fur5 ther ‘‘ethnic cleansing’’ of innocent civilians in Bosnia and

6 Herzegovina

7 (A) by taking immediate steps to neutralize

8 heavy arms in the hands of irregular forces and

9 their supply lines in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in10 cluding through the use of military air force;

11 (B) by ensuring the immediate, effective, and

12 unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid to all civil13 ian populations in Bosnia and Herzegovina, includ14 ing through the use of military force, if required;

15 (C) by ensuring unimpeded access to all camps,

16 prisons, and detention centers in Bosnia and
3

SRES 104 IS

1 Herzegovina by the International Committee of the

2 Red Cross and other international humanitarian or3 ganizations and facilitate the release of all detainees

4 from such facilities maintained by irregular forces;

5 and

6 (D) by seeking the immediate lifting of the

7 international arms embargo as it applies to Bosnia

8 and Herzegovina, thus enabling that country to ob9 tain defensive weapons.

10 (2) The President should promptly consult with Con11 gress concerning specific steps to be taken and necessary

12 legislative measures of support and authorization for the

13 actions outlined above.

Æ