alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1.652(c)-2 Death of individual beneficiaries.

If income is required to be distributed currently to a beneficiary, by a trust for a taxable year which does not end with or within the last taxable year of a beneficiary (because of the beneficiary's death), the extent to which the income is included in the gross income of the beneficiary for his last taxable year or in the gross income of his estate is determined by the computations under section 652 for the taxable year of the trust in which his last taxable year ends. Thus, the distributable net income of the taxable year of the trust determines the extent to which the income required to be distributed currently to the beneficiary is included in his gross income for his last taxable year or in the gross income of his estate. (Section 652(c) does not apply to such amounts.) The gross income for the last taxable year of a beneficiary on the cash basis includes only income actually distributed to the beneficiary before his death. Income required to be distributed, but in fact distributed to his estate, is included in the gross income of the estate as income in respect of a decedent under section 691. See paragraph (e) of § 1.663(c)-3 with respect to separate share treatment for the periods before and after the decedent's death. If the trust does not qualify as a simple trust for the taxable year of the trust in which the last taxable year of the beneficiary ends, see section 662(c) and § 1.662(c)-2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>               THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                       INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q DATED 
                       MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                       ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                       STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER>                      1000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                          245708
<SECURITIES>                   1276127
<RECEIVABLES>                    79769
<ALLOWANCES>                      5696
<INVENTORY>                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               1720363
<PP&E>                          140362
<DEPRECIATION>                   93364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 2191576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           261062
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           238
<OTHER-SE>                     1760418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   2191576
<SALES>                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                101118
<CGS>                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    83626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 171826
<INCOME-TAX>                     68700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              99490
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                     99490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     4.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1.7519-3T Effective date (temporary).

The provisions of §§ 1.7519-1T through § 1.7519-3T are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1986.

[T.D. 8205, 53 FR 19710, May 27, 1988]
§ 1.663(c)-4 Applicability of separate share rule to estates and qualified revocable trusts. ( a ) *General rule.* The applicability of the separate share rule provided by section 663(c) to estates and qualified revocable trusts within the meaning of section 645(b)(1) will generally depend upon whether the governing instrument and applicable local law create separate economic interests in one beneficiary or class of beneficiaries of such estate or trust. Ordinarily, a separate share exists if the economic interests of the beneficiary or class of beneficiaries neither affect nor are affected by the economic interests accruing to another beneficiary or class of beneficiaries. Separate shares include, for example, the income on bequeathed property if the recipient of the specific bequest is entitled to such income and a surviving spouse's elective share that under local law is entitled to income and appreciation or depreciation. Furthermore, a qualified revocable trust for which an election is made under section 645 is always a separate share of the estate and may itself contain two or more separate shares. Conversely, a gift or bequest of a specific sum of money or of property as defined in section 663(a)(1) is not a separate share.
( b ) *Special rule for certain types of beneficial interests.* Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, a surviving spouse's elective share that under local law is determined as of the date of the decedent's death and is not entitled to income or any appreciation or depreciation is a separate share. Similarly, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, a pecuniary formula bequest that, under the terms of the governing instrument or applicable local law, is not entitled to income or to share in appreciation or depreciation constitutes a separate share if the governing instrument does not provide that it is to be paid or credited in more than three installments.
( c ) *Shares with multiple beneficiaries and beneficiaries of multiple shares.* A share may be considered as separate even though more than one beneficiary has an interest in it. For example, two beneficiaries may have equal, disproportionate, or indeterminate interests in one share which is economically separate and independent from another share in which one or more beneficiaries have an interest. Moreover, the same person may be a beneficiary of more than one separate share.
[T.D. 8849, 64 FR 72544, Dec. 28, 1999]
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 12

Expressing the sense of the Senate that meaningful reforms with respect

to agricultural subsidies must be achieved in the GATT negotiations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. PRESSLER (for himself, Mr. HEFLIN, and Mr. WALLOP) submitted the

following resolution; which was received, read twice and referred to the

Committee on Finance

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that meaningful reforms

with respect to agricultural subsidies must be achieved

in the GATT negotiations.

Whereas in 1986, negotiations on an international agreement

to reform the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

(hereafter in this resolution referred to as ‘‘GATT’’)

began in Punta del Este, Uruguay, with a targeted conclusion date of December 1990;

Whereas the United States and other major agricultural exporting nations insisted from the start on significant reductions in the subsidy programs operated by the European Community under its Common Agricultural Policy;

Whereas in December 1990, after the European Community

decided against reducing the subsidy programs of its
2

•SRES 12 IS

Common Agricultural Policy, no international agricultural subsidy reduction agreement was reached;

Whereas in November 1991, the European Community indicated some willingness to reduce its export subsidies during the GATT negotiations;

Whereas in November 1992, the European Community

agreed to certain reductions in its export subsidies;

Whereas American agriculture has a long tradition of supporting international efforts to achieve more open markets and fairer rules governing world agricultural trade;

Whereas the support of United States farmers and ranchers

for multilateral and other trade negotiations depends on

the success of the Uruguay Round GATT negotiations in

achieving agricultural subsidy reductions in the European

Community; and

Whereas any agreement under the GATT that is not supported by American farmers and ranchers would not be

acceptable to the Congress: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any

2 agreement regarding proposed changes to the GATT

3 must—

4 (1) achieve the elimination or substantial reduc5 tion of export subsidies as a means of disposing of

6 agricultural surpluses in the world market;

7 (2) achieve new and expanded foreign market

8 opportunities for United States farm products;

9 (3) ensure the European Community does not

10 offset possible reductions in its agricultural export
3

•SRES 12 IS

1 subsidies by adopting programs, such as variable lev2 ies or tariffs, which have the effect of substantially

3 limiting United States agricultural exports to the

4 European Community;

5 (4) not limit the United States ability to exer6 cise its rights under the GATT to eliminate unfair

7 trade barriers in the future; and

8 (5) achieve a sound agreement governing sani9 tary and phytosanitary regulations.

Æ
# C_2014282EN.01005402.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/54

---

Action brought on 2 July 2014 — Euroways v Commission

(Case T-503/14)

2014/C 282/72

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Euroways, SL (Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: J. De Juan Casadevall, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, if the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (STLS) is held to be unlawful State aid, order recovery only until the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the decision initiating the formal investigation, namely, 21 September 2011; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, if the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (STLS) is held to be unlawful State aid, order recovery only until the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the decision initiating the formal investigation, namely, 21 September 2011; and

Official Journal of the European Union

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-500/14 Derivados del Flúor v Commission.

Derivados del Flúor

Commission

---
#### Richard H. Moore *v.*City of New Britain

*Steven E. Perakos,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Wallace JR. Burke,*with whom was *Maxwell Heiman,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Argued April 14

decided April 14, 1964

The motion by the defendant that the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County be set aside and the case be remanded with direction to dismiss the appeal to that court for want of jurisdiction is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 84 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 84

Designating the week of June 1, 1993, through June 7, 1993, as a ``Week 
 for the National Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War 
                                 II''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 21 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

  Mr. Dole introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week of June 1, 1993, through June 7, 1993, as a ``Week 
 for the National Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War 
                                 II''.

Whereas the brave men and women of the United States made tremendous sacrifices 
        during World War II to save the world from tyranny and aggression;
Whereas the winds of freedom and democracy sweeping the globe today spring from 
        the principles for which over four hundred thousand Americans gave their 
        lives in World War II;
Whereas World War II and the events that led up to that war must be understood 
        in order that we may better understand our own times, and more fully 
        appreciate the reasons why eternal vigilance against any form of tyranny 
        is so important;
Whereas the World War II era, as reflected in its family life, industry, and 
        entertainment, was a unique period in American history, and epitomized 
        our Nation's philosophy of hard work, courage, and tenacity in the face 
        of adversity;
Whereas, between 1991 and 1995, over nine million United States veterans of 
        World War II will be holding reunions and conferences and otherwise 
        commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of various events relating to 
        World War II; and
Whereas June 4, 1993, marks the anniversary of the beginning of the Battle of 
        Midway, and June 6, 1993, marks the anniversary of D-Day: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of June 1, 1993, 
through June 7, 1993, is designated as a ``Week for the National 
Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II'', and the 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
on the people of the United States to observe the week with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 22

- 00013

- CV
THE HENDERSON
- WESSENDORFF FOUNDATION , Appellant

v. PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC. , Appellee
From the 218th Judicial District Court , Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 17

- 08

- 00196

- CVK Honorable Lynn Ellison , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 25, 2022
VACATED AND DISMISSED Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 43.2(e), the parties file d an a greed m otion requesting this c ourt: (1) va cate the trial court’s judgment that was signed on December 12, 2021; (2) dismiss the entire case with prejudice; (3) allocate costs against the party incurring same; and (4) issue its mandate. W e grant the motion, vacate the trial court’s judgment , and d ismiss the case with prejudice. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2 (e)

. The clerk of the court is instructed to issue the mandate immediately. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.1(c). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties that incurred
them. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.4

. PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 259 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 259

   Commending the President and the special delegation to Haiti, and 
          supporting the United States Armed Forces in Haiti.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 20 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
                    resolution; which was considered

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commending the President and the special delegation to Haiti, and 
          supporting the United States Armed Forces in Haiti.

Whereas the special delegation sent to Haiti on September 17, 1994, has 
        succeeded in convincing the de facto authorities in Haiti to agree to 
        leave power;
Whereas on September 18, 1994, after an agreement was reached in Port-au-Prince 
        that day, the President ordered the present deployment of men and women 
        of the United States Armed Forces in and around Haiti;
Whereas U.S. and multilateral sanctions have imposed a heavy burden on the 
        Haitian people; and
Whereas the Congress and the people of the United States have great pride in the 
        men and women of the United States Armed forces and fully support them 
        in all their efforts overseas, including those in Haiti: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the efforts of the President in sending former 
        President Jimmy Carter, retired General Colin Powell and 
        Senator Sam Nunn to Haiti in an effort to avoid the loss of 
        American lives;
            (2) fully supports the men and women of the United States 
        Armed Forces in Haiti who are performing with professional 
        excellence and dedicated patriotism;
            (3) supports the departure from power of the de facto 
        authorities in Haiti, and Haitian efforts to achieve national 
        reconciliation, democracy, and the rule of law;
            (4) supports lifting without delay of U.S. unilateral 
        economic sanctions on Haiti, and lifting without delay of 
        economic sanctions imposed pursuant to U.N. resolutions in 
        accordance with such resolutions; and
            (5) supports a prompt and orderly withdrawal of all United 
        States Armed Forces from Haiti as soon as possible.
                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  550 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2015, by and amongCREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL  ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, asOperating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as CertificateAdministrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C2 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:  August 8, 2003                   /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                        Title: President and Treasurer


                                        A  signed   original  of  this   written
                                        statement  required  by Section  906 has
                                        been  provided  to CNL Income  Fund VII,
                                        Ltd.  and will be retained by CNL Income
                                        Fund  VII,  Ltd.  and  furnished  to the
                                        Securities  and Exchange  Commission  or
                                        its staff upon request.