alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 216

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for relocation of the Portrait Monument.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 216

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas in 1995, women of America celebrated the 75th anniversary of their right to participate in our government

through suffrage;

Whereas Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Susan

B. Anthony were pioneers in the movement for women’s

suffrage and the pursuit of equal rights; and

Whereas the relocation of the Portrait Monument to a place

of prominence and esteem would serve to honor and re-
2

•HCON 216 EH

vere the contribution of thousands of women; Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol shall—

(1) restore the Portrait Monument and place it in

the Rotunda of the Capitol for one year at which time

it shall be moved to a permanent site along with an appropriate educational display, as determined by the commission created in section 3, and an alternative statue

recommended by the commission shall be placed in the

Rotunda;

(2) make all necessary arrangements for a rededication ceremoney of the Portrait Monument in the Rotunda in conjunction with the Woman Suffrage Statue

Campaign; and

(3) use no Federal funds to pay any expense of restoring or moving the statue.

SEC. 2. The Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be

used at a time mutually agreed upon by the majority leader

of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives for a ceremony to commemorate and celebrate the statue’s return to the Rotunda.

SEC. 3. A commission of 11 interested parties, including

Senators and Representatives, will be appointed. The majority leader of the Senate will appoint three members and the

minority leader of the Senate will appoint two members to
3

•HCON 216 EH

the commission. The Speaker of the House of Representatives

will appoint one member, the majority leader of the House

of Representatives will appoint two members, the minority

leader of the House of Representatives will appoint two members, and the Architect of the Capitol will serve as the eleventh member of the commission. Immediately following the

relocation of the Portrait Monument, the commission shall—

(1) select a permanent site for the Portrait Monument;

(2) plan and develop an educational display to be

located near the statue at its permanent site, describing

some of the most dramatic events of the suffragettes’

lives;

(3) select an alternative statue for permanent placement in the Rotunda of the Capitol to commemorate the

struggle of women in America for equal rights;

(4) provide its recommendation to the Senate and

the House of Representatives no later than one year

after the relocation of the Portrait Monument; and
4

•HCON 216 EH

(5) use no Federal funds to pay any expense of the

educational display and/or relocation of the Portrait

Monument.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7262

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLAYTON SAMUEL PAUL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cr-00342-NCT-1; 

1:21-cv-00560-NCT-LPA)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton Samuel Paul, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Clayton Samuel Paul seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and construing his “Motion Requesting Review 

of Conviction” as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissing it as successive and 

unauthorized. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, 

the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and 

that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Paul has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Marty E. Adams                             
|Marty E. Adams                                 
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

July 28, 2006

The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alector, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: March 26, 2019 |   |   | /s/ Arnon Rosenthal                               |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   | Arnon Rosenthal, Ph.D.                                 |
|                 |   |   | Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Communications, February 2, 2009, 6:30 p.m. to 8 p.m., Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20814 and the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board, February 3-4, 2009, 8 a.m. to 12 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 21, 2009 74 FR 3622.                 

This notice is amended to cancel the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Communications and to change the end time of the National Cancer Advisory Board closed session on February 3 to 5:15 p.m. The closed session will be held from 4 p.m. to 5:15 p.m. Also, to change the start time of the open session of the National Cancer Advisory Board meeting on February 4 to 8:30 a.m. 

Dated: January 22, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-1863 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### d'opci6n del:Plan; D)'consideraca la 

### los I Fondados de utter. " e'Limpio de'1997 

### [ el avance=de la ael de calidad' del uestos de emisiori a'dopt"ar y ejecutar

~ vNx tomaran en de 2009. NOTAi D " `considerara' la iajo.`El Plan?y el' 

### SMAQMD'en diciembre, 2008: 

### sa del Pian;y del
todas las partes imonibs orales o bhcas„o engiarsel I am the principal clerk of the EL HISPANO, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Sacramento, Countyof Sacramento, and which newspaper has been adjudged a news

### paper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County P of Sacramento, State of Califomia, under date of October 8,1968, Case Number205413. The notice, ofwhichthe annexed is aprinted copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of saidLos distritos proi newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following llevaran a- c,abo'.; Regional de Ozox dates, to wit: 12/24/08 ". 'ul' TliaMiin -TiTuf.iR

I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tme and correct. EI plar triuesfra que la-reg sobre la norma d'e `emi'sii reduccl6n d'e'la emtsiori i aire El Plan fambtEn actu para'el trarispotte y"de°e'oi Signature n'uevas medidas` de co'n'£ro

Dated: 12/24/08


# El Hispano

P.O. BO% 2856 SACRAMENTO, CA 95812

Mail Proof of Publication to:
A 95814 

## SMAQMD 777 12th Street 3rd Floor 

### Sacramento, CA 95814

\.95618 , .

r
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Represents gross revenue which includes costs of certain services subcontracted
to third parties and other reimbursable direct project costs, such as materials
procured by the company on behalf of its customers.  Gross revenue also includes
equity in net income of unconsolidated subsidiaries for purpose of this
schedule.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      19,969,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              193,951,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (9,719,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           226,482,000
<PP&E>                                      14,089,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (11,320,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             271,475,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      208,567,000
<BONDS>                                    124,329,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       234,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (70,860,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               271,475,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           218,854,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              199,888,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,871,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (3,546,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,549,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (75,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,326,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,326,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00015-CR

Ronald Lee Verdi, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 

NO. D-11-0505-SA, THE HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R F O R C L E R K T O P R O V I D E

A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by 

a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he 

provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine 

the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro 

se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with 

this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted in part. We hereby direct the clerk of the 

trial court to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to 
provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record 

was provided, on or before July 3, 2015. See id. at 321. Appellant’s brief is due 120 days from 

the date he receives the record. The remainder of the relief requested is denied.

It is ordered on June 23, 2015.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Do Not Publish
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’SREGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31,2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the“CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS bythe Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and

1122(d)(4)(xii) (the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activitiesNTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS hasdetermined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) ofthe SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered bythis report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer usingNTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
2006 Form 10-K Exhibit 10.12





EXHIBIT 10.12



SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS



 

Non-employee directors of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (the "Company") will receive the following compensation in
2007:



	An annual retainer fee of $25,000;





	The committee chairpersons will receive additional annual fees as follows:





	
Board of Directors Chairperson
	
$10,000

	
Audit Committee Chairperson
	
$20,000

	
Compensation Committee Chairperson
	
$15,000

	
Nominating & Governance Committee Chairperson
	
$10,000







	A fee payable for each meeting attended of the Company's Board of Directors, or committee thereof, equal to $1,500 for each
meeting attended in person and $750 for each meeting attended telephonically;





	Reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend such meetings;





	A restricted stock grant of 1,500 shares of common stock on January 1, 2007 under the Company's Amended and Restated 1997
Stock Award and Incentive Plan, such shares vesting in full on January 1, 2010; and





	A tax "gross-up" fee of $60,240, equal to 40% of the value of the restricted stock grant of 1,500 shares of common stock based on
the closing price of our common stock on January 1, 2007.




The Company's non-employee directors may elect to defer all or any portion of the fees above in accordance with the Company's
deferred compensation plan for its directors.


Directors who are also employees of the Company will not receive any compensation for their services as directors of the
Company.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 199

Recognizing and honoring the activities of the United States Coast Guard

Yard in Curtis Bay, Maryland, and the service of members and civilian

employees of the Coast Guard during World War II.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 12 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Ms. MIKULSKI (for herself and Mr. SARBANES) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring the activities of the United States

Coast Guard Yard in Curtis Bay, Maryland, and the

service of members and civilian employees of the Coast

Guard during World War II.

Whereas for 95 years, the United States Coast Guard Yard

located in Curtis Bay, Maryland, has built a reputation

for expert construction and repair of small boats, medium

size cutters and buoy tenders, and large cutters;

Whereas through World War I, World War II, the Korean

War, and the Vietnam era, the United States Coast

Guard Yard has been the primary shipyard for the shipbuilding and repair activities of the Coast Guard;
2

•SRES 199 IS

Whereas employees of the United States Coast Guard Yard

have earned numerous honors and awards for their service with the yard, including a Coast Guard Unit Commendation Medal for exceptionally meritorious service,

the First Annual Commandant’s Quality Award, and,

most recently, the 1994 Department of Transportation

Secretary’s Annual Quality Award;

Whereas the history of the United States Coast Guard Yard

reflects a spirit and dedication that is indicative of the

‘‘can do’’ attitude of the Coast Guard and of the employees of the yard;

Whereas the Coast Guard cutters U.S.C.G.C. Mendota and

U.S.C.G.C. Pontchartrain were launched from the United

States Coast Guard Yard in 1944;

Whereas the cutters U.S.C.G.C. Mendota and U.S.C.G.C.

Pontchartrain were the largest cutters launched from the

United States Coast Guard Yard during World War II;

Whereas on April 25, 1994, the United States Coast Guard

Yard will sponsor the Coast Guard National World War

II Commemoration Celebration the theme of which celebration will be ‘‘The Home Front and Industrial Production’’; and

Whereas on that date, the family and friends of employees of

the United States Coast Guard Yard will gather to celebrate and honor the successes, sacrifices, and dedication

of veterans and former civilian employees of the Coast

Guard: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognize and honor—

2 (1) the service of former members and civilian

3 employees who served aboard the Coast Guard cut-
3

•SRES 199 IS

1 ters U.S.C.G.C. Mendota and U.S.C.G.C. Pont2 chartrain during World War II; and

3 (2) the contributions made by the past and

4 present employees of the United States Coast Guard

5 Yard located in Curtis Bay, Maryland, to the suc6 cessful discharge by the Coast Guard of its many

7 duties.

Æ
§ 1.6302-3 Deposit rules for estimated taxes of certain trusts. ( a ) *Requirement.* A bank or other financial institution described in paragraph (b) of this section shall deposit all payments of estimated tax under section 6654(l) with respect to trusts for which such institution acts as a fiduciary by the date otherwise prescribed for paying such tax in the manner set forth in published guidance, publications, forms and instructions.
( b ) *Banks and financial institutions subject to this requirement.* The requirement of paragraph (a) of this section applies to banks and other financial institutions described in sections 581 and 591 that have been designated as authorized Federal tax depositaries described in section 6302(c) and that act as fiduciaries for at least 200 trusts to which section 6654(l) applies that during the calendar year are required to make installment payments of estimated tax with respect to such trusts. For purposes of this section, a fiduciary is the person responsible for filing the tax returns and paying the taxes with respect to a trust.
( c ) *Cross-references.* For the requirement to deposit estimated tax payments of taxable trusts by electronic funds transfer, see § 31.6302-1(h) of this chapter.
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to deposits and payments made after December 31, 2010.
[T.D. 8192, 53 FR 12008, Apr. 12, 1988; T.D. 8192, 53 FR 13464, Apr. 25, 1988, as amended by T.D. 8723, 62 FR 37492, July 14, 1997; T.D. 8952, 66 FR 33831, June 26, 2001; T.D. 9507, 75 FR 75900, Dec. 7, 2010]