alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38219-38220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY-957400-09-L14200000-BJ0000-TRST]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 38220]]

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to file the 
plats of survey of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days 
from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs and is necessary for the management of 
these lands. The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines and a portion of the subdivision of 
section 10, and the survey of the subdivision of section 11, and the 
metes and bounds surveys of certain parcels, Township 1 South, Range 4 
East, of the Wind River Meridian, Wyoming, Group No. 787, was accepted 
July 27, 2009.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the Second Standard Parallel North, through Range 2 East, 
the subdivisional lines and adjusted meanders of the right bank of 
South Fork Owl Creek, and the survey of the subdivision of section 35, 
Township 9 North, Range 2 East, of the Wind River Meridian, Wyoming, 
Group No. 788, was accepted July 27, 2009.
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines and a portion of the subdivision of 
section 9, and the metes and bounds survey of Parcel A, section 9, 
Township 1 South, Range 2 East, of the Wind River Meridian, Wyoming, 
Group No. 789, was accepted July 27, 2009.
    Copies of the preceding described plats and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: July 27, 2009.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. E9-18287 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
Edison International Executive Perquisites



 Exhibit 10.53 
 PERQUISITES 
 Estate and Financial Planning Program – up to $20,000 per year for Chairman and CEO, up
to $10,000 for others with rank of elected VP and above.* 
 Company car – Chairman and CEO of Edison International 
 Car service – CEO and CFO of EMG (shared car to Irvine), CFO of EIX and SVP of Generation of SCE. This arrangement was made when these officers were
asked to take on new assignments in 2005, as it was less expensive for the company than relocation. The cars are equipped to enable the officers to work during the commute, which they typically do. Tax gross-up is provided for this perquisite, as it
is provided pursuant to a business purpose. 
 Car allowance – $1,000 per month for officers of Edison International and Southern
California Edison Company with rank of elected VP and above except for the Chairman and CEO.* Eligible officers are expected to have a suitable business car that is well maintained. 
 Executive Health Enhancement Program – executive physical at UC Irvine or USC or reimbursement of up to $1,500 per year for screening or preventive
services not covered by health plan, for officers with rank of elected VP and above.* 
 Club memberships are not a formal perquisite for
officers, but are subject to management approval based on business considerations. 
  

 * Elected VPs of EMG are eligible for perquisites provided to those with the rank of elected VP and above effective January 1, 2006 (and were not
eligible for those benefits in 2005). 
  

 1
NUMBER 13-17-00669-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

LINCOLN WADE KILSBY, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On appeal from the 36th District Court 

of San Patricio County, Texas.

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the 

appellate record. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has 

been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has 
2

the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before April 23, 2018, and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the 

appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first 

made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty 

days thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

12th day of April, 2018.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              48,938
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      592,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,385,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,087,801
<PP&E>                                           1,443,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,911,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,626,608
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            10,753
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,274,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,911,387
<SALES>                                          2,933,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,933,797
<CGS>                                            1,271,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,887,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,275,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,275,609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,275,609)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.21)


</TABLE>
NO. 12-08-00154-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§

IN RE: ROBERT W. FROST,

RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 21, 2008, this court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for writ

of mandamus filed by Robert W. Frost as relator. That opinion ordered Respondent, the Honorable

Thomas A. Dunn, Judge of the County Court at Law of Smith County, to vacate his order granting

Cynthia Frost’s motion to disqualify Robert W. Frost’s attorney and to enter an order denying the

motion to disqualify. On June 5, 2008, Respondent signed an order complying with this court’s

opinion and order of May 21, 2008.

All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus

proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this

original proceeding is dismissed.

 BRIAN HOYLE 

 Justice

Opinion delivered June 11, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 141

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the

name of the Senate in United States v. Durenberger, et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus

curiae in the name of the Senate in United States v.

Durenberger, et al.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Durenberger, et al.,

Cr. No. 3–93–65, pending in the United States District

Court for the District of Minnesota, Senator Dave

Durenberger is charged with conspiring to submit false

claims to the Senate and his codefendants are charged

with making false statements to the Select Committee on

Ethics in affidavits that Senator Durenberger submitted

to the Committee;

Whereas, this case places in issue Senator Durenberger’s

privilege under the Speech or Debate Clause, Article I,

Section 6, Clause 1 of the Constitution, to be free from
2

SRES 141 ATS

questioning in any other place about his communications

to the Ethics Committee; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(c), 706(a), 709(l), and

713(a) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2

U.S.C. 288b(c), 288e(a), 288h(1), and 288l(a) (1988),

the Senate may direct its Counsel to appear as amicus

curiae in the name of the Senate in any legal action

which places in issue the powers and responsibilities of

Congress under the Constitution, including the privilege

of Members to be free from questioning in any other

place about any speech or debate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to appear as amicus curiae in the name of the Senate in

3 United States v. Durenberger, et al., to defend the con4 stitutional privilege of Senators under the Speech or De5 bate Clause to be free from questioning in any other place

6 about their communications to the Select Committee on

7 Ethics.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7488

PAUL CROSS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

M CRUZ, Warden FCI Williamsburg,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-00089-TLW)

Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Cross, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Paul Cross, a federal prisoner, appeals the district 

court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 (2012) petition, and denying his motion to alter or amend 

the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Cross v. Cruz, No. 1:14-cv-00089-TLW

(D.S.C. July 2, 2014; Sept. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. Con. Res. 160 Agreed to June 28, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Congratulating the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone on the success of their

recent democratic multiparty elections.

Whereas since 1991 the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone

have endured a horrific civil war that has killed thousands of

individuals and displaced more than half the population of the

country;

Whereas for the first time in almost 30 years, the Republic of

Sierra Leone held its first truly democratic multiparty elections

to elect a president and parliament and put an end to military

rule;

Whereas the elections held on February 26, 1996, and the subsequent runoff election held on March 15, 1996, were deemed by

international and domestic observers to be free and fair and

legitimate expressions of the will of the people of the Republic

of Sierra Leone;

Whereas success of the newly elected democratic government led

by President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah could have a positive effect

on the West African neighbors of the Republic of Sierra Leone;

and

Whereas the historic event of democratic multiparty elections in

the Republic of Sierra Leone should be honored: Now, therefore,

be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Congress—

(1) congratulates the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone

for holding their first democratic multiparty presidential and

parliamentary elections in nearly 30 years;

(2) encourages all people of the Republic of Sierra Leone

to continue to negotiate an end to the civil war and to work

together after taking the critical first step of holding democratic

elections in that country;

(3) reaffirms the commitment of the United States to help

nations move toward freedom and democracy; and
H. Con. Res. 160—2

(4) further reaffirms that the United States is committed

to encouraging peace, democracy, and economic development

on the African continent.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00167

- CV

STEPHENS & JOHNSON OPERATING CO. ; Henry W. Breyer, III, Trust; CAH,

Ltd.

- MOPI for Capital Account; CAH, Ltd.

- Stivers Capital Account; CAH, Ltd.

- Wiegand Resources Capital Account Wiegand Resources; C.T. Carden; Myrl W. Deitch Trust; E.R. Godbout Family Trust; Margaret J. Godbout; F.R. Keydel; R.L. Keydel; Pennye K. Maloney;

David R. McNi tt; RCA Trust One; Donald B. Scott; Sunset Production Corporation; Genessee Country Museum Appellant s

v.

Charles W. SCHROEDER , Elsie A. Schroeder Schneider, Hollis London, Terry Mengers Reel, Ted Mengers, Debbie Mengers Quates, August H. Setinmeyer, Carole Schroeder

Mi ller, James M. Schroeder, Sally Schroeder Tinanus, James E. Schroeder, Sue Schroeder Stanford, Bill Schroeder, Wayne Hennecke, Diane Hennecke Rhodes, Jerri James, W. Tom Hailey, and Peggy Hailey Appellee s

From the 229th Judicial Dis trict Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC

- 04

- 143 Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellants have filed a motion for a forty

- five day extension of time to file their brief.

We grant the motion and order appellants’ brief due December 1, 2014

. Appellants are

advised that no further extensions of time will be gra nted absent a motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be comple ted and filed by the requested extended deadline.

________________________________ _ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
O.K. Shaun:

### RE:CostEffectivenessThresholds Linero,Alvaro 

### to:ShaunBurke Cc: JeffKadish,"Koerner,Jeff',"Vielhauer,Trina" 05/061201009:05AM

The KUA and Lake Worth permitting and technical documents I sent you are public records so you canprovide them to anyone. Again, the $2,600/ton value ascribed to Florida in the referenced survey is a reflection of what SCR cost for a gas-fueledpowerplant project at the time of the survey rather than a cost-effectiveness tipping point. Thankyou, Al Linero

-----Original Message----- From: Burke.Shaun@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Burke.Shaun@epamail.epa.govl Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:56 AM To: Linero, Alvaro Cc: Kodish.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov Subject: RE: Cost Effectiveness Thresholds Al Can EPA include your email in the comments to North Dakota on a power plant permit? NO is claiming that $4,200-4,800 is not cost effective and one of the things that supports that is the survey that showed Florida treated $2600 as a cost line. Your explanation of this is rebuttal on that. Did you want to put that into a more concise email that just addresses the survey without the rest of the information? Or can we submit your email as an attachment? Thanks Shaun

Shaun Burke Senior Environmental Engineer Air Enforcement Division, U. S. EPA 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW (MC 2242A) Washington, DC 20460 burke.shaun@epa.gov (202) 564-1039
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40341

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERALD LEE POWERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(L-96-CR-163-1)

March 5, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DAVIS and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charged with interference with a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

111, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18
2

U.S.C. § 922, Gerald Lee Powers pled guilty to both charges, reserving his right to

appeal the denial of a motion to suppress certain critical evidence relative thereto.

Having considered the briefs and oral arguments of the parties and pertinent parts

of the record, and finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-209410) pertaining to the 2011 Option Plan, 2016 Share Option and Incentive Plan, and Non-Plan Share Options of BeiGene, Ltd. of our report dated March 29, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of BeiGene, Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 
| /s/ Ernst &   Young Hua Ming LLP |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Beijing, People’s   Republic of China     |   |
| March 29, 2016                            |   |

 

----
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 224

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate for the use of the recording

studio and mass mailings with respect to uncontested elections.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. FORD, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

JUNE 21 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate for the use

of the recording studio and mass mailings with respect

to uncontested elections.

1 Resolved, That (a) paragraph 1 of rule XL of the

2 Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by striking the

3 period at the end and inserting ‘‘, unless the candidacy

4 of the Senator in such election is uncontested.’’.

5 (b) Paragraph 6(a) of rule XL of the Standing Rules

6 of the Senate is amended by striking the period at the

7 end and inserting ‘‘, unless the candidacy of the Senator

8 in such election is uncontested.’’.
2

SRES 224 ATS

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 20, 2014

No. 04-14-00167-CV

STEPHENS & JOHNSON OPERATING CO.; Henry W. Breyer, III, Trust; CAH, 

Ltd.-MOPI for Capital Account; CAH, Ltd.-Stivers Capital Account; CAH, Ltd.-Wiegand 

Resources Capital Account Wiegand Resources; C.T. Carden; Myrl W. Deitch Trust; E.R. 

Godbout Family Trust; Margaret J. Godbout; F.R. Keydel; R.L. Keydel; Pennye K. Maloney; 

David R. McNitt; RCA Trust One; Donald B. Scott; Sunset Production Corporation; Genessee 

Country Museum

Appellants

v.

Charles W. SCHROEDER, Elsie A. Schroeder Schneider, Hollis London, Terry 

Mengers Reel, Ted Mengers, Debbie Mengers Quates, August H. Setinmeyer, Carole Schroeder 

Miller, James M. Schroeder, Sally Schroeder Tinanus, James E. Schroeder, Sue Schroeder 

Stanford, Bill Schroeder, Wayne Hennecke, Diane Hennecke Rhodes, Jerri James, W. Tom 

Hailey, and Peggy Hailey

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-04-143

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellants have filed a motion for a forty-five day extension of time to file their brief.

We grant the motion and order appellants’ brief due December 1, 2014. Appellants are 

advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion that (1) 

demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the 

efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable 

assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 123 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 123

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 To provide for the provisional approval of regulations applicable to 
   certain covered employing offices and covered employees and to be 
      issued by the Office of Compliance before January 23, 1996.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 123

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS.

    The regulations applicable to employing offices which are not the 
House of Representatives or the Senate and covered employees who are 
not the employees of the House of Representatives or the Senate which 
are to be issued by the Office of Compliance before January 23, 1996, 
are hereby approved on a provisional basis until such time as such 
regulations are approved in accordance with section 304(c) of the 
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1384(c)).

            Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```