alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 142

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1996

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Regarding the human rights situation in Mauritania,

including the continued practice of chattel slavery.

Whereas the Government of Mauritania has perpetrated a

prolonged campaign of human rights abuses and discrimination against its indigenous black population;

Whereas the Department of State and numerous human

rights organizations have documented such abuses;

Whereas chattel slavery, with an estimated tens of thousands

of black Mauritanians considered property of their mas-
2

HCON 142 RFS

ters and performing unpaid labor, persists despite its

legal abolition in 1980;

Whereas individuals attempting to escape from their owners

in Mauritania may be subjected to severe punishment

and torture;

Whereas the right to a fair trial in Mauritania continues to

be restricted due to executive branch pressure on the judiciary;

Whereas policies designed to favor a particular culture and

language have marginalized black Mauritanians in the

areas of education and employment particularly;

Whereas Mauritanians are deprived of their constitutional

right to a democratically elected government;

Whereas Mauritanian authorities have still refused to investigate or punish individuals responsible for the massacre

of over 500 military and civilian black Mauritanians in

1990 and 1991; and

Whereas significant numbers of black Mauritanians remain

refugees stripped of their citizenship and property, including tens of thousands of black Mauritanians who

were expelled or fled Mauritania during 1989 and 1990:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) calls upon the Government of Mauritania to

4 honor its obligations under the Universal Declara5 tion of Human Rights and the Convention on the

6 Abolition of Slavery, to prosecute slave owners to the

7 fullest extent of the country’s anti-slavery law, and
3

HCON 142 RFS

1 to educate individuals being held as slaves on their

2 legal rights;

3 (2) strongly urges the Government of Mauri4 tania to abolish discriminatory practices and foster

5 an environment that will integrate black

6 Mauritanians into the economic and social main7 stream;

8 (3) urges in the strongest terms that the Gov9 ernment of Mauritania fully investigate and pros10 ecute those officials responsible for the extrajudicial

11 killings and mass expulsions of black Mauritanians

12 during the late 1980s and early 1990s;

13 (4) calls upon the Government of Mauritania to

14 continue to allow all refugees to return to Mauri15 tania and to restore their full rights;

16 (5) welcomes Mauritania’s recent invitation to

17 international human rights organizations to visit

18 Mauritania; and

19 (6) further welcomes the growth of an inde20 pendent press in Mauritania.

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10(d)(8)

                               EIGHTH AMENDMENT
                                    TO THE
                        ICF KAISER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                RETIREMENT PLAN


     WHEREAS, the ICF Kaiser International, Inc. Retirement Plan (hereinafter
referred to as the "Plan") was established effective August 1, 1971; and

     WHEREAS, the Plan was most recently restated effective January 1, 1996, by
ICF Kaiser International, Inc. (currently known as Kaiser Group International,
Inc. and hereinafter referred to as the "Company"); and

     WHEREAS, the restated Plan was amended subsequently on seven occasions; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide for full vesting;

     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of June 1, 2000, Article III of the Plan is
hereby amended by the addition of Section 3.8 at the end thereof to provide as
follows:

          3.8  Full Vesting.  Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to
               ------------
     the contrary, effective as of June 1, 2000, each Participant shall be fully
     vested in his Account.


          Executed this  8th day of June, 2000.
                        ----

                           KAISER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                           (formerly known as ICF Kaiser International, Inc.)


                           By:   /s/ James J. Maiwurm
                              --------------------------------
                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
39792.

#### ARMSTRONG v. THE STATE.

Eranktjm, Judge.

The purported bill of exceptions in this case recites the history of the case, including a statement that a motion for new trial was filed and amended and that the same came on for a hearing before the trial judge who after hearing argument overruled the motion and refused to grant a new trial. Following this recitation Armstrong designates himself as plaintiff in error and the State of Georgia as defendant in error, and he then specifies the portions of the record alleged to be material “to a clear understanding of the errors complained of.” Next, the bill of exceptions states that “Plaintiff in error . . . -assigns error on all the rulings herein complained of as being contrary to law, the principles of justice and equity; and as complained of in the three original grounds of the motion for a new trial.” No ruling or judgment is assigned as error in the bill of exceptions as being contrary to law, the principles of justice and equity, and the bill of exceptions contains no assignment of error on the final judgment, which was the overruling of the motion for new trial. It therefore presents nothing for a decision by this court. Accordingly, the writ or error must be dismissed. *Code Ann.*§ 6-901; *Loftin v. State,*16 Ga. App. 195 (84 SE 833); *Hardison v. Guerry,*23 Ga. App. 498 (98 SE 392); *Griffin v. Garrard,*42 Ga. App. 337 (156 SE 270); *Livingston v. Harry Somers, Inc.,*43 Ga. App. 367 (158 SE 617); *Combs v. State,*72 Ga. App. 793 (35 SE2d 315); *Ayares Small Loan Co. v. Maston,*78 Ga. App. 628, 629 (4) (51 SE2d 699); *J. L. Todd Auction Co. v. Bryan,*105 Ga. App. 206 (124 SE2d 295); *764
      *Brannen v. Buie,*208 Ga. 193 (65 SE2d 808); *Fulton County v. Philips,*208 Ga. 795 (69 SE2d 865).

Decided October 16, 1962.

*H. Alonzo Woods,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter C. McMillan, Jr., Solicitor General,*contra.

*Writ of error dimissed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 20 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res. 20
                                                 Agreed to March 1, 1995

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used from 8 o'clock 
ante meridiem until 3 o'clock post meridiem on April 27, 1995, for 
ceremonies as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of 
victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremonies 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.2040 Medical image hardcopy device. ( a ) *Identification.* A medical image hardcopy device is a device that produces a visible printed record of a medical image and associated identification information. Examples include multiformat cameras and laser printers.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
[63 FR 23387, Apr. 29, 1998, as amended at 84 FR 71819, Dec. 30, 2019]
#### Lucille C. Wells *v.*Selden E. Wells, Jr.

It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute her appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County with proper diligence, it is ordered that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

*729
      *Harry Hammer,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Paul B. Grooberf,*for the appellee (defendant).

Argued December 3

decided December 3, 1963
§ 1.6043-1 Return regarding corporate dissolution or liquidation. ( a ) *Requirement of returns.* Within 30 days after the adoption of any resolution or plan for or in respect of the dissolution of a corporation or the liquidation of the whole or any part of its capital stock, the corporation shall file a return on Form 966, containing the information required by paragraph (b) of this section and by such form. Such return shall be filed with the district director for the district in which the income tax return of the corporation is filed. Further, if after the filing of a Form 966 there is an amendment of or supplement to the resolution or plan, an additional Form 966, based on the resolution or plan as amended or supplemented, must be filed within 30 days after the adoption of such amendment or supplement. A return must be filed under section 6043 and this section in respect of a liquidation whether or not any part of the gain or loss to the shareholders upon the liquidation is recognized under the provisions of section 1002.
( b ) *Contents of return* — ( 1 ) *In general.* There shall be attached to and made a part of the return required by section 6043 and paragraph (a) of this section a certified copy of the resolution or plan, together with any amendments thereof or supplements thereto, and such return shall in addition contain the following information: ( i ) The name and address of the corporation;
( ii ) The place and date of incorporation;
( iii ) The date of the adoption of the resolution or plan and the dates of any amendments thereof or supplements thereto; and
( iv ) The internal revenue district in which the last income tax return of the corporation was filed and the taxable year covered thereby.
( 2 ) *Returns in respect of amendments or supplements.* If a return has been filed pursuant to section 6043 and this section, any additional return made necessary by an amendment of or a supplement to the resolution or plan will be deemed sufficient if it gives the date the prior return was filed and contains a duly certified copy of the amendment or supplement and all other information required by this section and by Form 966 which was not given in the prior return.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12108, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6949, 33 FR 5531, Apr. 9, 1968; T.D. 7926, 48 FR 55847, Dec. 16, 1983]
128 STAT. 4 PUBLIC LAW 113–75—JAN. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 667: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 159 (2013): Feb. 25, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 160 (2014): Jan. 8, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–75 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To redesignate the Dryden Flight Research Center as the Neil A. Armstrong Flight 

Research Center and the Western Aeronautical Test Range as the Hugh L. 

Dryden Aeronautical Test Range. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF DRYDEN FLIGHT RESEARCH CENTER. 

(a) REDESIGNATION.—The National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA) Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Center 

in Edwards, California, is redesignated as the ‘‘NASA Neil A. Armstrong Flight Research Center’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the flight 

research center referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to 

be a reference to the ‘‘NASA Neil A. Armstrong Flight Research 

Center’’. 

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF WESTERN AERONAUTICAL TEST RANGE. 

(a) REDESIGNATION.—The National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA) Western Aeronautical Test Range in California is redesignated as the ‘‘NASA Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical 

Test Range’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the test 

range referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘NASA Hugh L. Dryden Aeronautical Test Range’’. 

Approved January 16, 2014. 

Jan. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 667] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
EX-10.33



 





Exhibit
10.33



On June 8, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hudson City Bancorp,
Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation and Hudson City Savings Bank, a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company (the “Bank”), reviewed the compensation paid to its directors for their
service as directors of the Company and the Bank and approved the following compensation program
for non-employee directors, effective July 1, 2006.
Effective July 1, 2006, non-employee directors will receive the following cash compensation for
service on the Boards of Directors of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings Bank and
the respective Board committees:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Non-Employee Board Member Compensation
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer
	 	$	50,000	 
	Meeting Fee
	 	$	1,000	 
	Lead Independent Director Compensation
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer
	 	$	35,000	 
	Non-Employee Committee Member
Compensation
	 	 	 	 
	Meeting Fee
	 	$	1,000	 
	Committee Chair Annual Retainers
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	15,000	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	10,000	 
	Nominating & Governance Committee
	 	$	5,000	 





The cash compensation described above represents combined compensation for non-employee directors’
service to both Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings Bank. Compensation is paid by the
Bank and Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. reimburses the Bank for a part of the compensation paid to each
director that is proportionate to the amount of time which he or she devotes to the performance of
services for the Company. A single fee is paid when the Company and the Bank hold joint board or
committee meetings. The Lead Independent Director is an ex officio member of all Board committees
and presides over executive sessions of the Independent Directors of the Board but does not receive
meeting fees for his attendance at committee meetings or executive sessions.
#### William Geriak et al. *v.*John Geriak et al.

King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.

Argued December 4

decided December 4, 1968

*Julius B. Kuriansky,*for the appellants (defendant Mildred Geriak et al.).

*George W. Scott, Jr.,*with whom, on the brief, was *Richard W. Martin,*for the appellees (plaintiffs).

*Frederick M. Tobin,*for the appellee (defendant Ann G. Roth).

*Thomas J. Lauricella,*for the appellee (named defendant).

Per Curiam.

There is no error. General Statutes § 52-502.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VICOR CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

SYNQOR, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2022-1593

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,702.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Vicor Corporation moves unopposed to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Case: 22-1593 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 01/13/2023
2 VICOR CORPORATION v. SYNQOR, INC.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

January 13, 2023

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: January 13, 2023

Case: 22-1593 Document: 27 Page: 2 Filed: 01/13/2023
No. 07-16-00085-CV

In the Interest of S.D., L.D., A.D., 

 and J.E., Children

§

§

§

§

From the 364th District Court 

 of Lubbock County

July 29, 2016

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 29, 2016, it is ordered, adjudged 

and decreed that the order of the trial court granting the termination of appellant J.D.’s 

parental rights be affirmed. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that appellant 

Jason E.’s appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that 

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C33 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from November 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

  | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2015, byand among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC,as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agentand Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-LC23 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 252

To designate the week of March 12–18, 1995, as ‘‘National Manufacturing

Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 23 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Mr. D’AMATO (for himself and Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate the week of March 12–18, 1995, as ‘‘National

Manufacturing Week’’.

Whereas, throughout the history of the United States, manufacturing has contributed substantially to the economic

well-being of the Nation;

Whereas manufacturing is an essential yet often overlooked

component of the economic foundation of the United

States;

Whereas a strong manufacturing industry contributes to continued growth, prosperity, and high-paying jobs in every

other sector of the national economy;

Whereas manufacturing directly employs more than 18 million workers, and at least 18 million workers in the serv-
2

SRES 252 IS

ice sector depend on a sound manufacturing sector for

their jobs;

Whereas manufacturing accounts for many of the highest

paying jobs in the economy, and manufacturing wages

are 20 percent higher on the average than

nonmanufacturing wages;

Whereas, in the 1980’s, manufacturing increased from 20 to

23 percent of the gross national product and manufacturing productivity in the last decade has increased at an

annual rate of 3.6 percent, 3 times faster than the rate

at which nonmanufacturing activity has increased;

Whereas the quality revolution has been one of the most important factors contributing to the recent resurgence of

manufacturing in the United States;

Whereas manufacturing is an important source of tax revenue for the Federal Government, and State and local

governments;

Whereas the continued leadership of the United States in

science and technology is inherently linked to the success

of manufacturing;

Whereas manufactured goods account for more than 80 percent of the trade deficit of the United States, indicating

that manufacturing is especially important to overall national competitiveness and international trade;

Whereas a sound manufacturing economy is an essential preconditioning for a strong national defense;

Whereas the Nation’s schoolchildren should be educated

about job opportunities in manufacturing; and

Whereas the people of the United States should be educated

about the role manufacturing plays in the economy, inter-
3

SRES 252 IS

national competitiveness, and the standard of living of

the Nation, and about the challenges and changing nature of manufacturing: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the week of March 12–18, 1995, is

2 designated as ‘‘National Manufacturing Week’’, and the

3 President is authorized and requested to issue a proclama4 tion calling on the people of the United States to observe

5 the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ