### August 10, 2015

Exemption No. 12382 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 1817

Mr. Aaron M. Miller
CAMA Ventures LLC DBA Andrew Ciesler Photography
7768 Westcroft Drive Sylvania, OH 43560

Dear Mr. Miller :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

By letter dated May 13, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on
behalf of CAMA Ventures LLC dba Andrew Ciesler Photography ( hereinafter petitioner or operator ) for an exemption . The petitioner requested to operate an unmanned ai rcraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial videography and photography

.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA des cribing the p roposed operations and
the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a DJI Inspire 1

.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates

. In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of P ublic Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44704, and in

### 2

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the
aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft
meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from
14 CFR part 21

, C ertification procedures for pr oducts and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection 1



### . The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption No s

. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab s , Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the pe titioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 ;

• The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and
11213 also apply to the situation you present; and

• A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, CAMA Ventures LLC dba Andrew Ciesler Photography is granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23( a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection

. This exemption is subject to the conditions
and limitations listed below.

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (part iculate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by
instruments aboard the UA.

### 3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, CAMA Ventures LLC dba Andrew Ciesler Photography is
hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Inspire 1 when weighing less than 5 5 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption

.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are

not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the
aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or
U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maint ains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times ;

e lectronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation fo r the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in thi s grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating
documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and
limita tions in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents,

### 4

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The ope rator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present up dated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FA A’s UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS op eration or flight characteristics, e.g.

, replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and mu st remain at
least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it i s in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

, inoperable comp onents, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the
UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and
aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a
current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Col u mbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the flight revi ew requirements specified in
14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

### 5

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and
main taining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with
14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (trai ni ng, proficiency, and experience

- building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operat ions may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During
traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under special visual f light rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport sym bo l as denoted on the current
FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If t he UAS loses communications or loses its GPS sign al, the UA must return to a

pre

- determined location within the pr ivate or controlled

- access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibit ed from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by t he manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All operations shall be cond ucted in accordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to con duct operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA

.

### 6

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N− Number) mar kings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and
activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonpartici pating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons
from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons r emain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons ; and
b. The owner/ controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard

.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or control led

- access property with permission from the property owner/controller or aut horized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the opera tional area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported
to the FA A's UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions
contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.

### 7

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a mot ion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the a rea of proposed filming. The 3

- day notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;
b. Name and phon e number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of th e person responsible for the on

- scene operation of the UAS;
d. Make, model, and serial or N− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;
f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made available to th e inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and
h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes
essential t o accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

### 8

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/
John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures

### 1

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 CAMA Ventures LLC DBA Andrew Ciesler Photography

7768 Westcroft Dr. Sylvania, OH 43560
(419) 318-9318 aaron@cieslerphotography.com

May 13, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);14 CFR Part 21;14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b); 13 C.F.R. 61.133(a); 91.7 (a);91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b); 91.109;91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) & (b);91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1) ; 91.409 (a) (2);91.417 (a) & (b).

Dear Sir (s) /Madam (s) :

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ( "Reform Act") and 14 C.F.R. Part 11,
CAMA Ventures LLC , an Ohio limited liability company, DBA Andrew Ciesler Photogra phy (ACP), the operator of a DJI Inspire 1 ("UA"), seeks an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") as listed and discussed below.

ACP’s team has flown its UAs, for recreational purposes, for hundreds of hours without incident. ACP’s UAs are equipped to take aerial videography and photography to enhance awareness for those individuals and companies unfamiliar with the geographical layout of cert ain areas and augment real estate listings and promote the use of certain real estate properties which provides an enhancement to academic research being performed in certain geographical areas. ACP’s UAs also serve to capture spec ific moments via videography or photography as seen fit by a client to capture (ie: aerial photography for group photos, weddings, reunions and other such client-sanctioned events) ("purpose").

ACP’s exemption request will permit the operation of comparatively inexpensive UAs in ti ghtly controlled, predetermined and limited airspace. This airspace will include areas away from general pu blic, airports, heliports and vehicular traffic for community videos, and within property boundaries for real esta te listing videos and photos and for other videography and photography purposes as a client may see fit. Currently, simila r lightweight, remote controlled UAs are legally operated by unmonitored and untrained amateur hobbyists with no safety plan or controls in place to prevent catastrophic events. ACP has safety protocols and controls in plac e to avoid and prevent public hazards as well as preventing the interference with

manned aircraft which could cause a hazard or catastrophe. This acts to enhance safety protocols unique to ACP’s lightweight UAs being utilized specifically for real estate and personal videography and phot ography as contracted by a client. ACP is able to record flight data and other information gained through permitted flight operations which may be shared with the FAA through any required FAA reports to assist with the development of future FAA protocols and safety regulations.

The use of ACP's UAs for t hese purposes reduces the need to operate conventional aircraft, typically needed to perform these types of operations, provides an economic benefit to the business consumer as the ACP UAs provides higher quality imagery at a fraction of the cost of aerial videogra phy and photography us ing conventional aircraft. These savings result in not only enhanced efficiency and productivity for the affected activities but added environmental and safety benefits to the public at large.

### 2

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 As described more fully below, ACP' s requested exemption would authorize commercial operations of aerial videography and photography, using ACP 's UAs, which will be operated under controlled conditions at an altitude of no greater than three hundred (300) feet AGL in airspace that is li mited in scope and will have automated control features. As outlined below, the airspace in which ACP's UAs will op erate within will be disclosed to the FAA in advance to flight operation. Finally, ACP 's UAs will be used in lieu of comparatively hazardous operations now conducted with fixed wing and rotary
conventional aircraft which should reassure the FAA that t hese operations will achieve at least an equivalent level or greater level of safety.

In the interest of economic efficiency and public safety, AC P hereby respectfully applies for an exemption from the listed FARs to allow commercial operations of ACP's UAs, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation's ("Administrator") responsibilities under Section 333(c) of the Reform Act to "establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system."

As discussed above and more fully described below, the requested exempti on would permit the operation of small, unmanned and relatively inexpensive UAs under controlled conditions in airspace that is limited and predetermined. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Administrator responsibilities to "

... establis h requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspa ce system." Please see Section 333(c)
of the Reform Act.

Additionally, the FAA has already granted a previous exempti on which is essentially identical to the exemption being sought by ACP. Please see FAA Exemption No. 11138 and FAA Exemption No. 11464.

The name and address of the applicant is: CAMA Ventures LLC DBA Andrew Ciesler Photography 7768 Westcroft Dr. Sylvania, OH 43560 (419) 318-9318

REGULATIONS FROM WHICH THE EXEMPTION IS REQUESTED

14 C.F.R. Part 21
14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b)
13 C.F.R. 61.133( a )
14 C.F.R. 91.7( a )

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b )(2)
14 C.F.R. 91.103
14 C.F.R. 91.109
14 C.F. R. 91.119
14 C.F.R. 91.121
14 C.F.R. 91.151( a ) 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 91.405( a )
14 C.F.R. 91.407( a )(1)
14 C.F.R. 91.409( a )(2) 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b)

### 3

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress' goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system (NAS) before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of
the Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary is required to determine which types of UAs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to national security in light of the following: • The UA's size, weight, speed, and operational capability; • Operation of the UAs in close proxim ity to airports and populated areas; and • Operation of the UAs within visual line of sight ("VLOS") of the operato r

.

Reform Act§ 333 ( a ).

Lastly, if the Secretary determines that su ch vehicles "may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system." Id. §333(c) (emphasis

added ). ACP interprets this provision to place the duty on the Administrator to not only process applications for exemptions under section 333

, but for the Administrator to craft conditions for the safe operation of the UA, if it should

be determined that the conditions set forth herein do not fulfill the statutory requirements for approval.

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority by its terms includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under §40101 of the Act; that includes UAs, from the requirement
that all civil aircraft must have a current airworthiness certificate.

The Administrator may grant an exempti on from a requirement of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702-44716 of this title if the Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. §44701(f). See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203 (a) (1).

ACP's UAs are rotorcraft weighing less than seven (7) pounds including energy source(s), equipment and any payload. They operate, under normal conditions at a ground speed of no more than thirty (30) knots and have the capability to hover, and move in the vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. The UAs will operate only in line of sight and within safe operating parameters as outline in the owner’s manual. Su ch operations will insure that the UA will "not create a

hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public " ( Reform Act Section 333 (b))

.

Given the small size of the UAs involved and the restricted environment within which they will operate, ACP falls squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption,

allow commercial operations of UAs to commence immediately. Also due to the size of the UAs and the restricted areas in which the relevant UAs will operate, approval of the application presents no national security issue. Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, reduction in environmental impacts, including reduced emi ssions associated with allowing UAs for

aerial videography and photography operations, the grant of the requ ested exemptions is in the public interest. Additionally, there is economic e fficiency created with the use of ACP 's UAs as the typical cost to perform aerial videography and photography with helicopters and airplanes heavily multiplies the cost to business consumers

and government agencies, including law enforcement, for t he services which are to be provided by ACP

.

THE EXTENT AND BASIS OF THE RELIEF SOUGHT BY ANDREW CIESLER PHOTOGRAPHY Andrew Ciesler Photography (ACP) submits this application in accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95 §§ 331-334, seeking relief from any currently applicable FARs operating that presently prevents ACP from contemplated commercial video-graphic, photographic and other flight operations within the national airspace system. The Reform Act in Section 332 provides for such integration of ci vil unmanned aircraft systems into our national airspace system as it is in the

### 4

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 public's interest to do so. ACP 's UAs meet the definition of "small unmanned aircraft" as defined in Section 331 and therefore the integration of ACP 's ultralight weight UAs is ex pressly contemplated by the Reform Act. ACP would like to operate its ultralight weight UAs prior to the time period by which the Reform Act requires the FAA to promulgate rules governing such craft. This exemption allows ACP to provide direct experience and valuable information for formal regulation that can be administered uniformly to all commercia l UA aerial videography and photography. The Reform Act guides the Administrator in determining the types of UAs that may operate safely in our national airspace system. These considerations include: weight, size, speed and overall capabilities of the UAs; whether the UAs will be operated near airports or heavily populated areas and; whether the UAs will be operated by line of sight (112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a)). Each of these items is favorable to the granting of an exemption to ACP . ACP 's UAs utilize four (4) counter-rotating propellers for balance, control and stability along a built in ca mera and sonar system for added stability and safety. ACP 's UAs are equipped with GPS and auto return safety technology. ACP 's UAs weigh less than seven (7) pounds including camera and gimbal assembly. ACP puts safety first when considering any UA f light. ACP’s small UAs are designed to hover in place via GPS and operate in less than a 24 knot (27 mph) wind. In order to increase safety plus stability and limit harm and financial loss of property, ACP will not fly its UAs in winds exceeding 20 knots (23 mph). ACP's esta blished safety systems include a GPS mode that allows its UAs to hover in place when ra dio controls are released. ACP's UAs have three modes to choose from, ACP utilizes the Inte lligent Orientation Control (IOC) Flight (with GPS & compass module) for aerial videography and photography. Intelligent Orientation Control (IOC) Flight (with GPS & compass module) includes safe circle for operation, position hold, self-leveling, altitude command, GPS, return home feature, and safety control to return home or land in the event of communica tion interruption between RC transmitter and UA. This mode is the safest, most reliable and stable mode to prevent accidents and being a hazard to others. When pilot communication is lost, ACP's UAs are designed to return then slowly des cend to the point of takeoff. ACP does not operate its UAs near airports, hospitals, police heliports or news channel helipor ts. ACP does not operate its UAs in areas where general public is within fifty (50) to one hundred (100) yards depending on location, conditions and weather. ACP's pilots and observers are constantly on alert for any manned aircraft and prepared to immediately abort and land the UA at the nearest and safest ground point in the event a manned aircraft approaches or the ACP pilot or observer suspects a manned aircraft may approach the operating area of a ACP UA. ACP's UAs are capable of vertic al and horizontal operations, and are flown only within line of sight of the pilot. ACP's UA fli ghts generally last eighteen to twenty-two (18-22) minutes with an altitude under three hundred (300) f eet and utilize battery power rather than combustible fuels. ACP does not operate its UAs below the manufacturer's recommended minimum charge levels for operation preferring to remain well within a safe operating range to insure adequate communication between radio control and the UAs to eliminate potential for crashes, loss of control or hazard. ACP’s UAs have a feature to automatic ally return to takeoff point w hen battery capacity is at the minimally required point to safely return. Fully charged reserve batteries are on hand to insure replacement for a sufficiently safe level of operation. ACP operates very conservatively and will not take risks that may cause a crash or that could create hazard to the public, propert y and manned aircraft. ACP has logged numerous practice flights in order to simulate flights for future commercial use to gain familiarization with the characteristics of th is specific UA's performance under different temperature and weather conditions.

ACP is extremely cautious when operating of its UAs and will not "create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public" (112 P.L. 95 § 333 (b)). G iven the small size and weight of ACP's UAs, they fall well within Congress's contemplated safety zone wh en it promulgated the Reform Act and the corresponding direct ive to integrate
UAs into the national airspace system. ACP's UAs, utilized in hobby flight, have a demonstrable safety record and do not pose any threat to the general public or national security.

ANDREW CIESLER PHOTOGRAPHY’S REQUEST WILL BENEFIT THE PUBLIC AT LARGE Aerial videography and photography for geographical awareness and for real estate marketing and promotion has been around for a long time through the use of manned fixed wing airc raft and helicopters. The challenge for smaller real estate companies and average landowners is that the expense re lated to manned videography and photography is cost prohibitive. Typically, only large businesses, large high end real estate companies and high net worth landowners are able to absorb such an enormous expense. This deprives non-luxury landowners and small revenue real estate companies from the enjoying the benefit of th is valuable marketing and promotional tool. Manned aircraft pose a clear threat to the general public through potential catastrophic crashes that may occur. There are many documented events where a manned aircraft has crashed into populated areas with the size and combustibility of these manned aircraft causing large property damage, human injuries and loss of life. ACP's UAs pose no such threat since size and lack of combustible fuel alleviates any of these potential threats to the public.

### 5

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 With the passage of the Reform Act, Congre ss has already procla imed that it is in the public's interest to integrate commercially flown UAs into the national airspace system. T he grant of the exemption request by ACP furthers the public interest through academic and visual awareness of the geographical benefits of ce rtain areas and by making this cost effective alternative available to small real estate compani es and the average landowner. ACP's ultralight UAs are battery powered and create no emissions that may harm the environment. In the unlikely event of an ACP UA crash, the consequence is far less than a full size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft, which are heavy and contain combustible fuel, crashing and causing catastrophic devastation to the public.

The public's interest is furthered as ACP minimizes ecol ogical and crash threat by permitting aerial videography and photography captured through ACP 's battery operated ultralight UA s. Permitting ACP to immediately fly within national air space furthers not only public safety but economic growth. Granting ACP's exemption reques t substantially furthers the economic impact for any community and for companies looking to relocate or build in a certain community as well as individuals looking to relocate to a community for career advancement through academic and geographical awareness provided by ACP. In the end, the grantin g of this exemption to ACP will serve as a benefit and stimulus to any community.

ACP’S EXEMPTION WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY AND WILL PROVIDE A LEVEL OF SAFETY AT LEAST EQ UAL TO EXISTING FAA STANDARDS ACP's exemption will not adversely affect safety, as it will in fact enhance safety. ACP's ability to log significant, controll ed and monitored flight time in FAA controlled airspace will allow ACP to contribute to the innovation and implementation of new, novel and undiscovered safety protocols for realtors that may be embraced by the National Association of Realtors, (NAR, http://www.realtor.org/ ) through consistent and ongoing cooperation with the FAA. Additionally, the FAA may utilize the new safety protocols for the use of UAs in FAA controlled airspace for all industries.

ACP submits the following representations of enhancements to current aerial videography and photography:

• ACP's UAs weigh less than 7 pounds complete with the camera and gimbal assembly;

• ACP will only operate its UAs below three hundred (300) feet which is well within the four hundred (400) feet ceiling having been established by the Reform Act of2012;

• ACP's UAs only operate for eighteen – twenty-two (18-22) minutes per flight;

• ACP lands its UAs prior to manufacturer's recommended minimum level of battery power;

• ACP's pilots operate the UAs through Visual Line of Sight only;

• ACP's UAs have a GPS flight safety feature whereby the UA hovers and then slowly lands if communication with the pilot is lost;

• ACP actively analyzes its flight data and other sources of information to constantly update and enhance its safety protocols;

• ACP only operates in reasonably safe environments which are strictly controlled and away from power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas;

• ACP conducts extensive pre-flight inspections and protocol to ensure safety remains the primary concern;

• ACP always obtains all necessary permissions from the FAA and landowners prior to the operating its UAs and;

• ACP has established safety procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or any potential danger.

ACP's safety protocols provide a level of safety equal to or exceeding existing FAA rules. It is important to note that absent the integration of commercial UAs into our national ai rspace system, manned fixed wing airplanes and helicopters

are the primary means of aerial videography and photography for community awareness and real estate uses. While the safety record of such helicopters is outstanding, there have been incidents involving loss of life as well as extensive property damage due to crashes of these manned aircraft and it is far safer and less expensive to operate a battery powered ultralight UA to accomplish the same task. T he potential for loss of life is great diminished with a UA as ACP's UAs carry no people or fuel on board and the UAs are also ve ry small and versatile which allows ACP to avoid hazards quickly and safely.

### 6

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 Accordingly, ACP respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption without delay.

AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY ACP proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to civ il aircraft that have the characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These limitations provide fo r at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current regulatory structur e because the proposed operations represent a safety enhancement to the operations conducted with conv entional aircraft. The FAA has noted in past exemptions that "Conventional aerial video operations, using jet or piston-powered ai rcraft present risks associated with ai rcraft that weigh in the neighborhood of 5,000 to 7,000 pounds or more, carry large quantities of fuel, passengers, and, in some cases, cargo. Such aircraft must fly to and from the survey location. Please see FAA Exemption 11110.
These limitations and conditions to which ACP agrees to be bound when conducting all operations under an FAA issued exemption include: 1. The UAs will weigh less than seven (7) pounds

. 2. Maximum total flight time for each operati onal flight will be twenty-two (22) minutes. 3. Flights will be terminated at fifteen per cent (15%) battery power reserve should that occur prior to the twenty-two (22) minute limit. 4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than three hundred (300) feet AGL. 5. Minimum crew for each operation will cons ist of the UA Pilot and a Visual Observer ("VO"). 6. The UAs will only operate within a safe area. 7. A briefing will be conducted with regard to the pl anned UA operations prior to flight operations. It will be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing duties with regard to the flight operations be present for this briefing. 8. The Pilot and VO will have been trained in operation of UAs generally and received up-to-date information on the particular UA to be operated and the UA will be operated in conformity with ACP's protocols.
9. The PILOT and VO will at all times be able to communicate via voice communication. 10. Written and/or oral permission from the relevant prop erty holder(s), or their aut horized representative(s), will

be obtained. 11. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies. 12. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA will return to the launch site of the UA, or another more appropriate site, and land. 13. The UA will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

14 C.F.R. PART 21, SUBPART H: AIRWORTHINESS CERTIFICATES 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (A)(1) Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates , establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). Given the size and limited op erating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by ACP, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meet s the requirements of an equiva lent level of safety under
Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UA. In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UA operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the restricted environment and under t he conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an ai rworthiness certificate wit hout the restrictions and conditions proposed.

The UAs to be operated hereunder is less than seven (7) pounds fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates exclusively within a se cured area. Unlike other civil aircraft,

### 7

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and m onitored by both the operator, and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide security for the area of operation as is now done with conventional aerial videography and photography . Lastly, application of these same crit eria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to national security pos ed by the UAs, due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a substantial external load.

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (B). MARKING OF THE AIRCRAFT The regulation requires: “When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the re gistration number is display ed on limited, restricted or light-sport category airc raft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpi t, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," "experimental," or "provisional," as applicable.”

Even though the UAs will have no airworthine ss certificate, an exemption may be needed as the UAs will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the wo rds "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," "experimental," or "provisional," may be placed. Given the size of the UAs, two-inch lettering will be imposs ible. The word "experimental," or any other term as is so required, will be placed on the fuselage of the UAs in compliance with §45.29 ( t ).

The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having t he UAs marked on its fuselage as required by §45.29 (t) where the pilot, observer and others working with the UAs will see the identification of the UAs as "Experimental." The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation to Exemptions Nos. 10700, 8738, 10167 and 10167A.

14 C.F.R. § 61.113(A) & (B); 61.133(A): PRIVATE PILOT PRIVILEGES ANDLIMITATIONS; PILOT IN COMMAND;

COMMERCIAL PILOT PRIVILEGES AND LIMITATIONS: PILOT IN COMMAND Section 61.113(a) & (b) limit private pilots to no n-commercial operations. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries a pilot, passengers, and cargo, the UA in this case is remotely controlled with no passengers or pr operty of others on board. Section 61.133(a) requires an individual with a commercial pilot's license to be pilot in command of an aircraft

for compensation or hire. ACP respectfully proposes that operator requirements should take into account the characteristics of the particular UA. ACP 's UAs have various built-in technical cap abilities that strictly limit the potential for operation outside of the operating conditions set forth in the exemption application including a fly back to launch point to terminate the flight. Since hobbyists are not required to have a pilot license, ACP requests exemption for the need of the pilot to be licensed as a pilot by the FAA.

ACP UAs contain the following safety features:

• Detection of lost GPS or of insufficient satellites initiates an immediate return to launch location.

• Low power on the aircraft triggers escalating alarms at 30% and 15% levels.

• The aircraft weighs less than seven (7) pounds, fully loaded.

Given these safety features, ACP proposes that operators of the UAs should note be required to hold a commercial pilot's license.

ACP notes that the FAA has found that safety factors permitted operation of UAs by operators with these qualifications in the case of operations pursuant to public COAs where the mandatory operat ing conditions specified above are present. Please see Federal Aviation Administration, Notice N-8900.227, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Operational Approval, at 20-21 (July 30, 2013). The FAA has the statutory authority, granted at 49 U.S.C.§44701(f) to waive the pilot requirements for commercial operations.

Given these conditions and restrictions, an equivalent level of safety will be provided by allowing operation of ACP 's UAs

without a commercial pilot's license, under the conditions set forth herein.

### 8

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 The risks associated with the operation of ACP 's UAs (given its size, speed, operational capabilities, and lack of combustible fuel) are so diminished from the level of risk associated with private pilot operations or commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 with conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorc raft), that allowing operations of the UAs as set forth above meets or exceeds the present level of safety provided under 14 C.P.R. § 61.113(a) & (b) and does not rise to the level of requiring a commercial pilot to operate the aircraft under §61.133(a).

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non -commercial operations. Because the UAs will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of safety of current operations by not requiring the pilot operating the aircraft to have a commercial pilot's license to operate these small UAs. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the UAs are remotely controlled with no living thing on board. The area of operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights are planned and coor dinated in advance. The level of safety provided by ACP exceeds that provided by a single individual holding a commercial pilot's certificate operating a conventional aircraft. The risks associated with the operation of the UAs are so diminished from the level of risk associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that allowing operations of the UAs as requested with a private pilot as the PILOT exceeds the present level of sa fety achieved by 14 C.P.R. §61.113 (a) & (b).

14 C.F.R. §91.7(A): CIVIL AIRCRAFT AIRWORTHINESS The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate i ssued for the aircraft, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements for maintenance and use of safety check lists prior to each flight.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (B) (2): CIVI L AIRCRAFT FLIGHT MANUAL IN THE AIRCRAFT Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides, “No person may operate a U.S. registered civil aircraft...(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof.”

The UAs, given their size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft.

### 9

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAs will

have immediate access to it. The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation: Please see FAA Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602,32827, and 10700.

14 C.F.R. § 91.103: PREFLIGHT ACTION This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manual s will not be provided for the aircraft an exemption will be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be provided. The pilot will take all actions including reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and

takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight.

14 C.F.R. §91.109: FLIGHT INSTRUCTION Section 91.109 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls.

UAs and remotely piloted ai rcraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. Please see FAA Exemption Nos. 5778K & 9862A. T he equivalent level of safety is provided as neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by the size and speed of the aircraft.

14 C.F.R. §91.119: MINIMUM SAFE ALTITUDES Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119( d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for UAs that are a helicopter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to three hundred (300) feet AGL, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, except for t he limited conditions, the UAs will never operate at higher than three hundred (300) feet AGL. It will however be operat ed in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre- obtained consent.

The equivalent level of safety will be achiev ed given the size, weight, speed of the UAs as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be ta ken without the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner(s), or their authorized representative(s), all affected individuals w ill be aware of the planned flight operations. When one compares the flight operations proposed herein with aircraft or rotorcraft weighing far in excess of the less than seven (7) pounds and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these proposed operations is far less than those presently presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below five hundred (500) feet AGL. In addition, the low altitude operations of the UAs will ensure separation between these small UAs operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119.

14 C.F.R. §91.121 ALTIMETER SETTINGS

This regulation requires each person operati ng an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is

set "...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure." As the UA may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, confirming the alti tude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude
indicator before flight.

### 10

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(A): FUEL REQUIREMENTS FOR FLIGHT IN VFR CONDITIONS Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual fr om beginning "a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed- (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at

least 45 minutes."

Michael's Drone Photography believe s that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to twenty-two (22) minutes or fifteen perce nt (15%) of battery power whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the UAs to their planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area.

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, and 10808.

14 C.F.R. §91.203 (A ) AND (B): CARRYING CIV IL AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION AND REGISTRATION The regulation provides in pertinent part: (a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate

.... (b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is di splayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew.

The UAs fully loaded weight is no greater than seven (7) pounds and is operated without an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and re gistration documents or to display them on the UA.

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping th ese documents at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UA will have immediate access to them to the extent they are app licable to the UA. The FAA has issued numerous exemptions to this regulation. A representative sample of other except ions includes Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A, 9797, 9797A, 9816A, and 10700.

14 C.F.R. §91.405 (A); 407 {A) (1); 409 (A) (2); 417(A) & ( B ): MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS These regulations require that an aircra ft operator or owner "shall hav e that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...," and others shall insp ect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.

Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to ACP. Maintenance will be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these sm all UAs are very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas for limited periods of ti me. If mechanical issues arise the UAs may land immediately and will be operating from no higher than three-hundred (300) feet AGL. The operator will ensure that the UAs are in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required ma intenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety.

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed:

ACP seeks an exemption from the following rules: 14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C. F.R 45.23(b);14 C.F. R. §§ 61.113( a) & (b);91.7 (a); 91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203 (a) and (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle weighing less than fifty-five (55) pounds (25 Kg) in its operations.

### 11

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 Approval of exemptions a llowing commercial operations of UAs in the purposes outlined above (or similar operations) will enhance safety by r educing risk. Conventional aerial videography and photography operati ons, using jet or piston power aircraft, operate at extremely low altitudes just feet from the object being photographed and often in extreme proximity to people and structures; and present the risks associated with vehicles that weigh in the neighborhood of four thousand (4,000) pounds, carrying large amounts of jet A or other fuel (one hundred and forty (140) gallons for jet helicopters). Such aircraft must fly to and from the site's location. In contrast, a UA weighing less than seven (7) pounds and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried

on board. The UA is carried to the site of the purposes outlined above (or similar operations) and not flown to the site. The UA will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights.

The operation of small UAs, weighing less than seven (7) pounds, conducted in the strict conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting ACP

from the requirements of Part 21 and allowing co mmercial operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and people.

PRIVACY All flights will occur over private, controlled or approved property with the property owner's, or their authorized representative, prior consent and knowledge. The aerial videography and photography will be of structures and property whose owner, or autho rized representative, has consented to the aerial videography a nd photography or otherwise have agreed to be in the area where aerial videography and photography will take place. The grant of this exemption request will provide improved safety in all operations.

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of2012- size, weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas and operation within visual line of sight and national security-provide more than adequate justification for the granting of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of ACP 's UAs.

SUMMARY OF ACP'S REQUEST FOR AN FAA EXEMPTION
1. ACP’s UAs must weigh less than seven (7), including energy source(s) and equipment. Operations authorized by the grant of an exemption are limited to the following aircraft: Michael's Drone Photography's UA aircraft variant, bearing serial # CC26195937365C onward as additional UAs are utilized by ACP provided the additional UAs are of the same or similar specifications as the UA bearing serial

# CC26195937365C

. Any proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to

amend this grant.

2. ACP 's UAs may not be flown at a ground speed exceeding thirty (30) knots.

3. ACP 's flights must be operated at an altitude of no more than three hundred (300) feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL.

4. ACP 's UAs must be operated within the VLOS of the pilot at all times. This requires the pilot to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses.

5. All ACP operations must utilize a VO. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the pilot always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and pilot must be able to communicate verbally at all times. 6. Prior to each flight the pilot must insp ect the UA to ensure it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspection
reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UA, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UA is found to be in a condition for safe flight. A Ground Control Station, if utilized, must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must

### 12

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 be properly documented in the aircraft records. 7. Any UA that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UA's operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The pilot
who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the UA's aircraft records of the flight.

8. ACP must follow the manufacturer's UA aircraft/component, maintenanc e, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. When unavailable, aircraft maintenance/component/overhaul, replacement, and inspection/maintenance requirements must be established and identified. At a minimum, requirements for the following may be included in protocols and controls to be established by ACP :

a. Actuators/Servos; b. Transmission (single rotor); c. Power plant ( motors ) ;
d. Propellers; e. Electronic speed controller;

f. Batteries; g. Mechanical dynamic components (single rotor);

h. Remote command and control; 1. Ground control station (if used); and J. Any other components as determined by ACP

. 9. Prior to operations conducted for the purposes outlined above (or similar operations), the pilot must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b), a minimum of twenty-five (25) hours of total time as a UA rotorcraft pilot (single blade or multi-rotor) and at least ten (10) hours logged as a UA pilot with multi-rotor UA which is similar to the UA to be utilized pursuant to this exemption. Prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations may satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience-building flights must be conducted under an exemption to accomplish the required flight cycles and flight ti me. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PILOT must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119. 10. Prior to operations conducted for the purposes outlined above (or similar operations), the PILOT must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b), a minimum of five (5) hours as a UA pilot operating the make and model of UAs to be utilized for operations under the exemption and three (3) take-offs and three (3) landings in the preceding ninety (90) days. Training proficiency, experience-building, and take-off and landing currency flights can be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time and ninety (90) day currency. During training, proficiency, experience-building, and take-off and landing currency flights all persons not e ssential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the pilot must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119. 11. ACP shall not permit the pilot to operate the UAs for the purpose of aerial videography or photography (or similar operations), unless the pilot has demonstrated and logged in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), the ability to safely operate the UAs in a manner consistent with how the UA will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and main taining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. 12. The UA may not be operated dire ctly over any person, except aut horized and consenting personnel and persons, below an altitude that is hazardous to persons or property on the surface in the event of a UA's failure or an emergency. 13. At all times, those persons must be essential to the purposes outlined above (or similar operations). Because these procedures are specific to participating persons, no further FSDO or aviation safety inspector approval is necessary for reductions to the distances specified in ACP's manuals. 14. ACP's flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels,

### 13

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 vehicles, and structures unless: a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonpartic ipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipati ng persons leave such protection and

are within 500 feet of the UA, flight oper ations must cease immediately and/or; b. The aircraft is operated near vess els, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permiss ion and the pilot has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and; c. Operations nearer to the PILOT, VO , operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per§ 91.119( a ).

15. If the UAs lose communications or loses its GPS signal, the UAs must return to a pre-determined location within the security perimeter and land or be recovered. 16. The UAs must abort the flight in the ev ent of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies. 17. Each UA operation must be completed within twenty-two (22) minutes flight time or with fifteen (15%) battery power remaining, whichever occurs first. 18. ACP must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under this grant of exemption. This COA will al so require ACP to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than seventy-two (72) hours in advance, but not less than forty- eight (48) hours prior to the operation. 19. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exempt ion must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR par t 47, and have identification ( N-Number ) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable. 20. ACP has developed procedures to document and maintain a record of the UA's maintenance, preventative maintenance, alterations, status of replacement/overhaul component parts, and the total time in service of the
UAs. 21. Each UA operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins. 22. The preflight inspection section in ACP's Confidential Protocols and Controls Exhibit includes the following requirement: The preflight inspection must account for a ll discrepancies, i.e. inoper able components, items, or equipment, not covered in the relevant preflight inspection. 23. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency sp ectrum used for operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements. 24. The documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the pilot at the Ground Control Station, if utilized, of the UA at any time the UA is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. 25. ACP 's UAs must remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations and activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.).
26. ACP 's UA operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR §1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under specia l visual flight rules (SVFR) are
not authorized.
27. ACP 's UAs may not be operated by the pilot from any moving device or vehicle.
28. ACP 's UAs may not be operated less than five-hundred (500) feet below or less than two-thousand (2,000) feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than three (3) statute miles from the pilot.
29. ACP 's UA may not operate in Class B, C, or D airspace without written approval from the FAA. The UA may not operate within five (5) nautical miles of the geographic center of a non-towered airport as denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport's management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the ACP 's COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request. 30. Any incident, accident, or flight ope ration that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UA Integration Office (AFS-80) within

### 14

CAMA Ventures LLC, 7768 Westcroft Dr., Sylvania, OH 43560 Phone: (419) 318-9318 twenty-four (24) hours. Acci dents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.
31. ACP 's UAs, the UA's pilot, and the UA's operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

As mentioned above, the FAA has alread y granted a previous exemption which is essentially identical to the exemption being sought by Andrew Ciesler Photography in this petition for an exemption. Please see FAA Exemption

No. 11138 and 11464.

Therefore, ACP respectfully requests the FAA grant an exemption pursuant to its application as outlined above.

Sincerely,

Aaron M. Miller Manager

CAMA Ventures LLC DBA Andrew Ciesler Photography