Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Notices 11553 

functions. Passengers are invited, 

though not required, to complete and 

return the survey via pre-paid postage, 

which is prefixed to the survey, or 

passengers may submit their responses 

via an online portal. The intercept 

methodology randomly selects 

passengers to complete the survey in an 

effort to gain survey data representative 

of all passenger demographics— 

including passengers who— 

• Travel on weekdays or weekends; 

• Those who travel in the morning, 

mid-day, or evening; 

• Those who pass through each of the 

different security screening locations in 

the airport; 

• Those who are subject to more 

intensive screening of their baggage or 

person; and 

• Those who experience different 

volume conditions and wait times as 

they proceed through the security 

checkpoints. 

The survey includes ten to fifteen 

questions. Each question promotes a 

quality response so that TSA can 

identify areas in need of improvement. 

All questions concern aspects of the 

passenger’s security screening 

experience. 

TSA intends to collect this 

information in order to continue to 

assess customer satisfaction in an effort 

to more efficiently manage airport 

performance. In its future surveys, the 

TSA wishes to obtain more detailed, 

airport-specific data that the TSA can 

use to enhance customer experiences 

and airport performances. In order to 

gain more detailed information 

regarding customer experiences, the 

TSA is submitting eighty-one questions 

to OMB for approval. Twenty-eight of 

the questions have been previously 

approved by OMB and fifty-three 

questions are being submitted to the 

OMB for first-time approval. Each 

survey question seeks to gain 

information regarding one of the 

following categories: 

• Confidence in Personnel 

• Confidence in Screening Equipment 

• Confidence in Security Procedures 

• Convenience of Divesting 

• Experience at Checkpoint 

• Satisfaction with Wait Time 

• Separation from Belongings 

• Separation from Others in Party 

• Stress Level 

TSA personnel select passengers 

using a random method to voluntarily 

participate in the survey until the TSA 

obtains the desired sample size. The 

samples can be selected with one 

randomly selected time and location or 

span multiple times and location. Each 

airport may choose one or more of the 

following sample methods, which 

include a business card that directs 

customers to an online portal, a 

customer satisfaction card with survey 

questions on the card, or a customer 

satisfaction card with survey questions 

on the card and a link to the online 

portal. All responses are voluntary and 

there is no burden on passengers who 

choose not to respond. 

TSA at airports have the capability to 

conduct this survey. We estimate that 

TSA at 25 airports will conduct the 

survey each year. Based on prior survey 

data and research, the TSA assumes a 

maximum volume for the survey would 

be 1,000 surveys per airport. We assume 

the burden on passengers who choose to 

respond to be approximately five 

minutes per respondent. Therefore, 

1,000 surveys × 25 airports = 25,000 

respondents a year, the total burden is 

25,000 × 5 = 125,000 minutes, or 2083.3 

hours per year. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on March 3, 

2010. 

Joanna Johnson, 

TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office 

of Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2010–5176 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–5328–N–03] 

Final Fair Market Rents for the Housing 

Choice Voucher Program and 

Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room 

Occupancy Program for Fiscal Year 

2010; Revised 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice of Final Fair Market 

Rents (FMRs) for Fiscal Year 2010, 

Update. 

SUMMARY: This notice updates the FMRs 

for Reno-Sparks, NV, and Ward County, 

ND, based on Random Digit Dialing 

(RDD) surveys conducted in October 

and November 2009. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

technical information on the 

methodology used to develop FMRs or 

a listing of all FMRs, please call the 

HUD USER information line at (800) 

245–2691 or access the information on 

the HUD Web site, http:// 

www.huduser.org/datasets/fmr.html. 

FMRs are listed at the 40th or 50th 

percentile in Schedule B. For 

informational purposes, a table of 40th 

percentile recent mover rents for those 

areas currently at the 50th percentile 

FMRs will be provided on the same 

website noted above. Any questions 

related to use of FMRs or voucher 

payment standards should be directed 

to the respective local HUD program 

staff. Questions on how to conduct FMR 

surveys or further methodological 

explanations may be addressed to Marie 

L. Lihn or Lynn A. Rodgers, Economic 

and Market Analysis Division, Office of 

Economic Affairs, Office of Policy 

Development and Research, telephone 

(202) 708–0590. Persons with hearing or 

speech impairments may access this 

number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service 

at (800) 877–8339. (Other than the HUD 

USER information line and TTY 

numbers, telephone numbers are not 

toll-free.) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As the 

result of comments submitted in 

response to HUD’s notice of proposed 

Fair Market Rents published on August 

4, 2009 (74 FR 38716), HUD conducted 

Random Digit Dialing (RDD) surveys for 

the following FMR areas: Reno-Sparks, 

NV Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), 

and Ward County, ND. These RDD 

surveys began in October 2009 and were 

completed in November 2009. The RDD 

survey for Reno-Sparks, NV, indicated a 

significant decline in the FMR, while 

there was a significant increase 

indicated by the RDD survey for Ward 

County, ND. Both areas were having 

significant problems administering the 

Housing Choice Voucher program at the 

then current FY2009 FMRs, and 

anticipated continued difficulty under 

the proposed FY2010 FMRs. As a result, 

HUD is revising these FMRs as 

published on September 30, 2009 (74 FR 

50552), effective immediately. 

The FMRs for the two affected areas 

are revised as follows: 

2010 Fair Market Rent Area 

FMR by Number of Bedrooms in Unit 

0 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR 

Reno-Sparks, NV MSA ........................................................ $577 $690 $853 $1,239 $1,498 

Ward County, ND ................................................................. $425 $512 $631 $872 $1,035 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
11554 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Notices 

Dated: March 4, 2010 

Raphael W. Bostic, 

Assistant Secretary for Policy Development 

and Research. 

[FR Doc. 2010–5168 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

Yakima River Basin Conservation 

Advisory Group Charter Renewal; 

Notice of Charter Renewal 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of renewal. 

SUMMARY: This notice is published in 

accordance with section 9(a)(2) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act of 

1972 (Pub. L. 92–463). Following 

consultation with the General Services 

Administration, notice is hereby given 

that the Secretary of the Interior is 

renewing the charter for the Yakima 

River Basin Conservation Advisory 

Group (CAG). The purpose of the CAG 

is to provide recommendations to the 

Secretary of the Interior and the State of 

Washington on the structure and 

implementation of the Yakima River 

Basin Water Conservation Program. In 

consultation with the State, the Yakama 

Nation, Yakima River basin irrigators, 

and other interested and related parties, 

six members are appointed to serve on 

the CAG. 

The basin conservation program is 

structured to provide economic 

incentives with cooperative Federal, 

State, and local funding to stimulate the 

identification and implementation of 

structural and nonstructural costeffective water conservation measures in 

the Yakima River basin. Improvements 

in the efficiency of water delivery and 

use will result in improved streamflows 

for fish and wildlife and improve the 

reliability of water supplies for 

irrigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Dawn Wiedmeier, Deputy Area 

Manager, Yakima River Basin Water 

Enhancement Program, telephone 509– 

575–5848, extension 213. 

Certification 

I hereby certify that Charter renewal 

of the Yakima River Basin Conservation 

Advisory Group is in the public interest 

in connection with the performance of 

duties imposed on the Department of 

the Interior. 

Ken Salazar, 

Secretary of the Interior. 

[FR Doc. 2010–5163 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural 

Items: Museum of Northern Arizona, 

Flagstaff, AZ 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

Notice is here given in accordance 

with the Native American Graves 

Protection and Repatriation Act 

(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent 

to repatriate cultural items in the 

possession of the Museum of Northern 

Arizona, Flagstaff, AZ, that meet the 

definitions of ‘‘sacred objects’’ and 

‘‘objects of cultural patrimony’’ under 25 

U.S.C. 3001. 

This notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations 

in this notice are the sole responsibility 

of the museum, institution, or Federal 

agency that has control of the cultural 

items. The National Park Service is not 

responsible for the determinations in 

this notice. 

In January and September 2000, 

cultural items were gifted to the 

Museum of Northern Arizona by a 

private donor. The cultural items are 

Navajo sandpainting drawings and 

water color/pencil drawings, and are 

divided into three collections. 

The first collection was originally 

collected by an old trading post family 

in the area of Farmington, NM. The 29 

cultural items are 4 watercolors of 

sacred Navajo Yei figures and deities; 22 

water colors and/or pencil drawings 

depicting Navajo ceremonial 

sandpaintings from specific chants; and 

3 pages of hand written notes describing 

the Feather Way and Big Star Way 

ceremonies. 

The second collection, by Ray 

Winnie, Lukachukai, AZ, circa 1920s, 

depicts a sacred Navajo ceremonial 

sandpainting. Mr. Winnie was a Singer 

of the Shooting Way ceremony. The one 

cultural item is a colored pencil 

drawing on brown paper. 

The third collection, by Ray Winnie, 

Lukachukai, AZ, circa 1920s, depicts 

sacred Navajo ceremonial 

sandpaintings. Mr. Winnie was a Singer 

of the Shooting Way ceremony. The six 

cultural items consist of one notebook 

with pencil and crayon drawings, four 

color pencil drawings, and one muslin 

watercolor depicting Navajo 

ceremonies. 

A traditional practitioner of Navajo 

religious ceremonies determined the 

images presented were of sacred esoteric 

knowledge with specific ceremonial 

properties that continue to be used by 

traditional Navajo religious 

practitioners. Based on the sacred 

esoteric knowledge of the images, the 

paintings could not have been obtained 

voluntarily nor could they have been 

alienated by a single individual, and 

instead belong to the tribe as a whole. 

Officials of the Museum of Northern 

Arizona have determined that, pursuant 

to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(C), the 36 cultural 

items described above are specific 

ceremonial objects needed by traditional 

Native American religious leaders for 

the practice of traditional Native 

American religions by their present-day 

adherents. Officials of the Museum of 

Northern Arizona also have determined 

that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (3)(D), 

the 36 cultural items described above 

have ongoing historical, traditional, or 

cultural importance central to the 

Native American group or culture itself, 

rather than property owned by an 

individual. Lastly, officials of the 

Museum of Northern Arizona have 

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 

3001 (2), there is a relationship of 

shared group identity that can be 

reasonably traced between the sacred 

objects/objects of cultural patrimony 

and the Navajo Nation, Arizona, New 

Mexico & Utah. 

Representatives of any other Indian 

tribe that believes itself to be culturally 

affiliated with the sacred objects/objects 

of cultural patrimony should contact 

Elaine Hughes, NAGPRA Contact, 

Museum of Northern Arizona, 3101 N. 

Ft. Valley Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86004, 

telephone (928) 774–5211, ext. 270, 

before April 12, 2010. Repatriation of 

the sacred objects/objects of cultural 

patrimony to the Navajo Nation, 

Arizona, New Mexico & Utah may 

proceed after that date if no additional 

claimants come forward. 

The Museum of Northern Arizona is 

responsible for notifying the Navajo 

Nation, Arizona, New Mexico & Utah 

that this notice has been published. 

Dated: December 10, 2010 

Richard C. Waldbauer, 

Acting Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2010–5167 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–50–S 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES