alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 33 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                         Calendar No. 1

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               S. RES. 33

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

To amend Senate Resolution 338 (which establishes the Select Committee 
   on Ethics) to change the membership of the select committee from 
               members of the Senate to private citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

             January 26 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

                  Ordered to be placed on the Calendar

                                                         Calendar No. 1
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 33

To amend Senate Resolution 338 (which establishes the Select Committee 
   on Ethics) to change the membership of the select committee from 
               members of the Senate to private citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

 Mr. Helms submitted the following resolution; which was ordered to be 
                         placed on the Calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To amend Senate Resolution 338 (which establishes the Select Committee 
   on Ethics) to change the membership of the select committee from 
               members of the Senate to private citizens.

    Resolved, That (a) subsection (a) of the first section of Senate 
Resolution 338, agreed to July 23, 1964 (88th Congress, 2d session), is 
amended to read as follows: ``(a)(1) there is hereby established a 
permanent select committee of the Senate to be known as the Select 
Committee on Ethics (referred to in this resolution as the `Select 
Committee') consisting of 6 members all of whom shall be private 
citizens. Three members of the Select Committee shall be selected by 
the Majority Leader and 3 shall be selected by the Minority Leader. 
Each member of the Select Committee shall serve 6 years except that the 
Majority Leader and the Minority Leader when making their initial 
appointments shall each designate 1 member to serve only 2 years and 1 
member to serve only 4 years. At least 2 members of the Select 
Committee shall be retired Federal judges, and at least 2 members of 
the Select Committee shall be former members of the Senate. Members of 
the Select Committee may be reappointed.
    ``(2) The Select Committee shall select a chairman and a vice 
chairman from among its members.
    ``(3) Members of the Select Committee shall serve without 
compensation but shall be entitled to travel and per diem expenses in 
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Senate.''.
    (b) Subsection (e) of the first section of Senate Resolution 338 
(as referred to in subsection (a)) is repealed.
```
§ 1.912-1 Exclusion of certain cost-of-living allowances. ( a ) Amounts received by Government civilian personnel stationed outside the continental United States as cost-of-living allowances in accordance with regulations approved by the President are, by the provisions of section 912(1), excluded from gross income. Such allowances shall be considered as retaining their characteristics under section 912(1) notwithstanding any combination thereof with any other allowance. For example, the cost-of-living portion of a “living and quarters allowance” would be excluded from gross income whether or not any other portion of such allowance is excluded from gross income.
( b ) For purposes of section 912(1), the term “continental United States” includes only the 48 States existing on February 25, 1944 (the date of the enactment of the Revenue Act of 1943 (58 Stat. 21)) and the District of Columbia.
# C_2016296EN.01001002.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék — Hungary) — proceedings against István Balogh

(Case C-25/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Right to interpretation and translation - Directive 2010/64/EU - Scope - Definition of criminal proceedings - Procedure laid down by a Member State for the recognition of a decision in criminal proceedings handed down by a court in another Member State and for the entry in the criminal record of the conviction handed down by that court - Costs in connection with the translation of that decision - Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA - Decision 2009/316/JHA))

(2016/C 296/14)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Budapest Környéki Törvényszék

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

István Balogh

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) of Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that that directive is not applicable to a national special procedure for the recognition by the court of a Member State of a final judicial decision handed down by a court of another Member State convicting a person for the commission of an offence.

Council Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA of 26 February 2009 on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record between Member States and Council Decision 2009/316/JHA of 6 April 2009 on the establishment of the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) in application of Article 11 of Framework Decision 2009/315 must be interpreted as precluding the implementation of national legislation establishing such a special procedure.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.

1

---
Amendment No. 2, effective January 1, 2007



 Exhibit 10.22 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE 
 UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT 
 PLAN FOR SENIOR MANAGERS 
 EFFECTIVE
JANUARY 1, 2007 
 The International Paper Company Unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan for Senior Managers shall be amended in the following respect,
effective January 1, 2007: 
 Section 3 shall be amended by adding the following new language at the end of the first sentence thereof: 

“, unless participation in either the Retirement Plan or the Salaried Savings Plan is prohibited based on United States citizenship or residency
requirements of such plans, in which case this requirement (C) shall be waived.”
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2015-CCRE27Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer, BerkeleyPoint Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, as Primary Servicer, KeyBankNational Association, as Primary Servicer for the 11 Madison Avenue MortgageLoan, KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer for the 11 MadisonAvenue Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee forthe 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, and Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 18, 2020

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDual Ion Spectrometers and Their Calibration for the Fast Plasma Investigation on NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale MissionThe scientific target of NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission is to study the fundamentally important phenomenon of magnetic reconnection. Theoretical models of this process predict a small size, on the order of hundred kilometers, for the ion diffusion region where ions are demagnetized at the dayside magnetopause. This region may typically sweep over the spacecraft at relatively high speeds of 50 km/s, requiring the fast plasma investigation (FPI) instrument suite to have an extremely high time resolution for measurements of the 3D particle distribution functions. As part of the FPI on MMS, the 16 dual ion spectrometers (DIS) will provide fast (150 ms) 3D ion velocity distributions, from 10 to 30,000 eV/q, by combining the measurements from four dual spectrometers on each of four MMS spacecraft. For any multispacecraft mission, the response uniformity among the spectrometer set assumes an enhanced importance. Due to these demanding instrument requirements and the effort of calibrating more than 32 sensors (16 × 2) within a tight schedule, a highly systematic and precise calibration was required for measurement repeatability. To illustrate how this challenge was met, a brief overview of the FPI DIS was presented with a detailed discussion of the calibration method of approach and implementation. Finally, a discussion of DIS performance results, their unit-to-unit variation, and the lessons learned from this calibration effort are presented.Document ID20170005532Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsCoffey, V. N.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Chandler, M. O.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 13, 2017Publication DateApril 1, 2017Subject CategorySpace Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2017-218237M-1429Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 943396.05.03.02.08.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005532.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 133 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 133

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 133

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the calendar day of Tuesday, January 9, 
1996, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 22, 1996, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on the calendar 
day of Wednesday, January 10, 1996, pursuant to a motion offered by the 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon on Monday, January 22, 1996, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 9 (legislative 
      day, January 5), 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. ISAURO MORAN-GUILLERMO, a.k.a. Isauro Moran-Guilermo, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-10512D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00833-CKJHCE-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Mark W. Bennett, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 22, 2014 ** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. Isauro Moran-Guillermo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction a nd 46-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 

# FILED
JUL 10 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S. 738 (1967), Moran-Guillermo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Moran-Guillermo the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Moran-Guillermo has waived his right to appeal his reentry of a removed alien conviction and 46-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the app eal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED.

2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Zacchaeus Archie v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-21-00282-CR

Trial court case number: 1683895

Trial court: 174th District Court of Harris County

On May 23, 2022, Appellant Zacchaeus Archie filed a third motion for extension of time 

to file his brief, requesting an extension until July 5, 2022.

Appellant’s brief originally was due on August 27, 2021. On August 30, 2021, 

Appellant’s counsel requested a 49-day extension of time in which to file Appellant’s brief “due 

to the length of the record and the complexity of the issues.” The Court granted the motion 

extending the deadline to file Appellant’s brief to October 15, 2021.

On October 18, 2021, Appellant filed a second motion for extension of time to file his 

brief, asking for a 35-day extension “due to the length of the record and the complexity of the 

issues.” Appellant’s counsel noted in the motion that he had prepared two petitions for 

discretionary review and two letter briefs in the preceding thirty days. The Court granted the 

second motion extending the deadline to file Appellant’s brief to November 19, 2021 “with no 

further extensions” to be granted.

In his third motion for extension of time, filed May 23, 2022, Appellant now requests a 

43-day extension of time to file his appellate brief. In the motion, Appellant’s counsel states that 

“[f]or some reason, this case was not calendared” and “fell off the radar.” He requests Appellant 

be given until July 5, 2022 to file his brief.

Appellant’s motion for third extension of time is granted. Given the various extensions 

that have been granted and that 312 days will have expired since the brief was originally 

due, no further extensions will be granted. If Appellant’s brief is not filed by July 5, 2022, the 

case will be abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine (a) whether 

Appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; (b) whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the 

appeal; (c) the reason for the failure to file a brief; and (d) if the Appellant desires to continue the 

appeal, a date certain when Appellant’s brief will be filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually 

Date: June 2, 2022
EX-10.36





	




Exhibit 10.36  



Dear Carter: 



We are pleased to extend you an offer
to join IMPATH Inc. (“IMPATH” or the “Company”) as Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer. You will be paid a base salary of $500,000 per year.
Your annual bonus, if any, will be as determined in the sole discretion of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. In addition, you will be granted options
to purchase shares of common stock of the Company, to be issued under and in accordance
with the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan(s), at such times and in such amounts as
shall be determined by the Compensation Committee. Such determination shall include your
eligibility for any future option grants. 



Your date of hire will be February
11, 2003. You will be an exempt employee as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act and
will report directly to the Board of Directors of the Company. You shall devote such time,
attention, knowledge, energy and skills, during normal working hours, and at such other
times, as your duties may reasonably require, in connection with your employment. You
shall serve the Company faithfully, conscientiously and to the best of your ability and
shall promote the interests and reputation of the Company. 



This letter does not constitute a
guarantee of employment and your employment will continue to be “at-will” such
that either party can terminate the employment relationship with or without cause (as
defined below), and at any time. 



This letter constitutes the entire
understanding between you and IMPATH regarding your employment and may not be modified
except in writing signed by you and the Company. 



We are extremely pleased at the
prospect of your employment at IMPATH as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
and we look forward to working with you in that capacity. If you have any questions, feel
free to call me. 



Sincerely, 



The Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors: 



        George
S. Frazza
        Marcel Rozencweig, M.D. 



By: / Richard C. Rosenzweig
       ——————————————

       Richard C. Rosenzweig 
       Secretary and General Counsel








		 



/s/ Carter H. Eckert
——————————————

Carter H. Eckert 






	


5
#### John H. Cassidy, Jr., Executor (Estate of John H. Cassidy) *v.*Board of Tax Review of the City of Waterbury

*J. Warren TJpson,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Harry F. Spellman,*corporation counsel, for the appellee (defendant).

Argued December 3

decided December 17, 1963

The parties have stipulated that the case he remanded to the Court of Common Pleas in the judicial district of Waterbury for further proceedings according to law. Accordingly, it is so ordered.
IB-)0- £01$ a
•sr • :* .•••-•• '

** r CoA A/o. OST-13 -OIL87'^ OK 

### Thy na<r»^_ /s -A(\»v^er ^-g-^-h^y rAxw^Kvx



### n^^h (2&*s you -h&H ^*<l ^^y /viy 7f^ K,

UJo<S r-g 'Pusg^X . (Z~aL>r\ JT Amv/<g. <a_ /r^w t>w&-\-los\

/*ee$L -ho do . ^Ig^cLccS-g. jT i>roke /?o /^<v Co'/w/fc^*-** or d>s\£-l/seJL, TMe^JiL i^v-es, sA.0u<.l<K 

### have, beea ol ujcltro</\^ 'Per r^y a/resf: JT 

### sAquU no^ haL\A£. be*/\ *?<*+ o-y\ <x. pro^&^^Z. Orote-T,' - :_ '



### ; TAt_ ~HocM^>c<\{ fo/fc^ *teft gl^JI rtocJz[Aj<x.l(. O&CjcL^r S-ho^rz-cL 0r\ -Hjl SJ-^^d ancles' oc^PL
CQUKTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS OCT 19 2015

### A$<2- P^

^y^ ytyrlS-e*^. d<QCJZyO\' JT //V-e Q~>{\4\ //i A 

### /w,'\<l o£ -hhr-e.4- Sokoo^f e,\e.r~4-Pry ^lA/e.

T<PyoiA -J-&U ZSrO -ho STd<Q -g/pl-T -h> c^U 7^6.

p(S//^e &\/Zry -P'rrs^ 4Az.y see. &- s-hr^ex^oz-r„ 

### •/-/£ pol/C-e. o*pP/<^£r j^jKo -Pg-as- vnu^vpg/^-eA -/•#-€. fl/rU, X u/^r \VS'^ -PAeir -h^rn^-p, JT /nq^tg /h? -hhr^F &P any (<L?/\Jl, /[aJC JZH <k/ts rio"f g^ 

### ^Are^k -ft? ^yg/i^r S-AsQ-Py*



### Know -hte Cj>ur-\~ ^rror-eA -tA*y Sc^ld +A-ey olfd, fie*<><L r&C0r\ilcl4r ^x T.D.&. so ^y Col^^ <^Lia b(L Ki/^-eA TP/^oSjz. Aelje sPvy vukjcf j*-o do*£• ha«/-c jCno^j ^/i-e .h'fr-z- ^° he \)P m-e. /hgy\\^ you 

## f>s: rto+hAPor^*s\P>°y\ oP j^vrnJi* 4~/>^e * dlyx