alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 98 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 98

 To refer S. 794 entitled, ``A bill for the relief of land grantors in 
Henderson, Union, and Webster counties, Kentucky, and their heirs'', to 
the Chief Judge of the United States Claims Court for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 1993

Mr. Ford submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                Reported by Mr. Biden, without amendment

           September 21 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To refer S. 794 entitled, ``A bill for the relief of land grantors in 
Henderson, Union, and Webster counties, Kentucky, and their heirs'', to 
the Chief Judge of the United States Claims Court for a report thereon.

    Resolved, That the bill (S. 794) entitled ``A bill for the relief 
of land grantors in Henderson, Union, and Webster Counties, Kentucky, 
and their heirs'', now pending in the Senate, together with all 
accompanying papers, is referred to the Chief Judge of the United 
States Court of Claims. The Chief Judge shall proceed with the same in 
accordance with the provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, 
United States Code, and report back to the Senate, at the earliest 
practicable date, giving such findings of fact and conclusions that are 
sufficient to inform Congress of the amount, if any, legally or 
equitably due from the United States to the claimants individually.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 17 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 17

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 27 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any constitutional 
                 amendment requiring a balanced budget.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, for the purposes of any constitutional amendment requiring a 
balanced budget, the appropriate committees of the House and the Senate 
shall report to their respective Houses implementing legislation to 
achieve a balanced budget without increasing the receipts or reducing 
the disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 
Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund to achieve that 
goal.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 25, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 582.6807 Sodium thiosulfate. ( a ) *Product.* Sodium thiosulfate.
( b ) *Tolerance.* 0.1 percent.
( c ) *Limitations, restrictions, or explanation.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in salt in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 141 (Monday, July 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 43135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17894]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket DOT-OST-2010-0263]

Application of City Wings, Inc. D/B/A Seaflight for Commuter 
Authority

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2012-7-22).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding City 
Wings, Inc. d/b/a Seaflight fit, willing, and able, and awarding it 
Commuter Air Carrier Authorization.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
July 31, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2010-0263 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, 
and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the 
order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room W86-465), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-7785.

    Dated: July 17, 2012.
Susan L. Kurland,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-17894 Filed 7-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
956

957

962

961

960

524 964

970

969

968

967

966

965

959

958

955

503 504

506

505 519

507

512

513

547

515

603

672

602

604

690

606

607

608

605

609 612

610

556

543

548

523

552

551

550

555

517

516

509

554

526

553

521

527

528

972

529

530

531

557

558 534

561

562

563

560

535 616

564

565

567

566

569

574

575

576

572

577

578

579

580

731

701

704

705 711

710

713

715

721

714

716

717 722

720

624

622

623

620

619

677

678

666

682

665

667

638

642

656

650

649

657

815

658

659

816

814 799

864 804

808

803

806 807

811

812

805

865

866

846

879

817

818

820

828

825

830

833 834

874

875

835 836

837

723

725

724

728

733

736

848

849

850

852

854

856

855

827

6265

6270

6267

6299

6259

6276

6263

5006 0

500 55

50022

627 7

50050

6273

6296

5002 4

50040

50052

50002

6 27 5

50 054

5 0051

62 55

50001

6271

6250

50033

50016

50003

50005

50035

6262

Even-aged 0% Retention

Even-aged 15% Retention

Uneven-aged 33% Removal

Project Area Boundary

Non-National Forest

Young Growth

Lakes

500ft Contour

Proposed NFS Road

Proposed Temporary Road

Reconditioned Road

Open Roads

Closed Roads

Decomissioned Road

Class I Stream

Alternative 2 - Proposed Action/Max Timber Supply

Wrangell Island Project DEIS

0 0.5 1 2 3 4

Miles

 ̄ Document Path: \\ds.fs.fed.us\efs\FS\NFS\Tongass\Project\WRD\WrangellIslandEIS\GIS\MapProducts\DEIS\DocumentMaps\Ch2\Alternative_2.mxd
Filed: April 29, 2003

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1217

(CA-02-112-5-BO)

Victor Byrd,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

North Carolina State University, etc.,

Defendant - Appellee.

O R D E R

The court amends its opinion filed April 22, 2003, as follows:

On the cover sheet, section 7, line 1 -- counsel’s name is

corrected to read “Celia Grasty Lata.”

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor 

 Clerk 
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1217

VICTOR BYRD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, University

Temporary Services,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-112-5-BO)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Grasty Lata, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Victor Byrd appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

civil action alleging employment discrimination under the Americans

with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Byrd v. North Carolina State Univ., No. CA02-112-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, the undersigned officer of Sky Financial Group, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin T. Thompson                               
|Kevin T. Thompson                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|October 27, 2006                                    

The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
39768.

#### JONES v. ALEXANDER.

Decided October 11, 1962.

*John T. Perren,*for plaintiff in error.

*Marson G. Dunaway,*contra.

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

This is a trover case. The judge charged the jury that if they believed the plaintiff was entitled to recover they should find the value of the property sued for, since the plaintiff had so elected, and it would then be their duty to fix the amount of the interest; that the legal rate of interest is 7 percent and he would be entitled to interest at that rate from the date he was wrongfully deprived of his property, but that they need not figure the interest since it is a matter of calculation. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for $920.52 as the value of the automobile sued for, plus $41 as the value of personal belongings sued for, plus 7 percent interest. The judge entered a judgment for $1,180.24, plus costs. The assignment of error in this court is to the overruling of the special ground of the motion for new trial complaining of the charge which authorized the jury to find interest as a separate item, and on the third general ground of the motion contending that the verdict is contrary to the law because it contains a separate finding of interest. Both of these assignments are meritorious. *Beaver v. Magid,*56 Ga. App. 272, 285 (192 SE 497); *Adams v. Webb,*72 Ga. App. 66, 67 (3) (32 SE2d 922). Accordingly, the verdict and the judgment entered thereon as written cannot stand, but since the error complained of went solely to the question of interest, and since, by calculation, it appears that the court awarded interest in its judgment in the amount of $218.72, the judgment will be affirmed on condition that that amount be written off therefrom; otherwise, the judgment shall stand reversed.

*Judgment affirmed on condition.*

*Eberhardt and Russell, JJ., concur.*
(logo)Newmark Knight Frank

 

 

225Franklin Street 

18thFloor

Boston,MA 02110

T877.526.3562

ngkf.com

 

 

**Officer'sCertificate**

 

 

Pursuantto the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listedon Schedule I hereto, for which Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark Knight Frank, as Primary Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino,a Senior Managing Director of Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark KnightFrank, hereby certifies subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto,as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in hisindividual capacity, as follows:

 

1.A review of the activities of the Primary Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the "Reporting Period") and of its performance underthe Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Primary Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 31stday of January, 2019.

 

BerkeleyPoint Capital LLC d/b/a

NewmarkKnight Frank

/s/Ronald Steffenino

RonaldSteffenino

SeniorManaging Director,

Servicingand Asset Management

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a NewmarkKnight Frank as ***Primary Servicer***:

 

COMM2014-CCRE 17        COMM 2014-CCRE19 

COMM2014-GC24             COMM 2014-UBS4 

COMM2015-CCRE23         COMM 2015 CCRE27 

COMM2015-GC30             GSCCRE 2015-HULA 

COMM2015-LC19              COMM 2015-LC21

CGCMT2016-C3                CFCRE 2016-C7

CCRESG2016 HEAT          CCUBS 2017-C1

CGCMT2017-C4                UBS 2017-C5 

BMARK2018 B3                MSCI 2018 L1

UBS2018 C12                    UBS 2018 C14

UBS2018 C8                      UBS 2018 C9

MSCI2018 H4
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 180

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the members of the Armed Forces and civilian

personnel of the Government who served the United

States faithfully during the Cold War.

Whereas, during the period of the Cold War, from the end

of World War II until the collapse of the Soviet Union

in 1991, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged

in a global military rivalry;

Whereas this rivalry, potentially the most dangerous military

confrontation in the history of mankind, has come to a

close without a direct superpower military conflict;
2

HCON 180 RDS

Whereas military and civilian personnel of the Department of

Defense, personnel in the intelligence community, members of the foreign service, and other officers and employees of the United States faithfully performed their duties

during the Cold War;

Whereas many such personnel performed their duties while

isolated from family and friends and served overseas

under frequently arduous conditions in order to protect

the United States and achieve a lasting peace; and

Whereas the discipline and dedication of those personnel were

fundamental to the prevention of a superpower military

conflict: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),That Congress hereby commends, and ex3 presses it gratitude and appreciation for, the service and

4 sacrifices of the members of the Armed Forces and civilian

5 personnel of the Government who contributed to the his6 toric victory in the Cold War.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 4.2

                                January 14, 2002

ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS                           OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

        NUMBER                                             INTEREST(S)

                            ECONOMIC INTEREST ONLY

                       Performance Capital Management, LLC

                      The Operating Agreement of the company
                        contains restrictions on transfer.


                       Performance Capital Management, LLC


This Certifies that _______________________________________________is the
Registered holder of _________________ Membership Interest(s) of the above named
Company, transferable only on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in
person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed and
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Articles of Organization and
the Operating Agreement of the Company, as amended to the date of transfer,
copies of which may be inspected and copied during normal business hours at the
principal office of the Company.

     In Witness Whereof, the said Company has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized Manager(s) or Officer(s) and its Seal to be
hereunto affixed

this _______________ day                    of ______________ A.D. ____

_______________________                    _________________________



<PAGE>

     For Value Received, ____________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto ________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________Membership
Interests represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint
_______________________________________________________________Attorney
to transfer the said Membership Interests on the books of the within named
Company with full power of substitution in the premises.
     Dated _________________     ________

          In presence of               NOTICE:  THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT
______________________________   MUST  CORRESPOND  WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON
                                 THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR
______________________________   WITHOUT  ALTERATION  OR  ENLARGEMENT,  OR  ANY
                                 CHANGE WHATEVER.



<PAGE>
§ 1.6074-3 Extension of time for filing declarations by corporations. ( a ) *In general.* District directors and directors of service centers are authorized to grant a reasonable extension of time for filing a declaration or an amended declaration. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of § 301.6091-1 (relating to hand-carried documents), an application by a corporation for an extension of time for filing such a declaration shall be addressed to the internal revenue officer with whom the corporation is required to file its declaration and must contain a full recital of the causes for the delay.
( b ) *Addition to tax applicable.* An extension of time granted to a corporation for filing a declaration of estimated tax automatically extends the time for paying the estimated tax (without interest) for the same period. However, such extension does not relieve the corporation from the addition to the tax imposed by section 6655, and the period of the underpayment will be determined under section 6655(c) without regard to such extension.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12108, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6950, 33 FR 5355, Apr. 4, 1968]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2321

_____________________________

EARL RAYMOND CAMPOS,

Appellant,

v.

JOANA CAMPOS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

J. Lee Marsh, Judge.

March 26, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Emilian “Ian” Bucataru of Bucataru Law Firm PLLC, Tallahassee, 

for Appellant.

Jerry L. Rumph, Jr. and Jennifer L. Sweeting of Sweeting & 

Rumph, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 1.817A-1 Certain modified guaranteed contracts. ( a ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *Modified guaranteed contract.* The term *modified guaranteed contract* (MGC) is defined in section 817A(d) as an annuity, life insurance, or pension plan contract (other than a variable contract described in section 817) under which all or parts of the amounts received under the contract are allocated to a segregated account. Assets and reserves in this segregated account must be valued from time to time with reference to market values for annual statement purposes. Further, an MGC must provide either for a net surrender value or for a policyholder's fund (as defined in section 807(e)(1)). If only a portion of a contract is not described in section 817, such portion is treated as a separate contract for purposes of applying section 817A.
( 2 ) *Temporary guarantee period.* An MGC may temporarily guarantee a return other than the permanently guaranteed crediting rate for a period specified in the contract (the *temporary guarantee period*). During the temporary guarantee period, the amount paid to the policyholder upon surrender is usually increased or decreased by a market value adjustment, which is determined by a formula set forth under the terms of the MGC.
( 3 ) *Equity-indexed modified guaranteed contract.* An equity-indexed MGC is an MGC, as defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, that provides a return during or at the end of the temporary guarantee period based on the performance of stocks, other equity instruments, or equity-based derivatives.
( 4 ) *Non-equity-indexed modified guaranteed contract.* A non-equity-indexed MGC is an MGC, as defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, that provides a return during or at the end of the temporary guarantee period not based on the performance of stocks, other equity instruments, or equity-based derivatives.
( b ) *Waiver of section 811(d) for certain non-equity-indexed modified guaranteed contracts.* Section 811(d) is waived during the temporary guarantee period when applied to non-equity-indexed MGCs.
( c ) *Applicability dates.* Paragraph (b) of this section applies to taxable years beginning after *October 13, 2020.* However, a taxpayer may choose to apply the rules of paragraph (b) of this section for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, the effective date of the revision of section 807 by Public Law 115-97, and on or before *October 13, 2020,* provided the taxpayer consistently applies the rules of paragraph (b) of this section to that taxable year and all subsequent taxable years. *See* section 7805(b)(7). For taxable years beginning on or before *October 13, 2020, see* paragraph (b) of this section as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 2020.
[T.D. 9058, 68 FR 24350, May 7, 2003, as amended by T.D. 9911, 85 FR 64394, Oct. 13, 2020]