alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certification**I, Michael L. Middleton, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tri–County FinancialCorporation, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tri–County FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e) and15d15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board or directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 13, 2006       /s/ Michael L. Middleton Michael L. Middleton    President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DoD-2009-HA-0013]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 2, 2009.
    Title and OMB Number: Public Perceptions of Military Health Care 
System; OMB Control Number 0720-0038.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 1,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 8 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 133.
    Needs and Uses: The goal of this survey effort is to determine the 
public's perceptions of Military Health Care and compare and contrast 
that with their perceptions of U.S. Health Care.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: July 24, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-18402 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
H. Con. Res. 172 Agreed to June 12, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Authorizing the 1996 Summer Olympic Torch Relay to be run through the Capitol

Grounds, and for other purposes.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF 1996 SUMMER OLYMPIC

TORCH RELAY THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

On June 20, 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of

the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of

the Senate may jointly designate, the 1996 Summer Olympic Torch

Relay may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of the

ceremony of the Centennial Olympic Games to be held in Atlanta,

Georgia.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized by section 1 shall be

free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by

the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board. The

sponsor of the event shall assume full responsibility for all expenses

and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

(b) PROHIBITION ON DISPLAY OF ADVERTISEMENTS.—The

Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board shall take

such actions as may be necessary to prohibit the display of

advertisements for commercial products or services during the

event. Such actions shall include measures to ensure that

advertisements are not displayed on any vehicle accompanying runners in the Torch Relay.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

For the purposes of this resolution, the sponsor of the event

authorized by section 1 may erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject

to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such structures

and equipment as are necessary for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board

are authorized to make any additional arrangement that may be

required to carry out the event authorized by section 1.
H. Con. Res. 172—2

SEC. 5. LIMITATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS.

A commercial sponsor of the 1996 Summer Olympic Torch

Relay may not represent, either directly or indirectly, that this

resolution or any activity carried out under this resolution in any

way constitutes approval or endorsement by the Federal Government of the commercial sponsor or any product or service offered

by the commercial sponsor.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
§ 1.6655-6 Methods of accounting. ( a ) *In general.* In computing any required installment, a corporation must use the methods of accounting used in computing taxable income for the taxable year for which estimated tax is being determined (the current taxable year).
( b ) *Accounting method changes.* A taxpayer that changes its method of accounting with the consent of the Commissioner for the current taxable year must use the new method of accounting (as of the beginning of the taxable year) in the determination of taxable income for annualization periods ending on or after the date the related section 481(a) adjustment is treated as arising. See § 1.6655-2(f)(3)(ii)(C) for the date a section 481(a) adjustment is treated as arising. If the change in method of accounting does not result in a section 481(a) adjustment, the taxpayer may choose to use the new method of accounting (as of the beginning of the taxable year) in the determination of taxable income for all annualization periods during the year of change or only those annualization periods ending on or after the date the Form 3115 “Application for Change in Accounting Method” was filed with the national office of the Internal Revenue Service. This paragraph (b) only applies to the extent a taxpayer changes a method of accounting for the taxable year with the consent of the Commissioner. Therefore, a taxpayer may be subject to a section 6655 addition to tax for an underpayment of estimated tax if an underpayment results from a change in a method of accounting the taxpayer anticipates making for the taxable year but for which the consent of the Commissioner is not subsequently received.
( c ) *Example.* The following example illustrates the rules of this section: ( 1 ) *Example.* Change of accounting method. Corporation ABC, a calendar year taxpayer, uses an accrual method of accounting and the annualization method under section 6655(e)(2)(A)(i) to calculate all of its 2008 required installments. On June 15, 2008, ABC files a Form 3115 requesting permission to change its method of accounting for future litigation reserves for the tax year ending December 31, 2008. On February 15, 2009, ABC receives consent from the Commissioner to make the change for the tax year ending December 31, 2008. The change results in a positive section 481(a) adjustment of $100,000. Under the provisions of § 1.6655-2(f)(3)(ii) ABC chooses to treat the section 481(a) adjustment as arising on the date the Form 3115 is filed with the national office of the Internal Revenue Service. Therefore, ABC is required to use the new method of accounting (as of the beginning of the year) in the determination of taxable income for annualization periods ending on or after June 15, 2008.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to taxable years beginning after September 6, 2007.
[T.D. 9347, 72 FR 44361, Aug. 7, 2007, as amended by T.D. 9870, 84 FR 33692, July 15, 2019]
1 The Honorable Brian S. M iller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2990

___________ David E. Jones, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Geoffrey Bullard, Corporal, Faulkner * County Sheriff’s Office; Karl Byrd, * [UNPUBLISHED] Sheriff, Faulkner County Sheriff’s * Office, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 5, 2009 Filed: May 11, 2009

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. David Jones appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for injunctive relief in his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We c onclude that the district court did not clearly err in its factual determinations , err on the law, or abuse its discretion in-2- denying Jones’s motion for a preliminary injunction. See United Indus. Corp. v. Clorox Co. , 140 F.3d 1175, 1178-79 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 35.7

LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling
and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an
authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida limited liability
companyBy: /s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident


Dated: February 22, 2017





1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700
 Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

CGCMT 2015-P1

Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-P1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1

Citibank,N.A.,

Cirino Emanuele

Citibank,N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street,

14th Floor New York NY 10013

John Hannon

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich Street, 5th Floor

New York NY 10013

Paul Vanderslice

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich Street, 19th Floor

New York NY 10013

Richard Simpson

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich Street, 17th Floor

New York NY 10013

Ryan M. OConnor

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

Trust & Agency
Services

1761 E. Saint Andrew Place

Santa Ana CA 92705

Amy McNulty

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor

Att: {pool name} - Surveillance
Manager

New York NY 10016

David Rodgers

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor

Att: {Pool Name}

New York NY 10016

Group
<Page>



                                                    [LOGO]

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-43799) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 7, 2003
AMENDMENT NO



AMENDMENT NO.  2 TO THE

2003 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN





The Alpharma Inc. 2003 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of October 1, 2006, as follows:



1.Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph after the second paragraph thereof:
"Notwithstanding anything in this Section 4.2 of the Plan that may suggest otherwise, if one of the events described in the first paragraph hereof is determined by the Committee to be an equity restructuring under FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Shareholder Based Payment, then the Committee shall make such adjustments to the terms of existing Awards as are necessary to prevent dilution of such Awards."









2.Section 17.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following immediately after the first sentence thereof:
"Notwithstanding the foregoing, if as a result of an unusual or nonrecurring event (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.2 hereof), which event is determined by the Committee to be an equity restructuring under FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Shareholder Based Payment, then the terms and conditions of the Awards shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee in order to prevent dilution of the benefit or potential benefits intended to be available under the Plan."
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Corporate
                                                       Trust Services
                                                       MAC R1204-010
                                                       9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       Tel: 410 884 2000
                                                       Fax: 410 715 2380
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Re: 	     Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities
Trust 2015-C31, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C31



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the
“Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (“Wells
Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):



(a)
A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under such officer’s supervision; and



(b)To the best of
such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in
all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.





February 27, 2017



|/s/
    BRIAN SMITH | 
|------------------- | 
|BRIAN
    SMITH     | 
|Vice
    President  | 



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together
    we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | -------------------------
AMENDMENT TO THE



AMENDMENT TO THE

ALPHARMA INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR OPTION PLAN 




The Alpharma Inc. Non-Employee Director Option Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of June 22, 2006, as follows:



1.     Section 13 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof:
"Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors has delegated to the executive management Benefits Committee the authority to adopt administrative amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not involve a change in the costs or liability of the Company or alter the benefits payable thereunder.  The Board of Directors has delegated to the Compensation Committee the authority to adopt all other amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or  are  required  to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or the regulations thereunder.  The Board of Directors retains the authority to adopt amendments to the Plan that significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or are required to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or regulations thereunder."







***

	
/s/ George P. Rose
	
October 23, 2006

	
     ALPHARMA INC.
	
 DATE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 93 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 93

 To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the 
name of the Senate in United States ex rel. Taxpayers Against Fraud, et 
                    al. v. General Electric Company.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 2 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

 Mr. Mitchell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the 
name of the Senate in United States ex rel. Taxpayers Against Fraud, et 
                    al. v. General Electric Company.

Whereas, in the case of United States ex rel. Taxpayers Against Fraud, et al. v. 
        General Electric Company, Nos. 92-4283 and 93-3015, pending in the 
        United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the 
        constitutionality of the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, as 
        amended by the False Claims Amendments Act of 1986, Public Law No. 99-
        562, 100 Stat. 3153 (1986), 31 U.S.C. 3729, et seq. (1988), have been 
        placed in issue;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(c), 706(a), and 713(a) of the Ethics in 
        Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(c), 288e(a), and 288l(a) (1988), 
        the Senate may direct its counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the name 
        of the Senate in any legal action in which the powers and 
        responsibilities of Congress under the Constitution are placed in issue: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to appear as 
amicus curiae on behalf of the Senate in the case of United States ex 
rel. Taxpayers Against Fraud, et al. v. General Electric Company to 
defend the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions of the False 
Claims Act.

                                 <all>
```