alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Geology of Green River Formation and associated Eocene rocks in southwestern Wyoming and adjacent parts of Colorado and Utah

By: W. H. Bradley

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp496A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (15524 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (11280 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (3891 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (1501 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Order entered January 23, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00920-CV

RODRICK SAMPLES, Appellant

V.

THE DALLAS COUNTY SPECIAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC12-11245

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ January 21, 2015 second motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellees shall file their brief by FEBRUARY 23, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 183

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the action taken by the Government

of France against United States seafood products is a totally unwarranted action that is having severe repercussions on United States seafood producers and, in general, the United States fishing industry.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 28 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. PELL, Mr.

MITCHELL, Mr. COHEN, and Mr. MURKOWSKI) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the action taken

by the Government of France against United States seafood products is a totally unwarranted action that is

having severe repercussions on United States seafood

producers and, in general, the United States fishing

industry.

Whereas the United States sells over $100 million of fresh

and frozen seafood products to France annually;

Whereas the actions of the Government of France are adversely affecting the United States fishing industry;

Whereas this adverse effect is particularly severe on those

parts of the industry that harvest, process, and market

fresh ‘‘underutilized species’’ such as dogfish, monkfish
2

SRES 183 IS

and skate, and causes disruptions to the normal flow of

commerce for developed United States fisheries such as

salmon and groundfish;

Whereas the French markets for these species and other species are important since Europeans, particularly the

French, value fresh seafood products highly;

Whereas the Government of France is continuing to require

inspections and testing, despite accepting the existing

United States seafood certification programs of the National Marine Fisheries Service and the Food and Drug

Administration;

Whereas the Government of France’s additional inspections

and testing are continuing without adequate justification

or evidence of human health risks;

Whereas the unsubstantiated additional inspections and testing required by the Government of France, which can

take up to four days, delay the delivery of fresh seafood

products to the point where they begin to spoil and thus

have effectively closed the French market to fresh United

States seafood products; and

Whereas the harassment by the Government of France of

seafood producers and products from the United States

violates international agreements and raises serious questions about the usefulness of entering into agreements

with the European Union and France: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (a) calls upon the Government of France to

3 stop immediately its harassment of United States

4 seafood producers and products;
3

SRES 183 IS

1 (b) demand that the Government of France

2 compensate United States companies that have had

3 seafood products damaged by its actions; and

4 (c) calls upon the President of the United

5 States to identify appropriate forms of sanctions

6 that can be taken against the Government of France

7 for its egregious violation of international agree8 ments.

Æ
#### § 1.6851-3 Furnishing of bond to insure payment; cross reference.

See section 6863 and § 301.6863-1 of this chapter (regulations on procedure and administration) for rules relating to the furnishing of bond to stay collection.

[T.D. 7575, 43 FR 58817, Dec. 18, 1978]
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2015-CCRE25

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of August 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special
Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          17,177
<SECURITIES>                                     4,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                       688
<INVENTORY>                                     16,117
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,182
<PP&E>                                          20,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,582
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,791)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,885
<SALES>                                         49,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,328
<CGS>                                           44,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (613)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,841)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
        

</TABLE>
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 11

- 00 120

- CV

IN RE David RODRIGUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 23, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On February 15, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency

motion for temporary relief. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that

relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the

emergency motion for temporary relief are DENIED. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010

- PC

- 2639 , styled In the Guardianship of Maria I. Rodriguez, An

Incapacitated Person

, in the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer

presiding.
20

30

30

30

30

40

30

30

30

20

20

30

20

30

30

30

20

30

30

30

30

30

30

40

20

30

30

30

30

30

40

30

30

20

30

30

40

30

30

30

30

30

30

40

30

20

40

30

30

20

30

30

30

30

30

30

20

40

30

30

30 30

30

40

30

30

30

30

30

40

20

40

30

30

30

40

30

30

20

30

40

20

20

30

20

30

20

30

30

30

30 30

40

30

30

30

30

20

40

40

30

30

30

30

30

40

40

20

30

30

30

30

40

20

30

30

30

30

40

30

40

30

30

30

30

40

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

20

40

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

20

20

20

20

30

50

30

30

50

50

Armstrong

Ranch

Airport

77

77

77

77

77

77

77

77

Tokyo

Hill

Armstrong

Maleta

Windmill

Mustania

Windmill

Encinitos

Windmill

Tecolote

Windmill

Gueras

Windmill

Pita

Camp

Saltillo

Well

La Parra

Ranch SW

Julian

Sarita SW Turcotte

San

Pedro

Ranch

Norias

Armstrong

FEET

FEET

1 190 000 FEET

97°45'

26°

52'

30" 97°

52'

50'

00' 27°

30"

00'

97° 50' 30"

52'

30" 45'

47'

26°

52' 47'

30"

97°

30"

27°

57'30" 57'30"

55' 55'

16 880 000

1 220 000 FEET

16 850 000

E

6 000m 6 6

000m

6 6 6 6 6 6

29

6

29

6

29

000m

29

29

29

29

6

6 6

29

29

6 6

29

29

6 6

29

29

29

6

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

29

6 6 6

000m

12 E 13 14 15 16 17 18

82

16

N

74

83

76

80

75

76

21

86

15

22

12

74

83

77

77

80

21

81

78

N

82

23

85

22

79

13 14 17 18

85

19

86

78

23

19

81

84

79

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

TEXAS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

TX 2697-334

ARMSTRONG, TX

2010

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route US Route State Route

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

ARMSTRONG QUADRANGLE

TEXAS

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Zone 14R

Imagery......................................................NAIP, April 2008

Roads.....................................US Census Bureau TIGER data

with limited USGS updates, 2008

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2008

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 1995

Contours............................National Elevation Dataset, 2009

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator,

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Texas Coordinate System of 1983

(south zone)

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

This map was produced to conform with version 0.5.10 of the

draft USGS Standards for 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Maps.

A metadata file associated with this product is also draft version 0.5.10

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0 1

MILES

MN

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

GN

UTM GRID AND 2010 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 32 ́

10 MILS

4° 50 ́

86 MILS

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

14R

PQ

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 51 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 51

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning economic development, 
     environmental improvement, and stability in the Baltic region.

Whereas from 1945 to the early 1990's Kaliningrad was a Russian 
        military outpost consisting of as many as 200,000 Russian 
        military personnel concentrated in an area of 15,000 square 
        kilometers and Kaliningrad has suffered substantial 
        environmental damage as a result of this military presence;
Whereas since this time the number of Russian military personnel in 
        Kaliningrad has declined significantly, although the number of 
        such personnel in the region is still substantial;
Whereas polls conducted by the Kaliningrad Sociological Center have 
        shown that over 60 percent of the Kaliningrad public favors 
        development of Kaliningrad as an economic bridge between Europe 
        and Russia;
Whereas establishment of Kaliningrad as a free economic zone by the 
        Russian Government in 1994 represents a positive step toward 
        Kaliningrad's integration into the Baltic and European 
        economies and toward giving Kaliningrad an opportunity to 
        flourish economically and to contribute substantially to the 
        well-being of the Baltic region; and
Whereas Russian economic analysts at the Russian Foreign Policy 
        Foundation have noted that militarization of Kaliningrad 
        ``corresponded neither to the needs of the population of the 
        region itself, nor to the necessities of its economic 
        development'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have the right to self-
        determination which extends to the conduct of their foreign 
        policy regarding membership in the North Atlantic Treaty 
        Organization;
            (2) development of the Kaliningrad region as a free trade 
        zone will help ensure the freedom and future prosperity and 
        stability of the Baltic region; and
            (3) continued military reductions in and environmental 
        restoration of the Kaliningrad region will greatly facilitate 
        economic development and prosperity in Kaliningrad.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-10962

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00469-RAL-MAP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

ALBERT JOSEPH SCIPIONE, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(June 12, 2020)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, GRANT and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 20-10962 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

Attorney Lynn Bailey, appointed counsel for Albert Scipione in this direct 

criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of 

Scipione, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s 

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent 

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Scipione’s revocation of supervised 

release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-10962 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 2 of 2
39595.

#### C. T. C. FINANCE CORPORATION v. LONGMIRE.

Decided July 13, 1962.

*Thomas T. Purdom, William G. Grant, Grant, Grizzard & Spears,*for plaintiff in error.

*Lucio L. Russo,*contra.

Hall, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment overruling a motion to dismiss and overruling the renewed general demurrer of the defendant (plaintiff in error) to the petition of plaintiff (defendant in error) after the trial court had entered an order allowing an amendment by plaintiff in which he deleted all numbered paragraphs of his petition and substituted other paragraphs in lieu thereof. The trial court’s order, after allowing the amendment, recited: *“It is*further ordered that the petition originally filed by this plaintiff and the exhibits attached thereto be expunged from the record.” *Held:*

If we wished to be technical we would affirm the judgment on the ground that the effect of the order without doubt was that the trial court *first*allowed the new paragraphs to be inserted and *second*expunged the deleted paragraphs and exhibit of the original petition, so that at no time was the plaintiff’s petition not in existence. This court has heretofore held the contention, that an amendment striking an original petition in its entirety and substituting another, embodying the same cause of action and additional counts, leaves nothing that can be amended, to be without merit. *Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Sharpe,*83 Ga. App. 12, 16 (62 SE2d 427); *Southeastern Stages v. Abdella,*77 Ga. App. 772, 776 (50 SE2d 85).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 181 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 181

              To authorize testimony of a Senate employee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

 Mr. Ford (for Mr. Mitchell) (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              To authorize testimony of a Senate employee.

Whereas in the case of United States v. Eduardo Lopez Ballori, Cr. No. 91-
        380(GG), which was tried in the United States District Court for the 
        District of Puerto Rico in 1992, the United States obtained the trial 
        testimony of Claudia Breggia, a Senate employee;
Whereas by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate; and
Whereas pursuant to section 130b(e)(1) of title II, United States Code, the 
        Senate's authorization of testimony is required in order for witness 
        travel expenses to be reimbursable: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the testimony of Claudia Breggia in United States v. 
Eduardo Lopez Ballori, Cr. No. 91-380(GG) is deemed authorized.

                                 <all>
```