alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

​

**Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of Runway Growth Finance Corp. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Thomas B. Raterman, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:
|  | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

​

| 1       | ​                | ​            |
|---------|------------------------|--------------------|
| ​ | /s/ Thomas B. Raterman |
| ​ | **Name:**              | Thomas B. Raterman |
| ​ | **Date:**              | March 3, 2022      |

​

----
§ 1.706-5 Taxable year determination. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of § 1.706-4, the taxable year of a partnership shall be determined without regard to section 706(c)(2)(A) and its regulations.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies for partnership taxable years that begin on or after August 3, 2015.
[T.D. 9728, 80 FR 45883, Aug. 3, 2015]
Exhibit 11
 POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30
 2008
    
    
    2007A   Net income as reported, Canadian GAAP ($ millions)
    
    
    1,471.1
    
    
    
    483.7B   Items adjusting net income ($ millions)
    
    
    (27.4
    )
    
    
    (25.3
    )C   Net income, US GAAP ($ millions)
    
    
    1,443.7
    
    
    
    458.4D   Weighted average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    313,138,000
    
    
    
    315,180,000E   Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation (Canadian GAAP)
    
    
    10,578,000
    
    
    
    7,959,000F   Net additional shares issuable for diluted earnings per share calculation (US GAAP)
    
    
    10,572,000
    
    
    
    7,940,000CANADIAN GAAPBasic earnings per share (A/D)
    
    
    4.70
    
    
    
    1.53Diluted earnings per share (A/(D+E))
    
    
    4.54
    
    
    
    1.50UNITED STATES GAAPBasic earnings per share (C/D)
    
    
    4.61
    
    
    
    1.45Diluted earnings per share (C/(D+F))
    
    
    4.46
    
    
    
    1.42
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation for the quarter ended January 31, 2008, I, Zafiris G. Zafirelis, Chief Executive
Officer, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Biopure Corporation.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ Zafiris G. Zafirelis        
|Zafiris G. Zafirelis            
|Chairman of the Board, President
|And Chief Executive Officer     

March 17, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 150 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 150

  To authorize representation of Members of the Senate in the case of 
                 Douglas R. Page v. Robert Dole, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 27), 1993

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize representation of Members of the Senate in the case of 
                 Douglas R. Page v. Robert Dole, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Douglas R. Page v. Robert Dole, et al., No. 93-1546, 
        pending in the United States District Court for the District of 
        Columbia, the plaintiff has named ninety-nine Members of the Senate, and 
        a former Member, as defendants; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend present and former Members of the Senate in 
        civil actions relating to their official responsibilities: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
the present and former Members of the Senate who are defendants in the 
case of Douglas R. Page v. Robert Dole, et al.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  unaudited financial statements of Lahaina  Acquisitions,  Inc. for
the three-month period ended December 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such consolidated unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                      US DOLLARS

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                            1,439,632
<SECURITIES>                                        115,297
<RECEIVABLES>                                       218,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 29,152,296
<PP&E>                                            1,281,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                      693,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   42,565,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            28,061,715
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                       1,650,000
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (154,035)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     42,585,972
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4,228,611
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4,813,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (1,605,160)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  722,055
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     298,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 298,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        298,223
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.01





</TABLE>
13‐4725

Yale‐New Haven Hospital v. Nicholls, et al.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

August Term, 2015

(Argued: October 16, 2014     Decided: January 22, 2016)

Docket No. 13‐4725

_____________________________________

Yale‐New Haven Hospital,

Interpleader‐Plaintiff,

v.

Claire M. Nicholls,

Defendant‐Cross‐Defendant‐Appellee,              

v.

Barbara Nicholls,

Defendant‐Cross‐Claimant‐Appellant.

_____________________________________

Before: KEARSE, STRAUB, and WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

A petition for panel rehearing having been made by Defendant‐Cross‐Claimant‐

Appellant Barbara Nicholls, the petition is hereby DENIED.  Judge Wesley dissents

from the denial of panel rehearing in a separate opinion.

KENNETH VOTRE, Votre & Associates, P.C.,  East

Haven, CT, for Defendant‐Cross‐Claimant‐Appellant

Barbara Nicholls.

SUSAN E. NUGENT, Murphy & Nugent, LLC, New

Haven, CT, for Defendant‐Cross‐Defendant‐Appellee

Claire M. Nicholls.
ORDER

A petition for panel rehearing having been made by Defendant‐Cross‐Claimant‐

Appellant Barbara Nicholls, the petition is hereby DENIED.

Judge Wesley dissents from the denial of panel rehearing in a separate opinion.

                                    For the Court:

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe,

Clerk of Court

2
1

WESLEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of panel rehearing:

I dissent from the denial of panel rehearing for the reasons stated in my 

opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Yale-New Haven Hospital v. 

Nicholls, 788 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2015). 

Shortly before our decision in Nicholls, the Supreme Court of Virginia, over 

the vigorous dissent of three of its members, including the Chief Justice, upheld a

state intermediate appellate court opinion that decided substantially the issue 

presented here. See Cowser-Griffin v. Griffin, 771 S.E.2d 660 (Va. 2015), cert. denied, 

No. 14-1531, 2016 WL 100359 (U.S. Jan. 11, 2016). The Virginia appellant then 

filed an unsuccessful petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme 

Court, see 2015 WL 3918905 (U.S. June 24, 2015), which the Virginia appellee 

opposed principally on the ground that the posthumous qualified domestic 

relations order there assigned to an alternate payee payable lump-sum benefits,

as opposed to annuity benefits, and thus no conflict existed between the decision 

of Supreme Court of Virginia and those of other state supreme courts or federal 

courts of appeals, see 2015 WL 7770869 (U.S. Nov. 10, 2015). 
2

Without commenting on the merits of such a distinction, I would note that 

Nicholls squarely presents this important ERISA question in the context of 

annuity benefits.
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, who is carrying out the functions of chief executive officer for Brookfield Business Partners L.P. (the Partnership) pursuant to a Master Services Agreement, dated June 1, 2016, among Brookfield Asset Management Inc., the Partnership, and others, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (i) the annual report of the Partnership on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.  Dated:   March 10, 2017/s/   Cyrus MadonName:
Cyrus   MadonTitle:
Chief   Executive Officer, Brookfield Business Partners L.P.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 192 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 192

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 192

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative days of Thursday, June 
27, 1996, or Friday, June 28, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until noon on 
Monday, July 8, 1996, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, June 27, 1996, 
Friday, June 28, 1996, Saturday, June 29, 1996, or Sunday, June 30, 
1996, pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee 
in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned 
until noon on Monday, July 8, 1996, or until such time on that day as 
may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion 
to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 07-15-00152-CV

Joe Adam Ramirez and Frederick Q.

Herrod

 Appellants

v.

Rissie Owens and Texas Board of

Pardons and Paroles

 Appellees

§

§

§

§

From the 53rd District Court

 of Travis County

November 19, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Quinn

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 19, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 3, 2016

No. 04-16-00030-CV

Patricia A. MAPLES,

Appellant

v.

Royce L. MAPLES,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1997-CI-14007

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time 

is extended to June 15, 2016.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

Solely for the purposes of complying
with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, William D. Gehl, Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas M. Rettler, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, of Gehl Company, certify, based on our knowledge, that:

| | (1) | the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three- and six-month periods ended           June
30, 2006 (the Quarterly Report) to which this statement is an
          exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Gehl Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 9, 2006

| | /s/
William D. Gehl                                                                William D.
Gehl
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Thomas M. Rettler
                                                                  Thomas M. Rettler
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

IRS redesignated the following sections to appear below the undesignated center heading “Regulations Applicable to Certain Bonds Sold Prior to July 8, 1997” and preceding the undesignated center heading “Deductions for Personal Exemptions.” See 62 FR 25507 and 25513, May 9, 1997 for the specific sections involved in the redesignation.

#### § 1.402(e)-1 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAGELLAN
TECHNOLOGY, INC. MARCH 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          20,963
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,879
<PP&E>                                          82,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,600,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          562,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,724
<OTHER-SE>                                     498,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,600,086
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  367,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (428,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (367,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (367,088)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAGELLAN
TECHNOLOGY, INC. MARCH 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         141,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               837,352
<PP&E>                                         531,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,084,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,906,128
<BONDS>                                        526,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,111
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,351,679)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,084,181
<SALES>                                        242,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,617
<CGS>                                           46,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  997,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (848,374)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (848,176)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (198)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (848,374)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18688]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending July 18, 2009

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2004-18468.
    Date Filed: July 16, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: August 6, 2009.
    Description: Application of Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. 
requesting renewal of its certificate of public convenience and 
necessity for Route 820 authorizing it to provide scheduled foreign air 
transportation of property and mail between any point or points in the 
United States, via any intermediate points, to a point or points in 
China open to scheduled international operations, and beyond to any 
points outside of China, with full traffic rights.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-18688 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P