June 19, 2015

Exemption No. 11857

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0513

Mr. Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for Liberty Mutual LLC

Cooley LLP

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 700

Washington, DC 20004−2400

Dear Mr. Hill:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

By letters posted to the public docket on March 2, 2015 and May 15, 2015, you petitioned the 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

(hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The exemption would allow the 

petitioner to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial photography for 

home and business roof inspection, and large structure/fire site inspection.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and 

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the Liberty 1, Liberty 2, Liberty 3, and Liberty 4.
2

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112−95 in 

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited 

operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation 

has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA 

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, 

Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates, and any associated noise certification and testing 

requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection. The FAA has issued grants of 

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

In Grants of Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 

11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. 

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or 

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled 

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of 

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

• The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and 

• A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, 

delegated to me by the Administrator, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is granted an 

exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 

91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 

91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform 

aerial data collection. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed 

below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is hereafter referred to as 

the operator.
3

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the Liberty 1, Liberty 

2, Liberty 3, and Liberty 4 when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. 

Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to 

amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are 

not permitted. 

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The 

exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine 

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at 

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the 

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. 

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than 

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or 

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used 

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS 

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times;

electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC 

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the 

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties 

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its 

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of 

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating 

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the 

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and 

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, 

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. 

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating 

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the 

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 
4

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The 

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension 

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update 

or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then 

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s 

UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding 

updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo 

a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. 

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at 

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such 

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is 

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the 

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre-flight inspection must account for all 

potential discrepancies, e.g., inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the 

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is 

prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the 

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, 

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and 

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a 

state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

Government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the 

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be 

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and 

maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC 

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 
5

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs 

(training, proficiency, and experience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated 

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, 

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During 

training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for 

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights 

under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as 

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current 

FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption 

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available 

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a 

pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the 

intended operation and to operate after that for at least 5 minutes or with the reserve 

power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All 

operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA. The 

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct 

operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification 

(N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.
6

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and 

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the 

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement 

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and 

activities at all times. 

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle. 

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons 

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure 

that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises 

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of 

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety 

of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission 

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of 

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not 

present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered 

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported 

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions 

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and 

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) 

as documented in this grant of exemption.
7

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this 

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards 

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the area of proposed filming. The 3-day 

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities 

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted 

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on-scene operation of 

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N−Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners 

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those 

who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, 

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes 

essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons 

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the 

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS 

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, 

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
Jonathan B. Hill 

T: +1 202 776 2725 

jhill@cooley.com 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations from14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b); 91.7(a); 91.119 

(c); 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.417 (a) & (b).

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform 

Act”) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, (“Liberty Mutual”) Operator of 

Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUASs”) equipped to conduct aerial photography for 1) 

home and business roof inspection and 2) large structure/fire site inspection (hereinafter “the 

Purpose” or “Use Case 1 and 2,” respectively), hereby applies for an exemption from the listed 

Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its sUASs, so long as 

such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be 

established by the FAA in an exemption granted under either Section 333 or Section 49 U.S.C. 

§44701(f) .1

As described more fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of 

small, unmanned sUAS under controlled conditions in airspace that is 1) limited; 2) 

predetermined; and 3) would provide safety enhancements in the fields in which it will operate, 

which now depend upon conventional aircraft or humans climbing high and dangerous 

structures. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of 

Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the 

safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the 

Reform Act.

The name and address of the applicant is: 

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 

157 Berkeley Street 

Boston, MA 02116 

Attn: Antony Parchment 

Ph: 617-357-9500 

 

1 Liberty Mutual relies upon the following exemptions where specific reference to an 

exemption is not provided: Exemptions 11062 thru 11067, 11080, 11109 through 11112, 

and 11114. 
Page Two 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

Regulations from which the exemption is requested: 

14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b) 

14 C.F.R. § 61.133(a) 

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a) 

14 C.F. R.§ 91.119 

14 C.F.R. § 91.121 

14 C.F.R. § 91.151 (a) 

14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a) 

14 C.F.R. § 407 (a) (1) 

14 C.F.R. § 409 (a) (2) 

14 C.F.R. § 417 (a) & (b) 

The Applicant 

Liberty Mutual is a Fortune 100 company based in Boston, Massachusetts and is the third 

largest property and casualty insurer in the United States. Liberty Mutual is committed to 

providing broad, useful and competitively-priced insurance products and services to meet its 

customers' ever-changing needs. Since its founding in 1912, as a worker’s compensation 

insurance company, Liberty Mutual’s mission has been to make the world a safer, more secure 

place to live and work. In addition to its products and services, its safety breakthroughs, industry 

firsts, patents, and innovative programs have helped reduce workplace injury, illness, and 

disability for millions of men and women. It has $38.5B in annual revenues and operates in 17 

countries. 

Commitment to Safety

 For 60 years, the Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety has helped to improve 

the safety and health of people throughout the world. Owned and operated by Liberty Mutual, 

the Institute conducts peer-reviewed research to advance scientific knowledge and help reduce 

injuries and prevent disability. Its credo is “helping people lead safer more secure lives.” That’s 

not just a saying etched into marble over the company’s doors; it is a tenet Liberty Mutual lives 

by. 

 In furtherance of advancing policyholder and worker safety, the Liberty Mutual Research 

Institute was founded in 1954. It is focused on finding ways to prevent injuries and 

disabilities. Its research is available to the public so that all may benefit from its studies. 

Expertise & Experience 

Liberty Mutual has a dedicated Claims Career Academy located in Hopkinton, MA and 

trainers located throughout the country whose mission is to educate and train personnel on new 

claims processes and technology. 
Page Three 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

 

 As part of its commitment to safety and innovation, Liberty Mutual is asking for this 

exemption to reduce the risk of injury to its employees and contractors who participate in the 

process of adjusting claims for damage to buildings and other structures within the United 

States. Liberty Mutual’s sUASs are multi-rotor, radio controlled helicopters. Liberty Mutual’s 

sUAS Liberty 1, weighs 14 or fewer lbs. including payload2

. It operates, under normal 

conditions at a maximum speed of 12 knots (with a programmed limit set to 5 knots while 

conducting an inspection). Ithas the capability to hover, and move in the vertical and horizontal 

planes simultaneously3

. It will operate at altitudes of no more than 400 feet AGL, and only in 

line of sight. It will operate only within the areas that have been pre-approved by the policy 

holder and/or the land owner by giving their consent and no closer than 500 feet to property or 

persons, or a distance established pursuant to the safety assessment allowed in all recent 

Section 333 exemptions. The vehicle has GPS geo-fencing capabilities that will be set to 

prohibit the UAS from leaving the electronically bounded areas. The Liberty 1 sUAS will operate 

in conformity with Liberty Mutual’s UAS Aircraft Flight Manual and Aircraft Flight Operations 

Manual, attached as Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 (hereinafter “the Manuals”)4

. Operations for the 

Liberty 1 UAS in compliance with these manuals will ensure that the sUAS will “not create a 

hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public”5

 and that the aircraft will operate 

in compliance with the conditions set forth in this application. 

The Exemption Request 

Use Cases 1 and 2 

 Liberty Mutual proposes two use cases for the requested exemption: 

1. Roof Inspection

 Liberty Mutual performs thousands of roof inspections throughout the United States 

every year. For most inspections, a Liberty Mutual field adjuster or contractor must ascend a 

ladder and preform the inspection, which has resulted in several significant falls and injuries 

over the years. The sUAS will be operated by a Liberty Mutual field adjustor or a technician to 

 

2

 The Liberty 1 UAS will weigh 12 lbs, but Liberty Mutual is asking for an exemption weight of 

14 lbs. to accommodate possible higher weights in the future due to a possible increase in 

the weight of the camera carried on the aircraft. 

3

 The Liberty 1 is designed to operate at speeds up to 37 knots. It will be programmed to limit 

its operating speed to 12 knots and will undertake imaging at 5 knots. 

4

 Applicant submits the Manuals marked “CONFIDENTIAL,” as they contain proprietary 

confidential business information that is not released to the public and is protected under the 

Freedom of Information Act 5 USC §552 et. seq. 

5

 Reform Act Section 333 (b). 
Page Four 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

capture high resolution imagery and/or video of residential or commercial roofs and elevated 

fascia to a level of quality that allows an adjustor to use the imagery to identify damage and 

wear caused by meteorological events such as wind and hail. For commercial properties, the 

imagery also will be used to identify the condition of equipment on the roof such as air 

conditioning units, other mechanical equipment, ducting, etc. 

2. Large Structure Surveying / Fire Site Surveying 

 The UAS will be operated by a Liberty Mutual adjustor or technician to capture high 

resolution imagery/video of large structures (wide and tall) such as warehouses, high rise 

buildings, bridges, and construction sites, as well as “birds eye” views of fire and explosion 

sites. 

 Given the small size of the sUASs involved, no more than 14 lbs., speed of operation ( 

12/5 knots), and the restricted environment within which they will operate, the applicant falls 

squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned 

that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial operations of UASs to commence 

immediately. 

This exemption application is submitted to fulfill Congress’ express goal in passing 

Sections 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation 

to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national 

airspace system (NAS) before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the 

Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary is required to determine which types of 

UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to national 

security in light of the following: 

 The UAS’s size, weight, speed, and operational capability; 

 Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and 

 Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the Operator. 

Reform Act § 333 (a). Lastly, if the Secretary determines that such vehicles “may operate 

safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe 

operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id. §333(c) (emphasis added).6

 

6

 Applicant interprets this provision to place a duty on the Administrator to not only process 

applications for exemptions under section 333, but for the Administrator to craft conditions 

for the safe operation of the UAS, if it should be determined that the conditions set forth 

herein do not fulfill the statutory requirements for approval. 
Page Five 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This 

statutory authority, by its terms, includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under 

§40101 of the Act: 

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation 

prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any of sections 

44702-44716 of this title if the Administrator finds the exemption is in the 

public interest. 

49 U.S.C. §44701(f). See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203(a)(1) 

This authority to grant exemptions reaches such issues as authorization of commercial 

operation of aircraft without an FAA issued pilot’s license. 

Liberty Mutual in filing this application is requesting that the FAA combine the grant of 

the Section 333 exemption with a standard Certificate of Operation (COA) that will allow 

commercial operations of its Liberty 1 UAS without the necessity of filing for a COA for each 

flight, unless such flight is to be conducted in an area not approved in the exemption. 

Compliance with the conditions agreed to herein and that may be imposed by the FAA, as set 

forth in prior Section 333 exemptions, provide the separation needed from other aircraft. 

In addition, given that all operations will be conducted below 400 AGL feet and no closer 

than 5 nautical miles of the geographic center of an airport as denoted on a current FAApublished aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is 

obtained, Liberty Mutual requests that operations over congested or densely populated areas be 

allowed. Liberty 1 UAS will have GPS geo-fencing, it will operate at a very low altitude, within 

confined areas, at low speed and weighs no more than 14 lbs.. Such operations will only be 

undertaken with the approval of the land or home owner, as set forth herein, and will comply 

with the requirements that operations be no closer than 500 feet to the adjacent building unless 

the land owner has provided permission, and the Operator has made a safety assessment of 

the risk from such operations. (See proposed condition #26) 

Operator Requirements 

 Given the sUAS proposed by Liberty Mutual, Operators should not be required to hold a 

private pilot license. Liberty Mutual believes that 1) the operator, instead of understanding how 

to operate a passenger carrying aircraft, should have knowledge and experience that enables 

the safe operation of a small, remotely piloted UAS,should understand airspace restrictions 

andhow to ensure separation from other aircraft as well as non-participants and property; 2) the 

Liberty 1 UAS has built-in technical capabilities that limit the potential for unsafe operation and 

3) there are other security screening mechanisms already in existence that Liberty Mutual will 

utilize to ensure the operators are acting consistently with national security interests. 
Page Six 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

 Given the UAS safety features outlined below, Liberty Mutual proposes that its 

operations under this Exemption request should not be required to hold a commercial or private 

pilot certification. Instead, Operators should be required to: 

have successfully completed, at a minimum, FAA private pilot ground instruction and 

passed the FAA Private Pilot written examination or FAA-recognized equivalents; have 

completed Liberty Mutual’s training program for operation of the UAS. 

 Liberty Mutual notes that 1) the FAA has found that safety factors permitted operation of 

UASs by Operators with these qualifications in the case of operations pursuant to public COAs 

when the mandatory operating conditions specified above were present;7and 2) that the Notice 

of Proposed Rulemaking entitled Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft 

Systems, 80 F.R. 9544 (February 23, 2015) (“NPRM”), does not require the operator to hold a 

private pilot license or a third class medical. 

 The Liberty 1 UAS has a navigation and control system and auto-pilot that allow it to 

execute very accurate pre-programed flights. Flights are pre-programmed with GPS waypoint 

to establish perimeters beyond which the aircraft will not operate. Flights under auto-pilot are 

not directed by positive manual input, but through pre-programmed flight parameters that are 

executed by the auto-pilot. In the case of unplanned events, the Operator inputs preprogrammed evasive maneuvers from the control unit, and the autopilot executes those 

maneuvers. Pre-programmed Operator interventions include; initiation of holding at present 

position; suspension of mission; fly back to launch point; abort mission and land immediately; 

and emergency power cut off and land (flight termination system).

 Additional automated safety functions and safety enhancing features of the Liberty 1 

UAS include the following: 

1) Auto-pilot detection of lost GPS or of insufficient satellites initiates an immediate 

landing. 

2) Low power on the aircraft triggers escalating alarms at GCS at 35% and 10% levels. 

Low power beyond 10% triggers an immediate landing. 

3) If the auto-pilot detects a lost-link to the ground controller, the UAS will hold position 

at its current location for 5 seconds and if the signal is not restored, execute a return 

to home and land. 

4) Redundant “kill switches” that enable completely shutting the aircraft down in flight in 

the event of a loss of control or uncommanded deviation from the flight path. 

5) The aircraft, weighs less than 14lbs., fully loaded. 

6) The motors are driven by pulse width modulated signals, not analog signals. 

7) The aircraft will operate for the Purposes at no more than 5 knots (while imaging) nor 

above 200 feet above the structure (imaging altitude) or a maximum of 400 feeet 

AGL.

 

7

 See Federal Aviation Administration, Notice N-8900.227, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) 

Operational Approval, at 20-21 (July 30, 2013); 
Page Seven 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

 As the FAA has determined in Exemptions 11062 thru 11067,11080 and 11110 (the 

“Exemptions”), in comparing the requirements for private pilot knowledge and the knowledge 

required for a commercial pilot, that knowledge associated with a private pilot license, and 

therefore private pilot ground school, was sufficient to allow private pilots to operate sUASs 

under those exemptions. Based upon that analysis, Liberty Mutual believes successful 

completion of FAA private pilot ground school is a suitable predicate to operating the sUAS 

under this exemption. 

 Liberty Mutual proposes that the Operator accumulate required sUAS flight training 

hours through the operation of sUASs rather than flight hours in conventional aircraft. Those 

hours are more relevant to the operations proposed herein than hours gained in obtaining a 

private pilot’s certificate in conventional or rotor aircraft. Those aircraft are orders of magnitude 

heavier than the sUAS and carry not only the pilot himself, but also passengers and fuel, none 

of which is carried in the sUAS. These conventional aircraft fly over all sorts of airspace without 

the permission or knowledge of the land owner. The sUAS is controlled by a handheld radio 

controller and the vehicle is operated within the line of sight. The requirements of Part 61.127 

(commercial flight proficiency) and §61.107 (private flight proficiency), to the extent they are 

relevant to UAS operations, can be taught in the training proposed herein. As a review of the 

requirements of part 61.127 and 107 demonstrate, the issues presented as they relate to a 12 

pound aircraft, operating at less than 5 knots during filming operations are those taught in 

ground school and in flight training with the particular UAS and not gained from accumulating 

flight hours in a fixed wing or rotorcraft gas or jet A powered aircraft completing cross country 

flights and take offs and landings at controlled and uncontrolled airports. 

 As to national security review of pilots, each of Liberty Mutual’s pilots will obtain a 

Trusted Traveler review (Global Entry Pass) from TSA prior to operating the UAS. This review 

will vet the Operators against any known terrorist or no fly listings that are relevant. 

 Liberty Mutual additionally asks that the exemption be issued without the requirement for 

a visual observer. As set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety is provided by the size, 

speed and control capabilities of the aircraft, as well as the operational procedures that will be 

applicable to all flight hereunder. These obviate the need for the visual observer. The Operator 

will be operating the aircraft, always within line of sight. He or she will walk and follow the 

aircraft around the inspection area so that while it is flying its pre-programed flight path, the UAS 

will always be directly in his or her line of sight. The Operator will not be distracted by viewing 

the pictures taken during the flight. Rather, once the sUAS is launched, the Operator’s only 

duty will be to watch the flight of the UAS over the structure and intervene to address flight path 

deviations or other issues that arise during the flight. The functions that an observer performs 

where the aircraft is flown at long distances from the launch area will not be necessary as the 

Operator will always have the aircraft in his or her direct sight. The observer also will not be 

necessary because the Operator will conduct a pre-flight inspection of the area, will cordon off 

the area and will perform frequent visual scans of the area while the vehicle is operating. 

Liberty Mutual again notes that the NPRM does not require the use of a visual observer. 
Page Eight 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act; the authority contained in the 

Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the 

proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, reduction in 

environmental impacts, including reduced emissions associated with allowing battery powered 

UASs for these functions instead of turbine or gas power aircraft/rotorcraft and operations with 

pilots having at least a private pilot license, the grant of the requested exemptions is in the 

public interest8

. 

Aircraft and Equivalent Level of Safety 

The applicant proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to civil aircraft that 

have the characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These limitations 

provide for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current 

regulatory structure because the proposed operations represent a safety enhancement to the 

operations conducted with conventional aircraft or with humans climbing up and around 

structures. These conditions are drawn from Exemptions 11136, 11138, 11172, 11174 and 

11177. 

These limitations and conditions to which Liberty Mutual (referred to as “Operator”) 

agrees to be bound when conducting commercial operations under an FAA issued exemption 

include: 

1) Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the aircraft 

described in the Operator’s manual, which is a multi-rotor helicopter weighing up 

to 14 pounds: Liberty 1 (“UA”). Proposed operations of any other aircraft will 

require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant. 

2) The UA may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 12 knots (5 knots 

during inspections). 

3) The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground 

level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the Operator’s manual. 

All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL. 

4) The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the Aircraft 

Operator at all times. This requires the Aircraft Operator to be able to use human 

 

8

 Should the FAA determine that it cannot grant such an exemption for operations without a 

FAA licensed private pilot, despite the showing made herein, under the statutory authority 

the FAA already has, Liberty Mutual will operate its aircraft with pilots holding at least a 

private pilot certificate issued by the FAA. In that event, Liberty Mutual requests that the 

exemption be granted with conditions similar to those contained in numbered paragraphs 

14-15 in Exemption 11136. 
Page Nine 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the 

Operator’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate. 

5) The Exemption Holder’s Manuals must be amended to include all conditions and 

limitations required by the FAA. The Manuals must be maintained and made 

available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the 

conditions and limitations in the exemption and the procedures outlined in the 

Exemption Holder’s Operator’s manual, the conditions and limitations in the 

exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the Aircraft 

Operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its Aircraft’s manual. 

 The Exemption Holder may update or revise its Manuals. It is the Exemption 

Holder’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised 

documents to the Administrator upon request. The Exemption Holder must also 

present updated and revised documents if it petitions for an extension or 

amendment of this exemption. If the Exemption Holder determines that any 

update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this 

exemption, then the Exemption Holder must petition for amendment to its 

exemption. 

6) Prior to each flight, the Aircraft Operator must inspect the UAS to ensure it is in a 

condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe 

operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary 

maintenance has been performed, and the UAS is found to be in a condition for 

safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight 

inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the 

aircraft records. 

7) Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS 

operation or flight characteristics, e.g., replacement of a flight critical component, 

must undergo a functional test flight in accordance with the Exemption holder’s 

Manuals. The Aircraft Operator who conducts the functional test flight must make 

an entry in the UAS aircraft records of the flight. The requirements and 

procedures for a functional test flight and aircraft record entry must be added to 

the Exemption Holder’s Operator’s manual. 

8) The Exemption Holder must follow the manufacturer’s UAS aircraft/component, 

maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements, with 

particular attention to flight critical components that may not be addressed in the 

manufacturer’s manuals. 

9) The Exemption Holder must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record 

keeping requirements in accordance with the Operator’s Manuals. Maintenance, 

inspection, and alterations must be noted in the aircraft logbook, including total 
Page Ten 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

flight hours, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the 

authorized technician returning the UAS to service. 

10) The authorized technicians must receive and document training referenced in the 

Exemption Holder’s Manuals. 

11) Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer 

System and Safety Bulletins. 

12) The Exemption Holder’s maintenance personnel must make a record entry in the 

UAS logbook or equivalent document of the corrective action taken against 

discrepancies discovered between inspections. 

13) Prior to commencing operations, the Aircraft Operator shall have logged at least 

25 hours of total time as a UA rotorcraft pilot and at least ten hours logged as a 

UA pilot with a similar UA type and 5 hours in the make and model. 

 

14) If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return 

to a pre-determined location within the private or controlled-access property 

and land or be recovered in accordance with the Exemption Holder’s Manuals. 

15) The Aircraft Operator must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles 

or emergencies, including unauthorized people entering the flight area, in 

accordance with the Exemption Holder’s Manuals. 

16) The Aircraft Operator is prohibited from beginning a UAS flight unless 

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly 

to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly 

after that for at least 10 minutes. 

17) All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by 

serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have 

identification (N- Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart 

C. Markings must be as large as practicable. 

18) Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for 

operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government 

oversight agency requirements. 

19) The documents required under 14 CFR 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to 

the Operator at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is 

operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or 

any law enforcement official upon request. 
Page Eleven 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

20) The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned 

operations and activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight 

vehicles, parachute activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.). 

21) The UA may not be operated by the Aircraft Operator from any moving device or 

vehicle. 

22) UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR 1.1. 

23) All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). 

The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet 

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the 

Operator. 

24) During operations the UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of the 

geographic center of an airport as denoted on a current FAA-published 

aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is 

obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM, if as 

required by the Operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport 

management must be made available to the Administrator upon request. 

25) The UA may not be operated over congested or densely populated areas unless 

the conditions set for in #26 are satisfied. These populated areas include but 

are not limited to the yellow areas depicted on World Aeronautical Charts 

(WAC), Sectional Aeronautical Charts (Sectionals), or Terminal Area Charts 

(TAC). However, aeronautical charts may not reflect pertinent local information. 

Ultimately, it is the Operator’s responsibility to maintain the minimum safe 

altitudes required by § 91.119 (d) (1). 

26) Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating 

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless: 

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect 

nonparticipating persons from debris in the event of an accident. The 

Aircraft Operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain 

under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating 

persons leave such protection and are within 30 feet of the UA, flight 

operations must cease immediately and/or; 

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where 

the land owner/controller has granted permission and/or the 
Page Twelve 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

Aircraft Operator has made a safety assessment of the risk of 

operating closer to those objects and; 

c. Operations near the Aircraft Operator do not present an undue hazard 

to the Operator per § 91.119(a). 

27) All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property 

with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted. 

28 ) Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be 

reported to the FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. 

Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) 

per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. 

Specific Uses Public Benefits 

 Liberty Mutual proposes use of its UAS provided equivalent or augmented levels of 

safety for each of the uses proposed herein: 

 The present systems of inspecting the roofs of buildings, Use Case 1, and large 

structures site surveys, Use Case 2, are now conducted by either humans climbing on the roofs 

and structures that are steep, tall, slippery, weakened or otherwise hazardous or by the use of 

conventional aircraft. The current procedures can result in significant injuries to the people who 

must climb on the roofs or require the use of aircraft that are orders of magnitude greater in size 

than the sUAS. Either method, manual inspection or large conventional aircraft, results in 

increased risk of injury due to personnel falling off roofs or ladders, carrying heavy ladders and 

dealing with confined and dangerous spaces, or increased risk from low altitude flyovers with 

helicopters or fixed wing aircraft inspecting buildings after damage from storms or other 

disasters, such as earthquakes or fires. Such flights are, of course, significantly more 

expensive than those undertaken with a sUAS. The present system exposes those not only in 

the immediate area of inspection, but those who are along the path of flight associated with the 

arrival and departure of the conventional aircraft at the inspection site because the aircraft must 

be flown to and from the site. By contrast, the sUAS is carried to the site and transits no other 

property. Conventional aircraft carry flammable fuels that are not carried by the UAS and emit 

pollutants associated with internal combustion engines. The sUASs proposed herein are 

battery powered and have no emissions. 

Equivalent Level of Safety 

14 C.F.R. § 61.113(a) & (b);: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations; Pilot in Command; 
Page Thirteen 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

Section 61.113(a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. Unlike a conventional 

aircraft that carries a pilot, passengers, and cargo, the Liberty 1 UAS is remotely controlled with 

no passengers or property of others on board. Section 61.133(a) requires an individual with a 

commercial pilot’s license to be pilot in command of an aircraft for compensation or hire. Liberty 

Mutual respectfully proposes that Operator requirements should take into account the 

characteristics of the particular UAS. Liberty 1 UAV has a high degree of pre-programmed 

control and various built-in technical capabilities that strictly limit the potential for operation 

outside of the operating conditions set forth in the exemption application. 

The Liberty 1 UAS has navigation and control system comprised of a Ground Control Station 

(GCS) and auto-pilot system that can be pre-programmed to set operational boundaries . All 

flights are pre-programmed with precision GPS guidance. Flights are not directed by positive 

manual control except where needed to conduct immediate evasive maneuvers or respond to a 

safety of flight issue. In the case of unplanned events, the Operator may input pre-programmed 

evasive maneuvers from the control unit, and the onboard autopilot executes those maneuvers. 

Pre-programmed Operator interventions include initiation of holding at present position; 

suspension of mission; fly back to launch point; abort mission and land immediately; and 

emergency power cut off and land (Flight Termination System). 

Additional automated safety functions and safety enhancing features of the Liberty 1 include the 

following: 

1.1. Auto-pilot detection of lost GPS or of insufficient satellites initiates an immediate 

landing. 

1.2. Low power on the aircraft triggers escalating alarms at GCS at 35% and 10% 

levels. Low power beyond 10% triggers an immediate landing. 

1.3. If the auto-pilot detects a lost-link to the ground controller, the UAS will hold 

position at its current location for 5 seconds and if the signal is not restored, 

execute a return to home and land. 

1.4. Redundant “kill switches” that enable completely shutting the aircraft down in flight 

in the event of a loss of control or uncommanded deviation from the flight path. 

1.5. The aircraft, weighs less than 14lbs., fully loaded. 

1.6. The motors are driven by pulse width modulated signals, not analog signals. 

1.7. The aircraft will operate for the Purposes at no more than 5 knots (while imaging) 

nor above 200 feet above the structure (imaging altitude) or a maximum of 400 

AGL. 

Given these safety features, Liberty Mutual proposes that Operators of the Liberty 1 UAS should 

not be required to hold a commercial or private pilot certification. Instead, Operators should be 

required to: 

have successfully completed, at a minimum, FAA private pilot ground instruction and 

passed the FAA Private Pilot written examination or FAA-recognized equivalents; 
Page Fourteen 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

have completed the manufacturer’s or Liberty Mutual’s training program for operation of 

the UAS. 

Liberty Mutual notes that the FAA has found that safety factors permitted operation of UASs by 

Operators with these qualifications in the case of operations pursuant to public COAs where the 

mandatory operating conditions specified above were present. See, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Notice N-8900.227, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Operational Approval, at 

20-21 (July 30, 2013). Likewise, Liberty Mutual notes that the NPRM does not require that the 

Operator hold a private pilot license issued by the FAA. 

Given these conditions and restrictions, an equivalent level of safety will be provided by allowing 

operation of the Liberty 1 UAS without a private pilot’s certificate or a commercial pilot’s 

certificate, under the conditions set forth herein. 

The risks associated with the operation of the Liberty 1 UAS (given its size, speed, operational 

capabilities, and lack of combustible fuel) are so diminished from the level of risk associated 

with private pilot operations or commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 with 

conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft), that allowing operations of the UAS as set forth 

above meets or exceeds the present level of safety provided under 14 C.F.R. § 61.113(a) & (b) 

and does not rise to the level of requiring a commercial pilot to operate the aircraft under 

§ 61.133(a). 

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness. 

This regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy 

condition. Should the exemption be granted allowing commercial operation of the UAS without 

an airworthiness certificate, no standard will exist for airworthiness of the UA. Given the size of 

the aircraft and the requirements that the Operator has agreed to as it relates to airworthiness, 

as contained in the manual, an equivalent level of safety will be achieved by insuring 

compliance with the manuals prior to each flight. The FAA has granted exemptions to conduct 

similar operations in Exemptions 11062 through 11067, 11080 and 11110. 

14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum safe altitudes 

 Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 

(d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person 

operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the 

FAA. As this exemption is for a sUAS that is a helicopter and the exemption requests authority 

to operate at altitudes up to 200 AGL, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. . 

 

 The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAS 

as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the 

property owner, facility owner, and/or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the 

property owner and participants, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight 
Page Fifteen 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

operations as set forth in the Manuals. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft 

weighing far more than the maximum 55 lbs. and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated 

with these operations is far less than those presently presented by conventional aircraft 

operating at or below 500 AGL in the aerial photography industry. In addition, the low-altitude 

operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between these small-UAS operations and the 

operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119. The FAA has granted 

exemptions to conduct similar operations in Exemptions 11062 through 11067, 11080 and 

11110. 

14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings 

 This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by 

reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate 

altimeter setting available before departure.” As the Liberty 1 UAS, in manual or emergency 

mode, will not have a barometric altimeter display, but instead a GPS altitude display, an 

exemption will be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the Operator, 

pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Manuals as indicated before flight. The FAA has 

granted exemptions to conduct similar operations in Exemptions 11062 through 11067, 11080 

and 11110. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

Section 91.151(a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under 

VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel 

to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed – (1) During the 

day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 

minutes.” 

The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 40 minutes of powered flight. To 

meet the 30-minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, sUAS flights would be limited to 

approximately 10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the UAS’s proposed flight area and 

the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for 

flight is reasonable. 

Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of 

prior exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate 

without compliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small UAS, in a tightly controlled area 

where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will 

be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that 

Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS. 

 

Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 

30 minutes or 25% of battery power whichever happens first. This restriction would be more 
Page Sixteen 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited 

operating area. 

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 

5745, 10673, 10808 and Exemptions 11062, through11067, 11080 and 11110. 

14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409(a) (2); 91.417(a) & (b): Maintenance 

Inspections

These regulations require that an aircraft Operator or owner “shall have that aircraft 

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except 

as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 

43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.

Given that these sections and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness 

certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accomplished by 

the Operator or manufacturer pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook as 

referenced in the Manuals attached as confidential Exhibits An equivalent level of safety will be 

achieved because these small UASs are very limited in size and will carry a small payload and 

operate only in defined areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise, the UAS 

can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. As provided in 

the Aircraft Flight Operations Manual the Operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order 

prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance 

performed. Moreover, the Operator and manufacturer are most familiar with the aircraft and 

best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of 

safety. The FAA has granted exemptions for similar operations in Exemptions 11062 through 

11067, 11080 and 11110. 

********* 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the 

Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed: 

 Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules: 

14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113(a) & (b); 91.7(a); 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.405(a); 

91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate commercially a small unmanned 

vehicle (55 lbs. or less) in insurance survey operations for homes and large structure claims. 

Privacy and National Security 

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner’s 

prior consent and knowledge. Inspection will be of inanimate objects in areas where the owners 

will have consented to the inspections or otherwise have agreed to allow the UAS and the 

Operator to be in the area where inspection will take place. 
Page Seventeen 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

The size of the UAS, its speed and restricted area of operation do not raise national 

security issues. 

Summary 

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUASs for aerial photography 

for 1) home and business roof inspection and 2) large structure/fire site inspection will enhance 

safety by reducing risk. Conventional operations, using jet or piston powered aircraft, ladders or 

placing people on roofs or tall, hazardous or weakened structures, exposes them to higher risks 

than those created by use of a sUAS. Conventional aircraft that operate at extremely low 

altitudes just feet from the subject being inspected and in extreme proximity to people and 

structures present the risks associated with vehicles that weigh in excess of 6,000 lbs., carrying 

large amounts of jet A or other fuel (140 gallons for jet helicopters). Such aircraft must fly to and 

from the project location. In contrast, a sUAS weighing fewer than 14 lbs. and powered by 

batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel 

carried on board. The sUAS is carried to the target area and not flown. The sUAS will carry no 

passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned 

aircraft flights. 

The operation of small UASs, weighting less than 14 lbs., conducted under the strict 

conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the 

exemptions requested herein. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the 

ground, and in areas that are under the control of the customer for the inspections and, as a 

result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in 

close proximity to the ground and people or the use of individuals to climb the structures to 

conduct the inspections. 

 
Page Eighteen 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012 –size, 

weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas and operation 

within visual line of sight and national security – provide more than adequate justification for the 

grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s UAS for the 

Purposes outlined herein and are consistent with exemptions already granted, including 

Exemptions11171 through 11174, 11176, 11177. 

Sincerely, 

Jonathan B. Hill 

M. Anne Swanson 

 Cooley LLC 

 Counsel for Liberty Mutual LLC. 

 John McGraw 

John McGraw Aerospace Consulting, LLC 

Agent for Liberty Mutual LLC 

cc: James Williams 

Robert Pappas 

Jake Troutman 

Dean Griffith, Esq. 

 Thuy H. Cooper
APPENDIX A 

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 www.cooley.com 

SUMMARY OF LIBERTY MUTUAL SECTION 333 EXEMPTION REQUEST

For publication in the Federal Register, Liberty Mutual hereby provides pursuant to Part 11 a 

summary of its exemption application to allow commercial operation of the Liberty 1 unmanned 

aircraft for purposes of 1) home and business roof inspection; and 2) large structure/fire site 

inspection. An exemption is requested from the following regulations: 

 14 C.F.R. § 61.113(a) & (b); 

 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a); 

 14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c); 

 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 

 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 

 14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a); 

 14 C.F.R. § 91.407(a)(1); 

 14 C.F.R. § 91.409(a)(2); 

 14 C.F.R. § 91.417(a) & (b) 
Jonathan B. Hill

+1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

May 13, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA- Docket 2015-0513 Supplement to Application/Amendment

Dear Sir/Madam:

Enclosed please find an amendment to the application for exemption filed by Liberty 

Mutual Insurance Company found in Docket FAA-2015-0513. Confidential exhibits are not 

included and will be submitted separately with a request for confidential treatment.

Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

Cooley, LLP

Counsel for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Encl.

cc: James Williams

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith

Thuy H. Cooper
Jonathan B. Hill

202/776-2725

jhill@cooley.com

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5800 T: (415) 693-2000 F: (415) 693-2222 WWW.COOLEY.COM

May 13, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA-Docket 2015-0513 Supplement to Application/Amendment

Dear Sir or Madam:

On February 27, 2015, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ( “Liberty Mutual”) submitted 

an exemption application pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11. (FAA Docket 20125-0513) That exemption was 

to authorize the commercial operation of “Liberty I” aircraft, as described in the exemption, in 

commercial service for two use cases also described in the application. 

Liberty Mutual herein amends that application to include the following aircraft:

1. “Liberty 2”. 

2. “Liberty 3”

3. “Liberty 4”

Liberty 2, as described in the Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM), is a fixed wing aircraft. 

Liberty 3 is a quadcopter and Liberty 4 is a hexacopter, each described in detail in the 

confidential AFMs filed herewith. Each weighs less than 55 lbs. and are equipped to conduct 

aerial photography as described in the original application under the conditions outlined in the 

original application or, as may be established by the FAA in the exemption granted under either 

Section 333 or Section 49 U.S.C. §44701(f). As set forth, Liberty Mutual asks that this 

application be processed under the FAA’s Summary Approval Process. To that end, Liberty 

Mutual will accept the conditions set forth in Exemption No. 11309 and 11460 granted on April 

8, 2015 and May 5, 2015, two of several exemptions granted for the use of fixed wing aircraft for 

aerial data collection. 

As this amended Exemption request is identical to the exemptions already granted, this 

request should qualify for summary processing as the FAA has already given public notice of 

and granted similar exemptions. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances 

similar in all material respects to those presented in this petition. In Grants of Exemption Nos. 

11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352),11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see Docket 

No. FAA−2014−0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 

11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the 

enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by 

the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly 
May 13, 2015

Page Two

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5800 T: (415) 693-2000 F: (415) 693-2222 WWW.COOLEY.COM

greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to 

find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.” As with the 

approval of the Closed Set Exemptions and the General Aerial Photography Exemptions, 

approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of 

Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the 

safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the 

Reform Act.

The name and address of the applicant is:

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

157 Berkeley Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02116

Attn: Antony Parchment

Ph: 617-357-9500

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 C.F.R. 61.113 (a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121

14 C.F.R. 91.151 (a)

14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a)

14 C.F.R. 407 (a) (1)

14 C.F.R. 409 (a) (2)

14 C.F.R. 417 (a) & (b)

This amended exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal in 

passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of 

Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the 

national airspace system (NAS) before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 

of the Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary is required to determine which 

types of UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to 

national security in light of the following:

• The UASs size, weight, speed, and operational capability;

• Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and

• Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator.

Reform Act § 333 (a). Lastly, if the Secretary determines that such vehicles “may operate safely 

in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe 

operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id. § 333(c) (emphasis added)1.

 1 Applicant interprets this provision to place the duty on the Administrator to not only process 

applications for exemptions under section 333, but for the Administrator to craft conditions 
May 13, 2015

Page Three

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5800 T: (415) 693-2000 F: (415) 693-2222 WWW.COOLEY.COM

The Federal Aviation Act, in addition to the authority granted by Section 333 of Reform 

Act, expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority by its 

terms includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under § 40101 of the Act, that 

includes sUASs, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must have a current airworthiness 

certificate.

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed 

under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702-44716 of the Transportation 

Act if the Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. §44701(f). See 

also 49 U.S.C. § 44711(a); 49 U.S.C. § 44704; 14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) (1). 

Liberty Mutual business and its proposed uses for the additional aircraft are described in 

its original exemption application in this docket, which is incorporated herein. These aircraft will 

operate at altitudes of no more than 400 feet, as further explained, and only in line of sight. They 

will operate only within the areas as described in the Amended Flight Operations Manual 

(“FOM”) and Aircraft Flight Manuals (“AFMs”) attached as Exhibits 1 through 4.

2 Operations in 

compliance with these manuals will ensure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard to users of 

the national airspace system or the public”3 and that the aircraft will operate in compliance with 

the conditions set forth in this application.

Given the small size of the sUASs involved and the restricted environment within which 

they will operate, the applicant falls squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent level of 

safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial 

operations of UASs to commence immediately. Also due to the size of the UASs, the restricted 

areas in which the relevant sUASs will operate and the fact that aircraft will be flown by pilots 

holding at least a FAA pilot license, approval of the application presents no national security 

issue. 

Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the 

Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the 

proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, reduction in 

environmental impacts, including reduced emissions associated with allowing battery powered 

UASs for these functions instead of turbine or gas power aircraft/rotorcraft and operations with 

pilots having at least a private pilot license, the grant of the requested exemptions is in the 

public interest. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the FAA grant the 

requested exemption and this amendment without delay.

 

for the safe operation of the UAS, if it should be determined that the conditions set forth 

herein do not fulfill the statutory requirements for approval.

2 Applicant submits the amended FOM and AFM for each aircraft applied for hereunder, 

marked “CONFIDENTIAL”, as they contain propriety business information that is not 

released to the public and is protected under the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 553 

etc.

3 Reform Act Section 333 (b).
May 13, 2015

Page Four

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5800 T: (415) 693-2000 F: (415) 693-2222 WWW.COOLEY.COM

AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY

The FAA has granted exemptions to the following regulations in the listed exemptions;

14 C.F.R. §§ (a) and (c ), 61.101(e ) (4) and (5), 61.113 (a), 61.315 (a), 91.7 (a), 91.119 (c), 

91.121, 91.151 (a) (1), 91.405(a), 91.405 (a)(1), 91.409 (a) (1) and (2) and 91.417(a) and (b) to 

allow aerial data collection (See, FAA Exemptions 11309,11460 and 11490)

14 C.F.R. Part 61: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in Command

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. Because the 

UAS will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent 

level of safety of current operations by requiring the PIC operating the aircraft to hold a 

certificate issued by the FAA authorizing operation of any aircraft (ATP, Commercial, Private, 

Recreational or Sport). Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the 

sUAS is remotely controlled with no living thing on board. The area of operation is controlled 

and restricted, and all flights are planned and coordinated in advance as set forth in the Manual. 

The level of safety provided by the requirements included in the Manual exceeds that provided 

by a single individual holding a commercial pilot’s certificate operating a conventional aircraft. 

The risks associated with the operation of the sUAS are so diminished from the level of risk 

associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that allowing 

operations of the sUAS as requested with any certificate issued by the FAA as the PIC exceeds 

the present level of safety achieved by 14 C.F.R. Part 61. The FAA has granted exemptions for 

private pilots to conduct similar operations in Exemptions 11062, 11213, 11360 and 11447.

14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 

(d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person 

operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the 

FAA. As this exemption is for a sUAS that are helicopters and the exemption requests authority 

to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. 

As set forth herein, except for the limited conditions stated in the Manual, the UAS will never 

operate at higher than 400 AGL. 

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAS 

as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the 

property owner, facility owner and local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property 

owner and participants all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations as 

set forth in the Manual. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting far 

more than the maximum 55lbs. proposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk 

associated with these operations is far less than those presently presented with conventional 

aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL in the aerial photography industry. In addition, the lowaltitude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between these small-UAS operations and 

the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119. The FAA has 
May 13, 2015

Page Five

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5800 T: (415) 693-2000 F: (415) 693-2222 WWW.COOLEY.COM

granted exemptions to conduct similar operations in Exemptions 11062, 11213, 11360 and 

11447.

14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by 

reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate 

altimeter setting available before departure.” As each sUAS model in at least one operating 

mode will not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption 

will be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the 

Manual and Safety Check list, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS 

altitude indicator before flight. The FAA has granted exemptions to conduct similar operations 

in Exemptions 11062, 11213, 11360 and 11447.

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under 

VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel 

to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed – (1) During the 

day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 

minutes.” 

The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 40 minutes of powered flight. To 

meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 C.F.R. § 91.151, sUAS flights would be limited to 

approximately 10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the UAS’s proposed flight area and 

the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for 

flight in daylight or night VFR conditions is reasonable.

Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a) falls within the scope of 

prior exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate 

without compliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small UAS, in a tightly controlled area 

where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will 

be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that 

Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS.

Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 

5 minutes of reserve time on the batteries. This restriction would be more than adequate to 

return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area.

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 

5745, 10673, 10808 and Exemptions 11062, 11213, 11360 and 11447.

14 C.F.R. Part 91: Maintenance Inspections

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft 

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except 
May 13, 2015

Page Six

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5800 T: (415) 693-2000 F: (415) 693-2222 WWW.COOLEY.COM

as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 

43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.

Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness 

certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accomplished by 

the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook as referenced in the FOM

attached as confidential See Exhibit 1. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because 

these small UASs are very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in 

areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAS can land immediately and 

will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. As provided in the FOM the operator will 

ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, 

and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most 

familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to 

provide the equivalent level of safety. The FAA has granted exemptions for similar operations in 

Exemptions 11062, 11213, 11360 and 11447.

*********

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the 

Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed:

Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules:

14 C.F.R. §§(a) and (c ), 61.101(e ) (4) and (5), 61.113 (a), 61.315 (a), 91.7 (a), 91.119 

(c), 91.121, 91.151 (a) (1), 91.405(a), 91.405 (a)(1), 91.409 (a) (1) and (2) and 91.417(a) and 

(b) to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55 lbs. or less) in motion picture and 

television operations and aerial data collection. 

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUASs for the Use Cases will 

enhance safety by reducing risk. Keeping employees and contractors off structures and away 

from property that is damaged as the result of manmade or natural disasters will reduce injuries 

and save lives-also reducing costs. Conventional operations, using jet or piston power aircraft, 

operate at extremely low altitudes in extreme proximity to people and structures present risks 

associated with vehicles that weigh in the neighborhood of 6,000 lbs., carrying large amounts of 

jet A or other fuel (140 gallons for jet helicopters). Such aircraft must fly to and from the project 

location. In contrast, a sUAS weighing fewer than 55 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates 

virtually all of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. 

The sUAS is carried to the target area and not flown. The sUAS will carry no passengers or 

crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights.

The operation of small UASs, weighting less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict 

conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the 

exemptions requested herein. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the 

ground, and in areas that are under the control of the customer for the inspections and, as a 

result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in 
May 13, 2015

Page Seven

101 CALIFORNIA STREET, 5TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5800 T: (415) 693-2000 F: (415) 693-2222 WWW.COOLEY.COM

close proximity to the ground and people or the use of people to climb the structures to conduct 

the inspection. 

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012--size, 

weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas and operation 

within visual line of sight and national security – provide more than adequate justification for the 

grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s UASs for the 

Purposes outlined herein and are consistent with exemptions already granted, including 

Exemptions 11309, 11460 and 11490.

Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

M. Anne Swanson

Cooley, LLP

Counsel for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

John McGraw

John McGraw Aerospace Consulting, LLC

Agent for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

cc: James Williams

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith

Thuy H. Cooper