alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 198 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 198

 Extending condolences to the people of Mexico on the tragic death of 
                         Luis Donaldo Colosio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

    Mr. Dodd (for himself and Ms. Mikulski) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Extending condolences to the people of Mexico on the tragic death of 
                         Luis Donaldo Colosio.

Whereas Luis Donaldo Colosio was selected by the Institutional Revolutionary 
        Party to be its official candidate for the August Presidential elections 
        in Mexico;
Whereas Mr. Colosio had ably served the people of Mexico as a government 
        official in the administration of President Carlos Salinas de Gortari; 
        and had demonstrated during his tenure as Secretary of Social 
        Development a compassion for the underprivileged and an understanding of 
        the need for economic and political reforms in order to better meet the 
        aspirations of all of the people of Mexico;
Whereas Mr. Colosio had demonstrated that he was among the most progressive and 
        promising leaders of his country;
Whereas, on March 23, during a campaign event in Tijuana in the presence of more 
        than one thousand people, Mr. Colosio was savagely shot and killed; and
Whereas today the people of Mexico are mourning the tragic and untimely death of 
        Mr. Colosio: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate, That it--
            (1) condemns this senseless act of violence;
            (2) joins with President Clinton in extending the 
        condolences of the American people to the people of Mexico, and 
        most especially to the Colosio family, who have all endured a 
        devastating and terrible loss; and
            (3) pledges the full and unequivocal support of the United 
        States to the government and people of Mexico during this 
        difficult and trying time.

                                 <all>
```
[Cite as State v. Peck, 2013-Ohio-1951.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2012-09-174 

 : D E C I S I O N

 - vs - 5/13/2013 

 : 

JOSEPH R. PECK, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2012-04-0596 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 

315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appellee 

Brandabur & Bowling Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey W. Bowling, 315 South Monument Avenue, 

Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the 

transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original 

papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by 

appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Joseph R. Peck, has filed a brief with this 

court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) 

indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose 
Butler CA2000-00-000

 - 2 - 

any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an 

assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists seven potential errors "that might 

arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this 

court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free 

from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) 

requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is 

wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw 

have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response 

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error 

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of 

counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is 

dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous. 

RINGLAND, P.J., S. POWELL and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
#### § 1.179A-1 [Reserved]
§ 1.410(a)-9 Maternity and paternity absence. ( a ) *Elapsed time* — ( 1 ) *Rule.* For purposes of applying the rules of § 1.410(a)-7 (relating to the elapsed time method of crediting service) to absences described in sections 410(a)(5)(E) and 411(a)(6)(E) (relating to maternity or paternity absence), the severance from service date of an employee who is absent from service beyond the first anniversary of the first day of absence by reason of a maternity or paternity absence described in section 410(a)(5)(E)(i) or 411(a)(6)(E)(i) is the second anniversary of the first day of such absence. The period between the first and second anniversaries of the first day of absence from work is neither a period of service nor a period of severance. This rule applies to maternity and paternity absences beginning on or after the first day of the first plan year in which the plan is required to credit service under sections 410(a)(5)(E) and 411(a)(6)(E).
( 2 ) *Example.* The rules of this section are illustrated by the following example: Assume an individual works until June 30, 1986; is first absent from employment on July 1, 1986, on account of maternity or paternity absence; and on July 1, 1989, performs an hour of service. The period of service must include the period from employment commencement date until June 30, 1987 (one year after the date of separation for any reason other than a quit, discharge, retirement, or death). The period from July 1, 1987, to June 30, 1988, is neither a period of service nor a period of severance. The period of severance would be from July 1, 1988, to June 30, 1989.
( b ) *Other methods.* This paragraph provides a safe harbor for plans that compute years of service under the hours of service methods or permitted equivalencies. Such a plan will be treated as satisfying the requirements of sections 410(a)(5)(E) and 411(a)(6)(E) if the plan increases the minimum period of consecutive 1-year breaks required to disregard any service (or deprive any employee of any right) by one. Thus, a plan will satisfy sections 410(a)(5)(E) and 411(a)(6)(E) without having to compute service for maternity or paternity and sections 410(a)(5)(D) and 411 (a)(4)(D) and (a)(6)(C), by increasing the period of consecutive breaks-in-service from 5 to 6.
[T.D. 8219, 53 FR 31852, Aug. 22, 1988; 53 FR 48534, Dec. 1, 1988]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,767,108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,256,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,550
<INVENTORY>                                  1,047,402
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,273,990
<PP&E>                                      16,780,008
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,745,035
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,628,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,289,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,578
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,887,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,628,002
<SALES>                                      1,113,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,638,701
<CGS>                                          980,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,324,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               750,725
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (436,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (437,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (437,363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1.7  



	Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Division of Resolutions and Receiverships	 	Receivership of Southern Pacific Bank and

Coast Business Credit, a division of Southern Pacific Bank





February 27,
2003 



	

Mr. Loni Woodley, Chief Financial Officer

Amerivision Communications, Inc.

5900 Mosteller Drive, Suite 1850

Oklahoma City, OK 73112	
 	

Via Facsimile 405-600-3646





	Re:
	Waiver of Event of Default




Dear
Mr. Woodley: 


        Reference
is made to that certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of February 4, 1999, between Amerivision Communications, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation ("Borrower")
and Coast Business Credit, a division of Southern Pacific Bank, a California corporation ("Coast") (as amended from time to time, the "Loan Agreement"). All initially capitalized terms used but not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Loan Agreement. 



        On
February 7, 2003, the Department of Financial Institutions of the State of California closed Southern Pacific Bank and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
("FDIC") as its Receiver, which appointment the FDIC accepted. The FDIC as Receiver succeeded to all of Coast's and Southern Pacific Bank's rights, title, and interest in and to the Loans by operation
of law. As used herein, "Lender" refers to the FDIC as Receiver of Southern Pacific Bank. 


        An
Event of Default has occurred under Section 8.1(8) of the Loan Agreement as a result of a Debt Service Coverage Ratio of less than 1.25:1 for the quarter ended
December 31, 2002. Actual Debt Service Coverage ratio was 1.19:1. Lender hereby waives, in this instance, and only in this instance, the Event of Default arising from Borrower's
non-compliance with this covenant. 


        Lender's
waiver as to the matter referenced above shall in no way be deemed to be a waiver of any other, present or future, transaction, event, occurrence or matter and such waiver shall
be limited solely to the matters and circumstances referred to herein. 


12121
Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1400, Los Angeles, California 90025

Telephone: (310) 820~8881 Facsimile: (310) 9797289 





 

        This
letter is limited precisely as written and shall not be deemed: (a) to be a waiver or modification of any other term, condition or covenant of the Loan Agreement or the Loan
Documents, or (b) to prejudice any right or remedy which Lender may have in the future under the Loan Agreement, the Loan Document or applicable law, 



        Please
acknowledge your acceptance and agreement to the terms hereto by executing and returning the enclosed duplicate of this letter to the undersigned. 



	

 	
 	

Sincerely,
	

 	
 	

FDIC as Receiver of Southern Pacific Bank



/s/  JOHN WATKINS    



John Watkins

Loan Officer





cc:
Rick Perkins, Textron Financial Corporation

            Mark Crunelle, Continental Business Credit 


THE ABOVE IS HEREBY AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED THIS    DAY OF February, 2003:  



	

 	
 	

AMERI VISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

an Oklahoma corporation
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  ROBERT D. COOK      
	

 	
 	

Title:	
 	

President




2
#### § 1.346-2 Treatment of certain redemptions.

If a distribution in a redemption of stock qualifies as a distribution in part or full payment in exchange for the stock under both section 302(a) and this section, then only this section shall be applicable. None of the limitations of section 302 shall be applicable to such redemption.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3121

___________ Rudy Stanko, and similarly situated * pre-trial detainees and prisoners, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Robert Patton, individually and in his * official capacity as Director of Douglas * County Corrections, aka, Chief * Deputy of Corrections (See Inmate * Rules and Information Handbook); * Barbara Glazer, individually and in her * Appeal from the United States official capacity as Education and * District Court for the Recreation Coordinator; John Heatley, * District of Nebraska. Chaplin, individually and in his official * capacity as an Appointee and Chaplain * [UNPUBLISHED] at Douglas County Correctional Center; * John Does 1x through 5x, individually * and in their official capacity; John * Hubbard, individually and in his * official capacity as Captain and Acting * Director of Douglas County * Corrections, * * Appellees. * * ------------------------------ * * Rudy Stanko, individually and on * behalf of similarly situated prisoners, * * Appellant, *1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2- * v. * * Unknown Sanchez, Sargent, * Individually and in his Official * Capacity as Supervisor; John Hubbard, * Individually and in his Official * Capacity as Acting Director; Barb * Glazer, Individually and in her * Official Capacity as Scheduling * Supervisor; John Does 1x through 6x, * Individually and in their Official * Capacities, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 22, 2009 Filed: December 29, 2009

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Rudy Stanko appeals from the District Court’s 1 order granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment in two civil rights actions that Stanko filed while he was confined as a pretrial detainee at the Douglas County Corrections Center in Omaha, Nebraska. Having reviewed th e summary judgment decision de novo, see Patel v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons , 515 F.3d 807, 812 (8th Cir. 2008), and having considered all of Stanko’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, w. Paul Gephart, certify that:

l.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Community National Bancorporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	[Intentionally omitted]

(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003.

/S/ W. Paul GephartW. Paul Gephart
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PUBLIC LAW 115–33—MAY 12, 2017 131 STAT. 845 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 496 (H.R. 1346): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–85 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure) accompanying H.R. 1346. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Mar. 8, considered and passed Senate. 

Apr. 25, 27, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–33 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To repeal the rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal 

Transit Administration entitled ‘‘Metropolitan Planning Organization Coordination 

and Planning Area Reform’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

The rule issued by the Federal Highway Administration and 

the Federal Transit Administration entitled ‘‘Metropolitan Planning 

Organization Coordination and Planning Area Reform’’ (81 Fed. 

Reg. 93448 (December 20, 2016)) shall have no force or effect, 

and any regulation revised by that rule shall be applied as if 

that rule had not been issued. 

Approved May 12, 2017. 

Applicability. 

May 12, 2017 

[S. 496]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 19 (Friday, January 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, January 27, 2009, 9 
a.m. to January 27, 2009, 1 p.m., Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 
Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the 
Federal Register on December 12, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 240.
    The location of the meeting was changed to Rockville Hilton Hotel, 
1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 22, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-1844 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
TS-ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2 

Worker/Occupational Exposure Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter
### Re: HPV 2 CASRN 68479-98-1

68479-98-1 68479-98-1

Albemarle data for review Albemarle data for review Albemarle data for review ( Docket reference Docket reference Docket reference 2007-0531-0677 2007-0531-0677 )

) 5 attachments attachments Chuantung Lin Chuantung Lin to: Paul Campanella 09/06/2012 03:18 PM Cc: John Schaeffer, Kathy Calvo, Marcus Aguilar, Tracy Williamson, Myrta Christian Hi Paul, The subject line indicated there were 5 attachments attachments attachments , but only three were attached

only three were attached only three were attached in this email. Do I miss any attachment? Regarding these three test results from the testing of Vapor Pressure (V.P.), Log Kow, and Water Solubility endpoints, all the tested results and the test methods used in each endpoint testing are reviewed and they are adequate and acceptable to EPA to fulfill the test requirements for these three endpoints. Please let me know If you have any question regarding this matter. Thanks!
Daniel

______________________________________________ Dr. Daniel Chuantung Lin Industrial Chemistry Branch Office of Chemicals Safety and Pollution Prevention US EPA 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (7406M) Washington, DC 20460 [Deliveries to: 1201 Constitution Ave., NW, EPA East, Room#:5133E, Washington, DC 20460] 202-564-8584 (direct) 202-564-8740 (branch) 202-564-8679 (fax)

Paul Campanella 09/06/2012 12:35:40 PM Daniel, Please review the attached data submis...
From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US To: Chuantung Lin/DC/USEPA/US Cc: John Schaeffer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPA/US, Kathy

Calvo/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/06/2012 12:35 PM Subject: HPV2 CASRN 68479-98-1 Albemarle data for review ( Docket reference 2007-0531-0677) 5

attachments Daniel, Please review the attached data submission and give us your opinion regarding the adequacy of the data for the test rule. Thanks

Albemarle A5 Water Solubility.pdf Albemarle A3 Vapor Pressure .pdf Albemarle A4 Octanol water.pdf Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D. Chemical Information and Testing BranchChemical Control Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 202-564-8091