alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 287 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 287

  To express the sense of the Senate regarding regulation of mercury 
                hazardous waste, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           November 30 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

Mr. Wellstone (for himself, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Jeffords) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To express the sense of the Senate regarding regulation of mercury 
                hazardous waste, and for other purposes.

Whereas there has been a 2- to 3-fold global increase in mercury in the 
        environment since the 1850's, increases of 3.4 times have been found in 
        wilderness areas of the United States, and much higher increases have 
        been found in developed areas of the United States;
Whereas mercury is truly a national and international concern because mercury is 
        atmospherically transported indiscriminately across political 
        boundaries;
Whereas mercury poses a serious and growing public health and environmental 
        problem even when released in minute quantities;
Whereas mercury presents particular problems in aquatic systems where mercury 
        bioaccumulates;
Whereas human consumption advisories have been issued in at least 34 States 
        because of the high levels of mercury contamination in fish, resulting 
        in losses to the tourism and fishing industries and related activities;
Whereas atmospheric deposition resulting from human activities, including waste 
        disposal, contributes most of the mercury loading to the environment;
Whereas numerous studies have indicated that mercury-containing lamps will soon 
        become the largest contributor of mercury to municipal waste streams in 
        the United States;
Whereas the United States, through the Environmental Protection Agency, is 
        working cooperatively within the international community to reduce 
        global risks of mercury in the environment;
Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency is already actively supporting 
        efforts to virtually eliminate releases of mercury in the Great Lakes 
        Region; and
Whereas the waste management priorities of the United States encourage recycling 
        before waste disposal: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the Environmental 
Protection Agency should not exempt mercury hazardous wastes from 
hazardous waste regulation but instead should adopt waste management 
policies and rules that seek to minimize all releases of mercury into 
the environment while encouraging the recycling of mercury-containing 
fluorescent lamps and other mercury-containing devices.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3862EA

_____________ Carrie Woods Gray, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. City of Helena; Joann Smith, * Individually and in her official capacity * [UNPUBLISHED] as Mayor, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: April 17, 1998

Filed: April 22, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Ca rrie Woods Gray appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment on Gray's race-based employment discrimination claim. Having reviewed the record and the materials submitted bythe parties, we see no error by the district court. We also conclude that an extended discussion is unnecessary in this fact-intensive case. We believe the district court is correct, and we affirm on the basis of the district court's memorandum opinion and order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFunding and Strategic Alignment Guidance for Infusing Small Business Innovation Research Technology into NASA Programs Associated with the Science Mission DirectorateThis report is intended to help NASA program and project managers incorporate Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) technologies that have gone through Phase II of the SBIR program into NASA Science Mission Directorate (SMD) programs. Other Government and commercial project managers can also find this information useful.Document ID20150019484Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNguyen, Hung D.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Steele, Gynelle C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 20, 2015Publication DateSeptember 1, 2015Subject CategorySpace Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN21565E-19120NASA/TM-2015-218856Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 471296.01.03.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordsearth scienceastrophysicssolar systemheliophysicsplanetary scienceAvailable DownloadsNameType20150019484.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Fred J. Herzig *v.*Board of Education of the Town of West Hartford et al.

Submitted March 9

decided March 12, 1964

The petition by J. Read Murphy for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted, provided that the brief is filed within twenty days after the filing of the appellants’ brief.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bing Yeh, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:
5. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
6. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
7. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
8. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
9. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
10. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 5, 2004



|/s/ Bing Yeh                                  
|----------------------------------------------
|Bing Yeh
President and Chief Executive Officer

---
# ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number011 Attachment Name Attachment 11 LaPbTiZrO 

# Associated PMNSection Number Pt.2, Sec.A, id. (#4) Doesnotcontain CBI



# ReportNumber CONSi 1031778685535100~ 00 0 (I)D 

### 0~ U - 

### 0 Cd~~O 

### 00 0 79 

### 04 0 c) r * 

## ~ ~~~ 0 S 

# ._____________

0n 

### 5) 0 c,-

O0 0 * SO
0 +, 0 

### 00- in0-,

cz~00 00 i -4 

### I C2 

### C4 

## to 6 0 

# 0.42 o d) co (DQ Cl) 40 l
-05 0) 0i N cisL 

### 00 ol 0.0. c -o0 0 C 0- *l 0 0 

### M V
4- 0 

## ~t A CA
c - 

## ~IC40

. C) "

## N um o

## ~~;

(U(A8,>

60 0 0000 00 Cf) 0 

# z 0

0z0

cl >


### > a) 

### Sl u 0 0 0 00c 0c

c 0 o 0) in, 

### 0 ) 1))
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40069 Summary Calendar

NITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GONZALO SOSA-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-513-1

-------------------- February 1, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gonzalo Sosa-Morales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sosa-Morales has filed a response, arguing that the district court erred by imposing a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) based on a prior Texas conviction for theft.No. 99-40069 -2-Our independent review of the brief, the record, and SosaMorales’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct

appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 12, 2002 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41275 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE MANUEL MARTINEZ-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-449-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Manuel Martinez-Reyes appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United Statesafter deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MartinezReyes argues that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case. He contends that the unconstitutional portions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 should be severed from the statute. He asks us to vacate hisNo. 01-41275 -2- conviction and sentence, reform the judgment to reflect a conviction only under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and remand his case for resentencing under that provision.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Martinez-Reyes acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been called into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489-90 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Id. at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
§ 1.527-7 Newsletter funds. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of this section, a fund established and maintained by an individual who holds, has been elected to, or is a candidate (within the meaning of section 41(c)(2)) for nomination or election to, any Federal, State, or local elective public office for the use by such individual exclusively for an exempt function, as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, shall be a newsletter fund. If assets of a newsletter fund are used for any purpose other than the exempt function of the newsletter fund as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, such amount shall be treated as expended for the personal use of the individual who established and maintained such fund. In addition, future contributions to such fund are treated as income to the individual who established and maintained the fund. In such a case, the facts and circumstances may indicate that the fund was never established and maintained exclusively for an exempt function as defined in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Determination of taxable income.* A newsletter fund shall be treated as if it were a political organization for purposes of determining its taxable income. However, the specific $100 deduction provided by section 527(c)(2)(A) shall not be allowed.
( c ) *Exempt function.* For purposes of this section, the exempt function of a newsletter fund consists solely of the preparation and circulation of the newsletter. Among the expenditures treated as preparation and circulation expenditures of the newsletter are: ( 1 ) Secretarial services,
( 2 ) Printing,
( 3 ) Addressing, and
( 4 ) Mailing.
( d ) *Nonexempt function purposes.* Newsletter fund assets may not be used for campaign activities. Therefore, an exempt function of a newsletter fund does not include: ( 1 ) Expenditures for an exempt function as defined in § 1.527-2(c) or
( 2 ) Transfers of unexpended amounts to a political organization described in section 527(e)(1).
( e ) *Excess funds.* Excess funds held by a newsletter fund which has ceased to engage in the preparation and circulation of the newsletter are treated as expended for the personal use of the individual who established and maintained such fund. However, to the extent such excess funds are within a reasonable period of time: ( 1 ) Contributed to or for the use of any organization described in paragraph (1) or (2) of section 509(a) which is exempt from taxation under section 501(a),
( 2 ) Deposited in the general fund of the U.S. Treasury or in the general fund of any State or local government (including the District of Columbia), or
( 3 ) Contributed to any other newsletter fund as described in paragraph (a) of this section,
the excess funds are not treated as expended for the personal use of such individual. In such a case the individual is not allowed a deduction under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 for such contribution or deposit. [T.D. 7744, 45 FR 85735, Dec. 30, 1980]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Servicer and Special Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-HAUL (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 10.8 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 16

- 00505

- CR

IN RE Robert MARTINEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 17, 2016

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On August 8, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order from

this court directing the clerk of the county court and a court reporter to provide him with copies of

transcripts of hearings held on February 4, 2014, July 8, 2014, and December 19, 2014. This court

only has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in

the court of appeals district” and ot her writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See

T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221 (a)

- (b) ( West 2004)



### . Because Relator failed to show the requested

writ of mandamus is necessar y to enforce our jurisdiction, R elator’s petition for writ of man damus

is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 307125, styled State v. Robert Martinez , pending in the County Court at

Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John Longoria presid ing.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Fonix  Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas A. Murdock, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                      /s/ Thomas A. Murdock
                                                    Thomas A. Murdock
                                                    Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Fonix  Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Roger D. Dudley,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                                      /s/ Roger D. Dudley
                                                    Roger D. Dudley
                                                    Chief Financial Officer