alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wienandt Estate

*M. Paul Smith,*for accountant.

March 19, 1952.

. Holland, P. J.,

The first and final account of Julia M. Wienandt, executrix, was examined and audited by the court on March 5, 1952.

The account shows a balance for distribution of $1,785.40, composed of accounts receivable $1, and cash.

The following claims were presented to the accountant and admitted to be due and owing: . . .

These claims total $6,266.08, so that the balance for distribution is grossly insufficient to pay them in full. They must abate proportionately. . . .

The estate is insolvent and there is no transfer inheritance tax due the Commonwealth.

The accountant has taken credit for payment of funeral expenses in the sum of $558. In an insolvent estate $300 is the maximum allowed by this court for funeral expenses so that the accountant is surcharged in the sum of $258.

An innovation is found in section 622(4) of the Fiduciaries Act of April 18, 1949, P. L. 512, making “the cost of a gravemarker” a preferred claim against insolvent estates in the order of preference in said section provided. It is mandatory upon the court, therefore, to establish the fair and reasonable amount *365allowable for this purpose. In the exercise of this discretion, this court fixes the sum of $50 as the maximum amount allowed as a preference.

The accountant has taken credit for $129 for a gravemarker. She is accordingly surcharged with $79.
#### § 1.641(b)-1 Computation and payment of tax; deductions and credits of estates and trusts.

Generally, the deductions and credits allowed to individuals are also allowed to estates and trusts. However, there are special rules for the computation of certain deductions and for the allocation between the estate or trust and the beneficiaries of certain credits and deductions. See section 642 and the regulations thereunder. In addition, an estate or trust is allowed to deduct, in computing its taxable income, the deductions provided by sections 651 and 661 and regulations thereunder, relating to distributions to beneficiaries.
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor401 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha
Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C32 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement,
I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the
Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its
performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.



|/s/ Leslie Hayton | 
|----------------- | 



Leslie Hayton

Managing Director

Wells
Fargo Bank



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

d0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140976

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140976 COA: 290525 Wayne CC: 08-012764-FC MCARTHUR JUNIOR POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION


     To  my  knowledge,  this  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of  Tri-County  Financial
Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, and the information  contained in this Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                      By: /s/ Michael L. Middleton
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Michael L. Middleton
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



                                      By: /s/ William J. Pasenelli
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          William J. Pasenelli
                                          Executive Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer

May 12, 2004
H. Con. Res. 123 Agreed to January 22, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF REGULATIONS.

The regulations applicable to employing offices which are not

the House of Representatives or the Senate and covered employees

who are not the employees of the House of Representatives or

the Senate which are to be issued by the Office of Compliance

before January 23, 1996, are hereby approved on a provisional

basis until such time as such regulations are approved in accordance

with section 304(c) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995

(2 U.S.C. 1384(c)).

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
§ 1.581-2 Mutual savings banks, building and loan associations, and cooperative banks. ( a ) While the general principles for determining the taxable income of a corporation are applicable to a mutual savings bank, a building and loan association, and a cooperative bank not having capital stock represented by shares, there are certain exceptions and special rules governing the computation in the case of such institutions. See section 593 for special rules concerning reserves for bad debts. See section 591 and § 1.591-1, relating to dividends paid by banking corporations, for special rules concerning deductions for amounts paid to, or credited to the accounts of, depositors or holders of withdrawable accounts as dividends. See also section 594 and § 1.594-1 for special rules governing the taxation of a mutual savings bank conducting a life insurance business.
( b ) For the purpose of computing the net operating loss deduction provided in section 172, any taxable year for which a mutual savings bank, building and loan association, or a cooperative bank not having capital stock represented by shares was exempt from tax shall be disregarded. Thus, no net operating loss carryover shall be allowed from a taxable year beginning before January 1, 1952, and, in the case of any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1951, the amount of the net operating loss carryback or carryover from such year shall not be reduced by reference to the income of any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1952.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11737, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 8697, 61 FR 66588, Dec. 18, 1996]
| (logo)WELLS           FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan ChaseCommercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee,and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respectto Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series2015-C30 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Reporting Period.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice President Wells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Ronald Johnson et al.

Submitted February 16

decided February 27, 1968

*Stephen L. Fine,*in support of the application.

The application by the defendants Ronald Johnson, Harry J. “Buddy” Bonner and James A. Cotter for a temporary stay of the criminal proceedings in the Superior Court in New Haven County, and for other relief, is denied.
QUERYOBJECT SYSTEMS CORPORATION                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

Computation of Net Loss Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Six Months Ended June 30,         Three Months Ended June 30,
                                                              2000            1999                2000            1999
                                                              ----            ----                ----            ----

<S>                                                         <C>              <C>                <C>             <C>
Common shares outstanding at beginning of year              4,983,663        1,707,662          4,983,663       1,707,662

     Conversions of preferred stock into common shares      3,489,252           76,118          4,211,747         122,919

     Warrants exercised into common shares                    571,970          209,080            591,696         325,212

     Stock options exercised into common shares                17,505               --             24,301              --
                                                          -----------       ----------          ---------      ----------
Weighted average common shares outstanding                  9,062,390        1,992,860          9,811,407       2,155,793
                                                          ===========       ==========          =========      ==========

Net loss                                                  $(4,066,794)     $(3,252,857)         2,071,902)    $(1,535,320)
                                                          ===========       ==========          =========      ==========

Basic and diluted net loss per common share               $     (0.45)     $     (1.63)             (0.21)    $     (0.71)
                                                          ===========       ==========          =========      ==========
</TABLE>
Supporting Materials #4 

Documents that Support use of Certain Control 

Technologies or Inventory Development 

See Attachment: 

GRIC AQMP
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PROFESSIONAL PAPER 543-F

EXPLANATION
TYPES OF GROUND BREAKAGE*

Ground cracks with associated eruptions of
ground water and sand

sy

BELUBATM LAKE

O°
Ground cracks

.
Cracks and (or) pressure ridges in muskeg

4a

Ground cracks associated with slumping to-
wards unconfined faces

a

Ground cracks with sand eruptions; asso- é

PLATE 2
,
6 es
ee
SULLY 9
of FEB
a!
01K ANG HORA tl x0 E. S
oth ot
| ty lo

ciated with slumping towards unconfined
faces

a

Ground cracks in sand and gravel of flood
plains or valley trains

ry

Landslides or avalanches

/

J

2 [ Kalitoney >
Kaioig 0.0K z
an sy R

Cope Kosilol

/

Chis seg

/ tie =
—0.5¢, eS,

Ninilebit

‘annery GysoRvEvED

‘ape Ninilehik 2 SAN

O+1K

Anctr Pont

aii

Auodstine stand

fo icant SAS
| laos ee
KAMISH4 ch, : :
oA Y

/ |
7 |

153°

INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D.C.—1967—G67277

Base by U.S. Geological Survey, 1956

EXPLANATION (CONTINUED)

MEASUREMENTS OF TECTONIC
LAND-LEVEL CHANGE **

0 -4.4B

Vertical tectonic displacement, in feet, meas-

ured along shore with tide level as a datum

in 1964; upper growth limit of barnacles
(Balanus)

° —4.2BB
Vertical tectonic displacement, in feet, as
measured difference between pre- and post-
earthquake shoreline features in 1965;
upper growth limit of barnacles (Balanus)

etMtMl (+141)

Vertical tectonic displacement, in feet, along
shore as estimated by local resident; meas-
urements given for 1964 and [1965]

541K

Vertical tectonic displacement, in feet, along
shore as estimated by Karlstrom (1964)

e—2.6TP oe (—2.3TP]

Vertical tectonic displacement, in feet, meas-
ured at standard U.S. Coast and Geodetic
Survey tide-gage station; measurement
given for 1964 and (or) [1965]; figure for
Homer Spit is a tide-gage reading of 5.4
feet less estimated surficial compaction of
unconsolidated sediments

° -3.9T oe (-4.6T]

Vertical tectonic displacement, in feet, meas-
ured at temporary U.S. Coast and Geodetie
Survey tide-gage station. Preearthquake
observations were made between 1906 and
1957; postearthquake measurements were
made in 1964 and [1965]; most of the dis-
placement occurred during the earthquake

2° -5.6S (-1.28]

Vertical tectonic displacement, in feet, meas-
ured at U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey
bench mark. Preearthquake observations
were made between 1922 and 1952; post-
earthquake measurements were made in
1964 and [1965]; most of the displacement
occurred during the earthquake

Isobase of tectonic land-level change; esti-
mated accuracy +2 feet

*Ground breakage in the “Zone of Extensive
Ground Breakage” is not shown. Detailed
location of ground breakage in this area
is given on the map of the ground breakage

ve, in the Kenai Lowland
Land-level change data including location of
zero isobase of tectonic land-level change
by George Plafker

MAP OF THE COOK INLET AREA, ALASKA, SHOWING LOCATION OF
GROUND BREAKAGE AND TECTONIC LAND-LEVEL CHANGES

SCALE 1:1 000 000

10 10 20 30

40 50 MILES

CECErErer

10 ° 10 20 30.40

50 KILOMETERS

REEE

CONTOUR INTERVALS 50, 100, 150 AND
DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL

300 FEET
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8594

BENJAMIN HENDERSON JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BERT M. MONTAGUE; PATRICIA S. CONNOR; JUDITH

CAREEN; STEVEN H. GOLDBLATT; MICHELLE J.

ANDERSON; DAURIE J. SIMMONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-1681-AM)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Henderson Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice. The complaint may be saved by amendment. Thus, we have no jurisdiction

over the current appeal. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local

Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Roger Allen POSTMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-35747.

D.C. No. CV 01-00589-BR.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 17, 2002.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and, RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Postmus’s motion for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM**

Roger Allen Postmus appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of his diversity action against several pharmaceutical companies and a bank, *332alleging conspiracy, fraud, negligence, product liability, medical malpractice, false arrest, and wrongful death. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). *Thompson v. Davis,*282 F.3d 780, 783 (9th Cir.2002). The district court properly dismissed Post-mus’s action because his claims were legally frivolous. *See Denton v. Hernandez,*504 U.S. 25, 33, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992). Postmus was given leave to amend his complaint before it was dismissed and he failed to cure its defects. *See Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir.2000).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.5700 Cold pack. ( a ) *Identification.* A cold pack is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of a compact fabric envelope containing a specially hydrated pliable silicate gel capable of forming to the contour of the body and that provides cold therapy for body surfaces.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807. The device also is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
Chapman, Brooke (OST) 

From: Virginia Haley [VHaley@sarasotafl.org] 

Sent: Thursday. September 16. 2010 12:42 PM "'^Pi^O'fnrf -r ^^rTo: Chapman, Brooke (OST) 'VriKl^ipofrvr^/r 

Cc: Fredrick Piccolo; Michael Walley •^•^..'^•i.''••^ .--l^'^i^^'J'^'N 

Subject: Support for DOT-OST-2010-0124 •^^-•JM J Uh>,;|-|.AliCl\'3 

Dear Ms. Chapman. 

^^'1 HAVj) A Ij: ^^ J J 

I am writing in support to the Surasoia Manatee Airport Authority'.s grant application under DOT-OST-2010-

0124. 

The Sarasota Convention & Visitors Bureau fully supports this gram application for funding to increase and 

strengthen airport marketing initiatives. The SCVB has documented significant negative consumer perception 

issues created by the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Awarding the grant requested is paramount to moving 

towards returning positive passenger levels for the Gulf Coast region of Florida. 

Additionally, we fully support the award of grant funds for the purchase of airport ground liandling equipment 

that will allow for lower operating costs at our airport. SRQ. and thereby bring our aiiport and community into a 

more competitive position when compared with larger aiiports in the region. 

Thank you kindly for including this letter with the Sarasota Manatee Grant Application, and considering our 

support when evaluating their application. 

Sincerely. 

Virginia J. Haley, CDME 

President 

Sarasota Convention & Visitors Bureau 

766 Hudson Ave., Ste A 

Sarasota, FL 34236 

941 955 0991 ext. 107 

www.sarasotafl.orq 

Making Sarasota County the must-see destination on Florida's Gulf Coast.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38683-38684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: StarNet Insurance 
Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. I to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2009 Revision, published July 1, 2009, at 74 FR 31536.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company:
    StarNet Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i> 40045). BUSINESS ADDRESS: 
475 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, CT 06830. PHONE: (203) 542-3800. 
UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $10,963,000. SURETY LICENSES C/: AL, AK, 
AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MI, 
MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, 
TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY. INCORPORATED IN: Delaware.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2009 Revision, to 
reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to the underwriting 
limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of

[[Page 38684]]

the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and 
Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: July 24, 2009.
Rose M. Miller,
Acting Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. E9-18336 Filed 8-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M