alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ``Modeling Immunity for 
Biodefense''.
    Date: April 6-7, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel Bethesda (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 
8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Paul A. Amstad, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/
NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 
301-402-7098, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f3f2e223c3b2e2b0f21262e262b6121262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4636272b3532272206282f272f2268282f2e68212930">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Regulatory T cells in Autoimmune 
and Inflammatory Diseases.
    Date: April 30, 2010.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
3118, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sujata Vijh, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/
NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
594-0985, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8aeb1b2b0ab98b6b1b9b1bcf6b6b1b0f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3a5bab9bba093bdbab2bab7fdbdbabbfdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 2, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4836 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit
      31.02**








**CERTIFICATION**





I,
      Dennis
      E. Bunday, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Williams Controls Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.


Date: May
              11, 2007
            By:
            /s/ DENNIS
              E. BUNDAYDennis
                E. BundayChief
                Financial
                Officer
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.1850 Diagnostic muscle stimulator. ( a ) *Identification.* A diagnostic muscle stimulator is a device used mainly with an electromyograph machine to initiate muscle activity. It is intended for medical purposes, such as to diagnose motor nerve or sensory neuromuscular disorders and neuromuscular function.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
EX-10.62



 




EXHIBIT 10.62 


AMENDMENT TO MERGE THE

KEYCORP EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN

INTO THE

KEYCORP SECOND EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN



WHEREAS, KeyCorp established the KeyCorp Executive Supplemental Pension Plan (“Plan”) to provide a
nonqualified supplemental retirement benefit to a select group of management or highly compensated
employees as described in Section 201(2), 301(3) and 401(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended, and



WHEREAS, in conjunction with the enactment of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, KeyCorp elected to freeze all future accruals to the Plan as of December 31, 2004, and to
establish a KeyCorp Second Executive Supplemental Pension Plan that in large part mirrors the terms
and conditions of the Plan while also meeting the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, and



WHEREAS, in maintaining the Plan and the KeyCorp Second Executive Supplemental Pension Plan KeyCorp
has been required to maintain duplicate administration structures for each respective plan, and



WHEREAS, to prevent this duplication of administration and the associated confusion associated with
multiple plans it is desired that the Plan be merged into the KeyCorp Second Executive Supplemental
Pension Plan, and that the Plan cease to exist separate and apart from the KeyCorp Second Executive
Supplemental Pension Plan.



NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended to add a new Article XI to the Plan, to be effective as
of December 31, 2006, to read in its entirety as follows:




“ARTICLE XI

MERGER INTO THE KEYCORP SECOND EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN





	 	11.1	 	Merger of the Plan. Effective December 31, 2006 the Plan is
hereby merged into and made a part of the KeyCorp Second Executive
Supplemental Pension Plan, and all benefits that have accrued under the Plan
shall be merged into and shall become a part of the KeyCorp Second Executive
Supplemental Pension Plan.”





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, KeyCorp has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be executed by its duly
authorized officer as of the 21st day of December, 2006, to be effective as written
above.




KEYCORP




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	                       /s/ Thomas Helfrich
 	 
	 	 	Thomas Helfrich 	 
	 	 	Executive Vice President
Exhibit 10.19


 


FIFTH AMENDMENT
TO EQUITY RESIDENTIAL 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN


 


THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT (the “Fifth Amendment”)
to EQUITY RESIDENTIAL 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN (“Plan”) is executed as of the 1st
day of October, 2006.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of Equity
Residential (the “Company”) adopted the Plan on February 21, 2002, which
was approved by the shareholders of the Company at the 2002 annual meeting.


 


WHEREAS, the Company entered into a First
Amendment to the Plan dated as of February 7, 2003, a Second Amendment to
the Plan dated as of June 10, 2003, a Third Amendment to the Plan dated as
of April 25, 2005 and a Fourth Amendment to the Plan dated as of February 1,
2006.


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend
the Plan pursuant to this Fifth Amendment to make a minor modification to
ensure compliance with current stock option accounting rules.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is further amended as
follows:


 


1.                                       AMENDMENTS.
The first sentence of Section 13 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting
the word “may” in the seventh line thereof and replacing it with the word “shall”.


 


2.                                       PLAN
IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.  After
giving effect to this Fifth Amendment, the Plan remains in full force and
effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fifth Amendment has
been executed as of the date first written above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Bruce C. Strohm

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Bruce C. Strohm

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Executive Vice President and General
  Counsel
§ 1.6035-2 Transitional relief. ( a ) *Statements due before June 30, 2016.* Executors and other persons required to file or furnish a statement under section 6035(a)(1) or (2) after July 31, 2015 and before June 30, 2016, need not have done so until June 30, 2016.
( b ) *Applicability Date.* This section is applicable to executors and other persons who file a return required by section 6018(a) or (b) after July 31, 2015.
[T.D. 9797, 81 FR 86955, Dec. 2, 2016]
§ 1.1051-1 Basis of property acquired during affiliation. ( a ) ( 1 ) The basis of property acquired by a corporation during a period of affiliation from a corporation with which it was affiliated shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the corporation from which acquired. This rule is applicable if the basis of the property is material in determining tax liability for any year, whether a separate return or a consolidated return is made in respect of such year. For the purpose of this section, the term *period of affiliation* means the period during which such corporations were affiliated (determined in accordance with the law applicable thereto), but does not include any taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 1922, unless a consolidated return was made, nor any taxable year after the taxable year 1928.
( 2 ) The application of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph may be illustrated by the following example: Example: The X Corporation, the Y Corporation, and the Z Corporation were affiliated for the taxable year 1920. During that year the X Corporation transferred assets to the Y Corporation for $120,000 cash, and the Y Corporation in turn transferred the assets during the same year to the Z Corporation for $130,000 cash. The assets were acquired by the X Corporation in 1916 at a cost of $100,000. The basis of the assets in the hands of the Z Corporation is $100,000.
( b ) The basis of property acquired by a corporation during any period, in the taxable year 1929 or any subsequent taxable year, in respect of which a consolidated return was made or was required under the regulations governing the making of consolidated returns, shall be determined in accordance with such regulations. The basis in the case of property held by a corporation during any period, in the taxable year 1929 or any subsequent taxable year, in respect of which a consolidated return is made or is required under the regulations governing the making of consolidated returns, shall be adjusted in respect of any items relating to such period in accordance with such regulations.
( c ) Except as otherwise provided in the regulations promulgated under section 1502 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or the regulations under section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 or the Revenue Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 447), 1936 (49 Stat. 1652), 1934 (48 Stat. 683), 1932 (47 Stat. 169), or 1928 (45 Stat. 791), the basis of property after a consolidated return period shall be the same as the basis immediately prior to the close of such period.
<page>     EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  	/s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		  Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	  Chief Financial Officer

Date:		  May 17, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1420 Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal spectrum analyzer. ( a ) *Identification.* An electroencephalogram (EEG) signal spectrum analyzer is a device used to display the frequency content or power spectral density of the electroencephalogram (EEG) signal.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls).
[44 FR 51730, Sept. 4, 1979, as amended at 66 FR 46953, Sept. 10, 2001]
Exhibit 35.7



LOGO



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule Ihereto, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule Ihereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2017 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule Ihereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling
and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC,a Florida limited liability companyBy

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident






1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

CGCMT 2015-P1

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-P1,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1

Citibank,N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York, NY 10013

Cirino Emanuele

Citibank,N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York NY 10013

John Hannon

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich Street, 5th Floor

New York NY 10013

Paul Vanderslice

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich Street, 19th Floor

New York NY 10013

Richard Simpson

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich Street, 17th Floor

New York NY 10013

Ryan M. OConnor

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

Trust & Agency
Services

1761 E. Saint Andrew Place

Santa Ana CA 92705

James Noriega

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor

New York NY 10016

David Rodgers

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor

Att: CGCMT 2015-P1

New York NY 10016
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER DONNELL WILLIAMS
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3402

[ November 8, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Steven J. Levin , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2015CF000210A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Kime, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assis tant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

The defendant timely appeals his sentences for various drug possession charges. We agree with his assertion that the sentence imposed for c ount I exceeds the statutory maximum sentence. Thus, we reverse his sentence on that count only. We find the remainder of his arguments to be without merit or not preserved.

The def endant pled nolo contendere to c ount I, possession of twenty grams or less of cannabis, and c ount II, possession of ethylone, a

controlled substance. He was sentenced to four years in the custody of the Department of Corrections on each charge, which sentences were to be served concurrently. Williams then moved to correct a sentencing
error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), alleging in pertin ent part that the sentence for c ount I exceeded the statutory maximum of one year. In response, the state conceded that the sentence

for c ount I should not have exceeded one year, and the t rial court granted the motion as to this ground. However, as the state candidly concedes on appeal, it does not appear that an order was entered to

ac tually correct the sentence on c ount I.2 Possession of twenty grams or less of cannabis is a first

- degree misdemeanor. § 893.13(6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016). A first

- degree misdemeanor may be punished by a term of incarceration not exceeding one year. § 775.082(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016).

As both the state and the trial court recognized, the court erred in

en tering Williams’ four

- year sentence in excess of the statutory

maximum. We therefore reverse and remand for resentencing on c ount I. We affirm the sentence for the remaining count.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part

.

G ROSS
, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Marvin L. Waldron and Jean C. Waldron, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lissa Mae Waldron and Kathryn E. Snyder, Defendants-Appellees.

Gen. No. 68-23.

Third District.

March 4, 1969.

Winstein and Kavensky, of Rock Island, for appellants; H. Moss Meersman, of Moline, for appellees.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE STOUDER.

Not to be published in full.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

RALPH BOLDEN,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 348 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
was deprived of due process because he did not receive timely notice of the 

charges, he was not allowed to present witnesses, there was not some 

evidence to support the charges, the hearing officer was biased, and the 

sanctions amounted to cruel and unusual punishment. 2 

Appellant failed to demonstrate a violation of due process 

because he: (1) received advance written notice of the charges; (2) received 

a written statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for 

disciplinary action; and (3) was provided a qualified right to call witnesses 

and present evidence. 3 Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-69 (1974). 

Appellant failed to demonstrate that the hearing officer was not impartial. 

Some evidence supports the decision by the prison disciplinary hearing 

officer, Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985), and the sanctions 

2To the extent that appellant challenged his placement in 

disciplinary segregation, appellant's challenge was not cognizable in a 

petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Bowen v. Warden, 100 Nev. 489, 

490, 686 P.2d 250, 250 (1984); see also Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 

486 (1995) (holding that liberty interest protected by the Due Process 

Clause will generally be limited to freedom from restraint which imposes 

an atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the 

ordinary incidents of prison life). 

31n regards to the latter, appellant did not request specific witnesses 

at the preliminary inquiry, and the hearing officer stipulated to the 

substance of the testimony that would have been presented. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A cigDo 
imposed did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Accordingly, 

we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4 

Adam J. 

Pickering 

cOir , J. 

Parraguirre 

Saitta 

J. 

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge 

Brent Morris 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City District Attorney 

Carson City Clerk 

4We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0)1947A ew