alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133358 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan STEVEN PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133358 COA: 257577 Court of Claims: 01-018063-MT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 5, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

s0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit
        32 **CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc., a
        Nevada
        corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
        30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
        Gary M. De Laurentiis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Frederick
        Smith, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each
        hereby
        certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
        1350),
        that to his knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 November
                14, 2005
              
              
              /s/
                Gary M. De LaurentiisGary M. De LaurentiisChairman & Chief Executive
                Officer(Principal Executive
                Officer)November
                14, 2005
              
              
              /s/
                Frederick Smith, Jr.Frederick Smith, Jr.Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
                Officer)
 
 [A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Itec Environmental Group, Inc. and will be retained by Itec Environmental
        Group,
        Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000854941
<NAME>                        Elegant Illusions
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         2,037,350
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,945,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,203,283
<PP&E>                                         1,573,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                 704,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,155,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,301
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,434
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,868,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,155,364
<SALES>                                        1,907,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,907,399
<CGS>                                          579,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  579,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,187,908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                139,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                   55,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            83,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   83,861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.000
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: RELOCATION OF 

MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS 38-1-15 and 

38-2-09 AND CONSOLIDATION OF 

FACILITIES FOR MAGISTERIAL 

DISTRICTS 38-1-15, 38-1-16 and 38-2-

09 WITHIN THE THIRTY-EIGHTH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 411

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9

th day of February 2017, upon consideration of the Petition to 

Relocate Magisterial District Courts 38-1-15 and 38-2-09 and Consolidate Magisterial 

Districts 38-1-15, 38-1-16 and 38-2-09 of the Thirty-eighth Judicial District (Montgomery 

County) of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania into one facility located at 601 DeKalb 

Street, Norristown, PA it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is GRANTED, effective 

November 1, 2016.
NUMBER 13-19-00415-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

EDDIE GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellee's amended third motion for extension 

of time to file the brief. Appellee’s brief was originally due to be filed on August 31, 2020, 

and the Court previously granted appellee two extensions for the filing of appellee’s brief 

in this cause.
2

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellee's amended third motion 

for extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in this cause, 

is of the opinion exigent circumstances exist, and in the interest of justice, appellee’s

amended third motion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted. Accordingly, 

appellee’s amended third motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. The 

Court looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by counsel’s failure to have filed a brief 

in this matter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Honorable Luis A. Gonzalez, counsel for

appellee, file the appellate brief with this Court on or before March 1, 2021. No further 

motions to extend will be entertained.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P.47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

3rd day of December, 2020.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Advance Refunding and Debt Management

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance, 1815-					 and 	Eighty-Seventh Congress, 1961-1963. 						*Advance Refunding and Debt Management : Hearings Before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Eighty-Seventh Congress, Second Session, March 14 and 16, 1962*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										March 14 and 16, 1962,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/765,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 280 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 280

 Extending the provisions of Senate Resolution 149 of the One Hundred 
  Third Congress, First Session, relating to the Senate Arms Control 
                            Observer Group.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Extending the provisions of Senate Resolution 149 of the One Hundred 
  Third Congress, First Session, relating to the Senate Arms Control 
                            Observer Group.

    Resolved, That subsection (a) of the first section of Senate 
Resolution 149, agreed to October 5, 1993 (103d Congress, 1st Session) 
is amended by striking ``until December 31, 1994'' and inserting 
``until December 31, 1996''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 132 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 132

                   To amend paragraph 2 of rule XXV.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 15 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

 Mr. Ford (for Mr. Mitchell) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                   To amend paragraph 2 of rule XXV.

    Resolved, That paragraph 2 of Rule XXV of the Standing Rules of the 
Senate is amended for the One Hundred Third Congress as follows: strike 
``13'' after ``Governmental Affairs'' and insert in lieu thereof 
``14''.

                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 781 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the status 

of an independent contractor, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mr. FERGUSON (for himself, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. MIKE GARCIA of California, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. OWENS, Ms. 

HAGEMAN, Mr. COLE, and Mr. MCCLINTOCK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify 

the status of an independent contractor, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guaranteeing Inde5 pendent Growth Act’’ or the ‘‘GIG Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 781 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 

2 Section 3(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

3 (29 U.S.C. 203(e)) is amended by adding at the end the 

4 following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(6)(A) The term ‘employee’ does not include an indi6 vidual who performs services for another person as an 

7 independent contractor, as determined by the Secretary. 

8 In making such determination, the Secretary shall con9 sider that an individual is likely to be performing services 

10 for another person as an independent contractor if such 

11 individual— 

12 ‘‘(i) exercises substantial control over key as13 pects of the performance of such services; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) has the opportunity to earn profits or 

15 incur losses based on the exercise of initiative or 

16 management of investment by such individual. 

17 ‘‘(B) In any case in which the Secretary determines 

18 that the considerations described in subparagraph (A) are 

19 not dispositive as to whether an individual is performing 

20 services for another person as an independent contractor, 

21 the Secretary may also consider that the individual is like22 ly to be performing such services as an independent con23 tractor if such services— 

24 ‘‘(i) require specialized training or skills that 

25 such person does not provide; and 

26 ‘‘(ii) are performed— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 781 IH

1 ‘‘(I) on a continuous basis (including on a 

2 seasonal basis); and 

3 ‘‘(II) as part of an integrated unit. 

4 ‘‘(C) In making any determination under this para5 graph as to whether an individual is performing services 

6 for another person as an independent contractor, the Sec7 retary shall only consider actual practices between the in8 dividual and such person, without regard to— 

9 ‘‘(i) any contractual agreement or any other ex10 pectation of either party that is not regularly met in 

11 the course of performing such services; and 

12 ‘‘(ii) any services that the individual performs 

13 that— 

14 ‘‘(I) are not for such person; and 

15 ‘‘(II) are not substantially similar to the 

16 services that such individual performs for such 

17 person.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,477]

      ( print page 37737)    
Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on June 30, 2009 on behalf of workers of SER Enterprise/DHL Logistics, Ogden, Utah.

Petitions filed by a group of adversely affected workers must be signed by at least three workers. Since the petition did not include signatures by at least three workers, the petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of July 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-18061 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
### Pat McCrory Governor

Heather McTeerToney Regional Administrator USEPA Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 June 26, 2015 

### Donald 

### R. van der Vaart Secretary

Subject: Recession ofNorthCarolina's September 3, 2014, Withdrawal of2008 Ozone Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Certification Pertainingto Interstate Transport (Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)) DearMs. Toney: OnNovember 2, 2012, North Carolina submitted its certification demonstrating that the North Carolina Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources, Division ofAir Quality (NC DAQ) had met the requirements oftheCleanAir Act Section 110(a)(1) and (2) infrastructure State Implementation Plan for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. North Carolina's submittal demonstrated compliance with all requirements including the good neighbor provision. NCDAQ believes modelingperformed bythe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would have supported ourconclusion; however, that modeling was not yet available. Subsequently, in August 2014, EPA informed NC DAQ that it intended to disapprove this submittal because it did not include a modeling demonstration. Therefore, on September 3, 2014, North Carolina requested withdrawal ofthe Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)portion ofthe submittal pending availability ofEPA's modeling. OnJanuary 22, 2015, EPA'spreliminary air quality modeling results became available which supported NC DAQ'sNovember 2, 2012 submittal that demonstrated North Carolina does not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance ofthe standard in a neighboring state. Therefore, North Carolinabelieves it has met its obligations under Section 11O(a)(1) and (2) related to interstate transport. North Carolina rescinds its September 3, 2014, withdrawal and therefore, does not expect to receive a finding offailure to submit.

1641 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1641 Phone: 919-707-8400 I lnternei: www.ncdenr.gov An Equal Opportunity \Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part by recycled paperHeather McTeer Toney June 26,2015 Page2 Ifyou have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (919) 707-8430.

SCH/ssm

cc: Michael Abraczinskas, DAQ Sushma Masemore, DAQ Scott Davis, EPA Lynorae Benjamin, EPA Sincerely,

Sheila C. Holman Division ofAir Quality, NCDENR

Leslie Rhodes, Mecklenburg CountyAir Quality William Barnette, Forsyth County Office ofEnvironmental Assistance and Protection David Brigman, Western Regional Air Quality Agency
# FILED

March 6, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF A

PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE

RICKYE D. ANDERSON, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Rutherford Ch ancery No. 91DR- 506 ) VS. ) Appeal No . 01A01-9704-CH- 00186 ) L. LOIS ANDERSON, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. )

O R D E R

Appellant has filed a petition to rehear which, after due con sideration is

respectfully denied.

So ordered this _______ day of M arch, 1998.

HIGHERS, J.

FARMER, J.

TOMLIN, Sr. J.
# C_2016027EN.01005201.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/52

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2015 — Infusion Brands v OHIM (DUALTOOLS)

(Case T-648/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for the Community figurative mark DUALTOOLS - Absolute grounds for refusal - Partial refusal of registration - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 027/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Infusion Brands, Inc. (Myerlake Circle Clearwater, Florida, United States) (represented by: K. Piepenbrink, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by V. Melgar, and subsequently by H. O’Neill and M. Rajh, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 July 2014 (Case R 398/2014-4), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign DUALTOOLS as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Infusion Brands, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Infusion Brands, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Western Land and Recreation,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jay N. Torok, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                 
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Jay N. Torok                                                                
| |  |                                                                                 
| |  | Jay N. Torok
Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 14, 2003

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose. This certification is not being filed as part of this Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX

Mr. Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer California Air Resources Board Post Office Box 2815 Sacramento, California 95812 DearMr. Corey: 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA941 05-3901 

## JUL 062016

On June 9, 2016, CARB submitted a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed the materials submitted with the following document and found thattheyfulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V.

In the coming months we will review the complete revision foraction pursuantto Clean AirAct section 110(k). This addressesthe only revision in this submittal, although CARB also submitted a related PM10 plan forthe Owens Lake area underseparate cover letteron the same day. We will address completeness forthis othersubmittal separately. Questions regarding ourcompleteness review should be directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024. Sincerely, Elizabeth J. Adams Acting Director, Air Division Mr. Phill Kiddoo Air Pollution Control Officer Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief AirQuality Planning and Science Division CaliforniaAir Resources Board .~D S% 

# in’

~%L PRO~

Prinledo,, 10000 Postco,,su,,,er Recycled Pape,: Process chlorine Free.