alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Número Identificador

RES 20 2 4

_______________

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL

MILDRED DÍAZ CRUZ

Recurrida

v.

CASA DE BENDICIÓN Y RESTAURACIÓN JUNCOS INC., JERRY L. CASTRO LOZADA, MARÍA M. BORÍA DELGADO Y OTROS

Peticionarios KL CE20 2 400 7 63 Certiorari procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior d e Juncos

C aso Núm

. :
CG2024CV00697

Sal ón : 703

S obre:

Incumplimiento de Contrato, Cobro de Dinero

- Ordinario, Daños
Panel integrado por su president e , el J uez Rodríguez Casillas , el J uez Salgado Schwarz y el Juez Ronda Del Toro

. Salgado Schwarz, Carlos G., Juez Ponente



## RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 27 de agosto de 2024.

Comparece n los peticionarios de epígrafe, mediante

este recurso discrecional de Certiorari , y solicita

nuestra intervención a los fines de revocar una

Resolución emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia

dictada el 14 de mayo de 2024 y notificada al día

siguient e, mediante la cual se declaró No Ha Lugar una

Moción de Desestimación presentada por éstos alegando

que el TPI erró al sostener la validez de los

emplazamientos diligenciados por estos ser insuficientes

en derecho, y por concluir que el TPI adquirió

juris dicción sobre los Peticionarios.

Hemos deliberado los méritos del recurso y

concluimos no expedir el auto solicitado. A pesar de que

este Tribunal de Apelaciones no tiene que fundamentar suKLCE202 400 763 2

determinación al denegar un recurso de Certiorari , 1 en

ánimo de que no quede duda en la mente de las partes

sobre los fundamentos al denegar ejercer nuestra

facultad revisora, abundamos.

El TPI atendió el petitorio presentado por la

parte, y luego de examinado el expediente y las

argumentaciones vertidas, resolvió la misma

correctamente.
En consideración a lo anterior, y luego de evaluar

detenidamente el expediente ante nuestra consideración,

no encontramos indicio de que el foro recurrido haya

actuado de forma arbitraria, caprichosa, haya abusado al

ejercer su discreción, o cometido algún error de

derecho. Trans

- Oceanic Life Ins. v. Oracle Corp. , 184

DPR 689, 709 (2012).

Además, no identificamos fundamentos jurídicos que

nos muevan a expedir el auto de Certiorari solicitado,

conforme a los criterios que guían nuestra discreción

para ejerc er nuestra facultad revisora en este tipo de

recurso. Regla 40 del Reglamento del Tribunal de

Apelaciones, 4 LPRA Ap. XXII

- B, R. 40.

Por los fundamentos antes expresados, denegamos la

expedición del auto de Certiorari solicitado.

Lo acordó y manda el Tr ibunal, y lo certifica la

Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones.

Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Solís Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones

1 Véase: Pueblo v. Cardona López , 196 DPR 513 (2016)
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Principal Plus Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   May 15, 2008
(logo) Deutsche Bank

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel  714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2015-CCRE25

 

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:

 

A)     A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from August 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”) and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and

B)     That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator         

 

/s/ David Co

BY:  David Co

Title:  Director

Date:  March 1, 2016
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 223

To refer S. 2188 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation

in Canada for the proportionate share of tribal funds and annuities

under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United States,

and for other purposes’’, to the Chief Judge of the United States Court

of Federal Claims for a report on the bill.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. INOUYE (for himself and Mr. SIMON) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

OCTOBER 4 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 2188 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of the

Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the proportionate

share of tribal funds and annuities under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United States,

and for other purposes’’, to the Chief Judge of the

United States Court of Federal Claims for a report on

the bill.

1 Resolved, That S. 2188 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief

2 of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the propor-
2

•SRES 223 ATS

1 tionate share of tribal funds and annuities under treaties

2 between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United States,

3 and for other purposes’’, now pending in the Senate, to4 gether with all accompanying papers, is referred to the

5 Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

6 The Chief Judge shall proceed according to the provisions

7 of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code,

8 and report back to the Senate, at the earliest practicable

9 date, providing such findings of fact and conclusions that

10 are sufficient to inform the Congress of—

11 (1) whether the claims against the United

12 States of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada that

13 would have been compensable under the Indian

14 Claims Commission Act (25 U.S.C. 70 et seq.) but

15 for the residence of the Pottawatomi Nation in Can16 ada and outside of the territorial limits of the

17 United States are legal or equitable in nature;

18 (2) the amount of damages (if any) that the

19 Pottawatomi Nation in Canada would have been en20 titled to receive under such Act but for the residence

21 of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada and outside of

22 the territorial limits of the United States that is

23 payable to the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada in ac24 cordance with section 1(1) of S. 2188; and
3

•SRES 223 ATS

1 (3) the amount of interest that is payable on

2 the amount referred to in paragraph (2) in accord3 ance with section 1(2) of S. 2188, calculated at a

4 rate of 5 percent per year.

Æ
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00690- CR

Alm a Aboites-Ac osta, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 22ND J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. CR-09 -04 75, H ONO RAB LE CHARLES R. RAMSAY , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Alma Aboites-A co s t a h as filed a notice of appea l from a judgme nt of conviction for the offe nse of injury to a child. The district court imposed sentenc e on June 21, 2012, and Aboites-Ac osta timely filed a motion for new trial. Thus, the deadline for perf ecting the appea l
was September 19, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) (2). Aboites-Ac osta filed his notice of appea l on October

12, 2012. On Octobe r 18, Aboites-Ac osta also filed a motion for e x tension of time to file hi s notice of appea l, but the deadline for filing t hat m otion was October 4, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Absent a timely filed notice of appea l, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this appea l in any manner other than by dismiss ing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W .2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). We are also without jurisdiction to g rant a motion for extension of time that is filed more than fiftee n day s afte rthe date that the notice of appea l was due. See O livo , 918 S.W .2d 519. Acc ording ly , we de ny the motion for extension of tim e and dismiss the appe al for w ant of jurisdiction. 1

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Puryear , Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: January

9, 2013 Do Not Publish

The reme dy for a late-f

iled notice of appea l is to file a post-conv i ct i o n writ of habea s 1 corpus returna

ble to the Texas Court of Criminal Appea ls for consideration of an out-of-time appea l. SeeTex. Code Crim. P roc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012).

2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 215 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 215

 To authorize testimony and representation of a former employee of the 
      Senate in Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser Engineers Hanford Co.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 23 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony and representation of a former employee of the 
      Senate in Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser Engineers Hanford Co.

Whereas in the case of Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser Engineers Hanford Co., 
        Numbered 94-ERA-14, pending in the United States Department of Labor, 
        counsel for the complainant has requested deposition testimony from 
        Robert Alvarez, a former employee of the Senate on the staff of the 
        Committee on Governmental Affairs;
Whereas pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, sections 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2) of title 2, United States 
        Code, the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the 
        Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony 
        relating to their official responsibilities;
Whereas by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; 
        and
Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Robert Alvarez is authorized to testify in the case 
of Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser Engineers Hanford Co., and any related 
proceedings, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 
asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Robert Alvarez in connection with his testimony in Sonja I. Anderson v. 
Kaiser Engineers Hanford Co.

                                 <all>
```
#### Naylor, etc., et al. v. Baker’s Merchandise Co., Inc., et al.

*Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish*and *Green,*for plaintiffs.

*White, Williams & Scott,*for defendants.

June 2, 1953.

Bok, P. J.,

This is plaintiff’s petition for leave to photograph defendant’s truck that caused injuries to a four-year-old child.

The accident occurred in November 1951; suit was started in January 1953, and this petition was filed in April 1953, after the case was at issue.

The photographing of objects under the opposing party’s control is clearly allowed in Pa. R. C. P. 4009, and its relevance established if necessary to prove a prima facie case. The complaint alleges negligence through defective appliances and through failure of defendant’s driver to see the child, whom it is alleged he should have seen if he had been keeping a proper lookout.

The danger is, as defendant says in its brief, that the truck may not be in the same condition as it was at the time of the accident. It is also possible that hard use in the interim may have made it look more dilapidated now than then and hence prejudice the defendant with the jury. However, these are matters *530easily controllable by the trial judge at the trial. Allowing a petition like this does not guarantee the picture’s admission in evidence. To photograph and measure the truck now might preserve valuable evidence if it were to be sold, wrecked, or junked before the case is reached for trial.

The petition is granted.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as  Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,  as Trustee, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,  as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-CCRE26 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.     A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                         
<ARTICLE>                     5
                               
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999  
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                    601,903
<SECURITIES>                              127,798
<RECEIVABLES>                             165,437
<ALLOWANCES>                               42,902
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          926,945
<PP&E>                                    217,016
<DEPRECIATION>                             91,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,668,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     241,094
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                30,000
<COMMON>                                   10,421
<OTHER-SE>                              1,387,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,668,957
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          399,070
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           142,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       142,206
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              142,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.01
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for MAD 2015-11MD Mortgage Trust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 6, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

  

 

February 29, 2016

 

                                

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 /s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
|fc*2-l*f

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 14-13-00690-CR OFFENSE: Aggravated Robbery

STYLE: Cordero Jarreal Stevenson v The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 179th District Court

DATE: November 13, 2014 Publish: No TC CASE #:1299880

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Cordero Jarreal Stevenson v The State of Texas

CCA#_

APP&LL ANITAS Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

"^6ffcS6&3> JUDGE:

IfefS-ft

DATE: 03/ky/^iT

JUDGE: fili UiAM&tSIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE: -

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
NO. 07-03-0297 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L D SEPTE MBE R 29, 2003

______________________________ SHAW N O’CONNELL LEW IS, Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 10 8TH DIST RICT COURT OF POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 44,391-E; HON. RICHARD DAMBOLD, PRE SIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMP BELL, JJ. ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND Appellant Shaw n O’Connell Lewis appeals his conviction for the offense of driving
w hile intoxicated. The c lerk’s record is due in this cause, and an ex tension of the app licab le deadli ne was so ught. T o justify th e extension, the clerk represented that appellant faile d to pay o r m ake arra ngem ents topay fo r the record. No thing of re cord appears show ing whether the appellant is indigent and entitled to a free record.2

Accordingl y, we now

abate this appeal and reman d the cause to the108th Distri ct Court of Potter County

(trial court) for further proceedings. Upon rem and, th e trial court sha ll imm ediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determ ine the following: 1. whet her appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. whet her appellant is indigent; and 3. whether th e appellant i s en title d to a free appellate record and to appointe d counsel on ap peal due to his ind igency. The trial court

sha ll cause the hearing to be transc ribed. So too shall it 1) execute f indings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s recor d containi ng the findi ngs of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it ma y iss ue as a result of its hearing on this m atter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transc ribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforem entioned hearing. Additionally, the district c o urt shall then file the supplemental
rec ord w ith t he c lerk

of t his cour

t on or b efo re O cto ber

29, 200 3. S hou ld fu rt he r t i me be needed by the tr ial court toperform these tasks , then s am e m ust be request ed befor e October 29, 2003. Finally, should it be determined that appellant desires to prosecute this app eal, is indigent, and is entitled t o appointe d couns el but hasnone, t hen the trial court sha ll appoint counsel to appellant. The nam e, address phone num ber and state bar numbe r of the attorney appointed, if any, shall be included in the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law

. It is so ordered.3 Per Cu ri am
Do not publish.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 168

Authorizing the printing with illustrations of a document entitled ‘‘Committee

on Appropriations, United States Senate, 126th Anniversary, 1867–1993’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. BYRD (for himself and Mr. HATFIELD) submitted the following resolution

NOVEMBER 19 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing with illustrations of a document

entitled ‘‘Committee on Appropriations, United States

Senate, 126th Anniversary, 1867–1993’’.

1 Resolved, That there be printed with illustrations as

2 a Senate document a compilation of materials entitled

3 ‘‘Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate,

4 126th Anniversary, 1867–1993’’, and that there be

5 printed five thousand additional copies of such document

6 for the use of the Committee on Appropriations.

Æ