alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 1996 (Unaudited) and the
Statement of Income for the three months ended December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   600
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,242
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,842
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
SUMMARY MEMORANDUM OPINION; NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE 

OFFICIAL REPORTERS

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LARRY HODGE,

 Plaintiff, 

 v.

THE INVISIBLE EMPIRE, et al., 

 Defendants.

Civil Action No. 12-cv-1412 (RLW)

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

After dismissing Plaintiff Larry Hodge’s amended complaint for failing to satisfy FED. R.

CIV. P. 8(a) (Dkt. Nos. 10 & 11), Mr. Hodge now moves this Court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P.

60(b) to reconsider. (Dkt. No. 12). Rule 60(b)(1) provides grounds for relief to a party that 

identifies “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Mr. Hodge had two 

opportunities to ensure his complaint met the minimal pleading requirements of Rule 8(a), and 

failed to do so. Mr. Hodge now claims he has not been able to provide all documents in support 

of his claim “due to the press of other matters and personal obligations.” (Dkt. No. 12, at ¶ 3). 

But “[a] defeated litigant cannot set aside a judgment . . . because he failed to present . . . all of 

the facts known to him that might have been useful to the court.” Richardson v. National Rifle 

Ass’n, 879 F. Supp. 1, 2 (D.D.C. 1995) (quoting 11 Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, 

 1 This unpublished memorandum opinion is intended solely to inform the parties and any 

reviewing court of the basis for the instant ruling, or alternatively, to assist in any potential future 

analysis of the res judicata, law of the case, or preclusive effect of the ruling. The Court has 

designated this opinion as “not intended for publication,” but this Court cannot prevent or 

prohibit the publication of this opinion in the various and sundry electronic and legal databases 

(as it is a public document), and this Court cannot prevent or prohibit the citation of this opinion 

by counsel. Cf. Fed. R. App. P. 32.1. Nonetheless, as stated in the operational handbook 

adopted by our Court of Appeals, “counsel are reminded that the Court’s decision to issue an 

unpublished disposition means that the Court sees no precedential value in that disposition.” 

D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 43 (2011). 
SUMMARY MEMORANDUM OPINION; NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE 

OFFICIAL REPORTERS

2

FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 2858). Additionally, Mr. Hodge has still not provided 

any relevant evidence to establish the nature or basis of his initial claim. See Murray v. District 

of Columbia, 52 F.3d 353, 355 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (to obtain Rule 60(b) relief, “the movant must 

provide the district court with reason to believe that vacating the judgment will not be an empty 

exercise or a futile gesture”).

Accordingly, Mr. Hodge’s motion to reconsider will be DENIED. A separate Order 

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

SO ORDERED.

Date: January 11, 2013 

 ROBERT L. WILKINS

United States District Judge
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 13

Condemning the violence committed in Brookline, Massachusetts, on

December 30, 1994.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1995

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mrs. SCHROEDER,

and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the violence committed in Brookline,

Massachusetts, on December 30, 1994.

Whereas on Friday, December 30, 1994, a tragic crime was

committed in Brookline, Massachusetts, when a gunman

entered 2 separate clinics in the same neighborhood and

opened fire, killing 2 persons and seriously wounding 5

others;

Whereas every responsible individual, elected official, and

community and religious leader respects the right of

peaceful protest, but is opposed to threats, harassment,

intimidation, and violence;

Whereas terrorist acts are a violation of the principles of free

society; and
2

•HCON 13 IH

Whereas the One Hundred Third Congress recognized the

need to assure our citizens of the right to peaceful access

to clinics by enacting the Freedom of Access to Clinic

Entrances Act of 1994: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress condemns the violence

3 committed in Brookline, Massachusetts, on December 30,

4 1994, and all other acts of violence, including threats and

5 harassment, which are intended to intimidate law abiding

6 citizens from engaging in lawful acts.

7 SEC. 2. The Congress calls upon Federal law enforce8 ment officials to act swiftly and decisively to protect clinics

9 from such acts of terror by fully cooperating with local

10 law enforcement officials, by thoroughly investigating

11 threats and acts of violence, and by prosecuting those who

12 commit such vile acts to the full extent of the law.

Æ
#### § 1.6411-4 Consolidated groups.

For further rules applicable to consolidated groups, see § 1.1502-78. For further rules applicable to consolidated groups that include insolvent financial institutions, see § 301.6402-7 of this chapter.

[T.D. 8446, 57 FR 53034, Nov. 6, 1992]
JohnNypl 

16325 State Hwy. 49 

Grass Valley, CA 95949 

October 7, 2014 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Room 2Wl000 

Case No. 2010WP250060 

I am requesting a hearing for a case no. 201 OWP250060. 

JohnNypl 

10/07/2014
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,888]


Camcar LLC--Rochester Operations, DBA Acument Global 
Technologies--Rochester Operations, Rochester, IN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on June 3, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Camcar 
LLC--Rochester Operations, dba Acument Global Technologies, Rochester 
Operations, Rochester, Indiana.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an existing 
certification (TA-W-70,260L) filed on May 20, 2009. The determination 
date of the existing certification is July 1, 2009. Consequently, 
further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of July 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18052 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         100,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      479
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40
<INVENTORY>                                      2,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,094
<PP&E>                                          44,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,946
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,256
<SALES>                                          1,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,307
<CGS>                                            2,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,402<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (26)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,091)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES are for R&D incurred in developing product for market
</FN>


</TABLE>
Making Healthy Food Choices 

Focus on fruits 

• Eat a variety of fruit everyday. 

• Fruit can be fresh, frozen, canned, or dried. 

• Too much fruit juice can add lots of unnecessary 

sugar to your diet. Limit fruit juice to one serving 

per day. 

• One serving of fruit equals 1 medium piece of 

fruit, 1⁄2 cup cut fruit, 1⁄4 cup dried fruit, or 3⁄4 cup 100% juice. 

Vary your veggies 

• Eat more dark green veggies, such as broccoli and kale. 

• Eat more orange veggies, such as carrots, sweet potatoes, pumpkin, 

and winter squash. 

• Eat more beans and peas, such as pinto beans, 

kidney beans, black beans, garbanzo beans, split 

peas, and lentils. 

• One serving of veggies equals 1 cup raw leafy 

greens; 1⁄2 cup chopped, cooked or raw 

vegetables; or 1⁄2 cup 100% vegetable juice. 

Get calcium-rich foods 

• Every day, get 3 cups of lowfat or fat-free milk – or

an equivalent amount of low-fat yogurt 

(1 cup yogurt) and/or low-fat cheese 

(1 1⁄2 ounces of cheese equals 1 cup of milk). 

Page 1 of 2

S06 Version 3.0 

www.move.va.gov

• If you don’t or can’t drink milk, choose lactose-free 

milk products and/or calcium-fortified foods and 

beverages.
Make at least half your grains “whole grains” 

• Eat at least 3 ounces of whole grains everyday. 

• One ounce is 1 slice of bread, 1 cup of breakfast 

cereal, or 1⁄2 cup of cooked rice or pasta. 

• Look to see that grains such as wheat, rice, oats, 

or corn are referred to as “whole” in the list of 

ingredients. 

Go lean with protein 

• Choose lean meats and poultry. 

• Bake, broil or grill meat, poultry and fish. 

• Vary your protein choices – with fish, beans, 

peas, nuts, and seeds. 

• One serving of meat, poultry or seafood is 

2-3 ounces, about the size of a deck of cards. 

For beans or peas, 1⁄2 cup is a serving, and for 

nuts and seeds, 1⁄4 cup is a serving. 

Know the limits on fats, salt, sugars, and alcohol 

• Read the Nutrition Facts label on foods. 

• Look for foods low in saturated fats and trans fats. 

• Choose and prepare foods and beverages with little 

salt (sodium) and/or added sugars (caloric 

sweeteners like sucrose or high fructose cornsyrup).

• Limit alcohol. It just adds empty calories. 

• All foods can be enjoyed in moderation once you know the limits.

Page 2 of 2

S06 Version 3.0 

www.move.va.gov
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ IN RE : No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 1 92

- C V § LUIS FERNANDO AMAYA , R elator. § § § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDI NG

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Luis Fernando Amaya , filed a mandamus petition against the Honorable Annabel Perez, Judge of the 41st District Court of El Paso County, Texas. Relator asks that we order Respondent to set aside her order granting a new trial for the real party in interest, Hernandez Reliable Roofing. The petition for writ of man damus is denied. Generally, mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or to compel the performance of a ministerial duty, and where the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Reece , 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 (Tex. 2011) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Insurance Company of America , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

- 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). The burden is on relator to show it is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Company , 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005) (ori g. proceeding); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Mandamus review is not available for an order that sets aside a default judgment whe n there has been no jury trial. See In re Dio gu, No. 14

- 16

- 00373

- CV, 2016 WL- 2

-

3131524, at *1 (Tex.App.

-- Houston [14th Dist.] June 2, 2016, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.) ; In re Abrokwa , No. 05

- 15

- 01239

- CV, 2015 WL 6520083, at *1 (Tex.App.

-- Dallas Oct. 28, 2015, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.); In re Procesos Especializados en Metal, S.A. de C.V

. , No. 04

- 14

- 00543

- CV, 2014 WL 4347724, at *3 (Tex.App.

-- San Antonio Sept. 3, 2014, orig. proceeding ) (mem. op.)

. Acc ordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice November 19 , 2018 Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated  unaudited financial statements of Lahaina  Acquisitions,  Inc. for
the nine-month  period ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such consolidated unaudited financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000855684
<NAME>                        LAHAINA ACQUISITIONS INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                         514,572
<SECURITIES>                                   126,607
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         221,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,217,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,182,864
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (168,141)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,217,502
<SALES>                                        3,750,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,503,618
<CGS>                                          693,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,723,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (485,094)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             573,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                997,585
<INCOME-TAX>                                   262,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   735,085
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04




</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 104

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two houses.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 104

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, September 29, 1995, it stand ad4 journed until 10 a.m. on Friday, October 6, 1995, or until

5 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas6 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

7 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

8 or adjourns on any day beginning with Friday, September

9 29, 1995, through Friday, October 6, 1995, pursuant to
2

•HCON 104 EH

1 a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee in

2 accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or ad3 journed until noon on Tuesday, October 10, 1995, or until

4 such time on that day as may be specified by the Majority

5 Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn,

6 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified

7 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res8 olution, whichever occurs first.

9 Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

10 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

11 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead12 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

13 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

14 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives September 29,

1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
## THE STATE OF TEXAS MANDATE

TO THE CRIMINAL DIST RICT COURT NO. 2 OF DALLAS COUNTY OF DAL LAS COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 13th day of March, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Juan Flores

- Alonzo, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 14

- 00055

- CR

Trial Court No. F

- 1260857

- I

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect the appellant’s plea of no contest to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Juan Flores

- Alonzo, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this t he 12th day of May , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Clerk
III

Calendar No. 465

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 225

Relating to the purchase of calendars.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. FORD, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

RESOLUTION

Relating to the purchase of calendars.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration is authorized to expend from the contingent fund

3 of the Senate, upon vouchers approved by the chairman

4 of that committee, not to exceed $79,040 for the purchase

5 of one hundred and four thousand 1995 ‘‘We The People’’

6 calendars. The calendars shall be distributed as prescribed

7 by the committee.
Calendar No. 465

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 225

RESOLUTION

Relating to the purchase of calendars.

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Placed on the Calendar