alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 281

To authorize testimony by an employee of the Senate and to authorize

representation by the Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony by an employee of the Senate and

to authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of

the Committee on Governmental Affairs has been conducting an investigation into the management and operations of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurance

network;

Whereas a law enforcement entity has requested testimony

from Alan Edelman, counsel to the Subcommittee, about

the Subcommittee’s investigation;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken
2

SRES 281 ATS

from such control or possession but by permission of the

Senate;

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges

of the Senate; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to requests

for testimony made to them in their official capacities:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Alan Edelman, and any other sub2 committee staff from whom testimony may be necessary,

3 are authorized to provide testimony about the subcommit4 tee’s investigation into the management and operations of

5 the Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurance network, sought

6 in conjunction with law enforcement investigations or re7 lated proceedings, except concerning matters for which a

8 privilege should be asserted.

9 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to

10 represent employees of the Senate in connection with the

11 testimony authorized by section 1 of this resolution.

Æ
# Jornal Oficial L 272/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0774 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | L 272 |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Legislação | 63.° ano19 de agosto de 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0774

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

L 272

Edição em língua portuguesa

Legislação

63.° ano19 de agosto de 2020

---

| Índice | | Retificações | Página |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Retificação da Aprovação definitiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 do orçamento retificativo n.o 4 da União Europeia para o exercício de 2020 ( JO L 254 de 4.8.2020 ) | 1 |

Índice

Retificações

Página

*

Retificação da Aprovação definitiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 do orçamento retificativo n.o 4 da União Europeia para o exercício de 2020 ( JO L 254 de 4.8.2020 )

o

( JO L 254 de 4.8.2020 )

1

| PT | Os actos cujos títulos são impressos em tipo fino são actos de gestão corrente adoptados no âmbito da política agrícola e que têm, em geral, um período de validade limitado.
  Os actos cujos títulos são impressos em tipo negro e precedidos de um asterisco são todos os restantes. |
| --- | --- |

PT

Os actos cujos títulos são impressos em tipo fino são actos de gestão corrente adoptados no âmbito da política agrícola e que têm, em geral, um período de validade limitado.

Os actos cujos títulos são impressos em tipo negro e precedidos de um asterisco são todos os restantes.

---

Retificações

| 19.8.2020 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | L 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2020

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

L 272/1

---

Retificação da Aprovação definitiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 do orçamento retificativo n.o 4 da União Europeia para o exercício de 2020

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» L 254 de 4 de agosto de 2020
  )

Na página 36, na linha «Totais», na coluna «Orçamento 2020 — Pagamentos»:

em vez de:

«

  167 248 223 575
  »,

deve ler-se:

«
  150 948 403 832
  ».

Na página 36, na linha «Totais», na coluna «Novo montante — Pagamentos»:

em vez de:

«
  167 520 721 783
  »,

deve ler-se:

«
  151 220 902 040
  ».

---
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 268

To refer S. 890 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Matt Clawson.’’ to the

chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for a report

thereon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. CRAIG submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 890 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Matt Clawson.’’ to the chief judge of the United States Court

of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

1 Resolved, That the bill S. 890 entitled ‘‘A bill for the

2 relief of Matt Clawson.’’ now pending in the Senate, to3 gether with all the accompanying papers, is referred to

4 the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal

5 Claims. The chief judge shall proceed with the same in

6 accordance with the provisions of sections 1492 and 2509

7 of title 28, United States Code, and report thereon to the

8 Senate, at the earliest practicable date, giving such find9 ings of fact and conclusions thereon as shall be sufficient
2

•SRES 268 IS

1 to inform the Congress of the nature and character of the

2 demand as a claim, legal or equitable, against the United

3 States or a gratuity and the amount, if any, legally or

4 equitably due to the claimants from the United States. In

5 complying with this resolution, the United States Court

6 of Federal Claims is requested to consider the records of

7 any previous trial of the issues in this case, including the

8 records of Mathew Clawson v. United States (24 Cl. Ct.

9 366; 1991).

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on form 10-QSB of Edd Helms Group, Inc.
and Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the quarter ended February 28, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the company.

Date: December 14, 2005                     /s/  W. Edd Helms, Jr.
      -----------------                     ----------------------
                                            W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief
                                            Executive Officer and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
        



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and use of our
report, dated November 1, 1996, on the consolidated financial statements of
Damen Financial Corporation which appears in Damen Financial Corporation's
Annual Report of Shareholders and Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
1996 in Damen Financial Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-4091 and No. 333-4095).
        



                                        Cobitz, VandenBerg & Fennessy 


Hickory Hills, Illinois 
December 27, 1996
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 62 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 62

 To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the 
   name of the Senate in Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., et al. v. 
   Federal Communications Commission, et al. and consolidated cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 3 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the 
   name of the Senate in Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., et al. v. 
   Federal Communications Commission, et al. and consolidated cases.

Whereas, in the case of Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., et al. v. Federal 
        Communications Commission, et al., No. 92-2247, and consolidated cases 
        Nos. 92-2292, 92-2494, 92-2495, 92-2558, pending before a three-judge 
        court of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 
        the plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of sections 4 and 5 
        of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, 
        Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460, 1471-81, which require cable 
        operators to carry the signals of certain local commercial and 
        noncommercial educational television stations; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(c), 706(a), and 713(a) of the Ethics in 
        Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(c), 288e(a), and 288l(a) (1988), 
        the Senate may direct its Counsel to appear as amicus curiae in the name 
        of the Senate in any legal action in which the powers and 
        responsibilities of Congress under the Constitution are placed in issue: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to appear as 
amicus curiae on behalf of the Senate in Turner Broadcasting System, 
Inc., et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, et al., and 
consolidated cases in support of the constitutionality of sections 4 
and 5 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act 
of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102-385, 106 Stat. 1460, 1471-81.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMERISOURCE
HEALTH CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          57,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  340,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,292
<INVENTORY>                                    547,837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               948,519
<PP&E>                                          80,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,014,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          621,249
<BONDS>                                        509,155
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           255
<OTHER-SE>                                   (124,142)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,014,586
<SALES>                                      1,282,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,282,513
<CGS>                                        1,212,788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,212,788
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (145)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
Order entered May 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01127-CR

RUBEN LORENZO PAZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-53572-U

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s May 20, 2015 second motion for extension of time to 

file the State’s Brief and the May 20, 2015 motion for leave to file brief exceeding word limit.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signature: Project No.: 0 317.0 2 .005.510 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR20 1 3 

### CBI?

Yes

No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D

Incoming

Outgoing Date: 11/14 /1 4 Time: 2 :00 am

pm

Company Name: Montana DEQ ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Bartell

Contact Name: Gina Self Contact Phone Number: ( 406) 444

- 0574

General Subject: 2013 DMR Arsenic Discharges for Decker Coal Co in Decker, MT



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Tom Reid: 406

- 444

- 5329

, toreid@state.mt.us (supervisor in the water quality discharge permits section)

Gina Self: 406

- 444

- 0574

On November 14 th , I called Mr. Reid and left a message.

On November 25 th , I called Mr. Reid and left a message.

On November 26 th , Gina Self returned my call and confirmed the arsenic discharges and flow values for the

facility. We are missing a BDL indicator for the Dec 2013 arsenic discharges.

Outfall 002

12/31/13: Flow = 1.83 MGD

Arsenic Concentration = <5 mg/L
# Uradni list L 281/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0804 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | L 281 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Zakonodaja | Letnik 6328. avgust 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0804

Uradni list

Evropske unije

L 281

Slovenska izdaja

Zakonodaja

Letnik 6328. avgust 2020

---

| Vsebina | | II   Nezakonodajni akti | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | MEDNARODNI SPORAZUMI |
| | * | Obvestilo o začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma o prenehanju veljavnosti bilateralnih investicijskih pogodb med državami članicami Evropske unije | 1 |

Vsebina

II   Nezakonodajni akti

Stran

MEDNARODNI SPORAZUMI

*

Obvestilo o začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma o prenehanju veljavnosti bilateralnih investicijskih pogodb med državami članicami Evropske unije

1

| SL | Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.
  Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica. |
| --- | --- |

SL

Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.

Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica.

---

II Nezakonodajni akti

MEDNARODNI SPORAZUMI

| 28.8.2020 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | L 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2020

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

L 281/1

---

Obvestilo o začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma o prenehanju veljavnosti bilateralnih investicijskih pogodb med državami članicami Evropske unije

Sporazum o prenehanju veljavnosti bilateralnih investicijskih pogodb med državami članicami Evropske unije, podpisan v Bruslju 5. maja 2020
   (1), bo v skladu s členom 16(1) začel veljati 29. avgusta 2020.

1

---

(1)  
  UL L 169, 29.5.2020.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30

TINA DELL'AQUILA
HAND DELIVERED
Wednesday, February 21, 2007

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL: TINA DELL'AQUILA

Dear Tina

Further to our recent discussions I am pleased to be able to confirm to you in
writing the following changes to your compensation while you undertake the Chief
Financial Officer position on an interim basis.

<TABLE>
<S>               <C>
JOB TITLE:        Interim Chief Financial Officer

EFFECTIVE DATE:   December 1, 2006

PREMIUM:          You will receive an additional premium payment of $6,250 per
                  month for 7 months after which time it will be reviewed.
                  Your salary will be adjusted in February as part of our annual
                  merit process.

CAR ALLOWANCE:    Your car allowance will be changed from $13,500 to $16,000
                  per year.

BONUS:            Your bonus  percentage will be increased to 100% of your base
                  salary for 7 months after which time it will be reviewed.

TERMINATION:      In the event that your employment is terminated by Cott for
                  any reason other than just cause, Cott will provide you with a
                  severance package equal to 24 months base salary (excluding
                  premium identified above), bonus guaranteed at 100% targeted
                  payout (for further clarification bonus target for termination
                  purposes is 65% of annual base salary), car allowance and
                  benefits (excluding long and short term disability coverage
                  and out-of country benefits). This payment will be inclusive
                  of any amounts to which you would otherwise be entitled at law
                  and no other compensation or payments will be made to you in
                  such events. In addition, the payment will be subject to you
                  signing a release in form and content satisfactory to Cott at
                  such time.
</TABLE>

All other existing terms and conditions remain the same.

Tina, thank you for all of your hard work and commitment to Cott and please
contact me if you have any questions.

Yours sincerely

/s/ Abilio Gonzalez
-------------------------------------
Abilio Gonzalez
Chief People Officer

                 I agree and accept the above amendments terms.


Signature: /s/ Tina Dell'Aquila                     Dated: February 21, 2007
           -----------------------                         ------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6035
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BERNARD GIBSON, SR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:94- cr-00454-PJM-2; 8:05-cv-01437-PJM) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 10, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Gibson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bernard Gibson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to amend his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and the court’s order denying his motion to reconsider. The district court found that there was no pending § 2255 motion to amend and that, in any event, Gibson’s motions were tantamount to a successive § 2255 motion, for which Gibson had not obtained authorization to file. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit ju stice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal- 3 - contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00220

- CV

IN RE JOY'E HUDSON

Original Proceeding

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- 1911

- 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed on September 3 , 2021, is denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed September 15 , 2021

[OT06]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**ABDUR RAHEEM MUHAMMAD,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**ARTHUR CARL SCHWOTZER; GREGG**

**A. SCHWOTZER AND THE ESTATE OF GREGG A. SCHWOTZER (DECEASED);**  **W. REID HOWE; RYAN SCHWOTZER; DAMIAN WINCHEL; ANNA MASON;**  **JINADA ROCHELLE; CHRISTINE E. RICE; JOANN L. EDWARDS; STEPHEN** 
**A. GLASSMAN; ARBERDELLA WHITE DAVIS; JAMES D. HOLT; HOMER C.**  **FLOYD; TOM CORBETT; EDWARD G. RENDELL; CROSSGATES** 

**MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED D/B/A SWISSVALE TOWERS ASSOCIATION;** 

**PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION; PENNSYLVANIA** 

**HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 8 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal** 

**is** DISMISSED **. See Pa.R.A.P. 1112(a), (b).**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.** **[8 EAL 2016] - 2**