alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.26


 


 


November 14, 2002


 


Judith Rodin, PhD.


President


University of
Pennsylvania


100 College Hall


Philadelphia, PA   19104


 


Dear Judith:


 


This will confirm
the following agreement relating to the deferral of your directors’ fees and
retainers in 2003:


 


1.                                       All
directors’ fees and retainers (“Fees”) 
payable to you in connection with your service on the boards of
directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, will
be deferred and paid to you in accordance with this letter agreement:


 


2.                                       Fees
will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Directors’
Stock Equivalent Purchase Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A
(the “Plan”).


 


3.                                       Upon
your retirement from the Board of Directors of AMR the Stock Equivalent Units
accrued pursuant to the Plan will be converted to cash and paid to you by
multiplying the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of the date of your
retirement by the arithmetic mean of the high and low of AMR stock (“fair
market value”) during the calendar month immediately preceding such retirement
date.  Such payment will occur within 30
days of your retirement date.


 


4.                                       AMR’s
obligation to make payments pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof will not be released
or modified by reason of your death.  In
such event, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of death will
be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the calendar month
immediately preceding your death, and the amount paid to the Trustees under
your Revocable Agreement of Trust, dated September 15, 1997, as amended
November 3, 1997, Judith Rodin Settlor and Trustee.


 

















 


If the foregoing
is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the originals (two
are enclosed) and returning it to me.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Charles D. MarLett

  
	
   

  	
  Corporate Secretary

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted and agreed:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Judith Rodin

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Judith Rodin

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  11/20/02

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  
				



 


2
#### § 1.544-2 Constructive ownership by reason of indirect ownership.

The following example illustrates the application of section 544(a)(1), relating to constructive ownership by reason of indirect ownership:

# Example.

A and B, two individuals, are the exclusive and equal beneficiaries of a trust or estate which owns the entire capital stock of the M Corporation. The M Corporation in turn owns the entire capital stock of the N Corporation. Under such circumstances the entire capital stock of both the M Corporation and the N Corporation shall be considered as being owned equally by A and B as the individuals owning the beneficial interest therein.
RECEI\11=0 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEC 1 1 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS HEARING DOCf\ET 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In The Matter Of: 

Michelle Kraemer, 

Respondent. 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2441 

Case No. 2015-WA-91-0066 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

December 10, 2015 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Notice is hereby given that Brian K. Khan of the Federal Aviation 

Administration, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018, will appear as counsel 

of record on behalf of the Administrator, in the above-captioned matter. Briana Martino 

is no longer an attorney of record in this matter. Please serve any future documents to the 

attention of Brian K. Khan. 

Dated: December 10,2015. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

11/k--~~~ BriailK. Khan, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, Midwest Team 

2300 E. Devon Ave. 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 
Email: brian.k.khan@faa.gov 

Telephone: (847) 294-7313 (main) 

(847) 294-7652(direct) 

(847) 294-7498 (fax) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that I have, this date, served the foregoing Notice of Appearance to the 

following via Overnight Mail: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearing, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. Brian J. Lawler, Esq. 

Pilot Law, P.C. 

1551 9th Avenue 

San Diego, California 92101 

Dated this lO'h day of December 2015. 

Brian K. Khan, Esq.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 3

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 5, 1993

Mr. MITCHELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That the hour of daily meeting of the Sen2 ate be 12 o’clock meridian unless otherwise ordered.

Æ
39424.

#### CITY OF CARTERSVILLE v. SLOAN *et al.*

Decided April 3, 1962

Rehearing denied April 17, 1962.

*Henson, Greene & Greene, Wm. B. Greene,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. C. Pittman, Pittman & Crowe,*contra.

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

Where a municipal corporation petitioned to condemn described real property pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 36-11 of the Code as amended, and alleged that some or all of the owners of the property were unknown and that their places of residence were unknown, and prayed that service on such unknown owners be had under the provisions of Chapter 36-3; and, where it appears from the record that service was in fact perfected on such nonresident owners in accordance with the provisions of that chapter, and an award of the assessors and a final judgment of condemnation was duly entered, a motion subsequently filed at the same term of court by persons alleging themselves to be the sole owners of the property sought to be condemned, which motion alleges that movants were not served and had no notice of the proceeding; that the movants are all of the owners of the property sought to be condemned, and that movants “now appear and ask to have another assessment in said case so that they may have their day in court,” states grounds for the relief prayed for under the provisions of *Code*§ 36-310, and a general demurrer to that motion was properly overruled by the judge of the superior court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
#### § 1.461-3 Prepaid interest. [Reserved]
610 P.2d 1044

#### Timothy L. MALUMPHY, Petitioner, v. Ellis MacDOUGALL, Director, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

No. M-192-2.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

March 26, 1980.

Rehearing Denied May 13, 1980.

Timothy L. Malumphy, in pro. per.

Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Jay R. Adkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, a prisoner at the state prison, sought relief by special action to require the Director of the Department of Corrections to comply with the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act, A.R.S. § 41-1001 et seq., by filing with the Secretary of State certain rules and regulations governing inmate custody criteria.

The Director of Corrections states in his response that the regulations in question have not been filed with the Secretary of State because the regulations are merely statements "concerning only the internal management of the agency and exempt from the requirement for filing. A.R.S. § 41-1001(7).

We accepted jurisdiction and grant the relief sought.

Since *Thomas v. Arizona State Board of Pardons and Paroles,*115 Ariz. 128, 564 P.2d 79 (1977) we have indicated the necessity for the Department of Corrections to file its rules and regulations as required by the Administrative Procedures Act. In *Brown v. State,*117 Ariz. 476, 573 P.2d 876 (1978) we again noted that the Department of Corrections was under a legal obligation to file its regulations prescribing its policies and practices.

The Department’s regulations dealing with classifications which affect the various levels of custody of prisoners is not merely an internal matter. The regulations in fact prescribe policy and set forth procedures and practices of the agency. Additionally, the unfiled regulations materially affect the type of existence a sentenced prisoner will endure, which ranges from “intensive” custody, twenty-four-hour lockup, to “trusty.” Regulations of this type which affect such important interests are the type of regulations which must be filed with the Secretary of State.

The Director of Corrections shall file the regulations in question with the Secretary of State as required by law or, pursuant to A.R.S. § 41 — 1004, the regulations remain without force or effect.

STRUCKMEYER, C. J., HOLOHAN, V. C. J., and HAYS, CAMERON and GORDON, JJ., concur.
Port/Terminal :

Our Reference :

Drawn By :

Representing :

Date Sample Taken :

Date Submitted :

Date Tested :

Sample Designated As :

Client Reference :

Test Method Units

API Gravity @ 60°F ASTM D4052 Deg. API

Sulfur ASTM D4294 % Wt.

Flash Point ASTM D93B Deg. °F

Viscosity, Kin @ 122°F ASTM D445 cSt

Viscosity, Say @ 122°F ASTM D2161 SFS

Heat of Combustion ASTM D240 BTU / Pound

Heat of Combustion ASTM D240 BTU / Gallon

Sediment & Water ASTM D1796 % Vol.

Ash Content ASTM D482 % Wt.

Nitrogen ASTM D5762 % Wt.

Vanadium ASTM D5863B PPM

Sodium ASTM D5863B PPM

Ultimate Analysis ASTM D5291

Carbon ASTM D5291 %Wt

Hydrogen ASTM D5291 %Wt

18481

166.2

14.5

Submitted Sample

Tank Sample

July 30, 2009

Results

351.41

0.926

200+

Report of Analysis

Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant, MA

29-000609

July 31, 2009

TBN

July 31, 2009

#6 Fuel Oil

0.026

149160

0

Syed Naqvi

Laboratory Manager

Intertek Caleb Brett

T: 203-467-3471 F: 203-467-8083

7

New Haven, CT 06512

11.15

0.26

26

88.09

481A East ShorePkwy
#### § 1.652(a)-2 Distributions in excess of distributable net income.

If the amount of income required to be distributed currently to beneficiaries exceeds the distributable net income of the trust (as defined in section 643(a)), each beneficiary includes in his gross income an amount equivalent to his proportionate share of such distributable net income. Thus, if beneficiary A is to receive two-thirds of the trust income and B is to receive one-third, and the income required to be distributed currently is $99,000, A will receive $66,000 and B, $33,000. However, if the distributable net income, as determined under section 643(a) is only $90,000, A will include two-thirds ($60,000) of that sum in his gross income, and B will include one-third ($30,000) in his gross income. See §§ 1.652(b)-1 and 1.652(b)-2, however, for amounts which are not includible in the gross income of a beneficiary because of their tax-exempt character.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

967 TP 11-00463 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN JONES, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (SUSAN K. JONES OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered March 2, 2011) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 256

To authorize the use of funds available to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources for consultants.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 19 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. JOHNSTON (for himself and Mr. WALLOP) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Committee discharged

RESOLUTION

To authorize the use of funds available to the Committee

on Energy and Natural Resources for consultants.

1 Resolved, That section 9(c) of the Omnibus Commit2 tee Funding Resolution for 1993 and 1994 (S. Res. 71;

3 103d Congress, 1st Session) is amended by adding before

4 the period the following: ‘‘of which amount not to exceed

5 $100,000 may be expended for the procurement of the

6 services of individual consultants, or organizations thereof

7 (as authorized by section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorga8 nization Act of 1946, as amended)’’.

Æ
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 231

To recognize persons dedicated to improving voter participation, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. WOFFORD (for himself and Mr. SIMPSON) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To recognize persons dedicated to improving voter

participation, and for other purposes.

Whereas on June 21, 1964, James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner gave their lives at a young

age in an effort to guarantee the rights that are the

birthright of every citizen of the United States, particularly the right to vote;

Whereas James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael

Schwerner were part of a movement that helped to

achieve the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the

Voting Rights Act of 1965, and other milestones in the

progress of this Nation toward achieving the goal of ensuring equal rights, equal opportunities, and equal justice

for all;
2

SRES 231 ATS

Whereas during the 30 years after the deaths of James

Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner, this

Nation has benefited tremendously from the removal of

many barriers to full participation by every citizen of this

Nation in political, educational, and economic life;

Whereas the lives and deaths of James Chaney, Andrew

Goodman, and Michael Schwerner have come to symbolize the dream of brotherhood among citizens of this Nation from all races, religions, and ethnic backgrounds and

serve to inspire all citizens—in particular young citizens—to be dedicated to the ideals of justice, equality

citizenship, and community;

Whereas the lifework of these men and thousands of other

young students who participated in the Freedom Summer

remains unfinished until all barriers are removed that bar

the full participation of every citizen of this Nation in the

democratic process of this Nation, especially the electoral

process; and

Whereas the Nation continues to need the leadership and involvement of all its citizens, in particular the young, in

solving problems in their communities and improving the

lives of those in need: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) June 21, 1994, is designated as Freedom

3 Summer Day;

4 (2) the Senate expresses the importance of citi5 zens—regardless of party, ideology, age, race, creed,

6 and socioeconomic status—working to improve this

7 Nation and address issues most critical to their com8 munities;
3

SRES 231 ATS

1 (3) it is the sense of the Senate that the Voting

2 Rights Act of 1965 has helped to fulfill the promise

3 of democracy in this Nation; and

4 (4) the Senate reaffirms the goal of removing

5 remaining barriers to full voter participation in this

6 Nation.

Æ
#### Mary J. Krejpcio et al. *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Hartford et al.

*William C. Bieluch,*with whom was *Alfred V. Covello,*for the appellees (plaintiffs).

*Russell L. Post,*for the appellants (defendants Humble Oil and Refining Company et al.).

*Joseph J. Burns,*assistant corporation counsel, for the appellant (named defendant).

Argued November 5

decided November 5, 1963

The motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 80 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 80

 To designate the week of April 17-24, 1994, as ``Nancy Moore Thurmond 
           National Organ and Tissue Donor Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 1993

   Mr. Dole (for himself, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Biden, Mr. 
 Hatch, Mr. Nunn, Mr. Warner, Mr. Pressler, and Mr. Akaka) introduced 
the following joint resolution; which was read twice, considered, read 
                       the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the week of April 17-24, 1994, as ``Nancy Moore Thurmond 
           National Organ and Tissue Donor Awareness Week''.

Whereas Nancy Moore Thurmond was suddenly taken from us in the prime of her 
        life;
Whereas in an attempt to honor those causes for which Nancy Moore Thurmond was 
        associated, namely the championing of children's causes;
Whereas a new patient is added to the national patient waiting list for an organ 
        transplant every twenty minutes;
Whereas thousands of lives are saved or significantly improved annually by organ 
        and tissue transplantation; and
Whereas increasing the number of organs which can be transplanted as well as 
        tissues would save American taxpayers millions of dollars: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of April 17-24, 
1994, is designated ``Nancy Moore Thurmond National Organ and Tissue 
Donor Awareness Week'', and the President is authorized and requested 
to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe such week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and 
activities.

                                 <all>
```
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommie Mitchell, Otherwise Called Michael P. Lee, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 52,970.

First District, Second Division.

February 18, 1969.

*216Paul J. Galanti, of Chicago, for appellant;

John J. Stamos, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane, James Veldman, and Edward Stasukaitis, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by PRESIDING JUSTICE LYONS. Not to be published in full.
exv10w26



 






Exhibit 10.26




AMENDMENT NO. 7

TO

CNF INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR EXECUTIVES




1998 RESTATEMENT




     The 1998 Restatement of the CNF Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives (“Plan”), is
amended as follows, pursuant to Section 11.2:



     The 2005 and 2006 portions of the Value Management Awards that were subject to deferral
elections made in December of 2002 and December of 2003 for cycles that end on December 31, 2005
and December 31, 2006 are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. In order to comply
with Section 409A, the following new Section 14.17 is added immediately following Section 14.16:



          14.17 The 2005 and 2006 portions of the Value Management Awards that were subject to
deferral elections made in December of 2002 and December of 2003 for cycles that end on
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2006 shall not be governed by this Plan, but shall be
governed by the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives.








	 	 	 	 	 
	     
           Company

	 	CNF INC.               	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By: 	/s/ Eberhard G.H. Schmoller	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name of Signer: Eberhard G.H. Schmoller	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Date Signed: December 13, 2004
#### Robert W. Millette *v.*Frederick G. Reincke, Warden, Connecticut State Prison

Argued February 6

decided February 6, 1968

Submitted January 26

decided February 6, 1968

*Thomas F. Wall,*state’s attorney, for the appellee (defendant).

*Arnold II. Klau,*special public defender, for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Arnold II. Klau,*in support of the motion.

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted unless the plaintiff files his brief on or before March 15, 1968.

The motion by the plaintiff to have the appellant’s brief in the case of *Gould*v. *Reincke,*155 Conn. 703, 236 A.2d 916, treated as his brief in his appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Edd Helms Group, Inc.
and Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, W. Edd Helms, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
   the company.

Date: October 22, 2007      /s/  W. Edd Helms, Jr.
      ----------------      ----------------------
                            W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief
                            Executive Officer

      October 22, 2007      /s/  Dean A. Goodson
      ----------------      --------------------
                            Dean A. Goodson, Chief Financial Officer

      October 22, 2007      /s/  L. Wade Helms
      ----------------      ------------------
                           L. Wade Helms, Executive Vice President