alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,198]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on May 19, 2009 by a State of Maine Workforce Office representative on behalf of workers of United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry, August, Maine.

The petitioner has requested that the petition is withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of July 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-18045 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-1, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,657
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  77,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               79,398
<PP&E>                                         3,139,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,508,225)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 710,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,501
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     702,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   710,817
<SALES>                                        76,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               76,885
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41,465<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            16,661
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   16,661
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon Street  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNRPartners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee,and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C32 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of theMaster Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31,2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement duringsuch period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 135189 & (42) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135189 COA: 272142 Monroe CC: 05-034907-FC BILLY JOE RICE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 13, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED.

d0114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2008

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-497]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Hearing on the Department of Justice's Actions Related to the New 
Black Panther Party Litigation and Its Enforcement of Section 11(b) of 
the Voting Rights Act

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Friday, February 12, 2010; 9:30 a.m. EST.

Place:  U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 
540, Washington, DC 20425.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given pursuant to the provisions of the Civil 
Rights Commission Amendments Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. 1975a, and 45 CFR 
702.3, that public hearings before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 
will commence on Friday, February 12, 2010, beginning at 9:30 a.m. EST 
in Washington, DC at the Commission's offices located at 624 Ninth 
Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425. An executive session not 
open to the public may be convened at any appropriate time before or 
during the hearing.
    The purpose of this hearing is to collect information within the 
jurisdiction of the Commission, under 42 U.S.C. 1975a, related 
particularly to the Department of Justice's actions in the New Black 
Panther Party Litigation and enforcement of Section 11(b) of the Voting 
Rights Act.
    The Commission is authorized to hold hearings and to issue 
subpoenas for the production of documents and the attendance of 
witnesses pursuant to 45 CFR 701.2. The Commission is an independent 
bipartisan, fact finding agency authorized to study, collect, and 
disseminate information, and to appraise the laws and policies of the 
Federal Government, and to study and collect information with respect 
to discrimination or denials of equal protection of the laws under the 
Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or 
national origin, or in the administration of justice. The Commission 
has broad authority to investigate allegations of voting irregularities 
even when alleged abuses do not involve discrimination.

Contact Person For Further Information: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the scheduled date of the hearing at 202-376-
8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

    Dated: January 8, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-497 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 10444 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Oscar Fierro**

**- Alvarado,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 276

- 4

Before **Wiener, Dennis,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Oscar Fierro

- Alvarado pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute and was sentenced to 235 months of imprisonment and four years of supervised release. On appeal, he challenges conditions of supervised release numbers four and eight imposed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 15, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-10444 Document: 00516357657 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2022No. 20

- 10444

2 in the written judgment, arguing that there is a conflict between the oral pronouncement and the written judgment. The challenged conditions require Fierro

- Alvarado to “ support [his] dependents and meet other family responsi bilities ” and to “ not frequent places where controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed, or administered .” T he Government has filed a motion to reform the judgment to omit the challenged conditions and affirm. Alternatively, the Government requests an extension of time to file
its brief.

Inclusion of the two challenged condition s in the written judgment conflicts with the oral pronouncement of sentence. See United States v. Diggles , 957 F.3d 551, 559

- 63 & n.5 (5th Cir.) (en banc) , cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 825 (2020); United States v. Mireles , 471 F.3d 551, 558 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, Fierro

- Alvarado ’s sentence is **VACATED** in part and
**REMANDED** to the district court to amend the written judgment to

remove conditions four and e ight

. In all other respects, the judgment is
**AFFIRMED**

. The Government’s motion to reform the judgment or, alternatively, to extend the time to file a brief is **DENIED as MOOT** 

. Case: 20-10444 Document: 00516357657 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2022
#### City of Seymour *v.*Jordan et al.

[No. 21,375.

Filed October 14, 1909.]

From Jackson Circuit Court; *Joseph H. Shea,*Judge.

Petition by Elton S. Jordan and another for reassessment on account of street improvements, by the City of Seymour. From a judgment for petitioners, the City of Seymour appeals.

*Dismissed.*

*John H. Kamman,*for appellant.

*XJ. F. Lewis,*for appellees.

Hablet, J.

Appellees, in accordance with the provisions of section 111 of the act of 1905 (Acts 1905, p. 219, §8716 Burns 1908), concerning municipal corporations, secured a reduction of assessments against their real estate for the construction of a sewer. Appellant, by this appeal, seeks to challenge the power of the special commission, appointed by the circuit court, to change said assessments from the amounts fixed by the board of public works.

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction in this court.

The questions presented are, in principle, the same as those involved in *Randolph*v. *City of Indianapolis*(1909), 172 Ind. 510, and upon the authority of that case the appeal herein is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           22834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   562502
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                585336
<PP&E>                                         4373040
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2246752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10904833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           220768
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         11662
<OTHER-SE>                                    10548735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10904833
<SALES>                                          69749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 69749
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   768056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 230476
<INCOME-TAX>                                     73000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             157476
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    157476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
§ 1.410(a)-6 Amendment of break in service rules; Transition period. ( a ) *In general.* Under section 1017(f) (1) of the Employee retirement Income Security Act of 1974, a plan is not a qualified plan (and a trust forming a part of such plan is not a qualified trust) if the rules of the plan relating to breaks in service are amended, and— ( 1 ) Such amendment is effective after January 1, 1974, and before the date on which section 410 becomes applicable to the plan, and
( 2 ) Under such amendment, any employee's participation in the plan commences at any date later than the later of— ( i ) The date on which his participation would commence under the break in service rules of section 410(a)(5), or
( ii ) The earliest date on which his participation would commence under the plan as in effect on or after January 1, 1974.
( b ) *Break in service rules.* For purposes of paragraph (a), the term “break in service rules” means the rules provided by a plan relating to circumstances under which a period of an employee's service or plan participation is disregarded for purposes of determining his rights to participate in the plan, if under such rules such service is disregarded by reason of the employee's failure to complete a required period of service within a specified period of time.
(Sec. 410 (88 Stat. 898; 26 U.S.C. 410))
[T.D. 7508, 42 FR 47197, Sept. 20, 1977; 43 FR 2721, Jan. 19, 1978]
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 259

Commending the President and the special delegation to Haiti, and supporting

the United States Armed Forces in Haiti.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending the President and the special delegation to

Haiti, and supporting the United States Armed Forces

in Haiti.

Whereas the special delegation sent to Haiti on September

17, 1994, has succeeded in convincing the de facto authorities in Haiti to agree to leave power;

Whereas on September 18, 1994, after an agreement was

reached in Port-au-Prince that day, the President ordered the present deployment of men and women of the

United States Armed Forces in and around Haiti;

Whereas U.S. and multilateral sanctions have imposed a

heavy burden on the Haitian people; and
2

SRES 259 ATS

Whereas the Congress and the people of the United States

have great pride in the men and women of the United

States Armed forces and fully support them in all their

efforts overseas, including those in Haiti: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) commends the efforts of the President in

3 sending former President Jimmy Carter, retired

4 General Colin Powell and Senator Sam Nunn to

5 Haiti in an effort to avoid the loss of American lives;

6 (2) fully supports the men and women of the

7 United States Armed Forces in Haiti who are per8 forming with professional excellence and dedicated

9 patriotism;

10 (3) supports the departure from power of the

11 de facto authorities in Haiti, and Haitian efforts to

12 achieve national reconciliation, democracy, and the

13 rule of law;

14 (4) supports lifting without delay of U.S. uni15 lateral economic sanctions on Haiti, and lifting with16 out delay of economic sanctions imposed pursuant to

17 U.N. resolutions in accordance with such resolutions;

18 and
3

SRES 259 ATS

1 (5) supports a prompt and orderly withdrawal

2 of all United States Armed Forces from Haiti as

3 soon as possible.

Æ
§ 1.615-7 Effect of transfer of mineral property. ( a ) *Transfer before election by transferor.* ( 1 ) If mineral property is transferred in a transaction as a result of which the basis of the property in the hands of the transferee is determined in whole or in part by reference to the basis in the hands of the transferor and the transferor had not made an election under either section 615(e) or 617(a) at the time of the transfer, no election made by the transferor after the transfer shall apply with respect to expenditures properly chargeable to the transferred property which were paid or incurred before the date of the transfer.
( 2 ) For purposes of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, a transferor of mineral property who made an election under section 617(a) or section 615(e) before the transfer but who revokes such election after such transfer and does not make an election under either section before the expiration of the 3-year period prescribed by section 6072 or other provision of law for filing his income tax return for the taxable year in which such transfer occurred shall be treated with respect to such property as not having made an election under either section.
( b ) *Transfer after election by transferor.* If a transferee who at the time of the transfer of a mineral property has not made an election under section 617(a) receives property in a transaction in which the basis of such property in his hands is determined in whole or in part by reference to its basis in the hands of the transferor and with respect to such property the transferor has deducted expenditures under section 617(a), the adjusted exploration expenditures properly chargeable to the property immediately after the transfer shall be treated as expenditures allowed as deductions under section 617(a) to the transferee. See section 617 and the regulations thereunder.
( c ) *Transfer after election by transferee.* ( 1 ) If a transferee who makes an election under section 617(a) receives before January 1, 1970, mineral property in a transaction in which the basis of such property in his hands is determined in whole or in part by reference to the basis of the property in the hands of the transferor and the transferor had in effect at the time of the transfer an election under section 615(e), an amount equal to the total of the amounts allowed as deductions to the transferor under section 615 with respect to the transferred mineral property shall be treated as expenditures allowed as deductions under section 617(a) to the transferee. The preceding sentence shall not apply to expenditures which would not have been reflected in the basis of the property in the hands of the transferor had the transferor not made the section 615(e) election.
( 2 ) Any expenditures with respect to the transferred property deferred by the transferor under section 615(b) which are not allowed as deductions to him prior to transfer of the property may not be deducted by the transferee and in his hands shall be charged to capital account.
[T.D. 7192, 37 FR 12940, June 30, 1972]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robin Raina, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of Ebix, Inc. (the
Registrant).

(2) In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Report containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented.



By:

/s/ Robin RainaName:

Robin RainaChief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2012