alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.61-3 Gross income derived from business. ( a ) *In general.* In a manufacturing, merchandising, or mining business, “gross income” means the total sales, less the cost of goods sold, plus any income from investments and from incidental or outside operations or sources. Gross income is determined without subtraction of depletion allowances based on a percentage of income to the extent that it exceeds cost depletion which may be required to be included in the amount of inventoriable costs as provided in § 1.471-11 and without subtraction of selling expenses, losses or other items not ordinarily used in computing costs of goods sold or amounts which are of a type for which a deduction would be disallowed under section 162 (c), (f), or (g) in the case of a business expense. The cost of goods sold should be determined in accordance with the method of accounting consistently used by the taxpayer. Thus, for example, an amount cannot be taken into account in the computation of cost of goods sold any earlier than the taxable year in which economic performance occurs with respect to the amount (see § 1.446-1(c)(1)(ii)).
( b ) *State contracts.* The profit from a contract with a State or political subdivision thereof must be included in gross income. If warrants are issued by a city, town, or other political subdivision of a State, and are accepted by the contractor in payment for public work done, the fair market value of such warrants should be returned as income. If, upon conversion of the warrants into cash, the contractor does not receive and cannot recover the full value of the warrants so returned, he may deduct any loss sustained from his gross income for the year in which the warrants are so converted. If, however, he realizes more than the value of the warrants so returned, he must include the excess in his gross income for the year in which realized.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11402, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7207, 37 FR 20767, Oct. 5, 1972; T.D. 7285, 38 FR 26184, Sept. 19, 1973; T.D. 8408, 57 FR 12419, Apr. 10, 1992]
Order entered July 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00283-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF LOLA CHENOWITH, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. Pr-12-00202-2

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s July 10, 2013 second motion to extend time to file 

appellant’s brief, which is unopposed. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant 

to file her brief by July 25, 2013. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of 

exceptional circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2014431EN.01004001.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/40

---

Action brought on 8 October 2014 — Bonney v OHIM — Bruno (ATHEIST)

(Case T-714/14)

(2014/C 431/63)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: David Bonney (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vanessa Bruno (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ATHEIST’ — Application for registration No 1 0 0 34  874

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2014 in Case R 803/2013-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject the opposition insofar as it concerns goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition insofar as it concerns goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
427 A.2d 1211

#### Commonwealth ex rel., Newton v. Newton. Appeal of Joan W. Newton.

Submitted June 29, 1979.

Donald H. Lipson, for appellant;

James B. Martin, for appellee.

Before HESTER, HOFFMAN and CATANIA, JJ.*

*

 President Judge Francis J. Catania of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.

Order affirmed.
Visual Observation

Onslow County will conduct flight operations with no less than three personal on the ground observing at all times. These individuals will consist of; Pilot In Charge, Ground observer, and Safety manager.

These flight operations will take place in areas clear of obstructions to all ground personnel and the UAS. The safety manager on site will be equipped with a two way communication radio and briefed on all emergency phone numbers and frequencies for the local area. (Gaurd and local towers)

The PIC will conduct flight operations using an Apple iPad attached to the remote for maximum view area. All flight data is available to the PIC on the Apple iPad screen. This data includes altitude, direction of UAS, real time map location and real time high definition video.

Other observers will assist from no less than .05 miles away from PIC. They may utilize binoculars to better track and detect air traffic. These observers will also help to maintain a clear airspace by looking for other potential aircraft in the area or obstructions that may hinder flight operations. All observers and PIC will have cell phones on person and essential emergency numbers at their disposal.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 133

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 133

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the cal3 endar day of Tuesday, January 9, 1996, it stand ad4 journed until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 22, 1996, or

5 until noon on the second day after Members are notified

6 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res7 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

8 recesses or adjourns on the calendar day of Wednesday,

9 January 10, 1996, pursuant to a motion offered by the
2

•HCON 133 EH

1 Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or ad2 journed until noon on Monday, January 22, 1996, or until

3 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas4 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

5 whichever occurs first.

6 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

7 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

8 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead9 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

10 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

11 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives January 9

(legislative day, January 5), 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 281 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 281

 To authorize testimony by an employee of the Senate and to authorize 
              representation by the Senate Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony by an employee of the Senate and to authorize 
              representation by the Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Governmental Affairs has been conducting an investigation into the 
        management and operations of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurance 
        network;
Whereas a law enforcement entity has requested testimony from Alan Edelman, 
        counsel to the Subcommittee, about the Subcommittee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to 
        requests for testimony made to them in their official capacities: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Alan Edelman, and any other subcommittee staff from 
whom testimony may be necessary, are authorized to provide testimony 
about the subcommittee's investigation into the management and 
operations of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurance network, sought 
in conjunction with law enforcement investigations or related 
proceedings, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be 
asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
employees of the Senate in connection with the testimony authorized by 
section 1 of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers


Process for Requesting a Variance From Vegetation Standards for 
Levees and Floodwalls

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the February 9, 2010 issue of the Federal Register (75 FR 
6364), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), published its proposed 
update to its current process for requesting a variance from vegetation 
standards for levees and floodwalls for public comment. In that notice, 
the Corps stated that written comments must be submitted on or before 
March 11, 2010. Instructions for submitting comments are provided in 
the February 9, 2010, Federal Register notice. In response to several 
requests, the Corps has decided to extend the public comment period to 
April 25, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas J. Wade, Headquarters, 
Engineering and Construction Community of Practice, Washington, DC, at 
202-761-4668.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

    Dated: March 5, 2010.
John W. Hunter,
Engineering and Construction, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers.
[FR Doc. 2010-5126 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
§ 1.6015-4 Equitable relief. ( a ) A requesting spouse who files a joint return for which a liability remains unpaid and who does not qualify for full relief under § 1.6015-2 or 1.6015-3 may request equitable relief under this section. The Internal Revenue Service has the discretion to grant equitable relief from joint and several liability to a requesting spouse when, considering all of the facts and circumstances, it would be inequitable to hold the requesting spouse jointly and severally liable.
( b ) This section may not be used to circumvent the limitation of § 1.6015-3(c)(1) (i.e., no refunds under § 1.6015-3). Therefore, relief is not available under this section to obtain a refund of liabilities already paid, for which the requesting spouse would otherwise qualify for relief under § 1.6015-3.
( c ) For guidance concerning the criteria to be used in determining whether it is inequitable to hold a requesting spouse jointly and severally liable under this section, see Rev. Proc. 2000-15 (2000-1 C.B. 447), or other guidance published by the Treasury and IRS (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter).
[T.D. 9003, 67 FR 47285, July 18, 2002]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18596]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission Nominations

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office (GAO).

ACTION: Notice on letters of nomination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 
2009 (CHIPRA) established the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access 
Commission (MACPAC) to review Medicaid and CHIP access and payment 
policies and to advise Congress on issues affecting Medicaid and CHIP. 
CHIPRA gave the Comptroller General of the United States responsibility 
for appointing MACPAC's 17 members, with initial appointments to be 
made not later than January 1, 2010. For these appointments, I am 
announcing the following: Letters of nomination and resumes will be 
accepted through October 1st, 2009 to ensure adequate opportunity for 
review and consideration of nominees prior to appointment of members.

ADDRESSES: GAO: 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20548 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0bdb1b3a0b1b39180809f999e849d959e8483b097919fde979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="024f43415243416372726d6b6c766f676c76714265636d2c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: GAO: Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800, 
Public Law 111-3, Section 506; 42 U.S.C. 1396.

Gene L. Dodaro,
Acting Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. E9-18596 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for
        the
        period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock, Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 **/s/
                    THOMAS A. MURDOCK**Thomas
                    A. MurdockChief
                    Executive Officer
 
 Dated
        May
        15, 2007
#### §§ 1.475(a)-1-1.475(a)-2 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 154 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 154

    To welcome the holding of democratic elections in Pakistan, to 
   congratulate Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the occasion of her 
                  swearing-in, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 21 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

    Mr. Pell (for himself, Mr. Helms, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Brown) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

             October 26 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To welcome the holding of democratic elections in Pakistan, to 
   congratulate Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the occasion of her 
                  swearing-in, and for other purposes.

Whereas the United States and Pakistan have maintained close and cooperative 
        relations over many years;
Whereas the United States has a strong interest in strengthening democracy and 
        human rights in Pakistan;
Whereas Pakistan held elections for the National and Provincial Assemblies on 
        October 6 and 9, 1993, respectively;
Whereas the elections were observed by independent domestic monitors and by an 
        international delegation organized by the National Democratic Institute 
        for International Affairs (NDI);
Whereas the NDI delegation reported that ``the balloting was generally open, 
        orderly and well-administered,'' that ``election officials generally 
        carried out their tasks impartially and with diligence,'' and that the 
        announcement of results ``generally proceeded in accordance with the 
        law;''
Whereas the people of the United States enjoy an abiding friendship with the 
        people of Pakistan; and
Whereas the United States and Pakistan share a common interest in the promotion 
        of stability in Pakistan and the easing of tensions in the South Asia 
        region: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) welcomes the holding of elections on October 6 and 9, 
        1993, in Pakistan as an important step toward reaffirming 
        Pakistan's democratic course;
            (2) congratulates Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the 
        occasion of her swearing-in on October 19, 1993;
            (3) reaffirms the existing ties of friendship between the 
        peoples of Pakistan and the United States; and
            (4) underscores the continuing interest of the United 
        States in working with the government of Pakistan on issues of 
        bilateral and regional concern.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 1.215-1T Alimony, etc., payments (temporary).

Q-1 What information is required by the Internal Revenue Service when an alimony or separate maintenance payment is claimed as a deduction by a payor?

A-1 The payor spouse must include on his/her first filed return of tax (Form 1040) for the taxable year in which the payment is made the payee's social security number, which the payee is required to furnish to the payor. For penalties applicable to a payor spouse who fails to include such information on his/her return of tax or to a payee spouse who fails to furnish his/her social security number to the payor spouse, see section 6676.

(98 Stat. 798, 26 U.S.C. 1041(d)(4); 98 Stat. 802, 26 U.S.C. 152(e)(2)(A); 98 Stat. 800, 26 U.S.C. 215(c); 68A Stat. 917, 26 U.S.C. 7805)

[T.D. 7973, 49 FR 34458, Aug. 31, 1984]
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 26

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require a three-fifths vote

to overturn the chair post-cloture.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require a

three-fifths vote to overturn the chair post-cloture.

1 Resolved, That rule XXII of the Standing Rules of

2 the Senate is amended by striking the ‘‘.’’ at the end of

3 paragraph 3 of section 2 and inserting in lieu thereof the

4 following: ‘‘, such appeals shall require an affirmative vote

5 of three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn—

6 except on a measure or motion to amend the Senate rules,

7 in which case the necessary affirmative vote shall be two8 thirds of the Senators present and voting.’’.

Æ
#### Ruth Kekac *v.*The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company

*Ruth Kekac,*pro se, in support of the motion.

Submitted July 19

decided July 25, 1963

The motion by the plaintiff seeking correction of the record on appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County, and other relief, is denied.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 204

Relating to the retirement of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the United

States Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 19 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to the retirement of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary

of the United States Senate.

Whereas the Senate has been advised of the retirement of its

Secretary, Walter J. Stewart, on April 14, 1994; and

Whereas Walter J. Stewart has served the Senate with distinction for thirty-eight years, the last seven of which

were as Secretary of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That, effective April 15, 1994, as a token

2 of the appreciation of the Senate for his long and faithful

3 service, Walter J. Stewart is hereby designated as Sec4 retary Emeritus of the United States Senate.

Æ
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF DALLAS COUNTY OF DALLAS 

COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 13th 

day of March, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Juan Flores-Alonzo, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00055-CR

Trial Court No. F-1260857-I

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect the 

appellant’s plea of no contest to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child. As modified, 

the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Juan Flores-Alonzo, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 12th day of May, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk