alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 80 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 80

To replace the membership of the Select Committee on Ethics with former 
    Members selected by the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 16 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

Mr. Simon submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To replace the membership of the Select Committee on Ethics with former 
    Members selected by the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader.

    Resolved, That (a) subsection (a) of the first section of Senate 
Resolution 338, agreed to July 24, 1964, is amended to read as follows: 
``(a) there is hereby established a permanent select committee of the 
Senate to be known as the Select Committee on Ethics (referred to 
hereinafter as the `Select Committee') consisting of 6 former Members 
of the Senate, of whom 3 shall be selected by the Majority Leader and 3 
shall be selected by the Minority Leader. The Select Committee shall 
select a chair and a vice chair from among its members. Members of the 
Select Committee shall be entitled to a per diem of $400 plus travel 
expenses while serving on the Select Committee.''.
    (b) Subsection (e) of the first section of Senate Resolution 338, 
agreed to July 24, 1964, is repealed.
    (c) The amendments made by this resolution shall take effect on May 
1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18493]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel. Preparation and Distribution of Research Drug 
Products (N01DA-10-7772).
    Date: August 25, 2009.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 Research Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20850.
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401. (301) 435-1439. Lf33c.nih.gov.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 28, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-18493 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form
10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,581
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       190,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (192,285)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,581
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,471)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.5225 Powered patient rotation bed. ( a ) *Identification.* A powered patient rotation bed is a device that turns a patient who is restricted to a reclining position. It is intended for medical purposes to treat or prevent bedsores, to treat severe and extensive burns, urinary tract blockage, and to aid circulation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 890.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 59231, Nov. 3, 1998]
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned President &Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,that to their knowledge:

 

1)                                                     theCompany’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78*o*(d)); and

 

2)                                                     theinformation contained in the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Martin J.  Reid                     |                     | /s/William  J. Schmidt |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|
| Martin J.  Reid                        | William J.  Schmidt      |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                                   |                     |
|                                   |                     |
| Date:  July 8, 2008               | Date:  July 8, 2008 |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6573

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GAIL JEAN SMALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CR-96-154, CA-00-460-3-1-MU)

Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gail Jean Small, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Small’s claim that her sentence is not proper in light of

the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),

is without merit. We recently held in United States v. Sanders,

247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir. 2001), that the new rule announced in

Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral

review.

2

PER CURIAM:

Gail Jean Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order and

judgment denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the

reasoning of the district court.* See United States v. Small, Nos.

CR-96-154; CA-00-460-3-1-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Jan. 4, 2001; entered

Jan. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-1568[1].txt

From: Rick Counihan <RCounihan@enernoc.com> 

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Rick Counihan <RCounihan@enernoc.com> 

Date: 01/14/2013 07:28 AM 

Subject: RE: reporting cost

Hi Melanie, 

This accurately characterizes our conversation. 

Rick Counihan – Vice President Government Affairs 

EnerNOC, Inc. | 717 Kennebec Ave. | Takoma Park MD 20912 

415.517.1861 

rcounihan@enernoc.com www.enernoc.com 

EnerNOC - get more from energy 

From: King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 7:43 PM 

To: Rick Counihan 

Subject: reporting cost 

Hi Rick, 

Does this accurately describe our discussion yesterday regarding the burden of 

reporting 

information on the dates and times of operation for emergency demand response? 

In the first year of implementation, you estimate a burden of approximately 1/2 of 

an FTE at 

a cost of $60,000. In subsequent years, you estimate a burden of approximately 1/8 

of an 

FTE per year at a cost of $15,000 per year. 

Regarding the total number of CSPs, a listing on PJM's website shows about 70 

companies, 

and there may be about 30 more operating outside PJM. Not all are active and not all

have 

stationary engines in their portfolio. You are not sure of the number of active CSPs

nationwide with engines, but think about 70 might be a good estimate. 

These numbers are just a quick, back of the envelope, estimate provided to EPA on 

short 

notice, and are not exact. 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

This email and any information disclosed in connection herewith, whether written or 

oral, is the property of 

EnerNOC, Inc. and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 

addressed. This email may contain 

Page 1
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-1568[1].txt

information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.

Distributing or copying any 

information contained in this email to anyone other than the intended recipient is 

strictly prohibited. 

Page 2
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

 

CORNERSTONE REALTY INCOME TRUST, INC.

 

1992 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN 

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2002

 

This FIRST AMENDMENT is dated as of May 25, 2004, to the Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc. 1992 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan amended and restatedeffective July 1, 2002 (the “Plan”) by Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc. (the “Company”). 

 

The Company maintains the Plan. The Company’s Board of Directors has the authority under Plan Section 13 to amend the Plan and now wishes to do so. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 

 

I. Plan Section 10 is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:

 

10. **Termination.**The Plan shall terminate upon theearlier of: 

 

(a) the adoption of a resolutionof the Board terminating the Plan; or 

 

(b)July 1, 2012. 

 

No termination of the Plan shall without hisconsent materially and aversely affect any of the rights or obligations of any person under any Option previously granted under the Plan. 

 

II. This Amendment shall be effective as of May 25, 2004. 

 

III. In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

 

To record the adoption of the Amendment as set forth above, the Company has caused this document to be signed as of the 25th day of May, 2004.
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, William J. Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer,certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ibis TechnologyCorporation;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:

a)             designed such disclosure controlsand procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)             all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 15, 2006 | /s/William J. Schmidt   |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | William J. Schmidt      |   |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 282

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Office of Senate Fair

Employment Practices, and to authorize the Office of the Sergeant at

Arms of the United States Senate to intervene and be represented by

its counsel of choice in Rhonda Farmer v. Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices, No. 94–6005 (Fed. Cir.).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Office

of Senate Fair Employment Practices, and to authorize

the Office of the Sergeant at Arms of the United States

Senate to intervene and be represented by its counsel

of choice in Rhonda Farmer v. Office of Senate Fair

Employment Practices, No. 94–6005 (Fed. Cir.).

Whereas, in the case of Rhonda Farmer v. Office of Senate

Fair Employment Practices, No. 94–6005, pending in the

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,

the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices is the

respondent in a proceeding under section 309 of the Civil

Rights Act of 1991 (2 U.S.C. 1209), to review a final de-
2

SRES 282 ATS

cision concerning allegations of discrimination in Senate

employment;

Whereas section 303(f) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (2

U.S.C. 1203(f)) provides that for the purpose of representation by the Senate Legal Counsel, the Office of

Senate Fair Employment Practices shall be deemed a

committee within the meaning of title VII of the Ethics

in Government Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. 288, et seq.);

Whereas pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and

288c(a)(1)), the Senate may direct its Counsel to defend

a committee of the Senate in any civil action in which

there is placed in issue any action taken by such committee in its official capacity; and

Whereas, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2348, as made applicable by section 309(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991

(2 U.S.C. 1209(b)), the Office of the Sergeant at Arms

of the United States Senate, as a party in interest in the

underlying proceeding within the Senate, may intervene

on judicial review of the final decision in that proceeding:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, The Senate Legal Counsel is directed to

2 represent the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices

3 in the case of Rhonda Farmer v. Office of Senate Fair

4 Employment Practices.

5 SEC. 2. The Office of the Sergeant at Arms of the

6 United States Senate may as a matter of statutory right

7 intervene and be represented by its counsel of choice in
3

SRES 282 ATS

1 the case of Rhonda Farmer v. Office of the Senate Fair

2 Employment Practices.

Æ
#### § 1.43-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the captions contained in §§ 1.43-0 through 1.43-7.

## § 1.43-1 The enhanced oil recovery credit—general rules.

(a) Claiming the credit.

(1) In general.

(2) Examples.

(b) Amount of the credit.

(c) Phase-out of the credit as crude oil prices increase.

(1) In general.

(2) Inflation adjustment.

(3) Examples.

(d) Reduction of associated deductions.

(1) In general.

(2) Certain deductions by an integrated oil company.

(e) Basis adjustment.

(f) Passthrough entity basis adjustment.

(1) Partners' interests in a partnership.

(2) Shareholders' stock in an S corporation.

(g) Examples.

## § 1.43-2 Qualified enhanced oil recovery project.

(a) Qualified enhanced oil recovery project.

(b) More than insignificant increase.

(c) First injection of liquids, gases, or other matter.

(1) In general.

(2) Example.

(d) Significant expansion exception.

(1) In general.

(2) Substantially unaffected reservoir volume.

(3) Terminated projects.

(4) Change in tertiary recovery method.

(5) Examples.

(e) Qualified tertiary recovery methods.

(1) In general.

(2) Tertiary recovery methods that qualify.

(3) Recovery methods that do not qualify.

(4) Examples.

## § 1.43-3 Certification.

(a) Petroleum engineer's certification of a project.

(1) In general.

(2) Timing of certification.

(3) Content of certification.

(b) Operator's continued certification of a project.

(1) In general.

(2) Timing of certification.

(3) Content of certification.

(c) Notice of project termination.

(1) In general.

(2) Timing of notice.

(3) Content of notice.

(d) Failure to submit certification.

(e) Effective date.

## § 1.43-4 Qualified enhanced oil recovery costs.

(a) Qualifying costs.

(1) In general.

(2) Costs paid or incurred for an asset which is used to implement more than one qualified enhanced oil recovery project or for other activities.

(b) Costs defined.

(1) Qualified tertiary injectant expenses.

(2) Intangible drilling and development costs.

(3) Tangible property costs.

(4) Examples.

(c) Primary purpose.

(1) In general.

(2) Tertiary injectant costs.

(3) Intangible drilling and development costs.

(4) Tangible property costs.

(5) Offshore drilling platforms.

(6) Examples.

(d) Costs paid or incurred prior to first injection.

(1) In general.

(2) First injection after filing of return for taxable year costs are allowable.

(3) First injection more than 36 months after close of taxable year costs are paid or incurred.

(4) Injections in volumes less than the volumes specified in the project plan.

(5) Examples.

(e) Other rules.

(1) Anti-abuse rule.

(2) Costs paid or incurred to acquire a project.

(3) Examples.

## § 1.43-5 At-risk limitation.

## § 1.43-6 Election out of section 43.

(a) Election to have the credit not apply.

(1) In general.

(2) Time for making the election.

(3) Manner of making the election.

(b) Election by partnerships and S corporations.

## § 1.43-7 Effective date of regulations.

[T.D. 8448, 57 FR 54923, Nov. 23, 1992]