alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.615-8 Termination of section 615. ( a ) *In general.* The provisions of section 615 shall not apply to exploration expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 1969. Expenditures paid or incurred before January 1, 1970, which were deferred under section 615(b) will be deductible under such section after such date as the units of ore or mineral discovered or explored by reason of such expenditures are sold. An election under section 615(e) with respect to expenditures paid or incurred prior to January 1, 1970, shall remain in effect with respect to such expenditures unless it is revoked under section 615(e) and § 1.615-6. See § 1.615-9 for treatment of a section 615(e) election with respect to expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 1969.
( b ) *Taxable years beginning before January 1, 1970, and ending after December 31, 1969* — ( 1 ) *In general.* The termination of section 615 applies to expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 1969. The income tax treatment of exploration expenditures paid or incurred before January 1, 1970, will be determined in accordance with the provisions of sections 615 and 617 prior to their amendment by the Tax Reform Act of 1969 (83 Stat. 487). The fact that on his income tax return for a taxable year beginning before January 1, 1970, and ending after December 31, 1969, a taxpayer deducts under section 615 expenditures paid or incurred before January 1, 1970, shall not affect his right to deduct under section 617(a) expenditures paid or incurred during such taxable year after December 31, 1969.
( 2 ) *Allocation in case of inadequate records.* If a taxpayer pays or incurs exploration expenditures during a taxable year beginning before January 1, 1970, and ending after December 31, 1969, but his records are inadequate to permit a determination of the amount paid or incurred during the portion of the year ending after December 31, 1969, and the amount paid or incurred on or before such date, the exploration expenditures as to which the records are inadequate paid or incurred with respect to the mine or property during the taxable year shall be allocated to each part of the year (that is, the part before January 1, 1970, and the part occurring after December 31, 1969) in the same ratio which the number of days in each such part year bears to the number of days in the entire taxable year.
[T.D. 7192, 37 FR 12941, June 30, 1972]
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United St ates District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2136

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. ZoAnn Brown, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 2, 2008 Filed: February 4, 2008

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. ZoAnn Brown appeals the 292-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed after she pleaded guilty to possessi ng with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture containing 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). In a brief filed under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Brown’s counsel seeks permission to withdraw.-2- We conclude that Brown’s with in-Guidelines-range sentence is not unreasonable because nothing in the record indicates the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an impr oper factor, or, in weighing the appropriate factors, made a clear error of judgment. See Rita v. United States , 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-68 (2007) (appellate presumption of r easonableness); United States v. Haack , 403 F.3d 997, 1003-04 (8th Cir. 2005) (reasonableness factors). After reviewing the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. A ccordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, conditioned on counsel informing appellant about the procedures for filing a petition for rehearing for certiorari, and we affirm the district court’s judgment.

______________________________
Order filed February 14 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00050

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF D.E.W. A/K/A D.W., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2 016

- 54618



### ORDER This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a parental termination case. The notice of appeal was filed January 23, 2018. Appellant has established indigence or is presumed to be indigent. The reporter’s record was due within 10 day s after the notice of appeal was filed. See Tex. R . App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a)(1).
The record has not been filed. Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice o f appeal is
filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App.P. 35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately com mence

the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, if necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated appeal, we issue the following order:

We o rder Delores Johnson and Alex andra Mc Millen , court reporter s , to file the record in this appeal on or before February 23, 2018

. If Delores Johnson
and Alex andra Mc Millen do not timely file th e record as ordered, the court will issue an order requiring them to appear at a hearing to show cause why the record has not been timely filed and why they should not be held in contempt of court for failing to file the record as ordered. Contempt of cour t is punishable by a fine and/or confinement in jail.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 176 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 176

To designate the Federal building located at 300 4th Street, Northeast, 
   in the District of Columbia, as the ``Daniel Webster Senate Page 
                  Residence'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 24 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

 Mr. Mitchell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To designate the Federal building located at 300 4th Street, Northeast, 
   in the District of Columbia, as the ``Daniel Webster Senate Page 
                  Residence'', and for other purposes.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DANIEL WEBSTER SENATE PAGE RESIDENCE.

    The Federal building located at 300 4th Street, Northeast, in the 
District of Columbia, shall be known and designated as the ``Daniel 
Webster Senate Page Residence''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            4015
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6015
<PP&E>                                         1609219
<DEPRECIATION>                                  119634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1615234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            57590
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7794
<OTHER-SE>                                     1425370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1433164
<SALES>                                          27139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 27139
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   212234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (187399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (187399)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (187399)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
#### § 1.1055-2 Determination of amount realized on the transfer of the right to hold real property subject to liabilities under a redeemable ground rent.

In determining the amount realized from a transfer, occurring on or after April 11, 1963, of the right to hold real property subject to liabilities under a redeemable ground rent, such ground rent shall be accounted for in the same manner as a mortgage for an amount of money equal to the redemption price of the ground rent. The provisions of this section apply in respect of any such transfer even though such ground rent was created prior to April 11, 1963. For provisions relating to the determination of the amount of and recognition of gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of property, see section 1001 and the regulations thereunder.

[T.D. 6821, 30 FR 6217, May 4, 1965]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 23, 2020

NO. 03

- 18

- 00674

- CR

Ashlee Dunbar, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgments revoking community supervision entered by the trial court.

Havi ng reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s judgments revoking community supervision

. Therefore, the

Court affirms the trial court’s judgments revoking community supervision

. Because appellant is

indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Name

(Last, First, Middle) Title Company/ Organization Street Address Phone 

Webinar Attendees: Negotiated Rulemaking Meeting for Distribution Transformers Medium- and Low-Voltage W

City Fax State/ Prov Zip

Meeting Date: 12/2/2011

Transformer Technology Leader

Allen, Ph.D., Jerry Metglas, Inc. 440 Allied Drive Conway SC 29526 843-349-6810 843-349-6Ballard, Jay Engineering Manager Schneider Electric 6 Commercial Rd Huntington IN 46750 N/A N/A 

Consultant Navigant 

1801 K Street NW, Suite 500

Carmichael, Robert Washington DC 20902 202-481-7393 202-973-2Corel, Dale Sr. Design Engineer NEMA 9377 W. Higgins Rd. Rosemont IL 60018 N/A N/A 

Energy Analyst New West Technologies, LLC 1000 Independence 

Ave, SW

Freeman, Jeremiah Washington DC 20585 N/A N/A

Sr Electrical Engineer Schneider Electric 

Harden, Kenneth 6 Commercial Rd Huntington IN 46750 N/A N/AHussain, Mohammad Consulting Engineer ABB Inc 500 Highway 94 W Jefferson City MO 65101 N/A N/A 

Core and Coil Design Engineer

GE Energy Distribution Transformers

7000 West Bert Kouns Industrial Loop

Kaja, Brian Shreverport LA 71129 N/A N/A

Industry Standards Manager Schneider Electric 8821 Garners Ferry 

Road

Kennedy, Chad Hopkins SC 29061 N/A N/A

GM of Distribution Engineering and Emergency Management

Lass, James Cleco Power LLC 2030 Donahue Ferry Rd Pineville LA 71361 N/A N/A 

Consultant Navigant Consulting 

1801 K Street NWSuite 500

Lau, Christopher Washington DC 20006- 202-481-7524 202-973-2

1301

VP Technology Powersmiths International 

Corp

Ling, Philip 10 Devon Road Brampton ON L6T5B5 N/A N/A 

12/15/2011 16:33:16 
Name

(Last, First, Middle) Title Company/ Organization Street Address Phone 

Webinar Attendees: Negotiated Rulemaking Meeting for Distribution Transformers Medium- and Low-Voltage W

City Fax State/ Prov Zip

Meeting Date: 12/2/2011

Consultant Navigant Consulting 1801 K Street, NW, 

Suite 500

Luo, Zhimei Washington DC 20006 240-401-5410 202-973-2

Principal Engineer, Product Development & Applications Engineering

Lyke, Richard F. AK Steel Corporation 705 Curtis Street Middletown OH 45043- 513-425-5709 513-425-5

0001

May, Scott Senior Product Manager Siemens Industry Inc. 621 Green Gap Shores Troy NC 27371 N/A N/A 

Director of Engineering Hammond Power Solutions 

Inc.

Patel, Dhiru 595 Southgate Drive Guelph ON N1G N/A N/A 

3P8

Distinguished Scientist Emeritus

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

160 Southampton Avenue

Rosenfeld, Arthur H. Berkley CA 94707 916-495-2227 510-486-5

Systems Engineer Memphis Light Gas and 

Water

Rossetti, John 220 South Main Memphis TN 38103 N/A N/A Smith, Robert Product Manager Federal Pacific 601 Old Airport Rd Bristol VA 24201 276-645-8836 N/A 

Contacts Included: 19 ocket Id: EERE‐2011‐

12/15/2011 16:33:16
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 12 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk August 12 , 2016

152047 (7 2 )

BARUCH SLS, INC.,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

SC: 152047

v COA: 319953

Tax Tribunal: 00

- 395010;

00

- 415093

TOWNSHIP OF TITTABAWASSEE,

Respondent

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice, the motion of amicus curiae Chelsea Health &

Wellness Foundation to file a response to the brief submitted by amici curiae Michigan

Townships Association, the Michigan Municipal League, the Michigan Association of

Counties, the Michigan Association of School Boards, and the Public Corporation Law

Section of the State Bar of Michigan is DENIED. The response submitted by Chelsea

Health & Wellness Foundation on August, 5, 2016, is not accepted for filing.
Order entered June 2 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01252

- CV

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., AS SUCCESSOR TRU STEE TO CHASE BANK O F TEXAS, N.A., FOR THE REVOCABLE TRUST ESTA BLISHED BY ANGELA LE IGH SIMPSON STARRETT BY AGREEMENT DATED SEPT EMBER 8, 1999, Appellant

V.

ANGELA LEIGH MILITEL LO, F/K/A ANGELA LEI GH SIMPSON STARRETT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 10

- 06211



### O RDER

We GRANT appellee’s Ju ne 1, 2016 unopposed second motion for an extension of time

to file a brief and extend the time to JUNE 14, 2016 . No further extension will be granted

absent extenuating circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
#### § 1.1504-1 Definitions.

The privilege of filing consolidated returns is extended to all includible corporations constituting affiliated groups as defined in section 1504. See the regulations under § 1.1502 for a description of an affiliated group and the corporations which may be considered as includible corporations.

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12106, Nov. 26, 1960]
#### § 1.6016-4 Short taxable year.

(a) *Requirement of declaration.* No declaration may be made for a period of more than 12 months. For purposes of this section a taxable year of 52 or 53 weeks, in the case of a corporation which computes its taxable income in accordance with the election permitted by section 441(f), shall be deemed a period of 12 months. For special rules affecting the time for filing declarations and paying estimated tax by such corporation, see paragraph (b) of § 1.441-2. A separate declaration is required where a corporation is required to submit an income tax return for a period of less than 12 months, but only if such short period ends on or after December 31, 1955. However, no declaration is required if the short taxable year:

(1) Begins on or before December 31, 1963, and is:

(i) A period of less than 9 months, or

(ii) A period of 9 or more months but less than 12 months and the requirements of section 6016(a) are not met before the 1st day of the last month in the short taxable year, or

(2) Begins after December 31, 1963, and is:

(i) A period of less than 4 months, or

(ii) A period of 4 or more months but less than 12 months and the requirements of section 6016(a) are not met before the 1st day of the last month in the short taxable year.

(b) *Income placed on an annual basis.* In cases where the short taxable year results from a change of annual accounting period, for the purpose of determining whether the anticipated income for a short taxable year will result in an estimated tax liability requiring the filing of a declaration, such income shall be placed on an annual basis in the manner prescribed in section 443(b)(1). If a tax computed on such annualized income exceeds the sum of $100,000 and any credits under part IV, of subchapter A, chapter 1 of the Code, the estimated tax shall be the same part of the excess so computed as the number of months in the short period is of 12 months. Thus, for example, a corporation which changes from a calendar year basis to a fiscal year basis beginning October 1, 1956, will have a short taxable year beginning January 1, 1956, and ending September 30, 1956. If on or before August 31, 1956, the taxpayer anticipates that it will have income of $264,000 for the 9-month taxable year the estimated tax is computed as follows:

| (1) Anticipated taxable income for 9 months | $264,000 |
| --- | --- |
| (2) Annualized income ($264,000 × 12 ÷ 9) | 352,000 |
| (3) Tax liability on item (2) | 177,540 |
| (4) Item (3) reduced by $100,000 (there are no credits under part IV, subchapter A, chapter 1 of the Code) | 77,540 |
| (5) Estimated tax for 9-month period ($77,540 × 9 ÷ 12) | 58,155 |

Since the tax liability on the annualized income is in excess of $100,000, a declaration is required to be filed, reporting an estimated tax of $58,155 for the 9-month taxable period. This paragraph has no application where the short taxable year does not result from a change in the taxpayer's annual accounting period.

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12108, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6768, 29 FR 14922, Nov. 4, 1964]
427 A.2d 1220

#### Commonwealth v. Napper, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, WIEAND and VAN der VOORT, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
§ 1.684-5 Effective/applicability dates. ( a ) Sections 1.684-1 through 1.684-4 apply to transfers of property to foreign trusts and foreign estates after August 7, 2000, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) In the case a U.S. transferor decedent dying in 2010, § 1.684-3(c) applies to transfers of property to foreign trusts, foreign estates, and nonresident aliens after December 31, 2009, and before January 1, 2011.
[T.D. 9811, 82 FR 6239, Jan. 19, 2017]
Exhibit 4.48



PROMISSARY NOTE



|Borrower: | Ehave, Inc. of 277 Lakeshore Road East, Suite 203, Oakville, ON L6J 6J3 (the “Company”)
|--------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|          |                                                                                        
|Lender:   | ____________of ___________ (the “Lender”)                                              



Principal Amount: $________CDN



| | 1. | FOR VALUE RECEIVED, The Borrower promise to pay the Lender at such address as may be provided in writing to the Borrower, the
principal sum of $__________. This note shall rank senior to all
other debt of the Company. This Note is due on April 5, 2019.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Any time while not in default under this Note, the Borrower may repay the outstanding balance then owing under this Note to
the Lender without further bonus or penalty.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | This Note will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 4. | This Note will endure to the benefit of and be binding upon the representative heirs, executors, administrators, successors
and assigns of the Borrower and the Lender.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly affixed their signatures
under seal on this 28 day of January, 2019.



|SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED | Ehave, Inc.               
|---------------------------- | --------------------------
|                             |                           
|January 28, 2019             |                           
|                             |                           
|                             | Per ______________________
|                             |                           
|SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED | __________________        
|                             |                           
|January 28, 2019             |                           
|                             |                           
|                             | Per ______________________
Executive Retirement Plan



 Exhibit 10.10.3 
 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 
 EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 AMENDMENT 2006-1 
 Subject to Section 11.02 of the
Executive Retirement Plan, Section 4.02 of the Executive Retirement Plan is hereby amended to read as follows effective January 1, 2007 as to any participant in such plan who is not then qualified for or receiving benefits under such plan:

 4.02 Interests 
 The annual reamortization of
payments described in Section 4.01(c) will be determined each year using a monthly rate of interest that is one-twelfth of the annual “applicable interest rate” as such term is described in the Qualified Plan and then in effect for
calculating benefits thereunder. This interest rate, determined on an annualized basis, will also be used to calculate starting balances and lump sums for purposes of Section 4.01(b).