alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 9/28/97 and the Consolidated  Statement of
     Operations for the 9 months ended 9/28/97.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         4,593
<SECURITIES>                                   1,732
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,880 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10,375
<PP&E>                                        68,861 <F1> 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               111,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         21,883
<BONDS>                                       67,514
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       2,085
<OTHER-SE>                                    16,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 111,517
<SALES>                                      104,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             109,207
<CGS>                                         34,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                105,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (2)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     415
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.10)

<FN>
<F1> The asset values for receivables and PP&E represent net amounts.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTurbine blade and vane heat flux sensor development, phase 2The development of heat flux sensors for gas turbine blades and vanes and the demonstration of heat transfer measurement methods are reported. The performance of the heat flux sensors was evaluated in a cylinder in cross flow experiment and compared with two other heat flux measurement methods, the slug calorimeter and a dynamic method based on fluctuating gas and surface temperature. Two cylinders, each instrumented with an embedded thermocouple sensor, a Gardon gauge, and a slug calorimeter, were fabricated. Each sensor type was calibrated using a quartz lamp bank facility. The instrumented cylinders were then tested in an atmospheric pressure combustor rig at conditions up to gas stream temperatures of 1700K and velocities to Mach 0.74. The test data are compared to other measurements and analytical prediction.Document ID19860002759Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAtkinson, W. H.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Group East Hartford, CT, United States)*Cyr, M. A.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Group East Hartford, CT, United States)*Strange, R. R.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Group East Hartford, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1985Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberPWS-5914-39NAS 1.26:174995NASA-CR-174995Accession Number86N12226Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23629Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860002759.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NUMBER 13-23-00458-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

SERGIO CHAVEZ AND

MARIA D. GARCIA, Appellants,

v.

ALEJANDRO MORENO, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

On October 25, 2023, appellants filed a notice of appeal.On October 26, 2023, the 

Clerk of the Court notified appellants that their notice of appeal was not in compliance 

with the Texas Rule of Appellant Procedure 9.1(c)(1). See TEX. R. APP. P.
2

9.1(c)(1). Appellants were also asked to remit the $205.00 filing fee within ten days from 

the date of the notice. 

On November 15, 2023, the Clerk of the Court again notified appellants of the 

defects and that they were delinquent in remitting a $205.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this 

Court notified appellants the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid 

within ten days from the date of the notice. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).

Furthermore, the clerk’s record was due on December 18, 2023. On January 2, 

2024, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the deputy district clerk, Sarah Reyes, 

informed the Court that appellants failed to make arrangements for payment of the 

clerk’s record. Appellants were notified that unless they made arrangements to pay for 

the clerk’s record and proof of payment was provided to the Court within ten days, the 

appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See id. R. R. 37.3(b). 

Appellants have not cured the defective notice of appeal, paid the filing fee, and 

no clerk’s record has been filed due to appellants’ failure to pay or make payment 

arrangements. Additionally, appellants have failed to comply with a notice from the Clerk 

of the Court requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, 

the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b),(c).

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the

1st day of February, 2024.
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0393

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

QUINTON RAND SEDERDAHL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including October 21, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 11 2020

09/11/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0393
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              458,065
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       470,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                       1,467,668
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2,557,949
<PP&E>                                            1,557,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,556,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,185,541
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             10,753
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,359,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5,556,242
<SALES>                                           1,410,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,410,793
<CGS>                                               639,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,965,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   18,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,212,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,212,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,212,388)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.12)



</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the matter of the Guardianship of E.M.D.

, * From the County Court at Law No. 2

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. G1297

- CC

.

No. 11

- 20

- 00 042

- C V * October 22 , 20 20

* Memorand um Opinion by Bailey , C.J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

( Willson , J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the

order of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed. The co sts incurred by reason of

this appeal are taxed against Billie Dean

.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.69

                             THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
             DTE ENERGY COMPANY EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

     The DTE Energy Company Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is amended as
follows, effective December 31, 2006:

1.   New Section 4.01(c) is added as follows:

               (c) No Deferrals Permitted After December 31, 2006. No Eligible
     Employee may elect to defer any Performance Shares payable after December
     31, 2006.

2.   New Section 4.03(c) is added as follows:

               (d) No Deferrals Permitted After December 31, 2006. No Eligible
     Employee may elect to defer any Annual Cash Bonus payable after December
     31, 2006.

Amendment adopted by Organization and Compensation Committee on October 30,
2006.

Amendment effective December 31, 2006.

                            CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
                                       OF
                               DTE ENERGY COMPANY

I, Sandra Kay Ennis, certify that I am the Corporate Secretary of DTE Energy
Company, a Michigan corporation (the "Company"), and have access to the
Company's corporate records and am familiar with the matters contained and
certified to in this Certificate.

I certify that, at a duly called meeting of the Organization and Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company held on October 30, 2006, the
Board of Directors adopted the above amendment.


/s/ Sandra Kay Ennis
-----------------------------------------
Sandra Kay Ennis

February 19, 2007
-----------------------------------------
Date
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Corporate
                                                       Trust Services
                                                       MAC R1204-010
                                                       9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       Tel: 410 884 2000
                                                       Fax: 410 715 2380
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Re: |  | Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C32, Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C32
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of October 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
as Certificate Administrator (“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31,
2016 (the “Reporting Period”):



(a) A review of Wells Fargo’s
activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision;
and



(b)To the best of such officer’s
knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.





February 27, 2017



|/s/
    BRIAN SMITH | 
|------------------- | 
|BRIAN
    SMITH     | 
|Vice
    President  | 



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together
    we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | -------------------------
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015, by and among J.P.Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC,as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, andPentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C30 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 1.663(c)-2 Rules of administration. ( a ) *When separate shares come into existence.* A separate share comes into existence upon the earliest moment that a fiduciary may reasonably determine, based upon the known facts, that a separate economic interest exists.
( b ) *Computation of distributable net income for each separate share* — ( 1 ) *General rule.* The amount of distributable net income for any share under section 663(c) is computed as if each share constituted a separate trust or estate. Accordingly, each separate share shall calculate its distributable net income based upon its portion of gross income that is includible in distributable net income and its portion of any applicable deductions or losses.
( 2 ) *Section 643(b) income.* This paragraph (b)(2) governs the allocation of the portion of gross income includible in distributable net income that is income within the meaning of section 643(b). Such gross income is allocated among the separate shares in accordance with the amount of income that each share is entitled to under the terms of the governing instrument or applicable local law.
( 3 ) *Income in respect of a decedent.* This paragraph (b)(3) governs the allocation of the portion of gross income includible in distributable net income that is income in respect of a decedent within the meaning of section 691(a) and is not income within the meaning of section 643(b). Such gross income is allocated among the separate shares that could potentially be funded with these amounts irrespective of whether the share is entitled to receive any income under the terms of the governing instrument or applicable local law. The amount of such gross income allocated to each share is based on the relative value of each share that could potentially be funded with such amounts.
( 4 ) *Gross income not attributable to cash.* This paragraph (b)(4) governs the allocation of the portion of gross income includible in distributable net income that is not attributable to cash received by the estate or trust (for example, original issue discount, a distributive share of partnership tax items, and the pro rata share of an S corporation's tax items). Such gross income is allocated among the separate shares in the same proportion as section 643(b) income from the same source would be allocated under the terms of the governing instrument or applicable local law.
( 5 ) *Deductions and losses.* Any deduction or any loss which is applicable solely to one separate share of the trust or estate is not available to any other share of the same trust or estate.
( c ) *Computations and valuations.* For purposes of calculating distributable net income for each separate share, the fiduciary must use a reasonable and equitable method to make the allocations, calculations, and valuations required by paragraph (b) of this section.
[T.D. 8849, 64 FR 72543, Dec. 28, 1999]
AAM

- 13

- 337

- E May 07, 2013

Exemption No. 9930 B

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2009

- 0746

Ms. Lynn Michaud

Interstate Aviation, Inc.

62 Johnson Avenue

Plainville, CT 06062

Dear Ms. Michaud :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 9930 , as amended . It expl ains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the

conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 17, 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Interstate Aviation, Inc. ( Interstate Aviation )

, for an extension of Exemption

No. 9930 , as amended . That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulation s allows Interstate Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the

regulation, to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relati ve to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register beca use the requested extension of the exemption w ould not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Interstate Aviation

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9930 , as

amended, remains valid with respect to t his exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegat ed to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Interstate Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of

the Interstat e Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9930 , as amended, to

September 30, 201 5

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy General Air Surgeon
#### § 1.851-4 Determination of status.

With respect to the effect which certain discrepancies between the value of its various investments and the requirements of section 851(b)(4) and paragraph (c) of § 1.851-2, or the effect that the elimination of such discrepancies will have on the status of a company as a regulated investment company for purposes of part I, subchapter M, chapter 1 of the Code, see section 851(d). A company claiming to be a regulated investment company shall keep sufficient records as to investments so as to be able to show that it has complied with the provisions of section 851 during the taxable year. Such records shall be kept at all times available for inspection by any internal revenue officer or employee and shall be retained so long as the contents thereof may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law.

[T.D. 6598, 27 FR 4090, Apr. 28, 1962]
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     I, Julie Smolyansky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Lifeway Foods, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for three
month period ended March 31, 2005:

          (1) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

     This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


Date: May 16, 2005
                                      /s/ Julie Smolyansky
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Julie Smolyansky, Chief Executive Officer,
                                      President, and Director