T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AR C AD I O S . AC UN A, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. L E A A N N C H R O N E S ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 15239 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 7 - c v - 0 5 4 2 3 - V RW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia V aughn R . W a l ke r , C hi e f J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A rc adi o S . A cuna, a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct court ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng thathe w as im p r o p e r lyp la c e din a d m in is tr a tiv e s e g r e g a tio n o n th e b a s is o f h is m e m b e r s h ip in 

# FI LED JU N 17 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 15239 2 ap r is o n g a n g . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . M p o yo v. L i t to n E lectro -O

p t i ca l S ys. , 43 0 F . 3d 98 5, 98 7 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( re s ju d ic a ta ) ; W

y at t v . T e rhune , 3 1 5 F .3 d1 1 0 8 , 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( f a ilu r e to e x h au s t ) . W e a f

f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed the du e proces s c l ai m s bec ause they h a v e a lr e a d yb e e n litig a te db yth e p a rtie s o rth e irp r iv ie s in s ta te c o u rt. Se e A c una v . Ki rkland , N o . H C - P B - 0 5 - 0 0 0 5 2 4 2 , s lip o p . a t 1 ( C a l. S u p e r . C t. O c t. 6 , 2 0 0 6 ) ; In r e A r c adi o A c una , N o. H C P B 06 -523 5, sl i p o p. at3 (C al . S up er . C t . A pr. 6, 20 07 ); see a l so Kay v. C i t

y of R an cho P alos V

erdes , 504 F . 3d 803, 808 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( s e ttin g f o rth e le m e n ts o f

r e s ju d ic a tau n d e rC a lif o rn iala w ) ; Si lv e r ton v . D e p’ t of T rea su ry , 64 4 F . 2d 13 41 , 13 47 (9th C i r. 19 81 ) ( ho l di ng that“ because of the nature of a s t at e habeas proceedi ng , a dec i si on ac tual l y r endered shoul d p re cl ud e an id e n tic a l is s u e f

r o m b e in g r e litig a te din as u b s e q u e n t § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n if th e s ta te habe a s c ourta f

f or de d af ul l a nd f a i ropportuni tyf

orthe i s s ue t o be he a r d a nd d e te rm in e du n d e rf

e d e r a l s ta n d a r d s ” ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d the r e t a l i a t i on c l a i m s be c aus e A c una d idn o t e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s a s to th o s e c la im s b e f o r e c o m m e n c in g th is a c tio n . See M

cKi nn eyv. Carey , 3 1 1 F. 3 d1 1 9 8 , 1 1 9 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 2 ) ( p e rc u r i a m)09- 15239 3 ( e xhaus t i on unde r42 U . S . C . § 1997e ( a ) m us toc c urpr i ort o c om m e nc e m e ntof the ac t i on ). A cuna’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.