alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Calendar No. 205

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 102

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 840 entitled ‘‘For the relief of the esa report thereon. of the United States Court of Federal Claims for tate of Dr. Beatrice Braude.’’ to the Chief Judge

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Reported without amendment
III

Calendar No. 205

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 102

To refer S. 840 entitled ‘‘For the relief of the estate of Dr. Beatrice Braude.’’

to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for

a report thereon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 28 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself and Mr. D’AMATO) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 840 entitled ‘‘For the relief of the estate of

Dr. Beatrice Braude.’’ to the Chief Judge of the United

States Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

1 Resolved, That the bill S. 840 entitled ‘‘For the relief

2 of the estate of Dr. Beatrice Braude.’’ now pending in the

3 Senate, together with all the accompanying papers, is re4 ferred to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of

5 Federal Claims. The Chief Judge shall proceed with the

6 same in accordance with the provisions of sections 1492
2

•SRES 102 RS

1 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code, and report

2 thereon to the Senate, at the earliest practicable date, giv3 ing such findings of fact and conclusions thereon as shall

4 be sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature and

5 character of the demand as a claim, legal or equitable,

6 against the United States or a gratuity and the amount,

7 if any, legally or equitably due to the claimants from the

8 United States.
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1420 Radionuclide test pattern phantom. ( a ) *Identification.* A radionuclide test pattern phantom is a device that consists of an arrangement of radiopaque or radioactive material sealed in a solid pattern intended to serve as a test for a performance characteristic of a nuclear medicine imaging device.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
[53 FR 1567, Jan. 20, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 13832, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38819, July 25, 2001]
FOCUS (2/2/2004)

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #1 CBI: No

ID Number: P-04-0244

ENGINEER: Prothero \ JB

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE: chemical intermediate

OTHER USES: 

 

 

 

 

 

MSDS: No Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Chemical safety glasses with side shields or

goggles, chemical resistant gloves, Use local

exhaust to minimize misting and vapor, and

mechanical ventilation for general area control.

Respirator: Wear a NIOSH/MSHA approved organic/acid gas

cartridge respirator if misting or vapor

occurs.

Health Effects: May be harmful by inhalation, ingestion or

skin absorption. Causes mucous membrane and upper

respiratory tract irritation. Causes skin and eye

irritation.

CRSS (1/20/2004):

Chemical Name: Ethane, 2-bromo-1,1-difluoroS-H20: 1.1 g/L @

VP: 233.0000000000 torr @

MW: 144.95 

Phys State: NEAT: liquid; MFG: liquid; PROC/FORM: NA; 

END USE: destroyed.

Consumer Use:

SAT (1/21/2004):

Migration to groundwater: rapid

PBT rating: P1B1T2

Health: 2 (dermal, inhalation, drinking water)

Eco: 1 (no releases to water)
FOCUS (2/2/2004)

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #2 CBI: No

ID Number: P-04-0244

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

IRER generated by ChemSTEER ver 7/24/03. The vapor pressure for the 

PMN was above 35 torr (vapor model limits), therefore, the CFC 

substitutes generic scenario was used.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No 
FOCUS (2/2/2004)

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #3 CBI: No

ID Number: P-04-0244

Number of Sites:

Days/yr:

Process Description:

 ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
FOCUS (2/2/2004)

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #4 CBI: No

ID Number: P-04-0244

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Inhalation:

Dermal:
FOCUS (2/2/2004)

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #5 CBI: No

ID Number: P-04-0244

Number of Sites:

Days/yr:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
FOCUS (2/2/2004)

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page #4 CBI: No

ID Number: P-04-0244

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

 

Inhalation:

Dermal:
Record ofDiscussion Docket No. FAA201 b -AINt- o..(q

**~..D** Directorate Identifier: -AD 

### With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED Boeing Joan Lenker Numerous Concur. Boeing Lance Wires Numerous Concur. Boeing Francis Whichman Numerous Concur. 

### A4A Robert Ireland 

### 3/14/2016 Concur.

Other /Additional Information:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael E. Hofmann,  certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Itec Environmental
Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003.

/s/ Michael E. Hofmann
----------------------
Michael E. Hofmann
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
31.2
  
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I,
Frederick Smith, Jr., certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Itec Environmental Group, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
  ****May 13, 2005
    
    /s/Frederick Smith, Jr.
      Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal Financial
      Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW164374]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(2), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Thunderbird Energy, Inc. for competitive oil and gas lease WYW164374 for land in Weston County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. Weaver, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of                           ( print page 38044)                        $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16-2/3 percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW1674374 effective January 1, 2009, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                

Julie L. Weaver,

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. E9-18213 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
§ 1.6038A-7 Noncompliance. ( a ) *In general.* In the case of any failure described in § 1.6038A-5 or § 1.6038A-6, the rules of this § 1.6038A-7 apply to the reporting corporation. In such a case— ( 1 ) The amount of the deduction allowed under subtitle A for any amount paid or incurred by the reporting corporation to the related party in connection with such transaction, and
( 2 ) The cost to the reporting corporation of any property acquired in such transaction from the related party or transferred by such corporation in such transaction to the related party, may be determined by the District Director.
( b ) *Determination of the amount.* The amount of the deduction or the cost to the reporting corporation shall be the amount determined by the District Director (in the District Director's sole discretion) from the District Director's own knowledge or from such information as the District Director may choose to obtain through testimony or otherwise. The District Director shall consider any information or materials that have been submitted by the reporting corporation or a foreign related party. The District Director, however, may disregard any information, documents, or records submitted by the reporting corporation or the related party if (in the District Director's sole discretion) the District Director deems that they are insufficiently probative of the relevant facts.
( c ) *Separate application.* If the noncompliance penalty of this section applies with respect to transactions with a related party of the reporting corporation, it will not be applied with respect to any other related parties of the reporting corporation solely upon the basis of that failure. Thus, for example, if a reporting corporation engages in transactions with related party A and related party B, and the reporting corporation does not respond to a summons for records related to the transactions between the reporting corporation and related party A, the noncompliance penalty imposed as a result of such failure will not apply to the transactions between the reporting corporation and related party B. If a separate summons is issued for records relating to the transactions between the reporting corporation and related party B and the reporting corporation does not produce such records, the noncompliance penalty may be applied to those transactions.
( d ) *Effective dates.* For effective dates for this section, see § 1.6038A-1(n).
[T.D. 8353, 56 FR 28075, June 19, 1991]
##### 



ZIX CORPORATION
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
    Definitions
 Acquiring Person
 Affiliate and Associate
 Change in Control
   1




---



##### 



Continuing Director .
 Disability
  2




---



##### 



Exchange Act
 Resignation.
 Retirement
 Term of Option
 Exercise of Option .
 Exercise
 Adjustment
 Method of Exercise
  3




---



##### 



Termination of Option
   4




---



##### 



No Rights as Shareholder .
 State and Federal Securities Regulation .
  5




---



##### 



Modification of Options .
 Withholding of Taxes .
 Continued Employment Not Presumed .
 Non-Competition Covenants .
 either either
   6




---



##### 



Option Issued Pursuant to Plan
  7




---



##### 



No Liability of Option .
 No Assignment .
 Governing Law .
 Entire Agreement .
 Notice .
 ZIX CORPORATIONDate: 4/27/07
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Barry W. WilsonBarry W. WilsonChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  8




---



##### 



Zix Corporation (TX)2711 N. Haskell Avenue
    
    Signature PageSuite 2200
    
    Sign and return to the legal departmentDallas, Texas 75204United States
  Effective Date of Grant:
    
    December 18, 2006Name of Optionee:
    
    Robertson, DavidNumber of Shares:
    
    100,000.00Exercise Price:
    
    $1.50Plan Name:
    
    2004 Stock Option PlanExpiration Date:
    
    December 17, 2016
 Vesting Schedule:
    
    Number of Shares:
    
    
    Vest Date:8,333.33
    
    
    March 18, 20078,333.33
    
    
    June 18, 20078,333.33
    
    
    September 18, 20078,333.33
    
    
    December 18, 20078,333.33
    
    
    March 18, 20088,333.33
    
    
    June 18, 20088,333.33
    
    
    September 18, 20088,333.33
    
    
    December 18, 20088,333.33
    
    
    March 18, 20098,333.33
    
    
    June 18, 20098,333.33
    
    
    September 18, 20098,333.33
    
    
    December 18, 2009
 /s/ David Robertson
    
    
    
    Date:May 7, 2007Optionee Signature
 Equity Enterprise
    
    Page 1 of 1
§ 1.6425-1 Adjustment of overpayment of estimated income tax by corporation. ( a ) *In general.* Any corporation which has made an overpayment of estimated income tax for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1967, may file an application for an adjustment of such overpayment. The right to file an application for an adjustment of overpayment of estimated income tax is limited to corporations.
( b ) *Contents of application.* ( 1 ) The application for an adjustment of overpayment of estimated income tax shall be filed on Form 4466. The application shall be filled out in accordance with the instructions accompanying the form, and all information required by the form and instructions must be furnished by the corporation. The application shall be verified in the manner prescribed by section 6065 as in the case of a return of the corporation.
( 2 ) An application for an adjustment of overpayment of estimated income tax does not constitute a claim for credit or refund. If such application is disallowed by the district director, or director of a service center, in whole or in part, no suit may be maintained in any court for the recovery of any tax based on such application. The filing of an application for an adjustment of overpayment of estimated income tax will not constitute the filing of a claim for credit or refund within the meaning of section 6511 for the purpose of determining whether a claim for refund was filed prior to the expiration of the applicable period of limitation. The corporation, however, may file a claim for credit or refund under section 6402 at any time prior to the expiration of the applicable period of limitation and may maintain a suit based on such claim if it is disallowed or if the district director, or director of a service center, does not act on the claim within 6 months from the date it is filed. Such claim may be filed before, simultaneously with, or after the filing of the application for the adjustment of overpayment of estimated tax. A claim for credit or refund under section 6402 filed after the filing of an application for an adjustment of overpayment of estimated income tax is not to be considered an amendment of such application. Such claim, however, in proper cases, may constitute an amendment to a prior claim filed under section 6402.
( c ) *Time and place for filing application.* ( 1 ) The application for an adjustment of overpayment of estimated income tax shall be filed after the last day of the taxable year and on or before the 15th day of the third month thereafter, or before the date on which the corporation first files its income tax return for such taxable year (whether or not it subsequently amends the return), whichever is earlier.
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of § 301.6091-1 of this chapter (relating to hand-carried documents), the application on Form 4466 shall be filed with the internal revenue officer designated in instructions applicable to such form.
[T.D. 7059, 35 FR 14546, Sept. 17, 1970]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 285 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 285

To express the sense of the Senate concerning phasing in implementation 
      of Forest Management Plans by the Department of Agriculture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 8 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

    Mr. Lott (for himself, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Heflin, Mr. 
Johnston, Mr. Nunn, Mr. Craig, Mr. Pressler, and Mr. Shelby) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To express the sense of the Senate concerning phasing in implementation 
      of Forest Management Plans by the Department of Agriculture.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the Secretary of Agriculture shall, in connection with 
        each proposed forest management change proposed, recognize the 
        multiple uses of the National Forests;
            (2) the Secretary of Agriculture shall phase in to the 
        greatest extent practicable each forest management change that 
        would amend or revise a forest plan to provide for a diversity 
        of plant and animal communities in a particular National Forest 
        or district of the Forest Service; and
            (3) to the extent authorized by law prior to implementation 
        of such changes, the Secretary of Agriculture shall consider 
        such factors as, economic consequences faced by affected 
        communities, the impact on state and local revenues, and the 
        agency's financial resources which are available for 
        implementation.
                                 <all>
```
No. 43647.

February 6, 1939

#### *Richard W. Gibson.*

Rental allowances, officer of the Air Corps, U. S. A. Findings of fact, conclusion of law, and judgment for $300.90, on, authority of *O'Mohundro*v. *United States,*84 C. Cls. 362.