alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 91 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 203

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               S. RES. 91

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 To refer S. 745 entitled ``A Bill for the Relief of Hardwick, Inc.'', 
    to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 203
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 91

 To refer S. 745 entitled ``A Bill for the Relief of Hardwick, Inc.'', 
    to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 2 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

Mr. Simon submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                Reported by Mr. Biden, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To refer S. 745 entitled ``A Bill for the Relief of Hardwick, Inc.'', 
    to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

    Resolved, That the bill S. 745 entitled ``A Bill for the Relief of 
Hardwick, Inc.'', now pending in the Senate, together with all 
accompanying papers, is referred to the Chief Judge of the United 
States Court of Federal Claims. The Chief Judge shall proceed with 
consideration of such case in accordance with the provisions of 
sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code (notwithstanding 
any other appeal, statute, case law, or regulations, including section 
1500 of title 28, United States Code, that may limit in any way the 
jurisdiction or authority of the court), and report thereon to the 
Senate at the earliest practicable date giving findings of fact and 
conclusions thereon as shall be sufficient to inform the Congress of 
the nature and character of the demand as a claim, legal or equitable 
against the United States, and the amount, if any, legally or equitably 
due to the claimants from the United States.
```
§ 1.594-1 Mutual savings banks conducting life insurance business. ( a ) *Scope of application.* Section 594 applies to the case of a mutual savings bank not having capital stock represented by shares which conducts a life insurance business, if: ( 1 ) The conduct of the life insurance business is authorized under State law,
( 2 ) The life insurance business is carried on in a separate department of the bank,
( 3 ) The books of account of the life insurance business are maintained separately from other departments of the bank, and
( 4 ) The life insurance department of the bank would, if it were treated as a separate corporation, qualify as a life insurance company under section 801.
( b ) *Computation of tax.* In the case of a mutual savings bank conducting a life insurance business to which section 594 is applicable, the tax upon such bank consists of the sum of the following: ( 1 ) A partial tax computed under section 11 upon the taxable income of the bank determined without regard to any items of income or deduction properly allocable to the life insurance department, and
( 2 ) A partial tax computed on the income (or, in the case of taxable years beginning before January 1, 1955, the taxable income (as defined in section 803)) of the life insurance department determined without regard to any items of income or deduction not properly allocable to such department, at the rates and in the manner provided in subchapter L (section 801 and following), chapter 1 of the Code, with respect to life insurance companies.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparison of Tomo-PIV Versus Dual Plane PIV on a Synthetic Jet FlowParticle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) is a planar velocity measurement technique that has found widespread use across a wide class of engineering disciplines. Tomographic PIV (tomoPIV) is an extension of the traditional PIV technique whereby the velocity across a volume of fluid is measured. TomoPIV provides additional fluid mechanical properties of the flow due to the adjacent planes of velocity information that are extracted. Dual Plane PIV is another approach for providing cross-plane flow field properties. Dual Plane PIV and tomoPIV provide all of the same flow properties, albeit through very different routes with significantly different levels of effort, hence a comparison of their application and performance would prove beneficial in a well-known, highly three dimensional flow field. A synthetic jet flow which has a wide range of flow field features including high velocity gradients and regions of high vorticity was used as a rigorous test bed to determine the capabilities limitations of the Dual Plane PIV and tomoPIV techniques. The results show that compressing 3D particle field information down to a limited number of views does not permit the accurate reconstruction of the flow field. The traditional thin sheet techniques are the best approach for accurate flow field measurements.Document ID20170004845Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWernet, Mark P.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredJune 1, 2017Publication DateMay 1, 2017Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219508E-19367GRC-E-DAA-TN31079Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS.109492.02.03.02.20.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsParticle Image VelocimetryPulse Detonation EnginesFlow MeasurementAvailable DownloadsNameType20170004845.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1.547-3 Claim for credit or refund. ( a ) If a deficiency in personal holding company tax is asserted for any taxable year, and the corporation has paid any portion of such asserted deficiency, it is entitled to a credit or refund of such payment to the extent that such payment constitutes an overpayment as the result of a deduction for a deficiency dividend as provided in section 547 and §§ 1.547-1 through 1.547-7. It should be noted that a *determination* under section 547(c) and paragraph (b)(1) of § 1.547-2, of taxpayer's liability for personal holding company tax may take place subsequent to the time the deficiency was paid. To secure credit or refund of such overpayment, the taxpayer must file a claim on Form 843 in addition to the claim for the deduction for deficiency dividends required under section 547(e) and paragraph (b)(2) of § 1.547-2.
( b ) No interest shall be allowed on such credit or refund.
( c ) Such credit or refund will be allowed as if, on the date of the determination under section 547(c) and paragraph (b)(1) of § 1.547-2, two years remained before the expiration of the period of limitation on the filing of claim for refund for the taxable year to which the overpayment relates.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for **

the District of North Dakota, sitting by designation.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FRANCISCO SOLANO-GODINEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10084

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-03696-CKJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Daniel L. Hovland, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted January 15, 2013*** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Solano-Godinez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after

FILED

JAN 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10084

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Solano-Godinez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided Solano-Godinez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. 

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
#### Otis Swanson *v.*Frederick G. Reincke, Warden, Connecticut State Prison

*Otis Swanson,*pro se, on the petition.

Submitted June 23

decided June 23, 1964

The petition addressed to this court for a certification that there is a question involved in the decision denying habeas corpus which ought to be reviewed on appeal is denied by the court for the reason that such a petition calls for action by a justice rather than by the court. General Statutes § 52-470.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 215

To authorize testimony and representation of a former employee of the Senate

in Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser Engineers Hanford Co.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 23 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony and representation of a former employee of the Senate in Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser

Engineers Hanford Co.

Whereas in the case of Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser Engineers Hanford Co., Numbered 94–ERA–14, pending in

the United States Department of Labor, counsel for the

complainant has requested deposition testimony from

Robert Alvarez, a former employee of the Senate on the

staff of the Committee on Governmental Affairs;

Whereas pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, sections 288b(a) and

288c(a)(2) of title 2, United States Code, the Senate may

direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate

with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official responsibilities;
2

SRES 215 ATS

Whereas by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken

from such control or possession but by permission of the

Senate; and

Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Robert Alvarez is authorized to testify

2 in the case of Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser Engineers Han3 ford Co., and any related proceedings, except concerning

4 matters for which a privilege should be asserted.

5 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is authorized

6 to represent Robert Alvarez in connection with his testi7 mony in Sonja I. Anderson v. Kaiser Engineers Hanford

8 Co.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, Michael L. Middleton, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-County Financial Corporation,certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tri-County FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board or directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 6, 2007                            /s/ Michael L. Middleton    Michael L. Middleton    President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, Special Emphasis Panel ARRA Grant Opportunities--Image 
Resource for Biology--ZGM1 CBB-4 (IR)
    Date: August 14, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Mona R. Trempe, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3AN12, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3998, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4b0b6a1a9b4a1a9ab84a9a5ada8eaaaadaceaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="285c5a4d45584d4547684549414406464140064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)


    Dated: July 28, 2009.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-18488 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 177

Expressing the sense of the Congress that family members and others should

support all individuals affected by breast cancer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 10, 1996

Mr. ZELIFF submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that family members

and others should support all individuals affected by

breast cancer.

Whereas an individual’s fight against breast cancer is a family matter;

Whereas breast cancer is a disease of epidemic proportions,

with 46,000 individuals in the United States expected to

die from breast cancer in 1996, and 1 out of every 8

women in the United States expected to develop breast

cancer in her lifetime;

Whereas every year millions of family members and other

loved ones of individuals with breast cancer will be left

to cope with the devastating loss caused by breast cancer;
2

•HCON 177 IH

Whereas the family members, including spouses, children,

parents, brothers, and sisters, and other loved ones of individuals with breast cancer can offer strong emotional

support to each other in addition to the support that they

can offer to the individuals with breast cancer;

Whereas it is important that the family members and other

loved ones of individuals with breast cancer, in addition

to the individuals with breast cancer, be supported to the

greatest extent possible; and

Whereas it is important that the people of the Nation support

the family members and other loved ones of individuals

with breast cancer in addition to supporting the individuals with breast cancer: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the people of the Nation should support in4 dividuals with breast cancer and the family members

5 and other loved ones of individuals with breast can6 cer; and

7 (2) the family members and other loved ones of

8 individuals with breast cancer should support each

9 other in addition to the individuals with breast can10 cer.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                         2,844,982
<SECURITIES>                   1,360,567
<RECEIVABLES>                  7,476,723
<ALLOWANCES>                      42,000
<INVENTORY>                   26,295,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              40,105,557
<PP&E>                        10,388,717
<DEPRECIATION>                 5,252,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                51,549,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          4,550,184
<BONDS>                       15,067,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                        5,774
<COMMON>                          34,382
<OTHER-SE>                    27,300,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  51,549,626
<SALES>                       35,075,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              35,075,377
<CGS>                         19,322,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 19,322,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               986,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  802,184
<INCOME-TAX>                     246,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              848,896
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     848,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .21
        


</TABLE>
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 116

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical corrections in the

enrollment of S. 1060.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 29, 1995

Mr. CANADY of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make technical

corrections in the enrollment of S. 1060.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 1060,

3 to provide for the disclosure of lobbying activities to influ4 ence the Federal Government, and for other purposes, the

5 Secretary of the Senate shall make the following correc6 tions:

7 (1) In section 6(8), strike ‘‘6’’ and insert ‘‘7’’.

8 (2) In section 9(7), insert ‘‘and’’ after the semi9 colon, in section 9(8), strike ‘‘; and’’ and insert a pe10 riod, and strike paragraph (9) of section 9.
2

•HCON 116 ATH

1 (3) In section 12(c), strike ‘‘7’’ and insert ‘‘6’’.

2 (4) In section 15(a)(2), strike ‘‘8’’ and insert

3 ‘‘7’’.

4 (5) In section 15(b)(1), strike ‘‘, 5(a)(2),’’ and

5 in section 15(b)(2), strike ‘‘8’’ and insert ‘‘7’’.

6 (6) In section 24(b), strike ‘‘13, 14, 15, and

7 16’’ and insert ‘‘9, 10, 11, and 12’’.

Æ