alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.41


    
      
                                                                   Exhibit
      10.41


    November
      14, 2006

    


    


    B.
      M.
      Rankin, Jr.

    300
      Crescent Court, Suite 875

    Dallas,
      Texas 75201

    


    Dear
      Mr.
      Rankin:

    


    The
      purpose of this letter is to confirm the automatic renewal of your Consulting
      Agreement dated January 1, 1991, as amended (the “Agreement”).

    


    Your
      contract will automatically renew for an additional one-year period beginning
      January 1, 2007, and ending December 31, 2007. All other terms and conditions
      of
      the Agreement shall remain the same.

    


    Please
      confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding with respect
      to this matter by signing both originals of this letter and returning one to
      me.

    


    Very
      truly yours,

    


    /s/
      Richard C. Adkerson 

    


    Richard
      C. Adkerson

    Chairman
      of the Board

    President

    FM
      Services Company

    


    


    


    AGREED
      TO AND ACCEPTED

    


    


    BY:
      _/s/
      B.
      M. Rankin, Jr.    November
      15, 2006

    B.
      M.
      Rankin, Jr.   Date
```

[115th Congress Public Law 11]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 75]]

Public Law 115-11
115th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
   Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the 
General Services Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space 
           Administration relating to the Federal Acquisition 
         Regulation. <<NOTE: Mar. 27, 2017 -  [H.J. Res. 37]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Defense, the General Services 
Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (published at 81 Fed. 
Reg. 58562 (August 25, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

    Approved March 27, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 37:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Feb. 2, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 2, 6, considered and passed Senate.
DAILY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS (2017):
            Mar. 27, Presidential remarks.

                                  <all>
```
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Michael S. Amara

The defendant having filed a motion to set aside the judgment under attack and it appearing to this court that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court in the ninth circuit finding the defendant guilty under both counts of the information, it is ordered that unless, on or before August 3, 1964, the state files its brief, judgment shall be entered directing that the judgments of the trial court and the Appellate Division be set aside and the case be remanded with direction to dismiss the information.

*745
      *Arthur L. Spada,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Harry W. Edelberg,*prosecuting attorney, for the state.

Argued June 2

decided June 3, 1964
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6717]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object in the exhibition: “Cezanne and American Modernism,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Montclair Art Museum, Montclair, NJ, from on or about September 12, 2009, until on or about January 3, 2010; The Baltimore Museum of Art, Baltimore, MD, from on or about February 22, 2010, until on or about May 23, 2010, Phoenix Art Museum, Phoenix, AZ, from on or about July 3, 2010, until on or about September 26, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: July 24, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-18334 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### § 1.642(a)(3)-1 Dividends received by an estate or trust.

An estate or trust is allowed a credit against the tax for dividends received on or before December 31, 1964 (see section 34), only for so much of the dividends as are not properly allocable to any beneficiary under section 652 or 662. Section 642(a)(3), and this section do not apply to amounts received as dividends after December 31, 1964. For treatment of the credit in the hands of the beneficiary see § 1.652(b)-1.

[T.D. 6777, 29 FR 17808, Dec. 16, 1964]
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 109 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 109

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the need for raising the 
                    social security earnings limit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 25, 1995

  Mr. Hastert (for himself, Mr. Archer, Mr. Bunning of Kentucky, Mr. 
Armey, Mr. Fox of Pennsylvania, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Flanagan, Mrs. Fowler, 
Mr. Goss, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Foley, Mr. Heineman, and Mr. 
 Barr of Georgia) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the need for raising the 
                    social security earnings limit.

Whereas the Senate has held hearings on the social security earnings limit in 
        1994 and 1995 and the House has held two hearings on the social security 
        earnings limit in 1995;
Whereas the Senate has overwhelmingly passed Sense of the Senate language 
        calling for substantial reform of the social security earnings limit;
Whereas the House of Representatives has overwhelming passed legislation to 
        raise the exempt amount under the social security earnings limit three 
        times, in 1989, 1992, and 1995;
Whereas such legislation is a key provision of the Contract with America;
Whereas the President in his 1992 campaign document ``Putting People First'' 
        pledged to lift the social security earnings limit; and
Whereas the social security earnings limit is a depression-era relic that 
        unfairly punishes working seniors: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the intent of the Congress that legislation will be passed 
before the end of 1995 to raise the social security earnings limit for 
working seniors aged 65 through 69 in a manner which will ensure the 
financial integrity of the social security trust funds and will be 
consistent with the goal of achieving a balanced budget in 7 years.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 101

 Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to certain court orders 
               relating to the desegregation of schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 1995

    Mr. Lipinski (for himself and Mr. Hyde) submitted the following 
   concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to certain court orders 
               relating to the desegregation of schools.
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that each court of the United States 
currently having in force any decree or other order respecting the 
desegregation of schools should, if the decree or order has been in 
effect for more than three years, reconsider that order to determine 
whether the means chosen to achieve desegregation are currently 
effective in the light of any changed facts and to make any 
modifications necessary, consistent with serving the educational needs 
of the children and a rational allocation of the taxpayers' money.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 256 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 256

To authorize the use of funds available to the Committee on Energy and 
                   Natural Resources for consultants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 19 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

   Mr. Johnston (for himself and Mr. Wallop) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

           September 21 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the use of funds available to the Committee on Energy and 
                   Natural Resources for consultants.

    Resolved, That section 9(c) of the Omnibus Committee Funding 
Resolution for 1993 and 1994 (S. Res. 71; 103d Congress, 1st Session) 
is amended by adding before the period the following: ``of which amount 
not to exceed $100,000 may be expended for the procurement of the 
services of individual consultants, or organizations thereof (as 
authorized by section 202(i) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 
1946, as amended)''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8133 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8133

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit the Secretary 
concerned to furnish mortuary services in the case of certain citizens 
  of the United States who die outside of the United States, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2024

  Mr. Kiley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit the Secretary 
concerned to furnish mortuary services in the case of certain citizens 
  of the United States who die outside of the United States, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MILITARY MORTUARY SERVICES FOR CIVILIANS.

    (a) Military Mortuary Services.--Section 1486(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or if the individual arranging for 
        mortuary services and supplies for a decedent believes the 
        local commercial mortuary services and supplies are 
        undesirable,'' after ``prohibitive,'';
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking ``this section'' and 
        inserting ``paragraphs (1) through (5)''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Any person not otherwise covered by this section if a 
        mortuary facility under the jurisdiction of the Secretary 
        concerned has the capacity and personnel to provide such 
        services and supplies.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with 
respect to a death occurring on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, I, Michael Dinkins, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(b) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                                      |  |  |  |       |  |            
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -----------
|    |  |                                                                      |  | 
|By: |  | /s/  Michael Dinkins                                                 |  |  |  | Date: |  | May 4, 2007
|    |  |                                                                      |  |  |  |       |  |            
|    |  | Michael Dinkins Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |       |  |
Name(Last,First,Middle)TitleCompany/OrganizationStreetAddressPhoneEmailWebinar Attendees: Negotiated Rulemaking Meeting for Distribution Transformers Medium- and Low-Voltage Working GroupFaxCityState/ProvZipMeeting Date: 12/2/2011Transformer TechnologyLeaderMetglas, Inc.jerry.allen@metglas.com440 Allied Drive843-349-6810Allen, Ph.D., Jerry843-349-6829ConwaySC29526Engineering ManagerSchneider Electricjay.ballard@us.schneider-electric.com6 Commercial RdN/ABallard, JayN/AHuntingtonIN46750ConsultantNavigantrobert.carmichael@navigantconsulting.com1801 K Street NW,Suite 500202-481-7393Carmichael, Robert202-973-2401WashingtonDC20902Sr. Design EngineerNEMAdale.corel@emerson.com9377 W. Higgins Rd.N/ACorel, DaleN/ARosemontIL60018Energy AnalystNew West Technologies, LLCjeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov1000 IndependenceAve, SWN/AFreeman, JeremiahN/AWashingtonDC20585Sr Electrical EngineerSchneider Electrickenneth.harden@schneiderelectric.com6 Commercial RdN/AHarden, KennethN/AHuntingtonIN46750Consulting EngineerABB Inciqbal.m.hussain@us.abb.com500 Highway 94 WN/AHussain, MohammadN/AJefferson CityMO65101Core and Coil DesignEngineerGE Energy DistributionTransformersbrian.kaja@ge.com7000 West Bert KounsIndustrial LoopN/AKaja, BrianN/AShreverportLA71129Industry Standards ManagerSchneider Electricchad.kennedy@schneider-electric.com8821 Garners FerryRoadN/AKennedy, ChadN/AHopkinsSC29061GM of DistributionEngineering andEmergency ManagementCleco Power LLCJames.Lass@cleco.com2030 Donahue Ferry RdN/ALass, JamesN/APinevilleLA71361ConsultantNavigant Consultingchristopher.lau@navigantconsulting.com1801 K Street NWSuite 500202-481-7524Lau, Christopher202-973-2401WashingtonDC20006-1301VP TechnologyPowersmiths InternationalCorppling@powersmiths.com10 Devon RoadN/ALing, PhilipN/ABramptonONL6T5B5Page1of212/15/201116:33:16Name(Last,First,Middle)TitleCompany/OrganizationStreetAddressPhoneEmailWebinar Attendees: Negotiated Rulemaking Meeting for Distribution Transformers Medium- and Low-Voltage Working GroupFaxCityState/ProvZipMeeting Date: 12/2/2011ConsultantNavigant Consultingzhimei.luo@Navigant.com1801 K Street, NW,Suite 500240-401-5410Luo, Zhimei202-973-2401WashingtonDC20006Principal Engineer, ProductDevelopment &Applications EngineeringAK Steel Corporationrichard.lyke@aksteel.com705 Curtis Street513-425-5709Lyke, Richard F.513-425-5866MiddletownOH45043-0001Senior Product ManagerSiemens Industry Inc.scott.may@siemens.com621 Green Gap ShoresN/AMay, ScottN/ATroyNC27371Director of EngineeringHammond Power SolutionsInc.dpatel@hammondpowersolutions.com595 Southgate DriveN/APatel, DhiruN/AGuelphONN1G3P8Distinguished ScientistEmeritusLawrence Berkeley NationalLaboratoryAHRosenfeld@lbl.govartrosenfeld@gmail.com160 SouthamptonAvenue916-495-2227Rosenfeld, Arthur H.510-486-5454BerkleyCA94707Systems EngineerMemphis Light Gas andWaterjrossetti@mlgw.org220 South MainN/ARossetti, JohnN/AMemphisTN38103Product ManagerFederal Pacificbsmith@federalpacific.com601 Old Airport Rd276-645-8836Smith, RobertN/ABristolVA24201ContactsIncluded:19ocketId:EERE‐2011‐BT‐STD‐0051/EERE‐2010‐BT‐STD‐0048Page2of212/15/201116:33:16
§ 1.457-3 General introduction to eligible plans. ( a ) *Compliance in form and operation.* An eligible plan is a written plan established and maintained by an eligible employer that is maintained, in both form and operation, in accordance with the requirements of §§ 1.457-4 through 1.457-10. An eligible plan must contain all the material terms and conditions for benefits under the plan. An eligible plan may contain certain optional features not required for plan eligibility under section 457(b), such as distributions for unforeseeable emergencies, loans, plan-to-plan transfers, additional deferral elections, acceptance of rollovers to the plan, and distributions of smaller accounts to eligible participants. However, except as otherwise specifically provided in §§ 1.457-4 through 1.457-10, if an eligible plan contains any optional provisions, the optional provisions must meet, in both form and operation, the relevant requirements under section 457 and §§ 1.457-2 through 1.457-10.
( b ) *Treatment as single plan.* In any case in which multiple plans are used to avoid or evade the requirements of §§ 1.457-4 through 1.457-10, the Commissioner may apply the rules under §§ 1.457-4 through 1.457-10 as if the plans were a single plan. See also § 1.457-4(c)(3)(v) (requiring an eligible employer to have no more than one normal retirement age for each participant under all of the eligible plans it sponsors), the second sentence of § 1.457-4(e)(2) (treating deferrals under all eligible plans under which an individual participates by virtue of his or her relationship with a single employer as a single plan for purposes of determining excess deferrals), and § 1.457-5 (combining annual deferrals under all eligible plans).
[T.D. 9075, 68 FR 41234, July 11, 2003]
# C_2014361EN.01001701.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/17

---

Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-593/14)

2014/C 361/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rami Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d'Elzius, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded;

| — | in consequence, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and its subsequent implementing measures, insofar as they concern the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

in consequence, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and its subsequent implementing measures, insofar as they concern the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.

1

---
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 205

Relative to the death of Richard M. Nixon, a former President of the United

States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 25 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of Richard M. Nixon, a former

President of the United States.

Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death of the

Honorable Richard M. Nixon, a former President of the

United States, a former Vice President of the United States,

a former Representative, and former Senator from the State

of California.

Resolved, That in recognition of his illustrious statesmanship, his leadership in national and world affairs, his distinguished public service to his State and his Nation, and as

a mark of respect to one who has held such eminent public
2

SRES 205 ATS

station in life, the Presiding Officer of the Senate appoint a

committee to consist of all the Members of the Senate to

attend the funeral of the former President.

Resolved, That the Senate hereby tender its deep sympathy to the members of the family of the former President

in their sad bereavement.

Resolved, That the Secretary communicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives and transmit a copy

thereof to the family of the former President.

Resolved, That when the Senate recesses today, it recess

as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased.

Æ