alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Službeni list L 272/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0847 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | L 272 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Zakonodavstvo | Godište 63.19. kolovoza 2020. |

ISSN 1977-0847

Službeni list

Europske unije

L 272

Hrvatsko izdanje

Zakonodavstvo

Godište 63.19. kolovoza 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | | Ispravci | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Ispravak Konačnog donošenja (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 izmjene proračuna br. 4 Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2020. ( SL L 254, 4.8.2020. ) | 1 |

Sadržaj

Ispravci

Stranica

*

Ispravak Konačnog donošenja (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 izmjene proračuna br. 4 Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2020. ( SL L 254, 4.8.2020. )

( SL L 254, 4.8.2020. )

1

| HR | Akti čiji su naslovi tiskani običnim slovima su oni koji se odnose na svakodnevno upravljanje poljoprivrednim pitanjima, a općenito vrijede ograničeno razdoblje.
  Naslovi svih drugih akata tiskani su masnim slovima, a prethodi im zvjezdica. |
| --- | --- |

HR

Akti čiji su naslovi tiskani običnim slovima su oni koji se odnose na svakodnevno upravljanje poljoprivrednim pitanjima, a općenito vrijede ograničeno razdoblje.

Naslovi svih drugih akata tiskani su masnim slovima, a prethodi im zvjezdica.

---

Ispravci

| 19.8.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | L 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

L 272/1

---

Ispravak Konačnog donošenja (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 izmjene proračuna br. 4 Europske unije za financijsku godinu 2020.

(
  Službeni list Europske unije L 254 od 4. kolovoza 2020
  .)

Na stranici 36., redak „Ukupno” u stupcu „Proračun 2020. – Plaćanja”:

umjesto:

„
  167 248 223 575
  ”;

treba stajati:

„
  150 948 403 832
  ”.

Na stranici 36., redak „Ukupno” u stupcu „Novi iznos – Plaćanja”:

umjesto:

„
  167 520 721 783
  ”;

treba stajati:

„
  151 220 902 040
  ”.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation for
the period ended January 31, 2005, I, Francis H. Murphy, Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005, fully complies
            with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended
            January 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
            financial condition and results of operations of Biopure
            Corporation.

/s/ Francis H. Murphy
---------------------
Francis H. Murphy
Chief Financial Officer

March 14, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38427-38428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18449]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Issuance of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting 
Standards (SFFAS) 34, ``The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting 
Principles for Federal Entities, Including the Application of Standards 
Issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board''

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of 
Procedure, as amended in April 2004, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued 
Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) 34, The 
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for Federal 
Entities, Including the Application of Standards Issued by the 
Financial Accounting Standards Board.

[[Page 38428]]

    SFFAS 34 incorporates the hierarchy of generally accepted 
accounting principles (GAAP) into the FASAB's authoritative literature. 
The ``GAAAP hierarchy'' consists of the sources of accounting 
principles used in the preparation of financial statements of Federal 
reporting entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP and the 
framework for selecting those principles.
    The statement is available on the FASAB home page http://www.fasab.gov/exposure.html. Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB 
at (202) 512-7350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Payne, Executive Director, at 
(202) 512-7350.

    Authority:  Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463.

    Dated: July 29, 2009.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-18449 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-P
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

Inconnection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofKaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Douglas W. McMinn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| August 15, 2006 | /s/ Douglas W. McMinn                 |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------|
|            | Douglas W. McMinn,                    |
|            | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of the PrincipalFinancial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kaiser GroupHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Marian P. Hamlett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 that:

 

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| November 15, 2004 |   /s/ Marian P. Hamlett |   |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|              | Marian P. Hamlett,                |
|              | Chief Financial Officer           |

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”).  Such certification will not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 185

To congratulate Phil Rizutto on his induction into the Baseball Hall of

Fame.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 8 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. D’AMATO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To congratulate Phil Rizutto on his induction into the

Baseball Hall of Fame.

Whereas Yankee shortstop Phil ‘‘Scooter’’ Rizzuto was born

on September 25, 1917, in Brooklyn, New York;

Whereas the famous Casey Stengel, while manager of the

Brooklyn Dodgers, looked at a young Phil Rizzuto and

dismissed him saying: ‘‘Get yourself a shoe shine box,

kid. You’re too small’’;

Whereas the ‘‘Scooter’’ appeared in 5 All-Star Games,

starred on 10 pennant winning teams, and in 9 World

Series;

Whereas in the 1947 World Series Phil Rizzuto hit .308 and

was a key player in the New York Yankees’ memorable

7-game World Series win over the Brooklyn Dodgers;
2

•SRES 185 IS

Whereas in 1949 Phil Rizzuto hit .275 and fielded .971, leading the New York Yankees in games played, hits, runs,

doubles, and total bases stolen, resulting in his being

named Player of the Year by the baseball writers;

Whereas Phil Rizzuto, as an announcer, has endeared thousands of fans to the great game of baseball; and

Whereas Phil Rizzuto has waited 38 long, hopeful years to

be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York, a dream which has finally been realized:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes the outstanding contributions of

3 Phil Rizutto to the great game of baseball; and

4 (2) congratulates Phil Rizutto on the occasion

5 of his induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame.

6 SEC. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF COPY OF RESOLUTION.

7 The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy

8 of this resolution to Phil Rizutto.

Æ
1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1820

___________

Jeffrey L. Thurman, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Michael Kemna, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: August 26, 2005

Filed: August 31, 2005

___________

Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Jeffrey Thurman appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Having conducted careful de novo review, see Gordon v. Hansen, 168 F.3d 1109,

1113 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam), we conclude that the district court did not err in

dismissing Mr. Thurman’s complaint. We also conclude that the court did not abuse

its discretion in denying Mr. Thurman’s motions to amend his complaint, or in
-2-

refusing to order the production of documents at this early stage of the litigation. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
1

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-2136

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

ZoAnn Brown, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 2, 2008

 Filed: February 4, 2008

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

ZoAnn Brown appeals the 292-month prison sentence the district court1

imposed after she pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or

more of a methamphetamine mixture containing 50 grams or more of actual

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). In a brief filed

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Brown’s counsel seeks permission

to withdraw.
-2-

We conclude that Brown’s within-Guidelines-range sentence is not

unreasonable because nothing in the record indicates the court overlooked a relevant

factor, gave significant weight to an improper factor, or, in weighing the appropriate

factors, made a clear error of judgment. See Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456,

2462-68 (2007) (appellate presumption of reasonableness); United States v. Haack,

403 F.3d 997, 1003-04 (8th Cir. 2005) (reasonableness factors).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to

withdraw, conditioned on counsel informing appellant about the procedures for filing

a petition for rehearing for certiorari, and we affirm the district court’s judgment.

______________________________
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL I. WHITE, an individual,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

ARAMARK,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-55405

D.C. No. 8:12-cv-00922-BRORNB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Beverly Reid O’Connell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Michael I. White appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment 

in his diversity action alleging state law claims arising from his employment. We 

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Vasquez v. County 

of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th Cir. 2004). We may affirm on any basis 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 7 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-55405 

supported by the record. Henry v. Gill Indus., Inc., 983 F.2d 943, 950 (9th Cir. 

1993). We affirm. 

Summary judgment was proper because Aramark’s unopposed motion for 

summary judgment demonstrated the absence of a genuine dispute of material fact 

as to White’s claims. See id. (district court may grant an unopposed motion for 

summary judgment if the movant’s papers are themselves sufficient to support the 

motion and do not on their face reveal a genuine dispute of material fact); see also 

Guz v. Bechtel Nat. Inc., 8 P.3d 1089, 1113-14 (Cal. 2000) (elements of Fair 

Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) discrimination claim); Flait v. N. Am. 

Watch Corp., 4 Cal. Rptr. 2d 522, 528 (Ct. App. 1992) (elements of FEHA 

retaliation claim); Thompson v. City of Monrovia, 112 Cal. Rptr. 3d 377, 390 (Ct. 

App. 2010) (elements of FEHA harassment claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting White’s counsel’s 

motion to withdraw. See Kayes v. Pac. Lumber Co., 51 F.3d 1449, 1465 (9th Cir.

1995) (setting forth standard of review).

We do not consider arguments or claims that were not presented to the 

district court. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

White’s request for appointment of counsel, set forth in his reply brief, is 
3 14-55405 

denied.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 133 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 133

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the calendar day of Tuesday, January 9, 
1996, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 22, 1996, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns on the calendar 
day of Wednesday, January 10, 1996, pursuant to a motion offered by the
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon on Monday, January 22, 1996, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 9 (legislative 
      day, January 5), 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
Order entered January 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00053-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

ANTHONY HILL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX14-90030-V

ORDER

The Court has received the State’s notice of appeal from the trial court’s order granting 

appellee’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. This is an accelerated criminal appeal 

under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31.

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, the clerk’s record containing all the documents related to the pretrial 

application for writ of habeas corpus, including the trial court’s written order ruling on the 

application for writ of habeas corpus.

We ORDER Peri Wood, official court reporter of the 292nd Judicial District Court, to 

file or coordinate the filing, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, of the reporter’s 

record from the hearing on the pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus.
The State’s brief is due by FEBRUARY 18, 2015. Appellee’s brief is due by MARCH 

6, 2015. If any party does not file its brief by the date specified, the appeal will be submitted 

without that party’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1.

The appeal will be submitted, without argument, on April 10, 2015 to a panel consisting 

of Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.2, 39.1.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Brandon Birmingham, Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court; Peri Wood, 

official court reporter, 292nd Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; 

and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
US-16

U

S-385

SD 89

286

284

240

341

CTY-297

C

TY-793 US-16A

413

586

344

407

343.1A

337

684

CTY-343

504

CTY-345

297.1F

410

654

290

781

CTY-344

345.1E

396

285.1D

344.1A

794

345.1H

362

337.1F

349

341.1A

297.1E

345.1J

297.1G

302

240.1E

345.1F

285.1B

297.1H

297.1M

CTY-341

345.1I

343.1H

341.1

781.1

D

A

P310031

284.1E

412

349.1A

342.1F

332

474.1C

344.1G

285.1J 284.1F

781.1C

284.1A

653.1C

352.2C

780

341.1C

406

345.1A

P300226

684 1. A

345.1C

407.1A

297.1B

410.1A

240.1C

407.1F

586.1A

343.1F

781.1H

297.1N

474.1B

410 1. B

586.1B

345.1D

407.1E

412.1A

297.1A

396.1A

302.2B

240.1B

344.1B

474.1A

430

285.1E

342.1G

240.1A

CTY-285

343.1J

352

CTY-653

345.1B

297.1I

286.2A

337.1K

352.2E

344.2F

396.1M

344.1N

342.1K

284.1D

286

CTY-345

Vestal

Transportation System

Proposed Actions μ

Legend

VestalBnd

Road Events

Close to Public (0.9 Miles)

Convert to System Rd (0.6 Miles)

Maintenance

Private Drive

Reconstruct

C - COUNTY

S - STATE

SH - STATE HIGHWAY

Custer City Limits

NFS

PVT 0 0.5 1 2 3 4

Miles
OMB.1845.XXX2.v.1 Table. 05.18.09 

Respondent Type Requirement # of Respondents # of Responses Hours/Response Total Hours 

Section A: Burden by Affected Entity

Federal Government

Individuals or Households

Borrowers SCRA interest cap 34 CFR 685.202 2,250 2,250 0.25 563

Sub-total 2,250 2,250 563

Private Sector

 Business or other for-profits

Institutions - Proprietary - SCRA interest cap 34 CFR 685.202 1,507 1,507 0.08 121

\

Sub-total 1,507 1,507 121

Not-for profits

Institutions - Private -SCRA interest cap 34 CFR 685.202 293 293 0.08 23

Sub-total 0 0 0

Farms

State, Local, or Tribal Governments

Institutions - Public -SCRA interest cap 34 CFR 685.202 450 450 0.08 36

Sub-total for all Institutions 2,250 2,250 180

Total 4,500 4,500 743

Section B: Burden Impact Totals

CURRENT INVENTORY

Current # Respondents 0

Current # of Responses 0

Current Inventory of Hours 0

REVISED TOTAL RESPONDENTS 4,500

REVISED TOTAL RESPONSES 4,500

REVISED TOTAL BURDEN HOURS 743

Difference 743

Section C: Burden by Issue # within the PRA Section of the Regulations TEAMS I & II

TEAM I PRA

1. Section 685.202 - SCRA interest cap (PRA Issue 4) 4,500 4,500 743
Grand Total 4,500 4,500 743
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 161

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Election Law

Guidebook.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 4 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. FORD, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

NOVEMBER 11 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate

Election Law Guidebook.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration hereby is directed to prepare a revised edition of

3 the Senate Election Law Guidebook, Senate Document

4 102–15, and that such document shall be printed as a

5 Senate document.

6 SEC. 2. There shall be printed 600 additional copies

7 of the document specified in section 1 of this resolution

8 for the use of the Committee on Rules and Administration.

Æ