alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 147 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 147

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the fifteenth annual 
               National Peace Officers' Memorial Service.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 147

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall be 
permitted to sponsor a public event, the fifteenth annual National 
Peace Officers' Memorial Service, on the Capitol grounds on May 15, 
1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly 
designate, in order to honor the 155 law enforcement officers who died 
in the line of duty during 1995.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event authorized to be conducted on the 
Capitol grounds under section 1 shall be free of admission charge to 
the public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, 
under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and 
the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The National Fraternal Order of 
Police and its auxiliary shall assume full responsibility for all 
expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the 
event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the National Fraternal Order of Police and 
its auxiliary are authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds such 
stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event authorized to be conducted 
on the Capitol grounds under section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional 
arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8139 

To amend the FAST Act to permit local governments to enter into cooperative 

procurement contracts for the purchase of rolling stock and related 

equipment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2024 

Mr. STAUBER (for himself and Mr. COHEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the FAST Act to permit local governments to 

enter into cooperative procurement contracts for the purchase of rolling stock and related equipment, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cooperation in Local 

5 Procurement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INNOVATIVE PROCUREMENT. 

7 Section 3019 of the FAST Act (49 U.S.C. 5325 note) 

8 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8139 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘or local’’ before ‘‘government’’ 

2 each place it appears; and 

3 (2) in subsection (b)(2) in the paragraph head4 ing by inserting ‘‘OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT’’ before 

5 ‘‘COOPERATIVE PROCUREMENT’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 10.29


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


Mr. and
Mrs. Gordon do not receive fees for their service on the Board of
Directors or committees. Other directors receive an annual fee of $46,000 plus
$1,250 per meeting attended. Each member of the Audit Committee receives an
annual retainer of $7,000 and each member of the Compensation Committee
receives $1,250 per meeting attended. The Chairman of the Audit Committee
receives an additional annual fee of $5,500. 
Board members are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses in
connection with attending meetings, and, in their capacity as ambassadors of
the Company,  receive free samples of the
Company’s products at Halloween and at other times throughout the year.
_



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

A. L. PHARMA INC. SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN

(Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2005)



 
The A. L. Pharma Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of March 31, 2006, as follows:


1.    Section 2.2 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof:

"A participant who becomes employed by an unrelated employer upon the sale of (i) all or substantially all the assets used by the Company in the employing trade or business, or (ii) the Company's interest in the employing subsidiary, shall be deemed to have separated from service on the date immediately preceding the date that such participant becomes an employee of the purchaser, unless the purchaser agrees in connection with the sale to be substituted for the Company as the sponsor of Plan.  Such participant shall be entitled to a distribution in accordance with the terms of Section 2.4."





- END -
III

Calendar No. 464

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 224

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate for the use of the recording

studio and mass mailings with respect to uncontested elections.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. FORD, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

RESOLUTION

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate for the use

of the recording studio and mass mailings with respect

to uncontested elections.

1 Resolved, That (a) paragraph 1 of rule XL of the

2 Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by striking the

3 period at the end and inserting ‘‘, unless the candidacy

4 of the Senator in such election is uncontested.’’.

5 (b) Paragraph 6(a) of rule XL of the Standing Rules

6 of the Senate is amended by striking the period at the

7 end and inserting ‘‘, unless the candidacy of the Senator

8 in such election is uncontested.’’.
Calendar No. 464

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 224

RESOLUTION

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate for the

with respect to uncontested elections.use of the recording studio and mass mailings

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Placed on the calendar
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 214

On health care for Members of Congress and for the American people.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 17 (legislative day, MAY 16), 1994

Mr. WELLSTONE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Labor and Human Resources

RESOLUTION

On health care for Members of Congress and for the

American people.

Whereas the American people want and deserve the same

high quality health care as Members of Congress;

Whereas the best assurance for our constituents that their

health care needs will be protected is to provide them

with the same high quality care we receive at a cost they

can afford;

Whereas Members of Congress, like all Federal employees,

are automatically eligible under the Federal Employee

Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) for health care coverage, with no pre-existing condition exclusions, and employers pay a significant portion of premium costs;
2

SRES 214 IS

Whereas premiums, cost sharing requirements (such as

copayments and deductibles), benefits, and choice of

caregivers vary among the plans offered under FEHBP;

Whereas the health plan that offers the greatest choice of

caregivers, the best schedule of copayments and

deductibles, and the best package of benefits currently

available through FEHBP is also the most expensive

plan;

Whereas Members of Congress have sufficient incomes to

allow them to enroll in the best health plans offered

under FEHBP without spending more than three percent

of their incomes;

Whereas the best health plans are not similarly affordable for

middle- and lower-income Federal employees;

Whereas all FEHBP plans are better than many health care

reform proposals now before Congress in that they offer

a defined package of benefits with an employer contribution;

Whereas improvements are necessary even to the best plan

available under FEHBP, including needed services such

as full coverage for long-term care and dental care, and

improvements that can only be accomplished through

health care reform, such as expanding public health systems and coordinating care among providers; and

Whereas the health and well-being of our Nation, and our

ability to control health care costs by covering everyone

for a broad array of accessible health services that will

keep people healthy, require that Congress enact the best

possible health care reform legislation: Now, therefore, be

it
3

SRES 214 IS

1 Resolved, That the Congress should enact health care

2 reform that guarantees everyone health care as good as

3 the best health care that will be available to Members of

4 Congress.

Æ
1

The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1003

___________

United States of America, * 

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Northern

* District of Iowa.

Chad Orville Felderman, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 10, 2003

Filed: July 2, 2003

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD and RILEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1

District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM

Chad Felderman appeals from his sentence following his conviction for

manufacturing methamphetamine while on pretrial release. See 21U.S.C. § 841(a)(1);

18 U.S.C. § 3147(1).
2

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

-2-

Mr. Felderman asserts that the district court2

 was unaware of its authority to

depart downward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, p.s., and thus committed error when it

refused to do so. See United States v. Lewis, 249 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 2001). We

disagree. Mr. Felderman's counsel alerted the district court to the relevant guideline

section both in a pre-sentence brief and at the sentencing hearing itself. In these

circumstances, we will not presume that the district court was unaware of its authority

simply because it omitted to make a formal recital of its power to depart if the

defendant's criminal history points significantly overstated his actual criminal history.

Cf. United States v. Chase, 174 F.3d 1193, 1195 (11th Cir. 1999).

We also reject Mr. Felderman's contention that the district court erred because

it did not sufficiently state its reasons for choosing the sentence that it imposed. We

agree with Mr. Felderman that where, as here, the guidelines fix a sentencing range

that spans more than twenty-four months, a sentencing court is obliged to state "the

reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence." 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). But here

the district court had read the pre-sentence report and letters that the defendant

submitted, had heard argument from counsel, and had listened to Mr. Felderman's

allocution; and when the court pronounced sentence it specifically said that it had

chosen the sentence "after taking into account ... all the facts and circumstances

surrounding this case, the offense, and [the defendant's] personal history and

characteristics." The court, moreover, stated that it was imposing the sentence "to

afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct and to protect the public." We think

that these pronouncements rather clearly satisfy the requirements of the applicable

statute. Indeed, the court specifically adverted to matters mentioned as relevant in

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B)&(C).

Affirmed.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 180 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 180

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Commending the members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel of 
the Government who served the United States faithfully during the Cold 
                                  War.

Whereas, during the period of the Cold War, from the end of World War II until 
        the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the United States and the 
        Soviet Union engaged in a global military rivalry;
Whereas this rivalry, potentially the most dangerous military confrontation in 
        the history of mankind, has come to a close without a direct superpower 
        military conflict;
Whereas military and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense, personnel 
        in the intelligence community, members of the foreign service, and other 
        officers and employees of the United States faithfully performed their 
        duties during the Cold War;
Whereas many such personnel performed their duties while isolated from family 
        and friends and served overseas under frequently arduous conditions in 
        order to protect the United States and achieve a lasting peace; and
Whereas the discipline and dedication of those personnel were fundamental to the 
        prevention of a superpower military conflict: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 
concurring),That Congress hereby commends, and expresses it gratitude 
and appreciation for, the service and sacrifices of the members of the 
Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the Government who contributed 
to the historic victory in the Cold War.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 6, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Acts provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 22 new standards have been initiated and 9 existing standards are being revised. More details regarding these changes can be found at                     *http://standards.ieee.org/​standardswire/​sba/​5-09.html.*

                    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 1, 2009. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 22, 2009 (74 FR 24034).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-18325 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1320 Gastric acidity test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A gastric acidity test system is a device intended to measure the acidity of gastric fluid. Measurements of gastric acidity are used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with peptic ulcer, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (peptic ulcer due to gastrin-secreting tumor of the pancreas), and related gastric disorders.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 21449, June 8, 1988; 66 FR 38787, July 25, 2001]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11825

Summary Calendar

JAMES DURHAM,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DEE ANDERSON, Sheriff,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CV-1027

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Durham appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint pursuant to the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 

Durham alleged that the defendant was liable for injuries he received when he 

was beaten with a mop handle by another jail inmate. 

As a threshold matter, this court must determine whether it has 

jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11825 Document: 00514209686 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2017
No. 16-11825

2

Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional in a civil 

case. Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

Durham’s notice of appeal, which we consider filed no earlier than the 

date he signed it on December 18, 2016, is untimely from the district court’s 

judgment, which was entered on November 7, 2016. See FED. R. APP. P.

4(a)(1)(A) (a party must file a notice of appeal in a civil case within 30 days of 

the order or judgment). There is no basis to construe his notice of appeal as a 

motion for extension of time under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5). 

Accordingly, his appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Bowles, 551 

U.S. at 214. His motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.

 Case: 16-11825 Document: 00514209686 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2017
Certification Standards Contractors & Specifiers Homeowners Advocacy Resources

Search AHRI Certification Directory 

Home

AHRI > Articles

AHRI, NRDC Align on Phasing Out Certain HFC 

Refrigerants 

AHRI, NRDC Align on Phasing Out Certain HFC Refrigerants 

February 3, 2016 

Contact: Francis Dietz, Vice President, Public Affairs, AHRI 

Direct: 703.600.0355 

Arlington, Va. — The Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) and the 

Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) issued a joint letter to the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) in support of changing the status of certain refrigerants used in 

liquid chillers under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program effective 

January 1, 2025. The two groups took this action following lengthy discussions on the 

importance of moving beyond high-global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants used in 

chillers and consideration of factors such as the safety of alternatives, the continued 

improvement of system efficiency, reasonable product development timelines, and the 

avoidance of market migration. The effective date was negotiated with those factors in mind. 

"This is another example of industry and efficiency advocates working together toward 

environmental progress, while allowing sufficient time and predictability for manufacturers," 

said AHRI President & CEO Stephen Yurek. "We are grateful to the members of AHRI's 

Liquid Chillers Product Section, who worked diligently to reach this agreement," Yurek 

added. 

The EPA is expected to decide in the coming months whether or not to accede to this 

consensus recommendation. 

About AHRI 

The Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) is the trade association 

representing manufacturers of air conditioning, heating, commercial refrigeration, and water 

heating equipment. An internationally recognized advocate for the industry, AHRI develops 

standards for and certifies the performance of many of these products. AHRI's 300+ 

member companies manufacture quality, efficient, and innovative residential and 

commercial air conditioning, space heating, water heating, and commercial refrigeration 

equipment and components for sale in North America and around the world. Visit AHRI at

www.ahrinet.org.

Certification

Standards

Contractors & Specifiers

Homeowners

Advocacy

Resources

News & Events

About Us

Members

Member Login Search Standards | 

AHRI Page 1 of 2

http://www.ahrinet.org/site/A__1143/295/Modules/AHRI/Articles 2/5/2016
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a reviewof the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and ServicingAgreement, dated as of October 14, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables2015-C Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2019. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer**