alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 157

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 1996

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, March 29, 1996, it stand adjourned

4 until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, April 15, 1996, or until noon

5 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem6 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

7 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

8 or adjourns at the close of business on Friday, March 29,

9 1996, Saturday, March 30, 1996, or Sunday, March 31,

10 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader

11 or his designee in accordance with this resolution, it stand

12 recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 15,
2

HCON 157 ATH

1 1996, or until such time on that day as may be specified

2 by the majority leader or his designee in the motion to

3 recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after

4 Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

5 2 of this concurrent resolution whichever occurs first.

6 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the majority

7 leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

8 the minority leader of the House and the minority leader

9 of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and

10 Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in their opin11 ion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Special Emphasis Panel, AA-3 Member Conflict Review.                    

*Date:*                         March 9, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, 2085, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Abraham P. Bautista, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute On Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 2085, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-9737,                         *bautista@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 22, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-1842 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
September 24, 2004 62.5, St. 2

- Page 1 SOUTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS

REGULATION 61

- 62.5

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL STANDARDS

STANDARD NO. 2

AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

The following table constitutes the ambient a ir quality standards for the State of South Carolina. The

analytical methods to be used will be those applicable Federal Reference Methods published in 40 CFR 50,

Appendices A

- N as revised July 18, 1997. In the case of fluorides either the double paper tap e sampler methods

(ASTM D

- 3266

- 79) or the sodium bicarbonate

- coated glass tube and particulate filter method (ASTM D3268

- 78)

may be used.

Pollutant Measuring Interval Micrograms Per Cubic Meter

Unless Noted Otherwise (1) (2)

Sulfur Dioxide 3 hours

24 hours

annual 1300 (4)

365 (4)

80

Total Suspended Particulates Annual Geometric Mean 75

PM 10 24 hours

annual 150 (3)

50 (3)

PM 2.5 (Primary and Secondary

Standards) 24 hours

annual 65 (3)

15 (3)

Carbon Monoxide 1 hour

8 hour 40 mg per cubic meter

10 mg per cubic meter

Ozone 1 hour 0.12 ppm (3)

Ozone 8 hours 0.08 ppm (3)

Gaseous Fluorides (as HF) 12 hr. avg.

24 hr. avg.

1 wk. avg.

1 mo. avg. 3.7

2.9

1.6

0.8

Nitrogen Dioxide annual 100

Lead Calendar Quarterly Mean 1.5

(1) Arithmetic Average except in case of total suspended particulate matter

(2) At 25 0 C and 760 mm Hg.September 24, 2004 62.5, St. 2

- Page 2 (3) Attainment determinations will be made based on the criteria contained in 40 CFR 50 Appendices H, I, K

and N.

(4) Not to be exceeded more than once a year.

R. 61

- 62.5, Standard No. 2 History

- South Carolina State Register :

Vol. 9, Issue No. 5, (Doc. No. 457), May 24, 1985;

Vol. 12, Issue No. 4, (Doc. No. 970), April 22, 1988;

Vol. 13, Issue No. 2, (Doc. No. 868), February 24, 1989.

Vol. 28, Issue No. 9 (Doc. No. 2912), September 24, 2004.
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 162

Commending the entities which were instrumental in developing the ‘‘Friday

Night Live’’ and ‘‘Club Live’’ programs and which have created, are

operating, and are working to expand the ‘‘Rotary Life Club’’ program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 16, 1996

Mr. MILLER of California submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the entities which were instrumental in developing the ‘‘Friday Night Live’’ and ‘‘Club Live’’ programs

and which have created, are operating, and are working

to expand the ‘‘Rotary Life Club’’ program.

Whereas in 1975 the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Council of

Contra Costa County, California (referred to herein as

‘‘ADAC’’) was incorporated as a California non-profit

public benefit corporation with the mission of prevention

and treatment of drug and alcohol abuse in young adults;

Whereas in 1983 the Rotarians Against Substance Abuse

Foundation (referred to herein as ‘‘RASAF’’) was incorporated by 13 Rotary Clubs in Contra Costa County,

California, including the Rotary Clubs of Martinez, Concord, and Pleasant Hill, as a California non-profit public
2

•HCON 162 IH

benefit corporation with a mission similar to that of

ADAC;

Whereas since 1975, ADAC has been instrumental in developing ‘‘Friday Night Live’’ and ‘‘Club Live’’, two oncampus peer programs managed by the State of California that are designed to prevent alcohol and drug abuse,

respectively by high school students and middle school

students;

Whereas since 1983 RASAF has also been instrumental in

developing the Friday Night Live and Club Live programs;

Whereas the Rotary Club of Concord and the First Presbyterian Church of Concord created the first off-campus

Friday Night Live program, now known as ‘‘Rotary Life

Clubs’’, and have operated ‘‘Rotary Life Club #1’’ (also

known as ‘‘Friday Night Live Club #1’’) since 1990 as

a club where high school students can participate in community service projects and other fun events without the

use of drugs or alcohol;

Whereas the partnership of RASAF, ADAC, the Rotary Club

of Concord, and the First Presbyterian Church of Concord is one of the finest examples of private sector entities cooperating to provide substance abuse prevention

programs for young people which emphasize community

service and fun events; and

Whereas RASAF is working with the Salus International

Health Institute and 26,000 Rotary Clubs in 170 countries to expand the Rotary Life Club concept throughout

the world: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Council of
3

•HCON 162 IH

1 Contra Costa County, California, the Rotarians Against

2 Substance Abuse Foundation, the Rotary Club of Con3 cord, and the First Presbyterian Church of Concord be

4 commended for being instrumental in developing the Fri5 day Night Live and Club Live programs, for creating Ro6 tary Life Club #1, and for working to expand the Rotary

7 Life Club concept throughout the world.

Æ
#### § 1.643(a)-1 Deduction for distributions.

The deduction allowable to a trust under section 651 and to an estate or trust under section 661 for amounts paid, credited, or required to be distributed to beneficiaries is not allowed in the computation of distributable net income.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, August 21, 2009.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-18344 Filed 7-28-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 108 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 108

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 19 (legislative day, October 18), 1995

                                Received

                            October 23, 1995

         Referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To correct technical errors in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1594.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1594) to place restrictions 
on the promotion by the Department of Labor and other Federal agencies 
and instrumentalities of economically targeted investments in 
connection with employee benefit plans, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall, in section 5 of the bill, strike ``Nothing'' and 
all that follows through the end of such section and insert the 
following: ``Nothing in this Act is intended to affect the ability of 
the Department of Labor to issue advisory opinions, information 
letters, technical releases, prohibited transaction exemptions, or 
other pronouncements interpreting and applying the fiduciary 
responsibility rules of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 in relation to particular factual situations, or exempting 
specific transactions from the prohibited transaction provisions of 
such Act (pursuant to sections 406 and 408 of such Act (29 U.S.C. 1106, 
1108)).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 17, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
November 5, 2013

Mr. Mark McIntyre

Mentee, LLC

6771 Perimeter Road

Seattle, WA 98108

Dear Mr. McIntyre:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 91, SFAR 87 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can 

not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your September 20, 2013, exemption request on behalf of Mentee, LLC into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2013-0839), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

• The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside 

the United States. 
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send 

your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

As a result of the furlough last month, the FAA was unable to send this letter in a timely 

fashion. However, if we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket 

without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may 

call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Thuy Cooper

Acting Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7509

KEVEN A. MORGAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:19-hc-02153-M)

Submitted: February 25, 2022 Decided: April 20, 2022

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keven A. Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Porter Babb, Sr., Special Deputy Attorney 

General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Keven A. Morgan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Morgan has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FILED AUGUST 23, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          60,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,261
<PP&E>                                       2,984,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (82,769)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,204,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          549,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     330,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,204,311
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,713
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               702,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             204,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (763,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (763,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.31)


</TABLE>
H. Con. Res. 166 Agreed to April 25, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Washington for Jesus 1996

prayer rally.

Whereas One Nation Under God, Inc. has sponsored two previous

prayer rallies entitled Washington for Jesus in the city of

Washington and plans a third such event over a two-day period

on April 29 and 30, 1996;

Whereas public assembly for giving thanks and praying for the

United States is a tradition in this Nation dating from before

the Nation’s founding and commemorated each year by a national

Thanksgiving holiday; and

Whereas the Washington for Jesus prayer rally provides for the

peaceable assembly and public expression of peoples of all faiths

to pray and give thanks for the United States: Now, therefore,

be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION. 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR WASHINGTON FOR JESUS

1996 PRAYER RALLY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—One Nation Under God, Inc. (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor

a public event (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) over

a two-day period on April 29 and 30, 1996 (plus one day before

and one day after the event to fully accommodate for setup, takedown, and cleanup).

(b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The event shall be free of any

admission charge to the public and arranged so as not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, subject to conditions to be prescribed

by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board. The

sponsor shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

(c) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—For the purposes of this

resolution, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol

Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and related structures and equipment as may be required to conduct the event,

subject to approval of the Architect of the Capitol.

(d) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of the Capitol

and the Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such

additional arrangements as may be necessary to carry out the

event consistent with good order, public health, safety, and protection of the Capitol and the Capitol Grounds.
H. Con. Res. 166—2

SEC. 2. SPONSORSHIP OR ENDORSEMENT.

Nothing contained in this resolution shall be construed as an endorsement of the sponsor or the event (or any related activities

or expressions, religious or otherwise). The sponsor shall not represent either directly or indirectly that this resolution or any activity carried out under this resolution in any way constitutes approval

or endorsement by the United States Government, or any of its

agencies, of any activity or expression, religious or otherwise, of

the sponsor or the event.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.