alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

p0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140996

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140996 COA: 288972 Saginaw CC: 07-029831-FC JOHN PAUL TOVAR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 1.614-7 Extension of time for performing certain acts.

Sections 1.614-2 to 1.614-5, inclusive, require certain acts to be performed on or before May 1, 1961 (the first day of the first month which begins more than 90 days after the regulations under section 614 were published in the Federal Register as a Treasury decision). The district director may, upon good cause shown, extend for a period not exceeding 6 months the period within which such acts are to be performed, and shall, if the interests of the Government would otherwise be jeopardized thereby, grant such an extension only if the taxpayer and the district director agree in writing to a corresponding or greater extension of the period prescribed for the assessment of the tax, or in the case of taxable years described in section 614(c)(3)(E), the assessment of the tax resulting from the exercise or change in an election.

[T.D. 6561, 26 FR 3523, Apr. 25, 1961]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPT. 30, 1996 AND THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPT. 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                       380
<INVENTORY>                                        405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,412
<PP&E>                                          49,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,462)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,115
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,754
<SALES>                                         13,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,790
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (121)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,582)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,582)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,582)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)
        

</TABLE>
III

Calendar No. 695

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 265

To express the sense of the Senate concerning district council elections in

Hong Kong on September 18, 1994.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. DECONCINI) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. PELL without amendment

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate concerning district council

elections in Hong Kong on September 18, 1994.

Whereas the United States strongly supports the development

of effective, functioning democratic institutions worldwide;

Whereas the government of Hong Kong successfully conducted its first District Board elections on September

18th;

Whereas voter registration for the September 18th district

council elections in Hong Kong was higher than ever before;
2

SRES 265 IS

Whereas the number of candidates running for District

Board positions is higher than in any previous election in

Hong Kong’s history;

Whereas Hong Kong has recently taken bold strides to increase democracy and expand the rule of law;

Whereas the rule of law is essential to the effective functioning of a market economy;

Whereas Hong Kong currently is one of the world’s leading

market economies;

Whereas recent electoral reforms in Hong Kong are consistent with the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law for

Hong Kong;

Whereas Hong Kong is an important friend and trading partner of the United States;

Whereas the people of the United States and Hong Kong

have long maintained close, friendly ties;

Whereas the stability of Hong Kong and the continuance of

its special status are of great importance to the United

States;

Whereas, to be effective, the rule of law must be firmly based

upon the consent of those it governs; and

Whereas one of the most effective methods to protect against

corruption is to ensure a government that is accountable

to those it governs: Now, therefore be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate:

2 (1) Free and fair elections are an essential com3 ponent of a stable, democratic government in Hong

4 Kong that is free from corruption.
3

SRES 265 IS

1 (2) The people of Hong Kong should be con2 gratulated for the recent success of the District

3 Board elections and for the progress of democratic

4 reforms that support the rule of law in Hong Kong.

5 (3) The United States should make every effort

6 to support the progress of democratic reforms in

7 Hong Kong and to encourage all parties to protect

8 these gains as the 1997 transition approaches.

Calendar No. 695

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 265

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate concerning disber 18, 1994. trict council elections in Hong Kong on SeptemSEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Ehave, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge that:



| | 1. | The accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 16, 2017



|/s/ Scott Woodrow       | 
|----------------------- | 
|Scott Woodrow           | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 



The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for the purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C. 

### ZJj)**,:(~**

### -2 p 

### 2:5Ll

Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) DOT-OST-1996-1203

MOTION OFAMERICANAIRLINES, INC.**FO~**

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12 Communications with respect to this document shouldbe sent to: FRANCIS C. HEIL Managing Director
- Legal and Government Affairs American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.com March 30, 2015BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D . C. Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) DOT-OST-1996-1203

MOTION OFAMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12 AmericanAirlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 4Q2014, be accorded confidential treatment andwithheld frompublic disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment is requested pertains toAmerican's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report electronically to http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office ofAirline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-yearperiod to similar data filed byAmerican. For the reasons stated in that letter, the current submission should also receive confidential treatment for 10 years.2 - WHEREFORE, Americanmoves that the schedule being submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be withheld frompublic disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years.

March 30, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil Managing Director
- Legal and Government Affairs AmericanAirlines, Inc.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 21

To authorize testimony and to authorize representation by the Senate Legal

Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony and to authorize representation by

the Senate Legal Counsel.

Whereas, the parties in Willey v. Riley, et al., numbered LA

18962, pending in the Iowa district court for Linn County, seek the deposition testimony of Senator Grassley;

Whereas, by rule VI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no

Senator shall absent himself from the service of the Senate without leave;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken

from such control or possession but by permission of the

Senate;
2

SRES 21 ATS

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges

of the Senate;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and

288c(a)(2)), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent Members of the Senate with respect to requests

for testimony made to them in their official capacities:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Senator Grassley is authorized to tes2 tify at a deposition in Willey v. Riley, et al., case numbered

3 LA 18962 (Iowa D.Ct.), except when his attendance at

4 the Senate is necessary for the performance of his legisla5 tive duties, and except concerning matters for which a

6 privilege should be asserted.

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to

8 represent Senator Grassley in connection with his testi9 mony in the case of Willey v. Riley, et al.

Æ
## T~EATTORNEY GENERAL OF ?t-EXAS PRICEDANIEL ATTORNEYGENERALthe caption. Montgomery C’ountywas namedin the bedy or ,the law., but masnot aWed in the caption,. The Court .said:

-0 da find, however, that in the body or the Bill there appears for the first time the County or Montgomery as one entitled to rote upon such local issue. By reason. 0r the railure to give notice in the caption that Montgomery was to be added to such list of counties, we think the inclusion of ,MontgomergCounty thereinwas wid **and** inerrmtire.~~ The case of WardCattle and Pasture Company vs. **Qarpe&te&?, 109**  Ter. **103, 200**  S.W. **521;** oited in your letter, is via ,acoord~with the Winslow oase. In that case Matagorda County .*&8 Ineluded in, ArQale 6964 but ‘was omittea from the later Aot without mentionfng the omission in the caption& The bomt held that the omfesion W that county f%m the caption, was ,deceptiye and did not Cake the achutf out of the p~risloks ,or thenlew.

All laws which arrested tba pertimqt atetus or Qrshge County were superseded by the last ,amendmentof ArtiOlij '@9,64, which was passed 6s HouseBill No. 150, Chaptdr 2&i,Acts;of the 4Sth Legisletura, p. 393, b&y “AmAct amendgy AptidLe 6954 or the Perised E+itutes or Texas or 19.23~~

**as** the s6mehas;b,eenheretofore aaeadedso 7s to permit oertafn oountfes to hare a stork law electis&~ and dealsrimg; an emqrigenoj.n mat asptia* is strifioieat to uxprera the smbjeot or the b&11, (Is required by Seation 35 ai Artiole III of the State ~omstitu~ioa. Oreage County is mot ramed,Jn either the aaptisn sr b,od,yof that amendment *hiah beaame effective May7, 1943.

Weare of the opinion that Orange County is not authorlse& to hold an election to determine whether horses, mules, ,jacks, jennets and aattle mayrun at large in the oatuty or in amysub-division of it, by reason of its oxolurioa .fyomthe amendmentor Article 6954, by the 4Bth Legislature in lW3i is immaterial ,. Prior legiela~tlre history on the point

. Orange County having been omitted ir.mmthe title madalro iron the body of Housebill MO. 150, dote of the **48th** Legislature, p. ‘393, amending Ar- $i,ole 3854, v. a. s., whlah authorizes namedoounties to hoLd eleotioarto determine if horses,

*

,. .

Honorable Orahaii'BZuce - Page 3



### BP Amfste6t

,.. . ’ ,*
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Mine Safety and Health Administration


Petitions for Modification; Amendment

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice; amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) published a 
document in the Federal Register of May 20, 2009, concerning a petition 
for modification of an existing safety standard at 30 CFR 75.503 (30 
CFR 18.35). The petitioner requests that Docket number M-2009-008-C be 
amended to reflect the correct company name of Excel Mining LLC, Mine 
No. 3, MSHA No. 15-08079.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, 202-693-9447 or Roslyn 
Fontaine, 202-693-9475.

Amendment

    The Federal Register of May 20, 2009, page 23745, third column, 
should be amended to read: Excel Mining, LLC.

    Dated: July 28, 2009.
Patricia W. Silvey,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances.
[FR Doc. E9-18314 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P
#### § 1.641(c)-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the major captions contained in § 1.641(c)-1.

## § 1.641(c)-1Electing small business trust.

(a) In general.

(b) Definitions.

(1) Grantor portion.

(2) S portion.

(3) Non-S portion.

(c) Taxation of grantor portion.

(d) Taxation of S portion.

(1) In general.

(2) Section 1366 amounts.

(3) Gains and losses on disposition of S stock.

(4) State and local income taxes and administrative expenses.

(e) Tax rates and exemption of S portion.

(1) Income tax rate.

(2) Alternative minimum tax exemption.

(f) Adjustments to basis of stock in the S portion under section 1367.

(g) Taxation of non-S portion.

(1) In general.

(2) Dividend income under section 1368(c)(2).

(3) Interest on installment obligations.

(4) Charitable deduction.

(h) Allocation of state and local income taxes and administration expenses.

(i) Treatment of distributions from the trust.

(j) Termination or revocation of ESBT election.

(k) Effective date.

(l) Examples.

[T.D. 8994, 67 FR 34394, May 14, 2002]
Observer Log of sUAS flights

DATE / TIME LOCATION PILOT WX 

CONDITIONS

AUTOPILOT 

SOFTWARE 

CONFIG 

VERSION

RC 

CONTROL 

BAND 

(Ghz)

VIDEO 

BAND 

(Ghz)

5/30/2014 1430 Evergreen, 

CO

Sam Spade W 5-10 APM Plane 

3.2.3

2.4 N/A
TELEMETRY 

BAND (Ghz)

AIRCRAFT MOTOR PROPELLER BATTERY 

TYPE

Batt Used 

by OSD 

(mah)

Batt actual 

Recharged 

(mah)

0.9 Ritewing Z3 SS 1300kv 10x8 fixed 4s x1 3300 3150
Flight Time 

(minutes)

15
NOTES

SAMPLE: Sky was clear with no clouds. Mission aircraft followed waypoints precisely, accurate imagery was 

captured. Only a single flight was necessary capture the entire area.
#### §§ 1.401-4-1.401-5 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997

<CASH>                                         3,146
<SECURITIES>                                  40,858
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,315
<INVENTORY>                                    2,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              57,859
<PP&E>                                        14,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                64,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,627
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      59,021
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  64,043
<SALES>                                       12,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12,572
<CGS>                                          3,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,831
<INCOME-TAX>                                     110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .15
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         119,195                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  536,236                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,025                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,023,700                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,724,072                       0
<PP&E>                                         131,517                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,884                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,895,513                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,147,795                       0
<BONDS>                                        602,229                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           587                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,432                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,895,513                       0
<SALES>                                      2,385,171               4,759,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,385,171               4,759,906
<CGS>                                        2,262,185               4,525,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,262,185               4,525,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,506                 147,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,853                   2,630
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,805                  23,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,675                  62,645
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,456                  24,531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,219                  38,114
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,219                  38,114
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40                     .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39                     .74


</TABLE>