alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [RT01-99-000, RT01-99-001, et al.]
 Regional Transmission Organizations
RT01-99-000, RT01-99-001, RT01-99-002 and RT01-99-003.Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, 
                            *et al*
RT01-86-000, RT01-86-001 and RT01-86-002.( print page 38181)New York Independent System Operator, Inc., 
                            *et al*
RT01-95-000, RT01-95-001 and RT01-95-002.PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 
                            *et al*
RT01-2-000, RT01-2-001, RT01-2-002 and RT01-2-003.PJM Interconnection, L.L.C
RT01-98-000.ISO New England, Inc. New York Independent System Operator, Inc
RT02-3-000.
 Notice July 27, 2009. Take notice that PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., New York Independent System Operator, Inc. and ISO New England, Inc. have posted on their Internet Web sites information updating their progress on the resolution of RTO seams. Any person desiring to file comments on this information should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such comments should be filed on or before the comment date. Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “e-Filing” link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. *Comment Date:*
                     August 18, 2009. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. E9-18306 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### § 1.528-5 Source of income test.

An organization cannot qualify as a homeowners association under section 528 for a taxable year unless 60 percent or more of its gross income for such taxable year is exempt function income as defined in § 1.528-9. The determiniation of whether an organization meets the provisions of this section shall be made after the close of the organization's taxable year.

[T.D. 7692, 45 FR 26322, Apr. 18, 1980]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted
     from the financial statements for Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P.
     and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
     statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854926
<NAME>                        Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,931,144
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,209,256
<PP&E>                                         143,151,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,318,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,079,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,542,513
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,536,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,079,149
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,123,396
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,167,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,673,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,717,352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,717,352)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (49.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
# Az Európai Unió L 272/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0731 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | L 272 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Jogszabályok | 63. évfolyam2020. augusztus 19. |

ISSN 1977-0731

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

L 272

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Jogszabályok

63. évfolyam2020. augusztus 19.

---

| Tartalom | | Helyesbítések | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Az Európai Unió 2020. évi pénzügyi évre vonatkozó 4. számú költségvetés-módosításának végleges elfogadása (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 ( HL L 254., 2020.8.4. ) | 1 |

Tartalom

Helyesbítések

Oldal

*

Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Az Európai Unió 2020. évi pénzügyi évre vonatkozó 4. számú költségvetés-módosításának végleges elfogadása (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 ( HL L 254., 2020.8.4. )

( HL L 254., 2020.8.4. )

1

| HU | Azok a jogi aktusok, amelyek címe normál szedéssel jelenik meg, a mezőgazdasági ügyek napi intézésére vonatkoznak, és rendszerint csak korlátozott ideig maradnak hatályban.
  Valamennyi más jogszabály címét vastagon szedik, és előtte csillag szerepel. |
| --- | --- |

HU

Azok a jogi aktusok, amelyek címe normál szedéssel jelenik meg, a mezőgazdasági ügyek napi intézésére vonatkoznak, és rendszerint csak korlátozott ideig maradnak hatályban.

Valamennyi más jogszabály címét vastagon szedik, és előtte csillag szerepel.

---

Helyesbítések

| 2020.8.19. | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | L 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2020.8.19.

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

L 272/1

---

Helyesbítés a következőhöz: Az Európai Unió 2020. évi pénzügyi évre vonatkozó 4. számú költségvetés-módosításának végleges elfogadása (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja L 254., 2020. augusztus 4.
  )

A 36. oldalon, az „Összesen” sorban, a „2020. évi költségvetés – Kifizetések” oszlopban:

a következő szövegrész:

„
  167 248 223 575
  ”

helyesen:

„
  150 948 403 832
  ”.

A 36. oldalon, az „Összesen” sorban, az „Új összeg – Kifizetések” oszlopban:

a következő szövegrész:

„
  167 520 721 783
  ”

helyesen:

„
  151 220 902 040
  ”.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11242 Summary Calendar

DEBORAH BURNS

Plaintiff - Appellant

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER CARSWELL; OKLAHOMA TRANSFER CENTER - PAULDING COUNTY JAIL, DALLAS, GEORGIA; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN MATTHEWS, Officer; J.B. BOGAN, Warden; C.L. BROWN, Captain; JORLENE LONG HUDSON, also known as first Name Unknown Long, also known as First Name Unknown Hudson; SANDRA E. BOYD, also known as First Name Unknown Boyd; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN STILLION, Officer; BARBARA WIRZFELD, also known as First Name Unknown Witzell, also known as First Name Unknown Wirzfeld; KATHLEEN HAWK, Director of Bureau of Prisons; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN GILLIUM; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN COOPER, Officer; L. AUSTIN, Unit officer; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN BASS, Officer; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN KAISER, Officer; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN COLE, Officer; FIRST NAME UNKNOWN GONZALEZ, Officer; ALTON APPLEWHITE, also known as Applewhite

Defendants - Appellees

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CV-135-Y

-------------------- July 6, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Deborah Burns appeals the district court’s dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrativeNo. 00-11242 -2- remedies. Burns contends that her claim of sexual assault is not a prison conditions claim for purposes of applying 42 U.S.C. § 1997e’s exhaustion requirement. Because this court has held that 42 U.S.C. § 1997e’s exhaustion requirement applies to similar types of claims, Burns’ argument is rejected. See Wendell v. Asher , 162 F.3d 887, 889-91 (5th Cir. 1998). Burns has also filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. Because Burns fails to identify any exceptional circumstances that would warrant such appointment, her motion is denied. See Santana v. Chandler , 961 F.2d 514, 515 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
p110635c.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0635 P11-0636

Focus Ready Draft 10/6/2011

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: The Dow Chemical Company

USE: 

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: chemical resistant gloves (preferred: butyl

rubber, chlorinated polyethylene, polyethylene, ethyl

vinyl alcohol laminate / acceptable: neoprene,

nitrile/butadiene, polyvinyl chloride, Viton) / chemical

goggles / use only with adequate ventilation. Provide

general and/or local exhaust ventilation to control

airborne levels below the exposure guidelines. Local

exhaust ventilation may be necessary for some operations.

Respirator: Atmospheric levels should be maintained below

the exposure guideline. When atmospheric levels may

exceed the exposure guideline, use an approved

air-purifying respirator equipped with an organic vapor

sorbent and a particle filter. For situations where the

atmospheric levels may exceed the level for which an

air-purifying respirator is effective, use a

positive-pressure air-supplying respirator (air line or

self-contained breathing apparatus). For emergency

response or for situations where the atmospheric level is

unknown, use an approved positive-pressure self-contained

breathing apparatus or positive-pressure air line with

auxiliary self-contained air supply. The following should

be effective types of air-purifying respirators: Organic

vapor cartridge with a particulate pre-filter.

Health Effects: Causes eye irritation. May cause skin

irritation. Animal studies have shown that skin contact

with isocyanates may play a role in respiratory

sensitization. May cause allergic respiratory reaction.

May be harmful if inhaled. May react with water. Elevated

temperatures can cause hazardous polymerization.Toxic

fumes may be released in fire situations. May cause

cancer.

TLV/PEL:

CRSS :

Chemical Name: 

Page 1
p110635c.eng

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (09/23/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3B1T1 PMN: P1B1T1; Hyd Pdt: P3B1T1

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

Page 2
p110635c.eng

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

 

Yes

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0635 P11-0636

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

Page 3
p110635c.eng

Page 4
United States

Department of

Agriculture

Forest

Service

Wallowa-Whitman

National Forest

Whitman Ranger District

P.O. Box 907

Baker City, OR 97814

Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper 

File Code: 1950

Date: September 4, 2012

Dear Interested Parties:

I appreciate your interest in the supplemental analysis for the North Fork Burnt River Mining Project

located on the Whitman Ranger District of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. Based on review of the 

completed 2012 Final Supplemental EIS (FSEIS), I have signed the 2012 Record of Decision (ROD) 

describing the selected alternative for this analysis. The FSEIS, ROD, and associated documentation are 

now available on the web at http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=18925.

In 2004, the Whitman District Ranger for the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest signed the 2004 North Fork 

Burnt River Record of Decision (2004 ROD) to authorize the approval of 49 mining Plans of Operation in 

the North Fork Burnt River Watershed. The 2004 decision was subsequently litigated in Hells Canyon 

Preservation Council et al. v. Haines, CV 05-1057-PK, resulting in a court order and opinion dated August 

4, 2006 (HCPC 2006). 

The 2012 FSEIS and ROD address the inadequacies identified in HCPC 2006. These inadequacies include 

consistency with 1) section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 2) section 313 of the CWA, 3) the Organic 

Act and its regulations, 4) INFISH standard MM-1 (buffer widths), 5) INFISH standard MM-2 (roads), 6) 

INFISH standard MM-2 (settling/processing ponds), and 7) exceptions to meeting Forest Plan open-road 

density guidelines.

The 2012 ROD documents the decision and rationale for selection of the components in Alternative 4 from 

the FSEIS that were either not included in the 2004 ROD, or have been revised or updated to address the 

inadequacies identified by HCPC 2006. The 2012 ROD also documents the decision and rationale for 

incorporating all updated or new information included in the 2012 FSEIS.

This decision is subject to appeal and administrative review, pursuant to regulations at 36 CFR 215. Written 

notice of appeal must be postmarked or received by the Appeal Deciding Officer within 45 days of the date 

of publication of notice regarding this decision in the Baker City Herald (Baker City, Oregon). Additional 

information regarding appeal rights and procedures can be found in the ROD. Only individuals or 

organizations who submitted comments during the comment period ending November 8, 2010 may appeal.

If you have questions regarding this project or the associated documents, please contact Sophia Millar, 

Environmental Coordinator, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, at 541-263-1735 or smillar@fs.fed.us.

Again, thank you for your interest in the North Fork Burnt River Mining Project, and your continued interest 

in management of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 

Sincerely,

JEFF TOMAC

District Ranger

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific Inc on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard Osser Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Leonard Osser
                                        -----------------
                                        Leonard Osser
                                        Chief Executive Officer

November 11, 2003


                                       39
1 COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF O. C. V. AND M.

S. V., JR.

,

Appellant, §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 355

- C V

Appeal from the

383 rd D istrict Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2012DCM10912 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion asserting there are inaccuracies in the

reporter’s record and to submit the matter to the trial court. According to Appellant’s motion,

the parties have been unable to resolve the dispute. The motion is GRANTED. The appeal is

abated and the trial court is directed to conduct a hearing to determine whether the reporter’s

record accurately reflects the following:

1. Appellant’s request to offer Exhibit A into evidence;

2. whether Exhibit A was admitted into evidence; and

3. Appellant’s testimony regarding Exhibit A.

If the trial court determines that the record is inaccurate, it shall order the court reporter to

conform the reporter’s record , including text and any exhibits, to what occurred in the trial court,

and to file certified corrections in the appellate court. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 34.6(e)(2). If the trial

court determines that the reporter’s record is accurate, it shall state same in it s written finding s

.2

The trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County, Texas,

on or before May 22, 2016. The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s

record containing the findings and forward the sa me to this Court on or before June 6, 2016.

Further, the transcription of the hearing shall be prepared, certified and filed with this Court on

or before June 6, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 2 nd day of April , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
LASHIFY, INC., Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

QINGDAO HOLLYREN COSMETICS CO., LTD, dba Hollyren , QINGDAO XIZI INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO., LTD, d b a Xizi Lashes , QIANGDAO LASHBEAUTY COSMETIC CO., LTD, dba Worldbeauty
, KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC., ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC., WALMART, INC., CVS PHARMACY, INC. , ARTEMIS FAMILY BEGINNINGS, INC., dba Lilac Street
, ALICIA ZENG
, Intervenors

______________________

2022

- 1566

______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337

- TA

- 1226.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ Case: 22-1566 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 06/01/2022LASHIFY
, INC

. v. ITC 2

Before L OURIE
, T ARANTO
, and H UGHES
, Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R

Appellee International Trade Commission moves to dismiss Appeal No. 2022

- 1566 as premature. ECF No. 21. Lashify , Inc. opposes dismissal and requests instead that the appeal be held in abeyance . ECF No. 26.

Lashify filed a notice of appeal seeking review of the Commission’s decision not to review certain non

- infringement findings regarding U.S. Patent No. 10 ,721,984

. ECF No. 1

- 2 at 2. But even Lashify ’s notice characterize d the Commission’s decision as not “final” for purposes of judicial review under Tessera, Inc. v. ITC , 646 F.3d 1357, 1367

– 69 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (citing 19 U.S.C. § 1337(c))

, based on the Co mmission’s pending consideration of certain other issues in the investigation . ECF No. 1

- 2 at 4. We agree with the parties that, under the circumstances of this case, we lack jurisdiction over Lashify’s appeal because there has been no final determinatio n

. Having considered the parties’ arguments, the court determines that dismissal (rather than a stay) is appropriate in this case

, see, e.g. , A & J Mfg., LLC

v. ITC

, 584 F. App’x 933 (Fed. Cir. 2014), but the court will allow Lashify to reinstate its appeal if, within 60 days of the entry of this order, it appeals from a final determination

. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 22-1566 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 06/01/2022LASHIFY
, INC

. v. ITC 3

(1) The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, subject, however, to reinstatement under the same docket number without payment of any additional filing fee if, within 60 days of th e entry of th is order, Lashify appeals from the entry of a final determination. The mandate shall issue simultaneously with this order

. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs

.

June 1 , 2022 Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 1, 2022 Case: 22-1566 Document: 30 Page: 3 Filed: 06/01/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,094,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  625,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    224,986
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,763,388
<PP&E>                                         399,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,599,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,110,203
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,100
<COMMON>                                        32,030
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,599,218
<SALES>                                        612,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               612,780
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,680,828
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,938,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,950,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,950,950)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)



</TABLE>