alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.15





|(logo) NTS NATIONAL
        TAX SEARCH, LLC | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900
        Chicago, IL 60601
        (312) 233-6440
|------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA



For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, National Tax Search,
LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).



National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”) is responsible for assessing
compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”)
with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS
has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.
Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect
to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d)
of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report.
The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform
Transactions”).



NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.



Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has issued an attestation report on ’the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.





National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 18, 2016
#### § 1.544-5 Convertible securities.

Under section 544(b) outstanding securities of a corporation such as bonds, debentures, or other corporate obligations, convertible into stock of the corporation (whether or not convertible during the taxable year) shall be considered as outstanding stock of the corporation. The consideration of convertible securities as outstanding stock is subject to the exception that, if some of the outstanding securities are convertible only after a later date than in the case of others, the class having the earlier conversion date may be considered as outstanding stock although the others are not so considered, but no convertible securities shall be considered as outstanding stock unless all outstanding securities having a prior conversion date are also so considered. For example, if outstanding securities are convertible in 1954, 1955 and 1956, those convertible in 1954 can be properly considered as outstanding stock without so considering those convertible in 1955 or 1956, and those convertible in 1954 and 1955 can be properly considered as outstanding stock without so considering those convertible in 1956. However, the securities convertible in 1955 could not be properly considered as outstanding stock without so considering those convertible in 1954 and the securities convertible in 1956 could not be properly considered as outstanding stock without so considering those convertible in 1954 and 1955. For the restriction on the applicability of the rule of this section, see paragraph (b) of § 1.544-1.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 74 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 74

 Expressing the opposition of the Senate to the imposition of a fee on 
  or in-kind storage diversion requirement for imported crude oil and 
                      refined petroleum products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 25 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

Mr. Pell (for himself, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Dodd, 
Mr. Kerry, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Smith, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Gregg, 
  Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Lautenberg, and Mr. Roth) submitted the following 
       resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the opposition of the Senate to the imposition of a fee on 
  or in-kind storage diversion requirement for imported crude oil and 
                      refined petroleum products.

Whereas a fee on imported crude oil and refined petroleum products, whether in 
        the form of a levy for general revenues, a levy to fund specific 
        programs, or an in-kind storage requirement of a percentage of imported 
        crude oil and refined petroleum products, and whether fixed or variable, 
        would directly increase the costs of production and manufacturing for 
        industries that use petroleum products;
Whereas the increased production costs resulting from such a fee, levy, or 
        diversion would impair the ability of industries to compete in 
        international markets;
Whereas such a fee, levy, or diversion would directly increase the costs to 
        other users of petroleum products, including those dependent on oil and 
        oil products to heat their homes and those who use electricity generated 
        from oil; and
Whereas the increased costs to industry and to homeowners from such a fee, levy, 
        or diversion would not be uniformly distributed among geographic regions 
        or economic sectors, but would be borne disproportionately by the 
        regions and economic sectors that are most dependent on petroleum 
        products: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that neither the 
President nor the Congress should impose fees, levies, or diversion 
requirements on imported crude oil and refined petroleum products.

                                 <all>
```
```

[115th Congress Public Law 29]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 133]]

Public Law 115-29
115th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Providing for the appointment of Roger W. Ferguson as a citizen regent 
of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. <<NOTE: Apr. 19, 
                        2017 -  [S.J. Res. 36]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy of the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 
Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the term 
of Robert P. Kogod of the District of Columbia on May 5, 2017, is filled 
by the appointment of Roger W. Ferguson of the District of 
Columbia. <<NOTE: Effective date.>>  The appointment is for a term of 6 
years, beginning on May 6, 2017, or the date of the enactment of this 
joint resolution, whichever occurs later.

    Approved April 19, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.J. Res. 36:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Mar. 27, considered and passed Senate.
            Apr. 6, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
§ 1.6072-3 Income tax due dates postponed in case of China Trade Act corporations. ( a ) With respect to a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1948, and ending before October 1, 1956, the income tax return of any corporation organized under the China Trade Act of 1922 (15 U.S.C. ch. 4), as amended, shall not become due until December 31, 1956, provided that during any such taxable year conditions in China have been generally so unsettled as to militate against the normal commercial operations and corporate activities of such corporation. However, the postponement of the due date shall not apply to an income tax return for any such taxable year if: ( 1 ) The books of account and business records are available so as to permit the filing of a proper return, and the corporation has otherwise been in a position to carry on its commercial operations and corporate activities and to make a proper distribution of its earnings or profits, if any, so as to permit the certification required by section 941(b); or
( 2 ) All the commercial operations and corporate activities of such corporation have been carried on in Hong Kong, Macao, or Taiwan (Formosa).
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of this section, the postponed due date referred to in this section will apply if a corporation satisfies the Commissioner that special circumstances exist, related to the unsettled conditions in China, which warrant such postponement.
( c ) The postponed due date provided for in this section is expressly subject to the power of the Commissioner to extend, as in other cases, the time for filing the income tax return. See section 6081 and the regulations thereunder.
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Case Number: P040141 Assessor: Wormell ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks: Revised engineer report (04/15/04)

Consumer use expected?POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040141POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P040141POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Case Number: P040141 Assessor: Wormell ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks: Revised engineer report (04/15/04)POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Case Number: P040141 Assessor: Wormell ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 3 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040141
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5808 Transcranial magnetic stimulator for headache. ( a ) *Identification.* A transcranial magnetic stimulator device for headache is a device that delivers brief duration, rapidly alternating, or pulsed, magnetic fields that are externally directed at spatially discrete regions of the brain to induce electrical currents for the treatment of headache.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Appropriate analysis/testing must demonstrate electromagnetic compatibility, electrical safety, and thermal safety.
( 2 ) Appropriate verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed on the device software and firmware.
( 3 ) The elements of the device that contact the patient must be assessed to be biocompatible.
( 4 ) Non-clinical testing data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. This includes full characterization of the magnetic pulse output and resulting magnetic field map. This also includes characterization of the sound level of the device during use.
( 5 ) Clinical testing must demonstrate that the device is safe and effective for treating headache in the indicated patient population.
( 6 ) The physician and patient labeling must include the following: ( i ) A summary of the clinical performance testing, including any adverse events and complications.
( ii ) The intended use population in terms of the types of headaches appropriate for use with the device.
( iii ) Information on how to report adverse events and device malfunctions.
( iv ) A diagram or picture depicting the proper placement of the device on the user.
[78 FR 38458, July 8, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          87,007                  87,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  462,427                 462,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,158                  30,158
<INVENTORY>                                    959,308                 959,308
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,512,922               1,512,922
<PP&E>                                         118,386                 118,386
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,991                  52,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,631,171               1,631,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          942,040                 942,040
<BONDS>                                        630,540                 630,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           544                     544
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,469                  47,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,631,171               1,631,171
<SALES>                                      4,497,912               2,218,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,497,912               2,218,354
<CGS>                                        4,279,293               2,105,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,279,293               2,105,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,608                  74,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,383                   5,317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,692                  12,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,319                  26,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,626                  10,367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,693                  16,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,693                  16,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64                     .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63                     .33
        

</TABLE>
§ 1.528-1 Homeowners associations. ( a ) *In general.* Section 528 only applies to taxable years of homeowners associations beginning after December 31, 1973. To qualify as a homeowners association an organization must either be a condominium management association or a residential real estate management association. For the purposes of Section 528 and the regulations under that section, the term *homeowners association* shall refer only to an organization described in section 528. Cooperative housing corporations and organizations based on a similar form of ownership are not eligible to be taxed as homeowners associations. As a general rule, membership in either a condominium management association or a residential real estate management association is confined to the developers and the owners of the units, residences, or lots. Furthermore, membership in either type of association is normally required as a condition of such ownership. However, if the membership of an organization consists of other homeowners associations, the owners of units, residences, or lots who are members of such other homeowners associations will be treated as the members of the organization for the purposes of the regulations under section 528.
( b ) *Condominium.* The term *condominium* means an interest in real property consisting of an undivided interest in common in a portion of a parcel of real property (which may be a fee simple estate or an estate for years, such as a leasehold or subleasehold) together with a separate interest in space in a building located on such property. An interest in property is not a condominium unless the undivided interest in the common elements are vested in the unit holders. In addition, a condominium must meet the requirements of applicable state or local law relating to condominiums or horizontal property regimes.
( c ) *Residential real estate management association.* Residential real estate management associations are normally composed of owners of single-family residential units located in a subdivision, development, or similar area. However, they may also include as members, owners of multiple-family dwelling units located in such areas. They are commonly formed to administer and enforce covenants relating to the architecture and appearance of the real estate development as well as to perform certain maintenance duties relating to common areas.
( d ) *Tenants.* Tenants will not be considered members for purposes of meeting the source of income test under section 528(c)(1)(B) and § 1.528-5. However, the fact that tenants of members of a homeowners association are permitted to be members of the association will not disqualify an association under section 528(c)(1) if it otherwise meets the requirements of section 528(c) and these regulations.
[T.D. 7692, 45 FR 26321, Apr. 18, 1980]
# C_2014282EN.01001901.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional (Spain) lodged on 2 June 2014 — Federación de Servicios Privados del sindicato Comisiones Obreras (CC.OO.) v Tyco Integrated Security, S.L. and Tyco Integrated Fire & Security Corporation Servicios, S.A.

(Case C-266/14)

2014/C 282/25

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Nacional — Sala de lo Social

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Federación de Servicios Privados del sindicato Comisiones Obreras (CC.OO.)

Applicant:

Defendant: Tyco Integrated Security, S.L. and Tyco Integrated Fire & Security Corporation Servicios, S.A.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 2 of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the time spent travelling at the beginning and end of the day by a worker who is not assigned to a fixed place of work but is required to travel every day from home to the premises of a different customer of the employer and to return home from the premises of another, different, customer (following a route or list that is determined for the worker by the employer the previous day), at all times within a geographical area that is more or less extensive, in the conditions of the main proceedings as described in the background to this question, constitutes ‘working time’ as that concept is defined in Article 2 of the directive or, conversely, must it be regarded as a ‘rest period’?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time

1

(OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9)

---
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

RECEIVED 

APR 0 4 2016 

R.L.S. Rental Company, 

Inc,. dlb/a Mizzou Aviation PART 16 DOCKETS 

Complainant, FAA Docket No. 16-13-06 

v. 

City of Joplin, Missouri 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules ofPractice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by 

which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to 

May 28,2016. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 4, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first 

class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Shelley A. Ewalt 

McBreen & Kopko 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, NY 11753 

Respondent: 

Mr. Peter Edwards 

602 South Main Street 

Joplin, MO 64801 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-61 0 

FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0-1 00 

' !J I /1 ' d)Ait/i. L4 

{',I® 

Claudia Roberts 

~ 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis