alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

Calendar No. 688

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 258

To refer S. 974 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Richard Kanehl of Mobile,

Alabama.’’ to the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal

Claims for a report thereon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 19 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. HEFLIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 974 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Richard

Kanehl of Mobile, Alabama.’’ to the chief judge of the

United States Court of Federal Claims for a report

thereon.

1 Resolved, That, as a supplement to S. Res. 108 of

2 the 103d Congress, the bill S. 974 entitled ‘‘A bill for the

3 relief of Richard Kanehl of Mobile, Alabama.’’ now pend4 ing in the Senate, together with all the accompanying pa5 pers, is referred to the chief judge of the United States
2

•SRES 258 RS

1 Court of Federal Claims. The chief judge shall proceed

2 with the same in accordance with the provisions of sections

3 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code, notwith4 standing the bar of any statute of limitations, laches, res

5 judicata, collateral estoppel, or bar of sovereign immunity,

6 and report thereon to the Senate, at the earliest prac7 ticable date, giving such findings of fact and conclusions

8 thereon as shall be sufficient to inform the Congress of

9 the nature and character of the demand as a claim, legal

10 or equitable, against the United States or a gratuity and

11 the amount, if any, legally or equitably due to the claim12 ants from the United States. In complying with this reso13 lution, the Court of Federal Claims is requested to con14 sider the records of any previous trial of the issues in this

15 case, including the records of Merchants National Bank

16 v. United States (7 Cl. Ct. 1; 1984).

Calendar No. 688

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 258

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 974 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of

Claims for a report thereon.chief judge of the United States Court of FederalRichard Kanehl of Mobile, Alabama.’’ to the

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT 32.2

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Giant Industries, Inc.
("Giant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark B. Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Giant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Giant.


                                       By: /s/ MARK B. COX
                                         -------------------------------
                                       Name:   Mark B. Cox
                                       Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 8, 2005
#### Ellyn Duncan et al. *v.*Laurence McTiernan

King, C. J., Muephy, Alcoen, Comxey and House, Js.

Argued March 3

decided March 12, 1964

*William F. Gallagher,*with whom, on the brief, were *Morton E. Cole*and *Cyril Cole,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

*Robert F. Taylor,*with whom, on the brief, were *J. Ronald Regnier, William R. Moller*and *Edmund T. Curran,*for the appellee (defendant).

House, J.

The plaintiffs brought this aetion to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by the defendant’s negligent operation of his automobile. In the course of the trial, the plaintiffs called as a witness an insurance investigator whom they had subpoenaed together with his files. The files contained two documents signed by the defendant. The plaintiffs offered both documents as exhibits, claiming that they contained admissions and state*470ments inconsistent with the testimony previously given by the defendant. After examination of the papers, the court refused to admit them as exhibits. The plaintiffs thereupon requested that both documents be marked as exhibits for identification. The court denied this request. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiffs have appealed, assigning as error the court’s refusal to admit the documents as full exhibits as well as its refusal to allow them to be marked as exhibits for identification.

It was manifest error for the court to refuse to permit the documents to be marked as exhibits for identification. The court had no discretion to refuse such a request, because to allow such discretion would permit a trial judge to deprive an aggrieved party of a proper record for an appeal. That is the situation in the present instance. The proffered documents, not having been marked for identification, are not a part of the record on this appeal and therefore are not available for examination by this court to determine whether the trial court made a proper ruling in excluding them as full exhibits. *Sickmund*v. *Connecticut Co.,*122 Conn. 375, 382, 189 A. 876; *Davis*v. *Greenstein,*112 Conn. 530, 535, 153 A. 161; *Roberti*v. *Barbieri,*105 Conn. 539, 543, 136 A. 85; see also *Weller*v. *Fish Transport Co.,*123 Conn. 49, 60, 192 A. 317; *Smirnoff*v. *McNerney,*112 Conn. 421, 422, 152 A. 399; *Thelin*v. *Downs,*109 Conn. 662, 668, 145 A. 50. Under the circumstances, this court has no alternative but to order a new trial.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and a new trial is ordered.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.
#### § 1.6011-7 Specified tax return preparers required to file individual income tax returns using magnetic media.

Individual income tax returns that are required to be filed on magnetic media by tax return preparers under section 6011(e)(3) and § 301.6011-7 of this chapter must be filed in accordance with Internal Revenue Service regulations, revenue procedures, revenue rulings, publications, forms or instructions, including those posted electronically.

[T.D. 9518, 76 FR 17528, Mar. 30, 2011]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50556

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SALVADOR AGUILAR-MUNIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CR-341

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1997

Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Salvador Aguilar-Muniz appeals from his sentence for illegal

reentry into the United States after his deportation in violation

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. His motion for a stay of his appeal pending

the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. AlmendarezTorres, 113 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. granted, 117 S. Ct.

1333 (1997), is DENIED. 

Aguilar-Muniz argues that he was charged with and pleaded

guilty to illegal reentry under § 1326(a) and that he could not
No. 97-50556

-2-

be sentenced under § 1326(b)(2) because the indictment failed to

allege that he had a prior aggravated felony conviction. His

argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States

v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
#### § 1.411(d)-1 Coordination of vesting and discrimination requirements. [Reserved]
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Ground-water hydrology and geology of the lower Great Miami 
River valley, Ohio

#### Professional Paper 605-A

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Preceding Publications:
- Hydrogeologic 
    aspects of an analog model study of the Fairfield-New Baltimore area, Ohio 
    (1965)
- Bedrock 
    contour maps of the Lower Great Miami River valley, Ohio (1967)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp605A 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:54
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFunding and Strategic Alignment Guidance for Infusing Small Business Innovation Research Technology Into Science Mission Directorate Projects at Glenn Research Center for 2015This report is intended to help NASA program and project managers incorporate Glenn ResearchCenter Small Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR)/(STTR)technologies into NASA Science Mission Directorate (SMD) programs/projects. Other Government and commercial project managers can also find this useful.Document ID20160013708Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNguyen, Hung D.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Steele, Gynelle C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 22, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2016Subject CategoryAdministration And ManagementReport/Patent NumberE-19280GRC-E-DAA-TN28664NASA/TM-2016-219161Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 471296.01.03.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsSpacecraft and Platform SubsystemsDetectors and InstrumentsRobotic Exploration Technologies.SensorsAvailable DownloadsNameType20160013708.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Household Finance Corporation *v.*Thomas Hill

*James M. 8. TJllman,*in support of the petition.

*Manuel B. Clark,*in opposition.

Submitted August 16

decided September 18, 1963

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Leonard Osser, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Milestone Scientific Inc.(“the Registrant”).2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: August 14, 2007                                                   /s/ Leonard Osser   Leonard Osser   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   
21
§ 1.532-1 Corporations subject to accumulated earnings tax. ( a ) *General rule.* ( 1 ) The tax imposed by section 531 applies to any domestic or foreign corporation (not specifically excepted under section 532(b) and paragraph (b) of this section) formed or availed of to avoid or prevent the imposition of the individual income tax on its shareholders, or on the shareholders of any other corporation, by permitting earnings and profits to accumulate instead of dividing or distributing them. See section 533 and § 1.533-1, relating to evidence of purpose to avoid income tax with respect to shareholders.
( 2 ) The tax imposed by section 531 may apply if the avoidance is accomplished through the formation or use of one corporation or a chain of corporations. For example, if the capital stock of the M Corporation is held by the N Corporation, the earnings and profits of the M Corporation would not be returned as income subject to the individual income tax until such earnings and profits of the M Corporation were distributed to the N Corporation and distributed in turn by the N Corporation to its shareholders. If either the M Corporation or the N Corporation was formed or is availed of for the purpose of avoiding or preventing the imposition of the individual income tax upon the shareholders of the N Corporation, the accumulated taxable income of the corporation so formed or availed of (M or N, as the case may be) is subject to the tax imposed by section 531.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531 does not apply to a personal holding company (as defined in section 542), to a foreign personal holding company (as defined in section 552), or to a corporation exempt from tax under subchapter F, chapter 1 of the Code.
( c ) *Foreign corporations.* Section 531 is applicable to any foreign corporation, whether resident or nonresident, with respect to any income derived from sources, within the United States, if any of its shareholders are subject to income tax on the distributions of the corporation by reason of being ( 1 ) citizens or residents of the United States, or
( 2 ) nonresident alien individuals to whom section 871 is applicable, or
( 3 ) foreign corporations if a beneficial interest therein is owned directly or indirectly by any shareholder specified in subparagraph (1) or (2) of this paragraph.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 156 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 156

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to future extensions of 
            the emergency unemployment compensation program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 27 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

Mr. Nickles (for himself, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Packwood) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to future extensions of 
            the emergency unemployment compensation program.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) based on current economic forecasts, the Senate does 
        not anticipate the need for the enactment of a further 
        extension of the emergency unemployment compensation program, 
        and
            (2) at the earliest possible date, the Administration 
        should propose, and the Congress should enact, legislation to 
        reform the current unemployment insurance system.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Principal Plus Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,969,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,126,745<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,126,745<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               445,330<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               753,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (320,010)<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (320,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (320,010)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
loss on open contracts of $250,531, net option premiums of $369,600 and
Investment in U.S. Treasury Securities of $45,006,339.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $1,977,795, accrued brokerage
fee of $184,716, accrued administrative fees of $202,077, accrued
management fees of $46,179, and accrued transaction fees and costs of
$3,030.
<F3>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $1,583,071, net
change in unrealized of $(447,915), interest income of $751,442 and
change in valuation of Yield Pool of $(1,441,268).
<F4>Income-Pretax, Income Continuing and Net Income includes minority
interest in loss of $11,967.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 1.679-7 Effective dates. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the rules of §§ 1.679-1, 1.679-2, 1.679-3, and 1.679-4 apply with respect to transfers after August 7, 2000.
( b ) *Special rules.* ( 1 ) The rules of § 1.679-4(c) and (d) apply to an obligation issued after February 6, 1995, whether or not in accordance with a pre-existing arrangement or understanding. For purposes of the rules of § 1.679-4(c) and (d), if an obligation issued on or before February 6, 1995, is modified after that date, and the modification is a significant modification within the meaning of § 1.1001-3, the obligation is treated as if it were issued on the date of the modification. However, the penalty provided in section 6677 applies only to a failure to report transfers in exchange for obligations issued after August 20, 1996.
( 2 ) The rules of § 1.679-5 apply to persons whose residency starting date is after August 7, 2000.
( 3 ) The rules of § 1.679-6 apply to trusts that become foreign trusts after August 7, 2000.
[T.D. 8955, 66 FR 37889, July 20, 2001]