Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-8595-9]

Availability of EPA comments prepared  pursuant to the Environmental Review  Process (ERP), under section 309 of the  Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of  the National Environmental Policy Act  as amended. Requests for copies of EPA  comments can be directed to the Office of  Federal Activities at 202-564-7146.

An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements  (EISs) was published in FR dated July 17, 2009 (74 FR 34754).

## Draft EISs

*EIS No. 20080242,*                     ERP No. D-BLM-D65040-WV, East  Lynn Lake Coal Lease Project, Proposal to Lease  Federal Coal That Lies Under Nine Tracts of Land  for Mining, Wayne County, WV.                

Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections about  adverse impacts to water quality and aquatic  life. EPA recommends the development of an  alternative that incorporates a larger, more  conservative and protective buffer between  potential mining operations and the existing  earthen dam. EPA requested additional  information on past and current water quality and  quality impairments. Rating EO2.

*EIS No. 20080385,*                     ERP No. D-FTA-D54042-MD, Red  Line Corridor Transit Study, Alternatives  Analysis, Implementation of a New East-West  Transit Alignment through Baltimore, Baltimore  County, MD.                

Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.

*EIS No. 20080422,*                     ERP No. D-FTA-D54043-MD, Purple  Line Transit Project, Proposed 16-Mile Rapid  Transit Line Extending from Bethesda in  Montgomery County to New Carrollton in Prince  George's County, MD.                

Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.

*EIS No. 20090154,*                     ERP No. D-NPS-E65083-AL, Tuskegee Airmen National Historic Site, General  Management Plan, Implementation, Tuskegee, AL.                

Summary: While EPA has no objections to the proposed  action, it suggested the use of Best Management  Practices. Rating LO.

## Final EISs

*EIS No. 20090158,*                     ERP No. F-FHW-F40435-IL, Illinois Route 29 (FAP 318) Corridor Study, Transportation Improvement from Illinois 6 to  Interstate 180, Funding and US Army COE Section  404 Permit, Peoria, Marshall, Putnam and Bureau  Counties, IL.                

Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns  about wetland and habitat impacts, and requested  that the Record of Decision include more  information on mitigation measures to reduce  erosion and wildlife crossings.

*EIS No. 20090193,*                     ERP No. F-AFS-F65072-WI, Camp  Four Vegetation Project, Proposes Vegetation and  Road Management Activities, Desired Future  Condition (DFC), Medford-Park Falls Ranger  District, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Price County, WI.                

Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action.

*EIS No. 20090194,*                     ERP No. F-AFS-K65342-CA, Moonlight and Wheeler Fires Recovery and  Restoration Project, Analysis of the No-Action  and Action Alternatives, Mt. Hough Ranger  District, Plumas National Forest, Plumas County, CA.                

Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns  about adverse impacts to watersheds, and  recommended that the action avoid California  spotted owl home range core areas and protected  activity centers, minimize new road construction, and use all practical methods to minimize  emissions during construction.

*EIS No. 20090195,*                     ERP No. F-COE-G39051-LA, Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet (MRGO), Louisiana, and Lake Borgne Wetland Creation and Shoreline  Protection Project, Proposes to Construct  Shoreline Protection Features Along the Lake  Borgne Shoreline to Restore and Nourish Wetlands, Lake Borgne, LA.                

Summary: EPA's previous comments were adequately  addressed; therefore, EPA does not object to  the proposed action.

Dated: July 28, 2009.

Robert W. Hargrove,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. E9-18349 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P