alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Refinery and Blender Net ProductionRelease date 4/29/13

Back to Contents

### Data 1: U.S. Refinery and Blender Net Production

SourcekeyM_EPM0CAL55_YPR_N US_MBBLM_EPM0CAG55_YPR_N US_MBBL

DateU.S. Refinery and

Blender Production of Motor Gasoline, Finished, Conventional, Ed55 and Lower (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Refinery and Blender Production of Motor Gasoline, Finished, Conventional, Greater Than Ed55 (Thousand Barrels)Annual equivalent (mill gal) Jan-2010 127486 17 Feb-2010 122014 18 Mar-2010 139901 51 Apr-2010140817 63 May-2010149499 51 Jun-2010 148097 59 Jul-2010 157073 58 Aug-2010 155206 62 Sep-2010 147735 59 Oct-2010 154981 79 Nov-2010 148306 43 Dec-2010 155545 50 Jan-2011 144116 52 26 Feb-2011 136972 57 29 Mar-2011 155367 80 40 Apr-2011 152552 78 39 May-2011 156507 99 50 Jun-2011 157341 96 48 Jul-2011 161749 84 42 Aug-2011 164088 81 41 Sep-2011 155600 81 41 Oct-2011 159866 72 36 Nov-2011 154806 65 33 Dec-2011 160427 73 37 Jan-2012 148698 44 22 Feb-2012 148545 69 35 Mar-2012 161625 90 45 Apr-2012 157162 92 46 May-2012 166307 90 45 Jun-2012 164013 86 43 Jul-2012 166569 77 39 Aug-2012 168978 80 40 Sep-2012 154528 77 39 Oct-2012 165394 72 36 Nov-2012 158289 62 31 Dec-2012 159294 52 26 Jan-2013153732 49 25 Feb-2013145505 64 32Total consumption (mill gal) 2010 25.62 2011 38.556 2012 37.422
Exhibit 4.46



PROMISSARY NOTE



|Borrower: | Ehave, Inc. of 277 Lakeshore Road East, Suite 203, Oakville, ON L6J 6J3 (the “Company”)
|--------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|          |                                                                                        
|Lender:   | _____________ of ___________ (the “Lender”)                                            



Principal Amount: _________
USD



| | 1. | FOR VALUE RECEIVED, The Borrower promise to pay the Lender at such address as may be provided in writing to the Borrower, the
principal sum of ________ USD, with 25% interest payable ($_______). This note shall rank senior to all other debt of the Company.
This Note is due on December 31, 2018.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Any time while not in default under this Note, the Borrower may repay the outstanding balance then owing under this Note to
the Lender without further bonus or penalty.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | This Note will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 4. | This Note will endure to the benefit of and be binding upon the representative heirs, executors, administrators, successors
and assigns of the Borrower and the Lender.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly affixed their signatures
under seal on this 31 day of October, 2018.



|SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED | Ehave, Inc.               
|---------------------------- | --------------------------
|                             |                           
|October  31, 2018            |                           
|                             |                           
|                             | Per ______________________
|                             |                           
|SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED | _________________         
|                             |                           
|October 31, 2018             |                           
|                             |                           
|                             | Per ______________________
exv10w60



 





Exhibit 10.60




January 5, 2007




PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL




Mr. Hari Nair

871 Fox Trail Court

Lake Forest, IL 60045




Dear Mr. Nair:




          On behalf of Tenneco Inc. (the “Company”), I am pleased to set forth and confirm the terms and
conditions of your continued service as Executive Vice President and Managing Director-Europe,
South America and India of the Company. This letter agreement amends your employment letter
agreement with the Company dated June 1, 2001 (the “Original Agreement”).



1. Base Salary. Your minimum base salary of $305,000 per year as set forth in Paragraph 2
of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to be $414,000 per year, which will be subject to such
increases as may from time to time be approved by the Board or such committee of the Board to which
such power has been delegated (the “Committee”), payable according to the regular pay
schedule for salaried employees.



2. Annual Bonus. Your minimum annual target bonus of $273,000 as set forth in Paragraph 3
of the Original Agreement is hereby amended such that, commencing with calendar year 2006, your
annual target bonus will be, at least, $273,000 subject to fulfillment of performance goals or
other criteria as determined by the Board or Committee.



3. Amendment to SERP. Effective as of August 31, 2006, you hereby consent and agree to the
following changes the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and its successor, the
Company’s Supplemental Retirement Plan (collectively, the “SERP”). The Company amend the
Supplemental Retirement Plan to (i) reduce to 1.402% the annual rate (expressed as a percentage of
final average compensation as defined in that plan) at which you will accrue benefits under such
plan for each year of service earned after December 31, 2006, and (ii) provide as an offset to
benefits under such plan the actuarial equivalent value (determined in accordance with the
assumptions used for such purpose under such plan) of any amounts paid to you in respect of “DB
Replacement Contributions” as described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August
23, 2006.



4. Governing Law; No Other Amendments. This letter agreement shall be governed by, and
shall be construed in accordance with, the internal laws (and not the laws of conflicts) of the
State of Illinois. Except as expressly set forth herein, the Original Agreement shall not be
amended or modified hereby. The Original Agreement shall, as expressly amended hereby, remain in
full force and effect.




 









 





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Sincerely,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	TENNECO INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	/s/
Richard P. Schneider 	 	 
	 

	 	Its:	 	SVP – Global Administration 	 	 






ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/
Hari Nair 

	 	Date:	 	 	 	 
	 

Hari Nair
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby
certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
“Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and
“Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of October 22, 2015 among
the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2015-4 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2017, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
this 22nd day of May, 2017.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kand all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period coveredby this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2015-CCRE27 Mortgage Trust (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Actperiodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicercompliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all materialrespects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliatedparties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCBank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC,as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee andCertificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, KeyBankNational Association, as Primary Servicer, Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark Knight Frank, as Primary Servicer, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator, Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as ServicingFunction Participant for the Custodian, KeyBankNational Association, as Primary Servicer for the 11 Madison Avenue MortgageLoan, KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer for the 11 MadisonAvenue Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee forthe 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, and ComputershareTrust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCustodian for the 11 Madison Avenue MortgageLoan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 14, 2023

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

Helaine M. Kaplan

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)
The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3748

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Richard Charles Berry, * * [PUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 6, 1998 Filed: March 11, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
RichardCharles Berry appeals the 37-month sentence imposed by the District Court af ter he pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 44 kilograms o f 1 marijuana, in violati on of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (1994). For reversal, Berry argues that the District Court erred in e nhancing his base offense level for possessing firearms during a drug offense bec ause the firearms were found in a bedroom of his residence and the-2-

mari juana was found in his truck parked outside of the residence. We disagree, an d affirm.
A se ntencing court must add two levels to a defendant & s base offense level if a dange rous weapon, including a firearm, was possessed during a drug offense; th e enhancement is appropria

te where a firearm is present “unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.” U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) & cmt. 3 (1997). Berry admitted that he possessed two firearms; that the twofirearms were loaded; that cash and scales used for weighing marijuana were found in the bedroom with the firearms; and that he placed the 44 kilograms o f mariju ana

in his truck and parked the vehicle at his home, intending to deliver th e marijuana at a later date. Based on t hose facts, we conclude the District Court did not clearly err in assessing the enha ncement. See United States v. Vaughn , 111 F.3d 610, 61 6 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review); United States v. Betz , 82 F.3d 205, 210-11 (8th Cir. 1996) (holding that application of § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement was not clear error where firearms and drugs were found in different places on defendant & s property); United States v. Hiveley , 61 F.3d 1358 , 1362-63 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (holding that app lication of § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement was not clearly erroneous wher e firea rms were found in one trailer on defendant & s property and drugs were found i n different trailer, despite defendant & s argument that there was no evidence he had ever used firearms during drug transaction). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. KEVIN LLOYD STANLEY, AKA Kevin Stanley, Defendant - Appellant. No. 10-50206 D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00486-ODW-1 Central District of California, Los Angeles
ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING Before: TROTT, BYBEE, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. The Memorandum Disposition filed on August 16, 2012 is AMENDED as follows: On page 4 of the Memorandum Disposition, the following sentence is deleted: “Rather, the evidence shows th at Solorio accessed the computer’s hard drive remotely, which would have bypa ssed any screen displaying the user accounts.” With this amendment, appellant’s petition for rehearing, filed August 17, 2012, is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing may be filed. 

# FILED
AUG 24 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Osser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


                                /s/ Leonard Osser
                                ----------------------
                                Leonard Osser
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                August 5, 2004


                                       23
**Exhibit 10(e)(11)**

 

**ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO**

**KAISER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

**401(k) PLAN**

 

WHEREAS,Kaiser Group International, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Kaiser GroupInternational, Inc. Section 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS,Section 10.2 authorizes the Board to amend the Plan;

 

NOW,THEREFORE, effective May 31, 2004, the Plan is amended as follows:

 

Exhibit A isamended to include a reference to Kaiser Analytical Management Services, Inc.as an “Excluded Entity”.

 

Executed this 11th day of November, 2004.

 

 
|   | KAISER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |                             |
|   |                             |
|   | By:                              | /s/ Douglas W. McMinn |   |
|   |                             | Douglas W. McMinn, |
|   |                             | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[115th Congress Public Law 42]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 883]]

Public Law 115-42
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend section 1214 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for 
 stays during a period that the Merit Systems Protection Board lacks a 
              quorum. <<NOTE: June 27, 2017 -  [S. 1083]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAYS BY MSPB DURING PERIODS WITH NO QUORUM.

    Section 1214(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(i)'' before ``The Board may''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(ii) If the Board lacks the number of members appointed under 
section 1201 required to constitute a quorum, any remaining member of 
the Board who was appointed, by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate, may, upon request by the Special Counsel, extend the period of 
any stay granted under subparagraph (A).''.

    Approved June 27, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1083:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            May 11, considered and passed Senate.
            May 25, considered and passed House, amended.
            June 14, Senate concurred in House amendment.

                                  <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2238

___________ Anthony Q. Harris, * * Appellant, * *
v. * * City of Pagedale, a Municipal * Corporation; Darlene Crawley, * individually, and in her representative * capacity as Mayor and Chairperson of * the Board of Alderpersons of the City of * Pagedale; Pauline Catmet, individually, * and in her representative capacity as * Assistant Mayor and Alderperson of the * Appeal from the United States Board of Alderpersons of the City of * District Court for the Pagedale; Ronald McGee, individually, * Eastern District of Missouri. and in his representative capacity as * Alderperson of the City of Pagedale; * [UNPUBLISHED] Mary Carter, individually, and in her * representative capacity as Alderperson * of the City of Pagedale; John Wolf, * individually, and in his representative * capacity as Alderperson of the City of * Pagedale; Mary Evans, individually, and * in her representative capacity as * Alderperson of the City of Pagedale; * Rapheal Morris, individually, and in his * representative capacity as Alderperson * of the City of Pagedale; Jerry Simpson, * individually, and in his representative * capacity as City Clerk and member of *The Honorable David D. Noce, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern 1 Dis trict of Missouri, who presided over the case with the consent of the parties i n accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2- the Police Board of the City of Pagedale; * Thomas M. Pierce, individually, and in * his representative capacity as Acting * Chief of the City of Pagedale, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 18, 1997 Filed: May 9, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Anthony Q. Harris appeals from an order of the District Court granting th e 1 motions of the defendants for summar y judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude th at on the undisputed facts the District Court correctly held that (1) Harris, who was an at-will employee, had no property interest in continued employment with the City of Pagedale, and therefore had no constitutional right to a pre-terminatio n hearing, and (2 ) Harris waived any right he may have had to a name-clearing hearing. Bec ausethe case does not warrant extended discussion, the judgment of the Distric t Court is affirmed on the basis o f that court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-3-

A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT