alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CO NSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

SMALL ELECTRIC MOTORS

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20585 Thursday, December 17, 2009 9 a.m. – 5 p.m. ET, Room 8E-089

Purpose The Department of Energy (DOE) will r eceive comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) and the energy efficiency standards proposed in the notice. DOE will present the methodology used for the NOPR analysis and example results. In addition, DOE will present its plans for the re maining analysis—the analysis to support the Final Rule—and will seek input from interested parties on the methodologies, assumptions, data sources, and analysis results.

Agenda

9:00-9:05 am Welcome

9:05-9:15 am Opening Remarks, In troductions, and Agenda Review Doug Brookman

9:15-9:30 am Rulemaking Overview

Jim Raba Overview of the analyses in the rulemaking, the tools DOE uses to generate results for each analysis, and the issues on which DOE would like input during today’s meeting.

9:30-10:00 am Comments from Participants Doug Brookman Open forum for participants to make a brief summary statement and/or identify thei r key issues regarding the NOPR analyses, methods, data, and results.

10:00-11:00 am Scope of Coverage, Product Classes, and Engineering Analysis

Matt Nardotti Summary presentation and di scussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the market and technology assessment, the engineering analysis, and a

characterization of the results.

11:00-11:15 am Break11:15 am-12:00 pm Energy Use Analys is, Markups for Equipment Price Determination, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, Consumer Subgroup Analysis Asa Hopkins Summary presentation and di scussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the energy use analysis, markups to determin e equipment prices, life-cycle cost and payback period an alyses, consumer subgroup analysis, and a characterization of the results.

12:00-1:00 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

1:00-1:45 pm Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis Asa Hopkins Summary presentation and di scussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the shipments analysis, national energy savi ngs, net present value, and a

characterization of the results.

1:45-2:30 pm Trial Standard Levels and Manufacturer Impact Analysis Matt Nardotti and Doug Rossin Summary presentation and di scussion regarding trial standard levels and the approach used and factors considered for the manufacturer impact analysis.

2:30-3:00 pm Utility Impact Anal ysis, Employment Impact Analysis, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis Asa Hopkins Summary presentation and di scussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the utility, employment, environmental, and regulatory analyses.

3:00-3:30 pm Break

3:30-4:00 pm Discussion of Other Issues Doug Brookman Open forum to discuss any re maining questions or issues identified by participants.

4:00-4:45 pm Next Step s and Closing Remarks

Jim Raba Participants will discuss outstanding issues and concluding

remarks.

4:45 pm Adjourn
Presidential Documents

37159 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 143 

Tuesday, July 28, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8397 of July 23, 2009 

35th Anniversary of the Legal Services Corporation, 2009 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Every day the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) breathes life into the timeless 

ideal, ‘‘equal justice under law.’’ It reaches those who cannot afford the 

assistance they need and those who would otherwise go without vital representation. Today we recognize the 35 years during which the LSC has 

moved our Nation and our legal system towards greater equality. 

The LSC brings legal counsel to every corner of the Nation. As the largest 

provider of civil legal aid to the poor, it supports programs that touch 

families in every State. Persons of all ethnic and racial backgrounds know 

its great work, and women, who represent 75 percent of LSC-supported 

clients, especially benefit from its expertise. 

The Legal Services Corporation’s work helps improve lives. It allows more 

people to access the public benefits they deserve, more domestic violence 

victims to secure the protections they desperately need, and more workers 

to receive the compensation they have been promised and earned. 

During an economic crisis, the work of the LSC is especially important. 

When families face foreclosure, eviction, or bankruptcy, or when communities are targeted by predatory lenders, they need the help of legal professionals. These scenarios are far too common today. Fortunately, the LSC 

stands ready to meet these demands. 

Because economically vulnerable communities continue to face an unmet 

need for legal services, my Administration has supported increased funding 

for the LSC. I have also recommended lifting several unnecessary restrictions 

on funding so that more people can receive assistance. These changes are 

critical to the organization’s mission and work. 

We have made great progress in protecting the legal rights of our citizens, 

and the Legal Services Corporation has played a vital role in this story 

for more than 3 decades. With continued support, it will serve those in 

need and help our Nation live out its highest ideals. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim July 25, 2009, as 

the 35th Anniversary of the Legal Services Corporation. I call upon legal 

professionals and the people of the United States to honor the contributions 

of this vital organization. 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with RULES2
37160 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 28, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-third 

day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth. 

[FR Doc. E9–18085 

Filed 7–27–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with RULES2OB#1.EPS</GPH>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25709-25710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10394]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOD-2010-HA-0131]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by May 31, 
2012.
    Title, Associated Form and OMB Number: Statement of Personal 
Injury--Possible Third Party Liability, TRICARE Management Activity; DD 
Form 2527; OMB Control Number 0720-0003.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 224,399.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 224,399.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 56,100 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The information is provided by TRICARE (formerly 
CHAMPUS) beneficiaries suffering from personal injuries and receiving 
medical care at Government expense. The information is necessary in the 
assertion of the Government's right to recovery under the Federal 
Medical Care Recovery Act. The data is used in the evaluation and 
processing of these claims.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; Federal government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket

[[Page 25710]]

number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy 
for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to 
make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at 
http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: February 15, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-10394 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 261

Commending Ambassador Mou-shih Ding, Representative of the Taipei

Economic and Cultural Representative Office in Washington, D.C.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself, Mr. ROBB, Mr. SIMON, and Mr. HELMS)

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending Ambassador Mou-shih Ding, Representative of

the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office

in Washington, D.C.

Whereas Ambassador Mou-shih Ding has served since 1988

as Representative of the Taipei Economic and Cultural

Representative Office (TECRO) (formerly the Coordination Council for North American Affairs (CCNAA)) in

Washington, D.C., representing the interests of the Republic of China on Taiwan;

Whereas during his tenure, Ambassador Ding has made a

major contribution to strengthening the friendship of and

fostering beneficial cooperation between the people of the

Republic of China and the people of the United States,

including his successful efforts to change the name of the

office from Coordination Council for North American Af-
2

SRES 261 ATS

fairs to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative

Office;

Whereas during his years in Washington, Ambassador Ding

has made countless friends in the United States Congress

and successive Administrations; and

Whereas this month Ambassador Ding is departing his post

in Washington to return to accept his prestigious appointment as the Secretary General of the National Security Council: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the United States Congress—

2 (1) salutes Ambassador Mou-shih Ding for his

3 creative leadership of the TECRO (CCNAA) in

4 Washington;

5 (2) commends his tireless efforts to further the

6 interests of the Republic of China by building closer

7 ties to the United States;

8 (3) thanks him for the friendship he has shown

9 to so many members of the Senate; and

10 (4) expresses to him and to his family the

11 warmest wishes for the future.

Æ
#### § 1.471-10 Applicability of long-term contract methods.

See § 1.460-2 for rules providing for the application of the long-term contract methods to certain manufacturing contracts.

[T.D. 8067, 51 FR 393, Jan. 6, 1986, as amended by T.D. 8929, 66 FR 2240, Jan. 11, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6150 Ultrasonic cleaner for medical instruments. ( a ) *Identification.* An ultrasonic cleaner for medical instruments is a device intended for cleaning medical instruments by the emission of high frequency soundwaves.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I. The device, including any solutions intended for use with the device for cleaning and sanitizing the instruments, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
[45 FR 69682, Oct. 21, 1980, as amended at 54 FR 25050, June 12, 1989; 59 FR 63011, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38805, July 25, 2001]
# Administrative Decisions

The applicable Rules of Practice before the Judicial Officer and the Office of Administrative Law Judges are available at Rules of Practice.

*New decisions typically are added to this website on a monthly basis.*

The Administrative Decisions of the Judicial Officer Department from 1957 through the present are accessible using the filter list below.

## Search tip

To find a decision by topic, enter your topic in the search bar in the header. When you receive your results, select the Advanced Search tab. From here, be sure to select About USPS.com from the Search Specific Site list and select Administrative Decisions from the Search within Section list. You can also apply a date range to help narrow your search.
#### § 1.733-1 Basis of distributee partner's interest.

In the case of a distribution by a partnership to a partner other than in liquidation of a partner's entire interest, the adjusted basis to such partner of his interest in the partnership shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the amount of any money distributed to such partner and by the amount of the basis to him of distributed property other than money as determined under section 732 and §§ 1.732-1 and 1.732-2.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e D a ni e l L . H ovl a nd, U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge f or ** the D i s tr i c tof

N orth D a kot a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** * w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. FR AN CI SC O SOLAN O- GO DI NEZ, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 10084 D. C . No . 4 : 1 1 - c r - 0 3 6 9 6 - C KJ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a ni e l L . H ovl a nd, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry15, 2013 *** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , B E A , an dN G U Y E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F r a nc i s c o S ol a no- G odi ne z appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd chal l enges hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on and 6 3-m on th sent ence for r ee ntryaf t er 

# FI LED JAN 16 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10084 2 de port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), S ol ano-G od i nez’ s c ou nselhas f i l ed a bri ef

st at i ng thatthere ar e n o g r o u n d s f

o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w ith d r a w a s c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d . W e h a v e p r o v id e dS o lan o - G o d in e z th e o p p o rtu n ityto f ile ap r o s e s up p le m e n ta l b r ie f . N o p r o s e s up p le m e n ta l b r ie f o ra n s w e r in g b r ie f

h a s b e e n f

ile d . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. AF F I RME D.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KHALIYFA NEELY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 69 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of September, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# C_2022257EN.01003001.xml

| 4.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2022 — Larko v Commission

(Case T-423/14 RENV) (1)

(State aid - Aid implemented by Greece - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - Advantage - Private investor test - Guarantee premium - Undertaking in difficulty - Awareness of the Greek authorities - Commission Notice on State aid in the form of guarantees - Manifest error of assessment)

(2022/C 257/38)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Larko Geniki Metalleftiki kai Metallourgiki AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: I. Drillerakis, E. Rantos and N. Korogiannakis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Commission Decision 2014/539/EU of 27 March 2014 on State aid SA.34572 (20113/C) (ex 13/NN) implemented by Greece for Larco General Mining & Metallurgical Company S.A. (OJ 2014 L 254, p. 24).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Larko Geniki Metalleftiki kai Metallourgiki AE to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in Cases T-423/14 and T-423/14 RENV, and in Case C-244/18 P. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Larko Geniki Metalleftiki kai Metallourgiki AE to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in Cases T-423/14 and T-423/14 RENV, and in Case C-244/18 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014.

---
#### § 1.544-4 Options.

The shares of stock which may be acquired by reason of an option shall be considered to be constructively owned by the individual having the option to acquire such stock. For example: If C, an individual, on March 1, 1955, purchases an option, or otherwise comes into possession of an option, to acquire 100 shares of the capital stock of M Corporation, such 100 shares of stock shall be considered to be constructively owned by C as if C had actually acquired the stock on that date. If C has an option on an option (or one of a series of options) to acquire such stock, he shall also be considered to have constructive ownership of the stock which may be acquired by reason of the option (or the series of options). Under such circumstances, C shall be considered to have acquired constructive ownership of the stock on the date he acquired his option. For the restriction on the applicability of the rule of this section, see paragraph (b) of § 1.544-1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,096,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  351,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,367,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         286,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,434,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                        12,387
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,011,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,434,086
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               413,849
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (685,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (685,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (685,652)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014142EN.01003901.xml

| 12.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/39

---

Action brought on 19 February 2014 — Finland v Commission

(Case T-124/14)

2014/C 142/51

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski and S. Hartikainen)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Commission Implementing Decision C(2013) 8743 final of 12 December 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2013 L 338, p. 81) in so far as a financial correction of EUR 927 827,58 has been applied to the Republic of Finland on the ground that it has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Implementing Decision C(2013) 8743 final of 12 December 2013 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2013 L 338, p. 81) in so far as a financial correction of EUR 927 827,58 has been applied to the Republic of Finland on the ground that it has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Republic of Finland. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Republic of Finland.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, according to which the Commission has incorrectly interpreted and applied Article 55 of Regulation No 1974/2006. (1) The Commission has erroneously considered that the rules laid down in Finland for the grant of aid for the purchase of second-hand machinery and equipment is not compatible with the second subparagraph of Article 55(1) of Regulation No 1974/2006.

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2006 L 368, p. 15).

1

---