alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,708,546
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,783,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,658,827
<PP&E>                                         818,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,720,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,416
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,434
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,503,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,720,497
<SALES>                                        5,084,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,084,665
<CGS>                                          1,341,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,341,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,093,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                649,474
<INCOME-TAX>                                   261,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            388,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   388,474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 146 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 195
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 146

                          [Report No. 104-487]

Authorizing the 1996 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 1996

Mr. Gilchrest submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             March 20, 1996

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the 1996 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF SPECIAL OLYMPICS TORCH RELAY 
              THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    On May 24, 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate may 
jointly designate, the 1996 Special Olympics Torch Relay may be run 
through the Capitol Grounds, as part of the journey of the Special 
Olympics torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer 
games at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out section 1.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event authorized by section 1.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 195

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 146

                          [Report No. 104-487]

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 1996 Special Olympics Torch Relay to be run through the 
                            Capitol Grounds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 20, 1996

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

GEARY WAYNE WALTON, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0594 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

Nos. CR1987-009953, CR1987-010264

The Honorable Justin Beresky, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Daniel Strange

Counsel for Respondent

Geary Wayne Walton, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 5-31-2022
STATE v. WALTON

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge Peter B. Swann and Judge D. 

Steven Williams delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Geary Wayne Walton seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s twenty-fifth successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 96 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 96

 To authorize the President to proclaim the last Friday in April 1993 
                  and 1994, as ``National Arbor Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 1993

 Mr. Bradley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the President to proclaim the last Friday in April 1993 
                  and 1994, as ``National Arbor Day''.

    Resolved, That the President is hereby authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation designating the last Friday of April 1993 and 
1994, as ``National Arbor Day'' and calling upon the people of the 
United States to observe such a day with appropriate ceremonies and 
activities.

                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5375-N-09]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 12, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: March 4, 2010.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2010-5015 Filed 3-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community National
Bancorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Theron G. Reed, principal
executive and financial officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/ Theron G. Reed
------------------------------
Theron G. Reed
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive and financial officer)

August 15, 2005
------------------------------
Date
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 185 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 185

To congratulate Phil Rizutto on his induction into the Baseball Hall of 
                                 Fame.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 8 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

 Mr. D'Amato submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To congratulate Phil Rizutto on his induction into the Baseball Hall of 
                                 Fame.

Whereas Yankee shortstop Phil ``Scooter'' Rizzuto was born on September 25, 
        1917, in Brooklyn, New York;
Whereas the famous Casey Stengel, while manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers, looked 
        at a young Phil Rizzuto and dismissed him saying: ``Get yourself a shoe 
        shine box, kid. You're too small'';
Whereas the ``Scooter'' appeared in 5 All-Star Games, starred on 10 pennant 
        winning teams, and in 9 World Series;
Whereas in the 1947 World Series Phil Rizzuto hit .308 and was a key player in 
        the New York Yankees' memorable 7-game World Series win over the 
        Brooklyn Dodgers;
Whereas in 1949 Phil Rizzuto hit .275 and fielded .971, leading the New York 
        Yankees in games played, hits, runs, doubles, and total bases stolen, 
        resulting in his being named Player of the Year by the baseball writers;
Whereas Phil Rizzuto, as an announcer, has endeared thousands of fans to the 
        great game of baseball; and
Whereas Phil Rizzuto has waited 38 long, hopeful years to be inducted into the 
        Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York, a dream which has 
        finally been realized: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the outstanding contributions of Phil 
        Rizutto to the great game of baseball; and
            (2) congratulates Phil Rizutto on the occasion of his 
        induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame.

SEC. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF COPY OF RESOLUTION.

    The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to Phil Rizutto.

                                 <all>
```
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-0804V 

 Filed: February 2, 2018 

UNPUBLISHED 

JULIA HAYES, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES, 

 Respondent. 

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; 

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA) 

   

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner. 

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On June 15, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that that her influenza (“flu”) vaccination on September 29, 

2016 caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). 

Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of 

Special Masters. 

On February 1, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report 

at 1. Specifically, respondent indicates that 

                                                            

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
DICP has reviewed the petition and medical records filed in this case and 

has concluded that compensation is appropriate in this case. DICP has 

concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA, as 

defined on the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, petitioner’s pain occurred 

within 48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination, pain was limited 

to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered, and no other 

condition or abnormality was identified to explain her shoulder pain. 42 

C.F.R. § 100.3(a),(c)(10). 

Id. at 3. (footnote omitted). 

 In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
exv4w4



 





Exhibit 4.4




Las Vegas Sands Corp.

3355 Las Vegas Boulevard South

Las Vegas, Nevada 89109




	 	 	 
	 

	 	February 28, 2007






Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549




Subject: Annual Report on Form 10-K




In accordance with paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, Las Vegas Sands Corp. (the
“Corporation”) has not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the (“SEC”) copies of
certain instruments with respect to long-term debt of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, the
total amount of debt authorized under each of which does not exceed 10% of the aggregate assets of
the Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Corporation hereby agrees to
furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each instrument which defines the rights of holders of
such long-term debt.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	Very truly yours,
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Robert P. Rozek
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Robert P. Rozek

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854883
<NAME>                        Edd Helms Group, Inc.
<CURRENCY>                    Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         310,657
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,080,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                   51,966
<INVENTORY>                                    554,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,207,183
<PP&E>                                         1,822,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,163,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,122,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,173,478
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       126,740
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,560,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,122,456
<SALES>                                        2,621,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,621,249
<CGS>                                          1,814,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,814,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               622,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,789
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                182,370
<INCOME-TAX>                                   160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            182,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   182,210
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 8, 2016

p0229 

# Order

Clerk March 8, 2016

150802(19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150802

COA: 323758

Oakland CC: 2011

- 238929

- FC

REDWAN HUSSAIN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November

24, 2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does no t appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
39554.

#### ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY et al. v. COOPER.

Decided July 6, 1962

Rehearing denied July 27, 1962.

*439*Woodruff, Latimer, Saveli, Lane <& Williams, John M. Williams,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Henson, Greene >& Greene, James E. Greene,*contra.

Ebhrhardt, Judge.

1. That an order based upon a finding that an employee has experienced a change in condition can not be made retroactive to a time prior to the date when an application for a hearing on that issue was filed with the board is settled by *National Surety Corp. v. Nelson,*99 Ga. App. 95, 98 (107 SE2d 718) and similar cases. And see *Complete Auto Transit v. Davis,*106 Ga. App. 369 (126 SE2d 909).

The issue of whether the application filed by the employer on June 14, 1961, was sufficient in form to obtain a hearing to determine whether there had been a *change in the employee’s condition*under *Code Ann.*§ 114-709 is not now before us and we make no ruling thereon.1 But if it were a sufficient application for such a hearing it is clear that no order based upon a change of condition could be made effective prior to the date of its filing, and a reversal was demanded since here the order, by its terms based upon a change in condition, was made effective as of September, 1960. However the board does have power to make such an order effective from the date of the filing of the application, and the superior court was in error in limiting the effective date to the date of the hearing.

2. Nor is the issue before us as to whether the employer, or *440the insurance carrier here, is entitled to credit for wages paid during any period after the employee returned to work.

*No*finding on that matter or determination thereof has been made either by the board or raised by way of an affidavit of illegality to any fi. fa. issued from the superior court. See *Complete Auto Transit v. Davis,*106 Ga. App. 369, supra.

*Judgment reversed for reasons stated above.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*

1

See *Anglin v. St. Paul-Mercury Indem. Co.,*106 Ga. App. 395 (126 SE2d 913), where the court dealt with a similar application.