alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 26, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL
PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Troy MillerName:

Troy MillerTitle:

PresidentDate:

March 30, 2017
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM2015-CCRE27 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer, BerkeleyPoint Capital LLC, as Primary Servicer, KeyBank National Association, asPrimary Servicer for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, KeyBank NationalAssociation, as Special Servicer for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee for the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, and Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan.

 

 

Dated: March 18, 2019

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-12-00100-CV

SAMUEL CREGO

v.

GUILLERMO LASH & JOHN HOYSICK

On Appeal from the

404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2010-DCL-3050-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 19, 2013
§ 1.666(b)-1A Total taxes deemed distributed. ( a ) If an accumulation distribution is deemed under § 1.666(a)-1A to be distributed on the last day of a preceding taxable year and the amount is not less than the undistributed net income for such preceding taxable year, then an additional amount equal to the “taxes imposed on the trust attributable to the undistributed net income” (as defined in § 1.665(d)-1A(b)) for such preceding taxable year is also deemed distributed under section 661(a)(2). For example, a trust has undistributed net income of $8,000 for the taxable year 1974. The taxes imposed on the trust attributable to the undistributed net income are $3,032. During the taxable year 1977, an accumulation distribution of $8,000 is made to the beneficiary, which is deemed under § 1.666(a)-1A to have been distributed on the last day of 1974. The 1977 accumulation distribution is not less than the 1974 undistributed net income. Accordingly, the taxes of $3,032 imposed on the trust attributable to the undistributed net income for 1974 are also deemed to have been distributed on the last day of 1974. Thus, a total of $11,032 will be deemed to have been distributed on the last day of 1974.
( b ) For the purpose of paragraph (a) of this section, the undistributed net income of any preceding taxable year and the taxes imposed on the trust for such preceding taxable year attributable to such undistributed net income are computed after taking into account any accumulation distributions of taxable years intervening between such preceding taxable year and the taxable year. See paragraph (d) of § 1.666(a)-1A.
[T.D. 7204, 37 FR 17145, Aug. 25, 1972]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>               THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                       INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q DATED 
                       MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                       ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                       STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER>           1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                        231344
<SECURITIES>                  1152515
<RECEIVABLES>                 75231
<ALLOWANCES>                  5017
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1563050
<PP&E>                        146810
<DEPRECIATION>                100182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2069871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         198176
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      230
<OTHER-SE>                    1680021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2069871
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              99575
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 86188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               13531
<INCOME-TAX>                  4900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           5998
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  5998
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .26
        

</TABLE>
##### 








---



##### 



Three Months Ended
    
    
    Six Months EndedJune 30,
    
    
    June 30,
    
    
    June 30,
    
    
    June 30,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Sales
    
    $
    6,367,397
    
    
    $
    5,072,567
    
    
    $
    12,370,420
    
    
    $
    9,729,427Cost of Goods Sold
    
    
    3,738,617
    
    
    
    2,956,267
    
    
    
    6,951,184
    
    
    
    5,534,223Gross Profit
    
    
    2,628,780
    
    
    
    2,116,300
    
    
    
    5,419,236
    
    
    
    4,195,204Operating Expenses
    
    
    1,698,626
    
    
    
    1,279,043
    
    
    
    3,082,711
    
    
    
    2,434,223Income From
Operations
    
    
    930,154
    
    
    
    837,257
    
    
    
    2,336,525
    
    
    
    1,760,981Total other income
    
    
    286,674
    
    
    
    43,780
    
    
    
    286,313
    
    
    
    303,270Pre-tax income
    
    
    1,216,828
    
    
    
    881,037
    
    
    
    2,622,838
    
    
    
    2,064,251Income taxes
    
    
    466,784
    
    
    
    324,192
    
    
    
    978,136
    
    
    
    782,015Net income
    
    
    750,044
    
    
    
    556,845
    
    
    
    1,644,702
    
    
    
    1,282,236Per Share Earnings
    
    $
    .04
    
    
    $
    .03
    
    
    $
    .10
    
    
    $
    .08Wtg. Ave. Shares
    
    
    16,799,536
    
    
    
    16,795,398
    
    
    
    16,795,473
    
    
    
    16,830,160
   Last Updated: August 14, 2006 09:00 EDT
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3680 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) vitreous carbon materials. ( a ) *Identification.* Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) vitreous carbon material is a device composed of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) vitreous carbon intended for use in maxillofacial alveolar ridge augmentation (building up the upper or lower jaw area that contains the sockets in which teeth are rooted) or intended to coat metal surgical implants to be placed in the alveoli (sockets in which the teeth are rooted) or the temporomandibular joints (the joint between the upper and lower jaws).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987; 52 FR 34456, Sept. 11, 1987]
39280.

#### CURL v. CHERRY, Next Friend.

Decided January 25, 1962.

*R. M. Daley, Jones & Douglas, Paul J. Jones, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thompson*«fe *Briley, Joseph H. Briley, H. Dale Thompson,*contra.

Eberhardt Judge.

In accordance with the well-settled rule that ambiguous pleadings are to be construed most strongly against the pleader and that pleadings are to be construed in the light of their omissions as well as their averments, the failure of the plaintiff to allege facts as to what status he 'occupied on the defendant’s property will be construed as an allegation that the plaintiff was a bare licensee or a trespasser. *Cook v. Southern Ry. Co.,*53 Ga. App. 723 (187 SE 274); *Piggly Wiggly, Macon, Inc. v. Kelsey,*83 Ga. App. 526 (64 SE2d 201); *Ricks v. Boatwright,*95 Ga. App. 267 (97 SE2d 635). The allegations of negligence failing to show a violation of any duty to the plaintiff as a bare licensee or as a trespasser *(Code*§ 105-402; *Mandeville Mills v. Dale,*2 Ga. App. 607, 58 SE 1060), it was error to overrule the defendant’s general demurrer.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Custer, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 133 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 133

   To make appointments to the Committee on the Armed Services, the 
 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on 
   Energy and Natural Resources, and the Special Committee on Aging.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 15 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

 Mr. Ford (for Mr. Mitchell) submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To make appointments to the Committee on the Armed Services, the 
 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on 
   Energy and Natural Resources, and the Special Committee on Aging.

    Resolved, That the Senator from Nevada (Mr. Bryan) is hereby 
appointed to serve as a member on the Committee on Armed Services for 
the One Hundred Third Congress; that the Senator from Tennessee (Mr. 
Mathews) is hereby appointed to serve as a member on the Commerce, 
Science, and Transportation Committee for the One Hundred Third 
Congress; that the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Dorgan) is hereby 
appointed to serve as a member on the Energy and Natural Resources 
Committee for the One Hundred Third Congress; and that the Senator from 
Michigan (Mr. Riegle) is hereby appointed to serve as a member on the 
Special Committee on Aging, for the One Hundred Third Congress.

                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 23

- 00372

- CV

Herminio CHAPA Jr., et al

. , Appellant

v.

MUSEUM REACH LOFTS
, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3
, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CV06009 Honorable Kevin Henderson , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 27, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Appellant’s brief was originally due July 28, 2023 and was not filed. On August 8, 2023,

we ordered appellant to file , by August 23, 2023: (1) his brief; and (2) a written response
reasonably explaining his failure to timely file a brief. In our order, we cautioned the appellant that
if he failed to timely file a brief and written response, we would dismiss the appeal fo r want of

prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a).
Appellant did not respond to our order. Because appellant has failed to timely file a brief,

this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

PER CURIAM
§ 1.6039I-1 Reporting of certain employer-owned life insurance contracts. ( a ) *Requirement to report.* Section 6039I requires every taxpayer that is an applicable policyholder owning one or more employer-owned life insurance contracts issued after August 17, 2006, to file a return showing the following information for each year the contracts are owned— ( 1 ) The number of employees of the applicable policyholder at the end of the year;
( 2 ) The number of such employees insured under such contracts at the end of the year;
( 3 ) The total amount of insurance in force at the end of the year under such contracts;
( 4 ) The name, address, and taxpayer identification number of the applicable policyholder and the type of business in which the policyholder is engaged; and
( 5 ) That the applicable policyholder has a valid consent for each insured employee (or, if all such consents are not obtained, the number of insured employees for whom such consent was not obtained).
( b ) *Time and manner of reporting.* Applicable policyholders owning one or more employer-owned life insurance contracts issued after August 17, 2006, must provide the information required under § 6039I by attaching Form 8925, “Report of Employer-Owned Life Insurance Contracts”, to the policyholder's income tax return by the due date of that return, or by filing such other form at such time and in such manner as the Commissioner may in the future prescribe.
( c ) *Effective/applicability date.* These regulations are applicable for tax years ending after November 6, 2008.
[T.D. 9431, 73 FR 65982, Nov. 6, 2008]
§ 582.1901 Triacetin. ( a ) *Product.* Triacetin (glyceryl triacetate).
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 15 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 15

           To appoint Mr. Conrad to the Committee on Finance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

 Mr. Mitchell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           To appoint Mr. Conrad to the Committee on Finance.

    Resolved, That the Senator from North Dakota (Mr. Conrad) be 
appointed to the Committee on Finance in lieu of his appointment to the 
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 97 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 97

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 1993

       Referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
        To commemorate the sesquicentennial of the Oregon Trail.

Whereas, of all the western trails used by fur traders, gold seekers, 
        missionaries, and emigrants, the Oregon Trail was the most important to 
        the western settlement of this great Nation;
Whereas, in the year 1843, the first major wave of humanity left Independence, 
        Missouri and travelled 2,170 miles in covered wagons across sagebrush, 
        plains, mountains, and rivers to the Willamette Valley in Oregon 
        Territory;
Whereas over 400,000 men, women, and children risked their lives in this 
        greatest migration in American history;
Whereas this Nation was expanded from ocean to ocean, as settlement of the Old 
        Oregon Territory forced Great Britain to relinquish this land to the 
        United States;
Whereas the pioneering spirit of the Oregon Trail emigrants embodies the spirit 
        of the American people;
Whereas Americans have an ever-increasing desire to understand our national 
        heritage;
Whereas, in 1978, Congress enacted the National Trails System Act, designating 
        the Oregon Trail as a national historic trail, in recognition of the 
        vital role it played in our Nation's history; and
Whereas, in 1993, the American people will seek to rekindle the pioneering 
        spirit of the ``Great Migration'' and an official Oregon Trail 
        sesquicentennial wagon train will journey across the Nation, arriving in 
        Oregon City, Oregon on September 4, 1993: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That September 4, 1993, is 
hereby designated as ``National Oregon Trail Day''. The President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe this day with the appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the Senate July 23 (legislative day, June 30), 1993.

            Attest:

                                             WALTER J. STEWART,

                                                             Secretary.
```
§ 1.62-1 Adjusted gross income. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Deductions allowable in computing adjusted gross income.* The deductions specified in section 62(a) for purposes of computing adjusted gross income are— ( 1 ) Deductions set forth in § 1.62-1T(c); and
( 2 ) Deductions allowable under part VI, subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code, (section 161 and following) that consist of expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer in connection with the performance of services as an employee under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement (as defined in § 1.62-2) with his or her employer. For the rules pertaining to expenses paid or incurred in taxable years beginning before January 1, 1989, see § 1.62-1T (c)(2) and (f) (as contained in 26 CFR part 1 (§§ 1.61 to 1.169) revised April 1, 1992).
( d ) - ( h ) [Reserved]
( i ) *Effective date.* Paragraph (c) of this section is effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1989.
[T.D. 8451, 57 FR 57668, Dec. 7, 1992; 57 FR 60568, Dec. 21, 1992]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)

AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Patrick W. Cavanagh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/ PATRICK W. CAVANAGH

Patrick W. Cavanagh

Chief Executive Officer

Williams Controls, Inc.

August9, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Fahed Mohammad Khan v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00327-CR

Trial court case number: 1467228

Trial court: 208th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Fahed Mohammad Khan, has filed a “Motion to Substitute Counsel,” 

by which Carmen Roe seeks “to substitute [for] current counsel, STEVEN ROSEN as 

counsel of record for Appellant.” Counsel represents that she “was recently retained by 

Appellant,” who “has requested this substitution”; “[o]n May 1, 2018 former counsel 

filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record that is pending before this Court”; and 

“this motion has been sent in writing to [appellant].” However, John T. Kovach signed

the notice of appeal on appellant’s behalf, and appellant’s motion to substitute does not 

indicate that Mr. Kovach or Mr. Rosen requests to withdraw from representing appellant 

on appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1, 6.5. And, neither Mr. Kovach nor Mr. Rosen have 

filed a motion to withdraw in this Court. Finally, the motion does not show that it was 

delivered to appellant “in person or mailed—both by certified and by first-class mail at 

his last known address.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). Accordingly, the motion to 

substitute is denied.

By filing the motion to substitute, Carmen Roe has appeared as counsel of record 

for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.2, 9.1. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 15, 2018