alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DAWANTAYE BOSWELL , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:11

- cr - 00032

- FPS

- RWT

1 ; 5:14

- cv - 00131

- FPS

- RWT )

Submitted : March 30, 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dawantaye Boswell, Appellant Pro Se

. Shawn Michael Adkins , Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, Randolph John Bernard , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , John Castle Parr , Assistant United States Attorney , Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dawantaye Boswell seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the

recomme ndation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealabili ty will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists woul d find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural groun ds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and co nclude that Boswell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Boswell’s motions for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exh. 10.32.3 SERP Officers Amend. No. 3


Exhibit 10.32.3




AMENDMENT NO. 3 

TO

SPECIAL SEVERANCE PROGRAM FOR OFFICERS OF 

NORTHEAST UTILITIES SYSTEM COMPANIES







The Special Severance Program for Officers of Northeast Utilities System Companies (the “Plan”), is hereby amended, effective September 12, 2006, as follows:




Article VIII, Subsection (a) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:




“(a)

Amendment or Termination.  Prior to the occurrence of a Change of Control, the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board may amend or discontinue this Program at any time upon providing prior written notice to each Participant specifying the changes to be made.  Any amendment will not be effective until at least two years following such notice, except in the case of an amendment that does not materially impact the timing or amount of benefit provided or is required under statute, regulation, other law, or rule of a governing or administrative body having the effect of a statute or regulation.  Upon and following a Change of Control, this Program may not be amended or terminated in any way that would eliminate or reduce the payments and benefits owing to Participants under the Program.”
EXHIBIT 10.3


                       HYDRO ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, INC.

                              CONSULTING AGREEMENT


The following is a letter of intent drawn between David Rosenberg and Hydro
Environmental Resources, Inc. for the purpose of hiring David Rosenberg as a
Consultant to Hydro Environmental Resources, Inc. in the areas listed below.

David Rosenberg DR
Hydro Environmental Resources, Inc. HYDRO

DR, shall be a direct consultant to HYDRO in the capacity of fund raiser as well
as assist HYDRO in reviewing any and all contracts or agreements that HYDRO
shall enter into in regards to fund raising for the purpose of rendering
opinions and suggestions on such agreements.

DR shall communicate with, interview, evaluate and on a best efforts basis
attempt to solicit the services of a management and board of director team to
comprise of the following:

CEO
CFO
PR Personal
Marketing and Sales Group
And additional persons required to run and operate the day to day business of
HYDRO

DR shall also consult, advise and institute outside contracts with State,
Federal and Local Government in the areas of Defense, Funding Grants,
International Marketing, etc. etc.

DR although he will be a consultant to HYDRO and not a full time employee shall
advise and participate in the set up of a proper working office to include the
hiring of a company secretary, insurance carriers, internet and phone service
and various other services.

DR shall also perform additional other duties in areas to be reviewed by HYDRO
and DR from time to time in the course of commencing operation.

Compensation for the above consultation services named and un-named shall be as
follows:

One million shares of HYDRO common stock to be issued to DR forthwith
One million shares of HYDRO common stock to be issued at the rate of250,000
shares per quarter to commence on July 1, 2002.


/s/ Jack Wynn                               /s/ David Rosenberg
-------------                               -------------------
Jack Wynn, President                        David Rosenberg, Consultant
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38633-38634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


 Renewal of Charter for the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/
AIDS

AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary, Office of Public Health and Science.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As stipulated by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Services is hereby announcing renewal of the charter for the 
Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Bates, Interim 
Executive Director, PACHA, Department of Health and Human Services, 200 
Independence Avenue, SW., Room 443H; (202) 690-5560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PACHA was established by Executive Order 
12963, dated June 14, 1995, as amended by Executive Order 13009, dated 
June 14, 1996; and Section 222 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 217a). The Council was established to provide advice, 
information, and recommendations to the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services regarding programs and policies to promote effective 
prevention and cure of HIV disease and AIDS. The functions of the 
Council shall be solely advisory in nature.
    Since PACHA was established, renewal of its charter has been 
carried out at the appropriate intervals as stipulated by FACA. The 
previous Council charter was scheduled to expire on July 27, 2009. On 
July 24, 2009, the

[[Page 38634]]

Secretary of Health and Human Services approved for the Council charter 
to be renewed. Renewal of the PACHA charter provides authorization for 
the Council to operate until July 27, 2011.
    A copy of the Council charter is available on the PACHA Web site at 
http://www.pacha.gov. A copy of the Council charter also can be 
obtained by accessing the FACA database that is maintained by the 
Committee Management Secretariat under the General Services 
Administration. The Web site address for the FACA database is http://fido.gov/facadatabase.

    Dated: July 28, 2009.
Christopher H. Bates,
Interim Executive Director, Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS.
[FR Doc. E9-18572 Filed 8-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-43-P
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 85

To authorize the printing of additional copies of a Senate report entitled

‘‘Developments in Aging: 1992’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 31 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993

Mr. PRYOR submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of additional copies of a Senate

report entitled ‘‘Developments in Aging: 1992’’.

1 Resolved, That there shall be printed for the use of

2 the Special Committee on Aging, in addition to the usual

3 number of copies, the maximum number of copies of vol4 umes 1 and 2 of the annual report of the committee to

5 the Senate, entitled ‘‘Developments in Aging: 1992’’,

6 which additional copies may be printed at a cost not to

7 exceed $1,200.

Æ
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joseph Zumwalt, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 of Weida Communications, Inc.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  November 22, 2004 |                                         |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                         | /s/  Joseph Zumwalt |   |
|                     | **Joseph  Zumwalt  Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
1 The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3569

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Lorenzo Diaz, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 30, 2001 Filed: June 5, 2001

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Inthis appeal following the grant of a reduction in sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b), Lorenzo Diaz challenges the sentence imposed by the district court. 1 His counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court did not explain adequately its downward departure. Counsel’s arguments amount to a challenge of the extent of the departure. We have no jurisdiction to review on such grounds.-2-

See UnitedStates v. Coppedge , 135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal where Ander s brief challenged extent of Rule 35(b) reduction because appeal is not based on any criteria listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw. We also grant Diaz’s motion to seal the Anders brief and we direct the clerk to seal both the brief and the Rule 35(b) hearing transcript. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Overview of a Trajectory-Based Solution for En Route and Terminal Area Self-Spacing: Fourth RevisionThis paper presents an overview of the fourth major revision to an algorithm specifically designed to support NASA's Airborne Precision Spacing concept. This airborne self-spacing concept is trajectory-based, allowing for spacing operations prior to the aircraft being on a common path. Because this algorithm is trajectory-based, it also has the inherent ability to support required-time-of-arrival (RTA) operations. This algorithm was also designed specifically to support a standalone, non-integrated implementation in the spacing aircraft. Revisions to this algorithm were based on a change to the expected operational environment.Document ID20140002752Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAbbott, Terence S.*(Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. (SGT, Inc.) Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredApril 8, 2014Publication DateSeptember 1, 2013Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2013-218044NF1676L-17381Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 411931.02.01.07.13.05CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL10AA14BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20140002752.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5175 Carotid artery clamp. ( a ) *Identification.* A carotid artery clamp is a device that is surgically placed around a patient's carotid artery (the principal artery in the neck that supplies blood to the brain) and has a removable adjusting mechanism that protrudes through the skin of the patient's neck. The clamp is used to occlude the patient's carotid artery to treat intracranial aneurysms (balloonlike sacs formed on blood vessels) or other intracranial vascular malformations that are difficult to attach directly by reducing the blood pressure and blood flow to the aneurysm or malformation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA 

No. 17–1909 

Monona County No. SRCR016184 

STATE OF IOWA,

 Appellee, 

vs. 

LORI DEE MATHES,

 Appellant. 

 The court, McDermott, J., taking no part, being evenly divided, declares 

this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2020). 

 Christensen, C.J., and Waterman and Mansfield, JJ., would affirm the 

court of appeals decision dismissing the appeal from the district court order 

assessing court costs; Appel, McDonald, and Oxley, JJ., would vacate the court 

of appeals decision and vacate the district court’s cost award. “When the 

supreme court is equally divided on an issue . . . , the decision of the district 

court is affirmed by operation of law.” State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 

2009). 

Copies to: 

Rees Conrad Douglas 

The Benson Building 

705 Douglas Street, Suite 323 

Sioux City, IA 51101 

Kevin Cmelik 

Martha E. Trout 

Assistant Attorneys General 

Criminal Appeals Division 

Second Floor, Hoover Building 

Des Moines, IA 50319 

1 of 3

ELECTRONICALLY FILED MAY 08, 2020 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
Rita N. Bettis Austen 

ACLU of Iowa 

505 Fifth Avenue, Suite 901 

Des Moines, IA 50306 

Lisa Ann Foster 

1701 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

Alexander Vincent Kornya 

Iowa Legal Aid 

1111 – 9th Street, Suite 230 

Des Moines, IA 50309 

Martha J. Lucey 

State Appellate Defender 

4th Floor, Lucas Building 

321 E. 12th Street 

Des Moines, IA 50319 

Alan R. Ostergren 

Muscatine County Attorney 

Muscatine, IA 52761 

2 of 3
State of Iowa Courts

Case Number Case Title

17-1909 State v. Mathes

So Ordered

Electronically signed on 2020-05-08 07:57:44

3 of 3
# Fourth Court **of Appeals San Antonio, Texas** 
December 16, 2019
No. 04

- 19

- 00494

- CR
Richard A. CANTU , Jr. , Appellant

v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas Trial Court No. 17

- 11

- 293

- CRW Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### ORDER After we granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief, A ppellant’s brief was due on December 9 , 2019

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). After the once extended due date , Appellant filed a second motion , which seeks a twenty

- day extension of time to file the brief

. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED ; Appellant’s brief is due on Dec ember 30 , 2019

. Any furt her motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s brief is discouraged

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and aff ixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: Andy Sajor [andy_sajor@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:40 AM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: Cape Air vs. Cogan 

Dear Sirs: 

Having flown Cape Air many times, I found the aircraft to be quite acceptable, the price more than fair, and the 

schedule extremely convenient. If Cape Air is a commuter airline that is supposed to serve the needs of our 

local area, not that of the greater Montreal population, why would want to pay more for less? Just to have a 

bigger aircraft? I think the local population would'weigh in with a firm No! To begin with, Cape Air flights are 

seldom full, and if their loads increase, I understand they are ready to add capacity. As I understand it, EAS is 

designed to aid a community that would not normally be able to sustain frequent air service without a subsidy, 

Why would we waste this valuable resource on a company with a poor track record, when we have one 

operating here with a proven one? Please consider all aspects of the issue before you pull the plug on Cape Air. 

This issue can always be revisited if the community needs increase or change. 

Sincerely 

Andrew Sajor 

41 Trafalgar Drive 

Plattsburgh, NY 12901 

1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 22 DB 2021 (No. 26 RST 2021)

:

MEAGHAN ELIZABETH CHIRILLO : Attorney Registration No. 308152

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : ( Indiana County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of May

, 202 1 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated April 29 , 2021

, is approved and it is ORDERED that

Meaghan Elizabeth Chirillo

, who has been on Inactive Status

, h as demonstrated that s he

has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner

.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Neenah Enterprises, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(a) or
Rule 15d- 14(a) , as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Neenah Enterprises, Inc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert E. Ostendorf, Jr.Robert E. Ostendorf, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer