Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

BerkeleyPoint Capital LLC

 

Wehave examined management’s****assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Compliancewith Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB, that Berkeley Point Capital LLC (the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation ABfor the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, except forItems 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(vii)and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to theservicing platform covered by this report. Refer to Appendix A of Management’s Assessment of Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB for the asset backed transactions covered by this platform.****Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on ourexamination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountantsand the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactionsand securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform and determiningwhether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicingcriteria and as permitted by Regulation AB Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations of the Division of Corporation Finance, Section200.06, “Vendors Engaged by Servicers” (C&DI 200.06). Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selectedtransactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balancesor amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or anyother transactions. Although the Company is responsible for assessing compliance with Items 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(vi),1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv) of Regulation AB, there were no servicing activities performed by the Companyduring the year ended December 31, 2017 that required these servicing criteria to be complied with. We believe that the evidencewe obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

 

Asdescribed in management’s assertion, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi) and 1122(d)(2)(vii)**,**theCompany has engaged a vendor to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that thisvendor is not considered a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected totake responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria applicable to this vendor as permitted byC&DI 200.06. As permitted by C&DI 200.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designedto provide reasonable assurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all material respects with servicing criteria applicableto this vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply C&DI 200.06for the vendor and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company’seligibility to apply C&DI 200.06.****

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB, including servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi) and 1122(d)(2)(vii)forwhich compliance is determined based on C&DI 200.06 as described above, as of and for the year****ended December31, 2017 for the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions****platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

 

February22, 2018