alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, May 8, 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00326

- CV

____________ LG CHEM, LTD. , Appellant

V.

MICHAEL TURNER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. 2018

- 44826



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 02, 2019

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’ s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Norma Duarte , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 235

To print as a Senate document a collection of statements made in tribute

to the late First Lady of the United States, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself, Mr. DOLE, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOREN, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr. DODD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. GLENN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. HEFLIN, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr. KERRY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MATHEWS, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. PELL, Mr. REID, Mr. RIEGLE, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr.

SIMON, Mr. WELLSTONE, and Mr. WOFFORD) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To print as a Senate document a collection of statements

made in tribute to the late First Lady of the United

States, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis.

1 Resolved, That there shall be printed as a Senate doc2 ument a collection of statements made in tribute to the

3 late First Lady of the United States, Jacqueline Kennedy

4 Onassis, together with appropriate illustrations and other

5 materials relating to her death.

Æ
exv10w15



 






EXHIBIT 10.15




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

(Effective as of January 1, 2006)




W I T N E S S E T H




     WHEREAS, Smith International, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Smith International, Inc.
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the purpose of providing bonus incentives
to executives officers of the Company; and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Article IX of the Plan, the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”) has reserved the right to amend
the Plan at any time; and



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee now desires to amend the Plan to eliminate or clarify
certain cross-references therein;



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 2006, the Plan is hereby amended by this First
Amendment thereto, as follows:




	 	1.	 	Section 1.2 of the Plan is revised to completely eliminate and remove the
reference therein to Section 8.3 of the Plan.
	 
	 	2.	 	Section 1.7 of the Plan is revised to change the references therein to Section
1.6 to Section 1.7.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to the Plan is hereby executed on this 17th day of
October, 2006, to be effective as of January 1, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	 	 	SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ PAMELA L. KUNKEMOELLER
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ RICHARD E. CHANDLER, JR.
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Pamela L. Kunkemoeller
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Richard E. Chandler, Jr.
	Title:

	 	Senior Corporate Counsel and
Assistant Secretary
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary






105
Ex-(10)(p)



 





Exhibit
(10)(p)

June 22, 2004




Ms. Jean E. Davis

[Address]

Charlotte, NC [zip code]




Re: Employment Agreement




Dear Jean,




As we discussed, I want to clarify certain matters related to your employment agreement. As you
know, your employment agreement with Wachovia provides you with the option to make “Good Reason”
termination of your employment with Wachovia for any reason during the period from January 1, 2004
to June 30, 2004. The Management Resources and Compensation Committee at its April 19, 2004
meeting approved modifying your agreement to provide you with the option to make a “Good Reason”
termination of your employment with Wachovia for any reason during the period from January 1, 2006
to March 31, 2006.



In addition, I am pleased to advise you that you have been awarded a stock option grant on 36,256
shares with a stock price of $45.02 and a restricted stock award of 9,789 shares.



Very truly yours,




G. Kennedy Thompson





			
	cc:	 	Paul George
Chuck Loring
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 157 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con. Res.157
                                                Agreed to March 29, 1996

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                          Concurrent Resolution

 
        Providing for an adjournment or recess of the two Houses.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, March 
29, 1996, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, April 15, 
1996, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
at the close of business on Friday, March 29, 1996, Saturday, March 30, 
1996, or Sunday, March 31, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the 
Majority Leader or his designee in accordance with this resolution, it 
stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 15, 1996, or 
until such time on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader 
or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
H. Con. Res. 106 Agreed to December 22, 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used

from 8 o’clock ante meridiem until 3 o’clock post meridiem on

April 16, 1996, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration

of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical

preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance

with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:  November 11, 2004               /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                      Title:    President and Treasurer

                                      A   signed   original   of  this   written
                                      statement required by Section 906 has been
                                      provided to CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. and
                                      will be  retained by CNL Income Fund VIII,
                                      Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
                                      Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon
                                      request.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific Inc on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard Osser Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Leonard Osser
-----------------

Leonard Osser
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
Exhibit 35.15

| |  | Corporate Trust Services
    MAC R1204-010
    9062 Old Annapolis Road
    Columbia, MD 21045
    Tel: 410 884 2000
    Fax: 410 715 2380
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------













|RE: |  | Annual
                                         Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C31 Commercial
                                         Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015- C31
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Per
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and
for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):



(a)
A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under
such officer's supervision; and



(b)
To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







March
1, 2016





|/s/: Brian Smith
|----------------
|BRIAN SMITH     
|Vice President  







|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | 
|---------------------- |
DISMISSED; and Opinion Filed October 11, 2016.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-00586-CV

JUSTIN P. ANDERSON, Appellant

V.

JUAN MANUEL CAMPOS AND ROSA MARIE CAMPOS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-03001-L

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Myers

On October 3, 2016, appellant and appellees filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal 

with prejudice. In the motion, the parties state they have settled and compromised all claims 

between them. We grant the agreed motion and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a).

160586F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JUSTIN P. ANDERSON, Appellant

No. 05-16-00586-CV V.

JUAN MANUEL CAMPOS AND ROSA 

MARIE CAMPOS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-03001-L.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Justices 

Lang and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED with 

prejudice.

Based on the parties’ agreement, it is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of 

this appeal.

Judgment entered this 11th day of October, 2016.
AMENDMENT NO



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE

A.LPHARMA INC. SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 


The Alpharma Inc. Supplemental Pension Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of June 22, 2006, as follows:

1.    Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first paragraph thereof and replacing it with the following:
"While the Company expect to continue the Plan, the Company, acting through its Board of Directors, must necessarily reserve and hereby does reserve the right to amend the Plan from time to time, provided, that no amendment of the Plan may cause the reduction or cessation of any benefits that were accrued as of the date of such amendment and otherwise would be payable under the plan, but for such amendment. 



Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors has delegated to the executive management Benefits Committee the authority to adopt administrative amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not involve a change in the costs or liability of the Company or alter the benefits payable thereunder.  The Board of Directors has delegated to the Compensation Committee the authority to adopt all other amendments to the Plan, provided, that such amendments do not significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or  are  required  to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or the regulations thereunder.  The Board of Directors retains the authority to adopt amendments to the Plan that significantly increase or decrease benefit amounts, or are required to be adopted by the Board of Directors under the Code or regulations thereunder.



The Company, acting through its Board of Directors, may terminate the Plan at any time, provided, that no such termination may cause the reduction or cessation of any benefits that were accrued as of the date of such amendment and otherwise would be payable under the plan, but for such amendment."





2.    Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the phrase, "through its Board of Directors", immediately after the term "Company" in the first sentence thereof."  



***

	
/s/ George P. Rose
	
October 23, 2006______________

	
     ALPHARMA INC.
	
 DATE
" MlUU'Ill\ (;l\PIT1\L**I.:\'vEST:HE.:\'T~ I~T.**  2101 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 1700

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98121 TEL: 206-382-0640 FAX: 206-625-0089

The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear Secretary LaHood:



### " ,**~**

### OJ! behalfofMaruha Capital Investment, Inc., I am writing to express our strong sUpport for the application ofDelta AirLines for new nonstop service between Seattle and Haneda, Tokyo International Airport. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are many Japanese companies located in Washington, and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created demand (orincreased capacity to Tokyo. 

### Our business travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport.

Seattle is proven and successfUf gatc;rway to Asia, and as airports that can support trans-pacific routes. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly**bene~t,O\lr:travelers.** . . .<

, , '**','~** " .

; ; > 1**~** •
#### § 1.536-1 Short taxable years.

Accumulated taxable income for a taxable year consisting of a period of less than 12 months shall not be placed on an annual basis for the purpose of the accumulated earnings tax imposed by section 531. In such cases accumulated taxable income shall be computed on the basis of the taxable income for such period of less than 12 months, adjusted in the manner provided by section 535(b) and § 1.535-2.
exv10w5



 





Exhibit 10.5




Summary of Sprint Nextel Corporation’s 2007 Short-Term Incentive Plan




     The Sprint Nextel Corporation 2007 Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 STI Plan”) provides
for a payment of incentive compensation to officers and other eligible employees based on the
achievement of specified objectives with respect to the following performance metrics during 2007:
adjusted OIBDA (operating income plus depreciation, amortization and special items), weighted at
30%; a measure of retention of our post-paid wireless subscribers, which we refer to as post-paid
churn, weighted at 30%; net service revenue, weighted at 20%; and one or more financial or
operational functional objectives that will be aligned with each participant’s function, weighted
at 20%.



     The award payments under the 2007 STI Plan will be determined based on our 2007 results using
three variables: (1) the individual’s annual incentive target opportunity, which is based on a
percentage of the individual’s base salary; (2) our performance compared with each of the
above-referenced performance objectives; and (3) relative weightings for the performance
objectives. Each of the performance objectives have a threshold, target and maximum level of
payment opportunity with the maximum payment opportunity equal to 120% of the individual’s target
opportunity for the functional objective and 200% of the individual’s target opportunity for the
corporate objectives, except for the OIBDA measure, which has no maximum. The payout for Gary D.
Forsee, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is capped at 200% of his target opportunity, per
his employment agreement. An eligible employee’s incentive target opportunity will be multiplied
by the weightings and the payout results for the performance objectives to calculate a potential
incentive award amount, which, under certain circumstances and subject to certain limitations, may
be adjusted based on individual performance so that the employee receives a bonus payment of 0 to
120% of the potential incentive award amount. The determination of payments for certain executive
officers will be made so as to comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.



     Mr. Forsee’s employment agreement provides for a short-term target incentive opportunity of
not less than 170% of his base salary.



     The actual incentive amounts paid under the 2007 STI Plan will be based on our actual results
in 2007 in relation to the established performance objectives, and these payments may be greater or
less than the target amounts that have been established.
#### § 1.812-6 New company defined.

Section 812(e) provides that for purposes of part I, subchapter L, chapter 1 of the Code, a life insurance company is a “new company” for any taxable year only if such taxable year begins not more than 5 years after the first day on which it (or any predecessor if section 381(c)(22) applies or would have applied if in effect) was authorized to do business as an insurance company.

[T.D. 7326, 39 FR 35354, Oct. 1, 1974]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7541

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT J. MERRITT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR95-167-S, CA-98-321-S, CA-97-3672-S) Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert J. Merritt, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen O’Connell Gavin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* To the extent Merritt seeks to appeal the district court’sdenial of his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), entered on March 16, 1999, we find that such appeal also is untimely. 2 PER CURIAM: Robert J. Merritt seeks to appeal the district court’s finalsentencing judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Merritt’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded sixty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).The district court’s order was entered on the docket on October 30, 1995. Merritt’s notice of appeal was filed on October 25, 1999. Because Merritt failed to file a timely notice of appeal orto obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. * We deny Merritt’s motion for transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED