alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 2140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP10-134-000; RP09-423-000; RP09-423-002]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Technical 
Conference

January 6, 2010.
    Take notice that Commission Staff will convene a technical 
conference in the above-referenced proceedings on Tuesday, January 19, 
2010 at 10 a.m. (EST), in a room to be designated at the offices of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    The purpose of the technical conference is to consider the issues 
raised by Columbia Gulf Transmission Company's (Columbia Gulf) 
Incentive Fixed Fuel filing in Docket No. RP10-134-000 and what 
changes, if any, might be necessary or appropriate. Because Columbia 
Gulf's Incentive Fixed Fuel filing presents interrelated issues with 
the Transportation Retainage Adjustment filing in Docket Nos. RP09-423-
000 and RP09-423-002, the technical conference will also consider the 
issues raised in those dockets that relate to the Incentive Fixed Fuel 
proposal.
    Commission Staff and interested persons will have the opportunity 
to discuss all of the issues raised by Columbia Gulf's filings. 
Specifically, Columbia Gulf should be prepared to address all the 
concerns raised in the protests, and if necessary, to provide 
additional technical, engineering and operational support for its 
proposals. Any party proposing alternatives to Columbia Gulf's 
proposals should also be prepared to similarly support its position.
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95f4f6f6f0e6e6fcf7fcf9fce1ecd5f3f0e7f6bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c8cacaccdadac0cbc0c5c0ddd0e9cfccdbca87cec6df">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or (202) 502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-2106 
with the required accommodations.
    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further 
information please contact Anna Fernandez at (202) 502-6682 or e-mail 
Anna <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cb8daeb9a5aaa5afaeb18badaeb9a8e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cb8daeb9a5aaa5afaeb18badaeb9a8e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-516 Filed 1-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>                   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                           INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q DATED
                           SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                           ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                           STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                        146980
<SECURITIES>                  1185780
<RECEIVABLES>                 93542
<ALLOWANCES>                  5027
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1586120
<PP&E>                        168850
<DEPRECIATION>                111457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                2211598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         249357
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      225
<OTHER-SE>                    1698995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  2211598
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              339157
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 263289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               62906
<INCOME-TAX>                  25100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           24440
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  24440
<EPS-BASIC>                 1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                 1.08


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     428,870
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              292,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                                45,900
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           849,253
<PP&E>                                                   2,109,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1,243,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,789,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,269,258
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                  1,778
<COMMON>                                                     6,068
<OTHER-SE>                                                 136,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             1,789,709
<SALES>                                                     76,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            76,189
<CGS>                                                       21,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            1,788,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          14,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (1,717,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (1,717,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (1,717,537)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8097 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8097

        To reauthorize the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2024

 Ms. Maloy (for herself and Mr. Owens) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To reauthorize the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``RECA Extension Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION ACT.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(d) of the Radiation Exposure 
Compensation Act (Public Law 101-426; 42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended 
by striking the first sentence and inserting ``The Fund shall terminate 
on the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of the RECA 
Extension Act of 2024.''.
    (b) Limitation on Claims.--Section 8(a) of the Radiation Exposure 
Compensation Act (Public Law 101-426; 42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended 
by striking ``the RECA Extension Act of 2022'' and inserting ``the RECA 
Extension Act of 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas Hammen, d/b/a Hammen Electric Company, Plaintiff, v. Hansen & Werhane, Inc., Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Third-Party Defendant, Appellant.

Gen. No. 68-35.

Third District.

February 7, 1969.

James L. Waring, of Ottawa, and Dent, Hampton & Doten, of Chicago, for appellant; White & Sinon, of Ottawa, for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE ALLOY.

Not to be published in full.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40786

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN HUERTA-TORRES, also known as Juan Manuel Huerta-Torres, also 

known as Antonio Martinez-Vega, also known as Juan Manuel Huerta,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:16-CR-972-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Huerta-Torres has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Huerta-Torres has filed responses. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Huerta-Torres’s 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40786 Document: 00514523903 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2018
No. 17-40786

2

responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40786 Document: 00514523903 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2018
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 20

Reappointing Kenneth U. Benjamin, Jr., as Deputy Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Reappointing Kenneth U. Benjamin, Jr., as Deputy Senate

Legal Counsel.

1 Resolved, That the reappointment of Kenneth U.

2 Benjamin, Jr., to be Deputy Senate Legal Counsel, made

3 by the President pro tempore of the Senate this day, shall

4 be effective January 3, 1993, and the term of service of

5 the appointee shall expire at the end of the One Hundred

6 Fourth Congress.

Æ
#### § 1.6102-1 Computations on returns or other documents.

For provisions with respect to the rounding off to whole-dollar amounts of money items on returns and accompanying schedules, see § 301.6102-1 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration).

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12137, Nov. 26, 1960]
#### § 1.547-4 Effect on dividends paid deduction.

The deficiency dividends deduction shall be allowed as of the date the claim is filed. No duplication of deductions with respect to any deficiency dividends is permitted. If a corporation claims and receives the benefit of the provisions of section 547 (or the corresponding section 506 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, or section 407 of the Revenue Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 447)), based upon a distribution of deficiency dividends, that distribution does not become a part of the dividends paid deduction under section 561. Likewise, it will not be made the basis of a dividends paid deduction under section 561 by reason of the application of section 563(b), relating to dividends paid after the close of the taxable year and on or before the 15th day of the third month following the close of such taxable year.
Acceptance of Preferred Stock Agreement




Acceptance of Preferred Stock Agreement

Between:



Klondike Star Mineral Corporation (Klondike Star)



and



Kluane Basic Industries, Ltd. a British Columbia corporation (Kluane)

This letter of agreement ("Agreement") dated this ____ day of November, 2006,
constitutes the understanding and fulfillment of the 2003 Assignment and
Assumption of Option Agreement between Klondike Star, Kluane and other parties
regarding the issuance of convertible preferred stock of Klondike Star.

Whereas, in consideration for the assignment of an earned-in agreement from
Kluane to Klondike Star, Klondike Star agreed to issue 2,000,000 shares of
convertible preferred stock, to be convertible, at least in part, into common
stock of Klondike Star; and

Whereas, the parties have undertaken to negotiate the terms of the
convertible preferred stock and agree for the issuance of such stock; it is
agreed as follows:

 

Klondike Star will issue 2,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible
      Preferred Stock to Kluane, the terms of which are attached hereto as
      Exhibit A, have been approved by the Board of Directors of Klondike Star
      and the designation of which will be filed with the Delaware Secretary of
      State.

      Release of Klondike Star and Kluane. Upon signing of this agreement,
      each party hereto hereby releases and forever discharges the other party,
      his, hers or its agents, insurers, attorneys and representatives from any
      and all rights, claims, demands and damages of any kind, known or unknown,
      existing or arising in the future, resulting from or related to any
      business agreement, contract, whether verbal or in writing that exists or
      did exist between the parties relating to the issuance of preferred stock
      to Kluane.

      Should either party attempt to collect any amount from or enforce any
      right against the other, the prevailing party shall be entitled to
      attorney fees, costs, including litigation costs and costs on appeal.

       

    
  

Accepted and Agreed to:

KLONDIKE STAR MINERAL CORPORATION:

By: _______________________

Its: ________________________

KLUANE BASIC INDUSTRIES, LTD:

By: _______________________

Its: ________________________
#### §§ 1.45-1-1.45-5 [Reserved]
OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 1 AUSTIN



## tfr. 3. a. wi11ienle CountyAuditor, Tarrant County Fort Xorth, Texas

Dear Sir:

the terms OP nt Incumbenta.

ains only to countiaa and not 18sS tilan

142-B, Section 3, as to,,tbe that the Juvenile Departve under existln~ law. oplaion on the tollorin~il : ing Article 5142-B-Section 3: 'IThere shallbe one Chief Probation Officer, and suchnumber OSAssistants not exceeding eight as shallbe aut:?orised by the Juvenile Board. Said Chief Pro?ation Of'fioer and Asei+anta to be appointedby t‘ ne CountjTJudge, and con.firmed by the Juvenile Board, and such power of appointment and confirmation of such officers aa oonferredby this Act shall not be effective until the expiration of the terns of offices of the present incumbentsof such Off108a.fter 299,

Officer, nHouse Bill number 349, a ner law, ChapYouse 3111 number 349-Sectisn 3:

"*There shall be one Chief Pro'sation and such number ofAssistants not exceediw ten (10)as may be authoriaed by the Juvenile Board. Said Chief Probation Officer shall be appointed by the Juvenile Board and said Officer shall appoint said Asaistaats, sub- !:::dtsuoh 'p o confirmation by the Juvenile Roardt !F oner of appointment a‘zdconfirma on anal1 not become effective -Untiltileexpiration of the current terms of the present incumbents of such offices.~ Approved iday10, 1943, Effective Hay 10, 1943.

"Can the JuvenileDepartment raise the nuder of assistants from eight as was set out in Article 5142-B to ten aa was set out in **Bouse** Bill Xo. 349 before the expirationof the CUrrent term of the present incumbent's term of such offices?' (RmphasisOurs)

Under the old law,Article 5142-3, Section 3, V.A.C.S., quoted above, the county judge appointed **tile** Chief Probation Officer and his assistantswitiithe confirmation of the Juvenile Board. Tie new law, Ii.R. 349, RegUlar Session, 48th Legislature, quoted above, amendad the former,law and provided that thepower of appoint:zentof the Chief PI?obatlon Officer should lie with the **JUV8nil8** Board aildthat he s;lould appoint his asszkstantssubject to the confirmation of t;le Juvenile Board. The statute then specifieswhen the power of a22oi:ltment shallbecome effective "provided suchpower of appointment and confirmation shallnot become effective until the expiration of the current terms of **tine** present incumbents of such offices." This lanyuase is plain and unambiguous and, therefore, isnot subject t0 ConstrUction.

You are advised that thepower of appointment and confirmation is non-existent until tineterms of the Incumbents expire.
,L?. 1543 Yours very truly

,,
"---F---g .c : DWIi:RP
The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3748

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Richard Charles Berry, *

* [PUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: March 6, 1998

 Filed: March 11, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Richard Charles Berry appeals the 37-month sentence imposed by the District

Court after he pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 44 kilograms of

1

marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (1994). For reversal, Berry argues that the

District Court erred in enhancing his base offense level for possessing firearms during

a drug offense because the firearms were found in a bedroom of his residence and the
-2-

marijuana was found in his truck parked outside of the residence. We disagree, and

affirm.

A sentencing court must add two levels to a defendant&s base offense level if a

dangerous weapon, including a firearm, was possessed during a drug offense; the

enhancement is appropriate where a firearm is present “unless it is clearly improbable

that the weapon was connected with the offense.” U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 2D1.1(b)(1) & cmt. 3 (1997). Berry admitted that he possessed two firearms; that

the two firearms were loaded; that cash and scales used for weighing marijuana were

found in the bedroom with the firearms; and that he placed the 44 kilograms of

marijuana in his truck and parked the vehicle at his home, intending to deliver the

marijuana at a later date. Based on those facts, we conclude the District Court did not

clearly err in assessing the enhancement. See United States v. Vaughn, 111 F.3d 610,

616 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review); United States v. Betz, 82 F.3d 205, 210-11

(8th Cir. 1996) (holding that application of § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement was not clear

error where firearms and drugs were found in different places on defendant&s property);

United States v. Hiveley, 61 F.3d 1358, 1362-63 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (holding

that application of § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement was not clearly erroneous where

firearms were found in one trailer on defendant&s property and drugs were found in

different trailer, despite defendant&s argument that there was no evidence he had ever

used firearms during drug transaction).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 10.43 Named Executive Officer Compensation Summary


    Exhibit
      10.43

    


    PINNACLE
      FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.

    Named
      Executive Officer Compensation Summary

    


    The
      following table sets forth the current base salaries paid to the Chief Executive
      Officer and the four other named executive officers of Pinnacle Financial
      Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) and the amount of the cash bonus paid to these
      persons in 2007 under the Company’s 2006 Cash Incentive Plan. 

    


    
      	
              Executive
                Officer

            	
              Current
                Salary

            	
              2006
                Cash Bonus

            
	 	 	 
	
              M.
                Terry Turner - CEO

            	
              $
                532,000

            	
              $165,000

            
	
              Robert
                A. McCabe, Jr. - Chairman of the Board

            	
              $
                505,400

            	
              $156,750

            
	
              Hugh
                M. Queener - CAO

            	
              $
                280,000

            	
                $86,800

            
	
              Harold
                R. Carpenter - CFO

            	
              $
                275,000

            	
                
                $62,800

            
	
              Charles
                B. McMahan - Sr. Credit Officer

            	
              $
                186,000

            	
                
                $46,300

            


    

     

    In
      addition to their base salaries, these executive officers are also eligible
      to:


     

    	·  	
            Receive
              cash bonuses under the Company's 2007 Cash Incentive Plan;
              

          


     

    	·  	
            Participate
              in the Company's equity incentive programs, which currently involves
              the
              award of non-qualified stock options and restricted stock pursuant
              to the
              Company's 2004 Equity Incentive Plan; and

          


     

    	·  	
            Participate
              in the Company's broad-based benefit programs generally available to
              its
              employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs
              and
              the Company’s 401k plan. 

          


     

    Additionally,
      Messrs. Turner, McCabe and Queener receive a monthly car allowance.

     

    The
      foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional information regarding
      the
      named executive officer compensation will be provided in the Company’s proxy
      statement to be filed in connection with the 2007 annual meeting of the
      Company’s shareholders.