alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Mickey Bowman <mbowman@gosilver.com> Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:06 AM VanDerBellen, Alexander; Adams, Kevin (OST) Re: Meridian, MS EAS - Silver 

## ZDI

# l HAY - I 

# P I: 08 Yes, SilverAirways is interested and would appreciate a two week extension ifat all possible. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: 

### "VanDerBellen, Alexander" <sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com> Date: 

### Tue, 1May 2012 10:23:22-0400 To: 

### 'Kevin.Adams@dot.gov'<Kevin.Adams@dot.gov> Cc: 'mbowman@gosilver.com'<mbowman@gosilver.com> Subject: 

### Meridian, MS EAS
- Silver Kevin As mentioned, Silver is studying an EAS bid for Meridian. Mickey would like to request a two week extension. I am copying him here to confirm Silver's reque·st for extension ofthe bid deadline. Regards Sascha

1
§ 1.1082-1 Basis for determining gain or loss. ( a ) For determining the basis of property acquired in a taxable year beginning before January 1, 1942, in any manner described in section 372 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 prior to its amendment by the Revenue Act of 1942 (56 Stat. 798), see such section (before its amendment by such Act).
( b ) If the property was acquired in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1941, in any manner described in section 1082 (other than subsection (a)(2)), or section 372 (other than subsection (a)(2)) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 after its amendments, the basis shall be that prescribed in section 1082 with respect to such property. However, in the case of property acquired in a transaction described in section 1081(c)(2), this paragraph is applicable only if the property was acquired in a distribution made in a taxable year subject to the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
( c ) Section 1082 makes provisions with respect to the basis of property acquired in a transfer in connection with which the recognition of gain or loss is prohibited by the provisions of section 1081 with respect to the whole or any part of the property received. In general, and except as provided in § 1.1082-3, it is intended that the basis for determining gain or loss pertaining to the property prior to its transfer, as well as the basis for determining the amount of depreciation or depletion deductible and the amount of earnings or profits available for distribution, shall continue notwithstanding the nontaxable conversion of the asset in form or its change in ownership. The continuance of the basis may be reflected in a shift thereof from one asset to another in the hands of the same owner, or in its transfer with the property from one owner into the hands of another. See also § 1.1081-2.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Water content of micas and chlorites

#### Professional Paper 474-F

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp474F 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:16
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.39

IBIS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION HAS OMITTED FROM THIS EXHIBIT 10.39 PORTIONS OF 
THE EXHIBIT FOR WHICH IT HAS REQUESTED CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FROM THE 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THE PORTIONS OF THE AGREEMENT FOR WHICH 
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED ARE MARKED [    ] AND SUCH 
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND 
EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

[LETTERHEAD]

April 14, 1998

IBIS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
32A Cherry Hill Drive
Danvers, MA  01923
U.S.A.

Attention:  Mr. Al Alioto, Vice President, Sales & Marketing

Re: Purchase Order for This 1000 Implanter

Dear Sirs:

This letter serves as our formal purchase order for the Ibis 1000 Implanter, the
specifications of which are summarized in the Appendix A attached, according to
the following terms and conditions.

(1)      Purchase Price:   [    ]
(2)      Payment Terms:

         - [ ] within [ ] days after Ibis' acceptance of this purchase order

         - [ ] upon completion of assembly, test and demonstration of the
designed capability to produce good quality SIMOX wafers at Ibis to the
specifications agreed between MSIL and Ibis

         - Balance upon installation test run and acceptance by MSIL in Japan,
such tests and acceptance criteria to be agreed between MSIL and Ibis prior to
shipment.

                       MITSUBISHI MATERIALS SILICON CORPORATION
                     314 NISHISANGAO NODA-SHI CHIBA-KEN 278 JAPAN

                                       20
<PAGE>

[LETTERHEAD]

(3)      Spares and Services
         Separate purchase orders will be placed for spare parts and services.

We will look forward to receiving your acceptance of this order. We would also
like to receive your latest delivery schedule for the equipment.

With. best regards.
Sincerely yours,

/s/ Yunchi Furukawa
Yunchi Furukawa
Managing Director

Attachment



                                       21
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.40

                                   APPENDIX A
                        Ibis 1000 Implanter Specification
                                     Summary

[    ]





                                       22
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40144

Summary Calendar

JEREMY JAMES HENDRICKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

MATT BINGHAM; PETER KEIM,

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:16-CV-942

Before BARKSDALE, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jeremy James Hendricks, Texas prisoner # 01491333 and proceeding pro 

se, challenges the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action (claiming a dueprocess violation) as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and, in 

the alternative, by the doctrines of qualified and absolute immunity. 

Hendricks does not present any bases challenging the court’s ruling his dueprocess claim is barred under Heck. His failure to point to any error in the 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 19, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40144 Document: 00514277715 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2017
No. 17-40144

2

court’s reasoning puts him in the same position as if he had not appealed the 

judgment. E.g., Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 

748 (5th Cir. 1987). This court liberally construes briefs filed by pro se

litigants, but even pro se parties must reasonably comply with Federal Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8). E.g., Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224–25 (5th 

Cir. 1993).

In the alternative, in his reply brief, in addressing appellees’ contentions 

regarding qualified and absolute immunity, Hendricks fails to brief any bases 

challenging the court’s alternative conclusion that the district attorney and 

assistant district attorney, involved in Hendricks’ prosecution for sexual 

assault of a child, were entitled to such immunity. Accordingly, he has 

abandoned this issue. Brinkmann, 813 F.2d at 748. 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-40144 Document: 00514277715 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2017
§ 1.63-1 Change of treatment with respect to the zero bracket amount and itemized deductions. ( a ) *In general.* An individual who files a return on which the individual itemizes deductions in accordance with section 63(g) may later make a change of treatment by recomputing taxable income for the taxable year to which that return relates without itemizing deductions. Similarly, an individual who files a return on which the individual computes taxable income without itemizing deductions may later make a change of treatment by itemizing deductions in accordance with section 63(g) in recomputing taxable income for the taxable year to which that return relates.
( b ) *No extension of time for claiming credit or refund.* A change of treatment described in paragraph (a) of this section does not extend the period of time prescribed in section 6511 within which the taxpayer may make a claim for credit or refund of tax.
( c ) *Special requirements if spouse filed separate return* — ( 1 ) *Requirements.* If the spouse of the taxpayer filed a separate return for a taxable year corresponding to the taxable year of the taxpayer, the taxpayer may not make a change of treatment described in paragraph (a) of this section for that year unless— ( i ) The spouse makes a change of treatment on the separate return consistent with the change of treatment sought by the taxpayer; and
( ii ) The taxpayer and the taxpayer's spouse file a consent in writing to the assessment of any deficiency of either spouse to the extent attributable to the change of treatment, even though the assessment of the deficiency would otherwise be prevented by the operation of any law or rule of law. The consent must be filed with the district director for the district in which the taxpayer applies for the change of treatment, and the period during which a deficiency may be assessed shall be established by agreement of the spouses and the district director.
( 2 ) *Corresponding taxable year.* A taxable year of one spouse corresponds to a taxable year of the other spouse if both taxable years end in the same calendar year. If the taxable year of one spouse ends with death, however, the corresponding taxable year of the surviving spouse is that in which the death occurs.
( d ) *Inapplicable if tax liability has been compromised.* The taxpayer may not make a change of treatment described in paragraph (a) of this section for any taxable year if— ( 1 ) The tax liability of the taxpayer for the taxable year has been compromised under section 7122; or
( 2 ) The tax liability of the taxpayer's spouse for a taxable year corresponding to the taxable year of the taxpayer has been compromised under section 7122. See paragraph (c)(2) of this section for the determination of a corresponding taxable year.
( e ) *Effective date.* This section applies to taxable years beginning after 1976.
[T.D. 7585, 44 FR 1105, Jan. 4, 1979]
Editorial Note on Part 201
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 69 FR 13717, Mar. 24, 2004.

§ 201.60 Principal display panel. The term *principal display panel,* as it applies to over-the-counter drugs in package form and as used in this part, means the part of a label that is most likely to be displayed, presented, shown, or examined under customary conditions of display for retail sale. The principal display panel shall be large enough to accommodate all the mandatory label information required to be placed thereon by this part with clarity and conspicuousness and without obscuring designs, vignettes, or crowding. Where packages bear alternate principal display panels, information required to be placed on the principal display panel shall be duplicated on each principal display panel. For the purpose of obtaining uniform type size in declaring the quantity of contents for all packages of substantially the same size, the term *area of the principal display panel* means the area of the side or surface that bears the principal display panel, which area shall be: ( a ) In the case of a rectangular package where one entire side properly can be considered to be the principal display panel side, the product of the height times the width of that side;
( b ) In the case of a cylindrical or nearly cylindrical container, 40 percent of the product of the height of the container times the circumference; and
( c ) In the case of any other shape of container, 40 percent of the total surface of the container: *Provided, however,* That where such container presents an obvious “principal display panel” such as the top of a triangular or circular package, the area shall consist of the entire top surface.
In determining the area of the principal display panel, exclude tops, bottoms, flanges at the tops and bottoms of cans, and shoulders and necks of bottles or jars. In the case of cylindrical or nearly cylindrical containers, information required by this part to appear on the principal display panel shall appear within that 40 percent of the circumference which is most likely to be displayed, presented, shown, or examined under customary conditions of display for retail sale.
<PAGE>





                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the six months ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Cohn, Chief
Financial Officer of Milestone, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of Milestone.


                              /s/ David Cohn
                              -----------------------------
                              David Cohn
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              August 14, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,840,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,560,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,321,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,275,891
<PP&E>                                      13,850,889
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,789,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,450,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,245,312
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           56,033
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,815,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,450,553
<SALES>                                      8,950,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,555,289
<CGS>                                        6,856,636
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,162,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,897,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                495,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            494,328
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   494,328
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
No. 07-14-00326-CR

B.J. Allen Galloway From the 108th District Court

 Appellant of Potter County

v. September 18, 2014

The State of Texas Opinion Per Curiam

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

§

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 18, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
confidential











ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE







Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer,
LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS,
as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-CCRE25 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of
this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.











|                  | 
|----------------- | 
|Leslie Hayton     | 
|Managing Director | 
|Wells Fargo Bank  | 























confidential
§ 1.74-1 Prizes and awards. ( a ) *Inclusion in gross income.* ( 1 ) Section 74(a) requires the inclusion in gross income of all amounts received as prizes and awards, unless such prizes or awards qualify as an exclusion from gross income under subsection (b), or unless such prize or award is a scholarship or fellowship grant excluded from gross income by section 117. Prizes and awards which are includible in gross income include (but are not limited to) amounts received from radio and television giveaway shows, door prizes, and awards in contests of all types, as well as any prizes and awards from an employer to an employee in recognition of some achievement in connection with his employment.
( 2 ) If the prize or award is not made in money but is made in goods or services, the fair market value of the goods or services is the amount to be included in income.
( b ) *Exclusion from gross income.* Section 74(b) provides an exclusion from gross income of any amount received as a prize or award, if ( 1 ) such prize or award was made primarily in recognition of past achievements of the recipient in religious, charitable, scientific, educational, artistic, literary, or civic fields;
( 2 ) the recipient was selected without any action on his part to enter the contest or proceedings; and
( 3 ) the recipient is not required to render substantial future services as a condition to receiving the prize or award. Thus, such awards as the Nobel prize and the Pulitzer prize would qualify for the exclusion. Section 74(b) does not exclude prizes or awards from an employer to an employee in recognition of some achievement in connection with his employment.
( c ) *Scholarships and fellowship grants.* See section 117 and the regulations thereunder for provisions relating to scholarships and fellowship grants.
39122.

#### SHAW v. THOMAS.

Decided March 14, 1962.

*Burt ■& Burt, H. P. Burt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Farkas, Landau & Davis, H. G. Bawls, James V. Davis,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

This court having reversed the judgment of the trial court *(Shaw v. Thomas,*105 Ga. App. 12, 123 SE2d 327), and the Supreme Court of Georgia having reversed the judgment of this *court_(Thomas v. Shaw,*217 Ga. 688, 124 SE2d 396), it but remains for us to replace the divot. The' judgment of this court rendered on November 16, 1961, is hereby vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, and the judgment of the trial court in overruling the general demurrer to the petition is

*Affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Bussell, J., concur.*