alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: steam_record <steam_record@erg.com>, <Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov>

Date: 9/8/2010 11:21 AM

Subject: Fw: Effluent Guideline ICR Extension Request

----- Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 09/08/2010 11:20 AM

-----

 

 From: "Winkler, Michael" <Michael.Winkler@eon-us.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Date: 09/07/2010 04:50 PM 

 Subject: Effluent Guideline ICR Extension Request 

Ms. Alicea –

E.ON U.S. (parent company of Louisville Gas & Electric Company (LG&E)

and Kentucky Utilities Company (KU)) would like to formally request a 30

day extension (to October 15th) in order to complete the Effluent

Guidelines ICR for the following facilities:

 · LG&E – Mill Creek Station (03604)

 · LG&E – Cane Run Station (00174)

 · LG&E – Trimble County Station (01674)

 · KU – Ghent Station (02601)

 · KU – E.W. Brown Station (03672)

 · KU – Tyrone Station (05237)

 · KU – Green River Station (07311)

This request results from the temporary loss of key staff resources

required for unscheduled ash pond inspections at three generating

facilities as well as a legal challenge to a recently issued NPDES

permit (we are co-defendants with the State of Kentucky). Our intention

had been to complete the questionnaire for the seven facilities listed

above within the original 90 days, thus we did not initially request an

extension during the first 21 days as required in the ICR cover letter.

However, due to these circumstances outside of our control, which

occurred after the 21-day request window, we now find ourselves

potentially unable to complete the questionnaire within the next nine

days.

Over the last six weeks our small environmental department was required

to participate in the above-mentioned EPA ash pond impoundment

inspections at three facilities, necessitating the search and generation

of extensive construction documentation in storage (in some cases more

than 30 years old). In addition, we have been involved with legal

counsel preparing affidavits, interrogatories, data requests and

ultimately being deposed as part of a legal challenge to a recently
issued NPDES permit.

While the data gathering from the facilities has continued on schedule,

my staff and I have not been unable to keep pace with our portion of the

ICR and we are now concerned whether we can meet the September 16th

deadline. Your timely consideration of our 30 day extension request is

greatly appreciated.

Michael Winkler

Manager, Environmental Programs

E.ON U.S.

The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the

person or entity to which it is directly addressed or copied. It may

contain material of confidential and/or private nature. Any review,

retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action

in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the

intended recipient is not allowed. If you received this message and the

information contained therein by error, please contact the sender and

delete the material from your/any storage medium.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D2 3- 1114 LT Case No. 1989
- CF
- 6494

_____________________________ B OBBY L EE J OHNSON , Appellant,
v. S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ 3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Lindsay Tygart, Judge. Bobby Lee Jo hnson, Monticell o, pro se. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, and Daren Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. Septe m ber 26, 2023 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J., L AMBERT , and H ARRIS , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Adrian Gentle, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>In consolidated criminal prosecutions, defendant appeals from two judgments of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Shawn T. Kelly, J.), each rendered August 11, 2015, convicting him, upon his pleas of guilty, of two counts of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgments of conviction (Shawn T. Kelly, J.), each rendered August 11, 2015, affirmed.</p><p>Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders</i>, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: March 14, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### § 1.641 [Reserved]
#### § 1.875-1 Partnerships.

Whether a nonresident alien individual who is a member of a partnership is taxable in accordance with subsection (a), (b), or (c) of section 871 may depend on the status of the partnership. A nonresident alien individual who is a member of a partnership which is not engaged in trade or business within the United States is subject to the provisions of section 871 (a) or (b), as the case may be, depending on whether or not he receives during the taxable year an aggregate of more than $15,400 gross income described in section 871(a), if he is not otherwise engaged in trade or business within the United States. A nonresident alien individual who is a member of a partnership which at any time within the taxable year is engaged in trade or business within the United States is considered as being engaged in trade or business within the United States and is therefore taxable under section 871(c). For definition of what the term “partnership” includes, see section 7701(a)(2) and the regulations in part 301 of this chapter (Regulations on Procedure and Administration). The test of whether a partnership is engaged in trade or business within the United States is the same as in the case of a nonresident alien individual. See § 1.871-8.
#### City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chicago Title & Trust Company, Trustee Under Trust No. 37335 and Deed in Trust, Dated February 1, 1955, Oscar W. Berkson and Unknown Owners, Defendants. Oscar W. Berkson, Marshall Berkson, Sylvia Berkson and Chicago Title and Trust Company, Trustee, Defendants-Appeilees.

Gen. No. 52,495.

First District.

February 24, 1969.

Raymond F. Simon, Corporation Counsel of City of Chicago, of Chicago (Marvin E. Aspen and Edmund Hatfield, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel), for appellant; George C. Rabens, of Chicago (S. Joseph Formusa, of counsel), for appellees.

Opinion by

JUSTICE CRAVEN.

Not to be published in full.
Newmark Knight Frank(logo)

225 Franklin Street

18th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

T 877.526.3562

ngkf.com



Officer’s
Certificate



Pursuant to the requirements of the
applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, for which Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as Master Servicer, and Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, as Sub-Servicer, the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino,
a Senior Managing Director of Servicing and Asset Management of Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank, hereby certifies
subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in
his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Sub-Servicer during the preceding calendar year (or in the case of the first such certification,
during the period from the Closing Date to December 31, 2018) (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under
the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Sub-Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: January 31, 2019



Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a

Newmark Knight Frank



|/s/ Ronald Steffenino          | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Ronald Steffenino              | 
|Senior Managing Director       | 
|Servicing and Asset Management | 



BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Wells Fargo













Newmark Knight Frank(logo)



Schedule I



Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital
LLC d/b/a Newmark Knight Frank as Primary Servicer



|COMM 2014-CCRE20 | COMM 2015-CCRE24
|---------------- | ----------------
|COMM 2015-CCRE26 | GSMS 2015-GC28  
|GSMS 2015-GC34   | COMM 2015-LC23  
|CGCMT 2016-C1    | CFCRE 2016-C3   
|CFCRE 2016-C4    | SGCMS 2016-C5   
|CFCRE 2016-C6    | CFCRE 2017-C8   
|UBS 2017-C4      | UBS 2017-C6     
|UBS 2018 C10     | BBCMS 2018 C2   
|UBS 2018 C14    



BPC d/b/a NKF Primary Servicer for Wells Fargo
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.4175 Aneurysm clip applier. ( a ) *Identification.* An aneurysm clip applier is a device used by the surgeon for holding and applying intracranial aneurysm clips.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
#### Otuni ODANUYI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Augustus SCOTT, Jr., Warden of Lincoln Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-3997.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued June 11, 2002.

Decided June 20, 2002.

Before COFFEY, RIPPLE, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Otuni Odanuyi, a Nigerian national, was convicted in Illinois state court of narcotics trafficking and possession with intent to deliver more than 400 grams of heroin, for which she received a 24-year prison sentence. She appeals from the district court’s denial of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The facts relevant to this appeal are ably set forth by the district court in its October 31, 2001 memorandum opinion and order, which we attach to this order. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court concluded that Ms. Odanuyi’s counsel rendered deficient representation during plea negotiations, at trial, and on appeal. Nevertheless, the district court denied habeas relief because Ms. Odanuyi was not prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance at trial and because she procedurally defaulted her other ineffective assistance claims by failing to present them to the Illinois courts. The district court granted Ms. Odanuyi a certificate of appealability.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38253-38254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18320]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

[Docket No. SSA-2009-0033]


Occupational Information Development Advisory Panel Meeting

AGENCY: Social Security Administration (SSA).

[[Page 38254]]


ACTION: Notice of upcoming panel teleconference meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: August 31, 2009, 12 p.m.-2 p.m. (EDT).
    Call-in number: 1-866-244-4637, Conference ID: 1367805.
    Leader/Host: Debra Tidwell-Peters.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Type of meeting: The teleconference meeting is open to the public.
    Purpose: This discretionary Panel, established under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act of 1972, as amended, shall report to the 
Commissioner of Social Security. The Panel provides independent advice 
and recommendations on plans and activities to replace the Dictionary 
of Occupational Titles used in the Social Security Administration's 
(SSA) disability determination process. The Panel advises the Agency on 
creating an occupational information system tailored specifically for 
SSA's disability programs and adjudicative needs. Advice and 
recommendations will relate to SSA's disability programs in the 
following areas: Medical and vocational analysis of disability claims; 
occupational analysis, including definitions, ratings and capture of 
physical and mental/cognitive demands of work and other occupational 
information critical to SSA disability programs; data collection; use 
of occupational information in SSA's disability programs; and any other 
area(s) that would enable SSA to develop an occupational information 
system suited to its disability programs and improve the medical-
vocational adjudication policies and processes.
    Agenda: We will post the agenda for the meeting on the Internet at 
http://www.ssa.gov/oidap/meeting_information.htm at least one week 
prior to the start date and you can receive it electronically by e-mail 
or by fax, upon request. We will keep records of all proceedings and 
they will be available for public inspection by appointment at the 
Panel office.
    Contact Information: Anyone requiring information regarding the 
Panel should contact the Panel staff by: Mail addressed to the 
Occupational Information Development Advisory Panel, Social Security 
Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Operations Building, 3-E-26, 
Baltimore, MD 21235, fax to (410) 597-0825, or e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a75737e7b6a7a49495b145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="541b1d101504142727357a333b22">[email protected]</span></a>.

Debra Tidwell-Peters,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-18320 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1.6418-0 Table of contents. This section lists the captions contained in §§ 1.6418-1 through 1.6418-5. *§ 1.6418-1 Transfer of eligible credits.* ( a ) Transfer of eligible credits.
( b ) Eligible taxpayer.
( c ) Eligible credit.
( d ) Eligible credit property.
( e ) Guidance.
( f ) Paid in cash.
( g ) Section 6418 regulations.
( h ) Specified credit portion.
( i ) Statutory references.
( j ) Transfer election.
( k ) Transferee partnership.
( l ) Transferee S corporation.
( m ) Transferee taxpayer.
( n ) Transferor partnership.
( o ) Transferor S corporation.
( p ) Transferred specified credit portion.
( q ) U.S. territory.
( r ) Applicability date.
*§ 1.6418-2 Rules for making transfer elections.* ( a ) Transfer election.
( b ) Manner and due date of making a transfer election.
( c ) Limitations after a transfer election is made.
( d ) Determining the eligible credit.
( e ) Treatment of payments made in connection with a transfer election.
( f ) Transferee taxpayer's treatment of eligible credit.
( g ) Applicability date.
*§ 1.6418-3 Additional rules for partnerships and S corporations.* ( a ) Rules applicable to both partnerships and S corporations.
( b ) Rules applicable to partnerships.
( c ) Rules applicable to S corporations.
( d ) Transfer election by a partnership or an S corporation.
( e ) Examples.
( f ) Applicability date.
*§ 1.6418-4 Additional information and registration.* ( a ) Pre-filing registration and election.
( b ) Pre-filing registration requirements.
( c ) Registration number.
( d ) Applicability date.
*§ 1.6418-5 Special rules.* ( a ) Excessive credit transfer tax imposed.
( b ) Excessive credit transfer defined.
( c ) Basis reduction under section 50(c).
( d ) Notification and impact of recapture under section 50(a) or 49(b).
( e ) Notification and impact of recapture under section 45Q(f)(4).
( f ) Notification and impact of recapture under section 48(a)(10)(C).
( g ) Impact of an ineffective transfer election by an eligible taxpayer.
( h ) Carryback and carryforward.
( i ) Rules applicable to real estate investment trusts.
( j ) Applicability date.
[T.D. 9993, 89 FR 34800, Apr. 30, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7977 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7977

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the minimum number of 
participating students required to establish or maintain a unit of the 
                Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2024

Mr. Waltz (for himself, Ms. Houlahan, Mrs. Miller of West Virginia, Mr. 
    Moylan, Ms. Sewell, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Davis of North 
  Carolina, Mr. McCormick, Mr. Palmer, Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia, Mr. 
   Connolly, Mr. Banks, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Gimenez, Mr. Wittman, and Mr. 
   Khanna) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the minimum number of 
participating students required to establish or maintain a unit of the 
                Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving JROTC Programs Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION TO MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARTICIPATING STUDENTS REQUIRED 
              TO ESTABLISH OR MAINTAIN A UNIT OF JROTC.

    Section 2031(b)(1)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``100'' and inserting ``50''.
                                 <all>
```
**UNPUBLISHED**

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 0 9** 
**- 1**  **843**

IRENE VANCE, widow of Jessie Vance ,

P etitioner ,

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS ; CEDAR COAL CORPORATION , Respondent s
.

On Pe tition for Review of an Order of the B enefits Review B oard. (08

- 712

- BLA)

Submitted: February 24, 2010 Decided: March 9 , 2010

Before MICHAEL, KING , and SHEDD , Circuit Judge s
.

Petition d eni ed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irene Vanc e, Petitioner Pro Se

. Steven D. Breeskin, Deputy Commissioner, Rita Ann Roppolo, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C. ; David L. Yaussy, ROBINSON & MCELWEE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia , for Respondents

.

Unpublished opinions are not b inding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Irene Vance seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law
judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.

§§ 901

- 945 (2006). Our review of the rec ord discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is
without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. Vance v. Director,
Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs , No. 08

- 712

- BLA (B.R.B.

June 23, 2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. at June 30, 1998, and its statement of
income for the six months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. for the six months ended
June 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,564,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,066
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      15,398,766
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,543,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,980,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,890,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,980,610
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,664,547
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  198,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,598,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,598,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,598,777
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VIII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shwon above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>