alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPhysics Based Model for Cryogenic Chilldown and Loading. Part IV: Code StructureThis is the fourth report in a series of technical reports that describe separated two-phase flow model application to the cryogenic loading operation. In this report we present the structure of the code. The code consists of five major modules: (1) geometry module; (2) solver; (3) material properties; (4) correlations; and finally (5) stability control module. The two key modules - solver and correlations - are further divided into a number of submodules. Most of the physics and knowledge databases related to the properties of cryogenic two-phase flow are included into the cryogenic correlations module. The functional form of those correlations is not well established and is a subject of extensive research. Multiple parametric forms for various correlations are currently available. Some of them are included into correlations module as will be described in details in a separate technical report. Here we describe the overall structure of the code and focus on the details of the solver and stability control modules.Document ID20150000834Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsLuchinsky, D. G.*(Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. (SGT, Inc.) Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Smelyanskiy, V. N.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Brown, B.*(NASA Kennedy Space Center Cocoa Beach, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 29, 2015Publication DateNovember 1, 2014Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsEngineering (General)Computer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-2014-218399ARC-E-DAA-TN15372Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNA08CG83CCONTRACT_GRANT: NNA14AA60CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordscryogenic fluid managementheat transfertwo-phase flowAvailable DownloadsNameType20150000834.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN ADONAY CHICAS CLAROS,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 71571

Agency No. A206

- 270

- 678

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 26, 20 20 * *

Before: McKEOWN, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Kevin Adonay Chicas Claros, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief u nder the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”)

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §1252. We review for substantial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 3 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 71571

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

-

85 (9th Cir. 2006)

. We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and

we remand.

Chicas Claros’ request to remand and terminate proceedings for lack of

jurisdiction is foreclosed by Aguilar Fermin v. Barr , 958 F.3d 887, 894

- 95 (9th

Cir. 2020) (notice to appear need not include time, date, or place of initial hearing

to vest jurisdiction in the immigration court).

T he agency found that Chicas Claros failed to establish past harm r i s ing to

the level of persecution. Substantial evidence does not support that determination.

See Ruano v. Ashcroft , 301 F.3d 1155, 1160 (9th Cir. 2002) (threats coupled with

close confrontation by armed men rose to the level of persecution) . Thus, we grant

t he petition for review as to Chicas Claros’ asylum and withholding of removal

claims , and remand to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this

disposition. See INS v. Ventura , 537 U.S. 12, 16

- 18 (2002) (per curiam).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because

Chicas Claros failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador

. See

Aden v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).3 19

- 71571

Chicas C laro s ’ removal is stayed pending a decision by the BIA.

The government must bear the costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;

REMANDED.
# C_2014361EN.01001001.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/10

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 20 August 2014 — Gmina Kosakowo v Commission

(Case T-217/14 R)

((Interim proceedings - State aid - Airport infrastructure - Public finance granted by the local authorities to a regional airport - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency))

2014/C 361/12

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gmina Kosakowo (Poland) (represented by: M. Leśny, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan, S. Noë and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to suspend operation of Commission Decision C(2014) 759 final of 11 February 2014 relating to measure S.A,35388 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN and ex 2012/N) — Poland — Conversion of the Gdynia-Kosakowo airport.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 26, 2016

d1017

Order 

Clerk

October 26, 2016

152264 (35)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152264

COA: 325682 

Grand Traverse CC: 

ANTOINE EUGENE GOGINS, 2014-011877-FH

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 29, 

2016 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated March 29, 

2016. On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the July 9, 2015 judgment 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of 

People v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 

152946-8) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases 

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that 

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.4310 Powered simple cranial drills, burrs, trephines, and their accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* Powered simple cranial drills, burrs, trephines, and their accessories are bone cutting and drilling instruments used on a patient's skull. The instruments are used with a power source but do not have a clutch mechanism to disengage the tip after penetrating the skull.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10(ll)    
  


As
of January 3, 2003 


Mr. Steven
S. Elbaum

The Alpine Group, Inc.

One Meadowlands Plaza

East Rutherford, NJ 07073 


Dear
Steven: 



	Re:
	Amendment
to Employment Agreement dated as of April 26, 1996

between The Alpine Group, Inc. ("Alpine" or the "Company"), as

Employer and Steven S. Elbaum, as Executive (as amended to date,

the "Employment Agreement") 




Dear
Steven: 


        This
letter will memorialize the proposal unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting held on January 3, 2002, in amendment of your Employment
Agreement, as follows: 


	1.
	Your
annual base compensation under the Employment Agreement for 2003 will be paid in cash in accordance with the terms thereof until you have received 60% of such aggregate annual
base compensation (the "Cash Portion") payable thereunder. The remaining 40% of such 2003 annual base compensation (the "Deferred Portion") shall not be payable in cash, but shall be paid in common
stock of the Company (the "Common Stock") in the manner described below.



	2.
	Immediately
following the date on which you shall have received the entire Cash Portion (but in no event prior to July 3, 2003), the Company will pay you the Deferred Portion by
crediting your "Deferred Stock Account", as defined in and established under the Alpine Group, Inc. Deferred Stock Account Plan (the "Plan), with the number of shares of Common Stock which is
equal to the (a) the dollar amount of the Deferred Portion divided by (b) the market price of the Common Stock as of the close of business on the date hereof. A fractional share of
Common Stock shall be rounded to the nearest full integer.



	3.
	All
such shares of Common Stock shall be (i) deemed immediately vested, (ii) automatically deferred for a "Deferral Period" (as such term is defined under the Plan) of
five (5) years, and (iii) entitled to earn a "Matching Contribution" (as such term is defined in Plan) from the Company in accordance with the terms of the Plan. 



        If
the foregoing conforms with your understanding of the amendment of your Employment Agreement kindly execute a copy of this letter so indicating. 



	 	 	Very truly yours,
	

 	
 	

THE ALPINE GROUP, INC.
	

 	
 	

By	
 	

 
	
 Steven S. Elbaum	 	 	 	
 Stewart H. Wahrsager

Corporate Secretary











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(ll)
§ 1.6081-11 Automatic extension of time for filing certain employee plan returns. ( a ) *In general.* An administrator or sponsor of an employee benefit plan required to file a return under the provisions of chapter 61 or the regulations under that chapter on Form 5500 (series), “Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan,” will be allowed an automatic extension of time to file the return until the 15th day of the third month following the date prescribed for filing the return if the administrator or sponsor files an application under this section in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Requirements.* To satisfy this paragraph (b), an administrator or sponsor must— ( 1 ) Submit a complete application on Form 5558, “Application for Extension of Time To File Certain Employee Plan Returns,” or in any other manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner; and
( 2 ) File the application with the Internal Revenue Service office designated in the application's instructions on or before the date prescribed for filing the information return.
( c ) *Termination of automatic extension.* The Commissioner may terminate an automatic extension at any time by mailing to the administrator or sponsor a notice of termination at least 10 days prior to the termination date designated in such notice. The Commissioner must mail the notice of termination to the address shown on the Form 5558 or to the administrator or sponsor's last known address. For further guidance regarding the definition of last known address, see § 301.6212-2 of this chapter.
( d ) *Penalties.* See sections 6652, 6692, and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 for penalties for failure to file a timely and complete Form 5500.
( e ) *Effective/applicability dates.* This section is applicable for applications for an automatic extension of time to file Forms 5500 for plan years ending after July 1, 2008.
[T.D. 9407, 73 FR 37368, July 1, 2008]
#### Ethel W. Baird *v.*Gaer Brothers, Inc., et al.

*William P. Asp ell,*in support of the motion.

Submitted May 14

decided May 20, 1964

The motion by the plaintiff to have the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County placed on the June, 1964, term assignment list is denied.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Effects of the March 1964 Alaska earthquake on the hydrology 
of the Anchorage area, Alaska: Chapter B in The Alaska earthquake, March 27, 
1964: effects hydrologic regimen

#### Professional Paper 544-B

###### This report is Chapter B in The Alaska earthquake, March 27, 1964: 
effects on the hydrologic regimen.  For more information, see: Professional Paper 544.

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **USGS 
  Index Page**
- Document: **Document**
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Study Area



#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp544B 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: September 18, 
2013 15:32:43
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7905 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7905

To prohibit States from imposing a tax on the retail sale of menstrual 
                               products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2024

Mr. Green of Texas (for himself, Ms. Meng, Ms. Adams, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. 
Bowman, Mr. Carson, Mr. Casten, Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick, Ms. Chu, Ms. 
 Clarke of New York, Mr. Connolly, Ms. Escobar, Mrs. Foushee, Ms. Lois 
Frankel of Florida, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Grijalva, 
   Ms. Norton, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania, Ms. Lee of 
   California, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Nadler, Mrs. 
    Napolitano, Ms. Pettersen, Ms. Ross, Mr. Ruiz, Ms. Salinas, Ms. 
   Schakowsky, Ms. Sewell, Ms. Tlaib, Mrs. Torres of California, Ms. 
  Wilson of Florida, and Mr. Swalwell) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit States from imposing a tax on the retail sale of menstrual 
                               products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Taxes Against Menstrual 
Products Act of 2024'' or the ``STAMP Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    It shall be unlawful for a State, or unit of local government of a 
State, to impose a tax on the retail sale of a menstrual product.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act:
            (1) Menstrual product.--The term ``menstrual product'' 
        means a sanitary napkin, or tampon, menstrual cups, menstrual 
        discs, period underwear, and that conforms to industry 
        standards.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' means any of the several 
        States or the District of Columbia.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect 120 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device. ( a ) *Identification.* An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.
( b ) *Classification.* ( 1 ) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
( 2 ) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
( c ) *Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required.* Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[72 FR 32172, June 12, 2007]
*An official caption containing a complete list of parties is

on file and available for inspection in the Office of the Clerk of

the Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

_____________

No. 95-3623WA

_____________

Robert A. Miller, et al., *

*

Appellees, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Rev. Joseph Orlando, et al., * [UNPUBLISHED] *

*

Appellants. *

_____________

Submitted: July 5, 1996

 Filed: November 6, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Nineteen would-be intervenors appeal the district court's order

denying as untimely under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 their petition

to intervene in an action involving a 1990 civil judgment against Tony

Alamo. Having carefully reviewed the record and the partes' briefs, we

conclude no error of law appears, and an extended opinion is unwarranted.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation 

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2015-CCRE27 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer'sknowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey Coletta

Jeffrey Coletta

Assistant Secretary

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### Albert J. LaVorgna *v.*Fred Wheeler et al.

*Norman Ebenstein,*in support of the motion.

*William J. Shea, Jr.,*in opposition.

Submitted March 30

decided April 7, 1964

The motion by the plaintiff to perfect the record in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied. See Practice Book, 1963, §§ 675, 695.
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Clipper Realty Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

     1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

     2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date:  | April 26, 2018 | Signed: | /s/ David Bistricer     |
|--------|----------------|---------|-------------------------|
|   |           |    | David Bistricer         |
|   |           |    | Chief Executive Officer |