alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John K. JUDD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-50261.

D.C. No. CR-99-00507-ER-3.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 7, 2002.

Decided June 14, 2002.

Before LAY,* CANBY, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

John Judd was found guilty of securities fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to commit the same offenses. Judd objected to certain evidence presented on the ground of the attorney-client privilege. The district court found the attorney-client privilege was held by KS Resources (“KS”), a corporation, and not by Judd individually.

Judd argues that KS was really an extension of Judd, as an individual. Judd *890asserts the court in *United States v. Munoz,*233 F.3d 1117, 1128 n. 2 (9th Cir.2000), recognized an exception to the rule that an individual cannot assert the attorney-client privilege held by a corporation if “a party reasonably but mistakenly believes that an attorney represents him rather than another party.” Even assuming that we were to recognize such an exception, *cf. id.*(stating that such an exception has been recognized in “limited circumstances” in two other circuits but holding “we decline to do so in this case”), Judd cannot satisfy the exception. Judd did not have a reasonable belief that the attorney was representing him in his individual capacity because KS, not Judd individually, paid for the legal services provided, *see id.*at 1128; the nature of the advice sought related to corporate business, *see United States v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters,*119 F.3d 210, 216-17 (2d Cir.1997); there was never a private arrangement between Judd and the attorney; and the attorney made it unmistakably clear that he represented the corporation and not Judd individually. *See Munoz,*233 F.3d at 1128.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 39106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,039]


Umicore Autocat USA, Inc., Catoosa, OK; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on June 26, 2009, applicable to workers of Umicore Autocat USA, Inc., 
Catoosa, Oklahoma. The notice will soon be published in the Federal 
Register.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of catalysts for automotive emission control systems.
    The review shows that on May 7, 2007, a certification of 
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance was issued for all 
workers of ASEC Manufacturing, a subsidiary of Delphi Corporation, 
Catoosa, Oklahoma, separated from employment on or after January 22, 
2006 through May 7, 2009. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on May 24, 2007 (72 FR 29182). The certification was amended 
on September 25, 2007, to reflect that Umicore Autocat USA, Inc. was 
the new owner of the firm. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on October 3, 2007 (72 FR 56388).
    In order to avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, the 
Department is amending the May 18, 2008 impact date established for TA-
W-70,039, to read May 8, 2009.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,039 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Umicore Autocat USA, Inc., Catoosa, Oklahoma, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
May 8, 2009, through June 26, 2011, and all workers in the group 
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date 
of certification through two years from the date of certification, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of July 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18651 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
§ 1.1402(a)-9 Puerto Rico. ( a ) *Residents.* A resident of Puerto Rico, whether or not a bona fide resident thereof during the entire taxable year, and whether or not an alien, a citizen of the United States, or a citizen of Puerto Rico, shall compute his net earnings from self-employment in the same manner as would a citizen of the United States residing in the United States. See paragraph (d) of § 1.1402(b)-1 for regulations relating to nonresident aliens. For the purpose of the tax on self-employment income, the gross income of such a resident of Puerto Rico also includes income from Puerto Rican sources. Thus, under this special rule, income from Puerto Rican sources will be included in determining net earnings from self-employment of a resident of Puerto Rico engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business in Puerto Rico despite the fact that, under section 933, such income may not be taken into account for purposes of the tax under section 1 or 3.
( b ) *Nonresidents.* A citizen of Puerto Rico who is also a citizen of the United States and who is not a resident of Puerto Rico will compute his net earnings from self-employment in the same manner and subject to the same provisions of law and regulations as other citizens of the United States.
# Gazzetta ufficiale L 272/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0707 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | L 272 |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Legislazione | 63° anno19 agosto 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0707

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

L 272

Edizione in lingua italiana

Legislazione

63° anno19 agosto 2020

---

| Sommario | | Rettifiche | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Rettifica dell’adozione definitiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 del bilancio rettificativo n. 4 dell'Unione europea per l'esercizio 2020 ( GU L 254 del 4.8.2020 ) | 1 |

Sommario

Rettifiche

pagina

*

Rettifica dell’adozione definitiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 del bilancio rettificativo n. 4 dell'Unione europea per l'esercizio 2020 ( GU L 254 del 4.8.2020 )

( GU L 254 del 4.8.2020 )

1

| IT | Gli atti i cui titoli sono stampati in caratteri chiari appartengono alla gestione corrente. Essi sono adottati nel quadro della politica agricola ed hanno generalmente una durata di validità limitata.
  I titoli degli altri atti sono stampati in grassetto e preceduti da un asterisco. |
| --- | --- |

IT

Gli atti i cui titoli sono stampati in caratteri chiari appartengono alla gestione corrente. Essi sono adottati nel quadro della politica agricola ed hanno generalmente una durata di validità limitata.

I titoli degli altri atti sono stampati in grassetto e preceduti da un asterisco.

---

Rettifiche

| 19.8.2020 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | L 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2020

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

L 272/1

---

Rettifica dell’adozione definitiva (UE, Euratom) 2020/1078 del bilancio rettificativo n. 4 dell'Unione europea per l'esercizio 2020

(
  Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea L 254 del 4 agosto 2020
  )

Pagina 36, riga «Totale», colonna «Bilancio 2020 — Pagamenti»:

anziché:

«
  167 248 223 575
  »,

leggasi:

«
  150 948 403 832
  ».

Pagina 36, riga «Totale», colonna «Nuovo importo — Pagamenti»:

anziché:

«
  167 520 721 783
  »,

leggasi:

«
  151 220 902 040
  ».

---
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 225

Relating to the purchase of calendars.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. FORD, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

JUNE 21 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to the purchase of calendars.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration is authorized to expend from the contingent fund

3 of the Senate, upon vouchers approved by the chairman

4 of that committee, not to exceed $79,040 for the purchase

5 of one hundred and four thousand 1995 ‘‘We The People’’

6 calendars. The calendars shall be distributed as prescribed

7 by the committee.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 243 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 243

 Recognizing the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute on the occasion of 
                         its 50th Anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 14 (legislative day, July 11), 1994

  Mr. Lott (for himself, Mr. Stevens, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Johnston, Mr. 
 Cochran, Mr. Helms, Mr. Heflin, Mr. Simon, and Mr. Simpson) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute on the occasion of 
                         its 50th Anniversary.

Whereas, in 1944, the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute was founded by 20 land 
        specialists who met at the Drake Hotel in Chicago, Illinois, to 
        establish a national organization that would provide education, 
        information, marketing opportunities, and broker networking to enhance 
        the ability of their members to conduct business as recognized 
        professional land use specialists and, through collective action, 
        preserve private property rights;
Whereas the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute has been an affiliate of the 
        National Association of REALTORS<Register> for 50 years;
Whereas, in 1994, the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute celebrates 50 years of 
        serving land owners, users, and realtors throughout the United States 
        and Canada;
Whereas the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute members have developed 
        international marketing capabilities and networks throughout the world;
Whereas the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute is comprised of members who 
        subscribe to a strict code of ethics and to just and equitable 
        principles in real estate transactions;
Whereas the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute encourages continuing education 
        and rewards members who complete an extensive education program and 
        service to the land industry with a national designation of Accredited 
        Land Consultant (ALC); and
Whereas the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute is a national professional trade 
        association, dedicated to advancing the effective use of our most 
        precious commodity, land: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the REALTORS<Register> Land 
Institute on the occasion of its 50th Anniversary.
    Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to the REALTORS<Register> Land Institute.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.13





OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE



I,
Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage
Securities Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer,
Situs Holdings, LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the “Certificate Administrator”),
and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following:



1.          A
review of the Company’s activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2015 and
its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.



2.          To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.



This statement is
given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity.



Date:	February
26, 2016



| |                |                   
| | -------------- | ------------------
| | Citibank, N.A.
| |                |                   
| | By:            | /s/ Karen Montbach
| | Name:          | Karen Montbach    
| | Title:         | Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 84 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 84

  To make a technical correction with respect to the Albert Einstein 
                   Congressional Fellowship Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 30, (legislative day, March 3), 1993

  Mr. Hatfield (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To make a technical correction with respect to the Albert Einstein 
                   Congressional Fellowship Program.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

    Senate Resolution 239 of the One Hundred Second Congress (agreed to 
on November 27, 1991) is amended in section 4(e)(2) by striking ``at 
not to'' and all that follows through ``6(a)''.

                                 <all>
```
#### Linko et vir v. Devine

Before Hoban, P. J., Eagen and Robinson, JJ.

*Myron A. Pinkus,*for plaintiffs.

*Harry A. Kolb,*for defendant.

February 15, 1952.

Hoban, P. J.,

Plaintiffs claimed damages for personal injuries caused by the collapse of a defective chair in a restaurant owned and operated by defendant. In the preliminary objections defendant says there is no jurisdiction over him because he was not the owner nor operator; that one Beatrice Mildred Devine was the owner and operator and should have been joined as an indispensable party.

These objections simply state a denial of averments as to identity of the person by whom the material act was committed and the ownership and control of the instrumentality involved, which if not denied by a responsive pleading will be taken to be admitted: Pa. R. C. P. 1045(b). Preliminary objections do not constitute a “responsive” pleading. The complaint calls for an answer.

Now, February 15, 1952, the preliminary objections are dismissed, defendant to plead over in 20 days.
### Supporting Materials #4 Documents that Support use of Certain Control Technologies or Inventory Development See Attachment: GRIC AQMP
§ 1.468A-9 Applicability dates. ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, §§ 1.468A-1 through 1.468A-8 are effective on December 23, 2010, and apply with respect to taxable years ending after such date.
( b ) *Special rules* — ( 1 ) *Taxable years ending before December 23, 2010.* Special rules that are provided for taxable years ending on or before December 23, 2010, such as the special rule for certain special transfers contained in § 1.468A-8(a)(4)(ii), apply with respect to such taxable years. In addition, except as provided in paragraph (2) of this section, a taxpayer may apply the provisions of §§ 1.468A-1 through 1.468A-8 with respect to a taxable year ending on or before December 23, 2010, if all such provisions are consistently applied.
( 2 ) *Applicability of § 1.468A-1(b)(6) and § 1.468A-5(b)(2)(i) , (b)(2)(v) , and (d)(3)(i) .* The rules in §§ 1.468A-1(b)(6) and 1.468A-5(b)(2)(i), (b)(2)(v), and (d)(3)(i) apply to taxable years ending on or after September 4, 2020. Taxpayers may also choose to apply the rules in § 1.468A-1(b)(6) and § 1.468A-5(b)(2)(i), (b)(2)(v), and (d)(3)(i) to prior taxable years for which a taxpayer's deemed payment deadline (as defined in § 1.468A-2(c)(1)) has not passed prior to September 4, 2020.
[T.D. 9906, 85 FR 55190, Sept. 4, 2020]
(logo) ncb

National Cooperative Bank

 

2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202

 

February 29, 2016

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance WFCM 2015 NXS3

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS3, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a. A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b. To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31, 2016.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
Exhibit
10.1


 


	
  Named Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  2006 Base Salary

  	
   

  	
  2006 Bonus

  	
   

  
	
  Henri A. Termeer

  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,433,250

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,725,500

  	
   

  
	
  Earl M. Collier, Jr.

  Executive Vice President

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  515,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  433,125

  	
   

  
	
  Georges Gemayel

  Executive Vice President

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  468,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  438,125

  	
   

  
	
  Peter Wirth

  Executive Vice President; Chief Legal Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  676,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  433,125

  	
   

  
	
  Michael S. Wyzga

  Executive Vice President; Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  468,000

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  433,125
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robin Raina, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ebix, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | August 12, 2005         | /s/ Robin Raina |   |
|--------|-------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|   | Robin Raina             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
## NO. 12

- 09

- 00316

- C R

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

REBECCA LOUISE MOORE, ' APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by

Appellant and her counsel. No decision having been delivered by this court, the motion

is granted, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.2.

Opinion delivered October 21 , 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George ROWLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-10098.

D.C. No. CR-00-40123 CW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*305Submitted June 10, 2002.*

Decided June 13, 2002.

Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

George Rowland appeals his guilty plea conviction for one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Rowland contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause in light of *United States v. Lopez,*514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), *United States v. Morrison,*529 U.S. 598, 120 S.Ct. 1740, 146 L.Ed.2d 658 (2000) and *Jones v. United States,*529 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 1904, 146 L.Ed.2d 902 (2000). We have repeatedly rejected this contention, *see United States v. Jones,*231 *F.3d*508, 513-15 (9th Cir. 2000), *United States v. Davis,*242 F.3d 1162, 1162-63 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), *cert. denied,*—U.S.—, 122 S.Ct. 178, 151 L.Ed.2d 123 (2001), *and United States v. Rousseau,*257 F.3d 925, 932-33 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*—U.S.—, 122 S.Ct. 503, 151 L.Ed.2d 413 (2001), and do so here. *See United States v. Carrasco,*257 F.3d 1045, 1053 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*—U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 658, 151 L.Ed.2d 574 (2001).1

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Rowland’s request for an initial hearing en banc is denied. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(a).