Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Notices 38261 

however, it will become accessible for 

public review at a future date. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning 

and Construction. The regulations 

implementing Executive Order 12372 

regarding intergovernmental consultation on 

federal programs and activities apply to this 

program.) 

Issued on: July 27, 2009. 

Salvador Deocampo, 

District Engineer. 

[FR Doc. E9–18292 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0113; Notice 1] 

Auto Temp, Inc., Receipt of Petition for 

Decision of Inconsequential 

Noncompliance 

Auto Temp, Inc. (Auto Temp) has 

determined that certain replacement 

backlights (part number FB22692 GTY 

ATI), manufactured for 2006–09 Honda 

Civic 2–Door Coupe passenger cars, do 

not fully comply with paragraph S5.2 of 

49 CFR 571.205, Federal Motor Vehicle 

Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 205 

Glazing Materials. Auto Temp has filed 

an appropriate report pursuant to 49 

CFR part 573, Defect and 

Noncompliance Responsibility and 

Reports. 

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49 

CFR part 556), Auto Temp has 

petitioned for an exemption from the 

notification and remedy requirements of 

49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that 

this noncompliance is inconsequential 

to motor vehicle safety. 

This notice of receipt of Auto Temp’s 

petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 

30118 and 30120 and does not represent 

any agency decision or other exercise of 

judgment concerning the merits of the 

petition. 

Auto Temp estimated that 68 

replacement backlights manufactured 

on July 14, 2008, intended for 2006–09 

Honda Civic 2–Door coupe passenger 

cars, are involved and that 80% of those 

backlights may be noncompliant. 

Paragraphs S5.2 of FMVSS No. 108 

require in pertinent part: 

S5.2 Each of the test specimens described 

in ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996 Section 5.7 

(fracture test) must meet the fracture test 

requirements of that section when tested in 

accordance with the test procedure set forth 

in that section. 

5.7.4 Interpretation of Results. NO 

individual fragment free from cracks and 

obtained within 3 minutes subsequent to test 

shall weight more than 4.25g (0.15oz). 

Auto Temp explained that the 

noncompliance is that the subject 

backlights do not meet the fracture test 

requirements of FMVSS No. 205 Section 

5.7 Fracture Test 7 ANSI/SAE Z26.1– 

1996, because several tests revealed that 

out of 8 tested backlights, 6 contained 

fragments that exceeded the 4.25g 

(0.15oz) threshold specified by the 

above standard. 

Auto Temp states that it believes that 

this noncompliance is inconsequential 

to motor vehicle safety for the following 

reasons. Out of several thousand total 

fragments no more than 2 noncompliant 

fragments were found from a single 

backlight. Each of the noncompliant 

fragments exhibited all of the 

characteristics of tempered safety glass. 

The position of the noncompliant 

fragments in the backlight, coupled with 

the package tray location of the Honda 

Civic 2–Door Coupe, minimizes the 

potential for any contact between glass 

fragments and vehicle occupants. The 

extremely low percentage of 

noncompliant fragments, together with 

the small number of total affected 

backlights, results in a minimal impact 

on issue of motor vehicle safety. 

Auto Temp also has informed NHTSA 

that since it has petitioned for an 

exemption from the notification and 

remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. 

Chapter 301 on the basis that this 

noncompliance is inconsequential to 

motor vehicle safety it has not yet 

formulated a remedy for the 

noncompliance. However, Auto Temp 

has agreed to reimburse its customers 

for all returned parts (FB22692 GTY ATI 

backlights produces on July 14, 2008) 

regardless of the filing of an 

inconsequential petition. 

Auto Temp also informed NHTSA 

that it has corrected the problem that 

caused this noncompliance. 

In summation, Auto Temp states that 

it believes that the noncompliances are 

inconsequential to motor vehicle safety 

and that no corrective action is 

warranted. 

NHTSA notes that the statutory 

provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to 

file petitions for a determination of 

inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to 

exempt manufacturers only from the 

duties found in sections 30118 and 

30120, respectively, to notify owners, 

purchasers, and dealers of a defect or 

noncompliance and to remedy the 

defect or noncompliance. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments on this petition. Comments 

must refer to the docket and notice 

number cited at the beginning of this 

notice and be submitted by any of the 

following methods: 

a. By mail addressed to: U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

b. By hand delivery to U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. The Docket Section is open 

on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

except Federal Holidays. 

c. Electronically: by logging onto the 

Federal Docket Management System 

(FDMS) Web site at http:// 

www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Comments may also be faxed to 1–202– 

493–2251. 

Comments must be written in the 

English language, and be no greater than 

15 pages in length, although there is no 

limit to the length of necessary 

attachments to the comments. If 

comments are submitted in hard copy 

form, please ensure that two copies are 

provided. If you wish to receive 

confirmation that your comments were 

received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments. 

Note that all comments received will be 

posted without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. 

Anyone is able to search the 

electronic form of all comments 

received into any of our dockets by the 

name of the individual submitting the 

comment (or signing the comment, if 

submitted on behalf of an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s 

complete Privacy Act Statement in the 

Federal Register published on April 11, 

2000 (65 FR 19477–78). 

You may view documents submitted 

to a docket at the address and times 

given above. You may also view the 

documents on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov by following the 

online instructions for accessing the 

dockets available at that Web site. 

The petition, supporting materials, 

and all comments received before the 

close of business on the closing date 

indicated below will be filed and will be 

considered. All comments and 

supporting materials received after the 

closing date will also be filed and will 

be considered to the extent possible. 

When the petition is granted or denied, 

notice of the decision will be published 

in the Federal Register pursuant to the 

authority indicated below. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
38262 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 146 / Friday, July 31, 2009 / Notices 

Comment closing date: August 31, 

2009. 

Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: 

delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and 

501.8). 

Issued on: July 27, 2009. 

Claude H. Harris, 

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. 

[FR Doc. E9–18253 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements 

Filed the Week Ending July 18, 2009 

The following Agreements were filed 

with the Department of Transportation 

under the sections 412 and 414 of the 

Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 

U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures 

governing proceedings to enforce these 

provisions. Answers may be filed within 

21 days after the filing of the 

application. 

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2009– 

0164. 

Date Filed: July 17, 2009. 

Parties: Members of the International 

Air Transport Association. 

Subject: PTC COMP Mail Vote 604. 

Resolution 010d. 

Establishing Passenger Fares and 

Related Charges from Nepal (Memo 

1535). 

Intended effective date: 1 August 

2009. 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. E9–18293 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request for Form 8082 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is 

soliciting comments concerning Form 

8082, Notice of Inconsistent Treatment 

or Administrative Adjustment Request 

(AAR). 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before September 29, 

2009 to be assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to R. Joseph Durbala, Internal Revenue 

Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the form and instructions 

should be directed to Dawn Bidne, at 

(202) 622–3933, or at Internal Revenue 

Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, 

or through the Internet at 

Dawn.E.Bidne@irs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Notice of Inconsistent 

Treatment or Administrative 

Adjustment Request (AAR). 

OMB Number: 1545–0790. 

Form Number: 8082. 

Abstract: A partner, S corporation 

shareholder, or the holder of a residual 

interest in a real estate mortgage 

investment conduit (REMIC) generally 

must report items consistent with the 

way they were reported by the 

partnership or S corporation on 

Schedule K–1 or by the REMIC on 

Schedule Q. Also, an estate or domestic 

trust beneficiary, or a foreign trust 

owner or beneficiary, is subject to the 

consistency reporting requirements for 

returns filed after August 5, 1997. Form 

8082 is used to notify the IRS of any 

inconsistency between the tax treatment 

of items reported by the partner, 

shareholder, etc., and the way the passthrough entity treated and reported the 

same item on its tax return. 

Current Actions: There are no changes 

being made to the form at this time. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations, individuals, and 

farms. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

7,067. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 7 hr., 

13 min. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 51,024. 

The following paragraph applies to all 

of the collections of information covered 

by this notice: 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless the collection of information 

displays a valid OMB control number. 

Books or records relating to a collection 

of information must be retained as long 

as their contents may become material 

in the administration of any internal 

revenue law. Generally, tax returns and 

tax return information are confidential, 

as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. 

Request for Comments: Comments 

submitted in response to this notice will 

be summarized and/or included in the 

request for OMB approval. All 

comments will become a matter of 

public record. Comments are invited on: 

(a) Whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the collection of 

information; (c) ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on respondents, including 

through the use of automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology; and (e) estimates of capital 

or start-up costs and costs of operation, 

maintenance, and purchase of services 

to provide information. 

Approved: July 22, 2009. 

Allan Hopkins, 

IRS Reports Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–18256 Filed 7–30–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

[OMB Control No. 2900—New (Call Center)] 

Proposed Information Collection (Call 

Center Satisfaction Survey): Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits 

Administration, Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Veterans Benefits 

Administration (VBA), Department of 

Veterans Affairs (VA), is announcing an 

opportunity for public comment on the 

proposed collection of certain 

information by the agency. Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 

1995, Federal agencies are required to 

publish notice in the Federal Register 

concerning each proposed collection of 

information, including each new 

collection, and allow 60 days for public 

comment in response to the notice. This 

notice solicits comments for information 

needed from Veterans regarding their 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES