alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exh. 10.4 TRUSTEE COMPENSATION


Exhibit 10.4




Following is a summary of the compensation arrangement between Northeast Utilities and the members of its Board of Trustees.




Each Trustee who is not an employee of Northeast Utilities or its subsidiaries receives an annual retainer. The Lead Trustee and the Chairs of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Finance Committees receive additional annual retainers specified below. All retainers are payable quarterly. One-half of the value of the retainers to the Chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committees is payable in the form of Northeast Utilities common shares. The following table sets forth the amounts of non-employee Trustee retainers for 2006:







		
	Retainer

	Annual Amount


	Annual Retainer (all Trustees)

	$45,000


	Lead Trustee

	$50,000


	Audit Committee Chair

	$20,000


	Compensation Committee Chair

	$15,000


	Corporate Responsibility Committee Chair

	$7,500


	Corporate Governance Committee Chair

	$7,500


	Finance Committee Chair

	$10,000










In addition to the retainers, each non-employee Trustee receives $1,500 for each meeting of the full Board attended, in person or by conference telephone, during the year and $1,250 for each Committee meeting attended through March 7, 2006.  Subsequent to March 7, 2006, the rate for attendance at Committee meetings by each non-employee Trustee increased to $1,500.




Trustees participate in the Northeast Utilities Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”), under which each non-employee Trustee is eligible for share-based grants each calendar year. Effective in 2007, subject to any voluntary deferral election, each Trustee will receive common shares upon vesting of the grants one year after the date of grant




A non-employee Trustee who is asked by either the Board or the Chairman of the Board to perform additional Board-related services in the interest of the Northeast Utilities System will receive additional compensation of $750 per half-day plus necessary expenses. In addition, when the spouses of Trustees are invited to attend functions of the Board, the Company pays for the travel-related expenses of the spouses that attend such functions. The payment of a Trustee’s spousal expenses is considered imputed income to the individual Trustee, and the Company makes a gross-up payment to each such Trustee to cover the tax liability for the imputed income associated with such spousal expenses.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 186

To authorize testimony by and representation of Senate employees.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 8 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. HOLLINGS (for Mr. MITCHELL) (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony by and representation of Senate

employees.

Whereas, in the case of Haywood Galbreath v. Associated

Press, Case No. CV 933132, pending in the United

States District Court for the Central District of California, the defendant Associated Press seeks the testimony

of Maurice Johnson, an employee of the Senate who is

the Superintendent of the Press Photographers’ Gallery

of the Senate;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
2

SRES 186 ATS

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and

288c(a)(2) (1988), the Senate may direct its counsel to

represent committees, Members, officers and employees

of the Senate with respect to testimony and documents

provided in their official capacity: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Maurice Johnson, and any other em2 ployee of the Senate from whom testimony or the produc3 tion of documents is required, are authorized to testify and

4 to produce documents in the case of Haywood Galbreath

5 v. Associated Press, except concerning matters for which

6 a privilege should be asserted.

7 SEC. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

8 to represent Maurice Johnson, and any other employee of

9 the Senate whose testimony is required, in connection with

10 the testimony and production of documents authorized

11 under section 1.

Æ
Order entered January 9, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00961-CR

EX PARTE SHANIAYA JARVIS

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 111585-86

ORDER

Appellant is appealing the trial court’s order denying relief on her pretrial 

application for writ of habeas corpus seeking a reduction in her bond. Appellant’s 

brief was due on November 2, 2022. On November 4, 2022, after appellant failed 

to file a timely brief, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the time for 

filing appellant’s brief had expired and directed appellant to file the brief and an 

extension motion within ten days.

On November 8, 2022, appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw the

appeal signed only by counsel. By order entered November 15, 2022, the Court 

denied the motion to dismiss for noncompliance with rule 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP.
–2–

P. 42.2(a) (requiring both counsel and the appellant to sign a motion to dismiss an 

appeal). The Court ordered appellant to file an amended motion to dismiss, signed 

by both counsel and appellant, within fourteen days of the date of the order. To 

date, appellant has neither filed an amended motion nor communicated with the 

Court.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the status of 

this appeal. The trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations 

and determine whether subsequent developments in the case have rendered the 

appeal moot, whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether 

retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial 

court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct 

the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–

Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which 

shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order.
–3–

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above 

order. The appeal shall be reinstated when the findings are received or at such 

other time as the Court deems appropriate.

We DIRECT the Clerk to transmit a copy of this order to the Honorable 

Casey Blair, Presiding Judge, 86th Judicial District Court; and to counsel for the 

parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 145 (Thursday, July 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38063-38064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18237]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11818 and <greek-i>11819]


Pennsylvania Disaster <greek-i>PA-00024

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the Commonwealth of PENNSYLVANIA dated 07/21/2009.
    Incident: Apartment Building Fire.
    Incident Period: 07/08/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 07/21/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/21/2009.

[[Page 38064]]

    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/21/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: York.
Contiguous Counties:
    Pennsylvania: Adams, Cumberland, Dauphin, Lancaster.
    Maryland: Baltimore, Carroll, Harford.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      4.875
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.437
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11818 5 
and for economic injury is 11819 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
Pennsylvania, Maryland.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: July 21, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-18237 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.26


                                  Leonard Osser
                               110 E. 71st Street
                               New York, NY 10021


                                 April 15, 2003


Milestone Scientific Inc.
220 South Orange Avenue
Livingston, NJ 07039
Attn: Thomas Stuckey-Chief Financial Officer

         RE:   Milestone Scientific Inc.
               Deferral of Payment of $32,000

Dear Sirs:

      Please be advised that I hereby agree to defer until January 2, 2005 the
payment of principal and any interest on a $32,000 loan I have made to Milestone
Scientific Inc. in January 2003.

                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     /s/Leonard Osser
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Leonard Osser
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41068

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO BANEGAS-VALDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-184-ALL

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Banegas-Valdez (Banegas) appeals the 33-month sentence

imposed after he pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry

into the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Banegas contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional

and that this court should vacate his sentence and remand his

case for resentencing to no more than two years in prison under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). As he concedes, this contention is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998). 
No. 04-41068

-2-

Banegas also contends that he is entitled to resentencing

because the district court sentenced him under a mandatory

application of the federal sentencing guidelines contrary to the

rule of United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738, 756-57, 769

(2005). We review for plain error. See United States v.

Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir. 2005), petition

for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). Although there

was an error, Banegas has failed to demonstrate a sufficient

probability “that the district judge would have imposed a

different sentence” under advisory guidelines. See id. at 733;

United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 502, 521-22 (5th Cir.

2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). 

Banegas thus fails to show that the error affected his

substantial rights as he must do to meet the plain-error

standard. See Mares, 402 F.3d at 521-22. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 4, 2017

s0327

Order 

Clerk

April 4, 2017

153881

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153881

COA: 330568

Wayne CC: 86-008310-FC

DONALD WATKINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 31, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7987 

To require plain language and the inclusion of key words in covered notices 

that are clear, concise, and accessible to small business concerns, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2024 

Mr. LALOTA (for himself and Mr. THANEDAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To require plain language and the inclusion of key words 

in covered notices that are clear, concise, and accessible 

to small business concerns, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Plain Language in 

5 Contracting Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCESSIBILITY AND CLARITY IN COVERED NOTICES 

7 FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Each covered notice shall be writ9 ten— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7987 IH

1 (1) in a manner that is clear, concise, and ac2 cessible to a small business concern; and 

3 (2) in a manner consistent, to the extent prac4 ticable, with the Federal plain language guidelines 

5 established pursuant to the Plain Writing Act of 

6 2010 (5 U.S.C. 301 note). 

7 (b) INCLUSION OF KEY WORDS IN COVERED NO8 TICES.—Each covered notice shall, to the maximum extent 

9 practicable, include key words in the description of the 

10 covered notice such that a small business concern seeking 

11 contract opportunities using the single governmentwide 

12 point of entry described under section 1708 of title 41, 

13 United States Code, can easily identify and understand 

14 such covered notice. 

15 (c) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 90 days after the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

17 the Small Business Administration shall issue rules to 

18 carry out this section. 

19 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

20 (1) COVERED NOTICE.—The term ‘‘covered no21 tice’’ means a notice pertaining to small business 

22 concerns published by a Federal agency on the sin23 gle Government-wide point of entry described under 

24 section 1708 of title 41, United States Code. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7987 IH

1 (2) SMALL BUSINESS ACT DEFINITIONS.—The 

2 terms ‘‘Federal agency’’ and ‘‘small business con3 cern’’ have the meanings given those terms, respec4 tively, in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

5 U.S.C. 632). 

6 SEC. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO. 

7 No additional amounts are authorized to be appro8 priated to carry out this Act or the amendments made 

9 by this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Matthew N. FRASER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BETHEL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 403, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 83-3987, 83-4142.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 7, 1984.

Decided Sept. 19, 1986.

Jeffrey T. Haley, Simburg, Ketter, Haley, Sheppard & Purdy, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellees.

William A. Coats, Clifford Foster, Jr., Kane, Vandeberg, Hartinger & Walker, Tacoma, Wash., for defendants-appellants.

Before WRIGHT, GOODWIN, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The judgment of this court, 755 F.2d 1356, is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in *Bethel School District No. 403, et al. v. Fraser,*— U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3159, 92 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. at March 31, 1998, and its statement of
income for the three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. for the three months
ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         846,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,471
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      17,552,433
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,245,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,423,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,479,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,423,834
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               650,509
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                606,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            606,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   606,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I, Michael Dinkins, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(b) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                                      |  |                        
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /S/    MICHAEL
DINKINS                                               |  | Date:    August 2, 2006
|    |  | Michael Dinkins Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |
IV

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 133

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1996

Mr. BOEHNER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the cal3 endar day of Tuesday, January 9, 1996, it stand ad4 journed until 2 p.m. on Monday, January 22, 1996, or

5 until noon on the second day after Members are notified

6 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res7 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

8 recesses or adjourns on the calendar day of Wednesday,

9 January 10, 1996, pursuant to a motion offered by the

10 Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or ad11 journed until noon on Monday, January 22, 1996, or until

12 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas-
2

HCON 133 ATH

1 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

2 whichever occurs first.

3 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

4 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

5 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead6 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

7 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

8 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ