alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8148 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8148

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow for the 
             furnishing of audio-only telehealth services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2024

    Mr. Feenstra (for himself and Mr. Nunn of Iowa) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow for the 
             furnishing of audio-only telehealth services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Audio-Only Telehealth Access Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING FOR THE FURNISHING OF AUDIO-ONLY TELEHEALTH SERVICES.

    Section 1834(m)(9) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(m)(9)) is amended in the first sentence to read as follows: ``The 
Secretary shall provide coverage and payment under this part for 
telehealth services identified in paragraph (4)(F)(i) as of the date of 
the enactment of this paragraph that are furnished via an audio-only 
communications system on or after the first day of the emergency period 
described in section 1135(g)(1)(B).''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                           MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION
                       OTHER COMPENSATION AGREEMENTS WITH
                        EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

     The following agreements, which are not evidenced by any formal
instruments, have been entered into with the MGIC Investment Corporation (the
"Company") by the persons referred to below.

Agreements Relating to Compensation of Senior Management

     On January 24, 2007, the Management Development, Nominating and Governance
Committee (the "Committee") of the Company's Board of Directors approved the
following new base salaries for the following executive officers: Curt S.
Culver, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer -- $830,000; Patrick Sinks,
President and Chief Operating Officer -- $485,000; J. Michael Lauer, Chief
Financial Officer -- $426,000; Lawrence J. Pierzchalski, Executive Vice
President - Risk Management of Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation, the
Company's principal subsidiary -- $416,000; and Jeffrey H. Lane, General Counsel
-- $353,000. The new base salaries are effective April 2, 2007.

     The Committee also approved cash bonuses for these officers based on
performance for the year ended December 31, 2006 as follows: Mr. Culver --
$1,280,649; Mr. Sinks -- $558,334; Mr. Lauer -- $492,254; Mr. Pierzchalski --
$480,290; and Mr. Lane -- $408,259. These executive officers will participate in
the Company's bonus framework for 2007, which is the same as the bonus framework
for 2006 filed as Exhibit 1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
May 17, 2005.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1997
SECOND QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              87
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      255
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (27)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,399
<PP&E>                                           3,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,861)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,497
<COMMON>                                        50,762
<OTHER-SE>                                    (57,462)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,055
<SALES>                                            438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   438
<CGS>                                            1,617   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,507
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,861)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,861)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,861)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.20


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO EQUITY RESIDENTIAL


1993 SHARE OPTION AND SHARE
AWARD PLAN


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (the “Second Amendment”) to
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL 1993 SHARE OPTION AND SHARE AWARD PLAN is executed as of the
1st day of October, 2006.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of Equity Residential
(the “Company”) adopted the 1993 Share Option and Share Award Plan on May 21,
1993.


 


WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the 1993
Share Option and Share Award Plan effective as of February 21, 2002 (as
amended and restated, the “Plan”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company entered into a First Amendment
to the Plan dated as of June 10, 2003.


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the
Plan pursuant to this Second Amendment to make a minor modification to ensure
compliance with current stock option accounting rules.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is further amended as
follows:


 


1.                                       AMENDMENTS. The first
sentence of Section 13 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the word “may”
in the seventh line thereof and replacing it with the word “shall”.


 


2.                                       PLAN IN FULL
FORCE AND EFFECT. After giving effect to this Second Amendment, the
Plan remains in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment has been
executed as of the date first written above.


 


 


	
   

  	
  EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Bruce C. Strohm

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Bruce C. Strohm

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Executive Vice President and General Counsel
(logo) LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

**OF**

** **

**LNR PARTNERS, LLC**

** **

** **

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), asspecial servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement, herebycertifies, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely inhis capacity as an officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individualcapacity, as follows:

 

1. I have reviewed theactivities performed by the Special Servicer under the applicable Pooling andServicing Agreement during the period commencing on January 1, 2016 and endingon December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"), and the Special Servicer'sperformance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under mysupervision;

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteriaunder Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled itsobligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period

 

 

LNR Partners, LLC, 

A Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 22, 2017

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue ∙Suite700 ∙ Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 ∙Fax: (305)695-5601
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Gary M. DeLaurentiis,  certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Itec Environmental
Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 18, 2003.

/s/  Gary M. De Laurentiis
--------------------------
Gary M. De Laurentiis
Chief Executive Officer
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: October 18, 2016


### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## OEPARTMRETNJriO[N wASHINGTON DC 

## TRANSPO M 

### ' 

## lOib OCT l8 P 3: 20 nncKET OPERAflONS DocketNo. FM-2014-1116 Pacific International Skydiving Center ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2014WP130012 Respondent



### ORDER SETTING PREHEARING CONFERENCE
' r On July 1, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued a Notice ofHearing, setting the hearing to begin on December 13, 2016. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(1) and (7), it is hereby 

### ORDERED: 1. The parties shall appear by telephone for a prehearing conference with the undersigned judge onNovember 28, 2016 at lpm Eastern time. 2. The parties shall access the conference by dialing telephone number 888-204-5984 and then inputting access code 6392406 when prompted. 3. During the conference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss the issues in dispute, the upcoming hearing, the status ofany settlement negotiations, and any other related matters.

Attachment: Service List 

# ~WALD Administrative LawJudgeSERVICE LIST - BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1

ONE COPY Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 Miami, FL 33176 TEL: 305-598-4841 FAX: 305-598-4842 Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 Federal AviationAdministration Western-Pacific Region P. 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAX: 310-725-6816

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-1116 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.
1The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3569

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Northern

* District of Iowa.

Lorenzo Diaz, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: May 30, 2001

 Filed: June 5, 2001

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal following the grant of a reduction in sentence under Federal Rule

of Criminal Procedure 35(b), Lorenzo Diaz challenges the sentence imposed by the

district court.1 His counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court did not explain

adequately its downward departure. Counsel’s arguments amount to a challenge of the

extent of the departure. We have no jurisdiction to review on such grounds.
-2-

See United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam)

(dismissing appeal where Anders brief challenged extent of Rule 35(b) reduction

because appeal is not based on any criteria listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and grant defense

counsel’s motion to withdraw. We also grant Diaz’s motion to seal the Anders brief

and we direct the clerk to seal both the brief and the Rule 35(b) hearing transcript.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Arthur L. Goldberg, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Milestone Scientific Inc. (“theRegistrant”).2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: November 13, 2007 /s/ Arthur L. Goldberg   Arthur L. Goldberg   Acting Chief Financial Officer  
23
## Montana Association of Counties_,-

___

2715 SKYWAY DRIVE, SUITE A, HELENA,**MTS.9lio;r~?** -'"

April 5, 2013 Docket Operations M-30 West Building Ground Floor W 12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington DC 20590;3 United States ofAmerica Department ofTransportation Office ofSecretary Washington DC RE. Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 /4011\ 444-4%0 Frtx /4011\ 447-S:nR - ···•**~** ' l**'·~.** I_j

The Montana Association ofCounties strongly encourages the continuation of Essential Air Service to the Montana communities of Lewistown and Miles City. In both communities, air service may become the only commercial means ofaccessing larger airline hubs with the recent shut down of Rimrock Stages bus service. While some ofthe routes that Rimrock operated are slowing being replaced by other ground carriers, thatfuture is uncertain at best. The continuation ofservice to these communities is an essential part ofthe complete statewide connectivity in Montana and losing any ofthe links may well foreshadow the loss of EAS statewide, which would be very damaging to our state's economy. Billings is a medical center where two large tertiary medical centers are located. These centers serve the advanced medical needs ofcentral and eastern Montana. The air connectivity between Miles City and Lewistown may be a patient's best option to seek. medical services.

MACo

### Montana is astate ofvast distances when compared with most other states. Losing Essential Air Service in Lewistown and Miles City is not a matter of passengers being inconvenienced by an additional drive of 25- 50 miles. The distances between these communities and Billings are not all that differentthan from Washington DC to Philadelphia. The Montana Association ofCounties requests thatyou not enforce the Show Cause Order contained in Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 and to allow the Montana Essential AirTask Force and affected communities at leasttwo years to develop plans to increase ridership. Sincerely,

LHarold Blattie, Executive Director
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 277

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Schindler Project should be

recognized for its efforts to educate high school seniors about the lessons

of the Holocaust and the application of those lessons to contemporary

society.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. COHEN, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr.

DANFORTH, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. HARKIN,

Mr. HOLLINGS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. KOHL, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr.

MATHEWS, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. PACKWOOD, Mr.

PRESSLER, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SIMON, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. WARNER, and

Mr. WOFFORD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Schindler Project

should be recognized for its efforts to educate high school

seniors about the lessons of the Holocaust and the application of those lessons to contemporary society.

Whereas the Schindler Project is a nonprofit organization

founded by Marian Ungar Davis under the auspices of

the Holocaust Center of the United Jewish Federation of

Greater Pittsburgh;

Whereas the Schindler Project has developed a national program to provide every high school senior in the United

States with the opportunity to view the feature film,
2

SRES 277 IS

‘‘Schindler’s List’’ and then to discuss their views with

Holocaust survivors;

Whereas education is the foundation on which we form a

strong society;

Whereas teaching future generations about the Holocaust and

its lessons for humanity serves as the best assurance that

such atrocities will be prevented in the future;

Whereas the movie ‘‘Schindler’s List’’ depicts the moral catharsis of its central figure Oskar Schindler, from an indifferent observer of the Holocaust to the savior of more

than 1,200 Jews; and

Whereas the depiction of Oskar Schindler’s actions show in

a very compelling way, the profound impact one person’s

actions can have on the lives of others: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) the feature film ‘‘Schindler’s List’’ is an im3 portant tool in educating high school seniors about

4 the Holocaust; and

5 (2) the Senate supports the efforts of the

6 Schindler Project to provide students with the op7 portunity to view the film and discuss its historical

8 implications and the application of those lessons to

9 contemporary society.

Æ