alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 104

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for an adjournment of the two Houses.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, September 29, 1995, it stand ad4 journed until 10 a.m. on Friday, October 6, 1995, or until

5 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas6 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

7 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

8 or adjourns on any day beginning with Friday, September

9 29, 1995, through Friday, October 6, 1995, pursuant to
2

HCON 104 RDS

1 a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee in

2 accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or ad3 journed until noon on Tuesday, October 10, 1995, or until

4 such time on that day as may be specified by the Majority

5 Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn,

6 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified

7 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res8 olution, whichever occurs first.

9 Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

10 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

11 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead12 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

13 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

14 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives September 29,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 92 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 92

 Condemning the proposed withdrawal of North Korea from the Treaty on 
   the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                April 2 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

  Mr. Robb (for himself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Helms, Mr. Murkowski, and Mr. 
D'Amato) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Condemning the proposed withdrawal of North Korea from the Treaty on 
   the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and for other purposes.

Whereas North Korea stated its intention on March 12, 1993, to withdraw from the 
        Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, done on July 1, 
        1968;
Whereas North Korea remains obligated under the Treaty for a 90-day period;
Whereas no other country has ever formally withdrawn from the Treaty on the Non-
        Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons;
Whereas no other country has ever compelled the International Atomic Energy 
        Agency (IAEA) to request a special inspection of its nuclear facilities;
Whereas North Korea refuses to allow a special inspection of suspected nuclear 
        waste sites in violation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of 
        Nuclear Weapons;
Whereas representatives from 35 countries make up the IAEA Board of Governors 
        allowing the Agency to act in an impartial manner;
Whereas the United States withdrew all tactical nuclear weapons from the Korean 
        peninsula in 1991; and
Whereas annual Team Spirit U.S.-Republic of Korea exercises are conducted for 
        defensive purposes and are not a provocative act of war: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That (a) the Senate hereby condemns North Korea for its 
stated intention to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation 
of Nuclear Weapons.
    (b) It is the sense of the Senate that the United States and its 
international partners should take measured steps to compel North Korea 
to remain a party to the Treaty and to allow unconditional special 
inspections of apparent nuclear waste sites and other areas suspected 
of harboring a nuclear weapons-building program.

                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Overview of a Trajectory-Based Solution for En Route and Terminal Area Self-Spacing: Fifth EditionThis paper presents an overview of the fifth revision to an algorithm specifically designed to support NASA's Airborne Precision Spacing concept. This algorithm is referred to as the Airborne Spacing for Terminal Arrival Routes version 12 (ASTAR12). This airborne self-spacing concept is trajectory-based, allowing for spacing operations prior to the aircraft being on a common path. Because this algorithm is trajectory-based, it also has the inherent ability to support required-time-of- arrival (RTA) operations. This algorithm was also designed specifically to support a standalone, non-integrated implementation in the spacing aircraft. This current revision to the algorithm includes a ground speed feedback term to compensate for slower than expected traffic aircraft speeds based on the accepted air traffic control tendency to slow aircraft below the nominal arrival speeds when they are farther from the airport.Document ID20150003785Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAbbott, Terence S.*(Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. (SGT, Inc.) Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 27, 2015Publication DateFebruary 1, 2015Subject CategoryAircraft Communications And NavigationAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-20676NASA/CR-2015-218680Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 305295.02.31.07.01.07CONTRACT_GRANT: NNL10AA14BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20150003785.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-40862 Summary Calendar

JOHNNY LEE ELLIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

J. E. MERIT CONSTRUCTORS INCORPORATED, a subsidiary of Jacobs Engineering Group, Incorporated; ET AL,

Defendants,

J. E. MERIT CONSTRUCTORS INCORPORATED, a subsidiary of Jacobs Engineering Group Incorporated,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(C-96-CV-669)

April 28, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *2

Johnny Lee Ellis ("Ellis"), a 55-year-old male of Native

American national origin, started working for J. E. Merit

Constructors Inc. ("Merit") as a pipe fitter in April 1993. On

September 30, 1993, Merit discharged Ellis for alleged misconduct

in violat ion of a company work rule after an incident in which

Ellis and another co-worker opened and removed tools from a toolbox

that belonged to another employee. Following his discharge, Ellis

filed an EEOC charge of discrimination on June 30, 1994, and then

on December 20, 1996 commenced suit in federal court asserting

claims against Merit for discriminatory termination and assignment

of employment duties on the basis on national origin and age in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.

§ 2000e et seq. , and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

(ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621. On March 28, 1997 Merit moved for a

summary judgment on Ellis’ Title VII and ADEA claims and on May 21,

1997 the district court entered an Order granting Merit’s M otion

for Summary Judgment. Ellis now appeals.

We have carefully reviewed t he briefs, the reply brief, the

corrected reply brief, the record excerpts and various portions of

the record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in

its Order filed May 21, 1997, we are convinced that the Final

Judgment entered by the district court on May 21, 1997 should be,

and the same is hereby, AFFIRMED.
!

!

!

!

!

!

¬«3

£¤97

§ ̈¦5

¬«96

§ ̈¦5

Happy Camp

Callahan

Ft. Jones

Yreka

Weed

Goosenest

The Klamath National Forest cannot assure the acuracy of this information

for a particular purpose. Original data may have been compiled from various

sources. Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards.

This information may be updated without notification.

Project Area

0 0.5 1 2

Miles

Da

®

te: 3/8/2017

Klamath NF Rouge River - Siskiyou NF

T45 N

R11 W

T45 N

R10 W

T45 N R11 W

T46 N R11 W

T46 N

R10 W

T46 N

R9 W

T46 N R10 W

T47 N R10 W

T46 N R10 W

T45 N R10 W

T46 N

R10 W

T46 N

R11 W

T46 N

R9 W

T47 N

R9 W

T47 N

R10 W

T47 N

R11 W

T47 N

R10 W

T47 N

R9 W

T46 N

R11 W

T47 N

R11 W

20

33

16

27

2

35

14

11

12

12

36

6

21

9

15

11

12

1

24

7

5

21

16

28

14

18

31

19

7

8

16

4

10

3

23

1

24

30

7

19

5

8

4

15

22

15

2

11

23

35

30

7

18

7

29

32

29

5

28

4

34

22

22

10

36

25

13

7

6

6

32

9

33

3 2

2

23

24

31

24

9

11

26

2

35

12

12

31

31

8

28

10

10

26

5

33

4

27

27

11

1

6

6

29

8

32

20

5

4

3

3

10

25

1

30

6

20

17

5

16

33

3

34

3

2

23

2

25

18

29

9

9

34

34

11

36

26 25

1

1

13

6

9

35

26

14

36

7

17

17

21

4

27

22

13

1

19

12

32

17

8

20

8

28

21

15

10

14

13

19

30

18

115.35

115.33

115.34

115.33

HORSE CREEK COMMUNITY PROTECTION AND FOREST RESTORATION PROJECT

KARUK ALTERNATIVE

Happy Camp/Oak Knoll Ranger District

Klamath National Forest

Horse Creek Project Karuk Alternative

Project Boundary

Units Fuels Treatment

Karuk_Alt

Linear Fuels Treatment

Units_TimberTreatment

Karuk_Alt

Yes - Cable

Yes - Tractor

Yes - Site Prep and Plant in Botanical Area

Private Fuels Treatment

Karuk_Alt

Fuels Treatment Around Residential Private

Roadside Hazard 150 foot buffer

Karuk_Alt

Fuels Treatment Around Residential Private
Appendix 6 Acute Impacts Refined AnalysisRefined Acute Modeling Approach

Initial acute screening risk calculati ons were performed with the HEM-3

model. HEM-3 estimates acute (1-hour) im pacts at both polar and census block

receptors. It is assumed for this shor t period of time that an exposed individual

could be located at any off-site location. The lack of readily available detailed

property boundary information for many of th e facilities evaluated made it difficult

to determine whether receptors were on- or off-site. In the absence of such

information, the first ring of polar recept ors was placed 100 meters from the plant

center for many facilities. However, these polar rings often transected on-site

locations, restricting public access to exposures at these levels and thereby

overestimating exposures.

The screening approach used by HEM-3 to estimate maximum 1-hour

exposures also likely overestimate s. To estimate maximum 1-hour

concentrations at each receptor, HEM-3 sums the maximum concentrations

attributed to each source, regardless of whether those maximum concentrations

occurred during the same hour. In ot her words, HEM-3 assumes that the

maximum impact from each source at each re ceptor occurs at the same time. In

actuality, maximum impacts from different sources may occur at different times.

This appendix includes the resu lts of refined acute assessments

performed for facilities that exceeded short-term health benchmarks using the

HEM-3 approach. The refinements can addr ess both areas of conservatism

described above. The simplest refinement is to plot the HEM-3 polar grid results

on aerial photographs of the facilities; this allows the assessment of off-site

locations that may be accessible to the public ( e.g., roadways and public

buildings.). The attached figure present the estimated hazard quotient values

(the modeled 1-hour concentration of a pollu tant divided by its short-term health

benchmark) at the polar rec eptors near the facilities.HEM‐3(Screening)RefinedResultsNEI16665 FormaldehydeREL2.40.5Examined facility for maximum off-site impactNEI42539GlycolEthersREL2.21.0Examined facility for maximum off-site impactTable 1 – Maximum Predicted Acute Risks Greater than 1 (Refined Approach)Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations1Indicatesmodelingtechniqueusedtorefinedestimates;seeAppendix6forfiguresdepictingoff‐siteimpactsFacilityNEIIDPollutant CriteriaRefinedModelingApproach1Baseline‐Actuals

# Copyrighted page(s) removed. Copyrighted

material is not available in Regulations.gov since

it may not be reproduced without consent of the

copyright holder.

Removed pages can be viewed at the USEPA

Docket Center, Public Reading Room.

Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW

Room 3334

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: 202-566-1744

Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 254

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Office of Senate Fair

Employment Practices, and to authorize the Office of the Sergeant at

Arms of the United States Senate to intervene and to be represented

by its counsel of choice, in Kenneth Riggin, et al. v. Office of Senate

Fair Employment Practices, No. 94–6004 (Fed. Cir.).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 25 (legislative day, AUGUST 18), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Office

of Senate Fair Employment Practices, and to authorize

the Office of the Sergeant at Arms of the United States

Senate to intervene and to be represented by its counsel

of choice, in Kenneth Riggin, et al. v. Office of Senate

Fair Employment Practices, No. 94–6004 (Fed. Cir.).

Whereas, in the case of Kenneth Riggin, et al. v. Office of

Senate Fair Employment Practices, No. 94–6004, pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal

Circuit, the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices

is the respondent in a proceeding under section 309 of

the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (2 U.S.C. 1209), to review
2

SRES 254 ATS

a final decision concerning allegations of discrimination

in Senate employment;

Whereas section 303(f) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (2

U.S.C. 1203(f)), provides that for the purpose of representation by the Senate Legal Counsel, the Office of

Senate Fair Employment Practices shall be deemed a

committee within the meaning of title VII of the Ethics

in Government Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. 288, et seq.);

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. 288b(a),

288c(a)(1)) the Senate may direct its counsel to defend

a committee of the Senate in any civil action in which

there is placed in issue any action taken by such committee in its official capacity; and

Whereas, in accordance with section 2348 of title 28, United

States Code, as made applicable by section 309(b) of the

Civil Rights Act of 1991 (2 U.S.C. 1209(b)) the Office

of the Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, as

a party in interest in the underlying proceeding within

the Senate, may intervene on judicial review of the final

decision in that proceeding: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to represent the Office of Senate Fair Employment Prac3 tices in the case of Kenneth Riggin, et al. v. Office of Sen4 ate Fair Employment Practices.

5 SEC. 2. The Office of the Sergeant at Arms of the

6 United States Senate may as a matter of statutory right

7 intervene and be represented by its counsel of choice in
3

SRES 254 ATS

1 the case of Kenneth Riggin; et al. v. Office of Senate Fair

2 Employment Practices.

Æ
§ 1.6013-7 Joint return for year in which nonresident alien becomes resident of the United States. ( a ) *Election for special treatment* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Two individuals who are husband and wife at the close of a taxable year ending on or after December 31, 1975, may make an election under this section for that taxable year if one spouse is a citizen or resident of the United States on the last day of that taxable year and the other spouse is a nonresident alien at the beginning of that taxable year and a citizen or resident of the United States at the close of that taxable year. Two married individuals who are nonresident aliens at the beginning of a taxable year and who are U.S. citizens or residents on the last day of that taxable year qualify for the election. The effect of the election is that each spouse is treated as a resident of the United States for purposes of chapters 1, 5, and 24 and sections 6012, 6013, 6072, and 6091 of the code for all of that taxable year. A husband and wife may not make an election if an election has previously been made under this section by either spouse.
( 2 ) *Particular rules.* The rules in subdivisions (ii) through (v) of § 1.6013-6(a)(2) are applicable to this section.
( 3 ) *Time and manner of making an election.* A husband and wife shall make the election under this section in accordance with the rules in § 1.6013-6(a)(4).
( b ) *Section 6013(g) election in effect.* If an election under section 6013(g) is in effect for a year subsequent to the first taxable year for which made and during that subsequent year the husband and wife meet the requirements of section 6013(h) and paragraph (a)(1) of this section, then the election under section 6013(g) shall apply to that subsequent taxable year. A separate election under section 6013(h) is not required for that subsequent taxable year.
[T.D. 7670, 45 FR 6931, Jan. 31, 1980]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The history, present condition,and future of the molluscan fisheries of North and Central America and Europe[electronic resource]**
 
Volumes: 010203
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.13:NMFS 127 | C 55.13:NMFS128 | C 55.13:NMFS 129
Item Number:0208-C-04 (MF)
CGP systemNumber:000766438
 
August 26, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 242 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 242

Honoring the 14 Federal firefighters who died while fighting a wildfire 
                    near Glenwood Springs, Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 13 (legislative day, July 11), 1994

  Mr. Campbell (for himself, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Reid, Mr. 
   Bryan, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. Burns, Mr. Packwood, Ms. 
Mikulski, Mr. Bumpers, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Craig, Mr. Mathews, Mr. Brown, 
Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Biden, Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Kempthorne, Mr. Dole, and Mr. 
Stevens) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the 14 Federal firefighters who died while fighting a wildfire 
                    near Glenwood Springs, Colorado.

Whereas on July 6, 1994, 14 Federal firefighters from the United States Forest 
        Service and the Bureau of Land Management perished while heroically 
        fighting a raging wildfire on Storm King Mountain near Glenwood Springs, 
        Colorado;
Whereas the firefighters died when they were overswept by a wildfire whipped by 
        high and erratic winds;
Whereas the 14 firefighters who gave their lives were Kathi J. Beck, hot shot 
        crewmember, Prineville, Oregon, Tamara J. Bickett, hot shot crewmember, 
        Prineville, Oregon, Scott A. Blecha, hot shot crewmember, Prineville, 
        Oregon, Levi Brinkley, hot shot crewmember, Prineville, Oregon, Robert 
        Browning, helitack, Grand Junction, Colorado, Douglas Dunbar, hot shot 
        crewmember, Prineville, Oregon, Terri A. Hagen, hot shot crewmember, 
        Prineville, Oregon, Bonnie J. Holtby, hot shot crewmember, Prineville, 
        Oregon, Robert A. Johnson, hot shot crewmember, Prineville, Oregon, Jon 
        R. Kelso, hot shot squad leader, Prineville, Oregon, Donald Mackey, 
        smokejumper, Missoula, Montana, Roger Roth, smokejumper, McCall, Idaho, 
        James Thrash, smokejumper, McCall, Idaho, and Richard Tyler, helitack, 
        Grand Junction, Colorado; and
Whereas these brave men and women gave their lives in an attempt to protect 
        American lives, property, and natural resources: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate honors, and will always remember, the 14 
Federal firefighters who died on July 6, 1994, for their heroic efforts 
in trying to contain a fire on Storm King Mountain near Glenwood 
Springs, Colorado, in order to protect American lives, property, and 
natural resources.
                                 <all>
```
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4473 — MLCP/CIR/Oakwood)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 288/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----