alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Antonio F. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael T.W. BELL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6040.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2002.

Decided June 21, 2002.

*703Antonio F. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio F. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 *&*Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *Williams v. Bell,*No. CA-00-372-5-3F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 Wé note that Williams’s objections to the report of the magistrate judge were timely under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (1994). *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). We have considered the objections and the points raised in Williams’s informal brief to this court in reaching our decision.
exv10w01



 





Exhibit 10.01




SHARE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT




     This Agreement is made February 27, 2007 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Intuit Inc., a
Delaware corporation (“Intuit”), and Stephen M. Bennett (“Bennett”).



     WHEREAS, Intuit desires to repurchase shares of Intuit common stock issued to Bennett (the
“Shares”), which shares were originally issued to Bennett pursuant to Restricted Stock Purchase
Agreements entered into by Intuit and Bennett as of January 24, 2000 and amended as of January 17,
2001 (the “Stock Purchase Agreements”), the proceeds of which shall be used by Bennett to satisfy
the federal, state and Medicare tax obligations resulting from the vesting of 15,000 shares
pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreements, and



     WHEREAS, Bennett desires that Intuit repurchase the Shares to enable Bennett to satisfy the
tax obligations,



     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:



     1. Intuit agrees to repurchase 5,362 Shares from Bennett (the “Repurchased Shares”), at a
price per share equal to the closing price on the Nasdaq Stock Market of a share of Intuit Common
Stock on the Effective Date (the “Repurchase Share Price”). The product of (i) the Repurchased
Shares and (ii) the Repurchase Share Price shall equal the aggregate “Purchase Price”.



     2. Bennett agrees to deliver to Intuit on the Effective Date a stock certificate(s)
representing a number of Shares equal to or in excess of the number of Repurchased Shares, along
with instructions regarding the issuance and delivery of a certificate (if any) representing Shares
in excess of the Repurchased Shares.



     3. Intuit agrees to transmit the Purchase Price to the tax authorities as set forth in
Paragraph 4 below.



     4. Bennett hereby instructs Intuit (i) to transmit $110,531.25 to the U.S. Treasury as Federal
income tax withholding and $6,410.81 to the U.S. Treasury as required Medicare tax withholding, and
(ii) to transmit $41,117.63 to the State of California as California State income tax withholding.



 









 





     IN WITNESS THEREOF, Intuit (by its duly authorized representative) and Bennett have executed
this Agreement as of the Effective Date.



	 	 	 
	INTUIT INC.

	 	STEPHEN M. BENNETT
	 
	 	 
	By: /s/ KIRAN M. PATEL

	 	By: /s/ STEPHEN M. BENNETT
	 

	 	 
	Kiran M. Patel

Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer

	 	Stephen M. Bennett

President and Chief Executive Officer






     [SIGNATURE PAGE TO THE SHARE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR STEPHEN M. BENNETT]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 790 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the firearm transfer 

tax, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mrs. HINSON (for herself, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. POSEY, Mr. 

MANN, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. HUDSON, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. MOONEY, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WEBER of 

Texas, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. BANKS, Ms. 

GREENE of Georgia, Mr. AMODEI, and Mr. WOMACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the firearm transfer tax, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repealing Illegal Free5 dom and Liberty Excises Act’’ or the ‘‘RIFLE Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 790 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CERTAIN TAXES RELATING TO FIRE2 ARMS. 

3 (a) FIREARM TRANSFER TAX REPEALED.—Section 

4 5811 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is hereby re5 pealed. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (1) Section 4182(a) of such Code is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘on which the tax provided by section 

9 5811 has been paid’’ and inserting ‘‘with respect to 

10 which the tax provided by section 5811 (as in effect 

11 immediately before the enactment of the Repealing 

12 Illegal Freedom and Liberty Excises Act) would 

13 have applied but for its repeal’’. 

14 (2) Section 5846 of such Code is amended by 

15 striking ‘‘, 5811,’’. 

16 (3) Section 5852 of such Code is amended by 

17 striking ‘‘section 5811’’ each place it appears and 

18 inserting ‘‘section 5811 (as in effect immediately be19 fore the enactment of the Repealing Illegal Freedom 

20 and Liberty Excises Act)’’. 

21 (4) Section 5853 of such Code is amended by 

22 striking ‘‘section 5811’’ and inserting ‘‘section 5811 

23 (as in effect immediately before the enactment of the 

24 Repealing Illegal Freedom and Liberty Excises 

25 Act)’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 790 IH

1 (5) Section 5854 of such Code is amended by 

2 striking ‘‘section 5811’’ and inserting ‘‘section 5811 

3 (as in effect immediately before the enactment of the 

4 Repealing Illegal Freedom and Liberty Excises 

5 Act)’’. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to transfers after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act. 

9 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

10 Nothing in this Act shall be construed to place any 

11 firearms regulated under Chapter 53 of the Internal Rev12 enue Code of 1986 (the National Firearms Act) under the 

13 jurisdiction of the United States Consumer Product Safety 

14 Commission. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000058 07-MAY-2014 08:06 AM
#### § 1.584-5 Returns of banks with respect to common trust funds.

For rules applicable to filing returns of common trust funds, see section 6032 and the regulations thereunder.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136755 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136755 

 COA: 282121 

Branch CC: 98-066617-FH 

MIGUEL DIAZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 4, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
# Let's Move

              - Home
              - Blog
              - About Let's Move
              - En español

          - Learn the Facts
          - About Let's Move
          - Eat Healthy
          - Get Active
          - Take Action
          - Join Us

            -    *Top Ten FLOTUS Let's Move! Moments*
Take a look back at the top *Let’s Move!* moments over the course of the Obama Administration. 

READ MORE
 
            -    *Top Ten Let's Move! Videos*
Watch the top videos featuring First Lady Michelle Obama - from dancing with Ellen DeGeneres to sharing her workout routine.

READ MORE
 
            -    *Impact of Let's Move!*
Through the leadership of First Lady Michelle Obama, we have made incredible progress improving the health of the next generation.

READ MORE
 
            -    *White House Kitchen Garden*
Learn more about the White House Kitchen Garden and how to plant your own garden.

READ MORE
 
            -    *Let's Move! Programs*
Progress has taken root in communities across the country thanks to a variety of programs that have brought the mission of *Let’s Move!* to life.

READ MORE
 

Previous

Next

## Let's Move

## Most Recent

January 4, 2017

Onward

Posted by Debra Eschmeyer, Executive Director of Let’s Move! and Senior Policy Advisor for Nutrition

At the launch of *Let’s Move!*in 2010*,* President Obama established a Task Force on Childhood Obesity clearly stating his goal to solve the problem of childhood obesity within a generation and announcing the First Lady’s role in leading a national public awareness effort to improve the health of our children.  

He stated: "To meet our goal, we must accelerate implementation of successful strategies that will prevent and combat obesity. Such strategies include updating child nutrition policies in a way that addresses the best available scientific information, ensuring access to healthy, affordable food in schools and communities, as well as increasing physical activity and empowering parents and caregivers with the information and tools they need to make good choices for themselves and their families. They will help our children develop lifelong healthy habits, ensuring they reach their greatest potential toward building a healthier and more prosperous America."

Continue reading story

## Most Popular

                    -  Onward 
                    -  In Review: Top 10 FLOTUS Let’s Move! Moments 
                    -  Making the Healthy Choice the Easy Choice: What the Record Shows 
                    -  Let’s Move! Programs Engage a Nation 

 

        - Parents
        - Kids
        - Schools
        - More

Let's Move on Twitter

Let's Move on Facebook

Let's Move on Youtube

Let's Move on Meetup

letsmove.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

          - Accessibility
          - Privacy Policy
          - Newsroom
          - Logos/Link to Us
#### § 1.860-1 Deficiency dividends.

Section 860 allows a qualified investment entity to be relieved from the payment of a deficiency in (or to be allowed a credit or refund of) certain taxes. “Qualified investment entity” is defined in section 860(b). The taxes referred to are those imposed by sections 852(b)(1) and (3), 857(b)(1) or (3), the minimum tax on tax preferences imposed by section 56 and, if the entity fails the distribution requirements of section 852(a)(1)(A) or 857(a)(1) (as applicable), the corporate income tax imposed by section 11(a) or 1201(a). The method provided by section 860 is to allow an additional deduction for a dividend distribution (that meets the requirements of section 860 and § 1.860-2) in computing the deduction for dividends paid for the taxable year for which the deficiency is determined. A deficiency divided may be an ordinary dividend or, subject to the limitations of sections 852(b)(3)(C), 857(b)(3)(C), and 860(f)(2)(B), may be a capital gain dividend.

(Sec. 7805, 68A Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805; sec. 860(e) (92 Stat. 2849, 26 U.S.C. 860(e)); sec. 860(g) (92 Stat. 2850, 26 U.S.C. 860(g)))

[T.D. 7936, 49 FR 2107, Jan. 18, 1984]
§ 1.1016-6 Other applicable rules. ( a ) Adjustments must always be made to eliminate double deductions or their equivalent. Thus, in the case of the stock of a subsidiary company, the basis thereof must be properly adjusted for the amount of the subsidiary company's losses for the years in which consolidated returns were made.
( b ) In determining basis, and adjustments to basis, the principles of estoppel apply, as elsewhere under the Code, and prior internal revenue laws.
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.5580 *Alpha*-1-lipoprotein immunological test system. ( a ) *Identification.* An *alpha*-1-lipoprotein immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the *alpha-*1-lipoprotein (high-density lipoprotein) in serum and plasma. Measurement of *alpha-*1-lipoprotein may aid in the diagnosis of Tangier disease (a hereditary disorder of fat metabolism).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

Served: March 19, 2015

NOTICE

When the Department grants statements of authorization permitting foreign air carriers to 

display the codes of U.S. air carrier partners, it includes a standard condition that states:

Notwithstanding any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our approval here 

is expressly conditioned upon the requirement that the operating carrier shall not 

permit the code of its U.S. code-sharing partner to be carried on any flight that enters, 

departs, or transits the airspace of any area for whose airspace the Federal Aviation 

Administration has issued a flight prohibition.

Since February 15, 1995 (Order 95-2-34) this requirement has been applicable to all 

then-existing and future statements of authorization authorizing foreign air carriers to 

conduct code-sharing operations in which a U.S. carrier’s code is carried on a foreign 

carrier’s aircraft.

We have received a communication from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

stating that, given the growing concerns about regional conflict zones around the world,

and in conjunction with the ongoing work of the International Civil Aviation 

Organization (ICAO) Task Force on Regional Conflict Zones and the recent High Level 

Safety Conference in Montreal, the FAA wants to ensure that carriers are reminded of the 

above condition, and the FAA requests that we issue a Notice to that effect.

We expressly remind carriers of the above condition. We also remind them that failure to 

adhere to conditions attached to their statements of authorization renders them liable to 

enforcement action by the Department’s Office of Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings. Should we receive information indicating that a carrier holding a statement 

of authorization has failed to adhere to the condition, we will promptly forward that 

information to the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings for appropriate 

action.

While the above-quoted condition attaches to authorizations granted to foreign air 

carriers, we expect the U.S.-code-share partners of foreign air carriers to monitor their 

partners’ operations to ensure compliance with the above-quoted condition.
2

The Department will serve this Notice by electronic mail on certificated U.S. carriers, 

licensed foreign air carriers, the U.S. Department of State (Office of Aviation 

Negotiations), and the Federal Aviation Administration.

By:

PAUL L. GRETCH

Director, Office of International Aviation

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18061]



[[Page 37737]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,477]


SER Enterprise/DHL Logistics, Ogden, UT; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on June 30, 
2009 on behalf of workers of SER Enterprise/DHL Logistics, Ogden, Utah.
    Petitions filed by a group of adversely affected workers must be 
signed by at least three workers. Since the petition did not include 
signatures by at least three workers, the petition regarding the 
investigation has been deemed invalid. Consequently, the investigation 
has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of July 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18061 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### §§ 1.806-1-1.806-2 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2007-D-0372]

# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled Adverse Event Reporting and Recordkeeping for Dietary Supplements as Required by the Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Daniel Gittleson, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-5156.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 15, 2008 (73 FR 53252), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0635. The approval expires on May 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: July 28, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-18532 Filed 8-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
EX-10.1



 





EXHIBIT 10.1




[NAME]

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE GRANT

20xx-20xx




PURPOSE



To provide a meaningful motivation and reward for [performance objective] in [Line of Business
(“LOB”) General Metric] over the next three years. To further align your interests with the
interests of shareholders.




BASIC GRANT CONCEPTS



This grant is a Long-Term Performance Unit grant. A Long-Term Performance Unit plan provides a
[contingent] grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) at the beginning of the performance cycle
that represents the Target Units to be earned at the end of the performance cycle. An RSU
represents the right to receive one share of Phoenix common stock. The Target Units are based on a
$[x] target award divided by Phoenix’s stock price as of [date of grant] ($xx.xx). The number of
RSUs actually earned at the end of the cycle may be higher than the Target Units, depending on the
extent to which the performance objectives are achieved. The maximum units are based on a $[x]
maximum award divided by Phoenix’s stock price as of [date of grant] ($xx.xx). The ultimate value
of the award depends on both the number of RSUs earned and Phoenix’s stock price at the end of the
cycle.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Award Summary
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Target	 	Target	 	 
	Type of	 	Performance	 	 	 	Award	 	RSUs	 	Maximum
	Award	 	Period	 	Performance Criteria	 	Value	 	Awarded	 	RSUs
	Performance-Based 

RSUs
	 	20xx-20xx
	 	General Metric (see

details below)
	 	[$]
	 	[#] (1)
	 	[#]

(xxx% of Target)








 




			
	(1)	 	Determined by dividing the Target Award Value by the closing stock price on [date of grant].




PERFORMANCE CRITERIA:

Your actual RSUs awarded at the end of the Performance Cycle will be based on the achievement of
the following performance criteria:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Performance Criteria and Award Calculation
	Performance Period 20xx-20xx
	Line of Business Goal(s)	 	Performance Metric	 	Award Payment
	Goal 1
	 	 	 	x% of Target Units
	Goal 2
	 	 	 	xx% of Target Units
	Goal 3
	 	 	 	xxx% of Target Units
	(as needed)
	 	 	 	 
	Details of the Line of Business Metric	 	 





This award is subject to pro-rated vesting in the event of termination due to death, Disability or
Approved Retirement (as these terms are defined in the Plan), in each case, such pro-ration to
reflect adjustment for actual performance results.