alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RM07-10-002]

As announced in the Notice of Technical Conference issued on February 22, 2010, a technical conference will be held on March 25, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. (EST) in the Commission Meeting Room at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The conference is open for the public to attend.

In that notice we stated on page 3 that the conference would not be webcast. However, we are now planning to webcast the conference. Set forth below is the information you will need to view the technical conference.

                    The webcast of the technical conference is free and registration to view the webcast is not required. Webcast viewers will not be permitted to participate during the technical conference. Anyone with Internet access interested in viewing this conference can do so by navigating to                     *Calendar of Events*                     on the FERC Web site. The events will contain a link to the applicable webcast option.                 

                    The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the webcasts and offers the option of listening to the conferences via phone-bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit                     *http://www.CapitolConnection.org*                     or call (703) 993-3100.                

                    For additional information, please contact Christopher Peterson at 202-502-8933 or                     *Christopher.Peterson@ferc.gov*                     and Thomas Russo at 202-502-8792 or                     *Thomas.Russo@ferc.gov*                     of FERC's Office of Enforcement.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-4993 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN DUFFY CONOVER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 476 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of February, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
I N THE S UPREME COURT OF THE S TATE OF MONTANA No . DA 23-0748 S TATE OF MONTANA, Pe t it io ne r, v . JONATHAN PARTAI N, Re spo nde nt .
ORDE R GRA N TING EXTE NSION UPON co nside rat io n o f Re spo nde n t ’s m o t io n fo r e x t e n sio n o f t im e , as we ll as ag re e m e nt , I T I S HEREBY ORDERED t hat Re spo nde nt is g rant ed an e x t e nsio n of t im e up t o and including Aug u st 28, 2024, wit hin which t o pre pare , file , and se rv e Re s po nde nt ’s brie f on appe al.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2024

07/17/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0748
# C_2017277EN.01003002.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2017 — France v Commission

(Case T-74/14) (1)

1

((State aid - Aid measures implemented by France in favour of SNCM - Restructuring aid and mesures taken in the context of a privatisation plan - Private investor in a market economy test - Decision declaring the aid unlawful and incompatible with the internal market - Re-opening of the formal investigation procedure - Obligation to state reasons))

(2017/C 277/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: initially G. de Bergues, D. Colas, E. Belliard and J. Bousin, and subsequently D. Colas, E. Belliard and J. Bousin, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 7066 final of 20 November 2013, concerning State aid SA.16237 (C 58/2002) (ex N 118/2002) implemented by France in favour of SNCM.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATJOM ^ 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

AIRLINE TRANSPORT PROFESSIONALS, 

Respondent. 

JUDGE NOT YET ASSIGNED 

iVEi 

yW,< ^ -^ ^ 

r htMw 

sy 

FAA Docket No. (unassigned) ^ 

FAA Case No. 2008EA210042„-^ <fff\ 2C>I I 'C^Z^ i 

FAACaseNo. 2008EA210045^ ^ ,, K7S) < 

CORRECTION TO 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE 

RESPONDENT'S TIMELINESS ARGUMENT 

AND 

MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS 

PENDING A DECISION ON THIS MOTION 

ix:' 

n 

i.O 

\ u j 

VJ.J 

0 ^ 5 r^ 

oi^ 

0 0 

Paragraph 8 of the Complainant's motion filed on March 17, 2011, should cite 14 C.F.R. 

§13.208(d)not§13.218(d). 

th Respectfully submitted this 18^ day of March, 2011. 

GERALD A. ELLIS 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 
m 

f^ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Correction To Complainant's Motion To Strike 

Respondent's Timeliness Argument and Motion For Stay of Proceedings Pending a 

Decision On This Motion has been sent by Certified and Regular Mail to the following: 

Hearing Docket (original + 1 copy) 

Room924A-AGC-10 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Alan Armstrong, Esq. (1 copy) 

Park Ridge 85 Office Park 

Building 5 

2900 Chamblee-Tucker Road 

r f Atlanta, GA 30341 

Derrick S. Dennis, CEO (1 copy) 

Airline Transport Professionals 

1555 The Greens Way 

Jaqksomdlle Beach, FL 32^ 

icl 

LegdLXsS 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

iiJAR I 8 ^Ul 

Dated
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   1,003,853
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              188,680
<ALLOWANCES>                                                30,000
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         1,840,526
<PP&E>                                                   2,050,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                             918,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           3,118,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,306,661
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     5,121
<OTHER-SE>                                                 276,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             3,118,578
<SALES>                                                    196,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           196,026
<CGS>                                                       47,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            4,547,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          77,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (4,327,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (4,327,994)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (4,327,994)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.85)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered August 26, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01365
- CV
UNITED MEDICAL SUPPL Y COMPANY, INC., Appellant
V. ANSELL HEALTHCARE PR ODUCTS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 02
- 0433
- C 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s August 22, 2013 motion for extension of time to file appellant’s reply brief

. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the reply brief tendered by appe llant on August 22, 2013 be timely filed as of today’s date.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
§ 1.563-2 Personal holding company tax. In the case of a personal holding company subject to the provisions of section 541, dividends paid after the close of the taxable year and before the 15th day of the third month thereafter shall be included in the computation of the dividends paid deduction for the taxable year only if the taxpayer so elects in its return for such taxable year. The election shall be made by including such dividends in computing its dividends paid deduction. The amount of such dividends which may be included in computing the dividends paid deduction for the taxable year shall not exceed either: ( a ) The undistributed personal holding company income of the corporation for the taxable year, computed without regard to this section, or
( b ) In the case of a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1969, 20 percent (10 percent, in the case of a taxable year beginning before Jan. 1, 1970) of the sum of the dividends paid during the taxable year (not including consent dividends), computed without regard to this section
In computing the amount of the dividends paid deduction allowable for any taxable year, the amount allowed by reason of section 563(b) for any preceding taxable year is considered a dividend paid in such preceding taxable year and not in the year of actual distribution. Thus, a double deduction is not allowable. [T.D. 7079, 35 FR 18587, Dec. 8, 1970]
exv10wow1



 










Exhibit 10-O-1




Annual Incentive Compensation Plan Metrics for 2007



On
February 27, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved
the specific performance goals and business criteria to be used for purposes of determining any
future cash awards for 2007 for participants, including executive officers, under the Company’s
shareholder-approved Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10-T to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999). For most participants, the
performance criteria and weightings to be used for 2007 under the plan include attaining specified
levels of:





	 	•	 	total company pre-tax profits (40%),
	 
	 	•	 	relevant business unit pre-tax profits (15%),
	 
	 	•	 	total Automotive operating-related cash flow (20%),
	 
	 	•	 	relevant business unit cost reductions (8.33%),
	 
	 	•	 	relevant business unit market shares (8.33%), and
	 
	 	•	 	relevant business unit quality metrics (8.33%).




For some participants, including certain executive officers, whose job responsibilities encompass
multiple business units, the performance criteria to be used for 2007 under the plan include
attaining specified levels of:





	 	•	 	total company pre-tax profits (55%),
	 
	 	•	 	total Automotive operating-related cash flow (20%),
	 
	 	•	 	total company cost reductions (8.33%),
	 
	 	•	 	total company market shares (8.33%), and
	 
	 	•	 	total company quality metrics (8.33%).




Based on business performance results for 2007 against the targeted levels established for each
criterion, the Compensation Committee will determine the percentage of the target award that is
earned, which could range between 0% and 200% depending on actual performance achieved relative to
the target levels. In addition, individual awards may be increased (within limits set by the
Compensation Committee) or decreased from a formula amount, based on leadership level or salary
grade level, to reward a person’s performance.
427 A.2d 1209

#### Commonwealth v. Strohl, Appellant.

Submitted June 29, 1979.

Terence L. Faul, for appellant;

John E. Gallagher, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before HESTER, HOFFMAN and CATANIA, JJ.*

*

 President Judge Francis J. Catania, of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
(logo) DHG

DIXON HUGHES GOODMAN LLP

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Managers of C-III Capital Partners LLC, the 

Sole Member of C-III Asset Management LLC:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that C-III Asset Management LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Company acted as servicerinvolving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(i) – 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standardsestablished by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicingcriteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report, and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to eachasset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe thatour examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion.Our examination does not providea legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company compliedwith the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 is fairly stated, in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

Asheville, North Carolina 

March 1, 2016
#### § 1.661(b)-2 Character of amounts distributed when charitable contributions are made.

In the application of the rule stated in § 1.661(b)-1, the items of deduction which enter into the computation of distributable net income are allocated among the items of income which enter into the computation of distributable net income in accordance with the rules set forth in § 1.652(b)-3, except that, in the absence of specific provisions in the governing instrument, or unless local law requires a different apportionment, amounts paid, permanently set aside, or to be used for the charitable, etc., purposes specified in section 642(c) are first ratably apportioned among each class of items of income entering into the computation of the distributable net income of the estate or trust, in accordance with the rules set out in paragraph (b) of § 1.643(a)-5.
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Digital Collections
National Jukebox
§ 1.6073-3 Short taxable years. ( a ) *Individuals other than farmers or fishermen.* In the case of short taxable years the declaration shall be filed on or before the 15th day of the 4th month of such taxable year if the requirements of section 6015(a) are met on or before the 1st day of the 4th month of such year. If such requirements are first met after the 1st day of the 4th month but before the 2d day of the 6th month, the declaration must be filed on or before the 15th day of the 6th month. If such requirements are first met after the 1st day of the 6th month but before the 2d day of the 9th month, the declaration must be filed on or before the 15th day of the 9th month. If, however, the period for which the declaration is filed is one of 4 months, or one of 6 months and the requirements of section 6015(a) are not met until after the 1st day of the 4th month, or one of 9 months and such requirements are not met until after the 1st day of the 6th month, the declaration may be filed on or before the 15th day of the succeeding taxable year.
( b ) *Farmers or fishermen.* In the case of an individual: ( 1 ) Whose current taxable year is a short taxable year and whose estimated gross income from farming or fishing (including oyster farming) is at least two-thirds of his total estimated gross income from all sources for such current taxable year, or
( 2 ) Whose taxable year preceding the current taxable year was a short taxable year and whose gross income from farming or fishing (including oyster farming) was at least two-thirds of the total gross income from all sources shown on the return for such preceding short taxable year (with respect to declarations of estimated tax for taxable years beginning after November 10, 1978), he may file a declaration of estimated tax on or before the 15th day of the month immediately following the close of the current taxable year, in lieu of the time prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Nonresident aliens.* Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, in the case of a short taxable year, a nonresident alien described in section 6072(c) (relating to returns of nonresident aliens whose wages are not subject to withholding) whose anticipated income for the short taxable year meets the requirements of section 6015(a). Sections 1.6015(a)-1, 1.6015(g)-1, and 1.6015(i)-1 on or before the 1st day of the 6th month following the beginning of such year need not file a declaration of estimated tax before the 15th day of the 6th month following the beginning of such year.
[T.D. 6678, 28 FR 10516, Oct. 1, 1963, as amended by T.D. 7719, 45 FR 60903, Sept. 15, 1980]
NO. 12-09-00316-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

REBECCA LOUISE MOORE, ' APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by 

Appellant and her counsel. No decision having been delivered by this court, the motion 

is granted, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2.

Opinion delivered October 21, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)