alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, David B. Johnston, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of ImmunoGen, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: August 19, 2015

 
| /s/ David B. Johnston                                                                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David B. Johnston                                                                                  |   |
| Executive Vice   President, Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

----
5530

5390

5440

5420

5800

5730

5770

5720

5460

5780

5450

5400

5740

5470

5410

5430

5710

5510

5810

5480

5370

5180

5380

305

310

311

1964

012

1958

1957

455

309

380

456

457

431

301

312

470 441

112

365

432

471

459

428

379

364

385

345

300

240

315

429

359

325

348

393

373

346

322

386

347

384

366

402

326

434

343

406

919 440

101

448

472

388

323

307

103

361

375

352

357

356

329

320

716

478

336

360

331

354

712

327

332

363

306

480

340

010

4400

4000

4200

380

3

0

600

3400

3200

3000

2800

4600

4800

5000

2600

5200

5400 5600

2400

4800 4800

3800

4800

5600

4600

4800

5200

4400

3000

4600

4400

3400

5000

4000

4200

5600

3200

4600

3600

4800

4400

5000

3800

3000

3600

4200

4600

4400

4600

4800

5000

4600

3600

4400

4800

5000

4600

5200

3600

3400

4000

4600

4800

5000

3400

3200

4800

2800

4600

5000

3800

5000

5400

Ü 0 0.25 0.5 1

Miles

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

By removing the contents of this package or taking receipt of these files via electronic file transfer methods, you understand

that the data stored on this media is in draft condition. Represented features may not be in an accurate geographic

location. The Forest Service makes no expressed or implied warranty, including warranty of merchantability and fitness,

with respect to the character, function, or capailities of the data or their propriateness for any user's purposes. The

Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update, modify, or replace this geospatial information without notification.

For more information, contact McKenzie River Ranger District: 822-3381

Decom_Road

Project Area

Regeneration

Thinning

Forest Rd 19

Streams

Wilderness

Critical Habitat Unit

Temp Spur

Date: 2/15/2017

tjr

Green Mountain Project

Alternative 2 - modified (south)
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN



 Exhibit 10.3(b) 
 COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION 
 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 This FIRST AMENDMENT
(this “Amendment”) to the CompuCredit Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is made by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors pursuant to and in
accordance with Section 7.9 of the Plan and the duly adopted resolutions of Committee dated November 5, 2004. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date the Plan was originally adopted. 
  

	1.	Section 3.2(A) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the following: 

 A. ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE DEFINED. Except as otherwise required by Code Section 423 or other
applicable law, including, without limitation, securities laws of a foreign jurisdiction applicable to such Employee, an Employee shall be considered an Eligible Employee for purposes of participation in the Plan as of the first Offering
Commencement Date after Employee completes thirty calendar days of continuous service with the Company. In addition, each Employee employed by the Company on the Effective Date (as defined in Section 7.8) will be considered an Eligible
Employee. For purposes of the Plan, the employment relationship shall be treated as continuing intact while the individual is on sick leave or other leave of absence approved by the Company. Where the period of leave exceeds ninety (90) days
and the individual’s right to reemployment is not guaranteed either by statute or by contract, the employment relationship shall be deemed to have terminated on the ninety-first (91st) day of such leave. 
  

	2.	Except as amended hereby, the terms of the Plan are not otherwise changed and the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 

 AS ADOPTED BY THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION ON NOVEMBER 5, 2004. 
  

			
	COMPUCREDIT CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/S/ ROHIT H. KIRPALANI
		 	 Rohit H. Kirpalani
 General Counsel and
Secretary
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JUSTIN AHMAD CLARK,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 635 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justices Eakin and Wecht did not participate in the decision of this matter.**
Certification Standards Contractors & Specifiers Homeo wners Advocacy Resources 

## Search AHRI Certification Directory

Home AHRI > Articles



# AHRI, NRDC Align on Phasing Out Certain HFC Refrigerants AHRI, NRDC Align on Phasing Out Certain HFC Refrige rants February 3, 2016 Contact: Francis Dietz , Vice President, Public Affairs, AHRI Direct: 703.600.0355 Arlington, Va. — The Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration In stitute (AHRI) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) issued a joint letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in support of changing the status of certain refrigerants used in liquid chillers under the Significant New Alternati ves Policy (SNAP) program effective January 1, 2025. The two groups took this action fo llowing lengthy discussions on the importance of moving beyond high-global warming pot ential (GWP) refrigerants used in chillers and consideration of factors such as the s afety of alternatives, the continued improvement of system efficiency, reasonable produc t development timelines, and the avoidance of market migration. The effective date w as negotiated with those factors in mind. "This is another example of industry and efficiencyadvocates working together toward environmental progress, while allowing sufficient t ime and predictability for manufacturers," said AHRI President & CEO Stephen Yurek. "We are gr ateful to the members of AHRI's Liquid Chillers Product Section, who worked diligen tly to reach this agreement," Yurek added. The EPA is expected to decide in the coming months whether or not to accede to this consensus recommendation. 

## About AHRI The Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration In stitute (AHRI) is the trade association representing manufacturers of air conditioning, hea ting, commercial refrigeration, and water heating equipment. An internationally recognized ad vocate for the industry, AHRI develops standards for and certifies the performance of manyof these products. AHRI's 300+ member companies manufacture quality, efficient, an d innovative residential and commercial air conditioning, space heating, water h eating, and commercial refrigeration equipment and components for sale in North America and around the world. Visit AHRI at www.ahrinet.org. 

### Certification Standards Contractors & Specifiers Homeowners Advocacy Resources News & Events About Us Members Member Login Search Standards | 

## Page 1 of 2 AHRI

2/ 5/2016 http://www.ahrinet.org/site/A__1143/295/Modules/AHRI/Articles
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific Inc on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Stuckey Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Thomas M. Stuckey
---------------------
Thomas M. Stuckey
Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2002


                                       27
Exhibit
10.25


 


DEFERRAL AGREEMENT
WORKSHEET


 


I, Joe M. Rodgers, a Director of AMR Corporation and
American Airlines, Inc., do hereby elect to defer the receipt of meeting and
retainer fees for the year 2003 pursuant to one of the following plans (please
check one if you wish to defer 2003 meeting and retainer fees):


 


ý                                    Deferred
fees accrue interest at the prime rate in effect, from time to time, at Chase
Manhattan Bank, New York, New York.


 


or


 


o                                    The
Stock Equivalent Purchase Plan.


 


1.                                       For
how long do you want meeting and retainer fees to be deferred? Until retirement
year(s).


 


2.                                       At
the conclusion of the deferral period, how do you want the deferred funds paid
out (for example, 100% lump sum, 25% per year,
$          per month until
all funds distributed, etc.)?


 


100% lump sum


 


3.                                       In
the event of your death prior to the deferred funds being completely
distributed, who do you wish to designate as your beneficiary?


 


Helen M. Rodgers


 


	
   

  	
  /s/ Joe M. Rodgers

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Signature - Joe M. Rodgers

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  11/22/02

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date
#### § 1.469-6 Treatment of losses upon certain dispositions. [Reserved]
Amendment to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.40 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC. 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN 
 (as Effective January 1, 1997) 
 Effective as of January 1, 1997, M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Employer”) established the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”). Pursuant to
Section 13.02 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended through the amendment of the Non-Standardized Adoption Agreement and the Defined Contribution Prototype Plan as set forth below: 
 AMENDMENTS: 
 1. Section 10.03(F) of the Plan is hereby amended by
adding the following to the end thereof: 
 Effective as of January 1, 2006, Participants shall be restricted to investment in a
“Set Percentage” of qualifying Employer securities (“Employer Stock”). The Set Percentage shall be 30% of the Participant’s total account balance. If the percentage of a Participant’s investment in Employer Stock
exceeds the Set Percentage on or after the effective date of the Amendment, the Participant will not be compelled to sell Employer Stock in excess of the Set Percentage. However, the Participant may not direct any future contributions to be invested
in Employer Stock until the Participant’s investment in Employer Stock is below the Set Percentage. 
 2. A new Section 8.06(E) is
hereby added providing as follows: 
 Effective as of January 1, 2006, in order to ensure that each Participant has an investment option
in a fund other than the fund that invests primarily in Employer Stock, Participants who have elected only the MDC Stock Fund will be required to make at least one additional fund election. If no additional election is made by the Participant, the
Participant will be enrolled in the Plan’s default election fund. If the Participant account is invested in Employer Stock in excess of the Set Percentage, any further contributions will be directed to an alternate fund and not to a fund that
invests primarily in Employer Stock. 
 3. A new Section 3.03(A) is hereby added providing as follows: 
 Effective as of October 24, 2005, the 2005 discretionary matching contribution, if any, made to Participant accounts will be made in Employer Stock,
unless the portion of the eligible Participant’s account balance invested in Employer Stock is greater than 25% as of December 31, 2005. If an eligible Participant’s investment in Employer Stock is greater than 25% of the
Participant’s total account balance as of December 31, 2005, the Employer’s discretionary matching contribution, if made, will be in cash. 
 * * *
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1417

FRANCES SYPTAK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARABIAN AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-95-107-5-T) Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: January 20, 1999 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Phyllis A. Palmieri, PALMIERI & ASSOCIATES, Morganton, North Carolina, for Appellant. V. Scott Kneese, Elizabeth Mata Kroger, BRACEWELL & PATTERSON, L.L.P., Houston, Texas, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Frances Syptak, proceeding on behalf of her deceased husband, Harold G. Syptak, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1994). This case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). After an exhaustive analysis, the magistrate judge ultimately recommended that relief be denied and advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite receiving an extension of time in which to do so, Syptakdid not file his objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation until thirteen days after the expiration of the extended period. The district court struck the untimely objections from the record.The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file timely objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We grant the motion to submit the case on the briefs because the3facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGear Tooth Wear Detection AlgorithmVibration-based condition indicators continue to be developed for Health Usage Monitoring of rotorcraft gearboxes. Testing performed at NASA Glenn Research Center have shown correlations between specific condition indicators and specific types of gear wear. To speed up the detection and analysis of gear teeth, an image detection program based on the Viola-Jones algorithm was trained to automatically detect spiral bevel gear wear pitting. The detector was tested using a training set of gear wear pictures and a blind set of gear wear pictures. The detector accuracy for the training set was 75 percent while the accuracy for the blind set was 15 percent. Further improvements on the accuracy of the detector are required but preliminary results have shown its ability to automatically detect gear tooth wear. The trained detector would be used to quickly evaluate a set of gear or pinion pictures for pits, spalls, or abrasive wear. The results could then be used to correlate with vibration or oil debris data. In general, the program could be retrained to detect features of interest from pictures of a component taken over a period of time.Document ID20170005246Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDelgado, Irebert R.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 7, 2017Publication DateJuly 1, 2015Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2015-218830E-19102Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 664817.02.03.02.03.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005246.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
39582.

#### AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al. v. CAGLE.

Eberhakdt, Judge.

Where the deputy director finds that claimant injured his back on the job in July 1958, and subsequently aggravated the injuiy until a final aggravation attributable to a specific job-connected incident in July 1959, after which he was unable to continue work, his claim filed in December, 1959, is not barred by the one-year limitation in *Code*§ 114-305. It is well settled that the aggravation or acceleration of a pre-existing latent infirmity is compensable. *Pruitt v. Ocean Acc. &c. Corp.,*48 Ga. App. 730 (173 SE 238); *Employers Liability &c. Corp. v. Johnson,*62 Ga. App. 416 (2) (8 SE2d 542); *American Mut. &c. Ins. Co. v. Gunter,*74 Ga. App. 500 (2) (40 SE2d 394); *Davis v. Bibb Mfg. Co.,*75 Ga. App. 515, 518 (43 SE2d 780); *U. S. Cas. Co. v. Kelly,*78 Ga. App. 112 (50 SE2d 238) ; *Massachusetts Bonding &c. Co. v. Turk,*84 Ga. App. 547, 550 (66 SE2d 364); *Manufacturers Cas. Ins. Co. v. Peacock, 97*Ga. App. 26 (1) (101 SE2d 898). We can see no difference between aggravation of a preexisting infirmity whether incurred while working for another employer (see *Johnson,*supra), or whether congenital in nature (e.g., *Peacock,*supra), and this situation. To hold otherwise would penalize the claimant for attempting to continue working even though hurt to- some extent. The record here amply shows that the employer had full knowledge of the back condition from its first occurrence.

Plaintiff in error urges us to ignore the affirmative finding of fact by the deputy director relative to the aggravations of his first injury, or of re-injury, which finding was later approved by the full board. This we cannot do because there is *441competent evidence to support it. The dismissal of the claim by the board on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitation, being grounded upon a wrongful application of the law, was error.

Decided June 27, 1962

Rehearing denied July 27, 1962.

*Smith, Field, Ring el, Martin & Carr, Richard D. Carr, Ralph H. Hicks,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Richard W. Best, Henry Stewart,*contra.

*The order of the superior court reversing the award of the board denying compensation is affirmed. However, we dan see no necessity for a trial de novo. The matter should, instead, be remanded to the board for further proceedings, findings and award not inconsistent herewith.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Russell, J., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our reports dated March 30, 2001, included on pages F-2 and S-1 of the
2000 Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K of UroCor, Inc., into the
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-16075,
333-58013, 333-58015 and 333-58017, 333-44716, 333-44718) of UroCor, Inc.


                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 30, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5149]



[[Page 11187]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy.
    Date: March 18-19, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Embassy Suites Hotel, 1250 22nd Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Raul A. Saavedra, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC; 6001 Executive Blvd., Ste. 3208, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f6e4e4f3e0e1f7f7c5ebecebe1f6abebecedabe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a594b4b5c4f4e58586a4443444e5904444342044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 5, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-5149 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>