alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0998

_____________________________

ALPHONSO JAMES, SR.,

Appellant,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, 

Florida Department of 

Corrections,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

October 4, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Alphonso James, Sr., pro se, Appellant.

Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Department of 

Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      462
<ALLOWANCES>                                        69
<INVENTORY>                                      4,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,512
<PP&E>                                          44,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,666
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,467
<SALES>                                          2,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,186
<CGS>                                            4,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,320<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    54
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,565)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES are for R&D incurred in developing product for market
EPS-PRIMARY reflects a reverse two for three stock split and the proforma
restatement of outstanding preferred shares associated with the company's
initial public offering on July 30, 1999. In addition, $17,915 of stock
dividends issued to preferred stockholders were included in the net loss
applicable to common stockholders in calculating the EPS-PRIMARY number.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000854941
<NAME>                        Elegant Illusions
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,336,163
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  494,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,403,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,224
<PP&E>                                         2,238,129
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,052,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,658,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          154,990
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,434
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,324,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,658,683
<SALES>                                        2,165,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,165,578
<CGS>                                          620,552
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  620,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,420,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                124,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                   52,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            72,095
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   72,095
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  UCAP   Incorporated  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Dan
Moudy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Dan Moudy
-----------------------
Dan Moudy
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003




<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                       
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         5,982
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (500)
<INVENTORY>                                    7,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               27,738
<PP&E>                                         496,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (496,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,612
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       19,333
<OTHER-SE>                                     (140,612)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,333
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,559
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  329,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (90,927)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                133,400
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   42,473
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.02
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20877 USDC No. H-97-CV-2335

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RUBEN DARIO SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

--------------------- July 2, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Ruben Dario Sanchez, federal prisoner #60156-079, seeks to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. This court must examine the basis of its subject-matter jurisdiction on its own motion if
necessary. Giannakos v. M/V BRAVO TRADER , 762 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1985). Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), a prisoner seeking to file a second or successive § 2255 motion in the district court must apply for leave to do so from this court. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A),O R D E R No. 97-20877 - 2 - 2255. Because Sanchez had not obtained prior permission from this court to file his successive § 2255 motion, the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain his successive § 2255 motion. See id. A certificate of appealability is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for the entry of a judgment dismissing Sanchez’s successive § 2255 motion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                            VERSO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                            1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
             ADOPTED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS OF VERSO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                              ON NOVEMBER 16, 2001

         NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Verso Technologies, Inc. 1999
Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is amended as of November 16, 2001, by
deleting the first sentence of Section 4.1 thereof in its entirety and
substituting the following in lieu thereof:

                  "Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.5 of the Plan,
                  the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that will be
                  available for issuance under the Plan will be 15,000,000
                  shares of Common Stock less the number of shares of Common
                  Stock issued pursuant to the Prior Plans.";

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Plan is amended as of November 16, 2001, by
deleting Section 4.4 thereof in its entirety and substituting the following in
lieu thereof:

         "4.4     SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUED PURSUANT TO INCENTIVE STOCK
                  OPTIONS. Subject to Section 4.5, the maximum number of shares
                  of Common Stock that may be issued by Options intended to be
                  Incentive Stock Options pursuant to the Plan shall be
                  15,000,000 less the number of shares of Common Stock issued
                  pursuant to the Prior Plans."; and

         RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Plan is amended as of November 16, 2001, by
deleting Section 6.2 thereof in its entirety and substituting the following in
lieu thereof:

         "6.2     EXERCISE PRICE. The per share price to be paid by a
                  Participant upon exercise of an Option will be determined by
                  the Committee in its discretion at the time of the Option
                  grant, provided that price will not be less than 100% of the
                  Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the date of
                  grant with respect to an Incentive Stock Option (110% of the
                  Fair Market Value if, at the time the Incentive Stock Option
                  is granted, the Participant owns, or indirectly, more than 10%
                  of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of
                  the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation of the
                  Company)."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       9,222,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  980,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,550
<INVENTORY>                                  2,758,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,016,055
<PP&E>                                       6,911,193
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,725,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,405,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,880,259
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        41,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,425,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,405,074
<SALES>                                      6,440,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,008,511
<CGS>                                        5,146,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,258,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,481,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             284,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (731,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (733,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (733,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 147

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 27 (legislative day, MARCH 26), 1996

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the fifteenth

annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 147 RDS

1 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL

2 PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE.

3 The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxil4 iary shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the fif5 teenth annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service,

6 on the Capitol grounds on May 15, 1996, or on such other

7 date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and

8 the President pro tempore of the Senate may jointly des9 ignate, in order to honor the 155 law enforcement officers

10 who died in the line of duty during 1995.

11 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized to be con13 ducted on the Capitol grounds under section 1 shall be

14 free of admission charge to the public and arranged not

15 to interfere with the needs of Congress, under conditions

16 to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the

17 Capitol Police Board.

18 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The National

19 Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall assume

20 full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident

21 to all activities associated with the event.

22 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

23 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the

24 approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the National Fra25 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary are authorized to

26 erect upon the Capitol grounds such stage, sound amplifi-
3

HCON 147 RDS

1 cation devices, and other related structures and equip2 ment, as may be required for the event authorized to be

3 conducted on the Capitol grounds under section 1.

4 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

5 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are authorized

6 to make any such additional arrangements as may be re7 quired to carry out the event.

Passed the House of Representatives March 26,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
§ 1.243-1 Deduction for dividends received by corporations. ( a ) ( 1 ) A corporation is allowed a deduction under section 243 for dividends received from a domestic corporation which is subject to taxation under Chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.
( 2 ) Except as provided in section 243(c) and in section 246, the deduction is: ( i ) For the taxable year, an amount equal to 85 percent of the dividends received from such domestic corporations during the taxable year (other than dividends to which subdivision (ii) or (iii) of this subparagraph applies).
( ii ) For a taxable year beginning after September 2, 1958, an amount equal to 100 percent of the dividends received from such domestic corporations if at the time of receipt of such dividends the recipient corporation is a Federal licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. ch. 14B). However, to claim the deduction provided by section 243(a)(2) the company must file with its return a statement that it was a Federal licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 at the time of the receipt of the dividends.
( iii ) For a taxable year ending after December 31, 1963, an amount equal to 100 percent of the dividends received which are *qualifying dividends,* as defined in section 243(b) and § 1.243-4.
( 3 ) To determine the amount of the distribution to a recipient corporation and the amount of the dividend, see §§ 1.301-1 and 1.316-1.
( b ) For limitation on the dividends received deduction, see section 246 and the regulations thereunder.
[T.D. 6992, 34 FR 817, Jan. 18, 1969]
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-1 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-2 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-3 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-4 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-5 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-6 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-7 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-8 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-9 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-10 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-11 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-12 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-13 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-14 
Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 

Appendix R-15
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 237 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 237

                 To memorialize DEA agent Richard Fass.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 July 1 (legislative day, June 7), 1994

  Mr. DeConcini (for himself and Mr. D'Amato) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                 To memorialize DEA agent Richard Fass.

Whereas Richard Fass, a Drug Enforcement Administration agent, was slain in the 
        line of duty in Phoenix, Arizona, last night;
Whereas, to date, 26 DEA agents have been killed in the line of duty;
Whereas over 13,000 names have been placed on the Law Enforcement Memorial 
        honoring law enforcement officers from all across the country who have 
        been killed in the line of duty;
Whereas the entire law enforcement family shares in the pain and the grief when 
        a fellow officer is lost;
Whereas it helps to ease the pain and suffering when fellow officers are present 
        to share the loss;
Whereas current law permits active military officers to travel in an official 
        capacity to funerals of fellow colleagues killed in the line of duty;
Whereas the nation mourns the loss of this fine, young, and dedicated law 
        enforcement officer; and
Whereas the Senate sends its condolences to the family of Richard Fass: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Administration should submit legislation to the 
Congress which authorizes Federal law enforcement officers to be 
excused from duty without loss or reduction in pay, leave, or credit 
for service, to attend the funeral of a fellow Federal law enforcement 
officer who was killed in the line of duty and, in the interim, the 
Attorney General should exercise her authority to permit DEA personnel 
to attend the funeral or related services of agent Richard Fass.
                                 <all>
```
No. 07

- 16

- 00085

- CV

In the Interest of S.D., L.D., A.D., and J.E., Children § § § § From the 364th District Court of Lubbock County July 29, 2016 Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 29, 2016 , it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the trial c ourt granting the termin ation of appellant J.D.’s parental rights be affirmed. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that appellant Jason E. ’ s a ppeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis , no costs beyond those that have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o