3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 1 OF 24

Final Report

Analysis of PFOA, PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Aqueous Samples from 

3M Decatur, Alabama: Groundwater Treatment Plant GAC System –

November 2013

Laboratory Request Number: ISO13-07-10

Method Requirement: 3M Method ETS-8-044.1

Report Date – Date of Last Signature

Testing Laboratory

3M EHS&S Operations

3M Environmental Laboratory

Building 260-5N-17

Maplewood, MN 55144-1000

Requester 

Gary Hohenstein

3M Building 224-5W-03

Saint Paul, MN 55144-1000

Phone: (651) 737-3570

The testing reported herein meet the requirements of ANSI/ISO/IEC 17025:2005 

“General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories”, in 

accordance with the A2LA Testing Certificate # 2052.01. Additionally, the laboratory’s 

quality system has been audited and was determined to be in conformance with the 

EPA GLPs (40 CFR 792) by an independent A2LA assessment.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 2 OF 24

3M Environmental Laboratory

3M Environmental Laboratory Technical Director: William K. Reagen, Ph.D.

3M Principal Analytical Investigator: Susan Wolf

Report Author: Chelsie Grochow

Analytical Report ISO13-07-10

3M Decatur Groundwater Treatment Plant System; November 2013 Sampling 

Report Date: Date of Last Signature

1 Introduction/Summary 

The 3M Environmental Laboratory analyzed water samples from the groundwater treatment plant GAC 

system at the 3M Decatur, AL facility. Water samples were collected by Weston Solutions personnel 

on November 18, 2013. Samples were returned to the 3M Environmental Laboratory for analysis of 

Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHS),

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) under laboratory project number ISO13-07-10. Analysis of the 

samples was completed as specified under 3M Environmental Laboratory General Project Outline 

(GPO) number GPO11-1006.

The 3M Environmental Laboratory provided sample containers for seven sampling locations; ACI, 

ACM2, ACE, WW8R, WW9R, WW10R, and WW11R. The sample set consisted of a field sample, field 

sample duplicate and a field matrix spike. Each empty container was marked with a “fill to here” line 

that corresponded to a final volume of 200 mL. Containers reserved for field matrix spikes were 

fortified with an appropriate matrix spike solution containing all analytes prior to being sent to the field 

for sample collection. Sample bottles for sampling locations ACM2 and ACE, along with the Trip Blank 

sample and low spike, were fortified with internal standards and surrogates prior to being sent to the 

field for sample collection. 

Samples were prepared and analyzed by method ETS-8-044.1 “Method of Analysis for the 

Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis”. Select 

internal standards were used to aid in the data quality objectives. 

Table 1 summarizes the sample results using the analytical method identified above. All results for 

quality control samples prepared and analyzed with the samples will be reported and discussed 

elsewhere in this report.

The testing reported herein meet the requirements of ANSI/ISO/IEC 17025:2005 “General 

Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories”, in 

accordance with the A2LA Testing Certificate # 2052.01. Additionally, the laboratory’s 

quality system has been audited and was determined to be in conformance with the EPA 

GLPs (40 CFR 792) by an independent A2LA assessment.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 3 OF 24

Table 1. Sample Results Summary

3M LIMS ID Sample Description

PFOA 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

PFBS 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

PFHS 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

PFOS 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

ISO13-07-10-001 DAL-GW-ACI; Sample 2190 1100 1320 2260

ISO13-07-10-002 DAL-GW-ACI; Sample Dup 2190 1090 1340 2220

Average 2190 (1) 1100 (1) 1330 (1) 2240 (1)

%RPD Sample/Sample Dup 0.0 0.91 1.5 1.8

ISO13-07-10-004 DAL-GW-ACM2; Sample 0.0539 1130 0.0728 0.206

ISO13-07-10-005 DAL-GW-ACM2; Sample Dup 0.0527 1110 0.0670 0.198

Average 0.0533 (2) 1120 (1) 0.0699 (2) 0.202 (2)

%RPD Sample/Sample Dup 2.3 1.8 8.3 4.0

ISO13-07-10-007 DAL-GW-ACE; Sample 0.511 0.620 0.401 0.0979

ISO13-07-10-008 DAL-GW-ACE; Sample Dup 0.445 0.563 0.331 0.0472

Average 0.478 (2) 0.592 (2) 0.366 (2) 0.0726 (2)

%RPD Sample/Sample Dup 14 9.6 19 70 (3)

ISO13-07-10-010 DAL-GW-WW8R; Sample 3060 363 1440 4790

ISO13-07-10-011 DAL-GW-WW8R; Sample Dup 3010 360 1440 4710

Average 3040 (1) 362 (1) 1440 (1) 4750 (1)

%RPD Sample/Sample Dup 1.6 0.83 0.0 1.7

ISO13-07-10-013 DAL-GW-WW9R; Sample 2910 301 1300 4430

ISO13-07-10-014 DAL-GW-WW9R; Sample Dup 2980 309 1370 4640

Average 2950 (1) 305 (1) 1340 (1) 4540 (1)

%RPD Sample/Sample Dup 2.4 2.6 5.2 4.6

ISO13-07-10-019 DAL-GW-WW10R; Sample 2410 301 1120 3940

ISO13-07-10-020 DAL-GW-WW10R; Sample Dup 2380 304 1120 3840

Average 2400 (1) 303 (1) 1120 (1) 3890 (1)

%RPD Sample/Sample Dup 1.3 0.99 0.0 2.6

ISO13-07-10-022 DAL-GW-WW11R; Sample 1300 286 673 1790

ISO13-07-10-023 DAL-GW-WW11R; Sample Dup 1330 288 687 1900

Average 1320 (1) 287 (1) 680 (1) 1850 (1)

%RPD Sample/Sample Dup 2.3 0.70 2.1 5.9

NA = Not Applicable

(1) Reported results were prepared and analyzed by ETS-8-044.1 using external standard calibration. The analytical method 

uncertainties associated with the reported results are as follows: PFOA ±17%, PFBS ±18%, PFHS ±15%, and PFOS ±21%.

(2) Reported results were prepared and analyzed by ETS-8-044.1 using internal standard calibration. The analytical method 

uncertainties associated with the reported results are as follows: PFOA ±15%, PFBS ±16%, PFHS ±20%, and PFOS ±17%.

(3) Sample/sample duplicate RPD did not meet acceptance criteria of ≤20%.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 4 OF 24

2 Methods - Analytical and Preparatory

2.1 Methods

Analysis was completed using 3M Environmental Laboratory Method ETS-8-044.1 “Method of Analysis 

for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis”.

Table 2. Target Analytes

Target Analytes Acronym

Reference 

Material Structure

Perfluorooctanoic Acid (C8 Acid) PFOA Linear + Branched

Perfluorobutanesulfonate (C4 Sulfonate ) PFBS Linear

Perfluorohexanesulfonate (C6 Sulfonate) PFHS Linear

Perfluorooctanesulfonate (C8 Sulfonate) PFOS Linear + Branched

2.2 Sample Collection

Samples were collected on November 18, 2013 in NalgeneTM (high-density polyethylene) bottles 

prepared at the 3M Environmental Laboratory. Prior to sample collection, bottles designated for field 

matrix spikes were spiked in the laboratory with a known volume of an appropriate matrix spiking 

solution containing PFOA, PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS. Sample bottles for sampling locations ACM2 and 

ACE, along with the Trip Blank sample and low spike, were fortified with a mixture of mass-labeled 

internal standards at a nominal concentration of 1 ng/mL and a mixture of surrogate recovery standards 

at a nominal concentration of 0.1 ng/mL. Collected sample bottles were received by the laboratory at 

ambient conditions on November 25, 2013.

2.3 Sample Preparation

All samples were diluted with methanol and analyzed for all analytes. Samples diluted 1:10 were 

prepared by removing a 1 mL aliquot of the well mixed sample and adding 8.9 mL of methanol and 0.1 

mL of a surrogate spiking solution. The 1:100 dilutions were prepared by removing a 0.1 mL aliquot of 

the well mixed sample and adding 9.8 mL of methanol and 0.1 mL of a surrogate spiking solution. 

Prepared samples were analyzed by external standard calibration. Further dilution may have been 

applied by using a lower injection volume on the instrument. 

The ACE and ACM2 sample sets and the Trip Blank sample were prepared and analyzed for all 

analytes by transferring an aliquot of the well mixed sample into an autovial. Prepared samples were 

analyzed by internal standard calibration. 

During the preparation of the laboratory control samples for internal standard calibration, an aliquot of a 

separate internal standard spiking solution was added to the laboratory control samples (nominal 

concentration of 1 ng/mL). The sample bottles for ACE, ACM2, and Trip Blank were spiked with an 

internal standard mix at a nominal concentration of 1 ng/mL prior to being sent to the field for sample 

collection. The laboratory control samples were analyzed in the same manner as the samples. 

2.4 Analysis

All samples and quality control samples were analyzed for four target analytes using high performance 

liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). Pertinent instrument parameters, 

the liquid chromatography gradient program, and the specific mass transitions analyzed are described 

in the tables below.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 5 OF 24

Due to the nature of the sample, the wide range of concentrations found in the sample, and the 

environmental occurrence of multiple isomers of the laboratory’s analytes of interest, the software used 

for processing the analytical results is not able to consistently integrate the analytical peak, manual 

integration of the analytical peak is necessary. All manual integrations are performed following the 

procedures outlined in method ETS-12-010. The consistency of the laboratory’s integration is ensured 

through the training of laboratory personnel, the peer review process required for all manual 

integrations, the review of manual integrations by the QAU, and where necessary the review of manual 

integrations by laboratory management.

Table 3. Instrument Parameters.

Instrument Name ETS Kirk

Analysis Dates

12/12/13 – external standard calibration

12/13/13 – internal standard calibration 

Analytical Method ETS-8-044.1

Liquid Chromatograph Agilent 1260

Guard column Betasil C18 (4.6 mm X 100 mm), 5 μ

Analytical column Betasil C18 (4.6 mm X 100 mm), 5 μ

Injection Volume 2, 5, or 20 μL

Mass Spectrometer Applied Biosystems TripleQuad 5500

Ion Source Turbo Spray

Polarity Negative

Software Analyst 1.6.1

Table 4. Liquid Chromatography Gradient Program.

Step 

Number

Total Time 

(min)

Flow Rate 

(μL/min)

Percent A

(2 mM ammonium acetate)

Percent B

(Methanol)

0 0.00 750 90.0 10.0

1 0.50 750 90.0 10.0

2 4.00 750 70.0 30.0

3 6.00 750 70.0 30.0

4 11.0 750 20.0 80.0

5 13.0 750 20.0 80.0

6 13.5 750 10.0 90.0

7 16.0 750 10.0 90.0

8 16.5 750 90.0 10.0

9 19.0 750 90.0 10.0
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 6 OF 24

Table 5. Mass Transitions.

Analyte

Mass Transition

Q1/Q3

Internal Standard (1) Mass Transition

Q1/Q3

PFOA

413/369

[

13 413/219 C8]PFOA 421/376

413/169

PFBS

299/80

[

18

O2]PFBS 303/84

299/99

PFHS

399/99

[

13C3]PFHS 402/80

399/80

PFOS

499/99

[

13 499/80 C8]PFOS 507/80

499/130

[

13C4]PFOA surrogate 417/372 [13C8]PFOA 421/376

[

13C4]PFOS surrogate 503/80 [13C8]PFOS 507/80

Dwell time was 20 msec for each transition. The individual transitions were summed to produce a “total ion chromatogram” 

(TIC), which was used for quantitation. 

(1) Internal standards were used for the analysis on 12/13/13.

3 Data Analysis

3.1 Calibration

External Standard Calibration Analysis on 12/12/13: Samples were analyzed against an external 

standard calibration curve. Calibration standards were prepared by spiking known amounts of the 

stock solution containing the target analytes into 90:10 methanol: Milli-Q laboratory water. A total of 

eleven spiked standards ranging from 0.02 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL (nominal) were analyzed. The 

standards also contained the surrogates at concentrations ranging from 0.02 ng/mL to 25 ng/mL 

nominal. A quadratic, 1/x weighted, calibration curve of the standard peak area counts was used to fit 

the data for each analyte. The data were not forced through zero during the fitting process. Calculating 

the standard concentrations using the peak area counts and the resultant calibration curve confirmed 

accuracy of each curve point. 

Internal Standard Calibration Analysis on 12/13/13: Samples were analyzed against a matrix-matched 

stable isotope internal standard calibration curve. Calibration standards were prepared by spiking 

known amounts of stock solutions into laboratory prepared reagent water. The calibration standards 

contained an internal standard mix at a nominal concentration of 1 ng/mL. A total of thirteen calibration 

standards ranging from 0.025 ng/mL to 25 ng/mL (nominal) were analyzed with the prepared samples. 

Of these thirteen calibration standards, eleven contained the surrogates at concentrations ranging from 

0.025 ng/mL to 10 ng/mL nominal. A quadratic, 1/x weighted, calibration curve of the ratio of the 

standard peak area counts over the internal standard peak area counts was used to fit the data for 

each analyte. The data were not forced through zero during the fitting process. Calculating the 

standard concentrations using the peak area ratios and the resultant calibration curve confirmed

accuracy of each curve point. 

For each calibration curve, the reference standards of PFOA and PFOS used to prepare the calibration 

standards consisted of both linear and branched isomers. Each curve point was quantitated using the 

overall calibration curve and reviewed for accuracy. Method calibration accuracy requirements of 

100±25% (100±30% for the lowest curve point) were met for all analytes. The correlation coefficient r 

was greater than 0.995 for all analytes.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 7 OF 24

3.2 System Suitability

A calibration standard was analyzed four times at the beginning of the analytical sequence to 

demonstrate overall system suitability. The acceptance criteria for system suitability samples is less 

than or equal to 5% relative standard deviation (RSD) for peak area/ratio and retention time criteria of 

less than or equal to 2% RSD. These criteria were met for all analytes.

3.3 Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

The LOQ as defined in method ETS-8-044.1 is the lowest non-zero calibration standard in the curve 

that meets linearity and accuracy requirements and for which the area counts are at least twice those of 

the appropriate blanks. The LOQs associated with the sample analysis are listed in Table 6.

Table 6. LOQ

Analyte Calibration LOQ, ng/mL 

PFOA Internal standard 0.0240

PFBS Internal standard 0.0250

PFHS Internal standard 0.0400

PFOS Internal standard 0.0232

PFOA External standard 0.0958 (1)

PFBS External standard 0.0200 (1)

PFHS External standard 0.0200 (1)

PFOS External standard 0.0185 (1)

(1) The dilution factor was not applied to the LOQ.

3.4 Continuing Calibration 

During the course of the analytical sequence, several continuing calibration verification samples 

(CCVs) were analyzed to confirm that the instrument response and the initial calibration curve were still 

in control. The method acceptance criteria of 100% ± 25% was met for all analytes.

3.5 Blanks

Two types of blanks were prepared and analyzed with the samples: method blanks/solvent blanks and 

field/trip blanks. Each blank result was reviewed and used to evaluate method performance to 

determine the LOQ for each analyte.

3.6 Lab Control Spikes (LCSs) 

Low, mid, and high lab control spikes were prepared for the target analytes and analyzed in triplicate, 

while only low and high lab control spikes were prepared for the surrogates. LCSs were prepared by 

spiking known amounts of the analytes into either 10 mL of laboratory-prepared matrix matched water 

or 1 mL of Milli-Q water to produce the desired concentration. When applicable, the LCSs were then 

diluted with methanol in the same manner as the samples. Method ETS-8-044.1 states that the 

average recovery of LCSs at each spiking level be within 80%-120% with a RSD ≤20%. All LCS 

samples met method accuracy criteria.

All LCSs were used in the determination of the analytical method uncertainty in section 3.7. 

The following calculations were used to generate data in Table 7.

* 100%

Spike Concentration

Calculated Concentration LCSPercent Recovery =

* 100%

average LCS recovery

standard deviation LCS replicates LCS% RSD =
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 8 OF 24

Table 7. Lab Control Spike Results.

ETS-8-044.1

External Standard 

Calibration

Analyzed 12/12/13 PFOA (Linear + Branched) PFOA surrogate

Lab ID

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

LCS-131212-1 0.191 0.194 102 0.199 0.223 112

LCS-131212-2 0.191 0.188 98.4 0.199 0.214 108

LCS-131212-3 0.191 0.184 96.3 0.199 0.214 107

Average ± %RSD 98.9% ± 2.9% 109% ± 2.4%

LCS-131212-4 4.74 5.37 113 4.94 5.22 106

LCS-131212-5 4.74 5.32 112 4.94 5.23 106

LCS-131212-6 4.74 5.48 116 4.94 5.11 104

Average ± %RSD 114% ± 1.8% 105% ± 1.1%

LCS-131212-7 38.2 41.5 109

LCS-131212-8 38.2 38.1 99.6

LCS-131212-9 38.2 38.1 99.7

Average ± %RSD 103% ± 5.2%

ETS-8-044.1

External Standard 

Calibration

Analyzed 12/12/13 PFBS PFHS

Lab ID

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

LCS-131212-1 0.199 0.219 110 0.199 0.207 104

LCS-131212-2 0.199 0.220 110 0.199 0.202 102

LCS-131212-3 0.199 0.214 108 0.199 0.204 102

Average ± %RSD 109% ± 1.1% 103% ± 1.1%

LCS-131212-4 4.95 5.70 115 4.95 5.46 110

LCS-131212-5 4.95 5.76 116 4.95 5.41 109

LCS-131212-6 4.95 5.78 117 4.95 5.56 112

Average ± %RSD 116% ± 0.86% 110% ± 1.4%

LCS-131212-7 39.8 41.5 104 39.8 >ULOQ NA

LCS-131212-8 39.8 40.6 102 39.8 >ULOQ NA

LCS-131212-9 39.8 40.0 100 39.8 >ULOQ NA

Average ± %RSD 102% ± 2.0% NA

>ULOQ = analyte concentration exceeded upper limit of quantitation

NA = Not Applicable
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 9 OF 24

Table 7 continued. Lab Control Spike Results.

ETS-8-044.1

External Standard 

Calibration

Analyzed 12/12/13 PFOS (Linear + Branched) PFOS surrogate

Lab ID

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

LCS-131212-1 0.185 0.204 110 0.190 0.215 113

LCS-131212-2 0.185 0.197 107 0.190 0.208 109

LCS-131212-3 0.185 0.197 107 0.190 0.207 109

Average ± %RSD 108% ± 1.6% 110% ± 2.1%

LCS-131212-4 4.59 5.37 117 4.73 5.11 108

LCS-131212-5 4.59 5.34 116 4.73 5.19 110

LCS-131212-6 4.59 5.38 117 4.73 5.01 106

Average ± %RSD 117% ± 0.49% 108% ± 1.9% 

LCS-131212-7 36.9 39.3 106

LCS-131212-8 36.9 36.1 97.9

LCS-131212-9 36.9 36.5 98.8

Average ± %RSD 101% ± 4.4%

ETS-8-044.1

Internal Standard 

Calibration

Analyzed 12/13/13 PFOA (Linear + Branched) PFOA surrogate

Lab ID

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

LCS-131213-1 0.190 0.199 105 0.198 0.232 117

LCS-131213-2 0.190 0.190 100 0.198 0.225 114

LCS-131213-3 0.190 0.200 105 0.198 0.229 116

Average ± %RSD 103% ± 2.8% 116% ± 1.3%

LCS-131213-4 1.90 2.15 113 1.98 2.32 117

LCS-131213-5 1.90 2.06 109 1.98 2.18 110

LCS-131213-6 1.90 2.04 107 1.98 2.28 115

Average ± %RSD 110% ± 2.8% 114% ± 3.2%

LCS-131213-7 19.0 20.7 109

LCS-131213-8 19.0 20.2 106

LCS-131213-9 19.0 19.4 102

Average ± %RSD 106% ± 3.3%
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 10 OF 24

Table 7 continued. Lab Control Spike Results.

ETS-8-044.1

Internal Standard 

Calibration

Analyzed 12/13/13 PFBS PFHS

Lab ID

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

LCS-131213-1 0.198 0.213 108 0.198 0.205 103

LCS-131213-2 0.198 0.206 104 0.198 0.198 100

LCS-131213-3 0.198 0.218 110 0.198 0.208 105

Average ± %RSD 107% ± 2.9% 103% ± 2.4%

LCS-131213-4 1.98 2.25 114 1.98 2.34 118

LCS-131213-5 1.98 2.24 113 1.98 2.29 116

LCS-131213-6 1.98 2.25 114 1.98 2.35 119

Average ± %RSD 114% ± 0.51% 118% ± 1.3%

LCS-131213-7 19.9 21.6 108 19.9 21.7 109

LCS-131213-8 19.9 21.0 106 19.9 21.6 108

LCS-131213-9 19.9 20.7 104 19.9 20.8 105

Average ± %RSD 106% ± 1.9% 107% ± 1.9%

ETS-8-044.1

Internal Standard 

Calibration

Analyzed 12/13/13 PFOS (Linear + Branched) PFOS surrogate

Lab ID

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL)

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

LCS-131213-1 0.184 0.203 111 0.189 0.216 114

LCS-131213-2 0.184 0.195 106 0.189 0.209 110

LCS-131213-3 0.184 0.206 112 0.189 0.219 116

Average ± %RSD 110% ± 2.9% 113% ± 2.7%

LCS-131213-4 1.84 2.15 117 1.89 2.15 114

LCS-131213-5 1.84 2.11 114 1.89 2.08 110

LCS-131213-6 1.84 2.11 115 1.89 2.16 114

Average ± %RSD 115% ± 1.3% 113% ± 2.0% 

LCS-131213-7 18.4 21.7 118

LCS-131213-8 18.4 21.1 115

LCS-131213-9 18.4 20.4 111

Average ± %RSD 115% ± 3.1%
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 11 OF 24

3.7 Analytical Method Uncertainty

Analytical uncertainty is based on historical QC data that is control charted and used to evaluate 

method accuracy and precision. The method uncertainty is calculated following ETS-12-012.2. The 

standard deviation is calculated for the set of accuracy results (in %) obtained for the QC samples. The 

expanded uncertainty is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation by a factor of 2, which 

corresponds to a confidence level of 95%.

Table 8. Analytical Method Uncertainty.

Analyte Calibration Method Standard Deviation (%) Method Uncertainty

PFOA External Standard 8.37 ±17%

PFBS External Standard 8.78 ±18%

PFHS External Standard 7.69 ±15%

PFOS External Standard 10.4 ±21%

PFOA Internal Standard 7.68 ±15%

PFBS Internal Standard 7.99 ±16%

PFHS Internal Standard 9.94 ±20%

PFOS Internal Standard 8.42 ±17%

3.8 Field Matrix Spikes (FMS)

A field matrix spike was collected at each sampling point to verify that the analytical method is 

applicable to the collected matrix. Field matrix spikes are generated by adding a measured volume of 

field sample to a container spiked by the laboratory with the target analytes prior to shipping sample 

containers for sample collection. Field matrix spike recoveries within method acceptance criteria of 

100±30% confirm that “unknown” components in the sample matrix do not significantly interfere with 

the extraction and analysis of the analytes of interest. The standards used for the preparation of the 

field matrix spiking solutions contained reference materials comprised of both linear and branched 

isomers for PFOA and PFOS. Field matrix spikes are presented in section 4 of this report. 

*100%

Spike Concentraton

(Sample Concentration of FMS Average Concentration:FieldSample & FieldSample Dup.) FMS Recovery − =

Table 9. Field Matrix Spike Concentrations.

Final Concentration (ng/mL)

Location Description PFOA PFBS PFHS PFOS

ACI Field Matrix Spike 2480 2500 2510 2500

ACM2 Field Matrix Spike 4.96 5.00 5.00 4.99

ACE Field Matrix Spike 4.96 5.00 5.00 4.99

WW8R, WW9R, 

WW10R, WW11R Field Matrix Spike 2480 2500 2510 2500

Trip Blank

Low Field Matrix Spike 4.96 5.00 5.00 4.99

High Field Matrix Spike 2480 2500 2510 2500
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 12 OF 24

4 Data Summary and Discussion

The tables below summarize the sample results and field matrix spike recoveries for the seven

locations as well as the Trip Blank. Each table provides the average concentration and the relative 

percent difference (%RPD) of the sample and sample duplicate. Results and average values are 

rounded to three significant figures. Relative percent difference (%RPD) values are rounded to two 

significant figures. Because of rounding, values may vary slightly from those listed in the raw data. 

Field matrix spikes meeting the method acceptance criteria of ±30%, demonstrate that the method is 

appropriate for the given matrix. 

All field matrix spike samples and surrogate recovery standards met method acceptance criteria except 

where noted below.

DAL-GW-ACM2; the FMS sample (5 ng/mL) was not appropriate for PFBS; however, the surrogate 

recovery standard 13C4-PFOS met method acceptance criteria. No additional QC samples were 

prepared. 
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 13 OF 24

Table 10. DAL GW ACI 131118 (1)

PFOA PFBS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-001 DAL-GW-ACI-0-131118 2190 NA 1100 NA

ISO13-07-10-002 DAL-GW-ACI-DB-131118 2190 NA 1090 NA

ISO13-07-10-003 DAL-GW-ACI-FMS-131118 4670 100 3440 93.6

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 2190 ng/mL ± 0.0% 1100 ng/mL ± 0.91%

PFHS PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-001 DAL-GW-ACI-0-131118 1320 NA 2260 NA

ISO13-07-10-002 DAL-GW-ACI-DB-131118 1340 NA 2220 NA

ISO13-07-10-003 DAL-GW-ACI-FMS-131118 3840 100 4700 98.4

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 1330 ng/mL ± 1.5% 2240 ng/mL ± 1.8% 

13C4-PFOA 13C4-PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description %Recovery %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-001 DAL-GW-ACI-0-131118 107 108

ISO13-07-10-002 DAL-GW-ACI-DB-131118 107 109

ISO13-07-10-003 DAL-GW-ACI-FMS-131118 111 112

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RSD 108% ± 2.1% 110% ± 1.9%

NA = Not Applicable

(1) Samples were analyzed by external standard calibration. The surrogate recovery standards 13C4-PFOA and 13C4-PFOS were 

added to the samples during sample preparation.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 14 OF 24

Table 11. DAL GW ACM2 131118

PFOA (1) PFBS (2)

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-004 DAL-GW-ACM2-0-131118 0.0539 NA 1130 NA

ISO13-07-10-005 DAL-GW-ACM2-DB-131118 0.0527 NA 1110 NA

ISO13-07-10-006 DAL-GW-ACM2-FMS-131118 4.88 97.3 1120 NC

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 0.0533 ng/mL ± 2.3% 1120 ng/mL ± 1.8%

PFHS (1) PFOS (1)

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-004 DAL-GW-ACM2-0-131118 0.0728 NA 0.206 NA

ISO13-07-10-005 DAL-GW-ACM2-DB-131118 0.0670 NA 0.198 NA

ISO13-07-10-006 DAL-GW-ACM2-FMS-131118 5.30 105 5.41 104

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 0.0699 ng/mL ± 8.3% 0.202 ng/mL ± 4.0%

13C4-PFOA (1) 13C4-PFOS (1)

3M LIMS ID Description %Recovery %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-004 DAL-GW-ACM2-0-131118 105 106

ISO13-07-10-005 DAL-GW-ACM2-DB-131118 110 108

ISO13-07-10-006 DAL-GW-ACM2-FMS-131118 105 106

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RSD 107% ± 2.7% 107% ± 1.1%

NA = Not Applicable

NC = Not Calculated; Spike level was less than 0.5x the endogenous sample concentration.

(1) Samples were analyzed by internal standard calibration.

(2) Samples were analyzed by external standard calibration. 
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 15 OF 24

Table 12. DAL GW ACE 131118 (1)

PFOA PFBS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-007 DAL-GW-ACE-0-131118 0.511 NA 0.620 NA

ISO13-07-10-008 DAL-GW-ACE-DB-131118 0.445 NA 0.563 NA

ISO13-07-10-009 DAL-GW-ACE-FMS-131118 5.37 98.6 5.56 99.4

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 0.478 ng/mL ± 14% 0.592 ng/mL ± 9.6%

PFHS PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-007 DAL-GW-ACE-0-131118 0.401 NA 0.0979 NA

ISO13-07-10-008 DAL-GW-ACE-DB-131118 0.331 NA 0.0472 NA

ISO13-07-10-009 DAL-GW-ACE-FMS-131118 5.58 104 5.13 101

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 0.366 ng/mL ± 19% 0.0726 ng/mL ± 70% (2)

13C4-PFOA 13C4-PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description %Recovery %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-007 DAL-GW-ACE-0-131118 106 104

ISO13-07-10-008 DAL-GW-ACE-DB-131118 105 105

ISO13-07-10-009 DAL-GW-ACE-FMS-131118 109 106

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RSD 107% ± 1.9% 105% ± 0.95%

NA = Not Applicable

(1) Samples were analyzed by internal standard calibration.

(2) Sample/sample duplicate RPD did not meet acceptance criteria of ≤20%.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 16 OF 24

Table 13. DAL GW WW8R 131118 (1)

PFOA PFBS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-010 DAL-GW-WW8R-0-131118 3060 NA 363 NA

ISO13-07-10-011 DAL-GW-WW8R-DB-131118 3010 NA 360 NA

ISO13-07-10-012 DAL-GW-WW8R-FMS-131118 5130 84.3 2790 97.1

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 3040 ng/mL ± 1.6% 362 ng/mL ± 0.83%

PFHS PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-010 DAL-GW-WW8R-0-131118 1440 NA 4790 NA

ISO13-07-10-011 DAL-GW-WW8R-DB-131118 1440 NA 4710 NA

ISO13-07-10-012 DAL-GW-WW8R-FMS-131118 3960 100 7360 104

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 1440 ng/mL ± 0.0% 4750 ng/mL ± 1.7%

13C4-PFOA 13C4-PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description %Recovery %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-010 DAL-GW-WW8R-0-131118 101 111

ISO13-07-10-011 DAL-GW-WW8R-DB-131118 96.6 109

ISO13-07-10-012 DAL-GW-WW8R-FMS-131118 97.3 109

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RSD 98.3% ± 2.4% 110% ± 1.0%

NA = Not Applicable

(1) Samples were analyzed by external standard calibration. The surrogate recovery standards 13C4-PFOA and 13C4-PFOS were 

added to the samples during sample preparation.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 17 OF 24

Table 14. DAL GW WW9R 131118 (1)

PFOA PFBS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-013 DAL-GW-WW9R-0-131118 2910 NA 301 NA

ISO13-07-10-014 DAL-GW-WW9R-DB-131118 2980 NA 309 NA

ISO13-07-10-015 DAL-GW-WW9R-FMS-131118 5050 84.7 2750 97.8

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 2950 ng/mL ± 2.4% 305 ng/mL ± 2.6%

PFHS PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-013 DAL-GW-WW9R-0-131118 1300 NA 4430 NA

ISO13-07-10-014 DAL-GW-WW9R-DB-131118 1370 NA 4640 NA

ISO13-07-10-015 DAL-GW-WW9R-FMS-131118 3940 104 7240 108

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 1340 ng/mL ± 5.2% 4540 ng/mL ± 4.6%

13C4-PFOA 13C4-PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description %Recovery %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-013 DAL-GW-WW9R-0-131118 98.4 110

ISO13-07-10-014 DAL-GW-WW9R-DB-131118 98.7 112

ISO13-07-10-015 DAL-GW-WW9R-FMS-131118 93.8 107

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RSD 97.0% ± 2.8% 110% ± 2.3%

NA = Not Applicable

(1) Samples were analyzed by external standard calibration. The surrogate recovery standards 13C4-PFOA and 13C4-PFOS were 

added to the samples during sample preparation.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 18 OF 24

Table 15. DAL GW WW10R 131118 (1)

PFOA PFBS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-016 DAL-GW-WW10R-0-131118 2410 NA 301 NA

ISO13-07-10-017 DAL-GW-WW10R-DB-131118 2380 NA 304 NA

ISO13-07-10-018 DAL-GW-WW10R-FMS-131118 4530 85.9 2790 99.5

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 2400 ng/mL ± 1.3% 303 ng/mL ± 0.99%

PFHS PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-016 DAL-GW-WW10R-0-131118 1120 NA 3940 NA

ISO13-07-10-017 DAL-GW-WW10R-DB-131118 1120 NA 3840 NA

ISO13-07-10-018 DAL-GW-WW10R-FMS-131118 3690 102 6390 100

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 1120 ng/mL ± 0.0% 3890 ng/mL ± 2.6%

13C4-PFOA 13C4-PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description %Recovery %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-016 DAL-GW-WW10R-0-131118 100 111

ISO13-07-10-017 DAL-GW-WW10R-DB-131118 97.0 110

ISO13-07-10-018 DAL-GW-WW10R-FMS-131118 93.5 108

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RSD 96.8% ± 3.4% 110% ± 1.4%

NA = Not Applicable

(1) Samples were analyzed by external standard calibration. The surrogate recovery standards 13C4-PFOA and 13C4-PFOS were 

added to the samples during sample preparation.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 19 OF 24

Table 16. DAL GW WW11R 131118 (1)

PFOA PFBS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-019 DAL-GW-WW11R-0-131118 1300 NA 286 NA

ISO13-07-10-020 DAL-GW-WW11R-DB-131118 1330 NA 288 NA

ISO13-07-10-021 DAL-GW-WW11R-FMS-131118 3620 92.7 2810 101

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 1320 ng/mL ± 2.3% 287 ng/mL ± 0.70%

PFHS PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-019 DAL-GW-WW11R-0-131118 673 NA 1790 NA

ISO13-07-10-020 DAL-GW-WW11R-DB-131118 687 NA 1900 NA

ISO13-07-10-021 DAL-GW-WW11R-FMS-131118 3220 101 4480 105

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RPD 680 ng/mL ± 2.1% 1850 ng/mL ± 5.9%

13C4-PFOA 13C4-PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description %Recovery %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-019 DAL-GW-WW11R-0-131118 100 110

ISO13-07-10-020 DAL-GW-WW11R-DB-131118 101 113

ISO13-07-10-021 DAL-GW-WW11R-FMS-131118 98.1 109

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± %RSD 99.7% ± 1.5% 111% ± 1.9%

NA = Not Applicable

(1) Samples were analyzed by external standard calibration. The surrogate recovery standards 13C4-PFOA and 13C4-PFOS were 

added to the samples during sample preparation.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 20 OF 24

Table 17. Trip Blank Results

PFOA PFBS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-022 DAL-GW-TRIP-0-131118 <0.0240 (1) NA <0.0250 (1) NA

ISO13-07-10-023 DAL-GW-TRIP-LS-131118 5.17 (2) 104 5.13 (2) 103

ISO13-07-10-024 DAL-GW-TRIP-HS-131118 2710 (2) 109 2490 (2) 99.6

PFHS PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

Concentration 

(ng/mL) %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-022 DAL-GW-TRIP-0-131118 <0.0400 (1) NA <0.0232 (1) NA

ISO13-07-10-023 DAL-GW-TRIP-LS-131118 4.84 (2) 96.8 4.98 (2) 99.8

ISO13-07-10-024 DAL-GW-TRIP-HS-131118 2530 (2) 101 2650 (2) 106

13C4-PFOA 13C4-PFOS

3M LIMS ID Description %Recovery %Recovery

ISO13-07-10-022 DAL-GW-TRIP-0-131118 107 (1) 106 (1)

ISO13-07-10-023 DAL-GW-TRIP-LS-131118 116 (2) 115 (2)

ISO13-07-10-024 DAL-GW-TRIP-HS-131118 114 (2) 113 (2)

NA = Not Applicable

(1) Samples were analyzed by internal standard calibration.

(2) Samples were analyzed by external standard calibration. The surrogate recovery standards 13C4-PFOA and 13C4-PFOS were 

added to the samples during sample preparation.
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY 

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10 

5 Conclusion 

Laboratory control spikes were used to determine the analytical method accuracy and precision for all 

analytes. The accuracy and precision were then used to estimate the method uncertainty for the 

results. Field matrix spil<e recoveries demonstrated that the analytical method was appropriate for the 

given sample matrix. Analysis was completed using 3M Environmental Laboratory Method ETS-8-

044.1 "Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; 

Direct Injection Analysis". Analytical results are reported in Table 1 and 10-17 of this report. 

6 Data / Sample Retention 

All remaining sample and associated project data (hardcopy and electronic) will be archived according 

to 3M Environmental Laboratory standard operating procedures. 

7 Attachments 

Attachment A: Analyte Trend Data for select sampling points at the Decatur Ground Water Treatment 

Plant (GWTP) GAC System. 

8 Signatures 

Susan T. Wolf, SMgpincipal Analytical Investigator Date 

William K. Reagen, Ph.D., 3M Environmental Laboratory Technical Director Date 

The 3M Environmental Laboratory's Quality Assurance Unit has audited the data and report for this 

project. 

Quality AssLj/ance Representative Date 

rA7/s test report shall not be reproduced except In full, without written approval of the 3M 

Environmental Laboratory. 

PAGE 21 OF 24 
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 22 OF 24

Attachment A: Analyte Trend Data for select sampling points at the Decatur Ground Water Treatment 

Plant (GWTP) GAC System 

ACI (Activated Carbon Influent) - Sample Results in ng/mL

ACI 1/17/2013 2/13/2013 3/27/2013 4/29/2013 5/31/2013 6/27/2013 7/23/2013 9/30/2013 10/28/2013 11/18/2013

PFOA 1910 2300 2220 1480 1860 1480 1630 2320 1880 2190

PFBS 588 830 1060 1360 1040 708 1230 356 1590 1100

PFHS 895 1580 1090 777 940 942 749 1400 866 1330

PFOS 1810 2940 2490 1670 2150 1590 1680 3240 2100 2240

ACE (Activated Carbon Effluent) - Sample Results in ng/mL

ACE 1/17/2013 2/13/2013 3/27/2013 4/29/2013 5/31/2013 6/27/2013 7/23/2013 9/30/2013 10/28/2013 11/18/2013

PFOA <0.0240 0.124 0.0380 0.0422 0.0725 0.0717 0.0643 0.115 0.231 0.478

PFBS <0.0250 0.0360 <0.0250 0.392 24.8 111 1960 1950 0.379 0.592

PFHS <0.0250 0.178 0.0477 0.057 0.105 0.118 0.0778 0.156 0.180 0.366

PFOS <0.0232 0.0329 <0.0232 <0.0232 <0.0232 <0.0232 0.0277 0.0452 0.0785 0.0726
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 23 OF 24

Attachment A: Analyte Trend Data for select sampling points at the Decatur Ground Water Treatment 

Plant (GWTP) GAC System 

WW8R - Sample Results in ng/mL

WW8R 1/17/2013 2/13/2013 3/27/2013 4/29/2013 5/31/2013 6/27/2013 7/23/2013 9/30/2013 10/28/2013 110/18/2013

PFOA 4350 3250 3640 3190 2760 2760 2640 2890 2830 3040

PFBS 410 354 385 364 289 282 263 303 312 362

PFHS 1930 1900 1760 1610 1330 1340 1260 1370 1300 1440

PFOS 5710 4850 5120 4830 4180 4110 3910 4100 4410 4750

WW9R - Sample Results in ng/mL

WW9R 1/17/2013 2/13/2013 3/27/2013 4/29/2013 5/31/2013 6/27/2013 7/23/2013 9/30/2013 10/28/2013 11/18/2013

PFOA 2710 2850 3330 2650 2660 2630 2410 2730 2820 2950

PFBS 184 236 278 244 226 225 212 249 286 305

PFHS 954 1400 1440 1200 1120 1140 1030 1220 1280 1340

PFOS 3690 4100 4660 4340 4210 4150 3670 4200 4380 4540
3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

REPORT NO. ISO13-07-10

PAGE 24 OF 24

Attachment A: Analyte Trend Data for select sampling points at the Decatur Ground Water Treatment 

Plant (GWTP) GAC System 

WW10R - Sample Results in ng/mL

WW10R 9/30/2013 10/28/2013 11/18/2013

PFOA 2070 2150 2400

PFBS 247 264 303

PFHS 1030 1030 1120

PFOS 2770 3160 3890

WW11R - Sample Results in ng/mL

WW11R 9/30/2013 10/28/2013 11/18/2013

PFOA 1720 1100 1320

PFBS 299 240 287

PFHS 1000 511 680

PFOS 2200 1670 1850