alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.19 FIRST AMENDMENT TO INCENTIVE PLAN



 





EXHIBIT 10.19




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

FLOWERS FOODS, INC.

2001 EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN




(as Previously Amended and Restated Effective February 11, 2005)




     THIS AMENDMENT is made this 25th day of August, 2006, by FLOWERS FOODS, INC., a
Georgia corporation (the “Company”), to the FLOWERS FOODS, INC. 2001 EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE
INCENTIVE PLAN, which has been previously amended and restated (the “Plan”).



     WHEREAS, the Company has previously adopted and restated the Plan, and pursuant to Section 18
thereof, Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has the authority to amend the Plan, subject in
certain cases to the approval of the Company’s shareholders; and,



     WHEREAS, the Board deems it desirable to amend the Plan as reflected below;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of August 25, 2006:



1.




     Section 11 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting said section in its entirety and
replacing it with the following Section 11:




     11. Adjustments. The Board shall make or provide for such adjustments in the
numbers of shares of Common Stock covered by outstanding Option
Rights, Deferred Stock, and Performance Stock granted hereunder, in
the Option Price, and in the kind of shares covered thereby, as is
equitably required to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights
of Participants or Optionees that otherwise would result from (a)
combination of shares, recapitalization or other change in the
capital structure of the Company, or (b) any merger, consolidation,
spin-off, split-off, spin-out, split-up, reorganization, partial or
complete liquidation or other distribution of assets, issuance of
rights or warrants to purchase securities, or (c) any other
corporate transaction, equity restructuring, or other event
having an effect similar to any of the foregoing. Similar
adjustments shall be made automatically,



 








 






without Board action, on a
purely mathematical basis in the event of a stock dividend or stock
split. In the event of any such transaction or event, the Board, in
its discretion, may provide in substitution for any or all
outstanding awards under this Plan such alternative consideration as
it, in good faith, may determine to be equitable in the
circumstances and may require in connection therewith the surrender
of all awards so replaced. The Board shall also make or provide for
such adjustments in the numbers of shares specified in Section 3 of
this Plan as is appropriate to reflect any transaction or event
described in this Section 11.



2.




     Section 15 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence of said section.



3.




     The remaining provisions of the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Second Amendment as directed by the
Committee.




FLOWERS FOODS, INC.




By: /s/ Jimmy M. Woodward

Title: Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer




2
#### § 1.652(c)-3 Termination of existence of other beneficiaries.

If the existence of a beneficiary which is not an individual terminates, the amount to be included under section 652(a) in its gross income for its last taxable year is computed with reference to §§ 1.652(c)-1 and 1.652(c)-2 as if the beneficiary were a deceased individual, except that income required to be distributed prior to the termination but actually distributed to the beneficiary's successor in interest is included in the beneficiary's income for its last taxable year.
#### Robert Saunders *v.*Warden, State Prison

*Robert Saunders,*pro se, the petitioner.

Submitted December 12

decided December 17, 1963

The application by the petitioner for certification for appeal to the United States District Court is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1845-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Arkansas (FEMA-1845-DR), dated June 16, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         July 24, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Arkansas is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of June 16, 2009.

Pope County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to iNdividuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-18408 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 3515

_____________________________
N AKIA C AMPBELL ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 23, 2021

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits

.
R OWE , C.J., and L EWIS and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Nakia Campbell, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Welch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
|WELLS
    FARGO(logo) | Corporate
                                                       Trust Services
                                                       MAC R1204-010
                                                       9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                       Columbia, MD 21045
                                                       Tel: 410 884 2000
                                                       Fax: 410 715 2380
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Re:     	Annual Statement of Compliance for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage
Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C3



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the
“Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (“Wells
Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):



(a)A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and



(b)To the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells
Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



February 27, 2017



|/s/
    BRIAN SMITH | 
|------------------- | 
|BRIAN
    SMITH     | 
|Vice
    President  | 



|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together
    we’ll go far
|-------------------------- | -------------------------
No. 76-1120.

#### California Department of Benefit Payments et al. *v.*England, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.
§ 1.513-6 Certain hospital services not unrelated trade or business. ( a ) *In general.* Under section 513(e), the furnishing of a service listed in section 501(e)(1)(A) by a hospital to one or more other hospitals will not constitute unrelated trade or business if— ( 1 ) The service is provided solely to hospitals that have facilities to serve not more than 100 inpatients,
( 2 ) The service would, if performed by the recipient hospital, constitute an activity consistent with that hospital's exempt purposes, and
( 3 ) The service is provided at a fee not in excess of actual cost, including straight line depreciation and a reasonable rate of return on the capital goods used to provide the service. For purposes of this section, a rate of return on capital goods will be considered *reasonable* provided that it does not exceed, on an annual basis, the percentage described below which is based on the average of the rates of interest on special issues of public debt obligations issued to the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund for each of the months included in the taxable year of the hospital duringwhich the captial goods are used in providing the service. Determinations as to the cost of services and the applicable rate of return should be made as prescribed by 42 U.S.C. 1395x(v)(1) (A) and (B) and the regulations thereunder (permitting a health care facility to be reimbursed under the Medicare program for the *reasonable cost of (its) services,* including, in the case of certain proprietary facilities, a *reasonable return on equity capital*). For taxable years beginning on or before May 14, 1986, the rate of return shall be one and one-half times the average of the rates of interest on public debt obligations described above which were in effect on or before April 20, 1983.
( b ) *Hospital defined.* As used in this section the word *hospital* means a hospital described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(iii).
( c ) *Example.* The provisions of this section are illustrated by the following example: Example. A large metropolitan hospital provides various services to other hospitals. The hospital furnishes a purchasing service to hosptials N and O, a data processing service to hospitals R and S, and a food service to hospitals X and Y. All the hospitals are described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(iii). All the hospitals have facilities to serve not more than 100 inpatients except hospital N. The services are furnished at cost to all hospitals except that hospital R is charged a fee in excess of cost for its use of the data processing service. The purchasing service constitutes unrelated trade or business because it is not provided solely to hospitals having facilities to serve not more than 100 inpatients. The data processing service constitutes unrelated trade or business because it is provided at a fee in excess of cost. The food service satisfies all three requirements of paragraph (a) of this section and does not constitute unrelated trade or business.
( d ) *Effective date.* Section 513(e) and this section apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953.
[T.D. 8075, 51 FR 5322, Feb. 13, 1986; 51 FR 8490, Mar. 12, 1986]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          51,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  448,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,988
<INVENTORY>                                    876,111
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,447,148
<PP&E>                                         120,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,575,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          954,690
<BONDS>                                        541,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           273
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,575,976
<SALES>                                      6,541,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,541,355
<CGS>                                        6,223,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,223,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               206,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,505
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,329
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,165
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,165
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.95
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.13.1

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                      SYSTEM EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                                    BETWEEN
                          CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                      AND
                              NORTEL NETWORKS INC.


This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") is made effective as of the February 7,
2003, by and between Cricket Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Owner"), and Nortel Networks Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Vendor").

WHEREAS, Owner and Vendor entered into an Amended and Restated System Equipment
Purchase Agreement effective December 23, 2002, for the sale, licensing, and
purchase of Vendor's Equipment and Services ("Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, Owner and Vendor now wish to clarify the definition of the Contract
Term.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and
other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, Owner and Vendor hereby agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:

1. Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms herein shall have the same
   meaning as in the Agreement.

2. Add the words "Amended and Restated" prior to the words "Effective Date" in
   the definition of "Contract Term" in Section 1 (Definitions) of the
   Agreement.

3. Except as specifically modified by Amendment No. 1, the Agreement in all
   other respects shall continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be signed by
their duly authorized representatives effective as of the date first set forth
above.

CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.                 NORTEL NETWORKS INC.

By:    /s/ Steven M. Pierson                 By:    /s/ Lance Levin
       -----------------------------                ----------------------------
Name:  Steven M. Pierson                     Name:  Lance Levin
       -----------------------------                ----------------------------
Title: V.P. Engineering & Operations         Title: Sr. Mgr., Contracts
       -----------------------------                ----------------------------
Date:  3/25/03                               Date:  3/18/03
       -----------------------------                ----------------------------


            Nortel Networks Confidential and Proprietary Information
                                   OCD #21962
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 03, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 03, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0241. MARION HUTCHESON v. JOHNNY MCLENDON et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 17CV086
Exhibit
10.27


 


November 14, 2002


 


 


Mr. John W. Bachmann


Managing Director


Edward Jones


12555 Manchester Road


St. Louis, MO 63131-3279


 


Dear Mr. Bachmann:


 


This will confirm the following agreement relating to
the deferral of your director’s fees in 2003.


 


1.                                       All
director’s fees and retainers (“Fees”) 
payable to you in connection with your service on the boards of
directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, will
be deferred and paid to you in accordance with this letter agreement.


 


2.                                       Fees
will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Directors’
Stock Equivalent Purchase Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A
(the “Plan”).


 


3.                                       Within
30 days of the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR Corporation, the
Stock Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to the Plan will be converted to cash
and paid to you by multiplying the number of such Stock Equivalent Units by the
arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market value”)
during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation.


 


4.                                       AMR’s
obligation to make the payment pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof will not be
released or modified by reason of your death. 
In such event, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of
death will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the
calendar month immediately preceding your death, and the amount paid to
Katharine Bachmann.


 

















 


If the foregoing is satisfactory to you, please
indicate by signing one of the originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to
me.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Charles D. MarLett

  
	
   

  	
  Corporate Secretary

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted and agreed:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ John W. Bachmann

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  John W. Bachmann

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  11/16/02

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
				



 


2
Exhibit 35.19



|(well fargo logo) | Corporate
                                         Trust Services



MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis
Road

Columbia, MD 21045



Tel: 410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C32 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015- C32
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), the
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (“Wells Fargo”), hereby
certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”):



(a) A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and



(b) To the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



March 1, 2016



|/s/ Brian Smith | 
|--------------- | 
|BRIAN SMITH     | 
|Vice President  | 



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (GRAPHIC)
|---------------------- | ---------
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 24

- 00215

- CV
De Leon Aircraft Maintenance Professional and Christopher De Leon, individually v. Luis Gutierrez and Sergio Gutierrez
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 9 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 19

- 5452

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 31, 2024
SCAD-16-0000523

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner,

vs.

WILLIAM T. MARTINEZ,

Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC Case No. 15-034-9253)

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the December 20, 2016 affidavit

submitted by Respondent William T. Martinez and the record, it

appears Respondent Martinez has complied with the terms of his

suspension. We further note Respondent Martinez has averred he

intends to comply in a timely manner with the requirement he pay

$2,417.00 in restitution to his former client. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule

2.17(b), Respondent Martinez is reinstated to the practice of law

in the jurisdiction of the State of Hawai#i, effective upon entry

of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 5, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCAD-16-0000523

05-JAN-2017

01:17 PM