alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

1001 ISTREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 • P.O. Box 2815, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-2815 LINDA S.ADAMS (916) 323-2514' (916) 324-0908 FAX • WWW.CALEPA.CA.GOY

SECRETARY FOR ENVIRONMENfAL PROTECTION ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER GOVERNOR

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105-3901

Thank you for your letter of October 19, 2010 to Governor Schwarzenegger seeking the position of the State of California (State) on the proposed listing of the Blue Ledge Mine on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). The State agrees that the environmental threats identified in your letter must be addressed; however we are concerned with the long-term funding obligations that typically fall to the State at sites like the Blue Ledge Mine. Accordingly, concurrence with this listing or with any future Record of Decision and subsequent agreement to State Superfund ContraCts must be based in part on selection of optimal remedial actions that limit or eliminate long-term operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. Where appropriate, the State will be looking to the United States EPA for substantial application of removal action funding and support for identification and selection of protective remedies which will reduce State cost share requirements. The State will also be seeking a cooperative partnership with U.S. EPA to aggressively pursue cost recovery against viable responsible parties and to creatively identify alternative funding sources. Finally, the State will be looking to the U.S. EPA to help develop long-term sustainability and optimization of funding sources for cleanup of both NPL fund lead and State Orphan sites. Meeting this objective will require clo~e coordination with U.S. EPA in developingfunding strategies for existing fund lead sites, as well as consideration of potential longterm burden on the State in selection of future NPL sites. Long-term O&M at fund lead sites may require management in a fashion that optimizes utilization of available funding which could include reduction or elimination of certain O&M activities based on established budget priorities.

AIR RESOURCES BOARD' DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION' DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD AsSESSMENT STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD • REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS, Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Page 2 To the extent that the above conditions are acceptable to U.S. EPA, the State supports listing of Blue Ledge Mine on the NPL. '



# -if._ 

# :J tUr0, 

# /Id(U7l4.

~~tams ' Secretary for Environmental Protection
cc: Mr. Thomas Howard Executive Director State Water Resources Control Board Post Office Box 100 Sacramento, California 95812-0100
Ms. Pamela Creedon Executive Officer Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region 11020 Sun Center Drive, Suite 200 Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Mr. Maziar Movassaghi Acting Director Department of Toxic Substances Control Post Office Box 806 Sacramento, California 95812-0806
§ 1.163-11 Allocation of certain prepaid qualified mortgage insurance premiums. ( a ) *Allocation* — ( 1 ) *In general.* As provided in section 163(h)(3)(E), premiums paid or accrued for qualified mortgage insurance during the taxable year in connection with acquisition indebtedness with respect to a qualified residence (as defined in section 163(h)(4)(A)) of the taxpayer shall be treated as qualified residence interest (as defined in section 163(h)(3)(A)). If an individual taxpayer pays such a premium that is properly allocable to a mortgage the payment of which extends to periods beyond the close of the taxable year in which the premium is paid, the taxpayer must allocate the premium to determine the amount treated as qualified residence interest for each taxable year. The premium must be allocated ratably over the shorter of— ( i ) The stated term of the mortgage; or
( ii ) A period of 84 months, beginning with the month in which the insurance was obtained.
( 2 ) *Limitation.* If a mortgage is satisfied before the end of its stated term, no deduction as qualified residence interest shall be allowed for any amount of the premium that is allocable to periods after the mortgage is satisfied.
( b ) *Scope.* The allocation requirement in paragraph (a) of this section applies only to mortgage insurance provided by the Federal Housing Administration or private mortgage insurance (as defined by section 2 of the Homeowners Protection Act of 1998 (12 U.S.C. 4901) as in effect on December 20, 2006). It does not apply to mortgage insurance provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Rural Housing Service. Paragraph (a) of this section applies whether the qualified mortgage insurance premiums are paid in cash or are financed, without regard to source.
( c ) *Limitation on the treatment of mortgage insurance premiums as interest.* This section applies to prepaid qualified mortgage insurance premiums described in paragraph (a) of this section that are paid or accrued on or after January 1, 2011, and during periods to which section 163(h)(3)(E) is applicable. This section does not apply to any amount of prepaid qualified mortgage insurance premiums that are allocable to any periods to which section 163(h)(3)(E) is not applicable.
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section is applicable on and after January 1, 2011. For regulations applicable before January 1, 2011, see § 1.163-11T in effect prior to January 1, 2011 (§ 1.163-11T as contained in 26 CFR part 1 edition revised as of April 1, 2011).
[T.D. 9588, 77 FR 26699, May 7, 2012]
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Principal Plus Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee
Horwitz, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Lee Horwitz

Name:	   Lee Horwitz
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   November 14, 2007
ORNETC GENERAL

HonorableWm. J.~Uve~On SecPetsv,,ofstate Austlnj Texas

Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-3330 Re: Constructionof Article 7084,V.A.C.S. as amended by the 47th Leg., Regular Session.
We acknowledgereceipt of our’ request for an opinion on whether or not under Artlele 708 1 Vernon'sAnnotatedCivil Statutes,as amended by the 47th Legislature, Regular Session, you may assess the franchisetax on notes, bonds and debentures that mature in less than a year but are outstanding more than a year from date of inceptionand have not been renewed or extended.

The above article reads in part as follows: *

. . . All such Instruments vhich bear a maturity date of less than one year from date of iaaue but which represent Indebtedness which has remained outstanding for a period of one year or more from date of inception,but which have been renewed or extended, or refinancedbgthe ifsuanceof other evidencesof. the indebtedness.

. . (Italicsours)
A court will not assume to construe or interpreta statute if there is no necessity for it to do SO. Larkln v. Pruett Lumber Company, 209 S.W. 443. Ror is a court privileged to interpolate

vords, to add or eliminateprovisions,or to enlarge, extend or restrict the scope of a law, except as this may be necessary to effectuatethe legislativeintent. 39 Tex. Jur. 89. "The word 'but' (as used in the amendment)is an appropriate term to indicate the intention of those who use it to limit or restrain the sense or effect of something that has been said, or to Indicatea proviso, condition,qualiflcatlonor exbeptlon." i;ion Bargain Trust Co. vs. Bulldin SecuritiesCorp., 273 H. W.

. (Parenthetical

InsCrtionoursHon. Wm. J. Lawson, page 2 (o-3330)

Prior to the am&&meat here under Consideration, the tax was calculatedupon bonds, notes and debentureeother than thosematuring less than a year from the date of Isaac. It is apparent from a reading of ~the amendment that the leglslatlveintent was to include, other bonds, notes and debentures. The amendment says in plain anQ unmistakable vords that there shall be included those bonds, notes and debeatnrer maturing In less than a year provided they have remainedoutstanding a year or more from the date of inceptionand further provided that they have been reneved,extended or re-financed by the issuanceof other evidencesof indebtedness.

Yen are, therefore,advised that you may not include in the supplementalreport those **notes,** bonds and debentureswhich are’issuedfor a period of less than one year from the date of Issue, and which represent indebtedness which has been in existencefor a period of one year or more from the date of inception of the indebtedness, but which have not been renewed or extended,or re-fbanced by the Issuance of ser evidences of the indebtedness.

Tpgsting that the foregoingfully ansvers your inquiry, we are Very truly yours ATTORltEY

GEIIWAL OF TEXAS

APPROVED JUL 18, 1941
/s/ Grover Seller6 First Asslstaat AttorneyBeneral RHC:X?:B By Richard H. Cooke /a/ Richard H. Cocke Assietant

APPROVED Opinion Committee BY BWB Chairman
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 164

Expressing the sense of the Senate commemorating the bombing

of Pan Am Flight 103.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. HATCH, and Mr. GRASSLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate commemorating the

bombing of Pan Am Flight 103.

Whereas two hundred and fifty-nine passengers and crew

members of Pan American Airways Flight 103 and eleven persons on the ground in Lockerbie, Scotland, were

killed by a terrorist bomb on December 21, 1988;

Whereas one hundred and eighty-nine Americans were victims of this heinous attack along with citizens from

twenty other nations;

Whereas this was effectively an attack on the United States

and on all nations which support the rule of law;

Whereas the families and friends of the victims of this outrageous and criminal act have suffered an incalculable
2

SRES 164 IS

loss and have worked actively to diminish the possibility

of future attacks;

Whereas, on December 21, 1993, five years will have passed

without the terrorists who murdered the passengers and

crew of Pan Am Flight 103 being brought to justice;

Whereas the United States must never forget the victims of

this crime nor weaken in its resolve to bring their murderers to justice; and

Whereas it is appropriate and fitting that the United States

set aside a day to commemorate the bombing of Pan Am

Flight 103 as an act of remembrance for the victims, an

expression of solidarity with their loved ones and a token

of the abiding United States commitment to obtain justice for their murderers: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That December 21, 1993, is designated a

2 ‘‘Fifth Anniversary Day of Remembrance for the Victims

3 of the Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103’’, and the President

4 is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling

5 upon the people of the United States to observe this day

6 with appropriate ceremonies.

Æ
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8094 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to modify certain asset 

recovery rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2024 

Mr. KEAN of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to modify 

certain asset recovery rules. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN ASSET RECOVERY 

4 RULES. 

5 Section 1917(b)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1396p(b)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘unless, 

7 at the option of the State, after the death of the individual 

8 the home of such individual is transferred to another indi9 vidual who is eligible for medical assistance under this title 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8094 IH

1 or has an income below 138 percent of the Federal poverty 

2 level’’ after ‘‘paid on behalf of the individual’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
§ 1.168(i)-3 Treatment of excess deferred income tax reserve upon disposition of deregulated public utility property. ( a ) *Scope* — ( 1 ) *In general.* This section provides rules for the application of section 203(e) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Public Law 99-514 (100 Stat. 2146) to a taxpayer with respect to public utility property (within the meaning of section 168(i)(10)) that ceases, whether by disposition, deregulation, or otherwise, to be public utility property with respect to the taxpayer and that is not described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section (deregulated public utility property).
( 2 ) *Exceptions.* This section does not apply to the following property: ( i ) Property that ceases to be public utility property with respect to the taxpayer on account of an ordinary retirement within the meaning of § 1.167(a)-11(d)(3)(ii).
( ii ) Property transferred by the taxpayer if after the transfer the property is public utility property of the transferee and the taxpayer's excess tax reserve with respect to the property (within the meaning of section 203(e) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986) is treated as an excess tax reserve of the transferee with respect to the property.
( b ) *Amount of reduction.* If public utility property of a taxpayer becomes deregulated public utility property to which this section applies, the reduction in the taxpayer's excess tax reserve permitted under section 203(e) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 is equal to the amount by which the reserve could be reduced under that provision if all such property had remained public utility property of the taxpayer and the taxpayer had continued use of its normalization method of accounting with respect to such property.
( c ) *Cross reference.* See § 1.46-6(k) for rules relating to the treatment of accumulated deferred investment tax credits when utilities dispose of regulated public utility property.
( d ) *Effective/applicability dates* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, this section applies to public utility property that becomes deregulated public utility property after December 21, 2005.
( 2 ) *Property that becomes public utility property of the transferee.* This section does not apply to property that becomes deregulated public utility property with respect to a taxpayer on account of a transfer on or before March 20, 2008 if after the transfer the property is public utility property of the transferee.
( 3 ) *Application of regulation project (REG-104385-01).* A reduction in the taxpayer's excess deferred income tax reserve will be treated as ratable if it is consistent with the proposed rules in regulation project (REG-104385-01) (68 FR 10190) March 4, 2003, and occurs during the period beginning on March 5, 2003, and ending on the earlier of— ( i ) The last date on which the utility's rates are determined under the rate order in effect on December 21, 2005; or
( ii ) December 21, 2007.
[T.D. 9387, 73 FR 14937, Mar. 20, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         933,555
<SECURITIES>                                   207,007
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,637,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,845,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         386,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 274,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,994,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                         6,475
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,295,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,994,176
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,207,846
<CGS>                                        4,513,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            131,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   131,993
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1.267(d)-2 Effective/applicability dates.

Pursuant to section 7851(a)(1)(C), the regulations prescribed in § 1.267(d)-1, to the extent that they relate to determination of gain resulting from the sale or other disposition of property after December 31, 1953, with respect to which property a loss was not allowable to the transferor by reason of section 267(a)(1) (or by reason of section 24(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939), shall also apply to taxable years beginning before January 1, 1954, and ending after December 31, 1953, and taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending before August 17, 1954, which years are subject to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. The provisions of § 1.267(d)-1(a)(3) relating to section 1022 are effective on and after January 19, 2017.

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11402, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 9811, 82 FR 6237, Jan. 19, 2017]
§ 1.584-3 Computation of common trust fund income. The taxable income of the common trust fund shall be computed in the same manner and on the same basis as in the case of an individual, except that: ( a ) No deduction shall be allowed under section 170 (relating to charitable, etc., contributions and gifts);
( b ) The gains and losses from sales or exchanges of capital assets of the common trust fund are required to be segregated. A common trust fund is not allowed the benefit of the capital loss carryover provided by section 1212; and
( c ) The ordinary taxable income (the excess of the gross income over deductions) or the ordinary net loss (the excess of the deductions over the gross income) shall be computed after excluding all items of gain and loss from sales or exchanges of capital assets.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11737, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7935, 49 FR 1694, Jan. 13, 1984]
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 9

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating

to voluntary school prayer.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. THURMOND (for himself and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relating to voluntary school prayer.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is hereby proposed as an amendment to the

5 Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to

6 all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if rati7 fied by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years from the date of its submission

9 to the States by the Congress:
2

SJ 9 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to

3 prohibit individual or group prayer in public schools or

4 other public institutions. No person shall be required by

5 the United States or by any State to participate in prayer.

6 Neither the United States nor any State shall compose

7 the words of any prayer to be said in public schools.’’.

Æ
§ 1.45-6 Increased credit amount. ( a ) *In general.* If a qualified facility (as defined in section 45) satisfies the requirements in paragraph (b) of this section, the amount of the renewable electricity production credit determined under section 45(a) (after the application of section 45(b)(1) through (5)) is equal to the credit determined under section 45(a) multiplied by five.
( b ) *Qualified facility requirements.* A qualified facility satisfies the requirements of this paragraph (b) if it is one of the following— ( 1 ) A facility with a maximum net output (as determined under paragraph (c) of this section) of less than one megawatt (as measured in alternating current);
( 2 ) A facility the construction of which began prior to January 29, 2023; or
( 3 ) A facility that meets the prevailing wage requirements of section 45(b)(7) and § 1.45-7, the apprenticeship requirements of section 45(b)(8) and § 1.45-8, and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements of § 1.45-12.
( c ) *Definition of nameplate capacity for purposes of determining maximum net output under section 45(b)(6)(B)(i).* For purposes of determining whether a facility has a maximum net output of less than one megawatt (as measured in alternating current) for purposes of section 45(b)(6)(B)(i), nameplate capacity is determinative. *Nameplate capacity* for an electrical generating unit means the maximum electrical generating output in megawatts that the unit is capable of producing on a steady state basis and during continuous operation under standard conditions, as measured by the manufacturer and consistent with the definition provided in 40 CFR 96.202. If applicable, the International Standard Organization (ISO) conditions are used to measure the maximum electrical generating output or usable energy capacity.
( d ) *Applicability date.* This section applies to qualified facilities placed in service in taxable years ending after June 25, 2024, and the construction of which begins after June 25, 2024. Taxpayers may apply this section to qualified facilities placed in service in taxable years ending on or before June 25, 2024, and qualified facilities placed in service in taxable years ending after June 25, 2024, the construction of which begins before June 25, 2024, provided that taxpayers follow this section in its entirety and in a consistent manner.