alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                 474,816
<SECURITIES>                           151,040
<RECEIVABLES>                          154,548
<ALLOWANCES>                            42,902
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       938,516
<PP&E>                                 218,032
<DEPRECIATION>                          97,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,652,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  260,187
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                             30,000
<COMMON>                                10,421
<OTHER-SE>                           1,352,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         1,652,658
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       679,867
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        106,816
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    106,816
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           106,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

KAISER GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.9302 Lee Highway, Fairfax, Virginia 22031  (703) 934-3300

Kaiser
Group Holdings, Inc.'s consolidated subsidiaries are listed below. Consolidated subsidiaries which are less than wholly owned are indicated by the ownership percentage
figure in parentheses following the name of the consolidated subsidiary.

|Consolidated Subsidiary |  | Jurisdiction
of Formation       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|I.                      |  | Kaiser Group International, Inc.
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  |                                 
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  | II.                             
|                        |  | II.                             

---

QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund VII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: November 10, 2004                /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                       Name:   James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                       Title:  Chief Executive Officer

                                      A   signed   original   of  this   written
                                      statement required by Section 906 has been
                                      provided to CNL Income Fund VII,  Ltd. and
                                      will be  retained  by CNL Income Fund VII,
                                      Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
                                      Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon
                                      request.
p070599.en1.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 07-0599

Post-Focus Draft Revision 1 10/16/2007

ENGINEER: Hall \ DTN

PV (kg/yr): 

Revision Notes / Assessment Overview: 

SUBMITTER: 3M

USE: 

 

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt:

Respirator: . Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL: 

CRSS (08/13/2007):

Chemical Name:

S-H20: g/L @

VP: torr @

MW: %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Neat: d Mfg: Proc/Form: 

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9
p070599.en1.txt

 End Use: Submitted Data: 

 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (08/14/2007):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B2T2 .

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, Fish

Ingestion

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb)



OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9
p070599.en1.txt

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claim: 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 



INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 07-0599

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Page 3

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9
p070599.en1.txt

 Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: 

High End: 

 

to: 

from:

basis:

Output 2: 

 

to: 

from:

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:



Exposure to at concentration

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) 

Basis: 

 

 

Page 4

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9
p070599.en1.txt

Exposure to at concentration

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) 

Basis:



INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 07-0599

Number of Sites/ Location: 

 Days/yr: 

Basis: 

Page 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 9
p070599.en1.txt

Process Description: 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: 

High End: 

 

to: 

from:

basis: 

Output 2: 

to: 

from: 

basis: 

 

Conservative: 

 to:

basis: 

Output 2: 

 

to: 

from: 

basis: 

 

RELEASE TOTAL

Page 6

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9
p070599.en1.txt

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Exposure to 

Low End of Range: High End of Range: Number of workers (all sites) 

Basis: 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Exposure to at concentration

High End: Number of workers (all sites) 

Basis:

Exposure to at concentration

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) : 

Basis:

Page 7

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
p070599.en1.txt

Exposure to at concentration

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) 

Basis:



CALL BY:

Organization:

CALL TO:

Organization:

Date:

Time:

Phone:

Page 8

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9
p070599.en1.txt

-

Page 9

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9
#### § 1.48D-1--1.48D-5 [Reserved]
Exhibit 4.2



Irrevocable Limited Proxy to Vote Corporate Shares



THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER, being the owner of ________________ shares of common stock (the Stock) of Itec Environmental Group, Inc. (Itec), pursuant to that certain Settlement and Release Agreement between _____________________ and Itec, of even date herewith, does hereby grant to Itec an irrevocable limited proxy (the Proxy) and hereby appoint it my attorney-in-fact to vote the Stock in connection therewith.  Itec, through its representatives, is entitled to attend said meetings (or execute a consent in lieu of a meeting) and act on my behalf and vote said Stock personally or through mail proxy, all to the same extent as if I voted said Shares personally.



For one hundred eighty (180) days from the date hereof (the Expiration Date), all rights to vote the Stock shall be held by Itec with full power of substitution or revocation.



This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors, assigns, and personal representatives.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this proxy this ________ day of ________________, 2004.



PROXY HOLDER:

STOCKHOLDER:





ITEC ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.







________________________

________________________

Name: Gary De Laurentiis

Name:

Its: CEO
#### § 1.668(a)-2A Allocation among beneficiaries; in general.

The portion of the total amount includible in income under § 1.668(a)-1A which is includible in the income of a particular beneficiary is based upon the ratio determined under the second sentence of section 662(a)(2) for the taxable year (and not for the preceding taxable year). This section may be illustrated by the following example:

# Example.

(a) Under the terms of a trust instrument, the trustee may accumulate the income or make distributions to A and B. The trustee may also invade corpus for the benefit of A and B. The distributable net income of the trust for taxable year 1975 is $10,000. The trust had undistributed net income for taxable year 1973, the first year of the trust, of $5,000, to which a tax of $1,100 was allocable. On May 1, 1975, the trustee distributes $10,000 to A, and on November 29, 1975, he distributes $5,000 to B. Thus, of the total distribution of $15,000, A received two-thirds and B receives one-third.

(b) For the purposes of determining the amounts includible in the beneficiaries' gross income for 1975, the trust is deemed to have made the following distributions:

| Amount distributed out of 1975 income (distributable net income) | $10,000 |
| --- | --- |
| Accumulation distribution deemed distributed by the trust on the last day of 1973 under section 666(a) | 5,000 |
| Taxes imposed on the trust attributable to the undistributed net income deemed distributed under section 666(b) | 1,100 |

(c) A will include in his income for 1975 two-thirds of each item shown in paragraph (b) of this example. Thus, he will include in gross income $6,666.67 (10,000/15,000 × $10,000) of the 1975 distributable net income of the trust as provided in section 662(a)(2) (which is not an amount includable in his income under § 1.668(a)-1A(a)). He will include in his income $3,333.33 (10,000/15,000 × $5,000) of the accumulation distribution and $733.33 (10,000/15,000 × $1,100) of the taxes imposed on the trust, as provided in section 668(a).

(d) B will include in his income for 1975 one-third of each item shown in paragraph (b) of this example, computed in the manner shown in paragraph (c) of this example.

(e) To the extent the total accumulation distribution consists of undistributed net income and undistributed capital gain, A and B shall be treated as receiving a pro rata share of each for the preceding taxable year 1973.

[T.D. 7204, 37 FR 17148, Aug. 25, 1972]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by andamong CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, CITIBANK,N.A., as Certificate Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, asTrustee , and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Custodian with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.08 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Stratigraphy and structure, Death Valley, California

#### Professional Paper 494-A

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (40471 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                 
    (12072 pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                 
    (1730 pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                 
    (10234 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp494A 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:19
IV

House Calendar No. 229

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 153

[Report No. 104–589]

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater Washington

Soap Box Derby.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 1996

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. WYNN, Ms. NORTON, Mr.

WOLF, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. DAVIS) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure

MAY 21, 1996

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the Greater

Washington Soap Box Derby.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 153 RH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

2 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

3 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa4 tion (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘As5 sociation’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public event,

6 soap box derby races, on the Capitol grounds on July 13,

7 1996, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House

8 of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the

9 Senate may jointly designate.

10 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

11 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

12 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

13 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi14 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

15 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

17 incident to all activities associated with the event.

18 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

19 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

20 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol grounds, subject

21 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

22 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

23 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car24 ried out under this resolution.
3

•HCON 153 RH

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

3 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar4 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

5 under this resolution.
House Calendar No. 229

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 153

[Report No. 104–589]

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol grounds for the

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.

MAY 21, 1996

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
H. Con. Res. 132 Agreed to September 25, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Relating to the trial of Martin Pang for arson and felony murder.

Whereas it is alleged that Martin Pang intentionally started a

warehouse fire in Seattle, Washington on January 5, 1995, that

killed four firefighters;

Whereas shortly thereafter Martin Pang fled to Brazil from where

he was extradited to the United States on March 1, 1996;

Whereas the extradition decision of the Supreme Court of Brazil

states that Martin Pang should stand trial in the United States

only for arson and not for felony murder; and

Whereas it is accepted international practice in extradition cases

for the executive authorities of the requested state to grant consent for prosecution of offenses other than those for which the

fugitive was extradited: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that in the interests

of justice and furthering good relations between the United States

and Brazil, the Government of Brazil should grant its consent

to prosecution of Martin Pang for both arson and felony murder.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION





I, Cindy Wang, certify that:





(a) A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities
      and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 26, 2015 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the
      “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-C Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.





March 21, 2019





By:  /s/ Cindy Wang


Cindy Wang


Group Vice President - Treasury


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-C Owner Trust
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-61034

Summary Calendar

JAMES ALTON GIPSON

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROCKY WILLIAMSON, Officer; DERRICK MINGO; ALANDO SELLERS,

Officer

Defendants-Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:04-CV-00213

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Alton Gipson, Mississippi prisoner # 21821, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint in which he asserted, inter alia, an excessive force claim against

Rocky Williamson, Derrick Mingo, and Alando Sellers, correctional officers at the

Marion/Walthall Correctional Facility (MWCF). Williamson, Mingo, and Sellers

now appeal the district court’s rejection of the qualified immunity defense

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-61034

2

asserted in their motion for summary judgment. See Hampton v. Oktibbeha

County Sheriff Dep’t, 480 F.3d 358, 363 (5th Cir. 2007). 

The district court’s finding that there was insufficient evidence in the

record to analyze the issue of the reasonableness of the appellants’ conduct

determined only a question of “evidence sufficiency.” See Johnson v. Jones, 515

U.S. 304, 313 (1995). As such, it is not a final, appealable order. See id. “Unlike

denials of qualified immunity which are immediately appealable because they

turn on an issue of law,” Boulos v. Wilson, 834 F.2d 504, 509 (5th Cir. 1987)

(citing Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511 (1985)), the appellants’ immunity

defense turns on the factual issue “whether force was applied in a good faith

effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously and sadistically for the

very purpose of causing harm.” Valencia v. Wiggins, 981 F.2d 1440, 1446 (5th

Cir. 1993) (internal quotation marks and footnote citations omitted). As the

presence of a genuine issue of material fact regarding qualified immunity

precludes this court from exercising jurisdiction, this appeal must be dismissed.

Johnson, 515 U.S. at 313-20. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.