alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 145 (Thursday, July 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38049-38050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-62,613]


Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc., Longview Mill, Formerly 
Longview Fibre Company, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Oregon 
Electric and J.H. Kelly, Longview, WA; Amended Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration on April 16, 2008. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on April 23, 2008 (73 FR 21992-
21993).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration for workers of the 
subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of kraft paper.
    New information shows that workers leased workers from Oregon 
Electric and J.H. Kelly were employed on-site at the Longview, 
Washington location of Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc., 
Longview Mill, Formerly Longview Fibre Company. The Department has 
determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of 
Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc., Longview Mill, Formerly 
Longview Fibre Company to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this revised 
determination to include workers leased from Oregon Electric and J.H. 
Kelly working on-site at the Longview, Washington location of the 
subject firm.

[[Page 38050]]

    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers adversely affected by increased imports of kraft paper who were 
employed at Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc., Longview Mill, 
formerly Longview Fibre Company, Longview, Washington.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-62,613 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc., 
Longview Mill, formerly Longview Fibre Company, including on-site 
leased workers from Oregon Electric and J.H. Kelly, Longview, 
Washington, engaged in the production of kraft paper, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 
27, 2006, through April 16, 2010, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of July 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18181 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 69

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require that a financial

impact statement be included in the report accompanying each bill or

joint resolution reported by any committee (except those by the Committee on Appropriations), showing the financial impact that any Federal

mandates in the bill or joint resolution would have on States and local

governments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 16 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. HEFLIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require that

a financial impact statement be included in the report

accompanying each bill or joint resolution reported by

any committee (except those by the Committee on Appropriations), showing the financial impact that any Federal

mandates in the bill or joint resolution would have on

States and local governments.

1 Resolved, That paragraph 11 of rule XXVI of the

2 Standing Rules of the Senate is amended—

3 (1) in subparagraph (c) by striking ‘‘(a) and

4 (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a), (b), and (c)’’;
2

•SRES 69 IS

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (c) as sub2 paragraph (d); and

3 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (b) the fol4 lowing:

5 ‘‘(c) Each such report (except those by the Commit6 tee on Appropriations) shall also contain—

7 ‘‘(1) an evaluation, made by such committee, of

8 the financial impact that any Federal mandates in

9 the bill or joint resolution would have on State and

10 local governments; or

11 ‘‘(2) in lieu of such evaluation, a statement of

12 the reasons why compliance by the committee with

13 the requirements of clause (1) is impracticable.’’.

Æ
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### A compositionally zoned ash-flow sheet in southern 
Nevada

#### Professional Paper 524-F

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp524F 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:16
#### James Triano *v.*Susan Brodowy

King, C. J., Mubphy, Shea, Alcobn and Comley, Js.

Argued December 5, 1963

decided March 3, 1964

*446
      *Frederic E. Mascolo,*with whom, on the brief, were *Robert L. Broohs*and *Stephen K. Elliott,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Joseph H. Thalberg,*with whom, on the brief, was *Thomas J. Galich,*for the appellee (defendant).

Comley, J.

The plaintiff seeks an injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with his use, as a part of his driveway, of a small, triangular strip of land located between their adjoining lots on South Main Street in Southington. The plaintiff claims more than an easement by prescription; he asserts full title by adverse possession.

The court found that the plaintiff’s user of the strip as part of his driveway did not commence until 1947 and that the user terminated in 1958, when the defendant erected a fence across the strip. The court therefore concluded that the plaintiff had not established adverse possession for the requisite period of fifteen years. The plaintiff attacks this finding and calls attention to evidence offered by him that his user has been continuous since 1929. This evidence was in direct conflict with the evidence offered by the defendant which fully supports the court’s finding. We cannot retry the facts or pass upon the credibility of witnesses. *Zeller*v. *Kugell,*145 Conn. 729, 730, 141 A.2d 240; *Bridgeport-City Trust Co.*v. *Buchtenkirk,*143 Conn. 531, *447537, 124 A.2d 231. Since no correction of the finding can be made, the plaintiff’s appeal must fail. There is no error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 2 8 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk August 2 8 , 2020

161 492 ( 2 8 ) (29)(30) (32) (33)

In re CERTIFIED QUESTIONS FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,

WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN,

SOUTHERN DIVISION

_________________________________________

MIDWEST INSTITUTE OF HEALTH, PLLC,

doing business as GRAND HEALTH PARTNERS,

WELLSTON MEDICAL CENTER, PLLC,

PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES, PC, and

JEFFERY GULICK,

Plaintiffs,

SC: 161492

v USDC

- WD: 1:20

- cv

- 414

GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN

ATTORNEY GENERAL, and MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

SERVICES DIRECTOR,

Defendants.

_________ _______________________________ _ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to supplement the appendix of the

Michigan Attorney General is GRANTED. The supplemental appendix submitted on

August 25 , 2020, is accepted for filing

. Further, t he motions for the temporary admission

of out

- of

- state attorneys Steven A. Zalesin a nd Ryan J. Sheehan to appear and practice in

this case un der MCR 8.126(A) are GRANTED. Finally, the separate motion s of (1) the

Michigan Nurses Association , (2) the American Legislative Exchange Council

, and (3) the

Election Integrity Fund to file brief s amicus curiae are GRANTED. The amicus brief s

submitted by those groups are accepted for filing.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification ofthe Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas Burakow, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| August 14, 2007 |   | /s/ Nicholas Burakow     |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                 |   | Nicholas Burakow, Ph.D., |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer  |

 

 

----
#### § 1.802-2 [Reserved]
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 202

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Sergeant at

Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 19 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of

a Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives be noti2 fied of the election of the Honorable Robert Laurent Be3 noit as Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
T. Lusardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


                                /s/ Kevin T. Lusardi
                                ------------------------------
                                Kevin T. Lusardi
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                August 5, 2004


                                       24
#### § 1.638-2 Effective date.

The specific requirements and limitations of § 1.638-1 apply on and after December 30, 1969.

[T.D. 7277, 38 FR 12742, May 15, 1973]
EXHIBIT 32


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GUNDAKER/JORDAN AMERICAN HOLDINGS,
INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, (the
"Report"), I, W. Neal Jordan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1)  The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


June 24, 2005



/s/ W. Neal Jordan
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial and
Accounting Officer
November 12, 2015

Dear Mr. Payson:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA

− 2015

− 0315). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has b een submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary in formation), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exe mptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by 11/27/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,
/S/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ECO2 Plastics,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), Raymond M. Salomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does
hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Raymond M. Salomon


By:
Raymond M. Salomon


Its:
Chief Financial Officer





Date: May
13, 2009





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ECO2
Plastics, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE DOMINION RESOURCES, INC. 
 NEW BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN 
 AMENDMENT, effective January 1, 2007, to the Dominion Resources, Inc. New Benefit Restoration Plan (the “Plan”). 
 Dominion Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan, as originally effective as of January 1, 2005. The Board of Directors of the Company or its delegate has the power (pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan) to
amend the Plan and has delegated certain authority to amend such plan to the Dominion Resources Services, Inc. CEO (the “Services CEO”). Pursuant to such delegation, the Services CEO can authorize amendments that do not materially increase
or enhance benefits to be provided under the Plan. 
 The Administrative Benefit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the
“Committee”) has the authority under the Plan to determine the actuarial and other factors to be used in calculating the lump-sum equivalent value of accrued Plan benefits. In its December 12, 2006 meeting, the Committee recommended
that a set rate of 4% be established for the actuarial discount rate for lump-sum distributions under the Plan during calendar years 2007 through 2009. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective January 1, 2007, Section 1.12 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 
 1.12 “Lump Sum Equivalent” means a single lump sum payment that is actuarially determined as the amount required to provide an after-tax monthly payment equal to the after-tax amount of the Monthly Benefit
payable for the period determined under Section 3.1(b). Effective for distributions occurring on or after January 1, 2007 and on or before December 31, 2009, unless otherwise determined by the Administrative Benefit Committee, the
actuarial discount rate for determinations of the Lump Sum Equivalent shall be 4 percent (4%). Beginning January 1, 2010, the actuarial discount rate shall be determined by the Administrative Benefit Committee. The actuarial determination shall
be computed using any other actuarial or other factors as determined by the Administrative Benefit Committee. The after-tax amounts shall be based on Federal income and FICA tax rates and the state income tax rate for the residence of the
Participant at the date of the payment, as determined by the Administrative Benefit Committee.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. PETER JAMES LITTLE , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 16

- 0176 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2001

- 005401 The Honorable Mark H. Brain , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix By Susan L. Luder Counsel for Respondent
Peter James Little , Tucson Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell and Chief Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 11-7-2017STATE v. LITTLE Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Peter James Little seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition s for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. Th ese are petitioner's fifth and sixth successive petition s

. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition s for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Mickey Bowman <mbowman@gosilver.com> 

Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:06 AM 

VanDerBellen, Alexander; Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Re: Meridian, MS EAS - Silver 

ZD I l HAY - I P I: 0 8 

Yes, Silver Airways is interested and would appreciate a two week extension if at all possible. 

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 

From: "V anDerBellen, Alexander" <sascha. vanderbellen@delta.com> 

Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 10:23:22-0400 

To: 'Kevin.Adams@dot.gov'<Kevin.Adams@dot.gov> 

Cc: 'mbowman@gosilver.com'<mbowman@gosilver.com> 

Subject: Meridian, MS EAS - Silver 

Kevin 

As mentioned, Silver is studying an EAS bid for Meridian. Mickey would like to request a two week extension. I am 

copying him here to confirm Silver's reque·st for extension of the bid deadline. 

Regards 

Sascha 

1