alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úřední věstník L 281/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0626 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | L 281 |
| | |
| České vydání | Právní předpisy | Ročník 6328. srpna 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0626

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

L 281

České vydání

Právní předpisy

Ročník 6328. srpna 2020

---

| Obsah | | II   Nelegislativní akty | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | MEZINÁRODNÍ DOHODY |
| | * | Informace o vstupu v platnost Dohody o ukončení platnosti dvoustranných dohod o investicích mezi členskými státy Evropské unie | 1 |

Obsah

II   Nelegislativní akty

Strana

MEZINÁRODNÍ DOHODY

*

Informace o vstupu v platnost Dohody o ukončení platnosti dvoustranných dohod o investicích mezi členskými státy Evropské unie

1

| CS | Akty, jejichž název není vytištěn tučně, se vztahují ke každodennímu řízení záležitostí v zemědělství a obecně platí po omezenou dobu.
  Názvy všech ostatních aktů jsou vytištěny tučně a předchází jim hvězdička. |
| --- | --- |

CS

Akty, jejichž název není vytištěn tučně, se vztahují ke každodennímu řízení záležitostí v zemědělství a obecně platí po omezenou dobu.

Názvy všech ostatních aktů jsou vytištěny tučně a předchází jim hvězdička.

---

II Nelegislativní akty

MEZINÁRODNÍ DOHODY

| 28.8.2020 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | L 281/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2020

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

L 281/1

---

Informace o vstupu v platnost Dohody o ukončení platnosti dvoustranných dohod o investicích mezi členskými státy Evropské unie

Dohoda o ukončení platnosti dvoustranných dohod o investicích mezi členskými státy Evropské unie, která byla podepsána dne 5. května 2020 v Bruselu (1), vstoupí v souladu s čl. 16 odst. 1 dohody v platnost dne 29. srpna 2020.

1

---

(1)  
  Úř. věst. L 169, 29.5.2020.

1

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 D0 30 1 . GEORGE BENJ A MI N v . EDEN ABEBE.

Geo rg e Ben

jam i n f i l ed t h i s ap pl i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary ap p eal fro m t h e

m ag i s t rat e co u rt ’ s J an u ar

y 1 6
, 2 0 1 9 o rd er g ran t i n g a w ri t o f p o s s es s io n. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. As a g en eral ru l e, “ [t ] h e o n l y av en u e o f ap p e a l av ai l ab le fro m [a] m ag i s t rat e

co u rt ju d g m en t i s p ro v i d ed b y OCGA § 1 5 -1 0 -4 1 (b ) (1 ), w hi ch al l o w s fo r a d e n o v o
ap p eal t o t h e s t at e o r s u p eri o r co u rt .” Ha nd l er v. Hu l s ey , 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p

. 7 51
, 7 5 1 (4 0 6
SE2 d 22 5 ) (1 9 9 1 ). If a part y i s ag g r i e v e d b y t h e d eci s io n o f t h e s t at e o r s u p eri o r

co u rt , an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal m ay b e fi l ed in t hi s Co urt

. See OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (a) (1 ), (1 1 ). Ho wev er, t h is Co urt m ay o n ly ad d res s m ag i s t rat e co urt m at t ers

t h at al read y h av e b een rev i ewed b y th e s t at e or s u p eri o r co u rt

. See Ha nd l er , 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p

. at 7 5 1 ; W

es t wi n d Co r

p

. v. W a s hi n g to n Fed

. S & L As s n

. , 1 9 5 Ga. Ap p

. 4 1 1
, 4 1 1 (1 ) (3 9 3 S E2 d 4 7 9) (1 9 9 0 ). Acco rd i n g l y , we lack j u ri sd i ct i o n t o co n s id er t h i s
ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. February 13, 2019

02/13/2019
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Beechport  Capital Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Hofmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael Hofmann
-------------------------
Michael Hofmann
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  August 12, 2002
<page>
									       EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Principal Plus
Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.







By:	/s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:	   Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	   President

Date:	   March 31, 2006
<PAGE>



                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                 ------------

                  FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                  ---------------------------------------------
                            FORM 10-Q MARCH 31, 2003
                            ------------------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fairfield Inn by Marriott
Limited Partnership, (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.


Date:  May 15, 2003                                  /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                     ---------------------
                                                         Michael L. Ashner
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 15, 2003                                  /s/ Thomas C. Staples
                                                     ---------------------
                                                         Thomas C. Staples
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 154 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 154

    To welcome the holding of democratic elections in Pakistan, to 
   congratulate Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the occasion of her 
                  swearing-in, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 21 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

    Mr. Pell (for himself, Mr. Helms, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Brown) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To welcome the holding of democratic elections in Pakistan, to 
   congratulate Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the occasion of her 
                  swearing-in, and for other purposes.

Whereas the United States and Pakistan have maintained close and cooperative 
        relations over many years;
Whereas the United States has a strong interest in strengthening democracy and 
        human rights in Pakistan;
Whereas Pakistan held elections for the National and Provincial Assemblies on 
        October 6 and 9, 1993, respectively;
Whereas the elections were observed by independent domestic monitors and by an 
        international delegation organized by the National Democratic Institute 
        for International Affairs (NDI);
Whereas the NDI delegation reported that ``the balloting was generally open, 
        orderly and well-administered,'' that ``election officials generally 
        carried out their tasks impartially and with diligence,'' and that the 
        announcement of results ``generally proceeded in accordance with the 
        law;''
Whereas the people of the United States enjoy an abiding friendship with the 
        people of Pakistan; and
Whereas the United States and Pakistan share a common interest in the promotion 
        of stability in Pakistan and the easing of tensions in the South Asia 
        region: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) welcomes the holding of elections on October 6 and 9, 
        1993, in Pakistan as an important step toward reaffirming 
        Pakistan's democratic course;
            (2) congratulates Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the 
        occasion of her swearing-in on October 19, 1993;
            (3) reaffirms the existing ties of friendship between the 
        peoples of Pakistan and the United States; and
            (4) underscores the continuing interest of the United 
        States in working with the government of Pakistan on issues of 
        bilateral and regional concern.

                                 <all>
```
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 18, 2012

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN HOWARDS, 

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL MCLAUGHLIN, in his

individual and official capacity;

ADAM DANIELS, in his individual

and official capacity, 

Defendants - Appellants.

VIRGIL D. "GUS" REICHLE, JR., in

his individual and official capacity;

DAN DOYLE, in his individual and

official capacity, 

Defendants.

-----------------------------

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; 

THE STATES OF COLORADO,

OKLAHOMA, UTAH, WYOMING,

SOUTH CAROLINA, AND

VERMONT, 

Amici Curiae.

___________________________

STEVEN HOWARDS, 

Plaintiff - Appellee,

No. 09-1201

(D.C. No. 1:06-CV-01964-CMA-CBS)

(D. Colo.)
v.

VIRGIL D. "GUS" REICHLE, JR., in

his individual and official capacity;

DAN DOYLE, in his individual and

official capacity, 

Defendants - Appellants, 

DANIEL MCLAUGHLIN, in his

individual and official capacity;

ADAM DANIELS, in his individual

and official capacity, 

Defendants.

------------------------------

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Amicus Curiae.

No. 09-1202

(D.C. No. 1:06-CV-01964-CMA-CBS)

(D.Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before KELLY, SEYMOUR, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.** 

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th

Cir. R. 32.1.

** After considering the Supreme Court’s opinion remanding this case, this

three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of

material assistance in the determination of these appeals. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The causes are therefore ordered submitted without

oral argument.

-2-
This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. In Howards v.

McLaughlin, 634 F.3d 1131 (10th Cir. 2011), we reversed the district court’s

denial of qualified immunity as to all Secret Service Agents on Mr. Howards’

Fourth Amendment claims, id. at 1143. We also reversed the district court’s

denial of qualified immunity on Mr. Howards’ First Amendment claim as to

Agents Daniels and McLaughlin, but affirmed such denial as to Agents Reichle

and Doyle. Id. at 1149-50.

The Supreme Court has now reversed our judgment, holding that Agents

Reichle and Doyle also are entitled to qualified immunity on the First Amendment

claim. Reichle v. Howards, 132 S. Ct. 2088, 2097 (2012). Accordingly, all these

defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

Therefore, we REVERSE the district court’s denial of qualified immunity

as to these defendants and REMAND for entry of judgment in favor of these

defendants.

Entered for the Court, 

Paul J. Kelly

Circuit Judge 

-3-
# C_2022128EN.01002501.xml

| 21.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/25

---

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2021 — Legakis and Others v Council

(Case T-765/14) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus - Statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus - Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus - Incorrect identification of the defendant - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 128/36)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicants: Georgios Legakis (Palaio Faliro, Greece), Myrto Panagiota Legaki (Palaio Faliro), Maria Legaki (Palaio Faliro), Melina Legaki (Palaio Faliro) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Gregorio Merino, E. Chatziioakeimidou, M. Balta and E. Dumitriu-Segnana, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION pursuant to Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 and the statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Georgios Legakis, Ms Myrto Panagiota Legaki, Ms Maria Legaki and Ms Melina Legaki shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Georgios Legakis, Ms Myrto Panagiota Legaki, Ms Maria Legaki and Ms Melina Legaki shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015.

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0348. HOWARD W. CLYDE, JR. v. THE STATE.

In 2009, Howard W.Clyde, Jr., pleaded guilty to terroristic threats and acts and

obstruction of an officer, and he received a sentence that included probation. In 2017,

the trial court revoked Clyde’s probation after he stipulated that he had committed a

new felony offense. Clyde filed a “Motion to Correct a Clerical Error,” arguing that

the revocation order was void because the State had subsequently dead docketed the

related criminal charges against him. On June 29, 2018, the trial court entered an

order denying Clyde’s motion, and on August 13, 2018,Clyde filed a notice of appeal

to this Court. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, an application for discretionary appeal is required to appeal orders

revoking probation. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5);see Todd v. State, 236 Ga. App. 757, 758

(513 SE2d 287) (1999) (holding that where the underlying subject matter is probation

revocation, the discretionary appeal procedure applies); accord White v. State, 233

Ga. App. 873, 874 (505 SE2d 228) (1998). The underlying subject matter of Clyde’s

“Motion to Correct a Clerical Error” was the revocation of his probation. Thus, a

discretionary application was required here.

Second, even if Clyde had a right of direct appeal, his notice of appeal was not

timely filed. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order

sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.

State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Clyde’s notice of appeal, filed 45

days after entry of the order denying his “Motion to Correct a Clerical Error,” was

untimely. 

September 20, 2018
For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/20/2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, January 27, 2009, 9 a.m. to January 27, 2009, 1 p.m., Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 12, 2008, Vol. 73, No. 240.                

The location of the meeting was changed to Rockville Hilton Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 22, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-1844 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Euroopan unionin L 272/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0812 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | L 272 |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Lainsäädäntö | 63. vuosikerta19. elokuu 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0812

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

L 272

Suomenkielinen laitos

Lainsäädäntö

63. vuosikerta19. elokuu 2020

---

| Sisältö | | Oikaisuja | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Oikaistaan Euroopan unionin lisätalousarvion nro 4 varainhoitovuodeksi 2020 lopullinen hyväksyminen (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 ( EUVL L 254, 4.8.2020 ) | 1 |

Sisältö

Oikaisuja

Sivu

*

Oikaistaan Euroopan unionin lisätalousarvion nro 4 varainhoitovuodeksi 2020 lopullinen hyväksyminen (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078 ( EUVL L 254, 4.8.2020 )

( EUVL L 254, 4.8.2020 )

1

| FI | Säädökset, joiden otsikot on painettu laihalla kirjasintyypillä, ovat maatalouspolitiikan alaan kuuluvia juoksevien asioiden hoitoon liityviä säädöksiä, joiden voimassaoloaika on yleensä rajoitettu.
  Kaikkien muiden säädösten otsikot on painettu lihavalla kirjasintyypillä ja merkitty tähdellä. |
| --- | --- |

FI

Säädökset, joiden otsikot on painettu laihalla kirjasintyypillä, ovat maatalouspolitiikan alaan kuuluvia juoksevien asioiden hoitoon liityviä säädöksiä, joiden voimassaoloaika on yleensä rajoitettu.

Kaikkien muiden säädösten otsikot on painettu lihavalla kirjasintyypillä ja merkitty tähdellä.

---

Oikaisuja

| 19.8.2020 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | L 272/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2020

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

L 272/1

---

Oikaistaan Euroopan unionin lisätalousarvion nro 4 varainhoitovuodeksi 2020 lopullinen hyväksyminen (EU, Euratom) 2020/1078

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti L 254, 4. elokuuta 2020
  )

Sivulla 36, rivillä ”Yhteensä”, sarakkeessa ”Talousarvio 2020 – Maksut”:

on:

”
  167 248 223 575
  ”

pitää olla:

”
  150 948 403 832
  ”

Sivulla 36, rivillä ”Yhteensä”, sarakkeessa ”Uusi määrä – Maksut”:

on:

”
  167 520 721 783
  ”

pitää olla:

”
  151 220 902 040
  ”

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VALENTINA S. MAXWELL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 16520

D.C. No.

2:14

- cv

- 02772

- TLN

- AC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018 **
San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Valentina S. Maxwell, a native and citizen of Russia, appeals pro se from the

district court’s dismissal of her complaint under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) requesting a

hearing on her naturalization application, for failure to state a claim. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 15 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 16520

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the dismissal of a

complaint for failure to state a claim. Yith v. Nielsen , 881 F.3d 1155, 1161 (9th Cir.

2018). We reverse.

The district court erred in dismissing Ma xwell’s complaint for failure to

state a claim, where the language of 8 U.S.C. § 1429 only bars the Attorney

General, and not the district court, from considering a naturalization application

when there is a removal proceeding pending against the applicant , and where

Maxwell was not in removal proceedings pursuant to a “warrant of arrest,” but

pursuant to a notice to appear. See 8 U.S.C. § 1429 ( “[ N]o application for

naturalization shall be considered by the Attorney General if there is pending

against the applicant a removal proceeding pursuant to a warrant of arrest issued

under the provisions of this chapter or any other Act.”); Yith , 881 F.3d at 1165,

1168 (the statutory language of 8 U.S.C. § 1429 applies only to the Attorney

General, not the district c ourt, and thus the district court is not prevented from

granting relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b); § 1429 is inapplicable to applicants in

proceedings pursuant to a notice to appear, which is different from a “warrant of

arrest”). Accordingly, we reverse th e district court and remand for further

proceedings consistent with this decision.

REVERSED and REMANDED.