alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel. Preparation and Distribution of Research Drug Products (N01DA-10-7772).                    

*Date:*                         August 25, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401. (301) 435-1439.                         *Lf33c.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 28, 2009.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-18493 Filed 8-4-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Date . Calibrator . Ambient Temperature, of . Barometric Press. (in. Hg) . Thern1ocoup1e 

### IDNumber. . Reference Thermometer Serial Number. . 12/8/2009 DJS/JB 60 29.87 Probe 38 7238
Reference Point Reference Thermocouple Temperature Number Source Thermometer Potentiometer Difference(a), Pass/Fail Temperature, of Temperature, of % Cold Warm Water 102.0 98.0 0.71 % PASS Warm Boiling Water 207.0 208.0 0.15 % PASS Hot Hot Peanut Oil 430.0 430.0 0.00 % PASS

la) [((Ref. Temp., OR)- (Test Thennocouple Temp., OR))! Ref. Temp., °R]*IOO, where OR= OF+460. Temperature difference must be < 1.50 %.

Signature Date 

# {II'"~ ."- ... ~,Date . Calibrator . Ambient Temperature, of . Barometric Press. (in. Hg) . Thermocouple ID Number.. . Reference Thermometer Serial Number. . 12/8/2009 DJSi.JB 60 29.87 Probe 42 7238
Reference Point Reference Thermocouple Temperature Source Thermometer Potentiometer Difference(a) Pass/Fail Number 

## , Temperature, of Temperature, of % Cold Warm Water 108.0 104.0 0.70 % PASS Warm Boiling Water 210.0 214.0 0.60 % PASS Hot Hot Peanut Oil 428.0 420.0 0.90 % PASS

(a) [((Ref. Temp., OR)

_(Test Thermocouple Temp., °R))/ Ref Temp., °R]* I00, where oR = of +460. Temperature difference must be < 1.50 %.

Date 

# if'""

• '

__ -·~IDate . Calibrator . Ambient Temperature, of . Barometric Press. (in. Hg) . Thermocoup 1 e

### ID Number . Reference Thermometer Serial Number. . 12/8/2009 DJS/.JB 60 29.87 Probe 48 7238
Reference Point Reference Thermocouple Temperature Number Source Thermometer Potentiometer Difference(a), Pass/Fail Temperature, of Temperature, of % Cold Warm Water 87.0 93.0 1.10% PASS Warm Boiling Water 209.0 209.0 0.00 % PASS Hot Hot Peanut Oil 446.0 446.0 0.00 % PASS

(a) [((Ref. Temp., OR)

_(Test Thermocouple Temp., °R))/ Ref. Temp., °R]*IOO, where oR = of +460. Temperature difference must be < 1.50 %.

Signature DateDate . Calibrator. . An1bient Temperature, of . Barometric Press. (in. Hg) . Thermocouple ID Number. . Reference Thermometer Serial Number. . 12/8/2009 DJS/JB 60 29.87 Probe 68 7238

Reference Point Reference Thermocouple Temperature Number Source Thermometer Potenti0meter Difference(a) , Pass/Fail Temperature, of Temperature, of % Cold Warm Water 105.0 108.0 0.53 % PASS Warm Boiling Water 211.0 215.0 0.60 % PASS Hot Hot Peanut Oil 425.0 435.0 1.13% PASS

(a) [((Ref. Temp., OR)- (Test Thermocouple Temp., °R))/ Ref. Temp., °R]*l 00, where oR= of +460. Temperature difference must be < 1.50 %.

Signatur~~ Date
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 94

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1993

Referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October

9, 1993, as ‘‘National Customer Service Week’’.

Whereas recognition of the value and importance of the customer raises the quality of customer service;

Whereas the high cost of attracting new customers today

heightens the need for companies to keep existing customers through effective customer service;

Whereas recognition of the contributions made by customer

service to the profitability of a company increases the

professional status of customer service;

Whereas excellent customer service distinguishes successful

companies that understand the important influence a customer has on the success of a company; and

Whereas excellent customer service can contribute to the

growth and success of every company: Now, therefore, be

it
2

•SJ 94 RFH

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9,

4 1993, is designated as ‘‘National Customer Service

5 Week’’. The President is authorized and requested to issue

6 a proclamation calling on the people of the United States

7 to observe the week with the appropriate ceremonies and

8 activities.

Passed the Senate September 10 (legislative day,

September 7), 1993.

Attest: WALTER J. STEWART,

Secretary.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41122

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDRES GILBERTO GARZA-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-79-ALL 

--------------------

Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andres Gilberto Garza-Lopez (Garza) appeals his guilty plea

conviction and sentence for unlawfully attempting to enter the

United States following deportation and removal and after having

been convicted of an aggravated felony, without having obtained

the consent of the Attorney General or the Secretary of the

Department of Homeland Security. Garza received a 16-level

sentence enhancement due to his prior conviction for attempt to

commit murder. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). He was
No. 04-41122

-2-

sentenced to 46 months of imprisonment and three years of

supervised release. Garza argues, for the first time on appeal,

that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), should be overruled, and that Blakely v. Washington, 124

S. Ct. 2531 (2004), should be held to apply to the Federal

Sentencing Guidelines.

Because Garza raises these issues for the first time on

appeal, we review only for plain error. See United States v.

Mares, __ F.3d __, No. 03-21035, 2005 WL 503715 at *7 (5th Cir.

Mar. 4, 2005), petition for cert. filed, No. 04-9517 (U.S. Mar.

31, 2005). Although the decision in Almendarez-Torres has been

called into question, see Shepard v. United States, 125 S. Ct.

1254, 1264 (2005) (Thomas, J., concurring), the Supreme Court has

not overruled it. Accordingly, Garza’s argument is foreclosed. 

See United States v. Rivera, 265 F.3d 310, 312

(5th Cir. 2001).

Garza contends that if Almendarez-Torres is overruled and

Blakely is held to apply to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, he

may not be sentenced based on any prior convictions to which he

does not admit or that are not found by a jury beyond a

reasonable doubt. Thus, Garza challenges only the fact of his

prior convictions. In United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738,

764 (2005), the Supreme Court did apply Blakely to the Federal

Sentencing Guidelines. However, because Almendarez-Torres has

not been overruled, Garza received zero criminal history points
No. 04-41122

-3-

due to the age of his prior convictions, and Garza is not

challenging the characterization of his prior conviction for

attempt to commit murder as a violent felony, he has not

established error, plain or otherwise, with respect to his

conviction and sentence. 

AFFIRMED.
#### Moore et al. *v.*Bible et al.

[No. 21,370.

Filed January 27, 1910.]

*Judgment.*— Form *of.*— Motions *to Modify.*— The remedy for a judgment which is not in proper form is a motion to modify.

Prom White Circuit Court; *James P. Wason,*Judge.

Highway petition by Evert Bible and others, against which Joseph T. Moore and another remonstrate. Prom a judgment for petitioners, remonstrants appeal.

*Affirmed.*

*Alfred W. Reynolds, Addison K. Sills*and *Addison E. Sills, Jr.,*for appellants.

*Palmer & Carr,*for appellees.

Montgomery, J.

This is a proceeding for the improvement of a highway less than three miles in length, begun before the Board of Commissioners of the County of White, and taken by appeal to the court below. Appellants’ motion to dismiss, and demurrer to, the petition were overruled, and the work ordered constructed, and these rulings have been assigned as errors. The real question involved is the validity of the law upon which the proceeding was founded, and that question has been decided adversely to appellants in the eases of *Smith*v. *Board, etc.*(1910), *ante,*364, and *Harmon*v. *Gephart*(1910), *ante,*391. Appellants’ counsel criticise the form of judgment entered by the court below, but no motion to modify the same was made, and no question in that respect is presented for review. Upon the authority of the cases cited the judgment herein is affirmed.
§ 1.475(c)-2 Definitions—security. ( a ) *Items that are not securities.* The following items are not securities within the meaning of section 475(c)(2) with respect to a taxpayer and, therefore, are not subject to section 475— ( 1 ) A security (determined without regard to this paragraph (a)) if section 1032 prevents the taxpayer from recognizing gain or loss with respect to that security;
( 2 ) A debt instrument issued by the taxpayer (including a synthetic debt instrument, within the meaning of § 1.1275-6(b)(4), that § 1.1275-6(b) treats the taxpayer as having issued); or
( 3 ) A REMIC residual interest, or an interest or arrangement that is determined by the Commissioner to have substantially the same economic effect, if the residual interest or the interest or arrangement is acquired on or after January 4, 1995.
( b ) *Synthetic debt that § 1.1275-6(b) treats the taxpayer as holding.* If § 1.1275-6 treats a taxpayer as the holder of a synthetic debt instrument (within the meaning of § 1.1275-6(b)(4)), the synthetic debt instrument is a security held by the taxpayer within the meaning of section 475(c)(2)(C).
( c ) *Negative value REMIC residuals acquired before January 4, 1995.* A REMIC residual interest that is described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section or an interest or arrangement that is determined by the Commissioner to have substantially the same economic effect is not a security within the meaning of section 475(c)(2). ( 1 ) *Description.* A residual interest in a REMIC is described in this paragraph (c)(1) if, on the date the taxpayer acquires the residual interest, the present value of the anticipated tax liabilities associated with holding the interest exceeds the sum of— ( i ) The present value of the expected future distributions on the interest; and
( ii ) The present value of the anticipated tax savings associated with holding the interest as the REMIC generates losses.
( 2 ) *Special rules applicable to negative value REMIC residuals acquired before January 4, 1995.* Solely for purposes of this paragraph (c)— ( i ) If a transferee taxpayer acquires a residual interest with a basis determined by reference to the transferor's basis, then the transferee is deemed to acquire the interest on the date the transferor acquired it (or is deemed to acquire it under this paragraph (c)(2)(i)).
( ii ) Anticipated tax liabilities, expected future distributions, and anticipated tax savings are determined under the rules in § 1.860E-2(a)(3) and without regard to the operation of section 475.
( iii ) Present values are determined under the rules in § 1.860E-2(a)(4).
[T.D. 8700, 61 FR 67725, Dec. 24, 1996]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8068 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8068

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
  to exclude resources designated as an emergency requirement or any 
    resources provided in supplemental appropriations laws from CBO 
 baseline projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2024

Mr. Grothman (for himself, Mr. Cloud, Ms. Mace, Mr. Norman, Mr. Ogles, 
Mr. Weber of Texas, and Mr. Case) introduced the following bill; which 
              was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
  to exclude resources designated as an emergency requirement or any 
    resources provided in supplemental appropriations laws from CBO 
 baseline projections for discretionary appropriations, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Baseline Bloat Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. CHANGES IN THE BASELINE.

    Section 257(c) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 907(C)) is amended in the second sentence of 
paragraph (1) by inserting ``excluding resources designated as an 
emergency requirement and any resources provided in supplemental 
appropriation laws,'' after ``current year,''.
                                 <all>
```
| (logo) **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February6, 2019

 

 

WellsFargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn:AJ Sfarra

375Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

NewYork, NY 10152

 

RE:        Annual Statement as to Compliance

              WFCM 2015 NXS3

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS3,as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB(the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereofthat:

 

a.       Areview of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilledall obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2019.

 

 

Bestregards,

/s/Karyn Mann

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
# C_2014448EN.01004101.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/41

---

Action brought on 29 September 2014 — ZZ and Others v Council

(Case F-100/14)

(2014/C 448/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for a declaration that Article 7 of Annex V to the Staff Regulations of Officials, as amended by Regulation No 1023/2013 of the Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials and the CEOS, and Article 8 of Annex VII thereto, are inapplicable, and for the annulment of the decisions withdrawing entitlement to reimbursement of travel expenses from the place of employment to the place of origin and withdrawing entitlement to travelling time.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:

| — | Declare unlawful Article 7 of Annex V to the Staff Regulations and Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare unlawful Article 7 of Annex V to the Staff Regulations and Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | Annul the decision not to award from 2014 onwards any travelling time or the reimbursement of annual travel expenses to the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision not to award from 2014 onwards any travelling time or the reimbursement of annual travel expenses to the applicants;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

---
#### § 1.707-2 Disguised payments for services. [Reserved]
### www.lilly.com 

# i %

M , El i Lill yan d Compan y Lill yCorporat e Cente r ^cp fr•'OFliAriOi' i Indianapolis , Indian a 4628 5 "'•-' ' ' -I ; U.S.A
. Phon e 31 7 27 6 200 0 Marc h 9 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHood , Secretary Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor to fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYork' s Joh n F
. Kenned yInternationa l Airpor tan d Los Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor ta tHaneda
. I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsucces s las tDecembe ri n reachin g a landmar k

Ope n Skie s agreemen twit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e by U.S
. airlines
. I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Ne wYor k an d Lo s Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s financia l an d commerc e centers
. Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen tt o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket
. America n i s likewis e committe d t o Ne wYor k an d Lo s Angele s - bot h vita l foca l point s o f business , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n - providin g unsurpasse d ai rservic e sinc e th e mid-1900 s Bot h th e Ne wYor k

an d Lo s Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan teconomi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , as wil l American' s customer s an d employees
. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e JFK/Haned a connectio n a reality
. Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d it s reques tfo rslot s t o fl yfro m Kenned yt o Haneda !

le y Director , Trave l & Meetin g Service s ELI LILL YAN D COMPAN Y

Answer s Tha tMatter
.
<PAGE>   1
                           IBIS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

                   STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS

                                   EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                              MARCH 31,
                                                    -------------------------------
                                                       1996                1997
                                                    -----------         -----------

<S>                                                 <C>                 <C>
Net loss ...................................        $  (284,210)        $  (437,363)
                                                    ===========         ===========


Primary and fully diluted loss per share:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding          3,518,746           5,190,839
                                                    ===========         ===========

Net loss per common share ..................        $     (0.08)        $     (0.08)
                                                    ===========         ===========
</TABLE>



                                       15
<PAGE>





                                  Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milestone Scientific Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the Nine months ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Cohn, Chief Financial Officer of Milestone, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of Milestone.


                              /s/ David Cohn
                              -----------------------------
                              David Cohn
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              November 20, 2006
#### § 1.6041-9 Coordination with reporting rules for widely held fixed investment trusts under § 1.671-5.

See § 1.671-5 for the reporting rules for widely held fixed investment trusts (WHFIT) (as defined under that section). For purposes of section 6041, middlemen and trustees of WHFITs are deemed to have management and oversight functions in connection with payments made by the WHFIT.

[T.D. 9241, 71 FR 4024, Jan. 24, 2006]