alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.6033-5 Disclosure by tax-exempt entities that are parties to certain reportable transactions. ( a ) *In general.* Every tax-exempt entity (as defined in section 4965(c)) shall file with the IRS on Form 8886-T, “Disclosure by Tax-Exempt Entity Regarding Prohibited Tax Shelter Transaction” (or a successor form), in accordance with this section and the instructions to the form, a disclosure of— ( 1 ) Such entity's being a party (as defined in § 53.4965-4 of this chapter) to a prohibited tax shelter transaction (as defined in section 4965(e)); and
( 2 ) The identity of any other party (whether taxable or tax-exempt) to such transaction that is known to the tax-exempt entity.
( b ) *Frequency of disclosure.* A single disclosure is required for each prohibited tax shelter transaction.
( c ) *By whom disclosure is made* — ( 1 ) *Tax-exempt entities referred to in section 4965(c)(1), (2) or (3).* In the case of tax-exempt entities referred to in section 4965(c)(1), (2) or (3), the disclosure required by this section must be made by the entity.
( 2 ) *Tax-exempt entities referred to in section 4965(c)(4), (5), (6) or (7).* In the case of tax-exempt entities referred to in section 4965(c)(4), (5), (6) or (7), including a fully self-directed qualified plan, IRA, or other savings arrangement, the disclosure required by this section must be made by the entity manager (as defined in section 4965(d)(2)) of the entity.
( d ) *Time and place for filing* — ( 1 ) *In general.* The disclosure required by this section shall be filed on or before May 15 of the calendar year following the close of the calendar year during which the tax-exempt entity entered into the prohibited tax shelter transaction.
( 2 ) *Subsequently listed transactions.* In the case of subsequently listed transactions (as defined in section 4965(e)(2)), the disclosure required by this section shall be filed on or before May 15 of the calendar year following the close of the calendar year during which the transaction was identified by the Secretary as a listed transaction.
( 3 ) *Transition rule.* If a tax-exempt entity entered into a prohibited tax shelter transaction after May 17, 2006, and before January 1, 2007, the disclosure required by this section shall be filed on or before November 2, 2007.
( 4 ) *No disclosure.* Disclosure is not required with respect to any prohibited tax shelter transaction entered into by a tax-exempt entity on or before May 17, 2006.
( e ) *Penalty for failure to provide disclosure statement.* See section 6652(c)(3) for the penalty applicable to the failure to disclose a prohibited tax shelter transaction in accordance with this section.
( f ) *Effective date/applicability date.* This section applies with respect to transactions entered into by a tax-exempt entity after May 17, 2006.
[T.D. 9492, 75 FR 38702, July 6, 2010]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10293-10294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of Biotechnology Activities; Office of Science Policy; 
Office of the Director; Notice of a Meeting of the NIH Blue Ribbon 
Panel

    The purpose of this notice is to inform the public about a meeting 
of the NIH Blue Ribbon Panel To Advise on the Risk Assessment of the 
National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories at Boston University

[[Page 10294]]

Medical Center. The meeting will be held on Friday, March 19, 2010, at 
the National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Floor 
6C, Room 6, Bethesda, MD 20892, from approximately 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    This meeting is the second in a series of public meetings with the 
National Research Council to review the ongoing supplementary risk 
assessment study. It was originally scheduled to take place on February 
12, 2010, but had to be postponed due to extreme weather conditions on 
the East Coast.
    Signup for public comment will begin at approximately 8 a.m. In the 
event that time does not allow for all those interested in presenting 
oral comments, anyone may file written comments using the following 
address below.
    An agenda and slides for the meeting may be obtained prior to the 
meeting by connecting to http://nihblueribbonpanel-bumc-neidl.od.nih.gov/. For additional information concerning this meeting, 
please contact Ms. Laurie Lewallen, Advisory Committee Coordinator, 
Office of Biotechnology Activities, Office of Science Policy, Office of 
the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 
750, Bethesda, MD 20892-7985; telephone 301-496-9838; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a7cbc2d0c6cbcbc2c9cbe7c8c389c9cecf89c0c8d1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8d4ddcfd9d4d4ddd6d4f8d7dc96d6d1d096dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 1, 2010.
Amy P. Patterson,
Director, Office of Biotechnology Activities, National Institutes of 
Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-4724 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7667** 

LATIF RASHE’D , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; FRED SCHILLING, Medical Director, Virginia Department of Corre ctions; LAYTON LESTER, Warden, James River Correctional Center; WILLIAM V. PURCELL, Physician, James River Correcti o nal Center; B. RAGLAND, Assistant Warden, James River Correctional Center , Defendants

– Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States Dis trict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Anthony John Trenga , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv - 00571

- AJT

- IDD )

Submitted : April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Aff irmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Latif Rashe’d, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Latif Rashe’d appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or to appl y to proceed in forma pauperis . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. As the district court dismissed Rashe’d’s complaint without prejudice, his remedy is to refile his

com plaint along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis

or submit the required filing fee. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rashe’d v. Johnson , No. 1:09

- cv - 00571

- AJT

- IDD (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2009 & entered Aug . 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00043-CR

CLIFFORD DEAN COGDILL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 413th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F43605

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Clifford Dean Cogdill attempts to appeal from his conviction in August of 2010. 

By letter dated February 22, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Cogdill that the 

appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that the notice of appeal was 

untimely and that the trial court’s certificate of right of appeal indicated that Cogdill 

waived his right to appeal and had no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); 

25.2(d). The Clerk also warned Cogdill that the appeal would be dismissed unless, 

within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for 
Cogdill v. State Page 2

continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3. We received a response from Cogdill; 

however, it does not provide grounds for continuing the appeal. 

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 16, 2011

Do not publish 

[CR25]
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement



 
EXHIBIT 10.2

 
THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 
This Third Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and
entered into as of January 22, 2003, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (“Employer”) and Allan C. Youngberg (“Executive”). 
 
Recitals 
 

	A)	 	On July 23, 1999, an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive; 

 

	B)	 	On September 26, 2001, a First Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive; 

 

	C)	 	Pursuant to a Memorandum dated October 16, 2001, Executive’s Annual Base Salary was increased to $210,000, effective as of September 1, 2001;


 

	D)	 	On November 19, 2002, a Second Amendment to Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive; 

 

	E)	 	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow: 

 
Agreement 
 

	1.	 	Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides: 

 
2.1 Salary. For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $210,000 during
each year of the Employment Term. Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall
determine. 
 
is hereby amended,
effective January 22, 2003, to provide as follows: 
 
2.1 Salary. For Executive’s services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $217,500 during each year of the Employment Term. Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in
conformity with Employer’s normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine. 
 

	2.	 	All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective. 

 
Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.

 

	 EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 	 EMPLOYER

	
	 	 	 	 	 PRICESMART, INC.

	
	 Allan C. Youngberg
	 	 	 	 By: /s/    ROBERT M. GANS

	
	 /s/    ALLAN C. YOUNGBERG
	 	 	 	 Name: Robert M. Gans

	
	 	 	 	 	 Its: Executive Vice President
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 08, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 08, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A2183. WILLIAM DURDEN v. GARY CAMPBELL et al..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
§ 74.1306 D&C Red No. 6. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive D&C Red No. 6 is principally the disodium salt of 3-hydroxy-4-[(4-methyl-2-sulfophenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid (CAS Reg. No. 5858-81-1). To manufacture the additive, 2-amino-5-methylbenzenesulfonic acid is diazotized with hydrochloric acid and sodium nitrite. The diazo compound is coupled in alkaline medium with 3-hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid. The resulting dye precipitates as the disodium salt.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with D&C Red No. 6 may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in part 73 of this chapter as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* The color additive D&C Red No. 6 shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such impurities may be avoided by current good manufacturing practice: Sum of volatile matter (at 135 °C) and chlorides and sulfates (calculated as sodium salts), not more than 10 percent. 1-[(4-methylphenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenol, not more than 0.015 percent. 2-Amino-5-methylbenzenesulfonic acid, sodium salt, not more than 0.2 percent. 3-Hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid, sodium salt, not more than 0.4 percent. 3-Hydroxy-4-[(4-methylphenyl)azo]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid, sodium salt, not more than 0.5 percent. *p-* Toluidine, not more than 15 parts per million. Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million. Total color, not less than 90 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* The color additive D&C Red No. 6 may be safely used for coloring drugs such that the combined total of D&C Red No. 6 and D&C Red No. 7 does not exceed 5 milligrams per daily dose of the drug.
( d ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Certification.* All batches of D&C Red No. 6 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
[47 FR 57687, Dec. 28, 1982, as amended at 77 FR 39923, July 6, 2012]
#### § 1.511-1 Imposition and rates of tax.

Section 511(a) imposes a tax upon the unrelated business taxable income of certain organizations otherwise exempt from Federal income tax. Under section 511(a)(1), organizations described in section 511(a)(2)(A) and in paragraph (a) of § 1.511-2 and organizations described in section 511(a)(2)(B) are subject to normal tax and surtax at the corporate rates provided by section 11. Under section 511(b)(1), trusts described in section 511(b)(2) are subject to tax at the individual rates prescribed in section 1(d) of the Code as amended by the Tax Reform Act of 1969 (section 1 for taxable years ending before Jan. 1, 1971). The deduction for personal exemption provided in section 642(b) in the case of a trust taxable under subchapter J, chapter 1 of the Code, is not allowed in computing unrelated business taxable income.

[T.D. 7117, 36 FR 9421, May 25, 1971]
#### § 1.663(c)-6 Effective dates.

Sections 1.663(c)-1 through 1.663(c)-5 are applicable for estates and qualified revocable trusts within the meaning of section 645(b)(1) with respect to decedents who die on or after December 28, 1999. However, for estates and qualified revocable trusts with respect to decedents who died after the date that section 1307 of the Tax Reform Act of 1997 became effective but before December 28, 1999, the IRS will accept any reasonable interpretation of the separate share provisions, including those provisions provided in 1999-11 I.R.B. 41 (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter). For trusts other than qualified revocable trusts, § 1.663(c)-2 is applicable for taxable years of such trusts beginning after December 28, 1999.

[T.D. 8849, 64 FR 72545, Dec. 28, 1999; 65 FR 16317, Mar. 28, 2000]
§ 1.455-3 Method of allocation. ( a ) Prepaid subscription income to which section 455 applies shall be included in gross income for the taxable years during which the liability to which the income relates is discharged or is deemed to be discharged on the basis of the taxpayer's experience.
( b ) For purposes of determining the period or periods over which the liability of the taxpayer extends, and for purposes of allocating prepaid subscription income to such periods, the taxpayer may aggregate similar transactions during the taxable year in any reasonable manner, provided the method of aggregation and allocation is consistently followed.
[T.D. 6591, 27 FR 1798, Feb. 27, 1962]
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 178

Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is

assembled.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of

the Senate is assembled.

1 Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of

2 Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is assembled

3 and that the Senate is ready to proceed to business.

Æ
#### § 1.6050P-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the major captions that appear in §§ 1.6050P-1 and 1.6050P-2.

## § 1.6050P-1 Information reporting for discharges of indebtedness by certain entities.

(a) Reporting requirement.

(1) In general.

(2) No aggregation.

(3) Amounts not includible in income.

(4) Time and place for reporting.

(i) In general.

(ii) Indebtedness discharged in bankruptcy.

(b) Date of discharge.

(1) In general.

(2) Identifiable events.

(i) In general.

(ii) Statute of limitations.

(iii) Decision to discontinue collection activity; creditor's defined policy.

(iv) Expiration of non-payment testing period.

(v) Special rule for certain entities required to file in a year prior to 2008.

(3) Permitted reporting.

(c) Indebtedness.

(d) Exceptions from reporting requirement.

(1) Certain bankruptcy discharges.

(i) In general.

(ii) Business or investment debt.

(2) Interest.

(3) Non-principal amounts in lending transactions.

(4) Indebtedness of foreign persons held by foreign branches of U.S. financial institutions.

(i) Reporting requirements.

(ii) Definition.

(5) Acquisition of indebtedness by related party.

(6) Releases.

(7) Guarantors and sureties.

(e) Additional rules.

(1) Multiple debtors.

(i) In general.

(ii) Amount to be reported.

(2) Multiple creditors.

(i) In general.

(ii) Partnerships.

(iii) Pass-through securitized indebtedness arrangement.

(A) Reporting requirements.

(B) Definition.

(iv) REMICs.

(v) No double reporting.

(3) Coordination with reporting under section 6050J.

(4) Direct or indirect subsidiary.

(5) Entity formed or availed of to hold indebtedness.

(6) Use of magnetic media.

(7) TIN solicitation requirement.

(i) In general.

(ii) Manner of soliciting TIN.

(8) Recordkeeping requirements.

(9) No multiple reporting.

(f) Requirement to furnish statement.

(1) In general.

(2) Furnishing copy of Form 1099-C.

(3) Time and place for furnishing statement.

(g) Penalties.

(h) Effective/applicability date.

## § 1.6050P-2 Organization a significant trade or business of which is the lending of money.

(a) In general.

(b) Safe harbors.

(1) Organizations not subject to section 6050P in the previous calendar year.

(2) Organizations that were subject to section 6050P in the previous calendar year.

(3) No test year.

(c) Seller financing.

(d) Gross income from lending of money.

(e) Acquisition of an indebtedness from a person other than the debtor included in lending money.

(f) Test year.

(g) Predecessor organization.

(h) Examples.

(i) Effective date.

[T.D. 8654, 61 FR 268, Jan. 4, 1996, as amended by T.D. 9160, 69 FR 62185, Oct. 25, 2004; T.D. 9430, 73 FR 66540, Nov. 10, 2008; T.D. 9461, 74 FR 47728, Sept. 17, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,821,874
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         100,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,666,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,416,646
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     70,825,990
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,440,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,775,244
<DEPOSITS>                                  80,368,987
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            721,901
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,767,085
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,917,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              87,775,244
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,619,371
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              308,590
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,927,961
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,893,689
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,893,955
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,034,006
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  289,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,011,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                984,199
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     984,199
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   522,524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.84
<LOANS-NON>                                    419,801
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                419,801
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,200,398
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  105,656
<RECOVERIES>                                    56,662
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,440,864
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,415,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         25,864
        

</TABLE>
#### Tyler *v.*State

[No. 17,432.

Filed October 22, 1945.]

[For opinion transferring the cause to the Appellate Court, see 223 Ind. 519.]

*Walter J. Bixler,*of Peru, for appellant.

*James A. Emmert,*Attorney General, *Frank E. Coughlin,*First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Flanagan, J.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury in the Miami Circuit Court of contributing to the delinquency of her minor children. From the judgment which following she appeals, assigning as error (1), the overruling of her motion to quash the indictment, and (2), the overruling of her motion for a new trial.

The Miami Circuit Court was sitting as a juvenile court. Upon appeal the only assignment of error allowed by statute is that the decision of the court is contrary to law. *Blake*v. *State*(1943), 114 Ind. App. 1, 48 N. E. (2d) 651. No question is therefore presented.

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 63 N. E. (2d^ 145.