alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014303EN.01005101.xml

| 8.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/51

---

Action brought on 13 July 2014 — Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v OHIM — Continental Reifen Deutschland (XKING)

(Case T-525/14)

2014/C 303/60

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin (Clermont-Ferrand, France) (represented by: L. Carlini, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH (Hannover, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 May 2014 given in Case R 1522/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 May 2014 given in Case R 1522/2013-4;

| — | Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings, should it intervene, to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings, should it intervene, to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘XKING’ for goods in Class 12 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 6 44  821

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trademarks Nos 5 2 93  782 and 5 5 60  396, national marks an international registrations

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (5) CTMR

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Itec Environmental Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary M. De Laurentiis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gary M. De Laurentiis
--------------------------
Gary M. De Laurentiis
Chief Executive Officer

May 22, 2003
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0159. ALBERT GRAVITT v. MASTEC NORTH AMERICA INC.

Albert Gravitt seeks discretionary review of the superior court’s order

remanding his case to the State Board of Workers’ Compensation, which previously

denied his request for workers’ compensation benefits. Based on our review of the

record and the procedural posture of this case, we conclude that Gravitt’s request for

appellate review is premature. Consequently, this application is herebyDISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/23/2015

December 23, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0543

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN GUY ZENO SHAWN WOLF MASON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 25 2023

05/25/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0543
# C_2015381EN.01006005.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/60

---

Order of the General Court of 24 September 2015 — Primo Valore v Commission

(Case T-630/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 381/83)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Western Land and Recreation, Inc. (the
Company) for the three months ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay N. Torok, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Jay N. TorokJay N. TorokChairman of the Board andPrincipal Executive OfficerFebruary 17, 2005
 This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge
standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose. This certification is not being filed
as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133727 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133727 COA: 266809 Oakland CC: 2005-202766-FH STANLEY EARL DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 15, 2007 judgment order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presente d should be reviewed by this Court.

s0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 15, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 15, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0071. BEVERLY KERN, et al. v. PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, INC., et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 20120293 20120292
Motion for Rehearing Granted, Memorandum Opinion filed July 6, 2021 ,

Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated, and Order filed July 29, 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00796

- CV

____________ SARAH GARNELO , Appellant

V.
URBAN SO UTHWEST TOWNSHIP APARTMENTS GP, LLC D/B/A

TOWNSHIP APARTMENTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th Distri ct Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 43220



### ORDER

On July 6, 2021 , this c ourt issued an opin ion dismissing this appeal. On July 13 , 2021 , appellant filed a motion for rehearing. The motion is GRANTED

. This c ourt ’ s opinion filed July 6 , 20 21 , is WITHDRAWN , and our judgment of that date is VACATED. The appeal is ordered REINSTATED.

PER CURIAM

P anel Consists of Justices Chief Justi ce Christopher and Justices Spain and Wilson.
#### § 1.528-7 Inurement.

An organization is not a homeowners association if any part of its net earnings inures (other than as a direct result of its engaging in one or more exempt functions) to the benefit of any private person. Thus, to the extent that members receive a benefit from the general maintenance, etc., of association property, this benefit generally would not constitute inurement. If an organization pays rebates from amounts other than exempt function income, such rebates will constitute inurement. In general, in determining whether an organization is in violation of this section, the principles used in making similar determinations under Section 501(c) will be applied.

[T.D. 7692, 45 FR 26323, Apr. 18, 1980]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 21 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 21

 To authorize testimony and to authorize representation by the Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony and to authorize representation by the Senate 
                             Legal Counsel.

Whereas, the parties in Willey v. Riley, et al., numbered LA 18962, pending in 
        the Iowa district court for Linn County, seek the deposition testimony 
        of Senator Grassley;
Whereas, by rule VI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no Senator shall absent 
        himself from the service of the Senate without leave;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2)), the Senate may direct its 
        counsel to represent Members of the Senate with respect to requests for 
        testimony made to them in their official capacities: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That Senator Grassley is authorized to testify at a 
deposition in Willey v. Riley, et al., case numbered LA 18962 (Iowa 
D.Ct.), except when his attendance at the Senate is necessary for the 
performance of his legislative duties, and except concerning matters 
for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Senator 
Grassley in connection with his testimony in the case of Willey v. 
Riley, et al.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION     I, Edward P. Smolyansky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Lifeway Foods, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for nine month period ended September 30, 2006:     (1) Fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     (2) that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.Date:November 20, 2006              /s/ Edward P. Smolyansky   Chief Financial and Accounting Officer   and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ECO2 Plastics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Rodney S. Rougelot, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Rodney S. Rougelot___________________________


By: Rodney S. Rougelot


Its: Chief Executive Officer





Date: August 19, 2009





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ECO2 Plastics, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5441

_____________________________ S T

. J AMES H EALTHCARE G ROUP , I NC

. d/b/a St. James Health and Rehabilitation Center on behalf of Betty Roberts,

Appellant,

v.

D EPAR TMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES , S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Department of Children and Families

. Melissa Roedel, Hearing Officer

. December 3, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , K ELSEY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Elizabeth Margaret Boyle, Osprey
, for Appellant.

Camille Larson
, Assistant R egion Counsel, NW Region, Tallahassee, f or Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 129

To designate both the month of August 1993 and the month of August 1994 
            as ``National Slovak American Heritage Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 1 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

    Mr. Wofford (for himself and Mr. Pell) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To designate both the month of August 1993 and the month of August 1994 
            as ``National Slovak American Heritage Month''.

Whereas Stefan Parmenius Stitnicky, a Slovak chronologist and author of the poem 
        ``De Navigatione'', came to the New World as a member of Sir Humphrey 
        Gilbert's expedition in 1583;
Whereas Jan Boda, Stefan Mada, and other Slovaks were among the first settlers 
        of Jamestown, Virginia in 1609;
Whereas Slovak immigrants came to North America in great numbers seeking 
        religious, economic, and political freedom and, since the birth of this 
        Nation, have labored diligently for the betterment of America;
Whereas the history of the Slovak people in the United States reflects a hard-
        working and honorable presence for over 200 years and includes service 
        in all of the Nation's wars, including the American Revolution;
Whereas Slovak-Americans, who comprise the second largest Slav ethnic group in 
        America, have distinguished themselves by contributing to the 
        development of the sciences, arts, literature, government, military 
        service, athletics, and education in the United States; and
Whereas in 1993 and 1994, Slovak-Americans celebrate the independence of 
        Slovakia and the centennials of Slovak churches, newspapers, and 
        fraternal organizations in the United States and, in doing so, proudly 
        proclaim their pride in being Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the months of August 1993 and August 1994 are each 
designated as ``National Slovak American Heritage Month''. The 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
on the people of the United States to observe these months with 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
#### §§ 1.484-1.500 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 19 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 19

    To make majority party appointments to Senate committees under 
paragraph 3 (a) and (b) of rule XXV for the One Hundred Third Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

 Mr. Mitchell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To make majority party appointments to Senate committees under 
paragraph 3 (a) and (b) of rule XXV for the One Hundred Third Congress.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the committees for the One Hundred Third Congress, or 
until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Sasser (chairman), Mr. Hollings, Mr. 
Johnston, Mr. Riegle, Mr. Exon, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Simon, Mr. Conrad, 
Mr. Dodd, Mr. Sarbanes, Mrs. Boxer, and Ms. Murray.
    Committee on Rules and Administration: Mr. Ford (chairman), Mr. 
Pell, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Inouye, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Dodd, Ms. 
Feinstein, and Mr. Mathews.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Bumpers (chairman), Mr. Nunn, Mr. 
Levin, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Kerry of Massachusetts, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
Wellstone, Mr. Wofford, Mr. Heflin, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Kohl, and Ms. 
Moseley-Braun.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Rockefeller (chairman), Mr. 
DeConcini, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Graham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Daschle, and Mr. 
Campbell.
    Special Committee on Aging: Mr. Pryor (chairman), Mr. Glenn, Mr. 
Bradley, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Reid, Mr. Graham, 
Mr. Kohl, Mr. Feingold, and Mr. Krueger.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 810 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 810

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to repeal the authority 
   of the President to assume emergency control of the police of the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to repeal the authority 
   of the President to assume emergency control of the police of the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Police Home 
Rule Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY OF PRESIDENT TO ASSUME EMERGENCY CONTROL OF 
              POLICE OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) Repeal of Authority.--The District of Columbia Home Rule Act is 
amended by striking section 740 (sec. 1-207.40, D.C. Official Code).
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents of such Act is 
amended by striking the item relating to section 740.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-006-CV

NO. 2-06-155-CV

Ex Parte S.R.D., a child

In the Interest of B.G.D. a/k/a S.R.D., A Child	APPELLANT

	----------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY	NO. 2-006  -04400    07-379              -CV

JOSEPH H. LEE, III, VIRGINIA K. LEE AND 	APPELLANTS

PATRICIA LEE BARROW AND SAVINGS 

OF AMERICA, INC.	SaAmM C. TaAmMbBoOrReElLlLoO	   APPELLANT	

	V.

 OPAL LEE, IN HER CAPACITY AS 	APPELLEE

 LoOwWeE'sS CoOmMpPaAnNiIeEsS, InNcC., RaAyY 

CrRaAwWfFoOrRdD, 	APPELLEES

LiInNdDaA BlLaAcCkK, aAnNdD DaAvViIdD MaArRrRsSTEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF DALE T. LEE, DECEASED	

	----------

	FROM THE271STTHE 271ST DISTRICT          PROBATE COURT  NO. 2 OF WISE                     TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered THE the parties’ Pappellant’s’ “Joint Motion To Dismiss aAppealBy aAgreementNotice Of Nonsuit.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(12), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants [ [oOR the the party incurring the same], for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   WALKER, J. ; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.;

    HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER                                     , JJ.

DELIVERED:    September 28, 2006  December 713, 2007