alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         162,360                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  722,930                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,288                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,917,605                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,807,749                       0
<PP&E>                                         144,413                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,612                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,955,757                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,928,206                       0
<BONDS>                                        693,152                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           592                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     322,181                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,955,757                       0
<SALES>                                      3,307,195               2,839,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,307,195               2,839,382
<CGS>                                        3,169,762               2,719,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,169,762               2,719,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,313                  74,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,682                     703
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,876                  10,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,244                  34,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,053                  13,238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,191                  21,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,191                  21,599
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50                     .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49                     .42


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 106 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 106

   To authorize testimony by and representation of Senate employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 6 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

 Mr. Ford (for Mr. Mitchell) (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To authorize testimony by and representation of Senate employees.

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Thomas F. Weiss, Case No. M-772-93, 
        pending in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, subpoenas for 
        testimony have been issued to Mary Jane Hatcher, David Hauck, Mary Beth 
        Markey, Sandra Mason, and Ursula McManus, employees of the Senate on the 
        staff of the Committee on Foreign Relations;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from 
        such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2)(1988), the Senate 
        may direct its counsel to represent committees, Members, officers and 
        employees of the Senate with respect to subpoenas or orders issued to 
        them in their official capacity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That Mary Jane Hatcher, David Hauck, Mary Beth Markey, 
Sandra Mason, and Ursula McManus, and any other employee of the Senate 
who is subpoenaed to testify, are authorized to testify in the case of 
United States v. Thomas F. Weiss, except concerning matters for which a 
privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent Mary 
Jane Hatcher, David Hauck, Mary Beth Markey, Sandra Mason, and Ursula 
McManus, and any Member, officer, or other employee of the Senate who 
is subpoenaed to testify, in connection with the testimony authorized 
under section 1.

                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4573

_____________________________

KENNETH S. FOUTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Wesley R. Douglas, Judge.

May 2, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2015-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137378 Michael F. Cavanagh 

& (25) Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly (30) Maura D. Corrigan (31) Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

DAVID McMILLIAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137378 

 COA: 286371 
 Wayne CC: 03-325112-CZ

DTE ENERGY,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED. 

l1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
III

Calendar No. 687

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 223

To refer S. 2188 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation

in Canada for the proportionate share of tribal funds and annuities

under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United States,

and for other purposes’’, to the Chief Judge of the United States Court

of Federal Claims for a report on the bill.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 1994

Mr. INOUYE (for himself and Mr. SIMON) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, without amendment

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 2188 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of the

Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the proportionate

share of tribal funds and annuities under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United States,

and for other purposes’’, to the Chief Judge of the

United States Court of Federal Claims for a report on

the bill.

1 Resolved, That S. 2188 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief

2 of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the propor-
2

•SRES 223 RS

1 tionate share of tribal funds and annuities under treaties

2 between the Pottawatomi Nation and the United States,

3 and for other purposes’’, now pending in the Senate, to4 gether with all accompanying papers, is referred to the

5 Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

6 The Chief Judge shall proceed according to the provisions

7 of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code,

8 and report back to the Senate, at the earliest practicable

9 date, providing such findings of fact and conclusions that

10 are sufficient to inform the Congress of—

11 (1) whether the claims against the United

12 States of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada that

13 would have been compensable under the Indian

14 Claims Commission Act (25 U.S.C. 70 et seq.) but

15 for the residence of the Pottawatomi Nation in Can16 ada and outside of the territorial limits of the

17 United States are legal or equitable in nature;

18 (2) the amount of damages (if any) that the

19 Pottawatomi Nation in Canada would have been en20 titled to receive under such Act but for the residence

21 of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada and outside of

22 the territorial limits of the United States that is

23 payable to the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada in ac24 cordance with section 1(1) of S. 2188; and
3

•SRES 223 RS

1 (3) the amount of interest that is payable on

2 the amount referred to in paragraph (2) in accord3 ance with section 1(2) of S. 2188, calculated at a

4 rate of 5 percent per year.
Calendar No. 687

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 223

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 2188 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of

Federal Claims for a report on the bill.to the Chief Judge of the United States Court ofand the United States, and for other purposes’’,under treaties between the Pottawatomi Nationportionate share of tribal funds and annuitiesthe Pottawatomi Nation in Canada for the proSEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported without amendment
# C_2014409EN.01005001.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/50

---

Action brought on 20 August 2014 — Beul v Parliament and Council

(Case T-640/14)

2014/C 409/71

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carsten René Beul (Neuwied, Germany) (represented by: H. Pott and T. Eckhold, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union and European Parliament

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies, in essence, on the following pleas in law.

In the first place, the applicant alleges that Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 (1) is not covered by any enabling provision.

1

In addition, the applicant takes the view that the provisions of Regulation No 537/2014 represent an unlawful infringement of the freedom to choose an occupation guaranteed in accordance with Article 6(1) TEU in conjunction with Article 15 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The applicant submits that the infringement of the freedom to choose an occupation is unjustified particularly on grounds of a lack of proportionality. Furthermore, the applicant claims infringement of the principle of subsidiarity.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC (OJ 2014 L 158, p. 77).

1

---
§ 1.356-2 Receipt of additional consideration not in connection with an exchange. ( a ) If, in a transaction to which section 355 would apply except for the fact that a shareholder (individual or corporate) receives property permitted by section 355 to be received without the recognition of gain, together with other property or money, without the surrender of any stock or securities of the distributing corporation, then the sum of the money and the fair market value of the other property as of the date of the distribution shall be treated as a distribution of property to which the rules of section 301 (other than section 301(b) and section 301(d)) apply. See section 358 for determination of basis of such other property.
( b ) Paragraph (a) of this section may be illustrated by the following examples:
Example 1. Individuals A and B each own 50 of the 100 outstanding shares of common stock of Corporation X. Corporation X owns all of the stock of Corporation Y, 100 shares. Corporation X distributes to each shareholder 50 shares of the stock of Corporation Y plus $100 cash without requiring the surrender of any shares of its own stock. The $100 cash received by each is treated as a distribution of property to which the rules of section 301 apply.
Example 2. If, in the above example, Corporation X distributes 50 shares of stock of Corporation Y to A and 30 shares of such stock plus $100 cash to B without requiring the surrender of any of its own stock, the amount of cash received by B is treated as a distribution of property to which the rules of section 301 apply.
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.2750 Pipetting and diluting system for clinical use. ( a ) *Identification.* A pipetting and diluting system for clinical use is a device intended to provide an accurately measured volume of liquid at a specified temperature for use in certain test procedures. This generic type of device system includes serial, manual, automated, and semi-automated dilutors, pipettors, dispensers, and pipetting stations.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2309, Jan. 14, 2000]
Jeff Kyle, Clerk Third Court of Appeals P. 0. Box 12547 Austin, TX 78711-2547 M. ANGELA FREEMAN Official Court Reporter Bastrop County Court at Law 804 Pecan Street Bastrop, TX 78602 512.581.4040 Phone 512.332.7291 fax freeman.maryange1a@gmai1 .com August 19, 2015

Re: Case No. 03-15-00391-CV VRM Vs. Edward Heard, et al Bastrop County, Texas
Dear Mr. Kyle, This case is currently on appeal, and is due 8/24/15. Today I spoke with Appellants' counsel's office, The Minerve Law Firm regarding payment for the Reporter's Record. The law firm is needing to get in touch with the Appellants regarding the fee for this, therefore, I am requesting30 days inorderto secureadepositand producetherecord. I would respectfully request that I be given an extension of 30 days, or until September 21, 2015. Please let me know if there is anything else you need. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely,

M. Angela Freeman
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1730 Photofluorographic x-ray system. ( a ) *Identification.* A photofluorographic x-ray system is a device that includes a fluoroscopic x-ray unit and a camera intended to be used to produce, then photograph, a fluoroscopic image of the body. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). A discography kit intended for use with a photofluorographic x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 84 FR 71819, Dec. 30, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8122 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8122

  To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock 
                          Creek National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2024

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock 
                          Creek National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rock Creek National Park Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF ROCK CREEK PARK AS ROCK CREEK NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Redesignation.--In recognition of its nationally significant 
natural, cultural, and historical resources, and important recreational 
opportunities, Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia, established 
by the Act of September 27, 1890 (26 Stat. 492), is redesignated as 
``Rock Creek National Park''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Title 40, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in section 8104(b), by striking ``Rock Creek Park'' and 
        inserting ``Rock Creek National Park''; and
            (2) in section 8501(a)(3)(B), by striking ``Rock Creek 
        Park'' and inserting ``Rock Creek National Park''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to Rock Creek 
Park in the District of Columbia is deemed to be a reference to Rock 
Creek National Park.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,081
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,436
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       190,688
<OTHER-SE>                                    (208,043)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,918)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL