alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF
                        CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                     OF
                              fonix CORPORATION
 
     fonix corporation, a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, 

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:
 
     FIRST: That pursuant to the recommendation of the Board of Directors
of the Company, the following resolution amending the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company has been adopted by the vote of stockholders
of the Company holding a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote
thereon.  The resolutions setting forth the amendment are as follows:
 
     RESOLVED, that the Company's Certificate of Incorporation be amended
to authorize and provide for the issuance of a preferred stock of the
Company as more fully set forth herein.  

     FURTHER RESOLVED, the form of the Amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Company (the " Amendment") attached hereto as Exhibit A
is hereby adopted and approved.  Pursuant to the Amendment, Article "FOURTH"
of the Company's Certificate Of Incorporation will be amended to provide
that the authorized capital of the Company will consist of 100,000,000
shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share, and 20,000,000 shares
of Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share, and that the Board of
Directors of the Company shall have authority to create by resolution of
the directors the powers, designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other rights, or the qualifications, limitations
or restrictions of any such series, to issue shares of one or more series
of Preferred Stock of the Company, and to designate the relative rights and
preferences of any such series.

     SECOND: That these resolutions have been adopted by written consent of
stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote
thereon in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.
 
     THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby affirms, under penalties of
perjury, that the foregoing instrument is the act and deed of the Company
and that the facts stated therein are true.  Dated this 24th day of
September, 1997.
 
                                   fonix corporation
 
                                   By: /s/ JEFFREY N. CLAYTON
                                      ---------------------------------    
                                        Jeffrey N. Clayton

                                   Title: Vice President and Secretary
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11174 Summary Calendar

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, LLC, ET AL., Defendants, LAWRENCE J. WARFIELD, Receiver, Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A., Counter Claimant, LONNIE GLENN SCHMIDT, Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:02-CV-605 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D July 21, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4.

1 In his notice ofappeal, Schmidt also appeals the district court’s ruling “to keep in full force and effect Temporary Order Placing Assets of Lonnie Schmidt and Daniel Schmidt in Receivership,” a substantive challenge to the court’s decision. Because Schmidt is not a party to the lawsuit, he can appeal such substantive determinations only under “a rare exception to the general rule,” Castillo v. Cameron County, 238 F.3d 339, 349 (5th Cir. 2001), that “only parties toa lawsuit, or those that properly become parties, may appeal an adversejudgment,” with “the better practice [being] for such a nonparty to seek intervention for purposes of appeal,” Marinov. Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301, 304 (1988). Because “the equities weigh [against] hearing the appeal,” Castillo, 238 F.3d at 349 (internal citations and quotations omitted), given Schmidt’s egregious conduct during the course ofthissuit, we do not consider this aspect ofhis non-party appeal. 

### 2 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### In an action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission involving an alleged “Ponzi scheme,” thedistrict court appointed a temporary receiver, Lawrence Warfield. He served Lonnie Schmidt, a non-party, with a copy of the Receivership Order, which directed that all persons holding certain assets provide them tothe receiver, but Schmidt did not adequately comply. On Warfield’s petition, the court ordered Schmidt individually to turn over the assets, but he did not, nor did he appear at the show-cause hearing. The court then held him in contempt; after several years, he was finally located and taken into custody. After an extensive period ofincarceration, Schmidt agreed tocomply with the court’s orders and was given leave to produce relevant documents. In early January 2008, Warfield recommended that Schmidt’s contempt be purged, and on June 5thedistrict court so ruled. Because contempt has been purged, the appeal is dismissed as moot. See Port v. Heard, 764 F.2d 423, 426-27 (5th Cir. 1985). 1 

### Schmidt’s “Motion for Order To Show Cause Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed” is DENIED. The Appeal is DISMISSED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON TROY BINGAMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 290 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 810 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to repeal the authority 

of the President to assume emergency control of the police of the District 

of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to repeal 

the authority of the President to assume emergency control of the police of the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Police Home Rule Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 810 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORITY OF PRESIDENT TO ASSUME 

2 EMERGENCY CONTROL OF POLICE OF DIS3 TRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

4 (a) REPEAL OF AUTHORITY.—The District of Colum5 bia Home Rule Act is amended by striking section 740 

6 (sec. 1–207.40, D.C. Official Code). 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

8 of such Act is amended by striking the item relating to 

9 section 740. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 1.37-2 Credit for individuals age 65 or over.

(a) *In general.* This section illustrates the computation of the credit for the elderly in the case of an individual who has attained the age of 65 before the close of the taxable year. This section shall not apply to an individual for any taxable year for which the individual makes the election described in section 37(e)(2) and paragraph (b) of § 1.37-3.

(b) *Computation of credit.* The credit for the elderly for an individual to whom this section applies equals 15 percent of the individual's “section 37 amount” for the taxable year. An individual's “section 37 amount” for a taxable year is the initial amount determined under section 37(b)(2), reduced as provided in section 37(b)(3) and (c)(1).

(c) *Examples.* The computation of the credit for the elderly for individuals to whom this section applies may be illustrated by the following examples:

# Example 1.

A, a single individual who is 67 years old, has adjusted gross income of $8,000 for the calendar year 1977. A also receives social security payments of $1,450 during 1977. A does not itemize deductions. A's credit for the elderly is $120, computed as follows:

| Initial amount under section 37(b)(2) | $2,500 |
| --- | --- |
| Reductions required by section 37 (b)(3) and (c)(1): | | |
| Social security payments | $1,450 | |
| One-half the excess of adjusted gross income over $7,500 | 250 | 1,700 |
| Section 37 amount | 800 |
| 15 pct. of $800 | $120 |

A's tax from the tax tables, which reflect the allowance of the general tax credit, is $662. Accordingly, the limitation of section 37(c)(2) and paragraph (b) of § 1.37-1 does not reduce A's credit for the elderly.

# Example 2.

H and W, who have both attained the age of 65, file a joint return for calendar year 1977. For that year H and W have adjusted gross income of $8,120; H also receives a railroad retirement pension of $1,550, and W receives social security payments of $1,200. H and W do not itemize deductions. The credit for the elderly allowed to H and W for 1977 is $139, computed as follows:

| Initial amount under section 37(b)(2) | $3,750 |
| --- | --- |
| Reductions required by section 37 (b)(3): | | |
| Railroad retirement pension | $1,550 | |
| Social Security payments | 1,200 | 2,750 |
| Section 37 amount | 1,000 |
| 15 pct. of $1,000 | 150 |
| Limitation based upon amount of tax (derived from table reflecting allowance of general tax credit) | $139 |

Since the adjusted gross income of H and W is not greater than $10,000, no reduction of the initial amount is required under section 37 (c)(1).

[T.D. 7743, 45 FR 84050, Dec. 22, 1980]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,148,050
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,180,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  6,949,469
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     88,803,589
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,857,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             104,682,242
<DEPOSITS>                                  96,159,037
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            789,213
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,549,808
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,184,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             104,682,242
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,552,840
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              284,637
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,837,477
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,308,236
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,308,236
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,529,241
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,728
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,439,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,061,019
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,061,019
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   546,514
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.3
<LOANS-NON>                                     16,257
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,328
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                407,155
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,565,923
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   55,687
<RECOVERIES>                                    47,666
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,857,902
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,840,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         17,902
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 47 (Thursday, March 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5250]



[[Page 11582]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 12064 and <greek-i> 12065]


West Virginia Disaster <greek-i> WV-00015

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for public assistance only for the state of West Virginia 
(FEMA-1881-DR), dated 03/02/2010.
    Incident: Severe winter storm and snowstorm.
    Incident Period: 12/18/2009 through 12/20/2009.
    Effective Date: 03/02/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/03/2010.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/02/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 03/02/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Boone, Calhoun, Clay, Fayette, Greenbrier, Kanawha, 
Mcdowell, Mingo, Nicholas, Pendleton, Pocahontas, Raleigh, Ritchie, 
Roane, Wyoming.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere.        3.625
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available                3.000
   Elsewhere...............................................
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available                3.000
   Elsewhere...............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12064B 
and for economic injury is 12065B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-5250 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ECO 2 Plastics, Inc. (f.k.a., Itec Environmental Group, Inc.), a Delaware corporation
      (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Rodney S. Rougelot,
      Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
      to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to their
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Rodney S.
                RougelotBy:
                    Rodney S. Rougelot
                  Its:
                    Interim Chief Financial Officer
  August
        14, 2007





[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ECO 2 Plastics, Inc. (f.k.a., Itec Environmental Group, Inc.) and will be retained
      by
      it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            7,474,725
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4,280,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                       8,933,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 21,562,684
<PP&E>                                           12,132,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,770,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,886,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,001,919
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            347,138
<OTHER-SE>                                        6,387,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     35,886,596
<SALES>                                           3,081,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,081,978
<CGS>                                             6,452,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6,452,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 21,516,253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,549,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (25,520,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (25,520,437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (25,520,437)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.76)
        


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00074-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 48th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 048-276347-15

Before Bassel, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

HARRIET NICHOLSON, Appellant

V.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal 

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).” We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: August 12, 2021
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7928 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to revise the rates of basic pay for 

certain enlisted members of the uniformed services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2024 

Mr. MIKE GARCIA of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to revise the rates of 

basic pay for certain enlisted members of the uniformed 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVISION TO THE RATES OF BASIC PAY FOR 

4 CERTAIN ENLISTED MEMBERS OF THE UNI5 FORMED SERVICES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

7 change the following cells in the military monthly basic 

8 pay table that was effective as of January 1, 2024, in ac9 cordance with the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7928 IH

1 (1) E–1 with greater than four months in serv2 ice to $2,600.60. 

3 (2) E–2 to $2,799.20. 

4 (3) E–3 with less than three years of service to 

5 $2,900.90. 

6 (4) E–3 with three years of service to 

7 $2,950.60. 

8 (5) E–3 with four years of service to $3,000.60. 

9 (6) E–3 with six or more years of service to 

10 $3,050.60. 

11 (7) E–4 with less than two years of service to 

12 $3,010.50. 

13 (8) E–4 with two years of service to $3,060.60. 

14 (9) E–4 with three years of service to 

15 $3,100.10. 

16 (10) E–4 with four years of service to 

17 $3,150.80. 

18 (11) E–4 with six years of service to $3,210.30. 

19 (12) E–4 with eight or more years of service to 

20 $3,260.30. 

21 (13) E–5 with less than two years of service to 

22 $3,100.30. 

23 (14) E–5 with two years of service to 

24 $3,150.20. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7928 IH

1 (15) E–5 with three years of service to 

2 $3,200.20. 

3 (16) E–5 with four years of service to 

4 $3,250.20. 

5 (17) E–6 with less than two years of service to 

6 $3,210. 

7 (b) ADJUSTMENT.—The 5.2-percent increase in pay 

8 in the fiscal year 2024 budget request or any future raises 

9 for all grades included in any future budget request is in 

10 addition to the changes identified in subsection (a). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.5980 Manual cast application and removal instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* A manual cast application and removal instrument is a nonpowered hand-held device intended to be used in applying or removing a cast. This generic type of device includes the cast knife, cast spreader, plaster saw, plaster dispenser, and casting stand.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 888.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, regarding general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, regarding complaint files.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 52954, Dec. 29, 1988; 66 FR 38816, July 25, 2001]