alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7990 

To extend the authorization for a large-scale water recycling and reuse grant 

program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2024 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO (for herself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HUFFMAN, and Ms. LEE

of Nevada) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization for a large-scale water recycling 

and reuse grant program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Large-Scale Water Re5 cycling Reauthorization and Investment Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT 

7 AND JOBS ACT. 

8 The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public 

9 Law 117–58) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7990 IH

1 (1) in section 40901(4)(B), by striking 

2 ‘‘$450,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000,000,000’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) in section 40905— 

5 (A) in subsection (c)(2), by striking 

6 ‘‘$500,000,000’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘$1,000,000,000’’; and 

8 (B) in subsection (k), by striking ‘‘5 years 

9 after the date of enactment of this Act’’ and in10 serting ‘‘6 years after the date of enactment of 

11 the Large-Scale Water Recycling Reauthoriza12 tion and Investment Act of 2024’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 263

To express the sense of the Senate condemning the cruel and tortuous

practice of female genital mutilation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate condemning the cruel

and tortuous practice of female genital mutilation.

Whereas the Senate recognizes the importance of traditions

and ritual rites of passage in the cultures of all nations;

Whereas such traditions and rites should not impede or violate the human rights of any person;

Whereas the practice of female genital mutilation of girls and

young women under the age of 18 represents an act of

cruelty and a basic violation of a person’s human rights;

Whereas the aftereffects of female genital mutilation include

shock, infection, psychological scarring, hemorrhaging,

and death;
2

•SRES 263 ATS

Whereas the practice of female genital mutilation represents

a threat to the health of girls and young women who undergo the procedure; and

Whereas the Government of Egypt should be commended for

the recent arrest and detention of 2 men who performed

circumcision on a 10-year-old girl while she was bound

and arranged for the filming of the tortuous procedure

for the Cable News Network: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 practice of female genital mutilation of girls and young

3 women under the age of 18 by any nation or individual

4 is condemned, and that the Government of Egypt and that

5 all other governments that aggressively and appropriately

6 decry, prevent, and deter this practice through education

7 and other means be, and they hereby are, commended by

8 the United States Senate.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Neenah Enterprises, Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Neenah Enterprises, Inc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert E. Ostendorf, Jr.Robert E. Ostendorf, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.1

Annual Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Santander UK Group Holdings plc (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2015 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 4, 2016 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Nathan Bostock     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Nathan Bostock         
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 4, 2016 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Antonio Roman      
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Antonio Roman          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, I, Martin L. Vaughan, III, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(b) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-Q.



| |  |     |  |                                      |  |  |  |       |  |            
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ----- |  | -----------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Martin L. Vaughan, III           |  |  |  | Date: |  | May 1, 2008
| |  |     |  | Martin L. Vaughan, III               |  |  |  |       |  |            
| |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |       |  |
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 
<NAME> MICROTEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,304,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,945,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   224,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,011,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,067,000
<PP&E>                                      10,813,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,679,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,908,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,776,000
<BONDS>                                      3,213,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          686,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,704,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,908,000
<SALES>                                     19,736,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,736,000
<CGS>                                       14,972,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,972,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                16,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             460,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,036,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,038,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,038,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.4540 Orthopedic manual surgical instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* An orthopedic manual surgical instrument is a nonpowered hand-held device intended for medical purposes to manipulate tissue, or for use with other devices in orthopedic surgery. This generic type of device includes the cerclage applier, awl, bender, drill brace, broach, burr, corkscrew, countersink, pin crimper, wire cutter, prosthesis driver, extractor, file, fork, needle holder, impactor, bending or contouring instrument, compression instrument, passer, socket positioner, probe, femoral neck punch, socket pusher, reamer, rongeur, scissors, screwdriver, bone skid, staple driver, bone screw starter, surgical stripper, tamp, bone tap, trephine, wire twister, and wrench.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 888.9.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 63014, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38815, July 25, 2001]
Observer Log of sUAS flights

**DATE / TIME LOCATION**  **PILOT WX**  **CONDITIONS AUTOPILOT** 

**SOFTWARE CONFIG**  **VERSION RC** 

**CONTROL BAND**  **(Ghz) VIDEO** 

**BAND (Ghz)** 
5/30/2014 1430 Evergreen,

CO Sam Spade W 5-10 APM Plane 3.2.3 2.4 N/A**TELEMETRY**

**BAND (Ghz) AIRCRAFT**  **MOTOR PROPELLER**  **BATTERY TYPE**  **Batt Used**

**by OSD (mah)**  **Batt actual**

**Recharged (mah)** 

0.9 Ritewing Z3 SS 1300kv 10x8 fixed 4s x1 3300 3150**Flight Time**

**(minutes)**

15**NOTES**

SAMPLE: Sky was clear with no clouds. Mission aircraft followed waypoints precisely, accurate imagery was captured. Only a single flight was necessary capture the entire area.
Exhibit 10.32


ASSURED GUARANTY LTD.


DESCRIPTION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CASH
COMPENSATION


FOR 2007


Set
forth below are the 2007 annual salary of 
the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and each of the
three other  most highly compensated Executive
Officers.


	
  Dominic J. Frederico

  
	
  President and Chief Executive Officer, Assured
  Guaranty Ltd.

  
	
   

  	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  $750,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Robert B. Mills

  
	
  Chief Financial Officer,
  Assured Guaranty Ltd.

  
	
   

  	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  $520,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Michael J. Schozer 

  
	
  President, Assured Guaranty
  Corp

  
	
   

  	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  $400,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  James M. Michener

  
	
  General Counsel, Assured
  Guaranty Ltd.

  
	
   

  	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  $390,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Robert A. Bailenson

  
	
  Chief Accounting Officer,
  Assured Guaranty Ltd.

  
	
   

  	
  Salary

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  $330,000

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


In addition to salary, the named executive officers
will be eligible to be considered to receive cash bonuses for 2007
performance.  In 2007, the named
executive officers will receive in 2007 perquisites and other annual
compensation including, employer contributions to retirement plans, tax
preparation and financial planning, club fees, business related spousal travel,
and executive health benefits.  In 2007,
Mr. Frederico and Mr. Michener will receive Bermuda housing allowances,
Bermuda  housing tax gross ups, FICA paid
by employer, Bermuda car allowances Bermuda family travel.
§ 884.5400 Menstrual cup. ( a ) *Identification.* A menstrual cup is a receptacle placed in the vagina to collect menstrual flow.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
[45 FR 12684, Feb. 26, 1980, as amended at 84 FR 71816, Dec. 30, 2019]
IA

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 85

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1993

Referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning May 2, 1993, as ‘‘National

Mental Health Counselors Week’’.

Whereas mental health counselors provide services along a

full continuum of care, including developmental and preventive services;

Whereas mental health counselors utilize individual and

group counseling techniques oriented toward assisting individuals with methods of problem solving, personal and

social development decision making, and the complex

process of developing self-understanding and making life

decisions;

Whereas mental health counselors work in conjunction with

other helping professionals, such a psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers, to determine the most appropriate counseling for each client;

Whereas mental health counselors work in psychiatric hospitals, community mental health agencies, private clinics,
2

SJ 85 RFH

college campuses, rehabilitation centers, and private practice;

Whereas mental health counselors are individuals upon

whom, by virtue of their education and extensive training,

heave been conferred masters or doctor of philosophy degrees in mental health counseling or community mental

health counseling, or similar degree titles having a focus

on mental health; and

Whereas mental health counselors, after having earned such

degrees, have performed at least 2 years of supervised

clinical counseling, and are licensed or certified in the

State of their residence, or are certified by the Academy

of Clinical Mental Health Counselors: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning May 2, 1993, is designated ‘‘Na4 tional Mental Health Counselors Week’’. The President is

5 requested to issue a proclamation calling upon all Govern6 ment agencies and the people of the United States to ob7 serve the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the Senate April 27 (legislative day, April

19), 1993.

Attest: WALTER J. STEWART,

Secretary.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 145 (Thursday, July 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date:  11 a.m., Friday, August 28, 2009.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status:  Closed.

Matters To Be Considered:  Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-18346 Filed 7-28-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3360 Hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metallic cemented or uncemented prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A hip joint femoral (hemi-hip) metallic cemented or uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a portion of the hip joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum. This generic type of device includes designs which are intended to be fixed to the bone with bone cement (§ 888.3027) as well as designs which have large window-like holes in the stem of the device and which are intended for use without bone cement. However, in these latter designs, fixation of the device is not achieved by means of bone ingrowth.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

L&F DISTRIBUTORS

, LLC

,

Appellant

,

V.

FERNANDO CARRASCO, JR.

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 07 6

- CV

Appeal from the

327 th District Court

o f El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2017

- DCV

- 3768 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal because the trial court has

entered an order which renders the appeal moot

. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a)( 1 ). We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal as moot

. Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant.

T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d).

July 5, 2019

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-11162

_____________________

JACKIE LADAPO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF DALLAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-1791-G)

_______________________________________________________

August 31, 1998

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The summary judgment in favor of the City of Dallas is

reversed because the affidavit and deposition of the plaintiff

raise an issue of sexual harassment by a co-worker so severe and

pervasive as to create an abusive working environment and alter

the conditions of her employment, and also raise an issue that

the supervisor and higher management of the City were informed of

the harassment but failed to take remedial action. See Faragher

v. City of Boca Raton, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 2283-84(1998); Jones v.
2

Flagship International, 793 F.2d 714, 719-20 (5th Cir. 1986),

cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1065 (1987). Plaintiffs proof is that her

co-worker made consistent remarks about the inferior place of

women, referred to his and her body parts, tried to get her to go

with him and spend the night when he could make her feel good —

all despite her insistence that he stop that offensive conduct. 

And her proof is that her verbal and written protests to her

supervisors achieved no protection for her from this abuse. When

the employment difficulties finally reached the stage of the

conference in the office of the manager of the administrative

support services of the city department in November, plaintiff

testifies that the city supervisors refused to allow her to

discuss Oglesby’s sexual harassment even though plaintiff tried

to do so several times.

Furthermore, assuming the truth (as we must) of her

statements of fact, and the falsity of the contradictions by her

supervisors and those responsible for the decision not to give

her the permanent employee position, an issue of pretext and

retaliation is raised.

These issues must be resolved by further proceedings.

JUDGMENT REVERSED; CAUSE REMANDED.
#### § 1.533-2 Statement required.

The corporation may be required to furnish a statement of its accumulated earnings and profits, the payment of dividends, the name and address of, and number of shares held by, each of its shareholders, the amounts that would be payable to each of the shareholders if the income of the corporation were distributed and other information required under section 6042.