alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 876.4340 High intensity ultrasound system for prostate tissue ablation. ( a ) *Identification.* A high intensity ultrasound system for prostate tissue ablation is a prescription device that transmits high intensity therapeutic ultrasound energy into the prostate to thermally ablate a defined, targeted volume of tissue, performed under imaging guidance. This classification does not include devices that are intended for the treatment of any specific prostate disease and does not include devices that are intended to ablate non-prostatic tissues/organs.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Non-clinical performance data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Characterization of acoustic pressure and power output at clinically relevant levels;
( ii ) Measurement of targeting accuracy and reproducibility of high intensity ultrasound output;
( iii ) Ultrasound-induced heating verification testing at target and non-target tissues;
( iv ) Electrical safety testing; and
( v ) Electromagnetic compatibility testing.
( 2 ) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
( 3 ) The elements of the device that may contact the patient's mucosal tissue must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 4 ) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the device components that contact the patient's mucosal tissue.
( 5 ) Performance data must support shelf life by demonstrating continued sterility of the device or the sterile components, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
( 6 ) Performance data must support the instructions for reprocessing all reusable components.
( 7 ) *In vivo* testing must demonstrate that the device thermally ablates targeted tissue in a controlled manner without thermal injury to adjacent, non-target tissues.
( 8 ) Clinical testing must document the adverse event profile, provide evidence of prostatic ablation, and demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use.
( 9 ) Training must be provided so that upon completion of the training program, the physician can: ( i ) Use all safety features of the device;
( ii ) Accurately target the high intensity ultrasound energy within the desired region of the prostate; and
( iii ) Perform the ablation procedure in a manner that minimizes damage to non-target tissues.
( 10 ) Labeling must include: ( i ) A section that summarizes the clinical testing results, including the adverse event profile and evidence of prostate ablation achieved; and
( ii ) An expiration date or shelf life for single use components.
[82 FR 45727, Oct. 2, 2017]
§ 1.457-9 Effect on eligible plans when not administered in accordance with eligibility requirements. ( a ) *Eligible governmental plans.* A plan of a State ceases to be an eligible governmental plan on the first day of the first plan year beginning more than 180 days after the date on which the Commissioner notifies the State in writing that the plan is being administered in a manner that is inconsistent with one or more of the requirements of §§ 1.457-3 through 1.457-8 or 1.447-10. However, the plan may correct the plan inconsistencies specified in the written notification before the first day of that plan year and continue to maintain plan eligibility. If a plan ceases to be an eligible governmental plan, amounts subsequently deferred by participants will be includible in income when deferred, or, if later, when the amounts deferred cease to be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, as provided at § 1.457-11. Amounts deferred before the date on which the plan ceases to be an eligible governmental plan, and any earnings thereon, will be treated as if the plan continues to be an eligible governmental plan and will not be includible in participant's or beneficiary's gross income until paid to the participant or beneficiary.
( b ) *Eligible plans of tax-exempt entities.* A plan of a tax-exempt entity ceases to be an eligible plan on the first day that the plan fails to satisfy one or more of the requirements of §§ 1.457-3 through 1.457-8, or § 1.457-10. *See* § 1.457-11 for rules regarding the treatment of an ineligible plan.
[T.D. 9075, 68 FR 41240, July 11, 2003; 68 FR 51447, Aug. 27, 2003]
## ... SERVED: MAY 24, 2013

IN THE MATTEROF RADIO HOLLAND USA, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0286
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011EA700202) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communicationsregarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List
. Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law JSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Jeanine Gotimer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel EasternRegion Federal Aviation Administration 1AviationPlaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3272 FAX: 718-995-5699 ONE COPY



### Anacarolina Estaba, Respondent's Counsel 

### Gardere Wynne Sewell, LLP 1000 Louisiana, Suite 3400 Houston, TX 77002-5011 TEL: 713-276-5398 FAX: 713-276-6398 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avep.ue, S.E. (Ell-310)' Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0286 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal· Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000854941
<NAME>                        ELEGANT ILLUSIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,126,525
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  424,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,865,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,829,501
<PP&E>                                         3,549,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,653,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,829,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          86,693
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,146
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,583,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,829,166
<SALES>                                        7,428,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,428,980
<CGS>                                          2,310,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,301,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,051,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                67,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                   25,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            42,496
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   42,496
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01




</TABLE>
§ 1.1091-2 Basis of stock or securities acquired in “wash sales”. ( a ) *In general.* The application of section 1091(d) may be illustrated by the following examples: Example 1. A purchased a share of common stock of the X Corporation for $100 in 1935, which he sold January 15, 1955, for $80. On February 1, 1955, he purchased a share of common stock of the same corporation for $90. No loss from the sale is recognized under section 1091. The basis of the new share is $110; that is, the basis of the old share ($100) increased by $10, the excess of the price at which the new share was acquired ($90) over the price at which the old share was sold ($80).
Example 2. A purchased a share of common stock of the Y Corporation for $100 in 1935, which he sold January 15, 1955, for $80. On February 1, 1955, he purchased a share of common stock of the same corporation for $70. No loss from the sale is recognized under section 1091. The basis of the new share is $90; that is, the basis of the old share ($100) decreased by $10, the excess of the price at which the old share was sold ($80) over the price at which the new share was acquired ($70).
( b ) *Special rule.* For a special rule as to the adjustment to basis required under section 1091(d) in the case of wash sales involving certain regulated investment company stock for which there is an average basis, see paragraph (e)(3)(iii) ( c ) and ( d ) of § 1.1012-1.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11910, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7129, 36 FR 12738, July 7, 1971]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0028 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TIMOTHY JOHN STRYKER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 1 2021

12/01/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0028
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 154

To welcome the holding of democratic elections in Pakistan, to congratulate

Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the occasion of her swearing-in, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. PELL (for himself, Mr. HELMS, Mr. MOYNIHAN, and Mr. BROWN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

To welcome the holding of democratic elections in Pakistan,

to congratulate Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the

occasion of her swearing-in, and for other purposes.

Whereas the United States and Pakistan have maintained

close and cooperative relations over many years;

Whereas the United States has a strong interest in strengthening democracy and human rights in Pakistan;

Whereas Pakistan held elections for the National and Provincial Assemblies on October 6 and 9, 1993, respectively;

Whereas the elections were observed by independent domestic

monitors and by an international delegation organized by

the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI);
2

SRES 154 IS

Whereas the NDI delegation reported that ‘‘the balloting was

generally open, orderly and well-administered,’’ that

‘‘election officials generally carried out their tasks impartially and with diligence,’’ and that the announcement of

results ‘‘generally proceeded in accordance with the law;’’

Whereas the people of the United States enjoy an abiding

friendship with the people of Pakistan; and

Whereas the United States and Pakistan share a common interest in the promotion of stability in Pakistan and the

easing of tensions in the South Asia region: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) welcomes the holding of elections on Octo3 ber 6 and 9, 1993, in Pakistan as an important step

4 toward reaffirming Pakistan’s democratic course;

5 (2) congratulates Prime Minister Benazir

6 Bhutto on the occasion of her swearing-in on Octo7 ber 19, 1993;

8 (3) reaffirms the existing ties of friendship be9 tween the peoples of Pakistan and the United

10 States; and

11 (4) underscores the continuing interest of the

12 United States in working with the government of

13 Pakistan on issues of bilateral and regional concern.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsIchor Holdings, Ltd:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-215984) on Form S-8 of Ichor Holdings, Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our report dated March 28, 2017, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Ichor Holdings, Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 30, 2016 and December 25, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 30, 2016, which report appears in the December 30, 2016 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Portland, Oregon

March 28, 2017
EXHIBIT 32


                   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on form 10-QSB of Edd Helms Group, Inc.
and Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the quarter ended November 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Date: January 20, 2004            /s/  W. Edd Helms, Jr.
      ----------------            ----------------------
                                  W. Edd Helms, Jr., President, Chief
                                  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 156

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to future extensions of

the emergency unemployment compensation program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 27 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. NICKLES (for himself, Mr. MOYNIHAN, and Mr. PACKWOOD) submitted

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to future

extensions of the emergency unemployment compensation

program.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) based on current economic forecasts, the

3 Senate does not anticipate the need for the enact4 ment of a further extension of the emergency unem5 ployment compensation program, and

6 (2) at the earliest possible date, the Administra7 tion should propose, and the Congress should enact,

8 legislation to reform the current unemployment in9 surance system.

Æ
## 1998 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

2-2-1998 

# Unit ed S t a t es v

. H a ddy
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 96-5589

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1998

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1998 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U nit e d S t a t e s v

. H a ddy " (1998). 1998 D e cisio n s . P ape r 23. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_1998/23

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Nos. 96-5589 and 96-5622 USA vs. Haddy, et al

The following modifications have been made to t he Court's Opinion issued on January 21, 1998 in the above-en titled appeal and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: Page 4, footnote 5., line 2: please ad "a" before word "grand". Page 11, paragraph 2, line 2: delete the w ords "to design" and substitute the word "designed". Page 12, paragraph 1, line 6: delete comma after "prejudicial" Page 12, paragraph 2; line 4: delete comma after cite; substitute period for comma. Capitalize "s" in word "See".

Very truly y ours,
/s/ P. Douglas Si sk, Clerk Dated: February 2, 1998
§ 1.547-6 Suspension of statute of limitations and stay of collection. ( a ) *Statute of limitations.* If the corporation files a claim for a deduction for deficiency dividends under section 547(e) and paragraph (b)(2) of § 1.547-2, the running of the statute of limitations upon assessment, distraint, and collection in court in respect of the deficiency, and all interest, additional amounts, or assessable penalties, shall be suspended for a period of two years after the date of the determination under section 547(c) and paragraph (b)(1) of § 1.547-2.
( b ) *Stay of collection.* If a deficiency in personal holding company tax is established by a determination under section 547(c) and paragraph (b)(1) of § 1.547-2, collection by distraint or court proceeding (except in case of jeopardy), of the deficiency and all interest, additional amounts, and assessable penalties, shall be stayed for a period of 120 days after the date of such determination, and, to the extent any part of such deficiency remains after deduction for deficiency dividends, for an additional period until the date the claim is disallowed. After such claim is allowed or rejected, either in whole or in part, the amount of the deficiency which was not eliminated by the application of section 547, together with interest, additional amounts and assessable penalties, will be assessed and collected in the usual manner.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: IRS redesignated the following sections to appear below the undesignated center heading “Regulations Applicable to Certain Bonds Sold Prior to July 8, 1997” and preceding the undesignated center heading “Deductions for Personal Exemptions.” See 62 FR 25507 and 25513, May 9, 1997 for the specific sections involved in the redesignation.

§ 1.402(g)-2 Increased limit for catch-up contributions. ( a ) *General rule.* Under section 402(g)(1)(C), in determining the amount of elective deferrals that are includible in gross income under section 402(g) for a catch-up eligible participant (within the meaning of § 1.414(v)-1(g)), the otherwise applicable dollar limit under section 402(g)(1)(B) (as increased under section 402(g)(7), to the extent applicable) shall be further increased by the applicable dollar catch-up limit as set forth under § 1.414(v)-1(c)(2).
( b ) *Participants in multiple plans.* Paragraph (a) of this section applies without regard to whether the applicable employer plans (within the meaning of section 414(v)(6)) treat the elective deferrals as catch-up contributions. Thus, a catch-up eligible participant who makes elective deferrals under applicable employer plans of two or more employers that in total exceed the applicable dollar amount under section 402(g)(1) by an amount that does not exceed the applicable dollar catch-up limit under either plan may exclude the elective deferrals from gross income, even if neither applicable employer plan treats those elective deferrals as catch-up contributions.
( c ) *Effective date* — ( 1 ) *Statutory effective date.* Section 402(g)(1)(C) applies to contributions in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2002.
( 2 ) *Regulatory effective date.* Paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section apply to contributions in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2004.
[T.D. 9072, 68 FR 40515, July 8, 2003]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,896]


North River Boats, Roseburg, OR; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on May 6, 2009, in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of workers of North River Boats, Roseburg, Oregon.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18041 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, I, Martin L. Vaughan, III,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                             |  |  |  |       |  |                 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | ----------------
|    |  |                                                             |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Martin L. Vaughan,
III                                  |  |  |  | Date: |  | October 31, 2006
|    |  | Martin L. Vaughan, III Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |       |  |