alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 94

To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9, 1993, as

‘‘National Customer Service Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 18 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. DOLE (for himself, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. INOUYE, Mr.

MATHEWS, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. GLENN, Mr. NUNN, Mr.

THURMOND, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr.

FAIRCLOTH, Mr. BURNS, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. GREGG, Mr. LIEBERMAN,

Mr. PACKWOOD, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr.

LEVIN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. COATS, Mr. DODD, Mr. JOHNSTON, Ms.

MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. PRESSLER, Mr. SASSER, Mr. EXON, Mr. SHELBY,

Mr. SIMON, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. DURENBERGER,

Mr. GRAMM, Mr. KERRY, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr.

WELLSTONE, Mr. REID, Mr. HELMS, Mr. MACK, and Mr. COHEN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 10 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Committee discharged

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October

9, 1993, as ‘‘National Customer Service Week’’.

Whereas recognition of the value and importance of the customer raises the quality of customer service;

Whereas the high cost of attracting new customers today

heightens the need for companies to keep existing customers through effective customer service;
2

•SJ 94 CDS

Whereas recognition of the contributions made by customer

service to the profitability of a company increases the

professional status of customer service;

Whereas excellent customer service distinguishes successful

companies that understand the important influence a customer has on the success of a company; and

Whereas excellent customer service can contribute to the

growth and success of every company: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9,

4 1993, is designated as ‘‘National Customer Service

5 Week’’. The President is authorized and requested to issue

6 a proclamation calling on the people of the United States

7 to observe the week with the appropriate ceremonies and

8 activities.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8107 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8107

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove certain age 
     restrictions on Medicaid eligibility for working adults with 
                             disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2024

  Mr. Ciscomani (for himself and Ms. Perez) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove certain age 
     restrictions on Medicaid eligibility for working adults with 
                             disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Access to Medicaid Buy-in 
Programs Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING CERTAIN AGE RESTRICTIONS ON MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY FOR 
              WORKING ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES.

    (a) Section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XV) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XV)) is amended by striking ``, but less 
than 65,''.
    (b) Section 1905(v)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396d(v)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ``, but less than 65,''.
                                 <all>
```
April 3, 1980

427 A.2d 1207

#### Commonwealth v. B. Brown, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

Allan M. *602Tabas, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, WIEAND and VAN der VOORT, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation.

Order affirmed.
# C_2015354EN.01003202.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — EE v OHIM (Representation of white dots on a yellow background)

(Case T-143/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark representing white dots on a yellow background - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 354/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: EE Ltd (Hatfield, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2013 (Case R 703/2013-2) relating to an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing white dots on a yellow background.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders EE Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EE Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 109 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 109

To constitute the minority party's membership on certain committees for 
 the One Hundred Third Congress, or until their successors are chosen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 19 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To constitute the minority party's membership on certain committees for 
 the One Hundred Third Congress, or until their successors are chosen.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the minority party's 
membership on the following committee for the remainder of the One 
Hundred Third Congress, or until their successors are chosen:
    Select Committee on Ethics: Mr. McConnell, Mr. Smith, and Mr. 
Craig.

                                 <all>
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > January 1957 Economic Report of the President

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency. Subcommittee on International Finance					 and 	Eighty-Fifth Congress, 1957-1959. 						*January 1957 Economic Report of the President : Hearings Before the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, Eighty-fifth Congress, First Session, Pursuant to Sec. 5 (a) of Public Law 304 (79th Congress), January 28, 29, 30, 31, February 1, 4, 5, and 6, 1957*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										January 28, 29, 30, 31, February 1, 4, 5, and 6, 1957,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1212,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# C_2014253EN.01005401.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/54

---

Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Embutidos Rodríguez v Commission

(Case T-415/14)

2014/C 253/71

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Embutidos Rodríguez, SL (Soto de la Vega, León, Spain) (represented by: A. López Gómez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera SA v Commission.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary M. De Laurentiis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gary M. De Laurentiis
--------------------------
Gary M. De Laurentiis
Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2003
III

Calendar No. 686

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 136

To refer S. 1325 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Horace Martin’’, to the

Chief Judge of the United States Claims Court for a report thereon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. THURMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, with an amendment and an amendment to the title

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in Italic.]

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 1325 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Horace

Martin’’, to the Chief Judge of the United States Claims

Court for a report thereon.

1 Resolved, That the bill (S. 1325) entitled ‘‘A bill for

2 the relief of Horace Martin’’, now pending in the Senate,

3 together with all accompanying papers, is referred to the

4 Chief Judge of the United States Claims Court. The Chief

5 Judge shall proceed with the same in accordance with the

6 provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United
2

SRES 136 RS

1 States Code, and report back to the Senate, at the earliest

2 practicable date, giving such finding of fact and conclu3 sions that are sufficient to inform Congress of the amount,

4 if any, legally or equitably due from the United States to

5 the claimant.

6 Resolved, That the bill (S. 1325) entitled ‘‘A bill for

7 the relief of Horace Martin’’, now pending in the Senate,

8 together with all accompanying papers, is referred to the

9 Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims.

10 The Chief Judge shall proceed with the same in accordance

11 with the provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28,

12 United States Code, and report back to the Senate, at the

13 earliest practicable date, giving such finding of fact and

14 conclusions that are sufficient to inform Congress of the

15 amount, if any, legally or equitably due from the United

16 States to the claimant.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘To refer S. 1325 entitled ‘A bill for the relief of Horace Martin’, to the Chief

Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for

a report thereon.’’.

Calendar No. 686

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 136

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 1325 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of

ed States Claims Court for a report thereon.Horace Martin’’, to the Chief Judge of the UnitSEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the

title
#### § 1.1367-0 Table of contents.

The following table of contents is provided to facilitate the use of §§ 1.1367-1 through 1.1367-3.

## § 1.1367-1 Adjustments to basis of shareholder's stock in an S corporation.

(a) In general.

(1) Adjustments under section 1367.

(2) Applicability of other Internal Revenue Code provisions.

(b) Increase in basis of stock.

(1) In general.

(2) Amount of increase in basis of individual shares.

(c) Decrease in basis of stock.

(1) In general.

(2) Noncapital, nondeductible expenses.

(3) Amount of decrease in basis of individual shares.

(d) Time at which adjustments to basis of stock are effective.

(1) In general.

(2) Adjustment for nontaxable item.

(3) Effect of election under section 1377(a)(2) or § 1.1368-1(g)(2).

(e) Ordering rules for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1997.

(f) Ordering rules for taxable years beginning on or after August 18, 1998.

(g) Elective ordering rule.

(h) Examples.

(i) [Reserved]

(j) Adjustments for items of income in respect of a decedent.

## § 1.1367-2 Adjustments to basis of indebtedness to shareholder.

(a) In general.

(b) Reduction in basis of indebtedness.

(1) General rule.

(2) Termination of shareholder's interest in corporation during taxable year.

(3) Multiple indebtedness.

(c) Restoration of basis.

(1) General rule.

(2) Multiple indebtedness.

(d) Time at which adjustments to basis of indebtedness are effective.

(1) In general.

(2) Effect of election under section 1377(a)(2) or § 1.1368-1(g)(2).

(e) Examples.

## § 1.1367-3 Effective date and transition rule.

[T.D. 8508, 59 FR 15, Jan. 3, 1994, as amended by T.D. 8852, 64 FR 71648, Dec. 22, 1999]
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 47 (Thursday, March 11, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5219]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

18 CFR Part 410

Schedule of Water Charges; Correction

AGENCY: Delaware River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the preamble to a proposed rule 
published in the Federal Register of February 19, 2010, amending the 
schedule of water charges. This correction clarifies that the amended 
rates are proposed to take effect in two stages, on January 1, 2011 and 
January 1, 2012, respectively, and not on January 1, 2010 and January 
1, 2011 as stated in the preamble.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Pamela M. Bush, 609-477-7203.
    Correction: In proposed rule FR Doc. 2010-3219, beginning on page 
7411 in the issue of February 19, 2010, make the following correction 
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. On page 7412 in the second 
column, in the second full paragraph, replace the text following the 
colon on the sixth line of the paragraph with the following:
    ``The consumptive use rate is proposed to be increased from $60 to 
$90 per million gallons effective on January 1, 2011 and from $90 to 
$120 per million gallons effective on January 1, 2012. The non-
consumptive use rate is proposed to be increased from $.60 to $.90 per 
million gallons effective on January 1, 2011 and from $.90 to $1.20 per 
million gallons effective on January 1, 2012.''

    Dated: March 5, 2010.
Pamela M. Bush,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-5219 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6360-01-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.2010 Medical image storage device. ( a ) *Identification:* A medical image storage device is a hardware device that provides electronic storage and retrieval functions for medical images. Examples include electronic hardware devices employing magnetic and optical discs, magnetic tapes, and digital memory.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 892.9.
[63 FR 23387, Apr. 29, 1998; 63 FR 44998, Aug. 24, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 2323, Jan. 14, 2000; 86 FR 20284, Apr. 19, 2021]
# C_2014235EN.01002901.xml

| 21.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/29

---

Action brought on 13 May 2014 — Helbrecht v OHIM — Lenci Calzature (SportEyes)

(Case T-333/14)

2014/C 235/39

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Andreas Helbrecht (Hilden, Germany) (represented by: C. König, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lenci Calzature SpA (Turchetto-Montecarlo, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 February 2014 in Case R 830/2013-5; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 February 2014 in Case R 830/2013-5;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Lenci Calzature SpA, if it should intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Lenci Calzature SpA, if it should intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SportEyes’ for goods in Class 25 — Community trade mark application No 7 5 04  525

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Lenci Calzature SpA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the figurative marks including the word elements ‘EYE SPORT EYE’, ‘EYE fashion EYE’ and ‘EYE’ for goods in Class 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8088 

To authorize reimbursement to applicants for uniformed military service for 

co-payments of medical appointments required as part of the Military 

Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) process. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2024 

Mr. FINSTAD (for himself and Ms. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize reimbursement to applicants for uniformed military service for co-payments of medical appointments 

required as part of the Military Entrance Processing 

Station (MEPS) process. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Applicant Medical Re5 imbursement Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8088 IH

1 SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENT OF APPLICANTS FOR UNIFORM 

2 MILITARY SERVICE FOR CO-PAYS OF MED3 ICAL APPOINTMENTS REQUIRED AS PART OF 

4 MEPS PROCESS. 

5 The Secretary of Defense is authorized to reimburse 

6 applicants for uniformed military service for up to $100 

7 per applicant for co-payment costs incurred by such appli8 cants for medical appointments required as part of the 

9 Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) process. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS