alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE
13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Dennis E. Bunday, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ DENNIS E. BUNDAY Dennis E. BundayChief Financial
OfficerWilliams Controls, Inc.February 7, 2005
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTUION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community National Bancorporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Theron G. Reed, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ava Lovett, Treasurer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/S/ Theron G. Reed
Theron G. Reed
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002

/S/ Ava Lovett
Ava Lovett
Treasurer
August 12, 2002
#### § 1.263(b)-1 Expenditures for advertising or promotion of good will.

See § 1.162-14 for the rules applicable to a corporation which has elected to capitalize expenditures for advertising or the promotion of good will under the provisions of section 733 or section 451 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, in computing its excess profits tax credit under Subchapter E, Chapter 2, or Subchapter D, Chapter 1, of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 47 (Thursday, March 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Crystal Lake Wind III, LLC, et al.; Notice of Effectiveness of 
Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

March 4, 2010.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Lake Wind III, LLC.............  EG10-6-000
GardenGarden Wind, LLC.................  EG10-7-000
Star Point Wind Project LLC............  EG10-8-000
Nacogdoches Power, LLC.................  EG10-9-000
FSE Blythe 1, LLC......................  EG10-10-000
Ridgewind Power Partners, LLC..........  EG10-11-000
Stetson Wind II, LLC...................  EG10-13-000
Buffalo Ridge II LLC...................  EG10-14-000
Elm Creek Wind II LLC..................  EG10-15-000
Cottonwood Energy Company LP...........  EG10-16-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the months of January and February, 2010, 
the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale 
Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's 
regulations 18 CFR 366.7(a).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-5205 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
§ 520.304 Carprofen. ( a ) *Specifications.* ( 1 ) Each caplet contains 25, 75, or 100 milligrams (mg) carprofen.
( 2 ) Each chewable tablet contains 25, 75, or 100 mg carprofen.
( 3 ) Each chewable tablet contains 25, 37.5, 50, 75, or 100 mg carprofen.
( 4 ) Each flavored tablet contains 25, 75, or 100 mg carprofen.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter for use as in paragraph (c) of this section. ( 1 ) Nos. 017033, 054771, 055529, and 062250 for use of products described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section as in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) Nos. 058198 and 086117 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(2) as in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 3 ) No. 069043 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section as in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 4 ) No. 086101 for use of product described in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(4) of this section as in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Conditions of use in dogs* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* 2 mg per pound (/lb) of body weight once daily or 1 mg/lb twice daily. For the control of postoperative pain, administer approximately 2 hours before the procedure.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the relief of pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis and for the control of postoperative pain associated with soft tissue and orthopedic surgeries.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Federal Law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[61 FR 66581, Dec. 18, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 32181, June 16, 1999; 66 FR 63165, Dec. 5, 2001; 67 FR 6866, Feb. 14, 2002; 67 FR 65038, Oct. 23, 2002; 67 FR 65697, Oct. 28, 2002; 70 FR 30626, May 27, 2005; 71 FR 51995, Sept. 1, 2006; 72 FR 68478, Dec. 5, 2007; 74 FR 21768, May 11, 2009; 78 FR 52853, Aug. 27, 2013; 78 FR 66264, Nov. 5, 2013; 79 FR 28819, May 20, 2014. Redesignated and amended at 80 FR 13229, Mar. 13, 2015; 80 FR 34278, June 16, 2015; 80 FR 61296, Oct. 13, 2015; 82 FR 43484, Sept. 18, 2017; 84 FR 12493, Apr. 2, 2019; 85 FR 4207, Jan. 24, 2020; 86 FR 13184, Mar. 8, 2021; 86 FR 14817, Mar. 19, 2021; 86 FR 61684, Nov. 8, 2021; 88 FR 27698, May 3, 2023; 89 FR 42357, May 15, 2024]
# C_2015081EN.01003002.xml

| 9.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/30

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 January 2015 — Speyart v European Commission

(Case F-30/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 081/39)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 10/6/14, p. 56.

1

---
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 114

Extending the provisions of Senate Resolution 106 of the One Hundred

First Congress (agreed to April 13, 1989).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 26 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Extending the provisions of Senate Resolution 106 of the

One Hundred First Congress (agreed to April 13, 1989).

1 Resolved, That (a) section 9 of Senate Resolution 106

2 of the One Hundred First Congress (agreed to April 13,

3 1989) (as amended by Senate Resolution 351 of the One

4 Hundred First Congress (agreed to October 27, 1990) and

5 as further amended by Senate Resolution 366 of the One

6 Hundred Second Congress (agreed to October 8, 1992))

7 is further amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 1993’’ and in8 serting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31, 1993’’.

9 (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be

10 deemed to have become effective as of March 30, 1993.
2

SRES 114 ATS

Æ
§ 1.1331-1 Recoveries in respect of war losses. ( a ) ( 1 ) The amount of any recovery in respect of *war loss property* must be included in gross income to the extent provided in section 1332 unless, pursuant to the taxpayer's election under section 1335, the provisions of section 1333 are applicable to such recovery. For the treatment of war loss recoveries under section 1333 and the manner of making the election under section 1335, see §§ 1.1333-1 and 1.1335-1.
( 2 ) As used in this part, the term *war loss property* means property considered under section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 as *destroyed or seized,* including any interest described in section 127(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.
( 3 ) For regulations governing the treatment of war losses under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, see 26 CFR (1939) 29.127(a)-1 to 29.127(a)-4, inclusive, 29.127(b)-1, and 29.127(e)-1 (Regulations 111) and 26 CFR (1939) 39.127(a)-1 (Regulations 118).
( b ) The recoveries in respect of any war loss property include the recovery of the same war loss property and the recovery of any money or property in lieu of such property or on account of the destruction or seizure of such property. For example, there is a recovery upon the return to the taxpayer after the termination of the war of his property which was treated as war loss property because it was located in a country at war with the United States. An award by a government on account of the seizure of the taxpayer's property by an enemy country is a recovery under this section. The amount obtained upon the sale or other transfer by the taxpayer of his right to any war loss property is also a recovery for the purpose of this section. Similarly, if a taxpayer who sustained a war loss upon the liquidation of a corporation has received the rights to any property of the corporation which was treated as war loss property, any recovery by the taxpayer with respect to such rights is a recovery by him for the purposes of this section.
( c ) For the purpose of this section, the recoveries considered are only those with respect to war losses sustained in prior taxable years. Similarly, the only deductions considered are those allowable for prior taxable years, and any allowable deductions for the year of the recovery are ignored for the purposes of applying such section to the recovery.
( d ) If a deduction was claimed under section 127(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 by a taxpayer in computing his tax for any taxable year and if such deduction was disallowed in whole or in part, any recovery in respect of the portion disallowed shall not be subject to the provisions of part IV (section 1331 and following), subchapter Q, chapter 1 of the Code.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12042, Nov. 26, 1960]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JORDAN AMERICAN HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,025,456
<SECURITIES>                                   814,363
<RECEIVABLES>                                  411,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                   115,561
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,184,031
<PP&E>                                         279,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,825,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          641,550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,678
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,142,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,825,109
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,750,359
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                408,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            408,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   408,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
April 7, 1953 

Dr. Geo. W. Cox. M.D. Gvinion No. S-24 

State Health C$icer - 

State Health Department Re: Applicability of the regisAustin, Texas tration requirements of the 

Texas Livestock Remedy Act 

to manufacturers who sell 

Dear Dr. Coxr only to veterinarians. 

Your question is substantially as follows: 

Does Section12 of Article 192-1, 

Vernon's Civil Statutes, exempt from registration under the Texas Livestock,Remedy 

Act manufacturers of live stock remedies 

who sell only to veterinarians and not for 

resale? 

Section 12 of Article 192-1, Vernon's Civil 

Statutes, is as follows: 

"Nothing in this Act shall be construed as being applicable to or interfering 

with the compounding and dispensing of veterinarians' prescriptions, nor the dispensing 

of drugs or preparations by registered pharmacists compo~unded at the request of the 

purchaser and not intended for the purpose 

of resale." 

We think that the meaning of the above quoted 

Section is clear that manufactured or compounded and 

packaged articles of merchandise are not contemplated 

or intended to be exempted, but only that veterinarianss 

prescriptions and drugs compounded by a registered pharmacist at the request of the purchaser, not for resale, 

are contemplated by the Section quoted. Therefore, you 

are advised that the registration requirements of the 

Texas Livestock Remedy Act are applicable to manufacturers 

who sell only to veterinarians. 
Dr. Geo. W. Cox, M.D,, page 2 (S-24) 

SUMMARY 

The registration requirements of the 

Texas Livestock Remedy Act are applicable 

to man~ufacturers who sell only to veterinarians. 

Yours very truly, 

APPROVED: 

J. C. Davis, Jr, 

County Affairs Division 

Willis E. Gresham 

Reviewer 

Robert S. Trotti 

First Assistant 

JOHN BEN SHEPPERD 

Attorney General 

By 4ike--* 

B. Duncan Davis 

Assistant 

John Ben Shepperd 

Attorney General 

BDDzam
EX-10.21.1 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCH PLAN



 





Exhibit 10.21.1



AMENDMENT TO


COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST

EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE PLAN



     This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Colonial Properties Trust Employee Share Purchase
Plan, as amended, is entered into as of October 25, 2006 by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of
Colonial Properties Trust (the “Company”).



     WHEREAS, the Colonial Properties Trust Employee Share Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) was approved
and adopted by the Board on April 24, 1997; and



     WHEREAS, the Board previously amended the Plan to eliminate the discount provided on the price
of shares purchased under the Plan.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 18 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby further amended
in the following respect:



     1. Section 11 (ISSUANCE OF SHARE CERTIFICATES; TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS) of the Plan is hereby
amended to delete the following phrase:




; provided further, that Shares purchased for a Participant’s account with payroll
deductions may not be sold, pledged, hypothecated, or otherwise transferred by such
Participant during the six months following the allocation of such Shares to the
Participant’s account, other than by will, in accordance with the laws of descent and
distribution, or pursuant to a domestic relations order, and therefore no share certificate
representing any such Shares will be issued to a Participant during such six-month period



     2. All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them
in the Plan.



     3. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan remains in full force and effect.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by the undersigned, a
duly authorized officer of the Company, as of the date first set forth above and made effective as
of January 26, 2004.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COLONIAL PROPERTIES TRUST

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John P. Rigrish 	 
	 	Name:  	John P. Rigrish 	 
	 	Title:  	Chief Administrative Officer 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
 	 
	 	By:  	Colonial Properties Trust, as general partner
 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John P. Rigrish 	 
	 	Name:  	John P. Rigrish 	 
	 	Title:  	Chief Administrative Officer
-                              Who We Are    -  **Our Agency**-  Mission, Vision, and Values
-  Awards and Certifications
-  Leadership
-  Organizational Chart 
-  History
-  Team Locations
- Congressional Relations
-  Publication Distribution Update Form
-  Official Federal Register Subscription Form
- Inspector General
**News and Media**-  News and Press Releases
-  Media Kit
-  GPO Style Manual
-  Videos
-  Coronavirus Resources
-  January 6th Select Committee Report PII Incident
**Careers**-  Open Positions
-  How to Apply
-  Benefits
- GPO Employee Resources    
-                              Work With Us    -  **Agencies**-  Congressionally Mandated Reports
-  New Customers
-  Contact Your Team
-  Services for Agencies
-  GPO Publish - Place and Manage Orders Online
-  Forms and Standards
-  Billing and Payment
-  G-Invoicing
-  Circular Letters
-  Events and Training
- Updates and Notices
- Federal Publishing Council
**Vendors**-  How to Register
-  Programs for Vendors
-  Forms and Standards
-  How to Get Paid
-  Contract Opportunities
-  Term Contract Pricing
-  One Time Bid Pricing
-  Updates and Notices    
-                              Explore and Research    -  **Search, Review, and Access**-  Catalog of U.S. Government Publications
-  GovInfo
-  U.S. Government Bookstore
-  Free Government Publications – Pueblo
-  Electronic Code of Federal Regulations
-  Government Book Talk Blog
-  Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Case Inventory
**Students, Parents, and Educators**-  Locate a Federal Depository Library
-  Ben's Guide to the U.S. Government
-  Order Federal Publications in Print
-  Civics Renewal Network
**Visit Our Partners**-  congress.gov
-  federalregister.gov
-  loc.gov
-  archives.gov
-  ofr.gov
-  house.gov
-  senate.gov
-  uscourts.gov    
-  Congressionally Mandated Reports 
-  Contact Us 

-  Search**    - gpo.gov
  - govinfo 

Security Credentials
Warehousing and Distribution

## Procurement Vehicles and Services

GPO Publish - Place and Manage Orders OnlineGPO*Express*GPO Online Paper StoreNationwide Procurement Programs Onsite Document SolutionsSimplified Purchase Agreement Program (SPA)

## Support Services

Billing and PaymentFederal Depository Library Program National Account ManagersOffice of the Federal Register Publishing ServicesGuides and InstructionsProcurement Services TeamsTraining Opportunities 

----

-  Facebook** 
-  Twitter** 
-  Instagram** 
-  You Tube** 
-  Pinterest** 
-  Linkedin** 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

Accessibility | Privacy | COOP  | Inspector General
Note to Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0837

On March 10, 2011, a “Response to Comments on PGVP/AETB Proposed Rule” document was placed in Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0837. On March 2 2 , 2011, a revised “Response to Comments on PGVP/AETB Proposed Rule” document replac ed the first “Response to Comments on PGVP/AETB Proposed Rule” document in the same docket. The only change in the new document was the removal of DRAFT from the title on page 1 and the removal of the file name on the upper right corner of the Table of Co ntents page.
Montana Associ at ion of Counties_,- __ _ 

2715 SKYWAY DRIVE, SUITE A, HELENA, MTS.9lio;r~? - '" 

April 5, 2013 

Docket Operations M-30 

West Building Ground Floor W 12-140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington DC 20590;3 

United States of America 

Department of Transportation 

Office of Secretary 

Washington DC 

RE. Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 

/4011\ 444-4%0 Frtx /4011\ 447-S:nR 

- ···• ~ ' l 

'·~. I _j 

The Montana Association of Counties strongly encourages the continuation of Essential Air 

Service to the Montana communities of Lewistown and Miles City. In both communities, air 

service may become the only commercial means of accessing larger airline hubs with the 

recent shut down of Rimrock Stages bus service. While some of the routes that Rimrock 

operated are slowing being replaced by other ground carriers, that future is uncertain at 

best. 

The continuation of service to these communities is an essential part of the complete statewide connectivity in Montana and losing any of the links may well foreshadow the loss of 

EAS statewide, which would be very damaging to our state's economy. 

Billings is a medical center where two large tertiary medical centers are located. These 

centers serve the advanced medical needs of central and eastern Montana. The air 

connectivity between Miles City and Lewistown may be a patient's best option to seek. 

medical services. 

MACo 
Montana is a state of vast distances when compared with most other states. Losing 

Essential Air Service in Lewistown and Miles City is not a matter of passengers being 

inconvenienced by an additional drive of 25- 50 miles. The distances between these 

communities and Billings are not all that different than from Washington DC to 

Philadelphia. 

The Montana Association of Counties requests that you not enforce the Show Cause Order 

contained in Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 and to allow the Montana Essential Air Task 

Force and affected communities at least two years to develop plans to increase ridership. 

Sincerely, 

L Harold Blattie, Executive Director
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 01-1760 UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v. OSVALDO RODRIGUEZ CARDONA, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Héctor M. Laffitte, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Torruella, Circuit Judge , Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge , and Lynch, Circuit Judge .
Osvaldo Rodriguez Cardona on brief pro se. Guillermo Gil , United States Attorney, Jorge E. VegaPach eco , Assistant United States Attorney, and NelsonPerezSosa , Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

November 15, 2001Per Curiam . We have reviewed the parties' briefs

and the record on appeal. We affirm the district court's denial of appellant's motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Section 3582(c)(2) pertains to a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by amendment to the guidelines. It is plainly inapplicable to appellant. Moreover, appellant may not raise again an issue already considered andrejected on his direct appeal. See United States v. Rodriguez-Cardona , 924 F.2d 1148, 1154-57 (1st Cir.), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 809 (1991).

Affirmed .
#### § 1.6042-5 Coordination with reporting rules for widely held fixed investment trusts under § 1.671-5.

See § 1.671-5 for the reporting rules for widely held fixed investment trusts (as defined under that section).

[T.D. 9241, 71 FR 4025, Jan. 24, 2006]