alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format) 

I. GENERAL INFORMATION 

District: Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District 

Rule No(s): 1.1 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: May 8, 2013 

Rule Title(s): General Provisions and Definitions 

Date Submitted to ARB: May 10, 2013 

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): May 14, 2008 

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No (If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Paul Hensleigh Phone Number: 530-757-3665 E-mail Address: phensleigh@ysaqmd.org 

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule 

This rule is being amended to add 8 additional exempt compounds. In addition, sections of the rule were moved 

for clarity and several definitions were added and/or amended. 

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 

 (CO) PM TAC (name): 

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS 

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference(s) for emission factor(s) 

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined. 

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A 

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: 

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: Area Affected: 

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible): 

 

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: 

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: 

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): 

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and 

planning. 

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS 

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split 

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 

Percent in Nonattainment Area: % 
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format) 

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: Percent in Nonattainment Area: % 

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as 

necessary): 

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY 

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No 

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule. 

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: 

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS 

The Rule Contains: 

Emission Limits in Section(s): Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN 

 No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment 

Discussion:
January 8, 2013.

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FRED SATCHEL, Appellant

NO. 14-12-01051-CV V.

HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order signed by the court below on October 10, 2012. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Fred Satchel.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, RobinRaina, certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ebix, Inc.;

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  | November 11, 2005  | /s/ Robin Raina |   |
|--------|-------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|   | Robin Raina             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
August 26, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Sandra M. BroderickName:

Sandra M. BroderickTitle:

EVP Head of OperationsDate:

March 29, 2019By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

TreasurerDate:

March 29, 2019
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 189

Congratulating Bowdoin College on the occasion of its bicentennial

anniversary.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 11 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. COHEN) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Bowdoin College on the occasion of its

bicentennial anniversary.

Whereas Bowdoin College was established in 1794 by the

General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as

the first college in the District of Maine;

Whereas, since 1802, Bowdoin College has educated students

from Maine, the rest of the Nation, and many foreign

countries on the principle that: ‘‘literary institutions are

founded and endowed for the common good and not for

the private advantage of those who resort to them for

education’’;

Whereas alumni of Bowdoin College have included 1 President of the United States, 16 Members of the Senate, 42

Members of the House of Representatives, 2 Supreme

Court Justices, and many other public officials;
2

•SRES 189 ATS

Whereas other distinguished alumni of Bowdoin College have

included authors Nathaniel Hawthorne and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Civil War hero and the Governor of

Maine Joshua Chamberlain, Arctic explorer Admiral Robert E. Peary, and Olympic gold medalist Joan Benoit

Samuelson; and

Whereas Bowdoin College is consistently named one of the

Nation’s most outstanding liberal arts colleges: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes the contributions made by

3 Bowdoin College to the State of Maine and the Na4 tion over the past 200 years;

5 (2) extends heartiest congratulations to the stu6 dents, alumni, faculty, staff, and administrators of

7 this great institution of higher learning on the occa8 sion of its bicentennial anniversary; and

9 (3) offers best wishes for the continued success

10 of Bowdoin College in the future.

Æ
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 17, 200 3 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. VERNICA SHABRE E WARD Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 99-D-2836 Cheryl Blackburn, Judge
No. M2002-01816-CCA-R3-CD - F iled December 30, 2003

J OHN E VERE TT W IL LI AMS , J., s eparat e concu rring.
Iagree with the majority

opinion that the so-called “rule of three” evidence should have been excluded in this case, based upon the trial court’s initial ruling that there was insufficient foundation laid to allow its admissibility. I write se parately to e

xpress that I limit my dec ision to the instant case. After careful review, I concluded that the admissibility of this e vidence was a ve ry close decision and defe rred, a s I must, to the trial court’s decision. However, with additional testimony concerning

the McDaniel factors, a proper foundation might be laid for admitting expert testimony concerning the “rule of thre e.”

___________________________________ JOHN EVERETT WILL

IAMS, JUDGE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135189 & (42) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135189 

 COA: 272142 

Monroe CC: 05-034907-FC 

BILLY JOE RICE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 13, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED. 

d0114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 22, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit
      32




CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Gary M.
      De
      Laurentiis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Frederick W. Smith,
      Jr.,
      Principal Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to
§ 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to their
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Gary M. De Laurentiis


By:
      Gary
      M. De Laurentiis


Its:
      Chief Executive Officer, Director





/s/
      Frederick W. Smith, Jr.


By:
      Frederick W. Smith, Jr.


Its:
      Principal Financial Officer/


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer





August
      11, 2006





[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Itec Environmental Group, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HealthChoice, Inc.  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed  with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I
 John C. Stuecheli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
 to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as adopted pursuant to S 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
 of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with  the requirements of Section  13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained  in the Report  fairly presents, in  all
 material respects, the financial condition and  result of operations of  the
 Company.



 /s/ John C. Stuecheli


 John C. Stuecheli

 Chief Financial Officer

 August 13, 2003
#### § 1.503(d)-1 Cross references.

For provisions relating to loans described in section 503(b)(1) by a trust described in section 401(a), see § 1.503(b)-1 and section 503 (e) and (f) and the regulations thereunder.

[T.D. 7428, 41 FR 34623, Aug. 16, 1976]
§ 1.601-1 Special deduction for bank affiliates. ( a ) The special deduction described in section 601 is allowed: ( 1 ) To a holding company affiliate of a bank, as defined in section 2 of the Banking Act of 1933 (12 U.S.C. 221a), which holding company affiliate holds, at the end of the taxable year, a general voting permit granted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
( 2 ) In the amount of the earnings or profits of such holding company affiliate which, in compliance with section 5144 of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 61), has been devoted by it during the taxable year to the acquisition of readily marketable assets other than bank stock.
( 3 ) Upon certification by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to the Commissioner that such an amount of the earnings or profits has been so devoted by such affiliate during the taxable year No deduction is allowable under section 601 for the amount of readily marketable assets in excess of what is required by section 5144 of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 61) to be acquired by such affiliate, or in excess of the taxable income for the taxable year computed without regard to the special deductions for corporations provided in part VIII (section 241 and following), subchapter B, chapter 1 of the Code. Nor may the aggregate of the deductions allowable under section 601 and the credits allowable under the corresponding provision of any prior income tax law for all taxable years exceed the amount required to be devoted under such section 5144 to the acquisition of readily marketable assets other than bank stock.
( b ) Every taxpayer claiming a deduction provided for in section 601 shall attach to its return a supplementary statement setting forth all the facts and information upon which the claim is predicated, including such facts and information as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe as necessary to enable it, upon the request of the Commissioner subsequent to the filing of the return, to certify to the Commissioner the amount of earnings or profits devoted to the acquisition of such readily marketable assets. A certified copy of such supplementary statement shall be forwarded by the taxpayer to the Board of Governors at the time of the filing of the return. The holding company affiliate shall also furnish the Board of Governors such further information as the Board shall require. For the requirements with respect to the amount of such readily marketable assets which must be acquired and maintained by a holding company affiliate to which a voting permit has been granted, see section 5144(b) and (c) of the Revised Statutes (12 U.S.C. 61).
§ 1.1502-24 Consolidated charitable contributions deduction. ( a ) *Determination of amount of consolidated charitable contributions deduction.* The deduction allowed by section 170 for the taxable year shall be the lesser of: ( 1 ) The aggregate deductions of the members of the group allowable under section 170 (determined without regard to section 170(b)(2)), plus the consolidated charitable contribution carryovers to such year, or
( 2 ) Five percent of the adjusted consolidated taxable income as determined under paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Carryover of excess charitable contributions.* The consolidated charitable contribution carryovers to any consolidated return year shall consist of any excess consolidated charitable contributions of the group, plus any excess charitable contributions of members of the group arising in separate return years of such members, which may be carried over to the taxable year under the principles of section 170(b) (2) and (3). However, such consolidated carryovers shall not include any excess charitable contributions apportioned to a corporation for a separate return year pursuant to paragraph (e) of § 1.1502-79.
( c ) *Adjusted consolidated taxable income.* For purposes of this section, the adjusted consolidated taxable income of the group for any consolidated return year shall be the consolidated taxable income computed without regard to this section, section 242, section 243(a) (2) and (3), § 1.1502-25, § 1.1502-26, and § 1.1502-27, and without regard to any consolidated net operating or net capital loss carrybacks to such year.
[T.D. 6894, 31 FR 11794, Sept. 8, 1966]
#### § 1.1402(a)-10 Personal exemption deduction.

The deduction provided by section 151, relating to personal exemptions, is excluded.
**
**Exhibit 34.3**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Managing Member 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

New York, NY 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in theaccompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2018 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (item 1122(d)) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, excluding those criteria determined by managementand noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backedsecurities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. Reference Exhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

We conducted our examination in accordance with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform theexamination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Company complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d). Our examination included tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform,determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Ourprocedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset backed transactionincluded in the Platform. Further an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the Company’s servicingactivities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the yearended December 31, 2018, for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material aspects. 

 

/s/ Katz, Sapper & Miller, LLP

New York, New York

February 20, 2019

 
1 

**