alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rialto CAPITAL(logo)  2016 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance
(Item 1123)   Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of August 1, 2015 by and among Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. as
Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC
as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Operating Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee relating to the Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSAIL
2015-C3 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C3 (CSAIL 2015-C3)  The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special
Servicer”), except for the Charles River Plaza North Whole Loan, herein certifies to the following:  1.All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.2.A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,
2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been
conducted under my supervision.3.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been
a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically
identified herein.   Certified by:
    /s/ Adam Singer
    Date: March 1, 2017Adam Singer, Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8057 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8057

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, as the ``Little Saigon 
              Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LITTLE SAIGON VIETNAM WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Little Saigon Vietnam War Veterans Memorial 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Little 
Saigon Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 8057

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, as the ``Little Saigon 
              Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
```
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Charley Changmin Yoon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2015-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



|Date: March 16, 2017 |     |                                                              
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                                              
|                     | By: | /s/ Charley Changmin Yoon                                    
|                     |     | Name: Charley Changmin Yoon                                  
|                     |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
|                     |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 102 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 205

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. RES. 102

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

To refer S. 840 entitled ``For the relief of the estate of Dr. Beatrice 
  Braude.'' to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 205
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 102

To refer S. 840 entitled ``For the relief of the estate of Dr. Beatrice 
  Braude.'' to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 28 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself and Mr. D'Amato) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                Reported by Mr. Biden, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To refer S. 840 entitled ``For the relief of the estate of Dr. Beatrice 
  Braude.'' to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved, That the bill S. 840 entitled ``For the relief of the 
estate of Dr. Beatrice Braude.'' now pending in the Senate, together 
with all the accompanying papers, is referred to the Chief Judge of the 
United States Court of Federal Claims. The Chief Judge shall proceed 
with the same in accordance with the provisions of sections 1492 and 
2509 of title 28, United States Code, and report thereon to the Senate, 
at the earliest practicable date, giving such findings of fact and 
conclusions thereon as shall be sufficient to inform the Congress of 
the nature and character of the demand as a claim, legal or equitable, 
against the United States or a gratuity and the amount, if any, legally 
or equitably due to the claimants from the United States.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Consolidated Balance Sheet as of 6/29/97 and the Consolidated  Statement of
     Operations for the 6 months ended 6/29/97.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                         5,803
<SECURITIES>                                   1,495
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,365 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11,888
<PP&E>                                        69,894 <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               112,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         21,572
<BONDS>                                       67,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       2,084
<OTHER-SE>                                    16,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 112,272
<SALES>                                       67,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              70,685
<CGS>                                         22,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 67,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  14
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,734
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (860)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (860)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.04)
<FN>
<F1> The asset values for receivables and PP&E represent net amounts.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 105

To amend Senate Resolution 75, agreed to March 3, 1993 (103d Congress).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 29 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. JEFFORDS (for Mr. DOLE) (for himself and Mr. MITCHELL) submitted

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To amend Senate Resolution 75, agreed to March 3, 1993

(103d Congress).

1 Resolved, That section 4 of Senate Resolution 75,

2 agreed to March 3, 1993 (103d Congress), is amended by

3 deleting ‘‘$250,000’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

4 ‘‘$300,000’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 4.1

                     [SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE OF COMMON STOCK]

     NUMBER                                                        SHARES
 [CERTIFICATE  #]                                           [NUMBER  OF  SHARES]

              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                    BHC, INC.

                    TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE 105,000,000 SHARES

     100,000,000 Shares                                      5,000,000 Shares
   Par Value $0.001 Each                                  Par Value $0.0001 Each
       Common  Stock                                         Preferred  Stock

                                                                 See Reverse for
                                                             Certain Definitions

                                   [SPECIMEN]

THIS  IS  TO  CERTIFY  THAT ___________________________       IS  THE  OWNER  OF


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF
                                    BHC, INC.

transferable  on  the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or
by  duly  authorized  Attorney  upon  surrender  of  this  Certificate  properly
endorsed.
WITNESS,  the  seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.

DATED
       -------------------

                                [CORPORATE SEAL]


-----------------------------                             ----------------------
                    SECRETARY                                          PRESIDENT





                                      E-18
<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-5073
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GEORGE B. SPENCE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CR-02-6) Submitted: January 3, 2006 Decided: January 19, 2006 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John S. Edwards, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: George B. Spence appeals the denial of his motion to compel specific performance of that portion of his plea agreement requiring the government to make a motion for a downward departure if Spence offered full, voluntary, and truthful testimony, if he abided by any reasonable requests of the case agents or the United States Attorney’s Office, and if his efforts resulted in the prosecution of another person. Having carefully considered the parties’ submissions, we affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for
        the
        period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock, Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 **/s/
                    THOMAS A. MURDOCK**Thomas
                    A. MurdockChief
                    Executive Officer
 Dated
        May
        12, 2006
# C_2014261EN.01005002.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/50

---

Action brought on 26 June 2014 — Industrias Espadafor and Others v Commission

(Case T-478/14)

2014/C 261/79

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Industrias Espadafor, SA (Granada, Spain); Tutichip, SAU (Barcelona, Spain); Locales, Actividades y Exclusivas Comerciales, SA (Vigo, Spain); RNB, SL (La Pobla de Vallbona, Spain); and Inversiones Antaviana, SA (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero, and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid;

| — | annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.

Bankia

Commission

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
2000 QUARTER YEAR END FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,349,315
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      312,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        224,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,927,079
<PP&E>                                             185,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,872,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,317,605
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,506,100
<COMMON>                                            30,596
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,872,002
<SALES>                                            267,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   267,417
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,474,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (82,400)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (6,661)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,118,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,128,134)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,056,962)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.07)


</TABLE>