alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 94

To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9, 1993, as

‘‘National Customer Service Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 18 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. DOLE (for himself and Mrs. KASSEBAUM) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October

9, 1993, as ‘‘National Customer Service Week’’.

Whereas recognition of the value and importance of the customer raises the quality of customer service;

Whereas the high cost of attracting new customers today

heightens the need for companies to keep existing customers through effective customer service;

Whereas recognition of the contributions made by customer

service to the profitability of a company increases the

professional status of customer service;

Whereas excellent customer service distinguishes successful

companies that understand the important influence a customer has on the success of a company; and
2

•SJ 94 IS

Whereas excellent customer service can contribute to the

growth and success of every company: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9,

4 1993, is designated as ‘‘National Customer Service

5 Week’’. The President is authorized and requested to issue

6 a proclamation calling on the people of the United States

7 to observe the week with the appropriate ceremonies and

8 activities.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3630 Resorbable shoulder spacer. ( a ) *Identification.* A resorbable shoulder spacer is intended to act as a temporary spacer, creating a physical barrier between tissues in the shoulder, for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and include the following: ( i ) Evaluation of improvement of shoulder function and reduction of symptoms (*e.g.,* pain and function) for the indications for use; and
( ii ) Evaluation of relevant adverse events.
( 2 ) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and include the following: ( i ) Integrity testing of the device, including mechanical and chemical stability; and
( ii ) Characterization of the device degradation profile.
( 3 ) Animal performance testing must include evaluation of the following: ( i ) Adverse effects, including gross necropsy and histopathology; and
( ii ) Device degradation to verify in vitro versus in vivo degradation correlation.
( 4 ) All patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 5 ) Performance data must support the sterility and pyrogenicity of the device components intended to be sterile.
( 6 ) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
( 7 ) Labeling must include the following: ( i ) Instruction for use, including specific instructions regarding device selection and placement;
( ii ) A detailed summary of the clinical performance testing with the device, including procedure- and device-related complications or adverse events; and
( iii ) A shelf life.
[87 FR 981, Jan. 6, 2023]
§ 1.401(a)-30 Limit on elective deferrals. ( a ) *General Rule.* A trust that is part of a plan under which elective deferrals may be made during a calendar year is not qualified under section 401(a) unless the plan provides that the elective deferrals on behalf of an individual under the plan and all other plans, contracts, or arrangements of the employer maintaining the plan may not exceed the applicable limit for the individual's taxable year beginning in the calendar year. A plan may incorporate the applicable limit by reference. In the case of a plan maintained by more than one employer to which section 413 (b) or (c) applies, section 401(a)(30) and this section are applied as if each employer maintained a separate plan. See § 1.402(g)-1(e) for rules permitting the distribution of excess deferrals to prevent disqualification of a plan or trust for failure to comply in operation with section 401(a)(30).
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Applicable limit.* The term “applicable limit” has the meaning provided in § 1.402(g)-1(d).
( 2 ) *Elective deferrals.* The term “elective deferrals” has the meaning provided in § 1.402(g)-1(b).
( c ) *Effective date* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (c), this section is effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 1987.
( 2 ) *Transition rule.* For plan years beginning in l988, a plan may rely on a reasonable interpretation of the law as in effect on December 31, 1987.
( 3 ) *Deferrals under collective bargaining agreements.* In the case of a plan maintained pursuant to one or more collective bargaining agreements between employee representatives and one or more employers ratified before March 1, 1986, this section does not apply to contributions made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement for plan years beginning before the earlier of: ( i ) The later of January 1, 1988, or the date on which the last collective bargaining agreement terminates (determined without regard to any extension thereof after February 28, 1986), or
( ii ) January 1, 1989.
[T.D. 8357, 56 FR 40516, Aug. 15, 1991]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

417 

CA 13-01154 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

PATRICIA KARAM, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE 

ESTATE OF TONY KARAM, DECEASED, AND PATRICIA 

KARAM, INDIVIDUALLY, 

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT,

 

V ORDER

ADIRONDACK NEUROSURGICAL SPECIALISTS, P.C., 

ET AL., DEFENDANTS, 

ST. ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER AND TIMOTHY 

EDWARD PAGE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

JOEL M. KOTICK, NEW YORK CITY, POWERS & SANTOLA, LLP, ALBANY (MICHAEL

J. HUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT. 

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (LAURENCE F. SOVIK OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. 

 

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court,

Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered May 21, 2013 in a

medical malpractice and wrongful death action. The order, among other

things, denied plaintiff’s motion to renew. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8146 

To require a report by the Attorney General on the impact the border 

crisis is having on law enforcement at the Federal, State, local, and 

Tribal level. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Mr. D’ESPOSITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require a report by the Attorney General on the impact 

the border crisis is having on law enforcement at the 

Federal, State, local, and Tribal level. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Police Our Border Act 

5 of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds as follows: 

8 (1) Our Federal, State, local, and Tribal law 

9 enforcement officers put their lives on the line each 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8146 IH

1 day in order to protect our country and serve their 

2 communities. 

3 (2) According to the National Law Enforce4 ment Officer Memorial Fund, 136 law enforcement 

5 officers died in the line of duty in 2023. 

6 (3) Congress should do everything in its power 

7 to support law enforcement officers at every level 

8 and in every part of our Nation. 

9 (4) The southwest border crisis created by the 

10 Biden Administration has made every State a border 

11 State. 

12 (5) The Biden border crisis has placed a burden 

13 on law enforcement agencies across the Nation and 

14 has placed a significant strain on the resources that 

15 are critical to keeping communities safe. 

16 (6) Law enforcement officers in every State are 

17 put in life-threatening scenarios as a direct result of 

18 the open borders. 

19 (7) Law enforcement has been forced to deal 

20 with the influx of fentanyl and many officers are ex21 posed to the drug while on duty. 

22 (8) It is in the best interest of law enforcement 

23 officers and the communities they serve for Congress 

24 to pass, and the President to sign into law, strong 

25 border security legislation. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8146 IH

1 SEC. 3. ANNUAL REPORT. 

2 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

3 of this Act, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress 

4 a report on the impact the Biden border crisis is having 

5 on law enforcement officers at the Federal, State, local, 

6 and Tribal level, including— 

7 (1) the estimated dollar amount of all resources 

8 devoted to addressing the Biden border crisis, and 

9 the extent to which such resources are not available 

10 to law enforcement agencies; 

11 (2) the exposure of law enforcement officers to 

12 fentanyl resulting from encounters with illegal aliens 

13 at the border and in the United States; 

14 (3) injuries to law enforcement officers based 

15 on a connection to the Biden border crisis or expo16 sure to fentanyl; and 

17 (4) the morale of law enforcement officers. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8123 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish new 

prohibited acts relating to dietary supplements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2024 

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

establish new prohibited acts relating to dietary supplements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEW PROHIBITED ACTS RELATING TO DIETARY 

4 SUPPLEMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 301 of the Federal Food, 

6 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331) is amended by 

7 adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(jjj) The introduction or delivery for introduction 

9 into interstate commerce of any product marketed as a 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8123 IH

1 dietary supplement that does not meet the definition of 

2 a dietary supplement under section 201(ff). 

3 ‘‘(kkk) The introduction or delivery for introduction 

4 into interstate commerce of a dietary supplement that has 

5 been prepared, packed, or held using the assistance of, or 

6 at the direction of, a person debarred under section 306.’’. 

7 (b) NEW IMPORT EXCLUSION.—Section 801(a) of the 

8 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 381(a)) 

9 is amended in paragraph (3) of the third sentence, by 

10 striking ‘‘section 301(ll)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (ll), 

11 (jjj), or (kkk) of section 301’’. 

12 (c) NEW SEIZURE AUTHORITIES.—Section 304 of the 

13 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 334) 

14 is amended— 

15 (1) in subsection (a)(1), in the first sentence, 

16 by striking ‘‘section 301(ll)’’ and inserting ‘‘para17 graph (ll), (jjj), or (kkk) of section 301’’; and 

18 (2) in subsection (d)(1), in the first sentence, 

19 by striking ‘‘or cosmetic’’ and inserting ‘‘cosmetic, 

20 or product in violation of paragraph (jjj) or (kkk) of 

21 section 301’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0411

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

RYAN SCOTT BROADBROOKS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 1, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 25 2021

03/25/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0411
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RENITA CHARLES,

Appellant,

v.

CLIFFORD CHARLES,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1812

[May 23, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Susan Lebow, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE23-

000221.

Renita Charles, Pembroke Pines, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8119 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8119

 To establish in U.S. Customs and Border Protection a pilot program to 
 adopt dogs from local animal shelters to be trained as therapy dogs, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2024

 Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas (for himself, Mr. Correa, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. 
 Davis of North Carolina, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Lawler, Mr. D'Esposito, 
 Mr. Luttrell, Mr. McCaul, Ms. Mace, Ms. Jackson Lee, and Ms. Salazar) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish in U.S. Customs and Border Protection a pilot program to 
 adopt dogs from local animal shelters to be trained as therapy dogs, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Emotional Assistance with 
Relief and Love Act'' or the ``PEARL Act''.

SEC. 2. CBP THERAPY DOG PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting 
through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), 
shall establish in CBP a pilot program to adopt dogs from local animal 
shelters to be trained as therapy dogs.
    (b) Funding.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall reimburse 
the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection for any costs 
associated with the pilot program under subsection (a).
    (c) Duration.-- The pilot program under subsection (a) shall 
terminate three years after the date of its establishment.

SEC. 3. CBP SUPPORT CANINE PROGRAM.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection $1,000,000 for CBP's Support Canine Program.
                                 <all>
```
§ 876.1050 Endoscopic transhepatic venous access needle. ( a ) *Identification.* An endoscopic transhepatic venous access needle is inserted through the liver into the patient's portal/hepatic venous system under endoscopic ultrasound guidance. It is connected to a separate device intended to measure a physiological parameter.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 2 ) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the patient-contacting components of the device.
( 3 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be non-pyrogenic.
( 4 ) Performance testing must support the shelf life of device components provided sterile by demonstrating continued sterility and package integrity over the labeled shelf life.
( 5 ) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following must be tested: ( i ) Needle crumple testing;
( ii ) Tensile testing;
( iii ) Dimensional verification for all components; and
( iv ) Simulated use testing.
( 6 ) Labeling must include the following: ( i ) Instructions for use, including specific instructions regarding device preparation;
( ii ) The recommended training for safe use of the device; and
( iii ) A shelf life for any sterile components.
[86 FR 71145, Dec. 15, 2021]
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial
Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor401 South Tryon StreetCharlotte,
NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2015, by
and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,
LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Operating Advisor, CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator
and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33
(the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage
Services do hereby certify that:



|1. |  | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December
31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under
my supervision, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.                                                       



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
the 28th day of February 2017.



|/s/ Daniel Bober         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober             | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F E RNA ND O A B E L HU E R T A C AC HO ; SAND RA RI VERO FR AY SS I NET, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E RJ r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74421 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 190- 477

A 095- 190- 478 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B e f o r e : R Y M E R , M c K E O W N , an dP A E Z , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . F e rnando A be l H ue rt aC a c ho, and S andr aR i ve r o F r ay s s i ne t , na t i ve s and citi ze n s o f M ex ico , p etit io n fo r r ev iew o f th e B o ar do f I m m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng thei r app ea l , w hi ch the B IA construed as a m ot i on t o reopen 

# FI LED APR14 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74421 2 r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u an t to 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . R e y es v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 5 8 F . 3 d5 9 2 , 5 9 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e o p e n b a s e do n its f

in d in g th a t, e v e n if

th e m o tio n w a s tim e ly , p e titio n e r s f a ile dto s a t i s f ythe pr oc e dur a l r e qui r e m e nt s s e tf orth i n M at te rof L oz ada , 19 I. & N . D ec . 637, 689 ( B I A 1988) , and the i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e the ya l l e ge i s notpl a i n on the f a c e o f th e r e c o r d . Se e id . a t597- 99. T he pet i t i on er s c on t ent i on the B IA erre d b y denyi ng the m ot i on t o reopen w ith o u t o u t c o n s id e r in g th a t it w a s ajo in t r e q u e s t to r e o p e n . W e r e je c t th is c ont e nt i on be c aus e i ti s be l i e d bythe r e c or d – the gove rnm e ntdi d notj oi n i n the r e q u e s t to r e o p e n . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the three months
of which the quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the three months covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants three months
then ended that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: February 14, 2006/s/ Daniel J. ReganDaniel J. ReganVice President andChief Financial OfficerGreat Western Land and Recreation, Inc.
 23