alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly report of Fonix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Thomas
A. Murdock and Roger D. Dudley, President and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of our knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Thomas A. Murdock
------------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Murdock
President
Date: August 30, 2002



 /s/ Roger D. Dudley
----------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Dudley
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 30, 2002




                                       36
#### § 1.5000C-7 Effective/applicability date.

Section 5000C applies to specified Federal procurement payments received pursuant to contracts entered into on and after January 2, 2011. Sections 1.5000C-1 through 1.5000C-7 apply on and after November 16, 2016. Contracting parties and acquiring agencies may rely upon the rules in the regulations before such date. If a foreign contracting party fully satisfies its tax and filing obligations under section 5000C with respect to any payments received in tax years ending before November 16, 2016 on or before the later of November 16, 2016 or the due date for the foreign person's income tax return for the year in which the payment was received in a manner consistent with the final regulations, penalties will not be asserted on the foreign contracting parties with respect to those payments or returns.

[T.D. 9782, 81 FR 55138, Aug. 18, 2016]

Returns and Records
Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Form 10-Q of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, I, Michael Dinkins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hilb Rogal &
Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) the
information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries
as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                                      |  |  |  |       |  |            
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -----------
|    |  |                                                                      |  | 
|By: |  | /s/    Michael Dinkins                                               |  |  |  | Date: |  | May 4, 2006
|    |  | Michael Dinkins Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |       |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,737
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       190,688
<OTHER-SE>                                    (240,425)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,505)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
39355.

#### OLIVER v. IRVIN.

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

This is a processioning case. After the processioners had filed their return in the court of ordinary, Irvin, an adjoining landowner, filed, on March 27, 1956, a protest to the return solely on the ground that the line, as run by the processioners along his property, was not the true line. After the case was transmitted to the superior court *845
      *(Code*§ 85-1609), and on March 21, 1961, the protestant amended his original protest and on the same day filed a pleading which he denominated a motion to dismiss containing seven grounds, two of the grounds being, in substance, that the applicant held only a life estate in the lands, the lines of which he sought to have processioned, and that he did not join the remaindermen in the processioning proceeding and that there was, therefore, a nonjoinder of necessary parties. This pleading was not verified by the protestant. The trial judge, in an order expressly deferring consideration of other grounds, sustained these two grounds of the motion to dismiss, and the exception here is to that judgment. *Held:*

1. The protestant designated this pleading as a motion to dismiss. So viewed, it properly raised the question as to the nonjoinder of necessary parties. *Smith v. Mitchell,*6 Ga. 458 (1); *Sowell v. Sowell,*212 Ga. 351 (92 SE2d 524). (Cf. *Merritt v. Bagwell,*70 Ga. 578 (3a), and *Haynes v. Thrift Credit Union,*192 Ga. 229, 233 (2), 14 SE2d 871, with respect to the manner of raising an issue as to the nonjoinder of mere proper parties). The remaindermen were necessary parties to the proceeding and should have been joined either as applicants or as defendants in the processioning proceeding so that they would be bound by any judgment ultimately entered in the case. ' This is so because the law provides that “Every owner of land . . . who desires the lines around his entire tract to be surveyed and marked anew, shall apply to the processioners . . .to appoint a day when a majority of them, with the county surveyor, will trace and mark the said lines.” *Code*§ 85-1605. A vested remainderman in lands has a present estate or interest therein which has the character of absolute ownership (Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., p. 1734) and though the enjoyment of the interest is postponed to the future, it is, nevertheless, a present interest which may be sold by conveyance devised by will or levied on and sold under process. *Gibbons v. International Harvester Co.,*146 Ga. 467 (2) (91 SE 482); *Ragan v. Rogers,*146 Ga. 818 (92 SE 647). While it is recognized that remaindermen are not joint tenants with the life tenant, they do, nevertheless, have such an interest in the estate in common with the life tenant that they are necessary parties to the processioning proceeding. *846
      *Carmichael v. Jordan,*131 Ga. 514 (62 SE 810). The trial court did not err in sustaining the motion to dismiss.

Decided May 1, 1962.

*Herbert B. Kimzey, Kimzey & Kimzey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Kimzey & Crawford,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eberhardt and Bussell, JJ., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

      ( print page 37979)    
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the Tennessee Advisory Committee to the Commission (Committee) will convene at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at about 3 p.m. on Monday, August 24, 2009, at the Disabled Student Services Center, Keathley University Center, Middle Tennessee State University, Tennessee, 37132. The purpose of the meeting is for the Committee to plan future projects for fiscal year 2010.

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The comments must be received in the regional office by September 24, 2009. The mailing address is: Southern Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St., SW., Suite 18T40, Atlanta, GA 30303. Persons wishing to e-mail their written comments may do so to                     *pminari@usccr.gov.*                     Persons who desire additional information should contact the Southern Regional Office, at (404) 562-7000, or by e-mail at                     *pminarik@usccr.gov.*

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meetings and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from these meetings may be inspected and reproduced at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, July 27, 2009.

Peter Minarik,

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. E9-18207 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38170-38171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18385]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XO28


Listing Endangered and Threatened Species: Initiation of a Status 
Review for the Oregon Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit of Coho 
Salmon

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Reopening of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On April 29, 2009, we, NMFS, announced the initiation of a 
status review under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the Oregon 
Coast coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) evolutionarily significant 
unit (ESU). As part of that proposal, we provided a 90-

[[Page 38171]]

day comment period, ending on July 28, 2009. We have received requests 
for an extension of the public comment period. In response to these 
requests, we are reopening the comment period for the proposed action.

DATES: Information and comments on the subject action must be received 
by August 18, 2009.

ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments, identified by 0648-XO28, by any of 
the following methods:
    <bullet> Fax: 503-230-5441
    <bullet> Mail: Submit written comments and information to Chief, 
NMFS, Protected Resources Division, 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 
1100, Portland, OR 97232. You may hand-deliver written comments to our 
office during normal business hours at the street address given above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For further information regarding 
this notice contact Garth Griffin, NMFS, Northwest Region, (503) 231-
2005; or Marta Nammack, NMFS, Office of Protected Resources, (301) 713-
1401.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 29, 2009, we announced the 
initiation of a status review under the ESA for the Oregon Coast coho 
salmon ESU. As part of that proposal, we provided a 90-day comment 
period, ending on July 28, 2009. We have received requests for an 
extension of the public comment period. In response to these requests, 
we are reopening the comment period for the proposed action. The public 
comment period closed on July 28, 2009. We are reopening the public 
comment period until August 21, 2009, to receive additional local and 
public information and comments that may be relevant to the status 
review. Public comments received between the close of the first comment 
period on July 28, 2009, and the reopening of the comment period July 
31, 2009 will also be considered timely.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.

    Dated: July 27, 2009.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-18385 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					   
 
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of uranium-bearing veins in the conterminous United 
States

#### Professional Paper 455-A-F

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (18972 pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                 (2936 
  pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp455AF 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:09
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 2136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL10-31-000]


City of Pasadena, CA; Notice of Filing

January 6, 2010.
    Take notice that on December 30, 2009, City of Pasadena, California 
filed its fifth annual revision to its Transmission Revenue Balancing 
Account Adjustment, consistent with its Transmission Owner Tariff and 
the California Independent System Operator Corporation Electric Tariff, 
CASIO Tariff, Appendix F, Schedule 3, Sec.  8.1 Original Sheet No. 
1215, to become effective January 1, 2010.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#571112051418393b3e393204222727382523173132253479303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 20, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-523 Filed 1-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  Exhibit 31.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 
 I, Gary De Laurentiis, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Itec Environmental Group, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 August 20, 2004
  Gary De LaurentiisPrincipal Financial Officer