Exhibit 34.2

 

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

Citibank, N.A.:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank,N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB (the “Servicing Criteria”) for publicly-issued (*i.e.*, transaction-level reportinginitially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately-issued (*i.e.*, for whichtransaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipmentloan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, as listed in Appendix A of theaccompanying Management’s Assessment of Compliance, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the“Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii),1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performswith respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. With respect to the Platform, ServicingCriterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliancewith the Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance with the Servicing Criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance withthe standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance with attestation standards establishedby the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants to obtain reasonable assurance and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Servicing Criteria and performing such other proceduresas we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securitiesthat comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Companyprocessed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Servicing Criteria. Furthermore,our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period coveredby this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent toour tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis forour opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the Servicing Criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,2017 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 23, 2018