alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United St ates District Judge for the District of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-1420

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Jodi Lynn Richter, * also known as Nurse Betty, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 2011 Filed: October 14, 2011

___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Jodi Richter challenges the sentence imposed by the district court 1 upon her guilty plea to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute in excess of 500 grams of a methamphetamine mixture. She entered her guilty plea pursuant to a written plea agr eement that contained an appeal waiver. Her counsel moves to withdr aw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), acknowledging the appeal waiver, but arguing that a defendant-2- should be permitted to seek appellate review of the judgment and imposition of sentence by the district court notwithsta nding an appeal waiver. Richter seeks appointment of new counsel.
We conclude that this appeal is barred by the appeal waiver. The appeal falls within the scope of the wa iver; the record establishes that Richter knowingly and voluntarily entered into both the plea agreem ent and the appeal waiver; and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc ) (setting forth criteria for enforcing appeal waiver). We have also review ed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and we havefound no non-frivolous issue for appeal beyond the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we deny Richter’s motion for new counsel.

______________________________
# C_2014431EN.01004401.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/44

---

Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition v OHIM — H. Young Holdings (animal)

(Case T-727/14)

(2014/C 431/68)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition (New Brunswick, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H. Young Holdings plc (Newbury, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘animal’ — Community trade mark No 2 8 22  807

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 July 2014 in Case R 2054/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 196

To authorize the printing of additional copies of a Senate report entitled

‘‘Developments in Aging: 1993’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. PRYOR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of additional copies of a Senate

report entitled ‘‘Developments in Aging: 1993’’.

1 Resolved, That there shall be printed for the use of

2 the Special Committee on Aging, in addition to the usual

3 number of copies, the maximum number of copies of vol4 umes 1 and 2 of the annual report of the committee to

5 the Senate, entitled ‘‘Developments in Aging: 1993’’,

6 which additional copies may be printed at a cost not to

7 exceed $1,200.

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPeculiarities of Efficient Plasma Generation in Air and Water by Short Duration Laser PulsesWe have conducted experiments to demonstrate an efficient generation of plasma discharges by focused nanosecond pulsed laser beams in air and provided recommendations on the design of optical systems to implement such plasma generation. We have also demonstrated generation of the secondary plasma discharge using the unused energy from the primary one. Focused nanosecond pulsed laser beams have also been utilized to generate plasma in water where we observed self-focusing and filamentation. Furthermore, we applied the laser generated plasma to the decomposition of methylene blue dye diluted in water.Document ID20170003884Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAdamovsky, Grigory*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Floyd, Bertram M.*(HX5 Sierra, LLC Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredApril 25, 2017Publication DateApril 1, 2017Subject CategoryPlasma PhysicsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN39349NASA/TM-2017-219483E-19351Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 110076.01.03.01.01CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC15BA02BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsPlasmaAvailable DownloadsNameType20170003884.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Frederick W. Smith, Jr., Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of Itec Environmental Group, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2004 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Frederick W. Smith, Jr.

Frederick W. Smith, Jr.

Acting Chief Financial Officer



November 15, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Itec Environmental Group, Inc. and will be retained by Itec Environmental Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MBIA Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Edward Chaplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ C. Edward Chaplin  
|C. Edward Chaplin      
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 10, 2010
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3410

___________________________ Terry D. Owens lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Central Bank #K00002095; Central Bank #X00126219; Central Trust Bank, a non-registered entity, also known as The Central Trust Bank, also known as The Central Trust Bank, Charter #U00000057; James Gerling, Bankcard Officer; Al Stonum, Jr., Vice President & Bank Card Director; Central Bank #X00189569

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________ Submitted: June 19, 2020 Filed: June 24, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Missouri resident Terry D. Owens appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of two

post-judgment motions filed 4 years after the dismissal of his pro se complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. This court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage , 408 F.3d 1043, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5118]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on Cemeteries and Memorials will be held April 28-
29, 2010, at the Houston Airport Marriott, 18700 John F. Kennedy 
Boulevard, Houston, Texas, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting is open 
to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of national cemeteries, soldiers' lots 
and plots, the selection of new national cemetery sites, the erection 
of appropriate memorials, and the adequacy of Federal burial benefits.
    On April 28, the Committee will receive updates on National 
Cemetery Administration issues. On April 29, the Committee will tour 
Houston National Cemetery, located at 10410 Veterans Memorial Drive, 
Houston, Texas, and then reconvene at the hotel for a business session 
in the afternoon. On April 29, the Committee will discuss Committee 
recommendations, future meeting sites, and potential agenda topics at 
future meetings. Time will be allocated for receiving public comments 
at 1 p.m. Public comments will be limited to three minutes each. 
Individuals wishing to make oral statements before the Committee will 
be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Individuals who 
speak are invited to submit 1-2 page summaries of their comments at the 
time of the meeting for inclusion in the official meeting record.
    Members of the public may direct questions or submit written 
statements for review by the Committee in advance of the meeting to Mr. 
Michael Nacincik, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, National Cemetery Administration (41C2), 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ade0c4cec5ccc8c183c3eddbcc83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="672a0e040f06020b490927110649000811">[email protected]</span></a>. In the 
public's communications with the Committee, the writers must identify 
themselves and state the organizations, associations, or persons they 
represent. Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting 
should contact Mr. Nacincik at (202) 461-6240.

    Dated: March 5, 2010.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-5118 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,137]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 18, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of J.T. Posey Company/Arcadia Manufacturing Group, Arcadia, California.

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification, (TA-W-61,804) which expires on September 18, 2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of June, 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-18044 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[115th Congress Public Law 20]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 86]]

Public Law 115-20
115th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior 
relating to ``Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation 
        and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 
           Alaska''. <<NOTE: Apr. 3, 2017 -  [H.J. Res. 69]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to ``Non-
Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure 
Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska'' (81 Fed. Reg. 52247 
(August 5, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

    Approved April 3, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res 69:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Feb. 16, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8115 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8115

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow for the deferral 
   or disallowance of portions of payments for certain managed care 
                       violations under Medicaid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2024

 Mr. Sarbanes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow for the deferral 
   or disallowance of portions of payments for certain managed care 
                       violations under Medicaid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWING FOR THE DEFERRAL OR DISALLOWANCE OF PORTIONS OF 
              PAYMENTS FOR CERTAIN MANAGED CARE VIOLATIONS UNDER 
              MEDICAID.

    (a) In General.--Section 1903(m)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396(m)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and (G)'' and 
        inserting ``(G), and (I)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(I)(i) In lieu of applying the payment prohibition under 
subparagraph (A) for a violation of any requirement described in such 
subparagraph, the Secretary may defer or disallow a portion of a 
payment to a State described in such subparagraph (as determined 
appropriate by the Secretary) if the Secretary finds that such a 
deferral or disallowance more appropriately reflects the scope of such 
violation than application of such prohibition.
    ``(ii) If the Secretary determines subsequent to a deferral or 
disallowance of a portion of a payment under clause (i) for a violation 
by an entity of any requirement described in subparagraph (A) that such 
deferral or disallowance was insufficient to bring such entity into 
compliance with such requirement, the Secretary may apply the payment 
prohibition under subparagraph (A).''.
    (b) Treatment of Certain State Managed Care Requirements.--Section 
1902(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (86), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (87)(D), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (87) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(88) in the case the State elects the option to use 
        managed care under section 1932, provide for compliance with 
        the requirements of such section.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015034EN.01004902.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/49

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — Iliopoulou v Europol

(Case F-21/14) (1)

1

((Civil service - Europol staff - Europol Convention - Europol Staff Regulations - Decision 2009/371/JHA - Application of the Conditions of Employment to Europol staff - Non-renewal of a temporary fixed-term contract - Refusal to grant a temporary contract for an indefinite term))

(2015/C 034/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hariklia Iliopoulou (Wassenaar, Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: J. Arnould and D. Neumann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision to not renew, for an indefinite duration, the applicant’s fixed-term contract and to order Europol to pay her the difference between the amount of remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she continued to carry out her duties and the unemployment benefits or any other allowance in lieu which she has received.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed.

| 2. | The European Police Office shall bear its own costs and is ordered to cover half of the costs incurred by Ms Iliopoulou. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Police Office shall bear its own costs and is ordered to cover half of the costs incurred by Ms Iliopoulou.

| 3. | Ms Iliopoulou shall bear half of her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Ms Iliopoulou shall bear half of her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 16/6/2014, p. 42.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         119,553
<SECURITIES>                                   136,596
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               422,975
<PP&E>                                         125,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 996,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          320,233
<BONDS>                                        262,250
<COMMON>                                         6,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     400,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   996,483
<SALES>                                      1,275,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,294,027
<CGS>                                          893,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,255,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,913
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,661
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,661
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>