alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MBIA Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph W. Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Joseph W. Brown    
|Joseph W. Brown        
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 10, 2010
## ( NSCAPCD amended 2/23/82/

### _;;j;;_;;.jSy RULE 220 NEH SOURCE REVIE\·1 STAND.?-.RDS (INCLUDING PSD EVALUATIONS)) (a}
**E~ission** Ana1vsis In **:evi~wing** an **A~thority** to **C=~str~=t** for any n2w or r.tOC.i£ied £;t.ationary source- suh:iect: to the r**<~quirehlen**ts of this chapter, the Control Officer

**s~all** require the applicant to submit information sufficientto describe the nature and amounts of emissions; the location, design, construction, and ooeration of the source; and to submit any additional information requestedby the Control Officer to make the approval determinationsrequired by the provisions of Rule 230.

**~** putDOSes

**~** emissionconsjderat;ons:

(l) 

### -f3-t-Emissionsfrom a proposed new or modified source shall be based on the source's potential to emit any air contaminant subject to regulation under the CleanAir. Act of 1977. (40 CFR 52.2l(b)(4))

(3) Emissions from a .proposed modified **stationa~** source shall be based upon the cumulativenet emission increases or reductions that 

### may occur as a result of the modifications

### andsubsequentoperating permit conditions, excluding 

### any emissions reductions required to comply with federal, state, or district laws, rules or regulations. (40 CFR 52.2l(b)(2 & 3))

**~**Emissions from 

### an existing stationary or previously permitted source shall gcner:..,.,:.:: be based on the actual rate of air contaminant emissions during the two year period of operation prior to the date of application 

### -o=-

**spea~~io ~~=iting**  **p£rmi~ ce~diti~z.**  A different averaging period may be

**~sed** if the applicant demonst·rates to the satisfactic:1 of the Control Officer that 

### it would bemore represer:tative of norma1 source operation. (40 CFR 52.2l{b)(3 & 21))
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 200 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 200

 Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Secretary 
                             of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 19 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

 Mr. Mitchell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a Secretary 
                             of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives be notified of the 
election of the Honorable Martha S. Pope as Secretary of the Senate.

                                 <all>
```
```

[House Document 115-46]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

115th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 115-46

 
OMB FINAL SEQUESTRATION REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS FOR FISCAL 
                               YEAR 2017

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

           THE DIRECTOR, THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

                              transmitting

 OMB'S FINAL SEQUESTRATION REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017, PURSUANT TO 2 
U.S.C. 904(f)(1); PUBLIC LAW 99-177, SEC. 254 (AS AMENDED BY PUBLIC LAW 
                   112-25, SEC. 103); (125 STAT. 246)

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

  June 8, 2017.--Referred to the Committee on the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed
              
              
                                   _________ 
                                  
                         U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
                         
69-011                           WASHINGTON : 2017       
              
              
              
              
              
              
                 Executive Office of the President,
                           Office of Management and Budget,
                                      Washington, DC, May 19, 2017.
Hon. Paul D. Ryan,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Enclosed please find the OMB Final 
Sequestration Report to the President and Congress for Fiscal 
Year 2017, which has been prepared pursuant to section 254 of 
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
(BBEDCA). This report was originally due 15 days after the end 
of the last Congressional session. However, section 184 of the 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2017 (division C of Public Law 
114-223, as amended by division A of Public Law 114-254 and 
further amended by Public Law 115-30) delayed the report until 
15 days after expiration of the 2017 continuing resolution.
    As required by BBEDCA, this report provides the Office of 
Management and Budget's (OMB) current estimates of the 
discretionary spending limits for each category, OMB's scoring 
of the enacted 2017 discretionary appropriations bills compared 
to those limits, and comparisons of OMB's estimates with the 
estimates provided by the Congressional Budget Office in its 
Final Sequestration Report for Fiscal Year 2017.
    Based on the estimates in this report, enacted 
appropriations are within the discretionary spending limits for 
2017, and a sequestration of discretionary budget authority 
pursuant to section 251 of BBEDCA is not required.
            Sincerely,
                                             Mick Mulvaney,
                                                          Director.
    Enclosure.
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

July 23, 2009.
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, and 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before August 28, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

Financial Management Service (FMS)

    OMB Number: 1510-0008.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Pools and Associations--Annual Letter.
    Description: Information collected determines acceptable percent 
for each pool and association Treasury Certified companies are given 
credit for on Treasury Schedule F for authorized ceded reinsurance in 
arriving at each insurance company's underwritting limit.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 126 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Wesley Powe (202) 874-7662, Financial Management 
Service, Room 135, 3700 East West Highway, Hyattsville, MD 20782.
    OMB Reviewer: OIRA Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, 
Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3acaab1a29cb0b6a1aeaab0b0aaacad83acaea1eda6acb3eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66090f1407391513040b0f15150f090826090b044803091648010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-18113 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Monetary Policy and the Management of the Public Debt

              																	United States. Congress. Joint Committee on the Economic Report. Subcommittee on General Credit Control and Debt Management					 and 	Eighty-Second Congress, 1951-1953. 						*Monetary Policy and the Management of the Public Debt : Report of the Subcommittee on General Credit Control and Debt Management of the Joint Committee on the Economic Report, Congress of the United States*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										June 26, 1952,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/414,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32.02

|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER    
|REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)
|AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT   
|OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350             

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Williams Controls, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis E. Bunday, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with
 the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934; and                              
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained in
 the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
 and result of operations of the Company.

|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DENNIS E. BUNDAY   
|                       
|Dennis E. Bunday       
|Chief Financial Officer
|Williams Controls, Inc.
|February 5, 2009       

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2571

TIBOR GUENTHER HORWATH; CHRISTEL HORWATH,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

(Tax Ct. No. 02-16927)

Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 29, 2005

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tibor Guenther Horwath, Christel Horwath, Appellants Pro Se.

Andrea R. Tebbets, Karen Grace Gregory, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tibor and Christel Horwath appeal from the tax court’s

order upholding the Commissioner’s assessment of deficiencies and

accuracy-related penalties with respect to their 1997 and 1998

federal income tax liability. Our review of the record and the tax

court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Horwath v.

Comm’r, IRS, No. 02-16927 (U.S. Tax Ct. Sept. 21, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
427 A.2d 1232

#### Brozanski v. Metz Construction Co., Inc., a corp. et al. Appeal of Metz Constr. Co., Inc.

Argued November 14, 1979.

James F. Manley, for appellant;

James B. Cole, for appellee.

*642Before SPAETH, HOFFMAN and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

The judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed.
Order entered April 28 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00473

- CV

IN RE LEXON INSURANCE COMP ANY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 06030



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We DENY relator’s emergency motion to stay proceedings in the trial court pending

determination of the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We ORDER that relator bear the

costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20285]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0558; FRL-8883-7]

Cancellation of Pesticides for Non-Payment of Year 2011 
Registration Maintenance Fees; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of July 27, 2011, 
concerning cancellation of pesticides for non-payment of year 2011 
registration maintenance fees. This document is being issued to correct 
Table 2 of the cancellation notice by removing five entries which were 
inadvertently included.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Jamula, Information Technology 
and Resources Management Division (7502P), Office of Pesticide 
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 305-6426; e-mail 
address: jamula.john@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    The Agency included in the July 27, 2011 notice a list of those who 
may be potentially affected by this action. If you have questions 
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, 
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0558. Publicly 
available docket materials are available either in the electronic 
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard 
copy, at the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public 
Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal 
Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are 
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.

II. What Does This Correction Do?

    This notice is being issued to correct Table 2 of the cancellation 
notice. This correction removes five entries which were inadvertently 
included as follows:
    FR Doc. 2011-18706 published in the Federal Register of July 27, 
2011 (76 FR 44907) (FRL-8879-8) is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 44908, in Table 2, remove the complete entry for: 
``003282-00092'' ``003282-00093,'' ``003282-00094,'' and ``003282-
00095.''
    2. On page 44910, in Table 2, remove the complete entry for 
``069876-00001.''

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Pesticides and pest.

    Dated: August 3, 2011.
Steven Bradbury,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2011-20285 Filed 8-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      ARMANINO FOODS OF DISTINCTION, INC.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc. for the period ending September
30, 2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc.



/s/ Edmond J. Pera
Edmond J. Pera
Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
November 4, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Armanino Foods of Distinction,
Inc. and will be retained by Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 1 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 2 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion ma y contain computer-generated errors or other 3 deviations from the official paper version file d by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 4 filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8

v. NO. 30,219 9 J. TYRONE RIORDAN, 10 Defendant-Appellant. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY 12 James Waylon Counts, District Judge 13 Gary K. King, Attorney General 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellee 16 J. Tyrone Riordan 17 Carrizozo, NM 18 Pro Se Appellant 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION 20 FRY, Chief Judge. 21 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. 22 No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and the time for doing 23 so has expired. DISMISSED. 2423 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1

2 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 3 WE CONCUR: 4

5 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 6

7 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 8
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1703

___________ Ronald Payton, * * Appellee, *

* v. * * Community Counseling Services, Inc., * * Appellant. *

__________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western No. 00-1831 District of Arkansas.

__________ [UNPUBLISHED] Ronald Payton, * * Appellant, *

* v. * * Community Counseling Services, Inc., * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 14, 2001 Filed: March 22, 2001

___________* The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

** The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. -2- Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and PERRY, * District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. CommunityCounseling Services, Inc. (CCS) terminated Ronald Payton's employment

as a business manager after Payton was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease and depression. Payton brought this disability discrimination action against CCS, and a jury concluded CCS intentionally discriminated against Payton and awarded $100,000 in compensatory damages. The district court ** granted Payton's postverdict

motion for equitable relief, awarding front pay instead of reinstatement based on the circumstances. The district court also granted Payton's request for attorney fees, but awarded only about two-thirds of the amount requested because Paytondid not prevail on all claims and the amount sought for pre-complaint services anddiscovery was excessive. On appeal, CCS first argues there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict because Payton was not a qualified individual with a disability and could not perform essential job functions. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the jury could reasonably find otherwise. CCS also asserts the district court committed error in refusing to allow CCS to impeach Payton with his earlier deposition testimony. The district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the evidence as cumulative, and any error was harmless. With respect to the postverdict

motion, CCS contends the district court should have awarded reinstatement rather than front pay, and in his cross-appeal, Payton contends the district court should have awarded the full amount of attorney fees requested. The district court applied the-3-

controlling law to the facts of the case, and did not abuse its discretion. We thus affirm the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.