alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              The Schedule contains summary financial
                              information extracted from the financial
                              statements for Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P. and is
                              qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854926
<NAME>                        Freedom Tax Credit Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                         5,515,461
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               3,353,482  
<PP&E>                         142,586,511
<DEPRECIATION>                 28,302,605 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 123,152,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          78,658,641 
<BONDS>                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<COMMON>                       0
<OTHER-SE>                     44,494,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   123,152,849
<SALES>                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               9,875,082
<CGS>                          0        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  0        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               9,964,656
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             3,752,337  
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (3,841,911)
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            0
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                  (3,841,911)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (51.55)    
<EPS-DILUTED>                  0          
                               

</TABLE>
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 31

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate

1 Resolved, That rule XV of the Standing Rules of the

2 Senate is amended by adding at the end thereof the follow3 ing new paragraph:

4 ‘‘6.(a) At any time following the second day of consid5 eration of a measure, regardless of the pendency, it shall

6 twice be in order during a calendar day to move that no

7 amendment, other than the reported committee amend8 ments, which is not relevant to the subject matter of the

9 measure or to the subject matter of an amendment pro10 posed by the committee which reported the measure, shall

11 thereafter be in order. The motion shall be privileged and

12 shall be decided after two hours of debate, without any
2

SRES 31 IS

1 intervening action, to be equally divided and controlled by

2 the Majority and the Minority leaders or their designees.

3 ‘‘(b) If a motion made under subparagraph (a) is

4 agreed to by an affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Sen5 ators voting, a quorum being present, no amendment not

6 already agreed to (except amendments proposed by the

7 committee which reported the measure) which is not rel8 evant to the subject matter of the measure, or the subject

9 matter of an amendment proposed by the committee which

10 reported the measure, shall be in order.

11 ‘‘(c) When a motion made under subparagraph (a)

12 has been agreed to as provided in subparagraph (b) with

13 respect to a measure, points of order with respect to ques14 tions of relevancy of amendments shall be decided without

15 debate, except that the Presiding Officer may entertain

16 debate for his own guidance prior to ruling on the point

17 of order. Appeals from the decision of the Presiding Offi18 cer on such points of order shall be decided without de19 bate.

20 ‘‘(d) Whenever an appeal is taken from a decision of

21 the Presiding Officer on the question of relevancy of an

22 amendment, or whenever the Presiding Officer submits

23 the question of relevancy of an amendment to the Senate,

24 the vote necessary to overturn the decision of the Presid25 ing Officer or hold the amendment relevant shall be three-
3

SRES 31 IS

1 fifths of the Senators voting, a quorum being present. No

2 amendment proposing sense of the Senate or sense of the

3 Congress language that does not directly relate to the

4 measure or matter before the Senate shall be considered

5 relevant.’’.

Æ
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 150

To authorize representation of Members of the Senate in the case of Douglas

R. Page v. Robert Dole, et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize representation of Members of the Senate in

the case of Douglas R. Page v. Robert Dole, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Douglas R. Page v. Robert Dole, et

al., No. 93–1546, pending in the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiff has

named ninety-nine Members of the Senate, and a former

Member, as defendants; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend present and former Members of the Senate in civil

actions relating to their official responsibilities: Now,

therefore, be it
2

SRES 150 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to represent the present and former Members of the Sen3 ate who are defendants in the case of Douglas R. Page

4 v. Robert Dole, et al.

Æ
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-89,133-01
EX P ARTE BRANDON LEE JE NK INS, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR31761-A INTHE 75 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM LIBERTY COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s co n v i cted of murder and
s e nten c e d to ninety -nine year s’ imprisonment. The Eig hth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his c o nv ic ti o n . Jenk ins v. State , 08-15-00366- CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Aug
. 23, 2017) (not designated for publication). The Court rema

nded the case to the trial court for finding s of fac t and co n cl u s i o n s o f law addre ssing Applicant’s claims. The trial court rec ommends denying relief
. We agree that Applicant has not proven harm under Strickland v. W ashington , 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). Ho we v er , we2

decline to adopt the trial court’s finding s concerning the defic ient performanc e prong of Strickland
. Relief is denied. Filed: April 22, 2020 Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                 
<ARTICLE> 5
                                  
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-1995

<CASH>                             4,219
<SECURITIES>                      41,195
<RECEIVABLES>                      8,752
<ALLOWANCES>                       1,214
<INVENTORY>                        2,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  59,987
<PP&E>                            16,331
<DEPRECIATION>                    10,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    67,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              6,177
<BONDS>                                0
<COMMON>                          61,661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                           179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      67,371
<SALES>                           38,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  38,453
<CGS>                             11,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     25,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    2,552
<INCOME-TAX>                         383
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       2,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .16
        




</TABLE>
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCEWITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION ABSERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31,2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the“CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS bythe Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “ApplicableServicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that theremaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC RegulationAB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to thetransactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this reportinclude all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQsystem (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Januar y 30, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00524

- CR

Braulio TIRADO

- MORALES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6200 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on January 11, 2019

. After n either t he

brief nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed , we notified appellant’s counsel

via letter that the brief was late and requested a response by no later than January 28, 2019. Appellant did not respond to our letter or file a brief or motion for extension of time to file the

brief.

Accordingly, a ppellant’s counsel is ORDERED to respond to this court in writing within

ten (10) days of the date of this order. The response should state a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant’s counsel fails to file an adequate response within ten (10) days, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court o n this 30th day of January, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
exv10w39



 





Exhibit 10.39



Tommy L. Andrews, Laura De Cespedes, Nelson G. Eng, George W. Gresham, Shailesh M. Kotwal and Kay
J. Nichols have entered into Transition Assistance Agreements that are substantially identical in
all respects to the Agreement with Clyde L. Thomas filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 294

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Republican leader.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Republican

leader.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the distinguished Republican leader, the Sen3 ator from Kansas, the Honorable Robert Dole, for his ex4 emplary leadership and the cooperative and dedicated

5 manner in which he has performed his leadership respon6 sibilities in the conduct of Senate business during the sec7 ond session of the One Hundred Third Congress.

Æ
NO. 07-03-0116-CR 07-03-0117-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 14, 2003

______________________________ ANNA DARLENE NORTH, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 242 ND DISTRIC T COURT O F SW ISHER COUN TY; NOS. B 3667-0112, B 3368-0112; HON ORABLE ED SELF , JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION Appellant

Anna DarleneNorth filed a Motion to Di smiss Appeal on May 13, 2003 , averringthat she no longer wishes t o prosecute her appeals. The Motion to Dismiss is signed by

both appellant and her attorney .2

Without passing on the merits of the case, appellant’ s motion for voluntary

dismissal is granted and th e appeals are her eby dismis sed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. H aving di smissed the appeals at appellant’s person al request, no motion for rehe aring will be entertained and our mandate wi ll issue fort hwith. Phil Johnson Chief Justice

Do not publish .
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8082 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8082

     To provide that certain actions by the Federal Communications 
               Commission shall have no force or effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2024

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide that certain actions by the Federal Communications 
               Commission shall have no force or effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing Local Communities Input in 
Broadband Development Act''.

SEC. 2 PRESERVATION OF RIGHTS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

    Actions by the Federal Communications Commission in ``Accelerating 
Wireless and Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to 
Infrastructure Investment'' (83 Fed. Reg. 51867) and the Federal 
Communications Commission's Declaratory Ruling in ``Third Report and 
Order and Declaratory Ruling'' (FCC 18-111) shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014282EN.01005501.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/55

---

Action brought on 2 July 2014 — Sertrans Catalunya v Commission

(Case T-504/14)

2014/C 282/73

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sertrans Catalunya, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. De Juan Casadevall, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, if the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (STLS) is held to be unlawful State aid, order recovery only until the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the decision initiating the formal investigation, namely, 21 September 2011; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, if the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (STLS) is held to be unlawful State aid, order recovery only until the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the decision initiating the formal investigation, namely, 21 September 2011; and

Official Journal of the European Union

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-500/14 Derivados del Flúor v Commission.

Derivados del Flúor

Commission

---
39423.

#### TRAILMOBILE, INC. v. COMBS.

Decided April 3, 1962.

Russell, Judge.

1. An action for trover against three named individuals as joint tortfeasors must be brought in a county where at least one of them resides. *Code Ann.*§ 2-4904; *Code*§ 3-201; *Hall v. Roehr & Co.,*10 Ga. App. 379 (73 SE 550); *Farmer v. Whitehead,*95 Ga. App. 520 (1) (98 SE2d 145).

2. Where the uncontradicted evidence on the trial of the plea to the jurisdiction in this bail trover proceeding established that neither the defendant who filed the plea nor his codefendants resided in Clayton County where the action was filed, but in another county in the State, a judgment sustaining the plea was demanded by the evidence, regardless of the fact that one or more of the defendants did in fact maintain a business office and address in Clayton County.

The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial from a judgment sustaining the plea to the jurisdiction filed by one of the defendants.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.*

*700
      *Preston L. Holland,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ted D.*Spears,.'contra.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18055]



[[Page 37735]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,113; TA-W-71,113A]


Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Climate Control, Inc., Franklin, IN, 
and Greenwood, IN; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on June 9, 2009, in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Mitsubishi Heavy 
Industries, Climate Control, Inc., Franklin, Indiana (TA-W-71,113), and 
Greenwood, Indiana (TA-W-71,113A).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18055 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
427 A.2d 1219

#### Commonwealth v. Griffin, Appellant.

Submitted June 29, 1979.

Joseph D. Montgomery, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, GATES and DOWLING, JJ.*

*

 President Judge G. Thomas Gates of the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, and Judge John C. Dowling of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, are sitting by designation.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 145 (Thursday, July 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18342]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Wednesday, August 19, 2009.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Enforcement Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-18342 Filed 7-28-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
# Official Journal L 227I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 227I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6316 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 227I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6316 July 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1023 of 15 July 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1765 as regards the cross-border exchange of data between national contact tracing and warning mobile applications with regard to combatting the COVID-19 pandemic (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1023 of 15 July 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1765 as regards the cross-border exchange of data between national contact tracing and warning mobile applications with regard to combatting the COVID-19 pandemic (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.