alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) plante moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

We have examined National TaxSearch, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certainservicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to theactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

Management is responsible forthe Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliancewith the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination wasconducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactionsand compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination periodand determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performedthose activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing ofselected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may haveoccurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this reportfor the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF 

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.4330 Cardiopulmonary bypass on-line blood gas monitor. ( a ) *Identification.* A cardiopulmonary bypass on-line blood gas monitor is a device used in conjunction with a blood gas sensor to measure the level of gases in the blood.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
- 492 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . SAVAGE Cite as 302 Neb. 492



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### . C ourt n ey 

### J. S avage 

### , appella n t



### . ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed March 15, 2019. No. S-17-1166.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: S usa n 

### I

. S tro n g 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modi

fied. Motion for rehearing overruled. Darik J. Von Loh, of Hernandez Frantz, Von Loh, appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Austin N. Relph for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller


### - L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , F u n ke 

### , P

apik 

### , and F reude n berg 

### , JJ.

P er 

### C uriam



### . This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Courtney J. Savage, concerning our opinion in State v. Savage , 301 Neb. 873, 920 N.W.2d 692 (2018). We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the subsection “(a) Authentication,” after the fourth sentence of the fourth paragraph, we insert the following language: As for Savage’s contention that the State did not properly authenticate messages sent to him by others, we again disagree. The State was required only to introduce testi

mony sufficient to establish that the evidence was what Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/03/2019 08:07 AM CDT- 493 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . SAVAGE Cite as 302 Neb. 492


### the State claimed it to be. The State did not claim that messages sent by others were anything more than mes

sages sent to Savage’s cell phone. See State v. Elseman , 287 Neb. 134, 841 N.W.2d 225 (2014). Savage , 301 Neb. at 885, 920 N.W.2d at 703. In subsection “(b) Hearsay,” following the second to the last paragraph, we insert the following paragraph: We also reject Savage’s argument that text messages sent to his cell phone by unidentified individuals contained inadmissible hearsay. Hearsay is “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the mat

ter asserted.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-801(3) (Reissue 2016). Messages sent to Savage’s cell phone were not offered for the truth of the matters asserted. They were offered to prove that the statements were made. Savage , 301 Neb. at 887, 920 N.W.2d at 704. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modified



### . M otio n for reheari n g overruled



### .
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from the unaudited
financial statements of MicroTel International, Inc., for the quarter ended
September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                        170,000 
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,406,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  260,000
<INVENTORY>                                 3,638,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            6,911,000
<PP&E>                                      2,980,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,292,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              9,970,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,824,000
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     9,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,346,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                9,970,000
<SALES>                                    12,039,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           12,039,000
<CGS>                                       7,359,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              13,078,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (98,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (38,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            165,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (941,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (941,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                (941,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.34)

        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-11946

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

DERRICK ALLEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J SANTIAGO,

Awp,

C MAIORANA,

Warden, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-11946 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11946

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 3:22-cv-03145-TKW-EMT

____________________

Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Allen, pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal 

without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as malicious under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He argues that the form complaint that he filled 

out was ambiguous, and that he did not intentionally misrepresent 

his litigation history or otherwise act in bad faith. 

We review for abuse of discretion a sua sponte dismissal under § 1915A(b)(1), which requires district courts to dismiss malicious filings. Daker v. Ward, 999 F.3d 1300, 1307 (11th Cir. 2021). 

An action is malicious when a prisoner misrepresents his prior litigation history on a complaint form requiring disclosure of such history and signs the complaint under penalty of perjury. See Rivera v. 

Allin, 144 F.3d 719, 731 (11th Cir. 1998) (counting as a strike under 

§ 1915(g) an action that was dismissed for an abuse of the legal process because the inmate lied under penalty of perjury about a prior 

lawsuit), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199 

(2007).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing 

Allen’s complaint without prejudice because he failed to disclose 

all of his relevant prior litigation, and the court was within its 

USCA11 Case: 22-11946 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023 Page: 2 of 3
22-11946 Opinion of the Court 3

discretion to dismiss as malicious because of that failure. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the action without 

prejudice.

AFFIRMED.1

1 Additionally, Allen’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and his 

motion to consolidate the appeal with Case Number 22-13808 is DENIED as 

MOOT.

USCA11 Case: 22-11946 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023 Page: 3 of 3
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)**

**AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

**OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended

December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis E. Bunday, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ DENNIS E. BUNDAY

Dennis E. Bunday

Chief Financial Officer

Williams Controls, Inc.

February 13, 2006
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3027 Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. ( a ) *Identification.* Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is a device intended to be implanted that is made from methylmethacrylate, polymethylmethacrylate, esters of methacrylic acid, or copolymers containing polymethylmethacrylate and polystyrene. The device is intended for use in arthroplastic procedures of the hip, knee, and other joints for the fixation of polymer or metallic prosthetic implants to living bone.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement.”
[67 FR 46855, July 17, 2002]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
  FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND THE
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED 
  SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                   60,129 
<SECURITIES>                              7,000
<RECEIVABLES>                            71,842
<ALLOWANCES>                              7,371
<INVENTORY>                              56,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        207,895
<PP&E>                                  101,156
<DEPRECIATION>                           57,682 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          263,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    58,987
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     22
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                              201,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            263,619
<SALES>                                 277,023 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        277,023
<CGS>                                   199,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           199,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         10,938
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          16,668
<INCOME-TAX>                              6,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      10,668 
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             10,668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.48  
        

</TABLE>
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: May 5, 2014

S13Y1533. IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS RICHARD TOPMILLER.

PER CURIAM.

The Court having reviewed the Notice of Compliance with Conditions

submitted by the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia, and

it appearing that Thomas Richard Topmiller has complied with all of the

conditions for reinstatement following his suspension by this Court, see In the

Matter of Topmiller, 293 Ga. 667 (748 SE2d 919) (2013), it is hereby ordered

that Thomas Richard Topmiller be reinstated to the practice of law in the State

of Georgia.

Reinstated. All the Justices concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      28,226,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,221,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,898,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,447,703
<PP&E>                                      19,132,237
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,896,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,789,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,213,410
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,452
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,485,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,789,939
<SALES>                                      7,625,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,959,342
<CGS>                                        4,965,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,185,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,167,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (393,227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (394,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (394,483)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
*Note that agenda times are approximate. For further information, please contact the Designated Federal 

Officer for this meeting, Jim Downing via telephone: (202) 564-2468 or email: downing.jim@epa.gov

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

HUMAN STUDIES REVIEW BOARD (HSRB)

PUBLIC TELECONFERENCE/WEBINAR

MEETING AGENDA

Friday, April 12, 2013

11:00 am - 12:30 pm (Eastern Time)*

HSRB MEETING FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE

DRAFT JANUARY 17, 2013 HSRB MEETING FINAL REPORT

HSRB WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/

Docket Telephone: (202) 566 1752

Docket Number: EPA–HQ–ORD–2013-0115

Meeting location via telephone/Internet only

Dial in number 866-299-3188; conference code 2025647189

https://epa.connectsolutions.com/hsrbtele

11:00 AM Convene Meeting and Identification of Board Members – Jim Downing 

(Designated Federal Officer, EPA HSRB, OSA)

11:05 AM* Meeting Administrative Procedures – Jim Downing, DFO

11:10 AM Meeting Process – Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH (HSRB Chair)

11:15 AM Public Comments

11:20 AM Board Discussion and Decision on Final Report –Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH

(HSRB Chair)

The Board’s response to EPA charge questions presented at the January 17, 2013 meeting.

A completed study report from the Antimicrobial Exposure Assessment Task Force II 

(AEATF) in which the dermal and inhalation exposure of professional janitorial workers 

was monitored as they poured liquid antimicrobial pesticide products from conventional or 

reduced-splash containers into different sizes and types of receiving containers.

Charge to the Board - Science

 Was the research reported in the Antimicrobial Exposure Assessment Task Force II

(AEATF) completed liquid pour study report (AEA05) faithful to the design and 

objectives of the protocol and governing documents of AEATF?

 Has EPA adequately characterized, from a scientific perspective, the limitations on these 

data that should be considered when using the data in estimating the exposure of people 

who pour liquid antimicrobial pesticide products?

Lead Discussant: William Popendorf, Ph.D.

Associate Discussants: Jose Manautou, Ph.D.
*Note that agenda times are approximate. For further information, please contact the Designated Federal 

Officer for this meeting, Jim Downing via telephone: (202) 564-2468 or email: downing.jim@epa.gov

Charge to the Board - Ethics: 

 If the AHETF proposal is revised as suggested in EPA’s review and if the research is 

performed as described, is the research likely to meet the applicable requirements of 40 

CFR part 26, subparts K and L?

Lead Discussant: Virginia Ashby Sharpe, Ph.D.

Associate Discussant: Jewell Halanych, MD

12:25 PM* Summary and Next Steps – Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH (HSRB Chair) and Jim 

Downing (DFO)

12:30 PM* Adjournment
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 131 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 131

    To constitute the minority party's membership on certain of the 
standing committees for the One Hundred Third Congress, or until their 
                         successors are chosen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 1 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To constitute the minority party's membership on certain of the 
standing committees for the One Hundred Third Congress, or until their 
                         successors are chosen.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the minority party's 
membership on the following standing committees for the One Hundred 
Third Congress, or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Warner, Mr. Cohen, 
Mr. McCain, Mr. Lott, Mr. Coats, Mr. Smith, Mr. Kempthorne, Mr. 
Faircloth, and Mrs. Hutchison.
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Mr. Danforth, 
Mr. Packwood, Mr. Pressler, Mr. Stevens, Mr. McCain, Mr. Burns, Mr. 
Gorton, Mr. Lott, and Mrs. Hutchison.
    Committee on Foreign Relations: Mr. Helms, Mr. Lugar, Mrs. 
Kassebaum, Mr. Pressler, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Brown, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
Coverdell and Mr. Gregg.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Pressler, Mr. Wallop, Mr. Bond, 
Mr. Burns, Mr. Mack, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Kempthorne, Mr. Bennett, Mr. 
Chafee, and Mrs. Hutchison.

                                 <all>
```