alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>	EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS


I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.







Date:  May 17, 2004          /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman
			Jeffrey A. Rothman,
			President,
		Demeter Management Corporation,
		general partner of the registrant
Description of 2007 Annual Incentive Bonus Performance Measures


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    Description
      of 2007 Annual Incentive Bonus Performance Measures

    


    The
      2007 annual
      incentive bonuses for Messrs. Day, Gooch and Johnson will be based on the
      following performance measure established in accordance with the Compensation
      Plan and the Bonus Plan:

    


    	·  	
             
100%
              of the performance measure is based on achievement of RadioShack’s EBITDA
              target.

          


     

    Actual
      amounts
      payable, if any, can range from 25% to 150% (or, in the case of Mr. Day, 25%
      to
      200%) of the target amounts, depending on the extent to which performance under
      the foregoing criteria meets, exceeds or is below the
      target.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 112

Urging sanctions to be imposed against the Burmese government, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 24 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. SIMON, Mr. PELL, Mr. HELMS, Mr. BIDEN,

Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. D’AMATO, and Mr. KERREY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Urging sanctions to be imposed against the Burmese

government, and for other purposes.

Whereas the military junta in Burma known as the State

Law and Order Restoration Council (in this preamble referred to as the ‘‘SLORC’’) brutally suppressed peaceful

democratic demonstrations in September 1988;

Whereas the Senate of the United States has repeatedly condemned and continues its condemnation of the SLORC;

Whereas the SLORC does not represent the people of Burma,

since the people of Burma gave the National League for

Democracy a clear victory in the election of May 27,

1990;
2

•SRES 112 IS

Whereas the SLORC has held Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, a

leader of the National League for Democracy and the

winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for 1991, under house

arrest since July 1989;

Whereas the United Nations Human Rights Commission

unanimously adopted on March 5, 1993, a resolution deploring the human rights situation in Burma and the

continued arrest of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi; and

Whereas on March 12, 1992, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate unanimously stated that (1) the

SLORC does not represent the Burmese people and

should transfer power to the winners of the 1990 elections, (2) United States military attach ́es should be withdrawn from Burma, and (3) the United States should oppose United Nations Development Program funding for

Burma: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 President, the Secretary of State, and other United States

3 Government representatives should—

4 (1) seek the immediate release of Daw Aung

5 San Suu Kyi from arrest and the transfer of power

6 to the winners of the 1990 elections in Burma; and

7 (2) encourage the adoption by the United Na8 tions Security Council of an arms embargo and

9 other sanctions against the regime of the State Law

10 and Order Restoration Council in Burma.
3

•SRES 112 IS

1 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

2 a copy of this resolution to the President and the Sec3 retary of State.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2015-3 Owner Trust
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: MUFG Union Bank, N.A.



Date: June 15, 2017



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                       
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
|American Honda Finance Corporation                  
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00644-CV

HYBISCUS FOOD INC. and Sanjiv Chandan, Individually,

Appellants

v.

Atul SARASWAT,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CI-03159

Honorable Laura Salinas,1 Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. Costs of this appeal are taxed jointly and severally against Appellants Hybiscus 

Food Inc. and Sanjiv Chandan, individually. 

SIGNED November 6, 2013.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

1 The Honorable Martha Tanner presided at the trial and signed the final judgment.
§ 1.305-1 Stock dividends. ( a ) *In general.* Under section 305, a distribution made by a corporation to its shareholders in its stock or in rights to acquire its stock is not included in gross income except as provided in section 305(b) and the regulations promulgated under the authority of section 305(c). A distribution made by a corporation to its shareholders in its stock or rights to acquire its stock which would not otherwise be included in gross income by reason of section 305 shall not be so included merely because such distribution was made out of Treasury stock or consisted of rights to acquire Treasury stock. See section 307 for rules as to basis of stock and stock rights acquired in a distribution.
( b ) *Amount of distribution.* ( 1 ) In general, where a distribution of stock or rights to acquire stock of a corporation is treated as a distribution of property to which section 301 applies by reason of section 305(b), the amount of the distribution, in accordance with section 301(b) and § 1.301-1 , is the fair market value of such stock or rights on the date of distribution. See Example (1) of § 1.305-2(b).
( 2 ) Where a corporation which regularly distributes its earnings and profits, such as a regulated investment company, declares a dividend pursuant to which the shareholders may elect to receive either money or stock of the distributing corporation of equivalent value, the amount of the distribution of the stock received by any shareholder electing to receive stock will be considered to equal the amount of the money which could have been received instead. See Example (2) of § 1.305-2(b).
( 3 ) For rules for determining the amount of the distribution where certain transactions, such as changes in conversion ratios or periodic redemptions, are treated as distributions under section 305(c), see Examples (6), (8), (9), and (15) of § 1.305-3(e).
( c ) *Adjustment in purchase price.* A transfer of stock (or rights to acquire stock) or an increase or decrease in the conversion ratio or redemption price of stock which represents an adjustment of the price to be paid by the distributing corporation in acquiring property (within the meaning of section 317(a)) is not within the purview of section 305 because it is not a distribution with respect to its stock. For example, assume that on January 1, 1970, pursuant to a reorganization, corporation X acquires all the stock of corporation Y solely in exchange for its convertible preferred class B stock. Under the terms of the class B stock, its conversion ratio is to be adjusted in 1976 under a formula based upon the earnings of corporation Y over the 6-year period ending on December 31, 1975. Such an adjustment in 1976 is not covered by section 305.
( d ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) For purposes of this section and §§ 1.305-2 through 1.305-7, the term *stock* includes rights or warrants to acquire such stock.
( 2 ) For purposes of §§ 1.305-2 through 1.305-7, the term *shareholder* includes a holder of rights or warrants or a holder of convertible securities.
[T.D. 7281, 38 FR 18532, July 12, 1973; 38 FR 19910, July 25, 1973]
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.2160 Coagulase plasma. ( a ) *Identification.* Coagulase plasma is a device that consists of freeze-dried animal or human plasma that is intended for medical purposes to perform coagulase tests primarily on staphylococcal bacteria. When reconstituted, the fluid plasma is clotted by the action of the enzyme coagulase which is produced by pathogenic staphylococci. Test results are used primarily as an aid in the diagnosis of disease caused by pathogenic bacteria belonging to the genus *Staphylococcus* and provide epidemiological information on disease caused by these microorganisms.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 1119, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38790, July 25, 2001]
# C_2016222EN.01004904.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/49

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 May 2016 — Glowacz-De-Chevilly v Commission

(Case F-107/14) (1)

(2016/C 222/77)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12/1/2015, p. 53.

---
Exhibit 35.7



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015- C30
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of August 1, 2015 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending
December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and
of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers
knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2016



|                |  | 
|--------------- |  | 
|/s/ Brian Smith |  | 

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# C_2015398EN.01001102.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/11

---

Appeal brought on 29 December 2014 by AQ against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 December 2014 in Case T-168/11 AQ v European Parliament

(Case C-615/14 P)

(2015/C 398/14)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: AQ

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 17 September 2015, the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) ordered that the case be removed from the Register as being manifestly inadmissible.

---
§ 1.42-16 Eligible basis reduced by federal grants. ( a ) *In general.* If, during any taxable year of the compliance period (described in section 42(i)(1)), a grant is made with respect to any building or the operation thereof and any portion of the grant is funded with federal funds (whether or not includible in gross income), the eligible basis of the building for the taxable year and all succeeding taxable years is reduced by the portion of the grant that is so funded.
( b ) *Grants do not include certain rental assistance payments.* A federal rental assistance payment made to a building owner on behalf or in respect of a tenant is not a grant made with respect to a building or its operation if the payment is made pursuant to— ( 1 ) Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f)
( 2 ) A qualifying program of rental assistance administered under section 9 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437g); or
( 3 ) A program or method of rental assistance as the Secretary may designate by publication in the Federal Register or in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter).
( c ) *Qualifying rental assistance program.* For purposes of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, payments are made pursuant to a qualifying rental assistance program administered under section 9 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to the extent that the payments— ( 1 ) Are made to a building owner pursuant to a contract with a public housing authority with respect to units the owner has agreed to maintain as public housing units (PH-units) in the building;
( 2 ) Are made with respect to units occupied by public housing tenants, provided that, for this purpose, units may be considered occupied during periods of short term vacancy (not to exceed 60 days); and
( 3 ) Do not exceed the difference between the rents received from a building's PH-unit tenants and a pro rata portion of the building's actual operating costs that are reasonably allocable to the PH-units (based on square footage, number of bedrooms, or similar objective criteria), and provided that, for this purpose, operating costs do not include any development costs of a building (including developer's fees) or the principal or interest of any debt incurred with respect to any part of the building.
( d ) *Effective date.* This section is effective September 26, 1997.
[T.D. 8731, 62 FR 50503, Sept. 26, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,642]


Williams Controls, Inc., Portland, OR; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed on May 28, 
2009, on behalf of workers of Williams Controls, Inc., Portland, 
Oregon.
    The petition filed with the Department has been deemed invalid. A 
petition when filed by workers must be signed by three workers. This 
requirement was not met.
    Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of July 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18049 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go

to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 1 8

- BG

- 10 0 6

IN RE JOSEPH J

. PAPPACODA

201 8 D DN 172

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg istration No. 439225

BEFORE: Beckwith

, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Ferren , Senior Judge s

.

O R D E R

(FILED

– December 20, 2018)

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of Florida

revoking respondent ’s license to practice law in that jurisdiction by consent ; this

court’s October 1 , 201 8 , order suspending respondent and directing h im to show

cause why the functional ly equivalent reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not

be imposed; respondent’s response thereto; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel

regarding r eciprocal discipline ; and respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) affidavit

filed on October 30 , 2018

, it is

ORDERED that Joseph J. Pappacoda is hereby disbarred from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia

, nunc pro tunc to October 30 , 2018

. See In re Sibley

, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable

presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the

respondent does not participate) ; D.C. Bar R. XI, §1 6 ( c ) (providing the timing for

when a disbarred attorney may seek reinstatement).

PER CURIAM
DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION 

DOCKET OPERATIONS 

JOHN LAZAS 

MAYOR 

m OCT -U A S: 22 OFFIC E O F TIIE M A vo n 

156 S.BROADWAY, Sunn 230 I TUKLCXTK, CALIFOIU-IW 953S0 I PHONE 209-668-5540 I FAX 209-668-5668 

AUCUSI9, 2010 

Ray Lailood, Sccrctar)' of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Traiisportalion 

400 7"" Street, SW 

Wasliinglon, DC 20590 

Sobject: Small Communit>' Air Ser\ice Dcvelopnicnt Program 

Modesto Citj'-Countj' Airport, Modesto, C A 

Dear Mr. Secretary, 

1 am writing on behalf of the City of Turlock to share our strong support for the Modesto City-County Airport's 

current efforts to acquire grant fiinds through the Federal Department of Transportation's Small Community Air 

Service Program (SCASDP). These funds will be used to improve air ser\'ice to our community, which is critical to 

the economic development in our area. The SCASDP grant will be used to help fund establishing direct daily 

passenger air service between Modesto and Portland or Seattle, in addition to the existing service to San Francisco. 

Conunercial air scr\'icc at Modesto City-County Airport plays an important role in providing support to business, 

goveninient, education, and leisure travel lo and from the area. Future growth of tlie Modesto community depends, 

in pan, on the airport's ability to meet the needs of existing local businesses, as well as companies considering 

Modesto as a loailion for their operations. Direct daily passenger service between Modesto and a stxond airline 

hub will lay the groundwork for providing for air transportation for both current and future needs in this region. 

I am confident you will agree that an investment in tliis project will prox-ide great benefits for Modc:>tu and the 

entire Central Valley served by Modesto City-County Airport. This is a project that has strong community support, 

and with your help, can proWdc substantial benefits lo the community. For these reasons. I rcspcctfiilly request tliat 

the Modesto City-County Airport be strongly con.sidercd as a worthy recipient of the Small Corrununity Air Service 

Development Program giant. 

Sincere] 

Modesto City-County Airport - Smoll Community Air Service Development Grant - August 2010 52