alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8108 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8108

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to add a Medicaid State 
  plan requirement with respect to the determination of residency of 
            certain individuals serving in the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2024

 Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia (for herself and Ms. Kaptur) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to add a Medicaid State 
  plan requirement with respect to the determination of residency of 
            certain individuals serving in the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICAID STATE PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR DETERMINING RESIDENCY OF 
              MILITARY FAMILIES.

    Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (86), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (87), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (87) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(88) beginning January 1, 2028, provide that in 
        determining eligibility for medical assistance under the State 
        plan (or waiver of such plan) for an individual (or dependent 
        of such individual) who is a member of the Armed Forces serving 
        on active duty and is, by reason of such service, temporarily 
        relocated to a State other than such State, if such individual 
        (or dependent) remains a legal resident of such State and was, 
        at the time of the relocation, receiving home and community-
        based services described in section 9817(a)(2)(B) of the 
        American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, the State shall deem such 
        individual (or dependent) to be a resident of such State for 
        purposes of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8028 

To reauthorize the Second Chance Act of 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2024 

Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia (for herself, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. MOORE

of Alabama, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. NADLER, Mr. TURNER, and Mr. LAHOOD) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Second Chance Act of 2007. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Chance Reau5 thorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING PROGRAMS. 

7 (a) STATE AND LOCAL REENTRY DEMONSTRATION

8 PROJECTS.—Section 2976 of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

9 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10631) 

10 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8028 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

3 the end; 

4 (B) in paragraph (8), by striking the pe5 riod at the end; and 

6 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(9) treating substance use disorders, including 

8 by providing peer recovery services, case manage9 ment, and access to overdose education and overdose 

10 reversal medications; and 

11 ‘‘(10) providing reentry housing services.’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (o)(1), by striking ‘‘2019 

13 through 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 

14 (b) GRANTS FOR FAMILY-BASED SUBSTANCE ABUSE

15 TREATMENT.—Section 2926(a) of the Omnibus Crime 

16 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

17 10595a(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2019 through 2023’’ 

18 and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 

19 (c) GRANT PROGRAM TO EVALUATE AND IMPROVE

20 EDUCATIONAL METHODS AT PRISONS, JAILS, AND JUVE21 NILE FACILITIES.—Section 1001(28) of the Omnibus 

22 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

23 10261(28)) is amended by striking ‘‘2019, 2020, 2021, 

24 2022, and 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8028 IH

1 (d) CAREERS TRAINING DEMONSTRATION

2 GRANTS.—Section 115(f) of the Second Chance Act of 

3 2007 (34 U.S.C. 60511(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘2019, 

4 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 

5 through 2029’’. 

6 (e) OFFENDER REENTRY SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND

7 CRIMINAL JUSTICE COLLABORATION PROGRAM.—Section 

8 201(f)(1) of the Second Chance Act of 2007 (34 U.S.C. 

9 60521(f)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘2019 through 2023’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 

11 (f) COMMUNITY-BASED MENTORING AND TRANSI12 TIONAL SERVICE GRANTS TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZA13 TIONS.—Section 211(f) of the Second Chance Act of 2007 

14 (34 U.S.C. 60531(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘2019 

15 through 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Southern *et al. v.*Morris *et al.*

No. 8763.

March 18, 1932.

*H. B. Moss,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Fred Morris, F. T. Wills, L. M. Blair,*and *Boberts & Yandiviere,*contra.

Gilbert, J.

The suit was for injunction, cancellation, and a money judg-

ment. A verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The exception is to be the judgment refusing a new trial. The motion consisted of the usual general grounds. *Held,*that the verdict is supported by evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 04 11 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RYAN SCOTT BROADBROOKS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 1 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 25 2021

03/25/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0411
Internet Archive's Wayback Machine

Loading...

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040050627.pdf | 8:41:08 Feb 18, 2017

Got an HTTP 302 response at crawl time

Redirecting to...

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040050627.pdf

Impatient?

					Home				 |									Help
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Neenah Enterprises, Inc.pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer,and Corporate Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Neenah Enterprises, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.DATE: February 14, 2008         /s/ Robert E. Ostendorf, Jr.   Robert E. Ostendorf, Jr.   President and Chief Executive Officer       /s/ Gary W. LaChey   Gary W. LaChey   Corporate Vice President — Financeand Chief Financial Officer  
36
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

137378 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r & (25) Marilyn Kell y (30 ) Maura D. Corriga n (31) Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices
DAVID McMILLIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137378 COA: 286371 Wayne CC: 03-325112-CZ DTE ENERGY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the August 15, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motio n for stay is DENIED.

l1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
#### COOS (OR KOWES) BAY, LOWER UMPQUA (OR KALAWATSET), AND SIUSLAW INDIAN TRIBES v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. K-345]

[87 C. Cls. 143; 306 U. S. 653]

Petition dismissed May 2, 1938.

Petition for writ of certiorari *denied*by the Supreme Court March 27, 1939.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTOPER DAVID RYAN,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-14-00167-CR

Appeal from the

112th District Court

of Upton County, Texas

(TC# 05-05-U790-DPO)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2015-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

March 29, 2016

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis                                                   |
|   | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0164 Directorate Identifier: 2013-NE-10-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Austro waste gate 

ctrl diesel 0.5 $ 42.50 $231 $ 273.50 128 $35,008.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $35,008

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): ASE Estimate
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
427 A.2d 1217

#### Industrial Valley Bank, Appellant v. Motorola Communication.

Argued June 27, 1979.

Kenneth F. Carobus, for appellant;

William B. Carr, Jr., for appellee.

Before WIEAND, ROBINSON and LOUIK, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation. President Judge Otto P. Robinson of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania, and Judge Maurice Louik of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania are sitting by designation.

This decision was reached following the death of Robinson, J.

Order affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


National Sea Grant Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the Sea Grant Advisory Board (Board). Board 
members will discuss and provide advice on the National Sea Grant 
College Program in the areas of program evaluation, strategic planning, 
education and extension, science and technology programs, and other 
matters as described in the Agenda below.

DATES: The announced meeting is scheduled for Wednesday August, 26-
Friday August 28, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mayflower Park Hotel, 405 
Olive Way, Seattle, WA 98101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Melissa Pearson, National Sea 
Grant College Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 
1315 East-West Highway, Room 11704, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, 301-
734-1083.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board, which consists of a balanced 
representation from academia, industry, state government and citizens 
groups, was established by Section 209 of the Sea Grant Program 
Improvement Act of 1976 (Pub. L. 94-461, 33 U.S.C. 1128). The duties of 
the Board were amended by the National Sea Grant College Program 
Amendments Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-394). The Board advises the 
Secretary of Commerce and the Director of the National Sea Grant 
College Program with respect to operations under the Act, and such 
other matters as the Secretary refers to them for review and advice.
    The Agenda for the meeting can be found at: http://
www:seagrant.noaa.gov/leadership/advisoryboard/agenda 0809.pdf.

    Dated: July 24, 2009.
Mark E. Brown,
Chief Financial Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-18234 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KA-P
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 257

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the appropriate portrayal of

men and women of the Armed Forces in the upcoming National Air

and Space Museum’s exhibit on the Enola Gay.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 19 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Mrs. KASSEBAUM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Rules and Administration

SEPTEMBER 23 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the Senate regarding the appropriate

portrayal of men and women of the Armed Forces in

the upcoming National Air and Space Museum’s exhibit

on the Enola Gay.

Whereas the role of the Enola Gay during World War II was

momentous in helping to bring World War II to a merciful end, which resulted in saving the lives of Americans

and Japanese;

Whereas the current script for the National Air and Space

Museum’s exhibit on the Enola Gay is revisionist and offensive to many World War II veterans;
2

•SRES 257 ATS

Whereas the Federal law states that ‘‘the Smithsonian Institute shall commemorate and display the contributions

made by the military forces of the Nation toward creating, developing, and maintaining a free, peaceful, and

independent society and culture in the United States’’;

Whereas the Federal law also states that ‘‘the valor and sacrificial service of the men and women of the Armed

Forces shall be portrayed as an inspiration to the present

and future generations of America’’; and

Whereas, in memorializing the role of the United States in

armed conflict, the National Air and Space Museum has

an obligation under the Federal law to portray history in

the proper context of the times: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any

2 exhibit displayed by the National Air and Space Museum

3 with respect to the Enola Gay should reflect appropriate

4 sensitivity toward the men and women who faithfully and

5 selflessly served the United States during World War II

6 and should avoid impugning the memory of those who

7 gave their lives for freedom.

Æ
Exhibit 35.15

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Trust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2015 , (the Agreement), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as
depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as servicer and special servicer, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the Certificate Administrator), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
trustee, the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending
December 31, 2015 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on
such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 26, 2016



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director


CGCMT 2015-SMRT
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 12062 and # 12063]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1880-DR), dated 03/02/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storms. *Incident Period:*
                         01/19/2010 through 01/26/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         03/02/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/03/2010 *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/02/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite  6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/02/2010, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Adair, Audubon, Calhoun, Carroll, Cass, Crawford, Guthrie, Harrison, Madison, Pottawattamie, Sac, Shelby. The interest rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12062B and for economic injury is 12063B. 
 
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2010-5256 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P