alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 802 

To amend the CARES Act to remove a requirement on lessors to provide 

notice to vacate, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mr. LOUDERMILK (for himself, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. BARR, Mr. TIMMONS, 

Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. FLOOD, and Mr. NORMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the CARES Act to remove a requirement on 

lessors to provide notice to vacate, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respect State Housing 

5 Laws Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NOTICE. 

7 Section 4024 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9058) 

8 is amended by striking subsection (c). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
1 The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1003

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Chad Orville Felderman, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 10, 2003 Filed: July 2, 2003

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD and RILEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, 1 District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM Chad Felderman appeals from his sentence following his conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine while on pretrial release. See 21U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); 18 U.S.C. § 3147(1).2 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2- Mr. Felderman asserts that the district court 2was unaware of its authority to depart downward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3, p.s., and thus committed error when it refused to do so. See United States v. Lewis , 249 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 2001). We disagree. Mr. Felderman's counsel alerted the district court to the relevant guideline section both in a pre-sentence brief and at the sentencing hearing itself. In these circumstances, we will not presume that the district court was unaware of its authority simply because it omitted to make a formal recital of its power to depart if the defendant's criminal history points significantly overstated his actual criminal history. Cf. United States v. Chase , 174 F.3d 1193, 1195 (11th Cir. 1999). We also reject Mr. Felderman's contention that the district court erred because it did not sufficiently state its reasons for choosing the sentence that it imposed. We agree with Mr. Felderman that where, as here, the guidelines fix a sentencing range that spans more than twenty-four months, a sentencing court is obliged to state "the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence." 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). But here the district court had read the pre-sentence report and letters that the defendant submitted, had heard argument from counsel, and had listened to Mr. Felderman's allocution; and when the court pronounced sentence it specifically said that it had chosen the sentence "after taking into account ... all the facts and circumstances surrounding this case, the offense, and [the defendant's] personal history and characteristics." The court, moreover, stated that it was imposing the sentence "to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct and to protect the public." We think that these pronouncements rather clearly satisfy the requirements of the applicable statute. Indeed, the court specifically adverted to matters mentioned as relevant in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B)&(C).

Affirmed.-3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.1500 Gingival fluid measurer. ( a ) *Identification.* A gingival fluid measurer is a gauge device intended to measure the amount of fluid in the gingival sulcus (depression between the tooth and gums) to determine if there is a gingivitis condition.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 63007, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38797, July 25, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 136 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 136

``To refer S. 1325 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Horace Martin'', 
 to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for a 
                           report thereon.''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 30 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

Mr. Thurmond submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

           September 28 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Reported by Mr. Biden, with an amendment and an amendment to the title
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                              in Italic.]

            October 4 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                   Considered, amended, and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
``To refer S. 1325 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Horace Martin'', 
 to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for a 
                           report thereon.''.

    Resolved, That the bill (S. 1325) entitled ``A bill for the relief 
of Horace Martin'', now pending in the Senate, together with all 
accompanying papers, is referred to the Chief Judge of the United 
States Claims Court. The Chief Judge shall proceed with the same in 
accordance with the provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, 
United States Code, and report back to the Senate, at the earliest 
practicable date, giving such finding of fact and conclusions that are 
sufficient to inform Congress of the amount, if any, legally or 
equitably due from the United States to the claimant.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.4


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated January 31, 2002 on the consolidated financial
statements of rStar Corporation included in the Annual Report of Gilat Satellite
Networks, Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-08826,
333-10092, 333-12466, and 333-12988), Form F-3 (No. 333-12698), and Form F-4
(No. 333-71422)



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


San Francisco, California
April 15, 2003
FILED

March 20, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

JOHN JAY HOOKER, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

)

VS. ) Davidson Chancery

) No. 96-3601-II

SEN. FRED D. THOMPSON, )

)

Defendant/Appellee, )

) Consolidated

and ) Appeal No.

) 01-A-01-9709-CH-00533

JOHN JAY HOOKER, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

) Davidson Chancery

VS. ) No. 96-2847-III

)

DON SUNDQUIST, ET AL., )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

The appellant has filed a respectful petition to rehear, which we have

considered and found to be without merit.

It is, therefore, ordered that the petition be and hereby is overruled.

_________________________________

HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE

MIDDLE SECTION

_________________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

_________________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 293 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 293

      To commend the exemplary leadership of the majority leader.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 1 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

 Mr. Dole submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      To commend the exemplary leadership of the majority leader.

    Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby tendered to the 
distinguished majority leader, the Senator from Maine, the Honorable 
George J. Mitchell, for his exemplary leadership and the cooperative 
and dedicated manner in which he has performed his leadership 
responsibilities in the conduct of Senate business during the second 
session of the One Hundred Third Congress.
                                 <all>
```
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2015-CCRE27Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer, BerkeleyPoint Capital LLC, as Primary Servicer, KeyBank National Association, asPrimary Servicer for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, KeyBank NationalAssociation, as Special Servicer for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan,Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee for the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, and Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian for the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: October 30,2019

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 10.1 - Description of Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan of Berry Petroleum
      Company


     

    
      

      

    

    Exhibit
      10.1


    
      

        DESCRIPTION
          OF THE SHORT-TERM CASH INCENTIVE PLAN (BONUS)

        


        Annual
          cash incentive awards, which are designed to provide short-term performance
          incentives, are made to employees to recognize and reward corporate and
          individual performance. The plan in effect provides an annual incentive
          fund of
          up to 3.75% of the Company's annual net income, with certain adjustments,
          to
          potentially any and all employees upon achievement of the Company’s growth and
          profitability goals.

        


        Annually,
          Management and the Board will set specific targets to be achieved which
          will
          determine the cash payment as a whole and then to each eligible employee
          based
          on a formula. Executive Officers have performance metrics established for
          each
          of the following: net income, production, operating expenditures, proved
          reserves, and finding and development costs, all modified by environmental
          health and safety (“EHS”) performance. All other employees have performance
          metrics for production and EHS. The Board retains the flexibility to adjust
          various items to assure compliance with the intent of the cash incentive
          awards.
          All annual cash bonuses for executive officers are approved by the Compensation
          Committee and the Board of Directors. 

      

    

     

     

    1
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34

                                  AMENDMENT ONE
               WEST CORPORATION EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

         WHEREAS, West Corporation (the "Company") adopted the West Corporation
Executive Retirement Savings Plan (the "Plan") effective as of January 1, 2000;
and

         WHEREAS, the Plan was most recently amended and restated in its
entirety effective as of January 1, 2005 (the "2005 Restatement") to comply with
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; and

         WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the 2005 Restatement to
include certain vesting provisions that were included in the original Plan
document but were inadvertently omitted from the 2005 Restatement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 2005, Section 7.1 of the
2005 Restatement is clarified and amended by adding the following to the end of
said Section:

               "A Participant's years of vesting service shall be equal to his
               years of vesting service credited under the Company's 401(k)
               savings plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Participant
               shall be fully (100%) vested in his entire Account upon (i)
               termination of employment on or after attaining age 65; (ii)
               termination of employment due to permanent disability as defined
               under the Company's 401(k) savings plan; or (iii) upon a change
               of control of the Company. A "change of control" means (a) any
               reorganization, merger or consolidation to which the Company is a
               party and as a result of which the stockholders of the Company
               immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation
               do not, immediately thereafter, own more than 50% of the combined
               voting power of the shares entitled to vote in the election of
               the directors of the surviving corporation; or (b) the approval
               by the stockholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or
               dissolution of the Company or a sale of all or substantially all
               of the assets of the Company."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment One is executed this 7th day of
April, 2006, but effective as of January 1, 2005.

                                             WEST CORPORATION


                                             By:    /s/ Paul M. Mendlik
                                                    ----------------------------
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer


                                       1
§ 1.672(a)-1 Definition of adverse party. ( a ) Under section 672(a) an adverse party is defined as any person having a substantial beneficial interest in a trust which would be adversely affected by the exercise or nonexercise of a power which he possesses respecting the trust. A trustee is not an adverse party merely because of his interest as trustee. A person having a general power of appointment over the trust property is deemed to have a beneficial interest in the trust. An interest is a substantial interest if its value in relation to the total value of the property subject to the power is not insignificant.
( b ) Ordinarily, a beneficiary will be an adverse party, but if his right to share in the income or corpus of a trust is limited to only a part, he may be an adverse party only as to that part. Thus, if A, B, C, and D are equal income beneficiaries of a trust and the grantor can revoke with A's consent, the grantor is treated as the owner of a portion which represents three-fourths of the trust; and items of income, deduction, and credit attributable to that portion are included in determining the tax of the grantor.
( c ) The interest of an ordinary income beneficiary of a trust may or may not be adverse with respect to the exercise of a power over corpus. Thus, if the income of a trust is payable to A for life, with a power (which is not a general power of appointment) in A to appoint the corpus to the grantor either during his life or by will, A's interest is adverse to the return of the corpus to the grantor during A's life, but is not adverse to a return of the corpus after A's death. In other words, A's interest is adverse as to ordinary income but is not adverse as to income allocable to corpus. Therefore, assuming no other relevant facts exist, the grantor would not be taxable on the ordinary income of the trust under section 674, 676, or 677, but would be taxable under section 677 on income allocable to corpus (such as capital gains), since it may in the discretion of a nonadverse party be accumulated for future distribution to the grantor. Similarly, the interest of a contingent income beneficiary is adverse to a return of corpus to the grantor before the termination of his interest but not to a return of corpus after the termination of his interest.
( d ) The interest of a remainderman is adverse to the exercise of any power over the corpus of a trust, but not to the exercise of a power over any income interest preceding his remainder. For example, if the grantor creates a trust which provides for income to be distributed to A for 10 years and then for the corpus to go to X if he is then living, a power exercisable by X to revest corpus in the grantor is a power exercisable by an adverse party; however, a power exercisable by X to distribute part or all of the ordinary income to the grantor may be a power exercisable by a nonadverse party (which would cause the ordinary income to be taxed to the grantor).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March  

6, 2020

Order 

Clerk

March 6, 2020

160813(83)(84)

GRANT BAUSERMAN, KARL WILLIAMS and

TEDDY BROE, on Behalf of Themselves and All

Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

SC: 160813

v COA: 333181

Ct of Claims: 15-000202-MM

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of (1) the Center for Civil Justice, 

the Arc of Michigan, Detroit Eviction Defense, Michigan Legal Services, and United 

Community Housing Coalition, and (2) the Michigan League for Public Policy to file briefs 

amicus curiae are GRANTED. The amicus briefs submitted by those groups on March 5, 

2020, are accepted for filing.
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 109

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain committees for

the One Hundred Third Congress, or until their successors are chosen.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 19 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain

committees for the One Hundred Third Congress, or

until their successors are chosen.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the mi2 nority party’s membership on the following committee for

3 the remainder of the One Hundred Third Congress, or

4 until their successors are chosen:

5 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS: Mr. McConnell,

6 Mr. Smith, and Mr. Craig.

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApproximation of Engine Casing Temperature Constraints for Casing Mounted ElectronicsThe performance of propulsion engine systems is sensitive to weight and volume considerations. This can severely constrain the configuration and complexity of the control system hardware. Distributed Engine Control technology is a response to these concerns by providing more flexibility in designing the control system, and by extension, more functionality leading to higher performing engine systems. Consequently, there can be a weight benefit to mounting modular electronic hardware on the engine core casing in a high temperature environment. This paper attempts to quantify the in-flight temperature constraints for engine casing mounted electronics. In addition, an attempt is made at studying heat soak back effects. The Commercial Modular Aero Propulsion System Simulation 40k (C-MAPSS40k) software is leveraged with real flight data as the inputs to the simulation. A two-dimensional (2-D) heat transfer model is integrated with the engine simulation to approximate the temperature along the length of the engine casing. This modification to the existing C-MAPSS40k software will provide tools and methodologies to develop a better understanding of the requirements for the embedded electronics hardware in future engine systems. Results of the simulations are presented and their implications on temperature constraints for engine casing mounted electronics is discussed.Document ID20170004365Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKratz, Jonathan L.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Culley, Dennis E.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Chapman, Jeffryes W.*(Vantage Partners, LLC Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 4, 2017Publication DateApril 1, 2017Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerStatistics And ProbabilityMetals And Metallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN39546AIAA Paper 2016-4858E-19349NASA/TM-2017-219477Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.11CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsEngineThermal AnalysisControlsAvailable DownloadsNameType20170004365.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170000883See AlsoApproximation of Engine Casing Temperature Constraints for Casing Mounted Electronicsvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024