alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.529A-8 Applicability dates and transition relief. ( a ) *Applicability dates.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, §§ 1.529A-1 through 1.529A-4 apply for calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2021, §§ 1.529A-5 and 1.529A-6 apply to information returns required to be filed, and payee statements required to be furnished, after December 31, 2020, and § 1.529A-7 applies to statements required to be furnished after December 31, 2020.
( b ) *Transition relief* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Any program purporting to be a qualified ABLE program will not be disqualified during the transition period set forth in paragraph (b)(2) of this section (transition period) solely because of noncompliance with one or more provisions of §§ 1.529A-1 through 1.529A-7, provided that the program is established and operated in accordance with a reasonable, good faith interpretation of section 529A. Similarly, no ABLE account established and maintained under a program that meets the requirements of this paragraph will fail to qualify as an ABLE account during the transition period. However, to be a qualified ABLE program and an ABLE account under such a program after the transition period, the program and each account established and maintained under the program must be in compliance with §§ 1.529A-1 through 1.529A-7 by the end of the transition period. In no event, however, will a complete failure to file and furnish reports, information returns and payee statements required under section 529A(d)(1) for any accounts established and maintained under the program (including for calendar years beginning prior to January 1, 2021), be deemed to be due to reasonable cause for purposes of avoiding penalties imposed under section 6693.
( 2 ) *Transition period.* For purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the transition period begins with the establishment of the program purporting to be a qualified ABLE program and continues through the later of— ( i ) November 21, 2022; or
( ii ) The day immediately preceding the first day of the qualified ABLE program's first taxable year beginning after the close of the first regular session of the State legislature that begins after November 19, 2020. If a State has a two-year legislative session, each calendar year of such session will be deemed to be a separate regular session of the State legislature for purposes of this paragraph.
( 3 ) *Compliance after transition period.* After the transition period, a program and an account established and maintained under that program must be in compliance with §§ 1.529A-1 through 1.529A-7.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EDGAR MARTINEZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 121 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Martin, Michael (OST)

From:

Sent:

To:

Martin, Michael (OST)

,!\: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:56 AM

bobh@flyyra.com; nwangler@forecast-inc.com; Nancy Tia Brown

i-'~ l, c (mayornancy@cityofcody.com)

i' .: Brad Rawson; Kloosterman, John Oohn.kloosterman@united.com)

Airline proposals to provide EASat Cody, WY

SkyWest COD EASbid Nov 2013 - COD-SLC only.pdf; United COD EASbid Nov 2013 -

COD-DEN only.pdf

,:...,;

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Everyone:

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Cody, and give you an opportunity to offer any

comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International

Affairs. On October 29,2013, we issued Order 2013-10-15 (a) prohibiting SkyWest/United Express from terminating its

unsubsidized service in the Cody-Denver market and (b) requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing yearround EASfor a new term, with or without subsidy. In response to our request, SkyWest/Delta Connection submitted a

proposal to serve Cody-Salt Lake City, and SkyWest/United Express submitted a proposal to serve Cody-Denver.

I have attached both proposals for your review and they will be available on www.regulations.gov under the Docket

number DOT-OST-2011-0121. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon

as possible, but no later than Friday, December 20. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at

michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Have a safe and happy Thanksgiving.

Regards,

Michael Martin

United States Department of Transportation

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP)

(202) 366-6494

1
§ 1.265-3 Nondeductibility of interest relating to exempt-interest dividends. ( a ) *In general.* No deduction is allowed to a shareholder of a regulated investment company for interest on indebtedness that relates to exempt-interest dividends distributed by the company to the shareholder during the shareholder's taxable year.
( b ) *Interest relating to exempt-interest dividends.* ( 1 ) All or a portion of the interest on an indebtedness relates to exempt-interest dividends if the indebtedness is either incurred or continued to purchase or carry shares of stock of a regulated investment company that distributes exempt-interest dividends (as defined in section 852(b)(5) of the Code) to the holder of the shares during the shareholder's taxable year.
( 2 ) To determine the amount of interest that relates to the exempt-interest dividends the total amount of interest paid or accrued on the indebtedness is multiplied by a fraction. The numerator of the fraction is the amount of exempt-interest dividends received by the shareholder. The denominator of the fraction is the sum of the exempt-interest dividends and taxable dividends received by the shareholder (excluding capital gain dividends received by the shareholder and capital gains required to be included in the shareholder's computation of long-term capital gains under section 852(b)(3)(D)).
[T.D. 7601, 44 FR 16013, Mar. 16, 1979]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1414

DORA L. ADKINS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MERRIFIELD HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LP , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga, Senior District Judge. ( 1:22

- cv - 00399

- AJT

- IDD )

Submitted : July 2 6 , 2022 Decided: July 28, 2022

Before MOTZ, KING , and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Dora L. Adkins , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1414 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Dora L. Adkins appeals the district court’s orders denying her requests for leave to
file an emergency complaint and an amended emergency complaint . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Adkins v. Merrifield Hotel A ssocs., LP , No. 1:22

- cv - 00399

- AJT

- IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 12 & 13, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1414 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
SERVED: JANUARY 6, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF

WINGS AIR, LLC. FAADOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA- 2013-0849

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012EA110052) has been aSsigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

### ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W
.. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001
Wings Air, LLC, Respondent Javier Diaz, Agent for Service 18 Hanger Road, Suite 200, Hanger T White Plains, NY 10604 TEL:: 914-287-6450 FAJ(: 914-274-9855 Jared M. Allen, Respondent's Counsel The Aviation Law Finn i One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 TEL: 301-294-8550 FAJ(: 301-294-2525 

### ONE COPY

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, EasternRegion Federal Aviation Administration 1 AviationPlaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAJ(: 718-995-5699 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAJ(: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0849 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington,. DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 15, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00257

- CR

Sabien Armonte Taplin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN , BA KER, AND KELLY MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN ;

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds th at there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal

. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to reflect that Taplin pleaded “ T rue ” to

the State ’ s enhancemen t paragraph and that t he jury ’ s finding on the enhancement paragraph was

“ True

. ” The judgment, as modified , is affirmed

. Beca use appellant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 65 (Thursday, April 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 20318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07754]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-07]

Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Date: April 10, 2013.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

    March 13, 2013 minutes--Open Session.
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

California Compliance Review
Illinois Compliance Review
Revised ASC Policy Statements

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
meetings@asc.gov. You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, 
fax or commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H 
Street NW., Ste. 760, Washington, DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-
4101. Your request must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the 
Monday prior to the meeting. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security 
measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any 
video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any 
other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is 
prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: March 29, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-07754 Filed 4-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4400]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 30, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on November 6, 2009, (74 FR 57522), ISP Freetown Fine 
Chemicals, 238 South Main Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine (7396)..............................          I
Amphetamine (1100)...........................................         II
Methylphenidate (1724).......................................         II
Phenylacetone (8501).........................................         II
Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms) (9273)...........         II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture bulk API, for distribution to its 
customers. The bulk 2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine will be used for 
conversion into non-controlled substances.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 USC 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals to ensure that 
the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 USC 823, and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: February 25, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-4400 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 128497 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128497 COA: 258639 Kalamazoo CC: 03-001148-FH TERRY DEWAYNE WETHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Cour t, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

l1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 134 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 134

 Urging the Government of Kuwait to compensate United States citizens 
 and their families for financial losses incurred as a result of their 
            evacuation during the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 23 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

 Mrs. Feinstein submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
        to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Urging the Government of Kuwait to compensate United States citizens 
 and their families for financial losses incurred as a result of their 
            evacuation during the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.

Whereas during the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, the United States 
        Government evacuated numerous families within a 48-hour period;
Whereas many of these families consisted of one or more American citizens and 
        their immediate relatives;
Whereas the urgent nature of the evacuation process forced these families to 
        leave personal property and assets in Kuwait;
Whereas since the liberation of Kuwait, the Government of Kuwait has not 
        permitted these families to return to Kuwait to settle their financial 
        accounts;
Whereas many of these families have not been compensated for contractual and 
        business obligations that existed before the invasion of Kuwait;
Whereas the Government of Kuwait has acknowledged that it is ``well aware of the 
        indispensable contributions made by many of the foreign workers who 
        resided in Kuwait before August 2, 1990''; and
Whereas these families are at present residing in several States throughout the 
        United States and are being supported through public assistance programs 
        and loans from the United States Government: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the President 
should encourage the Government of Kuwait to compensate the American 
citizens and their families which were evacuated from Kuwait during the 
Iraqi invasion of August 1990, in accordance with the applicable 
contractual, business, and financial obligations of the Government of 
Kuwait or of its citizens, as the case may be.

                                 <all>
```
§ 1.1288-1 Adjustment of applicable Federal rate for tax-exempt obligations. ( a ) *In general.* In applying section 483 or section 1274 to a tax-exempt obligation, the applicable Federal rate is adjusted to take into account the tax exemption for interest on the obligation. For each applicable Federal rate determined under section 1274(d), the Secretary computes a corresponding adjusted applicable Federal rate by multiplying the applicable Federal rate by the adjustment factor described in paragraph (b) of this section. The Internal Revenue Service publishes the applicable Federal rates and the adjusted applicable Federal rates for each month in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii) of this chapter).
( b ) *Adjustment factor.* The adjustment factor is a percentage equal to— ( 1 ) The excess of 100 percent, over
( 2 ) The product of— ( i ) 59 percent, and
( ii ) The sum of the maximum rate in effect under section 1 applicable to individuals and the maximum rate in effect under section 1411 applicable to individuals for the month to which the adjusted applicable Federal rate applies.
( c ) *Effective/applicability date.* The rules of this section apply to the determination of adjusted applicable Federal rates beginning with the rates determined during August 2016 that apply during September 2016.
[T.D. 9763, 81 FR 24484, Apr. 26, 2016]
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R OB E R T MI C HA E L J OH NS ON , P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. TO M L. CA REY a n dBI LL LO CK Y ER, R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 06- 56738 D. C. No . CV- 0 5 - 0 2 0 1 2 - J TM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J e f f r e yT . M i l l e r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , L E A V Y , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one rR obe rtM i c ha e l J ohns on appe a l s pr o s e f r om the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d e n y in g h is 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab e a s p e titio n . W e d i sm i ss. 

# FI LED MA R 10 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS06- 56738 2 J ohns on c ont e nds tha tthe B oar d’ s 2003 de c i s i on t o de nyhi m par ol e w a s not supp ort ed by “ som e e vi dence” and there fore vi ol at ed hi s due proces s r i gh t s. A ft er br i e f i ng w a s c om pl e t e d i n thi s c a s e , thi s c ourthe l d tha tac e rt i f i c a t e of ap p e a lab ility( “C O A ” ) is r e q u ir e dto c h a lle n g e th e d e n ia l o f p ar o le . See H

a yw a rd v . M a rs h a ll , 6 0 3 F. 3 d5 4 6 , 5 5 4 - 5 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 0 ) ( e n b an c ) . N o w th e Sup r e me C o u rt h a s h e ldth a t th e o n lyf e d e r a l r ig h t a t is s u e in th e p ar o le c o n te x t is pr oc e dur a l , a nd the onl ypr ope ri nqui ryi s w ha tpr oc e s s the i nm a t e r e c e i ve d, not w h e th e rth e s ta te c o u rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 131 S . C t. 8 5 9 , 8 6 2 - 6 3 ( 2 0 1 1 ) . B e c au s e J o h n s o n r a is e s n o p r o c e du r a l c h a lle n g e s , a C O A c a n n o t is s u e , a n dw e d is m is s th e ap p e a l f o rla c ko f

ju r is d ic tio n . See 28 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) . D I SM I SSED .
From: "Palin, Bruce" <BPALIN@idem.IN.gov> 

To: Nuria Muniz/R5/USEPA/US@EPA,

Cc: "EASTERLY, THOMAS" <TEASTERL@idem.IN.gov>, "OERTEL, BRUCE" 

<BOERTEL@idem.IN.gov>, "Dorsey, Peggy" <PDorsey@idem.IN.gov>, "OSBORN,

REX" <ROSBORN@idem.IN.gov> 

Date: 02/05/2013 02:34 PM

Subject: Continued Support for Proposed Superfund sites 

Ms. Muniz,

The previous support letters sent by IDEM’s Commissioner Easterly for the

Garden City, Beck’s Lake and Keystone sites to be put on the National

Priorities List, was provided under the authority that had been delegated

from the Governor’s office to Commissioner Easterly. As you are probably

aware Governor Pence has selected Mr. Easterly to continue in his

position as Commissioner of IDEM. I have conferred with Commissioner 

Easterly and he continues to support the listing of all three sites on

the NPL. 

I hope that this provides the assurance you need and if you have any

questions please feel free to contact me or my staff. 

Bruce H Palin 

Assistant Commissioner 

Office of Land Quality

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

317/233-6591