alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014351EN.01001401.xml

| 6.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/14

---

Action brought on 18 July 2014 — The Cookware Company v OHIM — Fissler (VITA+VERDE)

(Case T-535/14)

2014/C 351/16

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Cookware Company Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: K. Manhaeve, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fissler GmbH (Idar-Oberstein, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 April 2014 given in Case R 1082/2013-2. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 April 2014 given in Case R 1082/2013-2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in colour containing the verbal elements ‘VITA+VERDE’ for gods in Class 21 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 0 73  054

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The earlier CTM No 1 0 13  787 for the word ‘vitavit’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and upheld the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLCOS05000 L1010 PH]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 3, 2009, notifying the public regarding meeting dates and locations for the BLM Colorado Southwest Resource Advisory Council (RAC). The location of the August 28, 2009 meeting was incorrect.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Sharrow, BLM Uncompahgre Field Manager, 2505 S. Townsend Ave., Montrose, CO 81401, 970-240-5300; or Erin Curtis, Public Affairs Specialist, 2815 H Rd., Grand Junction, CO 81506, 970-244-3097.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 3, 2009, FR Doc. E9-7606, on page 15519, the second column, correct the                         **ADDRESSES**                         caption to read:                    

# ADDRESSES:

The Southwest Colorado RAC meetings will be held May 29, 2009, in Dolores, CO, at the Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501 Highway 184, Dolores, CO 81323; August 28, 2009, at the Mary Stigall Theater in the Mosley Arts Center, 304 Silver Street in Lake City, CO 81235; and November 6, 2009, in Delta, CO at the Bill Heddles Recreation Center, 530 Gunnison River Drive, Delta, CO 81416. Field trips will be conducted to appropriate sites the day before each scheduled meeting. All Southwest Colorado RAC meetings will begin at 9 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 4 p.m., with public comment periods regarding matters on the agenda at 2:30 p.m.

Barbara Sharrow,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. E9-18215 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 102 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 102

To refer S. 840 entitled ``For the relief of the estate of Dr. Beatrice 
  Braude.'' to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 28 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

  Mr. Moynihan (for himself and Mr. D'Amato) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To refer S. 840 entitled ``For the relief of the estate of Dr. Beatrice 
  Braude.'' to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal 
                      Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved, That the bill S. 840 entitled ``For the relief of the 
estate of Dr. Beatrice Braude.'' now pending in the Senate, together 
with all the accompanying papers, is referred to the Chief Judge of the 
United States Court of Federal Claims. The Chief Judge shall proceed 
with the same in accordance with the provisions of sections 1492 and 
2509 of title 28, United States Code, and report thereon to the Senate, 
at the earliest practicable date, giving such findings of fact and 
conclusions thereon as shall be sufficient to inform the Congress of 
the nature and character of the demand as a claim, legal or equitable, 
against the United States or a gratuity and the amount, if any, legally 
or equitably due to the claimants from the United States.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 34.15**

**KATZ**

**SAPPER**

**& MILLER**

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

Managing Member 

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 

New York, NY 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2017 Compliance by Park Bridge LenderServices LLC with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”), that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, excluding those criteria determined by management and noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit B to Management’s Report. The transactions coveredby this report are only those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust advisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. ReferenceExhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by this examination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination wasconducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Ourexamination included tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during the specified period,and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samplesmay not have included servicing activities related to each asset backed transaction included in the Platform. An examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above orsubsequent to our tests that may have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Companycomplied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’s Report with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A to Management’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31,2017, for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material aspects. 

/s/ Katz, Sapper & Miller LLP 

New York, NY 

February 15, 2018
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-6566, styled State v. Jason Miears, pending in the 379th

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00566-CR

IN RE Jason MIEARS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 7, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 8, 2009, relator Jason Miears filed a petition for writ of mandamus,

complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his motion to dismiss counsel, objection to an

expert, and petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, on September 24, 2009, the trial court

denied relator’s motion to dismiss his counsel. Therefore, we DENY AS MOOT relator’s petition

for writ of mandamus as it pertains to his motion to dismiss counsel. 

As to relator’s remaining complaints, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the

criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently confined. A criminal
04-09-00566-CR

-2-

defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation of any form. See Dunn v. State, 819 S.W.2d 510,

525 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see also Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App.

2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Consequently, the trial court

did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on relator’s pro se objection and petition filed in the

criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Therefore, we conclude that relator has not shown

himself entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 194

Commending Israel and Egypt on the fifteenth anniversary of the signing

of the historic Treaty of Peace between the Arab Republic of Egypt

and the State of Israel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. PELL (for himself, Mr. HELMS, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. BROWN, Mr. MITCHELL, and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commending Israel and Egypt on the fifteenth anniversary

of the signing of the historic Treaty of Peace between

the Arab Republic of Egypt and the State of Israel.

Whereas, March 26, 1994, is the fifteenth anniversary of the

signing by Prime Minister Begin of Israel and President

Sadat of Egypt of the Treaty of Peace between the Arab

Republic of Egypt and the State of Israel;

Whereas the Treaty of Peace has resulted in the longest period without hostilities between Israel and an Arab neighbor since the founding of Israel in 1948;

Whereas the Treaty of Peace has served as the foundation of

subsequent initiatives to secure a lasting peace between

Israel and its Arab neighbors; and
2

SRES 194 ATS

Whereas the Treaty of Peace has served to enhance regional

stability in the Middle East: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the United States Senate—

2 (1) congratulates Israel and Egypt on the fif3 teenth anniversary of the signing of the historic

4 Treaty of Peace between the Arab Republic of Egypt

5 and the State of Israel;

6 (2) commends Israel and Egypt for their for7 titude and commitment to international peace and

8 regional stability; and

9 (3) reaffirms its support for Israel and Egypt

10 as they continue to pursue a lasting peace in the

11 Middle East.

Æ
Exhibit 99.5



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Greg Guyatt, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form
40-F of CannTrust Holdings Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:



a. Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



c. Evaluated the effectiveness
of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d. Disclosed in this report
any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and



5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors
and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a. All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b. Any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: March 28, 2019



|/s/ Greg Guyatt               | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Greg Guyatt                   | 
|Chief Financial Officer       | 
|(principal financial officer) |
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Itec Environmental Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary M. De Laurentiis, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gary M. De Laurentiis

Gary M. De Laurentiis

Chief Executive Officer

Acting Chief Financial Officer



May 17, 2004
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 180

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Office of Senate Fair

Employment Practices in Betty Johnson v. Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices, No. 94–6002 (Fed. Cir.).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 9 (legislative day JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. LEVIN (for Mr. MITCHELL) (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To direct the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Office

of Senate Fair Employment Practices in Betty Johnson

v. Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices, No. 94–

6002 (Fed. Cir.).

Whereas, in the case of Betty Johnson v. Office of Senate

Fair Employment Practices, No 94–6002, pending in the

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,

the Office of Senate Fair Employment Practices is the

respondent in a proceeding under section 309 of the Civil

Rights Act of 1991 (2 U.S.C. 1209), to review a final decision concerning allegations of discrimination in Senate

employment;

Whereas section 303(f) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (2

U.S.C. 1203(f)) provides that for the purpose of rep-
2

SRES 180 ATS

resentation by the Senate Legal Counsel, the Office of

Senate Fair Employment Practices shall be deemed a

committee within the meaning of title VII of the Ethics

in Government Act of 1978 (2 U.S.C. 288, et seq.);

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, (2 U.S.C. 288b(a),

288c(a)(1)), the Senate may direct its Counsel to defend

a committee of the Senate in any civil action in which

there is placed in issue any action taken by such committee in its official capacity: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to represent the Office of Senate Fair Employment Prac3 tices in the case of Betty Johnson v. Office of Senate Fair

4 Employment Practices.

Æ
P 

Appendix 

. Avaak 

wangnl uoclWnq samery) 

Maz. Azerrt SpaeO 

Max. DeSCam 9pud 

Msa.SpeeU 

Ma.. FligM AIIWOa 

Maz. FI18M TImC 

GpmaGtg Tenpes6xv RSnge 

GVS 

Girrtd 

CnMrbtabla RsnOe 

• Viaiqn Pbeiuorsrg 

velocM rMBa 

au3ce Rerge 

OperetnB r>erga 

DFgPoCO Em~ 

• CarllBla 

Sin3d 

IBtC 

I50 0.9nge 

Elatt'mlc 3ntnr Spcatl 

Imaga M9ic S~ 

551 RpbB!9(ity MOtl33 

Kmo Rea,ra:g Mo693 

Mak ®o-m3nvaeosasge 

SyJpttD9a FJSFOml1m 

Suppatatl SD Cba Type3 

Cp9reGlg TempeeeWre RenOe 

12800 

5 mr3 

3 Mn 

18 m)a (ATTI m009, rqrYMJ 

8000m 

Appwimanb 23 mtwles 

oro a a°D 

GF$r[iL0NA5$ 

vecdr - eo• ro .37 

<8 m$ (ALtu(b 2 m) 

30 cm300 Cm 

30 cm-370 cm 

3VtbG6 MM CIaBI PBuB1118IM Btl"e Ngrmr12 (IJIX> 16) 

SaryEXMDRif23' EJbCtluHpdaBlv12AM(IOWDSreft:12.781.1) 

FGN{Fe'aOlVery930 2Omm(35mmbmlalequlvaRenl)V2.8 

106320D(wae0) IOP1800(plltelJ 

8 3 - 1/0000 C 

<ODD%3000 

SNQY &1101 

Bur313tqaliflV: 3f5/7 I(am93 

Aulb Exy04rte 99aCYBUnO IAEB): 315 brMRalatl Maroas a10.7EV 8.36 

Timel9pse 

uro : 4oea.2leop aem. 384o,aleap 242500 

FFID: 192(kx108Q12N25fJNd8F.QW 

ro:l2eceT2ap 2az5xvae5u.+eo 

eo Moca 

FAT321a)ffAT P~JPEG.I]NG V693MP4AK]V(MPEG4AVGM.284) 

MoroSD, Max Cep9oly 6408. DImR 10 or t,MS-t raGng reqWetl 

OOCnmC 

• Rbrlple CCrlWler 

OpmelinB Fiaquonty 

Met. Tr~ Di+bnCe 

V76?bQnlurFbq 

Opnafmg TemO3mfLmRmga 

B983y 

Mobae De.ca nam 

TrenHnll43r Pbwer (EIRV) 

w«kng VaMge 

~ 

2.400 Gt1[ 2.483 (Lie 

2 km (OUt00IX69ntl uMbaruCE3r1) 

1.68 

0°C b <OC 

8000mAn LiPb25 

Tablol3 antl SM&Ipqn33 

FCC: 20 tlbm: CE:18 tlbm 

1.2AOT.e V 

17.4 v 

loow 

• kue6genz Fight Bamy ( RCi998DMYH52 V ) 

Gepatily 44801nAh 

Vdtepe 152 V 

&98abyTyp3 LIPo6.S 

Ererp/ 88 Wn 

nelwapn 3e5g 

Dperamg Temperanre t0°G to <mC 

Ma<Q>g(frgPoxm t00w
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JOAN LICHTMAN,

Petitioner

v.

BRUCE CASTOR AND LANCE ROGERS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 114 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of September, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7854 

To require schools and child welfare agencies to be notified when an unaccompanied minor is placed in the jurisdiction of such schools and agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2024 

Mr. GRIFFITH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require schools and child welfare agencies to be notified 

when an unaccompanied minor is placed in the jurisdiction of such schools and agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unaccompanied Minor 

5 Placement Notification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF DIRECTOR TO NOTIFY LOCAL 

7 SCHOOLS AND CHILD WELFARE AGENCIES OF 

8 PLACEMENT. 

9 Section 462(b)(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 

10 2002 (6 U.S.C. § 279(b)(2)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7854 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

2 at the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

4 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) shall, not later than 96 hours after a 

7 placement determination releasing an unaccom8 panied alien child to a qualified sponsor, notify 

9 the school district and child welfare agency in 

10 the jurisdiction where an unaccompanied alien 

11 child is to be placed of the placement, including 

12 the address of the sponsor’s residence, to en13 sure the child’s welfare and continuity of edu14 cation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB