alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.4500 Immunoelectrophoresis equipment. ( a ) *Identification.* Immunoelectrophoresis equipment for clinical use with its electrical power supply is a device used for separating protein molecules. Immunoelectrophoresis is a procedure in which a complex protein mixture is placed in an agar gel and the various proteins are separated on the basis of their relative mobilities under the influence of an electric current. The separated proteins are then permitted to diffuse through the agar toward a multispecific antiserum, allowing precipitation and visualization of the separate complexes.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 25047, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38792, July 25, 2001]
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 112

Urging sanctions to be imposed against the Burmese government, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 24 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. SIMON, Mr. PELL, Mr. HELMS, Mr. BIDEN,

Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. KERREY, and Mr.

HATFIELD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

MAY 27 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Reported by Mr. PELL, without amendment

MAY 27 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Urging sanctions to be imposed against the Burmese

government, and for other purposes.

Whereas the military junta in Burma known as the State

Law and Order Restoration Council (in this preamble referred to as the ‘‘SLORC’’) brutally suppressed peaceful

democratic demonstrations in September 1988;

Whereas the Senate of the United States has repeatedly condemned and continues its condemnation of the SLORC;

Whereas the SLORC does not represent the people of Burma,

since the people of Burma gave the National League for
2

•SRES 112 ATS

Democracy a clear victory in the election of May 27,

1990;

Whereas the SLORC has held Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, a

leader of the National League for Democracy and the

winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for 1991, under house

arrest since July 1989;

Whereas the United Nations Human Rights Commission

unanimously adopted on March 5, 1993, a resolution deploring the human rights situation in Burma and the

continued arrest of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi; and

Whereas on March 12, 1992, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate unanimously stated that (1) the

SLORC does not represent the Burmese people and

should transfer power to the winners of the 1990 elections, (2) United States military attach ́es should be withdrawn from Burma, and (3) the United States should oppose United Nations Development Program funding for

Burma: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 President, the Secretary of State, and other United States

3 Government representatives should—

4 (1) seek the immediate release of Daw Aung

5 San Suu Kyi from arrest and the transfer of power

6 to the winners of the 1990 elections in Burma; and

7 (2) encourage the adoption by the United Na8 tions Security Council of an arms embargo and

9 other sanctions against the regime of the State Law

10 and Order Restoration Council in Burma.
3

•SRES 112 ATS

1 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

2 a copy of this resolution to the President and the Sec3 retary of State.

Æ
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI

GOVERNOR MEMORANDUM TO : Board of Environmental Protection FROM : Andrea Lani, Bureau. ofAir Quality DATE: June 7, 2007 RE: Posting to Public Hearing: Chapter 152, Control of Emissions ofVolatile Organic DAVID P . LITTELL COMMISSIONER

Compounds fromConsumer Products Statutory and Reaulatory Reference: A . Statutory authority.

B. 38 MRSA Section 585-A provides that the Board of Environmental Protection "may

establish and amend regulations to implement ambient air quality standards and emission standards. These regulations shall be designed to achieve and maintain ambient air quality standards and emission standards within any region and prevent air pollution." Specific legal mandates requiring adoption. There are no legal mandates requiring adoption of these amendments. Location/Applicability: The proposed regulation will apply statewide. Description: Chapter 152 established emissions limits for volatile organic compound (VOC) content of consumer products in approximately 80categories. The proposed amendments, which are based on a model rule developed by the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC), increase the number of categories of regulated consumer products by 18. The proposed amendments also include limits on certain toxic compounds in some consumer products. In addition, the proposed amendments modify the date-coding requirements to make reporting less onerous to the regulated industries and clarify that, with certain exceptions, the sell-through period for products manufactured prior to the effective date is indefinite. AUGUSTA 17 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 (207) 287-7688 FAX: (207) 287-7826 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST . BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE

106 HOGAN ROAD 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769-2094 (207) 941-4570 FAX: (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 760-3143 web site: www

.maine .gov/dep printed on recycled paperEnvironmental Issues:

The proposed rule amendments are designed to reduce VOCemissions fromconsumer products. Volatile organic compounds react with nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight to form ground level ozone, which is responsible for exacerbating a variety of respiratory ailments, such as asthma. Although children, the elderly and those with respiratory problems are most at risk, even healthy individuals may experience increased respiratory ailments and other symptoms when they are exposed to ambient ozone while engaged in activity that involves physical exertion. Although these symptoms are often temporary, repeated exposure can result in permanent lung damage. Consumer products in Maine are responsible for approximately 12 tons of VOC emissions per day. The proposed rule is estimated to reduce VOC emissions by approximately 0 .2 tons per day. Departmental Recommendation : The Department recommends that the Board schedule a public hearing for this proposal on August 2, 2007 and proposes a public comment period deadline ofAugust 17, 2007. Estimated Time of Presentation: 15 minutes.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38178-38179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 803-087]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company, California; Notice of 
Availability of Final Environmental Assessment

July 24, 2009.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) regulations, 18 
CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the

[[Page 38179]]

Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new 
license for the DeSabla-Centerville Hydroelectric Project (project), 
located on Butte Creek in Butte County, California, and has prepared a 
final environmental assessment (final EA). In the final EA, Commission 
staff analyze the potential environmental effects of relicensing the 
project and conclude that issuing a new license for the project, with 
appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major 
federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    A copy of the final EA is on file with the Commission and is 
available for public inspection. The final EA may also be viewed on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' 
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the 
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact 
FERC Online Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#53151601101c3d3f3a3d36002623233c212713353621307d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f191a0d1c10313336313a0c2a2f2f302d2b1f393a2d3c71383029">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18300 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           61177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4725
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 65902
<PP&E>                                         1409732
<DEPRECIATION>                                  361236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1670634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            48797
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10499
<OTHER-SE>                                     1391850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1402349
<SALES>                                          69276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 69276
<CGS>                                            28164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1168025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1108214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1108214)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1108214)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8147 

To repeal the Corporate Transparency Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Mr. DAVIDSON (for himself, Ms. HAGEMAN, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. EDWARDS, 

Mr. NORMAN, Mr. OGLES, Mr. POSEY, Mr. HERN, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mrs. FISCHBACH, Mr. FALLON, and Mr. ARMSTRONG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the Corporate Transparency Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repealing Big Brother 

5 Overreach Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Corporate Transparency Act 

8 (title LXIV of division F of the William M. (Mac) Thorn9 berry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

10 2021 (Public Law 116–283; 134 Stat. 4604)) and the 

11 amendments made by that Act are repealed. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8147 IH

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 (1) Title 31, United States Code, is amended— 

3 (A) in section 5321(a)— 

4 (i) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘sec5 tions 5314, 5315, and 5336’’ each place 

6 the term appears and inserting ‘‘sections 

7 5314 and 5315’’; and 

8 (ii) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘(ex9 cept section 5336)’’ each place the term 

10 appears; and 

11 (B) in section 5322, by striking ‘‘section 

12 5315, 5324, or 5336’’ each place the term ap13 pears and inserting ‘‘section 5315 or 5324’’. 

14 (2) Title LXV of the Anti-Money Laundering 

15 Act of 2020 (division F of the of the William M. 

16 (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization 

17 Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116–283; 134 

18 Stat. 4604)) is amended— 

19 (A) by repealing section 6502 (134 Stat. 

20 4626); and 

21 (B) in section 6509 (134 Stat. 4633)— 

22 (i) by striking ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 

23 Subsection (l)’’ and inserting ‘‘Subsection 

24 (l)’’; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8147 IH

1 (ii) by striking subsection (b). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 83

Designating the week beginning February 6, 1994, as ‘‘Lincoln Legacy

Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 21 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. DECONCINI (for himself and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning February 6, 1994, as

‘‘Lincoln Legacy Week’’.

Whereas Abraham Lincoln exemplified honesty and fairness

to all people, generosity of spirit, and unswerving dedication to upholding democracy, human dignity, and the integrity of the United States of America;

Whereas February 12, 1994, marks the anniversary of the

birth of Abraham Lincoln;

Whereas Abraham Lincoln is revered throughout the world

for his vision of freedom and equality;

Whereas Abraham Lincoln’s contributions have touched the

lives of the people of the United States;
2

SJ 83 IS

Whereas Abraham Lincoln’s legacy of freedom and equality

for all people continues to capture the imagination of humanity;

Whereas the life and ideals of Abraham Lincoln are commemorated by the Lincoln Memorial;

Whereas the Lincoln Memorial has served as a platform for

individuals to exercise their democratic freedoms in support of civil rights, equal rights, and constitutional rights;

Whereas the legacy of Abraham Lincoln has inspired individuals in the United States, such as Dr. Martin Luther

King, Jr., to gather at the Lincoln Memorial to share

their dreams and lift their voices for a better United

States;

Whereas the youth of the United States will display the ideals

of freedom and civil rights by joining in the national

‘‘Pennies Make a Monumental Difference’’ campaign,

which emphasizes the importance of the involvement of

individuals;

Whereas during the week beginning February 6, 1994, students across the Nation will study the legacy of Abraham

Lincoln and participate in the ‘‘Pennies Make a Monumental Difference’’ campaign to support new exhibits at

the Lincoln Memorial; and

Whereas during the week beginning February 6, 1994, activities will occur that are designed to encourage people to

promote the legacy of Abraham Lincoln and further the

ideals of freedom and equality for all: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
3

SJ 83 IS

1 That the week beginning February 6, 1994, is designated

2 as ‘‘Lincoln Legacy Week’’, and the President is author3 ized and requested to issue a proclamation calling on the

4 people of the United States to observe the week with ap5 propriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
§ 1.1016-10 Substituted basis. ( a ) Whenever it appears that the basis of property in the hands of the taxpayer is a substituted basis, as defined in section 1016(b), the adjustments indicated in §§ 1.1016-1 to 1.1016-6, inclusive, shall be made after first making in respect of such substituted basis proper adjustments of a similar nature in respect of the period during which the property was held by the transferor, donor, or grantor, or during which the other property was held by the person for whom the basis is to be determined. In addition, whenever it appears that the basis of property in the hands of the taxpayer is a substituted basis, as defined in section 1016(b)(1), the adjustments indicated in §§ 1.1016-7 to 1.1016-9, inclusive, and in section 1017 shall also be made, whenever necessary, after first making in respect of such substituted basis a proper adjustment of a similar nature in respect of the period during which the property was held by the transferor, donor, or grantor. Similar rules shall also be applied in the case of a series of substituted bases.
( b ) cation of this section may be illustrated by the following example:
Example: A, who makes his returns upon the calendar year basis, in 1935 purchased the X Building and subsequently gave it to his son B. B exchanged the X Building for the Y Building in a tax-free exchange, and then gave the Y Building to his wife C. C, in determining the gain from the sale or disposition of the Y Building in 1954, is required to reduce the basis of the building by deductions for depreciation which were successively allowed (but not less than the amount allowable) to A and B upon the X Building and to B upon the Y Building, in addition to the deductions for depreciation allowed (but not less than the amount allowable) to herself during her ownership of the Y Building.
Order entered September 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00588-CV

TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC., Appellant

V.

ORIX CAPITAL MARKETS LLC AND WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N.A.,

Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-15428-G

ORDER

Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans

We DENY the “Motion of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. for Judicial Review of 

Court’s March 19, 2015 Order Denying Transcontinental’s Motion Pursuant to Section 52.0011 

of the Texas Property Code” because this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the order under 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.4.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2014112EN.01005102.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/51

---

Action brought on 12 February 2014 — Tecalan v OHIM (TECALAN)

(Case T-100/14)

2014/C 112/66

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tecalan GmbH (Grünberg, Germany) (represented by: S. Holthaus, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ensinger GmbH (Nufringen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 December 2013 in Case R 2308/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 December 2013 in Case R 2308/2012-1;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Tecalan GmbH

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Wordmark TECALAN for goods in Class 17 (Community trade mark registration No 6 203 285)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Ensinger GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark TECADUR for goods in Class 17

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Nemo

Piedmont

Meade

Pennington

Lawrence

Pennington

Meade

Lawrence

T03NR05E

T03NR06E

T02NR06E T02NR05E

T03NR07E

T02NR07E

T04NR05E T04NR06E

T03NR04E

T02NR04E

T04NR04E

1

7

6

2

8

8

4

8

3

1

2

9

4

5 4

5

5

3

5

7

7

1

8

2

3

9

8

9

6

5

4

9

7

6

8

6

6

7

7

11

12

11

11

11

18

31

19

30

9

31

36

34 32

24

33

25

12

16

26

12

10

36

13

34

14

23

33

32

21

35

17

28

27

12

14

23

32

24

13

10

22

27

29 25

31

16

22

15

19

20

29

20

17

10

26

10

21

30

15

35

29

31

18

30 28

19

18

20

17

32 33

34

35 36 31 32

4

33

9

1

13 18 17

14 15

1

13 16

16

17

21

18

28

14

15

33

18 17 16

12

36

25

24

13

12

36

16

.

13

0 0.5 1 2 3

Miles

Steamboat Proposed Action

Steamboat Boundary

Private Land

Proposed Vegetation Treatments

Commercial Hardwood Enhancement

Hardwood Enhancement

Commercial Meadow Enhancement

Meadow Enhancement

Commercial Thin - 40 BA

Commercial Thin - 50 BA

Commercial Thin - 60 BA

Commercial Thin - 80 BA

Group Selection

Individual Tree Selection

Overstory Removal

Patch Clearcut

Non-commercial Thin

Product-other-than-log

Shelterwood Cut

Understory Thin
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00129-CV

GEORGE E. ("TRAE") FOWLER, III, 

TF MANAGEMENT CO., LLC, 

GENERAL PARTNER OF NTX 

LAND DEVELOPMENT, LP, AND 

NTX LAND DEVELOPMENT, LP.

APPELLANTS

V.

NORTH TEXAS LAND 

DEVELOPMENT, A JOINT 

VENTURE, AND HENRY RAHMANI, 

INDIVIDUALLY

APPELLEES 

------------

FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellants’ Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court’s

opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 12, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 17 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 17

 To amend paragraph 4 of rule XXV of the Standing Rules of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

 Mr. Mitchell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To amend paragraph 4 of rule XXV of the Standing Rules of the Senate.

    Resolved, That paragraph 4 of rule XXV of the Standing Rules of the 
Senate as amended, is amended by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(h)(1)'' and 
by inserting the following new paragraph thereafter:
    ``(B) A Senator who during the One Hundred and Third Congress 
serves on the Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Committee 
on Finance, and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, 
and who serves as chairman of a committee listed in paragraph 2, may 
serve as chairman of two subcommittees of all committees listed in 
paragraph 2 of which he is a member.''.

                                 <all>
```