alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b) 
AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 
OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick W. Cavanagh,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                         | 
|------------------------ | 
|/s/ PATRICK
 W. CAVANAGH | 
|                         | 
|Patrick W.
 Cavanagh     | 
|Chief
 Executive Officer | 
|Williams
 Controls, Inc. | 
|February 9,
 2011        | 

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Community National Bancorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Theron G. Reed, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry L. Alston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/S/ Theron G. Reed
Theron G. Reed
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002

/S/ Terry L. Alston
Terry L. Alston
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002
#### Jules H. Tucker *v.*Pauline Z. Halay et al.

King, C. J., Alcokn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.

Argued May 9

decided May 21, 1968

*Edward 8. Ludorf,*for the appellants (defendants).

*Herbert A. Lane,*with whom, on the brief, was *Jerome A. Rosen,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Per Curiam.

The defendants have appealed from a judgment rendered for the plaintiff following a verdict in his favor and a denial of their motion to set the verdict aside. The sole issue is whether there was both sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of Pauline Z. Halay, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, and a lack of evidence compelling a finding of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff to sustain a plaintiff’s verdict.

The verdict of the jury must stand if they could reasonably have reached their conclusion, and we test the ruling of the trial court in refusing to set aside the verdict on the basis of the evidence printed in the appendices to the briefs. *Lucier*v. *Meriden-Wallingford Sand & Stone Co.,*153 Conn. 422, 427, 216 A.2d 818. The concurrence of the judgments of the judge and the jury, who saw the *634witnesses and heard the testimony, is a powerful argument for sustaining the action of the trial court. *Chanosky*v. *City Building Supply Co.,*152 Conn. 642, 643, 211 A.2d 141. The evidence must he given the most favorable construction to which it is reasonably entitled in support of the verdict. *Petrizzo*v. *Commercial Contractors Corporation,*152 Conn. 491, 499, 208 A.2d 748.

The plaintiff sustained serious injuries when his motorcycle collided with the rear of the defendant’s automobile. Although there was a conflict in the testimony, that of two eyewitnesses fully supported the plaintiff’s allegation that the collision was caused by the negligence of the defendant in suddenly stopping her car on the highway without giving an adequate or timely signal and when no emergency confronted her. The evidence did not compel a finding of any contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

There is no need to discuss the evidence in detail. When there is evidence to support the finding of a jury, it is futile to appeal on the basis of a claim that the jury would have reached a contrary result if they had credited the testimony of one witness as against that of another. “Litigants have a constitutional right to have issues of fact determined by the jury. *Ardoline*v. *Keegan,*140 Conn. 552, 555, 102 A.2d 352. The credibility of witnesses and the weight to be accorded to their testimony lie within the province of the jury. We cannot retry the case.” *Desmarais*v. *Pinto,*147 Conn. 109, 110, 157 A.2d 596.

There is no error.
#### § 1.651(b)-1 Deduction for distributions to beneficiaries.

In computing its taxable income, a simple trust is allowed a deduction for the amount of income which is required under the terms of the trust instrument to be distributed currently to beneficiaries. If the amount of income required to be distributed currently exceeds the distributable net income, the deduction allowable to the trust is limited to the amount of the distributable net income. For this purpose the amount of income required to be distributed currently, or distributable net income, whichever is applicable, does not include items of trust income (adjusted for deductions allocable thereto) which are not included in the gross income of the trust. For determination of the character of the income required to be distributed currently, see § 1.652(b)-2. Accordingly, for the purposes of determining the deduction allowable to the trust under section 651, distributable net income is computed without the modifications specified in paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) of section 643(a), relating to tax-exempt interest, foreign income, and excluded dividends. For example: Assume that the distributable net income of a trust as computed under section 643(a) amounts to $99,000 but includes nontaxable income of $9,000. Then distributable net income for the purpose of determining the deduction allowable under section 651 is $90,000 ($99,000 less $9,000 nontaxable income).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                 /s/ Thomas A. Murdock
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Thomas A. Murdock
                               Chief Executive Officer
§ 1.411(a)-8T Changes in vesting schedule (temporary). ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Election of former schedule* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Under section 411(a)(10)(B), for plan years for which section 411 applies, if the vesting schedule of a plan is amended, the plan will not be treated as meeting the minimum vesting standards of section 411(a)(2) unless the plan as amended provides that each participant whose nonforfeitable percentage of his accrued benefit derived from employer contributions is determined under such schedule, and who has completed at least 3 years of service with the employer, may elect, during the election period, to have the nonforfeitable percentage of his accrued benefit derived from employer contributions determined without regard to such amendment. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, no election need be provided for any participant whose nonforfeitable percentage under the plan, as amended, at any time cannot be less than such percentage determined without regard to such amendment. For employees not described in § 1.411(a)-3T(e)(1), this section shall be applied by substituting “5 years of service” for “3 years of service” where such language appears.
( 2 ) *Election period.* For purposes of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, the election period under the plan must begin no later than the date the plan amendment is adopted and end no earlier than the latest of the following dates: ( i ) The date which is 60 days after the day the plan amendment is adopted,
( ii ) The date which is 60 days after the day the plan amendment becomes effective, or
( iii ) The date which is 60 days after the day the participant is issued written notice of the plan amendment by the employer or plan administrator.
( 3 ) *Service requirement.* For purposes of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, a participant shall be considered to have completed 3 years of service if such participant has completed 3 years of service, whether or not consecutive, without regard to the exceptions of section 411(a)(4) prior to the expiration of the election period described in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. For the meaning of the term “year of service”, see regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Labor under 29 CFR Part 2530, relating to minimum standards for employee pension benefit plans.
[T.D. 8170, 53 FR 241, Jan. 6, 1988]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN DUFFY CONOVER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 476 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THESUPREME COURT OF 

### PENNSYLVANIA Inthe Matter of : No.2055 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 DEAN I. 

### ORLOFF : No. 124 DB 2012 PETITION FOR 

### REINSTATEMENT : 

### Attorney Registration No.

### 48217

: 

### (Philadelphia) ORDER PER 

### CURIAM AND NOW, this 22nd 

### day of June, 2017, the Petition for Reinstatement is 

### granted. Petitioner is 

### directed to pay the 

### expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing ofthe Petitionfor Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).
#### § 1.410(a)-8 Five consecutive 1-year breaks in service, transitional rules under the Retirement Equity Act of 1984.

Sections 410(a)(5)(D) and 411(a)(6)(D), as amended by the Retirement Equity Act of 1984 (REA 1984), permit a plan to disregard years of service that were disregarded under the plan provisions satisfying those sections (as in effect on August 22, 1984) as of the day before the REA amendments apply to the plan. Under section 302(a) of REA 1984, the new break-in-service rules generally apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 1984. Thus, for example, assume a plan has a calendar plan year and disregarded years of service as permitted by sections 410(a)(5)(D) and 411(a)(6)(D) as in effect on August 22, 1984. An employee completed two years of service in 1981 and 1982, and then incurred two consecutive 1-year breaks in service in 1983 and 1984. The plans may disregard the prior years of service even though the employee did not incur five consecutive 1-year breaks in service. On the other hand, assume the employee completed three consecutive years of service beginning in 1980, and incurred two 1-year breaks in service in 1983 and 1984. Because, as of December 31, 1984, the years of service credited before 1983 could not be disregarded, whether the plan may subsequently disregard those years of service would be governed by the rules enacted by REA 1984.

[T.D. 8219, 53 FR 31851, Aug. 22, 1988; 53 FR 48534, Dec. 1, 1988]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7112

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA FREDERICK DAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:16-cr-00381-RMG-1; 2:20-cv02053-RMG)

Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: November 22, 2021

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Frederick Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7112 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/22/2021 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM: 

Joshua Frederick Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Twenty-one days after the district court issued its order denying 

the motion, Davis filed a letter challenging the factual determinations of the district court, 

seeking subpoenas to compel the production of evidence, requesting reconsideration of the 

denial of the motion, and inquiring about the possibility of appointment of counsel.∗

 The 

district court has taken no action in response to this letter. “[I]f a post-judgment motion is 

[timely] filed . . . and calls into question the correctness of that judgment it should be treated 

as a motion under [Fed. R. Civ. P.] 59(e), however it may be formally styled.” MLC Auto., 

LLC v. Town of S. Pines, 532 F.3d 269, 277 (4th Cir. 2008) (quoting Dove v. CODESCO, 

569 F.2d 807, 809 (4th Cir. 1978)). “A motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed 

no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Thus, Davis’

postjudgment motion is properly construed as a timely-filed Rule 59(e) motion. 

Accordingly, we order a limited remand directing the district court to promptly 

docket Davis’ letter as a Rule 59(e) motion and to consider the motion on its merits. If 

either party is dissatisfied after the district court disposes of the Rule 59(e) motion and 

timely files a notice of appeal or amends its current notice, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii), 

any appeal from the district court’s final order will be consolidated with this appeal. 

∗ Although Davis stated that his letter was a “request,” the substance of the pleading 

seeks assistance and adjudication that is redressed by way of a motion.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7112 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/22/2021 Pg: 2 of 3
3

Regardless of the outcome of the Rule 59(e) motion, the record, as supplemented, will be 

returned to this court for further consideration. 

In ordering this limited remand, we express no opinion as to the merits of the 

motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7112 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/22/2021 Pg: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000854941
<NAME>                        Elegant Illusions, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,511,236
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  263,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,115,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,047,540
<PP&E>                                         1,056,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,187,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          90,596
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,434
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,983,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,187,616
<SALES>                                        3,864,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,864,356
<CGS>                                          1,149,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,149,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,383,310
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                331,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                   133,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            198,818
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   198,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.000
        


</TABLE>
§ 1.509(c)-1 Status of organization after termination of private foundation status. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of part II of subchapter F of this chapter, an organization whose status as a private foundation is terminated under section 507 shall be treated as an organization created on the day after the date of such termination. An organization whose private foundation status has been terminated under the provisions of section 507(a) will, if it continues to operate, be treated as a new organization and must, if it desires to be classified under section 501(c)(3), give notification that it is applying for recognition of section 501(c)(3) status pursuant to the provisions of section 508(a).
( b ) *Effect upon section 507(d)(1).* If the private foundation status of an organization has been terminated under section 507(b)(1)(B) and the regulations thereunder, and: ( 1 ) Such organization does not continue at all times thereafter to meet the requirements of section 509(a) (1), (2), or (3) (and is therefore no longer excluded from the definition of a private foundation); and
( 2 ) The status of such organization as a private foundation is thereafter terminated under section 507(a)
then the tax imposed under section 507(c)(1) upon the aggregate tax benefit (described in section 507(d)(1)) resulting from section 501(c)(3) status shall be computed only upon the aggregate tax benefit resulting after the date on which the organization again becomes a private foundation under subparagraph (1) of this paragraph. [T.D. 7212, 37 FR 21924, Oct. 17, 1972]
#### §§ 1.57-2-1.57-3 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Principal Plus Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,117,961
<SECURITIES>                                37,268,041
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,894,102<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,894,102<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,927,466<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,734,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                286,305<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            286,305<F4>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   286,305<F4>
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, securities and receivables and interest receivable,
total assets include net unrealized loss on open contracts of $186,648 and
net option premiums of $(139,500).
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $2,246,208, accrued
brokerage fees of $136,358, accrued administrative fees of
$172,749, accrued management fees of $34,089.
<F3>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(139,415), net
change in unrealized of $(567,384), interest income of $1,801,793 and
change in valuation of Yield Pool of $832,472.
<F4>Income-Pretax, Income Continuing and Net Income includes minority
interest in income of $(92,878).
</FN>



</TABLE>