alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8121 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

to prohibit congestion or cordon pricing in a value pricing program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2024 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 to prohibit congestion or cordon pricing 

in a value pricing program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CONGESTION OR CORDON 

4 PRICING. 

5 Section 1012(b) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor6 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 149 note) is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(9) PROHIBITION ON CONGESTION PRICING.— 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this subVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:52 May 15, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8121.IH H8121

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8121 IH

1 section, the Secretary may not establish or maintain 

2 a value pricing program under this section that in3 cludes value pricing, congestion pricing, or cordon 

4 pricing.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fannie Staples, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Gen. No. 53,025.

First District, Second Division.

January 14, 1969.

*112Devoe, Shadur, Mikva & Plotkin, of Chicago (Robert Plotkin and Robert C. Howard, of counsel), for appellants; William G. Clark, Attorney General of State of Illinois, of Springfield (Fred G. Leach, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago, Elmer C. Kissane and Anthony J. Onesto, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE LYONS.

Not to be published in full.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4959-4960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8769-2]


Notice of Open Meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory 
Board (EFAB)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA's EFAB will hold an open meeting of the full board in

[[Page 4960]]

Washington, DC on March 16-17, 2009. EFAB is an EPA advisory committee 
chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to provide 
advice and recommendations to EPA on creative approaches to funding 
environmental programs, projects, and activities.
    The purpose of this meeting is to hear from informed speakers on 
environmental finance issues, proposed legislation, Agency priorities, 
and to discuss progress with work products under EFAB's current 
Strategic Action Agenda.
    Environmental financing topics expected to be discussed include: 
Financial Assurance Mechanisms (Commercial Insurance & Cost 
Estimation); Financial Assurance and CO<INF>2</INF> Underground 
Injection Control/Carbon Capture and Sequestration; Water Loss 
Reduction (``Leaky Pipes''); Innovative Financing Tools, and State 
Revolving Fund Investment Options.
    This meeting is open to the public, however, seating is limited. 
All members of the public who are planning to attend the meeting must 
register in advance, no later than Friday, March 6, 2009.

DATES: Full Board Meeting is scheduled for March 16, 2009 from 1:30 
p.m.-5:30 p.m. and March 17, 2009 from 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Madison, 1177 15th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
Registration and Information Contact:
    To register for this meeting or get further information, please 
contact Sandra Keys, U.S. EPA, at (202) 564-4999 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ee858b979dc09d8f808a9c8fae8b9e8fc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d0bbb5a9a3fea3b1beb4a2b190b5a0b1feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a>. For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Sandra Keys. To request 
accommodations for a disability, contact Sandra Keys, preferably at 
least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as 
possible to process your request.

    Dated: January 22, 2009.
Joshua Baylson,
Acting Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Office of the Chief Financial 
Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-1809 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
39460.

#### HIPP v. CITY OF EAST POINT.

Decided April 19, 1962.

*Bagwell & Hames, James A. Bagwell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ezra E. Phillips,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The act of 1961 (Ga. L. 1961, p. 190), amended *Code*§§ 19-209 and 19-210 and repealed *Code*§§ 19-211 and 19-212. Such act also amended other Code *776sections not material to the present case. Prior to such time, the failure to serve the opposite party, unless such service was waived in writing, required a judgment dismissing the writ of certiorari. While the act of 1961 was entitled in part as “An Act to clarify, simplify and conform the procedure in certiorari proceedings to that prevailing in ordinary civil cases as to appearance day. . .” and to provide for amendments, it does not appear that the necessity of a timely service on the opposite party was dispensed with. *Code*§ 19-210 as amended, supra, provides: “All certiorari proceedings shall be filed in the clerk’s office within a reasonable time after sanction thereof, and shall be served on the respondent within five (5) days after such filing by the sheriff or his deputy, or by the petitioner or his attorney. A copy of the petition and writ shall also be served on the opposite party or his counsel or other legal representative, in person or by mail, and service shown by acknowledgment, or by certificate of the counsel or person perfecting such service.” Under such language it appears that the service upon the opposite party should *“also”*be made within five days after the filing of such writ in the clerk’s office. No service, or written waiver, appears in the record, and the judgments of the superior court dismissing the writ of certiorari and denying the motion to reinstate such writ of certiorari must be

*Affirmed.*

*Frankum and*Jordan, *JJ., concur.*
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 129

To designate both the month of August 1993 and the month of August

1994 as ‘‘National Slovak American Heritage Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. WOFFORD (for himself and Mr. PELL) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate both the month of August 1993 and the month

of August 1994 as ‘‘National Slovak American Heritage

Month’’.

Whereas Stefan Parmenius Stitnicky, a Slovak chronologist

and author of the poem ‘‘De Navigatione’’, came to the

New World as a member of Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s expedition in 1583;

Whereas Jan Boda, Stefan Mada, and other Slovaks were

among the first settlers of Jamestown, Virginia in 1609;

Whereas Slovak immigrants came to North America in great

numbers seeking religious, economic, and political freedom and, since the birth of this Nation, have labored diligently for the betterment of America;
2

•SRES 129 IS

Whereas the history of the Slovak people in the United States

reflects a hard-working and honorable presence for over

200 years and includes service in all of the Nation’s

wars, including the American Revolution;

Whereas Slovak-Americans, who comprise the second largest

Slav ethnic group in America, have distinguished themselves by contributing to the development of the sciences,

arts, literature, government, military service, athletics,

and education in the United States; and

Whereas in 1993 and 1994, Slovak-Americans celebrate the

independence of Slovakia and the centennials of Slovak

churches, newspapers, and fraternal organizations in the

United States and, in doing so, proudly proclaim their

pride in being Americans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the months of August 1993 and Au2 gust 1994 are each designated as ‘‘National Slovak Amer3 ican Heritage Month’’. The President is authorized and

4 requested to issue a proclamation calling on the people of

5 the United States to observe these months with appro6 priate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
STATE OP NEW MAIVIPSIME Inter-Dopartwitt Communication

FROM : Carole Richardson ~ Office of Legislative Budget Assistant State House, Room

102 Concord, New

Hampshire 03301 DATE: July 2, 2004

RE: 1~IS 04:122, FIS 04:123, FIS 04 :124 . FI S 04:12

5, FIS 04-126 and FIS 04 :127 

### TO : Michael Sclafani

Department of Environniental Services Hazen Drive Concord, NH 03302 Attached are the fiscal impact statements listed above . They should be reviewed and then submitted to the Division, of Administrative Rules, Office of Legislative Services, in accordance with the NIL Rulemaldne Manual dated September 2001 . 

### AttachmentsF

LBAO FIS 04:126 71? .104 Fiscal Impact Statement for Department of Environmental Services rules governing Hot Mix Asphalt Plants. [Envy4 2700] ' ' 1 . Comparison of the costs of the proposed rule(s) to the exlating rule(s) :

There are no costs attributable to either the proposed or existing rules. 

### 2 . Cite the Fai`Isral mandate. Identify the impact on state funds:

. There is no Federal mandate for these rules. However, these rules incorporate part of the Stiitelmf'plemeritation Plan which has been approved by the US Environmental ' Protection.Agency pursuant to the Federal CleanAirAct 42 U .S.C . Sectlon 7410

. NQ impact on state'funds, . 8 : Cost and benefits of ths proposed rule(s) : - Them are no-costs assocfated with tl* proposed full because, even if the existing rule were allowed to expire, affected sources would sdti be required to'compty with the federal rule-that Incorporates it at 40 CFR 52.1520 . A . To State general or State speclal funds: None. 

### B. To State cttl : .ens and political subdivisions: None. C . To Independently owned businesses: None.
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.4845 Powered rongeur. ( a ) *Identification.* A powered rongeur is a powered instrument used for cutting or biting bone during surgery involving the skull or spinal column.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      20,053,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,173,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,008
<INVENTORY>                                     65,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,426,375
<PP&E>                                       3,418,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                 955,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,745,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,532,483
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 25,697,414
<COMMON>                                         5,859
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,499,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,745,760
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,671,302
<CGS>                                           57,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,328,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             973,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (35,192,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (35,192,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (35,192,616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)
        

</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued019355N
ABAD Air, Inc., 10411 NW. 28th Street, Miami, FL 33172
June 21, 2009.013552N
Boston Shipping Enterprise, Inc., 506 Decatur Street, Brooklyn, NY 11233
April 16, 2009.004670F
The Pelixan Group, Inc., 3405-B NW. 72nd Avenue, Miami, FL 33122
May 9, 2009.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. E9-18097 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
EX-10.59



 





EXHIBIT 10.59




AMENDMENT TO MERGE THE




KEYCORP DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




INTO THE KEYCORP DEFERRED SAVINGS PLAN



WHEREAS, KeyCorp established the KeyCorp Deferred Compensation Plan and the KeyCorp Second Deferred
Compensation Plan to provide a nonqualified deferred compensation benefit to a select group of
management or highly compensated employees as described in Section 201(2), 301(3) and 401(a)(1) of
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and



WHEREAS, in maintaining the KeyCorp Deferred Compensation Plan and the KeyCorp Second Deferred
Compensation Plan, KeyCorp has been required to maintain duplicate administration structures for
each respective plan, and



WHEREAS, to prevent this duplication of administration and the associated participant confusion
associated with multiple plans it is desired that the KeyCorp Deferred Compensation Plan be merged
into the KeyCorp Deferred Savings Plan and that the KeyCorp Deferred Compensation Plan cease to
exist separate and apart from the KeyCorp Deferred Savings Plan.



NOW, THEREFORE, the KeyCorp Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby amended to add a new Article XIII
to the KeyCorp Deferred Compensation Plan to be effective as of December 31, 2006, to read in its
entirety as follows:




“ARTICLE XIII

MERGER INTO THE KEYCORP DEFERRED SAVINGS PLAN





	 	13.1	 	Merger of the Plan. Effective December 31, 2006 the KeyCorp
Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby merged into and made a part of the
KeyCorp Deferred Savings Plan, and all benefits that have accrued under the
Plan shall be merged into and shall become a part of the KeyCorp Deferred
Savings Plan.”





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, KeyCorp has caused this Amendment to the KeyCorp Deferred Compensation
Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the 21st day of December, 2006.




KEYCORP




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	                       /s/ Thomas Helfrich
 	 
	 	 	Thomas Helfrich 	 
	 	 	Executive Vice President
**Custom er Ser**  **vice Hotline: 1 -**  **800 -**  **438 -**  **2474 UNITED STA** 

**TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A**  **GENCY**

**REGION III 1650 A**  **rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103**  **- 2029**  June 24, 2013 Honorable Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Envir onmental Control 89 Kings Highway Dover, Delaware 19901 Dear Secretary

O’Mara : On May 31 , 2013 , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Delaware State I mplementation Plan (SI P) from the Delaware Department of Natural Res our ces and Environmental Control. The SI P revision addresses the requirements of the Clean Air Act section 110 infrastructure elements for the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) national ambient air quality standards

. EPA ha s determined that the submittal is admi nistratively and technically complete, and is being reviewed to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR)

. If members of y our staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Rose Quinto, Office of Air Program P lanning at (215) 814

- 2182, or at quin to.rose@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely , /s/ Diana Esher , Director Air Protection Division

cc: Mr. Ali Mirzakhalili, DNREC Mr. Ron ald D. Amirikian, DNREC
39365.

#### POWELL *et al.*v. THE STATE.

Jordan, Judge.

William and Watson Powell under indictments charging them with the offense of forgery were tried together and convicted in the Superior Court of McDuffie County. Their amended motions for new trial which were identical were denied and they have excepted to that judgment in their joint bill of exceptions. *Held:*

*615Decided March 15, 1962

Rehearing denied March 29, 1962.

*Joe W. Rowland, Jack D. Evans, J. W. Claxton,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Kenneth E. Goolsby, Solicitor-General,*contra.

1. This is a companion case to the case of *Kent v. State,*105 Ga. App. 565 (125 SE2d 96), in which this court affirmed the conviction of the defendant therein for the offense of forgery. The evidence in this case, which is substantially the same as that in the *Kent*case, supra, was sufficient to authorize the verdict rendered and the general grounds are therefore without merit. See *Kent v. State,*supra, division one of the opinion.

2. “Photographs, diagrams, maps, plans, and similar items are generally admissible, when relevant, to describe a person, place, or thing, for the purpose of explaining and applying the evidence and assisting the court and jury in understanding the case.” *Smith v. State,*202 Ga. 851, 866 (45 SE2d 267). Special ground one which assigns error on the admission in evidence by the State of certain photographs of a burned automobile is without merit, since, under the evidence in this case, the jury was authorized to find that said automobile had been used by the defendants and their co-conspirators in the matter under investigation and that said automobile had been burned by them in an effort to conceal their crime. See *Kent v. State,*supra, division two o'f the opinion.

3. The remaining special grounds assign error on an excerpt from the charge of the court, and- on the failure to charge without request a principle of law, .with reference to the testimony of Mrs. Florence Turpin, a witness for the State, who the defendants contended was an accomplice. As held in the *Kent*case, supra, the question of the connection of this witness with the crime was for the jury who were properly charged on this issue by the trial judge. These grounds are therefore without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015 (the Agreement), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the Certificate
Administrator), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as
Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2015 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned
as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 26, 2016



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen Montbach


Name:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director


CGCMT 2015-GC33
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 121 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 121

              To honor the work and life of Cesar Chavez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 17 (legislative day, June 15), 1993

   Mr. Reid  (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Simon, Mr. 
 Bradley) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              To honor the work and life of Cesar Chavez.

Whereas Cesar Chavez inspired America with his fight to improve the lives of 
        migrant farmworkers;
Whereas Cesar Chavez dedicated his life to serving the economically 
        disadvantaged and politically disenfranchised;
Whereas Cesar Chavez's struggle to organize migrant farmworkers was accomplished 
        with a commitment to nonviolence;
Whereas Cesar Chavez, as president and founder of the United Farm Workers Union, 
        brought a better life to thousands of laborers;
Whereas Cesar Chavez's life's work brought dignity and respect to all Mexican-
        Americans and other minority workers;
Whereas Cesar Chavez's efforts made possible the first collective bargaining Act 
        for continental United States farmworkers;
Whereas Cesar Chavez drew attention to the dangers caused by agricultural 
        pesticides to both farmworkers and consumers; and
Whereas Cesar Chavez has forever changed America for the better: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Senate of the United 
States honors the work and life of Cesar Chavez as one of the greatest 
leaders of human and civil rights advancement the United States has 
known.

                                 <all>
```