alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

As part of its strategic planning process, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) invites the public to attend and observe at a Workshop on Natural Products. The purpose of this workshop is to inform the NCCAM's third strategic plan by identifying particularly promising areas with the potential to yield new information about CAM natural product treatments.

The Workshop will take place on March 26, 2010 in Bethesda, Maryland. Those interested in CAM research are particularly encouraged to attend. Seating is limited.

*Background:*                         The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) was established in 1998 with the mission of exploring complementary and alternative healing practices in the context of rigorous science, training CAM researchers, and disseminating authoritative information to the public and professionals.                    

                        To date, NCCAM's efforts to rigorously study CAM, to train CAM researchers, and to communicate with the public and professionals, have been guided by NCCAM's previous strategic plans, located on the NCCAM Web site at                         *http://nccam.nih.gov/​about/​plans*.                    

*Participating:*                         The Workshop will take place on March 26, 2010 from 8:15 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on the NIH campus in Bethesda, Maryland.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        To request more information, visit the NCCAM Web site at                         *http://nccam.nih.gov,*                         call Carina May at 301-915-9763, or e-mail                         *CMay@Thehillgroup.com*.                    

Dated: March 3, 2010.

Jack Killen,

Deputy Director, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 2010-5164 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2014361EN.01001702.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/17

---

Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-594/14)

2014/C 361/24

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rami Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d'Elzius, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded;

| — | in consequence, order the European Union to pay compensation of EUR 5 00  000 for all the damage suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

in consequence, order the European Union to pay compensation of EUR 5 00  000 for all the damage suffered by the applicant;

| — | in the alternative, order that an expert be appointed to establish the extent of the damage suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, order that an expert be appointed to establish the extent of the damage suffered by the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-592/14 Makhlouf v Council.

Makhlouf

Council

---
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-29-2007

Lindsey v. Caterpillar Inc

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 05-4406

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Lindsey v. Caterpillar Inc" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1374.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1374
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 05-4406

_____________

ROSARIO LINDSEY, individually and as

Executrix of the Estate of Charles Lindsey,

Appellant

v.

CATERPILLAR, INC.

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

No. 03-cv-05762

District Judge: Honorable Garrett E. Brown, Jr., Chief Judge

_____________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It appearing that the Clerk made a typographical error in the spelling of the name

of counsel for Appellant, the precedential opinion filed on March 26, 2007 is hereby

amended to correct that typographical error. Neil E. Durkin, not Neil E. Durking, argued

on behalf of Appellant. The letter “g” is deleted from the listing of counsel’s name on

page one. This amendment does not change the date of filing, March 26, 2007.

For the Court,

/s/ Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

Dated: March 29, 2007

lwc/cc: RGB NED JHK
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8114 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finalizing 

a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to 

place certain limitations on Medicaid payments for home or communitybased services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2024 

Mrs. CAMMACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

from finalizing a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to place certain limitations 

on Medicaid payments for home or community-based 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FINALIZING PROPOSED RULE 

4 TO PLACE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS ON MED5 ICAID PAYMENTS. 

6 The Secretary of Health and Human Services may 

7 not— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8114 IH

1 (1) finalize, implement, or enforce the portion 

2 of the proposed rule issued by the Centers for Medi3 care & Medicaid Services titled ‘‘Medicaid Program; 

4 Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services’’ (88 Fed. 

5 Reg. 27960 (May 3, 2023)) related to the proposed 

6 requirement at section 441.302(k)(3)(i) of title 42, 

7 Code of Federal Regulations that at least 80 percent 

8 of all payments made under a State plan under title 

9 XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et 

10 seq.) with respect to homemaker services, home 

11 health aide services, and personal care services fur12 nished under a waiver under section 1915(c) of such 

13 Act be spent on compensation for direct care work14 ers (as such terms are used for purposes of such 

15 proposed rule); or 

16 (2) promulgate, implement, enforce, or other17 wise give effect to any other substantially similar 

18 rule that would require a minimum percentage of 

19 such payments for such services be spent on such 

20 compensation for direct care workers. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Jfourtfj Court of

i§>an gfotomo,

May 28,2014

No.04-13-00704-CV

Bill Miller Bar-B-Q Enterprises Ltd.,

Appellant

v.

Faith H. Gonzales,

Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 361586

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral

argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on July 8, 2014, to the following panel: Chief

Justice Stone, Justice Marion, and Justice Barnard. All parties will be notified of the Court's

decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such motion should be filed within ten (10)

days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on May 28, 2014.

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said court on this May 28, 2014.
# C_2015089EN.01004601.xml

| 16.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/46

---

Action brought on 17 December 2014 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-139/14)

(2015/C 089/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to carry over to 2013 days of leave not taken by the applicant in 2012 due to illness and the claim for damages in respect of material and non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decisions of 12 February 2014 and of 15 September 2014, and, |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of 12 February 2014 and of 15 September 2014, and,

| — | Annul, as appropriate, the pension statement for April 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, as appropriate, the pension statement for April 2013;

| — | Order the Parliament to compensate the applicant for the harm evaluated at EUR 26  677,56; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Parliament to compensate the applicant for the harm evaluated at EUR 26  677,56;

| — | Order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Parliament to pay the costs.

---
DEPARTMENT OF THE AI R FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY

4 Nov 15

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/ARM-100

FROM: HQ AFFSA/XOF

 6500 South MacArthur Blvd

 Bldg 4 

 Oklahoma City, OK 73169-6918

SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 5305J (Docket No. FAA-2000-8419)

14 CFR Exemption 5305 was granted to the United States Air Force on 26 April 1991. As 

amended to 5305J, it exempts the USAF from the provisions of 14 CFR Section 91.209 (a) (1) 

and (b) through 30 April 2016. The requirement for USAF aircraft to conduct airborne 

counternarcotics training operations in support of drug law enforcement and drug traffic 

interdiction without lighted aircraft position or anticollision lights remains unchanged. On behalf 

of the USAF, I request an extension in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 11.

In order to simplify USAF and FAA documentation/renewal procedures, the Air Force 

requests the expiration of 5305 to be September 30, 2018 in order to be simultaneous with the 

expiration of exemption 5100 of a similar subject.

Please contact me with any questions at e-mail: hqaffsa.xof@us.af.mil or 

(405) 582-6087. Thank you for your assistance.

11/4/2015

X

ANDREW B. KREBS, Maj, USAF

Chief of Flight Directives

Signed by: KREBS.ANDREW.B.1232714219
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 12-1116

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Corey Andrew Barr, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 13, 2012 Filed: June 18, 2012

___________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Corey Andrew Barr pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm after being convicted of domestic-violence offenses, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(9) and 924(a)(2). The District Court 1 imposed an above-Guide lines-range sentence. Barr’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence. Barr has filed a pro-se supplemental brief in which he claims ineffective assistance of couns el and also challenges his sentence.

1 The Honorable Greg Kays, United Stat es District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.In Barr’s written plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal his sentence, directly or collaterally, except for claims of ineffective a ssistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, or an illegal sent ence. Barr’s ineffec tive-assistance claim is not barred by the appeal waiver, but we d ecline to consider it on direct appeal. See United States v. McAdory , 501 F.3d 868, 872 (8th Cir. 2007) (“We ordinarily defer ineffective assistance of counsel claims to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings.”). And we conclude that the appeal waiv er is enforceable as to Barr’s remaining challenges to his sentence. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers), cert. denied , 540 U.S. 997 (2003). We have reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s moti on to withdraw, and we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________

-2-
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.7455 Fetal hemoglobin assay. ( a ) *Identification.* A fetal hemoglobin assay is a device that is used to determine the presence and distribution of fetal hemoglobin (hemoglobin F) in red cells or to measure the amount of fetal hemoglobin present. The assay may be used to detect fetal red cells in the maternal circulation or to detect the elevated levels of fetal hemoglobin exhibited in cases of hemoglobin abnormalities such as thalassemia (a hereditary hemolytic anemia characterized by a decreased synthesis of one or more types of hemoglobin polypeptide chains). The hemoglobin determination may be made by methods such as electrophoresis, alkali denaturation, column chromatography, or radial immunodiffusion.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). A fetal hemoglobin stain intended for use with a fetal hemoglobin assay is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.
[45 FR 60620, Sept. 12, 1980, as amended at 84 FR 71799, Dec. 30, 2019]
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,035-02

EX PARTE VICTORIA RAY RENDON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2020CR6864W-W1 IN THE 186TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of theft and sentenced to six months in the State Jail. Applicant,

through habeas counsel, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,

and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant complainsthat her theft offense was a misdemeanor and not a felony. The theft was

charged as a state-jailfelony because the State alleged that Applicant had two prior theft convictions.

See TEX PENAL CODE §31.03. Applicant, however, had no final conviction for one ofthe prior thefts

because Applicant successfully completed deferred-adjudication in that cause. Ex parte Langley, 833

S.W.2d 141 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). The trial court details all of Applicant’s prior convictions and

concludes that there was no other theft conviction that could have been properly pled. Ex parte
2

Parrott, 396 S.W.3d 531 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The trial court has entered findings and

recommends that habeas relief be granted. The trial court’s findings are supported by the record and

applicable law. Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The offense was a

misdemeanor and not a felony.

Relief is granted. The judgment in cause number 2020CR6864W in the 186th District Court

ofBexar County isset aside, and Applicant isremanded to the custody ofthe Sheriff ofBexar County

to answer the charges as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: January 13, 2021

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned President & Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certifies, that to their knowledge:

 

1)                             theCompany’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78*o*(d));and

 

2)                             theinformation contained in the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/Martin J.  Reid                            |                     | /s/William  J. Schmidt |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Martin J.  Reid                               | William J.  Schmidt      |
| President &  Chief Executive Officer | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                                          |                     |
| Date: May 4,  2005                       | Date: May 4,  2005  |

 

1

----
§ 876.5250 Urine collector and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* A urine collector and accessories is a device intended to collect urine. The device and accessories consist of tubing, a suitable receptacle, connectors, mechanical supports, and may include a means to prevent the backflow of urine or ascent of infection. The two kinds of urine collectors are: ( 1 ) A urine collector and accessories intended to be connected to an indwelling catheter, which includes the urinary drainage collection kit and the closed urine drainage system and drainage bag; and
( 2 ) A urine collector and accessories not intended to be connected to an indwelling catheter, which includes the corrugated rubber sheath, pediatric urine collector, leg bag for external use, urosheath type incontinence device, and the paste-on device for incontinence.
( b ) *Classification* — ( 1 ) *Class II (special controls) for a urine collector and accessories intended to be connected to an indwelling catheter.* The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 876.9.
( 2 ) *Class I (general controls).* For a urine collector and accessories not intended to be connected to an indwelling catheter, the device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9. If the device is not labeled or otherwise represented as sterile, it is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[48 FR 53023, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 59228, Nov. 3, 1998; 65 FR 2317, Jan. 14, 2000; 66 FR 38802, July 25, 2001; 73 FR 34860, June 19, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,099]


Seymour Tubing, Inc., Dunlap, TN; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated in response to a petition filed by a 
company official on June 9, 2009 on behalf of workers of Seymour 
Tubing, Inc., Dunlap, Tennessee.
    The petition is a duplicate of petition (TA-W-71,051) filed on June 
8, 2009, that is subject of an ongoing investigation. Therefore, 
further investigation in this case would serve no purpose and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th of July 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18054 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6181

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior

District Judge. (3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1)

Submitted: June 30, 2016 Decided: July 11, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Acting 

United States Attorney, William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-cr-00550-

MBS-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED