alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHBIIT 10.8

Note Extension of Barbara Green dated February 3, 2003




                             RESOLVE STAFFING, INC.
                      EXTENSION OF SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
                              DUE  FEBRUARY 3, 2003

Number:                  1

Principal  :  $     40,000


Original  Issue  Date:  June  3,  2002
                        --------------

Registered  Holder:          Barbara  Green
                             --------------
                                (name)


     WHEREAS,  Resolve  Staffing, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiary
Integra  Staffing,  Inc., a Florida corporation (collectively referred to as the
"Company")  with principal offices at 105 N. Falkenburg Road, Suite B, Tampa, FL
33619,  issued  a  promissory note to Barbara Green whose post office address is
5102 Redwillow Court, Tampa, Florida 33624 (the "Holder") dated June 3, 2002 and
due February 3, 2003 ("Maturity Date"), said note being secured by the Company's
accounts  receivable  and  interest  rate at 12% per annum, payable quarterly in
arrears.

     WHEREAS,  the Company wishes to extend the Maturity Date of the note for 90
days,  and  the  Holder whishes to provide the Company the opportunity to extend
the  note  for  said  period  under  the  following  conditions"

1.     The  Holder  hereby agrees to extend the maturity date of the note for an
initial  30-day  period  until  March  3,  2003.
2.     The Company hereby agrees to pay the Holder the accrued interest through
the original Maturity Date on or before March 3, 2003.
3.     Upon the agreed payment of the accrued interest by March 3, 2003, the
Holder hereby agrees to extend the maturity date for an additional 60-day period
until May 3, 2003.
4.     All of the other terms and conditions of the promissory note remain as
stated in the original note.

HOLDER

      /s/  Barbara  Green
By___________________________          Date:  2/3/03
      Barbara  Green

/s/  R.  Gale  Porter
_____________________________          Date:  2/3/03
Witness


<PAGE>
#### § 1.42-0T Table of contents.

This section lists the paragraphs contained in §§ 1.42-5T and 1.42-10T.

[T.D. 9755, 81 FR 11109, Mar. 3, 2016, as amended by T.D. 9848, 84 FR 6079, Feb. 26, 2019; T.D. 9850, 84 FR 7284, Mar. 4, 2019]
NO. 07-11-0138-CV 

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 AT AMARILLO 

 PANEL D 

 APRIL 18, 2011 

 ______________________________ 

 In re LUIS S. LAGAITE JR., 

 Relator 

 ______________________________ 

Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus 

______________________________ 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

 Pending before the trial court is the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Luis S. 

Lagaite, Jr. He asks us to order the Honorable Ana Estevez, Judge, 251st District Court, 

Potter County, to convene trial and enter a judgment in cause number 97,061-C 

pending in said court. Attached to the petition was an “Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion 

for Hearing and Motion for Trial” signed by the trial court on March 9, 2011. In it, the 

trial court observed that “...none of the defendants have been served in this case, and 

none have appeared.” Moreover, Lagaite did not dispute this determination through the 

petition filed with us. Given this, we cannot grant him the relief sought for neither a trial 

can begin against defendants nor final judgment be entered against them if they have 

yet to be served with citation. It is a matter of due process. 
2 

 Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

 Per Curiam
Exhibit
10.72


Summary
of the Cablevision CHOICE Excess Savings Plan


CSC Holdings, Inc.
maintains the Cablevision CHOICE Excess Savings Plan, which is an unfunded,
non-qualified retirement plan that operates in conjunction with the Company’s
tax-qualified Cablevision CHOICE 401(k) Savings Plan.  An employee is eligible to participate in the
Excess Savings Plan for a calendar year if his compensation in the preceding
year exceeded (or would have exceeded, if the employee had been employed for
the entire year) the Internal Revenue Code limit on the amount of compensation
that can be taken into account in determining contributions under tax-qualified
retirement plans ($220,000 in 2006) and he makes an election to participate
prior to the beginning of the year.  An
eligible employee whose contributions to the CHOICE 401(k) Plan are limited as
a result of this compensation limit or as a result of making the maximum 401(k)
contributions ($15,000 or $20,000 if 50 or over, for 2006) can continue to make
pre-tax deferrals under the Excess Savings Plan from his eligible pay that is
in excess of these limits, up to a maximum of 6% of his eligible pay, and the
Company will credit an Excess Savings Plan account for the employee with
matching contributions of up to 50% of the first 6% of eligible pay contributed
by the employee.  A participant is always
fully vested in the amount of his own deferrals and vests in the Company
matching allocations over five years (subject to full vesting upon death,
disability or retirement after attaining age 65). The Company credits each
Excess Savings Plan account with interest at the rate of return earned by the
stable value fund offered as an investment alternative under the CHOICE 401(k)
Plan.  Distributions are made in a lump
sum as soon as practicable after the participant’s termination of employment
with the Company and all affiliates.
<page>

                                                    EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS


I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the
<page> registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:  November 14, 2003       /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn
	Jeffrey D. Hahn
	Chief Financial Officer,
	Demeter Management Corporation,
	general partner of the registrant
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 20.2

[LETTERHEAD OF RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.]

April 15, 2002

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed is Retractable Technologies, Inc.'s ("Retractable's") 10-KSB for 2001.
Some of the highlights for 2001 and thus far in 2002 include:

..    The 1cc assembly equipment came on line during the first quarter of 2001.
..    Retractable's SB-2 was declared effective on May 3, 2001.
..    Retractable began trading on the AMEX the following day; the first company
     to begin trading directly on the AMEX with a self-underwritten initial
     public offering.
..    Sales for 2001 increased 67.5% over 2000 sales.
..    Gross margins improved to 17.5% of sales in 2001 from 8.6% of sales in
     2000.
..    Retractable received a Loan Agreement from Katie Petroleum, Inc. for $5
     million.
..    Royalties for 2001 in the amount of one million dollars were foregone by my
     wife and me in the first quarter of 2002. This transaction will be recorded
     in the first quarter of 2002 and is more fully described in the 10-KSB.
..    In April 2002 Retractable retained Halliburton Investor Relations of
     Dallas, Texas to, among other things, assist with "getting our story out"
     to the investment community.

Thank you for your continued interest and support of Retractable Technologies,
Inc.

Sincerely,

/s/ Thomas J. Shaw

Thomas J. Shaw
President and CEO
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7754 

To amend the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to add certain land to 

the Sarvis Creek Wilderness, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2024 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to add 

certain land to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sarvis Creek Wilder5 ness Completion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) SARVIS CREEK WILDERNESS ADDITION.— 

9 The term ‘‘Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition’’ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7754 IH

1 means the land added to the Sarvis Wilderness by 

2 the amendment made by section 3(a). 

3 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

4 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

5 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF SARVIS CREEK WILDERNESS AD6 DITION. 

7 (a) DESIGNATION.—Section 2(a)(11) of the Colorado 

8 Wilderness Act of 1993 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; Public Law 

9 103–77) is amended by striking ‘‘1993,’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘1993, and certain land within the Routt National Forest 

11 that comprises approximately 6,817 acres, as generally de12 picted as ‘Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition Proposal’ on 

13 the map entitled ‘Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition Pro14 posal’ and dated February 26, 2024,’’. 

15 (b) APPLICABLE LAW.—The reference in section 

16 4(d)(4) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(4)) to 

17 the effective date of that Act shall be considered to be 

18 a reference to the date of enactment of this Act for pur19 poses of administering the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addi20 tion. 

21 SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS. 

22 (a) TRIBAL RIGHTS AND USE.— 

23 (1) TREATY RIGHTS.—Nothing in this Act af24 fects the treaty rights of any Indian Tribe. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7754 IH

1 (2) TRADITIONAL TRIBAL USES.—The Sec2 retary may, in accordance with applicable law, per3 mit Indian Tribes access to, and use of, the Sarvis 

4 Creek Wilderness Addition for traditional, religious, 

5 and cultural purposes. 

6 (b) FIRE, INSECTS, AND DISEASES.—In accordance 

7 with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 

8 1133(d)(1)), the Secretary may carry out any activity in 

9 the Sarvis Creek Wilderness Addition that the Secretary 

10 determines to be necessary for the control of fire, insects, 

11 and diseases, subject to such terms and conditions as the 

12 Secretary determines to be appropriate. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 136

To refer S. 1325 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Horace Martin’’, to the

Chief Judge of the United States Claims Court for a report thereon.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. THURMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To refer S. 1325 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Horace

Martin’’, to the Chief Judge of the United States Claims

Court for a report thereon.

1 Resolved, That the bill (S. 1325) entitled ‘‘A bill for

2 the relief of Horace Martin’’, now pending in the Senate,

3 together with all accompanying papers, is referred to the

4 Chief Judge of the United States Claims Court. The Chief

5 Judge shall proceed with the same in accordance with the

6 provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United

7 States Code, and report back to the Senate, at the earliest

8 practicable date, giving such finding of fact and conclu9 sions that are sufficient to inform Congress of the amount,
2

SRES 136 IS

1 if any, legally or equitably due from the United States to

2 the claimant.

Æ
§ 1.456-4 Cessation of liability or existence. ( a ) If a taxpayer has elected to apply the provisions of section 456 to a trade or business in connection with which prepaid dues income is received, and if the taxpayer's liability to render services or make available membership privileges ends for any reason, as for example, because of the cancellation of a membership then so much of the prepaid dues income attributable to such liability as was not includible in the taxpayer's gross income under section 456 for preceding taxable years shall be included in gross income for the taxable year in which such liability ends. This paragraph shall not apply to amounts includible in gross income under § 1.456-7.
( b ) If a taxpayer which has elected to apply the provisions of section 456 ceases to exist, then the prepaid dues income which was not includible in gross income under section 456 for preceding taxable years shall be included in the taxpayer's gross income for the taxable year in which such cessation of existence occurs. This paragraph shall not apply to amounts includible in gross income under § 1.456-7.
( c ) If a taxpayer is a party to a transaction to which section 381(a) applies and the taxpayer's method of accounting with respect to prepaid dues income is used by the acquiring corporation under the provisions of section 381(c)(4), then neither the liability nor the existence of the taxpayer shall be deemed to have ended or ceased. In such cases see section 381(c)(4) and the regulations thereunder for the treatment of the portion of prepaid dues income which was not included in gross income under section 456 for preceding taxable years.
[T.D. 6937, 32 FR 16395, Nov. 30, 1967]
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 85

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning May 2, 1993, as

‘‘National Mental Health Counselors Week’’.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 85

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning May 2, 1993, as ‘‘National

Mental Health Counselors Week’’.

Whereas mental health counselors provide services along a

full continuum of care, including developmental and preventive services;

Whereas mental health counselors utilize individual and

group counseling techniques oriented toward assisting individuals with methods of problem solving, personal and

social development decision making, and the complex

process of developing self-understanding and making life

decisions;

Whereas mental health counselors work in conjunction with

other helping professionals, such a psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers, to determine the most appropriate counseling for each client;

Whereas mental health counselors work in psychiatric hospitals, community mental health agencies, private clinics,

college campuses, rehabilitation centers, and private practice;

Whereas mental health counselors are individuals upon

whom, by virtue of their education and extensive training,

heave been conferred masters or doctor of philosophy degrees in mental health counseling or community mental
2

SJ 85 ES

health counseling, or similar degree titles having a focus

on mental health; and

Whereas mental health counselors, after having earned such

degrees, have performed at least 2 years of supervised

clinical counseling, and are licensed or certified in the

State of their residence, or are certified by the Academy

of Clinical Mental Health Counselors: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week beginning May 2, 1993, is designated ‘‘Na4 tional Mental Health Counselors Week’’. The President is

5 requested to issue a proclamation calling upon all Govern6 ment agencies and the people of the United States to ob7 serve the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Passed the Senate April 27 (legislative day, April

19), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
Jeff Kyle, Clerk 

Third Court of Appeals 

P. 0. Box 12547 

Austin, TX 78711-2547 

M. ANGELA FREEMAN 

Official Court Reporter 

Bastrop County Court at Law 

804 Pecan Street 

Bastrop, TX 78602 

512.581.4040 Phone 

512.332.7291 fax 

freeman. maryange 1 a@gmai 1 . com 

August 19, 2015 

Re: Case No. 03-15-00391-CV 

VRM Vs. Edward Heard, et al 

Bastrop County, Texas 

Dear Mr. Kyle, 

This case is currently on appeal, and is due 8/24/15. 

Today I spoke with Appellants' counsel's office, The Minerve Law Firm 

regarding payment for the Reporter's Record. The law firm is needing to 

get in touch with the Appellants regarding the fee for this, therefore, 

I am requesting 30 days in order to secure a deposit and produce the record. 

I would respectfully request that I be given an extension of 30 days, or 

until September 21, 2015. 

Please let me know if there is anything else you need. 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 

Sincerely, 

M. Angela Freeman
I



# COMMONWEALTH ofVIRGINIA

D•>llglas W Domenech Secretory of Natural ResouJces 

### DEPARTMENT OF ElVVIROtVMEVTAL 

### QU LITV Slreet c.JCidreso;. 629 East Main Srreet. Richmond Virgini a 23219

1 \1/uilincr addreS
. \" P.O. Box 1105 Riehm nd. Vu·ginia 2.>218 Fa; (804) 698-4500 TDD (804) 698- 021 www.deq. virgin ia.gov

Ms. Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division (3APOO) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 ( 

### R Dav1d K Pa) lor DircctL11 i804) 698-401)0 1-800-592-5482


## FE l**~** 

## 2013

Reference: Withdrawal of Certain Portions ofthe SIP Submittal for Major Source Permits, Revision All Dear Ms. Esher: On August 25, 2011, Virginia officially requested approval from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of a revision to the Commonwealth ofVirginia State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision consisted primarily of amendments to major new source review permitting regulations for PSD and nonattainment areas (Articles 8 and 9 of 9VAC5 Chapter 80) as set out in 40 CFR 51.165 and 40 CFR 51.166. The amendments (i) establish the major source threshold, significant emissions rate, and offset ratios for particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2
.s), interpollutant trading for offsets and applicability ofNSR to PM2 . 5 precursors as promulgated by EPA on May 16, 2008 (73 FR 28321 ); and (ii) add maximum allowable increases in ambient pollutant concentrations (increments), significant impact levels (SILs), and a significant monitoring concentration (SMC) for PM2.s as promulgated by EPA on October 20, 2010 (75 FR 64864). EPA proposed approval ofthis submittal on August 1, 2012 (77 FR 45523). On January 22, 2013 the U.S. Court ofAppeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated and remanded to EPA policies establishing SILs for PM2 .5 except for the parts ofthe rule codifying PM2 .5 SILs in 40 CFR. § 51.165(b)(2). The court also found that EPA exceeded its Clean Air Act authority in establishing PM2
.s SMCs and vacated that rule as well. There is therefore no longer any underlying legal basis for the corresponding provisions in the Virginia rules. Therefore, the Commonwealth hereby requests to withdraw paragraph A(2) of section9V AC5-80-1715 and the exemption relating to PM2.5 at paragraph E(l) of sect ion 9VAC5-80- 1695 from the August 25 , 201 1 SlP submittal. I f you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know.

DKP\k.gs TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REGOOw SIP \MAJOR NSR\A IIw-SIP
. DOC

# ~:J9!f¥_ David K. Paylor
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60067

LOEWEN LOUISIANA HOLDINGS, INC., CENTRAL SERVICES DIVISION, Petitioner-Cross Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross Petitioner.

Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement

of an the National Labor Relations Board

(15-CA-15069)

December 13, 1999 Before JONES, BARKSDALE and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The court has considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral argument and pertinent portions of the record.

Having done so, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the NLRB’s determination that the petitioner’s supervisors are not within the purview of § 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act, and they were therefore properly included in
the bargaining unit. The NLRB’s order is A FFIRMED , and the bargaining order may be ENFORCED

.