alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          34,780
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,346,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,920,735
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,589,484
<PP&E>                                         632,502<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,245,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,367,181
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,144
<OTHER-SE>                                     429,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,245,854
<SALES>                                      2,828,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,828,318
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,691,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            116,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   116,494
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
<FN>
<F1>Property and equipment, net
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated August 28, 2009, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on September 8, 2009, (74 FR 46233), National Center for Natural Products Research-NIDA MProject, University of Mississippi, 135 Coy Waller Lab Complex, University, Mississippi 38677, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule I: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to cultivate marihuana for the National Institute on Drug Abuse for research approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of National Center for Natural Products Research-NIDA MProject to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated National Center for Natural Products Research-NIDA MProject to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: January 6, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-506 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned President &Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,that to their knowledge:

 

1)              the Company’s Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or78*o*(d)); and

 

2)              the information contained in theCompany’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

 

 
| /s/Martin J. Reid       |   | /s/William J. Schmidt   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Martin J. Reid          |   | William J. Schmidt      |   |
| Executive Chairman      |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |                    |   |
| Date: November 13, 2007 |   | Date: November 13, 2007 |   |
|                    |   |                    |   |

 

 

33

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.4
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Great Western Land and Recreation,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jay N. Torok, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Jay N. Torok
Jay N. Torok
Chairman of the Board
Principal Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
# C_2014462EN.01002901.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/29

---

Action brought on 3 November 2014 — Alpha Calcit v OHIM — Materis Paints Italia (CALCILITE)

(Case T-742/14)

(2014/C 462/42)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alpha Calcit Füllstoffgesellschaft mbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: F. Hauck, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Materis Paints Italia SpA (Novate Milanese, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark ‘CALCILITE’ — Community trade mark No 5 0 74  745

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 September 2014 in Case R 753/2013-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision with regard to the following goods: paints, varnishes, lacquers, preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood, colorants, mordants, raw natural resins (class 2); pargets (class 19); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision with regard to the following goods: paints, varnishes, lacquers, preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood, colorants, mordants, raw natural resins (class 2); pargets (class 19);

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 53(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 53(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2015-C, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2018 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2018.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 25th day of March, 2019.

 

March 25, 2019

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis |
|--------|--------|--------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis     |
|   | Title: | President          |

 

----
§ 1.1001-4 Modifications of certain derivative contracts. ( a ) *Certain assignments.* For purposes of § 1.1001-1(a), the transfer or assignment of a derivative contract is not treated by the nonassigning counterparty as a deemed exchange of the original contract for a modified contract that differs materially either in kind or in extent if— ( 1 ) Both the party transferring or assigning its rights and obligations under the derivative contract and the party to which the rights and obligations are transferred or assigned are either a dealer or a clearinghouse;
( 2 ) The terms of the derivative contract permit the transfer or assignment of the contract, whether or not the consent of the nonassigning counterparty is required for the transfer or assignment to be effective; and
( 3 ) The terms of the derivative contract are not otherwise modified in a manner that results in a taxable exchange under section 1001.
( b ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *Dealer.* For purposes of this section, a *dealer* is a taxpayer who meets the definition of a dealer in securities in section 475(c)(1) or is a dealer in commodities derivative contracts.
( 2 ) *Clearinghouse.* For purposes of this section, a *clearinghouse* is a derivatives clearing organization (as such term is defined in section 1a of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a)) or a clearing agency (as such term is defined in section 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a))) that is registered, or exempt from registration, under each respective Act.
( 3 ) *Derivative contract.* For purposes of this section, a *derivative contract* is a contract described in— ( i ) Section 475(c)(2)(D), 475(c)(2)(E), or 475(c)(2)(F) without regard to the last sentence of section 475(c)(2) referencing section 1256;
( ii ) Section 475(e)(2)(B), 475(e)(2)(C), or 475(e)(2)(D); or
( iii ) Section 1.446-3(c)(1).
( c ) *Consideration for the assignment.* Any payment between a party transferring or assigning its rights and obligations under the contract and the party to which the rights and obligations are transferred or assigned pursuant to a transfer or assignment described in paragraph (a) of this section will not affect the treatment of the nonassigning counterparty for purposes of this section. A payment described in the preceding sentence made or received to transfer or assign rights and obligations under a notional principal contract (as defined in § 1.446-3(c)(1)) is not subject to § 1.446-3(g)(4).
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to transfers or assignments of derivative contracts on or after July 22, 2011.
[T.D. 9639, 78 FR 66640, Nov. 6, 2013]
#### § 1.467-6 Section 467 rental agreements with contingent payments. [Reserved]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 22, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0054. JIMMIE LOU DIXON v. BEVERLY J. WRIGHT et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SUCV19CV000043
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 216 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 216

To express the sense of the Senate regarding breast and cervical cancer 
                               screening.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 25 (legislative day, May 16), 1994

 Mr. Murkowski (for himself, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Lugar, and Mr. Cochran) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                      on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To express the sense of the Senate regarding breast and cervical cancer 
                               screening.

Whereas mammography is the most reliable method of detecting the early onset of 
        breast cancer in women;
Whereas Pap smears are the most reliable method of detecting the onset of 
        cervical and uterine cancers in women;
Whereas 180,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer each year and 46,000 die 
        from the disease;
Whereas 45,500 women are diagnosed with cervical and uterine cancers each year 
        and 10,000 die from these diseases;
Whereas the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommend that women 
        have annual pelvic exams and Pap smears beginning at the age of 18 or 
        when a women becomes sexually active; and
Whereas the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American Cancer 
        Society, the American Medical Association, and the American Medical 
        Womens' Association recommend that women between the ages of 40 and 50 
        have mammograms every 1 to 2 years: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that any comprehensive 
health care reform measures passed by the Senate contain provisions 
that maintain that early detection and preventative screening for 
breast and cervical cancers not be artificially limited by Federal 
mandates, but be provided in a manner consistent with sound scientific 
research, allowing for physician discretion.

                                      <all>
```
131 STAT. 86 PUBLIC LAW 115–20—APR. 3, 2017 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res 69: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Feb. 16, considered and passed House. 

Mar. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–20 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior relating to ‘‘Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska’’. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior 

relating to ‘‘Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in 

Alaska’’ (81 Fed. Reg. 52247 (August 5, 2016)), and such rule 

shall have no force or effect. 

Approved April 3, 2017. 

Apr. 3, 2017 

[H.J. Res. 69] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Gary M. DeLaurentiis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Itec
Environmental Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I, are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 5, 2004.

/s/  Gary M. De Laurentiis
--------------------------
Gary M. De Laurentiis
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Ebix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobinRaina, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| By:                     | /s/ Robin Raina |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|                    |            |
| Name:                   | Robin Raina     |   |
|                    |            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |            |
|                    |            |
| November 11, 2005  |            |
|                         |                 |        |  |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 97-40353

Summary Calendar 

_________________________________

OLEN HYDEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(B-94-CV-227)

______________________________________________________

January 7, 1998

O R D E R

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

The opinion in this case originally filed on December 11, 1997

is withdrawn and the attached opinion is substituted in its place.

Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Appellee in this age discrimination action

brought under the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. After reviewing

the record, we agree with the district court that Appellant failed

to produce summary judgment evidence that created a genuine issue

of material fact supporting Appellant’s claim that he was

terminated because of his age. We therefore AFFIRM the district

court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 473

_____________________________
P ATRICK H AWKINS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jefferson County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

. July 3, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W ETHERELL , B ILBREY , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Patrick Hawkins, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.