alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HealthChoice, Inc.  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed  with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
 Dr. J. W. Stucki, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant
 to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as adopted pursuant to S 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
 of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

           (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements of  Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)  The information contained in  the Report fairly presents,  in
           all material  respects,  the  financial condition  and  result  of
           operations of the Company.



 /s/ Dr. J. W. Stucki

 Dr. J. W. Stucki
 Chief Executive Officer

 August 20, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,477
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,288
<INVENTORY>                                      4,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,544
<PP&E>                                          14,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,577
<BONDS>                                         98,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,549
<SALES>                                         69,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,535
<CGS>                                           25,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,679
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                       931
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                262
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY HAS NOT DISCLOSED EPS AS THERE IS NO PUBLIC MARKET FOR ITS
COMMON EQUITY. HOWEVER, THE COMPANY DOES HAVE PUBLICLY TRADED SENIOR UNSECURED
NOTES. 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
39294.

#### HORNE v. THE STATE

Decided January 16, 1962.

*Guy B. Scott, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Preston M. Almand, Solicitor,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

The undisputed evidence in this case disclosed that the defendant, who was driving an automobile in a westerly direction in the outside lane of Prince Avenue, a four-lane street in the City of Athens, suddenly turned the vehicle into the inside lane in front of the automobile being operated by the State’s witness, Duard Nunnally, striking the right front bumper of Nunnally’s automobile. The defendant without stopping at the scene of the collision turned right at the next intersection and proceeded out of sight of the witness Nunnally. Approximately 5 to 10 minutes later Nunnally again observed the automobile which had collided with his vehicle. The defendant was sitting in the front seat of said automobile but was not under the wheel. Upon confrontation, however, the defendant admitted that he had been driving at the time of the collision, and pleaded with Nunnally not to call the law. Nunnally testified that at the time he confronted the defendant, which was approximately 5 to' 10 minutes after he had seen the defendant driving the automobile, the defendant was in a state of intoxication which rendered him unsafe to operate a motor vehicle. This testimony as to intoxication was supported by that of two other witnesses, including the investigating officer.

While it is strongly contended by counsel for the defendant that the State failed to establish the corpus delicti in this case, it is our opinion that under the facts and circumstances set out above, the defendant’s operation of the vehicle in the manner described, and his observed intoxication shortly thereafter, were sufficient to authorize his conviction for the offense of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

*215The cases of *Gunder v. State,*95 Ga. App. 176 (97 SE2d 381), and *Waters v. State,*90 Ga. App. 329 (83 SE2d 25), relied upon by the defendant, are easily distinguished from the instant case. In the *Gunder*case, supra, there was no evidence to show the lapse of time between the defendant’s observed intoxication and his operation of the motor vehicle; and in the *Waters*case, supra, the defendant, after striking 'a parked car with his automobile, parked his own vehicle and left the scene for some 15 to 20 minutes, and while he was under the influence of liquor when he returned to his automobile, he did not appear to be intoxicated at the time he left.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 29, 2021 No. 04-20-00359-CV Brandon HJELLA , Appellant
v. RED MCCOMBS MOTORS, LTD ,

Appellee From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI15792 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The appellant's brief is due on or before February 2, 2021. No further extensions, absent extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8066 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8066

   To require a report on the United States supply of nitrocellulose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2024

 Mr. Emmer (for himself, Mr. Stauber, Mrs. Fischbach, Mr. Finstad, Mr. 
 Crawford, and Mr. Westerman) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require a report on the United States supply of nitrocellulose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ammunition Supply Chain Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON UNITED STATES SUPPLY OF NITROCELLULOSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Congress remains concerned about the domestic supply 
        and production of nitrocellulose.
            (2) Any failure or supply shortage could restrict 
        ammunition manufacturing for large and small calibers, harming 
        the commercial marketplace and placing the war fighters at 
        risk.
    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall 
        submit to Congress a report on the United States supply chain 
        for smokeless gunpowder, including nitrocellulose, 
        nitroglycerin, and acid production, essential to ammunition 
        manufacturing.
            (2) Scope.--The report required under paragraph (1) should 
        address the following topics:
                    (A) Improving the sourcing of smokeless gunpowder 
                necessary for the production of ammunition, including 
                nitrocellulose, nitroglycerin, and acid production.
                    (B) Protecting against single points of failure 
                across ammunition supply chain facilities, including 
                primary and secondary locations.
                    (C) Reducing the risk of disruptions caused by 
                global demand for ammunition and ammunition smokeless 
                powder across commercial and non-commercial markets.
                    (D) Utilizing the private and commercial sector's 
                sourcing, manufacturing, and production capacity and 
                expertise to the greatest extent practicable to broaden 
                points of production and private sector investment.
                                 <all>
```
Amended and Restated Revolving Note



 
Exhibit
10.81 
 
AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING
NOTE 
 

	 $5,000,000.00
	 	 February 3, 2003


 
For
value received, the undersigned, RF Monolithics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay on the Termination Date under the Credit Agreement (defined below), to the order of WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., a
national banking association (the “Lender”), at its main office in Minneapolis, Minnesota, or at any other place designated at any time by the holder hereof, in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available
funds, the principal sum of FIVE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($5,000,000.00) or, if less, the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Revolving Advances made by the Lender to the Borrower under the Credit Agreement (defined below) together with
interest on the principal amount hereunder remaining unpaid from time to time, computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a 360-day year, from the date hereof until this Revolving Note is fully paid at the rate from time to time
in effect under the Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement of even date herewith (as the same may hereafter be amended, supplemented or restated from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) by and between the Lender and the
Borrower. The principal hereof and interest accruing thereon shall be due and payable as provided in the Credit Agreement. This Revolving Note may be prepaid only in accordance with the Credit Agreement. 
 
This Revolving Note is issued pursuant, and is subject, to the
Credit Agreement, which provides, among other things, for acceleration hereof. This Revolving Note is the Revolving Note referred to in the Credit Agreement. This Revolving Note is secured, among other things, pursuant to the Credit Agreement and
the Security Documents as therein defined, and may now or hereafter be secured by one or more other security agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust, assignments or other instruments or agreements. 
 
The Borrower hereby agrees to pay all costs of collection,
including attorneys’ fees and legal expenses in the event this Revolving Note is not paid when due, whether or not legal proceedings are commenced. 
 
Presentment or other demand for payment, notice of acceleration, notice of intent to accelerate, notice of dishonor and protest and all
other notices of any kind are expressly waived. 
 
This Note is given in amendment, restatement and modification, but not in extinguishment or novation, of the indebtedness evidenced by that certain Revolving Note in the principal amount of $8,500,000.00, dated December 8, 2000,
executed by the Borrower and payable to the order of the Lender. 
 

	 RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/ David M. Kirk


	 	 	 David M. Kirk
 President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          24,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,383
<PP&E>                                             565
<DEPRECIATION>                                      31
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,948
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,209)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Gary De Laurentiis, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Itec Environmental Group, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 August 20, 2004
 
 Gary De LaurentiisPrincipal Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 189 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 189

  Congratulating Bowdoin College on the occasion of its bicentennial 
                              anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 11 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

   Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Cohen) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating Bowdoin College on the occasion of its bicentennial 
                              anniversary.

Whereas Bowdoin College was established in 1794 by the General Court of the 
        Commonwealth of Massachusetts as the first college in the District of 
        Maine;
Whereas, since 1802, Bowdoin College has educated students from Maine, the rest 
        of the Nation, and many foreign countries on the principle that: 
        ``literary institutions are founded and endowed for the common good and 
        not for the private advantage of those who resort to them for 
        education'';
Whereas alumni of Bowdoin College have included 1 President of the United 
        States, 16 Members of the Senate, 42 Members of the House of 
        Representatives, 2 Supreme Court Justices, and many other public 
        officials;
Whereas other distinguished alumni of Bowdoin College have included authors 
        Nathaniel Hawthorne and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Civil War hero and 
        the Governor of Maine Joshua Chamberlain, Arctic explorer Admiral Robert 
        E. Peary, and Olympic gold medalist Joan Benoit Samuelson; and
Whereas Bowdoin College is consistently named one of the Nation's most 
        outstanding liberal arts colleges: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the contributions made by Bowdoin College to 
        the State of Maine and the Nation over the past 200 years;
            (2) extends heartiest congratulations to the students, 
        alumni, faculty, staff, and administrators of this great 
        institution of higher learning on the occasion of its 
        bicentennial anniversary; and
            (3) offers best wishes for the continued success of Bowdoin 
        College in the future.

                                 <all>
```
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:  	/s/ Walter Davis

Name:		    Walter Davis
Title:	    President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			    the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		    August 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 108 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 206

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. RES. 108

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 To refer S. 974 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Richard Kanehl of 
  Mobile, Alabama.'' to the chief judge of the United States Court of 
                  Federal Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 206
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 108

 To refer S. 974 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Richard Kanehl of 
  Mobile, Alabama.'' to the chief judge of the United States Court of 
                  Federal Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 18 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

Mr. Mitchell (for Mr. Heflin) submitted the following resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                Reported by Mr. Biden, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To refer S. 974 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Richard Kanehl of 
  Mobile, Alabama.'' to the chief judge of the United States Court of 
                  Federal Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved, That the bill S. 974 entitled ``A bill for the relief of 
Richard Kanehl of Mobile, Alabama.'' now pending in the Senate, 
together with all the accompanying papers, is referred to the chief 
judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The chief judge 
shall proceed with the same in accordance with the provisions of 
sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code, and report 
thereon to the Senate, at the earliest practicable date, giving such 
findings of fact and conclusions thereon as shall be sufficient to 
inform the Congress of the nature and character of the demand as a 
claim, legal or equitable, against the United States or a gratuity and 
the amount, if any, legally or equitably due to the claimants from the 
United States.
```