alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2015 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 26, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Principal Plus Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,957,043
<SECURITIES>                                42,567,265
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,721,781<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,721,781<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,171,484<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,171,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,941,272<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,941,272
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,941,272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, securities and receivables, total assets
include net unrealized gain on open contracts of $2,164,295.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $2,001,215, accrued
brokerage fees of $175,032, accrued administrative expenses of $212,056,
accrued management fee of $43,758 and incentive fee payable of $33,426.
<F3>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $2,407,913, net
change in unrealized of $1,384,863, interest income of $2,168,276 and
change in valuation of Yield Pool of $210,432.
<F4>Income-Pretax, Income Continuing and Net Income includes minority
interest in income of $58,725.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
!"#$%&'(&(•#)*+,-%**%-.•&''/%#,-0$1•/23•&/3,#•(43%%,#%5•#-%##5*%6•7"&80+9!.#&$%&'((,:4'3+7597.";&6/,-,*<,5#*-#:(''*5=,*+%&''$>&'('.&!"#$%&&'(?@%%*%*%)*+7*5>"#>0'4'6(-A>-8//062,,>7,,&'&/60>8/6(->78/6(B>#57==6$7*#*&&6/=,-•"+";&6/.C&6/•B**C%*%%*•9*C%1%%%•;8.%*'-•<*%*,•B";&6/+%.•B";&6/#+%%*%-.//01.%*'02D###,<+%#.";%%#%*-%%*6E!"##$%&'&2)3$3(•(44$)**%(•,,-#+-.•&''0),,%F9!G*<A•&''$)7#-%*#•"$7+!;H.•&''$)H9#*%%-#•#C*I,*•6&''$)7%9!,##045•DeployedDataRAM4000–Nephelometry–real-timePM2.5(smokeindicator)–complaintlocation(nearfield)100ft–Controllocation(reference)2,600ft–Nootherobvioussubstantialsourcesnearby•Meteorologicalstation(realtime)•1weekmonitoringperiod(time-syncedinstruments)•Observationlogsandsitevisits$#69J9JC9!B9JC9!B

( m c g / m 3 )4( m c g / m 3 )('BC657.%*'4@K";L<K";L•";&6/##**I-#M*•";&6/#,*,,,<,#,,9!–,,)#*";&6/#,06/*5=*–N,)#*";&6/#,'622*5=*(()$589($589(O;(=6=46(;'6$'60;(0&6/$'645•;*#*";&6/#M#--,•#*";&6/#%-•H*<";&6/-,##•*-,*#(&•!-%-,";&6/<9#*-•*%M,-•9,-9!+*/<>.–";&6/#*#/2*9!#+≤'6'(.–,,,+*.,,#";&6/#):43))55,,,666*#5#555,5):40))55,,,666*#55/(4$26(=
#### § 1.453A-2 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 94 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 94

 To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9, 1993, as 
                  ``National Customer Service Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 18 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

  Mr. Dole (for himself and Mrs. Kassebaum) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9, 1993, as 
                  ``National Customer Service Week''.

Whereas recognition of the value and importance of the customer raises the 
        quality of customer service;
Whereas the high cost of attracting new customers today heightens the need for 
        companies to keep existing customers through effective customer service;
Whereas recognition of the contributions made by customer service to the 
        profitability of a company increases the professional status of customer 
        service;
Whereas excellent customer service distinguishes successful companies that 
        understand the important influence a customer has on the success of a 
        company; and
Whereas excellent customer service can contribute to the growth and success of 
        every company: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of October 3, 
1993, through October 9, 1993, is designated as ``National Customer 
Service Week''. The President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe the 
week with the appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,193,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     295,616,335
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,410,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             292,221,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   246,321,997
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,687,292)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               292,221,713
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,714,877
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,170,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             554,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,227,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,227,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,227,531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1><F2>
<FN>
<F1>Current Assets and Current Liabilities are not separated to conform
with industry standards.
<F2>Income is from rental income. There are no Sales or Cost of Goods Sold.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the three months
of which the quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the three months covered by this
quarterly report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants three months
then ended that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2006/s/ Daniel J. ReganDaniel J. ReganVice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Great Western Land and Recreation, Inc.
# C_2014253EN.01005701.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/57

---

Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Gasiber 2000 v Commission

(Case T-428/14)

2014/C 253/76

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gasiber 2000, SL (Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. García Muñoz, J. Jiménez-Blanco Carrillo de Albornoz and J. Corral García, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision; and

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs incurred in the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs incurred in the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-392/14 Gutser v Commission.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Draft environmental impactstatement for travel management on the Coconino National Forest, Coconino andYavapai Counties, Arizona [electronic resource].**
 - Full Document (3.35MB .pdf     file)Figure 2 Existing (2.5MB .pdf     file)Figure 3 Alternative 1 (2.3MB     .pdf file)Figure 4 Alternative 3 (1.8MB     .pdf file)Figure 5 Alternative 4     (1.87MB .pdf file) 
 
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.92:C 64/5/DRAFT
Item Number:0080-F (online)
CGP systemNumber:000753902
 
August 13, 2019
#### CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF MINNESOTA v. THE UNITED STATES

[No. H-155.

Decided November 14, 1938;

supplemental opinion January 9, 1939, *ante,*p. 1]

*[Affirmed*April 17, 1939.

307 U. S. 1]

*631Mr. Justice Eoberts

delivered the opinion of the Court.
#### § 1.182-4 Definition of “land suitable for use in farming”, etc.

For purposes of section 182, the term *land suitable for use in farming* means land which, as a result of the land clearing activities described in paragraph (a) of § 1.182-3, could be used by the taxpayer or his tenant for the production of crops, fruits, or other agricultural products, including fish, or for the sustenance of livestock. The term *livestock* includes cattle, hogs, horses, mules, donkeys, sheep, goats, captive fur-bearing animals, chickens, turkeys, pigeons, and other poultry. Land used for the sustenance of livestock includes land used for grazing such livestock. Expenditures are considered to be for the purpose of making land suitable for use in farming by the taxpayer or his tenant only if made to prepare the land which is cleared for use by the taxpayer or his tenant in farming. Thus, if the taxpayer pays or incurs expenditures to clear land for the purpose of sale (whether or not for use in farming by the purchaser) or to be held by the taxpayer or his tenant other than for use in farming, section 182 does not apply to such expenditures. Whether the land is cleared for the purpose of making it suitable for use in farming by the taxpayer or his tenant, is a question of fact which must be resolved on the basis of all the relevant facts and circumstances. For purposes of section 182, it is not necessary that the land cleared actually be used in farming following the clearing activities. However, the fact that following the clearing operation, the land is used by the taxpayer or his tenant in the business of farming will, in most cases, constitute evidence that the purpose of the clearing was to make land suitable for use in farming by the taxpayer or his tenant. On the other hand, if the land cleared is sold or converted to nonfarming use soon after the taxpayer has completed his clearing activities, there will be a presumption that the expenditures were not made for the purpose of making the land suitable for use in farming by the taxpayer or his tenant. Other factors which will be considered in determining the taxpayer's purpose for clearing the land are, for example, the acreage, location, and character of the land cleared, the nature of the taxpayer's farming operation, and the use to which adjoining or nearby land is put.

[T.D. 6794, 30 FR 791, Jan. 26, 1965]
Exhibit 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)

AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dennis E. Bunday, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/ DENNIS E. BUNDAY

Dennis E. Bunday

Chief Financial Officer

Williams Controls, Inc.

May 11, 2006
# C_2017104EN.01004201.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Holistic Innovation Institute v REA

(Case T-706/14) (1)

1

((Research and technological development - Projects funded by the European Union in the field of research - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - ZONeSEC and Inachus projects - Decision refusing participation of the applicant - Action for annulment and liability))

(2017/C 104/58)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU (Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain) (represented initially by R. Muñiz García and subsequently by J. Marín López, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Research Executive Agency (represented by: S. Payan-Lagrou and V. Canetti, acting as Agents, and by J. Rivas, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application based on Article 264 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision of the REA of 24 July 2014 [ARES (2014) 2461172], terminating negotiations and rejecting the participation of the applicant in the European projects Inachus and ZONeSEC and, second, application based on Article 268 TFEU and seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of its exclusion from participation in the said projects and from the communication of certain information concerning the applicant following that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU to pay the costs in the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU to pay the costs in the present proceedings;

| 3. | Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 421, 24.11.2014.

1

---
Filed 3/13/ 15 P. v. Snyder CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

R YAN ANTHONY SNYDER,

Defendant and Appellant. B260959

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. YA043498)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Alan B.

Honeycutt, Judge. Dismissed.

Ryan Anthony Snyder, in pro. per.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.2

Defendant, Ryan Anthony Snyder , purports to appeal from an order denying his

motion to vacate the judgment. The gravamen of defendant ’ s papers filed in the trial

court resemble s a habeas corpus petition

. We recognized the order under review may not

be appealable. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction on our own

motion. ( Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35

Cal.3d 390, 398 .) Hence, we issued an order to show cause and calendared the matter of

argument which was waived.

The denial of a motion to vacate the judgment is, under our circumstances,

nonappealable. ( People v. Banks (1959) 53 Cal.2d 370, 378; People v. Gallardo (2000)

77 Cal.App.4th 971, 980.) In many respects , defendant ’ s paperwork bears a remarkable

resemblance to a habeas corpus petition. The denial of a habeas corpus petition is not

appealable. ( In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767, fn. 7; In re Hochberg (1970) 2 Cal.3d

870, 876, disapproved on other grounds in In re Fields (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1063, 1070, fn.

3.) Thus, the order under review is not appealable.

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

TURNER, P. J.

We conc ur:

MOSK, J.

KRIEGLER, J.