alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016392EN.01003001.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Herbert Smith Freehills v Commission

(Case T-755/14) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to discussions preceding the adoption of the directive on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of legal advice - Rights of the defence - Overriding public interest))

(2016/C 392/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Herbert Smith Freehills LLP (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Wytinck, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel, J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Rebasti, J. Herrmann and M. Veiga, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision Gestdem 2014/2070 of 24 September 2014 refusing access to certain documents relating to the adoption of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC (OJ 2014 L 127, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Herbert Smith Freehills LLP to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Herbert Smith Freehills LLP to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2015.

1

---
Order entered January 20, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-19-01264-CV

MACY’S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., Appellant

V.

AUDON BENAVIDES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-10796



### ORDER

Before the Court is the December 27, 2019 request of court repo rter Terri Etekochay for

an extension of time to fil e the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and extend the time to

January 3, 2020 . We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Tina

Thompson, Official Court Reporter for the 134th Judicial Distri ct Court; Ms. Etekochay; and, all

parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania :

:

v. :

:

Craig Campbell, :

Appellant : No. 1962 C.D. 2013

O R D E R

NOW, August 28, 2014, having considered appellant’s “motion for 

application of reconsideration order”, the application is denied.

_____________________________

DAN PELLEGRINI, 

President Judge
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 242

Honoring the 14 Federal firefighters who died while fighting a wildfire near

Glenwood Springs, Colorado.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 13 (legislative day, JULY 11), 1994

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr. REID, Mr.

BRYAN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr. BURNS, Mr. PACKWOOD,

Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. BUMPERS, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. MATHEWS,

Mr. BROWN, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr.

KEMPTHORNE, Mr. DOLE, and Mr. STEVENS) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 20, 1994

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Honoring the 14 Federal firefighters who died while fighting

a wildfire near Glenwood Springs, Colorado.

Whereas on July 6, 1994, 14 Federal firefighters from the

United States Forest Service and the Bureau of Land

Management perished while heroically fighting a raging

wildfire on Storm King Mountain near Glenwood

Springs, Colorado;

Whereas the firefighters died when they were overswept by a

wildfire whipped by high and erratic winds;
2

•SRES 242 ATS

Whereas the 14 firefighters who gave their lives were Kathi

J. Beck, hot shot crewmember, Prineville, Oregon, Tamara J. Bickett, hot shot crewmember, Prineville, Oregon, Scott A. Blecha, hot shot crewmember, Prineville,

Oregon, Levi Brinkley, hot shot crewmember, Prineville,

Oregon, Robert Browning, helitack, Grand Junction, Colorado, Douglas Dunbar, hot shot crewmember, Prineville,

Oregon, Terri A. Hagen, hot shot crewmember,

Prineville, Oregon, Bonnie J. Holtby, hot shot crewmember, Prineville, Oregon, Robert A. Johnson, hot shot

crewmember, Prineville, Oregon, Jon R. Kelso, hot shot

squad leader, Prineville, Oregon, Donald Mackey,

smokejumper, Missoula, Montana, Roger Roth,

smokejumper, McCall, Idaho, James Thrash,

smokejumper, McCall, Idaho, and Richard Tyler,

helitack, Grand Junction, Colorado; and

Whereas these brave men and women gave their lives in an

attempt to protect American lives, property, and natural

resources: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors, and will always re2 member, the 14 Federal firefighters who died on July 6,

3 1994, for their heroic efforts in trying to contain a fire

4 on Storm King Mountain near Glenwood Springs, Colo5 rado, in order to protect American lives, property, and

6 natural resources.

Æ
#### § 1.268-1 Items attributable to an unharvested crop sold with the land.

In computing taxable income no deduction shall be allowed in respect of items attributable to the production of an unharvested crop which is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted with the land and which is considered as property used in the trade or business under section 1231(b)(4). Such items shall be so treated whether or not the taxable year involved is that of the sale, exchange, or conversion of such crop and whether they are for expenses, depreciation, or otherwise. If the taxable year involved is not that of the sale, exchange, or conversion of such crop, a recomputation of the tax liability for such year shall be made; such recomputation should be in the form of an “amended return” if necessary. For the adjustments to basis as a result of such disallowance, see section 1016(a)(11) and the regulations thereunder.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

December 31, 2002

Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation
10511 East Central Avenue
Wichita, Kansas  67206

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is delivered pursuant to Section 14(B)(31) of that certain
Restructuring Agreement dated as of December 31, 2002 (the "Restructuring
Agreement") by and between Raytheon Aircraft Credit Corporation ("RACC") and
Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. ("Great Lakes") and is for the benefit of RACC.

The undersigned agrees not to (i) transfer any shares of capital stock of Great
Lakes or any options to purchase shares of capital stock of Great Lakes that the
undersigned now holds or may hereafter acquire before December 31, 2005 or (ii)
purchase any additional shares of capital stock of Great Lakes before December
31, 2005; provided, however, that this letter may be released as provided in
Section 14(B)(31) of the Restructuring Agreement.

Best regards,

--------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

IRS redesignated the following sections to appear below the undesignated center heading “Regulations Applicable to Certain Bonds Sold Prior to July 8, 1997” and preceding the undesignated center heading “Deductions for Personal Exemptions.” See 62 FR 25507 and 25513, May 9, 1997 for the specific sections involved in the redesignation.

#### § 1.404(a)-11 Trusts created or organized outside the United States; application of section 404(a)(4).

In order that a trust may constitute a qualified trust under section 401(a) and be exempt under section 501(a), it must be created or organized in the United States and maintained at all times as a domestic trust. See paragraph (a) of § 1.401-1. Paragraph (4) of section 404(a) provides, however, that an employer which is a resident, a corporation, or other entity of the United States, making contributions to a foreign stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing trust, shall be allowed deductions for such contributions, under the applicable conditions and within the prescribed limits of section 404(a), if such foreign trust would qualify for exemption under section 501(a) except for the fact that it is a trust created, organized, or maintained outside the United States. Moreover, if a nonresident alien individual, foreign corporation, or other entity is engaged in trade or business within the United States and makes contributions to a foreign stock bonus, pension, or profit-sharing trust, which would qualify under section 401(a) and be exempt under section 501(a) except that it is created, organized, or maintained outside the United States, such contributions are deductible subject to the conditions and limitations of section 404(a) and to the extent allowed by section 873 or 882(c).

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11689, Nov. 26, 1960]
Exhibit 10(a)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment
No. 6 to Registration Statement No. 333-68879 of Merrill Lynch Large Cap Growth
V.I. Fund of Mercury V.I. Funds, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form N-1A of our report
dated February 20, 2003, appearing in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report of the
Fund, in the Statement of Additional Information which is part of this
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the caption
"Financial Highlights" in the Prospectus, which is also part of this
Registration Statement.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Princeton, New Jersey
April 14, 2003
427 A.2d 1214

#### Commonwealth v. Matson, Appellant.

Argued November 12, 1979.

Jay Y. Rubin, for appellant;

Walter S. Vuckovick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, CAVANAUGH and WATKINS, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed on the opinion of Judge Earley of the court below.
IN IT I AL REVI EW ENG I NEERI NG REPORT PMN : 15 - 0 15 0 Focu s Ready Draft 1 /26/20 1 5 ENG I N EER : PV ( kg /yr) :SAT (concern s) (0 1 / 1 6/2015) : Re l ated A

n a l ogs : Migrat i PB T ra ti ng : P 1B 1T2 H

ea l th : 1 - 2 Dermal, I nha l a t ion E co : 2 Wate r (All re l eases t o wat er wi t h a CC OCCU PAT I ONAL EX POS U RE RAT I NG : 1 - 2A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTI ONS : 10 ppb)IN IT I AL REVI E W ENG I NEERI NG REPORT PMN : Braskem LaPorte INEOS Lis l e IL Days/yr : 240 TX 77571 60532 2

ENV I RONMENTAL R ELEASES ESTIMATE S UMMARY IRER Note : The da il y relea ses li s t ed f o r any source below may co i ncide with dail y rele ases fr om the other sour ces to the same medium . A i r rel eases are no t assesed below because VP < 0 . 0 1 torr.Wat er or I ncinerat i on o r Lan d f il l H

igh En d : 6 . 2E - 2 kg/s it e - day over 2 4 0 days/yr f r om 2 s i tes s i te - yr fr om 2 s i tes or 3 . 0E +l kg/y r - a l l s i tes

Wat er or I ncinerat i on o r Lan d f il l Ce n tral Tendency : 1 . 5E - 3 kg/s i te - day over 4 days/yr fr om 2 s i tes o r 5 . 8 E- 3 s i te - yr fr om 2 s i tes or 1 . 2E - 2 kg/y r - a l l s i tes

Ai r Typ i cal : 3 . 4E- 8 k g/s i te - day over 240 days/yr f rom 2 sites o r 8 . 3 E- 6 kg/s i te - yr fr om 2 s i tes or 1 . 7E - 5 kg/y r - a l l s i tes Wo r st Case : 6 . 9E - 8 kg/site - day over 240 days/yr from 2 s i tes

- 5 kg/s i te - yr fr om 2 s i tes or 3 . 3E - 5 kg/y r - a l l s i tes

R

ELEAS E TOTAL 3 . 0E + l kg/yr - al l s i tes OCC UPAT I O N

AL EXPOS U RES ES TIMATE S U MMARY Tot . # o f wo r ke r s exposed via assessed rou t es : 6 Bas i s : The s u bmi ss i on estimates 2 wo rkers pote n t i al l y exposed over a l l site . CEB assesses a de f aul t m i nimum of 3 wor ke r s/s it e .Inha l a ti on : Exposu r e to Vapo r (volat il e) (C l ass I I) Typica l: >Potent i a l Dose Rate : 1 . 7E- 5 mg/day over 240 days/yr > Li fe time Average Daily Dose : 8 . 9E - 8 mg/ kg - day over 240 days/y r >Aver age Dai l y Dose : 1 . 6E - 7 mg/day over 240 days/yr >Acu t e Potent i al Dose : 2 . 4E- 7 mg/day over 240 days/y r Wors t Case : > Potent i a l Dose Rate : 9 . 9E- 4 mg/day over 240 days/yr > Li fe time Average Daily Dose : 5 . 3E - 6 mg/ kg - day over 240 days/y r > Aver age Dai l y Dose : 9 . 3E- 6 mg/day over 240 days/yr >Acu t e Potent i al Dose : 1 . 4E- 5 mg/day over 240 days/y r Number o f wo r ke r s (a ll s i tes) with i nhal ation exposur e : 6

INHALAT I ON MONI TOR I NG DATA REVI EW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on mode l, o r data no t specifi c t o i ndustry) : 2)a) Exposu r e l eve l > 1 mg/day? regulatory lim it , Yes No OR b) H azard Rating f or heal t h of 2 or great er? 1 - 2 = > I nhal at i on Moni tor i ng Dat a Des i red? No Dermal : Exposu r e to Li quid at 100 . 00% concentr at i on H

igh End : > Po t ent ia l Dose Rat e : 2 . 2E + 3 mg/day ove r 240 day s/yr No

> Lifetime Ave r age Da il y Dose : 1 . 2 E+ 1 mg/day over 240 days/yr >Aver age Dai l y Dose : 2 . 1 E+1 mg/day over 240 days/yr > Acu t e Potent i al Dose : 3 . 2 E+ 1 mg/day over 240 days/y r Number o f wo r ke r s (a ll s i tes) with de r ma l e
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 187

To authorize the production of records by the Select Committee on

Intelligence.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 8 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize the production of records by the Select

Committee on Intelligence.

Whereas the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania has requested, through the United States Attorney, that the Select Committee on Intelligence make available to the Court for in camera inspection a transcript of testimony received by the Committee

in closed session to determine the relevance of the transcript to the case of United States v. Robert Clyde Ivy,

Cr. No. 91–602–04, pending in that court;

Whereas by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken
2

SRES 187 ATS

from such control or possession but by permission of the

Senate; and

Whereas when it appears that documents, papers, and

records under the control or in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate

will take such action as will promote the ends of justice

consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Chairman and Vice Chairman of

2 the Select Committee on Intelligence, acting jointly, are

3 authorized to provide to the United States District Court

4 for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in accordance

5 with appropriate security procedures, the closed session

6 transcript which the court has requested.

Æ
Order entered December 31, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00917-CR

FAUSTINO VALDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-00331-P

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Lisabeth Kellett’s December 27, 2018 second request 

for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the 

reporter’s record filed within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
§ 1.32-2 Earned income credit for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1978. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Limitations.* ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) *Married individuals.* No credit is allowed by section 32 in the case of an eligible individual who is married (within the meaning of section 7703 and the regulations thereunder) unless the individual and spouse file a single return jointly (a joint return) for the taxable year (see section 6013 and the regulations thereunder relating to joint returns of income tax by husband and wife). The requirements of the preceding sentence do not apply to an eligible individual who is not considered as married under section 7703(b) and the regulations thereunder (relating to certain married individuals living apart).
( 3 ) *Length of taxable year.* No credit is allowed by section 32 in the case of a taxable year covering a period of less than 12 months. However, the rule of the preceding sentence does not apply to a taxable year closed by reason of the death of the eligible individual.
( c ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) *Earned income.* For purposes of this section, earned income is computed without regard to any community property laws which may otherwise be applicable. Earned income is reduced by any net loss in earnings from self-employment. Earned income does not include amounts received as a pension, an annuity, unemployment compensation, or workmen's compensation, or an amount to which section 871(a) and the regulations thereunder apply (relating to income of nonresident alien individuals not connected with United States business).
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) *Coordination of credit with advance payments* — ( 1 ) *Recapture of excess advance payments.* If any advance payment of earned income credit under section 3507 is made to an individual by an employer during any calendar year, then the total amount of these advance payments to the individual in that calendar year is treated as an additional amount of tax imposed (by chapter 1 of the Code) upon the individual on the tax return for the individual's last taxable year beginning in that calendar year.
( 2 ) *Reconciliation of payments advanced and credit allowed.* Any additional amount of tax under paragraph (e)(1) of this section is not treated as a tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code for purposes of determining the amount of any credit (other than the earned income credit) allowable under part IV, subchapter A, chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
[T.D. 7683, 45 FR 16175, Mar. 13, 1980. Redesignated by T.D. 8448, 57 FR 54923, Nov. 23, 1992; T.D. 9045, 68 FR 10656, Mar. 6, 2003]
#### § 1.367(b)-8 Allocation of earnings and profits and foreign income taxes in certain foreign corporate separations. [Reserved]
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT SEPT 10, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 08- 10623 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 06 -000 10 -C R -J F N -6 U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s T O N Y S M I T H , a .k .a . R ap p W a r e , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( S e p t e m b e r 10, 2008) B efo re A N D E R S O N , B IR C H an d D U B IN A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: L auraW heat on , appo i nt ed coun se l for T on y S m i th i n thi s di re ctcr i m i nal2

appe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a t i on of the appe l l a nta nd f i l e d abr i e f

pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the ent i re re cord revea l s that co u n sel ’ s assessm en to f th e rel at i v e m eri to f th e ap p eal i s co rrect . B ecau se in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r d r e v e a ls n o a r g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and S m i th’ s c on vi ct i on and sent ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
Motion Denied; Order filed November 29, 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00205

- CR

____________ SANTHY INTHALANGSY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1471491



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Inger H. Chandler . Appellant ’ s brief was originally due July 16, 2018

. We have granted more than 90 days ’
extension to file appellant ’ s brief until November 19, 2018. When we granted the last extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed. On November 19, 2018 , counsel fileda further request for extension of time to file appellant ’ s brief. Counsel did not allege

any exceptional circumstances in the request.
We deny the request for extension and order Inger H. Chandler to file a brief
with the clerk of this c o urt on or before December 19, 2018 . If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as ordered, the c ourt may issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for
the failure to file the brief a nd the consideration of sanctions or other appropriate
relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Donovan.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2015-C31, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C31

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|