alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersignedPresident & Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certifies, that to their knowledge:

1)              the Company’s Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78*o*(d)); and

2)              theinformation contained in the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/Martin J. Reid                       |                    | /s/William J. Schmidt |   |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Martin J. Reid                          | William J. Schmidt      |
| President & Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: August 14, 2006                   | Date: August 14, 2006   |

 

----
# C_2015026EN.01003602.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/36

---

Action brought on 14 November 2014 — Ice Mountain Ibiza v OHIM — Etyam (ocean beach club ibiza)

(Case T-753/14)

(2015/C 026/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ice Mountain Ibiza, SL (San Antonio, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Gracia Albero and F. Miazzetto, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Etyam, SL (Islas Baleares, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ocean beach club ibiza’ — Application for registration No 1 0 6 10  491

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Partial opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 July 2014 in Case R 2293/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including all those resulting to date from proceedings before the Opposition Division and the First Board of Appeal of OHIM at earlier stages of the proceedings which have led to the present action. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including all those resulting to date from proceedings before the Opposition Division and the First Board of Appeal of OHIM at earlier stages of the proceedings which have led to the present action.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-1, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  con- tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,471
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  52,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53,517
<PP&E>                                         3,209,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,087,257)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,175,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,098
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,170,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,175,280
<SALES>                                        127,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,727
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  79,573<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                19,630
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            19,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   19,630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### § 1.346-3 Effect of certain sales.

The determination of whether assets sold in connection with a partial liquidation are sold by the distributing corporation or by the shareholder is a question of fact to be determined under the facts and circumstances of each case.
PUBLIC LAW 115–23—APR. 13, 2017 131 STAT. 89 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 43: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Feb. 16, considered and passed House. 

Mar. 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–23 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the final rule submitted by Secretary of Health and Human Services 

relating to compliance with title X requirements by project recipients in selecting 

subrecipients. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Secretary of Health and 

Human Services relating to compliance with title X requirements 

by project recipients in selecting subrecipients (81 Fed. Reg. 91852; 

December 19, 2016), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Approved April 13, 2017. 

Apr. 13, 2017 

[H.J. Res. 43] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON TROY BINGAMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 290 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of March, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
39180.

#### SMITH v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT.

Decided January 29, 1962.

*Merritt ■& Pruitt, Glyndon C. Prxdtt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Carter Goode, Paul Miller, Assistant Attorneys-General, Dudley Hancock,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

' 1. In an appeal to the superior court from the award of the assessors in a condemnation proceeding, it is error for the court to charge the jury on the question of conse*246quential benefits where there is no evidence that there will be any consequential benefits to that portion of the land not taken. *Garden Parks, Inc. v. Fulton County,*88 Ga. App. 97 (3) (76 SE2d 31); *Stanfield v. State Highway Dept.,*95 Ga. App. 452 (1) (98 SE2d 40). While two witnesses for the condemnor testified in the instant case that the condemnee’s remaining property would be benefited by the construction of the expressway on that portion of the condemnee’s property taken, neither of these witnesses testified specifically as to the amount of enhancement in value or even the percentage of increase in the value of the property. Under the decision of this court in *Andrus v. State Highway Dept.,*93 Ga. App. 827, 829 (93 SE2d 174), affirmed, 212 Ga. 737 (95 SE2d 781), the testimony in this case was insufficient to authorize a charge on consequential benefits, since there must be specific evidence as to the consequential benefits from which the jury could reasonably estimate the amount of improvement before they could deduct it from the consequential damages.

While this court is bound by the decision of the Supreme Court in the *Andrus*case, the writer of this opinion is inclined to agree with the views of Justice Hawkins as set forth in the dissenting opinion, concurred in by Chief Justice Duckworth. We are having to reverse this case for the reason that the condemnor failed to present opinion evidence as to the specific value of consequential benefits which would have supported the charge of the court thereon. As pointed out in the dissenting opinion in the *Andrus*case, supra, the jury is not bound by such opinion evidence, but may fix value from other evidence before them tending to illustrate the question. However, following the ruling in the *Andrus*case, supra, we must conclude that the trial judge erred in giving the instructions objected to> in special grounds 4, 5 and 8 for the reasons assigned in those grounds.

2. The trial judge’s instruction in this case as to the method of arriving at the consequential damages (excluding those portions of the charge which related to the question of consequential benefits) in the absence of a request to charge was not reversible error. *State Highway Board v. Bridges,*60 Ga. App. 240 (2, 3) (3 SE2d 907). The remaining special grounds are *247therefore without merit. If the condemnee desired additional instructions in the case on the measure of consequential damages, he should have submitted a timely written request to charge.

The general grounds are not ruled upon as the case is to be tried again.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Nichols, P. J., concurs. Frankum, J., concurs in the judgment only.*
Exhibit 10.22  


February 27,
2007 


To
the Board of Directors of

Taliera Corporation 


Gentlemen:



        The
undersigned previously subscribed for and agreed to purchase 1,416,667 Warrants ("Insider Warrants") at $1.20 per Insider Warrant, of Taliera Corporation (the "Corporation") for an
aggregate purchase price of $1,700,000 ("Purchase Price"), pursuant to terms set forth in Letter Agreements dated July 28, 2006, December 7, 2006 and January 10, 2007 (the "Letter
Agreement"). This agreement amends the Letter Agreement to provide for the undersigned's agreement to purchase an additional 250,000 Insider Warrants in accordance with the same terms in the Letter
Agreement. 


        The
undersigned hereby agrees to purchase an additional 250,000 Insider Warrants at $1.20 per Insider Warrant, for and aggregate purchase price of $300,000 all in accordance with the
terms of the Letter Agreement. In all other respects, the terms of the Letter Agreement remain in full force and effect. 



	

 	

 	

Very truly yours,
	

 	

 	

TALIERA HOLDINGS, LLC
	

 	

 	

By:	

/s/ J. SMOKE WALLIN
 J. Smoke Wallin, CEO
	

Agreed	

 	

 
	

TALIERA CORPORATION	

 	

 
	

By:	

/s/ J. SMOKE WALLIN
 J. Smoke Wallin, CEO	

 	

 
	

MORGAN JOSEPH & CO. INC.	

 	

 
	

By:	

/s/ JEFFREY SIEGLEN
 Name: Jeffrey Sieglen

Title: Managing Director
PUBLIC LAW 115–17—MAR. 31, 2017 131 STAT. 81 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 42: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Feb. 15, considered and passed House. 

Mar. 13, 14, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–17 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to drug 

testing of unemployment compensation applicants. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Federal-State Unemployment Compensation Program; Middle 

Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 Provision on Establishing Appropriate Occupations for Drug Testing of Unemployment 

Compensation Applicants’’ (published at 81 Fed. Reg. 50298 (August 

1, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Approved March 31, 2017. 

Mar. 31, 2017 

[H.J. Res. 42] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

IRS redesignated the following sections to appear below the undesignated center heading “Regulations Applicable to Certain Bonds Sold Prior to July 8, 1997” and preceding the undesignated center heading “Deductions for Personal Exemptions.” See 62 FR 25507 and 25513, May 9, 1997 for the specific sections involved in the redesignation.

#### § 1.404(e)-1 [Reserved]
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 22

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain committees for

the One Hundred Third Congress, or until their successors are chosen.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To constitute the minority party’s membership on certain

committees for the One Hundred Third Congress, or

until their successors are chosen.

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the mi2 nority party’s membership on the following committees for

3 the One Hundred Third Congress, or until their successors

4 are chosen:

5 COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Domenici, Mr.

6 Grassley, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Bond, Mr. Lott,

7 Mr. Brown, Mr. Gorton, and Mr. Gregg.

8 COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION: Mr.

9 Stevens, Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Helms, Mr. Warner, Mr. Dole,

10 Mr. McConnell, and Mr. Cochran.
2

SRES 22 ATS

1 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Pressler, Mr.

2 Wallop, Mr. Bond, Mr. Burns, Mr. Mack, Mr. Coverdell,

3 Mr. Kempthorne, Mr. Bennett and Mr. Chafee.

4 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Murkow5 ski, Mr. Specter, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Thurmond, and Mr.

6 Jeffords.

7 SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING: Mr. Cohen, Mr.

8 Pressler, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Jeffords, Mr.

9 McCain, Mr. Durenberger, Mr. Craig, Mr. Burns, and Mr.

10 Specter.

Æ
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8144 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to include rural emergency 

hospitals in the definition of a covered entity for purposes of the 340B 

drug discount program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2024 

Mr. BERGMAN (for himself and Mrs. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to 

include rural emergency hospitals in the definition of 

a covered entity for purposes of the 340B drug discount 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural 340B Access 

5 Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8144 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUDING RURAL EMERGENCY HOSPITALS AS 

2 COVERED ENTITIES FOR PURPOSES OF THE 

3 340B DRUG DISCOUNT PROGRAM. 

4 Section 340B(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 256b(a)(4)) is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(P) An entity that is a rural emergency 

8 hospital (as defined in section 1861(kkk)(2) of 

9 the Social Security Act) that is owned or oper10 ated by a unit of State or local government, is 

11 a public or private non-profit corporation which 

12 is formally granted governmental powers by a 

13 unit of State or local government, or is a pri14 vate non-profit rural emergency hospital which 

15 has a contract with a State or local government 

16 to provide health care services to low income in17 dividuals who are not entitled to benefits under 

18 title XVIII of the Social Security Act or eligible 

19 for assistance under the State plan under this 

20 title.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 146 (Friday, July 31, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18282]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11822 and <greek-i>11823]


Wyoming Disaster <greek-i>WY-00009

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Wyoming dated 07/24/2009.
    Incident: Flash Flooding.
    Incident Period: 07/03/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 07/24/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/22/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/26/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Natrona.
Contiguous Counties:
    Wyoming: Albany, Carbon, Converse, Fremont, Johnson, Washakie.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere...................      4.875
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.437
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11822 6 
and for economic injury is 11823 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> is Wyoming.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: July 24, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-18282 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,557,518
<SECURITIES>                                   384,193
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,227,062
<PP&E>                                         270,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,645,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          471,772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        10,608
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,133,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,645,503
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               313,174
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,250
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             41,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>