alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 71308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29697]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Colorado Serum Company of Denver, Colorado, an exclusive license to 
U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/487,179, ``THE USE OF GNRH AND 
ANALOGS THEREOF FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF PET FERRET 
ADRENOCORTICAL HYPERPLASIA'', filed on June 18, 2009.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 19, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
(301) 504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Colorado Serum Company of 
Denver, Colorado has submitted a complete and sufficient application 
for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-
bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted 
unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, 
the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-29697 Filed 11-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
### NUMBER 13

- 12

- 00 739

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E LEGACY HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relator , Legacy Home Health Agency Inc.

, fi led a petition for writ of mandamus

in th e above cause on December 6 , 2012. Th e Court requested and received a

response to the petition for writ of mandamus fr om the real party in interest, Apex

Primary Care Inc.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of

mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself2

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.4, 52.8(a),(d)

.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

4 th day of January, 2013

.
SNCR Page 1 of3 

PIPELINE 

California Portland Installation 

NOW, YOUR LONG CEMENT KILN
 

CAN TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE OF
 

SNCR'S NOX REDUCING POWER.
 

http://www.cadencerecycling.comfsncr.html 3/6/2012 
SNCR Page 2 of3 

t ... 

http://www.cadencerecycling.com/sncr.html 3/6/2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         117,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,772,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   282,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,725,000
<PP&E>                                       2,284,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,995,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,590,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,187,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        29,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,417,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,590,000
<SALES>                                     22,779,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,779,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,868,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,184,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                574,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   185,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            389,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   389,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
09-1415-cr

United States v. Lee Cho

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY

ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY

FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1.

WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST

CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION

“SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY

PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for

the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United

States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on

the 5 day of February, two thousand ten. th

PRESENT:

RALPH K. WINTER, 

JOHN M. WALKER, JR.,

ROSEMARY S. POOLER, 

Circuit Judges.

-------------------------------------------X

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

- v. - No. 09-1415-cr

SUN LEE CHO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------------------------------X
APPEARING FOR LABE M. RICHMAN, New York, NY. 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT:

APPEARING FOR

APPELLEE: JUSTIN ANDERSON, Assistant United

States Attorney, Of Counsel (Preet

Bharara, United States Attorney,

Katherine Polk Failla, Assistant

United States Attorney, Of Counsel,

on the brief), Southern District of

New York, New York, NY. 

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court

for the Southern District of New York (Sullivan, J.). 

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED,

AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby

is AFFIRMED. 

Appellant Cho appeals from a judgment of conviction

following her plea of guilty to one count of bank fraud, in

violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344. Her

sole challenge is to the district court’s order of restitution in

the amount of $49,600. Cho attempted to make restitution in full

prior to the entry of the district court’s judgment and, based on

her belief that she was successful, sought for the judgment to be

entered without an order of restitution. The district court

found that restitution was not completed prior to entry of the

judgment and denied Cho’s request. The district court also

denied a subsequent request by Cho that “a new judgment be issued

without the restitution order.” For substantially the reasons
relied upon by the district court, the district court’s judgment

of conviction and subsequent order are AFFIRMED. 

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11196-11197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5029]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 16, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of 
current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between May, 
2009, and September, 2009, designated as Work Items. A complete listing 
of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is 
available at http://www.astm.org.

[[Page 11197]]

    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 3, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on December 22, 2009 (74 FR 68078)

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-5029 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

FORM 10Q PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,091
<INVENTORY>                                      1,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,230
<PP&E>                                          68,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,698
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,210
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (51,457)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,644
<SALES>                                          8,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,945
<CGS>                                            7,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   833
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,467)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,467)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (287)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,754)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($2.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($2.68)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") of Community National Bancorporation
(the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, each of the undersigned officers of the of the Registrant hereby
certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.

Date:  August 16, 2004                By:  /s/Theron G. Reed
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Theron G. Reed
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                      By:  /s/W. Paul Gephart
                                           -------------------------------
                                           W. Paul Gephart
                                           Chief Financial Officer
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 

MDE 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101. www.mde.state.md.us 

Mart:.in O'Malley 

Governor 

Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. 

Secretary 

Ant:.hony G. Brmvn 

Lieutenant Governor 

D 2 ;ofl 

Linda C. Janey, J.D., Assistant Secretary 

Clearinghouse and Communications 

Maryland State Clearinghouse for 

Intergovenunental Assistance 

Maryland Office of Planning 

301 West Preston Street 

Baltimore MD 21201 

Dear Ms. Janey: 

I am enclosing a copy of the introductory sections of the State of Maryland Lead (Pb) 

Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP). Section 11 O(a) of the federal Clean Air Act requires 

that each SIP provide for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS. This 

section also requires that within three years of the promulgation of a NAAQS, a state must adopt and 

submit such a plan to EPA. 

These "infrastructure SIPs" provide assurances of state resources and authorities, and where 

necessary establish the basic state programs, to implement, maintain, and enforce new or revised 

standards. This document summarizes where the § 11 O(a) (2) requirements for the 2008 revised lead 

NAAQS are addressed in Maryland's current SIP or pending SIP revisions. This document may also be 

viewed at the website link below: 

http://www.mde.state.!TId.us/ProlZrams/AirPrograms/air planning/index.asp 

A public hearing on the redesignation request will be held on December 5, 2012. The official 

close of the comment period occurs at the end of business hours on December 5, 2012. 

The hearing will be held as required by federal law (Clean Air Act at 42 U.S.c.. 7410 (a) and 

40 CFR 51.102). If you have any comments on this redesignation request, please call me at 

(410) 537-3240. 

Sjn~h:Jlll/li<---- (; 

Jim Wilkinson ' 

Natural Resources Planner 

Air and Radiation Management Administration 

www. mde.state.md.us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Trust 2015-LC22 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included inthe Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

National CooperativeBank, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer,National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust,National Association, as Trustee, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as TrustAdvisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the Somerset ParkApartments Mortgage Loan, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trusteefor the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, asTrust Advisor for the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, CoreLogicCommercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant forthe Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, and National Tax Search, LLC, asServicing Function Participant for the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 19, 2020

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### § 1.332-7 Indebtedness of subsidiary to parent.

If section 332(a) is applicable to the receipt of the subsidiary's property in complete liquidation, then no gain or loss shall be recognized to the subsidiary upon the transfer of such properties even though some of the properties are transferred in satisfaction of the subsidiary's indebtedness to its parent. See section 337(b)(1). However, any gain or loss realized by the parent corporation on such satisfaction of indebtedness, shall be recognized to the parent corporation at the time of the liquidation. For example, if the parent corporation purchased its subsidiary's bonds at a discount and upon liquidation of the subsidiary the parent corporation receives payment for the face amount of such bonds, gain shall be recognized to the parent corporation. Such gain shall be measured by the difference between the cost or other basis of the bonds to the parent and the amount received in payment of the bonds.

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11607, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960, as amended by T.D. 9759, 81 FR 17071, Mar. 28, 2016]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof EMRISE Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as ChiefExecutive Officer and Vice President Finance and Administration of the Company,respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA                                                     |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Carmine T. Oliva                                                         |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)                    |
|                     |   |                                                                     |
|                     |   |                                                                     |
| Dated: May 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ D. JOHN DONOVAN                                                      |
|                     |   | D. John Donovan                                                          |
|                     |   | Vice President Finance and Administration (principal  financial officer) |

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----