alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE** Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-LC22 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from September 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) , and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice President Wells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
§ 1.109-1 Exclusion from gross income of lessor of real property of value of improvements erected by lessee. ( a ) Income derived by a lessor of real property upon the termination, through forfeiture or otherwise, of the lease of such property and attributable to buildings erected or other improvements made by the lessee upon the leased property is excluded from gross income. However, where the facts disclose that such buildings or improvements represent in whole or in part a liquidation in kind of lease rentals, the exclusion from gross income shall not apply to the extent that such buildings or improvements represent such liquidation. The exclusion applies only with respect to the income realized by the lessor upon the termination of the lease and has no application to income, if any, in the form of rent, which may be derived by a lessor during the period of the lease and attributable to buildings erected or other improvements made by the lessee. It has no application to income which may be realized by the lessor upon the termination of the lease but not attributable to the value of such buildings or improvements. Neither does it apply to income derived by the lessor subsequent to the termination of the lease incident to the ownership of such buildings or improvements.
( b ) The provisions of this section may be illustrated by the following example:
Example. The A Corporation leased in 1945 for a period of 50 years unimproved real property to the B Corporation under a lease providing that the B Corporation erect on the leased premises an office building costing $500,000, in addition to paying the A Corporation a lease rental of $10,000 per annum beginning on the date of completion of the improvements, the sum of $100,000 being placed in escrow for the payment of the rental. The building was completed on January 1, 1950. The lease provided that all improvements made by the lessee on the leased property would become the absolute property of the A Corporation on the termination of the lease by forfeiture or otherwise and that the lessor would become entitled on such termination to the remainder of the sum, if any, remaining in the escrow fund. The B Corporation forfeited its lease on January 1, 1955, when the improvements had a value of $100,000. Under the provisions of section 109, the $100,000 is excluded from gross income. The amount of $50,000 representing the remainder in the escrow fund is forfeited to the A Corporation and is included in the gross income of that taxpayer. As to the basis of the property in the hands of the A Corporation, see § 1.1019-1.
**DEPA RTMENT OF THE A**  **I R FORCE**  HEADQUARTERS AIR FOR CE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY

4 Nov 1 5 MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/A RM - 1 0 0 FROM: HQ AFFSA/X O F 6500 South MacArthur Blvd Bldg 4 Oklahoma City , OK 73 169 - 6918 SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 5305J (Docket No. FAA - 2000 - 8419 ) 14 CFR Exemption 5305 was granted to the United States Air F orce on 26 April 1991. As amended to 5305J, it exempts the USAF from the provisions of 14 CFR Section 91.209 (a) (1) and (b) through 30 April 2016. The requirement for USAF aircraft to conduct airborne counternarcotics training operations in support of dru g law enforcement and drug traffic interdiction without lighted aircraft position or anticollision lights remains unchanged. On behalf of the USAF, Irequest an extension in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 11. Inorder to simplify

USAF and FAA documentation/renewal procedures, the Air Force requests the expiration of 5305 to be September 30, 2018 in order to be simultaneous with the expiration of exemption 5100 of a similar subject. Please contact me with any questions at e - mail: hqaffsa.xof@us.af.mil or ( 405 ) 582 - 6087 . Thank y ou for yo ur assistance. 11/4/2015 

# X AN DR EW B . KREB S, Maj, U SA F Ch ief of Flight D irect iv

es Si gned by: KREB S. AN DR EW .B .1232714219
#### § 1.167(b)-4 Other methods.

(a) Under section 167(b)(4) a taxpayer may use any consistent method of computing depreciation, such as the sinking fund method, provided depreciation allowances computed in accordance with such method do not result in accumulated allowances at the end of any taxable year greater than the total of the accumulated allowances which could have resulted from the use of the declining balance method described in section 167(b)(2). This limitation applies only during the first two-thirds of the useful life of the property. For example, an asset costing $1,000 having a useful life of six years may be depreciated under the declining balance method in accordance with § 1.167(b)-2, at a rate of 331⁄3 percent. During the first four years or 2⁄3 of its useful life, maximum depreciation allowances under the declining balance method would be as follows:

| | Current depreciation | Accumulated depreciation | Balance |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cost of asset | | | $1,000 |
| First year | $333 | $333 | 667 |
| Second year | 222 | 555 | 445 |
| Third year | 148 | 703 | 297 |
| Fourth year | 99 | 802 | 198 |

An annual allowance computed by any other method under section 167(b)(4) could not exceed $333 for the first year, and at the end of the second year the total allowances for the two years could not exceed $555. Likewise, the total allowances for the three years could not exceed $703 and for the four years could not exceed $802. This limitation would not apply in the fifth and sixth years. See section 167(c) and § 1.167(c)-1 for restriction on the use of certain methods.

(b) It shall be the responsibility of the taxpayer to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that a method of depreciation under section 167(b)(4) is both a reasonable and consistent method and that it does not produce depreciation allowances in excess of the amount permitted under the limitations provided in such section.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Pricing for 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful 
Quarters\TM\ Two-Roll Set, etc.

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing the price of the 2010 
United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Two-Roll Set and the 
2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters 100-Coin Bags.
    The 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Two-Roll 
Sets, featuring Hot Springs National Park, Yellowstone National Park, 
Yosemite National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, and Mount Hood 
National Forest, will be priced at $32.95 each. These sets will contain 
rolls of coins struck at both the United States Mint facilities at 
Philadelphia and Denver. The first set, featuring Hot Springs National 
Park, will be released on April 19, 2010.
    The 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters 100-Coin 
Bags, also featuring Hot Springs National Park, Yellowstone National 
Park, Yosemite National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, and Mount 
Hood National Forest, will be priced at $35.95 each. Bags of coins from 
both the United States Mint facilities at Philadelphia and Denver will 
be available. The first bags, featuring Hot Springs National Park, will 
be released on April 19, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: B.B. Craig, Associate Director for 
Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street, NW.; 
Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701.

    Dated: March 3, 2010.
Edmund C. Moy,
Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2010-4866 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-1087

Docket Number

2009-SW-32-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.00.76, Revision 0, dated February 20, 2008.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 175 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 175

To authorize the termination of the 1903 lease on Guantanamo Bay, as a 
  gesture of good will, at such time as democracy is achieved in Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 22, 1993

Mr. Moynihan submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the termination of the 1903 lease on Guantanamo Bay, as a 
  gesture of good will, at such time as democracy is achieved in Cuba.

Whereas the Cuban people have suffered more than three decades of dictatorial 
        government under Fidel Castro;
Whereas the end of the cold war has brought freedom and democracy to many 
        formerly totalitarian states around the world; and
Whereas the United States has had a long and close association and friendship 
        with the people of Cuba: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that when freedom and 
democracy are achieved in Cuba, the United States of America should 
unilaterally terminate the 1903 lease on its facilities at Guantanamo 
Bay, Cuba as a gesture of good will toward the people of Cuba.

                                 <all>
```
#### § 1.1033(h)-1 Effective date.

Except as provided otherwise in § 1.1033(e)-1 and § 1.1033(g)-1, the provisions of section 1033 and the regulations thereunder are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending after August 16, 1954.

(Secs. 1033 (90 Stat. 1920, 26 U.S.C. 1033), and 7805 (68A Stat. 917, 26 U.S.C. 7805))

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11910, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960. Redesignated and amended by T.D. 7625, 44 FR 31013, May 30, 1979. Further redesignated and amended by T.D. 7758, 46 FR 6925, Jan. 22, 1981]
'OERARTMEWTDF 

TRANSPORWION 

^•OCKEI OPER/^IONS 

2010 OCT - U A q:.2.5 

801 South Victoria Avcnun.Siiilo 200 Vfinliira. California 93003 

VAW/.vcnliiracliainbBr.coni » 805.676.7500 » ra,x: 805.650.1111 

August 24. 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Depailmenl of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington D.C. 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is sent to you to indicate the Ventura Chamber of Commerce's support of the 

application of Ventura County/Oxnard Airport for a grant in the 2010 Small Community 

Air Service Development Program. The grant requested is $520,000 with a local 

contribution and ticket purchase program of $480,000 as an incentive for new air service 

at Oxnard Airport. 

The Oxnard Airport has had continuous passenger air service since 1946 and. 

unfortunately, United Express terminated its scheduled air service on June 8"^ of this 

year leaving Oxnard Airport with no air service. The loss of air service has a significant 

impact on our business. Our only option is to now drive to either Burbank Airport or Los 

Angeles International Airport. The drive on the freeways from Ventura County is long 

and very congested. It can easily take over two hours to get to either airport. 

I understand that Ventura County Department of Airports management has had meeting 

with Horizon Air about providing nonstop service to San Jose with flights continuing on to 

its markets in the Pacific Northwest. We are in support of this type of air service and will 

be an important link to markets in the north and connections to other areas. We believe 

that if Horizon Air is successful at Oxnard Airport. Horizon will add more flights to other 

markets or other airlines will come to our airport with nonstop service to other regional 

hub airports. 

Our community needs air service at Oxnard Airport and this will be a good start. I 

strongly support the application of Ventura County/Oxnard Airport for a grant under this 

program and will support the new air service. 

Sincerely, 

Sandra M, Walker 

President and CEO 

Ventura Chamber of Commerce 

l\ilission Statement To promote quality ot life through economic vitality"
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUE OF ESTATE.

Court of Appeals for Wood County.

#### Joseph A. Holmes as Executor of the Will of Peter Fackleman, Deceased, v. Heinrich Fackleman.

Decided, May 8, 1913.

*Wills*— Construction *of Devise of Residue Bequeathed to Nephews and Nieces.*

The testator bequeathed the residue of his estate to the children of his two sisters, share and share alike. *Held:*That the division should be made among said children *per capita*and not *per stirpes.*

*Fries, Powel Smiley,*for plaintiff.

*Benj. F. James,*contra.

Kinkade, P. J.; Richards, J., and Chittenden, J., concur.

Appeal from Court of Common Pleas of Wood County, Ohio.

This was an action in the court of common pleas to secure the construction of the will of Peter Fackleman, deceased. The clause in dispute was paragraph number three of the will which reads as follows:

> “Third: I give, devise and bequeath all the residue of my estate after paying my just debts, funeral expenses, and erecting the monument heretofore mentioned to the children of my sisters, Margaret Fackleman and Marion Fackleman, to be equally divided between them share and share alike. If any of the children of my said sisters shall have died leaving children, then *110it is my will that the share of the said child or children of my said sisters, Margaret Fackleman and Marion Fackleman, shall be equally divided among the children of such deceased child or children.”

The only portion of this paragraph to which we need give any attention is the first clause. The two sisters mentioned, Margaret and Marion Fackleman, were dead at the time of the execution of the will. One of them had nine children living, and the other four. The sole question is should the estate of the testator be divided into two parts, one half going to the nine children of one sister and the other half to the four children of the other sister, or should the estate be divided into thirteen parts, one thirteenth going to each child.

We are very clearly of the opinion that the latter method of division is the proper one under the clause of the will quoted, and we think this conclusion is fully sustained by the following cases: *Huston*v. *Crook,*38 O. S., 328; *Mooney, Guardian,*v. *Purpus, Executor, et al,*70 O. S., 57; *Hughes et al*v. *Hughes et al,*82 U. S., 408 (same case in 118 Ky., 751); *McIntyre*v. *McIntyre,*192 U. S., 116.

We think the authorities cited, to sustain the contention that the estate should be divided into two parts, one of each to go to the children of each sister, are not in accord with the holdings of our own Supreme Court, nor in accord with the language of the United States Supreme Court in the ease cited above.

We hold that the estate should be divided into thirteen parts, and passed to the children of Margaret and Marion Fackleman as an entire class, share and share alike as-stated in the will, each taking a thirteenth part.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS
AUSTIN

oIut.0 c. MIWW A-.-i Fpn.Xlter C. ?~:oodwnrd,

Article 7064a, lature reads 8s follows: T'ase2

as amnded by the 46th&egti-

*Every group of individuals, society, association or oorporation dcmici&ed in the State of Texas twnsaatlng the busiress of life, aooldent, or lire and accident, health . and eccident insurance for profit, or for mutual bene 'Itor protoatlon, shall at the 

# time of filing its annulila&at6Dlbntmbport to 

### th6 Bard at fne\raanoo oOnieSion6ra th6 gro66 -tufQremlum5rrael~rrc8Iarppoothe llY66ofmmull5r48illingardumlull64Lnthle .. stat6aiulrIgth8plw6dlngy6arandwah~~m&

it*lumpayth6faxll6r6ial6Yiel¶upon~ glvss pramon for 6wh klD& ef s.wurenu6 

## rriftsn; the proYlsicm6 of thla Aut alall not ,appl.y to 

# fdmwnal

- 

# ol=ganlzations UT ,~uul6tlea 

# wn¶t uaitth4ss.rlEaprbasship 

# toon6 06ullpat~all. The report ot the -8s pramiun

# raedpts al&l bemadeupontheawurndMmentattnu(8~ plalulpal offia6re, Dsduutiontlfxwi the gnwp p&lm lwrblpt5aha3lbeallolda~uy~Qt hillvldual6, eooi6ty, aa8ouiatioxt. er 

### uorporatlon of an aagul.e~tXon ooet uf all oi the f-t year*8 praxiium~,axa~tthatan induatrialbus%noWsui?h aompanlss shall be penaltted to deduat one anil one-half (141 times the agpunt or the tinat year*6prealums as acquisition costs. Upon receipt by it,of the sworn statements above provided for, the Board of Insurance Cotissioners shall certify to the State Treasurer the m:ountoof taxes due by each of such group of Individuals. society, assoolatlon, or coporation, which tax shall be pald to the Sate .reasurer on or before the 1st of Karch following and the Treasurer shall Issue his recei'pttherefor as evidence of the payment of such taxes. 170such group of lndlvtiuals, society, association, or COrpOI=tiOn 

### shallreaelvea permitto do businessuntilall suahtaxes~epa~d. l&4 tax48 4.foreeaid tatall 4ontttitttt6

all tax68 atuiliOette6 f64e uoll60tl~l6 'uttaert3t4lrnaorthitt~tuegaitt6tadJnwh ittmtr6aee

er@ttmat1utts,uxwpt the *44s)?rwia6d

wet quota tzrn wordS*& l4!@+ea, Vol. 6. page 8514 as folltmtt 

### Tl9nb

6onalderrtlon'paldfor a poliayaf lnsunnee 1s aallsd th4 lLmnllim*

aTheflrstpre&ummmns 

### thsffratpqmant 

## or pmamlum

as dlstingni&@ fnrmtha first annual prdllDI." 

### First p&lay m mana yearfor wbS.oh pOl.lOy w&s fhtt lastted,.Words B Phnrsss, 

### VQ& 3, page 685..dlrpo800Hon. Wdter C. Woohard, pat344

fnmranoe ~oqm.nyLZ38 ' the oases of Carter vs. Standard Paa. 259; American National Insuranoe Qnqx3ny vs. Thcnnpson, 186 SW 254.

Artlale 7064a, sup?& spaoliloally provides that the deductions iram,the gross p&urn receipts shall be allowed any gmup or +llviduals, saalety, assoolatlon, or oorporatlon of an aoqulaitlon sot& of all th4

# rirst par%4 pretdtmleuxaept,

## that on lnatlstrpklbtlel4ee "uf4o~
| (logo) ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February 6, 2017

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE:         Annual Statement as to Compliance 

WFCM 2015 LC22

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Poolingand Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of theCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-LC22, as an authorizedofficer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCBSpecial Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereofthat:

 

a.            A review of the activities of the NCB Special Servicer during the preceding calendaryear (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.            To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Special Servicerhas fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2017.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President,Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8061 

To temporarily provide additional deposits into the Crime Victims Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2024 

Mrs. WAGNER (for herself, Mr. MORAN, Mrs. DINGELL, Mrs. BICE, and Mr. 

COSTA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To temporarily provide additional deposits into the Crime 

Victims Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crime Victims Fund 

5 Stabilization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPOSITS IN CRIME VICTIMS FUND. 

7 Section 1402(b)(6) of the Victims of Crime Act of 

8 1984 (34 U.S.C. 20101) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

10 the end; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8061 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

2 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(C) from the date of enactment through 

5 fiscal year 2029, sections 3729 through 3731 of 

6 title 31, United States Code (commonly known 

7 as the ‘False Claims Act’), provided that— 

8 ‘‘(i) amounts necessary to remunerate 

9 qui tam plaintiffs as described in sub10 section (d) of section 3730 of title 31, 

11 United States Code, are not available for 

12 deposit to the Fund; and 

13 ‘‘(ii) amounts necessary to reimburse 

14 the United States Government for the 

15 damages which the Government sustains 

16 from acts described in subsection (a) of 

17 section 3729 of title 31, United States 

18 Code, are not available for deposit to the 

19 Fund.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS