alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 5/27/15 P. v. Williams CA2/6 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION SIX 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

v. 

REGINALD WILLIAMS, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

2d Crim. No. B259397 

(Super. Ct. No. TA128215) 

(Los Angeles County) 

Reginald Williams appeals from an August 21, 2014 order revoking 

probation and sentencing him to four years state prison. On May 29, 2013, appellant pled 

no contest to one count of vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (a))1 and admitted a prior 

strike conviction (§§ 667, subd. (d); 1170.12.) The trial court sentenced appellant to four 

years state prison, suspended execution of sentence, and granted probation subject to the 

condition that appellant serve one year in a residential treatment program. (§ 1203.1, 

subd. (a).) 

 Appellant was non-compliant and failed to complete the residential 

treatment program. On August 21, 2014, the trial court revoked probation, ordered 

appellant to serve the four year sentence previously imposed, and denied appellant's 

subsequent request for a formal probation violation hearing. Appellant was ordered to 

pay a $300 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)) and a $300 parole restitution fine (§ 

1202.45). 

 

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code. 
2

 We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel’s 

examination of the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. 

 On April 2, 2015, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to 

personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. No response has 

been received from appellant. 

 We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's 

attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. 

(People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 

126.) 

 The judgment is affirmed. 

 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED. 

 YEGAN, J. 

We concur: 

 GILBERT, P.J. 

 PERREN, J. 
3

John J. Lonergan, Jr., Judge 

Superior Court County of Los Angeles 

______________________________ 

 Joseph R. Escobosa, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for 

Defendant and Appellant. 

 No appearance for Respondent.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q 

(Mark One)

(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

or

( )   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number        033-14852-01
AMERICAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50723 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE SANCHEZ-CALDERON, also known as Jorge Sanchez-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-732-ALL-DB

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge Sanchez-Calderon appeals the 46-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of attempting to illegally reenter the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Sanchez-Calderon complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his priorNo. 01-50723 -2- removal following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due Process Clause. Alternatively, Sanchez-Calderon contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Sanchez-Calderon acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issues for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). SanchezCalderon’s arguments are foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Appendix A

EPA AQS Preliminary Design Value Report (AMP480) dated March 23, 2012
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50556 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SALVADOR AGUILAR-MUNIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-96-CR-341

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1997 Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Salvador Aguilar-Muniz appeals from his sentence for illegal reentry into the United States after his deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. His motion for a stay of his appeal pending the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. AlmendarezTorres , 113 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. granted , 117 S. Ct. 1333 (1997), is DENIED. Aguilar-Muniz argues that he was charged with and pleaded guilty to illegal reentry under § 1326(a) and that he could notNo. 97-50556 -2- be sentenced under § 1326(b)(2) because the indictment failed to allege that he had a prior aggravated felony conviction. His argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera , 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor401 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE





Reference is hereby
made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as General Special Servicer, Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington
Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Certificate
Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C23 (the
“Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



|1. |  | A review of the activities
of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),
and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
the Reporting Period.                                                      



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
the 28th day of February 2017.



|/s/ Daniel Bober         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober             | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
H. R. 8012 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To establish the Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site in the 

State of Florida, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jackie Robinson Ballpark 

National Commemorative Site Act’’. 

SEC. 2. JACKIE ROBINSON BALLPARK NATIONAL COMMEMORATIVE 

SITE. 

(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

(1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of the Interior. 

(2) SITE.—The term ‘‘Site’’ means the Jackie Robinson Ballpark National Commemorative Site designated by subsection 

(b). 

(3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State of Florida. 

(b) DESIGNATION.—Jackie Robinson Ballpark in Daytona Beach, 

Florida, is hereby designated as the Jackie Robinson Ballpark 

National Commemorative Site. 

(c) AFRICAN AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS NETWORK.—The Site shall 

be part of the African American Civil Rights Network established 

under the African American Civil Rights Network Act of 2017 

(Public Law 115–104). 

(d) ADMINISTRATION.— 

(1) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary may enter 

into cooperative agreements with appropriate public or private 

entities for interpretative and educational purposes related to 

the Site. 

(2) EFFECT OF DESIGNATION.—The Site shall not be a unit 

of the National Park System. 

(3) LIMITATIONS.—Nothing in this Act— 

(A) authorizes the Secretary to interfere with the rights 

of any person with respect to private property or any local 

zoning ordinance or land use plan of the State or any 

political subdivision thereof; 

(B) affects the administration of the Site by any owner 

of the Site; or 

(C) authorizes the Secretary to acquire land or interests 

in land through condemnation or otherwise. 

(e) SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a special 

resource study of the Site to evaluate the national significance 
H. R. 8012—2 

of the Site and determine the suitability and feasibility of 

designating the Site as a unit of the National Park System. 

(2) ALTERNATIVES.—The Secretary shall consider alternatives for preservation, protection, and interpretation of the 

Site by Federal, State, or local government entities, or private 

and nonprofit organizations. 

(3) CONDUCT OF STUDY.—The study shall be conducted 

in accordance with section 100507 of title 54, United States 

Code. 

(4) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date on 

which funds are made available to conduct the study, the 

Secretary shall submit a report to Congress that describes 

the results of the study and any recommendations of the Secretary with respect to the Site. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 94 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 94

 To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9, 1993, as 
                  ``National Customer Service Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 18 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

  Mr. Dole (for himself, Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Inouye, Mr. 
 Mathews, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Glenn, Mr. Nunn, Mr. Thurmond, 
 Mr. Akaka, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Burns, Mr. 
  Conrad, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Packwood, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. 
  Hatch, Mr. Hatfield, Mr. Levin, Mr. Brown, Mr. Coats, Mr. Dodd, Mr. 
 Johnston, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. Pressler, Mr. Sasser, Mr. Exon, Mr. 
Shelby, Mr. Simon, Mr. Specter, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Craig, Mr. Durenberger, 
  Mr. Gramm, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. 
  Reid, Mr. Helms, Mr. Mack, and Mr. Cohen) introduced the following 
joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

           September 10 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the week of October 3, 1993, through October 9, 1993, as 
                  ``National Customer Service Week''.

Whereas recognition of the value and importance of the customer raises the 
        quality of customer service;
Whereas the high cost of attracting new customers today heightens the need for 
        companies to keep existing customers through effective customer service;
Whereas recognition of the contributions made by customer service to the 
        profitability of a company increases the professional status of customer 
        service;
Whereas excellent customer service distinguishes successful companies that 
        understand the important influence a customer has on the success of a 
        company; and
Whereas excellent customer service can contribute to the growth and success of 
        every company: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of October 3, 
1993, through October 9, 1993, is designated as ``National Customer 
Service Week''. The President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe the 
week with the appropriate ceremonies and activities.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         167,738
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,194
<PP&E>                                       5,503,032
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,746,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,023,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,750
<COMMON>                                        21,834
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,882,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,023,817
<SALES>                                        633,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               633,136
<CGS>                                          597,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,901,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,867,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,867,786)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (8,003)
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,875,789)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
Description of Long-Term Incentive Performance Measures


    Exhibit
      10.2

    


    Description
      of Long-Term Incentive Performance Measures

    for
      the
      2007 through 2008 Performance Cycle

    


    On
      February 22, 2007, subject to meeting the requirements of Section 162(m) of
      the
      Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Compensation Committee
      established the two-year performance goals for the 2007 plan cycle. The cash
      payment for executives under this plan cycle is intended to be based on
      achievement of the following performance measure:

    


    
      	·  	
               
100%
                of the performance measure is based on achievement of RadioShack’s EBITDA
                target.

            


    

     

    Actual
      amounts
      payable, if any, can range from 50% to 150% of the target amounts, depending
      on
      the extent to which performance under the foregoing criteria meets, exceeds
      or
      is below the target. Mr. Day is not a participant in this performance
      cycle.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 06, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 06, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0179. VIRGINIA MARSHALL v. ACE HOMES LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15A10448
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549
                              --------------------

                                    FORM 10-Q/A
                                (AMENDMENT NO. 1)

[X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 
                                  Act of 1934

                  For the quarterly period ended March 22, 1998

[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                                  Act of 1934

       For the transition period from ______ to ________

                              --------------------

                         COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-17980

                              --------------------

                            RALLY'S HAMBURGERS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                 DELAWARE                                    62-1210077
      (State or other jurisdiction of                 (IRS Employer ID Number)
       incorporation or organization)

            600 Cleveland Street, Eighth Floor, Clearwater, FL 33755
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 813/441-3500

         Indicate by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                                  Yes [X]     No [ ]

         Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

                 CLASS - Common stock, Par value $.10 per share

                OUTSTANDING AT APRIL 15, 1998 - 24,871,123 shares

<PAGE>


SIGNATURE



                  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                        Rally's Hamburgers, Inc.
                                        ------------------------------------
                                              (Registrant)



Date: May 13, 1998                       By:  /s/Joseph N. Stein
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Joseph N. Stein
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principle Accounting Officer)



                                       15
#### § 1.5000C-5 Anti-abuse rule.

If a foreign person engages in a transaction (or series of transactions) with a principal purpose of avoiding the tax imposed under section 5000C, the transaction (or series of transactions) may be disregarded or the arrangement may be recharacterized (including disregarding an intermediate entity), in accordance with its substance. If this section applies, the foreign person remains liable for any tax (including any tax obligation unsatisfied as a result of underwithholding) and the Internal Revenue Service retains all other rights and remedies under any applicable law available to collect any tax imposed on the foreign contracting party by section 5000C.

[T.D. 9782, 81 FR 55138, Aug. 18, 2016]