alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.24

March 21, 2003

Mr. David L. Gussack
President
General Bearing Corp.
44 High Street
West Nyack, NY 10994

Re: Credit Agreement among General Bearing Corporation and KeyBank National
Association as Administrative Agent and The Several Lenders From Time to Time
Parties to the Credit Agreement, as Lenders, dated December 20, 1999.

Dear Dave,

This letter confirms that KeyBank, as Administrative Agent and sole Lender, has
extended the Scheduled Revolving Termination Date from April 30, 2003 to June
30, 2003.

All other terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement remain in full force and
effect.

Please call me with any questions.

Sincerely,



Joseph F. Markey
Senior Vice President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MICHAEL O. ANDREWS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 493 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of February, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
SANITIZED DNW - 5500 CAS / IES NUMBER
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to Registration
Statement No. 033-73986 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account
D of our report dated February 28, 2003, relating to the financial statements
of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, appearing in this
Statement of Additional Information which is part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public
Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Principal Plus Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       9,316,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,271,735<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,271,735<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,831,986<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,448,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,358,140<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,358,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,358,140
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $107,220 and Investment in U.S. Treasury
Securities of $43,809,765.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $2,202,970, accrued brokerage
fees of $176,884, accrued administrative expenses of $206,640 and accrued
management fees of $44,221.
<F3>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $2,829,720, net
change in unrealized of $(672,212), interest income of $1,464,046 and
change in valuation of Yield Pool of $210,432.
<F4>Income-Pretax, Income Continuing and Net Income includes minority
interest in income of $25,367.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act Of 1993--Information Card Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 29, 2010, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 (``the Act''), Information Card Foundation has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Novell, Waltham, 
MA; and Intel, Hillsboro, OR have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Information Card Foundation intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On June 2, 2008, Information Card Foundation filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on July 16, 2008 (73 FR 0883)
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
25, 2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on October 27, 2009 (74 FR 55257)

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-5036 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 10.3.2




 




Promissory Note




 




Dated:  September 1,

1999




 




Opus360

Corporation (the “Company”) has loaned to Ari Horowitz (the “Employee”) the sum

of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000). 

The Employee promises to pay to the Company the sum of Twenty Thousand

Dollars ($20,000), on demand, with interest at the rate of seven percent (7%)

per annum, compounded annually, accruing on the unpaid balance from the date

hereof to the date of payment.




 




In any action to collect any

payment due under this Promissory Note, the Company shall be entitled to

recover all of its expenses incurred in connection with such action, including,

without limitation, reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs.




 




Witness my hand and seal as of

this 1st day of September 1999.




 




 




	

  The Employee:


  	

   


  	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

  Ari Horowitz
Exhibit 10.1


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    Summary
      of Management Incentive Compensation Plan for Fiscal 2006

     

    The
      Management Incentive Compensation Plan for Fiscal 2006 for Frontier Oil
      Corporation (the “Company”) establishes each participant’s incentive target as a
      percentage of the participant’s base salary. The amount of the actual bonus
      payment could range from zero to twice the incentive target, based upon the
      extent to which the pre-established annual financial goals are met or exceeded.
      The financial goals for 2006 are based on the net income of the Company during
      fiscal 2006. 

     

    Each
      participant will receive 30%, and has the right to elect to receive up to 100%,
      of his or her bonus payment in restricted shares of the Company’s common stock
      in lieu of cash, except that the Chief Executive Officer may elect to receive
      all of his bonus payment in cash. If such an election is made to receive
      additional restricted stock, then the amount of the stock portion of the bonus
      will be grossed up by a “risk premium” of 150% with respect to that portion in
      excess of 30% thereof elected to be received in restricted stock. All shares
      of
      restricted stock will vest 25% on each of the first and second anniversaries
      of
      the grant date and 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date. The number
      of
      shares of restricted stock that a participant receives will be determined by
      the
      average closing price of the Company’s common stock during December and January
      immediately preceding the grant date.

     

    The
      Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the
      Company has the discretion to adjust the net income targets for extraordinary
      items or to pay or not pay the bonuses for 2006 for any
      reason.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40675

USDC No. C-95-CV-612

 

STEPHEN LLOYD TRAPP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; 

GARY JOHNSON, Deputy Director; 

JAMES ZELLER, Warden; 

J. GONZALES, Field Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-612

- - - - - - - - - -

March 17, 1997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stephen Lloyd Trapp, Texas inmate # 515234, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(d). The PLRA requires a prisoner appealing IFP in a civil

action to pay the full amount of the filing fee, $105. As Trapp 
No. 96-40675

- 2 -

does not have funds, he is assessed no partial filing fee, 28

U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). 

The agency having custody of Trapp’s inmate account shall

collect the remainder of the $105 filing fee and forward for

payment to the Clerk of the District Court for the Southern

District of Texas in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) each

time the amount in Trapp's account exceeds $10 until the

appellate filing fee is paid.

Trapp argues that he was denied access to the courts because

prison officials interfered with his library time and because he

was refused clerical materials to prepare legal documents. We

have reviewed Trapp’s brief and the record and perceive no abuse

of discretion by the district court.

Trapp’s appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2.

This is not the first civil rights suit filed by Trapp 

which has been dismissed as frivolous. See Trapp v. Scott, No.

96-40338 (Aug. 28, 1996). A prisoner may not

bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in

a civil action or proceeding under this

section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more

prior occasions, while incarcerated or

detained in any facility, brought an action

or appeal in a court of the United States

that was dismissed on the grounds that it is

frivolous, , malicious, or fails to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted,

unless the prisoner is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury.
No. 96-40675

- 3 -

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Including the dismissal of this appeal and

the dismissal of the complaint from which appeal was taken, Trapp 

has three "strikes." See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-

88 (5th Cir. 1996). Therefore, except for cases involving an

imminent danger of serious physical injury, § 1915(g) bars Trapp

from proceeding further under § 1915. He may proceed in

subsequent civil cases under the fee provisions of 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 1911-14 applicable to everyone else.

IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
# C_2014329EN.01002401.xml

| 22.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/24

---

Action brought on 23 July 2014 — Volkswagen v OHIM (COMPETITION)

(Case T-550/14)

2014/C 329/33

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by U. Sander, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 May 2014 in Case R 2082/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 May 2014 in Case R 2082/2013-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘COMPETITION’ for goods and services in Classes 12, 28, 35 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 7 69  171

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
OMB.1845.XXX2.v.1 Table. 05.18.09 **Respondent Ty pe**  **Requirement # of Respondents**  **# of Responses Hours/Response**  **Total Hours Section A**  **: Burden by A**  **ffected Entity Federal Government**  **Individuals or Households** Borrowers SCRA interest cap 34 CFR 685.202 2,250 2,250 0.25 563 Sub-total 2,250 2,250 563 **Private Sector** Business or other for-profits Institutions - Proprietary - SCRA interest cap 34 CFR 685.202 1,507 1,507 0.08 121 \ Sub-total 1,507 1,507 121 **Not-for profits** Institutions - Private -SCRA interest cap 34 CFR 685.202 293 293 0.08 23 Sub-total 0 0 0 **Farms State, Local, or Tribal Governments**  Institutions - Public -SCRA interest cap 34 CFR 685.202 450 450 0.08 36 Sub-total for all Institutions 2,250 2,250 180

**Total 4,500**  **4,500 743**  **Section B: Burden Impact Totals CURRENT INVENTORY**  Current # Respondents 0 Current # of Responses 0 Current Inventory of Hours 0 **REVISED TOTA L RESPONDENTS**  4,500 **REVISED TOTA L RESPONSES**  4,500 **REVISED TOTA L BURDEN HOURS**  743

Difference 743 **Section C: Burden by Issue # within the PRA**  **Section of the Regulations TEA MS I & II**  **TEA M I PRA**  1. Section 685.202 - SCRA interest cap (PRA Issue 4) 4,500 4,500 743Grand Total 4,500 4,500 743
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 7

To provide for a Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. GRAMM (for himself, Mr. LOTT, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. PACKWOOD, Mr.

MCCAIN, Mr. BOND, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRASSLEY,

Mr. DANFORTH, Mr. HELMS, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. LUGAR, and Mr.

SMITH) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide for a Balanced Budget Constitutional

Amendment.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the

4 following article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if ratified

7 by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States

8 within seven years after its submission to the States for

9 ratification:
2

•SJ 7 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three4 fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall

5 provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts

6 by a rollcall vote.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The limit on the debt of the United

8 States held by the public shall not be increased, unless

9 three-fifths of the whole number of each House shall pro10 vide by law for such an increase by a rollcall vote.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President

12 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the

13 United States Government for that fiscal year, in which

14 total outlays do not exceed total receipts.

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become

16 law unless approved by a majority of the whole number

17 of each House by a rollcall vote.

18 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions

19 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration

20 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be

21 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is

22 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and

23 serious military threat to national security and is so de24 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the

25 whole number of each House, which becomes law.
3

•SJ 7 IS

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple2 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely

3 on estimates of outlays and receipts.

4 ‘‘SECTION 7. Total receipts shall include all receipts

5 of the United States Government except those derived

6 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of

7 the United States Government except for those for repay8 ment of debt principal.

9 ‘‘SECTION 8. This article shall take effect beginning

10 with fiscal year 1999 or with the second fiscal year begin11 ning after its ratification, whichever is later.’’.

Æ
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 92 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res. 92
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                            Joint Resolution


 
   To designate the month of October 1993 as ``National Down Syndrome

                           Awareness Month''.

Whereas advancements in education, research, and public awareness are 
  continuing to improve the quality of life for people with Down 
  syndrome;
Whereas approximately 5,000 children are born with Down syndrome 
  annually in the United States;
Whereas as ignorance, prejudices, myths, and stereotypes regarding Down 
  syndrome can be overcome only through increased awareness and 
  education;
Whereas through the efforts of concerned physicians, teachers, parent 
  groups, and the National Down Syndrome Society, programs are being 
  established to educate the parents of individuals with Down syndrome, 
  to include people with Down syndrome in all school programs, to 
  provide vocational training for individuals with Down syndrome in 
  preparation for entering the work force, and to prepare young adults 
  with Down syndrome for independent living in the community;
Whereas the television medium has greatly augmented such efforts by 
  casting actors with Down syndrome and by offering programming that 
  demonstrates to hundreds of thousands of viewers in a positive and 
  educational manner the everyday, personal, and family effects of 
  living with Down syndrome;
Whereas advancements in research are improving health care and offering 
  a brighter outlook for individuals born with Down syndrome; and
Whereas the many people with Down syndrome who attend regular schools, 
  play on Little League teams, work in corporations and businesses both 
  large and small, and volunteer in the community demonstrate daily the 
  success that people with Down syndrome are able to achieve: Now, 
  therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the month
of October 1993 is designated as ``National Down Syndrome Awareness 
Month''. The President is authorized and requested to issue a 
proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe 
this month with the appropriate ceremonies and activities.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
Figure 4 - Travel Management Rule - Coconino National Forest
er) Alternative 3 - Modified Proposed Action

Miles

|

i,
i
—- ©
es
r- NO
r—- W
LB
— Ol

© Towns
Interstate highway

U.S. highway, Arizona highway

County road
Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles Only, Yearlong

=== Roads Open to Highway Legal Vehicles Only, Seasonal

Roads Open to All Vehicles, Yearlong

Roads Open to All Vehicles, Seasonal

======= Trails Open to All Vehicles, Yearlong

seeteeeees Trails Open to Motorcycles, Yearlong

PRT Trails Open to Vehicles 50" or Less in Width, Yearlong

Heese Dispersed camping

Forest boundary

Non-National Forest System lands

Wilderness

eeeaeee Areas open to cross-country travel

hy ne oo oxy
3 AST
275 o . ‘\
ez18 |
is
874
ee)
ret)
fe
Of,
i)
“ee, .
eed oo
ty
iy Y
“yy
f
Se
ff Red Rock/Secret
‘ Wwidemecs
% 4
14 s
\ gy y
ios &
5250
25 2
sug % in
- cy
a
e a a Bevo 4]
§ a . | |©, _
4 ey r ple DF
ae
5 ast Pe ost
raf oh o
S15 9513 ff ms
- —
gett ;
PAGE
SPRINGS!
.
COTTONWOOD |g9a 5
. ce {50/ Lf
9710M
al
uf aq
. 97108
o f 4 9732.
7 ee
A Alp:
7) RIM RO.
. i Os -
C McGUIREVILLE
r “A vA
| % -
Sal ” =
ie a
©
{ §
Aes 4
f
Lf oa &
STRAWBERRY E14] ; Par
.
93635 ‘3,
PINE ve O Nees
we nf v
Mazatzal
Wildernes:
vps pages s
aera ise crore tomate and ns ces seret erat

yield inacourate or misleading reeuts. Coconino National Forest reserves the
fight to correct, update, modify or replace GIS products without notification

(Cart Boyernaim - 26-June-2009 - NAD 1963 UTM Zone 12
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RODOLFO ENRIQUE JIMÉNEZ, § ASDRÚBAL CHAVEZ, IRIS § MEDINA, MARCOS ROJAS, JOSÉ § No. 399, 2019 ALEJANDRO ROJAS, and § FERNANDO DE QUINTAL, § Cour t Below – Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware Plaintiffs/Counterclaim § Defendants Below/ § Appellants, § C.A. No. 2019-0490 § v. § § LUISA PALACIOS, EDGAR § RINCÓN, FERNANDO VERA, § ELIO TORTOLERO, ANDRÉS § PADILLA, ÁNGEL OLMETA, § JAVIER TROCONIS, LUIS § URDANETA, and RICK ESSER, § § Defendants/Counterclaim § Plaintiffs Below/ § Appellees. §

Submitted: July 8, 2020 Decided: July 22, 2020

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES

, Justices.

ORDER

This 22 nd day of July 2020, after careful c onsideration of the parties’ briefs

and the record on appeal, and following oral argument, we find it evident that thefinal judgment of the Court of Chancery s hould be affirmed on the basis of and for

the reasons stated in its August 12, 2019 opinion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED th at the judgment of the Court of

Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice