alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 134

Urging the Government of Kuwait to compensate United States citizens

and their families for financial losses incurred as a result of their evacuation during the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 23 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mrs. FEINSTEIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

APRIL 19 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Urging the Government of Kuwait to compensate United

States citizens and their families for financial losses incurred as a result of their evacuation during the Iraqi

invasion of Kuwait.

Whereas during the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990,

the United States Government evacuated numerous families within a 48-hour period;

Whereas many of these families consisted of one or more

American citizens and their immediate relatives;

Whereas the urgent nature of the evacuation process forced

these families to leave personal property and assets in

Kuwait;
2

•SRES 134 ATS

Whereas since the liberation of Kuwait, the Government of

Kuwait has not permitted these families to return to Kuwait to settle their financial accounts;

Whereas many of these families have not been compensated

for contractual and business obligations that existed before the invasion of Kuwait;

Whereas the Government of Kuwait has acknowledged that it

is ‘‘well aware of the indispensable contributions made by

many of the foreign workers who resided in Kuwait before August 2, 1990’’; and

Whereas these families are at present residing in several

States throughout the United States and are being supported through public assistance programs and loans

from the United States Government: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 President should encourage the Government of Kuwait to

3 compensate the American citizens and their families which

4 were evacuated from Kuwait during the Iraqi invasion of

5 August 1990, in accordance with the applicable contrac6 tual, business, and financial obligations of the Government

7 of Kuwait or of its citizens, as the case may be.

Æ
<Page>


                                                            [LOGO]

                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to Registration
Statement No. 033-71686 of First Fortis Life Insurance Company Separate
Account A of our report dated February 28, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of First Fortis Life Insurance Company Separate Account A,
appearing in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such
Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee Horwitz,
Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Lee Horwitz

Name:	   Lee Horwitz
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
	   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   November 14, 2006
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00500-CR

GREGORY FONSECA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

2nd 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 80-12-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 13, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before August 28, 2009 to be assured of consideration.

## Community Development Financial Institutions Fund

*OMB Number:*                     1559-0014.                

*Type of Review:*                     Revision.                

*Title:*                     New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) Program—Community Development Entity (CDE) Certification Application.                

*Form:*                     CDFI-0019.                

*Description:*                     The purpose of the NMTC Program is to provide an incentive to investors in the form of a tax credit, which is expected to stimulate investment in new private capital in low income communities. Applicants must be a CDE to apply for allocation.                

*Respondents:*                     Businesses and other for-profit institutions.                

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                     1,200 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     Ashanti McCallum (202) 622-9018, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, Department of the Treasury, 601 13th Street, NW., Suite 200 South, Washington, DC 20005.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Nicolas Fraser (202) 395-5887, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                

Celina Elphage,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-18110 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-70-P
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tryon StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**** **Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C32 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice President Wells Fargo Bank   

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8121 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8121

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
 to prohibit congestion or cordon pricing in a value pricing program, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2024

 Ms. Malliotakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
 to prohibit congestion or cordon pricing in a value pricing program, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CONGESTION OR CORDON PRICING.

    Section 1012(b) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 
Act of 1991 (23 U.S.C. 149 note) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(9) Prohibition on congestion pricing.--Notwithstanding 
        any other provision of this subsection, the Secretary may not 
        establish or maintain a value pricing program under this 
        section that includes value pricing, congestion pricing, or 
        cordon pricing.''.
                                 <all>
```
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 84

Designating the week of June 1, 1993, through June 7, 1993, as a ‘‘Week

for the National Observance of the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 21 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. DOLE (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. BURNS, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DECONCINI, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. COATS, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr.

THURMOND, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. WARNER, Mr. SASSER, Mr. DANFORTH,

Mr. SPECTER, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. HELMS, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. LEVIN, Mr.

STEVENS, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. DURENBERGER, Mr. KOHL, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mr. LOTT, Mr. BROWN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. HOLLINGS,

Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. ROBB, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. HATCH, Mr. GORTON, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. PACKWOOD, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. MACK, Mr.

PRESSLER, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. ROTH, Mr. GLENN, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. PELL, Mr. HEFLIN, Mr. RIEGLE, Mr. COHEN, Mr. GRAMM,

and Mr. WALLOP) introduced the following joint resolution; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 19 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Committee discharged

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating the week of June 1, 1993, through June 7,

1993, as a ‘‘Week for the National Observance of the

Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II’’.

Whereas the brave men and women of the United States

made tremendous sacrifices during World War II to save

the world from tyranny and aggression;
2

•SJ 84 CDS

Whereas the winds of freedom and democracy sweeping the

globe today spring from the principles for which over four

hundred thousand Americans gave their lives in World

War II;

Whereas World War II and the events that led up to that war

must be understood in order that we may better understand our own times, and more fully appreciate the reasons why eternal vigilance against any form of tyranny

is so important;

Whereas the World War II era, as reflected in its family life,

industry, and entertainment, was a unique period in

American history, and epitomized our Nation’s philosophy of hard work, courage, and tenacity in the face of

adversity;

Whereas, between 1991 and 1995, over nine million United

States veterans of World War II will be holding reunions

and conferences and otherwise commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of various events relating to World War

II; and

Whereas June 4, 1993, marks the anniversary of the beginning of the Battle of Midway, and June 6, 1993, marks

the anniversary of D-Day: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the week of June 1, 1993, through June 7, 1993,

4 is designated as a ‘‘Week for the National Observance of

5 the Fiftieth Anniversary of World War II’’, and the Presi6 dent is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation
3

•SJ 84 CDS

1 calling on the people of the United States to observe the

2 week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000855112
<NAME>                        Enex Oil & Gas Income Program IV - Series 4, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         11745
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11852
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               24411
<PP&E>                                         1165475
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1055420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          59469
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     74997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134466
<SALES>                                        32170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               32170
<CGS>                                          8617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3939
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
NO. 07-08-0192-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	MAY 1, 2008

	______________________________

	BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE,

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS,

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 44,428-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Barry Dwayne Minnfee (appellant) has filed a document with this court entitled “Extra-notice requirements General Notice of Appeal Party’s Right to Own Statement.”  In this document, appellant appears to be complaining of a judgment of conviction for aggravated assault signed on January 28, 2002.  However, the document was filed on April 28, 2008.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within 90 days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).  No motion for new trial having been filed,  appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed February 27, 2002.  Because the record discloses that appellant’s notice of appeal was received on April 28, 2008, without seeking an extension of the deadline, Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, the notice of appeal was late.

	A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding.  Id. at 523.  Appellant's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal.

	Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed.1

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice 

Do not publish.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 22, 2023

NO. 03-21-00631-CR

Chase Daniel Laird, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, KELLY, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgments of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Oliver Wilson, Appellant.

Gen. No. 51,441.

First District, Second Division.

January 28, 1969.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of Cook County, of Chicago (Ronald P. Katz and James J. Doherty, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appellant; John J. Stamos, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and James Truschke, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE LYONS.

Not to be published in full.
fl^» t-.

fl fl UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y REGIO N 5 7 7 WES T JACKSO N BOULEVAR D CHICAGO , I L 60604-359 0 

# I 5 

# 20 f REPL Y T O TH E ATTENTIO N O F WN-16 J Susan Sylvester , Directo r Burea u o f

Wate r Qualit y Wisconsi n Departmen t

o f Natura l Resource s 10 1 South Webste r

Street Pos t Offic e Bo x 792 1 Madison , Wisconsi n 53707-792 1 Dear Mrs . Sylvester : Thi s lette r

provide s the U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency' s fina l determinatio n o n you r September

25 , 201 2 reques t

t o exten dth e dat

e b y whic h Wisconsi n ca n certif y EPA' s 201 3 Vesse l Genera l Permi t

(VGP ) unde r

th e Clea n Wate r

Ac t (CWA ) § 401 . Unde r

th e CW A an d § 40 1 certificatio n regulations , aperio do f up to on e yea

r may b e grante dfo r

aState t o respon dto areques t fo r certificatio n i f

unusua l circumstance s exist . EP A believe s tha

t requirement s under

Stat e la w do represent

unusua l circumstance s whe n the y mandate specifi c action s tha t mus t b e conducte dbefor e certificatio n ca n b e provided . You r lette r indicate daschedul e fo r aconteste dcas e hearin g tha t woul dexten dthroug h Januar y 18 , 2013 . EP A i s unabl e t o grant

an extensio n t o tha

t dat e as EP A expect s t o issu e the VG P i n Novembe r

201 2 t o compl y wit h asettlement agreement . However , EP A grant s a n extensio n t o Novembe r

30 , 201 2 whic h woul dallo w fo r summar y judgmen t

t o b e provide dunde r

the conteste dcas e schedule . I f b y Novembe r

30 , 2012 , Wisconsi n ha s no t acte dupo n th e certificatio n request , Wisconsi n wil l hav e waive dit s righ t

to certif y accordin g t o CW A § 401(a)(1 ) an dEP A wil l issu e the permi t fo r discharge s t o Wisconsi n water s (4 0 C.F.R . § 124.53) . I encourag e Wisconsi n t o certif y the VG P a t the earlies t

dat e possible . Than k yo u fo r you r cooperatio n o n thi s matter . I f yo u hav e an y questions , pleas e contac t me o r you r staf f ma y contac t

Sean Ramac h a

t (312 ) 886-5284 . Sincerely ,

Tink aG . Hyd e Director , Wate r

Divisio n

Recycled/Recyclabl e • Printe d wit h Vegetabl e Oi l Base d Ink s o n 100 % Recycle d Pape r(50 % Postconsumer )
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1

       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                         1,392,676
<SECURITIES>                   1,614,178
<RECEIVABLES>                  7,426,064
<ALLOWANCES>                      42,000
<INVENTORY>                   24,956,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              37,747,263
<PP&E>                        10,249,121
<DEPRECIATION>                 4,948,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                50,424,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          4,193,693
<BONDS>                       13,991,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                        7,396
<COMMON>                          31,919
<OTHER-SE>                    27,147,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  50,424,067
<SALES>                       21,495,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              21,495,161
<CGS>                         12,125,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 12,125,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               622,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  739,307
<INCOME-TAX>                     317,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              522,871
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     522,871
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .11
        


</TABLE>