alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPENDIX C

 Page 1

SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

DOCKET OST-2012-0069

SUMMARY INFORMATION

All applicants must submit this information with their proposal, along with a completed form SF424 on http:// 

www.grants.gov. 

A. APPLICANT INFORMATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

⁭ Not a Consortium ⁭ Interstate Consortium ⁭ Intrastate Consortium

⁭ Community now receives EAS subsidy

⁭ Community (or Consortium member) previously received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient: Date of Grant: ___________ Expiration date of grant: __________

Federal Funds Requested:

Carrier(s) Service Obtained:

Destination(s) Served:

B. PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: (LIST ORGANIZATION NAMES)

Public Private

1. Port of Chelan County 1.______________________________________

 2. Port of Douglas County 2.______________________________________

 3.____________________________________ 3.______________________________________

 4.____________________________________ 4.______________________________________

 5.____________________________________ 5.______________________________________

C. PROJECT PROPOSAL: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

⁭ Marketing ⁭ Upgrade Aircraft ⁭ New Route

⁭ Travel Bank ⁭ Service Restoration Subsidy

⁭ Surface Transportation ⁭ Regional Service Revenue Guarantee ⁭

Launch New Carrier Start Up Cost Offset First Service

Study ⁭ Secure Additional Carrier Other (explain below)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________
 APPENDIX C

 Page 2

⁭

D. EXISTING LANDING AIDS AT LOCAL AIRPORT:

⁭ Full ILS ⁭ Outer/Middle Marker ⁭ Published Instrument Approach

⁭ Localizer ⁭ Other (specify)

E. PROJECT COSTS: DO NOT ENTER TEXT IN SHADED AREA

LINE DESCRIPTION SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT

1 Federal amount requested 200,000

2 State cash financial contribution

Local cash financial contribution

3a Airport cash funds

3b Non-airport cash funds 40,000

3 Total local cash funds (3a +3b) 40,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1+2+3) 240,000

In-Kind contribution

5a Airport In-Kind contribution**

5b Other In-Kind contribution**

5 TOTAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION

(5a + 5b)

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+8) 240,000

F. IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS**

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 7b (Other In-Kind contribution), please describe the 

source(s) of fund(s) for each.
APPENDIX C

 Page 3

G. IS THIS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 

PROCESS?

⁭ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on

(date)___________________.

⁭ b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected by the State for review.

⁭ c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? (IF “YES”, PROVIDE EXPLANATION)

⁭ No ⁭ Yes (explain) 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Grafe , Jerom e (DEP )
Sent : To : Cc : From : Bria n Ganno n [briangannon.j@gmail.com ] Monday , Septembe r24 , 201 2 11:2 3 A M Fichter , Katherin e (DOT) ; Grafe , Jerom e (DEP ) Davey , Richar d (DOT ) Subject : Attachments : Blu e Line/Re d Lin e Extensio n Testimon y Blue_Line.Red_Line_Testimony[1].docx
Kennet h Kimmel l Katherin e Fitche r Jerom e Graff e 09/24/201 2 Dea rCommissione rKimmel l an d MDO TBoar d Members , Than k yo u fo rthi s opportunit yt o provid e testimon yo n th e critica l issu e o ffollowin g throug h wit h th e promise d Blu e lin e Re d lin e connector
. A s a forme rSomerville/Cambridg e resident ; an d a newe rhomeowne r i n Eas t Bosto n ( 3 years ) thi s Re d Line/Blu e Lin e connectio n i s a n essentia l missin g lin k i n Boston' s Subwa y service

. Isolate d fro m th e res t o fmetropolita n Bosto n du e t o th e harbo ran d th e tunnel s Eas tBosto n resident s nee d mor e opportunitie s t o connec t wit h othe rcommunitie s an d becom e a n easie rdestinatio n t o othe rcommunit yresidents

. Visitin g friend s fro m Cambridg e an d Somervill e currentl ypa y$3.5 0 jus tt o com e an d visi t m e i n m ycommunit ysinc e th e thre e Tconnection s mak e th e tri p arduous

. Additionall yman yo fEast Bosto n resident s wor k i n bot h th e tec h an d bi o industr ytha ti s boomin g i n Cambridg e bu tals o i n th e restaurant s an d hotel s as well

. Th e affordabilit yo fou rneighborhoo d an d th e valuabl e labo ri tprovide s t o th e entir e metro-Bosto n i s a hug e asse t t o smal l busines s owners . Pleas e conside rthi s connectio n an d th e positiv e economi cimpac t o n bot h th e businesse s tha templo ythes e worker s as wel l as th e improve d qualit yo f lif e o fEast Bosto n resident s wh o fil l thes e jobs

. Thi s connectio n i s onl ya fe wblocks , th e shor tter m impac to f it s constructio n wil l resul t i n lon g ter m positiv e environmenta l impacts , economi cimpacts , an d a bette r connecte d cit ywit h fewe rcar s o n th e road

. W e provid e th e entir e commonwealt h wit h Transportatio n an d bearin g th e burde n o fLoga n Airpor t an d it s impacts , w e als o pa ya tol l t o visi tou row n city , pleas e don' tskim p o n ou rpubli ctransportatio n needs

. Bria n Ganno n 19 8 Everet t Stree t East Bosto n M A0212 8 617-767-604 6

l
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7858 

AN ACT 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to establish 

a Medicare incident to modifier for mental health services 

furnished through telehealth and other telehealth services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7858 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telehealth Enhance3 ment for Mental Health Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘TELEMH 

4 Act of 2024’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICARE INCIDENT TO 

6 MODIFIER FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 

7 FURNISHED THROUGH TELEHEALTH AND 

8 OTHER TELEHEALTH SERVICES. 

9 Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 1395m(m)) is amended by adding at the end the 

11 following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(10) REQUIRED USE OF MODIFIERS IN CER13 TAIN INSTANCES.—Not later than January 1, 2026, 

14 the Secretary shall establish requirements to include 

15 a code or modifier, as determined appropriate by the 

16 Secretary, in the case of claims for telehealth serv17 ices under this subsection that are billed incident to 

18 a physician’s or practitioner’s professional service.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7858 

AN ACT 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to 

health and other telehealth services. mental health services furnished through teleestablish a Medicare incident to modifier for
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > State of the Economy and Policies for Full Employment

              																	United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee, 1956-					 and 	Eighty-Seventh Congress, 1961-1963. 						*State of the Economy and Policies for Full Employment : Hearings Before the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, Eighty-Seventh Congress, Second Session, Pursuant to Sec. 5(a) of Public Law 304 (79th Congress), August 7-10, 13-17, 20, 21, and 22, 1962*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										August 7-10, 13-17, 20, 21, and 22, 1962,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1214,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-06-00018- CR

Cl iffor d Le e G r ant , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-05 -20 2634 , HO NORAB LE WILF ORD F LOW ERS, JUDGE PRESI DING

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N A jury found appe llant Cli ffor d L ee G rant guilty o f ta mp e ringwith phy sical evide nce. SeeTe x. Pe n. Cod e Ann. § 37. 09 (We st 200 3)
. Th e tr ia l court a sse sse d p un ishme nt at f ive y e ars ’ imp ri so nme nt. Ap pe lla

nt’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d atto rn e y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ing

that th e a

pp eal is frivolous and without mer it. The brief meets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by

prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of t h e re co rd demonstrating why there are no arguable g rounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W. 2d 807 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 4 3 6 S. W. 2 d

1 3 7 ( T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 69 ). Ap pe lla nt r e c e ive d a

c op y of c ouns e l’ s b rief an d w a s a dv ise d o f h is r ig ht t o2

examine the appellate rec ord and f ile a pro se brief. N o pro se br ief or othe r written r esponse ha s been f iled. We have r eviewe d the re c o r d and counse l’s brief a

nd ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the r ecor d that might arguably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

____________________

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________ G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and Waldrop Affir med Filed: June 30, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices 

# Order

March 26, 2012

143661-2 & (40)(43)(45)(47)(48)(59)

In re Application of MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY to Increase Rates

_____________ _______________ _____________

ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES ADVOCATING TARIFF EQUITY, Appellee,

v SC: 143661 COA: 298830 Public Service Comm: 00-015985 MICHIGAN PUBLIC SE RVICE COMMISSION, Appellant, and

UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA AFL-CIO LOCAL 223, Appellee, and

MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

In re Application of MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY to Increase Rates

_____________ _______________ _____________ ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellee, Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 143662 COA: 298887 Public Service Comm: 00-015985I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

t0319 2

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SE RVICE COMMISSION, Appellant, and

UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA AFL-CIO LOCAL 223, Appellee, and

MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, a stipulation si gned by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of the applicatio n for leave to appeal the Ju ly 21, 2011 ju dgment of the Court of Appeals and the appli cation for leave to appeal as cross-appellant filed by the Michigan Consolidated Gas Company is consid ered. The application for leave to appeal and the Michigan Conso lidated Gas Company’s application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. The motions for leave to
file briefs amicus curiae are DENIED as moot . The application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant filed by the Attorney Genera l is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presente d should be reviewed by this Court.
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.1050 Audiometer. ( a ) *Identification.* An audiometer or automated audiometer is an electroacoustic device that produces controlled levels of test tones and signals intended for use in conducting diagnostic hearing evaluations and assisting in the diagnosis of possible otologic disorders.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II. Except for the otoacoustic emission device, the device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, if it is in compliance with American National Standard Institute S3.6-1996, “Specification for Audiometers,” and subject to the limitations in § 874.9.
[51 FR 40389, Nov. 6, 1986, as amended at 64 FR 14831, Mar. 29, 1999]
427 A.2d 1224

#### Commonwealth v. Collins, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, WIEAND and VAN der VOORT, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854883
<NAME>                        Edd Helms Group, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                               177,797
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,350,049
<ALLOWANCES>                          49,924
<INVENTORY>                          559,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,467,189
<PP&E>                             2,324,499
<DEPRECIATION>                     1,623,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     3,413,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,563,138
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                             126,545
<OTHER-SE>                         1,463,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       3,413,611
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   5,439,060
<CGS>                              3,994,388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      3,994,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,343,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    12,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       97,623
<INCOME-TAX>                             160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   97,463
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          97,463
<EPS-BASIC>                           .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .01


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

Confidential portions of this document indicated by ***** have been omitted and
filed separately with the Commission

TIFTON ALUMINUM COMPANY, INC.
P O Box 188
142 Tifton Drive
Delhi, Louisiana 71232

August 19, 2002

Mr. Gary Ihrke
V.P. Operations
Featherlite Trailers
P O Box 320
Cresco IA 52136

Dear Gary,

This letter will serve as confirmation of our agreement finalized today. ALCOA
has purchased, with your authorization, # pounds of aluminum for your extrusion
needs during the 2nd quarter of 2003. The extrusions will be purchased and
delivered from our Yankton plant at a base price of ***** per pound on solid
shapes, and ***** per pound on hollow shapes. As per our previous agreement, any
aide panels will require a ***** adder. All prices include delivery to Cresco,
IA. Featherlite will provide payment for each truckload via wire transfer at
point of shipment. We are reserving # pound per week to support your program.
The prices and tonnage stated above are firm, as metal has been secured to cover
this contract. Thanks again for your business

Yours Truly,
Herb Grubbs,
Regional Sales Manager
cc: Jan Mauch, Yankton
    Brian Plunk, Plant City
    File
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          56,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  700,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,032
<INVENTORY>                                  1,442,867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,205,867
<PP&E>                                         133,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,344,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,426,569
<BONDS>                                        720,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           580
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,344,506
<SALES>                                      2,839,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,839,382
<CGS>                                        2,719,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,719,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   703
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,599
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 98 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 98

 To designate the week beginning October 25, 1993, as ``National Child 
                        Safety Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 26 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

   Mr. Mitchell (for himself, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Chafee, Mr. 
 Cochran, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Conrad, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. Dole, Mr. Dorgan, 
    Mr. Gorton, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Inouye, Mr. 
  Lautenberg, Mr. Levin, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Moynihan, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
    Pell, Mr. Reid, Mr. Riegle, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Thurmond, and Mr. 
 Wellstone) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the week beginning October 25, 1993, as ``National Child 
                        Safety Awareness Week''.

Whereas there is a need to promote awareness of all aspects of child safety in 
        government, education, business, law enforcement, and private sectors 
        within each community of the United States;
Whereas a combined effort and national awareness will help to eliminate or 
        discourage possibly harmful or criminal actions against children;
Whereas statistics suggest an increase in incidents involving missing and 
        exploited children during the week preceding a holiday season; and
Whereas the children of the United States are our greatest resource and warrant 
        the protection necessary to ensure their healthy and happy lives: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of October 25, 
1993, through October 31, 1993, is designated as ``National Child 
Safety Awareness Week''. The President is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe the week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10355

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ANTONIO CASTILLO-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-265-1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Antonio Castillo-Mendoza has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Castillo-Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 26, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10355 Document: 00515215753 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/26/2019
No. 19-10355

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10355 Document: 00515215753 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/26/2019