alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.19

[Cenveo logo]



                                               November 8, 2006




Mr. Robert G. Burton
One Canterbury Green
Stamford, Connecticut 06901

Dear Bob:

         Reference is made to the employment agreement (the "Employment
Agreement"), dated October 27, 2005, between you and Cenveo, Inc. (the
"Company"). This letter agreement (the "Amendment") will serve to amend the
Employment Agreement in the following respects, effective as of the date of
this letter. (Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the
same meaning as in the Employment Agreement.)

         1. The first sentence of Section 1 ("Terms of Employment") of the
Employment Agreement is amended to extend the Term of the Employment Agreement
by two years by replacing the date "December 31, 2008," with the date
"December 31, 2010."

         2. The first sentence of Section 2(a) ("Base Salary") of the
Employment Agreement is amended to increase the rate of your annual Base
Salary by replacing the amount "$950,000" with the amount "$1,000,001."

         3. The second sentence of Section 2(b) ("Annual Incentive Bonus") of
the Employment Agreement is amended to increase your annual bonus opportunity
by replacing the percentage "200%" with the percentage "300%" immediately
preceding the words "of your Base Salary."

         The Employment Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect.
This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will
constitute an original, and all of which together will constitute one and the
same.

         If the foregoing terms and conditions are acceptable and agreed to by
you, please sign the line provided below to signify such acceptance and
agreement and return the executed copy to the undersigned.



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                             2


                               CENVEO, INC.


                               By:    /s/  Patrice M. Daniels
                                      -----------------------
                               Name:  Patrice M. Daniels
                               Title: Director and Chairperson of Compensation
                                      Committee



Accepted and Agreed this
8th day of November, 2006.

/s/  Robert G. Burton, Sr.
--------------------------
Robert G. Burton, Sr.
#### § 1.383-2 Limitations on certain capital losses and excess credits in computing alternative minimum tax. [Reserved]
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 110

Relating to the purchase of calendars.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 20 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. FORD, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported the

following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

MAY 21 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to the purchase of calendars.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration is authorized to expend from the contingent fund

3 of the Senate, upon vouchers approved by the chairman

4 of that committee, not to exceed $76,960 for the purchase

5 of one hundred and four thousand 1994 ‘‘We The People’’

6 calendars. The calendars shall be distributed as prescribed

7 by the committee.

Æ
Unassociated Document


Exhibit
10.5





January 16,
2007




Mr.
Richard R. Grigg







Dear
Dick,




Based
on our discussions we have mutually agreed to extend the expiration date of your
July 20, 2004 agreement (“Agreement”) from August 20, 2007, to March 31, 2008.
Each party shall maintain the ability to terminate the Agreement for any reason
upon written notice given sixty days in advance.




In
consideration of the foregoing, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged
by the parties, paragraph two under subsection (e) of your Agreement shall be
amended to read as follows, with all other terms remaining as
written:




Your
eligibility to participate in the health care and group life insurance coverages
under the Flexible Benefits Plan will begin January 1, 2007. Moreover, at the
conclusion of your employment with the Company, you will be granted the maximum
credit (currently 85 points) for purposes of determining the company
contribution toward the cost of retiree health care coverage under the Flexible
Benefits Plan or any successor plan, so long as retiree health care is provided
under the Flexible Benefits Plan and a company contribution is provided to other
senior executive officers of FirstEnergy.




In the
event of your death as an active employee, health care coverage for your
surviving spouse will be obtained and provided at substantially the same
coverage level and participant contribution level as available to active
employees through March 31, 2008. Thereafter, health care coverage would be
provided to your surviving spouse on the same terms and conditions as provided
to other surviving spouses under the terms of the Flexible Benefits
Plan.




In
addition, subsection (i) of your Agreement shall be amended to read as follows,
with all other terms remaining as written:




You
will be entitled to the financial planning benefits available to other senior
executive officers during your employment with the Company, and will be entitled
to continue to receive the financial planning benefits for one (1) year
following the date of your retirement. 




If the
above is agreeable to you, please sign where indicated and return a copy to me
for our records. You should retain a copy for yourself. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call. 

 

 


	 	 Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 Anthony J. Alexander
	
       

      So Agreed:
      ________________________________
	 
	 
      Date:______________________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 119 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 119

 To commend the Women's Track Team of Louisiana State University (LSU) 
 for winning the 1993 National Collegiate Athletic Association Outdoor 
  Track Championship, and for other achievements over the past seven 
                                 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 17 (legislative day, June 15), 1993

   Mr. Johnston (for himself and Mr. Breaux) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To commend the Women's Track Team of Louisiana State University (LSU) 
 for winning the 1993 National Collegiate Athletic Association Outdoor 
  Track Championship, and for other achievements over the past seven 
                                 years.

Whereas the Women's Track Team of Louisiana State University has completed 
        another outstanding season in which they have swept all four major 
        championships;
Whereas the Lady Tiger Track Team of LSU has, for the past seven years, 
        dominated their sport to a degree rarely seen in the history of 
        collegiate athletics;
Whereas the LSU Lady Tigers have swept the Indoor and Outdoor Southeastern 
        Conference and NCAA Championships in four of the last seven years;
Whereas the LSU Lady Tigers have won the NCAA Outdoor Championship for seven 
        straight years;
Whereas the twelve members of the 1993 LSU Lady Tigers combined to win twenty 
        All-American awards;
Whereas Women's Track Coach Pat Henry has done an outstanding job of leading the 
        Lady Tigers for the past six seasons; and
Whereas the LSU Lady Tigers won the 1993 Indoor and Outdoor Track Championships: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate commends the Lady Tigers of Louisiana 
State University for winning the 1993 National Collegiate Athletic 
Association Indoor and Outdoor Championships, and for their tremendous 
achievements over the past seven years.

                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7221

EDDIE HARRELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versusCALVIN ANTHONY, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-510-9-13) Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eddie Harrell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Respondents and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000).We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harrell v. Anthony , No. CA-00-510-9-13 (D.S.C. July 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
dep 

west virginia department of environmental protection 

Executive Office 

601 Sib ST SE 

Charleston, WV 24304 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin (3RAOO) 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 3 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

May 6, 2015 

Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor 

Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary 

www.dep.wv.gov 

Re: Marshall, WV Nonattainment Area S02 Base Year (2011) Emission Inventory 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

The State of West Virginia is requesting that the U.S. EPA approve, as a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), the 2011 Sulfur Dioxide (S02) inventory for the Marshall, WV 

nonattainment area as meeting the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 1 72( c )(3 ). 

The request is detailed in the enclosed hardcopy: Marshall, WV Nonattainment Area S02 Base 

Year (2011) Emission Inventory and the supporting documentation is provided in electronic 

format, on the enclosed compact disc. We certify that the electronic copies include exact 

duplicates of the hardcopy. The electronic copies also furnish additional information, which has 

not been presented in hardcopy form. We certify that the public hearing required by 40 CFR 

§51.1 02(AO was held in accordance with the applicable state laws and the requirements of 40 

CFR §51.102(d). U.S. EPA was notified at the beginning ofthe public comment period. Please 

contact William F. Durham, Director, Division of Air Quality at (304) 926-0462, if you have any 

questions or need additional information. 

Enclosures 

cc: Diana Escher (3APOO) 

Marilyn Powers 

William F. Durham 

Sincerely, 

Promoting a healthy environment.
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.4770 Otoscope. ( a ) *Identification.* An otoscope is a device intended to allow inspection of the external ear canal and tympanic membrane under magnification. The device provides illumination of the ear canal for observation by using an AC- or battery-powered light source and an optical magnifying system.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 874.9 only when used in the external ear canal.
[55 FR 48440, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 1122, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38801, July 25, 2001]
# C_2020339EN.01001001.xml

| 12.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Infineon Technologies v Commission

(Case T-758/14 RENV) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for smart card chips - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Exchanges of commercially sensitive information - Unlimited jurisdiction - Calculation of the amount of the fine - Taking into consideration of the participation only in a part of a network of bilateral contacts between competitors)

(2020/C 339/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Infineon Technologies AG (Neubiberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Dreher, T. Lübbig and M. Klusmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan, A. Dawes and J. Norris, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 6250 final of 3 September 2014 relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39574 — Smart Card Chips) or, in the alternative, for a reduction in the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Infineon Technologies by subparagraph (a) of the first paragraph of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2014) 6250 final of 3 September 2014 relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39574 — Smart Card Chips) at EUR 76 871 600; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Infineon Technologies by subparagraph (a) of the first paragraph of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2014) 6250 final of 3 September 2014 relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39574 — Smart Card Chips) at EUR 76 871 600;

| 2. | Orders Infineon Technologies and the European Commission to bear their own costs, including those incurred in the original proceedings before the General Court in Case T-758/14, those incurred in the appeal proceedings in Case C-99/17 P and those incurred in the proceedings referred back to the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Infineon Technologies and the European Commission to bear their own costs, including those incurred in the original proceedings before the General Court in Case T-758/14, those incurred in the appeal proceedings in Case C-99/17 P and those incurred in the proceedings referred back to the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.

---
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 136

‘‘To refer S. 1325 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Horace Martin’’, to

the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims for

a report thereon.’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. THURMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Reported by Mr. BIDEN, with an amendment and an amendment to the title

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in Italic.]

OCTOBER 4 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 12), 1994

Considered, amended, and agreed to

RESOLUTION

‘‘To refer S. 1325 entitled ‘‘A bill for the relief of Horace

Martin’’, to the Chief Judge of the United States Court

of Federal Claims for a report thereon.’’.

1 Resolved, That the bill (S. 1325) entitled ‘‘A bill for

2 the relief of Horace Martin’’, now pending in the Senate,

3 together with all accompanying papers, is referred to the

4 Chief Judge of the United States Claims Court. The Chief

5 Judge shall proceed with the same in accordance with the

6 provisions of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United
2

SRES 136 ATS

1 States Code, and report back to the Senate, at the earliest

2 practicable date, giving such finding of fact and conclu3 sions that are sufficient to inform Congress of the amount,

4 if any, legally or equitably due from the United States to

5 the claimant.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: IRS redesignated the following sections to appear below the undesignated center heading “Regulations Applicable to Certain Bonds Sold Prior to July 8, 1997” and preceding the undesignated center heading “Deductions for Personal Exemptions.” See 62 FR 25507 and 25513, May 9, 1997 for the specific sections involved in the redesignation.

§ 1.408A-2 Establishing Roth IRAs. This section sets forth the following questions and answers that provide rules applicable to establishing Roth IRAs: Q-1 . Who can establish a Roth IRA?
A-1 . Except as provided in A-3 of this section, only an individual can establish a Roth IRA. In addition, in order to be eligible to contribute to a Roth IRA for a particular year, an individual must satisfy certain compensation requirements and adjusted gross income limits (see § 1.408A-3 A-3).
Q-2 . How is a Roth IRA established?
A-2 . A Roth IRA can be established with any bank, insurance company, or other person authorized in accordance with § 1.408-2(e) to serve as a trustee with respect to IRAs. The document establishing the Roth IRA must clearly designate the IRA as a Roth IRA, and this designation cannot be changed at a later date. Thus, an IRA that is designated as a Roth IRA cannot later be treated as a traditional IRA. However, see § 1.408A-4 A-1(b)(3) for certain rules for converting a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA with the same trustee by redesignating the traditional IRA as a Roth IRA, and see § 1.408A-5 for rules for recharacterizing certain IRA contributions.
Q-3 . Can an employer or an association of employees establish a Roth IRA to hold contributions of employees or members?
A-3 . Yes. Pursuant to section 408(c), an employer or an association of employees can establish a trust to hold contributions of employees or members made under a Roth IRA. Each employee's or member's account in the trust is treated as a separate Roth IRA that is subject to the generally applicable Roth IRA rules. The employer or association of employees may do certain acts otherwise required by an individual, for example, establishing and designating a trust as a Roth IRA.
Q-4 . What is the effect of a surviving spouse of a Roth IRA owner treating an IRA as his or her own?
A-4 . If the surviving spouse of a Roth IRA owner treats a Roth IRA as his or her own as of a date, the Roth IRA is treated from that date forward as though it were established for the benefit of the surviving spouse and not the original Roth IRA owner. Thus, for example, the surviving spouse is treated as the Roth IRA owner for purposes of applying the minimum distribution requirements under section 408(a)(6) and (b)(3). Similarly, the surviving spouse is treated as the Roth IRA owner rather than a beneficiary for purposes of determining the amount of any distribution from the Roth IRA that is includible in gross income and whether the distribution is subject to the 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t).
[T.D. 8816, 64 FR 5601, Feb. 4, 1999]
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Foraminifera and stratigraphy of the upper part of the 
Pierre Shale and lower part of the Fox Hills Sandstone (Cretaceous), 
north-central South Dakota

#### Professional Paper 611

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 
  1**                                (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp611 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:57
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time: Thursday, January 14, 2010, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items To Be Discussed

Correction and Approval of Minutes Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-27: 
American Future Fund Political Action by its counsel, Jason Torchinsky.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-29: Retiree Support Group of Contra Costa 
County by its counsel, L. Douglas Pipes.

Management and Administrative Matters

    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Darlene Harris, Deputy Commission Secretary, at (202) 
694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

Person to Contact for Information: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Darlene Harris,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-411 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M