2 

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g



# Energ yCo nservation Standards for General S e rvice Fluorescent Lamps and Incandescent Reflector Lamps ANOPR Public Meeting L i fe-Cy c le Cost Analy s i s Buildi ng Te c hnolo g ie s Prog ra m Office o fEn er g yEfficien c y an d Ren ew a ble En erg y U.S. De pa rtme nt of Ene r gy March 10-1 1 , 2008



## ANOPR An al y ses Fl o w Diagram
Fr amew o r k Document AN O P R NOPR Fi n a l Rul e

N a ti o nal Imp a ct An al y s i s En er g yU s e Cha r a c t e riz a tion Ma rke tand T e chno l o gy Assess ment Scr e en i n g An al y s i s E n gi ne e r i n g An al y s i s Pr o duct Pr i c e De t e rm i n a t ion Li fe- C y c l e Cost a n d Pay b ack Per i o d A n al y s i s

Shi p m ents An al y s i s

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g



## Purpose  En erg yUse Ch aract erizati o n 

# • To develop energ y consumption estimates fo r the lamp orlamp-an d -ballast sy ste m s selected in the engineering analy s is.


##  Life -Cy c leCos ta nd Pa y b ac k Pe riod A n aly s e s 

# • To develop the customerlife-c y cle cost savings a nd pa y back perio d fo r higher

efficiency lamps.

3

Energ yUse Cha r acteriza t io n 

## Energ yUse Characteri z ation  En erg yU se = Op eratin g Hou r s x Po w e r  Dis t ribution o fOpe r a t ing H ours deve loped by 

# • Lamp t y pe (i.e. , GSFL, IRL ) 

# • Sector (i.e., Residential, Commer c ia l, Industrial) 

# • Build i ng t y pe 

# • Region (9 census divi sions, 4 large states) 

###  Po w e r Deve lope d in Eng i ne e r ing A n a l y s i s 

# • For IRL: lamp w a ttage 

# • For GSFL : s y s t e m po w e r : depen ds on balla st fact or and lamp w a tt age

4

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Energ yUse Cha r acteriza t io n 

## Reside ntial Sector Op erating Ho u r s  2002 U.S. L i gh tin g Market Ch aract erizati o n Vol I.: 

# • Average operatin g hours b ybuilding t y pe (e .g ., mo bile home, single family

detached, single family a ttached ) and lamp t y pe (i.e., IRL ) . 

###  2001 Re sid e n t ial En erg yCo n s u m p t io n Sur ve y 

# • Probability a cert ain build ing t y pe resides in one of nine censu s divisions and fourlarge sta t es. 

###  Op eratin g Hou r s o f Ave r ag e IRL : 884 h r s/y e ar  Se ns iti v ityusing hig h a n d l o w o p e r a t ing hours byroom ty pe : 

# • 1,210 h r s/ yea r (i.e., lamp placed in kitchen of a single-family de tached) 

# • 183 hrs/ y e a r(i.e ., lamp placed in the closet of a m u lti-family 2 - 4 unit)

5

Energ yUse Cha r acteriza t io n 

## Commercial Sector Op erating Ho u r s  2002 U.S. L i gh tin g Market Ch aract erizati o n Vol I.: 

# • Average operatin g hours b ybuilding t y pe (e.g ., of fice, re f r igerated w a rehouse,

lodg ing, food sales) and lamp t y p e (e .g. , IRL, GSF L ) 

###  2003 Co m m er cial Bu ildin g En erg yCo n s u m p t io n Su r ve y 

# • Probability a cert ain build ing t y pe resides in one of nine censu s divisions and fourlarge sta t es. 

###  Op eratin g Hou r s o f Ave r ag e IRL : 3,450 h r s/ y e a r  Op eratin g Hou r s o f Ave r ag e GSF L : 3,435 h r s/y e ar

6

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Energ yUse Cha r acteriza t io n 

## Sample Co mmercial S ector Operatin g Ho urs Distrib u ti o n 20%Commercial SectorGSFLProbability 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 1 2

16 15 14 13

4 5

6
7 8 11 12

17 18 25 26

1: Vacant 2: Off i ce 4: Laboratory 5: N onr efrigerated w a rehouse 6: Food sales 7: Publi cor der and safet y 8: Out pati ent heal th ca r e 11: Refrigerated w a rehouse 12: Rel i gi ous worshi p 13: Public as sembly 14: E duc at i o n 15: Food s e rv i c e 16: Inpatie nt heal t h care 17: N u rsing 18: Lod ging 25: R e tail other than mall 26: Servic e 91: Other

913,5453,6864,9733,4605,2243,5703,3313,8191,7052,5702,6434,5985,7514,3853,7803,6813,3943,638 Ann u a l Op erat in g Ho ur s b yBu il di n g Ty pe (h rs/ year) 7

Energ yUse Cha r acteriza t io n 

## Ind ustrial Sector Operatin g Ho urs  2002 U.S. L i gh tin g Market Ch aract erizati o n Vol I.: 

# • Average operatin g hours b ybuilding t y pe (e.g ., pri n ting and publish i ng, textile

mill, fabricated m e tal products) an d lamp t y pe (e.g . , IRL , GSFL ) 

###  2002 Man u f a c tu rer En erg y Co n s u m p t io n Su r ve y 

# • Probability a cert ain build ing t y pe resides in the country 

###  2007 Cen s u s 

# • Probability a cert ain build ing t y pe resides in censu s division or large state 

###  Op eratin g Hou r s o f Ave r ag e IRL : 4,664 hrs/ y e a r  Op eratin g Hou r s o f Ave r ag e GSF L : 4,795 h r s/y e ar 

## DOE reques ts feedback o n whe t her the average op era t ing hours deri ve d are a reas onable es tim a tion o f thei r end-us es. ( I ss ue #6 ) 8

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

9 

## Flu o rescen t Sy stem Pow e r Ratin g  DOE c a l c u la te d s y s t e m po w e r ra ting us in g pu blis he d c a t a l og da ta .  T o estimate system p o w e r fo r a ran g eo f b a llast facto r s w i th similar attrib u t es (BEF , T HD, etc.), DOE d e ve lo p e d a lin ear fit.  Examp l e: 3-la mp 32W4-fo ot T 8 120V Ballasts w i th T HD < 20% , PF > 0 .95, an d BEF 0.98 - 1 .02 Linear Fit: m=89. 8, b=8.5



## DOE invites comments o n the sys tem power ra ting of the lamp-and-ba llas t sy s t

em s analy z

ed.(Issue # 7 ) 60 .0 70 .0 80 .0 90 .0 10 0. 0 11 0. 0

0. 70 0. 7 5 0. 80 0. 8 5 0. 90 0. 9 5 1 . 00 B a l l a st F a ct o rSystemPower Rating(W) Energ yUse Cha r acteriza t io n

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Life -Cy c le Cost a nd Pa y back Peri od Anal y s e s  Purpose: To deve lop the custom er l i fe-cy c le cost (LCC) sav ings and pa y b ack peri od (PBP) for higher e ffici enc y produc t compared to the b aselin eproduct.

10

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

11 

###  LCC e qua ls c ons ume rpric eplus thes u m of ope ra tin g c o s t s discounted t o a particular base y e ar.  Ec onomic ev alua tion from t h ec ons ume rpe rs pe c t i ve .  A n al ysis imp l emen ted in an Excel ® 

### sp rea d sh eet.  Resu lts are e x p ressed as L CC sa v i n g s (b aselin e min u s can d i d a te efficien c yle v e l).  Simp le Pay b a ck Perio d (PBP, y e a r s) is also calcu lated an d rep o rted in th is analy s i s . Firs t Cos t (Consu m erPric e +

Ins t al la tio n Co st)



### Op eratin g Ex pe ns e s Co mb in e Ch an g es in Costs

LCC Results Convert to Prese n t Value Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Me th od

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Approach
 T h ean aly s is o n l yco n s id ers co n s u m er c h o i ces th at sav e en erg y : 

# • Reduced-w a t t ag e lamps 

# • Lamp and ballast combinations that have reduced sy ste m po w e r 

###  Vario u s e ven t s th at trig g e r th e p u r ch asing o fa lamp are co n s id ered .  Va ry ing life t i m e s a m ong la mp de s i gns re quire s theus eof a re s i dua l va l u e .  Dis t ributions a r ec o rre l a t e d in a n a l y s is (e .g., ope ra ting hours , s a l e s tax, an d electricityp r ices a r e co rrelated b yr e g i o n ) .

12

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Events Trig gering th e Purchase o f Lamp  Various ev ents that trigger the purc hasi ng of a lamp inv o lve different consumer ec o nomics. DOE anal yzes five su ch events: IRL 

##  ; Lamp F a il ure - alamp fails a n d must be repl aced. Standards-In d u ced Retrofit - an incre a se in t he efficac y sta ndard prompts end- u s ers to retrofit lamps and b a ll a s ts w her e, in the base case, the y w o ul d oth e r w ise o n l yrep l ace the lam p . GSFL 

## ; ;  ; Ballast Fail ure - an existing b a llast fails an d the consum er p u rchases a ne w lam p and ball a st. 

##  ; Ballast Retrofit – c onsumers w ho w e re g o in g to voluntari l y r e trofit their existing l a mp a nd bal lasts do so, and at certain CSLs ar e i m pacted b y bein g forced to a higher stan d a rd. 

## ; ; Ne w Co nstructi on and R enov a t ion - a ll the ne w fi xture i n stall a tions w h ere the lighti ng des ign w i ll be n e w or can be com p letel yrec onfig ured. 13

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Detailed Su mmar y of Tri ggering Eve n ts for T 12 BaselineLam p s Even t Base Case A c ti on Standards Case A c t i on Lamp F a ilur e (a) In stall s a T12 la mp. In stall s a l o w e r-w attage , hig h e r e ffi ca cy lamp , w her e the sy stem ligh to u tpu tne v e r dro p s below10 per ce nt o fthe b a s elin e sy stem . (b) In stall s a T12 la mp.
In stall s a T12 o r T8 el ectr oni c ball a st a n d lamp , w her e the sy stem ligh to u tpu tne v e r dro p s below10 per ce nt o fthe b a s elin e sy stem . Stan da rd s- In du ce d Ret r of it Repla c e T1 2 l a mp hal fw a y t h r o ug h an a l ys i s per i o d. Ballast Fail ur e In stall s a T12 el e c tr onic balla st an d l a mp s in th e ex isting fixt ure . Ballast Retrof it In stall s a T8 ele ctr o n ic b a lla st and lam p s i n th e ex isti ng fixt ure . NewConstru c ti on and Ren o v a tion In stall s a new T1 2 sy stem (only ap plie s to T12 HO sy stem s) In stall s a new T1 2 or T8 sy stem tha t is w here th e sy ste m li gh t ou tp ut n e v e r dro p s below10 per ce nt o fthe b a s elin e sy stem . Lig h t ou tp u t can be m a in tai ned t h r o ug h s p ac in g. 14

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Detailed Su mmar y of Tri ggering Eve n ts for T 8 Ba seline L a mp s Even t Base Case A c ti on Standards Case A c t i on Lamp F a ilur e In stall s a T8 lam p . In stall s a l o w e r-w attage , hig h e r effica cy lamp , w her e th e sy stem li gh t ou tpu tn e v e r d r o p s below10 per ce n t of the ba selin e sy stem. Ballast Fail ur e In stall s a T8 electroni c b a lla st a n d lamp s i n the ex istin g fixt ure . In stall s newT8 b a llast an d l a mp s, w here th e sy ste m li gh t ou tp ut n e v e r dro p s below10 per ce nt o fthe b a s elin e sy stem . Ne w Co n s tr uc t i o n an d Renov ation In stall s a new T8 sy stem . In stall s a newT8 sy stem , w her e the sy stem lig ht ou tp ut nev er dro p s below 1 0 p e rc e n t of th e ba se l i n e s y s t e m . Ligh t ou tpu t can be main tain ed t h r o ug h s p ac in g.

15

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Residu al Value  T o co mp are th e life-cy cle c o st o ftw o p r od u c ts, o n emust e valu a te the m o ver thes a m epe riod of time(i.e . , a n a l y s is pe riod).  The analy s is period must be b ased on the lifetime of the product be ing re gu la te d.  To account f o r va ry ing lifetimes among lamp designs, DOE uses a re s i dua l va lue (prora ting t h e v a lueof there ma ining l i fe of the l a m p or ballast).  There s i dua l va lueis a n e s t i m a t eof theproduc t’s va lueto the co n s u m er at th e en d o fth e life-c y c le co st an alysis p e rio d . L CC = In stalled Co st + Op er ating Co st – Residua l Value 

## DOE se eks c o mment on the use o f r

esidual v a lue and on other possible appr oaches to ca lcula t ing li fe-c ycle cos t s fo r produc ts with varying lifetim es. (I ssue #8) 16

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## T12 Lamp F a ilure (a ) Cash Fl ow s Lamp Purchase : Opera t ing Expense: Lamp Residua l Value: Baseline T12 La mp on M a g n e t i c B a l l a st: 5 year Ser v i c e - L i fe 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 17 Standards - Co m p lian t Reduced Wa t t age T12 Lamp on Mag n e t ic Ballast : 6 year Ser v i c e - L i fe

18 Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## LCC Ca lcul atio n Fl ow c hart

E n d-U ser Prod uctPrice
Sa le s Ta x Fi nal P r od uc t Pr ic e In s t a l l a ti on

Co s t To t a l I n st al l e d Co s t

E l ect ri c i ty Pr ic e s An n u a l E l ectr i c i ty Us ag e Co st PB P

E l e c t r ic it y P r i ce T r end
D i s c ou nt R a t e

Anal ysi s Pe r i o d Op era t i n g C o s tOver An al y s i s Pe r i o d

R e pl ace m e nt

Co s t R esi dual Va lu e LC C

Po w e rRa t i n g Op e r a t i n g H our s Prod uct Li f e t i m e Se r v ic e Li f e En e r g y C o ns um p t io n

To t a l Repl a cem en t

Co s t Cal c ul ated

Va l u e L CC I n p u t LC C Out put Legen d Fr om P r oduc t P r ic e Determination

Fr om E n e r gy Us e Ch aract eriz at io n Fr om E ngine e r ing

An a l y s i s

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Total Ins t all ed Cos t s  T o t al In stalled Co sts = Retail Price + In stallatio n Co st  Equipme n t Re ta il Pric e= E n d-Us e rProduc t Pric e+ Sa le s Ta x 

# • End-User Produc t Price and Sales Tax developed in the Pr oduct Pr ice Deter m ination . 

###  In stallatio n costs rep r e sen t th e lab o rn ecessar yto in stall th e lamp o r ballast.



# • Labor Times ( mi nutes):

– G SFL: 2000 Ballast Rule (depend s on lamp t y pe, w e ighted averag e group

and spot)

– I RL: 2007 RS Me ans Ele c trical Co st Data. (D OE assumes no installation

costs forIRL in t he residential se ctor. ) 

# • Labor Rate ($/h r ) :

– Lamp Replacement: U . S. Bu reau of Labo rStatistics- General Maintenance

Worker($15 .49/ hr )

– Lamp and Ballast Replacement: 2 007 RS Means-E lectrician and Ele c trician ’ s

Helper ($53.88 /h r ) 19

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Installa tio n Costs an d the 2005 Na tional Elec tric Cod e
 The 2005 Nati onal Electric Code re quires a means for disconnecting lumina ire s ins t a lle d in doors .  T h i s n ewrequiremen tma ya ffect th e lab o rtime to in stall a flu o r escen t lamp ballast. 

## DOE se eks c o mment on aver age labo r times and l a bor ra tes. Specifica lly , DOE reques ts comme n t on how labo r times wi ll b e affec t ed by the 200 5 Na ti onal Elec tric Code. (Issue #9 )

20

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## ElectricityPrices  Electricit yPrices 

# • Based on EIA Form 861 Data 

# • Develo ped for13 regions: 9 censu s divisions and 4 large states. Geographic A r ea Res . E l ec (2 006 $ / kWh) Comm. Ele c (2 006 $ / kW h) Ind. Elec (2 006 $ / kWh) Ne wE n gl an d $0
. 1 29 $0
. 105 $0
. 094 Mid d le A t lan t ic (e x c lude s NY) $0
. 1 10 $0
. 088 $0
. 059 E a s tNo rt h Ce n t r a l $0
. 0 87 $0
. 075 $0
. 054 W e stNo rt h Ce n t r a l $0
. 0 82 $0
. 070 $0
. 075 So ut h Atl anti c( e x c l u d e s FL) $0
. 0 86 $0
. 074 $0
. 054 East S o uth C e ntr a l $0
. 0 78 $0
. 078 $0
. 065 W e s tS o uth C e ntr a l ( e x c l u d e s T X ) $0
. 0 86 $0
. 079 $0
. 065 Mo un ta i n $0
. 0 89 $0
. 080 $0
. 058 Paci f i c ( e x c lud e s CA) $0
. 0 86 $0
. 084 $0
. 050 Ne wYo rk S t a t e $0
. 1 60 $0
. 097 $0
. 056 Ca li fo rn i a $0
. 0 99 $0
. 087 $0
. 078 Te x a s $0
. 1 13 $0
. 106 $0
. 095 Florid a $0
. 1 29 $0
. 121 $0
. 090 Weight ed Average Pr ice s $0 . 1 00 $0 . 086 $0 . 070 21

22 

## ElectricityPrice Trend s Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses


###  Electricit yPrice T r en d 

# • Energ y p r ice projections to 2030 b a sed on EIA/AEO Refe rence Ca se 

# • AEO High Gro wt h and Lo w Gro wt h cases can be r un as a sensitivity

0.85 0.87 0.89 0.91 0.93 0.95 0.97 0.99 1.01 1.03 1.05

2004 2006 2 008 2 010 2 012 2 014 20 16 20 18 2 020 2 022 2 024 2 026 20 28 20 30 20 32 Ye a rPriceTrend (2006=1) Hi g h G

ro wt h
- R

e s Re f er

e n

c e - Re s Lo w Gro wt h
- R

e s Hi

g h G

ro wt h
- C o m m R e f

er

e n

ce- C o m m Lo w Gro wt h
- C o m m Hi

gh

G

ro wt h
- Ind R e f

ere n c e - In d Lo w Gro wt h
- In

d

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Discou nt Rates  Based on the finance cost of raising funds to purchase products 

# • Financia l cost of an y debt incurre d to pu rchase p r oduct 

# • Oppo rtunit ycost of an y equit yused to pu rchase p r oduct 

###  Re s i de ntia l Ra te s 

# • Weighted-averag e real rate associat ed w i th various household equity (e.g ., sav i ngs bonds, stocks, CDs) and debt (e.g ., credit card, ho me equit yloans) 

# • Primary data source: Federal Reserve Board’s Surv ey of Consu m er Finances forthe y e a r s 198 9, 1992, 1995, 1 998, 2001, and 2 004 

# • Average Residen tial D i scou n t Rat e : 5.6 % 

###  Comme rc ia l a nd I ndus tria l Ra te s 

# • Calcu l ated from t he w e ighted-ave r age cost ofcapital to the firm (W ACC) to obtain equity and debt financing. 

# • Cost of Equit ycalcu l ated using th e Capital Asset Pricing Model. 

# • Cost of Deb tcalculated b y adding a risk adjustment facto r to the cu rr ent y i eld on long-ter m corpo r ate bonds. 

# • Average Comme rcial D i sco unt Rate: 6. 2 % 

# • Average Indust r ial Discount Rate: 7.5 % 23

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Other In pu ts  La mp Life time : 

# • GS FL:

– M anufactu ring Literatu re: rated life fo r a 3-h rsta rt

– 2000 Ballast Rule: g r oup and spo t re -lamping rate s (g roup replacements

are made at 75 % of ra ted life) 

# • IRL: Manufactu ring literature 

###  Ballast Lifetime 

# • 2000 Ballast Rule: 49,054 hrs 

###  Re pa ir a nd Ma inte na nc eCos t s 

# • No repair o rmaintenance costs are included 

# • DOE does account fo rlamp replacements 

###  A n al ysis Peri o d 

# • Time span over w h ich life-c y c le cost is calculated 

# • Based on the longest-lived base line lamp in a pro duct class. 

# • The analy s is period in y ears is equal to the life oft he lamp in hours divided by the annual opera t ing hours ofthe lamp fora given sector o r building . 24

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## 3-l a mp 4 - foot M e dium Bi pin 34W T12 Baselin e Standard s-I nduced Re tr ofi t LCC and PBP Results

CSL Lamp Ef f i cacy

lm

/W Desi gn O p ti on LC C $ LC C Sa v i ngs

$ In s t a l le d Pri c e

$ Op e r a t in g Cost Sa v i ngs

$ Pa y b ack Per i od

yr M ean Lumen From Basel i n e

% Bas e l i n e 77 . 9 34 W T 1 2 & 0 . 88 B F Ma g 1 38. 3 5 N/A 11 . 0 4 N/A N/A 0.0

CS L1 82 . 4 3 4 W T1 2 & 0.8 8 BF El ec 1 56. 3 5 - 18. 0 0 65 . 9 3 4.4 4 12 . 4 7.0 CS L2 85 . 3 3 4 W T1 2 & 0.8 6 BF El ec 1 61. 7 1 - 23. 3 6 72 . 9 6 4.8 1 12 . 9 10 . 9 CS L2 86 . 2 3 2 .5 W T8 & 0. 8 8 BF El ec 1 44. 6 5 -6 . 3 1 56 . 5 2 5.5 6 8.2 9.6 CS L3 90 . 8 3 2 .5 W T8 & 0. 7 8 BF El ec 1 36. 7 4 1.6 0 59 . 6 2 8.0 0 6.1 4.4 CS L3 91 . 2 3 4 W T1 2 & 0.8 6 BF El ec 1 62. 0 0 - 23. 6 6 76 . 1 5 4.8 1 13 . 5 18 . 5 CS L4 92 . 3 3 2 .5 W T8 & 0. 7 5 BF El ec 1 32. 0 9 6.2 6 60 . 0 5 8.7 3 5.6 5.6 CS L4 95 . 0 3 0 W T8 & 0.7 8 BF El e c 1 33. 3 4 5.0 1 60 . 9 0 9.6 7 5.2 3.3 CS L5 95 . 4 3 2 .5 W T8 & 0. 7 5 BF El ec 1 33. 4 7 4.8 8 61 . 6 1 8.7 3 5.8 8.0 CS L5 97 . 3 2 8 W T8 & 0.7 8 BF El e c 1 21. 3 8 16 . 9 6 60 . 3 0 12 . 1 6 4.1 -1 . 3 CS L5 96 . 0 2 5 W T8 & 0.8 8 BF El e c 1 25. 1 3 13 . 2 2 64 . 6 6 11 . 1 8 4.8 -0 . 9
25

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## 3-l a mp 4 - foot M e dium Bi pin 34W T12 Baselin e Balla st Fail ure LCC and PBP Results

CSL Lamp Ef f i cacy

lm

/W Desi gn O p ti on LC C $ LC C Sa v i ngs

$ In s t a l le d Pri c e

$ Op e r a t in g Cost Sa v i ngs

$ Pa y b ack Per i od

yr M ean Lumen From Basel i n e

% Bas e l i n e 77 . 9 3 4 W T1 2 & 0.8 8 BF El ec 1 52. 6 6 N/A 62 . 2 5 N/A N/A 0.0

CS L1 82 . 4 3 4 W T1 2 & 0.8 6 BF El ec 1 54. 6 9 -2 . 0 2 65 . 9 3 0.3 7 10 . 0 4.5 CS L2 85 . 3 3 4 W T1 2 & 0.8 6 BF El ec 1 61. 7 1 -9 . 0 5 72 . 9 6 0.3 7 29 . 0 10 . 9 CS L2 86 . 2 3 2 .5 W T8 & 0. 8 8 BF El ec 1 44. 6 5 8.0 1 56 . 5 2 1.1 2 0.0 9.6 CS L3 90 . 8 3 2 .5 W T8 & 0. 7 8 BF El ec 1 36. 7 4 15 . 9 2 59 . 6 2 3.5 6 0.0 4.4 CS L3 91 . 2 3 4 W T1 2 & 0.8 6 BF El ec 1 62. 0 0 -9 . 3 4 76 . 1 5 0.3 7 37 . 7 18 . 5 CS L4 92 . 3 3 2 .5 W T8 & 0. 7 5 BF El ec 1 32. 0 9 20 . 5 8 60 . 0 5 4.2 9 0.0 5.6 CS L4 95 . 0 3 0 W T8 & 0.7 8 BF El e c 1 33. 3 4 19 . 3 3 60 . 9 0 5.2 2 .0.0 3.3 CS L5 95 . 4 3 2 .5 W T8 & 0. 7 5 BF El ec 1 33. 4 7 19 . 1 9 61 . 6 1 4.2 9 0.0 8.0 CS L5 97 . 3 2 8 W T8 & 0.7 8 BF El e c 1 21. 3 8 31 . 2 8 60 . 3 0 7.7 2 0.0 -1 . 3 CS L5 96 . 0 2 5 W T8 & 0.8 8 BF El e c 1 25. 1 3 27 . 5 3 64 . 6 6 6.7 4 0.4 -0 . 9
26

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## LCC and PBP Results fo r th e 75W PAR38 Lamp Ope r a t ing in the Commerci a l Secto r

CS L Lamp Eff i ca cy

lm

/W De sign Opti on LCC $ LCC Sav i ngs

$ Inst alled Pric e

$ Operat ing Cos t Sav i ngs

$ Pay b ac k Pe riod

yr Init ial Lumens

From Ba s e line % Bas e l i n e 14 . 0 75 W , 14 l m / W & 2,5 0 0 hr s, H a l o g e n 25 . 5 3 N/A 6.1 6 N/A N/A 0.0 CS L1 15 . 9 66 W , 15 .9 lm / W & 3,0 0 0 hr s, Improv e d H a l o g e n 22 . 8 1 2.7 1 7.5 5 2.2 1 0.6 0.0 CS L2 17 . 5 60 W , 17 .5 lm / W & 3,0 0 0 hr s, H I R 21 . 6 0 3.9 2 7.7 3 3.6 8 0.4 0.0 CS L3 19 . 1 55 W , 19 .1 lm / W & 4,0 0 0 hr s, Improv e d H I R 19 . 6 4 5.8 9 9.0 5 4.9 1 0.6 0.0



###  A d ditiona l GS FL a n d IRL re s u lts c a n bef ound in Cha p t e r 8 of the Te c hnic a l Sup port Doc u me nt. 27

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Life -Cy c le Cost Se nsitivities  Se ns iti v ityRes u lts Sho w n i n A ppe ndix8B of theTe c h nic a l Sup port Document.



# • Monte Ca rlo Runs: variability in op erati ng hours , sales tax, electricity prices, discount ra tes. 

# • High and LowLa mp Prices 

# • IRL: High and Lo w Ope r a t ing Hours in Residentia l Sector 

# • G S FL: Assume No Bal l ast Price 

###  Other Possibl e Sensiti v ities 

# • High and Low Gr owth Electricit y P r ice Trends 

# • Variable Start Y e ar 

# • Analy s is Period as Multip le of Baseline Service Lif e 

# • Vary Secto r fo r e a ch Lamp T y pe

28

## Gener al Service Flu o resc ent Lam p and Incandescent Refle c to r Lam p Mar c h1 0 -11, 2 008 Energ y C o n s erv ati o n Stan dar dANOPR Pub lic M e etin g

Li fe-C y c le Cos t and Pa y b ack Pe riod A n al y ses 

## Other Issue s DOE se eks c o mment on any oth e r a s p ects re la te d to the Li fe Cycle Cos t a nd Payback Period Analy ses.

29



## ANOPR Iss ues for Pub lic Comment
 Op eratin g Hou r s (Issu e #6)  Gen e ral Ser v i ce F l u o r escen t L a mp En ergyCo n s u m p t io n (Issu e #7)  L i fe-Cycle Co st Calcu l atio n (Issu e #8)  In stallatio n Co sts (Issu e #9 )

30