alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Shale Water Conference

GreenHunter Energy, Inc. is a publicly traded

Company. (NYSE MKT symbol: GRH and GRH.PRC)

Investor Contact

Jonathan D. Hoopes

President and Chief Operating Officer

GreenHunter Energy, Inc.

1048 Texan Trail

Grapevine, TX 76051

Phone: (972) 410-1044

Fax: (972) 410-1066

GreenHunter Water, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary 

of GreenHunter Energy, Inc. 

www.greenhunterenergy.com

www.greenhunterwater.com
Water is a Valuable Resource

Water covers approximately 72% of globe 

Fresh Water is only 2.5% of this amount

2
Water Used for Fracking

Item of debate 

How much is it really? 

•6-12 million gallons per frac

•Sounds like a lot

•Less water than it takes to irrigate one section 

of corn for a season in Texas

3
4

Texas 

Source: Water Supply Options and Perspectives on Frac Water 

Usage in the Eagle Ford Shale- Darrell T. Brownlow, Ph.D.
Texas Aquifers

5

Source: Texas Water Development Board Report 380
6

Water Table Drop

Source: Texas Water Development Board Report 380
Texas Disposal Regulations

Increasing scrutiny on commercial disposal wells.

50,000 injection wells of which 11,000 are disposal wells

Still a very favorable state for disposal operations. 

Many operators convert existing wells to private disposal 

wells

7
Barnett

•Trinity Aquifer water table dropped more than 800’ in past 50 

years

•Water is still readily available

•Fresh water wells from Trinity Aquifer

•City of Fort Worth sells water for fracking

•Currently very little drilling

•Reuse is done by a few operators

•Increasing activity due to liquids, reuse may be viable 

depending on ‘recipe’ of frac. May use fresh water (little to no 

treatment options viable for economic reasons) heavy brine, 

reuse is possible. 

8
9

Barnett

Source: Fort Worth Basin Barnett Shale Water Assessment 2009
10

Barnett

Source: Fort Worth Basin Barnett Shale Water Assessment 2009
Eagle Ford

Water from Carizo Wilcox

Study by TX RRC and TWDB “plenty of water to support 

frac operations.”

Reuse / Treatment

•Cost for frac water can be high due to additives such 

as KCl – promotes reuse for economic benefit

11
Permian

Vast area covering 2 states, 75,000 sq miles

Localized drought issues in a few counties

Edwards-Trinity Aquifer

Pecos Valley Aquifer

Reuse

Localized difficulties in getting water for large drilling 

programs promote reuse, not on a large scale basis.

12
Infrastructure

No significant large area water pipelines yet....

Localized water pipelines in large drilling areas

Fresh water delivery

Flowback to central pit or MAG Tank setup

Produced water hauled to disposal

13
Investor Contact

Jonathan D. Hoopes

President and Chief Operating Officer

GreenHunter Energy, Inc.

1048 Texan Trail

Grapevine, TX 76051

Phone: (972) 410-1044

Fax: (972) 410-1066

www.greenhunterenergy.com

www.greenhunterwater.com

GreenHunter Water, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary 

of GreenHunter Energy, Inc. 

GreenHunter Energy, Inc. is a publicly traded

Company. (NYSE MKT symbol: GRH and GRH.PRC)

Shale Water Conference
#### §§ 1.30C-1-1.30C-2 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 26, 2010.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia**                     (Michael E. Collins, Senior Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:                

*1. Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation*, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania; to retain ownership of The Bryn Mawr Trust Company of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, and thereby engage in operating a nondepository trust company, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(5) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 8, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-5231 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
S3tZln.0i)0z

CfrU*-V feE Ci-vr^t^A S^fiXttJ^

•April 3LS)Q6iS'

C\<L*\C (&*\ frco^W

<j£A UJ-.-AH ^VjTC<Vn\^V ^ GQURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

Jp.o. R^^i^jgJS : ___ -APR 27 2015

~Re^ *5V(v\os oP ~^b^V Cooy^nc^->u>f\ U^rA VW*>6,<> Cofpux

*\Mogffjg-A 0^ msasqk-fl

"w^iVr CNc?\c

lKe_ rcc^ocsVecL ^V^yAo^ vj^A^\c&1 CS f\**&e£l

£a-^ o«v/ inn^vtlw vyasis

\t>or GLSS>sW\^-e r^> esLf\preCiq;U>

^C .£lt

S/ndf/A /^A^

.CkrWc.C.^ V^R<CMtvc»S^ ^OKqftfoA*

"T^lKftAA. Ulft^pO Tv^

A^u^^-

\Hoo ftwVSHS^

Tr&efo^'Tx- 1^Q3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                1,304,971
<SECURITIES>                            697,676
<RECEIVABLES>                           299,804
<ALLOWANCES>                             27,870
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      2,496,572
<PP&E>                                  222,558
<DEPRECIATION>                          149,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        3,219,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   282,181
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                              30,000
<COMMON>                                 10,421
<OTHER-SE>                            2,896,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          3,219,448
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,593,346
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         1,080,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         512,827
<INCOME-TAX>                             13,968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     498,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            498,859
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.04


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PRODUCER ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LTD'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        (27,398)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,770,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,383,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         178,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,548,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    652,250
<COMMON>                                       831,457
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,548,305
<SALES>                                      1,033,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,033,223
<CGS>                                          730,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,205,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (115,015)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (986,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,304)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (991,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,097,750)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY HAS ELECTED TO PRESENT AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 155 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 155

   Commending the Government of Italy for its commitment to halting 
                            software piracy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 25 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

  Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Kerry, Mr. 
 Jeffords, and Mr. Wofford) submitted the following resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

               April 19 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commending the Government of Italy for its commitment to halting 
                            software piracy.

Whereas the software industry estimates that United States and European software 
        firms lost more than $4,600,000,000 in sales in Europe in 1992 due to 
        illegal piracy of their products;
Whereas the illegal piracy of software threatens the continued development of 
        the software industry throughout the world and the availability of new 
        and better products for computer users;
Whereas the illegal piracy of software causes significant tax revenue losses 
        from lost sales and gives criminal organizations a new area of activity 
        through the supply of counterfeit product;
Whereas the Government of Italy enacted new legislation in December 1992, to 
        strengthen the protection of software under Italy's copyright law;
Whereas the Guardia di Finanza, the Carabinieri, and the Italian national police 
        have recently undertaken a number of significant and highly successful 
        antipiracy actions against illegal software use throughout Italy;
Whereas much of the software uncovered during these actions has been pirated 
        copies of products of leading American software companies; and
Whereas the recent antipiracy actions by Italian authorities have resulted in a 
        significant reduction in software piracy in Italy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the Government of Italy on its commitment to 
        halting software piracy;
            (2) congratulates the Guardia di Finanza, the Carabinieri, 
        and the Italian national police for their continuing antipiracy 
        actions; and
            (3) expresses its hope that the Italian authorities will 
        continue to prosecute software laws vigorously and that 
        copyright agencies around the world will follow the example set 
        by the people and Government of Italy.

                                 <all>
```
§ 1.6107-2 Form and manner of furnishing copy of return and retaining copy or record. ( a ) *In general.* The Commissioner may prescribe the form and manner of satisfying the requirements imposed by section 6107(a) and (b) and § 1.6107-1(a) and (b) in forms, instructions, or other appropriate guidance (*see* § 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter).
( b ) *Effective date.* To the extent this section relates to section 6107(a) and § 1.6107-1(a), it applies to income tax returns and claims for refund presented to a taxpayer for signature after December 31, 2002. To the extent this section relates to section 6107(b) and § 1.6107-1(b), it applies after December 31, 2002, to returns and claims for refund for which the 3-year period described in section 6107(b) expires after December 31, 2002.
[T.D. 9119, 69 FR 15249, Mar. 25, 2004]
#### § 1.509(a)-6 Classification under section 509(a).

If an organization is described in section 509(a)(1) and also in another paragraph of section 509(a), it will be treated as described in section 509(a)(1). For purposes of this section, the parenthetical language *other than in clauses (vii) and (viii*) used in section 509(a)(1) shall be construed to mean *other than an organization which is described only in clause (vii) or (viii*). For example, X is an organization which is described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), but could also meet the description of section 170(b)(1)(A)(viii) as an organization described in section 509(a)(2). For purposes of the one-third support test in section 509(a)(2)(A), contributions from X to other organizations will be treated as support from an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) rather than from an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(viii).

[T.D. 7212, 37 FR 21923, Oct. 17, 1972]
I N TH E SUPREM E COUR T O F THE STAT E O F MONTANA Cas e No . DA 21 - 0605
BOARD OF REGENTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION OF THE STATE OF MONTANA,

Petitioner and Appellee,

vs. THE STATE OF MONTANA, BY AND THROUGH AUSTIN KNUDSEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellant. ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY MONTANA SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION TO FILE FRIEND OF THE COURT BRIEF
Pursuant to the Montana Shooting Sports Association’s motion for leave to file an amicus brief and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the Montana Shooting Sports Association is granted leave to appear as amicus curiae in this case for the limited purpose of submitting amicus briefs in support of Appellants. The amicus brief shall be filed within one week of Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 20 2022

01/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0605
Exhibit 35.11





|(wells fargo logo) | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
                                         D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334
|------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2015,
by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer,
LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC, as Operating Advisor, CITIBANK N.A., as Certificate Administrator
and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33
(the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage
Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from September 1, 2015 through December
31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under
my supervision, and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Certificate as of the 4thday of March 2016.



|/s/ Daniel Bober         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober             | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 





|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | 
|---------------------- |
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 15

- 00016

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 76th District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. 37,692

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### ORDER Court reporter Cresta LeFevre recorded the trial court proceedings in cause number 06

- 15

- 00016

- CV, styled In the Interest of S. S., a Child , trial court cause number 37,692 in the 76th Judicial District Court of Titus County, Texas. The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal of a parental

- rights termination order was due on March 23, 2015, by order of this Court.
LeFev re has filed a motion for extension of time in which to file this record, asking that she be permitted to file the record on or before March 30, 2015. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c). The Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed i n a reasonable amount of time. Therefo re, we hereby overrule LeFevre’s motion, and, due to the circumstances presented in LeFevre’s motion, order LaFevre to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06

- 15

- 00016

- CV, styled In the Interest of S .S., a Child , trial court cause number 37,692 in th e 76th Judicial District Court of Titus County, Texas, on or before March 30, 2015. If the reporter’s record is not received by March 30, we warn LeFevre that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in co ntempt of this Court for failing to obey its order.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: March 25, 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,882]

                    By application dated June 25, 2009, the petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on June 17, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 14, 2009 (74 FR 34038).                

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of automotive drive train components did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred.

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided additional information regarding customers of the subject firm and imports of automotive drive train components.

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of July 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-18180 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P