alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.367(b)-12 Subsequent treatment of amounts attributed or included in income. ( a ) *In general.* This section applies to distributions with respect to, or a disposition of, stock— ( 1 ) To which, in connection with an exchange occurring before February 23, 2000, an amount has been attributed pursuant to § 7.367(b)-9 or 7.367(b)-10 of this chapter (as in effect prior to February 23, 2000, see 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 1999); or
( 2 ) In respect of which, before February 23, 2000, an amount has been included in income or added to earnings and profits pursuant to § 7.367(b)-7 or § 7.367(b)-10 of this chapter (as in effect prior to February 23, 2000, see 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 1999).
( b ) *Applicable rules.* See § 7.367(b)-12(b) through (e) of this chapter (as in effect prior to January 11, 2001, see 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 2000) for purposes of applying paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section applies to distributions or dispositions that occur on or after January 11, 2001.
[T.D. 8937, 66 FR 2257, Jan. 11, 2001]
AIR-08-093-E CORRECTED COPY

In our letter dated December 26, 2007, the FAA erroneously assigned Exemption No. 49131 to the exemption, instead of Exemption No. 4913I. This document corrects the error and the exemption will still expire on January 31, 2012.

December 26, 2007 Exemption No. 4913I Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11375

Dr. Michael Romanowski Assistant Vice President, Civil Aviation Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. 1000 Wilson Blvd, Suite 1700 Arlington, VA 22209-3901

Dear Dr. Romanowski:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 4913, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Novem ber 2, 2007, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. (AIA), for an extension of Exemption No. 4913, as amended. That exemption provides certain aircraft manufactures with relief from §§ 21.182(a) and 45.11(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

It allows AIA-member aircraft manufacturers to manufacture aircraft intended for either export, use in air carrier operations conducted under 14 CFR part 121, or commuter operations conducted under 14 CFR part 135 (a s defined in 14 CFR part 119) without installing an identification plate during the produc tion phase of the exterior of those aircraft.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to AIA.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 4913, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701

, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 4913, as amended, to January 31, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 4913, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 4913.

Sincerely,

/s/ John J. Hickey Director, Aircraft Certification Service
Network Transformers

-- J 

FEDERA CIFIC 
SUBSTATION IUS 

C1RCUlT .REAK£RS 

NO.1 NO.2 HOl ,"RIMAR., F£ED£R3 

Fig. 3- Simplifled one-line diagram of a conventional a-c 

secondary network. 

I Elecllic Utilir)! Engineering Reference Book DISTRIBUTION SYSTElv[S, Electric Utility Engineers, 

Westinghouse Electric Corporation, East Pittsburgh, PA, 1965. P 150. 

FEDERA CIFIC 
HV Swi1ch 

Fig. 7-View showing 0 modern network unit mounted in 

on underground voult. 

3 Electric Utiliry Engineering Reference Book: DISTRIBUTION SYST£IfS, Electric Utility Engineers. 

We'1inghause Electric Carparana1l, East Pittsburgh. PA, 1965, p 154. 

FEDERA CIFIC
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 147 (Monday, August 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Senior Executive Service; Social Inspector General for the 
Troubled Asset Relief Program; Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Treasury Department.

ACTION: Notice of members of the SIGTARP Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice announces the 
appointment of members of the Special Inspector General for the 
Troubled Asset Relief Program Performance Review Board (PRB). The 
purpose of this Board is to review and make recommendations concerning 
proposed performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses and other appropriate 
personnel actions for incumbents of SES positions in SIGTARP. The Board 
will perform PRB functions for other bureau positions if requested.
    Compostion of SIGTARP PRB: The Board shall consist of at least 
three members. In the case of an appraisal of a career appointee, more 
than half the members shall consist of career appointees. The names and 
titles of the Board members are as follows:

Kevin Puvalowski, Deputy Special Inspector General.
Dr. Eileen Ennis, Deputy Special Inspector General, Operations.
Barry Holman, Deputy Special Inspector General, Audit.
Christopher Sharply, Deputy Special Inspector General, Investigations.
Brian Saddler, Chief Counsel to the Special Inspector General.

DATES: Effective Date: Membership is effective on the date of this 
notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally Ruble, Human Resources 
Specialist, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220, 
Telephone: 202 927-9457.

    Dated: July 24, 2009.
Deborah Mason,
Director, Human Resources, Operations Division.
[FR Doc. E9-18200 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
About GPO|Newsroom/Media|Congressional Relations|Inspector General|Careers|Contact|askGPO|Help

VISIT beta.gpo.gov
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:20 AM

To: 'brian@brianwalk.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Unmanned Aerial Solutions

Dear Brian M. Walk:  

  

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

0143).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•         Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1.  If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and not consider closed‐set

filming in your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention before the requested response date listed

below.  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 4/30/15.  If you have any

questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,  

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By:  	/s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		   Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	   President

Date:		   November 14, 2005
SANITIZED

DNW-5500

CAS / IES NUMBER
Calendar No. 304

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 167

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate concerning the

N

Arabs of southern Iraq.Iraqi Government’s campaign against the Marsh

OVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the

preamble
III

Calendar No. 304

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 167

Expressing the sense of the Senate concerning the Iraqi Government’s

campaign against the Marsh Arabs of southern Iraq.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. PELL and Mr. HELMS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Reported by Mr. PELL, with an amendment and an amendment to the

preamble

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate concerning the Iraqi

Government’s campaign against the Marsh Arabs of

southern Iraq.

Whereas the government of Saddam Hussein has a long and

well documented history of brutal repression of the population of Iraq;

Whereas Saddam Hussein carried out a methodical campaign

of genocide against Iraqi Kurds, including extensive efforts to render large areas of Iraqi Kurdistan uninhabit-
2

SRES 167 RS

able and the use of poison gas in violation of international law;

Whereas Saddam Hussein is now conducting a massive campaign of repression against the population of Shi’ite

Arabs in southern Iraq known as the marsh Arabs or the

Maadan;

Whereas this campaign includes an enormous effort to drain

the wetlands at the confluence of the Tigris and the Euphrates which have sustained the distinct march Arab

civilization for thousands of years;

Whereas in addition to draining the wetlands Iraqi troops

have extensively shelled villages in the marshes;

Whereas the campaign against the marsh Arabs appears to

constitute an effort to drive the entire civilian population

out of the marshes and to destroy the way of life for of

a distinct community within Iraq;

Whereas there are recent reports that Iraqi troops have employed chemical weapons against the marsh Arabs in violation of international law and United Nations Security

Council resolutions concerning Iraq; and

Whereas prior to the Gulf War the world community did not

stop Saddam Hussein from employing similar tactics

against the Kurds: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the United States Government should

2 immediately—

3 (a) raise the issue of Saddam Hussein’s cam4 paign of repression against the marsh Arabs in the

5 Security Council;
3

SRES 167 RS

1 (b) insist that United Nations weapons inspec2 tors be permitted to conduct on site inspections con3 cerning the possible use by Iraqi troops of chemical

4 weapons;

5 (c) seek to provide humanitarian assistance to

6 persons fleeing from the marshes; and

7 (d) study and report to the Congress concerning

8 the environmental consequences of the destruction of

9 this vast wetlands area.
#### Commonwealth v. Schwartz

*J. Stroud Weber,*district attorney, for Commonwealth.

*Wisler, P'earlstine, Talone & Gerber,*for defendant.

April 21, 1952.

Knight, P. J.,

Defendant was charged with a violation of section 414 of The Penal Code of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, in that he sent to Officer Hugh McCann of the Cheltenham Township police force a typewritten letter containing defamatory, scurrilous and opprobrious language without appending his proper signature.

The section of The Penal Code referred to reads as follows:

> “Whoever, without appending his proper signature thereto, sends or causes to be sent to another, any written or printed communication or matter, which is either libelous, defamatory, scurrilous or opprobrious, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding ($500.00) or undergo imprisonment for not more than one (1) year, or both”.

*560It appears plain to us that this act is aimed at those cowardly people who send anonymous communications through the mail or by other means.

The offense has two essential elements. The communication must contain either libelous, defamatory, scurrilous or opprobrious matter, and, the sender has failed to append his proper signature thereto.

We do not have the communication before us, but it was read at the argument and there can be little doubt that its language was defamatory and opprobrious.

The letter was typewritten and appended thereto was the signature of defendant, also in typewriting. The letter also contained his address.

A signature does not have to be in the handwriting of a person to constitute a proper signature. Many letters today go out over typewritten signatures and persons who by reason of lack of education or infirmities sign by a mark.

The very purpose of the act was to punish those who sent libelous letters without disclosing their identity. This letter disclosed the identity of the sender and it is immaterial that the signature is not in his handwriting. In fact, a typewritten signature better identifies the sender of a letter than many handwritten signatures we have seen.

■ In our opinion the words “proper signature” in the act means that it can not be an assumed or fictitious .name but the proper or true name of the sender.

The industry of counsel and our own research has failed to disclose any reported case in which the facts resembled those here present.

Other reasons are advanced in support of the motion to quash but we do not think it necessary to discuss them.

And now, April 21, 1952, the motion to quash the transcript is allowed and the transcript quashed.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2015, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS,LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCBMaster Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A., as NCB Special Servicer,MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as OneCourt Square Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor,WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as TaxAdministrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-NXS3(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled allof its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 814 

To protect benefits provided under Social Security, Medicare, and any other 

program of benefits administered by the Social Security Administration 

or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Mr. DOGGETT, and Mr. FROST) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

A BILL 

To protect benefits provided under Social Security, Medicare, 

and any other program of benefits administered by the 

Social Security Administration or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Social Security 

5 and Medicare Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 814 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUPERMAJORITY VOTE REQUIRED TO CUT BENE2 FITS ADMINISTERED BY SOCIAL SECURITY 

3 ADMINISTRATION OR CENTERS FOR MEDI4 CARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES. 

5 (a) SUPERMAJORITY VOTE REQUIREMENT.—A bill or 

6 joint resolution, or any amendment offered to a bill or 

7 joint resolution, which contains any provision which, if en8 acted, would result in the reduction of any existing benefit 

9 provided or administered by the Social Security Adminis10 tration or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 

11 may not be considered in the House of Representatives 

12 or the Senate unless two-thirds of the Members present 

13 and voting agree to a motion to consider the bill, joint 

14 resolution, or amendment with the provision included. 

15 (b) EXCEPTION FOR PAYMENTS TO MEDICARE AD16 VANTAGE PLANS.—Subsection (a) does not apply to any 

17 provision which, if enacted, would result in the reduction 

18 of any payment made to a Medicare Advantage plan under 

19 part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

20 1395w–21 et seq.), but only if the provision would, if en21 acted, result in an increase in the amount of payments 

22 made for other purposes under title XVIII of the Social 

23 Security Act in an amount equal to or greater than the 

24 amount of the reduction in payment made to the Medicare 

25 Advantage plan. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 814 IH

1 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF REDUCTION OF BENEFITS. 

2 During the consideration of a bill, joint resolution, 

3 or amendment in the House of Representatives or Senate, 

4 any determination regarding whether a provision in the 

5 bill, joint resolution, or amendment would, if enacted, re6 sult in a reduction described in section 2(a) or a reduction 

7 or increase described in section 2(b) shall be made solely 

8 on the basis of a determination made by the Office of the 

9 Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**OFFICER’SCERTIFICATE**

 

Pursuantto the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactionslisted on Schedule I hereto, for which Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asMaster Servicer, has engaged Berkeley Point Capital LLC dba Newmark, as PrimarySub-Servicer or Limited Primary Sub- Servicer, (as reflected on Schedule Ihereto) (each a “Sub-Servicing Agreement”), the undersigned, Ronald Steffenino,Vice Chairman, Berkeley Point Capital LLC dba Newmark, hereby certifies subjectto any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solelyin his capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows: 

 

1.Areview of the activities of the Primary & Limited Primary Sub-Servicerduring the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of itsperformance under the applicable Servicing Agreement has been made under mysupervision; and 

 

2.Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Primary & LimitedPrimary Sub-Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicableServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

BerkeleyPoint Capital LLC 

dbaNewmark 

 

Dated:February 22, 2022

 

/s/Ronald Steffenino

RonaldSteffenino 

ViceChairman 

 

 

**ScheduleI**

 

**CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC dba Newmark asPrimary Sub-Servicer for Well Fargo NA**

 

| CFCRE  2016-C3    | CFCRE  2016-C4     |
|-------------------|--------------------|
| CFCRE  2018-C2    | UBS  2017-C4       |
| UBS  2017-C6      | COMM  2014-CCRE20  |
| GS  2015-GC28     | COMM  2015-CCRE24  |
| COMM  2015-CCRE26 | GS  2015-GC34      |
| COMM  2015-LC23   | Citigroup  2016-C1 |
| SG  2016-C5       | CFCRE  2016-C6     |
| CFCRE  2017-C8    | UBS  2018-C10      |
| CFCRE  2018-C6    | BBCMS  2018-C2     |

 

**CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates; Berkeley Point Capital LLC dba Newmark asLimited Primary Sub-Servicer for Wells Fargo NA**

 

| COMM  2012-CCRE2   | COMM  2012-CCRE3       |
|--------------------|------------------------|
| COMM  2012-CCRE4   | COMM  2013-CCRE6       |
| COMM  2013-CCRE10  | COMM  2013-CCRE12      |
| COMM  2013-CCRE13  | COMM  2014-CCRE14      |
| DB  CCRE 2014-ARCP | GSMS  2014-GC18        |
| CGMCT  2014-GC19   | CGMCT  2014-GC21       |
| GS  2015-GC28      | COMM  2015-CCRE22      |
| COMM  2014-LC17    | COMM  2014-CCRE20      |
| GSMS  2014-GC22    | COMM  2014-UBS5        |
| GSMS  2014-GC26    | COMM  2015-CCRE24      |
| COMM  2015-CCRE25  | COMM  2015-CCRE26      |
| COMM  2016-CCRE28  | COMM  2016-CCRE28      |
| GS  2015-GC34      | BBCCRE  TRUST 2015-GTP |
| COMM  2015-LC23    | Citigroup  2016-C1     |
| CFCRE  2016-C3     | CFCRE  2016-C4         |
| SG  2016-C5        | CFCRE  2016-C6         |
| UBS  2017-C6       | UBS  2017-C7           |
| CFCRE  2017 C8     | UBS  2018-C10          |
| BBCMS  2018-C2     | CFCRE  2019 L3         |
| UBS  2019 C18      |                   |

 

 

(logo)**NEWMARK**

 

8Spring House Innovation Park 

Suite200

LowerGwynedd, PA 19002

nmrk.com
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.3935 Prosthetic heart valve holder. ( a ) *Identification.* A prosthetic heart valve holder is a device used to hold a replacement heart valve while it is being sutured into place.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter.
[45 FR 7907, Feb. 5, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 1121, Jan. 16, 1996]