alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 154

To welcome the holding of democratic elections in Pakistan, to congratulate

Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the occasion of her swearing-in, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. PELL (for himself, Mr. HELMS, Mr. MOYNIHAN, and Mr. BROWN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Foreign Relations

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Committee discharged

RESOLUTION

To welcome the holding of democratic elections in Pakistan,

to congratulate Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto on the

occasion of her swearing-in, and for other purposes.

Whereas the United States and Pakistan have maintained

close and cooperative relations over many years;

Whereas the United States has a strong interest in strengthening democracy and human rights in Pakistan;

Whereas Pakistan held elections for the National and Provincial Assemblies on October 6 and 9, 1993, respectively;

Whereas the elections were observed by independent domestic

monitors and by an international delegation organized by
2

SRES 154 CDS

the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI);

Whereas the NDI delegation reported that ‘‘the balloting was

generally open, orderly and well-administered,’’ that

‘‘election officials generally carried out their tasks impartially and with diligence,’’ and that the announcement of

results ‘‘generally proceeded in accordance with the law;’’

Whereas the people of the United States enjoy an abiding

friendship with the people of Pakistan; and

Whereas the United States and Pakistan share a common interest in the promotion of stability in Pakistan and the

easing of tensions in the South Asia region: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) welcomes the holding of elections on Octo3 ber 6 and 9, 1993, in Pakistan as an important step

4 toward reaffirming Pakistan’s democratic course;

5 (2) congratulates Prime Minister Benazir

6 Bhutto on the occasion of her swearing-in on Octo7 ber 19, 1993;

8 (3) reaffirms the existing ties of friendship be9 tween the peoples of Pakistan and the United

10 States; and

11 (4) underscores the continuing interest of the

12 United States in working with the government of

13 Pakistan on issues of bilateral and regional concern.

Æ
# C_2016068EN.01001901.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Germany) — Firma Theodor Pfister v Landkreis Main-Spessart

(Case C-58/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - Health inspections - Official feed and food controls - Financing of controls - Inspection costs relating to slaughter - Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 - Directive 85/73/EEC - Possibility of levying fees covering the actual cost of inspection, exceeding the fees set by that directive))

(2016/C 068/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Firma Theodor Pfister

Applicant:

Defendant: Landkreis Main-Spessart

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 27(3) of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1791/2006 of 20 November 2006, must be interpreted as authorising, for the transitional period of 2007, the levying of fees for the costs occasioned by inspections and controls relating to meat hygiene so as to cover the costs incurred by the competent authority, in accordance with Council Directive 85/73/EEC of 29 January 1985 on the financing of veterinary inspections and controls covered by Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC, 90/675/EEC and 91/496/EEC, as amended by Council Directive 97/79/EC of 18 December 1997.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 26.5.2015.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1417

FRANCES SYPTAK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ARABIAN AMERICAN OIL COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-95-107-5-T)

Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: January 20, 1999

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phyllis A. Palmieri, PALMIERI & ASSOCIATES, Morganton, North Carolina, for Appellant. V. Scott Kneese, Elizabeth Mata Kroger,

BRACEWELL & PATTERSON, L.L.P., Houston, Texas, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Frances Syptak, proceeding on behalf of her deceased husband,

Harold G. Syptak, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

complaint under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. See 29

U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1994). This case was referred to a magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). After an

exhaustive analysis, the magistrate judge ultimately recommended

that relief be denied and advised the parties that failure to file

timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

Despite receiving an extension of time in which to do so, Syptak

did not file his objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation until thirteen days after the expiration of the extended

period. The district court struck the untimely objections from the

record.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate

review by failing to file timely objections after receiving proper

notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We grant the motion to submit the case on the briefs because the
3

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### McEntire, receiver, *v.*John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company *et al.*

No. 8528.

January 14, 1932.

*George L. Goode,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. D. Bradwell, R. T. Camp, T. G. Dorough, Little, Powell, Reid & Goldstein,*and *J. H. & Emmett Skelton,*contra.

*Hill, J.*

This case was before the Supreme Court on a former occasion (172 *Ga.*421, 157 S. E. 494), when this court held: “The grantee in a deed conveying land as security for payment of money loaned being no party to and having no notice of subsequent proceedings to establish, under the act of 1911 (Ga. L. 1911, p. 108), a drainage district including part of the land so conveyed, was not bound by those proceedings, to which the grantor (borrower) was a party.” When the remittitur was filed in the trial court the judge rendered- a judgment in conformity with the ruling of the Supreme Court. To this judgment the plaintiff in error filed exceptions, and brought the case again to the Supreme Court. “A decision by the Supreme Court is controlling upon the judge of the trial court, as well as upon the Supreme Court when the case reaches that court a second time. The principle in the decision may 'be reviewed and overruled in another ease between different parties, but as between the parties the decision stands as the law of the case.” *Western & Atlantic R. Co.*v. *Third National Bank,*125 *Ga.*489 (54 S. E. 621), and cit. See *City of Atlanta*v. *Smith,*165 *Ga.*146 (140 S. E. 369). Applying the rule stated above to the facts of this case, the court did not err in the judgment rendered.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131399 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131399 COA: 259187 Oakland CC: 2004-196310-FC LARRY DARNELL CARR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 22, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0054. JIMMIE LOU DIXON v. BEVERLY J. WRIGHT et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SUCV19CV000043
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-1996
[CASH]                                           17135
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  8173878
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               8325533
[PP&E]                                         4308174
[DEPRECIATION]                                 1330096
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                13292209
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          3791250
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                          5082
[OTHER-SE]                                    11168228
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                  13292209
[SALES]                                        6309113
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               6309113
[CGS]                                          3568754
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  4913844
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                  6225
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                6225
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                1389044
[INCOME-TAX]                                    472275
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             916769
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    916769
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                      .19
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .19
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |     |                            
|----------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|Date:             |     |                            
|February 17, 2009 | By: | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                  |     |                            
|                  |     | Marc N. Teal               
|                  |     | Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6600 Ultraviolet (UV) radiation chamber disinfection device. ( a ) *Identification.* An ultraviolet (UV) radiation chamber disinfection device is intended for the low-level surface disinfection of non-porous equipment surfaces by dose-controlled UV irradiation. This classification does not include self-contained open chamber UV radiation disinfection devices intended for whole room disinfection in a health care environment.
( b ) *Classification* —Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Performance testing must demonstrate the following: ( i ) The chamber's ability to control the UV radiation dose during operation.
( ii ) The chamber's disinfection performance through microbial challenge testing.
( iii ) Evidence that the equipment intended to be processed is UV compatible.
( iv ) Validation of the cleaning and disinfection procedures.
( v ) The ability of the device to continue to perform to all specification after cleaning and disinfection.
( vi ) Whether the device generates ozone (if so, 21 CFR 801.415, Maximum acceptable level of ozone, applies).
( 2 ) Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
( 3 ) Appropriate analysis and/or testing must validate electrical safety, mechanical safety, and electromagnetic compatibility of the device in its intended use environment.
( 4 ) The labeling must include: ( i ) UV hazard warning labels.
( ii ) Explanation of all displays and/or labeling on user interface.
( iii ) Explanation of device safety interlocks.
( iv ) Explanation of all disinfection cycle signals, cautions and warnings.
( v ) Device operating procedures.
( vi ) Identification of the expected UV lamp operational life and instructions for procedures on replacement of the UV lamp when needed.
( vii ) Procedures to follow in case of UV lamp malfunction or failure.
( viii ) Procedures for disposing of mercury-containing UV lamps, if applicable.
( ix ) Identification of specific equipment that is compatible with the UV radiation dose generated by the device and that can safely undergo UV radiation low-level disinfection in the chamber device.
( x ) Description of the required preparation of equipment for disinfection in the UV radiation chamber device.
( xi ) Identification of the specific microbes used in successful performance testing of the device.
( xii ) Validated instructions for cleaning and disinfection of the device.
[80 FR 72588, Nov. 20, 2015]
Att. 00 3 **Contains Confidential Business Information** Confidential Information Redacted
#### § 1.544-3 Constructive ownership by reason of family and partnership ownership.

(a) The following example illustrates the application of section 544(a)(2), relating to constructive ownership by reason of family and partnership ownership.

# Example.

The M Corporation at some time during the last half of the taxable year, had 1,800 shares of outstanding stock, 450 of which were held by various individuals having no relationship to one another and none of whom were partners, and the remaining 1,350 were held by 51 shareholders as follows:

| Relationships | Shares | Shares | Shares | Shares | Shares |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| An individual | (A)100 | (B)20 | (C)20 | (D)20 | (E)20 |
| His father | (AF)10 | (BF)10 | (CF)10 | (DF)10 | (EF)10 |
| His wife | (AW)10 | (BW)40 | (CW)40 | (DW)40 | (EW)40 |
| His brother | (AB)10 | (BB)10 | (CB)10 | (DB)10 | (EB)10 |
| His son | (AS)10 | (BS)40 | (CS)40 | (DS)40 | (ES)40 |
| His daughter by former marriage (son's | | | | | |
| half-sister) | (ASHS)10 | (BSHS)40 | (CSHS)40 | (DSHS)40 | (ESHS)40 |
| His brother's wife | (ABW)10 | (BBW)10 | (CBW)10 | (DBW)160 | (EBW)10 |
| His wife's father | (AWF)10 | (BWF)10 | (CWF)110 | (DWF)10 | (EWF)10 |
| His wife's brother | (AWB)10 | (BWB)10 | (CWB)10 | (DWB)10 | (EWB)10 |
| His wife's brother's wife | (AWBW)10 | (BWBW)10 | (CWBW)10 | (DWBW)10 | (EWBW)110 |
| Individual's partner | (AP)10 | | | | |

By applying the statutory rule provided in section 544(a)(2) five individuals own more than 50 percent of the outstanding stock as follows:

| A (including AF, AW, AB, AS, ASHS, AP) | 160 |
| --- | --- |
| B (including BF, BW, BB, BS, BSHS) | 160 |
| CW (including C, CS, CWF, CWB) | 220 |
| DB (including D, DF, DBW) | 200 |
| EWB (including EW, EWF, EWBW) | 170 |
| Total, or more than 50 percent | 910 |

Individual A represents the obvious case where the head of the family owns the bulk of the family stock and naturally is the head of the group. A's partner owns 10 shares of the stock. Individual B represents the case where he is still head of the group because of the ownership of stock by his immediate family. Individuals C and D represent cases where the individuals fall in groups headed in C's case by his wife and in D's case by his brother because of the preponderance of holdings on the part of relatives by marriage. Individual E represents the case where the preponderant holdings of others eliminate that individual from the group.

(b) For the restriction on the applicability of the family and partnership ownership rules of this section, see paragraph (b) of § 1.544-1. For rules relating to constructive ownership as actual ownership, see § 1.544-6.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-229548) pertaining to the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the 2017 Stock Option and Grant Plan of Alector, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2019, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Alector, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2018.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California

March 26, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854883
<NAME>                        Edd Helms Group, Inc.

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                            77,255
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,912,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                      67,507
<INVENTORY>                                      439,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,823,630
<PP&E>                                         2,779,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,871,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,938,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,467,653
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         126,740
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,091,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,938,000
<SALES>                                       10,065,847
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              10,065,847
<CGS>                                          7,902,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,902,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,621,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                36,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  678,327
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              678,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     678,327
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .05


</TABLE>
#### § 1.242-1 Deduction for partially tax-exempt interest.

A corporation is allowed a deduction under section 242(a) in an amount equal to certain interest received on obligations of the United States, or an obligation of corporations organized under Acts of Congress which are instrumentalities of the United States. The interest for which a deduction shall be allowed is interest which is included in gross income and which is exempt from normal tax under the act, as amended and supplemented, which authorized the issuance of the obligations. The deduction allowed by section 242(a) is allowed only for the purpose of computing normal tax, and therefore, no deduction is allowed for such interest in the computation of any surtax imposed by Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

[T.D. 7100, 36 FR 5333, Mar. 20, 1971]
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANCORPORATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Community National Bancorporation, hereby certifies that:

1. Community National Bancorporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Community National Bancorporation.

/S/ Theron G. ReedTheron G. Reed
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003