alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 269 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 269

To amend Senate Resolution 75, 103d Congress, relating to the Jacob K. 
                   Javits Senate Fellowship Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To amend Senate Resolution 75, 103d Congress, relating to the Jacob K. 
                   Javits Senate Fellowship Program.

    Resolved, That Senate Resolution 75 (103d Congress, 1st Session), 
agreed to March 3, 1993, is amended--
            (1) in section 2, by adding at the end thereof the 
        following:
    ``(c) The Jacob K. Javits Foundation, Incorporated shall--
            ``(1) broadly publicize the availability of the fellowship 
        program;
            ``(2) develop and administer an application process for 
        Senate fellowships;
            ``(3) conduct a screening of applicants for the fellowship 
        program; and
            ``(4) select participants without regard to race, color, 
        religion, sex, National origin, age, or disability.'';
            (2) in section 3, by amending subsection (c) to read as 
        follows:
    ``(c) The Secretary, after consultation with the Majority Leader 
and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall assist with the placement 
of eligible participants in positions in the Senate that are, within 
practical considerations, supportive of the fellowship participants' 
academic programs. Fellows shall be considered as employees of the 
office or committee in which they are placed.''; and
            (3) in section 5, by inserting ``the Minority Leader of'' 
        before ``the Senate''.
                                 <all>
```
39369.

#### HARRIS v. THE STATE.

Frankum, Judge.

B. F. Harris was convicted of abandoning his three minor children, and his appeal is before this court on the general grounds of his motion for a new trial only. “There are two elements in the offense of abandonment of child: (a) desertion, that is, the willful forsaking and desertion of the duties of parenthood; (b) dependency, that is, .leaving such child in a dependent condition. Both elements *449must be present to complete the offense.” *Blackwell v. State,*48 Ga. App. 221 (1) (172 SE 670). -Construing the evidence, as we must, most strongly in favor of the verdict of the jury which was approved by the trial court, the evidence supports the verdict.

Decided February 23, 1962

Rehearing denied March 6, 1962.

*Casey Thigpen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thomas A. Hutcheson, Solicitor, Dukes & McMillan,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                HOTELECOPY, INC.

         1.       The name of the Corporation is Hotelecopy, Inc.
         2. Article III,  "AUTHORIZED  SHARES," of the Articles of Incorporation
of the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
                                  "ARTICLE III
                                AUTHORIZED SHARES

                  The total  authorized  capital  stock of this  Corporation  is
                  20,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share."

         3. The  foregoing  amendment  was approved by the Board of Directors of
the  Corporation  by a Unanimous  Written  Consent signed by them on March 26th,
1999, and was approved and adopted by a majority of the shareholders eligible to
vote at a meeting held for such purpose on July 30, 1999.
         4. There is only one voting  group  entitled  to vote on the  foregoing
amendment.  The number of votes cast for said amendment by said voting group was
sufficient for approval by that voting group.
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned,  as President of the Corporation,
has executed these Articles of Amendment this 2nd day of August, 1999.

                                                     /s/ W. Edd Helms, Jr.
                                                     W. EDD HELMS, JR.
                                    President
This instrument was prepared by:
St. John Daugherty, Esq.
Lic. #937274
Tel. 954-525-9900
Berger Davis & Singerman, PA
100 N.E. Third Avenue, Suite 400
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301


<PAGE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00325

- CV

DUX PETROLEUM, LLC APPELLANT

V.

ERW TRADING &

TRANSPORTATION, LLC APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 153RD DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 153

- 270478

- 14

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “ A greed Mot i on To Reverse And Set

Aside Trial Court Judgment W i thout Regard To The Merits And Remand For

Disposit i on I n Accord W ith Agr eement Of The Parties, And Fo r I mmediate

Issuance Of Mandate .” It is the court ’ s opinion that the motion should be

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 granted; therefore, w e set aside the trial court ’s judgment without regard to the

merits and remand this case to the trial court to render judgment in accordance

with th e parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office

Sys., Inc. v. Johnson , 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995). Costs of the appeal

shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1( d)

.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J.

DELIVERED: January 2 9 , 2015
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

137855 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137855 

 COA: 278585 

Wayne CC: 07-003670-01 

MICHAEL LEE GOBEL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,107]

Pursuant to Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 19, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed by the State of Maine Workforce Office on behalf of workers of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 567, Lewiston, Maine.

The petitioner requested that this petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-18043 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6918]

Pursuant to section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F, Pub. L. 111-117) (“the Act”), and Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of Cambodia, and I hereby waive such restriction.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published in the                     **Federal Register.**

Dated: March 1, 2010.

Jacob J. Lew,

Deputy Secretary for Management  and Resources.

[FR Doc. 2010-5261 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3900 Varicella-zoster virus serological reagents. ( a ) *Identification.* Varicella-zoster virus serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to varicella-zoster in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by varicella-zoster viruses and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Varicella (chicken pox) is a mild, highly infectious disease, chiefly of children. Zoster (shingles) is the recurrent form of the disease, occurring in adults who were previously infected with varicella-zoster viruses. Zoster is the response (characterized by a rash) of the partially immune host to a reactivation of varicella viruses present in latent form in the patient's body.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
III

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 177

Informing the President of the United States that a quorum of each House

is assembled.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Informing the President of the United States that a quorum

of each House is assembled.

1 Resolved, That a committee consisting of two Sen2 ators be appointed to join such committee as may be ap3 pointed by the House of Representatives to wait upon the

4 President of the United States and inform him that a

5 quorum of each House is assembled and that the Congress

6 is ready to receive any communication he may be pleased

7 to make.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 132823(48) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

KEVIN SMITH, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 132823 

v COA: 262139 

Oakland CC: 2003-047984-NH 

LOUIE KHOURI, D.D.S., LOUIE KHOURI,

D.D.S., P.C., and ADVANCED DENTAL CARE

CLINIC, L.L.C.,

Defendants-Appellants. 

On order of the Chief Justice the motion by defendants-appellant for 

extension to October 12, 2007 of the time for filing their brief is considered and it is 

GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2007 

Clerk
GAYLA R. MAY CSR, RPR

27th Judicial District Court

P. O. Box 747

Belton, TX 76513

(254) 933-5270

 September 25, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Third District of Texas 

Court of Appeals

P. O. Box 12547

Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

Re: Trial Court No. 72,941; Karl Lee Wiggins Vs. The State of Texas;

 27th District Court, Bell County, TX; Case No. 03-15-00385-CR

 

Dear Mr. Kyle:

In reference to the appeal of Karl Lee Wiggins Vs. State, COA 03-15-00385-CR, I am 

requesting a one-week extension in order for me to gather the exhibits. I am home with a

husband recovering from back surgery and I thought I had scanned the exhibits on my 

computer. However, I cannot locate them and I believe the due date is today, September 

25. I am requesting until October 2, 2015, in order to file the Reporter's Record.

Thank you,

Gayla R. May

27th District Court

Bell-Lampasas Counties
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWind Tunnel Investigation of Passive Porosity Applied to the Leading-Edge Extension and Leading-Edge Flaps on a Slender Wing at Subsonic SpeedA wind tunnel experiment was conducted in the NASA Langley Research Center 7- by 10-Foot High Speed Tunnel to determine the effects of passive surface porosity on the subsonic vortex flow interactions about a general research fighter configuration. Flow-through porosity was applied to the leading-edge extension, or LEX, and leading-edge flaps mounted to a 65deg cropped delta wing model as a potential vortex flow control technique at high angles of attack. All combinations of porous and nonporous LEX and flaps were investigated. Wing upper surface static pressure distributions and six-component forces and moments were obtained at a free-stream Mach number of 0.20 corresponding to a Reynolds number of 1.35(106) per foot, angles of attack up to 45deg, angles of sideslip of 0deg and +/-5deg, and leading-edge flap deflections of 0deg and 30deg.Document ID20170004505Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsErickson, Gary E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 9, 2017Publication DateMarch 1, 2017Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-26349NASA-TM-2017-219596L-20784Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 147016.03.07.04.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170004505.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Joseph Hendler, a Minor, by Abraham Hendler, His Father and Next Friend, and Esther Hendler, a Minor, by Abraham Hendler, Her Father and Next Friend, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Miriam Wolozin, Nat Wolozin, Chicago Transit Authority, a Municipal Corporation, and Harry J. Zanotti, Defendants-Appellees.

Gen. No. 50,789.

First Judicial District.

January 20, 1969.

Leo S. Karlin and Daniel Karlin, of Chicago, for appellants; George J. Schaller, O. R. Hamlink, Jerome F. Dixon, Erwin Wright, and Hubbard, Hubbard, O’Brien & Hall, of Chicago (Alvin G. Hubbard, Reese Hubbard, and Frederick W. Temple, of counsel), for appellees.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE ABRA-HAMSON.

Not to be published in full.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   1,789,870
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              996,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                               103,900
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,952,274
<PP&E>                                                   2,278,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1,453,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           3,881,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,447,058
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                  1,731
<COMMON>                                                     7,093
<OTHER-SE>                                               2,120,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             2,129,505
<SALES>                                                  1,160,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,160,859
<CGS>                                                       98,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            5,593,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          34,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (4,443,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (4,443,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (4,443,060)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.70)


</TABLE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



 
 

EXHIBIT 10.3    
  


2003

KEY EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN

SCOTT'S LIQUID GOLD-INC.  


Purpose of the Plan  


        The purpose of the Key Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (the "Plan") is to provide incentive to the Company's key executives to maximize corporate earnings for 2003
and to reward such executives based upon performance. 


Structure of the Plan  


        This Plan is constructed to reserve exclusively to the shareholders the first $1 million in pre-tax earnings. Thereafter, for each
$1 million in additional pre-tax earnings, a bonus of $100,000 will be paid as incentive bonus. 


        This
Plan is also constructed so as to encourage Management to expend every effort possible to increase pre-tax earnings in excess of $1 million. The more
pre-tax profit the Company makes, the greater the bonus and the greater the return to the Company's shareholders. Further, by not capping bonuses to be paid under this Plan, the Board of
Directors believes that the incentives to the Company's executives to make larger and larger profits will not be limited. 


Plan Provisions  


        1.
For 2003, a bonus pool equal to 10% of pre-tax earnings in excess of $1 million will be set aside for distribution to the Company's key executives who are employed
by the Company at December 31, 2003. 


        2.
Partial distributions of the bonus pool may be made in December of 2003, but the final distribution is only to be made after the close of the year, based upon audited
pre-tax profits, during the quarter following the close of the fiscal year. 


        3.
Bonuses, if any, for 2003, will be divided among the Company's four executive officers as follows: President and Chief Executive Officer, 31%; Vice President—Marketing,
25%;Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, 22%; and Vice President—Operations and Corporate Secretary 22%. 


        4.
For purposes of this Plan, net pre-tax earnings and pre-tax profits shall be determined without the deduction or addition of gains or losses from infrequent or
unusual events or transactions or from extraordinary items. The exclusion of any such event, transaction or item shall be determined by action of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of the Company after reviewing the proposed or final statements of income of the Company for the relevant period and reviewing the accounting treatment of any such event, transaction or item by the
Company's independent accountants. 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.3
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A2016. ESTES PARK, L.P. v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

On May 17, 2016, this Court granted Estes Park, L.P.’s application for

interlocutory appeal in this condemnation case. In July 2016, Estes Park, L.P. (“Estes

Park”) filed an emergency motion for supersedeas. In response, the Department of

Transportation (“DOT”) explained that, although it disagreed with Estes Park’s

assertion that the subject property is public property, out of an abundance of caution,

it nonetheless filed an application with the State Commission on the Condemnation

of Public Property (the “Commission”). Furthermore, the DOT agreed to refrain from

conducting any activity on the Estes Park property unless and until the Commission

approves the condemnation. Based on this representation, this Court denied Estes

Park’s motion for emergency relief. 

After careful consideration and review, we conclude that the application for

interlocutory appeal was improvidently granted, and it is ordered that this appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. It is noted that the denial of interlocutory review does not

constitute an adjudication on the merits. Holmes v. Achor Ctr., 249 Ga. App. 184,

187 (1) (547 SE2d 332) (2001). Accordingly, to the extent the issues ripe for

appellate consideration by this Court are not mooted by the findings of the

Commission, Estes Park is not precluded from further appellate review of this case. 

February 16, 2017
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/16/2017