alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q
FOR PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             344
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,263
<INVENTORY>                                      3,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,867
<PP&E>                                          82,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,576
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,474
<OTHER-SE>                                       (561)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,220
<SALES>                                         10,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,647
<CGS>                                            7,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    39
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,504)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  ($0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.38)


</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# 152 ) ll-E- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/2008 9:50:58 AM Sheet 152 of 276

## CONVERSATIO N RECOR D 

# A G O !H | P. 2

TIM E 

## II-E- 3 TYP E • VISI T • CONFERENC E Locatio n o f Visit/Conferenc**" : J%TELEPHON E • INCOMIN G 0 OUTGOIN G NAM E O F PERSON(S ) CONTACTE D O R I N CONTAC T WIT H YO U II A _^ r*~"__ . • ORGANIZATIO N (Office , dept. , bureau , etc. ) TELEPHON E NO . 

## 'Hit, 12/-;:/?/ SUBJEC T O'O

V 7 f. ROUTIN G NAME/SYMBO L 

## M O * O- ' a ? t a •; , ' 

## Mac vawe(/IN T

SUMMAR Y 

## T tofd ' Mr. 'Ae^Acrri

-AJG. JfaAlAj. -rx. !»-~ r 

## T <? ATkc~A A ixjt, ^T l Se./lo//% ^ T-,3 ,/7e a 

## ^

r^ - ? ^ rg/T . Aor

Co*

r 

## _ . -rAp /. r• - 1 CL 

# Is A

-J A! A

## e r\

rt -p J Vff m nA-a * A

## f <x </, . g> ^ JLkAL 

# ^(r>^ WfrPcJ

: i. D . - O C . u . l^t- i -•<*

» n Jg~1~:

* i • , O ; A\J



### i J 

## _2L_ir £ y . 

## / \ f r

- ^ / 

# f XI C'-P />. ' v* * 

# T - fg>r-H h <L- inn 

# ,Vg.r. s )

IA iL • 4 - A«, AA-ZA 

# .^2 . •:~** I __ , _

_ 

# /C-

• o rJ •* - & ^ 

## ^ Ti. :'. - j /- . o AAAa

. V i ~f~<°

in c<A<_

_e. cx^<L 

# lA'•^Ae.c:

i o'A'S. 

# fo 

# AAA • d & a i / e r <

_1 * TU ( L / * : 

# /<

? r b / i o.-ec^rz.
i i-. r-

r. - T 

# 3 Ao

: 

## J noe^ 

# AJJ f oviap. fk

*s i / - -hof/ki at/

or 

# ia Z?C>t*. Kr> 6-nd JT o v

Yr* /Y / i J o^n diS

h& AALA) 

# k a ££u rs ] A

## J J~k At -Tk g fCC

CAAJ ACTIO N REQUIRE D 

# Oj

& 

# ha c/< /

A SAT 

# Aar.

50271-10 1 O GP O : 198 5 O - 461-27 5 (20090 ) CONVERSATIO N RECOR D NAM E O F PERSO N DOCUMENTIN G CONVERSATIO N 

## yOK rc*-" A-r? <? A ACTIO N TAKE N
SIGNATUR E SIGNATUR E z A -'— ' y •

TITL E 

### -^* > 

### "

*"*!.. Wa_a_ ^ DAT E

DAT E 

## -?d »
/ OPTIONA L FOR M 27 1 (12-76 ) DEPARTMEN TO F DEFENS E
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             319
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   319     
<PP&E>                                               0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     319     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       163,188
<OTHER-SE>                                    (144,878)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       319
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
#### Edna M. Mastracchio *v.*John S. Mastracchio

Argued June 4

decided June *4,*1968

*Darius J. Spain,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Leonard S. Paoletta,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied.
EX-10.7(A)



 





Exhibit 10.7(a)




Description of Park National Corporation

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan




     Park National Corporation (“Park”) adopted the Park National Corporation Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan or “SERP” in December 1996. The SERP currently benefits 30 current and
former officers of Park and its subsidiaries, including: (a) William T. McConnell, who serves as
Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of each of Park and The Park National
Bank, a subsidiary of Park (“PNB”); (b) C. Daniel DeLawder, who serves as Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of each of Park and PNB; and (c) John W. Kozak, who serves as Chief
Financial Officer of Park and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PNB. David
L. Trautman, who serves as President and Secretary of Park and as President of PNB, does not
participate in the SERP.



     The SERP is a non-qualified benefit plan designed to restore benefits lost due to limitations
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, on the amount of compensation covered by and
the benefits payable under a defined benefit plan such as the Park National Corporation Defined
Benefit Pension Plan. Park has purchased life insurance contracts to fund the SERP. The SERP is
designed to provide an annual targeted retirement benefit of approximately $53,000, $128,000 and
$4,000 for Messrs. McConnell, DeLawder and Kozak, respectively. These additional benefits are not
guaranteed and are dependent upon the earnings from the related life insurance contracts compared
to the average yield on three-month Treasury bills. The SERP also provides a life insurance
benefit to a current or former officer of Park or one of its subsidiaries participating in the SERP
who dies before age 86. The amount of this life insurance benefit will be equal to the present
value of the stream of future benefits which would have been paid to the individual until age 86
but had not been paid at the time of the individual’s death.
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HealthChoice, Inc.  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed  with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
 John C. Stuecheli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
 to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as adopted pursuant to S 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
 of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

           (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements of  Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)  The information contained in  the Report fairly presents,  in
           all material  respects,  the  financial condition  and  result  of
           operations of the Company.



 /s/ John C. Stuecheli

 John C. Stuecheli

 Chief Financial Officer

 August 15, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      20,212,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  259,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,541,208
<PP&E>                                       2,316,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                 612,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,341,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,334,283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    500,000
<COMMON>                                         5,130
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,387,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,341,834
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,295,785
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,016,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             311,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,239,728)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,239,728)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,239,728)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)
        

</TABLE>
#### Stan Kane, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nomad Mobile Homes, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Paul Sachs, Mobile Office, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, and Joseph Neidlinger, Defendants, Paul Sachs, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 52,476.

First District.

February 10, 1969.

George E. Dolezal, of Melrose Park, and Alan S. Ganz, of Chicago, for appellant; Altheimer, Gray, Naiburg, Strasburger & Lawton, of Chicago (Samuel T. Lawton, Jr., of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH.

Not to be published in full.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 10, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00783-CV

No. 05-13-00784-CV

IN RE DONALD GENE BLANTON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 86th District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 23078-86, 23592-86

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis 

Opinion by Justice Lewis

Relator contends the Kaufman County District Clerk has not complied with an order of 

this Court relating to a supplemental record for relator’s direct appeals. The facts and issues are 

well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have 

mandamus jurisdiction over the district clerk. See TEX. GOV=T CODE ANN. ' 22.221 (West 2010). 

Accordingly, we DISMISS relator=s petition for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

130783F.P05

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 204 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 204

   Relating to the retirement of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the 
                         United States Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 19 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

    Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr. Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Relating to the retirement of Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the 
                         United States Senate.

Whereas the Senate has been advised of the retirement of its Secretary, Walter 
        J. Stewart, on April 14, 1994; and
Whereas Walter J. Stewart has served the Senate with distinction for thirty-
        eight years, the last seven of which were as Secretary of the Senate: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That, effective April 15, 1994, as a token of the 
appreciation of the Senate for his long and faithful service, Walter J. 
Stewart is hereby designated as Secretary Emeritus of the United States 
Senate.

                                 <all>
```
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 173

To extend the time of the Senate Ethics Study Commission for making

its findings and recommendations to the Leadership.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 20 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. DOLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To extend the time of the Senate Ethics Study Commission

for making its findings and recommendations to the

Leadership.

1 Resolved, That S. Res. 111, which was adopted May

2 21, 1993, is hereby amended by striking ‘‘December 31,

3 1993’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘March 1,

4 1994’’.

Æ
# C_2014261EN.01003001.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/30

---

Action brought on 20 May 2014 — Construlink/OHIM — Wit-Software (GATEWIT)

(Case T-351/14)

2014/C 261/54

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Construlink — Tecnologias de Informação, SA (Lisboa, Portugal) (represented by: M. Lopes Rocha, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wit-Software, Consultoria e Software para a Internet Móvel, SA (Coimbra, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 March 2014 in Case R 1059/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 March 2014 in Case R 1059/2013-1;

| — | Consider the trade mark application No 10 128 262 GATEWIT fully sustained; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consider the trade mark application No 10 128 262 GATEWIT fully sustained;

| — | Order the OHMI and the Opponent to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the OHMI and the Opponent to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘GATEWIT’ for services in Class 42 — Community trade mark applicationNo 10 128 262

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Wit-Software, Consultoria e Software para a Internet Móvel, SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The figurative mark containing the word elements ‘wit software’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 42 as well as the national registration of the company name ‘Wit-Software, Consultoria e Software para a Internet Móvel, SA’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The decision of the Opposition Division was annulled and the trade mark applied for rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Violation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Violation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Violation of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Violation of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-126-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<Page>

                                                                     [LOGO]


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 20 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 033-37577) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 7, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 205 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 205

 Relative to the death of Richard M. Nixon, a former President of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 25 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

   Mr. Mitchell (for himself and Mr.  Dole) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Relative to the death of Richard M. Nixon, a former President of the 
                             United States.

    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep regret the 
announcement of the death of the Honorable Richard M. Nixon, a former President 
of the United States, a former Vice President of the United States, a former 
Representative, and former Senator from the State of California.
    Resolved, That in recognition of his illustrious statesmanship, his 
leadership in national and world affairs, his distinguished public service to 
his State and his Nation, and as a mark of respect to one who has held such 
eminent public station in life, the Presiding Officer of the Senate appoint a 
committee to consist of all the Members of the Senate to attend the funeral of 
the former President.
    Resolved, That the Senate hereby tender its deep sympathy to the members of 
the family of the former President in their sad bereavement.
    Resolved, That the Secretary communicate these resolutions to the House of 
Representatives and transmit a copy thereof to the family of the former 
President.
    Resolved, That when the Senate recesses today, it recess as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.

                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3552

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Michael Deshone Holmes,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Waterloo

____________

 Submitted: February 23, 2018

Filed: February 28, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Michael Holmes challenges the order of the

district court revoking his supervised release and imposing a 6-month sentence, 1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern 1

District of Iowa.
followed by 6 months ofsupervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

has submitted a brief arguing that the district court abused its discretion by revoking

Holmes’s supervised release, and that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion by revoking Holmes’s supervised release. See United States v.

Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). We further conclude

that Holmes’ssentence was not unreasonable, asthe district court properly considered

the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; there was no indication the court overlooked a

relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant

factors, see United States v. Johnson, 827 F.3d 740, 744 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of

review); and the sentence was within the Guidelines range, see United States v.

Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave

to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

-2-