alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 95 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 95

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

    To designate October 1993 as ``National Breast Cancer Awareness 
                                Month''.
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 95

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    To designate October 1993 as ``National Breast Cancer Awareness 
                                Month''.

Whereas breast cancer will strike an estimated 182,000 women and 1,000 men in 
        the United States in 1993;
Whereas the risk of developing breast cancer increases as a woman grows older;
Whereas breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in women, and 
        will kill an estimated 46,000 women and 300 men in 1993;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for localized breast cancer has risen from 78 
        percent in the 1940's to over 90 percent today;
Whereas most breast cancers are detected by the woman herself;
Whereas educating both the public and health care providers about the importance 
        of early detection will result in reducing breast cancer mortality;
Whereas appropriate use of screening mammography, in conjunction with clinical 
        examination and breast self-examination, can result in the detection of 
        many breast cancers early in their development and increase the survival 
        rate to nearly 100 percent;
Whereas data from controlled trials clearly demonstrate that deaths from breast 
        cancer are significantly reduced in women who have been screened by 
        mammography;
Whereas many women are reluctant to have screening mammograms for a variety of 
        reasons, such as the cost of testing, lack of information, or fear;
Whereas access to screening mammography is directly related to socioeconomic 
        status;
Whereas increased awareness about the importance of screening mammography will 
        result in the procedure being regularly requested by the patient and 
        recommended by the health care provider; and
Whereas it is projected that more women will use this lifesaving test as it 
        becomes increasingly available and affordable: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That October 1993 is 
designated as ``National Breast Cancer Awareness Month'' and the 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
upon the people of the United States to observe the month with 
appropriate programs and activities.

            Passed the Senate July 23 (legislative day, June 30), 1993.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Some relations between streamflow characteristics and the 
environment in the Delaware River region

#### Professional Paper 417-B

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp417B 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:37
# C_2014282EN.01004201.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/42

---

Action brought on 12 June 2014 — Volkswagen v OHIM (CHOICE)

(Case T-431/14)

2014/C 282/55

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by U. Sander, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 April 2014 in Case R 2019/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 April 2014 in Case R 2019/2013-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘CHOICE’ for goods and services in Classes 12, 28, 35 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 7 69  163

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
#### Bruno Garshva, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. City of Rockford, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 68-40.

Second District.

March 6, 1969.

Rehearing denied March 27, 1969.

John W. Nielsen, City Attorney, of Rockford, for appellant; Pedderson, Menzimer, Conde and Stoner, of Rockford, for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE ABRAHAMSON.

Not to be published in full.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10228-10229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4707]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Publication of State Plan Pursuant to the Help America Vote Act; 
Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission published a document 
in the Federal Register on February 10, 2010, concerning Puerto Rico's 
amended State plan. The document contained the wrong States.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, 202-566-3100.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 10, 2010, in the FR Doc. 2010-
2919, on page 6643, in the second and third

[[Page 10229]]

column, correct the SUMMARY caption to read:
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to sections 254(a)(11)(A) and 255(b) of the Help 
America Vote Act (HAVA), Public Law 107-252, the U.S. Election 
Assistance Commission (EAC) hereby causes to be published in the 
Federal Register changes to the HAVA State plans previously submitted 
by Puerto Rico.

    Dated: March 2, 2010.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-4707 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SCWC-21-0000710

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

IN THE INTEREST OF KH

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-21-0000710; FC-S NO. 18-00170)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Father-Appellant’s Application for Writ of 

Certiorari filed on December 29, 2022, is rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 28, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-21-0000710

28-FEB-2023

08:15 AM

Dkt. 10 ODAC
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Diabase sheets of the Taylor Glacier region, Victoria Land, 
Antarctica, with sections on petrography and sections on chemistry

#### Professional Paper 456-B

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp456B 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:09
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 19 (Friday, January 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1838]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended.
    The grant applications and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Diversity-promoting Institution Drug Abuse, Research 
Program (DIDARP).
    Date: March 3, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Nadine Rogers, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, 301-402-2105, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5b7aaa2a0b7b6abf785abaca1a4ebabacadeba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d0f121a180f0e134f3d1314191c53131415531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, B/START Review.
    Date: March 13, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
220, Rockville, MD 20852, (Virtual Meeting).

    Contact Person: Gerald L. McLaughlin, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Blvd., 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, 301-402-6626, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbaca6fafffeaa8ba5a2a3e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abccc69a9f9ecaebc5c2c385ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E9-1838 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Itec Environmental Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael E. Hofmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael E. Hofmann
----------------------
Michael E. Hofmann
Chief Financial Officer

May 22, 2003
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50454

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICKY LAMONT GARRETT

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:06-CR-82-ALL

Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricky Lamont Garrett appeals the sentence imposed following his guiltyplea conviction for possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of crack

cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(iii). Garrett argues for

the first time on appeal that his sentence was substantively unreasonable

because the guidelines sentence range was greater than necessary to meet the

requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Garrett acknowledges that a discretionary

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 31, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50454

2

sentence imposed within a properly calculated guidelines range is entitled to a

rebuttable presumption of reasonableness, citing Kimbrough v. United States,

128 S. Ct. 558, 574-75 (2007); however, he contends that his within-guidelines

sentence is not entitled to a presumption of reasonableness because the drug

offense guideline, U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, is not supported by empirical research and

may result in sentences greater than necessary in normal cases.

In the instant case, the district court imposed a within-guidelines

sentence, and there has been no finding by the district court that § 2D1.1 is

flawed. Contrary to Garrett’s argument, the Kimbrough Court said nothing of

the applicability of the presumption of reasonableness. While the Supreme

Court did note that the drug trafficking guideline was based upon drug quantity

and not empirical research, the Court held only that a district court may

sentence a defendant outside of the guidelines range on the basis that it had

determined that the guidelines range was flawed, not that the permissible

appellate court presumption is inapplicable in drug trafficking cases. See

Kimbrough, 128 S. Ct. at 564, 567, 571-76. Garrett’s reliance upon Kimbrough

to challenge the appellate presumption is therefore misplaced, and he has failed

to show that the presumption should not be applied. Moreover, Garrett has

failed to establish that his sentence is unreasonable. The district court’s

judgment is therefore affirmed.

We note that in response to Anders motions filed by Garrett’s appointed

counsel we ordered that counsel address the impact of recent amendments to

§ 2D1.1(c). The federal public defender appointed in place of Garrett’s previous

counsel has not briefed that issue, and so we do not address it here. Our review

will not preclude Garrett from raising that issue in the district court in a motion

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582, if such relief is available. See United States v.

Segler, 37 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
EX-10.68



 





EXHIBIT 10.68




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

THE NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION

VALUE APPRECIATION PLAN FOR YEARS 2006 TO 2015




     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of The North American Coal Corporation
(the “Company”), hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to The North American Coal Corporation Value
Appreciation Plan for Years 2006 to 2015 (the “Plan”), effective as of January 1, 2006. Words and
phrases used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Plan are used herein as so
defined.



Section 1




     The first sentence of Section 5.2(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:



     “Each Participant’s interest in his VAP Account under this Plan shall vest at the rate of 20
percent for each year during which a Participant remains in the continuous employ of the Company or
a Subsidiary following the January 1st of the year in which a Participant is first
credited with a VAP Target Amount under the Plan; provided however, that a Participant’s interest
in his VAP Account shall become immediately 100 percent vested in the event (i) of such
Participant’s death or Disability while employed by the Company or a Subsidiary; (ii) such
Participant remains in the continuous employ of the Company or a Subsidiary through December 31,
2015 or (iii) of such Participant’s termination of employment with the Company or a Subsidiary at
or after age 55 with at least 10 years of service or at or after age 65 (i.e., retirement).”






1
October 27, 2015

Mr. Brian Jones

iDream Images

, LLC

322 Devon Road

Chillicothe, Ohio 45601

Dear Mr. Jones :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request posted to the docket on July 30, 2015, on behalf of

iDream Images, LLC filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3267 , but we are unable to process

your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the

following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Avia tion A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11 .63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34