alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) Deutsche Bank

 

1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

 

Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TOCOMPLIANCE

 

COMM 2015-CCRE25

 

The undersigned, David Co, a Directorof Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a"Certifying Servicer") under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), by and among, DeutscheMortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, asSpecial Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, here bycertifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:

 

A) A review of such CertifyingServicer's activities from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the"reporting period") and of such Certifying Servicer's performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and

B) That, as to the best ofsuch officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respectsthroughout the reporting period.

 

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYAMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator

 

/s/ David Co

BY: David Co 

Title:  Director

Date: March 1, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7967 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7967

    To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to modify provisions relating to 
withdrawal, suspension, or limitation of country designation under the 
                   Generalized System of Preferences.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2024

 Mr. Smucker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to modify provisions relating to 
withdrawal, suspension, or limitation of country designation under the 
                   Generalized System of Preferences.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO WITHDRAWAL, 
              SUSPENSION, OR LIMITATION OF COUNTRY DESIGNATION UNDER 
              THE GENERALIZED SYSTEM OF PREFERENCES.

    Section 502(d)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. (2462(d)(1)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``the President shall consider the 
        factors'' and inserting ``the President--
                    ``(A) shall consider--
                            ``(i) the factors'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting a 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) the likely impacts of any such 
                        action on working toward, or continuing to 
                        meet, the criteria and factors described in 
                        subsections (b) and (c) of this section; and
                            ``(iii) the likely impacts of any such 
                        action on workers and populations in the 
                        country that such criteria and factors are 
                        intended to help; and
                    ``(B) take all available steps to facilitate 
                continued duty-free treatment under this title for 
                products with respect to which the imposition of duties 
                is likely--
                            ``(i) to have an adverse effect on meeting 
                        the criteria and factors described in 
                        subsections (b) and (c) of this section; or
                            ``(ii) result in severe economic harm to 
                        the populations that such criteria and factors 
                        are intended to help.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         13,335
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (500)
<INVENTORY>                                    8,155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               45,639
<PP&E>                                         496,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (496,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 48,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          217,610
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       19,333
<OTHER-SE>                                     (188,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   48,234
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,242
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  183,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,400)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,624)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.005)
        


</TABLE>
§ 99.303 Extension of time for completing planned studies. ( a ) Upon review of a drug or device manufacturer's proposed protocols and schedules for conducting studies needed for the submission of a supplemental application for a new use, FDA may, with or without a request for an extension from the manufacturer, determine that such studies cannot be completed and submitted within 36 months. The agency may exercise its discretion in extending the time period for completing the studies and submitting a supplemental application. Extensions under this paragraph are not subject to any time limit, but shall be made before the manufacturer begins the studies needed for the submission of a supplemental application for the new use.
( b ) The manufacturer may, after beginning the studies needed for the submission of a supplemental application for a new use, request in writing that FDA extend the time period for conducting studies needed for the submission of a supplemental application for a new use and submitting a supplemental application to FDA. FDA may grant or deny the request or, after consulting the manufacturer, grant an extension different from that requested by the manufacturer. FDA may grant a manufacturer's request for an extension if FDA determines that the manufacturer has acted with due diligence to conduct the studies needed for the submission of a supplemental application for a new use and to submit such a supplemental application to FDA in a timely manner and that, despite such actions, the manufacturer needs additional time to complete the studies and submit the supplemental application. Extensions under this paragraph shall not exceed 24 months.
( c ) If FDA extends the time period for completing the studies and submitting a supplemental application under paragraph (a) of this section after the manufacturer has submitted a certification under § 99.201(a)(4)(ii)(B), or if FDA grants a manufacturer's request for an extension under paragraph (b) of this section, the manufacturer shall submit a new certification under § 99.201(a)(4)(ii)(B) that sets forth the timeframe within which clinical studies will be completed and a supplemental application will be submitted to FDA.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 06, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 06, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0179. VIRGINIA MARSHALL v. ACE HOMES LLC. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15A10448
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1154

TANYA JONES; DONNA JONES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus EMC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INCORPORATED; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC; GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:06-cv-03038) Submitted: October 15, 2007 Decided: October 24, 2007 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tanya Jones, Donna Jones, Appellants Pro Se. David Samuel Panzer, GREENBERG & TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Mark David Meyer, ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Brian L. Moffet, GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tanya and Donna Jones appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. EMC Mortgage Co., Inc. , No. 8:06-cv-03038 (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 15 9 . ALBERT GRAVI TT v . MASTEC NORTH AMERI CA I NC.

Al b ert G rav i t t s eek s d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew o f t h e s up e r io r co u rt ’ s o rd er

rem an di n g h i s cas e t o t h e St at e Bo ard o f W o rk ers ’ Co m p en s at i o n , wh i ch prev i o u s l y

d en ied h i s req u es t fo r wo rk ers ’ co m p en s at i o n b en efi t s . Bas ed o n o u r rev i ew o f t h e

reco rd an d t h e p ro ced u ral p os t ure of t h is cas e, we co n cl u d e t h at Grav i t t ’ s req u es t fo r

ap p el l at e rev i ew i s p rem at u re. Co n s eq u en t l y , t his a pplicat i o n i s h ereb y D ISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/23/2015 December 23, 2015
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8089 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require certain additional 

provider screening under the Medicaid program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2024 

Mr. MIKE GARCIA of California (for himself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require 

certain additional provider screening under the Medicaid 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare and Medicaid 

5 Fraud Prevention Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MEDICAID PROVIDER SCREENING REQUIREMENTS. 

7 Section 1902(kk)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 1396a(kk)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘The State’’ and inserting: 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The State’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8089 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(B) ADDITIONAL PROVIDER SCREEN4 ING.—Beginning January 1, 2025, as part of 

5 the enrollment (or revalidation of enrollment) of 

6 a provider or supplier under this title, and not 

7 less frequently than quarterly during the period 

8 that such provider or supplier is so enrolled, the 

9 State conducts a check of the Death Master 

10 File (as such term is defined in section 203(d) 

11 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013) to deter12 mine whether such provider or supplier is de13 ceased.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
Exhibit  10.2

                        AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


     The CONSULTING AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated as of the March 14, 2002, by
and between PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING SERVICES GROUP, INC., of
Tampa, Florida ("PMCS"), and PICK-UPS PLUS, INC., a Delaware corporation with
its principal place of business in Mason, Ohio (the "Company"), is hereby
amended as follows:

     This Amendment to the Agreement will supercede, replace and amend the
Agreement only as specifically set forth herein.  All other provisions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     The parties hereto agree, effective immediately, upon execution, PMCS will
no longer be compensated by "Warrants".

     Section 2. COMPENSATION.  Shall be amended as follows:

     2.     COMPENSATION.  As  consideration  for the services to be rendered by
PMCS  under  this  Agreement,  the Company agrees to compensate PMCS as follows:

     (a)     Stock.  As consideration for its Consulting Services (as defined in
Exhibit  A  to  the Agreement), PMCS shall be compensated with the Three Million
(3,000,000)  shares  of  the  common stock of the Company (the "Common Shares"),
previously  issued  by  the  Company.  Additionally,  in  consideration  of  the
agreement  by  the  parties  to delete section (b) Warrants, as set forth in the
original Agreement, the Company shall issue to PMCS and additional Three Million
(3,000,000) shares of the common stock of the Company (the "Additional Shares").

          (b)     deleted


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement as
of the date first above written.

     THE  COMPANY
Pick-Ups  Plus,  Inc.

By:   /s/ Robert White
     ____________________________________
     Robert  White,  Its  CFO


     PMCS
     /s/ Merritt W. Jesson
     ___________________________________
     Merritt  W.  Jesson,  Its  President
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128497 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128497 

 COA: 258639 

Kalamazoo CC: 03-001148-FH 

TERRY DEWAYNE WETHINGTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

l1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
§ 1.501(c)(29)-1 CO-OP Health Insurance Issuers. ( a ) *Organizations must notify the Commissioner that they are applying for recognition of section 501(c)(29) status.* An organization will not be treated as described in section 501(c)(29) unless the organization has given notice to the Commissioner that it is applying for recognition as an organization described in section 501(c)(29) in the manner prescribed by the Commissioner in published guidance.
( b ) *Effective date of recognition of section 501(c)(29) status.* An organization may be recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(29) as of a date prior to the date of the notice required by paragraph (a) of this section if the notice is given in the manner and within the time prescribed by the Commissioner and the organization's purposes and activities prior to giving such notice were consistent with the requirements for exempt status under section 501(c)(29). However, an organization may not be recognized as an organization described in section 501(c)(29) before the later of its formation or March 23, 2010.
( c ) *Effective/applicability date.* Paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are applicable beginning February 7, 2012.
[T.D. 9709, 80 FR 4793, Jan. 29, 2015]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________ ) MOHAMMED ABDULLAH ) TAHA MATTAN (ISN 684), ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-CV-0745 (RCL) ) BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) ORDER Upon consideration of Respondents’ Consent Motion [1183] for Extension of Time to Respond to Petitioner’s Motion for Expedited Judgment, it is hereby ORDERED that the Respondents are allowed until June 1, 2009, to file their opposition ; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondents' Motion [1163] for Stay is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.
Date: May 19 , 2009.

___ /s/

______________________________ ROYCE C. LAMBERTH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### Vincent J. Rossignol *v.*Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc., et al.

Submitted January 3

decided February 13, 1968

*Paul W. Orth,*in support of the motion.

*John Crosskey,*in opposition.

The portion of the plaintiff’s motion concerning taxation of costs in the Supreme Court having been considered, the court finds nothing erroneous in the clerk’s taxation of costs in the appeal from the Superior Court in Litchfield County; the motion so far as it relates to the taxation of costs in the Superior Court is dismissed. Practice Book § 332.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.1.1  


 
  AMENDMENT TO MOVIE GALLERY, INC.
  1994 STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED    
    
    June 13, 2000    
  


        Section 4 of the Movie Gallery, Inc. 1994 Stock Plan, as amended, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with a new Section 4 as
follows: 



        "4.    Stock Subject to Plan.    There shall be reserved for issuance under the Plan 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock
of the Company ("Stock") or the number of shares of Stock, which, in accordance with the provisions of Section 13 hereof, shall be substituted therefore. Such shares may be treasury shares. If
an option or stock appreciation right granted under the Plan shall expire or terminate for any reason without having been exercised in full, shares subject to the unexercised portion thereof shall
again be available for the purposes of the Plan." 










QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO MOVIE GALLERY, INC. 1994 STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED June 13, 2000
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.43    
  


May 28th,
2002 


Andrew
Uprichard, MD

92 Bullard St.

Sherborn, MA 01770 


Dear
Andrew, 


        I
am pleased to offer you the position of Chief Operating Officer reporting to myself at a bi-weekly rate of $11,153.85, which annualizes to $290,000 per year. For the first
year only (August 1, 2002 though December 31st, 2002), we will pay your cash bonus as a signing bonus of $25,000. For 2003 and beyond, your bonus target will be 20%,
subject to being an employee in good standing. Compensation is reviewed every January for all employees and is subject to performance-based increases. Your first review will be in January of 2003. 



        Employment
at ArQule is at-will and is contingent upon your execution of the company's standard Non-Disclosure & Inventions Agreement and verification of
authorization to work in the United States. In the event of termination without cause, (cause including, but not being limited to, failure to perform duties, refusal to follow reasonable instructions,
dishonesty, moral turpitude or breach of confidentiality) or in the event of a change in control resulting in the scope of your responsibilities being substantially reduced, you will be eligible to
receive 12 months of salary and benefits. 


        Subject
to the approval of the ArQule Board of Directors, you would also receive 125,000-150,000 options to purchase common stock of ArQule, Inc. These options would
vest at a rate of twenty-five percent annually commencing on the first anniversary of your employment with ArQule. 


        You
and your dependents are entitled to ArQule's comprehensive health package including medical and dental. You are also provided life insurance at two times your annual salary up to
$300,000 and long and short-term disability insurance. In addition, you will receive four weeks of paid leave, which will be
accrued on a monthly basis. You will also be eligible to enroll in our company sponsored 401K Plan on the first day of any quarter. 



        ArQule
is an organization that is building an outstanding reputation for innovation in Drug Discovery. Credit for this goes to every one of our employees. We look forward to you
accepting our offer and becoming part of the ArQule Team as of July 22, 2002. 


        If
you need further information regarding this offer or any other aspect of employment at ArQule feel free to reach me either by phone (781)-994-3311 or via email
at shill@arqule.com 


        With
best regards, 



	

/s/ Stephen A. Hill

Stephen Hill

Chief Executive Officer, ArQule, Inc.	
 	

 	

Accepted by: /s/ Andrew Uprichard

Andrew Uprichard













QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.43