alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10865

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSEPH ARTHUR BOLTON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-24-1

Before STEWART, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph Arthur Bolton appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty

plea conviction for making threats against the President of the United States in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 871. He argues that the district court erred in enhancing

his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2A6.1(b)(1).

We review the procedural soundness and substantive reasonableness of

Bolton’s sentence under the abuse-of-discretion standard of review. Gall v.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 16, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-10865

2

United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 594 (2007). The district court’s determination

that, pursuantto § 2A6.1(b)(1), Bolton’s conduct evidenced an intentto carry out

his threats is a factual finding and must be reviewed for clear error. United

States v. Goynes, 175 F.3d 350, 353 (5th Cir. 1999).

Because Bolton solicited another person to assassinate the President and

because he attempted to travel to the President’s ranch for reconnaissance

purposes, the district court did not clearly err in applying the § 2A6.1(b)(1)

enhancement. See Goynes, 175 F.3d at 355. In addition, Bolton points to

nothing in the Guidelines that precludes application ofthe § 2A6.1 enhancement

if the defendant could not have ultimately carried out his threat. Accordingly,

the district court did not clearly err in applying the § 2A6.1(b)(1) enhancement.

Moreover, because the district court imposed a sentence within the properly

calculated guidelines range, it is presumptively reasonable. Gall, 128 S. Ct. at

597; Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462 (2007); United States v. Alonzo,

435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Bolton’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  	/s/Kevin Perry

Name:		  Kevin Perry
Title:	  Chief Financial Officer

Date:		  August 16, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.4275 Dowel cutting instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* A dowel cutting instrument is a device used to cut dowels of bone for bone grafting.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Extension of public comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                        In the February 9, 2010 issue of the                         **Federal Register**                         (75 FR 6364), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), published its proposed update to its current process for requesting a variance from vegetation standards for levees and floodwalls for public comment. In that notice, the Corps stated that written comments must be submitted on or before March 11, 2010. Instructions for submitting comments are provided in the February 9, 2010,                         **Federal Register**                         notice. In response to several requests, the Corps has decided to extend the public comment period to April 25, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas J. Wade, Headquarters, Engineering and Construction Community of Practice, Washington, DC, at 202-761-4668.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Dated: March 5, 2010.

John W. Hunter,

Engineering and Construction, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

[FR Doc. 2010-5126 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 138 (Friday, July 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 42072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16957]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8798]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: The Plains Indians: Artists of Earth and Sky'' 
Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Plains Indians: Artists of Earth and 
Sky,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United 
States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant 
to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The 
Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, Kansas City, MO, from on or about 
September 19, 2014, until on or about January 11, 2015; The 
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about March 2, 
2015, until on or about May 10, 2015, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: July 14, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-16957 Filed 7-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

MICHAEL J. HALPRIN 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2159 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

Board File No. C1-14-1043 

(United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 

No. 12-3001-ELF) 

Attorney Registration No. 38373 

(Philadelphia) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM: 

 AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2015, Michael J. Halprin, having been 

suspended from the practice of law in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania for a period of six and one-half months by Orders of the 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dated July 9, 

2014, October 15, 2014, November 4, 2014 and November 10, 2014; the said Michael 

J. Halprin having been directed on April 22, 2015, to inform this Court of any claim he 

has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth 

would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is 

 ORDERED that Michael J. Halprin is suspended from the practice of law 

in this Commonwealth for a period of six and one-half months, retroactive to December 

2, 2014, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  	/s/Kevin Perry

Name:		  Kevin Perry
Title:	  Chief Financial Officer

Date:		  August 15, 2005
# C_2015007EN.01004401.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/44

---

Action brought on 7 November 2014 — Hikari Miso v OHIM — Nishimoto Trading (Hikari)

(Case T-751/14)

(2015/C 007/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hikari Miso Co. Ltd (Suwa-gun, Japan) (represented by: D. McFarland, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nishimoto Trading Co. Ltd (Santa Fe Springs, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration No 9 5 69  501

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2014 in Case R 2394/2013-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul and/or set aside the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul and/or set aside the contested decision;

| — | award the costs in favour of the Applicant and reverse the costs award made by the Fourth Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

award the costs in favour of the Applicant and reverse the costs award made by the Fourth Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal is based upon errors of law and/or fact; |
| --- | --- |

—

The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal is based upon errors of law and/or fact;

| — | The Fourth Board of Appeal exceeded its powers and function, by indulging in accepting as proven facts submissions which amounted to no more than suppositions and hypothesis, in respect of which no evidence had been adduced. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Fourth Board of Appeal exceeded its powers and function, by indulging in accepting as proven facts submissions which amounted to no more than suppositions and hypothesis, in respect of which no evidence had been adduced.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2015-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                     Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                     I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                     All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated March 23,   2017 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        | /s/ Brian E. Schaaf                                |
|                        | Brian E. Schaaf                                    |
|                        | Vice President and   Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford Motor Credit   Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior officer in   charge of servicing function) |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 145 (Thursday, July 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCOS05000 L1010 PH]


Notice of Public Meeting, BLM Colorado Southwest Resource 
Advisory Council Meeting; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) published a document in 
the Federal Register of April 3, 2009, notifying the public regarding 
meeting dates and locations for the BLM Colorado Southwest Resource 
Advisory Council (RAC). The location of the August 28, 2009 meeting was 
incorrect.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Sharrow, BLM Uncompahgre Field 
Manager, 2505 S. Townsend Ave., Montrose, CO 81401, 970-240-5300; or 
Erin Curtis, Public Affairs Specialist, 2815 H Rd., Grand Junction, CO 
81506, 970-244-3097.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of April 3, 2009, FR Doc. E9-7606, on page 
15519, the second column, correct the ADDRESSES caption to read:

ADDRESSES: The Southwest Colorado RAC meetings will be held May 29, 
2009, in Dolores, CO, at the Anasazi Heritage Center, 27501 Highway 
184, Dolores, CO 81323; August 28, 2009, at the Mary Stigall Theater in 
the Mosley Arts Center, 304 Silver Street in Lake City, CO 81235; and 
November 6, 2009, in Delta, CO at the Bill Heddles Recreation Center, 
530 Gunnison River Drive, Delta, CO 81416. Field trips will be 
conducted to appropriate sites the day before each scheduled meeting. 
All Southwest Colorado RAC meetings will begin at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 4 p.m., with public comment periods regarding matters on 
the agenda at 2:30 p.m.

Barbara Sharrow,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. E9-18215 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Spectra before and after

T his information is confidential.
#### § 1.514(e)-1 Allocation rules.

Where only a portion of property is debt-financed property, proper allocation of the basis, indebtedness, income, and deductions with respect to such property must be made to determine the amount of income or gain derived from such property which is to be treated as unrelated debt-financed income. See examples 2 and 3 of paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of § 1.514(b)-1 and examples 1, (2), and (3) of paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of § 1.514(b)-1 for illustrations of proper allocation.

[T.D. 7229, 37 FR 28153, Dec. 21, 1972]
Order entered April 14 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00294
- CV
IN RE BANCORPSOUTH BANK, Relator Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 11
- 15 742 

### O RDER In accordance with the Court’s opinion issued this date, the petition for writ of mandamus is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED . The Court ORDERS the trial judge, the Honorable Lori C. Hockett , Judge of the 255th District Court, to VACATE her January 24, 2014 Order to Withhold Distributions and, to the degree it is applicable to BancorpSouth Bank as trustee of the Anne Cook Slicker and Joseph A. Slicker 1993 Trust for the Benefit of William Cook Slicker, vacate that portion of her January 24, 2014 Order o n Motion for Temporary Orders Pending Appeal that orders “that an order of withholding is issued to any trust ordering that any mandatory distributions from a trust in which William C. Slicker is the beneficiary, shall withhold distributions and pay it to Phyllis Slicker.” Should the trial judge fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue.The Court ORDERS the trial judge to file with this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order , a certified copy of her order issued in compliance with this order. We ORDER that relator recover its costs of this original proceeding from real party in interest , Phyllis Slicker.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Matthew Costello

Submitted February 13

decided March 6, 1968

*William K. Bennett,*in support of the petition.

*Arnold Maride,*chief prosecuting attorney, in opposition.

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
#### § 1.41-0A Table of contents.

This section lists the paragraphs contained in §§ 1.41-0A, 1.41-3A, 1.41-4A and 1.41-5A.

## § 1.41-0A Table of contents.

## § 1.41-3A Base period research expense.

(a) Number of years in base period.

(b) New taxpayers.

(c) Definition of base period research expenses.

(d) Special rules for short taxable years.

(1) Short determination year.

(2) Short base period year.

(3) Years overlapping the effective dates of section 41 (section 44F).

(i) Determination years.

(ii) Base period years.

(4) Number of months in a short taxable year.

(e) Examples.

## § 1.41-4A Qualified research for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1986.

(a) General rule.

(b) Activities outside the United States.

(1) In-house research.

(2) Contract research.

(c) Social sciences or humanities.

(d) Research funded by any grant, contract, or otherwise.

(1) In general.

(2) Research in which taxpayer retains no rights.

(3) Research in which the taxpayer retains substantial rights.

(i) In general.

(ii) Pro rata allocation.

(iii) Project-by-project determination.

(4) Independent research and development under the Federal Acquisition Regulations System and similar provisions.

(5) Funding determinable only in subsequent taxable year.

(6) Examples.

## § 1.41-5A Basic research for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1987.

(a) In general.

(b) Trade or business requirement.

(c) Prepaid amounts.

(1) In general.

(2) Transfers of property.

(d) Written research agreement.

(1) In general.

(2) Agreement between a corporation and a qualified organization after June 30, 1983.

(i) In general.

(ii) Transfers of property.

(3) Agreement between a qualified fund and a qualified educational organization after June 30, 1983.

(e) Exclusions.

(1) Research conducted outside the United States.

(2) Research in the social sciences or humanities.

(f) Procedure for making an election to be treated as a qualified fund.

[T.D. 8930, 66 FR 295, Jan. 3, 2001]
#### § 1.455-1 Treatment of prepaid subscription income.

Effective with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1957, section 455 permits certain taxpayers to elect with respect to a trade or business in connection with which prepaid subscription income is received, to include such income in gross income for the taxable years during which a liability exists to furnish or deliver a newspaper, magazine, or other periodical. If a taxpayer does not elect to treat prepaid subscription income under the provisions of section 455, such income is includible in gross income for the taxable year in which received by the taxpayer, unless under the method or practice of accounting used in computing taxable income such amount is to be properly accounted for as of a different period.

[T.D. 6591, 27 FR 1798, Feb. 27, 1962]