alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc Teal, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: February 14, 2008 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                        
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|                        | Marc N. Teal
Principal Financial Officer
```

[115th Congress Public Law 17]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 81]]

Public Law 115-17
115th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 
 drug testing of unemployment compensation applicants. <<NOTE: Mar. 31, 
                        2017 -  [H.J. Res. 42]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Federal-State 
Unemployment Compensation Program; Middle Class Tax Relief and Job 
Creation Act of 2012 Provision on Establishing Appropriate Occupations 
for Drug Testing of Unemployment Compensation Applicants'' (published at 
81 Fed. Reg. 50298 (August 1, 2016)), and such rule shall have no force 
or effect.

    Approved March 31, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 42:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Feb. 15, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 13, 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### William Phelan et al. *v.*Planning and Zoning Board of the City of Milford

It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice *661Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

*Dennis F. Harrigan,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued December 2

decided December 2, 1969

The appellants filed a motion for reargument which was denied.
#### Richard T. Dunn, Jr. *v.*Frederick G. Reincke, Warden, Connecticut State Prison

Submitted January 26

decided February 6, 1968

*Arnold H. Klau,*in support of the motion.

The motion by the plaintiff to have the appellant’s brief in the case of *Gould*v. *Reincke,*155 Conn. 703, 236 A.2d 916, treated as his brief in his appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Principal Plus Fund L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,451,639
<SECURITIES>                                41,391,993
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,843,653<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,843,653<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (1,079,060)<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,342,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,367,755)<F4>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,367,755)<F4>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,367,755)<F4>
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, securities and receivables, total assets include
net unrealized gain on open contracts of $325,173, net option premiums
of $(180,000) and unrealized loss on Zero-Coupon U.S. Treasury Securities
of $172,656.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $842,497, accrued
brokerage fee of $166,116, accrued administrative expenses of
$181,552 and accrued management fees of $41,529.
<F3>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $586,990, net
change in unrealized of $(875,534), interest income of $1,334,884 and
change in valuation of Yield Pool of $(2,125,400).
<F4>Income-Pretax, Income Continuing and Net Income includes minority
interest in income of $53,988.
</FN>


</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate~** 

# (!Court of**§ppeaI~** 

# for tbejfeberaI (!Cirroit

IN 

### RE FRED T. PARKER 2011-1421 (Serial No. 09/815,567) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board ofPatent Appeals and Interferences. ON MOTION



### ORDER The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office moves for a 43-day extension of time, until February 29, 2012, to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. No further extensions should be anticipated.INREPARKER 

## JAN 1? 2012 Date

cc: Janet Pioli, Esq. Raymond T. Chen, Esq. s21 FOR THE COURT lsi Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2

FILED 

## u.s. COURTOFAPPEALS FOR THE FEDERALCIRCUIT



### JAN 172012

JANHORBAl.Y 

### CLERK
§ 884.5100 Obstetric anesthesia set. ( a ) *Identification.* An obstetric anesthesia set is an assembly of antiseptic solution, needles, needle guides, syringes, and other accessories, intended for use with an anesthetic drug. This device is used to administer regional blocks (e.g., paracervical, uterosacral, and pudendal) that may be used during labor, delivery, or both.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------


We consent to the use of our Auditors' Report dated October 23, 2002 in the Form
10-SB Registration  Statement of Winmark Enterprises,  Inc. for the registration
of shares of its common stock.



MANNING ELLIOTT
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Vancouver, Canada
April 7, 2003


/s/ "Manning Elliott"
--------------------------
MANNING ELLIOTT
VALIDITY OF STATUTE PROVIDING FOR. ATTACHMENT OF DEBTOR’S PERSONAL EARNINGS.

Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

#### A. C. Wicox v. K. B. Company.

Decided, January 16, 1905.

*Attachment*— Constitutional *Law*— Law *Permitting Attachment of Personal Earnings Constitutional.*

The law permitting the attachment of 10 per cent, of a debtor’s personal earnings, where a claim is for necessaries, does not create a favored class and is constitutional.

*A. V. Taylor,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. P. Dunlap,*contra.

Winch, J.; Hale, J., and Marvin, J., concur.

Defendant in error having brought an action before a justice of the peace against plaintiff in error, to recover for necessaries, an order of attachment was issued and thereupon the defendant in said action moved to discharge the attachment. This motion being overruled an appeal was taken to the common pleas court where the motion was again overruled, to which ruling plaintiff in error excepted and brought the matter *here*on error.

But two reasons were urged at the hearing in this court, why the judgment of the common pleas court, should be reversed.

*453
      *First.*That the order of attachment herein is void for want of due execution and return. . That the return of the constable on the order of attachment is not according to law, is apparent, but the garnishee had actual notice and answered. We think this cures the informality in service.

*Second.*That the statutes under which the attachment proceeding was brought are unconstitutional, in making the mere fact that the claim on which judgment is sought is for necessaries a ground of attachment, and in such cases exempting only ninety per cent, of the debtor’s personal earnings, while in other cases all his earnings for the three months are exempt, if required for the support of the debtor’s family.

It is said that these provisions with regard to actions for necessaries create a favored class, who alone may take advantage of the statute, namely, those who furnish necessaries.

We do not think so. The Legislature has seen fit to define certain rights and remedies in a certain *class of cases;*it has not created *classes of persons upon*whom the laws operate without uniformity.

Believing such legislation is not inhibited by the Constitution, the judgment is affirmed.
TS-P999BH 

Chemical structure diagram 

Attachment 2 

Page 1/1 

 CBI
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C30

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

  

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 1.431(c)(6)-1 Mortality tables used to determine current liability. ( a ) *Mortality tables used to determine current liability.* In accordance with section 431(c)(6)(D), the mortality assumptions that apply to a single-employer defined benefit plan for the plan year pursuant to section 430(h)(3)(A) and (D) and §§ 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(1) and (a)(2)(ii) are used to determine a multiemployer plan's current liability for purposes of applying the rules of section 431(c)(6). For purposes of this paragraph (a), either the generational mortality tables used pursuant to § 1.430(h)(3)-1(b) or the static mortality tables used pursuant to § 1.430(h)(3)-1(c) are permitted to be used without regard to whether the plan is a small plan. However, substitute mortality tables under §§ 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2)(i) and 1.430(h)(3)-2 are not permitted to be used for purposes of this paragraph (a).
( b ) *Applicability date.* This section applies for valuation dates occurring on or after January 1, 2024.
[T.D. 9983, 88 FR 72366, Oct. 20, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3900 Posterior artificial tooth with a metal insert. ( a ) *Identification.* A posterior artificial tooth with a metal insert is a porcelain device with an insert made of austenitic alloys or alloys containing 75 percent or greater gold and metals of the platinum group intended to replace a natural tooth. The device is attached to surrounding teeth by a bridge and is intended to provide both an improvement in appearance and functional occlusion (bite).
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 63008, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38798, July 25, 2001]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



Exhibit 4.11  


 
  CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
  OF
  PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST II    
  


        THIS Certificate of Trust of Prudential Financial Capital Trust II (the "Trust") is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to
form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del.C. Section 3801 et
seq.) (the "Act"). 



        1.    Name:    The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is Prudential Financial Capital Trust II. 


        2.    Delaware Trustee:    The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, c/o JP Morgan Chase, Attention: Institutional Trust Services, 500 Stanton Christiana Road, OPS4 / 3rd Floor, Newark, Delaware 19713. 



        3.    Effective Date:    This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of
the State of Delaware. 


[Signature
page follows] 


1





 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act. 



	 	 	CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Delaware

Trustee
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ John J. Cashin
 Name: John J. Cashin

Title: Vice-President
	

 	
 	

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, as Property

Trustee
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ Craig Baumberger
 Name: Craig Baumberger

Title: Trust Officer
	

 	
 	

/s/ Richard Vaccaro
 Name: Richard Vaccaro

as Administrative Trustee
	

 	
 	

/s/ Scott Kaplan
 Name: Scott Kaplan

as Administrative Trustee
	

 	
 	

/s/ Jonathan Hunt
 Name: Jonathan Hunt

as Administrative Trustee




2









QuickLinks


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST II
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

April 22-23, 2010.

# TIME:

8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Empire Hotel, 44 W 63rd Street, New York, NY 10023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: March 4, 2010.

John K. Rabiej,

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-5073 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
§ 1.25-6T Form of qualified mortgage credit certificate (Temporary). ( a ) *In general.* Qualified mortgage credit certificates are to be issued on the form prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. If no form is prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service, or if the form prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service is not readily available, the issuer may use its own form provided that such form contains the information required by this section. Each mortgage credit certificate must be issued in a form such that there are at least three copies of the form. One copy of the certificate shall be retained by the issuer; one copy shall be retained by the lender; and one copy shall be forwarded to the State official who issued the certification required by § 1.25-4T(d), unless that State official has stated in writing that he does not want to receive such copies.
( b ) *Required information.* Each qualified mortgage credit certificate must include the following information: ( 1 ) The name, address, and TIN of the issuer,
( 2 ) The date of the issuer's election not to issue qualified mortgage bonds pursuant to which the certificate is being issued,
( 3 ) The number assigned to the certificate,
( 4 ) The name, address, and TIN of the holder of the certificate,
( 5 ) The certificate credit rate,
( 6 ) The certified indebtness amount,
( 7 ) The acquisition cost of the residence being acquired in connection with the certificate,
( 8 ) The average area purchase price applicable to the residence,
( 9 ) Whether the certificate meets the requirements of § 1.25-3T(d), relating to residence requirement,
( 10 ) Whether the certificate meets the requirements of § 1.25-3T(e), relating to 3-year requirement,
( 11 ) Whether the certificate meets the requirements of § 1.25-3T(g), relating to new mortgage requirement,
( 12 ) Whether the certificate meets the requirements of § 1.25-3T(i), relating to prohibited mortgages,
( 13 ) Whether the certificate meets the requirements of § 1.25-3T(j), relating to particular lenders,
( 14 ) Whether the certificate meets the requirements of § 1.25-3T(k), relating to allocations to particular developments,
( 15 ) Whether the certificate meets the requirements of § 1.25-3T(n), relating to interest paid to related persons,
( 16 ) Whether the residence in connection with which the certificate is issued is a targeted area residence,
( 17 ) The date on which a closing agreement is signed with respect to the certified indebtness amount,
( 18 ) The expiration date of the certificate,
( 19 ) A statement that the certificate is not transferable or a statement that the certificate may be transferred only if the issuer issues a new certificate, and
( 20 ) A statement, signed under penalties of perjury by an authorized official of the issuer or its agent, that such person has made the determinations specified in paragraph (b) (9) through (16).
[T.D. 8023, 50 FR 19354, May 8, 1985]