alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| · | Servicing Criterion 1122(d)(1)(iii) is applicable only with respect to the Company’s continuing obligation to act as, or locate a, successor servicer under the                circumstances referred to in certain transaction agreements. It is management’s interpretation that the Company has no other active back-up servicing responsibilities in regards to Servicing Criterion 1122(d)(1)(iii) as of and for the year                ended December 31, 2018. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | Servicing Criterion 1122(d)(1)(v) is applicable only to the activities the Company performs related to the mathematically accurate aggregation of information received                from servicers and the accurate conveyance of such information within reports to investors. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | Servicing Criterion 1122(d)(4)(iii) is applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform only as it relates to the Company’s obligation to                report additions, removals or substitutions on reports to investors in accordance with the transaction agreements. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Principal
Plus Fund L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  	/s/Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		  Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	  Chief Financial Officer

Date:		  August 14, 2003
# C_2017053EN.01000401.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2016 — European Commission v World Duty Free Group SA, formerly Autogrill España SA (C-20/15 P), Banco Santander SA, Santusa Holding SL (C-21/15 P)

(Joined Cases C-20/15 P and C-21/15 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Tax system - Corporation tax - Deduction - Amortisation of goodwill resulting from acquisitions by undertakings resident for tax purposes in Spain of shareholdings of at least 5 % in undertakings resident for tax purposes outside Spain - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Condition relating to selectivity))

(2017/C 053/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: World Duty Free Group SA, formerly Autogrill España SA (C-20/15 P), Banco Santander SA, Santusa Holding SL (C-21/15 P) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro and R. Calvo Salinero, abogados)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Interveners in support of the defendants: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and K. Petersen, acting as Agents) Ireland (represented by: G. Hodge and E. Creedon, acting as Agents, and by B. Doherty, Barrister, and A. Goodman, Barrister), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M.A. Sampol Pucurull, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgments of the General Court of the European Union of 7 November 2014, Autogrill España v Commission (T-219/10, EU:T:2014:939), and of 7 November 2014, Banco Santander and Santusa v Commission (T-399/11, EU:T:2014:938); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgments of the General Court of the European Union of 7 November 2014, Autogrill España v Commission (T-219/10, EU:T:2014:939), and of 7 November 2014, Banco Santander and Santusa v Commission (T-399/11, EU:T:2014:938);

Autogrill España

| 2. | Refers the cases back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the cases back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs;

| 4. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.

1

---
#### § 1.274-6 Expenditures deductible without regard to trade or business or other income producing activity.

The provisions of §§ 1.274-1 through 1.274-5, inclusive, do not apply to any deduction allowable to the taxpayer without regard to its connection with the taxpayer's trade or business or other income producing activity. Examples of such items are interest, taxes such as real property taxes, and casualty losses. Thus, if a taxpayer owned a fishing camp, the taxpayer could still deduct mortgage interest and real property taxes in full even if deductions for its use are not allowable under section 274(a) and § 1.274-2. In the case of a taxpayer which is not an individual, the provisions of this section shall be applied as if it were an individual. Thus, if a corporation sustains a casualty loss on an entertainment facility used in its trade or business, it could deduct the loss even though deductions for the use of the facility are not allowable.

[T.D. 8051, 50 FR 36576, Sept. 9, 1985]
§ 1.401(a)(26)-7 Testing methods. ( a ) *Testing on each day of the plan year.* A plan satisfies section 401(a)(26) for a plan year only if the plan satisfies section 401(a)(26) on each day of the plan year. An employee benefits on a day if the employee is a participant for such day and the employee benefits under the plan for the year under the rules in § 1.401(a)(26)-5.
( b ) *Simplified testing method.* A plan is treated as satisfying the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section if it satisfies section 401(a)(26) on any single plan day during the plan year, but only if that day is reasonably representative of the employer's workforce and the plan's coverage. A plan does not have to be tested on the same day each plan year.
( c ) *Retroactive correction.* If a plan fails to satisfy section 401(a)(26) for a plan year, the plan may be retroactively amended during the same period and under the same conditions as provided for in § 1.401(a)(4)-11(g)(3) through (g)(5) to satisfy section 401(a)(26). A plan merger that occurs by the end of the period provided in § l.401(a)(4)-11(g)(3)(iv) is treated solely for purposes of section 401(a)(26) as if it were effective as of the first day of the plan year. The rule of this paragraph (c) may be illustrated by the following example.
Example. Assume that an employer with 500 employees maintains two defined contribution plans. Plan A benefits 45 employees. Plan B benefits 50 employees. Immediately before the end of the period provided for in § 1.401(a)(4)-11(g)(3)(iv), the employer expands coverage under Plan A to benefit 20 more employees retroactively for the plan year. Thus, Plan A satisfies paragraph (a) of this section for the plan year. Alternatively, before the end of the period provided for in § 1.401(a)(4)-11(g)(3)(iv), or later if a later period is applicable under section 401(b), the employer could merge Plan A with Plan B to satisfy section 401(a)(26).
[T.D. 8375, 56 FR 63418, Dec. 4, 1991]
**Exhibit
      32.01**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**REQUIRED
      BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)**


**AND
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**


**OF
      2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
      31,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Patrick W. Cavanagh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      PATRICK W. CAVANAGH


Patrick
      W. Cavanagh


Chief
      Executive Officer


Williams
      Controls, Inc.


May
      11,
      2007
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1155 Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system. ( a ) *Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system intended for the early detection of pregnancy* — ( 1 ) *Identification.* A human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for the early detection of pregnancy is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine.
( 2 ) *Classification.* Class II.
( b ) *Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test system intended for any uses other than early detection of pregnancy* — ( 1 ) *Identification.* A human chorionic goadotropin (HCG) test system is a device intended for any uses other than early detection of pregnancy (such as an aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of treatment of persons with certain tumors or carcinomas) is intended to measure HCG, a placental hormone, in plasma or urine.
( 2 ) *Classification.* Class III.
( 3 ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* As of the enactment date of the amendments, May 28, 1976, an approval under section 515 of the act is required before the device described in paragraph (b)(1) may be commercially distributed. See § 862.3.
WILLIE EDWARD DOZIER , Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0799

Opinion filed May 16, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Willie Edward Dozier, pro se , Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.
The petition f or belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated
appeal from the August 18, 2015, Order Denying Defendant’s Amended/Supplemental
Motion for Postconviction Relief in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16

- 2008

-2 CF

- 14339

- AXXX

- MA. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion
shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).
WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.5725 Infusion pump. ( a ) *Identification.* An infusion pump is a device used in a health care facility to pump fluids into a patient in a controlled manner. The device may use a piston pump, a roller pump, or a peristaltic pump and may be powered electrically or mechanically. The device may also operate using a constant force to propel the fluid through a narrow tube which determines the flow rate. The device may include means to detect a fault condition, such as air in, or blockage of, the infusion line and to activate an alarm.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
#### West Haven Housing Authority *v.*Rector Simmons, Jr., et al.

Submitted March 29

decided June 25, 1968

*Francis X. Dineen,*in support of the petition.

*Dennis J. Donahue, Jr.,*in opposition.

The petition by the defendants for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
#### Suburban Development Corporation *v.*Town Council of the Town of West Hartford

*Samuel S. Goldstein,*town counsel, for the appellant (defendant).

*Michael E. Grossmann,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

Argued December 3

decided December 3, 1968

The motion by the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted unless the defendant files its brief on or before December 19,1968.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jay N. Torok, certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report of Great Western Land and Recreation,
Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report; (4) The registrants other certifying offices and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the
quarterly report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and(c)
    
    Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; (5) The registrants other certifying offices and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls (a
pre-existing term relating to internal controls regarding financial reporting) which
could adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the companys auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal controls; and (6) The registrants other certifying offices and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: July 25, 2005 /s/ Jay N. Torok
Jay N. Torok
Chairman of the Board and
Principal Executivel Officer
Great Western Land and Recreation, Inc.
AMENDMENT #4 TO 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



 



Exhibit 10.11 (e)


AMENDMENT FOUR

TO THE

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



     This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Charter Communications Inc. 2001
Stock Incentive Plan, as amended through the date hereof (the “Plan”), is dated
as of October 29, 2002.


Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to replace the first sentence thereof
with the following sentence:



	 	 	 	The maximum number of Shares that may be made the subject of Options and
Awards granted under the Plan is 68,895,911 plus up to 21,068,102 Shares
based on forfeitures, cancellations and terminations under Charter
Communications Option Plan; provided, however, that in the aggregate, not
more than 3,000,000 of the number of allotted Shares may be made the
subject of Restricted Stock Awards under Section 10 of the Plan (other
than shares of Restricted Stock made in settlement of Performance Units
pursuant to Section 11.1(b).



     The terms of the Plan (including the remainder of Section 4.1) shall
remain in full force and effect without modification or amendment except as
expressly set forth herein.
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1820 Pneumoencephalographic chair. ( a ) *Identification.* A pneumoencephalographic chair is a chair intended to support and position a patient during pneumoencephalography (x-ray imaging of the brain).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 84 FR 71819, Dec. 30, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Part 886

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

#### § 886.5933 [Reserved]
§ 1.1402(c)-7 Members of religious groups opposed to insurance. The performance of service by an individual: ( a ) Who is a member of a recognized religious sect or division thereof, and
( b ) Who is an adherent of established tenets or teachings of such sect or division by reason of which he is conscientiously opposed to acceptance of the benefits of any private or public insurance which makes payments in the event of death, disability, old age, or retirement or makes payments toward the cost of, or provides services for, medical care (including the benefits of any insurance system established by the Social Security Act),
during any taxable year for which he is granted a tax exemption, pursuant to section 1402(h), does not constitute a trade or business within the meaning of section 1402(c) and § 1.1402(c)-1. See also §§ 1.1402(h) and 1.1402(h)-1. [T.D. 6993, 34 FR 830, Jan. 18, 1969]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# Date and Time:

Friday, August 7, 2009; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

# Place:

624 9th St., NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

## Meeting Agenda

This meeting is open to the public.

I. Approval of Agenda.

II. Approval of Minutes of July 10, 2009 Meeting.

III. Announcements.

IV. Management and Operations.
      - Scheduling of Monthly Teleconferences

V. Program Planning.
      - Approval of 2009 Statutory Report
      - Approval of Concept Paper for 2010 Statutory Report Topic
      - Consideration of a Follow-up Letter to the Department of Justice Regarding Dismissal of Voter Intimidation Charges from an Incident in Philadelphia During the 2008 Election
      - Consideration of a Letter to the President Regarding Racial and Gender Preferences in Proposed Health Care Legislation
      - Update on Status of Document Request to Government Agencies Regarding their Civil Rights Enforcement Activities
      - Update on Possible Commission Public Service Announcements

VI. Adjourn.

# Contact Person for Further Information:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit,  (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-8116.

Dated: July 27, 2009.

David Blackwood,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E9-18222 Filed 7-27-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P