alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.150-4 Change in use of facilities financed with tax-exempt private activity bonds. ( a ) *Scope.* This section applies for purposes of the rules for change of use of facilities financed with private activity bonds under sections 150(b)(3) (relating to qualified 501(c)(3) bonds), 150(b)(4) (relating to certain exempt facility bonds and small issue bonds), 150(b)(5) (relating to facilities required to be owned by governmental units or 501(c)(3) organizations), and 150(c).
( b ) *Effect of remedial actions* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in this section, the change of use provisions of sections 150(b) (3) through (5), and 150(c) apply even if the issuer takes a remedial action described in §§ 1.142-2, 1.144-2, or 1.145-2.
( 2 ) *Exceptions* — ( i ) *Redemption.* If nonqualified bonds are redeemed within 90 days of a deliberate action under § 1.145-2(a) or within 90 days of the date on which a failure to properly use proceeds occurs under § 1.142-2 or § 1.144-2, sections 150(b) (3) through (5) do not apply during the period between that date and the date on which the nonqualified bonds are redeemed.
( ii ) *Alternative qualifying use of facility.* If a bond-financed facility is used for an alternative qualifying use under §§ 1.145-2 and 1.141-12(f), sections 150(b) (3) and (5) do not apply because of the alternative use.
( iii ) *Alternative use of disposition proceeds.* If disposition proceeds are used for a qualifying purpose under §§ 1.145-2 and 1.141-12(e), 1.142-2(c)(4), or 1.144-2, sections 150(b) (3) through (5) do not apply because of the deliberate action that gave rise to the disposition proceeds after the date on which all of the disposition proceeds have been expended on the qualifying purpose. If all of the disposition proceeds are so expended within 90 days of the date of the deliberate action, however, sections 150(b) (3) through (5) do not apply because of the deliberate action.
( c ) *Allocation rules* — ( 1 ) *In general.* If a change in use of a portion of the property financed with an issue of qualified private activity bonds causes section 150 (b)(3), (b)(4), or (b)(5) to apply to an issue, the bonds of the issue allocable to that portion under section 150(c)(3) are the same as the nonqualified bonds determined for purposes of §§ 1.142-1, 1.144-1, and 1.145-1, except that bonds allocable to all common areas are also allocated to that portion.
( 2 ) *Special rule when remedial action is taken.* If an issuer takes a remedial action with respect to an issue of private activity bonds under §§ 1.142-2, 1.144-2, or 1.145-2, the bonds of the issue allocable to a portion of property are the same as the nonqualified bonds determined for purposes of those sections.
( d ) *Effective dates.* For effective dates of this section, see § 1.141-16.
[T.D. 8712, 62 FR 2304, Jan. 16, 1997]
exv10w1



 


EXHIBIT 10.1



[LETTERHEAD OF BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRES]



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



As independent auditors, we hereby consent to the
use of our report on the consolidated balance sheets of TotalFinaElf
and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and changes
in shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule, all expressed in euros, dated
February 20, 2003, and all
references to our Firm included in TotalFinaElf’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and
we hereby further consent to the incorporation by reference of such
reports into:




	 	(i)	 	The Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 on Form F-3 to Form F-4 Registration Statement
(File no. 333-10154) for TotalFinaElf, filed with the SEC on
September 8, 2000;
	 
	 	(ii)	 	The Form S-8 Registration
Statement (File no. 333-13024) for TotalFinaElf, filed with the
SEC on December 27, 2000; and
	 
	 	(iii)	 	The Form S-8 Registration
Statement (File no. 333-13214) for TotalFinaElf, filed with the
SEC on February 28, 2001.
	 
	 	(iv)	 	The Form S-8 Registration
Statement (File no. 333-103815) for TotalFinaElf, filed with the SEC
on March 14, 2003.
	 
	 






	 	 
	 	
/s/   BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRES
	 	

	 	
BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRES

(Ernst & Young Network)




 




Paris France

April 2, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5060 Conditioning tool for eating disorders. ( a ) *Identification.* A conditioning tool for eating disorders is a prescription device that non-invasively measures the mass of food eaten during a meal and provides feedback in the form of eating rate, patient satiety, and eating pattern information to the patient.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Nonclinical performance testing must demonstrate: ( i ) Device measurement accuracy and repeatability; and
( ii ) Device feedback accuracy.
( 2 ) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
( 3 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 4 ) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and electrical safety of the device.
( 5 ) Labeling and patient labeling must be provided which includes the following: ( i ) Information identifying and explaining how to use the device and its components; and
( ii ) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment.
[86 FR 68403, Dec. 2, 2021]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Magone Project final environmentalimpact statement, Grant County, Oregon
 
Magone Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS)
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.92:M 27/V.1 | A 13.92:M 27/APP. A-E
Item Number:0080-F (online)
CGP System Number:001017104
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 29, 2017********
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

25–215 WASHINGTON : 2017

115th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–21 

PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE ECOSYSTEM 

RESTORATION FINAL FEASIBILITY REPORT AND EIS 

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, 

CIVIL WORKS, THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

TRANSMITTING

THE CORPS’ PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FINAL FEASIBILITY REPORT AND EIS REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2016 

MARCH 22, 2017.—Referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure and ordered to be printed 

02:19 Apr 28 2017 Jkt 025215 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD021PL XXX HD021PL

(III)
,9
9
9,
9,,
9,,,
,;
;
;,
;,,
;,,,
;,9
;9
;9,
;9,,
;9,,,
;,;
;;
;;,
;;,,
;;,,,
;;,9
;;9
;;9,
;;9,,
;;9,,,
;;,;
;;;
(1)



























































































































































































































































































































317




























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
§ 1.167(b)-0 Methods of computing depreciation. ( a ) *In general.* Any reasonable and consistently applied method of computing depreciation may be used or continued in use under section 167. Regardless of the method used in computing depreciation, deductions for depreciation shall not exceed such amounts as may be necessary to recover the unrecovered cost or other basis less salvage during the remaining useful life of the property. The reasonableness of any claim for depreciation shall be determined upon the basis of conditions known to exist at the end of the period for which the return is made. It is the responsibility of the taxpayer to establish the reasonableness of the deduction for depreciation claimed. Generally, depreciation deductions so claimed will be changed only where there is a clear and convincing basis for a change.
( b ) *Certain methods.* Methods previously found adequate to produce a reasonable allowance under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 or prior revenue laws will, if used consistently by the taxpayer, continue to be acceptable under section 167(a). Examples of such methods which continue to be acceptable are the straight line method, the declining balance method with the rate limited to 150 percent of the applicable straight line rate, and under appropriate circumstances, the unit of production method. The methods described in section 167(b) and §§ 1.167(b)-1, 1.167(b)-2, 1.167(b)-3, and 1.167(b)-4 shall be deemed to produce a reasonable allowance for depreciation except as limited under section 167(c) and § 1.167(c)-1. See also § 1.167(e)-1 for rules relating to change in method of computing depreciation.
( c ) *Application of methods.* In the case of item accounts, any method which results in a reasonable allowance for depreciation may be selected for each item of property, but such method must thereafter be applied consistently to that particular item. In the case of group, classified, or composite accounts, any method may be selected for each account. Such method must be applied to that particular account consistently thereafter but need not necessarily be applied to acquisitions of similar property in the same or subsequent years, provided such acquisitions are set up in separate accounts. See, however, § 1.167(e)-1 and section 446 and the regulations thereunder, for rules relating to changes in the method of computing depreciation, and § 1.167(c)-1 for restriction on the use of certain methods. See also § 1.167(a)-7 for definition of account.
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.2675 Oscillometer. ( a ) *Identification.* An oscillometer is a device used to measure physiological oscillations of any kind, e.g., changes in the volume of arteries.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
[45 FR 7907, Feb. 5, 1980, as amended at 84 FR 71812, Dec. 30, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.4600 Leukotome. ( a ) *Identification.* A leukotome is a device used to cut sections out of the brain.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 882.9.
[44 FR 51730, Sept. 4, 1979, as amended at 59 FR 63012, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38808, July 25, 2001]
EXHIBIT 10.1


The Employment Agreement, as amended and restated, by and between New York
Community Bancorp, Inc. (formerly known as "Queens County Bancorp, Inc.") and
Joseph R. Ficalora was filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 and is incorporated, in its entirety, by
reference herein. Such Employment Agreement is substantially identical in all
material respects (except as otherwise noted below) with the other contracts
listed below which are not being filed as separate exhibits to this Report.

Parties to Employment Agreement

New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (formerly known as "Queens County Bancorp,
Inc.") and Robert Wann (1)

New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (formerly known as "Queens County Bancorp,
Inc.") and James O'Donovan (2)

(1)   Mr. Wann's Employment Agreement with New York Community Bancorp, Inc. is
      substantially identical to Exhibit 10.1 except as to (i) the name of the
      signatory, which is Robert Wann; (ii) the position in Section 1 of the
      Employment Agreement, which is Senior Vice President, Comptroller and
      Chief Financial Officer); and (iii) the amount of the base salary in
      Section 3(a), which is not less than $225,500 per year.

(2)   Mr. O'Donovan's Employment Agreement with New York Community Bancorp, Inc.
      is substantially identical to Exhibit 10.1 except as to (i) the name of
      the signatory, which is James O'Donovan; (ii) the position in Section 1 of
      the Employment Agreement, which is Senior Vice President; and (iii) the
      amount of the base salary in Section 3(a), which is not less than
      $269,000.
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.6010 Abrasive device and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* An abrasive device and accessories is a device constructed of various abrasives, such as diamond chips, that are glued to shellac-based paper. The device is intended to remove excessive restorative materials, such as gold, and to smooth rough surfaces from oral restorations, such as crowns. The device is attached to a shank that is held by a handpiece. The device includes the abrasive disk, guard for an abrasive disk, abrasive point, polishing agent strip, and polishing wheel.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9. If the device is not labeled or otherwise represented as sterile, it is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 13830, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38799, July 25, 2001]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Assistance Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer 
Income Tax Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 13, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, April 13, 2010, at 2 p.m. Eastern 
Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Donna Powers. For more information, please contact Ms. Powers at 
1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine 
Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or contact us at the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 3, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-4893 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
(logo) CWCapital

ASSET MANAGEMENT

 

**Annual Statement as to Compliance**

**For the Period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018**

** **

** **

**COMM 2015-CCRE26**

 

 

In accordance with Item 1123 ofRegulation AB and with the requirements detailed in §10.11 of the Pooling andServicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, (the“CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity asSpecial Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to thefollowing:

 

(A)               a review of CWCAM’s activities during thepreceding calendar year or portion thereof (the “Reporting Period”) and ofCWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’ssupervision; and

 

(B)               that, to the best of such officer’sknowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations underthe Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Should you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

 

 

/s/ James P. Shevlin

James P. Shevlin

President/Chief OperatingOfficer

 

 

7501 Wisconsin Avenue | Suite500 West | Bethesda, MD | 20814
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIX GUILLEN GONZALEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72831

Agency No. A070-967-208

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Felix Guillen Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an

immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal,

and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

JUN 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72831

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s factual

findings and will uphold the BIA’s decision unless the evidence compels a

contrary conclusion. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992). We

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of asylum and withholding of

removal because Gonzalez failed to establish that he was harmed or is at risk of

being harmed on account of any protected ground. See Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. at

483-84. 

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because

Gonzalez failed to demonstrate that he would be tortured by or with the

acquiescence of the Guatemalan government. See Zheng v. Ashcroft, 332 F.3d

1186, 1194 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,762]


Chrysler, LLC, Sterling Heights Assembly Plant, Including On-Site 
Leased Workers from Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC; Sterling 
Heights, MI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on April 27, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Chrysler, LLC, Sterling heights Assembly Plant, Sterling Heights, 
Michigan. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 18, 
2009 (74 FR 23214).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers assemble the 
Chrysler Sebring, Chrysler Sebring Convertible and the Dodge Avenger.
    New information shows that workers leased from Caravan Knight 
Facilities Management LLC were employed on-site at the Sterling 
Heights, Michigan location of Chrysler, LLC, Sterling Heights Assembly 
Plant. The Department has determined that these workers were 
sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered 
leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Caravan Knight Facilities 
Management LLC working on-site at the Sterling Heights, Michigan 
location of Chrysler, LLC, Sterling Heights Assembly Plant.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-65,762 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Chrysler, LLC, Sterling Heights Assembly Plant, 
including on-site leased workers from Caravan Knight Facilities 
Management LLC, Sterling Heights, Michigan, who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after March 8, 2008, 
through April 27, 2011, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also 
eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under 
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2009.
 Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-18040 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P