Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules 54185 

Commenters may use PRC Form 61, 

which is available on the Commission’s 

Web site, http://www.prc.gov. 

§ 3025.20 The record on review. 

(a) The record on review includes: 

(1) The final determination; 

(2) The notices to persons served by 

the post office to be closed or 

consolidated; 

(3) The administrative record; 

(4) All documents submitted in the 

appeal proceeding; and 

(5) Facts of which the Commission 

can properly take official notice. 

(b) However, a petitioner or 

commenter may dispute factual matters 

or conclusions drawn in the 

administrative record. 

§ 3025.21 Filing of the administrative 

record. 

The Postal Service shall file the 

administrative record within 10 days of 

the date of posting of a Petition for 

Review on the Commission’s Web site. 

The Commission may alter this time for 

good cause. The Postal Service shall 

notify participants who do not file 

electronically of the filing of the 

administrative record. Such notification 

shall be made by First-Class Mail. 

§ 3025.22 Making documents available for 

inspection by the public. 

Copies of all filings (including the 

administrative record) related to an 

appeal shall be available for public 

inspection at the post office whose 

closure or consolidation is under 

review. If that post office has been 

suspended or closed, the filings shall be 

available at the nearest open post office. 

The Postal Service must notify all 

petitioners and commenters of the 

location(s) (other than the Commission 

offices) where the filings may be 

inspected. Such notification shall be 

made by First-Class Mail. 

§ 3025.30 Suspension pending review. 

A final determination to close or 

consolidate a post office is suspended 

until final disposition by the 

Commission when a person files a 

timely Petition for Review. 

§ 3025.40 Participant statement. 

(a) When a timely Petition for Review 

of a decision to close or consolidate a 

post office is filed, the Secretary shall 

furnish petitioner with a copy of PRC 

Form 61. This form is designed to 

inform petitioners on how to make a 

statement of his/her arguments in 

support of the petition. 

(b) The instructions for Form 61 shall 

provide: 

(1) A concise explanation of the 

purpose of the form; 

(2) A copy of section 404(d)(2)(A) of 

title 39, U.S. Code; and 

(3) Notification that, if petitioner 

prefers, he or she may file a brief in lieu 

of or in addition to completing PRC 

Form 61. 

§ 3025.41 Due date for participant 

statement. 

The statement or brief of petitioner 

and of any other participant supporting 

petitioner shall be filed not more than 

20 days after the filing of the 

administrative record. 

§ 3025.42 Due date for Postal Service 

response. 

The statement or brief of the Postal 

Service and of any other participant 

supporting the Postal Service shall be 

filed not more than 14 days after the 

date for filing of petitioner’s statement. 

§ 3025.43 Due date for replies to the Postal 

Service. 

Petitioner and any other participant 

supporting petitioner may file a reply to 

the Postal Service response not more 

than 7 days after the date of the Postal 

Service response. Replies are limited to 

issues discussed in the Postal Service’s 

response. 

[FR Doc. 2011–22009 Filed 8–30–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0702; FRL–8886–2] 

Fenamiphos; Proposed Data Call-In 

Order for Pesticide Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed order. 

SUMMARY: This document proposes to 

require the submission of various data 

required to support the continuation of 

the tolerances for the pesticide 

fenamiphos. Pesticide tolerances are 

established under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 31, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0702, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011– 

0702. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the docket 

without change and may be made 

available on-line at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through regulations.gov or email. The regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the docket and made available 

on the Internet. If you submit an 

electronic comment, EPA recommends 

that you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the docket index available 

at http://www.regulations.gov. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either in the 

electronic docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
54186 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

hours of operation of this Docket 

Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The Docket Facility telephone 

number is (703) 305–5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

Miederhoff, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 347–8028; e-mail address: 

miederhoff.eric@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. FFDCA Data Call-In Authority 

In this document, EPA proposes to 

issue an order requiring the submission 

of various data to support the 

continuation of the fenamiphos 

tolerances at 40 CFR 180.349. Under 

section 408(f) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 

346a(f), EPA is authorized to require, by 

order, submission of data ‘‘reasonably 

required to support the continuation of 

a tolerance’’ when such data cannot be 

obtained under the Data Call-In 

authority of section 3(c)(2)(B) of the 

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and 

Rodenticide Act (‘‘FIFRA’’), 7 U.S.C. 

136a(c)(2)(B), or section 4 of the Toxic 

Substances Control Act (‘‘TSCA’’), 15 

U.S.C. 2603. A section 408(f) Data CallIn order may only be issued following 

notice and a comment period of not less 

than 60 days. 

A section 408(f) Data Call-In order 

must contain the following elements: 

• A requirement that one or more 

persons submit to EPA a notice 

identifying the person(s) who commit(s) 

to submit the data required in the order; 

• A description of the required data 

and the required reports connected to 

such data; 

• An explanation of why the required 

data could not be obtained under 

section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA or section 4 

of TSCA; and 

• The required submission date for 

the notice identifying one or more 

interested persons who commit to 

submit the required data and the 

required submission dates for all the 

data and reports required in the order. 

(21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)). 

EPA may by order modify or revoke 

the affected tolerances if any one of the 

following submissions is not made in a 

timely manner: 

• A notice identifying the one or 

more interested persons who commit to 

submit the data; 

• The data itself; or 

• The reports required under a 

section 408(f) order are not submitted by 

the date specified in the order. (21 

U.S.C. 346a(f)(2)). 

III. Regulatory Background for 

Fenamiphos 

Fenamiphos is an organophosphate 

nematicide/insecticide. It is not 

currently registered under FIFRA. 

Fenamiphos’ last FIFRA registration was 

canceled in 2007. However, four FFDCA 

tolerances remain for residues of 

fenamiphos on the following 

commodities: Pineapples, grapes, 

raisins, and bananas (40 CFR 180.349). 

Since there are currently no domestic 

registrations for fenamiphos, these 

tolerances are referred to as ‘‘import 

tolerances.’’ 

Fenamiphos is a member of a family 

of pesticides known as the 

organophosphates. EPA has concluded 

fenamiphos and other organophosphate 

pesticides share a common mechanism 

of toxicity. As with other 

organophosphates, the principal toxic 

effects induced by fenamiphos are 

related to its cholinesterase-inhibiting 

activity. In animal laboratory studies, it 

produces the associated clinical signs 

such as tremors, unsteady gait, 

decreased activity, salivation, and 

disturbed balance in rats and rabbits, 

and decreased cholinesterase activity 

(plasma, brain) in rats and rabbits 

following acute, subchronic, and 

chronic oral exposure. 

In February 2002, EPA issued an 

Interim Reregistration Eligibility 

Decision (IRED) for fenamiphos. The 

IRED evaluated the potential human 

health and ecological risks associated 

with all registered uses of fenamiphos. 

In connection with its obligation under 

the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 

(FQPA), the Agency also evaluated 

whether all fenamiphos tolerances in 

existence at the time of the passage of 

FQPA met the revised safety standard 

that the FQPA adopted for FFDCA 

section 408. In the IRED, EPA 

concluded that the risks of fenamiphos 

when evaluated in isolation from other 

organophosphates met the revised safety 

standard in FFDCA section 408. This 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules 54187 

conclusion was labeled ‘‘interim,’’ 

however, because EPA had not yet 

completed a cumulative risk assessment 

for the organophosphates. In July 2006, 

EPA completed its cumulative risk 

assessment for the organophosphate 

pesticides finding that these tolerances 

met the revised safety standard. 

In June 2010, in response to a 

registrant’s interest in supporting 

tolerances for import purposes, the 

Agency completed a revised human 

health risk assessment for fenamiphos. 

As there are no domestic registrations 

for fenamiphos products, the assessment 

was limited to an evaluation of the 

potential dietary risk from exposure to 

fenamiphos residues in imported food 

commodities. This assessment utilized 

updated risk assessment methodologies 

from those that were used for the IRED’s 

dietary assessment. The 2010 

assessment concluded that potential 

exposure to fenamiphos residues in or 

on imported food commodities exceeds 

the Agency’s level of concern. 

The 2010 assessment identified 

several studies that were needed to 

verify the accuracy of the assumptions 

used in the Agency’s evaluation of 

dietary exposure to imported 

commodities treated with fenamiphos or 

that were needed to meet a new data 

requirement. The necessary data 

include: A comparative chlolinesterase 

assay, residue data for grape, and an 

immunotoxicity study. These data 

requirements are discussed in detail in 

Unit IV. 

Under section 3(g) of FIFRA and 

implementing regulations, EPA has 

established a review program for 

pesticides registered under FIFRA. The 

goal of that program is for there to be a 

periodic review of pesticide 

registrations every 15 years to ensure 

that the registrations satisfy FIFRA 

standards and are based on ‘‘current 

scientific and other knowledge 

regarding the pesticide.’’ (40 CFR 

155.40(a)). EPA is in the preliminary 

stages of the registration review process 

for organophosphate pesticides. 

Although fenamiphos is not registered 

under FIFRA, EPA will be reexamining 

fenamiphos with the other registered 

organophosphates because of the 

organophosphates’ shared mechanism of 

toxicity. 

IV. Data Requirements 

A. Required Data and Reports 

Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f), 

EPA has determined that additional data 

are reasonably required to support the 

continuation of the import tolerances for 

fenamiphos which are codified at 40 

CFR 180.349. These data cannot be 

obtained under FIFRA section 3(c)(2)(B) 

because fenamiphos is not registered 

under FIFRA, and the data call-in 

authority under that section only 

extends to registered pesticides. These 

data cannot be obtained under TSCA 

because pesticides are excluded from 

coverage under that statute. 15 U.S.C. 

2602(2)(B)(ii). 

Accordingly, EPA proposes to issue a 

final order requiring the submission of 

the following data: 

1. Comparative Cholinesterase Assay 

(870.6300). A protocol and a final report 

are required. 

Rationale: As an organophosphate 

pesticide (OP), inhibition of 

acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is the 

critical effect for use in human health 

risk assessment. Many OPs were subject 

to a Data Call-In for the developmental 

neurotoxicity study (DNT). This Data 

Call-In also included the requirement 

for AChE inhibition data to evaluate 

comparative sensitivity in juvenile and 

adult rats. These data are most often 

collected in a study called the 

comparative cholinesterase assay (CCA). 

Since that time, CCA studies for more 

than 20 OPs have been submitted. 

Although for some OPs no difference in 

sensitivity has been observed in juvenile 

and adult animals, for many of the OPs, 

juveniles have been shown to be more 

sensitive. At this time, OPP has 

determined that a CCA is required for 

fenamiphos to evaluate the potential for 

increased sensitivity in juvenile animals 

compared with that of adult animals. 

Given that the AChE data provided in 

the CCAs have provided more sensitive 

results than DNT studies for the OPs, a 

DNT study for fenamiphos is not 

required at this time. 

2. Immunotoxicity study (870.7800). A 

final report and protocol are required. 

Rationale: This is a new data 

requirement under 40 CFR part 158 as 

a part of the data requirements for 

registration of a pesticide (food and nonfood uses) and for establishment of a 

tolerance. 

The Immunotoxicity Test Guideline 

(OPPTS 870.7800) prescribes functional 

immunotoxicity testing and is designed 

to evaluate the potential of a repeated 

chemical exposure to produce adverse 

effects (i.e., suppression) on the immune 

system. Immunosuppression is a deficit 

in the ability of the immune system to 

respond to a challenge of bacterial or 

viral infections such as tuberculosis 

(TB), Severe Acquired Respiratory 

Syndrome (SARS), or neoplasia. An 

immunotoxicity study for fenamiphos 

has not been submitted. 

3. Crop field trials—grapes 

(860.1500). A final report is required. 

Rationale: Field trials are required for 

each commodity/commodity group 

under 40 CFR part 158. These data are 

used to establish the legal maximum 

residue that may remain on food and to 

assess the risk posed by the pesticide 

residue. While residue data for 

fenamiphos use on grape is adequate to 

support several application methods, 

the Agency has not received data to 

support the current foliar use of 

fenamiphos on grape in Mexico. 

EPA guidelines recommend that crop 

field trials be designed to take into 

account where the crop is grown and 

how much of the crop is grown. Field 

trials are required for each type of 

formulation because the formulation can 

have a significant effect on the 

magnitude of the pesticide residue left 

on the crop. Residue trials also need to 

represent the maximum application rate 

on the label and have a geographic 

distribution representative of the 

commodity/commodity group. On June 

1, 2000 (65 FR 35069) (FRL–6559–3), 

EPA published in the Federal Register 

a Notice which provided detailed 

guidance on applying current U.S. data 

requirements for the establishment or 

continuance of tolerances for pesticide 

residues in or on imported foods. A 

copy of that Notice is available in the 

docket of this proposed order. That 

Notice contains instructions for 

determining the number and location of 

field trials. 

B. Persons Who Commit To Submit the 

Required Data 

After the 60-day comment period 

closes, the Agency will respond to 

comments, if appropriate, and may issue 

a final order requiring the submission of 

various data for fenamiphos in the 

Federal Register. If EPA issues such an 

order, persons who are interested in the 

continuation of the fenamiphos 

tolerances must notify the Agency by 

completing and submitting the required 

‘‘Section 408(f) Order Response’’ form 

(available in the docket) within 90 days 

after publication of the final Order in 

the Federal Register. 

The ‘‘Section 408(f) Order Response 

Form’’ requires the identification of 

persons who will submit the required 

data and lists the options available to 

support the required data: 

1. Develop new data. 

2. Submit an existing study—submit 

existing data not submitted previously 

to the Agency by anyone. 

3. Upgrade a study—submit or cite 

data to upgrade a study classified by 

EPA as partially acceptable and 

upgradable. 

4. Cite an existing study—cite an 

existing study that EPA classified as 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
54188 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 169 / Wednesday, August 31, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

acceptable or an existing study that has 

been submitted but not reviewed by the 

Agency. 

C. Required Dates for Submission of 

Data/Reports 

The following table lists the time 

allocated for both the completion and 

submission of each study. The required 

submission date is calculated from the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of the final order. 

Guideline requirement No. Study title Timeframe for protocol submission Timeframe for data 

submission 

870.6300 ............................................... Comparative Cholinesterase Assay .... 6 months .............................................. 12 months. 

870.7800 ............................................... Immunotoxicity Study ........................... 6 months .............................................. 12 months. 

860.1500 ............................................... Crop Field Trials (grapes) .................... Not Required ........................................ 24 months. 

D. Failure To Submit 

If the Agency does not receive a 

Section 408(f) Response Form 

identifying a person who agrees to 

submit the required data within 90 days 

after publication of the final order in the 

Federal Register, EPA will proceed to 

revoke the fenamiphos tolerances at 40 

CFR 180.349. Such revocation order is 

subject to the objection and hearing 

procedures in FFDCA section 408(g)(2), 

but the only material issue in such a 

procedure is whether a submission 

required by the order was made in a 

timely fashion. 

Additional events that may be the 

basis for modification or revocation of 

fenamiphos tolerances include, but are 

not limited to, the following: 

1. No person submits on the required 

schedule an acceptable proposal or final 

protocol when such is required to be 

submitted to the Agency for review. 

2. No person submits on the required 

schedule an adequate progress report on 

a study as required by the order. 

3. No person submits on the required 

schedule acceptable data as required by 

the final order. 

4. No person submits supportable 

certifications as to the conditions of 

submitted data, where required by order 

and where no other cited or submitted 

study meets the data requirements the 

study was intended to fulfill. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

As required by statute, this proposal 

to require submission of data in support 

of tolerances is in the form of an order 

and not a rule. (21 U.S.C. 346a(f)(1)(C)). 

Under the Administrative Procedures 

Act, orders are expressly excluded from 

the definition of a rule. (5 U.S.C. 

551(4)). Accordingly, the regulatory 

assessment requirements imposed on 

rulemaking do not, therefore, apply to 

this action. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: August 22, 2011. 

Peter Caulkins, 

Acting Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2011–22127 Filed 8–30–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 11–137, RM–11637; DA 11– 

1414] 

Television Broadcasting Services; 

Montgomery, AL 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission has before it 

a petition for rulemaking filed by 

Channel 32 Montgomery, LLC 

(‘‘Channel 32’’), the licensee of 

WNCF(TV), channel 32, Montgomery, 

Alabama, requesting the substitution of 

channel 31 for channel 32 at 

Montgomery. Channel 32 believes 

operating on channel 31 would offer 

more meaningful replication of the 

station’s former analog service area, and 

would significantly increase the 

geographic area within the station’s 

protected contour. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before September 30, 2011, and reply 

comments on or before October 17, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20554. In addition to filing comments 

with the FCC, interested parties should 

serve counsel for petitioner as follows: 

Louis Wall, Channel 32 Montgomery, 

LLC, 525 Blackburn Drive, Augusta, 

Georgia 30907. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joyce L. Bernstein, 

joyce.bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau, 

(202) 418–1647. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 

11–100, adopted June 9, 2011, and 

released June 10, 2011. The full text of 

this document is available for public 

inspection and copying during normal 

business hours in the FCC’s Reference 

Information Center at Portals II, CY– 

A257, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. This document 

will also be available via ECFS (http:// 

www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents 

will be available electronically in ASCII, 

Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This 

document may be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 

1–800–478–3160 or via e-mail http:// 

www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this 

document in accessible formats 

(computer diskettes, large print, audio 

recording, and Braille), send an e-mail 

to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the 

Commission’s Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 

418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 

(TTY). This document does not contain 

proposed information collection 

requirements subject to the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 

13. In addition, therefore, it does not 

contain any proposed information 

collection burden ‘‘for small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 

employees,’’ pursuant to the Small 

Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, 

Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). 

Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. Members of the public 

should note that from the time a Notice 

of Proposed Rulemaking is issued until 

the matter is no longer subject to 

Commission consideration or court 

review, all ex parte contacts (other than 

ex parte presentations exempt under 47 

CFR 1.1204(a)) are prohibited in 

Commission proceedings, such as this 

one, which involve channel allotments. 

See 47 CFR 1.1208 for rules governing 

restricted proceedings. 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS