alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 47 (Thursday, March 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal in formation concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of person al privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel Clinical Coordinating Support for NIDA Center for 
Clinical Trials Network (CCTN) (2221).
    Date: April 6, 2010.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 Research Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20850.
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 435-1439, 1f33c.nih.gov.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel Clinical Worlds: Enhancing Substance Abuse Provider 
Training Through Emerging Technologies (5544).
    Date: April 27, 2010.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 435-1439, 1f33c.nih.gov.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel Drug Scene Investigation Science (1138).
    Date: April 28, 2010.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 435-1439, 1f33c.nih.gov.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 4, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-5171 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# btate uf ffioutlj Carulina Office of tfje gnbernur

NIKKI R. 1'IALEY GOVERNOR 2 G 14 JA N i3 PM 12: 4 

# s

= ,,

1205 PENDLETON STREET COLUMBIA 29201
.Ianuary 7, 2014
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy USEPA Headquarters - Ariel Rios Building 1200 1'ennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code: I IOIA Washington, DC 20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy, I am disappointed that South C'arolina was not considered iior an EPA listening session as the agency soubht stal:eholder input on carbon standards planned for existing genei-ating units. Such standards, if overly stringent, especially as it relates to coal-tired generation, could have a major irnpact on our state's econoi-ny. Coal-hred genei-ation is an impoi-tant piece of'South Carolina's diverse energy supply. In fact, coal is responsible for 30% of our state's power generation and as a result, South Carolinians enjoy electricity rates below the national avei-age. I am concerned that EPA's cumulative e1'forts are leading our country and state down a dangerous path of over-reliance on natural bas or intermittent soiu-ces ol'energy like i-enewables. While a diverse energy mix is vital, EPA regulations threaten that balance. Already, over a dozen coal-tired units in South Carolina have been announced for retirement in light of recent EPA rulernakings. Further, p► • oposed New Source Pertormance Standards for new power plants call for limits on carbon cmissions far more stringent than today's proven tecllnologies can achieve. In a white papel- sent to the EI'A in September, SoLrth Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson questioned these "new regulations that venture well beyond the limits ol'the al;ency's authority." 'I'he paper demonshrates concerns regarding enfol-cement of carbon standards for existing generating units that deserve further inquiry. I believe the EPA would benetit greatly from seeking the input of South Carolinians as the agency considers setting carbon standards for existing generating units and invite you to plan a session here in the near future.
#### Carol C. Lowe *v.*Morton E. Lowe

Submitted December 13, 1967

decided January 16, 1968

*Sigmund L.*Miller, in support of the motion.

The motion by the plaintiff for an order directing the trial court to make a finding in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted limited to the rulings made at the hearing on May 13, 1966, on the motion for modification and at the hearing on June 30, 1966, on the motion for judgment.
**
**Exhibit 34.3**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Tothe Board of Directors 

Situs Holdings, LLC 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (Management’s Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(3)(i)and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Regulation AB (the applicable servicing criteria) for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting for theOperating or Trust Advisor Services Platform (the “Platform”), including only those asset-backed securities transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Appendix B to management’s assertionidentifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for Situs Holdings, LLC’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. 

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed thoseactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliancearising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In ouropinion, management’s assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

 

/s/ RSM US LLP

Duluth, Minnesota

January 31, 2019

 
1 

**
Order filed September 16, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00343

- CV

____________ VINCENT LILLY , Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 74682I



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due August 28, 2014

. No brief or motion for extension
of time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before October 15, 2014
, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

I, Andrew C. Traeger, Senior Vice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, certify:

 

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from November 1, 2015 through October 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 9, 2015 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2015-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 
| Date: January 12,   2017 | John Deere Capital   Corporation |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          | By                               | /s/*Andrew C.   Traeger* |   |
|                          |                             | Andrew C. Traeger |
|                          |                             | Senior Vice President   and Controller |
|                               |                                  |  |  |  |

 

----
§ 1.1092(b)-5T Definitions (temporary). The following definitions apply for purposes of §§ 1.1092(b)-1T through 1.1092(b)-4T. ( a ) *Disposing, disposes, or disposed.* The term *disposing, disposes,* or *disposed* includes the sale, exchange, cancellation, lapse, expiration, or other termination of a right or obligation with respect to personal property (as defined in section 1092(d)(1)).
( b ) *Hedging transaction.* The term *hedging transaction* means a hedging transaction as defined in section 1256(e).
( c ) *Identified straddle.* The term *identified straddle* means an identified straddle as defined in section 1092(a)(2)(B).
( d ) *Loss.* The term *loss* means a loss otherwise allowable under section 165(a) (without regard to the limitation contained in section 165(f)) and includes a write-down in inventory.
( e ) *Mixed straddle.* The term *mixed straddle* means a straddle— ( 1 ) All of the positions of which are held as capital assets;
( 2 ) At least one (but not all) of the positions of which is a section 1256 contract;
( 3 ) For which an election under section 1256(d) has not been made; and
( 4 ) Which is not part of a larger straddle.
( f ) *Non-section 1256 position.* The term *non-section 1256 position* means a position that is not a section 1256 contract.
( g ) *Offsetting position.* The term *offsetting position* means an offsetting position as defined in section 1092(c)(2).
( h ) *Position.* The term *position* means a position as defined in section 1092(d)(2).
( i ) [Reserved]
( j ) *Related person or flowthrough entity.* The term *related person or flowthrough entity* means a related person or flowthrough entity as defined in sections 1092(d)(4) (B) and (C) respectively.
( k ) *Section 1256 contract.* The term *section 1256 contract* means a section 1256 contract as defined in section 1256(b).
( l ) [Reserved]
( m ) *Straddle.* The term *straddle* means a straddle as defined in section 1092(c)(1).
( n ) *Successor position.* The term *successor position* means a position (“P”) that is or was at any time offsetting to a second position if— ( 1 ) The second position was offsetting to any loss position disposed of; and
( 2 ) P is entered into during a period commencing 30 days prior to, and ending 30 days after, the disposition of the loss position referred to in paragraph (n)(1) of this section.
( o ) *Unrecognized gain.* The term *unrecognized gain* means unrecognized gain as defined in section 1092(a)(3)(A).
( p ) *Substantially identical.* The term *substantially identical* has the same meaning as substantially identical in section 1091(a).
( q ) *Securities.* The term *security* means a security as defined in section 1236(c).
(Secs. 1092(b) and 7805 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (68A Stat. 917, 95 Stat. 324, 26 U.S.C. 1092(b), 7805) and sec. 102(h) of the Tax Reform Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 625))
[T.D. 8007, 50 FR 3321, Jan. 24, 1985, as amended by T.D. 8070, 51 FR 1788, Jan. 15, 1986]
#### § 1.1052-2 Basis of property established by Revenue Act of 1934.

Section 1052(b) provides that if property was acquired after February 28, 1913, in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1936, and the basis of the property for the purposes of the Revenue Act of 1934 (48 Stat. 683) was prescribed by section 113(a) (6), (7), or (8) of that act, then for purposes of subtitle A of the Code, the basis shall be the same as the basis prescribed in the Revenue Act of 1934. For example, if after December 31, 1920, and in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 1936, property was acquired by a corporation by the issuance of its stock or securities in connection with a transaction which is not described in section 112(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 but which is described in section 112(b)(5) of the Revenue Act of 1934, the basis of the property so acquired shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferor, with proper adjustments to the date of the exchange.
# C_2016098EN.01003301.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2016 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)

(Case T-194/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark AEROSTONE - Earlier Community word marks STONE and BRIDGESTONE - Earlier non-registered national figurative mark BRIDGESTONE - Relative ground for refusal - Partial refusal of registration))

(2016/C 098/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bristol Global Co. Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Bozhinova, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bridgestone Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented initially by M. Blair, Solicitor, and subsequently by S. Malynicz, Barrister, and C. Balme and K. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 December 2013 (Case R 916/2013-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Bridgestone Corp. and Bristol Global Co. Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bristol Global Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Bridgestone Corp. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bristol Global Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Bridgestone Corp.

---

(1)  OJ C 151, 19.5.2014.

1

---
#### § 814.17 Service of orders.

Orders issued under this part will be served in person by a designated officer or employee of FDA on, or by registered mail to, the applicant or the designated agent at the applicant's or designated agent's last known address in FDA's records.
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.5550 Alternating pressure air flotation mattress. ( a ) *Identification.* An alternating pressure air flotation mattress is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of a mattress with multiple air cells that can be filled and emptied in an alternating pattern by an associated control unit to provide regular, frequent, and automatic changes in the distribution of body pressure. The device is used to prevent and treat decubitus ulcers (bed sores).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 880.9.
[45 FR 69682, Oct. 21, 1980, as amended at 63 FR 59229, Nov. 3, 1998]
§ 884.4400 Obstetric forceps. ( a ) *Identification.* An obstetric forceps is a device consisting of two blades, with handles, designed to grasp and apply traction to the fetal head in the birth passage and facilitate delivery.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
[45 FR 12684, Feb. 26, 1980, as amended at 84 FR 71816, Dec. 30, 2019]
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Weida Communications, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Mitchell Sepaniak, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andJoseph Zumwalt, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |                                       | /s/  Mitchell Sepaniak |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:  | **Mitchell  Sepaniak**                     |                   |
| Title: | **President  and Chief Executive Officer** |                   |
| Date:  | **November  22, 2004**                     |                   |

 
|   |                         | /s/  Joseph Zumwalt |   |   |
|--------|------------------------------|---------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:  | **Joseph  Zumwalt**          |                |
| Title: | **Chief  Financial Officer** |                |
| Date:  | **November  22, 2004**       |                |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

p0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

141917 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141917 

 COA: 291208 

Washtenaw CC: 08-000538-FC 

ANTONIO LAMONT WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 30, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32



Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



Thomas A. Borner, President and Chief Executive
Officer and Robert J. Halloran, Jr., Executive Vice President and Treasurer of PB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) each
certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 and that to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  | /s/    Thomas
    A. Borner           
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date:  October 25, 2016 |  | Thomas A. Borner                      
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer 
|                        |  |                                       
|                        |  | /s/    Robert
    J. Halloran, Jr.    
|Date: October 25, 2016  |  |                                       
|                        |  | Robert J. Halloran, Jr.               
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Treasurer



The purpose of this statement is solely
to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to PB Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by PB Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.