alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 145 (Thursday, July 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18193]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Partially Closed Meeting of the U.S. Naval Academy 
Board of Visitors

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Naval Academy Board of Visitors will meet to make 
such inquiry, as the Board shall deem necessary into the state of 
morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, 
fiscal affairs, and academic methods of the Naval Academy. The meeting 
will include discussions of personnel issues at the Naval Academy, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy. The executive session of this meeting will be closed 
to the public.

DATES: The open session of the meeting will be held on Monday, 
September 14th, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. The closed Executive 
Session will be held from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Russell Senate Office 
Building, Room SR-385, Washington DC. The meeting will be handicap 
accessible.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander David S. Forman, 
USN, Executive Secretary to the Board of Visitors, Office of the 
Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402-5000, 
telephone: (410) 293-1503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of meeting is provided per the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.). The 
executive session of the meeting will consist of discussions of 
personnel issues at the Naval Academy and internal Board of Visitors 
matters. The proposed closed session from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. will 
include a discussion of new and pending administrative/minor 
disciplinary infractions and nonjudicial punishments involving the 
Midshipmen attending the Naval Academy to include but not limited to 
individual honor/conduct violations within the Brigade. Discussion of 
such information cannot be adequately segregated from other topics, 
which precludes opening the executive session of this meeting to the 
public. Accordingly, the Secretary of the Navy has determined in 
writing that the meeting shall be partially closed to the public 
because it will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(5), 
(6), and (7) of title 5, United States Code.

    Dated: July 23, 2009.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps U.S. Navy, Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-18193 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7961 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7961

To authorize a higher Federal share for emergency relief funds for the 
  reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge located in Baltimore 
City and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, that collapsed 
               on March 26, 2024, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2024

Mr. Mfume (for himself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
 Harris, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Trone, and Mr. Ivey) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize a higher Federal share for emergency relief funds for the 
  reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge located in Baltimore 
City and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, that collapsed 
               on March 26, 2024, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Baltimore Bridge Response Invests 
and Delivers Global Economic Relief Act'' or the ``Baltimore BRIDGE 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDING.

    Congress finds that, in accordance with section 668.105(e) of title 
23, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), any 
compensation for damages or insurance proceeds, including interest, 
recovered by a State, a political subdivision of a State, or a toll 
authority for repair, including reconstruction, of the bridge described 
in section 3 in response to the damage described in that section should 
be used on receipt to reduce liability on the repair, including 
reconstruction, of that bridge from the emergency fund authorized under 
section 125 of title 23, United States Code.

SEC. 3. FEDERAL SHARE FOR CERTAIN EMERGENCY RELIEF PROJECTS.

    Notwithstanding subsection (e) of section 120 of title 23, United 
States Code, the Federal share for emergency relief funds made 
available under section 125 of that title to respond to damage caused 
by the cargo ship Dali to the Francis Scott Key Bridge located in 
Baltimore City and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, 
including reconstruction of that bridge and its approaches, shall be 
100 percent.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect as if enacted on March 26, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.3600 Intraocular lens. ( a ) *Identification.* An intraocular lens is a device made of materials such as glass or plastic intended to be implanted to replace the natural lens of an eye.
( b ) *Classification.* Class III.
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* As of May 28, 1976, an approval under section 515 of the act is required before this device may be commercially distributed. See § 886.3.
#### Terminal Taxi Company et al. *v.*Kenneth Flynn, Administrator (Estate of Ralph J. Flynn)

Argued March 5

decided March 5, 1968

*Richard J. Parrett,*for the appellees (plaintiffs).

*John H. Peck,*for the appellant (defendant).

The motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EL E VENTH CIRCUIT

____________________________ No. 13

- 14989 Non

- Argument Calendar

__________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:11

- cv
- 00145

- BAE

- GRS THOMAS UHLIG,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

versus DARBY BANK & TRUST CO., et al. , Defendant s, DRAYPROP, LLC, DRAYPARK, LLC, MICHAEL BROWN, MARLEY MANAGEMENT, INC., REUBEN CROLL, Defendants

– Appellants.

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia

____________ ______________ ( February 26, 2014 ) Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 1 of 102 Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS , and FAY , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM : The District Court granted appellee’s motions for summary judgment on appellant’s claims for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentatio n, and entered judgment for appellees. Appellant appeals. We affirm the District Court’s judgment, finding no merit in appellant’s claims for the reasons stated in the District Court’s dispositive order of October 4, 2013, which is attached as an appendi x. AFFIRMED. Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 2 of 10Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 3 of 10Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 4 of 10Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 5 of 10Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 6 of 10Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 7 of 10Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 8 of 10Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 9 of 10Case: 13-14989 Date Filed: 02/26/2014 Page: 10 of 10
Application Under the Small Community Air Service Development Program

Bert Mooney Airport Authority**Summary Information** 

# Summary Information

A. Applicant Information:

( Check all that apply)

X Not a

Consortium Interstate

Consortiu m Intrastate

Consortium

X Community now receives EAS subsidy

X Community (or Consortium member) previously

received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient:

D ate of grant: 09 / 07 /04 02/24/10

E xpiration date: 09/06 04 /12*

Federal funds requested: $360,000 $460,000

Carrier service obtained: N/A N/A

Destination(s) served: N/A N/A

* BTM SCASD P returned due to conversion of

service to EAS

B. Public/Private Partnerships:

(List organization names)

Public Private

1. Bert Mooney Air port

Authority 1. Butte

- Silver Bow

Chamber of Commerce

2. City/County of Butte

Silver Bow 2. Butte Local Development

Corporation

C

. Project Proposal:

(Check all that apply)

X Marketing Start

- Up Cost

Offset

Travel Bank Secure Additional

Service

Surface Transportation New Route

Launch New Carrier Subsidy

Study Revenue

Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration Other ( explain

below ): Regional Service

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS X Pub lished Instrument Approach

X Localizer X Outer/Middle Marker

X Other (specify): V OR, GPS, RNAV E. Project Cost:

Line Description Sub

Total Total

Amount

1 Federal amount requested $150,000

2 State cash financial

contribution $0

Local cash financi al

contribution

3a. Airport cash funds $2,500

3b. Non

- airport cash funds $12,500

3 Total local cash funds

(3a+3b) $15,000

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING

(1.+2.+3c.) $165,000

In

- Kind contribution

5a. Airport in

- kind

contribution ** $5,000

5b. Othe r in

- kind

contribution ** $5,000

5 TOTAL IN

- KIND

CONTRIBUTION (5a.+5b.) $10,000

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST

(4 +5) $175,000

F. In

- Kind C ontribution s** :

5a. Strategic plan staffing/monitoring

5b. Strategic plan staffing/monitoring

G. Is this application su bject to review by State

under Executive Order 12372 process?

a. This application was made available to the

State under the Executive Order 12372. Process

for review on (date) _____________.

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not

been selected by the State for review.

c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. Is the Applicant delinquent on any Federal

debt? (if “yes”, provide explanation)

No

Yes (explain ) X X
39252.

39253.

#### FLETCHER v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. HENDERSON v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT.

Decided January 29, 1962.

Hall, Judge.

Each of these cases was a condemnation proceeding brought under the three-assessor law set forth in Chapter 36 of Georgia Code Annotated.

The issue in each case is the same as that in *City of Atlanta v. Lunsford,*ante, and the decision there is controlling.

The condemnor paid into the registry of the court the sum awarded to the condemnee by the appointed assessors, and the court paid the sum to the condemnee. The condemnor appealed from the assessors’ award. The court entered judgment for the condemnor for the difference between the assessors’ award and the jury’s verdict, plus interest at *7%*per annum from the date the condemnee withdrew the award from the court. Thereafter the trial court denied a motion made by the condemnee to amend the judgment by striking the provision for interest. The condemnee assigns error on the order denying its motion to amend the judgment.

The trial court erred in denying condemnee’s motion to amend the judgment.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Felton, C. J., and Bell, J., concur.*

*252
      *Robert Edward Surles,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Carter Goode, Richard L. Chambers, Assistant Attorneys-General, F. H. Boney,*contra.'

*Poole, Pearce ■& Hall,*amicus curiae.
EXHIBIT 99.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Director, Principal and Principal Executive Officer of C&M Management Inc, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                | American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership
|--------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                |                                                   
|                | By:                                               
|                |                                                   
|                |                                                   
|                | By:                                               
|                |                                                   
|                |                                                   
|                | By:                                               
|                |                                                   
|                |                                                   
|Date:           |                                                   
|August 20, 2003 | By:                                               
|                |                                                   
|                |                                                   
|                |
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1986-D  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet  and  statement  of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,715
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,371
<PP&E>                                         12,819,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,392,847)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,584,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,960
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,459,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,584,932
<SALES>                                        184,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,493
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,196<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (25,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (25,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25,363)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101951 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Separate Account One of our report dated March 26, 2003, relating to the
financial statements of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company, and of
our report dated February 21, 2003, relating to the financial statements of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate Account One, appearing
in the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such
Registration Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading
"Independent Public Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
# C_2016098EN.01003901.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2016 — Bon Net v OHIM — Aldi (Bon Appétit!)

(Case T-485/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Bon Appétit! - Prior national figurative marks Бoн Апемú and Bon Apetí - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 098/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bon Net OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Ivanova, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: L, Kolks, C. Fürsen, N. Lützenrath and U. Rademacher, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2014 (Case R 1199/2013-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Bon Net OOD and Aldi GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bon Net OOD to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Aldi GmbH & Co. KG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bon Net OOD to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Aldi GmbH & Co. KG.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
# C_2015346EN.01003001.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — SV Capital v EBA

(Case T-660/14) (1)

1

((Economic and monetary policy - Application to initiate an investigation for an alleged breach of EU law - Decision of the EBA - Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities - Finding of the Court of its own motion - Lack of competence of the author of the act - Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Delay - Partly inadmissible))

(2015/C 346/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SV Capital OÜ (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: M. Greinoman, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Banking Authority (EBA) (represented by: J. Overett Somnier and Z. Giotaki, acting as Agents, and by F. Tuytschaever, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment, first, of Decision C 2013 002 of the EBA of 21 February 2014 rejecting the applicant’s request for an investigation to be initiated against the Estonian and Finnish financial sector supervisory authorities, pursuant to Article 17(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ 2010 L 331, p. 12), as a result of an alleged breach of EU law and, secondly, of Decision 2014-C1-02 of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities of 14 July 2014 dismissing the action brought against that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision 2014-C1-02 of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities of 14 July 2014; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision 2014-C1-02 of the Board of Appeal of the European Supervisory Authorities of 14 July 2014;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.

1

---