alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7988 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to include requirements 

relating to new small business entrants in the scorecard 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7988 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Pro3 curement and Utilization Reform Act of 2024’’ or the 

4 ‘‘SPUR Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO SCORECARD REQUIREMENTS. 

6 Section 15(y) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 644(y)) is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

9 (A) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as 

10 subparagraph (F); and 

11 (B) by inserting after subparagraph (D) 

12 the following new subparagraph: 

13 ‘‘(E) The number of new small business 

14 entrants, including new small business entrants 

15 that are small business concerns owned and 

16 controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified 

17 HUBZone small business concerns, small busi18 ness concerns owned and controlled by socially 

19 and economically disadvantaged individuals, and 

20 small business concerns owned and controlled 

21 by women awarded prime contracts in each 

22 North American Industry Classification System 

23 code during the fiscal year, and a comparison 

24 to the number awarded prime contracts during 

25 the prior fiscal year, if available.’’; 
3 

•HR 7988 EH

1 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘subpara2 graphs (B) through (E) of paragraph (2)’’ and in3 serting ‘‘subparagraphs (B) through (F) of para4 graph (2)’’; and 

5 (3) by amending paragraph (6) to read as fol6 lows: 

7 ‘‘(6) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

8 ‘‘(A) NEW SMALL BUSINESS ENTRANT.— 

9 The term ‘new small business entrant’ means a 

10 small business concern that— 

11 ‘‘(i) has been awarded a prime con12 tract; and 

13 ‘‘(ii) has not previously been awarded 

14 a prime contract by the Federal Govern15 ment. 

16 ‘‘(B) SCORECARD.—The term ‘scorecard’ 

17 means any summary using a rating system to 

18 evaluate the efforts of a Federal agency to meet 

19 goals established under subsection (g)(1)(B) 

20 that— 

21 ‘‘(i) includes the measures described 

22 in paragraph (2); and 

23 ‘‘(ii) assigns a score to each Federal 

24 agency evaluated.’’. 
4 

•HR 7988 EH

1 SEC. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO. 

2 No additional amounts are authorized to be appro3 priated to carry out this Act or the amendments made 

4 by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7988 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to include repurposes. trants in the scorecard program, and for other quirements relating to new small business en-
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of September16, 2015, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2015-C, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding, LLC (formerly known as Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation), as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trusteeand Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1)          Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)          Areview of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Relevant Period”) andof the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)          Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 15th day of March, 2018.
Exhibit 35.2

LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling
and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an
authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida limited liability
companyBy: /s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident


Dated: February 22, 2017





1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700
 Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

CGCMT 2015-GC33

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33

Citibank,N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York NY 10013

John Hannon

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich
Street, 5th Floor

New York NY 10013

Paul Vanderslice

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 19th Floor

New York NY 10013

Richard Simpson

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 17th Floor

New York NY 10013

Ryan M. OConnor

Situs Holdings, LLC

5065 Westheimer, Suite 700E

Attn: Legal Department

Houston TX 77052

Legal Department

Situs Holdings, LLC

2 Embarcadero, Suite 1300

San Francisco CA 94111

Stacey Ciarlanti
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

August 11, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00424

- CV

UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

,

Appellant

v.

Patricia Y. MAYERS

, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021

- CVH001030

- D1 Honorable Joe Lopez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief is currently due August 17, 2022. On August 10, 2022, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief until September 6, 2022. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant to file its brief by September 6, 2022

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of August, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
PUBLIC LAW 115–21—APR. 3, 2017 131 STAT. 87 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 83: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017): 

Mar. 1, considered and passed House. 

Mar. 22, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–21 

115th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ‘‘Clarification of Employer’s Continuing Obligation to Make and Maintain an Accurate 

Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness’’. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress 

disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating 

to ‘‘Clarification of Employer’s Continuing Obligation to Make and 

Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness’’ 

(published at 81 Fed. Reg. 91792 (December 19, 2016)), and such 

rule shall have no force or effect. 

Approved April 3, 2017. 

Apr. 3, 2017 

[H.J. Res. 83] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
JEAN COULTER, Petitioner

v.
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, JAMES E. MAHOOD, WILDER & MAHOOD, MELANIE S. ROTHEY, CHARLES J. AVALLI, LOUIS C. LONG, PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION, AND THOMAS J. DOERR, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 412 WAL 2014
Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 10th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
# C_2015007EN.01003602.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/36

---

Action brought on 7 October 2014 — CEAHR v Commission

(Case T-712/14)

(2015/C 007/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Confédération Européenne des Associations d’Horlogers-Réparateurs (CEAHR) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Mathijsen and P. Dyrberg, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the European Commission’s Decision C(2014) 5462 final, of 29 July 2014, void; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the European Commission’s Decision C(2014) 5462 final, of 29 July 2014, void;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 5462 final of 29 July 2014 in case AT.39097 — Watch Repair, by which the Commission rejects the applicant’s complaint pursuant to Article 7(2) of Regulation No 773/2004 (1) concerning the refusal by several manufacturers of prestige/luxury watches to supply spare parts to independent repairers.

1

In support of the action, the applicant submits that i) the Commission’s findings are based on manifest errors of appraisal, in law and fact, ii) that the contested decision fails to provide appropriate reasoning for the Commission’s findings and iii) that the contested decision is the result of a procedure during which the Commission failed to attentively examine the elements of law and fact raised in the complaint, in violation of applicant’s right to good administration.

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles [101 TFEU] and [102 TFEU] (OJ 2004 L 123, p. 18).

1

---
exv10w3



 




EXHIBIT 10.3


CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the use of our report dated January 27, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Commerce One, Inc., included
in the annual report on Form 20-F, as amended, of SAP Aktiengesellschaft
Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte in Der Datenverarbeitung and subsidiaries (“SAP
AG”) that is made a part of the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.
333-60399, 333-65083, 333-30380, 333-41762, 333-63496, 333-63464 and
333-102564) of SAP AG.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Walnut Creek, California





April 14, 2003
#### § 1.1402(a)-3 Special rules for computing net earnings from self-employment.

For the purpose of computing net earnings from self-employment, the gross income derived by an individual from a trade or business carried on by him, the allowable deductions attributable to such trade or business, and the individual's distributive share of the income or loss, described in section 702(a)(9), from any trade or business carrier on by a partnership of which he is a member shall be computed in accordance with the special rules set forth in §§ 1.1402(a)-4 to 1.1402(a)-17, inclusive.

[T.D. 7333, 39 FR 44445, Dec. 24, 1974]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         272,129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                      2,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               481,378
<PP&E>                                       3,149,781
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,281,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,715,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,661,389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,709,061
<COMMON>                                        16,550
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,328,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,715,130
<SALES>                                        200,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,272
<CGS>                                            6,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,423,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             480,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,597,289)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (10,597,289)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 78,864
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (10,518,425)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.09)



</TABLE>
|                                                                                                          |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (logo)ncb

National    Cooperative Bank

 

2011    Crystal Drive

Suite,    800

Arlington,    VA 22202 |
|                                                                                                          |

#  

# February6, 2018

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2ndFloor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE:     Annual Statement as to Compliance

           WFCM 2015 LC22

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-LC22,as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB(the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereofthat:

 

a.       A review of theactivities of the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.      To the best of myknowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilled all obligationsunder this agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annualfinancial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31,2018.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President,Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank,N.A.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on 
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-80927, 333-63169, and 333-63249) of Celeris Corporation
(formerly Summit Medical Systems, Inc.) of our report dated April 3, 1997, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Celeris
Corporation (formerly Summit Medical Systems, Inc.) for the year ended December
31, 1996, included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 1998. 



                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 26, 1999
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton 

JAMES CLAYPOOLE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0867-05-2 PER CURIAM 

 OCTOBER 25, 2005 

PETERSBURG DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PETERSBURG 

Pamela S. Baskervill, Judge 

 (Richard G. White, Jr., on brief), for appellant. 

 (Joan M. O’Donnell, on brief), for appellee. 

 (James Wicker Traylor, on brief), Guardian ad litem for the infant 

child. 

 James Claypoole appeals the trial court’s decision terminating his residual parental rights 

to his daughter, born February 3, 2004. Claypoole contends the evidence was insufficient to 

support the trial court’s decision because the Petersburg Department of Social Services failed to 

make reasonable and appropriate efforts to remedy substantially the conditions which led to or 

required continuation of his daughter’s foster care placement. He argues the trial court erred in 

finding the Department met its duty to investigate placement with paternal relatives. Because the 

record before us reveals no objections to the trial court’s ruling, we decline to address this issue 

for the first time on appeal. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. 

Rule 5A:27. 

 The record includes the trial court’s March 10, 2005 order and a Statement of Facts 

drafted by Claypoole. Neither the order nor the Statement of Facts indicate any objection by 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
 - 2 - 

Claypoole to the trial court’s decision. In addition, Claypoole has failed to indicate in his brief 

“the page(s) of the . . . written statement, record, or appendix where each question was preserved 

in the trial court.” Rule 5A:20. 

 “No ruling of the trial court . . . will be considered as a basis for reversal unless the 

objection was stated together with the grounds therefor at the time of the ruling, except for good 

cause shown or to enable the Court of Appeals to attain the ends of justice.” Rule 5A:18. 

Claypoole has offered no argument that this appeal concerns the “good cause” exception. 

 Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. See Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.
Letter of Amendment of Race Car Agreement



EXHIBIT 10.6 
 
[TRAC Letterhead] 
 
March 13, 2003 
 
Riley & Scott Racing 
1200 N Main St. 
Speedway, IN 46224 
 
The purpose of this letter is to confirm the verbal amendment of the contract between Riley & Scott and Team Racing Auto Circuit (TRAC) dated October 19, 2001. 
 
Based on TRAC’s inability to make scheduled payments in accordance with the aforementioned contract the following
payments were made: 
 

	 	1.	 	$500,000 payment made prior to August 30, 2002 

 

	 	2.	 	Monthly payments of $50,000 for the six months beginning October 1, 2002 

 
Based on the revised payment schedule, Riley & Scott suspended production of the race cars. Given eight weeks lead time,
Riley & Scott is prepared to agree upon and resume car production under amended production and payment schedules when notified by TRAC. 
 
We confirm to you that TRAC is not in violation of this agreement as amended as of December 31, 2002 and through the date of this letter. Additionally, we
confirm to you that no additional amounts or penalties were due under this contract as of December 31, 2002. 
 

	 /s/    TERRY
HANSON        

	 	 	 	 	 	 April 7, 2003


	 Terry Hanson
 President, Team Racing Auto Circuit
	 	 	 	 	 	 Date

	
	 /s/    RON
MCMAHON        

	 	 	 	 	 	 April 7, 2003


	 Riley & Scott Racing, LLC
	 	 	 	 	 	 Date
#### § 1.432 [Reserved]
#### § 1.1561-0 Table of contents.

This section lists the table of contents for §§ 1.1561-1 through 1.1561-3.

## § 1.1561-1 General rules regarding certain tax benefits available to the component members of a controlled group of corporations.

(a) In general.

(1) Limitation.

(2) Definitions.

(b) Special rules.

(1) S Corporation.

(2) 52-53-week taxable year.

(c) Tax avoidance.

(d) Effective/applicability date.

## § 1.1561-2 Special rules for allocating reductions of certain Section 1561(a) tax-benefit items.

(a) Additional tax.

(1) Calculation.

(2) Apportionment.

(3) Examples.

(b) Reduction to the amount exempted from the alternative minimum tax.

(1) Calculation.

(2) Apportionment.

(3) Examples.

(c) Accumulated earnings credit.

(d) [Reserved]

(e) Short taxable year not including a December 31st date.

(1) General rule.

(2) Additional rules.

(3) Calculation of the additional tax.

(4) Calculation of the alternative minimum tax.

(5) Examples.

(f) Effective/applicability date.

## § 1.1561-3 Allocation of the section 1561(a) tax items.

(a) Filing of form.

(1) In general.

(2) Exception for component members that are members of a consolidated group.

(b) No apportionment plan in effect.

(c) Apportionment plan in effect.

(1) Adoption of plan.

(2) Limitation on adopting a plan.

(3) Termination of plan.

(d) Effective/applicability date.

[T.D. 9476, 74 FR 68532, Dec. 28, 2009]
427 A.2d 1228

#### Commonwealth v. Newkirk, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 1979.

John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, WIEAND and VAN der VOORT, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

PRICE, J., noted his dissent.
Order filed February 14, 2017

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00968-CR

____________

GUADALUPE WALLY RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1481921

ORDER

On January 10, 2017, this court issued an order to the Harris County District 

Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record by January 20, 2017. The court has not 

received the supplemental clerk’s record.

Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is ordered to file the ordered

supplemental record by February 24, 2017, containing the following document: the 

judgment.
2

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record in each appeal containing a certified statement that 

the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM