alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1.105-3 Payments unrelated to absence from work.

Section 105(c) provides an exclusion from gross income with respect to the amounts referred to in section 105(a) to the extent that such amounts (a) constitute payments for the permanent loss or permanent loss of use of a member or function of the body, or the permanent disfigurement, of the taxpayer, his spouse, or a dependent (as defined in section 152), and (b) are computed with reference to the nature of the injury without regard to the period the employee is absent from work. Loss of use or disfigurement shall be considered permanent when it may reasonably be expected to continue for the life of the individual. For purposes of section 105(c), loss or loss of use of a member or function of the body includes the loss or loss of use of an appendage of the body, the loss of an eye, the loss of substantially all of the vision of an eye, and the loss of substantially all of the hearing in one or both ears. The term “disfigurement” shall be given a reasonable interpretation in the light of all the particular facts and circumstances. Section 105(c) does not apply if the amount of the benefits is determined by reference to the period the employee is absent from work. For example, if an employee is absent from work as a result of the loss of an arm, and under the accident and health plan established by his employer, he is to receive $125 a week so long as he is absent from work for a period not in excess of 52 weeks, section 105(c) is not applicable to such payments. See, however, section 105(d) and § 1.105-4. However, for purposes of section 105(c), it is immaterial whether an amount is paid in a lump sum or in installments. Section 105(c) does not apply to amounts which are treated as workmen's compensation under paragraph (b) of § 1.104-1, or to amounts paid by reason of the death of the employee (see section 101).
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Standard technical specifications,General Electric BWR/4 plants.
 
Vol. 1| Vol. 2
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:10/1433/REV.4/V.1-2
Item Number:1051-H-48 (online)
CGP System Number:001017408
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 29, 2017********
§ 74.2334 D&C Red No. 34. ( a ) *Identity and specifications.* The color additive D&C Red No. 34 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 74.1334(a)(1) and (b).
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* D&C Red No. 34 may be safely used for coloring externally applied cosmetics in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice.
( c ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Certification.* All batches of D&C Red No. 34 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
§ 884.4350 Fetal head elevator. ( a ) *Identification.* A fetal head elevator is a prescription device consisting of a mechanism that elevates the fetal head to facilitate delivery during a Caesarean section.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 2 ) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of patient-contacting components of the device.
( 3 ) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
( 4 ) Non-clinical performance data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Reliability testing of device deployment and retrieval under relevant use conditions must be conducted.
( ii ) Testing of the maximum force applied to the fetal head in an anatomic model must be conducted.
( iii ) Testing of uniform application of the elevator mechanism on the fetal head must be conducted.
( 5 ) Labeling must include the following: ( i ) Contraindication for use in the presence of active genital infection;
( ii ) Specific instructions regarding the proper placement and use of the device; and
( iii ) A shelf life.
[82 FR 60114, Dec. 19, 2017]
#### Ficken *v.*Stern *et al.*

No. 8662.

May 12, 1932.

*G. B. Presley,*for plaintiff.

*Herbert J. Haas*and *Sol I. Golden,*for defendants.

Beck, P. J.

This case is controlled by the decision in *Ficken*v. *Haas,*173 *Ga.*813 (161 S. E. 616).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concu/r, except Hines, J., absent for providential cause.*
#### § 1.307-2 Exception.

The basis of rights to buy stock which are excluded from gross income under section 305(a), shall be zero if the fair market value of such rights on the date of distribution is less than 15 percent of the fair market value of the old stock on that date, unless the shareholder elects to allocate part of the basis of the old stock to the rights as provided in paragraph (a) of § 1.307-1. The election shall be made by a shareholder with respect to all the rights received by him in a particular distribution in respect of all the stock of the same class owned by him in the issuing corporation at the time of such distribution. Such election to allocate basis to rights shall be in the form of a statement attached to the shareholder's return for the year in which the rights are received. This election, once made, shall be irrevocable with respect to the rights for which the election was made. Any shareholder making such an election shall retain a copy of the election and of the tax return with which it was filed, in order to substantiate the use of an allocated basis upon a subsequent disposition of the stock acquired by exercise.
BF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0065

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

VINCENT SCOTT PARKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IS IT HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including June 8, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 3 2020

04/03/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0065
#### § 1.411(a)-9 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Francis H. Murphy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
   annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: June 14, 2004

/s/ Francis H, Murphy
--------------------------
Francis H. Murphy
Chief Executive Officer

                                       36
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Weida Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly periodended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mitchell Sepaniak, as Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph Zumwalt, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of each such officer’s knowledge:

 

(1)                 The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                 The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|       |                                       | /s/ Mitchell Sepaniak |   |   |
|------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:      | **Mitchell  Sepaniak**                     |                  |
| Title:     | **President and Chief Executive  Officer** |                  |
| Date:      | **April 7,  2005**                    |                  |
| ** ** | ** **                                 | ** **            |
|       |                                       | /s/ Joseph Zumwalt    |   |   |
| Name:      | **Joseph  Zumwalt**                        |                  |
| Title:     | **Chief  Financial Officer**               |                  |
| Date:      | **April 7,  2005**                    |                  |
|            |                                            |                       |        |        |  |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except toextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2016211EN.01001802.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam — Netherlands) —  AK (*1) v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand

(Case C-5/15) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Legal expenses insurance - Directive 87/344/EEC - Article 4(1) - Free choice of lawyer for an insured person - Inquiry or proceedings - Definition - Objection to refusal of authorisation for care))

(2016/C 211/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AK (*1)

Defendants: Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV, Stichting Achmea Rechtsbijstand

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(1)(a) of Council Directive 87/344/EEC of 22 June 1987 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to legal expenses insurance must be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘inquiry’ referred to in that provision covers the stage of an objection before a public body during which that body gives a decision against which an action may be brought before the courts.

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ C 107, 30.3.2015.

---
May 19, 2015
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
Docket No. FAA-2015-0719 This is an email response to Jake Troutman concerning the proposed UAS make/model/ type. The UAS is a battery powered, quad-rotor, rotorcraft category UAS with the following specifications:

UAS Category Rotorcraft Number of Rotors 4 Number of Engines 4 Manufacturer DJI Model T600 (Inspire 1) Basic Empty Weight (including camera)2365 g (5.21 pounds) Max Gross Weight (including camera)2935 g (6.47 pounds) Hovering Accuracy Vertical: .5 meters Horizontal: 2.5 meters Max Angular Velocity Pitch: 300o/s Yaw: 150o/s Max Pitch/Roll Attitude 35o Max Ascent Speed 980 fpm Max Descent Speed 780 fpm Max Forward Speed 42.7 knots Max Flight Endurance Time 18 minutes Max Flight Altitude 14,700 MSLMotor Model DJI 3510 Propeller Model DJI 1345 Operating Temperature Range-10o to 40o C Dimensions 438x451x301 mm Landing Gear Skid-type / Semi-Retractable Remote Controller C1 Remote Operating Frequency 5.725-5.825 GHz;2.4-2.483 GHz Remote Transmitting Distance 1.08 nm Remote Power Supply Built-in battery Remote Dual User Capability Host-and-Slave connection Aircraft Battery Model TB47 Aircraft Battery Capacity 4500 mAh Aircraft Battery Voltage 22.2 V Aircraft Battery Type LiPo 6S High voltage battery Aircraft Battery Energy 99.9 Wh Aircraft Battery Weight 570 g (1.25 pounds) Aircraft Battery Operating Temperature Range -10o to 40o C

Sincerely,

Jordan Schultz Schultz ATM 10418 Shire Country San Antonio, TX 78254
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         437,000
<SECURITIES>                                   310,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,953,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    95,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,900,000
<PP&E>                                         938,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 546,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,054,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,199,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,453,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,054,000
<SALES>                                     22,619,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,619,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,822,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,769,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,035,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   466,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            569,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   569,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
39322.

#### CITY OF ATLANTA v. LUNSFORD.

Decided January 29, 1962.

*J. C. Savage, Martin McFarland,*for plaintiff in error.

*Poole, Pearce ■& Hall, William F. Lozier,*contra.

Eberhaedt, Judge.

The facts and the .issue in this case are substantially the same as in *City of Atlanta v. Lunsford,*ante, and the ruling there is determinative of the issue here.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Custer, J., concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TIMOTHY L. WATTS,

 Respondent

 v.

MANHEIM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 191 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Does the Public School Code of 1949 require the Manheim Township

School District to provide transportation services to a resident pupil to and

from more than one location within the school district?

(2) Did the Commonwealth Court err in interpreting In re Residence Hearing

Before Bd. of Sch. Dir., Cumberland Valley Sch. Dist., 744 A.2d 1272 (Pa.

2000), to mean that a child can have more than one residence for school

purposes, including transportation services under Section 1361 of the

Public School Code of 1949?

M.D. Appeal Dkt.

112 2014
# C_2015026EN.01003601.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/36

---

Action brought on 6 November 2014 — Segimerus v OHIM — Ergo Versicherungsgruppe (ELGO)

(Case T-750/14)

(2015/C 026/46)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Segimerus Ltd (Preston, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Henkel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ergo Versicherungsgruppe AG (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Segimerus Ltd

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ELGO’ — Community trade mark No 1 0 2 92  498

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 August 2014 in Case R 473/2014-4

Contested decision

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Opposition Division and refer the proceedings back to the Opposition Division; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Opposition Division and refer the proceedings back to the Opposition Division;

| — | in the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the proceedings back to the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the contested decision and refer the proceedings back to the Board of Appeal;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 75(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---