# C_2014329EN.01001901.xml

| 22.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/19

---

Action brought on 30 June 2014 — Mayer v EFSA

(Case T-493/14)

2014/C 329/27

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ingrid Alice Mayer (Ellwangen, Germany) (represented by: T. Mayer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Food Safety Authority

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | extend her secondment up to 30 June 2015; |
| --- | --- |

—

extend her secondment up to 30 June 2015;

| — | declare unlawful the termination of her secondment agreement, more precisely the EFSA decision ‘Termination of the secondment’ of 16 April 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare unlawful the termination of her secondment agreement, more precisely the EFSA decision ‘Termination of the secondment’ of 16 April 2014;

| — | order the defendant not to allow the ‘observer’ position of the seconded national expert on the staff committee to be re-selected; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant not to allow the ‘observer’ position of the seconded national expert on the staff committee to be re-selected;

| — | declare unlawful the six-month suspension of her staff-committee activity; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare unlawful the six-month suspension of her staff-committee activity;

| — | order that she be granted access to all e-mails which were exchanged between the EFSA director and a private-law organisation active in the food sector; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that she be granted access to all e-mails which were exchanged between the EFSA director and a private-law organisation active in the food sector;

| — | in the alternative, order that that access to documents be granted to a third party, to be determined by the General Court, in order to examine a possible conflict of interests; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, order that that access to documents be granted to a third party, to be determined by the General Court, in order to examine a possible conflict of interests;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant relies on the following submissions in support of her action.

The applicant submits that she has a legal entitlement to an extension of her secondment as national expert as a result of the general principle of equality, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the prohibition of arbitrary action and Article 2 TEU.

The applicant complains in this regard that the non-extension of the secondment is based on an erroneous selection decision, or even on no selection decision at all.

The applicant also claims that her suspension from the staff committee is unlawful because no reasons were given, no hearing took place and no written decision was issued.

In addition, the applicant asserts a claim to have access to certain e-mails under Article 2 of Regulation No 1049/2001 (1). In this connection, she argues that official e-mails do not fall under the protection of personal data.

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

1

---