alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6437]

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a meeting of the International Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) to prepare for an April 19-30 meeting of International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) Study Group 13 (Future networks including mobile and Next Generation Networks).

                        The ITAC will meet by conference call to prepare advice for the U.S. government for the meeting of ITU-T Study Group 13 (Future networks including mobile and Next Generation Networks) on March 26, 10 a.m.—noon Eastern Time. Access to the conference bridge may be obtained on request to the ITAC Secretariat,                         *minardje@state.gov*                         or at (202) 647-3234. This meeting is open to the public and the public will have an opportunity to provide comments at this meeting. Any requests for reasonable accommodation should be made at least seven days before the meeting. All such requests will be considered; however, requests made after that date might not be possible to fulfill. Those desiring further information on this meeting may contact the Secretariat at                         *minardje@state.gov*                         or at (202) 647-3234.                    

Dated: March 3, 2010.

James G. Ennis,

International Communications & Information Policy, U.S. Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2010-4981 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7838 

To require the Commandant of the Coast Guard to submit a report on 

the implementation of certain recommendations for improving the Coast 

Guard housing program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2024 

Mr. KILMER (for himself and Mr. D’ESPOSITO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Commandant of the Coast Guard to submit 

a report on the implementation of certain recommendations for improving the Coast Guard housing program, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coast Guard Housing 

5 Affordability and Availability Improvement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON GAO RECOMMENDATIONS. 

7 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7838 IH

1 submit to Congress a report on the status of the imple2 mentation of the recommendations contained in the Gov3 ernment Accountability Office report published on Feb4 ruary 5, 2024, and titled ‘‘Coast Guard: Better Feedback 

5 Collection and Information Could Enhance Housing Pro6 gram’’ (GAO–24–106388). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      3,928,968
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                                      844,350,406
<DEPRECIATION>                              73,224,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              785,435,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 264,784,591
<COMMON>                                    352,573,676
<OTHER-SE>                                  (67,122,228)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                785,435,496
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,905,243
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,008,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          8,727,429
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             41,972,016
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         41,972,016
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                41,972,016
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .72

<FN>
Current  Assets and  Current  Liabilities  are not  separated  to  conform  with
industry standards.  Income is from rental income. There are no Sales or Cost of
Goods Sold.
</FN>

</TABLE>
§ 876.5530 Implantable transprostatic tissue retractor system. ( a ) *Identification.* An implantable transprostatic tissue retractor system is a prescription use device that consists of a delivery device and implant. The delivery device is inserted transurethrally and deploys the implant through the prostate. It is designed to increase prostatic urethral patency by providing prostate lobe tissue retraction while preserving the potential for future prostate procedures and is intended for the treatment of symptoms due to urinary outflow obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in men.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The elements of the device that may contact the patient must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 2 ) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the patient-contacting components of the device.
( 3 ) Performance data must support shelf life by demonstrating continued sterility of the device (of the patient-contacting components), package integrity, and device functionality over the requested shelf life.
( 4 ) Non-clinical testing data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Deployment testing must be conducted.
( ii ) Mechanical strength must be conducted.
( iii ) Resistance-to-degradation testing must be conducted.
( 5 ) Non-clinical testing must evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance environment.
( 6 ) In vivo testing must demonstrate safe and effective use, assess the impact of the implants on the ability to perform subsequent treatments, document the adverse event profile associated with clinical use, and demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Deployment testing must be conducted.
( ii ) Implant migration must be conducted.
( 7 ) Labeling must bear all information required for safe and effective use of the device, and must include: ( i ) Specific instructions, warnings, cautions, limitations, and the clinical training needed for the safe use of the device.
( ii ) Information on the patient population for which the device has been demonstrated to be effective.
( iii ) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters.
( iv ) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment.
( v ) An expiration date/shelf life.
( vi ) A detailed summary of the device- and procedure-related complications or adverse events pertinent to use of the device.
[79 FR 43249, July 25, 2014]
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GVC Venture Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard Zimmerman, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002        that, to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| November 7, 2008 | /s/ Bernard Zimmerman              |  |
|------------------|------------------------------------|--|
|                  | Bernard Zimmerman, President       |
|                  | (Principal Executive Officer) and  |
|                  | Treasurer (Principal Financial and |
|                  | Accounting Officer)                |

 

 

 

15
#### Jacob J. Kocian *v.*Albert T. Devito, Jr., et al.

*William D. Allen,*in support of the petition.

Submitted November 11

decided November 26, 1968

The petition by the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

IRS redesignated the following sections to appear below the undesignated center heading “Regulations Applicable to Certain Bonds Sold Prior to July 8, 1997” and preceding the undesignated center heading “Deductions for Personal Exemptions.” See 62 FR 25507 and 25513, May 9, 1997 for the specific sections involved in the redesignation.

#### §§ 1.148-1A-1.148-6A [Reserved]
**Exhibit 34.1**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of Directors 

Mechanics Bank 

Walnut Creek, California 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Mechanics Bank (the “Bank”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) for the asset-backed securities transactions for which the Bank acts as servicer ofautomotive retail installment sales contracts included in private and public securitizations sponsored by the Bank (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(ii)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii)and 1122(d)(4)(xv), for which the Bank has determined are not applicable to the activities performed with respect to the Platform. Appendix B to management’s report identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined bymanagement as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Bank’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testingof selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Bank processed those selected transactions and performed those servicingactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Bank during the period covered by the report. Our procedures were not designed todetect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Bank during the period covered by this report. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Bank complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2017 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Crowe Horwath LLP 

Sacramento, California 

March 29, 2018
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I,Cory J. Reed, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2015-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 

 

 
| Date: January 27,   2017 | By:    | */s/ Cory J. Reed*                            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Cory J. Reed                                  |
|                          |   | President of John Deere   Capital Corporation |
|                          |   | (as Servicer)                                 |

 

----
§ 1.304-5 Control. ( a ) *Control requirement in general.* Section 304(c)(1) provides that, for purposes of section 304, control means the ownership of stock possessing at least 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or at least 50 percent of the total value of shares of all classes of stock. Section 304(c)(3) makes section 318(a) (relating to constructive ownership of stock), as modified by section 304(c)(3)(B), applicable to section 304 for purposes of determining control under section 304(c)(1).
( b ) *Effect of section 304(c)(2)(B)* — ( 1 ) *In general.* In determining whether the control test with respect to both the issuing and acquiring corporations is satisfied, section 304(a)(1) considers only the person or persons that— ( i ) Control the issuing corporation before the transaction;
( ii ) Transfer issuing corporation stock to the acquiring corporation for property; and
( iii ) Control the acquiring corporation thereafter.
( 2 ) *Application.* Section 317 defines property to include money, securities, and any other property except stock (or stock rights) in the distributing corporation. However, section 304(c)(2)(B) provides a special rule to extend the relevant group of persons to be tested for control of both the issuing and acquiring corporations to include the person or persons that do not acquire property, but rather solely stock from the acquiring corporation in the transaction. Section 304(c)(2)(B) provides that if two or more persons in control of the issuing corporation transfer stock of such corporation to the acquiring corporation, and if the transferors are in control of the acquiring corporation after the transfer, the person or persons in control of each corporation include each of those transferors. Because the purpose of section 304(c)(2)(B) is to include in the relevant control group the person or persons that retain or acquire acquiring corporation stock in the transaction, only the person or persons transferring stock of the issuing corporation that retain or acquire any proprietary interest in the acquiring corporation are taken into account for purposes of applying section 304(c)(2)(B).
( 3 ) *Example.* This section may be illustrated by the following example. Example. (a) A, the owner of 20% of T's only class of stock, transfers that stock to P solely in exchange for all of the P stock. Pursuant to the same transaction, P, solely in exchange for cash, acquires the remaining 80% of the T stock from T's other shareholder, B, who is unrelated to A and P. (b) Although A and B together were in control of T (the issuing corporation) before the transaction and A and B each transferred T stock to P (the acquiring corporation), sections 304(a)(1) and (c)(2)(B) do not apply to B because B did not retain or acquire any proprietary interest in P in the transaction. Section 304(a)(1) also does not apply to A because A (or any control group of which A was a member) did not control T before the transaction and P after the transaction.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section is effective on January 20, 1994.
[T.D. 8515, 59 FR 2960, Jan. 20, 1994]
EXHIBIT
32
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger D. Dudley, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Roger D.
      Dudley________Roger
      D. DudleyPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, andChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)Dated
      August 14, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6820 Medical disposable scissors. ( a ) *Identification.* Medical disposable scissors are disposable type general cutting devices intended for medical purposes. This generic type of device does not include surgical scissors.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
[45 FR 69682, Oct. 21, 1980, as amended at 66 FR 38807, July 25, 2001]
# C_2014235EN.01002102.xml

| 21.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/21

---

Action brought on 17 April 2014 — Yoworld v OHIM — Nestlé (yogorino)

(Case T-246/14)

2014/C 235/29

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yoworld SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Tornato and D. Hazan, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 December 2013 given in Case R 115/2013-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 December 2013 given in Case R 115/2013-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘yogorino’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 35 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 4 36  536

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Earlier Community trade mark No 7 2 56  829

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal and annulled the contested decision in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR

Pleas in law:

---
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.3800 Motorized three-wheeled vehicle. ( a ) *Identification.* A motorized three-wheeled vehicle is a gasoline-fueled or battery-powered device intended for medical purposes that is used for outside transportation by disabled persons.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).