alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014253EN.01004901.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/49

---

Action brought on 29 May 2014 — Sequoia Capital Operations v OHIM — Sequoia Capital (SEQUOIA CAPITAL)

(Case T-369/14)

2014/C 253/64

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sequoia Capital Operations LLC (Menlo Park, United States) (represented by: F. Delord and A. Rendle, Solicitors, and G. Hollingworth, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sequoia Capital LLP (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 March 2014 in Case R 1457/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 March 2014 in Case R 1457/2013-4;

| — | Condemn the Office and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs of the proceedings before the Office and the General Court and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Condemn the Office and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs of the proceedings before the Office and the General Court and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘SEQUOIA CAPITAL’ for services in Classes 35, 36 and 42 — Community trade mark registration No 7 4 65  347

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Sequoia Capital LLP

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark No 4 1 02  141‘SEQUOIA’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 36

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: The request was upheld

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
In-Person Attendees: The Ice Maker Energy Model Meeting

Meeting Date: Thursday, June 19, 2014

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email

Armstrong, Ashley General Engineer U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585-0121 202-586-6590 202-586-4617 Ashley.Armstrong@ee.doe.gov

Bingham, CFSP, Scott Product Manager Follettice Corporation 801 Church Lane Nazareth PA 18040 610-252-7301 x128 

800-523-9361 x128

610-250-0169 sbingham@follettice.com

Burgos, Javier Senior Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 South Bedford Street, 

Suite 400

Burlington MA 01803 781-270-8371 781-270-0418 javier.burgos@navigant.com

Cymbalsky, John Supervisory Operations 

Research Analyst

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-1692 202-586-4617 john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov

Kent, Christopher Product Development 

Manager

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA)

1400 Pennsylvania Avenue 

NW

Washington DC 20460 202-343-9046 202-343-2200 kent.christopher@epa.gov

Kido, Michael K. General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue SW

Washington DC 20585-0121 202-586-8145 202-586-4116 michael.kido@hq.doe.gov

Lasecki, Tom Project Eneginner /Lab 

Manager

Scotsman Ice Systems 199 Scotsman Drive, PO 

Box 890

Fairfax SC 29827 803-632-4233 803-632-9633 tom.lasecki@scotsman-ice.com

McCarthy, Annie Senior Coordinator, 

Government Relations

Smith Bucklin 2025 M Street, NW, Suite 

800

Washington DC 20036 202-367-2320 N/A AMcCarthy@smithbucklin.com

Noll, Elizabeth Energy Efficiency 

Advocate

Natural Resources Defense Council 

(NRDC)

1152 15th Street, NW, 

Suite 300

Washington DC 20005 202-513-6277 202-289-1060 enoll@nrdc.org

Petrillo-Groh, Laura G. Senior Certification 

Engineer

Air-Conditioning, Heating, and 

Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)

2111 Wilson Boulevard, 

Suite 500

Arlington VA 22201-3001 703-600-0335 703-552-1942 lpetrillo-groh@ahrinet.org

Rawald, Doug N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Rivest, Michael C. Managing Director Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street, NW, 

Suite 700

Washington DC 20036 202-973-2426 202-973-2401 mrivest@navigant.com

Schaefer, Stephen Administrative 

Engineering Group, 

Group Leader

Hoshizaki America, Inc. 618 Highway 74 South Peachtree 

City

GA 30269 770-487-2331 x 1463 770-631-0138 stschaefer@hoshizaki.com

Shepherd, Amy Deputy General Counsel Air-Conditioning, Heating, and 

Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)

2111 Wilson Boulevard, 

Suite 500

Arlington VA 22201-3001 703-600-0330 703-562-1942 ashepherd@ahrinet.org

Spitz, Adam Senior Associate ICF International 1725 Eye Street, NW, Suite 

1000

Washington DC 20006 202-862-1226 202-862-1144 aspitz@icfi.com

Westphalen, Detlef Associate Director Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford Street

Suite 400

Burlington MA 01803-5154 781-270-8360 781-270-0418 detlef.westphalen@navigant.com
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7589 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications 

and Information, to conduct a study of the national 

security risks posed by consumer routers, modems, and 

devices that combine a modem and router, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7589 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Our Unse3 cure Technologies to Ensure Reliability and Security Act’’ 

4 or the ‘‘ROUTERS Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. STUDY OF NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS POSED BY 

6 CERTAIN ROUTERS AND MODEMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct a 

8 study of the national security risks posed by consumer 

9 routers, modems, and devices that combine a modem and 

10 router that are designed, developed, manufactured, or sup11 plied by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to the 

12 influence of a covered country. 

13 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year 

14 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

15 shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

16 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

17 Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a 

18 report on the results of the study conducted under sub19 section (a). 

20 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

21 (1) COVERED COUNTRY.—The term ‘‘covered 

22 country’’ means a country specified in section 

23 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code. 

24 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

25 the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the As-
3 

•HR 7589 EH

1 sistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications 

2 and Information. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7589 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce, acting 

poses. bine a modem and router, and for other pursumer routers, modems, and devices that comstudy of the national security risks posed by conCommunications and Information, to conduct a through the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
# Official Journal L 162/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 162 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6326 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 162

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6326 May 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/693 of 15 May 2020 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/694 of 18 May 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Tomme des Pyrénées’ (PGI) | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2020/695 of 19 May 2020 on the acceptance of a third State’s contribution to the European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) (EUTM RCA/1/2020) | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/693 of 15 May 2020 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/694 of 18 May 2020 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Tomme des Pyrénées’ (PGI)

4

DECISIONS

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2020/695 of 19 May 2020 on the acceptance of a third State’s contribution to the European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) (EUTM RCA/1/2020)

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Donaud E. Hunt

Decided June 25, 1968

The Supreme Court of the United States having, by its decision of June 10, 1968, vacated the judgment of this court dated February 21, 1967, and remanded the case to this court with direction for further consideration in the light of *Bruton*v. *United States,*391 U.S. 123, 88 S. Ct. 1620, 20 L. Ed. 2d 476, and *Roberts*v. *Russell,*392 U.S. 293, 88 S. Ct. 1921, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1100, it is ordered that counsel appear before this court on Tuesday, July 2, 1968, at 10 a.m. to be heard upon the terms and date for a reargument, if counsel desire a reargument, before further consideration of the appeal in this court.
607 P.2d 1

#### Carrol J. KOSIDLO, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard C. KOSIDLO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

No. 14631-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

Dec. 20, 1979.

Thikoll, Johnston & Rosen by Dennis A. Rosen, Tucson, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Ronald W. Sommer, Tucson, for appellee/cross-appellant.

PER CURIAM:

Richard C. Kosidlo brought this appeal seeking a review of certain provisions of a decree of dissolution, and his former wife, Carrol J. Kosidlo, cross-appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We accepted review. Opinion of the Court of Appeals, 125 Ariz.App. 32, 607 P.2d 15 (App.1979) disapproved in part.

We hold that the facts as stated by the Court of Appeals do not show an abandonment of the cross-appeal. So much of the opinion as relates to the cross-appeal is disapproved, and the record in this cause is ordered returned to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the cross-appeal on its merits.
TSCA Statutory Definitions Document , February 11, 2014 **Terms Defined** The terms “Manufacture,” “processor,” “process” and “distribute in commerce ” are defined in TSCA section 3. Entities engaged in hydraulic fracturing activities may be considered a manufacturer, processor, distributor in commerce or any combination of these, which would be relevant to those entities for the purposes of reporting.

TSCA §3 (7) “The term ‘‘manufacture’’ means to import into the customs territory of the United States (a s defined in general note 2 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), produce, or manufacture. ”

TSCA §3 (10 ) “ The term “processor” means any person who processes a chemical substance or mixture. “Process” means the preparation of a chemical substance or mixture, after its manufacture, for distribution in commerce

- (A) in the same form or physical state as, or in a different form or physical state from, that in which it was received by the person so preparing such substance or mixture, or (B ) as part of an article containing the chemical substance or mixture. ”
TSCA §3 (4 ) “The term ‘‘distribute in commerce’’ mean to sell, or the sale of, the substance, mixture, or article in commerce; to introduce or deliver for introduction into commerce, o r the introduction or delivery for introduction into commerce of, the substance, mixture, or article; or to hold, or the holding of, the substance, mixture, or article after its introduction into commerce .”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership  1989-1,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and
statement  of  operations contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000 and  is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         36,297
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  82,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,978
<PP&E>                                         3,096,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,588,015)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 627,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,078
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     622,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   627,154
<SALES>                                        63,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               64,454
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,460<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                28,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            28,177
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   28,177
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### § 1.401(k)-5 Special rules for mergers, acquisitions and similar events. [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           36149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3175479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3211628
<PP&E>                                         4373040
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2063108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12226608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1886614
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7162
<OTHER-SE>                                    10225933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12226608
<SALES>                                          29602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 29602
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   529390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 432174     
<INCOME-TAX>                                    152000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             280174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    280174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17

        *Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment which has been filed separately with the SEC.

(KOCH SUPPLY & TRADING LP LETTERHEAD)

                                          May 17, 2002    Revised June 14, 2002.


EOTT Energy Operating Ltd. Partnership
Attn:  Mr. Robert Sanford
P.O. Box 4666
Houston, Texas 77210-4666

     Re: Crude Oil Supply and Terminalling Agreement ("Agreement") dated
     December 1, 1998 by and between EOTT Energy Operating Limited Partnership
     ("EOTT") and Koch Supply & Trading, LP (as assignee of Koch Petroleum
     Group, L.P.) ("Koch"), EOTT Contract No. 37562, current reference number
     TS-02-1023015 as amended.

Dear Mr. Sanford:

This letter agreement shall serve to modify and amend section 6.2(e) of the
Agreement.

Upon execution of this letter by each party, the Agreement shall be amended to
include the following provision at the end of section 3.1:

            [*]

The foregoing amendment shall remain in effect through November 30, 2002.

Except as set forth above, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement, as
amended, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

Agreed to as of this 17th day of May 2002.

EOTT Energy Operating Limited Partnership
By EOTT Energy Corp., on behalf of its general partner
EOTT Energy General Partner, L.L.C.

By: /s/ Robert Sanford
    -------------------------
    Robert Sanford
    General Manager

Koch Supply & Trading, LP

By: /s/ James B. Urban
    -------------------------
    James B. Urban
    Vice President
39394.

#### CHALKLEY v. BROWN.

Decided April 4, 1962.

*A. B. Parker,*for plaintiff in error.

*William J. Wiggins,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff sued R. B. Brown and Ruby Brown on a note purportedly signed by both defendants, and on the call of the case for trial, after a continuance for cause was granted Ruby Brown, the plaintiff moved for a default judgment against R. B. Brown, which motion was orally overruled. The plaintiff then moved to strike the answer of the defendant R. B. Brown on two grounds and each of such motions was orally overruled, and the plaintiff now assigns error on such judgments adverse to him. No written judgment, nor recital that written judgment was entered, appears either in the bill of exceptions or the record. *Held:*

“What the judge orally declares is no judgment until it has been put in writing and entered as such. Since no judgment in writing overruling the demurrer to the petition was entered, the exception to the oral announcement of the trial judge presents no question for decision by this court, and the bill of exceptions must be dismissed. *McRae v.*Smith, 164 Ga. 23 (7) (137 SE 390); *Pulliam v. Jenkins,*157 Ga. 18, 22 (121 SE 679); *Foy v. McCrary,*157 Ga. 461 (121 SE 804); *Blakely Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Reynolds Brothers Lumber Co.,*173 Ga. 602, 609 (160 SE 775); *Hutcheson v. Hutcheson,*197 Ga. 603 (30 SE2d 107); *Hillcrest Memorial Park v. Heath,*85 Ga. App. 441 (1) (69 SE2d 643).” *Construction &*c. *Union, Local 246 v. Williams Construction Co.,*212 Ga. 691 (1) (95 SE2d 281). See also *Mid-State Homes Investment Corp. v. Wiggins,*217 Ga. 372 (2) (122 SE2d 106).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 0625 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2015

- NE

- 09

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

co st

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Replacement of GG

turbine blades with

serviceable parts 64 $ 5,440. 0

0 

### 28,765 $ 34,205.00 

### 1 $ 34,205.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 34,205



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@ $85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Anal ysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant r egulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Exp lanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :