alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5900 Preformed craniosynostosis strip. ( a ) *Identification.* A preformed craniosynostosis strip is a plastic strip used to cover bone edges of craniectomy sites (sites where the skull has been cut) to prevent the bone from regrowing in patients whose skull sutures are abnormally fused together.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2014 - 0531 Direct orate Identifier: 2014NM142AD

190 - 54 -A015 --- 6/23/14 190 - 54 -A015, R01 --- 6/26/14 190 - 54 -A015, R02 --- 6/27/14 190LIN - 54 - A006 --- 6/23/14 190LIN - 54 - A006, R01 --- 6/26/14 190LIN - 54 - 0006 - IN01 --- 7/7/14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Incl uded in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                              SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                        DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                                       FILED 09:00 AM 03/07/2003
                                                             030154673 - 3624214


                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                             BLACK WARRIOR GAS, L.P.



     THE  UNDERSIGNED,  being  the General Partner of BLACK WARRIOR GAS, L.P., a
limited  partnership formed pursuant to the provisions of Title 6, Chapter 17 of
the Delaware Code, does hereby make this Amendment to its Limited Partnership in
accordance  with  the  Delaware  Code  in  Article  3  as  follows:


     "3.     The  name  and  place  of  business  of  the  General  Partner  is:

                     NANG, Incorporated
                     1286 Homer Street, Fourth Floor
                     Vancouver, British Columbia
                     V6B  Y5
                     Canada."

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I  have  hereunto set my hand this 5th day of March,
2003.

                                    General Partner:

                                    NANG, Incorporated


                                    By:       "JIM GLAVAS"
                                        -----------------------------
                                         Jim Glavas, President


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                          16,997
<SECURITIES>                                    13,805
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,720
<INVENTORY>                                     91,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,047
<PP&E>                                          12,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,941
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,379
<SALES>                                         96,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,810
<CGS>                                           84,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (107)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,056
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,651
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, I, Michael Dinkins, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a) such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(b) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company and its subsidiaries as of and for the periods presented in such Form 10-Q.



|    |  |                                                                      |  |  |  |       |  |                 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | ----------------
|    |  |                                                                      |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Dinkins                                                  |  |  |  | Date: |  | October 31, 2006
|    |  | Michael Dinkins Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |       |  |
## I OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS I’ AUSTIN

**fleoaable WI**  **A. Davis**  Stat0 &*gbtr*r Stat4 Board of 3Ualth 

## Awtln, 2um
bar slraiionQrable ii.A. rnVL8, pEgI22^

C

Lionarab k’.A. Davis, paec 3

is.aAy,v1tb the rdopU0n doares at **th4** 

## Courtma sadh~alad~aluigemeyba opened on.Q uponorder OS a .Courbof ~30~4.. Upon reolotpt of BQW of eanulnient of crdapfioa;*o6ld R4$Lstrar oi Vftal btatlrticr -31 rc8tors tha origina napw al tha ah&Ad rpd ?.he Aolwl QP hi.8

neturol prrent8 or pzwlt to t&a rcacmi of birth OS euch ahild. Pravldwl furSher that e4optIonrarba uacler sr28tlng 18u pior to tize p8r98g4 of W8 Aot, wey be Ngf8t4F44 *it& the Bwoau OS VAtal Statiotlosupera svor~ appli68tm4 of sither adaptlvoparent or guardlea of the aQepW3 **ouM, shou**  **th4 Aam**  **on4 eddr-48894**  OS the aatula parantai ff knmm, or of the ahibId'next k&n, She Qate of bLrth aa4 thenoptQ OS ruab ahiLd beforeud 

### attar l t%qtimr, the nma8 an4 ad4romses of foeter goats, to@hdmX’ Wi+& proof Of adopt;lC#, either bT cartLI;edcopy c# the reatml of the aStidwit OS aQoptiori,

or the Court or&r OS auoptlon.’ 'phfo58 the only prevtsror~ ot our Mv permlttlag a roglstrettonsuah 810the on@ aolrt@apUtsd**by the**  oertlfiaats eubaltte4. TtaWwly cont45plaScr a legal 44aptio~, anblays doVn apeaitio **awquirswsnt;s** whzoh Pwt be fulSil&d prior to the regZetration. '&a certifti64t,o rubritteddoe8 not SuUiU thaw r4wlrom6rst8, It L8 not 

### a aertifisd 

### oupy of an osiw of sdoptiOA, **&OF 18**  it **0** SVOl-A **8ppli6asiOA at**  **4~thrr** adO<~VO m4At or guar<llm **OS** ths 846pteQ saJild, **8hoViag** "?&w zuk@M aad addre8w8 QS the mtural parsxitofs, if Imaun, ar of the awl4@8 ~clxtk3.q the date of bLrtb aad tha nbm of rush ahIldBISore and after adoption,the wunao and Oddro88osOX Somterpawnts, together **With** proof oi adoptlea."

Xt 1s tbercrfars

ow opinion that **t&4** birth aert%ffoote **suba+tted should**  Aot be noospted by tha StateReg.IrtHw En lieu of the osrtlfled aopy of e4aptioo Qooree provtded for bg 6aiQ pknagrqih26 of Rule &7a, ktlalo 4477, V. R. C. f).

ln vlcw of our anuwur to your Sir& gwrtian, it becozeu unnecessary to answer ths second.

## 159
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.5420 *Alpha*-1-glycoproteins immunological test system. ( a ) *Identification.* An *alpha-*1-glycoproteins immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques *alpha-*1-glycoproteins (a group of plasma proteins found in the *alpha-*1 group when subjected to electrophoresis) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of specific *alpha-*1-glycoproteins may aid in the diagnosis of collagen (connective tissue) disorders, tuberculosis, infections, extensive malignancy, and diabetes.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 65 FR 2312, Jan. 14, 2000]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302**

 

I, John V. Oyler, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of BeiGene, Ltd.;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 30, 2016

 

 
| /s/ John V. Oyler                      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| John V. Oyler                          |   |
| Chief Executive Officer   and Chairman |   |

 

----
**Exhibit32**

## **CERTIFICATION**

**The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:**

(1)                              The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB/A for the period ended April 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                              The information contained in the accompanying Reportfairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:  | January 29, 2007 |   |                                  | /s/ Rodney A. Young |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   |             |   | Rodney A. Young                       |
|   |             |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |             |   |                                  |
|   |             |   |                                  |
| Date:  | January 29, 2007 |   |                                  | /s/ Dale H. Johnson |   |
|   |             |   | Dale H. Johnson                       |
|   |             |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         334,442
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,077,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                 7,034,073
<INVENTORY>                                     77,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,822,784
<PP&E>                                       1,539,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                 820,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,220,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,002,181
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,232
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,220,190
<SALES>                                      4,092,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,530,623
<CGS>                                        4,253,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,253,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,553,685
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             179,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,722,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (644,247)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,078,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,078,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [Docket No. USCG-2007-0115]
          - RIN 1625-AA87

### Correction

Rule document E8-11863 was inadvertently published in the Proposed Rules section of the issue of May 28, 2008, beginning on page 30560. It should have appeared in the Rules and Regulations section.

[FR Doc. 2010-517 Filed 1-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
IB 

Union Calendar No. 726 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7983 

[Report No. 118–889] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to define the term free trade 

agreement for purposes of the clean vehicle credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2024 

Mrs. FISCHBACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

DECEMBER 17, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 15, 2024] 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7983 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to define 

the term free trade agreement for purposes of the clean 

vehicle credit. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7983 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Executive Over5 reach on Trade Agreements Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FREE TRADE AGREEMENT DEFINED FOR PURPOSES 

7 OF CLEAN VEHICLE CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30D(e)(1) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following new subparagraph: 

11 ‘‘(C) FREE TRADE AGREEMENT.—For pur12 poses of subparagraph (A)(i)(II), the term ‘free 

13 trade agreement’ means an international agree14 ment approved by Congress that eliminates du15 ties and other restrictive regulations of commerce 

16 on substantially all the trade between the United 

17 States and 1 or more other countries.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this 

19 section shall apply to vehicles placed in service after the 

20 date of the enactment of this Act. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 726 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7983 

[Report No. 118–889] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

poses of the clean vehicle credit. define the term free trade agreement for purDECEMBER 17, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
39300.

#### GLOVER v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted of the offense of remaining in a seat on a bus operated as a common carrier of passengers for hire other than the seat assigned by the driver in charge of such bus. See *Code*§§ 18-208, 18-9904. The defendant’s motion for new trial was denied, and the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court. That court transferred the case to this court and held that no constitutional question was properly raised, and that the law of the case, that such statute was not violative of the constitution, was established by the procedure followed by the defendant in the trial court. See *Glover v. State,*217 Ga. 401 (122 SE2d 744).

The sole question for decision by this court, in view of the decision by the Supreme Court, supra, is whether there was evidence sufficient to support a conviction. The evidence sup*333ported a finding that the defendant remained in a seat other than the one assigned to him by the operator in charge of such bus in violation of the above-cited statute. The trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for new trial.

Decided January 18, 1962

Rehearing denied February 6,1962.

*D. L. Hollowell, H. T. Ward,*for plaintiff in error.

*Clarence H. Clay, Jr., Solicitor, Harry F. Thompson, Assistant Solicitor,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
39382.

#### WILLERSON v. THE STATE.

Decided April 4, 1962.

*Hamilton & Anderson, George Anderson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Chastine Parker, Solicitor-General,*contra.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted for manufacturing whisky. His motion for new trial, based on the usual general grounds only, was overruled and he now assigns error on such judgment adverse to him. The evidence adduced on the trial of the case showed that the defendant was arrested at the site of the still, that he had been around such still for at least twenty or thirty minutes, that he walked back and forth between the still (which was in operation) , and a water pump (their water was being pumped from a spring to the still), that he was heard picking up jars, and was seen leaning over a barrel containing mash or whisky, and upon being apprehended gave warning to two other men who were engaged in operating the still so that they could flee. *Held:*

The evidence authorized the verdict and whether the defendant’s explanation as to his presence at the still was sufficient to acquit him was a question for the jury and such question was decided adversely to his contentions. See *Chester v. State,*74 Ga. App. 667 (2) (41 SE2d 162); *Blanton v. State,*91 Ga. App. 406 (85 SE2d 830); *Mercer v. State,*100 Ga. App. 196 (1) (110 SE2d 558).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*