alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > H.R. 28; the Federal Reserve Accountability Act of 1993

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, 1977-1995					 and 	One Hundred Third Congress, 1993-1995. 						*H.R. 28; the Federal Reserve Accountability Act of 1993 : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, First Session, October 27, 1993*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										October 27, 1993,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1156,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**Exhibit 34.2**

** **

** **

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

The Board of Directors 

U.S. Bank National Association

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended October 31, 2017, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by  them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended October 31, 2017, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 22, 2017

 

----
#### Richard Jameson et al. *v.*Patrick Brinkley et al.

Argued June 4

decided June *4,*1968

*Manuel B. Clark,*for the appellee (defendant Dignazio).

*William V. Dworski,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

The motion by the defendant Richard P. Dignazio to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 13, 2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: EPA Region 1

SUBJECT: November 13, 2014, Meeting with Massachusetts State Staff Regarding Proposed 

Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on November 13, 2014

to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. Discussion covered the 

energy efficiency calculations and integration of load growth over time. 

ATTENDEES (all by phone):

Massachusetts: 

Seth Federspiel

Alissa Whiteman

EPA: 

Shutsu Wong

Cynthia Greene

John Moskal

Bob McConnell

Joe Bryson

Beth Conlin

Questions from the state are attached.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 15 0 . LUI S E. ROJ AS v . THE STATE.

Lu i s E. Ro

jas

, wh i l e rep res en t ed by co u n s el

, was co n v i ct e d o f m u l t i p l e fel o n i es

i n M ay 2 0 1 7

. Th at sam e m o n t h, Ro jas fi l ed a p ro s e n o t i ce o f ap peal

. Am on g o t h er

t h i n g s t h erei n , Ro

jas s t a t e s t hat h e w i s hes t o b e ap p o in t ed co u n sel fo r p u rp o s es o f

p u rs i n g a d i rect ap p eal

. W e th u s REM AND t h i s cas e fo r t he t ri al co u rt ’ s co n s i d er a t i o n o f wh et h er

Ro jas is en t i t l ed t o b e ap p o in t ed co u n s el

. 1 Up o n en t ry o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s ru l i n g , t h i s

ca s e s h al l b e tran s m i t t ed t o t h i s Co u rt an d re-d o ck et ed o n t h e o ri g i n al n o t i ce o f

ap p eal

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 See g en eral l y Tr a u t h v. S t a t e , 2 9 5 G a. 8 7 4

, 8 7 5

- 8 7 6 (1 ) (2 0 1 4 ) (“ [I] t i s b ey o n d qu es t i o n t h at an i n d i g en t h as t h e ri gh t t o ap p o i n t ed co u n s el t o as s i st h i m o n d i rect ap p eal ; an d

, an i n d i v i du al d es i ri n g an ap p eal n eed n o t

, o n ce a res p o ns i b l e s t at e

au t h o ri t y k n o w s of t he des ire t o ap p eal an d k n o ws of t h e s t at u s o f i n d i g en cy ,

s p eci fi cal l y req u es t ap p o i n t m en t o f ap pel l at e c o u n s el

. ”) (ci t at i o n s an d pu n ct u at i o n

o m it t ed ). October 13, 2017

10/13/2017
# C_2014135EN.01005502.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/55

---

Action brought on 25 February 2014 — I Castellani v OHIM — Chomarat (Device of a circle)

(Case T-137/14)

2014/C 135/72

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: I Castellani Srl (Meldola, Italy) (represented by: M. Caramelli, F. Boscariol de Roberto, I. Gatto and D. Martucci, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Compagnie Chomarat (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 December 2013 given in Case R 1001/2012-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 December 2013 given in Case R 1001/2012-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: The figurative mark representing a device of a circle for goods in Class 19 — Community trade mark registration No 2 844 033

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: It revoked the registration of Community trade mark No 2 844 033

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(2) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
(and to all references to our Firm), as it relates to VoiceStream Wireless
Corporation and Subsidiaries, included in or made a part of this registration
statement.

                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Seattle, Washington
December 27, 1999
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



Thomas A. Borner, President and Chief Executive
Officer and Robert J. Halloran, Jr., Executive Vice President and Treasurer of PB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) each
certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 and that to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                        | /s/ THOMAS A.
BORNER                                                                                                     
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  October 25, 2019 | Thomas A. Borner                                                                                                         
|                        | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                    
|                        |                                                                                                                          
|                        | /s/ ROBERT J.
                                               HALLORAN,
                                               JR.
|Date: October 25, 2019  | Robert J. Halloran, Jr.                                                                                                  
|                        | Executive Vice President and Treasurer                                                                                   



The purpose of this statement is solely
to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to PB Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by PB Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
"Jane Staveley" < j staveley@exponent.com> 02/09/2011 12:20 PM To EHPV-Program-Submissions@EPA

cc "Franz, Christina" <Christina

_ Franz@americanchemistry.com>, "Ralph Parod" <ralph.parod@basf.com>, "David A Cortes" bcc Subject Revised test plan and robust summaries for 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (CAS No. 89-00-9)

On behalf of BASF Corporation, the attached submission is made under the EHPV Program. A revised test plan and revised robust summaries are hereby submitted for 2,3- p yridinedicarboxylic acid (CAS No. 89-00-9). As explained in the cover letter, the robust summaries have been entered into HPVIS but a pdf file is attached for your convenience.

Please contact me if you have any problems with the submission or any questions.

Thank you.

Jane Staveley Senior Managing Scientist

E x ponent ® 1000 Centre Green Way, Suite 200 Cary, N C 27513 Phone: 919-228-6480 Mobile: 919-961-0987 Fax: 919-228-6501 Email: j staveley@exponent.com

www.exponent.com- PDC submission Letter

_ 2-9-11.pdf - PDC Revised test plan

_ 2-9-11.pdf - PDC revised HPVIS submission 2-8-11.pdf
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3365 Multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures. ( a ) *Identification.* A multiplex nucleic acid assay for identification of microorganisms and resistance markers from positive blood cultures is a qualitative in vitro device intended to simultaneously detect and identify microorganism nucleic acids from blood cultures that test positive by Gram stain or other microbiological stains. The device detects specific nucleic acid sequences for microorganism identification as well as for antimicrobial resistance. This device aids in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections when used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. However, the device does not replace traditional methods for culture and susceptibility testing.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's guideline document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guideline: Multiplex Nucleic Acid Assay for Identification of Microorganisms and Resistance Markers from Positive Blood Cultures.” For availability of the guideline document, see § 866.1(e).
[80 FR 30154, May 27, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 96 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 96

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                   relative to campaign expenditures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 20 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

  Mr. Roth introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                   relative to campaign expenditures.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein)  That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes and part of the Constitution if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within the seven-year period following the date of submission to the 
States for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Congress may by law establish reasonable limitations on campaign 
expenditures made by any person with respect to the candidacy of any 
person for the Office of President, Vice President, Senator, 
Representative, or any other office within its jurisdiction. The 
several States may by law establish reasonable limitations on campaign 
expenditures made by any person with respect to the candidacy of any 
person for any other office within their respective jurisdiction.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American HealthChoice, Inc.  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the  period ending December 31, 2005 as  filed
 with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
 "Report"), I, Dr.  J. W.  Stucki, Chief  Executive Officer  of the  Company,
 certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as  adopted pursuant to S 906 of  the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

           (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements of  Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2)  The information contained in  the Report fairly presents,  in
           all material  respects,  the  financial condition  and  result  of
           operations of the Company.



 /s/ Dr. J. W. Stucki


 Dr. J. W. Stucki

 Chief Executive Officer

 February 14, 2006
### NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00415

- C R



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

EDDIE GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas

.



## ORDE R TO FILE APPELL EE ’S BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Th is cause i s before the Court on appell ee 's amended third motion for extension

of time to file the brief

. Appell ee ’s brief was originally due to be filed on August 31, 2020

,

and th e Court previously granted appell ee two extensions for the filing of appell ee ’s brief

in this cause.2 The Court, having f ully examined and considered appell ee 's amended third motion

for extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in this cause,

is of the opinion exigent circumstances exist, and in the interest of justice, appell ee ’ s

amended third mot ion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted. Accordingly,

appellee’s amended third motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. The

Court looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by counsel ’ s failure to have filed a brief

in this matter

.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Honorable Luis A. Gonzalez , counsel for

appell ee , file the appellate brief with this Court on or before March 1 , 202 1

. No further

motions to extend will be entertained.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

3rd day of December , 2020.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09614**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09614\09614_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09614\09614_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09614\09614_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09614\09614_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09614\09614_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09614\09614_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09614\Certification Statement_09614.pdf Plant certification statement 09614\Follow up\09614_Aerial Views Niagara Generation.docx Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 09614\Follow up\NIGEN Part C Final.xlsx Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 09614\Follow up\Part A upddated 01-31-11 (Received 02-16-2011).xlsx Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 09614\Follow up\Part A upddated 01-31-11.xlsx Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 09614\Follow up\RE Questions for Steam Electric Questionnaire (Niagara Generation - Plant ID 09614)_01.31.2011.rtf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 09614\Follow up\RE Questions for Steam Electric Questionnaire (Niagara Generation - Plant ID 09614)_02.17.2011_1.rtf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 09614\Follow up\RE Questions for Steam Electric Questionnaire (Niagara Generation - Plant ID 09614)_02.17.2011_2.rtf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey. x 09614\09614_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09614\09614_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Pearce, commissioner, *et al. v.*Bembry *et al.; et vice versa.*

Nos. 8232, 8233.

January 12, 1932.

Russell, C. J.

1. This was a proceeding to compel the board of education of Pulaski County to pay certain vouchers issued by the board to teachers and others, for services rendered to the board. It does not appear that the board had in hand any funds which could be appropriated to these payments at the time the proceeding was instituted. It does appear that the board may in future receive funds from appropriations made by the State. The right to invoke the aid of a court to compel by mandamus the performance of an official duty can not, as a general rule, arise until the officer is in actual default. 18 R. C. L. 129, § 36. "“To warrant the relief, however, the right whose enforcement is sought must be a complete, and not merely an inchoate right.” *Mattox*v. *Board of Education,*148 *Ga.*577, 581 (97 S. E. 532, 5 A. L. R. 568). Eor this reason we reverse the judgment making the mandamus absolute.

2. In view of the foregoing ruling, a discussion of the exceptions presented in the cross-bill of exceptions is obviated.

*Judgment reversed on main bill of exceptions. Writ of error on cross-bill dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*92
      *Hal Lawson*and *D. R.*Pearce, for plaintiffs in error.

*Lawson &*Ware, contra.