alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7987 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7987

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require plain language and the inclusion of key words in covered 
   notices that are clear, concise, and accessible to small business 
                   concerns, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Plain Language in Contracting Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESSIBILITY AND CLARITY IN COVERED NOTICES FOR SMALL BUSINESS 
              CONCERNS.

    (a) In General.--Each covered notice shall be written--
            (1) in a manner that is clear, concise, and accessible to a 
        small business concern; and
            (2) in a manner consistent, to the extent practicable, with 
        the Federal plain language guidelines established pursuant to 
        the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (5 U.S.C. 301 note).
    (b) Inclusion of Key Words in Covered Notices.--Each covered notice 
shall, to the maximum extent practicable, include key words in the 
description of the covered notice such that a small business concern 
seeking contract opportunities using the single governmentwide point of 
entry described under section 1708 of title 41, United States Code, can 
easily identify and understand such covered notice.
    (c) Rulemaking.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration shall issue rules to carry out this section.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Covered notice.--The term ``covered notice'' means a 
        notice pertaining to small business concerns published by a 
        Federal agency on the single Government-wide point of entry 
        described under section 1708 of title 41, United States Code.
            (2) Small business act definitions.--The terms ``Federal 
        agency'' and ``small business concern'' have the meanings given 
        those terms, respectively, in section 3 of the Small Business 
        Act (15 U.S.C. 632).

SEC. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO.

    No additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act or the amendments made by this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7987

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To require plain language and the inclusion of key words in covered 
   notices that are clear, concise, and accessible to small business 
                   concerns, and for other purposes.
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7582 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work authorization to an alien found to have been unlawfully present in the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2024 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work authorization to an alien found to have been 

unlawfully present in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Protection for 

5 American Workers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN WORK AUTHORIZA7 TIONS. 

8 Effective beginning on the date of the enactment of 

9 this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security is prohibited 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7582 IH

1 from granting a work authorization to an alien who has 

2 been finally determined, in a valid immigration proceeding 

3 during which due process was afforded, to have been at 

4 any time unlawfully present in the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Nov 01, 2015 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 12047 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 

11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket FAA-2015-1598-0002

Dear Sir or Madam; 

4Prop Production was issued an Exemption numbered 12142 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the 

purpose of conducting aerial photography and inspections. 4Prop Production herby requests an 

amendment to the Exemption to allow an additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully 

complies with the conditions of the Exemption. 

4Prop Production wishes to operate a DJI Inspire PRO UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will 

be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. 

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another type of 

unmanned aerial vehicle, 4Prop Production respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice 

does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. 

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment

to the Exemption. 

Sincerely yours, 

Keith Whitehead

Co-Owner and Operator

4 Prop Production

25915 Timberline dr

San Antonio, Texas 78260

keith@4propproduction.com
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew
Kang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

President and Chief Executive OfficerSantander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor(senior officer in charge of securitization of
the depositor)Date:

March 30, 2017
§ 1.269-1 Meaning and use of terms. As used in section 269 and §§ 1.269-2 through 1.269-7: ( a ) *Allowance.* The term *allowance* refers to anything in the internal revenue laws which has the effect of diminishing tax liability. The term includes, among other things, a deduction, a credit, an adjustment, an exemption, or an exclusion.
( b ) *Evasion or avoidance.* The phrase *evasion or avoidance* is not limited to cases involving criminal penalties, or civil penalties for fraud.
( c ) *Control.* The term *control* means the ownership of stock possessing at least 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote, or at least 50 percent of the total value of shares of all classes of stock of the corporation. For control to be “acquired on or after October 8, 1940”, it is not necessary that all of such stock be acquired on or after October 8, 1940. Thus, if A, on October 7, 1940, and at all times thereafter, owns 40 percent of the stock of X Corporation and acquires on October 8, 1940, an additional 10 percent of such stock, an acquisition within the meaning of such phrase is made by A on October 8, 1940. Similarly, if B, on October 7, 1940, owns certain assets and transfers on October 8, 1940, such assets to a newly organized Y Corporation in exchange for all the stock of Y Corporation, an acquisition within the meaning of such phrase is made by B on October 8, 1940. If, under the facts stated in the preceding sentence, B is a corporation, all of whose stock is owned by Z Corporation, then an acquisition within the meaning of such phrase is also made by Z Corporation on October 8, 1940, as well as by the shareholders of Z Corporation taken as a group on such date, and by any of such shareholders if such shareholders as a group own 50 percent of the stock of Z on such date.
( d ) *Person.* The term *person* includes an individual, a trust, an estate, a partnership, an association, a company or a corporation.
[T.D. 6595, 27 FR 3596, Apr. 14, 1962, as amended by T.D. 8388, 57 FR 345, Jan. 6, 1992]
#### § 1.401(a)-16 Limitations on benefits and contributions under qualified plans.

A trust will not be a qualified trust and a plan will not be a qualified plan if the plan provides for benefits or contributions which exceed the limitations of section 415. Section 415 and the regulations thereunder provide rules concerning these limitations on benefits and contributions.

[T.D. 7748, 46 FR 1696, Jan. 7, 1981]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LASER
RECORDING SYSTEMS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                               1,121
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,121
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       1,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         7,408,910
<OTHER-SE>                                      (7,417,789)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         1,121
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         9
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    16,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (16,763)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (16,763)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 112 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 112

Urging sanctions to be imposed against the Burmese government, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                May 24 (legislative day, April 19), 1993

 Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. Simon, Mr. Pell, Mr. Helms, Mr. Biden, 
Mr. Jeffords, Mr. McConnell, Mr. D'Amato, and Mr. Kerrey) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Urging sanctions to be imposed against the Burmese government, and for 
                            other purposes.

Whereas the military junta in Burma known as the State Law and Order Restoration 
        Council (in this preamble referred to as the ``SLORC'') brutally 
        suppressed peaceful democratic demonstrations in September 1988;
Whereas the Senate of the United States has repeatedly condemned and continues 
        its condemnation of the SLORC;
Whereas the SLORC does not represent the people of Burma, since the people of 
        Burma gave the National League for Democracy a clear victory in the 
        election of May 27, 1990;
Whereas the SLORC has held Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, a leader of the National League 
        for Democracy and the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize for 1991, under 
        house arrest since July 1989;
Whereas the United Nations Human Rights Commission unanimously adopted on March 
        5, 1993, a resolution deploring the human rights situation in Burma and 
        the continued arrest of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi; and
Whereas on March 12, 1992, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate 
        unanimously stated that (1) the SLORC does not represent the Burmese 
        people and should transfer power to the winners of the 1990 elections, 
        (2) United States military attaches should be withdrawn from Burma, and 
        (3) the United States should oppose United Nations Development Program 
        funding for Burma: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the President, 
the Secretary of State, and other United States Government 
representatives should--
            (1) seek the immediate release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi from 
        arrest and the transfer of power to the winners of the 1990 
        elections in Burma; and
            (2) encourage the adoption by the United Nations Security 
        Council of an arms embargo and other sanctions against the 
        regime of the State Law and Order Restoration Council in Burma.
    Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to the President and the Secretary of State.

                                 <all>
```
# C_2014431EN.01004402.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/44

---

Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition v OHIM — H. Young Holdings (animal)

(Case T-728/14)

(2014/C 431/69)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition (New Brunswick, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H. Young Holdings plc (Newbury, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘animal’ — Community trade mark No 2 8 24  548

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 July 2014 in Case R 2058/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
AFS-11-018-E November 22, 2010 Exemption No. 10169 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1061

Mr. Gerald Yagen

President

Aviation Institute of Maintenance

4455 South Boulevard Virginia Beach, VA 23452-1159

Dear Mr. Yagen:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 13, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Technical Education Services, Inc., d.b.a. Aviation Institute of Maintenance (AIM) (operating under Air Agency Certificate X88T58K) for an exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow AIM to allow students enrolled in its part 147 aviation maintenance technician school to take the aviation mechanic written tests (aviation mechanic general (AMG), aviation mechanic airframe (AMA), and aviation mechanic powerplant (AMP)) after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum, prior to meeting the experience requirements of § 65.77.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to AIM.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 8845 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that testing immediately after learning was a universally accepted instructional2

principle that reinforces learning. Therefor e, we allow the petitioner to test students immediately after successfully completing the general curriculum but before the requirements of § 65.77.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant of exemption;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Technical Education Services, Inc., d.b.a. Aviation Institute of Maintenance (AIM) (operating under Air Agency Certificate X88T58K) an exemption from 14 CFR § 65.75(a) to the extent necessary to allow students enrolled in its part 147 aviation maintenance technician school to take the aviation mechanic written tests (AMG, AMA, and AMP) after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum, prior to meeting the experience requirements of § 65.77.

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
[J-16-2015] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellant 

 v. 

TIFFANY LEE BARNES, 

 Appellee 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

111 MAP 2014 

Appeal from the Order of the Superior 

Court dated 1/15/14, reconsideration 

denied 3/27/14 at No. 91 EDA 2013 

affirming the order of the Court of 

Common Pleas of Monroe County, 

Criminal Division, at No. CP-45-1473-2012 

dated 12/5/12 

ARGUED: March 11, 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM DECIDED: August 25, 2015 

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2015, the Order of the Superior Court is 

AFFIRMED. 

 Mr. Justice Eakin files a dissenting statement in which Mr. Justice Stevens joins. 

 Mr. Justice Stevens files a dissenting statement.
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.1120 Electronic noise generator for audiometric testing. ( a ) *Identification.* An electronic noise generator for audiometric testing is a device that consists of a swept frequency generator, an amplifier, and an earphone. It is intended to introduce a masking noise into the non-test ear during an audiometric evaluation. The device minimizes the non-test ear's sensing of test tones and signals being generated for the ear being tested.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 874.9.
[51 FR 40389, Nov. 6, 1986, as amended at 84 FR 71813, Dec. 30, 2019]
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

5 filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 30,219 

10 J. TYRONE RIORDAN,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY

13 James Waylon Counts, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellee

17 J. Tyrone Riordan

18 Carrizozo, NM

19 Pro Se Appellant

20 MEMORANDUM OPINION

21 FRY, Chief Judge.

22 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice.

23 No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, and the time for doing

24 so has expired. DISMISSED.
2
3

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.

2 

3 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

4 WE CONCUR:

5 

6 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

7 

8 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge