alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7874 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7874

 To terminate the United States-People's Republic of China Income Tax 
 Convention if the People's Liberation Army initiates an armed attack 
                            against Taiwan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2024

  Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas (for himself, Mrs. Spartz, Mr. Davis of 
 North Carolina, and Mr. Carson) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To terminate the United States-People's Republic of China Income Tax 
 Convention if the People's Liberation Army initiates an armed attack 
                            against Taiwan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONDITIONAL TERMINATION OF THE UNITED STATES-PEOPLE'S 
              REPUBLIC OF CHINA INCOME TAX CONVENTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall provide 
written notice to the People's Republic of China through diplomatic 
channels of the United States intent to terminate the United States-The 
People's Republic of China Income Tax Convention, done at Beijing April 
30, 1984, and entered into force January 1, 1987, as provided by 
Article 28 of the Convention, not later than 30 days after the 
President notifies the Secretary of the Treasury that the People's 
Liberation Army has initiated an armed attack against the Republic of 
China (commonly known as ``Taiwan'').
    (b) Congressional Notification.--The President shall submit written 
notification of a termination described in subsection (a) to--
            (1) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
            (2) the Committee on Finance of the Senate;
            (3) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
        Representatives; and
            (4) the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of 
        Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6740 Vacuum-powered body fluid suction apparatus. ( a ) *Identification.* A vacuum-powered body fluid suction apparatus is a device used to aspirate, remove, or sample body fluids. The device is powered by an external source of vacuum. This generic type of device includes vacuum regulators, vacuum collection bottles, suction catheters and tips, connecting flexible aspirating tubes, rigid suction tips, specimen traps, noninvasive tubing, and suction regulators (with gauge).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 880.9.
[45 FR 69682, Oct. 21, 1980, as amended at 63 FR 59229, Nov. 3, 1998]
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely
in connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Retractable Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10KSB-A for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned Thomas J. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas W. Cowan, Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



September 10, 2004



/s/ Thomas J. ShawTHOMAS J. SHAWPRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, ANDCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/ Douglas W.
CowanDOUGLAS W. COWANVICE PRESIDENT ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Exhibit 35.3

OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

I, Karen Montbach, a
Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2015 (the Agreement), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,
as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer and custodian, LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the
Certificate Administrator), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following:

1. A review of the
Companys activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2015 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2015, the Company has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an
authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.

Date: February 26, 2016



Citibank, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachName:

Karen MontbachTitle:

Managing Director


CGCMT 2015-P1
#### § 1.1313(a)-2 Closing agreement as a determination.

A determination may take the form of a closing agreement authorized by section 7121. Such an agreement may relate to the total tax liability of the taxpayer for a particular taxable year or years or to one or more separate items affecting such liability. A closing agreement becomes final for the purpose of this section on the date of its approval by the Commissioner.

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12036, Nov. 26, 1960]
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.3470 Intracardiac patch or pledget made of polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, or polytetrafluoroethylene. ( a ) *Identification.* An intracardiac patch or pledget made of polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate, or polytetrafluoroethylene is a fabric device placed in the heart that is used to repair septal defects, for patch grafting, to repair tissue, and to buttress sutures.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8060 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8060

      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require the 
notification of appropriate elected officials prior to the placement of 
                          refugees in a State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2024

 Mr. Van Orden (for himself, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Weber of 
Texas, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Tiffany, and Mr. Mast) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require the 
notification of appropriate elected officials prior to the placement of 
                          refugees in a State.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Contacting All Local Legislators 
Act'' or the ``CALL Act''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION OF ELECTED OFFICIALS PRIOR TO REFUGEE 
              RESETTLEMENT.

    Section 412(a)(2)(D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1522(a)(2)(D)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``shall, consistent'' and inserting the 
        following: ``shall--
                            ``(i) consistent'';
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``; 
        and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) prior to making such a placement, 
                        notify the Senators representing the State, the 
                        Member of the House of Representatives 
                        representing the district of the placement 
                        within the State, and the applicable State 
                        legislative elected officials.''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1405 Ophthalmic trial lens set. ( a ) *Identification.* An ophthalmic trial lens set is a device that is a set of lenses of various dioptric powers intended to be handheld or inserted in a trial frame for vision testing to determine refraction.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
[52 FR 33355, Sept. 2, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 1124, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38811, July 25, 2001]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1122

___________

Ralph T. Wilmas, Jr., *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

Ricky Rollins; Alex A. Mason; *

Cornelius Williams, Jr.; Henry French, *

*

Appellants, *

*

John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and *

All Others Similarly Situated, *

*

Plaintiff, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Alvin Dudley; Samuel Smith; Lonnie * Eastern District of Missouri.

Wolford, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellants, *

*

v. *

*

Matt Blunt, Governor of *

Missouri, Official and Individual *

Capacity; Steve Long, Missouri Parole *

Board Chairman, Official and *

Individual Capacity; Wayne Crump, *

Parole Board Member, Official and *

Individual Capacity; Ansel Card, *

Parole Board Member, Official and *

Individual Capacity; Penny Hubbard, *

Parole Board Member, Official and *

Individual Capacity; Robert Robinson, *
-2-

Parole Board Member, Official and *

Individual Capacity; Reid Forrester, *

Parole Board Member, Official and *

Individual Capacity; All and Present *

and Future Parole Board Chairmans and *

Parole Board Members; Unknown *

Avery, Institutional Parole Officer, *

NECC, Official and Individual *

Capacity; Unknown Helkey, *

Institutional Parole Officer, NECC, *

Official and Individual Capacity; *

Unknown Weatherford, Institutional *

Parole Officer, NECC, Official and *

Individual Capacity; Unknown Woods, *

Institutional Parole Officer, NECC, *

Official and Individual Capacity; All *

Present Statewide Institutional Parole *

Officers and All Statewide Future *

Parole Officers, Official and Individual *

Capacity, *

*

Appellees, *

*

Nathan Roper, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 28, 2009

Filed: May 4, 2009

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-3-

Missouri inmates Ricky Rollins, Alex Mason, Cornelius Williams, and Henry

French (plaintiffs) challenge the district court’s1

 preservice dismissal of their 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action, while inmates Alvin Dudley, Samuel Smith, Lonnie Wolford,

and Nathan Roper challenge the court’s denial of their motions to intervene. 

After de novo review, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999)

(per curiam), we conclude that the federal constitutional challenges raised in

plaintiffs’ complaint fail. We affirm the preservice dismissal of the complaint, but we

modify it to be without prejudice as to the state-law claims, see Labickas v. Ark. State

Univ., 78 F.3d 333, 334-35 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (following dismissal of

federal claims, district court may dismiss state-law claims without prejudice). We also

conclude that the district court did not clearly abuse its discretion in denying the

intervention motions filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b). See South

Dakota ex rel. Barnett v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 317 F.3d 783, 787 (8th Cir. 2003)

(standard of review).

Accordingly, the decision of the district court is affirmed as modified. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50957

Summary Calendar

 

LI YU, Administrator of Estate of Wei Y. Wu,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; CAROLINE A. HERRERA,

In her Individual Capacity and her Official Capacity, Materials

and Test Section, Construction Division, Texas Department of

Transportation; KATHERINE L. HOLTZ, In her Individual Capacity

and her Official Capacity, Materials and Test Section,

Construction Division, Texas Department of Transportation,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(A-01-CV-741-SS)

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Li Yu appeals, pro se, the dismissal of her action under the

Americans With Disabilities Act, Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights

Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. §1985 and Texas tort law. We

affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court in

its 7 January and 2 August 2002 orders.
2

Li Yu asserts, for the first time on appeal, default judgment

should have been entered against Defendants because they failed to

timely answer her complaint. No authority need be cited for the

proposition that our court will not consider contentions made for

the first time on appeal. In any event, the Texas Department of

Transportation (TxDOT) timely filed 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) motions and

Herrera and Holtz timely filed answers in response to the

complaint. 

The district court properly held it lacked subject matter

jurisdiction because TxDOT and Herrera and Holtz, in their official

capacities, were immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment.

E.g., Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett,

531 U.S. 356 (2001). While there may be subject matter

jurisdiction for the Title VII claim, the district court properly

dismissed that claim for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies. Griffin v. City of Dallas, 26 F.3d 610, 612-13 (5th Cir.

1994). 

Finally, the district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing, for failure to prosecute, the claims against Herrera

and Holtz, in their individual capacities. Salinas v. Sun Oil Co.,

819 F.2d 105, 106 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName: Jennifer M. DavisTitle:   Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:   March 29, 2016
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID ADOLFSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2381

[January 4, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 432005CF001642A. 

David Adolfson, Doral, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-45,466-03

EX P ARTE COREY DESHUN FA RROW, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1280572-B IN THE 180T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault and sentenc ed to f orty year s’ imprisonment. The Four teenth Court of Appe als aff irmed his conviction. Farrow v. State , No. 14-11-00449- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Dec
. 4, 2012) (not designated f

or publication). Applicant conte nds that he is actua lly innocent, trial counsel was ineffe ctive, and the State eng ag ed in misconduct. The trial court enter ed a timely order designating issues and then enter ed an order direc ting the district cler k to forwa

rd the habea s rec ord to this Court. It is not clea r, howeve r,2

whether the trial cour

t made finding s of fa ct and conclusions of law. We r emand this a pplication 1

so the trial court can either forwa rd its finding s and con cl u s i o n s o r complete its evidentiar y investigation and make f

indings a nd conclusions. This application will be held in abeyance . I f the trial court made finding s and conclusions that inadver tently wer e not forwa

rded wi t h t h e record, they shall be forwar ded to this Court within 30 day s of the date of this order
. I f the trial court has not yet made finding s and conclusions, the issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcript containing all aff idavits and interrog atories or the transcription of the court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental finding s of fac t and conclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order
. Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial court a nd shall be obtained f

rom this Court.
Filed: Apr il 17, 2019 Do not publish

In a motion filed in the trial cour t, Applicant stated that the tria l court made finding s 1 and conc lusions on November 7, 2017, a nd rec ommended that re lief be de nied.
# Official Journal L 194/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 194 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6318 June 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 194

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6318 June 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/797 of 17 June 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 as regards requirements for animal by-products and derived products originating from, and returning to, the Union following refusal of entry by a third country (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/798 of 17 June 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2020) 4134)

   (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Decision No 1/2020 of the Joint European Union/Switzerland Air Transport Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport of 15 June 2020 replacing the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport [2020/799] | 17 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/797 of 17 June 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 as regards requirements for animal by-products and derived products originating from, and returning to, the Union following refusal of entry by a third country (
  1
  )

1

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/798 of 17 June 2020 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/47 on protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2020) 4134)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 4134)

1

6

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Decision No 1/2020 of the Joint European Union/Switzerland Air Transport Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport of 15 June 2020 replacing the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport [2020/799]

17

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.