alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.318-4 Constructive ownership as actual ownership; exceptions. ( a ) *In general.* Section 318(a)(5)(A) provides that, except as provided in section 318(a)(5) (B) and (C), stock constructively owned by a person by reason of the application of section 318(a) (1), (2), (3), or (4) shall be considered as actually owned by such person for purposes of applying section 318(a) (1), (2), (3), and (4). For example, if a trust owns 50 percent of the stock of corporation X, stock of corporation Y owned by corporation X which is attributed to the trust may be further attributed to the beneficiaries of the trust.
( b ) *Constructive family ownership.* Section 318(a)(5)(B) provides that stock constructively owned by an individual by reason of ownership by a member of his family shall not be considered as owned by him for purposes of making another family member the constructive owner of such stock under section 318(a)(1). For example, if F and his two sons, A and B, each own one-third of the stock of a corporation, under section 318(a)(1), A is treated as owning constructively the stock owned by his father but is not treated as owning the stock owned by B. Section 318(a)(5)(B) prevents the attribution of the stock of one brother through the father to the other brother, an attribution beyond the scope of section 318(a)(1) directly.
( c ) *Reattribution.* ( 1 ) Section 318(a)(5)(C) provides that stock constructively owned by a partnership, estate, trust, or corporation by reason of the application of section 318(a)(3) shall not be considered as owned by it for purposes of applying section 318(a)(2) in order to make another the constructive owner of such stock. For example, if two unrelated individuals are beneficiaries of the same trust, stock held by one which is attributed to the trust under section 318(a)(3) is not reattributed from the trust to the other beneficiary. However, stock constructively owned by reason of section 318(a)(2) may be reattributed under section 318(a)(3). Thus, for example, if all the stock of corporations X and Y is owned by A, stock of corporation Z held by X is attributed to Y through A.
( 2 ) Section 318(a)(5)(C) does not prevent reattribution under section 318(a)(2) of stock constructively owned by an entity under section 318(a)(3) if the stock is also constructively owned by the entity under section 318(a)(4). For example, if individuals A and B are beneficiaries of a trust and the trust has an option to buy stock from A, B is considered under section 318(a)(2)(B) as owning a proportionate part of such stock.
( 3 ) Section 318(a)(5)(C) is effective on and after August 31, 1964, except that for purposes of sections 302 and 304 it does not apply with respect to distributions in payment for stock acquisitions or redemptions if such acquisitions or redemptions occurred before August 31, 1964.
[T.D. 6969, 33 FR 11999, Aug. 23, 1968]
§ 1.1402(a)-12 Continental shelf and certain possessions of the United States. ( a ) *Certain possessions.* For purposes of the tax on self-employment income, the exclusion from gross income provided by section 931 (relating to bona fide residents of certain possessions of the United States) will not apply. Net earnings from self-employment are subject to the tax on self-employment income even if such amounts are excluded from gross income under section 931.
( b ) *Continental shelf.* For the definition of the term “United States” and for other geographical definitions relating to the continental shelf, see section 638 and § 1.638-1.
( c ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to taxable years ending after April 9, 2008.
[T.D. 9391, 73 FR 19376, Apr. 9, 2008]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-20-00310-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

324th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 324-633446-18

Before Wallach, Gabriel, and Bassel, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE PATRICIA KINZLMAIER, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 8, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         000854858                        
<NAME>                        Ajay Sports, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U,S, Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                            415
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     7,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,355
<PP&E>                                          2,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,567
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           2,962
<PREFERRED>                                     1,250
<COMMON>                                          233
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,824)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,784
<SALES>                                        17,185 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,185 
<CGS>                                          14,108
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   20
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                716
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     (121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
427 A.2d 1223

#### Commonwealth v. Bozeman, Appellant.

Submitted August 28, 1979.

Raymond H. Bogaty, for appellant;

Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, LARSEN and LAVELLE, JJ.*

*

 Justice Rolf Larsen of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and Judge John E. Lavelle of the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, are sitting by designation.

Order affirmed.
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08012013b [8/20/2013 1:48:24 PM] Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION & INFORMATION POLICY 

### About OIRA Information Policy Federal Collection of Information Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside Communication Reports to Congress For Agencies Statistical Programs & Standards 

# Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units Date: 8 / 1 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable) Bob Wayland EPA Christa Fellne EPA Barry Elman EPA
Nick Huston EPA Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA
Dana Lazarus OMB/OIRA Rick Shelby GTA
Bruce Rodan OSTP
Robert Hilton Alstorn
Andrew Dicke GE Power of Water
Barbara Bankoff Bankoff Associates Bruce Rising Siemens
Anne Finken CEQ

Meeting material provided to OMB ( pages, kb)

Document 1 (18 pages, 591 kb) 

### About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home The White House Blog Photos & Videos
Photo Galleries Video Briefing Room Your Weekly Address Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases Issues Civil Rights Defense Disabilities Economy The Administration
President Barack Obama Vice President Joe Biden First Lady Michelle Obama Dr. Jill Biden About the White House
Inside the White House Presidents First Ladies The Oval Office Our Government
The Executive Branch The Legislative Branch The Judicial Branch The Constitution Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site SearchMeeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08012013b [8/20/2013 1:48:24 PM] Performances Live Streams Podcasts White House Schedule Presidential Actions Legislation Nominations & Appointments Disclosures Education Energy & Environment Ethics Equal Pay Foreign Policy Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Refinancing Rural Service Seniors & Social Security Snapshots Taxes Technology Urban and Economic Mobility Veterans Violence Prevention Women The Cabinet White House Staff Executive Office of the President Other Advisory Boards The Vice President's Residence & Office Eisenhower Executive Office Building Camp David Air Force One White House Fellows White House Internships Tours & Events Mobile Apps Federal Agencies & Commissions Elections & Voting State & Local Government Resources

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11228-11229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable On Federal Bonds: Manufacturers 
Alliance Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 9 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2009 Revision, published July 1, 2009, at 74 FR 31536.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company:
    Manufacturers Alliance Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i> 36897). 
Business.
    Address: P.O. Box 3031, Blue Bell, PA 19422-0754.
    Phone: (610) 397-5000. Underwriting Limitation B/: $ 6,077,000.
    Surety Licenses C/: AL, AK, AZ, AR, CO, CT, DE, DC, ID, IN, KS, KY, 
LA, ME, MD, MI, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OH, PA, RI, SC, SD, 
TN, UT, VT, VA, WA. Incorporated In: Pennsylvania.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2009 Revision, to 
reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as tong as the companies remain qualified

[[Page 11229]]

(see 31 CFR part 223). A list of qualified companies is published 
annually as of July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to 
the underwriting limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to 
transact surety business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: February 25, 2010.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-4939 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Beeson Meeting.
    Date: April 28-29, 2010.
    Time: 4 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Courtyard By Marriott Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: William Cruce, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Aging, Scientific Review Branch, Gateway 
Building 2C-212, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-402-
7704, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ffcedeafcfae8dff1f6feb1f1f6f7b1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82e1f0f7e1e7f5c2ecebe3acecebeaace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 4, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-5141 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 884.1710 Closed loop hysteroscopic insufflator with cutter-coagulator. ( a ) *Identification.* A closed loop hysteroscopic insufflator with cutter-coagulator is a prescription device configured for hysteroscopic insufflation, resection, and coagulation. It is used to perform diagnostic and surgical procedures (*i.e.,* resection and coagulation). This device type contains a closed-loop recirculating fluid management system for the controlled delivery of filtered distension fluid. This device type also contains a bipolar radiofrequency device used in conjunction with a hysteroscope for resection and coagulation of intrauterine tissues.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control(s) for this device are: ( 1 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 2 ) Software validation, verification, and hazard analysis must be provided.
( 3 ) Electrical equipment safety, including appropriate thermal and mechanical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing must be performed.
( 4 ) Device components that are labeled sterile must be validated to a sterility assurance level of 10−6.
( 5 ) Shelf-life testing that demonstrates the device packaging maintains sterility and the functionality of the device is maintained following simulated shipping and handling must be provided to support the proposed shelf life.
( 6 ) Non-clinical testing data must demonstrate the performance characteristics of the device. Detailed protocols and the test reports must be provided for each test. ( i ) The following tests must be performed for the resection portion of the device: ( A ) Mechanical testing to assess critical joint strength.
( B ) Device electrode temperature testing.
( C ) Coagulation depth testing.
( D ) Simulated use testing.
( E ) Device durability testing.
( ii ) The following tests must be performed for the fluid management portion of the device: ( A ) Mechanical testing to assess tensile strength of connections.
( B ) Pressure testing that demonstrates the following parameters, including accuracy of the pressure displayed; appropriate detection and response to overpressure conditions; activation of a secondary overpressure relief valve at the maximum safe level; and all accessories within the fluid path meet the pressure requirements.
( C ) Fluid delivery volume testing that demonstrates that the maximum fluid volume delivered is below a predefined level.
( D ) Flow rate testing.
( E ) Simulated use testing.
( F ) Filtration testing.
( G ) Blood filtration capacity testing.
( H ) Tissue collection capacity testing.
( I ) Filtrate characterization and testing that demonstrates that the continuous reintroduction of filtrate into the uterus does not pose a safety risk.
( 7 ) Clinician labeling must include: ( i ) Specific instructions and the clinical training needed for the safe use of the device.
( ii ) Appropriate warnings, precautions, and information related to overpressurization.
( iii ) Appropriate EMC information.
( iv ) An expiration date/shelf life.
[82 FR 35073, July 28, 2017]
Order entered July 10, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00266-CR

BYRON WILSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-56146-Q

ORDER

The reporter’s record was filed April 22, 2019. Missing from the record are all of the 

exhibits, specifically the State’s Exhibits #1 (incident report), #2 (incident report), #3 (affidavit), 

and #4 (DVD) as well as Defense Exhibit #1 (arrest report). We ORDER court reporter Karren 

Jones to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing true and correct viewable or playable 

copies of these exhibits within FOURTEEN DAYS of the date of this order. 

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 23, 2020

p0916

Order 

Clerk

September 23, 2020

161240

BETTY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161240

COA: 348910

Saginaw CC: 18-036643-NO

CITY OF SAGINAW,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<page>
                                                    EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS


I, Kevin Perry, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

	b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the <page>
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:  August 16, 2004         /s/	Kevin Perry
	Kevin Perry
	Chief Financial Officer,
	Demeter Management Corporation,
	general partner of the registrant