alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit 99.1
Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | The undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (1) | The
accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:
August 9, 2002


/s/  Marti Morfitt

Marti Morfitt
President & Chief Executive Officer






/s/  David J. Byrd

David J. Byrd
Vice President of Finance, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.4535 Nonpowered neurosurgical instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* A nonpowered neurosurgical instrument is a hand instrument or an accessory to a hand instrument used during neurosurgical procedures to cut, hold, or manipulate tissue. It includes specialized chisels, osteotomes, curettes, dissectors, elevators, forceps, gouges, hooks, surgical knives, rasps, scissors, separators, spatulas, spoons, blades, blade holders, blade breakers, probes, etc.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 882.9.
[44 FR 51730, Sept. 4, 1979, as amended at 59 FR 63012, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38808, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3760 Wrist joint carpal scaphoid polymer prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A wrist joint carpal scaphoid polymer prosthesis is a one-piece device made of silicone elastomer intended to be implanted to replace the carpal scaphoid bone of the wrist.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
### NUMBER 13 - 19 - 00457 - CR 

### COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RUBEN NUNEZ JR., Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



### ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam This cause is before the Court on appellant's fifth motion for extension of time to file the brief. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on February 26, 2020, and this Court has previously granted appellant four extensions for the filing of app ellant’s brief in this cause.The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's fifth motion for extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in this cause, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justi ce, appellant's fifth motion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted with order. The Court, however, looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter. Appellant's fifth motion for extensi on of time to file the brief is hereby GRANTED IN PART, and the Honorable Hector Bustos, counsel for appellant, is hereby ORDERED to file the appellate brief with this Court on or before November 9, 2020. Further motions for extension of time absent exigen t circumstances will not be favorably entertained by the Court. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 30th day of October, 2020.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications/MLI Project Committee will be held Thursday, April 8, 
2010, at 1 p.m., Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is 
invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for 
consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent 
to participate must be made with Marisa Knispel. For more information, 
please contact Ms. Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write 
TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, 
or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 3, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-4891 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 1.167(a)-13T Certain elections for intangible property (temporary).

For rules applying the elections under section 13261(g) (2) and (3) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to intangible property described in section 167(f), see § 1.197-1T.

[59 FR 11922, Mar. 15, 1994]
#### §§ 1.245A-1-1.245A-4 [Reserved]
#### Yellow Motors Credit Corporation *v.*Thomas Nigro

Argued June 4

decided June 4, 1968

*Isadore M. Waxman,*for the appellant (defendant).

The motion by the defendant to rectify the appeal from the Superior Court in Windham County is denied.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1996

___________________________

Merle Richard Schmidt

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

State of Iowa

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________

 Submitted: September 11, 2015

Filed: October 5, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d), Merle Schmidt removed state criminal

proceedings against him to the district court, which remanded the case to the state

1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Northern District of Iowa.
court. Schmidt appeals. After careful review, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction

to review the remand order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

______________________________

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Nursing Home Research.
    Date: May 7, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone 
Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: Jeannette L. Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institutes on Aging, National Institutes of 
Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-
402-7705. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#09434641475a464743304947404827474041274e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92d8dddadcc1dddcd8abd2dcdbd3bcdcdbdabcd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 4, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-5181 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7984 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to improve access to disaster assistance for individuals located in rural areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7984 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Small Business 

3 Resilience Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO DISASTER ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVID5 UALS LOCATED IN RURAL AREAS. 

6 Not later than one year after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business 

8 Administration shall ensure that the Associate Adminis9 trator of the Office of Disaster Recovery and Resilience 

10 of the Administration takes such actions as necessary to 

11 ensure that individuals located in rural areas (as defined 

12 in paragraph (16) of section 7(b) of the Small Business 

13 Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(16))) for which a disaster declara14 tion has been made under such section 7(b) have full ac15 cess to assistance provided under such section, including 

16 by providing targeted outreach and marketing materials 

17 to such individuals. 

18 SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT. 

19 The second paragraph (16) (relating to statute of 

20 limitations) of section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 

21 U.S.C. 636(b)) is redesignated as paragraph (17). 

Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7984 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business 

and for other purposes. sistance for individuals located in rural areas, Administration to improve access to disaster as-
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q of STERIS Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WALTER M ROSEBROUGH,
JR.Name:

Walter M Rosebrough, Jr.Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer/s/    MICHAEL J. TOKICHName:

Michael J. TokichTitle:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated: August 7, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             510
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                       830
<INVENTORY>                                      8,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,688
<PP&E>                                          62,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,378
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,088    
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,928
<SALES>                                         12,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,401
<CGS>                                            8,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    78
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (595)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (873)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
III

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 101

Authorizing printing additional copies of Senate hearing entitled ‘‘Nomination

of Judge Clarence Thomas to be Associate Justice of the Supreme

Court of the United States’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 28 (legislative day, APRIL 19), 1993

Mr. BIDEN (for himself and Mr. HATCH) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

Authorizing printing additional copies of Senate hearing entitled ‘‘Nomination of Judge Clarence Thomas to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United

States’’.

1 Resolved, That in addition to the usual number, there

2 shall be printed 250 copies of volumes 1, 2, 3, and 4 of

3 Senate hearing entitled, ‘‘Nomination of Judge Clarence

4 Thomas to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of

5 the United States’’, which may be printed at a cost not

6 to exceed $1,200 per volume, for the use of the Committee

7 on the Judiciary.

Æ
### IN THE CO URT OF APPEALS OF TE NNE SS EE
AT KNOX VILLE

IN RE: E STATE OF MINA RHEA MARTI N

A p p e a l f r o m t h e P r o b a t e C o u r t f o r M o n r o e C o u n t y
N o

. 2 0 1 0

- 0 6 4 H o n

. J

. R e e d D i x o n , J u d g e

N o

. E 2 0 1 2

- 0 0 9 6 5

- C O A

- R 3

- C V

- F I L E D

- S E P T E M B E R 1 8
, 2 0 1 2

T e n n

. R

. A p p

. P

. 3 A p p e a l a s o f R i g h t ; A p p e a l D i s m i s s e d

H E R S C H E L P IC K E N S F R A N K S

, P

. J

. , C H A R LE S D

. S U S A N O

, J R

. , J

. , a n d J O H N W

. M C C LA R T Y
, J

.

G i n g e r W i l s o n B u c h a n a n , C l e v e l a n d

, T e n n e s s e e , f o r a p p e l l a n t

, T e r e s a R u c k e r , P e r s o n a l

R e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h e E s t a t e

.

L

. V i n c e n t W i l l i a m s , O f f i c e o f t h e A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l

, N a s h v i l l e , T e n n e s s e e , f o r a p p e l l e e , S t a t e o f T e n n e s s e e , B u r e a u o f T e n n C a r e

.

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 1

I n t h i s a c t i o n , t h e E s t a t e h a s a p p e a l e d t o t h i s C o u r t t h e d e n i a l o f a n e x c e p t i o n t o

a p p e l l e e ' s c l a i m

.

A s h o w c a u s e o r d e r w a s e n t e r e d i n t h i s C o u r t o n A u g u s t 2 9

, 2 0 1 2

, d i r e c t i n g c o u n s e l

Rule 10 of the Rule s of the Cour t o f A p p e a l s p r o vi des : "T his Cour t, wit h the con cur re nce of al l 1 j udges par ti ci pat ing in the cas e, m ay af fi rm, re verse or m odi fy the act ion s of the tr ia l cou rt by m emorand um opi nio n when a for m al opi nio n woul d have no pre ced ent ia l value. Wh en a cas e is dec ide d by m emorand um opi nio n i t s hal l b e de si gnated ' MEM ORANDUM OPI NI ON,' sha ll not be publ is hed , and shal l not be c it ed

or re li ed o n f

or any re aso n i n an y unrel at ed c ase "f

o r t h e a p p e l l a n t t o s h o w c a u s e w h y t h i s a p p e a l s h o u l d n o t b e d i s m i s s e d f o r l a c k o f j u r i s d i c t i o n , b a s e d u p o n t h e u n t i m e l y f i l i n g o f t h e N o t i c e o f A p p e a l

. C o u n s e l f o r t h e

a p p e l l a n t h a s f

a i l e d t o r e s p o n d t o t h e s h o w c a u s e o r d e r w i t h i n t h e t i m e s p e c i f i e d i n t h a t o r d e r

.

A n u n t i m e l y n o t i c e o f a p p e a l d e p r i v e s t h i s C o u r t o f j u r i s d i c t i o n

. S e e T e n n

. R

. A p p

. P

. 4 ( a )

. A l s o s e e C o b b v

. B e i e r
, 9 4 4 S

. W

. 2 d 3 4 3

, 3 4 4 n

. 2 ( T e n n

. 1 9 9 7 )

.

I t i s t h e r e f

o r e O r d e r e d a n d A d

j u d g e d t h a t t h i s a p p e a l b e a n d h e r e b y i s d i s m i s s e d

. T h e

c o s t s o f t h e a p p e a l a r e a s s e s s e d t o t h e E s t a t e o f M i n a R h e a M a r t i n

.

P E R C U R I A M

-2-
April 19, 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAMION J. POTTS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01172

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED and that this decision be certified below for

observan ce.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6704

DAVID DESHON SIMMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GARY MILLER, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-03-563-1)

Submitted: October 7, 2004 Decided: October 13, 2004

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Deshon Simms, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David Deshon Simms appeals from the denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition by the district court. An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that Simms has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid in the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 900.7 Hearings. ( a ) Opportunities to challenge final adverse actions taken by FDA regarding approval or reapproval of accreditation bodies, withdrawal of approval of accreditation bodies, or rejection of a proposed fee for accreditation shall be communicated through notices of opportunity for informal hearings in accordance with part 16 of this chapter.
( b ) A facility that has been denied accreditation is entitled to an appeals process from the accreditation body. The appeals process shall be specified in writing by the accreditation body and shall have been approved by FDA in accordance with § 900.3(d) or § 900.4(a)(8).
( c ) A facility that cannot achieve satisfactory resolution of an adverse accreditation decision through the accreditation body's appeals process may appeal to FDA for reconsideration in accordance with § 900.15.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 37718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18022]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, July 28, 2009, 9 a.m. to July 
28, 2009, 8 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal Register on July 
17, 2009, 74 FR 34762-34764.
    The meeting will be held August 3, 2009 to August 4, 2009. The 
meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: July 23, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-18022 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P