CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

*** TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNED TO ARB ~

All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain

information and documentation for the rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules will

not be evaluated for approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To assist you in

determining that all necessary materials are mcluded in rules packages sent the ARB for submittal to the EPA,

please fill out the following form and mclude at with the rule package you send ARB. See the ARB’s Guidelines

on the Implementation of the EPA’s Draft SIP Completeness Policy, October 1989, for a more detailed explanation

than is provided here.

District: South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule No. 2202

Date Amended: October 9, 1998

Rule Title: On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Not

Attached Attached N/A

(X) () ?T COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy of the

entire rule as adopted or amended by your District Board.

(X) () () UNDERLINE AND STRiKEOUT COPY OF TIlE RULE: If an

amended rule, provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in

underline and strikeout format all language which has been added,

deleted, or changed since the rule was last adopted or amended.

(X) () () COMPLETE COPY OF THE REFERENCED RULE(S): For any rule

which includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of

that other rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been

submitted to EPA as part of a previous SIP submittal.

(X) () () PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy of the local newspaper

clipping certification(s), stating the date of publication, which must be at

least 30 days before the hearing. As an alternative, include a copy of the

actual published notice of the public hearing as it appeared in the local

newspaper(s). In this case, however, enough of the newspaper page must

be mcluded to show the date ofpublication. the notice must specifically

identify by title and number each rule adopted or amended.

(X) () () RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER: Provide the Board Clerk certified

resolution or minute order. This document must include certification

that the hearing was held in accordance with the information in the

public notice. It must also list the rules that were adopted or amended,

the date of the public hearing, and a statement of compliance with

California Health and Safety Code Sections 40725-40728

(Administrative Procedures Act).

(X) () () PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies of written

public comments made during the notice period and at the public

hearing. Also submit any written responses prepared by the District staff

or presented to the District Board at the public hearing. A summary of

the public comments and responses is adequate. If there were no

comments made during the notice period or at the hearing, please

indicate N/A to the left.
TECHNICAL MATERIALS

Not

Attached Attached N/A

(X) () ~T RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the

Rule Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form.

C) () (X) NON-EPA TEST METHOD: Include all test methods referenced in the rule, but not previously submitted to EPA. Provide an explanation of the

purpose and principle for the test method and include the following

supportmg technical data: describe the test details (number of tests to be

carned out, their precision accuracy, and repeatability); on a technical

basis, compare the method with the appropriate EPAJASTM method;

explain the technical differences of the two methods and how they affect

monitormg of the parameters of interest; explain how the test method

affects the implementation and enforcement of the applicable rule;

explain the advantages and any potential shortcomings of the test

method.

() (X) MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate; in general modeling

support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their

impacts on ozone levels. Modeling is rçquired where a rule is a

relaxation that affects large sources (~ 100 TPY) in an attainment area

for S02, directly emitted PM1O, CO, or NOx (for N02 purposes). In

cases where EPA is concerned with the impact on air quality of rule

revisions which relax limits or cause a shift in emission patterns in a

nonãttainment area, a reference back to the approved SIP will be

sufficient provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling

guidelines. If current EPA modeling guidelines were not used, then new

modeling may be required.

() (X) ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR

I ‘ I ‘ I ~ • A • I I : s appropriate, escri e

special circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACY is used, extended

compliance date are included, etc. A completed SIP Approvability

Checklist-Enforceability will fulfill this requirement.

(X) () () ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Provide any other supporting

information concerning development of the rule or rule changes, such as

staff reports.

(ARBFORM - 6/93)