alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,113; TA-W-71,113A]

      ( print page 37735)    
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on June 9, 2009, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Climate Control, Inc., Franklin, Indiana (TA-W-71,113), and Greenwood, Indiana (TA-W-71,113A).

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of June 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-18055 Filed 7-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
April 25, 1980

427 A.2d 1222

#### Commonwealth v. Barsky, Appellant.

Submitted June 29, 1979.

Irwin Lee Gross, for appellant;

Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, P.J., and WIEAND and LOUIK, JJ.*

*

 Judge Donald E. Wieand is sitting by special designation. Judge Maurice Louik of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
39481.

#### AMERICAN FINANCE & LOAN CORPORATION *et al.*v. COOTS.

Decided May 1, 1962.

*851*Rogers, Magruder, Hoyt, Wright <& Walther, Clinton J. Morgan,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Fullbright ■& Duffey, Harl C. Duffey, Jr.,*contra.

Jordan, Judge.

That the instant petition set forth a cause of action is clearly shown by the decisions of this court in the cases of *American Security Co. v. Cook,*49 Ga. App. 723 (176 SE 798); *Atlanta Hub Co. v. Jones,*47 Ga. App. 778 (171 SE 470); and *Personal Finance Co. of Atlanta v. Loggins,*50 Ga. App. 562 (179 SE 162). In each of these cases it was held that alleged conduct substantially similar to that of the defendants herein constituted a wilful, voluntary, and intentional tort resulting in mental suffering and wounded feelings to the plain*852tiff, for which damages could be recovered. The trial court therefore did not err in overruling the defendants’ general demurrers.

We have carefully examined the various special demurrers filed by each of the defendants to the petition, and find them to be without merit with the exception of the special demurrers filed to paragraphs 18 and 24 of the amended petition. These demurrers, which called for certain specific information in regard to the allegations of the enumerated paragraphs as to the medical treatment and expenses of the plaintiff and his wife, were meritorious, and the trial court erred in overruling them. *Louisville &c. R. Co. v.*Barnwell, 131 Ga. 791 (4) (63 SE 501).

*Judgment affirmed in part; reversed in part.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7977 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the minimum number 

of participating students required to establish or maintain a unit of 

the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2024 

Mr. WALTZ (for himself, Ms. HOULAHAN, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. 

MOYLAN, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. RYAN, Mr. DAVIS of North 

Carolina, Mr. MCCORMICK, Mr. PALMER, Mrs. KIGGANS of Virginia, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Mr. BANKS, Mr. BACON, Mr. GIMENEZ, Mr. WITTMAN, and 

Mr. KHANNA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the minimum number of participating students required to establish or maintain a unit of the Junior Reserve Officers’ 

Training Corps. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving JROTC 

5 Programs Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7977 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION TO MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARTICI2 PATING STUDENTS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH 

3 OR MAINTAIN A UNIT OF JROTC. 

4 Section 2031(b)(1)(A) of title 10, United States 

5 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘100’’ and inserting ‘‘50’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Summary of vehicle occupantprotection and motorcycle laws: current as of...**
 
2012 | 2013 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:TD 8.68:
Item Number:0982-D-72 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001018071
 
September 10, 2019
U.S. Deportment of Transpollotion Federal Aviation Administration
January 7, 201 1
Mr. David McDonald VP Operations Aeronautical Engineers, Inc. 7765 NW 54th St Miami, FL, 33166
Dear Mr. McDonald: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Und Avenue, S_W. Renton. Washington 98057-3356

Inreviewing your November 10,2010, petition faTexemption fTOm certain requirements of Title 14,Code orFederal Regulations (refer to Federal Docket number FAA-2010-1181), forthe McDonnell Douglas Model MD-SOandMD-90 series passenger airplanes converted to freighter airplanes, theFAA requests clarification ofa few matters. Your petition requests carriage ofsix non-crcwmcmbefS (a.k.a. supernumeraries) inan area just aftof, and outside, the flight deck on these freighter airplanes. You further state that «Some operators ofAEI freighters need tobe able to carry supernumeraries to assist ,",vith special cargo such a[sJ
... livecargo requiring special attention
... n Ifyour petition intends to request supernumerary access tothe cargo compartment during flight, please state this explicitly inyour pelition. Trnot explicitly requested, the FAA does not grant supernumerary access tocargo compartments during flight. Your petition requests excmption from §§ 25.785(d), 25.785(j), and 25.812(c). However, these sections arc cited inconsistently within your petition. The FAA is unsurc as to whether these sections arc intended sections from which you seek exemption. Please re-submit your petition clarifying these matters, including consistent and accurate section citations_You may e-mail your petition directly to Alan Sinclair (see address below) and we will upload your petition to the Federal Docket. We will advise you ofom final decision on your petition as soon as possible. Ifyou have any questions orconcerns regarding your petition orthepetition process, please contact Alan Sinclair at (425) 227- 2195, e-mail alan.sil1clair@faa_gov. Sincerely,

•.---_L- /

_ 

### 1
. ~J. _-

~ .----!. 

### ( ·'~·i-:2-};.

.

### .,.z,.,~ -

## ,--------~;a"J-tl~·-''- =~:'-'-')

-- - ~ ~ _--f-_. Franklin Tiangsing / (/ Manager, Airframe and Cabin Safety Branch, ANM- 115 Standards Staff, Transport Airplane Directorate
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11136-11137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5098]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Federal Advisory Committee; U.S. Nuclear Command and Control 
System Comprehensive Review Committee; Charter Termination

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Termination of Federal advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
1972, (5 U.S.C. Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine 
Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and title 41 of the CFR, the 
Department of Defense gives notice that it is terminating the charter 
for the U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System Comprehensive Review 
Committee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Freeman, Deputy Committee 
Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-601-6128.

[[Page 11137]]

    Dated: March 4, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010-5098 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated August 28, 2009 and published in the Federal 
Register on September 8, 2009, (74 FR 46232), Noramco Inc., Division of 
Ortho McNeil, Inc., 500 Swedes Landing Road, Wilmington, Delaware 
19801-4417, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 
Noroxymorphone (9668), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
schedule II.
    The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled 
substance as a reference standard for distribution to its customers 
which are analytical laboratories.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Noramco Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Noramco Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above 
named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: January 6, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-508 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Hamilton, Paul CTR (FAA)

Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 7:42 AM

To: pjones@martinuav.com

Cc: Troutman, Jake (FAA); Cappelle, Michele (FAA)

Subject: Request for Information

Mr. Jones:

Since our regulatory group has temporarily suspended posting requests for information to the public docket, I’ve been

authorized to send the equivalent request via e

‐ mail instead. The information listed below as well as your response will

be posted to the docket at a later date. If you have any questions, please call or e

‐ mail at your convenience.

• A detailed description of the aircraft design and configuration for the V

‐ Bat, focusing on the UAS features

and flight characteristics to include, but not limited to:

o Aircraft weights and center of gravity range

o Detailed 3 view drawings with scale of the aircraft and any launch and recovery equipment if

applicable

o Operational history with supporting statistics.

o Results of analysis and flight testing of UAS

o Lessons learned from repairs and alterations performed during operations to include design

changes and fixes due to operational failure(s)

o Details of any injuries or property damage resulting from flight/ground operations

o Safety analysis of any failure modes such as lost link, fly

‐ away, loss of control, etc.

• Copies of manuals, photographs, videos/telemetry may be provided as support

• Any other information to support an analysis of operational safety with unmanned aircraft in excess of 55

pounds.

Thanking you in advance,

Paul

Paul Hamilton / SAIC

Senior Policy Analyst – AVS Safety Technical Services Support contract

Flight Technologies and Procedures Division - Management Operations Branch (DC)

Email: paul.ctr.hamilton@faa.gov

Direct: 202-267-4773
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 6, 2021

No. 04-20-00549-CV

IN RE J.I.P., A.R.P., S.R.P., I.S.P., AND F.A.P., CHILDREN

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA02732

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file a brief is granted. We order appellant's 

brief due January 18, 2021. This is an accelerated appeal of an order in a suit for termination of 

the parent-child relationship that must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date 

the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Because of the 

time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time 

will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. RP10-134-000; RP09-423-000; RP09-423-002]

Take notice that Commission Staff will convene a technical conference in the above-referenced proceedings on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 at 10 a.m. (EST), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

The purpose of the technical conference is to consider the issues raised by Columbia Gulf Transmission Company's (Columbia Gulf) Incentive Fixed Fuel filing in Docket No. RP10-134-000 and what changes, if any, might be necessary or appropriate. Because Columbia Gulf's Incentive Fixed Fuel filing presents interrelated issues with the Transportation Retainage Adjustment filing in Docket Nos. RP09-423-000 and RP09-423-002, the technical conference will also consider the issues raised in those dockets that relate to the Incentive Fixed Fuel proposal.

Commission Staff and interested persons will have the opportunity to discuss all of the issues raised by Columbia Gulf's filings. Specifically, Columbia Gulf should be prepared to address all the concerns raised in the protests, and if necessary, to provide additional technical, engineering and operational support for its proposals. Any party proposing alternatives to Columbia Gulf's proposals should also be prepared to similarly support its position.

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free (866) 208-3372 (voice) or (202) 502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further information please contact Anna Fernandez at (202) 502-6682 or e-mail                     *Anna Fernandez@ferc.gov.*

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-516 Filed 1-13-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

mw SArst quertlan sbmrsd be anwered in tha ckfmmfbi&vu, for the iv1mving ma8mIvt 

m&rrmlEnf;lAmevvvrv-eoll~t~ wo2msdvr8ppvlntod by the bv#aw'4Ollocto~, xwvertbelvro, vrmah dvpxt&av are 

oppi5ors tskummvi?s of the 8omt7 rPada *v Buts, vbom vvm= 

~Unlqatd @utePfeea earnedby th4As+~e~~~~~~s 

. AMlc1e aElPi,avvr WT. statf! vf Parr 

sueb a deputy is not dWT#ent fromrbat it vvuld bv it him 

appoix&mentV~ madebiWvtl~b7 tie Ckm&mlonerv~ Court 6i 

t&o county r&ber than by th0 Avvvvsvr-COllvvtvr. 

It ie Dlrrga tha duty ot amb vftiaer emplcylag a 

de@lty to pay anlab d8puty but of tire ottwont roes of dtLcs 

$be.ollount t8 vhiab hs ie entAtS& Mba the pco*idenv vi 

the appl&Mb1r 6fatutes* 3vr. cir* stat., Art. 258811. If is 

furthor pervaded in the Istiicrle juet o&ted *If the aurrtmt 

fvea of iswh kW%ve oallvotvd In amy yem be mwe than the 

anmantntmded ta psy the smouate above opeclfled e~wgl vball 

be domed esoess fvev, ani? shall be dlvpovvd of 1x1 the BBDII@ 

herainnfter proridod .* 

The 0~0~s iatq.wm of the tegialoture tca6 to protidv a FSMNM far prying anob deputies, atad f"?mtbvr to prvv%de 

that vu& de&aat7 or depltfw rsfe mtitled to leak Pox' p*g"aftaf 

to the fees oS off%ae collsoteil by their superior during the 

flsoal year. mlis, we think, is 0 clear ia@ioat?ion of the 

rPtatut%. 
Honorable Ben Je iWin - FWge 4 

Whether the deput7*s ealaq 1% peiQ~amntbl7 

RJJ it aecruee~ or .iO'doSormtd until the end of the f%- 

cm1 year, awerthelses, if there am fees of oPf'&ce 

Croashich payngmtaan be Wse, MO ols;Lmic a just 

om against SUJ% Pew, aad should be roaognS,xod and 

pdd therafrcm. 

mctudaent0 0P on ofrice may corn and ge, but 

the offlae rUnctions so leng as there is an iBe\oribent. 

There 1s no reason utiy the deputiee* salaries 

ebtmld not bo paAd POP U&r samloes duly perporrmd out 

of Seas of offlc~o vbleh you my JWO QB bopl, merely beaau0e ~uub foes hrre be4n oolle0t+3d r?Jr *3 suicoessor in 

oifiatl to one WbO e!mployQd lauQb daprtp. 

Xfmr aaeond que&dan 1iJ~~Ioe Snoul~ be onerered 

in the afZimatire, teisauss, olsarly, &&~defaultkug ofilcar to the extent *at he had fuudu in his paseesaion orailable &O&&U have pa&d au& funds to the deputy or dequties. 

In ocher aerde, a fuithf'ul c2imbarge of h&e dutise requlrod 

:- i.. 
-
#### § 660.44 Specificity.

Each filling of the product shall be specific for Hepatitis B Surface Antigen as determined by specificity tests found acceptable to the Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

[44 FR 36382, June 22, 1979, as amended at 49 FR 23834, June 8, 1984; 55 FR 11013, Mar. 26, 1990]
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Frederick Sinica

Submitted. June 10

decided June 25, 1968

*Joseph D. Harbaugh,*chief public defender, in support of the petition.

*Arnold Markle,*chief prosecuting attorney, in opposition.

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5600 Neurovascular mechanical thrombectomy device for acute ischemic stroke treatment. ( a ) *Identification.* A neurovascular mechanical thrombectomy device for acute ischemic stroke treatment is a prescription device used in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke to improve clinical outcomes. The device is delivered into the neurovasculature with an endovascular approach, mechanically removes thrombus from the body, and restores blood flow in the neurovasculature.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The patient contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 2 ) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use, including: ( i ) Mechanical testing to demonstrate the device can withstand anticipated tensile, torsional, and compressive forces.
( ii ) Mechanical testing to evaluate the radial forces exerted by the device.
( iii ) Non-clinical testing to verify the dimensions of the device.
( iv ) Non-clinical testing must demonstrate the device can be delivered to the target location in the neurovasculature and retrieve simulated thrombus under simulated use conditions.
( v ) Non-clinical testing must demonstrate the device is radiopaque and can be visualized.
( vi ) Non-clinical testing must evaluate the coating integrity and particulates under simulated use conditions.
( vii ) Animal testing must evaluate the safety of the device, including damage to the vessels or tissue under anticipated use conditions.
( 3 ) Performance data must support the sterility and pyrogenicity of the patient contacting components of the device.
( 4 ) Performance data must support the shelf-life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the specified shelf-life.
( 5 ) Clinical performance testing of the device must demonstrate the device performs as intended for use in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke and must capture any adverse events associated with the device and procedure.
( 6 ) The labeling must include: ( i ) Information on the specific patient population for which the device is intended for use in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, including but not limited to, specifying time from symptom onset, vessels or location of the neurovasculature that can be accessed for treatment, and limitations on core infarct size.
( ii ) Detailed instructions on proper device preparation and use for thrombus retrieval from the neurovasculature.
( iii ) A summary of the clinical testing results, including a detailed summary of the device- and procedure-related complications and adverse events.
( iv ) A shelf life.
[81 FR 94253, Dec. 23, 2016]