alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8144 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8144

 To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to include rural 
emergency hospitals in the definition of a covered entity for purposes 
                   of the 340B drug discount program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2024

  Mr. Bergman (for himself and Mrs. Dingell) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to include rural 
emergency hospitals in the definition of a covered entity for purposes 
                   of the 340B drug discount program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural 340B Access Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. INCLUDING RURAL EMERGENCY HOSPITALS AS COVERED ENTITIES FOR 
              PURPOSES OF THE 340B DRUG DISCOUNT PROGRAM.

    Section 340B(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
256b(a)(4)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(P) An entity that is a rural emergency hospital 
                (as defined in section 1861(kkk)(2) of the Social 
                Security Act) that is owned or operated by a unit of 
                State or local government, is a public or private non-
                profit corporation which is formally granted 
                governmental powers by a unit of State or local 
                government, or is a private non-profit rural emergency 
                hospital which has a contract with a State or local 
                government to provide health care services to low 
                income individuals who are not entitled to benefits 
                under title XVIII of the Social Security Act or 
                eligible for assistance under the State plan under this 
                title.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 898.11 Applicability.

Electrode lead wires and patient cables intended for use with a medical device shall be subject to the performance standard set forth in § 898.12.
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.1100 Arthroscope. ( a ) *Identification.* An arthroscope is an electrically powered endoscope intended to make visible the interior of a joint. The arthroscope and accessories also is intended to perform surgery within a joint.
( b ) *Classification.* ( 1 ) Class II (performance standards).
( 2 ) Class I for the following manual arthroscopic instruments: cannulas, currettes, drill guides, forceps, gouges, graspers, knives, obturators, osteotomes, probes, punches, rasps, retractors, rongeurs, suture passers, suture knotpushers, suture punches, switching rods, and trocars. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(2) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 888.9.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 1124, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38815, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.5770 Powered radiation therapy patient support assembly. ( a ) *Identification.* A powered radiation therapy patient support assembly is an electrically powered adjustable couch intended to support a patient during radiation therapy.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
# C_2015155EN.01004301.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/43

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — Coedo Suárez v Council

(Case F-38/14) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary action - Revocation and reduction of the invalidity allowance - Proportionality of the penalty - Manifest error of assessment - Concept of conduct of the official throughout his career - Adhering to working hours))

(2015/C 155/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ángel Coedo Suárez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the Secretary General of the Council to impose the penalty of revoking and reducing the invalidity allowance by 15 % until the age of retirement.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Coedo Suárez to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Coedo Suárez to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014, p. 45.

1

---
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A
                                 Amendment No. 1

MARK ONE:
              (X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1999

                                       OR

              ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                          OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934

                        For the transition period from to

                           Commission File No. 0-18204

                                AJAY SPORTS, INC.
             ----------------------------------------------------
            (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

         Delaware                                                 39-1644025
-------------------------------                             --------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of                             (I.R.S.  Employer
 Incorporation or Organization)                              Identification No.)


1501 E. Wisconsin Street,
Delavan, Wisconsin   53115                                 (414) 728-5521
---------------------------------------                 ------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices                 (Registrant's  Telephone
Number, including Zip Code)                              including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  Registrant  was
required  to file  such  report),  and  (2)  has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

            Yes  /x/                              No  / /

Number of shares of common stock outstanding at March 31, 1999 is 3,956,815.

                  Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format

                        Yes               No     x
                            ------            ------


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES


Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



AJAY SPORTS, INC.




By:    /s/Robert R. Hebard
   -------------------------
Its: Duly Authorized Officer






By:    /s/Barb Wargolet
   ----------------------
Its: Corporate Controller



Date:      May 14, 1999
     --------------------





                                       11
[Cite as Beyer v. Rieter Automotive N. Am., Inc., 134 Ohio St.3d 379, 2012-Ohio-5627.] 

BEYER ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. RIETER AUTOMOTIVE 

NORTH AMERICAN, INC., APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, ET AL. 

[Cite as Beyer v. Rieter Automotive N. Am., Inc., 134 Ohio St.3d 379, 

2012-Ohio-5627.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of Hewitt v. L.E. Myers Co.

(No. 2012-1283—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012. 

APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, 

No. L-11-1110, 2012-Ohio-2807. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal and cross-appeal are accepted. The 

judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Hewitt v. L.E. 

Myers Co., 134 Ohio St.3d 199, 2012-Ohio-5317, 981 N.E.2d 795, and judgment is 

entered in favor of Rieter Automotive North American, Inc. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER,

CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

PFEIFER, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of 

appeals. 

__________________ 

Spitler & Williams-Young Co., L.P.A., Marc G. Williams-Young, and 

Elaine B. Szuch, for appellees and cross-appellants, Thomas H. Beyer and Sherry 

Beyer. 

Weston Hurd, L.L.P., Shawn W. Maestle, and Jeffrey L. Tasse, for 

appellant and cross-appellee. 

______________________
§ 1.215-1 Periodic alimony, etc., payments. ( a ) A deduction is allowable under section 215 with respect to periodic payments in the nature of, or in lieu of, alimony or an allowance for support actually paid by the taxpayer during his taxable year and required to be included in the income of the payee wife or former wife, as the case may be, under section 71. As to the amounts required to be included in the income of such wife or former wife, see section 71 and the regulations thereunder. For definition of *husband* and *wife* see section 7701(a) (17).
( b ) The deduction under section 215 is allowed only to the obligor spouse. It is not allowed to an estate, trust, corporation, or any other person who may pay the alimony obligation of such obligor spouse. The obligor spouse, however, is not allowed a deduction for any periodic payment includible under section 71 in the income of the wife or former wife, which payment is attributable to property transferred in discharge of his obligation and which, under section 71(d) or section 682, is not includible in his gross income.
( c ) The following examples, in which both H and W file their income tax returns on the basis of a calendar year, illustrate cases in which a deduction is or is not allowed under section 215: Example 1. Pursuant to the terms of a decree of divorce, H, in 1956, transferred securities valued at $100,000 in trust for the benefit of W, which fully discharged all his obligations to W. The periodic payments made by the trust to W are required to be included in W's income under section 71. Such payments are stated in section 71(d) not to be includible in H's income and, therefore, under section 215 are not deductible from his income.
Example 2. A decree of divorce obtained by W from H incorporated a previous agreement of H to establish a trust, the trustees of which were instructed to pay W $5,000 a year for the remainder of her life. The court retained jurisdiction to order H to provide further payments if necessary for the support of W. In 1956 the trustee paid to W $4,000 from the income of the trust and $1,000 from the corpus of the trust. Under the provisions of sections 71 and 682(b), W would include $5,000 in her income for 1956. H would not include any part of the $5,000 in his income nor take a deduction therefor. If H had paid the $1,000 to W pursuant to court order rather than allowing the trustees to pay it out of corpus, he would have been entitled to a deduction of $1,000 under the provisions of section 215.
( d ) For other examples, see sections 71 and 682 and the regulations thereunder.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000854860
<NAME>                       Williams Controls, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         961
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,867  
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (185) 
<INVENTORY>                                 14,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,946
<PP&E>                                      24,223
<DEPRECIATION>                              (6,580) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,852
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       180   
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,410  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,642
<SALES>                                     14,944    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,944     
<CGS>                                       10,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,117   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             376   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,093   
<INCOME-TAX>                                   421
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            694
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
        



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 5, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00153

- CV

Anurekha Chadha, M.D. and Austin Regional Clinic, P.A., Appellant s

v.

Sharon Rothert and Fred Rothert, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, RO SE AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order en tered by the tr i a l court on February 11, 2013

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial

court’s interlocutory order. The appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this

Court and the court below.
#### Johnny James JONES *v.*STATE of Arkansas

5505

453 S. W. 2d 403

Opinion delivered May 11, 1970

[Rehearing denied June 1, 1970.]

*Walton Mauarras,*for appellant.

*Joe Purcell,*Attorney General; *Michael Barrier,*Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant, Johnny James Jones, was found guilty of rape and sentenced to thirty years imprisonment. His plea for reversal is based on a single point, namely, alleged improper remarks in the closing argument of the prosecuting attorney.

The defendant elected not to testify. The prosecutor made these statements concerning the whereabouts of the accused on the morning of the alleged rape:

> I leave you with a thought. Johnny James Jones knows where he was on that morning. . . . Johnny *695James Jones knows where he was on the 9th of July at 8:30 in the morning. There are two people who know where he was — Mrs. Linda Hicks [prosecutrix] and Johnny James Jones.

Defense counsel immediately interposed this objection:

> Your honor, at this time I would have to object to the reference, ‘Johnny James Jones knows where he was on the 9th of July.’ We do not have to prove his innocence. The State proves guilt and Mr. Jones certainly does not have an obligation to tell the jury where he was.

> THE COURT: That’s true. Your objection is sustained in that respect.

The closing argument was shortly concluded without further incident. Then followed the instructions to the jury as to forms of verdicts, whereupon the jury retired to deliberate. Shortly thereafter defense counsel moved for a mistrial “with respect to Mr. Thompson’s closing argument and his reference to the failure of the accused to take the stand and state his presence on the morning of July 9, 1969.” The motion was denied. Appellant contends here that the trial court committed reversible error in overruling his motion.

The fallacy in the point for reversal lies in the fact that the second objection came too late. Our holdings are in accord with the general rule stated in Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure (1957), § 2079:

> The remedy for any improprieties on the part of the prosecuting attorney in summing up is to interpose immediate objection. . . . Generally the argument must be interrupted at the moment it is made; to delay until the end of the argument is generally fatal ....

A case in point is *Shipp*v. *State,*241 Ark. 120, 406 *696S. W. 2d 361 (1966). After the jury had retired, defense counsel moved for a mistrial because of an alleged improper statement made in the closing argument of the prosecuting attorney. We held that the objection “came too late and the point cannot now be urged.” Also, see *Childs*v. *State,*243 Ark. 62, 418 S. W. 2d 793 (1967). The reason for the rule is obvious. The most appropriate time for the trial judge to evaluate an error in the proceedings is at the time an error is made; in most instances the judge can cure any such error by appropriate admonition. In fact in the instant case we think the trial court could have removed any objectionable inferences contained in the prosecutor’s statement had the proper request for admonition been timely made.

Affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Docket Nos.Crystal Lake Wind III, LLC
EG10-6-000GardenGarden Wind, LLC
EG10-7-000Star Point Wind Project LLC
EG10-8-000Nacogdoches Power, LLC
EG10-9-000FSE Blythe 1, LLC
EG10-10-000Ridgewind Power Partners, LLC
EG10-11-000Stetson Wind II, LLC
EG10-13-000Buffalo Ridge II LLC
EG10-14-000Elm Creek Wind II LLC
EG10-15-000Cottonwood Energy Company LP
EG10-16-000
 Take notice that during the months of January and February, 2010, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations 18 CFR 366.7(a). Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2010-5205 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         503,366
<SECURITIES>                                   224,224
<RECEIVABLES>                                  832,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,000
<INVENTORY>                                    671,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,232,917
<PP&E>                                       4,978,482
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,202,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,043,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          832,279
<BONDS>                                      1,399,520
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,387,354        
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,387,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,043,084
<SALES>                                      4,392,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,643,654
<CGS>                                        2,406,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,121,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,025,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                   397,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            628,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   628,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.4350 Manual ophthalmic surgical instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* A manual ophthalmic surgical instrument is a nonpowered, handheld device intended to aid or perform ophthalmic surgical procedures. This generic type of device includes the manual corneal burr, ophthalmic caliper, ophthalmic cannula, eyelid clamp, ophthalmic muscle clamp, iris retractor clip, orbital compressor, ophthalmic curette, cystotome, orbital depressor, lachrymal dilator, erisophake, expressor, ophthalmic forcep, ophthalmic hook, sphere introducer, ophthalmic knife, ophthalmic suturing needle, lachrymal probe, trabeculotomy probe, cornea-sclera punch, ophthalmic retractor, ophthalmic ring (Flieringa), lachrymal sac rongeur, ophthalmic scissors, enucleating snare, ophthalmic spatula, ophthalmic specula, ophthalmic spoon, ophthalmic spud, trabeculotome or ophthalmic manual trephine.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
[52 FR 33355, Sept. 2, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 35606, Sept. 14, 1988; 59 FR 63013, Dec. 7, 1994; 60 FR 15872, Mar. 28, 1995; 66 FR 38813, July 25, 2001]