**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-K**

(Mark One)

**x****  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022or**

**o**** ****TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the transition period from _____ to _____Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-193376-23**

**Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity:0001651790**

**COMM 2015-CCRE26 Mortgage Trust**

**(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001013454**

**Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation**

**(exact name of the depositor as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541294**

**German American Capital Corporation**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001558761**

**Cantor Commercial Real EstateLending, L.P.**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001555524**

**LoanCore Capital Markets LLC**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

**(formerly known as Jefferies LoanCore LLC)**

** **

| **New York****(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization of**

**the issuing entity)** | **38-3979769**

**38-3979770**

**38-7143624**

**(I.R.S. Employer**

**Identification Numbers)** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**c/o Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as agent for**

**Wells Fargo Bank, National Association**

**as Certificate Administrator**

**9062 Old Annapolis Road**

**Columbia, MD**

**(Address of principalexecutive offices of the issuing entity)**

**21045**

**(Zip Code)**

**Registrant’s telephone number,including area code:**

**(212) 250-2500**

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
|---------------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| None                |              |                                      |

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of theAct:  None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-knownseasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required tofile reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filedall reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has beensubject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  ⌧ Yes oNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submittedelectronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant toRule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit such files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smallerreporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “largeaccelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large acceleratedfiler        o                                                                                                       Acceleratedfiler                                     o

Non-acceleratedfiler          ⌧  (Do not check ifa smaller reporting company)                          Smaller reportingcompany                    o

                                                                                                                                                       Emerging growthcompany                    o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if theregistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complyingwith any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed areport on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectivenessof its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of theSarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firmthat prepared or issued its audit report. o

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of theAct, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrantincluded in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issuedfinancial statements. o

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error correctionsare restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-basedcompensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during therelevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o Yes ⌧ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-votingcommon equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price atwhich the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price ofsuch common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s mostrecently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed alldocuments and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securitiesunder a plan confirmed by a court.  oYes oNo

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of theregistrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE**

** **

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated byreference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) intowhich the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders;(2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuantto Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documentsshould be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report tosecurity holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

 

** **

**EXPLANATORY NOTES**

The Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 10.5% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date, is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loancombination that includes the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan and three other *paripassu* loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. This loancombination, including the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan, is being servicedand administered pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which isincorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on theExhibit Index) with respect to the Heartland Industrial Portfolio MortgageLoan, which constituted approximately 3.2% of the asset pool of the issuingentity as of its cut-off date.  The Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loancombination that includes the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan andtwo other *pari passu* loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity.A *pari passu* portion of the loan combination was securitized in the COMM2015-CCRE25 Mortgage Trust transaction, Commission File Number 333-193376-22(the “COMM 2015-CCRE25 Transaction”). This loan combination, includingthe Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, is being serviced andadministered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM2015-CCRE25 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 tothis Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on theExhibit Index) with respect to the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 6.4% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date.  The 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan is an asset of theissuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the 11 MadisonAvenue Mortgage Loan, fifteen other *pari passu* loans and threesubordinate companion loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. A *paripassu* portion of the loan combination was securitized in the MAD 2015-11MDMortgage Trust transaction (the “MAD 2015-11MD Transaction”). This loancombination, including the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, is being servicedand administered pursuant to the trust and servicing agreement for the MAD2015-11MD Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 tothis Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The master servicer of a poolingand servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement also functions as theprimary servicer of the related mortgage loans serviced and administeredpursuant to such agreement unless a separate primary servicer is identifiedherein.  If this report does not identify a separate primary servicer, theservicer compliance statement provided by the master servicer under any suchagreement also encompasses its responsibilities as primary servicer of therelated mortgage loan or mortgage loans.

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation is the master servicer and certificate administrator of themortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and theprimary servicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan. As aresult, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined inItem 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above,because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of theassets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reportsand servicer compliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark is an affiliate of Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending L.P., one ofthe sponsors.  Therefore, the Depositor included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K a servicer compliance statement for Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark pursuant to Item 1123.  Because Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark is servicing less than 5% of the pool assets, an assessment of compliancewith applicable servicing criteria and an accountants’ attestation reportpursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not required by Regulation AB. As the attestation made in the servicer compliance statement required by Item1123 relates to a review of the servicing activities of Berkeley Point CapitalLLC d/b/a Newmark under the applicable servicing agreement, and that review wasconducted in conjunction with the servicer’s preparation of its assessment ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria, that assessment of compliancewith applicable servicing criteria and the accompanying accountants’attestation report are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the sakeof completeness.

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation acts as trustee of  the mortgage loans serviced under thePooling and Servicing Agreement, the Heartland Industrial Portfolio MortgageLoan and the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan.  Pursuant to the Pooling andServicing Agreement, the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM2015-CCRE25 Transaction and the trust and servicing agreement for the MAD2015-11MD Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessment ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria solely with respect to Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guaranteesregarding collections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or otherfees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified inthe transaction agreements). However, during the reporting period, the trusteedid not perform any servicing function with respect to the servicing criteriaspecified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.  The master serviceror the special servicer, to the extent required, performed the servicingfunction identified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, andeach such party included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in theassessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountant’sattestation report for the subject transaction.  As a result, this AnnualReport on Form 10-K does not include an assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria of the trustee. One or more other servicersof  the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan have delivered one or more assessments of compliance with respectto Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria andaccountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Solutions, LLC.  Thisentity was engaged by the master servicer under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement (except with respect to those mortgage loans for which Berkeley PointCapital LLC d/b/a Newmark is the primary servicer)  and the primaryservicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan to remit taxpayments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers to local taxing authorities,to report tax amounts due, to verify tax parcel information, and to verifynon-escrow tax payments. These servicing functions are included within theservicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) ofRegulation AB.  Therefore, under the principles-based definition of“servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB that looks to thefunctions that an entity performs, this vendor is a “servicer” for the purposesof Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  *See* Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations,Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria,accountants’ attestation report and servicer compliance statement fromComputershare Trust Company, National Association (“CTCNA”).  CTCNAwas engaged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”),in its capacity as certificate administrator and custodian, to perform certainspecified servicing functions identified in the assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports.  WellsFargo engaged CTCNA in connection with the sale of Wells Fargo’s corporatetrust services business to CTCNA and its affiliates.  Further, under theprinciples-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) ofRegulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, this partyis a “servicer” for the purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB.  SeeCompliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

Theassessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’attestation reports and servicer compliance statements of the certificateadministrator of the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan and the HeartlandIndustrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan are omitted from this Annual Report on Form10-K as the certificate administrator pursuant to the related pooling andservicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement does not perform anyactivities that address servicing criteria with respect to the issuing entityand because they are each not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.

With respect to the *pari passu*loan combinations that include the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loanand the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, (i) the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria and attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria of LNR Partners, LLC as special servicer ofthe Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas as custodian of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan andPentalpha Surveillance LLC as operating advisor of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K as they are not required to be included on thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K per Instruction 3 to Item 1122 of Regulation ABbecause they are parties performing activities that address servicing criteriarelating to 5% or less of the assets of the issuing entity; and (ii) theservicer compliance statements of LNR Partners, LLC as special servicer of theHeartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan and KeyBank National Associationas primary servicer and special servicer of the 11 Madison Avenue MortgageLoan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form10-K as they are not required by Item 1123 of Regulation AB to be included onthis Annual Report on Form 10-K because they are each an unaffiliated partythat is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through(iii) of Regulation AB.

**PART I**

**Item 1.  Business.**

Omitted.

**Item 1A.  Risk Factors.**

Omitted.

**Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.**

None.

**Item 2.  Properties.**

Omitted.

**Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.**

Omitted.

**Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.**

Not applicable.

**PART II**

**Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.**

Omitted.

**Item 6.**

[Reserved].

**Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations.**

Omitted.

**Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosuresAbout Market Risk.**

Omitted.

**Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements WithAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.**

Omitted.

**Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.**

Omitted.

**Item 9B.  Other Information.**

None.

**Item 9C.  Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictionsthat Prevent Inspections.**

None.

**PART III**

**Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and CorporateGovernance.**

Omitted.

**Item 11.  Executive Compensation.**

Omitted.

**Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain BeneficialOwners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.**

Omitted.

**Item 13.  Certain Relationships and RelatedTransactions, and Director Independence.**

Omitted.

**Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services.**

Omitted.

**ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB**

**Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant ObligorFinancial Information.**

The Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan(Loan Number 1 on Annex A-1 of the prospectus supplement of the registrantrelating to the issuing entity filed on October 7, 2015 pursuant to Rule424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement. Inaccordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited netoperating income of the significant obligor was $42,863,224.59 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2022.

**Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant EnhancementProvider Financial Information.**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external creditenhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction as describedunder Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

**Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain DerivativesInstruments (Financial Information).**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides anyderivative instruments or other support for the certificates within thistransaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

**Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.**

The registrant knows of nomaterial pending legal proceeding involving the trust or any party related tothe trust, other than routine litigation incidental to the duties of thoserespective parties, and the following, with respect to Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as Certificate Administrator and Custodian, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Custodian, and CWCapitalAsset Management LLC, as Special Servicer.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas(“DBTCA”) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued byinvestors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certainresidential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. 

 

On June 18, 2014, a group of investors,including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., andothers, filed an action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Courtalleging that DBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties, as trusteesfor 544 private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations andwarranties as to mortgage loans held by the trusts and to enforce breaches byservicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from NewYork State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S.District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “*BlackRock*SDNYCase”) and the other in the Superior Court of California, Orange County (the “*BlackRock*California Case”).  Pursuant to a settlement among the parties, the *BlackRock*SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018, and the *BlackRock*CaliforniaCase was dismissed on January 11, 2019.

 

On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was addedas a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities includingPhoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern Districtof New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTCserved as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue.  On September 27,2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as adefendant in addition to DBNTC.  DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43trusts at issue.  DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts atissue.  Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation ofthe U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach offiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of New York’s StreitAct; and breach of the covenant of good faith.  However, in the thirdamended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to thecase, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and grossnegligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of goodfaith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffsonly include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal.  Plaintiffsallege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.”  On November 13,2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint.  OnDecember 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank AG (seedescription of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summaryjudgment.  On October 27, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a supplemental motionfor summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’ standing.  On February 8,2022, the court issued an order in which it granted DBNTC and DBTCA’ssupplemental motion for summary judgment, granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’sinitial motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partialsummary judgment.  As a result of that order, all of plaintiffs’ claimswere dismissed with prejudice. On March 10, 2022, plaintiffs filed a notice ofappeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit withrespect to the court’s orders on the motions to dismiss and for summaryjudgment.

 

On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was addedas a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S.District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbankpreviously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of thetrusts at issue.  On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amendedcomplaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC.  DBTCAserves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue.  DBNTC serves astrustee for the other 49 trusts at issue.  Commerzbank’s second amendedcomplaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach offiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of thecovenant of good faith.  However, in the second amended complaint,Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the courtdismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling andservicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach ofthe covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims topreserve any rights on appeal.  The second amended complaint alleges thatDBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollarsin losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in asum certain.  On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to thesecond amended complaint.  On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed amotion for summary judgment.  Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank,jointly with the *Phoenix Light*plaintiffs, filed a motion for partialsummary judgment.  On February 8, 2022, the courtissued an order in which it granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion forsummary judgment and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summaryjudgment.  As a result of that order, many of plaintiffs’ claims andtheories were dismissed with prejudice.  Discovery is ongoing.

 

On December 30, 2015, IKB International,S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”),as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the SupremeCourt of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA astrustees of the trusts.  On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaintasserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach ofduty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation ofthe TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the UniformCommercial Code.  IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for overU.S. $268 million in damages.  On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA,together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a jointmotion to dismiss.  On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKB voluntarilydismissed with prejudice all claims as to seven trusts.  On January 27, 2021, the court granted in part and deniedin part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss.  The court granted the motionto dismiss with respect to IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act,Regulation AB, and Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certainaspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, andviolation of the TIA.  The court denied the remainder of the motion todismiss.  IKB’s remaining claims for breachof contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts ofinterest, and violation of the TIA will proceed.  On May 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appealwith the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, regardingcertain aspects of the court’s order on the motion to dismiss.  On May 20,2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with respect to other aspects of thatorder.  On August 30, 2022, the New York Supreme Court, AppellateDivision, First Department affirmed in part and reversed in part the court’sorder on the motion to dismiss.  On November 10, 2022, the FirstDepartment granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court ofAppeals, and denied IKB’s separate motion for reargument and leave toappeal.  On June 2, 2021, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regardingcertain aspects of the court’s order on the motionto dismiss, which the court denied on August 3, 2021.  On May 13,2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint.  On October 28,2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudiceall claims as to seven additional trusts.  OnDecember 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing withprejudice all claims as to one additional trust.  On April 22, 2022,the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice allclaims as to 17 certificates at issue (including all claims as to 5 trusts),leaving 17 trusts at issue.  Discovery is ongoing.

 

It is DBTCA’s belief that it has nopending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, thelitigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affectits ability to perform its duties under the related servicing agreement.

In December 2014, Phoenix Light SFLimited (Phoenix Light) and certain related entities filed a complaint in theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York allegingclaims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in its capacity as trustee for a numberof residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) trusts. Complaints raisingsimilar allegations have been filed by Commerzbank AG in the Southern Districtof New York and by IKB International and IKB Deutsche Industriebank in New Yorkstate court. In each case, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,as trustee, caused losses to investors, and plaintiffs assert causes of actionbased upon, among other things, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify andenforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breachesof representations and warranties, notify investors of alleged events ofdefault, and abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events ofdefault. In July 2022, the district court dismissed Phoenix Light’s claims andcertain of the claims asserted by Commerzbank AG, and subsequently enteredjudgment in each case in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. In August 2022, PhoenixLight and Commerzbank AG appealed the district court’s decision to the UnitedStates Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Company previously settledtwo class actions filed by institutional investors and an action filed by theNational Credit Union Administration with similar allegations. In addition,Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC have filed substantially similarlawsuits in New York state court alleging Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee,failed to take appropriate actions upon learning of defective mortgage loandocumentation.

From time to time, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, a Delawarelimited liability company (“CWCAM”), is a party to lawsuits and other legalproceedings as part of its duties as a special servicer (e.g., enforcement ofloan obligations) and/or arising in the ordinary course of business. Other thanas set forth in the following paragraphs, there are currently no legalproceedings pending, and no legal proceedings known to be contemplated bygovernmental authorities, against CWCAM or of which any of its property is thesubject, that are material to the certificateholders. 

On December 17, 2015, U.S. Bank National Association, thetrustee under five pooling and servicing agreements for (i) Wachovia BankCommercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30, (ii) COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2,(iii) Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C31, (iv) ML-CFC CommercialMortgage Trust 2007-5 and (v) ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6 commenceda proceeding with the Second Judicial District Court of Ramsey County,Minnesota (the “State Court”) for a declaratory judgment as to the properallocation of certain proceeds (“Disputed Proceeds”) received by CWCAM inconnection with the sale of the Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Townproperty in New York, New York securing loans held by those trusts.  CWCAMwas the special servicer of such property.  The petition requests theState Court to instruct the trustee, the trust beneficiaries, and any otherinterested parties as to the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any, thatconstitute penalty interest and/or the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any,that constitute gain-on-sale proceeds, with respect to each trust.  OnFebruary 24, 2016, CWCAM made a limited appearance with the State Court to filea motion to dismiss this proceeding based on lack of jurisdiction, mootness,standing and forum non conveniens.  On July 19, 2016, the State Courtdenied CWCAM’s motion to dismiss.  On July 22, 2016, the action wasremoved to federal court in Minnesota (“Federal Court”).  On October 21,2016, the Federal Court held a hearing on the motion to transfer the action tothe United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNYCourt”), a motion to remand to state court and a motion to hear CWCAM’s requestfor reconsideration of the motion to dismiss.  On March 14, 2017, theFederal Court reserved the determination on the motion to hear CWCAM’s requestfor reconsideration of the motion to dismiss, denied the motion to remand thematter to state court and granted the motion to transfer the proceeding to theSDNY Court.  Cross motions for judgment on the pleadings were filed butthe SDNY Court was unable to decide the case based on the pleadings and theSDNY Court ordered discovery.  All fact discovery was completed inDecember, 2018 and expert discovery was completed on March 15, 2019.  Theparties submitted cross motions for summary judgment, and on March 19, 2020,the SDNY Court entered an opinion and order in which it granted summaryjudgment in CWCAM’s favor and held that CWCAM was entitled to the entire amountof penalty interest and that CWCAM’s determination of Yield Maintenance wascorrect.  In the 127-page opinion, the SDNY Court found for CWCAM on everyissue presented by the trustee’s petition, namely, that the funds in disputeconstitute penalty interest and yield maintenance, not gain-on-sale proceeds,and that the amount of penalty interest and yield maintenance was correctlycalculated. An appeal of the SDNY Court’s decision was taken on April 29,2020.  Oral argument on the appeal occurred on June 21, 2021.  OnJuly 14, 2022, the Second Circuit entered a decision affirming in part andreversing in part the SDNY Court’s decision and remanding to the SDNY Court forfurther proceedings.  The Second Circuit affirmed the SDNY’s Court holdingthat Penalty Interest and Yield Maintenance are paid before Gain-On-SaleProceeds.  The Second Circuit reversed and remanded for furtherproceedings that portion of the SDNY Court’s decision related to approximately$67.2 million in interest on advances.   On January 13, 2023, theparties entered into a settlement agreement, in which (among other things) theyagreed to stipulate that the amount of interest on advances that accrued on orbefore June 3, 2014 is $27.5 million, and that CWCAM would pay that amount intoescrow for distribution to certificateholders upon the entry of an order by theCourt approving the settlement.  U.S. Bank National Association, asTrustee for the trusts, provided notice of the settlement to all parties ininterest via a notice program approved by the Court.  A hearing on thesettlement is scheduled for March 16, 2023.

On December 1, 2017, a complaint against CWCAM and others wasfiled in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkstyled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., No.17-cv-9463 (the “Original Complaint”). The gravamen of the Original Complaint alleged breaches of a contract and fiduciary duties by CWCAM’saffiliate, CWCapital Investments LLC in its capacity as collateral manager forthe collateralized debt obligation transaction involving CWCapital Cobalt Vr,Ltd. In total, there are 14 counts pled in the Original Complaint. Of those 14,5 claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach offiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment. On May 23, 2018, the OriginalComplaint was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.   OnJune 28, 2018, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a substantially similar complaintin the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York styled asCWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., Index No.653277/2018 (the “New Complaint”).  The gravamen of the New Complaint isthe same as the previous complaint filed in the United State District Court forthe Southern District of New York.  In total there are 16 counts pled inthe New Complaint. Of those 16 counts, 5 claims were asserted against CWCAM foraiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment,1 count seeks a declaratory judgement that the plaintiff has the right toenforce the contracts in question and 1 count seeks an injunction requiring thedefendants to recognize the plaintiff as the directing holder for the trusts inquestion. On January 11, 2019, the plaintiff dismissed with prejudice thedeclaratory judgment and injunction counts.  The New Complaint and relatedsummons was not served on the defendants until July 13, 2018 and July 16,2018.  The plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction was denied bythe court on July 31, 2018.  On August 3, 2018, the defendants, includingCWCAM, filed a motion to dismiss the New Complaint in its entirety. On August20, 2019, the court entered an order granting defendants’ motion almost in itsentirety, dismissing 11 of the 16 counts and partially dismissing 2 additionalcounts.  Of the remaining counts, 2 are asserted against CWCAM for aidingand abetting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  On September19, 2019, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed a notice of appeal relating to theAugust 20, 2019 dismissal order and on September 26, 2019, filed an amendedcomplaint against CWCI and CWCAM attempting to address deficiencies relating tocertain of the claims dismissed by the August 20, 2019 order.  CWCI andCWCAM filed its Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint on October 28,2019.  The court heard argument on the Motion to Dismiss the amendedcomplaint on January 22, 2020 and on October 23, 2020, the court granted themotion dismissing the amended claims.  On November 30, 2020, CWCapitalCobalt Vr Ltd filed a notice of appeal relating to the October 23, 2020dismissal order.  On April 27, 2021, the First Department affirmed thedismissal as to claims against CWCAM that were part of the August 20, 2019dismissal, but reversed the dismissal of two counts for breach of theCollateral Management Agreement against CWCI.  CWCI sought leave to filean appeal of the decision. The plaintiff also sought leave to appeal thedismissal of the claims against CWCAM.  Both requests for leave weredenied by the First Department.  On May 15, 2020, CWCI and CWCAM filed amotion to renew its motion to dismiss as to 4 of the remaining counts (includingthe remaining two counts against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach offiduciary duty and unjust enrichment), based on a decision entered by JudgeFailla in a trust instruction proceeding  in the US District Court for theSouthern District of New York awarding summary judgment in favor ofCWCAM.  On September 7, 2021, the court denied the motion to renew. CWCI and CWCAM filed a notice of appeal, which they perfected by the filing oftheir opening brief on July 1, 2022.  On November 15, 2022, the FirstDepartment affirmed the court’s denial of the motion to renew.  On October1, 2021, CWCI and CWCAM moved to reargue the denial of the motion to renew (oralternatively, the motion to dismiss) with respect to certain of Cobalt’sclaims, including the remaining 2 claims against CWCAM, based on the FirstDepartment’s April 27, 2021 decision.  On March 24, 2022, the court deniedthe relief sought in the motion to reargue.  CWCI and CWCAM have appealedthe court’s decision on the motion to reargue and filed their opening brief onJuly 11, 2022.  The appeal was dismissed as being non-appealable on August30, 2022.  CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under therelated pooling and servicing agreements in good faith and the remainingallegations in the New Complaint are without merit.

**Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and CertainRelationships and Related Transactions.**

The information regarding this Item has been previouslyprovided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuingentity filed on October 7, 2015 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).

**Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria.**

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attachedhereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as ScheduleII to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entitiesparticipating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for eachapplicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the poolingand servicing agreement for the COMM 2015-CCRE25 Transaction, are attachedhereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as ScheduleII to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2015-CCRE25 Transactionincorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K isa chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for theCOMM 2015-CCRE25 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan,which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the trust and servicingagreement for the MAD 2015-11MD Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule I to the trust andservicing agreement for the MAD 2015-11MD Transaction incorporated by referenceas Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying theentities participating in a servicing function for the MAD 2015-11MDTransaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d).

The report on assessment of compliance for the twelvemonths ended December 31, 2022, furnished pursuant to Item 1122 of RegulationAB by KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”), as servicer, discloses that thefollowing material instance of noncompliance occurred with respect to its platform:

The examination performed by Ernst & Young LLP identifiedan instance of material noncompliance with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d)(4)(ix) of Regulation AB applicable to KeyBank during the yearended December 31, 2022. During compliance testing, it was discovered, that notall FlexARM loan mortgagors were offered loan rates within 45-60 days beforethe rate change date, as required per the related pool asset documents. Per therelated note, if the holder fails to offer a loan rate within 45-60 days of anychange date a margin of 2.25% is to be used. Given the notification was notmade to the borrowers, a 3% margin was incorrectly applied. The noncompliancein Item 1122 (d)(4)(ix) is related to a servicing portfolio which is wholly ownedby the investor and is not held in a publicly traded security.

The following remediation procedures have been initiated byKeyBank: (i) the impacted mortgage loans are currently in the process of beingidentified, (ii) investor contact has been initiated, (iii) corrective actionsare being considered and will be tracked and monitored by senior management,(iv) procedures will be reviewed and revised, if necessary, to include newtracking and action steps to prevent this situation from recurring in the future,and (v) training will be provided to the relevant staff members to prevent arecurrence.

**Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.**

The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibitsto this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

**PART IV**

**Item 15. Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules.**

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part ofthis Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

(3) See below

4.1          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1,2015, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Reporton Form 8-K/A filed on December 8, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23and incorporated by reference herein).

4.2          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1,2015, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as a Special Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as aSpecial Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed asExhibit 99.6 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7,2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated by referenceherein).

4.3          Trust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 6,2015, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, KeyBank National Association, as Master Servicer and SpecialServicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian (filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-Kfiled on October 7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 andincorporated by reference herein).

31           Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

33           Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

33.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

33.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

33.3        Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted. See ExplanatoryNotes.)

33.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

33.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

33.6        Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor

33.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

33.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator

33.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian

33.10      Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark, asPrimary Servicer

33.11      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.12      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)

33.13      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Prudential PlazaMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.14      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.15      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)

33.16      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.17      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.18      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.19      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.20      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.21      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.22      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.23      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit33.7)

33.24      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer ofthe 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan

33.25      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicerof the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.24)

33.26      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.27      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.28      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian (see Exhibit 33.9)

34           Attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

34.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

34.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

34.3        Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted. See ExplanatoryNotes.)

34.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

34.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian

34.6        Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor

34.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

34.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator

34.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian

34.10      Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark, asPrimary Servicer

34.11      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.12      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)

34.13      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Prudential PlazaMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.14      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.15      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)

34.16      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participantof the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.17      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.18      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.19      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.20      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.21      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.22      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.23      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit34.7)

34.24      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicerof the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan

34.25      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicerof the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.24)

34.26      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.27      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.28      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian (see Exhibit 34.9)

35           Servicer compliance statements.

35.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

35.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

35.3        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

35.4        Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark, asPrimary Servicer

35.5        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator

35.6        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.7        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)

35.8        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.9        LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

35.10      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer of the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.) 

35.11      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer of the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

99.1         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of September28, 2015, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation andGerman American Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’sCurrent Report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 8, 2015 under Commission FileNo. 333-193376-23 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.2         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of September28, 2015, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation andCantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 8, 2015 underCommission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.3         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of September28, 2015, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation andJefferies LoanCore LLC (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant’s CurrentReport on Form 8-K/A filed on December 8, 2015 under Commission File No.333-193376-23 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.4         Primary Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2015,between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Berkeley Point Capital LLC(filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed onOctober 7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated byreference herein)

99.5         Co-lender Agreement, dated as of September 6, 2015,between German American Capital Corporation, as Initial Note A-1 Holder, MorganStanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note A-2 Holder, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Initial Note A-3 Holder, German American Capital Corporation,as Initial Note B-1 Holder, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note B-2Holder, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Initial Note B-3 Holder(filed as Exhibit 99.7 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed onOctober 7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated byreference herein)

99.6         Co-lender Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2015, betweenGerman American Capital Corporation, as Note A-1 Holder, German AmericanCapital Corporation, as Note A-2 Holder, and German American CapitalCorporation, as Note A-3 Holder (filed as Exhibit 99.8 to the registrant’sCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2015 under Commission File No.333-193376-23 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.7         Co-lender Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2015, betweenGerman American Capital Corporation, as Note A-1 Holder, German AmericanCapital Corporation, as Note A-2 Holder, German American Capital Corporation,as Note A-3 Holder, and German American Capital Corporation, as Note A-4 Holder(filed as Exhibit 99.9 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed onOctober 7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated byreference herein)

(b)   The exhibits required to be filed by theRegistrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above.

(c)    Not Applicable.

 

**SIGNATURES**

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation(Depositor)

/s/ HelaineM. Kaplan

Helaine M.Kaplan, President

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)

Date: March 14, 2023

/s/ MattSmith

Matt Smith, Director

Date: March 14, 2023