alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued November 20 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00 699
- CR

——————————— THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appella nt

V. NICHOLAS GEARY , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 155th District Court

Austin County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2014R
- 0041

MEMORANDUM OPINION On October 27 , 2014, appellant, the State of Texas (by and through its District Attorney for Austin County) filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion to dismiss complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and no2

prior decision has issued in this case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.
On N ovember 1 2 , 2014, appell ee filed a motion requesting that we expedite consideration of this matter. Although not specifically mentioned in appell ee ’s motion, we consider the motion as a request to expedite issuance of the mandate in this appeal. Because th e motion to expedite demonstrates good cause to expedite issuance of the mandate, we grant the motion and the C lerk of this Court is directed to issue the mandate immediately. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 18.1(c). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER C URIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b ).
#### §§ 1.45U-1-1.45U-2 [Reserved]
ANDES 7 Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofANDES 7 Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew Khor Poh Kiang, Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Andrew Khor Poh Kiang and will be retained by ANDES 7 Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

  

 

Dated: April 16, 2018

 

 

By: /s/ Andrew Khor Poh Kiang

Andrew Khor Poh Kiang

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

ANDES 7 Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofANDES 7 Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Kok Keing, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Lee Kok Keing, and will be retained by ANDES 7 Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

  

 

Dated: April 16, 2018

 

 

By: /s/ Lee Kok Keing

Lee Kok Keing

Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2015034EN.01003901.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/39

---

Action brought on 12 November 2014 — Comber v Commission

(Case T-752/14)

(2015/C 034/46)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Comber SA (Lausanne, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Heel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission Decision of 16 July 2014 (REM 05/2013) on the refusal of the application for remission of import duties amounting to EUR 4 61  415,12; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission Decision of 16 July 2014 (REM 05/2013) on the refusal of the application for remission of import duties amounting to EUR 4 61  415,12;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant submits that the post-clearance customs duties for the import of linen fabric from Latvia in the years 1999 to 2002 must be remitted in accordance with Article 239 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) due to the presence of special circumstances. The applicant cites as special circumstances serious breaches of obligations by the Latvian customs authorities, serious breaches of obligations by the European Commission/OLAF and serious misconduct of the German customs authorities. In the applicant’s view, those circumstances cannot be attributed to obvious negligence on its part.

---
#### Adams *v.*Bishop *et al.*

No. 8421.

February 9, 1932.

*Lowndes Calhoun*and *M. Smith,*for plaintiff: in error.

*Lawrence S. Camp, H. F. Sharp,*and *Frank T. Grizzard,*contra.

Hill, J.

An applicant for homestead and exemption applied to have certain realty and personalty set aside to him as an exemption on the ground that he is “aged and infirm,” under the Civil Code (1910), § 3377; and certain creditors filed objections to the grant of the homestead, on the ground that the title to the property is not in the applicant, or that he has made a conveyance of it. *Held,*that the title to the property in which a homestead is sought to be set aside is not directly involved, and therefore the question raised by the application and objections urged by a creditor of the applicant is not one respecting title to land, so as to confer jurisdiction on the Supreme Court as provided in the constitution of this State. See Ga. E. 1916, p. 19. The questions involved in the present case are within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, and not of the Supreme Court; and therefore the case is transferred to the former court for consideration and determination. See *Colley*v. *A. & W. P. R. Co.,*156 *Ga.*43 (118 S. E. 712).

*Transferred to the Court of Appeals.*

*All the Justices conowr.*
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.6



     Extension of the BGA IMMUNITY AGREEMENT entered into October 18, 1996
           between Motorola, Inc. and ST Assembly Test Services, Ltd.



Motorola Inc. and ST Assembly Services, Ltd. agree to extend the term of
above-identified IMMUNITY AGREEMENT for an extension period from January 1, 2003
until March 31, 2003.

Any royalty payments due Motorola Inc. by ST Assembly Test Services, Ltd. during
the extension period will be calculated at a royalty rate offered under the
terms of a renewed IMMUNITY AGREEMENT made between Motorola and ST Assembly
Services, Ltd.

All other terms and condition of the above-identified IMMUNITY AGREEMENT remain
the same.

Indicating their agreement to the foregoing, the parties have hereto executed
this extension of the above-identified IMMUNITY AGREEMENT in duplicate.



Motorola, Inc.                              ST Assembly Test Services, Ltd.

By     :   /s/ Paul Riedy                   By      :   /s/ Linda Nai
           -------------------------                    -----------------------

Title  :   Director, IP Licensing           Title   :   Director, Legal
           -------------------------                    -----------------------

Date   :   1/2/03                           Date    :   December 23, 2002
           -------------------------                    -----------------------
# C_2016068EN.01002602.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/26

---

Order of the General Court of 17 December 2015 — Universal Music v OHIM — Yello Strom (Yellow Lounge)

(Case T-379/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 068/34)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Universal Music GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Viefhus, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: G. Schneider, and subsequently by: G. Schneider and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Yello Strom GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: K. Gründig-Schnelle, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2014 (Case R 274/2013-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Yello Strom GmbH and Universal Music GmbH.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action.

| 2. | Universal Music GmbH and Yello Strom GmbH shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Universal Music GmbH and Yello Strom GmbH shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014.

1

---
#### § 1.1348-1 Fifty-percent maximum tax on earned income.

Section 1348 provides generally that for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1971, the maximum tax rate applicable to the earned taxable income of an individual, estate, or trust is not to exceed 50 percent. In the case of an estate or trust, earned income includes only amounts which constitute income in respect of a decedent within § 1.1348-3(a)(4). For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1970, and before January 1, 1972, the maximum rate is 60 percent. Section 1348 does not apply if the taxpayer chooses the benefits of income averaging under sections 1301 through 1305. Section 1348 does not apply to a married individual who does not file a joint return with his spouse for the taxable year. For purposes of section 1348, an individual's marital status shall be determined under section 153 and the regulations thereunder.

[T.D. 7446, 41 FR 55337, Dec. 20, 1976]
#### Esen Corporation *v.*Emses, Inc., et al.

Argued March 5

decided March 5, 1968

*Richard G. Shechtman,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

The application by the law firm of Ribicoff and Kotkin to withdraw its appearance for the plaintiff in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted.
I n c o r p o r a t i o n b y R e f e r e n ce D o c k e t I D N o
. E P A

- HQ

- O AR

- 2009

- 0927

Ja nu a r y 7 , 2010

T h e c o n t e n t s o f t h e f

o l l o w i n g d o c k e t s a r e h e r e b y i n c o r po r a t e d b y r e f e r e n c e i n t o a n d a r e

c o n s i d e r e d t o b e i n c l ud e d i n , c o n t a i n e d i n a n d t o h a v e b e e n p l ace d i n D o c k e t E P A

- HQ

- O A R2009

- 0927 ( G r ee nh o u s e G a s R e p o r t i n g f o r A d d it i o n a l S o u r ce s o f F l u o r i n a t e d G a s e s ) :

1) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2008

- 0508 ( G r ee n h o u s e G a s M a nd a t o r y R e p o r t i n g ) 2) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2009

- 0924 ( D e t e r mi n a t i o n o f C o n f i d e n t i a l B u s i n e ss I n f

o r m a t i o n ) 3) E P A

- HQ

- O A R

- 2009

- 0925 ( C o r p o r a t e P a r e n t a n d N A I C S C o d e )

A c c e ss i n g d o c k e t s : P ub l i c l y a v a il a b l e d o c k e t m a t e r i a l s a r e a v a i l a b l e e i t h e r e l e c t r o n i c a ll y t h r o ug h

www

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g ov o r i n h a r d c o p y a t E P A ’ s D o c k e t C e n t e r , P ub li c R ea d i ng R oo m , E P A W e s t B u il d i ng , R o o m 3334

, 1301 C o n s t i t u t i o n A v e n u e , N W

, Wa s h i ng t o n , D C 2000 4

. T h i s D o c k e t F a c il i t y i s o p e n f

r o m 8 : 30 a

. m

. t o 4 : 3 0 p

. m ., M o n d a y t h r o ug h F r i d a y , e x c l

u d i ng l e g a l h o li d a y s

. T h e t e l e p h o n e n u m

b e r f o r t h e P ub li c R e a d i n g R o o m i s ( 202 ) 566

- 1744

, a n d t h e t e l e p h o n e

n u m b e r f o r t h e A i r D o c k e t i s ( 202 ) 566

- 174 2

.
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3830 Endodontic paper point. ( a ) *Identification.* An endodontic paper point is a device made of paper intended for use during endodontic therapy to dry, or apply medication to, the root canal of a tooth.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 13830, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38798, July 25, 2001]
§ 1.182-6 Election to deduct land clearing expenditures. ( a ) *Manner of making election.* The election to deduct expenditures for land clearing provided by section 182(a) shall be made by means of a statement attached to the taxpayer's income tax return for the taxable year for which such election is to apply. The statement shall include the name and address of the taxpayer, shall be signed by the taxpayer (or his duly authorized representative), and shall be filed not later than the time prescribed by law for filing the income tax return (including extensions thereof) for the taxable year for which the election is to apply. The statement shall also set forth the amount and description of the expenditures for land clearing claimed as a deduction under section 182, and shall include a computation of “taxable income derived from farming”, if the amount of such income is not the same as the net income from farming shown on Schedule F of Form 1040, increased by the amount of the deduction claimed under section 182.
( b ) *Scope of election.* An election under section 182(a) shall apply only to the taxable year for which made. However, once made, an election applies to all expenditures described in § 1.182-3 paid or incurred during the taxable year, and is binding for such taxable year unless the district director consents to a revocation of such election. Requests for consent to revoke an election under section 182 shall be made by means of a letter to the district director for the district in which the taxpayer is required to file his return, setting forth the taxpayer's name, address and identification number, the year for which it is desired to revoke the election, and the reasons therefor. However, consent will not be granted where the only reason therefor is a change in tax consequences.
[T.D. 6794, 30 FR 791, Jan. 26, 1965]
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 2920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-875]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6873]

In the Matter of the Designation of Nasir al-Wahishi, Also Known 
as Abu Basir, Also Known as Abu Basir Nasir al-Wahishi, Also Known as 
Naser Abdel Karim al-Wahishi, Also Known as Nasir Abd al-Karim al-
Wuhayshi, Also Known as Abu Basir Nasir al-Wuhayshi, Also Known as 
Nasser Abdul-karim Abdullah al-Wouhichi, Also Known as Abu Baseer al-
Wehaishi, Also Known as Abu Basir Nasser al-Wuhishi as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Nasir al-Wahishi, 
and also known as Abu Basir, also known as Abu Basir Nasir al-Wahishi, 
also known as Naser Abdel Karim al-Wahishi, also known as Nasir Abd al-
Karim al-Wuhayshi, also known as Abu Basir Nasir al-Wuhayshi, also 
known as Nasser Abdul-karim Abdullah al-Wouhichi, also known as Abu 
Baseer al-Wehaishi, also known as Abu Basir Nasser al-Wuhishi 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 14, 2009.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-875 Filed 1-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8052 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8052

To temporarily apply the E10 Reid vapor pressure limitations to E15 in 
  the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, 
                      South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2024

Mr. Nunn of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Finstad, Mr. 
Bacon, Ms. Budzinski, and Mr. Sorensen) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To temporarily apply the E10 Reid vapor pressure limitations to E15 in 
  the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, 
                      South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Year-Round E15 Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY APPLICABILITY OF E10 REID VAPOR PRESSURE LIMITATIONS 
              TO E15.

    During the period that begins on May 1, 2024, and ends on September 
15, 2024, in the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, 
Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin, the Reid vapor pressure 
limitations applicable to fuel blends containing gasoline and 15 
percent denatured anhydrous ethanol under subsections (f) and (h) of 
section 211 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545) (including any waiver 
thereunder) shall be the same as any such limitations applicable to 
fuel blends containing gasoline and 10 percent denatured anhydrous 
ethanol under such subsections.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed February 14, 2017

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 16

- 00968

- CR

____________

GUADALUPE WALLY RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1481921



### ORDER

On January 10, 2017 , this court issued an order to the Harris County District

Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record by January 20, 2017 . The court has not

received the supplemental clerk’s record.

Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is ordered to file the ordered

supplemental record by February 24, 2017 , containing the following document: the

judgment

.2

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to

file a supplemental clerk’s record in each appeal containing a certified statement that

the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050003
- 00060004
- 00070005
- 00080006
- 00090007
- 00100008
- 00110000
- 00120000
- 00130000
- 00140000
- 00150009
- 00160010
- 00170000
- 00180000
- 00190011
- 00200012
- 00210000
- 00220000
- 00230013
- 00240014
- 00250000
- 00260000
- 00270000
- 00280000
- 00290015
- 00300016
- 00310017
- 00320018
- 00330000
- 00340000
- 00350019
- 00360020
- 00370000
- 00380000
- 00390021
- 00400000
- 00410022
- 00420000
- 00430000
- 00440000
- 00450023
- 00460000
- 004700bi
- 004800bc