alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            Oct-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              Jun-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          1,615
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                      249
<INVENTORY>                                    14,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,221
<PP&E>                                         25,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                  7,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 62,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           9,589
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         1
<COMMON>                                          180
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   62,070
<SALES>                                        49,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               49,757
<CGS>                                          35,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  43,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,552
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,072
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (160)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.15
        


</TABLE>
608 P.2d 64

#### The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Bobby Ray DIXON, Appellant.

No. 2 CA-CR 1878.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Jan. 7, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 19, 1980.

Review Denied March 11, 1980.

Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen., by Bruce M. Ferg, Tucson, for appellee.

William L. Scholl, Tucson, for appellant.

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant pled no contest to the crime of criminal damage, a class 6 felony, and admitted a prior felony conviction. He was sentenced to the presumptive sentence of 2.25 years imprisonment in the custody of the' Department of Corrections, as provided in the agreement.

The sole contention on appeal is that the court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea. Appellant attempts to denigrate the validity of his plea because he did not know that it could only be withdrawn to correct a manifest injustice. He would impose a duty upon the trial court, before accepting a plea, to so advise him because the written plea agreement implies a “right” to withdraw a plea. We do not so construe the agreement nor do we find that an inability to withdraw a plea is a consequence of which the court must advise. The record reflects a voluntary, knowing and intelligent plea. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion as no manifest injustice was shown.

Affirmed.

HOWARD and RICHMOND, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15
                                                                      ----------

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER


May 11, 1998


Essef Corporation and Subsidiaries
220 Park Drive
Chardon, Ohio


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Essef Corporation and Subsidiaries for the periods ended March
31, 1998 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated April 20, 1998; because we
did not do an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-17758 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.






DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Cleveland, Ohio











                                  Page 16 of 16
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.2360 Selective culture medium. ( a ) *Identification.* A selective culture medium is a device that consists primarily of liquid or solid biological materials intended for medical purposes to cultivate and identify certain pathogenic microorganisms. The device contains one or more components that suppress the growth of certain microorganisms while either promoting or not affecting the growth of other microorganisms. The device aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms and also provides epidemiological information on these diseases.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 25046, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38791, July 25, 2001]
39350.

#### ALTAMAHA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION v. IRVIN.

Jordan, Judge.

The writ of error in the present case excepts to the order of the trial court of November 24, 1961, in which *826the defendant’s general demurrer and one ground of special demurrer were overruled and one ground of special demurrer was sustained. In this order the plaintiff was given leave to amend to meet the defendant’s special demurrer, but no further judgment appears to have been rendered by the trial court and there is no assignment of error on any subsequent judgment. *Held:*

Decided April 20, 1962

Rehearing denied April 26, 1962.

*Sharpe & Sharpe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Nat 0. Carter, W. T. Darby,*contra.

*Miller, Miller & Miller,*amicus curiae.

Under the mandate of Ga. L. 1952, p. 243 *(Code Ann.*§ 81-1001) as construed and followed by this court and the Supreme Court in numerous cases (see, for example: *Myers v. Grant,*212 Ga. 182, 91 SE2d 335; *Jacoby v. Jacoby,*212 Ga. 295, 92 SE2d 7; *Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Williams,*95 Ga. App. 67, 96 SE2d 637; *Motels, Inc. v. Shadrick,*96 Ga. App. 464, 100 SE2d 592; *Rich’s, Inc. v. Denmon,*100 Ga. App. 694, 112 SE2d 234), the writ of error in the instant case is premature and must be

*Dismissed.*

*Nichols, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8057 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8057

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, as the ``Little Saigon 
              Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2024

    Mrs. Steel (for herself, Mr. Schiff, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. 
    Sherman, Mr. Issa, Mr. Valadao, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. 
Obernolte, Mr. Costa, Mr. Gomez, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Duarte, Mr. Harder of 
     California, Ms. Chu, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Correa, Mr. 
 DeSaulnier, Mr. Mike Garcia of California, Mr. Levin, Mr. Thompson of 
California, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Robert Garcia of California, Mr. Carbajal, 
   Ms. Jacobs, Mr. Peters, Ms. Kamlager-Dove, Mr. Lieu, Mrs. Kim of 
   California, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Vargas, Ms. Brownley, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. 
 McClintock, Mr. Kiley, Ms. Barragan, and Mr. Aguilar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, as the ``Little Saigon 
              Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LITTLE SAIGON VIETNAM WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Little Saigon Vietnam War Veterans Memorial 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Little 
Saigon Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014112EN.01005401.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/54

---

Action brought on 12 February 2014 — TrekStor v OHIM — Scanlab (iDrive)

(Case T-105/14)

2014/C 112/70

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: TrekStor Ltd (Hong Kong, Hong Kong) (represented by: M. Alber, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Scanlab AG (Puchheim, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 December 2013 in Case R 2330/2012-1 to the effect that the mark ‘iDrive’ is allowed to proceed to registration in its entirety and that the opposing party’s opposition is rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 December 2013 in Case R 2330/2012-1 to the effect that the mark ‘iDrive’ is allowed to proceed to registration in its entirety and that the opposing party’s opposition is rejected;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘iDrive’ for goods in Class 9 (Community trade mark application No 10 267 573)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Scanlab AG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national word mark ‘IDRIVE’ for goods and services in Classes 9 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article [42](5) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-SG1 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, WilmingtonTrust, National Association, as Trustee, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC(f/k/a TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), as Trust Advisor prior to November7, 2022, BellOak, LLC, as Trust Advisor on and after November 7, 2022, CoreLogicSolutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant,PGIM Real Estate Loan Services, Inc. (formerly known as Prudential AssetResources, Inc.), as Primary Servicer, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

Dated:March 13,2023

 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

RODOLFO ENRIQUE JIMÉNEZ, § 

ASDRÚBAL CHAVEZ, IRIS § 

MEDINA, MARCOS ROJAS, JOSÉ § No. 399, 2019 

ALEJANDRO ROJAS, and § 

FERNANDO DE QUINTAL, § Court Below – Court of Chancery 

 § of the State of Delaware 

 Plaintiffs/Counterclaim § 

Defendants Below/ § 

 Appellants, § C.A. No. 2019-0490 

 § 

 v. § 

 § 

LUISA PALACIOS, EDGAR § 

RINCÓN, FERNANDO VERA, § 

ELIO TORTOLERO, ANDRÉS § 

PADILLA, ÁNGEL OLMETA, § 

JAVIER TROCONIS, LUIS § 

URDANETA, and RICK ESSER, § 

 § 

 Defendants/Counterclaim § 

 Plaintiffs Below/ § 

 Appellees. § 

 

Submitted: July 8, 2020 

 Decided: July 22, 2020 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, 

Justices. 

ORDER 

 This 22nd day of July 2020, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record on appeal, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the 
final judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for 

the reasons stated in its August 12, 2019 opinion. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
§ 1.1377-3 Applicability dates. ( a ) *In general.* Except as otherwise provided in this section, §§ 1.1377-1 and 1.1377-2 apply to taxable years of an S corporation beginning after December 31, 1996.
( b ) *Certain conversions.* Section 1.1377-1(a)(2)(iii) and (c)(3) (*Example 3)* are applicable for taxable years beginning on and after May 14, 2002.
( c ) *Special treatment of distributions of money during post-termination transition period* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, § 1.1377-2(b) applies to taxable years beginning after October 20, 2020. For taxable years beginning on or before October 20, 2020, see § 1.1377-2(b) as contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2020.
( 2 ) *Taxable years beginning on or before October 20, 2020.* A corporation may choose to apply § 1.1377-2(b) to taxable years beginning on or before October 20, 2020 and with respect to which the period described in section 6501(a) has not expired. If a corporation makes the choice described in the previous sentence, all shareholders of the corporation must report consistently, and the corporation must adopt §§ 1.481-5, 1.1371-1, 1.1371-2, if an ETSC, and 1.1377-2(b) in their entity and continue to apply those rules in their entirety for the corporation's subsequent taxable years.
[T.D. 9914, 85 FR 66484, Oct. 20, 2020]
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    1.
    
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act; and2.
    
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Zix Corporation.
 /s/ RICHARD D. SPURRName:
    Richard D. SpurrTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ MICHAEL W. ENGLISHName:
    Michael W. EnglishTitle:
    Principal Accounting Officer
§ 1.1445-7 Treatment of foreign corporation that has made an election under section 897(i) to be treated as a domestic corporation. ( a ) *In general.* Pursuant to section 897(i) a foreign corporation may elect to be treated as a domestic corporation for purposes of sections 897 and 6039C. A foreign corporation that has made such an election shall also be treated as a domestic corporation for purposes of the withholding required under section 1445, in accordance with the provisions of this section.
( b ) *Withholding under section 1445(a)* — ( 1 ) *Dispositions by corporation.* A foreign corporation that has made an election under section 897(i) may provide a transferee with a certification of non-foreign status in connection with the corporation's disposition of a U.S. real property interest. However, in accordance with the provisions of §§ 1.1445-2(b)(2)(ii) and 1.1445-5(b)(3)(ii)(C), such an electing foreign corporation must attach to such certification a copy of the acknowledgment of the election provided to the corporation by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to § 1.897-3(d)(4) which states that the information required by § 1.897-3 has been determined to be complete.
( 2 ) *Dispositions of interests in corporation.* Dispositions of interests in electing foreign corporations shall be subject to the withholding requirements of section 1445(a) and the rules of §§ 1.1445-1 through 1.1445-4. Therefore, if a foreign person disposes of an interest in such a corporation, and that interest is a U.S. real property interest under the provisions of section 897 and regulations thereunder, then the transferee is required to withhold under section 1445(a).
( c ) *Withholding under section 1445(e).* Because a foreign corporation that has made an election under section 897(i) is treated as a domestic corporation for purposes of determining withholding obligations under section 1445, such a corporation is not subject to the requirement of section 1445(e)(2) that a foreign corporation withhold at the corporate capital gain rate from the gain recognized upon the distribution of a U.S. real property interest. Such a corporation is subject to the provisions of section 1445(e)(3). Thus, if interests in an electing corporation constitute U.S. real property interests, then the corporation is required to withhold with respect to the non-dividend distribution of any property to an interest-holder that is a foreign person. See § 1.1445-5(e). Dividend distributions (distributions that are described in section 301) shall be treated as provided in sections 897(f), 1441 and 1442. In addition, if interests in an electing foreign corporation do not constitute U.S. real property interests, then distributions by such corporation shall be treated as provided in sections 897(f) (if applicable), 1441 and 1442.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 545-0902) [T.D. 8113, 51 FR 46650, Dec. 24, 1986; 52 FR 3796, Feb. 6, 1987]
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1360 Radionuclide dose calibrator. ( a ) *Identification.* A radionuclide dose calibrator is a radiation detection device intended to assay radionuclides before their administration to patients.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

Confidential portions of this document indicated by ***** have been omitted and
filed separately with the Commission

TIFTON ALUMINUM COMPANY, INC.
P O Box 188
142 Tifton Drive
Delhi, Louisiana 71232

September 24, 2002

Mr. Gary Ihrke
V.P Operations
Featherlite Trailers
P O Box 320
Cresco, IA 52136

Dear Gary,

This letter will serve as confirmation of our agreement finalized today. ALCOA
has purchased, with your authorization, # pounds of aluminum for your extrusion
needs during the 3rd quarter of 2003. The extrusions will be purchased and
delivered from our Yankton plant at a base price of ***** per pound on solid
shapes and ***** per pound on hollow shapes. As per our previous agreements, any
side panels will require a ***** adder. All other adders will apply consistent
with our current agreements. We are reserving # pounds per week to support your
program. The prices and tonnage stated above are firm, as metal has been secured
to cover this contract. Thanks again for your business

Yours truly
Herb Grubbs
Regional Sales Mgr.

cc: Jan Mauch, Yankton
    Brian Plunk, Plant City
    File
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6260 Filtering facepiece respirator for use by the general public in public health medical emergencies. ( a ) *Identification.* A filtering facepiece respirator for use by the general public in public health medical emergencies is a device that is a disposable half-facepiece non-powered air-purifying particulate respirator intended for use to cover the nose and mouth of the wearer to help reduce wearer exposure to pathogenic biological airborne particulates during a public health medical emergency. The device is made of polymeric materials and is intended to fit closely to the face and to function by filtering particulate material.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls are: ( 1 ) Certification by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) as a non-powered air-purifying particulate respirator with a minimum filtration efficiency classification of N95, in accordance with 42 CFR part 84.
( 2 ) The FDA guidance document entitled: “Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Filtering Facepiece Respirator for use by the General Public in Public Health Medical Emergencies.” See § 880.1(e) for information on obtaining a copy of this guidance document.
[72 FR 36362, July 3, 2007]