alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Skip to main content-   
-  United States Department of Agriculture 
-  Forest Service 
-  **Hoosier National Forest** 
-   
-  			Forest Service Home 
-  			About the Agency 
-  			Contact the National Office 

Search
Search formSearch websiteGo-  Site Map 

Hoosier National Forest
-  Home 
-  Special Places 
-  Recreation 
-  Alerts & Notices 
-  Passes & Permits 
-  Maps & Publications 
-  Land & Resources Management    -  Planning 
  -  Projects 
  -  Resource Management 
  -  Geospatial Data
-  Learning Center 
-  Working Together 
-  About the Forest 
-  News & Events 

Contact Information

**Hoosier National Forest**	811 Constitution Avenue

	Bedford, IN 47421

	(812) 275-5987  or

	1-866-302-4173

	For deaf/hearing impaired,

	call 1-800-877-8339.

	Email:

Hoosier_Website

 

Contact Us
  Annual Reports
Each year the Hoosier National Forest publishes a Year in Review which summarizes the past year's accomplishments. The annual report is usually published in February or March.

	See past Issues:
-  2013-2014 Year in Review
-  2012 Year in Review
-  2011 Year in Review
-  2010 Year in Review
-  2009 Year in Review
-  2008 Year in Review
-  2007 Year in Review

Alerts & Warnings
- Firewood Ban 

						View All Forest Alerts   

Forest Service Home | USDA.gov | recreation.gov | USA.gov | Whitehouse.gov

Plug-Ins | FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Important Notices | Information Quality |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1.1561-1 General rules regarding certain tax benefits available to the component members of a controlled group of corporations. ( a ) *In general* — ( 1 ) —*Limitation.* Part II (section 1561 and following) of subchapter B of chapter 6 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) (part II) provides rules to limit the amounts of certain specified tax benefit items of component members of a controlled group of corporations for their tax years which include a particular December 31st date, or, in the case of a short taxable year member (see section 1561(b) and § 1.1561-2(e)), the date substituted for that December 31st date. The amount of the tax items enumerated in section 1561(a) available to any of the component members of a controlled group shall be determined for purposes of subtitle A of the Code as if the component members were a single corporation. Certain other tax items also set forth in section 1561(a) (for example, the additional tax imposed by section 11(b)(1) and the section 55(d)(3) phase out of the alternative minimum tax exemption amount) will be determined by combining the positive taxable income or positive alternative minimum taxable income of the component members of such a group and then allocating the amount of such items among those members.
( 2 ) *Definitions.* For certain definitions (including the definition of a *controlled group of corporations* and a *component member*) and special rules for purposes of this part II see section 1563.
( b ) *Special rules* — ( 1 ) *S Corporation.* For purposes of this part II, the term *corporation* includes a small business corporation (as defined in section 1361). However, for the treatment of such a corporation as an *excluded member* of a controlled group of corporations see § 1.1563-1(b)(2)(ii)(C).
( 2 ) *52-53-week taxable year.* In the case of corporations electing a 52-53-week taxable year under section 441(f)(1), the provisions of this part II shall be applied in accordance with the special rule of section 441(f)(2)(A). See § 1.441-2.
( c ) *Tax avoidance.* The provisions of this part II do not delimit or abrogate any principle of law established by judicial decision, or any existing provisions of the Code, such as sections 269, 482, and 1551, which serve to prevent any avoidance or evasion of income taxes.
( d ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to any tax year beginning on or after December 21, 2009. However, taxpayers may apply this section to any Federal income tax return filed on or after December 21, 2009. For tax years beginning before December 21, 2009, see § 1.1561-1T as contained in 26 CFR part 1 in effect on April 1, 2009.
[T.D. 9476, 74 FR 68532, Dec. 28, 2009]
**Exhibit 35.3**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE 

I, Karen Montbach, aManaging Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015 (the “Agreement”), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesInc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as operating advisor, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the “CertificateAdministrator”), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, the following: 

1.     A review of theCompany’s activities as Certificate Administrator during the reporting period ending December 31, 2016 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2016,the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

This statement is given bythe undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity. 

Date:    February 27,2017
#### Harry Bomstein *v.*Boucher Agency, Inc. Boucher Agency, Inc. *v.*Harry Bomstein

Submitted April 8

decided May 21, 1968

*Raphael Korff,*in support of the petition.

The petition by Boucher Agency, Inc., in each case for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
# C_2017402EN.01002101.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 October 2017 — Klement v OHIM — Bullerjan (Form of an oven)

(Case T-211/14 RENV) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Three-dimensional EU trade mark - Form of an oven - Genuine use of a mark - Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1), and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Nature of use of the mark - Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character))

(2017/C 402/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Toni Klement (Dippoldiswalde, Germany) (represented by J. Weiser, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by A. Schifko and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Bullerjan GmbH (Isernhagen-Kirchhorst, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2014 (Case R 927/2013-1) relating to revocation proceedings between Mr Klement and Bullerjan

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Toni Klement to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) before the General Court and the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Toni Klement to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) before the General Court and the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.

1

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40675 USDC No. C-95-CV-612

STEPHEN LLOYD TRAPP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; GARY JOHNSON, Deputy Director; JAMES ZELLER, Warden; J. GONZALES, Field Officer, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-612

- - - - - - - - - - March 17, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Stephen Lloyd Trapp, Texas inmate # 515234, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The PLRA requires a prisoner appealing IFP in a civil action to pay the full amount of the filing fee, $105. As TrappNo. 96-40675 - 2 - does not have funds, he is assessed no partial filing fee, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The agency having custody of Trapp’s inmate account shall collect the remainder of the $105 filing fee and forward for payment to the Clerk of the District Court for the Southern District of Texas in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) each time the amount in Trapp's account exceeds $10 until the appellate filing fee is paid. Trapp argues that he was denied access to the courts because prison officials interfered with his library time and because he was refused clerical materials to prepare legal documents. We have reviewed Trapp’s brief and the record and perceive no abuse of discretion by the district court. Trapp’s appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2. This is not the first civil rights suit filed by Trapp which has been dismissed as frivolous. See Trapp v. Scott , No. 96-40338 (Aug. 28, 1996). A prisoner may not

bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, , malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.No. 96-40675 - 3 - 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Including the dismissal of this appeal and the dismissal of the complaint from which appeal was taken, Trapp has three "strikes." See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387- 88 (5th Cir. 1996). Therefore, except for cases involving an imminent danger of serious physical injury, § 1915(g) bars Trapp from proceeding further under § 1915. He may proceed in subsequent civil cases under the fee provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1911-14 applicable to everyone else.
IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
§ 1.1033(b)-1 Basis of property acquired as a result of an involuntary conversion. ( a ) The provisions of the first sentence of section 1033(b) may be illustrated by the following example: Example: A's vessel which has an adjusted basis of $100,000 is destroyed in 1950 and A receives in 1951 insurance in the amount of $200,000. If A invests $150,000 in a new vessel, taxable gain to the extent of $50,000 would be recognized. The basis of the new vessel is $100,000; that is, the adjusted basis of the old vessel ($100,000) minus the money received by the taxpayer which was not expended in the acquisition of the new vessel ($50,000) plus the amount of gain recognized upon the conversion ($50,000). If any amount in excess of the proceeds of the conversion is expended in the acquisition of the new property, such amount may be added to the basis otherwise determined.
( b ) The provisions of the last sentence of section 1033(b) may be illustrated by the following example:
Example: A taxpayer realizes $22,000 from the involuntary conversion of his barn in 1955; the adjusted basis of the barn to him was $10,000, and he spent in the same year $20,000 for a new barn which resulted in the nonrecognition of $10,000 of the $12,000 gain on the conversion. The basis of the new barn to the taxpayer would be $10,000—the cost of the new barn ($20,000) less the amount of the gain not recognized on the conversion ($10,000). The basis of the new barn would not be a substituted basis in the hands of the taxpayer within the meaning of section 1016(b)(2). If the replacement of the converted barn had been made by the purchase of two smaller barns which, together, were similar or related in service or use to the converted barn and which cost $8,000 and $12,000, respectively, then the basis of the two barns would be $4,000 and $6,000, respectively, the total basis of the purchased property ($10,000) allocated in proportion to their respective costs (8,000/ 20,000 of $10,000 or $4,000; and 12,000/20,000 of $10,000, or $6,000).
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11910, Nov. 26, 1960; 25 FR 14021, Dec. 31, 1960. Redesignated and amended by T.D. 7625, 44 FR 31013, May 30, 1979]
§ 1.45Y-3 Rules relating to the increased credit amount for prevailing wage and apprenticeship. ( a ) *In general.* If any qualified clean electricity production facility satisfies the requirements in paragraph (b) of this section, the amount of the credit for producing clean electricity determined under section 45Y(a) is the alternative amount described in section 45Y(a)(2)(B), subject to adjustment provided by section 45Y(c).
( b ) *Qualified clean electricity production facility requirements.* A qualified facility satisfies the requirements of this paragraph (b) if it is one of the following— ( 1 ) A facility with a maximum net output of less than one megawatt (as measured in alternating current);
( 2 ) A facility the construction of which began prior to January 29, 2023; or
( 3 ) A facility that meets the prevailing wage requirements of section 45(b)(7) and § 1.45-7, the apprenticeship requirements of section 45(b)(8) and § 1.45-8, and the recordkeeping and reporting requirements of § 1.45-12 with respect to the construction, alteration, or repair of a qualified clean electricity production facility within the meaning of section 45Y.
( c ) *Applicability date.* This section applies to qualified clean electricity production facilities placed in service in taxable years ending after June 25, 2024, and the construction of which begins after June 25, 2024. Taxpayers may apply this section to qualified clean electricity production facilities placed in service in taxable years ending on or before June 25, 2024, and qualified clean electricity production facilities placed in service in taxable years ending after June 25, 2024, the construction of which begins before June 25, 2024, provided that taxpayers follow this section in its entirety and in a consistent manner.
[T.D. 9998, 89 FR 53272, June 25, 2024]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5049]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (Eastern Time) March 15, 2010.

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status: Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to be Considered 

Parts Open to the Public

    1. Approval of the minutes of the February 16, 2010, Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.
    b. Monthly Investment Performance Report.
    c. Legislative Report.

Parts Closed to the Public

    3. Proprietary Data.
    4. Proprietary Data.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: March 4, 2010.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-5049 Filed 3-5-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-02-009-CR

RICHARD DWAYNE ANDERSON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Richard Dwayne Anderson has appealed from his conviction for felony driving while intoxicated.  We will affirm.

	We have abated this appeal twice and both times directed the trial court to determine whether appellant desired to continue his appeal.  At the second abatement hearing, the trial court concluded that appellant had voluntarily absented himself from the hearing after having been notified of the hearing several times.  The trial court found that appellant had waived his appeal and recommended that the appeal be dismissed.  

	Thereafter, on November 13, 2002, we ordered appellant to file his brief by December 13, 2002.  We further ordered that we would consider and decide only those points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision because appellant, who is not indigent, had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record.  Appellant did not file a brief as ordered.  Therefore, on May 30, 2003, we notified appellant that the appeal would be submitted without briefs.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b); Horvath v. State, 884 S.W.2d 789, 790 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994, no pet.).  Having reviewed the record and found no unassigned fundamental error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.  See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	CAYCE, C.J.; DAY and LIVINGSTON, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 14, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.5100 Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Catheter. ( a ) *Standard PTCA Catheter* — ( 1 ) *Identification.* A PTCA catheter is a device that operates on the principle of hydraulic pressurization applied through an inflatable balloon attached to the distal end. A PTCA balloon catheter has a single or double lumen shaft. The catheter features a balloon of appropriate compliance for the clinical application, constructed from a polymer. The balloon is designed to uniformly expand to a specified diameter and length at a specific pressure as labeled, with well characterized rates of inflation and deflation and a defined burst pressure. The device generally features a type of radiographic marker to facilitate fluoroscopic visualization of the balloon during use. A PTCA catheter is intended for balloon dilatation of a hemodynamically significant coronary artery or bypass graft stenosis in patients evidencing coronary ischemia for the purpose of improving myocardial perfusion. A PTCA catheter may also be intended for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction; treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and/or post-deployment stent expansion.
( 2 ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document for Certain Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Catheters.” See § 870.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
( b ) *Cutting/scoring PTCA Catheter* — ( 1 ) *Identification.* A cutting/scoring PTCA catheter is a balloon-tipped catheter with cutting/scoring elements attached, which is used in those circumstances where a high pressure balloon resistant lesion is encountered. A cutting/scoring PTCA catheter is intended for the treatment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis for the purpose of improving myocardial perfusion. A cutting/scoring PTCA catheter may also be indicated for use in complex type C lesions or for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.
( 2 ) *Classification.* Class III (premarket approval). As of May 28, 1976, an approval under section 515 of the act is required before this device may be commercially distributed. See § 870.3.
[75 FR 54496, Sept. 8, 2010]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of BeiGene, Ltd., an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March 30,   2016 |                                                 |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | /s/ John V. Oyler                                    |
|                         | John V. Oyler                                        |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer   and Chairman               |
|                         |                                                 |
| Dated: March 30,   2016 | /s/ Howard Liang                                     |
|                         | Howard Liang                                         |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer   and Chief Strategy Officer |

 

----
#### Gertrude Dotolo *v.*Arthur J. Petrucelli, Sr.

Submitted May 17

decided June 25, 1968

*J ames M. S. Ullman,*in support of the petition.

*David Brown,*in opposition.

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.