alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 27, 2014

NO. 03-14-00436-CV

In the Matter of D. D. H.

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on June 11, 2014. Appellant has 

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > The National-Bank Act as Amended, The Federal Reserve Act, and Other Laws Relating to National Banks

              														The National-Bank Act as Amended, The Federal Reserve Act, and Other Laws Relating to National Banks, August 1917.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/434,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.5040 Suction lipoplasty system. ( a ) *Identification.* A suction lipoplasty system is a device intended for aesthetic body contouring. The device consists of a powered suction pump (containing a microbial filter on the exhaust and a microbial in-line filter in the connecting tubing between the collection bottle and the safety trap), collection bottle, cannula, and connecting tube. The microbial filters, tubing, collection bottle, and cannula must be capable of being changed between patients. The powered suction pump has a motor with a minimum of 1 ⁄ 3 horsepower, a variable vacuum range from 0 to 29.9 inches of mercury, vacuum control valves to regulate the vacuum with accompanying vacuum gauges, a single or double rotary vane (with or without oil), a single or double diaphragm, a single or double piston, and a safety trap.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). Consensus standards and labeling restrictions.
[63 FR 7705, Feb. 17, 1998]
- USGS Home
- Contact USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent publications 
    by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore          
        	 
  Explore recent publications 
    by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by Publication type and year
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by Publication type and year
- Documentation           
       	 
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology and ore deposits of the Tintic mining district, 
Utah, with a historical review

#### Professional Paper 107

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **Publisher Index Page**                          
        (html)
- Document: **Document**
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 35**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 36**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Study Area



#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility 
            FOIA 
            Privacy 
            Policies and Notices

U.S. 
Department of the Interior |                 U.S. Geological Survey                URL: 
http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp107 
                                    Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page                    Page Last Modified: August 28, 
2013 13:39:37
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3640 Shoulder joint metal/metal or metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A shoulder joint metal/metal or metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a shoulder joint. The device prevents dislocation in more than one anatomic plane and has components that are linked together. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a humeral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and a glenoid component made of this alloy or a combination of this alloy and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
( b ) *Classification.* Class III.
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before December 26, 1996 for any shoulder joint metal/metal or metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before December 26, 1996 been found to be substantially equivalent to a shoulder joint metal/metal or metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other shoulder joint metal/metal or metal/polymer constrained cemented prosthesis shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 50711, Sept. 27, 1996]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1414

DORA L. ADKINS, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

MERRIFIELD HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LP, 

Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, Senior District Judge. (1:22-cv-00399-AJT-IDD) 

Submitted: July 26, 2022 Decided: July 28, 2022

Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Dora L. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1414 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Dora L. Adkins appeals the district court’s orders denying her requests for leave to 

file an emergency complaint and an amended emergency complaint. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Adkins v. Merrifield Hotel Assocs., LP, No. 1:22-cv-00399-AJT-IDD 

(E.D. Va. Apr. 12 & 13, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1414 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification Pursuant To
Rules 13a-14(a) And 15d-14(a) Under The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934, As Amended
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation (the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: March 19, 2007
    /s/ Francis H. MurphyFrancis H. MurphyChief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.4270 Intraocular gas. ( a ) *Identification.* An intraocular gas is a device consisting of a gaseous fluid intended to be introduced into the eye to place pressure on a detached retina.
( b ) *Classification.* Class III.
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* As of May 28, 1976, an approval under section 515 of the act is required before this device may be commercially distributed. See § 886.3.
Exhibit 10.8






                                                                  Purchase Order

                               emoryWILSON Company
                               4110 Sheraton Court
                              GREENSBORO, NC 27410
                                                                     PO#: 044303
                                                                  Date: 03/24/03
                                                                  Page:        1
________________________________________________________________________________
Vendor:  HydroFlo, Inc.               Ship to:        City of Greensboro
         3721 Junction Blvd.             07           c/o Rock Creek Dairy P.S
         Raleigh, NC 27603            09-03           Rock Creek Dairy Road
                                                      Greensboro, NC
________________________________________________________________________________

BUYER       TERMS         SHIP VIA        FOB       FREIGHT         REFERENCE
 TOH     Net 7 Days          Truck                  Prepaid        SO DOC 073758
________________________________________________________________________________
ITEM #           DESCRIPTION                    UNITS       COST       EXTENSION

HydroFlo PLUS    250-20 PLUS System w/MTC-20      1       $68,735.00  $68,735.00
250-20           Saturator & Ox Generator

                 Attn:  Dennis Mast
                 Unit for Use At Rock Creek
                 Dairy Road, Greensboro, NC


                                                                          TOTAL

                                                                     $ 68,735.00
§ 898.14 Exemptions and variances. ( a ) A request for an exemption or variance shall be submitted in the form of a petition under § 10.30 of this chapter and shall comply with the requirements set out therein. The petition shall also contain the following: ( 1 ) The name of the device, the class in which the device has been classified, and representative labeling showing the intended uses(s) of the device;
( 2 ) The reasons why compliance with the performance standard is unnecessary or unfeasible;
( 3 ) A complete description of alternative steps that are available, or that the petitioner has already taken, to ensure that a patient will not be inadvertently connected to hazardous voltages via an unprotected patient cable or electrode lead wire for intended use with the device; and
( 4 ) Other information justifying the exemption or variance.
( b ) An exemption or variance is not effective until the agency approves the request under § 10.30(e)(2)(i) of this chapter.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 62 FR 25477, May 9, 1997, § 898.14 was stayed pending Office of Management and Budget approval of information collection and recordkeeping requirements.
Dear Sirs and or Madams,

Im writing you today to request an exemption for my interest in conducting aerial photography with an

off the shelf small UAS (Gross Weight 4 lb) 3DR Solo Quadcopter. (Spec’s Provided)

Purpose

With an exemption I’ll be conducting flights for aerial footage for commercial use. Footage collected will 

consist of open field sporting events. Practice, Camps, Combines, Games and Tournaments.

Safety

While conducting flights to collect footage we will have a two man team uniformed for the identity of 

the operator. The uniformed operator and second person will be wearing a safety hat and a bright 

colored shirt or jacket to be easily located. Quadcopter flights will hover no more than 250 feet above 

ground and stay within a 100 yard rectangle perimeter. Speed never to exceed 30 knots

While conducting flights to collect footage Quadcopter will stay in the line of sight at all times. Will not

be over stadium grandstands and or heavily populated areas. Quadcopter is installed with a ‘Return 

Home”, “Pause” and "Safety Net" Modes for easy flying.

Operator

Two person’s onsite with logged flight hours. 

Main operator to be William Treat

Secondary Operator Dallas Johnson

Maintenance

Prior to any flights for commercial use the UAS will be inspected for malfunctions, structural damage, 

and battery life by both operator s to ensure a safe operating condition.
3DR Solo Quadcopter Spec’s

General

Weight Unladen: 3.3 lb / 1.5 kg. With Solo Gimbal and GoPro: 4 lb

Performance

Maximum Speed 55 mph / 88.5 km/h

Maximum Altitude 400' / 121.9 m AGL

Flight Time Up to 25 minutes 

Flight Control System

Model Pixhawk 2

Software APM flight control software and GPS

Handheld Transmitter

Display Color Screen for menu and live flight telemetry

Battery Chemistry: Lithium-polymer Capacity: 5200 mAh . Voltage: 14.8 VDC Life: Up to 4 hours
Mobile App

System Requirements - Wi-Fi enabled iOS or Android mobile device

Wi-Fi Range Up to 2640' / 805 m (depending on environment)

FPV and Monitoring

Video Downlink Latency: 180 ms

Connectivity 1 x HDMI output on Transmitter

Components

Rotors 4 x 10 x 4.5" / 25.4 x 11.4 cm self-tightening props

Motors Velocity Constant: 880 kV

Gimbal Compatibility Solo Gimbal for HERO3+ and HERO4 GoPro Camera

Flight Battery

Model Solo Battery Voltage 14.8 VDC

Chemistry Lithium-polymer Capacity 5200 mAh

We will practice safe flights at all times and adhere to any and all conditions and limitations set forth by 

the FAA. I hope you’ll consider the request for an exemption. 

Sincerely, 

William Treat

Wtreat@OTHRecruiting.com

Off The Hook Recruiting, LLC
Exhibit 13.1


FERRARI


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Amedeo Felisa, Chief Executive Officer of Ferrari N.V. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, to which this statement is furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date: February 25, 2016/s/ Amedeo FelisaAmedeo FelisaChief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Ferrari N.V. and will be retained by Ferrari N.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for
      the
      period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A. Murdock, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




**/s/
                  THOMAS A.
                  MURDOCK**Thomas
                  A. MurdockChief
                  Executive Officer





Dated
      August 20, 2007
#### § 1.1382-5 Taxable income of cooperatives; products marketed under pooling arrangements.

For purposes of section 1382(b) and § 1.1382-2, in the case of a pooling arrangement for the marketing of products the patronage under such pool shall be treated as occurring during the taxable year in which the pool closes. The determination of when a pool is closed will be made on the basis of the facts and circumstances in each case, but generally the practices and operations of the cooperative organization shall control. This section may be illustrated by the following example:

# Example:

Farmer A delivers to the X Cooperative 100 bushels of wheat on August 15, 1963, at which time he receives a *per bushel* advance. (Both farmer A and the X Cooperative file returns on a calendar year basis.) On October 15, 1963 farmer A receives an additional *per bushel* payment. The pool sells some of its wheat in 1963 and the remainder in January of 1964. The pool is closed on February 15, 1964. For purposes of section 1382(b), A's patronage is considered as occurring in 1964.

[T.D. 6643, 28 FR 3156, Apr. 2, 1963]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7850 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to provide a waiver to the payment 

limitation under the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2024 

Ms. TOKUDA (for herself, Mr. MOYLAN, and Mr. CASE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to provide a 

waiver to the payment limitation under the Environmental Quality Incentives Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating Access 

5 Barriers to Conservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PAYMENTS. 

7 Section 1240G of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 

8 U.S.C. 3839aa–7) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7850 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘Not including payments made 

2 under’’ and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), not in4 cluding payments made under’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—In the case of a contract 

7 entered into under the program for projects in high-cost 

8 areas, including Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam, 

9 the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Vir10 gin Islands, the Secretary may waive the payment limita11 tion described in subsection (a).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB