alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Figure 3 - Travel Management Rule - Coconino National Forest
e Alternative 1 - No Action

fa) 012 3 4 5Miles
CE ee ae

© Towns

Coconino National Forest boundary

Interstate highways
=== U.S. or State highways

== County roads
Roads considered for motorized designation

Non-system (unauthorized) roads
— System (authorized) roads
Trails considered for motorized designation

Non-system (unauthorized) trails

System (authorized) trails

Non-Forest Service Lands

Wilderness

002334

o > om : 1 =X ; p. ,
al F Vv ie 5 5) 8 Ye x y y x4
y Re are j ty
oe a
2 aw" ~_.MUNDS PARK CA oy }
= %
a Ys a % 2 oe
Fy 202260 09421,
> 2 yy 4 _ Se, Oy we aN MORMON LAKES
& §, = ee, e & Nee % "05 ‘=f
&7 wtp” $ § . :
Ci $ $ £ 22465 Oo 3
ey é 901524 095868 he Cro! > 2
Fa Ey SEDONA & Ry
C BS oe 5 ge rd 2. 2%, |
7 ped a ~ 094706’ \ <7 %
Ne aK
gos % rq : B0pr2 ‘i g] by
5 & CZ sie . wii 3 WS
= C oe z (
“\007618 29645 % 0023 ai ats 2s
x = “00089 3 <F ‘ | 2
Ye
+ am € co
* Z > ¢ ge % Bh 1

ay 69.
& 17 iy : OF
ea i § 2 Fi ey f
y 00213 295.
COTTONWOOD Ri = \ 4 Rs ¥ z on A
. ‘\ yy 330 sg iz
S De 3 ao wort 09,
Yond ws oh % 90239, 29
or75 e/a Be 78 ‘Si $069, ie % 32s
. ‘CORNVILLE 7X oe oe 3 SS
Ste r , SCRE
$0, 76 ws Py eS oT wale asin i oozes? _2eM4s =
aN Fr a t rc, Es
Las ope ) off He 5
iN /! o06se HY or % =) dostec
2 y) ae 8
we ee f Yo,
Cn . i
% MequiREVILLE 77 Ke RIM ROCK 7. es ISS bo iH is - :
99247
;, | 6.
N x : Z f ; s/
as . 002148 \% at
2p, 9929 #
BR ee, Tet A es IS LE | Aeon
03E. oe
Tae = Sey Re * ‘ese
CAMP VERDE !
Lo = aaa |
ay 3 \$?—
a 0215 s iz : ee
foie 3 s i
a 4S

00814) S 2
woth AC

092354

Hex
& e

90154 Nw e coe
a

STRAWBERRY
ome

ky

PINE

wd Ye, ©

‘Thus product 1s reproduces trom geospatial mtormatn prepared by tne Cacarsno
Nationa’ Forest Geospatal intormation and GIS product accuracy may vary
Usng GIS products for purposes other than those far wnicn hey were created may
eld inaccurate of misleading resulta Coconma National Forest reserves the
right to correct. update, modify or replace GIS products without notification,

CartBoyerhelm ~ 26iune2009 - NAD 1S@3UTMZone 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
  FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 29, 1996 AND THE
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 29,
  1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
  STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-29-1996
<CASH>                                   66,496 
<SECURITIES>                              6,500
<RECEIVABLES>                            67,381
<ALLOWANCES>                              5,646
<INVENTORY>                              49,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        205,751
<PP&E>                                   96,698
<DEPRECIATION>                           53,346 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          261,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    60,036
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     22
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                              197,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            261,126
<SALES>                                  90,464 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         90,464
<CGS>                                    65,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            65,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          4,678
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           5,735
<INCOME-TAX>                              2,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       3,670 
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              3,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.16  
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014253EN.01005301.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/53

---

Action brought on 10 June 2014 — Gres La Sagra v Commission

(Case T-407/14)

2014/C 253/69

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gres La Sagra, SL (Alameda de la Sagra, Toledo, Spain) (represented by: A. López Gómez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera SA v Commission.

Duro Felguera SA

Commission

---
§ 1.180-1 Expenditures by farmers for fertilizer, etc. ( a ) *In general.* A taxpayer engaged in the business of farming may elect, for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1959, to treat as deductible expenses those expenditures otherwise chargeable to capital account which are paid or incurred by him during the taxable year for the purchase or acquisition of fertilizer, lime, ground limestone, marl, or other materials to enrich, neutralize, or condition land used in farming, and those expenditures otherwise chargeable to capital account paid or incurred for the application of such items and materials to such land. No election is required to be made for those expenditures which are not capital in nature. Section 180, § 1.180-2, and this section are not applicable to those expenses which are deductible under section 162 and the regulations thereunder or which are subject to the method described in section 175 and the regulations thereunder.
( b ) *Land used in farming.* For purposes of section 180(a) and of paragraph (a) of this section, the term *land used in farming* means land used (before or simultaneously with the expenditures described in such section and such paragraph) by the taxpayer or his tenant for the production of crops, fruits, or other agricultural products or for the sustenance of livestock. See section 180(b). Expenditures for the initial preparation of land never previously used for farming purposes by the taxpayer or his tenant (although chargeable to capital account) are not subject to the election. The principles stated in §§ 1.175-3 and 1.175-4 are equally applicable under this section in determining whether the taxpayer is engaged in the business of farming and whether the land is used in farming.
(74 Stat. 1001, 26 U.S.C. 180)
[T.D. 6548, 26 FR 1486, Feb. 22, 1961]
BOBBY JINDAL GOVERNOR PEGGY M. HATCH SECRETARY

## ~tate 

# of J'Louigiana DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

### ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 

### APR 7 2010 Mr. Charles Faultry Associate Director, Superfund Remedial Branch US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, IX 75202-2733 Re: Concurrence ofSite Deletion From the National Priorities List Ruston Foundry Superfund Site, AI 

### Number 12443 1010 Bogan Street, Alexandria, Rapides Parish, LA 

### DearMr. Faultry: The LouisianaDepartment ofEnvironmental QualitylRemediation Services Division (LDEQIRSD) is in receipt of the Site Deletion From the National Priorities Report dated 

### February 26, 2010. Thankyou for providingthis information. Based on the information provided, LDEQ/RSD concurs with the information found in aforementioned document. You may contact Wanda Ballou at (225) 219-3223 with any questions. Please continue to address any future correspondence with the 

### Al number to: 

### Thomas F. Harris, Administrator; Remediation 

### Services Division; P. O. Box 4314; 

### Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4314. Thank you foryour support and assistancein addressingthis site. Sincerely,

Thomas F. Harris, Administrator Remediation Services Division

c: Imaging Operations lAS

POSt Office Box 4313 • Bawn**Rc)ug~, J..o\li~i1l.na**  70821·4313 • Phont 225-21**~)·3181** • Fax 225-219-3309**W"\lI'JJ.ri(".(l.lt"'IIl1.~i~o~** ('T()v
Exhibit 10.4

AMENDMENT TO

SENIOR EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

WITH

TIMOTHY J. KORMAN

This Amendment to Senior Executive Employment Agreement is made as of this 17 day of July, 2007, by and between HILB ROGAL &
HOBBS COMPANY (the Company) and TIMOTHY J. KORMAN (the Executive).

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into
a Senior Executive Employment Agreement effective as of December 1, 2001, pursuant to which Company employs Executive as Executive Vice President  Finance and Administration of the Company (the Employment Agreement); and

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend certain provisions of Article III of the Employment Agreement relating to the
compensation of the Executive.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:



| | 1. | Paragraphs (C) and (D) of Article III of the Employment Agreement are hereby amended to provide as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (C) | Ancillary Benefits.
| | --- | -------------------

The Executive shall also be
entitled to vacations, participation in the Companys Profit Sharing Savings Plan (401K), Executive Voluntary Deferral Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Supplemental Cash Incentive Plan, sick leave benefits, post-retirement
benefit plan, and all other ancillary benefits provided by the Company, including, but not limited to, group life, health and disability insurance coverage, consistent with the compensation policies and practices of the Company from time to time
prevailing with respect to persons who are executive officers of the Company.



| | (D) | Stock Based Awards.
| | --- | -------------------

The Executive shall receive
such stock option, restricted stock and other equity-based compensation awards each year as determined by the Human Resources & Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its sole discretion.



| | 2. | All other provisions of the Employment Agreement are to remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WITNESS the following signatures as of the date first above written.



|          |  |                                                                       |  |                            |  |     |  |                                                 
|--------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|EXECUTIVE |  |                                                                       |  | HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY
|          |  |                                                                       |  |                           
|By:       |  | /s/  Timothy J. Korman                                                |  |                            |  | By: |  | /s/  A. Brent King                              
|          |  | Timothy J. Korman Executive Vice President 
Mergers and Acquisitions |  |                            |  |     |  | A. Brent King Vice President and General
Counsel
#### § 1.151-4 Amount of deduction for each exemption under section 151.

The amount allowed as a deduction for each exemption under section 151 is (a) $750 in the case of a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1972; (b) $700 in the case of a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1971, and before January 1, 1973; (c) $650 in the case of a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1970, and before January 1, 1972; (d) $625 in the case of a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1969, and before January 1, 1971; and (e) $600 in the case of a taxable year beginning before January 1, 1970. For special rules in the case of a fiscal year ending after December 31, 1969, and beginning before January 1, 1973, see section 21(d) and the regulations thereunder.

[T.D. 7114, 36 FR 9019, May 18, 1971]
1 This proceeding arises out of Caus e Nos. 2007-CR-3647 and 2008-CR-5359, styled The State of Texas v. Edler Gilstrap, in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, the Honorable Bert Richardson presiding. iii i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00527-CR IN RE Edler GILSTRAP Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 6, 2008 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On July 22, 2008, relator Edler Gilstrap file d a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his pro se Moti on for Speedy Trial or to dismiss with prejudice the underlying criminal case. We conclude trial counsel is also relator’s counsel for an original proceeding on the issue presented. Relato r is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The ab sence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id .; see also Gray v. Shipley , 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition is denied. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1802]



[[Page 5024]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements filed the week ending January 
17, 2009

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0007.
    Date Filed: January 14, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC31 North & Central Pacific. TC3 (except Japan)--North 
America, Caribbean. TC3-Central America, South America. Special 
Passenger Amending Resolution from Hong Kong (Memo 0471).
    Intended effective date: 15 January 2009.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0008.
    Date Filed: January 14, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC1 Areawide Resolution (Memo 0384).
    Intended effective date: 1 January 2009.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0009.
    Date Filed: January 14, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC1 Caribbean Resolution (Memo 0385).
    Intended effective date: 1 January 2009.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0011.
    Date Filed: January 14, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC1 Longhaul Between USA and Chile, Panama, Peru 
Resolution (Memo 0387).
    Intended effective date: 1 January 2009.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0012.
    Date Filed: January 14, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC1 Within South America Resolution (Memo 0388).
    Intended effective date: 1 January 2009.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0013.
    Date Filed: January 14, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC1 Longhaul Except Between USA and Chile, Panama, Peru 
Resolution (Memo 0386).
    Intended effective date: 1 January 2009.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0015.
    Date Filed: January 16, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC3 Within South East Asia, except between Malaysia and 
Guam, Resolutions & Specified Fares Tables (Memo 1257).
    Intended effective date: 1 April 2009.

Renee V. Wright
Program Manager, Docket Operations Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E9-1802 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
§ 884.5425 Scented or scented deodorized menstrual pad. ( a ) *Identification.* A scented or scented deodorized menstrual pad is a device that is a pad made of cellulosic or synthetic material which is used to absorb menstrual or other vaginal discharge. It has scent (i.e., fragrance materials) added for aesthetic purposes (scented menstrual pad) or for deodorizing purposes (scented deodorized menstrual pad). This generic type of device includes sterile scented menstrual pads used for medically indicated conditions, but does not include menstrual pads treated with added antimicrobial agents or other drugs.
( b ) *Classification.* ( 1 ) Class I (general controls) for menstrual pads made of common cellulosic and synthetic material with an established safety profile. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(1) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 884.9. This exemption does not include the intralabial pads and reusable menstrual pads.
( 2 ) Class II (special controls) for scented or scented deodorized menstrual pads made of materials not described in paragraph (b)(1). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
[45 FR 12684, Feb. 26, 1980, as amended at 45 FR 51185, Aug. 1, 1980; 61 FR 67714, Dec. 24, 1996; 66 FR 38809, July 25, 2001; 84 FR 71816, Dec. 30, 2019]
§ 884.2700 Intrauterine pressure monitor and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* An intrauterine pressure monitor is a device designed to detect and measure intrauterine and amniotic fluid pressure with a catheter placed transcervically into the uterine cavity. The device is used to monitor intensity, duration, and frequency of uterine contractions during labor. This generic type of device may include the following accessories: signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, and component parts.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
# C_2015155EN.01004002.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/40

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — Neue Halberg-Guss v Commission

(Case T-308/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 155/56)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8081 

To terminate United States Secret Service protection for felons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2024 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. CARTER of Louisiana, Ms. 

LEE of California, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. CLARKE of New York, 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. CROCKETT, Mrs. BEATTY, and Mr. 

COHEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To terminate United States Secret Service protection for 

felons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Denying Infinite Secu5 rity and Government Resources Allocated toward Con6 victed and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees 

7 Act’’ or the ‘‘DISGRACED Former Protectees Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8081 IH

1 SEC. 2. DENYING CERTAIN FELONS SECRET SERVICE PRO2 TECTION. 

3 Section 3056(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘declined.’’ and inserting ‘‘declined. 

5 The protection authorized in paragraphs (1) through (8) 

6 shall terminate for any person upon sentencing following 

7 conviction for a Federal or State offense that is punishable 

8 for a term of imprisonment of at least one year.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4840 Absorbable polydioxanone surgical suture. ( a ) *Identification.* An absorbable polydioxanone surgical suture is an absorbable, flexible, sterile, monofilament thread prepared from polyester polymer poly (p-dioxanone) and is intended for use in soft tissue approximation, including pediatric cardiovascular tissue where growth is expected to occur, and ophthalmic surgery. It may be coated or uncoated, undyed or dyed, and with or without a standard needle attached.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for the device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
[67 FR 77676, Dec. 19, 2002]