alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Chief Financial Officer of C&M Management Inc. and Director of Accounting of Boston Capital Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  | American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                  |                                                   
|                  | By:                                               
|                  |                                                   
|                  |                                                   
|                  | By:                                               
|                  |                                                   
|                  |                                                   
|                  | By:                                               
|                  |                                                   
|                  |                                                   
|Date:             |                                                   
|February 20, 2004 | By:                                               
|                  |                                                   
|                  |                                                   
|                  |
# C_2015138EN.01005201.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/52

---

Action brought on 23 December 2014 — Forbruger-Kontakt v Commission

(Case T-834/14)

(2015/C 138/69)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Forbruger-Kontakt A/S (Taastrup, Denmark) (represented by: M. Honoré, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the Commission’s decision of 9 July 2014 not to raise objections to tax exemptions for certain advertising materials (SA.35683); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the Commission’s decision of 9 July 2014 not to raise objections to tax exemptions for certain advertising materials (SA.35683);

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law put forward by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those put forward in case T-833/14 Søndagsavisen v Commission.

Søndagsavisen

Commission

---
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas A. Murdock, Chief
Executive Officer, and Roger D. Dudley, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                /s/ Thomas A. Murdock
                                ------------------------------------------
                                Thomas A. Murdock
                                Chief Executive Officer

                                /s/ Roger D. Dudley
                                ------------------------------------------
                                Roger D. Dudley
                                Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 145 (Thursday, July 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 38003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-18155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1302-000]


Northwest Wind Partners, LLC; Notice of Filing

July 23, 2009.
    Take notice that, on July 10, 2009, Northwest Wind Partners, LLC 
filed a replacement Attachment A to revise its June 16, 2009 
application for market-based rate authority filing in the above-
captioned docket with information required under the Commission's 
regulations. Such filing served to reset the filing date in this 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eea8abbcada1808287808bbd9b9e9e819c9aae888b9c8dc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8fefdeafbf7d6d4d1d6ddebcdc8c8d7caccf8deddcadb96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 31, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18155 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 1.1013-1 Property included in inventory.

The basis of property required to be included in inventory is the last inventory value of such property in the hands of the taxpayer. The requirements with respect to the valuation of an inventory are stated in subpart D (section 471 and following), part II, subchapter E, chapter 1 of the Code, and the regulations thereunder.
# C_2014142EN.01001701.xml

| 12.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 14 February 2014 — TUIfly GmbH v Harald Walter

(Case C-79/14)

2014/C 142/23

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TUIfly GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Harald Walter

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 7 of Regulation EC No 261/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council to be interpreted as meaning that a non-notified ‘early’ flight, with the result that the passengers cannot take the flight, is also covered by the regulation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 7 of Regulation EC No 261/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council to be interpreted as meaning that a non-notified ‘early’ flight, with the result that the passengers cannot take the flight, is also covered by the regulation?

1

| 2. | Is the regulation to be interpreted as meaning that, with the exception of Article 5, the cause of the delay is not decisive? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the regulation to be interpreted as meaning that, with the exception of Article 5, the cause of the delay is not decisive?

| 3. | Is the aim of the regulation, namely to compensate for the damage arising from a loss of time, also affected if the passenger would arrive earlier and therefore time arrangements before the flight are concerned? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the aim of the regulation, namely to compensate for the damage arising from a loss of time, also affected if the passenger would arrive earlier and therefore time arrangements before the flight are concerned?

| 4. | Does the lack of notification of the bringing forward of the flight, the consequence of which was that the holiday resort was reached later than planned, result in the regulation being applied? |
| --- | --- |

4.

Does the lack of notification of the bringing forward of the flight, the consequence of which was that the holiday resort was reached later than planned, result in the regulation being applied?

| 5. | Is the aim of the regulation to provide a high level of protection, with the result that the restriction of the passenger’s time arrangements is protected? Also in respect of an early arrival? |
| --- | --- |

5.

Is the aim of the regulation to provide a high level of protection, with the result that the restriction of the passenger’s time arrangements is protected? Also in respect of an early arrival?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3660 Impression material. ( a ) *Identification.* Impression material is a device composed of materials such as alginate or polysulfide intended to be placed on a preformed impression tray and used to reproduce the structure of a patient's teeth and gums. The device is intended to provide models for study and for production of restorative prosthetic devices, such as gold inlays and dentures.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (Special Controls).
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 68 FR 19738, Apr. 22, 2003]
Order entered July 11, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00651 - CV HI SOON AND YOUNG SHIN PARK, Appellant s V. WELLS FARGO BANK, AS TRUST/TRUSTEE OF ABFC 2004 - OPT2 TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judic ial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 12 - 02647



### O RDER The clerk’s record is two months overdue in this appeal. Appellants’ docketing statement reflect s that appellants have both requested the clerk’s record and made payment arr angements for the record. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, either the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant s ha ve not paid for the record. We notify app ellants that if we receive verification of

non - payment, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 37.3(b).We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary

Fitzsim mons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Civil Records Division, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 26, 2015, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2015-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets
and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2017By:

/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 30, 2017
Exhibit 99

              Marine Products Corporation Reports Stock Buyback

    ATLANTA, July 10 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Marine Products Corporation
(Amex: MPX) today reported that during its fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003
it had purchased for cash on the open market, and retired, a total of 95,000
shares of its $0.10 par value common stock.  The stock buyback program
authorizes the repurchase of up to one million shares.
    Marine Products Corporation (Amex: MPX) designs, manufactures and
distributes premium-branded Chaparral sterndrive pleasure boats and Robalo
outboard offshore fishing boats, and continues to diversify its product line
through product innovation and strategic acquisition.  With premium brands and
a solid capital structure, Marine Products Corporation is prepared to
capitalize on opportunities to increase its market share and to generate
superior financial performance to build long-term shareholder value.  For more
information on Marine Products Corporation visit www.marineproductscorp.com .

    For information contact:
    BEN M. PALMER                              JIM LANDERS
    Chief Financial Officer                    Corporate Finance
    404.321.7910                               404.321.2162
    irdept@marineproductscorp.com
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10813-10814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLORV00000.L10200000.DD0000; HAG 10-0172]


Notice of Public Meeting, Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, the U.S. Department of the Interior, 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory 
Council (SEORAC) will meet as indicated below:

DATES: The SEORAC meeting will begin 8 a.m. PDT on April 14, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The SEORAC will meet at the Burns District Office Conference 
Room, 28910 Highway 20 West, Hines, Oregon 97738.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Wilkening, 100 Oregon Street, 
Vale, Oregon 97918, (541) 473-6218 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5d8d4c7deeac2dcd9ded0dbdcdbd2f5d7d9d89bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90fdf1e2fbcfe7f9fcfbf5fef9fef7d0f2fcfdbef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meeting will take place on 
April 14, 2010 at the Burns District Office Conference Room, 28910 
Highway 20 West, Hines, Oregon, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting may 
include such topics as Election of Officers, 2010 SEORAC Work Plan, BLM 
Energy Project Team Status Report, Updates on Lakeview and Southeast 
Oregon Resource Management Plans, BLM Vegetation EIS update, litigation 
updates, update on the BLM sagebrush/sage-grouse teams, Phase II Blue 
Mountain Forest Plan, Fremont-Winema Travel Management, and other 
matters as may reasonably come before the council. The public is 
welcome to attend all portions of the meeting and may make oral 
comments to the Council at 1 p.m. on April 14, 2010. Those who verbally 
address the SEORAC are asked to provide a written statement of their 
comments or presentation. Unless otherwise approved by the SEORAC 
Chair, the public comment period will last no longer than 15 minutes, 
and each speaker may address the SEORAC for a maximum of five minutes. 
If reasonable accommodation is required, please

[[Page 10814]]

contact the BLM Vale District Office at (541) 473-6213 as soon as 
possible.

    Dated: March 1, 2010.
Donald N. Gonzalez,
Vale District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2010-4927 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0423

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

JACINTA HARRIS,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

CHRISTOPHER HARRIS,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Brenda Gilbert, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 21 2023

06/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0423
§ 1.382-11 Reporting requirements. ( a ) *Information statement required.* A loss corporation must include a statement entitled, “STATEMENT PURSUANT TO § 1.382-11(a) BY [INSERT NAME AND EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF TAXPAYER], A LOSS CORPORATION,” on or with its income tax return for each taxable year that it is a loss corporation in which an owner shift, equity structure shift or other transaction described in § 1.382-2T(a)(2)(i) occurs. The statement must include the date(s) of any owner shifts, equity structure shifts, or other transactions described in § 1.382-2T(a)(2)(i), the date(s) on which any ownership change(s) occurred, and the amount of any attributes described in § 1.382-2(a)(1)(i) that caused the corporation to be a loss corporation. A loss corporation may also be required to include certain elections on this statement, including— ( 1 ) An election made under § 1.382-2T(h)(4)(vi)(B) to disregard the deemed exercise of an option if the actual exercise of that option occurred within 120 days of the ownership change; and
( 2 ) An election made under § 1.382-6(b)(2) to close the books of the loss corporation for purposes of allocating income and loss to periods before and after the change date for purposes of section 382.
( b ) *Effective/applicability date.* This section applies to any taxable year beginning on or after May 30, 2006. However, taxpayers may apply this section to any original Federal income tax return (including any amended return filed on or before the due date (including extensions) of such original return) timely filed on or after May 30, 2006. For taxable years beginning before May 30, 2006, see § 1.382-2T as contained in 26 CFR part 1 in effect on April 1, 2006.
[T.D. 9329, 72 FR 32803, June 14, 2007]
SNCR Page 1of3 PIPELINE California Portland Installation 

## NOW, YOUR LONG CEMENT 

## KILN CAN TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE OF SNCR'S NOX REDUCING POWER. http://www.cadencerecycling.comfsncr.html 3/6/2012SNCR Page 2 of3 t ...

3/6/2012 http://www.cadencerecycling.com/sncr.html
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3750 Bracket adhesive resin and tooth conditioner. ( a ) *Identification.* A bracket adhesive resin and tooth conditioner is a device composed of an adhesive compound, such as polymethylmethacrylate, intended to cement an orthodontic bracket to a tooth surface.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.