## Completeness Determination Completed

### by: TimRuss,AirProgram,USEPA,Region

### 8 Date: 

### May30,2014

40 CFR 51 APPENDIX V CRITERIA

2.1 Administrative Materials

(a) A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof (hereafter "the plan").

(b) Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement (hereafter "document") in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. (c) Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan.

(d) A copy of the actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporationby reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, datedby the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself

. 

### SUBMITTAL ITEM
Utah State Implementation PlanApproval Request; R307- 110-36, Vehicle Inspection andMaintenance Program, Part F, Cache County and an amendment to the Utah SIP, SectionX, Vehicle Inspection andMaintenance Program, Part F, Cache County, as adoptedby the UAQB on November 6, 2013.
Submittal letter dated January 28, 2014 from GaryR. Herbert, Governor of Utah and Administrative Documents as submittedby a letter dated February4, 2014 by Bryce Bird, Director, Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ), Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ).
The UAQB adopted the revisions to R307-110-36, Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program, Part F, Cache County and an amendment to the Utah SIP, SectionX, Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program, Part F, Cache County, onNovember 6, 2013. The revisions became State effective onNovember 7, 2013.

The State's legal authority is providedunder the tab

"CODES" of the Administrative Documents submittal. The CODES tab provides copies of "Title 19 Environmental Quality Code, Chapter 2, Air ConservationAct" and "R15, Administrative Services, Administrative Rules."
The State's submittal contained the following documents: A.) 7/29/13 version of the proposed revisions (strikeout and new language shown) of the R307-110-36, Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program, Part F, Cache County and an amendment to the Utah SIP, Section X, Vehicle Inspection andMaintenance Program, Part F, Cache County

. Effective date does not appear directly in the final version of the document itself, but the Stateprovided documentation that the final version of the revisions became State effective onNovember 7, 2013.

### 40 CFR 51 APPENDIX V CRITERIA (e) Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. (f) Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent withprocedures approvedby EPA, including the date of publication of suchnotice. (g) Certification that public hearings(s) were held in accordance with the informationprovided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable.

(h) Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto.

2.2 Technical Support

(a) Identification of all regulated pollutants affectedby the plan.

(b) Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected areas(s). 

### SUBMITTAL ITEM
The "Certification Page" document is signed byMarkW. Berger, Rules Coordinator for the Utah Division of Air Quality, that all necessary State procedures were followed. The certificationpage is signed as of January 31, 2014. Evidence was provided, in the Administrative Documents, of the Public Notice as was provided in Utah State Bulletindated September 1, 2013.

The Administrative Documents state that onAugust 7, 2013, the UAQB proposed for public comment the revisions to R307-110-36, Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program, Part F, Cache County and an amendment to the Utah SIP, SectionX, Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program, Part F, Cache County. The Administrative Documents state that a public comment period was held from September 1 to October 1, 2013 and that no comments and that a public hearing was not requested.
The Administrative Documents state that a public comment period was held from September 1 to October 1, 2013 and that no comments and that a public hearing was not requested.
Note: There was no Technical Support Document (TSD) associated with this State rulemaking action.

In SIP SectionX, Part F, Cache County Inspection and Maintenance, Cache County Emission Inspection 

### I Maintenance Program, Ordinance 2013-04, Bear River Health Department Regulation No. 2013-1, Appendix, CarbonMonoxide and Hydrocarbons cutpoints are identified.
Locations of sources (vehicles) affected by SIP Section X, Part F, Cache County Inspection and Maintenance, Cache County Emission Inspection 

### I Maintenance Program, Ordinance 2013-04, Bear River Health Department RegulationNo. 2013-1,are typically those vehicles registered in Cache County, Utah. Aportion of Cache County was designated as nonattainment for the 2006 24- hour PM2

.s NAAQS on November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688)

. For the nonattainment area boundary, see Logan UT-ID CBSA, Cache, UT (partial); Franklin, ID (partial). A nonattainment area SIP revision, for the Cache County area (LoganUT

- ID PM2

.s nonattainment area) has not been approvedby EPA as of May 30, 2014.

### 40 CFR 51 APPENDIX V CRITERIA (c) Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emission from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emission from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certainbaseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. (d) The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented

.

(e) Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, justificationof model selections, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. (f) Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology

. (g) Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, workpractice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels.

(h) Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined inpractice. 

### SUBMITTAL ITEM
The Governor's January 28, 2014 SIP revision submittal and the February 4, 2014 Administrative Documents submittal did not specifically identify anticipated emission reductions from the Cache County Inspection 

### I Maintenance Program. However, a prior SIP revision for the Cache County PM2.5 attainment demonstration, dated December, 2012 and December, 2013 indicated in Section 6.6 Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM/RACT)that the Cache County Inspection 

### I Maintenance Programwould achieve anticipated emissions reductions for the year 2014 of 0.24 tons per day for NOx and 0.22 tons per day for VOC.
As indicated in a prior SIP revision for the Cache County PM2.5 attainment demonstration, dated December, 2012 and December 2013, Section 6.6 Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM/RACT), as supported by the analysis conducted by UDAQ, a motor vehicle emission inspection and maintenance (I/M) program is a necessary control strategy for Cache County to attain the PM2.sNAAQS as expeditiously as practicable.
Aprior SIP revision for the Cache County PM2.5 attainment demonstration, dated December, 2012 and December, 2013 indicated in Section 6.6 Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM/RACT)that the Cache County Inspection 

### I Maintenance Programwould achieve anticipated emissions reductions for the year 2014 of 0.24 tons per day for NOx and 0.22 tons per day for VOC

. This estimate used EPA's MOVES2010bm obile source emissions model.

Not Applicable.

The submitted Bear River Health Department's Regulation No. 2013-1, for implementing the Cache County inspection and maintenance program, contains requirements for permitting I/M stations, training and certification of I/M inspectors, inspection procedures, specifications for testing equipm ent, quality assurance requirements. Disciplinarypenalties and appeals processes. The submitted Bear River Health Department's Regulation No. 2013-1, for implementing the Cache County inspection and maintenance program, contains requirements for disciplinarypenalties and appeals processes.

### 40 CFR 51 APPENDIXV CRITERIA (i) Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. 

### SUBMITTAL ITEM
Not Applicable.