FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEV EN T HC IRC U IT SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 10690 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 4 - 8 0 1 1 4 - C R - D MM U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s B E N J A M I N H . M C C A L L U M , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( S e p t e m b e r 30, 2005) B efo re T JO F L A T , D U B IN A an d C A RN E S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: B e nj a m i n H . M c C a l l um w a s s e nt e nc e d t o 51 m onths i m pr i s onm e ntf orba nk2

r o b b e ry a n d a tt e m p t e d b a n k r o b b e ry , b o th i n v i o l a t i o n o f 1 8 U. S . C . § 2 1 1 3 ( a ) . On appeal , M cC al l um cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourtcom m i tt ed cl ea r e rr or un der U n ite d S ta te s v . B o o k e r , 5 4 3 U .S . , 1 2 5 S . C t. 7 3 8 ( 2 0 0 5 ) , b y s e n te n c in g h im u n d er th e m an d at o ry sch em e o f th e sen t en ci n g g u i d el i n es. N otw i ths t a ndi ng hi s a s s e r t i ons t o the c ontr a ry , M c C a l l um f a i l e d t o pr e s e r ve hi s B oo ker c l ai m for app ea l . T he re cord i nd i ca t es thatthe di stri ctcourtsol i ci t ed obj e c t i ons t o the s e nt e nc e i m pos e d a nd tha tM c C a l l um s t a t e d tha the di d notha ve any obj ec t i on s. F urtherm ore, du ri ng the pl eahear i ng , the courtre cogn i ze d there w a s “ a l otof

unc e r t a i nty ” c onc e rni ng the c ons t i tut i ona l i ty of the s e nt e nc i ng g u id e lin e s . T h e c o u r t a s k e d M c C a llu m w h e th e rh is a tto rn e y h a d tr ie d to e x p la in th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s to h im a n d M c C a llu m r e p lie d th a t h e h a d . D e s p ite v ir tu a lly be i ng pr om pt e d, M c C a l l um di d notobj e c tt o the c ons t i tut i ona l i ty of hi s gui de l i ne s e n te n c e . I n s te a d , s e v e n d a y s la te rh e f ile d a F e d . R . C r im . P . 3 5 ( a ) m o tio n to corr ec tse nt ence . M cC al l um no w cont ends thathi s R ul e 35(a) m ot i on pres erved the error f

or appeal and thathe i s e nt i t l ed t o re- se nt enci ng . R ul e 35(a) m ot i on s a re r e s e rv e d f

o r“ a r i th me t i c a l , t e c h n i c a l , o ro th e rc l e a re rr o r . ” Se e Fe d . R. Cr i m. P. 3 5 (a ). S in ce B o o k erer ro r d o es n o t fall i n to an y o f th es e c ateg o ries , M cC allu m ’s c l a i m w a s notpr e s e rve d. M c C a l l um doe s notc ont e nd tha the i s e nt i t l e d t o r e - s e nt e nc i ng unde rthe3

p la in e rr o rs ta n d a r d th a t a c tu a lly ap p lie s to c a s e s o f u n p r e s e rv e d e rr o r , s u c h a s th is o n e , s e e U n ite d S ta te s v . R o d r ig u e z , 3 9 8 F .3 d 1 2 9 1 , 1 2 9 8 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) , c e r t. d e n ie d , 1 2 5 S . C t. 2 9 3 5 ( 2 0 0 5 ) , a n d w e c a n u n d e r s ta n d th e ab s e n c e o f th is a r gum e nt . M c C a l l um c a nnotm e e tthe thi r d pr ong of the pl a i n e rr ors t a nda r d, because he c anno tshow a r ea sonabl e probabi l i ty of adi ff er entre sul ti f he had been s e n te n c e d u n d e ra n a d v is o ry r e g im e . S e e id . a t 1 2 9 9 - 1 3 0 0 . I n a n y e v e n t, M cC al l um do es no tar gu e that . F or these re as on s, w e a ff i rm hi s s ent ence . AF F I RME D.