alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3309 Herpes virus nucleic acid-based cutaneous and mucocutaneous lesion panel. ( a ) *Identification.* A herpes virus nucleic acid-based cutaneous and mucocutaneous lesion panel is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic device intended for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of different herpes viruses in cutaneous and mucocutaneous lesion samples from symptomatic patients suspected of Herpetic infections. Negative results do not preclude infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. The assay is not intended for use in cerebrospinal fluid samples.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation for the device description, including the device components, ancillary reagents required but not provided, and a detailed explanation of the methodology including primer design and selection.
( 2 ) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation from the following analytical and clinical performance studies: Analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection), reactivity, inclusivity, precision, reproducibility, interference, cross reactivity, carry-over, and cross contamination.
( 3 ) Premarket notification submissions must include detailed documentation of a clinical study using lesion samples in which Herpes Simplex Virus 1, Herpes Simplex Virus 2, or Varicella Zoster Virus DNA detection was requested. The study must compare the device performance to an appropriate well established reference method.
( 4 ) A detailed explanation of the interpretation of results and acceptance criteria must be included in the device's 21 CFR 809.10(b)(9) compliant labeling.
( 5 ) The device labeling must include a limitation statement that reads: “The device is not intended for use with cerebrospinal fluid or to aid in the diagnosis of HSV or VZV infections of the central nervous system (CNS).”
( 6 ) Premarket notification submissions must include quality assurance protocols and a detailed documentation for device software, including, but not limited to, standalone software applications and hardware-based devices that incorporate software.
( 7 ) The risk management activities performed as part of the manufacturer's 21 CFR 820.30 design controls must document an appropriate end user device training program that will be offered as part of efforts to mitigate the risk of failure to correctly operate the instrument.
[83 FR 52314, Oct. 17, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.5730 Moist heat pack. ( a ) *Identification.* A moist heat pack is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of silica gel in a fabric container used to retain an elevated temperature and that provides moist heat therapy for body surfaces.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, regarding general requirements concerning records and § 820.198, regarding complaint files.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 38818, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1700 Pupillometer. ( a ) *Identification.* A pupillometer is an AC-powered or manual device intended to measure by reflected light the width or diameter of the pupil of the eye.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The AC-powered device and the manual device are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9. The manual device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[55 FR 48442, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 63013, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38812, July 25, 2001]
39279.

#### CURL v. CHERRY.

Decided January 25, 1962.

*B. M. Daley, Jones ■& Douglas, Paul J. Jones, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thompson & Briley, Joseph H. Briley, H. Dale Thompson,*contra.

Eberhardt, Judge.

This companion case of *Curl v. Cherry,*ante, seeks recovery of medical expenses for injuries to the plaintiff’s minor child. The substantive allegations being the same, the ruling is controlled by *Curl v. Cherry,*ante, and the defendant’s general demurrer should have been sustained.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Carlisle, P. J., and Custer, J., concur.*
p. 1 of 1 

From: Hulse, David G. [mailto:David.Hulse@alcoa.com] 

Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 6:12 PM 

To: Putney, David 

Cc: Palazzolo, Michael A. 

Subject: FW: Revised Files for Alcoa Inc. - Wenatchee Works 

Here are the files that I submitted previously. I did 

notice that the stack diameters for the roof vents are 

meaningless, since those don't have a "diameter". My 

understanding was that there is a different method employed 

in modeling those sources, and that a diameter was not 

needed. If you need dimensions (Length and width of the 

roof opening), please let me know, and I will get them to 

you. Other than that, everything looks correct. 

Dave 

____________________________________________ 

From: Hulse, David G. 

Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:53 PM 

To: Boyd.Rochelle@EPA.gov

Subject: Revised Files for Alcoa Inc. - Wenatchee Works 

Attached, please find the revised kmz, ReleasePoint, and 

CategoryHAPs files for the Alcoa Inc. - Wenatchee Works 

facility (NEI42328). 

The kmz file includes both the emission points and the 

property boundary. 

We used the fugitive (area) source approach to represent 

the Potline Roof Vents and the Anode Bake Oven Roof Vents. 

Where we believe that the point should be deleted, the cell 

is shaded red. The cells not shaded in red matched MACT 

emissions sources and the coordinates were confirmed. 

Please contact me if you have any questions. 

David Hulse
§ 1.1071-1 Gain from sale or exchange to effectuate policies of Federal Communications Commission. ( a ) ( 1 ) At the election of the taxpayer, section 1071 postpones the recognition of the gain upon the sale or exchange of property if the Federal Communications Commission grants the taxpayer a certificate with respect to the ownership and control of radio broadcasting stations which is in accordance with subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. Any taxpayer desiring to obtain the benefits of section 1071 shall file such certificate with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, or the district director for the internal revenue district in which the income tax return of the taxpayer is required to be filed.
( 2 ) ( i ) In the case of a sale or exchange before January 1, 1958, the certificate from the Federal Communications Commission must clearly identify the property and show that the sale or exchange is necessary or appropriate to effectuate the policies of such Commission with respect to the ownership and control of radio broadcasting stations.
( ii ) In the case of a sale or exchange after December 31, 1957, the certificate from the Federal Communications Commission must clearly identify the property and show that the sale or exchange is necessary or appropriate to effectuate a change in a policy of, or the adoption of a new policy by, such Commission with respect to the ownership and control of radio broadcasting stations.
( 3 ) The certificate shall be accompanied by a detailed statement showing the kind of property, the date of acquisition, the cost or other basis of the property, the date of sale or exchange, the name and address of the transferee, and the amount of money and the fair market value of the property other than money received upon such sale or exchange.
( b ) Section 1071 applies only in the case of a sale or exchange made necessary by reason of the Federal Communications Commission's policies as to ownership or control of radio facilities. Section 1071 does not apply in the case of a sale or exchange made necessary as a result of other matters, such as the operation of a broadcasting station in a manner determined by the Commission to be not in the public interest or in violation of Federal or State law.
( c ) An election to have the benefits of section 1071 shall be made in the manner prescribed in § 1.1071-4.
( d ) For purposes of section 1071, the term *radio broadcasting* includes telecasting.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-0531

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM142AD

190-54-A015 --- 6/23/14

190-54-A015, R01 --- 6/26/14

190-54-A015, R02 --- 6/27/14

190LIN-54-A006 --- 6/23/14

190LIN-54-A006, R01 --- 6/26/14

190LIN-54-0006-IN01 --- 7/7/14

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### § 1.1374-9 Anti-stuffing rule.

If a corporation acquires an asset before or during the recognition period with a principal purpose of avoiding the tax imposed under section 1374, the asset and any loss, deduction, loss carryforward, credit, or credit carryforward attributable to the asset is disregarded in determining the S corporation's pre-limitation amount, taxable income limitation, net unrealized built-in gain limitation, deductions against net recognized built-in gain, and credits against the section 1374 tax.

[T.D. 8579, 59 FR 66470, Dec. 27, 1994]
(logo) Rialto

CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

** **

** **

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of May 1,2015 by and among Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp. as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as OperatingAdvisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administratorand Wilmington Trust, National Association as Trustee relating to the CreditSuisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSAIL 2015-C2 CommercialMortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C2 **(CSAIL2015-C2)**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorizedofficer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the "SpecialServicer") herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       All servicing activities and performanceof such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement areperformed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       A review of the servicing activities andperformance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 toDecember 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance with thePooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.       To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theterms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for theReporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and statusthereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, ManagingDirector 

 

Date: March 1, 2019
§ 822.25 What are my responsibilities after my postmarket surveillance plan has been approved? After we have approved your plan, you must conduct the postmarket surveillance of your device in accordance with your approved plan. This means that you must ensure that: ( a ) Postmarket surveillance is initiated in a timely manner;
( b ) The surveillance is conducted with due diligence;
( c ) The data identified in the plan is collected;
( d ) Any reports required as part of your approved plan are submitted to us in a timely manner; and
( e ) Any information that we request prior to your submission of a report or in response to our review of a report is provided in a timely manner.
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post Effective Amendment No. 10 to
Registration Statement No. 33-86330 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance
Company Separate Account Six of our report dated March 26, 2003, relating to
the financial statements of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company, and
of our report dated February 21, 2003, relating to the financial statements of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate Account Six, appearing in
the Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public
Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
#### ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY COMM’N *v.*Ralph D. MONTGOMERY et ux

5-5219

454 S. W. 2d 87

Opinion delivered May 25, 1970

*Thomas Keys*and *Virginia Tackett,*for appellant.

*James Pilkinton,*for appellees.

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The sole issue in this eminent domain *action is*whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing appellant Arkansas State Highway Commission a continuance when it discovered during trial that the landowners, appellees Ralph D. *831and Marie Montgomery, had by interlineation amended their answer to claim $14,000 instead of $8,000 as just compensation.

The record shows that the landowners owned lands in Blocks 1, 3 and 5 of McDowell’s Subdivision, that the blocks were separated by platted but unopened streets, and that the landowners had their ownership in the three blocks under one fence without regard to the platted streets.

The taking here touched only Block 1 of McDowell’s Subdivision. When the landowners first answered, they claimed damages of $8,000, but when the appraisers viewed the property and notified counsel for landowners that the property in the three blocks constituted a unit and that all three were damaged, counsel for landowners by interlineation on the original answer, and without service of notice on the Highway Department, changed the $8,000 to $14,000.

The matter of the claimed damages to the three blocks as a unit was discussed with the court at a pretrial conference. The trial judge decided that he was unable to rule on the issue until all of the landowners’ proof was heard. As a result the testimony on behalf of the landowners was presented both on damages to the three blocks as a unit and on damages to the Block 1 land, in case the court ultimately ruled that the evidence as to the unit was insufficient to go to the jury.

While witnesses were testifying to damages sustained to the three blocks as a unit, the Highway Department moved for a continuance because the landowners had only claimed in their answer damages of $8,000 and that they were now testifying to damages in a greater amount to the surprise of the Department. At the conclusion of the landowners’ proof, the trial court sustained the Highway Department’s objection to the damage testimony based upon the three blocks as a unit. This left the testimony on damages to Block 1 *832at $8,475 by Mr. Charles Wilburn and $10,275 by Mr. P. M. Brown.

A continuance is usually a matter of discretion with the trial court and a party has no reason to complain of a refusal of a continuance in the absence of a showing of surprise. We find no abuse of discretion in this instance since the issues presented to the jury were confined to the Highway Department’s theory of the damages sustained.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on February 3, 2010 at the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Headquarters office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. During this meeting information will be shared about Holden Mine clean-up operations, Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, and Bureau of Land Management Resource Management Plan update. All Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Becki Heath, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, phone 509-664-9200.

                            Dated:                             *January 6, 2010.*

Rebecca Lockett Heath,

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2010-513 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
United States Environmental Protection Agency Electronic Docket Index for [EPA - R09 - OAR - 201 6 - 0726 ] Approval and Limited Approval and Limited Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; California; Mendocino County Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits I. SIP Submittal Documents I - A SIP submittal letter from CARB, dated November 1 5 , 201 6 I - B Rule 1 - 130

– Definitions , clean copy I - C Rule 1 - 20 0

– Permit Requirements , clean copy I - D Rule 1 - 2 20

– New Source Review Standards , clean copy I - E Rule 1 - 230

– Action on Applications, clean copy I - F Rule 1 - 130

– Definitions, strike out copy I - G Rule 1 - 200

– Permit Requirements, strike out copy I - H Rule 1 - 220

– New Source Review Standards , strike out copy I - I Rule 1 - 230

– Action on Applications, strike out copy II. Federal Register Notice s 1 II - A 50 FR 30942 , July 31, 1989 ( Rules 1 - 220 and 1 - 230) II - B 54 FR 14650 , April 12, 1989 (Rule 1 - 200) II - C 57 FR 13498 , April 16, 1992 ( Title I General Preamble ) II - D 73 FR 28321, May 16, 2008 ( NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule ) II - E 75 FR 64864, October 20, 2010 ( PM2.5 PSD Increments

– SILS - SMC Rule ) II - F 76 FR 26192, May 6, 2011 (Rule 1 - 130) II - G 78 FR 73698 , December 9, 2013 II - H 80 FR 50199 August 19, 2015 (Subject to regulation vacatur ) II - I 81 FR 18766, April 1, 2016 II - J 81 FR 58010, August 24, 2016 III. Other Relevant Documents III - A Submittal Completeness Letter, November 15, 2016 III - B EPA’s Technical Support Document for MCAQMD Rules 1 - 130 , 1 - 200, 1 - 220, & 1 - 2 30 , December 6, 2016 II I - C Rule 1 - 130

– Definitions , clean copy III - D Rule 1 - 20 0

– Permit Requirements , clean copy III - E Rule 1 - 2 20

– New Source Review Standards, clean copy III - F Rule 1 - 230

– Action on Applications, clean copy 1 All Federal Register notices listed after 1993 are available on - line at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FRI V. EPA Rulemaking Documents IV - A Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking dated December 27, 2016 ( 81 FR 95074 )
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1265 Estriol test system. ( a ) *Identification.* An estriol test system is a device intended to measure estriol, an estrogenic steroid, in plasma, serum, and urine of pregnant females. Estriol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of fetoplacental distress in certain cases of high-risk pregnancy.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2306, Jan. 14, 2000]
§ 74.1260 D&C Orange No. 10. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive D&C Orange No. 10 is a mixture consisting principally of 4′,5′-diiodofluorescein, 2′,4′,5′-triiodofluorescein, and 2′,4′,5′,7′-tetraiodofluorescein.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with D&C Orange No. 10 may contain only those diluents listed in this subpart as safe and suitable for use in color additive mixtures for coloring externally applied drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* D&C Orange No. 10 shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice: Sum of volatile matter (at 135 °C) and halides and sulfates (calculated as sodium salts), not more than 8 percent. Insoluble matter (alkaline solution), not more than 0.5 percent. Phthalic acid, not more than 0.5 percent. 2-[3′,5′-Diiodo-2′,4′-dihydroxybenzoyl] benzoic acid, not more than 0.5 percent. Fluorescein, not more than 1 percent. 4′-Iodofluorescein, not more than 3 percent. 2′,4′-Diiodofluorescein and 2′,5′-diiodofluorescein, not more than 2 percent. 2′,4′,5′-Triiodofluorescein, not more than 35 percent. 2′,4′,5′,7′-Tetraiodofluorescein, not more than 10 percent. 4′,5′-Diiodofluorescein, not less than 60 percent and not more than 95 percent. Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million. Total color, not less than 92 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* D&C Orange No. 10 may be safely used for coloring externally applied drugs in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice.
( d ) *Labeling requirements.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Certification.* All batches of D&C Orange No. 10 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
[46 FR 18953, Mar. 27, 1981]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4772]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

Cancellation

Date and Time: Thursday, March 4, 2010, at 2 p.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

Status: This hearing has been cancelled.

Audit Hearing: The Jefferson Committee.
* * * * *
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Darlene Harris, Acting Commission Secretary, at (202) 
694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

Person to Contact for Information: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

    Signed: Darlene Harris,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-4772 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M