Memo to EPA Employees | Administrator Lisa Jackson | US EPA

http://www.epa.gov/Administrator/operationsmemo.html#g[3/22/2012 11:40:23 AM]

You are here: EPA Home Administrator Lisa Jackson Memo to EPA Employees

Administrator Lisa Jackson

Contact Us Search: All EPA This Area

Memo to EPA Employees

DATE: April 23, 2009

SUBJECT: Transparency in EPA’s Operations

FROM: Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator

TO: All EPA Employees

General Principles

Appointment Calendars

Freedom of Information Act Policy

Rulemaking Proceedings

Litigation and Formal Adjudication

Contacts with Congress and the Press

Communications Generally

Conclusion

In my testimony before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works and in my

January 23, 2009, memorandum to all employees, I expressed my commitment to uphold the

values of transparency and openness in conducting EPA operations. President Obama recently said

in a memorandum to agency heads: “Transparency promotes accountability and provides

information for citizens about what their Government is doing. Information maintained by the

Federal Government is a national asset.” I am asking each one of you to help me ensure EPA

operates in full compliance with this principle.

The success of our environmental efforts depends on earning and maintaining the trust of the

public we serve. The American people will not trust us to protect their health or their environment

if they do not trust us to be transparent and inclusive in our decision-making. To earn this trust, we

must conduct business with the public openly and fairly.

In 1983, then-Administrator William Ruckelshaus promised that under his leadership, EPA would

operate “in a fishbowl.” I wish to reaffirm this commitment and take the opportunity to provide

guidelines about how we will ensure transparency in our interactions with all members of the public.

These guidelines are intended to maintain the fairness and openness of our operations and thus

strengthen public confidence in our decisions. I am relying on EPA employees to use their good

judgment to conduct themselves with the openness and integrity that alone can guarantee public

trust in EPA.

General Principles

In all its programs, EPA will provide for the fullest possible public participation in decision-making.

This requires not only that EPA remain open and accessible to those representing all points of

view, but also that EPA offices responsible for decisions take affirmative steps to solicit the views of

those who will be affected by these decisions. This includes communities of color, Native

Americans, people disproportionately impacted by pollution, small businesses, cities and towns

working to meet their environmental responsibilities, and others who have been historically

underrepresented in EPA decision-making. EPA will not accord privileged status to any special

interest, nor will it accept any recommendation or proposal without careful, critical, and

independent examination.

Appointment Calendars

To keep the public fully informed of my contacts with interested persons, I have directed that a

Administrator

Home

Biography

Administrator's

Schedule

Acting Deputy

Administrator's

Schedule

Memos:

Opening Memo to

Employees

Transparency in

EPA’s Operations

Scientific

Integrity

Video/Audio Gallery

Related Links

Share
Memo to EPA Employees | Administrator Lisa Jackson | US EPA

http://www.epa.gov/Administrator/operationsmemo.html#g[3/22/2012 11:40:23 AM]

working copy of my appointment calendar, showing meetings with members of the public, be

provided to the EPA Office of Public Affairs, where it will be available to the public each day on the

EPA Web site. I also direct other senior Agency officials, including the Deputy Administrator, the

Assistant Administrators, and the Regional Administrators, to make their working appointment

calendars available to the public in a similar fashion.

Freedom of Information Act Policy

As President Obama has stated, the Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a

clear presumption that openness prevails. All Agency personnel should ensure that this principle of

openness is applied to the extent possible when responding to a FOIA request. Managers should

give their staffs and the Agency’s FOIA professionals the support needed to satisfy FOIA’s

transparency requirement in as timely and efficient a manner as possible. In accordance with

guidance issued by Attorney General Holder on March 19, 2009, EPA offices should exercise their

discretion in favor of disclosing documents whenever possible under the FOIA. Offices should assert

an exemption to disclosure only where the Agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm

an interest protected by an exemption or disclosure is prohibited by law. Offices should also take

steps to make information public on the Agency’s Web site without waiting for a request from the

public to do so. More detailed FOIA implementation procedures will be provided in the near future

to assist you in carrying out this important government responsibility.

Because EPA is a public regulatory agency and employer to about 18,000 employees, EPA staff

may come into possession of certain information that may need to be protected from disclosure

under FOIA, including certain contract or business data, trade secrets, or personal privacy

information. Although the Agency’s business is to be conducted in an open and accountable

manner, we must also ensure that information entitled to special protection is handled with the

utmost care and in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Questions about

whether special protections apply to certain information should be directed to the Office of General

Counsel’s General Law Office.

Rulemaking Proceedings

Much of EPA’s business is conducted through rulemaking. It is crucial that we apply the principles

of transparency and openness to the rulemaking process. This can only occur if EPA clearly

explains the basis for its decisions and the information considered by the Agency appears in the

rulemaking record. Therefore, each EPA employee should ensure that all written comments

regarding a proposed rule received from members of the public, including regulated entities and

interested parties, are entered into the rulemaking docket.

Robust dialogue with the public enhances the quality of our decisions. EPA offices conducting

rulemaking are therefore encouraged to reach out as broadly as possible for the views of interested

parties. However, while EPA may and often should meet with groups and individuals, we should

attempt, to the maximum extent practicable, to provide all interested persons with equal access to

EPA. In addition, it is essential to ensure that the public receives timely notice, as far as

practicable, of information or views that have influenced EPA’s decisions. This means that EPA

employees must summarize in writing and place in the rulemaking docket any oral communication

during a meeting or telephone discussion with a member of the public or an interested group that

contains significant new factual information regarding a proposed rule.

Questions about how to handle comments and other communications regarding a proposed rule

should be directed to the appropriate program office personnel, attorneys in the Office of General

Counsel, or regional staff working on the specific rulemaking.

I am committed to fulfilling President Obama’s direction to agency heads to make use of tools and

technology to increase outreach and interaction with the public. Public participation in Agency

rulemaking proceedings may take a variety of forms, including public hearings and meetings,

workshops, forums, focus groups, surveys, roundtables, Federal Register notice-and-comment

procedures, advisory committee meetings, informal meetings with interested parties, internetbased dialogues, and other opportunities for informal dialogue, consistent with applicable legal

requirements. I encourage our staff to be creative and innovative in the tools we use to engage the

public in our decision-making.

Litigation and Formal Adjudication
Memo to EPA Employees | Administrator Lisa Jackson | US EPA

http://www.epa.gov/Administrator/operationsmemo.html#g[3/22/2012 11:40:23 AM]

EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us

http://www.epa.gov/Administrator/operationsmemo.html

Print As-Is

Last updated on Wednesday, December 21, 2011

EPA is engaged in a wide range of litigation. The conduct of litigation by the Agency should reflect

the principles of fairness and openness that apply to other EPA activities. However, we must also

protect privileged litigation and enforcement-sensitive information from unauthorized disclosure.

Communication with parties involved in litigation with EPA about that litigation should be through

an attorney representing EPA in the case. Program personnel who receive inquiries about pending

litigation from persons who are not parties to the litigation should consult with an attorney

representing EPA in the case before responding. If you do not know which attorneys are

representing EPA in a specific case, contact knowledgeable EPA lawyers, including the Office of

General Counsel, the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, or an Office of Regional

Counsel, as appropriate.

Formal adjudications (including certain administrative penalty proceedings and pesticide

cancellation proceedings) are also governed by specific requirements that limit communications

between EPA staff and interested parties. These limitations appear in the various EPA rules

governing those proceedings. Information about these rules is available from the Office of General

Counsel and on the EPA Intranet.

Contacts with Congress and the Press

EPA often receives requests for records or information from Congress, i.e. the Speaker of the

House, the President of the Senate, the Chair of a Committee or Subcommittee with jurisdiction

over EPA. It also receives informal requests from individual members of Congress and their staffs. I

recognize the importance of Congressional oversight and encourage our programs to provide

Congress with the information necessary to satisfy its oversight and legislative interests to the

extent possible and consistent with our Constitutional and statutory obligations. Information

requests from Congress should be handled in consultation with managers of the affected EPA

programs and our legislative affairs staff in the Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental

Relations.

EPA also should be accessible to the press, which performs a vital role in informing the public

about EPA’s actions. As we respond to press inquiries, the EPA staff should respect our internal

deliberative processes and strive for accuracy and integrity in our communications. This will

ultimately enhance public trust in the Agency. When interacting with the press in the performance

of your official duties, please coordinate with the managers of your program and media relations

experts in the Office of Public Affairs.

Nothing contained in this memorandum interferes with your right to petition or to furnish

information to Congress or a Member of Congress, as provided under applicable law, or to engage

in protected whistleblowing activities.

Communications Generally

The Office of Public Affairs plays a central role in shaping the Agency’s communications with the

public. OPA will be providing further guidance on how our programs and regions should coordinate

with it on the preparation of messaging materials and interactions with the press.

Conclusion

I have the utmost confidence in the ability of EPA’s workforce to promote full public involvement

and openness in all EPA affairs. I believe this will enhance the credibility of the Agency, boost

public trust in our actions and improve the quality of our decisions. In short, we will let more

sunlight into our Agency. I look forward to hearing any additional ideas you may have on how we

can achieve this goal.

As I continue to work with all of you, I plan to provide further thoughts on how we can strengthen

EPA’s public role in serving the needs of the public and advancing our environmental protection

mission.