**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-K**

(Mark One)

**x****  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021or**

**o**** ****TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the transition period from _____ to _____Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-193376-23**

**Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity:0001651790**

**COMM 2015-CCRE26 Mortgage Trust**

**(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001013454**

**Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation**

**(exact name of the depositor as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541294**

**German American Capital Corporation**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001558761**

**Cantor Commercial Real EstateLending, L.P.**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001555524**

**LoanCore Capital Markets LLC**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

**(formerly known as Jefferies LoanCore LLC)**

** **

| **New York****(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization of**

**the issuing entity)** | **38-3979769**

**38-3979770**

**38-7143624**

**(I.R.S. Employer**

**Identification Numbers)** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**c/o Wells Fargo Bank, National Association**

**as Certificate Administrator**

**9062 Old Annapolis Road**

**Columbia, MD**

**(Address of principalexecutive offices of the issuing entity)**

**21045**

**(Zip Code)**

**Registrant’s telephone number,including area code:**

**(212) 250-2500**

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each  exchange on which registered |
|---------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| None                |              |                                       |

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of theAct:  None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-knownseasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required tofile reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filedall reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has beensubject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  ⌧ Yes oNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submittedelectronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every InteractiveData File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and postsuch files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filerspursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is notcontained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sknowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated byreference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.   

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smallerreporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “largeaccelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large acceleratedfiler        o                                                                                                       Accelerated filer                                     o

Non-acceleratedfiler          ⌧  (Do not check if asmaller reporting company)                          Smaller reporting company                    o

                                                                                                                                                       Emerging growthcompany                    o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if theregistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complyingwith any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed areport on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectivenessof its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of theSarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firmthat prepared or issued its audit report. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o Yes ⌧ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-votingcommon equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price atwhich the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price ofsuch common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s mostrecently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed alldocuments and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securitiesunder a plan confirmed by a court.  oYes oNo

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of theregistrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE**

** **

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated byreference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) intowhich the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders;(2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuantto Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documentsshould be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report tosecurity holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

 

** **

**EXPLANATORY NOTES**

The Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 10.5% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date, is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loancombination that includes the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan and three other *paripassu* loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. This loancombination, including the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan, is being servicedand administered pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which isincorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on theExhibit Index) with respect to the Heartland Industrial Portfolio MortgageLoan, which constituted approximately 3.2% of the asset pool of the issuingentity as of its cut-off date.  The Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan is an asset of the issuing entity and is part of a loancombination that includes the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan andtwo other *pari passu* loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity.A *pari passu* portion of the loan combination was securitized in the COMM2015-CCRE25 Mortgage Trust transaction, Commission File Number 333-193376-22(the “COMM 2015-CCRE25 Transaction”). This loan combination, includingthe Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, is being serviced andadministered pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM2015-CCRE25 Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 tothis Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on theExhibit Index) with respect to the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 6.4% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date.  The 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan is an asset of theissuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the 11 MadisonAvenue Mortgage Loan, fifteen other *pari passu* loans and threesubordinate companion loans, which are not assets of the issuing entity. A *paripassu* portion of the loan combination was securitized in the MAD 2015-11MDMortgage Trust transaction (the “MAD 2015-11MD Transaction”). This loancombination, including the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, is being servicedand administered pursuant to the trust and servicing agreement for the MAD2015-11MD Transaction, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 tothis Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The master servicer of a poolingand servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement also functions as theprimary servicer of the related mortgage loans serviced and administeredpursuant to such agreement unless a separate primary servicer is identifiedherein.  If this report does not identify a separate primary servicer, theservicer compliance statement provided by the master servicer under any suchagreement also encompasses its responsibilities as primary servicer of therelated mortgage loan or mortgage loans.

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation is the master servicer and certificate administrator of themortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and theprimary servicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan. As aresult, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined inItem 1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above,because it is servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of theassets of the issuing entity as of its cut-off date. The assessments ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reportsand servicer compliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation in the capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark is an affiliate of Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending L.P., one ofthe sponsors.  Therefore, the Depositor included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K a servicer compliance statement for Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark pursuant to Item 1123.  Because Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/aNewmark is servicing less than 5% of the pool assets, an assessment ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria and an accountants’ attestationreport pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB are not required by RegulationAB.  As the attestation made in the servicer compliance statement requiredby Item 1123 relates to a review of the servicing activities of Berkeley PointCapital LLC d/b/a Newmark under the applicable servicing agreement, and thatreview was conducted in conjunction with the servicer’s preparation of itsassessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, that assessment ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria and the accompanying accountants’attestation report are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the sakeof completeness.

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation acts as trustee of  the mortgage loans serviced under thePooling and Servicing Agreement, the Heartland Industrial Portfolio MortgageLoan and the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan.  Pursuant to the Pooling andServicing Agreement, the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM2015-CCRE25 Transaction and the trust and servicing agreement for the MAD2015-11MD Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessment ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria solely with respect to Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guaranteesregarding collections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or otherfees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified inthe transaction agreements). However, during the reporting period, the trusteedid not perform any servicing function with respect to the servicing criteriaspecified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.  The master servicer orthe special servicer, to the extent required, performed the servicing functionidentified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, and each suchparty included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB in the assessment ofcompliance with applicable servicing criteria and accountant’s attestationreport for the subject transaction.  As a result, this Annual Report onForm 10-K does not include an assessment of compliance with applicableservicing criteria of the trustee. One or more other servicers of  themortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, theHeartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the 11 Madison Avenue MortgageLoan have delivered one or more assessments of compliance with respect to Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria andaccountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Solutions, LLC.  Thisentity was engaged by the master servicer under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement (except with respect to those mortgage loans for which Berkeley PointCapital LLC d/b/a Newmark is the primary servicer)  and the primaryservicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan to remit taxpayments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers to local taxingauthorities, to report tax amounts due, to verify tax parcel information, andto verify non-escrow tax payments. These servicing functions are includedwithin the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(4)(xi) and1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB.  Therefore, under the principles-baseddefinition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB that looksto the functions that an entity performs, this vendor is a “servicer” for thepurposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  *See* Compliance andDisclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria,accountants’ attestation report and servicer compliance statement fromComputershare Trust Company, National Association (“CTCNA”).  CTCNAwas engaged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”),in its capacity as certificate administrator and custodian, to perform certainspecified servicing functions identified in the assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports.  WellsFargo engaged CTCNA in connection with the sale of Wells Fargo’s corporatetrust services business to CTCNA and its affiliates.  Further, under theprinciples-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) ofRegulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, this partyis a “servicer” for the purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB.  See Complianceand Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

Theassessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’attestation reports and servicer compliance statements of the certificateadministrator of the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan and the HeartlandIndustrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan are omitted from this Annual Report on Form10-K as the certificate administrator pursuant to the related pooling andservicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement does not perform anyactivities that address servicing criteria with respect to the issuing entityand because they are each not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.

With respect to the *pari passu*loan combinations that include the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loanand the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, (i) the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria and attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria of LNR Partners, LLC as special servicer ofthe Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas as custodian of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan andPentalpha Surveillance LLC as operating advisor of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted from thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K as they are not required to be included on thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K per Instruction 3 to Item 1122 of Regulation AB becausethey are parties performing activities that address servicing criteria relatingto 5% or less of the assets of the issuing entity; and (ii) the servicercompliance statements of LNR Partners, LLC as special servicer of the HeartlandIndustrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan and KeyBank National Association as primaryservicer and special servicer of the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan, listed onthe Exhibit Index are omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as they arenot required by Item 1123 of Regulation AB to be included on this Annual Reporton Form 10-K because they are each an unaffiliated party that is not a“servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) ofRegulation AB.

**PART I**

**Item 1.  Business.**

Omitted.

**Item 1A.  Risk Factors.**

Omitted.

**Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.**

None.

**Item 2.  Properties.**

Omitted.

**Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.**

Omitted.

**Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.**

Not applicable.

**PART II**

**Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.**

Omitted.

**Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations.**

Omitted.

**Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosuresAbout Market Risk.**

Omitted.

**Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements WithAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.**

Omitted.

**Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.**

Omitted.

**Item 9B.  Other Information.**

None.

**PART III**

**Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and CorporateGovernance.**

Omitted.

**Item 11.  Executive Compensation.**

Omitted.

**Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain BeneficialOwners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.**

Omitted.

**Item 13.  Certain Relationships and RelatedTransactions, and Director Independence.**

Omitted.

**Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services.**

Omitted.

**ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB**

**Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant ObligorFinancial Information.**

The Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan(Loan Number 1 on Annex A-1 of the prospectus supplement of the registrantrelating to the issuing entity filed on October 7, 2015 pursuant to Rule424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement. Inaccordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited netoperating income of the significant obligor was $45,003,152.77 for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2021.

**Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant EnhancementProvider Financial Information.**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external creditenhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction asdescribed under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

**Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain DerivativesInstruments (Financial Information).**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides anyderivative instruments or other support for the certificates within thistransaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

**Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.**

The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceedinginvolving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routinelitigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and thefollowing, with respect to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, ascertificate administrator and as custodian, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as certificate administrator and as custodian, and CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as special servicer.

 

In December 2014, Phoenix LightSF Limited and certain related entities and the National Credit UnionAdministration (NCUA) filed complaints in the United States District Court forthe Southern District of New York against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claimsagainst Wells Fargo Bank in its capacity as trustee for a number of residentialmortgage-backed securities trusts. Complaints raising similar allegations havebeen filed by Commerzbank AG in the Southern District of New York and by IKBInternational and IKB Deutsche Industriebank in New York state court. In eachcase, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee, caused losses toinvestors, and plaintiffs assert causes of action based upon, among otherthings, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify and enforce repurchaseobligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representationsand warranties, notify investors of alleged events of default, and abide byappropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Wells FargoBank previously settled two class action lawsuits with similar allegations thatwere filed in November 2014 and December 2016 by institutional investors in theSouthern District of New York and New York state court, respectively. Inaddition, Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC have filed complaints in NewYork state court alleging Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, failed to takeappropriate actions upon learning of defective mortgage loan documentation. InMarch 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to resolve the case filed bythe NCUA.

 

In addition to the foregoingcases, in August 2014 and August 2015 Nomura Credit & Capital Inc. (“Nomura”)and Natixis Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Natixis”) filed a total of seventhird-party complaints against Wells Fargo Bank in New York state court. In theunderlying first-party actions, Nomura and Natixis have been sued for allegedbreaches of representations and warranties made in connection with residentialmortgage-backed securities sponsored by them. In the third-party actions,Nomura and Natixis allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as master servicer, primaryservicer or securities administrator, failed to notify Nomura and Natixis oftheir own breaches, failed to properly oversee the primary servicers, andfailed to adhere to accepted servicing practices. Natixis additionally allegesthat Wells Fargo Bank failed to perform default oversight duties. Wells FargoBank has asserted counterclaims alleging that Nomura and Natixis failed toprovide Wells Fargo Bank notice of their representation and warranty breaches.

 

With respect to each of the foregoing litigations, WellsFargo Bank believes plaintiffs' claims are without merit and intends to contestthe claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of thelitigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank orthe related RMBS trusts.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) andDeutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued byinvestors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certainresidential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. 

On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including fundsmanaged by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed anaction against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging thatDBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties, as trustees for 544private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations andwarranties as to mortgage loans held by the trusts and to enforce breaches byservicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from NewYork State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S.District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRock SDNYCase”) and the other in the Superior Court of California, Orange County(the “BlackRock California Case”).  Pursuant to a settlement amongthe parties, the BlackRock SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018, and theBlackRock California Case was dismissed on January 11, 2019.

On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to acase brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SFLimited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, inwhich the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served astrustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue.  On September 27, 2017,plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant inaddition to DBNTC.  DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts atissue.  DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the U.S.Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach offiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of New York’s StreitAct; and breach of the covenant of good faith.  However, in the thirdamended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to thecase, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and grossnegligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of goodfaith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, andplaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.”  OnNovember 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amendedcomplaint.  On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion forsummary judgment.  Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly withCommerzbank AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partialsummary judgment.  On October 27, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed asupplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’standing.  On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which itgranted DBNTC and DBTCA’s supplemental motion for summary judgment, granted inpart DBNTC and DBTCA’s initial motion for summary judgment, and deniedplaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment.  As a result of thatorder, all of plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice.

On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to acase brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. DistrictCourt for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previouslyalleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts atissue.  On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaintthat names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC.  DBTCA serves astrustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue.  DBNTC serves as trustee for theother 49 trusts at issue.  Commerzbank’s second amended complaint bringsclaims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty;negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of goodfaith.  However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledgesthat, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIAclaims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well asits Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, andCommerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank tosuffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does notinclude a demand for money damages in a sum certain.  On January 29, 2018,DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint.  OnDecember 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Lightplaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment.  On February 8,2022, the court issued an order in which it granted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’smotion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summaryjudgment.  As a result of that order, many of plaintiffs’ claims andtheories were dismissed with prejudice.  Discovery is ongoing.

On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidationand IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as aninvestor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court ofthe State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees ofthe trusts.  On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claimsfor breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoidconflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA,violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the UniformCommercial Code.  IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for overU.S. $268 million in damages.  On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA,together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a jointmotion to dismiss.  On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKB voluntarilydismissed with prejudice all claims as to seven trusts.  On January 27,2021, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion todismiss.  The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to IKB’sclaims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and Section 9 of theUniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breachof contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the TIA.  Thecourt denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss.  IKB’s remainingclaims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty toavoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed.  OnMay 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the New YorkSupreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, regarding certain aspects ofthe court’s order on the motion to dismiss.  That appeal has been fullybriefed.  On May 20, 2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with respectto other aspects of that order.  That appeal is being briefed.  OnJune 2, 2021, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects ofthe court’s order on the motion to dismiss, which the court denied on August 3,2021.  On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to thecomplaint.  On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation,voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additionaltrusts.  On December 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation,voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to one additionaltrust.  Discovery is ongoing.

It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings(including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed inthe foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to performits duties under the related servicing agreement for this transaction.

From time to time, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, a Delawarelimited liability company (“CWCAM”), is a party to lawsuits and otherlegal proceedings as part of its duties as a special servicer (e.g.,enforcement of loan obligations) and/or arising in the ordinary course ofbusiness.  Other than as set forth in the following paragraphs, there arecurrently no legal proceedings pending, and no legal proceedings known to becontemplated by governmental authorities, against CWCAM or of which any of itsproperty is the subject, that are material to the certificateholders.

On December 17, 2015, U.S. Bank National Association, thetrustee under five pooling and servicing agreements for (i) Wachovia BankCommercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30, (ii) COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2,(iii) Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C31, (iv) ML-CFC CommercialMortgage Trust 2007-5 and (v) ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6 commenceda proceeding with the Second Judicial District Court of Ramsey County, Minnesota(the “State Court”) for a declaratory judgment as to the properallocation of certain proceeds (“Disputed Proceeds”) received by CWCAMin connection with the sale of the Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Townproperty in New York, New York securing loans held by those trusts.  CWCAMwas the special servicer of such property.  The petition requests theState Court to instruct the trustee, the trust beneficiaries, and any otherinterested parties as to the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any, that constitutepenalty interest and/or the amount of the Disputed Proceeds, if any, thatconstitute gain-on-sale proceeds, with respect to each trust.  On February24, 2016, CWCAM made a limited appearance with the State Court to file a motionto dismiss this proceeding based on lack of jurisdiction, mootness, standingand forum non conveniens.  On July 19, 2016, the State Court deniedCWCAM’s motion to dismiss.  On July 22, 2016, the action was removed tofederal court in Minnesota (“Federal Court”).  On October 21, 2016,the Federal Court held a hearing on the motion to transfer the action to theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNYCourt”), a motion to remand to state court and a motion to hear CWCAM’srequest for reconsideration of the motion to dismiss.  On March 14, 2017,the Federal Court reserved the determination on the motion to hear CWCAM’srequest for reconsideration of the motion to dismiss, denied the motion toremand the matter to state court and granted the motion to transfer theproceeding to the SDNY Court.  Cross motions for judgment on the pleadingswere filed but the SDNY Court was unable to decide the case based on thepleadings and the SDNY Court ordered discovery.  All fact discovery wascompleted in December, 2018 and expert discovery was completed on March 15,2019.  The parties submitted cross motions for summary judgment, and onMarch 19, 2020, the SDNY Court entered an opinion andorder in which it granted summary judgment in CWCAM’s favor and held that CWCAMwas entitled to the entire amount of penalty interest and that CWCAM’sdetermination of Yield Maintenance was correct.  In the 127-page opinion,the SDNY Court found for CWCAM on every issue presented by the trustee’spetition, namely, that the funds in dispute constitute penalty interest andyield maintenance, not gain-on-sale proceeds, and that the amount of penaltyinterest and yield maintenance was correctly calculated. An appeal of the SDNYCourt’s decision was taken on April 29, 2020.  Oral argument on the appealoccurred on June 21, 2021. The parties await the decision of the appealscourt.  

On December 1, 2017, a complaint against CWCAM and others wasfiled in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkstyled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital Investments LLC, et al., No.17-cv-9463 (the “Original Complaint”). The gravamen of theOriginal  Complaint alleged breaches of a contract and fiduciary duties byCWCAM’s affiliate, CWCapital Investments LLC in its capacity as collateralmanager for the collateralized debt obligation transaction involving CWCapitalCobalt Vr, Ltd. In total, there are 14 counts pled in the Original Complaint.Of those 14, 5 claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breachof fiduciary duty, conversion and unjust enrichment. On May 23, 2018, theOriginal Complaint was dismissed for lack of subject matterjurisdiction.   On June 28, 2018, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. filed asubstantially similar complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York,County of New York styled as CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd. v. CWCapital InvestmentsLLC, et al., Index No. 653277/2018 (the “New Complaint”).  Thegravamen of the New Complaint is the same as the previous complaint filed inthe United State District Court for the Southern District of New York.  Intotal there are 16 counts pled in the New Complaint. Of those 16 counts, 5claims were asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciaryduty, conversion and unjust enrichment, 1 count seeks a declaratory judgementthat the plaintiff has the right to enforce the contracts in question and 1count seeks an injunction requiring the defendants to recognize the plaintiffas the directing holder for the trusts in question. On January 11, 2019, theplaintiff dismissed with prejudice the declaratory judgment and injunctioncounts.  The New Complaint and related summons was not served on thedefendants until July 13, 2018 and July 16, 2018.  The plaintiff’s motionfor a preliminary injunction was denied by the court on July 31, 2018.  OnAugust 3, 2018, the defendants, including CWCAM, filed a motion to dismiss theNew Complaint in its entirety. On August 20, 2019, the court entered an ordergranting defendants’ motion almost in its entirety, dismissing 11 of the 16counts and partially dismissing 2 additional counts.  Of the remainingcounts, 2 are asserted against CWCAM for aiding and abetting breach offiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.  On September 19, 2019, CWCapital CobaltVr Ltd. filed a notice of appeal relating to the August 20, 2019 dismissalorder and on September 26, 2019, filed an amended complaint against CWCI andCWCAM attempting to address deficiencies relating to certain of the claimsdismissed by the August, 20, 2019 order.  CWCI and CWCAM filed its Motionto Dismiss the amended complaint on October 28, 2019.  The court heardargument on the Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint on January 22, 2020 andon October 23, 2020, the court granted the motion dismissing the amendedclaims.  On November 30, 2020, CWCapital Cobalt Vr Ltd filed a notice ofappeal relating to the October 23, 2020 dismissal order.  On April 27,2021, the First Department affirmed the dismissal as to claims against CWCAMthat were part of the August 20, 2019 dismissal, but reversed the dismissal oftwo counts for breach of the Collateral Management Agreement againstCWCI.  CWCI has sought leave to file an appeal of the decision.  Bothrequests for leave were denied by the First Department.  The plaintiff hasalso sought leave to appeal the dismissal of the claims against CWCAM. CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under the related poolingand servicing agreements in good faith and the remaining allegations in the NewComplaint are without merit.  

On January 24, 2016 PSW NYC LLCcommenced a complaint (the “PSW Complaint”) with the Supreme Court of the Stateof New York, County of New York (the “PSW Court”) against Bank of America, N.A.as trustee under the pooling and servicing agreements for Wachovia BankCommercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C30 and COBALT CMBS Commercial Trust 2007-C2,U.S. Bank National Association as trustee under the pooling and servicingagreements for Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C31, ML-CFC CommercialMortgage Trust 2007-5 and ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-6(collectively, the “PSW Trusts”), PCV-M Holdings LLC and CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, individually and as special servicer for the PSW Trusts(collectively, the “Defendants”) seeking either (a) damages in an amount to bedetermined by the PSW Court but alleged by the plaintiffs to be approximately$500,000,000 – such amount being the amount PSW NYC LLC alleges would have beenrecovered on certain mezzanine loans (the “PCVST Mezzanine Loans”) related tothe Peter Cooper Village and Stuyvesant Town property (the “PCVST Property”) inNew York City which PSW NYC LLC sold to an entity related to the Defendantspursuant to a settlement agreement related to certain prior litigation (the“2010 Settlement Agreement”) or (b) the rescission of the 2010 SettlementAgreement which would result in, among other things, the rescission of the saleof the PCVST Mezzanine Loans and a claim for certain proceeds from the sale ofthe PCVST Property. PSW NYC LLC alleges that the Defendants procured the 2010Settlement Agreement by fraud and further that the terms of the 2010 SettlementAgreement were breached by the Defendants. On February 26, 2016, CWCAM onbehalf of itself and the other Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the PSWComplaint (the “CWCAM Motion to Dismiss”). On April 11, 2016, PSW NYC LLCopposed the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss and cross-moved for a partial summaryjudgment on liability regarding allegations of breach of the 2010 SettlementAgreement (the “PSW Cross-Motion”). On May 5, 2016, the Defendants subsequentlyfiled its reply and opposition to the PSW Cross-Motion. On August 23, 2016,oral arguments were provided to the PSW Court regarding the PSW Complaint, theCWCAM Motion to Dismiss and the PSW Cross-Motion and the PSW Court took sucharguments under advisement. On October 31, 2016, the PSW Court issued an ordergranting the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss, denying the PSW Cross-Motion anddismissing the PSW Complaint with prejudice. Subsequently, PSW NYC LLC filed anotice of appeal relating to such order. On February 21, 2017, PSW NYC LLCfiled its appeal and supporting brief arguing that the PSW Court erred byfinding no breach of the assignment agreement and no fraudulent inducement.Oral argument was heard on May 4, 2017 at which point the court took thearguments under advisement. On May 25, 2017, the New York 1stDepartment appellate court affirmed the dismissal of all PSW claims and denieda request for leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals on September 12,2017.

On March 31, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding II LTD. (“RAITPreferred Funding”) commenced a complaint (“RAIT Complaint”) withthe Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “RAITCourt”), claiming it owns $18,500,000 of a mortgage loan secured by thedevelopment of the One Congress Street Property in Boston, Massachusetts (the “Loan”)and seeking (a) a declaratory judgment stating that RAIT Preferred Funding isthe directing lender under a co-lender agreement dated March 28, 2007 and apooling and servicing agreement dated March 1, 2007 (collectively, the “OperativeAgreements”) and was the directing lender at the time of the impropermodification of the Loan, (b) a declaratory judgment stating that RAIT PreferredFunding has the right to terminate the special servicer, (c) monetary damagesfor the value of the bonds and fees paid to CWCAM as the special servicer ofthe Loan and (d) other things.  On May 17, 2016, CWCAM filed a motion todismiss the RAIT Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) stating that the RAITComplaint did not state a claim and the essential facts of the RAIT Complaintare negated by affidavits and evidentiary materials submitted with the RAITComplaint.  On June 14, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding filed a Memorandum ofLaw in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Opposition”) stating thatthe claims in the RAIT Complaint were properly stated.  On June 30, 2016,CWCAM filed a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss and in response to theOpposition, stating that each of CWCAM’s arguments is supported by the expresslanguage of the agreements between the parties, the documentary evidence andNew York case law.  On September 30, 2016, RAIT Preferred Funding andCWCAM entered into a confidential Settlement Agreement (the “2016 Settlement”),which provides for a stay of the RAIT Preferred Funding litigation (the “LitigationStay”) through August 25, 2017.  Pursuant to the terms of the 2016Settlement, upon satisfaction of a term of the 2016 Settlement by August 25,2017 (or such later date agreed to by the parties), the RAIT Preferred Fundinglitigation will be dismissed, with prejudice.  On May 19, 2017 theBorrower repaid the Loan in accordance with the terms of the notes andsatisfied the condition to dismissal with prejudice.  RAIT has refused todismiss the case and is claiming that the B Note should be paid in full. CWCAM believes that it has performed its obligations under the OperativeAgreements in good faith, and that the action should be dismissed withprejudice.  On August 29, 2017, the RAIT Court granted leave to RAITPreferred Funding to amend its complaint.  On September 20, 2017, RAITPreferred Funding filed an Amended Complaint (the “RAIT Amended Complaint”),which omits its original claims, adds Wells Fargo Bank as a defendant, andseeks (a) specific performance requiring repayment of the $18,500,000 principalamount of the B Note or, in the alternative, monetary damages, including the$18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note, in an amount to be determined attrial, (b) monetary damages on any fees paid to CWCAM as special servicer orWells Fargo Bank as master servicer in connection with the borrower’s repaymentof the Loan, (c) a declaratory judgment that RAIT Preferred Funding is entitledto recover the full $18,500,000 principal amount of the B Note, (d) punitivedamages against CWCAM, and (e) other things.  On October 11, 2017, CWCAMfiled a motion to dismiss the RAIT Amended Complaint (“CWCAM Motion toDismiss Amended Complaint”) stating that the RAIT Amended Complaint did notstate a claim and the essential facts of the RAIT Amended Complaint are negatedby the Operative Agreements and other admissible evidentiary materials. On November 13, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank filed a motion to dismiss the RAITAmended Complaint (the “Wells Fargo Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint”)and joined the CWCAM Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint.  On January 29,2018, the court dismissed all claims but for breach of contract and discoveryhas commenced.  CWCAM filed a Motion for Summary Judgement on March 18,2019.   This matter was settled and the case dismissed on May 15,2019.  

**Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and CertainRelationships and Related Transactions.**

The information regarding this Item has been previouslyprovided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuingentity filed on October 7, 2015 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).

**Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria.**

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attachedhereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as ScheduleII to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entitiesparticipating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for eachapplicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the poolingand servicing agreement for the COMM 2015-CCRE25 Transaction, are attachedhereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as ScheduleII to the pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2015-CCRE25 Transactionincorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K isa chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for theCOMM 2015-CCRE25 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan,which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the trust and servicingagreement for the MAD 2015-11MD Transaction, are attached hereto under Item 15to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule I to the trust andservicing agreement for the MAD 2015-11MD Transaction incorporated by referenceas Exhibit 4.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying theentities participating in a servicing function for the MAD 2015-11MDTransaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d).

**Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.**

The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibitsto this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

**PART IV**

**Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules**

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part ofthis Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

(3) See below

4.1          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1,2015, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Current Reporton Form 8-K/A filed on December 8, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23and incorporated by reference herein).

4.2          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1,2015, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as a Special Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as aSpecial Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed asExhibit 99.6 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 7,2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated by referenceherein).

4.3          Trust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 6,2015, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, KeyBank National Association, as Master Servicer and SpecialServicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian (filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-Kfiled on October 7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 andincorporated by reference herein).

31           Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

33           Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

33.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

33.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

33.3        Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted. See ExplanatoryNotes.)

33.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

33.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

33.6        Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor

33.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

33.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

33.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021

33.10      Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark, asPrimary Servicer

33.11      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.12      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)

33.13      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Prudential PlazaMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.14      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodianof the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.15      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)

33.16      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.17      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.18      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.19      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.20      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.21      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.22      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.23      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit33.7)

33.24      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicerof the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan

33.25      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicerof the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.24)

33.26      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

33.27      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.28      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

34           Attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

34.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

34.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

34.3        Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee (Omitted. See ExplanatoryNotes.)

34.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

34.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

34.6        Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor

34.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

34.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

34.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021

34.10      Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark, asPrimary Servicer

34.11      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.12      CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)

34.13      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Prudential PlazaMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.14      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.15      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)

34.16      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.17      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.18      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.19      LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio MortgageLoan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.20      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.21      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.22      Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Heartland IndustrialPortfolio Mortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.23      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit34.7)

34.24      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicerof the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan

34.25      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicerof the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.24)

34.26      Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee of the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

34.27      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the 11 Madison Avenue Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.28      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

35           Servicer compliance statements.

35.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

35.2        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer

35.3        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator

35.4        Berkeley Point Capital LLC d/b/a Newmark, asPrimary Servicer

35.5        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

35.6        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.7        CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prudential Plaza Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)

35.8        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Heartland Industrial Portfolio Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.9        LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer of the Heartland Industrial PortfolioMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

35.10      KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer of the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

35.11      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer of the 11 Madison AvenueMortgage Loan (Omitted. See Explanatory Notes.)

99.1         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of September28, 2015, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation andGerman American Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’sCurrent Report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 8, 2015 under Commission FileNo. 333-193376-23 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.2         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of September28, 2015, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation andCantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on December 8, 2015 underCommission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.3         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of September28, 2015, between Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation andJefferies LoanCore LLC (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant’s CurrentReport on Form 8-K/A filed on December 8, 2015 under Commission File No.333-193376-23 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.4         Primary Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2015,between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Berkeley Point Capital LLC (filedas Exhibit 99.4 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated by referenceherein)

99.5         Co-lender Agreement, dated as of September 6, 2015,between German American Capital Corporation, as Initial Note A-1 Holder, MorganStanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note A-2 Holder, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Initial Note A-3 Holder, German American Capital Corporation,as Initial Note B-1 Holder, Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., as Initial Note B-2Holder, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Initial Note B-3 Holder(filed as Exhibit 99.7 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed onOctober 7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated byreference herein)

99.6         Co-lender Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2015, betweenGerman American Capital Corporation, as Note A-1 Holder, German AmericanCapital Corporation, as Note A-2 Holder, and German American Capital Corporation,as Note A-3 Holder (filed as Exhibit 99.8 to the registrant’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on October 7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 andincorporated by reference herein)

99.7         Co-lender Agreement, dated as of October 8, 2015, betweenGerman American Capital Corporation, as Note A-1 Holder, German AmericanCapital Corporation, as Note A-2 Holder, German American Capital Corporation, asNote A-3 Holder, and German American Capital Corporation, as Note A-4 Holder(filed as Exhibit 99.9 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed onOctober 7, 2015 under Commission File No. 333-193376-23 and incorporated byreference herein)

(b)   The exhibits required to be filed by theRegistrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above.

(c)    Not Applicable.

 

**SIGNATURES**

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation(Depositor)

/s/ HelaineM. Kaplan

Helaine M.Kaplan, President

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)

Date: March 14, 2022

/s/ MattSmith

Matt Smith, Director

Date: March 14, 2022