alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 92 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 92

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  To designate the month of October 1993 as ``National Down Syndrome 
                           Awareness Month''.
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 92

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  To designate the month of October 1993 as ``National Down Syndrome 
                           Awareness Month''.

Whereas advancements in education, research, and public awareness are continuing 
        to improve the quality of life for people with Down syndrome;
Whereas approximately 5,000 children are born with Down syndrome annually in the 
        United States;
Whereas as ignorance, prejudices, myths, and stereotypes regarding Down syndrome 
        can be overcome only through increased awareness and education;
Whereas through the efforts of concerned physicians, teachers, parent groups, 
        and the National Down Syndrome Society, programs are being established 
        to educate the parents of individuals with Down syndrome, to include 
        people with Down syndrome in all school programs, to provide vocational 
        training for individuals with Down syndrome in preparation for entering 
        the work force, and to prepare young adults with Down syndrome for 
        independent living in the community;
Whereas the television medium has greatly augmented such efforts by casting 
        actors with Down syndrome and by offering programming that demonstrates 
        to hundreds of thousands of viewers in a positive and educational manner 
        the everyday, personal, and family effects of living with Down syndrome;
Whereas advancements in research are improving health care and offering a 
        brighter outlook for individuals born with Down syndrome; and
Whereas the many people with Down syndrome who attend regular schools, play on 
        Little League teams, work in corporations and businesses both large and 
        small, and volunteer in the community demonstrate daily the success that 
        people with Down syndrome are able to achieve: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the month of October 1993 
is designated as ``National Down Syndrome Awareness Month''. The 
President is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling 
upon the people of the United States to observe this month with the 
appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the Senate July 23 (legislative day, June 30), 1993.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
# C_2014245EN.01002101.xml

| 28.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/21

---

Action brought on 28 April 2014 — Cyprus v OHIM (XAΛΛOYMI)

(Case T-292/14)

2014/C 245/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 February 2014 given in Case R 1849/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 February 2014 given in Case R 1849/2013-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘XAΛΛOYMI’ for goods in Class 29 — Community trade mark application No 11 578 473

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application in its entirety

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and (b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 1.1234-4 Hedging transactions.

The character of gain or loss on an acquired or a written option that is (or is identified as being) part of a hedging transaction is determined under the rules of § 1.1221-2.

[T.D. 8555, 59 FR 36367, July 18, 1994]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GEORGE CYLE WILLIAMSON, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4316

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 11, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, 

Judge.

George Cyle Williamson, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.3490 Truncal orthosis. ( a ) *Identification.* A truncal orthosis is a device intended for medical purposes to support or to immobilize fractures, strains, or sprains of the neck or trunk of the body. Examples of truncal orthoses are the following: Abdominal, cervical, cervical-thoracic, lumbar, lumbo-sacral, rib fracture, sacroiliac, and thoracic orthoses and clavicle splints.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, regarding general requirements concerning records and § 820.198, regarding complaint files.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 38816, July 25, 2001]
CONNECTION BY ABUTTING OWNER WITH A PRIVATE SEWER.

Court of Appeals for Butler County.

#### Robert A. Bradley v. Jacob Schwab.

Decided, May, 1914.

*Sewers*— Injunction *Against Use by Abutting Owner of Private Sewer Does Not Lie, When.*

Connection with, a private sewer will not be enjoined on the claim that the sewer will be overloaded thereby, unsupported by evidence that plaintiff has suffered damage or that such a result as that complained of will follow.

*M. O. Burns,*for plaintiff.

*Clinton Egbert,*contra.

Jones, O. B., J.; Swing, J., and Jones, E. H., J., concur.

This case was brought in this court on appeal. It is an action by Robert A. Bradley seeking to enjoin Jacob Schwab from maintaining a sewer connection with a line of sewer pipe built' by plaintiff’s predecessor upon a ten foot strip of land in the rear of the lots of both parties, which connects with the pipe, sewer the premises of plaintiff and also the premises of defendant which lie north of plaintiff. Defendant owns property which lies north of plaintiff’s and also property south of plaintiff, which latter is a corner lot and abuts upon the alley in which is placed the public sewer to which the connection is- made.

The fee of this ten foot strip is vested in the defendant, but it is subject to an easement for ingress and egress appurtenant to the property of plaintiff. This five inch private sewer was built by plaintiff’s predecessor in title to drain his premises, and plaintiff is entitled to its use and to have it maintained in its present position. The sewer connection to the lot on the north has also existed for some time, and defendant is entitled to maintain it.

*158The question presented to the court arose at the time defendant undertook to connect a watercloset constructed in a shop in the rear part of his lot lying south of plaintiff. Plaintiff contends that such connection would overburden the private sewer and therefore interfere with his right of drainage, and, the connection having been made- in spite of his protest, he seeks to enjoin its further maintenance.

We are unable to find, from the testimony, that the tap which has been made by defendant has resulted in overburdening the pipe, or has in any way obstructed or interfered with plaintiff’s rights, and as the exercise of the right of injunction requires clear proof of the existence of the injury complained of, the court should not exercise its prerogative of interference so long as no injury has been suffered by plaintiff.

The petition will therefore be dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.
ATTACHMENT ON A CLAIM FOR NECESSARIES.

Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

#### Marie Corbett v. A. Goldwender.

Decided, January 16, 1905.

*Attachment*— Property *Other than Personal Earnings May he Attached on Claim for Necessaries.*

Property other than the personal earnings of debtor may be attached where the claim upon which judgment is asked is for necessaries.

Winch, J.; Hale, J., and Marvin,. J., concur.

Action was brought by defendant in error against plaintiff in error, before a justice of the peace to recover “the sum of $58 for necessities furnished, to-wit, necessary clothing and wearing apparel,” and upon the plaintiff’s affidavit the justice issued an order of attachment which was levied upon property of the defendant, including certain wearing apparel, but no part of the defendant’s personal earnings were taken or garnisheed in said proceedings. Motion by the defendant to dissolve the attachment being overruled, defendant appealed said motion to the common pleas court, where it was heard and again over*452ruled; the court, however, released the attached wearing apparel, holding that it was exempt from attachment.

By proper proceedings the case is properly before this court on error, and the sole question submitted for our consideration is whether, in an action for necessaries, where an attachment has been issued on the sole ground that the claim on which judgment is sought is for necessaries, property other than the personal earnings of the debtor can be attached? We answer this question in the affirmative. The trial court having come to the same conclusion, the judgment is affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1435 Maxwell spot. ( a ) *Identification.* A Maxwell spot is an AC-powered device that is a light source with a red and blue filter intended to test macular function.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
[55 FR 48442, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 63013, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38811, July 25, 2001]
STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                              SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                        DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                                       FILED 09:00 AM 03/07/2003
                                                             030154682 - 3624277



                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                            OKLAHOMA HILLS GAS, L.P.



     THE  UNDERSIGNED,  being the General Partner of OKLAHOMA HILLS GAS, L.P., a
limited  partnership formed pursuant to the provisions of Title 6, Chapter 17 of
the Delaware Code, does hereby make this Amendment to its Limited Partnership in
accordance  with  the  Delaware  Code  in  Article  3  as  follows:


     "3.     The  name  and  place  of  business  of  the  General  Partner  is:

                   NANG,  Incorporated
                   1286  Homer  Street,  Fourth  Floor
                   Vancouver,  British  Columbia
                   V6B  2Y5
                   Canada."

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I  have  hereunto set my hand this 5th day of March,
2003.

                                   General Partner:

                                   NANG, Incorporated


                                   By:    "JIM GLAVAS"
                                       -----------------------------
                                       JIM GLAVAS, PRESIDENT


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     WINSTON RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULES
       FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                     000815274
<NAME> WINSTON RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSDIARIES                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           1,643,000
<SECURITIES>                                     511,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,481,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     100,000
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10,827,000
<PP&E>                                           1,231,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   553,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11,993,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,414,000
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         32,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,242,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11,993,000
<SALES>                                          29,506,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 29,506,000
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    23,197,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,857,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,482,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     682,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              800,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     800,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .23
        

</TABLE>
§ 1.269-5 Time of acquisition of control. ( a ) *In general.* For purposes of section 269, an acquisition of control occurs when one or more persons acquire beneficial ownership of stock possessing at least 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote or at least 50 percent of the total value of share of all classes of stock of the corporation.
( b ) *Application of general rule to certain creditor acquisitions.* ( 1 ) For purposes of section 269, creditors of an insolvent or bankrupt corporation (by themselves or in conjunction with other persons) acquire control of the corporation when they acquire beneficial ownership of the requisite amount of stock. Although insolvency or bankruptcy may cause the interests of creditors to predominate as a practical matter, creditor interests do not constitute beneficial ownership of the corporation's stock. Solely for purposes of section 269, creditors of a bankrupt corporation are treated as acquiring beneficial ownership of stock of the corporation no earlier than the time a bankruptcy court confirms a plan of reorganization.
( 2 ) The provisions of this section are illustrated by the following example.
Example. Corporation *L* files a petition under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on January 5, 1987. A creditors' committee is formed. On February 22, 1987, and upon the request of the creditors, the bankruptcy court removes the debtor-in-possession from business management and operations and appoints a trustee. The trustee consults regularly with the creditors' committee in formulating both short-term and long-term management decisions. After three years, the creditors approve a plan of reorganization in which the outstanding stock of Corporation *L* is canceled and its creditors receive shares of stock constituting all of the outstanding shares. The bankruptcy court confirms the plan of reorganization on March 23, 1990, and the plan is put into effect on May 25, 1990. For purposes of section 269, the creditors acquired control of Corporation *L* than March 23, 1990. Similarly, the determination of whether the creditors acquired control of Corporation *L* no earlier with the principal purpose of evasion or avoidance of Federal income tax is made by reference to the creditors' purposes as of no earlier than March 23, 1990.
[T.D. 8388, 57 FR 346, Jan. 6, 1992]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Public Debt Limit

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance, 1815-					 and 	Eighty-Seventh Congress, 1961-1963. 						*Public Debt Limit : Hearing Before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Eighty-Seventh Congress, First Session, on H.R. 7677, June 27, 1961*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										June 27, 1961,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/789,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equ ipment Costs:

Tanks

This telephone contact report supports EPA’s development of purchased equipment cost equations for tanks by

documenting EPA's communication with a vendor regarding purchas e costs and information for tanks used in

the Steam Electric cost model.Project No.: 0172.08.029.044 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam

/Cost/Compliance Modeling

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 06/22/2011 Time: 1:45 pm PDT

Company Name: Fisher Tank Company Contact Name: Fred Ruinen

Phone No : (803)-359-4173 ext. 2713

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG

GENERAL SUBJECT: Vendor cost request for carbon steel fi eld-built tanks for a chemical precipitation wastewater tre atment system.



## TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On June 22, 2011 at 1:45 pm I contacted Mr. Fred Ruinen. I ex plained to Mr. Ruinen that we are working

on conceptual level costing of a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system to treat FGD (flue gas

desulfurization) wastewater from steam electric power plants, and as a part of this project we are trying to

collect cost information on different components or unit s of a chemical precipitation system.

I told Mr. Ruinen that we are interested in carbon st eel tanks. I requested information such as purchase cost,

cost for ancillary equipments and power consumption (if applicable). Mr. Ruinen stated that they provide only

field-built tanks. The tank sizes range from 30,000 gal to 10,000, 000 gal. The smallest tank is 15-16 feet in

diameter. Tank height increases in 8 foot increments. A 1,000,000 gal tank would be 60 feet in diameter and 40

feet tall. Typically, for wastewater treatment, tan ks are 16-24 feet tall and have a larger diameter. Mr. Ru inen

requested I email him our request and questions and he would follo w up via email.
§ 1.142-4 Use of proceeds to provide a facility. ( a ) *In general.* [Reserved]
( b ) *Reimbursement allocations.* If an expenditure for a facility is paid before the issue date of the bonds to provide that facility, the facility is described in section 142(a) only if the expenditure meets the requirements of § 1.150-2 (relating to reimbursement allocations). For purposes of this paragraph (b), if the proceeds of an issue are used to pay principal of or interest on an obligation other than a State or local bond (for example, temporary construction financing of the conduit borrower), that issue is not a refunding issue, and, thus, § 1.150-2(g) does not apply.
( c ) *Limitation on use of facilities by substantial users* — ( 1 ) *In general.* If the original use of a facility begins before the issue date of the bonds to provide the facility, the facility is not described in section 142(a) if any person that was a substantial user of the facility at any time during the 5-year period before the issue date or any related person to that user receives (directly or indirectly) 5 percent or more of the proceeds of the issue for the user's interest in the facility and is a substantial user of the facility at any time during the 5-year period after the issue date, unless— ( i ) An official intent for the facility is adopted under § 1.150-2 within 60 days after the date on which acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of that facility commenced; and
( ii ) For an acquisition, no person that is a substantial user or related person after the acquisition date was also a substantial user more than 60 days before the date on which the official intent was adopted.
( 2 ) *Definitions.* For purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, *substantial user* has the meaning used in section 147(a)(1), *related person* has the meaning used in section 144(a)(3), and a user that is a governmental unit within the meaning of § 1.103-1 is disregarded.
( d ) *Effective date* — ( 1 ) *In general.* This section applies to bonds sold on or after July 8, 1997. See § 1.103-8(a)(5) for rules applicable to bonds sold before that date.
( 2 ) *Elective retroactive application.* An issuer may apply this section to any bond sold before July 8, 1997.
[T.D. 8718, 62 FR 25506, May 9, 1997]