Name: Shawn Glacken

Title: Senior VP, Environmental Services

Company: Luminant

Sign Date: 9/2/2010

Name: Mike Hutcherson

Title: Project Manager

Company: METCO Environmental

Sign Date: 8/20/2010

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 1 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Facility Information:

Oak Grove Steam Electric Station

8127 Oak Grove Road

Franklin TX 77856

Contact: Craig Birkenfeld

Phone: 214-875-8326

Fax: 214-875-8333

Email: craigbirkenfeld@luminant.com

Testing Company:

METCO Environmental

P.O. Box 598

Addison TX 75001

Contact:Mike Hutcherson-Project Manager

Phone: 972-931-7127

Fax: 972-931-8398

Email: mhutcherson@metcoenv.com

Air Permit Number:

6180

Permitted Source ID/Name:

E-OGU1 Unit 1 Boiler

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

8,970 MMBtu/hr

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: Target Process Test Rate

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

Tangential-fired boiler with low-NOx burners and overfire air burning lignite coal. SCR with anhydrous ammonia 

for NOx control, followed by Activated Carbon Injection for mercury control, then Baghouse for PM control, then 

wet Scrubber for SO2 control.

Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: 4839500008 FRS #: 110034504757

SCC / Description 10100302 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Lignite - Pulverized Coal: Dry 

Bottom, Tangential Fired 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Unit #1 Stack 391 0 0 0 1884 1236 4 6

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 120 0 Apx time; the actual 

time varied from run 

to run.

Unit #1 Stack

Total organic compounds 

(TOC) as Propane

Method 25A 3 120 0 Apx time; the actual 

time varied from run 

to run.

Unit #1 Stack

Unit #1 Stack Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 192 0

Unit #1 Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 192 0

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 2 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

See attached report.

Unit #1 Stack Cobalt Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Selenium Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Nickel Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Manganese Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Chromium Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Lead Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Phosphorus (yellow or white) Method 29 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Antimony Method 29 3 240 0

Inorganic (Aqueous) 

Condensible Part.

Unit #1 Stack Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0

Organic Condensible 

Particulate

Unit #1 Stack Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Total Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Filterable Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 240 0

Unit #1 Stack Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 240 0

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 3 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 10

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 25A

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 4 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/18/2010 5/19/2010 5/20/2010

Run Start Time 10:20:00 AM 8:05:00 

AM

8:12:00 AM

Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 11:51:00 

AM

11:44:00 AM

Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 137.264 131.545 135.165 134.658

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 23.02 22.74 23.26 23.007

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 22.29 21.85 21.85 21.997

Carbon Dioxide, % 13.4 15.2 15.1 14.567

Oxygen, % 6.2 4.5 4.5 5.067

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 144.00 143.00 143.00 143.333

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,809,520.2 1,772,578.2 1,809,463.9 1,797,187.43

3

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,733,150.9 2,671,613.7 2,728,147.9 2,710,970.83

3

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 95.9 94.5 95.2 95.200

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9860 9860 9860 9,860.000

Fw 11950 11950 11950 11,950.000

Fc 1910 1910 1910 1,910.000

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 5 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 29

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Run Time, minutes

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Fw

Fc

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 5/OTM-28

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Run Time, minutes

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Fw

Fc

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 6 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 6C

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 7E

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 7 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Emissions Summary

Location: Unit #1 Stack - Method 10

Compound: Carbon Monoxide

Average

Run 1 2 3

lb/mmBtuO2 1.22E-01 8.69E-02 1.02E-01 0.104

ppm 1.35E+02 9.55E+01 1.13E+02 114.500

ppm@7%O2 1.14E+02 8.06E+01 9.51E+01 96.567

Location: Unit #1 Stack - Method 25A

Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) as 

Average

Run 1 2 3

lb/mmBtuO2 1.77E-05 1.78E-05 2.18E-03 0.001

ppm 1.24E-02 1.24E-02 1.53E+00 0.518

ppm@7%O2 1.04E-02 1.05E-02 1.29E+00 0.437

Location: Unit #1 Stack - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.419 0.872 0.404 0.565

lb/mmBtuO2 9.43E-05 1.84E-04 8.28E-05 0.000

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.429 0.47 0.414 0.438

lb/mmBtuO2 9.66E-05 9.90E-05 8.48E-05 0.000

Location: Unit #1 Stack - Method 29

Compound: Antimony

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0083 0.0039 0.0069 0.006

lb/mmBtuO2 2.11E-06 6.55E-07 1.14E-06 0.000

Compound: Arsenic

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00174 0.00174 0.0012 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 4.42E-07 2.92E-07 1.98E-07 0.000

Compound: Beryllium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001

lb/mmBtuO2 2.54E-07 1.68E-07 1.65E-07 0.000

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 8 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Compound: Cadmium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 3.81E-07 2.52E-07 2.48E-07 0.000

Compound: Chromium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.03324 0.02099 0.00061 0.018

lb/mmBtuO2 8.44E-06 3.53E-06 1.01E-07 0.000

Compound: Cobalt

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0088 0.0064 0.01 0.008

lb/mmBtuO2 2.23E-06 1.08E-06 1.65E-06 0.000

Compound: Lead

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.00238 0.00237 0.00257 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 6.04E-07 3.98E-07 4.25E-07 0.000

Compound: Manganese

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.01399 0.01099 0.0021 0.009

lb/mmBtuO2 3.55E-06 1.85E-06 3.47E-07 0.000

Compound: Nickel

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0756 0.0255 0.00182 0.034

lb/mmBtuO2 1.92E-05 4.28E-06 3.01E-07 0.000

Compound: Phosphorus (yellow or white)

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.04699 0.06114 0.02983 0.046

lb/mmBtuO2 1.19E-05 1.03E-05 4.93E-06 0.000

Compound: Selenium

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.0219 0.0291 0.0386 0.030

lb/mmBtuO2 5.56E-06 4.89E-06 6.38E-06 0.000

Location: Unit #1 Stack - Method 5/OTM-28

Compound: Filterable Particulate

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 74.3 41.4 29.6 48.433

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 9 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Process Run Data

Elb/hr 1.07E+02 5.86E+01 4.16E+01 69.067

gr/dscf 6.75E-03 3.84E-03 2.71E-03 0.004

lb/mmBtuO2 1.35E-02 6.90E-03 4.86E-03 0.008

Compound: Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Pa

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 32.7 39.6 6.3 26.200

Elb/hr 4.73E+01 5.61E+01 8.86E+00 37.420

gr/dscf 2.97E-03 3.68E-03 5.77E-04 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 5.95E-03 6.60E-03 1.04E-03 0.005

Compound: Organic Condensible Particulate

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 2.3 2.5 49.7 18.167

Elb/hr 3.33E+00 3.54E+00 6.99E+01 25.590

gr/dscf 2.09E-04 2.32E-04 4.55E-03 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 4.19E-04 4.17E-04 8.17E-03 0.003

Compound: Total Particulate

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 107.3 81.5 54 80.933

Elb/hr 1.55E+02 1.15E+02 7.60E+01 115.333

gr/dscf 9.75E-03 7.57E-03 4.94E-03 0.007

lb/mmBtuO2 1.95E-02 1.36E-02 8.87E-03 0.014

Location: Unit #1 Stack - Method 6C

Compound: Sulfur Dioxide

Average

Run 1 2 3

lb/mmBtuO2 2.46E-02 7.03E-02 7.41E-02 0.056

ppm 1.05E+01 3.37E+01 3.55E+01 26.567

ppm@7%O2 9.94E+00 2.85E+01 3.01E+01 22.847

Location: Unit #1 Stack - Method 7E

Compound: Nitrogen oxides (NOx)

Average

Run 1 2 3

lb/mmBtuO2 6.91E-02 6.30E-02 6.01E-02 0.064

ppm 4.13E+01 4.21E+01 4.01E+01 41.167

ppm@7%O2 3.91E+01 3.56E+01 3.40E+01 36.233

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 10 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Heat Input 8618 MMBtu/hr

2 Heat Input 8556 MMBtu/hr

3 Heat Input 8693 MMBtu/hr

1 Steam Output 5918 KPPH

2 Steam Output 5822 KPPH

3 Steam Output 5858 KPPH

1 Coal Feed Rate 553 tons/hour

2 Coal Feed Rate 560 tons/hour

3 Coal Feed Rate 568 tons/hour

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

4 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - 1A

308 PPH

5 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - 1A

308 PPH

6 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - 1A

312 PPH

4 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - 1B

306 PPH

5 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - 1B

272 PPH

6 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC 

REDUCTION) - 1B

289 PPH

4 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 397 PPH

5 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 279 PPH

6 ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION 367 PPH

4 BAGHOUSE A PRESSURE DROP 8.1 "H2O

5 BAGHOUSE A PRESSURE DROP 8.3 "H2O

6 BAGHOUSE A PRESSURE DROP 8.4 "H2O

4 BAGHOUSE B PRESSURE DROP 8.6 "H2O

5 BAGHOUSE B PRESSURE DROP 8.5 "H2O

6 BAGHOUSE B PRESSURE DROP 8.6 "H2O

4 Wet Scrubber (Average Absorber Bleed PH) 6 PH

5 Wet Scrubber (Average Absorber Bleed PH) 5.9 PH

6 Wet Scrubber (Average Absorber Bleed PH) 5.9 PH

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 11 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Process Lab Run Data

4 Wet Scrubber (Limestone Slurry Injection Rate) 271 GPM

5 Wet Scrubber (Limestone Slurry Injection Rate) 269 GPM

6 Wet Scrubber (Limestone Slurry Injection Rate) 246 GPM

Run Name Value UOM Comments

1 Fuel (Coal) Heating Value 10292Btu/lb (dry)

2 Fuel (Coal) Heating Value 9402 Btu/lb (dry)

3 Fuel (Coal) Heating Value 10023Btu/lb (dry)

1 Fuel Moisture 31.58 %

2 Fuel Moisture 31.19 %

3 Fuel Moisture 31.69 %

1 Fuel Ash Content 19.72 % dry

2 Fuel Ash Content 25.42 % dry

3 Fuel Ash Content 21.47 % dry

1 Volatile Matter 43.36 % dry

2 Volatile Matter 41.8 % dry

3 Volatile Matter 42.97 % dry

1 Fixed Carbon 36.92 % dry

2 Fixed Carbon 32.78 % dry

3 Fixed Carbon 35.56 % dry

1 Carbon 57.22 % dry

2 Carbon 53.68 % dry

3 Carbon 57.41 % dry

1 Sulfur 1.24 % dry

2 Sulfur 1.26 % dry

3 Sulfur 1.3 % dry

1 Hydrogen 4.41 % dry

2 Hydrogen 4.24 % dry

3 Hydrogen 4.56 % dry

1 Nitrogen 1.02 % dry

2 Nitrogen 0.96 % dry

3 Nitrogen 1.03 % dry

1 Oxygen 16.39 % dry

2 Oxygen 14.44 % dry

3 Oxygen 14.23 % dry

1 Antimony 1 dry ug/g

2 Antimony 1 dry ug/g

3 Antimony 1 dry ug/g

1 Arsenic 1 dry ug/g

2 Arsenic 1 dry ug/g

3 Arsenic 2 dry ug/g

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 12 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

1 Beryllium 0.6 dry ug/g

2 Beryllium 0.4 dry ug/g

3 Beryllium 0.9 dry ug/g

1 Cadmium 0.2 dry ug/g

2 Cadmium 0.2 dry ug/g

3 Cadmium 0.2 dry ug/g

1 Chromium 10 dry ug/g

2 Chromium 6 dry ug/g

3 Chromium 15 dry ug/g

1 Cobalt 2 dry ug/g

2 Cobalt 1 dry ug/g

3 Cobalt 2 dry ug/g

1 Lead 5 dry ug/g

2 Lead 3 dry ug/g

3 Lead 7 dry ug/g

1 Manganese 75 dry ug/g

2 Manganese 49 dry ug/g

3 Manganese 116 dry ug/g

1 Nickel 8 dry ug/g

2 Nickel 3 dry ug/g

3 Nickel 9 dry ug/g

1 Mercury 0.19 dry ug/g

2 Mercury 0.22 dry ug/g

3 Mercury 0.22 dry ug/g

1 Selenium 6 dry ug/g

2 Selenium 7 dry ug/g

3 Selenium 6 dry ug/g

1 Total Chlorine 100 dry ug/g

2 Total Chlorine 130 dry ug/g

3 Total Chlorine 120 dry ug/g

1 Total Fluorine 67 dry ug/g

2 Total Fluorine 110 dry ug/g

3 Total Fluorine 74 dry ug/g

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 13 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 10

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 14 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 25A

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 15 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 5/18/2010 5/19/2010 5/20/2010

Run Start Time 10:20:00 AM 8:05:00 AM 8:12:00 AM

Run Finish Time 1:52:00 PM 11:51:00 AM 11:44:00 AM

Net Traversing Points 48 48 48

Net Run Time, minutes 192 192 192

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.251 0.25 0.25 0.250

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.825 0.825 0.825 0.825

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.003 1.003 1.003 1.003

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.23 29.08 29.07 29.127

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.84 1.63 1.79 1.753

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 145.914 139.927 144.336 143.392

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 92.52 89.77 91.94 91.410

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 137.264 131.545 135.165 134.658

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 871.8 822.4 870.2 854.800

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 41.04 38.71 40.96 40.237

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 23.02 22.74 23.26 23.007

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 22.29 21.85 21.85 21.997

Dry Mole Fraction 0.7771 0.7815 0.7815 0.780

Carbon Dioxide, % 13.4 15.2 15.1 14.567

Oxygen, % 6.2 4.5 4.5 5.067

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.4 80.3 80.4 80.367

Fuel Factor 1.10 1.08 1.09

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.39 30.61 30.60 30.533

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 27.76 28.01 28.10 27.957

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.9 -0.9 -0.9 -0.900

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.16 29.01 29.00 29.057

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 144.00 143.00 143.00 143.333

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.8040804129

73623

0.772395648

267707

0.807899867

642307

0.795

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 54.63 53.40 54.53 54.187

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 833.837 833.837 833.837 833.837

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,809,520.2 1,772,578.2 1,809,463.9 1,797,187.4

33

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,733,150.9 2,671,613.7 2,728,147.9 2,710,970.8

33

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 95.9 94.5 95.2 95.200

Percent Excess Air, % 41.3 26.9 26.9 31.700

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9860 9860 9860 9,860.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 391 391 391

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 11950 11950 11950 11,950.000

Fc 1910 1910 1910 1,910.000

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 16 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 29

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Traversing Points

Net Run Time, minutes

Nozzle Diameter, inches

Pitot Tube Coefficient

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Dry Mole Fraction

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

Percent Excess Air, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Round Duct Diameter, inches

Rectangular Duct Width, inches

Rectangular Duct Length, inches

Fw

Fc

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 17 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 5/OTM-28

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Traversing Points

Net Run Time, minutes

Nozzle Diameter, inches

Pitot Tube Coefficient

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Dry Mole Fraction

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

Percent Excess Air, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Round Duct Diameter, inches

Rectangular Duct Width, inches

Rectangular Duct Length, inches

Fw

Fc

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 18 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 6C

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 19 of 20
Luminant, Oak Grove Unit 1, Franklin, TX

9/2/2010

Location Unit #1 Stack - Method 7E

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Monday, January 31, 2011 Page 20 of 20