alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Corixa Corporation

        We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
the Registration Statement (Form S-3) and related Prospectus of Corixa
Corporation for the registration of 170,224 shares of its common stock and to
the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 3, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Corixa Corporation
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                        Ernst & Young LLP

Seattle, Washington

August 9, 1999


                                      II-7
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title: Culturallandscape report for Martin Van Buren National Historic Site
 
Vol. 1| Vol. 2
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.86/4:M 36/V.1-2
Item Number:0646-N-03 (online)
CGP System Number001019335:
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 30, 2017********
July 23, 2015

Mr. Dewey Gray

LV Aerial Imaging

9724 Royal Lamb Drive

Las Vegas, NV 89145

Dear Mr. Gray:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 47.3, 61.5, 91.119, 91.151, and 91.205 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request on behalf of LV Aerial Imaging into the 

public docket (No. FAA−2015−1759), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have. 

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions, you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3415 *Pseudomonas* spp. serological reagents. ( a ) *Identification. Pseudomonas* spp. serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera, including antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents), used to identify *Pseudomonas* spp. from clinical specimens or from cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus *Pseudomonas. Pseudomonas aeruginosa* is a major cause of hospital-acquired infections, and has been associated with urinary tract infections, eye infections, burn and wound infections, blood poisoning, abscesses, and meningitis (inflammation of brain membranes). *Pseudomonas pseudomallei* causes melioidosis, a chronic pneumonia.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 63 FR 59227, Nov. 3, 1998]
38982.

#### FOWLER v. SOUTHERN WIRE & IRON, INC., *et al.*

Decide April 6, 1962.

*Poole, Pearce & Hall, Edwin Pearce, John S. Patton, Martin H. Rubin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Smith, Field, Ringel, Martin ■& Carr, Palmer H. Ansley, John L. Westmoreland, Jr.,*contra.

Per Curiam.

The judgment of this Court in *Fowler v. Southern Wire & Iron, Inc.,*104 Ga. App. 401 (122 SE2d 157) having been reversed by the Supreme Court of Georgia in *Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. Fowler,*217 Ga. 727 (124 SE2d 738), the judgment of this court is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

*The judgment oj the trial court is affirmed.*

*Felton, C. J., Bell, and Hall, JJ., concur.*
§ 884.5960 Genital vibrator for therapeutic use. ( a ) *Identification.* A genital vibrator for therapeutic use is an electrically operated device intended and labeled for therapeutic use in the treatment of sexual dysfunction or as an adjunct to Kegel's exercise (tightening of the muscles of the pelvic floor to increase muscle tone).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in part 807, subpart E, of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
[45 FR 12684, Feb. 26, 1980, as amended at 83 FR 29215, June 5, 2018]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Served: March 19 , 2015

NOTICE

When the Department grants statements of authorization permitting foreign air carriers to display the codes of U.S. air carrier partners , it includes a standard condition that states:

Notwithstanding any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our approval here is expressly conditioned upon the requi rement that the operating carrier shall not permit the code of its U.S. code

- sharing partner to be carried on any flight that enters, departs, or transits the airspace of any area for whose airspace the Federal Aviation Administration has issued a flight p rohibition.

Since February 15, 1995 (Order 95

- 2

- 34) t his requirement has been applicable to all

then

- existing and future statements of authorization authorizing foreign air carriers to

conduct code

- sharing operations in which a U.S. carrier’s code is car ried on a foreign

carrier’s aircraft

.

We have received a communication from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) stating that, g iven the growing concerns about regional conflict zones around the world

, and in conjunction with the ongoing work of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Task Force on Regional Conflict Zones and the recent High Level Safety Conference in Montreal, the FAA wants to ensure that carriers are reminded of the

above condition

, and t he FAA r equests that we issue a Notice to that effect.

We expressly remind carriers of the above condition. We also remind them that failure to

adhere to conditions attached to their statements of authorization renders them liable to

enforcement action by the De partment’s Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings. Should we receive information indicating that a carrier holding a statement

of authorization has failed to adhere to th e condition

, we will promptly forward that

information to the Office of Aviat ion Enforcement and Proceedings for appropriate

action.

While the above

- quoted condition attaches to authorizations granted to foreign air carriers, we expect the U.S.

- code

- share partners of foreign air carriers to monitor their partners’ operations to en sure compliance with the above

- quoted condition.2 The Department will serve this Notice by electronic mail on certificated U.S. carriers

, licensed foreign air carriers , the U.S. Department of State (Office of Aviation Negotiations), and the Federal Aviation Administration

.

By:

PAUL L. GRETCH Director, Office of International Aviation (SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.regulations.gov
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Termination of Federal advisory committee.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, (5 U.S.C. Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and title 41 of the CFR, the Department of Defense gives notice that it is terminating the charter for the U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System Comprehensive Review Committee.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jim Freeman, Deputy Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-601-6128.

      ( print page 11137)    
Dated: March 4, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-5098 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
# C_2014245EN.01002102.xml

| 28.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/21

---

Action brought on 28 April 2014 — Cyprus v OHIM (HALLOUMI)

(Case T-293/14)

2014/C 245/29

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 February 2014 given in Case R 1503/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 February 2014 given in Case R 1503/2013-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘HALLOUMI’ for goods in Class 29 — Community trade mark application No 11 570 124

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application in its entirety

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and (b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
APPROPRIATION FOR. HIGH SCHOOLS BY TOWNSHIP BOARDS.

Circuit Court of Hamilton County.

#### State, ex rel North Bond Village School District, v. Mt. Nebo Special School District et al.*

Decided, February 5, 1907.

*Schools*— Township *Board May he Compelled to Make Appropriation for High School*— Limit *of School Levy.*

1. A township board of education may, under Section 4009-15, Revised Statutes, which provides for the establishment and maintenance of joint township high schools, be compelled to appropriate its proportionate share of expense of the maintenance of such school from the tuition or contingent fund provided for by such section; but it can not be compelled to make the appropriation from a levy made for a subsequent year.

2. The levy, under Section 3959, Revised Statutes, for all school purposes, is limited to twelve mills, and if the estimate and certificate of the board of education is insufficient the remedy is by application to the county commissioners under Section 3969.

*424
      *Louis A. Ireton,*W. R. *Collins, W. M. Schoenle*and *G. T. Poor,*for plaintiff.

*H. J. Buntin,*contra.

Gifeen, J.; Swing, J., and Jelke, J., concur.

Affirmed by the Supreme Court without opinion, *State, ex rel,*v. *Mt. Nebo Special School District,*76 Ohio State, 637.

We find no constitutional or other infirmity in Section 4009-15, Revised Statutes, which provides that:

> “The funds for the maintenance and support of such high school be provided by appropriation from the tuition or contingent funds; or both, of each district, in propertion to the total valuation of property in the respective districts, the same to be placed in a separate fund in the treasury of the board of education having control of the school * * ***but only for the purposes of maintaining said school.”

Hence it was the duty of the board of education of the defendant school district, if it had sufficient' funds in the treasury during the year ending September, 1906, to appropriate from the tuition or contingent funds, or both, its proportionate share for the maintenance of such school; but it can not be compelled to appropriate the same from funds derived from the levy made for subsequent year, unless it can be done without impairing the general school fund or the efficiency of the common schools.

The levy for all school purposes is limited by Section 3959, Revised Statutes, to twelve mills on the dollar of valuation of taxable property of district, and if the board of education failed to estimate and certify a sufficient amount within the limit, the remedy was an application to the county commissioners under Section 3969, Revised Statutes.

Upon the facts in this case, we think the relator not entitled to a writ of mandamus, and the petition will'be dismissed.
<Page>


                                                                          [LOGO]

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 25 to Registration
Statement No. 033-19421 of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D
of our report dated February 28, 2003, relating to the financial statements of
Fortis Benefits Insurance Company Variable Account D, appearing in the
Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public
Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
#### § 1.211-1 Allowance of deductions.

In computing taxable income under section 63(a), the deductions provided by sections 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, and 217 shall be allowed subject to the exceptions provided in Part IX, Subchapter B, Chapter 1 of the Code (section 261 and following, relating to items not deductible).

[T.D. 6796, 30 FR 1037, Feb. 2, 1965]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Summary report on federallaboratory technology transfer [electronic resource]: agency approaches: ...activity metrics and outcomes.**
 
2001 | 2003
 
SuDoc Number:C 1.98/2:
Item Number:0128-V-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000821453
 
August 26, 2019
§ 884.6150 Assisted reproduction micromanipulators and microinjectors. ( a ) *Identification.* Assisted reproduction micromanipulators are devices intended to control the position of an assisted reproduction microtool. Assisted reproduction microinjectors are any device intended to control aspiration or expulsion of the contents of an assisted reproduction microtool.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls) (design specifications, labeling requirements, and clinical testing). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
[45 FR 12684, Feb. 26, 1980, as amended at 84 FR 71816, Dec. 30, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8057 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.8057

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, as the ``Little Saigon 
              Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LITTLE SAIGON VIETNAM WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Little Saigon Vietnam War Veterans Memorial 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Little 
Saigon Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
1997AnnualPM2.5NAAQSMaximumQuarterlyValueDataSubstitutionTestAverage2011 2012 2013NumberObs2011 2012 2013Completeness2011 2012 20132011‐2013DV AQSCheckQ1 9.6 9.9 11.2 Q1 26 28 28 Q1 87 90 93 11.5 OKQ2 10.2 11.2 10.9 Q2 29 27 31 Q2 97 90 100Q3 12.9 12.1 10.4 Q3 31 22 27 Q3 100 71 90Q4 14.4 12.3 12.6 Q4 26 27 31 Q4 87 90 100AnnualAverage11.8 11.4 11.3AnnualCount112 104 117Average2011 2012 2013NumberObs2011 2012 2013Completeness2011 2012 20132011‐2013DV TDVPASSQ1 9.6 9.9 11.2 Q1 26.0 28.0 28.0 Q1 87 90 93 11.8PASSQ2 10.2 11.2 10.9 Q2 29.0 27.0 31.0 Q2 97 90 100Q3 12.916.210.4 Q3 31.031.027.0 Q3 10010090Q4 14.4 12.3 12.6 Q4 26.0 27.0 31.0 Q4 87 90 100AnnualAverage11.812.411.3AnnualCount112113117IncompleteQuarterMaxValueQ32011 25.02012 26.32013 18.2MaxQ32011‐201326.3

Riverside (Magnolia) DV Riverside (Magnolia) TDVAverage2011 2012 2013NumberObs2011 2012 2013Completeness2011 2012 20132011‐2013DV AQSCheckQ1 11.4 11.4 13.4 Q1 30 31 27 Q1 100 100 90 12.6 OKQ2 10.2 12.1 11.0 Q2 30 30 31 Q2 100 100 100Q3 13.9 13.0 10.6 Q3 31 31 29 Q3 100 100 97Q4 17.6 13.1 12.9 Q4 27 28 23 Q4 90 93 74AnnualAverage13.3 12.4 12.0AnnualCount118 120 110Average2011 2012 2013NumberObs2011 2012 2013Completeness2011 2012 20132011‐2013DV TDVPASSQ1 11.4 11.4 13.4 Q1 30.0 31.0 27.0 Q1 100 100 90 13.4PASSQ2 10.2 12.1 11.0 Q2 30.0 30.0 31.0 Q2 100 100 100Q3 13.9 13.0 10.6 Q3 31.0 31.0 29.0 Q3 100 100 97Q4 17.6 13.123.2Q4 27.0 28.031.0Q4 90 93100AnnualAverage13.3 12.414.6AnnualCount118 120118IncompleteQuarterMaxValueQ42011 52.92012 35.22013 49.3MaxQ42011‐201352.9

Ontario DV Ontario TDVAverage2011 2012 2013NumberObs2011 2012 2013Completeness2011 2012 20132011‐2013DV AQSCheckQ1 10.5 10.1 12.8 Q1 13 15 14 Q1 87 100 93 8.7 OKQ2 4.3 5.9 5.7 Q2 15 13 15 Q2 100 87 100Q3 5.2 5.1 5.5 Q3 12 10 14 Q3 75 63 93Q4 13.8 10.8 14.6 Q4 15 14 16 Q4 100 88 100AnnualAverage8.4 8.0 9.7AnnualCount55 52 59Average2011 2012 2013NumberObs2011 2012 2013Completeness2011 2012 20132011‐2013DV TDVPASSQ1 10.5 10.1 12.8 Q1 13.0 15.0 14.0 Q1 87 100 93 8.8PASSQ2 4.3 5.9 5.7 Q2 15.0 13.0 15.0 Q2 100 87 100Q3 5.27.05.5 Q3 12.016.014.0 Q3 7510093Q4 13.8 10.8 14.6 Q4 15.0 14.0 16.0 Q4 100 88 100AnnualAverage8.48.49.7AnnualCount555859IncompleteQuarterMaxValueQ32011 10.02012 8.02013 9.7MaxQ32011‐201310.0

Big Bear DV Big Bear TDVAverage2011 2012 2013NumberObs2011 2012 2013Completeness2011 2012 20132011‐2013DV AQSCheckQ1 9.5 11.1 11.5 Q1 29 27 28 Q1 97 87 93 11.8 OKQ2 12.1 12.2 11.6 Q2 29 28 27 Q2 97 93 87Q3 13.4 12.9 10.6 Q3 21 26 27 Q3 68 84 90Q4 14.0 10.9 12.0 Q4 22 26 28 Q4 73 87 90AnnualAverage12.2 11.8 11.4AnnualCount101 107 110Average2011 2012 2013NumberObs2011 2012 2013Completeness2011 2012 20132011‐2013DV TDVPASSQ1 9.5 11.1 11.5 Q1 29.0 27.0 28.0 Q1 97 87 93 13.5PASSQ2 12.1 12.2 11.6 Q2 29.0 28.0 27.0 Q2 97 93 87Q320.312.9 10.6 Q331.026.0 27.0 Q310084 90Q427.610.9 12.0 Q430.026.0 28.0 Q410087 90AnnualAverage17.411.8 11.4AnnualCount119107 110IncompleteQuarterMaxValueQ3 Q42011 26.6 65.02012 34.8 33.52013 23.7 55.3MaxQ3/Q42011‐201334.8 65.0

San Bernardino D V San Bernardino TDV
Exhibit 15.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-207355on Form F-3 of our
report dated 24 February 2016, relating to the 2015 consolidated financial statements (before retrospective adjustments to the financial statements and related disclosures discussed in Note 41) of Santander UK Group Holdings plc and
subsidiaries (not presented herein) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Santander UK Group Holdings plc for the year ended 31 December 2017.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE LLP      
|London, United Kingdom
|7 March, 2018