alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014395EN.01006101.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/61

---

Action brought on 21 September 2014 — Hamas v Council

(Case T-702/14)

(2014/C 395/74)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Hamas (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: L. Glock, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision 2014/483/CFSP of 22 July 2014 updating and amending the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision 2014/72/CFSP, in so far as it concerns Hamas (including Hamas-Izz-al-Din-al-Quassem); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision 2014/483/CFSP of 22 July 2014 updating and amending the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision 2014/72/CFSP, in so far as it concerns Hamas (including Hamas-Izz-al-Din-al-Quassem);

| — | annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 790/2014 of 22 July 2014 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combatting terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 125/2014, in so far as it concerns Hamas (including Hamas-Izz-al-Din-al-Quassem); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 790/2014 of 22 July 2014 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combatting terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 125/2014, in so far as it concerns Hamas (including Hamas-Izz-al-Din-al-Quassem);

| — | order the Council to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-531/11, Hamas v Council. (1)

---

(1)  OJ 2012, C 126, p. 18.

---
# C_2016156EN.01003801.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2016 — Zoofachhandel Züpke and Others v Commission

Zoofachhandel Züpke and Others

Commission

(Case T-817/14) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Health policy - Combating avian influenza - Prohibition of the importation of captured wild birds into the EU - Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 139/2013 - Sufficiently serious breach of rules of law conferring rights on individuals - Manifest and serious disregard for the limits of discretion - Proportionality - Duty of care - Articles 15 to 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights))

(2016/C 156/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Zoofachhandel Züpke GmbH (Wesel, Germany), Zoohaus Bürstadt, Helmut Ofenloch GmbH & Co. KG (Bürstadt, Germany), Zoofachgeschäft — Vogelgroßhandel Import-Export Heinz Marche (Heinsberg, Germany), Rita Bürgel (Uthleben, Germany), and Norbert Kass (Altenbeken, Germany) (represented by: C. Correll, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and H. Kranenborg, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants, from 1 January 2010, by reason of the adoption of the prohibition of the importation of captured wild birds into the European Union contained, first, in Commission Regulation (EC) No 318/2007 of 23 March 2007 laying down animal health conditions for imports of certain birds into the Community and the quarantine conditions thereof (OJ 2007 L 84, p. 7) and, subsequently, in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 139/2013 of 7 January 2013 laying down animal health conditions for imports of certain birds into the Union and the quarantine conditions thereof (OJ 2013 L 47, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Zoofachhandel Züpke GmbH, Zoohaus Bürstadt, Helmut Ofenloch GmbH & Co. KG, Zoofachgeschäft — Vogelgroßhandel Import-Export Heinz Marche, Ms Rita Bürgel and Mr Norbert Kass to pay their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zoofachhandel Züpke GmbH, Zoohaus Bürstadt, Helmut Ofenloch GmbH & Co. KG, Zoofachgeschäft — Vogelgroßhandel Import-Export Heinz Marche, Ms Rita Bürgel and Mr Norbert Kass to pay their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

1

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8111 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure the reliability 

of address information provided under the Medicaid program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2024 

Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS (for herself and Mr. CARTWRIGHT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure 

the reliability of address information provided under the 

Medicaid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Program Im5 provement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENSURING THE RELIABILITY OF ADDRESS INFOR7 MATION PROVIDED UNDER THE MEDICAID 

8 PROGRAM. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a) of the Social Se10 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8111 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (86), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (87), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (87) the fol6 lowing new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(88) beginning January 1, 2026, provide for a 

8 process to regularly obtain address information for 

9 individuals enrolled under such plan (or a waiver of 

10 such plan) from reliable data sources (as described 

11 in section 435.919 of title 42, Code of Federal Reg12 ulations (or a successor regulation)) and act on any 

13 changes to such an address based on such informa14 tion in accordance with such section (or successor 

15 regulation).’’. 

16 (b) ENSURING TRANSMISSION OF ADDRESS INFOR17 MATION FROM MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATIONS.—Sec18 tion 1932 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396u– 

19 2) is amended by adding at the end the following new sub20 section: 

21 ‘‘(j) TRANSMISSION OF ADDRESS INFORMATION.— 

22 Beginning January 1, 2026, each contract under a State 

23 plan with a managed care entity under section 1903(m) 

24 shall provide that the entity transmits to the State any 

25 address information for an individual enrolled with the enVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:10 May 13, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8111.IH H8111

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 8111 IH

1 tity that is provided to such entity directly from, or 

2 verified by such entity directly with, such individual.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tolit Zegar, Otherwise Called Tollat Zegar, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 52,285.

First District, First Division.

March 10, 1969.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of Cook County, of Chicago (Harold A. Cowen, Norman W. Fishman, and James J. Doherty, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appellant; John J. Stamos, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE MURPHY.

Not to be published in full.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

IRS redesignated the following sections to appear below the undesignated center heading “Regulations Applicable to Certain Bonds Sold Prior to July 8, 1997” and preceding the undesignated center heading “Deductions for Personal Exemptions.” See 62 FR 25507 and 25513, May 9, 1997 for the specific sections involved in the redesignation.

#### § 1.404(b)-1 Method of contribution, etc., having the effect of a plan; effect of section 404(b).

Section 404(a) is not confined to formal stock bonus, pension, profit- sharing, and annuity plans, or deferred compensation plans, but it includes any method of contributions or compensation having the effect of a stock bonus, pension, profit-sharing, or annuity plan, or similar plan deferring the receipt of compensation. Thus, where a corporation pays pensions to a retired employee or employees or to their beneficiaries in such amounts as may be determined from time to time by the board of directors or responsible officers of the company, or where a corporation is under an obligation, whether funded or unfunded, to pay a pension or other deferred compensation to an employee or his beneficiaries, there is a method having the effect of a plan deferring the receipt of compensation for which deductions are governed by section 404(a). If an employer on the accrual basis defers paying any compensation to an employee until a later year or years under an arrangement having the effect of a stock bonus, pension, profit-sharing, or annuity plan, or similar plan deferring the receipt of compensation, he shall not be allowed a deduction until the year in which the compensation is paid. This provision is not intended to cover the case where an employer on the accrual basis defers payment of compensation after the year of accrual merely because of inability to pay such compensation in the year of accrual, as, for example, where the funds of the company are not sufficient to enable payment of the compensation without jeopardizing the solvency of the company, or where the liability accrues in the earlier year, but the amount payable cannot be exactly determined until the later year.

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11690, Nov. 26, 1960]
Exhibit 34.3



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



| |  |                                                                                                                               
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Audit - Tax - Advisory
Grant Thornton LLP
1201 Walnut St, Suite 2200
Kansas City, Missouri 64106 T 816.412.2400
F 816.412.2404

Board of Directors

Situs
Holdings, LLC

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria (Managements Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items 1117, 1119, 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commissions Regulation AB included in Appendix A as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, with respect to the Companys Operating or Trust Advisor Services performed over the deals listed in Appendix B (the
Platform). Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test
basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Services and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination was not designed to detect material
noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Companys activities with respect to the Platform during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

Kansas City, Missouri

February 18, 2016
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.3910 Wheelchair accessory. ( a ) *Identification.* A wheelchair accessory is a device intended for medical purposes that is sold separately from a wheelchair and is intended to meet the specific needs of a patient who uses a wheelchair. Examples of wheelchair accessories include but are not limited to the following: armboard, lapboard, pusher cuff, crutch and cane holder, overhead suspension sling, head and trunk support, and blanket and leg rest strap.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). If the device is not intended for use as a protective restraint as defined in § 880.6760 of this chapter, it is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, regarding general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, regarding complaint files.
[61 FR 8439, Mar. 4, 1996, as amended at 66 FR 38817, July 25, 2001]
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fonix Corporation on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger D. Dudley, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











______________________________________________Roger
      D. DudleyPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, andChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer, Principal Accounting
Officer)


Dated
November 19, 2008





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1.1502-27 Consolidated section 247 deduction. ( a ) *Amount of deduction.* The consolidated section 247 deduction for the taxable year shall be an amount computed as follows: ( 1 ) First, determine the amount which is the lesser of: ( i ) The aggregate of the dividends paid (within the meaning of section 247(a)) during such year by members of the group which are public utilities (within the meaning of section 247(b)(1)) on preferred stock (within the meaning of section 247(b)(2)), other than dividends paid to other members of the group, or
( ii ) The aggregate of the taxable income (or loss) (as determined under paragraph (b) of this section) of each such member which is a public utility.
( 2 ) Then, multiply the amount determined under subparagraph (1) of this paragraph by the fraction specified in section 247(a)(2).
( b ) *Computation of taxable income.* For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, the taxable income (or loss) of a member of the group described in paragraph (a)(1)(i) shall be determined under § 1.1502-12, adjusted for the following items taken into account in the computation of consolidated taxable income: ( 1 ) The portion of the consolidated net operating loss deduction, the consolidated charitable contributions deduction, and the consolidated dividends received deduction, attributable to such member;
( 2 ) Such member's capital gain net income (net capital gain for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1977) (determined without regard to any net capital loss carryover or carryback attributable to such member);
( 3 ) Such member's net capital loss and section 1231 net loss, reduced by the portion of the consolidated net capital loss attributable to such member; and
( 4 ) The portion of any consolidated net capital loss carryover or carryback attributable to such member which is absorbed in the taxable year.
[T.D. 6894, 31 FR 11794, Sept. 8, 1966, as amended by T.D. 7728, 45 FR 72650, Nov. 3, 1980]
1 

### L EVI N

, N A NCY

F r om: T ae j oo S h i n < T S h i n @ a z m ag.go v>

S e nt: Fr i da y , Ma rc h 13, 2015 10:31 AM

T o: L EV IN, N A NCY

Cc: L i nd y B aue r ; Matthe w P oppen; Cath y A r thur

S ub jec t: 2011 Ei ght

- Hou r O z one Nonatta i n m ent E m i ss i on s In v ento ry

D e ar N a n c y ;

M a t t f o r w ar d e d t o m e y o u r m e ssa g e i nqu iri ng t h e s p e cific m o n t h f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e 2 0 1 1 O n r o a d M o b il e

S o u rc e P e r i o d ic E m i s si o n s I n v e n t o r y ( P E I ) f o r o z o n e p r e c u rs o rs

. T h e 2 0 11 O n r o a d M o b i l e S o u r c e P E I a nd d o c u m e n t s

we r e d e v e l o p e d i n 2 0 1 2

. T h e M O V E S 2 0 1 0 b i npu t fil e s u s e d i n t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e 2 0 1 1 O n r o a d M o b il e S o u rc e P E I

we r e s ub m i t te d t o t h e U .S

. E P A N a t i o n al E m i s si o n s I n v e n t o r y ( N E I ) d a t a b as e i n D e c e m b e r 20 12

. T h e 2 0 1 1 O n r o a d

M o b il e S o u r c e P E I a nd d o c u m e n t s we r e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e M a ric o p a C o un t y A ir Q u ali ty D e p ar t m e n t i n D e c e m b e r 2 0 12

.

P l e a s e l e t m e k n o w if y o u h a v e a n y f u r t h e r qu e s t i o n s o n t h e 20 11 O n r o a d M o b il e S o u rc e P E I

.

T h a n k y o u v e r y m u c h.

T a ej oo S h i n

, P h. D

.

3 0 2 No r t h 1 st A ve

. , S t e

. 3 00

P ho e n ix, A r i

zona 8 5 0 03

www .az m ag.gov

( 6 0 2 ) 2 5 4

- 6 3 00
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act May 9, 2005 Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549 Ladies and Gentlemen: The certifications set forth below are being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Report) of Zix Corporation for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Richard D. Spurr, the chief executive officer, and Bradley C. Almond, the chief financial officer of Zix
Corporation, each certifies that to the best of his knowledge and in their respective capacities as officers of Zix Corporation: 1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Zix Corporation as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. /s/ Richard D. SpurrName:
    
    Richard D. SpurrTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer, Presidentand Chief Operating Officer/s/ Bradley C. AlmondName:
    
    Bradley C. AlmondTitle:
    
    Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 80 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 80

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE HOUSE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 1993

       Referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate the week of April 17-24, 1994, as ``Nancy Moore Thurmond 
           National Organ and Tissue Donor Awareness Week''.

Whereas Nancy Moore Thurmond was suddenly taken from us in the prime of her 
        life;
Whereas in an attempt to honor those causes for which Nancy Moore Thurmond was 
        associated, namely the championing of children's causes;
Whereas a new patient is added to the national patient waiting list for an organ 
        transplant every 20 minutes;
Whereas thousands of lives are saved or significantly improved annually by organ 
        and tissue transplantation; and
Whereas increasing the number of organs which can be transplanted as well as 
        tissues would save American taxpayers millions of dollars: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the week of April 17-24, 
1994, is designated ``Nancy Moore Thurmond National Organ and Tissue 
Donor Awareness Week'' and the President is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to 
observe such week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and 
activities.

            Passed the Senate April 19, 1993.

            Attest:

                                             WALTER J. STEWART,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) or RULE 15d-14(b)
AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 
OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Williams Controls, Inc (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Patrick W. Cavanagh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
 Company.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ PATRICK W. CAVANAGH | 
|                        | 
|Patrick W. Cavanagh     | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|Williams Controls, Inc. | 
|August 9, 2010          | 

---