alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, A Dvision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Trust Advisor, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C24 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.                                                                                                                                                                         (logo) Together we’ll go far
EXHIBIT 1

Huang + Menders Photography

Inspire 1 Preflight Checklist

Before Energizing System

1. Arms up and locked in flight position

2. Props installed on correct motors

3. Props tightened and locks in place

4. Props clean and undamaged

5. Motors turn smoothly

6. Battery secure

7. Wiring in good condition

8. Flight control system connections secure

9. Transmitter on

b. Transmitter battery level > flight minimum

10. Ground Control Station (GCS) on

a. Waypoints loaded, as appropriate

b. Waypoints in clear airspace, according to UAS flight rules

11. Flight battery voltage >= 90% maximum pack voltage

a. >= 22.7V for 6S LiPo flight pack

12. Weather forecast

a. VMC for duration of planned flight + 30 minutes

b. Winds < 15 kts steady, 25 kts gust

Energize System

13. Power system on

14. Monitor for correct startup sequence

15. On GCS:

a. Communications link established

b. GPS positioning locked

c. Accelerometers calibrated

d. Compass calibrated

e. Transmitter control direction correct

f. Altitude limitation set

g. Distance limitation set

Starting Motors

16. Position UAS at launch location

17. Establish position as “home”

18. Reset flight timer

19. Verify desired flight control mode

20. Verify surroundings are clear

a. “Clear Props!”
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-11233 Summary Calendar

FRED L. MICHAELIS Petitioner - Appellant

v. BARBARA ROLLINS Respondent - Appellee

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Norther District of Texas, Abilene

(1:99-CV-187)

-------------------- April 7, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam 1 : IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal is DENIED. The judgment of the district court dismissing for want of jurisdiction is AFFIRMED.
# C_2014380EN.01002001.xml

| 27.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/20

---

Action brought on 2 September 2014 — Infusion Brands v OHIM (DUALTOOLS)

(Case T-648/14)

2014/C 380/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Infusion Brands, Inc. (Myer Lake Circle Clearwater, United States) (represented by: K. Piepenbrink, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 July 2014 given in Case R 398/2014-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 July 2014 given in Case R 398/2014-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in white, black and green containing the verbal element ‘DUALTOOLS’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 8 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 1 2 0 27  496

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Partially rejected the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), (c) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
MT BART-eligible facility list ASARCO Inc. - EastHelena - 2557 ColumbiaFalls Aluminum - 2655 PPL MT - Corette Plant - 2953 PPL MT Colstrip Units 1& 2 - 0513 Ho1cim US-Trident Plant - 0982 Ash Grove Cement- MT City - 2005 Cenex - Laurel Refinery - 1821 Exxon USA - Billings Refinery - 1564 MT Sulphur & Chemical - 2611 Smurfit Stone - MissoulaMill - 2589
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.5650 Topical oxygen chamber for extremities. ( a ) *Identification.* A topical oxygen chamber for extremities is a device that is intended to surround a patient's limb and apply humidified oxygen topically at a pressure slightly greater than atmospheric pressure to aid healing of chronic skin ulcers such as bedsores.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance: Topical Oxygen Chamber for Extremities.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
[76 FR 22807, Apr. 25, 2011]
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.3300 Absorbable implant (scleral buckling method). ( a ) *Identification.* An absorbable implant (scleral buckling method) is a device intended to be implanted on the sclera to aid retinal reattachment.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4618]

[[Page 10245]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-735-000]

S.J. Energy Partners, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

February 26, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
S.J. Energy Partners, Inc.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail [email protected] or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4618 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.5170 Powered flotation therapy bed. ( a ) *Identification.* A powered flotation therapy bed is a device that is equipped with a mattress that contains a large volume of constantly moving water, air, mud, or sand. It is intended for medical purposes to treat or prevent a patient's bedsores, to treat severe or extensive burns, or to aid circulation. The mattress may be electrically heated.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 890.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 59231, Nov. 3, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4630 Ultraviolet lamp for dermatologic disorders. ( a ) *Identification.* An ultraviolet lamp for dermatologic disorders is a device (including a fixture) intended to provide ultraviolet radiation of the body to photoactivate a drug in the treatment of a dermatologic disorder if the labeling of the drug intended for use with the device bears adequate directions for the device's use with that drug.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6332

WILLIAM IRVIN MARABLE, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEWIS W. BARLOW; JAMES W. GARNETT; D. TYSON,

Medical; MRS. WINN, Medical,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-209-A)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 6, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Irvin Marable, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Irvin Marable, Sr., filed an untimely notice of

appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for

filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These

periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director,

Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United

States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil

actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court

notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the

district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on July 11, 1997;

Marable’s notice of appeal was filed on February 10, 1998, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Marable’s failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Marable’s

appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2015065EN.01005001.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/50

---

Action brought on 23 December 2014 — International Gaming Projects v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting Group (Sky BONUS)

(Case T-840/14)

(2015/C 065/67)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International Gaming Projects Ltd (Valletta, Malta) (represented by: M. Garayalde Niño, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Sky BONUS’ — Application for registration No 10 734 549

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 in Case R 2040/2013-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Partially annul the contested decision and grant registration of CTM application ‘Sky BONUS’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Partially annul the contested decision and grant registration of CTM application ‘Sky BONUS’;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(4) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(4) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3353 Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A1203) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
[54 FR 48239, Nov. 22, 1989; 54 FR 51342, Dec. 14, 1989]
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4440 Eye pad. ( a ) *Identification.* An eye pad is a device that consists of a pad made of various materials, such as gauze and cotton, intended for use as a bandage over the eye for protection or absorption of secretions.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 878.9.
[53 FR 23872, June 24, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 63010, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38803, July 25, 2001]
# C_2014194EN.01003301.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/33

---

Action brought on 22 April 2014 — Hansen v OHIM (WIN365)

(Case T-264/14)

2014/C 194/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Robert Hansen (Munich, Germany) (represented by M. Pütz-Poulalion, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 February 2014 in Case R 908/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 February 2014 in Case R 908/2013-4;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark WIN365 for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 36, 38 and 41 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 5 13  851

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration partially refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2014253EN.01006002.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/60

---

Action brought on 16 June 2014 — Metalúrgica Galaica v Commission

(Case T-442/14)

2014/C 253/82

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Metalúrgica Galaica, SA (Narón, A Coruña, Spain) (represented by: A. López Gómez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the decision categorising the measures which together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ (‘STLS’) as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the only beneficiaries of the alleged aid and, consequently, as solely liable for its recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities, in full or in such a way as to limit the bar on passing on the burden of recovery to the profitability of the operations; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities, in full or in such a way as to limit the bar on passing on the burden of recovery to the profitability of the operations; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera SA v Commission.

Duro Felguera SA

Commission

---
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.1 Scope. ( a ) This part sets forth the classification of general hospital and personal use devices intended for human use that are in commercial distribution.
( b ) The identification of a device in a regulation in this part is not a precise description of every device that is, or will be, subject to the regulation. A manufacturer who submits a premarket notification submission for a device under part 807 may not show merely that the device is accurately described by the section title and identification provisions of a regulation in this part, but shall state why the device is substantially equivalent to other devices, as required by § 807.87.
( c ) To avoid duplicative listings, a general hospital and personal use device that has two or more types of uses (e.g., used both as a diagnostic device and as a therapeutic device) is listed only in one subpart.
( d ) References in this part to regulatory sections of the Code of Federal Regulations are to chapter I of title 21, unless otherwise noted.
( e ) Guidance documents referenced in this part are available on the Internet at *http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm ..*
[52 FR 17738, May 11, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 71704, Dec. 8, 2004; 78 FR 18233, Mar. 26, 2013]