alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.52  


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE

MEDPARTNERS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN  


        Pursuant
to the powers of amendment reserved under Article Nine of the MedPartners, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan"), as restated effective November 11, 1998, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Care mark Rx, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows: 


1.



        Section 2.7
of the Plan shall be amended by replacing the phrase "MedPartners, Inc." with the phrase "Caremark Rx, Inc.". 


2. 


        Section 2.19
of the Plan shall be amended by replacing the definition of "Plan" with the following: 



"shall
mean the CareStock Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as constituted herein and as hereafter amended." 



3.



        The
Plan shall be further amended by replacing, in every instance where the former Plan name is referenced, such former Plan name in its entirety with the new Plan name as indicated
above. 


        The
effective date of this Amendment Number One shall be March 14,2000. 



	 	 	 	 	CAREMARK RX, INC.
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

/s/  KIRK MCCONNELL      

	

ATTEST:	
 	

/s/  AMY L. HOLLIMAN      
	
 	

Date:	
 	

March 24, 2003
Honorable Zollie Steakley Secretary of State Capitol Station Austin, Texas Opinion No. WW - 

### 562 Re: Authority of the Secretary of State to accept and file Articles of Incorporation which contain a stated purpose clause and related questions. Dear Mr. Steakley:

Youhave inquired concerning whether a charter should be,:filed containing the following purpose clause:

“To eel1 prearranged or prepaid funeral services or funeral merchandise (including caskets, grave vaults, and all other articles of merchandise incidental to a funeral service) in this state under a sales contract providing for prepaid burial or funeral benefits or merchandise to be’delivered at anundetermined future date dependent upon the death of the contracting party”

. I respectfully direct your attention to Opinion of Attorney General MannNo. 

### o-2736written by Ardell Williams. I think this opinion in its answer to the third question there discussed will resolve the problem with which you are concerned. As I understand your question, your office feels that you maybe precluded from filing this charter because the business described within the purpose clause mayfall within the purview of Article 

### 14.37of the Insurance Code, requiring burial associations to organize under Chapter 12of the Insurance Code andbe regulated under Chapter 14of that Code. Article 

### 14.37Is a codification of Section 2’3, Senate Bill 

### 135,Acte 

### 46thLegislature. The third question discussed in Opinion 

### o-2736concerns an activity which would be within the purview of the proposed purpose clause. That opinion holds that euch an activity is not governed by Section 23, Senate Bill 

### 135. However, you mustrequire the purpose clause to be amendedto add the following restrictive alnguaae:

“Provided however, that this corporation shall not engage in business a8 an insurance companyor a8 a burial association”

.Honorable Zollie Steakley, Page 2, NW-562)

The corporation must, however, comply with Article 

### 548.b, Vernon's Civil Statutee. Very truly youm, WILLWILSON Attorney General of Texas

Wallace P. Finfrock Aaeietant Attorney General WPF:aw APPROVED: OPINION

coMITJ!EE: Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairmen Marietta McGregorPayne Marvin Thomse REVIEWEDF~RT~~EAT~!ORNEY GENEBAL BY: W.V. Geppert
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,165,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,218,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   132,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,915,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,325,000
<PP&E>                                       1,755,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 843,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,783,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,001,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,351,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,783,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,518,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,003,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,303,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (798,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (798,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, 


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penn Treaty
American Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Mark Cloutier, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
          period ended September 30, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          Companys financial condition and results of operations.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                           |                                                                
|-------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    November 12, 2004 | /s/  Mark Cloutier                                             
|                           | Mark Cloutier
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7932 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7932

 To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to international 
  financial institutions for the purposes of financing foreign shrimp 
                     farms, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2024

Mr. Nehls (for himself, Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, Mr. Vicente Gonzalez 
of Texas, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Mr. Ezell, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Ms. 
 Mace, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Babin, Mr. Fry, Mrs. Luna, 
Ms. Letlow, and Mr. Bilirakis) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to international 
  financial institutions for the purposes of financing foreign shrimp 
                     farms, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Shrimpers Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON MAKING FEDERAL FUNDS AVAILABLE TO INTERNATIONAL 
              FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO FINANCE FOREIGN SHRIMP FARMS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall condition any provision of 
Federal funds to an international financial institution (as defined in 
section 1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act) on 
the requirement that the funds not be used to finance any activity 
relating to shrimp farming, shrimp processing, or the export of shrimp 
in any foreign country.

SEC. 3. ANNUAL GAO REPORT ON COMPLIANCE BY THE UNITED STATES EXECUTIVE 
              DIRECTORS AT CERTAIN INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 
              WITH INSTRUCTION TO OPPOSE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL 
              INSTITUTION ASSISTANCE FOR THE PRODUCTION OR EXTRACTION 
              OF EXPORT COMMODITIES OR MINERALS IN SURPLUS ON WORLD 
              MARKETS.

    Within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and 
annually thereafter, the Comptroller General shall investigate, and 
submit to the Congress a written report on, the extent to which the 
United States Executive Directors at the institutions specified in 
section 22 of the Export-Import Bank Act Amendments of 1986 have 
carried out the instructions described in such section.
                                 <all>
```
#### JULIAN E. WOODWELL v. THE UNITED STATES.

[41 C. Cls. R., 357; 214 U. S. R., 82.]

*On the claimant's Appeal.*

The claimant is inspector of electric-light plants in the Treasury ' Department, receiving a salary of $2,000 a year. Congress appropriates for installation of electric-light plants in the Interior Department. There being no person in that department competent, the Secretary of the Interior applies to the *598Secretary of tlie Treasury for such a person, who directs the claimant to render the required assistance. I-Ie accordingly proposes detailed plans and specifications and renders other services. All of his services are rendered out of his hours and in addition to his regular services in the Treasury Department.

The court below decides:

I. Though the services of an employee of the Treasury Department rendered for and in the Interior Department at the request of the Secretary thereof and by direction of the Secretary of the Treasury were valuable and beneficial to the Government and were performed out of hours and in addition to the full performance of his regular duties in the Treasury Department, yet they are prohibited by Revised -Statutes, §§ 1763, 1764, and 1765, and no recovery can be had for them.

II. The conditions under which an employee of the Government can recover additional compensation examined and stated.

The decision of the court below, is affirmed on the same grounds.

Mr. Justice White delivered tlie opinion of the Supreme Court May 17, 1909.
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4780 Powered suction pump. ( a ) *Identification.* A powered suction pump is a portable, AC-powered or compressed air-powered device intended to be used to remove infectious materials from wounds or fluids from a patient's airway or respiratory support system. The device may be used during surgery in the operating room or at the patient's bedside. The device may include a microbial filter.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of MicroTel International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities
as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 11, 2003                 By: /s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Carmine T. Oliva
                                            Chief Executive Officer (principal
                                            executive officer)

Dated: November 11, 2003                 By: /s/ RANDOLPH D. FOOTE
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Randolph D. Foote
                                            Chief Financial Officer (principal
                                            financial officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Wagner *v.*Aluminum Company of America

[No. 17,456.

Filed March 15, 1946.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1946. Transfer Denied May 20, 1946.]

*607
      *Ralph W. Scowder,*of Monticello, for appellant.

*Allison E. Stuart, Brenton A. Devol, Roger D. Branigan, Cable G. Ball,*and *Michael T. Ricks,*all of Lafayette, for appellee.

Royse, P. J.

This is an appeal from an award of the Full Industrial Board denying appellant workmen’s compensation. The Full Board found appellant did not sustain an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.

Under proper assignment of error here, appellant contends the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the award and it is therefore contrary to law.

While there is a conflict, there is ample evidence to sustain the finding of the Full Board that appellant is suffering from arthritis which was not caused by an accidental injury. Therefore, the award of the Full Industrial Board is not contrary to law and must be affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 65 N. E. (2d) 493.
# C_2016136EN.01004401.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/44

---

Order of the General Court of 2 March 2016 — Société générale v Commission

(Case T-98/14) (1)

1

(2016/C 136/60)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.3175 Flotation cushion. ( a ) *Identification.* A flotation cushion is a device intended for medical purposes that is made of plastic, rubber, or other type of covering, that is filled with water, air, gel, mud, or any other substance allowing a flotation media, used on a seat to lessen the likelihood of skin ulcers.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 1125, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38816, July 25, 2001]
§ 884.2720 External uterine contraction monitor and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* An external uterine contraction monitor (i.e., the tokodynamometer) is a device used to monitor the progress of labor. It measures the duration, frequency, and relative pressure of uterine contractions with a transducer strapped to the maternal abdomen. This generic type of device may include an external pressure transducer, support straps, and other patient and equipment supports.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
# C_2017213EN.01002501.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — Sotiropoulou and Others v Council

(Case T-531/14) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Economic and monetary policy - Decisions addressed to a Member State with a view to remedying an excessive deficit situation - Reduction in and withdrawal of pension rights in Greece - Sufficiently serious infringement of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals))

(2017/C 213/32)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Leïmonia Sotiropoulou (Patras, Greece) and the 63 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: K. Chrysogonos, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Gregorio Merino, E. Chatziioakeimidou and E. Dumitriu-Segnana, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-P. Keppenne and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the adoption of the decisions of the Council addressed to the Hellenic Republic in activation of the mechanism provided for in Article 126 TFEU.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Leïmonia Sotiropoulou and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Leïmonia Sotiropoulou and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.

1

---
§ 884.4520 Obstetric-gynecologic general manual instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* An obstetric-gynecologic general manual instrument is one of a group of devices used to perform simple obstetric and gynecologic manipulative functions. This generic type of device consists of the following: ( 1 ) An episiotomy scissors is a cutting instrument, with two opposed shearing blades, used for surgical incision of the vulvar orifice for obstetrical purposes.
( 2 ) A fiberoptic metal vaginal speculum is a metal instrument, with fiberoptic light, used to expose and illuminate the interior of the vagina.
( 3 ) A metal vaginal speculum is a metal instrument used to expose the interior of the vagina.
( 4 ) An umbilical scissors is a cutting instrument, with two opposed shearing blades, used to cut the umbilical cord.
( 5 ) A uterine clamp is an instrument used to hold the uterus by compression.
( 6 ) A uterine packer is an instrument used to introduce dressing into the uterus or vagina.
( 7 ) A vaginal applicator is an instrument used to insert medication into the vagina.
( 8 ) A vaginal retractor is an instrument used to maintain vaginal exposure by separating the edges of the vagina and holding back the tissue.
( 9 ) A gynecological fibroid hook is an instrument used to exert traction upon a fibroid.
( 10 ) A pelvimeter (external) is an instrument used to measure the external diameters of the pelvis.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The devices are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
[45 FR 12684, Feb. 26, 1980, as amended at 54 FR 25052, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38809, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.3115 2-[[2,5-Diethoxy-4-[(4-methylphenyl)thiol]phenyl]azo]-1,3,5-benzenetriol. ( a ) *Identity.* The color additive2-[[2,5-diethoxy-4-[(4-methylphenyl)thio]phenyl]azo]-1,3,5-benzenetriol is formed in situ in soft (hydrophilic) contact lenses.
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* The color additive 2-[[2,5-diethoxy-4-[(4-methylphenyl)thio]phenyl]azo]-1,3,5-benzenetriol may be safely used to mark soft (hydrophilic) contact lenses with the letter R or the letter L for identification purposes subject to the following restrictions: ( 1 ) The quantity of the color additive does not exceed 1.1 × 10−7 grams in a soft (hydrophilic) contact lens.
( 2 ) When used as specified in the labeling, there is no measurable migration of the color additive from the contact lens to the surrounding ocular tissue.
( 3 ) Authorization for this use shall not be construed as waiving any of the requirements of section 510(k) and 515 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the contact lens in which the color additive is used.
( c ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore the color additive is exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[48 FR 22706, May 20, 1983]
#### Howard W. Sessions *v.*Arthur S. Sachs et al.

*Howard W. Sessions,*pro se, on the motion.

Submitted December 17 —

decided December 17, 1968

The motion by the plaintiff to be permitted to present additional evidence in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.