alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# AGENCY:

United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Mint is announcing the price of the 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Two-Roll Set and the 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters 100-Coin Bags.

The 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Two-Roll Sets, featuring Hot Springs National Park, Yellowstone National Park, Yosemite National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, and Mount Hood National Forest, will be priced at $32.95 each. These sets will contain rolls of coins struck at both the United States Mint facilities at Philadelphia and Denver. The first set, featuring Hot Springs National Park, will be released on April 19, 2010.

The 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters 100-Coin Bags, also featuring Hot Springs National Park, Yellowstone National Park, Yosemite National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, and Mount Hood National Forest, will be priced at $35.95 each. Bags of coins from both the United States Mint facilities at Philadelphia and Denver will be available. The first bags, featuring Hot Springs National Park, will be released on April 19, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

B.B. Craig, Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street, NW.; Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701.

Dated: March 3, 2010.

Edmund C. Moy,

Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2010-4866 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cornerstone Realty Income Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2004 and for the period then ended.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT    
|Glade M. Knight        
|Chief Executive Officer



August 6, 2004
38976.

#### NeSMITH v. THE STATE.

Decided September 6, 1961

Rehearing denied September 28, 1961.

*H. Alonzo Woods,*for plaintiff in error.

*William M. West, Solicitor-General, Jack J. Gautier, Assistant Solicitor-General,*contra.

Frankum, Judge.

J. L. NeSmith was convicted of talcing indecent liberties with a female child ten years of age. His motion for a new trial, consisting of the usual general grounds, was denied, and he excepts to that judgment.

The evidence supports the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
§ 884.4050 Gynecologic laparoscopic power morcellation containment system. ( a ) *Identification.* A gynecologic laparoscopic power morcellation containment system is a prescription device consisting of an instrument port and tissue containment method that creates a working space allowing for direct visualization during a power morcellation procedure following a laparoscopic procedure for the excision of benign gynecologic tissue that is not suspected to contain malignancy.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
( 2 ) Device components that are labeled sterile must be validated to a sterility assurance level of 10−6;
( 3 ) Performance data must support shelf life by demonstrating continued sterility of the device or the sterile components, package integrity, and device functionality over the intended shelf life;
( 4 ) Non-clinical performance data must demonstrate that the device meets all design specifications and performance requirements. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Demonstration of the device impermeability to tissue, cells, and fluids;
( ii ) Demonstration that the device allows for the insertion and withdrawal of laparoscopic instruments while maintaining pneumoperitoneum;
( iii ) Demonstration that the containment system provides adequate space to perform morcellation and adequate visualization of the laparoscopic instruments and tissue specimen relative to the external viscera;
( iv ) Demonstration that intended laparoscopic instruments and morcellators do not compromise the integrity of the containment system; and
( v ) Demonstration that intended users can adequately deploy the device, morcellate a specimen without compromising the integrity of the device, and remove the device without spillage of contents;
( 5 ) Training must be developed and validated to ensure users can follow the instructions for use; and
( 6 ) Labeling must include the following: ( i ) A contraindication for use in gynecologic surgery in which the tissue to be morcellated is known or suspected to contain malignancy;
( ii ) Unless clinical performance data demonstrates that it can be removed or modified, a contraindication for removal of uterine tissue containing suspected fibroids in patients who are: Peri- or postmenopausal, or candidates for en bloc tissue removal, for example, through the vagina or via a mini-laparotomy incision;
( iii ) The following boxed warning: “Warning: Information regarding the potential risks of a procedure with this device should be shared with patients. Uterine tissue may contain unsuspected cancer. The use of laparoscopic power morcellators during fibroid surgery may spread cancer. The use of this containment system has not been clinically demonstrated to reduce this risk.”
( iv ) A statement limiting use of device to physicians who have completed the training program; and
( v ) An expiration date or shelf life.
[81 FR 40183, June 21, 2016]
# C_2014315EN.01006601.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/66

---

Action brought on 28 May 2014 — Best-Lock (Europe) v OHIM — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure)

(Case T-396/14)

2014/C 315/110

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd (Colne, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Becker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lego Juris A/S (Billund, Denmark)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2014 in Case R 1696/2013-4 and declare Community trade mark No 50  450 invalid in respect of Class 28; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2014 in Case R 1696/2013-4 and declare Community trade mark No 50  450 invalid in respect of Class 28;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the three-dimensional mark in the shape of a toy figure for goods in Classes 9, 25 and 28 — Community trade mark No 50  450

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Lego Juris A/S

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: absolute grounds for invalidity

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: the application for a declaration of invalidity was rejected

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52 in conjunction with Article 7(1)(e)(i) and (ii) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.4850 Ultrasonic scaler. ( a ) *Identification.* An ultrasonic scaler is a device intended for use during dental cleaning and periodontal (gum) therapy to remove calculus deposits from teeth by application of an ultrasonic vibrating scaler tip to the teeth.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
<Page>

                                                   [LOGO]

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the
registration statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-65233) (the "Registration
Statement") of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 7, 2003
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 26 0 . RAFAEL CRAPPS v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 1 6

, R a f

a e l C r ap p s p l ed g u i l ty t o t hree co u n t s of ag g rav at ed as s au l t an d

o n e co u n t o f p o s s es si o n o f a fi rearm b y a co n v i c t e d fel o n

. He s ub s eq u en t l y fi l ed

,

am on g o th er th i n g s

, a m o t i on t o wi t h d raw hi s gu i lt y p l ea an d a m o t i o n fo r an o u t -o ft i m e ap p eal

, wh i ch th e t ri a l c o u rt d en i ed

. W e d i s m is sed an ap p l i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew fro m t h at o rd er as u n t i m el y

. See Cas e No

. A 1 8 D0 3 6 6 (Ap r. 3,

2 0 1 8 ). On No v em

b er 6

, 20 1 8 Crap p s fi led a “ m o ti o n t o v acat e ju d g m en t d eem ed

v o i d .” In t h e m o ti o n

, Crap p s arg u ed t h at co un s el p ro v i ded i n effect i v e as s i s t an ce by

f a i l i n g t o i n f

orm h im of a p lea o ffer t h at w as l es s t h an t h e s en t en ce h e ev en t u al l y

recei v ed

. Th e tri al co urt d en i ed h i s m o ti o n

, an d Crap p s fi led t h i s ap p eal

. W e,

h o wev er, l ack ju ri s di ct i o n.

Th e Su p rem e Co u rt h as m ad e cl ear t h at a m o t io n s eek i n g t o ch al l en g e an

al l eg ed l y i n v al i d o r v o i d ju d g m en t o f co n v i ct i o n “ i s n o t o ne o f t he es t ab l i s h ed

p ro ced ures fo r ch al l en gi n g t h e v al id i t y o f a ju d g m en t i n a cri m i n al cas e” an d t h at an

ap p eal fro m t h e den i al o f s u ch a m o t i o n i s s u b ject t o d i sm i s s al

. Ro b er ts v. S t a t e

, 2 8 6

Ga. 5 3 2

, 5 3 2 (6 90 SE2 d 1 5 0 ) (2 0 1 0 ). Becau s e Crap p s i s n o t au t h o ri zed to March 12, 2019co l l at eral l y at t ack h i s co n v i ct i o n i n t h i s m an ner, h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

See i d .; Jo r d

a n v. S t a t e

, 2 5 3 Ga. Ap p . 5 10 , 5 11 (1 ) (5 5 9 SE2 d 5 28 ) (2 0 0 2).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/12/2019
# C_2014129EN.01003301.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/33

---

Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Bunge Argentina v Council

(Case T-116/14)

(2014/C 129/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bunge Argentina SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: J. Bellis and R. Luff, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013, imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (OJ 2013 L 315, p. 2), insofar as it concerns the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013, imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (OJ 2013 L 315, p. 2), insofar as it concerns the applicant; and

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the Institutions have committed a manifest error in the appreciation of the facts by concluding that there was a distortion of the prices of soya beans and soybean oil justifying the application of the second paragraph of Article 2(5) of the Basic Anti-dumping Regulation (1). |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the second paragraph of Article 2(5) of the Basic Antidumping Regulation, as construed by the Institutions in the present case, may not be applied to imports from a WTO member as it is inconsistent with the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the injury assessment fails to take into consideration factors that break the causal link between the alleged injury and the allegedly dumped imports in violation of Article 3(7) of the Basic-Anti-dumping Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2009 L 343, p. 51)

---
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5970 Cranial orthosis. ( a ) *Identification.* A cranial orthosis is a device that is intended for medical purposes to apply pressure to prominent regions of an infant's cranium in order to improve cranial symmetry and/or shape in infants from 3 to 18 months of age, with moderate to severe nonsynostotic positional plagiocephaly, including infants with plagiocephalic-, brachycephalic-, and scaphocephalic-shaped heads.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls) (prescription use in accordance with § 801.109 of this chapter, biocompatibility testing, and labeling (contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, instructions for physicians and parents)).
[63 FR 40651, July 30, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 780 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 780

 To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by sanctuary 
                    cities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Norman, Mrs. 
  Miller of Illinois, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Perry, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Moore of 
Alabama, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Posey, Mr. Zinke, and Mr. Carter of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
     Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by sanctuary 
                    cities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mobilizing Against Sanctuary Cities 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SANCTUARY CITIES INELIGIBLE FOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.

    Any State or local government that violates section 642 of the 
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 
U.S.C. 1373) may not receive any Federal financial assistance (as such 
term is defined in section 7501(a)(5) of title 31, United States Code). 
The Attorney General shall determine annually which State or local 
jurisdictions are not in compliance with section 642 of the Illegal 
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act and shall report 
such determinations to Congress on March 1 of each year. The Attorney 
General shall also issue a report concerning the compliance of any 
particular State or local jurisdiction at the request of any Member of 
Congress. Any jurisdiction that is found to be out of compliance shall 
be ineligible to receive Federal financial assistance for a minimum 
period of one year, and shall only become eligible again after the 
Attorney General certifies that the jurisdiction is in compliance.
                                 <all>
```
§ 520.88g Amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium tablets. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each tablet or chewable tablet contains amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium equivalent to 50 milligrams (mg) amoxicillin and 12.5 mg clavulanic acid, 100 mg amoxicillin and 25 mg clavulanic acid, 200 mg amoxicillin and 50 mg clavulanic acid, or 300 mg amoxicillin and 75 mg clavulanic acid.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsors in § 510.600(c) of this chapter: ( 1 ) No. 054771 for use of tablets and chewable tablets as in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) Nos. 017033 and 069043 for use of tablets as in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 3 ) No. 013744 for use of chewable tablets as in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Dogs* — ( i ) *Amount.* 6.25 milligrams (equivalent to 5 milligrams amoxicillin and 1.25 milligrams clavulanic acid) per pound of body weight twice daily for 5 to 7 days or for 48 hours after all signs have subsided. Deep pyoderma may require treatment for 21 days; do not treat for more than 30 days.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* Treatment of skin and soft tissue infections such as wounds, abscesses, cellulitis, superficial/juvenile and deep pyoderma due to susceptible strains of the following organisms: Beta-lactamase-producing *Staphylococcus aureus,* non-beta-lactamase-producing *Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus* spp., *Streptococcus* spp., and *E. coli.* Periodontal infections due to susceptible strains of both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
( iii ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
( 2 ) *Cats* — ( i ) *Amount.* 62.5 milligrams (50 milligrams amoxicillin and 12.5 milligrams clavulanic acid) twice daily for 5 to 7 days or for 48 hours after all signs have subsided. Urinary tract infections may require treatment for 10 to 14 days or longer. The maximum duration of treatment should not exceed 30 days.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* Treatment of skin and soft tissue infections such as wounds, abscesses, and cellulitis/dermatitis due to susceptible strains of the following organisms: Beta-lactamase-producing *Staphylococcus aureus,* non-beta-lactamase-producing *Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus* spp., *Streptococcus* spp., *E. coli,* and *Pasteurella* spp. Urinary tract infections (cystitis) due to susceptible strains of *E. coli.*
( iii ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[57 FR 37320, Aug. 18, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 55659, Nov. 2, 1995; 63 FR 13121, Mar. 18, 1998; 79 FR 28817, May 20, 2014; 80 FR 34278, June 16, 2015; 82 FR 11508, Feb. 24, 2017; 82 FR 43484, Sept. 18, 2017; 82 FR 58556, Dec. 13, 2017; 87 FR 58960, Sept. 29, 2022; 89 FR 42357, May 15, 2024]
NO. 07-02-0489-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JUNE 17, 2003

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF S.C.H. AND S.L.H., MINOR CHILDREN

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 50123-C; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	Appellant Danny Morris Henry perfected this appeal from the trial court’s order in a suit to modify the parent-child relationship.  Pending before this Court is Henry’s motion to dismiss the appeal by which he represents that he wishes to withdraw his notice of appeal.  The motion is signed by Henry and his counsel and by the attached certificate of conference, counsel indicates that appellee Dawn Lynn Wauer is in agreement.

	Without passing on the merits of the appeal, pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at Henry’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice