alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PHILADELPHIA GEAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Appellee, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a national corporation, in its official capacity as Receiver of Penn Square Bank, N.A., and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a national corporation, in its corporate capacity, Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 84-1901, 84-2007.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 23, 1986.

*904Before LOGAN and McWILLIÁMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us upon remand from the United States Supreme Court. This court’s original opinion appears as *Philadelphia Gear Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,*751 F.2d 1131 (10th Cir.1984). The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on one issue: whether a standby letter of credit backed by a contingent promissory note is an insured deposit under the Federal Deposit Insurance program. It held that such a standby letter of credit is not a “deposit” within the meaning of the Federal Deposit Insurance program, reversing our conclusion to the contrary. *See Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Philadelphia Gear Corporation,*— U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1931, 90 L.Ed.2d 428 (1986). The case was remanded to us for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

We have vacated our earlier judgment. We now conclude that there is nothing further for us to redetermine with respect to the “deposit” issue decided by the Supreme Court. Its opinion conclusively decides that issue against the position of Philadelphia Gear Corporation.

There was before us, in the original appeal, a cross-appeal of Philadelphia Gear as to the total value of the letter of credit, treated in Part V of our opinion. *See*751 F.2d at 1139-40. That issue was not involved in the Supreme Court’s decision, and our affirmance of the district court’s limitation of the value of the letter of credit to $145,200 stands as the law of the case. We reaffirm our determination on that valuation issue and now remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent herewith.
# C_2015302EN.01005101.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2015 — Genossenschaftskellerei Rosswag-Mühlhausen v OHIM (Lembergerland)

(Case T-55/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Lembergerland - Absolute ground for refusal - Trade mark for wine containing geographical indications - Article 7(1)(j) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 302/65)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Genossenschaftskellerei Rosswag-Mühlhausen eG (Vaihingen an der Enz, Germany) (represented by: H. Steffan, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 November 2013 (Case R 566/2013-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Lembergerland as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Genossenschaftskellerei Rosswag-Mühlhausen eG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Genossenschaftskellerei Rosswag-Mühlhausen eG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I, Michael J. Mack, Jr., certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2015-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).

 

 

 

 

 
| Date: January 27,   2016 | By:    | */s/ Michael J. Mack, Jr.*               |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   | Michael J.   Mack, Jr.                   |
|                          |   | President of John Deere   Capital Corporation |
|                          |   | (as Servicer)                                 |

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****National interagency mobilization guide
 
2001 | 2004| 2006 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
2020
 
SuDoc Number: I 53.7/2-2:
Item Number:
CGP System Number:001019014
 
October 11, 2017
 
 
 **
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0568 SAT Date: 6/28/2013 Print Date: 8/4/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2-3 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 21

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG; CORR-E,S,MM,L; ACUTE; DEVEL; AQUATOX
Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0568 FATE: Estimations for the typical,
log Kow = 5.98 (E) S = Dispersible / 0.169 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)
H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.53 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)log Fish BAF = 3.54 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg; 1736-1E Bio Soft S-100: OECD 301B (ModSturm CO2 ev): 64.4-73.0%/28d. Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong - v.strong PBT Potential: P1B2 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for effects on the lung; corrosion to eye, skin, mucous membranes and lung based on properties of the compounds and several 8Es for analogues Also concern for acute toxicity for an analog reported a rabbit dermal minimal lethal dose between 398 and 631 mg/kg) and developmental toxicity based on substituted benzenesulfonic acids. Test Data: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli with and without activation; (-) for chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes with and without activation; rabbit dermal LD0 = 2000 mg/kg; no skin sensitization in guinea pigs using the Buehler assay (induction: 25% ai, challenge: 12.5% ai)

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.31 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.25 green algal 96-h EC50 50 fish

_ chronic value 0.050 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.040
algal

_ chronic value 20
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs alkyl-benzene sulfonate (LAS-type) anionic in linear alkyl hydrophobe ( p redominant form is ); SAR chemical class = -anionic-sulfonate-LAS ; MW 382 ; p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern 4( p pb) SARs anionic SAR Class Ecotox Category Anionic

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**The undersigned certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:**

 

(1)           The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the periodended July 31, 2003 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | September 12, 2003 |   |                                   | /s/ Richard  E. Jahnke |   |
|--------|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|   |               |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |               |   |                                   |
|   |               |   |                                   |
| Date:  | September 12, 2003 |   |                                   | /s/ Dale H.  Johnson   |   |
|   |               |   | Chief  Financial Officer               |

 

1

----
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________ __________ ______ Nos. 14

- 13542 & 14

- 13657

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:13

- cv
- 01116

- SCB

- TGW

WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY , Plaintiff

- Counter Defendant

- Appellee Cross Appellant,

versus DENNIS MARK MONTANA, a Guar dian of Paul N. Blevins, as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., REBEKAH J. PATTERSON, as Guardian of minor children, D.B., D.B., F.B., as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp.,
Defendants

- Counter

Claimants

– Counter Defendants

- Appellants Cross

- Appellees.

________________________

No s . 15

- 10967 & 15

- 11166

________________________ D.C. Doc ket No. 8:13

- cv
- 01116

- SCB

- TGW Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 1 of 32 WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation,
Plaintiff

- Counter Defendant

- Appellant Cross

- Appellee,

versus DENNIS MARK MONTANA, as Guardian of Paul N. Blevins, as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., a Florida citizen, REBEKAH J. PATTERSON, as Guardian of minor children, D.B., D.B. , F.B., as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., a Florida citizen , Defendants

- Counter Claimants

– Counter Defendants

- Appellees Cross

- Appellants.

___________ ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (November 23, 2015)
Before ROSENBAUM , JULIE CARNES, and DUBINA , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: We have before us the related appeals and cross

- appeals in an insurance

coverage dispute between the Western Heritage Insurance Company (“Western Heritage”) and the guardians of Paul Blevins and Blevins’s children (“Blevins”)

. We have carefully reviewed t he record and the parties’ briefs, and we have had the

Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 2 of 33 benefit of oral argument. We now affirm the district court’s orders in all respects for the reasons articulated by the district court in its orders

. AFFIRMED. Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 3 of 3
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C.SECTIONS 1350,**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ebix, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robin Raina, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:                     | /s/ Robin Raina |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|                    |            |   |
| Name:                   | Robin Raina     |   |
|                    |            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |            |
|                    |            |   |
| May 6, 2008        |            |

 

----
#### § 1.1402(a)-7 Net operating loss deduction.

The deduction provided by section 172, relating to net operating losses sustained in years other than the taxable year, is excluded.
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.4335 Operating headlamp. ( a ) *Identification.* An operating headlamp is an AC-powered or battery-powered device intended to be worn on the user's head to provide a light source to aid visualization during surgical, diagnostic, or therapeutic procedures.
( b ) *Classification.* ( 1 ) Class I (general controls) for the battery-powered device. The battery-powered device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
( 2 ) Class II (special controls) for the AC-powered device. The AC-powered device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
[55 FR 48443, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 38813, July 25, 2001; 84 FR 71817, Dec. 30, 2019]
#### Connecticut Television, Inc. *v.*Public Utilities Commission et al.

*Robert A. Beizer*and *Theodore A. Shmanda,*on behalf of Broadcast-Plaza, Inc., in support of the petition.

*John L. Collins,*on behalf of the defendant Community Television System, Inc., et al., in opposition.

Submitted April 3

decided April 15, 1969

The petition by Robert A. Beizer and Theodore A. Shmanda for leave to file a brief as amiei curiae in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County on the date the appellant’s brief is due to be filed is granted.
§ 1.1362-5 Election after termination. ( a ) *In general.* Absent the Commissioner's consent, an S corporation whose election has terminated (or a successor corporation) may not make a new election under section 1362(a) for five taxable years as described in section 1362(g). However, the Commissioner may permit the corporation to make a new election before the 5-year period expires. The corporation has the burden of establishing that under the relevant facts and circumstances, the Commissioner should consent to a new election. The fact that more than 50 percent of the stock in the corporation is owned by persons who did not own any stock in the corporation on the date of the termination tends to establish that consent should be granted. In the absence of this fact, consent ordinarily is denied unless the corporation shows that the event causing termination was not reasonably within the control of the corporation or shareholders having a substantial interest in the corporation and was not part of a plan on the part of the corporation or of such shareholders to terminate the election.
( b ) *Successor corporation.* A corporation is a *successor corporation* to a corporation whose election under section 1362 has been terminated if— ( 1 ) 50 percent or more of the stock of the corporation (the new corporation) is owned, directly or indirectly, by the same persons who, on the date of the termination, owned 50 percent or more of the stock of the corporation whose election terminated (the old corporation); and
( 2 ) Either the new corporation acquires a substantial portion of the assets of the old corporation, or a substantial portion of the assets of the new corporation were assets of the old corporation.
( c ) *Automatic consent after certain terminations.* A corporation may, without requesting the Commissioner's consent, make a new election under section 1362(a) before the 5-year period described in section 1362(g) expires if the termination occurred because the corporation— ( 1 ) Revoked its election effective on the first day of the first taxable year for which its election was to be effective (see § 1.1362-2(a)(2)); or
( 2 ) Failed to meet the definition of a small business corporation on the first day of the first taxable year for which its election was to be effective (see § 1.1362-2(b)(2)).
[T.D. 8449, 57 FR 55454, Nov. 25, 1992]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure
Corporation for the period ended July 31, 2003, I, Ronald F. Richards, Chief
Financial Officer, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003, fully complies
            with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended July
            31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
            condition and results of operations of Biopure Corporation.


/s/ Ronald F. Richards
----------------------
Ronald F. Richards
Chief Financial Officer

September 15, 2003


                                       34
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.1    
  


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  


        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Swedish Export Credit Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Yngwe, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 



	(1)
	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



	(2)
	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 







	/s/  PETER YNGWE      
 Peter Yngwe
 (President)

April 7, 2003	 	 	 	 





        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swedish Export Credit Corporation and will be retained by Swedish
Export Credit Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  


        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Swedish Export Credit Corporation (the "Company") for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jakob Nordin, Executive Director, Financial Control, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 



	(1)
	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



	(2)
	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 







	/s/  JAKOB NORDIN      
 Jakob Nordin
 (Executive Director, Financial
Control)

April 7, 2003	 	 	 	 





        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swedish Export Credit Corporation and will be retained by Swedish
Export Credit Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7843 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and 

Guam Environmental Protection Agency to conduct necessary environmental inspections at military instillations in Guam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2024 

Mr. MOYLAN (for himself, Mr. GIMENEZ, and Mr. VEASEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Guam Environmental 

Protection Agency to conduct necessary environmental 

inspections at military instillations in Guam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Guam EPA Co5 operation Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7843 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO MEMORANDUM OF UN2 DERSTANDING WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL 

3 PROTECTION AGENCY. 

4 The Secretary of Defense may enter into a Memo5 randum of Understanding with the U.S. Environmental 

6 Protection Agency to provide technical assistance and 

7 carry out both federally and locally required environmental 

8 inspections for military construction projects in the terri9 tory of Guam. Such memorandum of understanding may 

10 include or be carried out in consultation with the Guam 

11 Environmental Protection Agency. The Department of 

12 Defense may compensate the U.S. EPA for activities car13 ried out pursuant to such memorandum of understanding. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation for the quarter ended April 30, 2008, I, David A. Butler, Chief Financial Officer,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Biopure Corporation.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ David A. Butler            
|David A. Butler                
|Interim Chief Financial Officer

June 16, 2008



32