alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas K. Equels, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;








Date:  March 20, 2015





/s/ Thomas K. Equels


Thomas K. Equels


Chief Financial Officer
§ 1.1366-4 Special rules limiting the passthrough of certain items of an S corporation to its shareholders. ( a ) *Passthrough inapplicable to section 34 credit.* Section 1.1366-1(a) does not apply to any credit allowable under section 34 (relating to certain uses of gasoline and special fuels).
( b ) *Reduction in passthrough for tax imposed on built-in gains.* For purposes of § 1.1366-1(a), if for any taxable year of the S corporation a tax is imposed on the corporation under section 1374, the amount of the tax imposed is treated as a loss sustained by the S corporation during the taxable year. The character of the deemed loss is determined by allocating the loss proportionately among the net recognized built-in gains giving rise to the tax and attributing the character of each net recognized built-in gain to the allocable portion of the loss.
( c ) *Reduction in passthrough for tax imposed on excess net passive income.* For purposes of § 1.1366-1(a), if for any taxable year of the S corporation a tax is imposed on the corporation under section 1375, each item of passive investment income shall be reduced by an amount that bears the same ratio to the amount of the tax as the net amount of the item bears to the total net passive investment income for that taxable year.
[T.D. 8852, 64 FR 71648, Dec. 22, 1999; 65 FR 12471, Mar. 9, 2000]
# C_2016222EN.01002001.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/20

---

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2016 — Mezhdunaroden tsentar za izsledvane na maltsinstvata i kulturnite vzaimodeystvia v Commission

(Case T-819/14) (1)

((Action for annulment - Contract concerning Union financial assistance in favour of a project seeking to improve the effectiveness of laws combatting discrimination (GendeRace project) - Debit note - Measure not open to challenge - Measure which is part of a purely contractual context from which it is inseparable - Inadmissibility))

(2016/C 222/24)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: Fondatsia ‘Mezhdunaroden tsentar za izsledvane na maltsinstvata i kulturnite vzaimodeystvia’ (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: H. Hristev, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Di Paolo and V. Soloveytchnik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment, first, of the decision contained in the Commission's letter of 22 August 2014 announcing the termination of the audit procedure and the suspension of the recovery of damages in the context of a grant agreement in support of a project and, secondly, of the debit note annexed to that letter and issued by the Commission in order to recover the sum of EUR 34 070,16 paid to the applicant in the context of that project.

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015.

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10864-10865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open meeting of Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice 
Improvement Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 14, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement 
Project Committee will be held Wednesday, April 14, 2010, at 2 p.m. 
Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information, please contact Ms. 
Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 
MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.

[[Page 10865]]

    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 3, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-4892 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.3675 Denis Brown splint. ( a ) *Identification.* A Denis Brown splint is a device intended for medical purposes to immobilize the foot. It is used on young children with tibial torsion (excessive rotation of the lower leg) or club foot.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, regarding general requirements concerning records and § 820.198, regarding complaint files.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 38817, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5880 Implanted spinal cord stimulator for pain relief. ( a ) *Identification.* An implanted spinal cord stimulator for pain relief is a device that is used to stimulate electrically a patient's spinal cord to relieve severe intractable pain. The stimulator consists of an implanted receiver with electrodes that are placed on the patient's spinal cord and an external transmitter for transmitting the stimulating pulses across the patient's skin to the implanted receiver.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
Exhibit 12.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Anthony K. Chan, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on
Form 20-F/A of Borqs Technologies, Inc.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: December 18, 2020 | By: | /s/ Anthony K. Chan                                                                                 
|----------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Anthony K. Chan
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer, 
Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 640.20 Platelets. ( a ) *Proper name and definition.* The proper name of this product shall be Platelets. The product is defined as platelets collected from one unit of blood and resuspended in an appropriate volume of original plasma, as prescribed in § 640.24(d).
( b ) *Source.* The source material for Platelets is plasma which may be obtained by whole blood collection or by plateletpheresis.
[40 FR 4304, Jan. 29, 1975, as amended at 47 FR 49021, Oct. 29, 1982; 50 FR 4139, Jan. 29, 1985; 72 FR 45887, Aug. 16, 2007]
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1270 Estrogens (total, in pregnancy) test system. ( a ) *Identification.* As estrogens (total, in pregnancy) test system is a device intended to measure total estrogens in plasma, serum, and urine during pregnancy. The device primarily measures estrone plus estradiol. Measurements of total estrogens are used to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of fetoplacental distress in certain cases of high-risk pregnancy.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2306, Jan. 14, 2000]
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |  August      14 , 2008 |   | By:    | /s/      Julie Smolyansky                                                |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                        |   |   | Julie      SmolyankyChief      Executive Officer, President and Director |   |
#### Paul JENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry STANGEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 83-2473.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 30, 1986.

Thomas J. Ferrito, Los Gatos, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

William B. Mayfield, San Jose, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.
§ 1.121-5 Suspension of 5-year period for certain members of the uniformed services and Foreign Service. ( a ) *In general.* Under section 121(d)(9), a taxpayer who is serving (or whose spouse is serving) on qualified official extended duty as a member of the uniformed services or Foreign Service of the United States may elect to suspend the running of the 5-year period of ownership and use during such service but for not more than 10 years. The election does not suspend the running of the 5-year period for any period during which the running of the 5-year period with respect to any other property of the taxpayer is suspended by an election under section 121(d)(9).
( b ) *Manner of making election.* The taxpayer makes the election under section 121(d)(9) and this section by filing a return for the taxable year of the sale or exchange of the taxpayer's principal residence that does not include the gain in the taxpayer's gross income.
( c ) *Application of election to closed years.* A taxpayer who would otherwise qualify under §§ 1.121-1 through 1.121-4 to exclude gain from a sale or exchange of a principal residence on or after May 7, 1997, may elect to apply section 121(d)(9) and this section for any years for which a claim for refund is barred by operation of any law or rule of law by filing an amended return before November 11, 2004.
( d ) *Example.* The provisions of this section are illustrated by the following example: Example. B purchases a house in Virginia in 2003 that he uses as his principal residence for 3 years. For 8 years, from 2006 through 2014, B serves on qualified official extended duty as a member of the Foreign Service of the United States in Brazil. In 2015 B sells the house. B did not use the house as his principal residence for 2 of the 5 years preceding the sale. Under section 121(d)(9)and this section, however, B may elect to suspend the running of the 5-year period of ownership and use during his 8-year period of service with the Foreign Service in Brazil. If B makes the election, the 8-year period is not counted in determining whether B used the house for 2 of the 5 years preceding the sale. Therefore, B may exclude the gain from the sale of the house under section 121.
( e ) *Effective date.* This section is applicable for sales and exchanges on or after May 7, 1997.
[T.D. 9152, 69 FR 50306, Aug. 16, 2004]
# C_2015034EN.01004401.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/44

---

Action brought on 9 December 2014 — Gervais Danone v OHIM — San Miguel (B'lue)

(Case T-803/14)

(2015/C 034/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie Gervais Danone (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Lakits, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: San Miguel, Fábricas de Cerveza y Malta, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘B’lue’ — Community trade mark registration No 1 0 5 49  509

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2014 in Case R 1382/2013-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Order OHIM to bear the costs of the present proceedings and the other party to bear the costs of the proceedings before the OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to bear the costs of the present proceedings and the other party to bear the costs of the proceedings before the OHIM.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit 32**

 

## **CERTIFICATION**

 

Theundersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)           The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended July 31, 2005 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the accompanying Reportfairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  |   September 14, 2005   |   | /s/ Rodney A. Young |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Rodney A. Young                       |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
| Date:  |   September 14, 2005   |   | /s/ Dale H. Johnson |   |
|   | Dale H. Johnson                       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

1

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 26, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 26, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0260. SAKS MANAGEMENT AND ASSOCIATES, LLC v. SUNG GENERAL 

CONTRACTING, INC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

17A05545
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7893 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 306 Pickens Street in Marion, Alabama, as 

the ‘‘Albert Turner, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7893 EH

1 SECTION 1. ALBERT TURNER, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 306 Pickens Street in Marion, 

4 Alabama, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Albert 

5 Turner, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Albert Turner, Sr. 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7893 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. ion, Alabama, as the ‘‘Albert Turner, Sr. Post al Service located at 306 Pickens Street in Mar-
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM07-10-002]


Transparency Provisions of Section 23 of the Natural Gas Act; 
Supplemental Notice to Form No. 552 Technical Conference

March 1, 2010.
    As announced in the Notice of Technical Conference issued on 
February 22, 2010, a technical conference will be held on March 25, 
2010, from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. (EST) in the Commission Meeting Room at the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The conference is open for the public to attend.
    In that notice we stated on page 3 that the conference would not be 
webcast. However, we are now planning to webcast the conference. Set 
forth below is the information you will need to view the technical 
conference.
    The webcast of the technical conference is free and registration to 
view the webcast is not required. Webcast viewers will not be permitted 
to participate during the technical conference. Anyone with Internet 
access interested in viewing this conference can do so by navigating to 
Calendar of Events on the FERC Web site. The events will contain a link 
to the applicable webcast option.
    The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the webcasts 
and offers the option of listening to the conferences via phone-bridge 
for a fee. If you have any questions, visit http://www.CapitolConnection.org or call (703) 993-3100.
    For additional information, please contact Christopher Peterson at 
202-502-8933 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e1d362c372d2a312e363b2c700e3b2a3b2c2d31301e383b2c3d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="501338223923243f203835227e0035243522233f3e10363522337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a> and Thomas Russo at 202-
502-8792 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f4a09c9b999587daa68187879bb492918697da939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3064585f5d51431e624543435f70565542531e575f46">[email protected]</span></a> of FERC's Office of Enforcement.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4993 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5570 Nonrebreathing mask. ( a ) *Identification.* A nonrebreathing mask is a device fitting over a patient's face to administer oxygen. It utilizes one-way valves to prevent the patient from rebreathing previously exhaled gases.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 868.9.
[47 FR 31142, July 16, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 1120, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38795, July 25, 2001]
# C_2016314EN.01000401.xml

| 29.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 June 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van koophandel te Gent — Belgium) — New Valmar BVBA v Global Pharmacies Partner Health Srl

(Case C-15/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of goods - Prohibition of measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on exports - Article 35 TFEU - Company established in the Dutch-speaking region of the Kingdom of Belgium - Legislation requiring invoices to be drawn up in Dutch, failing which they are null and void - Cross-border concession agreement - Restriction - Justification - Disproportionate))

(2016/C 314/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van koophandel te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: New Valmar BVBA

Applicant:

Defendant: Global Pharmacies Partner Health Srl

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 35 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a federated entity of a Member State, such as the Flemish Community of the Kingdom of Belgium, which requires every undertaking that has its place of establishment within the territory of that entity to draw up all the details on invoices relating to cross-border transactions exclusively in the official language of that entity, failing which those invoices are to be declared null and void by the national courts of their own motion.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.

1

---