alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     ARMANINO FOODS OF DISTINCTION, INC.
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc. for the period ending March 31,
2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Armanino
Foods of Distinction, Inc.





/s/ Edmond J. Pera
Edmond J. Pera
Chief Financial Officer
April 30, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Armanino Foods of Distinction,
Inc. and will be retained by Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3810 Wrist joint ulnar (hemi-wrist) polymer prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A wrist joint ulnar (hemi-wrist) polymer prosthesis is a mushroom-shaped device made of a medical grade silicone elastomer or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene intended to be implanted into the intramedullary canal of the bone and held in place by a suture. Its purpose is to cover the resected end of the distal ulna to control bone overgrowth and to provide an articular surface for the radius and carpus.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
§ 876.3630 Penile rigidity implant. ( a ) *Identification.* A penile rigidity implant is a device that consists of a pair of semi-rigid rods implanted in the corpora cavernosa of the penis to provide rigidity. It is intended to be used in men diagnosed as having erectile dysfunction.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II. The special control for this device is the FDA guidance entitled “Guidance for the Content of Premarket Notifications for Penile Rigidity Implants.”
[65 FR 4882, Feb. 2, 2000]
§ 1.1381-2 Tax on certain farmers' cooperatives. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1962, farmers', fruit growers', or like associations, organized and operated in compliance with the requirements of section 521 and § 1.521-1, shall be subject to the taxes imposed by section 11 or section 1201. Although such associations are subject to both normal tax and surtax, as in the case of corporations generally, certain special deductions are provided for them in section 1382(c) and § 1.1382-3. For the purpose of any law which refers to organizations exempt from income taxes such an association shall, however, be considered as an organization exempt under section 501. Thus, the provisions of section 243, providing a credit for dividends received from a domestic corporation subject to taxation, are not applicable to dividends received from a cooperative association organized and operated in compliance with the requirements of section 521 and § 1.521-1. The provisions of section 1501, relating to consolidated returns, are likewise not applicable.
( 2 ) Rules governing the manner in which amounts paid as patronage dividends are allowable as deductions in computing the taxable income of such an association are set forth in section 1382(b) and § 1.1382-2. For the tax treatment, as to patrons, of amounts received during the taxable year as patronage dividends, see section 1385 and the regulations thereunder.
( b ) *Cross references.* For tax treatment of exempt cooperative associations for taxable years beginning before January 1, 1963, or for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1962, with respect to payments attributable to patronage occurring during taxable years beginning before January 1, 1963, see section 522 and the regulations thereunder. For requirements of annual returns by such associations, see sections 6012 and 6072(d) and paragraph (f) of § 1.6012-2.
[T.D. 6643, 28 FR 3153, Apr. 2, 1963]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-8028

CALVIN R. MALLORY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus A. T. ROBINSON, Supt.; POWHATAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-829-3) Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 5, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin R. Mallory, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Calvin R. Mallory seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court dismissed the petition without prejudice because the action was not filed on the proper form in violation of the court’s October 4, 2002, pre-filing injunction. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mallory has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Mallory’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis, for “production of documents,” and appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2022

No. 04-22-00062-CR

Ricardo ARREOLA, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-05-0097-CRA

Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 31, 2022, because the record contained no signed order reflecting the trial 

court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to suppress, we ordered the trial court to file a signed order. 

The trial court complied; our October 31, 2022 order is satisfied. We reinstate the appellate 

timetable. 

Appellant’s brief is due on December 14, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2022.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7565 

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2024 

Mr. HUDSON (for himself and Mrs. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Award 

5 Program Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 108 of the Congressional 

8 Award Act (2 U.S.C. 808) is amended by striking ‘‘Octo9 ber 1, 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2029’’. 

10 (b) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE.—If this Act is 

11 enacted after October 1, 2024, the amendment made by 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7565 IH

1 subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted on October 

2 1, 2024. 

3 SEC. 3. OTHER AMENDMENTS. 

4 Section 102 of the Congressional Award Act (2 

5 U.S.C. 802) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Each medal 

7 shall consist of gold-plate over bronze, rhodium over 

8 bronze, or bronze and shall be struck in accordance 

9 with subsection (f).’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (f)(1), in the second sentence, 

11 by striking ‘‘Subject to subsection (a), the’’ and in12 serting ‘‘The’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 1.120-1 Statutory subsistence allowance received by police. ( a ) Section 120 excludes from the gross income of an individual employed as a police official by a State, Territory, or possession of the United States, by any of their political subdivisions, or by the District of Columbia, any amount received as a statutory subsistence allowance to the extent that such allowance does not exceed $5 per day. For purposes of this section, the term “statutory subsistence allowance” means an amount which is designated as a subsistence allowance under the laws of a State, a Territory, or a possession of the United States, any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or the District of Columbia and which is paid to an individual who is employed as a police official of such governmental unit. A subsistence allowance paid to a police official by any of the foregoing governmental units which is not so provided by statute may not be excluded from gross income under the provisions of section 120. The term “police official” includes an employee of any of the foregoing governmental units who has police duties, such as a sheriff, a detective, a policeman, or a State police trooper, however designated.
( b ) The exclusion provided by section 120 is to be computed on a daily basis, that is, for each day for which the statutory allowance is paid. If the statute providing the allowance does not specify the daily amount of such allowance, the allowance shall be converted to a daily basis for the purpose of applying the limitation provided herein. For example, if a State statute provides for a weekly subsistence allowance, the daily amount is to be determined by dividing the weekly amount by the number of days for which the allowance is paid. Thus, if a State trooper receives a weekly statutory subsistence allowance of $40 would be $8, that is, $40 divided by 5 for 5 days of the week, the daily amount would be $8, that is, $40 divided by 5. However, for purposes of this section, only $5 per day may be excluded, or $25 on a weekly basis.
( c ) Expenses in respect of which the allowance under section 120 is paid may not be deducted under any provision of the income tax laws except to the extent that ( 1 ) such expenses exceed the amount of the exclusion, and
( 2 ) the excess is otherwise allowable as a deduction. For example, if a State statute provides a subsistence allowance of $3 per day and the taxpayer, a state trooper, incurs expenditures of $4.50 for meals while away from home overnight on official police duties only $3 would be excludable under this section. Expenses relating to such exclusion ($3) may not be deducted under any provision of the income tax laws. However, the remaining $1.50 may be an allowable deduction under section 162 as traveling expenses while away from home in the performance of official duties. See § 1.162-2.
( d ) In the case of taxable years ending after September 30, 1958, section 120 and this section do not apply to amounts received as a statutory subsistence allowance for any day after September 30, 1958.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of the west-central part of the southern anthracite 
field and adjoining areas, Pennsylvania

#### Professional Paper 602

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp602 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:24
# C_2014212EN.01004301.xml

| 7.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/43

---

Action brought on 23 May 2014 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-353/14)

2014/C 212/55

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato, and G. Palmieri, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/276/14 Administrators (AD 5) for drawing up a reserve list of 137 candidates to fill vacant posts for Administrators (AD 5), published in volume C 74 A of the Official Journal of the European Union on 13 March 2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/276/14 Administrators (AD 5) for drawing up a reserve list of 137 candidates to fill vacant posts for Administrators (AD 5), published in volume C 74 A of the Official Journal of the European Union on 13 March 2014;

Official Journal of the European Union

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised are those set out in Case T-275/13 Italy v Commission (OJ 2014 C 74 A, p. 4).

Italy

Commission

---
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3110 Dental amalgam capsule. ( a ) *Identification.* A dental amalgam capsule is a container device in which silver alloy is intended to be mixed with mercury to form dental amalgam.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 13830, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38797, July 25, 2001]
EXHIBIT 4.10


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                       HARLEYSVILLE GROUP CAPITAL TRUST I

         This Certificate of Trust of Harleysville Group Capital Trust I (the
"Trust"), dated as of April 7, 2003, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory
Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801, et seq.).

         1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is "Harleysville
Group Capital Trust I".

         2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust with its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is
Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North 1100 North Market Street,
Wilmington, Delaware 19890-1600.

         3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.


<PAGE>




         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.

                                              WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                              not in its individual
                                              capacity, but solely as
                                              Property Trustee


                                              By:  /s/ Kathleen A. Pedelini
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: Kathleen A. Pedelini
                                              Title: Financial Services Officer


                                              WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in
                                              its individual capacity, but
                                              solely as Delaware Trustee


                                              By:  /s/ Kathleen A. Pedelini
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: Kathleen A. Pedelini
                                              Title: Financial Services Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION     I, Edward P. Smolyansky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Lifeway Foods, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for three month period endedMarch 31, 2007:     (1) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     (2) that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.Date:May 15, 2007       /s/ Edward P. Smolyansky         Chief Financial and Accounting Officerand Treasurer
# C_2014151EN.01002801.xml

| 19.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/28

---

Action brought on 17 March 2014 — Ferring v OHIM — Kora Corporation (Koragel)

(Case T-169/14)

2014/C 151/35

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ferring BV (Hoofddorp, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kora Corporation Ltd (Swords, Ireland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 January 2014 given in Case R 721/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 January 2014 given in Case R 721/2013-4;

| — | Order the defendant and the intervener, should it intervene, to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the intervener, should it intervene, to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Koragel’ for goods in Class 5 –Community trade mark application No 10 490 027

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘CHORAGON’ for goods in Class 5 — Community trade mark registration No 8 695 314

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1)(b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2015228EN.01002603.xml

| 13.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/26

---

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — EEB v Commission

(Case T-462/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 228/37)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 15.9.2014.

1

---