alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7883 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the duty of the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs to provide a veteran with a medical examination 

in connection with certain claims for disability compensation under the 

laws administered by the Secretary, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2024 

Mr. SELF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the duty 

of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide a veteran 

with a medical examination in connection with certain 

claims for disability compensation under the laws administered by the Secretary, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Toxic Exposures Ex5 amination Improvement Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7883 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DUTY OF SECRETARY OF VET2 ERANS AFFAIRS TO PROVIDE FOR MEDICAL 

3 EXAMINATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH CER4 TAIN CLAIMS FOR DISABILITY COMPENSA5 TION; CLARIFICATIONS WITH RESPECT TO 

6 CERTAIN EXPOSURE TRACKING RECORD SYS7 TEM. 

8 (a) MODIFICATION.—Section 1168(a) of title 38, 

9 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘such evi10 dence is not sufficient to establish a service connection for 

11 the disability’’ and inserting ‘‘such evidence does not con12 tain sufficient medical evidence for the Secretary to make 

13 a decision on the claim’’. 

14 (b) CLARIFICATIONS.—Such title is further amend15 ed— 

16 (1) in section 1119(a)(1), by inserting ‘‘that in17 dicates that the veteran was subject to a toxic expo18 sure’’ after ‘‘tracking record system’’; and 

19 (2) in subclause (i) of section 1710(e)(4)(C), by 

20 inserting ‘‘that indicates that the veteran was sub21 ject to a toxic exposure’’ before ‘‘for the veteran’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES
                   SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                         Washington, DC 20549

                               FORM 8-K

                            CURENT REPORT
  Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Date of Report (Date of earliest reported): July 3, 2002

                        CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC.
   ____________________________________________________________________
         (Exact name of registrant as specified in its chapter)

         Delaware                0-20680               52-178189
_________________________  _______________________  _______________________
(State of other juris-     (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer
diction of incorporation)                           Identification No.)

2950 Colorful Avenue, Longmont, CO                80504
_____________________________           ______________________________
(Address of princiapl executive         (Zip Code)
offices)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (303) 682-7147

Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure.

On July 2, 2001, Concepts Direct, Inc. issued a press release,
which announced that Concepts Direct was taking steps to reduce
its expenses including a reduction in its workforce and decrease
in its catalog circulation.  A copy of the press release is
included under Item 7, Exhibit 99.1.

Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

Exhibit                 Description

99.1                    Concepts Direct, Inc. Press Release *

*      Exhibit filed herewith.

                          SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                 CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC.


Date: July 3, 2002            /S/Cody S. Mcgarraugh
                              ___________________________
                              Cody S. McGarraugh
                              Chief Financial Officer


Exhibit 99.1

Add Press Release
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,402,104
<SECURITIES>                                34,484,076
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,290,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,932,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,496,999
<PP&E>                                       1,754,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,619,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,695,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       192,946
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,730,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,619,161
<SALES>                                     27,936,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,936,449
<CGS>                                        9,955,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,441,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,396,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,396,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,396,026)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.44)



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with EMRISE Corporation’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:

 

1.             the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA                                    |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Carmine T. Oliva                                        |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive   Officer) |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
### ack-casting of 

### RE rates ry Nudd to: Marty Robin 0812612010 04:35 PM

... ~~-w:.w<~-%e%m.>,w-m.*~,m*<T~\" Poppen email. 

### ----- Forwarded by Gregory NuddlR9IUSEPAIUS on 08/26/201004:35 PM 

### -----

From: Matthew Poppen

## - AQDX <MPoppen@mail.maricopa.gov> To: Gregory NuddlR9IUSEPNUS@EPA Cc: Bob Downing

## - AQDX <BDowning@rnail.rnaricopa.gov> Date: 0411912010 02:44 PM Subject: Back-castingof RE ratesGregTable 

### 2 of the attachment shows what the 

### 2005 PEI RE rates would have been if the methodology used in the 

### 2008 PEI was applied. Let me know if you have further questions. Thanks, 

### Matt Poppen Air Quality Planner Maricopa CountyAir Quality Department Phone: 602-506-6 707 Fax: 602-506-61 

### 79

RE Summary Tables .docx
# C_2014292EN.01006002.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/60

---

Action brought on 30 April 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-40/14)

2014/C 292/78

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to increase the applicant’s pension rights in the European Union pension scheme by application of the new General Implementing Provisions of Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of 3 March 2011 of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials inapplicable; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of 3 March 2011 of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials inapplicable;

| — | Annul the decisions of 30 September 2013 and 9 December 2013 to increase the pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service, on their transfer into the EU institutions’ pension scheme, by application of the General Implementing Provisions of 3 March 2011 of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of 30 September 2013 and 9 December 2013 to increase the pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service, on their transfer into the EU institutions’ pension scheme, by application of the General Implementing Provisions of 3 March 2011 of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
§ 1.1016-2 Items properly chargeable to capital account. ( a ) The cost or other basis shall be properly adjusted for any expenditure, receipt, loss, or other item, properly chargeable to capital account, including the cost of improvements and betterments made to the property. No adjustment shall be made in respect of any item which, under any applicable provision of law or regulation, is treated as an item not properly chargeable to capital account but is allowable as a deduction in computing net or taxable income for the taxable year. For example, in the case of oil and gas wells no adjustment may be made in respect of any intangible drilling and development expense allowable as a deduction in computing net or taxable income. See the regulations under section 263(c).
( b ) The application of the foregoing provisions may be illustrated by the following example: Example: A, who makes his returns on the calendar year basis, purchased property in 1941 for $10,000. He subsequently expended $6,000 for improvements. Disregarding, for the purpose of this example, the adjustments required for depreciation, the adjusted basis of the property is $16,000. If A sells the property in 1954 for $20,000, the amount of his gain will be $4,000.
( c ) Adjustments to basis shall be made for carrying charges such as taxes and interest, with respect to property (whether real or personal, improved or unimproved, and whether productive or unproductive), which the taxpayer elects to treat as chargeable to capital account under section 266, rather than as an allowable deduction. The term *taxes* for this purpose includes duties and excise taxes but does not include income taxes.
( d ) Expenditures described in section 173 to establish, maintain, or increase the circulation of a newspaper, magazine, or other periodical are chargeable to capital account only in accordance with and in the manner provided in the regulations under section 173.
§ 884.5070 Vacuum abortion system. ( a ) *Identification.* A vacuum abortion system is a device designed to aspirate transcervically the products of conception or menstruation from the uterus by using a cannula connected to a suction source. This device is used for pregnancy termination or menstrual regulation. This type of device may include aspiration cannula, vacuum source, and vacuum controller.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
§ 1.1402(e)-4A Period for which exemption is effective. ( a ) *In general.* If an application for exemption on Form 4361: ( 1 ) Is filed by a minister, a member of a religious order, or a Christian Science practitioner eligible to file such an application (see particularly paragraph (a) (2) and (3) of § 1.1402(e)-2A), and
( 2 ) Is approved (see paragraph (c) of § 1.1402(e)-2A), the exemption from the tax on self-employment income shall be effective for the first taxable year ending after 1967 for which such minister, member, or practitioner has net earnings from self-employment of $400 or more any part of which was derived from the performance of service in his capacity as a minister, member, or practitioner, and for all succeeding taxable years. See, however, paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and (d)(2) of § 1.1402(c)-5 relating to ministers and members of religious orders and paragraph (b)(2) of § 1.1402(c)-6 relating to Christian Science practitioners.
( b ) *Exemption irrevocable.* An exemption granted to a minister, a member of a religious order, or a Christian Science practitioner pursuant to the provisions of section 1402(e) is irrevocable.
[T.D. 7333, 39 FR 44450, Dec. 24, 1974]
# C_2014431EN.01004101.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/41

---

Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Hong Kong Group v OHIM — WE Brand (W E)

(Case T-718/14)

(2014/C 431/65)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hong Kong Group Oy (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: J. Spåre, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: WE Brand Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark including the word element ‘W E’ — Application for registration No 1 0 7 63  795

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 August 2014 in Case R 2305/2013-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and uphold the application for a Community trade mark registration lodged by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and uphold the application for a Community trade mark registration lodged by the applicant;

| — | order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1) (b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1) (b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.2460 Electrically powered spinal fluid pressure monitor. ( a ) *Identification.* An electrically powered spinal fluid pressure monitor is an electrically powered device used to measure spinal fluid pressure by the use of a transducer which converts spinal fluid pressure into an electrical signal. The device includes signal amplification, conditioning, and display equipment.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4858]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 617

RIN 3052-AC45

Borrower Rights; Effective Interest Rates; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency), through the 
FCA Board (Board), issued a final rule under part 617 on December 22, 
2009 (74 FR 67970) amending FCA's regulations to ensure that borrowers 
with loans directly tied to a widely publicized external index receive 
appropriate disclosure of interest rate changes in accordance with 
statutory requirements while allowing Farm Credit System institutions 
to provide the notices in a more efficient manner. In accordance with 
12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of the final rule is 30 days from 
the date of publication in the Federal Register during which either or 
both Houses of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the 
sessions of Congress, the effective date of the regulations is March 2, 
2010.

DATES: Effective Date: Under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 2252, the 
regulation amending 12 CFR part 617 published on December 22, 2009 (74 
FR 67970) is effective March 2, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline R. Melvin, Policy Analyst, 
Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4498, TTY (703) 883-4434, or Howard 
Rubin, Senior Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit 
Administration, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 
883-4020.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

    Dated: March 3, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-4858 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 6, 2015

d1103

Order 

Clerk

November 6, 2015

152208-9(40)

SC: 152208-9

In re MOTTWEILER, Minors. COA: 325278; 325279

Cass CC Family Division:

13-000086-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

30, 2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
# C_2014253EN.01004902.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/49

---

Action brought on 4 June 2014 — Volkswagen v OHIM (ULTIMATE)

(Case T-385/14)

2014/C 253/65

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by U. Sander, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 March 2014 in Case R 1787/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 March 2014 in Case R 1787/2013-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ULTIMATE for goods and services in Classes 12, 28, 35 and 37

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2016038EN.01005101.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/51

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2015 — Sony Computer Entertainment Europe v OHIM — Marpefa (Vieta)

(Case T-690/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community figurative mark Vieta - Genuine use of the mark - Nature of use - Article 15(1) and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark - Proof of use for the registered goods))

(2016/C 038/66)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Marpefa, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: I. Barroso Sánchez-Lafuente, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 July 2014 (Case R 2100/2013-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited and Marpefa, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 2 July 2014 (Case R 2100/2013-2) in so far as it dismissed the appeal against the decision of the Cancellation Division to reject the application for the revocation of the Community figurative mark Vieta for ‘apparatus for the reproduction of sound and images’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 2 July 2014 (Case R 2100/2013-2) in so far as it dismissed the appeal against the decision of the Cancellation Division to reject the application for the revocation of the Community figurative mark Vieta for ‘apparatus for the reproduction of sound and images’;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.

1

---