10690 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

156.6 MHz—(channel 12)—Working 

(U.S. Stations in Sector 2 of the River). 

156.55 MHz—(channel 11)—Working 

(Canadian Stations in Sector 3, Lake 

Ontario and Lake Erie). 

■ 5. Revise § 401.63 to read as follows: 

§ 401.63 Radio Procedures. 

Every vessel shall use the channels of 

communication in each control sector as 

listed in the table to this section. 

CHANNELS OF COMMUNICATION

Station 

Control 

sector 

number 

Sector limits Call in Work Listening 

watch 

Seaway Beauharnois ..... 1 C.I.P No. 2 to C.I.P No. 6–7 ....................................... Ch. 14 .......... Ch. 14 .......... Ch. 14. 

Seaway Eisenhower ....... 2 C.I.P. No. 6–7 to C.I.P. No. 10–11 ............................. Ch. 12 .......... Ch. 12 .......... Ch. 12. 

Seaway Iroquois ............. 3 C.I.P. No. 10–11 To Crossover Island ........................ Ch. 11 .......... Ch. 11 .......... Ch. 11. 

Seaway Clayton ............. 4 Crossover Island to Cape Vincent .............................. Ch. 13 .......... Ch. 13 .......... Ch. 13. 

Seaway Sodus ............... 4 Cape Vincent to Mid Lake Ontario .............................. Ch. 12 .......... Ch. 12 .......... Ch. 16. 

Seaway Newcastle ......... 5 Mid Lake Ontario To C.I.P. No. 15 ............................. Ch. 11 .......... Ch. 11 .......... Ch. 16. 

Seaway Welland ............ 6 C.I.P. No. 15 to C.I.P. No. 16 ..................................... Ch. 14 .......... Ch. 14 .......... Ch. 14. 

Seaway Long Point ........ 7 C.I.P. No. 16 to Long Point ......................................... Ch. 11 .......... Ch. 11 .......... Ch. 16. 

■ 6. In § 401.90, add a new paragraph 

(d) to read as follows: 

§ 401.90 Boarding for inspections. 

* * * * * 

(d) Vessels shall provide a safe and 

approved means of boarding. Pigeon 

holes are not accepted as a means of 

boarding and an alternate safe means of 

access shall be provided. 

■ 7. In § 401.94, revise paragraph (a) to 

read as follows: 

§ 401.94 Keeping copies of documents. 

(a) A copy of these Regulations 

(subpart A of part 401), a copy of the 

vessel’s valid Vessel Inspection Report 

and the Seaway Notices for the current 

navigation year shall be kept on board 

every vessel in transit. For the purposes 

of this section, a copy may be kept in 

either paper or electronic format so long 

as it can be accessed in the wheelhouse. 

* * * * * 

■ 8. In Schedule III to Subpart A— 

Calling-in table, revise sections 

numbered (18), (35), and (36) to read as 

follows: 

SCHEDULE III TO SUBPART A OF PART 401—CALLING-IN TABLE

C.I.P. and checkpoint Station to call Message content 

* * * * * * * 

18. Sodus Point ................................................ Seaway Sodus, Channel 12 ............................. 1. Name of Vessel. 

2. Location. 

3. ETA Mid-Lake Ontario. 

* * * * * * * 

35. Mid-Lake Ontario-Entering Sector 4 ........... Seaway Sodus, Channel 12 ............................. 1. Name of Vessel. 

2. Location. 

36. Sodus Point ................................................ Seaway Sodus, Channel 12 ............................. 1. Name of Vessel. 

2. Location. 

3. Updated ETA Cape Vincent or Lake Ontario 

Port. 

4. Confirm River Pilot Requirement. 

5. Pilot requirement—Snell Lock and/or Upper 

Beauharnois Lock. (inland vessels only). 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

Issued at Washington, DC, on March 3, 

2010. 

Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 

Corporation. 

Collister Johnson, Jr., 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4898 Filed 3–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–61–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0859; FRL–9123–3] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, San Joaquin 

Valley Air Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of 

revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Air 

Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) 

portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions were proposed in the Federal 

Register on December 18, 2009 and 

concern reduction of animal matter and 

volatile organic compound (VOC) 

emissions from crude oil production, 

cutback asphalt, and petroleum solvent 

dry cleaning. We are approving local 

rules that regulate these emission 

sources under the Clean Air Act as 

amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective on April 8, 2010. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 10691 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number EPA–R09–OAR–2009–0859 for 

this action. The index to the docket is 

available electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 

at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California. While all 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the index, some information may be 

publicly available only at the hard copy 

location (e.g., copyrighted material), and 

some may not be publicly available in 

either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the 

hard copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joanne Wells, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4118, wells.joanne@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On December 18, 2009 (74 FR 67154), 

EPA proposed to approve the following 

rules into the California SIP. 

Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted 

SJVAPCD ......... 4104 Reduction of Animal Matter .......................................................................... 12/17/92 8/24/07 

SJVAPCD ......... 4404 Heavy Oil Test Station—Kern County .......................................................... 12/17/92 8/24/07 

SJVAPCD ......... 4641 Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance 

Operations.

12/17/92 8/24/07 

SJVAPCD ......... 4672 Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaning Operations ............................................... 12/17/92 8/24/07 

We proposed to approve these rules 

because we determined that they 

complied with the relevant CAA 

requirements. Our proposed action 

contains more information on the rules 

and our evaluation. 

II. Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

EPA’s proposed action provided a 30- 

day public comment period. We did not 

receive any comments on the proposed 

action. 

III. EPA Action 

No comments were submitted that 

change our assessment that the 

submitted rules comply with the 

relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, 

as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the 

Act, EPA is fully approving these rules 

into the California SIP. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by May 10, 2010. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES
10692 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

Dated: February 12, 2010. 

Jane Diamond, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

■ Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(351) (i)(C) to read 

as follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(351) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air 

Pollution Control District. 

(1) Rule 4104, ‘‘Reduction of Animal 

Matter,’’ Rule 4404, ‘‘Heavy Oil Test 

Station—Kern County,’’ adopted May 

21, 1992 and amended on December 17, 

1992. 

(2) Rule 4641, ‘‘Cutback, Slow Cure, 

and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and 

Maintenance Operations,’’ Rule 4672, 

‘‘Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaning 

Operations,’’ adopted April 11, 1991 and 

amended on December 17, 1992. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2010–4967 Filed 3–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 10–340; MB Docket No. 10–21; RM– 

11590] 

Television Broadcasting Services; 

Birmingham, AL 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission has before it 

a petition for rulemaking filed by 

Alabama Educational Television 

Commission, the licensee of 

noncommercial educational station 

WBIQ(TV), channel *10, Birmingham, 

Alabama, requesting the substitution of 

channel *39 for channel *10 at 

Birmingham. 

DATES: This rule is effective March 9, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adrienne Y. Denysyk, Media Bureau, 

(202) 418–1600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Report 

and Order, MB Docket No. 10–21, 

adopted February 26, 2010, and released 

March 2, 2010. The full text of this 

document is available for public 

inspection and copying during normal 

business hours in the FCC’s Reference 

Information Center at Portals II, CY– 

A257, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. This document 

will also be available via ECFS (http:// 

fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/). This document 

may be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 

800–478–3160 or via the company’s 

Web site, http://www.bcipweb.com. To 

request materials in accessible formats 

for people with disabilities (braille, 

large print, electronic files, audio 

format), send an e-mail to 

fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202– 

418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (tty). 

This document does not contain 

information collection requirements 

subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

information collection burden ‘‘for small 

business concerns with fewer than 25 

employees,’’ pursuant to the Small 

Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, 

Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. 

The Commission will send a copy of 

this Report and Order in a report to be 

sent to Congress and the Government 

Accountability Office pursuant to the 

Congressional review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 

801(a)(1)(A). 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Television, Television broadcasting. 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission amends 47 CFR Part 73 as 

follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. 

§ 73.622 [Amended] 

■ 2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments 

under Alabama, is amended by adding 

channel *39 and removing channel *10 

at Birmingham. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Clay C. Pendarvis, 

Associate Chief, Video Division, Media 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4980 Filed 3–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 80 

[WT Docket No. 04–257 and RM–10743; FCC 

10–6] 

Maritime Communications 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission published in the Federal 

Register of February 2, 2010 (75 FR 

5241), a document in the Maritime 

Radio Services, WT Docket No. 04–257, 

which included a Final Rules Appendix 

that reflected the amended adoption of 

a certain rule. This document corrects 

the amendment of that section as set 

forth below. 

DATES: March 9, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stana Kimball, Mobility Division, 

Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 

at Stanislava.Kimball@FCC.gov or at 

(202) 418–1306, or TTY (202) 418–7233. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Federal Communications Commission 

published a document in the Federal 

Register of February 2, 2010 (75 FR 

5241) to ensure that its rules governing 

the Maritime Radio Services continue to 

promote maritime safety, maximize 

effective and efficient use of the 

spectrum available for maritime 

communications, accommodate 

technological innovation, avoid 

unnecessary regulatory burdens, and 

maintain consistency with international 

maritime standards to the extent 

consistent with the United States public 

interest. This document corrects a rule 

amendment set forth in the document 

published in the Federal Register of 

February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241). 

In rule FR Doc. 2010–2095 published 

on February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241), make 

the following correction: 

§ 80.385 [Corrected] 

■ On page 5241, in the third column, 

revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as 

follows: 

‘‘(a) * * * 

(1) The Automated Maritime 

Communications System (AMTS) is an 

automated maritime 

telecommunications system.’’ 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with RULES