alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.4510 Apical closure device. ( a ) *Identification.* An apical closure device is a prescription device consisting of a delivery system and implant component that is used for soft tissue approximation of cardiac apical tissue during transcatheter valve replacement procedures.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The patient contacting materials must be evaluated to be biocompatible.
( 2 ) Performance data must validate the sterility of the patient-contacting components of the device.
( 3 ) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the labeled shelf life.
( 4 ) Non-clinical performance testing data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Consistent and reliable implant deployment;
( ii ) Assessment of implant pull-out force; and
( iii ) Sheath size compatibility with implant.
( 5 ) In vivo evaluation of the device must demonstrate device performance, including device operation resulting in closure of the myocardial wound.
( 6 ) Labeling must include the following: ( i ) Detailed information explaining how the device operates;
( ii ) Sheath size that device can accommodate;
( iii ) Identification of the minimum myocardial wall thickness to ensure optimal device function; and
( iv ) A shelf life.
[81 FR 71371, Oct. 17, 2016]
Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups






Exhibit 4.3

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Statements on Schedule 13D


The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Brian Reilly as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to sign on the undersigned’s behalf any or all Statements on Schedule 13D, and any or all  amendments thereto, or any other documents whatsoever, relating to the common stock of Masisa S.A., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact or agent, full power and authority to do and perform  each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the promises, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact or agent, or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.




Dated as of 4 April 2003.






/s/ Roberto Artavia Loria
——————————————————
Roberto Artavia Loria
02/07/2011 09:28 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS a 001/00 3 

•PsRTMENTOF 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^: iPQRTATJON' 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ^iZ'^^ 'CiiS 

Complainant, 

V. 

Sun Quest Executive Air Charter, Inc. 

Respondent. 

-"1 ~<. \ 

Federal Aviation Admini strati on» 

r:3 0 ^ 2::i 

FAA Docket No CPOSWSo'OOi" 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2008-0238 

Complainant's Request for a 30-Day Extension of Time 

To Submit Supplemental Brief 

1, I'he FAA Decisionmaker, by Order Requesting Further Briefing, 

dated January 5, 2011, asked that the parties submit briefs regarding 

some issues. 

2, Complainant, by counsel, hereby requests a 30-day extension of time 

within which to file such a brief 

3, The issues raised by the FAA Decisionmaker require extensive 

coordination within the agency to make sure that assertions made in 

the Complainant's Supplemental Brief have the support of the 

appropriate experts ajid managers in the agency. 
" -•••''J|i?v«|W' 

t^li 

• >\ . 

;*it' *^"~^ 

.iVi^: 

'rtifj •'{-'i"'f^-'"'-'i ^^'•i^- . 

/r .n • 

I •u-u:,'^tt^i ^'••-

• \->- . 

•^li^rff vJ«rt:J. : 'Vn;(;j";< 

li,'i.irSllfc*;i;-ir.(r' ^'fd. 

f}-:m>^^^^^', at:^j'- : 
02/07/201 1 09:2 8 FAX 202493514 2 FAA + QMS 0002/003 

4. Complainant's counsel obtained Respondent's counsel agreement to a 

30-day extension for both briefs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter .L Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement, AGC-300 

-y^^^^^^ ^ 

Byx^oseph A. Conte 

L-'-Counsel for Complainant 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington DC 20591 

202 267 7381 

r^;;k 
•'*t' *'K" I 

t rr.,-:-Mmi: c:i,<. l^J^ 

} • .:--;.m^-/^r--

'^n> 
02/07/201 1 09:2 8 FAX 2024935142 FAA •* DMS @I003/003 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this date I hand-delivered the original of the 

attached document (Complainant's Request for a 30-Day Extension of 

Time to File Supplemental Brief) in the Matter of Sun Quest Executive 

Air Charter, Inc., Docket No CP08WP0004 and 2 copies, addressed to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building Suite 2W1000 

And, I hereby certify that a copy of that document was sent by FAX and 

certified United States Mail, postage-prepaid, to 

Arthur Wasserman, Esq. 

Wassennan & Miller 

16380 Roscoe Blvd., Suite 120 

VanNuys, CA 91406-1221 

FAX 818 895 0675 

Dated: February 4, 201 I 

^v^ 
•Ilw.illipll.p •'; 'K Y 

i , 'li- 'S-'i - • 

"•u'":'xtk! 

•!^l^ : : . 

I, 

i m
EXHIBIT 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
        following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-213865) pertaining
to the AC Immune SA 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, the Employee Stock Option and Share Plan of AC Immune (2005), and the Stock Option
Plan – AC Immune of December 31, 2004 of AC Immune SA, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-216539) pertaining
to the AC Immune SA 2016 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AC Immune SA
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



of our report dated March 17, 2017, with
respect to the financial statements of AC Immune SA, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31,
2016.





/s/ Ernst & Young AG





|Geneva, Switzerland
|-------------------
|March 17, 2017
1-96-1137FRANCISCA HERNANDEZ,               ) APPEAL FROM THE                                   ) CIRCUIT COURT OF       Plaintiff-Appellee,         ) COOK COUNTY                                   )       v.                          )                                   )WOODBRIDGE NURSING HOME,           ) HONORABLE                                   ) KATHY M. FLANAGAN,       Defendant-Appellant.        ) JUDGE PRESIDING.     JUSTICE McNAMARA delivered the opinion of the court:     Defendant, Woodbridge Nursing Home, appeals from an orderdenying its motion to strike a prayer for treble damages forinjuries plaintiff, Francisca Hernandez, allegedly sustained as aresident of the nursing home.  Plaintiff filed her complaint onFebruary 23, 1995, and seeks treble damages under section 3-602of the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act (210 ILCS 45/3-602 (West1994)), as it existed on that date.  During the pendency ofplaintiff's action, the treble damages provision of section 3-602was repealed by Public Act 89-197.  Pub. Act 89-197, eff. July21, 1995 (amending 210 ILCS 45/3-602 (West 1994)).  The soleissue on appeal is whether the amended section 3-602 shall applyto causes of action accruing and actions filed prior to July 21,1995.  The trial court entered an order certifying the questionfor interlocutory appeal to this court.  155 Ill. 2d R. 308.  Forthe reasons set forth below, we hold that the trial courtproperly denied defendant's motion to strike plaintiff's claimfor treble damages.     On February 23, 1995, plaintiff filed a one-count complaintagainst Woodbridge.  The complaint alleges that, in August 1993,as a resident of the nursing home, plaintiff fell whileattempting to transfer herself from her wheelchair to a toiletseat.  The complaint also alleges that, in October 1993,plaintiff fell again when a Woodbridge employee could not supporther during a transfer from a toilet seat to her wheelchair.  Thecomplaint alleges that defendant acted negligently in providinginadequate surveillance and supervision; in failing to evaluateplaintiff's risk of falling; in allowing plaintiff to fall inAugust and October 1993; and in not providing adequate medicalcare after her falls.     At the time the alleged negligence occurred in 1993, andwhen plaintiff filed her complaint on February 23, 1995, section3-602 of the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act (210 ILCS 45/3-602(West 1994)) provided:               "�
3535 Peachtree Road, Suite 520-425 Atlanta, GA 30326404.229.3044 

July 13, 2015 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption 11979, Regulatory Docket No. FAA2015-1456, issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 

of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

 Flight Guardian, LLC was issued Exemption numbered 11979 (the “Exemption”) for the 

purpose of conducting scripted, closed-set filming for the motion picture and television industry and 

still photography using the DJI Phantom 2 airframe. Flight Guardian herby requests an amendment 

to the Exemption to allow it to use additional airframes of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) under the 

same terms and conditions contained in the Exemption. 

 The additional airframes are as follows: 

1. DJI Inspire 1 

2. DJI S900 

3. DJI S1000 

Attached hereto are the Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) for each of the 

above. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption. 

 As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for the addition of other types of 

unmanned aerial vehicles to the Exemption. Flight Guardian respectfully submits that good cause 

exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. 

 Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an 

amendment to the Exemption. 

Sincerely yours, 

David Paul Hilton 

Manager, Flight Guardian 

404.229.3044 

cc: Mr. L. J. Johnson
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: March 2, 2010.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         FDIC Ref. No.                  Bank name                City              State           Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10188.........................  Carson River Community    Carson City......  NV...............  2/26/2010
                                 Bank.
10189.........................  Rainier Pacific Bank....  Tacoma...........  WA...............  2/26/2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-4798 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 7, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130326 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130326 

 COA: 257149 

Wayne CC: 04-001652-01 

GREGORY RAY WASHINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 22, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

t0531 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 7, 2006 

Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.4750 Skull punch. ( a ) *Identification.* A skull punch is a device used to punch holes through a patient's skull to allow fixation of cranioplasty plates or bone flaps by wire or other means.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 882.9. This exemption does not apply to powered compound cranial drills, burrs, trephines, and their accessories classified under § 882.4305.
[44 FR 51730, Sept. 4, 1979, as amended at 65 FR 2319, Jan. 14, 2000]
# C_2015034EN.01005001.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/50

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 10 December 2014 — Turkington v European Commission

(Case F-127/14)

((Civil service - Civil servants - Pensions - Transfer of pension rights acquired under a national pension scheme - Proposal concerning the crediting of pensionable years not challenged within the prescribed time period - No new material facts - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 034/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stephen Turkington (Trier, Germany) (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

The application for annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to recalculate the crediting of pension rights acquired by the applicant under the Union pension scheme pursuant to the general implementing provisions relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Order Mr Turkington to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order Mr Turkington to bear his own costs.

---
"Jane Staveley" 

<jstaveley@exponent.com>

02/09/2011 12:20 PM

To EHPV-Program-Submissions@EPA

cc

"Franz, Christina" 

<Christina_Franz@americanchemistry.com>, "Ralph Parod" 

<ralph.parod@basf.com>, "David A Cortes" 

bcc

Subject Revised test plan and robust summaries for 

2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (CAS No. 89-00-9)

On behalf of BASF Corporation, the attached submission is made under the EHPV Program. A 

revised test plan and revised robust summaries are hereby submitted for 2,3-pyridinedicarboxylic 

acid (CAS No. 89-00-9). As explained in the cover letter, the robust summaries have been 

entered into HPVIS but a pdf file is attached for your convenience. 

Please contact me if you have any problems with the submission or any questions.

Thank you.

Jane Staveley

Senior Managing Scientist

Ex

ponent®

1000 Centre Green Way, Suite 200

Cary, NC 27513

Phone: 919-228-6480

Mobile: 919-961-0987 

Fax: 919-228-6501

Email: jstaveley@exponent.com

www.exponent.com
 - PDC submission Letter_2-9-11.pdf - PDC Revised test plan_2-9-11.pdf - PDC revised 

HPVIS submission 2-8-11.pdf
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.4770 Ophthalmic operating spectacles (loupes). ( a ) *Identification.* Ophthalmic operating spectacles (loupes) are devices that consist of convex lenses or lens systems intended to be worn by a surgeon to magnify the surgical site during ophthalmic surgery.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 33355, Sept. 2, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 35606, Sept. 14, 1988; 66 FR 38813, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.2420 Electronic monitor for gravity flow infusion systems. ( a ) *Identification.* An electronic monitor for gravity flow infusion systems is a device used to monitor the amount of fluid being infused into a patient. The device consists of an electronic transducer and equipment for signal amplification, conditioning, and display.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7987 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7987

  To require plain language and the inclusion of key words in covered 
   notices that are clear, concise, and accessible to small business 
                   concerns, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2024

  Mr. LaLota (for himself and Mr. Thanedar) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require plain language and the inclusion of key words in covered 
   notices that are clear, concise, and accessible to small business 
                   concerns, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Plain Language in Contracting Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCESSIBILITY AND CLARITY IN COVERED NOTICES FOR SMALL BUSINESS 
              CONCERNS.

    (a) In General.--Each covered notice shall be written--
            (1) in a manner that is clear, concise, and accessible to a 
        small business concern; and
            (2) in a manner consistent, to the extent practicable, with 
        the Federal plain language guidelines established pursuant to 
        the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (5 U.S.C. 301 note).
    (b) Inclusion of Key Words in Covered Notices.--Each covered notice 
shall, to the maximum extent practicable, include key words in the 
description of the covered notice such that a small business concern 
seeking contract opportunities using the single governmentwide point of 
entry described under section 1708 of title 41, United States Code, can 
easily identify and understand such covered notice.
    (c) Rulemaking.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration shall issue rules to carry out this section.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Covered notice.--The term ``covered notice'' means a 
        notice pertaining to small business concerns published by a 
        Federal agency on the single Government-wide point of entry 
        described under section 1708 of title 41, United States Code.
            (2) Small business act definitions.--The terms ``Federal 
        agency'' and ``small business concern'' have the meanings given 
        those terms, respectively, in section 3 of the Small Business 
        Act (15 U.S.C. 632).

SEC. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO.

    No additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act or the amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Electronic Docket Index for

[EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0726]

Approval and Limited Approval and Limited Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation 

Plans; California; Mendocino County Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source 

Permits

I. SIP Submittal Documents

I-A SIP submittal letter from CARB, dated November 15, 2016

I-B Rule 1-130 – Definitions, clean copy

I-C Rule 1-200 – Permit Requirements, clean copy

I-D Rule 1-220 – New Source Review Standards, clean copy

I-E Rule 1-230 – Action on Applications, clean copy

I-F Rule 1-130 – Definitions, strike out copy

I-G Rule 1-200 – Permit Requirements, strike out copy

I-H Rule 1-220 – New Source Review Standards, strike out copy

I-I Rule 1-230 – Action on Applications, strike out copy

II. Federal Register Notices1

II-A 50 FR 30942, July 31, 1989 (Rules 1-220 and 1-230)

II-B 54 FR 14650, April 12, 1989 (Rule 1-200)

II-C 57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992 (Title I General Preamble)

II-D 73 FR 28321, May 16, 2008 (NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule)

II-E 75 FR 64864, October 20, 2010 (PM2.5 PSD Increments – SILS - SMC Rule)

II-F 76 FR 26192, May 6, 2011 (Rule 1-130)

II-G 78 FR 73698, December 9, 2013

II-H 80 FR 50199 August 19, 2015 (Subject to regulation vacatur)

II-I 81 FR 18766, April 1, 2016

II-J 81 FR 58010, August 24, 2016

III.Other Relevant Documents

III-A Submittal Completeness Letter, November 15, 2016

III-B EPA’s Technical Support Document for MCAQMD Rules 1-130, 1-200, 1-220, &

1-230, December 6, 2016

III-C Rule 1-130 – Definitions, clean copy 

III-D Rule 1-200 – Permit Requirements, clean copy

III-E Rule 1-220 – New Source Review Standards, clean copy

III-F Rule 1-230 – Action on Applications, clean copy

 

1 All Federal Register notices listed after 1993 are available on-line at: 

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FR
IV.EPA Rulemaking Documents

IV-A Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking dated December 27, 2016 (81

FR 95074)