alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-SG1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series  2015-SG1

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February  25, 2016

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q 

(Mark One)

(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

or

( )   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number        033-14852-01
AMERICAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Exhibit 34.6



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Tothe Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,
Inc. (the Company), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing
criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 4, 2016



LOGO



|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP,2001Ross Avenue,Suite1800,Dallas,Texas75201
T:(214)999-1400,F:(214)754-7991,www.pwc.com/us
[Cite as State v. Pink, 2013-Ohio-3082.]

 

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 BUTLER COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2012-10-209 

 : D E C I S I O N

 - vs - 7/15/2013 

 : 

JAMES PINK, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. CR2011-08-1268 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael A. Oster, Jr., Government 

Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appellee 

Billy W. Guinigundo, 5331 South Gilmore Road, Fairfield, Ohio 45014, for defendantappellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral 

argument having been waived. 
Butler CA2012-10-209

 - 2 - 

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, James Pink, has filed a brief with this court 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that 

a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the 

trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 

744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to 

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant 

on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief 

and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

HENDRICKSON, P.J., S. POWELL and RINGLAND, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.4

                         FIRST COMMUNITY BANK OF AMERICA

                      INCENTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

Purpose: The Plan's purpose would be to reward those Officers of the Bank who
have (1) contributed to the Bank's current profitability, and/or (2)
demonstrated the potential to contribute to the Bank's future profitability.

Eligibility: All full-time Bank Officers would be eligible to participate in the
Plan, however it is anticipated that awards will be concentrated on a relatively
few key individuals.

Amount Available: The maximum amount available for awards will be determined
annually by FCBA Board of Directors and will be related to the financial
institution's achievement of its profitability objectives. For 2001, it is
proposed that the following formula will apply:

FCBA Net Income          Maximum Plan Award
---------------          ------------------
(less than)0             Zero
$350,000                 $78,000
(greater than)$350,000   20% of net income (max. $100,000)

Total Plan awards may be less than the maximum provided by the formula.

Individual Awards: The CEO will recommend to the Executive Committee all Plan
awards other than his own. The Executive Committee will determine the CEO's Plan
award, as well as revise or approve all other awards. All such actions would
then be submitted to FCBA's Board of Directors for approval.

Method of Payment: Plan awards granted would normally be paid in five equal
annual installments, commencing in January of the year following the award. An
annual "interest factor" would be paid on the amount deferred, ranging from zero
to thirty percent, depending on the financial institution's profitability for
the year involved. The "interest factor" would be determined annually by the
Board of Directors, after receiving a recommendation from the Executive
Committee. Should a Plan Participant leave the Bank (other than for disability
or retirement) that Participant would forfeit any unpaid portion of his or her
award. All awards would be immediately vested upon a change of control.
# C_2015056EN.01000601.xml

| 16.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 27 November 2014 — SIA ‘VM Remonts’ (formerly SIA ‘DIV un Ko’), SIA ‘Ausma grupa’, SIA ‘Pārtikas kompānija’ v Konkurences padome

(Case C-542/14)

(2015/C 056/08)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: SIA ‘VM Remonts’ (formerly SIA ‘DIV un Ko’), SIA ‘Ausma grupa’, SIA ‘Pārtikas kompānija’

Applicants:

Defendant: Konkurences padome

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 101(1) TFEU be interpreted as meaning that, in order for it to be established that an undertaking has participated in an agreement restricting competition, it must be shown that an officer of the undertaking has personally engaged in conduct or been aware of, or consented to, conduct by persons providing an external service to the undertaking and at the same time acting on behalf of other parties to a possible prohibited practice?

---
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.3610 Rigid pneumatic structure orthosis. ( a ) *Identification.* A rigid pneumatic structure orthosis is a device intended for medical purposes to provide whole body support by means of a pressurized suit to help thoracic paraplegics walk.
( b ) *Classification.* Class III (premarket approval).
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before December 26, 1996 for any rigid pneumatic structure orthosis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before December 26, 1996 been found to be substantially equivalent to a rigid pneumatic structure orthosis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other rigid pneumatic structure orthosis shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 17742, May 11, 1987; 61 FR 50711, Sept. 27, 1996]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8000 

To limit closures and consolidations of United States Postal Service mail 

processing facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2024 

Mr. GOLDEN of Maine (for himself and Mr. PFLUGER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To limit closures and consolidations of United States Postal 

Service mail processing facilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Timely Mail Delivery 

5 and Postal Services Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CLOSURE AND CONSOLIDATION OF 

7 MAIL PROCESSING FACILITIES. 

8 (a) PROHIBITING ON CARRYING OUT MAIL PROC9 ESSING FACILITY REVIEW.—Notwithstanding any other 

10 provision of law, the United States Postal Service may not 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8000 IH

1 carry out the United States Postal Service Mail Proc2 essing Facility Review (or any successor program), and 

3 no Federal funds (including amounts in the Postal Service 

4 Fund under section 2003 of title 39, United States Code) 

5 may be obligated or expended to carry out such Review. 

6 (b) LIMITATION ON CHANGES TO MAIL PROCESSING

7 FACILITIES.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

9 provision of law, the Postal Service may not imple10 ment or otherwise carry out any changes to the op11 erations of its mail processing facilities (including 

12 consolidation or partial consolidation, aggregation of 

13 processing, distribution, or delivery operations) until 

14 on or after the date that the Postal Regulatory 

15 Commission issues an advisory opinion on the pro16 posed facility changes. 

17 (2) DEADLINE.—The Postal Regulatory Com18 mission shall issue the advisory opinion required 

19 under paragraph (1) not later than 120 business 

20 days after the date the Postal Service submits to the 

21 Commission a proposed change to any such facility. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald F. Richards, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
   annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: June 14, 2004

/s/ Ronald F. Richards
--------------------------
Ronald F. Richards
Chief Financial Officer

                                       37
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                TRANSITION
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         886,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,789,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,297,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,631,000
<PP&E>                                       8,127,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,121,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,564,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,091,000
<BONDS>                                      3,549,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          794,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,018,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,956,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,564,000
<SALES>                                      7,887,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,887,000
<CGS>                                        6,524,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,524,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (875,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (889,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (889,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3358 Hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A hip joint metal/polymer/metal semi-constrained porous-coated uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across the joint. This generic type of device has a femoral component made of a cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (Co-Cr-Mo) alloy or a titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy and an acetabular component composed of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene articulating bearing surface fixed in a metal shell made of Co-Cr-Mo or Ti-6Al-4V. The femoral stem and acetabular shell have a porous coating made of, in the case of Co-Cr-Mo substrates, beads of the same alloy, and in the case of Ti-6Al-4V substrates, fibers of commercially pure titanium or Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The porous coating has a volume porosity between 30 and 70 percent, an average pore size between 100 and 1,000 microns, interconnecting porosity, and a porous coating thickness between 500 and 1,500 microns. The generic type of device has a design to achieve biological fixation to bone without the use of bone cement.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
[58 FR 3228, Jan. 8, 1993]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                                              August 27, 2003




Carl Rausch
Biopure Corporation
11 Hurley Street
Cambridge, MA 02411

RE: Agreement concerning sale of common stock

Dear Mr. Rausch:

On today's date you intend to sell 100,000 shares of Biopure Corporation
("Company") Class A Common Stock ("Common Stock") to a purchaser pursuant to
arrangements made for you by the Company. In consideration of the Company's
services in assisting you in arranging this sale, you have agreed that you will
not sell any shares of common stock that you own prior to April 15, 2004 except
that you may sell to members of the Board of Directors or to substantial
stockholders of the Company. You also acknowledge and agree with the Company's
insider trading policy, which prohibits hedging transactions.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            BIOPURE CORPORATION



                                            By:
                                               ---------------------------
                                                  Ronald F. Richards
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Agreed August 27, 2003


---------------------------
Carl W. Rausch
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              66
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                        14
<INVENTORY>                                      5,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,990
<PP&E>                                           3,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               86
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,850
<SALES>                                          6,659
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,659
<CGS>                                            5,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (21)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (7)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (14)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (14)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>