alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.5899 Trunk and limb electrical stimulator to treat headache. ( a ) *Identification.* A trunk and limb electrical stimulator to treat headache is a device intended to treat headache through the application of electrical stimulation anywhere on the body of the patient apart from the patient's head or neck through electrodes placed on the skin. The stimulation may be provided transcutaneously or percutaneously.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. This testing must include: ( i ) Characterization of the electrical stimulation, including the following: Waveforms; output modes; maximum output voltage and maximum output current (at 500Ω, 2kΩ, and 10kΩ loads); pulse duration; frequency; net charge per pulse; and maximum phase charge, maximum current density, maximum average current, and maximum average power density (at 500Ω);
( ii ) Characterization of the impedance monitoring system; and
( iii ) Characterization of the electrode performance including the electrical performance, adhesive integrity, shelf-life, reusability, and current distribution of the electrode surface area.
( 2 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 3 ) Performance testing must demonstrate electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety in the intended use environment.
( 4 ) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
( 5 ) Labeling must include the following: ( i ) Instructions for use, including the typical sensations experienced during treatment;
( ii ) A detailed summary of the electrical stimulation output, and the device technical parameters, including any wireless specifications;
( iii ) A shelf life for the electrodes and reuse information; and
( iv ) Instructions on care and cleaning of the device.
[86 FR 68401, Dec. 2, 2021]
# C_2016156EN.01001302.xml

| 2.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/13

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v Aspiro SA, formerly BRE Ubezpieczenia sp. z o.o.

(Case C-40/15) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 135(1)(a) - Exemption for insurance - Definition of ‘insurance’ transactions and of ‘related services performed by insurance brokers and insurance agents’ - Claims settlement services provided by and on behalf of an insurer))

(2016/C 156/18)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minister Finansów

Applicant:

Defendant: Aspiro SA, formerly BRE Ubezpieczenia sp. z o.o.

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 135(1)(a) Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that claims settlement services, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, provided by a third party in the name and on behalf of an insurance company, do not fall within the exemption laid down by that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 155, 11.5.2015.

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00822-CR

Bobbie Gutierrez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-13-0901, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Bobbie Gutierrez has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal, which is signed

by appellant and her counsel in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 19, 2016

Do Not Publish
II 

Calendar No. 245 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 786 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 13), 2023 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an additional place for holding court for the Pecos Division 

of the Western District of Texas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL PLACES FOR HOLDING COURT. 

4 (a) PECOS DIVISION OF THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF

5 TEXAS.—Section 124(d)(6) of title 28, United States 

6 Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (7), 

7 by inserting ‘‘and Alpine’’ after ‘‘Pecos’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 786 PCS

1 (b) WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.—Section 

2 128(b) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by in3 serting ‘‘Mount Vernon,’’ after ‘‘Tacoma,’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 

2023. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 245 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 786 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide 

N

and for other purposes. Pecos Division of the Western District of Texas, an additional place for holding court for the 

OVEMBER 14 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 13), 2023 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                       261
<INVENTORY>                                      6,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,217
<PP&E>                                           5,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,846
<BONDS>                                          2,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,860
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,214
<SALES>                                         27,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,825
<CGS>                                           18,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,189)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,231)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,231)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
## Supreme Court ofthe United States Office of the Clerk 

### Washington, DC 20543-0001 December 7, 2015 Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals ofTexas P.O. Box 12308 

### Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 Re: Juan Lizcano v. Texas No. 15-65 (Your No. WR-68,348-03) Dear Clerk: Scott S. Harris Clerk of the Court (202)479-3011

RECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS 

### DEC 1h 2015 Abel Acosta, Clerk

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is denied. Sincerely, 

## ~6u\ Scott S. Harris, Clerk
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Dennis B. Vennard

The motion by the state to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

*664
      *George D. Stoughton,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*Wesley G. Gryk,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued December 2

decided December 2, 1969
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.5200 Intravascular catheter. ( a ) *Identification.* An intravascular catheter is a device that consists of a slender tube and any necessary connecting fittings and that is inserted into the patient's vascular system for short term use (less than 30 days) to sample blood, monitor blood pressure, or administer fluids intravenously. The device may be constructed of metal, rubber, plastic, or a combination of these materials.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
EXHIBIT 10.9 (e)

                            PARTIAL LOAN SATISFACTION


         Pursuant to the terms of that certain Loan Agreement dated November 8,
2000, (the "Loan") Ledger Technologies Pty. Ltd. (the "Lender") acknowledges
that on November __, 2002 it received a payment in the amount of Two Hundred
Thousand Dollars [$200,000 (USD)] from I.T. Technology, Inc. (the "Borrower") in
partial satisfaction of the amounts due and owing by the Borrower to the Lender
under the Loan. The Lender also acknowledges and accepts that Instanz Pty. Ltd,
on or about the same date shall be receiving a payment in the amount of One
Hundred Thousand Dollars [$100,000 (USD)] from the Borrower in connection with
its outstanding Loan Agreement with the Borrower.


                                    LENDER - LEDGER TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD.

                                                 By: /s/ Lisa Mochkin
                                                 Name: Lisa Mochkin
                                                 Its:  Director

                                                 I. T. TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                                                 By: /s/ Yam-Hin Tan
                                                 Name: Yam-Hin Tan
                                                 Its:  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1.1400Z2(e)-1 [Reserved]
### 1 Site Visit Report Alaska Seafood Processing Industry Petition Response

Lindsay Guzzo Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Permits Division guzzo.lindsay@epa.gov

206-553-0268 Betsy Bicknell Senior Environmental Engineer Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG) betsy.bicknell@erg.com

703-633-1612

Plant Name Trident Seafoods

Plant Address Cordova, Alaska

NPDES Permit # Discharge through Trident Seafoods permit: AKG520493

Date of Visit Thursday, August 19, 2010 People Contacted Rick Isaacson PWS Operations Manager



### The content of this site visit report has b een removed because Trident Seafood claims that

it is Confidential Business Information.
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1680 Stationary x-ray system. ( a ) *Identification.* A stationary x-ray system is a permanently installed diagnostic system intended to generate and control x-rays for examination of various anatomical regions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). A radiographic contrast tray or radiology diagnostic kit intended for use with a stationary x-ray system only is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 84 FR 71818, Dec. 30, 2019]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: John Moore Services, Inc. and John Moore Renovation, LLC v. The Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Houston Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00906

- CV

Trial co urt case number: 2012

- 35162

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

This case has been referred to mediation, along with a parallel related proceeding,

No. 01

- 14

- 00687

- CV, which was submitted on March 31, 2015. In the interest of judicial

econ omy, the parties are hereby advised that motions to extend time to file briefs in this proceeding (No. 01

- 14

- 00906

- CV) will be disfavored and will be granted only in the event of extraordinary circumstances. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d). The reporter’s reco rd was filed on March 19, 2015, making appellants’ brief due April 20 , 2015. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a)(2). Assuming the appellants’ brief is timely filed, the appellee’s brief will be due no later May 20

, 2015. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(b). A reply brief, if any, will be due no later than June 9 , 2015. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(c). As such, this appeal can be set for submission by June 2015. Should oral argument be granted by the court, counsel are advised that any such argument is tentatively scheduled for June 30, 20 15. The parties remain free to file their briefs earlier than the deadlines imposed by the Rules of Appellate Procedure, and in light of the court’s efforts to streamline its consideration of these related appeals, that would be greatly appreciated by the court. See also Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d).

Appellants are ordered to immediately supplement the clerk’s record with any filings relevant to deadlines concerning the joinder of parties and the filing of amended pleadings. Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). They should also supplement the record with notices of submission, if any, for their motion to consolidate. All parties are ordered to review the appellate record now and supplement it as they may deem necessary, to avoid delay in the briefing schedule. Absent

extrao rdinary circumstances, supplementation of the appellate record will not be considered good cause to alter the briefing schedule.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Co urt

Date: April 1, 2015
Exhibit 10.6
 THE TIMBERLAND COMPANY
2007 INCENTIVE PLAN
 Restricted Stock Award Agreement
     3.   For purposes of this Agreement:




---



##### 



(a)
    
    Cause shall mean (i) the willful and continued failure of the
Executive to substantially perform his duties with the Company (other than any
such failure resulting from incapacity due to physical or mental illness),
after a written specific demand by the Companys Board of Directors for
substantial performance is delivered to the Executive, (ii) fraud or dishonesty
by the Executive with respect to the Company, or (iii) the Executives
conviction of, or plea of nolo contendreto, any non-vehicular felony. The
Company may treat a termination of the Executives employment as termination
for Cause only after (A) giving the Executive written notice of the intention
to terminate for Cause and of his right to a hearing in front of the Board of
Directors of the Company and (B) conducting such hearing at least ten (10) days
after such notice at which the Executive may be represented by counsel.(b)
    
    Disability shall mean eligibility by the Executive for
benefits under the Companys Long Term Disability Plan.(c)
    
    Good Reason shall mean resignation or other voluntary
termination of employment by the Executive within the <<___>>
days following (i) a permanent material reduction of the Executives duties and
responsibilities or a permanent change in the Executives duties and
responsibilities such that the Executives duties and responsibilities are
materially inconsistent with the type of duties and responsibilities of the
Executive in effect immediately prior to such reduction or change, (ii) a
material reduction in the Executives compensation or Executive benefits if
such reduction results in the Executives receiving compensation and benefits
which are, in the aggregate, less than the compensation and benefits then
currently received by the Executive (other than reductions of compensation or
benefits applicable to management executives of the Company in general), or
(iii) relocation of the Executives principal place of work without his consent
to a location more than <<___>> miles from its current location, or
(iv) the imposition, without the Executives consent, of a significant increase
in the travel requirements that cause the Executive to be away from his
principal place of work for a significantly greater period of time than prior
to such increase.




---



##### 



THE TIMBERLAND COMPANYBy:ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
 Date:
|  | Ground Water & Drinking WaterRecent Additions | Contact Us | Print 										Version 										Search: 										EPA Home >					 Water > 					Ground Water & Drinking Water >					                     National Primary Drinking Water Regulations - VOC's - Technical                     Version |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| NATIONAL PRIMARY        DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS
**Contaminant Specific Fact Sheets****Volatile Organic Chemicals - Technical Version**
EPA             811-F-95-004-T            October 1995
To see the most current health effects information for each of these         contaminants, please visit          www.epa.gov/safewater/mcl.html.
AcrylamideEpichlorohydrinBenzeneEthylbenzeneCarbon tetrachlorideStyreneChlorobenzeneTetrachloroethyleneo-DichlorobenzeneToluenep-Dichlorobenzene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,1,2-Trichloroethanecis-and trans- 1,2-DichloroethyleneDichloromethaneTrichloroethylene1,2-DichloropropaneVinyl ChlorideXylenes (Total)�   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                |  | Safewater Home | 	  About Our Office | 	  Publications | 	  Calendar | 	  Links | 	  Office of Water | 	  En Español |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |
|                                                                |
| EPA Home | 			Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us

  |
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.5430 Nonelectrically powered fluid injector. ( a ) *Identification.* A nonelectrically powered fluid injector is a nonelectrically powered device used by a health care provider to give a hypodermic injection by means of a narrow, high velocity jet of fluid which can penetrate the surface of the skin and deliver the fluid to the body. It may be used for mass inoculations.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 02

- 00 484

- CV

Chadwick J. Zellers , Appellant

v.

Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. , Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 99

- 04463 , HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Chadwick J. Zellers has filed an agreed motion to dismiss. We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

___________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant =

s Motion

Filed: February 27, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 9, 2011 

0302 

Order 

 

March 9, 2011 

141742 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141742 

 COA: 289521 

Oakland CC: 2007-212928-FH 

FRANK MICHAEL DRUZYNSKI, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 MARILYN KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
§ 1.1503-1 Computation and payment of tax. ( a ) *General rule.* In any case in which a consolidated return is filed or required to be filed, the tax shall be determined, computed, assessed, collected, and adjusted in accordance with the regulations prescribed under section 1502 promulgated prior to the last date prescribed by law for the filing of such return.
( b ) *Limitation.* If the affiliated group includes one or more Western Hemisphere trade corporations (as defined in section 921) or one or more regulated public utilities (as defined in section 1503 (c)), the increase in tax described in section 1503 (a) shall be applied in a manner provided in the regulations under section 1502.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12105, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 7244, 37 FR 28897, Dec. 30, 1972]