alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2004-D-0375] (formerly Docket No. 2004D-0555)

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Labeling for Natural Rubber Latex Condoms Classified Under 21 CFR 884.5300” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug                               ( print page 4961)                            Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3793.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of November 10, 2008 (73 FR 66645), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0633. The approval expires on December 31, 2011. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: January 16, 2009.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E9-1803 Filed 1-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- Contact

### Cretaceous ammonites from the lower part of the Matanuska 
Formation, southern Alaska, with a stratigraphic summary

#### Professional Paper 547

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 10**                                 
  (1684 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and					   
Notices

U.S. Department of the					   Interior |				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp547 
                    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact				   Page				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 2012 
00:05:54
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 794 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 794

 To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine and mask requirement in Head Start 
                               Programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2023

 Mr. Joyce of Ohio (for himself, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Moolenaar, and 
 Mr. Rutherford) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To eliminate the COVID-19 vaccine and mask requirement in Head Start 
                               Programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Mandates on Head Start 
Educators Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE COVID-19 VACCINE AND MASK REQUIREMENT IN HEAD 
              START PROGRAMS.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not implement, 
enforce, or otherwise give effect to the rule entitled ``Vaccine and 
Mask Requirements To Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in Head Start 
Programs'' published by the Department of Health and Human Services on 
November 30, 2021 (86 Fed. Reg. 68052), and may not promulgate any 
substantially similar rule.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1.1311(b)-2 Correction not barred at time of erroneous action. ( a ) An adjustment under the circumstances stated in paragraph (b) of § 1.1312-3 (relating to the double exclusion of an item of gross income) which would result in an additional assessment, is authorized only if assessment of a deficiency against the taxpayer or related taxpayer for the taxable year in which the item is includible was not barred by any law or rule of law at the time the Commissioner first maintained, in a notice of deficiency sent pursuant to section 6212 (or section 272(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939) or before the Tax Court of the United States, that the item described in paragraph (b) of § 1.1312-3 should be included in the gross income of the taxpayer in the taxable year to which the determination relates.
( b ) An adjustment under the circumstances stated in § 1.1312-4 (relating to the double disallowance of a deduction or credit), which would result in the allowance of a credit or refund, is authorized only if a credit or refund to the taxpayer or related taxpayer, attributable to such adjustment, was not barred by any law or rule of law when the taxpayer first maintained in writing before the Commissioner or the Tax Court that he was entitled to such deduction or credit for the taxable year to which the determination relates. The taxpayer will be considered to have first maintained in writing before the Commissioner or the Tax Court that he was entitled to such deduction or credit when he first formally asserts his right to such deduction or credit as, for example, in a return, in a claim for refund, or in a petition (or an amended petition) before the Tax Court.
( c ) Under the circumstances of adjustment with respect to which the conditions stated in this section are applicable, the conditions stated in § 1.1311(b)-1 (maintenance of an inconsistent position) are not required. See paragraph (b) of § 1.1312-3 and § 1.1312-4 for examples of the application of this section.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12032, Nov. 26, 1960]
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special Servicer,
LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS,
as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-CCRE25 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of
this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018



Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank
#### Commonwealth v. Palik, etc.

*Edward B. Madden,*for Commonwealth.

*Thomas H. Armstrong,*for defendant.

October 7, 1952.

Rowley, P. J.,

This matter is before the court, after allowance, upon appeal from a summary conviction.

Samuel C. Bono filed his information before an alderman, wherein he complained that defendant George Palik did “refuse to pay wages lawfully due to affiant, in violation of Act of April 24, 1913, P. L. 114, 43 PS §251-3.”

The alderman convicted defendant and imposed a fine of $50 and costs of prosecution, whereupon this appeal followed.

Section 1 of the Act of 1913, P. L. 114, provides:

> “Unless otherwise stipulated in the contract of hiring, each person, firm, or corporation employing any person, other than at an annual salary, shall pay to such person his or her earnings or wages semi-monthly. The first payment shall be made between the first and fifteenth day of each month, and the second payment shall be made between the fifteenth and the last day of each month.”

Section 2 of that statute provides:

> “Any person, firm, or corporation that shall violate any of the provisions of this Act shall be guilty of *396a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof before any alderman, magistrate, or justice of the peace of the proper county shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars (100.)”.

Opposing counsel have submitted to the court an agreed statement of facts which includes the following:

> “3. The defendant is a member of a partnership known as Farrell Taxi Cab Company, and the prosecutor was an employe of said Company.

> “4. The prosecutor alleged that the Taxi Cab Company was indebted to him in an amount less than One Hundred Dollars. The defendant Taxi Cab Company claimed a set-off.

> “5. The Company had a regular agreed weekly pay day for all employes.”

Counsel for appellant contends that the statute, above quoted, “applies only when no special time of payment has been agreed upon and does not apply when wages are payable monthly or any other agreed regular time.”

In support of this principle, appellant cites: Bauer v. Reynolds, 3 Dist. R. 502; Com. v. Marsh, 3 Dist. R. 489; Commonwealth v. Lipschultz et al., 19 D. & C. 415; Commonwealth v. Muller et ux., 31 D. & C. 372; Com. v. Matthewson, 36 Luz. 27.

Counsel for appellee offers nothing contra.

Inasmuch as appellee concedes, in the agreed facts, that his employer “had a regular agreed weekly pay day for all employes,” it is obvious that the present prosecution cannot be sustained.

*Order*

And now, October 7, 1952, this matter came on for argument, whereupon, after due consideration, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal be sustained and the conviction by the alderman reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7959 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7959

     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to 
        inadmissibility and deportability related to squatting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2024

      Mr. Meuser (for himself, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Reschenthaler, Ms. 
   Malliotakis, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, and Mr. Crenshaw) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to 
        inadmissibility and deportability related to squatting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safeguarding Homes from Illegal 
Entry, Living, and Dwelling Act'' or the ``SHIELD Act''.

SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY AND DEPORTABILITY RELATED TO SQUATTING.

    (a) Inadmissibility.--Section 212(a)(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
                    ``(J) Trespass.--Any alien who has been convicted 
                of, who admits having committed, or who admits 
                committing acts which constitute the essential elements 
                of an offense for trespass, as those terms are defined 
                under the law of the jurisdiction where the conviction, 
                offense, or acts constituting the essential elements of 
                the offense occurred, without regard to whether the 
                conviction or offense is classified as a misdemeanor or 
                felony under Federal, State, tribal, or local law, is 
                inadmissible.''.
    (b) Deportability.--Section 237(a)(2) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
                    ``(G) Trespass.--Any alien who has been convicted 
                of, who admits having committed, or who admits 
                committing acts which constitute the essential elements 
                of an offense for trespass, as those terms are defined 
                under the law of the jurisdiction where the conviction, 
                offense, or acts constituting the essential elements of 
                the offense occurred, without regard to whether the 
                conviction or offense is classified as a misdemeanor or 
                felony under Federal, State, tribal, or local law, is 
                inadmissible.''.
                                 <all>
```
Fw: clean RIA chapters for OMB, keeping under 5MB 

 12/16/2011 08:00 PM 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/16/2011 08:00 PM 

----- 

From: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Alex 

Barron/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, DavidA 

Evans/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/16/2011 07:58 PM 

Subject: clean RIA chapters for OMB, keeping under 5MB 

Ron Evans 

Leader, Air Economics Group 

HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA 

Mail Drop C-439-02 

919-541-5488 

919-541-0839 fax 

Chapter 4_mercuryHAPbenefits_1216_FINAL.docx 

Chapter 3_CostEconomicEnergy_1216_FINAL.docx 

Chapter 6_EmploymentandEconomicImpactsfinal.docx 

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBenefits_1216_FINAL.doc 

Chapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1216 FINAL.docx
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation (the Company) for
the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Zafiris G. Zafirelis, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Zafiris G. Zafirelis   
|                     |  |     |  | Zafiris G. Zafirelis       
|                     |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
secretary Chu 

From: WEBMASTER, DOE 

Sent: 

To: 

Tuesday, August 28,20121:47 AM 

Secretary Chu 

Subject: Form submission from: Contact Us 

Submitted on Tue, 08/28/2012 - 01:47 

Submitted by anonymous user: [98.250.111.5] Submitted values are: 

Topic or category: Energy Efficiency 

Affiliation: General Public 

Subject: New HVAC standards 

Message: 

Hello, 

I am the president of my condominium association in Ann Arbor, Michigan. We are a converted 

apartment complex, and our buildings are composed of all flats, stacked three-high. Our 

furnaces and AC units are in furnace closets accessible from the patio or balcony of each 

unit. Since we are a condominium complex, the furnaces are owned individually by each 

resident. 

The new HVAC efficiency standards set to go into effect on May 1, 2013 will cause a lot of 

problems for us. Due to the quasi-outdoor location of our furnaces, we have never been able 

to use high-efficiency furnaces. (Much to my regret.) The condensation associated with 

high-efficiency units would freeze the lines, and there are special venting requirements for 

high-efficiency units that we cannot accommodate. When the new standards go into effect next 

year, we will be in a real pickle. Our residents buying new furnaces will only be able to 

purchase units that will not work in our particular set of circumstances. What recourse do 

we have? 

Thank you, 

David Gurk 

President, Walden Hills II Condominium Association Ann Arbor, MI Do you want a reply: Yes How 

should we respond? Email Emailaddress:dgurk@hotmail.com 

The results of this submission may be viewed at: 

http://energy.gov/node/268177/submission/39853 

1
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5740 Tracheal/bronchial differential ventilation tube. ( a ) *Identification.* A tracheal/bronchial differential ventilation tube is a device used to isolate the left or the right lung of a patient for anesthesia or pulmonary function testing.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
March 31, 2015 The Honorable Anthony 

### R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 The Honorable John F. Kerry Secretary of State US Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 Secretaries Foxx and Kerry, as well as Members ofthe Minnesota Congressional Delegation: 

# BRAINEJU> www.ci.brainerd.mn.us

I am writingtodayto enlistyour help in addressing the unfair airline industry practices that emanate from the Persian Gulf. While Brainerd Minnesota may be a great distance from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, we are nonetheless concerned forwhat it means ifa competitive balance is not brought back to Open Skies agreements with the governments ofthese two Gulf neighbors. Since 2004, Qatar and UAE have poured $42 billion in excessive subsidies and other benefits intothree stateowned carriers: QatarAirways, Etihad Airways and Emirate Airline. Such unfairsubsidies are counterto the basis ofOpen Skies policy, and specifically out ofbounds ofthe agreements thatthe two countries signed a decade ago. Such massive subsidies truly provide disproportionate advantages to the Gulfairlines as they reportedly lookto expand service intothe U.S. market. This expansion would come at a terrible expense ofAmerican jobs. According to the Partnership for Open and Fair Skies, the loss ofjobs would be over800 for every international roundtrip lost orforgone by a U.S. carrier. The US airlines have been excellent partners to us in the upper Midwest. The Brainerd Lakes Regional Airport is served by Delta and others who provide an invaluable service bringing many individualsto our Brainerd Lakes area; a majortourist destination. The Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport is home to a major Delta hub that serves as the majorairportfor six neighboring states. I honestlybelieve thatthe U.S. airlines and the 11 million workers deserve an opportunityto compete on a level playing field with others in the marketplace. Everyone should be able to compete in that marketplace. I hope you'll agree with me thatthere needs to be fair competition without afew airlines receiving such a huge subsidized economic advantage. We need to bringthe governments ofQatar and UAE back to the table to address the significant subsidies that are distortingthe current market. We need your assistance to help give our U.S. carriers the fairness they deserve to compete with any other airline in the world. Thank you for yourtime and consideration. Sincerely, City of Brainerd 1 

## 1. 1**~**

## &~,;:~**fa'~;** E. Wallin, Mayor 

### City of Brainerd, 501 Laurel Street, Brainerd, MN 56401 218-828-2307