alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014351EN.01002402.xml

| 6.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/24

---

Action brought on 14 August 2014 — Fútbol Club Barcelona v OHIM — Kule (KULE)

(Case T-614/14)

2014/C 351/31

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fútbol Club Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kule LLC (New York, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 June 2014 given in Case R 2375/2013-4. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 June 2014 given in Case R 2375/2013-4.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘KULE’ for goods in Classes 14, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 9 917 097

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish trademarks and well-known trade mark for the word ‘CULE’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of the Coal Hill, Hartman, and Clarksville 
quadrangles, Johnson County and vicinity, Arkansas

#### Professional Paper 536-C

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp536C 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Pan
International Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiary - Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements for the period ending Mar. 31, 1999 and for the years ended Dec. 31,
1998 and Dec. 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Form 10-QSB for 1st Quarter, 1999 ended March 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,065,896
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,065,896)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    23
<PP&E>                                         100,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 853,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          677,917
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,758
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,281,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   853,717
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,016
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (64,016)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (64,016)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.008)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.008)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-8988-5]


Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-1399 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 02/23/2010 
Through 02/23/2010 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9;

Notice

    In accordance with Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is 
required to make its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies 
public. Historically, EPA has met this mandate by publishing weekly 
notices of availability of EPA comments, which includes a brief summary 
of EPA's comment letters, in the Federal Register. Since February 2008, 
EPA has been including its comment letters on EISs on its Web site at: 
http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html. Including the entire 
EIS comment letters on the Web site satisfies the Section 309(a) 
requirement to make EPA's comments on EISs available to the public. 
Accordingly, after March 31, 2010, EPA will discontinue the publication 
of this notice of availability of EPA comments in the Federal Register.
EIS No. 20100057, Final EIS, NHTSA, 00, Corporate Average Fuel Economy 
(CAFE) Standards Passenger Car and Light Trucks Model Years 2012-2016, 
To Reduce National Energy Consumption by Increasing the Fuel Economy of 
Passenger Car and Light Trucks sold in the United States, 
Implementation, Wait Period Ends: 04/01/2010, Contact: Angel Jackson 
202-366-0154.

    Dated: February 26, 2010.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2010-4389 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1017 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize grants for the water resources research and 

technology institutes established under the Water Resources Research Act of 1984. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Water Resources Re5 search Act Amendments of 2005’’. 
2 

S 1017 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. 

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

3 104(f) of the Water Resources Research Act of 1984 (42 

4 U.S.C. 10303(f)) is amended— 

5 (1) in the subsection header, by striking ‘‘IN

6 GENERAL’’; 

7 (2) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be 

10 appropriated to carry out this section, to remain 

11 available until expended— 

12 ‘‘(A) $12,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

13 2006 through 2008; and 

14 ‘‘(B) $13,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

15 2009 and 2010.’’; and 

16 (3) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(2) Any’’ and 

17 inserting the following: 

18 ‘‘(2) FAILURE TO OBLIGATE FUNDS.—Any’’. 

19 (b) ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS WHERE RE20 SEARCH FOCUSED ON WATER PROBLEMS OF INTERSTATE

21 NATURE.—Section 104(g) of the Water Resources Re22 search Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303(g)) is amended— 

23 (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para24 graph (4); and 

25 (2) in paragraph (1)— 

26 (A) in the first sentence— 
3 

S 1017 RFH 

1 (i) by striking ‘‘(1) There’’ and insert2 ing the following: 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There’’; and 

4 (ii) by striking ‘‘$3,000,000 for fiscal 

5 year 2001, $4,000,000 for each of fiscal 

6 years 2002 and 2003, and $6,000,000 for 

7 each of fiscal years 2004 and 2005’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘$6,000,000 for each of fiscal 

9 years 2006 through 2008 and $7,000,000 

10 for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010’’; 

11 (B) in the second sentence, by striking 

12 ‘‘Such’’ and inserting the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) NON-FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS.—The’’; 

14 and 

15 (C) in the third sentence, by striking 

16 ‘‘Funds’’ and inserting the following: 

17 ‘‘(3) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds’’. 

Passed the Senate September 27, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1790 Nearpoint ruler. ( a ) *Identification.* A nearpoint ruler is a device calibrated in centimeters intended to measure the nearpoint of convergence (the point to which the visual lines are directed when convergence is at its maximum).
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 33355, Sept. 2, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 35605, Sept. 14, 1988; 53 FR 40825, Oct. 18, 1988; 66 FR 38812, July 25, 2001]
Order entered November 29, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01144
- CR
ERNEST EDWARD GAINES , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 28 2nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 05
- 56570
- S



### O RDER Before the Court is Ernest Gaines’s November 21, 2016 Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief. Gaines tendered his appellate brief contemporaneously with the motion. On November 17, 2016, on our own motion, we ordered Gaines, throug h counsel, to file his brief by November 28, 2016. Accordingly, we DENY Gaines’s November 21, 2016 motion as moot.
We DIRECT the Clerk to file the brief tendered by Gaine s on November 21, 2016.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
Exhibit 10(a)



                      AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
            AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
               BY AND BETWEEN RICHARD M. FRANK AND
                     SHOWBIZ PIZZA TIME, INC.


          This Amendment No. 2 (the "Amendment") is executed as
of this 3rd day of March, 1997, by and between Richard M. Frank
("Employee") and ShowBiz Pizza Time, Inc., a Kansas corporation
("Employer").


                            RECITALS:


     WHEREAS, on April 14, 1993, Employee and Employer entered
into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement,
which was effective as of January 2, 1993 (the "Agreement"),
whereby the Employee agreed to serve as Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Employer through the last day of
the fiscal year of the Employer ending on or about December 31,
1997; and
     
     WHEREAS, Employer desires to amend said Agreement to
increase the automobile allowance for Employee:

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended in the
     following respects:

     Paragraph 8 is hereby amended to read as follows:

          "8.   Automobile.  Employer shall pay to
          Employee the sum of One thousand Three
          Hundred Dollars ($1,300.00) per month
          (subject to adjustment from time to time in
          direct proportion to generally applicable
          adjustment by the Company to its automobile
          allowances) to reimburse Employee for the use
          of Employee's automobile in the performance
          of his duties under this Agreement and
          Employer shall further pay directly or by
          reimbursement to Employee (as Employer and
          Employee may from time to time agree) the
          premiums upon a policy of collision and
          liability insurance covering such automobile. 
          All other costs and expenses incurred in the
          operation and maintenance of Employee's
          automobile, including but not limited to the
          cost of all fuel, oil, maintenance and
          repairs, shall be paid solely by Employee."

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment
No. 2 effective as of January 1, 1997.

                              EMPLOYER:
                              -------- 

                              SHOWBIZ PIZZA TIME, INC.
                              By: /s/ Michael H. Magusiak       
                              ---------------------------


                              EMPLOYEE:
                              ---------

                              By:   /s/  Richard M. Frank   
                              ----------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.5300 DC-defibrillator (including paddles). ( a ) *Low-energy DC-defibrillator* — ( 1 ) *Identification.* A low-energy DC-defibrillator is a device that delivers into a 50 ohm test load an electrical shock of a maximum of 360 joules of energy used for defibrillating (restoring normal heart rhythm) the atria or ventricles of the heart or to terminate other cardiac arrhythmias. This generic type of device includes low energy defibrillators with a maximum electrical output of less than 360 joules of energy that are used in pediatric defibrillation or in cardiac surgery. The device may either synchronize the shock with the proper phase of the electrocardiogram or may operate asynchronously. The device delivers the electrical shock through paddles placed either directly across the heart or on the surface of the body.
( 2 ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
( b ) *High-energy DC-defibrillator* — ( 1 ) *Identification.* A high-energy DC-defibrillator is a device that delivers into a 50 ohm test load an electrical shock of greater than 360 joules of energy used for defibrillating the atria or ventricles of the heart or to terminate other cardiac arrhythmias. The device may either synchronize the shock with the proper phase of the electrocardiogram or may operate asynchronously. The device delivers the electrical shock through paddles placed either directly across the heart or on the surface of the body.
( 2 ) *Classification.* Class III (premarket approval).
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before December 26, 1996 for any DC-defibrillator (including paddles) described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before December 26, 1996 been found to be substantially equivalent to a DC-defibrillator (including paddles) described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other DC-defibrillator (including paddles) described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall have an approved PMA or declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[45 FR 7907, Feb. 5, 1980, as amended at 52 FR 17737, May 11, 1987; 61 FR 50706, Sept. 27, 1996]
# C_2014112EN.01005302.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/53

---

Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Frucona Košice v Commission

(Case T-103/14)

2014/C 112/69

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Frucona Košice a.s. (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: K. Lasok, QC, B. Hartnett, Barrister, O. Geiss, lawyer, and J. Holmes, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul the Commission decision C (2013) 6261 dated 16 October 2013 on State Aid No SA.18211 (C 25/2005) (ex NN 21/2005) addressed to the Slovak Republic; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission decision C (2013) 6261 dated 16 October 2013 on State Aid No SA.18211 (C 25/2005) (ex NN 21/2005) addressed to the Slovak Republic; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision was adopted in breach of the rights of defence. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision was adopted in breach of the rights of defence.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in law in recital 83 of the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in law in recital 83 of the contested decision.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in fact and law in concluding that it would have been more advantageous for the Slovak tax authorities to initiate a bankruptcy procedure (recitals 88-119 of the contested decision). |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in fact and law in concluding that it would have been more advantageous for the Slovak tax authorities to initiate a bankruptcy procedure (recitals 88-119 of the contested decision).

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in concluding that the tax execution procedure would have led to a higher return than under the arrangement procedure. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in concluding that the tax execution procedure would have led to a higher return than under the arrangement procedure.

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience.
    Date: March 24, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Deborah L. Lewis, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4183, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-408-9129, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#620e07150b11060700220111104c0c0b0a4c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b474e5c42584f4e496b48585905454243054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 2, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-5018 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.9050 Blood bank supplies. ( a ) *Identification.* Blood bank supplies are general purpose devices intended for in vitro use in blood banking. This generic type of device includes products such as blood bank pipettes, blood grouping slides, blood typing tubes, blood typing racks, and cold packs for antisera reagents. The device does not include articles that are licensed by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research of the Food and Drug Administration.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls).
[45 FR 60638, Sept. 12, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 11253, Apr. 6, 1988]