alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.1402(a)-1 Definition of net earnings from self-employment. ( a ) Subject to the special rules set forth in §§ 1.1402(a)-3 to 1.1402(a)-17, inclusive, and to the exclusions set forth in §§ 1.1402(c)-2 to 1.1402(c)-7, inclusive, the term “net earnings from self-employment” means: ( 1 ) The gross income derived by an individual from any trade or business carried on by such individual, less the deductions allowed by chapter 1 of the Code which are attributable to such trade or business, plus
( 2 ) His distributive share (whether or not distributed), as determined under section 704, of the income (or minus the loss), described in section 702(a)(9) and as computed under section 703, from any trade or business carried on by any partnership of which he is a member.
( b ) Gross income derived by an individual from a trade or business includes payments received by him from a partnership of which he is a member for services rendered to the partnership or for the use of capital by the partnership, to the extent the payments are determined without regard to the income of the partnership. However, such payments received from a partnership not engaged in a trade or business within the meaning of section 1402(c) and § 1.1402(c)-1 do not constitute gross income derived by an individual from a trade or business. See section 707(c) and the regulations thereunder, relating to guaranteed payments to a member of a partnership for services or the use of capital. See also section 706(a) and the regulations thereunder, relating to the taxable year of the partner in which such guaranteed payments are to be included in computing taxable income.
( c ) Gross income derived by an individual from a trade or business includes gross income received (in the case of an individual reporting income on the cash receipts and disbursements method) or accrued (in the case of an individual reporting income on the accrual method) in the taxable year from a trade or business even though such income may be attributable in whole or in part to services rendered or other acts performed in a prior taxable year as to which the individual was not subject to the tax on self-employment income.
[T.D. 6691, 28 FR 12796, Dec. 3, 1963, as amended by T.D. 7333, 39 FR 44445, Dec. 24, 1974]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30262

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LAWRENCE J. CRANDLE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:10-CR-35-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Lawrence J. Crandle, Jr., has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Crandle has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed

to allow consideration at this time of Crandle’s claim of ineffective assistance of

counsel; such a claim generally “‘cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the

claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 28, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30262 Document: 00511616288 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2011
No. 11-30262

to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.’” United States v. Cantwell,

470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (quoting United States v. Pierce, 959 F.2d

1297, 1301 (5th Cir. 1992)). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Crandle’s response. We concur

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-30262 Document: 00511616288 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         513,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,115,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (259,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    815,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,246,000
<PP&E>                                       2,699,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 764,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,341,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,068,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,376,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,341,000
<SALES>                                      1,753,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,753,000
<CGS>                                        1,158,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,158,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,446,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (109,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (928,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (928,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 391,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (537,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3044 Resorbable implant for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. ( a ) *Identification.* A resorbable implant for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair is a degradable material that allows for healing of a torn ACL that is biomechanically stabilized by traditional suturing procedures. The device is intended to protect the biological healing process from the surrounding intraarticular environment and not intended to replace biomechanical fixation via suturing. This classification includes devices that bridge or surround the torn ends of a ruptured ACL.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and include the following: ( i ) Post-operative evaluation of knee pain and function; and
( ii ) Durability as assessed by re-tear or re-operation rate.
( 2 ) Animal performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and include the following: ( i ) Device performance characteristics, including resorption and ligament healing at repair site; and
( ii ) Adverse effects as assessed by gross necropsy and histopathology.
( 3 ) Non-clinical testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and include the following: ( i ) Characterization of materials, including chemical composition, resorption profile, and mechanical properties; and
( ii ) Simulated use testing, including device preparation, device handling, compatibility with other ACL repair instrumentation, and user interface.
( 4 ) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 5 ) Performance data must demonstrate the device to be sterile and non-pyrogenic.
( 6 ) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
( 7 ) Labeling must include the following: ( i ) Identification of device materials and specifications;
( ii ) A summary of the clinical performance testing conducted with the device;
( iii ) Instructions for use, including compatibility with other ACL repair instrumentation or devices;
( iv ) Warnings regarding post-operative rehabilitation requirements; and
( v ) A shelf life.
[87 FR 80041, Dec. 29, 2022]
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7985 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to submit to Congress a report on the entrepreneurial challenges facing entrepreneurs with a disability, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7985 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Entrepreneurs with 

3 Disabilities Reporting Act of 2024’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPORT ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP CHALLENGES OF 

5 ENTREPRENEURS WITH DISABILITIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

8 the Small Business Administration shall submit to Con9 gress a report on the challenges that entrepreneurs with 

10 a disability encounter with starting and operating a busi11 ness, including— 

12 (1) an assessment of the challenges and needs 

13 of entrepreneurs with a disability; 

14 (2) a description of the resources and support 

15 that the Small Business Administration provides to 

16 entrepreneurs with a disability; 

17 (3) a description of outreach to entrepreneurs 

18 with a disability by the Small Business Administra19 tion, including by district and regional offices of the 

20 Small Business Administration, small business devel21 opment centers (as defined in section 3(t) of the 

22 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(t))), and wom23 en’s business centers (as defined in section 29(a) of 

24 such Act (15 U.S.C. 656(a))); 

25 (4) a description of any joint efforts between of26 fices of the Small Business Administration or the 
3 

•HR 7985 EH

1 Small Business Administration and other Federal 

2 agencies to advance the goal of supporting the eco3 nomic success of entrepreneurs with a disability; 

4 (5) any deficiencies in the resources and sup5 port described under paragraph (2); 

6 (6) a description of the use of, and access to, 

7 resources of the Administration by entrepreneurs 

8 with a disability; and 

9 (7) any recommendations for legislative actions 

10 that are necessary to address the challenges or needs 

11 of entrepreneurs with a disability that are identified 

12 in the report. 

13 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO.—No additional 

14 amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

15 this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7985 

AN ACT 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business 

poses. preneurs with a disability, and for other purthe entrepreneurial challenges facing entreAdministration to submit to Congress a report on
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****OPIC updates.**
 
SuDoc Number:OP 1.10:

Item Number:0834-W-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001100881
 
**2019- July 2019March       2019
 
**2018- July       2018June 2018May       2018April       2018March       2018January       2018
 
**2017- Review       2017November       2017October       2017September       2017August       2017July       2017June       2017May       2017April       2017March       2017
** 
**2016**- Review 2016November 2016October 2016September 2016August 2016July 2016June 2016May 2016April 2016March 2016 February 2016January 2016
** 
**2015- December 2015November 2015October 2015September 2015August 2015July 2015June 2015May 2015April 2015March 2015February 2015January 2015
 
**2014**- Novr/Dec 2014October 2014Aug/Sepr 2014July 2014June 2014May 2014April 2014March 2014February 2014January 2014
 
**2013**- December 2013November 2013October 2013September 2013August 2013July 2013June 2013May 2013April 2013March 2013February 2013January 2013
 
**2012**- Fall 2012Summer 2012Winter 2012
 
**2011- Fall 2011Summer 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 5, 2020**************
#### Roberts *v.*Roberts.

No. 8752.

March 16, 1932.

Rehearing denied April 15, 1932.

Gilbert, J.

1. A decree for alimony from a sister State, providing for future monthly payments, is such a decree as is enforceable in this State, under the full faith and credit clause of the constitution of the United States, as to such payments as have become- due and remain unpaid at the time of the rendition of the judgment in this State, although the foreign court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of modifying the judgment. *Cureton*v. *Cureton,*132 *Ga.*745 (2) (65 S. E. 65).

2. A judgment of the chancer-y court of the State of Florida, in so far as it relates to the matured and unpaid installments of alimony, -which according to the petition do not appear to have been set aside or modified, is a chose in action and constitutes a debt, and an action can be sustained ■ upon it. *Heakes*v. *Heakes,*157 *Ga.*863, 867 (122 S. E. 777).

3. The petition in this case contained a prayer for judgment based upon such matured and unpaid installments and for ne exeat, and for such remedy alleged a cause of action. The court therefore erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition. *Cureton*v. *Cureton,*supra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*646
      *W. H. Harris*and *George B. Culpepper Jr.,*for plaintiff.

*F. Holmes Johnson*and *J. W. BarneU,*for defendant.
# C_2016111EN.01004201.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/42

---

Order of the General Court of 3 February 2016 — Experience Hendrix v OHIM — JH Licence (Jimi Hendrix)

(Case T-357/14) (1)

1

(2016/C 111/51)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.

1

---
# C_2014361EN.01001002.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/10

---

Order of the General Court of 20 August 2014 — Alsharghawi v Council

(Case T-532/14 R)

((Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya - List of persons and entities to which those measures apply - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency - Weighing of interests))

2014/C 361/13

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bashir Saley Bashir Alsharghawi (Johannesburg, South Africa) (represented by: E. Moutet, lawyer)

Applicant: Bashir Saley Bashir

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and V. Piessevaux, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ 2011 L 58, p. 53) and Council Decision 2011/178/CFSP of 23 March 2011 amending Decision 2011/137/CFSP (OJ 2011 L 78, p. 24) in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from October 31, 2016 through October 29, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 9, 2015 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2015-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 
| Date: January 12,   2018 | John Deere Capital   Corporation       |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                          |                                   |
|                          |                                   |   |
|                          | By                                     | /s/ Steven N.   Owenson |   |
|                          | Steven N. Owenson                      |
|                          | Senior Vice President   and Controller |

 

----
(logo) Rialto CAPITAL

 

 

**2016 Annual Statement ofServicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofAugust 1, 2015 by and among Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage SecuritiesCorp. as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as SpecialServicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Operating Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association as Certificate Administrator and Wells Fargo Bank,National Association as Trustee relating to the Credit Suisse First BostonMortgage Securities Corp., CSAIL 2015-C3 Commercial Mortgage Trust, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C3

**(CSAIL 2015-C3)**

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”), solely with respect to the Charles River PlazaNorth Whole Loan (“Loan”), herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activitiesand performance of such servicing activities solely with respect to the Loanunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2. A review of the servicingactivities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1,2016 to October 13, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) solely withrespect to the Loan in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen conducted under my supervision.

 

3. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement solely withrespect to such Loan, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and ifthere has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any materialrespect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specificallyidentified herein.

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer 

Adam Singer, Managing Director

Date: March 1, 2017
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1825 Rheoencephalograph. ( a ) *Identification.* A rheoencephalograph is a device used to estimate a patient's cerebral circulation (blood flow in the brain) by electrical impedance methods with direct electrical connections to the scalp or neck area.
( b ) *Classification.* Class III (premarket approval).
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before December 26, 1996 for any rheoencephalograph that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before December 26, 1996 been found to be substantially equivalent to a rheoencephalograph that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other rheoencephalograph shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[44 FR 51730, Sept. 4, 1979, as amended at 52 FR 17740, May 11, 1987; 61 FR 50708, Sept. 27, 1996]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File No.: 0-27133

AQUAMOTION, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as it appears in its charter)
NEVADA	                                      88-0333296
(State or jurisdiction of	               (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	     Identification No.)

5757  West Century Boulevard, Suite 340, Los Angeles, California  90045
(Address of Principal Executive Office)	                            (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:	(310)-665-0221

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:  None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:

Class A Common Stock $0.001 Par Value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months ( or such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports) and  (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.	Yes 			No

At the end of the quarter ending 09/30/99 there were 1,000,000 issued and
outstanding shares of the registrants common stock.

There is no active market for the registrant's securities.



PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See attached exhibit

Item 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATION.
Results of Operations
The Company has had no operations during this quarter.

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.
None
Item 2.	Changes in Securities
None
Item 3.	Default Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4.	Submission of matters To a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5.	Other Information.
None
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 10-Q
(a)	The following documents are filed as part of this report:
            Financial Statements as of September 30, 1999.


Exhibits:

3.1		Articles of Incorporation	               Incorporated by
 		                                           reference The
		                               	  			       Company's Form 10-
			                                           SB/A filed on May 12th,
						                                        2000.


3.2			By-Laws		                             	 Incorporated by
		                                            reference The
						                                        Company's Form 10-
                  			                         SB/A filed on May 12th,
						                                        2000.




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Aquamotion, Inc.



By: /S/
        Kelly Ryan, Secretary