alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: February 14, 2008 | /s/ John P. Manning        
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        | John P. Manning            
|                        | Principal Executive Officer
|                        |                            
|                        |                            
|                        |
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.5720 Water circulating hot or cold pack. ( a ) *Identification.* A water circulating hot or cold pack is a device intended for medical purposes that operates by pumping heated or chilled water through a plastic bag and that provides hot or cold therapy for body surfaces.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 890.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 59231, Nov. 3, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.4400 Electronic metal locator. ( a ) *Identification.* An electronic metal locator is an AC-powered device with probes intended to locate metallic foreign bodies in the eye or eye socket.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
[52 FR 33355, Sept. 2, 1987, as amended at 84 FR 71817, Dec. 30, 2019]
§ 529.1044a Gentamicin solution for infusion. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 50 or 100 milligrams gentamicin sulfate.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See Nos. 000061, 016592, 054771, 058005, 058198, 061133, and 069043 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Infuse 2 to 2.5 grams per day for 3 to 5 days during estrus.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For control of bacterial infections of the uterus (metritis) and as an aid in improving conception in mares with uterine infections caused by bacteria sensitive to gentamicin.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[71 FR 51727, Aug. 31, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 17597, Mar. 22, 2013; 78 FR 21060, Apr. 9, 2013; 79 FR 10973, Feb. 27, 2014; 83 FR 48947, Sept. 28, 2018; 84 FR 8974, Mar. 13, 2019; 86 FR 14821, Mar. 19, 2021; 88 FR 55567, Aug. 16, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.5145 Medical bassinet. ( a ) *Identification.* A medical bassinet is a prescription device that is a small bed intended for use with pediatric patients, generally from birth to approximately 5 months of age. It is intended for medical purposes for use in a nursery, labor and delivery unit, or patient room, but may also be used outside of traditional health care settings. A medical bassinet is a non-powered device that consists of two components: The plastic basket or bed component and a durable frame with wheels, which holds the basket or bed component. The basket or bed component is a box-like structure, generally made of a clear, high impact-resistant plastic material, with an open top and four stationary walls to hold the pediatric patient. The frame can include drawers, shelving, or cabinetry that provides space to hold infant care items. The wheels or casters allow the bassinet to transport the infant throughout the care setting.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 880.9. The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The manufacturer must conduct performance testing to determine material compatibility with cleansing products labeled to clean the device. Testing must demonstrate that the cleaning instructions provided by the manufacturer do not cause crazing, cracking, or deterioration of the device;
( 2 ) Manufacturers shall conduct performance testing to ensure the mechanical and structural stability of the bassinet under expected conditions of use, including transport of patients in the bassinet. Testing must demonstrate that failures such as wheel or caster breakage do not occur and that the device does not present a tipping hazard due to any mechanical failures under expected conditions of use; and
( 3 ) Each device must have the following label(s) affixed: ( i ) Adequate instructions for users to care for, maintain, and clean the bassinet; and
( ii ) A warning label on at least two sides of the plastic basket or bed component with the following language in text of at least 9 millimeters in height:
WARNING: To avoid tipping hazards of this device, make sure that the basket or bed component sits firmly in the base and that all doors, drawers, and casters are secure. [81 FR 91737, Dec. 19, 2016]
# C_2021252EN.01003501.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/35

---

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2021 — Pavlides v Commission and ECB

(Case T-150/14) (1)

(2021/C 252/47)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber, Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 159, 26.5.2014.

---
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.2050 Medical image management and processing system. ( a ) *Identification.* A medical image management and processing system is a device that provides one or more capabilities relating to the review and digital processing of medical images for the purposes of interpretation by a trained practitioner of disease detection, diagnosis, or patient management. The software components may provide advanced or complex image processing functions for image manipulation, enhancement, or quantification that are intended for use in the interpretation and analysis of medical images. Advanced image manipulation functions may include image segmentation, multimodality image registration, or 3D visualization. Complex quantitative functions may include semi-automated measurements or time-series measurements.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std., Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) Test Pattern).
[63 FR 23387, Apr. 29, 1998, as amended at 86 FR 20284, Apr. 19, 2021]
#### § 56.124 Actions alternative or additional to disqualification.

Disqualification of an IRB or of an institution is independent of, and neither in lieu of nor a precondition to, other proceedings or actions authorized by the act. The Food and Drug Administration may, at any time, through the Department of Justice institute any appropriate judicial proceedings (civil or criminal) and any other appropriate regulatory action, in addition to or in lieu of, and before, at the time of, or after, disqualification. The agency may also refer pertinent matters to another Federal, State, or local government agency for any action that that agency determines to be appropriate.
# C_2014361EN.01002401.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/24

---

Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Laverana v OHIM (ORGANIC PROTEIN RICH PLANT COMPLEX FROM OUR OWN PRODUCTION)

(Case T-609/14)

2014/C 361/36

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laverana GmbH & Co. KG (Wennigsen, Germany) (represented by J. Wachinger, M. Zöbisch and D. Chatterjee, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 June 2014 in case R 123/2014-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 June 2014 in case R 123/2014-4;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark which contains the word elements ‘ORGANIC PROTEIN RICH PLANT COMPLEX FROM OUR OWN PRODUCTION’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 9 22  986

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refused the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Misuse of powers by a decision on the basis of competition policy considerations |
| --- | --- |

—

Misuse of powers by a decision on the basis of competition policy considerations

---
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

69–011 2017

115th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–32 

A LETTER CERTIFYING THAT THE CONDITIONS OF 

SECTION 135(d)(6) OF THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT 

OF 1954, AS AMENDED, HAVE BEEN MET 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE 

TRANSMITTING

A LETTER CERTIFYING THAT THE CONDITIONS OF SECTION 

135(d)(6) OF THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954, AS AMENDED, 

INCLUDING AS AMENDED BY THE IRAN NUCLEAR AGREEMENT 

REVIEW ACT OF 2015 (PUBLIC LAW 114–17), HAVE BEEN MET 

AS OF APRIL 18, 2017 

APRIL 27, 2017.—Referred jointly to the Committees on Foreign Affairs, 

Financial Services, the Judiciary, Oversight and Government Reform, 

and Ways and Means and ordered to be printed 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE, 

Washington, April 24, 2017. 

Hon. PAUL D. RYAN, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: This letter certifies that the conditions of 

Section 135(d)(6) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA), as 

amended, including as amended by the Iran Nuclear Agreement 

Review Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–17), enacted May 22, 2015, are 

met as of April 18, 2017. 

Notwithstanding, Iran remains a leading state sponsor of terror 

through many platforms and methods. President Donald J. Trump 

has directed a National Security Council-led interagency review of 

the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that will evaluate 

whether suspension of sanctions related to Iran pursuant to the 

JCPOA is vital to the national security interests of the United 

States. When the interagency review is completed, the administration looks forward to working with Congress on this issue. 

Sincerely, 

REX W. TILLERSON, 

Secretary of State. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR
PARTNERS, LLC





The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as special servicer under the applicable
Pooling and Servicing Agreement , hereby certifies, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity
as an officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



|1. |  | I have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under the applicable
Pooling and Servicing Agreement drilling the period commencing on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting
Period”), and the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing
criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company



By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President





















Dated: February 22, 2017



















1601WashingtonAvenue • Suite 700·• Miami
Beach,Florida33139-3164

Telephone:(305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 22, 2015

No. 04-14-00905-CV

ESCONDIDO RESOURCES II, LLC,

Appellant

v.

JUSTAPOR RANCH, L.C.,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CV7-001396-D1

The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On January 22, 2015, and February 24, 2015, we suspended the appellate deadlines in this 

case pending mediation. See 4TH TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. R. 2. However, on April 21, 2015, 

the appellant notified this court that the mediation was unsuccessful. 

We, therefore, ORDER the appellate deadlines reinstated. The clerk’s record and the 

reporter’s record have been filed. Accordingly, appellant’s brief is due thirty (30) days from the 

date of this order.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Mischler et al. v. Springfield Township School District et al.

(No. 2)

*S. Y. Rossiter,*for complainants.

*Bryan, Joslin & Bryan,*for respondents.

December 19, 1951.

Evans, P. J.,

This matter is before us on exceptions to a decree of the chancellor dismissing a bill in equity seeking an injunction to restrain defendants from functioning or acting as a consolidated union school district: 80 D. *&*C. 176.

We affirm the chancellor’s findings of fact and conclusions of law without repetition, but feel in view of the earnest argument on the exceptions filed that some further discussion in support of the decree entered is in order.

The Act of May 29, 1931, P. L. 243, outlines the procedure which must be followed, whenever a new school district is to be created by: (a) The creation of a new city, borough, township, or independent school district; (b) when an existing district of the fourth class is affected by the annexation to a city or borough or township of territory included within a school district of the fourth class; (c) the consolidation of two or more districts as a union district. The Act of May 26,1933, P. L. 1067, applies specifically and exclusively *391to procedure to be followed in (c) above, where consolidation of two or more districts is to be had.

The Act of 1931, supra, remained in force as to situations described in (a) and (b) above, and was therefore necessarily considered and applied in the case of Bethlehem School District Appeal, 351 Pa. 433, because the facts in that case come within classification (b). The procedure under the Act of 1933, supra, was followed in this case, and that act provides: “ . . . whenever any union district shall be formed as" *herein frovided,*such district shall become a union school district on the first Monday in July after it has been formed.”

It is conceded that both acts here discussed stem from and follow other amendments to the Act of May 18,1911, P. L. 309, entitled an act “To establish a public school system in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania”. The Statutory Construction Act of May 28, 1937, P. L. 1019, 46 PS §575 provides “whenever two or more amendments to the same provision of a law are enacted at the same or different sessions, one amendment overlooking and making no reference to the other or others, the amendments shall be construed together, if possible, and effect be given to each. If the amendments be irreconcilable, the latest in date of final enactment shall prevail from the time it becomes effective”.

Here there is a positive repugnancy between provisions of separate laws enacted at different sessions of the legislature and the earlier provision is impliedly repealed: Rankin v. Chester Municipal Authority, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 438.

In our opinion, the School District of the Township of Springfield is an effective municipal body functioning legally as of the first Monday in July 1949, after an affirmative electoral vote of the people and the approval of the Department of Public Instruction.

*392*Final Decree*

Now, to wit, December 19,1951, the exceptions filed June 19, 1951, are dismissed, and the bill is dismissed at the cost of plaintiffs.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 42 (Thursday, March 4, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9886-9887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Methane Hydrate Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Methane Hydrate 
Advisory Committee. Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Friday, March 26, 2010, 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. (Eastern Daylight 
Time).

ADDRESSES: TMS, Inc., 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW., Suite 1500, 
Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edith Allison, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 
202-586-1023.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Methane Hydrate 
Advisory Committee is to provide advice on potential applications of 
methane hydrate to the Secretary of Energy, and assist in developing 
recommendations and priorities for the Department of Energy Methane 
Hydrate Research and Development Program.

Tentative Agenda

2:45 p.m.-3 p.m. Registration
3 p.m.-3:15 p.m. Welcome and Introductions
3:15 p.m.-3:45 p.m. Discussion of the Plans for FY2011 Gas Hydrate R&D 
in the Basic Energy Sciences Program in the Office of Science
3:45 p.m.-4:45 p.m. Preparation of Comments and Recommendations to the 
Secretary of Energy Regarding Moving Gas Hydrate R&D from the Office of 
Fossil Energy to the Office of Science
4:45 p.m.-5 p.m. Final Announcements and Adjourn

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Chairman of the Committee will conduct the meeting to facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. If you would like to file a written 
statement with the Committee, you may do so either before or after the 
meeting. If you would like to make oral statements regarding any of the 
items on the agenda, you should contact Edith Allison at the address or 
telephone number listed above. You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least five business days prior to the meeting, and 
reasonable provisions will be made to include the presentation on

[[Page 9887]]

the agenda. Public comment will follow the 10 minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days at the Freedom of Information Public 
Reading Room, Room 1G-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on February 26, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-4519 Filed 3-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P