alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 681 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7776 

[Report No. 118–834] 

To amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to expend amounts in the Colorado River Dam fund, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Ms. LEE of Nevada (for herself, Mr. AMODEI, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. TITUS, 

Mr. CISCOMANI, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. GOSAR, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. STANTON, 

and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 10, 2024 

Additional sponsor: Mr. CALVERT

DECEMBER 10, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7776 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act to authorize 

the Secretary of the Interior to expend amounts in the 

Colorado River Dam fund, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7776 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Hoover Dam 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND AMOUNTS. 

7 Section 2 of the Act of December 21, 1928 (43 

8 U.S.C. 617, et seq.; commonly known as the ‘‘Boulder 

9 Canyon Project Act’’), is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following: 

11 ‘‘(f) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 

12 expend moneys in the fund, including moneys in account 

13 XXXR5656P1, that were and hereafter are recovered on 

14 a non-reimbursable basis, for any authorized activity, in15 cluding operations, maintenance, investigation and clean16 up actions, and capital improvements, within the Boulder 

17 Canyon Project at Hoover Dam or on land used for the 

18 construction and operation of the Hoover Dam, subject 

19 to the review and approval of the Boulder Canyon Project 

20 contractors as identified in the Hoover Power Allocation 

21 Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–72).’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 681 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7776 

[Report No. 118–834] 

A BILL 

To amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act to aufor other purposes. amounts in the Colorado River Dam fund, and thorize the Secretary of the Interior to expend 

DECEMBER 10, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1360 Visual field laser instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* A visual field laser instrument is an AC-powered device intended to provide visible laser radiation that produces an interference pattern on the retina to evaluate retinal function.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7989 

AN ACT 

To provide for a memorandum of understanding between 

the Small Business Administration and the National 

Council on Disability to increase employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7989 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the 

3 ‘‘ThinkDIFFERENTLY About Disability Employment 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO INCREASE 

6 EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVID7 UALS WITH DISABILITIES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Small 

9 Business Administration, in consultation with the Chair 

10 of the National Council on Disability, shall— 

11 (1) provide assistance to individuals with dis12 abilities who desire to become entrepreneurs or to be 

13 self-employed; 

14 (2) help individuals with disabilities find em15 ployment at small business concerns (as defined 

16 under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

17 U.S.C. 632)); 

18 (3) assist small business concerns with hiring 

19 individuals with disabilities and with accessibility 

20 issues applicable to individuals with disabilities. 

21 (b) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING OR AGREE22 MENT.—The Administrator, in consultation with the 

23 Chair, shall carry out and coordinate the activities de24 scribed in subsection (a) by entering into one or more 

25 memoranda of understanding or other appropriate agree26 ments. 
3 

•HR 7989 EH

1 (c) OUTREACH AND EDUCATION.—In carrying out 

2 the activities described in subsection (a), the Adminis3 trator, in consultation with the Chair, shall conduct out4 reach and education about such activities. 

5 (d) REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in con7 sultation with the Chair, shall submit to Congress a report 

8 on activities carried out pursuant to any memorandum or 

9 agreement described in subsection (b) that includes the 

10 following: 

11 (1) A description of how the Administrator, in 

12 consultation with the Chair, carried out such activi13 ties. 

14 (2) An analysis of opportunities to expand the 

15 technical capabilities of the Small Business Adminis16 tration in carrying out such activities. 

17 (3) A description of achievements under any 

18 such memorandum or agreement. 

19 (4) A description of the plans of the Adminis20 trator, in consultation with the Chair, to continue 

21 activities to expand employment opportunities for in22 dividuals with disabilities. 
4 

•HR 7989 EH

1 SEC. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO. 

2 No additional amounts are authorized to be appro3 priated to carry out this Act or the amendments made 

4 by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7989 

AN ACT 

To provide for a memorandum of understanding beabilities, and for other purposes. ployment opportunities for individuals with dis- National Council on Disability to increase em- tween the Small Business Administration and the
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.4

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
                                                           -----------------------------------------
                                                             NUMBER         PERCENT       EQUIVALENT
                                                           OF SHARES      OUTSTANDING       SHARES
                                                           ---------      -----------       ------
<S>                                                       <C>             <C>           <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                                    2,300,000       100.00%         2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                                 1,316,931        85.05%         1,120,066
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock              15,310,943       100.00%        15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                            11,242,857       100.00%        11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                             4,323,874       100.00%         4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                              6,000,000       100.00%         6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                            (6,588)       10.96%              (722)
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued                145,737        81.88%           119,333
   Warrants Exercised                                        130,513        63.75%            83,208
                                                        ------------                    ------------
                                                          40,764,267                      40,499,559

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                       40,499,559

NET LOSS                                                                                ($99,866,909)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                            ($2.47)
                                                                                        ============
</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133913 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133913 

 COA: 272950 

Kent CC: 01-010775-FC 

RONALD CLEAVE DOUGLAS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Del Norte Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Crescent City, California. The committee meeting is authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purposes of the meeting is orientating new committee members to the Secure Rural Schools Act, Federal Advisory Committees Act, and guidelines for Title II and receive public comment on the meeting subjects and proceedings.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 6, 2010, from 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Del Norte County Unified School District, Board Room, 301 West Washington Boulevard, Crescent City, California 95531.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Julie Ranieri, Committee Coordinator, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95503;  (707) 441-3673; e-mail                         *jranieri@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Welcome and Committee introductions; (2) Federal Advisory Committee Act overview; (3) review of Secure Rural Schools Act and discussion of requirements related to Title II funding; (4) discussion of Committee member and Designated Federal Official roles and (5) review operational guidelines; (6) selection of RAC Chair; (7) next meeting purpose, location, and date; (8) and receive public comment. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: March 2, 2010.

Tyrone Kelley,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-4928 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1860 Radiographic film/cassette changer. ( a ) *Identification.* A radiographic film/cassette changer is a device intended to be used during a radiologic procedure to move a radiographic film or cassette between x-ray exposures and to position it during the exposure.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 84 FR 71819, Dec. 30, 2019]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DEVONTE DURIL TRICE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D17-1713 and 4D17-1714 

[October 11, 2018]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

50-2013-CF-007017-AXXX-MB and 50-2013-CF-007018 AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina 

Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 830.40 Use and discontinuation of a device identifier. ( a ) Only one device identifier from any particular system for the issuance of unique device identifiers (UDIs) may be used to identify a particular version or model of a device. A particular version or model may be identified by UDIs from two or more systems for the issuance of UDIs.
( b ) A device identifier shall be used to identify only one version or model.
( c ) In the event that a version or model of a device is discontinued, its device identifier may not be reassigned to another device. If a discontinued version or model is re-introduced and no changes have been made that would require the use of a new device identifier, the device identifier that was previously in use may be used to identify the device.
( d ) In the event that an issuing agency relinquishes or does not renew its accreditation, you may continue to use a previously issued UDI until such time as § 830.50 requires you to assign a new device identifier.
[78 FR 58825, Sept. 24, 2013]
§ 1.1249-1 Gain from certain sales or exchanges of patents, etc., to foreign corporations. ( a ) *General rule.* Section 1249 provides that if gain is recognized from the sale or exchange after December 31, 1962, of a patent, an invention, model, or design (whether or not patented), a copyright, a secret formula or process, or any other similar property right (not including property such as goodwill, a trademark, or a trade brand) to any foreign corporation by any United States person (as defined in section 7701(a)(30)) which controls such foreign corporation, and if such gain would (but for the provisions of section 1249) be gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset or of property described in section 1231, then such gain shall be considered as gain from the sale or exchange of property which is neither a capital asset nor property described in section 1231. Section 1249 applies only to gain recognized in taxable years beginning after December 31, 1962.
( b ) *Control.* For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the term *control* means, with respect to any foreign corporation, the ownership, directly or indirectly, of stock possessing more than 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the rules for determining ownership of stock provided by section 958 (a) and (b), and the principles for determining percentage of total combined voting power owned by United States shareholders provided by paragraphs (b) and
( c ) of § 1.957-1, shall apply.
[T.D. 6765, 29 FR 14879, Nov. 3, 1964]
#### Best *v.*The State.

[No. 19,114.

Filed June 8, 1900.]

Criminal *Law.*— Larceny.—Felonious *Intent.*— Jt is not necessary, to constitute the crime of larceny, that the taker should have intended to appropriate the property taken to his own use. *p. 46.*

*Same.*— Larceny.—Felonious *Intent.*— An instruction in a prosecution for larceny that to entitle defendant to an acquittal the jury must be satisfied from the .evidence that the felonious intent did not exist is erroneous, *p. 47.*

Prom the Marion Criminal Court.

*Reversed.*

*E. C. Ryan*and *Frank P. Hendricks,*for appellant.

*W. L. Taylor,*Attorney-General, *Merrill Moores*and *C. C. Hadley,*for State.

Monks, J.

— There were three counts in the indictment against appellant. The first for unlawfully entering a dwelling-house in the daytime and attempting to commit larceny; the second for unlawfully breaking into and entering a dwelling-house in the daytime with intent to commit larceny; the third for petit larceny.

The jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of the crime of petit larceny charged in the third count of the indictment. The assignment of errors calls in question the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

It is insisted that the court erred in refusing to give instruction six requested by appellant. Said instruction stated, as one of the essential elements of the crime of larceny, that the taking must be with the felonious intent existing at the time in the mind of the taker to appropriate the property taken to his own use. It is not necessary, to constitute the crime of larceny, that the taker should have intended to appropriate the property taken to his own use. Gillett’s Crim. Law (2nd ed.), §§545, 546; 2 Bishop’s Crim. Law, §§842, 843, 846, 847, 848; Desty’s Crim. Law, *47§145j; Clark’s Crim. Law, p. 282; 12 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, 778. The court did not err, therefore, in refusing to give said instruction.

It is urged that the court erred in giving instruction twelve. Said instruction proceeded upon the theory that to entitle the appellant to an acquittal the jury must he satisfied from the evidence that the felonious intent, which is an essential element of each crime charged in the indictment, did not exist. This theory is erroneous. The established rule is that if the jury had a reasonable doubt of the existence of the said felonious intent, the appellant was entitled to an acquittal. It is true that appellant was not found guilty of the offenses charged in the first and second counts of the indictment, but as the instruction was not limited to those counts, it can not be said that the same was harmless. Other objections are urged to said instruction, but it is not necessary to consider the same as said questions may not arise upon another trial.

Judgment reversed, with instructions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial, and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.4350 Cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator. ( a ) *Identification.* A cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenator is a device used to exchange gases between blood and a gaseous environment to satisfy the gas exchange needs of a patient during open-heart surgery.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Guidance for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Oxygenators 510(k) Submissions.”
[45 FR 7907, Feb. 5, 1980, as amended at 52 FR 17737, May 11, 1987; 66 FR 18542, Apr. 10, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1220 Fluorescent scanner. ( a ) *Identification.* A fluorescent scanner is a device intended to measure the induced fluorescent radiation in the body by exposing the body to certain x-rays or low-energy gamma rays. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts and accessories.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5330 Breathing gas mixer. ( a ) *Identification.* A breathing gas mixer is a device intended for use in conjunction with a respiratory support apparatus to control the mixing of gases that are to be breathed by a patient.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
# C_2015381EN.01004001.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/40

---

Order of the General Court of 21 September 2015 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-849/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Annual assessment - Internal rules - Appeals procedure - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 381/47)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Nuvoli and E. Raimond, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 18 November 2014 in De Nicola v EIB (F-59/09 RENV, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:248), and seeking that that judgment be set aside.

De Nicola

EIB

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.

1

---