alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 74.1327 D&C Red No. 27. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive D&C Red No. 27 is principally 2′,4′,5′,7′-tetrabromo-4,5,6,7-tetrachlorofluorescein (CAS Reg. No. 13473-26-2). The color additive is manufactured by brominating 4,5,6,7-tetrachlorofluorescein with elemental bromine. The 4,5,6,7-tetrachlorofluorescein is manufactured by the acid condensation of resorcinol and tetrachlorophthalic acid or its anhydride. The 4,5,6,7-tetrachlorofluorescein is isolated and partially purified prior to bromination.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with D&C Red No. 27 may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in part 73 of this chapter as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* D&C Red No. 27 shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such impurities may be avoided by current good manufacturing practice: Sum of volatile matter (at 135 °C) and halides and sulfates (calculated as sodium salts), not more than 10 percent. Insoluble matter (alkaline solution), not more than 0.5 percent. Tetrachlorophthalic acid, not more than 1.2 percent. Brominated resorcinol, not more than 0.4 percent. 2,3,4,5-Tetrachloro-6-(3,5-dibromo-2,4-dihydroxybenzoyl) benzoic acid, not more than 0.7 percent. 2′,4′,5′,7′-Tetrabromo-4,5,6,7-tetrachlorofluorescein, ethyl ester, not more than 2 percent. Lower halogenated subsidiary colors, not more than 4 percent. Lead (as Pb), not more than 20 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million. Total color, not less than 90 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* D&C Red No. 27 may be safely used for coloring drugs generally in amounts consistent with current good manufacturing practice.
( d ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Certification.* All batches of D&C Red No. 27 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
[47 FR 42567, Sept. 28, 1982; 47 FR 51106, Nov. 12, 1982]
DURATION OF TEMPORARY APPOINTMENTS BY THE MAYOR.

Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.

#### Edward S. Keefer et al v. State of Ohio, on Relation of James J. Fitzgerald.*

Decided, September 26, 1914.

*Civil Service*— Tenure *of One Appointed to the Municipal Service to Meet an Emergency*— Section 4488.

Under the rules of the Civil Service Commission of Cincinnati the tenure of one appointed to the municipal service to prevent the *475stopping of public business or to meet an extraordinary emergency, continues until such time as tbe commission certifies suitable persons from an appropriate eligible list to fill the vacancy.

*Walter M.*Schoenle, City Solicitor, and *Charles A. Groom,*Assistant City Solicitor, for plaintiff in error.

*Moulinier, Bettman & Hunt,*contra.

Jones, O. B., J.; Jones, E. H., J., concurs; Swing, P. J., dissents.

*

Affirming *State, ex rel Fitzgerald,*v. *Keefer et al,*16 N.P.(N.S.), 145.

By virtue of Section 4488 the mayor had the power and it was his duty to make temporary appointment such as that of the relator below, if it were necessary, to prevent the stoppage of public business or to meet extraordinary exigencies; he had no other right to make such an appointment, and under the general rule of law his official acts must be presumed to be legal. Under Section 74 of the rules of the civil service commission of Cincinnati such temporary appointment continued until such time as the commission could certify persons from an appropriate eligible list to fill the vacancy. It is conceded by both sides that no such list has been certified. The name of the relator was therefore properly upon the payroll, and it was the duty of the civil service commission to give the certificate required by statute to enable the payment of his weekly wages.

The questions raised in the case have been fully discussed in the opinion of the court below, and we agree with the conclusions therein stated and do not deem it necessary to enter upon further discussion of same.

We find no error in the judgment of the court below, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                  |     |                            
|----------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|Date:             |     |                            
|November 14, 2007 | By: | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                  |     |                            
|                  |     | John P. Manning            
|                  |     | Principal Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2015034EN.01004301.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/43

---

Action brought on 4 December 2014 — Bensarsa v European Commission and EDPS

(Case T-791/14)

(2015/C 034/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Faouzi Bensarsa (Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission and European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 25 February 2014 adopted by the Security Directorate; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 25 February 2014 adopted by the Security Directorate;

| — | Annul the decision of 24 October 2014 impliedly adopted by the EDPS; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 24 October 2014 impliedly adopted by the EDPS;

| — | Order the defendants to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendants to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a failure to state reasons for the Commission’s decision of 25 February 2014. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a failure to state reasons for the Commission’s decision of 25 February 2014.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a failure to state reasons for the decision of the EDPS, since it was implied and its reasons could not be deduced either from its context or the decision of 25 February 2014. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a failure to state reasons for the decision of the EDPS, since it was implied and its reasons could not be deduced either from its context or the decision of 25 February 2014.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 (1).
  The applicant argues that the lack of response from the EDPS constitutes a breach of the duty to inform the data subject, provided for in Articles 46(a) and 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 (1).

1

The applicant argues that the lack of response from the EDPS constitutes a breach of the duty to inform the data subject, provided for in Articles 46(a) and 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ 2001 L 8, p. 1).

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5096]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee March 2010 Public Meeting

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to United States Code, Title 31, section 
5135(b)(8)(C), the United States Mint announces the Citizens Coinage 
Advisory Committee (CCAC) public meeting scheduled for March 23, 2010.
    Date: March 23, 2010.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: 8th Floor Boardroom, United States Mint, 801 9th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Subject: Review candidate designs for the 2010 American Eagle 
Platinum Coin Program and discuss the 2009 and 2010 Annual Reports.
    Interested persons should call 202-354-7502 for the latest update 
on meeting time and room location.
    In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 5135, the CCAC:
    <bullet> Advises the Secretary of the Treasury on any theme or 
design proposals relating to circulating coinage, bullion coinage, 
Congressional Gold Medals, and national and other medals.
    <bullet> Advises the Secretary of the Treasury with regard to the 
events, persons, or places to be commemorated by the issuance of 
commemorative coins in each of the five calendar years succeeding the 
year in which a commemorative coin designation is made.
    <bullet> Makes recommendations with respect to the mintage level 
for any commemorative coin recommended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cliff Northup, United States Mint 
Liaison to the CCAC; 801 9th Street, NW.; Washington, DC 20220; or call 
202-354-7200.
    Any member of the public interested in submitting matters for the 
CCAC's consideration is invited to submit them by fax to the following 
number: 202-756-6830.

    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5135(b)(8)(C).

    Dated: March 5, 2010.
Edmund C. Moy,
Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2010-5096 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Morris *v.*First National Bank of Vidalia.

No. 8759.

May 14, 1932.

Beok, P. J.

At tlie conclusion of the evidence in a claim case the court directed a verdict for the claimant, and the plaintiff in fi. fa. excepted. *Held:*

1. The evidence authorized the verdict.

2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial are that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it, is decidedly and strongly against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity. None of the grounds stated “raise the point that the direction of the verdict was erroneous because there were questions of fact that should have been submitted to the jury, therefore no such question is presented for decision.” *Hightower*v. *Hightower,*159 *Ga.*769 (127 S. E. 103); *Gilliard*v. *Johnston,*161 *Ga.*17 (129 S. E. 434).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hines, J., absent for providential cause.*

*849
      *W. B. Kent,*for plaintiff.

*B.*P. *Jackson,*for defendant.
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.1330 Catheter guide wire. ( a ) *Identification.* A catheter guide wire is a coiled wire that is designed to fit inside a percutaneous catheter for the purpose of directing the catheter through a blood vessel.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a torque device that is manually operated, non-patient contacting, and intended to manipulate non-cerebral vascular guide wires, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
[45 FR 7907, Feb. 5, 1980, as amended at 84 FR 71811, Dec. 30, 2019]
EXHIBIT
32.1


SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION





I,
Julie Smolyansky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Lifeway Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for nine
month period ended March 31, 2008:




(1)
Fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
That the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to such Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.




Date:
      May 15, 2008
            /s/
      Julie SmolyanskyJulie
      Smolyansky, Chief Executive Officer,President,
      and Director
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.4

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                         TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
                                                     ------------------------------------------------
                                                      NUMBER                PERCENT        EQUIVALENT
                                                     OF SHARES            OUTSTANDING        SHARES
                                                     ----------           -----------      ----------

<S>                                                  <C>                  <C>              <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                               2,300,000             100.00%         2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                            2,508,997              92.74%         2,326,910
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock         15,310,943             100.00%        15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                       11,242,857             100.00%        11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                        4,323,874             100.00%         4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                         6,000,000             100.00%         6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                       (6,588)            100.00%            (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                               3,789,715              81.15%         3,075,261
   Canadian Transaction                                 714,286              91.53%           653,786
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued           190,651              81.20%           154,817
   Warrants Exercised                                   134,737              98.18%           132,281
                                                     ----------                         -------------
                                                     46,509,472                            45,514,141

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                        45,514,141

NET LOSS                                                                                $(117,800,737)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                      $       (2.59)
                                                                                        =============
</Table>
# C_2017402EN.01003301.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/33

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 28 September 2017 — Vnesheconombank v Council

(Case T-737/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Application for the suspension of operation of measures - No urgency))

(2017/C 402/43)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs (Vnesheconombank) (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: J. Viñals Camallonga, J. Iriarte Ángel and L. Barriola Urruticoechea, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Florindo Gijón and P. Mahnič Bruni, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, S. Pardo Quintillán and D. Gauci, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014, L 229, p. 13) and of Council Regulation (EU) No 83312014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of revised non-foreign overseas per diem rates.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 266. This bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. Bulletin Number 266 is being published in the                         **Federal Register**                         to assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current rates.                    

# DATES:

Effective March 1, 2010.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This document gives notice of revisions in per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 265. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the                     **Federal Register**                     now constitute the only notification of revisions in per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of Defense. For more information or questions about                     *per diem*                     rates, please contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:                
      ( print page 11138)          ( print page 11139)          ( print page 11140)          ( print page 11141)          ( print page 11142)          ( print page 11143)          ( print page 11144)          ( print page 11145)          ( print page 11146)    

Dated: March 4, 2010.

Mitchell S. Bryman,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-5094 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
EXHIBIT 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Affordable Housing II Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                |     |                            
|--------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|Date:           |     |                            
|August 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |     |                            
|                |     | Marc N. Teal               
|                |     | Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.