alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.4

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Trustee in its capacity as Custodian (a Certifying Servicer)
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015 (the Agreement), by and among, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR
Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, here by certifies in accordance with
Section 10.08 of the Agreement:



|A) | A review of such Certifying Servicers activities from September 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the reporting period) and of such Certifying Servicers performance under the Agreement has
been made under such officers supervision and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|B) | That, as to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICASas Trustee in its capacity as Custodian/s/ David CoBY: David CoTitle: DirectorDate: March 1, 2016
39243.

#### WILLIAMS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

The defendant was indicted for the possession of indecent and obscene photographs. Her special and general demurrers to the indictment were overruled and she appealed to the Supreme Court. The defendant, in some grounds of her general demurrers, had sought to have the act declared unconstitutional and after determining that no constitutional question was presented, which would give the Supreme Court jurisdiction of the writ of error, it was transferred to this court. See *Williams v. State,*217 Ga. 312 (122 SE2d 229). The indictment, in so far as is here material, was as follows: “The Grand Jurors . . . charge and accuse Mozell Williams with the offense of: felony (possessing indecent and obscene photographs) for that the said accused, in the County of Fulton and State of Georgia, on the 15th day of November, 1960, with force and arms, did unlawfully possess and have under her control certain indecent and obscene photographs of nude men and nude women exhibiting their sexual organs, some of said photographs showing nude men and nude women engaged in acts of sexual intercourse, some of said photographs showing nude men and nude women engaged in acts' of perversion; said photographs tending to debauch the morals. . .” *Held:*

1. The judgment of the Supreme Court *(Williams v. State,*supra), disposes of the constitutional attacks upon the statute under which the indictment was brought.

2. The indictment alleged that the defendant “did unlawfully possess and have under her control” the described indecent and obscene photographs. While the defendant contends, in support of her demurrers, that the indictment failed to allege that she knowingly possessed such photographs, the above-quoted language was sufficient to allege “possession” and not mere “custody” (see *Henley v. State,*59 Ga. App. 595 (2), 2 SE2d 139), so that knowledge of the images on the photographs was alleged, and such allegation was not a conclusion but an allegation of fact.

3. The allegations of the indictment that some of the pictures showed nude men and nude women “engaged in acts of perversion” was not a conclusion but an allegation of fact which would be a matter of evidence. “The law does not require *227that the evidence should be set opt in the indictment.” *Wellborn v. State,*78 Ga. App. 520 (la) (51 SE2d 588). See also *Dowda v. State,*74 Ga. 12 (2).

Decided January 23, 1962.

*Joseph W.*Love, *Thomas H. Antonion,*for plaintiff in error.

*Paid Webb, Solicitor-General, J. Walter LeCraw, Assistant Solicitor-General,*contra.

4. The indictment was not subject to the defendant’s general demurrer, for it was brought in the language of the act of 1956 (Ga. L. 1956, p. 801; *Code Ann.*§ 26-6301), where applicable, and further described photographs in the defendant’s possession and under her control. “ ‘It is a well-settled rule in this State, that the language of an indictment is to be interpreted liberally in favor of the State.’ *Greene v. State,*109 Ga. 536, 540 (35 SE 97).” *Bond v. State,*104 Ga. App. 627 (1) (122 SE2d 310).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.*
§ 1.108-6 Limitations on the exclusion of income from the discharge of qualified real property business indebtedness. ( a ) *Indebtedness in excess of value.* With respect to any qualified real property business indebtedness that is discharged, the amount excluded from gross income under section 108(a)(1)(D) (concerning discharges of qualified real property business indebtedness) shall not exceed the excess, if any, of the outstanding principal amount of that indebtedness immediately before the discharge over the net fair market value of the qualifying real property, as defined in § 1.1017-1(c)(1), immediately before the discharge. For purposes of this section, *net fair market value* means the fair market value of the qualifying real property (notwithstanding section 7701(g)), reduced by the outstanding principal amount of any qualified real property business indebtedness (other than the discharged indebtedness) that is secured by such property immediately before and after the discharge. Also, for purposes of section 108(c)(2)(A) and this section, outstanding principal amount means the principal amount of indebtedness together with all additional amounts owed that, immediately before the discharge, are equivalent to principal, in that interest on such amounts would accrue and compound in the future, except that outstanding principal amount shall not include amounts that are subject to section 108(e)(2) and shall be adjusted to account for unamortized premium and discount consistent with section 108(e)(3).
( b ) *Overall limitation.* The amount excluded from gross income under section 108(a)(1)(D) shall not exceed the aggregate adjusted bases of all depreciable real property held by the taxpayer immediately before the discharge (other than depreciable real property acquired in contemplation of the discharge) reduced by the sum of any— ( 1 ) Depreciation claimed for the taxable year the taxpayer excluded discharge of indebtedness from gross income under section 108(a)(1)(D); and
( 2 ) Reductions to the adjusted bases of depreciable real property required under section 108(b) or section 108(g) for the same taxable year.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section applies to discharges of qualified real property business indebtedness occurring on or after October 22, 1998.
[T.D. 8787, 63 FR 56563, Oct. 22, 1998]
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Sven (Bill) AnteLundberg, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Merus N.V.; and

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: April 29, 2020  By: 
/s/ Sven A. Lundberg
   
**Sven (Bill) Ante Lundberg**

**President, Chief Executive Officer and**

**PrincipalFinancial Officer**

*(Principal Executive Officer and*

*Principal Financial Officer)*
**
Visual Observation 

Onslow County will conduct flight operations with no less than three 

personal on the ground observing at all times. These individuals will 

consist of; Pilot In Charge, Ground observer, and Safety manager. 

These flight operations will take place in areas clear of obstructions to all 

ground personnel and the UAS. The safety manager on site will be 

equipped with a two way communication radio and briefed on all 

emergency phone numbers and frequencies for the local area. (Gaurd and 

local towers)

The PIC will conduct flight operations using an Apple iPad attached to the 

remote for maximum view area. All flight data is available to the PIC on the 

Apple iPad screen. This data includes altitude, direction of UAS, real time 

map location and real time high definition video. 

Other observers will assist from no less than .05 miles away from PIC. 

They may utilize binoculars to better track and detect air traffic. These 

observers will also help to maintain a clear airspace by looking for other 

potential aircraft in the area or obstructions that may hinder flight 

operations. All observers and PIC will have cell phones on person and 

essential emergency numbers at their disposal.
EXHIBIT 10.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference on Form S-8 (333-90164 and
333-97089) of our report on the financial statements of Circle Group Holdings,
Inc. (formally known as Circle Group Internet Inc.) and Subsidiaries, as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2001, dated February 28, 2002, included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries for
the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                                     /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP


Chicago, Illinois
April 11, 2003
## EPA Registration Jacket 39578-147*Commercial/financial information may be entitled to confidential treatment*4870*Commercial/financial information may be entitled to confidential treatment*71
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------





                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Julie Smolyansky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Lifeway Foods, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2003:

     (1)  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.




                                   /s/ Julie Smolyansky
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Julie Smolyansky
                                   Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial and
                                   Accounting Officer, President, Treasurer and
Date:  November 14, 2003           Director
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.4505 Orthopedic surgical instrumentation designed for osteochondral implants with press-fit fixation. ( a ) *Identification.* Orthopedic surgical instruments designed for osteochondral implants with press-fit fixation are hand-held devices intended to manipulate bone and cartilage tissue or the implant for the positioning, alignment, defect creation, and placement of press-fit osteochondral implants that utilize no additional means of fixation (*e.g.,* suture fixation, adhesives). This type of device includes instruments specific to the geometry of the implant.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 888.9. The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Technical specifications regarding geometry of the instruments must be specified and validated to demonstrate that the instruments can safely position and place the implant.
( 2 ) The patient contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 3 ) Labeling must include: ( i ) Identification of implant(s) and instruments which have been validated for use together; and
( ii ) Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing any reusable parts.
[84 FR 57321, Oct. 25, 2019, as amended at 85 FR 44188, July 22, 2020]
#### State of Connecticut *v.*John Reed

*David B. Rahman,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*Alfonse C. Fascmo,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued November 4

decided November 4, 1969

The motion by the state to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is granted.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Pierre Karl Peladeau, Chief Executive Officer of Quebecor Media Inc.
(the "Company"), have reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for
the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and based on the inquiries I have
made or caused to be made in the fulfillment of my responsibilities as the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
for the periods covered by the Report:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                            /s/ Pierre Karl Peladeau
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Pierre Karl Peladeau
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            March 31, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Quebecor Media Inc. and will be retained by Quebecor Media Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS BEING MADE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE PURPOSE OF COMPLIANCE BY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 906, AND
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE A PART OF THE REPORT OR FILED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE.
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1100 Scintillation (gamma) camera. ( a ) *Identification.* A scintillation (gamma) camera is a device intended to image the distribution of radionuclides in the body by means of a photon radiation detector. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, radionuclide anatomical markers, component parts, and accessories.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls).
[55 FR 48443, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 46953, Sept. 10, 2001]
Exhibit 35.1



|     |                        |                              
|---- | ---------------------- | -----------------------------
|LOGO |                        | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|     | D1086-120, 12th Floor 
|     | 550 South Tryon Street
|     | Charlotte, NC 28202   
|     | 1-800-326-1334        

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, CITIBANK, N.A., as Certificate
Administrator and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee , and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1 (the Agreement).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this
Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has
been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of
March 2016.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 198 V

Filed: July 20, 2017

UNPUBLISHED

ALICE ODOM

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Causation

- In

- Fact; Influenza (Flu)
Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Mary Coffey, Coffey & Nichols, LLC, St. Louis, MO , for petitioner.
Ryan Daniel Pyles , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On February 10, 2017

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“ SIRVA ” ) following her October 3, 2015 influenza ( “ fl u” ) vaccination

. Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 19, 2017

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “ has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA; that a preponderance of evidence establishes that her SIRVA was caused

- in

-

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

e ase of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).fact by the flu vaccination she received on October 3, 2015; and that no other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA were identified .” Id. at 3 . Respondent further agrees that the statutory six month sequela requirement has been satisfied and that peti tioner has

satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act

. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
§ 900.16 Appeals of denials of certification. ( a ) The appeals procedures described in this section are available only to facilities that are denied certification by FDA after they have been accredited by an approved accreditation body. Appeals for facilities that have failed to become accredited are governed by the procedures set forth in § 900.15.
( b ) FDA may deny the application if the agency has reason to believe that: ( 1 ) The facility will not be operated in accordance with standards established under § 900.12;
( 2 ) The facility will not permit inspections or provide access to records or information in a timely fashion; or
( 3 ) The facility has been guilty of misrepresentation in obtaining the accreditation.
( c ) ( 1 ) If FDA denies an application for certification by a faciity that has received accreditation from an approved accreditation body, FDA shall provide the facility with a statement of the grounds on which the denial is based.
( 2 ) A facility that has been denied accreditation may request reconsideration and appeal of FDA's determination in accordance with the applicable provisions of § 900.15(d).
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.4150 Calipers for clinical use. ( a ) *Identification.* A caliper for clinical use is a compass-like device intended for use in measuring the thickness or diameter of a part of the body or the distance between two body surfaces, such as for measuring an excised skeletal specimen to determine the proper replacement size of a prosthesis.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 888.9.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 66 FR 38815, July 25, 2001]