alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- Contact

### Geology of the Hanover-York district, Pennsylvania

#### Professional Paper 204

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and					   
Notices

U.S. Department of the					   Interior |				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp204 
                    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact				   Page				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 2012 
00:10:18
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6310 Medical device data system. ( a ) *Identification.* ( 1 ) A medical device data system (MDDS) is a hardware device that is intended to provide one or more of the following uses, without controlling or altering the functions or parameters of any connected medical devices: ( i ) The electronic transfer of medical device data;
( ii ) The electronic storage of medical device data;
( iii ) The electronic conversion of medical device data from one format to another format in accordance with a preset specification; or
( iv ) The electronic display of medical device data.
( 2 ) An MDDS may include electronic or electrical hardware such as a physical communications medium (including wireless hardware), modems, and interfaces. This identification does not include hardware devices intended to be used in connection with active patient monitoring. Hardware devices for active patient monitoring are classified under other regulations and are not included in this regulation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
[76 FR 8649, Feb. 15, 2011, as amended at 86 FR 20283, Apr. 19, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,965,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     589,198,018
<DEPRECIATION>                              54,030,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             553,118,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   390,663,581
<OTHER-SE>                                (53,285,919)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               553,118,097
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,528,378
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,265,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,415,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,832,410
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,832,410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,832,410
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<FN>
<F1>Current Assets and Current Liabilities are not separated to conform with
industry standards.
<F2>Income is from rental income. There are no Sales or Cost of Goods Sold.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.4190 Clip forming/cutting instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* A clip forming/cutting instrument is a device used by the physician to make tissue clips from wire stock.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter.
[44 FR 51730, Sept. 4, 1979, as amended at 59 FR 63012, Dec. 7, 1994]
# C_2014261EN.01004401.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/44

---

Appeal brought on 18 June 2014 by Thierry Rouffaud against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 9 April 2014 in Case F-59/13, Rouffaud v EEAS

Rouffaud

EEAS

(Case T-457/14 P)

2014/C 261/70

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Thierry Rouffaud (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by M. de Abreu Caldas, D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014 in Case F-59/13 Rouffaud v European External Action Service; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014 in Case F-59/13 Rouffaud v European External Action Service;

Rouffaud

European External Action Service

| — | Order the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EEAS to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on three grounds of appeal.

| 1. | First ground of appeal, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence, in so far as the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) failed to draw the attention of the parties to the question of the admissibility of the application until just before the final act of long proceedings, making it impossible for the applicant to prepare adequate arguments. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First ground of appeal, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence, in so far as the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) failed to draw the attention of the parties to the question of the admissibility of the application until just before the final act of long proceedings, making it impossible for the applicant to prepare adequate arguments.

| 2. | Second ground of appeal, alleging an error of law as regards the application of the rule on consistency, in so far as the subject-matter and the cause are perfectly identical as between the claim and the action for annulment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second ground of appeal, alleging an error of law as regards the application of the rule on consistency, in so far as the subject-matter and the cause are perfectly identical as between the claim and the action for annulment.

| 3. | Third ground of appeal, alleging a distortion of the evidence and of the facts, in so far as the CST included in its judgment only a limited part of the applicant’s pleadings, which does not reflect the true situation after the closure of the written procedure. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third ground of appeal, alleging a distortion of the evidence and of the facts, in so far as the CST included in its judgment only a limited part of the applicant’s pleadings, which does not reflect the true situation after the closure of the written procedure.

---
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.5201 Intense pulsed light device for managing dry eye. ( a ) *Identification.* An intense pulsed light device for managing dry eye is a prescription device intended for use in the application of intense pulsed light therapy to the skin. The device is used in patients with dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction, also known as evaporative dry eye or lipid deficiency dry eye.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Clinical performance testing must evaluate adverse events and improvement of dry eye signs and symptoms under anticipated conditions of use.
( 2 ) Thermal safety assessment in a worst-case scenario must be performed to validate temperature safeguards.
( 3 ) Performance testing must demonstrate electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of the device in the intended use environment.
( 4 ) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
( 5 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 6 ) Physician and patient labeling must include: ( i ) Device technical parameters;
( ii ) A summary of the clinical performance testing conducted with the device;
( iii ) A description of the intended treatment area location;
( iv ) Warnings and instructions regarding the use of safety-protective eyewear for patient and device operator;
( v ) A description of intense pulse light (IPL) radiation hazards and protection for patient and operator;
( vi ) Instructions for use, including an explanation of all user interface components; and
( vii ) Instructions on how to clean and maintain the device and its components.
[88 FR 3638, Jan. 20, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         412,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,914,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   166,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,579,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,931,000
<PP&E>                                       1,943,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 750,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,163,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,577,000
<BONDS>                                        437,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,351,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (14,202,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,163,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,271,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,518,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,106,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (345,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (345,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (345,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo80931 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# C_2014421EN.01004102.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Schönberger v Court of Auditors

(Case T-26/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2011 promotion year - Guiding multiplication rates - Inter partes proceedings))

2014/C 421/58

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Peter Schönberger (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Mader, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: B. Schäfer and I. Ní Riagáin Düro, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 in Schönberger v Court of Auditors (F-14/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:167), seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

Schönberger

Court of Auditors

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 in Schönberger v Court of Auditors (F-14/12); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 in Schönberger v Court of Auditors (F-14/12);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 29.3.2014.

1

---
§ 710.9 Exemptions. The following classes of persons are not requested to register in accordance with this part 710 because the Commissioner has found that such registration is not justified: ( a ) Beauty shops, cosmetologists, retailers, pharmacies, and other persons and organizations that compound cosmetic products at a single location and administer, dispense, or distribute them at retail from that location and who do not otherwise manufacture or package cosmetic products at that location.
( b ) Physicians, hospitals, clinics, and public health agencies.
( c ) Persons who manufacture, prepare, compound, or process cosmetic products solely for use in research, pilot plant production, teaching, or chemical analysis, and who do not sell these products.
# C_2014135EN.01005501.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/55

---

Action brought on 24 February 2014 — Tilda Riceland Private v OHIM — Siam Grains (BASMALI LONG GRAIN RICE RIZ LONG DE LUXE)

(Case T-136/14)

2014/C 135/71

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tilda Riceland Private Ltd (Gurgaon, India) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, N. Urwin and D. Sills, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Siam Grains Co. Ltd (Bangkok, Thailand)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 December 2013 given in Case R 1086/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 December 2013 given in Case R 1086/2012-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in black and white containing the verbal elements ‘BASMALI LONG GRAIN RICE RIZ LONG DE LUXE’ for goods in Class 30 — Community trade mark application No 3 520 641

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The earlier non-registered trade mark and the earlier sign ‘used in the course of trade designating a class of goods’‘BASMATI’ used in the United Kingdom in relation to ‘rice’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
June 16, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOE BROCK RAMEY, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00147-CV V.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Federal Home 

Loan Mortgage Corporation, signed February 4, 2014, was heard on the transcript 

of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We 

order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Joe Brock Ramey to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

PAUL SINCLAIR AND KELLY WELLS 

SINCLAIR,

Petitioners

v.

FIRST GLOBAL EXPRESS, INC. AND 

YAKOV R. MELNIK,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 401 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit 34.3**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors 

Situs Holdings, LLC 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Regulation ABServicing Criteria (Management’s Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Regulation AB(the applicable servicing criteria) for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting for the Operating or Trust Advisor Services Platform (the “Platform”), including only thoseasset-backed securities transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. Appendix B to management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting thePlatform. Management is responsible for Situs Holdings, LLC’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to thePlatform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures werelimited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further,an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered bythis report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the yearended December 31, 2017, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ RSM US LLP 

Duluth, Minnesota 

February 28, 2018 

 
1
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.1375 Diagnostic electromyograph. ( a ) *Identification.* A diagnostic electromyograph is a device intended for medical purposes, such as to monitor and display the bioelectric signals produced by muscles, to stimulate peripheral nerves, and to monitor and display the electrical activity produced by nerves, for the diagnosis and prognosis of neuromuscular disease.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
#### § 812.42 FDA and IRB approval.

A sponsor shall not begin an investigation or part of an investigation until an IRB and FDA have both approved the application or supplemental application relating to the investigation or part of an investigation.

[46 FR 8957, Jan. 27, 1981]