alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Email to Chairman Hall

Alfreda Mitre Alfreda Mitre to: Deirdre Rothery 08/02/2012 12:05 PM

FYI

Alfreda L. Mitre | Tribal Program Director U.S. | EPA R8

1595 Wynkoop Street Denver | CO 80202-1129

Phone: 303-312-6343 | Fax: 303-504-3120

----- Forwarded by Alfreda Mitre/R8/USEPA/US on 08/02/2012 12:05 PM -----

From: Alfreda Mitre/R8/USEPA/US

To: redtippedarrow@rtc.coop

Cc: ffox@mhanation.com, joegillies@mhanation.com

Date: 08/02/2012 11:05 AM

Subject:

Tex,

Following is the official notice regarding the Interim Final FIP Rule . 

Thank you for your leadership in Indian Country.

****************************************************************************

Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson, EPA Administrator

40 CFR Part 49 – Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities, Fort 

Berthold Indian Reservation (Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nations, or MHA Nation), North Dakota. (as 

defined in §49.152)

This email is to inform you that Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency, has signed an interim final rule “Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and 

Natural Gas Production Facilities, Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Mandan, Hidatsa and 

Arikara Nations, or MHA Nation), North Dakota,” (Fort Berthold Oil and Gas FIP) a federal rule 

that applies to oil and gas operations producing from the Bakken Pool on the Fort Berthold 

Indian Reservation in North Dakota. 

The FIP requires owners and operators of oil and natural gas production facilities to reduce 

emissions of volatile organic compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, and 

production and storage operations. The agency proposed a Reservation-specific FIP concurrently 

with this interim final rule.

Please find, attached, a copy of the notification sent by certified mail.

Chairman Tex Hall Notification of FIP Letter 8-1-12.pdf
Fort Berthold FIP NFR_8-1-12 (interim final rule) for CHAIRMAN HALL letter.pdf

Alfreda L. Mitre | Tribal Program Director U.S. | EPA R8

1595 Wynkoop Street Denver | CO 80202-1129

Phone: 303-312-6343 | Fax: 303-504-3120
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Zimbabwe

On March 6, 2003, by Executive Order 13288, the President declared a national emergency and blocked the property of persons undermining democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706). He took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine Zimbabwe's democratic processes or institutions. These actions and policies have contributed to the deliberate breakdown in the rule of law in Zimbabwe, to politically motivated violence and intimidation in that country, and to political and economic instability in the southern African region.

On November 22, 2005, the President issued Executive Order 13391 to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13288 by ordering the blocking of the property of additional persons undermining democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe.

On July 25, 2008, the President issued Executive Order 13469, which expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13288 and ordered the blocking of the property of additional persons undermining democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe.

Because the actions and policies of these persons continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on March 6, 2003, and the measures adopted on that date, on November 22, 2005, and on July 25, 2008, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond March 6, 2010. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine Zimbabwe's democratic processes or institutions.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2010-4805

Billing code 3195-W0-P
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.4800 Bone particle collector. ( a ) *Identification.* A bone particle collector is a filtering device intended to be inserted into a suction tube during the early stages of otologic surgery to collect bone particles for future use.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 874.9.
[64 FR 10949, Mar. 8, 1999]
Cite as 2022 Ark. 204

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE APPOINTMENT OF CLERK OF 

THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT 

OF APPEALS

Opinion Delivered: November 17, 2022

PER CURIAM

In accordance with section 2(F) of amendment 80 to the Arkansas Constitution, Kyle 

E. Burton, Esquire, of Benton is appointed Clerk of the Supreme Court and Court of 

Appeals, effective immediately.
# C_2015346EN.01002802.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2015 — Verein StHD v OHIM (Representation of a black ribbon)

(Case T-530/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark representing a black ribbon - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 346/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Verein Sterbehilfe Deutschland (Verein StHD) (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Brauns, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 May 2014 (Case R 1940/2013-4) concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing a black ribbon as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Verein Sterbehilfe Deutschland (Verein StHD) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Verein Sterbehilfe Deutschland (Verein StHD) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000815024
<NAME> AMERICAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,873,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,873,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   924
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (585,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (584,581)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.3520 Plinth. ( a ) *Identification.* A plinth is a flat, padded board with legs that is intended for medical purposes. A patient is placed on the device for treatment or examination.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, regarding general requirements concerning records and § 820.198, regarding complaint files.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 38817, July 25, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for Anaren Microwave, Inc. filed with Form
10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,798,282
<SECURITIES>                                   118,219,759
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,635,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                        55,000
<INVENTORY>                                     16,039,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,527,316
<PP&E>                                          47,627,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (29,716,861)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,636,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,557,332
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           253,881
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,260,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,636,207
<SALES>                                         47,412,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,412,235
<CGS>                                           28,515,558
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,299,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  82,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,698,591
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,423,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,275,591
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,275,591
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.35



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10312-10313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 21, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 28, 2009 (74 FR 55584), Hospira Inc., 1776 North 
Centennial Drive, McPherson, Kansas 67460-1247, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as an importer of Remifentanil (9739), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import Remifentanil for use in dosage form 
manufacturing.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the 
registration of Hospira Inc. to import the basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United 
States obligations under international

[[Page 10313]]

treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this 
time. DEA has investigated Hospira Inc. to ensure that the company's 
registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation 
has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security 
systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local 
laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, 
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer 
of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: February 26, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-4770 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# C_2016098EN.01003401.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2016 — LR Health & Beauty Systems v OHIM — Robert McBride (LR nova pure.)

(Case T-202/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark LR nova pure. - Earlier international word mark NOVA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 098/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (Ahlen, Germany) (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. Harrington, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Robert McBride Ltd (Manchester, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2014 (Case R 272/2013-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Robert McBride Ltd and LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.

1

---
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Unemployment Crisis

              																	United States. Congress. Joint Economic Committee, 1956-					 and 	Ninety-Seventh Congress, 1981-1983. 						*Unemployment Crisis : Hearing Before the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session, December 9, 1982*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										December 9, 1982,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/903,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2015-CCRE25 Mortgage Trust (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as awhole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements requiredin this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as Special Servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer forthe Scottsdale Quarter Mortgage Loan, Pacific Life Insurance Company, as Special Servicer for the Scottsdale Quarter Mortgage Loan,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee for the Scottsdale Quarter Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as Custodian for the Scottsdale Quarter Mortgage Loan, KeyBank National Association, as Primary Servicer for the Pearlridge CenterMortgage Loan, KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicer for the Pearlridge Center Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee for the Pearlridge Center Mortgage Loan, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for thePearlridge Center Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 24, 2020

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)
FILED

August 29, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

 AT KNOXVILLE

 AUGUST 1997 SESSION

JAMES DAVID PACK, ) 

) C.C.A. No. 03C01-9611-CR-00440 

Appellant, )

) Hamilton County

V. )

) Hon. Douglas A. Meyer, Judge

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) ( Writ of error coram nobis) 

Appellee. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

James David Pack, Pro Se Charles W. Burson

F.C. I. Beckley Attorney General & Reporter 

P.O. Box 305

Beaver, WV 25813 Marvin E. Clements, Jr. 

Assistant Attorney General

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

William H. Cox III 

District Attorney General

600 Market Street, Suite 310

Chattanooga, TN 37402

OPINION FILED: ___________________

AFFIRMED

PAUL G. SUMMERS,

Judge
-2-

O P I N I O N

In February 1979 the appellant, James David Pack, pled guilty to four

counts of second degree burglary, two counts of passing a forged document,

and one count of grand larceny. He received an effective sentence of three

years incarceration. In September 1982 he pled guilty to four counts of simple

possession of a controlled substance, one count of possession of a controlled

substance with intent to sell, three counts of first degree burglary, one count of

second degree burglary, one count of possession of burglary tools, and

numerous counts of receiving stolen property. He received an effective sentence

of ten years incarceration. In May 1996 the appellant filed a petition for writ of

error coram nobis attacking these convictions. The trial court dismissed the

petition on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations. The

appellant then filed a motion for reconsideration and motion to construe his

previous pleading as a petition for post-conviction relief. 

The appellant's most recent convictions became final in 1982. At that

time the law allowed one year from a final judgment to file a petition for writ of

error coram nobis. Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-7-103 (1980). The appellant's time

period for filing his petition expired in 1983. Therefore, his petition for writ of

error coram nobis is time barred. 

The appellant also moved that his petition be construed as one for postconviction relief. However, at the time of his offenses, the law allowed three

years to file a petition for post-conviction relief. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-102

(1980). The time period for filing this petition expired in 1985. Therefore,

regardless of how the appellant’s motion is construed, it is time barred. 
-3-

 We find appellant's pro se brief artfully drafted and we understand his

allegations. We, however, find no error of law mandating reversal of the trial

court’s determinations. Pursuant to Tenn. R. Ct. Crim. App., Rule 20, we

AFFIRM.

__________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, Judge

CONCUR:

_________________________

GARY R. WADE, Judge

_________________________

WILLIAM M. BARKER, Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

AARON J. BRESSI,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 97 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10 th day of February , 202 3

, the “Application for Appointment of

Counsel to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal” is DENIED.