alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.4180 Eustachian tube balloon dilation system. ( a ) *Identification.* A Eustachian tube balloon dilation system is a prescription device that includes a flexible catheter attached to an inflatable balloon. The system is intended for use in dilating the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube for treating persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be evaluated: ( i ) Mechanical testing, including tensile and flexural testing of catheter joints and materials.
( ii ) Durability testing, including fatigue and burst pressure testing of the balloon materials and components.
( iii ) Inflation and deflation characterization testing, including time and pressure measurements, and leak testing of the balloon.
( iv ) Verification testing of safety features built into the device must be performed, including the characterization of catheter geometries and distal tip insertion limitation mechanisms.
( 2 ) Simulated use testing in a clinically relevant model must demonstrate the reliability of the device to remain mechanically functional throughout the anticipated conditions of use, and validate that the design features limit access to only the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube.
( 3 ) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 4 ) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the device.
( 5 ) Performance data must support shelf life by demonstrating continued sterility of the device, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
( 6 ) Training must include simulated use on cadavers to ensure users can follow the instructions for use to allow safe use of the device.
( 7 ) Labeling must include: ( i ) Detailed instructions for use.
( ii ) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters, including maximum allowed inflation pressure, allowable catheter geometries, and available balloon sizes.
( iii ) A shelf life.
[81 FR 73041, Oct. 24, 2016]
§ 876.4730 Manual gastroenterology-urology surgical instrument and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* A manual gastroenterology-urology surgical instrument and accessories is a device designed to be used for gastroenterological and urological surgical procedures. The device may be nonpowered, hand-held, or hand-manipulated. Manual gastroenterology-urology surgical instruments include the biopsy forceps cover, biopsy tray without biopsy instruments, line clamp, nonpowered rectal probe, nonelectrical clamp, colostomy spur-crushers, locking device for intestinal clamp, needle holder, gastro-urology hook, gastro-urology probe and director, nonself-retaining retractor, laparotomy rings, nonelectrical snare, rectal specula, bladder neck spreader, self-retaining retractor, and scoop. A manual surgical instrument that is intended specifically for use as an aid in the insertion, placement, fixation, or anchoring of surgical mesh during urogynecologic procedures are classified under § 884.4910 of this chapter.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.
[48 FR 53023, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 25049, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38801, July 25, 2001; 82 FR 12171, Mar. 1, 2017]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7158 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7158

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 East Battles Road in Santa Maria, California, as the ``Larry 
                   Lavagnino Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2024

 Mr. Carbajal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 East Battles Road in Santa Maria, California, as the ``Larry 
                   Lavagnino Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LARRY LAVAGNINO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 East Battles Road in Santa Maria, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Larry Lavagnino Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Larry 
Lavagnino Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby
made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING
CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, as Special
Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as Special Servicer, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY
AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor with respect
to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, COMM 2015-CCRE25 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section
10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per
the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.









Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank

























Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAVID ADOLFSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2381

[ January 4, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William L

. Roby, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 4320 05 CF00 1642A

.

David Adolfson, Doral

, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ERBER and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.5350 Microsedimentation centrifuge. ( a ) *Identification.* A microsedimentation centrifuge is a device used to sediment red cells for the microsedimentation rate test.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). This device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.
[45 FR 60598, Sept. 12, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 63007, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38789, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1320 Fornixscope. ( a ) *Identification.* A fornixscope is a device intended to pull back and hold open the eyelid to aid examination of the conjunctiva.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 33355, Sept. 2, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 35604, Sept. 14, 1988; 66 FR 38810, July 25, 2001]
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF MOSAIX, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
  SUBSIDIARY NAME                   OWNERSHIP PERCENTAGE                      JURISDICTION
<S>                                 <C>                                       <C>
Caleo Software, Inc.*                       100%                                Georgia
Mosaix FSC, Inc.                            100%                                  Guam
ViewStar Corporation*                       100%                               California
Mosaix Limited                              100%                             United Kingdom
</TABLE>

-----------------
*        The assets and operations of each of these subsidiaries were assumed by
         Mosaix, Inc., and each subsidiary was dissolved, effective January 1,
         1999.
# C_2015034EN.01005501.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/55

---

Action brought on 9 December 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-138/14)

(2015/C 034/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision on the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights in the EU pension scheme, a decision which applies the new general implementing provisions to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the illegality of Article 9 of the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the illegality of Article 9 of the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | Annul the decision of 17 February 2014 to calculate the annuities recognised in the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union on the transfer of her pension rights in that scheme, under the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 17 February 2014 to calculate the annuities recognised in the pension scheme of the institutions of the European Union on the transfer of her pension rights in that scheme, under the general implementing provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
**Exhibit 33.2**

 

**MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

 

Platform:  Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) equipment loan-backed securities issued by CNH Equipment Trust, as listed in Appendix A, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”).

 

Applicable Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(v), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).  With respect to the Platform, servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances.

 

Period:  Twelve months ended December 31, 2017 (the “Period”).

 

With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

 

·                  The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

·                  The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

 

·                  Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

 
| ** ** | **CITIBANK,   N.A.** |
|------------|----------------------|
|       |                 |
|       | By:                  | /s/ Karen   Montbach |
|       |                 |
|       | Its:                 | Managing   Director |

 

Dated: February 23, 2018

 

----

 

**Appendix A**

 

CNH Transactions and Securities Constituting the Platform

 

**DEAL NAME**

CNH Equipment Trust 2014-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2015-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2016-A

CNH Equipment Trust 2016-C

CNH Equipment Trust 2017-A

CNH Equipment Trust 2017-C

 

----
AGREEMENT to Tender 500,000
                  Class A Common Stock Purchase Warrants
                                    in
                     Brown Disc Products Company, Inc.



TO:   Brown Disc Products Company, Inc.                    March 17, 1997 
      3029 South Harbor Blvd.
      Santa Ana, CA 92704

Dear Sirs:

      I, DAVID J. LOPES, a resident of Southern California, with home address
of 19421 Sierra Luna, Irvine, Cnlifornia 92612, being the record holder of
500,000 Class A common stock purchase warrants issued by BROWN DISC PRODUCTS
COMPANY, INC. a Colorado corporation (THE "COMPANY"), evidenced by Warrant
Certificate number A-04 (THE "WARRANTS") hereby returns all such Warrants to
the Company.


                                       Very truly yours,
                                       David J. Lopes

                                       By:  /s/  David J. Lopes
                                            -----------------------
                                            David J. Lopes
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.4420 Ear, nose, and throat manual surgical instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* An ear, nose, and throat manual surgical instrument is one of a variety of devices intended for use in surgical procedures to examine or treat the bronchus, esophagus, trachea, larynx, pharynx, nasal and paranasal sinus, or ear. This generic type of device includes the esophageal dilator; tracheal bistour (a long, narrow surgical knife); tracheal dilator; tracheal hook; laryngeal injection set; laryngeal knife; laryngeal saw; laryngeal trocar; laryngectomy tube; adenoid curette; adenotome; metal tongue depressor; mouth gag; oral screw; salpingeal curette; tonsillectome; tonsil guillotine; tonsil screw; tonsil snare; tonsil suction tube; tonsil suturing hook; antom reforator; ethmoid curette; frontal sinus-rasp; nasal curette; nasal rasp; nasal rongeur; nasal saw; nasal scissors; nasal snare; sinus irrigator; sinus trephine; ear curette; ear excavator; ear rasp; ear scissor, ear snare; ear spoon; ear suction tube; malleous ripper; mastoid gauge; microsurgical ear chisel; myringotomy tube inserter; ossici holding clamp; sacculotomy tack inserter; vein press; wire ear loop; microrule; mirror; mobilizer; ear, nose, and throat punch; ear, nose and throat knife; and ear, nose, and throat trocar.
( b ) *Classification* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 874.9.
[51 FR 40389, Nov. 9, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 32111, Aug. 25, 1987; 65 FR 2316, Jan. 14, 2000; 72 FR 17400, Apr. 9, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Part 888

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

#### § 888.5 Resurfacing technique.

Because of resurfacing techniques, certain joint prostheses require far less bone resection than other devices intended to repair or replace the same joint. The amount of bone resection may or may not affect the safety and effectiveness of the implantation of the prosthesis. When a resurfacing technique is used, the name of the prosthesis includes this information.
# C_2015065EN.01003601.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/36

---

Action brought on 21 November 2014 — ANKO v Commission

(Case T-771/14)

(2015/C 065/50)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ANKO Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare that the sum of EUR 2 96  149,77, which the Commission paid to the applicant in respect of the DOC@HAND project, constitutes eligible costs and that accordingly the applicant is under no obligation to repay that sum as unduly paid; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the sum of EUR 2 96  149,77, which the Commission paid to the applicant in respect of the DOC@HAND project, constitutes eligible costs and that accordingly the applicant is under no obligation to repay that sum as unduly paid; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant’s legal costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s legal costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action concerns the liability of the Commission under the agreement No 508015 for the performance of the DOC@HAND project, under Article 272 TFEU. In particular, the applicant maintains that, although it performed its contractual obligations, the Commission, contrary to the terms of that agreement, the principle of good faith, the prohibition of abuse of rights and the principle of proportionality, sought the recovery of sums paid to ΑΝΚΟ as not being eligible costs.

For that reason, the applicant maintains, first, that the Commission relies on wholly unfounded and in any event unproven grounds in order to reject almost all the costs incurred by ANKO as being ineligible and to seek the repayment of the sum paid to ΑΝΚΟ in respect of the DOC@HAND project. The applicant maintains, second, that the Commission, in rejecting 99,59 % of the contribution it is obliged to pay, because that allegedly did not correspond to eligible costs, which the applicant incurred for the requirements of the project, infringes the principles of the prohibition of abuse of rights and of proportionality.

first

second

---
# C_2014361EN.01002201.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/22

---

Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-605/14)

2014/C 361/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Drex Technologies SA (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d’Elzius, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare its action to be both admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare its action to be both admissible and well founded;

| — | consequently, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and the subsequent measures implementing it in so far as they concern the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, annul Decision 2014/309/CFSP of 28 May 2014 and the subsequent measures implementing it in so far as they concern the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council
   (1).

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.

1

---