alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 884.5340 Single-use internal condom. ( a ) *Identification.* A single-use internal condom is an over-the-counter sheath-like device that lines the vaginal or anal wall and is inserted into the vagina or anus prior to the initiation of coitus. At the conclusion of coitus, it is removed and discarded. It is indicated for contraception and/or prophylactic (preventing the transmission of sexually transmitted infections) purposes.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Clinical performance testing must evaluate the following: ( i ) Rate of clinical failure of the device and rate of individual failure modes of the device based on an acute failure modes study evaluating the intended use (vaginal and/or anal intercourse); and
( ii ) Cumulative pregnancy rate when using the device based on a contraceptive effectiveness study (when the device is indicated for vaginal intercourse).
( 2 ) Viral penetration testing must demonstrate the device is an effective barrier to sexually transmitted infections.
( 3 ) Nonclinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be evaluated: ( i ) Mechanical testing must demonstrate the device can withstand forces under anticipated use conditions, include evaluation of tensile, tear, and burst properties of the device; and
( ii ) Compatibility testing with personal lubricants must determine whether the physical properties of the device are adversely affected by use of additional lubricants.
( 4 ) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 5 ) Shelf-life testing must demonstrate that the device maintains its performance characteristics and the packaging of the device must maintain integrity for the duration of the shelf-life.
( 6 ) Labeling of the device must include: ( i ) Contraceptive effectiveness table comparing typical use and perfect use pregnancy rates with the device to other available methods of birth control;
( ii ) Statement regarding the adverse events associated with the device, including potential transmission of infection, adverse tissue reaction, and ulceration or other physical trauma;
( iii ) Expiration date; and
( iv ) Statement regarding compatibility with additional types of personal lubricants.
[83 FR 48714, Sept. 27, 2018]
Section 487A

(b) REGULATORY IMPROVEMENT AND STREAMLINING EXPERI-MENTS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may continue any experi-mental

sites in existence on the date of enactment of the High-er

Education Amendments of 1998. Any activities approved by

the Secretary prior to such date that are inconsistent with this

section shall be discontinued not later than June 30, 1999.

(2) REPORT.—The Secretary shall review and evaluate the

experience of institutions participating as experimental sites

during the period of 1993 through 1998 under this section (as

such section was in effect on the day before the date of enact-ment

of the Higher Education Amendments of 1998), and shall

submit a report based on this review and evaluation to the

Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the Senate and

the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the House

of Representatives not later than 6 months after the enactment

of the Higher Education Amendments of 1998. Such report

shall include—

(A) a list of participating institutions and the specific

statutory or regulatory waivers granted to each institution;

(B) the findings and conclusions reached regarding

each of the experiments conducted; and

(C) recommendations for amendments to improve and

streamline this Act, based on the results of the experi-ment.

(3) SELECTION.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—Upon the submission of the report

required by paragraph (2), the Secretary is authorized to

select a limited number of additional institutions for vol-untary

participation as experimental sites to provide rec-ommendations

to the Secretary on the impact and effec-tiveness

of proposed regulations or new management ini-tiatives.

(B) CONSULTATION.—Prior to approving any additional

experimental sites, the Secretary shall consult with the

Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the Senate

and the Committee on Education and the Workforce of the

House of Representatives and shall provide to such Com-mittees—

(i) a list of institutions proposed for participation

in the experiment and the specific statutory or regu-latory

waivers proposed to be granted to each institu-tion;

(ii) a statement of the objectives to be achieved

through the experiment; and

(iii) an identification of the period of time over

which the experiment is to be conducted.

(C) WAIVERS.—The Secretary is authorized to waive,

for any institution participating as an experimental site

under subparagraph (A), any requirements in this title, or

regulations prescribed under this title, that will bias the

results of the experiment, except that the Secretary shall

not waive any provisions with respect to award rules,

grant and loan maximum award amounts, and need analy-sis

requirements.
# C_2015034EN.01004101.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/41

---

Action brought on 29 November 2014 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — STD Tekstil (MOTORTOWN)

(Case T-785/14)

(2015/C 034/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo and M. Toro Gordillo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: STD Tekstil Limited Sirketi (Istanbul, Turkey)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘MOTORTOWN’ — Application for registration No 1 0 3 51  931

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2014 in Case R 1960/2013-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, in which the Board of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal and affirmed the decision of the Opposition Division partially upholding Opposition No B 1 9 51  774 and rejecting in part Community figurative mark application No 1 0 3 51  931‘MOTORTOWN’; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, in which the Board of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal and affirmed the decision of the Opposition Division partially upholding Opposition No B 1 9 51  774 and rejecting in part Community figurative mark application No 1 0 3 51  931‘MOTORTOWN’; and

| — | order the party or parties opposing the action to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the party or parties opposing the action to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
§ 82.1333 D&C Red No. 33. ( a ) The color additive D&C Red. No. 33 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 74.1333(a) (1) and (b) of this chapter.
( b ) All lakes of D&C Red. No. 33 shall be manufactured from previously certified batches of the straight color additive.
[53 FR 33121, Aug. 30, 1988]
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3023 In vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod. ( a ) *Identification.* An in vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod is a prescription implanted device consisting of a balloon that is inserted into the medullary canal of long bones for the fixation of fractures. The balloon is infused with, and completely encapsulates, a liquid monomer that is exposed to a curing agent which polymerizes the monomer within the balloon creating a hardened rigid structure.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Mechanical testing must be conducted on the final device to assess burst, abrasion, bending, and torsion in static and dynamic conditions.
( ii ) Mechanical testing must demonstrate the integrity of the balloon including testing for leaks, ruptures, and release of cured/uncured material.
( iii ) Performance testing must demonstrate that the device can be inserted and removed.
( iv ) Performance testing must demonstrate the ability, in the event of a leak, to remove the uncured material from its in vivo location.
( v ) Performance testing must demonstrate the reliability and accuracy of the curing method used.
( vi ) Thermal safety testing must be conducted to evaluate the temperature rise during curing.
( 2 ) Electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) testing must be conducted for all electrical components.
( 3 ) All patient-contacting components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 4 ) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility and pyrogenicity of patient contacting components of the device that are provided sterile.
( 5 ) Performance data must validate the reprocessing instructions for any reusable components or instruments.
( 6 ) Performance data must support the shelf life of the system by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and system functionality over the established shelf life.
( 7 ) Technological characterization of the device must include materials, curing agents, and a description of the operating principles of the device, including the delivery system and devices which initiate the curing process.
( 8 ) Labeling must include the following: ( i ) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters.
( ii ) Information describing all materials of the device.
( iii ) Information describing how to perform the procedure and use the device, including the delivery system and devices which initiate the curing process, as well as how to remove the device and any uncured materials.
( iv ) A shelf life.
( v ) Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing any reusable components or instruments.
[83 FR 26759, June 8, 2018]
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.3710 Powered communication system. ( a ) *Identification.* A powered communication system is an AC- or battery-powered device intended for medical purposes that is used to transmit or receive information. It is used by persons unable to use normal communication methods because of physical impairment. Examples of powered communication systems include the following: a specialized typewriter, a reading machine, and a video picture and word screen.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 890.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 63 FR 59231, Nov. 3, 1998]
# C_2014235EN.01003001.xml

| 21.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/30

---

Action brought on 19 May 2014 — Quanzhou Wouxun Electronics v OHIM Locura Digital (WOUXUN)

(Case T-345/14)

2014/C 235/41

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Quanzhou Wouxun Electronics Co. Ltd (Quanzhou, China) (represented by: A. Sebastião and J. Pimenta, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Locura Digital, SL (Granollers, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 February 2014 in Case R 407/2013-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 February 2014 in Case R 407/2013-4;

| — | Order OHIM to refuse to grant registration of the Community trade mark No 1 0 0 72  478‘WOUXUN’ in full |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to refuse to grant registration of the Community trade mark No 1 0 0 72  478‘WOUXUN’ in full

| — | Order Locura Digital, SL to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Locura Digital, SL to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Locura Digital, SL

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark WOUXUN for goods and services in Classes 9, 39 and 42 — Application for Community trade mark No 1 0 0 72  478

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Quanzhou Wouxun Electronics Co. Ltd

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word marks WOUXUN for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 38

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was rejected in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
#### AUSTIN W. LORD AND J. MONROE HEWLETT, UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF LORD AND HEWLETT, v. THE UNITED STATES.

[43 C. Cls. R., 282 ;

217 U. S. R., 340.]

*On the claimants’ appeal.*

The act 2d March, 1901, appropriates $5,000 “ *to enable the Secretary of Agriculture to have prepared, under Ms direction, plans for a fireproof administrative building.”*The Secretary invites ten architects to compete. He limits the cost of the proposed building to $2,000,000. The claimants’ plans are approved and transmitted to Congress. They contemplate a building to cost $2,500,000. The act 9th February, 1903, authorizes the Secretary to cause a building to be erected for the Department of Agriculture “ *in accordance with pirns to be procured,”*the cost not to exceed $1,500,000. The Secretary endeavors to retain the claimants as architects, but they can not agree upon terms.

The court below decides:

I. The *Act $d March, 1901*(31 Stat L., p. 922, 938), appropriating $5,000 for architectural plans for a new Department of Agriculture, did not authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into a contract for the future services of an architect; and the Secretary’s representations as to the probable future action of Congress in regard to the selection and employment of the claimants as architects were not a contract either in form' or in substance.

II. The *Act 9th February, 1903*(32 Stat. L., p. 806), authorizing the Secretary of Agriculture to erect a building for the Department *“in accordance with plans to be procured within the Imvit of cost, hereby fixed,”'*$1,500,000, did not ratify and adopt the plans for such a building prepared by the claimants under the act 2d March, 1901. The act 9th February, 1903, related to a new and distinct transaction.

The decision of the court below is affirmed on the same grounds.

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court May 2, 1910.
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101945 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate
Account One of our report dated March 26, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company, and of our report
dated February 21, 2003, relating to the financial statements of Hartford Life
and Annuity Insurance Company Separate Account One, appearing in the Statement
of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in
such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
Order entered July 12, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00283 - CV IN THE ESTATE OF LOLA CHENOWITH, DECE ASED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. Pr - 12 - 00202 - 2



### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s July 10, 2013 second motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief, which is unopposed. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant to file her brief by July 25, 2013. No further extensions will be granted abs ent a showing of exceptional circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit No. 11


                                    CNS, INC.

               Computation of Net Income per Share of Common Stock
                                   (unaudited)

                                                    Three months ended March 31,
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                        1997           1996
                                                    -----------     -----------

NET INCOME
  Income from continuing operations                 $ 1,321,493     $ 3,100,937
  Loss from discontinued operations                           0               0
                                                    -----------     -----------

Net income                                          $ 1,321,493     $ 3,100,937
                                                    ===========     ===========


PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
  Weighted average number of common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding       19,205,000      17,446,000
    Incentive stock options                             520,000         709,000
    Non qualified stock options                         319,000         399,000
    Warrants                                                  0          75,000
                                                    -----------     -----------

                                                     20,044,000      18,629,000
                                                    ===========     ===========

  Earnings per share from continuing operations     $       .07     $       .17
  Loss per share from discontinued  operations              .00             .00
                                                    -----------     -----------

Primary earnings per share                          $       .07     $       .17
                                                    ===========     ===========



FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
  Weighted average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding       19,205,000      17,446,000
    Incentive stock options                             520,000         756,000
    Non qualified stock options                         319,000         426,000
    Warrants                                                  0          78,000
                                                    -----------     -----------

                                                     20,044,000      18,706,000
                                                    ===========     ===========

  Earnings per share from continuing operations     $       .07     $       .17
  Loss per share from discontinued operations               .00             .00
                                                    -----------     -----------

Fully diluted earnings per share                    $       .07     $       .17
                                                    ===========     ===========
#### RINER, tax-collector, *v.*FLANDERS, ordinary.

No. 8697.

January 16, 1932.

*184
      *J. L. Kent, C. S. Claxton,*and *J. W. Claxton,*for plaintiff.

*A. L. Hatcher, E. L. Stephens,*and *Alton L. Hatcher,*for defendant.

Hill, J.

Riner, tax-collector, filed a petition for a writ of prohibition against W. J. Flanders, ordinary of Johnson County, alleging that he was elected tax-collector of Johnson County in November, 1928, for four years, and gave the required bond; that-on July 7, 1931, the ordinary cited the tax-collector and his bondsmen to make settlement of his accounts for the year 1930. The ordinary filed a demurrer, which was sustained by the court, and the petition was dismissed. Exceptions to this judgment were taken. A motion to dismiss the writ of error was made in the Supreme Court, on the ground that since the judgment of the superior court sustaining the demurrer there has been a full, final, and complete settlement of the 1930 digest by the plaintiff and the defendant; that, after the judgment sustaining the demurrer, the plaintiff and defendant agreed that the ordinary of Laurens County should preside and hear the issues between the parties as to all taxes included in the 1930 digest that were in issue, and the ordinary of Laurens County rendered a judgment settling all of the issues between the parties in this case; that because of said settlement there is nothing now before the Supreme Court for it to pass on, and a decision in said case would avail nothing.

To the motion to dismiss the plaintiff in error filed an answer in which it is admitted that the ordinary of Laurens County heard the issues between the parties for the years 1927, 1928, 1929, and 1930, but it is alleged that “counsel for Dr. Flanders refused to allow him to hear for the years 1925 and 1926, and left the years 1925 and 1926 undisposed of. The said Nat Riner claimed credit for various amounts for both of. said years, and that 1925 and 1926 were included in the citation of April 1, 1930, the original of which is hereto attached to show that fact.” The citation in the present case was issued by W. J. Flanders, ordinary, in July, 1931, and is specifically limited to a settlement of the tax-digest for the year 1930.

It appearing that the issue involved has been settled, it has become moot, and the writ of error must be

*Dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8021 

To amend Public Law 86–272 to expand the prohibition of State taxation 

relating to certain solicitation of orders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2024 

Mr. FITZGERALD (for himself, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. STEIL) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 86–272 to expand the prohibition 

of State taxation relating to certain solicitation of orders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Interstate Commerce 

5 Simplification Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 101(d) of Public Law 86—272 (73 Stat. 

8 555) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

10 end, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 8021 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (2) by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(3) the term ‘solicitation of orders’ means any 

5 business activity that facilitates the solicitation of 

6 orders even if that activity may also serve some 

7 independently valuable business function apart from 

8 solicitation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB