alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1630 Cranial motion measurement device. ( a ) *Identification.* A cranial motion measurement device is a prescription device that utilizes accelerometers to measure the motion or acceleration of the skull. These measurements are not to be used for diagnostic purposes.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The technical parameters of the device, hardware and software, must be fully characterized and include the following information: ( i ) Hardware specifications must be provided. Additionally, verification and validation testing as well as a hazard analysis must be performed.
( ii ) Software must be described in detail in the Software Requirements Specification (SRS) and Software Design Specification (SDS). Additionally, software verification and validation testing as well as a hazard analysis must be performed.
( 2 ) The device parts that contact the patient must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 3 ) The device must be designed and tested for electrical, thermal, and mechanical safety, and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).
( 4 ) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate the accuracy, precision, stability, and repeatability of measuring cranial motion per the intended use in the intended use environment.
( 5 ) The labeling must include: ( i ) The intended use population and the intended use environment.
( ii ) Instructions for technicians to convey to patients regarding the collection of cranial acceleration data to ensure device measurement accuracy, precision, stability, and repeatability.
( iii ) Information allowing clinicians to understand potential sources of variability in the measurement to help recognize and identify changes in the measurement.
[82 FR 35071, July 28, 2017]
EXHIBIT 4.1



                                January 14, 2002

ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS                           OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

        NUMBER                                             INTEREST(S)

                       Performance Capital Management, LLC

                      The Operating Agreement of the company
                        contains restrictions on transfer.

This Certifies that _______________________________________________is the
Registered holder of _________________ Membership Interest(s) of the above named
Company, transferable only on the books of the Company by the holder hereof in
person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed and
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Articles of Organization and
the Operating Agreement of the Company, as amended to the date of transfer,
copies of which may be inspected and copied during normal business hours at the
principal office of the Company.

     In Witness Whereof, the said Company has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized Manager(s) or Officer(s) and its Seal to be
hereunto affixed

this _______________ day                    of ______________ A.D. ____

_______________________                    _________________________



<PAGE>
     For Value Received, ____________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto ________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________Membership
Interests represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint
_______________________________________________________________Attorney
to transfer the said Membership Interests on the books of the within named
Company with full power of substitution in the premises.
     Dated _________________     ________

          In presence of               NOTICE:  THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT
______________________________   MUST  CORRESPOND  WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON
                                 THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR
______________________________   WITHOUT  ALTERATION  OR  ENLARGEMENT,  OR  ANY
                                 CHANGE WHATEVER.


<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1140 Ophthalmic chair. ( a ) *Identification.* An ophthalmic chair is an AC-powered or manual device with adjustable positioning in which a patient is to sit or recline during ophthalmological examination or treatment.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I. The AC-powered device and the manual device are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9. The manual device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[55 FR 48441, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 63012, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38810, July 25, 2001]
# C_2014112EN.01005301.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/53

---

Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Deutsche Post AG v OHIM

(Case T-102/14)

2014/C 112/68

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: K. Hamacher and C. Giersdorf, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: PostNL Holding BV (Den Haag, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 December 2013 in Case R 2108/2012 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 December 2013 in Case R 2108/2012 1;

| — | order the defendant and, as the case may be, the other party to the proceedings, to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and, as the case may be, the other party to the proceedings, to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Deutsche Post AG

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘TPG POST’ for goods and services in Classes 6, 9, 16, 20, 35, 38 and 39 (Community trade mark registration No 2 920 916)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and Community word marks ‘DP’, ‘POST’ and ‘Deutsche Post’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 14, 16, 25, 28, 35, 36, 38, 39 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Plea in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Plea in law:

---
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                ----------------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 13, 2003

                                 SRS LABS, INC.
             (Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

           Delaware                       0-21123                33-0714264
(State or other jurisdiction    (Commission File Number)       (IRS Employer
      of incorporation)                                      Identification No.)

           2909 Daimler Street
         Santa Ana, California                                     92705
(Address of principal executive offices)                         (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (949) 442-1070

                                 Not Applicable
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>

Item 7. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.       Description
-----------       -----------

99                Press Release, dated as of May 13, 2003.

Item 9.   Regulation FD Disclosure.

     The information contained in this Item 9 is provided under Item 12 of Form
8-K, "Results of Operations and Financial Condition."

     On May 13, 2003, SRS Labs, Inc. (the "Company") issued a press release
announcing its operating results for the first quarter of the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2003. Attached as Exhibit 99 to this report is a copy of the
Company's press release, which is incorporated herein by reference.


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                           SRS LABS, INC,
                                           a Delaware corporation

Date: May 13, 2003                     By:          /S/ THOMAS C. K. YUEN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                      Thomas C. K. Yuen
                                                Chairman of the Board and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                      -2-
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 8, 2015

NO. 03-15-00165-CV

NCM Acquisitions, LLC, Appellant

v.

Thomas Dwayne Odell, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on February 24, 2015. 

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court 

agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses 

the appeal. Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and 

in the court below.
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5180 Rocking bed. ( a ) *Identification.* A rocking bed is a device intended for temporary use to help patient ventilation (breathing) by repeatedly tilting the patient, thereby using the weight of the abdominal contents to move the diaphragm.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 868.9.
[47 FR 31142, July 16, 1982, as amended at 84 FR 71811, Dec. 30, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5955 Intermittent mandatory ventilation attachment. ( a ) *Identification.* An intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) attachment is a device attached to a mechanical ventilator that allows spontaneous breathing by a patient while providing mechanical ventilation at a preset rate.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
#### § 822.28 If I stop marketing the device subject to postmarket surveillance, what must I do?

You must continue to conduct postmarket surveillance in accordance with your approved plan even if you no longer market the device. You may request that we allow you to terminate postmarket surveillance or modify your postmarket surveillance because you no longer market the device. We will make these decisions on a case-by-case basis, and you must continue to conduct the postmarket surveillance unless we notify you that you may stop your surveillance study.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27

                       [REGISTER.COM LOGO]




                                                               November 26, 2002

Walt Meffert
c/o Register.com, Inc.
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

November 26, 2002

RE: Amendment to October 8, 2001 Offer Letter
    -----------------------------------------

Dear Walt:

         This letter hereby amends and restates Paragraph 11, regarding your
eligibility of a severance payment upon your termination of your employment with
the Company without Cause, of the offer letter dated October 8, 2001 (the "Offer
Letter") between you and Register.com, Inc. (the "Company") as follows:

         11. Severance. Notwithstanding that your status would be as an at-will
employee, in the event the Company terminates your employment without Cause (as
defined above) at any time following the start date of your employment, (A) you
will be eligible to receive the base salary you would have been entitled to
receive for a period of twelve (12) months from the effective date of notice of
termination; (B) you will be eligible to receive three (3) months of medical and
dental coverage; and (C) any remaining amount due under the loan for relocation
expenses referred to in Section 3 above will become repayable in equal annual
installments such that the last payment will be made on the fifth anniversary of
your start date.

         You acknowledge and agree that the Offer Letter as hereby amended
represents the complete understanding of the terms of your employment and you
are not relying on any discussions or agreements outside of the Offer Letter as
hereby amended. Changes in the terms of your employment may be modified only in
a document signed by the parties and referring explicitly to the Offer Letter as
hereby amended.

         If the above accurately reflects our agreement, kindly so signify by
signing the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided below and
returning it to the undersigned.


Walt Meffert                            Register.com, Inc.


   /s/ Walt Meffert                     By:   /s/ Richard D. Forman
   ----------------                           ------------------------------
                                              Name: Richard D. Forman
                                              Title: President and CEO
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7864 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to treat certain merchandise as unused 

merchandise for drawback purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2024 

Ms. VAN DUYNE (for herself and Ms. SEWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to treat certain 

merchandise as unused merchandise for drawback purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MERCHANDISE AS 

4 UNUSED FOR DRAWBACK PURPOSES. 

5 Section 313(j)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

6 U.S.C. 1313(j)(5)) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(5)(A) For purposes of paragraphs (1)(B) and 

8 (2)(C), merchandise shall be considered as not having 

9 been used within the United States if the merchandise 

10 is— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7864 IH

1 ‘‘(i) returned to inventory; 

2 ‘‘(ii) commingled with merchandise that has not 

3 been used within the United States; and 

4 ‘‘(iii) treated in the normal course of business 

5 without distinction from unused merchandise. 

6 ‘‘(B) Merchandise described in subparagraph (A) is 

7 not eligible for drawback under subsection (c)(1)(C)(ii).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.5770 Tracheal tube fixation device. ( a ) *Identification.* A tracheal tube fixation device is a device used to hold a tracheal tube in place, usually by means of straps or pinch rings.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 868.9.
[47 FR 31142, July 16, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 1120, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38795, July 25, 2001]
# C_2017283EN.01003001.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — Rosenich v EUIPO

(Case T-527/14) (1)

1

((Internal market - Decision of EUIPO rejecting a request for inclusion on the list of professional representatives - Condition relating to the existence of a place of business within the European Union - Article 93(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Freedom to provide services - Article 36 of the EEA Agreement - Consistent interpretation))

(2017/C 283/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Paul Rosenich (Triesenberg, Liechtenstein) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and C. Eckhartt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: initially, G. Schneider and, subsequently, D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2014 (Case R 2063/2012-4), concerning the refusal of EUIPO to enter the applicant on the list of professional representatives provided for in Article 93 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the European Union trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 April 2014 (Case R 2063/2012-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 April 2014 (Case R 2063/2012-4);

| 2. | Annuls the decision of the Director of the Operations Support Department of EUIPO of 7 September 2012; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of the Director of the Operations Support Department of EUIPO of 7 September 2012;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 22.12.2014.

1

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Earnest Lee Miles, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-21-00120-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 20-

0111X). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Stevens

and Justice Carter* participating. *Justice 

Carter, Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s nunc pro tunc judgment to 

reflect that sentence was imposed on July 20, 2021, rather than July 26, 2021. As modified, the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Earnest Lee Miles, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 22, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
69–008 

115TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 115–126 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 115) TO AMEND TITLE 

18, UNITED STATES CODE, TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AGGRAVATING 

FACTORS FOR THE IMPOSITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY BASED ON 

THE STATUS OF THE VICTIM 

MAY 16, 2017.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BUCK, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 323] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 323, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 115, the Thin 

Blue Line Act, under a closed rule. The resolution provides one 

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The 

resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The resolution provides that an amendment in the nature of 

a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115– 

17 shall be considered as adopted and the bill, as amended, shall 

be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended. The resolution provides 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill, the Committee is not aware of any points of 

order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 

Although the resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, the Committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with REPORTS