CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the May 5 , 2015

, grant of exemption of Exemption No. 11462 . A

correction was made to revise the type of aircraft to the Airworthiness Certification section

and to Condition No. #1. Below is the amended Exemption No. 11462 that inclu des the aforementioned change. We made the correction in our records as of May 19 , 2015.

May 5, 2015

Exemption No. 11462 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 0269

Mr. Gabriel Dobbs Director of Policy Skycatch, Inc.

524 3 rd Street San Francisco, CA 94107

Dear Mr. Dobbs :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Dec ision

By letter dated January 20, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behalf of Skycatch, Inc. ( hereinafter petitioner or operator ) for an exemption

. The exemption would all ow the petitioner to operate an unmanned ai rcraft system (UAS) to

conduct aerial imaging of crop health and other agricultural use cases

.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA des cribing the proposed operations and

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption

.2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Airworthine ss Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a fixed wing Skycatch aircraft

.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates . In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of P ublic Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the

aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from

14 CFR part 21

, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Ai rworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection

. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption No s

. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Do cket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab s , Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or

crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 ;

• The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and

11 213 also apply to the situation you present; and

• A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Skycatch, Inc. is granted an exemption from 14 CFR3

§§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed belo w.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Skycatch, Inc. is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the fixed wing Skycatch aircraft when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will requ ire a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption

.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are

not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use hu man vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times ;

e lectronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.4

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations herein take precede nce and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updat ed and revised documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FA A’s UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding u pdates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such

a manner so as to not pose an u ndue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the

UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohib ited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements f or the aircraft and

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pi lot certificate. The PIC must also hold a5

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Col u mbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the f light revi ew requirements specified in

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner co nsistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During

traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons n ot essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbo l as denoted on the current

FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or ot herwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS sign al, the UA must return to a

pre

- determined location within the pr ivate or controlled

- access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct th e intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.6

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All operations shall be cond ucted in accordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct operations that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA

.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must b e identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N− Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the s afe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These

documents must be made available to the Administr ator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. Th e operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring t he safety of nonparticipating persons ; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects an d determined that it does not present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or control led

- access property with permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgre sses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported7

to the FA A's UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) pe r instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions a nd limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a writt en Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the a rea of proposed filming. The 3

- day notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities

must include at least the followi ng:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of th e person responsible for the on

- scene operation of the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of thos e who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which filmi ng will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the

exempt ion holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to,

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.8

This exemption terminat es on April 30, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards ServiceJanuary 20 , 201 5 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam:

Attached please find Skycatch, Inc. ’s request for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations to allow commercial operation of its Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“ sUASs ”) for aerial imaging for safety and monitoring of secured and

controlled environment agricultural sites. This exemption request is exclusiv ely for the use of the UAS manufactured by Skycatch, Inc., a San Francisco based company.

Also attached to this letter is the Skycatch UAS Flight Manual, which outlines the operating requirements, limitations, and technical specifications for the Skycatc h system

. Skycatch submits this manual as a Confidential document under 14 CFR 11.35 (b) as the entire manual contains proprietary information that the applicant has not and w ill not

share with others. The M anual contains operating conditions and procedur es that are not available to the public and are protected from release under the Freedom of Information

Act 5 USC 552 et. seq.

Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Gabriel Dobbs

Di rector of Policy Skycatch, Inc.1 January 2 0 , 201 5 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b); 91.103(b); 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.417 (a) & (b).

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Skycatch

, a commerc ial UAS manufacturer

, hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“ sUAS ”) for aerial imaging of crop health and other agricultural use cases , so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

As detailed in this document and the attached Flight Manual , the requested exemption would permit the ope ration of sUAS under controlled conditions in airspace that is 1) limited 2) predetermined 3) controlled as to access and 4) would provide safety enhancements to the already best practices safety protocols followed by Skycatch

. Approval of this exemption w ould thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section

333 (c) of the Refor m Act.

The name and address of the applicant is:

Skycatch, Inc.

524 3 rd St., San Francisco, CA 94107

PH: 415

- 686

- 1119

Email: gabe@skycatch.com

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 C

. F

. R

. Part 21 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b)

14 C

. F

. R

. 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a)

14 C

. F

. R

. 91.9 (b) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91.103

14 C.F.R. 91.109

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121

14 C

. F

. R

. 91.151 (a)

14 C

. F

. R

. 91.203 (a) & (b)2 14 C

. F

. R

. 91.405 (a)

14 C

. F

. R

. 407 (a) (1)

14 C

. F

. R

. 409 (a) (2)

14 C

. F

. R

. 417 (a) & (b)

**I. STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR EXEMPTIONS** 

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under §40101 of the Act, including s UA S s
, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must

have a current airworthiness certificate

. The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702

- 44716 o f this title if the Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. §44701(f) See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203(a) (1).

Section 333(b) of the Reform Act assists the S ecretary in determining whether

s UAS may opera te in the National Airspace System (NAS) without creating a hazard to the user, the public, or a threat to national security . If the Secretary determines that a

s UAS “may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall esta blish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id

. §333(c).

Skycatch’s s UAS are fixed wing aircraft , weighing 10 or fewer lbs. including payload. They operate under normal conditions at a speed of no more than 50 kn ots. The

sUAS will operate only in the Pilot’s visual line of sight at all times and will operate only

within the sterile area described in the Confidential Skycatch Flight Manual, attached as Exhibit 1 (hereinafter “the Manual”). Such operations will insu re that the s UAS will “not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public.” Reform Act Section 333 (b).

Given the small size of the sUAS involved and the restricted and sterile environment within which they will operate, our applic ation falls squarely within the zone of safety (an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial operations of s UAS to commence immediately.

Also due to the small size of the s UAS and the low altitudes and restricted areas in which

the s UAS will operate, approval of the application presents no national security issue.

Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended ; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, the grant of the requested exemptions is in the public interest. Accordingly, Skycatch respectfully requests that th e FAA grant the requested exemption without delay.

**II. PUBLIC INTEREST** 3 This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the NAS before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the

Reform Act. By granting an exemption the FAA will fulfill Congress’s intent of allowing UAS to operate with significant safety precautions in low risk environments.

The use of s UAS on a vineyard can significantly reduce the use of natural resources and the environmental impact of agriculture across the United States. The data collected with these UAVs will be used to greatly reduce the use of water in drought stricken areas like California, and can also catch crop diseas e early and prevent its spread. Skycatch’s fixed wing UAV is also magnitudes more energy efficient than much larger, petroleum fueled aircraft traditionally used for similar purposes.

Additionally, s UAS could replace the use of helicopters and small aircraft to

monitor sites. The s UAS we propose to fly in this application are under five pounds, and carry no combustible material on board , as opposed to the much larger conventionally powered small aircraft

. Shifting to s UAS from helicopters presents a marked safety increase for our workers and the public

. Lastly, s UAS reduce the environmental impact by dramatically decreasing the energy used for aerial imaging and data collection over a vineyard . Our s UAS use rechargeable lithium ion batteries, as opposed to foss il fuels burned in operation of small aircraft that are many hundreds of times heavier.

**III. EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY** 

Skycatch proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to sUAS that have the characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These limitations provide for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current regulatory structure because the proposed operations represent a s afety enhancement to the already safe protocols followed on vineyard s and imaging and surveying operations conducted with helicopters and other conventional aircraft.

Skycatch will be bound by the following limitations when conducting its s UAS operations under an FAA issued exemption:

1. The s UAS will be less than 10 pounds.

2. Flights will be operated within visual line of sight of a pilot.

3. Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be 30 minutes. The UAS calculates battery reserve in real tim e, and will return to its ground station with at

least 20 % battery power reserve should that occur prior to the 30 minute limit.

4. Flights will normally be operated at an altitude of 200 feet AGL, never exceeding 400

feet AGL

. 5. C rew for each operation will consist of the s UAS Pilot who will keep the s UAS within his visual line of sight at all times.

6. The s UAS P ilot will be trained in flight, operations, and safety procedures as detailed in the Flight Manual

.4 7. The s UAS will only operate within a confined “Ste rile Area” as defined in the

Manual. The Manual also requires the establishment of a “Security Perimeter” for the flight operations area.

8. A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned s UAS operations prior to each day’s production activities. It w ill be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing duties within the boundaries of the safety perimeter be present for this briefing.

9. All onsite personnel will consent to the UAS flyover on site by waiver, and t he operator will obtain additional v erbal or written consent of all persons who will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation

. 10. Pilot will have been trained in operation of UAS s generally and received up

- to

- date information on the particular UAS to be operated as required by Section F of the

Manual.

11. Written and/or oral permission from the relevant property holders will be obtained.

12. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fir e, or other appropriate governmental agencies.

13. If the s UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it will have capability to stay within range of its takeoff point , reestablish satellite connection, and return to a

pre

- determined location within th e Security Perimeter and land.

**IV. DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC REGULATIONS**

**14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) : Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command** 

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non

- commercial operations. Because the

s UAS will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of safety of current operations by requiring the Pilot operating the

aircraft to have (1) completed a s UAS flight training course of 100 hours before flying a

s UAS (See Section F of the Manual for more details) and (2) a Sport Pilot certificate

. The FAA has previously acknowledged in prior grants of exemption under Section 333 that a commercial pilot’s certificate was not necessary to operate a sUA S , but that the FAA could not waive the requirement for an FAA

- issued pilot’s license. A Sport Pilot certificate addresses the FAA’s requirement that the Pilot in command have the requisite training and understanding of the National Airspace System, and also ensures tha t the Pilot is registered with the FAA and will not pose a risk to national security. The Sport Pilot certificate also does not require the Pilot to undertake the additional cost and time of additional manned aviation flight time that the Private Pilot’s l icense requires and which will not translate to skill or competency operating the sUA S

.

Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the s UAS is remotely controlled with no living thing or cargo on board. Skycatch’s sUAS is also operated by an autopilot, which greatly reduces the danger of human error. The area of operation is

controlled and restricted to hard hat areas , and all flights are planned and coordinated in

advance as set forth in the Manual.5 The sUAS to be operated her eunder is less than 10 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates exclusively within a secured area as set out in the Manual. Like other civil aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by the operator, pursuant to the Manual’s requirements, and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide security for the area of operation as is

currentl y done on active vineyard s . The FAA will have advance notice of all operations.

The risks associated with the operation of the s UAS are therefore diminished from the level of risk associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when

drafted

, and allowing operations of the s UAS as requested with a Pilot who has met the minimum requirements stated in Section F of the Manual achieves the level of safety contemplated by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b).

**14 C.F.R. 91.103 : Preflight Action** 

This regulation requires each pilot in command take certain actions before flight to

ensure the safety of flight. An exemption is needed from this requirement as the Pilot will take separate preflight actions, including checking for weather conditions, che cking flight battery requirements, checking takeoff and landing distances, and all other actions in the Preflight Checklist in the Manual . These actions will provide an equivalent level of safety. See Appendix A of the Manual.

**14 C.F. R. 91.119 : Minimum S**  **afe Altitudes**

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or alt itudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. This exemption is for a fixed wing air craft, which will typically operate at altitudes of 2 00 AGL , so an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. The s UAS will never operate at altitude higher than 4 00 AGL and will be in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre

- obtained consent. See Manual for detailed procedures

.

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the si ze, weight, speed of the s UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property

owner and any onsite personnel as outlined in the Manual , all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Unlike flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighing far more than the maximum 10 lbs. proposed herein , our sUAS will not carry flammable fuel. In addition, the low

- altitude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between s UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119.6 **14 C.F.R. 91.121 : Altimeter Settings** 

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the sUAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GP S altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the Manual and Safety Check list, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

**14 CFR 91.151 (a)**  **: Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions** Section 91.151 (a) outlines fuel requirements for beginning a flight in VFR conditions.

Our s UAS is limited to operations in sterile and controlled environments as outlined in the Manual, and h as a limited range and flight time which require an exemption from 14 CFR 91.151(a).

The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 35 minutes of powered flight. To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, sUAS flights would be

limit ed to approximately 5 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the s UAS ’s proposed flight area and the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in daylight or night VFR conditions is reasonable.

Sky catch believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate without compliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small s UAS , in a tightly

control led area where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the si ze and speed of the small UAS . Additionally, limiting sUAS flights to 10 minutes would greatly reduce the utility for which the exemption will be granted.

A n equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limi ting flights to 30 minutes

, or enough battery re serve to ensure that the sUAS lands at the ground station with at least 20 % of battery power (as determined by the onboard monitoring system and the Pilot ), whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS to its pla nned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area.

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, and 10808.

**14 CFR 91.405 (a) ; 407 (a)**  **(1) ; 409 (a)**  **(2) ;**  **417 (a) & (b) : Maintenance inspections** 

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaire d as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.7 Given that these section s and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to S kycatch . Maintenance will be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook as referenced in the

Manual. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these small s UAS are very limited in size and will carry a sm all payload and operate only in restricted areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the s UAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. As provided in the Manual, the Pilot

will ensure that the s UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the Pilot is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety.

*******

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed:

Applicant seeks an exemption from the following r ules: 14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b);14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113( a) & (b);91.7

(a); 91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) and (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55lbs or less) in agricultural operations.

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUAS in agriculture enhances safety while reducing risk

. Manned aircraft monitoring and surveying creates a greater risk because the craft are much larger, have combustible fuel, and carry an onboard human pilot. In contrast, a sUAS weighing fewer than 10 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all o f that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights.

The operation of small s UAS , weighing les s than 10 lbs., conducted in the strict conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the requirements of Part 21 and allowing commercia l operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground an d people.

**Privacy**

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner’s prior consent and knowledge. Images taken will be of individuals who have also consented to being filmed or otherwise have agreed to be in the are a where aerial photography will take place.8 *******

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012

-- size, weight, speed, operating capabilities, controlled operating environment and operation within visual line of sight an d national security

– provide more than adequate justification for the grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s

s UAS in agriculture pursuant to the Manual appended hereto.

Sincerely,

Gabriel Dobbs Director of Policy Skycatch, Inc.