9892 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 42 / Thursday, March 4, 2010 / Notices 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

The filings in the above proceedings 

are accessible in the Commission’s 

eLibrary system by clicking on the 

appropriate link in the above list. They 

are also available for review in the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room in 

Washington, DC. There is an 

eSubscription link on the Web site that 

enables subscribers to receive e-mail 

notification when a document is added 

to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance 

with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or 

call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, 

call (202) 502–8659. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4429 Filed 3–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

February 24, 2010. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER99–1005–005; 

ER09–304–002. 

Applicants: KCP&L Greater Missouri 

Operations Company; Kansas City 

Power & Light Company. 

Description: Kansas City Power & 

Light Co et al submits an amendment to 

their Triennial Market Power Filing for 

SPP Region and Tariff Filing. 

Filed Date: 02/23/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100224–0028. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER99–1435–021; 

ER00–1814–009. 

Applicants: Avista Corporation; 

Avista Turbine Power, Inc. 

Description: Notice of Non-Material 

Change in Status of Avista Corporation, 

et. al. Pursuant to Order 697–C. 

Filed Date: 01/29/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100129–5121. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Wednesday, March 17, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER99–1757–016. 

Applicants: Empire District Electric 

Company. 

Description: Affidavit of Julie R 

Solomon which updates her previous 

affidavit to address revised calculations 

by the SPP of the SIL for certain 

balancing authority areas etc re The 

Empire District Electric Company. 

Filed Date: 02/22/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100223–0032. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Monday, March 15, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER06–456–022; 

ER06–1271–017; ER06–880–017; ER06– 

954–018; ER07–1186–002; ER07–424– 

013; ER08–1065–002; ER08–1569–003; 

ER09–497–003; ER10–268–002; ER08– 

229–002. 

Applicants: PJM Interconnection 

L.L.C. 

Description: PJM Interconnection, 

LLC submits amendments to Schedule 

12 of its Open Access Transmission 

Tariff to incorporate the methodology 

for assigning cost responsibility to 

Merchant Transmission Facilities etc. 

Filed Date: 02/19/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100222–0216. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Friday, March 12, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–111–001. 

Applicants: Bangor Hydro-Electric 

Company. 

Description: Bangor Hydro Electric 

Company submits errata to 10/26/09 

filing. 

Filed Date: 02/23/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100224–0205. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–547–000. 

Applicants: Golden Spread Electric 

Cooperative, Inc. 

Description: Golden Spread Electric 

Cooperative, Inc submits corrected 

Second Revised Sheets 121 et al First 

Revised Rate Schedule 23. 

Filed Date: 02/23/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100223–0062. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–550–001. 

Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, 

Inc. 

Description: Southwest Power Pool, 

Inc submits amendment to its Dec 31 

filing to request that the Commission 

defer the effective date of the Tariff 

provisions proposed in the filing to 5/ 

1/10. 

Filed Date: 02/23/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100223–0061. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–589–001. 

Applicants: El Paso Electric Company. 

Description: El Paso Electric Company 

submits as requested the historical 

documents with the headers and footers 

required under Order 614 specification 

for tariff sheet designations. 

Filed Date: 02/23/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100224–0204. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–792–000. 

Applicants: TC Energy Trading, LLC. 

Description: Application of TC Energy 

Trading, LLC for market-based rate 

authority, associated waivers, blanket 

approvals, notification of price reporting 

status and request for Category 1 Seller 

Determination. 

Filed Date: 02/23/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100224–0210. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–793–000. 

Applicants: Wolverine Creek Goshen 

Interconnection, 

Description: Wolverine Creek Goshen 

Interconnection LLC et al submits First 

Amendment to the Common Facilities 

Agreement. 

Filed Date: 02/23/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100224–0203. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–794–000. 

Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc. 

Description: Entergy Services, Inc 

submits revisions to its open access 

tariff, FERC Electric Tariff. 

Filed Date: 02/23/2010. 

Accession Number: 20100224–0202. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest in any of the above proceedings 

must file in accordance with Rules 211 

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 

and 385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern 

time on the specified comment date. It 

is not necessary to separately intervene 

again in a subdocket related to a 

compliance filing if you have previously 

intervened in the same docket. Protests 

will be considered by the Commission 

in determining the appropriate action to 

be taken, but will not serve to make 

protestants parties to the proceeding. 

Anyone filing a motion to intervene or 

protest must serve a copy of that 

document on the Applicant. In reference 

to filings initiating a new proceeding, 

interventions or protests submitted on 

or before the comment deadline need 

not be served on persons other than the 

Applicant. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper, using the 

FERC Online links at http:// 

www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic 

service, persons with Internet access 

who will eFile a document and/or be 

listed as a contact for an intervenor 

must create and validate an 

eRegistration account using the 

eRegistration link. Select the eFiling 

link to log on and submit the 

intervention or protests. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 42 / Thursday, March 4, 2010 / Notices 9893 

of the intervention or protest to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

The filings in the above proceedings 

are accessible in the Commission’s 

eLibrary system by clicking on the 

appropriate link in the above list. They 

are also available for review in the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room in 

Washington, DC. There is an 

eSubscription link on the Web site that 

enables subscribers to receive e-mail 

notification when a document is added 

to a subscribed dockets(s). For 

assistance with any FERC Online 

service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4428 Filed 3–3–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[R08–CO–2010–0001; FRL–9121–8] 

Adequacy Determination for the 

Denver Metro Area and North Front 

Range 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Plan’s 

Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for 

Transportation Conformity Purposes; 

State of Colorado 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is 

notifying the public that the Agency has 

found that the motor vehicle emissions 

budgets for nitrogen oxides (NOX) and 

volatile organic compounds (VOC) 

contained in the Denver Metro Area and 

North Front Range 8-Hour Ozone 

Attainment Plan (hereafter ‘‘Denver/NFR 

Ozone Attainment Plan’’) are adequate 

for transportation conformity purposes. 

The Denver/NFR Ozone Attainment 

Plan was submitted to EPA as a revision 

to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

on June 18, 2009, by James B. Martin, 

Director, Colorado Department of Public 

Health and Environment. As a result of 

our finding, the Denver Regional 

Council of Governments (DRCOG), the 

North Front Range Metropolitan 

Planning Organization (NFR MPO), the 

Colorado Department of Transportation 

and the U.S. Department of 

Transportation are required to use these 

motor vehicle emissions budgets for 

future transportation conformity 

determinations once this finding 

becomes effective. 

DATES: This finding is effective March 

19, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim 

Russ, Air Program (8P–AR), United 

States Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop 

Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, 

(303) 312–6479, or russ.tim@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our,’’ are used, we mean 

EPA. 

This notice is simply an 

announcement of a finding that we have 

already made. EPA sent a letter to the 

Colorado Department of Public Health 

and Environment (CDPHE) on January 

21, 2010, stating that the motor vehicle 

emissions budgets (MVEB) in the 

submitted Denver/NFR Ozone 

Attainment Plan are adequate. The 

MVEBs in the Denver/NFR Ozone 

Attainment Plan were posted for 

adequacy review on EPA’s 

transportation conformity Web site on 

October 15, 2009. The public comment 

period closed on November 16, 2009 

and we did not receive any comments 

in response to the adequacy review 

posting (see http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ 

stateresources/transconf/ 

currsips.htm#denver-me). 

The MVEBs we found adequate are 

presented in the following table: 

Area of applicability 

2010 NOX

emissions 

(tons per day) 

2010 VOC 

emissions 

(tons per day) 

Northern Subarea 1 .................................................................................................................................................. 20.5 19.5 

Southern Subarea 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 102.4 89.7 

Total Nonattainment Area ................................................................................................................................ 122.9 109.2 

1 The Subareas are defined in section VI of the Denver/NFR Ozone Attainment Plan. 

As we stated in our January 21, 2010 

letter to CDPHE, the initial conformity 

determination must be done using the 

total nonattainment area MVEBs for 

NOX and VOCs. After the initial 

conformity determination, DRCOG and 

the NFR MPO may switch from using 

the total nonattainment area MVEBs to 

using the sub-area MVEBs for 

determining conformity. To switch to 

use of the sub-area MVEBs (or to 

subsequently switch back to use of the 

total nonattainment area MVEBs), 

DRCOG and the NFR MPO must use the 

process as described in the Denver/NFR 

Ozone Attainment Plan on pages VI–4 

through VI–6. 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

The conformity rule provisions at 40 

CFR part 93 require that transportation 

plans, programs, and projects conform 

to SIPs and establish the criteria and 

procedures for determining whether or 

not they do. Conformity to a SIP means 

that transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS). 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP’s MVEBs are adequate for 

conformity purposes are outlined in 40 

CFR 93.118(e)(4) which was 

promulgated August 15, 1997 (see 62 FR 

43780). We described our process for 

determining the adequacy of submitted 

SIP MVEBs in our July 1, 2004 

Transportation Conformity Rule 

Amendments (see 69 FR 40004). We 

used these resources in making our 

adequacy determination. Please note 

that our adequacy review is separate 

from our rulemaking action on the 

Denver/NFR Ozone Attainment Plan 

and should not be used to prejudge our 

ultimate approval or disapproval of the 

SIP revision. Even if we find a budget 

adequate, we may later disapprove the 

SIP. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES