alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMPARISON OF PELLETIZING MACHINES

• A comparison of Pelletizing machines is limited to the Trave ling Grate (Danieli, Outokumpu or Aker Kvaerner) and the Grat e/Kiln (Metso or Kobelco). Both machines are similar in producti on capability and capital costs.

• The operating cost for a Traveling Gr ate is approximately 34% cheaper for the following reasons:

o Energy consumption is lower by approximately 33% (reason is single
machine with fixed bed resu lting in less leakage). Ec onomic benefit is lower
costs. Additional benefit is that low-NOx burners we re not available for the single large burner on the kiln but are available for straight-grate system.

o Maintenance is approximately 14% lowe r (reason is fixed refractory and grate bar life above five years). Benefit is lo wer costs and higher availability by 6%;
and

o Manhours per ton are lower (reason is less equipment and better controls).
Benefit is lower costs.

• The quality of the product from the Traveling Grate is bette r than a Grate Kiln for DRI production for four reasons:

o Low silica – magnetite green ball with 1% limestone will require complete calcination/oxidation prior to indurati on to faciliate achieving overall pellet quality.

o Lower % minus 1/4 inch B.T. (reason is fixed bed – no transfers);

o Higher porosity thus higher reducibilit y (reason is no compaction from the rolling action in kiln); and

o The Traveling Grate has greater tur ndown capability because it does not have the refractory lined kiln. Execution time for the Traveling Grate is dictated by the Process Fans, not a kiln. A key fact or for Phase I to Phase II transition.

• The overall conclusion is the Traveling Grate is the best cost-effective and quality option for producing DRI/HBI feedstock.Comparison of Pelletizing Machines @ 2.4 mtpa
Traveling Grate Grate/Kiln Manufacturers Danieli & others Metso & Kolbelco
Design Capacity available, mtpa *Minimum 2.0 2.0 *Maximum 6.5 6.0
Capital Costs, $/annual ton $40 $40
Cash Operating Costs, % 100% 134%
Availability, % 94% 89%
Pellet Quality *Tumble Index, + 1⁄4, % 96% 95% *Porosity, % 32% 28%

Facts

Installation *Installed Capacity, mtpa 198 127 *Operating Capacity, % 86% 61% *DRI Feedstock, % 65% 14% *Capacity Shutdown, % 14% 49% *Under Construction, mtpa 26 ---
Operating Cost, $/ton *Bentonite, #/t 20 20 *Electrical, kwh/t 29 25 *Natural Gas, mmbtu/t 0.25 0.36 *Maintenance, % 100% 114% *Labor, mhrs/t 0.047 0.066
Binder Flexibility Yes Yes

Maximum Turndown, % 80% 40%
Project Execution, months 18 24
Start-Up Duration, months 10 10
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1900 Evoked response auditory stimulator. ( a ) *Identification.* An evoked response auditory stimulator is a device that produces a sound stimulus for use in evoked response measurements or electroencephalogram activation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
Editorial Note on Part 890
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 890 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 890.1600 Intermittent pressure measurement system. ( a ) *Identification.* An intermittent pressure measurement system is an evaluative device intended for medical purposes, such as to measure the actual pressure between the body surface and the supporting media.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 890.9.
[48 FR 53047, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 1125, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38816, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.3730 Pacemaker service tools. ( a ) *Identification.* Pacemaker service tools are devices such as screwdrivers and Allen wrenches, used to repair a pacemaker lead or to reconnect a pacemaker lead to a pacemaker generator.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
[45 FR 7907, Feb. 5, 1980, as amended at 54 FR 25049, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38797, July 25, 2001]
#### §§ 900.8-900.9 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

          - [A-570-945]

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 13, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Ray or Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5403 or (202) 482-3927, respectively.

## Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures

                        On December 29, 2009, and January 4, 2010, Xinhua Metal Products Co., Ltd. (“Xinhua Metals”) and Wuxi Jinyang Metal Products Co., Ltd. (“WJMP”) requested that pursuant to the affirmative preliminary determination in this investigation, the Department postpone its final determination by 60 days under section 735(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”). Xinhua Metals and WJMP also requested that the Department extend the application of the provisional measures prescribed under 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) from a 4-month period to a 6-month period. In accordance with section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b), because (1) Our preliminary determination is affirmative, (2) the requesting exporters account for a significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise, and (3) no compelling reasons for denial exist, we are granting the request and are postponing the final determination until no later than 135 days after the publication of the preliminary determination notice in the                         **Federal Register**                        , or May 7, 2010. Suspension of liquidation will be extended accordingly. This determination is issued and published in accordance with section 735(d) of the Act.                    

Dated: January 7, 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-491 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
§ 522.1315 Maropitant. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 10 milligrams (mg) maropitant as maropitant citrate.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Dogs* — ( i ) *Amount.* Administer 1.0 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight by subcutaneous or intravenous injection once daily for up to 5 consecutive days.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* For the prevention and treatment of acute vomiting.
( iii ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
( 2 ) *Cats* — ( i ) *Amount.* Administer 1.0 mg/kg of body weight by subcutaneous or intravenous injection once daily for up to 5 consecutive days.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of vomiting.
( iii ) *Limitations.* Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[72 FR 9243, Mar. 1, 2007, as amended at 77 FR 39391, July 3, 2012; 79 FR 16191, Mar. 25, 2014; 81 FR 22524, Apr. 18, 2016]
Exhibit 13





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Coca-Cola European Partners plc, a public limited company organized under the laws of England and Wales (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:


The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








_____/s/ Damian Gammell_______


Damian Gammell


Chief Executive Officer


11 April 2017








_____/s/ Nik Jhangiani_________


Nik Jhangiani


Chief Financial Officer


11 April 2017
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule Ihereto, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule Ihereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2017 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule Ihereto)
(the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability companyBy

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident






1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700  Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601



---

Schedule I

CGCMT 2015-P1

Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-P1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1

Citibank,N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York, NY 10013

Cirino Emanuele

Citibank,N.A.,

Global Transaction Services

388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor

New York NY 10013

John Hannon

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

390 Greenwich
Street, 5th Floor

New York NY 10013

Paul Vanderslice

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 19th Floor

New York NY 10013

Richard Simpson

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

388 Greenwich
Street, 17th Floor

New York NY 10013

Ryan M. OConnor

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas

Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company

Trust & Agency Services

1761 E. Saint Andrew Place

Santa Ana CA 92705

James Noriega

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor

New York NY 10016

David Rodgers

Park Bridge Lender Services LLC

600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor

Att: CGCMT 2015-P1

New York NY 10016
§ 884.4270 Vibratory cervical dilators. ( a ) *Identification.* A vibratory cervical dilator is a device designed to dilate the cervical os by stretching it with a power-driven vibrating probe head. The device is used to gain access to the uterus or to induce abortion, but is not to be used during labor when a viable fetus is desired or anticipated.
( b ) *Classification.* Class III (premarket approval).
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before December 26, 1996 for any vibratory cervical dilator that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before December 26, 1996 been found to be substantially equivalent to a vibratory cervical dilator that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other vibratory cervical dilator shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[45 FR 12684, Feb. 26, 1980, as amended at 52 FR 17741, May 11, 1987; 61 FR 50708, Sept. 27, 1996]
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 1:37 PM

To: 'TDeering@semprautilities.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - San Diego Gas and Electric Company

Ms. Deering,

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2014‐0719‐

0013).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.  

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the proposed UAS

operation.  The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be located

in the aircraft manual(s).  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/18/15.  If we do not receive

the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.  

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.2850 Extravascular blood pressure transducer. ( a ) *Identification.* An extravascular blood pressure transducer is a device used to measure blood pressure by changes in the mechanical or electrical properties of the device. The proximal end of the transducer is connected to a pressure monitor that produces an analog or digital electrical signal related to the electrical or mechanical changes produced in the transducer.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
#### Lee STERLING and Thomas LaPiana, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Housing Council of New York, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD OF the CITY OF NEW YORK and the City of New York, Defendants-Appel-lees.

Docket 85-7229.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 7, 1986.

*9Before NEWMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and COFFRIN,* District Judge.

*

The Hon. Albert W. Coffrin, Judge, District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Appellees suggest that we

> may have overlooked [appellees’] argument ... that a significant number of multiple dwellings have a resident janitor or superintendent on the premises who, unlike a tenant, may be reasonably expected to look after their employer’s interests by forwarding the notice of violation to him. Since superintendents would be actively engaged in their duties at the premises during the same business hours when the SEA would post the notice, and, in most instances, are actual residents of the building, the likelihood of the janitor or superintendent seeing a notice affixed to the front door ... is very great.

Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing at 2. Ap-pellees also bring to our attention, for the first time, provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, Section D26-22.03 (Williams Press 1977, vol. 4 at 474 & Supp. 1985-1986 at 166), requiring owners of a multiple dwelling with nine or more units to provide full-time janitorial services.

We believe appellees’ argument to be without merit. The magistrate specifically found that “in New York City, paper notices affixed to [multiple dwellings] have a very short life span, regardless of whether they are affixed out of the reach of small children.” The presence of a janitor or superintendent somewhere in the building, therefore, only marginally improves the chances that a landlord will receive the “nailed” summons. Moreover, the newly-cited ordinance requires only that a janitor live in the same block, albeit the owners must maintain in each building a sign with the janitor’s name, address and telephone number.

Appellees’ argument might carry weight had the provisions for nail and mail service provided, as they might easily have done, that the “nailed” summons be given directly to the superintendent or the janitor in a multiple dwelling. It contained no such requirement, however. Instead, it left it to chance that such a person would happen upon the “nailed” summons during its “very short life span.”

The petition for rehearing is therefore denied.
# C_2015089EN.01004401.xml

| 16.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/44

---

Order of the General Court of 27 January 2015 — Hamas v Council

(Case T-702/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 089/53)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 395, 10.11.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1030 Ataxiagraph. ( a ) *Identification.* An ataxiagraph is a device used to determine the extent of ataxia (failure of muscular coordination) by measuring the amount of swaying of the body when the patient is standing erect and with eyes closed.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). Except when the device is intended to provide an interpretation or a clinical implication of the measurement, it is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 882.9.
[44 FR 51730, Sept. 4, 1979, as amended at 66 FR 46952, Sept. 10, 2001; 84 FR 71815, Dec. 30, 2019]
Order entered March 4 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00414
- CV
MARY HELEN WILLIAMS
- WHITE, Appellant
V. HENRY M. WHITE, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. FA
- 12
- 0829 

### O RDER
We GRANT the February 27, 2014 motion of Cindy Bardwell, Official Court Reporter for the 59th Judicial District Court of Grayson County, Texas, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed on or before APRIL 2, 2014 . No further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1430 Ophthalmic contact lens radius measuring device. ( a ) *Identification.* An ophthalmic contact lens radius measuring device is an AC-powered device that is a microscope and dial gauge intended to measure the radius of a contact lens.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
[55 FR 48442, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 63013, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38811, July 25, 2001]
SERVE D FEBRUAR Y 16,201 2 ..,,, , ^~ 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ],-:i^^'^?^':iJ^[(Viy^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS . v..--. OKER.TIOi-lo 

WASHINGTON, DC j-^n p.^ 7 , A iO: 0 3 

In The Matter Of: 

DEAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2011-0069 

(Civil Penally Proceeding) 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On February 10, 2012 the Complainant, the Federal Aviation AdminisUaiion 

(FAA) filed a Settlement Agreement with the OfYice of Hearings. This Settlement 

Agreement was dated and signed by both the FAA and Respondent Dean International, 

Inc., and stated that the parties had reached full and final settlement on ail claims in the 

litigation. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1) The Telephone Motion Conference set for April 12, 2012 (1:30pm EST) is 

cancelled. 

2) The Hearing.scheduled for April 24, 2012 - April 26, 2012 (9:00am - 4:30pm 

EST) in Miami, Florida, is cancelled. 

3) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, this proceeding is disn-\isscd with prejudice. 

jllivan 

i^trative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-0069 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Stuart A. Goldstein. Respondenl 's Counsel 

Law Offices of Goldstein & Sordo 

9350South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor 

Miami, FL 33156 

TEL: 305-670-1222 

FAX: 305-670-7065 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J. E. ^\\\\\\a.\\. Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC^30.
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3235 Epstein-Barr virus serological reagents. ( a ) *Identification.* Epstein-Barr virus serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infections and provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these viruses. Epstein-Barr viruses are thought to cause infectious mononucleosis and have been associated with Burkitt's lymphoma (a tumor of the jaw in African children and young adults) and postnasal carcinoma (cancer).
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls).
§ 898.12 Performance standard. ( a ) Any connector in a cable or electrode lead wire having a conductive connection to a patient shall be constructed in such a manner as to comply with subclause 56.3(c) of the following standard: International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 601-1: Medical Electrical Equipment 601-1 (1988) Part 1: General requirements for safety Amendment No. 1 (1991) Amendment No. 2 (1995).
( b ) Compliance with the standard shall be determined by inspection and by applying the test requirements and test methods of subclause 56.3(c) of the standard set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.