alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1062
BRUCE E. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID L. SMITH; VI RGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DR. CEI; DR. KAPIL; EDWARD CAREY, Doctor; DR. AMMONETTE; E. C. MORRIS; DOCTOR WALKER, Bland Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge; Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-93-582-R) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce E. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Christine Maggard, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Anderson v. Smith , No. CA-93-582-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 8, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: March 2, 2010. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Valerie J. Best, Assistant Executive Secretary.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10188
Carson River Community Bank
Carson City
NV
2/26/201010189
Rainier Pacific Bank
Tacoma
WA
2/26/2010


[FR Doc. 2010-4798 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Attachment 4

Industry Position Papers:

API/NPRA/WSPA Flare Sulfur Analyzer RATA Testing Position 11-19-09 API/NPRA/WSPA Flare Seal Monitoring Position 11-19-09API/NPRA/WSPA Flare Sulfur Analyzer RATA Testing Position 11-19-09

Subpart Ja requires Relative Accuracy Test Audits (RATAs) of the flare sulfur monitors because it applies Appendix F requirements to these monitors. RATA testing flares is problematic for the following reasons.

1. Sources will be required to bypass flare gas recovery or route process or fuel gas to the flare and do significant flar ing in order to provide the required representative samples for the RATA tests. Significant, unnecessary VOC, SO 2 and NOx emissions will result.

2. There is a potential safety risk to sampling personnel, should an emergency flaring event occur while they are sampling the flare header. While flare headers are normally at low pressures, backpressure can be signifi cant during flaring even ts and exposure to toxics and potentially fire risk is a concern if an event o ccurs during RATA testing. The concern is amplified by the fact that in many cases these samples must be taken at difficult to access locations, making emergency escape difficult.

3. Because flares typically can receive gas from many different sources, with widely varying compositions and sulfur contents, the flare sulfur monitors will have to cover a broad range and deal with very different gas compositions. It will therefore be difficult to generate “representative” samples for RATA testing from individual refinery streams.

4. Under some State rules, Consent Decrees and permits, flaring is only permitted during

certain conditions and the on- purpose RATA testing flari ng would be construed as violating these conditions w ithout regulatory revisions.

These concerns have been addressed in Califor nia by allowing Cylinder Gas Audits in place of the RATA tests for these analyzers and we r ecommend the Agency do the same in Subpart Ja.Page 1 API/NPRA/WSPA Flare Seal Mo nitoring Position 11-19-09

NSPS Ja requires flare gas flow monitoring. AP I/NPRA/WSPA recommended use of flare seal monitoring as an alternate to flow monitoring in certain situations . In gathering data to support that request, we have also found that flare seal monitoring can be important for eliminating false flow monitor readings on some flares. This is based on the logic that if the flare seal is not breached, then there is no flow to the fl are from upstream of the flare seal.

Experience in California shows that flare gas flow monitors can indicate a flow even where there is none. This is presumably an artifact of th e detection limit of the m easurement technology. In large flare headers, even a very low indicated fl ow can cause the RCA trigger for sulfur dioxide to be incorrectly exceeded. SCAQMD and BAAQMD have accepted flare seal monitoring (level

and Δ P) as proof of false positive flare gas flow monitor readings.

We therefore now request that flare drum seal monitoring be allowed as a voluntary supplement to the required gas flow monitoring.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            4163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    33977
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3516
<INVENTORY>                                      24756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 61353
<PP&E>                                           62840
<DEPRECIATION>                                   21121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  225019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            42668
<BONDS>                                         120075
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                       55984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    225019
<SALES>                                          52408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 52408
<CGS>                                            36455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    36455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2144
<INCOME-TAX>                                       898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   1737
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.3

                             WEBLINK WIRELESS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                           TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
                                                     ------------------------------------------------
                                                      NUMBER                PERCENT        EQUIVALENT
                                                     OF SHARES            OUTSTANDING        SHARES
                                                     ----------           -----------      ----------

<S>                                                  <C>                  <C>              <C>
COMMON STOCK
   From Founders' Stock                               2,300,000             100.00%         2,300,000
   Stock Options Exercised                            2,508,997             100.00%         2,508,997
   Preferred Stock Converted to Common Stock         15,310,943             100.00%        15,310,943
   1994 Common Stock Offerings                       11,242,857             100.00%        11,242,857
   1995 Common Stock Offerings                        4,323,874             100.00%         4,323,874
   1996 Common Stock Offering                         6,000,000             100.00%         6,000,000
   1999 Treasury Stock Transaction                       (6,588)            100.00%            (6,588)
   March 2000 Debt Swap                               3,789,715             100.00%         3,789,715
   Canadian Transaction                                 714,286             100.00%           714,286
   Cancelation/Surrender of Stock                      (291,723)              4.36%           (12,714)
   Employee Stock Purchase Plan Shares Issued           190,651             100.00%           190,651
   Warrants Exercised                                   134,737             100.00%           134,737
                                                     ----------                         -------------
                                                     46,217,749                            46,496,758

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                        46,496,758

NET LOSS                                                                                ($107,903,155)

NET LOSS PER SHARE                                                                             ($2.32)
                                                                                        =============
</Table>
§ 884.2640 Fetal phonocardiographic monitor and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* A fetal phonocardiographic monitor is a device designed to detect, measure, and record fetal heart sounds electronically, in graphic form, and noninvasively, to ascertain fetal condition during labor. This generic type of device includes the following accessories: signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, and other component parts.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., CommercialMortgage  Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-NXS1

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of April 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

  

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
J'10 srqT

~

s 

W 

y e 

o` 

4~114 PROZW 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

~ AIR AND RADIATION 

b 

David Moody, Ph.D. 

Manager, Carlsbad Field Office NQy 3 0 2009 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Dr. Moody: 

On May 6, 2009, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested that the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve a proposed Tier 1(T1) change to characterize 

certain retrievably stored, remote-handled (RH) transuranic (TRU) debris (S5000) waste (referred 

to as SETF waste) for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). During November 

1978 — November 1991, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) generated and packaged a 

debris waste at their Solvent Extraction Test Facility (SETF). This letter approves the proposed 

T1 change based on the results of our T1 evaluation discussed in the enclosed report (EPA 

Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-120) and placed in the Agency's public docket. ORNL may dispose 

of the SETF waste at the WIPP. 

The Central Characterization Project (CCP) characterized the SETF debris waste using 

the system of controls that the EPA approved in February 2009 (see EPA Docket No. A-98-49, 

II-A4-111). EPA conducted the evaluation of the T 1 change July 7-8, 2009, and identified two 

concerns which the CCP satisfactorily resolved. EPA determined that the procedure and 

processes used by ORNL-CCP for the SETF RH TRU wastes were adequate. EPA, therefore, 

approves this T1 change to add SETF waste generated and packaged from November 1978 

through November 1991 to ORNL's baseline approval. 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 

343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. 

ector 

sion 

Enclosure 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable ® Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Christine Gelles, DOE EM 

Alton Harris, DOE EM 

Vernon Daub, CBFO 

J R Stroble, CBFO 

Ava Holland, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO 

Bill McMillan, ORNL 

D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP 

Allison Pangle, CTAC 

W.ayne Ledford, CTAC 

Steve Zappe, NMED 

Lloyd Generette, EPA Region 4
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8057 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in Westminster, California, 

as the ‘‘Little Saigon Vietnam War Veterans Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 8057 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LITTLE SAIGON VIETNAM WAR VETERANS ME2 MORIAL POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 9317 Bolsa Avenue in West5 minster, California, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Little Saigon Vietnam War Veterans Memorial Post Of7 fice’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Little Saigon Vietnam 

12 War Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
# C_2016232EN.01001201.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2016 — Red Lemon v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (ABTRONIC)

(Case T-643/14) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark ABTRONIC - Earlier EU word mark TRONIC - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Minimal inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark - Likelihood of confusion))

(2016/C 232/14)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Red Lemon Inc. (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: T. Wieland and S. Müller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2014 (Case R 1899/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG and Red Lemon Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Red Lemon Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Red Lemon Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 380, 27.10.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.5200 Carbonic anhydrase B and C immunological test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A carbonic anhydrase B and C immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques specific carbonic anhydrase protein molecules in serum and other body fluids. Measurements of carbonic anhydrase B and C aid in the diagnosis of abnormal hemoglobin metabolism.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 65 FR 2312, Jan. 14, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 9424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4223]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3308-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


Oklahoma; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-3308-EM), dated January, 30, 2010, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: January, 30, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective January, 30, 2010.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-4223 Filed 3-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.7140 Activated whole blood clotting time tests. ( a ) *Identification.* An activated whole blood clotting time tests is a device, used to monitor heparin therapy for the treatment of venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism by measuring the coagulation time of whole blood.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
[45 FR 60611, Sept. 12, 1980]