alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.2










Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2015
to December 31, 2015









COMM 2015-CCRE25







In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation
AB and with the requirements detailed in §10.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement(the
“Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool,(the “CMBS Pool”),
CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this Officer’s Certificate
with respect to the following:



| | (A) | a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the
“Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision
and;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us.



Sincerely,
CWCapital Asset Management LLC



David B. Iannarone

President





































7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda,
MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK CLIFORD MORETTI MOROTE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73593

Agency No. A073-753-835

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 28, 2014

Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Frank Cliford Moretti Morote (“Moretti Morote”) seeks review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his request for deferral of

removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Moretti Morote also

contends the BIA failed to address his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We

deny his petition for review.

FILED

SEP 04 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Moretti Morote did

not bear his burden of establishing eligibility for CAT protection. Although some

small factions of the Sendero Luminoso continue to exist in Peru (now largely as

narcotics traffickers in remote areas), the evidence does not compel the conclusion

that, after nearly twenty years, Moretti Morote would more likely than not be tortured

on account of his family’s past associations with that group. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c).1

Moretti Morote also attempts to bring a claim for ineffective assistance of

counsel because his criminal attorney failed to advise him of the immigration

consequences of his guilty plea. However, his isolated, passing reference in a

supplement to his BIA brief was insufficient to put the agency on notice that this was

an issue in the case, and therefore he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. 

See Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930 (9th Cir. 2004). As such, we dismiss this

claim for lack of jurisdiction. Sola v. Holder, 720 F.3d 1134, 1136 (9th Cir. 2013)

(per curiam).

 PETITION DENIED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART.

1

 We grant the government’s Motion to Strike and deny Moretti Morote’s

Motion to Remand to the BIA to consider new country conditions reports and other

evidence not previously presented to the BIA; however, this denial is without

prejudice to Moretti Morote’s ability to ask the BIA to consider such evidence in a

motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c); Go v. Holder, 744 F.3d 604, 609 (9th Cir.

2014).

2
Searched for **http://dra.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://dra.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
§ 1.1311(a)-2 Purpose and scope of section 1311. ( a ) Section 1311 provides for the correction of the effect of certain errors under circumstances specified in section 1312 when one or more provisions of law, such as the statute of limitations, would otherwise prevent such correction. Section 1311 may be applied to correct the effect of certain errors if, on the date of a determination (as defined in section 1313(a) and the regulations thereunder), correction is prevented by the operation of any provision of law other than sections 1311 through 1315 and section 7122 (relating to compromises) and the corresponding provisions of prior revenue laws. Examples of provisions preventing such corrections are sections 6501, 6511, 6532, and 6901 (c), (d) and (e), relating to periods of limitations; section 6212(c) and 6512 relating to the effect of petition to the Tax Court of the United States on further deficiency letters and on credits or refunds; section 7121 relating to closing agreements; and sections 6401 and 6514 relating to payments, refunds, or credits after the period of limitations has expired. Section 1311 may also be applied to correct the effect of an error if, on the date of the determination, correction of the error is prevented by the operation of any rule of law, such as *res judicata* or *estoppel.*
( b ) The determination (including a determination under section 1313 (a)(4)) may be with respect to any of the taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, by chapter 1 and subchapters A, B, D, and E of chapter 2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, or by the corresponding provisions of any prior revenue act, or by more than one of such provisions. Section 1311 may be applied to correct the effect of the error only as to the tax or taxes with respect to which the error was made which correspond to the tax or taxes with respect to which the determination relates. Thus, if the determination relates to a tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, the adjustment may be only with respect to the tax imposed by such chapter or by the corresponding provisions of prior law.
( c ) Section 1311 is not applicable if, on the date of the determination, correction of the effect of the error is permissible without recourse to said section.
( d ) If the tax liability for the year with respect to which the error was made has been compromised under section 7122 or the corresponding provisions of prior revenue laws, no adjustment may be made under section 1311 with respect to said year.
( e ) No adjustment may be made under section 1311 for any taxable year beginning prior to January 1, 1932. See section 1314(d).
( f ) Section 1311 applies only to a determination (as defined in section 1313(a) and §§ 1.1313(a)-1 to 1.1313 (a)-4, inclusive) made after November 14, 1954. Section 3801 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939 and the regulations thereunder apply to determinations, as defined therein, made on or before November 14, 1954. See section 1315.
[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 12031, Nov. 26, 1960]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5090]



[[Page 10795]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

Time And Date: 2 p.m., Wednesday, March 24, 2010.

Place: The United States Department of Labor Auditorium, Frances 
Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: The Commission will hear oral argument in the 
matter Secretary of Labor v. Eastern Associated Coal Corporation, 
Docket No. WEVA 2007-335. (Issues include whether certain violations of 
roof control requirements constituted an ``unwarrantable failure to 
comply.'')
    Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

Contact Person for More Information: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-5090 Filed 3-5-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8041 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to extend the duration of 

the exemption from pre-trip vehicle skills testing for school bus drivers, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2024 

Mr. CARTER of Texas (for himself, Ms. FOXX, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, and Mr. CUELLAR) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to extend the 

duration of the exemption from pre-trip vehicle skills 

testing for school bus drivers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Driving Forward Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8041 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXEMPTION FROM PRE-TRIP VEHI2 CLE SKILLS TESTING FOR SCHOOL BUS DRIV3 ERS. 

4 (a) EXTENDED EXEMPTION PERIOD.—The Secretary 

5 of Transportation shall issue such regulations as are nec6 essary to extend the exemption from the pre-trip vehicle 

7 skills testing component for Commercial Drivers License 

8 test candidates for the intra-state operation of school 

9 buses of the Department of Transportation titled ‘‘Com10 mercial Driver’s License: Application for Exemption; Na11 tional School Transportation Association’’, issued on Octo12 ber 27, 2022 (87 Fed. Reg. 65114), until November 27, 

13 2027. 

14 (b) PUBLIC COMMENTS ON FURTHER EXTENSION OF

15 EXEMPTION.—Not later than 120 days after the date of 

16 enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall solicit public 

17 comments on the feasibility and potential benefits of 

18 granting an exemption of unlimited duration. 

19 (c) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING.—Notwithstanding 

20 any other provision of law, funds made available to a State 

21 under section 31313 of title 49, United States Code, may 

22 be used by the State to assist with costs associated with 

23 implementing the exemption under subsection (a). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.1980 Radiologic table. ( a ) *Identification.* A radiologic table is a device intended for medical purposes to support a patient during radiologic procedures. The table may be fixed or tilting and may be electrically powered.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 892.9.
[53 FR 1567, Jan. 20, 1988, as amended at 63 FR 59231, Nov. 3, 1998]
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-30262 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. LAWRENCE J. CRANDLE, JR., Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:10-CR-35-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Lawrence J. Crandle, Jr., has moved for leave to with dr a w a n d has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Crandle has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Crandle’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “‘cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Sep tem ber 2 8, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-30262 Document: 00511616288 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2011No. 11-30262

to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.’” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2 0 0 6) (quoting United States v. Pierce , 959 F.2d 1297, 1301 (5th Cir. 1992)). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Crandle’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the app e a l p resents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities here i n , a n d the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-30262 Document: 00511616288 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2011
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03484**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03484\03484_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03484\03484_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03484\03484_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03484\03484_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03484\03484_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03484\03484_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03484\Certification Statement Plant ID 03484.pdf Plant certification statement x 03484\Supplemental Documentation\Freestone Facility Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03484\Supplemental Documentation\Freestone water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03484\Supplemental Documentation\03484_CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
### Gold quartz veins of the Alleghany district, California

By: H. G. FergusonR. W. Gannett

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp172

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 52**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The
 accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31,
 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | The
 information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.                              

|                     |                         
|-------------------- | ------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2009 | /s/ Rodney
 A. Young    
|                     | President
 and          
|                     | Chief
 Executive Officer
|                     |                         
|Date: March 17, 2009 | /s/ William
 J. Kullback
|                     | Chief
 Financial Officer

23

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 136658 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



### v SC: 136658 COA: 281834 Washtenaw CC: 06-000061-FC GARLAND LANE HALL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 17, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7796 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to authorize 

the use of Student Support and Academic Enrichment Grants for the 

development and maintenance of school and community gardens, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2024 

Ms. BROWN (for herself, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. CAREY, and Mr. JACKSON of 

Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to authorize the use of Student Support and 

Academic Enrichment Grants for the development and 

maintenance of school and community gardens, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thriving Community 

5 Gardens Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7796 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT SAFE AND HEALTHY STU2 DENTS. 

3 Clause (ii) of section 4108(5)(C) of the Elementary 

4 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

5 7118(5)(C)) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(ii) support a healthy, active life7 style, including— 

8 ‘‘(I) nutritional education and 

9 regular, structured physical education 

10 activities and programs, that may ad11 dress chronic disease management 

12 with instruction led by school nurses, 

13 nurse practitioners, or other appro14 priate specialists or professionals to 

15 help maintain the well-being of stu16 dents; and 

17 ‘‘(II) the development and main18 tenance of school or community gar19 dens;’’. 

20 SEC. 3. INFORMATION COLLECTION AND BEST PRACTICES. 

21 (a) INFORMATION COLLECTION.—The Secretary of 

22 Education shall regularly collect information from local 

23 educational agencies that use funds provided under section 

24 4108 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

25 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7118) to develop and maintain commuVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:27 Apr 09, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7796.IH H7796

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7796 IH

1 nity gardens (as authorized under paragraph (5)(C)(ii)(II) 

2 of such section). 

3 (b) IDENTIFICATION OF BEST PRACTICES.—Based 

4 on the information collected from local educational agen5 cies under subsection (a), the Secretary of Education shall 

6 identify best practices for the development and mainte7 nance of community gardens as described in such sub8 section. 

9 (c) PUBLICATION AND UPDATES.—The Secretary of 

10 Education shall— 

11 (1) publish the best practices identified under 

12 subsection (b) on a publicly accessible website of the 

13 Department of Education; and 

14 (2) regularly update the best practices based on 

15 information received from local educational agencies 

16 under subsection (a). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 18

- 00053

- CV

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellant s

v.

Michael D ’ s Restaurant San Antonio, Inc., A p pellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 17

- 005915, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties ha ve filed an agreed moti on to dismiss this appeal. The parti es inform

us th at a ppellee has nonsuited its claims in the trial court . The parties move for dismissal of the

appeal with prejud ice to its re filing by any part y. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a) (2) (A )

.

___________________________ _______________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justi ce

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: October 2, 2020
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1330 Depth electrode. ( a ) *Identification.* A depth electrode is an electrode used for temporary stimulation of, or recording electrical signals at, subsurface levels of the brain.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).