Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 11461 

Express Mail Contract 8 (MC2010- 

–16 and CP2010–16) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2009–6 and CP2009– 

7) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2 (MC2009–12 and 

CP2009–14) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 3 (MC2009–13 and 

CP2009–17) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 4 (MC2009–17 and 

CP2009–24) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 5 (MC2009–18 and 

CP2009–25) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 6 (MC2009–31 and 

CP2009–42) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 7 (MC2009–32 and 

CP2009–43) 

Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 8 (MC2009–33 and 

CP2009–44) 

Parcel Select & Parcel Return Service Contract 1 (MC2009–11 and 

CP2009–13) 

Parcel Select & Parcel Return Service Contract 2 (MC2009–40 and 

CP2009–61) 

Parcel Return Service Contract 1 

(MC2009–1 and CP2009–2) 

Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2008– 

8 and CP2008–26) 

Priority Mail Contract 2 (MC2009– 

2 and CP2009–3) 

Priority Mail Contract 3 (MC2009– 

4 and CP2009–5) 

Priority Mail Contract 4 (MC2009– 

5 and CP2009–6) 

Priority Mail Contract 5 (MC2009– 

21 and CP2009–26) 

Priority Mail Contract 6 (MC2009– 

25 and CP2009–30) 

Priority Mail Contract 7 (MC2009– 

25 and CP2009–31) 

Priority Mail Contract 8 (MC2009– 

25 and CP2009–32) 

Priority Mail Contract 9 (MC2009– 

25 and CP2009–33) 

Priority Mail Contract 10 

(MC2009–25 and CP2009–34) 

Priority Mail Contract 11 

(MC2009–27 and CP2009–37) 

Priority Mail Contract 12 

(MC2009–28 and CP2009–38) 

Priority Mail Contract 13 

(MC2009–29 and CP2009–39) 

Priority Mail Contract 14 

(MC2009–30 and CP2009–40) 

Priority Mail Contract 15 

(MC2009–35 and CP2009–54) 

Priority Mail Contract 16 

(MC2009–36 and CP2009–55) 

Priority Mail Contract 17 

(MC2009–37 and CP2009–56) 

Priority Mail Contract 18 

(MC2009–42 and CP2009–63) 

Priority Mail Contract 19 

(MC2010–1 and CP2010–1) 

Priority Mail Contract 20 

(MC2010–2 and CP2010–2) 

Priority Mail Contract 21 

(MC2010–3 and CP2010–3) 

Priority Mail Contract 22 

(MC2010–4 and CP2010–4) 

Priority Mail Contract 23 

(MC2010–9 and CP2010–9) 

Priority Mail Contract 24 

(MC2010–15 and CP2010–15) 

Outbound International 

Direct Entry Parcels Contracts 

Direct Entry Parcels 1 

(MC2009–26 and CP2009– 

36) 

Global Direct Contracts (MC2009– 

9, CP2009–10, and CP2009–11) 

Global Direct Contracts 1 

(MC2010–17 and CP2010–18) 

Global Expedited Package Services 

(GEPS) Contracts 

GEPS 1 (CP2008–5, CP2008– 

11, CP2008–12, CP2008–13, 

CP2008–18, CP2008–19, 

CP2008–20, CP2008–21, 

CP2008–22, CP2008–23, and 

CP2008–24) 

Global Expedited Package 

Services 2 (CP2009–50) 

Global Plus Contracts 

Global Plus 1 (CP2008–8, 

CP2008–46 and CP2009–47) 

Global Plus 2 (MC2008–7, 

CP2008–48 and CP2008–49) 

Inbound International 

Inbound Direct Entry Contracts 

with Foreign Postal Administrations 

Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign Postal 

Administrations (MC2008–6, 

CP2008–14 and MC2008–15) 

Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign Postal 

Administrations 1 (MC2008– 

6 and CP2009–62) 

International Business Reply Service Competitive Contract 1 

(MC2009–14 and CP2009–20) 

Competitive Product Descriptions 

Express Mail 

Express Mail 

Outbound International Expedited 

Services 

Inbound International Expedited 

Services 

Priority 

Priority Mail 

Outbound Priority Mail International 

Inbound Air Parcel Post 

Parcel Select 

Parcel Return Service 

International 

International Priority Airlift (IPA) 

International Surface Airlift (ISAL) 

International Direct Sacks—M– 

Bags 

Global Customized Shipping Services 

International Money Transfer Service 

Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at 

non-UPU rates) 

International Ancillary Services 

International Certificate of Mailing 

International Registered Mail 

International Return Receipt 

International Restricted Delivery 

International Insurance 

Negotiated Service Agreements 

Domestic 

Outbound International 

Part C—Glossary of Terms and Conditions 

[Reserved] 

Part D—Country Price Lists for International Mail [Reserved] 

[FR Doc. 2010–5212 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2009–0369; FRL–9125–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Minnesota 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a sitespecific revision to the Minnesota State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for 

particulate matter less than 10 microns 

(PM10) for Aggregate Industries Yard A 

Facility in Saint Paul, Ramsey County, 

Minnesota. On May 19, 2009, the 

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

(MPCA) requested that EPA approve 

certain portions of a joint Title I/Title V 

document into the Minnesota PM10 SIP 

for this facility. The State is also 

requesting in this submittal that EPA 

rescind the Administrative Order (AO) 

issued to J.L. Shiely Company which is 

currently included in Minnesota’s SIP 

for PM10. The emissions units 

previously owned by J.L. Shiely 

Company are now owned by Aggregate 

Industries. Because the PM10 emission 

limits are being reduced, the air quality 

of Ramsey County will be protected. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective May 10, 2010, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by April 12, 

2010. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2009–0369, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: damico.genevieve@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 385–5501. 

4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Acting 

Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
11462 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico, 

Acting Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, 

Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2009– 

0369. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This Facility is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding Federal 

holidays. We recommend that you 

telephone Gilberto Alvarez, 

Environmental Scientist, at (312) 886– 

6143 before visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental 

Scientist, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6143, 

alvarez.gilberto@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. General Information 

1. What Is the Background for This Action? 

2. Why Is EPA Taking This Action? 

3. What Are Title I Conditions and Joint 

Title I/Title V Documents? 

4. Has Public Notice Been Provided? 

II. What Action Is EPA Taking? 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. General Information 

1. What Is the Background for This 

Action? 

The Aggregate Industries Yard A 

Facility (facility) is located at 1177 

Childs Road in Saint Paul, Ramsey 

County, Minnesota. The facility was 

previously owned and operated by J.L. 

Shiely Company and was found to be a 

culpable source in the Childs Road 

area’s nonattainment of the PM10

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The facility is currently 

owned and operated by Aggregate 

Industries. 

Minnesota originally submitted an AO 

for the facility as part of the PM10 SIP 

in 1992. The AO was issued to the J.L. 

Shiely Company to place operating 

restrictions on the facility to control 

PM10 emissions. 

On April 23, 2009, the MPCA issued 

Air Permit no. 12300007–002 as a joint 

Title I/Title V document. The joint Title 

I/Title V document contains conditions 

identified as ‘‘Title I Conditions: SIP for 

PM10.’’ These conditions contain all the 

applicable requirements for the source 

to ensure that the area will continue to 

maintain the NAAQS. MPCA requests 

that those conditions labeled ‘‘Title I 

Conditions: SIP for PM10’’ in the Joint 

Title I/Title V document replace the AO 

as the SIP enforceable document. 

2. Why Is EPA Taking This Action? 

The SIP is being amended to reflect a 

change in ownership of the facility and 

the emissions units that are subject to 

SIP conditions. The facility is an 

aggregate distribution and storage 

facility. It receives aggregate by barge, 

uploads it, and conveys it to one of 

several storage piles based on size and 

material type. The aggregate is stored 

until it is loaded to trucks for off-site 

transport. The facility operates an 

aggregate heater that is used between 

November and April to reduce moisture 

content and make some materials more 

easily conveyed. The primary emissions 

from the facility are PM and PM10 from 

the aggregate heater, as well as fugitive 

emissions from the stockpiles and 

unpaved roads. According to previous 

emissions calculations for this facility, 

the majority of PM10 emissions were 

attributed to operation of the aggregate 

heater. 

Aggregate Industries currently owns 

the emissions units that are subject to 

PM10 emission limits or operating 

standards under the AO issued to J.L. 

Shiely Company. The AO was modified 

to show that the original aggregate 

heater, which burned fuel oil, has been 

replaced with a new heater, which 

burns natural gas. The previous 

emissions limits were up to 15.2 

pounds/hour (lbs/hr) PM10. However, 

with the replacement to the cleaner 

burning unit, those emissions are 

reduced by an order of magnitude to 

0.119 lbs/hr, significantly lowering 

overall PM10 emissions at this facility. 

Additional revisions to the SIP for units 

owned by Aggregate Industries include 

changes to requirements for storage 

piles to reflect actual operating 

conditions. Previously, the facility was 

not allowed to operate the product pile 

conveyors unless the free fall height 

from the conveyor to the product pile is 

less than 10 feet, to minimize fugitive 

dust, which represents a small portion 

of the overall PM10 emissions for this 

facility. However, there are times when 

operating conditions do not allow the 

facility to consistently maintain the 10 

foot free fall height, due to depletion of 

the product piles during winter months 

when supplies are limited by cold 

weather. Additional language ensures 

that the 10 foot fall height should be 

achieved as expeditiously as possible, 

and that the fall height cannot be greater 

than 10 feet for more than six hours. 

These requirements will ensure that the 

PM10 NAAQS is maintained, while 

allowing the facility some flexibility in 

establishing new product piles. 

Modeling performed in support of the 

original SIP for the facility attributed the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 11463 

majority of PM10 emissions to the 

burning of residual fuel oil in the 

original heater. Since this type of fuel 

will no longer be burned, overall 

ambient concentrations of PM10 will 

decrease, especially considering that the 

fugitive emissions from the conveyor 

operations contributed a much smaller 

proportion of PM10 emissions. 

3. What Are Title I Conditions and Joint 

Title I/Title V Documents? 

SIP control measures were contained 

in permits issued to culpable sources in 

Minnesota until 1990 when EPA 

determined that limits in state-issued 

permits are not Federally-enforceable 

because the permits expire. MPCA then 

issued permanent AOs to culpable 

sources in nonattainment areas from 

1991 to February of 1996. 

MPCA’s consolidated permitting 

regulations, which EPA approved into 

the SIP on May 2, 1995 (60 FR 21447), 

include the term ‘‘Title I condition’’ 

which was written, in part, to satisfy 

EPA’s requirements that SIP control 

measures remain permanent. A ‘‘Title I 

condition’’ is defined as ‘‘any condition 

based on source-specific determination 

of ambient impacts imposed for the 

purposes of achieving or maintaining 

attainment with the national ambient air 

quality standard and which was part of 

the state implementation plan approved 

by EPA or submitted to the EPA 

pending approval under section 110 of 

the act * * *’’ The rule also states that 

‘‘Title I conditions and the permittee’s 

obligation to comply with them, shall 

not expire, regardless of the expiration 

of the other conditions of the permit.’’ 

Further, ‘‘any Title I condition shall 

remain in effect without regard to 

permit expiration or reissuance, and 

shall be restated in the reissued permit.’’ 

MPCA has initiated using joint Title 

I/Title V documents as the enforceable 

document for imposing emission 

limitations and compliance 

requirements in SIPs. The SIP 

requirements in joint Title I/Title V 

documents submitted by MPCA are 

cited as ‘‘Title I conditions,’’ therefore 

ensuring that SIP requirements remain 

permanent and enforceable. EPA 

reviewed the State’s procedure for using 

joint Title I/Title V documents to 

implement site-specific SIP 

requirements and found it to be 

acceptable under both Titles I and V of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA) (July 3, 1997 

letter from David Kee, EPA, to Michael 

J. Sandusky, MPCA). Further, a June 15, 

2006, letter from EPA to MPCA clarifies 

procedures to transfer requirements 

from AOs to joint Title I/Title V 

documents. 

4. Has Public Notice Been Provided? 

MPCA published a public notice on 

March 12, 2009, regarding the SIP 

revision and the Joint Title I/Title V 

document. No comments were received 

during the comment period which 

ended on April 20, 2009. In the public 

notice, MPCA stated it would hold a 

public hearing if one were requested 

during the comment period. This 

follows the alternative public 

participation process EPA approved on 

June 5, 2006 (71 FR 32274). For limited 

types of SIP revisions that the public 

has shown little interest in, a public 

hearing is not automatically required. If 

anyone requests a public hearing during 

the comment period, MPCA will hold a 

public hearing. Because no one 

requested a public hearing, MPCA did 

not hold a public hearing for these SIP 

revisions. 

II. What Action Is EPA Taking? 

EPA is approving a site-specific 

revision to the Minnesota PM10 SIP for 

the Aggregate Industries Yard A 

Facility, located in the city of Saint 

Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The 

SIP revision also rescinds the AO issued 

to J.L. Shiely Company and replaces it 

with Title I SIP Conditions included in 

the Air Emission Permit No. 12300007– 

002, for Aggregate Industries, which 

serves as a joint Title I/Title V 

document. 

We are publishing this action without 

prior proposal because we view this as 

a noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

state plan if relevant adverse written 

comments are filed. This rule will be 

effective May 10, 2010 without further 

notice unless we receive relevant 

adverse written comments by April 12, 

2010. If we receive such comments, we 

will withdraw this action before the 

effective date by publishing a 

subsequent document that will 

withdraw the final action. All public 

comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

If we do not receive any comments, this 

action will be effective May 10, 2010. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews. 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 

5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
11464 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 47 / Thursday, March 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by May 10, 2010. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides. 

Dated: February 25, 2010. 

Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

■ 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart Y—Minnesota 

■ 2. In § 52.1220 the table in paragraph 

(d) is amended by removing the entry 

for ‘‘J.L. Shiely Company’’ and adding an 

entry, in alphabetical order, for 

‘‘Aggregate Industries’’ to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MINNESOTA SOURCE-SPECIFIC PERMITS

Name of source Permit No. 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA 

approval 

date 

Comments 

Aggregate Industries ....................... 12300007–002 04/03/09 03/11/10, [Insert page number 

where the document begins].

Only conditions cited as ‘‘Title I 

condition: SIP for PM10 NAAQS.’’ 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2010–5122 Filed 3–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2008–0192; FRL–9125–9] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Texas; 

Revisions to Chapter 116 Which Relate 

to the Permit Renewal Application and 

Permit Renewal Submittal 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking a direct final 

action to approve revisions to the 

applicable State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) for the State of Texas which relate 

to the Permit Renewal Application and 

Permit Renewal Submittal regulations. 

These portions of the SIP revisions 

approved today would address 

requirements related to the timeline for 

the submittal of an application for 

permit renewal. EPA finds that these 

changes to the Texas SIP comply with 

the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or 

CAA) and EPA regulations, are 

consistent with EPA policies, and will 

improve air quality. This action is being 

proposed under section 110 and parts C 

and D of the Act. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

on May 10, 2010 without further notice, 

unless EPA receives relevant adverse 

comment by April 12, 2010. If EPA 

receives such comment, EPA will 

publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that this rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06– 

OAR–2008–0192 by one of the following 

methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

(2) E-mail: Mr. Jeff Robinson at 

robinson.jeffrey@epa.gov. Please also cc 

the person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below. 

(3) U.S. EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’ 

Web site: http://epa.gov/region6/ 

r6coment.htm. Please click on ‘‘6PD’’ 

(Multimedia) and select ‘‘Air’’ before 

submitting comments. 

(4) Fax: Mr. Jeff Robinson, Chief, Air 

Permits Section (6PD–R), at fax number 

214–665–6762. 

(5) Mail: Mr. Jeff Robinson, Chief, Air 

Permits Section (6PD–R), Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

(6) Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Jeff 

Robinson, Chief, Air Permits Section 

(6PD–R), Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, 

Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Such 

deliveries are accepted only between the 

hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. 

weekdays except for legal holidays. 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2008– 

0192. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means that EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an e-mail 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through http://www.regulations.gov 

your e-mail address will be 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES