alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.1055-1 General rule with respect to redeemable ground rents. ( a ) *Character of a redeemable ground rent.* For purposes of subtitle A of the Code ( 1 ) a redeemable ground rent (as defined in section 1055(c) and paragraph (b) of this section) shall be treated as being in the nature of a mortgage, and
( 2 ) real property held subject to liabilities under such a redeemable ground rent shall be treated as held subject to liabilities under a mortgage. Thus, under section 1055(a) and this paragraph, the transfer of property subject to a redeemable ground rent has the same effect as the transfer of property subject to a mortgage, the acquisition of property subject to a redeemable ground rent is to be treated the same as the acquisition of property subject to a mortgage, and the holding of property subject to a redeemable ground rent is to be treated in the same manner as the holding of property subject to a mortgage. See section 163(c) for the treatment of any annual or periodic rental payment under a redeemable ground rent as interest.
( b ) *Definition of redeemable ground rent.* For purposes of subtitle A of the Code, the term *redeemable ground rent* means only a ground rent with respect to which all the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) There is a lease of land which is assignable by the lessee without the consent of the lessor.
( 2 ) The term of the lease is for a period in excess of 15 years, taking into account all periods for which the lease may be renewed at the option of the lessee.
( 3 ) The lessee has a present or future right to terminate the lease and to acquire the lessor's interest in the land (i.e., to redeem the ground rent) by the payment of a determined or determinable amount, which amount is referred to in §§ 1.1055-2, 1.1055-3, and 1.1055-4 as a *redemption price.* Such right must exist by virtue of State or local law. If the lessee's right to terminate the lease and to acquire the lessor's interest is not granted by State or local law but exists solely by virtue of a private agreement or privately created condition, the ground rent is not a *redeemable ground rent.*
( 4 ) The lessor's interest in the land subject to the lease is primarily a security interest to protect the payment to him of the annual or periodic rental payments due under the lease.
( c ) *Effective date.* In general, the provisions of section 1055 and paragraph (a) of this section take effect on April 11, 1963, and apply with respect to taxable years ending on or after such date. See § 1.1055-3 for rules for determining the basis of real property acquired subject to liabilities under a redeemable ground rent regardless of when such property was acquired. See also § 1.1055-4 for rules for determining the basis of a redeemable ground rent in the hands of a holder who reserved or created such ground rent in connection with a transfer, occurring before April 11, 1963, of the right to hold real property subject to liabilities under such ground rent.
[T.D. 6821, 30 FR 6216, May 4, 1965]
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.2030 Medical image digitizer. ( a ) *Identification.* A medical image digitizer is a device intended to convert an analog medical image into a digital format. Examples include Iystems employing video frame grabbers, and scanners which use lasers or charge-coupled devices.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls; voluntary standards—Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Std., Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Std.). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 892.9.
[63 FR 23387, Apr. 29, 1998, as amended at 84 FR 71819, Dec. 30, 2019]
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2012

- 0107 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2012

-NM

- 018

-AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet 

### Inspection (a/c w/o fuel bladders) 8.0 $ 680.00 $ 680.00 

### 10 $6,800.00 Inspection (a/c with fuel bladders) 80 .0 $6,800.0 0 $ 6,800.00 28 $190,400.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $197,200 

### Costs covere d under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Replacement 96 0.0 $81,600.00 $10,000 $91,600.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : All costs are

### estimated. Costing information is being obtained from an operator. Neptune is known to have removed the

fuel bladders and they have 10 aircraft (hence the two entries for the inspection). **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: if replacement is required, then costs could escalate significantly. However, not replacing damaged structure has dire consequences. **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
**Exhibit 35.9**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE 

I, Karen Montbach, aManaging Director of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”), hereby certify, with respect to the Trust and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2015 , (the “Agreement”), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.,as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as servicer and special servicer, Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the “Certificate Administrator”), and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,as trustee, the following: 

1.     A review of the Company’s activities as Certificate Administrator during thereporting period ending December 31, 2016 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the reporting period ending December 31, 2016,the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

This statement is given bythe undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigned’s individual capacity. 

Date:    February 27,2017
§ 1.1362-7 Effective dates. ( a ) *In general.* The provisions of §§ 1.1362-1 through 1.1362-6 apply to taxable years of corporations beginning after December 31, 1992. For taxable years to which these regulations do not apply, corporations and shareholders subject to the provisions of section 1362 must take reasonable return positions taking into consideration the statute; its legislative history; the provisions of §§ 18.1362-1 through 18.1362-5 (see 26 CFR part 18 as contained in the CFR edition revised as of April 1, 1992). In addition, following these regulations is a reasonable return position. See Notice 92-56, 1992-49 I.R.B. (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)( b ) of this chapter), for additional guidance regarding reasonable return positions for years to which §§ 1.362-1 through 1.1362-6 do not apply. Section 1.1362-6(b)(2)(iv) is applicable for taxable years beginning on and after May 14, 2002.
( b ) *Special effective date for passive investment income provisions.* For taxable years of an S corporation and all affected shareholders that are not closed, the S corporation and all affected shareholders may elect to apply the provisions of § 1.1362-2(c)(5). To make the election, the corporation and all affected shareholders must file a return or an amended return that is consistent with these rules for the taxable year for which the election is made and each subsequent taxable year. For purposes of this section, *affected shareholders* means all shareholders who received distributive shares of S corporation items in the taxable year for which the election is made and all shareholders of the S corporation for all subsequent taxable years. However, the Commissioner may, in appropriate circumstances, permit taxpayers to make this election even if all affected shareholders cannot file consistent returns.
[T.D. 8449, 57 FR 55456, Nov. 25, 1992, as amended by T.D. 8994, 67 FR 34401, May 14, 2002]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4957]



[[Page 11105]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
at the USDA Service Center in Redding, California, on March 31, 2010, 
from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss 
project updates and proposals, information on monitoring efforts, and a 
timeline for the upcoming year.

DATES: Wednesday, March 31 at 8:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the USDA Service Center, 3644 
Avtech Parkway, Redding, California 96002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Resource Advisory Committee 
Coordinator Ray Mooney at (530) 226-2494 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92f8fffdfdfcf7ebd2f4e1bcf4f7f6bce7e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="573d3a383839322e17312479313233792224">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
input sessions will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee.

    Dated: March 10, 2010.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2010-4957 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1.1081-5 Distribution solely of stock or securities. ( a ) *In general.* If, without any surrender of his stock or securities as defined in section 1083(f), a shareholder in a corporation which is a registered holding company or a majority-owned subsidiary company receives stock or securities in such corporation or owned by such corporation, no gain to the shareholder will be recognized with respect to the stock or securities received by such shareholder which do not constitute nonexempt property, if the distribution to such shareholder is made by the distributing corporation in obedience to an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission directed to such corporation. A distribution is not within the provisions of section 1081(c)(1) if it is within the provisions of section 1081(d), relating to transfers within a system group. A distribution is also not within the provisions of section 1081(c)(1) if it involves a surrender by the shareholder of stock or securities or a transfer by the shareholder of property in exchange for the stock or securities received by the shareholder. For further limitations, see section 1081(f).
( b ) *Special rule.* ( 1 ) If there is distributed to a shareholder in a corporation rights to acquire common stock in a second corporation, no gain to the shareholder from the receipt of the rights shall be recognized, but only if all the following requirements are met: ( i ) The rights are received by the shareholder without the surrender by the shareholder of any stock in the distributing corporation,
( ii ) Such distribution is in accordance with an arrangement forming a ground for an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued pursuant to section 3 of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (15 U. S. C. 79c) that the distributing corporation is exempt from any provision or provisions of such act, and
( iii ) Before January 1, 1958, the distributing corporation disposes of all the common stock in the second corporation which it owns.
( 2 ) The distributing corporation shall, as soon as practicable, notify the district director in whose district the corporation's income tax return and supporting data was filed (see paragraph (g) of § 1.1081-11), as to whether or not the requirement of subparagraph (1)(iii) of this paragraph has been met. If such requirement has not been met, the periods of limitation (sections 6501 and 6502) with respect to any deficiency, including interest and additions to the tax, resulting solely from the receipt of such rights to acquire stock, shall include one year immediately following the date of such notification; and assessment and collection shall be made notwithstanding any provisions of law or rule of law which would otherwise prevent such assessment and collection.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
# C_2014184EN.01004002.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/40

---

Action brought on 19 February 2014 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-15/14)

2014/C 184/66

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Parliament to terminate the applicant’s employment contract at the end of the extension to his probationary period.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the European Parliament dated 12 April 2013 to dismiss him with effect from 15 July 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Parliament dated 12 April 2013 to dismiss him with effect from 15 July 2013;

| — | Fix the compensation due to the applicant, should it be legally impossible for the European Parliament to reinstate him by appointing him as an established official, in the amount of EUR 45 000, together with default interest; |
| --- | --- |

—

Fix the compensation due to the applicant, should it be legally impossible for the European Parliament to reinstate him by appointing him as an established official, in the amount of EUR 45 000, together with default interest;

| — | Order the Parliament to pay the whole costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Parliament to pay the whole costs of the proceedings.

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7642 

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program 

Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719 et seq.). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Ms. SCHOLTEN (for herself and Mr. YAKYM) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and 

Design Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719 et seq.). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF JUNIOR DUCK STAMP 

4 CONSERVATION AND DESIGN PROGRAM ACT 

5 OF 1994. 

6 (a) DEFINITION OF STATE.—Section 5 of the Junior 

7 Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 

8 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719b–1) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘Guam,’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7642 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘, and any other territory or 

2 possession’’ after ‘‘Virgin Islands’’. 

3 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

4 6 of the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design 

5 Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719c) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘$350,000’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$550,000’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘2006 through 2010’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘2024 through 2030’’; and 

11 (2) in subsection (b)— 

12 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 

13 ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$200,000’’; and 

14 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking 

15 ‘‘$250,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$350,000’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 892
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 892 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 892.5700 Remote controlled radionuclide applicator system. ( a ) *Identification.* A remote controlled radionuclide applicator system is an electromechanical or pneumatic device intended to enable an operator to apply, by remote control, a radionuclide source into the body or to the surface of the body for radiation therapy. This generic type of device may include patient and equipment supports, component parts, treatment planning computer programs, and accessories.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.4885 External vein stripper. ( a ) *Identification.* An external vein stripper is an extravascular device used to remove a section of a vein.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
| · | The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| · | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/ David Co                                                    |
|   |                                 | Name:  David Co |
|   |                                 | Its:  Director |
|   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/ Matt Bowen                                               |
|   |                                 | Name:  Matt Bowen |
|   |                                 | Its:  Managing Director |
|   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/ Kevin Fischer                                             |
|   |                                 | Name:  Kevin Fischer |
|   |                                 | Its:  Director |

|   | DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/ David Co                                                    |
|   |                                 | Name:  David Co |
|   |                                 | Its:  Director |
|   |                                 |   |
|   | By:                                  | /s/ Jenna Kaufman                                          |
|   |                                 | Name:  Jenna Kaufman |
|   |                                 | Its:  Director |
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<Table>
<Caption>

LEGAL NAME                                    JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION
<S>                                           <C>
Transgenomic, Ltd.                                   United Kingdom
Transgenomic Japan, Inc.                                Delaware
Annovis, Inc.                                           Delaware
Cruachem, Ltd.                                          Scotland
</Table>