alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- Contact

### Alkalic rocks of Iron Hill, Gunnison County, Colorado

#### Professional Paper 197-A

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and					   
Notices

U.S. Department of the					   Interior |				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp197A 
                    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact				   Page				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 2012 
00:10:19
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification Pursuant To
Rules 13a-14(a) And 15d-14(a) Under The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934, As Amended
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation (the
Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: September 11, 2006
    
    /s/ Zafiris G. ZafirelisZafiris G. ZafirelisChairman of the Board,President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7897 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to finalize a proposed rule to remove 

the Apache trout from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened 

Wildlife. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2024 

Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to finalize a proposed 

rule to remove the Apache trout from the Federal List 

of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINALIZATION OF PROPOSED RULE TO RE4 MOVE APACHE TROUT FROM FEDERAL LIST 

5 OF ENDANGERED AND THREATENED WILD6 LIFE. 

7 Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact8 ment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior, acting 

9 through the Director of the United States Fish and WildVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:06 Apr 17, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7897.IH H7897

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7897 IH

1 life Service, shall finalize the proposed rule titled ‘‘Endan2 gered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the 

3 Apache Trout From the List of Endangered and Threat4 ened Wildlife’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 54548; published August 11, 

5 2023). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 26, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 26, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0260. SAKS MANAGEMENT AND ASSOCIATES, LLC v. SUNG GENERAL CONTRACTING, INC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17A05545
Subject: Conference call with GCC of America

Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC

Date: August 28, 2012

Participants:

GCC of America

Doug Roark

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Keith Barnett

Steffan Johnson

Sharon Nizich

Robin Segall

RTI International

Mike Laney

Mr. Roark of GCC described an alternative approach for determining compliance with the

proposed PM emission limits. This was the same approach as described in his comments

submitted on th e July 18, 2012 proposed revisions.
Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet 

Kentucky Division for Air Quality 

------------------------------------------- 

Appendix C 

Modeling Analysis Protocol 

and 

Quality Assurance Project Plan 

 

Appendix C - 1 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
[This page intentionally left blank.]

Appendix C - 2 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Introduction 

The regional haze modeling was coordinated by the Southeast Regional Planning Organization, 

Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS), which is 

comprised of the ten Southeast States (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North 

Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia) and the local programs and 

tribal agencies located within these states. VISTAS contracted with Environ International Corp, 

Alpine Geophysics, LLC and the University of California Riverside to perform the emissions and 

air quality modeling for this regional haze state and tribal implementation plans implementation 

plans. 

Attachment C.1 contains modeling protocol submitted by the contractors entitled Modeling 

Protocol for the VISTAS Phase II Regional Haze Modeling. The modeling protocol documents 

the meteorological model, emissions model and air quality model that will be used for this 

project. It discusses details about the configuration of the models, modeling domains, quality 

assurance objectives, etc. 

Attachment C.2 contains the quality assurance project plan that was developed by the modeling 

contractors to outline the quality assurance procedures to be used in the modeling process. 

Attachment C3 contains an article from Atmospheric Environment published in 2006. The article 

contains details of modifications made to the secondary organic aerosols (SOA) module in 

CMAQ, by ENVIRON, to better quantify SOA. This was necessary as preliminary modeling 

runs showed organic carbon was significantly under-predicted in the summer and this under 

prediction was determined to be unacceptable because organic carbon is a major contributor to 

PM mass and visibility impairment in the southeastern US. The modified SOA module in 

CMAQ incorporates additional SOA formation based on emissions data from pine forests in 

Durham, NC. Full details of the SOA module are included in section 4 of the article. 

Appendix C - 3 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
[This page intentionally left blank.]

Appendix C - 4 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1320 Cutaneous electrode. ( a ) *Identification.* A cutaneous electrode is an electrode that is applied directly to a patient's skin either to record physiological signals (e.g., the electroencephalogram) or to apply electrical stimulation.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CELERIS CORPORATION DATED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,138,542
<SECURITIES>                                 7,083,851
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,688,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                   172,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,151,465
<PP&E>                                       1,012,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,164,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,959,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,194
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,110,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,164,451
<SALES>                                      5,782,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,782,487
<CGS>                                        4,027,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,067,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,113,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,113,937)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (10,539,051)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (12,652,988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.32)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000815024
<NAME> AMERICAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,547,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,547,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,897
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (167,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (163,744)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2016232EN.01000901.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2016 — mobile.international v EUIPO — Rezon (mobile.de)

(Joined Cases T-322/14 and T-325/14) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word and figurative trade marks mobile.de - Earlier national figurative mark mobile - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 15(1), Article 57(2) and Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rule 40(6) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))

(2016/C 232/10)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: mobile.international GmbH (Kleinmachnow, Germany) (represented by: T. Lührig, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rezon OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: P. Kanchev and T. Ignatova, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Two actions brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January (Case R 922/2013-1) and 13 February 2014 (Case R 951/2013-1) relating to two cancellation proceedings between mobile.international GmbH and Rezon OOD.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders mobile.international GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders mobile.international GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.

1

---
Searched for **http://library.case.edu/ksl/census/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://library.case.edu/ksl/census/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1510 Eye movement monitor. ( a ) *Identification.* An eye movement monitor is an AC-powered device with an electrode intended to measure and record ocular movements.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
§ 884.6190 Assisted reproductive microscopes and microscope accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* Assisted reproduction microscopes and microscope accessories (excluding microscope stage warmers, which are classified under assisted reproduction accessories) are optical instruments used to enlarge images of gametes or embryos. Variations of microscopes and accessories used for these purposes would include phase contrast microscopes, dissecting microscopes and inverted stage microscopes.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 884.9.
[63 FR 48436, Sept. 10, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 62977, Nov. 18, 1999; 66 FR 38809, July 25, 2001]
Exhibit 10.4
 THE TIMBERLAND COMPANY
 2007 INCENTIVE PLAN
 NON-QUALIFIED  STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 
 th
 shares on or aftershares on or aftershares on or after
  THE TIMBERLAND COMPANYBy:ACKNOWLEDGED AND RECEIVED
 Date:
    
    
    
    
    
    Optionees Signature




---



##### 



NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
 Manner of Exercise; Payment provided however
 Adjustment of Option and Option Price
 Foreign Exchange/ Ownership Requirements and Risk
 Non-transferability of Options
 Other Termination of Employment




---



##### 



Provisions of the Plan
 Discretionary Awards
  Plan Administration
 Miscellaneous
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland LoanServices, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibilityis to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’scompliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
§ 1.1059(e)-1 Non-pro rata redemptions. ( a ) *In general.* Section 1059(d)(6) (exception where stock held during entire existence of corporation) and section 1059(e)(2) (qualifying dividends) do not apply to any distribution treated as an extraordinary dividend under section 1059(e)(1). For example, if a redemption of stock is not pro rata as to all shareholders, any amount treated as a dividend under section 301 is treated as an extraordinary dividend regardless of whether the dividend is a qualifying dividend.
( b ) *Reorganizations.* For purposes of section 1059(e)(1), any exchange under section 356 is treated as a redemption and, to the extent any amount is treated as a dividend under section 356(a)(2), it is treated as a dividend under section 301.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section applies to distributions announced (within the meaning of section 1059(d)(5)) on or after June 17, 1996.
[T.D. 8724, 62 FR 38028, July 16, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7843 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7843

   To direct the Secretary of Defense to enter into a Memorandum of 
 Understanding with the United States Environmental Protection Agency 
     and Guam Environmental Protection Agency to conduct necessary 
      environmental inspections at military instillations in Guam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2024

 Mr. Moylan (for himself, Mr. Gimenez, and Mr. Veasey) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Defense to enter into a Memorandum of 
 Understanding with the United States Environmental Protection Agency 
     and Guam Environmental Protection Agency to conduct necessary 
      environmental inspections at military instillations in Guam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Guam EPA Cooperation Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE 
              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.

    The Secretary of Defense may enter into a Memorandum of 
Understanding with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to provide 
technical assistance and carry out both federally and locally required 
environmental inspections for military construction projects in the 
territory of Guam. Such memorandum of understanding may include or be 
carried out in consultation with the Guam Environmental Protection 
Agency. The Department of Defense may compensate the U.S. EPA for 
activities carried out pursuant to such memorandum of understanding.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.3250 External facial fracture fixation appliance. ( a ) *Identification.* An external facial fracture fixation appliance is a metal apparatus intended to be used during surgical reconstruction and repair to immobilize maxillofacial bone fragments in their proper facial relationship.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 878.9.
[53 FR 23872, June 24, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 13827, Apr. 5, 1989; 65 FR 2317, Jan. 14, 2000]
Att. 003

Contains Confidential Business Information

Confidential Information Redacted