alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7892 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7892

 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to rename master promissory 
      notes for loans made under part D to student loan contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2024

  Ms. Underwood (for herself, Mr. Levin, Mr. Trone, Ms. Clarke of New 
  York, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, and Mr. Thanedar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to rename master promissory 
      notes for loans made under part D to student loan contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Contract Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. STUDENT LOAN CONTRACT AND LOAN DISCLOSURES.

    (a) Student Loan Contract.--Section 432(m)(1)(D) of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1082(m)(1)(D)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
                            ``(iv) Student loan contract.--
                                    ``(I) In general.--Any master 
                                promissory note form described in this 
                                subparagraph that is developed or used 
                                for loans made under part D for periods 
                                of enrollment beginning on or after the 
                                date of enactment of the Student Loan 
                                Contract Act of 2024 shall be referred 
                                to as a `student loan contract'.
                                    ``(II) Clarification on use.--A 
                                student loan contract for loans made 
                                under part D for a student shall only 
                                be used with respect to loans made 
                                under part D for the periods of 
                                enrollment that are in the same award 
                                year for which the initial loans for 
                                which the contract is used were 
                                made.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 485(l)(2)(B) of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1092(l)(2)(B)) is amended by inserting 
before the period at the end the following: ``or the student loan 
contract''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20948 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO MEDINA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-61-2

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Antonio Medina appeals from his conviction by guilty plea of illegal importation of Freon. Medina contends that the Government breached his plea agreement by failing to recommend sentencing at the low end of the guideline range. Medina did not raise his contention in the district court; his contention is reviewed for plain error. United States v. Cerverizzo , 74 F.3d 629, 631 (5th Cir. 1996). Whether Medina provided the cooperation necessary to obtain the Government’srecommendation is a factual issue that could have been resolved

by the district court upon proper objection; Medina therefore cannot demonstrate plain error. United States v. AlvaradoSaldivar , 62 F.3d 697, 700 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
§ 822.10 What must I include in my surveillance plan? Your surveillance plan must include a discussion of: ( a ) The plan objective(s) addressing the surveillance question(s) identified in our order;
( b ) The subject of the study, e.g., patients, the device, animals;
( c ) The variables and endpoints that will be used to answer the surveillance question, e.g., clinical parameters or outcomes;
( d ) The surveillance approach or methodology to be used;
( e ) Sample size and units of observation;
( f ) The investigator agreement, if applicable;
( g ) Sources of data, e.g., hospital records;
( h ) The data collection plan and forms;
( i ) The consent document, if applicable;
( j ) Institutional Review Board information, if applicable;
( k ) The patient followup plan, if applicable;
( l ) The procedures for monitoring conduct and progress of the surveillance;
( m ) An estimate of the duration of surveillance;
( n ) All data analyses and statistical tests planned;
( o ) The content and timing of reports.
§ 884.6200 Assisted reproduction laser system. ( a ) *Identification.* The assisted reproduction laser system is a device that images, targets, and controls the power and pulse duration of a laser beam used to ablate a small tangential hole in, or to thin, the zona pellucida of an embryo for assisted hatching or other assisted reproduction procedures.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Assisted Reproduction Laser Systems.” See § 884.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
[69 FR 77624, Dec. 28, 2004]
#### Leon Rutherford KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. O.L. McCOTTER, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-2006

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 30, 1986.

Ken J. McLean, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.

Paula C. Offenhauser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

Before RUBIN, JOHNSON, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petitioner, Leon Rutherford King, was convicted in a Texas state court of first degree murder and sentenced to death. After exhausting his state remedies, King filed a petition for federal habe-as relief. In a one-sentence order, the district court denied King’s petition. In a separate order, the court issued a certificate of probable cause to appeal. We remand the case to the district court with instructions that a statement of reasons be provided for the denial of each claim presented in King’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

“We have repeatedly instructed the district courts in this circuit to set forth, albeit briefly and perhaps orally, the specific reasons for the disposition of a capital case even if to do so would require temporarily staying the execution.” *Flowers v. Blackburn,*759 F.2d 1194, 1195 (5th Cir.1985). *See, e.g., Mattheson v. King,*751 F.2d *5181432, 1435 n. 5 (5th Cir.1985) (“in a capital case it is essential that a district court set forth those specific findings of fact and conclusions of law that underlie its ultimate disposition of the case”), *cert. dismissed,*— U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1798, 90 L.Ed.2d 343 (1986); *Willie v. Maggio,*737 F.2d 1372, 1377 (5th Cir.1984) (“More important, however, particularly in a capital ease, is the requirement that the district court set forth ... those specific findings of fact and conclusions of law that underlie its ultimate conclusion to grant any relief”). Further, Local Rule 21 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas provides that an opinion of that court in any action petitioning for a stay of execution of a state court judgment “shall separately state each issue raised by the petition and rule expressly on each issue stating the reasons for each ruling made.” In a case such as this, where an execution date has not been set and, thus, not even a temporary stay of execution is involved, we can perceive no justification, and the district court has stated none, for its failure to follow the mandates of its Local Rule. Both the petitioner and the public are entitled to know the reasons for the court’s action. Furthermore, such reasons are indispensable to effective appellate review. *Flowers,*759 F.2d at 1195.

Accordingly, this case is remanded to the district court with instructions that a statement of reasons be provided for the denial of each claim presented in King’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.5040 Albumin immunological test system. ( a ) *Identification.* An albumin immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the albumin (a plasma protein) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of albumin aids in the diagnosis of kidney and intestinal diseases.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 63 FR 59227, Nov. 3, 1998]
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as  Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, TRIMONT REAL ESTATE ADVISORS, INC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates  Series 2015-SG1(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.                                                                                                                         (logo) Together we’ll go far
FOR VALUE
      RECEIVED,
                
       hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto
                                                                            
                                                                 
                                         
         Units represented by the within Certificate,
      and do  hereby irrevocably  constitute and appoint 
                                                                               
       Attorney to transfer the said Units on the books of the within
      named Company with full power of substitution in the
      premises.



	
       



	
                 
      Dated
                                                      
      ,
                           
      .



	
       



	
      In Presence of



	
       



	                                                                                               	 


	 	                                                                                               


	 


	 


	 	                                                                                               


	
       



	 


	
       
	
      The transferability of the Units represented
      by this certificate is restricted. Such Units may not be sold, assigned,
      or transferred, nor will any assignee, vendee, transferee, or endorsee
      thereof be recognized as having acquired any such Units for any purposes,
      unless and to the extent such sale, transfer, hypothecation, or assignment
      is permitted by, and is completed in strict accordance with, applicable
      state and federal law and the terms and conditions set forth in the
      Operating Agreement and agreed to by each
Member.



	 <R>


	
       
	
      The Units represented by this
      certificate may not be sold, offered for sale, or transferred in the
      absence of an effective registration under theapplicable state securities laws, or an
      opinion of counsel satisfactory to the company that such transaction is
      exempt from registration under applicable state securities laws.



	
       </R>
Exhibit 35.6  LOGO ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF LNR PARTNERS, LLC The undersigned, Job Warshaw,
being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the Special Servicer), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:  1.
A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1,
2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the Reporting Period), and of the Special Servicers performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made
under my supervision; and  2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122
of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  LNR PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida
limited liability companyBy:

/s/ Job WarshawJob WarshawPresident
 Dated: February 19, 2019   1601 Washington Avenue  Suite 700
 Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164 Telephone: (305) 695-5600  Fax: (305) 695-5601




---

Schedule I COMM 2015-CR24 COMM 2015-CCRE24 Mortgage Trust Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (Eden Roc- CGCMT 2015-P1) Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation c/o
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP One World Financial Center New York NY 10281 Anna H Glick Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation 60 Wall
Street New York NY 10005 Lainie Kaye Park Bridge Lender Services LLC 600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor Att: {Pool Name} New York NY 10016 Group Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia MD 21045 Group Notices Wilmington Trust, National Association 1100 North Market Street Wilmington DE 19890 Adam Scozzafava Wilmington Trust, National Association 1100 North Market Street Wilmington DE 19890 Group Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 388 Greenwich Street, 11th Floor New York NY 10013
Exhibit 35.12



|     |  |  |                                           |                
|---- |  |  | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------
|LOGO |  |  |                                           | CMBS Department
|     |  |  | MAC N9401-011                            
|     |  |  | 1055 10th Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN
55414

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for GS MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORPORATION II Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC32
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2015 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Custodian (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 17, 2016



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|              
|GAIL VANNEST  
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# C_2016392EN.01002602.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Italy v Commission

(Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15) (1)

1

((Language regime - Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators - Choice of second language from three languages - Regulation No 1 - Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations - Principle of non-discrimination - Proportionality))

(2016/C 392/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Currall and G. Gattinara (Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15) and F. Simonetti (Case T-17/15), then G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: D. Kriaučiūnas and V. Čepaitė, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

In Case T-353/14, application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/276/14, to constitute a reserve list for administrators (OJ 2014 C 74 A, p. 4), and, in Case T-17/15, application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment of the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/294/14 to constitute a reserve list of administrators in the field of data protection for the European Data Protection Supervisor (OJ 2014 C 391 A, p. 1.)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Joins Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Joins Cases T-353/14 and T-17/15 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2) | Annuls the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/276/14, to constitute a reserve list for administrators and the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/294/14 to constitute a reserve list of administrators in the field of data protection for the European Data Protection Supervisor; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Annuls the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/276/14, to constitute a reserve list for administrators and the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/294/14 to constitute a reserve list of administrators in the field of data protection for the European Data Protection Supervisor;

| 3) | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Italian Republic; |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Italian Republic;

| 4) | Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs relating to its intervention in Case T-17/15. |
| --- | --- |

4)

Orders the Republic of Lithuania to bear its own costs relating to its intervention in Case T-17/15.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.5838 Nasolacrimal compression device. ( a ) *Identification.* A nasolacrimal compression device is a prescription device that is fitted to apply mechanical pressure to the nasal aspect of the orbital rim to reduce outflow through the nasolacrimal ducts.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9.
[81 FR 37500, June 10, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.5120 Antismooth muscle antibody immunological test system. ( a ) *Identification.* An antismooth muscle antibody immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the antismooth muscle antibodies (antibodies to nonstriated, involuntary muscle) in serum. The measurements aid in the diagnosis of chronic hepatitis (inflammation of the liver) and autoimmune connective tissue diseases (diseases resulting from antibodies produced against the body's own tissues).
( b ) *Classification* Class II (performance standards).
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3580 Knee joint patellar (hemi-knee) metallic resurfacing uncemented prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A knee joint patellar (hemi-knee) metallic resurfacing uncemented prosthesis is a device made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, intended to be implanted to replace the retropatellar articular surface of the patellofemoral joint. The device limits minimally (less than normal anatomic constraints) translation in one or more planes. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that have a retropatellar resurfacing component and an orthopedic screw to transfix the patellar remnant. This generic type of device is limited to those prostheses intended for use without bone cement (§ 888.3027).
( b ) *Classification.* ( 1 ) Class II when intended for treatment of degenerative and posttraumatic patellar arthritis.
( 2 ) Class III when intended for uses other than treatment of degenerative and posttraumatic patellar arthritis.
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before December 26, 1996 for any knee joint patellar (hemi-knee) metallic resurfacing uncemented prosthesis described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has, on or before December 26, 1996 been found to be substantially equivalent to a knee joint patellar (hemi-knee) metallic resurfacing uncemented prosthesis that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other knee joint patellar (hemi-knee) metallic resurfacing uncemented prosthesis shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 50711, Sept. 27, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 868
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 868 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 868.1920 Esophageal stethoscope with electrical conductors. ( a ) *Identification.* An esophageal stethoscope with electrical conductors is a device that is inserted into the esophagus to listen to a patient's heart and breath sounds and to monitor electrophysiological signals. The device may also incorporate a thermistor for temperature measurement.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).