alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.1374-7 Inventory. ( a ) *Valuation.* The fair market value of the inventory of an S corporation on the first day of the recognition period equals the amount that a willing buyer would pay a willing seller for the inventory in a purchase of all the S corporation's assets by a buyer that expects to continue to operate the S corporation's business. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the buyer and seller are presumed not to be under any compulsion to buy or sell and to have reasonable knowledge of all relevant facts.
( b ) *Identity of dispositions.* The inventory method used by an S corporation for tax purposes must be used to identify whether the inventory it disposes of during the recognition period is inventory it held on the first day of that period. Thus, a corporation using the LIFO method does not dispose of inventory it held on the first day of the recognition period unless the carrying value of its inventory for a taxable year during that period is less than the carrying value of its inventory on the first day of the recognition period (determined using the LIFO method as described in section 472). However, if a corporation changes its method of accounting for inventory (for example, from the FIFO method to the LIFO method or from the LIFO method to the FIFO method) with a principal purpose of avoiding the tax imposed under section 1374, it must use its former method to identify its dispositions of inventory.
[T.D. 8579, 59 FR 66469, Dec. 27, 1994]
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.2310 Apex cardiograph (vibrocardiograph). ( a ) *Identification.* An apex cardiograph (vibrocardiograph) is a device used to amplify or condition the signal from an apex cardiographic transducer and to produce a visual display of the motion of the heart; this device also provides any excitation energy required by the transducer.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
§ 1.1286-1 Tax treatment of certain stripped bonds and stripped coupons. ( a ) *De minimis OID.* If the original issue discount determined under section 1286(a) with respect to the purchase of a stripped bond or stripped coupon is less than the amount computed under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 1273(a)(3) and the regulations thereunder, then the amount of original issue discount with respect to that purchase (other than any tax-exempt portion thereof, determined under section 1286(d)(2)) shall be considered to be zero. For purposes of this computation, the number of complete years to maturity is measured from the date the stripped bond or stripped coupon is purchased.
( b ) *Treatment of certain stripped bonds as market discount bonds* — ( 1 ) *In general.* By publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)( b ) of the Statement of Procedural Rules), the Internal Revenue Service may (subject to the limitation of paragraph (b)(2) of this section) provide that certain mortgage loans that are stripped bonds are to be treated as market discount bonds under section 1278. Thus, any purchaser of such a bond is to account for any discount on the bond as market discount rather than original issue discount.
( 2 ) *Limitation.* This treatment may be provided for a stripped bond only if, immediately after the most recent disposition referred to in section 1286(b)— ( i ) The amount of original issue discount with respect to the stripped bond is determined under paragraph (a) of this section (concerning *de minimis* OID); or
( ii ) The annual stated rate of interest payable on the stripped bond is no more than 100 basis points lower than the annual stated rate of interest payable on the original bond from which it and any other stripped bond or bonds and any stripped coupon or coupons were stripped.
( c ) *Effective date.* This section is effective on and after August 8, 1991.
[T.D. 8463, 57 FR 61812, Dec. 29, 1992]
```

[115th Congress Public Law 27]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 131]]

Public Law 115-27
115th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the reappointment of Steve Case as a citizen regent of the 
   Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. <<NOTE: Apr. 19, 
                        2017 -  [S.J. Res. 30]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than 
Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the term 
of Steve Case of Virginia on April 25, 2017, is filled by the 
reappointment of the incumbent. <<NOTE: Effective date.>>  The 
reappointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on the later of April 
26, 2017, or the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.

    Approved April 19, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.J. Res. 30:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Mar. 27, considered and passed Senate.
            Apr. 6, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Footprints [electronicresource].**
PDF-v.4,n.2|PDF_v5,n1|PDF-v.6,n1
PDF-v.6,n.2|
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.21/2:W 58/

Item Number: 0650-A_01 (online)

CGP systemNumber:000991499 
October 2, 2018
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.3340 Hip joint metal/composite semi-constrained cemented prosthesis. ( a ) *Identification.* A hip joint metal/composite semi-constrained cemented prosthesis is a two-part device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. The device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. This generic type of device includes prostheses that consist of a femoral component made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and an acetabular component made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene with carbon fibers composite. Both components are intended for use with bone cement (§ 888.3027).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search USGS
-     - USGS Publications Warehouse
  - Contact
  - Explore recent publications     by USGS							   Authors
  - Browse all of Pubs Warehouse     by							   Publication type and year
  - FAQS
  - Web     Service Documentation
  - Other     Resources
  - Descriptions of US     Geological Survey Report							   Series 
- USGS Publications   Warehouse
- Explore    - Explore recent publications     by USGS							   Authors
  - Browse all of Pubs Warehouse     by							   Publication type and year 
- Documentation    - FAQS
  - Web     Service Documentation
  - Other     Resources
  - Descriptions of US     Geological Survey Report							   Series 
- Contact
Search:					    				    			                                             Descriptive petrography of three large granitic bodies in the Inyo Mountains, CaliforniaProfessional Paper 601- By:
- Donald   Clarence Ross                         
TweetLinks- More information:  National Geologic Map Database Index Page                                  (html)
- Document:  Document                                  (pdf)
- Plates:
Plate 1                                    (pdf)
Plate 2                                    (pdf)
Plate 3                                    (pdf)
Plate 4                                    (pdf)
Plate 5                                    (pdf)

- Download citation as:   RIS
AbstractAdditional publication details- Publication type:
- Report
- Publication Subtype:
- USGS Numbered Series
- Title:
- Descriptive petrography of three large granitic bodies in the Inyo   Mountains, California
- Series title:
- Professional Paper
- Series number:
- 601
- Edition:
- -
- Year Published:
- 1969
- Language:
- ENGLISH
- Publisher:
- U.S. Govt. Print. Off.,
- Description:
- 47 p.

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found here.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and					   Notices

U.S. Department of the					   Interior |				    U.S. Geological Survey				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp601                     				   Page Contact Information: Pubs Warehouse Contact				   Page				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 2012 00:05:45
§ 522.2632 Tulathromycin and ketoprofen. ( a ) *Specifications.* Each milliliter of solution contains 100 milligrams (mg) tulathromycin and 120 milligrams (mg) ketoprofen.
( b ) *Sponsor.* See No. 054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
( c ) *Related tolerances.* See §§ 556.345 and 556.745 of this chapter.
( d ) *Conditions of use* — ( 1 ) *Cattle* — ( i ) *Amount.* Administer as a single subcutaneous injection 2.5 mg tulathromycin and 3 mg ketoprofen per kilogram (1.1 mL/100 lb) of body weight.
( ii ) *Indications for use.* For the treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) associated with *Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni,* and *Mycoplasma bovis,* and control of pyrexia associated with BRD in beef steers, beef heifers, beef calves 2 months of age and older, beef bulls, dairy bulls, and replacement dairy heifers.
( iii ) *Limitations.* Not for use in reproducing animals over 1 year of age. Cattle must not be slaughtered for human consumption within 18 days following last treatment with this drug product. Not for use in female dairy cattle 1 year of age or older, including dry dairy cows; use in these cattle may cause drug residues in milk and/or in calves born to these cows or heifers. Not for use in beef calves less than 2 months of age, dairy calves, and veal calves. A withdrawal period has not been established for this product in pre-ruminating calves. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[86 FR 61685, Nov. 8, 2021]
610 P.2d 63

#### The STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Andy BAUMERT, Phoenix City Attorney, Petitioner, v. The MUNICIPAL COURT OF the CITY OF PHOENIX, Arizona, and the Honorable William Dixon, judge thereof; and Jesus G. Vega, Defendant and Real Party in Interest, Respondents.

No. 14781.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

April 9, 1980.

Andrew Baumert, City Atty., by Lindsay B. Ellis, Asst. City Prosecutor, Phoenix, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

A petition for special action was filed by the Phoenix City Attorney alleging that there is confusion at both the city court level and in the superior court as to the application of the “misdemeanor compromise statute,” A.R.S. § 13-3981. The specific case at bar involves a leaving the scene of an accident charge. The defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge on the basis of his having reached a settlement with the driver of the other car was granted. Although the defendant, real party in interest herein, did not make an appearance, we accepted jurisdiction.

It would appear that this question has been previously answered. In *State ex rel. Schafer*v. *Fenton,*104 Ariz. 160, 449 P.2d 939 (1969), where we examined the application of the compromise statute to a charge of operating an aircraft while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, we said:

> “In the instant case the damage to the airplane was only incidental to the commission of the crime and did not constitute any of the elements of the crime.” *Id.*at 162, 449 P.2d at 941.

In the case at bar the damage to another vehicle “was only incidental” to the crime of leaving the scene of an accident. *See*
      *430
      *also State ex rel. Williams v. City Court of City of Tucson,*18 Ariz.App. 394, 502 P.2d 543 (1972).

Relief granted.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23937]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8903]

In the Matter of the Designation of Amru al-Absi, Also Known as 
Abu al-Arthir, Also Known as Abu al-Asir as a Specially Designated 
Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as 
Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Amru al-Absi, 
also known as Abu al-Arthir, also known as Abu al-Asir, committed, or 
poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten 
the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign 
policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.

    Dated: September 10, 2014.

    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-23937 Filed 10-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9126-1]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) will be renewed for an additional two-year period, as a necessary committee which is in the public interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2. The purpose of EFAB is to provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on issues associated with environmental financing.

It is determined that EFAB is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by law.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Vanessa Bowie, Staff Director, Center for Environmental Finance, Ronald Reagan Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 (Mailcode 2731R), Telephone (202) 564-5186, or                     *bowie.vanessa@epa.gov.*

Dated: February 24, 2010.

Joshua Baylson,

Associate Chief Financial Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-5241 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 888 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 888.4600 Protractor for clinical use. ( a ) *Identification.* A protractor for clinical use is a device intended for use in measuring the angles of bones, such as on x-rays or in surgery.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 888.9.
[52 FR 33702, Sept. 4, 1987, as amended at 66 FR 38815, July 25, 2001]
# C_2015354EN.01003502.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — Laverana v OHIM (BIO MIT PFLANZENFLUID AUS EIGENER HERSTELLUNG)

(Case T-570/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark BIO MIT PFLANZENFLUID AUS EIGENER HERSTELLUNG - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 354/41)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laverana GmbH & Co. KG (Wennigsen, Germany) (represented by: J. Wachinger, M. Zöbisch and D. Chatterjee, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 May 2014 (Case R 124/2014-4) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign BIO MIT PFLANZENFLUID AUS EIGENER HERSTELLUNG as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Laverana GmbH & Co. KG to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laverana GmbH & Co. KG to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.

1

---
Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups






Exhibit 4.4

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Statements on Schedule 13D



The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Peter Fuchs as the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to sign on the undersigned’s behalf any or all Statements on Schedule 13D, and any or all  amendments thereto, or any other documents whatsoever, relating to the common stock of Masisa S.A., and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact or agent, full power and authority to do and perform  each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the promises, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact or agent, or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.




Dated as of 4 April 2003.





/s/ Wenceslao Casares
——————————————————
Wenceslao Casares
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 4, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10788 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANDRE BERNARD DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-77-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Andre Bernard Davis appeals the sentence of 12 months imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Davis’s sentence, which did not exceed the advisory range set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4, was not imposed in violation of law and was neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable under the facts of this case. See United States v. Hinson , 429 F.3d 114, 119-20 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , U.S. , (No. 05- 9633), 2006 WL 622263 (Apr. 17, 2006).No. 05-10788 -2- We review Davis’s contention that the district court erred by failing to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for plain error. See United States v. Gonzalez , 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir. 2001). The district court stated on the record that a 12-month sentence was necessary for punishment and deterrence, and the sentence was not unlawful. Accordingly, there is no reversible plain error. See id. at 931. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 47 (Thursday, March 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 11534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4943]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Time and Place: Tuesday, March 9, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be 
held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20571.

Open Agenda Items:
    Item No. 1 Revision of Eximbank's Environmental Procedures and 
Guidelines consistent with the Bank's Carbon Policy.
    Item No. 2 Expanding Eligibility for Short Term Products.

Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public observation 
for Items No. 1 & 2 only.

For Further Information: For further information, contact: Office of 
the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (202) 565-
3957.

Jonathan J. Cordone,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-4943 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M