alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1.105-2 Amounts expended for medical care.

Section 105(b) provides an exclusion from gross income with respect to the amounts referred to in section 105(a) (see § 1.105-1) which are paid, directly or indirectly, to the taxpayer to reimburse him for expenses incurred for the medical care (as defined in section 213(e)) of the taxpayer, his spouse, and his dependents (as defined in section 152). However, the exclusion does not apply to amounts which are attributable to (and not in excess of) deductions allowed under section 213 (relating to medical, etc., expenses) for any prior taxable year. See section 213 and the regulations thereunder. Section 105(b) applies only to amounts which are paid specifically to reimburse the taxpayer for expenses incurred by him for the prescribed medical care. Thus, section 105(b) does not apply to amounts which the taxpayer would be entitled to receive irrespective of whether or not he incurs expenses for medical care. For example, if under a wage continuation plan the taxpayer is entitled to regular wages during a period of absence from work due to sickness or injury, amounts received under such plan are not excludable from his gross income under section 105(b) even though the taxpayer may have incurred medical expenses during the period of illness. Such amounts may, however, be excludable from his gross income under section 105(d). See § 1.105-4. If the amounts are paid to the taxpayer solely to reimburse him for expenses which he incurred for the prescribed medical care, section 105(b) is applicable even though such amounts are paid without proof of the amount of the actual expenses incurred by the taxpayer, but section 105(b) is not applicable to the extent that such amounts exceed the amount of the actual expenses for such medical care. If the taxpayer incurs an obligation for medical care, payment to the obligee in discharge of such obligation shall constitute indirect payment to the taxpayer as reimbursement for medical care. Similarly, payment to or on behalf of the taxpayer's spouse or dependents shall constitute indirect payment to the taxpayer.
<Page>

                                                                          [LOGO]

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to Registration
Statement No. 033-71688 of First Fortis Life Insurance Company Separate Account
A of our report dated February 28, 2003, relating to the financial statements of
First Fortis Life Insurance Company Separate Account A, appearing in the
Statement of Additional Information, which is part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public
Accountants" in such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

69–012 2017

115th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–37 

DESIGNATION OF FUNDING FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS/GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

DESIGNATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS/GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM ALL FUNDING (INCLUDING THE RESCISSION OF FUNDS) AND CONTRIBUTIONS FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS SO DESIGNATED BY THE CONGRESS, PURSUANT TO THE 

CONSOLIDATED APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2017, SEC. 6(b) 

MAY 8, 2017.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered 

to be printed 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, May 5, 2017. 

Hon. PAUL D. RYAN, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In accordance with section 6(b) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby designate 

for Overseas Contingency Operations/Global War on Terrorism all 

funding (including the rescission of funds) and contributions from 

foreign governments so designated by the Congress in the Act pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended, as outlined in the 

enclosed list of accounts. 

The details of this action are set forth in the enclosed memorandum from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 

Sincerely, 

DONALD J. TRUMP. 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with REPORTS
2 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 3 here HD37.001
3 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 4 here HD37.002
4 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 5 here HD37.003
5 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 6 here HD37.004
6 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with REPORTSInsert offset folio 7 here HD37.005
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40777

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS ALBERTO LOPEZ-SAENZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-147-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Alberto 

Lopez-Saenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Saenz has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40777 Document: 00513473043 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-40777

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40777 Document: 00513473043 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 333-101953 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company Separate
Account Ten of our report dated March 26, 2003, relating to the financial
statements of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company, and of our report
dated February 21, 2003, relating to the financial statements of Hartford Life
and Annuity Insurance Company Separate Account Ten, appearing in the Statement
of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in
such Statement of Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

April 7, 2003
Exhibit 34.6



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,
Inc. (the Company), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 4, 2016



LOGO



LOGO

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.5450 Patient care reverse isolation chamber. ( a ) *Identification.* A patient care reverse isolation chamber is a device consisting of a roomlike enclosure designed to prevent the entry of harmful airborne material. This device protects a patient who is undergoing treatment for burns or is lacking a normal immunosuppressive defense due to therapy or congenital abnormality. The device includes fans and air filters which maintain an atmosphere of clean air at a pressure greater than the air pressure outside the enclosure.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
38933.

#### TREADWAY v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY.

Decided September 28, 1961.

*478
      *N. Forrest Montet,*for plaintiff in error.

*Louis D. Yancey, Jr.,*contra.

Frankum, Judge.

The defendant contends that the bond is limited to the company listed on the application only, and he also contends that Augusta Mill Supply cannot be considered the same concern as Augusta Mill Supply Co. We are of the opinion that it is unnecessary to detennine these questions. Regardless of any application by the employee for a bond or contents of such application, the indemnity contract (bond) shows upon its face to be between the companies named, as the insured, and the plaintiff, whereby the latter agreed to indemnify the insured against any defalcation of its employees.

This court recognizes that there is a distinction betweén a contract of surety and indemnity, but it is unecessary to determine whether the contract in the instant case is one of surety or indemnity. See *John Church Co. v. Aetna Indem. Co.,*13 Ga. App. 826 (80 SE 1093); 42 C.J.S. 566, Indemnity, § 3. As stated in *Yorkshire Ins. Co. v. Cravey,*102 Ga. App. 591, 596 (117 SE2d 167): “A petition merely serves, among other purposes, to set forth sufficient facts to show the plaintiff has a right *479for which the law supplies a remedy." Under the ruling of *Lumpkin v. American Surety Co.,*61 Ga. App. 777 (7 SE2d 687), and *First Nat. Bank v. American Surety Co.,*71 Ga. App. 112 (30 SE2d 402), the petition alleges sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action upon the basis that the defendant’s employers have assigned their cause of action against the defendant to the plaintiff. The petition sets forth sufficient facts to allege a cause of action, and the trial court did not err in overruling the general and special demurrers.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Townsend, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Penions Assets Partnership 1989-1, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained  in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         171,849
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               294,341
<PP&E>                                         3,098,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,920,775)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,471,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,894
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,466,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,471,950
<SALES>                                        213,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               217,174
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  87,007<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                92,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            92,998
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   92,998
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
July 9, 2015

Mr. Norman Whitehurst

2845 Notre Dame Blvd.

Suite 370-101

Chico, CA 95928

Dear Mr. Whitehurst:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your July 1st 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2678), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1989-1, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         75,279
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  71,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,341
<PP&E>                                         3,075,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,550,656)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 671,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,006
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     667,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   671,007
<SALES>                                        175,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               176,789
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  83,896<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                48,383
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            48,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   48,383
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

134) ll-E-94 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07 AM Sheet 134 of 264 
P.2 

04/04/1997 16:13 6127869601 SPACE TABLES INC 

PES RTP NC 

PAGE 01 

% 002/002 

From: 

Date; 

Contact: 

Company: 

A 945 2 

Mr£_r<M 

Contact Report 

Plastic Composites NESHAP 

Greg LaFlam, Pacific Environmental Services. Inc. (PES) 

April 3,1997 

Greg Erickson 

Space Tables, Inc., Minneapolis, MM 

Telephone Number: (612)786-9301 

Contact Summary: 

The facility manufactures indoor furniture using spray layup and gel coating processes. 

The low profile polyester resin used at the facility is supplied by Interplastic Corp., code number 

54-191-587. Filler is used in aratio of 50 percent by weight of the total resin mixture (e.g.. 100 

pounds of filler used per 100 pounds of resin). 

The facility's operating schedule is 1 shift per day, 5 days per week. The spray up booth 

is in operation approximately 3 hours per day. 

REPORT IS ACCURATE //7 .<i^/
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   ----------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 15, 2001
                                                  -------------

                             YOUNETWORK CORPORATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter

Delaware                            0-252385                    13-3990305
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction      (Commission                 (IRS Employer
of Incorporation)                  File Number)           Identification Number)

18 West 18th Street, New York, New York                                  10011
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                              (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 647-8901
                                                    --------------


<PAGE>

                       INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT

ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS

      On June 15,  2001,  the  Company's  Board of Directors  elected  Edward A.
Foster as a  Director  of the  Company.  Mr.  Foster  is  currently  serving  as
President  and  Chief  Operating  Officer  of  International  Commerce  Exchange
Systems, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer of Compuces, Inc. At the same meeting,
the Company's  Board of Directors  accepted the  resignation of Mordy Gelber,  a
Director of the Company.

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                               YOUNETWORK CORPORATION

                                               By: /s/ Joseph C. Sienkiewicz
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: June 21, 2001