alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


2010 Meetings of the Big Cypress National Preserve Off-Road 
Vehicle (ORV) Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, National Park Service, ORV Advisory 
Committee.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, 10), notice is hereby given of 
the meetings of the Big Cypress National Preserve ORV Advisory 
Committee for 2010.

DATES: The Committee will meet on the following dates:
    Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 3:30-8 p.m.
    Tuesday, April 20, 2010, 3:30-8 p.m.
    Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 3:30-8 p.m.
    Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 3:30-8 p.m.
    Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 3:30-8 p.m.
    Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 3:30-8 p.m.

ADDRESSES: All meetings will be held at the Big Cypress Swamp Welcome 
Center, 33000 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, Florida. Written comments 
and requests for agenda items may be submitted electronically on the 
Web site http://www.nps.gov/bicy/parkmgmt/orv-advisory-committee.htm. 
Alternatively, comments and requests may be sent to: Superintendent, 
Big Cypress National Preserve, 33100 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, FL 
34141-1000, Attn: ORV Advisory Committee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramos, Superintendent, Big 
Cypress National Preserve, 33100 Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, Florida 
34141-1000; 239-695-1103, or go to the Web site http://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?parkId=352&projectId=20437.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was established (Federal 
Register, August 1, 2007, pp. 42108-42109) pursuant to the Preserve's 
2000 Recreational Off-road Vehicle Management Plan and the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. Appendix) to examine issues 
and make recommendations regarding the management of off-road vehicles 
(ORVs) in the Preserve. The agendas for these meetings will be 
published by press release and on the http://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?parkId=352&projectId=20437 Web site. The meetings will 
be open to the public, and time will be reserved for public comment. 
Oral comments will be summarized for the record. If individuals wish to 
have their comments recorded verbatim, they must submit them in 
writing.

Pedro Ramos,
Superintendent, Big Cypress National Preserve.
[FR Doc. 2010-445 Filed 1-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      462
<ALLOWANCES>                                        69
<INVENTORY>                                      4,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,512
<PP&E>                                          44,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,666
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,467
<SALES>                                            641
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   641
<CGS>                                            1,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,449<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,343)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES are for R&D incurred in developing product for market
EPS-PRIMARY reflects a reverse two for three stock split and the proforma
restatement of outstanding preferred shares associated with the company's
initial public offering on July 30, 1999. In addition, $17,915 of stock
dividends issued to preferred stockholders were included in the net loss
applicable to common stockholders in calculating the EPS-PRIMARY number.
</FN>


</TABLE>
(LOGO)

OCWEN

MANAGEMENT ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE WITH USAP

July 14, 1999

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, with respect to certain mortgage
loan  pools  for  which  the  trustee  is  Norwest  Bank   Minnesota,   National
Association,  except as  specifically  noted below,  Ocwen Federal Bank FSB (the
"Bank")  has  complied  in all  material  respects  with the  minimum  servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  (MBA's)
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").

*  Standard:   Custodial  bank  accounts  and  related  bank  clearing   account
reconciliations shall be prepared within 45 calendar days after the cuttoff date
and documented  reconciling  items shall be resolved  within 90 calendar days of
their original identification.

The Bank's 1998 custodial  account  reconciliations  were not prepared within 45
days after the cutoff date.  However,  these  reconciliations and all subsequent
reconciliations have subsequently been prepared through April 30, 1999.

In  addition,  certain  reconciling  items  which  arose  during  the year ended
December  31,  1998 were not  specifically  identified  and/or  were not cleared
within 90 days of  identification.  Management  has developed an action plan and
has continued to follow the action plan to resolve all  outstanding  reconciling
items. All significant  reconciling items have been isolated and reviewed by the
Company, and the Company believes these items will not have a material impact on
the status of any custodial accounts.

*Standard: Each custodial account shall be maintained at a federally insured
depository institution in trust for the applicable investor.

During 1998, certain investor custodial accounts did not indicate that they were
"in trust for" accounts in the account  title.  However,  as of the date of this
assertion,  the  accounts  were changed to include "in trust for" in the account
titles.

*Standard: Mortgage payments shall be deposited into the custodial bank accounts
and related bank clearing accounts within two business days of receipt.

Mortgage  payments  were  credited  to  the  investors  in the  Bank's  internal
servicing records within two business days of receipt. However, certain mortgage
payments were not deposited into  investors'  custodial bank accounts within two
business days of receipt.

*Standard:  Escrow funds held in trust for a mortgagor  shall be returned to the
mortgagor within thirty (30) calendar days of payoff of the mortgage loan.

During 1998, escrow funds held in trust for certain mortgagors were not returned
to the  mortgagor  within  thirty  days of the  payoff of their  mortgage  loan.
However,  these escrow funds were returned within the required number of days as
required by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

As of and for this same  period,  the Bank had in effect a fidelity  bond in the
amount  of  $15,000,000  and an errors  and  omissions  policy in the  amount of
$10,000,000.

Christine A. Reich
President

Scott W. Anderson
Vice President of Residential Assets

Scott A. Johnson
Supervisor of Investor Reporting
38972.

38978.

#### STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. WORLEY. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. MURPHY.

Carlisle, Presiding Judge.

These cases are appeals to a jury in the superior court from the award of the special master in condemnation proceedings brought by the State Highway Department to acquire portions of the condemnees’ lands for highway use. The jury in each case returned verdicts awarding sums of money to the condemnees; the State High*334way Department filed its motion for a new trial, which in each case was amended by the addition of special grounds. Those motions were overruled and the exceptions here are to those judgments.

Decided September 6, 1961.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, E. J. Summerour, Carter Goode, Assistant Attomeys-General, Wright ■& Reddick, Gray-don D. Reddick,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mixon & Forrester, George M. Mixon,*contra.

In each case what purports to be a brief of the evidence contains numerous instances of colloquies between court and counsel and counsel and counsel, statements as to stipulated facts, announcements by counsel as to the procedure agreed upon between counsel for proceeding and other immaterial matter, much, but not all of which, has been deleted by being stricken through with a typewriter. The Supreme Court has held in a number of instances that matter which is to be deleted from the record under the provisions of *Code Ann.*§ 70-305 must be physically removed from the record and not merely deleted by being stricken through with a pen, pencil or typewriter. This is not a proper practice. See *Williamson v. Yakupian,*211 Ga. 61 (84 SE2d 15); *Keith v. State,*213 Ga. 743 (101 SE2d 705); *Evans v. Anderson,*214 Ga. 828 (108 SE2d 268); and *Moore v. Moore,*215 Ga. 47, 48 (3) (108 SE2d 704), and cits. Under the rulings announced in the foregoing authorities, the appellate court will not consider any assignment of error which requires reference to the evidence when the evidence is not properly briefed or the stenographic report properly purged of immaterial and irrelevant matter. In these cases it is apparent that no bona fide effort was made to brief the evidence or to delete immaterial and irrelevant matter therefrom, and since a consideration of the evidence is necessary in order to pass upon all of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, both general and special, this court will merely affirm the judgment overruling the motion.

*Judgments affirmed.*

*Nichols and Eherhardt, JJ., concur.*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 17, 2018

No. 04-17-00741-CV

Edward R. MEZA Jr., Sylvia Meza, and New Braunfels Home Health, Inc. d/b/a N.B. Home 

Health,

Appellants

v.

HONORCARE HOME HEALTH INC.,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 376006

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After this court granted one previous extension, appellee’s brief was due August 15, 

2018. On the due date, appellee filed a second motion for extension of time, asking for an 

additional seven days in which to file the brief. The motion is unopposed. After review, we 

GRANT appellee’s motion and ORDER appellee to file its brief in this court on or before 

August 22, 2018.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of August, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 20, 2015

No. 04-15-00397-CV

ESTATE OF LUISA R. MONTEMAYOR,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-PC-3012

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to September 15, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Marcelo R. Montemayor

PO Box 831651

San Antonio, TX 78283

Reed Greene

Reed Greene Law Office

26254 IH 10 West

Suite 135

Boerne, TX 78006
§ 606.20 Personnel. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) The personnel responsible for the collection, processing, compatibility testing, storage or distribution of blood or blood components shall be adequate in number, educational background, training and experience, including professional training as necessary, or combination thereof, to assure competent performance of their assigned functions, and to ensure that the final product has the safety, purity, potency, identity and effectiveness it purports or is represented to possess. All personnel shall have capabilities commensurate with their assigned functions, a thorough understanding of the procedures or control operations they perform, the necessary training or experience, and adequate information concerning the application of pertinent provisions of this part to their respective functions.
( c ) Persons whose presence can adversely affect the safety and purity of the products shall be excluded from areas where the collection, processing, compatibility testing, storage or distribution of blood or blood components is conducted.
[40 FR 53532, Nov. 18, 1975, as amended at 49 FR 23833, June 8, 1984; 55 FR 11014, Mar. 26, 1990; 62 FR 53538, Oct. 15, 1997]
# C_2016027EN.01004601.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2015 — NICO v Council

(Case T-371/14) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment))

(2016/C 027/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl (Pully, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, P. Gjørtler, G. Pandey, D. Rovetta and N. Pilkington, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Council decision contained in the letter of 14 March 2014 by which the applicant’s name was maintained on the list of person and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39), as amended by Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 58), and in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012 (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 16).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Naftiran Intertrade Co. (NICO) Sàrl to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

*Date/Time:*                     Tuesday, March 16, 2010. 11 a.m.-12 p.m.                

*Location:*                     1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011.                

*Status:*                     Board Executive Session—Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) of section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in subsection I 706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-525.                

*Agenda:*                     March 16, 2010 Board Executive Session. Approval of Board Resolutions; Transition discussions.                 

*Contact:*                     Tessie F. Higgs, Executive Assistant, Telephone: (202) 429-3836.                

Dated: March 3, 2010.

Tara Sonenshine,

Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.

[FR Doc. 2010-4958 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-P
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

March 31, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00548

- CR

Nicolas C. FLORES

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 8, Be xar County, Texas Trial Court No. 355026 The Honorable Liza Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due to be filed with this court on February 24

, 201 4

. This court granted the State’s first motion for an extension of time to file the brief until March
26 , 201 4 . On March 28, 2014, the State filed its brief and a second motion for an exte nsion of
time to file its brief.

The State’s motion is GRANTED ; its brief is deemed timely filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alv arez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hot tle Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Jonathan Ali Chtay, Appellant

No. 06-14-00032-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 196th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 22,940). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Jonathan Ali Chtay, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 22, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVEN A. HANNA, Defendant-Appellant.

Fourth District

No. 4—95—0881

Opinion filed May 2, 1997.
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

for an allocation of U.S.

- China f requencies

(two additional Detroit

- Beijing frequencies) )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0285

APPLICATION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director

– Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

1212 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 842

- 4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

Note: Polling response requested by reply email.

August 21, 2012BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF T RANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

for an allocation of U.S.

- China Frequencies

(two additional Detroit

- Beijing frequencies) )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0285

APPLICATION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) hereby applies for two (2) additional Zone 1 U.S.

-

China combination frequencies, so that Delta can increase service on the Detroit

- Beijing

route f rom five weekly fligh ts to daily nonstop service. Delta proposes to increase

service on or about October 28 th , 2012, using Boeing 777

- 200ER aircraft outfitted with

2 69 seats (45 flat bed seats in BusinessElite , 36 Economy Comfort and 188 standard

economy seats ).

Delta’s request is in the public interest. By NOAT dated November 24, 2010 in

this docket, Delta was awarded five frequencies for Detroit

- Beijing service. Those

frequencies have been successfully implemented, and the proposed frequency increase

w ill enable Delta to offer it s customers a full daily service pattern

.

Delta’s request is fully consistent with the U.S.

- China air transport agreement.

T here are more than ample Zone 1 frequencies available in the U.S. unallocated pool to

fund the additi onal service. There are currently 37 such combination frequencies

available.Application of Delta

Page 2

Delta will conduct a poll of carrier representatives served with this application and

advise the Department of the results. We respectfully request expedited approval so

that t he new services can be offered for sale as quickly as possible.

Delta anticipates no difficulty obtaining fuel for the proposed services from its

regular supplier. The environmental impacts of the service will be de minimis . Because

Delta would otherwi se fully deploy these aircraft elsewhere in its network, there will not

be a near term net change in aircraft fuel consumption of more than 10 million gallons.

Respectfully submitted,

_________________________________ Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director, Government Affairs

& Associate General Counsel

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Motion has been served this 21 st day of August , 2012, upon the

following persons via email:

dan.weiss@united.com

jon athan.linde@united.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

francis.heil@aa.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

keith.glatz@dot.gov

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov

info@airlineinfo.com