alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014303EN.01003501.xml

| 8.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/35

---

Action brought on 11 June 2014 — ClientEarth v Commission

(Case T-425/14)

2014/C 303/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. Brouwer, F. Heringa and J. Wolfhagen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision to refuse access to documents requested by the applicant pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, as communicated to the Applicant on 1 April 2014 in a letter with the reference SG.B.4/LR/rc-sg.dsg2.b.4(2014) 1029188; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision to refuse access to documents requested by the applicant pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, as communicated to the Applicant on 1 April 2014 in a letter with the reference SG.B.4/LR/rc-sg.dsg2.b.4(2014) 1029188;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, including the costs of any intervening parties. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, including the costs of any intervening parties.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Commission’s decision to refuse access to the Commission’s Impact Assessment Report, as well as the opinion of the Impact Assessment Board regarding the revision of the EU legal framework on environmental inspections and surveillance at national and EU level.

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-424/14, ClientEarth v Commission.

ClientEarth

Commission

---
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.2320 Differential culture medium. ( a ) *Identification.* A differential culture medium is a device that consists primarily of liquid biological materials intended for medical purposes to cultivate and identify different types of pathogenic microorganisms. The identification of these microorganisms is accomplished by the addition of a specific biochemical component(s) to the medium. Microorganisms are identified by a visible change (e.g., a color change) in a specific biochemical component(s) which indicates that specific metabolic reactions have occurred. Test results aid in the diagnosis of disease and also provide epidemiological information on diseases caused by these microorganisms.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 25046, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38790, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.2680 Microtitrator for clinical use. ( a ) *Identification.* A microtitrator for clinical use is a device intended for use in micronanalysis to measure the concentration of a substance by reacting it with a measure “micro” volume of a known standardized solution.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2309, Jan. 14, 2000]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officerof The Timberland Company (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to theundersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.             The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending July 1, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2005 fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
|   /S/ BRIAN  P. MCKEON |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Brian P. McKeon                  |
| Chief Financial Officer          |

 

Date: August 10,2005

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part ofthe Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to TheTimberland Company and will be retained by The Timberland Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): July 10, 2003

                           Commission File No. 1-16263

                           MARINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION
             (exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

            Delaware                                            58-2572419
  (State or other jurisdiction                               (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)                         Identification Number)

                 2170 Piedmont Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30324
               (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

                                 (404) 321-7910
               Registrant's telephone number, including area code

<PAGE>

Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD disclosure

On July 10, 2003,  registrant  issued a press release  entitled "Marine Products
Corporation  Reports Stock  Buyback,"  that  announces the  repurchase of 95,000
shares of Marine Products  Corporation common stock during the second quarter of
2003.

Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits

      (c) Exhibits.

            Exhibit 99 - Press release dated July 10, 2003.

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                           Marine Products Corporation.

Date: July 10, 2003                        /s/ BEN M. PALMER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Ben M. Palmer
                                           Vice President,
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1530 Plasma oncometry test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A plasma oncometry test system is a device intended to measure plasma oncotic pressure. Plasma oncotic pressure is that portion of the total fluid pressure contributed by proteins and other molecules too large to pass through a specified membrane. Measurements of plasma oncotic pressure are used in the diagnosis and treatment of dehydration and circulatory disorders related to low serum protein levels and increased capillary permeability, such as edema and shock.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2307, Jan. 14, 2000]
Certificate of Trust of BAC Capital Trust VI


 
EXHIBIT 4.3

 
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 
The undersigned, the trustees of BAC Capital Trust VI,
desiring to form a statutory trust pursuant to Delaware Statutory Trust Act, 12 Del. C. § 3810, hereby certify as follows: 
 

	 	(a)	 	The name of the statutory trust being formed hereby (the “Trust”) is “BAC Capital Trust VI.” 

 

	 	(b)	 	The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is as follows:


 
The Bank of New
York (Delaware) 
502 White Clay Center, Route 273 
Newark, Delaware 19711 
 

	 	(c)	 	This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of filing. 

 
Dated:  March 14, 2003 
 

	
	 	 	 /s/    JAMES T.
HOUGHTON        


	 Name:
	 	 James T. Houghton

	 Title:
	 	 Regular Trustee

	
	 	 	 /s/    Karen A.
Gosnell        


	 Name:
	 	 Karen A. Gosnell

	 Title:
	 	 Regular Trustee

	
	 THE BANK OF NEW
YORK

	 (Delaware), as Delaware Trustee

	
	 By:
	 	 /s/    PATRICK
BURNS        


	 Name:
	 	 Patrick Burns

	 Title:
	 	 Senior Vice President
J AMES F. M ARTENS*

K ELLI H. T ODD
L ACY L. L EONARD

─ ── ────── ──── ─── ─ Attorneys at Law

─ ── ────── ──── ─── ─ *Board Certified in Tax Law Texas Board of Legal Specialization 

## M ARTENS 

## , T ODD 

## , L EONARD 

## , T AYLOR 

## & A HLRICH

A G ENERAL 

### P ARTNERSHIP

─────────────────────────────── 301 C ONGRESS A VENUE

, S UITE 1950

A USTIN

, T EXAS 78701 (512) 542- 9898

FAX (512) 542- 9899

www.textaxlaw.com A MANDA G. T AYLOR
D ANIELLE V. A HLRICH
A LLEGRA D. H ILL

─ ── ───── ── ── ── ─── Attorneys at Law

─ ── ───── ── ── ── ───



## August 5, 2015

Via E-Filing Court of Appeals

Third District of Texas Attn: The Honorable Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk Price Daniel Sr. Building

209 West 14 th 

## Street, Room 101 Austin, Texas 78701

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 03- 14

- 00 510- CV Trial Court Number: D-1- GN

- 13 -002811

Noah S. Bunker, Paul Carrell, Everett Brew Houston, Jr., W. Andrew Buchholz, Scott J. Leighty, Jad L. Davis, and Holly Clause, Appellants v. Tracy D. Strandhagen, Appellee

Dear Mr. Kyle:

In accordance with the Clerk’s request, please accept this letter as notification that Amanda G. Taylor of Martens, Todd, Leonard, Taylor & Ahlrich intends to present oral argument on behalf of Appellants

, Bunker et. al

., on September 16, 2015 at 1:30 am.

Sincerely,

M ARTENS



## , T ODD



## , L EONARD



## , T AYLOR 

## & A HLRICH



## By: /s/ Amanda Taylor


## Amanda Garrett Taylor ataylor@textaxlaw.com

Texas Bar No. 24045921 ACCEPTED
03-14-00510-CV

6368689
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
8/5/2015 2:10:05 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

## cc: Via E

- service to:

Dan Byrne, DByrne@FBHF.com Lessie Fitzpatrick, LFitzpatrick@FBHF.com Christine Burgess, CBurgess@FBHF.com

C ounsel for Appellee Tracy D. Strandhagen
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.3670 Pacemaker charger. ( a ) *Identification.* A pacemaker charger is a device used transcutaneously to recharge the batteries of a rechargeable pacemaker.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 870.9.
[45 FR 7907, Feb. 5, 1980, as amended at 61 FR 1121, Jan. 16, 1996; 66 FR 38796, July 25, 2001]
# C_2014361EN.01001101.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/11

---

Action brought on 5 June 2014 — Best-Lock (Europe) v OHIM — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure)

(Case T-398/14)

2014/C 361/14

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Best-Lock (Europe) (Colne, United Kingdom) (represented by: W. Krahl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lego Juris A/S (Billund, Denmark)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 April 2014 in Case R 1896/2013-4 and declare Community trade mark No 50  518 with respect to Class 28 to be revoked; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 April 2014 in Case R 1896/2013-4 and declare Community trade mark No 50  518 with respect to Class 28 to be revoked;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: Three-dimensional mark in the shape of a toy figure for goods in Classes 9, 25 and 28 — Community trade mark No 50  518

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Lego Juris A/S

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection in part of the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a) and 15(2)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Editorial Note on Part 870
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 870 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 870.1450 Densitometer. ( a ) *Identification.* A densitometer is a device used to measure the transmission of light through an indicator in a sample of blood.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 95 (Thursday, May 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 28796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-11048]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 28796]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

[Doc. No. AMS-FV-13-0002]

Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) Inviting Applications for the 
Specialty Crop Block Grant Program-Farm Bill (SCBGP-FB)

Correction

    In notice document 2013-11048, appearing on pages 27178-27181 in 
the issue of Thursday, May 9, 2013, make the following correction:
    In the table appearing on page 27181, in the second column, the 
second line ``85,231.03'' should read, ``185,231.03''.

[FR Doc. C1-2013-11048 Filed 5-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 18, 2003

                       EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                         Commission file number: 0-4957

           Delaware                                           73-0750007
(State or other jurisdiction of                           (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                            Identification No.)

                10302 East 55th Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74146-6515
              (Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

                                 (918) 622-4522
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


<PAGE>

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

      (c) EXHIBITS

            99.1 Press release dated as of June 18, 2003

ITEM 9. REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE

      In  accordance  with General  Instruction  B.2. of Form 8-K, the following
information and the exhibits  referenced therein shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  nor
shall it or they be deemed  incorporated  by  reference  in any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

                On June 18, 2003, Educational Development Corporation, announced
via press release record 1st quarter profits. A copy of the press release is
attached hereto.


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

    Educational Development Corporation

By: /s/ Randall W. White
    --------------------------------
    Randall W. White
    President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 18, 2003


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT
NUMBER            DESCRIPTION
------            -----------

*99.1             Press release dated as of June 18, 2003

----------
*Filed herewith.
##### 



Exhibit 32(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Republic Bancorp Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 7, 2004
    
    /s/ Dana M. CluckeyName:
    
    Dana M. CluckeyTitle:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
 The foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, (ii) will not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Republic Bancorp Inc.
and will be retained by Republic Bancorp Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Cite as State v. Wells , 2020-Ohio-1187.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, Appellee,

- vs -

JERRY K. WELLS, Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NOS. CA2019-10-106 CA2019-10-112

D E C I S I O N 3/30/2020

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN CO UNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. 16CR0312217

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Kirsten A. Brandt, 520 Justice Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for appellee Jeffery E. Richards, 147 Miami Street, P.O. Box 536, Waynesvill e, Ohio 45068, for appellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal fil ed by appellant, Jerry K. Wells, the transcript of the docket and jou rnal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful reviewWarren CA2019-10-106 CA2019-10-112

- 2 - of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal,"

Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free fro m prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withd raw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no res ponse having been received, we have accordingly examined the record a nd find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tri al court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is gran ted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.