alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Douglas W. Cowan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Retractable Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report
financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



/s/ DOUGLAS W. COWANDOUGLAS W. COWANVICE PRESIDENT ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

________________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 133416(43) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

COMMUNITY RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, 

INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 133416 

v COA: 269726 

Ingham CC: 04-000879-CK

PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension 

to November 9, 2007 of the time for filing its supplemental brief is considered and it is 

GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 30, 2007 

 Clerk
•2 Mississippi 

Melvin Mack 

Mayor 

dd(^-f TXivt^r-xcdHocy^ 

April 13, 2010 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

S**" Floor, Room W86-472 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: EAS Order 2010-2-29 

crj 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

The City of Laurel is in receipt of the proposals from Mesaba Airlines, d/b/a Delta 

Airlines and Sovereign Air, Inc. to provide essential air service to the citizens of the 

Laurel-Hattiesburg region. 

Currently the City of Laurel has survived the recession due to the vital role of Camp 

Shelby as a mobilization center for our armed forces. The Howard Technology Park, 

along with Jones County Junior College, continues to attract high tech jobs to the area. 

Therefore, the City of Laurel proposes acceptance of Mesaba Airlines to provide essential 

air service. Based on past service and performance to the area, seat capacity, hub location 

and more connections for travelers, we feel that Mesaba is a better choice and will 

continue to help our community grow. 

We appreciate your past efforts in securing an essential air service carrier and your 

cooperation in our endeavor to maintain the highest possible level of air service for our 

citizens. 

Sincerely, 

Mel-mMaclc, Mayor 

City of Laurel 

P. O. Box 647 / Laurel, MS 39441 / Phone (601) 428-6401 / Fax (601) 428-6403
# C_2015007EN.01006102.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/61

---

Action brought on 16 November 2014 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-131/14)

(2015/C 007/80)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to increase the salary of the applicant, who is a member of the contract staff, following the increase in working hours to 40 hours a week as a result of the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations on 1 January 2014.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul his salary slip in respect of January 2014 in so far as it records and lays down discrimination in terms of salary between himself and a colleague who, working in the same sector as he is and with less responsibility than him, is better paid in terms of gross salary than he is; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul his salary slip in respect of January 2014 in so far as it records and lays down discrimination in terms of salary between himself and a colleague who, working in the same sector as he is and with less responsibility than him, is better paid in terms of gross salary than he is;

| — | Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

---
!  
	 

 # $%&'(&
   

• 
 # 
	)	


* +,   -%*

*%
-



 .

•  &''/%
 # ,   -

 
	 0$ 	1

• /23 
 	 
	

• &/3 ,  	#

• (43  
	%
%

,  	#%
 5	

• 
 # - 
	 	

 
	%#
#5*
%


	
	 	 

	 	6

•  7 "
	 &80+9 	!  
.

	# 

 &$%&'((

  	



 


 
 

 
 , 	
	  



 +759 

 - 
 , 	*	

	, 5#
* 
- #

 *5 =  , 	*

&''$> &'('.
	    
  	  

  
  "# $ %&

? 
	 	@ 
	 
%	%*%	

	*	% 

 	  

 

7
	 * 	5


>"#	> 

 - 	 



 > -  	


 	



  , , >

7
	  , , 

	 	 

	>  


 
 

 - 	 

 

 
	 	 7


B	
 
 


	 > # 57 

7* 
	
 #*
 ,   
  -

	 
  
	   	  





  	 


•  "
	+"; &6/. C  
 	
	

  
 	

• B*
 *
C 
  %	*

%
 %
 *


• 9 *
  
C 
%1%	%	



• ; 	

   
. %*'  -

• 	<	 
  
  	

	 	 %



*
 
, 


• B
 "; &6/ 
 

	 
	

 	 +%
	 
.

• B
 "; &6/ 
 

	 
#



 	 +%	 
%
	 	


*%
	 
		
-.
/  0
  	1
 
. %*' 02	

D	 	 # 
	
# 


#

	

	 , 	 <
 

 	 #
.  	 "; %



	 	 

  
%#
 		

  	 
*  
-	 


  
	% 	
%	  



*
	6E

  
!	"  ##$ %

	  ) 	 

3 	

 $3  

• (44$)  *  
	*
%(

 

	  	 
	  

• ,  , - 	 # 	
	 +
 	
-.

• &''0),  
,%F	 9 !  G*
<


	A

• &''$)7  	
	# 	 	
-%

	 	 	
* 
	 #
	

• "
	 $   
	
 7 

!  ; 
 	 H 


• &''$) H

	 

#	*
	%
 


%	 
- 

• 
 # 	


 	* I ,  




* 		 

• 	6&''$) 7
 		 

	 
	%9 !  

# 
	
 45

• Deployed DataRAM 4000

– Nephelometry – real-time PM2.5

(smoke indicator)

– complaint location (nearfield) 100 ft

– Control location (reference) 2,600 ft

– No other obvious substantial

sources nearby

• Meteorological station (realtime)

• 1 week monitoring period

(time-synced instruments)

• Observation logs and site

visits
#   6 
	 

9  	 J	 9  	 J	 C 9 ! 
 B 
	 9  	 

9 ! 
 B 

(mcg/m

3

)
(

mcg/m

3

)

B 	 C

   	6
	


 5	
7  
. %*' 4

 @ K"; L 
 < K"; L 
 	
 	

• "; &6/ #
#
* *
	 	  
	 
	 

	
	 I  -  
	# M	 

•  "; &6/ #,  *
		 ,  	 


	 , 
, <,  
 
	#,  

9 ! 

– , , ) #
* "; &6/ #,  06/  *5 = *
	 

	
 

– N , ) #
* "; &6/ #,  '622  *5 = *
	 



) 
 $ 58 9(  $ 58

O  	 ; 
 (=6= 46(

;   '6$ '60

; 
  (0&6/ $'64
 	
  5

• ; 	* 	
	 
 
#
* 


#
   M	 #
	 

 	 -  	  -  	 ,  

• 
#
* 
 "; &6/ #
%



	 

  	  

-

• H*<	 	 "; &6/   - 



 

	 , 	 # 	 


#


 
	 


• * 
 - 
 
	 	

 ,    
 
	

#
		 
	  

• !   - 
 
 
	 	%	 - 	

		 , 	 "; &6/  < 9    


 - 

• 	* 	 
    	
	%   	

	M
   	 	 ,   - 

	  	 
	

• 9 	
 , - 
	 9 ! +* / < 



	>  	.

– "; &6/ # *
	 #
	 
	 / 2  	* 
	

9 ! 
	# 	 	
	 
	 + ≤ '6'(.

– , ,  
 
 , +	 
	 *	. ,  

	 

#
	 "; &6/ #

 
 
 
) :43 ) 		)55, , , 6
	66*#5# 	
5	5
5) :40) 		)55, , , 666*#5 
5/(4$26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on page 2 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-Q for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                  424,146
<SECURITIES>                          3,242,036
<RECEIVABLES>                           870,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                           1,253,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      6,637,912
<PP&E>                                4,795,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       11,957,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   757,097
<BONDS>                                       0
<COMMON>                             10,765,438
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                              (76,154)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         11,957,909
<SALES>                              10,325,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     10,325,714
<CGS>                                 7,317,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         7,317,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      2,757,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         371,817
<INCOME-TAX>                            148,727
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     223,090
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        (108,600)
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            114,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .01

</TABLE>
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released June 27, 2023)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

None Available

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
# C_2015381EN.01005902.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/59

---

Order of the General Court of 15 September 2015 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-594/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 381/76)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.

1

---
# C_2015294EN.01006601.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/66

---

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Bayer MaterialScience v Commission

(Case T-282/14) (1)

1

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/80)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bayer MaterialScience AG (Leverkusen, Germany) (represented by: C. Arhold, L. Petersen, F.-A. Wesche, N. Wimmer and T. Woltering, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by C. von Donat and G. Quardt, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

| 3. | Bayer MaterialScience AG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Bayer MaterialScience AG shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

# Written Statement of
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned President and Chief Executive
Officer and Vice President Law/Finance and Secretary of Ladish Co., Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Kerry L. Woody  Kerry L. Woody
 President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Wayne E. Larsen  Wayne E. Larsen
Vice President Law/Finance & Secretary

October 24, 2005
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.5620 Automated hemoglobin system. ( a ) *Identification.* An automated hemoglobin system is a fully automated or semi-automated device which may or may not be part of a larger system. The generic type of device consists of the reagents, calibrators, controls, and instrumentation used to determine the hemoglobin content of human blood.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
[45 FR 60601, Sept. 12, 1980]
# C_2015414EN.01002702.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2015 — Vimeo v OHIM — PT Comunicações (VIMEO)

(Case T-96/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark VIMEO - Earlier Community figurative mark meo - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No coexistence of the marks - Likelihood of confusion))

(2015/C 414/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vimeo LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: A. Poulter and M. MacDonald, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: PT Comunicações, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2013 (Case R 1092/2013-2), relating to opposition proceedings between PT Comunicações, SA and Vimeo LLC.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vimeo LLC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vimeo LLC to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4795]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 23, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Clarence D. Ballard, Winnsboro, Texas; to acquire voting shares 
of Sulphur Springs Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of The City National Bank of Sulphur Springs, both of 
Sulphur Springs, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 3, 2010.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-4795 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Table of Contents

**As filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on June 27, 2003**
**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Form 20-F/A**   **o** **REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION    12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934** **OR** **x** **ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**   **for the fiscal year ended December 31,    2002****OR** **o** **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR    15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
**Commission file number 1-14540**

**Deutsche Telekom AG***(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in itsCharter)*
**Germany***(Jurisdiction of Incorporation orOrganization)*
**Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 140, 53113 Bonn,Germany***(Address of Registrant’s PrincipalExecutive Offices)*
Securities registered or to be registeredpursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.   **Title of each class****Name of each exchange on which registered**American Depositary Shares, each representing
§ 26.50 Alert system and exchange of postmarket vigilance reports. ( a ) An alert system will be set up during the transition period and maintained thereafter by which the parties will notify each other when there is an immediate danger to public health. Elements of such a system will be described in an appendix F of this subpart. As part of that system, each party shall notify the other party of any confirmed problem reports, corrective actions, or recalls. These reports are regarded as part of ongoing investigations.
( b ) Contact points will be agreed between both parties to permit authorities to be made aware with the appropriate speed in case of quality defect, batch recalls, counterfeiting and other problems concerning quality, which could necessitate additional controls or suspension of the distribution of the product.
#### § 56.114 Cooperative research.

In complying with these regulations, institutions involved in multi-institutional studies may use joint review, reliance upon the review of another qualified IRB, or similar arrangements aimed at avoidance of duplication of effort.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 725 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 725

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 15, 2006.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4939) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. When the 
reading for amendment reaches title II, such title shall be considered as read. 
During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of 
the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. When the committee rises and 
reports the bill back to the House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, 
the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```