alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3910 Backing and facing for an artificial tooth. ( a ) *Identification.* A backing and facing for an artificial tooth is a device intended for use in fabrication of a fixed or removable dental appliance, such as a crown or bridge. The backing, which is made of gold, is attached to the dental appliance and supports the tooth-colored facing, which is made of porcelain or plastic.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 63008, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38799, July 25, 2001]
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 99


March 29, 2002

Office of the Chief Accountant
Division of Corporation Finance
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0410

Dear Sir or Madam:

Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to Seven Seas Petroleum Inc. that its audit
was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards and that there was
appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability
of national office consultation and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Sincerely,

Seven Seas Petroleum Inc.



By
     Ronald A. Lefaive
     Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
# C_2015320EN.01002702.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/27

---

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2015 — Pro Asyl v EASO

(Case T-617/14) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Operational Plan for the deployment of an asylum support team in the territory of Bulgaria - Refusal of access - No need to adjudicate - Action for annulment - Electronic document register - Partial manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 320/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pro Asyl Bundesweite Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Flüchtlinge eV (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: S. Hilbrans, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (represented by: L. Cerdán Ortiz-Quintana, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of letter EASO/ED/2014/134 of the EASO of 10 June 2014.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it seeks the annulment of letter EASO/ED/2014/134 of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) of 10 June 2014 refusing access to the operational plan to deploy the European Union support team in Bulgaria. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it seeks the annulment of letter EASO/ED/2014/134 of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) of 10 June 2014 refusing access to the operational plan to deploy the European Union support team in Bulgaria.

| 2. | The remainder of the action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The remainder of the action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 3. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 409, 17.11.2014.

1

---
|   |  1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  |  December      2, 2009 |   | By:    |  /s/      Edward P. Smolyansky                                                                                 |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                        |   |   |  Edward      P. Smolyansky Chief      Financial  and Accounting Officer      and Treasurer |   |

----
§ 501.15 Animal food; prominence of required statements. ( a ) A word, statement, or other information required by or under authority of the act to appear on the label may lack that prominence and conspicuousness required by section 403(f) of the act by reason (among other reasons) of: ( 1 ) The failure of such word, statement, or information to appear on the part or panel of the label which is presented or displayed under customary conditions of purchase;
( 2 ) The failure of such word, statement, or information to appear on two or more parts or panels of the label, each of which has sufficient space therefor, and each of which is so designed as to render it likely to be, under customary conditions of purchase, the part or panel displayed;
( 3 ) The failure of the label to extend over the area of the container or package available for such extension, so as to provide sufficient label space for the prominent placing of such word, statement, or information;
( 4 ) Insufficiency of label space (for the prominent placing of such word, statement, or information) resulting from the use of label space for any word, statement, design, or device which is not required by or under authority of the act to appear on the label;
( 5 ) Insufficiency of label space (for the prominent placing of such word, statement, or information) resulting from the use of label space to give materially greater conspicuousness to any other word, statement, or information, or to any design or device; or
( 6 ) Smallness or style of type in which such word, statement, or information appears, insufficient background contrast, obscuring designs or vignettes, or crowding with other written, printed, or graphic matter.
( b ) No exemption depending on insufficiency of label space, as prescribed in regulations promulgated under section 403(e) or (i) of the act, shall apply if such insufficiency is caused by: ( 1 ) The use of label space for any word, statement, design, or device which is not required by or under authority of the act to appear on the label;
( 2 ) The use of label space to give greater conspicuousness to any word, statement, or other information that is required by section 403(f) of the act; or
( 3 ) The use of label space for any representation in a foreign language.
( c ) ( 1 ) All words, statements, and other information required by or under authority of the act to appear on the label or labeling shall appear thereon in the English language: *Provided, however,* That in the case of articles distributed solely in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or in a territory where the predominant language is one other than English, the predominant language may be substituted for English.
( 2 ) If the label contains any representation in a foreign language, all words, statements, and other information required by or under authority of the act to appear on the label shall appear thereon in the foreign language.
( 3 ) If any article of labeling (other than a label) contains any representation in a foreign language, all words, statements, and other information required by or under authority of the act to appear on the label or labeling shall appear on such article of labeling.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 19, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00717

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF MARIA L. RAYNES

,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PC

- 0369

Honorable Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Transfer Reporter ’ s Record is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000814077
<NAME> ASSOCIATED PLANNERS REALTY GROWTH FUND
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,384
<PP&E>                                         311,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,930)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 270,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,463
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (166,131)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   270,332
<SALES>                                        168,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               855,102
<CGS>                                          161,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  161,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                633,927
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   633,927
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   304.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   304.51
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

The active subsidiaries of Day International Group, Inc. are listed below, do
business under the name under which they are organized, and are included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company. The names, jurisdiction of
incorporation of such subsidiaries, and percentage of voting securities owned by
the Company are set forth below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               Jurisdiction in      Percentage of Voting
 Name of subsidiary          which Incorporated     Securities owned
 ------------------          ------------------     --------------------
<S>                         <C>                      <C>
Day International, Inc.            Delaware          100%
Day Holdings I, Inc.               Delaware          100%(1)
Day Holdings II, Inc.              Delaware          100%(1)
Day International (U.K.)        United Kingdom       100%(3)
 Holdings Limited
Day International (U.K.),       United Kingdom       100%(2)
 Ltd.
Day International (Canada)      Ontario, Canada      100%(1)
 Holdings Limited
Day International                  France            100%(1)
 France S.A.R.L
Day International                  Germany           100%(1)
 (BRD) Gmbh
Day International de Mexico        Mexico            100%(1)
  S.A. de C.V.
</TABLE>

(1)     Subsidiaries of Day International, Inc.
(2)     Subsidiary of Day International (U.K.) Holdings Limited
(3)     Subsidiary of Day Holdings I, Inc. and Day Holdings II, Inc.

                                       82
#### Radio Corporation of America, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles M. Smith, Doing Business as Charles M. Smith Truck Service, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 68-15.

Fifth District.

April 8, 1969.

William E. Aulgur, of Eldorado, for appellant; Joseph W. Hickman, of Benton, for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE EBERSPACHER.

Not to be published in full.
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC In the Matter of: TRANS NORTH AVIATION, LTD. FAA Order No. 2014-4 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046 1

Served: December 4, 2014 

### ORDER OF DISMISSAL' By notice served on December 1, 2014, Complainant withdrew its complaint in this matter. Subsequently, Trans North Aviation filed a motion to dismiss the proceedings with prejudice, based upon Complainant's withdrawal ofits complaint, the order assessing civil penalty and the final notice ofproposed civil penalty." Complainant has filed a motion in support ofTrans North Aviation's motion to dismiss this action with prejudice. THL'REFORE. ITIS ORDERED THAT. The complaint and the proceedings are dismissed with prejudice. MICHAEL P.I!UERTA, ADMINISTRATOR Pederal Aviation Administration 

## -?**~~**//> 

# cyt:..**y;:£;J_.~~::::~~"-~---,**

# ..__ ,.%{. J**'---~_/1** /" 1**'~,** .,.) VICKI S. LEEMON3**~-** Manager, Adjudication Branch
1 Generally, materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket are also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov. 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(l). 2 The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes ofthe decisions, the rules of practice, and other information, are available on the Internet at the following address: www.faa.gov/abuut/ojfice
__orglheadquarters
..C<fficeslagc/pol_adjudication/AGC 400/Civil _Penalty/. See 14 C.P.R.§ 13.210(e)(2). In addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw (FTRANFAA database). For additional information, see the Web site.

1 Issued under authority delegated to the ChiefCounsel and the Assistant ChiefCounsel for Litigation by memorandum dated October 27, !992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. § 13.202 (see 57 Fed. Reg. 58.280 ( 1992)) and redelegated by the Assistant ChiefCounsel for Litigation to the Manager, Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
| (logo) ncb

National Cooperative Bank | 2011 Crystal Drive

Suite, 800

Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February 29, 2016

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: AJ Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE:      Annual Statement as to Compliance WFCM 2015 C30

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C30, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A., formerly NCB, FSB (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a. A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b. To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover on or before March 31, 2016.

 

 

Best regards,

 

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
# C_2015026EN.01003401.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/34

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 November 2014 — SEA v Commission

(Case T-674/14 R)

((Application for interim measures - State aid - Obligation to recover aid granted by the public operator of an airport to a subsidiary management company - Liquidation of the company - Creation of a new management company - Commission decision to initiate a formal State aid investigation procedure in order to assess the existence of any economic continuity between the two companies - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Manifest inadmissibility of the main application - Inadmissibility - Lack of urgency))

(2015/C 026/43)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Società per azioni esercizi aeroportuali (SEA) (Segrate, Italy) (represented by: F. Gatti, J.-F. Bellis, F. Di Gianni and A. Scalini, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and G. Conte, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, in essence, the suspension of European Commission Decision C(2014) 4537 final of 9 July 2014 to initiate a formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU concerning the establishment of the company Airport Handling [SA.21420 (2014/NN) — Italy — Establishment of Airport Handling].

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2023063EN.01003001.xml

| 20.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings v Commission

(Case T-586/14 RENV II) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of solar glass originating in China - Article 2(8) to (10) and Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(8) to (10) and Articles 19 and 20 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Right to access confidential documents - Manifest error of assessment - Rights of the defence)

(2023/C 63/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd (Anhui, China) (represented by: Y. Melin and B. Vigneron, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH (Tschernitz, Germany) (represented by: R. MacLean, Solicitor)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 470/2014 of 13 May 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2014 L 142, p. 1, corrigendum OJ 2014 L 253, p. 4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 372, 20.10.2014.

---
§ 801.127 Medical devices; expiration of exemptions. ( a ) If a shipment or delivery, or any part thereof, of a device which is exempt under the regulations in this section is made to a person in whose possession the article is not exempt, or is made for any purpose other than those specified, such exemption shall expire, with respect to such shipment or delivery or part thereof, at the beginning of that shipment or delivery. The causing of an exemption to expire shall be considered an act which results in such device being misbranded unless it is disposed of under circumstances in which it ceases to be a drug or device.
( b ) The exemptions conferred by §§ 801.119, 801.122, and 801.125 shall continue until the devices are used for the purposes for which they are exempted, or until they are relabeled to comply with section 502(f)(1) of the act. If, however, the device is converted, or manufactured into a form limited to prescription dispensing, no exemption shall thereafter apply to the article unless the device is labeled as required by § 801.109.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7726 

To amend chapter 77 of title 5, United States Code, to clarify certain 

due process rights of Federal employees serving in sensitive positions, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 19, 2024 

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. CARSON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 77 of title 5, United States Code, to 

clarify certain due process rights of Federal employees 

serving in sensitive positions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS. 

4 Section 7701 of title 5, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (k) as sub7 section (l); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (j) the fol9 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7726 IH

1 ‘‘(k)(1) An employee or applicant for employment ap2 pealing an action arising from a determination of ineligi3 bility for a sensitive position may not be denied Board re4 view of the merits of such determination if— 

5 ‘‘(A) the position is not one that requires a se6 curity clearance or access to classified information; 

7 and 

8 ‘‘(B) such action is otherwise appealable. 

9 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘sen10 sitive position’ means any position so designated pursuant 

11 to Executive Order 10450 (5 U.S.C. 7311 note) or, if su12 perseded, a successor Executive order.’’. 

13 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

14 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to all 

15 appeals, without exception, that are pending on, or com16 menced on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 99(a)


         Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350


     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Ladish Co., Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/  Kerry L. Woody
---------------------------------------
Kerry L. Woody
October 31, 2002