alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           507,319
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,118,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,743,741
<PP&E>                                            <blank>
<DEPRECIATION>                                    <blank>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    <blank>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,177,205
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          12,696
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,132,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,372,653
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 557,811
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    399,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,936,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               222,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (7,000,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       2,853
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (7,002,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (7,002,465)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.64)



</TABLE>
================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549
                                    --------

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                                 Date of Report

                                 August 4, 2003

                              ULTRA PETROLEUM CORP.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

    Yukon Territory, Canada              0-29370                    N/A
(State or other jurisdiction of (Commission File Number)     (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)                            Identification Number)

                     (363 N Sam Houston Pkwy E., suite 1200
                               Houston, TX 77060)

                                 (281-876-0120)

================================================================================

<PAGE>

Item 12. Results of Operations and Financial Condition


                                                                               2

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

[August 4th, 2003]                                 By: David Russell
                                                       -------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3670 Resin impression tray material. ( a ) *Identification.* Resin impression tray material is a device intended for use in a two-step dental mold fabricating process. The device consists of a resin material, such as methyl methacrylate, and is used to form a custom impression tray for use in cases in which a preformed impression tray is not suitable, such as the fabrication of crowns, bridges, or full dentures. A preliminary plaster or stone model of the patient's teeth and gums is made. The resin impression tray material is applied to this preliminary study model to form a custom tray. This tray is then filled with impression material and inserted into the patient's mouth to make an impression, from which a final, more precise, model of the patient's mouth is cast.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9. If the device is not labeled or otherwise represented as sterile, it is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 63008, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38798, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.4730 Dental injecting needle. ( a ) *Identification.* A dental injecting needle is a slender, hollow metal device with a sharp point intended to be attached to a syringe to inject local anesthetics and other drugs.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 63008, Dec. 7, 1994; 66 FR 38799, July 25, 2001]
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AXS-One Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the year ended December  31,  2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

|  |          |                                                                                                                       |
|--|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                               |  |  |              |  |  |                                                                             |
|-----------------------------------------------|--|--|--------------|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  | AXS-ONE INC. |
| Date:    March  23,  2007 |  |  | By:          |  |  | /s/ William P. Lyons                                                        |
|                                          |  |  |         |  |  | William P. Lyons Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer          |
|                                          |  |  | By:          |  |  | /s/ Joseph Dwyer                                                            |
|                                          |  |  |         |  |  | Joseph DwyerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,and Treasurer |
|                                               |

----
§ 822.1 What does this part cover? This part implements section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by providing procedures and requirements for postmarket surveillance of class II and class III devices that meet any of the following criteria: ( a ) Failure of the device would be reasonably likely to have serious adverse health consequences;
( b ) The device is intended to be implanted in the human body for more than 1 year;
( c ) The device is intended to be used outside a user facility to support or sustain life. If you fail to comply with requirements that we order under section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and this part, your device is considered misbranded under section 502(t)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and you are in violation of section 301(q)(1)(C) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or
( d ) The device is expected to have significant use in pediatric populations.
[67 FR 38887, June 6, 2002, as amended at 88 FR 16880, Mar. 21, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000814576
<NAME>  PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                       6,998
<SECURITIES>                                             2,802,692
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,223,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             3,067
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           4,036,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       47,862
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               3,988,629
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             4,036,491
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          (201,368)
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            45,016
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (246,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (246,384)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-31448

Summary Calendar

 

MACK HENRY RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-1499

__________________________________________

June 22, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mack Henry Richardson appeals the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of

his civil lawsuit against the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 925A and 5 U.S.C. § 522a(g)(1)(C), arising out of his inability to reacquire firearms as a result of

his 1973 felony conviction. Richardson argues that he was improperly denied the right to acquire

weapons because the Louisiana Constitution restored his civilrights. He also argues that the district

court erred in determining that the FBI was exempt from suit under the Privacy Act.
2

Having conducted a de novo review, (see Jackson v. CityofBeaumont Police Dep’t, 958 F.2d

616, 618 (5th Cir. 1992)), we conclude that for substantially the same reasons articulated by the

district court in its dismissal order, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1986-D,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement  of  operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,695
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,284
<PP&E>                                         12,818,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,353,298)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,605,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,233
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,459,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,605,394
<SALES>                                        96,397
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               98,726
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  93,577<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (47,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (47,361)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (47,361)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### Jean Baron *v.*Joseph W. Baron

*E. Stanton Kennedy,*for the appellee (defendant).

No appearance for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued December 3

decided December 3, 1968

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000814576
<NAME>  PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS II, L.P.

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                      6,998
<SECURITIES>                                            4,379,080
<RECEIVABLES>                                           6,264,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       10,656,286
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         10,656,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     163,741
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                             10,492,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           10,656,286
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        9,463,528
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          165,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         9,298,526
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            9,298,526
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0


</TABLE>
### Groundwater quality from private domestic water-supply wells in the vicinity of petroleum production in southwestern Indiana

By: Martin R. Risch**Cheryl A. Silcox

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161081

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (791 kB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Appendix:  **Appendix Tables**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

First posted June 2, 2016

**For additional information, contact:**
Director, Indiana Water Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 5957 Lakeside Boulevard Indianapolis, IN 46278–1996

http://in.water.usgs.gov/

The U.S. Geological Survey provided technical support to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry for site selection and sample collection and analysis in a 2012 investigation of groundwater quality from 29 private domestic water-supply wells in the vicinity of petroleum production in southwestern Indiana. Petroleum hydrocarbons, oil and grease, aromatic volatile organic compounds, methane concentrations greater than 8,800 micrograms per liter, chloride concentrations greater than 250 milligrams per liter, and gross alpha radioactivity greater than 15 picocuries per liter were reported in the analysis of groundwater samples from 11 wells.

#### Suggested Citation

Risch, M.R., and Silcox, C.A., 2016, Groundwater quality from private domestic water-supply wells in the vicinity of petroleum production in southwestern Indiana: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016–1081, 29 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161081.

ISSN: 2331-1258 (online)

#### Study Area

#### Table of Contents

- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Groundwater Quality in Private Domestic Water-Supply Wells
- Summary
- References
- Appendix 1

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2015118EN.01002802.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 February 2015 — Walton v Commission

(Case T-261/14 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Temporary staff - Action at first instance dismissed as manifestly inadmissible - Resignation from a post as a member of the temporary staff - Amount of the debt owed by applicant to the Commission following his resignation - Authority of res judicata - Decisions which have become final in the absence of legal action))

(2015/C 118/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Robert Walton (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and A.-C. Simon, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2014 in Walton v Commission (F-32/13, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:37), and seeking that that order be set aside.

Walton

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Declares that Mr Robert Walton is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay those incurred by the European Commission in connection with the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Mr Robert Walton is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay those incurred by the European Commission in connection with the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 235, 21.7.2014.

1

---