alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31.2

     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF RICHARD DEA

              RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Dea, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of InZon
Corporation (formerly W-J International, Ltd.);

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: February 11, 2005               By: /s/ Richard Dea
                                       Richard Dea, Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smart-tek Solutions,
Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10KT/A Amendment No. 1 for the six month period
ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Bonar, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigneds
knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Brian BonarBrian Bonar Chief Financial
Officer

August 1, 2011

---
# C_2015155EN.01004001.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/40

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2015 — TechnoCompound v Commission

(Case T-307/14) (1)

1

(2015/C 155/55)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 15.1

LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Board of Directors and Shareholders

STERIS Corporation

We are aware of the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements and related Prospectuses of our report dated February 5, 2009 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of STERIS Corporation and subsidiaries that are included in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008:



|                    |  |                                                                                                                      
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Registration Number |  | Description                                                                                                          
|333-137167          |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan                                      
|                    | 
|333-136239          |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 2006 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan                            
|                    | 
|333-65155           |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan                      
|                    | 
|333-32005           |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan                                          
|                    | 
|333-06529           |  | Form S-3 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation                                                                 
|                    | 
|333-01610           |  | Post-effective Amendment to Form S-4 on Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation                         
|                    | 
|33-91444            |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 1994 Equity Compensation Plan                                   
|                    | 
|33-91442            |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 1994 Nonemployee Directors Equity Compensation Plan             
|                    | 
|33-55976            |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 401(k) Plan                                                     
|                    | 
|333-09733           |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 401(k) Plan                                                     
|                    | 
|333-101308          |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 2002 Stock Option Plan                                          
|                    | 
|333-91302           |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between STERIS Corporation and Mark D. McGinley

/S/    ERNST &
YOUNG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

February 5,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         155,761
<SECURITIES>                                    17,080
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,014,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,075,374
<INVENTORY>                                    582,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,740,959
<PP&E>                                       2,271,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 678,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,463,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,379,858
<BONDS>                                      7,911,176
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,923
<PREFERRED>                                    739,696
<COMMON>                                    21,016,932
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,612,954)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,463,631
<SALES>                                      8,173,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,204,391
<CGS>                                        6,115,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,318,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             526,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,640,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,640,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,640,812)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 23



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 33-58799) pertaining to the Penford Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan
and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8,
No. 33-88946) pertaining to the Penford Corporation Savings and Stock Ownership
Plan of our report dated October 9, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Penford Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended August 31, 1998.





Seattle, Washington
November 20, 1998                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP
```

[Federal Register: August 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 161)]
[Notices]               
[Page 51518]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20au10-100]                         

[[Page 51518]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7126]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Ballplayers, Gods, and Rainmaker Kings: Masterpieces 
From Ancient Mexico''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Ballplayers, Gods, and Rainmaker Kings: 
Masterpieces from Ancient Mexico,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, 
Illinois, from on or about September 15, 2010, until on or about 
January 2, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 16, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-20711 Filed 8-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2017038EN.01002402.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2016 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-466/14) (1)

1

((Customs Union - Importation of tuna products from El Salvador - Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties - Application for non-recovery of import duties - Article 220(2)(b) and Article 236 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Right to good administration under Article 872a of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Error of the competent authorities not reasonably capable of being detected))

(2017/C 038/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by A. Rubio González, and subsequently by V. Ester Casas, abogados del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Arenas, A. Caeiros and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2363 final of 14 April 2014 which found, in a particular case, that the remission of import duties is justified for a certain amount, but not for another amount (REM 02/2013), inasmuch as it concludes that the remission of the import duties of EUR 14 417 193,41 is not justified.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.5020 Nonabsorbable polyamide surgical suture. ( a ) *Identification.* Nonabsorbable polyamide surgical suture is a nonabsorbable, sterile, flexible thread prepared from long-chain aliphatic polymers Nylon 6 and Nylon 6,6 and is indicated for use in soft tissue approximation. The polyamide surgical suture meets United States Pharmacopeia (U.S.P.) requirements as described in the U.S.P. monograph for nonabsorbable surgical sutures; it may be monofilament or multifilament in form; it may be provided uncoated or coated; and it may be undyed or dyed with an appropriate FDA listed color additive. Also, the suture may be provided with or without a standard needle attached.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is FDA's “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Surgical Sutures; Guidance for Industry and FDA.” See § 878.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.
[56 FR 24685, May 31, 1991, as amended at 68 FR 32985, June 3, 2003]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

72 

KA 15-00995 

PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARK D. ABBOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL J.

PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P.

Franczyk, J.), rendered September 15, 2014. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, as a

class E felony. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle

and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [i] [A]). Even assuming,

arguendo, that defendant did not knowingly and voluntarily waive the

right to appeal the severity of the sentence (see generally People v

Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928), we reject defendant’s contention that the

sentence is unduly harsh and severe. 

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# C_2014282EN.01003801.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/38

---

Action brought on 17 April 2014 — The Smiley Company v OHIM (Shape of a face)

(Case T-243/14)

2014/C 282/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Smiley Company SPRL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Freitag, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 January 2014 given in Case R 837/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 January 2014 given in Case R 837/2013-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Tri-dimensional mark representing the shape of a face for goods in classes 29 and 30 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 1 68  861

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Found the mark applied for not eligible for registration pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) of the Regulation No 207/2009

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of the Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2019082EN.01002601.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — Lupin v Commission

(Case T-680/14) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for perindopril, a medicinal product intended for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, in its originator and generic versions - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Patent dispute settlement agreement - Technology acquisition agreement - Restriction of competition by object - Balance between competition law and patent law - Fines))

(2019/C 82/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lupin Ltd (Maharashtra, India) (represented initially by M. Pullen, R. Fawcett-Feuillette, Solicitors, M. Hoskins QC, V. Wakefield, Barrister and M. Boles, Solicitor, and subsequently by M. Hoskins, V. Wakefield, M. Boles, K. Vernon and S. Smith, Solicitors, and lastly by M. Hoskins, V. Wakefield, S. Smith and C. Wall, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by F. Castilla Contreras, B. Mongin and T. Vecchi, and subsequently by F. Castilla Contreras, B. Mongin and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents, and by B. Rayment, Barrister)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 4955 final of 9 July 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 and Article 102 TFEU [Case AT.39612 — Perindopril (Servier)] in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Lupin Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lupin Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 439, 8.12.2014.

---
# C_2014061EN.01002201.xml

| 1.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/22

---

Action brought on 9 January 2014 — ZZ and ZZ v Court of Auditors

(Case F-2/14)

2014/C 61/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Court of Auditors

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors not to examine the action to be taken following the complaint made by the applicants against two of their colleagues as a result of their joint malicious statement and to consider that it was not necessary to take measures which were required under its duty to provide assistance.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 13 December 2012 of the Court of Auditors to close the applicants’ file concerning their request under Article 24 without taking any action against two of their colleagues; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 13 December 2012 of the Court of Auditors to close the applicants’ file concerning their request under Article 24 without taking any action against two of their colleagues;

| — | order the Court of Auditors to pay the applicants, for non-material damage, provisionally EUR 1 towards damage assessed at EUR 100 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Auditors to pay the applicants, for non-material damage, provisionally EUR 1 towards damage assessed at EUR 100 000;

| — | order the Court of Auditors to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Auditors to pay the costs.

---
# C_2016270EN.01004001.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2016 — Fútbol Club Barcelona v EUIPO — Kule (KULE)

(Case T-614/14) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union word mark KULE - Earlier national word marks and well-known mark CULE - Relative grounds for refusal - No genuine use of the earlier trade marks - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 270/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fútbol Club Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Zajfert and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Kule LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: F. Rodgers, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 June 2014 (Case R 2375/2013-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Fútbol Club Barcelona and Kule.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fútbol Club Barcelona to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fútbol Club Barcelona to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 351, 6.10.2014.

1

---