alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4960 Operating tables and accessories and operating chairs and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* Operating tables and accessories and operating chairs and accessories are AC-powered or air-powered devices, usually with movable components, intended for use during diagnostic examinations or surgical procedures to support and position a patient.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 878.9.
[55 FR 48440, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 65 FR 2318, Jan. 14, 2000]
# C_2014261EN.01004601.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/46

---

Action brought on 25 June 2014 — Ibercaja Banco and Others v Commission

(Case T-471/14)

2014/C 261/73

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Ibercaja Banco, SA (Zaragoza, Spain); Banco Grupo Cajatres SA (Zaragoza); and Naviera Bósforo, AIE (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid;

| — | annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.

Bankia

Commission

---
#### Michael Griffith, a Minor, by William Griffith, His Father and Next Friend, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Village of Dolton, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 52,749.

First District, First Division.

March 10, 1969.

*123Quintín B. San Hamel, Pretzel, Stouffer, Nolan & Rooney, of Chicago (Joseph B. Lederleitner, of counsel), for appellant; Griffin & Gallagher, of Chicago (Daniel A. Gallagher, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE BURMAN.

Not to be published in full.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          27,803
<SECURITIES>                                     4,971
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,895
<INVENTORY>                                    160,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,724
<PP&E>                                          11,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 332,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          232,391
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   332,274
<SALES>                                        325,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325,319
<CGS>                                          283,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   398
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,971
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,665
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4685]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION

[USARC 10-018]


92nd Meeting

February 16, 2010.
    Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission 
will hold its 92nd meeting in Miami, FL, on March 15, 2010. The 
business session, open to the public, will convene at 8:30 a.m.
    The Agenda items include:
    (1) Call to order and approval of the agenda.
    (2) Approval of the minutes from the 91st meeting.
    (3) Commissioners and staff reports.
    (4) Discussion and presentations concerning Arctic research 
activities.
    The focus of the meeting will be reports and updates on programs 
and research projects affecting the Arctic.
    Any person planning to attend this meeting, who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission of those needs in advance of 
the meeting.
    Contact person for further information: John Farrell, Executive 
Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-
0090.

John Farrell,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-4685 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Exhibit 12

                     GE GLOBAL INSURANCE HOLDING CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                                         Year ended December 31,
                                               --------------------------------------------
(In millions)                                   2000       1999     1998     1997     1996
                                               --------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>        <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>

Earnings:
   Earnings before income taxes                 $605     $  988   $1,070   $  882     $780
   Fixed charges:
      Minority interest in net earnings of
         consolidated subsidiaries (1)            88         88       85       83       84
     Interest expense (2)                        136        112       61       47       47
                                                ----     ------   ------   ------     ----
                                                $829     $1,188   $1,216   $1,012     $911
                                                ====     ======   ======   ======     ====

Fixed charges:
   Minority interest in net earnings of
      consolidated subsidiaries (3)             $ 92       $121     $117     $113     $110
   Interest expense (2)                          136        112       61       47       47
                                                ----       ----     ----     ----     ----
                                                $228       $233     $178     $160     $157
                                                ====       ====     ====     ====     ====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              3.64       5.10     6.83     6.33     5.80
                                                ====       ====     ====     ====     ====
</TABLE>

(1)  Minority  interest in net earnings of  consolidated  subsidiaries  includes
     earnings from purchased affiliates and dividends on subsidiary's  preferred
     stock.

(2)  Interest  expense  includes an amount for  one-third  of the annual  rental
     expense, which the Company  believes is a reasonable  approximation  of the
     interest factor for such rentals.

(3)  The  fixed  charges  amounts  for  minority  interest  in net  earnings  of
     consolidated subsidiaries represent the pretax earnings amounts which would
     be required to cover such fixed charges as calculated below:

                      Earnings From Purchased Affiliates or
                Subsidiary's Preferred Stock Dividend Requirement
                -------------------------------------------------
                             100% - Income Tax Rate

     The  income  tax rate is based on the  relationship  of the  provision  for
     income taxes to earnings before income taxes for the respective period.


                                       62
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q 

(Mark One)

(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010

or

( )   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number        033-14852-01
AMERICAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2265

DAVID E. HARMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA94-2390-DKC) Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David E. Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Joseph Flaherty, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, McLean, Virginia; Michael Patrick McQuillen, MANOR CARE, INCORPORATED, Gaithersburg, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David E. Harmon appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant on Harmon's claim for disability benefits from his employer. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harmon v. Hewlett-Packard, Inc. , No. CA-94-2390-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 5, 1996). Additionally, Harmon urges this court to consider evidence and issues not raised before the Claims Administrator or the district court. Because these claims were not raised below, we decline to hear them for the first time on appeal. See Quesinberry v. Life Ins. Co. , 987 F.2d 1017, 1025 (4th Cir. 1993) (decision to admitevidence not before the plan administrator depends on the applicable standard of review and lies in the discretion of the district court). Therefore, we deny Harmon's pending motions to supplement the record. We grant Michael McQuillen's motion to withdraw as counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
ViroPharma Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    VINCENT J.
MILANO             
|Vincent J. Milano                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|February 24, 2010                    



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/    CHARLES A. ROWLAND,
JR.
|Charles A. Rowland, Jr.       
|Chief Financial Officer       
|February 24, 2010             





|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 6/2/2015 **FROM:** Angela Hackel; OAR **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR –2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Docketing o f Materials **SUMMARY :**  O n 6/2 /201 5 the EPA held a call with EJ stakeholders to discuss the Clean Power Plan. **ATTENDEES:** EPA - Angela Hackel - Kevin Culligan - Laura McKelvey Mid - West EJ Network

- Cecilia Martinez - La Kimmy Wasserman - Shalini Gupta - William Copeland - Juliana Pino -Nickey Sheets
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6920 Syringe needle introducer. ( a ) *Identification.* A syringe needle introducer is a device that uses a spring-loaded mechanism to drive a hypodermic needle into a patient to a predetermined depth below the skin surface.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

LON VANDUSEN HUGHES,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2907 Disciplinary Docket No.3

No. 128 DB 2021

Attorney Registration No. 320408

(Lancaster County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2022, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Lon VanDusen Hughes is suspended from 

the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day. Respondent shall 

comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. 

See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
From: Sagar Chitre

To: Goehl, Eric

Cc: George Salinas

Subject: RE: BTB Refining, LLC-Area Source of HAPS

Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:52:30 PM

Dear Mr. Goehl,

As per our telephonic conversation today afternoon, I wish to confirm that BTB Refining, L.L.C. is

not a major source of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP). BTB Refining, L.L.C. is an area source of HAP.

If you need more information or have any questions in this regard, please feel free to contact me at

(361) 939-5128.

Sincerely,

Sagar Chitre

Environmental Specialist

BTB Refining, L.L.C.
# C_2016419EN.01003701.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2016 — European Children's Fashion Association and Instituto de Economía Pública v EACEA

(Case T-724/14) (1)

1

((Arbitration clause - Grant agreement concluded under the action programme ‘Lifelong Learning (2007-2013)’ - ‘Brand & Merchandising manager for SMEs in the childrens’ product sector’ project - Action for annulment - Act not subject to appeal - Act forming part of a purely contractual agreement from which it is indissociable - Inadmissibility - Ineligible expenditure - Reimbursement of the sums paid - Audit report))

(2016/C 419/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Children’s Fashion Association (Valencia, Spain) and Instituto de Economía Pública (Valencia) (represented by: A. Haegeman, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet and A. Jaume, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Primarily, application, pursuant to Article 272 TFEU, seeking a declaration that the first application is not required to reimburse the sum paid to it by EACEA under the agreement for the execution of the ‘Brand & Merchandising Manager for SMEs in the Children’s Product Sector’ project, or, in the alternative, application for annulment, firstly, of EACEA’s pre-information letter of 1 August 2014 informing the first applicant that it had to reimburse the sum of EUR 82 378,81 following the audit of the that project and, secondly, of debit note No 3241401420, issued by EACEA on 5 August 2014, seeking the reimbursement of that sum.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders European Children’s Fashion Association and Instituto de Economía Pública to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders European Children’s Fashion Association and Instituto de Economía Pública to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated May 2, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-216424) of Smart Trust 316, comprising
Smart Trust, Healthcare Innovations Trust, Series 3.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


May 2, 2017
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.1070 Calcium carbonate. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive calcium carbonate is a fine, white, synthetically prepared powder consisting essentially of precipitated calcium carbonate (CaCO3).
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for drug use made with calcium carbonate may contain only those diluents listed in this subpart as safe and suitable for use in color additive mixtures for coloring drugs.
( b ) *Specifications.* Calcium carbonate shall meet the specifications for precipitated calcium carbonate in the United States Pharmacopeia XX (1980).
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Calcium carbonate may be safely used in amounts consistent with good manudacturing practice to color drugs generally.
( d ) *Labeling requirements.* The label of the color additive and of any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[42 FR 15643, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 49 FR 10089, Mar. 19, 1984]
#### § 524.1600 Nystatin ophthalmic and topical dosage forms.
# C_2014448EN.01002601.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/26

---

Action brought on 7 July 2014 — Pelikan v OHIM — Hachette Filipacchi Presse (be.bag)

(Case T-517/14)

(2014/C 448/34)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (Hannover, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hachette Filipacchi Presse SA (Levallois Perret, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: The word mark ‘be.bag’ — International registration designating the European Union No 1192/2013-1

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2014 in Case R 1192/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in part; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in part;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---