alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.5400 Coagulation instrument. ( a ) *Identification.* A coagulation instrument is an automated or semiautomated device used to determine the onset of clot formation for in vitro coagulation studies.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). A fibrometer or coagulation timer intended for use with a coagulation instrument is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.
[45 FR 60598, Sept. 12, 1980, as amended at 84 FR 71799, Dec. 30, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.7440 Electrophoretic hemoglobin analysis system. ( a ) *Identification.* An electrophoretic hemoglobin analysis system is a device that electrophoretically separates and identifies normal and abnormal hemoglobin types as an aid in the diagnosis of anemia or erythrocytosis (increased total red cell mass) due to a hemoglobin abnormality.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
[45 FR 60620, Sept. 12, 1980]
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The
undersigned, Lance V. Schulz, Chief Financial Officer of Ballantyne Strong, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”).



The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to his knowledge that:



| | 1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                             
| | 2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 2nd day of April, 2018.



|/s/
    LANCE V. SCHULZ                                  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Lance
                                         V. Schulz | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer                              | 



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and will be retained
by Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.3430 Middle ear mold. ( a ) *Identification.* A middle ear mold is a preformed device that is intended to be implanted to reconstruct the middle ear cavity during repair of the tympanic membrane. The device permits an ample air-filled cavity to be maintained in the middle ear and promotes regeneration of the mucous membrane lining of the middle ear cavity. A middle ear mold is made of materials such as polyamide, polytetrafluoroethylene, silicone elastomer, or polyethylene, but does not contain porous polyethylene.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 874.9.
[51 FR 40389, Nov. 6, 1986, as amended at 84 FR 71813, Dec. 30, 2019]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.70



                                                     March 19, 2003

Mr. A. Curts Cooke
93 Bracken Hill Road
Hamburg, NJ 07419

Dear Curts:

         Effective today, March 19, 2003, you are being engaged as Chief
Administrative Officer of Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. ("RUSS"). You will
receive compensation at the rate of $300,000 per annum. You hereby acknowledge
that this is the sole compensation that you will receive from RUSS (other than
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses in accordance with Company policy).



                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Angelica Berrie
                                            -----------------------
                                            Angelica Berrie
                                            Chief Executive Officer



ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


/s/ A. Curts Cooke
-----------------------
A. Curts Cooke
Dated:  March 19, 2003
                      -
• 2 

# Mississipp i Melvi n Mac k Mayo r 

# dd(^- f

TXivt^r-xcdHocy^ Apri l 13 , 201 0 Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division , X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviatio nAnalysi s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n S** " Floor , Roo mW86-47 2 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : EA S Orde r

2010-2-2 9 cr j Dear Mr . DeVany : Th e City o f

Laure l i s i n receip t

o f th e proposal s fromMesab aAirlines , d/b/ aDelt a Airline s an dSovereig nAir , Inc . t o provid e essentia l ai r servic e t o th e citizen s o f th e Laurel-Hattiesbur g region . Currentl y th e City o f

Laure l ha s survive dth e recessio n du e t o th e vita l rol e o f Camp Shelb y a s amobilizatio ncente r for ou r arme dforces . Th e Howar dTechnolog y Park , alon g withJone s County Junio r College , continue s t o attrac t hig htec hjob s t o th e area . Therefore , th e City o f

Laure l propose s acceptanc e o f Mesab aAirline s t o provid e essentia l ai r service . Base do npas t

servic e an dperformanc e t o th e area , seat capacity , hu b locatio n an dmor e connection s for travelers , w e fee l tha t

Mesab ai s abette r

choic e an dwil l continu e t o hel p ou r

community grow . W e appreciat e you r

pas t effort s i n securin g a n essentia l ai r servic e carrie r

an dyou r cooperatio ni n ou r

endeavo r t o maintai n th e highes t

possibl e leve l o f

ai r servic e for

ou r citizens . Sincerely , Mel-mMaclc , Mayo r City o f Laure l P . O . Box 64 7 /

Laurel , M S 3944 1 /

Phon e (601 ) 428-640 1 /

Fa x (601 ) 428-640 3
#### § 710.4 Information requested.

Form FD-2511 requests information on the name and address of the cosmetic product establishment, including post office ZIP code; all business trading names used by the establishment; and the type of business (manufacturer and/or packer). The information requested should be given separately for each establishment as defined in § 700.3(j) of this chapter.

[39 FR 10059, Mar. 15, 1974, as amended at 46 FR 38073, July 24, 1981; 54 FR 39640, Sept. 27, 1989]
# C_2014361EN.01001901.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/19

---

Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council

(Case T-598/14)

2014/C 361/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Almashreq Investment Fund (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet d'Elzius, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s action admissible and well-founded;

| — | in consequence, order the European Union to pay compensation of EUR 10  000 for all the damage suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

in consequence, order the European Union to pay compensation of EUR 10  000 for all the damage suffered by the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-592/14 Makhlouf v Council.

Makhlouf

Council

---
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zarlink Semiconductor Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
J. Brockett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                          PATRICK J. BROCKETT
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Patrick J. Brockett
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          August 12, 2002


                                       25
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JAVARES HALL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-645 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 13, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hardee County; Michael E. Raiden, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of
The Timberland Company (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:



| |  | /s/BRIAN P. MCKEONBrian P. McKeon
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2003

A
signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to The Timberland Company and will be retained by The Timberland Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 15.1

LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Board of
Directors and Shareholders

STERIS Corporation

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and related Prospectuses of our report dated November 3, 2009 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements of STERIS Corporation and subsidiaries that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009:



|                   |  |                                                                                                                      
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|RegistrationNumber |  | Description                                                                                                          
|333-65155          |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan                      
|                   | 
|333-32005          |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan                                          
|                   | 
|333-06529          |  | Form S-3 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation                                                                 
|                   | 
|333-01610          |  | Post-effective Amendment to Form S-4 on Form S-8  STERIS Corporation                                                
|                   | 
|33-91444           |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 1994 Equity Compensation Plan                                   
|                   | 
|33-55976           |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 401(k) Plan                                                     
|                   | 
|333-09733          |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 401(k) Plan                                                     
|                   | 
|333-101308         |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 2002 Stock Option Plan                                          
|                   | 
|333-91302          |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between STERIS Corporation and Mark D. McGinley
|                   | 
|333-137167         |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan                                      
|                   | 
|333-136239         |  | Form S-8 Registration Statement  STERIS Corporation 2006 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan                            

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

November 3, 2009
# C_2014303EN.01003301.xml

| 8.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/33

---

Action brought on 11 June 2014 — Wine in Black v OHIM — Quinta do Noval — Vinhos (Wine in Black)

(Case T-420/14)

2014/C 303/41

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wine in Black GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Bauer and V. Ahmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Quinta do Noval — Vinhos, SA (Pinhão, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Fully set aside the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 March 2014 in Case R 1601/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Fully set aside the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 March 2014 in Case R 1601/2013-1;

| — | Award the costs of the proceedings against the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

Award the costs of the proceedings against the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Wine in Black’ for goods and services in classes 33, 35 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 9 49  071

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Quinta do Noval — Vinhos, SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘NOVAL BLACK’ for goods in class 33

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Art. 8 (1) (b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 1316.12 Refusal to allow inspection with an administrative warrant.

If a registrant or any person subject to the Act refuses to permit execution of an administrative warrant or impedes the inspector in the execution of that warrant, he shall be advised that such refusal or action constitutes a violation of section 402(a)(6) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 842(a)(6)). If he persists and the circumstances warrant, he shall be arrested and the inspection shall commence or continue.

[36 FR 7820, Apr. 24, 1971. Redesignated at 38 FR 26609, Sept. 24, 1973, as amended at 62 FR 13970, Mar. 24, 1997]
JRN-28-2010 11:26

BOBBY JINDAL

GOVERNOR

P.02

HAROLD LEGGETT, PH.D.

SECRETI\RY

JAN 06 201D

~tate of 1Loul£itana

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Mr, Charles Faultry

Associate Director, Superfund Remedial Branch

US Envirorunental Protection Agency, Region 6

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200

Dallas~ TX 75202-2733

Re.: Concurrence to Fina.lize the Final Close Out Report

Ruston Foundry Superfund Site; AI Number (12443)

1010 Bogan Street, Alexandria, Rapides Parish, LA

Dew· Mr. Faultry:

The Louisiana Department of Environmental QualityIRemediation Services Division (LDEQ/RSD)

is in receipt of the Final Close Out Report dated January 2010, Thank you for prOViding this

information.

Based upon our review of your submittal, LDEQ/RSD concurs with the lrlformation found in the

referenced document. As a reSUlt) the Department supports the U. S. Envirorunental Protection

Agency's (EPA) position to finalize the closure procedures for this site.

You may contact Wanda Ballou at (225) 219-3223 with any questions. Please continue to address

any future correspondence with the AI number to: Thomas F, Harris, Administrator;

Remediation Senrices Division; P.O, Box 4314; Baton Rouge, LA 70821·4314.

'rhank you for your support and assistance in addressing this site.

Sincerely>

l~homas F. Harris, Administrator

Remediation Services Division

c; Imaging Operations - lAS

POSt Of6ceBox 4314- Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-4314 • Pl

uru"v"'\,..n 't)"i~j~ ""'~.O'()V

)..219..3236 • Fax 225-21-9-3239

TOTAL P.02

000104
JAN-28-2010 11:26 P.01

FAX TRANSJvfITTAL

Office of Envil"onlnental Assessment

P. O. Box 4314

Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4314

Phone: (225) 219-3236

Fax: (225) 219-3239 DEQ LOUtStANA

Date !ItAf j; 0 Time: ---<1,--,O,---.,-,'0,-,O....Owlh4--_ # Pages to Follow: ~/__

TO: j(aml;q ih3r(~s' !'aH;U'4

Company' /lSEPIi

REGIONAL OFFICES'

_......:Acadiana - Lafayette

. fax: (337) 262-5593

__,Bayou Lafourche - Lockport

fax: (504) 532-9945

__Capital - Baton Rouge

fax: (225) 765-0866

__,Kisatchie . Alexandria

fax: (318) 487-5927

Northeast - Monroe

--'fax. (318) 362-5448

_---'Northwest - Shreveport

fax: (318) 676-7573

_~Southeast- New Orleans

fax: (504)736-7702

__,Southwest - Lake Charles

fax. (337) 491-2682

ALL REGIONS

Commentsllnstructiol1s: p;()~ ( ?(O<L, {)u! fe /lor/- C€hWranU ~ "

FROM: ryl(;/lJa. 13k!lPI4

Phone: I DCC(

Group/Section. £50- 7

000105
# C_2014261EN.01004702.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/47

---

Action brought on 25 June 2014 — Corporación Alimentaria Guissona and Naviera Muriola v Commission

(Case T-473/14)

2014/C 261/75

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Corporación Alimentaria Guissona, SA (Lleida, Spain); and Naviera Muriola, AIE (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid;

| — | annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.

Bankia

Commission

---
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Auditors, Ernst & Young LLP**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 No. 333-13405 and No. 333-81023) pertaining to the Amended andRestated 1995 Equity Participation Plan of Ambassadors International, Inc. ofour report dated February 11, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Ambassadors International, Inc. included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Our audit also included the information as of and for the year ended December31, 2002 included in the financial statement schedule of AmbassadorsInternational, Inc. listed in Item 15(a). This schedule is the responsibilityof the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion basedon our audit. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred toabove, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as awhole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forththerein.
         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Orange County, California
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.2660 Microorganism differentiation and identification device. ( a ) *Identification.* A microorganism differentiation and identification device is a device intended for medical purposes that consists of one or more components, such as differential culture media, biochemical reagents, and paper discs or paper strips impregnated with test reagents, that are usually contained in individual compartments and used to differentiate and identify selected microorganisms. The device aids in the diagnosis of disease.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 65 FR 2311, Jan. 14, 2000]