alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) June 01, 1999

                              THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


    British Columbia, Canada                                    98-0121376
(State or other jurisdiction of           0-18429              (IRS Employer
        incorporation)            (Commission File Number)   Identification No.)


4126 Norland Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia                     V5G 3S8
   (Address of principal executive offices)                       (zip code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code      604-299-9321


                                       N/A
          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




                                                      Exhibit Index is on page 3
                                                                     Page 1 of 5


<PAGE>   2
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

Pursuant to Form 8-K, General Instructions F, registrant hereby incorporates by
reference the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.


ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

        Exhibit No.   Description
        -----------   -----------

        Exhibit 99    The Loewen Group Inc. Press Release dated June 01, 1999


                                   SIGNATURES

               Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: June 03, 1999

                                      THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.



                                      By:  /s/  BRADLEY D. STAM
                                         -------------------------------------
                                      Name:     Bradley D. Stam
                                      Title:    Senior Vice President, Law


<PAGE>   3
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Sequential
Number         Exhibit                                             Page Number
------         -------                                             -----------
<S>            <C>                                                 <C>
99             The Loewen Group Inc.                                    4
               Press Release dated June 01, 1999
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) AS OF AUGUST 1, 1999 AND NOVEMBER 1,
1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE QUARTERS
ENDED AUGUST 1, 1999 AND AUGUST 1, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          62,042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  239,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,952
<INVENTORY>                                    461,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               757,431
<PP&E>                                         213,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                 114,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 884,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          718,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           208
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   884,148
<SALES>                                      1,514,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,514,480
<CGS>                                        1,415,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,415,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,918
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,471)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,170)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,170)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' AWARENESS LETTER

May 13, 1997

To the Board of Directors
of Essef Corporation
220 Park Drive
Chardon, Ohio

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Essef Corporation and Subsidiaries for the periods ended March
31, 1997 and 1996, as indicated in our report dated April 22, 1997; because we
did not do an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-17758 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
Exhibit 4.1

                              DIRECTORS RESOLUTION
                              VALIDIAN CORPORATION
                                  MAY 30, 2003

The Board of Directors of Validian Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("the
Corporation"), acting in accordance with the provisions of Section 78.315 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Nevada, by the signature and with the
consent of the undersigned, who constitute the only member of the Board of
Directors of the Corporation, hereby takes the following actions in lieu of
meeting.

RESOLVED: that the Corporation cancel, effective May 30, 2003 and pursuant to
its agreement with each of the warrant holders, 410,000 Series B warrants
exercisable at $3.00 per share and expiring on December 31st, 2004 and all of
the Series D warrants exercisable at $1.00 per share and expiring on December
31st, 2004.

RESOLVED: that the company issue 2,853,350 shares of its common stock in
satisfaction of $941,605.62 of outstanding 12% secured notes payable including
accrued interest and 1,653,512 shares of its common stock in satisfaction of
$515,958.90 of outstanding 5% convertible notes payable including accrued
interest and that the company also issue 2,135,000 Series E Warrants with an
exercise price of $0.33 per share and expiring on May 30, 2008 and 4,000,000
Series F Warrants with an exercise price of $0.50 per share and expiring on May
30, 2007.

RESOLVED: that the company's Incentive Equity Plan is hereby approved.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director of Validian Corporation has
executed this Unanimous Consent effective as of the 30th day of May 2003.

/s/ Andre Maisonneuve
------------------------
Andre Maisonneuve
Director



                                      3
EXHIBIT 32.1SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION     I, Julie Smolyansky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Lifeway Foods, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for three-month period endedJune 30, 2006:     (1) Fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     (2) That the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-QSB. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.Date:May 14, 2007       /s/ Julie Smolyansky     Julie Smolyansky, Chief Executive Officer,    President, and Director
DEFENSE OF FORMER ADJUDICATION BEFORE A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE.

Circuit Court of Cuyahoga County.

#### C. E. Howard v. J. Koblitz & Company.

Decided, May 22, 1912.

*Former Adjudication*— Justice *Judgment Appealed- and Case Dismissed for Want of Prosecution*— No *Bar to Another Action.*

*A*judgment of a justice of the peace appealed to the common pleas court where the case is subsequently dismissed for want of prosecution is no bar to a subsequent action upon the same cause of action or a part thereof.

*J. H. Saltsman,*for plaintiff in error.

*F. C. Scott,*contra.

Niman, J.;'Winch, J., and Marvin, J., concur.

C. E. Howard brought suit against J. Koblitz *&*Company in the court of common pleas to recover damages of said defendants for the alleged conversion of certain wooden pulleys. The defendants filed an answer to the petition, in the second defense of which was set forth a prior recovery upon the same cause of action by the plaintiff against the defendants. The defendants in said second defense alleged, "that in the action before one one John V. Grinley, then a justice of the peace in and for Cleveland township in said county and state, for the same cause of action alleged in the petition in this case, said plaintiff C. E. Howard, recovered a judgment against these defendants. ’ ’

A reply ivas filed to this answer in the following terms:

> “Now comes the plaintiff, and for his reply to the answer of the defendant, says: that an action was brought before Justice Grinley for part of the cause of action alleged in this cause, but further says that same was appealed to the court of common pleas and dismissed for want of prosecution.”

A motion for judgment upon the pleadings was made by .the defendants and granted by the trial court.. This proceeding in *96error is prosecuted to reverse tbe judgment so rendered in favor of the defendants below on the pleadings.

As the pleadings stood when the motion was heard, it was admitted that the plaintiff had recovered a judgment in the justice court upon a part, at least, of the same cause of action set forth in the petition; that this judgment has been appealed from the court of common pleas and that the cause so appealed had been dismissed for want of prosecution.

The question to be determined here, then is whether the plaintiff in this action is barred from maintaining the same by reason of the recovery in the justice court of a judgment on the same cause of action, which had been appealed from and the appeal dismissed without trial upon the merits.

The precise question involved here was passed-upon by this court March 24, 1911, in the case of *Artino*v. *Leparo*where, on a similar state of facts, it was held that the plaintiff was not barred from maintaining another action on the same claim involved in the former action.

Adhering to the ruling in that case, we hold that the court of common pleas erred in granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings, and the judgment of the court of common pleas is therefore reversed and remanded for further proceedings according to law.
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4820 Surgical instrument motors and accessories/attachments. ( a ) *Identification.* Surgical instrument motors and accessories are AC-powered, battery-powered, or air-powered devices intended for use during surgical procedures to provide power to operate various accessories or attachments to cut hard tissue or bone and soft tissue. Accessories or attachments may include a bur, chisel (osteotome), dermabrasion brush, dermatome, drill bit, hammerhead, pin driver, and saw blade.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 878.9.
[55 FR 48440, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 65 FR 2318, 2000]
# C_2014361EN.01002602.xml

| 13.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/26

---

Action brought on 21 August 2014 — Jaguar Land Rover v OHIM (Shape of a car)

(Case T-629/14)

2014/C 361/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jaguar Land Rover Ltd (Coventry, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Delord and R. Grewal, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 April 2014 given in Case R 1622/2013-2. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 April 2014 given in Case R 1622/2013-2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The 3D mark representing a shape of a car for goods in Classes 12, 14 and 28 — Community trade mark application No. 1 1 3 88  411

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application in part

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) CTMR.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 35.16

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

CGBAM Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-SMRT

The
undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Trustee in its capacity as Custodian (a Certifying Servicer) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 6, 2015 (the
Agreement), by and among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Servicer and Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee
(the Trustee), and Citibank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator, here by certifies in accordance with Section 13.7 of the Agreement:



|A) | A review of such Certifying Servicers activities from May 6, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the reporting period) and of such Certifying Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under
such officers supervision and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|B) | That, as to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICASas Trustee in its capacity as Custodian/s/ David CoBY:

David CoTitle:

DirectorDate:

March 1, 2016
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Arthur Sweeney

*Arthur Sweeney,*pro se, in support of the motion.

Submitted November 12

decided November 20, 1968

The motion by the defendant protesting the filing of the state’s brief in the appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County is denied.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, Special Emphasis Panel, Member Conflicts SEP.
    Date: April 22, 2010.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIAAA, 5635 Fishers, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Office 
of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Room 2121, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a767d6f74607f687b5a777b737634747372347d756c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="78141f0d16021d0a19381519111456161110561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 26, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4586 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2016335EN.01004501.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/45

---

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2016 — Pshonka v Council

(Case T-380/14) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicant’s name - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Admissibility - Proof that inclusion on the list is justified - Manifestly well-founded action))

(2016/C 335/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Artem Viktorovych Pshonka (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: C. Constantina and J.-M. Reymond, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Bartelt and D. Gauci, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 66, p. 26) and of Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 66, p. 1), in so far as they relate to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine are annulled in so far as they relate to Mr Artem Viktorovych Pshonka. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine are annulled in so far as they relate to Mr Artem Viktorovych Pshonka.

| 2. | The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Pshonka. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Pshonka.

| 3. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.1640 Ophthalmic preamplifier. ( a ) *Identification.* An ophthalmic preamplifier is an AC-powered or battery-powered device intended to amplify electrical signals from the eye in electroretinography (recording retinal action currents from the surface of the eyeball after stimulation by light), electrooculography (testing for retinal dysfunction by comparing the standing potential in the front and the back of the eyeball), and electromyography (recording electrical currents generated in active muscle).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.