alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 
 
 By Notice dated October 16, 2009, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on October 28, 2009, (74 FR 55587), American Radiolabeled Chemical, Inc., 101 Arc Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63146, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010)
IIbogaine (7260)
ILysergic acid diethylamide (7315)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IDimethyltryptamine (7435)
I1-[1-(2-Thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine (7470)
IDihydromorphine (9145)
INormorphine (9313)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IIAmobarbital (2125)
IIPhencyclidine (7471)
IIPhenylacetone (8501)
IICocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIEcgonine (9180)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMetazocine (9240)
IIDextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms) (9273)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIOripavine (9330)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IIPhenazocine (9715)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances as radiolabeled compounds for biochemical research. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of American Radiolabeled Chemical, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated American Radiolabeled Chemical Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: February 24, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-4403 Filed 3-2-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                     48,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,772
<PP&E>                                         126,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,114
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,685
<SALES>                                         61,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,671
<CGS>                                           51,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (89)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,965
<INCOME-TAX>                                       697
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,657
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.40 Dehydrated beets (beet powder). ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive dehydrated beets is a dark red powder prepared by dehydrating sound, mature, good quality, edible beets.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures made with dehydrated beets may contain as diluents only those substances listed in this subpart as safe and suitable for use in color additive mixtures for coloring foods.
( b ) *Specifications.* The color additive shall conform to the following specifications: Volatile matter, not more than 4 percent. Acid insoluble ash, not more than 0.5 percent. Lead (as Pb), not more than 10 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 1 part per million. Mercury (as Hg), not more than 1 part per million.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* Dehydrated beets may be safely used for the coloring of foods generally in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice, except that it may not be used to color foods for which standards of identity have been promulgated under section 401 of the act, unless the use of added color is authorized by such standards.
( d ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
Exhibit 34.7



|     |  |                                                                                                                             
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Plante & Moran, PLLC
10 South Riverside Plaza 9thFloor Chicago, IL 60606
Tel: 312.207.1040 Fax:
312.207.1066 plantemoran.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined National Tax Search, LLC (the Company) compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company has determined that only
certain servicing criteria, 1112(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this
report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assertion about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a
sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have
occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2015 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.



/s/ Plante & Moran, PLCC


Chicago, IL

January 18,
2016



LOGO
# C_2014261EN.01003101.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/31

---

Action brought on 27 May 2014 — REWE-Zentral/OHIM — Vicente Gandia Pla (MY PLANET)

(Case T-362/14)

2014/C 261/55

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: REWE-Zentral AG (Köln, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter and A. Wagner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vicente Gandia Pla, SA (Chiva, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 March 2014 in Case R 201/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 March 2014 in Case R 201/2013-1;

| — | Condemn the defendant to the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Condemn the defendant to the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the word elements ‘MY PLANET’ for goods in classes 25, 32 and 33 — Community trade mark application No 8 566 515

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Vicente Gandia Pla, SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘EL MIRACLE PLANET’ for goods in classes 25, 32 and 33

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The Opposition was allowed

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 41(1) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.2730 Osmometer for clinical use. ( a ) *Identification.* An osmometer for clinical use is a device intended to measure the osmotic pressure of body fluids. Osmotic pressure is the pressure required to prevent the passage of a solution with a lesser solute concentration into a solution with greater solute concentration when the two solutions are separated by a semipermeable membrane. The concentration of a solution affects its osmotic pressure, freezing point, and other physiochemical properties. Osmometers determine osmotic pressure by methods such as the measurement of the freezing point. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of body fluid disorders.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2309, Jan. 14, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.4840 Rotary scaler. ( a ) *Identification.* A rotary scaler is an abrasive device intended to be attached to a powered handpiece to remove calculus deposits from teeth during dental cleaning and periodontal (gum) therapy.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
39033.

#### ROGERS v. LINDSEY STREET BAPTIST CHURCH.

Jordan, Judge.

The plaintiff filed a petition in the Civil Court of Fulton County against Lindsey Street Baptist Church seeking to foreclose a lien against certain described property of the defendant. It was alleged in the petition that the defendant was an unincorporated association and could be served by serving the pastor of the association, H. M. Alexander, at 992 Michigan Avenue, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia. The petition as amended prayed that process be directed to Lindsey Street Baptist Church and be served upon the defendant by *488service on the said H. M. Alexander, an official member of the Lindsey Street Baptist Church. The defendant demurred generally to the petition upon the ground that it affirmatively appeared from the petition that the defendant was an unincorporated association and was therefore not subject to suit. The demurrer was sustained, the court reciting in its order that no legal entity was made a party defendant to the suit. The exception is to this judgment. *Held:*

Decided September 28, 1961.

*Poole, Pearce & Hall, William F. Lovier,*for plaintiff in error.

*John C. Lee,*contra.

Under the act of the General Assembly of Georgia approved February 13, 1959 (Ga. L. 1959, p. 44; *Code Ann.*§ 3-118) providing that unincorporated associations may sue and be sued, and providing for service thereon, the defendant, as an unincorporated association, was subject to the instant suit, and the trial court erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Townsend, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Marketing
Services, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael M. Nicita, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of
                the dates indicated and results of operations of the Company for
                the periods indicated.



Date:  November 12, 2002                       /s/ Michael M. Nicita
       -----------------                       ---------------------------------
                                               Name:   Michael M. Nicita
                                               Title:  President and Chief
                                                       Executive Officer
# C_2015146EN.01004502.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/45

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 18 March 2015 — Ribeiro Sinde Monteiro v EEAS

(Case F-51/14) (1)

1

((Civil service - EEAS staff - Official - Promotion - Articles 43 and 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Consideration of comparative merits of all officials eligible for promotion - Officials proposed by the EEAS services and officials not proposed - Taking into account staff reports - Purely literal assessments))

(2015/C 146/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Manuel Jaime Ribeiro Sinde Monteiro (Brussles, Belgium) (represented by: initially D. de Abreu Caldas, M. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, and subsequently J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AST 3 in the 2013 promotion exercise and seeking damages for the non-material loss allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the appointing authority of the European External Action Services of 9 October 2013 fixing the list of officials promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise in so far as the name of Mr Riberio Sinde Monteiro is not included on that list. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the appointing authority of the European External Action Services of 9 October 2013 fixing the list of officials promoted in the 2013 promotion exercise in so far as the name of Mr Riberio Sinde Monteiro is not included on that list.

| 2. | There is no need to rule on the application as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to rule on the application as to the remainder.

| 3. | Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to pay the costs the costs incurred by Mr Ribeiro Sinde Monteiro. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to pay the costs the costs incurred by Mr Ribeiro Sinde Monteiro.

---

(1)  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014, p. 62.

1

---
§ 582.3013 Ascorbic acid. ( a ) *Product.* Ascorbic acid.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.
Exhibit 99.1

 

**ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

**TARGET NATIONAL BANK (FORMERLY RETAILERS NATIONAL BANK)**

 

**TARGET CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized representative of Target National Bank, (formerly known as RetailersNational Bank) as Servicer (“TNB”),pursuant to the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated asof April 28, 2000, as supplemented by the Series 2001-1 Supplement and the Series2002-1 Supplement (as may be amended and supplemented from time to time, the“Agreement”), among Target Receivables Corporation, as Transferor, TNB, as Servicer, and Wells FargoBank, National Association, (successorby merger to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association) as Trustee, does herebycertify that:

 

1.                                       TNB is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.  Capitalized terms used in this Certificatehave their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

 

2.                                       The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who isduly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver thiscertificate to the Trustee.

 

3.                                       A review of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2005, andof its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

 

4.                                       Based on such review, the Servicerhas, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects itsobligations under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in theperformance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as setforth in paragraph 5 below.

 

5.                                       The following is a description of eachdefault in the performance of the Servicer’s obligationsunder the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have been made by the Servicer during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2005 whichsets forth in detail (i) the nature of each default,(ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, toremedy each such default and (iii) the current status of each such default:None.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has duly executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of March,2005.

 
|    | **TARGET  NATIONAL BANK,**          |
|---------|-------------------------------------|
|    | **as Servicer,**                    |
|    |                                |
|    |                                |
| **By:** | /s/ Thomas A. Swanson               |   |
|    | Name: Thomas A. Swanson             |
|    | Title: Vice President & Cashier |
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3110

_____________________________
J UAN F RANCISCO V EGA and J AMAAL A LI B ILAL , Appellant s ,

v.

M IKE C ARROLL , Secretary, Fl orida Dep artment o f Children and Families
,
A ppellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings

. J. Bruce Culpepper, Administrative Law Judge

. September 27, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.2 ____________________________ _ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Juan Francisco Vega, pro se, and J amaal A li B ilal, pro se, Appellant s

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Karen A. Brodeen
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 582.5311 Ferrous lactate. ( a ) *Product.* Ferrous lactate.
( b ) *Conditions of use.* This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing or feeding practice.