alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 601.29 Guidance documents. ( a ) FDA has made available guidance documents under § 10.115 of this chapter to help you comply with certain requirements of this part.
( b ) The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) maintains a list of guidance documents that apply to the center's regulations. The lists are maintained on the Internet and are published annually in the Federal Register. You may request a copy of the CBER list from the Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3103, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
[65 FR 56480, Sept. 19, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 14984, Mar. 24, 2005; 80 FR 18092, Apr. 3, 2015]
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer



 
EXHIBIT 10.2

 
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER 
 
I, Rolando Zubirán Shelter, certify that:

 
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of
Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V.; 
 
2.  Based on my
knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report; 
 
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 
 
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

	 	a.	 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

	 	b.	 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report
(the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

	 	c.	 	presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


 
5.  The registrant’s other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 
 

	 	a.	 	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

	 	b.	 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and


 
6.  The registrant’s other
certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 
 
Date: March 31, 2003 
 

	 /S/    ROLANDO ZUBIRÁN
SHELTER

 Rolando Zubirán Shelter
 Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.3a

                                                                            1986
Exhibit B

                      EXECUTIVES' BENEFIT SUMMARY DOCUMENT
                                       FOR
                                    BILL POST

                                          Annual Retirement     Total Retirement
Age          Year            Date              Benefit               Benefit
---          ----            ----              -------               -------
 60          2010           2-15-10            $162,020            $1,620,200
 61          2011           2-15-11             172,551             1,725,510
 62          2012           2-15-12             183,767             1,837,670
 63          2013           2-15-13             195,712             1,957,120
 64          2014           2-15-14             208,433             2,084,330
 65          2015           2-15-15             221,981             2,219,809
 66          2016           2-15-16             236,410             2,364,100

                                                                            1985
Exhibit B

                      EXECUTIVES' BENEFIT SUMMARY DOCUMENT
                                       FOR
                                   JOHN DAVIS

                                          Annual Retirement     Total Retirement
Age          Year            Date              Benefit               Benefit
---          ----            ----              -------               -------
 60          2006           3-15-06            $ 57,583            $  575,830
 61          2007           3-15-07              61,326               613,260
 62          2008           3-15-08              65,312               653,120
 63          2009           3-15-09              69,558               695,580
 64          2010           3-15-10              74,079               740,790
 65          2011           3-15-11              78,894               788,940
<PAGE>
                                                                            1984
Exhibit B

                      EXECUTIVES' BENEFIT SUMMARY DOCUMENT
                                       FOR
                                  JOHN E. DAVIS

                                          Annual Retirement     Total Retirement
Age          Year            Date              Benefit               Benefit
---          ----            ----              -------               -------
 60          2006           2-15-06            $ 94,454            $  944,540
 61          2007           2-15-07             100,594             1,005,940
 62          2008           2-15-08             107,132             1,071,320
 63          2009           2-15-09             114,096             1,140,960
 64          2010           2-15-10             121,512             1,215,120
 65          2011           2-15-11             129,410             1,294,100
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in LocalRule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-40656

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

CHARLES EVERETT BILLS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(4:93-CR-62-1)

January 28, 1997

Before WISDOM, KING, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

In this appeal, we are asked to review a jury’s finding that the defendant, Charles Everett

Bills, was not entrapped by federal agents in his arrest for various drug trafficking offenses. The

defendant further asserts that federal prosecutors violated the Jencks Act by not producing a

transcript of prior testimony by one of the government’s witnesses. Having thoroughly reviewed the

record and the testimony in question, we AFFIRM.

I.
1 United States v. Rodriguez, 43 F.3d 117, 126 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 115 S.Ct. 2260

(1995).

2

Id.

3 Rosenberg v. United States, 360 U.S. 367, 375-76 (1959).

4

18 U.S.C. § 3500.

5 United States v. Keller, 14 F.3d 1051, 1055 (5th Cir. 1994), quoting United States

v. Merlino, 595 F.2d 1016, 1019 (5th Cir. 1979).

2

The jury’s finding that the defendant was not entrapped may only be disturbed if we

conclude that no rational jury could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant

was predisposed to commit the offenses.1 We must view every fact in the light most favorable to

the jury’s verdict.2 A review of the record reveals ample evidence against the defendant. 

Moreover, the defendant’s entrapment theory was supported solely by his own testimony. As

such, a rational juror could easily have found that the defendant was not entrapped, but rather

possessed the required predisposition to commit the instant offenses.

II.

Courts should be hesitant to conclude that the defense could not have effectively utilized a

producible statement had it been properly in their possession.3 Here, the government failed to

produce a transcript of prior testimony by Officer Robinson. Such material is arguably a

“statement” within the purview of the Jencks Act.4 Failure to produce a statement that is required

to be so produced under the Jencks Act is harmless error, however, where there is no “substantial

inconsistency, contradiction or variation” between the prior statements and the witnesses trial

testimony.5 Having reviewed Officer Robinson’s testimony at trial and his testimony from the

revocation hearing, we find no such inconsistency. We find, further, that the evidence was not
6

373 U.S. 83 (1963).

3

exculpatory. Hence, the defendant’s rights under Brady v. Maryland6 were not violated.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,116
<INVENTORY>                                      9,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,824
<PP&E>                                           8,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,666
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,832
<COMMON>                                        43,257
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,383)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,323
<SALES>                                         18,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,382
<CGS>                                           12,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,512
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016007EN.01002401.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2015 — ClientEarth v Commission

(Joined Cases T-424/14 and T-425/14) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Draft impact assessment report, impact assessment report and opinion of the Impact Assessment Board - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Duty to state reasons - Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination - Overriding public interest))

(2016/C 007/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. Brouwer, F. Heringa and J. Wolfhagen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Applications for annulment of (i) the Commission’s decision of 1 April 2014 refusing to grant access to an Impact Assessment report for a proposed binding instrument setting a strategic framework for risk-based inspection and surveillance in relation to EU environmental legislation and an opinion of the Impact Assessment Board and (ii) the Commission’s decision of 3 April 2014 refusing to grant access to a draft Impact Assessment report relating to access to justice in environmental matters at Member State level in the field of EU environmental policy and an opinion of the Impact Assessment Board.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11166-11167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR10-9-000]


Enbridge Pipelines (North Dakota) LLC; Notice of Motion to 
Approve Modification of Approved Facilities Surcharge Settlement

March 1, 2010.
    Take notice that on January 29, 2010, Enbridge Pipelines (North 
Dakota) LLC (Enbridge), with the support of twelve Shippers and a 
Connecting Pipeline, submitted a modification to the Offer of 
Settlement (Supplement) approved in Docket No. OR06-9-000 (The Looping 
Surcharge), 117 FERC ] 61,131 (2006).
    Any person desiring to intervene and comment on this Supplement to 
the Settlement should submit an original and 14 copies of its comments 
and motion to intervene with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, no later than 5 p.m. 
Eastern time on March 5, 2010. Reply comments will be due no later than 
5 p.m. Eastern time on March 12, 2010.

[[Page 11167]]

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of comments and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. The filings in this proceeding are accessible on-line at 
http://www.ferc.gov., using the ``eLibrary'' link and is available for 
review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. 
There is an ``eSubcription'' link on the Web site that enables 
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to 
a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, 
please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aaeceff8e9e5c4c6c3c4cff9dfdadac5d8deeacccfd8c984cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45030017060a2b292c2b20163035352a373105232037266b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll 
free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4994 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2016392EN.01002801.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Crosfield Italia v ECHA

(Case T-587/14) (1)

1

((REACH - Fee for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to micro-, small-and medium-sized enterprises - Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Decision imposing an administrative charge - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 392/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Crosfield Italia Srl (Verona, Italy) (represented by: M. Baldassarri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented initially by M. Heikkilä, E. Bigi, J.-P. Trnka and E. Maurage, and subsequently by M. Heikkilä, J.-P. Trnka and E. Maurage, Agents, and by C. Garcia Molyneux, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU, for annulment of Decision SME(2013) 4672 of the ECHA of 28 May 2014, which states that the applicant does not fulfil the conditions to receive a reduction of the fee for small enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it and, second, under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the invoices issued by the ECHA following adoption of Decision SME(2013) 4672.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision SME(2013) 4672 of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) of 28 May 2014; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision SME(2013) 4672 of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) of 28 May 2014;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 361, 13.10.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                     U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 8-K
                                 Current Report

     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

       Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) February 10, 1999

                        Leading-Edge Earth Products, Inc.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>                     <C>            
         Oregon                  93-67656-S                    93-1002429     
------------------------        ------------            -----------------------
(State of incorporation)        (Commission             (I.R.S. Employer ID No.)
                                file number)
</TABLE>

                   319 Nickerson St., #186, Seattle, WA 98109
              ----------------------------------------------------
              (Address of principal executive offices ) (Zip Code)

                   Issuer's telephone number     800-788-3599
                                                 ------------

                                    no change
                                    ---------
          (former name or former address, if changed since last report)

<PAGE>   2

                                 8-K INFORMATION
Item 5. Other Events. See Attachment.
                                               Leading-Edge Earth Products, Inc.

Date: February 10, 1999                        Grant C. Record, Secretary


                                 8-K ATTACHMENT

On January 26, 1999, the Company purchased from Union Pacific Railroad Company a
36.35-acre rail-side industrial park site within the city limits of Shoshone,
Idaho, for $73,020. The source of the funds was a promissory note from an
outside individual.

Previous negotiations for 35 acres were amended by the parties for an additional
1.35 acres to satisfy a title insurance requirement for improved access to
public roads.

The Company is organizing financing for construction on this vacant site of a
90,000-sq.ft. building to house a full-scale, continuous, polyurethane/metal
LEEP STRUCTURAL CORE production line.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 
4 OF THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000814562
<NAME>                        OPPENHEIMER CAPITAL, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000                                     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 123
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    23,363<F1>
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     120,611<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               23,542
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          97,069<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       120,611
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    36,610
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     35,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 35,240
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        35,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.35
<FN>
<F1> CURRENT ASSETS IS COMPRISED OF CASH ($123), DISTRIBUTION RECEIVABLE 
     ($22,702), AND INTEREST RECEIVABLE ($538)
<F2> TOTAL ASSETS INCLUDE CURRENT ASSETS PLUS INVESTMENT IN OPPENHEIMER CAPITAL
     ($26,914), A NON-TRADE NOTE RECEIVABLE ($32,193), GOODWILL ($38,001) AND
     OTHER ASSETS ($140)
<F3> OTHER SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY IS COMPROSED OF GENERAL PARTNER'S CAPITAL
     ($984) AND LIMITED PARTNERS' CAPITAL ($96,085)
</FN>

        


</TABLE>