alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
j ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 24-0006 

IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM 

BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER 

FILED 

MAR 2 6 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

SI:ate of Al,onteria 

ORDER 

Joëlle C. Klein has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of Montana 

pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, 

goveming admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions 

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on 

Character and Fitness has certified that Klein has provided the necessary documentation 

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV of the Rules for 

Admission to the State Bar of Montana. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Joelle C. Klein may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing-in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this 24, day of March, 2024. 

Chief Justice 

03/26/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0006
Cal 4~ett 

Justices
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 9, 2015

t1202

Order 

Clerk

December 9, 2015

151715

MARKETPLACE OF ROCHESTER HILLS

PARCEL B, LLC, MARKETPLACE OF

ROCHESTER HILLS PARCEL C, LLC,

MARKETPLACE OF ROCHESTER HILLS

PARCEL D, LLC, and MARKETPLACE OF

ROCHESTER HILLS PARCEL G, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 151715

COA: 318894

Oakland CC: 2013-134395-CB

COMERICA BANK,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE those parts of the Court of Appeals 

judgment stating that the same transaction test for compulsory joinder and res judicata is 

“if the same facts or evidence are essential to the maintenance of the two actions” and 

whether the two claims “concern identical evidence or essential facts.” The proper test is 

“‘whether the facts are related in time, space, origin or motivation, [and] whether they 

form a convenient trial unit . . . .’” Adair v Michigan, 470 Mich 105, 125 (2004), quoting 

46 Am Jur 2d, Judgments § 533, p 801. When the same transaction test is properly 

applied to this case, the result reached by the Court of Appeals is correct. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J., not participating due to a familial relationship with one of the 

named guarantors in this case.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1



    CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of ST Assembly Test
Services Ltd, a Singapore corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that,
to the best of such officer's knowledge:

     1.   The accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the
          fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ST Assembly Test Services Ltd and will retained by ST Assembly Test
Services Ltd and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.





                                           /s/ Tan Lay Koon
                                         -------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Tan Lay Koon
                                  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                  Date:  March 31, 2003


                                           /s/ Pearlyne Wang
                                         -------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Pearlyne Wang
                                  Title: Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                  Date:  March 31, 2003

In accordance with the interim guidance for Section 906 certification issued by
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 in
Release No. 33-8212, this certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to
the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that ST Assembly Test
Services Ltd specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 34.2




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board of Directors

U.S. Bank National Association
 
   We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the company provides trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(v)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.
  Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.
  In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended March 31, 2016, for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.
   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
  Minneapolis, Minnesota
 May 27, 2016
Editorial Note on Part 864
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 864 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 864.8100 Bothrops atrox reagent. ( a ) *Identification.* A Bothrops atrox reagent is a device made from snake venom and used to determine blood fibrinogen levels to aid in the evaluation of disseminated intravascular coagulation (nonlocalized clotting in the blood vessels) in patients receiving heparin therapy (the administration of the anticoagulant heparin in the treatment of thrombosis) or as an aid in the classification of dysfibrinogenemia (presence in the plasma of functionally defective fibrinogen).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
[45 FR 60629, Sept. 12, 1980]
# C_2016343EN.01004901.xml

| 19.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/49

---

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2016 — Grandi Navi Veloci v Commission

(Case T-506/14) (1)

1

(2016/C 343/67)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.

1

---
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NJ 07311                | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Diane Moser                    | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 500 Woodward Ave |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | Mail code:  MI-01-20-TRES |
|                                            | Detroit, MI 48226 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
EXHIBIT 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Form S-8 Registration
Statement of BankFirst Corporation,  of our report dated January 21, 2000 on the
consolidated  financial  statements of BankFirst  Corporation as of December 31,
1999 and 1998 and for each of the three years in the period ending  December 31,
1999 as included in the registrant's annual report on Form 10-K.


Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
May 17, 2000
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.92    
  


 
 

EXTENSION AGREEMENT    
  


Bank
of America, N.A.,

as Administrative Agent

Attn: Suzanne Paul

231 South LaSalle Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604 


Ladies
and Gentlemen: 


        The
undersigned hereby agrees to extend, effective April 3, 2002, its Commitment and the Maturity Date under the Credit Agreement dated as of April 3, 2001 among
SOURCECORP, Incorporated, f/k/a F.Y.I. Incorporated, each of the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and
sole book agent (as the same may be amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement") for 364 days to April 2, 2005
pursuant to Section 2.1(d) of the Credit Agreement. Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein as therein defined. 


        This
Extension Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of Texas. The Extension Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. 



	

 	
 	
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
	

 	
 	

Name:	

/s/  ROBERT WILSON      

	 	 	 	By:	Robert Wilson

	 	 	 	Title:	Vice President






	

Agreed and Accepted:
	

SOURCECORP, INCORPORATED, f/k/a

F.Y.I. INCORPORATED
	

By:	

/s/  BARRY EDWARDS      

	Name:	Barry Edwards

	Title:	EVP & CFO

	

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Administrative Agent
	

By:	

/s/  SUZANNE M. PAUL      

	Name:	Suzanne M. Paul

	Title:	Vice President












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.92


EXTENSION AGREEMENT
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2245
MELDON S. HOLLIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT GORDON; TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nick erson, District Judge. (CA-96-2474-WMN) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Meldon Stonewall Hollis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Frederick Charles Leiner, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil suit to enjoin the enforcement of a state court judgment and denying his motion for a temporary restraining order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. Hollis v. Gordon , No. CA-96-2474-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00038-CR

Edgar Alfredo Mata

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1231766D)

June 20, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron Street Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2015, by and among CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL LOAN ADVISORS, LLC, as Special Servicer, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Adminstrator, and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee , with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from May 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.5380 Free secretory component immunological test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A free secretory component immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques free secretory component (normally a portion of the secretory IgA antibody molecule) in body fluids. Measurement of free secretory component (protein molecules) aids in the diagnosis or repetitive lung infections and other hypogammaglobulinemic conditions (low antibody levels).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 63 FR 59227, Nov. 3, 1998]
EXHIBIT 32.2
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  quarterly  report of Avitar,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on
Form10-QSB/A  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jay C.
Leatherman,  Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: February 14, 2006

                                       /s/ Jay C. Leatherman, Jr.
                                       -------------------------
                                       Jay C. Leatherman, Jr.
                                       Chief Financial Officer (Principal
                                       Financial and Accounting Officer),
                                       Secretary
# C_2014282EN.01005102.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/51

---

Action brought on 30 June 2014 — Bodegas Muga v Commission

(Case T-491/14)

2014/C 282/67

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bodegas Muga, SL (Haro, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it categorises the measures which, according to that decision, together constitute the ‘Spanish Tax Lease System’ as new State aid that is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Articles 1 and 4 of the contested decision, which identify the investors in the Economic Interest Groupings (EIGs) as the beneficiaries of the alleged aid and as the sole addressees of the order for recovery;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it orders recovery of the alleged aid in breach of general principles of EU law;

| — | in any event, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, annul Article 4 of the contested decision, in so far as it makes a determination as to the lawfulness of private contracts between the investors and other entities; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission.

Bankia

Commission

---
Exhibit 32.2

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ebix, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert F. Kerris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Robert Kerris      
|    |  | Name: Robert Kerris    
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer

January 9, 2012