alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4200 Introduction/drainage catheter and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* An introduction/drainage catheter is a device that is a flexible single or multilumen tube intended to be used to introduce nondrug fluids into body cavities other than blood vessels, drain fluids from body cavities, or evaluate certain physiologic conditions. Examples include irrigation and drainage catheters, pediatric catheters, peritoneal catheters (including dialysis), and other general surgical catheters. An introduction/drainage catheter accessory is intended to aid in the manipulation of or insertion of the device into the body. Examples of accessories include adaptors, connectors, and catheter needles.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 878.9.
[53 FR 23872, June 24, 1988, as amended at 65 FR 2318, Jan. 14, 2000]
July 9 , 2015

Mr. N orman Whitehurst

2845 Notre Dame Blvd.

Suite 370

- 101

Ch ico, CA 95928

Dear Mr. Whitehurst :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your July 1 st 2015 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

-

2678 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief , the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safet y or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to p rocess your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption

.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Ana lyst

, Airmen and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
§ 884.2050 Obstetric data analyzer. ( a ) *Identification.* An obstetric data analyzer (fetal status data analyzer) is a device used during labor to analyze electronic signal data obtained from fetal and maternal monitors. The obstetric data analyzer provides clinical diagnosis of fetal status and recommendations for labor management and clinical interventions. This generic type of device may include signal analysis and display equipment, electronic interfaces for other equipment, and power supplies and component parts.
( b ) *Classification:* Class III (premarket approval).
( c ) *Date PMA or notice of completion of PDP is required.* A PMA or a notice of completion of a PDP is required to be filed with the Food and Drug Administration on or before October 3, 2000, for any obstetric data analyzer described in paragraph (a) of this section that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or that has been found, on or before October 3, 2000, to be substantially equivalent to an obstetric data analyzer described in paragraph (a) of this section that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976. Any other obstetric data analyzer described in paragraph (a) of this section shall have an approved PMA or declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.
[65 FR 41332, July 5, 2000]
Exhibit 15.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of Coca-Cola European Partners plc:


|  |                                                                     
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | Registration Statement No. 333-208556 on Form S-8, dated 1 June 2016

|  |                                                                     
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|• | Registration Statement No. 333-211764 on Form S-8, dated 1 June 2016

of our report dated 11 April 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Coca-Cola European Partners plc (successor to Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.) included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Coca-Cola European Partners plc for the year ended 31 December 2016.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP








Atlanta, Georgia


11 April 2017
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CEC  Entertainment,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 26, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                            /s/ Christopher D. Morris
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Christopher D. Morris
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            November 4, 2004



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to CEC  Entertainment,  Inc. and will be retained by CEC Entertainment,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                          24,969
<SECURITIES>                                     5,140
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,803
<INVENTORY>                                    110,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               234,003
<PP&E>                                          16,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,613
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,671
<SALES>                                        130,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               130,782
<CGS>                                          115,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   193
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,614
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,472
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28


</TABLE>
# C_2014303EN.01005001.xml

| 8.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/50

---

Action brought on 11 July 2014 — bd breyton-design v OHIM (RACE GTP)

(Case T-520/14)

2014/C 303/59

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: bd breyton-design GmbH (Stockach, Germany) (represented by T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 March 2014 in case R 1230/2013-1 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 March 2014 in case R 1230/2013-1 in its entirety;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘RACE GTP’ for goods in class 12 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 0 18  918

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 and infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1935 Near Infrared (NIR) Brain Hematoma Detector. ( a ) *Identification.* A Near Infrared (NIR) Brain Hematoma Detector is a noninvasive device that employs near-infrared spectroscopy that is intended to be used to evaluate suspected brain hematomas.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The sale, distribution, and use of this device are restricted to prescription use in accordance with § 801.109 of this chapter;
( 2 ) The labeling must include specific instructions and the clinical training needed for the safe use of this device;
( 3 ) Appropriate analysis/testing should validate electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), electrical safety, and battery characteristics;
( 4 ) Performance data should validate accuracy and precision and safety features;
( 5 ) Any elements of the device that may contact the patient should be demonstrated to be biocompatible; and,
( 6 ) Appropriate software verification, validation, and hazard analysis should be performed.
[77 FR 16927, Mar. 23, 2012]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services****MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380** |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C30

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# C_2014102EN.01003801.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/38

---

Action brought on 4 February 2014 — Red Bull v OHIM — Automobili Lamborghini (Representation of two bulls)

(Case T-73/14)

2014/C 102/59

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, J. Fuhrmann and A. Renck, lawyers, and I. Fowler, solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Automobili Lamborghini SpA (Sant’ Agata Bolognese, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 November 2013 in Case R 1263/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 November 2013 in Case R 1263/2012-1;

| — | order the defendant and, in the event of the formal intervention, also the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and, in the event of the formal intervention, also the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: Figurative mark representing two bulls for goods in Class 12 (Community trade mark No 3 629 342)

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: Automobili Lamborghini SpA

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: The application for revocation was granted

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
Editorial Note on Part 886
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 886 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 886.5540 Low-vision magnifier. ( a ) *Identification.* A low-vision magnifier is a device that consists of a magnifying lens intended for use by a patient who has impaired vision. The device may be held in the hand or attached to spectacles.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 886.9. The device is also exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 33355, Sept. 2, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 35607, Sept. 14, 1988; 66 FR 38814, July 25, 2001]
Editorial Note on Part 878
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 878 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 878.4400 Electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories. ( a ) *Identification.* An electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device and accessories is a device intended to remove tissue and control bleeding by use of high-frequency electrical current.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II.
Nemo

Piedmont

Meade

Pennington

Lawrence

Pennington

Meade

Lawrence

T03NR05E

T03NR06E

T02NR06E T02NR05E

T03NR07E

T02NR07E

T04NR05E T04NR06E

T03NR04E

T02NR04E

T04NR04E

1

7

6

2

8

8

4

8

3

1

2

9

4

5 4

5

5

3

5

7

7

1

8

2

3

9

8

9

6

5

4

9

7

6

8

6

6

7

7

11

12

11

11

11

18

31

19

30

9

31

36

34 32

24

33

25

12

16

26

12

10

36

13

34

14

23

33

32

21

35

17

28

27

12

14

23

32

24

13

10

22

27

29 25

31

16

22

15

19

20

29

20

17

10

26

10

21

30

15

35

29

31

18

30 28

19

18

20

17

32 33

34

35 36 31 32

4

33

9

1

13 18 17

14 15

1

13 16

16

17

21

18

28

14

15

33

18 17 16

12

36

25

24

13

12

36

16

.

13

0 0.5 1 2 3

Miles

Steamboat Project Area

Steamboat Boundary

Private Land

Mountain Pine Beetle Risk

High

Medium

Low
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UNISON SOFTWARE, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
MAY 31, 1997 INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           10674
<SECURITIES>                                     15824
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13775
<ALLOWANCES>                                       388
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 36630
<PP&E>                                            4190
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   43432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            13011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                       29874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     43432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 39836
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 27593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8752
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5382
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45
        

</TABLE>
#### Ruth E. Jensen et al. *v.*Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

*Vincent Villano,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

*George E. McGoldricJc,*for the appellee (defendant).

Argued December 3

decided December 3, 1968

It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the plaintiffs file their brief on or before December 19, 1968.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Amistad National Recreation Area huntingregulations.
 
2006/2007 | 2007/2008| 2008/2009 | 2009/2010
2010/2011 | 2013/2014 | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.9:AM 5/
Item Number:0656 (online)
CGP System Number:000994746
 
 
September 15, 2017**