alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 556.163 Clorsulon. ( a ) *Acceptable daily intake (ADI).* The ADI for total residue of clorsulon is 8 μg/kg of body weight per day.
( b ) *Tolerances.* The tolerances for clorsulon (marker residue) are: ( 1 ) *Cattle.* ( i ) Kidney (target tissue): 1.0 ppm.
( ii ) Muscle: 0.1 ppm.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Related conditions of use.* See §§ 520.462 and 522.1193 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1,210,155
<SECURITIES>                                     54,020,973
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6,418,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                       7,332,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 73,723,561
<PP&E>                                            2,265,956
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   77,348,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,640,571
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            192,946
<OTHER-SE>                                       69,515,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     77,348,763
<SALES>                                          11,934,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 11,934,437
<CGS>                                             4,688,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13,211,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (5,066,909)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (2,100,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,966,909)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,966,909)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.18)
        


</TABLE>
#### Mango v. Mango

*Anthony J. Smith,*for plaintiff.

*William T. Connor,*for defendant.

October 15, 1952.

Bok, P. J.,

This is a petition by a wife defendant in a divorce case to refer the case back to the master in order to allow her to present a defense.

The petition must be denied.

In the ordinary case, which this is not, public policy gives such a petition an almost overwhelming impetus. Here the petition was filed on October 6,1952, and the final rule was on our motion list for October 10th. The master’s report was filed August 20th.

The master held two hearings, one on June 23, 1952, and the other on July 18th. Defendant appeared at the earlier hearing unrepresented and in effect requested time in which to get a lawyer. The master *460then set the date of July 18th for a second hearing, and Mr. Connor’s appearance for defendant was filed on July 2nd. By letter dated July 2nd, Mr. Connor advised the master that defendant did not care to contest the case, and the hearing was accordingly held without her.

It appears also that on July 15th defendant’s rule was made absolute for $250 counsel fee and a lump sum of $1,250 for alimony pendente lite.

In the testimony reference was made, rather vaguely, to a previous divorce action brought by defendant. A search of the court records and examination of the papers in that case reveal that such suit was brought in Court of Common Pleas No. 3, as of March term, 1948, no. 4020. The master recommended a dismissal of the complaint, and court no. 3 approved the master’s report and dismissed the complaint on April 20,1951.

The present action was begun by complaint filed on September 29, 1951.

This history of the proceedings impeaches the good faith of the instant petition. Unsuccessful in a full divorce action, defendant not *only*failed to file an answer in the present one but having asked and been given time to get a lawyer decided not to contest. Thereafter she received $1,500 by rule, and filed no exceptions to the master’s report. Only at the very last minute does she ask to offer a defense, but her actions convince us that her request is not sincere. We also note the reaction of the master in the earlier action to defendant’s testimony as a plaintiff:

> “The master . . . was not impressed with its sincerity, accuracy, or truthfulness. . . . Plaintiff was in turn irresponsive, imperious, contradictory, incoherent, and rambling . . . and regarded (the hearing) as but a technical and annoying formality.”

The petition is denied.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Rudolph Saavedra

*Zbigniew 8. Bozbicki,*in support of the application.

Submitted January 14

decided January 22, 1969

The application by the defendant for a stay and for admission to bail is denied.
N OTICE O F L ODGING O F P ROPOSED C ONSENT D ECREE C ASE N O

. 2:15

- cv

- 3798

- ODW (ASx) 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 JOHN C. CRUDEN Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice LESLIE M. HILL (D.C. Bar No. 476008) Leslie.Hill@usdoj.gov Environmental Defense Section 601 D Street N.W., Suite 8000 Washington D.C. 2 0004 Telephone (202) 514

- 0375 Facsimile (202) 514

- 8865

Attorneys for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

SIERRA CLUB, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTI ON AGENCY, et al.

Defendants. Case No. 2:15

- cv

- 3798

- ODW (ASx)

NOTICE OF LODGING OF PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE

Defendants, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) , Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of EPA , and Jare d Blumenfeld, in his official capacity as Regional Administrator of EPA , Region IX, “EPA” )
, hereby lodge with the Court a proposed C onsent D ecree that contains the terms of a proposed

settlement of this action. See Exhibit A, Pro posed Consent Decree. The proposed consent decree should not be signed or entered by the Court at

this time. Pursuant to section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g), the

C onsent D ecree is not final and cannot be entered by the Court until t he EPA Case 2:15-cv-03798-ODW-AS Document 15 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:42N OTICE O F L ODGING O F P ROPOSED C ONSENT D ECREE C ASE N O

. 2:15

- cv

- 3798

- ODW (ASx) 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Administrator provides “a reasonable opportunity by notice in the Federal Register to persons who are not named as parties or intervenors to the action” to comment in writing upon the proposed D ecree. Accordingly, EPA will publish in the Federal Re gister a notice of the proposed C onsent D ecree and request comments. After the public comment period ends , the EPA Administrator and the Attorney General, as appropriate, will promptly consider any written comments received and, if none of the comments di sclose facts or considerations which indicate that the proposed C onsent D ecree is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, EPA will move for entry of the D ecree.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: Septemb er 2 8 , 2015

JOHN C. CRUDEN Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division

/s/ Leslie M. Hill LESLIE M. HILL (D.C. Bar No. 476008) U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section 601 D Street N.W., Suite 8000 Washington D.C. 20004 Leslie.Hill@usdoj.gov Telephone (202) 514

- 0375 Facsimile (202) 514

- 8865

Attorney s for Defendant

Of counsel:

Geoffrey L. Wilcox Office of General Counsel Jeanhee Hong Assistant Regional Counsel, Regio n IX U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Case 2:15-cv-03798-ODW-AS Document 15 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:43
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Monetary, Credit and Fiscal Policies

              																	United States. Congress. Joint Committee on the Economic Report, 1946-1956					 and 	Eighty-First Congress, 1949-1951. 						*Monetary, Credit and Fiscal Policies : A Collection of Statements Submitted to the Subcommittee on Monetary, Credit and Fiscal Policies, by Government Officials, Bankers, Economists, and Others*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										November 7, 1949,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/399,			accessed on August 29, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CELERIS CORPORATION DATED DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,949,478
<SECURITIES>                                22,046,671
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,162,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                    59,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,299,191
<PP&E>                                         189,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,670,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,073,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,574
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,499,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,670,557
<SALES>                                      5,101,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,101,627
<CGS>                                        3,423,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,767,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                857,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            857,448
<DISCONTINUED>                             (19,902,083)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (19,044,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.76)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014261EN.01003501.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/35

---

Action brought on 26 May 2014 — HK Intertrade v Council

(Case T-372/14)

2014/C 261/60

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: HK Intertrade Co. Ltd (Wanchai, Hong-Kong) (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, P. Gjørtler, G. Pandey, D. Rovetta, D. Sellers and N. Pilkington, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Council decision contained in the letter of 14 March 2014, addressed to the lawyers of the applicant, concerning review of the list of designated persons and entities in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran, as amended by Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012, and in Annex IX to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012, in so far as the contested decision constitutes a refusal to remove the applicant from the list of persons and entities made subject to the restrictive measures; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Council decision contained in the letter of 14 March 2014, addressed to the lawyers of the applicant, concerning review of the list of designated persons and entities in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran, as amended by Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012, and in Annex IX to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012, in so far as the contested decision constitutes a refusal to remove the applicant from the list of persons and entities made subject to the restrictive measures;

| — | join the present proceedings with the case T-159/13 in accordance with Article 50(1) of the Rules of Procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

join the present proceedings with the case T-159/13 in accordance with Article 50(1) of the Rules of Procedure;

| — | order the Council to bear the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to bear the costs of the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, alleging that the statement of grounds was insufficient and that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment.

The applicant argues that although it is a subsidiary of the listed company National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), the Council has not substantiated that this entails any economic benefit for the Iranian State that would be contrary to the objective pursued by the contested measures. The applicant further submits that the Council has in fact never designated the applicant and that this error cannot be remedied by means of a corrigendum as the Council did.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William A. Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/ William A. Carter


William A. Carter, M.D.


Chief Executive Officer


March 20, 2015
OMB Support Statement Study of Enhanced College Advising in Upward Bound

Abt Associates Inc. Appendix F. Non-Disclosure Agreement ▌ pg F-1

Appendix F. Data User Non-Disclosure Agreement
OMB Support Statement Study of Enhanced College Advising in Upward Bound

Abt Associates Inc. Appendix F. Non-Disclosure Agreement ▌ pg F-2

I understand that, during the performance of the Study of Enhanced College Advising in Upward 

Bound, I may be given access to information of a confidential, proprietary, sensitive, or private 

nature. I agree that I shall only use this information to carry out my work and will follow the required 

procedures to protect the information from unauthorized release or disclosure. I further acknowledge 

that, while this information is in my possession, I shall be responsible to protect it from unauthorized 

disclosure and to restrict access to those who have a bona fide requirement for such access. 

I affirm that I have received a written and/or verbal briefing/training by my company concerning my 

responsibilities under this Agreement. I understand that violation of this Agreement may be cause for 

dismissal without notice.

Printed Name: _______________________________________

Signature: ___________________________________________

Date: _______________________________________________
Exhibit 32.1



November 12, 2003



Securities and Exchange Commission

Judiciary Plaza

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



| | RE: | Correspondence Providing Certification Pursuant to
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------

| |  | § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
| |  | ---------------------------------------



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q of
STERIS Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officers
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to STERIS Corporation and will be retained by STERIS Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/    Les C. VinneyName: Les C. Vinney Title: President and Chief Executive Officer/s/    Laurie BrlasName: Laurie Brlas Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




29
Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet 

Kentucky Division for Air Quality 

------------------------------------------- 

Appendix C.3 

Secondary Organic Aerosol 

Module 

Modifications in CMAQ 

 

Appendix C.3 - 1 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
[This page intentionally left blank.]

Appendix C.3 - 2 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 3 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 4 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 5 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 6 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 7 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 8 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 9 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 10 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 11 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 12 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 13 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 14 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix C.3 - 15 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
§ 74.101 FD&C Blue No. 1. ( a ) *Identity.* ( 1 ) The color additive FD&C Blue No. 1 is principally the disodium salt of ethyl [4-[*p*-[ethyl (*m*-sulfobenzyl) amino]-α-(*o*-sulfophenyl) benzylidene] - 2,5 -cyclohexadien - 1 - ylidene] (*m*-sulfobenzyl) ammonium hydroxide inner salt with smaller amounts of the isomeric disodium salts of ethyl [4-[*p*-[ethyl(*p*-sulfobenzyl) amino]-α-(*o*-sulfophenyl) benzylidene]-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-ylidene] (*p*-sulfobenzyl) ammonium hydroxide inner salt and ethyl [4-[*p*-[ethyl (*o*-sulfobenzyl) amino] - α - (*o* -sulfophenyl) benzylidene]-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-ylidene] (*o*-sulfobenzyl) ammonium hydroxide inner salt.
( 2 ) Color additive mixtures for food use (including dietary supplements) made with FD&C Blue No. 1 may contain only those diluents that are suitable and that are listed in part 73 of this chapter as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring foods.
( b ) *Specifications.* FD&C Blue No. 1 shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities other than those named to the extent that such other impurities may be avoided by current good manufacturing practice: Sum of volatile matter (at 135 °C) and chlorides and sulfates (calculated as sodium salts), not more than 15.0 percent. Water-insoluble matter, not more than 0.2 percent. Leuco base, not more than 5 percent. Sum of *o*-, *m*-, and *p*-sulfobenzaldehydes, not more than 1.5 percent. *N*-Ethyl,*N*-(*m*-sulfobenzyl)sulfanilic acid, not more than 0.3 percent. Subsidiary colors, not more than 6.0 percent. Chromium (as Cr), not more than 50 parts per million. Manganese (as Mn), not more than 100 parts per million. Arsenic (as As), not more than 3 parts per million. Lead (as Pb), not more than 10 parts per million. Total color, not less than 85.0 percent.
( c ) *Uses and restrictions.* FD&C Blue No. 1 may be safely used for coloring foods (including dietary supplements) generally in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice except that it may not be used to color foods for which standards of identity have been promulgated under section 401 of the act unless added color is authorized by such standards.
( d ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive and any mixtures prepared therefrom intended solely or in part for coloring purposes shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( e ) *Certification.* All batches of FD&C Blue No. 1 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
[42 FR 15654, Mar. 22, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 17511, Apr. 5, 1993]