alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12
                              FORMICA CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (in millions, except ratio data)

                                 Three-months ended            Six-months ended
                                      June 30,                     June 30,
                                 ------------------            -----------------
                                  2000        1999              2000       1999
                                 ------      ------            ------     ------
Loss from continuing operations
     before income taxes per
     statement of operations     (14.3)       (3.6)            (31.1)     (13.1)
Add:
Portion of rents representative
     of the interest factor        0.6         0.6               1.2        1.2
Interest on indebtedness and
     amortization of debt expense 12.1         8.6              22.1       19.0
                                 -----       -----             -----      -----
Income as adjusted                (1.6)        5.6              (7.8)       7.1
                                 =====       =====             =====      =====

Fixed Charges:
Interest on indebtedness and
     amortization of debt
     expense (1)                  12.1         8.6              22.1       19.0
                                 -----       -----             -----      -----
Capitalized interest (2)            --          --                --         --
                                 -----       -----             -----      -----
Rents                              1.8         1.8               3.6        3.6
                                 -----       -----             -----      -----
Portion of rents representative
     of the interest factor (3)    0.6         0.6               1.2        1.2
                                 -----       -----             -----      -----
Fixed Charges (1) + (2) + (3)     14.5        11.0              26.9       23.8
                                 =====       =====             =====      =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed
     charges                        --        0.51                --       0.30
                                 =====       =====             =====      =====
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 14, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00901-CV

LOYD LANDON SORROW, SR., Appellant 

V.

HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCIENCE 

CENTER OF HOUSTON, AND MEDICAL DOCTOR SEAL, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 334th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-33383 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed August 24, 2018. The order 

appellant attempts to appeal is an order granting summary judgment and dismissing 

the suit filed against the Harris County Sheriff. The order does not dispose of the 

remaining parties. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not 

dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and 
2

unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. 

Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. 

Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 

On January 24, 2019, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a 

response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before February 4, 

2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On February 7, 2019 appellant filed a response in 

which he argues the merits of the trial court’s partial summary judgment order. 

Appellant’s response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction over the 

appeal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan, and Poissant.
Exhibit 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely in connection with the filing of the Annual Report of
Retractable Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Thomas J.
Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas W. Cowan, Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/ Thomas J. ShawTHOMAS J. SHAWPRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN, ANDCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/s/ Douglas W. CowanDOUGLAS W. COWANCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(logo) DIXON HUGHES GOODMANLLP

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Managers ofC-III Capital Partners LLC, the 

Sole Member of C-III AssetManagement LLC:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria,that C-III Asset Management LLC (the “Company”) complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB for all transactions for which the Companyacted as servicer involving first lien commercial mortgage loans (the“Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, excludingcriteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(1) – 1122(d)(3)(iv),1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), whichmanagement has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by theCompany with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted inaccordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on atest basis, evidence supporting management’s assertion and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Webelieve that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 isfairly stated, in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

 

Asheville, North Carolina

February 6, 2017
# C_2014175EN.01004701.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/47

---

Action brought on 7 March 2014 — ANKO v Commission and REA

(Case T-165/14)

2014/C 175/65

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission and Research Executive Agency (REA)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | Declare that the suspension of payment which was imposed and is maintained by the REA acting under powers delegated to it by the Commission in respect of the amount which the Commission remains liable to pay to the applicant as its portion in respect of the ESS project is a breach of the latter’s contractual obligations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the suspension of payment which was imposed and is maintained by the REA acting under powers delegated to it by the Commission in respect of the amount which the Commission remains liable to pay to the applicant as its portion in respect of the ESS project is a breach of the latter’s contractual obligations;

| — | Declare that the amount of EUR 125 253,82 which the Commission continues not to have paid as its portion in respect of the ESS project constitutes eligible costs and, consequently, the Commission is under an obligation to pay it to ΑΝΚΟ; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the amount of EUR 125 253,82 which the Commission continues not to have paid as its portion in respect of the ESS project constitutes eligible costs and, consequently, the Commission is under an obligation to pay it to ΑΝΚΟ;

| — | Declare that the entire amount of EUR 216 172,68 which the Commission has already paid to the applicant as its portion in respect of the ESS project constitutes eligible costs,·and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the entire amount of EUR 216 172,68 which the Commission has already paid to the applicant as its portion in respect of the ESS project constitutes eligible costs,·and

| — | Order the REA and the Commission to pay the applicant’s legal costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the REA and the Commission to pay the applicant’s legal costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action concerns the liability of the REA and the Commission under the contract No 217 951 for the performance of the ESS project, under Article 272 TFEU.

In particular, the applicant maintains that the REA, acting under powers delegated to it by the Commission, without any justification and in the breach of the ESS project agreement, suspended payment to ΑΝΚΟ. Further, the applicant maintains that the Commission, by seeking to apply the ‘extrapolation’ method, disputed, without any legal basis and in breach of both the agreement and of applicable law, the eligibility of almost the whole of the costs declared by ΑΝΚΟ in respect of the ESS project.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8


                                                   February 4, 2003



Mr. Samir G. Gibara
309 Lake Pointe Drive
Akron, OH 44333

Dear Sam:

The purpose of this letter is to set forth the terms of your retention as a
consultant to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company ("Goodyear"), as agreed by the
Directors of Goodyear.

You agree that, upon my request but subject to your reasonable availability, you
will provide assistance and advice to me and other executives of Goodyear
regarding such matters as I may designate. The term of this arrangement shall be
from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, unless sooner terminated for any
reason by you or by Goodyear. In consideration of your services, Goodyear will
pay you a total of $180,000, payable in equal monthly installments on the last
day of each month, plus travel and other expenses, if any. Goodyear will pay you
for your expenses promptly upon receipt of any invoice. In addition, Goodyear
will provide you with the following:

     -    office space in Goodyear's headquarters
     -    security access to Goodyear facilities
     -    secretarial assistance
     -    garage parking
     -    business use of Goodyear aircraft
     -    home security
     -    personal financial planning services
     -    executive physical at Cleveland Clinic

provided that the cost of home security and the executive physical will be
billed to you personally by Goodyear.



<PAGE>


Mr. Samir G. Gibara
Page 2
February 4, 2003



The responsibilities you are undertaking hereunder are in addition to your
responsibilities as a non-employee Director of Goodyear and as Chairman of the
Board of Directors; and the fees and benefits payable hereunder are in addition
to the normal fees and benefits you are entitled to as a non-employee director
of Goodyear.

You agree to treat as confidential, and not to disclose to others, any and all
information pertaining to Goodyear's business which is not available to the
public generally.

We agree that you are acting as an independent contractor and shall not for any
purpose be deemed an employee of Goodyear or be entitled to any of the benefits
normally granted to Goodyear employees, except for those benefits expressly set
forth in the second paragraph of this letter.

You also understand and agree that you will be solely responsible for compliance
with applicable federal, state and local income and other taxes on amounts and
benefits paid pursuant to this letter agreement.

If this letter accurately defines our agreement and if it is acceptable to you,
please sign the enclosed copy and return it to me. Thank you.

                                                   Very truly yours,

                                                   /s/ Robert J. Keegan


RJK:ll




AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:



Signed: /s/ Samir G. Gibara
       --------------------



Date: March 24, 2003
<PAGE>
                                EXHIBIT 10.22(B)

                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF
                                  GLEN S. DAVIS

      This Second Amendment is made on the 5th day of September 2002 to the
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated May 12, 1998(and as amended on November 12, 2001)
between ADDISON STEEL, INC., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), SCHUFF
INTERNATIONAL, INC. (fka Schuff Steel Company), a Delaware corporation (the
"Parent"), and GLEN S. DAVIS, an individual ("Executive").

                                    RECITALS

      The parties desire to enter a SECOND AMENDMENT of the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

      NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements,
representations, and warranties contained herein and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties agree as follows:

      1.    That under Paragraph 6 of the Employment Agreement, Executive is
            entitled to receive ownership of certain life insurance policies and
            related premiums at the earlier of May 13, 2003 or termination of
            his employment. Executive shall, at his option, receive at an
            earlier date designated in writing by the Executive with five (5)
            day written notice to the Parent and Company: a) the ownership of
            the Sun Life of Canada term insurance policy (#111102037) and
            universal life policy (#020044694); and b) the related pre-payment
            of insurance premiums of $98,034 (which is $16,339 yearly for six
            (6) years).

      Except as specifically amended herein, the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT remains in
full force and effect.

      In witness whereof, the parties have executed this SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT of the date written above.


SCHUFF INTERNATIONAL, INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------
By:  /s/ Scott A. Schuff
   -----------------------------------------
Printed Name:  Scott A. Schuff

ADDISON STEEL, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION
------------------------------------------
By:  /s/ Dean A. Campbell
   ---------------------------------
Printed Name:  Dean A. Campbell, VP

By:  /s/ Glen S. Davis
   -----------------------------------------
         GLEN S. DAVIS
# C_2014261EN.01002402.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/24

---

Action brought on 7 May 2014 — Klement/OHIM — Bullerjan (Form of an oven)

(Case T-317/14)

2014/C 261/47

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Toni Klement (Dippoldiswalde, Germany) (represented by: J. Weiser, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bullerjan GmbH (Isernhagen-Kirchhorst, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 27 February 2014 in Case R 1656/2013-1 so that the appeal brought by the applicant is upheld and Community trade mark 4 0 87  731 is revoked in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 27 February 2014 in Case R 1656/2013-1 so that the appeal brought by the applicant is upheld and Community trade mark 4 0 87  731 is revoked in its entirety;

| — | Alternatively, annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alternatively, annul the contested decision;

| — | Order OHIM and, as the case may be, the Community trade mark proprietor/possible intervener to pay the costs for these proceedings and of the proceedings before OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM and, as the case may be, the Community trade mark proprietor/possible intervener to pay the costs for these proceedings and of the proceedings before OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: Three-dimensional mark representing an oven, for goods in Class 11 — Community trade mark registration No 4 0 87  731

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Bullerjan GmbH

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for revocation

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 15 of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 15.1   LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Board of Directors and Shareholders
STERIS Corporation

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and related Prospectuses of our report dated July 17, 2000, relating
to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of STERIS Corporation
and Subsidiaries that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2000:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Registration
   Number                                Description                              Filing Date
------------    ----------------------------------------------------------   -----------------
<C>             <S>                                                          <C>
 333-40082      Form S-8 Registration Statement --Nonqualified Stock         June 26, 2000
                Option Agreement between STERIS Corporation and Laurie
                Brlas and the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
                between STERIS Corporation and David L. Crandall

 333-40058      Form S-8 Registration Statement --Nonqualified Stock         June 23, 2000
                Option Agreement between STERIS Corporation and
                Les C. Vinney

 333-65155      Form S-8 Registration Statement -- STERIS Corporation        October 1, 1998
                Long Term Incentive Stock Plan

 333-55839      Form S-8 Registration Statement -- Nonqualified Stock        June 2, 1998
                Option Agreement between STERIS Corporation and John
                Masefield and the Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
                between STERIS Corporation and Thomas J. DeAngelo

 333-32005      Form S-8 Registration Statement -- STERIS Corporation        July 24, 1997
                1997 Stock Option Plan

 333-06529      Form S-3 Registration Statement -- STERIS Corporation        June 21, 1996

 333-01610      Post-effective Amendment to Form S-4 on Form S-8 --          May 16, 1996
                STERIS Corporation

  33-91444      Form S-8 Registration Statement -- STERIS Corporation        April 24, 1995
                1994 Equity Compensation Plan

  33-91442      Form S-8 Registration Statement -- STERIS Corporation        April 24, 1995
                1994 Nonemployee Directors Equity Compensation Plan

  33-55976      Form S-8 Registration Statement -- STERIS Corporation        December 21, 1992
                401(k)Plan

  33-55258      Form S-8 Registration Statement -- STERIS Corporation        December 4, 1992
                Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan
</TABLE>


                                      /s/  Ernst & Young LLP


Cleveland, Ohio
August 10, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
  FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND THE
  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 
  SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                    43,642 
<SECURITIES>                               4,000
<RECEIVABLES>                             61,459
<ALLOWANCES>                              (7,397)
<INVENTORY>                               50,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         184,912
<PP&E>                                   115,890
<DEPRECIATION>                            75,502 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           235,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     44,891
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      22
<OTHER-SE>                               187,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             235,611
<SALES>                                  261,043 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         261,043
<CGS>                                    213,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            213,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          23,012      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (24,065)
<INCOME-TAX>                             (10,847)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (13,218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (13,218)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.59)
        

</TABLE>