FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT DE CEMB ER 9, 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NOT P UB L I S H] I N TH E U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 13666 N on - A r gu m e n t C al e n d ar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 04 -005 06 -C V -C B -L L E A N N B R O W N , P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s J O A N N E B . B A RN H A R T , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A p p ealfr om th e U n i te d S tate s D i st ri ctC ou rt f o r t h e S o u t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Al a b a ma

_________________________ ( D e c e m b e r 9, 2005) B efo re B L A C K , M A R C U S a n d W IL S O N , C i rcu i t J u d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

L e a nn B r ow n appe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de ra f f i rm i ng the C om m i s s i one r ’ s de ni a l of he rappl i c a t i on f

ordi s abi l i tyi ns ur a nc e be ne f i t s , 42 U .S .C . § 4 0 5 ( g ) , a n d s u p p le m e n ta l s e c u r ityin c o m e , 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 3 9 3 ( c ) ( 3 ) . B row n ass ert s the A dm i ni stra t i ve L aw Judg e ( A L J) erre d b y f ai l i ng t o con si der h e rs u b je c tiv e c o m p la in ts o f

p a in a n da ll o f

h e rim p a irm e n ts in c o m b in a tio n . W e a f f irm th e C o m m is s io n e r ’s d e n ia l o f b e n e f its . W e r ev iew a s o cial se cu rity ca se to d eter m in e w h eth erth e C o m m issio n er ’s deci si on i s s up po rt ed by subst ant i al evi dence and w hether the corre ctl egal s ta n d a r d s w e r e ap p lie d . L e w is v . Cal lahan , 1 2 5 F .3 d1 4 3 6 , 1 4 3 9 ( 1 1 th C ir . 1 9 9 7 ) . W e r e qui r e ac l a i m a ntw ho s e e ks “ t o e s t abl i s h adi s abi l i tyba s e d on t e s t i m onyof pai n and other s ym pt om s” t o sho w : “ (1) e vi dence of an und er l yi ng m edi ca l c ondi t i on; a nd ( 2) e i the r( a ) obj e c t i ve m e di c a l e vi de nc e c onf i rm i ng the s e ve r i tyof the al l eged pai n; or (b) thatthe obj ec t i vel y det erm i ned m edi ca l cond i t i on can re as on abl y be e xp ec t ed t o g i ve ri se t o the cl ai m ed pai n. ” W i l so n v. B a rn h a rt , 284 F . 3d 1219, 1225 ( 11th C i r . 2002) . F urthe rm or e , “ c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i ons a r e the prov i nce of the A L J. ” Mo o re v. B a rn h a rt , 4 0 5 F .3 d1 2 0 8 , 1 2 1 2 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . W e d o n o t r e q u ir e th e A L Jto “s p e c if ic a llyr e f e rto e v e ryp ie c e o f

e v id e n c e in h is de c i s i on, ” s o l ong a s the de c i s i on i s s uf f i c i e ntt o a l l ow thi s C ourtt o c onc l ude the3

A L Jc o n s id e r e d th e c la im a n t’s m e d ic a l c o n d itio n a s aw h o le . D yer v. B a rn h a rt , 3 9 5 F .3 d1 2 0 6 , 1 2 1 1 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . S u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e s u p p o rts th e A L J ’s c o n c lu s io n th a t B r o w n f a ile dto show ob j ec t i ve m edi ca l evi dence confi rm i ng the se veri ty of heral l eged pai n o r that a nyobj e c t i ve l yde t e rm i ne d m e di c a l c ondi t i on c a n r e a s onabl ybe e xpe c t e d t o gi ve ri se t o the cl ai m ed pai n. A l tho ug h B row n p er i od i ca l l y c om pl ai ned o f pai n t o h er tr e a tin g p h y s ic ia n , th e m e d ic a l e v id e n c e s h o w e ds h e w a s ab le to w a lk in d e p e n d e n tly , e v e n a t as lig h t g r a d e , a n dlif t u p to 2 5 p o u n d s ab o v e h e rh e a d . W he n B r ow n s a w D r . C r om pt on on F e brua ry27, 2001, D r . C r om pt on not e d s he h a dam ildlim p b u t w a s “d e f in ite lyim p r o v in g .” W h ile B r o w n c o m p la in e do f p a in i n he rr i ghts houl de r , D r . B r oc ki ngt on, w ho r e pe a t e dl ye xa m i ne d B r ow n’ s r i ght shou l der, no t ed B row n’ s s ho ul der s ho w ed “ si gn i fi canti m prov em ent . ” Fu rth e rmo r e , a c c o r d i n g t o Br o w n ’ s o w n t e s t i mo n y , s h e w a s ab l e t o p e r f o rm a v a r ie tyo f

d a ilya c tiv itie s , in c lu d in g s o m e h o u s e w o rka n dg r o c e rys h o p p in g w ith a s s is ta n c e . S h e a ls o c o n tin u e d to d r iv e . I n s u m , th e r e is s u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e to supp ortthe A L J’ s f

i nd i ng thatB row n h ad no tes t abl i shed a di sabi l i ty bas ed on her s ubj e c t i ve t e s t i m onyof

pa i n. B row n n extar gu es the A L J di d n otconsi der the com bi ned effe ctof her th y r o id itis , c a rp a l tu n n e l s y n d r o m e , te n d o n itis o f h e rr ig h t s h o u ld e r , tr au m a tic4

ca l ci fi ca t i on of her r i gh thi p, and adj ustm entdi sorder , w hen m aki ng hi s r es i du al f unc t i ona l c apa c i tyde t e rm i na t i on. B r ow n f a i l e d t o r a i s e thi s a r gum e ntbe f or e the d is tr ic t c o u rt. T h e r e f

o r e , w e d o n o t n e e dto c o n s id e rth is c la im . Kel leyv. Apf el , 1 8 5 F .3 d1 2 1 1 , 1 2 1 5 ( 1 1 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ) . S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the A L J ’ s c onc l us i on tha tB r ow n w a s not di s abl e d due t o he rc om pl a i nt s of pa i n. W e a f

f i rm the C om m i s s i one r ’ s de ni a l of b en efi t s. AF F I RME D.