alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, March 22, 2010, 8 a.m.to 
March 23, 2010, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on February 24, 2010, 75 FR 8371-8372.
    The meeting will be held March 29, 2010 to March 30, 2010. The 
meeting time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: February 26, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4589 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 73
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 73 appear at 66 FR 66742, Dec. 27, 2001.

§ 73.3125 Iron oxides. ( a ) *Identity and specifications.* The color additive iron oxides (CAS Reg. No. 1332-37-2), Color Index No. 77491, shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 73.2250 (a) and (b).
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* ( 1 ) The substance listed in paragraph (a) of this section may be used as a color additive in contact lenses in amounts not to exceed the minimum reasonably required to accomplish the intended coloring effect.
( 2 ) Authorization and compliance with this use shall not be construed as waiving any of the requirements of sections 510(k), 515, and 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the contact lens in which the additive is used.
( c ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Exemption from certification.* Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore the color additive is exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[51 FR 24816, July 9, 1986, as amended at 69 FR 24511, May 4, 2004]
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Keith J. Burzycki et al.

*Thomas H. Connell,*in support of the petition.

Submitted February 17

decided March 25, 1969

The petition by the defendants for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK T. STORMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 622 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3850 Gutta percha. ( a ) *Identification.* Gutta percha is a device made from coagulated sap of certain tropical trees intended to fill the root canal of a tooth. The gutta percha is softened by heat and inserted into the root canal, where it hardens as it cools.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 13830, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38798, July 25, 2001]
#### § 822.33 How long must we keep the records?

You, the designated person, and your investigators must keep all records for a period of 2 years after we have accepted your final report, unless we specify otherwise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENTS OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,015,070
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,433,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,806,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,433,410
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               480,302
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,557
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (500,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 74.2255 D&C Orange No. 5. ( a ) *Identity and specifications.* The color additive D&C Orange No. 5 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 74.1255 (a)(1) and (b).
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* D&C Orange No. 5 may be safely used for coloring mouthwashes and dentifrices that are ingested cosmetics in amounts consistent with current good manufacturing practice. D&C Orange No. 5 may be safely used for coloring lipsticks and other cosmetics intended to be applied to the lips in amounts not exceeding 5.0 percent by weight of the finished cosmetic products. D&C Orange No. 5 may be safely used for coloring externally applied cosmetics in amounts consistent with current good manufacturing practice.
( c ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Certification.* All batches of D&C Orange No. 5 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
[47 FR 49635, Nov. 2, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 13342, Apr. 4, 1984]
p. 1


# OAR Box 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 52 ) ll-B-27 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/20089:50:53 AM Sheet 52 of 276P. 2

The Administrativ e Recordnote dtha t thi s ite mwa s fro

ma memorandu

m fro mSall yFarrel , EPA , SSCD t o file : Por t Washingto n Facilities ; Cos t o f Renovatio nWork a t Affecte d Facilities . No dat e wa s given .P. 3

r J . 

# \§^^m ti'40'Oi, JT-B'Q.7

Por t Washingto nFacilities; ! ColsjfcioiHReriovatio nWor k a t th e Affecte dFacilitie s
Tabl e 1 . Compariso no f Update dCost s o f Adjuste d Basi s

t o Annua l and Tota l Renovatio nCost s (Rounde dt o Thousand$ ) Uni t No . 1 2 3 4 5% * o f Adjuste d UPDATE D Basi s 2,35 2 1,73 2 1,70 3 1,92 1 Highes t

Annua l Cos t o f Renovatio n 2,16 5 1,70 0 1,70 0 1,79 8 ' 5 % O f

Basi s Exceeded ?
n o n o n o n o Tota l

Cos t o f Renovatio n 3,57 7 7,40 7 7,06 5 6,25 2 5 % o f

Basi s Exceeded ? ye s ye s ye s ye s

Tabl e 2 . Compariso no f Origina l Cost s o f Adjuste dBasi s t o

Annua l an

d Tota l Renovatio nCost s (Roundedt o Thousand $ ) Uni t 5 % o f Adjuste d No . ORIGINAL Basi s
1 2 3 4 16 9

14 9 21 2 25 1 Highes t

Annua l Cos t o f Renovatio n 2,16 5 1,70 0 1,70 0 1,79 8 5 % O f

Basi s Exceeded ? ye s ye s ye s ye s Tota l

Cos t o f Renovatio n 3,57 7 7,40 7 7,06 5 6,25 2 5 % O f

Basi s Exceeded ? ye s ye s ye s ye s

Adjuste d cost s includ e th e cos t o f additions , reflec t retirements , and ar e exclusiv e o f depreciation . 5 % i s th e annua l asse t repai r allowanc e percentag e fo r electri c utilit ystea m generating units .
#### Dorothy Reed *v.*Bernard Shapiro, State Welfare Commissioner

*Roger E. Koonts,*in support of the petition.

*Richard E. Rapuano,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Submitted January 22

decided December 3, 1968

The petition by the plaintiff for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
# C_2016027EN.01004802.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 December 2015 — Information Resources v OHIM (Growth Delivered)

(Case T-528/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Growth Delivered - Mark consisting of an advertising slogan - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 027/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Information Resources, Inc. (Chicago, Illinois, United States) (represented by: C. Schulte, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 May 2014 (Case R 1777/2013-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Growth Delivered as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Information Resources, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Information Resources, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,949,478
<SECURITIES>                                22,046,671
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,886,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (589,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     91,522
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               584,553
<PP&E>                                       4,320,369
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,942,026)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,348,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,724,455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,574
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,499,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,348,269
<SALES>                                     13,080,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,080,096
<CGS>                                        9,774,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,774,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,120,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,951,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    93,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,044,635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.86)


</TABLE>
August 2002 Extension of Loan and Security Agreement



EXHIBIT 10.25 
 

	 Mr. Edmond Tseng 
	 August 13, 2002 


OSE USA, Inc. 
2221 Old Oakland Road 
San Jose, CA 95131-1402 
 
OSE, Inc.

2221 Old Oakland Road 
San Jose,
CA 95131.;1402 

	RE:	 	Asset Based Line of Credit 

Loan #42592-35665 
 
Dear Edmond, 
 
Far East National Bank is pleased1o inform you that $15MM syndication
commercial revolving line of credit for OSE USA, Inc./OSE; Inc. has been extended from August 15; 2002 to February 15, 2003. 
 
Based on the extension, the $15MM commercial line of credit is co-lead by Bank SjnoPac and Far East National Bank. FENB will act as Servicing Agent and
Bank SinoPac as Administrative Agent. 
 
Should you have any
questions or comments on this arrangement, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. 
 

	 FAR EAST NATIONAL BANK

	
	 By:
	 	

	 	 	 Charles Tzeng, FVP
Blueprint





  Exhibit 10.1







 


 



FIRST AMENDMENT



TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER


 


This
First Amendment, dated as of May 9, 2017 (the “Amendment”), to the
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 13, 2017 by and among
the “Parties” (as defined below) (the
“Agreement”), is entered
into by and among KeyStone Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), Novume
Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company (“Novume”), KeyStone Merger
Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Novume (“Company
Merger Sub”), Brekford Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novume
(“Brekford Merger
Sub”), and Brekford Corp., a Delaware corporation
(“Brekford” and, together
with the Company, Novume, Company Merger Sub and Brekford Merger
Sub, each a “Party” and collectively
the “Parties”). Except as
otherwise set forth herein, all capitalized terms used herein and
not specifically defined shall have the same meanings as ascribed
to them in the Agreement. The Parties hereby agree as
follows:


 


As
permitted under Section 9.1(b) and Section 9.3 of the Agreement,
the Parties hereto mutually agree that the Termination Date is
extended until July 31, 2017, or such other date as the Parties may
agree in writing. All reference in the Agreement to the Termination
Date shall mean July 31, 2017, or such other date as the Parties
may otherwise agree in writing.


 


The
provisions of Sections 10.2, 10.9 and 10.10 of the Agreement are
incorporated herein by reference.


 


Except
as specifically and expressly set forth above, all other terms and
conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and
effect.


 


 




 








 






 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment
to be executed by their respective officers hereunto duly
authorized, all as of the date first written above.

 


	

 



KeyStone Solutions, Inc.,


a
Delaware corporation


 


	

 


/s/
Robert A. Berman







	
Name:
 
Robert
A. Berman


	
Title:
 
Chief
Executive Officer







 


	

 



Brekford Corp.,


a
Delaware corporation


 

	
 


	
/s/
Rodney W. Hillman  


	
Name:
 
Rodney
W. Hillman  


	
Title:
President and
COO  


	
 

	
 

	
 


	

 



Novume Solutions, Inc.,


a
Delaware corporation


 


	

/s/
Robert A. Berman


	
Name:
 
 
Robert
A. Berman







	
Title:
 
Chief
Executive Officer







 


	

 



KeyStone Merger Sub, Inc.,


a
Delaware corporation


 


	

/s/
Robert A. Berman







	
Name:
 
Robert
A. Berman


	
Title:
 
President


	

 


 



Brekford Merger Sub, Inc.,


a
Delaware corporation


 


	

/s/
Robert A. Berman







	
Name:
 
Robert
A. Berman


	
Title:
 
President






 


 





[Signature page to Amendment]
<PAGE>   1

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K
                                 CURRENT REPORT


                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) October 06, 1998

                              THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    British Columbia, Canada                 0-18429                      98-0121376
    ------------------------                 -------                      ----------
<S>                                  <C>                         <C>
(State or other jurisdiction of      (Commission File Number)    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
         incorporation)
</TABLE>



4126 Norland Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia                         V5G 3S8
----------------------------------------------                         -------
  (Address of principal executive offices)                            (zip code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code      604-299-9321
                                                        ------------


                                            N/A
                                            ------------------------------------
                (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




                                                      Exhibit Index is on page 3
                                                                     Page 1 of 5



<PAGE>   2

ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

Pursuant to Form 8-K, General Instructions F, registrant hereby incorporates by
reference the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.


ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

        Exhibit No.    Description

        Exhibit 99     The Loewen Group Inc. Press Release dated October 6, 1998


                                   SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated: October 6, 1998

                                        THE LOEWEN GROUP INC.



                                        By: /s/ BRAD D. STAM
                                            ------------------------------- 
                                        Name: Brad D. Stam
                                        Title:   Senior Vice President, Law



<PAGE>   3

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Sequential
Number   Exhibit                                                     Page Number
------   -------                                                     -----------
<S>      <C>                                                         <C>
99       The Loewen Group Inc.                                                 4
         Press Release dated October 6, 1998
</TABLE>
Page 1 

### Notes from Call with Nalco on September 10, 2014

On Wednesday, September 10, 2014, ERG contacted Nalco to discuss data comparing the

mercury removal performance using Nalmet Nalco 1689 to the use of TMT

‐ 15 (see DCNs SE05148 and

SE05149). ERG discussed the performance data with Peter TenEyck of Nalco.

Regarding DCN SE05148 and SE05148.A1, ERG received the following information from Nalco:

 The data were collected using wastewater from [Redacted].

 The actual data file is considered CBI.

 Nalco 8130 is a ferric coagulant (i.e., a ferric blend).

 Nalco 7766+ is an anionic emulsion polymer.

 Nalco 71301 is a cationic polymer.

 The jar tests were all conducted starting from the same batch of a 5

‐ gallon sample.

 While the raw wastewater results are not available, comparison to “Jar 23” would provide the

best basis for the removals achieved by the chemical additions.

 Nalco is not certain why data for certain jars are missing (e.g., 2, 3, 6).

 For the comparison of results between Nalmet 1689 and TMT

‐ 15, the following jars could be

compared:

o Jar 11 vs. Jar 19

o Jar 12 vs. Jar 20

o Jar 18 vs. Jar 22

Regarding DCN SE05149 and SE05149.A1, ERG received the following information from Nalco:

 The data were collected using wastewater from [Redacted].

 The actual data file is considered CBI, however, the chemicals, dosages, and effluent

concentrations could be provided in a redacted version of the file.

 Nalco confirmed that all samples started with the same raw wastewater from July 9, 2009.

 For the comparison of results between Nalmet 1689 and TMT

‐ 15, the following samples could

be compared:

o Samples 1

‐ 4 vs. Samples 5

‐ 8 (e.g., 1 vs. 5, 2 vs. 6)

o Samples 17

‐ 20 vs. Samples 25

‐ 28 (e.g., 17 vs. 25, 18 vs. 26)

ERG asked Mr. TenEyck if he could provide ERG with the cost of Nalmet 1689 to refine its cost estimates

for the ELGs and Mr. TenEyck directed ERG to discuss the costs with Dan Cicero. On Wednesday,

October 1, 2014, ERG contacted Mr. Cicero to obtain the estimated costs for Nalmet 1689. Mr. Cicero

stated that the costs vary by customer depending on the quantity ordered and the specificationPage 2 requested. ERG noted that they are looking for an average cost that would be reasonable for a national

estimate. Mr. Cicero provided ERG with the following cost estimate and additional information:

 The general dosage for the chemical would be [Redacted].

 An average cost for the chemical would be [Redacted]/pound (not including freight costs).

 The density of the product ranges from [Redacted] and the average value of [Redacted] could be

used in the estimates.