alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3680 *Sporothrix schenckii* serological reagents. ( a ) *Identification. Sporothrix schenckii* serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to *Sporothrix schenckii* in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of sporothrichosis caused by a fungus belonging to the genus *Sporothrix* and provides epidemiological information on this disease. Sporothrichosis is a chronic tumorlike infection primarily of the skin.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 65 FR 2312, Jan. 14, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1040 Aldolase test system. ( a ) *Identification.* An aldolase test system is a device intended to measure the activity of the enzyme aldolase in serum or plasma. Aldolase measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of the early stages of acute hepatitis and for certain muscle diseases such as progressive Duchenne-type muscular dystrophy.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2305, Jan. 14, 2000]
# C_2017178EN.01003302.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/33

---

Order of the General Court of 28 February 2017 — MPF Holdings v Commission

(Case T-788/14) (1)

1

(2017/C 178/49)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AVITAR'S
ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                         43,517
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  596,430
<ALLOWANCES>                   9,000
<INVENTORY>                    213,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               917,156
<PP&E>                         416,540
<DEPRECIATION>                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 6,050,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          1,549,931
<BONDS>                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    12,752
<COMMON>                       81,581
<OTHER-SE>                     4,150,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   6,050,476
<SALES>                        628,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               628,743
<CGS>                          551,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  1,387,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             24,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (782,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                   2,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (786,039)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                   (786,039)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (.10)
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.3580 Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) test system is a device intended to measure lysergic acid diethylamide, a hallucinogenic drug, in serum, urine, and gastric contents. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of LSD use or overdose.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). A lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 84 FR 71798, Dec. 30, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.2910 Clinical electronic thermometer. ( a ) *Identification.* A clinical electronic thermometer is a device used to measure the body temperature of a patient by means of a transducer coupled with an electronic signal amplification, conditioning, and display unit. The transducer may be in a detachable probe with or without a disposable cover.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
### T TE C 

## 2011J 

## 6
DOCKET 0.: 

### -0 -201J

### -002

R sp 

### nd nt 

## RA ) ) 

### ) ) ) ) ) 

### FI IN



### nJuo 1- 01 

### ,tb Partie til d 

### .oJ inL Li 

### nd dminislrali 

### rnpl int rlain paragT 

### ph f 

### th 1 lh t 

### Labl in th 

### pp ndi •b 1chang . Th 

### nd up 1 d t Ilh currenL 

### .....,J.,.,.,.lL:JD to comply °th 

### all ofth term ofth imrncdiu1 

### Iy up n r 'ceipt 

### y R sp nd nL 

### f titi 

### Am nd I n n1 Agr m ot and Final Ord r.


### ,2012

ffi r --1-.:."'--

__

### Da of »YLl 

### U-CERTlFlCATE OF SERVICE 

### The undersigned certifies that theoriginal ofthe 

### attached ORDER GRANTING MOTlON TO AMENI> CONSENT AGREEMENT ANI> FINAL ORI>ER in the matter of MARATHON OIL COMPANY; I>OCKET NO.: CAA-08-20J 1-0025, was filed with the Regional Hearing Clerk on June 18,20I2. Further, the undersigned certifies thut a

### Irue and correct copy ofthe document was 

### delivered to David Rochlin, Senior EnforcementAttorney, U. S. EPA - Region 8.1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-1129. True and correct copies ofthe 

### aforementioned document was placed in the United States mail on June 18,2012, to Rebecca K. Skiba, SeniorAttorney 

### Marathon Oil Company 5555 San Felipe Houston, Texas 77056

June 18,2012 

# "Ltc(J

# <loAm

# ;4/ Tina ArtemiS .., Paralegal/Regional Hearing Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6572
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus YOLANDA VIOLA BURGESS, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 06-6859
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus YOLANDA VIOLA BURGESS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00162-LMB-1)- 2 - Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 27, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yolanda Viola Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly A. Riley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Yolanda Viola Burgess appeals the district courts orders denying relief on her writs of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess , No. 1:00-cr-00162-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2006; Apr. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Cynthia Dudzinski, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street, NW., room 6077, Washington, DC 20006-8521. Telephone: (202) 502-7589 or by e-mail:                         *cynthia.dudzinski@ed.gov.*

If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.

## VIII. Other Information

*Accessible Format:*                         Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed under                         **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                         in Section VII of this notice.                    

*Electronic Access to This Document:*                         You can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the                         **Federal Register,**                         in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF), on the Internet at the following site:                         *http://www.ed.gov/​news/​fedregister.*

To use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site.

# Note:

                            The official version of this document is the document published in the                             **Federal Register.**                             Free Internet access to the official edition of the                             **Federal Register**                             and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at:                             *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html.*

*Delegation of Authority:*                         The Secretary of Education has delegated authority to Daniel T. Madzelan, Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis for the Office of Postsecondary Education, to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.                    

Dated: March 2, 2010.

Daniel T. Madzelan,

Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis.

[FR Doc. 2010-4766 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00439

- CR

Enrique GARCIA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CRM

- 001083

- D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 12, 2019.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.5820 Therapeutic scrotal support. ( a ) *Identification.* A therapeutic scrotal support is a device intended for medical purposes that consist of a pouch attached to an elastic waistband and that is used to support the scrotum (the sac that contains the testicles).
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 880.9. The device also is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[45 FR 69682, Oct. 21, 1980, as amended at 66 FR 38805, July 25, 2001]
§ 807.65 Exemptions for device establishments. The following classes of persons are exempt from registration in accordance with § 807.20 under the provisions of section 510(g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of the act, or because the Commissioner of Food and Drugs has found, under section 510(g)(5) of the act, that such registration is not necessary for the protection of the public health. The exemptions in paragraphs (d), (e), (f), and (i) of this section are limited to those classes of persons located in any State as defined in section 201(a)(1) of the act. ( a ) A manufacturer of raw materials or components to be used in the manufacture or assembly of a device who would otherwise not be required to register under the provisions of this part.
( b ) A manufacturer of devices to be used solely for veterinary purposes.
( c ) A manufacturer of general purpose articles such as chemical reagents or laboratory equipment whose uses are generally known by persons trained in their use and which are not labeled or promoted for medical uses.
( d ) Licensed practitioners, including physicians, dentists, and optometrists, who manufacture or otherwise alter devices solely for use in their practice.
( e ) Pharmacies, surgical supply outlets, or other similar retail establishments making final delivery or sale to the ultimate user. This exemption also applies to a pharmacy or other similar retail establishment that purchases a device for subsequent distribution under its own name, e.g., a properly labeled health aid such as an elastic bandage or crutch, indicating “distributed by” or “manufactured for” followed by the name of the pharmacy.
( f ) Persons who manufacture, prepare, propagate, compound, or process devices solely for use in research, teaching, or analysis and do not introduce such devices into commercial distribution.
( g ) [Reserved]
( h ) Carriers by reason of their receipt, carriage, holding or delivery of devices in the usual course of business as carriers.
( i ) Persons who dispense devices to the ultimate consumer or whose major responsibility is to render a service necessary to provide the consumer (i.e., patient, physician, layman, etc.) with a device or the benefits to be derived from the use of a device; for example, a hearing aid dispenser, optician, clinical laboratory, assembler of diagnostic x-ray systems, and personnel from a hospital, clinic, dental laboratory, orthotic or prosthetic retail facility, whose primary responsibility to the ultimate consumer is to dispense or provide a service through the use of a previously manufactured device.
[42 FR 42526, Aug. 23, 1977, as amended at 58 FR 46523, Sept. 1, 1993; 61 FR 44615, Aug. 28, 1996; 65 FR 17136, Mar. 31, 2000; 66 FR 59160, Nov. 27, 2001]
#### Wright et al. *v.*Hines et al.

[No. 17,396.

Filed October 11, 1945.]

*151
      *Walter G. Todd,*and *Milton E. Craig,*both of Indianapolis, and *Archie J. Kahl,*of Danville, for appellants.

*Adney*and *Adney,*of Lebanon, *Hume*and *Gaston,*of Danville, and *Harding and Harding,*of Crawfordsville, for appellees.

Royse, C. J.

In this case the transcript was filed and cause submitted on June 18,1945. On July 18, 1945, the appellants were granted an extension of time to and including September 18, 1945, in which to file their brief. On September 18, 1945, appellants filed their brief with the clerk of this court and on said last mentioned date mailed from Indianapolis to the attorneys of appellees at Crawfordsville, Indiana, notice of the filing of their brief and a ribbon copy thereof. This notice was received by appellees’ attorneys' on September 19, 1945.

Appellees have filed their motion to dismiss this appeal for the reason that appellants have failed to comply with the rules of the Supreme Court. Rule 2-19, Rules of the Supreme Court (1943 Revision) provides, in part, as follows:

> “Nine copies of each brief shall be filed, together with proof of service of a copy upon the opposing party or his counsel. ... If the brief is typewritten a ribbon copy shall be served on opposing counsel or party and not less than two ribbon copies shall be filed.”

Rule 2-13 requires the appellant to serve upon the appellee copy of his brief within the time allowed for filing such brief. The mailing of such brief to appellees’ attorneys on the last day of filing is not a compliance with this rule unless the brief is received by them on said day. *James C. Curtis & Co.*v. *Emmerling*(1941), *152218 Ind. 172, 31 N. E. (2d) 57, 986; *Gary Railways Co.*v. *Kleinknigkt*(1941), 110 Ind. App. 72, 36 N. E. (2d) 939; *Reasor*v. *Reasor*(1945), 115 Ind. App. 535, 60 N. E. (2d) 536.

The appellees’ motion to dismiss must be sustained and this appeal is dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 62 N. E. (2d) 884.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 80
          - [WT Docket No. 04-257 and RM-10743; FCC 10-6]

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241), a document in the Maritime Radio Services, WT Docket No. 04-257, which included a Final Rules Appendix that reflected the amended adoption of a certain rule. This document corrects the amendment of that section as set forth below.                    

# DATES:

March 9, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stana Kimball, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at                         *Stanislava.Kimball@FCC.gov*                         or at (202) 418-1306, or TTY (202) 418-7233.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Communications Commission published a document in the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241) to ensure that its rules governing the Maritime Radio Services continue to promote maritime safety, maximize effective and efficient use of the spectrum available for maritime communications, accommodate technological innovation, avoid unnecessary regulatory burdens, and maintain consistency with international maritime standards to the extent consistent with the United States public interest. This document corrects a rule amendment set forth in the document published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241).                

In rule FR Doc. 2010-2095 published on February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5241), make the following correction:

§ 80.385 

On page 5241, in the third column, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:

“(a) * * *

(1) The Automated Maritime Communications System (AMTS) is an automated maritime telecommunications system.”

      ( print page 10693)    
Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-4603 Filed 3-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00379-CV

MARGARET ELAINE WALKER,

Appellant

v.

GUADALUPE VASQUEZ, SR., INDIVIDUALLY, 

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE 

OF SILVIA VASQUEZ, DECEASED, GUADALUPE 

VASQUEZ, JR., VERONICA VASQUEZ, BLANCA 

VASQUEZ AND ROGELIO VASQUEZ,

Appellees

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 82966

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed an agreed motion in which they ask this Court to vacate 

the trial court's judgment, remand the case back to the trial court, and dismiss the 

appeal. The parties have reached an agreement to settle their differences in the 

underlying proceeding.
Walker v. Vasquez Page 2

Because we have no authority to vacate the trial court’s judgment, remand the 

case, and dismiss the appeal, we grant the motion in part. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2); 

43.2. 

The trial court's judgment dated July 20, 2012 is set aside without regard to the 

merits and is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the 

settlement agreement. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

There being no agreement of the parties as to costs, it is further ordered that costs 

of this appeal are taxed against Margaret Elaine Walker. Id. (d).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Set aside and remanded

Opinion delivered and filed November 8, 2012

[CV06]
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C30

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

  

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|