alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- Contact

### Some structural features of the Northern Anthracite coal 
basin, Pennsylvania

#### Professional Paper 193-D

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and					   
Notices

U.S. Department of the					   Interior |				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp193D 
                    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact				   Page				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 2012 
00:09:30
# C_2014135EN.01005601.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/56

---

Action brought on 28 February 2014 — Bora Creations v OHIM (gel nails at home)

(Case T-140/14)

2014/C 135/73

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bora Creations, SL (Ceuta, Spain) (represented by R. Lange, G. Hild and E. Schalast, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 December 2013 in Case R 450/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 December 2013 in Case R 450/2013-1;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘gel nails at home’ for goods in Classes 3, 8, 11 and 21 — Community trade mark application No 11 331 634

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration refused

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
§ 876.5830 Hemodialyzer with disposable insert (Kiil type). ( a ) *Identification.* A hemodialyzer with disposable inserts (Kiil type) is a device that is used as a part of an artificial kidney system for the treatment of patients with renal failure or toxemic conditions and that includes disposable inserts consisting of layers of semipermeable membranes which are sandwiched between support plates. The device is used with the extracorporeal blood system and the dialysate delivery system of the hemodialysis system and accessories (§ 876.5820).
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).
[48 FR 53023, Nov. 23, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 11253, Apr. 6, 1988]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ISMAEL CESAR

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 233

[ June 4, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard Bober , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 03

- 004449CF10A

.

Ismael Cesar, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2016326EN.01002302.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 July 2016 — Ogrodnik v EUIPO — Aviário Tropical (Tropical)

(Case T-804/14) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Tropical - Earlier national word mark TROPICAL - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Extent of the applicant’s rights under national law - Coexistence of the marks - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 326/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tadeusz Ogrodnik (Chorzów, Poland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Garrido Otaola, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Aviário Tropical, SA (Loures, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2014 (Case R 1948/2013-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Aviário Tropical and Mr Ogrodnik.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2014 (Case R 1948/2013-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2014 (Case R 1948/2013-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Tadeusz Ogrodnik. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Tadeusz Ogrodnik.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.

1

---
# C_2014292EN.01005501.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/55

---

Action brought on 6 July 2014 — Gas Natural v Commission

(Case T-508/14)

2014/C 292/67

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gas Natural SDG, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: F. Seijo Pérez, R. García Gómez de Zamora and M. Troncoso Ferrer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the contested decision in so far as it orders recovery of the aid; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it orders recovery of the aid; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant contests Commission Decision of 17 July 2013 on the tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements, also known as the Spanish Tax Lease System (State Aid SA.21233 C/2011 (ex NN/2011, ex CP 137/2006))

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Case T-401/14 Duro Felguera v Commission, Case T-700/13 Bankia v Commission and Case T-500/14 Derivados del Flúor v Commission.

Duro Felguera

Commission,

Bankia

Commission

Derivados del Flúor

Commission

The applicant alleges, in particular, infringement of Articles 107 TFEU and 108 TFEU, in that the Commission failed to prove the selective nature of the alleged aid and its effect on trade between Member States; breach of Article 107(1) TFEU and the duty to state reasons, in that the Commission identified the Economic Interest Groupings and their investors as beneficiaries of the alleged aid; infringement of Articles 107 TFEU and 108 TFEU and of the principle that powers must not be misused, in that the contested decision makes a determination as to the validity of clauses in private contracts; and breach of the principle of legal certainty, the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principle of equal treatment; and infringement of Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.

---
# C_2016211EN.01004702.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2016 — Gervais Danone v EUIPO — Mahou (B’lue)

(Case T-803/14) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark B’lue - Earlier EU word mark BLU DE SAN MIGUEL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 211/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie Gervais Danone (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Lakits-Josse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Intervener in the proceedings before the General Court, successor in law to San Miguel, Fabricas de Cerveza y Malta, SA, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Mahou, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Gómez-López, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 September 2014 (Case R 1382/2013-5), relating to opposition proceedings between San Miguel, Fabricas de Cerveza y Malta, SA and Compagnie Gervais Danone.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Compagnie Gervais Danone to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Compagnie Gervais Danone to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 34, 2.2.2015.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on page 2 and 4 of the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          1,603,768
<SECURITIES>                      484,905
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,576,395
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                     1,063,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,144,805
<PP&E>                          4,444,380
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 10,040,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,311,996
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                        7,692,373
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                        569,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   10,040,623
<SALES>                         6,988,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                6,988,134
<CGS>                           4,200,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,200,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,170,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   705,928
<INCOME-TAX>                      282,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               423,557
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      423,557
<EPS-BASIC>                         .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .23

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.3080 Mercury and alloy dispenser. ( a ) *Identification.* A mercury and alloy dispenser is a device with a spring-activated valve intended to measure and dispense into a mixing capsule a predetermined amount of dental mercury in droplet form and a premeasured amount of alloy pellets.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 13830, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38797, July 25, 2001]
George  Speranza
1429  Shore  Parkway
Suite  2K
Brooklyn,  NY,  11214
347-267-0118  Phone
email:  GeorgeSperanza@aol.com


Business  Consulting  Contract

TERM:  6  months

Client  Company:  Go  Online  Networks  Corporation  ("GONT"  OTC  BB)

1.     SCOPE  OF  SERVICES  PROVIDED

Management  Consulting/Marketing/  Business  Development/
Legal,  Accounting  and  Regulatory  Affairs

a.  Assessment of current management structure and operational responsibilities.
Establishment  of  growth  initiatives  and  future  operational  plan.

b.  Complete  product market assessment including competitive analysis, industry
growth  potential,  product  diversification,  existing  market penetration, and
alternative  market  potential.

c.  Creation and implementation of sales and marketing plan including personnel,
budgeting,  Internet  strategies,  identifying new markets; domestic and abroad.

d.  Locating  and  negotiating  with  potential business partners to develop new
opportunities  to  enhance  sales  for  the  company.

e.  Assessment  of  current  legal,  accounting and regulatory issues facing the
company. Implementation of cost effective strategies to effectively manage these
core  areas  of  corporate  operations.

Mergers  and  Acquisitions
Identifying  qualified  candidates.  Conducting  appropriate  due  diligence
investigation.  Negotiating  financial  terms.  Assembling  outside professional
services in legal, accounting and regulatory affairs. Recruiting key executives.

FEES:  $150  per  hour

It  is  anticipated  that  this contract shall require 240 hours or work product
over  the term of this agreement equating to 10 hours per week. The dollar value
of  the  contract  is  projected  to  be  worth  $35,000  which is equilavent to
5,000,000 shares (Five Million Shares ) of common  stock of GONT valued at $.007
(seven  tenths  of  a  cent)

Payment  in  the  form  of  stock  in  lieu  of  compensation.


2. Indemnification   Public company agrees to indemnify and hold harmless George
Speranza  for  any  acts conducted by Public Company relating to this agreement.

3.  Legal  Certification Public company agrees and certifies that it shall abide
by  all  federal  and  state securities laws during the course of this contract.

Agreed  to  by  George  Speranza
/s/ Georgia Speranza

Agreed  to  by  Joe  Naughton,  CEO  GONT
/s/ Joseph M. Naughton
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to thatcertain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015, by andamong WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, CWCAPITAL ASSETMANAGEMENT LLC, as General Special Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A.,as NCB Master Servicer, NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK, N.A, as NCB SpecialServicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and asCustodian and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respectto Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-C30 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 throughDecember 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performanceper the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled allof its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### § 660.4 Potency test.

To be satisfactory for release, each filling of Antibody to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen shall be tested against the Reference Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Panel and shall be sufficiently potent to detect the antigen in the appropriate sera of the reference panel by all test methods recommended by the manufacturer in the package insert.

[40 FR 29711, July 15, 1975]
#### Rushing *et al. v.*Kicklighter *et al.*

No. 8709.

April 16, 1932.

*TJ. L. Stanfield*and *P. M. Anderson,*for plaintiffs.

*J. T. Grice*and *Bruce D.*Dubberly, for defendant.

Per Curiam.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2. The court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition. A cause of action was set forth; and under the principle that one partner can collect a debt due to the partnership, Dubberly was bound by the action of Kicklighter, as a partner in the firm of Kicklighter & Dubberly, in agreeing to pay money in his hands sufficient to have discharged the indebtedness of the petitioners in this case upon a note. The authorities upon which reliance is placed, which require the consent of all partners to the act of another partner in order to apply any portion of the partnership assets to the payment of his' individual liability, are not in point under the facts as alleged in the petition in this case.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 21

                                 PSEG POWER LLC

                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                      State of
Name                                                  Ownership %   Organization
----                                                  -----------   ------------
PSEG Fossil LLC                                           100         Delaware
PSEG Nuclear LLC                                          100         Delaware
PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC                         100         Delaware

NOTE:  The  remaining  subsidiaries  of  PSEG  Power  LLC  are  not  significant
subsidiaries as defined in Regulation SX.
Editorial Note on Part 862
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 862 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 862.1360 Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and isoenzymes test system. ( a ) *Identification.* A gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and isoenzymes test system is a device intended to measure the activity of the enzyme gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP) in plasma and serum. Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and isoenzymes measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases such as alcoholic cirrhosis and primary and secondary liver tumors.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 862.9.
[52 FR 16122, May 1, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 2306, Jan. 14, 2000]
# C_2015294EN.01006302.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/63

---

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — Flachglas Torgau and Others v Commission

(Case T-276/14) (1)

1

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/77)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Flachglas Torgau GmbH (Torgau, Germany); Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany); and Saint-Gobain Oberland AG (Bad Wurzach, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and H. Janssen, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

| 3. | Flachglas Torgau GmbH, Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG and Saint-Gobain Oberland AG shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Flachglas Torgau GmbH, Saint-Gobain Isover G+H AG and Saint-Gobain Oberland AG shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---