alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the use of our report,
dated February 6, 2003, related to the consolidated  balance sheets of Volunteer
Bancorp,  Inc. and  subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders' equity, cash flows
and  comprehensive  income and Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002,
for Volunteer Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ Welch & Associates, Ltd.

Welch & Associates, Ltd.
Nashville, Tennessee
March 28, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4722]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 20, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on October 28, 2009 (74 FR 55583), Formulation Technologies 
LLC., 11501 Domain Drive, Suite 130, Austin, Texas 78758, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as an importer of Fentanyl (9801), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for 
analytical characterization, secondary packaging, and for distribution 
to clinical trial sites.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the 
registration of Formulation Technologies LLC., to import the basic 
class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, 
and with United States obligations under international treaties, 
conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA 
has investigated Formulation Technologies LLC., to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted 
registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance 
listed.

    Dated: February 26, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-4722 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 6**  **531**

COREY JAWAN ROBINSON ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT; JAMES BLACKWELL; SGT. W. YOUNG; TIFFANY STARKS; SARAH M. ROBERTS; ANN HALLMAN; HCA GREGORY SARVER; LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; DAVID TATARSKY; ANNA MOAKS; CANDACE A. WIGFALL; RAMNARINE JAGLAL; LT. DESSIRENCE LLOYD; SGT. Y. BLOWE; DHO A. BROWN; WARDEN WAYNE MCCAVE; CPL. GREALIN FRAIZER; SGT. J. SMITH; DOCTOR R. BABB ,
Defendant s

- Appellee s
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg

. Henry M. Herlong , Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 5:1 0

- cv

- 0 2593

- HMH )

Submitted : July 26, 2012 Decided: August 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Corey Jawan Robinson , Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, Robert Holmes Hood, Jr., Thomas Happel Scurry, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina , f or Appellee s
.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Corey Jawan Robinson appeals the district court ’ s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) com plaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Robinson v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr. , No. 5:10

- cv

- 02593

- HMH

(D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2015-3, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





|   |                                                                                                              
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.




|   |                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on August 12, 2015 and ending on February 29, 2016 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.







Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 20th day of May, 2016.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LADISH CO., INC. AS OF AND FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         859
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300
<INVENTORY>                                    48,210
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               79,411
<PP&E>                                         144,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (59,868)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          42,552
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       143
<OTHER-SE>                                     70,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,776
<SALES>                                        129,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,330
<CGS>                                          115,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (659)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,629
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,485
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,485
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.44


</TABLE>
#### Board of Commissioners of Jasper County et al. *v.*Marion.

[No. 18,865.

Filed October 25, 1900.]

From the Jasper Circuit Court.

*Reversed.*

*W. F. Townsend, A. E. Chizum, C. W. Hanley*and *J. J. Hunt,*for appellants.

*F. Foltz, C. G. Spitler, H. R. Kurrie, E. B. Sellers*and *W. B. Austin,*for appellee.

Baker, C. J.

— Appellee began two suits, which were afterwards consolidated, to enjoin payment under contracts entered into between the board of commissioners of Jasper county and Fleener and Carnahan, whereby the latter were to search for and report to the county auditor concealed, omitted, and unassessed taxable property, and to receive for their services a percentage of all taxes collected through their efforts. The errors assigned and not waived question the action of the court in overruling the demurrers to the complaints and the motion for a new trial.

The controlling facts are the same as those in *Board*v. *Dickinson,*153 Ind. 682, and upon the authority of that case the judgment herein is reversed with instructions to sustain the demurrers to each paragraph of complaint.
# C_2015406EN.01003001.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 October 2015 — Hewlett Packard Development Company v OHIM (ELITEPAD)

(Case T-470/14) (1)

((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark ELITEPAD - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 406/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hewlett Packard Development Company LP (Houston, Texas, United States) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 March 2014 (Case R 884/2013-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign ELITEPAD as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hewlett Packard Development Company LP to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hewlett Packard Development Company LP to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014.

---
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4620]



[[Page 10248]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12613-003]


Tygart LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted for 
Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing 
Applications

February 26, 2010.
    On February 1, 2010, the Tygart LLC filed an application, pursuant 
to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the 
feasibility of the Tygart Project, to be located the U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers Tygart Dam, on the Tygart River, Taylor County, West 
Virginia.
    The proposed project would utilize the existing U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers' Tygart Dam and would consist of: (1) A proposed intake 
structure to be built on the upstream face of the dam; (2) two 180-
inch-diameter, 460-foot-long penstocks through the dam; (3) a proposed 
powerhouse containing 2 generating units with a total generating 
capacity of 29.0 MW; (4) a proposed 6,700-foot-long, 138 kV 
transmission line; (5) a tailrace, and (6) appurtenant facilities. The 
project would have an estimated average annual generation of 92.0 
gigawatts-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. M. Clifford Phillips, Advanced Hydro 
Solutions LLC, 150 North Miller Road, Suite 450 C, Fairlawn, OH 44333, 
phone (330) 869-8451.
    FERC Contact: Michael Spencer, (202) 502-6093.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp.
    More information about this project can be viewed or printed on the 
``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-12613) in the docket 
number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-
866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4620 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 11
 
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED            SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  JUNE 30,                     JUNE 30,
                                                         ---------------------------  ---------------------------
                                                             1997           1996          1997           1996
                                                         -------------  ------------  -------------  ------------
<S>                                                      <C>            <C>           <C>            <C>
Net income.............................................  $   3,730,138  $  2,882,656  $   7,149,507  $  5,575,990
Weighted average common shares outstanding.............      7,524,418     6,993,805      7,520,037     6,995,819
Primary earnings per share.............................  $        0.50  $       0.41  $        0.95  $       0.80
                                                         -------------  ------------  -------------  ------------
                                                         -------------  ------------  -------------  ------------
 
Net income.............................................  $   3,730,138                $   7,149,507
Adjustments net of tax:
  Interest expense on convertible debt.................        823,418                    1,652,343
  Amortization of debt offering costs..................         64,017                      128,461
                                                         -------------                -------------
Fully diluted net income...............................  $   4,617,573                $   8,930,311
                                                         -------------                -------------
                                                         -------------                -------------
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding.............      7,524,418                    7,520,037
Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect of
  stock options........................................        209,666                      209,569
Shares converted from convertible debt.................      2,628,340                    2,628,340
                                                         -------------                -------------
Total outstanding shares for fully diluted earnings per
  share computation....................................     10,362,424                   10,357,946
Fully diluted earnings per share.......................  $        0.45                $        0.86
                                                         -------------                -------------
                                                         -------------                -------------
</TABLE>
 
                                       19
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3060 *Blastomyces dermatitidis* serological reagents. ( a ) *Identification. Blastomyces dermatitidis* serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to *Blastomyces determatitidis* in serum. The identification aids in the diagnosis of blastomycosis caused by the fungus *Blastomyces dermatitidis.* Blastomycosis is a chronic granulomatous (tumor-like) disease, which may be limited to the skin or lung or may be widely disseminated in the body resulting in lesions of the bones, liver, spleen, and kidneys.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 63 FR 59226, Nov. 3, 1998]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     ARMANINO FOODS OF DISTINCTION, INC.
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB of Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc. for the period ending
June 30, 2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc.





/s/ William J. Armanino
William J. Armanino
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Armanino Foods of
Distinction, Inc. and will be retained by Armanino Foods of Distinction,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 794 

To eliminate the COVID–19 vaccine and mask requirement in Head Start 

Programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio (for himself, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. MOOLENAAR, and 

Mr. RUTHERFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To eliminate the COVID–19 vaccine and mask requirement 

in Head Start Programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending Mandates on 

5 Head Start Educators Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATING THE COVID–19 VACCINE AND MASK 

7 REQUIREMENT IN HEAD START PROGRAMS. 

8 The Secretary of Health and Human Services may 

9 not implement, enforce, or otherwise give effect to the rule 

10 entitled ‘‘Vaccine and Mask Requirements To Mitigate the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 794 IH

1 Spread of COVID–19 in Head Start Programs’’ published 

2 by the Department of Health and Human Services on No3 vember 30, 2021 (86 Fed. Reg. 68052), and may not pro4 mulgate any substantially similar rule. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7620 

To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to require the 

acceptance of cash payments for entrance fees at units of the National 

Park System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2024 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself, Mrs. PELTOLA, Mr. POSEY, Mr. ROSE, Mr. 

ROUZER, Mr. LAMBORN, Ms. MACE, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. ZINKE, 

Mr. ROSENDALE, and Ms. BOEBERT) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 

to require the acceptance of cash payments for entrance 

fees at units of the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Access to 

5 Recreation with Cash Act’’ or the ‘‘PARC Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7620 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE OF CASH PAYMENTS FOR ENTRANCE 

2 FEES AT UNITS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYS3 TEM. 

4 Section 803(e) of the Federal Lands Recreation En5 hancement Act (16 U.S.C. 6802(e)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(3) ACCEPTANCE OF CASH PAYMENTS RE8 QUIRED.—The Secretary of the Interior shall require 

9 that any unit of the National Park System at which 

10 an entrance fee is charged in accordance with para11 graph (1) accept cash as a form of payment for the 

12 entrance fee.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
§ 812.62 IRB approval. ( a ) An IRB shall review and have authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all investigations covered by this part.
( b ) If no IRB exists or if FDA finds that an IRB's review is inadequate, a sponsor may submit an application to FDA.
[46 FR 8957, Jan. 27, 1981]