alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.       |   | The      quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010 as      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|  2. |   | The information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and result of operations of the  Company.                                                                                                                                                         |

| Date:   August      12, 2010 | By:                                | /s/      Brandon Cade Thompson |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                                        | Brandon      Cade Thompson         |
|                                        | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                                        | (Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                                        |                               |
| Date:   August      12, 2010 | By:                                | /s/      Paul Williams         |
|                                        | Paul      Williams                 |
|                                        | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|                                        | (Principal      Financial Officer) |

----
**Exhibit32**

## **CERTIFICATION**

**The undersigned certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:**

 
| (1) | The accompanying Quarterly Report  on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended January 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in  the accompanying Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.                                  |

 
| Date:  |  January 29, 2007 |   |                                  | /s/ Rodney A. Young |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   |                   |   | Rodney A. Young                       |
|   |                   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                   |   |                                  |
|   |                   |   |                                  |
| Date:  |  January 29, 2007 |   |                                  | /s/ Dale H. Johnson |   |
|   |                   |   | Dale H. Johnson                       |
|   |                   |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

1

----
# C_2014235EN.01002101.xml

| 21.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/21

---

Action brought on 14 April 2014 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (NEXTCARD)

(Case T-233/14)

2014/C 235/28

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi, G. Ghisletti and F. Braga, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 February 2014 in Case R 1807/2013-5; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 February 2014 in Case R 1807/2013-5;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark NEXTCARD for goods and services in Classes 9 and 36 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 3 79  931

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused in part

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2015-C24,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C24

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 1, 2015 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
From: Jordan, Ronald

To: Craig, Nathan D

Cc: Flanders, Phillip; Schroeder, Cuc; Yan Zhuang; Thomas Finseth; Dan-Tam Nguyen

Subject: Follow-up to the EPA-Duke Energy call about Miami Fort FGD data

Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:11:25 AM

Attachments: Questions for Miami Fort.docx

Good morning Nathan,

I’m following up on a few items from our June 2nd call regarding the Miami Fort data. According to

my notes, you’re checking into the following:

1. Confirm whether the research lab result for arsenic of 4.34 ug/L on 6/28/11 is a J-value.

2. Provide additional lab reports for the arsenic data you submitted (see question #5 of the

attached file).

3. For arsenic data on 7/31/12 and 8/1/12, the data submitted with comments show nondetect

at 10 ppb, while the spreadsheet provided in response to EPA’s data request shows

nondetect at 20 ppb. Please confirm which RL is correct.

4. As I recall, during the call Duke staff suggested some of the arsenic data may have been

analyzed at labs that are not certified. If so, please specify which data this applies to.

5. Please provide the lab report for the mercury result of 343 ng/L on 11/2/10.

6. Confirm whether the mercury result of 0.5 ng/L on 4/2/13 is nondetect (see question #12 of

the attached file).

7. Please provide the lab report for total mercury on 9/1/09 and 9/21/09 (see question #14 of

the attached file).

8. Confirm the dilution factor calculations for outfall 601 on 9/3/13 for units 7 & 8 (see

question #18 of the attached file).

9. Please provide the additional lab reports for the mercury data you submitted (see question

#20 of the attached file).

If possible, it would be great to wrap this up by the end of the week.

Regards,

Ron

From: Jordan, Ronald 

Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:32 PM

To: Craig, Nathan D

Cc: Stenger, Jennifer A; Kennedy, William; Delis, Brandon; Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip; Thomas

Finseth; Dan-Tam Nguyen; Yan Zhuang

Subject: Topics for EPA-Duke Energy call about Miami Fort FGD data

Nathan,

Please see the attached file containing topics we’d like to discuss during our call next Thursday.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need clarification in advance of the call.

Regards,

Ron
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald W. Reilly, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|/s/    Donald W.
Reilly                 
|Donald W. Reilly
Chief Financial Officer
|March 9, 2011                           

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 874
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 874 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 874.1090 Auditory impedance tester. ( a ) *Identification.* An auditory impedance tester is a device that is intended to change the air pressure in the external auditory canal and measure and graph the mobility characteristics of the tympanic membrane to evaluate the functional condition of the middle ear. The device is used to determine abnormalities in the mobility of the tympanic membrane due to stiffness, flaccidity, or the presence of fluid in the middle ear cavity. The device is also used to measure the acoustic reflex threshold from contractions of the stapedial muscle, to monitor healing of tympanic membrane grafts or stapedectomies, or to monitor followup treatment for inflammation of the middle ear.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is a tympanometer or auditory impedance tester that complies with FDA-recognized consensus standard ANSI S3.39, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 874.9.
[51 FR 40389, Nov. 6, 1986, as amended at 84 FR 71813, Dec. 30, 2019]
# C_2016392EN.01002601.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri v Council

(Case T-121/14) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of biodiesel originating in Indonesia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Normal value - Production costs))

(2016/C 392/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri (Medan, Indonesia) (represented by: F. Graafsma and J. Cornelis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by S. Boelaert, and subsequently by H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents, and by R. Bierwagen and C. Hipp, lawyers)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents), and European Biodiesel Board (EBB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: O. Prost and M.-S. Dibling, lawyers).

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFUE for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (OJ 2013 L 315, p. 2) in so far as it imposes an anti-dumping duty on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Articles 1 and 2 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia, in so far as they concern PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Articles 1 and 2 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013 of 19 November 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia, in so far as they concern PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by PT Pelita Agung Agrindustri;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the European Biodiesel Board (EBB) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.

1

---
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7813 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require an individual to 

provide a social security number to claim the child tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2024 

Mr. VAN DREW (for himself, Ms. HAGEMAN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. 

NEHLS, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. MOORE of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

an individual to provide a social security number to 

claim the child tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Tax Credit In5 tegrity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REQUIRED FOR CHILD 

7 TAX CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 24(e) of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7813 IH

1 ‘‘(e) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER REQUIRED.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para3 graph (2), no credit shall be allowed under this sec4 tion to a taxpayer with respect to any qualifying 

5 child unless the taxpayer includes the social security 

6 number of the taxpayer (in the case of a joint re7 turn, of both spouses) and of such child on the re8 turn of tax for the taxable year. 

9 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION FOR MEMBERS OF ARMED

10 SERVICES.—In the case of an individual who is a 

11 member of the Armed Forces of the United States, 

12 paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting ‘either 

13 spouse’ for ‘both spouses’ in such paragraph. 

14 ‘‘(3) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER DEFINED.— 

15 For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘social se16 curity number’ means a social security number 

17 issued to an individual by the Social Security Ad18 ministration, but only if the social security number 

19 is issued— 

20 ‘‘(A) to a citizen of the United States or 

21 pursuant to subclause (I) (or that portion of 

22 subclause (III) that relates to subclause (I)) of 

23 section 205(c)(2)(B)(i) of the Social Security 

24 Act, and 

25 ‘‘(B) before the due date for such return.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7813 IH

1 (b) OMISSION TREATED AS MATHEMATICAL OR

2 CLERICAL ERROR.—Section 6213(g)(I) of such Code is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘TIN’’ and inserting ‘‘social security 

4 number (as defined in section 24(e))’’. 

5 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 24(h) of 

6 such Code is amended by striking paragraph (7). 

7 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.9 (b)


February 21, 2003

Dr. Kshitij Mohan

President and CEO
INTERNATIONAL REMOTE
  IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.
9172 Eton Ave.
Chatsworth, California  94025

      Re: Modification of Employment Agreement -- Stock Option Grant

Dear Kshitij:

      As you know, International Remote Imaging Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
committed to grant you a 5-year "incentive" stock option to purchase 250,000
shares of common stock under the terms of your employment agreement dated
November 20, 2002. Unfortunately, the Company is unable to honor that commitment
due to a shortage of shares in the Company's stock option plans and tax rules
restricting "incentive" stock options to shares granted from a
shareholder-approved plan.

      Therefore, in lieu of the original stock option commitment, the
Compensation Committee has authorized the Company to grant you the following
stock options:

      - a fully-vested, 5-year incentive stock option from the Company's plans
to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock; and

      - a 5-year, non-qualified stock option from outside of the Company's plans
(sometimes referred to as an "inducement" grant) to purchase 270,000 shares of
common stock vesting in three equal annual installments on the first, second and
third anniversaries of your start date (January 6, 2003).

      These stock options will have an exercise price equal to $2.50, the
closing price of common stock on the American Stock Exchange on November 20,
2002, the date we reached agreement in principal on the terms of your
employment.

      I understand from our conversations that you will accept the foregoing in
full satisfaction of the Company's original commitment to you regarding stock
options.

<PAGE>
      If this letter accurately reflects the terms our understanding regarding
your stock options, please sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter.
Except as modified by this letter, the terms of your original employment
agreement will remain in full force and effect.

Sincerely,



Dr. John A. O'Malley
Chairman of the Board

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



-----------------------------
Dr. Kshitij Mohan

cc: IRIS Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 12

                              FORMICA CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (in millions, except ratio data)


<TABLE>
<S>                                                                        <C>             <C>
                                                                         Three months ended
                                                                             March 31,
                                                                        -----------------------
                                                                          2001           2000
                                                                        --------       --------

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes per statement of
operations                                                              $  (10.8)      $ (15.9)

Add:
Portion of rents representative of the interest factor                       1.0           0.6

Interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt expense                   13.1          10.0
                                                                        --------       -------
Income as adjusted                                                           3.3          (5.3)
                                                                        =========      =======
Fixed Charges:

Interest on indebtedness and amortization of debt expense (1)               13.1          10.0
                                                                        --------       -------
Capitalized interest (2)                                                    --              --
                                                                        --------       -------

Rents                                                                        3.1           1.9
                                                                        --------       -------
Portion of rents representative of the interest factor (3)                   1.0           0.6
                                                                        --------       -------
Fixed Charges (1) + (2) + (3)                                           $   14.1       $  10.6
                                                                        ========       =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                            --            --
                                                                        ========       =======

</TABLE>



                                      E-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,076
<SECURITIES>                                     5,482
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         42
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,320
<PP&E>                                           6,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,816
<SALES>                                          3,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,808
<CGS>                                              540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                       372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>