10502 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 44 / Monday, March 8, 2010 / Notices 

Act. Parties that filed entries of 

appearance in the preliminary phase of 

the investigations need not enter a 

separate appearance for the final phase 

of the investigations. Industrial users, 

and, if the merchandise under 

investigation is sold at the retail level, 

representative consumer organizations 

have the right to appear as parties in 

Commission antidumping and 

countervailing duty investigations. The 

Secretary will prepare a public service 

list containing the names and addresses 

of all persons, or their representatives, 

who are parties to the investigations. 

Background 

Effective December 31, 2009, a 

petition was filed with the Commission 

and Commerce by VAM Drilling USA 

Inc., Houston, TX; Rotary Drilling Tools, 

Beasley, TX; Texas Steel Conversions, 

Inc., Houston, TX; TMK IPSCO, 

Downers Grove, IL; and the United 

Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, 

Manufacturing, Energy, Allied 

Industrial and Service Workers 

International Union, AFL–CIO–CLC, 

Pittsburgh, PA, alleging that an industry 

in the United States is threatened with 

material injury by reason of LTFV and 

subsidized imports of drill pipe and 

drill collars from China. Accordingly, 

effective December 31, 2009, the 

Commission instituted countervailing 

duty investigation No. 701–TA–474 and 

antidumping duty investigation No. 

731–TA–1176 (Preliminary). 

Notice of the institution of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public conference to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register of January 6, 2010 (75 

FR 877). The conference was held in 

Washington, DC, on January 21, 2010, 

and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in these investigations to 

the Secretary of Commerce on February 

22, 2010. The views of the Commission 

are contained in USITC Publication 

4127 (March 2010), entitled Drill Pipe 

and Drill Collars from China: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–474 and 

731–TA–1176 (Preliminary). 

Issued: March 2, 2010. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4746 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–667; 

Investigation No. 337–TA–673] 

In the Matter of Certain Electronic 

Devices, Including Handheld Wireless 

Communications Devices; Notice of 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigations in Their 

Entirety 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 55C) in consolidated 

Inv. Nos. 337–TA–667 and 337–TA– 

673, Certain Electronic Devices 

Including Handheld Wireless 

Communications Devices, granting a 

motion to terminate the consolidated 

investigations in their entirety on the 

basis of settlement agreements. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– 

TA–667 (‘‘the 667 Investigation’’) on 

January 23, 2009, based on a complaint 

filed by Saxon Innovation, LLC of Tyler, 

Texas (‘‘Saxon’’). 74 FR 4231. The 

complaint, as amended and 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain electronic devices, including 

handheld wireless communications 

devices, by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

5,235,635 (‘‘the ‘635 patent’’); 5,530,597 

(‘‘the ‘597 patent’’); and 5,608,873 (‘‘the 

‘873 patent’’). The complaint further 

alleges the existence of a domestic 

industry related to each patent. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named various respondents, including 

Nokia Corporation of Espoo, Finland 

and Nokia Inc. of Irving, Texas 

(collectively ‘‘Nokia’’); High Tech 

Computer Corp. of Taoyuan, Taiwan 

and HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, 

Washington (collectively ‘‘HTC’’); 

Research In Motion Ltd. of Waterloo, 

Ontario and Research In Motion Corp. of 

Irving, Texas (collectively ‘‘RIM’’); and 

Palm, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California 

(‘‘Palm’’). 

The Commission instituted Inv. No. 

337–TA–673 (‘‘the 673 Investigation’’) 

on March 31, 2009, based on a 

complaint filed by Saxon. 74 FR 14578– 

9. The complaint, as amended and 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

electronic devices, including handheld 

wireless communications devices by 

reason of infringement of certain claims 

of the ‘635 patent, the ‘597 patent, and 

the ‘873 patent. The complaint further 

alleges the existence of a domestic 

industry related to each patent. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondents Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. of Seoul, Korea; 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of 

Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and 

Samsung Telecommunications America, 

LLP of Richardson, Texas (collectively 

‘‘Samsung’’). 

On April 23, 2009, the ALJ issued 

Order No. 28 in the 667 investigation 

and Order No. 8 in the 673 

investigation, consolidating the 

investigations. On May 13, 2009, the 

Commission determined not to review 

this consolidation. 

On April 28, 2009, the Commission 

determined not to review an ID granting 

a joint motion filed by Saxon and HTC 

to terminate the 667 investigation as to 

respondent HTC. On July 13, 2009, the 

Commission determined not to review 

an ID granting a joint motion filed by 

Saxon and Nokia to terminate the 

consolidated investigations as to 

respondent Nokia. On October 22, 2009, 

the Commission determined not to 

review an ID granting a joint motion 

filed by Saxon and RIM to terminate the 

investigations as to respondent RIM. All 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 44 / Monday, March 8, 2010 / Notices 10503 

terminations were granted pursuant to 

Commission Rule 210.21(b) (19 CFR 

210.21(b)). 

On January 29, 2010 Saxon and 

respondents Samsung and Palm jointly 

moved to terminate the consolidated 

investigations in their entirety based 

upon settlement agreements between 

the remaining parties in the 

investigation. On February 4, 2010, the 

Commission investigative attorney filed 

a response in support of the motion. On 

February 12, 2010, the ALJ issued the 

subject ID, granting the joint motion to 

terminate the investigations in their 

entirety pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.21(b). No petitions for review were 

filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 2, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4791 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Air Act 

Notice is hereby given that on March 

1, 2010, a proposed consent decree 

(‘‘proposed decree’’) in the United States 

of America v. DEGs of Narrows, LLC., 

Civil Action No. 7:10CV00085 was 

lodged with the United States District 

Court for the Western District of 

Virginia. 

In this action the United States sought 

civil penalties for alleged violations of 

the Clean Air Act at the DEGs of 

Narrows, LLC facility in Narrows, 

Virginia. The complaint alleged that 

DEGs of Narrows, LLC violated the 

Clean Air Act, Sections 110, 112 and 

502 of the CAA, 42, U.S.C. 7410, 7412, 

and 7661a, by failing to comply with the 

Commonwealth of Virginia’s State 

Implementation Plan requirements for 

the Virigina NOx Budget Trading 

Program in 9 VAC 5–140 et seq, failing 

to comply with the Title V permit for 

the facility, and failing to comply with 

leak detection and repair requirements 

for the facility’s methylene chloride 

system. Under the terms of the proposed 

decree, DEGS of Narrows, LLC will pay 

a civil penalty of $310,000. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the proposed decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States of America v. DEGs of Narrows, 

LLC., D.J. Ref. 90–5–2–1–09375. 

The proposed decree may be 

examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney, 310 1st Street, SW., 

Room 906, Roanoke, Virginia 24011, 

and at U.S. EPA Region III, 1650 Arch 

Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029. 

During the public comment period, the 

proposed decree may also be examined 

on the following Department of Justice 

Web site, to http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

proposed decree may also be obtained 

by mail from the Consent Decree 

Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department 

of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 

or by faxing or e-mailing a request to 

Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$8.25 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if 

by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that 

amount to the Consent Decree Library at 

the stated address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources, 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4790 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Air Act, the Clean 

Water Act, the Emergency Planning 

and Community Right-To-Know Act, 

and the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act 

Notice is hereby given that on March 

2, 2010, a proposed Consent Decree 

(‘‘Decree’’) in United States v. AES 

Thames, LLC, Civil Action No. 

3:10cv281, was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the District of 

Connecticut. 

The Decree resolves claims of the 

United States against AES Thames, LLC 

under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 

7401–7671q, the Clean Water Act, 33 

U.S.C. 1251–1387, the Emergency 

Planning and Community Right-toKnow Act, 42 U.S.C. 11001–11050, and 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675, for 

injunctive relief and recovery of civil 

penalties in connection with AES 

Thames, LLC’s operation of a coal-fired 

power plant located in Montville, 

Connecticut. The Decree requires AES 

Thames to pay $140,000 in civil 

penalties and institute injunctive relief 

in the form of operator training and 

implementation of additional spill 

control measures and safeguards. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Decree. Comments should 

be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environmental and Natural 

Resources Division, and either e-mailed 

to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. AES Thames, LLC, Civil Action 

No. 3:10cv281 D. Conn.), D.J. Ref. 90–5– 

2–1–08991. 

The Decree may be examined at the 

Office of the United States Attorney, 

District of Connecticut, New Haven 

Office, Connecticut Financial Center, 

157 Church Street, Floor 23, New 

Haven, CT 06510, and at U.S. EPA 

Region I, 5 Post Office Square, Boston, 

MA 02109. During the public comment 

period, the Decree, may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Decree may also be obtained by mail 

from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by 

faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $23.25 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by email or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–4789 Filed 3–5–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES