REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

LNR Partners, LLC
Miami Beach, Florida

We
have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance
with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that LNR Partners, LLC (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities
transactions for which the Company served as special servicer, and that were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, excluding
criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), (3)(i)(c), (3)(i)(d), (3)(ii), (3)(iii), (3)(iv), (4)(v), (4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii),
(4)(xiv) and (4) (xv) which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect
to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based
on our examination.

Our
examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company
performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with
the servicing criteria.

As
described in management’s assertion, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(2)(vii) the Company has engaged a
vendor to perform certain activities required by this servicing criteria. The Company has determined that this vendor is not considered
a “servicer” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing
compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to this vendor as permitted by the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure
Interpretation 200.06, Vendors Engaged by Servicers(“C&DI 200.06”) (formerly SEC Manual Telephone Interpretation
17.06). As permitted by C&DI 200.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable
to this vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply C&DI 200.06
for the vendor and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company’s
determination of its eligibility to apply C&DI 200.06.







In
our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2017 for the commercial mortgage-backed securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material
respects.





February
20, 2018





-2-