alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 520.1720e Phenylbutazone powder. ( a ) *Specifications.* ( 1 ) Each 1.15 grams (g) of powder contains 1 g phenylbutazone.
( 2 ) Each 10 g of powder contains 1 g phenylbutazone.
( b ) *Sponsors.* See sponsor numbers in § 510.600(c) of this chapter. ( 1 ) No. 027053 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 2 ) No. 057699 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( c ) *Conditions of use in horses* — ( 1 ) *Amount.* Administer 1 to 2 g (1 to 2 level scoops, using the scoop provided) per 500 pounds of body weight on a small amount of palatable feed, not exceed 4 g per animal daily.
( 2 ) *Indications for use.* For the relief of inflammatory conditions associated with the musculosketetal system.
( 3 ) *Limitations.* Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Federal law prohibits the extralabel use of this product in female cattle 20 months of age or older. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
[72 FR 27956, May 18, 2007]
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10489-10490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4588]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 10490]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, Initial Review Group Clinical, Treatment and Health 
Services Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: July 19-20, 2010.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Katrina L Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 2019, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-4032, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891 Alcohol 
Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and 
Research Support Awards., National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 26, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-4588 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
# C_2014212EN.01003401.xml

| 7.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/34

---

Action brought on 15 April 2014 — Commission v McCarron Poultry

(Case T-226/14)

2014/C 212/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Van der Hout, lawyer, and L. Cappelletti and F. Moro, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: McCarron Poultry Ltd (Killacorn Emyvale, Ireland)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Order the defendant to pay the European Commission the sum due of EUR 9 76  663,34, corresponding to the principal amount of EUR 9 00  662,25 plus the amount of EUR 76  001,09 as late payment interest calculated at a rate of 2,50 % for the period between 01.12.2010 and 15.04.2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the European Commission the sum due of EUR 9 76  663,34, corresponding to the principal amount of EUR 9 00  662,25 plus the amount of EUR 76  001,09 as late payment interest calculated at a rate of 2,50 % for the period between 01.12.2010 and 15.04.2014;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the European Commission the sum of EUR 61,690 per day by way of interest from 16.04.2014 until the date on which the debt is repaid in full; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the European Commission the sum of EUR 61,690 per day by way of interest from 16.04.2014 until the date on which the debt is repaid in full; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present application is presented under Article 272 TFEU seeking a decision of the General Court ordering the defendant to reimburse the European Commission the principal amount of EUR 9 00  662,25, plus interest, in relation to contract No NNE5/1999/20229 for ‘Community Activities in the Field of the specific programme for RTD and demonstration on “Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development — Part B: Energy program”’.

In support of its application, the European Commission raises a single plea in law: the Commission contends that the defendant has breached its contractual obligations by failing to reimburse to the Commission the difference between the Union's financial contribution due to defendant and the total amount of funding already received by it. The financial contribution due to the defendant is less than the total amount paid by the applicant by means of advance and intermediate payments. The Commission contends therefore that, under the contract, the defendant is liable for the sum due.

---
§ 876.5026 Non-implanted electrical stimulation device for management of premature ejaculation. ( a ) *Identification.* A non-implanted electrical stimulation device for management of premature ejaculation is intended to be used in patients with premature ejaculation by delivery of electrical stimulation to the perineal muscles and nerves.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: ( 1 ) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
( 2 ) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility, electrical safety, and thermal safety of the device.
( 3 ) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: ( i ) Mechanical performance;
( ii ) Electrical stimulation parameters; and
( iii ) Battery performance.
( 4 ) Performance testing must support shelf life by demonstrating continued device functionality over the identified shelf life.
( 5 ) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
( 6 ) Labeling must include: ( i ) Specific instructions regarding safe placement and correct use of the device;
( ii ) Warning(s) against use by patients with active implanted medical devices; and
( iii ) A shelf life.
[87 FR 34166, Apr. 5, 2022]
# C_2015294EN.01005801.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/58

---

Order of the General Court of 9 June 2015 — ArcelorMittal Hamburg and Others v Commission

(Case T-235/14) (1)

1

((State aid - Measures adopted by Germany in favour of electricity generated from renewable energy sources and of energy-intensive undertakings - Decision to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU - Adoption of the final decision after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 294/70)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH (Hamburg, Germany); ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH, successor in law to Bregal Bremer Galvanisierungs GmbH (Bremen, Germany); ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH (Duisburg, Germany); and ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH (Duisburg) (represented by: H. Janssen and G.-R. Engel, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents, and by A. Luke and C. Maurer, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul in part Commission decision C (2013) 4424 final of 18 December 2013 to open the procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU regarding measures implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users (State aid SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN)).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.

| 3. | ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH, ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH, ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH and ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH, ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH, ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH and ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.

1

---
#### TOWN OF LUMBBER CITY *v.*PHILLIPS *et al.*

No. 9027.

June, 17, 1932.

*Hal Lawson,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. 8. Mann,*contra.

Gilbert, J.

Suit was instituted by D. W. Phillips and Mrs. Annie Ryals against the Town of Lumber City, seeking injunction to prevent the maintenance of a nuisance consisting of an open sewer or ditch running by and through real estate owned by petitioners, and from discharging into this ditch sewage, filth, and water; and they prayed that the same be adjudged to be a continuing nuisance and that it be abated. They alleged that obnoxious gases, fumes, and odors were emitted from the ditch; that it was a breeding-place for mosquitoes and malarial germs, and was unhealthy, unsanitary, and unsightly; that they had, without avail, applied to the governing authorities of the city for abatement of the nuisance; that petitioners were without adequate remedy at law, and were being irreparably injured and damaged. The city in its answer admitted the use and maintenance of the ditch, but denied other material averments of the petition; and set up that the ditch had been in use for a period of about fifty years; that Phillips acquired his title on December 7, 1920, and Mrs. Ryals acquired *919hers on September 21, 1927; that neither of them had suffered any loss or damage by reason of the ditch, because it was there when they bought their property and for many years prior thereto; and that the duty of keeping the ditch open and in repair was upon the plaintiffs in this case. The jury trying the case found in favor of the plaintiffs, and that the nuisance be abated. Decree in accordance, with the verdict was entered. The motion of the defendant for a new trial was overruled, and it excepted. *Held,*that the verdict was authorized by the evidence. None of the grounds of the motion for new trial show cause for' reversal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Beck, P. J., and Hill, J., concur.*

*Russell, O. J., and Atkinson, J., dissent.*

The following order was passed by the Supreme Court and by the Court of Appeals of Georgia on June 13, 1932.

It is ordered that the dockets of this court for the March and October terms close respectively on the nineteenth days of June and December, at noon. If the nineteenth day of either of these months shall fall on Sunday, the docket shall close at noon of the following day.
# C_2015429EN.01002001.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2015 –Giuntoli v OHIM — Société des produits Nestlé SA (CREMERIA TOSCANA)

(Case T-256/14) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark CREMERIA TOSCANA - Earlier international figurative mark la Cremeria - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 429/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Andrea Giuntoli (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz and T. Bösling, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 February 2014 (Case R 886/2013-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Société des produits Nestlé SA and Andrea Giuntoli.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Giuntoli to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Giuntoli to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.

1

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0052. JOSHUA AULD v. MINERVA HAYDEE ROSARIO.

Joshua Auld and Minerva Haydee Rosario are the parents of a minor child,

born in 2015. In 2017, the trial court granted Auld’s petition to legitimate the child

and awarded joint legal custody. Thereafter, in 2019, the court awarded Rosario sole

legal custody and established a visitation schedule. The court also ordered Auld to

pay child support, attorney fees, and a child support arrearage and held him in

contempt. Auld filed a timely application from the trial court’s order.1

To determine whether a party may bring a direct appeal, we look to the issue

raised on appeal. See Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 45-46 (799 SE2d 160) (2017).

Here, Auld argues, among other things, that the trial court erred in its rulings on

custody and visitation. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), “[a]ll judgments or

orders in child custody cases awarding, refusing to change, or modifying child

custody” are directly appealable. In addition, visitation is considered a custody issue.

See OCGA § 19-9-41 (4) (defining “child custody proceeding” as “a proceeding in

which legal custody, physical custody, or visitation with respect to a child is an

issue”). Because the trial court’s order modified custody and visitation, and Auld

challenges those rulings on appeal, the order is directly appealable under OCGA § 5-

6-34 (a) (11).

1 The trial court entered its order on June 26, 2019. On July 17, Auld filed an

emergencymotion for an extension of time in which to file his application, which was

granted on August 12, and this Court ordered him to file his application within ten

days. See Case No. A20E0003 (Aug. 12, 2019). Auld thereafter filed his application

on August 22, 2019. 

September 06, 2019
This Court will grant an otherwise timely discretionary application if the lower

court’s order is directly appealable and the applicant has not already filed a notice of

appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED.

Auld shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the

trial court. If he has already filed a notice of appeal, he need not file a second notice.

The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/06/2019
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS							   Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by							   Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report							   Series
- Contact

### Quaternary geology of Minnesota and parts of adjacent 
States

#### Professional Paper 161

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (19185 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                 
    (14567 pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                 
    (13429 pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                 
    (1355 pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                 
    (13867 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and					   
Notices

U.S. Department of the					   Interior |				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp161 
                    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact				   Page				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 2012 
00:10:19
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 784 

To require any person that maintains an internet website or that sells or 

distributes a mobile application that is owned, wholly or partially, by 

the Chinese Communist Party or by a non-state-owned entity located 

in the People’s Republic of China, to disclose that fact to any individual 

who downloads or otherwise uses such website or application. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Mr. FULCHER (for himself and Mr. PAPPAS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require any person that maintains an internet website 

or that sells or distributes a mobile application that 

is owned, wholly or partially, by the Chinese Communist 

Party or by a non-state-owned entity located in the People’s Republic of China, to disclose that fact to any 

individual who downloads or otherwise uses such website 

or application. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 784 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Application 

3 Integrity and Disclosure Act’’ or the ‘‘Internet Application 

4 I.D. Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. CHINESE OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE REQUIRE6 MENTS. 

7 (a) DISCLOSURE.—Any person that maintains an 

8 internet website or that sells or distributes a mobile appli9 cation that is owned, wholly or partially, by the Chinese 

10 Communist Party or by a non-state-owned entity located 

11 in the People’s Republic of China, shall disclose to any 

12 individual who downloads or otherwise uses such website 

13 or application, in a clear and conspicuous manner, that 

14 such website or application is owned, wholly or partially, 

15 by the Chinese Communist Party or by a non-state-owned 

16 entity located in the People’s Republic of China. 

17 (b) FALSE INFORMATION.—It shall be unlawful for 

18 any person to knowingly disclose false information under 

19 this section. 

20 SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT. 

21 (a) UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE ACTS OR PRACTICES.— 

22 A violation of this Act shall be treated as a violation of 

23 a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice pre24 scribed under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade 

25 Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 784 IH

1 (b) POWERS OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMIS2 SION.— 

3 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Federal Trade Commis4 sion shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by 

5 the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, 

6 powers, and duties as though all applicable terms 

7 and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act 

8 (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and 

9 made a part of this Act. 

10 (2) PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES.—Any person 

11 that violates this Act shall be subject to the pen12 alties, and entitled to the privileges and immunities, 

13 provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 

14 U.S.C. 41 et seq.). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Editorial Note on Part 880
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 880 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 880.6970 Liquid crystal vein locator. ( a ) *Identification.* A liquid crystal vein locator is a device used to indicate the location of a vein by revealing variations in the surface temperature of the skin by displaying the color changes of heat sensitive liquid crystals (cholesteric esters).
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, subject to the limitations in § 880.9.
[45 FR 69682, Oct. 21, 1980, as amended at 54 FR 25050, June 12, 1989; 66 FR 38807, July 25, 2001]