alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 866
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 866 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 866.3280 *Francisella tularensis* serological reagents. ( a ) *Identification. Francisella tularensis* serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to *Francisella tularensis* in serum or to identify *Francisella tularensis* in cultured isolates derived from clinical specimens. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents) used to identify *Francisella tularensis* directly from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of tularemia caused by *Francisella tularensis* and provides epidemiological information on this disease. Tularemia is a desease principally of rodents, but may be transmitted to humans through handling of infected animals, animal products, or by the bites of fleas and ticks. The disease takes on several forms depending upon the site of infection, such as skin lesions, lymph node enlargements, or pulmonary infection.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
[47 FR 50823, Nov. 9, 1982, as amended at 63 FR 59226, Nov. 3, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.6770 Cartridge syringe. ( a ) *Identification.* A cartridge syringe is a device intended to inject anesthetic agents subcutaneously or intramuscularly. The device consists of a metal syringe body into which a disposable, previously filled, glass carpule (a cylindrical cartridge) containing anesthetic is placed. After attaching a needle to the syringe body and activating the carpule by partially inserting the plunger on the syringe, the device is used to administer an injection to the patient.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 84 FR 71813, Dec. 30, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 44 (Monday, March 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 10507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-4844]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Information Security Oversight Office; National Industrial 
Security Program Policy Advisory Committee (NISPPAC)

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app 2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101-6, announcement is 
made for a meeting of the National Industrial Security Program Policy 
Advisory Committee. The meeting will be held to discuss National 
Industrial Security Program policy matters.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 24, 2010 from 10 a.m. to 12 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Archives and Records Administration, 700 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Archivist's Reception Room, Room 105, 
Washington, DC 20408.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David O. Best, Senior Program Analyst, 
ISOO, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20408, telephone number (202) 357-5123, or at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b4b1a6b9b4feb2b5a3a490beb1a2b1feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9cdc8dfc0cd87cbccdadde9c7c8dbc887cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>. Contact ISOO at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c455f43434c626d7e6d226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="feb7adb1b1be909f8c9fd0999188">[email protected]</span></a> and the NISPPAC at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b1512080b0b1a181b353a293a753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="733d3a2023233230331d1201125d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be open to the public. 
However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and 
telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to 
the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than 
Wednesday, March 17, 2010. ISOO will provide additional instructions 
for gaining access to the location of the meeting.

    Dated: March 2, 2010.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-4844 Filed 3-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
7/15/2009 Page of

IN ITI AL REVIEW EXPOSU RE REPORT (IRExR)

Chemical ID: P0904517/15/2009 Page of

IN ITIA L REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P0904517/15/2009 Page of

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P0904517/15/2009 Page of

IN ITI AL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P0904517/15/2009 Page of



## LEGEND FOR NEW CHEMICAL S EXPOSURE REPORT

This new chemicals exposure report wa s prepared by the Exposure Assessment Branch (EAB) of the Economics,

Exposure and Technology Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, USEPA.

The goals of these reports are to calcula te conservative (protective) estimates of exposure endpoints for consumers,

the general population, and the environment.

For each exposure scenario to industrial releases, the following three endpoints are calculated:

(1) maximum possible acute concentrations and doses

(2) maximum possible chronic concentrations and doses

(3) for water releases ≥ 20 days, the probability of exceedence of the aquatic concentration of concern

These endpoints are identified by abbreviati ons on the Release Activity line, e.g., (1) max ADR , (2) max

LADD , (3) max PDM . Depending on the release inputs, these e ndpoints may be calculated and presented on

the same page or different pages. That is, a release activity ID of mfg; max ADR, max PDM, max LADD

indicates that all the exposure endpoints were cal culated from common manufacturing release values;

conversely, a release activity ID of mfg &proc; max ADR indicates that only the maximum acute exposure

values were calculated for manufacturing and proce ssing releases that occurred at the same site.

For each consumer product use exposure scenario, whether exposure is to the user directly or to the general

population/environment, the maximum exposure values are calculated and presented together.

In addition to the exposure values above, EPA policy dir ects that exposure and release values be compared to

criteria threshold values for Exposure-based and PBT Exposure-based cases.

Exposure-based (YX) cases (those with ≥ 100,000 kg/yr production volume)

Criteria are exceeded under the following conditions:

Presence in consumer product with likely exposure

≥ 3E-3 mg/kg/d exposure via air, fish ingestion or drinking water

≥ 10,000 kg/yr release to environment (post-treatment)

≥ 1,000 kg/yr release to water (post-treatment)

Persistent, Bioaccumulative, Toxic (PBT) chemical s of P2B2 rating or hi gher and production volume ≥ 20,000 kg/yr

Criteria are exceeded as for YX cases, with the following differences:

≥ 2,000 kg/yr release to environment (post-treatment)

≥ 200 kg/yr release to water (post-treatment)

Bolding rules in the Report: Values for endpoints above th at are also health or eco concerns are bolded.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT (10)(a)

                             AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
                             ----------------------


     THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is made and entered into as of
September 11, 1997 by and between Amax Gold Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and Leland O. Erdahl ("Mr. Erdahl").

     WHEREAS, the Company and Mr. Erdahl are parties to that certain Agreement
made and entered into March 24, 1997 regarding Mr. Erdahl's service as Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company; and

     WHEREAS, the Company and Mr. Erdahl desire to extend the term of the
Agreement.

     THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

     1.   Section 2.1 of the Agreement is amended by replacing "September 30,
1997" in the second line thereof with "October 31, 1997".

     2.   Section 2.2 of the Agreement is amended by replacing "September 30,
1997" in the third line thereof with "October 31, 1997".

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Agreement as of the date first above written.


AMAX GOLD INC., a Delaware
corporation


By:/s/ S. Scott Shellhaas                     /s/ Leland O. Erdahl 
   -------------------------                  --------------------------
       S. Scott Shellhaas                         Leland O. Erdahl
Title: President and Chief Operating
       Officer
Editorial Note on Part 872
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 872 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 872.6200 Base plate shellac. ( a ) *Identification.* Base plant shellac is a device composed of shellac intended to rebuild the occlusal rim of full or partial dentures.
( b ) *Classification.* Class I (general controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 872.9. If the device is not labeled or otherwise represented as sterile, it is exempt from the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the quality system regulation in part 820 of this chapter, with the exception of § 820.180, with respect to general requirements concerning records, and § 820.198, with respect to complaint files.
[52 FR 30097, Aug. 12, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 13830, Apr. 5, 1989; 66 FR 38799, July 25, 2001]
# S upport Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PMN)

P-00-442

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

# Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P -00-442

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for

PM N P -00-442

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for

PMN P -00-442

# A-001

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P -00-442

# A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P -00-442

# A-003

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P -00-442
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D22-1992 

LT Case No. 2016-000010-CF

_____________________________

HAROLD SWIFT, 

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County. 

Howard O. McGillin, Jr., Judge. 

Harold Swift, Lowell, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T.

Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

April 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., MAKAR, and HARRIS, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
- USGS Home
- Contact USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent publications 
    by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore          
        	 
  Explore recent publications 
    by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by Publication type and year
- Explore recent publications 
    by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs Warehouse 
    by Publication type and year
- Documentation           
       	 
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US 
    Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### The Quaternary geology of southeastern Wisconsin, with a 
chapter on the older rock formations

#### Professional Paper 106

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility 
            FOIA 
            Privacy 
            Policies and Notices

U.S. 
Department of the Interior |                 U.S. Geological Survey                URL: 
http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp106 
                                    Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page                    Page Last Modified: February 
02, 2012 00:10:36
§ 74.2706 FD&C Yellow No. 6. ( a ) *Identity and specifications.* The color additive FD&C Yellow No. 6 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of § 74.706 (a)(1) and (b).
( b ) *Uses and restrictions.* FD&C Yellow No. 6 may be safely used for coloring cosmetics generally in amounts consistent with current good manufacturing practice.
( c ) *Labeling.* The label of the color additive shall conform to the requirements of § 70.25 of this chapter.
( d ) *Certification.* All batches of FD&C Yellow No. 6 shall be certified in accordance with regulations in part 80 of this chapter.
[51 FR 41782, Nov. 19, 1986]
#### Francis R. Feelan et al. *v.*Howard G. Feelan et al.

*Arnold M. Sweig,*for the appellees (plaintiffs).

*Howard R. Steeg,*for the appellant (named defendant).

Argued June 3

decided June 3, 1969

The motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.
Nemo

Piedmont

Meade

Pennington

Lawrence

Pennington

Meade

Lawrence

T03NR05E

T03NR06E

T02NR06E T02NR05E

T03NR07E

T04NR05E

T02NR07E

T03NR04E

T04NR06E

T02NR04E

T04NR04E

1

7

6

2

8

4

8

8

3

1

2

9

4

5 4

5

3

5

7

7

2 1

3

9

8

9

6

5

4

9

7

6

8

6

6

7

7

5

8

1

1

11

12

11

11

11

18

31

19

30

31

36

34 32

24

33

25

12

16

26

12

10

36

13

34

14

23

33

32

21

35

17

28

27

12

14

23 24

13

10

22

27 25

31

16

22

15

19

20

29

32 33

10

26

10

21

30

35

15

35

29

31

18

30 28

19

18

34

20

17

36

17

20

29

31 32

32

33

12

36

25

24

13

12

36

13 18 15 14 17

13 18 17 16 14

15 13 18 17 16

25 30 29 28 27

9

0 0.5 1 2 3

Miles

Steamboat Project Area

Existing Structural Stage

Steamboat Boundary

Private Land

Structural Stage

1

2

3A

3B

3C

4A

4B

4C

5

/
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7928 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7928

To direct the Secretary of Defense to revise the rates of basic pay for 
          certain enlisted members of the uniformed services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2024

Mr. Mike Garcia of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to revise the rates of basic pay for 
          certain enlisted members of the uniformed services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION TO THE RATES OF BASIC PAY FOR CERTAIN ENLISTED 
              MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall change the 
following cells in the military monthly basic pay table that was 
effective as of January 1, 2024, in accordance with the following:
            (1) E-1 with greater than four months in service to 
        $2,600.60.
            (2) E-2 to $2,799.20.
            (3) E-3 with less than three years of service to $2,900.90.
            (4) E-3 with three years of service to $2,950.60.
            (5) E-3 with four years of service to $3,000.60.
            (6) E-3 with six or more years of service to $3,050.60.
            (7) E-4 with less than two years of service to $3,010.50.
            (8) E-4 with two years of service to $3,060.60.
            (9) E-4 with three years of service to $3,100.10.
            (10) E-4 with four years of service to $3,150.80.
            (11) E-4 with six years of service to $3,210.30.
            (12) E-4 with eight or more years of service to $3,260.30.
            (13) E-5 with less than two years of service to $3,100.30.
            (14) E-5 with two years of service to $3,150.20.
            (15) E-5 with three years of service to $3,200.20.
            (16) E-5 with four years of service to $3,250.20.
            (17) E-6 with less than two years of service to $3,210.
    (b) Adjustment.--The 5.2-percent increase in pay in the fiscal year 
2024 budget request or any future raises for all grades included in any 
future budget request is in addition to the changes identified in 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016106EN.01004601.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/46

---

Order of the General Court of 19 January 2016 — Klass v OHIM — F. Smit (PLAYSEAT and PLAYSEATS)

(Case T-540/14) (1)

1

(2016/C 106/55)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopure Corporation
for the period ended April 30, 2004, I, Francis H. Murphy, Chief Executive
Officer, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1. the Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2004, fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and

   2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30,
      2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Biopure Corporation.

/s/ Francis H. Murphy
--------------------------
Francis H. Murphy
Chief Executive Officer

June 14, 2004

                                       38
# C_2014194EN.01003401.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/34

---

Action brought on 30 April 2014 — Mabrouk v Council

(Case T-277/14)

2014/C 194/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mohamed Marouen Ben Ali Bel Ben Mohamed Mabrouk (Carthage, Tunisia) (represented by: J. Farthouat, J. Mignard, N. Boulay, lawyers, and S. Crosby, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that the defendant has infringed Article 265 TFUE by failing to act upon the request of the applicant of 17 January 2014, of which it acknowledged receipt, to disclose the evidence upon which it relies to freeze the assets of the applicant in the European Union; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the defendant has infringed Article 265 TFUE by failing to act upon the request of the applicant of 17 January 2014, of which it acknowledged receipt, to disclose the evidence upon which it relies to freeze the assets of the applicant in the European Union; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law.

The applicant alleges that the defendant is under a legal duty to disclose to the applicant the evidence upon which it relies to freeze the applicant’s assets, and that the defendant was formally called upon to disclose this evidence and was thus fully called upon to act. It has not acted either by disclosing the evidence or by refusing to do so, and it has thus infringed Article 265 TFEU.

---
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 1 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Diane Moser                    | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 500 Woodward Ave |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | Mail code:  MI-01-20-TRES |
|                                            | Detroit, MI 48226 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
Editorial Note on Part 882
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 882 appear at 73 FR 35341, June 23, 2008.

§ 882.1350 Needle electrode. ( a ) *Identification.* A needle electrode is a device which is placed subcutaneously to stimulate or to record electrical signals.
( b ) *Classification.* Class II (performance standards).